Skip to main content

Full text of "Respiratory care : the official journal of the American Association for Respiratory Therapy"

See other formats


JULY    2002 
VOLUME    47 
NUMBER    7 

ISSN  0020-1324-RECACP 


A  MONTHLY  SCIENCE  JOURNAL 
47TH  YEAR— ESTABLISHED  1956 


EDITORIALS 


SPECIAL  ISSUE 

AIRWAY  CLEARANCE 
TECHNIQUES 


Secretion  Clearance  Techniques 


SYMPOSIUM  PAPERS 


Physiology  of  Airway  Mucus  Clearance 

Positioning  vs  Postural  Drainage 

Autogenic  Drainage  and  Active  Cycle  of 
Breathing 

Positive  Pressure  Techniques 

High-Frequency  Oscillation  of  the  Airway  and 
Chest  Wall 

Techniques  for  Artificial  Airways 

Mucoactive  Agents 

Strategies  for  the  Pediatric  Patient 


RESPIRONK 


I 


www.respironics.c 


ADVANTMSE  ,3 

New   OptiChamber"    Advantage     10 

Valved    Holding    Chamber   helps       ■' 

your  patients  get  the  best  part  of      '49  lpm    u 

their  asthma   inhaler   medication 

in  the  most  efficient  way.  With 

a     better    design     and     better  op«ic«ami,e 

delivery,     OptiChamber    gives    you  , 

and    your    patients    the    advantage 

in  metered  dose  inhaler  therapy. 

Better  Design 

•  OptiChamber's  new  clear  mouthpiece  and  low- 
resistance  valve  help  parents  and  caregivers  see 
the  valve  move,  which  helps  coordinate  proper 
timing  of  medication  actuation. 

•  Detachable  masks  allow  children  to  use  the 
holding  chamber  mouthpiece  as  soon  as  possible 
without  the  cost  of  buying  a  new  chamber. 

•  The  valve  and  end  cap  are  easily  removed  for  cleaning. 


M 

sr 

IS 
10 
5 
0 

I 

■  -J 

m     m 

^     ■ 

4.9  LPM      12.0  LPM     30.0  LPM 

MDI  HFA  Proventil 
AeroChamber  Plus  -^ 

OptiChamber 


•  And,  OptiChamber's  more  flexible 
MDI  adapter  accommodates  a  wide 
variety  of  CFC  and  HFA  canisters, 
making  it  easier  to  implement  a 
I         common  canister  protocol.' 

LPM     JO.OLPM  „    ..        ^    .. 

Better  Delivery 

^•  OptiChamber's  optimal 
larger  size  (218  mL  volume) 
makes    more    fine    particle 


dose  available  for  inhalation 
for  patients  of  all  ages.'-^ 

Call  1  -800-962-1 266  to  give  your 
patients  the  OptiChamber"  Advantage  today. 

1 )  Wojciechowski  W.  Respir  Care  3001 -.A?  (Abstract  No. 
OF-01-122):10e2. 

2)  Data  presented  at  the  2001  American  College  of  Allergy,  Asthma  i 
Immunology  Annual  Meeting. 

3)  Asmus  MJ,  et  al.  Am  J  Respir  Cril  Care  Med  2001  ;163  (5):A444. 

www.respironics.com 


PEOPLE.  PRODU 


CHRONIC  RESPIRATORY 
MANAGEMENT  PROGRAM 


RESPIRATORV  INSUFFICIENCY  « 
FAILURE  MANAGEMENT  PROGRAM 


ASTHMA,  ALLERGY  «  SINUSITIS 
MANAGEMENT  PROGRAM 


INFANT  MANAGEMENT  PROGRAM 


Respironics  HealthScan  Asthnda  &  Allergy  Products  Customer  Service:  1-800-962-1266  •  724-387-4000 
Respironics  Europe:  -t-aS-IOjl  •55-60-1 9-80  •  Respironics  Asia  Pacific:  -H852-234-342-18 

Circle  1 1 8  on  product  information  cord 


OCOIOI    REV3 


i'he  Most  Trusted  Name  in  Tracheostomy  Tube  Securement 


Security 


I 


z 


T/ve7-3 


Dale®  Tracheostomy 
Tube  Holder  with 
Exclusive  Fastener  Tabs 

•  More  secure  than  twill  ties 

•  Comfortable  cotton-lined 
neckband 

•  Quick  and  easy  to  apply 

•  One  size  fits  most  patients 

•  Prevents  skin  irritation 

•  Latex-free 

Stretch  material  allows  for 
cough  reflex,  accommodates 
edema  and  ensures  a  snug, 
yet  comfortable  fit. 

To  obtain  an  evaluation 
sample  or  to  find  out  more 
about  the  Dale  Tracheostomy 
Tube  Holder,  call  Dale  at 
1-800-343-3980. 


Circle  1 1 5  on  product  information  cord 


Take  Hold  of  Patient  Care 

www.dalemed.com 

©2002  Dale  Medical  Products,  Inc  Punted  in  USA  AO  240 


We've  all  heard  horror  stories  about  patients  who  were  denied  access  to  care  by  their  MCOs. 
Sometimes,  it's  hard  to  separate  fact  from  fiction.  As  a  former  medical  reviewer  for  one  of  the 
nation's  largest  insurers,  Dr  Linda  Peeno  has  the  inside  track  and  will  share  it  with  conven- 
tioneers during  the  opening  ceremonies.  The  subject  of  a  recent  movie  on  Showtime  called 
"Damaged  Care,"  she  has  dedicated  her  life  to  exposing  what  she  calls  "the  menace  of  man- 
aged care." 

Come  hear  what  Dr.  Peeno  has  to  say  about  the  financial  incentives  driving  medical  coverage 
today  and  what  we  ought  to  be  doing  to  create  a  more  equitable  system  for  all. 

As  the  "gold  standard"  of  respiratory  care  meetings  worldwide,  the  AARC  Congress  provides 
you  with  everything  you  need  to  know  to  stay  abreast  of  important  developments  in  the  respira- 
tory care  profession.  It's  your  number  one  convention  destination  for: 

•  The  lowest  cost  of  continuing  education  per  credit! 

•  The  largest  and  most  impressive  Exhibit  Hall,  featuring  the  most  vendors  AND  the  ability  to 
buy  right  onsite. 

•  The  largest  gathering  of  respiratory  experts  in  the  world. 

•  The  most  diverse  and  dynamic  series  of  lectures. 

•  The  largest  presentation  of  original  research  by  RTs. 

•  The  most  opportunities  for  YOU  to  network  with  your  peers. 

Don't  miss  this  opportunity  to  attend  the 
longest-running  respiratory  therapy  show  in  history! 


October  5-8,  2002  •  Tampa  Bay,  Florida 
48th  Annual  International  Respiratory  Congress 


For  more  information,  visit  www.aarc.org 

and  click  on  Tampa  Bay.  Or  call  972-243-2272. 

American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care 

11030  Abies  Lane,  Dallas,  TX  75229 


Vrato*"" 


Visit  www.visittampabay.com  for  up-to-date  information  about  things  to  see  and  do  in  Tampa  Bay. 


at .  :'f 


Kibri 


1^1 


P/m 


TM 


J\N\ 


# 


Combination  Valved  Holding  Cliamber 
("VHC")  and  PEP  Device 


II 


Adjustable  PEP  device 

built  into  chamber  exhalation  valve 

Tested  with  commonly  used 
pMDI  formulations 

Six  PEP  settings 

Removable  adapter  for  pressure 
manometer  attachment  to  determine 
initial  setting 


The  new  AeroPEP Plus"  VHC  gives  you  two  treatments  in  one  device. 


ZENITHJILm. 
AWARD  2001 


nrionaghan.. 

Monaghan  Medical  Corporation 

PO  Box  2805.  Plattsburgh,  NY  12901-0299 
Customer  Service  800-833-9653 
www.monaghanmed.com 


Circle  1 14  on  product  information  cord 


I 


JULY   2002   /   VOLUME   47   /   NUMBER    7 


FOR  INFORMATION, 
CONTACT: 

AARC  Membership 
or  Other  AARC  Services 

American  Association  for 

Respiratory  Care 

11030  Abies  Ln 

Dallas  TX  75229-4593 

(972)  243-2272  •  Fax  (972)  484-2720 

tittp://www.aarc.org 

Therapist  Registration  or 
Technician  Certification 

National  Board  tor  Respiratory 

Care 

8310Nieman  Rd 

LenexaKS  66214 

(91 3)  599-4200  •  Fax  (91 3)  541  -01 56 

http://www,nbrc,org 

Accreditation  of  Education 
Programs 

Committee  on  Accreditation  for 

Respiratory  Care 

1701  W  Euless  Blvd.  Suite  300 

Euless  TX  76040 

(817)  283-2835  •  Fax  (817)  354-8519 

tittpV/www, coarc.com 

Grants.  Scholarships. 
Community  Projects 

American  Respiratory  Care 

Foundation 

11030  Abies  Ln 

Dallas  TX  75229-4593 

(972)  243-2272  •  Fax  (972)  484-2720 

AARC  Government  Affairs  Office 

Director  of  Govt  Affairs 

Jill  Eicher 

1225  King  St,  Second  Floor 

Alexandria  VA  22314 

(703)  548-8538  Fax  (703)  548-8499 

eicher@aarc.org 

Director  of  State  Govt  Affairs 
Cheryl  West  MHA 
8630  Braeswood  Pt.  #2 
Colorado  Springs.  CO  80920 
(719)  535-9970  west@aarc, org 


RE/PIRATORy 
Q\RE 


RtSIMK\r<)R\  CVRE  (ISSN  0020-1324.  USPS  0489- 
190)  IS  published  monthl>  by  Daedalus  Enierprises  Inc,  al 
1 1030  Abies  Lane.  Dallas  TX  75229-4593.  for  (he  .\mer- 
ican  Association  tor  Respiraiorv  Carc-  One  volume  is 
published  per  year  beginning  each  January  Subscription 
rates  are  S75  per  year  in  the  US;  SMO  in  all  other  countries 
(for  airmail,  add  $94) 

The  contents  oC  the  Jounial  are  indexed  in  liuhw 
A/fJ/(i(.\7MEDLINE.  Hospital  and  Health  Administralion 
Index.  Cumulative  Index  to  Nursing  and  Allied  Health 
Literature.  EMBASE/Excerpla  Medica.  and  RNdex  Li* 
brary  Edition.  An  abridged  version  ot  RhSPlR.ATORV 
Care  is  also  published  in  Japanese,  with  permission  from 
Daedalus  Enterpnses  Inc. 

Periodicals  postage  paid  ai  Dallas  TX  and  at  addiiiona! 
mailing  offices.  POSTMASTER:  Send  address  changes  to 
RESPIRATORY  CaRE.  Membership  Office.  Daedalus  En- 
terprises Inc.  1 1030  Abies  Lane.  Dallas  TX  75229-4593. 

©^rinled  on  acid-free  paper. 

Printed  in  the  Uniitii  Siutcs  of  Amvrua 

Cnn\rwht  ©  2002.  h\  Daedalus  FjUcrnrises  Inc. 


17TH  ANNUAL 

NEW  HORIZONS  SYMPOSIUM: 

AIRWAY  CLEARANCE  TECHNIQUES 

GUEST  EDITORS 

James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FAARC 
^ Bruce  K  Rubin  MEngr  MD  FAARC 


EDITORIALS 


Secretion  Clearance  Techniques:  Absence  of  Proof  e^r  Proof  o\'  Absence? 

h\  Di'iiu  R  Hew — Bosion.  Md.ssachu.selfs 


757 


FOREWORD 


New  Horizons  in  Respiratory  Care;  Airway  Clearance  Techniques 

hy  James  B  Fink — Mounlain  View.  California 

and  Bruce  K  Rubin — Winston-Salem.  North  Carolina 


759 


SYMPOSIUM  PAPERS 


Physiology  of  Airway  Mucus  Clearance 

h\  Bruce  K  Rubin — Winston-Salem,  North  Carolina 

Positioning  Versus  Postural  Drainage 

by  James  B  Fink — Mountain  View.  California 

Airway  Physiology.  Autogenic  Drainage,  and  Active  Cycle  of  Breathing 

by  Craig  D  Lapin — Hartford,  Connecticut 

Positive  Pressure  Techniques  for  Airway  Clearance 

by  James  B  Fink — Mounlain  Vien:  California 

High-Frequency  Oscillation  of  the  Airway  and  Chest  Wall 

by  Jtunes  B  Fink — Mountain  View.  California 

and  Michael  J  Mahlmeister — San  Mateo.  California 

Airway  Clearance  Techniques  for  the  Patient  with  an  Artificial  Airway 

by  Robert  M  Lewis — Atlanta.  Geori^ia 

The  Pharmacologic  Approach  to  Airway  Clearance:  Mucoactive  Agents 

by  Bruce  K  Rubin — Winston-Salem.  North  Carolina 

Airway  Clearance  Strategies  for  the  Pediatric  Patient 

by  Kalhryn  L  Davidson — Salt  Lake  City.  Utah 


761 
769 
778 
786 

797 
808 
818 
823 


SIEMENS 


Ask  1,000  clinicians  what  they'd  like  in  a 
ventilation  system,  and  what  do  you  get? 


I 


% 


The  new 


Servo^'' 


^ 


All  patient  categories.  •  ^ 

New  procedures.  New  possibilities. 


Who  knows  more  about  ventilator  requirements  than  you, 
the  person  who  has  to  live  and  work  with  them  every  day. 
That's  why  we  developed  our  new  ventilation  ^. 

platform  in  close  collaboration  with  clinicians. 


1 1 


Jf 


The  result:  inspiration, The  new  Servo'  is 
a  single  platform  which  builds  to  treat  a 
complete  range  of  patient  categories  from  neonate  and 
pediatric  to  adult.  Choose  the  specification  that's  right 
for  your  needs  today:  add  applications  to 
upgrade  for  tomorrow.  It  offers  the  tools  to 
assist  in  different  treatment  methodologies, 
like  The  Open  Lung  Concept.'  It's  also 

iiple  to  use.  The  user  interface  gives  direct 


access  to  important  settings,  letting  you  choose  between 
touch  screen,  knobs  and  a  dial.  Servo/'  has  a  unique  'Lift  Out' 
design  which  simplifies  the  process  of  transporting  patients, 
ensuring  bedside  ventilatory  treatment  quality 
throughout  the  entire  chain  of  critical  care. 


se 


We  even  streamlined  the  running  costs.  Long 
service  intervals;  fast  start-up;  easy  training 
and  operation:  they  all  add  up  to  a  more 
cost  efficient,  capable  platform. 


^. 


1 


■•■^    Everything  that  you  said  you  wanted, 
and  more.  The  new  Servo'.  Inspired  by  you. 
For  more  information:  www.servo-i.com 


\ 


The  following  Servo' '  options  are  not  available  in  the  U.S,A. 
Open  Lung  Tool 
Open  Lung  Concept'" 


Siemens  medical 

Solutions  that  help 


Circle  1 1 2  on  product  information  card 


I 


CONTINUED. 


ALSO 
IN  THIS  ISSUE 

AARC  Membership 
839  Application 


746 

Abstracts  from 
Other  Journals 

848 

Advertisers  Index 
&  Help  Lines 

848 

Author 
Index 

847 

Calendar 
of  Events 

841 

Manuscript 
Preparation  Guide 

845 

Hevi  Products 

846 


Notices 


BOOKS,  FILMS,  TAPES,  &  SOFTWARE 

PlissiothLMapy  in  Rcspiraldiy  Care:  An  lividencc-Bascd  Approach 
to  Respiratory  and  Cardiac  Management.  3rd  ed  (Hough  A) 

rcr/ciiri/  h\-  Dennis  C  Siihiixh   -Milwaukee.  Wi\eonsin 

Mosby's  Complementary  &  Alternative  Medicine:  A  Research-Based 
Approach  (Freeman  LW,  Lawlis  GF) 

reviewed  h\  Jim  BlairSeatlle.  Wu.shin^fiin 

Pharmacology  in  Respiratory  Care  (Levine  SR,  McLaughlin  AJ  Jr) 

reviewed  In  Hni;lt  S  Malhewson — Kansas  City.  Kansas 
Carbon  Monoxide  Toxicity  (Penney  DG,  editor) 

reviewed  I'v  Liiulell  K  Weaver—Sail  Lake  City.  Utah 

Respiratory  Care  Sciences:  An  Integrated  Approach.  3rd  ed 
(Wojciechowski  WV) 

reviewed  h\  Conrad  Colhy— Boise.  Idaho 

Pediatric  Pulnionology  Pearls  (Inselman  LS) 
reviewed  bv  Michelle  M  Cloiitier— Hartford.  Connecticut 

Teaching  in  Your  Office:  A  Guide  to  Instructing  Medical  Students 
and  Residents  (Alguire  PC,  DeWitt  DE.  Pinsky  LE.  Ferenchick  GS) 

reviewed  In  Mark  G  Graham — Philadelphia.  Pennsylvania 


AARC'S  INTERNATIONAL 
RESPIRATORY  CONGRESS 

OCTOBER  5-8,  2002 


829 

829 
830 
831 

833 
833 

834 


RE/PIRATORy 
CARE 


A  Monthly  Science  Journal 
Established  in  1956 

The  Official  Journal  of  the 

American  Association  for 

Respiratory  Care 


This  year's  International  Respiratory 

Congress  in  Tampa,  Florida,  promises 

to  offer  many  unique  cultural,  educational, 

and  other  entertaining  experiences  to 

its  attendees.  Come  to  Tampa  for  one 

of  the  most  breathtaking  educational 

events  of  the  year.  Be  sure  to  mark 

your  2002  calendar  for  the  next  AARC 

Congress,  October  5-8,  2002. 


Medipure 


\U  UUAI    r.ASl-.S 


I       CAN'T      SEE       IT 


I       CAN'T       FEEL       IT 


I       CAN'T       SMELL       IT. 


OKAY,     SO      HOW      DO      I       BUY      IT? 


A  top  oxygen  choice  of  healthcare  administrators. 

Across  the  U.S.,  Medipure"'  medical  gases  are  ciiosen  because 
they  deliver  the  benefits  healthcare  facilities  need  most.  Talk 
with  your  Praxair  representative,  Praxair  authorized  distributor 
or  call  1-800-299-7977  ext.  6431  today 


PRAXAIR,  llic  Fl.c IWING  AIRSTRF.AM  .Ir.ign  CRAB  'N  <KI  and  MEUII'URE 
arc  irjdcmarktor  icpttcred  irjifciiurktofPr-iKjir  TKhnolitn,  [nc  in  the  UnitnlSutcx 
anil/ut  other  cuuntnc^-  O  2IMI2  Prjs.nr  Tc<hno|(ig>.  Inc.  All  ricliu  ttvncil. 


For  many  purchasing  agents, 
hospital  administrators  and 
materials  managers,  thats  the 
easiest  question  they  have  to 

ANSWER   ALL   DAY.    ThEY   LOOK    FOR 

Medipure'^'  brand  medical  oxygen 
1  ROM  Praxair.  Doing  so  guarantees 
medical  oxygen  of  superior  purity, 
consistency,  and  compliance  with 
all  safety  regulations.  Because 
it's  from  Praxair,  it  assures  you'll 
always  benefit  from  innovations, 
SUCH  as  the  Gra/.7  '/?  Go®  portable 
oxygen  system-and  our  extensive 
experience  in  both  hospital  and 

HOMECARE   SERVICES.  MedipUie ...IT 
ALL   ADDS    UP   TO   ONE    BFNFFIT   YOL' 
REALLY   CANT    PIT   A    PRICE   ON: 

p  E  A c  E  -  o  F  -  M I N  D .  Bc  siirc.  Medipurel" 


IPRjaUR 


Circle  1 1 3  on  product  information  card 


EDITORIAL  OFFICE 

()()0  Ninth  A\emn.'.  Siiilc  702 

Seattle  \V A  yS  104 

(20(i)22.V0.'i?8 

Fax  (206) 223-0563 

www.rcjournal.com 

MANAGING  EDITOR 

R;i\  Maslerrer  RRT  FAARC 


EDITOR  IN  CHIEF 


David  J  Pierson  MD  FAARC 

//i//7'(iM  icn  Miiliciil  Criihr 
i'iii\ci:sil\  of  \Va\luiif;li)ii 
SfcinU'.  Wdsllilliildll 

ASSOCIATE  EDITORS 


Richard  D  Branson  RRT  FAARC 
[  'niversity-  of  Cincmmtti 
Ciminnuti.  Ohio 


Dean  R  Hess  PhD  RRT  FAARC 

Masstulmsetts  General  ihispiuil 
Harvard  University 
Boston.  MasMichusetls 


James  K  Sioller  MD  MSc  FAARC 
The  Cleveland  Clinu  foundalinn 
Cleveland.  Ohio 


ASSISTANT 
EDITOR 


Kathenne  Kreilkanip 


EDITORIAL 
ASSISTANT 


LinJa  Baivus 


COPY  EDITOR 

Matthew  Mero  MA 

PRODUCTION 

Kelly  Piotrowski 


MARKETING 

Dale  L  Gnttlihs 
Director  of  Market m^ 

Tim  Goldsbury  RRT 
Director.  Advertising  Sales 

Beth  Binkley 

Advertising  Assistant 

PUBLISHER 

.Sam  P  Giordano  MBA 
RRT  FAARC 

RE/PIRATORy 
QVRE 

A  Monthly  Science  Journal 
Established  in  1956 

The  Official  Journal  of  the 

American  Association  for 

Respiratory  Care 


Charle^  G  Durhin  Jr  MD  FAARC 
L'nivi-r\it\  ct  Vu\;inta 
ChitrlolU'Svillt'.  \  'iii;inui 


EDITORIAL  BOARD 


Neil  R  Maclntyre  MD  FAARC 
DtiU  Uiiivt'r\lt\ 
Diithiim.  NtuJh  Caroiiiui 


Alexander  B  Adains  MPH  RRT 
FAARC 

Rcf^ionx  HospiUll 
Si  Paid.  Minnesnui 

Thomas  A  Barnes  EdD  RRT 
FAARC 

Niirllicaslfm  Vniwrsity 
Boston.  Maisachiisciis 


Joshua  O  Benditt  MD 

Uiincisily  ofWaslliiiK'o'i 
Seattle.  Wa.'^hiiislon 

Michael  J  Bishop  MD 

University  of  Wasliiiif;i<in 
Seattle.  Washinf;ion 

LIuis  L  Blanch  MD  PhD 
Hospital  lie  Sahailell 
Stihailell.  Siuiiti 

Bartolome  R  Celli  MD 
Tufts  University 
Boston.  Massaelmsetts 

Robert  L  Chatburn  RRT 
FAARC 

University  Hospitals  of  Clevehnul 
Case  We.slern  Re.ser^e  Universit\ 
Cleveland.  Ohio 

Patrick  J  Dunne  MEd  RRT 
FAARC 

Health  Care  Produetions 
Fullerton.  California 

James  B  Fink  MS  RRT  FAARC 

.■\eroCien  hie 

Mountain  View.  California 

John  E  Heffner  MD 

Medual  University  of  South  Carolina 
Charleston.  Simlh  Carolina 

Mark  J  Heuiitt  MD  FAARC 

L  'niversity  of  A  rkansas 
Little  Rock.  Arkansas 

SECTION  EDITORS 


Leonard  D  Hudson  MD 

University  of  Washini>tiin 
Seattle.  Wasliini;lon 

Robert  M  Kacmaiek  PhD  RRT 
FAARC 

Massachiisetls  Oeneial  Hospital 
Harvard  Universitv 
Boston.  Massaehiisetis 

Richard  H  Kallet  MS  RRT 

San  Franciseo  General  Hospital 
Univer.iity  of  Califinnta  San  Franciseo 
San  Francisco,  California 

E  Lucy  Kester  MBA  RRT 
FAARC 

The  Cleveland  Clime  Foundation 
Cleveland.  Ohio 

Max  Kirmse  MD 

University  of  Eriangen-Niirnherg 
Mohrendorf.  Germany 

Toshihiko  Koga  MD  FAARC 
Koga  Instituet  fen- Medical  Research 
Tokyo.  Japan 

Marin  H  Kollef  MD 

Washington  University 
St  Louis.  Missouri 


Constantine  A  Manthous  MD 
Bridgeport  Hospital 
Bridgeport.  Cfmiiectictd 

John  J  Murini  MD 

Universitv  of  Miimesola 
St  Paul.  Minnesota 

Shelley  C  Mishoe  PhD  RRT 
FAARC 

Medical  College  of  Georgia 
Augusta.  Georgia 


Steven  B  Nelson  MSc  RRT 

FAARC 

Overland  Paik.  Kansas 

Ma\o  Pulmonary  Sen-ices 

Rochester.  Mmnesola 

Marcy  F  Petri  ni  PhD 

Ullivcrsilx  of  Mississippi 
.lackson.  Mississippi 

Joseph  L  Rau  PhD  RRT  FAARC 

Georgia  State  University 
.Atlanta,  Georgia 

Catherine  SH  Sassoon  MD 

University  of  California  Inine 
Ijmg  Beach.  California 

John  W  Shigeoka  MD 

Veterans  Administration  Medical  Center 

Salt  hike  Cit\.  Utah 

Eric  J  Stern  MD 
Hai-boniew  Medical  Center 
( Iniversity  of  Washington 
Seattle.  Washington 

Martin  J  Tobin  MD 

Loxola  Universitx 
Chicago.  Illinois 

Jeffrey  J  Ward  MEd 
RRT  FAARC 

.Mayo  Medical  School 
Rochester.  Minnesota 

Robert  L  Wilkins  PhD  RRT 
FAARC 

hima  Linda  I  'nivcruty 
Lama  Linda.  California 


STATISTICAL  CONSULTANT 

Gordon  D  Rubcnfeld  MD  MSc 

University  of  Washington 
Seattle.  Washinglim 


Hughs  MalhcwMin  MD 
Joseph  L  Rau  PhD  RRT  [AARC 
Drug  Capsule 


Charlc  G  In  in  PhD 

C}reg2  L  Ruppcl  Mhd  RRT  RPPT  lAARC 

PFT  Corner 


Richard  D  BranMin  RRT  FAARC 
Roben  S  Campbell  RRT  FAARC 
Kittredgc's  Corner 


Sicven  B  Nelson  MSt 
RRT  FAARC 
RC  Web  Sites 


Jon  NiKcsiuen  PhD  RRT  FAARC 
Ken  Hargetl  RRT 
Graphics  Comer 


Patricia  Ann  Doorley  MS  RRT  FAARC 
Charles  G  Durhin  Jr  MD  FAARC 
Test  Your  Radiologic  Skill 


Abstracts 


Summaries  of  Pertinent  Articles  in  Other  Journals 


Editorials,  Commentaries,  and  Reviews  to  Note 

Can  Health  Care  Costs  Be  Reduced  l)>  IJniiting  Intensive  Care  at  the  Knd  of  Life? — luce 
JM,  RulxTilckKM)  All)  J  Rcpir  Crit  Care  Med  2(10:  Mar  ]5;I6.S(6|:75()-7S4. 

Future  Research  Directions  in  Chronic  Obstructive  Pulmonary  Disease — Croxton  TL.  Wein- 
inann  GG,  Senior  RM,  HoiJal  JR  Am  J  RespirCril  Care  Med  2002  Mar  15:165(6):838-844. 

Clinical  Practice.  Acute  Exacerbations  of  Chronic  Obstructive  Pulmonary  Disease — Stoller 

JK.  N  i-.ngi  J  Med  2002  Mar  28;346(  1 3):9SX-994. 

Should  Family  Members  Be  Present  During  Cardiopulmonary  Resuscitation? — Tsai  E.  N 
Engl  J  Med  2002  Mar  28;346(  LM;  10! 4- 1 02 1 . 

Air  Pollution  and  Short  Term  Mortality  (ediluriall — Hennessy  E.  BMJ     2002  Mar 
23;324(7339l:691-692. 

Saving  Face:  Better  Interfaces  for  Noninvasive  Ventilation — Hill  S  Intensive  Care  Med  2002 
Mar;28(  3 1:227-229. 

Evidence-Based  Medicine  or  Fuzzy  Logic:  What  Is  Best  for  ARDS  Management? — Dreyfuss 
D.  Saumon  G.  Intensive  Care  Med  2002  Mar;28(3):230-234. 

F'videncc-Based  Medicine  in  the  Therapy  of  the  Acute  Respiratory  Distress  Syndrome — 

K(ipp  R,  Kuhlen  R.  Max  M.  Rossaint  R.  Intensive  Care  Med  2002  Mar;28(3):244-255. 


Lung  Abscess  in  Adults:  Clinical  Comparison  of  Immunocompro- 
mised to  Non-Immunocompromised  Patients — Mansharaniani  N.  Bal- 
achandran  D.  Delaney  D.  Zibrak  JD,  Silvestri  RC.  Koziel  H.  Respir  Med 
2002  Mar;9f>(3):178-18.'i. 

Information  related  to  the  clinical  characteristics  and  isolated  microbes 
associated  with  lung  abscesses  comparing  immunocompromised  (IC)  to 
non-immunocompromised  (non-IC)  patients  is  limited.  A  retrospective 
review  for  1984-1996  identified  34  consecutive  adult  cases  of  lung 
abscess  (representing  0.2'7f  of  all  cases  of  pneumonia),  including  10  non- 
IC  and  24  IC  patients.  Comparison  of  age.  gender,  tobacco  use,  pre-exist- 
ing pulmonary  disease  or  recognized  aspiration  risk  factors  were  not  sig- 
nificantly different  between  the  two  groups.  Upper  lobe  involvement 
accounted  for  the  majority  of  cases,  although  multi-iobe  involvement  was 
limited  to  IC  patients.  There  were  no  differences  in  the  need  for  surgical 
intervention,  and  mortality  was  very  low  for  both  groups.  Anaerobes 
were  the  most  frequent  isolates  for  non-IC  patients  (30%),  whereas  aer- 
obes were  the  most  frequent  isolate  for  IC  patients  (63%).  Importantly, 
certain  organisms  were  exclusively  isolated  in  the  IC  group  and  multiple 
isolates  were  obtained  only  from  the  IC  patients.Thus.  comparing  non-IC 
to  IC  patients,  clinical  characteristics  may  be  similar  whereas  important 
differences  may  exist  in  the  microbiology  associated  with  lung  abscess. 
These  findings  have  important  implications  for  the  clinical  management 
of  these  patient  groups,  and  support  a  strategy  to  aggressively  identify 
microbial  agents  in  abscess  material. 

Inipacl  of  a  Family  Information  I.eatlet  on  FTfectiveness  of  Informa- 
tion Provided  to  Family  Members  of  Intensive  Care  Unit  Patients:  A 
Multicentcr,  Prospective,  Randonii/,cd,  Controlird  Trial — A/oulay  E, 
Pochard  H,  Chevret  .S.  Jourdain  M,  Bornslain  C,  Wernet  A,  el  al.  Am  J 
RespirCnt  Care  Med  2002  Feb  15;lh.'S(4l:438-442. 


Comprehension  and  satisfaction  are  relevant  criteria  for  evaluating  the 
effectiveness  of  information  provided  to  family  members  of  intensive 
care  unit  (ICU)  patients.  We  performed  a  prospective  randomized  trial  in 
34  French  ICUs  to  compare  comprehension  of  diagnosis,  prognosis,  treat- 
ment, and  satisfaction  with  information  provided  by  ICU  caregivers,  in 
ICU  patient  family  representatives  who  did  (n  =  871  or  did  not  (n  =  88) 
receive  a  family  information  leaflet  (FID  in  addition  to  standard  informa- 
lion.  An  FIL  designed  specifically  for  this  study  was  delivered  at  the  first 
visit  of  the  family  representative:  it  pro\  ided  general  information  on  the 
ICU  and  hospital,  the  name  of  the  ICU  physician  caring  for  the  patient,  a 
diagram  of  a  typical  ICU  room  with  the  names  of  all  the  devices,  and  a 
glossary  of  12  terms  commonly  used  in  ICUs.  Characteristics  of  the 
ICUs,  patients,  and  family  representatives  were  similar  in  the  two  groups. 
The  FIL  reduced  the  proportion  of  family  members  with  poor  compre- 
hension from  40.9%  to  1 1.5%  (p  <  0.0001).  In  the  representatives  with 
good  comprehension,  the  FIL  was  associated  with  significantly  better  sat- 
isfaction (21  [  1 8  to  24,  quartilesj  versus  27  |24  to  29,  qu;u-tiles],  p  =  0.01 ). 
These  results  indicate  that  ICU  caregivers  should  consider  using  an  FIL 
to  improve  the  effectiveness  of  the  information  lhe\  impart  to  families. 

Incidence  and  Mortality  of  .Acute  Lung  Injury  and  the  .\cutc  Respi- 
ratory Distress  Syndrome  in  Three  .Australian  States — Bersten  AD, 
Edibam  C,  Hunt  T,  Moran  J,  Group  TA.  Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  2002 

Feb  l5;16.'>(4):443-448. 

To  determine  the  incidence  and  28-d  mortality  rale  for  acute  lung  injury 
(.ALl)  and  acute  respiratory  distress  syndrome  (ARDS)  using  the  1994 
American-European  Consensus  Conference  definitions,  ue  prospectively 
screened  every  admission  to  all  2 1  adult  intensive  care  units  in  the  States 
of  South  Australia.  Western  Australia,  and  Tasmania  (total  population 
older  than  I. 'i  yr  of  age  estimated  as  2,941,137),  betvveen  October  1  and 
November  30.  1999.  A  total  of  1,977  admissions  were  screened  of  which 


746 


Respirators  Care  .  Juls  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


SETTING  the  STANDARD /or  AIRWAY  CLEARANCE. 


Air-pulse 
generator 


Full  vest 


Chest  vest 
The  Vest™  Airway  Clearance  System 


The  Vest™  system  consists  of  an  inflatable  vest  connected  by  tubes  to  an  air-pulse  generator.  The 
generator  rapidly  inflates  and  deflates  the  vest,  compressing  and  releasing  the  chest  wall.  This 
technology  is  called  high-frequency  chest  wall  oscillation  (HFCWO). 

More  than  3,000  physicians  have  prescribed  The  Vest  system  for  20,000  patients  with  respiratory 
complications  associated  with  more  than  280  diseases  and  conditions. 

The  Vest  system  sets  the  standard  for  airway  clearance  therapy: 

•  Widely  accepted 

•  Evidence-based 

•  Easy  to  use 

-  All  lobes  of  the  lungs  treated  simultaneously 

-  Positioning  not  required 

-  Breathing  techniques  not  required 

-  Aerosolized  treatments  can  be  delivered  simultaneously 

•  Suitable  for  home  and  hospital  use 

•  Patient  training  pro\aded 

•  De\1ce  meter  tracks  treatment  adherence 

•  Payer  acceptance 

•  Lifetime  warranty 


Vest 

Airway  Clearance  System 


So  everyone  can  hrenlhc  a  Utile  easier 

www.thevest.com 


For  more  information,  call  Advanced  Respiratory  at  1  -800-426-4224  or  visit  www.thevest.com. 

The  Vest   and  "So  even'one  can  breathe  a  little  easier"  are  trademarks  or  registered  trademarks  of  Advanced  Respiratory. 
©  2001-2002  Advanced  Respiratory    500970  AE  06/02 

Circle  122  on  product  information  card 


Abstracts 


IfiS  developed  Al.l  and  I4S  developed  ARDS.  v\hich  represents  a  first 
incidence  of  34  and  28  cases  per  l(M).0()0  per  annum,  respectively.  The 
respective  28-d  mortality  rates  were  i29c  and  .34%.  The  most  common 
predisposing  factors  for  ALI  were  nonpulmonary  sepsis  (319'r)  and  pneu- 
monia {2^'7r).  Although  the  incidences  of  AI.I  and  ARD.S  are  higher  and 
the  mortality  rates  are  lower  than  those  reported  from  studies  in  other 
countries,  multicenter  international  studies  are  required  to  exclude 
methodological  differences  as  the  cause  for  this  finding. 

Improved  .Arterial  Oxygenation  with  Biologically  \  ariable  or  Frac- 
tal \  entihition  I'sing  Low  Tidal  \'oliime.s  in  a  Porcine  Model  of  .Acute 
Respiratory  Distress  Syndrome — Boker  A.  Ruth  Ciraham  M.  Wallcy 
KR.  McManus  BM,  Girling  LG,  Walker  E,  et  al.  Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care 
Med  2002  Feh  l-'i;l6.'S(4l:4.';6-462. 

We  compared  biologically  variable  ventilation  (Vhv;  n  =  9)  with  control 
mode  venlilalion  (V^;  n  =  8)  at  low  tidal  volume  (  VtI — initial  6  mL/kg — 
in  a  porcine  model  of  acute  respiratory  distress  syndrome  (ARDS). 
Hemodynamics,  respiratory  gases,  airway  pressures,  and  Vx  data  were 
measured.  Static  P-V  curves  were  generated  at .")  h.  Inlerleukin  (lL)-8  and 
IL-10  were  measured  in  serum  and  tracheal  aspirate.  By  .^  h.  higher  PaO; 
(173  ±  30  mm  Hg  versus  1 19  ±  23  mm  Hg;  mean  ±  SD:  p  <  0.0001  group 
xtime  interaction  |G  x  T]),  lower  shunt  fraction  (6  ±  1%  versus  9  ±3%;  p 
=  0.0026.  G  X  T)  at  lower  peak  airway  pressure  (2 1  ±  2  versus  24  ±  1  cm 
H:0;  p  =  0.0342;  G  x  T)  occurred  with  Vbi-  IL-8  concentrations  in  tra- 
cheal aspirate  and  wet:dry  weight  ratios  were  inversely  related:  p  =  0.01 1 . 
With  V^,  IL-8  concentrations  were  3.75-fold  greater  at  wet:dry  weight 
ratio  of  10.  IL-10  concentrations  did  not  differ  between  groups.  In  both 
groups,  ventilation  was  on  the  linear  portion  of  the  P-V  curve.  With  Vbv. 
Vt  variability  demonstrated  an  inverse  power  law  indicating  fractal 
behavior.  In  this  model  of  ARDS,  Vbv  improved  PaO;  at  lower  peak  air- 
way pressure  and  IL-8  levels  compared  with  V^. 

Kffect  of  Lung  Volume  Reduction  Surgery  for  Severe  Emphysema  on 
Right  \  entricular  Function — Mineo  TC.  Pompeo  E.  Rogliani  P.  Dauri 
M.  Turani  F.  Bollero  P,  Magliocchetti  N.  .Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med 
2002  Feb  I.5;I65(4):489-4'M. 

Lung  volume  reduction  surgery  (LVRS)  can  improve  the  functional 
capacity  of  selected  patients  with  severe  emphysema.  Hypothesized 
physiologic  effects  of  LVRS  include  an  improvement  in  right  ventricular 
function,  although  this  has  not  been  investigated  in  detail.  To  help  clarify 
this  issue,  we  used  fast-thermistor  thermodilulion  at  rest  and  during  sub- 
ma.ximal  upright  exercise  in  12  patients,  before  and  6  mo  after  bilateral 
LVRS.  Preoperative^,  all  patients  had  severe  airflow  obstruction,  with  a 
mean  FEV,  of  0.69  L  and  an  RV-to-TLC  ratio  of  0.67.  Six  months  after 
LVRS.  significant  improvements  occurred  in  respiratory  function  mea- 
sures (-1-0.39  L  in  FEV,.  p  <  0.002;  and  -0. 15  in  RV/TLC  ratio,  p  <  0.002) 
and  in  right  ventricular  function  indexes  measured  at  rest  (■(■0.21  L  in  car- 
diac index  |CI|,  p  <  0.01;  and  +i.O  mL  in  stroke  volume,  p  <  0.01)  and 
during  exercise  (■hO.9  L  in  CI,  p  <  0.002;  ■•■10.0  niL  in  stroke  volume 
index,  p  <  0.002;  and  -(-20'/f  in  ejection  fraction  |EF],  p  <  0.002).  A  sig^ 
nificant  correlation  was  found  between  pre^  to  postoperative  changes  in 
the  EF  response  to  exercise  and  changes  in  the  RV/TLC  ratio  (R  =  -0.68; 
p  =  (1.01 ).  We  conclude  thai  a  significant  improvement  in  right  ventricular 
performance,  particularly  during  exercise,  can  occur  6  mo  after  bilaleral 
LVR.S. 

Pulmonary  Function.  Body  Composition,  and  Protein  Catabolism  in 
Adults  «ilh  Cystic  Fibrosis-  loiicscii  .A.A.  Nixon  l,S,  Lu/io  S.  Lewls- 
Jenkins  V.  Evans  WD.  Slonc  MD.  ct  al.  Am  J  Respn Crit  Care  Med  2002 
Feb  l5;l65l4l:495-.5()(). 

Increased  survival  in  cystic  fibrosis  (CF)  is  associated  with  bone  thin- 
ning and  fat-free  mass  (FFM)  loss.  We  hypothesized  that  the  se\erity  of 


lung  disease  would  be  associated  with  increased  protein  catabolism  and 
systemic  inflammatory  status  in  clinically  stable  patients.  Forty  adults 
with  CF  and  22  age-matched  healthy  subjects  were  studied.  Body  com- 
position was  determined  by  dual-energy  X-ray  absorptiometry.  Urinary 
pseudouridine  (PSU).  a  marker  of  protein  breakdown,  and  cross-linked 
N-telopeptides  of  type  I  collagen  (NTx),  a  marker  of  bone  connective 
tissue  breakdown,  serum  tumor  necrosis  factor  (TNF)-a,  interleukin 
(lLl-6,  and  their  soluble  receptors  were  measured.  A  3-d  food  intake 
diary  revealed  21  patients  had  a  low  energy  intake.  Excretion  of  PSU  (p 
=  0.019)  and  NTx  (p  <  0.01 )  was  increased  in  patients  and  was  inversely 
related  to  FEV,;  PSU  (r  =  -  0.53,  p  =  0.001 )  and  NTx  (r  =  -  0.43.  p  < 
0.01 ).  Increased  excretion  of  PSU  and  NTx  (p  <  0.05  for  both)  was  also 
related  to  a  low  FFM.  All  inflammatory  mediators  were  greater  in 
patients  and  were  related  to  PSU  and  NTx.  Clinically  stable  adults  were 
catabolic  with  both  cellular  and  connective  tissue  protein  breakdown, 
which  was  related  to  lung  disease  severity,  systemic  inflammation,  and 
body  composition. 

Screening  for  Lung  Cancer  » ith  Low  -Dose  Spiral  Computed  Tomog- 
raphy— Swensen  SJ.  Jett  JR.  Sloan  JA,  Midthun  DE,  Hartman  TE.  Sykes 
AM,  et  al.  Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  2002  Feb  I5;165(4);508-513. 

Studies  suggest  that  screening  with  spiral  computed  tomography  can 
detect  lung  cancers  at  a  smaller  size  and  earlier  stage  than  chest  radiogra- 
phy can.  To  evaluate  low -radiation-dose  spiral  computed  tomography 
and  sputum  cytology  in  screening  for  lung  cancer,  we  enrolled  1.520  indi- 
\ idnals  aged  50  >r  or  older  who  had  smoked  20  pack-years  or  more  in  a 
prospective  cohort  study.  One  year  after  baseline  scanning,  2,244  uncal- 
cified  lung  nodules  were  identified  in  1,000  participants  (66%).  Twenty- 
five  cases  of  lung  cancer  were  diagnosed  (22  prevalence.  3  incidence). 
Computed  tomography  alone  detected  23  cases;  sputum  cytology  alone 
delected  2  cases.  Cell  types  were:  squamous  cell.  6:  adenocarcinoma  or 
bronchioalveolar.  15:  large  cell,  I;  small  cell.  3.  Twenty-two  patients 
underwent  curative  surgical  resection.  Seven  benign  nodules  were 
resected.  The  mean  size  of  the  non-small  cell  cancers  detected  by  com- 
puted tomography  was  17  mm  (median.  13  mm).  The  postsurgical  stage 
was  lA.  13:  IB.  1:  IIA.  5:  IIB.  1:  IIIA.  2:  limited.  3.  Twelve  (57%)  of  the 
21  non-small  cell  cancers  detected  by  computed  tomography  were  stage 
lA  at  diagnosis.  Computed  tomography  can  detect  early-stage  lung  can- 
cers. The  rate  of  benign  nodule  detection  is  high. 

Nosocomial  Infections  in  a  Neonatal  Intensive  Care  Unit:  Incidence 
and  Risk  Factors — Nagata  E,  Brito  AS,  Matsuo  T.  .Am  J  Infect  Control 
2002  Feb:.3()(l):26-3I. 

BACKGROUND:  Nosocomial  infections  (NIs)  have  become  a  matter  of 
major  concern  in  neonatal  intensive  care  units  (NICUs).  The  objectives  of 
this  study  were  to  determine  the  incidence  rate  and  the  most  frequent  sites 
of  infection  in  a  Brazilian  NICU  from  January  1 999  to  March  2000  and  to 
study  the  risk  factors  for  NIs.  METHODS:  A  cohort  study  w  as  carried  out 
in  which  225  neonates  who  remained  at  least  24  hours  in  the  NICU  were 
followed-up;  neonates  with  NIs  were  identified,  and  the  presence  of  risk 
factors  was  studied.  Results  were  submitted  to  X"  distribution. 
RESULTS:  The  incidence  rate  and  the  incidence  density  rate  were  50.7% 
and  62  infections  per  1000  patient-days,  respectively.  In  order  of  fre- 
quency, the  sites  of  infection  were:  pneumonia  (40.3%),  primary  blood- 
stream (16.7%).  skin  and  .soft  tissue  (14.9%  ).  and  meningitis  (9.6%  ).  The 
following  risk  factors  were  associated  with  NIs  (p  <0.05):  birth  weight, 
gestational  age.  mechanical  ventilation,  total  parenteral  nutrition,  umbili- 
cal catheter,  use  of  antibiotics,  and  intubation  in  the  delivery  room.  CON- 
CLUSION: Risk  factors  were  similar  to  those  reported  by  other  authors. 
However,  incidence  rales  of  infections  in  our  NICU  were  much  higher, 
possibly  because  of  different  methodologies  and  the  adopted  criteria  for 
the  classification  of  NIs. 


748 


RESPIRATOR')  Care  .  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Abstracts 


Surveillance  of  Ventilator-Associated  I'lU'iinionia  in  \it)-I,o«- 
Birth-WeiKhl  Infants— Cunicri)  L,  Avers  I.W.  Milkr  RR.  Segiiin  III 
Coley  Hn  Am  J  Intecl  Control  2(X)2  Feb;3()(  1  );3:-39. 

BACKGROUND:  Surveillance  of  ventilator-associateJ  piieunioni.i 
(VAP)  is  an  essential  part  of  quality  patient  care.  Very-low-birth-weighi 
(VI.BW)  infants,  many  with  tracheal  microbial  colonization  and  bron- 
chopulmonary dysplasia  (BPDl.  comprise  a  difficult  group  in  whom  to 
make  a  diagnosis  of  pneumonia  with  the  Centers  for  Disease  Control  anil 
Prevention  (CDCl  criteria  tor  inlants  younger  than  I  year.  OBJbCTIVI 
Our  objective  was  to  retrospectively  compare  VAP  surveillance  diag- 
noses made  by  the  hospital  infection  control  practitioner  (ICP)  with  those 
made  by  a  panel  of  experts  with  the  same  clinical  and  laboratory  evidence 
and  supportive  radiologic  data.  A  secondary  objective  was  to  compare 
radiologic  diagnosis  of  pneumonia  made  by  the  general  hospital  radiolo- 
gists, by  the  panel  of  experts,  and  by  a  pediatric  radiologist  from  another 
hospital.  Study  Population:  Thirty-seven  VLBW  infants  identified  as  at 
nsk  for  VAP  by  the  ICP  on  the  basis  of  a  positive  bacterial  tracheal  cul- 
ture and  the  application  of  CDC  criteria  for  the  definition  of  pneumonia 
were  studied.  METHODS:  Clinical  and  laboratory  evidence  and  routine 
radiologic  reports  made  by  the  general  radiologist  were  reviewed  inde- 
pendently by  a  panel  of  experts  composed  of  .^  experienced  neonatolo- 
gists.  Chest  x-rays  from  the  day  before,  day  of.  and  day  after  the  surveil- 
lance date  were  reviewed  separately  by  the  3  neonatologists  and  also  by  a 
pediatric  radiologist.  RESULTS:  After  inter-reader  reliability  was  found 
satisfactory  (kappa's  coefficient,  0.47-0.75;  p  <0.05),  the  panel  of  neona- 
tologists determined  that  the  37  VLBW  infants  represented  4  distinct 
clinical  categories.  Group  1  comprised  12  airway-colonized  infants,  aged 
14  to  30  days,  who  on  the  surveillance  date,  albeit  intubated,  were  asymp- 
tomatic, not  treated  with  antibiotics,  and  survived.  Group  2  comprised  1 1 
ainv  ay -colonized  infants,  aged  7  to  42  days,  who  presented  with  equivo- 
cal clinical,  laboratory,  or  radiologic  signs  of  VAP  and  survived.  Group  3 
comprised  7  airway-colonized  infants,  aged  14  to  21  days,  who  were 
acutely  ill  (3  died)  and  had  clinical  and  laboratory  evidence  of  nosoco- 
mial bloodstream  infection  (BSI)  but  no  radiologic  signs  of  pneumonia. 
Group  4  comprised  7  infants,  aged  14  to  28  days,  who  were  acutely  111  (4 
died)  and  had  clinical  and  laboratory  evidence  of  infection  and  radiologic 
changes  consistent  with  VAP.  Radiologic  Findings:  General  radiologists, 
neonatologists,  and  the  pediatric  radiologist  agreed  that  none  of  the 
asymptomatic  airway-colonized  infants  (Group  I)  had  VAP.  General 
radiologists  reported  signs  suggestive  of  pneumonia  in  8  of  1 1  infants 
(Group  2),  a  finding  not  corroborated  by  the  others.  Everybody  agreed  on 
the  absence  of  radiologic  pneumonia  in  6  of  7  patients  with  nosocomial 
BSI  (Group  3)  and  on  the  presence  of  signs  consistent  with  pneumonia  in 
the  remaining  7  infants  (Group  4).  CONCLLISION:  Surveillance  diagno- 
sis of  VAP  in  VLBW  infants  is  ditTicult  because  current  CDC  definitions 
are  not  specific  for  this  population.  Isolated  positive  tracheal  culture 
alone  does  not  distinguish  between  bacterial  colonization  and  respiratory 
infection.  Clinical  and  laboratory  signs  of  VAP,  mostly  nonspecific,  can 
be  found  in  other  conditions  such  as  bronchopulmonary  dysplasia  and 
nosocomial  BSI.  Routine  radiologic  reports  suggestive  of  pneumonia  in 
airway-colonized  infants  without  definitive  clinical  and  laboratory  evi- 
dence of  infection  could  be  misleading.  To  improve  accuracy,  surveil- 
lance diagnosis  of  VAP  in  special  populations  such  as  VLBW  infants 
should  be  reformulated;  meanwhile.  ICPs  should  seek  consultation  with 
experienced  clinicians  for  interpretation  of  data. 

The  risk  of  Hospitalization  and  Near-Fatal  and  Fatal  Asthma  in 
Relation  to  the  Perception  of  Dyspnea — Magadle  R.  Berar-Yanay  N. 
Weiner  P.  Chest  2002  Feb;121(2):329-333. 

BACKGROUND:  A  life-threatening  asthma  attack  is  still  of  major  con- 
cern. One  of  the  main  goals  in  treating  patients  with  asthma  is  identifica- 
tion of  the  patients  at  nsk  of  having  these  attacks.  It  has  been  shown  that 
patients  who  have  a  near-fatal  asthma  attack  have  a  blunted  perception  of 


FULL  FACE  (Oro-Nasal) 

CPAP/NPPV  Mask 
Series  7600   M^ 

Large 
Medium 
Small 

Extra    Small 
Petite 


Product  Featu, 


•  Five  sizes  to  cover  a  wide  range  of  patient  sizes. 

•  Face  Piece  ivlth  Integral  Sealing  Flange  is  a  single  piece,  made  of  clear, 
soft  silicone  rubber 

•  New  Anatomically  contoured  Face  Mask  Design  iwilh  ribbed  support  for 
a  leak  free  comfortable  fit 

•  Nei«  Safety  Breath-Out  Valve  (SBOV)  for  patient  safety  -  allows  patient  to 
breathe  room  air  if  the  flow  device  malfunctions. 

•  360°  Dual  Swivel  Elbow  Foil  for  improved  patient  freedom  of  movement. 

•  Mask  Air  Vent  holes  dissipate  C02 

•  Quick-Release  Headgear  for  patient  safety,  available  in  two  sizes. 

•  Validated  for  cold  chemical  high  level  disinfection  or  steam  autoclave 
sterilization. 

•  Light  weight,  easy  to  use,  high  quality  masl<  and  headgear 

•  Low  cost,  durable,  reusable.  Pendma  5ioK 

ISO  9001 
/■CISO  13485 


lEN  46001 


HANS  RUDOLPH,  inc. 

MAKERS  OF  RESPIRATORY  VALVES  SINCE  1938 

,,TEL:  (816)  363-5522  U.S.A.  &  CANADA  (800)  456-6695 

FAX:  816-822-1414   E-Mall:  hrierudolphlic.com    www.rudolphkc.com 
7205  CENTRAL,  KANSAS  CITY.  MISSOURI  64114  U.S.A. 

International  Contact,  E.M.MA.  (France)  •  Email:  emmasarKsaol  com 
Phone:  (33)(0)3.44  30  45.28  •  Fax:  (33)(0)3,44  72  60  19 


Circle  1  19  on  product  information  card 

dyspnea  (POD).  The  purpose  of  this  study  is  to  measure  the  POD  in 
patients  with  asthma,  and  to  relate  POD  to  life-threatening  attacks  within 
a  24-month  follow-up  period.  METHODS:  The  POD  was  scored  using 
the  Borg  scale  during  breathing  against  a  progressive  load  at  1-min  inter- 
vals, in  order  to  achieve  mouth  pressure  up  to  W  cm  HjO,  in  1 13  consec- 
utive asthmatic  patients  with  stable  asthma  attending  an  outpatient  clinic. 
All  patients  were  invited  to  regular  follow-up  every  3  months  for  up  to  24 
months,  and  all  hospitalizations  and  near-fatal  and  fatal  asthma  attacks 
were  recorded.  The  prebronchodilator  morning  peak  expiratory  flow  rate 
(PEFR),  daily  regular  treatment,  and  Bi-agonist  consumption  were 
recorded  in  a  diary  card  for  the  first  4  weeks.  RESULTS:  Seventeen 
patients  (15%)  had  high  POD  compared  to  the  nomial  subjects.  67 
patients  1599}-)  had  POD  within  the  normal  range,  and  29  patients  (269!-) 
had  lower-than-normal  POD.  In  the  patients  with  low  POD.  there  was  a 
tendency  for  higher  age,  higher  female/male  ratio,  and  a  longer  duration 
of  disease.  The  rate  of  severe  asthma  was  higher  in  the  low  -POD  group 
than  in  the  normal-POD  group,  but  did  not  differ  from  the  rale  in  the 
high-POD  group.  The  mean  daily  6:-agonist  consumption  in  the  patients 
with  low  POD  was  significantly  lower  (p  <  0.01 )  than  in  the  patients  with 
high  POD,  although  the  mean  PEFR  was  lower  in  the  low-POD  group. 
During  the  2  years  of  follow-up.  the  patients  in  the  low-POD  group  had 
statistically  significantly  more  emergency  department  {EDi  visits,  hospi- 
talizations, near-fatal  asthma  attacks,  and  deaths  compared  to  the  normal- 
POD  and  high-POD  groups.  CONCLUSIONS:  Appro.vimately  26'/  of 
the  referral  subjects  v.  Ith  asthma  had  low  POD  when  compared  to  healthy 
matched  subjects.  Patients  with  low  POD  had  statisticallv  significantlv 
more  ED  visits,  hospitalizations,  near-fatal  asthma  attacks,  and  deaths 


RESPIRATORY  CaRE  •  JULY  2002  VOL  47  NO  7 


749 


Abstracts 


during  the  lolldu-iip  pcnnd.  Rccliii.cd  POD  [iiay  pivtlLsp^sc  palicnls  to  a 
life-lhrealening  allack.  See  the  accompanyiiifi  editorial:  Pink  puffers  vs 
blue  hloaleis  in  iislhma  hhk'  Alilrich  TK.  Cliesi  2002  Feh.l2l(2):313-3I5. 

Oropharyngeal  l)i'!>liititi(iii  in  Stable  COPI) — Mokhlcsi  B,  Logemann 
JA.  RadL-MKikcr  AW.  Slarigl  CA,  Curbridge  TC.  CheM  2002 
Feb;121(2);361-36y. 

STUD^i'  OBJLC  TIVES;  The  aim  of  this  siudy  was  lo  L-xamim:  deglutition  in 
stable  patients  with  COPI)  and  lung  hyperinllation.  DHSIUN;  Twenty  eon- 
secutlve.  eligible  COPD  patients  with  an  FEV|  <  65'/c  of  prcdieted  and  a 
total  lung  eapaeily  >  120%  of  predicted  were  enrolled  prospectively. 
INTERVENTION:  Patients  received  a  detailed  videofluoroscopic  evalua- 
tion of  oropharyngeal  swallowing  and  were  compared  to  20  age-matched 
and  sex-matched  historical  control  subjects.  SETTING:  An  outpatient  pul- 
monale clinic  at  a  Veterans  Affairs  Medical  Center.  MEA.SUREMENTS 
AND  RH.SUI.TS:  The  mean  total  king  capacity,  functional  residual  capac- 
ity, and  residual  volume  for  the  patients  were  128'/?^  of  predicted,  1689!^  of 
predicted,  and  2 1 8'/r  of  predicted,  respectively.  The  mean  FEV  i  was  39'^  of 
predicted.  There  was  no  evidence  of  tracheal  aspiration  in  either  group.  The 
laryngeal  position  at  rest  measured  relative  to  the  cervical  vertebrae  was  not 
different  between  groups.  The  maximal  laryngeal  elevation  during  swallow- 
ing was  significantly  lower  in  patients  with  COPD  (p  <  O.OOI ).  Patients  with 
COPD  exhibited  more  frequent  use  ot  spontaneous  protective  swallowing 
maneuvers  such  as  longer  duration  of  airway  closure  and  earlier  laryngeal 
closure  relative  to  the  cricopharyngeal  opening  than  did  control  subjects  (p  < 
O.D.'S).  CONCLUSIONS:  We  conclude  that  hypermllatcd  patients  with 
COPD  have  an  altered  swallowing  physiology.  We  suspect  that  the  protec- 
tive alterations  in  swallowing  physiology  (swallow  maneuvers)  may  reduce 
the  risk  of  aspiration.  However,  these  swallowing  maneuvers  may  not  be 
useful  during  an  exacerbation  and  may  require  further  research. 

Body  Mass  Index  and  the  Risk  of  COPD— Hank  Khan  Rl,  Fleg  JL, 
Wise  RA.  Chest  2002  Feb:121(2):37()-376. 

BACKGROflND:  Previous  studies  have  documented  the  prognostic  value 
of  low  body  weight  in  patients  w  ith  COPD  and  also  in  general  populations. 
However,  it  is  not  clear  whether  low  body  weight  is  a  risk  factor  for  COPD 
or  a  consequence  of  established  disease.  STUDY  OBJECTIVE;  To  deter- 
mine whether  asymptomatic  subjects  with  low  initial  body  mass  were  at  a 
greater  risk  of  having  COPD  develop  during  subsequent  follow-up. 
DESIGN  AND  SUBJECTS:  Observational  retrospective  study  of  4.'S8  male 
and  192  female  participants  (age  range,  40  to  7.3  years)  in  the  Baltimore 
Longitudinal  Study  of  Aging.  .At  baseline,  the  participants  did  not  have 
COPD.  After  tnean  follow-up  periods  of  10.2  years  for  the  men  and  6.4 
years  for  the  women,  40  men  and  7  women  received  a  diagnosis  of  COPD. 
METHODS:  Cox  proportional-hazards  regression  models  were  used  to 
assess  the  relationship  between  COPD  diagnosis  and  baseline  body  mass 
index  (BMI)  in  men.  RESULTS:  The  risk  of  COPD  developing  in  men  var- 
ied inversely  with  baseline  BMI,  even  after  adjusting  for  other  risk  factors, 
including  cigarette  smoking,  age,  FEV|  percent  predicted,  abdominal  obe- 
.sity,  and  educational  status.  In  men,  the  relative  risk  of  COPD  developing 
for  the  lowest  BMI  tcrtile  relative  to  the  highest  tcrtile  was  2.7fi  {95'i  con- 
fidence interval,  \.\5  to  b.59).  The  small  number  of  women  who  had 
COPD  did  not  allow  us  to  draw  conclusions  regarding  BMI  as  a  risk  factor 
for  COPD.  CONCLUSION:  After  controlling  for  confounding  variables, 
men  with  low  BMI  are  at  increased  risk  for  getting  COPD. 

Disconlinuullon  of  Fiiroseniidv  Decreases  Paio  in  Patients  with 
COP!)  -Bnikci  f.  Hei|dia  Yf,  \an  den  l-Jshout  FJ,  l-olgenng  HT.  Chest 
2002  Feb;121(2):.^77-3S2. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVE:  To  evaluate  whether  the  discontinuation  of 
furosemide  treatment  resulted  in  a  decrease  in  P.ico..  and  an  increase  in  day- 
hnie  and  nociurn:il  owgenation.  BACKGROUND:  Furosemide  is  widelv 


prescribed  in  patients  with  COPD  for  the  treatment  ol  peripheral  edema.  It  is 
known  that  furosemide  cau.ses  a  metabolic  alkalosis.  A  diminished  chemore- 
ceptor  stimulation  may  cause  a  decreased  alveolar  ventilation.  DESIGN: 
Randomized,  double-blind,  placebo-controlled,  crossover  trial.  SETTING: 
Department  of  Pulmonology,  Rijnstate  Hospital  Arnhem.  the  Netherlands. 
PATIENTS:  Twenty  patients  with  stable  COPD  (10  men;  median  age,  70 
years  (range,  ."iS  to  81  years];  FEV|  3,'S'/f  predicted  jrange,  19  to  70';i  pre- 
dicted! 1.  Subjects  were  included  if  they  had  received  lurosemide,  40  nig/d, 
for  the  treatment  ot  peripheral  edema  for  at  least  a  month  and  if  they  had  a 
mean  nocturnal  anerial  oxygen  saturation  (Sjo?)  <  92'/r.  Patients  with  ciir- 
diac  left  and/or  right  ventricular  dysfunction,  sleep  apneas,  and  patients 
receiving  other  diuretics,  angiotensin-converting  en/.yme  inhibitors,  potas- 
sium or  chloride  replacement  therapy,  or  long-term  oxygen  treatment  were 
excluded.  INTERVENTION:  Furosemide  was  discontinued  for  1  week  and 
replaced  by  placebo  treatment  in  the  first  or  the  second  week.  MEASL'RE- 
MENTS  AND  RESULTS:  Ventilation,  daytime  arterial  blood  gas  levels, 
and  nocturnal  Sjo.  were  measured  at  baseline,  alter  I.  and  after  2  weeks. 
Sixteen  subjects  completed  the  study.  Ventilation  increased  from  10.4  IVmin 
(range.  6.7  to  1.^.4  L/niin)  at  baseline  to  11.6  L/min  (range.  8.7  to  14.0 
L/min)  after  discontinuation  of  furosemide  (p<O.O.S).  Pjco;  decreased  from 
45  mm  Hg  (range,  35  to  64  mm  Hg)  to  41  mm  Hg  (range,  32  to  61  mm  Hg: 
p  <  0.01 ).  Daytime  and  nocturnal  oxygenation  did  not  improve.  CONCLU- 
SIONS: Although  it  does  not  improve  oxygenation,  the  discontinuation  of 
furosemide  decreases  PjCO;  in  patients  with  COPD. 

KfTects  of  Acetazolamide  and  Furosemide  on  Ventilation  and  Cere- 
bral Blood  Volume  in  Normocapnic  and  Hypercapnic  Patients  with 
COPD— van  de  Ven  MJ.  Colier  WN,  van  der  Sluijs  MC.  Oeseburg  B. 
Vis  P.  Folgering  H.  Chest  2002  Feb:121(2):383-.392. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVES:  Effects  of  chronic  metabolic  alkalosis  and  acido- 
sis and  their  relation  to  central  chemoregulation  may  differ  between  nor- 
mocapnic and  chronic  hypercapnic  patients  \vith  COPD.  The  relationship 
between  responses  of  inspired  ventilation  ( V|).  mouth  occlusion  pressure 
(Po.i).  and  cerebral  blood  volume  (CBV).  to  short-term  changes  in  anerial 
Pco:  was  measured.  PATIENTS  AND  METHODS:  Seventeen  patients 
with  chronic  hypercapnia  and  COPD  ( Pjco;  >  6.0  kPa)  and  16  normocap- 
nic patients  with  COPD  (P;,co:  ^  60  kPa)  |FEVi  27%  predicted]  were 
studied  under  baseline  metabolic  conditions  and  after  1  week  of  treatment 
with  oral  furosemide.  40  mg/d.  or  acetazolamide.  500  mg/d.  Hypercapnia 
(change  in  end-tidal  carbon  dioxide  >  1  kPa)  was  induced  by  administer- 
ing adequate  amounts  of  carbon  dioxide  in  the  inspired  air.  CBV  was 
measured  using  near-infrared  spectroscopy.  RESULTS:  Compared  with 
baseline  metabolic  condition,  chronic  metabolic  acidosis  and  alkalosis 
did  not  change  ventilatory  (AV|/AP.|CO:)  and  cerebrovascular 
(ACBV/APaco;)  reactivity.  Base  excess  (BE)  decreased  by  6.8  ±  I.I 
mEq/L  and  6.9  ±  1.6  niEq/L.  respectively,  in  the  normocapnic  and 
chronic  hypercapnic  COPD  groups  during  metabolic  acidosis,  resulting 
in  a  not-quite-significant  leftward  shift  of  both  the  ventilatory  and  cere- 
brovascular carbon  dioxide  response  curve.  BE  increased  by  2.3  ±  1.2 
mEq/L  and  1.2+  1.3  mEq/L.  respectively,  during  chronic  metabolic  alka- 
losis in  both  COPD  groups,  without  concomitant  shift.  Poor  correlations 
between  ventilatory  and  cerebrovascular  carbon  dioxide  responsiveness 
(ACBV/AR,a>;  and  AV,/AP.,ro:.  ACBV/AP,co;  and  AP„  |/AP.,a)...  respec- 
tively) were  found  irrespective  of  baseline,  respiratory  condition,  and 
induced  metabolic  state.  CONCLUSIONS:  Normocapnic  and  chronic 
hypercapnic  COPD  patients  have  the  same  ventilatory  and  cerebrovascu- 
lar carbon  dioxide  responsiveness  irrespective  of  induced  metabolic  state. 

Impact  of  Body  Weight  on  Long-Term  .Sur>i>al  After  Lung  Trans- 
plantation— Kanasky  WF  Jr.  Anton  SD.  Rodrigiie  JR.  Pern  MG.  Szwed 
T.  Ba/  MA.  Chest  2002  Feb;121(2):4()l-406. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVES:  The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  detenmne  the 
impact  ol  a  pietranspl.ml.ilion  determination  of  body  mass  index  iBMll 


750 


Respiratory  Care  .  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


on  survival  atier  lung  iransplantatlnn.  DESIGN  AND  PATIENTS:  Uni- 
variate and  multivariate  sur\ival  analyses  of  a  single  insiitutiim  database 
consisting  of  X5  patients  who  had  undergone  lung  transplanlalions 
between  March  I W4  and  October  1948.  SETTING;  University  ol  Florida 
Health  Science  Center.  RESULTS:  Kaplan-Meier  survival  curves 
showed  that  patients  who  were  obese  (ie.  BMl.  >  30)  at  a  pretransplania- 
tion  assessment  had  a  marked  decrease  in  posttransplantation  survival 
time  (log  rank,  p  <  0.05;  Wilcoxon,  p  <  0.05).  The  final  Cox  regression 
model  revealed  that  the  most  powerful  predictors  of  monality  after  lung 
transplantation  were  higher  pretransplantation  BMl  and  the  development 
of  obliterative  bronchiolitis.  CONCLUSIONS:  Our  results  suggest  that 
the  posttransplantation  risk  for  mortality  is  possibly  three  times  greater 
for  obese  patients  than  for  nonobese  patients.  Additional  study  is  needed 
to  identify  the  mechanisms  for  such  higher  risk  in  obese  patients.  Our 
data  also  suggest  that  transplantation  centers  should  not  routinely  reject 
underweight  patients  (ie.  BML  <  18.5)  or  overweight  patients  (ie.  BML 
25  to  29.9)  for  lung  transplantation  listing  solely  on  the  basis  of  weight, 
as  their  outcomes  may  not  be  significantly  different  than  patients  with 
normal  BMIs. 

Determinants  of  Chronic  Hypercapnia  in  Japanese  Men  with 
Obstructive  Sleep  Apnea  Syndrome — Akashiba  T.  Kawahara  S. 
Kosaka  N.  Ito  D.  Saito  O.  Majima  T.  Horie  T.  Chest  2002 

Feb:i:i(2):4l5-42l. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVE:  To  identify  the  determinants  of  chronic  hypercap- 
nia (ie.  Paco:.  S  45  mm  Hg)  in  men  with  obstructive  sleep  apnea  syn- 
drome (OSAS)  without  airflow  ob.struction.  DESIGN:  An  analysis  was 
conducted  of  143  male  patients  with  OSAS,  which  had  been  diagnosed  by 
polysomnography  (PSGi.  who  had  been  referred  to  a  university  hospital. 
Patients  were  classified  as  hypercapnic  (ie.  Paco:.  -  '♦S  mm  Hgl  and  nor- 
mocapnic  (ie.  Pjco;.  <  45  mm  Hgl.  and  obese  (ie.  body  mass  index 
|BMI],  >  30  kg/m-)  or  nonobese  (ie.  BML  <  30  kg/m-).  Patients  with  air- 
flow obstruction  (ie.  FEVi/FVC  ratio.  <  70%)  were  excluded  from  the 
study.  Baseline  clinical  characteristics,  pulmonary  function.  PSG  data, 
and  blood  gas  data  were  compared  between  hypercapnic  and  normocap- 
nic  patients.  Correlations  between  PaCO;  and  several  anthropometric,  res- 
piratory, and  polysomnographic  variables  were  determined  by  stepwise 
multiple  regression  analysis.  RESULTS:  Fifty-five  patients  (38%)  were 
hypercapnic.  Hypercapnic  patients  were  younger  and  heavier,  and  had 
more  abnormalities  on  pulmonary  and  PSG  testing.  Stepwise  multiple 
regression  analysis  revealed  that  the  Paco:  ie\e\  was  influenced  signifi- 
cantly by  the  mean  level  of  arterial  oxygen  saturation  (SaO;)  during  sleep 
and  by  the  percent  of  vital  capacity  (%  VC)  (R-  =  0.430;  p  <  0.0001 ).  indi- 
cating that  43%  of  the  total  variance  in  the  PaCO;  could  be  explained  by 
the  mean  SaO;  and  %VC  in  hypercapnic  patients.  In  contrast,  only  13%  of 
the  total  vanance  in  the  Paco;  was  accounted  for  by  the  mean  SaO;  and 
BMl  in  normocapnic  patients  (R-  =  0.134;  p  =  0.0034).  The  mean  SaO;. 
%VC.  and  PaO:  were  selected  as  independent  variables  for  predicting  the 
PaCO'  '"  obese  patients.  These  variables  explained  41%  of  the  total  vari- 
ance in  the  Paco;  (R"  =  0.407;  p  <  0.0001 ).  whereas  the  mean  SaO;  only 
accounted  for  13%  of  the  total  variance  in  Paco:  levels  in  nonobese 
patients  (R=  =  0.134;  p  =  0.00641.  CONCLUSION:  Nocturnal  desatura- 
tion  and  restrictive  pulmonary  impairment  play  major  roles  in  determin- 
ing the  PaCO;  in  hypercapnic  and  obese  OSAS  patients  without  airflow 
obstruction. 

Severe  Obstructive  Sleep  Apnea  Is  Associated  with  Left  Ventricular 
Diastolic  Dysfunction — Fung  JW.  Li  TS.  Choy  DK.  Yip  GW.  Ko  FW. 
Sanderson  JE.  Hui  DS.  Chest  2002  Feb;I21(2):422-429. 

INTRODUCTION:  Hypertension  is  common  in  patients  with  obstructive 
sleep  apnea  (OSA).  However,  the  effect  of  OSA  on  ventricular  function, 
especially  diastolic  function,  is  not  clear.  Therefore,  we  have  assessed  the 
prevalence  of  diastolic  dysfunction  in  patients  with  OSA  and  the  relation- 


Respiratory  Care  .  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


'h 


1 


y. 


When  a  patient  can't  generate  a  peak 
cough  flow  of  at  least  2.7  liters  per 
second,  they  will  not  be  able  to  manage 
secretions  during  upper  respiratory  tract  infections.  This 
can  lead  to  serious  respiratory  complications. 

The  CoughAsslsf'  is  the  only  airway  clearance  device  that 
can  generate  peak  expiratory  cough  flows  greater  than  6 
liters  per  second. 


To  learn  more  about  this  noninvasive  airway  clearance 
device  please  contact  us  at  1-800-252-1414. 


www.coughassist.com   j 

J.H.  Emerson  Co.   22  Cottage  Park  Ave  .  Cambridge.  MA,  USA  02140  j 

Circle  1 20  on  product  information  cord 


Pulmonetic  Systems,  Inc.,  is  a  rapidly  growing  developer  and 
manufacturer  of  critical  care  ventilators  for  the  homecare  and 
hospital  marketplace  worldwide.  Believing  that  each 
employee  directly  contributes  to  our  growth  and  success,  we 
have  an  excellent  opportunity  for  a  : 

Clinical  Specialist 

East  Coast 

As  a  key  member  of  our  Sales  &  Marketing  department,  the 
Clinical  Specialist  will  build  support  for  our  products  by  devel- 
oping relationships  with  influential  members  of  the  Respira- 
tory Care  community.  In  this  role  you  will  also  oversee  the 
clinical  evaluation  of  our  products,  serve  as  an  informational 
resource  for  clinicians  and  provide  support  for  field  sales  rep- 
resentatives. 

Requires  a  BA/BS  with  5-10  years  of  RRT  experience.  Ideal 
candidate  will  also  have  3-I-  years  Respiratory  Care  Manage- 
ment experience. 

PS!  offers  a  competitive  salary,  incentive  bonus,  advancement 
opportunities  and  comprehensive  benefits. 

Please  send  your  resume  and  salary  history  to:  HR  Depart- 
ment, Pulmonetic  Systems,  Inc.,  17400  Medina  Road,  Ply- 
mouth, Minnesota  55447.  Email:  hr@pulmonetic.com. 

PulmoneticSvstems 

Inquiries  in  all  areas  are  welcome. 
www.pulmoneticsystems.com. 

Equal  Opportunity  Employer. 


Circle  121  on  product  information  card 


7.SI 


Abstracts 


ship  between  diastolic  parameters  and  severity  of  OSA.  MBTHODS: 
Sixty-eight  consecutive  patients  with  OSA  confirmed  by  polysomnogra- 
phy underwent  echocardiography.  Diastolic  function  of  the  left  ventricle 
was  determined  by  trunsmitral  valve  pulse-wave  Doppler  echocardiogra- 
phy. Various  ba.seline  characteristics,  severity  of  OSA,  and  echocardio- 
graphic  parameters  were  compared  between  patients  with  and  without 
diastolic  dysfunction.  RESULTS:  There  were  61  male  and  7  female 
patients  with  a  mean  age  of  48. 1  ±  II .  I  years,  body  mass  inde.\  of  28.5  ± 
4.3  kg/m-,  and  apnea/hypopnea  index  (AHI)  of  44.3  ±  23.2/h  (mean  ± 
SD).  An  abnormal  relaxation  pattern  (ARP)  in  diastole  was  noted  in  25 
patient.s  (36.8%).  Older  age  (52.7  ±  8.y  years  vs  45.1  ±  1 1.3  years,  p  = 
0.0051,  hypertension  (56%  vs  20%,  p  =  0,002).  and  a  lower  minimum 
pulse  oximetric  saturation  (SpoO  during  sleep  (70.5  ±'  17.9%  vs  78.8  ± 
12.9%,  respectively;  p  =  0.049)  were  more  common  in  patients  with 
ARP.  By  multivariate  analysis,  minimum  Spo:  <  70%  was  an  independent 
predictor  of  ARP  (odds  ratio,  4.M:  95%  confidence  interval,  1.23  to 
15.25;  p  =  0.02)  irrespective  of  age  and  hypertension.  Patients  with  AHI  > 
40/h  had  significantly  longer  isovolumic  relaxation  times  than  those  with 
AHI  <  40/h  (106  +  19  ms  vs  93  ±  17  ms,  respectively;  p  =  0.005).  CON- 
CLUSION: Diastolic  dysfunction  with  ARP  was  common  in  patients 
with  OSA.  More  severe  sleep  apnea  was  associated  with  a  higher  degree 
of  left  ventricular  diastolic  dysfunction  in  this  study. 

Long-Term  Compliance  Rates  to  Continuous  Positive  .Airwa)  I'res- 
surc  in  Obstructive  Sleep  Apnea:  A  Population-Based  Study — Sin 

DD,  Mayers  I.  Man  GC,  Pawluk  L.  Chest  20(12  Feh:12  l(2):4.^(l-435. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVES:  To  determine  long-term  compliance  rates  to 
continuous  positive  airway  pressure  (CPAP)  therapy  in  patients  with 
obstructive  sleep  apnea  enrolled  in  a  comprehensive  CPAP  program  in 
the  community.  DESIGN:  Prospective  cohort  longitudinal  study.  SET- 
TING: University  sleep  disorders  center.  PATIENTS:  Two  hundred 
ninety-six  patients  with  an  apnea-hypopnea  index  (AHI)  >  2()/h  on 
polysomnography.  INTERVENTIONS:  A  CPAP  device  equipped  with  a 
monitoring  chip  was  supplied.  Within  the  first  week,  daily  telephone  con- 
tacts were  made.  Patients  were  seen  at  2  weeks,  4  weeks,  3  months,  and  6 
months.  RESULTS:  Of  the  296  subjects  enrolled,  81.1%  were  males. 
Mean  ±  SD  AHI  was  64.4  ±  34.2/h  of  sleep;  age,  51  ±  1 1.7  years;  and 
body  mass  index.  35.2  ±  7.9  kg/m-.  The  mean  duration  of  CPAP  use  was 
5.7  h/d  at  2  weeks.  5.7  h/d  at  4  weeks.  5.9  h/d  at  3  months,  and  5.8  h/d  at 
6  months.  The  percentage  of  patients  using  CPAP  >  3.5  h/d  was  89.0%  at 
2  weeks.  86.6%  at  4  weeks,  88.6%  at  3  months,  and  88.5%  at  6  months. 
There  was  a  decrease  in  the  Epworth  Sleepiness  Scale  (ESS)  score  of 
44%  by  2  weeks  of  therapy.  The  patients  continue  to  improve  over  the 
follow-up  period,  with  the  lowest  mean  ESS  score  observed  at  6  months. 
With  multiple  regression  analysis,  three  variables  were  found  to  be  sig- 
nificantly correlated  with  increased  CPAP  use:  female  gender,  increasing 
age,  and  reduction  in  ESS  score.  CONCLUSION:  A  population-based 
CPAP  program  consisting  of  consistent  follow-up,  "troubleshooting." 
and  regular  feedback  to  both  patients  and  physicians  can  achieve  CPAP 
compliance  rates  of  >  85%  over  6  months. 

Spironu'try  in  the  Supine  Position  lmpr()>es  the  Detection  of 
Diaphragmatic  Weakness  in  Patients  with  Amyotrophic  Lateral 

Sclero.sis— Lechtzin  N,  Wiener  CM,  Shade  DM.  Clawson  L,  Diette  GB. 
Chest  2002  Feb;121(2):436-442. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVES:  To  detcrniine  which  lespiitilory  function  tests 
best  predicted  diaphragmatic  strength  in  patients  w  ith  amyotrophic  lateral 
sclerosis,  PATIENTS  AND  METHODS:  Patients  referred  for  pulmonary 
evaluation  were  included  (n  =  25)  if  they  underwent  nieasurenienl  of 
transdiaphragmatic  pressure  (Pdi)  and  one  or  more  of  the  following  on 
the  same  day:  upright  FVC.  supine  FVC.  upright  FEV|,  supine  FEV|. 
maximal  inspiratory  pressure  (MIPl,  maximal  expiratory  pressure 


(MEP),  and  Pacoi-  Abdominal  paradox  and  use  of  accessory  muscles 
were  also  assessed.  Bivariale  analyses  were  performed  using  simple  lin- 
ear regression.  Sensitivity  and  specificity  of  the  potential  predictors  to 
detect  an  abnormal  Pdi  (<  70  cm  H:0)  were  calculated.  SETTINCi:  Pul- 
monary function  laboratory  of  an  academic  medical  center.  RESULTS: 
Upright  FVC.  FEV],  and  MEP  were  all  significantly  correlated  with  Pdi, 
while  MIP  and  P.,o>.'  were  not.  Supine  FVC  was  the  most  highly  corre- 
lated predictor  of  Pdi  (R-  =  0.76).  A  cutoff  of  supine  FVC  that  was  <  75% 
predicted  was  100%  sensitive  and  specific  for  predicting  an  abnormally 
low  Pdi.  Accessory  muscle  use  and  abdominal  paradox  were  both  signifi- 
cantly associated  with  Pdi.  and  the  presence  of  accessory  muscle  use  had 
a  sensitivity  of  84%  and  a  specificity  of  100%  for  detecting  a  low  Pdi. 
CONCLUSIONS:  Our  findings  suggest  that  supine  FVC  is  an  excellent 
:md  simple  test  of  duiphragniatic  weakness. 

