Skip to main content

Full text of "Revegetation of oil sands tailings : growth improvement of silver-berry and buffalo-berry by inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi and N?-fixing bacteria"

See other formats


REPORT  # 
RRTAC  88-3 


Revegetation  Of  Oil  Sands  Tailings: 
Growth  Improvement  Of  Silver-Berry  And 
Buffalo-Berry  By  Inoculation  With 
Mycorrhizal  Fungi  And  Na-Fixing  Bacteria 


Heritage  Fund 


Jbcsna 

LAND  CONSERVATION  AND 
RECLAMATION  COUNCIL 
Reclamation  Research 
Technical  Advisory  Committee 


Report  No.  RRTAC  88-3 


REVEGETATION  OF  OIL  SANDS  TAILINGS: 

GROWTH  IMPROVEMENT  OF  SILVER-BERRY  AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 
BY  INOCULATION  WITH  MYCORRHIZAL  FUNGI 
AND  N2-FIXING  BACTERIA 


BY 

Suzanne  Visser 
and 

Robert  M.  Danielson 

Kananaskis  Centre  for  Environmental  Research 
The  University  of  Calgary 


Prepared  for 

The  Oil  Sands  Reclamation  Research  Program 
of 

THE  LAND  CONSERVATION  AND  RECLAMATION  COUNCIL 
(Reclamation  Research  Technical  Advisory  Committee) 


1988 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 
in  2015 


https://archive.org/details/revegetationofoiOOviss 


STATEMENT  OF  OBJECTIVE 


The  recommendations  and  conclusions  in  this  report  are  those  of  the 
authors  and  not  those  of  the  Alberta  Government  or  its 
representati ves. 

This  report  is  intended  to  provide  government  and  industry  staff 
with  up-to-date  technical  information  to  assist  in  the  development  of 
guidelines  and  operating  procedures.  The  report  is  also  available  to 
the  public  so  that  interested  individuals  similarly  have  access  to  the 
best  available  information  on  land  reclamation  topics. 


TV 


ALBERTA'S  RECLAMATION  RESEARCH  PROGRAM 


The  regulation  of  surface  disturbances  in  Alberta  is  the 
responsibility  of  the  Land  Conservation  and  Reclamation  Council.  The 
Council  executive  consists  of  a Chairman  from  the  Department  of 
Forestry,  Lands  and  Wildlife.  Among  other  functions,  the  Council 
oversees  programs  for  reclamation  of  abandoned  disturbances  and 

reclamation  research.  The  Reclamation  Research  Program  was  established 
to  provide  answers  to  the  many  practical  questions  which  arise  in 
reclamation.  Funds  for  implementing  both  the  operational  and  research 
programs  are  drawn  from  Alberta's  Heritage  Savings  Trust  Fund. 

To  assist  in  technical  matters  related  to  the  development  and 
administration  of  the  Research  Program,  the  Council  appointed  the 
Reclamation  Research  Advisory  Committee  (RRTAC).  The  Committee  first 
met  in  March  1978  and  consists  of  eight  members  representing  the  Alberta 
Departments  of  Agriculture,  Energy,  Forestry,  Lands  and  Wildlife, 
Environment  and  the  Alberta  Research  Council.  The  Committee  meets 
regularly  to  update  research  priorities,  review  solicited  and 
unsolicited  research  proposals,  arrange  workshops  and  otherwise  act  as  a 
referral  and  coordinating  body  for  Reclamation  Research. 

Additional  information  on  the  Reclamation  Research  Program  may  be 
obtained  by  contacting: 

Dr.  G.A.  Singleton,  Chairman 

Reclamation  Research  Technical  Advisory  Committee 

Alberta  Environment 

4th  Floor,  Oxbridge  Place 

9820  - 106  Street 

Edmonton,  Alberta  T5K  2J6 

(403)  427-5868 

This  report  may  be  cited  as:  Visser,  S.  and  R.M.  Danielson,  1988. 
Revegetation  of  Oil  Sands  Tailings:  Growth  Improvement  of  Silver-Berry 
and  Buffalo-Berry  by  Inoculation  with  Mycorrhizal  Fungi  and  N^-Fixing 
Bacteria.  Alberta  Land  Conservation  and  Reclamation  Counci r Report 
#RRTAC  88-3.  98  pp. 


Additional  copies  may  be  obtained  from: 

Publication  Services 
Queen's  Printer 
11510  Kingsway  Avenue 
Edmonton,  Alberta  T5G  2Y5 


V 


RECLAMATION  RESEARCH  REPORTS 

**  1.  RRTAC  80-3: 

The  Role  of  Organic  Compounds  in  Salinization  of 
Plains  Coal  Mining  Sites.  N.S.C.  Cameron  et  al . 
46  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  is  a literature  review  of  the  chemistry  of 
sodic  mine  spoil  and  the  changes  expected  to 
occur  in  groundwater. 

**  2.  RRTAC  80-4: 

Proceedings:  Workshop  on  Reconstruction  of 
Forest  Soils  in  Reclamation.  P.F.  Ziemkiewicz, 
S.K.  Takyi,  and  H.F.  Regier.  160  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Experts  in  the  field  of  forestry  and  forest  soils 
report  on  research  relevant  to  forest  soil 
reconstruction  and  discuss  the  most  effective 
means  of  restoring  forestry  capability  of  mined 
lands. 

N/A  3.  RRTAC  80-5: 

Manual  of  Plant  Species  Suitability  for 
Reclamation  in  Alberta.  L.E.  Watson,  R.W. 
Parker,  and  P.F.  Polster.  2 vols,  541  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Forty-three  grass,  fourteen  forb,  and  thirty- 
four  shrub  and  tree  species  are  assessed  in  terms 
of  their  fitness  for  use  in  Reclamation. 
Range  maps,  growth  habit,  propagation,  tolerance, 
and  availability  information  are  provided. 

N/A  4.  RRTAC  81-2: 

1980  Survey  of  Reclamation  Activities  in  Alberta. 
D.G.  Walker  and  R.L.  Rothwell.  76  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  survey  is  an  update  of  a report  prepared  in 
1976  on  reclamation  activities  in  Alberta,  and 
includes  research  and  operational  reclamation, 
locations,  personnel,  etc. 

N/A  5.  RRTAC  81-3: 

Proceedings:  Workshop  on  Coal  Ash  and 
Reclamation.  P.F.  Ziemkiewicz,  R.  Stien,  R. 
Leitch,  and  G.  Lutwick.  253  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Presents  nine  technical  papers  on  the  chemical, 
physical  and  engineering  properties  of  Alberta 
fly  and  bottom  ashes,  revegetation  of  ash 

disposal  sites  and  use  of  ash  as  a soil 

amendment.  Workshop  discussions  and  summaries 
are  also  included. 

VI 


N/A  6»  RRTAC82-1: 

Land  Surface  Reclamation:  An  International 
Bibl iography.  H.P.  Sims  and  C.B.  Powter.  2 
vols,  292  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Literature  to  1980  pertinent  to  reclamation  in 
Alberta  is  listed  in  Vol . 1 and  is  also  on  the 
University  of  Alberta  computing  system.  Vol . 2 
comprises  the  keyword  index  and  computer  access 
manual . 

N/A  7.  RRTAC  82-2: 

A Bibliography  of  Baseline  Studies  in  Alberta: 
Soils,  Geology,  Hydrology  and  Groundwater.  C.B. 
Powter  and  H.P.  Sims.  97  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  bibliography  provides  baseline  information 
for  persons  involved  in  reclamation  research  or 
in  the  preparation  of  environmental  impact 
assessments.  Materials,  up  to  date  as  of 

December  1981,  are  available  from  the  Alberta 
Environment  Library. 

N/A  8»  RRTAC  83-1: 

Soil  Reconstruction  Design  for  Reclamation  of  Oil 
Sand  Tailings.  Monenco  Consultants  Ltd. 

185  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Volumes  of  peat  and  clay  required  to  amend  oil 
sand  tailings  were  estimated  based  on  existing 
literature.  Separate  soil  prescriptions  were 

made  for  spruce,  jack  pine,  and  herbaceous  cover 
types.  The  estimates  form  the  basis  of  field 

tri al s . 

N/A  9.  RRTAC  83-3: 

Evaluation  of  Pipeline  Reclamation  Practices  on 
Agricultural  Lands  in  Alberta.  Hardy  Associates 
(1978)  Ltd.  205  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Available  information  on  pipeline  reclamation 
practices  was  reviewed.  A field  survey  was  then 
conducted  to  determine  the  effects  of  pipe  size, 
age,  soil  type,  construction  method,  etc.  on 
resulting  crop  production. 

N/A  lOo  RRTAC  83-4: 

Proceedings:  Effects  of  Coal  Mining  on  Eastern 

Slopes  Hydrology.  P.F.  Ziemkiewicz.  123  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Technical  papers  are  presented  dealing  with  the 
impacts  of  mining  on  mountain  watersheds,  their 
flow  characteristics  and  resulting  water  quality. 
Mitigative  measures  and  priorities  were  also 
di scussed. 

N/A  n.  RRTAC  83-5: 


N/A  n.  RRTAC  83-5: 
DESCRIPTION: 

vi  i 

Woody  Plant  Establishment  and  Management  for  Oil 
Sands  Mine  Reclamation.  Techman  Engineering  Ltd. 
124  pp. 

This  is  a review  and  analysis  of  information  on 
planting  stock  quality,  rearing  site  preparation, 
planting  and  procedures  necessary  to  ensure 
survival  of  trees  and  shrubs  in  oil  sand 
reclamation. 

***12.  RRTAC  84-1: 

Land  Surface  Reclamation:  A Review  of 
International  Literature.  H.P.  Sims,  C.B. 
Powter,  and  J.A.  Campbell.  2 vols,  1549  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Nearly  all  topics  of  interest  to  reclamation 
including  mining  methods,  soil  amendments, 
revegetation,  propagation  and  toxic  materials  are 
reviewed  in  light  of  the  international 
1 iterature. 

**  13.  RRTAC  84-2: 

Propagation  Study:  Use  of  Trees  and  Shrubs  for 
Oil  Sand  Reclamation.  Techman  Engineering  Ltd. 
58  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  evaluates  and  summarizes  all 
available  published  and  unpublished  information 
on  large-scale  propagation  methods  for  shrubs  and 
trees  to  be  used  in  oil  sand  reclamation. 

* 14.  RRTAC  84-3: 

Reclamation  Research  Annual  Report  - 1983.  P.F, 
Ziemkiewicz.  42  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  details  the  Reclamation  Research 
Program  indicating  priorities,  descriptions  of 
each  research  project,  researchers,  results  and 
expenditures. 

**  15.-  RRTAC  84-4: 

Soil  Microbiology  in  Land  Reclamation.  D. 

Parkinson,  R.M.  Danielson,  C.  Griffiths,  S. 
Visser,  and  J.C.  Zak.  2 vols,  676  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  is  a collection  of  five  reports  dealing  with 
re-establishment  of  fungal  decomposers  and 
mycorrhizal  symbol nts  in  various  amended  spoil 
types. 

**  16.  RRTAC  85-1: 

Proceedings:  Revegetation  Methods  for  Alberta's 

Mountains  and  Foothills.  P.F.  Ziemkiewicz. 

416  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Results  of  long-term  experiments  and  field 
experience  on  species  selection,  fertilization, 
reforestation,  topsoiling,  shrub  propagation  and 
establishment  are  presented. 

VI 1 1 


* 17,  RRTAC  85-2:  Reclamation  Research  Annual  Report  - 1984.  P.F. 

Ziemkiewicz.  29  pp. 

DESCRIPTION:  This  report  details  the  Reclamation  Research 

Program  indicating  priorities,  descriptions  of 
each  research  project,  researchers,  results  and 
expenditures. 


**  18. 

RRTAC  86-1 : 

A Critical  Analysis  of  Settling  Pond 
Alternative  Technologies.  A.  Somani . 

Design  and 
372  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

The  report  examines  the  critical 
settling  pond  design  and  sizing  and 
technologies. 

issue  of 
alternative 

**  19. 

RRTAC  86-2: 

Characterization  and  Variability 
Reconstructed  after  Surface  Mining 
Alberta.  T.M.  Macyk.  146  pp. 

of  Soi  1 
in  Central 

DESCRIPTION: 

Reconstructed  soils  representing 

different 

materials  handling  and  replacement  techniques 
were  characterized  and  variability  in  chemical 
and  physical  properties  was  assessed.  The  data 
obtained  indicate  that  reconstructed  soil 
properties  are  determined  largely  by  parent 
material  character! sties  and  further  tempered  by 
materials  handling  procedures.  Mining  tends  to 
create  a relatively  homogeneous  soil  landscape  in 
contrast  to  the  mixture  of  diverse  soils  found 
before  mining. 

* 20.  RRTAC  86-3:  Generalized  Procedures  for  Assessing  Post-Mining 

Groundwater  Supply  Potential  in  the  Plains  of 
Alberta  - Plains  Hydrology  and  Reclamation 
Project.  M.R.  Trudell  and  S.R.  Moran.  30  pp. 

DESCRIPTION:  In  the  Plains  region  of  Alberta,  the  surface 

mining  of  coal  generally  occurs  in  rural , 
agricultural  areas  in  which  domestic  water  supply 
requirements  are  met  almost  entirely  by  ground- 
water.  Consequently,  an  important  aspect  of  the 
capability  of  reclaimed  lands  to  satisfy  the 
needs  of  a residential  component  is  the 
post-mining  availability  of  groundwater.  This 
report  proposes  a sequence  of  steps  or  procedures 
to  identify  and  characterize  potential 
post-mining  aquifers. 


IX 


**  21.  RRTAC  86-4: 

Geology  of  the  Battle  River  Site:  Plains 
Hydrology  and  Reclamation  Project.  A Maslowski- 
Schutze,  R.  Li,  M.  Fenton  and  S.R.  Moran.  86  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  summarzies  the  geological  setting  of 
the  Battle  River  study  site.  It  is  designed  to 
provide  a general  understanding  of  geological 
conditions  adequate  to  establish  a framework  for 
hydrogeological  and  general  reclamation  studies. 
The  report  is  not  intended  to  be  a detailed 
synthesis  such  as  would  be  required  for  mine 
planning  purposes. 

**  22.  RRTAC  86-5: 

Chemical  and  Mineral ogi  cal  Properties  of 
Overburden:  Plains  Hydrology  and  Reclamation 
Program.  A.  Maslowski-Schutze.  71  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  describes  the  physical  and 
mineral ogi cal  properties  of  overburden  materials 
in  an  effort  to  identify  individual  beds  within 
the  bedrock  overburden  that  might  be 
significantly  different  in  terms  of  reclamation 
potenti al . 

* 23.  RRTAC  86-6: 

Post-Mining  Groundwater  Supply  at  the  Battle 
River  Site:  Plains  Hydrology  and  Reclamation 
Project.  M.R.  Trudell,  G.J.  Sterenberg  and  S.R.- 
Moran.  49  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

The  report  deals  with  the  availability  of  water 
supply  in  or  beneath  cast  overburden  at  the 
Battle  River  Mining  area  in  east-central  Alberta 
to  support  post-mining  land  use.  Both 
groundwater  quantity  and  quality  are  evaluated. 

* 24.  RRTAC  86-7: 

Post-Mining  Groundwater  Supply  at  the  Highvale 
Site:  Plains  Hydrology  and  Reclamation  Project. 

M.R.  Trudel 1 . 25  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  evaluates  the  availability  of  water 
supply  in  or  beneath  cast  overburden  to  support 
post-mining  land  use,  including  both  quantity  and 
quality  considerations.  The  study  area  is  the 
Highvale  mining  area  in  west-central  Alberta. 

* 25.  RRTAC  86-8: 

Reclamation  Research  Annual  Report  - 1985. 

P.F.  Ziemkiewicz.  54  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  details  the  Reclamation  Research 
Program  indicating  priorities,  descriptions  of 
each  research  project,  researchers,  results  and 
expenditures. 

X 

c 

**  26.  RRTAC  86-9: 

Wildlife  Habitat  Requirements  and  Reclamation 
Techniques  for  the  Mountains  and  Foothills  of 
Alberta.  J.E.  Green*  R.E.  Salter  and  D.G. 

Walker.  285  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  presents  a review  of  relevant  North 
American  literature  on  wildlife  habitats  in 
mountain  and  foothills  biomes*  reclamation 
techniques,  potential  problems  in  wildlife 
habitat  reclamation,  and  potential  habitat 
assessment  methodologies.  Four  biomes  (Alpine, 
Subalpine,  Montane,  and  Boreal  Uplands)  and  10 
key  wildlife  species  (snowshoe  hare,  beaver, 
muskrat,  elk,  moose,  caribou,  mountain  goat, 
bighorn  sheep,  spruce  grouse,  and  white-tailed 
ptarmigan)  are  discussed. 

**  27.  RRTAC  87-1: 

Disposal  of  Drilling  Wastes.  L.A.  Leskiw,  E. 
Reinl -Dwyer,  T.L.  Dabrowski , B.J.  Rutherford  and 
H.  Hamilton.  210  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Current  drilling  waste  disposal  practices  are 
reviewed  and  criteria  in  Alberta  guidelines  are 
assessed.  The  report  also  identifies  research 
needs  and  indicates  mitigation  measures.  A 
manual  included  provides  a decision-making 
flowchart  to  assist  in  selecting  methods  of 
environmental ly  safe  waste  disposal. 

**  28.  RRTAC  87-2: 

Minesoil  and  Landscape  Reclamation  of  the  Coal 
Mines  in  Alberta's  Mountains  and  Foothills.  A.W. 
Fedkenheuer,  L.J.  Knapik,  and  D.G.  Walker. 
174  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  reviews  current  reclamation  practices 
with  regard  to  site  and  soil  reconstruction  and 
re-establishment  of  biological  productivity.  It 
also  identifies  research  needs  in  the 
Mountain-Foothills  area. 

**  29.  RRTAC  87-3: 

Gel  and  Saline  Drilling  Wastes  in  Alberta: 
Workshop  Proceedings.  D.A.  Lloyd  (compiler). 

218  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

Technical  papers  were  presented  which  describe: 
the  mud  systems  used  and  their  purpose; 
industrial  constraints;  government  regulations, 
procedures  and  concerns;  environmental 
considerations  in  waste  disposal;  and  toxic 
constituents  of  drilling  wastes.  Answers  to  a 
questionnaire  distributed  to  participants  are 
included  in  an  appendix. 

XT 


* 30.  RRTAC  87-4: 

Reclamation  Research  Annual  Report  - 1986. 

50  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  details  the  Reclamation  Research 
Program  indicating  priorities,  descriptions  of 
each  research  project,  researchers,  results  and 
expenditures . 

* 31.  RRTAC  87-5: 

Review  of  the  Scientific  Basis  of  Water  Quality 
Criteria  for  the  East  Slope  Foothills  of 
Alberta.  Beak  Associates  Consulting  Ltd. 
46  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

The  report  reviews  existing  Alberta  guidelines 
to  assess  the  quality  of  water  drained  from  coal 
mine  sites  in  the  East  Slope  Foothills  of 
Alberta.  World  literature  was  reviewed  within 
the  context  of  the  east  slopes  environment  and 
current  mining  operations.  The  ability  of  coal 
mine  operators  to  meet  the  various  guidelines  is 
di scussed. 

**  32.  RRTAC  87-6: 

Assessing  Design  Flows  and  Sediment  Discharge  on 
the  Eastern  Slopes.  Hydrocon  Engineering 
(Continental)  Ltd.  and  Monenco  Consultants  Ltd. 
97  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

The  report  provides  an  evaluation  of  current 
methodologies  used  to  determine  sediment  yields 
due  to  rainfall  events  in  well-defined  areas. 
Models  are  available  in  Alberta  to  evaluate 
water  and  sediment  discharge  in  a post-mining 
situation.  SEDIMOT  II  (Sedimentology  Disturbed 
Modelling  Techniques)  is  a single  storm  model 
that  was  developed  specifically  for  the  design 
of  sediment  control  structures  in  watersheds 
disturbed  by  surface  mining  and  is  well  suited 
to  Alberta  conditions. 

* 33.  RRTAC  87-7: 

The  Use  of  Bottom  Ash  as  an  Amendment  to  Sodic 
Spoil.  S.  Fullerton.  83  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

The  report  details  the  use  of  bottom  ash  as  an 
amendment  to  sodic  coal  mine  spoil.  Several 
rates  and  methods  of  application  of  bottom  ash 
to  sodic  spoil  were  tested  to  determine  which 
was  the  best  at  reducing  the  effects  of  excess 
sodium  and  promoting  crop  growth.  Field  trials 

were  set  up  near  the  Vesta  mine  in  East  Central 
Alberta  using  ash  readily  available  from  nearby 
coal -fired  thermal  generating  station.  The 
research  indicated  that  bottom  ash  incorporated 
to  a depth  of  30  cm  using  a subsoil er  provided 
the  best  results. 


34.  RRTAC  87-8:  Waste  Dump  Design  for  Erosion  Control.  R.G. 

Chopiuk  and  S.E.  Thornton.  45  pp. 

DESCRIPTION:  This  report  describes  a study  to  evaluate  the 

influence  of  erosion  from  reclaimed  waste  dumps 
on  downslope  environments  such  as  streams  and 
rivers.  Sites  were  selected  from  coal  mines  in 
Alberta's  mountains  and  foothills,  and  included 
resloped  dumps  of  different  configurations  and 
ages,  and  having  different  vegetation  covers. 
The  study  concluded  that  the  average  annual 
amount  of  surface  erosion  is  minimal.  As 
expected,  erosion  was  greatest  on  slopes  which 
were  newly  regraded.  Slopes  with  dense  grass 
cover  showed  no  signs  of  erosion.  Generally, 
the  amount  of  erosion  decreased  with  time,  as  a 
result  of  initial  loss  of  fine  particles,  the 
formation  of  a weathered  surface,  and  increased 
vegetative  cover. 


35.  RRTAC  87-9:  Hydrogeology  and  Groundwater  Chemistry  of  the 

Battle  River  Mining  Area.  M.R.  Trudell,  R.L. 
Faught  and  S.R.  Moran.  97  pp, 

DESCRIPTION:  This  report  describes  the  premining  geologic 

conditions  in  the  Battle  River  coal  mining  area 
including  the  geology  as  well  as  the  groundwater 
flow  patterns,  and  the  groundwater  quality  of  a 
sequence  of  several  water-bearing  formations 
extending  from  the  surface  to  a depth  of  about 
100  metres. 


36.  RRTAC  87-10:  Soil  Survey  of  the  Plains  Hydrology  and 

Reclamation  Project  - Battle  River  Project  Area. 
T.M.  Macyk  and  A.H.  Maclean.  62  pp.  plus  maps. 

DESCRIPTION:  The  report  evaluates  the  capability  of 

post-mining  landscapes  and  assesses  the  changes 
in  capability  as  a result  of  mining,  in  the 
Battle  River  mining  area.  Detailed  soils 
information  is  provided  in  the  report  for  lands 


XT  1 1 


adjacent  to  areas  already  mined  as  well  as  for 
lands  that  are  destined  to  be  mined. 
Characterization  of  the  reconstructed  soils  in 
the  reclaimed  areas  is  also  provided.  Data  were 
collected  from  1979  to  1985.  A series  of  maps 
supplement  the  report. 

**  37.  RRTAC  87-11 : 

Geology  of  the  Highvale  Study  Site:  Plains 
Hydrology  and  Reclamation  Project.  A. 
Maslowski-Schutze.  78  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

The  report  is  one  of  a series  that  describes  the 
geology,  soils  and  groundwater  conditions  at  the 
Highvale  Coal  Mine  study  site.  The  purpose  of 
the  study  was  to  establish  a summary  of  site 
geology  to  a level  of  detail  necessary  to 
provide  a framework  for  studies  of  hydrogeology 
and  reclamation. 

**  38.  RRTAC  87-12: 

Premining  Groundwater  Conditions  at  the  Highvale 
Site.  M.R.  Trudell  and  R.  Faught.  83  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  presents  a detailed  discussion  of 
the  premining  flow  patterns,  hydraulic 
properties,  and  isotopic  and  hydrochemical 
character! sties  of  five  layers  within  the 
Paskapoo  Geological  Formation,  the  underlying 
sandstone  beds  of  the  Upper  Horseshoe  Canyon 
Formation,  and  the  surficial  glacial  drift. 

* 39.  RRTAC  87-13: 

An  Agricultural  Capability  Rating  System  for 
Reconstructed  Soils.  T.M.  Macyk.  27  pp. 

DESCRIPTION: 

This  report  provides  the  rationale  and  a system 
for  assessing  the  agricultural  capability  of 
reconstructed  soils.  Data  on  the  properties  of 
the  soils  used  in  this  report  are  provided  in 
RRTAC  86-2. 

**  40.  RRTAC  88-1: 

Eccles,  T.R.,  R.E.  Salter  and  J.E.  Green.  A 
Proposed  Evaluation  System  for  Wildlife  Habitat 
Reclamation  in  the  Mountains  and  Foothills 
Biomes  of  Alberta:  Proposed  Methodology  and 
Assessment  Handbook.  101  pp.  plus  appendix. 

DESCRIPTION: 

The  report  focuses  on  the  development  of 
guidelines  and  procedures  for  the  assessment  of 
reclaimed  wildlife  habitat  in  the  Mountains  and 
Foothills  regions  of  Alberta.  The  technical 
section  provides  background  documentation 
including  a discussion  of  reclamation  planning. 

XIV 


a listing  of  reclamation  habitats  and  associated 
key  wildlife  species,  conditions  required  for 
development,  recommended  revegetation  species, 
suitable  reclamation  techniques,  a description 
of  the  recommended  assessment  techniques  and  a 
glossary  of  basic  terminology.  The  assessment 
handbook  section  contains  basic  information 
necessary  for  evaluating  wildlife  habitat 
reclamation,  including  assessment  scoresheets 
for  15  different  reclamation  habitats,  standard 
methodologies  for  measuring  habitat  variables 
used  as  assessment  criteria,  and  minimum 
requirements  for  certification.  This  handbook 
is  intended  as  a field  manual  that  could 
potentially  be  used  by  site  operators  and 
reclamation  officers. 


**  41.  RRTAC  88"2:  Plains  Hydrology  and  Reclamation  Project:  Spoil 

Groundwater  Chemistry  and  its  Impacts  on  Surface 
Water.  M.R.  Trudell  (Compiler).  Alberta  Land 
Conservation  and  Reclamation  Council  Report 
#RRTAC  88-2.  135  pp. 

DESCRIPTION:  Two  reports  comprise  this  volume.  The  first 

"Chemistry  of  Groundwater  in  Mine  Spoil,  Central 
Alberta,"  describes  the  chemical  make-up  of 
spoil  groundwater  at  four  mines  in  the  Plains  of 
Alberta.  It  explains  the  nature  and  magnitude 
of  changes  in  groundwater  chemistry  following 
mining  and  reclamation. 

The  second  report,  "Impacts  of  Surface  Mining  on 
Chemical  Quality  of  Streams  in  the  Battle  River 
Mining  Area,"  describes  the  chemical  quality  of 
water  in  streams  in  the  Battle  River  mining 
area,  and  the  potential  impact  of  groundwater 
discharge  from  surface  mines  on  these  streams. 


Available  from:  Publication  Services 

Queen's  Printer 
11510  Kingsway  Avenue 
Edmonton,  Alberta  T5G  2Y5 


* A $5.00  fee  is  charged  for  handling  and  postage. 

**  A $10.00  fee  is  charged  for  handling  and  postage. 

A $20.00  fee  is  charged  for  handling  and  postage. 

N/A  Not  available  for  purchase  but  available  for  review  at  the  Alberta 
Environment  Library,  14th  Floor,  9820-106  Street,  Edmonton,  Alberta 
T5K  2J6. 