Domiciliary-Assisted  Ventilation  in  Patients  with  Myotonic  Dystro- 
phy—Nugent AM.  Smith  IE.  Shneerson  JM.  Chest  2002  Feb;121(2K459- 
464. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVES:  Respiratory  failure  is  louiid  in  many  neuromus- 
cular diseases,  even  when  the  lungs  may  be  healthy,  because  of  an  inade- 
quacy of  the  ventilatory  pump.  Long-term  domiciliary  ventilation  is  a 
well-established  treatment  in  conditions  such  as  postpoliomyelitis;  how- 
ever, its  use  in  patients  with  respiratory  failure  secondary  to  myotonic 
dystrophy  has  not  been  well  described.  The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to 
review  the  use  of  domiciliary-assisted  ventilation  in  these  patients  and  to 
assess  their  response  to  treatment.  DESIGN:  Descriptive  analysis  of  ret- 
rospective and  prospective  clinical  data.  SETTING:  Inpatient,  noninva- 
sive respiratory-care  unit  in  a  tertiary  referral  center.  PATIENTS:  Sixteen 
patients  with  myotonic  dystrophy,  13  of  whom  required  ventilatory  sup- 
port. INTERVENTIONS  AND  MEASUREMENTS:  A  retrospective 
study  of  all  patients  with  myotonic  dystrophy  referred  for  assessment  for 
assisted  ventilation  was  pcrlormed.  including  results  of  arterial  blood  gas 
analysis,  pulmonary  function  tests,  and  overnight  oxygen  saturation  and 
transcutaneous  carbon  dioxide  levels.  A  prospective  reassessment  of  all 
patients  established  on  domiciliary  ventilation  was  performed,  including 
measurements  of  quality  of  life,  RESULTS:  Results  of  arterial  blood  gas 
analysis  showed  a  fall  in  mean  Paco;  from  64.3  to  53,8  mm  Hg  (p  <  0.05) 
on  discharge  after  starting  ventilation  and  a  rise  in  mean  P^o;  from  53.0  to 
65.3  mm  Hg  (p  <  0.05).  There  were  three  deaths,  at  5  months,  32  months, 
and  57  months,  respectively.  The  survivors  received  assisted  ventilation 
for  a  mean  period  of  27  months  (range.  2  to  76  months).  At  reassessment, 
improvements  in  arterial  blood  gas  levels  were  maintained,  with  mean 
P,iCO;  of  52.4  mm  Hg  and  PaO:  of  59.0  mm  Hg.  Mean  overnight  mean 
arterial  oxygen  saturation  rose  from  80.5  to  90.3%  after  the  start  of  treat- 
ment (p  <  0.001)  and  was  maintained  at  90.4%  at  reassessment.  Mean 
transcutaneous  Pco;  during  sleep  fell  from  59.3  to  41.4  mm  Hg  (p  < 
0.05).  and  to  43.7  mm  Hg  at  reassessment.  There  were  no  significant 
changes  in  spirometry  or  maximum  mouth  pressures.  Compliance  with 
treatment  for  our  test  group  was  lower  than  compliance  in  a  group  of  age- 
and  sex-matched  postpoliomyelitis  patients.  CONCLUSION:  Use  of 
domiciliary-assisted  ventilation  in  patients  with  myotonic  dystrophy  is 
:issocialed  with  prolonged  survival  and  a  sustained  improvement  in  arte- 
rial blood  gas  tensions. 

Effect  of  Continuous  Positive  .Airway  Pressure  on  the  Rapid  Shallow 
Breathing  Index  in  Patients  Following  Cardiac  Surgery — El-Khatib 
MF.   Jamalcddine   G\V.    Khoury    AR.   Obcid    MY.   Chest   2002 

Fcb;121(2):475-479. 

OBJECTIVES:  To  compare  the  rapid  shallow  breathing  index  (RSBl) 
under  different  ventilatory  support  settings  prior  to  extubation  trials. 
DESIGN:  Prospective  study.  SETTING:  Cardiac  surgery  unit  at  a  univer- 
sity hospital.  PATIENTS:  A  total  of  33  coronary  artery  bypass  grafting 


752 


RESP1RAT0R>-  Carh  .  J  LILY  2002  VOL  47  No  7 


Abstracts 


patients  reads  tor  cMubation.  IN  TFRVF.NTIONS:  Ijirnllcd  palicnls 
received  a  continuous  positive  airway  pressure  (CPAPl  trial  of  5  cm  H^O 
and  fraction  of  inspired  oxygen  (F|0;)  of  40' j  (condition  I ).  a  CPAP  (rial 
of  ?  cm  H:0  and  Fio.  of  2\''i  (condition  2).  and  a  l-iiiln  spontaneously 
breathing  room  air  trial  without  ventilatory  support  (condition  3).  These 
trials  were  applied  in  random  order.  Measurements  and  main  resulis: 
Average  values  of  respiratory  frequency  and  tidal  volume  were  measured 
under  the  three  experimental  conditions  in  all  patients  immediately  prior 
to  extubation.  The  RSBIs  were  determined  for  each  patient  under  each 
condition;  the  average  RSBIs  under  conditions  I.  2.  and  3  were  comparcil 
for  signitlcance.  The  average  RSBIs  (±  SD)  were  significantly  smaller 
under  condition  I  l34±  1 3l  and  condition  2  (36  ±  14)  compared  to  condi- 
tion 3  (71  ±  24).  There  was  no  significant  difference  in  RSBI  between 
conditions  1  and  2.  CONCLUSIONS:  The  administration  of  5  cm  H:0  of 
CPAP  can  influence  the  determination  of  the  RSBI.  In  contrast,  changes 
in  Fio.,  have  no  effect  on  RSBI  determination.  We  speculate  that  using  the 
RSBI  during  CPAP  may  mislead  the  clinician  into  premature  discontinu- 
ation of  mechanical  ventilation.  Consequently,  different  threshold  values 
for  the  RSBI  should  be  derived  for  different  ventilatory  support  levels. 

Central  Venous  and  Bladder  Pressure  Reflect  Transdiaphragmatic 
Pressure  During  Pressure  Support  Ventilation — Chieveley-Williams 
S,  Dinner  L.  Puddicombe  A.  Field  D.  Lovell  AT.  Goldslone  JC.  Che.st 
2002Feb;l2l(2):-'i33-.S.W. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVES:  To  determine  whether  the  change  in  bladder 
pressure  (Pbiad)  and  central  venous  pressure  (P^p)  may  reflect  the 
changes  in  esophageal  pressure  (Pes)  and  gastric  pressure  (Pgas)  when 
Inspiratory  pressure  support  (IPS)  is  altered.  DESIGN:  Prospective  clini- 
cal study.  SETTING:  The  ICUs  of  a  teaching  hospital.  PATIENTS:  Ten 
patients  currently  receiving  IPS  ventilation  via  a  tracheostomy  or  an 
endotracheal  tube  who  already  had  bladder  and  central  venous  catheters 
in  situ.  MEASUREMENTS  AND  RESULTS:  Airway  pressure.  Pes.  P„as. 
Ptvp.  Pbiaii-  and  flow  were  measured  at  the  original  IPS  setting.  IPS  then 
was  reduced  by  5-cm  HiO  increments  until  IPS  was  zero  or  was  at  the 
minimum  pressure  that  could  be  tolerated  by  each  patient.  At  each  level 
of  IPS.  pressures  and  flow  were  measured  at  steady-state  breathing.  The 
ma.ximum  pressure  difference  for  each  pressure  during  inspiration  was 
calculated.  We  found  that  the  APhijj  correlated  closely  with  the  AP„js  (r  = 
0.904)  and  that  the  APes  correlated  with  the  AP,>p  (r  =  0.951 1.  When  the 
APtvp  -  APhiad  was  compared  with  the  transdiaphragmatic  pressure  for 
each  patient  as  the  IPS  was  altered,  the  correlation  coefficients  varied 
from  0.952  to  0.999.  CONCLUSION:  Although  absolute  values  for  the 
APevp  during  mechanical  ventilation  do  not  always  reflect  the  APes.  useful 
information  can  be  obtained  from  this  route.  In  individual  patients,  the 
two  sites  of  measurement  followed  each  other  when  IPS  was  changed, 
enabling  a  bedside  assessment  of  the  response  to  reducing  respiratory 
support. 

A  Cross-Cultural  Comparison  of  Critical  Care  Delivery:  Japan  and 
the  I'nited  States — Sirio  CA.  Tajimi  K.  Taenaka  N,  Ujike  Y.  Okamoto 
K.  Katsuya  H.  Chest  2002  Feb;121(2):539-548  . 

OBJECTIVE:  To  compare  the  utilization  and  outcomes  of  critical  care 
services  in  a  cohon  of  hospitals  in  the  United  Stales  and  Japan.  DESIGN: 
Prospective  data  collection  on  5.107  patients  and  detailed  organizational 
characteristics  from  each  of  the  participating  Japanese  study  hospitals 
between  1993  and  1995.  with  comparisons  made  to  prospectively  col- 
lected data  on  the  17.440  patients  included  in  the  US  APACHE  (acute 
physiology  and  chronic  health  evaluation)  III  database.  SETTING: 
Twenty-two  Japanese  and  40  US  hospitals.  PATIENTS:  Consecutive, 
unselected  patients  from  medical,  surgical,  and  mixed  medical/surgical 
ICUs.  MEASUREMENTS:  Severity  of  illness,  predicted  risk  of  in-hospi- 
tal  death,  and  ICU  and  hospital  length  of  stay  (LOS)  were  assessed  using 
APACHE   111.  Japanese  ICU  directors  completed  a  detailed  survey 


describing  their  units.  MAIN  RESULTS:  US  and  Japanese  ICUs  have  a 
similar  array  of  modalities  available  for  care.  Only  I.O'/t  (range.  0.5ft  to 
2.7'r )  of  beds  in  Japanese  hospitals  were  designated  as  ICUs.  The  organi- 
zation of  the  Japanese  and  US  ICUs  varied  by  hospital,  but  Japanese 
ICL's  were  more  likely  to  be  organized  to  care  for  heterogeneous  diagnos- 
tic populations.  Sample  case-mix  differences  reflect  diflerent  disease 
prevalence.  ICU  utilization  for  women  is  significantly  lower  (35.5%  vs 
44.8'/r  of  patients)  and  there  were  relatively  fewer  patients  >  85  years  old 
in  the  Japanese  ICU  cohort  ( 1.2"^  vs  4.6%).  despite  a  higher  per  capita 
rate  ol  individuals  >  85  years  old  in  Japan.  The  utilization  of  ICUs  for 
patients  at  low  risk  of  death  significantly  less  in  Japan  ( 10. 2'*  I  than  in  the 
Linited  States  (12.9%).  The  APACHE  III  score  stratified  patient  risk. 
Overall  mortality  was  similar  in  both  national  samples  after  accounting 
for  differences  in  hospital  LOS.  utilizing  a  model  that  was  highly  discrim- 
inating (receiver  operating  characteristic.  0.87)  when  applied  to  the 
Japanese  sample.  The  application  of  a  US-based  mortality  model  to  a 
Japanese  sample  overestimated  mortality  across  all  but  the  highest  (> 
90%  )  deciles  of  risk.  Significant  variation  in  expected  pert'ormance  was 
noted  between  hospitals.  Risk-adjusted  ICU  LOS  was  not  significantly 
longer  in  Japan:  however,  total  hospital  stay  was  nearly  twice  that  found 
in  the  US  hospitals,  rellecling  differences  in  hospital  utilization  philoso- 
phies. CONCLUSIONS:  Similar  high-technology  critical  care  is  avail- 
able in  both  countries.  Variations  in  ICU  utilization  reflect  differences  in 
case-mix  and  bed  availability.  Japanese  ICU  utilization  by  gender  reflects 
differences  in  disease  prevalence,  whereas  differences  in  utilization  by 
age  may  reflect  differences  in  cultural  norms  regarding  the  limits  of  care. 
Such  differences  provide  context  from  which  to  assess  the  delivery  of 
care  across  international  borders.  Miscalibration  of  predictive  models 
applied  to  international  data  samples  highlight  the  impact  that  differences 
in  resource  use  and  local  practice  cultures  have  on  outcomes.  Models  may 
require  modification  in  order  to  account  for  these  differences.  Neverthe- 
less, with  large  databases,  it  is  possible  to  assess  critical  care  delivery  sys- 
tems between  countries  accounting  for  differences  in  case-mix.  severity 
of  illness,  and  cultural  normative  standards  facilitating  the  design  and 
management  such  systems. 

2-Month  Mortality  and  Functional  Status  of  Critically  III  Adult 
Patients  Receiving  Prolonged  Mechanical  \  entilation — Quality  of 
Life  After  Mechanized  Ventilation  in  the  Elderly  Study  Investigators. 
Chest  2002  Feb:l2l(2):-549-558. 

STUDY  OBJECTIVES:  To  describe  the  2-month  mortality  and  func- 
tional status  of  adult  patients  receiving  prolonged  (at  least  48  h)  mechani- 
cal ventilation  (MV),  and  to  identify  patient  characteristics  that  are  asso- 
ciated with  2-month  mortality.  DESIGN:  Prospective  cohort  study. 
SETTING:  Four  ICUs  at  a  tertiary-care  institution.  PATIENTS:  Eight 
hundred  seventeen  patients  who  received  prolonged  MV.  INTERVEN- 
TIONS: None.  MEASUREMENTS  AND  RESULTS:  Median  age.  sex 
distribution,  and  median  Charlson  comorbidity  score  of  the  817  patients 
were  65  years,  45.8%  women,  and  I.  respectively.  The  median  scores  on 
Katz  Activities  of  Daily  Living,  Instrumental  Activities  of  Daily  Living 
Deficits,  and  Medical  Outcomes  Study  Short-Form  36  surveys  before 
hospitalization  were  0,  1,  and  50.  respectively.  Median  APACHE  (acute 
physiology  and  chronic  health  evaluation)  III  score  and  probability  of 
hospital  death  for  the  cohort  were  64  and  0.3 1 .  respectively.  Median  dura- 
tion of  M V  was  9  days.  Two-month  mortality  was  43%.  Independent  pre- 
dictors of  mortality  at  2  months  were  age.  comorbidities,  and  prehospital 
functional  status.  The  adjusted  odds  of  dying  within  2  months  increased 
34%  for  each  decade  increase  in  age.  Functional  status  deteriorated  at  2 
months  compared  to  functional  status  prior  to  hospitalization,  and  35%  of 
the  survivors  were  at  risk  for  clinical  depression.  Among  the  2-month  sur- 
vivors for  whom  the  need  for  a  caregiver  was  assessed,  78%  had  a  care- 
giver. CONCLUSIONS:  Older  age,  in  addition  to  functional  status  and 
comorbidities,  was  associated  with  increased  mortality  at  2  months. 
Functional  status  of  survivors  declined  at  2  months. 


RESPIRATORY  CARE  .  JULY  2002  VOL  47  NO  7 


753 


ABSTRACTS 


A  Systematic  Review  of  the  Effects  of  Bronchodilators  on  Exercise 
Capacitj  in  Patients  with  C'OPD-  l.icskcr  JJ,  Wi|ksira  PJ.  Ten  Hacken 
NH,  Koeter  GH.  PoMiiia  DS,  Kcrstjens  HA.  Chest  2002  Feb; 1 2 1(2 1:597- 
608. 

One  of  the  major  goals  of  hronchodilalor  therapy  in  patients  with 
COPD  is  to  decrease  airflow  limitation  in  the  airways  and.  as  a  conse- 
quence, improve  dyspnea  and  exercise  tolerance.  The  focus  of  this 
systematic  review  is  to  assess  the  effects  of  treatment  with  6-agonists, 
anticholinergics,  and  theophyllines  on  dyspnea,  and  steady-state  and 
incremental  exercise  capacity.  Thirty-three,  double-blind,  random- 
ized, placebo-controlled  studies  written  in  English  were  selected.  This 
review  shows  that  approximately  half  of  the  studies  showed  a  signifi- 
cant effect  of  bronchodilator  therapy  on  exercise  capacity.  Anticholin- 
ergic agents  have  significant  beneficial  effects  in  the  majority  of  stud- 
ies, especially  when  measured  by  steady-state  exercise  protocols. 
There  is  a  trend  toward  a  better  effect  of  high-dose  compared  to  low- 
dose  anticholinergics.  Short-acting  Bi-mimetics  have  favorable 
effects  on  exercise  capacity  in  more  than  two  thirds  of  the  studies; 
surprisingly,  the  situation  is  less  clear  for  long-acting  Bi-agents.  The 
majority  of  the  results  of  the  published  reports  on  theophyllines  and 
their  effects  on  exercise  are  negative.  Direct  comparisons  of  different 
classes  of  bronchodilators  have  not  been  made  in  a  sufficient  number 
of  studies  for  a  rational  preference.  The  addition  of  a  second  bron- 
chodilator has  no  proven  advantage  for  improving  exercise  test 
results,  but  this  has  not  been  studied  extensively  and  not  in  suffi- 
ciently large  studies.  The  majority  of  studies  reporting  a  measure  of 
dyspnea  found  improvements,  even  in  the  absence  of  improvement  in 
exercLse  capacity. 

COPD  and  Osteoporosis— Biskobing  DM.  Chest  2002  Feb;121(2):609- 
620. 

Osteoporosis,  with  resulting  fractures,  is  a  significant  problem  in  patients 
with  advanced  COPD.  The  etiology  for  the  bone  loss  is  diverse  but 
includes  smoking,  vitamin  D  deficiency,  low  body  mass  index,  hypogo- 
nadism, sedentary  lifestyle,  and  use  of  glucocorticoids.  Effective  strate- 
gies to  prevent  bone  loss  and/or  to  treat  osteoporosis  include  calcium  and 
vitamin  D.  hormone  replacement  when  indicated,  calcitonin,  and  bispho- 
sphonate  administration.  However,  many  patients  remain  undiagnosed 
until  their  first  fracture  because  of  the  lack  of  recognition  of  the  disease. 
With  an  increased  awareness  by  pulmonologists  and  the  increased  use  of 
preventive  strategies,  the  impact  of  osteoporosis  on  those  patients  with 
COPD  should  decrease. 

Pulmonary  Edema  Caused  by  Inhaled  Nitric  Oxide  Therapy  in  Two 
Patients  with  Pulmonary  Hypertension  Associated  with  the  CREST 
Syndrome — Preston  IR.  Klinger  JR.  Houtchens  J.  Nelson  D.  Mehta  S. 
Hill  NS.  Chest  2002  Feb;121(2):656-6.'i9. 

Pulmonary  arterial  hypertension  (PAH)  is  commonly  associated  with  the 
CREST  (calcinosis,  Raynaud  phenomenon,  esophageal  dysmotility.  scle- 
rodactyly,  telangiectasia)  syndrome.  Inhaled  nitric  oxide  (iNO)  is  often 
used  to  assess  acute  vasoresponsiveness  in  patients  with  PAH,  and 
reports  of  adverse  reactions  have  been  infrequent.  We  describe  two  of 
nine  patients  with  PAH  and  CREST  syndrome  who  had  pulmonary 
edema  develop  during  acute  iNO  testing.  This  complication  was  not 
encountered  in  the  46  patients  with  other  forms  of  PAH  tested  with  iNO. 
We  suggest  that  INO  should  be  used  with  caution,  if  at  all.  to  test  acute 
vasoreactivity  in  patients  with  CRF.ST  syndrome. 

DitTust  Panhnmchiolitis:  A  Treatable  Sinobrunchial  Disease  in  Need 
of  Recognition  in  the  finited  States — Krishnan  P.  Thachil  R.  Gillego  V. 

Chest  2(102Feb;i21(2):6.Sy-661. 


Diffuse  panbronchiolitis  (DPB)  is  a  progressive  inflammatory  disease, 
well  recogm/ed  in  Japan,  characterized  by  sinusitis  and  obstructive  small 
airway  disease;  if  left  untreated,  it  progresses  to  bronchiectasis,  respira- 
tory failure,  and  death.  Treatment  using  low-dose  erythromycin  has 
proven  to  be  highly  eft~icacious.  Lack  of  familiarity  with  DPB  in  the 
United  States  may  result  in  the  failure  to  correctly  diagnose  and  treat  this 
disorder.  We  describe  a  Cambodian  man  in  whom  the  characteristic 
imaging  and  histologic  features  of  DPB  were  elicited  but  not  recognized 
in  spite  of  evaluation  at  a  referral  center.  When  DPB  was  diagnosed  6 
years  later,  he  was  in  respiratory  failure,  but  made  an  excellent  recovery 
once  erythromycin  therapy  was  instituted.  We  report  this  case  to  increase 
physician  awareness  of  DPB  as  a  cause  of  sinobronchial  disease  and  dis- 
cuss its  diagnostic  features  so  that  the  disease  is  recognized  and  treated 
without  delay. 

Alteration  of  Contractile  Force  and  Mass  in  the  Senescent 
Diaphragm  with  li2-Agonist  Treatment — Smith  WN.  Dirks  A,  Sugiura 
T,  Muller  S,  Scarpace  P,  Powers  SK.  J  Appl  Physiol  2002  Mar.92(3):94l- 
94X. 

Aging  is  associated  with  a  decrease  in  diaphragmatic  maximal  tetanic 
force  production  (P,,)  in  senescent  rats.  Treatment  with  the  Bi-agonist 
clenbuterol  (CB)  has  been  shown  to  increase  skeletal  muscle  ma,ss  and  Po 
in  weak  locomotor  skeletal  muscles  from  dystrophic  rodents.  It  is 
unknown  whether  CB  can  increase  diaphragmatic  mass  and  Po  in  senes- 
cent rats.  Therefore,  we  tested  the  hypothesis  that  CB  treatment  will 
increase  specific  Pn  (i.e.,  force  per  cross-sectional  area)  and  mass  in  the 
diaphragm  of  old  rats.  Young  (5  mo)  and  old  (23  mo)  male  Fischer  3-M 
rats  were  randomly  assigned  to  one  of  the  following  groups  'n  = 
10/group):  1 )  young  CB  treated;  2)  young  control;  3)  old  CB  treated;  and 
4)  old  control.  Animals  were  injected  daily  with  either  CB  (2  mg/kg)  or 
saline  for  28  days.  CB  increa.sed  (p  <  0.05)  the  mass  of  the  costal 
diaphragm  in  both  young  and  old  animals.  CB  treatment  increased 
diaphragmatic-specific  P„  in  old  animals  (approximately  15%;  p  <  0.05) 
but  did  not  alter  (p  >  0.05)  diaphragmatic-specific  Po  in  young  animals. 
Biochemical  analysis  indicated  that  the  improved  maximal  specific  Po  in 
the  diaphragm  of  CB-treated  old  animals  was  not  due  to  increased 
myofibrillar  protein  concentration.  Analysis  of  the  myosin  heavy  chain 
(MHO  content  of  the  costal  diaphragm  revealed  a  CB-induced  Increase 
(p  <  0.05)  in  type  lib  MHC  and  a  decrease  in  type  I.  Ila.  and  llx  MHC  in 
both  young  and  old  animals.  These  data  support  the  hypothesis  that  CB 
treatment  can  restore  the  age-associated  decline  in  both  diaphragmatie- 
specitic  P,,  and  muscle  mass. 

Nitric  Oxide  Mediates  Hypoxla-Induced  Cerebral  Vasodilation  in 
Humans— Van  Mil  AH.  Spilt  A.  Van  Buchem  MA.  Bollen  EL, 
Teppema  L.  Westendorp  RG,  Blauw  GJ.  J  Appl  Physiol  2002 
Mar;92(3):962-966. 

Nitric  oxide  (NO)  plays  a  pivotal  role  in  the  regulation  of  peripheral  vas- 
cular tone.  Its  role  in  the  regulation  of  cerebral  vascular  tone  in  humans 
remains  to  be  elucidated.  This  study  investigates  the  role  of  NO  in 
hypoxia-induced  cerebral  vasodilatation  in  young  healthy  volunteers.  The 
effect  of  the  NO  syntha.se  inhibitor  N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine  (L- 
NMMA)  on  the  cerebral  blood  flow  (CBF)  was  assessed  during  normoxia 
and  during  hypoxia  (peripheral  O:  saturation  97  and  809r.  respectively). 
Subjects  were  positioned  in  a  magnetic  resonance  scanner,  breathing  nor- 
mal air  (normoxia)  or  a  N^-  O:  mixture  (hypoxia).  The  CBF  was  mea- 
sured before  and  after  administration  of  L-NMM.^  (3  mg/kg)  by  use  of 
phase-contrast  magnetic  resonance  imaging  techniques.  Administration 
of  L-NMMA  during  normoxia  did  not  affect  CBF.  Hypoxia  increased 
CBF  from  l.(U9  ±  113  to  1.209  ±  143  mL/min  (p  <  0.05).  After  L- 
NMMA  administration,  the  augmented  CBF  returned  to  baseline  ( 1 .050  ± 
161  mL/min;  p  <  0.05).  Similarly,  cerebral  vascular  resistance  declined 
during  hypoxia  and  returned  to  baseline  alter  administration  of  L-NMMA 


754 


Rh.spir.atory  Care  .  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


NEED  CE  CREDITS  NOW? 
Click  Here,  You're  There! 


.iH^^^^s 


MANAGERS:  Do  You  Need  Staff  CE  to  Meet 

JCAHO  and  Regulatory  Requirements? 

If  so,  group  discounts  are  available. 

Call  the  AARC  at  972-243-2272. 


For  more  information  or  a 
FREE  DEMO,  visit  www.aarc.org. 


You  can  always  pick  up  Continuing 
Education  credits  by  logging  into 
CRCE  Online  at  the  AARC  web  site. 
That's  right,  anywhere,  anytime, 
access  quality  continuing  education 
at  www.aarc.org. 

Courses  Available: 

New  Developments  in  Respiratory  Drugs, 
Medications  and  Delivery  Devices  (i  ce  oedtt  Hour) 

Speakers:  Joseph  L  Rau  PhD,  RRT,  FAARC 
Richard  D.  Branson,  RRT,  FAARC 

Introduction  to  Mechanical  Ventilation 
Waveform  Interpretation  (4  ce  credn  Hours) 

Author:  David  N.  Yonutas,  MS,  RRT 

Pediatric  Asthma  in  the  ER  (i  ce  credit  Hour) 

Speakers:  Timothy  R.  Myers,  RRT 
Thomas  J.  Kallstrom,  RRT  FAARC 

Spirometry  (l  ce  credit  Hour) 
Author:  Susan  Blonshine,  RRT  RPFT,  FAARC 


Did  you  know  that  AARC  members 

receive  the  highest  discounts 

and  have  their  credits  tracked 

for  them  through  CRCE? 


Enjoy  the  benefits  of  CRCE  Online: 

•  High  Quality,  Classroom-Type  Experience 

•  Work  At  Your  Own  Pace!  Flexibility  and 
Convenience  with  45  Days  to  Complete 

•  Instant  Certificate  of  Completion 

•  A  Simple  Registration  Process 

•  Knowledge  at  Your  Fingertips 

•  Technical  Support,  24/7 

•  Cost- Effective  Course  Options: 
Read-and-Learn  -  $20  per  credit  hour* 
Multimedia  -  $30  per  credit  hour* 

*AARC  Member  rates 


ABSTRACTS 


(p  <  0.05  for  both).  Use  of  phase-contraM  magnetic  resonance  imaging 
shows  that  hypoxia-induced  cerebral  vasodilatation  in  humans  is  medi- 
ated by  NO. 

Kioenerci'tie  Aduplallon  of  Individual  Human  Diuphra^imatic 
.NlMiUhers  In  Severe  COI'I) — l.cMiii.-  .S.  (irci;iM>  C.  Ngu\en  T.  Shrager 
J,  Kaiser  L.  Rubinstein  N.  Dudley  G.  J  Appi  Physiol  21)0: 
Mar;92(3):1205-I2l3. 

To  assess  the  effect  of  severe  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease 
(COPD)  on  the  ability  of  human  diaphragmatic  myofibers  to  aerobi- 
cally  generate  ATP  relative  to  ATP  utili/ation.  we  obtained  biopsy 
specimens  of  the  costal  diaphragm  from  seven  patients  with  severe 
COPD  (mean  +  SE;  age  56  ±  I  yr;  forced  expiratory  volume  in  I  s  23  ± 
2%  predicted;  residual  volume  267  ±  30'*  predicted)  and  seven  age- 
matched  control  subjects.  We  categori/ed  all  fibers  in  these  biopsies 
by  using  standard  techniques,  and  we  carried  out  the  following  quanti- 
tative histochemical  measurements  by  microdensitometry:  1)  succinate 
dehydrogenase  (SDH)  activity  as  an  indicator  of  mitochondrial  oxida- 
tive capacity  and  2)  calcium-acti\aicd  myosin  ATPase  (mATPase) 
activity,  the  ATPase  that  represents  a  major  portion  of  ATP  consump- 
tion by  contracting  muscle.  We  noted  the  following:  1  )  COPD 
diaphragms  had  a  larger  proportion  of  type  I  fibers,  a  lesser  proportion 
of  type  Ilax  fibers,  and  the  same  proportion  of  type  lla  fibers  as  con- 
trols. 2)  SDH  activities  of  each  of  the  fiber  types  were  higher  in  COPD 
than  control  diaphragms  (p  <  0.0001);  the  mean  increases  (expressed 
as  percent  of  control  values)  in  types  I.  Ila.  and  Ilax  were  84,  1 14,  and 
IBC;}-,  respectively.  3)  COPD  elicited  no  change  in  mATPase  activity 
of  type  I  and  Ila  fibers,  but  mATPase  decreased  in  type  Ilax  fibers  (p  = 
0.02).  4)  Mitochondrial  oxidative  capacity  relative  to  ATP  demand 
(i.e.,  SDH/mATPase)  was  higher  (p  =  0.03)  in  each  of  the  fiber  types  in 
COPD  diaphragms  than  in  controls.  These  results  demonstrate  that 
severe  COPD  elicits  an  increase  in  aerobic  ATP  generating  capacity 
relative  to  ATP  utilization  in  all  diaphragmatic  fiber  types  as  well  as 
the  previously  described  fast-to-slow  fiber  type  transformation  (Levine 
S.  Kaiser  L,  Leferovich  J.  and  Tikiinov  B.  N  Engl  J  Med  337:  1799- 
1806,  1997). 

Effect  of  Positive  Pressure  on  Venous  Return  in  Volume-Loaded 
Cardiac  Surgical  Patients — van  den  Berg  PC.  Jansen  JR.  Pinsky  MR.  J 
AppI  Physiol  2002  Mar:92(3):l223-I23l. 

The  hemodynamic  effects  of  increases  in  airway  pressure  (Pan)  are 
related  in  part  to  Pa»-induced  increases  in  right  atrial  pressure  (Pra).  the 
downstream  pressure  for  venous  return,  thus  decreasing  the  pressure 
gradient  for  venous  return.  However,  numerous  animal  and  clinical 
studies  have  shown  that  venous  return  is  often  sustained  during  ventila- 
tion with  positive  end-expiratory  pressure  (PEEP).  Potentially,  PEEP- 
induced  diaphragmatic  descent  increases  abdominal  pressure  (Pabj).  We 
hypothesized  that  an  increase  in  Pj„  induced  by  PEEP  would  minimally 
alter  venous  return  because  the  associated  increase  in  P„  would  be  par- 
tially offset  by  a  concomitant  increase  in  Pahj.  Thus  we  studied  the 
acute  effects  of  graded  increases  of  Paw  on  Pra,  Pabd-  and  cardiac  output 
by  application  of  inspiratory-hold  maneuvers  in  sedated  and  paralyzed 
humans.  Forty-two  patients  were  studied  in  the  intensive  care  unit  after 
coronary  artery  bypass  surgery  during  hemodynamically  stable,  tluid- 
resuscilated  conditions.  P,m  was  progressively  increased  in  steps  of  2  to 
4  cm  HiO  from  0  to  20  cm  HiO  in  sequential  2.'i-s  inspiratory-hold 
maneuvers.  Right  ventricular  (RV)  cardiac  ou(put  (COu)  and  RV  ejec- 
tion fraction  (EF,J  were  measured  at  5  s  into  the  inspiratory-hold 
maneuver  by  the  thermodilution  technique.  RV  end-diastolic  volume 
and  stroke  volume  were  calculated  from  EF,,  and  heart  rate  data,  and 
Pra  was  measured  from  the  pulmonary  artery  catheter.  Pabd  was  esti- 
mated as  bladder  pressure.  We  found  that,  although  increasing  Pj„  pro- 


gressively increased  Pra.  neither  CO^  nor  RV  end-diastolic  volume 
changed.  The  ratio  of  change  (A)  in  Pan  to  A  Pra  was  0.32  ±  0.20.  The 
ratio  of  A  P,a  to  A  CO,j  was  0.05  ±  00. 1 5  I  x  min  '  x  mm  Hg  ' .  However, 
Pahii  increased  such  that  the  ratio  of  A  P,a  to  A  Pabd  was  0.73  ±  0.36, 
meaning  that  most  of  the  increase  in  Prj  was  reflected  in  increases  in 
P,ihj  We  conclude  that,  in  hemodynamically  stable  tluid-resuscitated 
postoperative  surgical  patients,  inspiratory-hold  maneuvers  with 
increases  in  Pan  of  up  to  20  cm  HiO  have  ininimal  effects  on  cardiac 
output,  primarily  because  of  an  in-phase-associated  pressurization  of 
the  abdominal  compartment  associated  with  compression  of  the  liver 
and  squeezing  of  the  lungs. 

Asthma  in  Exercising  Children  Exposed  to  Ozone:  A  Cohort  Study — 

McConnell  R.  Berhane  K.  Gilliland  F,  London  SJ.  Islam  T.  Gaudemian 
WJ.  e(  al.  Lancet  2002  Feb  2:359(9304):386-.39l. 

BACKGROUND:  Little  is  known  about  the  elfect  of  exposure  to  air 
pollution  during  exercise  or  time  spent  outdoors  on  the  development 
of  asthma.  We  investigated  the  relation  between  newly-diagnosed 
asthma  and  team  sports  in  a  cohort  of  children  exposed  to  different 
concentrations  and  mixtures  of  air  pollutants.  METHODS:  3535  chil- 
dren with  no  history  of  asthma  were  recruited  from  schools  in  12  com- 
munities in  southern  California  and  were  followed  up  for  up  to  5 
years.  265  children  reported  a  new  diagnosis  of  asthma  during  follow- 
up.  We  assessed  risk  of  asthma  in  children  playing  team  sports  at 
study  entry  in  six  communities  with  high  daytime  ozone  concentra- 
tions, six  with  lower  concentrations,  and  in  communities  with  high  or 
low  concentrations  of  nitrogen  dioxide,  particulate  matter,  and  inor- 
ganic-acid vapour.  FINDINGS:  In  communities  with  high  ozone  con- 
centrations, the  relative  risk  of  developing  asthma  in  children  playing 
three  or  more  sports  was  3.3  (95%  CI  1.9-5.8).  compared  with  chil- 
dren playing  no  sports.  Sports  had  no  effect  in  areas  of  low  ozone  con- 
centration (0.8,  0.4-1.6).  Time  spent  outside  was  associated  with  a 
higher  incidence  of  asthma  in  areas  of  high  ozone  (1.4,  1.0-2.1),  but 
not  in  areas  of  low  ozone.  Exposure  to  pollutants  other  than  ozone  did 
not  alter  the  effect  of  team  sports.  INTERPRETATION:  Incidence  of 
new  diagnoses  of  asthma  is  associated  with  heavy  exercise  in  commu- 
nities with  high  concentrations  of  ozone,  thus,  air  pollution  and  out- 
door exercise  could  contribute  to  the  development  of  asthma  in  chil- 
dren. 

Factors  Determining  Cardiac  Nurses'  Intentions  to  Continue  Using  a 
Smoking  Cessation  Protocol — Bolman  C.  de  Vries  H.  Mesters  I.  Heart 

Lung  2002  Jan-Feb;31(  I ):  15-24. 

OBJECTIVE:  Our  objective  was  to  facilitate  the  continued  use  of  a 
smoking  cessation  protocol  among  cardiac  nurses  by  assessing  their 
intentions  and  motives  for  continuation.  A  model  that  coinbines  atti- 
tude, social  influence,  and  self-efficacy  constructs  as  predictors  of 
intentions  (ASE  model)  served  as  the  theoretical  framework.  SET- 
TING: The  study  took  place  in  the  cardiology  wards  of  5  hospitals. 
RESPONDENTS:  Respondents  were  85  nurses  who  worked  in  the  car- 
diology wards  of  the  hospitals.  OUTCOME  MEASURES:  The  out- 
come measures  were  nurses'  intentions  and  motives  for  continuing  to 
use  a  smoking  cessation  protocol  for  patients  who  smoke.  RESULTS: 
Greater  perceived  simplicity  and  advantages  of  the  protocol  were  as.so- 
ciated  with  increased  intentions  to  continue,  whereas  perceived  social 
inlluences  and  self-efficacy  were  not.  The  influence  of  the  level  of 
experience  in  using  the  protocol  and  the  nurses'  own  smoking  behavior 
was  mediated  by  attitude  about  the  smoking  cessation  protocol.  CON- 
CLUSIONS: Nurses  who  do  not  intend  to  continue  using  the  protocol 
need  to  be  convinced  of  the  advantages  of  working  with  such  a  proto- 
col and  of  its  user-friendliness. 


756 


RESPIRATORY  CARE  .  JULY  2002  VOL  47  NO  7 


Editorials 


Secretion  Clearance  Techniques: 
Absence  of  Proof  or  Proof  of  Absence? 


Healthy  lungs  clear  mucus  from  the  airways  via  the 
mucociliary  escalator.  When  the  mucociliary  escalator  is 
challenged  in  disease,  secretions  are  cleared  with  the  cough 
reflex.  Acute  and  chronic  respiratory  diseases  are  com- 
monly associated  with  increased  respiratory  secretions  due 
to  increased  mucus  production,  impaired  mucociliary  trans- 
port, or  a  weak  cough.  Howe\er.  it  is  unknown  whether 
increased  respiratory  secretions  contribute  to  the  deterio- 
ration of  respiratory  function,  or  whether  this  is  merely  a 
symptom  associated  with  the  progression  of  the  disease. 
Moreover,  increased  mucus  expectoration  does  not  neces- 
sarily imply  mucus  stasis  in  the  airways. 

Clinicians  and  patients  are  troubled  by  respiratory  se- 
cretions, and  standard  practice  calls  for  efforts  to  clear 
these  from  the  lungs.  An  important  proportion  of  respira- 
tory therapists"  time  is  spent  in  efforts  to  remove  secre- 
tions from  the  lower  respiratory  tract.  For  patients  with 
diseases  such  as  cystic  fibrosis  a  great  deal  of  each  day  can 
be  spent  using  techniques  designed  to  enhance  secretion 
clearance.  In  recent  years  a  variety  of  techniques  for  se- 
cretion clearance  ha\e  become  available.  Many  of  these 
techniques  are  described  in  this  issue  of  Respiratory  Care. 
Despite  clinical  enthusiasm  for  many  of  these  by  both 
clinicians  and  patients,  there  is  sparse  high-level  evidence 
demonstrating  benefit  from  many  of  these  techniques.  As 
pointed  out  by  others'  '-*  and  me,'^  there  are  a  number  of 
methodologic  limitations  of  published  reports  of  secretion 
clearance  techniques.  Most  studies  are  small  and  use  cross- 
over designs  (rather  than  randomized  parallel  designs). 
Sham  therapy  was  not  used  in  most  studies — often  one 
technique  was  compared  to  another  (for  example,  chest 
physiotherapy  \  s  positive  expiratory  pressure).  Many  stud- 
ies were  limited  to  short-term  outcomes  such  as  sputum 
clearance  with  a  single  treatment  session.  It  might  be  ar- 
gued that  short-term  outcomes  are  irrelevant  and  that  the 
focus  should  be  on  long-term  outcomes  such  as  disease 
progression.  qualit\  of  life,  and  patient  satisfaction. 

Conducting  a  methodologically  strong  study  (ie.  place- 
bo-controlled prospecti\e  randomized  trial)  with  an  ade- 
quate sample  size  and  iinportant  outcomes  (eg.  disease 
progression,  morbidity,  mortality  i  is  difficult.  Such  a  study 
would  be  expensi\e  and  industrial  support  is  not  likely. 
Moreover,  secretion  clearance  is  an  integral  component  of 
disease  management  for  patients  with  increased  sputum 


production,  raising  seritius  ethical  concerns  about  placebo- 
controlled  studies.  1  have  always  found  it  intriguing  that  a 
new  drug  to  improve  secretion  clearance  must  pass  through 
the  usual  Phase  1  through  Phase  3  approval  process,  whereas 
a  new  device  is  not  subjected  to  the  same  scrutiny. 

Is  absence  of  proof  the  same  as  proof  of  absence?  Does 
the  lack  of  evidence  mean  lack  of  benefit?  Is  the  lack  of 
evidence  due  to  study  methodology,  or  is  there  really  no 
benefit  from  many  techniques  used  to  enhance  secretion 
clearance?  Although  we  should  not  be  dogmatic  about 
endorsing  a  therapy  with  absence  of  proof  of  its  benefit, 
we  must  also  not  be  dogmatic  about  abandoning  a  therapy 
because  of  absence  of  proof  of  its  benefit — absence  of 
proof  is  not  proof  of  absence.  In  fact,  from  a  methodolog- 
ical and  statistical  standpoint,  absence  of  proof  is  very 
difficult  to  prove.  Gi\en  a  lack  of  e\idence.  1  suggest  the 
following  clinical  hierarchy  t)f  questions  when  considering 
secretion  clearance  therapy  for  a  patient. 

1.  Is  there  a  pathophysiologic  rational  for  use  of  the 
therapy?  Is  the  patient  experiencing  difficulty  clearing  se- 
cretions? Are  retained  secretions  affecting  lung  function  in 
an  important  way.  such  as  gas  exchange  or  lung  mechan- 
ics? Remember  that  the  production  of  large  amounts  of 
sputum  does  not  necessarily  mean  that  the  patient  is  ex- 
periencing difficulty  clearing  sputum. 

2.  What  is  the  potential  for  adverse  effects  from  the 
therapy?  Which  therapy  is  likely  to  provide  the  greatest 
benefit  with  the  least  harm? 

3.  What  is  the  cost  of  the  equipment  for  this  therapy? 
Some  devices  are  very  expensive. 

4.  What  are  the  preferences  of  the  patient?  Lacking 
evidence  that  any  technique  is  superior  to  another,  patient 
preference  is  an  important  consideration. 

When  a  decision  is  made  to  try  a  secretion  clearance 
technique,  an  H-of-1  trial  can  be  conducted.'"  "*  For  ex- 
ample, imagine  that  a  decision  is  made  to  try  positive 
expiratory  pressure  therapy  for  a  patient  with  cystic  fibro- 
sis. The  clinician  and  patient  agree  that  a  clinically  useful 
outcome  measure  is  sputum  production.  A  12-week  trial  is 
designed.  For  I  week,  the  only  sputum  clearance  tech- 
nique used  is  huff  coughing.  Fi)r  a  second  week,  positive 
expiratory  pressure  (in  addition  to  huff  coughing)  is  used, 
as  provided  b>  the  manufacturer.  For  a  thiid  week,  the 
positive  expiratory  pressure  device  is  used  v\ith  pressure 


Respiratory  C.\re  •  Jll-i  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


757 


Secretion  Clearance  Techniques:  Absence  of  Proof  or  Proof  of  Absence? 


set  al  such  a  low  le\el  that  it  is  probably  suh-therapoutic 
(sham  therapy).  The  patient  is  naive  to  the  therapy  and 
does  not  knou  whether  the  device  should  be  used  w  ilh  or 
without  the  high-pressure  setting.  The  order  ol' treatments 
is  randomized  (the  patient  flips  a  coin)  and  the  sequence  is 
repeated  4  times.  Each  day.  the  sputum  produced  during 
the  therapy  session  is  weighed.  A  diary  is  also  kept,  in 
vshich  e\enls  such  as  chest  infections  are  logged.  At  the 
end  of  12  weeks  the  results  are  analyzed  (this  may  include 
statistical  analysis),  reviewed  together  by  the  clinician  and 
patient,  and  a  collaborative  decision  is  made  regarding  the 
benefit  of  the  therapy.  In  this  manner  an  objective  decision 
is  made  regarding  the  benefits  oi  the  therapy  for  this  in- 
dividual  patient. 

Despite  the  clinical  observation  that  retained  secretions 
are  detrimental  to  respiratory  function  and  despite  anec- 
dotal associations  between  secretion  clearance  and  im- 
provements in  respiratory  function,  there  is  a  dearth  of 
high-level  evidence  to  support  any  secretion  clearance  tech- 
nique. This  is  problematic,  given  that  secretion  clearance 
is  an  important  aspect  of  respiratory  care  practice.  Al- 
though lack  of  evidence  does  not  mean  lack  of  benefit,  it 
is  desirable  to  have  better  evidence  to  support  the  practice. 
Appropriately  powered  and  methodologically  sound  re- 
search is  desperately  needed.  This  provides  an  opportunity 
for  respiratory  therapists  to  conduct  research  on  a  very 
important  aspect  of  our  practice.  For  the  effective  therapy 
of  our  patients  and  for  the  efficient  use  of  health  care 
resources,  it  is  incumbent  upon  us  to  improve  the  scientific 
basis  for  secretion  clearance  techniques. 

Dean  R  Hess  PhD  RRT  FAARC 

Department  of  Respiratory  Care 

Massachusetts  General  Hospital 

Harvard  Medical  School 

Boston,  Massachusetts 


Correspondence:  Dean  R  Hess  PliD  RRT  F.'V.ARC.  Department  of  Re- 
spiratory Care  Services,  Massacliusetls  General  Hospital. 55  Fruit  Street. 
Ellison  401.  Boston  MA  0211-1-2696.  Email:  (Jliess@partners.org. 


REFERENCES 

1 .  Stiller  K.  Pliysiotherapy  in  intensive  care:  tou  ards  an  evidence-based 
practice.  Chest  20()();1 18(6):1801-I8I3. 

2.  Williams  MT.  Chest  physiotherapy  and  cystic  tlhrosis.  Why  is  the 
most  effective  tbrin  of  treatment  still  unclear?  Chest  1994:106(6): 
IS72-1882. 

3.  Krause  MF.  Hoehn  T.  Chest  physiotherapy  in  mechanically  venti- 
lated children:  a  review.  Crit  Care  Med  2000:28(5):  1648- 1651. 

4.  McCrory  DC.  Brown  C.  Gelfand  SE,  Bach  PB.  Management  of  acute 
exacerbations  of  COPD;  a  summary  and  appraisal  of  published  ev- 
idence. Chest  2001;119(4):l  190-1209. 

5.  Dean  E,  Ross  J.  Discordance  between  cardiopulmonary  physiology 
and  physical  therapy:  toward  a  rational  basis  for  practice.  Chest 
1992:101(61:1694-1698. 

6  Kirilloff  LH.  Owens  GR.  Rogers  RM.  Mazzocco  MC.  Does  chest 
physical  therapy  work.'  Chest  1985:88(31:436-444. 

7.  Wallis  C,  Prasad  A.  Who  needs  chest  physiotherapy?  Moving  from 
anecdote  to  evidence.  Arch  Dis  Child  1999;80(4):393-397. 

8.  Judson  MA.  Sahn  SA.  Mobilization  of  secretions  in  ICU  patients. 
RespirCare  1994:39(3):213-226. 

9.  Eid  N.  Buchheit  J,  Neuling  M,  Phelps  H.  Chest  physiotherapy  in 
review.  Respir  Care  1991:36(4):270-282. 

10.  Thomas  J.  Cook  DJ.  Brooks  D.  Chest  physical  therapy  management 
of  patients  with  cvstic  fibrosis:  a  meta  analysis.  Am  J  Respir  Cril 
Care  Med  1995:151(3  Pt  1): 846-850. 

1 1.  Jones  A,  Rowe  BH.  Bronchopulmonary  hygiene  physical  therapy  in 
bronchiectasis  and  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease:  a  system- 
atic review.  Hean  Lung  2000;29(2):125-135. 

12.  Thomas  J,  DeHueck  A.  Kleiner  M.  Newton  J,  Crowe  J,  Mahler  S. 
To  \  ibrate  or  not  to  vibrate:  usefulness  of  the  mechanical  vibrator 
for  clearing  bronchial  secretions.  Physiother  Can  1 995:47(2 ):  120- 
125. 

13.  van  der  Schans  C.  Prasad  A.  Main  E.  Chest  physiotherapy  compared 
to  no  chest  physiotherapy  for  cystic  fibrosis.  Cochrane  Database  Syst 
Rev  2000;(2):CD001401. 

14.  Flenady  VJ.  Gray  PH.  Chest  physiotherapy  for  preventing  morbidity 
in  babies  being  extubated  from  mechanical  ventilation.  Cochrane 
Database  Syst  Rev  20O0;(2):CDO0O283. 

15.  Hess  DR.  The  evidence  for  secretion  clearance  techniques.  Respir 
Care  2001:46(  1 1  ):1276-1293. 

16.  Guyatt  G.  Sackett  D.  Taylor  DW.  Chong  J.  Roberts  R.  Pugsley  S. 
Determining  optimal  therapy:  randomized  trials  in  individual  pa- 
tients. N  Engl  J  Med  19S6;3I4(  14):889-892. 

17.  Guyatt  G.  Sackett  D.  Adachi  J,  Roberts  R.  Chong  J.  Rosenbloom  D, 
Keller  J.  A  clinician's  guide  for  conducting  randomized  trials  in 
individual  patients.  CMAJ  1988;l39(6):497-503. 

18.  Montori  VM.  Guyatt  GH.  What  is  evidence-ba.sed  medicine  and  why 
should  it  be  practiced'  RespirCare  2()01:46(  1 1  ):1201-I21 1. 


758 


Respirators  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Foreword 


New  Horizons  in  Respiratory  Care: 
Airway  Clearance  Techniques 


It  was  an  honor  to  co-chair  the  17th  Annual  New  Ho- 
rizons Symposium  at  the  American  Association  tor  Respi- 
ratory Care's  International  Respiratory  Congress  in  San 
Antonio,  Texas,  on  December  2,  2001.  The  New  Horizons 
Symposium  has  been  a  landmark  feature  of  the  meeting 
for  17  years.  This  full-afternoon  session  provides  a  com- 
prehensive, focused,  and  multi-dimensional  exploration  of 
a  key  aspect  of  the  practice  of  respiratory  care,  usually 
reviewing  areas  of  evolving  clinical  practice.  In  many  in- 
stances the  manuscripts  from  the  symposium  are  then  pub- 
lished in  a  special  issue  of  Respirator'.  Cari-:. 

Airway  mucus  is  a  critically  important  host  defense. 
Normal  mechanisms  for  mobilization  of  secretions  include 
mucociliary  transport,  autocephalad  flow  (secretions  mov- 
ing toward  the  central  airway  during  normal  breathing), 
and  cough.  Mucus  hypersecretion  and  impaired  mucus 
clearance  can  be  serious  problems,  leading  to  discomfort, 
dyspnea,  airway  obstruction,  atelectasis,  infection,  bron- 
chiectasis, and  pulmonary  disability.  As  respiratory  care 
has  evolved  as  a  profession,  airway  secretion  clearance  has 
always  been  part  of  our  scope  of  practice.'  -*  Terms  such 
as  "bronchial  hygiene"  and  "pulmonary  toilet"  have  been 
used  to  characterize  the  process  of  assisting  patients  to 
clear  airway  secretions.  Too  often,  however,  those  terms 
have  been  associated  only  with  postural  drainage,  percus- 
sion and  vibration,  or  mechanical  aspiration  of  the  airways 
in  acutely  ill  patients. 

Over  the  past  40  years  we  have  come  to  better  under- 
stand the  mechanisms  of  airway  clearance  in  health  and 
disease,  and  this  has  led  to  the  development  of  devices 
and  techniques  to  assist  in  secretion  removal.  The  amount 
and  quality  of  evidence  from  rigorously  conducted,  ran- 
domized clinical  trials  in  support  of  these  diverse  tech- 
niques varies  widely.^  However,  most  of  the  techniques 
are  based  on  physiologic  rationale  and  are  at  least  sup- 
ported by  case  studies. - 

This  year's  New  Horizons  Symposium  began  with  a 
review  of  the  "Physiology  of  Airway  Mucus  Clearance" 
(Bruce  Rubin).  The  major  bronchial  hygiene  techniques 
were  reviewed  in  "Positioning  Versus  Postural  Drainage" 
(Jim  Fink).  "Airway  Physiology,  Autogenic  Drainage,  and 


Active  Cycle  of  Breathing"  (Craig  Lapin).  "Positive  Pres- 
sure Techniques"  (Jim  Fink),  and  "High-Frequency  Oscil- 
lation of  the  Airway  and  Chest  Wall"  (Mike  Mahlmeister 
and  Jim  Fink).  Kathy  Davidson  discussed  "Airway  Clear- 
ance Strategies  for  the  Pediatric  Patient"  and  presented 
strategies  for  introducing  these  techniques  as  the  patient 
develops  from  infancy  through  to  adulthood.  Robert  Lewis 
then  reviewed  key  practice  considerations  for  the  intu- 
bated patient  in  or  out  of  the  intensive  care  unit  in  "Airway 
Clearance  Techniques  for  the  Patient  with  an  Artificial 
Airway."  Dr  Rubin's  review  of  "The  Pharmacologic  Ap- 
proach to  Airway  Clearance:  Mucoactive  Agents"  then 
summarized  the  state  of  the  art  for  medical  management  of 
secretion  retention. 

As  we  concluded  the  symposium  it  was  clear  that  we 
had  not  addressed  one  potentially  valuable  method  of  air- 
way clearance:  ultra-low-frequency  airway  oscillation,  bet- 
ter known  as  the  Insuftlator/Exsuftlator  (Fig.  I).  This  de- 
vice has  been  studied  for  more  than  50  years.  Evidence 
suggests  that  it  is  an  effective  method  to  assist  airway 
clearance  in  debilitated  patients  or  in  those  with  severe 
neuromuscular  weakness. 

The  symposium  participants  agreed  that  although  there 
may  be  few  data  to  unequivocally  support  the  use  of  many 
of  these  techniques,  there  is  strong  observational  evidence 


Fig.  1.  Mechanical  In-Exsufflator.  (Courtesy  JH  Emerson  Com- 
pany, Cambridge,  Massachusetts.) 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


7.59 


New  Horizons  in  Respirators  Care:  Airway  Clearance  Techniques 


Order  Tor  poslural 
drainage 


Poilurat  diiintgc  noi 

indicaied  Evaluiic  for 

lung  expansion 


Tutu  frequenlly 

Inmate  PAP 

Assure  sec  re  Hon 

ticarancc  from  airway 


Inslnici  m  directed 

cough.  ACB.FET 


Instruct  in  dcrp  breathing,      ^ 
splinting,  and  dirccied  cough 


fcncourage  patici 
dcep-brcaihc  and 


Iniiiatfr'intmjci  to  uic 
incentive  spi(timeir> 
every  hour  while  avt^kc 


Fig.  2.  Flow  diagrams  for  protocolized  treatment  options  in  response 
to  order  for  (A)  postural  drainage  and  (B)  lung  expansion  therapy. 
ACB  =  active  cycle  of  breathing  technique.  ASAP  =  as  soon  as  pos- 
sible. CF  =  cystic  fibrosis.  FET  =  forced  expiratory  technique.  HFO  = 
high-frequency  oscillation.  IPPB  =  intermittent  positive  pressure  breath- 
ing. PAP  =  positive  airway  pressure.  PEP  =  positive  expiratory  pressure. 
(Adapted  from  Reference  1 .) 


that  suggest  that  many  of  these  techniques  can  have  a  role 
in  nu)bili/ing  secretions,  reducing  dyspnea,  and  helping 
patients  mainlain  paleni  airways.  Selection  of  a  "best" 
technique  is  currenlly  more  of  an  art  than  a  science  and 
depends  greatly  on  the  patient's  underlying  condition,  level 
of  functioning  and  understanding,  and  ability  and  willing- 
ness to  perform  the  technique  and  integrate  it  into  normal 
daily  routines.  For  the  clinician,  the  decision  diagrams  in 
Figure  2  represent  one  approach  for  technique  selection. 
Education  is  key  to  the  success  of  any  technique.  The 
better  a  patient  understands  a  technique  the  better  chance 
the  patient  has  of  adopting  it  appropriately. 

Future  research  needs  to  better  define  and  refine  tech- 
niques in  use  and  to  incorporate  good  study  designs  in 
well-powered  clinical  trials  that  use  meaningful  out- 
coines.  As  an  example,  although  often  measured,  the 
volume  of  expectorated  sputum  is  of  limited  or  no  value 
in  determining  the  clinical  effectiveness  of  these  de- 
vices and  techniques.  Measuring  the  frequency  of  pvo- 
tocol-defined  exacerbations,  antibiotic  use.  unplanned 
physician  visits,  hospitalizations,  or  missed  days  of  work 
or  school  appears  to  be  of  greater  clinical  and  scientific 
relevance.  The  more  that  we  as  a  profession  invest  in 
learning,  teaching,  and  studying  these  techniques,  the 
greater  the  chance  that  our  patients  can  benefit  from 
their  use. 

James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FAARC 

Fellow,  Respiratory  Science 

Aerogen  Incorporated 

San  Francisco.  California 

Bruce  K  Rubin  MEngr  MD  FAARC 

Department  of  Pediatrics 

Wake  Forest  University  School  of  Medicine 

Winston-Salem.  North  Carolina 


REFERENCES 

1.  Fink  JB.  Bronchial  hygiene  and  lung  expansion.  In:  Fink  JB.  Hum  .1, 
editors.  Clinical  practice  of  respiratory  care.  Philadelphia:  Ra\en- 
Lippincott:  1999. 

2.  Fink  JB,  Hess  DR.  Secretion  clearance  techniques.  In:  Hess  DR. 
Maclntyre  NR,  et  al.  editors.  Respiratory  care:  principles  and  prac- 
lices.  Philadelphia:  W'B  Saunders:  2002. 

3.  American  Association  lor  Respiratory  Care.  A.ARC  Clinical  Practice 
Guideline:  Postural  drainage  therapy.  Respir  Care  1 99 1 :36(l  2 ):  1 4 1 8- 
1426. 

4.  Fink  JB,  King  M.  Mechanical  methods  of  mucus  clearance.  In:  Rubin 
B.  Van  der  Schans  CP.  editors.  Therapy  for  mucus  clearance  disorders: 
lung  biology  in  health  and  disea.se.  New  York:  Marcel  Dekker  (in  press). 

.s.  Hess  DR.  The  evidence  for  secretion  clearance  techniques.  Respir 
Care  200I:46(  1 1  ):I276-I292. 


760 


Respiratory  Care  •  Jli.'i  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Symposium  Papers 


Physiology  of  Airway  Mucus  Clearance 

Bruce  K  Rubin  MEngr  MD  FAARC 


Introduction 

Role  of  Mucus  in  Mucociliary  Clearance 

Mucus  Properties 

Sputum 
Cilia 

Airway  Surfactant 
Cough  Clearance 

Role  of  Inflammation 

Chest  Physical  Therapy 
Summary 

Respiratory  tract  secretions  consist  of  mucus,  surfactant,  and  periciliary  fluid.  The  airway  surface 
fluid  is  present  as  a  bilayer,  with  a  superficial  gel  or  mucous  layer  and  a  layer  of  periciliary  fiuid 
interposed  between  the  mucous  layer  and  the  epithelium.  A  thin  layer  of  surfactant  separates  the 
mucous  and  periciliary  fluid  layers.  The  mucous  layer  extends  from  the  intermediate  airway  to  the 
upper  airway  and  is  approximately  2-10  juim  thick  in  the  trachea.  Airway  mucus  is  the  secretory 
product  of  the  goblet  cells  and  the  submucosal  glands.  It  is  a  nonhomogeneous,  adhesive,  viscoelastic 
gel  composed  of  water,  carbohydrates,  proteins,  and  lipids.  In  health,  the  mucous  gel  is  primarily 
composed  of  a  3-dimensional  tangled  polymer  network  of  mucous  glycoproteins  or  mucin.  Mucin 
macromolecules  are  TO-SO'??  carbohydrate,  20%  protein,  and  1-2 '7f  sulfate  bound  to  oligosaccha- 
ride side  chains.  The  protein  backbones  of  mucins  are  encoded  by  mucin  genes  (MUC  genes),  at 
least  8  of  which  are  expressed  in  the  respiratory  tract,  although  MUC5AC  and  MUC5B  are  the  2 
principal  gel-forming  mucins  secreted  in  the  airway.  Mucus  is  transported  from  the  lower  respi- 
ratory tract  into  the  pharynx  by  air  fiow  and  mucociliary  clearance.  Kxpectorated  sputum  is 
composed  of  lower  respiratory  tract  secretions  along  with  nasopharyngeal  and  oropharyngeal 
secretions,  cellular  debris,  and  microorganisms.  Disruption  of  normal  secretion  or  mucociliary 
clearance  impairs  pulmonary  function  and  lung  defense  and  increases  risk  of  infection.  When  there 
is  extensive  ciliary  damage  and  mucus  hypersecretion,  airflow -dependent  mucus  clearance  such  as 
cough  becomes  critically  important  for  airway  hygiene.  Key  words:  imiciis.  sputum,  coiii^h.  cilia, 
miicociliitrx  cli'tirancc.  siirfactiint.  suhniucdSdl  i^lmuls.  golylet  cells,  cystic  fibrosis,  chronic  bronchitis, 
asthma.     [Respir  Care  2002;47(7):761-7681 


Introduction  estimated  that  mucus  secretion  volume  is  between  10  and 

100  mL  per  day  in  health.'  Airway  mucus  is  a  viscoelastic 
Mucus  secretion  and  clearance  are  extremely  important 
for  airway  integrity  and  pulmonary  defense.  It  has  been 


Horizons  Symposium  :il  llic  47lh  liucriiLilion;il  Rcsplruloiy  Congress,  San 

Antonio.  Texas,  December  14.  20(11. 

Bruce  K  Rubin  MEngr  MD  FAARC  is  afhlialed  uitli  the  Department  of 

Pediatrics,  Wake  Forest  University  School  of  Medicine,  Winston-Salem,  Correspondence:  Bruce  K  Rubin  MEngr  MD  FAARC.  Department 

North  Carohna  "'  Pediatrics.  Wake  Forest  llniversily  School  ol  Medicine,  Medical  Cen- 

ter   Boulevard.    Wmsion-Salem    NC    27 1. 'iV- 1  OX  I.    E-mail:    brubin@ 
Dr  Rubin  presented  a  version  of  this  report  at  the   17th  .'Annual  Nevi  vvfubmc.edu. 


Respiratory  Care  •  Jl  ly  2002  Voi  47  No  7  761 


Phvsioi  or,y  of  Airway  Mucus  Clearance 


Mucus  Flow 


Surfactant 
Layer 


Mucous  Gland 


Mucous  Gland 

Fig.  1 .  Ciliary  clearance  versus  cough  clearance.  Top:  Airway  epithelium,  cilia,  and  surlactant  and  mucous  layer  during  normal  operation 
of  cilia.  Bottom:  Mucus  hypersecretion  and  cough  clearance  in  the  presence  of  ciliary  dysfunction. 


gel  containing  water,  carbohydrates,  proteins,  and  lipids. - 
It  is  the  secretory  product  of  the  mucous  cells  (the  goblet 
cells  of  the  airway  surface  epithelium  and  the  submucosal 
glands).  Mucus  is  transported  from  the  lower  respiratory 
tract  into  the  pharynx  by  air  flow  and  mucociliary  clear- 
ance. In  hinnan  large  airways,  and  in  many  larger  species 
of  mammal,  the  capacity  to  secrete  mucus  in  response  to  a 
stimulus  seems  to  lie  principally  in  the  glands.  However, 
at  rest,  goblet  cells  may  contribute  a  greater  fraction  to  the 
total  mucus  volume,  considering  the  contribution  of  distal 


airways,  where  surface  mucous  cells  are  found  in  the  ab- 
sence of  submucosal  glands.^ 

Mucus  consists  of  a  superficial  gel  or  mucous  layer  and 
a  liquid  or  periciliary  fluid  layer  that  bathes  the  epithelial 
cilia.  These  2  layers  are  separated  by  a  thin  layer  of  sur- 
factant (Fig.  I  ).■*  In  health,  the  mucous  layer  is  about  2-5 
jum  thick  in  the  trachea,  and  it  extends  from  the  bronchi- 
oles to  the  upper  airway.  The  periciliary  fluid  layer  lies 
between  the  cell  surface  and  the  mucous  layer  at  a  depth 
that  is  just  less  than  the  height  of  a  fully  extended  cilium. 


762 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Pti^sioKKiY  o\-  Airway  Mucus  Clearance 


Mlicus  protects  the  cpitheliLiiii  from  tbiviiin  nuitcrlal  and 
trom  nuici  loss.^  The  depth  and  composition  of  mucus 
depends  on  secretion  from  airway  glands,  goblet  cell  dis- 
charge, and  active  ion  transport  across  sinface  epithelium." 

Sputum  consists  of  lower  respiratory  tract  secretions, 
nasopharyngeal  and  oropharyngeal  material  (including  sa- 
liva), microorganisms,  and  cells.  When  there  is  mucous 
hypersecretion  and  impaired  clearance,  abnormal  respira- 
tory secretions  can  impair  pulmonary  function,  reduce  lung 
defenses,  and  increase  the  risk  of  infection  and  possibly 
neoplasia.^ 

The  collection  of  normal  mucus  for  analysis  requires 
sampling  from  endotracheal  tubes,  bronchial  aspirates  from 
healthy  animals  or  persons,  or  .secreted  material  from  an- 
imal trachea  or  human  bronchial  explants.**  Commonly  the 
study  of  airway  secretions  consists  of  examining  expecto- 
rated sputum,  but  that  material  would  give  only  limited 
insight  into  the  properties  of  native,  uninfected  mucus. 

Role  of  Mucus  in  Mucociliary  Clearance 

In  health,  mucus  forms  a  discrete  5-20  ;u,m  layer  that 
rests  at  the  tips  of  the  cilia.  The  cilia  are  bathed  in  peri- 
ciliary  fluid  that  is  thought  to  be  an  ideal  (Newtonian) 
liquid  of  low  viscosity.  The  volume  of  periciliary  fluid 
appears  to  be  regulated  by  surface  epithelial  cells. ''  In  the 
cartilaginous  conducting  airways  the  mucous  layer  forms 
an  uninterrupted  blanket  that  prevents  airway  dehydration 
and  plays  an  important  role  in  entrapping  and  clearing 
inhaled  particulate  matter  and  cellular  debris.  There  is  some 
evidence  that  mucus  forms  discrete  and  discontinuous  rafts 
in  smaller  airways,  and  there  is  little  if  any  mucus  in  the 
terminal  airways.*^  Although  this  has  not  been  verified  in 
humans,  animal  studies  suggest  that  mucous  layer  discon- 
tinuity is  a  function  of  airway  diameter  and  that  the  rheo- 
logic  properties  of  mucus  are  also  strongly  related  to  air- 
way diameter.'"  This  makes  sense,  as  airtlow-associated 
particulate  deposition  and  fluid  loss  are  probably  more 
important  in  the  larger  conducting  airways.  There  is  also 
the  theoretical  observation  that  if  mucus  secretion  volume 
and  clearance  were  constant  at  all  anatomic  levels,  the 
proximal  airways  would  rapidly  become  flooded  by  the 
waves  of  mucus  welling  up  from  the  large  surface  area  of 
the  terminal  airways. 

Mucus  consists  primarily  of  water  and  is  thought  to 
have  only  5-7%  solid  material,  consisting  principally  of 
mucins  but  also  containing  secreted  antimicrobial  proteins 
and  peptides,  phospholipids,  and  particulate  and  cellular 
debris.' '  Mucins  are  large  glycoproteins  that  are  expressed 
in  2  forms:  the  secreted  gel-forming  mucins  that  form  the 
mucous  gel  layer  and  the  membrane-tethered  mucins 
present  on  the  epithelial  surface,  which  may  act  as  cell 
surface  receptors.  Mucin  glycoproteins  range  in  size  from 
several  hundred  to  several  thousand  kilo-Daltons.  Most  of 


ilie  molecular  mass  of  ilie  glycoprotein  consist  of  the  oli- 
gosaccharide sugars  that  link  to  the  serine-  and  threonine- 
rich  protein  core  called  apomucin  (Fig.  2).  The  principal 
secreted  mucins  that  form  the  airway  mucous  gel  are 
MUC5AC  and  MUC5B,  the  former  being  primarily  a  prod- 
uct of  the  surface  goblet  cells  and  the  latter  mostly  se- 
creted from  the  submucosal  glands.'-  The  glycosylated 
mucin  proteins  form  a  gel  by  linearly  polymerizing  as 
mucin  oligomers,  resulting  in  very  long  and  extended  mol- 
ecules, which  form  a  tangled  network.  This  tangled  net- 
work produces  a  gel  of  fairly  low  viscosity  and  elasticity, 
permitting  it  to  be  easily  secreted  and  cleared  by  the  cilia. 
Airway  mucus  is  cleared  by  2  principal  mechanisms: 
mucociliary  clearance  and  airflow  interaction  (see  Fig.  1). 
Cough  clearance  becomes  more  important  as  lung  disease 
de\elops.^  Model  studies  suggest  that  mucociliary  cleitrance 
depends  on  maintaining  the  depth  of  periciliiiry  tluid."  The 
noimal  daily  volume  of  respiratory  secretion  arriving  at  the 
larynx  is  estimated  to  be  approximately  I  (J  mL. 

Mucus  Properties 

Serous  fluid  viscosity  and  depth  probably  affect  muco- 
ciliary clearance.  If  the  serous  fluid  is  too  viscous  the  cilia 
will  not  be  able  to  move  as  well  and  the  decreased  ciliary 
tip  velocity  will  decrease  inucociliary  clearance.  This  prin- 
ciple is  well  established  for  water  propelling  cilia,  but  for 
the  periciliary  fluid  in  the  2-layer  mucociliary  system  the 
serous  fluid  viscosity  is  unknown.  Active  ion  transport  and 
its  associated  transepithelial  water  tlux''  are  probably  im- 
portant in  modulating  serous  fluid  viscosity.  Tran.sepithe- 
lial  protein  fluxes  may  also  contribute  to  serous  fluid  vis- 
cosity.'"* The  efficient  transfer  of  momentum  between  the 
cilia  and  the  mucous  layer  requires  that  the  cilia  firmly 
contact  the  mucus  during  their  forward  stroke  while  min- 
imally interacting  with  it  during  the  return.  Mucociliary 
clearance  will  probably  also  decrease  if  the  serous  fluid  is 
too  deep  or  too  shallow. 

Mucous  factors  affecting  mucociliary  clearance  are  the 
mucus  depth  and  viscoelasticity.^  Although  deep  mucus 
hinders  clearance  by  cilia,  it  is  better  suited  to  clearance  by 
coughing.'^  Both  viscosity  and  elasticity  are  essential  for 
the  clearance  of  airway  secretions.  Viscosity  (energy  loss) 
is  a  property  of  liquids  and  an  ideal  (Newtonian)  liquid 
and  can  be  described  strictly  in  terms  of  viscosity.  An  ideal 
(Hookian)  solid  is  described  entirely  by  elasticity  or  en- 
ergy storage  with  an  applied  stress.  A  non-Newtonian  gel 
such  as  mucus  has  both  viscous  and  elastic  properties  (Fig. 
3).  The  elastic  component  is  essential  for  beating  cilia  to 
transmit  kinetic  energy  to  the  mucus.  Viscosity  is  also 
essential  for  effective  clearance.  Patients  who  have  liquid- 
like bronchorrhea  are  unable  to  clear  secretions  effectively. 
Mucociliary  clearance  is  much  more  sensitive  to  high  lev- 
els of  viscositv.  although  high  levels  of  elasticity  may  also 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


763 


Physioi.ogy  of  Airway  Miiri's  Clearance 


Oligosaccharide  side  chain 


Serine 


Threonine 


Fig.  2.  Gel-forming  airway  mucins  are  large  glycoproteins  that  are  secreted  to  form  the  mucous  gel  layer.  Most  of  the  molecular  mass  of 
the  glycoprotein  consist  of  the  oligosaccharide  sugars  that  link  to  the  serine-  and  threonine-rich  protein  core  called  apomucin. 


impede  eiliary  transport."'  A  balance  between  these  fac- 
tors must  be  maintained  (or  optimal  effect  on  mucociliary 
clearance. '^ 

Sputum 

Expectorated  sputum  is  a  sign  of  disease  and  indicates 
excessive  production  (hypersecretion)  and  retention  (im- 
paired clearance),  as  occurs  in  patients  with  respiratory 
infection,  bronchitis,  asthma,  bronchiectasis,  and  cystic  fi- 
brosis (CF),  When  purulent  secretions  are  expectorated 
this  substance  is  called  sputum. 

The  characteristics  of  mucus  change  with  infection  and 
innammation.  Intlammation  leads  to  mucus  hypersecre- 
tion, ciliary  dysfunction,  and  changes  in  the  composition 
and  property  of  airway  secretions.  Inflammatory  cells,  par- 
ticularly neutrophils,  (hat  are  recruited  to  the  air\\a\  to 
combat  infection  disappear  from  the  airway  either  through 
progranniied  cell  death  (apoptosis)  or  by  necrosis.  Ne- 
crotic neutiophils  release  prointlanmiatory  mediators  thai 
damage  the  epithelium  and  reciiiit  nn)ie  inflanniiatory  cells. 
They  also  release  deoxyribonucleic  acid  (DNA)  and  fila- 
mentous actin  (F-aclin)  from  the  cytt)skelelon.  DNA  and 
F-actin  copolynieri/e  to  form  a  second  rigid  nelvsork  w  ithin 
airway  secieiions.'^  Neiitrophil-deri\ed  myelopero.xidase 
imparts  a  characterisdc  green  color  to  intlamed  airway 
secretions,  and  thickened  and  green  secretions  are  usually 
described  as  purulcni. 


Cilia 

Mucociliary  clearance  also  depends  on  the  function  of 
the  cilia  and  the  interactions  between  cilia  and  mucus.  The 
conducting  airways  are  largely  covered  by  a  columnar 
pseudo-stratified  ciliated  epithelium.  Each  cell  has  approx- 
imately 200  cilia,  which  propel  mucus  by  beating  in  a 
coordinated,  metachronal  fashion  toward  the  larynx.  Cilia 
are  motile  projections  from  the  polarized  surface  of  the 
epithelial  cell.  The  ciliary  "motor"'  is  dri\'en  by  the  dynein- 
tubulin  interaction  (Fig.  4).  This  adenosine  5 '-triphosphate 
(ATP)-dependenl  contraction  and  relaxation  are  similar  to 
the  actin-m\osin  interaction  that  leads  to  contraction  of 
cardiac  and  skeletal  muscle.  The  coordinated  beating  of 
cilia  is  internally  regulated  by  the  cell;  ciliar\'  incoordina- 
tion is  one  of  the  early  signs  of  airway  intlammation. 

Ciliary  factors  that  affect  mucus  clearance  are  mainly 
ciliarv  amplitude  and  beat  frequencN.  which  together  de- 
termine the  maximum  velocity  at  the  tips  of  the  cilia.  In 
principle,  the  faster  the  cilia  beat  the  faster  the  mucociliary 
clearance,  although  there  are  few  published  data  support- 
ing this  in  \  is ().'''  Longer  cilia  should  be  able  to  clear 
mucus  faster  because  they  can  generate  a  greater  forward 
\elocit\ .  A  I'lillv  extended  tracheal  cilium  is  approximately 
7  /xm  long.  In  smaller  airways  the  cilia  are  generally  shorter 
and  fewer  in  nmiiber  than  in  the  large  bronchi,  and  even 
though  cilia  beat  frequency  may  be  comparable,  the  rate  of 
nuimentum  iranst'er  to  the  mucus  is  proportionately  less.  In 


764 


RiiSPiRATORY  Cari^  •  JuL'i  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Physiology  oi-  Airway  Muc^us  Clearance 


Strain 

or 

Displace  rnent 


A  Ideal  Solid 


B  Ideal  Liquid 


C:  Viscoelastic 
Material 


Time 

Fig.  3.  Responses  of  different  types  of  material  to  stress  and  strain, 
known  as  viscoelastic  properties.  Application  of  stress  or  force  (Y 
axis)  over  time  (X  axis)  produces  the  responses  sfiown:  A.  An  ideal 
or  Hookian  solid  responds  to  a  stress  by  energy  storage  or  elas- 
ticity: tfiis  energy  is  released  wfien  tfie  strain  is  removed.  B.  An 
ideal  or  Newtonian  liquid  responds  to  stress  by  deforming  contin- 
uously with  no  energy  storage;  this  rate  of  deformation  or  energy 
loss  is  viscosity.  C.  A  viscoelastic  gel  initially  stores  energy  like  a 
solid  but,  with  continued  strain,  will  then  deform  more  like  a  liquid. 
(From  Reference  4,  with  permission.) 


ullraslriic'liii;il  iilinoriiialiliL's  ot  cilia.''  I'hc  liiaci  ol  situs 
inversus,  chronic  bronchiectasis,  and  male  infertility  is  re- 
ferreil  to  as  Kartagcner  syndrome,  based  on  a  1933  pub- 
lication describing  4  patients  Vk-ith  this  symptom  associa- 
tion.-- Although  persons  with  PCD  often  develop  recurrent 
chest  infections  and  bronchiectasis,  the  majority  of  these 
people  ha\e  a  normal  life  expectancy  and  can  be  treated  by 
avoiding  aero-irritanls  and  by  receiving  antibiotic  therapy 
for  exacerbations  of  disease.  Because  this  is  very  different 
from  the  shortened  life  expectancy  of  persons  with  C\\  it 
is  generally  acknowledged  that  the  primary  airway  defect 
in  CF  is  not  one  of  altered  mucociliary  clearance. 

Acute  and  chronic  airway  intlammation  can  also  lead  to 
acquired  ciliary  dysfunction  and  to  sloughing  of  the  cili- 
ated epithelium,  with  disruption  of  the  mucociliary  eleva- 
tor. With  chronic  airway  inflammation  the  cilia  can  be- 
come entangled  in  the  mucus  network,  making  it  even 
more  difficult  to  clear  those  secretions.  Characteristic  ab- 
normalities in  PCD  are  discrete  frt)m  those  seen  with  ac- 
quired ciliary  dysfunction.  In  PCD  the  ultrastructural  ab- 
normalities in  the  dynein  arms,  nexin  links,  radial  spokes, 
and  ciliary  length  or  orientation  are  consistently  seen  in 
the  majority  of  cilia.  With  acquired  cilia  dysfunction  these 
abnormalities  are  seen  less  commonly,  and  large  fusion 
cilia  (megacilia)  are  more  the  norm.-' 


these  small  airways,  mucus  clearance  is  augmented  by 
autocephalad  flow:  there  is  a  slightly  greater  flow  during 
exhalation  than  during  inhalation,  particularly  in  the  distal 
lung.  Furthermore,  there  is  a  small  but  significant  decrease 
in  resistance  across  the  length  of  each  airway  as  these 
slowly  merge  and  enlarge  throughout  the  bronchial  tree. 
Together  these  mechanisms  contribute  to  the  progressive 
mobilization  of  distal  secretions  up  the  airway  toward  the 
trachea  and  larynx. 

More  than  50  congenital  abnormalities  of  ciliary  struc- 
ture or  function  have  been  described  as  causing  primary 
ciliary  dyskinesia  (PCD).  Although  once  termed  "immo- 
tile  cilia  syndrome."  it  is  now  recognized  that  many  of 
these  genetic  abnormalities  produce  cilia  that  are  motile 
but  ineffective  at  propelling  mucus  (dyskinetic).  Embryo- 
logically.  normal  ciliary  function  coordinates  the  rotation 
of  the  thoracic  and  abdominal  viscera,  so  patients  with 
PCD  have  a  50%  chance  of  having  mirror-image  reversal 
of  cardiac  and  abdominal  viscera,  referred  to  as  situs  in- 
versus totalis.  Because  spermatic  flagella  have  the  same 
ultrastructure  as  cilia,  and  flagellar  development  is  gener- 
ally under  the  same  genetic  control  as  ciliary  development, 
most  male  patients  with  PCD  are  infertile.  Chronic  sinus- 
itis and  chronically  draining  ears  (chronic  otitis  media)  are 
nearly  universal  in  patients  with  PCD.-"  The  clinical  syn- 
drome of  PCD  was  first  described  in  1901  by  Oeri.  but  in 
the  mid-1970s  Afzelius  first  showed  that  PCD  was  due  to 


Airway  Surfactant 

There  is  increasing  evidence  that  a  surfactant  phospho- 
lipid layer  lies  between  the  periciliary  fluid  layer  and  the 
mucous  gel.  This  surfactant  layer  has  been  observed  his- 
tologically* and  is  thought  to  be  responsible  for  effective 
spreading  of  mucus  as  it  is  secreted  from  the  submucosal 
glands,  preservation  of  the  discrete  integrity  of  the  peri- 
ciliary fluid  and  the  mucous  gel,  and  effective  mucociliary 
interaction  allowing  the  beating  cilia  to  transmit  energy  to 
the  mucous  gel  without  becoming  entangled  in  the  mu- 
cus.-"* In  the  course  of  many  inflammatory  airway  dis- 


outer  sheath 


outer 

microtubule  — 
doublet 


radial  spoke 


centra  I 
mici'O  tubule 


Fig.  4.  Cross-section  of  ciliary  ultrastructure. 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


765 


PiiYsioi.oGY  OF  Airway  Mucus  Clearance 


eases,  secretory  plmspholi pases  A2  (sPLA2)  are  secreted, 
which  can  clea\e  arachitionic  acid  from  cell  membranes, 
leading  lo  ilie  generation  of  ieukotrienes  via  the  lipoxy- 
genase pathway  and  prostaglandins,  kinins.  and  thrombox- 
ane \  ia  the  cyck)o\ygenase  pathway.  However,  these  phos- 
pholipases  also  avidly  hydrolyze  surfactant  phospholipids, 
including  phosphotidal  glycerol  and  dipalmitoyl  phospholi- 
dylcholine.^^  Surfactant  hsdrolysis  disrupts  this  protective 
surfactant  layer,  and  it  is  thought  that  the  lyso-phospho- 
lipids  generated  by  the  action  of  phospholipases  on  sur- 
factants are  themselves  pro-inllammalory  and  lead  to  in- 
crea.sed  mucoadhesion.-''  Airway  surfactants  are  thought 
to  be  derived  from  the  serous  cells  of  submucosal  glands 
and  from  the  distal  airw  ays  and  alveoli.  Persons  with  chronic 
intlammatory  lung  diseases  such  as  CF.  chronic  bronchi- 
tis, and  asthma  have  decreased  amounts  of  bronchial  sur- 
factant and  in  many  cases  increased  amounts  of  airway 
lyso-phospholipids.  Aerosolized  surfactant  has  been  shown 
to  be  effective  in  promoting  mucociliary  clearance  in  pa- 
tients with  chrt)nic  bronchitis  and  CF.  leading  to  signifi- 
cant improvement  in  pulmonary  function.-^ 

Cough  Clearance 

In  lung  diseases  characterized  by  mucus  hypersecretion 
and  impaired  airway  clearance,  the  excess  mucus  is  largely 
expectorated  by  coughing.  A  cough  is  a  complex  reflex  arc 
that  begins  with  the  stimulation  of  an  irritant  receptor. 
Effective  cough  depends  on  high  gas  How  and  intratho- 
racic pressures  to  enhance  mucus  removal.-**  Cough  is  in- 
effective when  respiratory  muscles  are  weak  or  when  mu- 
cus adheres  to  the  airway  wall.  The  cough  clearability  of 
mucus  simulants  increases  with  the  increasing  depth  of  the 
mucous  layer  and  is  inversely  related  to  mucus  elasticity, 
cohesivity.  and  adhesivity.-''  Mucus  tenacity,  the  product 
of  adhesivity  and  cohesivity.  is  a  powerful  determinant  of 
cough  transportability. -■*  Cough  transportability  is  less  depen- 
dent on  viscosity.  In  fact,  preliminaiy  studies  suggest  that  for 
mucus  with  similar  degrees  of  tenacity,  cough  transpoilabil- 
ity  is  increascil  by  increasing  sputum  viscosity. 