XV 


EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY 


The  ability  of  actinorhizal  shrubs  to  tolerate  inhospitable 
conditions  while  improving  soil  fertility  and  organic  matter  status  has 
led  to  increased  usage  of  these  plants  for  land  reclamation  and  amenity 
planting  purposes.  Silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  are  two  such  shrubs 
which  are  being  tested  as  potential  candidates  for  the  revegetation  of 
the  oil  sands  tailings  in  northeastern  Alberta. 

Associated  with  the  roots  of  silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry 
are  two  symbionts  - the  N2-fixing  actinomycete,  Frankia.  and  the 
vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  (VAM)  fungi.  Numerous  studies  have 
demonstrated  that,  particularly  in  nutrient  limited  conditions,  mycor- 
rhization  and  nodulation  can  result  in  significantly  better  plant  per- 
formance as  a consequence  of  improved  N and  P nutrition.  The  benefits 
conferred  on  the  host  by  the  symbionts  may  assume  even  greater  impor- 
tance in  the  revegetation  of  mine  tailings  which  are  notoriously 
nutrient-poor. 

In  addition  to  reducing  soil  fertility,  the  upheaval  and 
mixing  of  soil  during  the  mining  process  can  lower  Frankia  and  VAM 
inoculum  levels.  Both  soil  fertility  and  symbiont  inoculum  potential 
can  be  improved  by  introducing  an  organic  amendment  to  the  minespoil. 
Soil  reconstruction  on  the  oil  sands  tailings  is  facilitated  by  the 
application  of  muskeg  peat  which  is  stockpiled  on  the  site  for  reclama- 
tion purposes.  Alternatively,  if  woody  plants  are  raised  as  containe- 
rized seedlings,  they  can  be  inoculated  with  both  their  N2-fixing  and 
mycorrhizal  symbionts  prior  to  being  outplanted.  However,  before 
embarking  on  a large-scale  inoculation  program  which  will  ultimately 
raise  the  cost  of  producing  a seedling,  factors  such  as  plant  depen- 
dency on  the  symbionts,  the  level  of  Frankia  and  mycorrhizal  inoculum 
in  the  outplanting  soil  and  the  nodule/mycorrhizal  status  of  containe- 
rized seedlings  leaving  commercial  greenhouses  should  be  considered. 
With  this  in  mind,  a research  program  was  initiated  to  fulfil  the 
following  objectives: 


XVI 


1.  To  determine  the  mycorrhizal  affinities  of  various 
actinorhizal  shrubs  in  the  Fort  McMurray,  Alberta  region. 

2.  To  establish  a basis  for  justifying  symbiont  inoculation 
of  buffalo-berry  and  si  1 ver-berry.  Factors  investigated 
included:  i)  the  dependency  of  the  shrubs  on  their  mycor- 
rhizal and  N2-fixing  symbionts  as  expressed  in  plant 
performance  under  inoculated  and  uninoculated  conditions, 
ii)  the  Frankia  and  VAM  inoculum  levels  in  the  out- 
planting  soil  including  stockpiled  peat  on  the  Syncrude 
lease  and  soils  reconstructed  from  peat,  mineral  soil  and 
oil  sand  tailings;  iii)  rates  of  mycorrhi zation  and  nodu- 
lation  in  undisturbed  and  reconstructed  tailings  dyke 
soils,  and  iv)  the  mycorrhizal  and  nodule  status  of 
containerized  shrubs  raised  in  commercial  and  provincial 
nurseries . 

3.  To  develop  a growing  regime  for  the  greenhouse  production 
of  mycorrhizal,  nodulated  silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry . 

4.  To  conduct  a field  trial  on  reconstructed  soil  on  the 
Syncrude  site  to  critically  evaluate  the  growth 
performance  of  inoculated  silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry 
as  compared  with  their  uninoculated  counterparts . 

The  major  findings  are: 

JUSTIFICATION  FOR  INOCULATION 

1.  In  Alberta,  silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  are  strictly 
VA-mycorrhizal . Levels  of  VAM  colonization  in  roots  of 
field  collected  plants  can  be  as  high  as  60%  suggesting  a 
high  degree  of  symbiont  dependency  under  field  conditions. 

2.  Silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  are  highly  dependent  on 
their  symbionts  for  optimum  growth  as  evidenced  by  four 
(si  1 ver-berry)and  nine-fold  (buf falo-berry)  increases  in 
shoot  weights  when  seedlings  are  inoculated  with  Frankia 
and  VA-mycorrhizal  fungi. 


XVI  1 


3.  The  VAM  inoculum  potential  of  both  stockpiled  and  undis- 
turbed muskeg  peat  is  negligible  due  to  the  absence  of 
VAM  hosts. 

4.  Due  to  the  low  levels  of  VAM  inoculum  in  the  peat,  stock- 
piling has  no  significant  impact  on  VAM  propagule 
levels.  Vegetating  peat  stockpiles  with  VAM  hosts  such 
as  grasses  and  legumes  can  increase  VAM  infectivity  by 
10-12%  over  six  years.  Tailings  sand  amended  with  peat 
would  lack  VA-mycorrhi zal  inoculum  unless  the  peat  had 
been  vegetated  with  VAM  hosts  for  a substantial  length  of 
time. 

5.  Soil  from  mixed  woodlands  (spruce,  aspen,  pine)  has  the 
highest  VAM  and  Frankia  inoculum  potential  of  all  soils 
assayed  in  the  Ft.  McMurray  area.  Amendation  of  tailing 
sand  with  this  type  of  soil  would  greatly  improve 
symbiont  infectivity. 

6.  Growth  of  slender  wheatgrass  in  unfertilized,  stockpiled 
peat  is  stimulated  when  inoculated  with  mycorrhizal 
fungi,  suggesting  VAM  fungi  are  necessary  to  satisfy  the 
nutritional  demands  of  the  plant  when  grown  in 
P-deficient  peat. 

7.  Containerized  shrubs  grown  in  various  nurseries  in 
Alberta  and  B.C.  are  seldom  mycorrhizal  and/or  nodulated 
if  less  than  one  year  old.  This  means  the  majority  of 
actinorhizal  shrubs  are  symbiont-free  if  shipped  to  the 
buyer  v>/ithin  a year  of  planting.  Containerized  shrubs 
which  are  more  than  one  year  old  and  have  spent  time  in 
the  shadehouse  may  or  may  not  be  colonized  by  their 
symbionts . 

8.  Buf falo-berry  planted  in  reconstructed  soil  in  the  green- 
house do  not  become  mycorrhizal  or  nodulated  until  eight 
weeks  after  planting.  Since  rates  of  colonization  would 
be  expected  to  be  much  slower  in  the  field  than  in  the 


xvi  i i 

greenhouse  and  since  the  growing  season  in  the  oil  sands 
region  is  short,  it  is  doubtful  that  containerized  shrubs 
would  obtain  much  benefit  from  the  symbiosis  during  the 
first  growing  season  unless  artificially  inoculated. 

9.  Uninoculated  silver-berry  seedlings  outplanted  on  the 
Suncor  dyke  exhibited  relatively  rapid  mycorrhization 
(within  six  weeks  of  planting)  presumably  due  to  high  VAM 
inoculum  levels  resulting  from  the  predominance  of  VAM 
hosts  (grasses,  legumes)  on  the  dyke.  In  contrast,  nodu- 
lation  was  poor  caused  by  either  a lack  of  Frankia  inocu- 
lum in  the  soil  or  poor  root  growth  out  of  the  planting 
plug. 

10.  The  low  VAM/Frankia  inoculum  potential  and  the  slow  rates 
of  mycorrhization  and  nodulation  in  reconstructed  soil  on 
the  tailings  sand  dykes,  combined  with  the  high  depen- 
dency of  silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  on  their 
symbionts,  forms  a strong  basis  for  artificial 
inoculation  of  containerized  seedlings. 

GROWING  REGIME  FOR  PRODUCING  MYCORRHIZAL,  NODULATED  SEEDLINGS 

11.  In  order  to  produce  mycorrhizal,  nodulated  silver-berry 
and  buffalo-berry  seedlings  of  suitable  size  and  quality, 
fertilization  should  not  exceed  56  mg  N and  12  mg  P per 
application.  Fertilizer  concentrations  in  excess  of  this 
do  not  totally  eliminate  symbiont  colonization,  but 
mycorrhizal  and  nodule  development  is  severely  reduced. 
The  optimum  fertilization  regime  in  this  study  was 
200  mg  L~^  28-14-14  Plant  Prod  Soilless  Feed  applied 
twice  weekly. 

12.  Silver-berry  growth  is  significantly  better  in  150  cc 
containers  than  in  65  cc  containers.  As  soil  volume  is 
reduced  there  is  a concomitant  decrease  in  symbiont 
growth  response  so  that  inoculated  seedlings  in  the 
150  cc  containers  exhibited  a significant  growth  response 
whereas  those  in  65  cc  containers  did  not. 


XT  X 


13.  Seedlings  inoculated  with  woodland  soil  demonstrate 
better  mycorrhi zation  and  nodulation  and  a greater  growth 
response  at  26®C  than  at  16®C. 

14.  In  a Frankia  inoculum  trial,  the  best  sources  of  inoculum 
resulting  in  the  biggest  silver-berry  seedlings  with  the 
most  heavily  nodulated  root  systems  were  found  to  be  wild 
buffalo-berry  soil,  crushed  silver-berry  nodules,  and 
crushed  silver-berry  nodules  treated  with  polyvinyl 
pyrrolidine  to  reduce  oxidation  of  phenols  which  inhibit 
Frankia  growth.  Seedlings  inoculated  with  Frankia  pure 
culture  obtained  from  Rhizotec  Labs  in  Quebec  became 
heavily  nodulated  but  this  was  not  manifested  in  improved 
plant  growth.  Seedlings  inoculated  with  a pure  culture 
of  Frankia  isolated  from  buffalo-berry  failed  to  become 
nodulated  possibly  because  the  Frankia  strain  was  incom- 
patible with  silver-berry. 

15.  Mixing  a highly  infective  soil  into  the  planting  mixture 
appears  to  be  more  effective  at  promoting  symbiont 
development  than  applying  the  inoculum  as  a soil  slurry 
after  plant  establishment. 

16.  Mycorrhizal,  nodulated  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  of 
suitable  size  and  quality  can  be  obtained  by  planting 
them  in  150  cc  containers  filled  with  peat/vermicul ite 
(1/1  v/v)  which  has  been  supplemented  with  high  inoculum 
soil  (10-15%  by  volume),  and  fertilizing  them  twice 
weekly  at  a rate  of  200  mg  28-14-14  Plant  Prod 
Soilless  Feed.  Buffalo-berry  appears  to  be  more  N-deman- 
ding  than  silver-berry  and  may  require  a higher  fertili- 
zer concentration. 


XX 


c 

FIELD  TRIAL  TO  TEST  GROWTH  RESPONSE  OF  INOCULATED  SILVERBERRY 

AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

17.  Overwinter  mortality  was  higher  for  inoculated  shrubs 
than  for  uninoculated  shrubs.  Due  to  their  symbiotic 
condition,  the  inoculated  shrubs  may  have  had  greater 
stomatal  conductance  and  higher  rates  of  transpi ration 
than  the  uninoculated  shrubs  when  outplanted,  making  them 
more  susceptible  to  frost  damage.  It  is  possible  that 
inoculated  seedlings  require  a longer  period  of  hardening 
off  than  do  uninoculated  seedlings,  particularly  if  they 
are  to  be  outplanted  in  the  fall. 

18.  After  one  growing  season,  shoot  weights  of  inoculated 
silver-berry  were  three  to  seven  times  greater  than  those 
of  the  uninoculated  seedlings,  while  shoots  of  inoculated 
buffalo-berry  were  three  to  five  times  heavier  than  those 
of  their  uninoculated  counterparts . The  much  superior 
growth  performance  of  the  inoculated  seedlings  was 
continued  over  the  second  growing  season. 

19.  The  significant  growth  response  of  the  inoculated  shrubs 
aboveground  was  reflected  in  the  symbiont  status  below- 
ground where  nodule  and  mycorrhizal  development  was 
significantly  more  extensive  in  the  inoculated  plants 
than  the  uninoculated  plants  over  the  two  growing  seasons. 

20.  Shoot  production  appeared  to  be  heavily  dependent  on 
healthy  nodule  development  as  evidenced  by  the  highly 
significant  correlations  between  shoot  weights  and  nodule 
weights  (r  = 0.91,  0.97)  after  one  growing  season.  Shoot 
productivity  was  more  closely  related  to  nodule  status 
than  mycorrhizal  status  (r  = 0.63  and  0.58  for  shoot 
weight  versus  mycorrhizal  root  length  for  silver-berry 
and  buf faloberry,  respectively).  Also,  per  cent 
mycorrhizal  root  length  was  not  closely  correlated  with 
nodule  number  and  weight  suggesting  that,  in  the  field, 
other  factors  besides  mycorrhizal  status  may  strongly 
influence  nodulation. 


XXI 


21.  The  much  superior  growth  performance  of  inoculated  seed- 
lings compared  with  uninoculated  seedlings  over  two 
growing  seasons  provides  unequivocal  proof  that  pre-ino- 
culation with  mycorrhizal  and  N2-fixing  symbionts  can, 
in  the  case  of  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry,  result  in 
more  rapid  revegetation  of  oil  sands  tailings.  It  is 
strongly  recommended  that  containerized  silver-berry  and 
buf falo-berry  seedlings,  destined  for  reclamation  and 
possibly  forestry  sites,  be  inoculated  with  Frankia  and 
mycorrhizal  fungi  prior  to  outplanting. 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 


Page 

EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY  .......  ..........  xv 

TABLE  OF  CONTENTS xxi  1 

LIST  OF  TABLES xxv 

LIST  OF  FIGURES  .....  xxviii 

APPENDIX  TABLES xxix 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xxx 

1.  INTRODUCTION  1 

1.1  Objectives  4 

2.  STUDY  AREA  6 

3.  METHODS 9 

3.1  Mycorrhizal  Status  of  Woody  Shrubs  .........  9 

3.2  Justification  for  Inoculation  of  Containerized 

Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry  9 

3.2.1  The  Dependency  of  Silver-berry  and  Buf falo-berry 

on  their  Mycorrhizal  and  N2-Fixing  Symbionts  ...  10 

3.2.2  Levels  of  Mycorrhizal  Inoculum  in  Outplanting  Soil  . 11 

3.2.3  Growth  Characteristics  and  Mycorrhizal  Potential  of 

Undisturbed  Bog  Peat  and  Stockpiled  Peat 12 

3.2.4  Mycorrhizal  Potential  of  Revegetated  Dyke  Peat  ...  12 

3.2.5  Effect  of  VA  Mycorrhizal  Inoculation  on  Plant 
Performance  of  Slender  Wheatgrass  Grown  in  Stock- 
piled Peat  under  Fertilized  and  Unfertilized 

Conditions  13 

3.2.6  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Status  of  Containerized 
Shrubs  Planted  on  the  Oil  Sands  Tailings 

Reconstruction  Plots  .........  13 

3.2.7  Growth  Characteristics  and  Symbiont  Status  of  Woody 
Shrubs  Raised  in  Various  Commercial  Nurseries  in 

Alberta  and  British  Columbia  14 

3.2.8  Rates  of  Mycorrhization  and  Nodulation  in  Buffalo- 
berry  Grown  in  Woodland  Soil  and  Amended  Tailings 

Sand  in  the  Greenhouse 15 

3.2.9  Rates  of  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Development  in  Silver- 
berry  Outplanted  in  an  Undisturbed  Woodland  and  the 

Suncor  Tar  Island  Dyke  ................  15 

3.3  Development  of  a Growing  Regime  for  Greenhouse  Produc- 

tion of  Mycorrhizal,  Nodulated  Silver-berry  and 
Buffalo-berry.  ....................  16 


XX  i i i 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (continued) 

Page 

3.3.1  Fertilizer  Effects  on  Growth,  Nodulation  and 

Mycorrhizal  Development  in  Buffalo-berry  and 
Silver-berry  .........  ....  17 

3.3.2  Effect  of  Container  Volume  and  Inoculation  on  Growth 

of  Silver-berry 17 

3.3.3  Growth  of  Silver-berry  as  Influenced  by  Soil  Tempera- 
ture and  Symbiont  Inoculation 18 

3.3.4  Use  of  Soil,  Nodule  and  Pure  Culture  Inocula  for 

Introducing  N2-Fixing  Frankia  to  Containerized 
Silver-berry  ...............  19 

3.3.5.  Effect  of  Inoculation  Method  and  Inoculation  Time 
on  Nodule  and  Mycorrhizal  Development  of  Buffalo- 
berry.  21 

3.4  Field  Trial  to  Test  Growth  Response  of  Inoculated 

Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry  22 

4.  RESULTS.  .................  27 

4.1  Mycorrhizal  Status  of  Woody  Shrubs  .........  27 

4.2  Justification  for  Inoculation  of  Containerzied 

Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry  27 

4.2.1  The  Dependency  of  Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry 

on  their  Mycorrhizal  and  Na-Fixing  Symbionts  ....  27 

4.2.2  Levels  of  VA  Mycorrhizal  Inoculum  in  Various  Soils 

in  the  Fort  McMurray,  Alberta  Region 27 

4.2.3  Growth  Characteristics  and  Mycorrhizal  Potential 

of  Undisturbed  Bog  Peat  and  Stockpiled  Peat 29 

4.2.4  Mycorrhizal  Potential  of  Revegetated  Dyke  Peat  ...  31 

4.2.5  Effect  of  VA  Mycorrhizal  Inoculation  on  Plant 
Performance  of  Slender  Wheatgrass  Grown  in  Stock- 
piled Peat  Under  Fertilized  and  Unfertilized 

Conditions  .....  31 

4.2.6  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Status  of  Containerized 
Shrubs  Planted  on  the  Oil  Sands  Tailings 

Reconstruction  Plots  31 

4.2.7  Growth  Characteristics  and  Symbiont  Status  of  Woody 
Shrubs  Raised  in  Various  Commercial  Nurseries  in 

Alberta  and  British  Columbia  ...  34 

4.2.8  Rates  of  Mycorrhi zation  and  Nodulation  in  Buffalo- 
berry  Grown  in  Woodland  Soil  and  Amended  Tailings 

Sand  in  the  Greenhouse 37 

4.2.9  Rates  of  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Development  in 
Silver-berry  Outplanted  in  an  Undisturbed  Woodland 

and  the  Suncor  Tar  Island  Dyke 40 

4.3  Development  of  a Growing  Regime  for  Greenhouse 

Production  of  Mycorrhizal,  Nodulated  Silver- 

berry  and  Buffalo-berry 42 

4.3.1  Fertilizer  Effects  on  Growth,  Nodulation  and 
Mycorrhizal  Development  in  Buffalo-berry  and 
Silver-berry  42 


XXIV 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (concluded) 

Page 

4.3c2  Effect  of  Container  Volume  and  Inoculation  on 

Growth  of  Silver-berry  45 

4.3.3  Growth  of  Silver-berry  as  Influenced  by  Soil 

Temperature  and  Symbiont  Inoculation  ........  45 

4.3.4  Use  of  Soil,  Nodule  and  Pure  Culture  Inocula  for 

Introducing  Na-Fixing  Frankia  to  Containerized 
Silver-berry  ....................  48 

4.3.5  Effect  of  Inoculation  Method  and  Time  on  Nodule  and 

Mycorrhizal  Development  of  Buf falo-berry  ......  51 

4.4  Field  Trial  to  Test  Growth  Response  of  Inoculated 

Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry  ...........  51 

4.4.1  Pre-Planting  Symbiont  Status  of  Inoculated  and 

Uninoculated  Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry  ....  51 

4.4.2  Field  Performance  of  Silver-berry  After  One  and 

Two  Growing  Seasons  ................  52 

4.4.3  Field  Performance  of  Buf falo-berry  After  One  and 

Two  Growing  Seasons  ................  59 

4.4.4  Relationships  Amongst  Various  Parameters  Measured 

on  Inoculated  and  Uninoculated  Silver-berry  and 
Buffalo-berry  After  One  and  Two  Growing  Seasons  . . 63 

5.  DISCUSSION.  ...........  . 76 

5.1  Mycorrhizal  Status  of  Woody  Shrubs.  . 76 

5.2  Justification  for  Inoculation  of  Containerized 

Silver-Berry  and  Buffalo-Berry.  ..........  76 

5.2.1  The  Dependency  of  Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry 

on  their  Mycorrhizal  and  Na-fixing  Symbionts.  . . 76 

5.2.2  Levels  of  VA  Mycorrhizal  Inoculum  in  Various  Soils 
in  the  Oil  Sands  Region  and  Effects  of  Stockpiling 

on  VAM  Infectivity.  ................  77 

5.2.3  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Status  of  Containerized  Shrubs 

Raised  in  Various  Commercial  Nurseries  in  Alberta  and 
British  Columbia.  .................  79 

5.2.4  Mycorrhization  and  Nodulation  Rates  of  Buf falo-berry 

and  Silver-berry  in  the  Greenhouse  and  the  Field.  , 80 

5.2.5  Basis  for  Artificial  Inoculation  of  Containerized 
Buffalo-berry  and  Silver-berry  for  Outplanting  on 

Amended  Oil  Sands  Tailings. . 81 

5.3  Development  of  a Growing  Regime  for  Greenhouse 

Production  of  Mycorrhizal,  Nodulated  Silver-berry 

and  Buffalo-berry  .................  82 

5.3.1  Fertilization  Regimes  .........  82 

5.3.2  Container  Volume.  .................  83 

5.3.3  Temperature  ......  ........  84 

5.3.4  Frankia  Inoculum  Trials  ..............  84 

5.3.5  Growing  Regimes  for  Greenhouse  Production  of  Mycor- 
rhizal, Nodulated  Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry.  . 85 

5,4  Field  Trial  to  Test  Growth  Response  of  Inoculated 

Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry 85 

6.0  REFERENCES  CITED  .....  90 


XXV 


LIST  OF  TABLES 

Page 

1.  Mycorrhizal  status  of  selected  woody  shrubs 
growing  in  the  Fort  McMurray  and  Kananaskis, 

Alberta  regions.  ..................  28 

2.  Shoot  and  root  production  and  symbiont  development 

in  silverberry  and  buf falo-berry  grown  in  recon- 
structed soils  with  and  without  symbiont  inoculum.  . 29 

3.  Vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  (VAM)  infection  of 
slender  wheatgrass  grown  in  the  greenhouse  in 
various  soils  collected  from  the  Fort  McMurray, 

Alberta  region 30 

4.  Characteristics  of  slender  wheatgrass  grown  in 
peat  from  a muskeg  bog  and  peat  stockpiled  for 

eight  months 32 

5.  Root  and  shoot  production  by  slender  wheatgrass 

grown  in  the  greenhouse  in  fertilized  and  unfer- 
tilized dyke  peat 33 

6.  Shoot  and  root  production  by  slender  wheatgrass  grown 

in  stockpiled  peat  (50-100  cm)  inoculated  with  Glomus 
aqqreqatum  and  fertilized  or  left  unfertilized  ...  34 


7.  Mycorrhizal  and  nodule  status  of  shrub  species  planted 

on  the  RRTAC  oil  sand  tailings  reconstruction  plots  in 
September,  1984 35 

8.  Size  of  container-grown  and  bareroot  woody  shrubs 
obtained  from  four  commercial  nurseries  in  August, 

1985  36 

9.  Vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  (VAM)  status  and 
Frankia  nodule  development  in  woody  shrubs  sampled 

from  four  commercial  nurseries  in  1985 38 

10.  Rates  of  shoot  and  root  production,  mycorrhizal 

colonization  and  nodulation  by  buffalo-berry  grown 
in  undisturbed  woodland  soil  and  peat/clay  amended 
tailings  sand 39 

11.  Growth,  nodulation  and  VA-mycorrhi zal  development 
in  uninoculated  silver-berry  outplanted  in  the 
boreal  forest  and  Suncor  Tar  Island  Dyke  for  6 

and  12  weeks 41 


XX  vi 

c 

LIST  OF  TABLES  (continued) 

Page 

12.  Fertilizer  effects  on  growth,  nodulation,  and 

mycorrhizal  development  in  buffalo-berry  grown  in 
woodland  soil  and  peat/cl  ay-amended  tailings  sand.  . 43 

13.  Fertilizer  effects  on  growth,  nodulation,  and 

mycorrhizal  development  in  silver-berry  grown  in 
woodland  soil  and  peat/cl  ay-amended  tailings  sand.  . 44 

14.  Effect  of  container  volume  and  inoculation  on  shoot 

and  root  production  by  si  1 ver-berry . 46 

15.  Growth  of  silver-berry  as  influenced  by  soil  tempera- 

ture and  inoculation  with  mycorrhizal  and  Ns-fixing 
symbionts 47 

16.  Effect  of  soil  temperature  and  inoculation  on  mycor- 
rhizal and  nodule  development  in  silver-berry  grown 

in  a growth  chamber  for  13  weeks  ..........  49 

17.  Use  of  soil,  nodule,  and  pure  culture  inocula  for 

promoting  growth  and  nodulation  of  container-grown 
silver-berry  ....................  50 

18.  Use  of  soil  and  soil  slurry  for  promoting  nodulation 

and  mycorrhizal  development  in  container-grown 
buffalo-berry.  52 

19.  Nodule  and  mycorrhizal  development  in  container-grown 
buffalo-berry  inoculated  with  soil  slurry  at  various 

ages 53 

20.  Pre-planting  mycorrhizal  and  nodule  status  of  silver- 
berry  and  buffalo-berry  outplanted  in  the  University 
of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots  (with  and 

without  surficial  clay).  ..............  54 

21.  Plant  growth,  nodulation,  and  vesicular-arbuscular 
mycorrhizal  development  of  inoculated  and  uninocu- 
lated silver-berry  outplanted  for  1 year  in  the 
University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots 

at  the  Syncrude  site  ................  55 


XXV  i i 


LIST  OF  TABLES  (concluded) 


Page 

22. 

Plant  growth,  nodulation  and  vesicular-arbuscular 
mycorrhizal  development  in  inoculated  and  uninocu- 
lated silver-berry  outplanted  for  2 years  in  the 
University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots  at 
the  Syncrude  site.  . . 

56 

23. 

Plant  growth,  nodulation,  and  vesicular-arbuscular 
mycorrhizal  development  of  inoculated  and  uninocu- 
lated buf falo-berry  outplanted  for  1 year  in  the 
University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots  at 
the  Syncrude  site.  

62 

24. 

Plant  growth,  nodulation  and  vesicular-arbuscular 
mycorrhizal  development  in  inoculated  and  uninocu- 
lated buf falo-berry  outplanted  for  2 years  in  the 
University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots  at 
the  Syncrude  site.  ....  

68 

25. 

Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  for 
various  parameters  measured  on  silver-berry  grown 
for  1 year  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site.  . . . . . 

69 

26. 

Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  for 
various  parameters  measured  on  silver-berry  grown 
for  2 years  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site 

70 

27. 

Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  for 
various  parameters  measured  on  buffalo-berry  grown 
for  1 year  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site 

73 

28. 

Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  for 
various  parameters  measured  on  buf falo-berry  grown 
for  2 years  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site 

74 

29. 

Growing  regime  for  greenhouse  production  of 
mycorrhizal,  nodulated  silver-berry 

86 

30. 

Growing  regime  for  greenhouse  production  of 
mycorrhizal,  nodulated  buf falo-berry  ........ 

87 

XXV i 1 i 

c 

LIST  OF  FIGURES 

Page 

Ic  Map  showing  location  of  the  study  area  ......  7 

2.  Plot  arrangement.  ............  24 

3.  Shoot  heights  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated  silver- 
berry  outplanted  in  reconstructed  soil  for  two 

growing  seasons  ..................  57 

4.  Shoot  weights  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated  silver- 
berry  outplanted  in  reconstructed  soil  for  two 

growing  seasons  ..................  58 

5.  Nodule  development  in  inoculated  and  uninoculated 
silver-berry  outplanted  in  reconstructed  soil  for 

two  growing  seasons  .......  ....  60 

6.  Mycorrhizal  development  in  inoculated  and  uninocu- 
lated silver-berry  outplanted  in  reconstructed  soil 

for  two  growing  seasons  ..............  61 

7.  Shoot  heights  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated 

buf falo-berry  outplanted  in  reconstructed  soil  for 

two  growing  seasons  ................  64 

8.  Shoot  weights  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated 

buffalo-berry  outplanted  in  reconstructed  soil  for  two 
growing  seasons  ............  . 65 

9.  Nodule  development  in  inoculated  and  uninoculated 
buf falo-berry  outplanted  in  reconstructed  soil  for 

two  growing  seasons  ................  66 

10.  Mycorrhizal  development  in  inoculated  and  uninocu- 
lated buffalo-berry  outplanted  in  reconstructed 

soil  for  two  growing  seasons.  ...........  67 

11.  Linear  regression  of  shoot  weights  versus  nodule 

weights  for  one  year-old  silver-berry  .......  71 

12.  Linear  regression  of  shoot  weights  versus  nodule 

weights  for  one  year-old  buffalo-berry.  ......  75 


XXI  X 


APPENDIX  TABLES 


Page 

1.  Mycorrhizal  infection  of  slender  wheatgrass  grown  in 

undisturbed  muskeg  and  stockpiled  peat  (peat  stock- 
piled for  8 months)  ......  .o  ...  98 


XXX 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 


This  research  was  funded  by  the  Reclamation  Research  Technical 
Advisory  Committee  of  the  Alberta  Land  Conservation  and  Reclamation 
Council,  using  Heritage  Savings  Trust  Fund  monies.  The  cooperation  of 
Syncrude  Canada  Ltd.  and  Suncor  Inc.  for  providing  planting  sites  and 
aid  in  plot  establishment  is  gratefully  acknowledged.  In  particular, 
we  would  like  to  thank  Tony  Dai  and  Kim  McCumber  of  Syncrude  Canada 
Ltd.  for  their  help  and  advice  during  the  field  work.  The  support  and 
enthusiasm  for  this  study  demonstrated  by  Chris  Powter  and  Jim  Campbell 
of  the  Research  Management  Division  is  very  much  appreciated.  The 
authors  thank  the  following  for  providing  nursery  stock:  T,  Laidlaw 
(Laidlaw  Vegetation  Consulting  Ltd.),  B.  Hutchinson  (Whitecourt 
Mountain  Seedling  Nursery),  G.  Granger  (Alberta  Tree  Nursery  and  Horti- 
culture Centre),  C.  Jones  (Reid,  Collins  Nurseries  Ltd.),  and  B. 
Novlesky  (Syncrude  Canada  Ltd.).  Silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  seeds 
were  provided  by  the  Alberta  Forest  Service.  In  conclusion,  this  study 
would  not  have  been  possible  without  the  invaluable  technical  assis- 
tance provided  by  L.  Burton,  P.  Mazier,  C.  McBain  and  C.  Anderson  and 
the  statistical  analyses  provided  by  C.  Griffiths.  We  are  grateful  to 
Lynn  Ewing  and  Della  Patton  for  their  help  in  typing  and  organizing  the 
report. 


1 


1 . INTRODUCTION 

Actinorhizal  plants  are  non-leguminous , N2-fixing  plants 
whose  nodules  are  formed  by  the  actinomycete,  Frankia,  rather  than  by 
the  bacterium,  Rhizobium,  as  is  the  case  for  legumes.  They  are  peren- 
nial, woody  trees  or  shrubs  which  often  colonize  nutrient-poor,  margi- 
nal or  disturbed  habitats  such  as  sand  dunes,  wet  bogs,  dry  sandy  or 
gravelly  areas  and  mine  wastes  (Torrey,  1978).  They  have  the  ability 
to  fix  up  to  300  kg  atmospheric  nitrogen  ha~^  year"^  and, 
consequently,  are  seriously  being  considered  as  an  alternative  to 
nitrogen  fertilizer  as  a management  tool  for  intensive  forestry  in 
Canada  (Fortin  et  al.,  1984).  Alder,  in  particular,  has  been  shown  to 
significantly  improve  the  nitrogen  status  of  forest  soils  (Cot@  and 
Camir@,  1985;  Huss-Danell,  1986;  Malcolm  et  al.,  1985;  Tarrant  and 
Trappe,  1971;  Wheeler  et  al.,  1986)  and  minespoils  (Heilman  and  Ekuan, 
1982;  Tarrant  and  Trappe,  1971),  but  this  has  (Cot0  and  Camir(9,  1985; 
DeBell  and  Radwan,  1979;  Hansen  and  Dawson,  1982)  or  has  not  (Heilman 
and  Ekuan,  1982;  Malcolm  et  al.,  1985)  been  manifested  in  improved 
productivity  of  commercial  tree  species  in  mixed  plantings.  In  addi- 
tion to  improving  soil  nitrogen  levels,  actinorhizal  plants  ameliorate 
soil  temperature  and  moisture  conditions  through  the  accumulation  of 
organic  matter  resulting  from  leaf  and  root  litter  deposition  and 
decomposition.  The  ability  of  actinorhizal  shrubs  to  tolerate  inhospi- 
table conditions  while  improving  soil  fertility  and  organic  matter 
status  has  led  to  increased  usage  of  these  plants  for  land  reclamation 
and  amenity  planting  purposes  (Fessenden,  1979). 

The  actinorhizal  plants  which  are  native  to  Alberta  include 
green  alder  (Alnus  crispa  (Ait.)  Pursh),  river  alder  (A.  tenuifolia 
Nutt.),  snow  brush  (Ceanothus  velutinus  Dougl.  ex  Hook.),  silver-berry 
(Elaeaqnus  commutata  Bernh.  ex  Rydb.),  buffalo-berry  (Shepherdia 
canadensis  (L.)  Nutt.)  and  the  yellow  and  white  dryads  (Dryas 
drummondii  Richards.,  D.  octopetala  ssp.  hookeriana  [Juz.]  Hult.).  Of 
these,  green  alder,  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  are  being  tested  as 
potential  candidates  for  the  revegetation  of  oil  sands  tailings 
resulting  from  the  extraction  of  oil  from  the  oil  sand  deposits  located 
in  northeastern  Alberta.  This  report  is  concerned  exclusively  with 
silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry . 


2 


In  addition  to  having  the  N2-fixing  symbiont  associated  with 
their  roots,  both  silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  form  mycorrhizae  — 
the  mutual  symbiosis  between  specific  fungi,  in  this  case  vesicular- 
arbuscular  mycorrhizal  (VAM)  fungi,  and  the  plant  root.  The  fungus 
improves  the  phosphorus  nutrition  of  the  plant  by  exploring  a greater 
volume  of  soil  for  the  relatively  immobile  PO4  ion  than  the  plant 
root  itself  would  be  capable  of  doing,  while  the  fungus  benefits  by 
receiving  carbohydrates  from  the  plant.  The  potential  importance  of  VA 
mycorrhizae  in  enhancing  the  revegetation  of  minespoils  has  concen- 
trated primarily  on  forage  and  crop  species  (Khan,  1981;  Lambert  and 
Cole,  1980;  Zak  and  Parkinson,  1982,  1983)  with  woody  shrubs  receiving 
much  less  attention.  However,  due  to  the  coarse-rooted  nature  of  many 
woody  shrubs,  it  is  possible  that  these  species  are  more  dependent  on 
the  VA  mycorrhizal  symbiosis  than  fibrous-rooted  species  where  soil- 
root  contact  is  high  (Hayman,  1982).  This  would  explain  the  signifi- 
cant growth  enhancement  observed  in  many  woody  species  inoculated  with 
a wide  variety  of  VAM  fungi  (Furlan  et  al.,  1983,  Kormanik  et  al., 
1982;  Plenchette  et  al.,  1981;  Pope  et  al.,  1983)  and  the  much  improved 
growth  of ' VAM-inoculated  rabbit  brush  and  fourwing  saltbush  in  coal 
minespoil  (Aldon,  1978;  Lindsey  et  al.,  1977). 

Numerous  studies,  designed  to  clarify  the  interactions  between 
VAM  fungi  and  Rhizobium  in  legumes,  have  shown  that  mycorrhizal  infec- 
tion can  significantly  stimulate  nodulation,  nitrogenase  activity  and 
in  some  cases  foliage  N concentrations  (Ames  and  Bethlenfal vay,  1987; 
Azcon-Agui lar  and  Barea,  1981;  Barea  et  al , , 1980;  Barea  and 
Azcon-Agui lar,  1983;  Carling  et  al.,  1978;  Ganry  et  al.,  1982;  Green  et 
al.,  1983;  Redente  and  Reeves,  1981;  Smith  and  Daft,  1977;  Smith  et  al, 
1979).  It  has  been  demonstrated  that  both  nodule  initiation  and  N2- 
fixation  have  a high  P requirement  which  is  satisfied  by  the  mycor- 
rhizae resulting  in  significantly  greater  plant  productivity  (Smith 
et  al.,  1979).  With  the  exception  of  Rose  and  Youngberg  (1981),  who 
observed  that  the  actinorhizal  shrub,  Ceanothus  velutinus . exhibited 
greater  shoot  and  root  weights,  greater  number  and  weight  of  nodules 
and  more  nitrogenase  activity  if  colonized  by  both  the  mycorrhizal 
fungi  and  Frankia  than  if  colonized  by  Frankia  alone,  research  eluci- 
dating the  dependence  of  actinorhizal  plants  on  both  symbionts  has  been 


3 


lacking.  Considering  the  potential  importance  of  both  the  VAM  fungi 
and  Frankia  in  the  establishment,  survival  and  growth  of  actinorhizal 
shrubs  on  marginal  and  disturbed  habitats  such  as  mine  tailings,  it  is 
surprising  that  so  little  information  is  available  on  the  role  of  these 
symbionts  in  accelerating  the  revegetation  process. 

The  value  of  actinorhizal  shrubs  for  improving  the  fertility 
and  organic  matter  status  of  soils  which  are  prone  to  significant 
losses  of  N as  a result  of  intensive  forestry  practices,  has  led 
researchers  in  Quebec  to  develop  a program  for  isolating,  characteri- 
zing and  evaluating  the  effectiveness  of  Frankia  strains  from  green 
alder  (Normand  et  al.,  1984)  with  the  final  goal  being  large  scale 
inoculation  of  alder  on  a commercial  basis  (Perinet  et  al . , 1985). 
Subsequent  field  trials  with  inoculated  and  uninoculated  alders  demon- 
strated that,  over  the  long  term  (3  years),  inoculation  with  an  effec- 
tive strain  of  Frankia  significantly  improved  growth  of  three  species 
of  alder  (Burgess  et  al.,  1986).  Inoculation  with  mycorrhizal  fungi 
was  not  addressed  in  these  studies. 

In  Alberta  the  establishment  of  woody  trees  and  shrubs  on 
disturbed  sites  is  usually  accomplished  by  outplanting  containerized 
seedlings  which  have  been  raised  and  hardened  off  in  commercial  or 
provincial  greenhouse  operations.  The  use  of  containerized  seedlings 
offers  a good  opportunity  for  introducing  N2-fixing  and  mycorrhizal 
symbionts  to  the  plants  prior  to  being  outplanted. 

However,  before  embarking  on  a large-scale  inoculation  program 
which  will  ultimately  raise  the  cost  of  producing  a seedling,  a number 
of  factors  should  be  considered.  These  include  the  degree  of  depen- 
dency of  a plant  on  its  symbionts,  the  level  of  Frankia  and  mycorrhizal 
inoculum  in  various  soils  into  which  the  seedlings  will  be  outplanted 
and  the  effectivity  of  this  inoculum,  the  nodule/mycorrhi zal  status  of 
containerized  seedlings  leaving  commercial  greenhouses,  and  the  rates 
of  nodulation  and  mycorrhizal  colonization  of  seedlings  once  out- 
planted.  Prior  consideration  of  these  factors  will  determine  whether 
or  not  the  time  and  effort  required  to  develop  an  inoculation  program 
is  worthwhile.  Once  the  decision  is  made  to  enter  into  an  inoculation 
program,  it  becomes  necessary  to  develop  a growing  regime  for  rearing 
mycorrhizal,  nodulated  seedlings  of  an  acceptable  size.  For  this  the 


4 


optimum  nutrient  conditions  (fertilizer  rates),  soil  pH,  light  condi- 
tions, container  volume,  soil  temperature,  Frankia  and  mycorrhizal 
inoculum  source  and  method  of  inoculation  should  be  evaluated. 
Finally,  it  is  essential  that  field  trials  be  conducted  to  establish 
unequivocally  that  inoculated  seedlings  will  outperform  uninoculated 
seedlings  over  the  long-term  under  field  conditions.  On  the  basis  of 
the  foregoing  discussion,  research  was  conducted  to  fulfil  the 
following  objectives. 

1.1  OBJECTIVES 

1.  To  determine  definitively  the  mycorrhizal  affinities  of 
various  actinorhizal  and  other  woody  shrubs  in  the  Fort 
McMurray,  Alberta  region. 

2.  To  establish  a basis  for  promoting  the  symbiont  inocula- 
tion of  two  actinorhizal  shrubs,  buf falo-berry  and 

si  1 ver-berry.  Factors  which  were  investigated  include: 

i)  the  dependency  of  the  shrubs  on  their  mycorrhizal 
and  N2-fixing  symbionts  as  expressed  in  plant 
performance  under  inoculated  and  uninoculated 
conditions . 

ii)  the  Frankia  and  VAN!  inoculum  levels  in  the  soil  into 
which  the  shrubs  would  be  planted,  i.e.  peat  stock- 
piled on  the  Syncrude  lease,  soils  reconstructed 
from  peat,  mineral  soil  and  oil  sand  tailings  on  the 
tailings  dykes  and  woody  species  trial  plots  on  the 
Syncrude  lease. 

iii)  the  mycorrhizal  and  nodule  status  of  containerized 
shrubs  raised  in  commercial  and  provincial  green- 
houses. 

iv)  rates  of  mycorrhization  and  nodulation  in  undis- 
turbed and  reconstructed  tailings  dyke  soils. 

3.  To  develop  a growing  regime  for  the  greenhouse  production 
of  mycorrhizal,  nodulated  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry. 


5 


There  are  basically  two  approaches  to  the  development  of 
an  inoculation  program.  The  first,  termed  the  "high  tech" 
approach,  involves  the  isolation  of  species  or  strains  of 
VA  mycorrhizal  fungi  and  N2-fixing  Frankia  into  pure 
culture,  propagating  the  isolates  and  then  using  pure 
culture  inoculum  to  inoculate  containerized  seedlings. 
The  second,  the  "low  tech"  approach,  involves  mixing  field 
soil  with  a high  symbiont  inoculum  potential  into  the 
planting  mixture  prior  to  filling  and  planting  the 
containers.  Due  to  time  constraints  the  second  approach 
was  investigated  in  this  study.  This  entailed  testing 
such  factors  as  fertilization  regimes,  container  volume, 
soil  temperatures , inoculum  sources,  and  time  and  method 
of  inoculation. 

4.  To  conduct  a field  trial  on  reconstructed  soil  on  the 
Syncrude  site  to  critically  evaluate  the  growth  perfor- 
mance of  inoculated  silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  as 
compared  with  their  uninoculated  counterparts. 


6 


c 


2.  STUDY  AREA 

The  study  area  was  located  in  the  Athabasca  Oil  Sands  region 
near  Fort  McMurray  in  northeastern  Alberta  (Figure  1).  This  region  is 
situated  within  the  Mixedwood  Section  of  the  Boreal  Forest  Region 
(Rowe,  1972)  and  has  a gently  undulating  topography  with  sandy  soils 
dominating  the  upland  areas  and  wet  peatland  occurring  in  the  poorly 
drained  areas.  The  vegetation  consists  predominantly  of  white  spruce 
and  aspen  forest  with  jack  pine-lichen  woodlands  occurring  on  the  sandy 
upland  areas  and  black  spruce/tamarack  bogs  in  the  poorly  drained,  low 
lying  areas.  The  climate  is  cool  continental  character! zed  by  rela- 
tively short,  cool  summers  and  long  cold  winters.  Mean  annual  tempera- 
ture and  precipitation  in  the  Fort  McMurray  area  are  -0.2®C  and 
472  mm,  respectively.  Gray  luvisolic  soils  are  characteristic  of  the 
aspen-white  spruce  mixedwood  forests,  while  eluviated  dystric  brunisols 
predominate  in  the  jack  pine-lichen  woodlands.  More  detailed  informa- 
tion on  the  climate,  vegetation  and  soils  of  the  region  can  be  obtained 
from  Strong  and  Leggat  (1981)  and  Turchenek  and  Lindsay  (1982). 

Soils  for  greenhouse  growth  studies  and  VA  mycorrhizal  and 
Frankia  inoculum  screening  were  sampled  mainly  from  aspen-white  spruce 
mixed  woodland  in  close  vicinity  to  the  Mildred  Lake  Research  Facility 
(Figure  1)  and  from  reconstructed  soil  on  the  tailings  dyke  located  on 
the  Syncrude  Oil  Sands  Lease.  Samples  to  determine  the  effect  of 
stockpiling  muskeg  peat  on  VA  mycorrhizal  inoculum  were  removed  from  an 
eastern  larch/black  spruce/Labrador  tea/moss  peat  bog  and  from  the  NT-2 
peat  stockpile,  both  located  on  the  Syncrude  Lease,  The  stockpile  was 
300  m wide  and  3 m deep  and  was  8 months  old  when  sampled.  Rates  of 
nodulation  and  mycorrhi zation  of  silver-berry  were  determined  on  seed- 
lings outplanted  on  plots  established  on  the  Suncor  Tar  Island  Dyke 
facing  the  Athabasca  River  on  the  Suncor  Oil  Sands  Lease.  The  plots 
were  established  in  areas  which  had  been  revegetated  with  grass/legume 
mixtures  in  1971,  1974  and  1978. 

The  field  trial  to  evaluate  the  growth  response  of  inoculated 
silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  was  conducted  on  two  plots  established 
adjacent  to  the  RRTAC  soil  reconstruction-woody  plant  experimental  area 
on  the  Syncrude  Oil  Sands  Lease.  The  experimental  area  was  located  on 
a specially  prepared  pad  of  oil  sand  tailings  which  had  been  amended 


7 


Figure  1.  Map  showing  location  of  the  study  area  (excerpted  from 
Turchenek  and  Lindsay,  1982). 


8 


c 


with  various  amounts  of  muskeg  peat  and  surficial  overburden  clay. 
Further  details  regarding  the  plots  are  given  in  reports  prepared  by 
Hardy  Associates  (1983,  1984), 


9 


3.  METHODS 

3.1  MYCORRHIZAL  STATUS  OF  WOODY  SHRUBS 

Although  it  is  widely  accepted  that  grasses  and  the  majority 
of  herbaceous  plants  are  mycorrhizal  with  vesicular-arbuscular  (VA) 
mycorrhizal  fungi,  the  mycorrhizal  affinities  of  woody  shrubs, 
including  actinorhizal  shrubs,  are  less  well-known.  In  order  to 
establish  the  mycorrhizal  condition  of  silver-berry,  buf falo-berry  and 
various  other  shrubs  growing  in  the  wild,  the  following  survey  was 
conducted. 

Buffalo-berry  and  silver-berry  plants  were  sampled  from  the 
Vaartnou  reclamation  plots  near  the  Mildred  Lake  campsite,  from  a 
cutbank  near  the  Suncor  plant  and  from  a roadcut  near  the  University  of 
Calgary  Research  Station  in  the  Kananaskis  Valley.  In  addition, 
saskatoon-berry  and  cinquefoil  were  sampled  from  a cutline  near  the 
Mildred  Lake  campsite  and  the  Vaartnou  plots,  respectively.  Five 
replicate  plants  were  excavated  at  each  sampling  location,  the  roots 
were  washed,  and  only  those  roots  which  were  attached  to  the  stem  of 
the  host  species  in  question  were  assessed  for  mycorrhizal  develop- 
ment. The  root  systems  were  scanned  under  a dissecting  microscope  for 
ecto-mycorrhizal  development  and  subsamples  subsequently  cleared  and 
stained  for  the  detection  of  VA  mycorrhizae  (Phillips  and  Hayman,  1970). 

3.2  JUSTIFICATION  FOR  INOCULATION  OF  CONTAINERIZED  SILVER-BERRY 

AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

Before  undertaking  a widescale  inoculation  program,  a number 
of  factors  regarding  the  necessity  of  such  a program  should  be 
considered.  In  this  study  the  factors  which  were  investigated  include: 

i)  the  dependency  of  the  shrubs  on  their  Na-fixing  and 
mycorrhizal  symbionts,  i.e.  how  do  the  shrubs  perform  in  the  presence 
and  absence  of  their  symbionts  and  what  benefits  are  conferred  on  the 
host  by  the  symbionts  Woody  species  vary  in  their  symbiont  depen- 
dency, and  it  could  be  argued  that  if  they  are  not  highly  dependent 
(based  on  stimulation  of  root  and  shoot  production  in  the  presence  of 
the  symbionts)  there  is  less  of  a need  to  inoculate  them  prior  to 
outplanting. 


10 


c 


ii)  symbiont  inoculum  levels  in  the  soil  into  which  the  shrubs 
will  be  planted.  The  symbiont  inoculum  potential  is  determined 
primarily  by  the  degree  of  disturbance  of  a soil  and  by  the  host  plant 
species  present  in  a particular  site.  For  example,  massive  soil 
upheaval  characteristic  of  most  mining  operations  can  reduce  symbiont 
inoculum  potential  substantially,  while  the  dominance  of  non-host  plant 
species,  i.e.  those  which  are  neither  Na-fixing  or  VA  mycorrhizal, 
can  also  lead  to  a reduction  in  symbiont  inoculum.  Shrubs  would  be 
expected  to  benefit  most  from  pre-planting  inoculation  when  planted 
into  soil  lacking  symbiont  inoculum. 

iii)  VA  mycorrhizal  and  Na-fixing  nodule  status  of 
containerized  shrubs  prior  to  outplanting.  While  being  raised  in  the 
greenhouse,  containerized  plants  may  become  colonized  by  their 
symbionts  via  inoculum  in  the  planting  mixture,  the  water  or  the 
atmosphere.  If  this  is  the  case,  artificial  inoculation  may  be 
unnecessary. 

iv)  rates  of  mycorrhizal  colonization  and  nodulation.  Rapid 

colonization  by  the  symbionts  after  outplanting  will  ensure  that  the 
host  plants  will  derive  maximum  benefit  from  the  mycorrhizal/N2-f ixing 
relationship.  If  colonization  is  slow,  however,  inoculation  may  be 

necessary  to  accelerate  plant  establishment  and  growth.  This  would 
apply,  particularly,  in  northern  regions  where  the  short  growing  season 
could  reduce  symbiont  colonization  rates  to  such  a degree  that  the 
plant  would  not  begin  to  benefit  from  its  symbionts  until  the  end  of 
the  growing  season.  The  various  experiments  which  were  designed  to 
elucidate  the  preceding  factors  follow. 

3.2.1  The  Dependency  of  Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry  on  their 

Mycorrhizal  and  N2-Fixing  Symbionts 

Oil  sand  tailings  and  peat  from  the  Syncrude  NT2  stockpile 
were  mixed  based  on  11  and  5.5  cm  depth  equivalents  for  the  sand  and 
peat,  respectively.  A 3.5  cm  depth  equivalent  of  forest  soil  collected 
from  beneath  buf falo-berry  shrubs  growing  in  an  aspen  stand  near 
Mildred  Lake  and  containing  a high  symbiont  inoculum  potential  was 
added  to  half  of  the  oil  sands/peat  mixture.  This  represented  the 
inoculated  treatment.  The  uninoculated  treatment  was  identical  to  the 


11 


inoculated  treatment  with  the  exception  that  the  buf falo-berry  inoculum 
was  autoclaved  to  eradicate  the  symbionts.  Sections  of  sewer  pipe, 

20  cm  deep  and  7.7  cm  diameter,  the  bottoms  of  which  were  covered  with 
a layer  of  polyester  batting  and  a piece  of  fiberglass  screening,  were 
filled  with  soil  mixtures  from  each  treatment. 

Buffalo-berry  seeds  were  scarified  in  concentrated  H2SO4 
for  30  min  (King,  1980),  rinsed  in  cold  running  water  overnight  and 
germinated  on  moist  filter  paper.  Silver-berry  seeds  were  leached  in 
cold,  running  water  for  4 days  and  germinated  on  moist  filter  paper 
(King  et  al . , 1983).  One  germinant  of  each  species  was  planted  in  each 
of  10  replicate  cores  (total  = 40  cores)  and  the  cores  placed  in  the 
greenhouse  in  December  in  a random  arrangement.  Light  intensity  on 
clear  days  was  500  yEm  ^sec  ^ (198  W m 26  klx),  156  yEm  ^sec  ^ 

(67  W m”^,  9 klx)  on  cloudy  days  and  day  length  was  extended  to  20 
hours  with  a minimum  of  74  yEm  ^sec  ^ (20  W m 3.5  klx).  Temperatures 
were  generally  between  18  and  25°C,  but  occasionally  fell  to  5®C  at 
night,  and  were  30®C  during  the  day.  Plants  were  watered  twice 
weekly  without  any  additions  of  nutrients.  All  seedlings  were 

harvested  after  12  weeks. 

Shoots  were  removed,  dried  at  80°C  and  weighed.  Roots  were 
separated  from  the  soil,  washed  and  the  nodules  counted  and  weighed. 
Vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  assessments  were  determined  on  sub- 
samples by  the  method  of  Zak  and  Parkinson  (1982).  Remaining  roots 
were  dried  at  80®C  and  weighed. 

3.2.2  Levels  of  Mycorrhizal  Inoculum  in  Outplanting  Soil 

During  the  course  of  the  last  decade  numerous  soils  collected 
from  the  Fort  McMurray  region  have  been  assayed  for  their  VA-mycor- 
rhizal  inoculum  potential.  Assays  consisted  of  a baiting  technique  in 
which  slender  wheatgrass  germinants  were  planted  in  soil  or  peat  which 
had  been  well-mixed  and  packed  into  65  or  150  cc  Leach  Cone-tainers . 
The  plants  were  grown  in  the  greenhouse  and  were  not  fertilized.  After 
8 to  12  weeks,  the  roots  were  separated  from  the  soil,  cleared,  stained 
and  assessed  for  mycorrhizal  development  using  the  methods  given  in 
3.2.1.  The  various  soils  which  were  assayed  are  listed  in  Table  3 of 
the  Results  section. 


12 


c 


3.2.3  Growth  Characteristics  and  Mvcorrhizal  Potential  of  Undis- 
turbed Bog  Peat  and  Stockpiled  Peat 

Before  mining  the  oil  sands,  the  muskeg  peat,  which  often 
overlies  the  oil-bearing  sand,  is  drained,  stripped  and  stockpiled  for 
subsequent  revegetation  of  the  tailings  sand  dykes.  Little  is  known  of 
the  VA  mycorrhizal  status  of  undisturbed  peat  and  the  impact  of  stock- 
piling on  mycorrhizal  propagules.  The  plants  being  used  to  revegetate 
the  dykes  (e.g.  grasses,  legumes)  and  those  being  considered  for  recla- 
mation purposes  (e.g.  woody  shrubs  such  as  saskatoon-berry,  buffalo- 
berry,  si  1 ver-berry,  wild  rose  etc.)  are  VA  mycorrhizal  and  may  be 
heavily  dependent  on  their  mycorrhizal  associates  for  both  growth  and 
survival.  Therefore,  it  was  considered  essential  that  the  mycorrhizal 
potential  of  both  undisturbed  and  stockpiled  peat  be  investigated. 