Role  of  Inflammation 

Hypersecretion  is  usually  induced  by  products  of  in- 
Hammation  and  infection.'"  Inflammatory  mediators  can 
increase  mucus  secretion  as  a  general  response  to  airway 
insult.  Changes  in  the  airway  microenvironment.  such  as 
pH  and  osmolarity  changes,  can  also  acutely  increase  se- 
cretion and  may  activate  intlammatory  mediators  that  can 
also  lead  to  acute  increase  in  secretion."  Chronic  exposure 
to  inllammation  can  lead  to  hypertrophy  and  hyperplasia 
of  both  goblet  cells  and  submucosal  glanils.  When  there  is 
extensive  damage  to  the  mucociliary  apparatus,  these  se- 


cretions must  be  cleared  by  airflow  mechanisms,  primarily 
cough. 

For  paticiUs  with  poor  nuicociliary  clearance  and  mucus 
hypersecretion,  airway  hygiene  can  be  improved  by  inter- 
ventions that  decrease  the  burden  ot  airway  secretions. 
This  includes  reducing  inllammation  and  infection  with 
anti-intlanunatory  medications  and  antibiotics,  when  indi- 
cated, or  using  mucoregulatory  medications  that  reduce 
hypersecretion  (which  are  discussed  in  a  subsequent  arti- 
cle in  this  issue  of  RnspiRAroRV  Care;).'- 

Chest  Physical  Therapy 

Airflow-dependent  clearance  can  also  be  increased  by 
moving  secretions  from  the  periphery  of  the  lung  to  more 
proximal  airways,  where  greater  secretion  depth  and  higher 
expiratory  air  tlow  can  improve  expectoration.  This  is  why 
cough  is  generally  incorporated  into  most  chest  physical 
therapy  (CPT)  maneuvers." 

CPT  includes  the  application  of  directed  cough,  forced 
expiratory  techniques,  postural  drainage,  chest  percussion, 
clapping,  vibration,  high-frequency  oscillation,  and  breath- 
ing exercises.  Mucus  transport  by  expiratory  air  tlow  (in- 
cluding cough)  is  the  primary  transport  mechanism  in  pa- 
tients with  pulmonary  diseases  when  mucociliary  transport 
is  damaged.'^  Cough  transport  is  dependent  on  airflow 
velocity,  especially  peak  expiratory  flow,  which  facilitates 
mucus  detachment  from  the  epithelium.  The  mucociliary 
and  mucus-epithelial  interaction  is  most  pronounced  at  the 
interface  between  the  2  surfaces.  Detachment  can  be  af- 
fected either  by  airflow  forces  or  by  application  of  phys- 
ical therapy  techniques  such  as  chest  percussion.  Once  a 
critical  air  tlow  is  reached  (detachment  velocity)  there  is 
marked  improvement  in  mucus  clearance  and  ciliary  effi- 
cacy. 

CPT  combined  with  vigorous,  directed  cough  is  effec- 
tive in  clearing  the  airways  of  retained  secretions."  Evi- 
dence from  studies  using  inhaled  radioaerosol  techniques 
show  that  cough  alone  and  cough  combined  w  ith  CPT  are 
equivalent  in  promoting  central  airway  mucus  clearance, 
whereas  combined  techniques  are  better  for  accelerating 
clearance  from  the  small  airways.''' 

High  expiratory  air  flow  (mucus  shearing  forces)  de- 
pends on  generation  of  large  positive  intrapleural  pressure, 
best  achieved  at  high  lung  volumes.  High  expiratory  tlow 
can  be  achieved  by  a  forced  expiration,  and  this  appears  to 
be  most  efficacious  in  patients  with  opimiallv  treated  air- 
tlow  obstruction.  Dynamic  compression  of  the  airways 
lakes  place  during  a  forced  expiration  upwards  from  the 
airway  equal  pressure  point.  The  location  and  magnitude 
of  the  compression  can  be  varied  by  expiration  force  (in- 
trapleural pressure)  and  lung  volume  (elastic  recoil  pres- 
sure)." For  these  reasons,  breathing  exercises  are  often 
combined  with  CPT. 


766 


Rhsi^irator'i  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Physiology  oi-  Airway  Mucus  Clearance 


Addition  ot  percussion  to  ct)n\cntional  physiotherapy 
has  not,  in  most  studies,  improved  sputum  yield  or  muco- 
ciliary clearance,  except  possibly  for  CF  patients.  Postural 
(gravity  assisted)  drainage,  as  distinct  from  chest  percus- 
sion, adds  little  to  the  effectiveness  of  chest  percussion  and 
increases  the  risk  of  aspiration  from  increased  gastroesoph- 
ageal reflux.'^ 

Summary 

Understanding  the  physiology  of  mucus  secretion  and 
clearance  cannot  only  improve  our  ability  to  evaluate  the 
effectiveness  of  therapeutic  interventions;  it  enhances  our 
ability  to  target  medications  and  airway  clearance  tech- 
niques to  patients  most  likely  to  benefit. 


REFERENCES 

1.  Blake  JR.  Winet  H.  On  the  mechanics  of  mucociliary  transport. 
Biorheology  IMSO; 1 7(1-2):  125-1. M. 

2.  Lopez-Vidriero  MT.  Airway  mucus:  production  and  composition. 
Chest  1981:80(6  Suppl):799-804. 

3.  Aikawa  T.  Shimura  S.  Sasaki  H.  Takishima  T,  Yaegashi  H.  Taka- 
hashi  T.  Morphometric  analysis  of  intraluminal  mucus  in  airways  in 
chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease.  .Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  1989: 
140(2):477-482. 

4.  Morgenroth  K.  Bolz  J.  Morphological  features  of  the  interaction 
between  mucus  and  surfactant  on  the  bronchial  mucosa.  Respiration 
1985;47(3):22.V23I. 

5.  King  M.  Rubin  BK.  Mucus  physiology  and  pathophysiology:  ther- 
apeutic aspects.  In:  Derenne  JP.  Similowski  T.  Whitelaw  WA.  edi- 
tors. Chronic  obstructive  lung  disease.  New  York:  Marcel  Dekker: 
I996:,391-411. 

6.  Boucher  RC.  Human  airway  ion  transport.  Parts  one  and  two.  Am  J 
Respir  Cnt  Care  Med  1994:150(  1  ):271-281  and  I994;I50(2):581- 
593. 

7.  Zayas  JG.  Rubin  BK.  York  E.  Lien  DC.  King  M.  Bronchial  mucus 
properties  in  lung  cancer:  relationship  with  site  of  lesion.  Can  Resp 
J  1999:6(3):246-252. 

8.  Rubin  BK.  Ramirez  O,  Zayas  JG.  Finegan  B,  King  M.  Collection  and 
analysis  of  respiratory  mucus  from  subjects  without  lung  disease. 
Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  1990:141(4  Pt  I):1040-1043. 

9.  van  As  A.  Regional  variations  of  mucus  clearance  in  normal  and  in 
bronchitic  mammalian  airways.  Adv  Exp  Med  Biol  1982:144:417- 
418. 

10.  Tomkiewicz  RP.  Albers  GM,  De  Sanctis  GT.  Ramirez  OE.  King  M. 
Rubin  BK.  Species  differences  in  the  physical  and  transport  proper- 
ties of  airway  secretions.  Can  J  Physiol  Pharmacol  1995:73(21:165- 
171. 

1 1.  Wanner  A.  Salathe  M.  O'Riordan  TG.  Mucociliary  clearance  in  the 
airways.  Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  1996:154(6  Pt  1  ):1868-1902. 

12.  Rose  MC.  Gendler  SJ.  Airway  mucin  genes  and  gene  products.  In: 
Rogers  DF,  Lethem  MI.  editors.  Airway  mucus:  basic  mechanisms 
and  clinical  perspectives.  Basel:  Birkhauser:  1997:41-66. 

13.  Zahm  JM.  Pierrot  D.  Vaquez-Girod  S.  DuvivierC.  King  M.  Puchelle 
E.  The  role  of  mucus  sol  phase  in  clearance  by  simulated  cough. 
Biorheology  1989:26(4):747-752. 


14.  Govindaraju  K.  Cowley  EA.  Eidelmaii  1)11,  l.loyd  FJK.  Analysis  of 
proteins  in  micro  samples  of  rat  aiiway  surface  lluid  by  capillary 
electrophoresis.  J  Chromatography  Biomed  Sci  Applic  1998:705(2): 
22.V230. 

15.  Bennett  WD.  Foster  WM.  Chapman  WF.  Cough-enhanced  mucus 
clearance  in  the  normal  lung.  J  AppI  Physiol  I990;69(5):I670-I675. 

16.  King  M.  Rheological  requirements  for  optimal  clearance  of  secre- 
tions: ciliary  transport  versus  cough.  Eur  J  Respir  Dis  SuppI  1980: 
ll0:.19-45. 

1 7.  Puchelle  E,  Zahm  JM,  Gir;ird  F,  Bertrand  A,  Polu  JM,  Aug  F,  Sadoul  P. 
Muc(x;iliary  transport  in  vivo  and  m  vitro:  relations  to  sputum  properties 
in  chronic  bronchitis.  Eur  J  Respir  Dis  1980;61(5):2.54-264. 

18.  Tomkiewicz  RP,  Kishioka  C,  Freeman  J,  Rubin  BK.  DNA  and  actin 
filament  ultrastructure  in  cystic  fibrosis  sputum.  In:  Baum  G,  editor. 
Cilia,  mucus  and  mucociliary  interactions.  New  York:  Marcel  Dek- 
ker: I998:333-.341. 

19.  Katz  I.  Zwas  T,  Baum  GL,  Aharonson  E,  Belfer  B.  Ciliary  beat 
frequency  and  mucociliary  clearance.  What  is  the  relationship?  Chest 
1987,92(3):491^93. 

20.  Turner  JAP,  Corkey  CWB,  Lee  JYC,  Levison  H,  Sturgess  J,  Clinical 
expressions  of  immotile  cilia  syndrome.  Pediatrics  I98l;67(6):805- 
810. 

21.  Afzelius  BA.  A  human  syndrome  caused  by  immotile  cilia.  .Science 
1976:I93(4250):317-3I9. 

22.  Kartagener  M.  Zur  Patholodie  der  bronchiektasien:  bronchiektasien 
bei  situs  viscerum  invertus,  Beitr  Klin  Tuberk  1933:83:489-501. 

23.  Rubin  BK.  Immotile  cilia  syndrome  (primary  ciliary  dyskinesia)  and 
inflammatory  lung  disease.  Clin  Chest  Med  l988;9(4):657-668. 

24.  Rubin  BK.  Surface  properties  of  respiratory  secretions:  relationship 
to  mucus  transport.  In:  Baum  G,  editor.  Cilia,  mucus,  and  mucocili- 
ary interactions.  New  York:  Marcel  Dekker,  1998:317-324. 

25.  Hite  RD.  Seeds  MC,  Jacinto  RB,  Balasubramanian  R.  Waite  M,  Bass 
D.  Hydrolysis  of  surfactant-associated  phosphotidylcholine  by  mam- 
malian secretory  phospholipases  A2.  Am  J  Physiol  1998:275(4  Pt 
I):L740-L747. 

26.  Girod  S,  Galabert  C,  Lecuire  A,  Zahm  JM,  Puchelle  E.  Phospholipid 
composition  and  surface-active  properties  of  tracheobronchial  secre- 
tions from  patients  with  cystic  Fibrosis  and  chronic  obstructive  pul- 
monary diseases.  Pediatr  Pulmon  1992:13(  I  ):22-27. 

27.  Anzueto  A.  Jubran  A,  Char  JA,  Piquette  CA,  Rennard  SI,  Colice  G, 
et  al.  Effects  of  aerosolized  surfactant  in  patients  with  stable  chronic 
bronchitis:  a  prospective  randomized  controlled  trial.  J  Am  Med 
Assoc  1997:278(17):I426-1431. 

28.  King  M.  Mucus,  mucociliary  clearance  and  coughing.  In:  Bates  DV. 
Respiratory  function  in  disease,  3rd  ed.  Philadelphia:  Saunders,  1989: 
69-78. 

29.  King  M,  Zahm  JM,  Pierrot  D,  Vaquez-Girod  S,  Puchelle  E.  The  role 
of  mucus  gel  viscosity,  spinnability.  and  adhesive  properties  in  clear- 
ance by  simulated  cough.  Biorheology  1989:26(4):737-745, 

30.  King  M.  Role  of  mucus  viscoelaslicity  in  cough  clearance.  Biorheo- 
logy 1987:24(6):589-.597. 

31.  Kishioka  C,  Okamoto  K,  Kim  JS,  Rubin  BK.  Regulation  of  secretion 
from  mucous  and  serous  cells  in  the  excised  ferret  trachea.  Respir 
Physiol  2001:126(2):  163-171. 

32.  Rubin  BK.  The  pharmacologic  approach  to  airway  clearance:  mu- 
coactive  agents.  Respir  Care  2002:47(7 ):8 1 8-822. 

33.  van  der  Schans  CP,  Postma  DS.  Koeter  GH,  Rubin  BK,  Physiother- 
apy and  bronchial  mucus  transport.  Eur  Respir  J  I999:I3(6):1477- 
1486. 

M.  Kim  CS,  Rodriguez  CR,  Eldridge  MA.  Sackner  MA.  Criteria  for 
mucus  transport  in  the  airways  by  two-phase  gas-liquid  flow  mech- 
anism. J  AppI  Physiol  1986:60(3):90I-907, 

35.  van  der  Schans  CP,  Piers  DA,  Postma  DS.  Effect  of  manual  percus 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


767 


Phvsioi  (KiY  oi-  Airway  Mucus  Clearance 


sion  on  trachciibronchial  clearance  In  patients  with  chronic  airtlou 
obstruction  and  excessive  tracheobronchial  secretion.  Thorax  1986; 
4l(ft):44X-452. 
36.  van  Hengstum  M,  Festen  J.  Beurskcns  C.  Hankcl  M.  Beeknian  F. 
Corstens  P.  Conventional  physiotherapy  and  forced  expiration  ma- 
noeuvres have  similar  effects  on  tracheobronchial  clearance.  Fur 
Respir  J  |y88;l(8):758-76l. 


M. 


3X. 


van  der  Schans  CP.  Piers  DA.  Beekhuis  H.  Koeter  GH,  van  der  Mark 
TW.  Postnia  DS.  Effect  of  forced  expirations  on  mucus  clearance  in 
patients  with  chronic  airllow  obstruction:  effect  of  lung  recoil  pres- 
sure. Thorax  iyy():4.'i«8):623-6:7. 

Vandenplas  Y.  Diericx  A.  Blecker  U.  Lanciers  S.  Deneyer  M.  Esoph- 
ageal pH  monitoring  data  during  chest  physiotherapy.  J  Pediatr  Gas- 
troenterol Nutr  l99l;l3(l):23-26. 


Courtesv  Health  Sciences  Libraries.  Universitv  of  Washington 


768 


Respiratory  Carl  •  Jll^  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Positioning  Versus  Postural  Drainage 


James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FAARC 


Introduction 

(iravity 

Posture  iuid  Turning 

Postural  Drainajje 
Practice  to  Evidence 
Postural  Drainage  Procedure 

External  Manipulation  ot  the  Thorax 

Contraindications  for  Postural  Drainage 

Hazards/Complications 

Role  of  Exercise 

Summary 


For  the  past  70  years  positioning  and  postural  drainage  have  played  an  important  role  in  increasing 
lung  \  olumes.  perfusion,  oxygenation  and  mobilization  of  secretions.  While  gravity  is  not  a  primary 
mechanism  for  normal  secretion  clearance,  it  plays  a  major  role  in  depth  and  pattern  of  ventilation, 
perfusion,  and  lymphatic  drainage.  Changing  patient  position,  or  turning  patients  on  a  regular 
basis,  is  a  powerful  tool  in  maintaining  lung  health  in  a  broad  range  of  patients.  In  contrast, 
postural  drainage  requires  considerable  investment  of  time,  and  has  been  shown  to  have  limited 
benefit  in  most  patients.  Postural  drainage  has  been  shown  to  improve  mobilization  of  secretions  in 
patients  with  cystic  fibrosis  as  well  as  patients  who  produce,  and  have  difficulty  clearing,  large 
quantities  of  sputum.  The  benefits  of  postural  drainage  appear  technique-dependent,  requiring 
sufficient  drainage  time  (3  -  15  mini  for  each  position  drained.  The  evidence  does  not  support  the 
use  of  vibration  and  percussion  independent  of  active  postural  drainage.  Exercise  (tffers  benefit 
in  secretion  clearance,  which  increases  when  combined  with  a  program  of  postural  drainage.  In 
conclusion,  routine  turning,  mobilization  and  exercise  is  important  to  maintain  lung  health  in 
all  patients,  while  postural  drainage,  properly  applied,  has  been  shown  to  improve  secretion 
clearance  in  a  relatively  narrow  range  of  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis  and  excessive  sputum 
production.  Key  Words:,  po.stural  drainage,  secreliiui  clearance,  chest  physical  therapy,  cystic 
fibrosis.     IRcspirCare  2()()2;47(7):769-777] 


Introduction 

Since  the  193()s.  clinicians  have  used  gravity  (by  turn- 
ins:  the  patient)  to  increase  lung  volumes  and  oxygenation 


James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FAARC  is  FclUm   in   Respiralory  Science, 
Aerogen  Incorporated.  Mountain  View.  California 
Mr  Fink  presented  a  version  ol  ttiis  repori  al  llie   I7tti  Annual  New 
Horizons  Symposium  at  the  47tli  International  Respiratory  Congress.  San 
Antonio.  Texas.  December  14.  2(M)1. 

Correspondence:  James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FAARC.  Aerogen  Incorpo- 
rated. 2071  Stierlin  Court.  Mountain  View  CA  94043.  E-mail: 
jfink@aerogen.com. 


and  to  help  mobilize  secretions  (via  postural  drainage). 
Low  lung  volume,  ineffective  cough,  ventilation/perfusion 
mismatch,  and  thick  secretions  are  commonly  associated 
with  pulmonary  complications.'  Though  postural  drainage 
has  become  synonymous  with  secretion  clearance  in  pa- 
tients who  have  large  volumes  of  secretions,  there  is  a 
greater  body  of  evidence  supporting  the  therapeutic  impli- 
cations of  mobilization  and  patient  positioning  for  a  broader 
patient  population.'  This  became  evident  to  the  team 
charged  to  develop  the  American  Association  for  Respi- 
ratory Care's  Clinical  Practice  Guideline  on  Postural  Drain- 
age. Consequently,  that  documcni  expanded  its  scope  be- 
yond postural  drainage,  to  include  the  therapeutic  impact 


RiiSPiRATORY  Cari-;  •  Jii.^-  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


769 


Positioning  Versus  Postural  Drainage 


Fig.  1.  Changes  in  perfusion  with  position  change.  (From  Refer- 
ence 1 ,  with  permission.) 


of  positioning.''  In  this  paper  I  explore  tlie  practice  of  and 
the  rationale  and  evidence  for  positioning  and  postural 
drainage  in  secretion  clearance. 

Gravity 

Though  postural  drainage  has  been  shown  to  be  of  clin- 
ical benefit  for  selected  patients  under  very  specific  cir- 
cumstances, gravity  is  not  a  primary  mechanism  for  nor- 
mal mucus  transport  in  the  lung.  On  the  contrary,  the 
viscosity  of  the  normal  mucus  blanket  is  such  that  it  does 
not  typically  flow  into  gravity-dependent  terminal  airways.-* 

Gravity  has  a  key  role  in  maintaining  lung  health,  with 
body  position  impacting  depth  and  patterns  of  ventilation. 
perfusion,  and  lymphatic  drainage,  each  of  which  impact 
the  ability  to  effectively  clear  secretions  from  the  lung  and 
improve  oxygenation.  Consequently,  mobilizing  and  reg- 
ularly changing  the  patient's  position  has  long  been  ac- 
cepted as  key  in  management  and  support  of  the  airway  of 
the  acutely  and  critically  ill  patient. 

In  healthy  lung  tissue,  ventilation  is  greater  in  gravity- 
dependent  areas,  with  smaller  aheoli  being  more  compli- 
ant than  larger  ones.  Pulmonary  blood  flow  and  lymphatic 
circulation  are  relatively  low-pressure  systems  that  are 
greatly  affected  by  gravity,  so  body  position  affects  the 
distribution  of  both  blood  and  lymphatic  fluids  (Fig.  1;. 

Posture  and  Turning 

Turning  the  patient  from  supine  to  lateral  or  prone  po- 
sition (Fig.  2)  results  in  a  net  increase  in  lung  volumes 
(functional  residual  capacity)  and  improved  oxygenation.^ 
As  the  patient  is  turned,  the  weight  of  the  mediastinum, 
lung  tissue,  and  abdominal  contents  tends  to  compress  the 
gravity-dependent  lung,  while  the  superior  lung  is  pulled 
open  to  a  larger  volume,  resulting  in  a  net  increase  in  lung 
volume.  When  areas  of  atelectatic  lung  are  mo\ed  to  su- 
perior position,  the  weight  of  the  mediastinum  and  lung 
pulls  on  elastic  tissue  in  the  lung,  expanding  the  airways 
and  alveoli.  As  the  patient  is  turned,  blood,  lymphatic 
fluid,  and  extravascular  water  migrate  to  gra\ity-depen- 
dent  areas  of  the  lung.  Consequently,  in  the  superior  lung 


Fig.  2.  Common  patient  positions.  A.  Supine.  B.  Prone.  C.  Fowl- 
er's. D.  Semi-Fowler's.  E.  Side-lying.  F.  Supported  prone.  (From 
Reference  1 ,  with  permission.) 

there  is  reduced  perfusion,  increased  forces  expanding  the 
airway,  and  reduced  tidal  \entilation  secondary  to  the  in- 
creased size  of  the  airways.  The  strategy  of  placing  the 
good  lung  dow  11  promotes  good  ventilation  matching  areas 
ot  perfusion,  w  hile  the  superior  lung  is  expanded  and  per- 
fusion is  reduced. 


770 


Ri-spiRATORY  Care  •  Jul^'  2(X)2  Vol  47  No  7 


PosmoNiNCi  Vi;rsus  Postiirai  Drainagh 


01 

E 

o 
> 


7.00  n 


6.00 


5  00 


4,00 


3.00 


2.00  - 


1  00  - 


0.00 


Sitting 


Standing 


inspiratory 
Capacity 


Expiratory 

Reserve 

Volume 


Residual 
Volume 


Supine 


Right  Lateral       Left  Lateral      Trendelenburg 


Fig.  3.  Changes  in  lung  volumes  with  position.  Top  row  of  bars  represents  inspiratory  capacity.  Middle  row  of  bars  represents  expiratory 
reserve  volume.  Bottom  row  of  bars  represents  residual  volume.  Function  residual  capacity  (expiratory  reserve  volume  plus  residual  volume) 
IS  reduced  in  the  supine  position,  with  net  increases  in  either  lateral  position.  Note  further  reduction  in  functional  residual  capacity  in 
Trendelenburg  position.  (From  Reference  1 .  with  permission.) 


Douglas  et  al  demonstrated  that  the  supported  prone 
position  (supporting  the  patient  at  the  hips  and  chest,  al- 
lowing the  abdominal  contents  to  hang  freely)  results  in 
larger  lung  volumes,  with  blood  oxygen  saturation  im- 
provement similar  to  that  obtained  with  application  of  con- 
tinuous positive  airway  pressure  in  chronic  obstructive  pul- 
monary disease  patients  in  acute  respiratory  failure.'' 
Consequently,  use  of  the  prone  position,  even  without  sup- 
port, has  been  shown  to  offer  important  benefits  in  oxy- 
genation (Fig.  3).''-'^ 

In  critical  care  and  postoperative  situations,  where  atel- 
ectasis is  a  major  complication,  factors  such  as  pain  and 
the  risk  of  dislodging  tubes,  monitor  leads,  and  lines  make 
it  very  tempting  to  leave  the  patient  supine  for  a  prolonged 
period.  However,  the  longer  a  patient  remains  supine  the 
greater  the  chance  that  lung  volumes  will  be  reduced  and 
that  secretions,  aspirated  gastric  contents,  and  extravascu- 
lar  interstitial  fluids  will  pool  in  gravity-dependent  areas.'" 

Turning  the  patient  is  a  primary  technique  for  lung  ex- 
pansion. Patients  should  be  encouraged  to  turn,  or  be  turned, 
at  least  every  2  hours,  while  awake.  Early  mobilization  of 
patients  (who  can  safely  get  out  of  bed)  is  a  superb  exam- 
ple of  optimal  lung  expansion  therapy,  with  minimal  ad- 
ditional cost.' 

Just  as  changes  in  body  position  can  improve  the  match- 
ing of  ventilation  with  perfusion  in  the  dependent  lung. 
turning  can  have  deleterious  effects,  so  each  change  in 
position  should  be  evaluated  for  patient  tolerance.  When 
the  less-healthy  lung  is  in  the  dependent  position,  areas  of 
decrea.sed  \entilation  ha\e  increased  perfusion,  resulting 


in  poor  oxygenation  and  potential  heinodynamic  instabil- 
ity. When  turning  unstable  or  critically  ill  patients,  oxygen 
saturation,  dyspnea,  and  blood  pressure  should  be  moni- 
tored to  determine  patient  respon.se  and  tolerance. 

In  unilateral  lung  disease,  placing  the  healthier  lung 
down  initially  improves  oxygenation.  However,  over  time 
the  gravity-dependent  intercellular  fluids,  lymphatic  flu- 
ids, and  secretions  migrate,  transforming  the  healthier  lung 
into  the  less-healthy  lung.  Consequently,  turning  the  pa- 
tient every  I  or  2  hours,  so  that  the  less-healthy  lung  is 
down,  even  for  short  periods,  will  help  to  maintain  the 
integrity  of  the  good  lung. 

Rotating  beds  that  continuously  turn  the  patient  from 
side  to  side  are  associated  with  fewer  pulmonary  compli- 
cations and  a  lower  incidence  of  pulled  and  disconnected 
lines.  Though  the  studies  have  been  encouraging,  more 
randoiTiized  controlled  studies  are  necessary  to  determine 
whether  these  expensive  support  devices  are  better  overall 
than  the  standard  practice  of  periodically  turning  the  patient. 

Postural  Drainage 
F'ractice  to  F3\idt'nce 

In  a  recent  reviev\  of  the  evidence  supporting  the  prac- 
tice of  secretion  clearance  techniques.  Hess  reported  a 
dearth  of  high-level  evidence  to  support  any  secretion  clear- 
ance technique.'"  A  brief  history  of  postural  drainage  may 
offer  some  insights  as  to  how  early  anecdotal  observations 


Respiratory  Carii  •  Jt  ly  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


771 


Positioning  Versus  Pcxsturak  Drainage 


have  led  to  therapeutic  interventions  that  represent  a  sub- 
stantial component  of  respiratory  care  practice. 

The  practice  of  postural  drainage  began  with  the  treat- 
ment of  surgical  patients,  prior  to  the  availability  of  anti- 
biotics. Bronchiectasis  was  a  common  disease,  and  when 
patients  with  bronchiectasis  required  lung  resection  to  treat 
tuberculosis,  surgeons  observed  thick  secretions  infiltrat- 
ing the  fresh  incisions  and  a  high  incidence  of  postopera- 
tive complications.  Tipping  was  used  to  drain  secretions 
from  the  bronchiectatic  airways  adjacent  to  the  resected 
area  and  was  associated  with  fewer  postoperative  infec- 
tions. 

The  earliest  text  I  am  aware  of  on  postural  drainage  was 
published  in  1956.  It  is  a  63-page  monograph  by  E  Wini- 
fred Thacker,  Superintendent  Physiotherapist,  at  Harefield 
Hospital,  United  Kingdom,  entitled  Postural  Drainage  and 
Respiratory  Control."  which  identified  many  of  the  ra- 
tionales for  and  practical  limitations  of  chest  physical  ther- 
apy (CPT),  as  shown  in  the  following  excerpts: 

Postural  drainage  must  be  regarded  as  a  period  of 
concentrated  coughing  and  basal  breathing,  during 
which  time  every  effort  is  made  to  clear  the  lungs  of 
secretions.  To  achieve  this,  determined  enthusiasm 
on  the  part  of  the  therapist  as  well  as  accurate  pos- 
turing, good  diaphragmatic  breathing  and  correct 
coughing  will  produce  the  best  results. 


Thus,  breathing  exercises  and  controlled  cough  are  in- 
tegral with  postural  drainage. 

To  those  who  do  not  appreciate  the  necessity  of 
postural  drainage  in  the  presence  of  lung  suppura- 
tion we  give  the  following  analogy.  The  infected 
area  is  like  a  narrow  necked  bottle  filled  w  ith  thick 
oil.  The  ordinary  cough  resembles  hitting  the  base 
of  the  bottle  and  jerking  some  of  the  oil  out.  The 
answer  is  to  invert  the  bottle  and  leave  it  with  the 
neck  hanging  down:  this  can  only  be  done  if  the 
bottle  is  placed  in  the  proper  position.  A  further  aid 
to  ejection  is  concentrated  localized  breathing  ex- 
ercises, particularly  if  carried  out  during  postural 
drainage. 


That  analogy  was  later  corrupted  into  the  "ketchup  bot- 
tle analogy"  of  hitting  the  bottle  to  mobilize  the  contents. 
But,  on  the  contrary,  the  key  concepts  of  postural  drainage 
are  posture,  time.  hreathinK.  and  cough:  percussion  and 
vibration  are  only  minor  components  of  the  therapy. 

Ideally  patients  w  ith  a  quantity  of  sputum  should  tip 
4  times  daily  for  al  least  half  an  hour  at  each  ses- 
sion, or  an  hour  if  there  are  2  or  more  areas  to  drain. 


Based  on  this  seminal  text,  treatment  was  typically  1  or 
2  positions  per  session,  lasting  from  30-60  min.  Over  the 
years,  many  institutions  have  redefined  CPT  to  include  up 
to  12  positions,  for  as  little  as  15  min,  v\ith  no  e\idcnce  to 
sujiport  the  change  in  practice. 

Too  often  it  is  found  that  ""postural  drainage"'  con- 
sists only  of  raising  the  foot  of  the  bed  or  tipping 
the  patient  once  or  twice  a  day.  .  .  posture  must  be 
used  over  prolonged  periods. 


Similarly,  many  clinicians  have  substituted  percussion 
and  vibration  for  proper  positioning  and  appropriate  drain- 
age times. 

Forty  years  later,  there  has  been  little  high-level  evi- 
dence introduced  to  support  the  clinical  benefit  of  postural 
drainage  and  the  evolution  of  practice  and  clinical  appli- 
cations from  that  first  early  monograph. 

Postural  drainage  is  the  gold  standard  to  which  all  other 
bronchial  hygiene  techniques  are  compared.  Although  tech- 
niques such  as  directed  cough,  active  cycle  of  breathing, 
forced  expiratory  technique,  positive  airway  pressure,  and 
high-frequency  oscillation  of  the  airway  and  chest  wall 
more  directly  support  normal  mucus  transport  mechanisms 
than  does  postural  drainage,  they  have,  at  best,  equivalent 
efficacy. 

Thomas  et  al  conducted  a  meta-analysis'-  of  the  effi- 
cacy of  physical  therapy  modalities  (eg,  positive  expira- 
tory pressure,  forced  expiratory  technique,  exercise,  auto- 
genic drainage,  and  standard  CPT)  for  clearing  bronchial 
secretions  with  cystic  fibrosis  patients.  They  reviewed  456 
citations  from  1966  to  1993.  which  yielded  35  trials  that 
met  inclusion  criteria.  Standard  physical  therapy  (postural 
drainage  with  percussion  and  vibration)  resulted  in  signif- 
icantly greater  expectoration  than  no  treatment  (effect  size 
of  0.61  SD  units,  p  <  0.0001).  CPT  with  exercise  was 
associated  with  better  FEV,  than  CPT  alone  (p  =  0.04). 
They  found  no  other  differences  between  physical  therapy 
modalities.  The  majority  of  studies  suffered  from  small 
sample  size,  short  duration,  and  inadequate  descriptions  of 
the  treatments  being  tested.  In  addition,  the  end  points  are 
all  too  often  indirect  surrogates  for  improved  airway  clear- 
ance. The  3  rnost  common  variables  measured  have  been 
changes  in  pulmonary  function,  clearance  of  radiolabeled 
aerosol,  and  volume  of  sputum.  In  the  long  run.  the  vol- 
ume of  sputum  is  among  the  easiest  to  perform  and  the 
least  meaningful.  Quantitation  of  difficulty  in  expectora- 
tion (eg.  with  a  visual  analog  scale)  has  substantial  impli- 
cations tor  patient  quality  of  life.  Other  important  vari- 
ables include  number  of  missed  days  of  work  or  school, 
frequency  of  exacerbations  (as  evidenced  by  number  of 
emergency  visits),  hospital  admissions,  and  hospital  length 
of  stay. 


772 


RESPikAroRY  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Positioning  Vi;rsiis  Postural  Drainagh 


Fig.  4.  Common  positions  for  chest  physiotherapy.  Drainage  for  (A)  anterior  segments  of  upper  lobes.  (B)  superior  and  inferior  segments 
of  lingula.  (C)  anterior  basal  segment  of  lower  lobe,  (D)  lateral  basal  segment  of  lower  lobe,  (E)  superior  segment  of  lower  lobe,  (F)  posterior 
basal  segments  of  lower  lobes,  (G)  lateral  and  medial  segments  of  right  middle  lobe,  (H)  apical  segment  of  upper  lobe,  (I)  posterior  segment 
of  upper  lobe.  (From  Reference  2,  with  permission.) 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


773 


Positioning  Versus  Postukai.  Drainage 


Table  1.      Proucdurc  lor  Posilioning 


Turning  (Repositioning j/Mobility 

1.  Explain  lo  the  patient  that  the  reason  lor  Ireiiiient  position 
changes  and  niohility  is  lo  promote  lung  expansion  anj  to 
improve  blood  oxygenation. 

2.  Encourage  the  patient  lo  turn  independently  and/or  assist  him  or 
her  to  change  position  as  necessary.  Optimal  positions  for  lung 
expansion  and  secretion  mobilization  are  oblique  side-lying  with 
the  bed  at  any  degree  of  inclination  as  tolerated  by  the  patient, 
and  prone.  Sitting,  dangling  at  the  bedside,  and  ambulation  are 
also  effective  in  promoting  lung  expansion  and  secretion 
mobilization. 

3.  Repositioning  frequency  is  determined  in  part  by  assessment  of 
tissue  tolerance.  The  reddened  area  marking  the  points  of  pressure 
should  disappear  within  30  min  after  the  patient  is  repositioned.  If 
the  reddened  area  remains  longer  than  30  min  the  turning  frequency 
should  be  increased  and/or  the  support  suiface  changed. 

4.  Pillows  and  other  positioning  devices  should  be  used  to  keep 
bony  prominences  from  direct  contact  with  one  another  and  to 
prop  up  or  help  support  the  patient  in  the  desired  position. 

5.  With  each  change  in  position,  assess  the  patient  for  increased 
dyspnea,  decreased  oxygen  .saturation,  and  discomfort. 

6.  Even  when  positions  are  poorly  tolerated,  position  changes  for  as 
little  as  5  min  serve  to  promote  redistribution  of  ventilation, 
blood  perfusion,  and  lymphatic  How. 

7.  Document  patient  response  in  the  patient  record. 


^■Ui»'  — 


Fig.  5.  Percussion  devices  and  techniques.  A.  Manual  clapping.  B. 
Manual  clapping  devices.  C.  Mechanical  percussor.  (From  Refer- 
ence 1,  with  permission.) 


Table  2.       Procedure  for  Postural  Drainage 


Equipment 

•  Bed  or  table  that  can  assume  a  range  ol  positions,  from 
Trendelenburg  to  reverse  Trendelenburg  position 

•  Pillows  for  supporting  patient  while  in  position 

•  Light  towel  for  covering  area  of  chest  during  percussion 

•  Tissues  and/or  basin  for  collecting  expectorated  sputum 

•  Suction  equipment  for  patients  unable  to  clear  own  secretions 

•  Gloves,  goggles,  gown,  and  mask 

•  Optional;  hand-held  or  mechanical  percussor  or  vibrator 

1.  Instruct  patient  that  postural  drainage  therapy  is  used  to  mobilize 
secretions  and  that  regular  use  can  reduce  deterioration  of  lung 
function  and  acute  exacerbations.  Patients  should  also  be  taught  to 
perform  active  cycle  of  breathing  technique  and  huff. 

Instruct  the  patient  to: 

(a)  Assume  each  position  with  niininium  ol  discomlort.  and  to 
maintain  each  position  for  ?-IO  mm. 

(b)  Take  slow  deep  breaths  and  to  use  thoracic  expansion,  forced 
expirations,  and  huff  in  each  position. 

(c)  While  draining  a  position,  percussion  or  vibration  may  be 
applied  over  the  affected  area  of  the  lung.  Manual  vibration 
may  be  applied  on  exhalation. 

2.  Modify  positions  to  optimize  patient  tolerance  and  comfort  (ie. 
reduce  angle  of  head-down  lilt  while  draining  posterior  basal 
segments). 

3.  Evaluate  the  patient  or  caregiver  for  his  or  her  ability  lo  self- 
adininister.  Observe  patient  self-administer  on  several  occasions  to 
assure  proper  uncoached  technique  prior  lo  allowing  patient  to  sell- 
administer  without  supervision. 


Though  most  protocols  are  compared  against  standard 
postural  drainage  therapy,  it  is  clear  that  inost  of  the  avail- 
able alternatives  are  comparable  in  terms  of  benetlt  to  the 
patient.  The  question  appears  to  be  less  one  of  "will  it 
work?"  than  "will  the  patient  use  it?"  If  the  patient  per- 
ceives benefit,  then  the  chance  of  adherence  is  greatly 
increased  (Table  I ). 


Fig.  6.  Manual  vibration  technique.  (From  Reference  40,  with  per- 
mission.) 


774 


RispiR  ATORY  Care  •  ivL\  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


PosirioNiNCi  Vi:rsus  Postural  Drainage 


Postural  Drainase  Procedure 

Posiuial  drainage  consists  of  positioning  the  patient  so 
that  secretions  u  ill  drain  from  specific  segments  and  lohes 
of  the  lung  tow  ard  grav  ity-dependent  central  airways,  u  here 
they  can  be  more  readily  removed  with  cough  or  mechan- 
ical aspiration.  This  is  accomplished  by  positioning  the 
patient  so  that  the  affected  segments  of  the  lung  are  supe- 
rior to  the  carina,  with  each  position  maintained  for  at  least 
3-15  min.  Nine  to  12  positions  are  needed  to  drain  all 
areas  of  the  lungs,  requiring  at  least  1  hour  for  a  complete 
session  (Fig.  4  and  Table  2).-' 

There  is  evidence  that  postural  drainage  is  effective  in 
treating  acute  and  stable  cystic  fibrosis,  bronchiectasis, 
and  other  conditions  characterized  by  mucus  hypersecre- 
tion or  difficulty  clearing  secretions."  Postural  drainage 
has  been  found  to  ha\e  little  or  no  effect  in  conditions 
associated  with  scant  secretions  (eg,  viral  pneumonia,  post- 
operative coronary  artery  bypass).  Consequently,  the  indi- 
cations for  postural  drainage  are  largely  limited  to  patients 
with  cystic  fibrosis'-*---  or  bronchiectasis"-^  and  patients 
VK  ho  produce  >  30  mL  of  secretions  per  day  and  who  have 
difficulty  clearing  secretions.--''  Similarly,  studies  in 
which  indi\  idual  positions  were  drained  for  less  than  3-10 
min  ha\ e  shown  no  advantage  over  controls. 

Sputum  production  of  <  25  niL/day  is  insufficient  to 
justify  the  application  of  postural  drainage  thera- 
py 12.20,30.34 -3is  Some  patients  have  productive  coughs,  with 
sputum  production  of  15-30  mL/day  (occasionally  as  high 
as  70-100  mL/day)  without  use  of  postural  drainage.  If 
postural  drainage  does  not  increase  sputum  production  in 
a  patient  who  produces  >  30  mL/day  witht)ut  postural 
drainage,  the  continued  use  of  postural  drainage  is  not 
indicated.  Improved  ease  of  clearing  secretions  during  and 
immediately  after  postural  drainage  supports  continuation 
of  the  therapy. 

External  Manipulation  of  the  Thorax 

Percussion  therapy  (not  to  be  confused  with  high-fre- 
quency oscillation  of  the  chest  wall)  is  a  technique  of 
rapidly  clapping,  cupping,  or  striking  the  external  thorax 
directly  over  the  lung  segment  being  drained.  This  can  be 
accomplished  with  cupped  hands  or  mechanical  devices 
(Fig.  5).  Theoretically,  percussion  assists  secretion  mobi- 
lization by  shaking  the  secretions  loose,  like  shaking 
ketchup  from  a  bottle.  Though  there  is  little  evidence  that 
percussion  improves  mobilization  of  secretions  during  pos- 
tural drainage,  there  is  no  evidence  that  percussion  alone, 
w  ithout  patient  positioning,  is  of  any  \  alue.  Manual  meth- 
ods offer  no  advantage  over  mechanical  meth- 
ods I ''■-IM- '"'-'" 

Vibrating  the  chest  wall  over  the  draining  area,  using 
a  fine  tremorous  action  during  expiration,  has  also  been 


advocated  to  assist  secretion  mobilization  during 
postural  drainage  (Fig.  6).  Evidence  suggesting  that  vi- 
bration for  up  to  an  hour  can  increase  movement  of 
secretions  does  not  support  the  clinical  efficacy  of  this 
procedure. I '•!■'■='•'•*■->'■'■'"•••"  -*■*  Percussion  and  vibration 
appear  to  be  relatively  ineffective-*-  -^^  and  do  not  seem 
to  add  to  the  effectiveness  of  the  combination  of  cough- 
ing, breathing  exercises,  and  postural  drainage, •*■* 
whereas  forced  expiratory  technique,  even  without  pos- 
tural drainage,  enhances  tracheobronchial  clearance. ■•'' 

Unfortunately,  some  clinicians  interpret  an  order  for 
CPT  to  mean  percussion  without  use  of  postural  drainage 
positions.  In  light  of  the  absence  of  evidence  (or  even 
anecdote)  that  percussion  without  positioning  is  of  any 
benefit  to  the  patient,  that  practice  would  seem  to  be  clin- 
ically inappropriate. 

Whether  or  not  vibration  or  percussion  is  effective  for 
mobilization  of  secretions,  the  application  of  these  proce- 
dures as  an  adjunct  to  postural  drainage,  especially  with 
mechanical  vibrators  and  percussors,  often  feels  good  to 
the  patient,  which  is  the  most  convincing  reason  to  con- 
sider applying  the  techniques. 

Contraindications  for  Postural  Drainage 

Head-down  or  Trendelenburg  position  impacts  hemo- 
dynamics and  the  interaction  of  physical  forces  between 
the  thorax  and  the  abdomen.  Trendelenburg  position  should 
be  avoided  in  patients  whose  intracranial  pressure  (eg, 
neurosurgery,  aneurysm,  eye  surgery)  is  elevated  >  20 
mm  Hg-*^  -*'  or  who  have  uncontrolled  hypertension  or  gross 
hemoptysis  related  to  recent  surgery  for  lung  carcinoma  or 
radiation  therapy.^*"  Shifting  of  abdominal  and  thoracic 
contents  with  gravity  in  Trendelenburg  may  be  deleterious 
in  patients  at  risk  for  aspiration  with  uncontrolled  airway, 
distended  abdomen,  or  recent  esophageal  surgery.  Reverse 
Trendelenburg  may  be  hazardous  for  patients  with  hypo- 
tension and  those  receiving  vasoactive  medications. 

Percussion  involves  substantial  risk  but  little  benefit.  It 
is  contraindicated  in  patients  with  suspected  pulmonary 
tuberculosis  or  resectable  tumors  of  the  thorax  or  neck, 
because  the  percussion  might  shake  loose  bacteria  or  can- 
cer cells  that  could  transport  to  other  parts  of  the  body. 
Small  lipomas  and  sebaceous  cysts  are  not  contraindica- 
tions for  percussion.  Percussion  can  increase  wheezing, 
airway  closure,  and  dyspnea.  Lung  contusion  and  coagu- 
lopathies may  be  aggravated  by  percussion.  Relative  con- 
traindications are  osteoporosis  and  osteomyelitis  of  the 
ribs  or  complaints  of  chest  pain.' 

Hazards/Complications 

Postural  drainage  therapy  has  been  associated  with  hy- 
poxemia, bronchospasm.  acute  hypotension,  increased  in- 


Respirator'i-  Care  •  Jll^-  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


775 


PoSITIONINC;  VkRSUS  POSTI'RAI,  DRAINAGE 


tracranial  pressure,  pulmonary  hemorrhage  (hemoptysis), 
pain/injury  to  the  tissue,  and  Nomitins:.  with  risk  of  aspi- 
ration.-'*' To  minimize  risiv  ol  \onnlinij  and  aspiration  for 
patients  receiving  tube  feedings,  slop  feeding  I  hour  prior 
to  and  during  therapy.  Simiiariv.  therapy  should  be  per- 
formed either  before  meals  or  more  than  1  hour  after  meals. 
Bronchodilators  are  commonly  administered  prior  to  pos- 
tural drainage  therapy  to  patients  with  a  history  of  bron- 
chospasm. 

Conditions  that  can  be  exacerbated  by  percussion  or 
vibration  to  the  thorax  include  burns,  open  wounds,  skin 
infections,  recent  skin  grafts,  subcutaneous  emphysema, 
recently  placed  pacemaker,  or  recent  epidural  spinal  infu- 
sion of  anesthesia  of  spinal  type.  Percussion  and  vibration 
are  difficult  for  patients  to  apply  without  assistance. 

Postural  drainage  therapy  is  time-intensive,  requiring 
30-60  min  3-4  times  each  day.  with  special  equipment 
such  as  a  tilt  table.  This  time-commitment  is  a  major  ob- 
stacle to  prescription  adherence  by  the  patient.  Less  ob- 
trusive and  time-consuming  alternative  therapies  would  be 
of  great  value,  if  they  are  clinically  equivalent. 

Role  of  Exercise 

Baldwin  et  aH''  evaluated  the  effect  of  exercise  plus 
CPT  on  sputuiTi  expectoration  and  lung  function  in  8  adult 
subjects  with  cystic  fibrosis.  Exercise  alone  increased  spu- 
tum production  3-fold,  compared  to  rest.  In  a  direct  com- 
parison of  exercise  with  physiotherapy,  Sahl  et  al  showed 
that  exercise  increa.sed  sputum  production,  but  not  as  much 
as  physiotherapy.'^"  Zach  et  al'^'  suggested  that  exercise 
could  be  substituted  for  physiotherapy  without  deteriora- 
tion in  most  patients,  Baldwin  et  aP'*  found  that  exercise  as 
an  adjunct  to  physiotherapy  was  more  effective  than  phys- 
iotherapy alone,  whereas  Bilton  et  al'^-  found  no  differ- 
ence. Exercise  appears  to  augment  bronchial  hygiene  and 
should  be  encouraged,  as  tolerated:  however,  it  should  not 
substitute  for  other  bronchial  hygiene  regimens. 

Summary 

Although  gravity  is  a  minor  factor  in  normal  mobiliza- 
tion of  secretions,  it  has  major  influence  in  factors  such  as 
lung  volumes  and  ventilation  patterns  that  can  impact  cough 
effectiveness  in  a  broad  range  of  acutely  ill  and  bed-ridden 
patients.  These  benefits  can  accrue  with  minimal  effort 
through  routine  turning  and  mobilization  protocols.  Pos- 
tural drainage  has  long  been  considered  the  gold  standard 
for  secretion  clearance,  but  has  only  been  proven  to  benefit 
patients  with  diseases  such  as  CF  and  bronchiectasis.  Tech- 
niques such  as  percussion  and  vibration,  which  appear  to 
be  active,  have  not  been  shown  to  significantly  improve 
secretion  clearance  during  drainage,  and  have  no  evidence 
supporting  their  use  outside  ol  drainage.  In  contrast,  breath- 


ing exercises  and  directed  coughing  are  important  compo- 
nents of  effective  postural  drainage  therapv. 


REFERENCES 

1.  Fink  JB.  Bronchial  liygiene  and  luns;  expansion.  In:  t-ink  JB,  Hunt  J. 
editors.  Clinical  practice  of  respiratory  care,  Philadelphia:  Raven- 
Lippincotl;  1999. 

2.  Fink  JB.  Hess  DR.  Secretion  clearance  techniques.  In:  Hess  DR. 
Maclntyre  NR.  el  al.  editors.  Respiratory  care:  principles  and  prac- 
tices. Philadelphia:  WB  Saunders;  2U02. 

^.  American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care.  AARC  Clinical  Practice 
Guideline:  Postural  drainage  therapy.  Respir  Care  1 99 1  i.'^fti  1 2 1: 1 4 1 8- 
1426. 

4.  Fink  JB.  King  M.  Mechanical  methods  of  mucus  clearance.  In:  Ru- 
bin B.  Van  der  Schans  CP.  editors.  Therapy  for  mucus  clearance 
disorders.  Lung  biology  in  health  and  disease.  New  York:  Marcel 
Dekker  (in  press) 

5.  Miller  RD.  Fowler  WS.  Helmholz  P.  Changes  of  relative  volume  and 
ventilation  of  the  two  lungs  with  changes  to  the  lateral  decubitus 
position.  J  Lab  Clin  Med  1956;47:297-304. 

6.  Douglas  WW.  Rehder  K.  Beynen  FM.  Sessler  AD.  Marsh  HM. 
Improved  oxygenation  in  patients  with  acute  respiratory  failure:  the 
prone  position.  .Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  1977:1 15(4):.s59-.'i66. 

7.  Zack  MB.  Pontoppidan  H.  Kazemi  H.  The  effect  of  lateral  positions 
on  gas  exchange  in  pulmonary  disease:  a  prospective  evaluation,  .Am 
Rev  Respir  Dis  I974;l  10(1  ):49-.55. 

8.  Piehl  MA.  Brown  RS.  Use  of  extreme  position  changes  in  acute 
respiratory  failure.  Crit  Care  Med  I976;4(4):LV14. 

9.  Coonan  TJ.  Hope  CE.  Cardio-respiratory  effects  of  change  of  body 
position.  Can  Anaesth  Soc  J  I98_^;_30(4):424— 1.18. 

10.  Hess  DR.  The  evidence  for  secretion  clearance  technitiues,  Respir 
Care  200 1:461 1 1 1:1276-1 29.1. 

11.  Thacker  EW.  Postural  drainage  and  respiratory  control.  London: 
Lloyd-Luke  Medical  Books  LTD;  I9.';6. 

12.  Thomas  J.  Cook  DJ.  Brooks  D.  Chest  physical  therapy  management 
of  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis:  a  meta-analysis.  Am  J  Respir  Crit 
Care  Med  I995;151(3  Pt  l):846-850. 

1 .1  Lorin  MI,  Denning  CR.  Evaluation  of  postural  drainage  by  measure- 
ment of  sputum  \olume  and  consistency.  .Am  J  Phys  Med  1 97 1: 
-S0(.S):2I.S-2I9, 

14.  Tecklin  JS.  Holsclaw  DS.  Evaluation  of  bronchial  drainage  in  pa- 
tients with  cystic  tibrosis.  Phys  Ther  197.s;.s5(  101:1081-1084. 

\5.  Cochrane  GM.  Webber  B.A.  Clarke  S\V .  Effects  of  sputum  on  pul- 
monary function.  Br  Med  J  I977;2(6096):l  I81-1 183. 

16.  Wong  JW,  Keens  TO,  Wannamaker  EM,  Douglas  PT,  Crozier  N, 
Levison  H,  Aspin  N.  Effects  of  gravity  on  tracheal  mucus  transport 
rates  in  normal  subjects  and  in  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis.  Pediat- 
rics 1977;6()(2):  146-152. 

17.  Pryor  J  A.  Webber  BA.  Hodson  ME.  Batten  JC.  Evaluation  of  the 
forced  expiration  technique  as  an  adjunct  to  postural  drainage  in 
treatment  of  cystic  fibrosis.  Br  Med  J  1979;2(6I87):417-4I8. 

18.  Pryor  JA.  Webber  BA.  An  evaluation  of  the  forced  expiration  tech- 
nique as  an  adjunct  to  postural  drainage.  Physiotherapy  I979;65(  10); 
304-307. 

19.  Murphy  MB.  Concannon  D.  FitzGerald  MX.  Chest  percussion:  help 
or  hindrance  to  postural  drainage':"  Ir  Med  J  1983;76(4);  189-190. 

20.  de  Boeck  C.  Zinman  R.  Cough  versus  chest  physiotherapy:  a  com- 
parison of  the  acute  effects  on  pulmonary  function  in  patients  \\ith 
cystic  fibrosis.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  1 984;  129t  1 1:182-184. 

21.  Batenian  JRM.  Newman  SP.  Daunt  KM.  Sheahan  NF.  Paula  D. 
Clarke  SW.  Is  cough  as  effective  as  chest  physiother;ip\  in  the  re- 
inoval  of  excessive  tracheobronchial  secretions?  Thorax  1981;36(9); 
683-687. 


776 


Risi'ik\n)R>  CvRf  •  JiLY  2002  Vol  47  Nu  7 


PosinoNiNci  Vi;ksus  Postural  Drainagl 


22.  Anihoniscn  P.  Rils  P.  Sogaaal-AiKlL-ison  T.  The  \,iluc  ol  lung  phys- 
imheraps  in  llic  lrcaliin.-nl  nl  acuk-  exacerbalioiis  in  thnmic  bron- 
chitis. .-Wl  Med  Scand  l%4;l7.S(6):7l.'i-7m. 

2.^,  Cainphcll  AH.  O'Connell  JM.  Wilson  1-.  The  elTccl  iil  chcsi  phys- 
iotherapy upon  the  FF.V|  in  chronic  bronchitis.  Med  J  .'Xust  l')75; 
l(2):33-35. 

24.  Newton  DAG.  Stephenson  A.  The  etTect  of  physiotherapy  on  pul- 
monary function:  a  laboratory  siiid>    I  ancct  |y78;2(S()X.1):228-22'), 

2.S.  Murray  JF.  The  ketchup-holllc  iiielhod.  N  Fiitil  .1  Med  l')7>);^(Mli:(l): 
1155-1157. 

26.  Oldenburg  FA  Jr.  Dolovich  MB.  Montgomery  JM.  Ncwhouse  MT. 
Eltecls  of  postural  drainage,  exercise,  and  cough  on  mucus  clearance 
in  chronic  bronchitis.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  l979:120(4):739-745. 

27.  Rochester  DF.  Goldberg  SK.  Techniques  of  respiratory  physical  ther- 
apy. Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  I').S();I22(5  Pt  2):I33-I46. 

25.  Connors  AF  Jr.  Hamnion  WF.  Martin  RJ.  Rogers  RM.  Chest  phys- 
ical therapy:  the  immediate  effect  on  oxygenation  in  acutely  ill  pa- 
tients. Chest  1980;78(4):559-564. 

29.  Hodgkin  JE.  The  scientific  status  of  chest  physiotherapy.  Respir 
Care  198l:26(7):657-6.59 

.W.  Sutton  PP.  Pavia  D.  Baleman  JRM.  Clarke  SW.  Chest  physiother- 
apy: a  review.  Eur  J  Respir  Dis  I9,S2:W(3):I88-2()I. 

31.  Wollmer  P.  Ursing  K,  Midgren  B.  Eriksson  L.  Inefficiency  of  chest 
percussion  in  the  physical  therapy  of  chronic  bronchitis.  Eur  J  Respir 
Dis  l985;66(4):233-239. 

32.  Kirilloff  LH.  Owens  OR.  Rogers  RM.  Mazzocco  MC.  Does  chest 
physical  therapy  work.'  Chest  I985:8,S|3):436-U4. 

33.  Faling  LJ.  Pulmonary  rehabilitation — physical  modalities.  Clin  Chest 
Med  I986;7l4):599-6IS. 

34.  Radford  R.  Barutt  J.  Billingsley  JG.  Hill  W .  Lawson  WH.  Willich 
W.  A  rational  basis  for  percussion-augmented  mucociliary  clearance. 
Respir  Care  l982;27(5):556-5fi3. 

3.5.  Barren  SE.  .Abbas  HM.  Monitoring  during  physiotherapy  alter  open 
heart  surgery .  Physiotherapy  l97S;64|9):272-273. 

36.  Bateman  JRM.  Newman  SP.  Daunt  KM.  Pavia  D.  Clarke  SW.  Re- 
gional lung  clearance  of  excessive  bronchial  secretions  during  chest 
physiotherapy  in  patients  with  stable  chronic  airways  obstruction. 
Lancet  1979:1181111:294-297. 

37.  Thomson  ML.  Phillipakos  D.  A  preliminary  study  of  the  effect  of  a 
vibrating  pad  on  bronchial  clearance.  .Am  Re\  Respir  Dis  1976; 
ll3(l):92-96. 


38.  Maxwell  M.  Redmond  A.  Comparative  trial  of  manual  and  mechan- 
ical percussion  technique  with  gravity-assisted  bronchial  drainage  in 
patients  with  cystic  fibrosis.  Arch  Dis  Child  1979;.54(7):542-.544. 

39.  Holody  B,  Goldberg  HS.  The  effect  of  mechanical  vibration  phys- 
iotherapy on  arterial  oxygenation  in  acutely  ill  patients  with  atelec- 
tasis or  pneumonia.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  l98l;l24(4):372-375. 

4(1.  Scanlon  C.  Fgan's  fundamentals  of  respiratory  care.  6th  ed.  St  Louis; 
Mosby;  1995. 

41.  Sutton  PP.  Lopez-Vidriero  MT.  I'aua  D.  Ncuiiian  SP.  Clay  M.M. 
Webber  B,  et  al.  As.se.ssment  of  percussion,  vibratory-shaking  and 
breathing  exercises  in  chest  physiotherapy.  Eur  J  Respir  Dis  1985: 
66(2):  147-152. 

42.  Wollmer  P.  Ursing  K.  Midgrcn  B.  Eriksson  I..  Inefficiency  of  chest 
percussion  in  the  physical  therapy  of  chronic  bronchitis,  luir  J  Respir 
Dis  I985;66(4):233-2.W. 

43.  Feldinan  J.  Traver  GA.  Taussig  LM.  Maximal  expiratory  Hows  after 
postural  drainage.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  1979:1  l9l2):239-245. 

44.  Van  der  Schans  CP.  Piers  DA.  Postma  DS.  Effect  of  manual  percu- 
sion  on  tracheobronchial  clearance  in  patients  with  chronic  airflow 
obstruction  and  excessive  tnichcobronchial  secretion.  Thorax  1986; 
4l(6):448-452. 

45.  Hammon  WE.  Martin  RJ.  Chest  physical  therapy  for  acute  atelecta- 
sis: a  report  on  its  effectiveness.  Phys  Ther  l9SI;6l(2):2l7-220. 

46.  Stiller  K.  Geake  T.  Taylor  J.  Grant  R.  Hall  B.  Acute  lobar  atelectasis: 
a  comparison  of  two  chest  physiotherapy  regimens.  Chest  1990; 
98(6):1336-1340. 

47.  Oldenburg  FA  Jr.  Dolovich  MD.  Montgomery  JM.  Newhouse  MT. 
Effects  of  postural  drainage,  exercise  and  cough  on  mucus  clearance 
in  chronic  bronchitis.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  1979;12n(4):739-745. 

48.  Tyler  ML.  Complications  of  positioning  and  chest  physiotherapy. 
Respir  Care  I982;27(4i:458^66. 

49.  Baldwin  DR.  Hill  AL.  Peckham  DG.  Knox  AJ.  Effect  of  addition  of  ex- 
ercise to  chest  physiotherapy  on  sputum  expectoration  and  lung  lunction 
in  adults  with  cystic  fibrosis.  Respir  Med  1994;8S(  1 1:49-53. 

50.  Sahl  W,  Bilton  D.  Dodd  M.  Webb  AK.  Effect  of  exercise  and  phys- 
iotherapy in  aiding  sputum  expectoration  in  adults  with  cystic  fibro- 
sis. Thorax  I989;44(I2):I006-1008. 

51.  Zach  MS.  Purrer  B.  Oberwaldner  B.  Effect  of  swimming  on  forced 
expiration  and  sputum  clearance  in  cystic  fibrosis.  Lancet  1981; 
2(8257):I20I-I203. 

52.  Bilton  D.  Dodd  ME.  Abbott  JV.  Webb  AK.  The  benefits  of  exercise 
combined  with  physiotherapy  in  the  treatment  of  adults  with  cystic 
fibrosis.  Respir  Med  l9y2;86(6):.S07-51 1. 


Respiratory  Carl  •  iv\,\  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


777 


Airway  Physiology,  Autogenic  Drainage, 
and  Active  Cycle  of  Breathing 

Craig  D  Lapin  MD 


Introduction 
Airway  Physiology 

Equal  Pressure  Point 

Collateral  Ventilation 
Autogenic  Drainage 
Active  Cycle  of  Breathing  Technique 
Evidence-Based  Medicine 
Summary 


Airway  clearance  techniques  are  used  to  aid  in  mucus  clearance  in  a  variety  of  disease  states. 
Autogenic  drainage  and  active-cycle-of-breathing  technique  are  2  such  modalities  that  rely  heavily 
on  basic  airway  physiology  to  enhance  clearance.  In  this  review  I  discuss  the  equal  pressure  point, 
huffing,  and  asynchronous  and  collateral  ventilation,  and  review  the  literature  and  theory  regard- 
ing autogenic  drainage  and  active  cycle  of  breathing.  Selection  of  airway  clearance  techniques  is 
discussed  in  the  light  of  evidence-based  medicine.  Key  wards:  airway  physiology,  ainvay  clearance 
techniques,  chest  physical  therapy,  equal  pressure  point,  huff,  autogenic  drainage,  active  cycle  of  breath- 
ing technique.     [Respir  Care  2002;47(7):778-785] 


Introduction 

Production  and  clearance  of  airway  secretions  occurs 
throughout  the  respiratory  tract  on  a  daily,  minute-by- 
minute  basis.  Under  normal  conditions  the  volume  and 
viscoelastic  properties  of  the  secretions  produced  are  eas- 
ily managed  by  the  cilia,  regular  respiration,  and,  when 
necessary,  the  occasional  cough.  In  many  disease  states, 
however,  changes  in  mucus  characteristics  or  quantity,  or 
changes  in  lung  physiology  overwhelm  the  normal  muco- 
ciliary escalator. 


Craig  D  l^pin  MD  is  affiliated  with  tine  Division  of  Pediatric  Pulmonan.' 
Medicine,  Connecticut  Children's  Medical  Center,  Hartford.  Connecticut. 

Dr  I.apin  presented  a  version  of  this  report  at  the  17th  .\nnual  New 
Horizons  Symposium  at  the  47th  International  Respiratory  Congress.  San 
Antonio.  Texas.  December  14.  2001. 

Correspondence:  Craig  D  l.apm  MD.  Division  ol  Pediatric  Pulnionar\ 
Medicine.  Connecticut  Children's  Medical  Center.  282  Washington  Street. 
Hartford  CT  06106. 


Over  the  past  35  years  a  multitude  of  airway  clearance 
techniques  have  been  developed,  introduced,  refined,  re- 
.searched,  and  used  in  patient  populations,  from  asthma  to 
atelectasis,  from  cystic  fibrosis  (CF)  to  chronic  obstructive 
pulmonary  disease  (COPD),  to  help  assist  normal  mucus  clear- 
ance mechanisms.  Chest  physical  therapy  has  become  almost 
synonymous  with  postural  drainage  and  percussion  (PD&P). 
Newer  modalities  include  autogenic  drainage  (AD),  active 
cycle  of  breathing  technique  (ACBT),  positive  expiratory  pres- 
sure methods,  high-frequency  airway  oscillation  (flutter), 
high-frequency  chest  wall  oscillation  {The  Vest),  intrapulmo- 
nai7  percussive  ventilation  (IPV),  and  mechanical  insuffla- 
tion-exsuftlation  (the  "iii-exsufllator""!.  The  impetus  tor  this 
explosion  in  airway  clearance  options,  as  with  any  medical 
treatment,  has  been  the  continued  search  for  improved  effi- 
cacy and  tidherence  to  a  presciibed  therap). 

Mucus  is  moved  by  3  mechanisms.  First,  slug  flow  de- 
scribes the  means  by  which  a  semi-solid  mucus  plug  ob- 
structing or  partially  obstructing  an  airway  can  be  pushed 
from  behind  by  air  tlow.  Second,  annular  flow  describes 
miictis  mo\  ing  tiloiig  the  v\alls  of  the  airw a> .  either  being 
pulled  aloTig  by  expiratory  air  tlow  or  transported  by  cilia. 


778 


Respirator'*-  Care  •  July  2002  Voi.  47  No  7 


Airway  Pii\.sK)i(Kiv.  Aukkii.nk  DkAiNACih,  anu  Activi:  C^ci.i;  oi  Bklahiing 


Third.  ini.M  JIdw  describes  iicriisoli/L'd  mucus  dial  is  ex- 
haled as  suspended  droplets.  Slug  and  annular  flow  ac- 
count for  the  majority  of  airway  secretion  clearance. 

There  are  only  2  o\er-riding  physical  principles  to  air- 
way clearance  techniques:  first,  there  must  be  airtlow;  and. 
second,  for  the  patient  to  have  air  flow .  the  patient  must  he 
able  to  get  air  behind  the  mucus. 


Airway  Physiology 

All  airway  clearance  techniques,  lo  be  errecli\e.  must 
inleracl  with  liuig  ph\siology  to  enhance  secretion  mo\e- 
ment.  A  clear  and  thorough  luidcrsianding  ol  a  few  phys- 
iologic concepts  and  hypotheses  will  help  the  respiratory 
practitioner  understand  how  each  airway  clearance  tech- 
nique works.  Without  knowledge  or  consideration  of  these 
principles,  someone  might  suggest,  for  example,  that  hav- 
ing a  patient  mentally  visualizing  increased  secretion  clear- 
ance w  hile  w  atching  television  will  impro\  e  secretion  clear- 
ance! Not  only  can  know  ledge  of  the  basis  of  these  therapies 
help  understand  why  they  work:  it  may  also  aid  in  decid- 
ing which  modality  to  use  for  which  disease  state. 


EQUAL 

PRESSURE 

POINT 


Ppl  =  10  cmH2  0 

PstI  =  10  cmH20 

Palv  =  20cmH2O 


Fig.  1 .  The  equal  pressure  point  concept.  Pressure  is  dissipated  as 
air  flows  towards  the  mouth.  The  point  at  which  the  pressures 
inside  and  outside  the  wall  are  the  same  is  the  equal  pressure 
point  (EPP).  Downstream  (toward  the  mouth)  from  the  EPP,  the 
airway  is  compressed  because  the  pressure  surrounding  it  is  greater 
than  the  pressure  in  the  lumen.  Pp,  ^  expiratory  force.  P^,,  =  static 
elastic  recoil.  P^,^  -  intraluminal  (alveoloar)  pressure.  (From  Ref- 
erence 1,  with  permission.) 


Equal  Pressure  Point 

The  equal  pressure  point  (EPP)  concept  is  integral  to 
understanding  the  airtlow  limitation  that  is  so  important  in 
many  aspects  of  pulmonary  medicine,  from  pulmonary 
function  testing  (PPT)  to  airway  clearance  techniques.  The 
point  at  which  the  intraluminal  and  extraluminal  pressures 
are  equal  is  the  EPP  (Fig.  1 ).  Beyiind  that  point  (ie.  toward 
the  mouth),  the  external  pressure  around  the  airway  is 
greater  than  the  pressure  within  it.  and  the  airway  com- 
presses, which  limits  (low .  During  a  forced  exhalation  the 
pressure  in  the  airways  (intraluminal)  decreases  from  the 
peripheral  airw  ays  to  the  mouth,  because  of  frictional  pres- 
sure loss  and  convecti\e  acceleration  pressure  loss."  The 
pressure  decreases  because  of  the  movement  of  air  from 
the  periphery  (with  a  cumulatisely  large  cross-sectional 
airway  area)  centrally  (with  gradual  cumulative  cross-sec- 
tional area  decreasing).  During  the  exhalation  the  extralu- 
minal (pleural)  pressure  remains  relatively  constant:  the 
intraluminal  pressure  gradually  decreases.  Thus  there  is  a 
wave  of  equal  pressure  points  moving  deeper  (more  pe- 
ripherally) into  the  airways  as  exhalation  proceeds  and 
intraluminal  pressures  fall. 

The  site  of  the  EPP  is  determined  by  the  amount  ol 
expiratory  force  and  the  elastic  recoil  (see  Fig.  I ).  A  higher 
expiratory  force  shifts  the  EPP  peripherally  (tovvard  the 


alveoli).  Likewise,  if  the  forced  exhalation  is  initiated  at  a 
lower  lung  volume,  the  pressure  from  the  static  elastic 
recoil  will  be  less,  as  will  the  intraluminal  pressure,  and 
the  resulting  EPP  will  again  be  more  peripheral.  Initiated 
at  normal  lung  volumes  or  with  normal-to-high  expiratory 
pressure,  the  EPP  is  estimated  to  lie  at  the  carina  or  larger 
bronchi.^  which  are  reinforced  by  cartilage  and  thus  resist 
collapse. 

Cough  is  the  body's  natural  backup  inechanism  for  air- 
way clearance.  Usually  a  deeper  inspiration  is  followed  by 
closure  of  the  glottis,  high  intrapulmonary  pressures  are 
built  up  behind  the  glottis,  and  when  the  glottis  opens, 
supra-maximal,  expiratory,  turbulent  air  Hows  (flow  tran- 
sients) are  generated.  The  EPP  plays  an  extremely  impor- 
tant role  in  the  effectiveness  of  cough,  because  a  substan- 
tial jump  in  airflow  selocity  occurs  at  points  of  narrow ing 
(choke  points).  High  linear  airflow  velocity  provides  the 
turbulent  How,  high  shearing  forces  at  the  airway  walls, 
and  high  kinetic  energy  that  move  secretions  cephalad — 
analogous  to  the  effect  of  a  strong  wind  over  a  body  of 
water:  and  the  waves  and  spray  generated  are  visibly  sim- 
ilar. Physiologically,  consider  that  the  amount  of  air  flow- 
ing past  a  choke  point  at  any  instant  is  equal  to  that  flow- 
ing in  less  constricted  regions.  The  only  way  it  can  be 
equal  under  such  conditions  is  it  ilie  linear  gas  velocity  is 
L'reater. 


Respiratory  Carh  •  ivi\  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


779 


Airway  Physiology,  Autogenic  Drainage,  and  Active  Cycle  of  Breathing 


Maximum  forced 
flow-volume  loop  1 


Volume  (L) 


fVlaximum  forced 
flow-volume  loop  2 


o 


Volume  (L) 


Fig.  2.  Flow-volume  curves  comparing  flow-transients  from  voluntary  cough  (left)  and  huff  (nght).  relative  to  the  subject's  maximum  forced 
flow-volume  loop. 


Mathematically,  if  flow  is  equal  and  cross-sectional 
Area-,  is  smaller  (ie.  more  narrow)  than  Area,,  and 


Flow 
Volume 


Volume/Second 
Area  X  Length 


then 


Flow  = 

Velocity     = 


(Area  X  Distance )/Second 
Distance/Time 


and 


Flow 


Area,  X  Velocity i  =  Areai  X  Velocity^ 


then  Velocity,  must  be  greater  than  Velocity,. 

Another  means  to  produce  supra-maximal  air  flow  and 
high  linear  velocities  is  by  huff  (Fig.  2).  Huff  is  a  forced 
expiratory  maneuver,  usually  initiated  from  mid-to-low 
lung  volumes  and  is  performed  with  an  open  glottis.'*  Again, 
the  EPP  augments  the  linear  velocities  occurring  with  this 
maneuver.  Although  a  huff  does  not  produce  the  same 
magnitude  of  tlow  transients  as  a  cough,  it  has  several 
other  advantages.  A  cough  is  generated  by  the  build-up  of 
extremely  high  intraluminal  and  cxtraluminai  pressures,  so 
with  cough  there  is  more  potential  for  substantial  airway 
collapse  at  the  EPP.  especially  if  airway  stability  is  lack- 
ing. Cartilaginous  support  decreases  from  trachea  and  larger 
bronchi  to  the  smaller  bronchi,  and  probably  is  minimal 
within  bronchioles.  Although  smooth  muscle  may  aid  in 
maintaining  the  patency  of  the  smaller  airways,  a  cough 
may  compress  those  airways  too  much  to  allow  effective 
clearance.'^  Another  mechanism  that  impairs  cough  clear- 


ance is  dynamic  collapse,  which  may  occur  in  disease 
states  that  have  increased  airways  compliance  (eg,  CF, 
COPD).  Even  the  larger  airways  may  become  unstable  if 
frequent  coughing  has  damaged  the  cartilage  (eg,  chronic 
bronchitis,  CF). 

Coughing  is  mostly  reflexive  (although  it  can  be  "di- 
rected"), so  cough  does  not  allow  as  much  conscious  con- 
trol of  starting  lung  volume  or  pressures  developed.  Thus, 
huff  has  the  advantage  that  the  patient  and  therapist  can 
adjust  the  huff  to  balance  the  potential  of  airway  collapse 
against  expiratory  force.  Huff  can  also  be  started  at  various 
lung  volumes,  thus  allowing  the  shift  of  the  EPP  into  more 
peripheral  airways  and  maximizing  air  tlow  there. 

But  the  question  arises  whether  the  flows  generated  by 
a  huff  or  by  moving  the  EPP  are  sufficient  to  promote 
mucus  clearance.  Studies  have  shown  that  mucus  can  be 
mobilized  with  expiratory  airflow  velocities  of  1.0-2.5 
m/s  for  annular  flow  or  >  2.5  m/s  for  mist  flow ."  Mucus 
transport  can  even  occur  from  the  flow  of  tidal  breathing, 
in  some  circumstances.'  Bennett  and  Zeman**  detennined 
that  airway  clearance  with  huff  was  faster  than  control  and 
similar  to  that  generated  by  voluntary  cough. 

For  mucus  clearance  to  occur,  air  must  be  able  to  get 
behind  (ie.  peripheral  to)  the  mucus.  Even  in  normal  lungs, 
time  constants  vary  among  lung  regions,  and  asynchro- 
nous ventilation  (ie,  differences  in  lung  filling)  occurs  sec- 
ondary to  regional  and  stratified  inhomogeneity.''  Mucus 
obstruction  (partial  or  complete)  in  disease  states  may  in- 
crease the  inhomogeneity.'"  substantially  impairing  the 
ability  to  get  air  past  mucus  obstructions.  Many  airway 
clearance  techniques  include  a  breath-hold  to  compensate 
for  asynchrt)nous  ventilation. 

Inspiration  dilates  airways  as  negative  pleural  pressure 
causes  the  luniis  to  inflate,  causins  a  transient  decrease  in 


780 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Airway  PHVsioi.otiv,  Autogknic  Drainage,  and  Activk  Cyci.k  ui-  Brhaihing 


llow 


Fig.  3.  Airway  diameter  increases  during  inspiration  (left),  which 
decreases  resistance  and  therefore  increases  flow.  Airway  diam- 
eter decreases  during  expiration,  which  increases  resistance  and 
therefore  decreases  flow. 


the  resistance  to  airway  flow  (relative  to  exlialalioii)  (Fig. 
3),  which  aids  in  getting  air  behind  the  mucus,  interde- 
pendence between  adjacent  parenchymal  lung  units  occurs 
because  of  the  elasticity  of  the  surrounding  interstitium,' ' 
and  also  occurs  between  the  lungs  and  chest  wall.'-  The 
effect  of  both  help  to  preserve  uniform  \entilation  distri- 
bution. 

Collateral  \  entilation 

Collateral  ventilation  channels  (the  canals  of  Lambert, 
channels  of  Martin,  and  pores  of  Kohn)  (Fig.  4)  between 
adjacent  contiguous  lobules  and  adjacent  alveoli  are  prob- 
ably not  important  in  normal  ventilation,  but  may  be  im- 
portant when  there  is  airway  obstruction."  '"* 

The  major  physiologic  factors  in  collateral  ventilation 
are  collateral  resistance  and  respiratory  frequency  relative 
to  regional  time  constants.  Increasing  lung  volume  sub- 
stantially decreases  collateral  resistance,  probably  as  a  re- 
sult of  the  outward  forces  of  interdependence  on  the  ob- 
structed region  and  increased  segmental  volume.'^  At  an 
increased  respiratory  rate  and  flow,  an  unobstructed  region 
will  till  more  rapidly  than  a  partially  or  completely  ob- 
structed one.  because  the  pressure  drop  across  the  obstruc- 
tion is  less  and  flow  is  less  impeded.  As  the  time  constants 
of  the  connected  pathways  shift,  the  more  slowly  ventilat- 
ing unit  will  receive  part  of  its  inspired  volume  via  col- 
lateral channels  from  the  more  rapidly  ventilating  unit  (this 
is  known  as  pciidelluft  flow).  Lower  respiratory  frequency 


Interbronchiolar  channels  of  Martin 


Bronchiolar-alveolar 
channels  of  Lambert 


Alveolar  pores  of  Kohn 


Fig.  4.  Collateral  ventilation  channels. 


and  larger  tidal  \oluiiie  should  increase  the  degree  of  col- 
lateral ventilation.'" 

Autogenic  Drainage 

Autogenic  drainage  was  conceived  by  Jean  Chevaillier 
in  Belgium  in  1967  at  the  Zeepreventorium  De  Haan.  an 
institution  dedicated  to  the  care  of  difficult  asthma.  Care- 
ful t)bservation  had  suggested  that  more  mucus  was  cleared 
during  breathing  exercises,  playing,  laughing,  forced  ex- 
piratory maneuvers,  or  even  sleep  than  during  postural 
drainage,  percussion,  or  pursed-lip  breathing  (Jean  Chev- 
aillier, Physiotherapy  Departement,  Zeepreventorium  De 
Haan,  Belgium,  personal  communication,  1990).  The  un- 
derlying concept  of  AD  is  to  achieve  high  expiratory  flows 
in  various  generations  of  bronchi,  by  controlled  breathing, 
but  to  avoid  coughing  or  substantial  airway  closure.''''* 
The  AD  technique  requires  feedback  to  the  patient  until 
the  patient  attunes  to  the  auditory  and  chest  sensations 
associated  with  mucus  clearance. 

Autogenic  drainage  is  initiated  with  a  slow  inspiration 
through  the  nose,  followed  by  a  2-3-second  breath-hold. 
Breathing  slowly  through  the  nose  humidifies  and  warms 
the  inspired  air  and  minimizes  the  air  tlow  turbulence, 
which  helps  prevent  coughing.  The  breath-hold  and  slow 
inspiration  provide  optimal  filling  of  obstructed  lung  seg- 
ments while  avoiding  excessive  intrapleural  pressure 
(which  could  compress  unstable  airways).  Phase  1  (periph- 
eral "unsticking"  of  mucus)  is  accomplished  by  having  the 
patient  exhale,  with  an  open  glottis,  down  into  expiratory 
reserve  volume  (ERV).  but  not  to  residual  volume.  This  is 
similar  to  steaming  a  mirror  or  eyeglasses.  The  patient 
then  breathes  with  inhalations  of  mid-tidal  volume,  com- 
pleted each  time  with  a  2-3-second  breath-hold,  and  ex- 
hales into  the  ERV.  Peak  expiratory  tlow  (PEF)  should  be 
high,  but  without  generating  wheeze,  bronchospasm.  or 
compression  of  collapsible  airway  segments.  Flow-volume 
loops  (Fig.  5)  show  substantial  overlap  at  or  above  the 
effort-independent  portion  of  a  maximum  expiratory  flow- 
volume  maneuver.  After  several  repeated  breaths  in  this 
manner,  to  mobilize  peripheral  secretions,  the  patient  grad- 
ually inhales  a  tidal  volume  from  ERV.  to  functional  re- 
sidual capacity  and  then  into  the  inspiratory  reserve  vol- 
ume (IRV).  Breaths  in  the  range  of  functional  residual 
capacity  begin  Phase  2  (collection  of  peripheral  and  apical 
secretions).  Inspiration  continues  to  be  punctuated  by  the 
breath-hold,  and,  again,  compression  of  airways  is  mini- 
mized during  exhalation.  Coughing  or  expectorating  is 
strongly  discouraged.  Finally.  Phase  3  (evacuation)  starts 
from  low-to-mid-IRV.  with  breath-holding  inspirations  fol- 
lowed by  a  minimal  forced  expiratory  maneuver  or  gentle 
clearing  of  the  throat.  Unproductive  ctiughing  with  forced 
expiration  is  undesirable  at  any  stage."'''  Figure  6  dia- 
grams the  AD  phases. 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


781 


Airway  Physioi.ociy,  Autogenic  Drainagi;,  and  Activk  Cycle  of  Breathing 


5  - 


(A 

|3 

LL 


2  3 

Volume  (L) 


3 

Peak  flow 

_— 

_  Normal  breathing 

— 



_  Autogenic  drainage 

'in 

- 

il 

r 
t 

'-•f^ 

^^ 

1 1 

1  T 

l^^J 1 .^ 

1 

Volume  (L) 

Ct 

—  *^s 

« 

2 

~       /                                           V 

i 

A 

J 

"A 

_^ 

'                                                                V 

tf) 

V 

n 

1                                            % 

\ 

|1 

V 

U- 

'•          ^ 

.'"^v 

V. 

v 

,-'^x   ^ 

«^ 

f 

« 

v^ 

i      '^ 

V 

1           .'I      1 

!     , 

^^. 