Twenty-five  peat  samples  were  randomly  removed  from  each  of 
two  depths  (0-15  cm;  50-100  cm)  in  an  undisturbed  peat  bog  and  a peat 
stockpile  on  the  Syncrude  site  near  Fort  McMurray.  The  vegetation  on 
the  bog  was  predominantly  eastern  larch,  swamp  birch,  Labrador  tea  and 
feather  and  sphagnum  mosses  while  the  peat  stockpile,  which  was  8 
months  old,  was  largely  unvegetated.  Samples  were  removed  every  10  m 
along  a 250  m transect  on  each  site. 

Each  sample  was  thoroughly  mixed,  packed  into  a 65  cc  Leach 
Cone-tainer  and  planted  with  a slender  wheatgrass  germinant.  Plants 
were  grown  in  the  greenhouse  under  the  light  conditions  described  in 
3.1.1  and  received  no  fertilizer.  After  12  weeks,  shoot  weights,  root 
weights,  total  root  length  and  % VAM  infection  were  determined  using 
the  methods  described  in  3.2.1. 

3.2.4  Mvcorrhizal  Potential  of  Revegetated  Dyke  Peat 

The  University  of  Calgary  experimental  plot  on  the  Syncrude 
dyke  was  reclaimed  with  peat  from  a 6 year  old  stockpile  which  had  been 
revegetated  with  a grass  mixture.  Therefore,  it  was  decided  to  sample 
this  peat  to  determine  if  storage  time  and  presence  of  a VA  mycorrhizal 
host  had  changed  the  mycorrhizal  inoculum  potential. 

Five  peat  samples  (0-20  cm  deep)  were  randomly  removed  from 
the  northern  boundary  of  the  experimental  plot,  mixed  and  packed  into 
20,  65  cc  Leach  Cone-tainers , 4 per  sample.  Each  Cone-tainer  was 


13 


planted  with  a pre-germinated  slender  wheatgrass  seedling.  The  seed- 
lings were  then  divided  into  two  treatments — ten  seedlings  received 
Plant  Prod  Soilless  Feed  at  a rate  of  100  mg  L ^ 15-15-18  twice  per 
week  and  sequestrene-Fe  at  56  ppm  twice  per  week  while  the  remaining  10 
seedlings  received  only  deionized  water.  Plants  were  grown  in  the 
greenhouse  under  a 20h  daylength,  with  a minimum  of  3.5  klx  light 
intensity.  The  parameters  measured  after  9 weeks  included  shoot  and 
root  weights,  root  length  and  % VAM  colonization  using  the  methods 
described  in  3.2.1 . 

3.2.5  Effect  of  VA  Mycorrhizal  Inoculation  on  Plant  Performance  of 
Slender  Wheatgrass  Grown  in  Stockpiled  Peat  under  Fertilized 
and  Unfertilized  Conditions 

Preliminary  examination  of  plants  grown  in  peat  stockpiled  for 
8 months  revealed  that  there  was  a paucity  of  VAM  inoculum  in  this 
peat.  Therefore,  an  experiment  was  conducted  to  determine  if  the 
addition  of  VA  inoculum  would  improve  the  growth  of  slender  wheatgrass 
under  fertilized  or  unfertilized  conditions. 

Peat  from  the  50-100  cm  depth  of  the  8 month  old  NT-2  stock- 
pile was  bulked  and  separated  into  two  batches.  One  batch  was  mixed 
50/50  (v/v)  with  root/sand  inoculum  from  a Glomus  aggregatum  (a  common 
VA  fungus  having  a wide  distribution  in  Alberta)  pot  culture  while  the 
other  batch  was  mixed  50/50  (v/v)  with  autoclaved  root/sand  inoculum  to 
serve  as  a control.  Twenty  Leach  Cone-tainers  were  packed  from  each 
batch  and  one  pre-germinated  slender  wheatgrass  seedling  was  planted  in 
each  container.  Seedlings  were  grown  in  the  greenhouse  under  the 
conditions  outlined  in  3.2.4.  Five  seedlings  from  each  treatment 
(inoculated,  fertilized;  uninoculated,  fertilized;  inoculated,  unfer- 
tilized; uninoculated,  unfertilized)  were  sampled  when  the  plants  were 
4 and  10  weeks  old.  Shoot  and  root  weights  and  VA  mycorrhizal  develop- 
ment were  assessed  as  described  previously. 

3.2.6  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Status  of  Containerized  Shrubs  Planted 
on  the  Oil  Sands  Tailings  Reconstruction  Plots 

If  shrub  species  which  are  highly  dependent  on  their  symbionts 
for  growth  and  survival  are  used  for  reclamation  purposes,  both  the 


14 


symbiont  inoculum  potential  in  the  reconstructed  soil  and  the  symbiont 
status  of  the  shrubs  prior  to  outplanting  should  be  determined. 
Consequently,  it  was  decided  that  the  mycorrhizal  and  nodulation  status 
of  the  shrubs  outplanted  on  the  RRTAC  oil  sands  tailings  reconstruction 
plots  (pad  plots)  in  the  fall  of  1984  should  be  assessed. 

Wild  rose,  pin  cherry,  saskatoon-berry,  Canada  buffalo-berry 
and  silver-berry,  grown  in  either  the  Syncrude  or  Laidlaw  nurseries, 
were  sampled  in  August.  Twenty-five  plants  of  each  species  were 
randomly  selected  to  determine  plant  weights  and  mycorrhizal  and  nodule 
status.  All  plants  had  been  grown  in  150  cc  Spencer-Lemai re  Hillson 
book  containers.  Roots  were  washed  free  of  soil,  examined  for  nodules 
and  then  cleared,  stained  and  examined  for  VA  mycorrhizae  (3.2.1). 
Shoot  and  root  weights  were  determined  after  drying  at  80C. 

3.2.7  Growth  Characteristics  and  Symbiont  Status  of  Woody  Shrubs 

Raised  in  Various  Commercial  Nurseries  in  Alberta  and  British 

Columbia 

As  mentioned  previously,  containerized  shrubs  can  become 
mycorrhizal  or  nodulated  during  the  growing  and  hardening-off  phases  in 
the  greenhouse  and  shadehouse  via  inoculum  in  the  planting  mixture, 
water  or  atmosphere.  If  seedlings  become  heavily  mycorrhizal  or  nodu- 
lated prior  to  outplanting,  artificial  inoculation  may  not  be  neces- 
sary. Since  little  is  known  of  the  symbiont  status  of  shrub  species 
grown  in  commercial  greenhouses,  a survey  of  various  nursery-grown 
shrubs  was  conducted. 

Nine  species  of  woody  shrubs  were  sampled  from  the  Whitecourt, 
Laidlaw,  Oliver  and  Syncrude  nurseries  in  Alberta  and  the  Reid-CoHins 
nursery  in  British  Columbia  in  August,  1985.  Names  of  the  shrubs,  crop 
year,  container  size  and  number  of  seedlings  assayed  are  detailed  in 
Table  8 of  the  Results.  Shoot  heights  were  measured  for  some  of  the 
species,  while  shoot  and  root  weights  were  determined  for  all  plants 
after  drying  at  80C.  The  N2-fixing  shrubs  were  assessed  for  nodule 
numbers  and  weights.  Vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  status  of  all 
the  shrubs  was  determined  by  clearing,  staining  and  examining  under  a 
dissecting  microscope,  a 10%  subsample  of  the  total  wet  weight  of  each 
root  system. 


15 


3.2.8  Rates  of  Mvcorrhization  and  Nodulation  in  Buffalo-berry  Grown 
in  Woodland  Soil  and  Amended  Tailings  Sand  in  the  Greenhouse 
The  rate  of  mycorrhizal  and  nodule  development  from  indigenous 

soil  inoculum  may  determine  to  a large  degree  the  benefits  derived  by 
the  plant  from  its  symbionts  during  the  first  growing  season  after  out- 
planting.  This  applies  particularly  to  the  oil  sands  region  where  the 
short  growing  season  and  potentially  low  symbiont  inoculum  levels  in 
the  reconstructed  soil  on  the  tailings  dykes  may  result  in  such  slow 
colonization  rates  that  the  plants  do  not  benefit  from  their  symbionts 
until  the  end  of  the  growing  season.  Therefore  the  rates  of  infection 
may  determine  whether  or  not  pre-planting  inoculation  is  necessary. 
With  this  in  mind  a study  was  conducted  to  determine  the  rates  of 
mycorrhizal  and  nodule  development  of  buffalo-berry  planted  in  undis- 
turbed woodland  soil  and  amended  tailings  sand. 

Five  soil  samples  were  removed  from  the  forest  floor  of  a 
mixed  woodland  (poplar,  spruce,  buf falo-berry,  alder)  near  the  Mildred 
Lake  campsite.  The  roots  were  coarsely  chopped,  the  samples  were 
bulked  and  the  soil/root  mixture  packed  into  25,  150  cc  Leach 
Cone-tainers . The  procedure  was  repeated  with  0-15  cm  deep  recon- 
structed soil  (tailings  sand,  3%  peat,  12%  clay)  removed  from  the 
University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots  adjacent  to  the  RRTAC 
soil  reconstruction  site.  Buf falo-berry  seed  was  stratified  and  germi- 
nated as  described  previously  (3.2.1)  and  one  germinant  planted  in  each 
container.  Plants  were  grown  in  the  greenhouse  under  the  conditions 
outlined  in  3.2.1  and  were  watered  with  deionized  water  when  required. 
At  2,  4,  8,  12,  and  20  weeks  after  planting,  5 seedlings  were  destruc- 
tively sampled  and  shoot  and  root  weights,  % mycorrhizal  colonization 
and  nodule  weights  measured  using  the  methods  described  in  3.2.1. 

3.2.9  Rates  of  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Development  in  Silver-berry 
Outplanted  in  an  Undisturbed  Woodland  and  the  Suncor  Tar 
Island  Dyke 

This  study  was  conducted  to  gain  some  insight  into  the  rates 
of  symbiont  colonization  under  field  conditions. 

Silver-berry  seed  was  stratified  and  germinated  using  the 
technique  described  in  3.2.1.  Germinants  were  planted  in  autoclaved 


16 


peat/vermiculite  (50/50,  v/v)  in  150  cc  containers.  Plants  were  grown 
in  the  greenhouse  for  2 months  using  the  light  conditions  described  in 
3.2.1.  Seedlings  were  fertilized  with  200  mg  28-14-14  twice  weekly  and 
flushed  with  deionized  water  between  fertilizer  applications.  Prior  to 
outplanting,  seedlings  were  hardened  off  outdoors  for  2 weeks  without 
any  fertilization. 

Three  10m  x 10m  plots  were  established  on  the  Suncor  Tar 
Island  Dyke  in  areas  which  had  been  revegetated  with  grass/legume 
mixtures  in  1971,  1974  and  1978.  Fertilization  of  the  plots  had  been 
discontinued  in  1979.  Seedlings  were  planted  in  June,  1985.  In  each 
plot,  50  seedlings  were  planted  at  Im  intervals  in  5 rows.  The  rows 
were  2m  apart,  10  seedlings  per  row.  The  procedure  was  repeated  in  one 
additional  plot  established  in  an  undisturbed  mixed  woodland  (poplar, 
pine,  spruce,  wild  rose,  grasses  etc.)  located  near  the  Mildred  Lake 
campsite. 

At  6 and  12  weeks  after  planting,  10  seedlings  were  randomly 
sampled  from  each  plot,  2 seedlings  per  row.  Shoot  and  root  weights, 
root  growth  out  of  the  planting  plug,  nodule  weights  and  mycorrhizal 
development  were  measured  for  each  plant  using  the  methods  described  in 
3.2.1.  Survival  was  measured  at  the  6 week  sample  time. 

3.3  DEVELOPMENT  OF  A GROWING  REGIME  FOR  GREENHOUSE  PRODUCTION  OF 

MYCORRHIZAL,  NODULATED  SILVER-BERRY  AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

If,  based  on  the  factors  discussed  in  3.2,  actinorhizal  seed- 
lings would  benefit  significantly  from  being  colonized  by  their 
symbionts  prior  to  being  outplanted,  it  may  become  necessary  to  develop 
a program  for  inoculating  containerized  plants  in  the  greenhouse  or  the 
shadehouse.  There  are  many  factors  which  are  important  in  achieving 
successful  inoculation;  those  investigated  in  this  research  program 
included  fertilizer  regimes,  growing  temperatures,  container  volume, 
inoculum  source,  and  time  and  method  of  inoculation.  Details  of  the 
various  experiments  follow. 


17 


3.3.1  Fertilizer  Effects  on  Growth.  Nodulation  and  Mvcorrhizal 

Development  in  Buffalo-berry  and  Silver-berry 

Ten  random  forest  floor  samples  were  removed  from  a mixed 
woodland  (aspen  poplar,  white  spruce,  wild  rose,  buffalo-berry, 
grasses,  herbs)  located  near  the  Mildred  Lake  campsite.  An  additional 
10  samples  were  removed  from  plot  2 (tailings  sand  amended  with  11  cm 
(3%  organic  C)  muskeg  peat  and  2.9  cm  (12%  clay)  surficial  overburden 
clay)  in  the  University  of  Calgary  reclamation  site  (pad  plot  study). 
Each  sample  was  subsampled  and  the  subsamples  for  each  soil  type 
bulked.  Forty  containers  were  packed  for  each  soil  type  and  planted 
with  either  silver-berry  or  buf falo-berry  which  had  been  scarified  and 
germinated  as  described  previously.  Five  replicates  of  each  species  in 
each  soil  type  were  subjected  to  one  of  the  following  four  fertilizer 
regimes:  no  fertilizer,  100  mg  L 200  mg  L ^ and  400  mg  L ^ 

28-14-14  Plant  Prod  Soilless  Feed.  Fertilizer  applications  were  made 
twice  weekly  and  plants  were  flushed  with  deionized  water  between 
applications  to  remove  excess  fertilizer  salts.  Plants  were  raised  in 
the  greenhouse  in  conditions  similar  to  those  described  in  3.2.4. 

After  20  weeks  shoot  and  root  weights  after  drying  at  80®C, 
nodule  wet  weight  and  % root  length  colonized  by  mycorrhizal  fungi  were 
determined  for  each  seedling  using  the  methods  described  previously. 

3.3.2  Effect  of  Container  Volume  and  Inoculation  on  Growth  of 

Silver-berry 

. Silver-berry  seed  was  germinated  as  described  in  3.2.1. 
Germinants  were  planted  in  65  cc  and  150  cc  Cone-tainers  (Ray  Leach, 
Canby,  OR)  filled  with  50/50  (v/v)  autoclaved  (sterilized)  peat/ 
vermiculite  growing  medium  treated  with  autoclaved  (control  treatment) 
or  unautoclaved  VAM  inoculum  (inoculated  treatment).  The  inoculum  was 
collected  from  beneath  buffalo-berry  shrubs  in  a mixed  woodland  near 
the  Mildred  Lake  campsite  and  was  added  to  the  planting  mixture  at  a 
rate  of  10%  by  volume.  The  seedlings  were  grown  in  the  greenhouse 
(daylength  extended  to  20h  with  6ro-1ux  lights;  minimum  light  intensity 
3.5  klx)  and  received  200  mg  L~^  15-15-18  Plant  Prod  Soilless  Feed 
once  weekly  during  the  first  4 weeks  of  growth  and  twice  weekly  for  the 
remaining  16  weeks.  Excess  fertilizer  was  flushed  out  with  deionized 


18 


c 


water  between  fertilizer  applications.  There  were  10  replicates  for 
each  of  the  uninoculated  and  inoculated  treatments  in  each  container 
size  category. 

Half  of  the  seedlings  in  each  treatment  (i.e.  5 replicates) 
were  harvested  at  12  weeks  and  the  remainder  at  20  weeks.  Shoot 
weight,  root  weight,  nodule  and  mycorrhizal  status  were  determined  at 
each  sample  time.  Mycorrhizal  status  was  assessed  by  the  methods  of 
Phillips  and  Hayman  (1970)  and  Zak  and  Parkinson  (1982). 

3.3.3  Growth  of  Silver-berry  as  Influenced  by  Soil  Temperature  and 

Symbiont  Inoculation 

Silver-berry  was  stratified  and  germinated  as  described 
previously  (3.2.1).  Leach  Cone-tainers  (150cc)  were  filled  with  soil 
mixtures  belonging  to  each  of  the  following  four  treatments: 

i)  uninoculated  control  - autoclaved  peat/vermicul ite 
(50/50,  v/v)  amended  with  autoclaved  soil  (20%  by  volume) 
from  a Mildred  Lake  mixed  woodland. 

ii)  woodland  soil  inoculum  - as  above  with  the  exception  that 
the  woodland  soil  was  not  autoclaved, 

iii)  silver-berry  soil  inoculum  - as  above  with  the  exception 
that  soil  inoculum  originated  from  beneath  silver-berry 
planted  by  Vaartnou  in  a reclamation  plot  near  the 
Mildred  Lake  camp. 

iv)  VAM  pot  culture  inoculum  - as  above  but  using  Glomus 
aqqreqatum  inoculum.  Glomus  aqqreqatum,  a VAM  fungus 
indigenous  to  Alberta,  had  been  maintained  in  pure 
culture  in  the  greenhouse  on  silver-berry  planted  in 
autoclaved  peat/vermicul ite.  The  inoculum  consisted  of 
pot  culture  soil  and  chopped  silver-berry  roots  con- 
taining the  fungus. 

Half  the  seedlings  were  grown  in  a growth  chamber  programmed 
to  maintain  a constant  temperature  of  26®C  in  the  root  zone  while  the 
other  half  were  placed  in  a chamber  programmed  to  maintain  a 16®C  root 
zone.  The  experimental  temperatures  were  based  on  soil  temperatures 
measured  in  the  University  of  Calgary  greenhouse.  These  generally  fell 
in  the  range  of  20  to  30®C  with  extremes  at  15®  and  40®C.  Day 


19 


length  was  set  at  18  h and  the  air  temperature  was  24®C  day/26®C  night 
in  the  26®C  chamber  and  11®C  day/16®C  night  in  the  16®C  chamber. 

Light  intensity  25  cm  from  the  lights  was  180  yE  m~^  sec~^ 

(170  w m~^,  30  klx)  in  the  26®C  chamber  and  135  yE  m~^  sec~^ 

(170  w m~^,  21  klx)  in  the  16®C  chamber.  Fertilizer  (28-14-14 

Plant  Prod  Soilless  Feed)  was  applied  twice  weekly  at  a rate  of 
100  mg  beginning  2 weeks  after  planting.  Excess  fertilizer  was 
leached  out  with  deionized  water  between  fertilizer  applications. 
There  were  10  replicates/inoculum  treatment/temperature. 

Seedlings  were  harvested  when  13  weeks  old.  Shoot  height, 
root  collar  diameter,  and  shoot  weights  after  drying  at  80  C,  were 
measured.  Nodule  number  and  weight  were  determined  for  the  whole  root 
system  while  root  length  colonized  by  VAM  fungi  was  estimated  from  a 
10%  subsample  of  the  total  root  weight.  Roots  were  cleared  and  stained 
according  to  Phillips  and  Hayman  (1970)  and  mycorrhizal  infection  quan- 
tified by  the  methods  of  Zak  and  Parkinson  (1982).  Roots  not  used  for 
VAM  quantification  were  dried  at  80®C  and  used  to  estimate  total  root 
weights . 

3.3.4  Use  of  Soil,  Nodule  and  Pure  Culture  Inocula  for  Introducinq 
Na-Fixinq  Frankia  to  Containerized  Silver-berry 
There  are  numerous  methods  for  introducing  Frankia  into 
containerized  silver-berry  seedlings  in  the  greenhouse;  however,  the 
methods  vary  in  their  practicality  and  the  efficiency  with  which  the 
inoculum  becomes  established.  This  study  was  conducted  to  determine 
the  most  effective  method  for  inoculating  actinorhizal  shrubs  on  a 
relatively  large-scale  basis. 

Silver-berry  seed  was  stratified  and  germinated  as  discussed 
previously.  The  planting  mixture  consisted  of  autoclaved  peat/ 
vermiculite  (50/50,  v/v)  inoculated  as  follows: 
i)  No  inoculum  - control 

ii)  Frankia  pure  culture  - Frankia  inoculum  specific  for 
silver-berry  was  purchased  from  Rhizotec  Laboratories  Inc. 
in  Quebec.  Fifty  milliliters  of  the  inoculum  were  diluted 
in  150  ml  deionized  water  and  applied  to  15,  7 week  old 
silver-berry  seedlings  at  a rate  of  10-15  ml/plant. 


20 


iii)  Frankia  pure  culture  - Frankia  culture  SCN  10a  was  kindly 
provided  by  Dr.  M.  Lalonde,  Faculty  of  Forestry,  Laval 
University,  Quebec.  The  culture  was  originally  isolated 
from  Shepherdia.  Frankia  was  cultured  in  Qmod  media 
(Quispel,  1960  modified  by  Carpenter  and  Robertson,  1983) 
for  3.5  months  and  then  inoculated  with  a pipette  into  the 
root  region  of  each  of  15,  7 week  old  silver-berry  at  a 
rate  of  10  ml  of  Frankia  Qmod  culture/seedling. 

iv)  Soil  slurry  A - soil  from  the  root  region  of  a heavily 
nodulated  silver-berry  seedling  outplanted  on  the 
University  of  Calgary  reclamation  plot  on  the  Syncrude  site 
for  1 year  was  well-mixed  and  a 25  g subsample  placed  in 
160  ml  deionized  water.  The  soil/water  slurry  was  stirred 
for  2 min  and  inoculated  with  a pipette  into  the  root 
region  of  15,  7 week  old  silver-berry  seedlings  at  a rate 
of  10  ml/container. 

v)  Soil  slurry  B - Twenty-five  grams  of  forest  floor  soil  from 
beneath  buffalo-berry  in  a mixed  poplar-spruce  woodland 
located  near  the  Mildred  Lake  camp  was  mixed  into  170  ml 
deionized  water  and  blended  for  2 min  at  10,000  rpm.  The 
soil  slurry  was  then  injected  into  each  seedling  as 
described  in  iv). 

vi)  Nodule  inoculum  A - Fresh  nodules  were  picked  from  the 
roots  of  one  year  old  silver-berry  shrubs  which  had  been 
planted  in  the  University  of  Calgary  reclamation  plots 
(RRTAC  pad  plot)  on  the  Syncrude  site.  Approximately  6.4  g 
wet  nodules  were  washed  in  deionized  water  on  a 1 mm  mesh 
sieve,  crushed  to  a thick  paste  in  a mortar,  and  suspended 
in  150  ml  deionized  water.  Ten  milliliters  of  nodule/water 
slurry  were  then  inoculated  into  7 week  old  silver-berry 
seedlings  as  described  in  iv). 

vii)  Nodule  inoculum  B - Nodules  were  collected  from  silverberry 
shrubs  planted  by  Vaartnou  in  a reclamation  site  situated 
near  the  Mildred  Lake  camp.  Many  of  the  nodules  were  found 
associated  with  roots  permeating  rotten  wood  buried  in  the 
sandy  soil.  Approximately  6.3  g wet  weight  nodules  were 


21 


washed,  crushed  and  suspended  in  deionized  water  as 
described  in  vi).  The  nodule  slurry  was  inoculated  into 
containerized  silver-berry  following  the  method  described 
in  i v) . 

viii)  Nodule  inoculum  C - Fresh  nodules  were  collected  from  the 
same  source  as  for  vi).  Approximately  6 g of  wet  nodules 
were  rinsed  3 times  in  deionized  water  and  then  mashed  in  a 
mortar  until  they  formed  a thick  paste.  The  nodule  paste 
was  then  suspended  in  polyvinyl  pyrrolidine-phosphate 
buffer  solution  (a  treatment  which  reduces  oxidation  of 
phenols  which  appear  to  inhibit  the  growth  of  Frankia, 
Loomis  and  Battaille,  1966),  shaken  for  1 min  and 
centrifuged  for  10  min  at  5000  rpm  at  20°C.  The 
supernatent  was  decanted  and  the  procedure  repeated  3 
times.  The  resultant  nodule  pellets  were  resuspended  in 
170  ml  deionized  water  and  injected  into  containerized 
silver-berry  seedlings  as  described  above. 

The  seedlings  were  grown  in  the  greenhouse  under  the 
conditions  detailed  in  3.3.2.  Two  weeks  after  planting  the  seedlings 
began  receiving  15-15-18  Plant  Prod  Soilless  Feed  fertilizer  at  a rate 
of  100  mg  twice  weekly.  Excess  fertilizer  was  flushed  out  with 
deionized  water  between  fertilizer  applications.  The  seedlings  were 
grown  for  18  weeks  after  which  height,  root  collar  diameter,  shoot 
weight,  root  weight,  nodule  number  and  nodule  wet  weight  were  deter- 
mined for  each  replicate  using  the  methods  described  previously. 

3.3.5.  Effect  of  Inoculation  Method  and  Inoculation  Time  on  Nodule 
and  Mvcorrhizal  Development  of  8uf falo-berry 
This  study  was  performed  to  determine  if  inoculum  soil  mixed 
into  the  planting  mixture  was  a more  effective  means  of  introducing 
inoculum  and  promoting  symbiont  development  than  applying  the  inoculum 
as  a soil  slurry.  Also,  the  timing  of  inoculum  application  was  tested 
by  inoculating  seedlings  of  various  ages. 

8uf falo-berry  seed  was  scarified  and  germinated  as  described 
previously  with  the  exception  that  seed  was  treated  with  sulphuric  acid 


22 


c 


for  40  rather  than  30  minutes.  The  germinants  were  planted  according 
to  the  following  treatments: 

i)  10  seedlings  were  planted  in  sterilized  peat/vermiculite 

ii)  10  seedlings  were  planted  in  peat/vermiculite  which  had 
been  amended  with  mixed  forest  (Mildred  Lake  camp  vici- 
nity) floor  soil  at  a rate  of  10%  by  volume, 

iii)  10  seedlings  were  planted  in  peat/vermiculite  and  treated 
with  a mixed  forest  soil/water  slurry.  Approximately 
18  g of  forest  soil  (same  as  that  used  in  ii)  was  mixed 
with  120  ml  deionized  water,  blended  at  10,000  rpm  for 
2 min  and  applied  to  each  seedling  at  a rate  of  10  ml/ 
container. 

iv)  40  seedlings  were  planted  in  peat/vermiculite  and  10 
seedlings  were  treated  as  described  above  (iii)  when  they 
were  2,  3,  4 and  5 weeks  old. 

Seedlings  were  grown  in  a growth  chamber  programmed  for  an 
18  hour  day/6  hour  night.  Light  intensity  was  measured  at 
420  yE  m~^  (54  klx  or  330  W m~^).  After  10  weeks  the  seedlings  were 
transferred  to  the  greenhouse  where  daylength  was  extended  to  20  hours 
and  light  intensities  were  in  the  vicinity  of  207  yE  m~^  (39.6  klx, 

255  W m~^).  Fertilizer  was  applied  at  a rate  of  200  mg  L~^  28-14-14 
Plant  Prod  Soilless  Feed  once  weekly  for  the  first  7 weeks  and  was 
increased  to  400  mg  L ^ twice  weekly  thereafter.  The  seedlings  were 
harvested  after  17  weeks  and  assessed  for  shoot  height,  branching, 
shoot  weight,  root  weight,  nodule  weight  and  mycorrhizal  root  length  as 
per  the  methods  discussed  previously. 