,   /  .     ^ 

■  A-    . 

1  2 

Volume  (L) 


Fig.  5.  Flow-volume  curves  showing  overlap  in  the  effort-independent  regions  of  the  maximum  forced  exhalation  curve  while  performing 
autogenic  drainage  in  (A)  bronchorrheic.  (B)  asthmatic,  and  (C)  cystic  fibrosis  patients.  (From  Reference  19,  with  permission.) 


Unfortunately  there  have  been  few  studies  published  on 
AD.  In  the  CF  literature.  Ptleger  et  al-"  compared  AD  to 
high-pressure  positive  expiratory  pressure  and  found  both 
significantly  improved  PFT  values.  Although  AD  caused 
the  most  significant  change,  it  produced  the  least  amount 
of  sputum.  A  study  by  Davidson  et  al  (never  published  in 
a  peer-reviewed  journal)-'  addressed  patient  preference  for 
AD  (a  complicated  technique)  to  PD&P.  In  a  planned 
2-year  crossover  study  there  were  no  differences  in  clini- 
cal status  or  PFT  values,  which  improved  in  both  groups. 
Compliance  was  strictly  monitored.  At  the  end  of  the  first 
year,  almost  half  the  AD  group  refused  to  change  over  to 


Phase  1 

2 

3 

m 

W\   V 

L 

n 

M(\ 

r 

m 

ERV 

Vfrc 

HV 

n 

invi 

RV 

Fig.  6.  Lung  volumes  dunng  phases  of  autogenic  drainage.  Phase 
1:  Unsticking.  Phase  2:  Collection.  Phase  3:  Evacuation.  ERV  = 
expiratory  reserve  volume.  FRC  =  functional  residual  capacity. 
RV  -=  residual  volume. 


PD&P  because  they  thought  AD  was  more  effective.  One 
study  comparing  AD,  ACBT,  and  PD&P  found  improved 
ventilation  (as  measured  via  radiolabeled  aerosol  technique), 
but  AD  caused  a  better  improvement  of  airway  clearance  rale 
centrally  and  for  the  v\hole  lung  than  did  ACBT.  There  was 
no  significant  effect  on  PFT  values  or  blood  oxygen  satura- 
tion.-- A  comparison  of  AD  to  PD&P  showed  a  small  but 
statistically  significant  desaturalion  with  PD&P  and  a  small 
but  statistically  significant  improved  saturation  with  .AD.-' 
Comparison  of  sputum  rheology  following  flutter  therapy 
and  AD  showed  no  change  with  AD,-^  as  might  be  expected. 
Savci  et  al-^  compared  AD  and  ACBT  with  COPD  pa- 
tients over  a  20-day  period.  Both  therapies  statistically 
improved  forced  vital  capacity,  PEF,  P.,o,,  blood  satura- 
tion oxygen,  and  exercise  performance.  For  AD  there  was 
also  a  statistical  impio\ement  in  forced  expiratory  Nolume 
in  the  first  second,  forced  expirators  flow  during  the  mid- 
dle half  of  the  forced  \ital  capacity.  P.,( ,),.  and  d_\spnea 
score.  The  impro\ement  in  P,,,  was  clinically  important 
and  statistically  significant  for  both  AD  and  .ACBT.  but 
forced  vital  capacity,  forced  expiratory  volume  in  the  first 
.second,  and  PEF  were  clinicalls  improved  only  by  AD. 
not  by  ACBT.  Impixnement  in  PEF  and  P.,,,),  were  sta- 
tistically better  in  the  AD  group  than  the  ACBT  group,  and 


782 


Resi'IRMor^  Care  •  Ji'ly  2002  Voi  47  No  7 


Airway  Physiology,  Autogenic  Drainage,  and  Activh  Cycli;  oi  BkI'Vuiing 


FRC 


BC     FET 


Fig.  7.  Lung  volumes  during  active  cycle  of  breathing.  IRV  -  in- 
spiratory reserve  volume.  V^  =  tidal  volume.  FRC  =  functional 
residual  capacity.  ERV  =  expiratory  reserve  volume.  RV  residual 
volume.  BC  =  breathing  control.  TEE  =  thoracic  expansion  exer- 
cises. FET  -  forced  expiratory  technique. 

blood  oxygen  saturation  increase  was  statistically  higher 
in  the  ACBT  group  than  in  the  AD  group. 

Active  Cycle  of  Breathing  Teclinique 

Like  AD.  ACBT  (under  the  name  forced  cApiratory 
technique  [FET])  was  developed  (by  Thompson  and 
Thompson,  a  physician  and  therapist  working  with  pa- 
tients in  New  Zealand)  for  secretion  clearance  in  asthma.-" 
ACBT  is  now  the  most  common  technique  used  in  England. 
From  its  earliest  description  as  an  airway  clearance  ad- 
junct. ACBT  included  1  or  2  huffs  from  mid-to-low  lung 
volumes,  followed  by  a  period  of  relaxed,  controlled  dia- 
phragmatic breathing,  with  expansion  breathing  exercises. 
Secretions  mobilized  to  the  upper  airways  would  then  be 
expectorated  and  the  process  repeated.-''  Because  of  some 
misinterpretation  that  the  huffing  was  the  major  or  only 
part  of  the  technique,  its  main  proponents  clarified  and 
emphasized  the  integral  importance  of  relaxed  breathing 
control  (BC)  and  thoracic  expansion  exercises  (TEE).  The 
characteristics  of  effective  and  ineffective  huffing  were 
also  delineated.-*  For  further  clarification,  the  name  of  the 
technique  was  changed  from  FET  to  ACBT. 

Figure  7  shows  the  respiratory  volume  movements  of 
ACBT.  ACBT  begins  with  BC,  which  is  gentle,  relaxed 
breathing  at  the  patient's  own  tidal  volume  and  resting 
respiratory  rate.  BC  is  also  interspersed  throughout  the 
cycle  to  allow  recovery  and  prevent  any  increase  in  air 
flow  obstruction.  The  duration  of  BC  is  dependent  on  the 
patient's  signs  of  airtlow  obstruction.  BC  may  be  fol- 
lowed by  TEE  or  several  huffs  (also  termed  FETs  here- 
after). TEE  are  deep.  slow,  relaxed  inspirations  to  IRV. 
with  or  without  breath-holds,  with  quiet,  unforced  ex- 
halations. These  respirations  help  maximize  ventilation 
via  collateral  channels.  This  portion  of  the  cycle  aids 
with  problems  of  asynchronous  ventilation  and  blocked 
airways. 

The  FET  is  a  series  of  huffs,  usually  starting  from  mid 
lung  volume,  slightly  above  the  tidal  volume,  with  an  easy. 


Fig.  8.  Three  active-cycle-of-breathing  routines.  A.  The  simplest 
routine,  most  applicable  to  mucus  production  without  airway  hy- 
per-reactivity, atelectasis,  or  plugged  airways.  B.  t^/lore  periods  of 
or  longer  breathing  control  (BC)  decreases  potential  for  broncho- 
spasm.  C.  Additional  BC  and  thoracic  expansion  exercises  (TEE) 
for  patients  with  airway  plugging,  atelectasis,  or  reactive  airway 
disease.  FET  =  forced  expiratory  technique.  (From  Reference  30, 
with  permission.) 


active  exhalation  into  the  ERV  (but  not  to  residual  vol- 
ume). The  following  huffs  may  start  at  higher  lung  vol- 
umes (further  into  the  IRV)  and  again  move  into  the  ERV 
(but  perhaps  not  as  far  as  the  first  huffs).-'  Physiologically, 
this  maneuver  starts  the  EPP  at  a  mid-lung,  then  this  dy- 
namic compression  point  moves  peripherally  with  a  con- 
comitant migration  in  the  jump  point  of  air  flow  linear 
velocity,  promoting  cephalad  movement  of  secretions.  The 
next  huff  starts  the  EPP  at  a  high  lung  volume,  and  it  again 
moves  out  peripherally.  This  combination  can  be  visual- 
ized as  a  "milking"  action,  as  it  forces  the  mucus  toward 
the  central  airways  where  it  can  be  more  easily  expelled. 

The  fluidity  of  the  ACBT  allows  easy  adaptation  to 
patients  with  different  disease  states.  The  cycle  is  adjusted 
for  each  individual  patient.  Figure  8  shows  3  examples  of 
the  ACBT.  The  simplest  is  a  repeating  cycle  of  BC,  TEE, 
BC.  FET.  and  would  be  most  applicable  for  someone  with 
mucus  hypersecretion  but  without  much  airway  hyper-re- 
activity, atelectasis,  or  airway  plugging.  The  second  ver- 
sion, potentially  for  use  with  patients  who  tend  to  suffer 
bronchospasm.  intersperses  more  periods  of.  or  longer  du- 
ration of  BC.  The  third  version  involves  additional  BC  and 
TEE.  which  might  be  more  helpful  to  someone  with  air- 
way plugging,  atelectasis,  or  reactive  airway  disease. 

Much  of  the  original  research  on  ACBT  is  found  under 
the  term  FET.  However,  with  an  ACBT  or  FET  article, 
extremely  careful  reading  of  the  methodology  section  is 


Respiratory  Care  •  Jul'i  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


783 


Airway  Physiology,  Au iogenic  Drainage,  and  Active  Cycle  of  Breathing 


necessary  id  uiidcrsiaiiiJ  vvhcilici'  the  nu)i.lalii>  under  in- 
vestigation was  the  whole  cycle  or  only  the  FET  (hutT) 
portion  ofit."  '-  ACBT  is  an  effective  treatment  in  that  it 
improves  pulmonary  function ' '  '■*  and  airw  a\  clearance.  '^■"' 
The  addition  of  PD&P,"  positive  expiratory  pressure 
techniques,"*  and  oscillating  positive  expiratory  pressure 
(Flutter)"'^"  has  been  e\  aluated.  and  the  majority  of  stud- 
ies suggest  that  ACBT  is  equivalent  or  possibly  more 
effective.  In  the  partial  review  of  the  literature  above, 
many  of  the  articles  were  on  CF  patients.-''-'''''-'-"*''^ 
However.  ACBT  has  also  been  evaluated  in  other  dis- 
eases and  pathologies,  such  as  asthma.-''  COPD.-^^' 
chronic  bronchitis. ■'"-•'-  airway  obstruction.'^  and  mu- 
cus hypersecretion. '- 


(lie  care  pro\ider  (therapist  and  physician)  is  seemingly  in 
a  quandary  as  to  whether  airway  clearance  techniques  are 
appropriate.  To  answer  that  question,  in  the  same  breath  as 
1  express  the  need  for  larger  randomized  controlled  stud- 
ies. I  also  suggest  the  use  of  the  H-of-1  study  approach,''" 
in  v\  hich  the  patient  is  both  the  test  subject  and  the  control 
subject.  If  an  airway  clearance  technique  seems  appropri- 
ate, obtain  baseline  values  and  observations  of  respiratory 
health,  initiate  the  airway  clearance  technique,  and  then 
re-evaluate.  The  length  of  time  before  re-evaluation  differs 
based  on  the  chronicity  or  acuteness  of  the  process;  if  there 
has  been  no  clinical  improvement,  then  discontinue  the 
intervention:  however,  if  the  patient  has  improved,  then 
continue  with  that  clearance  technique. 


Evidence-Based  Medicine 


Summary 


The  physiologic  rationales,  theories,  and  studies  upon 
which  AD  and  ACBT  are  based  support  their  use  in  sev- 
eral disease  states.  There  are  significant  costs  involved  in 
the  performance  of  airway  clearance  techniques,  both  in 
the  therapist  tinie  needed  to  administer  and  teach  the  tech- 
niques and  in  the  time  that  patients  or  families  expend. 
Two  excellent  reviews  recently  questioned  the  evidence 
supporting  the  use  of  any  type  of  airway  clearance.-"  ■*-' 
Many  studies  have  shown  no  significant  differences  be- 
tween the  treated  groups  and  the  controls.  In  CF.  most  of 
the  studies  compared  one  technique  to  another,  because 
use  of  airway  clearance  techniques  has  become  the  stan- 
dard of  care,  so  withholding  treatment  is  considered  un- 
ethical, thus  eliniinating  true  controls.  The  majority  of 
studies  have  been  short  or  had  small  numbers  of  patients, 
limiting  the  ability  to  determine  a  statistical  difference.  As 
well,  the  difference  between  statistical  significance  and 
clinical  importance  must  be  considered.  For  example,  a 
study  showing  p  <  0.005  for  a  3%  change  from  baseline 
in  forced  expiratory  volume  in  the  first  second  is  statisti- 
cally significant,  but  is  it  clinically  important? 

Nevertheless,  chronic  mucus  hypersecretion  is  associ- 
ated with  higher  mortality  and  faster  decline  in  pulmonary 
function  .■*-''■■**  It  has  been  suggested  that  airway  mucus  sta- 
sis may  be  important  in  certain  lung  pathologies  (eg, 
Pseudomoncis  biofihn).^^  In  asthma,  secretions  can  worsen 
ventilation-perfusion  mismatch  and  may  be  associated  with 
more  severe  or  life-threatening  exacerbations. ■*'*-''^  The  log- 
ical assumption  is  that  iniproved  clearance  will  decrease 
obstruction  and  work  of  breathing  and  thereby  improve 
oxygenation  and  potentially  improve  well-being  and  qual- 
ity of  life.  It  is  not  clear,  however,  whether  airway  clear- 
ance techniques  will  affect  those  outcomes,  even  if  they 
improve  pulmonary  function  or  secretion  production.  Two 
approaches  are  therefore  necessary.  First,  better-designed 
randomized  controlled  trials,  of  longer  duration  and  larger 
sample  size,  are  essential.  L'ntil  such  studies  are  perfornied 


Airway  clearance  techniques  are  used  to  aid  in  nuicus 
clearance  in  a  \ariety  of  disease  states.  A  clear  understand- 
ing of  airway  physiology  elucidates  the  mechanisms 
whereby  AD  and  ACBT,  "mere"  breathing  maneuvers,  can 
be  successful  in  enhancing  tnucociliarv  clearance. 


REFERENCES 

1.  Murray  JF.  Respiration.  In:  SmKh  LH.  Thier  S.  editors.  Palliophys- 
iology.  Philadelpliia:  WB  Saunders;  1985:753-854. 

2.  Mead  J.  Turner  JM.  Mackleni  PT.  Little  JB.  Significance  of  the 
relationship  between  lung  recoil  and  inaximum  expiratory  flow .  J  Appl 
Physiol  1967:22(1  ):95- 108. 

3.  Mead  J.  Expiratory  flow  limitation:  a  physiologist's  point  of  view. 
Fed  Proc  19S():39(  10):2771-2775. 

4.  Rossman  CM.  Waldes  R.  Sampson  D,  Newhouse  MT.  Effect  of 
chest  physiotherapy  on  the  reinoval  of  mucus  in  patients  with  cystic 
fibrosis.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  1982:126(  I  ):I31-135. 

5.  Rayl  JE.  Tracheobronchial  collapse  during  cough.  Radiology  1965: 
85:87-92. 

6.  Clarke  SW.  Jones  JG.  01i\ er  DR.  Resistance  to  two-phase  gas-liquid 
flow  in  airways.  J  Appl  Physiol  I970;29(4):464-471. 

7.  Sackner  MA.  Kim  CS.  Phasic  flow  mechanisms  of  mucus  clearance. 
Eur  J  Respir  Dis  Suppl  1987:153:159-164. 

8.  Bennett  WD.  Zeman  KL.  Effect  of  enhanced  supramaximal  flows  on 
cough  clearance.  J  Appl  Physiol  1994:77(4):  1577-1583. 

9.  Murray  JF.  Ventilation.  In:  Murray  JF.  The  normal  lung.  Philadel- 
phia: WB  Saunders:  1986:1 14-1 17. 

10.  Lauhe  BL.  Lmks  JM.  LaFrance  ND.  Wagner  HN  Jr.  Rosenstein  BJ. 
Homogeneity  of  bronchopulmonary  distribution  of  ""'"Tc  aerosol  in 
normal  subjects  and  in  cystic  fibrosis  patients.  Chest  1989.95(4): 
822-830. 

1 1.  Mead  J.  Takishuna  T.  Ixith  D.  Stress  distribution  in  lungs:  a  model 
of  pulmonary  elasticity.  J  Appl  Physiol  l970:28(5):596-608. 

12.  Mackleni  PT.  Relationship  between  lung  mechanics  and  ventilation 
distribution.  Physiologist  1973:16(4):58()  588. 

13.  Terry  PB,  Traystman  RJ.  Newball  HH,  Batra  G.  Menkes  HA.  Col- 
lateral ventilation  in  man.  N  Engl  J  Med  1978:298(  1  i:l()-15. 

14.  Macklem  PT.  Airway  obstruction  and  collateral  ventilation.  Physiol 
Rev  I97l;51(2):368-t36. 

15.  Woolcock  AJ.  Macklem  PT.  Mechanical  factors  influencing  collat- 
eral ventilation  in  human,  dog.  and  pig  lungs.  J  Appl  Physiol  1971; 
.3()(1):99-1I5. 


784 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


AlK\\.\\    FH'iSIOIAHI'i.  AurOUhNlC  DkAINACH,  and  ACTIVK  CyC'LI-.  ()1-   Bkl'-AIHINCi 


23. 


24. 


If).  Klad  D.  Sluichal  .V.  .Shiner  K.l.  Cornpul.ilmiKil  iiunlol  ol  osLill.ilor\ 
airfliitt  in  a  hnmchial  hirnic.ilion  Ri.-s|in  I'Inslul  l'M)S;  I  I  2l  1 ): 
9.'i-lll. 

17.  Chevaillier  J.  Autogenic  drainage  (.A. Hi  In:  l.awsun  0.  editor.  Cys- 
tic I'lbrosis  horizon.v.  Chichester:  John  Wiley;  14X4:2.^5. 

IS.  Schiini  MH.  Autogenic  drainage:  a  modern  approach  to  chest  phys- 
iotherapy in  cystic  fibrosis.  J  R  Soc  Med  l')Sy;S2lSuppl  l6):.32-.'(7. 

14.  I5ah  I.  Alexander  F.  The  mechanism  ol  autogenic  diainage  studied 
with  llo«  \olumc  curses.  Monogr  Pacdiat  l')7y:l():.S0-.S.V 

20.  Ptlcger  A.  Theissl  B.  Oberwalder  B.  7.ach  MS.  Sell-adniinistered 
chest  physiotherapy  in  cystic  fibrosis:  a  comparative  study  of  high- 
pressure  PEP  and  autogenic  drainage.  Lung  l'W2:l70(6):323-3.30. 

21.  Davidson  AGF.  Wong  LTK.  Pirie  GE.  Mcllwaine  PM.  Long-term 
comparative  trial  ol  conventional  percussion  and  drainage  physio- 
therapy to  autogenic  drainage  in  in  cystic  fibrosis  (abstract).  Pediatr 
Pulmonol  IW2:Suppl  S:A2.^?. 

22.  Miller  S.  Hall  DO.  Clayton  CB,  Nelson  R.  Chest  physiodieiapy  m 
cystic  fibrosis:  a  comparative  study  of  autogenic  drainage  and  the 
active  cycle  of  breathing  techniques  with  postural  drainage.  Thora\ 
l995;.'i0(2):l6.S-169. 

Giles  DR.  Wagener  J.  .Accurso  FJ,  Butler-Simon  N.  Shoit-term  ef- 
fects of  postural  drainage  with  clapping  \s  autogenic  drainage  on 
oxygen  saturation  and  sputum  recovery  in  patients  with  cystic  fibro- 
sis. Chest  1995:108(41:952-954. 

App  EM,  Kieselmann  R,  Reinhardt  D.  Lindemann  H.  Dasgupia  B. 
King  M.  Brand  P.  Sputum  rheology  changes  in  cystic  fibrosis  fol- 
lowing two  different  types  of  physiotherapy:  flutter  vs  autogenic 
drainage.  Chest  1 998: 1 1 4(  1 1: 1 7 1  - 1 77. 

25.  Savci  S.  Ince  DI.  Arikan  H.  A  comparison  of  autogenic  drainage  and 
the  active  cycle  of  breathing  techniques  in  patients  with  chronic 
obstructive  pulmonary  diseases.  J  Cardiopulm  Rchabil  2()00;20(  1 1: 
37-t3. 

26.  Thompson  B.  Thompson  HT.  Forced  expiration  exercises  in  asthma 
and  their  effect  on  FEV,.  N  Z  J  Physiother  1968:3:19-21. 

27.  Pryor  JA.  Webber  BA.  Hodson  ME.  Batten  JC.  Evaluation  of  the 
forced  expiration  technique  as  an  adjunct  to  postural  drainage  in 
treatment  of  cystic  fibrosis.  Br  Med  J  1979:2(6I87):417-418. 

28.  Partridge  C.  Pryor  J.  Wbber  B.  Characteristics  of  the  forced  expira- 
ton  technique.  Physiotherapy  1989:75:193-194. 

29.  Pryor  J  A.  Active  cycle  of  breathing  technique.  In:  International  Phys- 
iotherapy Group  for  C\  stic  Fibrosis.  Physioiherapy  in  the  Trcatinciu 
of  Cystic  Fihnisis  (booklet).  2nd  edition.  1995. 

30.  Webber  B  A.  Pryor  J  A.  Physiotherapy  techniques.  In:  Pryor  J  A.  Web- 
ber. BA.  editors.  Physiotherapy  for  respiratory  and  cardiac  problems. 
2nd  ed.  Edinburgh  UK:  Churchill  Livingstone;  1998:146. 

31.  Reisman  JJ.  Rivington-Law  B.  Corey  M.  Marcotte  J.  Wannamaker 
E.  Harcourt  D.  Levison  H.  Role  of  conventional  physiotherapy  in 
cystic  fibrosis.  J  Pediatr  1988:1 1 3(4):632-6.^6. 

32.  Middleton  E.  Clout  C.  Occleshaw  C.  Tindale  WB.  Parker  BV,  Bar- 
ber DC.  Barrington  NA.  The  effect  of  forced  expiration  on  the  uni- 
formity of  99Tcm-DTPA  aerosol  ventilation  images  in  patients  with 
excess  sputum  production.  NucI  Med  Commun  1990:1 1(81:557-563. 

33.  Webber  BA,  Hofmeyr  JL.  Morgan  MDL.  Hodson  ME.  Effects  of 
postural  drainage,  incorporating  the  forced  expiration  technique,  on 
pulmonary  function  in  cystic  fibrosis.  Br  J  Dis  Chest:  1986:80(4): 
353-359. 


40 


41 


34.  Verhoon  JM.  li.ikker  V\  .  Sleik  I'.l  I  lie  v.ihie  ol  the  forced  expiration 
technique  with  ami  without  postural  drainage  in  adults  with  cystic 
fibrosis.  Fur  J  Respir  Dis  1986:69(3):  169    174, 

35.  van  Hengstum  M.  Festen  J.  Beurskens  C.  Hankel  M.  Beckman  F. 
Corstens  F.  Conventional  physiotherapy  and  forced  expiration  ma- 
noeuvres have  similar  effects  on  tracheobronchial  clearance.  Eur 
Respir  J  I988:l(8):758-76l. 

36.  Hasani  A.  Pavia  D.  Agnew  JE.  Clarke  SW  Regional  iiuiciis  transport 
following  unproductive  cough  and  forced  expiration  technique  in 
patients  with  airways  obstruction.  Chest  1994:105(5):  1420-1425. 

37.  Sutton  PP.  Parker  RA.  Webber  BA.  Newman  SP.  Garland  N.  l.ope/.- 
Vidriero  MT.  et  al.  Assessment  of  the  forced  expiration  techniques, 
postural  drainage  and  directed  coughing  in  chest  physiotherapv  Eur 
J  Respir  Dis  1983:64(1  ):62-68. 

38.  Hofmeyr  JL,  Webber  BA.  Hodson  ME.  Evaluation  of  positive  ex- 
piratory pressure  as  an  adjunct  of  chest  physiotherapy  in  the  treat- 
ment of  cystic  fibrosis.  Thorax  I986;4I(  l2):95l-954. 

39.  Pryor  JA.  Webber  BA.  Hodson  ME.  Warner  JO.  The  Flutter  VRPl 
as  an  adjunct  to  chest  physiotherapy  in  cystic  fibrosis.  Respir  Med 
I994:8S(9):677-681. 

van  Hengstum  M,  Festen  J.  Beurskens  C.  Hankel  M.  van  den  Brock 
W.  Corstens  F.  No  effect  of  oral  high  frequency  oscillation  combined 
with  forced  expiratory  maneoeuvres  on  tracheobronchial  clearance 
in  chronic  bronchitis.  Eur  Respir  J  1990:3(1 ):  14- 1 8. 
Olseni  L.  Midgren  B.  Hornblad  Y.  Wollmer  P.  Chest  physiotherapy 
in  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease:  forced  expiratory  tech- 
nique combined  with  either  postural  drainage  or  positive  expiratory 
pressure  breathing.  Respir  Med  1994:88(61:435^140. 

42.  van  Hengstum  M.  Festen  J.  Beurskens  C.  Hankel  M.  Beekman  F. 
Corstens  F.  Effect  of  positive  expiratory  pressure  mask  physio- 
therapy (PEP)  versus  forced  expiration  technique  (FET/PD)  on 
regional  lung  clearance  in  chronic  bronchitis.  Eur  Respir  J  1991; 
4(6):65 1-654, 

43.  Wallis  C,  Prasad  A,  Who  needs  chest  physiotherapy?  Moving  from 
anecdote  to  evidence.  Arch  Dis  Child  l999;80(4):393-397, 

44.  Hess  DR,  The  evidence  for  secretion  clearance  techniques.  Respir 
Care  200l:46(  1 1  ):I276-I292. 

45.  Lange  P,  Nyboe  J,  Appleyard  M,  Jensen  G,  Schnohr  P,  Relation  of 
ventilatory  impairment  and  of  chronic  mucus  hypersecretion  to  mor- 
tality from  obstructive  lung  disease  and  Ironi  all  causes.  Thorax 
1990;45(8):579-585, 

46.  Vestbo  J,  Prescott  E.  Lange  P,  Association  of  chronic  mucus  hyper- 
secretion with  FEV,  decline  and  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  dis- 
ease mortality,  Copenhagen  City  Heart  Study  Group,  Am  J  Respir 
CritCare  Med  1996: 153(5): 1 5.30- 1, 535, 

47.  Mullen  JB,  Wright  L.  Wiggs  BR.  Pare  PD.  Hogg  JC.  Structure  of 
central  airways  in  current  smokers  and  ex-smokers  with  and  without 
mucus  hypersecretion:  relation  to  lung  function.  Thorax  1987:42(  1 1 ): 
84.3-848. 

48.  Maxwell  GM.  The  problem  ot  mucus  plugging  in  children  with 
asthma.  J  Asthma  I985;22(3);13l-I37. 

49.  Aikawa  T.  Shimura  S.  Sasaki  H.  Ebina  M.  Takishima  T.  Marked 
goblet  cell  hyperplasia  with  mucus  accumulation  in  the  airways  of 
patients  who  died  of  severe  acute  asthma  attack.  Chest  1992:101(4): 
916-921. 

50.  Ottenbacher  KJ.  Hinderer  SR.  Evidence-based  practice:  methods  to 
evaluate  individual  patient  improvement. Am  J  Phys  Med  Rchabil 
2(K)l;80(IO):786-796. 


Rfspir.viorv  Carf  •  }i\.\  2002  Voi  47  No  7 


785 


Positive  Pressure  Techniques  for  Airway  Clearance 


James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FA  ARC 


Introduction 

Definitions  of  Positive  Airway  Pressure 

Continuous  Positive  Airway  Pressure 

Expiratory  Positive  Airway  Pressure 

Positive  Expiratory  Pressure 
Types  of  Resistors 

Underwater  Seal 

Weighted  Ball 

Spring-Loaded  Valve 

Magnetic  Valve 

Fixed-Orifice  Resister 
Physiologic  Rationale  for  Positive  Airway  Pressure 
Administration  Techniques 
Administration  Considerations 
Aerosol  Administration 

Comparison  of  Flow,  and  Airway  and  Esophageal  Pressures 
Summary 

Positive  airway  pressure  (PAP)  has  been  used  since  the  193()s  to  improve  oxygenation,  increase  lung 
volumes  and  reduce  venous  return.  More  recently,  PAP  has  been  identified  as  an  effective  method 
of  splinting  airway  during  expiration,  improving  collateral  ventilation,  increasing  response  to  in- 
haled bronchodilators,  and  aiding  secretion  clearance  in  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis  and  chronic 
bronchitis.  A  range  of  devices,  administration  techniques,  and  evidence  supporting  their  clinical  use 
is  explored,  suggesting  that  PAP  is  equivalent  to  postural  drainage  in  the  clearance  of  secretions. 
PAP  produced  by  threshold  and  fixed  orifice  resistors  generate  different  characteristic  flow,  and 
airway  and  esophageal  pressure  patterns  that  may  contribute  to  different  physiologic  effects.  Fur- 
ther clinical  studies  are  required  to  better  understand  the  effects  of  these  differences.  Key  words: 
airway  clearance,  positive  airway  pressure,  continuous  positive  airway  pressure,  expiratory  positive 
airway  pressure,  positive  expiratory  pressure,  resistor.     [Respir  Care  2002;47(7):786-796] 


Introduction 

Positive  airway  pressure  (PAP)  is  an  effective  tool  in 
promoting  bronchial  hygiene.  Since  the  1930s,  positive 
airway  pressure  has  been  used  to  improve  oxygenation. 


James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  f-AARC  is  l-cllow  in  Respiratory  Science, 
Aerogen  Incorporated.  Mountain  View,  Calit'ornia  ■ 

Mr  Fink  presented  a  version  of  tiiis  report  at  the  17ih  Annual  New 
Horizons  Symposium  at  the  47th  International  Respiratory  Congress.  San 
Antonio.  Texas.  December  14.  2001. 

Correspondence:  James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  l-AARC,  Aerogen  Incorpo- 
rated, 2071  Stierlin  Court.  Mountain  View  CA  94043.  E-mail: 
jtmk@aerogen.com. 


increase  lung  volumes,  and  reduce  venous  return  in  pa- 
tients with  congestive  heart  failure.  More  recently,  posi- 
tive airway  pressure  for  mobilization  and  clearance  of  se- 
cretions has  captured  the  attention  of  the  cystic  fibrosis 
coniiiuinity,  and  a  growing  body  of  evidence  has  evolved 
to  support  its  use.  This  review  explores  how  PAP  is  gen- 
erated and  the  theoretical  and  empirical  basis  for  its  use  as 
a  secretion  clearance  technique. 

Definitions  of  Positive  Airway  Pressure 

As  defined  in  the  American  Association  for  Respiratory 
Care's  Clinical  Practice  Guideline.'  PAP  includes  contin- 
uous positive  airway  pressure  (CPAP).  positive  expiratory 


786 


Rfspiratorv  Care  •  Ji'i  v  2002  Voi.  47  No  7 


Posnivi;  PrhssurI'.  TixiiNiyuus  ior  Airway  C'LhARANCB 


Fig.  1 .  A.  During  forced  expiration  and  cough,  external  forces  com- 
press and  close  unstable  airways,  trapping  gas  and  reducing  the 
ability  to  expel  secretions.  B.  Positive  airway  pressure  splints  the 
airway  open  during  expiration,  reducing  air  trapping  and  improving 
expiratory  flow.  (From  Reference  7) 


pressure  (PEP),  and  expiratory  positive  airway  pressure 
(EPAP).  when  used  to  mobilize  secretions  and  treat  atel- 
ectasis. In  the  past  20  years  PAP  bronchial  hygiene  tech- 
niques ha\  e  emerged  as  effective  ahernatives  to  chest  phys- 
ical therapy  (CPT)  for  expanding  the  lungs  and  mobilizing 
secretions.  Evidence  suggests  that  PAP  therapy  is  more 
effectise  than  incentive  spirometry  and  intermittent  posi- 
tive-pressure breathing  (IPPB)  in  the  management  of  post- 
operati\e  atelectasis- '  and  enhances  the  benefits  of  aero- 
sol bronchodilalor delivery. ^^  Airway  clearance  techniques 
such  as  forced  expiratory  technique,  active  cycle  of  breath- 
ing, and  huff  are  essential  components  of  effective  PAP 
therapy. 

Positi\e  airway  pressure  should  be  differentiated  from 
IPPB  and  intermittent  positive-pressure  ventilation,  which 
are  techniques  of  providing  mechanical  \cnlilation.'' 
Though  PAP  can  occur  during  inspiration,  the  benefit  is 
derived  from  the  pressure  splinting  open  the  airway 
during  expiration,  increasing  both  lung  xiilumes  and 
flows  (Fii;.  1 ). 


Continuous  Positive  Airway  Pressure 

CPAF'  is  (he  ap|ilicalioM  of  posiiivc  airway  pressure  dur- 
ing both  inspiration  and  expiration  during  spontaneous 
breathing.  A  Ci^AP  system  consists  of  a  pressurized  circuit 
with  a  threshold  resistor  on  the  expiratory  limb.  CPAP 
maintains  a  consistent  baseline  airway  pressure  (5-20  cm 
H^O)  throughout  the  respiratory  cycle.  CPAP  systems  re- 
quire a  gas  How  greater  than  the  patient  inspiratory  (low  to 
maintain  the  desired  positi\e  airway  pressure. 

Expiratory  Positive  Airway  F'ressure 

Expiratory  positive  airway  pressure  applies  positive  pres- 
sure only  during  expiration.  Subatmospheric  pressures  are 
generated  on  inspiration,  and  positive  pressure  is  gener- 
ated during  expiration.  During  EPAP  therapy  the  patient 
exhales  against  a  threshold  reslster.  generating  a  preset 
pressure  of  .'S-20cm  H^O.  Expiratory  positive  airway  pres- 
sure devices  tend  to  be  less  complicated  and  less  expen- 
sive than  CPAP  systems,  not  requiring  a  high-flow  gas 
source. 

Positive  Expiratory  Pressure 

Positive  expiratory  pressure  is  generated  as  a  patient 
exhales  through  a  fixed-orifice  resistor,  generating  pres- 
sure of  10-20  cm  H,0  (although  therapeutic  use  of  pres- 
sures up  to  60  cm  H,0  have  been  reported  tt)  be  effective). 
The  fixed-orifice  resister  differentiates  PEP  from  EPAP 
and  CPAP.  The  fixed-orifice  resister  only  generates  pres- 
sure when  expiratory  flow  is  high  enough  to  generate  back 
pressure  from  the  orifice.  In  theory  the  threshold  resister 
does  not  produce  the  same  mechanical  or  physiological 
effects  as  a  fixed-orifice  resister.  but  further  study  is  re- 
quired to  determine  how  those  differences  affect  clinical 
outcome. 

Throughout  expiration  a  threshold  resistor  exerts  a  pre- 
dictable and  relatively  constant  force  on  the  expiratory 
limb  of  the  circuit.  When  the  force  is  applied  over  a  unit 
area  a  constant  threshold  pressure  is  established.  Pressure 
exceeding  the  threshold  opens  the  valve  and  allows  expi- 
ration, whereas  pressure  below  the  threshold  will  not  open 
the  valve.  Near  the  end  of  a  breath,  when  the  expiratory 
pressure  drops  below  the  threshold,  the  valve  closes,  seal- 
ing the  circuit  and  stopping  the  How  of  gas.  A  true  thresh- 
old resister  maintains  constant  pressure  in  the  circuit,  in- 
dependent of  changing  flow  rate. 

Types  of  Resistors 

Several  type  ot  resistors  are  used  to  generate  P.-XP  dur- 
ing expiration.  They  include: 

Underwater  Seal 

With  the  untlcrwater  seal  system  the  expiratory  limb  of 
the  circuit  is  submerecd  uniler  water.   The  heiiihl  ol  the 


Respiratory  Care  •  J  ley  2002  Voe  47  No  7 


787 


PosmvK  Pressure  Techniques  for  Airway  Clearance 


High 
Expiratory  Flow 


Moderate 

Expiratory  Flow 


No 
Expiratory  Flow 


A^ 

I 

o=H 

^>=\ 

'^  > 

^ 

,1 

\\ 

T 

f 

r  ■ 

cinH20 

o  • 

1^ 

s 

•V 

■ 

o 

.f 

1. 

.'-a 

Ld 



e 

W\ 

- 

'ym 


^ 


^j!l  j^  Jl 

Fig.  2.  Resistors  used  to  generate  positive  airway  pressure,  and 
the  impact  of  high,  moderate,  and  no  expiratory  flow  on  airway 
pressure.  Water  column  (A),  weighted  ball  (B),  and  spring-loaded 

(C)  are  threshold  resistors,  which  maintain  the  same  airway  pres- 
sure independent  of  flow  rate.  In  contrast,  the  fixed-orifice  resistor 

(D)  generates  pressure  that  correlates  directly  with  flow  rate.  (From 
Reference  8,  with  permission.) 


water  above  the  terminal  end  of  the  expiratory  limb  cor- 
responds to  the  threshold  pressure  generated  (Figure  2a). 
A  variant  of  the  underwater  seal  is  the  water  column  de- 
vice, in  which  the  threshold  pressure  is  generated  from  a 
column  of  water  above  a  diaphragm  directly  above  the 
expiratory  limb  of  the  circuit.  Pressure  in  the  circuit  must 
be  greater  than  the  pressure  of  the  water  to  raise  the  dia- 
phragm and  allow  gas  to  exit,  so  the  threshold  pressure  is 
a  product  of  the  water  column  height  and  the  surface  area 
of  the  diaphragm. 

Weighted  Ball 

With  the  weighted-ball  system  a  precision-ground  ball 
of  a  specific  weight  sits  above  a  calibrated  orifice  (imme- 
diately above  the  expiratory  limb  of  the  circuit)  in  a  hous- 
ing with  expiration  ports.  If  the  diameter  of  the  orifice  is 
not  the  narrowe.st  point  in  the  expiratory  limb  of  the  cir- 
cuit, the  weight  of  the  ball  determines  the  threshold  pres- 


sure. Weighted  ball  systems  require  nielicuk)us  attention 
to  vertical  orientation  to  maintain  consistent  pressure,  be- 
cause if  the  system  is  tilted  it  can  rattle  or  llutler  during 
expiration  (see  Fig.  2b). 

Spring-Loaded  Valve 

With  the  spring-loaded  \alve  system  a  spring  presses  a 
disc  or  diaphragm  dt)v\n  over  the  outlet  of  the  expiratory 
lintb  of  the  circuit.  The  force  of  the  spring  must  be  over- 
come for  the  disc  or  diaphragm  to  open  and  allow  gas  to 
exit.  The  functioning  of  the  spring-loaded  valve  is  inde- 
pendent of  position  or  vertical  orientation  (see  Fig.  2c). 

Magnetic  Valve 

With  the  magnetic  valve  device  a  bar  magnet  attracts  a 
magnetic  disc  to  seat  on  the  outlet  orifice.  As  the  pressure 
exceeds  the  attraction  of  the  magnet  the  disc  is  displaced, 
allowing  gas  to  exit.  The  greater  the  distance  between  the 
magnet  and  the  disk,  the  lower  the  pressure  required  for 
gas  to  leave  the  circuit. 

Fixed-Orifice  Resistor 

A  fixed-orifice  resistor  has  a  restricted  opening  of  a 
fixed  size  at  the  end  of  the  expiratory  limb.  As  gas  reaches 
the  restricted  orifice,  higher  fiow  increases  turbulence  and 
airway  resistance,  increasing  pressure  v\ithin  the  circuit. 
For  any  given  gas  flow,  the  smaller  the  orifice  the  higher 
the  pressure  generated.  The  expiratory  pressure  is  flow- 
dependent,  so  as  flow  decreases,  pressure  decreases.  With 
this  device  there  is  no  threshold  pressure  to  overcome 
before  gas  can  exit  the  system.  In  fact,  there  is  no  pressure 
generated  until  expiratory  flow  is  high  enough  to  create 
turbulence  on  exiting  through  the  orifice  (see  Fig.  2d). 

The  fixed-orifice  resistor  was  in  large  part  abandoned 
by  the  critical  care  community  20  years  ago  because  of 
concern  that  high  pressure  could  be  generated  w  ith  chang- 
ing flows  (eg.  coughing).  However,  the  pressure  generated 
with  a  fixed-orifice  resistor  during  a  cough  has  not  been 
shown  to  be  greater  than  that  of  a  normal  cough  against 
aclosed  glottis,  and  no  adverse  effects  have  been  associ- 
ated with  use  of  a  fixed-orifice  resistor. 

Physiologic  Rationale  for  Positi\e  Airway  Pressure 

As  an  instinctive  adaptation  to  disease,  pursed-lips 
breathing  represents  a  functional  predecessor  to  many  of 
our  modern  strategies  of  applying  positive  expiratory  pres- 
sure to  the  airway.  Pursed-lips  breathing  is  a  simple  pro- 
cedure that  many  chronic  obstructive  lung  disease  patients 
use  to  relieve  air  trapping  caused  by  collapse  of  unstable 
airways  during  expiration.  It  is  believed  that  the  resistance 
at  the  mouth  during  a  pursed-lips  exhalation  transmits  back 
pressure  that  splints  the  airways  open,  preventing  com- 


788 


Respiratory  Care  •  Julv  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


PosiTivK  Prhssure  Techniquus  for  Airway  Clearance 


pressiiin  and  pivnuiliirc  closiiiv.  whkli  is  ihc  same  jirinci- 
ple  of  operation  as  llic  rixod-oriricc  resistor."'" 

As  carlv  as  1Q36  iho  use  of  the  posili\e  pressure  mask 
for  treatment  ol'  congestive  heart  faikue  and  earcUogeiiie 
puhnonary  edema  was  described."  Barach  et  aP-  reported 
the  use  of  "continuous  positive  pressure  hreathing"  via 
mask  with  patients  suffering  from  respiratory  obstruction 
and  puhnonary  edema.  Imphcations  for  the  treatment  ot 
atelectasis  were  not  described  until  .^0  years  later,  when 
Cheney  et  al"  described  P_,(,_  imprcnements  after  applica- 
tion of  expiratory  resistance  in  anesthetized  patients  on 
mechanical  ventilation  and  speculated  that  this  was  caused 
by  reversing  aKeolar  collapse.  In  the  19(i()s  Ashbaugh  et 
al'-*  established  the  concept  of  positive  end-expiratory  pres- 
sure (PEEP)  as  a  technique  to  improve  oxygenation  in 
acute  respiratory  failure  and  acute  respiratory  distress  syn- 
drome. In  1^71  Gregory  et  al'"^  found  lower  mortality  from 
respiratory  distress  among  neonates  who  received  CPAP. 
PEEP  and  CPAP  reduce  the  alveolar-arterial  oxygen  dif- 
ference and  right-to-left  intrapulmonary  shunt,  increasing 
functional  residual  capacity  (FRC)  in  intubated  patients 
suffering  acute  respiratory  failure.'""* 

It  was  not  until  1979  that  PAP  was  suggested  to  have  a 
role  in  mobilization  of  secretions.  Andersen  et  al'''  dem- 
onstrated reintlation  of  collapsed  exci.sed  human  lungs  with 
CPAP  via  collateral  \  entilation,  suggesting  that  CPAP  "has 
a  potential  secretion  clearing  effect  in  that  pressure  is  built 
distal  to  an  obstruction." 

Andersen  and  Jespersen^"  then  made  castings  of  human 
lungs  and  identified  communications  between  interseg- 
mental respiratory  bronchioles,  concluding  that  collateral 
ventilation  might  be  important  in  normal  lung  function. 

Interest  in  CPAP  and  PEEP  for  lung  expansion  and 
mobilization  of  secretions  began  in  the  early  1980s.-'  -- 
Andersen  et  al--*  conducted  a  prospective,  randomized,  con- 
trolled clinical  trial,  using  a  sequential  analysis  design,  to 
determine  the  effect  of  conventional  therapy  versus  con- 
ventional therapy  plus  periodic  CPAP  via  mask,  in  the 
treatment  of  24  surgical  patients  with  atelectasis.  CPAP 
was  given  each  hour  for  25-35  breaths,  with  an  average 
pressure  of  15  cm  H^O.  At  12  hours,  patients  in  the  CPAP 
group  exhibited  significantly  greater  improvement  (P.,,,, 
and  radiographic  findings)  than  the  control  group. 

Soon  thereafter,  Pontoppidan  advocated  periodic  CPAP 
as  a  tool  for  treating  postoperative  pulmonary  complica- 
tions.-■*  Several  studies  during  the  early  1980s  explored  the 
application  of  various  methods  of  PEEP  and  CPAP  to 
nonintubated  patients, -'*^^"  including  comparisons  of  mask 
CPAP  to  incentive  spirometry,  and  of  deep  breathing  and 
coughing  to  IPPB,  with  various  results.  As  more  effective 
strategies  were  developed.  Stock  et  al-'*-'"  concluded  that 
intermittent  mask  CPAP  was  as  effective  as  incentive  spi- 
rometry or  deep  breathing  and  coughing  in  the  return  of 
pulmonary  function  following  thoracic  or  upper  abdomi- 


c 
E 


baseline     during        after         during        after 
PEP5cmH,0  PEP15cmH,0 

Fig.  3.  Thoracic  gas  volume  at  functional  residual  capacity  (solid 
bars)  and  at  total  lung  capacity  (shaded  bars)  at  baseline  and 
during  and  after  2  minutes  of  breathing  with  positive  expiratory 
pressure  (PEP)  (generated  with  a  spring-loaded  threshold  resistor) 
of  5  and  15  cm  I-I2O.  Functional  residual  capacity  and  total  lung 
capacity  increase  from  baseline  during  therapy  with  both  pres- 
sures, returning  to  baseline  after  therapy.  (From  Reference  35, 
with  permission.) 


nal  surgery.  Additionally,  they  suggested  that  mask  CPAP 
might  be  preferable,  as  it  requires  less  effort  and  is  pain- 
less. 

Ricksten  et  al'  performed  a  randomized  comparative 
study  of  43  upper-abdominal-surgery  patients.  They  com- 
pared postoperative  complications,  alveolar-arterial  oxy- 
gen difference,  peak  expiratory  flow,  and  forced  vital  ca- 
pacity (FVC)  in  a  control  group  of  patients  using  incentive 
spirometry  and  a  group  using  either  CPAP  or  PEP.  All  3 
groups  took  30  breaths  each  hour  while  awake,  for  3  days 
postoperatively.  Although  change  in  peak  flow  was  not 
different  between  the  groups,  FVC  was  greater  in  the  CPAP 
and  PEP  groups.  The  alveolar-arterial  oxygen  difference 
increased  uniformly  for  all  groups  for  the  first  24  hours, 
but  then  decreased  in  the  CPAP  and  PEP  groups  (being 
insignificantly  lower  in  the  PEP  group).  Atelectasis  was 
observed  in  6  of  15  patients  in  the  control  group.  1  of  13 


Respirator"*'  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


789 


Positive  Prhssure  Techniques  for  Aikw  a-i  Clearance 


P  =  0.04 


O  9S% 

90% 

75% 


soy. 

Mean 


FEF  25-75 


25% 

10% 
5% 


Confidence 
Intervals 


Fig.  4.  Change  in  percent  of  predicted  for  forced  vital  capacity  (FVC).  forced  expiratory  volume  in  the  first  second  (FEV,).  and  forced 
expiratory  flow  during  the  middle  half  of  the  forced  vital  capacity  (FE\/25_75)  over  a  12-month  period.  Shaded  bars  represent  a  group  of 
patients  who  received  postural  drainage  and  percussion.  Clear  bars  represent  a  group  of  patients  who  received  positive  expiratory  pressure 
physiotherapy.  (From  Reference  37,  with  permission.) 


in  the  CPAP  group,  and  0  ot  \f<  in  the  PEP  group.  The 
authors  concluded  that  periodic  PEP  and  CPAP  are  supe- 
rior to  deep  breathing  exercises  with  respect  to  impro\ing 
gas  exchange,  preserving  lung  volumes,  and  pre\enting 
postoperative  atelectasis  after  upper  abdominal  surgery. 
They  also  concluded  that  "the  simple  and  commercially 
available  PEP  mask  is  as  effective  as  the  more  compli- 
cated CPAP  system."  A  simple  PEP  system  certainly  rep- 
resents a  cost  savings  o\er  the  use  of  a  more  complex 
CPAP  system,  which  requires  a  gas  flow  that  will  not 
change  the  fraction  of  inspired  oxygen  (F|,)  )  in  response 
to  back  pressure,  pressure  monitor,  and  oxygen  analyzer. 
Lindner  et  al."  in  a  randomized  study  of  34  upper- 
abdominal  surgery  patients,  compared  postoperative  phys- 
iotherapy and  postoperative  physiotherapy  plus  mask 
CPAP.  They  found  that  the  group  treated  u  iih  physiother- 
apy plus  CPAP  had  a  more  rapid  recovery  of  vital  capacity 
and  FRC,  and  fewer  pulmonary  complications.  Campbell 
et  aP-  randomized  71  abdominal  surgcr\  patients  into  2 
groups.  Group  I  did  breathing  exercises  and  huff  cough- 
ing. Group  2  did  breathing  exercises  and  huff  coughing 
plus  PAP  (w  ith  a  water  column  ihreshold  resistor  adjusted 
to  produce  pressures  of  .'i-l.'S  cm  Hi().  with  the  patient 
exhaling  through  a  mouihpicce).  There  were  no  differ- 
ences in  pulmonary  function  between  the  2  groups,  and  the 
incidence  of  respiratory  complications  was  31%  in  group 
1  and  22'7f  in  group  2.  which  was  not  statistically  signif- 
icant. The  authors  concluded  that  PHP  coukl  serve  as  an 
adjunct  to  routine  CPT.  particularly  with  postoperative 
smokers,  in  that  43'f  of  the  smokers  in  ilieir  suuK  devel- 


oped respiratory  complications,  compared  to  none  of  the 
nonsmokers  (p  <  0.01). 

By  preventing  expiratory  collapse.  PEP  is  thought  to 
facilitate  a  more  homogenous  distribution  of  ventilation 
throughout  the  lung,  via  the  collateral  interbronchiolar  chan- 
nels." Groth  et  al'^  measured  lung  function  from  the  ex- 
piratory port  of  the  PEP  mask  with  12  CF  patients  and 
found  a  significant  change  in  FRC  (p  <  0.02),  less  trapped 
gas  (p  <  0.05).  and  less  washout  volume  (p  <  0.05)  than 
pretreatment  measurements.  They  concluded  that  the 
changes  were  attributable  to  more  even  lung  distribution 
of  ventilation  and  opening  of  airways  that  were  otherwise 
closed  off  during  normal  ventilation.  In  contrast,  van  der 
Schans  et  a.\-  reported  that  use  of  a  5  and  1 5  cm  H^O  thresh- 
old resistor  for  2  minutes  increased  FRC  from  2.6  to  3.6  and 
4.4  L.  respectivelv.  and  an  increase  in  total  lung  capacity 
from  .^.1  to  >})  and  6.9  L  (Fig.  3).  These  lung  volumes 
leturned  to  baseline  immediaiely.  They  also  found  that  use  of 
a  threshold  resistor  did  not  intluence  mucus  clearance. 

Because  the  patient  must  breathe  down  to  subatmospheric 
pressures  on  inspiration,  both  EPAP  and  PEP  are  believed 
to  impose  a  higher  w  i)rk  of  breathing  than  CPAP.  Van  der 
.Schans  et  al "'  examined  the  effect  of  EPAP  w  iih  .^  cm  H-,0 
using  a  threshold  resistor  (Vital  Signs.  Towtowa.  New 
Jersev )  with  S  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease  pa- 
tients, measuring  w  ork  of  breathing  and  myoelectrical  ac- 
liviiv  of  the  scalene,  parasternal,  and  abdominal  muscles. 
During  HP.'XP  breathing  at  rest,  mean  specitic  work  of 
breathing  increased  from  0.54  J/L  to  1.08  J/L.  expired 
niiniite  volume  decreased  from  12.4  L/min  to  10.5  L/min. 


790 


Respirator'i  Care  •  Jily  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Positive  Pressure  Techniques  for  Airway  Clearance 


Rotating  Cap  with  4  orifices 


Orifice  on  cap  aligns 
with  exit  port  on  body 


One-way  valves 


One-way  vaJves 


Fig.  5.  Two  commercially  available  positive  expiratory  pressure 
devices.  Above:  Resistex,  (Mercury  Medical.  Clearwater,  Florida). 
Below:  TheraPEP  (DHD  Healthcare,  Wampsville,  New  York).  (From 
Reference  8.  with  permission.) 


and  the  ratio  of  dead-space  volume  to  tidal  volume  de- 
creased from  0.39  to  0.34.  Phasic  respiratory  muscle  ac- 
tivity increased  with  EPAP.  Dyspnea  sensation  during  ex- 
ercise test  was  hicher  than  durins:  the  test  with  undisturbed 


hrcalhing.  It  is  unclear  sshclhcr  the  llxcel-orificc  resistor. 
more  coninn)nly  associated  with  PEP.  would  hn\  o  the  same 
effect. 

Mcllwainc  ct  aP'  randomly  assigned  40  patients,  ages 
6-17  years,  to  perform  CPT  or  PEP  therapy  for  a  I -year 
period.  CPT  consisted  of  5-6  postural  drainage  positions, 
with  percussion  for  3-5  min  each,  tollowcd  hy  deep  breath- 
ing exercises  combined  with  vibration  on  expiration,  forced 
expirations,  and  vigorous  coughing.  These  30-min  ses- 
sions were  done  twice  daily.  PEP  was  performed  with  a 
fixed-orifice  resistor  (Astra  Meditec,  Lund.  Sweden).  With 
the  patient  in  a  sitting  position,  1 5  tidal  breaths  with  slightly 
active  expiration  were  taken  through  the  device  (approx- 
imately every  2  min).  The  patient  then  performed  2-3 
forced  expiratory  technique  maneuvers,  followed  by  cough, 
and  a  1-2  min  period  of  relaxed,  controlled  breathing.  This 
sequence  was  repeated  6  times  in  a  2()-min  session.  In  the 
CPT  group  all  the  pulmonary  function  variables  declined, 
whereas  the  PEP  group  had  positive  changes  in  FEV,  (p  = 
0.02)  and  FVC  (p  =  0.02)  (Fig.  4).  Reisman  et  al'»  re- 
ported a  rate  of  decline  similar  to  that  experienced  by  the 
CPT  group  (FEV,  -1.9%  of  predicted  per  year).  The  PEP 
group  improved  from  baseline  in  FVC  (+6.57%).  FEV, 
(-1-5.98%).  and  forced  expiratory  flow  during  the  middle 
half  of  the  forced  vital  capacity  (  +  3.3%).  That  was  the 
most  convincing  study  to  date  that  PEP  may  be  superior  to 
standard  CPT. 

Administration  Techniques 

Equipment  for  PEP  therapy  consists  of  a  soft,  transpar- 
ent, hand  ventilation  mask  or  mouthpiece.  T  as.sembly  with 
a  one-way  valve,  a  variety  of  fixed-orifice  resistors  (or 
adjustable  expiratory  resistor),  and  a  manometer  (Figs.  5. 
6.  and  7).  The  mask  is  applied  tightly  but  comfortably  over 
the  mouth  and  nose.  A  mouthpiece  can  be  used  only  if  the 
patient  can  maintain  a  reasonable  seal  and  not  release  air 
through  the  nose  during  the  maneuvers.  PEP  therapy  is 
typically  performed  with  the  subject  seated  comfortably, 
with  elbows  resting  on  a  table.  The  subject  is  instructed  to 
relax  while  performing  diaphragmatic  breathing,  inspiring 
a  volume  of  air  larger  than  normal  tidal  volume  but  not 
to  total  lung  capacity,  through  ihc  l-wa\  nuInc.  Exha- 
lation to  FRC  is  active  but  not  forced,  through  the  re- 
sistor chosen  to  achieve  a  PAP  of  10-20  cm  H^O  during 
exhalation  (Table  1 ). 

A  series  of  10-20  breaths  are  performed  with  the  mask 
or  mouthpiece  in  place.  The  mask  (or  mouthpiece)  is  then 
removed,  and  the  individual  performs  several  directed 
coughs  to  raise  secretions.  This  sequence  of  10-20  PAP 
breaths,  followed  by  huff  or  forced  expiratory  technique  is 


Respiratory  Care  •  }vl\  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


791 


Posnivi:  Prkssurr  THcnNigui;s  i-ok  Aikvvav  Clearance 


EXPIRATORY  RESISTOR 
4  SETTINGS 


OR 


MOUTHPIECE, 


AEROSOL  TUBING  (oplional) 


Fig.  6.  Equipment  tor  positive  expiratory  pressure  thierapy.  (From  Reference  7) 


repeated  4-6  times  per  PEP  therapy  session.  Each  session 
for  bronchial  hygiene  takes  10-20  min  and  may  be  per- 
formed 1 — \-  times  a  day.  as  needed.  For  lung  e.\pansion. 
patients  should  be  encouraged  to  take  10-20  breaths  every 
hour  while  awake. 

Administration  Considerations 

Selecting  an  appropriate  resistor  with  the  right  orifice 
size  is  critical  for  effective  therapy.  The  goal  is  to  achieve 
a  positive  expiratory  pressure  of  10-20  cm  H-,0.  with  an 
inspiration-expiration  ratio  of  1 :3  to  1 :4.  Commonly,  adults 
achieve  that  pressure  range  with  a  tlow-restricting  orifice 
of  2.5 — 1.0  mm  in  diamclcr.  The  proper  resistor  helps  pro- 
duce the  desired  inspiration-expiration  ratio  of  1:3  to  1:4. 
An  in-line  manometer  can  measure  the  expiratory  pressure 
to  select  the  appropriate  orillce  si/e.  Once  the  proper  re- 
sistor orifice  (that  generates  peak  pressures  of  10-20  cm 
H2O)  has  been  determined,  the  manometer  may  be  re- 
moved from  the  system.  A  resistor  with  too  large  an  orifice 
produces  a  short  exhalation  and  fails  to  achieve  the  proper 
expiratory  pressure.  With  too  small  an  orifice  the  expira- 
tory phase  is  longer,  pressure  can  increase  to  above  20  cm 
H,0.  and  the  work  of  breathing  may  he  increased.  PEP 


Fig.  7.  AeroPEP  Plus  is  a  valved  holding  chamber  designed  to 
combine  aerosol  therapy  from  a  pressunzed  metered-dose  Inhaler 
with  a  f Ixed-orif Ice  resistor.  (Courtesy  of  Monaghan  Medical.  Platts- 
burgh.  New  York.) 


sessions  lasting  more  than  20  min  ma\  cause  fatigue.  Dur- 
ing exacerbations.  indi\iduals  are  encouraged  to  increase 
Ihe  fh'cjiiency  of  PEP  rather  than  extending  the  length  of 
individual  sessions. 

Aerosol  Administration 

Positive  expiratory  pressure  and  aerosol  therapy  done 
simultaneously,  either  by  hand-held  nebuli/cr  or  metered- 
dose  inhaler  (MDI).  can  improve  the  response  to  the  bron- 
chodilator.  In  a  randomized  crossover  studs   with  S  pa- 

Tahle  1.       Procedure  for  Administration  of  Positive  Airway  Pressure 

1.  Explain  Ihat  P.AP  tfierapy  is  used  to  re-expand  lung  tis>ue  and  fielp 
mohilize  secretions. 

Palienls  should  also  he  taught  to  pert'orni  the  huff. 

2.  Instruct  the  patient  to: 
(a)  Sit  comfortably. 

lb)  If  using  a  mask,  apply  it  tightly  but  comfortably  over  the  nose 
and  mouth.  If  a  mouthpiece  is  used,  place  lips  Urmly  around  it 
and  breath  through  the  mouth. 

(c)  Take  in  a  breath  that  is  larger  than  normal,  but  don'i  fill  the 
lungs  completely. 

id)  Exhale  actively,  but  noi  forcel'ull>.  creating  a  PAP  of  10-2(1  cm 
H,0  during  exhalation  (determined  with  manometer  during 
initial  Iherapy  sessions).  The  inhalation  should  be  approximately 
1/.^  of  the  total  breathing  cycle  (ie.  inspiration-expiration  ratio 
\:M. 

(e)  Perform  1()-2U  brealhs. 

(f)  Remove  the  mask  or  mouthpiece  and  perform  2-}  hulls  and 
then  rest  as  needed. 

(g)  Repeat  above  cycle  4-8  limes,  not  to  exceed  20  minutes, 
(h)  When  patients  are  also  receiving  bronchodilator  aerosol, 

administer  in  conjunction  with  PAP  Iherapy  by  placing  a 
holding  chamber/MDI  or  nebulizer  at  the  inspiratory  port  of  the 
PAP  device. 


PAP  -  poMti\c  airvsay  pressure 
MDI  =  mclcrcd-ilosc  inhaler 


792 


Risi'iRATORV  Care*  JiLY  2002  Voi,  47  No  7 


PosiiiM   I'ki  ssi'Ri-  Ti:ctiNiyui;s  ior  AlK\vA^  Ci  iaranci-: 


Threshold  Resistor 


Flutter  Valve 


Fixed  Orifice  Resistor 


High  Flow 

Gas  Source 

Oxygen  or 

Air 


TUT 


CPAP 


EPAP 


Flutter 


PEP 


Fig.  8.  Comparison  of  airway  pressure  waveforms  generated  with  continuous  positive  airway  pressure  (CPAP),  expiratory  positive  airway 
pressure  (EPAP),  weighted  ball  threshold  resistor  (Flutter),  and  fixed-orifice  resistor  positive  expiratory  pressure  (PEP)  devices.  (From 
Reference  8,  with  permission.) 


Fig.  9.  Flow  (upper  curve)  and  airway  pressure  and  esophageal  pressure  (lower  curve)  during  normal  tidal  breathing,  measured  with  a 
pneumotachometer  placed  at  the  airway  and  using  a  VenTrak  monitor. 


tients  .sultering  severe  broncho.spasm,  PEEP  was  applied 
via  face  mask  while  administering  nebulized  bronchodila- 
tors,-"  Each  patient  had  2  PEEP  treatments  and  2  control 
treatments  (with  zero  end-expiratory  pressure)  at  intervals 
of  3  hours  between  each  treatment.  FEV,.  FVC.  and  peak 
flow  improved  significantly  following  PEEP  treatments 
(p  <  0.03).  PEEP  improved  the  efficacy  of  bronchodilator 
administration,  possibly  because  of  better  distribution  to 
the  peripheral  airways. 

Similar  results  were  found  when  PEP  was  applicil  in 
conjunction  with  /B,  agonists  administered  via  MDl  with 


spacer.  In  a  randomized  crossover  study.  S  patients  alter- 
nately received  treatments  of  2  puffs  ot  lerbutaline  via 
MDI  without  PEP.  terhulaline  via  MDl  with  PEP.  and 
placebo  via  MDl  w ith  PEP.^  The  results  showed  improve- 
ment in  peak  expiratory  How  (p  <  ().()()()  1). 

Conditions  such  as  sinusitis,  ear  infection,  epistaxis.  or 
recent  facial,  oral,  or  skull  injury  or  surgery  should  be 
carefully  evaluated  before  a  decision  is  made  to  iinliate 
PEP  mask  therapy.  Patients  who  arc  e\|iericncing  active 
hemoptv sis  or  those  with  unrcsolvetl  pncumolhoiax  should 
avoid  PAP  iherapv  until  those  acule  pulinonarv  prohlems 


Respiratory  Care  •  Jut  v  2002  Voi  47  No  7 


793 


Positive  Pressure  Techniques  iok  Aikwa'i'  Clearance 


80-r 


-R4- 


Fig.  10.  Flow  (upper  curve)  and  airway  pressure  and  esophageal  pressure  (lower  curve)  while  breathing  through  a  spring-loaded  threshold 
resistor  (Vital  Signs)  with  a  10  cm  HjO  valve. 


Fig.  11.  Flow  (upper  curve)  and  airway  pressure  and  esophageal  pressure  (lower  curve)  while  breathing  through  a  fixed-orifice  resistor 
(TheraPEP). 


have  resolved.  Though  barotraunia  and  hemodynamic  com-  has  been  used  for  lung  e.xpansion  or  secretion  clearance,  in 

promise  are  possible  with  the  use  of  positive  pressure,  no  large  part  because  of  the  techniques  in\ dived  in  the  ther- 

complications  have  been  reported  when  PEP  mask  therapy  apy  and  the  patient  population. 


794 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


PosiriM   Pri  ssiiRi  Ti ciiNiyn  s  ior  Airway  Ci.i;.\r.\nci-; 


Comparison  of  Flow,  and  Airway  and  Esophageal 
Pressures 

To  clarity  terms  to  ttescribe  PAP  options,  Pijzuie  S  shows 
the  difference  in  pressure  patterns  generated  with  CPAP.  EPAP 
(tiireshoid  resistors),  and  PHP  with  a  nxed-orifice  resistor. 

To  better  understand  the  relative  effects  of  these  devices,  a 
normal  volunteer,  with  an  esophageal  balloon  in  place,  was 
asked  to  breathe  (in  accordance  v\ith  manufacturer  instruc- 
tions) through  a  variety  of  devices.  Airway  pressures  and 
flows  were  determined  with  a  pneumotachometer  placed  at 
the  airway  using  a  VenTrak  monitor  (No\ametri\.  Connect- 
icut). The  upper  panel  represents  flow  ami  the  lower  |ianel 
shows  airway  anil  esophageal  pressure. 

Normal  tidal  breathing  (Fig.  9)  shows  a  peak  expiratory 
flow  of  35  L/min,  with  an  inspiratory  flow  of  30  L/min. 
Airway  pressure  fluctuates  from  atmospheric  baseline  by 
<  1  cm  H,0.  Esophageal  pressures  are  subatmospheric. 
with  tidal  changes  of  -6  to  -12  cm  H^O;  minor  rhythmic 
fluctuations  of  0.5-2.0  cm  H2O  occur  at  a  rate  of  64/min 
and  correlate  with  the  subject's  heart  rate. 

The  spring-loaded  threshold  resistor  (recorded  using  a 
Vital  Signs  10  cm  H-,0  valve)  generates  a  distinct  breath- 
ing pattern.  As  expected  with  a  threshold  resistor,  expira- 
tory flow  appears  unrestricted  at  40  L/min.  with  a  square 
wave  pattern  and  prolonged  expiration.  Inspiration  time  is 
similar  but  flows  are  higher.  The  airway  pressure  peaks 
and  maintains  a  plateau  until  exhalation  begins  (square 
wave),  and  esophageal  pressure  equalizes  with  airway  pres- 
sure early  in  the  expiratory  phase.  As  active  exhalation 
continues  past  1.5-2.0  s.  esophageal  pressure  increases 
above  airway  pressure  by  as  much  as  8-10  cm  H^O  (Fig.  10). 

A  fixed-oriflce  resistor  (TheraPEP.  DHD  Healthcare. 
Wampsville,  New  York)  (Fig.  1 1)  restricts  expiratory  flow 
to  <  20  L/min,  correlating  to  an  airway  pressure  peak  of 
10  cm  HiO.  Airway  pressure  decreases  with  the  expiratory 
flow,  with  both  returning  to  baseline  prior  to  the  next 
breath.  The  esophageal  pressure  is  nonnal  on  inspiration 
but  increases  to  positive  during  expiration,  remaining  con- 
sistent to  the  last  0.5  s.  reducing  with  reduced  flow.  During 
a  prolonged  active  expiration  against  a  smaller  orifice, 
esophageal  pressure  steadily  increa.ses  with  time  and  may 
exceed  airway  pressure  by  the  end  of  the  breath. 

It  is  clear  from  these  waveforms  that  each  method  of 
generating  PAP  generates  a  different  correlation  of  flows 
and  airway  and  esophageal  pressure  patterns.  Further  stud- 
ies are  required  to  better  understand  the  differences  in 
effect  with  these  3  modalities. 

Summary 

Positive  airv\ay  pressure,  generated  as  CPAP.  EPAP 
and  PEP  has  been  shown  to  increase  hnig  volumes,  im- 
prove bronchodilator  response,  and  im[iro\e  secretion  clear- 


ance similar  to  postmal  drainage,  when  combined  with 
PET  or  active  cycle  of  breathing.  l-!\|iiralory  positive  air- 
way pressure  and  PEP  devices  lend  to  be  inexpensive  and 
lequirc  considerably  less  time  anil  physical  acconnnoda- 
tion  lor  |iroper  use  than  postuial  tirainage.  and  may  be 
more  readily  accessible  lor  ihe  palicnl  Ui  iiilcgralc  into  his 
or  hei"  dailv  life. 


RKKKRKNCKS 

1  .American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care.  AARC  Clinical  Prac- 
iicc  Guideline:  Use  of  positive  airway  pressure  adjuncts  to  bronchial 
liyt^iene  therapy.  Respir  Care  I9y.^:.18(.'5):.'il6-52l. 

2.  Paul  WL.  Downs  JB.  Postoperative  atelectasis:  intermittent  positive 
pressure  breathing,  incentive  spirometry,  and  lace-mask  positive  end- 
expiratory  pressure.  Arch  .Suri;  l')Si;l  lfi(7l:S61-S(i.^. 

.V  Ricksten  SE.  Benjilsson  A.  .Soderberg  C.  Thorden  M.  Kvisl  H.  Ef- 
fects of  periodic  positive  airway  pressure  by  mask  on  postoperative 
pulmonary  function.  Chest  iy86;X9(6);774-781. 

4.  Andersen  JB.  Klausen  NO.  A  new  mode  of  administration  of  ncb- 
uh/ed  bronchodilator  in  severe  hronchospasm,  Eur  J  Respir  D\s 
.SuppI  1982:119:97-10(1. 

5.  Fri.schknecht-Christensen  E.  Norregaard  O.  Dahl  R.  Treatment  of 
bronchial  asthma  with  terbutaline  inhaled  by  conespacer  com- 
bined with  positive  expiratory  pressure  mask.  Chest  1991:100(2): 
}  1  7-.^2  I . 

6.  Kacinarek  RM.  Dimas  S.  Reynolds  J.  Shapiro  BA.  Technical  aspects 
of  positive  end  expiratory  pressure  (PEEP).  Part  I.  Physics  of  PEEP 
devices.  Respir  Care  I982:27(  I2):I478-I489. 

7.  Mahlmeister  MJ.  Fink  JB.  Hoffman  GL.  Filer  LF.  Positive-expi- 
ratory-pressure mask  therapy:  theoretical  and  practical  consider- 
ations and  a  review  of  the  literature.  Respir  Care  1991  :.16(  1 1 1: 
I2I8-I2.W. 

8.  Fink  JB.  Bronchial  hygiene  and  lung  expansion.  In:  Fink  JB.  Hunt 
GE.  editors.  Clinical  practice  in  respiratory  care.  Philadelphia:  Lip- 
pmcott  Williams  &  Wilkms:  1999. 

9.  Thoman  RL,  Stoker  GL.  Ross  JC.  The  efficacy  of  pursed-lips  breath- 
ing in  patients  with  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease.  Am  Rev 
Respir  Dis  I966:9.1(  1 ):  100-106. 

10.  Petty  TL.  Chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease.  New  York:  Marcel 
Dekker:  1978. 

1 1.  Poulton  HP.  Odon  DM.  Leil-sided  heart  lailure  wuh  pulmonary  oe- 
dema: its  treatment  with  the  "pulmonary  plus  pressure  machine." 
Lancet  1936;231:981-983. 

1 2.  Barach  AL,  Martin  J.  Eckman  L.  Positive  pressure  respiratuni  and  its 
application  to  the  treatment  of  acute  pulmonary  edema  and  respira- 
tory obstruction.  Proc  Am  Soc  Clin  Invest  l937:l(i:Wi4-(i80. 

13.  Cheney  FW.  Hornbein  TF.  Crawford  EW.  The  effect  of  expiratory 
resistance  on  the  blood  gas  tensions  of  anesthetized  patients.  Anes- 
thesiology l967:28(4):67()-f)76. 

14.  Ashbaugh  DG.  Petty  TL.  Bigelow  DB.  Harris  IM.  Continuous  pos- 
itive pressure  breathing  (CPPB)  in  adult  respiratory  distress  syn- 
drome. J  Thorac  Cardiovasc  Surg  I969;.'i7(  l):3l-»l 

l.'i.  Gregory  GA.  Kilterman  JA.  Phibbs  RH,  Tooley  WH.  Hamilton  WK. 
Treatment  of  Ihe  idiopathic  respiratory  distress  syndrome  with  con- 
tinuous positive  airway  pressure.  N  Eng  J  Med  1971 :2X4( 24):  1333- 
1 340. 

\(i.  Pontoppidan  H.  Wilson  RS.  Rie  MA.  Schneider  RC.  Respiratory 
intensive  care.  Anesthesiology  I977:47(2):96-1 16. 

17.  Km/.  J  a.  PEEP  and  CPAP  in  perioperative  respiratory  care.  Respir 
Care  1984:29(6):6l4-624;  discussion  624-629. 


Respir.-xtory  Carf,  •  Ji  L^  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


795 


Positive  Pressure  Techniques  for  Airway  Clearance 


1 8.  Garrard  CS,  Shah  M.  The  effects  of  expiratory  positive  airway  pres- 
sure on  function  residual  capacity  in  normal  subjects.  Grit  Care  Med 
|y7S;6(5|:32()-33:. 

I').  Andersen  JB.  Qvist  H.  Kann  T.  Recruilinj;  collapsed  lung  through 
collateral  channels  with  positive  end-expiratory  pressure.  Scan  J  Re- 
spir  Dis  l979;6()(.'i):2W)-:66. 

20.  Andersen  JB,  Jespersen  W.  Demonstration  of  intersegmental  respi- 
ratory bronchioles  in  normal  lungs.  Eur  J  Respir  Dis  1 980:61  (6): 
337-341. 

21.  Branson  RD.  Hurst  JM,  DeHaven  CB.  Mask  CPAP:  stale  of  the  art. 
Respir  Care  I985;30(  10):846-857. 

22.  Branson  RD.  PEEP  without  endotracheal  intubation.  Respir  Care 
|y88;33(7):59S-610. 

23.  Andersen  JB.  Olesen  KP.  Eikard  E.  Jansen  E.  Qvist  J.  Periodic 
continuous  positive  airway  pressure.  CPAP,  by  mask  in  the  treatment 
of  atelectasis:  a  sequential  analysis.  Eur  J  Respir  Dis  1 980:6 1 :20-25. 

24.  Pontoppidan  H.  Mechanical  aids  to  lung  expansion  in  nonintubated 
surgical  patients.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  1980:122(5  Pt  2):109-119. 

25.  Carlsson  C,  Sonden  B,  Thylen  U.  Can  postoperative  continuous 
positive  airway  pressure  (CPAP)  prevent  pulmonary  complications 
after  abdominal  surgery?  Intensive  Care  Med  1981:7(5):225-229. 

26.  Martin  JG.  Shore  S,  Engel  LA.  Effect  of  continuous  positive  pressure 
on  respiratory  mechanics  and  pattern  of  breathing  in  induced  asthma. 
Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  I982:126(5):8I2-817. 

27.  Stock  MC.  Downs  JB.  Administration  of  continuous  positive  airway 
pressure  by  mask.  Acute  Care  1983/84:10(3-4):184-188, 

28.  Stock  MC,  Downs  JB,  Corkran  ML,  Pulmonary  function  before  and 
after  prolonged  continuous  positive  airway  pressure  by  mask.  Crit 
Care  Med  1984:12(  1 1  ):973-974. 

29.  Stock  MC.  Downs  JB.  Cooper  RB,  Lebenson  IM,  Cleveland  J,  Weaver 
DE,  et  al.  Comparison  of  continuous  positive  airway  pressure,  in- 
centive spirometry,  and  conservative  therapy  after  cardiac  opera- 
tions. Crit  Care  Med  1984:12(1 1):969-972. 


30.  Stock  MC,  Downs  JB.  Gauer  PK.  Alster  JM,  Imrey  PB.  Prevention 
of  postoperative  pulmonary  complication  with  CPAP,  incentive  spi- 
rometry and  conservative  therapy.  Chest  1985:87(2):I51-I57. 

3 1 .  Lindner  KH,  Lotz  P,  Ahneleld  FW.  Continuous  positive  airway  pres- 
sure effect  on  functional  residual  capacity,  vital  capacit>  and  its 
subdivisions.  Chest  1987:92(  1 166-7(), 

32.  Campbell  T.  Ferguson  N.  McKinlay  RGC.  The  use  of  a  simple 
self-administered  method  of  positive  expiratory  pressure  (PEP)  in 
chest  physiotherapy  alter  abdominal  surger\.  Physiotherapy  1986: 
72:498-500. 

33.  Frolund  L.  Madsen  F.  Self-administered  prophylactic  postoperative 
positive  expiratory  pressure  in  thoracic  surgery.  Acta  Anaesthesiol 
Scand  1986:30(5):38 1-385. 

34.  Groth  S,  Stafanger  G.  Dirksen  H,  Andersen  JB.  Falk  M,  Kelstrup  M. 
Positive  expiratory  pressure  (PEP  maski  physiotherapy  improves 
ventilation  and  reduces  volume  of  trapped  gas  in  cystic  fibrosis.  Bull 
Eur  Physiopathol  Respir  l985:2l(4l:339-.343. 

35.  van  der  Schans  CP.  van  der  Mark  TW.  de  Vries  G,  Piers  DA,  Beekhuis 
H,  Danken-Roelse  JE.  et  al.  Effect  of  positive  expiratory  pressure 
breathing  in  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis.  Thorax  1991:46(4):252- 
256. 

36.  van  der  Schans  CP.  de  Jong  W,  de  Vries  G.  Kaan  WA.  Postma  DS, 
Koeter  GH,  van  der  Mark  TW.  Effects  of  positive  expiratory  pres- 
sure breathing  during  exercise  in  patients  with  COPD.  Chest  1994: 
105(3):782-789. 

37.  Mcllwaine  PM.  Wong  LT.  Peacock  D,  Davidson  AG.  Long-term 
comparative  trial  of  conventional  postural  drainage  and  percussion 
versus  positive  expiratory  pressure  physiotherapv  in  the  treatment  of 
cystic  fibrosis.  J.  Pediatr  1997:131(41:570-574. 

38.  Reisman  JJ,  Rivington-Law  B,  Corey  M,  Marcotte  J,  Wannamaker 
E,  Harcourt  D,  Levison  H.  Role  of  conventional  physiotherpay  in 
cystic  fibrosis.  J  Pediatr  1988:1 13(4):632-636. 


796 


Respirators  Care  •  }il\  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


High-Frequency  Oscillation  of  the  Airway  and  Chest  Wall 

James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FAARC  and  Michael  J  Mahlmeister  MSc  RRT 


Introduction 

Deflnition 

High  Frequency  Airway  Oscillation  Devices 

Flutter  Valve 
Intermittent  Percussive  Ventilation  (The  Percussionator) 
Hij;h-Frequency  External  Chest  Wall  Compression 

The  Vest 

The  Hayek  Oscillator 
Summarv 


High-frequency  oscillation  (HFO),  applied  to  either  the  airway  or  chest  wall,  has  been  associated 
with  changes  in  sputum  attributes  and  clearance.  The  evolution  of  evidence,  both  in  vitro  and  in 
vivo,  supporting  the  use  of  HFO  is  reviewed.  Devices  that  apply  HFO  to  the  airway  range  from  the 
relatively  simple  mechanical  Flutter  and  Acapella  devices  to  the  more  complex  Percussionaire 
Intrapercussive  Ventilators.  The  Vest  and  the  Hayek  Oscillator  are  designed  to  provide  high- 
frequency  chest  wall  compression.  Operation  and  use  of  these  devices  are  described  with  examples 
of  differentiation  of  device  types  by  characterization  of  flows,  and  airway  and  esophageal  pressures. 
Although  HFO  devices  span  a  broad  range  of  costs,  they  provide  a  reasonable  therapeutic  option 
to  support  secretion  clearance  for  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis.  Key  words:  high-frequency  oscilhitiou, 
mucus  clearance,  cystic  fibrosis.    [Respir  Care  2002:47(7):797-807] 


Introduction 

High-frequency  oscillation  (HFO)  of  the  air  column  in 
the  conducting  airways  represents  one  of  several  tech- 
niques a\ailable  to  facilitate  secretion  removal  in  vulner- 
able patients.  A  variety  of  devices  are  available  that  gen- 
erate HFO  by  applying  forces  either  at  the  airway  opening 
or  across  the  chest  wall.  These  devices  range  from  plastic 
hand-held  products  to  table  and  floor  models. 


High-frequency  oscillation  was  initially  administered 
only  to  the  cystic  fibrosis  (CF)  population,  but  a  growing 
body  of  peer-reviewed  scientific  literature  and  anecdotal 
case  studies  suggests  the  value  of  HFO  for  a  wide  range  of 
pulmonary,  neurologic,  and  neuromuscular  disorders.  This 
review  explores  the  range  of  devices,  their  principles  of 
operation,  and  the  evidence  supporting  their  use. 

Definition 


James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FAARC  is  Fellow  in  Respiratory  Science, 
Aerogen  Incorporated.  Mountain  View.  California.  Michael  J  Mahlmeis- 
ter MSc  RRT  IS  attiliated  with  the  Respirator)  Care  Department,  San 
Mateo  Communitv  Hospital.  San  Mateo.  California. 

Mr  Fink  presented  a  version  of  this  repon  at  the  17th  Annual  New 
Horizons  Symposium  at  the  47th  International  Respiratory  Congress,  San 
Antonio.  Texas.  December  14.  2001. 

Correspondence:  James  B  Fink  MSc  RRT  FAARC.  Aerogen  Incorpo- 
rated, 2071  Stierlin  Court.  Mountain  View  CA  94043.  E-mail: 
jfink@aerogen.com. 


The  history  of  HFO  started  with  its  "anecdotal  discov- 
ery" 20  years  ago,  during  research  on  high-frequency  ven- 
tilation. High-frequency  pulsatile  gas  flow  to  the  airway  or 
across  the  chest  wall,  at  3-30  Hz,  was  observed  to  increase 
the  volume  of  secretions  at  the  upper  airway.  .Subsequent 
studies  with  radiotagged  aerosols  confirmed  the  finding 
that  the  cephalad  flow  of  pulmonary  secretions  was  accel- 
erated during  exposure  to  HFO. 