3.4  FIELD  TRIAL  TO  TEST  GROWTH  RESPONSE  OF  INOCULATED  SILVER-BERRY 

AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

In  order  to  determine  if  the  development  of  an  inoculation 
program  is  worthwhile,  a field  trial  to  assess  the  growth  response  of 
inoculated  and  uninoculated  plants  should  be  conducted.  If  inoculation 
confers  few  benefits  on  the  plant,  in  terms  of  growth  and  survival, 
inoculation  of  containerized  shrubs  prior  to  outplanting  may  be 
unnecessary.  Therefore,  a study  was  conducted  to  determine  the  effect 
of  inoculating  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  with  soil  containing  both 


23 


VA  mycorrhizal  and  Frankia  inoculum  on  plant  growth  and  symbiont 
development  under  field  conditions.  The  seedlings  were  outplanted  on 
two  reconstructed  soils,  one  amended  with  peat  and  one  amended  with 
peat  and  clay. 

The  two  University  of  Calgary  plots  were  located  on  the  east 
side  of  the  RRTAC  soil  reconstruction-woody  plant  experimental  area  on 
a specially  prepared  pad  of  oil  sand  tailings  from  the  Syncrude  Canada 
Ltd.  extraction  plant  (Figure  2).  The  two  soil  treatments,  mixed  to  a 
depth  of  20  cm,  were  the  application  of  (1)  11  cm  (3%  organic  C)  of 
muskeg  peat  (P-1)  and  (2)  11  cm  of  muskeg  peat  plus  2.9  cm  (12%  clay) 
of  surficial  overburden  clay  (P-2),  The  plots  were  12  x 44  m with 
buffer  strips  on  all  sides  leaving  10  x 40  m for  planting.  The  plots 
were  constructed  by  Hardy  Associates  in  June  1984.  The  muskeg  peat  was 
from  the  Syncrude  NT-2  stockpile  and  the  clay  from  the  0-pit  located 
close  to  mixed  aspen  woodland.  The  clay  was  from  a depth  of 
approximately  1 to  3 m and  consisted  of  39%  clay,  29%  silt  and  32%  sand 
(Hardy  Associates,  1983).  Both  plots  were  fertilized  with  0-45-0  rock 
phosphate  at  a rate  of  112  kg  ha  ^ and  all  amendments  thoroughly 
mixed  into  the  top  20  cm  of  sand  with  a Madge  Rotoclear  machine. 
Further  details  on  plot  construction  are  given  in  reports  by  Hardy 
Associates , 

Each  10  X 40  m plot  was  staked  to  delineate  40  rows  with  20 
planting  positions  per  row.  This  resulted  in  1 m spacing  between  rows 
and  0.5  m spacing  within  rows.  Provisions  were  made  to  accommodate  a 
total  of  10  treatments  per  plot,  each  treatment  with  4 randomly 
assigned  rows  (i.e.  20  plants/row  x 4 rows  = 80  replicates).  The  plant 
species  used  in  the  trial  were  si  1 ver-berry,  buffalo-berry,  green  alder 
and  jack  pine.  Only  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  will  be  discussed 
here. 

Silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  seed  were  scarified  and  germi- 
nated as  outlined  previously.  The  germinants  were  then  planted  (65  cc 
containers)  in  sterilized  peat/vermiculite  (50/50,  v/v)  containing 
either  autoclaved  (control  treatment)  or  unautoclaved  (inoculated 
treatment)  symbiont  inoculum  at  a rate  of  20%  by  volume.  The  source  of 
the  inoculum  was  the  soil  mixture  used  in  the  shrub  dependency  study 
(3.1.1).  The  Frankia  and  mycorrhizal  fungi  in  this  soil  were 


24 


25 


propagated  in  pot  culture  in  the  greenhouse  by  growing  silver-berry  in 
a mixture  of  inoculum  soil  and  peat/vermiculite  for  2 months.  The  pot 
culture  soil  was  then  used  to  set  up  the  inoculated  and  uninoculated 
treatments . 

The  seedlings  were  grown  in  the  greenhouse  with  daylength 
extended  to  20  h and  a minimum  of  3.5  klx  light  intensity.  They  were 
fertilized  at  a rate  of  100  mg  L ^ of  15-15-18  Plant  Prod  fertilizer 
from  weeks  4 to  7 and  at  a rate  of  200  mg  L ^ during  weeks  8 and  9. 
In  week  10  fertilization  was  reduced  to  100  mg  and  the  silver- 
berry  was  supplemented  with  100  mg  L ^ of  NH4NO3.  This  regime 
continued  until  week  13  when  buffalo-berry  was  also  supplemented  with 
100  mg  of  NH4NO3.  Both  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry 

required  additional  N to  stimulate  growth  and  counteract  chlorosis.  In 
weeks  15  and  16,  fertilizers  were  applied  only  once  per  week.  Fertili- 
zation was  stopped  in  week  17  and  the  seedlings  were  hardened  off  out- 
doors for  two  weeks  prior  to  outplanting. 

Preplanting  mycorrhizal  and  nodulation  assessments  were  made 
by  randomly  selecting  10  plants  from  each  species-inoculation  treat- 
ment, removing  the  shoots,  washing  the  planting  mixture  from  the  roots 
and  determining  shoot  weight,  root  weight,  VA  mycorrhizal  status  and 
nodule  status.  The  methods  used  have  been  presented  previously. 

Survival  was  measured  in  the  field  one  year  after  outplan- 
ting. In  each  of  the  inoculated  and  uninoculated  treatments  in  each  of 
the  two  plots,  10  randomly  chosen  seedlings/species  were  excavated  and 
transported  to  the  laboratory.  Excavation  consisted  of  digging  an 
approximately  25  cm  square  to  a depth  of  20  cm  around  each  plant, 
shaking  the  excess  sand  from  the  roots  and  placing  the  plant  in  a 
plastic  bag.  The  shoots  were  clipped  at  the  root/shoot  interface  and 
shoot  height  and  weight  (after  drying  at  80®C)  were  measured.  The 
root  systems  were  washed  free  of  soil,  nodules  were  counted,  separated 
from  the  roots  and  weighed.  Five  of  the  10  root  systems  in  each  treat- 
ment were  selected  randomly  and  subsampled  for  VA  mycorrhizal  assess- 
ments. The  size  of  the  subsamples  varied  with  the  size  of  the  root 
system  and  ranged  from  15%  of  the  total  wet  weight  for  large  root 
systems  to  50%  of  the  total  for  small  root  systems.  Only  relatively 
young  roots  (2  mm  diameter  or  less)  were  sampled  since  older,  thicker 


26 


roots  usually  lacked  a cortex  - the  site  of  VA  mycorrhizal  infection. 
The  roots  were  cleared  (8  min)  and  stained  (7  min)  following  the 
methods  of  Phillips  and  Hayman  (1970)  and  mycorrhizal  infection  quanti- 
fied as  outlined  by  Zak  and  Parkinson  (1982).  The  remaining  roots  were 
dried  at  80®C  and  dry  weights  determined. 

Silver-berry  foliage  was  analyzed  for  total  N and  P.  All  10 
replicates  for  each  inoculated  and  uninoculated  treatment  in  each  plot 
were  ground  in  a Wiley  rotary  mill  to  pass  a 40  mesh  (425  ym) 
screen.  The  samples  were  digested  with  concentrated  sulphuric  acid  and 
30%  hydrogen  peroxide  in  a Technicon  BO-block  digester.  Acid  digests 
were  filtered  through  a Whatman  No.  1 filter  and  stored.  Both  total  N 
(as  ammonium  N)  and  P (as  orthophosphate  P)  were  determined  colorime- 
trically  on  a Technicon  Autoanalyzer  II  system  using  the  ammonium 
molybdate/ascorbic  acid  chemistry  for  PO4-P  and  the  Berthelot 
Reaction  for  NH4-N. 

Sampling  was  repeated  two  years  after  outplanting.  Due  to 
poor  survival  (particularly  in  the  inoculated  treatment)  during  the 
first  winter  after  outplanting,  the  number  of  surviving  plants  in  each 
treatment  in  each  plot  was  often  less  than  10.  To  increase  replica- 
tion, shrubs  from  both  plots  were  pooled  resulting  in  15  replicate 
silver-berry  and  7 replicate  buffalo-berry  plants  in  each  of  the  inocu- 
lated and  uninoculated  treatments.  It  was  felt  that  pooling  the 
silver-berry  from  both  plots  was  justified  since  plot  treatment  effects 
on  shrub  growth  and  nodule  development  were  insignificant  for  this 
species  after  the  first  year.  Although  buffalo-berry  exhibited  plot 
treatment  effects  on  growth  and  nodule  development  after  the  first 
growing  season,  pooling  of  second  year  plants  was  necessary  to  improve 
replication  so  statistical  analysis  could  be  performed. 

Two-year  old  plants  were  excavated  and  shoot  heights,  shoot 
weights,  root  weights,  nodule  weights  and  mycorrhizal  colonization 
assessed  as  described  for  the  one-year  old  plants.  In  addition,  root 
collar  diameters  and  frequency  of  branching  was  measured  at  this  sample 
time. 


27 


4.  RESULTS 

4.1  MYCORRHIZAL  STATUS  OF  WOODY  SHRUBS 

Buffalo-berry,  si  1 ver-berry,  saskatoon-berry  and  cinquefoil 
were  all  found  to  be  strictly  vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  (VAM) 
regardless  of  sampling  location  (Table  1).  Mycorrhizal  infection  of 
young,  active  roots  (dia.  <2  mm)  ranged  up  to  60%  for  both  buffalo- 
berry  and  silver-berry  and  was  slightly  higher  for  saskatoon-berry  and 
lower  for  cinquefoil . 

4.2  JUSTIFICATION  FOR  INOCULATION  OF  CONTAINERIZED  SILVER-BERRY 

AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

4.2.1  The  Dependency  of  Silver-berry  and  Buf falo-berrv  on  their 
Mycorrhizal  and  N2-Fixinq  Symbionts 

Shoot  weights  were  4 and  9 times  greater  for  inoculated 

silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry,  respectively,  than  for  their  uninocu- 
lated counterparts , while  the  roots  of  the  inoculated  shrubs  weighed  3 
and  4 times  more,  respectively,  than  the  roots  of  the  uninoculated 
shrubs  (Table  2).  In  the  inoculated  treatments,  nodule  development  was 
more  pronounced  on  the  buffalo-berry  than  the  si  1 ver-berry,  but  VAM 
colonization  was  approximately  the  same  for  the  two  shrub  species  (i.e. 
64  and  70%).  Low  levels  of  nodulation  and  mycorrhization  were  detected 
in  the  uninoculated  treatments  suggesting  contamination  of  the  planting 
mixture  occurred  during  the  course  of  the  experiment. 

4.2.2  Levels  of  VA  Mycorrhizal  Inoculum  in  Various  Soils  in  the  Fort 
McMurray^  Alberta  Region 

Although  slender  wheatgrass  was  used  to  assay  various  soils 
for  VAM  inoculum  potential,  the  results  should  be  applicable  to 
buf falo-berry  and  silver-berry  since  both  the  grass  and  the  shrubs  are 
VA  mycorrhizal  and  evidence  to  date  suggests  that  VAM  fungi  are 
generally  not  host  specific.  Because  grasses  grow  faster  and,  due  to 
the  fibrosity  of  their  roots,  tend  to  exploit  a greater  volume  of  soil 
than  many  shrub  species  do,  they  offer  a more  rapid  and  efficient  means 
for  surveying  soils  for  VAM  inoculum. 


28 


c 


Table  1.  Mycorrhizal  status  of  selected  woody  shrubs  growing  in  the 
Fort  McMurray  and  Kananaskis,  Alberta  regions.  VAM  = 
vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizae. 


Shrub 

species 

Sampling 
Location 
and  Date 

Adjacent 

Woodland^ 

Mycorrhizal  Infection 
Status  density  (%) 

Buf falo-berry 

Vaartnou  plot, 
Mildred  L.  camp 
(June,  n = 5) 

Jack  pine/ 
lichen 

VAM 

Most  roots  dead 
Infection  low, 
5-10% 

Buf falo-berry 

Cutbank  near 
Suncor  plant 
(Oct. , n = 5) 

Mixed/ 

aspen 

VAM 

20-40 

Buf falo-berry 

Kananaskis , 
roadcut 
(Aug.,  n = 5) 

Mixed/ 

aspen 

VAM 

20-60 

Si  1 ver-berry 

Vaartnou  plot, 
Mildred  L.  camp 
(June,  n = 5) 

Jack  pine/ 
lichen 

VAM 

20-50 

Si  1 ver-berry 

Kananaskis 
(Aug.,  n = 5) 

Mixed/ 

aspen 

VAM 

40-60 

Saskatoon-berry 

Outline  near 
Mildred  L.  camp 
(Oct. , n = 5) 

Jack  pine/ 
lichen 

VAM 

60-80 

Cinquef oi 1 

Vaartnou  plot 
(June,  n = 5) 

Jack  pine/ 
lichen 

VAM 

20-30 

i Woodland  located  in  close  vicinity  to  sampling  location. 


29 


Table  2.  Shoot  and  root  production  and  symbiont  development  in  silver- 
berry  and  buf falo-berry  grown  in  reconstructed  soils  with  and 
without  symbiont  inoculum.  Data  are  means  ± SD.^ 


Shrub  Inoculum 

Shoot  Weight 
(mg  dwt) 

Root  Weight 
(mg  dwt) 

Nodule  Weight 
(mg  wet  wt) 

VAM  Coloni- 
zation (%) 

Silver-berry  + 

422  ± 21*5 

139  ± 23b 

6 + 3*5 

70  ± 16*5 

- 

108  ± 27a 

45  ± 12a 

1 ± ia 

1 ± 2a 

Buffalo-berry  ^ 

244  + 5lb 

72  ± 25b 

44  ± 20 

64  ± 6*5 

- 

27  ± ga 

1+ 

00 

0) 

0 

2 ± 3a 

1 Data  analyzed  by  a two  sample  T-test.  Values  in  each  column  followed 
by  the  same  letter  for  either  silver-berry  or  buffalo-berry  are  not 
significantly  different  (p  = 0.05). 


Vesicular  arbuscular  mycorrhizal  inoculum  potential  was  negli- 
gible (0-5%  VAM  infection)  in  the  majority  of  peat  samples  (Table  3). 
Peat,  stockpiled  for  8 to  12  months  on  the  Syncrude  site,  lacked  VAM 
inoculum,  but  increased  levels  of  inoculum  were  evident  in  stockpiled 
peat  which  had  been  revegetated  with  a grass/legume  (VAM  hosts)  mixture 
for  6 years.  Mixed  woodland  soil  exhibited  the  highest  VAM  inoculum 
potential  with  coarse  textured  soil  from  an  aspen/shrub/grass  woodland 
being  the  most  infective  (64%  mycorrhizal  infection)  of  all  the  soils 
tested. 

4.2.3  Growth  Characteri sties  and  Mycorrhizal  Potential  of 
Undisturbed  Bog  Peat  and  Stockpiled  Peat 
Again,  slender  wheatgrass,  rather  than  a shrub  species,  was 
used  in  this  VAM  assay. 


30 


c 


Table  3.  Vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  (VAM)  infection  of  slender 
wheatgrass  grown  in  the  greenhouse  in  various  soils  collected 
from  the  Fort  McMurray,  Alberta  region.  Infection  expressed 
as  % total  root  length  infected. 


Soil  Description 

Age  of  Plant 
When  Sampled  (wk) 

% VAM 
Infection 

Aspen  woodland  mineral 

8 

13.0 

Fine  textured  soil  from  beneath 
undisturbed  mixed  woodland 

12 

37.0 

Coarse  textured  soil  from  beneath 
undisturbed  mixed  woodland 

12 

64.0 

Carex/Sphagnum  peat  mixture  from 
Syncrude  and  Suncor  leases 

9 

1 .6 

Undisturbed  peat,  Canstar  lease 

12 

0.6 

Undisturbed  peat,  0-15  cm  depth. 
Syncrude  lease 

12 

14.5 

Undisturbed  peat,  50-100  cm  depth, 
Syncrude  lease 

12 

4.8 

NT  2 (Syncrude)  stockpile  peat 
stockpiled  for: 

8 mo. , 0-  1 5 cm  depth 

12 

0 

8 mo. , 50-100  cm  depth 

12 

3.1 

1 2 mo. , 0-  1 5 cm  depth 

8 

0.2 

Peat  stockpiled  for  6 years  on 
Syncrude  site  (East  Muskeg) 

9 

13.7 

31 


Shoot  weights,  root  weights,  shoot/root  (S/R)  ratios,  total 
root  lengths  and  % mycorrhizal  infection  were  very  similar  in  the 
undisturbed  and  stockpiled  peat  (Table  4).  There  was  very  little 
effect  of  sampling  depth  on  the  majority  of  parameters  tested,  with  the 
exception  of  shoot  weights,  which  were  greater  in  the  0 - 15  cm  deep 
undisturbed  and  stockpiled  peat  than  in  the  50  - 100  cm  deep  peat. 
Percent  VAM  colonization  was  highest  in  the  undisturbed  surface  peat, 
but  not  significantly  so  since  sample  variation  was  high  (Appendix 
Table  1).  Mycorrhizal  inoculum  levels  were  generally  very  low  with  the 
infection  consisting  mainly  of  hyphae  and  arbuscules  (Appendix  Table  1). 

4.2.4  Mycorrhizal  Potential  of  Revegetated  Dyke  Peat 

Slender  wheatgrass  shoot  and  root  weights  and  root  lengths 
were  slightly  lower  in  6 year-old  stockpiled  peat  than  8 month-old 
stockpiled  peat,  while  the  reverse  was  true  for  VA  mycorrhizal  inoculum 
potential  (Tables  4,  5).  Fertilization  of  the  6 year-old  stockpiled 
peat  significantly  improved  plant  productivity  while  not  significantly 
altering  VAM  inoculum  potential  (Table  5). 

4.2.5  Effect  of  VA  Mycorrhizal  Inoculation  on  Plant  Performance  of 
Slender  Wheatgrass  Grown  in  Stockpiled  Peat  Under  Fertilized 
and  Unfertilized  Conditions 

Inoculation  of  slender  wheatgrass  with  the  VAM  fungus.  Glomus 
aqqreqatum,  significantly  improved  shoot  and  root  production  but  only 
if  the  plants  received  no  fertilizer  and  only  when  the  plants  were  10 
weeks  old  (Table  6).  As  expected,  fertilization  greatly  improved  plant 
growth  but  counteracted  the  potentially  beneficial  effects  of  the  VAM 
fungus,  resulting  in  very  few  differences  between  inoculated  and  unino- 
culated treatments  at  the  two  sample  times. 

4.2.6  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Status  of  Containerized  Shrubs  Planted 
on  the  Oil  Sands  Tailings  Reconstruction  Plots 

Shoot  and  root  weights  of  the  containerized  VAM  shrub  species 
planted  on  the  RRTAC  oil  sands  tailings  reconstruction  plots  (i.e.  pad 
plots)  are  given  in  Table  7.  Buf falo-berry  and  silver-berry  shoots 
appeared  to  be  underweight  and  the  symbiont  status  of  all  the  shrubs 


32 


Table  4.  Characteristics  of  slender  wheatgrass  grown  in  peat  from  a 
muskeg  bog  and  peat  stockpiled  for  eight  months 


Sampling  Depth  (cm) 

Plant  Parameter 

Peat  Source 

0-15 

50  - 100 

Shoot  weight 

Undisturbed 

94.3b 

54.4a 

(mg  dwt  planf^) 

Stockpile 

73.9b 

59.7a 

Root  weight 

Undisturbed 

127.9b 

96.2a 

(mg  dwt  plant“^) 

Stockpile 

97.2a 

100.1a 

Shoot/root  ratio 

Undisturbed 

0.74  (.23) 

0.57  (.09) 

Stockpile 

0.77  (.15) 

0.60  (.13) 

Total  root  length 

Undisturbed 

545.0a 

578.6a 

(m  L-^) 

Stockpile 

563.5a 

623. ia 

Percent  VAM  infection 

Undisturbed 

14.5a 

4.sa 

Stockpile  " 

oa 

3.1a 

^ Shoot  and  root  weight  data  analyzed  by  a Kruskal-Wallis  test.  Root 
length  and  VAM  infection  analyzed  by  two-way  ANOVA.  Values  in  each 
data  set  followed  by  the  same  letter  are  not  significantly  different 
(p  = 0.05).  Values  in  brackets  are  standard  deviations. 


33 


Table  5.  Root  and  shoot  production  by  slender  wheatgrass  grown  in  the 
greenhouse  in  fertilized  and  unfertilized  dyke  peat.  Peat 
had  been  stockpiled  for  6 years  prior  to  spreading  on  the 
dyke. 1 


Treatment 

Measurement 

Unfertilized 

Ferti lized 

Shoot  weight 
(mg  plant 

55^ 

144^ 

Root  weight 
(mg  plant 

81 " 

139'^ 

Shoot/Root 

0.68 

1 .04 

Root  length 
(m  soil) 

326® 

508*’ 

Mycorrhizae  (%) 

14® 

16® 

^ Data  analyzed  by  Hotelling's  test.  Means  in  each  row  not 
followed  by  the  same  letter  differ  significantly  (p  = 0.05). 


was  poor.  With  the  exception  of  one  pincherry  plant,  which  exhibited  a 
small  patch  of  mycorrhizal  infection  caused  by  the  "fine  endophyte", 
all  the  shrubs  were  nonmycorrhizal . None  of  buf falo-berry  and  16%  of 
the  silver-berry  were  nodulated.  The  fungal  root  pathogen,  Thielaviopsis . 
was  occassional ly  observed  in  the  silver-berry  roots  while  Olpidium, 
another  fungal  parasite,  occurred  frequently  in  the  roots  of  all  the 
shrub  species. 


34 


Table  6.  Shoot  and  root  production  by  slender  wheatgrass  grown  in 
stockpiled  peat  (50-100  cm  deep)  inoculated  with  Glomus 
aqqreqatum  and  fertilized  or  left  unferti lized. ^ 


4 week  old  plants 

10  week 

old  plants 

Measurement 

Fertilized 

Unfertilized 

Fertilized 

Unfertilized 

Shoot  weight 

Inoculated  22^ 

132*^ 

22'^ 

-1 

(mg  dwt  plant) 

be 

Uninoculated  14 

7^ 

113'' 

12ab 

Root  weight 

Inoculated  22*^ 

10^ 

194'' 

30*^ 

-1 

(mg  dwt  plant) 

Uninoculated  18^ 

10^ 

146' 

11" 

^ Data  for  each  parameter  analyzed  by  three-way  ANOVA  (MSE  = .0715 

and  .1077  for  shoots  and  roots  respectively).  A three-way  interaction 
was  observed  for  shoot  data,  hence  Scheffe  multiple  contrasts  were 
applied  to  individual  treatment  means.  No  three-way  interaction  was 
observed  for  root  data,  hence  Scheffe  multiple  contrasts  were  applied 
to  two-way  means.  Values  within  each  data  set  followed  by  the  same 
letter(s)  do  not  differ  significantly  (p  = 0.05).  Data  required 
LN  (Y  + 1)  transformation. 


4.2.7  Growth  Characteristics  and  Symbiont  Status  of  Woody  Shrubs 

Raised  in  Various  Commercial  Nurseries  in  Alberta  and  British 
Columbia 

Shoot  heights,  shoot  weights,  root  weights  and  S/R  ratios  for 
all  species  surveyed  are  summarized  in  Table  8.  Shoot  weights  for  each 
plant  species  varied  greatly  amongst  nurseries  mainly  due  to 
differences  in  crop  year,  growing  regimes  (i.e.  fertilization  rates, 
light  conditions)  and  possibly  container  size.  Silver-berry  from  the 
Laidlaw  Nursery  were  of  an  acceptable  size  (0.98  g)  while  those  from 


35 


■a  <o 
o f— 
z Q. 


>> 

s: 


o • 

Q 
O I/) 

2 +1 

QC 

oeL  ^ 
m 
0)  CM 
^ II 
+J  c 


O 1/1 
cr 

-O  «3 
O)  0> 

-M  e 

c 

CO  0) 
r—  S_ 
Q.  CO 

in  (O 
0>  +-> 
♦r-  (O 

u a 

<u 

a. 

in 

'=r 
00 
3 01 
i.  r- 

sz 

in  » 
&- 

<4_  (U 

O JO 
E 

j/1  0) 

3 -H 
•»->  Q. 
(O  <U 
+->  00 
in 

c. 

O)  *r- 

3 (/I 
“O  -H 
O O 
C f— 
Q. 


o. 

< 


fO  o 


(O  o 
M 3 
&- 

J=  +-> 
i-  in 

i.  c 
O O 
u o 
>1  <u 

s: 


<u 

Ql 

00 


oj  L. 

O) 

oi  x: 


1/1  r—  a 

O -r-  i. 

od  3 Q_ 


>) 

i. 

t- 

(U 

JO 


C (U 
i_  > 

<U  I— 

CD  -r- 
00 


One  small  patch  of  VAM  infection  was  observed  in  the  root  system  of  one  pincherry  plant.  The  mycorrhizal 
fungus  was  identified  as  the  “fine  endophyte."  In  general,  roots  were  in  good  condition,  although  extensive 
infection  by  Thielaviopsi s . a root  pathogen  was  observed  in  two  of  the  silver-berry  plants.  Olpidi urn,  another 
root  parasite,  was  observed  regularly  in  the  roots  of  all  species. 


36 


Table  8 

Size  of 

container 

-grown 

and  bareoot  woody  shrubs 

obtained 

from  four 

commerical  nurseries  in 

August, 

1985. 

Data  are 

means  ± SD 

Container 

No.  of 

Shoot  Height  Shoot  Weight  Root  Weight 

S/R 

Plant  species 

Nursery 

Crop 

size  (cc) 

seedlings 

(cm) 

(g) 

(g) 

( range) 

Pincherry 

Reid-Collins 

Unknown 

SL  47(?) 

8 

NM 

1.58  ± 0.43 

2.26  ± 0.63 

.7  ( .5  - 1.5) 

Whitecourt 

Heeled  in  ( *84) 

NA 

2 

60,  46 

17.64,  8.16 

NA 

NA 

Laidlaw 

1984 

SL  150 

10 

38  ± 8 

1 .64  1 0.5 

1.76  ± 0.48 

.9  (0.6  - 1 .4) 

Laidlaw 

1985 

SL  150 

10 

46  ± 10 

1 .91  1 0.85 

1.36  1 0.55 

1 .4  (0.9  - 1 .8) 

Saskatoon 

Reid  Collins 

Unknown 

SL  47(?) 

10 

NM 

1.70  ± 0.56 

1 .97  ± 0.95 

0.9  (0.6  -1.5) 

Whitecourt 

1984 

Styro-20 

10 

35  ± 4 

4.46  ± 1.19 

2.01  ± 0.58 

2.3  (2.0  - 3.4) 

Whitecourt 

1985 

Styro-4 

10 

21  ± 4 

1 .84  1 0.53 

NM 

NM 

Laidlaw 

1985 

SL  150 

10 

17  ± 4 

1 .42  ± 0.41 

0.83  ± 0.37 

2.0  (1.0  - 3.7) 

Oliver 

1983 

SL  150 

10 

30  ± 11 

2.36  1 1 .41 

1 .48  ± 0.92 

1.7  (1.0  - 2.3) 

Oliver 

3 - 5 y(?) 

Bare root 

10 

35  ± 5 

NA^ 

NA* 

NA* 

Dogwood 

Oliver 

1985 

SL  150 

10 

18  ± 3 

0.46  1 0.13 

0.18  ± 0.06 

2.5  (2.0  - 3.6) 

Willow 

Reid-Collins 

1985(?) 

SL  150 

10 

NM 

NA* 

0.18  ± 0.08 

NM 

Cinquefoil 

Whitecourt 

1984 

Styro-8 

10 

39  ± 7 

2.62  1 1.61 

0.68  ± 0.56 

4.6  (2.5  - 7.6) 

Silver-berry 

Reid-Collins 

? 

SL  47(?) 

10 

NM 

0.39  1 0.06 

0.18  1 0.07 

2.8  (1.1  - 3.3) 

Laidlaw 

1985 

SL  150 

10 

23  ± 6 

0.98  1 0.48 

0.39  ± 0.24 

2.8  (1.3  - 6.1) 

Oliver 

1983 

SL  150 

10 

19  13 

0.77  1 0.29 

0.30  ± 0.12 

2.7  (1.8  - 3.2) 

Buffalo-berry 

Reid  Collins 

? 

SL  47(?) 

10 

NM 

1.11  ± 0.53 

1 .97  1 0.77 

0.6  (0.4  - 0.9) 

Syncrude^ 

1981 

7 

10 

NM 

0.59  1 0.16 

0.58  ± 0.19 

1 .0 

1982 

7 

10 

NM 

0.57  ± 0.23 

0.57  ± 0.17 

1 .0 

1983 

7 

10 

NM 

0.11  1 0.04 

0.12  1 0.03 

0.9 

Silver 

Oliver 

1985 

SL-150 

10 

12  ± 1 

0.18  1 0.04 

0.05  1 0.02 

3.7  (2.6  - 6.3) 

buffalo-berry 

Oliver 

3 - 5 yr(?) 

8a re root 

10 

36  ± 4 

NA* 

NA* 

NA* 

Syncrude* 

1983 

7 

10 

NM 

0.09  1 0.04 

0.07  ± 0.03 

1.3 

Russian  olive 

Oliver 

3 - 5 yr  (?) 

Bareroot 

10 

32  1 4.3 

NA* 

NA* 

NA* 

^ Seedlings  pruned 

* Cutting  included  in  shoot  weight  determination 

* 1981  crop  sampled  in  June  1984;  1982  and  1983  crops  sampled  in  October,  1983 

* Sampled  in  June  1984 

NM  = not  measured;  NA  = not  applicable;  SL  = Spencer  Lemaire;  Styro  = Styroblocic 


37 


the  Reid-Col lins  Nursery  were  unusually  small  (0.39  g)  in  comparison. 
The  1981  and  1982  buffalo-berry  from  the  Syncrude  Nursery  also  tended 
to  be  underweight  and  silver  buf falo-berry  from  the  same  nursery  were 
particularly  stunted.  The  shoot  weights  of  the  actinorhizal  shrubs 
were  generally  less  than  those  of  the  non-actinorhi zal  shrubs  of 
equivalent  age.  Shoot/root  ratios  were  highly  variable,  ranging  from 
0.6  (Reid-Col lins  buf falo-berry)  to  4.6  (Whitecourt  cinquefoil). 

Seedlings  sampled  in  the  same  year  that  they  were  planted  were 
usually  non-mycorrhizal  (Table  9).  Seedlings  which  were  one  year  old 
or  more  and  had  probably  overwintered  in  the  shadehouse  or  outdoors 
were  quite  often  mycorrhizal  (Reid-Col 1 ins  pincherry,  saskatoon, 
buf falo-berry,  Whitecourt  saskatoon,  Oliver  saskatoon)  but  not  always 
so  (Laidlaw  pincherry,  Oliver  si  1 ver-berry.  Syncrude  buf falo-berry) . 
The  bareroot  stock  was  heavily  mycorrhizal.  The  “fine  endophyte", 
characterized  by  its  narrow  hyphae  (2-3  ym  dia)  and  finely  branched 
arbuscules,  was  frequently  observed  on  the  roots  of  saskatoon  (White- 
court)  and  pincherry  (Reid-Collins,  Laidlaw  '85  pincherry).  Many  of 
the  seedlings  were  infected  with  the  fungal  root  parasite,  Olpidium, 
regardless  of  nursery  or  seedling  age.  Thielaviopsis . a pathogenic 
fungus  which  causes  black  root  rot  of  tobacco  and  many  vegetables, 
occurred  in  60%  of  the  silver-berry  from  the  Laidlaw  nursery  although 
this  was  not  evident  from  the  condition  of  the  shoot. 

There  was  no  evidence  of  nodulation  on  the  actinorhizal  shrubs 
unless  the  shrubs  were  older  than  one  year  or  were  bareroot  stock. 

4.2.8  Rates  of  Mycorrhization  and  Nodulation  in  Buffalo-berry  Grown 
in  Woodland  Soil  and  Amended  Tailings  Sand  in  the  Greenhouse 
Shoot  and  root  weights  increased  with  time  in  both  soil  treat- 
ments and,  by  the  end  of  the  study,  were  significantly  greater  in  the 
woodland  soil  than  in  the  tailings  sand  (Table  10).  Seedlings  raised 
in  woodland  soil  became  mycorrhizal  much  more  rapidly  (25%  infection  at 
2 weeks)  than  seedlings  grown  in  amended  tailings  sand  (no  infection 
until  8 weeks  after  planting).  Percent  mycorrhizal  infection  increased 
significantly  with  time  in  the  woodland  soil  but  not  in  the  tailings 
sand  where  it  remained  relatively  stable.  A significantly  greater 
amount  of  VAM  infection  was  attained  in  the  woodland  soil  (87%)  than  in 


38 


Table  9.  Vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  (VAM)  status  and  Frankia  nodule 

development  in  woody  shrubs  samples  from  four  commercial  nurseries 
in  1985, 


Plant  species 

Nursery 

Crop 

No.  of  % Seedlings 
Seedlings  Mycorrhizal 
Surveyed 

* VAM"" 
(range) 

X Seedlings 
Nodulated 

Nodule 
No.  Plant->- 

Nodule  Weight 
(g  wet  plant"^) 

Pincherry 

Reid-Collins 

Unknown 

8 

63 

<1  - 20 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Whitecourt 

Heeled  in  (1984) 

2 

100 

33 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Laidlaw 

1984 

8 

0 

0 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Laidlaw 

1985 

10 

30 

<1-2 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Saskatoon 

Reid-Col 1 ins 

Unknown 

10 

50 

<2  - 73 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Whitecourt 

1984 

10 

100 

<1  - 58 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Laidlaw 

1985 

10 

0 

0 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Oliver 

1983 

10 

40 

<1  - 66 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Oliver 

3-5  y (?) 

10 

100 

40  - 60 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Dogwood 

Oliver 

1985 

10 

0 

0 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Willow 

Reid-Collins 

1985  (?) 

10 

0 

0 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Cinquefoi 1 

Whitecourt 

1984 

10 

0 

0 

NA 

NA 

NA 

Silver-berry 

Reid-Collins 

Unknown 

25 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Laidlaw 

1985 

10 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Oliver 

1983 

10 

0 

0 

10 

4 

NM 

Buffalo-berry 

Reid-Collins 

Unknown 

25 

20 

<1  - 33 

88 

NM 

0.27  ± 0.24 

Syncrude* 

1981 

10 

0 

0 

60 

1 - 3 

0.019  - 0.098 

1982 

10 

0 

0 

20 

NM 

NM 

1983 

10 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Silver 

Oliver 

1985 

10 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Buffalo-berry 

3 - 5 y (?) 

Bare root 

100 

50  - 80 

100 

22  ± 13 

0.47  ± 0.26 

Syncrude* 

1983 

5 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Russian  olive 

Oliver 

3 - 5 y (?) 

Bareroot 

100 

40  - 70 

100 

6 ± 3 

0.12  ± 0.10 

^ % VAM  refers  to  % of  fine  (<5  mm  diameter)  roots  infected  with  VAM 

* 1981  crop  sampled  in  June,  1984;  1982  and  1983  crops  sampled  in  October,  1983 

s sampled  in  June  1984 

NA  = not  applicable;  NM  = not  measured 


Table  10.  Rates  of  shoot  and  root  production,  mycorrhizal  colonization  and  nodulation  by  buffalo-berry 
grown  in  undisturbed  woodland  soil  and  peat/clay  amended  tailings  sand.  Data  are  means 


39 


1/1 

03 

JO 

CD 

00 

■cr 

C 

f— 

■M 

r- 

(U 

— 

o 

o 

+ 

+1 

+1 

3 

•(— 

(0 

lO 

IT- 

CJ 

CO 

E 

' — ' 

■H 

3 

0) 

XJ 

03 

JO 

r— 

c 

CV 

r~ 

3 

fO 

r— 

T3 

O 

-o 

o 

o 

+ 

+1 

+1 

Z 

o 

o 

Lfl 

3 

vO 

00 

c 

o 

-H 

1/1 

03 

03 

03 

n3 

o> 

in 

J3 

M 

a. 

cn 

CV 

• r* 

C 

r— 

o 

o 

+1 

+1 

■H 

o 

03 

cn 

cn 

JO 

o 

CV 

n 

CV 

ra 

N 

•t— 

JO 

X3 

n 

03 

03 

JO 

i- 

"O 

03 

03 

CV 

r* 

o 

i- 

c 

00 

CV 

CV 

1— 

o 

03 

CM 

u 

r— 

+1 

+l 

+1 

> 

■o 

+1 

+1 

s; 

o 

r~ 

o 

LT> 

00 

m 

lO 

00 

X 

3 

CM 

r— 

iO 

1/1 

03 

03 

JO 

u 

*o 

oi 

f— 

f— 

CV 

CV 

m 

c 

an 

r— 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

■¥\ 

03 

f— 

CV 

Cfl 

00 

■«r 

1— 

cr 

E 

■H 

03 

03 

03 

.a 

o 

O 

-o 

r— = 

r— 

CV 

00 

00 

O 

c 

cr 

QC 

03 

r— 

•a 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

o 

o 

CV 

CV 

m 

Lf1 

00 

3 

CV 

o 

n 

1/1 

fO 

03 

JO 

JO 

u 

oi 

CM 

r— 

o 

iJ3 

c 

r— 

n 

OI 

r— 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

03 

•cr 

OI 

CO 

m 

CV 

a 

K- 

-<r 

vJ3 

E 

r— 

■H 

JO 

O 

1 -o 

03 

03 

03 

JO 

O 

a 

1 cr 

n 

■cr 

O 

CV 

vJ3 

x: 

: 03 

oo 

ir> 

(/! 

1 I — 

, — . 

-o 

o 

+1 

+1 

-H 

+t 

+1 

o 

3 

r~» 

o 

CV 

O 

r~ 

r— 

CV 

m 

cn 

JO 

1 — 

CO 

a 

1 ^ 

C71  3 

CV 

GO 

CV 

o 

< 

r— 

CV 

c o 
t-  VI 


CT 

(1)  T- 

i-  -a 


+-• 
■o  c 

+->  u 


(U  c 
3 cn 


o 

O +J 

.c  o 


-a  0) 
c i- 

<T3  03 


C O) 
> r— 

o 

Z (U 
< E 

fO 

>) 

(O 

(U  +J 

c 

o >» 

.Q 

>> 

jQ  -a 

d> 

•o  3 

dj  O 
M r— 


E r- 
3 O 
r—  O 


40 


the  tailings  sand  (33%).  The  mycorrhizal  data  were  highly  variable 
suggesting  a high  degree  of  variation  in  VAM  inoculum  potential  amongst 
the  replicate  soil  samples.  Nodules  were  first  visible  at  8 weeks  when 
100%  of  the  woodland  soil  buffalo-berry  had  formed  nodules  compared 
with  40%  for  seedlings  planted  in  the  tailings  sand.  Seedlings,  older 
than  8 weeks,  were  all  nodulated  with  nodules  produced  on  woodland 
seedlings  weighing  more  than  those  produced  on  tailings  seedlings, 
Nodulation  increased  with  seedling  age. 

4.2.9  Rates  of  Mycorrhizal  and  Nodule  Development  in  Silver-berry 

Qutplanted  in  an  Undisturbed  Woodland  and  the  Suncor  Tar 

Island  Dyke 

Shoot  weights  did  not  increase  over  the  growing  season  in  any 
of  the  planting  locations;  in  fact,  there  tended  to  be  a loss  in  weight 
between  weeks  6 and  12  due  to  leaf  abscission  (Table  11).  Root  growth 
was  also  negligible,  as  was  evident  from  the  lack  of  root  growth  out  of 
the  planting  plug  in  all  treatments  except  the  dyke  plot  revegetated  in 
1978.  Seedling  survival  over  the  first  6 weeks  after  outplanting  was 
higher  in  the  undisturbed  mixed  woodland  (100%)  than  in  the  dyke  plots, 
particularly  in  the  plot  revegetated  in  1974  where  only  36%  of  the 
seedlings  were  alive  after  6 weeks.  Vegetation  in  the  1974  plot  was 
dominated  by  sweet  clover. 

Nodulation  was  minimal  after  6 weeks  although  2 plants  in  the 
1978  dyke  plot  possessed  small  nodules.  After  12  weeks  all  the  seed- 
lings in  the  undisturbed  woodland  plot  had  become  nodulated,  but,  with 
the  exception  of  the  1978  dyke  plot  where  4 plants  became  nodulated, 
none  of  the  seedlings  planted  on  the  dyke  formed  nodules.  Nodule 
number  was  highest  on  plants  from  the  woodland  plot.  Almost  all  seed- 
lings, regardless  of  planting  location,  became  mycorrhizal  within 
6 weeks  of  being  outplanted.  Percent  mycorrhizal  infection,  however, 
was  patchy,  possibly  a result  of  poor  root  growth  out  of  the  planting 
plug. 


41 


Table  11,  Growth,  nodulation  and  VA-mycorrhi zal  development  in  uninoculated 
silver-berry  out-planted  in  the  boreal  forest  and  Suncor  Tar 
Island  Dyke  for  6 and  12  weeks.  Dyke  locations  revegetated  in 
1971,  1974,  1978.  Data  are  means  ± SD^. 


Measurement 

Age 

(wk) 

Preplant 

Planting 

locations 

Undisturbed 

Dyke  1971 

Dyke  1974 

Dyke  1978 

Shoot  weight 

6 

216  ± 60^ 

229  ± 84^ 

195  ± 58® 

205  ± 50® 

230  ± 80® 

(mg  dry  plant~^) 

12 

216  ± 68^ 

153  ± 34^*^ 

111  ±42® 

158  ± 47®^ 

176  ± 63®^ 

Root  weight 

6 

119  ± 34*^ 

80  ± 27^*^ 

87  ± 24®^ 

73  ± 24® 

94  ± 37® 

(mg  dry  plant”^) 

12 

119  ± 34^ 

145  ± 23® 

83  ± 34® 

119  ± 66® 

127  ± 67® 

Survival/50 

6 

NA 

50 

38 

18 

43 

Root  growth 

6 

NA 

0 

0 

0 

0 

out  of  plug 

12 

0 

0 

0 

4/10 

Plants  with 

6 

0 

0/10 

0/10 

0/10 

2/10 

nodules 

12 

0 

10/10 

0/10 

0/  7 

4/10 

Nodules/plant 

6 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

(wet  wt  plant"^) 

12 

0 

4-21  (.006- 

.028)  0 

0 

1-8 

Plants  with 

6 

0 

10/10 

9/10 

10/10 

8/10 

VAM 

12 

0 

10/10 

9/10 

7/  7 

10/10 

% VAM 

6 

0 

<1-58 

<1-71 

5-31 

5-29 

12 

0 

<1-20 

5-70 

<2-30 

1-20 

Shoot  and  root  weight  data  analyzed  by  one-way  ANOVA  and  differences  detected  by  Scheffe 
multiple  contrasts  for  pairwise  comparisons.  Values  in  each  row  followed  by  the  same 
letter(s)  are  not  significantly  different  (p  = 0.05). 


42 


4.3  DEVELOPMENT  OF  A GROWING  REGIME  FOR  GREENHOUSE  PRODUCTION  OF 

MYCORRHIZAL,  NODULATED  SILVER-BERRY  AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

4.3.1  Fertilizer  Effects  on  Growths  Nodulation  and  Mvcorrhizal 
Development  in  Buffalo-berry  and  Silver-berry 
Shoot  production  by  buffalo-berry  was  greater  in  the  woodland 
soil  than  in  the  tailings  sand  but  only  in  the  0 and  100  mg  L ^ 
fertilizer  regimes  (Table  12).  At  the  higher  fertilizer  regimes  (200 
and  400  mg  L shoot  production  in  the  two  soils  was  similar. 

There  was  an  increasing  trend  in  shoot  weights  with  increasing  fertili- 
zation for  plants  in  the  tailings  sand  but  not  for  plants  in  the  wood- 
land soil  where  no  significant  differences  in  shoot  weights  were 
detected  amongst  the  three  fertilizer  rates  tested.  Shoot  response  of 
silver-berry  was  similar  to  that  of  buffalo-berry  (Table  13),  with  the 
exception  that  the  400  mg  L ^ fertilizer  regime  greatly  stimulated 
shoot  production,  particularly  in  the  tailings  sand  treatment. 

The  patterns  of  root  production  at  the  various  fertilizer 
regimes  were  very  similar  for  the  two  shrub  species  (Tables  12,  13). 
Overall,  root  weights  were  lower  in  the  tailings  sand  than  in  the 
woodland  soil.  Fertilization  at  200  mg  L~^  significantly  increased 
buf falo-berry  root  production,  while  silver-berry  root  weights  were  1.7 
and  2.0  times  greater  at  the  400  mg  L~^  rate  than  at  the  0 and 
100  mg  L”^  rates,  respectively.  Silver-berry  plants  were  generally 
heavier  than  buf falo-berry  plants. 

At  the  0 and  100  mg  L~^  fertilizer  regimes,  almost  all  the 
buffalo-berry  and  silver-berry  seedlings  in  both  test  soils  developed 
nodules.  At  200  mg  L ^ fertilizer  (56  mg  N),  nodule  formation  based  on 
nodule  weight,  appeared  to  be  inhibited  but  not  significantly  so.  However, 
application  of  400  mg  L ^ fertilizer  or  112  mg  N significantly  reduced 
nodule  production  rate  on  both  species  in  both  soil  types.  Although 
nodule  formation  was  reduced  at  the  high  fertilizer  regime,  all  the 
silver-berry  and  the  majority  of  buffalo-berry  in  the  woodland  soil 
became  nodulated. 

Mycorrhi zation  appeared  to  be  less  sensitive  to  fertilization 
than  nodulation.  The  majority  of  seedlings  at  all  fertilizer  treat- 
ments in  both  soils  developed  mycorrhizae,  but  the  extent  of 


43 


Table  12.  Fertilizer  effects  on  growth,  nodulation,  and  mycorrhizal 
development  in  buffalo-berry  grown  in  woodland  soil  and 
peat/clay-amended  tailings  sand.  Age  = 20  weeks. ^ 


Measurement 

Soil 

Fertilizer  (mq/L  28-14-14) 

0 100  200  400 

Row  Means 

Shoot  weight 

Woodland 

377*’*= 

473*’='^ 

497^° 

552^° 

NA 

(mg) 

Tailings 

144^ 

269®*’ 

519°^ 

664^ 

NA 

Root  weight 

Woodland 

239 

234 

404 

388 

316'' 

(mg) 

Tailings 

51 

178 

273 

288 

198® 

Column  means  145^ 

206^ 

339° 

338° 

% Seedlings 

Woodland 

100 

100 

80 

100 

with  nodules 

Tailings 

100 

80 

20 

40 

Nodule  weight 

Woodland 

60 

34 

11 

7 

00 

C\J 

(mg  wet) 

Tailings 

24 

22 

6 

3 

14® 

Column  means  42° 

28^ 

8.5"° 

5" 

% Seedlings 

Woodland 

100 

100 

100 

100 

with 

Tailings 

100 

80 

100 

80 

mycorrhizae 

% Mycorrhizal 

Woodland 

94 

90 

82 

40 

infection 

Tailings 

46 

56 

73 

23 

50® 

Column  means  70° 

73° 

78° 

32" 

^ Data  analyzed  by  two-way  ANOVA.  Differences  amongst  means  were 
detected  by  Scheffe  multiple  contrasts  for  pairwise  comparisons 
applied  to  individual  means  where  a significant  interaction  occurred 
or  to  row  or  column  means  if  no  interaction  was  detected  in  the  ANOVA. 
Values  in  each  data  set  followed  by  the  same  letter  are  not  signi- 
ficantly different.  (MSE  for  shoot  weight,  root  weight,  nodule  weight, 
and  % mycorrhizal  infection  are  12040,  7944.9,  270.21,  and  515.28, 
respectively. ) 


44 


Table  13.  Fertilizer  effects  on  growth,  nodulation,  and  mycorrhizal 
development  in  silver-berry  grown  in  woodland  soil  and 
peat/cl  ay-amended  tailings  sand.  Age  = 20  weeks. ^ 


Measurement 

Soil 

Fertilizer  (mq/L  28-14 
0 TOO  200 

-14) 

400 

Row  Means 

Shoot  weight 

Woodland 

515 

637 

586 

622 

590^ 

(mg) 

Tailings 

286 

399 

453 

863 

500® 

Column  means  401^ 

518^ 

520^ 

Root  weight 

Woodland 

337 

334 

444 

507 

406*^ 

(mg) 

Tai lings 

257 

174 

230 

523 

296® 

Column  means  297^ 

254^ 

337^*^ 

515^ 

% Seedlings 

Woodland 

100 

100 

100 

100 

with  nodules 

Tailings 

100 

100 

50 

40 

Nodule  weight 

Woodland 

91 

58 

30 

15 

49® 

(mg  wet 

Tailings 

42 

76 

64 

12 

49® 

plant  ^) 

Column  means  67^ 

67^ 

47^' 

14^ 

% Seedlings 

Woodland 

100 

100 

100 

100 

with 

Tai lings 

100 

100 

50 

80 

mycorrhi zae 

% Mycorrhizal 

Woodland 

94 

90 

93 

85 

91® 

infection 

Tailings 

37 

52 

29 

17 

34‘> 

Column  means  66^ 

7l" 

61^ 

51^ 

^ Data  analyzed  by  two-way  ANOVA.  Shoot  weight  data  required  a LO 
transformation  (MSE  = .02788)  while  root  weight  data  required  a SQRT 
transformation  (MSE  = 11.319).  MSE  for  nodule  weight  and  mycorrhizal 
infection  = 1273.9  and  298.71,  respectively.  No  significant  inter- 
action was  detected,  hence  Scheffe  multiple  contrasts  for  pairwise 
comparisons  were  applied  to  row  and  column  means.  Values  in  either  the 
row  or  column  means  for  each  measurement  followed  by  the  same  letter 
are  not  significantly  different  (p  = 0.05). 


45 


mycorrhizal  colonization  was  significantly  less  in  the  tailings  sand 
than  in  the  woodland  soil.  Percent  mycorrhizal  infection  in  the 
buffalo-berry  was  significantly  reduced  at  the  high  fertilizer  rate, 
but  mycorrhizal  formation  in  the  silver-berry  was  not  inhibited  at  any 
of  the  fertilizer  rates. 

Based  on  these  data,  it  appears  that  the  fertilizer  concentra- 
tion required  to  produce  a mycorrhizal,  nodulated  silver-berry  or 
buffalo-berry  should  not  exceed  56  mg  N L"^. 

4.3.2  Effect  of  Container  Volume  and  Inoculation  on  Growth  of 

Silver-berry 

Both  12  and  20  week-old  seedlings  were  significantly  larger 
and  heavier  when  grown  in  150  cc  containers  than  when  grown  in  65  cc 
containers  (Table  14).  Shoot  and  root  weights  of  inoculated  plants 
were  significantly  greater  than  those  of  the  uninoculated  plants,  but 
this  was  the  case  only  when  plants  were  grown  in  the  150  cc 
containers.  Plants  grown  in  the  65  cc  containers  demonstrated  no 
significant  response  to  inoculation. 

Almost  all  the  seedlings  became  nodulated,  including  those  in 
the  uninoculated  treatments,  suggesting  that  there  was  some  cross- 
contamination of  the  Frankia  symbiont  between  treatments.  All  the 
plants  in  the  inoculated  treatments  became  mycorrhizal,  but  percent 
infection  was  low  (20-25%)  and  variable.  None  of  the  uninoculated 
plants  became  mycorrhizal  and  container  size  did  not  seem  to  influence 
mycorrhizal  development. 

4.3.3  Growth  of  Silver-berry  as  Influenced  by  Soil  Temperature  and 

Symbiont  Inoculation 

Shoot  heights,  shoot  weights  and  root  weights  were,  with  the 
exception  of  roots  in  the  Glomus  aggregatum  treatment,  significantly 
greater  at  26®C  than  at  16®C  (Table  15).  Root  collar  diameters  were 
also  greater  at  26°C  but  only  for  seedlings  inoculated  with  woodland  and 
silver-berry  soil.  The  largest,  heaviest  plants  with  the  heaviest  root 
systems  were  obtained  in  the  26®C,  woodland  soil-inoculated  treatment 
(shoot  ht  = 24  cm,  shoot  wt  = 966  mg,  root  wt  = 424  mg).  Inoculation  with 
silver-berry  soil  also  stimulated  shoot  production  but  not  to  the  same 


Table  14.  Effect  of  container  volume  and  inoculation  on  shoot  and  root  production  by  silver-berry. 
Plants  received  200  mg  15-15-18  fertilizer  twice  weekly. 


46 


p— 

c 

(0 

(U 

M 

r— 

r-* 

_J 

•r— 

JZ 

+ 1 

o 

+1 

+-» 

i- 

o 

S- 

LO 

<71 

o 

o 

CM 

I— 

u 

>» 

s: 

p— 

<13 

N 

1/1 

•r- 

JZ 

c 

i- 

O 

O 

fO 

i- 

O 

o 

O 

r~ 

o 

t— 

r-» 

Q. 

u 

>» 

C (T3 
IT3  r— 
f—  3 

-o 

o 

^ 2 


2 
”0 

o 
crt  o 


u 

s-  o 


O) 

01 

4_>  <u 
C 0) 

(0  3 


o o o 
00  o o 


(O  (J 
ro  ' 


cn 
<y» 

r-  CO  r— 


(T3  .Q  -O 
O r-“  r» 

r-  00 
CM  CM  vO 


U 

r— 


o 

o o 


o o o o 

00  GO  O O 


(Q  ra  u .a 
^3"  O v£>  O 

CM  'd-  O 

CO  CO  ^ 1.0 


(O 

vO 

o 


LO 

y£> 

'S’ 

<31 

r— 

00 

CO 

CO 

CM 

Data  analyzed  by  two-way  ANOVA.  Data  for  12  week  shoot  weights  required  a LO  transformation, 
MSB's  for  12  week  shoot  and  root  data  and  20  week  shoot  and  root  data  are  .0059,  948,15,  4287, 
and  2264,  respectively.  Significant  interactions  were  detected  in  each  age  group,  consequently 
Scheffe  multiple  contrasts  were  applied  to  individual  means.  Values  in  each  column  for  each  age 
class  followed  by  the  same  letter  are  not  significantly  different  (p  < 0.05). 


Table  15.  Growth  of  silver-berry  as  influenced  by  soil  temperature  and  inoculation  with 

mycorrhizal  and  Na-fixing  symbionts.  Seedlings  were  grown  in  a growth  chamber  for 
13  weeks. ^ 


47 


i_  -I- 

0)  o 

> KTt 


■a 

u 

(U 

J3  -o 

c 

'a- 

CM  00 

fT3 

. 