High-frequency  oscillation  is  thought  to  facilitate  mu- 
cus clearance  through  a  variety  of  mechanisms.  HFO  re- 
duces the  viscosity  of  sputum  in  vitro.'   A  decrease  in 


Respiratory  Care  •  Jul^  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


797 


Hk;ii-Frkqi'f.ncy  Oscillation  of  the  Airway  and  Chest  Wall 


mechanical  impedance  of  mucus  appears  to  iiave  a  posi- 
ti\e  ettect  on  clearance  imiuceci  hy  an  in  vitro  simulated 
cough.  Dasgupta  and  colleagues  demonstrated  in  an  in 
\  iiro  model  that  similar  frequencies  applied  to  CF  sputum 
leduced  \isct)eiaslicily  with  increasing  oscillation  lime.' 
This  was  also  true  tor  mucus  gel  stimulants:  the  higher  the 
applied  frequency,  from  0  to  12  and  22  H/.  the  greater  the 
reduction  in  \iscoelasticity.' 

While  the  mechanism  for  the  reduction  in  viscoelastic- 
ily  is  unknown,  likely  possibilities  involve  the  cooperative 
LMitolding  of  the  physical  entanglements  between  the  pri- 
mary netw  ork  of  mucus  glycoproteins  and  other  structural 
macronu>lecules.  the  rupture  of  cross-linking  bonds  such 
as  disulfide  bridges,  or  the  fragmentation  of  larger  mole- 
cules such  as  DNA  of  F-actin,  which  are  present  as  a 
byproduct  of  infection  and  can  increase  mucus  viscoelas- 
ticity  due  to  their  interactions  with  glycoproteins. 

Shearing  at  the  air-mucus  interface  also  appears  to  he  a 
significant  factor  in  the  enhanced  tracheal  mucus  clear- 
ance seen  during  HFO.^  The  transient  changes  in  airflow 
with  the  inspiratory /expiratory  phase  of  each  high  frequency 
cycle,  coupled  with  the  augmented  driving  pressures,  can 
produce  a  cough-like  force  to  the  mucus  layer.  This  shear 
force  is  repeatedly  applied  at  oscillatory  frequencies  that 
approximate  cilia  beat  frequency.  It  suggests  that  HFO 
"resonates"  with  the  lung's  own  cilia  motions,  nudging  the 
mucus  layer  upwards  towards  the  larger  airways  and  tra- 
chea. 

A  third  mechanism  involves  the  redistribution  of  lung 
volume.  The  capacity  of  HFO  to  increase  the  volume  of  air 
distal  to  airways  partially  obstructed  with  mucus,  coupled 
w  ith  the  exposure  of  those  airw  ays  to  enhanced  expiratory 
airflow  and  shear  forces,  seems  a  logical  valuable  mech- 
anism of  action  of  HFO. 

It  is  likely  that  some  combination  iif  change  in  mucus 
rheology,  airflow,  shear  forces,  and  voIlhuc  redistribution 
contributes  to  enhanced  mucus  clearance  in  patients  who 
respond  to  HFO.  At  present,  there  are  2  fundamental  cat- 
egories of  HFO  devices.  One  type  applies  the  forces  across 
the  chest  wall.  ie.  high-frequency  chest  compression;  the 
other  applies  forces  at  the  open  airway,  ie.  high-frequency 
airway  oscillation.  This  distinction  is  important,  since  in 
the  case  of  commercially  available  high  frequency  airway 
oscillation  devices,  the  added  application  of  positive  air- 
way pressure  (PAP)  also  occurs.  It  is  therefore  difficult  to 
isolate  the  clinical  value  of  HFO  versus  PAP. 

It  is  important  to  differentiate  percussion  therapy  from 
HFO.  In  patients  vviili  chronic  bronchitis,  an  electricallv 
driven  pad  vibrating  al  frequencies  of  29-49  Hz.  with  the 
patient  in  a  reclining  position,  produced  only  a  nonsignif- 
icant trend  toward  greater  clearance  and  sputum  produc- 
tion.^ King  et  al'^  applied  high-frequency  chest  wall  oscil- 
lation to  anesthetized  dogs  al  .^17  H/  and  found  an 
increasetl  tiaclical  mucus  clearance  rate;  .^40'/  of  control 


at  1.^  H/.  In  1984.  King  et  aP  reported  on  tracheal  mucus 
clearance  in  anestheti/cd  dogs  thai  underwenl  HFO  v  ia  the 
airway  opening  and  via  the  chesi  wall.  The  rate  was  240% 
of  control  with  HFO  via  the  chest  wall,  whereas  HFO  via 
the  airway  opening  was  less  than  or  equal  to  control.  HFO 
via  the  chest  wall  was  later  demonstrated  to  enhance  both 
peripheral  and  central  mucus  clearance  in  dogs  and  to  be 
safe  when  moderate  pressures  were  applied.'' 

George  et  al'^  found  that  HFO  increased  mucociliary 
clearance  in  normal  humans,  with  9()'/(  clearance  of  a 
radiolabeled  aerosol  within  22.^  min  among  those  who 
underwent  HFO,  compared  to  290  min  among  controls 
(p  <  0.05).  In  contrast,  van  Hengstum  et  al'"  reported  no 
effect  on  tracheobronchial  clearance  from  oral  HFO  com- 
bined with  forced  expiration  maneuvers  in  8  patients  w  ith 
chronic  bronchitis.  Comparing  radiolabeled  aerosol  clear- 
ance with  ( I )  .^0-min  sessions  of  forced  expiratory  tech- 
nique w  Ith  huff,  chest  physical  therapy  (CPT)  in  6  posi- 
tions, and  breathing  exercises.  (2)  oral  HFO  at  9.2.'^-2.5 
Hz.  and  (?<)  control  with  huff  only,  they  found  that  forced 
expiratory  technique  was  more  effective  than  oral  HFO  or 
control. 

The  role  of  airway  oscillatiim  in  secretion  clearance 
remains  unclear.  Van  Hengstum  et  al'"  reported  no  effect 
from  oral  HFO  combined  with  forced  expiration  maneu- 
vers on  tracheobronchial  clearance  in  chronic  bronchitis. 
Further  studies  are  warranted. 

Freitag  et  al"  applied  HFO  at  14  Hz  with  asymmetrical 
waveforms  with  expiratory  bias  (peak  expiratory  flow  3.8 
L/s,  peak  inspiratory  flow  1.3  L/s),  inspiratory  bias,  and 
posture  to  determine  the  effect  of  mucus  clearance  on 
anesthetized  sheep.  Mucus  clearance  in  the  horizontal  po- 
sition with  expiratory-biased  HFO  was  3.5  niL/IO  min:  in 
the  head-down  tilt  position  without  HFO  it  was  3.1  mL/10 
min;  and  in  combination  it  was  I  1.0  mL/lO  min.  No  clear- 
ance occurred  v\  ith  inspiratory  bias,  even  in  the  head-dovv  n 
position. 

High  Frequency  Airway  Oscillation  Devices 

Flutter  Valve 

The  Flutter  mucus  clearance  device  (VarioRavv  .SA.  dis- 
tributed by  Scandipharm.  Birmingham.  Alabama)  com- 
bines the  techniques  of  P.AP  with  HFO  at  the  airway  open- 
ing. The  device  is  pipe-shaped,  with  a  steel  ball  in  the 
■"bowl"  that  is  loosely  covered  by  a  perforated  cap.  The 
weight  of  the  ball  serves  as  an  expiratory  positive  airway 
pressure  (FPAP)  device  (which  creates  a  pressure  of  ap- 
proximately 10  cm  HiO).  while  the  shape  of  the  bowl 
allows  the  ball  repeatedly  to  move  on/off  the  bowl  opening 
("flutter"),  which  generates  oscillations  at  about  15  Hz 
(range  2-32  H/).  with  frequencv  varying  with  device  po- 
sition. The  proposed  mechanism  of  actions  include  shear- 


798 


Re.spiraioky  Carl  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


High-Frequenci  Oscii  i.ation  oi  tiii-  Aikwa'i"  anii  Ciii:st  Wall 


ing  of"  mucus  from  the  airway  wall  by  oscillatory  forces, 
prevention  of  early  airway  closure  by  stabilization  of  the 
airways  with  EPAP,  facilitation  of  cephalaii  How  ol  mu- 
cus, and  changes  in  mucus  rheology." 

Although  the  Flutter  device  has  been  available  m  the 
United  States  for  almost  10  years,  published  data  on  its 
efficacy  are  limited  and  equivocal.'-  "  In  1994.  Konstan  et 
al"  reported  that  the  amount  of  sputum  expectorated  by  18 
CF  patients  was  more  than  3  times  the  amount  expecto- 
rated with  either  voluntary  cough  (described  as  \igorous 
cough  every  2  min  for  15  min)  or  postural  drainage  (up  to 
10  positions  in  15  min).  These  findings  merit  close  scru- 
tiny because  of  the  study  design.  Studied  patients  contin- 
ued to  receive  their  regular  CPT  throughout  the  2-week 
study  period,  so  the  study  looked  only  at  measured  sputum 
from  an  extra  therapy  session  each  day.'-*  Patients  with  CF 
or  other  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  diseases  (COPD) 
tend  to  suffer  premature  airway  closure  during  vigorous 
cough  (as  opposed  to  forced  expiratory  technique,  huff,  or 
active  cycle  of  breathing  cough  maneuvers),  resulting  in 
trapped  gas  and  retained  secretions.  Furthermore,  national 
guidelines  suggest  that  effective  postural  drainage  requires 
3-15  min  per  position,  so  10  drainage  positions  requnes 
30-150  min  to  provide  effective  results.'^  It  appears  that 
neither  the  cough  nor  the  postural  drainage  parts  of  the 
protocol  were  designed  in  light  of  available  research  to 
provide  optimal  results  (Table  1 ). 

In  1994.  Pryor  et  al"'  studied  24  CF  patients  who  aver- 
aged >  1 1 .9  g  of  sputum  per  day  using  active  cycle  of 
breathing  technique  as  their  standard  bronchial  hygiene. 
Active  cycle  of  breathing  alone  resulted  in  significantly 
more  sputum  production  than  10  min  of  Flutter  therapy 
followed  by  active  cycle  of  breathing  technique.  The  au- 
thors expressed  concern  about  the  possibility  of  increased 
sputum  retention  when  the  Flutter  was  used. 

Homnick  et  al' '  studied  24  CF  patients  (age  8-44)  dur- 
ing hospitalization  for  acute  exacerbation,  and  assigned 
them  to  receive  either  standard  CPT  or  supervised  Flutter 
therapy  4  times  a  day.  Significant  improvements  were  ob- 
served between  admission  and  discharge  within  each  group. 
but  no  significant  differences  were  found  in  clinical  score 
or  pulmonary  function  test  results  between  the  groups  from 
admission  to  discharge.  Similarly.  Padman  et  al'**  reported 
a  comparison  of  Flutter.  EPAP,  and  CPT  in  6  of  15  CF 
patients  who  completed  the  study,  and  found  no  signif- 
icant differences  in  pulmonary  function  test  results  or 
assessment  variables,  but  reported  a  patient  preference 
for  Flutter. 

Oscillations  are  capable  of  decreasing  mucus  viscoelas- 
ticity  at  frequencies  and  amplitudes  achievable  with  the 
Flutter  device.  App  et  al'''  evaluated  autogenic  drainage 
and  Flutter  in  14  CF  patients,  using  a  crossover  design 
with  separate  4-week  courses  of  autogenic  drainage  and 
Flutter.  There  were  no  significant  changes  in  forced  vital 


Table  1 .      PrcKediire  for  Administration  of  Flutter  Therapy 

L   Assess  whether  Fliuier  lhcr;ip\  is  imlicileil  ^iiid  desij;n  a  IrealmciU 
program. 

a.  Bring  equipmenl  Ui  ihe  hedside  and  provide  iniual  therapy, 
adjusting  pressure  settings  to  meet  patient  need. 

b.  After  initial  treatment  or  patient  training,  eommunieale  Ihe 
treatment  plan  lo  the  physieian(s)  and  nurse(s)  and  provide 
instruction  to  the  nursing  stafL  if  required. 

2.  Explain  that  Flutter  therapy  is  used  to  re-cxpaiid  lung  tissue  and 

help  mobilize  secretions.  Patients  should  be  taught  to  huff. 
,^.  Instruct  the  patient  to: 

a.  .Sit  comfortably 

b.  Take  in  a  breath  thai  is  larger  than  normal,  but  don't  till  the 
lungs  completely. 

c.  .Seal  the  lips  firmly  around  the  Flutter  device  mouthpiece  and 
evhale  actively,  but  not  forcefully,  holding  the  Flutter  valve  at  an 
angle  that  produces  maximum  oscillation. 

d.  Perform  10-20  breaths. 

e.  Remove  the  Flutter  mouthpiece  and  perform  2-3  huffs  and  then 
rest  as  needed. 

t    Repeat  above  cycle  4-8  times,  not  lo  exceed  20  minutes. 

4.  Evaluate  the  patient  for  ability  to  self-administer. 

5.  When  appropriate,  teach  the  patient  to  self-administer  Flutter 
therapy.  Observe  the  patient  conduct  the  self-administration  on 
several  occasions  to  ensure  proper  uncoached  Flutter  technique 
before  allowing  the  patient  to  self-administer  without  supervision. 

6.  When  patients  are  also  receiving  bronchodilator  aerosol,  administer 
in  conjunction  with  Flutter  by  administering  bronchodilator 
immediately  preceding  the  Flutter  breaths. 

7.  When  visibly  soiled,  rinse  Flutter  device  with  sterile  water  and 
shake/air  dry.  Leave  the  device  within  reach  at  patient  hedside. 

X.  Send  the  Flutter  device  home  with  the  patient. 

9.  Document,  in  the  patient's  medical  record,  procedures  performed 

(including  device,  number  of  breaths  per  treatment,  and  frequency). 

paiient  response  to  therapy,  patient  teaching  provided,  and  patient 

abililv  to  self-administer. 


capacity,  forced  expiratory  volume  in  the  first  second,  or 
sputum  volume.  At  the  end  of  the  study  both  groups  showed 
a  67r  (nonsignificant)  improvement  in  forced  vital  capac- 
ity. Sputum  viscoelasticity  was  lower  (p  <  0.01)  with 
Flutter  than  with  autogenic  drainage.  There  was  a  nonsig- 
nificant increase  in  sputum  production  during  Flutter  ther- 
apy— more  than  during  autogenic  drainage.  They  also  re- 
ported that  in  vitro  elastic  properties  of  CF  sputum  samples 
were  affected  by  19  Hz  oscillations  generated  by  a  Flutter 
device  (for  15  and  30  min.  with  mean  air  flow  velocity  of 
1.5  Us). 

Weiner  et  al-"  compared  Flutter  with  sham  treatment 
with  20  COPD  patients  and  reported  improved  COPD  symp- 
toms in  the  Flutter  group,  compared  to  baseline  (p  <  0.05). 
After  3  months,  forced  vital  capacity,  forced  expiratory 
volume  in  the  first  second,  and  12-min  walk  lest  improved 
in  the  treatment  group,  whereas  the  sham  therapy  group 
was  unchanged.  Similarly.  Girard  and  Terki-'  studied  20 
patients  suffering  from  hyperproductive  asthma  and  hy- 
persensitivity to  acarids  as  a  major  allergen.  The  subjects 


Respiratory  Care  •  Ji;l'>-  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


799 


HkiIi-Frequency  Oscii.i  ation  of  thr  Airway  and  Chf.st  Wail 


Table  2.      Test  l.uns;  Me;isurenienls 


PEF 

(L/min) 

"peak 

(cm  H,0) 

FPAP 
(cm  H,0) 

WOB 

(J/Li 

P,nca„ 

(cm  HP) 

(mL) 

Flutter 

27.1 

18.8 

8.4 

1 .406 

7.5 

450 

TR(IOcmH.O) 

39.0 

I.";.? 

7.5 

1.2?l.'i 

6.6 

450 

TR(l5cni  H,0) 

40.0 

20.6 

12.5 

1 .6^4 

9.9 

700 

FO  (4.0  mm) 

23.7 

^.5 

00.3 

().73X 

0.8 

0 

FO  (3.0  mm) 

13.4 

10.2 

0.3 

0.714 

1.6 

0 

PEF  =  peak  expiratory  flow 

Pjvak  ~  P^"^  airway  pnssure 

EPAP  =  expiralor)  p^isilivc  airway  pressure 

WOB  =  work  of  hrcalhini: 

Pmiaii  ~  mean  airrtay  pressure 

ARV  =  change  in  residual  volume 

TR  =  threshold  resistor 

FO  -  fixed  orifice  resistor 


used  Fkitler  tor  .'^-iiiin  sessions  5  times/d  for  30-45  days. 
There  was  objecti\e  and  suhjeclive  inipro\eiiient  in  18  of 
tiie  20  patients. 

To  better  understand  how  the  Fkitter  device  compares  to 
other  PAP  devices,  we--  compared  Flutter  with  both  tiircsh- 
old  resistors  and  fi.xed-orifice  resistors  to  determine  eftects 
on  the  airway  in  vitro.  Using  a  test  lung  (with  a  compli- 
ance of  0.02  cm  H^O/L).  during  passi\e  exhalation  (tidal 
volume  500  niL.  peak  inspiratory  tlow  40  L/min).  we  mea- 
sured pressure  patterns,  peak  expiratory  flow,  peak  expi- 
ratory pressure,  mean  airway  pressure,  work  of  breathing 
(WOB).  and  changes  in  residual  volume  (Table  2). 

The  Flutter  device  had  lower  peak  expirators  tlow  than 
the  threshold  resistors  but  higher  tlow  than  the  fixed-ori- 
fice resistors,  hi  all  other  respects  the  Flutter  resembled  the 
threshold  resistors.  The  fixed-orifice  resistors  had  lower 
peak  tlow.  peak  and  mean  airway  pressures.  WOB.  and 
residual  volume  than  either  of  the  threshold  resistors  or  the 
Flutter  (p  <  0.001). 

EPAP  causes  greater  WOB  than  continuous  positive 
airway  pressui'e  (CPAP).- '  In  the  bench  study  by  Schlobohm 
et  al-'  both  the  Flutter  and  threshold  resistors  produced 
a  greater  WOB  than  the  fixed-orifice  resistor.  It  is  un- 
clear what  the  effects  of  that  higher  WOB  may  be  in  the 
severely  obstructed  COPD  patient.  Clearly,  CPAP  has  a 
role  in  reducing  dyspnea,-^ -"^  whereas  EPAP  may  not 
(at  least  during  exercise).  Large-scale  studies  are  re- 
quired lo  determine  the  relative  benetits  of  Flutter  ther- 
apy to  the  less  expensive  PAP  and  breathing  maneu\er 
therapies. 

Flow,  and  ,\irway  and  Esophageal  Pressures.  A  nor- 
mal \ohmtccr  wiih  an  esophageal  balloon  in  place  was 
askeil  lo  breathe  while  using  a  high-frequency  oscillator  in 
accordance  v^ith  niaiuifacturer  instructions.  Airv\ay  pres- 
sures and  tlows  were  measured  v\ith  a  pneuniotachometer 
placed  al  ihc  airwas  and  recorded  using  a  VciiTrak  mon- 


itt)r  (No\ametrix,  Medical  Systems,  Wallingford,  Connect- 
icut). Figure  1  shows  the  flow  and  the  airway  and  esoph- 
ageal pressures  for  normal  tidal  breathing.  The 
inspiratory-expirator)  ratio  was  1:2  and  inspiratory  and 
expiratory  flow  were  30  L/min.  Airway  pressure  fluc- 
tuation was  less  than  1  cm  H2O  at  atmospheric  baseline. 
Esophageal  pressures  were  subatmospheric.  with  tidal 
changes  between  -6  and  -12  cm  H2O.  and  minor  rhyth- 
mic fluctuations  of  0.5-2.0  cm  H^O  correlate  with  heart 
rate. 

Figure  2  shows  the  results  for  the  weighted  ball  thresh- 
old resister  (Flutter).  The  tluctuations  of  tlow  and  airway 
pressure  were  similar  during  expiration,  with  <  0.5  cm 
HiO  fluctuation  in  esophageal  pressure.  Expiratory  tlow  > 
40  L/min  appears  to  be  unrestricted:  it  decreases  gradually 
toward  the  end  of  expiration  and  generates  a  relatively  flat 
mean  airway  pressure.  Esophageal  pressure  equalizes  w  ith 
airway  pressure  early  in  the  expiratory  phase  and  exceeds 
airway  pressure  by  as  much  as  10  cm  H^O  as  exhalation 
continues  past  midpoint. 

Intermittent  Percussive  Ventilation 

Intermittent  percussi\e  \entilation  (IPV)  of  the  lungs  as 
a  therapeutic  form  of  CPT  was  advanced  by  Dr  Forrest 
Bird  as  a  treatment  for  COPD  patients.  IPV  involves  a 
pneumatic  de\ice  called  a  Percussionator  (Fig.  3).  IPV 
was  designed  to  treat  diffuse,  patch\  atelectasis,  enhance 
secretion  mobilization  and  clearance,  and  deli\er  nebu- 
lized medications  and  wetting  agents  to  the  distal  airways.-'' 

With  IPV  the  patient  breathes  through  a  mouthpiece  that 
delivers  high-tlow  "mini-bursts"  at  rates  of  >  200  Hz  (Fig. 
4).  During  these  percussive  bursts  of  gas  a  continuous 
airwav  pressure  is  maintained  while  the  pulsatile  percus- 
sive airwas  pressure  increases.  Each  percussive  cvcle  is 
programmed  bv  the  patient  ttr  clinician,  bv  holding  down 
a  thumb  bullon  lor  5-10  seconds  loi"  the  pciciissive  in- 


8UU 


Rfspirator'i  Care  •  Ji  L^t  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Hir,H-FRi:oL'i;Nc^  Oscii.i  aiion  oi    iiii   Airway  and  Ciii:sr  Wall 


Fig.  1 .  Flow  (upper  curve)  and  airway  pressure  and  esophageal  pressure  (lower  curve)  during  normal  tidal  breathing,  as  measured  with  a 
pneumotachometer  placed  at  the  airway. 


Fig.  2.  Flow  (upper  panel)  and  airway  pressure  and  esophageal  pressure  (lower  panel)  generated  by  a  normal  subject  while  breathing 
through  a  Flutter  valve. 


spiratory  cycle  and  releasing  the  button  for  exhalation.  The 
manufacturer  recommends  treatments  of  approximately  20 
min.  Impaction  pressures  of  25-40  psig  are  delivered  with 
a  frequency  from  <  100  to  225  percussive  cycles/min  at 
40  psig.  The  lPV-2  includes  nonoscillatory  demand  CPAP 
and/or  oscillatory  demand  CPAP  with  intermittent  man- 
datory \entilation.  C'jimcians  have  described  use  of  IPV 
through  both  inspiratory  and  expiratory  cycles. 


Natale  et  al-''  reported  that  a  single  IPV  treatment  was  as 
effective  as  standard  CPT  in  improving  acute  pulmonary 
function  and  enhancing  sputum  expectoration  in  9  CF  pa- 
tients. Honinick  et  aP"  later  undertook  a  6-month  parallel, 
comparative  trial  comparing  IPV  to  standard  manual  CPT 
in  accordance  w  ith  the  Cystic  Fibrosis  Foundation's  guide- 
lines, in  16  CF  patients  (children  and  adults).  They  found 
no  significant  tlifferenccs  between  the  Ireatment  groups 


Respiratory  Care  •  Jul^  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


801 


Hir,H-FRi:oui;NCY  Osciii  ation  f)F  thh  Airway  and  Chest  Wall 


Fig.  3.  Intrapulmonary  percussive  ventilator  (IPV)  device.  (Courtesy 
of  Percusslonaire  Corporation,  Sandpoint,  Idaho). 


and  concluded  the  treatments  were  comparable.  One  IPV 
patient  had  hght  hemoptysis  during  the  study. 

Newhouse  et  al-'*  compared  IPV  and  Flutter  to  standard 
CPT  in  children  and  adults  with  CF.  No  difference  in  sputum 
quantity  was  found,  but  transient  lower  oxygen  saturation 
was  found  with  CPT.  All  3  therapies  showed  trends  towards 
lower  lung  volumes  at  I  and  4  hours  after  administration. 

Further  studies  would  be  valuable  in  determining  the  merit 
of  IPV  in  comparison  to  other  lung  expansion/secretion  clear- 
ance techniques.  With  so  little  published  on  IPV,-'"-'-  one 
might  assume  that  contraindications  and  hazards  are  similar 


to  those  associated  with  other  forms  of  mechanical  ventila- 
lion.  The  manufacturer  lists  potential  adverse  effects  to  in- 
clude sore  ribs,  fatigue,  stress,  and  initation. 

Flow,  and  Airway  and  Esophageal  Pressures.  Oral 
HFO  with  IPV  generates  large  fluctuations  in  How.  which 
are  greater  on  expiration  than  on  inspiration.  Airway  pres- 
sure Ouctuutions  of  4-8  cm  H^O  correlate  to  esophageal 
fluctuations  of  1-2  cm  H^O.  Airway  pressure  on  expira- 
tion is  square-wave  (increases  to  peak  and  plateaus  until 
expiration!;  esophageal  pressure  increases  to  match  airway 
pressure  in  approximately  2  seconds  (see  Fig.  4). 

Several  disposable  hand-held  devices  have  recently  been 
introduced  to  the  market,  purporting  to  enhance  mucus  clear- 
ance. A  pneumatic,  single-patient,  multiple-use.  high- 
frequency  intrapulmon;vy  percussion  aerosol  deliver*'  system 
that  oscillates  at  6-14  Hz  (PercussiveTech  HF,  Vortran  Med- 
ical Technology,  Sacramento,  California)  has  been  introduced 
in  the  market  (Fig.  5).  The  Acapella  (DHD  Healthcare, 
Wanipsville.  New  York)  combines  the  resistive  features  of 
the  positive  expiratory  pressure  of  a  PEP  valve  and  the  vi- 
bratory features  of  a  flutter  valve  to  mobilize  secretions  in  the 
airway.  Determination  of  the  efficacy  of  these  devices  awaits 
proof  from  published  scientific  data. 

High-Frequency  External  Chest  Wall  Compression 

High-frequency  chest  wall  compression  (HFCWC)  has 
been  shown  to  increase  tracheal  mucus  clearance  rates  and 
lo  correlate  with  improved  ventilation  in  both  animal  and 


o 

16- 

CM 

I 

12- 

F 

o 

B- 

2? 

4 

3 

CO 

0 

(/) 

<D 

Fig.  4.  Flow  (upper  curve)  and  airway  pressure  and  esophageal  pressure  (lower  curve)  while  breathing  on  an  intrapulmonary  percussive 
ventilator  (IPV)  device. 


802 


Respir.atorv  Carl  •  }vl\  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


HlCH-FRHQUENrV  OSCII  1  ATIDN  DF  TIIH   AlRVVAV   AND  ClIl'ST  WaI.I. 


Fig.  5.  PercussiveTech  HF  pneumatic,  single-patient,  high- 
frequency  intrapulmonary  percussion  aerosol  delivery  system. 
(Courtesy  of  Vortran  Medical  Technology,  Sacramento,  California.) 


clinical  studies. "■'■•  As  mentioned  earlier.  HFCWC  was 
originally  developed  to  provide  ventilatory  support  for  pa- 
tients tor  whom  conventional  mechanical  ventilation  was 
inadequate.  Because  HFCWC  apparently  mobilized  secre- 
tions in  anesthetized  dogs,  its  effect  on  tracheal  mucus 
clearance  was  studied.  King  et  al  reported  in  1983"  that 
HFCWC  in  healthy  anesthetized  dogs  increased  the  clear- 
ance rate  of  tracheal  mucus  marker  particles  by  as  much  as 
3-fold,  compared  w  ith  quiet  breathing.  Secretion  clearance 
was  also  enhanced  in  peripheral  airways,  as  measured  with 
inhaled  radioaerosols.**  Orally  applied  high-frequency  air- 
flow oscillations  had  no  significant  effect  on  tracheal  mu- 
cus clearance  in  the  canine  model. ^ 

HFCWC  is  believed  to  act  by  a  combination  of  3  pos- 
sible mechanisms.  In  in  vitro  experiments."  '"^  high-fre- 
quency airflow  oscillations  (of  comparable  amplitude  to 
those  achieved  in  vivo)  reduced  the  viscoelastic  and  co- 
hesive properties  of  mucus,  which  would  make  mucus 
more  easily  clearable  by  the  air-liquid  interactions  associ- 
ated with  cephalad  airflow  velocity  bias.  Second,  the  HFOs 
may  reinforce  the  mucus  interaction  with  the  cilia  or  the 
natural  harmonics  of  the  chest  wall.  Evidence  for  this  the- 
ory comes  from  the  fact  that  optimal  frequencies  for  clear- 
ance by  HFCWC  are  in  the  range  of  13-15  Hz.«  Third. 
HFCWC  may  stimulate  the  release  of  fresh  secretions  by 
a  vagal  reflex  mechanism,  the  fresh  secretions  being  more 
easily  mobilized  by  airflow  interactions. 


Fig.  6.  The  Vest.  (Courtesy  of  Advanced  Respiratory,  St  Paul,  Min- 
nesota.) 


The  Vest 

The  Vest  (Advanced  Respiratory,  St  Paul.  Minnesota), 
previously  known  as  the  ThAlRapy  Vest,  was  developed 
by  Warwick  et  al  at  the  University  of  Minnesota.  In  1988 
this  device  received  FDA  clearance  to  market  for  secretion 
clearance.  More  recently,  in  2000  the  FDA  approval  was 
expanded  to  include  sputum  induction.  Of  all  the  devices 
commercially  available  for  HFO,  The  Vest  has  by  far  the 
largest  body  of  literature. 

The  device,  designed  for  self-administered  therapy,  con- 
sists of  a  large-volume  variable-frequency  air-pulse  deliv- 
ery system  attached  to  a  nonstretchable,  inflatable  vest 
worn  by  the  patient,  which  extends  over  the  entire  torso, 
down  to  the  iliac  crest  (Fig.  6).  Pressure  pulses,  which  fill 
the  vest  and  vibrate  the  chest  wall,  are  controlled  by  the 
patient  with  a  foot  pedal  and  applied  during  expiration  or 
the  entire  respiratory  cycle.  Pulse  frequency  is  adjustable 
from  5  to  25  Hz,  with  pressure  in  the  vest  ranging  from  28 
mm  Hg  at  5  Hz  to  39  mm  Hg  at  25  Hz. 

In  theory,  these  vibrations  to  the  chest  wall  cause  tran- 
sient increases  in  air  flow  in  the  lungs,  to  improve  gas- 
liquid  interactions  and  mucus  movement.  Animal  and  clin- 
ical studies  demonstrated  that  the  frequency  of  oscillations 
and  flow  bias  (inspiratory  vs  expiratory)  are  important  in 
determining  effectiveness.  Flow  bias  determines  whether 
secretions  move  upstream  or  downstream."'  Conjecture 
that  this  device  has  a  role  in  lung  expansion  for  patients 
other  than  those  with  CF  in  the  acute  care  setting  has  not 
been  empirically  established. 

The  Vest  has  been  reported  to  be  more  effective  than 
postural  drainage  in  secretion  clearance,  on  the  basis  of 
several  studies  specific  to  CF  patients.'"  Kluft  et  al"  stud- 
ied HFCWC  versus  CPT/postural  drainage  in  a  crossover 
trial  of  29  CF  patients,  randomly  alternated  on  a  daily 
basis.  Each  day  included  three  30-min  therapy  sessions. 


Respiratory  C.-\re  •  Jll^-  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


803 


Hi(,ii-Fi<i;yuiiNCY  Oscillation  ol  thl  Airway  and  Chhst  Wall 


0- 


a;MiaIj^I'^-J'''U~'^.xJ.X4.<aw^^ 


W     -6- 
E     -8- 


wviM  J.  ^   a'' 


-10-- 


n 


\^' 


V' 


^-^ 


Vy^V*^ 


\ 


Fig.  7.  Flow  (upper  curve)  and  airway  pressure  and  esophageal  pressure  (lower  curve)  while  using  The  Vest. 


Sputum  was  collected  during  and  15  iiiin  after  each  ses- 
sion. For  HFCWC.  6  trequencies  (6.  8.  14.  15.  18.  and  19 
Hz)  were  applied  tor  5  min  each,  in  order  of  increasing 
frequency.  Each  frequency  application  was  followed  by  a 
deep  breath  with  huff,  with  the  device  turned  off.  and  the 
patient  actively  coughed.  Patients  received  nebulized  nor- 
mal saline  via  small-volume  nebulizer  during  treatment. 
CFT/postural  drainage  included  chest  percussion  with  pos- 
tural drainage  of  5  sites  for  2-3  min  per  position,  followed 
by  vibration  and  forced  cough.  The  5  positions  rotated 
during  each  of  3  sessions  to  cover  all  lobes  in  24  hours. 
The  CRT  sessions  did  not  include  huff  and  there  was  no 
mention  of  nebulization  of  saline.  Sputum  wet  and  dry 
weights  were  determined  for  each  type  of  therapy.  There 
was  significantly  more  sputum  production  with  HFCWC 
than  with  CPT. 

Arens  et  al"*  studied  50  CF  patients  randomly  assigned 
to  3-times-a-day  therapy  during  admission  for  acute  exac- 
erbation. CRT  was  performed  with  6  positions  over  30  min 
(4  lying  and  2  sitting  with  4  min  of  percussion  in  each 
position).  HFCWC  treatments  consisted  of  6  frequencies 
for  4-5  min  each.  All  patients  received  aerosol  with  al- 
buterol prior  to  CPT  or  during  therapy.  The  1-hour  wet 
weight  of  sputum  with  HFCWC  was  greater  than  with 
CPT  ( 14.6  ±  2.9  g  vs  6.0  ±  1 .8  g,  p  <  0.035).  The  authors 
concluded  that  HFCWC  and  CPT  were  et|ually  safe  and 
effective  when  used  during  acute  exacerbation. 

Flow,  and  Airway  and  I'.sopha^eal  Pressures.     HFCWC 

with  The  Vc.\l  results  ni  a  relati\el)  normal  flow  pattern, 
which  appears  unrestricted.  As  flow  decreases,  the  fluctu- 
ations increase.  Airway  pressure  remains  at  baseline,  like 


normal  tidal  breathing,  with  fluctuations  of  0.5-0.75  cm 
HiO.  Unlike  PAR  and  Flutter,  esophageal  pressure  re- 
mains subalmospheric.  with  fluctuations  of  0.25- 1.0  cm 
H,0  (Fig.  7). 

The  Hayek  Oscillator 

The  Hayek  Oscillator  is  an  electrically  powered,  micro- 
processor-controlled, noninvasive  oscillator  ventilator  that 
uses  an  external,  flexible  chest  enclosure  (cuirass)  to  apply 
negative  and  positive  pressure  to  the  chest  wall  to  deliver 
noninvasive  oscillation  to  the  lungs  (Fig.  8).  The  negative 
pressure  generated  in  the  cuirass  causes  the  chest  wall  to 
expand  for  inspiration;  positive  pressure  compresses  the 
chest  to  produce  a  forced  expiration.  Both  inspiratory  and 
expiratory  phases  can  be  active  and  not  reliant  on  passive 
recoil  of  the  chest.  Expiratory  pressure  can  be  positive, 
atmospheric,  or  negative,  allowing  ventilation  to  occur 
above,  at,  or  below  the  patient's  normal  functional  residual 
capacity.  Several  groups  have  reported  success  in  using 
this  device  as  a  method  of  ventilatory  support.*'  "•-  Four 
adjustable  xariables  w  ilh  the  Hayek  include  frequency  range 
(8  to  999  oscillations/min),  inspiration-expiration  ratio  (6: 1 
to  1:6).  and  inspiratory  pressure  (-70  to  70  cm  H,0). 

Clinicians'  anecdotal  observations  of  "spontaneous  ex- 
pulsion of  secretions"-"  ■'-'  during  high-frequency  ventila- 
tion has  led  to  development  of  several  discrete  secretion 
management  program  recommendations,  in  which  the  chest 
is  oscillated  through  2  sets  of  cycles:  several  minutes  at  a 
high-frequency  of  up  to  999  (usually  600/720)  cycles/min 
at  an  ins|iiralion-e\piration  ratio  of  1:1.  followed  b\  60/90 


804 


Rl.si'ikaiok'i  Care  •  Jul^  2U02  Vol  47  No  7 


Hic;ii-Fki  oi'i:n(">'  Oscii  i  mion  oi    iiii.  Aikway  and  C'iiisi  Wai.i. 


Cuirass 

Cuirass 
short  tubes 


Pressure 
sensor  tubing 


Keyboard/ 
control  unit 


Power  unit 


Cuirass 
Y-connector 


Wide  bore  tube 

/ 


Fig.  8.  The  Hayek  Oscillator  (Breasy  Medical  Equipment  Ltd.  Lon- 
don, United  Kingdom).  (From  Reference  39,  with  permission.) 


cycles/min  at  an  inspiration-expiiation  ratio  of  5:\.  The 
settings  can  he  clianged  aecording  lo  llie  patient's  per- 
cei\ed  need.  No  ivjioris  have  been  published  on  the  elTi- 
eaes  of  this  or  similar  protocols  lor  secrelioii  managenienl 
with  the  Hayek. 

HFO  applied  \ia  the  airway  or  via  the  chest  wall  and 
CPT  have  coni|iarable  aiiynienlini;  elTecIs  on  expectorated 
spulinn  weight,  vvilhoiil  chansjinii  pulmonary  function  test 
results  or  oxygen  saluiaiion.^^  According  to  earlier  exper- 
iments, prerequisiles  ioi'  optimal  cephalad  transport  ot  mu- 
cus by  air-li(.|uid  interaction  include  air  How  with  an  ex- 
piratory bias,  which  neeils  to  be  in  the  range  of  1-3  L/s. 
and  for  airway  oscillation  at  S-I.'i  H/.  This  was  confirmed 
in  an  experiment,  and  high-frequency  chest  wall  oscilla- 
tion was  found  lo  improve  oxygenation  and  ventilation  in 
patients  with  normal  linigs,  in  patients  with  respiratory 
failure,  and  in  patients  with  COPD. 

Flow,  and  Airway  and  E.sophageal  Pres.sures.  With 
the  Hayek  Oscillator,  expiratory  How  appears  unrestricted. 
airway  pressure  fluctuations  are  greater  (up  to  ±  1.3  cm 
H^O)  on  expiration,  with  subatmospheric  esophageal  pres- 
sure, and  with  tTuctualii)ns  of  0.5-1.0  cm  H2O  (Fig.  9). 

It  appears  that  the  HFCWC  devices  create  similar  air- 
flow and  pressure  patterns,  with  differences  in  frequency. 

Summary 

These  maneuvers  and  devices  may  have  a  place  in  pro- 
moting bronchial  hygiene  in  CF  patients.  It  is  intuitively 
attractive  to  believe  that  maneuvers  that  reinforce  or  com- 


■v4'JVt>'>/*1 


'"^''^/WVWV^  •''^'''"^ 


10 


'■jtfMlWPrM 


tv^■^^./V.^<^« 


ly 


r^vy-^-^v^-^v^y^^J 


Fig.  9.  Flow  (upper  curve)  and  airway  pressure  and  esophageal  pressure  (lower  curve)  while  using  the  Hayek  Oscillator. 


Respir.atory  C.'\rk  •  JiT.'i  2002  Voi,  47  No  7 


805 


Hic;h-Frequency  Oscillation  of  thf.  Airway  and  Chest  Wall 


plenient  normal  mechanisms  of  mucociliary  clearance  pro- 
vide improved  secretion  clearance  with  considerably  less 
effort  and  inconvenience  than  postural  drainage.  Though 
the  research  has  not  identified  one  "superior"  therapy,  we 
have  identified  a  substantial  niniiber  of  \  iable  alternatives 
that  appear  to  be  as  good  as  or  belter  than  postural  drain- 
age. In  the  next  se\ eral  decades  CF  patients  may  have  the 
need  and  opportunity  to  use  these  devices  and  techniques, 
and  the  ultimate  key  to  the  success  of  any  one  of  them  may 
be  how  comfortable  and  convenient  it  proves  for  the  in- 
dividual patient. 

Utilizing  the  AARC  Clinical  Practice  Guidelines  as  a 
framework  for  developing  protocols  for  use.  and  defining 
desirable  end  points  that  include  (but  are  not  limited  to) 
sputum  volume.  HFO  devices  offer  the  clinician  a  valuable 
tool  in  the  management  of  patients  who  may  need  assis- 
tance with  secretion  clearance  and  atelectasis. 


REFERENCES 


1.  Chang  HK.  Weber  ME,  King  M.  Mucus  transport  by  high-frequency 
nonsymmetrical  oscillatory  airtlow.  J  Appl  Physiol  1988:65(3):  1 203- 
1209. 

2.  Dasgupta  B.  Tomkieuic/  RP.  Boyd  W'A.  Brown  NE.  King  M.  Ef- 
fects of  combined  treatment  with  rhDNase  and  airtlow  oscillations 
on  spinnability  of  cystic  fibrosis  sputum  in  vitro.  Pediatr  Pulmonol 
1995:20(2):78-82. 

3.  Lindemann  H.  [The  value  of  physical  therapy  with  VRP  I  -  Desitin 
(•■Flutter")]  Pneumologie  1992:46(1 2 ):626-630. /trnV/f  in  German 

4.  King  M.  Zidulka  A.  Phillips  DM.  Wight  D.  Gross  D.  Chang  HK. 
Tracheal  mucus  clearance  in  high-frequency  oscillation:  effect  of 
peak  flow  rate  bias.  Eur  Respir  J  1990:3(1):6-13. 

.5.  Holody  B.  Goldberg  HS.  The  effect  of  mechanical  vibration  phys- 
iotherapy on  arterial  oxygenation  in  acutely  ill  patients  with  atelec- 
tasis or  pneumonia.  Am  Re\  Respir  Dis  l98l:l24(4):372-375. 

6.  King  M.  Phillips  DM.  Gross  D.  Vartian  V.  Chang  HK.  Zidulka  A. 
Enhanced  tracheal  mucus  clearance  with  high  frequency  chest  wall 
compression.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  I983:I28(3):5I  1-515. 

7.  King  M.  Phillips  DM.  Zidulka  A.  Chang  HK.  Tracheal  mucus  clear- 
ance in  high-frequency  oscillation.  II:  Chest  wall  versus  mouth  os- 
cillation. Am  Rev  Respir  Dis.  l984:l30(5):703-706. 

8.  Gross  D.  Zidulka  A.  O'Brien  C.  Wight  D,  Eraser  R.  Rosenthal  L. 
King  M.  Peripheral  mucocilliary  clearance  with  high-frequency  chest 
wall  compression.  J  Appl  Physiol  I985:58(4):l  157-1 163. 

9.  George  RJ.  Johnson  MA.  Pavia  D.  Agnew  JE.  Clarke  SE.  Geddes 
DM.  Increase  in  mucocilliary  clearance  in  normal  man  induced  by 
oral  high  frequency  oscillation.  Thorax  l985:40(6):433-7. 

10.  van  Hengstum  M,  Festen  J.  Beurskens  C.  Hankel  M,  van  den  Broek 
W,  Corstens  F.  No  effect  of  oral  high  frequency  oscillation  combined 
with  forced  expiration  manoeuvres  on  tracheobronchial  clearance  in 
chronic  bronchitis.  Eur  Respir  J  I990:3(  1  ):14-IS. 
Freitag  L.  Long  WM.  Kim  CS.  Wanner  A.  ftemoval  of  excessive 
bronchial  secretions  by  asymmetrical  high-frequency  oscillations. 
J  Appl  Physiol  I9S9:67(2):6I4-619. 

12.  Huls  G.  Boldl  A.  Kicselmann  R.  Lindemann  H.  Child  physiotherapy 
in  cases  of  chronic  retention  of  mucus.  Der  Kilnderarzt  1992:23: 
2(K)4-20I1. 

13.  Konsian  MW.  Stern  RC,  Doershuk  CF.  Efficacy  of  the  flutter  device 
for  airway  mucus  clearance  in  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis.  J  Pediatr 
1994:124(5  Pt  l):689-693. 


II 


14.  Mahcsh  VK.  McDougal  J  A.  Haluszka  L.  Efficacy  of  the  Flutter 

device  for  airway  mucus  clearance  in  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis. 

.1  Pediatr  1996:128(11:16.5-166. 
I.s.  .Vinerican  Association  for  Respiratory  Care.  .A.ARC  Clinical  Practice 

Guideline:  Postural  drainage  therapy.  Respir  Care  199 1:36(1 2):  1418- 

1426. 

16.  Pryor  JA.  Webber  BA.  Hodson  ME.  Warner  JO.  The  Flutter  VRPI 
as  an  adjunct  to  chest  physiotherapy  in  cystic  fibrosis.  Respir  Med 
1994:88(9):677-6S1. 

17.  Homnick  DN.  Anderson  K.  Marks  JH.  Comparison  of  the  flutter 
device  to  standard  chest  physiotherapy  in  hospitalized  patients  with 
cystic  fibrosis:  a  pilot  smdy.  Chest  1998:1 14(41:993-997. 

18.  Padman  R.  Geouque  DM.  Engelhardt  MT.  Effects  of  the  flutter 
device  on  pulmonary  function  studies  among  pediatric  cystic  fibrosis 
patients.  Del  Med  J  1999:7I(  1 ):  13-18, 

19.  App  EM.  Kieselmann  R.  Reinhardt  D.  Lindemann  H.  Dasgupta  B, 
King  M,  Brand  P.  Sputum  rheology  changes  in  cystic  fibrosis  lung 
disease  following  two  different  types  of  physiotherapy:  flutter  vs 
autogenic  drainage.  Chest  1998:1 14(  I  ):I71-177. 

20.  Weiner  P.  Zamir  D.  Waizman  J.  Weiner  M.  (Physiotherapy  in  chronic 
obstructive  pulmonary  disease:  oscillatory  breathing  with  flutter 
VRPI. I  Harefuah  1996:1311 1.2):14-17.71.  Arlide  in  Hebrew 

21.  Girard  JP.  Terki  N.  The  Flutter  VRPI:  a  new  personal  pocket  ther- 
apeutic device  used  as  an  adjunct  to  drug  therapy  in  the  management 
of  bronchial  asthma.  J  Investig  Allergol  Clin  Immunol  1994:4(1): 
23-27. 

22.  Fink  J.  A  comparison  of  Flutter  to  other  airway  clearance  valves:  a 
laboratory  study  (abstract).  Chest  1995:108(3  Pt  2):147S. 

23.  Schlobohm  RM.  Falltrick  RT.  Quan  SF.  Katz  JA.  Lung  volumes. 
mechanics,  and  oxygenation  during  spontaneous  positive-pressure 
ventilation:  the  advantage  ofCPAP  over  EPAP.  Anesthesiology  1981; 
55(4):416-*22. 

24.  Petrof  BJ.  Calderini  E.  Gottfried  SB.  Effect  of  CPAP  on  respiratory 
effort  and  dyspnea  during  e.xercise  in  severe  COPD.  J  .Appl  Physiol 
1 990:69(1):  179- 188. 

25.  Petrof  BJ,  Legare  M,  Godberg  P,  Milic-Emill  J.  Gottfried  SB.  Con- 
tinuous positive  airway  pressure  reduces  work  of  breathing  and  dys- 
pnea during  weaning  from  mechanical  ventilation  in  severe  chronic 
obstructive  pulmonary  disease.  .Am  Re\  Respir  Dis  1990:141(2): 
281-289. 

26.  Mclnturff  SL.  Shaw  LI.  Hodgkin  JE.  Rumble  L.  Bird  FM.  Intrapul- 
monary  percussive  ventilation  (IPV)  in  the  treatment  of  COPD  (ab- 
stract). Respir  Care  I985:30(  10):885. 

27.  Natale  JE.  Pfeifle  J.  Homnick  DN.  Comparison  of  inlramulmonary 
percussive  ventilation  and  chest  physiotherapy:  a  pilot  study  in  pa- 
tients with  cystic  fibrosis.  Chest  I994;105(6):I789-I793. 

28.  Homnick  DN.  White  F.  de  Castro  C.  Comparison  of  effects  of  an 
intrapulmonary  percussive  ventilator  to  standard  aerosol  and  chest 
physiotherapy  in  treatment  of  cystic  fibrosis.  Pediatr  Pulmonol  1995: 
20(  I  ):50-55. 

29.  Newhouse  PA.  White  F.  Marks  JH.  Homnick  DN.  The  intrapulmo- 
nary percussive  ventilator  and  flutter  device  compared  to  standard 
chest  physiotherapy  in  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis.  Clin  Pediatr 
(Phila)  1998:37(71:427-432. 

30.  Davis  KJ.  Hurst  JM.  High  frequency  percussive  ventilation.  ProbI 
Respir  Care  1989:2(  l):.39-t7. 

31.  Hurst  JM,  Branson  RD,  Davis  K  Jr.  High-frequency  percussive  ven- 
tilation in  the  management  of  elevated  intracranial  pressure.  J  Trauma 
I988:28(9):LVi.V1367. 

32.  Cioffi  WG.  Graves  TA,  McManus  WF.  Pruitt  BA  Jr.  High  frequency 
percussive  ventilation  in  patients  with  inhalation  injury.  J  Trauma 
1989:29(31:350-354. 


806 


Rfspirator'i-  Carh  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


High-Frequency  Oscillation  or  thi:  Airway  ano  Ciii;st  Wall 


33.  King  M.  Phillips  DM.  Gross  D.  Vanian  V.  Chang  HK.  Zidulka  A 
EnharKcJ  tracheal  mucus  clearance  with  high  trequency  chest  wall 
compression.  Am  Rev  Respir  Dis  iyS.V.i:S(3l:5II-5l5. 

34.  King  M.  Zidulka  A.  Phillips  DM.  Wight  D.  Gross  D.  Chang  HK. 
Tracheal  mucus  clearance  in  high-freciuency  oscillation:  et'fecl  ol 
peak  now  rate  bias.  Eur  Respir  J  I990:.^(  1  ):6-13. 

35.  Tomkiewic/  RP,  Biviji  A.  King  M.  Effects  of  oscillating  air  How  on 
the  Theological  properties  and  clearability  of  mucous  gel  simulants. 
Biorheology  1  W4;3  \{>):5\\  -520. 

36.  Hansen  LG.  Warwick  WJ.  High-frequency  chest  compression  sys- 
tem to  aid  in  clearance  of  mucus  from  the  lung.  Bionied  Instrum 
Technol  1W0;:4(  4):  289-244. 

Kluft  J.  Beker  L.  Castagnino  M.  Gaiser  J.  Chancy  H.  Lmk  RJ.  A 
comparison  of  bronchial  drainage  treatments  in  cystic  fibrosis.  Pe- 
diatr  Pulmonol  1996;22(4):271-274. 

Arens  R.  Gozal  D.  Omlin  KJ.  Vega  J,  Boyd  KP,  Keens  TG.  Woo 
MS.  Comparison  of  high  frequency  chest  compression  and  conven- 
tional chest  physiotherapy  in  hospitalized  patients  with  cystic  fibro- 
sis. Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  1994;  150(4l;l  154-1 157. 

39.  Fink  JB.  Hess  DR.  Secretion  clearance  techniques.  In:  Hess  DH. 
Maclntyre  NR.  Mishoe  SC.  Gah  in  WF.  Adams  AB.  Saposnick  .\B. 
Respiratory  care:  principles  and  practices.  Philadelphia:  WB  Saun- 
ders: 2002. 


37 


38 


40.  Spitzer  SA.  Fink  G.  Mitlelman  M.  External  high-frequency  ventila- 
tion in  severe  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease.  Chest  1993; 
l(14i(i):l(i9S-  1701. 

41.  SooHooGW,  Ellison  MJ./.hangC.  Williams  AJ.  Bclnuui  MJ.  Ef- 
fects of  external  chest  wall  oscillation  in  stable  COPD  pat- 
ients (abstract).  Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  1994:149(4  Pt  2): 
A637. 

42.  Smithline  HA,  Rivers  EP.  Rady  MY.  Blake  HC,  Nowak  RM.  Bi- 
phasic  e.xtrathoracic  pressure  CPR:  a  human  pilot  study.  Chest  1994; 
105(3):  842-846. 

43.  Segawa  J,  Nakashima  Y.  Kuroiwa  A.  Rikimaru  S.  Kohara  N.  Shiba 
K.  [The  efficacy  of  external  high  frequency  oscillation:  experience  in 
a  quadriplegic  patient  with  alveolar  hypoventilation]  Kokyu  To  Jun- 
kan  1993;41(3):27l-275.  Ankle  in  Japoneu- 

-W.  Gaitini.  Krinierman,  Smorgik.  Gruber,  Verzberger.  External  high 
frequency  ventilation  for  weaning  from  the  mechanical  ventilation. 
Recent  Advances  in  Anaesth.  Pain.  Int  Care  and  Emergency  1990; 
5:137-138. 

45.  Scherer  TA.  Barandun  J.  Martinez  E.  Wanner  A.  Rubin  EM.  Effect 
of  high-frequency  oral  airway  and  chest  wall  oscillation  and  con- 
ventional chest  physical  therapy  on  expectoration  in  patients  with 
stable  cystic  fibrosis.  Chest  1998:1 13i4i:  1019-1027. 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


807 


Airway  Clearance  Techniques  for  the  Patient 
with  an  Artificial  Airway 

Robert  M  Lewis  ND  RN  RRT 

Introduction 

Kffects  of  Artificial  Airways  on  Mucus  Clearance 

Impaired  Mucus  Transport 

Increased  Risk  of  Aspiration 

Abnormal  Bacterial  Colonization 
Goals  of  Airway  Clearance  Techniques  with  the  Intubated  Patient 

Prevent  Catastrophic  Obstruction  of  the  Endotracheal  Tube 

Prevent  or  Reduce  Peripheral  Airway  Obstruction 

Reduce  Infectivity  of  Secretions 
Components  of  Airway  Clearance  Strategies 

Prevent  Secretion  Dehydration 

Reduce  Upper  Airway  and  (Gastrointestinal  Tract  Bacterial  Colonization 

Prevent  Secretion  Accumulation  abo\e  the  Kndotracheal  Tube  Cuff 

Prevent  Aspiration  of  Secretions  from  the  Supra-Cuff  Space 

Prevent  Development  of  Biofilm 

Prevent  Disruption  and  Aspiration  of  the  Biofilm 

Maintain  Patency  of  the  Central  Airway 

Compensate  for  Lack  of  Normal  Cough 

Compensate  for  Lack  of  Spontaneous  Position  Change 
Summary 

Artificial  airways  provide  both  opportunities  and  challenges  to  clinicians  concerned  with  airway 
clearance.  For  example,  the  artificial  airway  provides  direct  access  to  the  lower  airways  for  catheter 
suctioning  of  secretions  and  a  direct  route  for  lung  instillation  of  medications  that  promote  secretion 
mobilization.  At  the  same  time,  the  presence  of  an  artificial  airway  impairs  natural  mechanisms  of 
airway  clearance — coughing  and  mucociliary  function.  Artificial  airwa>s  are  invariably  coated 
with  an  antibiotic-resistant  bacterial  biofilm  that  can  be  introduced  into  the  lung  by  several  com- 
monly applied  airway  clearance  techniques.  This  factor  is  rarely  considered  during  research  on 
airway  clearance  techniques  for  patients  with  artificial  airways.  This  review  summarizes  current 
research  on  airway  clearance  techniques  for  patients  with  artificial  airways,  with  special  attention 
to  the  implications  of  the  bacterial  biofilm.  Directions  for  future  research  are  also  discussed.  Key 
words:  ariificidi  airnay.  airnay  clearance  techniques,  aspiration,  biofilm.  saline  instillation,  secretions, 
siictioiuufi,  ventilator-associated  pi^ewnoitia,  VAP.     [Respir  Care  2002;47(7):808-817] 


Introduction  lion,  phiceincnl  o{ m\  ETT  increases  the  lisiv  ol  pulmonary 

inl'eetioii.  in  part  because  of  the  development  of  a  haeteria- 
The  presence  of  an  endotracheal  tube  (ETT)  impairs  the  rich  biotiim  on  the  interior  and  exterior  surlaces  of  the 
body's  normal  mechanisms  of  airway  clearance.'  In  addi-           tube.-'  Some  generally  accepted  methods  of  secretion  re- 
moval in  the  intubated  patient,  such  as  endotracheal  suc- 
tion.  can  disrupt  the  biofilm  and  introduce  bacteria  into  the 


Robert  M  Lewis  ND  RN  RRT  is  at'l'ilialecl  willi  the  Department  ot  Emer- 
gency Medicine.  Emory  University.  Atlanta.  Georgia. 


Dr  Lewis  presented  a  version  of  ihis  ropun  ai  ihc  17ih  .Xnnual  New  Correspondence:  Rohorl  M  Lewis  ND  RN  RRT,  Department  of  Emer- 

Horizons  Symposium  at  the  47th  Inlernatiiina!  Rcspnatiiry  Congress.  San  gency    Medicine.    Emory     University,     .Atlanta    GA    .■*()-^22.     E-mail: 

Antonio,  Texas,  December  14,2001.  rnilewis2(Xi(?'vahoo.com. 


808  RESPlRATOR^■  Carh  •  July  2002  Voi  47  No  7 


Aikw  \^  Ci  i;aranci:  Ti  (liNion  s  i  ok  mr  Patii.nt  wnii  an  Ariiiiciai   Airway 


lower  airway."*  Other  airway  clearance  techniques,  xiich  as 
chest  wall  percussion  and  \ibration.  may  have  a  similar 
effect.  Introduction  of  bacteria  into  the  airway  of  a  criti- 
cally ill  patient  can  result  in  a  tissue-damat;ini;  mnamma- 
tory  process,  as  well  as  life-lhreatenini;  pneumonia.^  Stud- 
ies of  airway  clearance  techniques  applied  to  the  intubated 
patient  must  therefore  include  nosocomial  pneumonia  as  a 
major  outcome  variable,  as  well  as  the  more  immediate 
effects  of  airway  clearance  procedures  on  other  variables, 
such  as  sputum  volume  and  lung  mechanics. 

Bacterial  infection  of  the  airway  can  also  trigger  a  sys- 
temic mllammalory  response.'"  which  can  result  in  addi- 
tional morbidity  and  extra-pulmon;iry  organ  ilysfunclion. 
These  effects  may  be  hard  to  anticipate  and  identify,  but 
their  presence  could  be  inferred  from  differences  in  overall 
mortality,  length  of  stay,  and  hospital  expenditures.  These 
variables  are  rarely  addressed  in  studies  of  airway  clear- 
ance techniques  applied  to  the  intubated  patient.  This  re- 
view therefore  is  written  from  the  perspective  that  airway 
clearance  techniques  must  be  evaluated  not  only  by  mea- 
suring such  factors  as  \olume  of  sputum  produced  and 
changes  in  pulmonary  function,  but  by  broader  measures. 
such  as  total  mortality  and  length  of  intensi\e  care  unit 
(ICU)  stay. 

An  evaluation  of  airway  clearance  techniques  for  the 
intubated  patient  must  also  recognize  the  role  of  upper 
airway  bacterial  colonization  in  the  pathogenesis  of  ven- 
tilator-associated pneumonia  (VAP).  Therefore,  this  re- 
view is  written  from  the  perspective  that  minimizing  bac- 
terial colonization  of  all  structures  in  the  airway  (including 
the  teeth  and  sinuses)  must  he  addressed  when  evaluating 
airway  clearance  techniques. 

Effects  of  Artificial  Airways  on  Mucus  Clearance 

Impaired  Mucus  Transport 

The  placement  of  an  endotracheal  or  tracheostomy  lube 
presents  both  challenges  and  opportunities  for  those  con- 
cerned with  application  of  airway  clearance  techniques. 
The  artificial  airway,  although  allowing  for  direct  access 
to  the  lower  airway  and  direct  aspiration  of  secretions,  also 
interferes  with  the  body's  own  mechanisms  of  secretion 
clearance.  In  normal  humans,  removal  of  mucus  from  the 
lung  depends  on  the  mucociliary  escalator.  When  mucus 
production  is  excessive,  coughing  is  also  necessary  for 
airway  clearance.  Endotracheal  intubation  interferes  with 
both  of  those  processes. 

The  placement  of  an  ETT  results  in  substantial  damage 
to  the  airway.  Since  it  is  a  foreign  body,  its  presence  in  the 
larynx  and  trachea  stimulates  an  inflammatory  response, 
which  both  increases  mucus  production  and  impairs  ciliary 
action.'  Electron  microscopy  evaluation  of  mucosa  trom 
both  humans  and  animal  models  demonstrates  substantial 


r^hlc  1        t^lTccl'i  ot  Ariiiiciai  Airways  on  Sccrelidn  .'\cciiTiiul:ilion 
anil  Clearance 

Muciiciliary  transport  mtpuircd 

.Secretion  imiiluclion  nicreased 

Hacteriology  ol  secretions  altercil 

.Swallowini!  inipaireii 

Functional  separation  ol  ;jastrointestiiial  tract  and  respiratory  tract 

\ iolaled 
Aspiration  ol  oropharynjical  secretions 
Cough  dynamics  altered 
Muscle  strength  decreased 


deiuidaliiMi  of  cilia  li'om  the  liachea.' '^  Changes  are  great- 
est at  the  site  of  the  ETT  cuff.  The  ETT  is  also  associated 
with  damage  to  the  tracheal  epithelium,  exposing  the  base- 
ment membrane.  Injury  to  this  layer  promotes  bacterial 
adherence  and  colonization." 

The  increased  secretion  of  mucus,  coupled  with  ciliary 
dysfunction  and  damage,  results  in  accumulation  of  secre- 
tions, which  act  as  a  reservoir  for  bacterial  pathogens.  The 
presence  of  bacteria  promotes  a  chronic  inllammatory  state 
in  the  intubated  patient,  with  proteolytic  enzymes  being 
released  by  neutrophils.  This  further  damages  cilia  and  epi- 
thelial cells,  resulting  in  a  cycle  of  further  infection,  in- 
creased mucus  productit)n.  and  continuing  airway  damage.' 

Cough  is  substantially  impaired  when  an  ETT  is  in  place. 
Glottic  closure  is  prevented,  so  the  patient  is  unable  to 
generate  the  pressure  required  for  the  "explosive"  phase  of 
the  cough.  In  addition,  because  of  the  increased  work  of 
breathing  imposed  by  the  tube,  the  patient  may  be  unable 
to  inspire  a  sufficiently  large  tidal  \i)lume  to  generate  an 
effective  cough.  The  increased  work  of  breathing  may  lead 
to  respiratory  muscle  fatigue,  further  limiting  the  effec- 
tiveness of  the  cough.  An  ETT  also  bypasses  the  airway's 
normal  humidifying  mechanisms,  which  increases  secre- 
tion viscosity,  which  further  burdens  the  normal  mucus 
clearance  processes. 

Increased  Risk  of  Aspiration 

Another  consequence  of  ETT  placement  is  interference 
with  the  nomial  functional  separation  of  the  gastrointesti- 
nal and  respiratory  tracts.  Inability  to  close  the  glottis,  as 
well  as  the  presence  of  the  tube  in  the  oropharynx,  pre- 
vents the  patient  from  swallowing,  so  oropharyngeal  con- 
tents can  more  easily  enter  the  lungs.  If.  because  of  vom- 
iting or  gastroesophageal  lellux.  acidic  gastric  contents 
enter  the  oropharynx,  aspiration  into  the  lungs  can  result, 
and  acid  injury  to  the  airway  mucosa  can  further  perpet- 
uate the  inflammatory  cycle.  As  well,  acid-induced  airway 
injury  increases  the  ability  of  bacteria  to  adhere  to  cells.'" 
Table  I  summarizes  the  effects  of  artificial  airways  on 
secretion  clearance. 


Respiratory  Care  •  Juey  2002  Voi  47  No  7 


809 


AlRWA^'  Cl.HARANCE  TECHNIQUES  FOR  THE  PaTIENT  WITH   AN  ARTlFiriAL  AlkWAY 


Fig.  1.  Scanning  electron  microscopic  image  of  a  Staphylococcal 
biofilm  from  an  endotracheal  tube.  (Courtesy  Professor  Sean  P 
Gorman,  School  of  Pharmacy,  Queen's  University  of  Belfast,  Bel- 
fast. United  Kingdom.) 

Abnormal  Bacterial  Colonization 

Another  problem  relutcd  to  the  presence  of  an  artificial 
airway  is  the  development  of  a  bacteria-rich  biofilm  on  the 
interior  and  exterior  surfaces  of  the  tube.  This  biofilm. 
composed  of  a  dense  matrix  of  polysaccharides,  bacteria, 
and  white  blood  cells  (Fig.  1),  can  be  detected  in  ETTs 
several  hours  after  intubation.'  Antibiotics  and  other  host 
immune  factors  cannot  penetrate  the  ETT,  so  the  bacterial 
concentration  can  increase  unchecked.  The  biofiltn  thus 
acts  as  a  reservoir  for  iiifoction/rc-infection  of  the  intu- 
bated patient. 

The  bacteria  colonizing  the  biolilm  may  come  from  the 
gastrointestinal  tract."'-  Delayed  gastric  emptying,  in- 
creased gastric  pH  due  to  stress  ulcer  prophylaxis,  and  the 
presence  of  gastric  tubes  all  contribute  to  multiplication 
and  migration  of  these  organisms  into  the  oropharynx.'' 
Oropharyngeal  secretions  in  turn  migrate  along  the  ETT, 
pooling  in  the  space  above  the  inflated  ETT  cuff.  Inter- 
mittent aspiration  of  these  secretions  past  the  cuff  results 
in  colonization  of  the  lower  airway,  including  the  portion 
of  the  airway  immediately  below  the  ETT  opening.  There- 
after, the  interior  lumen  of  the  ETT  is  colonized  and  the 
biofilm  forms  and  grows  cephalad.' 

Organisms  commonly  found  in  the  ETT  biofilm  include 
Pseiidomonas  aeruginosa.  Staphylococcus  aureus.  Enlero- 
coccus  faecalis,  and  Candida  species.-  The  biofilm  bacte- 
ria transform  into  highly  antibiotic-resistant  forms,  even 
though  the  parent  organisms  in  the  lower  airway  may  re- 
main antibiotic-sensitive.  This  transfornwtion  appears  to 
be  mediated  by  quorum  sensing  and  alterations  of  gene 
expression  and  protein  production."  Table  2  summarizes 
the  clinically  relevant  features  of  ETT  biofilms.  Since  pre- 
vention of  bacterial  infection  is  an  important  goal  of  an\ 
airway  clearance  technique  in  the  patient  with  an  artificial 
airway,  the  presence  of  the  biofilm  is  obviously  important 
in  planning  and  evaluating  care  (if  the  intubated  patient. 


Table  2.       Bacterial  Biofilms  in  Endotracheal  Tubes 

General  Characlerislics 

•  BiotHni  noted  in  endotracheal  tube  within  hours  of  intubation 

•  Composed  of  white  blood  cells,  bacteria,  and  polysaccharides 

•  Highly  antibiotic-resistant 
.Sequence  of  Development 

1.  Bacteria  colonize  stomach  and  oropharynx 

2.  Bacteria  colonize  trachea  and  exterior  of  endotracheal  tube 

3.  Secretions  aspirated  around  cuff  -^  lower  airway  colonization 

4.  Retrograde  colonization  of  interior  of  endotracheal  lube 

5.  Rapid  development  of  biotllm 

6.  Rapid  development  of  antibiotic  resistance 


Hagler  and  Traver*  demonstrated  that  generally  accepted 
suctioning  practices  can  result  in  subslantial  contamina- 
tion of  the  lower  airway.  They  showed  that  passing  a 
suction  catheter  through  the  ETT  can  disrupt  the  biofilm, 
releasing  up  to  60, (MM)  colonies  of  bacteria  into  the  airway. 
Instillation  of  a  small  amount  of  saline  into  the  ETT  in- 
creased the  number  of  colonies  dislodged  to  310.000. 

Aspiration  of  those  large  numbers  of  antibiotic-resistant 
organisms  can  result  in  pneumonia,  or,  at  the  very  least, 
exacerbation  of  the  airway  inflammation  associated  with 
intubation.  Focusing  on  short-term  results  of  airway  clear- 
ance techniques,  such  as  volume  of  secretions  removed. 
effects  on  lung  mechanics,  or  effects  on  oxygenation,  ig- 
nores the  impact  of  these  techniques  on  the  biofilm.  To 
properly  determine  the  role  of  any  given  technique  in  the 
care  of  the  intubated  patient,  studies  must  account  for  the 
possible  effects  of  increased  risk  of  infection  inherent  to 
the  technique.  Such  an  approach  has  generally  been  lack- 
ing in  the  respiratory  and  critical  care  literature.  Even  less 
attention  has  been  paid  to  techniques  designed  to  prevent 
or  remove  the  biofilm.  which  should  be  an  explicit  goal  of 
airway  clearance  strategies  for  the  intubated  patient. 

Goals  of  Airway  Clearance  Techniques 
for  the  Intubated  Patient 

Our  collective  experience  with  care  of  intubated  pa- 
tients allows  us  to  formulate  several  goals  for  airway  clear- 
ance techniques.  Table  3  summarizes  how  these  goals  re- 
late to  the  location,  quality,  and  quantity  of  airway 
secretions. 

Prevent  Catastrophic  Obstruction  of  the 
Endotracheal  Tube 

Death  or  disabilitv  resulting  from  obstruction  of  an  ETT 
should  he  a  rare  event.  Achieving  this  goal  requires  ad- 
ilivssing  the  location  of  secretions:  that  is,  ensuring  they 
do  not  accumulate  in  the  ETT.  Suctioning  of  the  ETT  and 
airway  humidification  are  the  main  techniques  employed 


810 


Ri'SPiRATORV  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Airway  Ci.f.arancf.  Techniques  for  rm  Paiiint  wtiii  an  Ariii  ici  \i  Airway 


Table  3.      Goals  of  Airway  Clearance  Tochnii|ues  in  Paiienis  with 
ArtiTicial  Airways 

Prevent  catastrophic  obstruction  ol  endotracheal  tube  (relates  to 

location  of  secretions) 
Reduce  peripheral  airway  obstruction 

•  Decrease  work  of  breathing  and  inipro\c  \cntilalion/pcrlusion 
ratio  (relates  to  quantity  of  secretionsi 

Reduce  infecti\  ity  of  secretions 

•  Bacterial  quantit\  and  antihimic  resistance  (relates  to  quality  ol 
secretions) 


Table  4.      Components  of  Airwa\  Clearance  Strategies 

Prevent  mucus  dehydration 

Prevent  upper  airway  and  gastrouitcstuial  tract  colonization 

Reduce  supra-cuff  secretion  accuiiuilalion 

Prevent  aspiration  around  cull 

Limit  development  of  the  bacterial  hiofilni 

Prevent  disruption  and  aspiration  of  the  biofilrn 

Maintain  patency  of  the  central  airway 

Compensate  for  lack  of  natural  cough 

Compensate  for  reduced  posture  change 


to  achieve  this  goal.  However,  each  of  these  techniques 
iiitri)diiccs  new  prohlenis.  which  v\ili  be  discussed  below. 

Prevent  or  Reduce  Peripheral  .Airway  Obstruction 

Retained  secretions  in  the  distal  airway.s  increase  airway 
resistance  and  work  of  breathing.  The.se  effects  are  most 
closely  related  to  the  quantity  of  secretions  present  in  the 
lung.  Airway  clearance  techniques  must  therefore  be  ca- 
pable of  removing  adequate  quantities  of  secretions  from 
the  airways. 

Reduce  Infectivity  of  Secretions 

Secretions  contaminated  with  infectious  pathogens,  re- 
gardless of  their  quantity  or  location,  will  trigger  an  in- 
tlammatory  response  leading  to  tissue  injury  or  destruc- 
tion. Airway  clearance  techniques  therefore  must  address 
the  capability  of  secretions  to  initiate  or  escalate  an  in- 
flammatory response. 

Components  of  Airway  Clearance  Strategies 

To  meet  the  goals  outlined  above,  airway  clearance  tech- 
niques must  accomplish  the  tasks  listed  in  Table  4,  which 
are  described  in  detail  below. 

Prevent  Secretion  Dehydration 

This  is  achieved  primaril)  b\  ensuring  humiditication 
of  the  inspired  air.  Water  vapor  can  be  added  to  the  in- 


spired air  with  a  heated  humiiiit'ier.  or  water  loss  can  be 
prevented  by  the  use  of  a  heat  and  moisture  exchanger 
(HME). 

The  heated  Initiiidii'icr  is  the  most  widely  employed  lech- 
nic|iie  lor  Inimidifyiiig  secretions.  However,  when  used  in 
coiijunction  with  mechanical  \ciuilaiors.  water  may  accu- 
mulate in  the  ventilator  circuit  or  condense  in  the  ETT  and 
be  aspirated  into  the  lung,  introducing  bacteria  into  the 
lung.  These  bacteria  may  be  exogenous  contaminates  of 
the  ventilator  tubing  or  endogenous  bacteria  from  the  bio- 
film  in  the  ETT. ' ' 

The  problem  of  condensate  is  avoided  vsith  an  HME, 
though  humidification  with  an  HME  has  tiot  been  shown 
to  be  equivalent  to  that  with  a  heated  humidifier.  Early 
studies  of  HMEs  suggest  they  may  decrease,'''  or  at  least 
not  increase"  the  risk  of  lower  airway  colonization  and 
VAP.  However,  some  investigators  have  reported  poten- 
tially catastrophic  obstruction  of  the  ETT,  especially  when 
an  HME  is  used  with  a  patient  who  produces  e.xcessive 
secretions. '"  '  ^  Other  studies  have  not  reported  similar  prob- 
lems, however."* 

Another  technique  widely  employed  to  hydrate  and  mo- 
bilize mucus  is  regular  instillation  of  small  amounts  of 
normal  saline  into  the  ETT  prior  to  suctioning.  This  prac- 
tice is  nearly  universally  employed  in  the  care  of  intubated 
patients,  although  data  supporting  its  use  are  lacking.  In  2 
recent  reviews,  no  evidence  was  found  that  routine  saline 
instillation  provided  any  physiologic  benefit,  and  in  fact  it 
might  contribute  to  hypoxemia.'"-"  Hagler  and  Traver's"* 
findings  imply  that  saline  instillation,  by  dislodging  bac- 
teria, can  contribute  to  pulmonary  inflammation  and  VAP. 
though  that  hypothesis  has  not  yet  been  confirmed  clini- 
cally. 

Implications  for  Research.  Variables  such  as  the  vol- 
ume of  secretions  removed  and  blood  gas  values  inay  not 
be  the  appropriate  outcome  measures  for  studying  the  short- 
term  effects  of  saline  instillation.  As  well,  no  data  have 
been  published  on  the  effects  of  saline  instillation  on  en- 
dotracheal intubation  hazards  such  as  tube  obstruction, 
atelectasis,  or  VAP.  Many  studies  of  saline  instillation 
have  included  patients  with  minimal  secretions,  who  are 
unlikely  to  benefit  from  this  technique.  Although  some 
commentators  have  advocated  abandoning  saline  instilla- 
tion, to  date  no  reports  have  been  published  indicating  that 
saline  instillation  can  be  abandoned  without  untoward  ef- 
fects. 

Though  evidence  is  lacking  to  support  routine  use  of 
normal  saline  instillation  as  a  means  of  secretion  removal 
in  the  intubated  patient,  other  solutions  may  ultimately 
prove  beneficial.  For  example,  nasal  irrigation  with  hyper- 
tonic saline,  but  not  normal  saline,  significantly  improves 
naso-sinus  mucus  clearance."'  The  effects  of  hypertonic 
saline  irrigation  on  lower  airw  ay  mucus  clearance  deserves 


Respiratory  Carh  •  ivi,\  2002  Vol  47  Nf)  7 


811 


Airway  Ci.f.arancf.  Tf.chniquhs  fok  tiii  Patii;nt  with  an  Artificial  Airway 


investigaticin.  Furthermore,  hypertonic  saline  (but  not  nor- 
mal saline)  aerosol  therapy  increases  sputum  expectora- 
tion in  cystic  fibrosis  patients,  with  no  evidence  of  unto- 
ward effects.--  Finally,  hypertonic  saline-soaked  dressings 
applied  for  brief  periods  to  infected  wounds  of  dialysis 
patients  speeds  healing  in  patients  with  antibiotic-resistant 
organisms.-'  Could  hypertonic  saline  instillation  exert  a 
similar  beneficial  effect  on  the  antibiotic-resistant  ETT 
biofilm? 


Reduce  I'pper  Airway  and  Gastrointestinal  Tract 
Bacterial  Colonization 


Ventilator-associated  pneiinmnia  today  is  seldom  the 
result  of  primary  inoculation  of  the  lower  airway  with 
exogenous  pathogens.  Rather.  VAP  typically  results  from 
organisms  that  are  first  detectable  in  either  the  gastroin- 
testinal tract  or  the  oropharynx.  Studies  have  suggested 
that  the  pathogenic  bacteria  migrate  from  the  upper  gas- 
trointestinal tract  to  the  oropharynx,  pool  above  the  ETT 
cuff,  and  are  then  aspirated  into  the  lower  airway.' "'- 
The  first  step  in  this  process  may  be  partially  the  result  of 
aggressive  strategies  to  reduce  gastrointestinal  bleeding  in 
the  critically  ill  patient,  through  the  use  of  proton  pump 
inhibitors  or  H-2  blockers.  The  resulting  increase  in  gastric 
pH  favors  the  growth  of  pathogenic  bacteria.--"  In  contrast, 
providing  gastric  protection  with  sucralfate,  which  does 
not  alter  gastric  pH,  decreases  the  risk  of  VAP.--* 

Some  investigators  have  attempted  to  prevent  upper  air- 
way contamination  by  enteric  organisms  with  the  use  of 
prone  positioning,  which  prevents  or  limits  reflux  of  gas- 
tric contents.  One  study  of  86  patients  found  a  lower  rate 
of  VAP  and  mortality  with  prone  positioning.-'^ 

The  sinuses  can  be  another  bacteria  reservoir,  and  sinus 
bacterial  contamination  increases  the  risk  of  VAP.  This  is 
especially  true  when  nasotracheal  tubes  are  used.-^-''  so 
orotracheal  intubation  has  been  recommended  as  a  means 
to  reduce  nosocomial  sinusitis.-' 

Other  mechanisms  exist  whereby  the  lower  airway  can 
be  contaminated  with  organisms  from  the  upper  airway. 
The  potential  role  of  bacterial  infection  of  the  dental  struc- 
tures in  intubated  patients  has  recently  been  explored.  Four- 
rier  et  al-**  prospectively  evaluated  the  amount  of  dental 
plaque  present  in  intubated  ICU  patients.  The  amount  of 
dental  plaque  increased  significantly  during  the  ICU  stay, 
as  did  the  amount  and  variety  of  oral  pathogens.  Coloni- 
zation of  plaque  with  pathogenic  bacteria  was  highly  cor- 
related with  the  development  of  VAP  and  bacteremia. 

Implications  for  Research.  The  finding  that  coloniza- 
tion or  infection  of  the  sinuses  and  dental  structures  ma\ 
contribute  to  VAP  suggests  that  the  overall  question  of 
care  of  the  nasal  passages,  oral  cavity,  and  sinuses  in  the 


intubated  patient  should  be  more  widely  addressed.  For 
example,  should  suction  catheters,  once  used  to  suction  the 
ETT  or  lower  airway,  be  used  to  suction  the  nares?  Classic 
teachings  in  respiratory  care  stress  that  catheters  used  in 
the  nasopharynx  or  oropharynx  should  not  be  used  to  suc- 
tion the  lower  airway.  However,  the  reverse  practice  is 
generally  accepted.  v\hich  may  introduce  microorganisms 
from  the  ETT  that  are  not  yet  present  in  large  numbers  in 
other  parts  of  the  airway.  These  organisms  can  multiply  in 
the  sinuses  or  dental  structures  of  an  immunocompromised 
patient,  leading  to  sepsis  and  creating  a  reservoir  for  in- 
fection or  re-infection  of  the  lower  airway. 

The  potential  benefit  of  pre\enting  or  treating  sinusitis 
in  the  intubated  patient  is  suggested  by  a  study  by  Holz- 
aplcl  et  al.  who  observed  a  20%  decrease  in  mortality 
among  ventilated  patients  when  a  protocol  for  identifica- 
tion and  treatment  of  sinusitis  was  implemented.-'' 

Oral  hygiene  is  difficult  in  the  orally  intubated,  criti- 
cally ill  patient.  At  best,  care  is  limited  to  superficial  cleans- 
ing with  soft  sponge-type  brushes.  More  vigorous  means 
of  dental  hygiene  are  difficult  to  use.  However,  in  theory, 
reduction  of  oropharyngeal  bacterial  load,  through  more 
vigorous  methods  of  dental  hygiene  aimed  at  deep  clean- 
ing, may  prove  beneficial  in  reducing  sources  of  infection. 
The  efficacy  of  incorporating  dental  hygienists.  at  least  in 
a  consultative  capacity,  in  the  care  of  \entilated  patients 
warrants  study. 

Prevent  Secretion  Accumulation  above  the 
Endotracheal  Tube  Cuff 

Secretions  easily  accumulate  in  the  space  abo\e  the  ETT 
cuff.  Radiologic  studies  suggest  that  up  to  10  niL  may  be 
present  at  any  time,'"  and  aspiration  of  small  amounts  into 
the  lower  airway  is  unavoidable  with  conventional  ETTs 
and  cuffs."  The  Hi-Lo  Evac  tube  (Nellcor  Puritan  Ben- 
nett/Tyco Healthcare.  Pleasanton.  California)  is  designed 
to  address  this  problem;  it  has  a  suction  port  open  to  the 
area  where  secretions  accumulate  (Fig.  2)  and  through 
which  secretions  can  be  continuously  or  intermittently  as- 
pirated. Trials  with  this  tube  show  that  it  reduces  the  risk 
of  VAP."'-'2-'-' 

Implications  for  Research.  Trials  of  continuous  subglot- 
tic secretion  aspiration  need  to  be  extended  to  larger  and 
more  diverse  groups.  An  additional  method  that  may  pro\e 
useful  in  preventing  accumulation  of  secretions  in  the  su- 
pra-cuff  space  is  suggested  by  a  case  study,  reported  by 
Fung  et  al.  of  removal  of  a  foreign  body  in  the  airway. ■'•' 
They  successfully  removed  an  aspirated  tooth  that  was 
lodged  outside  the  ETT  at  the  level  of  the  cuff,  by  deflat- 
ing the  cuff  dining  manual  hyperinfiation.  This  resulted  in 
increased  cephalad  air  fiow  past  the  cuff,  which  carried  the 
aspirated  tooth  to  the  pharynx,  where  it  was  remo\ed.  In 


812 


Re.spir  VTORY  Care  •  Jll'i-  2002  Vof  47  No  7 


Airway  Ci.faranci:  Tkchniquks  ior  tiii  Patiivi  with  w  Aurii  iciai  Airway 


Fig.  2.  Hi-Lo  Evac  endotracheal  tube  (Nellcor  Puritan  Bennett/ 
Tyco  Healthcare.  Pleasanton,  California).  The  suction  port  allows 
suctioning  secretions  that  pool  above  the  cuff.  (Courtesy  of  Nell- 
cor Puritan  Bennett) 


theory,  this  approach  would  also  result  in  cephalad  move- 
ment of  secretions  From  the  supra-cutf  space  to  the  oro- 
pharynx, for  easy  removal.  Such  an  approach  deserves  a 
trial  in  a  clinical  setting. 