. . 

.O 

<D 

r— 

CM 

cn 

CM  CM 

r- 

in 

•o 

r— 

CM 

in 

n 

o 

CO 

<T> 

o 

3 

«T3 

CO 


JQ 

m 


(tS  (TJ 


.o 

<T» 

vO 

CO 


fO  o 
<T>  -O’ 


fO 

00 

CO 

C\J 


fO  (O 
O 

CO  r» 


(tJ  JO 

<y»  o 

LD  <7> 
(—  CVJ 


a u 

CO  C\J 


vO  un 
O o 
+1  +1 
r—  CVJ 
C\J  C\J 


^ un 
CD  O 
+1  +1 
00 
f—  CM 


vO  v£) 

o o 
+1  +1 
00  un 
CM  CM 


-a 

cu 

+-> 

(T3 

=j 

u 

JO  TD 
r—  CO 

u .o 
ni  to 
CM 

JO 

U 

a 

be 

in  ^ 
O O 
+1  +1 

u 

r-  m 

CM  CM 

in 

O GO 

o vn 

o 

r—  r” 

r— 

00 

00 

. . 

c 

•f“ 

c 

CO 

'a- 

(—  CO 

CM  1— 

O 

(1)  cn 

n 

<n 

vO 

<n 

iJ3 

n 

n n 

(/) 

CO.  0 

E ^ 
<u 

CM 

' 

CM 

' 

CM 

' 

CM 

r—  CM 

1— 

E* 

OD 

^ — s 

u 

E 

CT> 

E 

+-> 

E 

-M 

jC 

i_ 

E 

x: 

■M 

C 

Ol 

to 

Ol 

CU 

•r— 

r— 

•r” 

Oi 

4-> 

E 

(U 

r— 

(U 

•r- 

C 

<u 

JZ 

o 

cu 

3 

0> 

(D 

to 

&- 

U 

-•-> 

3 

cn 

r— 

=J 

(U 

■H 

a. 

1/1 

o 

+-» 

E 

O 

■H 

+1 

to 

o 

o 

to 

O 

O 

Or: 

<u 

.c 

o 

•r* 

JC 

O 

X 

5:^ 

tn 

q:: 

“O 

cn 

00  ' 

Data  analyzed  by  a two-way  ANOVA.  Shoot  height,  shoot  weight,  and  root  weight  data 
required  a LO  transformation.  MSE's  for  shoot  height,  root  collar  diameter,  shoot  weight, 
and  root  weight  are  .00477,  .06803,  .01097,  and  .01377,  respectively.  Differences  detec- 
ted by  Scheffe  multiple  contrasts  for  pairwise  comparisons.  Values  for  each  measurement 
followed  by  the  same  letter(s)  are  not  significantly  different  (p  = 0.05). 


48 


degree  as  inoculation  with  woodland  soil.  Inoculation  with  Glomus 
aqqreqatum  pot  culture  soil  resulted  in  seedlings  which  were  signifi- 
cantly smaller  than  the  uninoculated  controls.  Shoot/root  ratios 
ranged  from  1.6  to  2.8  with  the  biggest,  healthiest  seedlings  attaining 
a S/R  of  2.5. 

Almost  all  the  seedlings  in  the  soil-inoculated  treatments 
became  nodulated,  regardless  of  temperature  (Table  16).  Some  of  the 
seedlings  in  the  uninoculated  and  Glomus-inoculated  treatments  at  26®C 
also  became  nodulated,  presumably  due  to  contamination  from  the  soil 
treatments,  but  the  weight  of  nodules  produced  was  minimal.  Nodule 
weight  produced  per  plant  in  the  soil-inoculated  treatments  was  5 to  11 
times  greater  at  26®C  than  at  16®C.  Inoculation  with  woodland  soil 
resulted  in  more  nodule  production  per  plant  than  inoculation  with 
si  1 ver-berry  soi  1 . 

All  of  the  inoculated  seedlings,  at  both  temperatures, 
developed  mycorrhizae.  However,  the  % mycorrhizal  root  length  in  the 
soil-inoculated  seedlings  was  significantly  greater  at  26®C  than  16°C. 
There  was  no  significant  effect  of  temperature  on  % mycorrhizal  root 
length  for  seedlings  inoculated  with  G.  aqqreqatum. 

In  this  experiment,  the  largest  seedlings  with  the  best  mycor- 
rhizal and  nodule  development  occurred  in  the  26°C,  woodland  soil- 
inoculated  treatment. 

4.3.4  Use  of  Soil,  Nodule  and  Pure  Culture  Inocula  for  Introducing 

N2-Fixinq  Frankia  to  Containerized  Silver-berry 

After  18  weeks  growth,  the  tallest  (24-27  cm),  heaviest 
(1.1  - 1.3  g shoot  wt)  silver-berry  seedlings  with  the  biggest 
(0.44  - 0.65  g)  and  most  heavily  nodulated  (170  - 200  mg/plant)  root 
systems  were  produced  in  the  treatments  inoculated  with  soil  from 
beneath  wild  buf falo-berry,  crushed  silver-berry  nodules  or  crushed 
silver-berry  nodules  treated  with  polyvinyl  pyrrolidine  (Table  17). 
Plants  inoculated  with  Frankia  ordered  from  Rhizotec  successfully 
formed  nodules  but  this  was  not  reflected  in  shoot  heights  and  shoot 
and  root  weights  which  were  not  significantly  different  from  the  unino- 
culated controls.  No  nodulation  occurred  in  plants  inoculated  with 
Frankia  which  had  been  isolated  from  buffalo-berry.  Treatment  of 


Table  16,  Effect  of  soil  temperature  and  inoculation  on  mycorrhizal  and  nodule 
development  in  silver-berry  grown  in  a growth  chamber  for  13  weeks. ^ 


49 


E 

3 

•H 

03 

00 

a 

3 

<u 

E 

i- 

O 

CT 

r— 

CJ 

CD 

03 

>) 

i- 

Qi 

XJ  >— 
I »r“ 

i-  o 

<U  00 

> 


T3 

o> 

XJ 
i-  C 
3 03 

4->  r— 
I/O  TO 
O 

-a  o 


o o 

<7^ 


O O 
O O 


o o 

CO 


(O 

tn 


X 

JZ 

C 

0) 

S- 

03  03  03 

u 

X X 

r-  E 

X) 

u 

c:  3 

o 

• Q.  03 

vO 

o 

o 

o 

o 

oO 

oO 

03  >— 

u 

+->  *r-  (/) 

C\J 

o 

o 

<7> 

u 

>>SZ  -M 

f— > 

O X 

E 

03<—  03 

(1) 

•r-  =3  .C 

03 

03  E -)-» 

X <u 

3 

03  s_ 

■M 

'03  >» 

i-  <D 

• 14-  ^ 

•r-  3 

E 

^ 14- 

3 

o 

03  03  X 

X to 

s- 

JD  .C  03 

(-) 

<D  +4 

ot- 

E u 3 

O 

03 

u 

03 

xa 

i-  03 

3 00  O 

GO 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

X 

X 

C r- 

vO 

r— 

o 

o 

o 

CO 

00 

03 

03 

>>r- 

CM 

■M  E 

X 

03  Xi  O 

03  3 

3 

1 <4- 

X -M 

r— 

3 X 

03 

O 

X 03  4-> 

■M  CT 

X 

O 4->  C 

x;  03 

03 

C O 03 

03  i- 

03  E 

•f“  X 

03 

i-  +4  03 

03  CT 

O 03  S- 

3 03| 

03 

<4-  X 3 

3 

(/» 

X • 

03  03  03 

C CDI  03 

. i_  03 

03 

•H 

CM  03  E 

U 

X3 

X 

03 

00  3 

X) 

X) 

X 

03 

u 

s-  c 

X 

CO  J= 

CO 

CO 

'S- 

o 

o 

on 

r- 

03  03 

00  u 

m 

CO 

on 

r» 

o 

o 

on 

OO 

X) 

X 

X 03  to 

o 

CM 

r— 

E X 

03 

C O 03 

♦ 

3 03 

-!-» 

to  C 

o 

C -•-> 

03 

03  ^ 

03 

• S-  o 

II 

03  r— 

3 

CO  03  <4- 

r—  3 

O 

03  <4- 

o. 

3 O 

o 

CO  M-  I/O 

X O 

c 

GO  •<-  03 

O C 

•r— 

• O 3 

4-> 

z 

C 

in  r— 

c 

in 

c 

3 

03 

03 

, 

=3 

• ► > 

&- 

o 

O 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

03 

00  >» 

03 

r— 

03 

LlJ 

JZ 

•«— 

"f- 

tO 

tO 

tO 

tO 

<o 

tO 

tO 

<X 

vO 

tO 

03 

03 

C/3 

4-4 

03  C 

o 

03  C_3 

I— 

CM 

r— 

CM 

r— 

CM 

r— 

CM 

1— , 

CM 

» XI 

s: 

CD 

1/3  03 

(/a 

Q,  0 

>3 

00  E 

C 

•1—  •!— 

E 

X3 

C 3 

03 

3 00 

03 

O 3 

• 

r— 

c 

h- 

X 

c 

•<“  +4 

03 

+4 

> 

4-4 

03  O 

N 

03  03 

o 

O 

Q.  C 

x: 

>3 

E r- 

z 

O 

4-> 

H 

+4 

I— 

S-  3 

c 

i. 

03 

1 

•r“ 

03 

O X 

O i- 

3 

■M 

+-» 

CD 

3 

r— 

C 

M-  O 

.c 

r— 

<4-  03 

C 

J3 

E 

to 

03 

00  C 

4-4 

03 

•«-» 

1/3 

133 

CD 

00 

03 

N 

JZ 

c 

03 

M 

00  x-s 

C 

03 

r~ 

•r” 

CD 

03 

•1“ 

+4 

00 

03  03 

c 

•r- 

4-4  00 

03 

c 

O, 

03 

H 

C 

M 

x: 

03 

03 

i-  x: 

03 

JO 

00 

•M 

E 

•r- 

3 

1 

•r— 

•r- 

&- 

c 

3 

+4  4-4 

r— 

i- 

03  i- 

c 

03 

r— 

U3 

I/O 

+4 

r— 

.C 

&- 

03 

i- 

i-  03 

03 

&- 

X 

03 

03 

03 

c 

X 

o 

f— 

03 

E 

4-> 

o 

4-4  4-4 

r” 

3 

03 

r“ 

f— 

1— 

03 

03 

u 

4-i 

QG  O 

O 

o 

C 4-4 

a. 

to 

03 

3 

3 

3 

r— 

03 

o 

>3 

+4 

03 

O i- 

O 

>» 

O 03 

03 

I/O 

X 

X 

X 

o. 

00 

u 

E 

O 

C3 

(/)  t|- 

i- 

E 

U 1— 

03 

o 

O 

O 

>> 

o 

s: 

c 

z 

z 

E 

S- 

1— 

ro 

N 
•<-  XJ 


> • 
o >» 
z <— 
c <u 
> 
>»  T“ 

tT3  +-> 
3 U 
O) 


O Q. 

3 00  <C 
+-» 


+J  on 
oo 
T3  O 
c • 

03 

(U 

<C  i- 
> <u 
O 3 


00 


0>  • <4- 

> 00  •!— 
C X 
+->  O 
u 00  >> 

0)  *1“  r— 

Q.  S-  4-> 
00  03  C 
0)  X.  03 

s-  e U 

O -I— 

<_)  ot_ 


container-grown  silver-berry. 


50 


c 


£= 

O 


-o 

o 

(Z 

•a 

c 

(O 


o 

i- 

Ui 


o 

a. 


i- 

o 


<d 


s- 

=j 


3 

u 


r* 


H 

■h> 

1 

a> 

■P 

"3 

2 

O 

u 

.a 

3 

(TJ 

JO 

(O 

JD 

“O 

•3 

na 

O 

o> 

CDr— 

O 

o 

O 

O 

r— = 

vD 

OO 

r— 

•1-  Q. 

OJ 

<3 

00 

o 

un 

P 

3 

(U 

r— 

(— = 

OJ 

t— 

•o 

3 c? 

o 

E 

z 

>w>’ 

o 

z 

H 

U 

I 

JD 

JQ 

u 

jQ 

(V 

4-> 

fO 

ns 

(0 

na 

o 

JD 

na 

U 

r— ’ 

C 

o 

CD 

o 

oo 

r* 

OJ 

un 

vD 

3 

itJ 

r— 

p— ■ 

r— 

■o 

r— 

o 

Q- 

z 

p' 

m 

3) 

P** 

CD 

un 

00 

o 

o 

O 

o 

O 

o 

O 

O 

o 

•r~ 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

\ 

■H 

o 

CO 

o 

oo 

ja 

un 

■«:r 

OJ 

CO 

na 

» 

• 

« 

• 

• 

« 

OJ 

OJ 

OJ 

OJ 

OJ 

CM 

CM 

CM 

o 

-a 

-P 

X) 

JD 

o 

JD 

■o 

3 

+-» 

.C  ^ 

na 

«3 

na 

u 

U 

na 

3 

o 

0>  <3 

CD 

r- 

un 

CD 

un 

o 

•r“  >— <’ 

OJ 

CVJ 

cn 

OJ 

■<r 

i— 

vja 

Oi 

0) 

. 

3 

o 

O 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

+-i 

+-» 

.3 

JZ 

JD 

.3 

o 

to 

na 

JD 

na 

u 

u 

na 

u 

o 

•r- 

<3 

oo 

o 

un 

r-“ 

(3 

.c 

CD  w 

v3 

v£> 

uo 

f— 

O 

OJ 

00 

3 

. 

» 

« 

« 

o 

o 

O 

O 

f- 

o 

s. 

na 

i. 

1— 

cu 

r~ 

-p 

o 

3 

o 

<u 

JD 

.Q 

“O 

U 

CJ 

E E 

na 

3 

fO 

na 

u 

JD 

na 

3 

E 

O 

un 

CM 

o 

<3 

O 

r” 

•r* 

. 

. 

e 

. 

. 

o 

O 

OJ 

OJ 

OJ 

OJ 

oo 

OJ 

CM 

OO 

o 

Q£ 

JD 

JD 

jQ 

(O 

<0 

JD 

na 

u 

u 

na 

(J 

00 

p— 

vD 

ca^ 

<3 

un 

CD 

E 

» 

« 

, 

• 

• 

« 

•r— 

u 

00 

CD 

OO 

00 

oo 

uD 

(U 

P— 

p~ 

I— 

OJ 

CM 

(— ~ 

CM 

:n 

<u 

<U 

L. 

i- 

3 

3 

+-» 

■P 

3 

f— ■ ,p».. 

r-“ 

O 

3 • 

3 ^ 

3 

O </> 

U >) 

-P 

c_a 

CJ 

0) 

JD 

i-. 

N 

>i 

s_ 

< ^ 

1 

< — s 

CL 

<v 

0)  na 

o>  i~ 

>> 

na 

p > 

Q. 

p > 

>> 

u 

— J 

OJ 

C_) 

P 

i_ 

na  i- 

os  i- 

> 

DC  P 

i_ 

3 

3 JD 

< 

J- 

TD  0) 

> S- 

ce:  i. 

Ol. 

Qi:  s- 

3 

o.  u 

Q.  1 

P- 

oa 

1—  JD 

•w  0) 

■.wP  (U 

0) 

E 

o 

<u 

O 

Oi 

JD 

•r“  1 

JD 

JD 

• • 

JD 

3 

00 

r“ 

3 -p 

(T3  r— 

oc 

1 

3 O 

un  1 

un  1 

un 

3 1 

1— 

o 

•r-  O 

«r-  to 

0)  i- 

<V  i- 

<U 

0)  i- 

3 

■O 

M 

^ u- 

(U 

na 

t—  0) 

r-  <U 

r~ 

P Oi 

O 

c 

+-» 

C T” 

3 <4- 

r— 

> 

f — <4- 

3 > 

3 > 

3 

na  > 

O 

to 

c 

to  sz 

<T3  3 

•f- 

f— 

,p- 

•a  r— 

3 >— 

3 

OJ  1— 

c 

o 

0£ 

S-  31 

o 

•r- 

O 3 

O T- 

O -r- 

O 

S-  .1“ 

1— « 

o 

u_  ^ 

U_  ' 

00 

00 

00  JD 

2 un 

Z Irt 

z 

p (/) 

Data  analyzed  by  one-way  ANOVA.  Shoot  and  root  weight  data  required  SQRT  and  LO  transformations 
respectively.  MSE's  for  height,  root  collar  diameter,  shoot  weight,  root  weight,  nodule  number  and 
nodule  weight  are  5.96,  .1012,  9.864,  .02004,  26.54,  and  2404,  respectively.  Differences  detected 
by  Scheff@  multiple  contrasts  for  pairwise  comparisons.  Values  in  each  column  followed  by  the  same 
letter(s)  are  not  significantly  different,  S/R  ratios  are  means  ± SD. 


51 


nodules  with  polyvinyl  pyrrolidine  significantly  improved  nodule  forma- 
tion and  growth.  Nodules  were  also  formed  on  plants  inoculated  with 
soil  from  beneath  silver-berry  planted  in  the  RRTAC  pad  plot,  but  lack 
of  stimulation  in  shoot  and  root  growth  suggests  the  nodules  were 
ineffective  at  the  time  of  sampling. 

4.3.5  Effect  of  Inoculation  Method  and  Time  on  Nodule  and  Mycor- 
rhizal  Development  of  Buffalo-berry 

Although  inoculation  with  soil  or  soil  slurry  did  not  signifi- 
cantly affect  shoot  height  or  branching,  shoot  and  root  weights  were 
significantly  greater  in  the  soil  mixture  treatment  than  in  the  soil 
slurry  or  uninoculated  treatments  (Table  18).  Plants  in  both  the  soil 
mixture  and  soil  slurry  treatments  developed  nodules  but  nodule 
weights/plant  were  greatest  on  seedlings  in  the  soil  mixture.  Only 
plants  inoculated  by  mixing  woodland  soil  into  the  planting  medium 
became  mycorrhizal. 

The  age  (2,  3,  4,  5 weeks)  of  the  seedlings  when  soil  slurry 
inoculum  was  injected  into  the  containers  did  not  have  a significant 
impact  on  shoot  height,  branching,  shoot  weight,  root  weight  and  nodule 
development  (Table  19).  None  of  the  seedlings  inoculated  with  soil 
slurry  became  mycorrhizal,  regardless  of  seedling  age. 

Based  on  these  data,  it  appears  that  mixing  soil  with  a high 
symbiont  inoculum  into  the  planting  medium  prior  to  planting  is  the 
most  effective  means  for  inoculating  containerized  seedlings. 

4.4  FIELD  TRIAL  TO  TEST  GROWTH  RESPONSE  OF  INOCULATED  SILVER-BERRY 

AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

4.4.1  Pre-Planting  Symbiont  Status  of  Inoculated  and  Uninoculated 
Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry 

The  mycorrhizal  and  nodulation  status  of  the  silver-berry  and 
buffalo-berry  grown  in  the  University  of  Calgary  greenhouse  and  out- 
planted  on  the  University  of  Calgary  reclamation  plots  adjacent  to  the 
RRTAC  soil  reconstruction-woody  plant  experimental  area  on  the  Syncrude 
lease  are  presented  in  Table  20.  Both  silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry 
were  small  and  underweight  compared  with  the  seedlings  surveyed  from 


Table  18.  Use  of  soil  and  soil  slurry  for  promoting  nodulation  and 
mycorrhizal  development  in  container-grown  buffalo-berry, ^ 


Measurement 

Inoculum  Source 

None 

Woodland  Soil 
Mixture 

Woodland  Soil 
Slurry 

Shoot  height  (cm) 

17.9® 

22.9® 

20.7^ 

Branches  seedling  ^ 

6.1® 

9.3® 

5.4^ 

Shoot  weight  (g) 

1.14® 

2.06*’ 

1.21^ 

Root  weight  (g) 

0.43® 

o.ss'’ 

0.34^ 

S/R  ratio 

2. 7+0. 4 

3.411.00 

3.9±0.8 

Nodule  weight  (g  wet  plant^ 

) 0 

0.25+0.09 

0,095±0,07 

Mycorrhizal  root  length  (%) 

0 

25+20 

0 

^ Data  analyzed  by  one-way 

ANOVA  and 

differences  detected 

by  Scheffe 

multiple  contrasts  for 

pairwise 

comparisons.  Shoot 

height  data 

required  a LO  transformation.  MSE's  are  .0064,  14.99,  ,1248,  and 
.0273  for  shoot  height,  branches,  shoot  weight,  and  root  weight  data, 
respectively.  Values  in  each  row  followed  by  the  same  letter(s)  are 
not  significantly  different  (p  =0.05).  S/R,  nodule  weight,  and  mycor- 
rhizal values  are  means  ± SO. 


many  of  the  commercial  greenhouses  (Table  8).  Although  100%  and  90%  of 
the  inoculated  shrubs  became  mycorrhizal  and  nodulated,  respectively, 
this  was  not  evident  in  the  shoot  and  root  weights  which  were  almost 
identical  in  the  inoculated  and  uninoculated  treatments.  None  of  the 
uninoculated  plants  developed  mycorrhizae,  but  nodules  did  develop  on 
20%  of  the  silver-berry  in  the  uninoculated  treatments,  presumably  a 
result  of  contamination  from  the  inoculated  treatments. 

4.4.2  Field  Performance  of  Silver-berry  After  One  and  Two  Growing 

Seasons 

Percent  survival  of  the  uninoculated  silver-berry  after  the 
first  winter  in  the  field  was  substantially  better  than  was  the  case 
for  the  inoculated  shrubs  (Table  21).  More  seedlings  survived  in 
Plot  1 than  in  Plot  2. 


53 


Table  19.  Nodule  and  mycorrhizal  development  in  container-grown  buffalo- 
berry  inoculated  with  soil  slurry  at  various  ages.^ 


Seedling  Age  When 

Inoculated 

(Weeks) 

Measurement 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Shoot  height  (cm) 

20.7® 

21.7® 

20.2® 

21  .6® 

Branches  seedling  ^ 

5.4® 

4.7® 

4.2® 

6.3® 

Shoot  weight  (g) 

1.21® 

1.04® 

1.14® 

1.19® 

Root  weight  (g) 

0.34® 

0.32® 

0.36® 

0.37® 

S/R  ratio 

3.910.8 

3.310.4 

3.611 .4 

3.410.1 

-1 

Nodule  weight  (g  wet  plant  ) 

.095® 

.076® 

.087® 

.072® 

Mycorrhizal  root  length  (%) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

^ Data  analyzed  by  one-way  ANOVA  and  differences  detected  by  Scheffe 
multiple  contrasts  for  pairwise  comparisons.  Values  in  each  row  fol- 
lowed by  the  same  letter(s)  are  not  significantly  different  (p  = 0.05). 
S/R  ratios  are  means  ± SO. 


With  the  exception  of  mycorrhizal  root  length,  which  was  sig- 
nificantly greater  in  plants  from  Plot  2 than  plants  from  Plot  1,  there 
were  no  significant  differences  in  plant  performance  and  symbiont  deve- 
lopment between  the  two  plot  treatments. 

After  one  growing  season,  shoots  of  the  inoculated  shrubs  were 
1.4  - 2.3  times  taller  than  those  of  the  uninoculated  shrubs,  while  shoot 
weights  were  3-7  times  greater  in  the  inoculated  treatment  than  in  the 
uninoculated  treatment.  The  difference  in  shoot  production  by  inoculated 
and  uninoculated  shrubs  was  extended  into  the  second  growing  season  when 
inoculated  silver-berry  were  1.6  times  taller  and  3.4  times  heavier  than 
their  uninoculated  counterparts  (Tables  21,  22;  Figures  3,  4).  Although 
the  root  weights  are  probably  a gross  underestimate  because  of  the 
difficulty  in  excavating  entire  root  systems,  they,  nevertheless,  were 
significantly  greater  in  the  inoculated  treatment  after  both  the 


Table  20.  Pre-planting  mycorrhizal  and  nodule  status  of  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  outplanted 
in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots  (with  and  without  surficial 
clay).  Data  are  means  (n=10)  ± SO. 


54 


c 


"O 

<u 

■p 

p 

c 

03 

03 

f— 

f— 

3 

O 

o 

o 

O 

a. 

“O 

cy» 

03 

CM 

O 

03 

M 

(/> 

•f— 

H 

N 

p 

JC 

o 

o 

o 

O 

c 

s- 

o 

o 

03 

p 

r— 

r— 

r— 

o 

a. 

o 

>> 

r*- 

CO 

CO 

r-“ 

o 

CO 

CM 

r— 

O 

o 

o 

O 

03 

H 

P 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

IP 

O 

c 

H- 

00 

CM 

vX 

o 

03 

CM 

CM 

uO 

sX 

1— 

. 

» 

a 

C3 

O 

o 

o 

> 

i- 

-a 

CM 

CM 

o 

00 

O 

O 

r— 

o 

w 

. 

• 

P 

O 

O 

O 

o 

O 

p 

O 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

JZ 

cn 

cr 

X) 

un 

uO 

o 

o 

r— 

r— 

0) 

• 

« 

. 

3 

o 

O 

O 

o 

P 

c 

fO 

03 

un 

'a- 

un 

r— 

o 

O 

CM 

1 — 

Q- 

. 

p 

o 

O 

o 

O 

o 

o 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

x: 

00 

o 

<x 

f— 

1— 

m 

o 

O 

O 

o 

T3 

(1) 

P 

03 

1 

3 \ 

+ 

1 

+ 

1 

U 

+ 

O 

C 

»— ) 

3^ 

s_ 

S- 

>> 

>3 

S- 

L. 

P 

i. 

<u 

03 

&- 

i-. 

X) 

nZ 

CD 

03 

1 

1 

xa 

XJ 

(/) 

o 

O 

1 

1 

03 

f — 

r— 

p 

p 

P 

•r- 

03 

03 

(U 

03 

c 

O 

M-. 

M- 

> 

> 

03 

0) 

M- 

U»- 

(— = 

r— 

Ol 

3 

3 

•r” 

•r— 

Q. 

00 

00 

00 

C/) 

</3 

i.n  vA 

I I 


o O 

S_  S- 


-o  -O 
O)  <u 
cn  cj> 
c c 
m (T3 


o o 


4-»  -P 
u u 
<U  Q) 


> > 


H W 


55 


Table  21.  Plant  growth,  nodulation,  and  vesicular-arbuscular  mycor- 
rhizal  development  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated  silver- 
berry  outplanted  for  1 year  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site.  Data  are  means 
(n=10)  ± SD.i 


Measurement 

Inoculated 

(V-) 

Plot  1 
(tailings  + 
peat) 

Plot  2 
(tailings, 
peat  + clay) 

Row 

X 

Survival(%) 

-H 

40 

16 

- 

67 

47 

Shoot  height  (cm) 

+ 

23  ± 7 

20  ± 8 

21  .s'’ 

- 

10  ± 6 

14  ± 4 

12.03 

Column 

X 

16.5a 

17.03 

Shoot  weight  (g  dry 

5.35  ± 3.96 

3.26  ± 2.54 

4.31^ 

planf^) 

_ 

- 

0.70  ± 0.83 

1 .01  ± 0.67 

0.86 

Column 

X 

3.03^ 

2.143 

Root  weight  (g  dry 

+ 

2.46  ± 1 .77 

1 .49  ± 0.96 

1 .98'’ 

plant  ^) 

- 

0.45  ± 0.45 

0.64  ± 0.46 

0.55a 

Column 

X 

1 .46^ 

1 .073 

Nodules  (no. 