Prevent  Aspiration  of  Secretions  from  the  Supra- 
Cuff  Space 

If  accumulation  of  secretions  abo\e  the  cuff  cannot  be 
prevented,  then  efforts  to  prevent  their  aspiration  may  be 
helpful.  Maintaining  cuff  pressure  at  20  mm  Hg  signifi- 
cantly reduces  the  risk  of  aspiration.''  However,  the  long- 
term  safety  of  this  technique,  especially  in  hypotensive 
patients,  is  unknown. 

Another  technique  of  interest  was  presented  by  Blunt  et 
al.'^  With  an  in  vitro  model  they  demonstrated  that  lubri- 
cating the  ETT  cuff  with  a  water-soluble  gel  prt)duces  an 
effective  mechanical  barrier  to  aspiration.  It  is  unclear  if 
this  technique  can  be  applied  to  patients  who  arc  intubated 
long-term. 

Other  investigators  ha\c  explored  ihc  characteristics  of 
the  ETT  cuff  itselt  in  preventing  or  promoting  aspiration. 


liiflalion  of  a  I'loppy.  large-volume,  low-pressure  cuff  re- 
sults in  the  formation  of  channels  between  the  cuff  and  the 
tracheal  wall,  through  which  aspiration  of  secretions  oc- 
curs. '"  Elimination  of  those  channels  by  cuff  inllation  pres- 
sure of  2()-.'^()  mm  Hg  and  the  use  of  cuffs  designed  to 
prevent  the  creation  of  channels  reduce  the  possibility  of 
aspiration,"  but  iho.sc  studies  diil  not  address  the  potential 
for  tracheal  wall  damage. 

Iniplication.s  for  Research.  Endotracheal  suclionmg  in- 
creases the  pressure  gradient  between  supra-cuff  pooled 
secretions  and  the  lower  airway  and  thus  might  increase 
the  risk  of  aspiration  around  the  cuff.  Documentation  of 
this  in  vivo  would  help  to  clarify  the  risks  and  benefits  of 
suctioning,  and  perhaps  encourage  the  development  of  ETT 
cuffs  that  limit  the  risk  of  aspiration. 

Prevent  Deveh)pnient  of  Biofllm 

Either  chemical  or  mechanical  means  could,  in  theory, 
be  employed  to  prevent  the  development  of  the  biofilm  in 
the  ETT.  Preliminary  studies  showed  that  impregnating  or 
coating  the  ETT  with  silver  inhibits  bacterial  growth.'* 

Trawoger  et  af'  reported  success  in  preventing  biofilm 
in  an  animal  model,  using  intratracheal  pulmonary  venti- 
lation. This  technique  requires  an  ETT  that  has  a  lumen 
incorporated  into  the  wall  of  the  tube  and  through  which 
saline  can  be  flushed  on  a  continuous  basis.  The  opening 
of  this  channel  directs  the  saline  cephalad  (Fig.  3).  They 
found  that  use  of  this  technique  in  animals  prevented  the 
development  of  the  biofilm  and  also  eliminated  the  need 
for  suctioning. 

Implications  for  Research.  Mechanical  techniques,  such 
as  brushing  or  scraping  the  internal  lumen  of  the  ETT, 
with  the  aim  of  preventing  or  removing  the  biofilm.  should 
be  "bench  tested"  and  subjected  to  clinical  trials.  Like- 
wise, continuous  Hushing  of  the  ETT  with  saline,  as  de- 
scribed in  the  study  by  Trawoger  et  al.'''  should  be  studied 
in  humans. 

Prevent  Disruption  and  Aspiration  of  the  Biotllm 

If  development  of  the  biofilm  cannot  be  prevented,  then 
at  least  attempts  should  be  made  to  prevent  its  disruption 
and  consequent  aspiration.  Suctioning  and  saline  instilla- 
tion can  dislodge  antibiotic-resistant  bacteria  into  the  air- 
way.'* but  these  techniques  are  universally  einployed  in 
both  adult  and  pediatric  ICUs.  which  undoubtedly  has  con- 
sequences for  the  critically  ill  patient.  Even  if  pneumonia 
is  avoided,  bacterial  colonization  can  peipetuate  infiam- 
matioii  and  delay  recovery. 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


813 


Airway  Clearance  Techniques  fcir  tiii  Patient  with  an  Artimcial  Airway 


A 


C 


Liquefieo  mucus 


D 


Fig.  3.  Transport  of  mucus  deposits  in  in  vitro  experiments.  A. 
Infused  saline  is  dispersed  into  small  droplets,  exiting  ttie  reverse- 
thrust  catheter.  B.  Saline  droplets  form  a  thin  layer  of  liquid  on  the 
inner  surface  of  the  endotracheal  tube  (ETT).  C.  The  layer  of  saline 
is  transported  cephalad  by  the  intratracheal  pulmonary  ventilation 
gas  flow.  A  small  sample  of  mucus  is  introduced  at  the  tip  of  the 
ETT.  D.  Mucus  is  liquified  and  transported  cephalad  together  with 
the  saline.  Mucus  and  saline  are  expelled  from  the  ETT.  (From 
Reference  39.  with  permission.) 


Can  chest  wall  percussion,  when  used  to  dislodiie  mucus 
from  the  airways,  also  loosen  the  biot'ilm? 

Maintain  Patency  of  the  Central  Airway 

Mucus  accumulaiion  with  partial  or  complete  plugging 
of  the  ETT  can  occur  despite  meticulous  attention  to  hu- 
miditication  and  routine  suctioning  with  either  open  or 
closed  suction  systems.'"  This  phenomenon  has  not  been 
systematically  explored,  but  it  is  usually  attributed  to  in- 
adequate humidification. 

A  recent  report  suggests  that  the  incidence  of  tube  oc- 
clusion may  be  increasing  and  may  be  related  to  the  use  of 
HMEs.'"  Reports  on  the  safety  of  HMEs  are  conflicting. 
The  risk  of  tube  occlusion  with  HMEs  may  be  inediated  by 
host  factors  such  as  the  magnitude  of  ongoing  inflainma- 
tion  processes  in  the  airway  and  the  volume  of  .secretions. 
Other  aspects  of  patient  care,  such  as  systemic  hydration, 
undoubtedly  play  a  role  as  well. 

Partial  or  complete  obstruction  of  an  ETT  can  be  rem- 
edied by  replacing  the  tube,  but  this  is  not  always  possible. 
Emergency  restoration  of  patency,  using  a  balloon-tipped 
arterial  embolectomy  catheter,  has  been  reported  in  a  pa- 
tient in  whom  reintubation  was  considered  hazardous.-"' 
Since  reintubation  is  a  known  risk  factor  for  VAP,-"  more 
widespread  use  of  that  technique  may  limit  the  develop- 
ment of  VAP. 

Implications  tor  Research.  Fear  of  ETT  occlusion  prob- 
ably prompts  much  of  the  routine  suctioning  and  saline 
instillation  in  the  ICU.  If  these  practices  are  to  be  ratio- 
nali/ed.  caretakers  must  be  con\inced  that  restriction  of 
these  procedures  in  the  ICU  will  not  increase  the  risk  of 
tube  obstruction.  Clarifying  the  etiology  of  ETT  obstruc- 
tion will  help  in  the  formulation  of  novel  strategies  for 
maintaining  airway  patency. 

Compensate  for  Lacli  of  Normal  Cough 


Implications  for  Research.  Studies  are  needed  to  exam- 
ine the  effects  of  eliminating  routine  saline  instillation  as 
part  of  the  suctioning  procedure,  as  well  as  trials  of  re- 
ducing the  frequency  of  suctioning. 

Given  the  finding  that  passage  of  a  suction  catheter 
dislodges  bacteria  into  the  airway,  the  common  teaching 
that  suction  should  be  applied  only  when  withdrawing  the 
catheter  should  be  reconsidered.  Could  applying  suction 
while  inserting  the  catheter  result  in  removal  of  the  dis- 
lodged fragments  of  the  biofilm?  The  possible  role  of  other 
procedures  in  disruption  and  aspiration  of  the  biofilm  should 
also  be  explored.  Does  mo\ing  the  patient  from  side  to 
side  cause  movement  of  the  liTT  and  biofilm  disruption? 


An  intubated  patient  is  unable  to  cough  effectively,  ei- 
ther because  of  the  presence  of  the  ETT  or  because  of  the 
illnesses  necessitating  the  tube's  use.  This  may  be  the 
result  of  inability  to  take  and  hold  a  deep  breath,  inability 
to  close  the  glottis,  and/or  inability  to  forcibly  exhale. 
Compensatory  actions  include  provision  of  a  deep  breath 
(manual  hyperinflation),  simulation  of  glottic  closure  (in- 
flation hold),  and  assisted  expiration  (chest  or  abdominal 
wall  compression). 

Manual  hy|ierinflation  (bagging,  coupled  with  an  in- 
spiratory hold  and  unobstructed  expiration)  is  employed  to 
simulate  a  cough  in  intubated  patients.  Only  recently  have 
serious  efforts  been  made  to  demonstrate  the  utility  of  this 
technique.  Ntoumenopoulus  et  aP-  showed  that  VAP  can 
be  delayed  or  reduced  by  employing  such  techniques  in 


814 


Re.spiraiorv  Cari:«  JiLV  2002  Vol.  47  No  7 


Airway  Clearance  Techniques  for  the  Patient  with  an  Artiiiciai  Airway 


trauma  patients.  A  study  with  chiklrcn  ilcmtnistratecl  rapiti 
iiiipro\onicnl  in  atelectasis  \\ hen  manual  inflation  was  useil 
in  conjunction  w  ith  saline  instillation  and  chest  wall  com- 
pression i>n  exhalalion." 

Manual  liyperinnation  m.iN  he  hazardous  in  certain  pa- 
tients, however,  such  as  those  with  intracranial  hyperten- 
sion or  severely  reduced  linij;  compliance."" 

Endotracheal  suctioning;  can  also  be  conceived  of  as  a 
technique  to  compensate  for  lack  of  elTective  cough.  En- 
dotracheal suctioning  removes  secretiims  from  the  central 
airways,  so  most  research  has  focused  on  reducing  hazards 
associated  with  endotracheal  suctioning,  rather  than  on 
improving  the  volume  ol  secretions  removed.  Early  re- 
search on  the  ICU  application  of  suctioning  focused  on  its 
effects  on  acute  cardiopulmonary  changes.  A  full  review 
of  those  studies  is  beyond  the  scope  of  this  review,  but  it 
is  clear  that  closed  suction  systems  are  superior  to  open 
systems  in  this  regard.-*^  Furthermore,  some  studies  sug- 
gest that  closed  suction  systems  may  be  superior  to  open 
systems  in  preventing  VAP."*"  The  most  obvious  explana- 
tion is  that  the  closed  system's  catheter  is  less  likely  to  be 
contaminated  by  bacteria  from  the  environment.  However, 
other  factors,  such  as  less  motion  of  the  ventilator  tubing 
(and  spillage  of  condensate),  may  be  important  as  well. 
Using  closed  suction  systems  for  se\  eral  days  before  chang- 
ing trather  than  daily  changes)  has  not  been  shown  to 
increase  the  risk  of  VAP.-*^  The  reuse  of  conventional 
catheters  for  up  to  24  hours  was  found  to  be  safe  in  a 
limited  study  in  a  pediatric  ICU.^** 

Another  approach  to  limiting  hazards  associated  with 
suctioning  is  to  limit  the  frequency  of  suctioning.  Two 
studies  from  neonatal  ICUs  have  addressed  this  approach. 
Both  found  that  the  frequency  of  routine  suctioning  could 
be  reduced  from  every  4  hours  to  every  8  hoiu's  without 
untoward  effects.^''  '^"  Similar  studies  from  adult  ICUs  have 
not  been  published. 

Endotracheal  suctioning  can  also  directly  damage  the 
bronchial  mucosa.  Newborns  appear  to  be  especially  vul- 
nerable to  mucosal  damage,  with  bronchial  stenosis  devel- 
oping in  some  patients  as  a  result.^'  Using  an  animal  model. 
Bailey  et  aP-  demonstrated  that  mucosal  damage  could 
be  eliminated  by  not  inserting  the  catheter  beyond  the  tip 
of  the  ETT.  That  finding  prompted  many  neonatal  ICUs  to 
modify  suctioning  techniques.  However,  there  are  no  pub- 
lished data  establishing  that  limiting  suctioning  in  this  fash- 
ion does  not  increase  the  risk  of  tube  obstruction. 

Limiting  suction  pressure  is  commonly  recommended 
to  avoid  damaging  the  bronchial  mucosa.  Recently.  Kapur 
et  al-'^''  demonstrated  that  routine  use  of  suction  pressures  in 
excess  of  -140  mm  Hg  greatly  increases  the  incidence  of 
mucosal  injury. 

In  part  to  prevent  hypoxemia,  it  is  commonly  recom- 
mended that  the  ratio  of  the  outside  diameter  of  the  suction 
catheter  to  the  inside  diameter  of  the  ETT  be  ^  0.5.  How- 


ever. .Singh  el  al.'^'  in  a  study  of  intubated  chiklren.  found 
that  increasing  that  ratio  to  0.7  resulteil  in  greater  secretion 
removal,  without  ailverse  canliovascular  changes.  The  ef- 
fects on  mucosal  liauma  anil  risk  of  infection  were  not 
studieil. 

Direct  aspiration  of  secretions  can  also  be  accomplished 
by  rigid  or  llexible  bronchoscopy.  A  rigid  bronchoscope  is 
more  efficient  at  suctioning  secretions  but  less  useful  in 
treating  obstructions  of  ilie  upper  lobes.  Conversely,  flex- 
ible bronchoscopes  can  be  maneuvered  to  reach  a  larger 
nmiiber  of  airways  but  hav  e  smaller  and  less  efficient  suc- 
tion channels. ^"^  Bronchoscopy  may  be  especially  useful 
following  airway  surgery,  when  blind  suctioning  may  dis- 
rupt sutures. 

Compensate  for  Lack  of  Spontaneous  Position 
Change 

Critically  ill  patients  with  ETTs  are  often  unable  to 
move  spontaneously,  as  a  result  of  either  their  illness  or 
therapy.  Humans  partly  rely  on  spontaneous  position  change 
to  maintain  airway  clearance,  so  when  a  patient  cannot 
move  spontaneously,  secretion  retention  results.  Periodic 
position  change  is  a  standard  of  patient  care  but  is  very 
labor  intensive  and  can  result  in  injury  to  health  care  per- 
sonnel. Automated  devices  for  changing  patient  position 
would  therefore  seem  to  be  useful,  and  could  result  in 
more  frequent  and  more  pronounced  position  changes. 

Kinetic  therapy  (or  automatic  lateral  rotation)  is  the  term 
used  to  describe  the  use  of  a  special  bed  that  periodically 
rotates  (40  degrees  or  more)  from  side  to  side.  This  device 
reduces  the  risk  of  and  aids  in  the  resolution  of  atelectasis 
in  both  intubated  and  noninlubated  patients.^'' 

Summary 

Biological  changes  associated  with  the  use  of  artificial 
airways  require  the  ICU  team  to  employ  techniques  to 
prevent  or  alleviate  secretion  accumulation.  These  tech- 
niques are  usually  evaluated  by  their  effects  on  the  volume 
of  secretions  removed  or  on  their  immediate  effects  on 
pulmonary  function,  but  that  approach  ignores  the  poten- 
tial for  these  techniques  to  cause  airway  infection  and 
inflammation.  Conclusions  regarding  the  proper  applica- 
tion of  airway  clearance  techniques  can  only  be  ba.sed  on 
studies  that  employ  broad  outcome  measures,  such  as  VAP 
rate,  mortality,  and  resource  utilization. 

REFERENCES 

1.  Lcvine  .SA.  Nicilcrman  MS.  The  impaci  ol  Irachcal  inliihaticm  cm 
host  defenses  and  risks  for  nosocomial  pnciinionia.  Clin  CheM  Med 
1991:I2(3):52.V.543. 

2.  Adair  CG.  Gorman  SP.  Feron  BM.  Bycrs  t,M.  Jones  D.S.  Goldsniilh 


Respir.-xtory  Care  •  Jll'i-  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


815 


Airway  Clearance  Techniques  for  the  Patient  with  an  Artikktai.  Airway 


10 


II 


CE.  et  al.  Implications  ol  cndiHracheal  tube  biofilm  lor  ventilalor- 
associalcd  pneumonia.  Intensive  Care  Med  iyW;2.'i(  l()l:l()72-l()7(i. 

3.  Feldman  C.  Kassel  M.  Canliell  J.  Kaka  S.  Morar  R.  Goolam  Ma- 
homed A,  Philips  Jl.  The  presence  and  sequence  ol  endotracheal  tube 
colonization  in  patients  underyoinj;  mechanical  ventilation  Eur  Re- 
spir  J  I999;13(3):546-55l. 

4.  Hagler  DA.  Traver  GA.  Endotracheal  saline  and  suction  catheters: 
sources  of  lower  airway  contaimnation.  Am  J  Crit  Care  IW4;3(6): 
444-447. 

.^  Gundmundsson  G.  Hornick  DB.  Pathophysioloys  of  hospital  ac- 
quired pneumonia.  Sem  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  iyy7;18l2):99-l  10. 

6.  Meeran  H.  Messenl  M.  Systemic  inllammatory  response  syndrome. 
Trauma  2001;3:89-100. 

7.  Klainer  AS.  Turndrof  H.  Wu  Wll.  Maewal  H.  Allcnder  P.  Surface 
alterations  due  to  endotracheal  intubation.  Am  J  Med  |y75;5S(5|: 
674-6X3. 

8.  Staufler  JL.  Olson  DE,  Petty  TL.  Complications  and  consequences 
of  endotracheal  intubation  and  tracheostomy:  a  prospective  study  of 
150  critically  ill  adult  patients.  Am  J  Med  1981;70(  I  ):65-76. 

9.  Ramphal  R.  Small  PM.  Shands  JW  Jr.  Fischlschweiger  W.  Small  PA 
Jr.  Adherence  of  pseudomonas  aeruginosa  to  tracheal  cells  injured 
by  intluenza  infection  or  by  endotracheal  intubation.  Infect  Imiiuiii 
I980;27(2):(il4-6I9. 

Ramphal  R.  Pyle  M.  .Adherence  of  mucoid  and  non-mucoid  Psciula- 
numas  aeruginosa  to  acid  injured  epithelium.  Infect  Immun  1983; 
4I(I):345-351. 

Inglis  TJ.  Lim  EW.  Lee  GS.  Cheong  KF.  Ng  KS.  Endogenous  source 
of  bacteria  in  tracheal  tube  and  proximal  ventilator  breathing  system 
in  intensive  care  patients.  Br  J  Anaesth  1998;80(  I  ):4I— 15. 

1 2.  Evvig  S.  Torres  A.  El-Ebiary  M.  Fabregas  N,  Hernandez  C.  Gon/.alez 
J.  Nicolas  JM.  Soto  L.  Bacterial  colonization  patterns  in  mechani- 
cally ventilated  patients  with  traumatic  and  medical  head  injury: 
incidence,  risk  factors,  and  association  with  ventilator-associated 
pneumonia.  Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  1 999;  1 59(1):  188- 198. 

13.  Gorman  SP.  McGovern  JG.  Woolfson  AD.  Adair  CG,  Jones  DS.  The 
concomitant  development  of  polytvinyl  chloride )-related  biofilm  and 
antimicrobial  resistance  in  relation  to  ventilator  associated  pneumo- 
nia. Biomaterials  2001:22(201:2741-2747. 

14.  Kinon  OC.  DeHaven  B.  Morgan  J.  Morejon  O.  Civetta  J.  A  pro- 
spective, randomized  comparison  of  an  in-line  heat  moisture  ex- 
change filler  and  heated  wire  humidifiers:  rates  of  ventilator-associ- 
ated early-onset  (community-acquired)  or  late-onset  (hospital- 
acquired)  pneumonia  and  incidence  of  endotracheal  tube  occlusion. 
Chest  1997:112(41:1055-10.59 

15.  Memish  7.A.  Oni  GA.  Dja/mati  W.  Cunningham  G.  Mah  MW.  A 
randomized  clinical  trial  to  compare  the  effects  of  a  heat  and  mois- 
ture exchanger  with  a  heated  humidifying  system  on  the  occurrence 
rate  of  ventilator-associated  pneumonia.  .\m  J  Infect  Control  2001; 
29(51:301-305. 

16.  Kapadia  FN.  Bajan  KB.  Singh  S.  Mathew  B.  Nath  A.  Wadkar  S. 
Changing  patterns  of  airway  accidents  in  intubated  ICU  patients. 
Intensne  Care  Med  20OI;27(  1  ):296-.W0. 

Villalane  MC.  Cinnella  G.  Lolaso  F.  Isabey  D.  Harf  A.  Lemaire  F. 
Brochard  L.  Gradual  reduction  of  endotracheal  tube  diameter  during 
mechanical  ventilation  via  different  humidifictition  devices.  .Anes- 
thesiology 1996:85(6):  1341-1.349. 

Ricard  JD.  Le  Miere  E.  Markowicz  P.  Lasry  S.  Saumon  G.  Djedaini 
K.  et  al.  Efficiency  and  safety  of  mechanical  ventilation  with  a  heat 
and  moisture  exchanger  changed  only  once  a  week.  .Am  .1  Respir  Cnl 
Care  Med  2000; I61l  1 1:104- 109, 

19.  Raymond  SJ.  Normal  saline  instillation  before  suctioning:  helpful  or 
harmfur.'  A  review  of  the  literature.  .Am  J  Crit  Care  I9y5;4(4):267- 
271. 


17 


18 


28. 


29. 


20.  Blackwood  B.  Normal  saline  instillation  with  endotracheal  suction- 
ing: primuni  non  nocere  (first  do  no  harm).  J  Adv  Nurs  1999:29(4): 
928-934. 

21 .  Homer  JJ.  Dowley  AC.  Condon  L.  El-Jassar  P.  Sood  S.  The  effect  of 
hypcrtonicity  on  nasal  mucociliary  clearance.  Clin  Otolar\ngol  2000: 
25(6):558-560. 

22.  Wark  PA.  McDonald  V.  Nebulised  hypertonic  saline  for  cystic  fi- 
brosis. Cochrane  Database  Syst  Rev  2000;(2):CDOOI5()6. 

23.  Strauss  EG.  Holmes  DL.  Nortman  DF.  Friedman  S.  Hypertonic  sa- 
line compresses:  therapy  for  complicated  exit-site  infections.  Adv 
Pent  Dial  1993.9:248-2.50. 

24.  Cook  DJ.  Reeve  BK.  Guyatt  GH.  Heyland  DK.  Gnffith  LE.  Buck- 
ingham L.  Tryba  M.  Stress  ulcer  prophylaxis  in  critically  ill  patients: 
resolving  discordant  meta-analyses.  JAMA  1996;275(4):308-314. 

25.  Drakulovic  MB.  Torres  A.  Bauer  TT,  Nicolas  JM.  .Nogue  S.  Ferrer 
M.  Supine  body  position  as  a  risk  factor  for  nosocomial  pneumonia 
in  mechanically  ventilated  patients:  a  randomized  trial.  Lancet  1999; 
354(9193):I85I-1858. 

26.  Roiiby  JJ.  Laurent  P.  Gosnach  M.  Cambau  E.  Lamas  G.  Zouaoui  A. 
el  al.  Risk  factors  and  clinical  relevance  of  nosocomial  maxillary 
sinusitis  in  the  critically  ill.  .Am  J  Respir  Cnl  Care  Med  1994:150(3): 
776-783. 

27  Holzapfel  L.  Chevret  S.  Madinier  G.  Ohen  F.  Demingeon  G.  Coupry 
A.  Chaudet  M.  Influence  of  long-term  oro-  or  nasotracheal  intuba- 
tion on  nosocomial  maxillary  sinusitis  and  pneumonia:  results  of  a 
prospective  randomized  clinical  trial.  Crit  Care  Med  1993:21(8); 
1132-1138. 

Fourrier  F.  Duvivier  B.  Boutignv  H.  Roussel-Delvallez  M.  Chopin 
C.  Colonization  of  denial  plaque:  a  source  of  nosocomial  inlections 
in  intensive  care  unit  patients.  Crit  Care  Med  I998;26(2|:30I-308. 
Holzapfel  L,  Chastang  C.  Demingeon  G.  Bohe  J.  Piralla  B.  Coupry 
A.  A  randomized  study  assessing  the  systematic  search  for  maxillary 
sinusitis  in  nasolracheally  mechanically  ventilated  patients:  influ- 
ence of  nosocomial  maxillary  sinusitis  on  the  occurrence  of  venti- 
lator-as.sociated  pneumonia.  .Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  1999;  159(3): 
695-701. 

30.  Mahul  P.  Auboyer  C.  Jospe  R.  Ros  A.  Guerin  C.  El  Khouri  E.  et  al. 
Prevention  of  nosocomial  pneumonia  in  intubated  patients:  respec- 
tive role  of  mechanical  subglottic  secretions  drainage  and  stress  ulcer 
prophylaxis.  Intensive  Care  Med  l992;I8(l);20-25. 

31  Hlpern  EH.  Jacobs  ER.  Bone  RC.  Incidence  of  aspiration  in  trache- 
ally  imubaled  adults.  Heart  Lung  1987;I6(5):527-53I. 

32.  Kollef  MH.  Skubas  NJ.  Sundt  TM.  A  randomized  clinical  trial  of 
continuous  aspiration  of  subglottic  secretions  in  cardiac  surgery  pa- 
tients. Chest  I999;1I6(5):1339-I346. 

33.  Rello  J.  Sonora  R.  Jubert  P.  Artigas  A.  Rue  M.  Valles  J.  Pneumonia 
in  intubated  patients:  role  of  respiratory  airv^ay  care.  Am  J  Respir 
Crit  Care  Med  I996;L54(  I  );l  11-1 15. 

34.  Fung  ST.  Poon  YY.  Chong  ZK.  Jawan  B.  Lee  JH.  Removal  of  an 
aspirated  prosthetic  tooth  by  tracheal  backtlow  air.  Anesth  Analg 
20()0;9()l4l:993-994. 

35.  Blunt  MC  Young  PJ.  Patil  .A.  Haddock  .A.  Gel  lubncalion  of  the 
tracheal  tube  cuff  reduces  pulmonary  aspiration.  .Anesthesiology 
2001:95(2)377-381. 

36.  Pavlin  EG.  Van  Niinwegen  D.  Hornbein  TF.  Failure  of  high-com- 
pliance low-pressure  cuff  to  prevent  aspiration.  Anesthesiology  1975; 
42(21:216-219. 

37.  Young  PJ.  Basson  C.  Hamilton  D.  Ridley  S.A.  Prevention  of  tracheal 
aspiration  using  the  pressure-limited  tracheal  tube  culf  .Anaesthesia 
l99y;54(6):.559-563. 

38.  Hailmann  M.  Guttmanii  J.  Muller  B.  llallmann  T.  Geiger  K  Reduc- 
tion of  the  bacterial  load  by  the  silver-coated  endotracheal  tube 
(SCET):  a  laboratory  investigation.  Technol  Health  Care  1999:7(5): 
3.59-370. 


816 


Respiratory  Carl  •  Jll^  20U2  Vol  47  No  7 


Airway  Clearance  Techniques  for  the  Patient  with  an  Ariii  k  i  \i  Airway 


39.  TrawcigLT  R.  Kolobmv  T.  Cerod;i  M.  Giaciimini  M.  L'-.iiki  .1.  Horiba 
K.  FfrraiiN  V J.  Clearance  nt  mucus  linin  endotracheal  lubes  during 
intratracheal  pulnumarN  \ciiiilation.  Anesthesiology  1997;86(6): 
1367-1364. 

40.  Grimniett  WG,  Poh  J.  Clearance  of  an  obstructed  endotracheal  lube 
with  an  arterial  emboleclomy  catheter  with  the  patient  in  the  prone 
position.  Anaesth  Intensive  Care  1998  26(5):579-58l. 

41.  Torres  A.  Gaiell  JM.  A/nar  E.  el-Ebiary  M.  Puig  de  la  Bellacasa  J. 
Gon/ale/  J.  et  al.  Re-intubation  increases  the  risk  of  nosiicomial 
pneunmnia  in  patients  needing  mechanical  \enlilation.  .Am  J  Respir 
Crit  Care  Med  199.S:l.s2l  1 1:137-141. 

42.  Ntounienopoulos  G.  Gild  A.  Cooper  DJ.  The  effects  of  manual  lung 
hyperinflation  and  postural  drainage  on  pulmonary  complications  in 
mechanically  ventilated  trauma  patients.  Anaesth  Intensive  C;ire  1998: 
26(5);492-f96. 

43.  Galvis  AG.  Reyes  G.  Nelson  WB.  Bedside  managemeni  of  lung 
collapse  in  children  on  mechanical  ventilation:  saline  lavage-smui- 
lated  cough  technique  proves  simple,  effective.  Pedialr  Pulmonol 
l994:l7l5):326-33(). 

44.  Denehy  L.  The  use  of  manual  hyperinllation  in  airuay  clearance.  Eur 
Respir  J  1999:l4(4):958-965. 

45.  Johnson  KL.  Kearney  PA.  Johnson  SB.  Niblelt  JB.  MacMillan  NL. 
McClain  RE.  Closed  versus  open  endotracheal  suctioning:  costs  and 
physiologic  consequences.  Crit  Care  Med  1994;22(4):658-666. 

46.  Combes  P.  Fauvage  B.  Oleyer  C.  Nosocomial  pneumonia  in  me- 
chanically ventilated  patients:  a  prospective  randomised  evaluation 
of  the  Stericath  closed  suctioning  system.  Intensive  Care  Med  2U()0 
Jul;26(7l:87S-S82. 

47.  Kollef  MH.  Prentice  D,  Shapiro  SD.  Eraser  VJ.  Silver  P.  Trovillion 
E.  et  al.  Mechanical  ventilation  with  or  without  dailv  changes  of 


?0, 


.SI 


in-line  suction  catheters.  Am  J  Respir  ("ril  Care  Med  1997:15612  Pi 
I  ):466-472. 

48.  Scoble  MK.  Copnell  B,  Taylor  A.  Kinney  S.  Shann  1-.  Effect  of 
reusing  suction  catheters  on  the  occurrence  of  pneumonia  in  chil- 
dren. Heart  Lung  2001:30(3)225-233. 

49.  Wilson  G.  Hughes  G.  Rennie  J.  Moreley  C.  Evaluation  of  two  en- 
dotracheal suction  regimes  in  babies  ventilated  for  respiratory  dis- 
tress syndrome.  Early  Hum  Dev  1991;25l2):87-90. 
Cordero  L,  Sananes  M.  Ayers  LW.  A  comparison  of  two  airway 
suctioning  freqtiencies  in  mechanically  ventilated,  very-low -birth- 
weight  inlanls.  Respir  Care  2(101,46(8)78,3-788. 
Nagaraj  HS,  Shott  R,  Fellows  R.  Yacoub  V.  Recurrent  lobar  atelec- 
tasis due  to  acquired  bronchial  stenosis  in  neonates.  J  Pediatr  Surg 
I980:I5(4):4II^I5. 

52.  Bailey  C,  Kattwinkel  J.  Teja  K.  Buckley  I  Shallow  versus  deep 
endotracheal  suctioning  in  young  rabbits:  pathologic  effects  on  the 
tracheobronchial  wall.  Pediatrics  I988;82(5):746-75I. 

53.  Kapur  S.  Yizhak  K,  Sipola  M,  Zennia  C.  Tessler  S,  Causes  of  suction 
trauma  in  patients  requiring  pulmonary  toilet  {abstract).  Chest  2001; 
120(4  Pt  2):275S, 

54.  Singh  NC.  Kissoon  N.  Frewen  T.  Tiffin  N.  Physiological  responses 
to  endotracheal  and  oral  suctioning  in  paediatric  patients:  the  inllu- 
ence  of  endotracheal  tube  sizes  and  suction  pressures.  Clin  Intensive 
Care  I99Il2(6):345-350. 

55.  Liebler  JM.  Markin  CJ.  Fiberoptic  bronchoscopy  for  diagnosis  and 
treatment.  Crit  Care  Clin  2000:16(1  ):83- 1 00. 

56.  Raoof  S,  Chowdhrey  N,  Raoof  S.  Feurman  M,  King  A.  Sriraman  R, 
Khan  FA.  Effect  of  combined  kinetic  therapy  and  percussion  therapy 
on  the  resolution  of  atelectasis  in  critically  ill  patients.  Chest  1999: 
115(61:1658-1666. 


Respir.atory  Care  •  Ji  ly  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


817 


The  Pharmacologic  Approach  to  Airway  Clearance: 


Mucoactive  Agents 


Bruce  K  Rubin  MEngr  MD  FAARC 


Introduction 
Kxpectorants 
Medications  That  Change  the  Biophysical  Properties  of  Secretions 

Mucolytics 
Mucokinetic  Agents 
Cough  Clearance  Promoters 
Mucoregulatory  Medications 
Summary 


The  airway  mucosa  responds  to  infection  and  inflammation  in  a  variety  of  ways.  This  response  often 
includes  surface  mucous  (goblet)  cell  and  submucosal  gland  hyperplasia  and  hypertrophy,  with 
mucus  hypersecretion.  Products  of  inflammation,  including  ncutrophil-derived  deoxyribonucleic 
acid  (DNA)  and  filamentous  actin  (F-actin),  effete  cells,  bacteria,  and  cell  debris,  all  contribute  to 
mucus  purulence  and.  when  this  mucus  is  expectorated  it  is  called  sputum.  Mucoactive  medications 
are  intended  to  serve  one  of  2  purposes;  either  to  increase  the  ability  to  expectorate  sputum  or  to 
decrease  mucus  hypersecretion.  Mucoactive  medications  have  been  classified  according  to  their 
proposed  mechanisms  of  action.  Increased  knowledge  of  the  properties  of  mucus  has  given  us  tools 
to  better  understand  the  mechanisms  of  airway  disease  and  mucoactive  therapy.  Expectorants  are 
thought  to  increase  the  volume  or  hydration  of  airway  secretions.  Systemic  hydration  and  classic 
expectorants  have  not  been  demonstrated  to  be  clinically  effective.  Modifiers  of  airway  water  trans- 
port are  being  clinically  investigated  as  expectorants.  Mucolytics  degrade  polymers  in  secretions. 
The  classic  mucolytics  have  free  thiol  groups  to  degrade  mucin.  Peptide  mucolytics  break  pathologic 
filaments  of  neutrophil-derived  DNA  and  actin  in  sputum.  Nondestructive  mucolysis  includes  mucin 
dispersion  by  means  of  charge  shielding.  Mucokinetics  are  medications  that  increase  mucociliary 
efficiency  or  cough  efficiency.  Cough  flow  can  be  increased  by  bronchodilators  in  patients  with 
airway  hyperreactivity.  Ahhesives  such  as  surfactants  decrease  mucus  attachment  to  the  cilia  and 
epithelium,  augmenting  both  cough  and  mucociliary  clearance.  Mucoregulatory  agents  reduce  the 
volume  of  airway  mucus  secretion  and  appear  to  be  especially  effective  in  hypersecretory  states  such 
as  bronchorrhea,  diffuse  panbronchiolitis,  and  some  forms  of  asthma.  Mucoregulatory  agents 
include  anti-injlammatory  agents  (indomethacin.  glucocorticosteroids),  anticholinergic  agents,  and 
some  macrolide  antibiotics.  Classifying  mucoactive  agents  should  help  us  to  develop  and  evaluate 
new  types  of  therapy  and  to  better  direct  therap>  tow  ard  the  patients  who  are  most  likely  to  benefit. 
Kc\  words:  muvocuiivc  nicdiidlioiis.  cxpectdidiits.  iniicolrliis.  niucdkiiiaiis.  muc<irci;iilcitiir\  niciliici- 
lions.  nuicroUdes,  surfactants,  ahhesives.  ion  transport.  coiti;h.  mncociUury  clearance,  cystic  fibrosis, 
chronic  Ivoncliitis.     (Respir  Care  2()02;47(7):81<S-S22] 


818  Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Thk  Pharmacoi ouic  Approach  to  A\lR\vA^  Ci.iarance:  MucoArrivF,  Agents 


Introduction 

The  air\\ii>  iinicosa  ivspniKls  to  intcdioii  and  inriam- 
ination  in  a  variety  ot  ways.  Tiiis  response  often  iiieliRles 
surface  mucous  (goblet)  cell  and  submucosal  gland  hyper- 
plasia and  hypertrophy,  with  mucus  hypersecretion.  Prod- 
ucts of  inflammation  (including  neulrophil-derived  de- 
oxyribonucleic acid  |DNA|  and  filamentous  actin  |F-actin|. 
effete  cells,  bacteria,  and  cell  debris)  all  contribute  to  mu- 
cus purulcncc,  and  when  this  mucus  is  expectorated  it  is 
called  sputum.  Mucoactive  medications  are  intended  to 
serve  one  of  2  purposes;  either  to  increase  the  ability  to 
expectorate  sputum  or  to  decrease  mucus  hypersecretion. 
Mucoactive  medications  have  been  classified  according  to 
their  proposed  mechanisms  of  action  (Table  1).'  In  this 
review  I  discuss  each  of  these  classes  of  medication,  their 
proposed  mechanisms  of  action,  and  their  potential  uses  in 
treating  chronic  airways  diseases  associated  with  poor  mu- 
cus clearance  and  mucus  hypersecretion. 

Expectorants 

Expectorants  are  medications  taken  to  improve  the  abil- 
ity to  expectorate  purulent  secretions.  The  term  expecto- 
rants is  now  taken  to  mean  medications  that  increase  air- 
way water  or  the  volume  of  airway  secretions.  The  most 
commonly  used  expectorants  are  simple  hydration  (includ- 
ing both  hland  aerosol  administration  and  oral  hydration), 
iodide-containing  compounds  such  as  SSKI  (saturated  so- 
lution of  potassium  iodine)  or  iodinated  glycerol,  glyceryl 
guaiacolate  (guaifenesin),  and  the  more  recently  devel- 
oped ion  channel  modifiers  such  as  the  P2Y2  purinergic 
agonists.  Most  of  these  are  ineffective  at  adding  water 
to  the  airway,  and  those  that  are  effective  are  also  mu- 
cus secretagogues.  increasing  the  volume  of  both  mucus 
and  water  in  the  airways.  Despite  widespread  use,  io- 
dinated compounds,  guaifenesin,  and  simple  hydration 
are  ineffective  as  expectorants.-  In  fact  over-hydration 
has  been  shown  to  decrease  airway  mucus  clearance  in 
some  patients  with  chronic  airway  disease,  particularly 
those  with  acute  asthma.' 

Hyperosmolar  saline  aerosol  or  dry-powder  mannitol 
inhalation  has  been  used  for  sputum  induction,  and  there 


Table  I.      Mucoactive  Agents 


Mucoactive  Agent 


Possible  Mechanism  of  Action 


Bruce  K  Rubin  MEngr  MD  F.AARC  is  affiliated  with  tlic  Department  of 
Pediatrics.  Wal<c  Forest  University  School  ot  Medicine.  Winston-Salem, 
North  Carolina. 

Dr  Rubin  presented  a  version  of  this  report  at  the  17th  Annual  New 
Horizons  Symposium  at  the  47th  International  Respiratory  Congress.  San 
Antonio.  Texas,  December  14.  2001. 

Correspondence:  Bruce  K  Rubin  MEiigr  MD  FAARC.  Department  of 
Pediatrics.  Wake  Forest  Universitv  School  of  Medicine.  Medical  Center 
Boulevard.  Winston-Salem  NC  27l.'i7-l08l.  E-mail:  bnjbintS'wtubmc.edu. 


Hypertonic  saline 

Chiwiciil  nimolytics 
N-acctylcysteine 

Nacystelyn 

Fi'lHiile  mmolyuci 
Dornase  alfa 

Gelsolin  or  Thymosin  fi4 

Non-desniuiivc  inuLolytics 
Dextran 

Low  molecular  weight 
heparin 

Mucore^tilaloiy  agenls 
Anticholinergic  agents 

Glucocorticoids 

Indomethacin 
Macrolide  antibiotics 

Cininh  clciiraiuc  promoters 
Bronchodilators 

Surfactants 


Increases  secretion  \olume  and 
perhaps  hydration 

Severs  disullide  bond  linking 

mucin  oligomers 
Increases  chloride  secretion  and 

severs  liisuHide  bonds 

Hydroly/es  DNA  polymer  with 

reduction  in  DNA  length 
Depolymeri/.es  F-actin 


Breaks  hydrogen  bonds  and 
increases  secretion  hydration 

May  break  both  hydrogen  and  ionic 
bonds 


Decrea.ses  volume  of  stimulated 

secretions 
Decreases  airway  innammalion  and 

mucin  secretion 
Decreases  airway  inflammation 
Decreases  airway  inflammation  and 

mucin  secretion 

Can  improve  cough  clearance  by 

increasing  expiratory  flow 
Decreases  sputum  adhesivity 


DN.^  -  deoxyribonucleic  .icid 


are  some  data  that  suggest  that  the.se  may  also  promote 
airway  mucus  clearance  in  patients  with  chronic  airway 
disease.-'-'^ 

Agents  that  increase  transport  across  ion  channels,  such 
as  the  cystic  fibrosis  transmembrane  ion  regulator  (CFTR) 
chloride  channel,  calcium-dependent  chloride  channel,  or 
agents  that  increase  water  transport  across  the  airway  aqua- 
porin  water  channels  may  increase  the  hydration  of  the 
periciliary  fluid  and  st)  may  aid  expectoration.  These  med- 
ications (including  gene  transfer  vectors)  are  actively  be- 
ing investigated.  Early  results  from  studies  using  uri- 
dine triphosphate  (UTP)  to  stimulate  chloride  secretion 
or  amiloride  to  block  epithelial  sodium  channels  were 
disappointing  in  that  these  agents  did  not  produce  sus- 
tained improveinent  in  pulmonary  function  in  persons 
with  cystic  fibrosis  (CF).'' 

In  general,  expectorant  medications  have  not  been  con- 
sistently demonstrated  to  be  effective  for  the  treatment  of 
any  acute  or  chronic  airway  disease  associated  with  mucus 
stasis  or  hypersecretion. 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


819 


The  Pharmacologic  Approach  to  Airway  Ciharance:  Mucoactive  Agents 


Medications  That  Chaiifit'  the  biophysical  Properties 
of  Secretions 

The  principal  polymer  component  of  normal  airway  mu- 
cus is  mucin  glycoprotein.  The  mucin  protein  is  heavily 
decorated  with  oligosaccharide  side  chains,  and  the  elon- 
gated glycoproteins  linearly  polymerize  and  form  a  "tan- 
gled network"  secondary  structure.  This  accounts  for  the 
gel  structure  of  normal  airway  mucus.  With  chronic  in- 
tlammation  there  is  thought  to  be  hypersecretion  of  mucin, 
although  this  has  not  been  proven.^  In  addition,  a  second- 
ary polymer  network  composed  of  neutrophil-deri  ved  DN  A 
and  F-actin  also  forms  within  the  airway.  This  DNA  forms 
rigid  polymer  chains  that  copolymerize  with  cell-wall-as- 
sociated actin.**  This  secondary  polymer  network  is  prob- 
ably responsible  for  many  of  the  abnormal  properties  of 
purulent  secretions. 

Mucolytics 

Mucolytic  medications  depolymerize  either  the  mucin 
network  (classic  mucolytics)  or  the  DNA-actin  polymer 
network  (peptide  mucolytics)  and  in  so  doing  reduce  the 
viscosity  and  elasticity  of  airway  secretions.  Mucus  has 
viscoelastic  properties  of  both  liquids  (viscosity)  and  sol- 
ids (elasticity).  Thus  it  is  a  gel,  and  both  the  viscous  (en- 
ergy loss)  and  elastic  (energy  storage)  properties  are  es- 
sential for  mucus  spreading  and  clearance."  Mucociliary 
clearance  appears  to  be  dependent  upon  there  being  an 
optimal  ratio  of  viscosity  to  elasticity.  Mucolytic  agents 
have  the  potential  to  improve  mucus  rheology,  thus  im- 
proving mucociliary  or  cough  clearance,  but  these  medi- 
cations are  also  potentially  able  to  over-liquify  secretions 
and  thus  decrease  clearance.'" 

Classic  Mucolytics.  Classic  mucolytics  depolymerize 
the  mucin  glycoprotein  oligomers  by  hydrolyzing  the  di- 
sulfide bonds  that  link  the  mucin  monomers.  This  is  usu- 
ally accomplished  by  free  thiol  (sullhydryl)  groups  hydro- 
lyzing disulfide  bonds  attached  to  cysteine  residues  of  the 
protein  core.  The  best  known  of  these  agents  is  N-acetyl 
L-cysteine  (NAC),  which  is  widely  used  to  treat  chronic 
bronchitis  in  Europe  and  Asia.  There  are  few  data  avail- 
able from  placebo-controlled  clinical  trials  of  NAC  or  its 
derivatives,  and  the  available  data  do  not  clearly  demon- 
strate that  NAC  improves  mucus  clearance  or  pulmonary 
function."  NAC  aerosol  is  available  in  the  United  States 
but  is  often  poorly  tolerated  by  patients  because  of  its 
sulfurous  odor  and  because  its  low  pH  (2.2)  is  associated 
with  bronchospasm.  NAC  is  an  antioxidant  and  has  been 
used  to  treat  acetaminophen  overdose.  The  oral  compound 
is  also  available  in  Europe,  but.  despite  being  a  potent 
anti-oxidant.  few  data  indicate  that  this  medication  is  ef- 
fective in  the  treatment  of  chronic  airway  di.sease. 


Fig.  1 .  Laser  scanning  confocal  microscope  image  of  cystic  fibro- 
sis sputum  abundant  in  long  filaments  of  deoxyribonucleic  acid 
(DNA)  stained  witfi  Yoyo-1.  Initially  prominent  DNA  polymer  fila- 
ments (left)  are  degraded  by  dornase  alfa  treatment  in  vitro  (right). 
(From  Reference  7.  with  permission.) 


There  are  a  number  of  similar  compounds  containing 
sulfhydryl  groups  that  effectively  depolymerize  mucin 
polymers  in  vitro.  Although  many  of  these  are  better  tol- 
erated than  NAC.  none  have  been  clearly  demonstrated  to 
improve  mucus  clearance. 

Peptide  Mucolytics.  The  mucin  polyiner  network  is  es- 
sential for  normal  mucus  clearance.  It  may  be  that  the 
classic  mucolytics  are  generally  ineffective  because  they 
are  depolymerizing  essential  components  of  the  mucous 
gel.  With  airway  intlammation  and  intlammatory  cell  ne- 
crosis, a  secondary  polymer  network  develops  in  purulent 
secretions.  In  contrast  to  the  mucin  network,  this  patho- 
logic polymer  gel  serves  no  obvious  purpose  in  airway 
protection  or  mucus  clearance.  The  peptide  mucolytics  are 
designed  specifically  to  depolymerize  the  DNA  polymer 
(dornase  alfa)  or  the  F-actin  network  (eg.  gelsolin.  thymo- 
.sin  i34)  (Fig.  1). 

Dornase  alfa  has  seen  wide  acceptance  as  a  peptide 
mucolytic  tor  the  treatment  of  CF  airway  disease.'-  When 
used  as  prescribed  its  use  is  associated  with  improved 
pulmonary  function,  decreased  antibiotic  use.  and  de- 
creased hospitalization  rate  for  many  patients  with  CF.'"* 
For  reasons  that  are  not  clear,  this  medication  is  not  luii- 
formly  effective  for  the  treatment  of  CF  airway  disease, 
and  efficacy  does  not  seein  to  be  related  to  sputum  DNA 
content  in  persons  with  CF.  There  are  limited  and  anec- 
dotal data  suggesting  that  dornase  alfa  may  be  effective  in 
treating  .some  persons  with  non-CF  bronchiectasis,  includ- 
ing some  patients  with  priinary  ciliary  dyskinesia. '■^  Al- 
though dornase  alfa  was  not  effective  for  the  therapy  of 
severe  chronic  bronchitis,  there  are  no  published  studies 
evaluating  its  potential  efficacy  in  patients  with  milder 
disease. 

Both  gelsolin  and  thymosin  fi4  have  been  demonstrated 
to  depolymerize  the  pathologic  DNA/F-actin  network  in 


820 


Re.spirator'c  Care  •  ]vl\  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


The  Pharmacologic  Approach  to  Airway  Ci.farancf,:  Mucoactivi-  Agents 


CF  sputum,  but  these  agents  have  not  been  studied  in 
controlled  chnieai  trials. 

Nondestructive  Mucolytics.  Muein  is  a  polyionie  tan- 
gled net\M>rk.  and  the  charged  naline  of  the  oligosaecha- 
ride  side  chains  helps  to  hold  this  network  tiigether  as  a 
gel.  Several  agents  ha\e  been  proposed  that  can  "loosen" 
this  network  by  charge  shielding.  These  agents  include 
low -molecular-weight  dextran,  heparin,  and  other  sugars 
or  glycoproteins.'-'^ 

Mucokinetic  Agents 

A  mucokinetic  medication  is  a  drug  that  increases  mu- 
cociliary clearance,  generally  by  acting  on  the  cilia.  Al- 
though a  variety  of  medications,  such  as  tricyclic  nucleo- 
tides. (5  agonist  bronchodilators.  and  methylxanthine 
bronchodilators.  have  been  demonstrated  to  increase  cili- 
ary beat  frequency,  these  agents  have  only  a  minimal  ef- 
fect on  mucociliary  clearance  in  patients  with  lung  dis- 
ease.'* The  reason  for  this  is  probably  a  combination  of 
factors,  including  the  limited  potential  for  efficacy  in  an 
airway  with  dysfunctional  cilia  or  denuded  of  cilia.  Most 
of  these  agents  are  also  mucus  secretagogues,  which  may, 
paradoxically,  increase  the  burden  of  airway  secretions. 
Bronchodilator  medications  can  also  increa.se  airway  col- 
lapse in  patients  with  bronchomalacia  by  virtue  of  their 
ability  to  relax  airway  smooth  muscle.  Therefore,  the  only 
persons  for  whom  these  medications  are  recommended  are 
those  who  have  improved  expiratory  air  tlow  following 
their  use.  Increased  expiratory  air  flow  can  substantially 
contribute  to  the  effectiveness  of  cough. '^  Thus,  broncho- 
dilators might  be  better  considered  cough  clearance  pro- 
motors,  as  described  below. 

Cough  Clearance  Promoters 

Cough  becomes  a  major  mechanism  for  mucus  clear- 
ance when  there  is  extensive  ciliary  damage  and  mucus 
hypersecretion.  Cough  clearance  depends  on  expiratory  air 
flow,  volume,  and  force,  and  the  biophysical  properties  of 
airway  secretions.  In  general,  decreasing  the  viscoelastic- 
ity  of  airway  secretions  will  not  improve  cough  clearance 
unless  this  therapy  also  releases  mucus  from  adherent  en- 
tanglements w  ith  cilia.  As  mucus  becomes  adherent  to  the 
epithelium,  it  becomes  far  more  difficult  to  expectorate. 
Patients  who  appear  to  benefit  from  expectorants  or  mu- 
colytic agents  may  do  so  by  virtue  of  these  medications 
releasing  mucus  from  epithelial  attachment. 

Agents  that  reduce  the  adhesivity  of  airway  secretions 
and  thus  reduce  binding  to  the  epithelium  are  the  abhe- 
sives.  There  is  a  thin  layer  of  surfactant  that  separates  the 
periciliary  fluid  and  the  cilia  from  the  mucus  layer,  per- 
mitting effective  ciliary  function  and  preventing  secretion 


adherence  to  the  epithelium.  With  airway  inllammalion 
there  is  extensive  surfactant  hydrolysis  by  secretory  phos- 
pholipases  A2  (sPLA2)  and  the  generation  of  lyso-phos- 
pholipids  ihal  appear  to  increase  mucus  adhesivity."*  It  has 
been  shown  thai  aerosolized  surfactants  are  effective  ab- 
hesives  and  can  significantly  improve  both  cough  clear- 
ability  of  secretions  anil  pulmonary  function  in  |iatienls 
with  chronic  bronchitis.''' 

Earlier  generations  of  air-entrainment-driven  Jet  nebu- 
lizers made  it  difficult  to  efficiently  aerosolize  surfactant. 
as  this  medication  foams  extensively  and  coals  surfaces. 
Newer  aerosol  delivery  devices  permit  surfactant  to  be 
administered  efficiently  either  as  a  dry  powder  or  as  a  wet 
aerosol.  .Studies  are  planned  to  evaluate  surfactant  for  pa- 
tients with  chronic  airway  diseases,  using  these  newer 
modes  of  surfactant  delivery. 

Mucoregulatory  Medications 

Another  approach  to  reducing  the  burden  of  airway  se- 
cretions is  to  decrease  hypersecretion  by  goblet  cells  and 
submucosal  glands.  Medications  that  decrease  inucus  hy- 
persecretion, but  not  below  the  baseline  .secretion  rate,  are 
referred  to  as  mucoregulatory  medications.  These  include 
anti-intlammatory  drugs  such  as  corticosteroids,  which  are 
effective  at  decreasing  the  inflammatory  stimulus  that  leads 
to  mucus  hypersecretion.  Aerosolized  indomethacin  has 
also  been  used  in  Japan  to  treat  patients  with  diffuse  pan- 
bronchiolitis.  who  have  impairment  due  to  mucus  hyper- 
secretion.-" 

Anticholinergic  medications  are  also  extensively  used 
as  mucoregulatory  medications.  Atropine  is  routinely  given 
peri-operatively  to  prevent  laryngospasm  and  to  decrea.se 
mucus  secretion  associated  with  endotracheal  intubation. 
Atropine  and  its  derivatives  are  mucoregulatory  medica- 
tions in  that  they  do  not  "dry"  secretions  but  will  decrease 
hypersecretion  that  is  mediated  through  M3  cholinergic 
mechanisms.  The  quaternary  ammonium  derivatives  of  at- 
ropine, including  ipratropiinii  bromide  and  oxitropium  bro- 
mide, do  not  substantially  cross  the  blood-airway  barrier 
and  so  their  use  is  not  associated  with  typical  systemic 
effects  of  anticholinergic  medications  such  as  flushing  and 
tachycardia.  Ipratropium  bromide  is  widely  used  as  a  bron- 
chodilator medication  in  patients  with  chronic  bronchitis. 
Studies  have  also  shown  that  the  long-term  use  of  ipratro- 
pium is  associated  with  a  reduction  in  the  volume  of  mu- 
cus secretion  in  patients  with  chronic  bronchitis.-'  More 
specific  M3  antagonists  hold  the  promise  of  improved  mu- 
coregulatoiy  efficacy  from  this  class  of  medications,  with 
less  risk  of  ad\erse  effects. 

Some  of  the  more  interesting  of  the  mucoregulatory 
medications  are  the  macrolide  antibiotics.  These  antibiot- 
ics were  discovered  50  years  ago.  and  derivatives  of  eryth- 
romvcin  A  have  been  widelv  used  to  treat  bacterial  infec- 


Respirator">-  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


821 


The  Pharmacologic  Approach  io  Airway  Clearance:  Mucoactive  Agents 


tidti.  Since  the  mid-1960s,  diila  ha\e  been  accumulating 
that  these  medications  also  ha\e  iminunoniodulatory  prop- 
erties. This  means  that  they  decrease  hyperimmunity  or 
inllammation  to  more  normal  ami  beneficial  levels.  The 
mechanism  of  these  properties  appears  to  be  ditt'erent  from 
that  of  the  corticosteroids.  These  immunomodulatory  and 
mucoregulatory  properties  of  macrolide  antibiotics  have 
been  exploited  for  the  treatment  ot  diffuse  panbronchiol- 
itis.  a  chronic  inflammatory  airway  disease  with  great  mor- 
bidity and  nuirtality  when  untreated.  Diffuse  panbronchi- 
olitis  is  primarily  seen  in  Japan  and  Korea,  hs  etiolog)  is 
unknovv  n.  but  the  disease  results  in  chronic  sinobronchitis 
with  mucus  hypersecretion  and  debilitation.  Antibiotics 
and  corticosteroids  are  ineffective  for  the  treatment  of  dif- 
fuse panbronchiolitis.  By  virtue  of  their  immunomodula- 
tory and  mucoregulatory  properties,  the  macrolide  antibi- 
otics are  the  most  effective  agents  for  the  treatment  of 
diffuse  panbronchiolitis.  Accumulating  evidence  suggests 
that  the  14-  and  l.'^-member  inacrolides.  but  not  the  16- 
meniber  inacrolides.  may  also  be  highly  effective  for  the 
treatment  of  CF  airway  disease. 

The  mucoregulatory  mechanism  of  the  macrolides  is 
under  intensive  study.---'  and  it  is  anticipated  that  the 
development  of  macrolide  medications  without  antibiotic 
properties  will  substantially  extend  the  spectrum  of  use  of 
these  medications. 

Summary 

Airway  mucus  hypersecretion  and  mucus  retention  is  a 
substantial  problem  for  the  patient  with  chronic  airway 
disease.  The  burden  of  asthma,  chronic  bronchitis,  bron- 
chiectasis, CF,  and  other  airway  diseases  poses  one  of  the 
most  important  public  health  problems  internationally. 
Medications  that  can  effectively  improve  mucus  clearance 
would  provide  relief  to  millions  of  people  around  the  world. 
Although  many  medications  have  been  used  clinically  as 
mucoactive  therapy,  there  are  few  data  to  support  any  but 
a  handful  of  these  medications.  This  is  a  subject  of  ongo- 
ing investigation  and  rapid  change. 

REFERENCES 

1.  Rubin  BK.  Tomkiewicz  RP.  King  M.  Mucoactive  agents:  old  and 
new.  In:  Wilmolt  RW.  editor.  The  pediatric  lung.  Basel:  Birkhauser 
Publishing:  I997:15.'i-I79. 

2.  Jager  EG.  Double-blind,  placebo-controlled  clinical  evaluation  of 
guaimesal  in  oulpalicnls.  Clin  Tliera  198^:1  l(.^):.WI-.%2. 

?.  Shim  C.  King  M.  Williams  MH  Jr.  Lack  of  effect  of  hydration  on 
sputum  production  in  chronic  bronchitis.  Chest  mS7:92(4):679-<S82. 

4.  Eng  PA.  Morion  J.  Douglass  JA.  Riedler  J.  Wilson  J.  Robenson  CF. 
-Short-term  efficacy  of  ultrasonically  nebulized  hypertonic  saline  in 
cystic  fibrosis.  Pediatr  Pulmon  1996:2 1 (2):77-8.1. 

5.  Daviskas  E.  Anderson  SD.  Brannan  JD,  Chan  HK,  Eberl  S,  Bautov- 
ich  G.  Inhalation  of  dry-powder  mannilol  increases  mucociliary  clear- 
ance. Eur  Rcspir  .1  I997;l(l(  1 1  ):2449-24.'i4. 


b.  Graham  A.  Hashani  A.  Alton  EW.  Martin  GP.  Marriott  C.  Hodson 
ME.  Clarke  SW.  Geddes  DM.  No  added  benefit  from  nebulized 
amilohde  in  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis.  Eur  Rcspir  J  199.^:6(9); 
124.V1248. 

7.  Tomkiewicz  RP.  Kishioka  C.  Freeman  J.  Rubin  BK.  DNA  and  aclin 
filament  ullrastructure  in  cystic  fibrosis  sputum.  In:  Bauni  G.  editor. 
Cilia,  mucus  and  mucociliary  interactions.  New  York:  Marcel  Dek- 
ker:  199S:3.W-UI. 

8.  King  M.  Rubin  BK.  Mucus  rheology:  relationship  with  transport.  In: 
Takishima  T.  Airway  secretion:  physiological  bases  for  the  control 
of  mucus  hypersecretion.  New  York:  Marcel  Dekker;  1994:283-314. 

9.  Puchelle  E.  Zahm  JM.  Girard  F.  Bertrand  A.  Polu  JM.  Aug  F.  Sadoul 
P.  Mucociliary  transport  in  vivo  and  in  vilro:  relations  to  sputum 
properties  in  chronic  bronchitis.  Eur  J  Respir  Dis  19S():bl(5):254- 
264, 

10.  Rubin  BK.  MacLeod  PM.  Sturgess  J.  King  M.  Recurrent  respiratory 
infections  in  a  child  with  fucosidosis.  Is  the  mucus  too  thin  for 
effective  transport'  Pediatr  Pulmonol  199l;10(4):304-.3()9. 

I  I.  Giandjean  EM.  Berthet  P.  Ruffmann  R.  Leuenberger  P.  Efficacy  of 
oral  long-term  N-acetylc\steine  in  chronic  bronchopulmonary  dis- 
ease: a  meta-analysis  of  published  double-blind,  placebo-controlled 
clinical  trials.  Clin  Ther  2000:22(2):209-221. 

12.  Laube  BL.  Auci  RM.  Shields  DE.  Christiansen  DH.  Lucas  MK. 
Fuchs  HJ.  Rosenstein  DH.  Effect  of  rhDNase  on  airflow  obstruction 
and  mucociliary  clearance  in  cystic  fibrosis.  Am  J  Respir  Crit  Care 
Med  l996;l53(2):752-760. 

13.  Fuchs  HJ.  Borowilz  DS.  Christiansen  DH.  Morris  EM.  Nash  ML. 
Ramsey  BW.  Rosenstein  BJ.  Smith  AL.  Wohl  ME.  Effect  of  aero- 
solized recombinant  human  DNase  on  exacerbations  of  respiratory- 
symptoms  and  on  pulmonary  function  in  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis. 
The  Pulmozyme  Study  Group.  N  Engl  J  Med  1994:33 1 ( I0):6.37- 
642. 

14.  Rubin  BK.  Who  will  benefit  from  DNase'.'  Pediatric  Pulmonol  1999; 
27(l):3-t. 

15.  Feng  W,  Garrett  H.  Speen  DP.  King  M.  Improved  clearability  of 
cystic  fibrosis  sputum  with  de.\tran  treatment  in  \itro.  Am  J  Respir 
Crit  Care  Med  I998;l.s7(3  Pt  11:710-714. 

16.  Isawa  T.  Teshima  T.  Hirano  T.  Ebina  A.  Konno  K.  Effect  of  oral 
salbutamol  on  mucociliary  clearance  mechanisms  in  the  lungs.  To- 
hoku  J  Exp  Med  I986;l.'i0(  I  ):.sl-61. 

17.  King  M,  Brock  G.  Lundell  C.  Clearance  of  mucus  by  simulated 
cough.  J  AppI  Physiol  I98.'i:.'i8(6):l776-I782. 

18.  Hite  RD.  Seeds  MC.  Jacinto  RB.  Balasubramanian  R.  Waite  M.  Bass 
D.  Hydrolysis  of  surfactant-associated  phosphotid)  Icholine  by  mam- 
malian secretory  phospholipases  .\2.  .Am  J  Physiol  1998:275  (4  Pt 
I  ):L74()^L747. 

19.  Anzueto  A.  Jubran  A.  Ohar  JA.  Piquette  C.A.  Rennard  SI.  Colice  G. 
at  al.  Effects  of  aerosolized  surfactant  in  patients  with  stable  chronic 
bronchitis.  .A  prospective  randomized  controlled  trial.  JAMA  1997: 
278tl7):1426-l43l. 

20.  Tamaoki  J.  Chiyotani  A.  Kobayashi  K.  Sakai  N.  Kanemura  T. 
Takizawa  T.  Effect  of  indomethacin  on  bronchorrhea  in  patients  w  ith 
chronic  bronchitis,  diffuse  panbronchiolitis.  or  bronchiectasis.  Am 
Rev  Respir  Dis  1992:145(3):548-552. 

2 1 .  Tamaoki  J.  Chiyotani  A.  Tag.iya  E.  Sakai  N.  Konno  K.  Ellcct  of  long 
term  treatment  with  oxitropium  bromide  on  air«  ay  secretion  in  chronic 
bronchitis  and  diffuse  panbronchiolitis.  Thorax  l994;49(6»:545-.548. 

22.  Jaffe  A,  Bush  A.  Anti-infiammatory  effects  of  macrolides  in  lung 
disease.  Pediatr  Pulmonology  2001:31(6):464-473. 

23.  ^ulic  O.  Erakovic  V,  Parnham  MJ.  Anti-inflammatory  effects  of 
macrolide  antibiotics.  Fur  J  Pharmacol  2001:4291 1-3):209-229. 


822 


Respirator')  Care  •  Jli.y  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Airway  Clearance  Strategies  for  the  Pediatric  Patient 

Kathryn  L  Davidson  RRT 


Introduction 

Adherence 

Chest  Physiotherapy 

Breathing  (lames 

Diaphragmatic  Breathing  and  Huffing 

Active  Cycle  of  Breathing  Technique 

Positive  Expiratory  Pressure  Therapy 

High-Frequency  Chest  Wall  Oscillation 

Oscillating  Positive  Expiratory  Pressure 

Autogenic  Drainage 

Summarv 


Clinicians  who  care  for  cystic  fibrosis  (CF)  patients  have  many  techniques  to  choose  from  to 
facilitate  mucus  clearance.  Little  has  been  published  about  when  to  introduce  the  various  tech- 
niques and  in  what  order  to  teach  them.  Debates  have  occurred  over  these  issues  in  the  CF 
community,  and  there  is  now  consensus  on  some  topics.  It  is  very  important  to  teach  adherence  to 
therapy  at  an  early  age.  Adherence  to  an  airway  clearing  regimen  assists  in  maintaining  good 
pulmonary  function  in  CF  patients.  Knowing  when  and  how  to  introduce  airway  clearance  tech- 
niques beyond  chest  physiotherapy  (CPT)  is  clinically  relevant  and  useful.  A  5-position  modified 
CPT  routine  can  be  used  with  infants  and  children,  and  it  takes  less  time  and  may  improve 
adherence.  Infants  and  toddlers  can  be  taught  breathing  games  that  eventually  lead  them  to  per- 
form diaphragmatic  breathing  and  huffing.  Once  they  have  mastered  diaphragmatic  breathing  and 
huffing,  children  can  be  taught  the  active  cycle  of  breathing  technique.  Modified  CPT  can  be 
phased  out  at  that  point.  Positive  expiratory  pressure  therapy  can  usually  be  introduced  around 
6-7  years  of  age.  High-frequency  chest  wall  oscillation,  oscillating  positive  expiratory  pressure, 
and  autogenic  drainage  all  follow.  CF  patients  should  be  given  every  opportunity  to  learn  and 
master  various  techniques  to  promote  mucus  clearance.  Key  words:  cystic  fibrosis,  CF,  airway 
clearance,  adherence,  chest  physiotherapy,  breathing  games,  diaphragmatic  breathing,  huffing,  ac- 
tive cxcle  of  breathing  technique,  positive  expiratory  pressure  therapy,  autogenic  drainage,  pediat- 
ric.    [Respir  Care  2002:47(7):823-828] 

Introduction  last  10  years  in  the  United  States.  There  is  an  abundance 

of  literature  about  the  various  techniques:  some  is  good 

Airway  clearance  techniques  for  pediatric  and  adult  pa-  science:  some  not  so  good.  But  all  of  it  boils  down  to 

tients  have  improved  and  changed  dramatically  over  the  enhancing  the  ability  to  clear  secretions  from  the  airways 

of  sick  lungs.  The  respiratory  therapist  is  responsible  for 
introducing  patients  Id  the  various  techniques  at  the  ap- 


Kathryn  L  Dasidson  RRT  is  affiliated  with  the  Respirator)'  Care  Depart- 
ment. Primary  Children's  Medical  Center.  Salt  Lake  City.  Utah.  

Ms  Davidson  presented  a  version  of  this  repon  at  the  17th  Annual  New  Correspondence:  Kathryn  L  Davidson  RRT.  Respiratory  Care  Depart- 

Horizons  Symposium  at  the  47lh  International  Respiratory  Congress.  San  ment.  Primary  Children's  Medical  Center.  100  N  Medical  Drive.  Sail 

Antonio.  Texas.  December  14.  2001.  Lake  City  UT  841  \i.  E-mail:  pckdavid@ihc.com. 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7  823 


Airway  Ci.farancf.  Strategies  for  thf:  P[-;diatric  Patient 


propriate  ages.  Not  nuich  has  been  published  wilh  regard 
ti)  when  to  start  the  various  iechiiic|Lies.  which  leehniques 
are  clinically  uselnl  at  what  age.  and  in  what  order  we 
should  teach  them.  'I'his  review  addresses  llu)se  questions 
with  regard  to  pediatric  cystic  fibrosis  (CF)  patients.  My 
purpose  here  is  not  to  discuss  the  pros  and  cons  of  the 
science  behind  the  technic|ues  or  how  to  do  the  techniques, 
but.  rather,  when,  how,  and  why  to  incorporate  them  into 
the  life  of  a  young  CF  patient.  Many  of  the  airway  clear- 
ance techniques  can  be  used  with  other  patient  populations 
as  well,  but  the  focus  here  is  to  provide  information  clin- 
ically relevant  and  useful  to  CF  patients. 

Adherence 

The  key  to  CF  care  is  patient  adherence  to  therapy,  and 
it  is  important  to  instill  adherence  at  a  very  young  age.  CF 
patients  should  grow  up  with  the  feeling  that  doing  their 
therapy  is  as  important  as  brushing  their  teeth  or  going  to 
school — facts  of  life  and  behaviors  that  are  not  optional. 

Remember  that  CF  is  the  patient's  disease,  not  the  par- 
ents" disease.  The  family  is  very  important,  but  the  em- 
phasis should  always  be  on  teaching  the  child  to  care  for 
him  or  her  self.  Traditional  chest  physiotherapy  (CPT)  is 
not  very  conducive  to  that  recognition,  because  it  requires 
a  caregiver  (usually  a  parent)  and  a  young  child  cannot  do 
CPT  alone.'  But  there  are  several  quite  effective  tech- 
niques that  a  child  can  learn  to  do  alone. 

The  ability  to  perform  therapy  independently — without 
equipment  or  the  presence  of  a  caregiver — is  very  impor- 
tant. These  children  are  only  "patients"  when  they  are  in 
the  hospital  or  clinic:  the  rest  of  the  time  they  are  just  kids, 
with  plans,  activities,  and  lives  to  lead.  Most  kids  like  to 
have  sleepovers  with  friends:  how  difficult  it  must  be  to 
try  to  plan  a  sleepover  and  still  leave  time  for  mom  or  dad 
to  do  your  CPT.  How  much  nicer  it  would  be  to  be  able  to 
go  to  your  friend's  house  and  be  able  to  independently 
take  20  min  out  of  the  evening  to  do  your  active  cycle  of 
breathing  technique  (ACBT)  and  then  go  back  to  playing 
with  your  friend.  The  child  would  thus  accomplish  2  dis- 
tinct things:  doing  the  therapy  and  living  a  normal,  inde- 
pendent life! 

All  therapies  that  can  be  taught  to  adults  can  be  taught 
to  children — and  should  be.  Some  techniques  must  be  ad- 
justed; others  should  probably  wail  until  the  child  reaches 
a  certain  age.  The  point  is  to  introduce  various  airway 
clearance  techniques  so  the  patient  has  several  to  choose 
from.  You  want  the  patient  to  be  at  least  familiar  with  all 
the  techniques.  As  the  patient  becomes  proficient  in  the 
various  techniques,  one  technic|ue  may  prove  more  effec- 
tive. It  is  equally  important  to  teach  children  and  their 
parents  that  one  technic|ue  may  work  better  than  another  at 
certain  times,  because  the  dynamics  within  the  CF  lung 
change  over  time — sometimes  quite  rajiidly  in  the  pres- 


ence of  infection.  The  motto  should  be  "If  I'm  not  moving 
mucus,  1  should  try  a  different  technique."  No  one  tech- 
nique is  perfect  for  every  lung  condition.  It  takes  time  to 
master  the  various  techniques,  hut  knowledge  is  a  power- 
ful tool  in  CF. 

Chest  Phy.siothcrapy 

Percussion  and  postural  drainage  is  the  traditional  form 
of  airway  clearance  for  CF.-  It  is  the  first  airway  clearance 
technique  taught  to  parents,  from  infancy  on  up.  Outside 
the  United  States,  other  techniques  are  used  with  newborns 
through  4-year-olds.  Mask  positive  expiratory  pressure 
(PEP)  is  used  from  infancy  to  adulthood  in  some  European 
countries.  Bubble  PEP  is  used  for  toddlers.  In  Belgium  a 
modified  version  of  autogenic  drainage  (AD)  is  used  with 
infants.  We  do  not  use  these  techniques  often  in  the  United 
States  with  the  infant  population,  and  a  detailed  discussion 
of  the  merits  and  demerits  of  these  therapies  with  babies  is 
beyond  the  scope  of  this  review. 

At  my  institution  we  use  a  5-position  modified  CPT 
routine  (Table  I ).  Always  remember  that  CPT  requires  an 
additional  caregiver.  Many  of  our  patients'  parents  have 
other  children  to  care  for.  careers,  and  hobbies — they  have 
a  life  outside  of  CF.'  And  parents  usually  do  not  modify 
therapy  on  their  own:  they  either  do  it  as  they  were  in- 
structed or  they  don't  do  it  at  all.  Our  goal  should  be  to 
make  therapy  something  they  can  accomplish  in  a  reason- 
able period  of  time.  A  12-position.  full  CPT  treatment 
takes  a  minimum  of  45  min  to  an  hour.  It  is  important  to 
reduce  that  time  so  that  parents  can  reasonably  accomplish 
some  therapy.  In  real  life  it  is  quite  difficult  for  a  parent  to 
conduct  an  hour  of  therapy  in  the  morning  while  they  are 
trying  to  deal  with  all  the  other  parts  of  hectic  early  morn- 


Table  I.       Five-Position  Modified  Chest  Physiotherapy 

Two  Uprighl  Posilians 

1 .  Anterior  apices  on  both  sides  of  the  sternum 

2.  Posterior  apices  ori  both  sides  of  the  spine 
Percuss  the  upper  third  of  the  chest  only. 

The  front  can  be  done  with  the  patient  leaning  sliyhth  backward. 
The  back  can  be  done  with  the  patient  leaning  slightly  forward. 
Thrci'  Treiulelenhiirg  Posilions* 

3.  With  the  patient  lying  on  his  or  her  left  side,  percuss  the  right 
side  from  the  armpit  to  the  bottom  of  the  rib  cage.  mo\'ing  over 
the  anterior  middle  chest  if  possible. 

4.  Wilh  the  palieni  lying  on  his  or  her  stomach,  percuss  the  bottom 
two  thirds  of  the  back  on  both  sides  of  the  spine. 

5.  With  the  palieni  lying  on  his  or  her  right  side,  percuss  the  left 
side  from  the  armpit  to  the  bottom  of  the  rib  cage.  mo\  ing  over 
the  anterior  middle  chest  if  possible. 


•Trendelenburg  poMlion  is  onl\  tor  pjliciils  over  2  yean.  old.  Use  a  nal-lying  position  if  the 
patient  is  under  2  years  old  or  a  slightly  upright  position  \i  the  patient  has  reflux. 


824 


Rh-spirator^'  Carf  •  JiiLV  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Airway  Clharanci;  STRATHciins  ior  the  Pediatric  Paiii;ni' 


ings.  As  many  as  209c  of  our  families  have  more  tliaii  I 
child  with  CF.  which  increases  the  careiziver's  tasks  greatly. 
They  may  have  other  children  to  get  off  to  scIkhiI.  a  joh  to 
get  readv  for.  and  breakfasts  land  medications)  to  prepare. 
Thus,  the  5-pi)siiion  modified  CPT  routine  facilitates  ad- 
herence; we  siri\e  to  make  it  a  reasonable  undertaking  for 
a  busy  parent. 

It  is  also  important  to  standardize  care  among  the  hos- 
pital, home  care  company,  outpatient  clinic,  and  home. 
Caregi\ers  bect)me  confused  if  each  entity  does  the  ther- 
ap\  differently.  We  have  taught  all  our  Imme  care  com- 
panies, hospital-based  therapists,  and  clinic  personnel  the 
same  5-position  CPT  regimen,  and  repetition  of  the  same 
therapy  by  each  entity  cements  the  process  in  the  parents' 
minds,  so  they  ha\e  little  or  no  trouble  remembering  ex- 
actly how  to  do  the  therapy. 

In  the  .^-position  modified  CPT  routine  described  in 
Table  1.  the  lower  areas  of  the  chest  are  done  in  Tren- 
delenburg positii)n.  though  Trendelenburg  should  be  used 
only  w  ith  children  o\  er  age  2.  CF  patients  have  a  very  high 
incidence  of  gastric  retlux.  and  infants  and  toddlers  put  in 
Trendelenburg  position  for  CPT  have  a  higher  rate  of  com- 
plications from  their  CF.  including  more  hospitalizations, 
more  upper  and  lower  respiratory  tract  infections,  and  wor.se 
chest  radiograph  scores.  With  patients  under  age  2.  CPT 
should  be  done  in  a  fiat  position,  not  in  Trendelenburg.  For 
patients  with  known  gastric  reflux.  CPT  can  be  done  in  a 
slightly  upright  position,  depending  on  the  individual  pa- 
tient's circumstances.-'-'' 

Each  of  the  5  areas  should  receive  5  min  of  percussion. 
This  can  change  when  a  child  reaches  the  magical  "age  of 
manipulation."  When  kids  reach  3-4  years  of  age  they 
have  learned  the  art  of  manipulation:  they  have  learned  the 
use  and  power  of  the  word  "Nol"  Parents  need  to  be  in- 
stnjcted  through  this  phase  not  to  skip  any  of  the  positions. 
However,  they  can  shorten  the  percussion  time  for  each 
position.  Sometimes  it  ends  up  at  I  min  per  position,  but 
all  positions  are  done.  This  way  the  child  learns  that,  even 
if  they  kick,  scream,  cry,  or  bite,  his  parents  are  still  going 
to  do  the  therapy.  It  is  the  young  patient's  first  lesson  in 
the  importance  of  airway  clearance  and  adherence:  therapy 
is  so  important  that  even  if  he  does  tenible  things  his 
parents  still  do  it!  We  teach  diversion  techniques  such  as 
watching  a  special  video  or  reading  a  special  book  as  a 
reward  for  being  good  during  therapy. 

Breathing  Gaines 

At  about  9  months,  babies  become  very  good  at  imitat- 
ing their  family  members.  This  age  child  can  be  taught  to 
cough  on  command.  In  the  same  way  parents  teach  the 
child  to  wave  bye-bye.  they  can  teach  him  to  cough.  This 
generally  involves  lots  of  clapping,  cheering,  and  laughter. 
The  hospital-based  therapist  teaches  the  parents  to  teach 


their  child.  The  baby  imitating  a  cough  is  the  first  real 
"breathing  game."  and  once  ihe  child  has  accomplished 
this,  it  should  be  incorporated  into  his  CPT.  In  between 
CPT  jiositions,  the  infant  is  eneiiuraged  to  play  breathing 
games. 

Breathing  games  are  the  beginnings  of  advanced  airway 
clearance  for  toddlers.  The  purpose  is  to  have  a  fun  way  to 
begin  deep  breathing  and  controlled  exhalation  with  young 
patients  whii  would  not  otherwise  accomplish  these  tasks. 
There  are  many  types  of  breathing  games  (Table  2).  in- 
cluding toy  wind  instruments. 

Start  with  the  easiest  games  and  incorporate  them  into 
the  CPT.  Percuss  the  appropriate  segment  for  3-3  min. 
then  stop  and  have  the  child  blow  on  a  pin  wheel  for  a  few 
minutes,  then  continue  on  to  the  next  CPT  percussion 
segment.  As  a  child  matures  and  becomes  able,  move  the 
object  farther  away,  which  requires  progressively  larger 
breaths  to  blow  the  object. 

Keep  in  mind  the  attention  span  of  very  young  children. 
Alternating  games  throughout  the  treatment  may  be  help- 
ful, though  some  children  want  only  to  blow  that  brightly 
colored  feather  off  your  hand — nothing  else  will  do!  Go 
with  the  child's  wants  and  needs.  A  "CPT  toy  box"  should 
be  recommended  to  all  parents.  This  special  box  contains 
all  the  makings  of  fun  breathing  games,  including  those 
coveted  musical  wind  instruments.  The  toy  box  comes  out 
only  during  treatment  times;  this  keeps  it  special  in  the 
child's  view.  (As  well,  many  parents  are  more  than  happy 
to  keep  the  musical  instruments  packed  away  except  dur- 
ing treatment  times!) 

Diaphragmatic  Breathing  and  Huffing 

The  long-term  purpose  of  these  games  is  to  teach  dia- 
phragmatic breathing  and  huffing,  which  are  the  basis  for 
all  the  advanced  airway  clearance  techniques.  As  the  child 
gets  older  you  can  start  to  use  the  time  in  between  CPT 
segments  to  teach  "belly  breathing."  Younger  children  can 
be  taught  diaphragmatic  breathing  by  using  a  small  stuffed 
animal  set  on  the  abdomen:  as  the  air  goes  in,  the  bear  goes 
up;  as  the  air  goes  out,  the  bear  goes  down.  Older  children 
who  have  difficulty  synchronizing  the  diaphragm  will  ben- 
efit from  a  heavier  object,  such  as  a  book,  on  the  abdomen 


Table  : 


Breathing  Games 


•  Blowing  bubbles 

•  Bliiwing  on  pinw  heels 

•  Blowing  anion  balls  or  pom-poms  or  (ealhers  oil  an  open  palm 

•  Paper  sailboat  races  across  the  balhiub 

•  Race  cotton  balls  across  the  table  using  "air  power" 

•  Blowing  out  candles;  progressively  move  the  candle  larther  away 

•  Musical  wind  instruments  played  with  gusto 


Respiratory  Cari-;  •  July  2002  Vol,  47  No  7 


825 


Airway  Clearance  Strategies  for  the  Pediatric  Patient 


while  learning  or  perfecting  the  skill  of  diaphragmatic 
breathing.  Teaching  this  is  best  accomplished  with  the 
child  supine  with  the  knees  up. 

Start  to  incorporate  huffing  into  the  teaching  around 
3-4  years  of  age.  The  child  needs  to  know  diaphragmatic 
breathing  before  you  introduce  huffing.  This  is  taking 
breathing  games  to  the  next  level.  Modified  versions  of  the 
same  games  can  be  used  to  accomplish  low  and  high  huffs. 
Modify  the  game  of  "'blowing  a  cotton  ball  off  an  open 
palm"  by  having  the  child  hold  a  cardboard  mouthpiece  in 
between  the  teeth  and  "huff  the  cotton  ball  off  the  palm. 
This  changes  the  mechanism  from  blowing  (as  through 
pursed  lips)  to  huffing,  which  is  through  an  open  glottis 
and  emanates  from  the  chest  and  airways,  not  the  throat. 

Making  the  leap  from  randomly  huffing  a  cotton  ball  to 
doing  high  and  low  huffs  is  not  too  difficult  at  this  point. 
Low  huffs  use  a  tidal  volume  or  slightly  larger  than  tidal 
volume  breath,  a  breath-hold  of  several  seconds,  then  a 
slow,  controlled  exhalation;  this  is  the  "slow  and  easy" 
huff.  The  high  huff  requires  a  vital  capacity  breath,  breath- 
hold,  then  a  strong,  short  exhalation:  this  is  the  "strong  and 
fast"  huff.  It  can  be  helpful  to  teach  the  child  to  "wiggle" 
the  cotton  ball  with  the  low  huff  and  to  "blow  it  off"  with 
the  high  huff.  You  can  also  use  a  facial  tissue  held  up  in 
front  of  the  mouthpiece  to  demonstrate  the  difference  be- 
tween how  the  tissue  flutters  with  a  low  huff  versus  a  high 
huff.  Disposable  cardboard  mouthpieces  are  readily  avail- 
able and  work  well  with  small  children,  but  you  will  need 
a  supply  of  these  as  they  are  not  durable.  Any  large-orifice 
short  tube  can  be  used  (eg,  a  T-piece  connector  from  a 
nebulizer  or  a  nondisposable  pulmonary  function  test 
mouthpiece). 

There  are  many  huffing  games  that  can  be  used  to  teach 
the  art  of  high  and  low  huffing.  A  mirror  is  a  valuable  aid 
to  this  endeavor.  Little  children  can  play  a  ""3  little  pigs'" 
game  and  "huff  and  puff  into  the  mirror.  Older  children 
can  be  taught  just  by  having  them  fog  up  the  mirror  ap- 
propriately. 

Active  Cycle  of  Breathing  Technique 

Once  a  child  has  learned  diaphragmatic  breathing  and 
huff,  he  or  she  is  ready  to  move  on.  From  about  4  years  of 
age  most  are  ready  for  several  different  airway  clearance 
techniques  (Table  3),  including  ACBT,  which  is  a  combi- 
nation of  diaphragmatic  deep  breathing,  breath  holds,  and 
huffing  (Fig.  1).^  At  this  point,  decrease  the  amount  of 
percussion  time  and  increase  the  time  devoted  to  teaching 
ACBT,  eventually  switching  completely  to  just  ACBT  for 
20  min.  My  institution  recommends  20  min  of  airway 
clearance  per  session,  which  can  be  by  any  method  and 
can  be  combined  with  medication  delivery,  such  as  albu- 
terol or  dornase  alfa.  Use  of  a  kitchen  timer  is  encouraged. 
The  switch  to  ACBT  generally  occurs  around  4-5  years  of 


Table  3.      Airway  Clearance  Techniques  by  Age 

Infants  Chest  physiotherapy 

Toddlers  Chest  physiotherapy  and  breathing  games 

2—4  year  olds  Chest  physiotherapy,  breathing  games,  belly 

breathing,  and  hulTing 
^  4  years  old  Chest  physiotherapy,  active  cycle  of  breathing 

technique,  and  beyond 


age,  but  the  decision  of  when  to  switch  depends  on  the 
family  dynamics  and  the  individual  child. 

ACBT  does  not  need  to  be  combined  with  any  other 
therapy.  While  ACBT  is  being  taught,  parents  and  care- 


Fig.  1.  Active  cycle  of  breathing  technique. 


826 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


AiRw \v  Clearance  Strategihs  ior  thh  Phdiatrr-  Path  ni 


givers  may  question  the  adequacy  of  the  therapy  and  may 
v\ant  to  supplement  early  ACBT  with  modified  CPT.  Chil- 
dren should  he  taught  ACBT  and  should  practice  il  lor 
several  months  before  moving  on  to  another  form  of  ther- 
apy. Younger  children  generally  need  quite  a  bit  of  coach- 
ing: but  as  the\  learn  the  routine,  the  coaching  sessions  can 
be  reduced.  It  is  important  during  hospitalizations  to  re- 
view the  therapies  the  patient  already  knows:  Can  they  do 
ACBT  on  their  own  without  coaching'  Are  they  using 
good  positioning?  Are  their  huffs  producli\e?  Are  they 
doing  it  for  20  minutes? 

Positive  Expiratory  Pressure  Therapy 

Once  the  child  is  able  to  pertbrm  diaphragmatic  breath- 
ing, huffing,  and  ACBT  with  appropriate  breath  holding 
(this  is  usually  around  6-7  years  of  age),  move  on  to  PEP 
therapy.'^"  My  institution  uses  the  TheraPEP  de\  ice  (DHD 
Healthcare.  Wampsville,  New  York),  in  part  because  it  has 
a  built  in  manometer  sNstem  that  we  believe  is  imperative 
for  teaching  young  children  to  do  PEP  therapy  correctly. 
Some  aerosol  treatments  are  given  in-line  with  the  Thera- 
PEP. so  therapy  time  is  brief  (20  min).  The  TheraPEP 
produces  a  positive  expiratory  pressure  of  10-20  cm  H^O. 
It  has  several  sizes  of  fixed-orifice  resistor  hole  by  which 
to  \ar\'  the  pressure  and  flow  to  achieve  the  proper  PEP. 
making  the  device  useful  for  a  wide  range  of  pulmonary 
function  levels.  The  inspiratory  side  is  unobstructed.  The 
device  does  not  require  any  pressurized  gas  or  other  power 
source  (other  than  a  pair  of  lungs). 

Patients  are  taught  to  do  15  PEP  breaths  in  a  nnv.  with 
good  posture  and  breathing  technique,  after  which  they 
stop  and  do  a  cycle  of  ACBT  or  (if  they  know  it)  AD. 
Once  a  patient  has  learned  AD.  he  or  she  can  choose  either 
ACBT  or  AD  for  use  in  between  sets  of  PEP.  The  cycles 
of  PEP  and  ACBT  are  repeated  for  20  min. 

High-Frequency  Chest  Wall  Oscillation 

High-frequency  chest  wall  oscillation  (HFCWO)  is  an 
alternati\e  therapy.  The  Vest  (Advanced  Respiratory.  St 
Paul.  Minnesota)  is  a  device  that  consists  of  an  intlalable 
vest  connected  by  hoses  to  an  air  pulse  generator  that 
rapidly  inflates  and  deflates  the  vest,  gently  compressing 
and  releasing  the  chest  wall  to  create  high-frequency  os- 
cillatory air  flow  within  the  lungs,  which  results  in  cough- 
like shear  forces  and  alters  the  ph)  sical  properties  of  the 
mucus,  thus  increasing  mucus  mobilization.'"  '-  HFCWO 
therapy  generally  takes  about  30  min:  20  min  of  oscillation 
time  and  additional  time  for  huffing  or  coughing. 

HFCWO  can  be  very  useful  in  households  that  ha\e 
more  than  one  child  with  CF.  The  Vest  can  also  be  helpful 
with  patients  who  have  problems  with  adherence.  Because 
The  Vest  requires  little  or  no  patient  concentration,  the 


patient  can  do  other  things,  such  as  play  video  games, 
explore  the  Internet,  or  watch  television.  However,  pa- 
tients with  serious  adherence  problem  may  not  fare  any 
better  with  The  Vest.  In  any  event,  all  patients  should 
know  several  therapies  and  use  them,  as  no  one  form  of 
airway  clearance  is  going  to  be  the  right  one  all  the  time. 

One  advantage  of  The  Vest  is  that  it  has  a  built-in  meter 
that  monitors  the  hours  the  system  has  been  in  use,  which 
allows  the  clinician  to  determine  adherence  and  thus  make 
appropriate  decisions  regarding  the  efficacy  of  keeping  the 
machine  in  that  patient's  home. 

There  are  a  few  down  sides  to  The  Vest.  It  is  not  very 
portable;  it  is  rather  noisy,  quite  expensive,  and  does  not 
dispense  with  the  need  for  huffing. 

The  Vest  can  be  used  with  a  patient  who  has  a  gastros- 
tomy tube  or  an  indwelling  tunnelled  intravenous  access 
catheter.  To  do  so,  foam  can  be  cut  to  size  to  surround  the 
area  of  the  gastrostomy  tube  or  catheter,  or  the  vest  buck- 
les around  that  area  can  he  left  undone. 

Oscillating  Positive  Expiratory  Pressure 

At  my  institution,  oscillating  PEP  is  used  only  as  an 
adjunct  therapy. ' '  Many  centers  use  it  as  a  primary  form  of 
airway  clearance.  The  patient  can  use  it  for  5  of  the  20 
minutes  of  the  treatment  time  or  use  it  after  the  regular 
therapy  if  he  or  she  chooses.  The  oscillating  PEP  valve  is 
very  patient-dependent.  We  have  found  it  difficult  to  eval- 
uate the  adequacy  of  this  therapy  and  also  that  it  is  difficult 
for  children  to  master  effectively.  If  it  is  chosen  for  use 
with  a  pediatric  patient,  it  is  imperative  that  the  patient  is 
thoroughly  and  carefully  trained  and  that  the  patient's  tech- 
nique be  evaluated  over  lime. 

Autogenic  Drainage 

At  my  institution,  we  begin  to  teach  AD^ '"'"'  when  the 
patient  is  around  1 2  years  of  age.  We  have  found  that  the 
patient  needs  to  have  a  fair  amount  of  concentration  to 
master  the  technique,  but,  once  mastered,  it  is  very  effec- 
tive. In  Belgium,  where  the  technique  was  developed,  a 
version  of  AD  is  used  from  infancy  on.  This  is  a  very 
intriguing  concept,  but  we  have  not  had  much  success  in 
getting  our  younger  patients  to  master  it. 

When  AD  is  taught,  the  environment  must  be  conducive 
to  learning.  A  quiet  room  w  ith  no  distractions  is  necessary. 
Because  teaching  AD  is  a  very  "hands-on"  experience,  it 
is  wise  to  set  up  the  room  appropriately.  The  best  way  we 
have  found  is  to  have  2  straight-back  chairs  placed  in  a 
row.  The  therapist  sits  behind  the  patient,  where  he  or  she 
can  coach  the  patient  through  the  breathing.  It  is  best  to 
have  one  hand  placed  on  the  lower  rib  cage/upper  abdo- 
men to  feel  diaphragm  movement.  The  other  hand  is  free 
to  be  placed  wheie  needed.  For  example,  if  the  patient  has 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


827 


Airway  Clearance  Strategies  for  the  Pediatric  Patient 


a  tendency  to  use  his  or  her  shoulders  when  taking  deep 
breaths  instead  ofusinji  the  diaphragm,  the  therapist  should 
place  the  left  hand  on  the  diaphragm  and  the  right  hand  on 
the  patient's  right  shoulder,  pressing  down  slightly  to  en- 
courage use  of  the  diaphragm  and  remind  the  patient  not  to 
use  the  shoulders.  The  right  hand  can  also  feel  the  back  to 
locate  areas  of  secretions,  and  then  the  patient  can  use 
directed  breathing  to  try  to  get  more  air  to  that  area.  The 
therapist  should  be  leaning  in  close  to  the  patient  while 
coaching  so  he  or  she  can  hear  the  exhalations  and  crack- 
les that  indicate  the  right  time  to  move  on  to  the  next  level. 
Patients  and  families  need  to  be  aware  of  the  closeness 
of  the  coach  during  instruction.  When  appropriate,  a  chap- 
crone  should  be  present.  Patients  (especially  young  ones) 
usually  need  several  good  coaching  sessions  before  they 
can  do  AD  on  their  own.  Many  teenagers  like  to  do  AD  to 
music.  I  recommend  to  them  to  create  a  20-min  tape  of 
their  favorite  soothing  music  to  play  while  doing  their  AD: 
when  the  tape  is  done,  so  is  the  AD  session. 

Summary 

Alternative  airway  clearance  techniques  such  as  AD, 
ACBT.  PEP,  and  oscillating  PEP  are  now  being  used  more 
frequently  in  the  CF  and  non-CF  patient  populations.  These 
therapies  can  be  tried  with  patients  who  suffer  mucus  re- 
tention that  is  not  responsive  to  spontaneous  or  directed 
coughing  (eg,  an  asthma  patient  who  cannot  clear  sputum 
with  coughing).  The  practitioner  must  be  very  careful  when 
using  PEP  (and  some  of  the  other  therapies)  to  assure  that 
the  therapy  is  not  causing  further  airway  collapse.  Wheez- 
ing indicates  dynamic  collapse,  and  the  air  flow  must  be 
slowed  for  the  therapy  to  be  effective.  Patients  need  to  be 
well  trained  in  this  modality  to  benefit  from  its  mucus- 
clearing  effect. 

CF  patients  and  their  families  should  be  knowledgeable 
about  all  methods  of  airway  clearance.  Start  with  modified 
traditional  CPT  and  add  in  therapies  as  the  patient  grows 
older.  It  is  very  important  to  teach  the  families  as  well, 
because  most  of  the  patient's  early  education  about  airway 
clearance  is  going  to  happen  at  home.  The  therapist  should 
strive  to  teach  the  patient  independence  in  airway  clear- 
ance and  to  teach  many  different  methods  of  airway  clear- 
ance. The  goal  is  always  to  improve  mucus  clearance,  and 
if  that  goal  isn't  being  met,  the  patient  should  have  several 
forms  of  therapy  to  try.  Remember:  it  may  take  a  variety 
of  therapies  to  move  mucus! 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  sincerely  thank  Barbara  Chalt'ield  MD  for  her  contrihuticm  to  the  prep- 
aration ol  this  review. 


REFERENCES 

1 .  Passero  MA.  Remor  B.  Salomon  J.  Patient-reported  compliance  with 
cystic  fibrosis  therapy.  Clin  Pedialr  (Phila)  I98I;2()(4):264-268. 

2.  Matthews  LW,  Doershuk  CF,  Wise  M,  et  al.  A  therapeutic  regimen 
for  patients  with  cystic  fibrosis.  J  Pedialr  I964;65:.S.'>8-575. 

3.  Davies  LK.  Comparison  of  dependent-care  activities  for  well  sib- 
lings of  children  with  cystic  fibrosis  and  well  siblings  in  families 
without  children  with  chronic  illness.  Issues  Compr  Pediatr  Nurs 
mW;l(i(2):91-98. 

4.  Button  BM,  Heine  RG.  Calto-Smith  AG.  el  al.  Postural  drainage  in 
infants:  to  lip  or  not  to  tip.  that  is  the  question  (abstract).  Pediatr 
Pulmonol  SuppI  1995;12:108-109. 

5.  Button  BM.  Heine  RG.  Catto-Smith  AG.  Phelan  PD.  Postural  drain- 
age in  cystic  fibrosis:  is  there  a  link  with  gastro-oesophageal  retlu.x'.' 
J  Paediatr  Child  Health  1 998:34(4):  330-334. 

6.  Button  BM,  Heine  RG.  Catto-Smith  AG,  Phelan  PD,  Olinsky  A. 
Postural  drainage  and  gastro-esophageal  retlux  in  infants  with  cystic 
fibrosis.  Arch  Dis  Child  1997:76(2):  148-150. 

7.  Miller  S.  Hall  DO.  Clayton  CB.  Nelson  R.  Chest  physiotherapy  in 
cystic  fibrosis:  a  comparative  study  of  autogenic  drainage  and  the 
active  cycle  of  breathing  techniques  with  postural  drainage.  Thorax 
1995:50(2):  165-169. 

8.  Falk  M,  KeLstrup  M,  Andersen  JB,  Kinoshita  T,  Falk  P.  Stovring  S. 
Gothgen  I.  Improving  the  ketchup  bottle  method  with  positive  ex- 
piratory pressure,  PEP.  in  cystic  fibrosis.  Eur  J  Respir  Dis  1984; 
65(6):423-432. 

9.  Hofmeyr  JL.  Webber  BA,  Hodson  ME.  Evaluation  of  positive  ex- 
piratory pressure  as  an  adjunct  to  chest  physiotherapy  in  the  treat- 
ment of  cystic  fibrosis.  Thorax  1986:4l(l2):95l-954. 

10.  Hansen  LG,  Warwick  WJ,  Hansen  KL,  Mucus  transport  mechanisms 
in  relation  to  the  effect  of  high  frequency  chest  compression  (HFCC) 
on  mucus  clearance.  Pediatr  Pulmonol  I994;I7(2):I  I3-1 18. 

11.  King  M.  Zidulka  A.  Phillips  DM,  Wight  D,  Goss  D.  Chang  HK. 
Tracheal  mucus  clearance  in  high-frequency  oscillation:  effect  of 
peak  fiow  rate  bias.  Eur  Respir  J  I990;3(  1  ):6-l3. 

12.  Majaesic  CM,  Montgomery  M,  Jones  R,  et  al.  Reduction  in  sputum 
viscosity  using  high  frequency  chest  compression  compared  to  con- 
ventional chest  physiotherapy  (abstract).  Pediatr  Pulmonol  SuppI 
I996;I3:A358. 

13.  McIIwaine  PM,  Wong  LT.  Peacock  D,  Davidson  AG.  Long-term 
comparative  trial  of  positive  expiratory  pressure  versus  oscillating 
positive  expiratory  pressure  (flutter)  physiotherapy  in  the  treatment 
of  cystic  fibrosis.  J  Pediatr  200l:l3S(6):S45-850. 

14.  Schoni  MH.  Autogenic  drainage:  a  modern  .ipproach  to  physiother- 
apy in  cystic  fibrosis.  J  R  Soc  Med  l989;Suppl  16:32-37. 

15.  Davidson  AGF,  McIIwaine  PM,  Wong  LTK,  et  al.  A  comparative 
trial  of  positive  expiratory  pressure,  autogenic  drainage  and  conven- 
tional percussion  and  drainage  techniques  (abstract),  Pediatr  Pulmo- 
nol SuppI  I988;2:I36A. 

16.  Lindemann  H.  Boldl  A,  Kieselmann  R.  Autogenic  drainage:  efficacy 
of  a  simplified  method.  Acta  Univ  Carol  [Med|  (Praha)  I990;36(I- 
4);2I0-2I2. 


828 


Ri;spiR.ATORY  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Ki'vk'Ks  of  Itciiiks  and  Otlior  Media.  Nolo  lu  publishers:  Sfiid  review  copies  of  books.  Illins, 
lapes.  and  software  lo  Rlshratory  Cahe,  6IX)  Ninlh  Avenue.  Suite  702.  Sualtle  WA  98104. 


Books,  Films, 
Tapes,  &  Software 


Physiotherapj  in  Re.spiratorv  Care:  .\n 
K\idenc'i'- Based  .Vpproach  to  Respiratory 
and  Cardiac  Management,  mJ  cdicicm.  Al- 
exunilni  Hoogti.  t'hcltcnh;i[ii.  L'nited  King- 
dom: NclsDii  Thornes  Ltd.  2001 .  Soft  co\er. 
illustrated.  550  pages.  S39. 

This  text  pro\ ides  iwideis  witli  an  under- 
standing ot  how  functioning  and  quahty  of 
life  are  impacted  by  cardiovascular/pulmo- 
nary dysfunction  or  failure  (ie.  compromised 
oxygen  transport  system).  The  book  empha- 
sizes the  pulmonary  system  and  acute,  life- 
threatening,  chronic,  and  disabling  diseases. 

The  book  uses  radiographs,  drawings, 
cartoons,  diagrams,  pictures  of  patients, 
quotes  from  patients  and  recognized  author- 
ities, and  relevant  references  to  the  scien- 
tific literature.  It  provides  opportunities  for 
cerebral  exercise  with  its  case  studies  and 
interpretative  analysis/response  at  the  end 
of  each  of  the  17  chapters.  In  addition,  a 
brief  literature  appraisal  is  offered,  chapter 
by  chapter,  to  prompt  personal  reflection 
and  critique.  For  example,  page  1 18  quotes 
the  fin7/.v// ,/()(//■/;((/ o/Micv;/)!;:  "Bars  of  soap, 
if  used,  should  be  kept  dry,"  with  the  re- 
sponse added,  "That's  a  good  idea."  in  ref- 
erence to  avoiding  a  potential  culture  me- 
dium for  bacteria  growth. 

Compared  to  its  first  edition  ( 1991 )  and 
second  edition  ( 1996).  this  third  edition  has 
more  of  everything:  pages  (243.  365.  and 
550.  respectively),  radiographs,  content  re- 
source infonnation  (Appendixes  A  through 
F),  clinical  applications,  cartoons,  tables, 
graphs,  and  craftily  highlighted  (sky-blue) 
text  material. 

In  all  3  editions  the  author  has  targeted 
her  readership  to  be  physiotherapy  students 
and  clinicians  and  nurse  specialists  in  respi- 
ratory and  intensive  care.  As  a  physical  ther- 
apist educator  and  clinical  specialist  I  did 
not  find  the  content  lo  be  descnptive  of  the 
way  a  physical  therapist  would  conduct  clin- 
ical practice  in  the  United  States.  The  book 
focused  primarily  on  one  (cardiovascular/ 
pulmonary)  of  the  4  (neuromuscular,  mus- 
culoskeletal, integumentary)  "Preferred 
Practice  Patterns"  published  in  the  Guide  lo 
Physical  Therapist  Practice.  This  text  ap- 
plies intervention  strategies  of  postural 
drainage  therapy,  as  operationally  defined 
in  the  American  Association  for  Respira- 


tory Care's  Clinical  Practice  Guidelines. 
Thus,  the  book  emphasizes  care  for  persons 
with  pulmonary /cardiovascular  compromise 
to  be  more  clinically  generic  among  disci- 
plines, not  exclusive  to  the  physiotherapist 
or  nurse  specialist  in  respiratory  care  alone. 
Enhancing  oxygen  transport  is  basic  to  car- 
ing for  eveiy  patient. 

I  found  this  third  edition  to  be  well  or- 
ganized and  reader-friendly.  Similar  to  the 
previous  editions,  the  writing  style  uses  Brit- 
ish spellings,  such  as  "colour,"  "oedema," 
"aetiology,"  "laboured,"  and  "anaemic." 
Once  the  reader  acclimates  to  that  style,  it 
ceases  to  be  distracting.  However,  the  text 
is  peppered  throughout  with  references  to 
and  familiarity  with  British  culture.  For  ex- 
ample, most  of  Appendix  C  (Resources)  per- 
tains only  to  the  United  Kingdom,  and  some 
British  colloquialisms  go  unexplained  (eg, 
"take  the  odd  potter  to  the  toilet"  (page  73). 
But  these  are  shoilcomings  that  can  easily 
be  overlooked. 

The  author  and  publisher  promote  this 
book  as  being  evidenced-based,  whereas  ear- 
lier editions  were  labeled  as  espousing  a 
problem-solving  approach.  Frankly,  I  found 
this  edition  no  more  evidenced-based  than 
the  previous  editions,  though  the  cited  lit- 
erature was  updated  and  appropriate.  Nev- 
ertheless, no  meta-analyses  were  included. 
On  the  other  hand.  I  thought  this  edition 
used  more  of  a  problem-solving  approach 
than  either  of  the  previous  editions.  The  case 
studies  given  in  each  chapter  are  new  to  this 
edition. 

The  author's  use  of  subtle  humor  was 
usually  amusing  and  refreshing:  listen  "op- 
timistically for  bowel  sounds  over  the  kid- 
ney" (page  41);  "blow  the  living  daylights 
out  of  the  machine"  (page  58);  "tattooed 
archbishop"  (page  167);  "Man  should  no 
more  breathe  through  his  mouth  than  take 
food  through  his  nose"  (page  302).  How- 
ever, certain  of  the  attempts  at  humor  were 
crude  and  offensive,  such  as  the  cartoon  on 
page  362.  in  which  a  female  physiotherapist 
is  doing  calisthenics  while  lying  on  her  male 
patient's  chest  in  a  hospital  bed. 

The  author  and  publisher  might  not  be 
aware  of  the  gender  bias  that  was  portrayed 
in  this  3rd  edition.  With  rare  exception,  ev- 
ery patient  depicted  in  the  drawings.  c;u-- 
toons,  and  photos  was  male,  whereas  the 


therapists/clinicians  were  typically  female. 
I  do  not  believe  that  the  author  or  publisher 
intended  to  suggest  that  respiratory  care  is 
more  likely  to  be  necessary  for  men  nor  that 
physiotherapists  and  nurses  are  exclusively 
female. 

This  text  was  relatively  free  of  typograph- 
ical errors,  although  an  occasional  editing 
opportunity  was  missed  (eg.  "excercise"  on 
page  44).  I  found  most  illustrations  and  fig- 
ures to  be  helpful  and  well  done.  The  chest 
radiographs  were  particulan'  crisp,  clear,  and 
instructional.  However,  one  illustration  used 
in  all  3  editions  (Fig.  10.6  on  page  9  of  the 
current  edition)  was  confusing.  It  used  the 
tertii  "horizontal  position"  rather  than  "side- 
lying"  or  "supine"  to  explain  the  concept  in 
question. 

I  believe  the  concluding  chapter  (Chap- 
ter 17,  "Evaluation  of  Respiratory  Physio- 
therapy") would  have  best  served  this  text 
as  the  introductory  chapter  instead.  Readers 
would  have  had  "evidenced-based"  seeded 
in  their  thought  process,  up  front. 

Clinical  application  based  on  anatomic 
and  physiologic  principles  is  a  definite 
strength  of  this  text.  Examples  include:  signs 
and  symptoms  of  dehydration  approached 
in  differential  fashion  (page  40);  stratifica- 
tion of  asthma  (page  76);  the  effect  of  po- 
sitioning with  one-sided  pathology  (page 
152);  use  of  a  fan  to  reduce  breathlessness 
(page  174);  and  intracranial  pressure  mon- 
itoring (page  402). 

1  believe  this  book  v\ould  be  a  refreshing 
and  useful  resource  for  students,  educators, 
and  practicing  clinicians  alike,  in  nursing, 
respiratory  therapy,  occupational  therapy, 
and  physical  therapy. 

Dennis  C  Sobush  MA  PT  CCS 

Curative  Care  Network 

Froedtert  Memorial  Lutheran  Hospital 

Department  of  Physical  Therapy 

College  of  Health  Sciences 

Marquette  University 

Milwaukee.  Wisconsin 

Mosby's  Complementary  &  Alternative 
Medicine:  A  Re.search-Based  Approach. 

Lyn  W  Freeinan  PhD  and  G  Frank  Lawlis 
PhD.  St  Louis:  Mosby.  2001.  Hai\l  cover, 
illustrated,  532  pages,  S49. 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


829 


Books.  Films.  Tapes,  &  Soitware 


This  book's  preface  stales.  "A  central 
problem  with  complementary  and  alterna- 
tive medicine  science  in  the  United  States 
has  not  been  its  existence  but  its  accessibil- 
ity. Dr  Freeman's  book  will  help  make  this 
knowledge  available  to  academics  and  pro- 
fessionals who  choose  to  integrate  this  im- 
portant literature  into  health  care  practice." 

This  book  provides  a  \aluable  first  step 
in  what  should  prove  to  be  a  long  line  of 
attempts  to  educate  health  care  practitioners 
and  educators  about  what  has  come  to  be 
known  as  complementary  and  alternative 
medicine. 

The  preface  claims  that  this  text,  "in  its 
entirety,  provides  a  comprehensive  review 
of  complementary  medicine  and  alternative 
therapies  for  health  professionals  at  both  the 
undergraduate  and  graduate  levels."  Clearly 
this  book  is  designed  for  continuing  educa- 
tion of  clinical  practitioners  and  those  within 
the  "business  of  medicine."  The  book's 
stated  intent  is  the  "application  of  critical 
thinking";  it  is  intended  to  clarify  what  we 
know  of  complementary  and  alternative 
medicine  in  relationship  to  our  current  sci- 
entific understandings  and  what  application 
this  might  have  in  health  care  decisions. 

The  book  is  composed  of  5  units  that 
encompass  1 8  chapters.  A  positive  attribute 
of  the  book  is  that  the  reader  can  start  with 
any  of  the  5  units  and  read  it  separately  with- 
out loss  of  integrity  of  the  subject  matter. 
Mind-body  integration  is  discussed  in  Unit 
One,  including  the  physiologic  pathways  of 
communication,  which  include  the  hypotha- 
lainic-pituilary-adrenal  axis,  through  to  a  his- 
tory and  evolution  of  psychoneuroimmunol- 
ogy.  This  section  is  the  most  direct  and 
understandable,  because  it  appears  to  come 
from  the  authors'  expertise  in  this  field. 

Unit  Two  describes  mind-body  interven- 
tions such  as  relaxation,  meditation,  biofeed- 
back, hypnosis,  imagery,  and  pain  control 
therapies.  As  the  textbook  progresses  into 
Unit  Three,  which  describes  the  categories 
of  alternative  medicine,  the  strength  of  the 
organization  begins  to  break  down  because 
of  an  alleinpt  to  describe  the  philosophical 
underpinnings  of  chiropractic,  acupuncture, 
homeopathy,  and  ma.s.sage  therapy  and  their 
proposed  mechanisms  of  intervention.  As  a 
practitioner  of  acupuncture  and  oriental 
medicine  1  was  pleased  with  the  presenta- 
tion of  the  basic  subject  matter  but  noticed 
the  lack  of  emphasis  on  the  organizing  par- 
adigm of  acupuncture  and  oriental  medi- 
cine. Its  philosophical  under|iinnings.  mech- 
anisms of  action  and  intervention,  and 


methods  of  diagnosis  are  of  a  different  model 
and  therefore  access  a  healing  and  recosery 
process  in  a  different  manner. 

Complementary  self-help  strategies  are 
outlined  in  Unit  1-our.  There  is  a  detailed 
section  on  the  history,  pharmacology,  re- 
search, and  clinical  application  of  herbs  as  a 
medical  intervention,  but  this  section  is  de- 
\()id  of  any  discussion  of  traditional  Chi- 
nese herbal  medicine,  which  has  one  of  the 
oldest  pharmacopoeias  as  well  as  an  alter- 
native theory /practice  model.  In  short,  herbs 
are  treated  in  the  same  manner  as  synthe- 
sized medicines:  one  herb  for  one  symp- 
tom, which  is  a  limiting  approach.  Unit  Four 
also  includes  a  section  devoted  to  exercise 
as  an  alternative  therapy. 

The  final  section.  Unit  Five,  details  en- 
ergetics and  spirituality. 

The  organization  of  the  material,  from 
the  chapter  objectives  to  the  critical  think- 
ing and  clinical  application  exercises,  was 
useful  only  from  the  perspective  of  an  un- 
dergraduate student.  Though  the  outline  for 
the  subject  matter  provided  a  framework  to 
detail  the  information,  and  the  exercises  at 
the  end  of  each  chapter  stimulated  learning 
on  a  particular  topic,  if  the  intended  out- 
come is  to  provide  a  resource  and  informa- 
tion ba.se  for  professionals  or  businesses, 
these  wrap-up  sessions  at  the  end  are  not 
useful.  Also,  the  inclusion  of  expert  com- 
mentaries (there  is  one  "An  Expert  Speaks" 
section  in  each  unit)  was  a  weakness  of  the 
book.  More  useful  would  have  been  for  the 
expert  to  be  the  author  of  his  or  her  disci- 
pline's section,  with  information  written 
from  his  or  her  perspective  regarding  the 
healing  abilities  or  the  healing  potential  of 
that  specialty. 

By  attempting  to  be  too  comprehensive 
in  much  too  broad  a  subject  area,  the  book 
is  not  able  to  be  more  than  a  guiding  instru- 
ment for  educators  and  clinicians.  For  a  book 
to  be  complete  with  such  an  aggressive 
agenda  it  would  need  to  be  10  times  this 
book's  size.  The  attempt  to  detail  comple- 
mentary alterative  medicine  as  a  whole  was 
admirable,  but  to  take  an  entire  discipline 
such  as  acupuncture  and  oriental  medicine 
and  attempt  to  summarize  it  along  with  sev- 
eral other  disciplines  that  have  different  the- 
oretical backgrounds  fails  to  show  the  rich- 
ness of  the  healing  modalities  in  any  of  the 
disciplines  described.  Though  it  is  a  diffi- 
cult task  to  combine  all  these  disciplines 
into  a  comprehensive  book,  the  editors  were 
able  to  achieve  their  intended  outcome  of 
making  the  reader  use  nonjudgmental.  clear. 


critical  analysis  of  the  disciplines  described. 
The  section  on  acupuncture  was  convinc- 
ing, and  1  found  only  one  spelling  error. 
However.  1  lack  the  expertise  to  judge  the 
sections  on  the  other  disciplines.  1  would 
say  this  book  is  a  good  first  step  in  an  on- 
going and  needed  process. 

Jim  Blair  CRT  LAC 

Seattle  Acupuncture  Associates 

Center  for  Comprehensive  Care 

Seattle.  Washington 

Pharmacology  in  Respiratory  Care.  Stu- 
art R  Levine  Phami  D  and  Arthur  J  Mc- 
Laughlin Jr  MS  CRT.  New  York:  .McGraw 
Hill  2001.  Hardcover.illustrated.386pages. 
$49.95. 

This  book  is  essentially  an  adaptation  of 
a  text  entitled  Basic  Pluimuiailoi;\:  written 
by  Henry  Hitner  and  Barbara  Nagle,  both 
PhDs  in  phamiacology.  The  rationale  is  to 
provide  respiratory  care  students  a  text  lim- 
ited to  the  information  essential  for  their 
specialty.  A  few  other  chapters  are  included 
to  complete  the  essentials  of  a  comprehen- 
sive text,  but  this  volume,  largelv  outlined, 
can  be  covered  in  the  time  allotted  for  a 
respiratory  care  curriculum. 

The  first  chapter.  "Introduction  to  Phar- 
macology," defines  tenns  essential  to  drug 
description,  specific  objecti\es  of  treatment, 
and  basic  information  on  drug  sources  and 
effects.  A  logical  sequence  of  phannacol- 
ogy  chapters  is  then  presented,  together  with 
a  review  of  the  clinical  applications  essen- 
tial to  respiratory  care. 

Chapter  2.  "Biological  Factors  Affecting 
the  Action  of  Drugs."  describes  the  basic 
principles  of  pharmacokinetics,  defining  the 
temiinology  and  objecti\es  for  the  follow- 
ing chapters  and  describing  drug  forms  and 
routes  of  administration.  The  phamiacoki- 
netic  di\  isions  of  drug  absorption,  distribu- 
tion, metabolism,  and  excretion  are  clearly 
outlined,  with  added  definitions  of  half-life, 
blood  drug  le\els.  bioavailability,  and  fac- 
tors of  indi\  idual  variation.  Other  topics  in- 
clude pediatric  drug  considerations,  drug  in- 
teractions, and  the  terminology  associated 
u  iih  chronic  dnig  use  and  abuse.  Chapter  3, 
"Math  Resiew  and  Dosage  Calculations." 
is  a  continuation  of  general  phannacology. 
introducing  terminology  and  systems  of 
measurement.  Formulas  for  dosage  calcula- 
tions, including  those  for  pediatric  patients, 
are  given.  Since  drugs  are  often  adminis- 


830 


Respiratory  Care  "July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Books,  Films.  Tapes,  &  Sokiwakh 


tered  intra\cnously,  methiids  tor  measuring 
infusion  rates  are  iiutlined. 

Chapter  4.  "Preventing  Medication  Er- 
rors," was  written  by  the  co-editor.  Stuail 
Levine.  It  focuses  on  dmg  terminology,  la- 
behng  of  concentrations  and  other  specifics, 
and  the  abbre\ iations  commonly  employed 
in  drug  orders.  This  emphasis  on  safe  prac- 
tice is  of  p;iramount  importance  to  students. 

Chapter  3  begins  the  description  of  au- 
tonomic drug  therapy.  It  describes  the  basic 
anatomy  of  the  parasympathetic  and  sym- 
pathetic divisions,  with  infomiation  selected 
on  facts  of  clinical  importance.  Comparison 
of  the  di\  isions  is  principally  concerned  with 
the  maintenance  of  homeostasis. 

Chapters  6,  7,  and  8  describe  drugs  pri- 
m;iril\  belonging  to  the  sympathetic,  para- 
sympathetic, and  autonomic  ganglionic  drug 
categories,  with  emphasis  mostly  limited  to 
their  therapeutic  applications.  Adverse  and 
to.xic  effects  are  described,  and  the  scope  of 
the  drugs"  clinical  safety  boundaries  are 
clearly  stated. 

Chapters  9  and  10  describe  peripherally 
acting  drugs,  skeletal  muscle  relaxants,  and 
local  anesthetics.  Although  these  com- 
pounds ;ire  most  often  ordered  by  physi- 
cians, their  administration  is  often  continu- 
ous over  extended  periods,  and  their  adverse 
effects  must  be  recognized  and  reported  by 
respiratory  therapists.  Since  muscle  relax- 
ants are  often  essential  for  controlled  me- 
chanical ventilation,  their  systemic  effects 
must  be  well  defined  and  are  presented  here 
in  detail,  together  with  their  drug  antago- 
nists. There  is  also  a  brief  description  of 
centrally  acting  skeletal  muscle  relaxant 
drugs.  Routes  of  administration  for  local  an- 
esthetics (topically  or  via  injection)  are  out- 
lined, together  w  ith  their  adverse  effects  and 
their  indications  for  clinical  use. 

Chapters  1 1  through  14  describe  drugs 
that  act  principally  on  the  central  nervous 
system.  The  first  of  these  chapters  describes 
brain  function  and  the  physiologic  relations 
of  its  anatomic  divisions,  with  particular  em- 
phasis on  their  roles  in  respiratory  regula- 
tion. Spinal  cord  activities  are  also  briefly 
described. 

Chapter  12  focuses  on  sedative-hypnotic 
drugs  and  ethyl  alcohol. 

Chapter  1.^  describes  general  anesthetic 
drugs.  This  chapter  is  of  particular  value  in 
dealing  with  postoperative  patients.  The  ef- 
fects of  general  anesthetics  on  respiration 
;ire  of  primary  importance,  but  also  their 
profound  effects  on  other  physiologic  sys- 
tems are  brieflv  reviewed.  Both  inhaled  and 


intravenous  agents  are  described,  as  are 
dnigs  iidjunctive  to  general  anesthesia. 

Opioid  aniilgesics  and  antitussives  ;irc  the 
subjects  of  Chapter  14.  S|Tecial  considerations 
in  ivspiraliiiy  carv  are  descrilvd.  such  as  un- 
dcnentilation  ;ind  orthostatic  hypotension. 

Chapters  I  .S  and  1 6  discuss  cardiac  phys- 
iology and  pathology  and  c;irdiac  glycosides 
employed  in  the  treatment  of  congestive 
heart  failure.  Chapter  17  deals  with  com- 
piHuuis  ihal  affect  blood  coagulation,  and 
Chapter  IS  discusses  antiallergics  and  anti- 
histaminics.  Chapter  19  addresses  broncho- 
dilator  drugs  and  the  treatment  of  asthma. 
Investigational  therapies,  such  as  those  in- 
volving monoclonal  antibodies  and  anticy- 
tokines,  are  also  described. 

Adrenal  steroids,  antibacterial  agents,  an- 
tiseptics and  disinfectants,  and  antiviral 
drugs  are  the  subjects  of  Chapters  20  through 
24.  With  the  exception  of  Chapter  23  (a 
discussion  of  herbal  remedies  for  respira- 
tory diseases,  which  was  contributed  by 
Ellen  Feingold).  all  the  chapters  specifically 
describing  drugs  are  drawn  from  the  work 
by  Hinter  and  Nagle. 

Chapter  25  is  a  summary  of  drug  use 
during  mechanical  ventilation.  Written  by 
Viday  Nadkami  and  Stuart  Levine,  it  is  a 
review  adapted  from  the  book  Essentials  of 
Mechanical  Venrilation  by  Dean  Hess  and 
Robert  Kacmarek.  The  final  chapter  (Chap- 
ter 26),  "New  Treatments  in  Respiratory 
Care  Pharmacology."  is  by  Barbara  Nagle 
and  Stuart  Levine.  The  chapter  describes 
surfactants,  nitric  oxide,  and  pentamidine 
isethionate,  and  provides  a  brief  description 
of  the  use  of  inhaled  insulin  for  diabetes 
niellitus. 

Two  appendixes  are  included.  The  first, 
by  Roberto  Palermo  and  Arthur  McLaugh- 
lin Jr,  review  regulatory  issues  in  the  prac- 
tice of  respiratory  care,  particularly  those 
affecting  medical  direction  and  licensure 
acts.  The  second  appendix  is  a  one-page 
compatibility  chart  for  nebulized  respiratory 
medications. 

In  summary,  this  book  takes  a  useful  di- 
dactic approach  to  pharmacology  and  ther- 
apeutics applicable  to  respiratory  care.  Un- 
derstanding the  properties,  uses,  and  dangers 
of  drugs  is  of  obvious  importance  to  the 
indoctrination  of  students.  Virtually  all  re- 
spiratory aspects  of  clinical  practice  dealing 
with  drug  administration  are  discussed.  The 
book  is  well  indexed,  and  subjects  of  not 
only  therapeutic  but  also  medicolegal  im- 


plications can  be  readily  located  and  are 
adei|ualely  covered  in  the  outlined  text. 

Ilunh  S  Mathcwson  MD 

Respiratory  Caic  l^ducalion 
University  of  Kansas 
Kansas  City,  Kansas 

Carbon  Monoxide  Toxicity.  David  G  Pen- 
ney, editor.  Boca  Raton.  Florida:  CRC  Press. 
2000.  Hard  cover,  illustrated.  560  pages, 
$99.95. 

This  is  the  second  book  on  carbon  mon- 
oxide (CO)  poisoning  edited  by  Dr  David 
Penney.  The  first  was  Carbon  Monoxide 
(Boca  Raton,  Florida:  CRC  Press;  1996), 
which  covered  CO  analysis;  formation,  up- 
take, and  elimination  in  humans;  effects  on 
the  heart  and  lungs;  effects  on  development 
in  animals  and  humans;  and  how  CO  can 
impair  learning,  meinory.  neuropsycholog- 
ical function,  and  behavior.  The  first  book 
also  had  a  chapter  dealing  with  delayed  se- 
quelae of  and  possible  mechanisms  of  CO 
poisoning,  as  well  as  treatment  of  CO  poi- 
soning. 

This  new  book.  Carbon  Monoxide  Tox- 
icity, which  complements  the  first  book,  was 
released  in  2000  by  CRC  Press.  Most  of  the 
chapter  contributors  are  different  from  those 
in  the  first  text.  There  are  chapters  regard- 
ing the  history  of  CO  toxicology,  the  dis- 
tribution of  CO  in  various  tissues  and  blood, 
and  health-based  standards  for  ambient  CO 
levels.  There  are  also  chapters  reviewing 
CO  detectors,  the  effects  of  CO  on  exercise 
capacity,  and  the  interacting  effects  of  CO 
exposure  with  concomitant  increased  alti- 
tude exposure.  Carbon  monoxide  can  be 
associated  with  other  toxic  gases,  and  a  chap- 
ter addresses  that  issue.  There  is  a  provoc- 
ative chapter  regarding  the  possibility  that 
CO  may  be  an  unrecognized  cause  of  neur- 
asthenia. A  series  of  chapters  deal  with  the 
management  of  CO  poisoning  in  the  United 
States  and  other  countries.  The  chapter  about 
treatment  of  CO  poisoning  in  the  United 
States  is  written  by  the  same  author  as  the 
similar  chapter  in  the  first  text  and  updates 
that  chapter.  There  is  a  discussion  of  scan- 
ning techniques  to  investigate  brain  damage 
from  CO,  as  well  as  one  on  the  effects  of 
low-level  CO  exposure.  Dr  Penny  contrib- 
uted a  chapter  on  long-term  CO  poisoning, 
and  there  is  a  chapter  regarding  the  Carbon 
Monoxide  Support  Study.  The  final  chap- 
ters deal  with  neuropsychological  evalu- 
ation of  CO-poisoned  patients,  CO  poi- 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


831 


Books.  Films,  Tapus,  &  Software 


soiling  in  children,  CO's  production, 
transport,  and  hazards  in  building  tires, 
and  approaches  to  dealing  with  CO  in  the 
living  environment. 

This  text  is  560  pages  long  and  reviews 
CO  toxicity  in  detail,  but  one  needs  to 
have  both  the  1996  book  and  this  edition 
to  have  a  foundation  for  understanding 
CO  poisoning. 

The  intended  readership  is  broad.  Cer- 
tainly, many  health  care  providers  would 
have  an  interest  in  this  text,  but,  as  well, 
patients  suffering  from  CO-related  sequelae, 
toxicologists,  and  even  historians  might  tlnd 
this  book  infomiati\'e.  Most  of  the  book  is 
written  in  language  that  respiratoi-y  thera- 
pists, nurses,  and  physicians  can  understand. 

As  Dr  Penny  states  in  the  preface,  one  of 
the  book's  purposes  was  to  discuss  topics 
not  covered  by  the  first  book,  and  in  that  he 
has  been  successful.  The  literature  regard- 
ing CO  poisoning  is  lengthy  and  compli- 
cated, but  this  text  successfully  organizes 
the  infomiation  into  a  readable  and  well- 
organized  fomi,  and  each  chapter  is  thor- 
ough and  well  referenced.  The  material  was 
appropriately  selected,  and  most  of  the  data 
and  arguments  posed  are  clear  and  logical. 
Most  of  the  conclusions  posed  by  chapter 
authors  are  convincing,  with  the  possible 
exception  of  the  one  regarding  neurasthe- 
nia's relationship  to  CO  poisoning.  The  text 
is  relatively  easy  to  read,  although  it  is  a 
lengthy  text  and  takes  some  time  to  read  in 
its  entirety. 

Regarding  specific  chapters,  the  first 
chapter  is  somewhat  disorganized,  but  the 
information  presented  is  difficult  to  find 
elsewhere,  so  this  chapter  is  infomiative. 

Chapter  2.  regarding  CO  in  breath,  blood, 
and  tissues,  and  the  measurement,  endoge- 
nous source,  and  biochemical  effects  of  CO 
was  interesting. 

I  found  Chapter  3,  regarding  CO  detec- 
tors and  alarms,  particularly  informative  and 
thought  it  well  worth  reading  by  anyone 
interested  in  the  subject. 

Although  Chapter  4.  which  deals  with 
the  setting  of  health-based  standards  for  am- 
bient CO  and  their  impact  on  atmospheric 
levels,  presents  substantial  detail,  1  did  not 
fnid  this  infomiation  particularly  helpful  as 
applied  to  understanding  threshold  levels  for 
what  should  be  considered  toxic  ambient 
CO  exposures. 

The  chapter  regarding  CO  on  work  and 
exercise  capacity  in  humans  is  informative 
and  very  well  referenced.  The  sentences  are 
somewhat  difficult  to  follow,  but  the  infor- 


mation about  how  CO  affects  exercise  was 
fascinating. 

The  information  about  interactions  be- 
tween altitude  exposure  and  concomitant 
CO  poisoning  was  of  particular  interest  to 
me.  since  I  have  treated  patients  who  suf- 
fered CO  poisoning  while  residing  at 
higher  altitude. 

Chapter  7,  which  deals  with  interactions 
among  CO,  hydrogen  cyanide,  low-oxygen 
hypoxia,  carbon  dioxide,  and  inhaled  iiri- 
tant  gases,  was  stimulated  by  smoke-inha- 
lation victims.  Many  assumptions  would 
have  to  be  made  to  infer  from  such  toxic 
exposures,  which  the  author  reviewed  in  de- 
tail. I  was  unaware  of  this  information  be- 
fore reading  this  text  and  found  this  chapter 
helpful,  although  many  of  the  assumptions 
may  not  necessarily  be  true  with  any  given 
toxic  inhalation.  Nevertheless,  the  chapter 
is  well  thought  out. 

The  review  of  CO  poisoning  and  its  man- 
agement in  the  United  States  underscores 
how  common  CO  poisoning  is  in  this  coun- 
try and  potentially  how  under-recognized  it 
is.  This  information  is  valuable  and  should 
help  raise  awareness  of  CO  exposure  and 
prevention,  which  is  paramount. 

The  discussion  about  death  by  suicide 
(around  the  world)  involving  CO  was  inter- 
esting and  sad.  These  suicide  rates  are  linked 
to  press  events  about  suicide,  and  are  also 
inversely  related  to  improved  emission  stan- 
dards in  automobiles. 

The  chapter  by  Albert  Donnay,  regard- 
ing CO  as  a  recognized  cause  of  neurasthe- 
nia, is  provocative,  although  I  am  not  con- 
vinced that  neurasthenia  is  linked  to  CO 
exposure.  The  neurasthenia  hypothesis  is  in- 
triguing and  may  be  accurate,  but  it  is  dif- 
ficult to  prove  conclusively.  Donnay  made 
reference  to  hand-held  breath  analyzers  that 
can  delect  CO  and  might  be  a  suitable  screen- 
ing method  for  CO  poisoning,  but  those  an- 
alyzers have  not  been  validated  for  that  pur- 
pose, and  the  value  of  hand-held  breath 
analvzers  fordetemiining  CO  poisoning  re- 
mains to  be  detemiined. 

For  this  book  Suzanne  R  While  contrib- 
uted a  comprehensive  update  (to  her  chap- 
ter in  the  first  text.  Carhdii  Moncxidc)  on 
clinical  treatment  of  CO  poisoning.  In  the 
next  few  years,  new  infomiation  might  mod- 
ify current  treatment  recommendations,  par- 
ticularly regarding  the  role  of  hyperbaric 
oxygen  therapy  for  CO  poisoning. 

Discussion  about  CO  poisoning  in  other 
countries  (including  France,  Poland,  the 
United  Kingdom,  and  major  cities  in  China) 


encompasses  the  next  several  chapters.  This 
information  reminds  us  once  again  how 
common  CO  poisoning  is  and  how  it  can 
adversely  affect  health.  IS  Saing  Choi,  who 
is  well  recognized  in  the  field  of  neuroim- 
aging  and  CO  poisoning,  offers  a  chapter 
on  this  subject  and  ihe  role  of  magnetic  res- 
onance imaging  and  single-photon  emission 
computed  tomography.  Dr  Choi  makes  an 
important  point — that  the  prognosis  of  CO 
poisoning  depends  on  cerebral  while  matter 
changes  rather  than  those  of  the  globus  pal- 
lidus — that  challenges  some  physicians' 
point  of  view.  I  agree  with  Dr  Choi  that 
brain  MRI  and  spectroscopy  are  more  sen- 
sitive than  CT  in  detecting  and  evaluating 
brain  damage  due  to  CO  poisoning. 

The  chapters  by  Robert  D  Morris  (low- 
level  CO  and  human  health)  and  Dr  Penny 
(chronic  CO  poisoning!  complement  the 
chapter  by  Alistair  WM  Hay.  Susan  Jaffer. 
and  Debbie  Da\  is,  "Chronic  Ciu'bon  Mon- 
oxide Exposure:  The  Carbon  Monoxide 
Support  Study."  Studies  of  low-level  CO 
exposure  indicate  thai  ambient  CO  levels 
may  have  an  important  adverse  effect  on 
persons  with  underlying  heart  disease.  It  is 
possible  that  sensitive  subpopulations  who 
are  concurrentl\'  exposed  to  other  stress  fac- 
tors, such  as  cold,  may  be  affected  by  CO  at 
concentrations  previously  thought  to  be  safe. 
However,  the  exact  CO  levels  that  can  cause 
disability  in  individual  exposures  remain  un- 
clear. Dr  Penny  offers  a  working  definition 
for  chronic  CO  poisoning,  which  is  "an  ex- 
posure to  CO  that  occurs  more  than  once 
and  lasts  longer  than  24  hours."  He  also 
discusses  the  commonality  of  misdiagnosis 
of  chronic  CO  poisoning.  The  information 
presented  suggests  that  chronic  CO  poi- 
soning could  cause  substantial  morbidity. 
These  points  are  somewhat  substantiated 
by  information  presented  by  the  chronic 
CO  exposure  stiid\.  in  which  question- 
naires were  distributed  lo  patients  follow- 
ing CO  exposures. 

Since  CO  is  common  and  is  associated 
with  pemianent  physical,  cognitive,  emo- 
tional, and  psychological  sequelae,  the  chap- 
ter regarding  neuropsy  chological  evaluation 
of  the  CO-poisoned  palieni  is  timely  and 
helpful.  This  chapter  re\iews  neuropsycho- 
logical testing  and  the  role  of  these  tests  in 
patients  with  CO-related  sequelae.  The  chap- 
ter also  includes  sections  regarding  psycho- 
therapy, psychiatric  interventions,  and  neu- 
rocognitive  rehabilitation,  which  can  be 
potentially  valuable  for  many  patients  suf- 
fering CO  sequelae. 


832 


Respika  roRY  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Books.  Films.  Tapes,  &  Soitw  arh 


It  is  hclpliil  that  Dr  White  provided  a 
chapter  regarding  pediatric  CO  poisoning. 
As  expected,  this  chapter  is  thoroughly  ref- 
erenced. 

There  is  a  chapter  that  deals  with  CO 
transport  and  How  patterns  of  gases  u  ithin 
burning  buildings.  The  final  chapter  dis- 
cusses how  CO  exposure  can  be  dealt  u  ith 
in  the  living  environment.  There  are  niulti- 
ple  possible  sources  of  CO  exposure  all 
around  us.  and  this  chapter  deals  with  those 
sources  and  how  CO  exposure  can  be  min- 
imized. The  section  regarding  investigative 
techniques  for  identifying  CO  sources  is  also 
infonnative.  especially  considering  that  CO 
exposure  is  common  and  may  be  under- 
recognized  and  misdiagnosed. 

Overall,  the  general  appearance  of  the 
book  is  satisfactory.  The  incidence  of  typo- 
graphical errors  is  low.  The  clarity  of  the 
illustrations  is  appropriate.  The  index  is  thor- 
ough, and  1  found  it  relatisely  easy  to  use. 
The  accuracy,  timeliness,  and  coverage  of 
the  references,  by  all  of  the  authors,  are  very 
good. 

It  is  my  opinion  that  this  text  comple- 
ments the  previous  text,  Carbon  Monoxide. 
nicely.  Sections  within  this  text  should  be 
re\iewed  by  physicians  who  see  patients 
with  CO  poisoning  or  its  sequelae.  This  text 
should  also  be  available  to  emergency  de- 
partments, respiratory  therapists  and  nurses, 
and  neuroscientists  \\ho  may  be  seeing  pa- 
tients with  CO  poisoning.  Patients  who  have 
had  CO  poisoning  and  its  associated  se- 
quelae may  also  find  chapters  within  this 
book  helpful. 

Lindell  K  Weaver  MD 

Hyperbaric  Medicine 

Shock  Trauma  Respiratory 

Intensive  Care  Unit 

LDS  Hospital 

Pulmonary  Division 

Department  of  Internal  Medicine 

University  of  Utah  School  of  Medicine 

Salt  Lake  City,  Utah 

Respiratory  Care  Sciences:  \n  Integrated 
.\pproach.  .^rd  edition.  William  V  Wojcie- 
chouski.  .-Xlbany,  New  York:  Delmar  Pub- 
lishers. 2000.  Soft  cover,  illustrated.  656 
pages.  S49.95. 

In  7  chapters  this  book  presents  smdents 
with  much  of  the  basic  science  required  to 
understand  selected  portions  of  algebra, 
chemistry,  mathematics,  microbiology, 
physics,  physiologic  chemistry,  and  statis- 


tics. As  stated  in  the  preface,  one  goal  of  the 
text  is  to  "proxide  respiratory  therapy  stu- 
dents with  basic  science  topics  skewed  to- 
ward respiratory  care  and  cardiorespiraton 
anatomy  and  physiology."  To  a  great  extent 
the  book  fulfills  that  goal. 

The  content  is  most  suitable  for  respira- 
tory care  programs  that  have  an  integrated 
science  course.  In  that  circumstance  any  or 
all  of  the  content  might  be  used.  Schools 
thai  reiiuire  indis  idual  basic  science  courses 
taught  by  different  departments  will  find  this 
book  less  useful.  For  students  who  need  to 
releam  specific  mathematical  operations,  re- 
view in  preparation  for  examinations,  or  find 
clarification  on  certain  basic  science  sub- 
jects, this  book  could  be  quite  useful,  though 
the  utility  of  this  book  will  to  some  extent 
depend  on  what  other  books  are  available, 
since  general  respiratory  care  texts  present 
many  of  the  same  concepts. 

Organizational  components  of  the  book's 
design  include:  a  list  of  formulas  on  the 
inside  Iront  cover  and  the  next  2  pages;  the 
periodic  table  of  elements  on  the  inside  back 
cover;  a  page  of  metric  units,  rules  govern- 
ing logarithms  (Base  10);  a  list  of  common 
mathematical  symbols;  2  appendixes  con- 
taining logarithms  and  statistical  tables;  a 
17-page  glossary;  and  an  8-page  index. 

Each  chapter  is  organized  around  ac- 
cepted education  principles.  The  first  page 
of  each  chapter  begins  either  with  learning 
objectives  organized  according  to  the  chap- 
ter's subsections  or  a  list  of  formulas  fol- 
lowed by  the  learning  objectives  pertaining 
to  that  chapter.  Pro\ided  in  the  appendix  are 
solutions  and  answers  to  chapter  practice 
problems.  At  the  end  of  each  chapter  is  a 
summary  of  the  material  and  a  set  of  chap- 
ter review  questions.  Each  chapter  ends  with 
a  bibliography. 

This  must  have  been  a  challenging  type 
of  book  to  write.  Both  the  breadth  and  depth 
of  detail  are  extensive.  The  need  is  to  pro- 
vide enough  depth  of  material  while  remain- 
ing succinct,  and  this  book  succeeds  quite 
well  in  that  regard.  The  need  to  keep  the 
book  to  a  single-volume  limits  the  amount 
of  explanation  that  can  be  de\oted  to  any 
one  topic,  so  many  students  seeing  this  ma- 
terial for  the  first  time  would  need  addi- 
tional help  to  understand.  The  relevance  of 
the  material  is  enhanced  by  the  consistent 
use  of  examples  drawn  from  health  care 
fields,  and  especially  from  respiratory  care. 

The  text  is  well  edited,  with  few  errors. 

One  potential  stumbling  block  to  success- 
fully solving  calculator-based  problems  that 


use  antilogarithms  stems  from  the  directions 
to  use  the  function  "INV  (inverse)  followed 
by  the  log  key.  An  alternative  solution  should 
be  Micluded  tor  calculators  that  do  not  hav- 
ing that  function  key.  And  possible  confu- 
sion could  be  prevented  by  slating  that  press- 
ing the  INV  key  followed  by  the  log  key  is 
one  way  to  calculate  the  antilogarithm,  or 
that  the  same  operation  can  be  accomplished 
by  using  the  10"  function  key. 

To  illustrate  the  challenge  of  balancing 
depth  of  material  with  succinctness,  con- 
sider that,  in  the  chapter  on  physiologic 
chemistry,  9  organic  functional  groups  are 
presented  on  one  page.  On  the  next  4  pages 
the  stmctural  formulas  for  a  few  monosac- 
charides, disaccharides,  and  polysaccharides 
are  presented.  Additionally  within  those  4 
pages  the  Krebs  cycle,  coenzymes  NAD* 
and  FAD*,  net  number  of  ATP  generated, 
glvcogeni>lysis.  and  gluconeogenesis  are  all 
mentioned  and  explained  to  some  degree. 

Overall,  the  book  fills  an  important  niche. 
For  readers  who  desire  a  brief  introduction 
or  review  of  the  basic  sciences,  this  book 
would  be  a  reasonable  choice. 

Conrad  Colby  PhD 

Respiratory  Care  Department 

College  of  Health  Sciences 

Boise  State  University 

Boise.  Idaho 

Pediatric  Pulmonary  Pearls.  Laura  S  In- 
selman  MD.  (The  Pearl  Senes,  Steven  A 
Sahn  MD  and  John  E  Heffner  MD,  Series 
Editors.)  Philadelphia:  Hanley  &  Belfus. 
2001 .  Sort  co\er.  illustrated.  224  pages.  $45. 

The  Pearls  series  is  a  group  of  13  books. 
edited  by  Steven  A  Sahn  and  John  E  Heff- 
ner, that  covers  a  wide  range  of  subject  mat- 
ter, including  cardiology,  sleep  medicine, 
and  respiratory  care,  and  uses  case  \ignettes 
with  discussion.  This  latest  edition.  Pediat- 
ric Pulmonary  Pearls,  is  the  first  pediatric 
book  in  the  series.  The  book  consists  of  70 
brief  case  \ignettes  derived  from  the  au- 
thor's pediatric  pulmonary  practice  and  that 
span  a  wide  range  of  pediatric  lung  dis- 
eases. Dr  Inselman  is  to  be  congratulated  on 
amassing  such  a  broad  array  of  cases.  The 
writing  style  is  easy  to  read  and  in  general 
is  clear.  Each  case  and  case  discussion  stands 
alone,  so  this  is  the  type  of  book  that  can  be 
hriefiy  read.  The  cases  range  from  congen- 
ital lung  diseases  to  inherited  lung  diseases 
to  infection  to  trauma.  However,  there  is  no 
case  of  a  child  with  asthina,  so  the  patho- 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


833 


Books,  Films,  Tapes,  &  Software 


physiology  and  approach  lo  therapy  of  this 
very  iinpoilanl  iiiiii;  disease  are  omitted. 

Each  case  hegiiis  with  a  hrief  histoi-y  and 
physical  examination,  followed  by  a  list  of 
laboratory  and  other  test  results.  Many  cases 
include  a  chest  radiograph  or  other  radio- 
graphic picture.  A  question  is  then  asked 
about  the  case;  usually  the  question  is  what 
is  the  best  or  most  likely  diagnosis?  A  di- 
agnosis is  then  given,  followed  by  a  discus- 
sion of  the  disease.  Al  the  end  of  each  dis- 
cussion there  is  a  briel  paragraph  on  patient 
therapy  and  follow-up.  This  is  followed  by 
a  list  of  points  that  the  ca.se  illustrates  (clin- 
ical pearls),  then  a  brief  list  of  references. 

One  of  the  strengths  of  this  approach  is 
that  each  case  can  stand  alone.  However. 
this  format  also  presents  a  problem  in  that  it 
lends  itself  to  repetitie)n  and  redundancy. 
For  example.  .-^  ditf'erent  cases  of  cystic  fi- 
brosis are  scattered  through  the  book. 
Though  different  aspects  of  cystic  fibrosis 
are  discussed  in  each  of  the  cases,  several 
elements  are  discussed  in  all  .■*  cases.  Two 
cases  of  tuberculosis  are  discussed,  with  rep- 
etition and  omission.  For  example,  in  case 
2.  a  3.5-year-old  in  day  care  who  is  diag- 
nosed with  tuberculosis,  there  is  no  discus- 
sion of  the  responsibility  of  the  primary  care 
provider  to  search  for  the  adult  with  active 
tuberculosis  nor,  more  importantly,  how  to 
deal  with  the  other  children  in  the  day  care. 
These  are  important  issues  for  primary  care 
providers,  who  frequently  ask  questions 
about  how  they  should  approach  exposure 
in  other  children. 

The  major  problem  with  the  case  vi- 
gnettes, however,  is  the  lack  of  integration 
of  the  case,  the  diagnosis,  and  the  discus- 
sion. In  almost  every  case  the  discussion  of 
the  disease  does  not  represent  a  discussion 
of  the  case  itself  Specifically,  there  is  no 
discussion  of  what  elements  in  the  history. 
physical  examination,  or  laboratory  data  led 
to  the  specific  diagnosis  or  of  other  possible 
diagnoses.  Laboratoi-y  data  not  consistent 
with  the  diagnosis  are  frei|ucnlly  reported, 
but  why  those  data  were  obtained  iuid  tlic  im- 
plications are  rarely  discussed.  Thus,  an  excel- 
lent opportunity  was  missed,  unfoiluiiately.  to 
offer  insight  into  how  to  approach  the  child 
with  a  certiiin  constellation  ot  findings. 

The  book  is  also  replete  with  statements 
that  are  not  quite  or  totally  correct.  For  ex- 
ample, in  case  ?>.  a  9-month-old  with  gas- 
troesophageal reflux  is  described  as  having 
a  hoarse  cry  and  intermittent  stridor,  and  the 
bronchoscopy  reveals  normal  vocal  cords, 
epiglottis,  and  carina  with  bronchomalacia. 


Those  2  observations  are  not  compatible.  In 
this  same  case,  one  of  the  clinical  pearls  is 
suspect.  Dr  Inselman  slates  that  "■Nocuinial 
cough  and  whee/ing  increase  the  likelihood 
of  gastroesophageal  reflux."  That  is  true  only 
in  the  presence  of  abnormal  lower  esopha- 
geal sphincter  tone.  Coughing  itself  does 
not  lead  to  gastroesophageal  reflux  when 
lower  esophageal  sphincter  tone  is  normal. 

In  case  29.  a  child  with  gastroesophageal 
reflux  and  hypothermia,  the  blood  gas  data 
(pH  7.53.  P.,c(,,  24)  are  not  compatible  with 
normal  electrolytes.  There  is  no  explanation 
for  the  hypothennia.  although  the  patient  is 
treated  for  suspected  sepsis.  Again,  there  is 
no  discussion  of  what  else  is  going  on  w  ith 
this  child. 

In  case  26.  a  child  with  cystic  fibrosis, 
the  discussion  states  that  the  chloride  level 
in  the  apical  surface  of  epithelial  cells  is 
decreased.  There  is  in  fact  considerable  un- 
certainty about  the  electrolyte  content  of  the 
apical  epithelial  surface.  There  is  decreased 
chloride  secretion,  hut  whether  the  apical 
surface  of  the  airway  epithelium  is  hypo- 
tonic or  hypertonic  is  not  cleai-. 

In  case  8.  a  child  with  Duchenne's  mus- 
cular dystrophy,  the  discussion  notes  that 
the  maximum  inspiratory  and  expiratory 
pressures  are  abnomial  in  this  disease,  but 
this  patient's  maximum  inspiratory  pressure 
is  -87  cm  HiO.  which  is  within  the  normal 
range.  Thus,  again,  the  discussion  does  not 
agree  with  the  case. 

In  case  38  the  alveolar  air  equation  is 
written  incorrectly,  and  the  discussion  on 
mechanisms  of  hypoxemia  is  confusing. 
Even  the  choice  of  this  case  is  suspect,  as  it 
describes  an  extremely  rare  scenario,  in 
which  a  small  to  moderate  atrial  septal  de- 
fect with  left-to-right  shunt  causes  hypox- 
emia and  pulmonary  hypertension. 

The  case  review  involving  congenital  lo- 
b;u-  emphysema  (case  39)  would  have  ben- 
efited from  a  discussion  of  alveolar  growth 
and  the  potential  effect  of  tlie  timing  of  sur- 
gery on  alveolar  development  and  alveoku' 
number.  Similarly,  case  47.  concerning  bron- 
chopulmonary dysplasia  (BPD).  would  have 
benefited  from  a  discussion  of  tlie  long-lcnn 
sequelae  of  BPD  on  lung  function  and  grow  tli. 

Another  opportunity  was  missed  in  the 
ca.se  study  of  a  child  who  ingested  lamp  oil. 
in  which  the  etiology  of  the  "noisy  breath- 
ing" is  congenital  laryngomalacia.  w  ith  the 
lamp  oil  seen  as  inconsequential. 

In  some  cases  diagnoses  are  made  when 
there  is  no  clinical  history  for  the  di.sca.se.  In 
case  41  (a  child  with  fever,  bibasilar  pneu- 


monia, and  a  hemoglobinopathy)  the  diag- 
nosis is  obstructive  sleep  apnea,  without  a 
history  of  obstructive  sleep  apnea.  In  case 
42,  the  respiratory  syncytial  virus  rapid  an- 
tigen test  is  negative,  but  the  diagnosis  is, 
nevertheless,  respiratory  syncytial  virus.  Un- 
fortunately, the  possible  reason  lor  that  neg- 
ative test  is  not  discussed. 

The  therapies  described  in  the  lollow-up 
sections  occasionally  do  not  follow  the 
pathogenesis  of  the  diseases,  or  in  some 
cases  the  therapies  have  been  shown  lo  be 
ineffective.  For  example,  in  case  47,  a 
patient  who  had  BPD  was  treated  with  a 
mast  cell  inhibitor  therapy,  which  has  been 
shown  to  be  ineffectixe  for  BPD.  This 
case  would  be  misleading  to  a  student  of 
pediatric  lung  disease. 

Pediatric  Pulmonary  Pearls  is  an  at- 
tractive paperback.  The  quality  of  the  chest 
radiograph  reproductions  is  excellent  and. 
in  general,  the  radiographic  abnomialities 
can  be  seen  very  clearly.  Some  of  the  cases 
have  very  old  references,  dating  from  the 
1960s  and  1970s,  whereas  others  are  cur- 
rent. The  index  is  good  and  thus  it  is  easy  to 
find  cross-referenced  cases.  The  text  is 
clearly  written  and  with  minimal  typo- 
graphic and  spelling  errors.  Illustrations  of 
pathology  findings  would  have  enhanced 
some  of  the  cases.  The  book  is  intended  for 
clinicians  at  all  levels  of  training  and  expe- 
rience. It  has  both  common  and  unusual  di- 
agnoses and  thus  will  appeal  both  to  the 
student  and  to  the  specialist.  The  respiratory 
therapist  who  has  an  interest  in  diagnosis  of 
pediatric  lung  disease  will  find  the  case  vi- 
gnettes and  discussion  interesting. 

In  summary.  Pediatric  Pulmonary  Pearls 
will  be  of  interest  to  clinicians.  The  cases 
are  interesting  and  illustrative  of  the  wide 
range  of  pulmonary  diseases  in  children.  De- 
spite some  limitations,  the  broad  strokes  of 
the  discussions  are  good  and  will  serve  as  a 
beginning  place  for  the  student  of  pediatric 
lung  disease. 

Michelle  M  Cloutier  MD 

Asthma  Center 

Connecticut  Children's  Medical  Center 

Department  oi  Pediatncs 

University  of  Connecticut 

Hartford.  Connecticut 

Teaching  in  Your  Office:  .\  Guide  to  In- 
structing Medical  Students  and  Resi- 
dents. Patrick  C  Alguire  MD.  Dawn  E  De- 
Wiit  MD  MSc.  Linda  E  Pinsky  MD.  and 
Gary  SFerenchickMD.  Philadelphia:  Amer- 


834 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Books,  Hums.  Taim.s,  &  Soitware 


ican  College  of  Physicians.   201)1.  Soft- 
cover.  145  pages.  $2.5. 

Il  is  often  said  that  "Those  u  ho  can.  Jo; 
and  those  who  can"t.  leach!"  Ttachin!;  in 
Your  Orfice:  .\  Giiick'  lo  Inslructiiis  Mcd- 
ital  Students  and  Rcsident.s  is  a  timely 
and  very  readable  "how  to"  book  that  would 
make  good  teachers  of  all  of  us  in  the  "can 
do"  category.  It  also  has  something  to  offer 
those  of  us  v\  ho  ha\  e  been  teaching  all  along. 

For  the  first  decade  oi'  m\  career  ni  pri- 
mary care  internal  inedicine  I  practiced  solo, 
and  the  only  teaching  I  did  was  while  on  the 
wards  at  the  hospital.  In  the  past  decade  I 
have  been  teaching  extensively  in  my  urban 
community -based  office.  At  any  gi\en  time 
my  3  associates  and  I  in  some  combination 
deliver  primap,'  care  and  internal  medicine 
c;ire  to  our  patients.  In  doing  so.  we  accom- 
modate 2  post-graduate-year-2  residents  and 
1  medical-school-year-4  student.  The  trick 
is  to  pull  it  off  effectively  using  all  6  of  our 
exam  rooms!  The  trial  and  error  method 
was  employed. 

Over  the  years  our  community-based  teach- 
ing program  has  evolved.  Methods  that  work 
for  some  of  us  do  not  work  as  well  for  others. 
.Some  of  us  ha\e  trainee  presentations  made  to 
us  in  the  hallway,  whereas  others  prefer  to  im- 
prove efficiency  and  have  the  trainee  presen- 
tations made  in  the  exam  room  with  the  pa- 
tient. I  am  not  sure  any  2  of  us  use  similar 
methcxis  to  v\rite  trainee  evaluations. 

As  more  and  more  residents  (and  now 
students  too)  signed  up  for  our  '"Ambulato- 
ry Medicine  Experience."  we  discovered  a 
need  for  a  tbrmal  orientation  policy/proce- 
dure booklet  for  them  to  read  on  their  first 
day.  This  addition  streamlined  orientation 
for  the  trainees  on  a  number  of  issues,  such 
as  charting  and  chart  organization,  office 
note  procedures,  dictation  procedures,  lab- 
oratory requisitions,  phlebotomy,  pulse  oxim- 
etry, electrix-'ardiography.  urinalysis,  skin  bi- 
opsies, vaccinations,  and  health  maintenance 
issues. 

At  month '  s  end.  preceptors  evaluate  train- 
ees and  trainees  evaluate  their  experience. 
Everybody  seems  to  be  happy.  I  can  tell 
that  each  of  the  trainees  has  truly  learned  as 
much  art  as  skill  in  the  month.  1  know  first- 
hand how  sharp  I  feel  that  1  need  to  be 
around  them.  A  re\  iew  of  the  evaluations 
from  both  sides  supports  my  contention  that 
our  method  is  a  resounding  success! 

Given  that  background,  how  skeptical  I 
was  to  undertake  this  book  review.  Would 
the  book  be  an  arcane  dissertation  replete 


with  medical  education  niles  generated  from 
controlled  clinical  trials  about  teaching.' 
Would  il  be  practical  to  gi\e  the  book  lo  an 
attending  physician  who  was  a  novice  al 
community-based  teaching?  Would  the 
book  have  anything  in  it  for  me? 

My  concerns  and  questions  were  all  fa- 
vorably answered.  On  the  one  hand.  I  felt 
vindicated  that  we  had  stumbled  onto  many 
ot  the  good  training  methods  de.scribed  by 
the  authors.  On  the  other  hand.  I  found  there 
were  areas  that  could  be  improxed  in  our 
own  endeavor.  I  don't  believe  that  any  new 
group  who  wishes  to  teach  in  the  office 
should  have  to  reinvent  the  wheel,  as  we 
did;  |usl  read  this  book'  It's  that  simple. 

Teaching  in  \'(>ur  OfTice  is  a  92-page 
soflbound  book  v\ritten  in  very  plain  lan- 
guage, with  very  simple  thoughts,  recom- 
mendations, and  recipes  for  how  to  perform 
the  manv  duties  we  undertake  when  we  com- 
mit to  follow  Hippocrates"  s  Oath  and  teach. 

The  book  is  very  well  written  and  edited, 
and  its  structure  is  simple  and  logical.  A 
short  preface  literally  itemizes  "the  bottom 
line"'  of  each  of  the  book's  8  chapters.  The 
chapters  fall  in  logical  sequence,  as  evi- 
denced by  their  self-explanatory  titles:  Mak- 
ing an  Informed  Decision  about  Precepting: 
The  CuiTiculum;  Getting  Ready  to  Teach: 
Teaching  Skills  and  Organizational  Tech- 
niques for  Office-Based  Teaching;  Case- 
Based  Learning:  Ways  to  Be  More  Effi- 
cient When  Teaching:  Learner  Feedback  and 
Evaluation;  and  Preceptor  Evaluation  and 
Teaching  Improvement. 

Each  chapter  offers  clear  and  concise  rec- 
ommendations concerning  the  issue  at  hand. 
References  to  the  literature  are  appropriate 
and  not  overbearing  in  number.  I  finished 
each  section  with  a  clear  idea  of  how  to  do  it 
right  ;uid  with  a  feeling  that  it  was  feasible  to 
do  it  right  w  ithout  sacrificing  office  efficiency. 

The  book's  organizational  approach  is 
clear  and  complemented  by  Appendix  A, 
which  catalogs  all  of  the  important  infor- 
mation in  the  substance  of  the  chapters  into 
checklists  that  can  be  copied  and  used  on  a 
daily  basis  to  assure  an  excellent  teaching 
environment,  all  the  while  that  good  clinical 
medicine  is  delivered.  There  is  a  "Before 
the  Learner  Arrives""  checklist.  '"Summarv' 
of  the  Learning  Experience"  checklist,  short 
descriptions  of  each  of  the  teaching  models 
proposed,  and  a  I  -page  review  of  the  RIME 
(reporter,  interpreter,  manager,  educator) 
evaluation  method. 

Appendix  B  provides  1-page  tools  that 
prompt  the  preceptor  to  provide  an  excel- 


lent learning  environment  without  disrupt- 
ing normal  clinical  activities  or  revenues. 
These  tools  include  a  checklist  of  clinical 
skills  inventory,  a  learner  contract,  a  sample 
notice  for  the  waiting  room  describing  the 
presence  and  role  of  the  student,  sample 
tools  to  help  the  learner  organize  the  visit. 
sample  presentation  lormats.  an  educational 
prescription  form,  preceptor  evaluation 
form,  and  a  patient  satisfaction  form. 

Some  important  resources  for  the 
would-be  teacher  are  detailed  in  Appendix 
C.  Faculty  development  programs  and  vid- 
eotapes are  described.  There  are  national 
recognitions  and  awards  available  to  those 
who  commit  to  the  regular  practice  of  of- 
fice-based teaching. 

I  must  say  that  the  exercise  of  reviewing 
this  book  has  produced  changes  in  my  own 
teaching  enterprise.  Some  concepts  were  fa- 
miliar to  me.  but  the  existence  and  merits  of 
other  ways  to  teach  was  news.  I  also  bene- 
fited immensely  from  the  very  specific  rec- 
ommendations about  the  evaluation  process. 
Finally.  I  found  very  valuable  the  occasional 
tips  given  in  shaded  areas  throughout  the 
book;  these  sidebars  illustrated  important 
teaching  points  and  gave  examples  of  how 
not  to  interact  with  the  trainee  if  an  optimal 
learning  environment  is  the  goal. 

In  all,  I  recommend  this  book  enthusias- 
tically to  practitit)ners  of  any  specialty  who 
wish  to  teach  medical  students  or  residents 
in  the  outpatient  setting.  Like  everything  else 
in  life,  there  are  right  ways  and  wrong  ways 
to  go  about  the  same  tasks:  this  book  makes 
it  simple  to  do  it  the  right  way.  The  great 
demand  for  community-based  teachers  is 
high  and  increasing.  More  and  more  pro- 
grams me  looking  to  give  their  residents  and 
students  substantial  exposure  to  outpatient 
medicine,  and  there  are  simply  not  enough 
doctors  willing  and  able  to  take  on  the  task. 
These  factors  increase  the  need  for  this  book, 
which  demonstrates  that  teaching  in  your 
office  can  he  done,  can  be  done  well,  and 
can  be  done  in  a  mutuallv  satisfying  way 
w  ithout  disaipting  clinical  activities  and  eco- 
nomic stability.  Everybody  wins! 

Mark  G  Graham  MD 

Jefferson  Medical  Care 

Division  of  Primary  Care  Internal 

Medicine 

Depailmenl  of  Medicine 

Thomas  Jefferson  University 

Philadephia,  Pennsylvania 


Respiratory  Care  •  Ki\  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


835 


Clinical  Supervisor  and 
Staff  Therapist 

Come  join  us  on  heautitul  Whidbey  Island,  located  two 

hours  north  of  Seattle,  WA.  Whidhey  General  Hospital 

IS  a  51-bed  public  district  hospital,  owned  and  operatetl 

the  residents  ot  Whidbey  Island.  The  hospital  is  fully 

accredited  by  the  Joint  Commission  on  Accreditation  ol 

Healthcare  Organizations  and  is  an 

all  licensed  facility. 

We  arc  currently  seeking  two  new 

Respiratory  Care  professionals  to  join  our 

Respiratory  Care  team  —  a  Respiratory 

Care  Clinical  Supervisor  who  is  RRT 

with  proven  experience  providing  direct 

patient  care  and  performing  management 

responsibilities  and  a  Staff  Respiratory 

Therapist  with  ho.spital  experience  {RRT 

preferred).  We  offer  a  competitive  salary 

and  benefits  package. 

Experience  lite  on  Whidbey  Island.  Our  small 
community  is  benefiting  ttom  the  most  advanced  technol- 
ogy and  skilled  professionals.  Together  we  are  making  a  dif- 
ference in  a  place  where  lite  is  different. 


Apply  to; 

Whidbey  General  Hospital 

P.O.  Box  400 

CoupeviUe,  WA  98234 

(360)678-7656x3250 

jobs@whidbeygen.org 

www.whidbeygen.org 

_  Whidbey 

^  General  Hospital 


e^ 


Hejllhcarc  Excellcnci:'  Close  lo  Ho 


Circle  1 23  on  product  information  cord 


RESPIRATORY 
THERAPISTS 

Nationally  recognized  Memorial  Hospital  of  South  Bend, 
Indiana  (90  miles  east  of  Chicago  off  80/90  Toll  Road)  has 
exciting  opportunities  available  for  Certified  or 
Registered  Respiratory  Therapists  who  have  or  are  eligible 
to  hold  an  Indiana  State  License.  New  graduates  are 
welcomed!  Full-time  3rd  shift,  2nd  shift  plus  Per  Diem 
positions  are  available.  We  have  great  areas  to  work 
including  our  upgraded  Trauma  Center,  Adult  Critical 
Care,  Open  Heart  Recovery,  Level  3  NICU,  PICU  and 
general  Med-Surg  areas. 

Please  take  a  moment  now  to  forward  your  resume  via 
e-mail  resume@memorialsb.org  or  mail  to:  Resume  -  RRT, 
Pam  Harris,  Professional  Recruiter,  Memorial  Hospital  and 
Health  System,  Inc.,  702  N.  Michigan  Street,  South  Bend, 
IN  46601.  eoe  m/f/d/v 


Memorial 


Hospital  of  South  Bend' 


Circle  1 24  on  product  information  card 


The  healing  power  of  people. 


o 


It's  about  passion.  It's  about  partnership.  It's  about  people. 

It's  about  building  something  bigger  than  just  a  hospital...  Together. 

Your  working  life  is  an  extension  of  wfio  you  are  -  it's  what  you  love  to  do.  At  Washoe  Health  System,  you'll  encounter  a  compassionate 
family  of  professionals  that  approach  the  art  and  the  science  of  healing  with  the  same  passion.  Washoe's  location  in  Reno/Tahoe,  Nevada 
(recently  voted  the  #1  destination  in  the  U.S.  for  outdoor  recreation  by  Rand  McNally)  is  the  perfect  setting  for  talented  individuals  who  are 
searching  for  the  latest  technology  and  innovations.  Add  affordable  housing,  an  impressive  school  distria,  myriad  entenainment  options  and 
the  rush  of  some  of  the  West's  best  skiing,  and  you'll  soon  discover  why  Washoe  is  an  ideal  complement  to  the  life  you've  always  envisioned. 

Respiratory  Care  Practitioners 
Manager,  Respiratory  Care  Services 

Comprehensive  Relocation  Assistance  Available! 

Washoe  offers  competitive  salaries,  relocation  assistance  and  outstanding  benefits  including  generous  vacation  and  sick  leave,  tuition 
reimbursement  and  on-site  child  care.  The  WHS  main  campus  also  provides  many  amenities  such  as  a  deli  and  restaurant,  dry-cleaning, 
pharmacy  and  fitness  center. 

Please  apply  via  our  website  at  wnivw.washoehealth.com  Fax:  775-982-6387.  EOE  ^t#V 

Washoe  Health  System 

It  siafts  from  the  hejrt 


Circle  1  25  on  product  information  cord 


/ 


__^tiAssoe 


Audio  Cassette  Tapes 

from  the 

47th  International 

Respiratory  Congress 


I  Tape  =  $10  each 

2-5  Tapes  =  $9.50  each 
6  or  More  =  $9  each 


Show  Special... Pick  any  12  tapes  with  free  storage  album  for  $99! 


SATURDAY.  Dec.  I 

J    I .      Kcynolc  Address.  D.  Satcher 

J   5       Trucking  Flow  ot  Residents.  D.N.  Muse 

_1   b.      (6.)  Role  ot  Educators.  E.A.  Becker  & 

(7.)  Role  of  Managers.  K.J.  Steuan  & 

(8.)  Panel  Discussion.  M.Trahand 

□  9.     Errors.  Law  and  RCPs.  A.L.  DeWiti 

Q    10.    Human  Error:  Changing  Our  Perceptions.  J.W.  Salyer 

□  II.    Patient  Abuse  in  the  Home:  What  Is  It  and  What  Are  Your 
Responsibilities'  D.  Roberts 

□  12.    Assessing  the  Right  Competencies  lor  Home  Care  Therapists, 
S.L.  Moreau 

□  13.    Discharging  the  Complex  Pediatric  Patient  to  the  Home.  J. P. 
Stegmaier 

□  14.    Does  Economics  Dri\e  Home  Care  '  R.W.  McCoy 

□  15.    Surfactant  Therapy.  R.J.  Rodriguez 

□  16.    Neonatal  Update:  Inhaled  Nitnc  Oxide  in  the  Neonate.  S.R.  Seidner 

□  17.    Mgt.  Strategies  for  Prevention  of  BPD.  R.J.  Rodriguez 

□  18.    Over\iew  of  Dying  and  End-of-Life  Care  in  America.  PA.  Selecky 
G    19.    Withholding  and  Withdrawing  Ventilation.  R.  ,\ce\edo 

□  20.    Role  of  the  RespiratoA  Therapist  in  Palliative  Care.  H.M.  Sorenson 

□  21.    (21.1  Building  Coalitions.  J. B.  Fink 
(22.)  Reaching  Patients  and  Physicians  with  "Baylor's  Rules  of 
Two"!.  G.E.  Lawrence 

□  23.    (23.)  Regional  Asthma  Center.  L.  Parish-Cooper 
(24.)  Promoting  Public  Awareness:  Successful  Strategies,  S. 
Blonshine 

□  25.    (25.)  Sleep  Disordered  Breathing,  M.B.  Dunning  III 
(26.)  Protocols  for  Standardized  Sleep  Testing,  R.N.  Turner 

Q   27.    (27.)  New  Polysomnoeraph  Technologist  Training  Guidelines, 
R.N.  Turner 
(28.)  Survival  Techniques  for  Shift  Workers.  M.B.  Dunning 

□  31     A.   Issues  &  Trends  in  Allied  Health  Leadership.  M.  Harrington. 
Developing  Your  Career  for  Maximum  Professional 
Effectiveness.  M.  W.  Runge 

Breakout  #1:  Leadership  in  Clinical  Practice.  G.  Gaebler 
Breakout  #3:  Leadership  in  Management.  J.D.  Kimble  (Needs 
overtime  tape) 

□  31     B.   Developing  Professional  Leadership.  R.  Krueger 
Success  Stories,  J.C.  Bolden  .  D.  Johnson 

□  31     C.  #2:  Leadership  in  Clinical  Research.  A. B.  Adams  & 
#4:  Leadership  in  Education.  L.  Van  Scoder 

□  34.    Humor  at  the  Bedside,  M.  Graves 
SUNDAY.  Dec.  2 


□  53.    Selecting  Fiscal  and  Salislaction  Outcomes  in  LTOT.  T.W.  Buck 

□  54.    Measuring  and  Collecting  Outcome  Data,  D.C.  Shelledy 

□  55.    Using  LTOT  Outcome  Data.  R.  Fary 

□  56.    Outcome  Data  Panel  Discussion,  T.W.  Buckley,  R.  Fary,  T.L. 

Petty,  and  D.C.  Shelledy 

□  57.    Smoking  Cessation.  D.D.  Gardner 

□  58.    New  Strategies  for  Treating  Tobacco  Use  and  Dependence,  R.( 

Cohn 

□  59.    How  Respiratory  Care  Managers  Can  Implement  Tobacco 

Education  Programs  for  Community-Wide  Effect,  S.M.  Ciarlarii 

□  60.    Secondhand  Smoke  —  What  Can  Health  Care  Professionals  1) 

About  It?  A.  French.  B.  Hutfman 

□  61.    (61.)  Evolution  and  Rationale  of  the  Low  VT  Protocol.  R.  Brow 

(62.)  Practical  Aspects  of  Implementin'j  the  Low  VT  Protocol, 
Kallet 

□  63.    (63.)  Can  the  ARDS  Network  Protocol  Be  Modified?,  N.R. 

Maclntyre  & 

(64.)  How  and  Why  to  Use  Recruitment  Maneuvers  in  Low  V 

Ventilation.  N.R.  Maclntyre 

□  65.    (65.)  Normal  Mechanisms  of  Airway  Clearance  and  Problems 

from  the  ICU  to  Home.  B.K.  Rubin  & 

(66.)  Positioning  vs.  Postural  Drainage.  J.  Fink  & 

(67.)  Breathing  Maneuvers,  M.  Maclllwaine 

□  68.    (68.)  Positive  Pressure  Techniques  for  Airway  Clearance,  M.J. 

Mahlmeister  & 

(69.)  High  Frequency  Oscillation  of  the  Airway  and  Chest  Wal 

J.  Fink  & 

(70.)  Airway  Clearance  and  the  Artificial  Airways,  R.  Lewis 

□  71.    (71.)  Pharmaceutic  Approach  to  Airway  Clearance.  B.K.  Rubin 

(72.)  Strategies  for  the  Pediatric  Patient.  K.L.  Davidson  & 
(73.)  Airway  Clearance  Strategies  for  the  Vent  Patient  at  Homt 
C.  Lapin 

□  74.    RSV:  Management  and  Treatment  Advances,  CM.  Kercsmar 

□  75.    Test  Your  Skills  on  the  State  of  the  Profession.  M.F.  Traband 

□  76.    How  to  Survive  as  a  Multi-Department  Manager,  S.J.  Price 

□  79.    Technological  Advances  in  Nonin\asive  Respiratory  Monitorii 

G.  Devine 

□  80.    Monitoring  on  the  General  Floor:  What"s  the  Future  Going  To 

Like?  PT.  Sharkey 

□  81.    A  Proposal  for  Evidence-Based  Practice  in  Neonatal 

Resuscitation,  W.D.  Rich 

□  82.    Classifying  Asthma  Patients  through  Symptom  Analysis,  T.J. 

Kallstrom 

□  83.    How  Not  to  Run  a  Respiratory  Care  Service,  K.L.  Shrake 
MONDAY.  Dec.  3 

□  84.    Kittredge  Lecture  —  Mechanical  Ventilation:  How  Did  We  Ge 

Here  and  Where  Are  We  Going?,  R.D.  Branson 

□  85.    Intrapulmonary  Percussive  Ventilation.  C.  Diaz 

□  88.    Exercise  Training:  Are  You  Training  Your  Patients  at  the  Righi 

Exercise  Target?  B.W.  Carlin 

□  89.    Water  Exercise  in  Pulmonary  Rehabilitation  Programs,  M.W.  Mil 
D  90.    The  Impact  of  the  Institute  of  Medicine's  Report  for  Rcspirato 

Care  Providers,  S.P.  Giordano 

□  91.    Evidence-Based  Respiratory  Care,  D.J.  Pierson 

□  92.    Managing  Chronic  Medical  Conditions  in  the  New  Care  Deliv 

Framework,  P.J.  Dunne 

□  93.    (93.)  .Applying  Case  Management  Principles  in  Home  Care,  J.l 

Stegmaier  & 

(94.)  Developing  a  Cost  Model  For  Deli\ery  of  LTOT.  T.W.  Buck 
_l   95.    (95.)  What  I  Wish  All  Home  Care  Therapists  Knew,  B.  Rogers,  i 
(96.)  LTOT  Utilization:  The  Bigger  Picture!  G.  Spratt 

□  97.    (97.)  Modifying  Treatment  Plans  For  the  Aging  Lung,  T.S. 

LeGrand  & 

(98.)  Seeing  Health  Care  through  the  Eyes  of  the  Elderly,  HM 

Sorenson 


□ 

141 

□ 

142 

J 

143 

J 

144 

J 

145 

J 

146 

□ 

147 

□ 

US 

J 

144 

J 

150 

J   49.    (94.1  C;iriii!2  loi  ihc  Oklcr  I'neiinuini;!  Patient,  T.S.  LcGrand  &  _l    140. 

( 100.1  Senior  I'uliimnaiv  Assessment,  H.M.  .Siirenson 
J    101.  Inlerprelalion  of  PlTs  hy  RCPs.  J.O.  NilsesUien 
J    102.  Results  ol  a  National  .Study.  J.M.  Boyle 
J    10.^.  .Agenev  L'pdates  n  riiroui;h  the  eves  of  the  A  ARC,  ARCF, 

CoARC  and  NBRC.  CP.'wie/ali's.  M.T.  Amato.  M.  Weleh  Jr. 

and  J.  Long-Ciodiny 
^    104.  Munehausen  hy  Proxy.  D.  Roherts 

G    105.  Opening  the  Blaek  Bo,\  during  Meehanical  Ventilation.  M.  Amato 
3    107.  ( 107.)  Documenting  Respiratory  Practice  Beyond  the  USA.  J. 

l.ong-Goding  H.I,,  (iar/a  & 

(  10<S.|  Comparison  of  Two  Methods  for  Administration  of 

Inhaled  Salhutamol,  H.I,.  Molina 
J    109. 1 109.)  The  Brazilian  l-.\penence,  L.G.  Ghion  & 

I  1 10.)  The  Inited  Kingdom  K.xperience.  A.  Hynes 
J    111.(111.)  The  Italian  hxperience.  S.  Thompson  & 

(112.)  The  Japanese  Kxperience.  H.  Etchuya 
J    1 13.  ( 1 13.  )The  North  America  Experience.  A.  King  &  □    152. 

(114.)  The  Personal  Experience  —  A  Patient's  View.  B.  Rogers. 

&  Panel  Discussion 
G    115.  Creating  an  Elfecti\e  Multi-Cultural  Work  Environment,  K.L. 

Shrake 

116.  Bronchiolitis  Care  Path.  J.W.  Salyer 

1 1 7.  Pediatric  Asthma:  Success  with  Therapist-Driven  Protocols.  T.R.        □    155. 
Myers 

118.  Developing  a  Pediatric  Consult  Program,  J.W.  Salyer 

1 19.  Lung  Protective  Strategies  for  Status  Asthmaticus.  M.K.  Brown 

120.  Acute  Care  of  the  Adult  Asthmatic.  J.I.  Peters 

121.  Bronehodilator  Resuscitation  in  the  ER.  J.  Fink 

122.  Case  Presentations  of  Pulmonarv  X-Rays.  C.G.  Durbin 
123.(  123.)  PA'  Curves  Should  Be  Routinely  Used  in  Ventilatory 

Management  of  ALI,  K.  Hargett,  R.M.  Kacmarek  & 

(124.)  Heliox  is  the  Front-Line  Treatment  for  Management  of 

Acute  Asthma.  T.R.  Myer.  CM.  Kercsmar 

125.  New  Modes  of  Mechanical  Ventilation  Are  Necessary  for 
Manageinent  of  Patients  w  ith  ARE.  N.R.  Maclntyre.  R.D. 
Branson 

126.  Oxygen  Toxicity  in  the  ICU  Is  a  Myth.  D.J.  Pierson.  C.G.  □    166, 
Durbin  Jr 

131.  An  Answer  to  Respiratory  Care  Re-Engineering.  D.C.  Oberly 

132.  What's  Right  and  What's  Wrong  with  Cardio-Pulmonary 
Exercise  Tests.  M.W.  Millard 

133.  The  Amazing  History  of  Pulmonary  Medicine.  G.W.  Lantz 

134.  New  Uses  for  an  Old  Therapy.  M.K.  Brown 
TUESDAY.  Dec.  4 
3    1 35.  Which  One  for  ARDS.'  M.  Amato 

□  136.  What  It  Is  and  How  You  Can  Help.  R.R.  Eluck 

□  1 37.  Prospective  Payment  Svstem(PPS)  □    173. 

□  1 38.  Models  of  Success  for  RCPs.  K.A.  Cornish 
J    1 39.  Wave  Form  Analysis.  J.O.  Nilsestuen 


□ 

156 

□ 

157 

□ 

158 

□ 

159 

D 

160 

J 

161 

□ 

164 

□ 

165 

a 

167 

□ 

168 

□ 

169 

□ 

170 

□ 

171 

□ 

172 

Diagnostic  Testing:  Pre-  and  Post-Lung  Transplant.  CM.  Foss 

Lung  Transplantation  from  the  Patient's  Perspecti\e.  M.  Pierce 

Apples  to  Apples:  First  Line  Therapy.  S.  Jenkinson 

Safety  of  First  Line  Options.  TA.  Mahr. 

Advantages  of  Combination  Therapy.  J.  Bloom 

.Advances  in  Delivery:  Does  Particle  Size  Matter'.'  TA.  Mahr 

NPPV  Without  Quantifiable  Evidence:  The  Legal  and  Medical 

Ramifications.  PK.  Blakely 

Using  Protocols  in  Respiratory  Home  Care,  G.  Spratt 

Telemedicine  and  the  Hcmie  Care  Respiratorv  Therapist.  P.K. 

Blakely 

Corporate  Compliance  Plan:  What  the  OIG  Is  Really  Saying.  P. 

Dunne 

(  150.1  How  To  Come  L'p  with  a  Good  Research  Question.  C.G. 

Durbin  Jr  & 

(151.)  How  to  Get  a  Research  Project  Done  in  'Vour  Departmen 

J.  Ward 

(152.)  How  to  Write  an  Open  Forum  Abstract  That  Will  Be 

Accepted.  D.J.  Pierson  & 

( 153.)  How  to  Make  an  Effective  Poster  for  Presentation  at  the 

Open  Forum.  D.C.  Shelledy  & 

(154.)  How  to  Prepare  and  Deli\er  an  Eflccti\e  Oral.  Summary 

of  Your  Project,  R.S.  Campbell 

Pulmonary  Hypertension  and  the  Respiratory  Therapist.  R.L. 

Rosenblatt 

Management  of  Amyotrophic  Lateral  Sclerosis.  C.E.  Jackson 

Insight  to  the  Profession.  Panel 

Weaning  from  Mechanical  Ventilation.  N.R.  Maclntyre 

Treatment  of  the  -Adult  Patient  w  ith  Cystic  Fibrosis,  R.L. 

Rosenblatt 

Recent  De\elopments  in  the  Management  of  Meconium 

Aspiration,  R.  Castro 

Critical  Diagnostic  Thinking  for  Respiratorv  Therapists.  DC. 

Shelledy 

Pharmacology  and  Patient  Safety.  J.H.  Eichhorn 

Non-invasive  Monitoring  durins:  Procedural  Sedation.  D.H. 

Walker 

Procedural  Sedation  in  the  ER:  The  Role  of  the  Respiratory 

Therapist.  B.  Krauss. 

Airway  Remodeling:  To  Do  or  Not  To  Do?  N.A.  Hanania 

Neonatal  Critical  Care  Transport.  H.  Heiman 

Neonatal  Transport  Cases.  S.  Segovia 

A&B  (2  Tapes)  .Allergic  Disorders:  The  Child  with  Rhinitis  anc 

Asthma.  B.  Martin 

What's  New  in  CPR  ALS'?  T.A.  Barnes 

Recentralized  Respiratory  Senices:  Ten  Things  We  Learned 

from  Our  Customers.  G.F.  Ellis 

.A  Respiratory  Therapist  Could  Ha\e  Sa\ed  President  George 

Washinalon.  D.J   Pierson 


Terms:  .All  Orders  Pa\ able  in  Ad\ ance  by Cash "V/MC AE Check  (Payable  to  Convention  Education) 

Purchase  Order  (Iticlude  hard  copy  of  PO.  Minimum  purchase  of  S2.5  is  required. 

Credit  Card  Number Exp.  Date 

Your  Name 


Street 
City  _ 
Phone 
Fax 


.State 


Zip . 


Signature 


To  ORDER  Send  this  form  by  MAIL,  FAX  or  PHONE  to: 

CONVENTION  EDUCATION  12685  Prescott  Ave.  -  Tustin.  CA  92782:  Phone  (714)  .505-4600:  Fax  (714)  505-4606 


Show  Special 
Tapes 

Complete  2001  set 
Rush  Charge 


@  SQi^-OO 
@  $ 


@  $995.00 

^  @  $  1 5.00  each 

FedEx  #  or  CC  #  for  Shipping  Charges 
( ) 

Storage  Albums  @  $8  each 

Purchase  Order  Fee  @  .$5 

California  Residents  Add  1.15'/,  Tax 

Shipping  add  S2/Tapc.  Max  SIO  in  USA 

( F-oreign  Add  $3/Tape  Max.  $20) 

TOTAL  DUE 


Selections  &  offer  subject  to  change  without  notice. 
Each  cassette  can  record  up  to  90  minutes  of  program- 
ming. Most  programs  are  less  than  90  minutes. 
L'nexpected  overtime  tapes  are  available  at  $5  ea. 
Defective  merchandise  will  be  replaced  at  no  charge 
for  90  days.  20'*'  restocking  fee  on  returned  merchan- 
dise. Normal  processing  is  w  ithin  5  working  da\s. 
Shipping  not  refundable.  Optional  Rush  Shipping  is 
available  by  providing  your  Fed  EX  or  CC  a/c  number 
in  adilition  to  the  SI 5  rush  charee. 


American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care 

MEMBERSHIP  APPUCATION 


ACTIVE  MEMBER 

An  indivdual  •-  eligible  i*  ne  she  tives  in  the  U.S.  or  its  territories  or  was  on  Active  Member 
pnof  to  moving  outstde  its  borders  or  territories,  ond  meets  ONE  of  the  following  crileno:  (l) 
IS  legolly  creaenlioled  as  o  respiratory  core  professional  if  employed  in  a  state  that 
mcndotes  such,  OR  (2)  is  a  graduote  of  an  accredited  educational  program  in  respiratory 
core   OR  [3)  holds  a  credenfiol  issued  by  the  NBRC 

ASSOCIATE  OR  SPECIAL  MEMBER 

Individuals  who  hold  a  position  related  to  respiratory  care  but  do  not  meet  the  requirements 
of  Active  Member  shall  be  Associate  Members,  They  have  all  the  rights  and  benefits  ol  the 
Association  except  to  hold  office,  vote,  or  serve  as  chair  of  a  standing  committee  The 
following  subclasses  of  Associate  Membership  ore  available  Foreign,  Physician,  ond 
Industrial  (individuals  whose  primary  occupation  is  directly  or  indirectly  devoted  to  the 
manufacture,  sale,  or  distribution  of  respiratory  core  equipment  or  supplies}  Special 
Members  ore  those  not  working  in  o  respirotory  core-reloted  field 

STUDENT  MEMBER 

Individuals  will  be  clossified  as  Student  Members  if  they  meet  all  the  requirements  for 
Associate  Membership  and  are  enrolled  in  an  educational  program  in  respiratory  care 
accredited  by,  or  in  the  process  of  seeking  occreditotion  from,  on  AARC-recognized  agency 

SPECIAL  NOTICE  —  Student  Members  do  not  receive  Continuing  Respiratory  Care 
Education  (CRCE)  transcripts  Upon  completion  of  your  respiratory  core  education, 
continuing  education  credits  may  be  pursued  upon  your  reclassification  to  Active  or 
Associate  Member 


Please  read  the  eligibility  requirements  for  each  of  the  classifications 
above,  then  complete  the  form.  All  information  requested  must  be 
provided,  except  v^here  indicated  as  optional.  See  other  side  for  more 
information  and  fee  schedule.  Please  sign  and  dote  application  on  reverse 
side  and  type  or  print  clearly.  Processing  of  application  takes 
approximately  15  days. 

n  Active 
Associate 

_   Foreign 

D   Physician 

D  Industrial 
n  Special 
a   Student 

Last  Name 


First  Name 


Social  Security  No. 
Home  Address 


Would  you  like  to  receive  our  monthly  newsletter,  AARC  Report, 
by  email? 

u  Yes  D  No 

Have  you  ever  been  or  are  you  currently  in  the  military? 
L     Yes  D   No 

Demographic  Questions  (optional) 

We  request  that  you  ansv/er  these  questions  in  order  to  help  us  design 
services  and  programs  to  meet  your  needs. 

Primary  Job  Responsibility  (check  one  only) 

C  Director  (Technical  or  Program|  L.i   Therapist/Technician 

□  Supervisor  T  1   Medical  Director 

D  Diagnostic  Technologist  1   Student 

D  Instructor/Educator  H   Staff  Nurse 

11  Other,  specify 


Type  of  Business 

__    Educational  Institution 
G  DME/HME 
D   Home  Health  Agency 
D  Hospital/Acute  Core 
n   Other,  specify 


Manufacturer  or  supplier 
Outpatient  Clinic 
I   Physician  office 
D   Skilled  Nursing  Facility 


Check  the  Highest  Degree  Earned 

„   High  School  ,   Bachelor's  Degree 

n   RC  Graduate  Technician  C   Master's  Degree 

D   Associate  Degree  D   Doctorate  Degree 

Number  of  Years  in  Respiratory  Care 

^   0-2  years  ^    11-15  Years 

D   3-5  years  D    16  years  or  more 

n   6-10  years 


Job  Status 


Full  Time 


D   Port  Time 


City. 


Stole 


.Zip 


Phone  No. 


You  are  automatically  assigned  to  a  stole  society  based  on  your  home 
oddress.  If  you  wish  to  be  assigned  to  a  different  state  society,  please 
indicate  v/hich  state  thot  is  here: 

Work  Information: 

Place  of  Employment 

Address 

City 

State Zip  - 


Phone  No 


Preferred  Fox  No.( 

Preferred  Email  Address  _ 
Preferred  mailing  oddress: 


D   Home 


Credentials 

_   RRT 
D  CRT 
D   Physician 
D  CRNA 
D  RN 

Date  of  Birth   


Sex 


D  LVN/LPN 

D  CPFT 

D  RPFT 

D  Perinotal/Pediatric 


FOR  STUDENT  MEMBER  -  REQUIRED 

School/RC  Program 

Address 


City_ 
State 


.Zip 


Phone  No 


Expected  Date  of  Graduation  (required  information) 

Month Year 


American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care  •  11030  Abies  Lane  •  Dallas,  TX  75229-4593  •  [972]  243-2272  •  Fax  [972]  484-2720 


American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care  MEMBERSHiP  APPLtCATtON 


Membership  Fees 

Payment  must  accompany  your  application  to  the  AARC.  Fees  are 
for  12  months.  These  fees  contain  the  $12.50  new  members 
processing  fee.  Renewing  members  (except  students]  can  deduct 
$12.50. 

CHOOSE  ONE  LEVEL  OF  MEMBERSHIP 

AARC  REGULAR  MEMBERSHIP  (Receive  both  AARC  Times  and 
Respiratory  Core  journal) 

□  Active  $102.50 — 

□  Associate  (Industrial  or  Physician)  $102.50 
D  Associate  (Foreign)  $117.50 
D  Special  $102.50 
a  Student  $  50  00 

OR 

AARC  CHOICE  MEMBERSHIP(Choose  one  publication) 

„   Active  $  91.00 

D   Associate  (Industrial  or  Physician)  $  91.00 

D  Associate  (Foreign)  $106.00 

n  Special  $  91.00 

I  want  1_   AARC  Times   L    Respiratory  Care  journal 


OR 

AARC  PLUS  MEMBERSHIP  (All  publications  and  other  items) 

_  Active  $137.50 

D   Associate  (Industrial  or  Physician)  $137.50 

D  Associate  (Foreign)  $177.50 

□  Special  $137.50- 

(Includes  one  free  section  ■  please  mark  choice  below.) 


Specialty  Sections  (optional) 

Established  to  recognize  the  specialty  areas  of  respiratory  core, 
these  sections  publish  a  newsletter  four  times  a  year  that  focuses  on 
issues  of  specific  concern  to  that  specialty.  The  sections  also  design 
the  specialty  programming  at  the  national  AARC  meetings. 


D  Adult  Acute  Core  Section 

n  Education  Section 

D  Perinatal-Pediatric  Section 

n  Diagnostics  Section 

D  Continuing  Care- 
Rehabilitation  Section 

n  Management  Section 

n  Transport  Section 

n  Home  Core  Section 

n  Subacute  Care  Section 


$15.00- 
$20.00 
$15.00 
$15.00 

$15.00 
$20.00 
$15.00 
$15.00 
$15.00- 


PLEASE  SIGN 

I  hereby  apply  for  membership  in  the  American  Associotion  for  Respiralory  Care 
ond  hove  enclosed  my  dues,  If  approved  for  membership  in  the  AARC.  I  will 
obide  by  its  bylaws  and  professional  code  of  ethics  I  authorize  investigation  of 
ail  statements  contained  herein  ond  understand  thot  misrepresentolions  or 
omissions  of  focts  colled  for  is  cause  for  rejection  or  expulsion. 

A  yearly  subscription  to  RESPIRATORY  Care  journal  ond  AARC  Times  magazine 
includes  on  ollocotlon  of  $1 1 ,50  from  my  dues  for  each  of  these  publicotions 

NOTE  Contributions  or  gifls  to  the  AARC  are  not  tax  deductible  as  charitable 
contributions  for  income  tax  purposes-  However,  they  may  be  tax  deductible  as 
ordinary  and  necessary  business  expenses  subject  to  restrictions  imposed  as  a 
result  of  association  lobbying  activities.  The  AARC  estimates  that  the 
nondeductible  portion  of  your  dues  —  the  porlion  which  is  allocable  to  lobbying 
~  is  26% 


Signature 
Date 


TOTAL  MEMBERSHIP  FEE  $_ 


TOTAL  SECTION  FEE         $_ 


GRAND  TOTAL  =  Membership  Fee 

plus  optional  sections 


"   Total  Amount  Enclosed  $ 

Please  charge  my 

dues  (see 

below) 

To  charge  your  dues, 

complete 

the 

following: 

Lj   MasterCard 

D  Visa 

Card  Number 

Card  Expires 

/ 

Sianature 

Mail  application  and  appropriate  fees  to: 
American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care  •  11030  Abies  Lane  «  Dqllos,  TX  75229-4593  •  [972]  243-2272 


Fax  [972]  484-2720 


2 


RE/PIRATORy  QVRE 


Manuscript  Preparation  Guide 


Respirator'V'  Carh  welcomes  original  manuscripts  related  to  the  sci- 
ence ;ind  technology  ot'a'spiratoiy  care  and  prep;ired  according  to  the 
follow  ing  instnictioiis  and  the  Vnitonu  Rciiiiiiviiwnis  for  Miiini.scripls 
Siihniirtcil III BiomediciilJoiiniais (available at  lntp://\\\\w:iciiiji'.orii/ 
imkx.htinl).  Manuscripts  are  blinded  and  reviewed  by  profession- 
als with  experience  in  the  subject  of  the  paper.  Authors  are  respon- 
sible for  obtaining  written  peniiission  from  the  original  copsrlghl  liold- 
er  to  use  pre\  lousl)  published  figures  and  tables.  Before  publication. 
authors  receive  page  proofs  and  are  allow  ed  to  make  only  minor  cor- 
rections. Accepted  manuscripts  are  copy-edited  for  cUuily.  concision. 
and  consistency  with  RH.SPIR.ator^  Care's  format.  Published 
papers  are  copyrighted  by  Daedalus  Inc  and  may  not  be  published  else- 
where  w  ithout  pemiission.  Editorial  consultation  is  available  at  any 
stage  of  planning  or  writing:  contact  the  Editorial  Office.  600  Ninth 
Avenue,  Suite  702.  Seattle  WA  98104.  (206)  22.V()558.  fax  (206) 
223-0563.  E-mail:  rcjoumal(§^aarc.org 

Categories  of  Articles 

Research  Article:  A  report  of  an  onginal  investigation  (a  study).  Must 
include:  Title  Page.  .Abstract.  Key  Words.  Introduction,  Methods. 
Results.  Discussion.  Conclusions,  and  References.  May  also  include: 
Tables.  Figures  (if  so.  must  include  Figure  Legends).  Acknowledg- 
ments, and  Appendixes. 

Review:  A  comprehensive,  critical  review  of  the  literature  and  state- 
of-the-art  summary  of  a  topic  that  has  been  the  subject  of  at  least  40 
published  research  articles.  Must  include:  Title  Page.  Outline. 
Abstract.  Key  Words.  Introduction.  Review  of  the  Literature.  Sum- 
mary, and  References.  May  also  include:  Tables.  Figures  (if  so.  must 
include  Figure  Legends).  Acknowledgments,  and  Appendixes. 

Overview:  A  critical  review  of  a  pertinent  topic  that  has  fewer  than 
40  published  research  articles.  Same  structure  as  Re\  iew  Article. 

Update:  A  report  of  subsequent  developmenls  in  atopic  that  has  been 
critically  reviewed  in  RESPIR.'XTOR'i  C.\RE  or  elsew  here.  Same  struc- 
ture as  a  Review  Article, 

Special  .\rticle:  A  pertinent  paper  not  fitting  one  of  the  other  cate- 
gories. Consult  w ith  the  Editor  before  writing  or  submitting  such  a 
paper. 

Editorial:  ,\  paper  addressing  an  issue  in  the  practice  or  administration 
of  respiratory  care.  It  may  present  an  opposing  opinion,  clarify  a  posi- 
tion, or  bring  a  problem  into  focus. 

Letter:  A  brief,  signed  communication  responding  to  an  item  pub- 
lished in  Respir.atory  Care  or  about  other  pertinent  topics. 
Tables.  Figures,  and  References  may  be  included.  The  letter  should 
be  marked  "For  Publication." 


Case  Report:  Report  of  an  uncommon  clinical  case  or  a  new  or 
impnned  method  of  m;magement  or  treatment.  A  case-m;uiaging  physi- 
ci;m  must  either  be  ;m  author  or  furnish  a  letter  apprin  ing  the  m;uiiiscript. 
Must  include:  Title  Page,  Abstract,  Key  Words.  Introduction,  Case 
Sumniiuy,  Discussion,  and  References.  May  also  include:  Tables,  Fig- 
ures (if  so,  must  include  Figure  Legends),  and  .Acknowledgments, 

P()int-of-Vie\v:  A  paper  expressing  personal  but  substantiated  opinions 
on  a  pertinent  topic.  Must  include:  Title  Page,  Text,  and  References.  May 
also  include:  Tables  and  Figures  (if  so,  must  include  Figure  Legends), 

Drug  Capsule:  A  miniature  re\  iew  pa[X"r  abotit  a  dnig  or  class  of  dmgs. 
Drtig  Capsules  address  pharmacology,  ph;iniiacokinetics,  and/or  phar- 
macotherapy. 

(iraphics  Comer:  A  brief,  insuuctive  case  report  discussing  and  illus- 
trating waveforms  for  monitoring  or  diagnosis.  Must  include:  Ques- 
tions, Answers,  and  Discussion, 

PFT  Corner:  A  brief,  instniclive  case  report  arising  from  pulmonary 
function  testing,  accompanied  by  a  review  of  the  relevant  physiolo- 
gy and  appropriate  references  to  the  literature.  Must  include:  Ques- 
tions, Answers,  and  Discussion. 

Test  Your  Radiologic  Skill:  A  brief,  instructive  case  report  pertinent 
to  respiratory  c;ire  ;uid  in\ol\  ing  imaging,  including  one  or  more  radio- 
graphs or  other  images  submitted  as  black  and  w  liile  glossy  photographs 
that  clearly  illustrate  the  teaching  points  being  made.  Must  include: 
Questions.  Answers,  and  Discussion. 

Preparing  the  Manuscript 

Double-space  the  text  and  number  the  pages.  Do  not  include  author 
names,  author  institutional  aftlliations,  or  allusions  to  institutional  affil- 
iations anywhere  except  on  the  title  page.  On  the  Abstract  page  include 
the  title  but  do  not  include  author  names.  Begin  each  of  the  follow- 
ing on  a  new  page:  Title  Page,  Abstract,  Text.  Acknowledgments.  Ref- 
erences, each  Table,  each  Figure,  and  each  Appendix.  Use  standard 
English  in  the  first  person  and  active  voice.  Type  all  headings  in  ini- 
tial-capital letters  (eg.  Introduction,  Methods,  Patients,  Equipment, 
Statistical  Analysis,  Results,  Discussion).  Center  the  main  section  head- 
ings and  place  second-level  headings  on  the  left  margin. 

.Abstract.  Please  ensure  that  the  abstract  does  not  contain  any  facts 
or  conclusions  that  do  not  also  appear  in  the  Nxly  text.  Limit  the  abstract 
to  no  more  than  2.50  words. 

Key  Words.  Include  a  list  ol  6  to  10  ke>  words  or  key  phrases  in 
Research  Articles,  Reviews.  Overviews.  Special  Articles,  and  Case 
Reports.  Key  words  are  best  selectetl  from  the  Meilical  Subject  Head- 
ings (MeSH  )  used  by  MEDLINF)  and  available  at  lmp://w\\\\.nlm.iuh. 
f;or/iiu'.sh/iiU'slih<itiu\liliiil. 


RESPIRATOR"!  Cari;  Manuscript  Preparation  Guide.  Revised  4/01 


Manuscript  Preparation  Guide 


References.  Assign  rdciviicc  luiiiibcis  in  the  order  thai  articles  are 
eited  in  voiir  nianiiscript.  At  tlie  end  ol  the  manuscript,  hst  the  cited 
works  in  niimeiical  t)rder.  Ahbre\  iale  jouniai  names  as  in  Index  Medi- 
ciis.  List  all  authors.  It'tlie  rese;irch  has  not  set  been  accepted  for  pub- 
lication, ciie  the  research  as  a  personal  communication  (eg. 
.Smith  KR.  personal  communication.  20()l ):  however,  you  must  obtain 
written  pennission  from  the  author  to  rite  his  or  her  impiMislied  data. 
Do  not  number  such  references;  instead,  make  parenthetical  reference 
in  the  bod>'  text  of  your  manuscript.  Example:  "Recently,  Jones  et  al 
found  this  tfeatment  effective  in  45  of  83  patients  (Jones  HI.  personal 
communication.  2000)."" 


Corporate  author  book: 

.American  Medical  Association  Department  of  Drugs.  AMA 
drug  evaluations.  3rded.  Littleton  CO:  Publishing  Sciences 
Group;  1477. 

Chapter  in  book  with  editor(s): 

IsonoS.  Upper  airway  muscle  function  during  sleep.  In:  L<iugh- 
lin  GM.  Carroll  JL.  Marcus  CL.  editors.  Sleep  and  breathing  in 
children:  a  de\elopmental  approach.  (Lung  Biology  in  Health  and 
Disease.  Vol  147.  Claude  Lenfant,  Executive  Editor.)  New 
York/Basel:  Marcel  Dekker;  2000:26 1-291. 


The  following  examples  show  RKSPIRATORY  Care's  style 
for  references. 

Paper  accepted  but  not  yet  published: 

Hess  D.  New  therapies  for  asthma.  Respir  Care  (year,  in  press). 

Article  in  a  journal  carrying  pagination  throughout  the  volume: 
Legere  BM,  Kavuru  MS.     Pulmonary  function  in  obesity. 
Respir  Care  2000;45(8);967-968. 

Article  in  a  publication  that  numbeis  each  issue  beginning  with  Page  1 : 
Kallstrom  TJ.  Focus  on  asthma — disea,se  management:  a  role  for 
the  respiratory  therapist.  AARCTimes  I999;2.3(Oct):16,  17,  19. 

Corporate  author  journal  article: 

American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care.  Clinical  Practice 
Guideline.  Removal  of  the  endotracheal  tube.  Respir  Care 
1999.44(1  ):8.S-90. 

Article  in  journal  supplement:  (Journals  differ  in  numbering  and  iden- 
tify ing  supplements.  Supply  infoniiation  sufficient  to  allow  retrieval.) 
Barnes  PJ.  Endogenous  inhibitory  mechanisms  in  asthma.    Am 
J  Respir  Crit  Care  Med  2()()();  161(3  Pt  2):S176-S181. 

Abstract  in  journal:  (Abstracts  citations  are  to  be  avoided,  and  those 

more  than  3  years  old  should  not  be  cited.) 

Volsko  TA,  De  Fiore  J.  Chatbum  RL.  Acapella  vs  flutter:  per- 
formance comparison  (abstract).  Respir  Care  2000;45(8):99l. 


World  Wide  Web 

American  Lung  Association.  Trends  in  pneumonia,  influenza,  and 
acute  respiratory  conditions  mortality  and  morbidity.  Febiii;ir\;  2(XX). 
http://www.lungusa.org/data.  Accessed  November  20.  2()()0. 

Tables.  Tables  should  be  consecutix  ely  numbered.  At  the  bottom 
of  the  table  define  and/or  explain  all  abbre\  iations  and  symbols  used 
in  the  table.  For  footnotes  use  the  follow  ing  symbols,  superscnpted, 
in  the  table  body,  in  the  following  order:  *.  t.  %.  §.  ||.  %  **.  tt.  If 
data  include  a  ■"±"  value,  please  indicate  whether  the  \  alue  is  a  stan- 
dard deviation  or  standard  error  of  the  mean. 

Figures  (illustrations).  Figures  include  graphs,  line  drawings,  pho- 
tographs, and  radiographs.  .Ml  figures  should  be  sharp  black-and- 
white  images  and  be  camera-ready.  Glossy  prints  are  preferred,  but 
a  good  la.ser  print  will  do.  Use  only  illustrations  that  elaiify  and  aug- 
ment the  text.  Radiographs  should  clearly  illustrate  the  point  being 
made  ;ind  should  be  submitted  a.s  black-and-white  glossy  photographs. 
If  color  is  essential  to  the  figure,  consult  the  Editorial  Office  for 
more  information.  In  reports  of  animal  experiments,  use  schemat- 
ic drawings,  not  photographs.  A  letter  of  consent  must  accompa- 
ny any  photograph  of  an  identifiable  person.  Number  figures  con- 
secutively as  Figure  1 .  Figure  2.  etc.  All  the  figures  must  be  mentioned 
in  the  text.  Every  figure  must  have  a  legend  (a  title  and/or  descrip- 
tion explaining  the  figure).  Figure  legends  should  appear  as  sep- 
arate paragraphs  at  the  end  of  the  manuscript  (after  the  References 
section),  in  the  same  computer  file  as  the  manuscript  (not  in  a  sep- 
arate file,  as  with  the  tables  and  figures). 


Editorial  in  a  journal: 

Giordano  SP.     What's  that  sound?  (editiirial)  Respir  Care 
2000;45(10):1 167-1 168. 

Editorial  with  no  author  given: 

The  perils  of  paediatric   research   (editorial).   Lancet 
1999;353(9I34):685. 

Letter  in  journal: 

Piper  SD.  Testing  conditions  for  nebulizers  (letter).  Respir  Care 
2000;45(8):971. 

Book:  (For  any  book,  specific  pages  should  be  cited  w  hene\'er  ref- 
erence is  made  to  specific  statements  or  other  content. ) 

Cairo  JM.  Pilbeam  SP.  Mosby's  respiratory  care  equipment.  6th 

ed.  St  Louis:  Mosbv;  1999:76-8.3. 


Do  not  create  scanned  sersions  of  figures  borrowed  fn)m  other  pub- 
lications; clear  photocopies  are  preferable.  To  include  figures  pre- 
\  iously  published  in  other  publications  you  must  obtain  pennission 
from  the  original  copyright  holder.  Figures  must  be  of  professional 
quality  and  a  copy  of  the  article  from  w  hich  the  figure  came  should 
be  available. 

Drugs.  Precisely  identify  all  drugs  and  chemicals  used,  giving  gener- 
ic (nonproprietary)  names,  doses,  and  methods  of  administration. 
Brand  or  trade  names  may  be  given  in  parentheses  after  generic 

names. 

Commercial  Products.  In  the  text,  parenthetically  identity  com- 
mercial products  only  on  tlrst  mention.  gi\  ing  the  maiiufaclurcr"s 
name  and  location.  Example:  "We  pert'onned  spirometn  ( 108.3  Sys- 
tem. Medical  Graphics.  Minneapolis.  Minnesota!"  Punide  model 


Respir AlOR'i  C.\RH  Manuscript  Preparation  (juide.  Revised  4/01 


Manuscript  prkpakation  Guidi- 


numbers  il  aNailahlc.  and  rnaiuitai-'tiirci'N  sLiggcstcd  piui.-  illlic  sluils 
has  CDM  implications. 

Permissions:  You  nnisl  ohiani  wriucn  permission  lo  use  pieliires 
of  idenliriable  indi\  idiials  or  lo  name  indi\  idnals  in  llie  Aekiiow  I- 
edgnienls  section,  ^'ou  must  obtain  written  permission  Ironi  llie 
original  copyright  holder  to  use  figures  or  tables  from  other  pub- 
lications. Copies  of  all  applicable  permissions  must  be  on  file  at 
RliSPIR.MOR^'  C.\Kh  before  a  manuscript  goes  to  press.  Copyright 
is  most  often  held  by  the  Journal  or  book  in  which  the  figure  or  table 
originally  appeared  and  applies  to  the  creativity,  style,  and  form 
in  which  the  facts/data  are  presented  lo  the  reader:  the  facts  ihcm- 
sehes  are  not  copyiight-proleclahle.  Therefore,  pennission  is  required 
to  reproduce  a  table  or  figure  directly,  or  with  minor  adaptations, 
from  a  journal  or  book,  but  permission  is  not  re(.|uired  il  data  are 
extracted  and  presented  in  a  nev\  fomiat.  In  that  case,  cite  the  source 
of  the  data  as  in  the  following  example:  "Adapted  trom  Reference 
23." 

Ethics.  When  reporting  experiments  on  human  subjects,  indicate  that 
procedures  were  conducted  in  accordance  with  the  ethical  standards 
of  the  World  Meiticcil  Association  Declaration  oJHelsinkHsee  Respir 
Care  1997:42(6):635-636:  also  available  at  http.V/www.wina.net/e/ 
J7-c_einn-(i\irapliniinilH'rini;. html)  or  of  ihe  institution's  committee 
on  human  experimentation.  State  that  informed  consent  was 
obtained.  Do  not  use  patients"  names,  initials,  or  hospital  numbers  in 
text  or  illustrations.  When  reporting  experiments  on  animals,  indicate 
that  the  institution's  policy,  a  national  guideline,  or  a  law  on  the  care 
and  use  of  laboratory  animals  was  followed. 

Statistics.  Identify  the  statistical  tests  used  in  analyzing  the  data  and 
give  the  prospectively  detemiined  level  of  significance  in  the  Meth- 
ods section.  Report  p  v  alues  in  tlie  Results  section.  Cite  only  textbook 
and  published  article  references  to  support  choices  of  tests.  Paren- 
theticallv  identify  any  computer  programs  used.  If  data  include  a  "±" 
value,  plea.se  indicate  w  hether  the  value  is  a  standard  deviation  or  stan- 
dard error  of  the  mean. 

Units  of  Measurement.  Express  all  measurements  in  SI  (Systcnic  Inter- 
nationak')  units  (units  and  conversion  factors  listed  at  Respir  Care 
1997:42(61:640  and  also  available  at  hllpr/Avww.rcjoiinuil.coni/ 
aiithor_i'iiiiU'/.  Show  gas  pressures  (including  blood  gas  tensions)  in 
millimeters  of  mercury  (mm  Hg). 

Conflict  of  Intere.st.  On  the  cover  page,  authors  must  disclose  any 
liaison  or  financial  arrangement  they  have  with  a  manufacturer  or 
distributor  who.se  product  is  addressed  in  the  manuscript  or  with  the 
manufacturer  or  distributor  of  a  competing  product.  Such  arrange- 
ments do  not  disqualify  a  paper  from  consideration  and  are  not  dis- 
closed to  reviewers.  Reviewers  iire  screened  for  possible  contlict  of 
interest. 

Abbreviations  and  Symbols.  Use  the  standard  abhre\  iations  and 
symbols  listed  at  Respir  Care  l997:42(6):637-642  (also  available 
at  http://www.rcjoiirnal.coni/aiitlior_guide/).  Do  not  create  new 
abbreviations.  Do  not  use  abbreviations  in  the  title  or  section  head- 
inas  and  do  not  use  unusual  abbreviations  in  the  abstract.  LIse  an 


abbrcN  iaiion  onl\  il  llie  lei  in  occurs  4  or  more  limes  in  the  paper. 
Parentheticallv  define  all  abbre\  iaiions:  write  out  the  lull  term  on 
first  mention,  followed  by  the  abbreviation  in  parentheses. 
Example:  chronic  obstructive  pulmonary  disease  (COPD).  There- 
after use  only  the  abbreviation.  Standard  units  of  measurement  and 
scientific  terms  can  be  abbre\  ialed  w  ithoul  explanation  (eg.  L/min. 
mm  Hg.  pll.  ():). 

Please  use  the  lollowing  forms;  cm  If  ()  (not  cmll2()l.  f  (iiol  bpm). 
f  (not  1 1.  L/min  (not  I.PM.  l/min.  or  1pm).  ml.  (not  ml),  mm  Hg  (not 
inmllg).  pH  (not  Ph  or  Pll).  p  >  0.0(11  (not  p>().()()l ).  s  (not  sec).  .Spcj: 
(arterial  oxygen  saturation  measured  via  pulse-oximelry). 

Prior  and  Duplicate  Publication.  In  general,  do  not  submit  work  that 
has  been  published  or  accepted  elsewhere,  though  in  special 
instances  the  Editor  may  consider  such  material  if  the  original  pub- 
lisher grants  permission.  Please  consult  the  Editor  before  submitting 
such  work. 

Authorship.  All  persons  listed  as  authors  must  have  participated  in 
the  reported  work  and  in  the  shaping  ol  the  manuscript,  all  must  have 
proofread  the  submitted  manuscript,  and  all  should  be  able  to  pub- 
licly discuss  and  defend  tlie  paper's  content.  A  paper  of  corporate  author- 
ship must  specify  the  key  persons  responsible  for  the  article.  Attri- 
bution of  authorship  is  not  based  .solely  on  solicitation  of  funding, 
collection  or  analysis  of  data,  provision  of  advice,  or  similar  sen  ices. 
Persons  who  provide  such  ancillai^  services  may  be  recognized  in  an 
Acknowledgments  section,  but  written  pennission  is  required  from 
the  persons  acknowledged. 

Reviewers:  Please  supply  the  names,  credentials,  affiliations,  address- 
es, and  phone/fax  numbers  of  3  professionals  w  hom  you  consider  expert 
on  the  topic  of  your  paper.  Your  manuscript  may  be  sent  to  one  or 
more  of  them  for  blind  peer  review. 

Submitting  the  Manuscript 

Submit  3  printed  copies  and  one  (3..'>-inch)  computer  diskette.  The 
printed  copies  should  each  include  photocopies  of  all  of  the  Figures. 
Tables,  and  Appendixes.  On  the  diskette,  the  manuscript  .should  be 
in  one  file  and  the  tables  in  a  separate  file.  If  soft  copies  of  the  fig- 
ures are  available,  they  should  also  be  in  a  separate  file.  However,  do 
not  create  .^canned  versions  of  figures  borrowedfroin  other  publicatiotis: 
clear  photocopies  are  preferable.  Include  the  completed  Cover  Let- 
ter and  Checklist  (see  next  page)  and  permission  letters.  Mail  to  Res- 
PIR.ATORY  C.ARi;.  600  Ninth  A\enue.  Suite  702.  SeaUle  WA  98104. 
Do  not  fax  manuscripts.  Receipt  will  be  acknowledged. 

Rkspirat()r\  Care 
Editorial  Office: 

600  Ninth  Avenue.  Suite  702 
Seattle  WA  98 104 

(206)  223-0558  (voice) 

(206)  223-0563  (fax) 

rcJDurnulfc'aarc.org 


RESPIR,-\T0RY  C.AR1-:  Manuscript  Preparation  Guide.  Revised  4/01 


Cover  Letter  &  Checklist 

A  copy  of  this  completed  form  must  accompany  all  manuscripts  submitted  for  publication. 


Title  of  Paper: 

Publication  Category: 


Corresponding  Autfior; Pfnone: FAX;. 

Mailing  Address: 

Reprints:      QYes     □  No  E-mail  Address: 


"We,  the  undersigned,  have  all  participated  in  the  work  reported,  proofread  the  accompanying  manuscript,  and  approve  its  sub- 
mission for  publication."  Please  print  and  include  credentials,  title,  institution,  academic  appointments,  city  and  state.  If  more 
than  4  authors,  please  use  another  copy  of  this  form.' 

'First  Author: 


Author  Signature/Date, 


•Second  Author: 


'Third  Author: 


Author  Signature/Date. 


Author  Signature/Date. 


'Fourth  Author: 


Author  Signature/Date, 


Has  this  research  been  presented  in  any  public  forum?        □  Yes     □  No 
If  yes,  where,  when  and  by  whom? 


Has  this  research  received  any  awards?         □  Yes     □  No 
If  yes,  please  describe. 


Has  this  research  received  any  grants  or  other  support,  financial  or  material?       □  Yes     □  No 
If  yes,  please  describe. 


Do  any  of  the  authors  of  this  manuscript  have  a  financial  interest  in  (or  a  commercial  or  consulting  relationship  to)  any  of  the 
products  or  manufacturers  mentioned  in  this  paper  or  any  competing  products  or  manufacturers?        □  Yes     □  No 


■  yes,  please  describe. 


Have  you  enclosed  a  copy  of  the  manuscript  on  diskette? 

Is  double-spacing  used  throughout  entire  manuscript? 

Are  all  pages  numbered  in  upper-right  corners? 

Are  all  references,  figures,  and  tables  cited  in  the  text? 

Has  the  accuracy  of  the  references  been  checked,  and  are  they  correctly  formatted? 

Have  SI  values  been  provided? 

Has  all  ahthmetic  been  checked? 

Have  generic  names  of  drugs  been  provided? 

Have  necessary  written  permissions  been  provided? 

Have  authors'  names  been  omitted  from  text  and  figure  labels? 

Have  copies  of  'in  press'  references  been  provided? 

□  Has  the  manuscript  been  proofread  by  all  the  authors? 

□  Have  the  manufacturers  and  their  locations  been  provided  for  all  devices  and  equipment  used? 


RF..SPIRATORY  C.^Rh  Manu.script  Preparation  Guide.  Revised  4/01 


Nc\\s  relc;tscs  about  new  producls  and  services  will  he  eniisiilered  Inr  [luhhealion  in  Ihis  seclioii. 

There  is  no  charge  for  Ihese  hsiings.  Send  descriptive  release  and  glossy  black  and  while  photographs 

to  RliSHIRATORY  Cark.  New  Products  &  Services  Depl.  I !(»()  Abies  l.ane.  Dallas  TX  7.'i2:9-45')?. 

The  Reader  Service  Card  can  be  found  al  the  back  of  the  Journal. 


New  Products 
&  Services 


Adhesive  Forehead  Sensor. The  MAX- 
FASr^'  .Adhesive  t-oivheaiJ  Sensor  is  the 
fiisi  such  iiiiun;iiion  being  introduced 
with  the  Nellcor  (hiMax  system.  Neilcor 
says  that  the  Ma.\-Fii.sl  adhesive  forehead 
sensor  offers  a  significant  advancement  in 
patient  safety  monitoring,  detecting 
changes  in  SpOs  notably  earlier  than  digit 
sensors  during  poor  perfusion  conditions. 
The  MAX-FAST  sensor  is  designed  for 
use  on  the  patient's  forehead,  a  site  closer 
to  the  heart,  w  hich  enables  it  to  respond  to 
changes  in  Spo,  t\pically  one  to  two  min- 
utes sooner  than  digit  sensors  for  patients 
with  weak  pulses.  For  more  information 
from  Nellcor.  circle  number  180  on  the 
reader  service  card  in  this  issue,  or  send 
your  request  electronically  via  "Advertis- 
ers Online"  at  http://www.aarc.org/ 
buyersguide 


Inspiratory  Mu.scle  Trainer.  Creative 
Health  Products  has  announced  the  US 
launch  of  a  new  product  range  from 
POWERbreathe' .  which  they  describe  as 
a  "revolutionary  and  versatile  inspiratory 
muscle  trainer."  According  to  Creative 
Health  Products,  the  POWERbreathe  is 
the  first  training  device  developed  specif- 
ically to  improve  lung  function.  It  is  use- 
ful for  improving  breathing  for  asthmat- 


ics and  patients  with  emphysema,  bron- 
chitis, and  cystic  fibrosis,  claims  the  man- 
ufacturer. Creative  Health  Products  says 
the  device  has  an  adjuslable  valve  system 
that  allows  increased  inspiratory  resis- 
tance as  the  patient's  muscles  strengthen, 
and  that  the  unit  is  designed  to  bypass  the 
resistance  section  during  exhalation.  For 
more  information  trom  Creative  Health 
Products,  circle  number  181  on  the  reader 
service  card  in  this  issue,  or  send  your  re- 
quest electronically  via  "Advertisers  On- 
line" at  http://www.aarc.org/buyers_ 
suidc 


Personal  Patient  Monitor.  Zoe  Medical. 
Incorporated  has  introduced  the  new 
Nightingale  PPM.  This  small,  convenient 
multi-parameter  monitor  weighs  only  2 
pounds  and  is  portable,  which  makes  it 
easier  to  support  the  more  mobile  patient, 
according  to  the  manufacturer.  It  comes 
with  an  optional  battery  and  monitors 
EKG.  SpOi.  Respiration,  blood  pressure, 
and  temperature.  For  more  information 
from  Zoe  Medical,  circle  number  182  on 
the  reader  service  card  in  this  issue,  or 
send  your  request  electronically  via  "Ad- 
vertisers Online"  at  http://www.aarc.org/ 
buyers_guide/ 


At-Honie  Diagnosis  of  Sleep  Apnea. 

Sleep  Solutions  Inc  has  intKnluced  its 
next  generation  NovaSom  QSG""  lor  al- 
home  diagnosis  of  sleep-disordered 
breathing,  including  obstructive  sleep 
apnea.  According  to  the  manufacturer, 
this  device  is  easy  to  use  and  has  been 
cleared  by  the  FDA.  They  say  it  is  the 
first  sleep  diagnostic  device  designed 
specifically  for  unassisted,  unattended  pa- 
tient use  at  home  with  clinically  proven 
equivalence  to  overnight,  in -laboratory 
polysomnography.  When  prescribed  by  a 
physician.  Sleep  Solutions  delivers  the 
device  to  the  patient's  home,  then  re- 
trieves the  device,  downloads  the  data, 
and  applies  propiietary.  automated  scor- 
ing algorithms  to  generate  a  detailed  re- 
port for  the  diagnosing  physician,  accord- 
ing to  Sleep  Solutions.  For  more  informa- 
tion from  Sleep  Solutions,  circle  number 
183  on  the  reader  service  card  in  this 
issue,  or  send  your  request  electronically 
via  "Advertisers  Online"  at  http://www. 
aarc.org/buyers_guide/ 


RESPIRATORY  CARE  •  JULY  2002  VOL  47  NO  7 


845 


Notices 


Nnijccs  1)1  cuinpL'tJlioiis.  M;holarships.  Icllowships.  cxumiiialum  dales,  new  educatu)nul  programs. 

and  tlic  like  will  be  listed  here  free  of  charge.  Ilems  lor  the  Notices  seclion  must  reach  the  Journal  60  days 

before  the  desired  month  of  publication  (January  I  for  the  March  issue.  February  I  for  the  April  issue,  etc).  Include  all 

pertinent  informalion  and  mail  notices  to  RH.SP1RATOI4Y  CarH  Notices  Depl,  1 1030  Abies  Lane.  Dallas  TX  75229-4593. 


^»UKd4.  2002 

Withholding  and  Withdrawing;  IJfe  Support  in 

the  ICU  —  GcMclon  D  Rubcnt'eld  MDMSc  / 
Richard  D  Branson  BA  RRT  FAARC  —  Videotape 
Available 

Weaning  from  Mechanical  Ventilation:  New 
Insights,  New  Guidelines  —  Neil  R  Madntyre 
MD  FAARC/  Dean  R  Hess  PhD  RRT  FAARC  — 
Videotape  Available 

Neonatal  and  Pediatric  Ventilators:  What's  the 
Difference?  —  Mark  J  Heulitt  MD  FAARC/ 
Richard  D  Branson  BA  RRT  FAARC  —  Videotape 
Available 

Ventilator  Graphs:  What's  With  That  Wave?  — 

Jon  O  Nilsestuen  PhD  RRT  FAARC/  Richard  D 
Branson  BA  RRT  FAARC  —Live  July  16;  Audio 
August  13 


Helpful  LUeb.Sites 


American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care 

http://www.aarc.org 

—  Current  job  listings 

—  American  Respiratory  Care  Foundation 
fellowships,  grants,  &  awards 

—  Clinical  Practice  Guidelines 

National  Board  for  Respiratory  Care 

h  1 1  p :  //\vw  w.  11  b  re .  o  rg 

RESPIRATORY  CARE  online 

http://www.rcjournal.com 

—  Subject  and  Author  Indexes 

—  Contact  the  editorial  staff 

—  Open  FORUM;  submit  your  abstract  online 

Asthma  Management 
Model  System 

http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov 

Keys  to  Professional  Excellence 

http://www.aarc.org/keys/ 

Committee  on  Accreditation  for  Respiratory  Care 

http://www.coarc.com 


Talking  with  Patients  and  Families  About 
Death  and  Dying —  Helen  M  Sorensen  MA  RRT 
FAARC/  David  J  Pierson  MD  FAARC  —Live 
August  20;  Audio  September  17 

Pressure  vs  Volume  Ventilation:  Does  It  Matter? 

—  Robert  S  Campbell  RRT  FAARC/  Richard  D 
Branson  BA  RRT  FAARC  —  Live  September  10/ 
Audio  October  8 

Inpatient  Management  of  COPD  —  Randall 
Rosenblatt  MD/  David  J  Pier.son  MD  FAARC  — 
Live  October  22;  Audio  November  12 

High-Frequency  Oscillatory  Ventilation  — 

Thomas  E  Stewart  MD/  Richard  D  Branson  BA 
RRT  FAARC  —  Live  No\  ember  19;  Audio 
December  10 


The  National  Board  for  Respiratory  Care — 
Examination  Fees  for  2002 


Examination 

CRT 


Perinatal/Pcdiauic 


CPFT 


RPFT 


Examination  Fees 

$190  (new  applicant) 
$150  (reapplicant) 

$250  (new  applicant) 
$220  (reapplicant) 

$200  (new  applicant) 
$170  (reapplicant) 

$250  (new  applicant) 
$220  (reapplicant) 


RRT  $190  (new)  $150  (reapplicant)  written  only 

( Written  $200  ( new  and  reapplicant )  CSE  only 

&  CSE)  $390  (new)  $.^50  (reapplicant)  both 

For  intormation  about  other  services  or  fees,  write  lo  the 

Nalional  Board  for  Respiratorv  Care. 

S.'^IO  Nieman  Road.  Lcnexa  KS  (i6'2l4.  or  call 

( ')  1  .M  .s')')-42()().  FAX  (9 1  .^ I  .s4 1  -0 1  .sd. 

or  c-niail:  nbrc-info{?'nbrc.ori; 


846 


RL..si'iR,\r()Kt  Carh  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


Nol-for-profit  organi/aliims  ;ia'  ollfa'cl  j  la-c  jilM-'rlisfmi'ill  nl  up  In  i-ighl  lines  In  .ipptMr,  on  a  sp;icc;i\\iilahlc 

hasis.  in  Calendar  of  Evcnis  in  Rf^SPlRATORI'  CAR!-:  Ads  lor  olhor  mcclings  arc  prict-il  al  S?"  Inr  nicmlvrs  and  Shi)  lor  nonincnihcrs  and 

require  an  insertion  order-  Deadline  is  the  2l)th  of  Ihc  inonih  l«o  inonihs  preceding  Ihe  monlh  in  which  you  wish  Ihc  ad  lo  run 

Siihnni  copy  and  insertion  orders  lo  Calendar  of  Eivents.  RKSI'IRAl  ORY  CARE.  1 1030  Abies  Lane.  Dallas  TX  75229-4593. 


Calendar 
of  Events 


Date 


AARC  &  State  Society  Programs 


Contact 


July  17-19  TSRC  31st  Annual  Convention  and  Exhibition; 

San  Antonio,  TX 


TSRC  Executive  Office  (972)  680-2455 


July  27 


Asthma  Information  Review  course;  Flint,  Ml 


Michigan  Society  for  Respiratory  Care. 
(734)  677-6772,  www.michiganrc.com 


Aug.  1-3  OSRC's  Contemporary  Concepts  in  Respiratory  Care; 

Indepentdence,  OH 


Tom  Kallstrom  at  tom.l<allstrom@fairvlewhospltal.org; 
or  Jeffrey  Davis  at  davisj@ccf.org 


Aug.  1-4  Georgia  Society  for  Respiratory  Care's  Summer  Meeting; 

St.  Simons,  GA 


David  Ellwanger,  (770)  991-8558, 
ellwanger_david@promina.org 


Aug.  14-16  31st  TnState  Respiratory  Care  Conference;  Biloxi,  MS 


Linda  Berry  (205)  343-8475;  www.tsrcc.org 


Sept.  5-6  Vermont/New  Hampshire  Society  for  Respiratory  Care 

Annual  Meeting;  Killington,  VT 


Xan  Gallup  (800)  333-8095,  ext.  360  or 
xgallup@merriam-graves.com 


Sept.  5-7  TSRC  North  Region  -  Pineywoods  District  1 6th  Annual  Fall 

Seminar;  Lufkin,  TX 


Ram  Mollis  (409)  639-7006 


Sept.  11-12         MSRC  25th  Annual  State  Conference;  Sturbridge,  MA 


Frances  Smith  (508)  833-9893, 
fsmith91  ©hotmail.com 


Sept.  12-13         PSRC  Southwest  District's  29th  Annual  Seminar  in 
Pulmonary  and  Sleep  Medicine;  Pittsburgh,  PA 


Gail  Varcelotti  (724)  941  -8792, 
SWDisthct@psrc.net 


Sept.  12-13         Alabama  Society  for  Respiratory  Care  Annual  Meeting; 
Birmingham,  AL 


Bill  Pruitt  (251)  434-3405  or 
wpruitt@jaguar1  .usouthal.edu 


Sept.  19- 

•20 

Kansas  Respiratory  Care  Society  Western  Kansas 
Conference;  Hays,  KS 

www.krcs.org  or  e-mail  Julia  Downs 
at  jddrrt@yahoo.com 

Oct.5-8 

AARC  48th  International  Respiratory  Congress;  Tampa,  FL 

AARC,  (972)  243-2272,  www.aarc.org 

Date 

Other  Meetings 

Contact 

Sept.  13-14 

Practical  Spirometry  Certification  Course;  Chicago,  IL 

Mayo  Pulmonary  Services  Education  Office, 
(800)533-1653 

Oct.  31  -  Nov.  1    Practical  Spirometry  Certification  Course;  Rochester,  MN 


Mayo  Pulmonary  Services  Education  Office, 
(800)533-1653 


Respiratory  Care  .  July  2002  vol  47  No  7 


847 


Authors 

in  This  Issue 


Blair.  Jim    829 

Clouiier.  Michelle  M    833 

Colby.  Conrad    833 

Da\  idson.  Kalhryn  L    823 

l-iiik,  James  B    75^.  769.  786.  797 

Graham.  Mark  G 834 

Hess.  Dean  R   757 


Lapin.  Craig  D    778 

Lew  IS.  Robert  M 808 

Mahlmeister,  Michael  J 797 

Malhewson,  Hugh  S   830 

Rubin.  Bruce  K^  759.  761,  818 

Sobush.  Dennis  C 829 

Weaver.  Lindell  K    831 


Advertisers 
in  This  Issue 


T(t  advertise  in  RKSIMKA  H)H\  C  \RI-:,  contact  Tim  Goldshun.  Director.  Ad\t'rtising  Sales,  e-mail:  goldsbun  (?'  aarc.org  for  rates 
and  media  information.  Contact  Karen  Camlet.  Advertising  Representative,  e-mail:  camlet <"  aarc.org.  for  recruitment/classified 
advertising.  Saks  olTice:  J8I»  Tcqui'sta  Drive.  Tequesta.  FL  .VM69.  Telephone:  551-745-6793,  Kax:  551-745-5795. 

Send  production  materlials  for  AARC  publications  to  Binklev  @aarc.org  or  AARC.  11030  Abies  Lane.  Dallas  TX  75229^593 
c/o  Beth  Binklev 


Circle  #         Company 


Page  # 


Phone 


Fax 


E-mail/\Vebsile 


122 

Advanced  Respiratory 

747 

S()()-426-4224 

ll.^i 

Dale  Medical  Prodiicls.  Inc. 

737 

S()0-343-398() 

116 

DHD  Healthcare 

C4 

800-847-8000 

315-363-5694 

119 

Hans  Rudolph.  Inc. 

749 

800-456-6695 

816-822-1414 

120 

J  H  Emerson 

751 

800-252-1414 

124 

Memorial  Hospital  of  South  Bend  836 

SEE  AD 

114 

Monaghan 

740 

800-833-9653 

117 

Nephron  Phannaceulicals  Corp 

C3 

800-443-4313 

407-999-0133 

113 

Praxair 

744 

800-299-7977 

121 

Pulnionclic  Systems 

751 

SEE  AD 

IIX 

Respironics 

C2 

800-962-1266 

112 

Siemens 

742 

SEE  AD 

123 

Washoe  Health  Svsteni 

836 

775-982-6387 

123 

Whidbey  General  Hospital 

836 

360-678-7656 

www  .thc\  est.com 
wwu.daleiiied.com 
www.dhd.com 
www. rudolphkc.com 
www.coughassisI.com 

www.monaghannied.com 
www.nephronpharm.com 

www.pulmoneticsystenis.com 
www.respironics.coni 
www. servo-i.com 
www.washoeheallh.coni 
www.whidbeygen.org 


{'()l•^Kl(;HT  Information.  Rhsi'ikaiorv  Cake  is  copyrighted  hy 

IXicdalus  Enterprises  Inc.  Repriidiiclioii  in  u  hole  or  In  part  without  the  express 
written  pemiission  ot  Daedalus  Enterprises  Inc  is  prohihited.  Pemiission  to 
photocopy  a  single  iulicle  in  this  Journal  lor  noncommercial  purposes  of  scien- 
tific or  educational  advancement  is  granted.  Pennission  for  multiple  photo- 
copies and  copies  for  commercial  purposes  must  be  requested  in  writing,  via  e- 
mail  lb;ircusCn'aarc.org).  or  telephone  (972-243-2272).  and  approved  by  RBS- 
I'lRATOR'i'  Care.  Anyone  may.  without  permission,  quote  up  to  .^(K)  words 
of  material  in  this  journal  provided  the  quotation  is  for  noncommercial  use  and 
RESPIRATOR'!'  C.-\RI-:  is  credited.  Longer  quotation  requires  w  ritten  approval 
by  the  author  and  publisher.  Single  reprints  are  available  only  from  the  au- 
thors. Reprints  for  commercial  use  may  be  purchased  from  Daedalus  Enter- 
prises Inc.  For  more  infomiation  and  prices  call  972-243-2272. 

Disclaimer.  The  opinions  expressed  in  any  article  or  editorial  are  those 
of  the  author  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  Editors,  the 
American  Association  for  Respiratory  Care  (AARC).  or  Daedalus  Enter- 
prises Inc.  Neither  are  the  Editors,  the  AARC.  or  the  Publisher  responsible 
for  the  consequences  of  the  clinical  applications  or  use  of  any  methods  or  de- 
vices described  in  any  article  or  advertisement. 

SUBSCRIFITON  RaTK.S.  Domestic  individual  subscription  rales  are 
$89.9.'i  per  year  (12  issues)  and  $174.90  for  2  years  in  the  US  and  Puerto 
Rico.  Foreign  individual  rates  are  $109  per  year  and  $208  for  2  years  in  all 
other  countries  (add  $94  per  year  for  air  mail).  Domestic  institutional  rates 


are  $1  I9.y,s  for  one  year  and  $229.90  for  two  years.  Foreign  institutional 
rates  are  $130  for  one  year  and  $2.s.'v  for  two  years. Single  copies  when 
available  cost  $10;  add  $9  for  air  mail  postage  to  oveiseas  countries. 
Checks  should  be  made  payable  to  RESPIRATOR'*'  CARE  and  sent  to  the 
Subscription  Department  at  1  1030  Abies  Lane.  Dallas  TX  75229-4593.  or 
call  972-24.V2272. 

SLB.SCRIPTION  RaTF:S  for  Associations.  Basic  annual  subscrip- 
tions are  ottered  to  members  of  asscxiations  according  to  their  memhership  en- 
rollment: 1 0 1  -.St  X)  niembeiN  =  $  1 6.2.Vyear  ( each  i;  .SO  1  - 1  ..SO)  =  $  1 5.7.Vyear  (each ); 
1 .5(X)- 1  ().(XK)  =  $  14.7.'i/ye;ir  (each);  more  than  I  O.(XX)  =  $13.75/year'(each).  For 
infomiation.  contact  Ray  Masferrer  at  972-243-2272. 

CR-\N<;k  of  ADDRFXS.  Notify  the  AARC  at  972-243-2272  as  soon  as 
possible  of  any  change  in  address.  Note  the  subscription  number  (from  the 
mailing  label)  and  your  name,  old  address,  and  new  address.  Allow  6 
weeks  for  the  change.  To  avoid  charges  for  replacement  copies  of  missed  is- 
sues, requests  must  he  made  within  60  days  in  the  ILS  and  90  days  in  other 
countries. 

MaNIISCRIPTS.  The  Journal  publishes  clinical  studies,  method/device 
evaluations,  reviews,  and  other  materials  related  to  cardiopulmonary  med- 
icine and  research.  Manuscripts  may  be  submitted  to  the  Editorial  Office.  Res- 
piratory Care.  600  Ninth  Avenue.  Suite  702.  Seattle  WA  9X104.  Tele- 
phone 206-223-0558.  Instructions  for  authors  are  printed  in  every  issue. 


848 


Respiratory  Care  •  July  2002  Vol  47  No  7 


...An  Ansvs^er  to  Cross  Contamination! 


'Respiratory  Care 
Subscription  Form 

I.S.  SubscriptioiK 

J  '89.95 


SulnaiiKiaiK  Oufeide  us. 
C'KW 

z  '208   > 
C'130    ) 

n'255     > 


RESPlRATO/tY  Care  is  the  most  highly 
reganlcd  pccr-reviewed  scientific 
publication  lor  ihc  Chnician  partici- 
pating in  the  evaluation 
and  care  of  patients  with  cardiopul- 
monan  problems 
Please  print;  incomplete  forms 
will  not  be  processed.  For  faster 
service,  fax  to  (972l4)«-2720 

Enclosed  is  a  check  in 
the  amount  of 

$ 

Chai^tomy: 

D   Mastercard 

D   Visa 

D  Bill  Me         ^^^^ 


SignMuR 

Expiration  Date 

Credit  Can)  Numlier 

Name 

Title 

Ficilily  Name 

Addiess 

City 


Telephone 


Zip  Code  Country 

RE/PIRATORy  CARE 


Receive  FREE  information  on  the  products 
and  services  mentioned  in  this  issue,  by  cir- 
cling the  corresponding  advertiser's  num- 
ber. Fill  in  your  name  and  address  and  mail 
ihis  posiage-paid  card.  Information  will  be 
sent  directly  to  you  from  the  manufacturer. 
Incomplete  forms  will  not  be  processed. 


Information 

.c   nil 

■  ^  ktinK.r.*!  Cv«  luHtti^Kfl  infCTTnWion.  t 

^■Bie  103  104  109 

106 

107    108    109    110 

111 

112 

113 

114 

115    116    117    118 

ii'i   i:ii  i:i    Ml  \2i 

i:4 

1:5    126    127    128 

129 

I'n 

\M 

i<; 

1  tt     1  t4     M^     1  <n 

Bt.  138    139    140    141 

142 

143    144    145    146 

147 

148 

149 

ISO 

151    IS2   I^IM: 

155 

.,M 

IM     152    163    161 

165 

1^', 

I'l^ 

,„s 

w    170    171    172 

WKam^iii  i7b  177 

I7H 

179    180    181    182 

183 

184 

18."^ 

186 

187    188    M   IW 

191     192    193    194    195 

1% 

197     198     199    2(X) 

IVxnKleKxnoKlluii 

„™ 

Name 

Title 

Facility  Name 

Additss 

City                                    Slau 

Zip  code 

Counny 

Telephone 

July  2002    Enpirw  10/15/02 


RE/PIRATORy  CARE 


T^TEOFINS 
OR  PRACTICE 

1  O  Hospital 

2  □  Skilled  Nursing  Facility 

3  D  Subacute  Care  Facility 

4  D  Home  Care  Practice 

5  n  School 

6  □  Distributor 

11  DEPARTMENT 

A  D  Respiratory  Care 
B   D  Cardiopulmonary 
C  D  Subacute  Care 
D  D  Home  Care 

m  SPECIALTY 

1  D  Clinician 

2  D  Perinatal/  Pediatrics 

3  D  Critical  Care 

4  n  Research 

5  D  Subacute  Care 

6  n  Diagnostics/ 


lonary  Function 

7  D  Management 

8  D  Home  Care 

9  a  Rehabilitation 

10  D  Education 

IV     POSITION 

A  n  Department  Head 
B   a  Chief  Therapi.st 
C   n  Supervisor 
D  n  Staff  Therapist/ 

Technician 
E   G  Medical  Director 
F   D  Educator/lnstnjctor 
G  n  Sales 
H  G  Other  (pleaK&pecify) 


V  y^RE  YOU  AN  AARC  MEM- 
BER? 

I    D  Yes    2    a   No 


hrine 

ISP  2.25% 

-99 

'rapped 
Sulfite  Free 
Ise  Vials 


43  I  3 


in  This  Issue 

Blair,  Jim   829 

Cloulier,  Michelle  M    833 

Colby.  Conrad    833 

Davidson.  K.ithn  n  1 823 

Fink.  James  B    lf,9.  769.  786.  797 

Graham,  Mark  G 834 

Hess.  Dean  R    757 


Lapin.  Craig  D   778 

Lewis.  Robert  M 808 

Mahlmeistcr.  Michael  J 797 

Mathewson.  Hugh  S  830 

Rubin.  Bruce  K     759,  761.  818 

.Sobush.  Dennis  C 829 

Weaver,  l.indell  K    831 


Adverti 

in 

I'his  1; 

Circle  #         Conipan 

122 

Ad\ance 

115 

Dale  Mei 

116 

DHDHe 

119 

Hans  Ru. 

120 

J  H  Emei 

124 

Memoria 

114 

Monas;h; 

117 

Nephron 

113 

Praxair 

121 

Pulmone 

118 

Respiron 

112 

Siemens 

125 

Washoe  1 

123 

Whidbey 

BUSINESS  REPLY  MAIL 

FIRST-CLASS  MAIL  PERMIT  NO.  2480  Dallas.TX 


NO  POSTAGE 

NECESSARY 

IF  MAILED 

IN  THE 

UNITED  STATES 


POSTAGE  WILL  BE  PAID  BY  ADDRESSEE 

AARC  Subscriptions 

ATTN:  Beth  Binkley 
PO  BOX  29686 
Dallas  TX  75229-9691 


11... 1. 1. 1. ..I, I. ,1,11. 1, .1.1... II, .1.1 Nil... I 


C<)P\RK;Hr   INKOKM 

Daedalus  F,nlerpnscs  Inc 
written  permission  of  D 
photocopy  a  single  articK 
title  or  educational  adva 
copies  and  copies  for  con 
mail  (barcusCn'aarc.ori!). 
PIRATOK"!-  CARII.  Anyc 
of  matenal  in  thisjoiiiiial 

Respiratory  Carf  is 

by  the  author  and  puhliv 
thors.  Reprints  for  comn 
prises  Inc.  For  more  infoi 

Dl.sci  AIMKR.  Theopi 

of  the  author  anil  do  m 
American  Association  I 
prises  Inc.  Neither  arc  tl 
for  the  consequences  of  I 
vices  described  in  any  a 

SuBSCRiPiioN  Rati 

S.89.y.S  per  scar  (12  issi 
Rico.  Foreign  individua 
other  countries  (add  $9"; 


BUSINESS  REPLY  MAIL 

FIRST-CLASS  MAIL  PERMIT  NO.  881  Riverton,  Nd 


NO  POSTAGE 

NECESSARY 

IF  MAILED 

IN  THE 

UNITED  STATES 


POSTAGE  WILL  BE  PAID  BY  ADDRESSEE 


AARC  Publications 

PO  BOX  11605 
Riverton  NJ  08076-7205 


848 


III...I..I.II...I...I.II..I...I..I.III....I.I..I.I.I 


Nov/  Available  from  Nephron  Pharmaceuticals... 
...An  Ansv/er  to  Cross  Contamination! 


m 


Our  0.5  mL 
Unit-of-Use  Vials 


Albuterol  Sulfate  Inhalation  Solution,  0.5%' 


^'tS> 


•Poiency  Mcreii^;  ai  «v«ra 

Rionly 

DILUTE  BEFORE  U 

soft  ORAL  •WALATCN  O) 

5E 

Albuterol  Sulfate 

Inhalation  Solution  0.5% 

NDC  0487-9901 -30 

•  Sterile  •  Preservative  and  Additive  Free 

•  Individually  Foil  Wrapped 

•  Box  of  30  Unit-of-Use  Vials 


Raceplnephhne  Inhalation  Solution,  USP,  2.25% 

(.1  bfnnftwOKjtoft 
For  Ofol  inhalaltw  Oo'y 


fAMpgftgviocMTrenwwe  Of -ntpw  <»»»>«  «*»»«■»=?' »■" 

30  I  0.5  mL  St*rlt«  Unll^-Ua*  Villa 

■iiytLmimiwui.i  m\.wmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 

Racepinephrine 

Inhalation  Solution  USP  2.25% 

NDC  0487-5901 -99 

•  Individually  Foil  Wrapped 

•  Sterile  •  Unit-of-Use  •  Sulfite  Free 

•  Box  of  30  Unit-of-Use  Vials 


& 


nephron 

pharmaceuticals 

corporation 


4121  34th  St.   •  Orlando,  Florida  32811 

Telephone  (407)  246-1389  •  Fax  (407)  999-0133  •  Toll  Free  (800)  443-4313 

sales@nephronpharm.coiTi  •  www.nephronpharm.com 

Circle  1 1 7  on  product  information  card 


o 


DHD 

Healthcare 

InnovuUdnsfor  respiraton-  care 

One  Madison  Sircci.  Wampsvillc.  NY  13163  USA 
(8f»())M7-80O0   (315)363-2330   FAX:  (315)363-5694 
www.dhd.com 

KjfKlta  l^  I  rvfiMcrcd  iradcmirit  of  DHD  Hcjiihcirc  Corpnniiim 
fi  2i»'\  !)H[)  Healthcare  Corporsiion 


^m 


MniK-AL 
DESIGN 
EXtnXENCE 
AWARDS' 
^001  WINNER 


(Btofin 
cmm 

It  works  in  virtually  any  position,  with  virtually  any  patient 

Vibrttlory  PiP  Therapy 

•  Improves  clearance  of  secretions. 

•  Easier  to  tolerate  than  CPT. 

•  Less  than  half  the  time  of  conventional  CPT  session*. 

•  Facilitates  opening  of  airways  in  patients  with  lung  diseases 
with  secretory  problems  (COPD,  asthma,  Cystic  Fibrosis). 

Tired  of  confining  patients  to  an  uncomfortable,  upright  position  for  vibratory  PEP'^  With 
new  acapella.  you  don't  have  to  take  that  sitting  down!  Its  unique  design  permits  use  while 
standing,  reclining  or  walking.  So  now  everyone  from  active  pediatrics,  to  bedridden  patients, 
can  benefit  from  secretion  clearance  therapy  Color-coded  units  (green  for  high-flow,  blue  for  low) 
help  you  customize  treatment  based  on  clinical  needs.  You  can  adjust  acapella"s  frequency 
and  flow  resistance  simply  by  turning  an  adjustment  dial.  And  because  therapy  can  be  self- 
administered  in  any  setting,  you'll  provide  an  effective  continuum  of  care  outside  the  hospital. 
Fi)r  the  new  generation  of  vibratory  PEP  therapy,  call  DHD  Healthcare  toll-free  today: 
1-800-847-8000.  acapella.  No  instrumental  accompaniment  required. 


•  Mihlma^icr  MJ  ci  il  '  Pov 


i,k  thcrap,  TlKorctiiil  and  PtJtli.il  OwiMJcrili.^i.  anj  i  Kfnc  <>!  the  Incnluft* ,  lif<i'in. 


Circle  1  16  on  product  information  card