+ 

77  ± 79 

55  ± 44 

os') 

planf^) 

- 

13  ± 6 

20  ± 9 

16.5a 

Column 

X 

453 

37.53 

Nodules  (g  wet 

+ 

1.59  ± 1.33 

0.89  ± 0.70 

1.24'’ 

planf^) 

_ 

- 

0.11  ± 0.08 

0.30  ± 0.25 

0.21a 

Column 

X 

0.85^ 

0.603 

Mycorrhizal  root 

+ 

56  ± 15 

58  ± 14 

57'’ 

length  (%)  (n=5) 

- 

2 ± 2 

22  ± 24 

12a 

Column 

X 

29a 

40b 

Shoot  N (%) 

+ 

2.69  ± 0.21 

2.63  ± 0.46 

2.66'’ 

_ 

- 

2.56  ± 0.37 

2.12  ± 0.54 

2.34a 

Column 

X 

2.63^ 

2.383 

Shoot  P (%) 

+ 

0.15  ± 0.02 

0.14  ± 0.04 

0.145a 

_ 

- 

0.13  ± 0.03 

0.12  ± 0.06 

0.125a 

Column 

X 

0.143 

0.133 

^ Data  analyzed  by  two-way  ANOVA  and  differences  detected  by  Scheffe 
multiple  contrasts  for  pairwise  comparisons.  Shoot  weight,  root 
weight,  nodule  number  and  nodule  weight  data  were  L0(x  + l) 
transformed.  MSE's  are  42.45,  0.0463,  0.0238,  0.1220,  0.0174,  242.37, 
0.1701  and  0.0014  for  each  measurement  in  sequential  order.  For  each 
measurement  row  means  or  column  means  followed  by  the  same  letter  are 
not  significantly  different  (p  = 0.05). 


56 


Table  22.  Plant  growth,  nodulation  and  vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal 
development  in  inoculated  and  uninoculated  silver-berry 
outplanted  for  2 years  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site.  Data  are  means 
(n  = 15)  ± SO.i 


Treatment 


Measurement  Uninoculated  Inoculated 


Shoot  height  (cm) 

34.5  ± 163 

56 

± 

14b 

Shoot  weight 

(g  dry  planf^) 

10.3  ± 10.83 

35.4 

+ 

21 .7b 

Root  weight 

(g  dry  planf^) 

2.0  ± 1.43 

5.8 

+ 

3.5b 

Root  collar  diameter  (mm) 

5.9  ± 243 

10.8 

+ 

33b 

Branches 

(number  plant  ~^) 

15  + 163 

39 

+ 

21b 

Nodule  weight 

(g  wet  planf^) 

0.7  + 0.63 

2.1 

+ 

1.3b 

Mycorrhizal  roots  (%) 

43  ± 293 

67 

+ 

14b 

^ Data  analyzed  by  a two  sample  T test.  Shoot  weight,  root  weight 
and  nodule  weight  data  required  LO  transformations . Values  in  each 
row  followed  by  the  same  letter  are  not  significantly  different 
(p  = 0.05). 


100 


57 


C\l 


cr 

< 

Ld 


(N 


I 

o ^ 

CL  Cd 
^ < 

o > 

_i 

CL 


oooooooooo 

OTOOr^COlD'^fOCMT- 

(no)  1H0I3H  lOOHS 


Figure  3 Shoot  heights  (±  SO)  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated  silver-berry  outplanted  in 
reconstructed  soil  for  two  growing  seasons. 


58 


CNJ 

Dr: 

< 

LU 


(o)  IHOGM  iOOHS 


Figure  4 Shoot  weights  (±  SD)  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated  silver-berry  outplanted  in 
reconstructed  soil  for  two  growing  seasons. 


59 


first  and  second  growing  seasons.  Branching  was  also  significantly 
better  in  the  inoculated  shrubs  than  in  the  uninoculated  shrubs. 

The  significant  growth  response  of  the  inoculated  shrubs 
aboveground  was  reflected  in  the  symbiont  status  on  the  roots  below- 
ground. The  inoculated  shrubs  had  significantly  more  nodules  per  plant 
and  weighed  an  average  of  3 (Plot  2)  to  14  (Plot  1)  times  more  than 
those  which  developed  on  the  uninoculated  shrubs  from  indigenous  soil 
inoculum  (Table  21,  Figure  5).  Even  after  two  growing  seasons  the 
weight  of  nodules  produced  by  the  inoculated  plants  was  3 times  greater 
than  that  produced  by  the  uninoculated  shrubs.  The  length  of  root 
occupied  by  mycorrhizal  fungi  was  also  significantly  higher  in  the 
inoculated  shrubs  than  in  the  uninoculated  shrubs  after  both  growing 
seasons  (Tables  21,  22;  Figure  6).  After  the  first  growing  season 
mycorrhizal  development  was  significantly  better  in  the  tailings  sand 
amended  with  peat  and  clay  (Plot  2)  than  in  the  sand  amended  only  with 
peat  (Plot  1)  suggesting  that  the  type  of  emendation  influenced  mycor- 
rhizal inoculum  potential . 

After  one  growing  season,  the  nitrogen  concentrations  in  the 
silver-berry  foliage  were  significantly  higher  for  the  inoculated 
shrubs  than  the  uninoculated  shrubs;  however,  no  differences  were 
detected  in  foliage  P between  the  inoculated  and  uninoculated  treat- 
ments (Table  21 ) . 

4.4.3  Field  Performance  of  Buf falo-berrv  After  One  and  Two  Growing 

Seasons 

As  was  the  case  for  the  si  1 ver-berry,  survival  of  buffalo 
berry  after  the  first  winter  was  significantly  less  for  the  inoculated 
shrubs  than  the  uninoculated  shrubs  with  a greater  majority  of  the 
seedlings  surviving  in  Plot  1 than  Plot  2 (Table  23). 

The  pattern  of  response  of  surviving  buf falo-berry  to  inocula- 
tion was  also  very  similar  to  that  of  silver-berry  with  inoculated 
buffalo-berry  being  taller  (1.5  times)  and  having  heavier  shoots 
(3.6  - 4.5  times),  roots  (2.1  - 2.6  times),  and  nodules  (1.6  - 1.8 
times)  and  more  mycorrhizal  colonization  (2.0  - 2.7  times)  than 


60 


c 


(iNvid/o)  s3inaoN 


Figure  5 Nodule  development  in  inoculated  and  uninoculated  silver-berry  outplanted  in 
reconstructed  soil  for  two  growing  seasons.  Data  are  means  ± SO. 


100 


61 


(N 

0:1 

< 

UJ 


CSj 

h- 

O 

_i 

□_ 

I — 

o 

_J 

Q_ 


CK 

< 

l_U 


oooooooooo 

ocot^coin^t-ioiNT- 


SiOOd  IVZIHddOOAH  ^ 


Figure  6 Mycorrhizal  development  in  inoculated  and  uninoculated  silver-berry  outplanted 
in  reconstructed  soil  for  two  growing  seasons.  Data  are  means  ± SO. 


62 


Table  23.  Plant  growth,  nodulation,  and  vesicular-arbuscular  mycor- 
rhizal  development  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated  buffalo- 
berry  outplanted  for  1 year  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site.  Data  are  means 
(n=10)  ± SO.i 


Measurement 

Inoculated 

(+/-) 

Plot  1 
(tailings  + 
peat) 

Plot  2 
(tai lings , 
peat  -1-  clay) 

Row 

X 

Survival(%) 

+ 

48 

40 

- 

75 

53 

Shoot  height  (cm) 

10  ± 6 

14  ± 6 

12.0‘> 

- 

6.5  ± 2 

10  ± 3 

8.3a 

Column 

X 

8.25^ 

12.0b 

Shoot  weight 

0.67  ± 0.72 

1 ,04  ± 0.91 

0.86*5 

(g  dry  planf^) 

— 

- 

0.15  ± 0,07 

0.29  ± 0.21 

0.22a 

Column 

X 

0.41^ 

0.67b 

Root  weight 

+ 

0.30  ± 0.21 

0.47  ± 0.30 

0.39*5 

(g  dry  plant"^) 

_ 

- 

0.14  ± 0.06 

0.18  ± 0,07 

0.16® 

Column 

X 

0.223 

0.33b 

Nodules 

22  ± 21 

34  ± 32 

28.03 

(no.  plant~^) 

- 

12  ± 8 

21  ± 13 

16.53 

Column 

X 

173 

27.53 

Nodules 

+ 

0.26  ± 0.26 

0.41  ± 0.36 

0.34*5 

(g  wet  plant"^) 

- 

0.03  ± 0.03 

0.08  ± 0.07 

0.063 

Column 

X 

0.153 

0.25b 

Mycorrhizal  root 

+ 

64  ± 21 

57  ± 28 

61*5 

length  (%)  (n=5) 

_ 

- 

24  ± 17 

28  ± 7 

263 

Column 

X 

443 

433 

^ Data  analyzed  by  two-way  ANOVA  and  differences  detected  by  Scheffe 
multiple  contrasts  for  pairwise  comparisons.  Shoot  height,  shoot 
weight,  root  weight,  nodule  number  and  nodule  weight  data  were  LN 
transformed.  MSE's  are  0.171,  0.657,  0,331,  0.933,  0.885  and  383.5 
for  each  measurement  in  sequential  order.  Values  for  row  or  column 
means  for  each  measurement  followed  by  the  same  letter  are  not 
significantly  different  (p  = 0.05). 


63 


uninoculated  buf falo-berry  after  one  growing  season  (Table  23, 
Figures  7 to  10).  This  pattern  was  carried  over  into  the  second 
growing  season  when  inoculated  shrubs  were  still  significantly  taller, 
heavier  and  more  heavily  nodulated  and  mycorrhizal  than  the 
uninoculated  shrubs  (Table  24,  Figures  7 to  10). 

In  contrast  to  the  si  1 ver-berry,  where  very  few  significant 
differences  were  detected  between  plot  treatments,  many  of  the  measure- 
ments made  on  buffalo-berry  were  significantly  affected  by  the  type  of 
amendment  applied  to  the  tailings  sand.  After  one  growing  season, 
shoot  heights  and  weights,  root  weights  and  nodule  weights  per  plant 
were  significantly  greater  for  seedlings  planted  in  the  tailings  sand 
amended  with  peat  and  clay  (Plot  2)  than  for  seedlings  planted  in 
tailings  sand  amended  with  peat  only  (Plot  1)  (Table  23).  Mycorrhizal 
infection  was  not  affected. 

4.4.4  Relationships  Amongst  Various  Parameters  Measured  on 

Inoculated  and  Uninoculated  Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry 

After  One  and  Two  Growing  Seasons 

Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  were  calcu- 
lated to  determine  if  any  strong  relationships  existed  between  plant 
performance  and  the  mycorrhizal/nodulation  status  of  the  roots.  After 
one  growing  season  there  were  high  correlations  between  silver-berry 
shoot  weights  and  nodule  numbers  (coefficient  = 0.947)  and  shoot 
weights  and  nodule  weights  (coefficient  = 0.912)  (Table  25).  Shoot 
productivity  appeared  to  be  more  closely  related  to  nodule  status  than 
mycorrhizal  status  (coeff icient  = 0.628) . Also,  percent  mycorrhizal 
root  length  was  not  closely  correlated  with  nodule  number  and  weight. 
Neither  shoot  productivity  nor  symbiont  development  exhibited  strong 
correlations  with  foliage  nutrient  (N  and  P)  status.  Correlation 
coefficients  calculated  for  silver-berry  data  collected  after  the 
second  growing  season  followed  the  same  pattern  as  that  observed  for 
the  first  year  data  with  strong  correlations  still  present  between 
nodule  weights  and  shoot  and  root  weights,  but  not  between  % mycor- 
rhizal roots  and  shoot  and  root  weights  (Table  26). 

A linear  regression  of  the  silver-berry  shoot  weights  vs 
nodule  weights  for  the  first  year  data  is  presented  in  Figure  11,  and 


64 


(FNO)  iHOGH  lOOHS 


Figure  7 Shoot  heights  (±  SD)  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated  buffalo-berry  outplanted 
in  reconstructed  soil  for  two  growing  seasons. 


65 


OOOCD'^CNOOOCDtJ-CNIO 

CM  •«-  -r-  1-  t-  r- 


C\| 

(H 

< 

LJ 


cr 

< 

UJ 


(O)  1H0I3M  lOOHS 


Figure  8 Shoot  weights  (±  SO)  of  inoculated  and  uninoculated  buffalo-berry  outplanted 
in  reconstructed  soil  for  two  growing  seasons. 


□ UNINOCULATED 
W INOCULATED 


66 


' " I 

ro 


— — , — 

CM  ^ O 


(iNvid/o)  s3inaoN 


0 • 

o 

s_ 

i-  +i 
0^ 

^ 1/1 

1 c 
O to 

I—  Oi 
H3  E 


u-  o> 
3 i- 
ja  (O 


*o  (O 
<U  4-> 
fO 
rO  O 


<_> 

O 

C C 
•1“  O 
C 
3 

0) 

■O  </» 


<T3  on 

c 

■o  «r~ 

<u  3 
-«->  o 
<o  i- 
CT 
3 

U O 

o 3 


c o 


C -f- 

<x>  o 
E «/> 
o. 

o *o 

f—  0> 

<U 

> o 

<U  3 

•o  s- 

■M 


<r> 


<u 


100 


67 


oooooooooo 

oioDh'Coin'^rocM^ 


CM 

cr 

< 

UJ 


q: 

< 

LU 


SiOOd  nVZIHddOOAn  % 


Figure  10  Mycorrhizal  development  in  inoculated  and  uninoculated  buffalo-berry  outplanted 
in  reconstructed  soil  for  two  growing  seasons.  Data  are  means  ± SD. 


68 


Table  24.  Plant  growth,  nodulation  and  vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal 
development  in  inoculated  and  uninoculated  buffalo-berry 
outplanted  for  2 years  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site.  Data  are  means 
(n  = 7)  ± SO.i 


Treatment 


Measurement  Uninoculated  Inoculated 


Shoot  height  (cm) 

Shoot  weight 
(g  dry  plant"^) 

Root  weight 
(g  dry  planf^) 

Root  collar  diameter  (mm) 

Branches 

(number  plant  ~^) 

Nodule  weight 
(g  wet  planf^) 

Mycorrhizal  roots  (%) 


13.4  ± 6.73 

1.8  ± 2.2^ 

0.6  ± 0.5a 
3.2  ± 0.9a 

10  ± 9.9a 

0.3  ± 0.5a 
46  ± 33a 


25.5  ± 9.9b 

7.5  + 8.0b 

2.0  ± 1.5b 

5.7  + 2.0b 

23  ± 263 

1 .0  ± 1 .13 
83  + 9.5b 


1 Data  analyzed  by  a two  sample  T-test.  Shoot  weight,  root  weight 
and  nodule  weight  data  were  LO  transformed.  Values  in  each  row 
followed  by  the  same  letter  are  not  significantly  different  (p  = 0.05). 


Table  25.  Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  for  various  parameters  measured  on 
silver-berry  grown  for  1 year  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots 
at  the  Syncrude  site. 


69 


Q. 

o 

r— 

CM 

Z 

00 

o 

00 

<u 

- 

o 

fO 

N 

•r— 

JZ 

r— > 

CO 

i_ 

r~ 

s_ 

o 

'3- 

o 

. 

. 

o 

r— 

o 

o 

>> 

(U 

•<-» 

in 

00 

in 

r— ’ 

J3 

i£) 

CO 

CD 

3 

Ol 

o 

in 

CO 

-3- 

■o 

•1— 

• 

. 

. 

. 

o 

(U 

r— 

O 

o 

o 

z 

3 

Qi 

S- 

r— 

<u 

o 

r~ 

•«3- 

3 

in 

00 

o 

CO 

•a 

E 

o 

CD 

"cr 

in 

o 

3 

. 

z 

Z 

O 

CD 

o 

O 

4-» 

<y> 

vJ3 

'a- 

'3' 

+-» 

f— 

o 

00 

in 

o 

•1— 

o 

<T» 

CD 

lO 

CO 

'3- 

o 

<u 

3 

O 

O 

o 

o 

O 

+-» 

+-> 

JZ 

f— 

CO 

in 

CO 

00 

o 

Ol 

CD 

CD 

1— 

in 

o 

•f— 

o 

P- 

r- 

r* 

CO 

x: 

> 

. 

00 

z 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

4-» 

■H 

f— = 

03 

r> 

CM 

00 

CM 

o 

o 

CJ> 

CM 

f— 

CM 

CM 

JO 

o 

•r” 

O 

OD 

CD 

<D 

JO 

^3- 

'3- 

.c 

CU 

* 

. 

00 

3 

o 

o 

O 

O 

O 

O 

O 

i. 

-P 

<U 

+-> 

0) 

x: 

fO 

.3 

JZ 

■p 

JZ 

CD 

N 

JZ 

E 

•r- 

•r“ 

•r" 

Ol 

3 

<U 

.Z 

z 

Q- 

0) 

<U 

•f— 

C 

3 

3 

JZ 

0) 

i. 

•p 

-P 

3 

<U 

(U 

o 

o 

O 

■P 

4-> 

r“ 

r— 

u 

o 

O 

o 

O 

■p 

3 

3 

>» 

.z 

xz 

o 

O 

o 

-o 

■o 

s; 

00 

00 

JZ 

JZ 

o 

O 

O 

00 

00 

QC 

z 

z 

Table  26.  Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  for  various  parameters  measured  on 

silver-berry  grown  for  2 years  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots 
at  the  Syncrude  site. 


70 


o> 

fd 

M 

0|-0 

JZ 

o 

4- 

4- 

o 

o 

>J 

5: 

</> 

0) 

"d- 

.c 

00 

o 

o 

CO 

c: 

. 

fO 

r— 

o 

4. 

03 

i- 

(0 

1— “ 

4- 

(U 

f— 

CO 

o 

•P 

o 

CM 

CO 

u 

(U 

o 

00 

•d- 

E 

. 

fO 

r— 

O 

O 

o 

o 

o 

cn 

<u 

■p 

f— 

jC 

vX 

CM 

f— 

3 

cn 

o 

00 

d“ 

"O 

•r" 

o 

P-= 

00 

CO 

o 

0) 

. 

. 

. 

. 

z 

3 

o 

o 

o 

■P 

JZ 

r— 

CO 

CM 

cr» 

cn 

00 

00 

cO 

00 

o 

«!“ 

o 

00 

00 

00 

CM 

o 

Q> 

3 

o 

o 

O 

o 

"P 

.c 

m 

CO 

o 

o 

cn 

C\J 

00 

1— 

o 

«p- 

o 

X) 

00 

00 

cu 

(/) 

31 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

■P 

-p 

x: 

o 

vX 

00 

o 

vX 

CO 

o 

o 

f— 

m 

r” 

r» 

o 

•1“ 

o 

CO 

<T> 

00 

cr> 

CO 

.c 

(U 

. 

. 

e 

. 

c 

. 

00 

3 

o 

O 

o 

O 

O 

o 

4- 

<U 

P 

0) 

E 

fO 

“r- 

•p 

•o 

OJ 

+-» 

x: 

fd 

x: 

x: 

■P 

Oi 

4- 

ISJ 

o> 

o? 

x: 

•1“ 

«d 

•r— 

•f~ 

•r“ 

o? 

<U 

t— 

.C 

<u 

(U 

3 

1/) 

4_ 

3 

x: 

(U 

o 

<u 

4- 

3 

0) 

u 

sz 

O 

■p 

■p 

u 

u 

o 

o 

-P 

3 

p 

ez 

>> 

o 

o 

o 

•o 

o 

fd 

5: 

JZ 

JZ 

o 

O 

o 

4- 

00 

00 

oc 

z 

0£ 

00 

71 


Figure  11  Linear  regression  of  shoot  weights  versus  nodule  weights  for 
one  year-old  silverberry. 


72 


illustrates  the  very  close  relationship  (r^  = 0.89)  between  nodu- 
lation  and  shoot  performance.  This  relationship  was  continued  into  the 
second  growing  season  when  the  regression  equation  was  LN  SHOOT  WEIGHT 
(MG)  = 1.92  + 1.11  (LN  NODULE  WEIGHT  (MG))  and  the  r^  was  0.91. 

Correlation  coefficients  for  the  buffalo-berry  parameters 
followed  a very  similar  pattern  to  those  calculated  for  the 
silver-berry  data.  Relationships  between  shoot  weight  or  root  weight 
and  nodule  weight  were  high  (0.82  and  0.72  for  shoot  and  root  vs 
nodules,  respectively)  after  the  first  growing  season  (Table  27)  and 
very  high  during  the  second  growing  season  (0.96  and  0.95  for  shoot  and 
root  vs  nodule  weights,  respectively) (Table  28).  As  was  the  case  for 
the  si  1 ver-berry,  the  correlation  between  % mycorrhizal  root  length  and 
shoot  weight  was  low  (0.58  and  0.31  for  years  1 and  2,  respectively)  as 
was  the  correlation  between  % mycorrhizal  root  length  and  nodule 
weights  (0.57  and  0.26  for  years  1 and  2,  respectively).  The  close 
relationship  between  nodulation  and  shoot  production  of  buffalo-berry 
during  the  first  growing  season  is  exemplified  in  the  linear  regression 
presented  in  Figure  12.  The  relationship  during  the  second  growing 
season  was  even  stronger  with  the  regression  equation  being  LN  SHOOT 
WEIGHT  (HG)  = 1.97  + 0.996  (LN  NODULE  WEIGHT  (MG))  and  the  being 


0.93. 


Table  27.  Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  for  various  parameters 

measured  on  buf falo-berry  grown  for  1 year  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil 
reconstruction  plots  at  the  Syncrude  site. 


73 


0) 

rO 

Nl 

•1“ 

sz 

o 

^ s- 

• 

o 

1— > 

o 

>. 

0)  4-> 

•X 

1—  x: 

X 

O 

X 

•O  •!— 

. 

o <u 

r— 

o 

Z 3 

<3)  i- 

r-  <D 

CO 

f— 

3 X> 

un 

■a  E 

o 

r~ 

O 3 

. 

2 2 

' 

O 

o 

+-> 

05 

X 

CO 

CT> 

r— " 

in 

X 

O •!- 

o 

05 

'O' 

O O) 

. 

. 

« 

• 

3 

o 

o 

o 

•p  x: 

r* 

o 

X 

O 05 

r— 

r“ 

X 

CM 

o •!- 

o 

•X 

r~ 

X 

'O' 

.3  (U 

• 

. 

f— “ 

o 

o 

o 

d 

■p 

+-» 

CO 

X 

O 05 

cn 

n 

C\J 

r~ 

r* 

O •!— 

o 

05 

CD 

cr> 

X 

0> 

^ 3 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

-p 

05 

-p 

■p 

05 

x: 

(T3 

.3 

JZ 

•p 

Xi 

05 

M 

05 

05 

XT 

E 

•t— 

•f” 

•1— 

05 

3 

05 

05 

05 

•t— 

3 

3 

i- 

3 

.3 

05 

L. 

3 

05 

0) 

O 

■p 

■P 

r— 

u 

o 

o 

3 

3 

>> 

o 

o 

o 

-o 

TO 

s: 

JZ 

.3 

o 

o 

o 

(50 

q: 

2 

2 

Table  28.  Pearson  product  moment  correlation  coefficients  for  various  parameters  measured  on 

buf falo-berry  grown  for  2 years  in  the  University  of  Calgary  soil  reconstruction  plots 
at  the  Syncrude  site. 


74 


4_ 

^ i. 
o 
u 
>> 


to 

I—  s_ 

<—  <D 
O -H 
O <D 

E 

+->  fO 

o «<— 

O Q 
cn 


o 

'sr 

O CM 
r-^  O 


un 

^ un 


=J  CJ^ 
“O  T- 

O O) 


m c\j  (— 
O 00  cvj 

O 00  00  rg 

r-  o O O 


■P  on 
O "t- 
O <U 
QO  3 


CO 

O 

on 

un 

CO 

on 

on 

v£> 

CO 

O 

O 

O 

o 

-M  JZ 

O o» 

O 'r- 
JO  0) 

uo  a: 


^ o 
00  on  r» 


f—  o o o o o 


+-> 

CO 

'S- 

on 

vO 

vO 

o 

O) 

o 

un 

r~ 

on 

o 

o 

•r- 

O 

00 

on 

on 

on 

OO 

CO 

OJ 

. 

. 

• 

. 

. 

. 

3 

o 

O 

O 

O 

o 

o 

L. 

CU 

+-> 

0) 

E 

■M 

T3 

0> 

4-i 

+-» 

JC 

(T3 

JZ 

JZ 

-M 

on 

M 

on 

on 

•r” 

to 

»r— 

•r” 

“f” 

on 

0> 

r— > 

CU 

0) 

•r” 

3 

r— 

i/n 

i- 

3 

<D 

o 

0> 

i- 

3 

a> 

u 

jC 

o 

+j 

f— ■ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

■H 

=j 

+-> 

c: 

>n 

o 

o 

O 

■o 

o 

to 

s: 

O 

o 

o 

c/) 

00 

QO 

z 

QO 

00 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

0 

( 

12 


75 


BUFFALO-BERRY 

Shoot  weight  = 2.531  + 0.718  (Nodule  weight ) 

= 0.88 


. I t \ I \ ^ \ ^ L 

123456789  10 

LN  NODULE  WEIGHT  (MG) 

Linear  regression  of  shoot  weights  versus  nodule  weights 
for  one  year-old  buffalo-berry. 


76 


5.  DISCUSSION 

5.1  MYCORRHIZAL  STATUS  OF  WOODY  SHRUBS 

Members  of  the  Rosaceae  are  considered  to  be  strictly 
vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  (Trappe,  1981);  thus  it  was  to  be 
expected  that  both  cinquefoil  and  saskatoon-berry  would  bear 
VAM-colonized  roots.  Silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  were  also  found  to 
be  exclusively  VA  mycorrhizal  contrary  to  observations  made  by  Rose 
(1980)  that  buf falo-berry  was  both  VA  and  ectomycorrhi zal . All  of  the 
plants  sampled  were  mycorrhizal  emphasizing  the  fact  that,  in  the  wild, 
the  mycorrhizal  condition  is  the  norm.  The  high  level  of  VAM  coloni- 
zation in  some  of  the  plants  is  indicative  of  a potentially  high 
dependence  by  woody  shrubs  on  the  VAM  symbiont. 

5.2  JUSTIFICATION  FOR  INOCULATION  OF  CONTAINERIZED  SILVER-BERRY 

AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

5.2.1  The  Dependency  of  Silver-berry  and  Buf falo-berry  on  their 

Mycorrhizal  and  N2-fixing  Symbionts 

Mycorrhizal  dependency  is  expressed  as  the  dry  weight  of  a 
mycorrhizal  plant  as  a percentage  of  the  dry  weight  of  a nonmycorrhi zal 
plant  at  a given  level  of  soil  fertility  (Menge  et  al.,  1982).  Under 
the  low  nutrient  regimes  used  in  this  experiment  (plants  were  not 
fertilized  and  previous  experiments  revealed  that  N and  P contents  of 
muskeg  peat  were  so  low  that  plants  responded  strongly  to  the  addition 
of  NPK  fertilizer)  the  mycorrhizal  dependencies  of  silver-berry  and 
buffalo-berry  were  368%  and  727%,  respectively. 

Soil  collected  from  beneath  buf falo-berry  shrubs  was  used  as 
inoculum  in  this  study;  consequently,  the  relative  contributions  of  the 
N2-fixing  Frankia  and  the  VA  mycorrhizal  fungus  in  stimulating  plant 
growth  could  not  be  ascertained.  However,  based  on  the  numerous  studies 
conducted  on  the  Rhi zobi um-VAM-1 equme  symbiosis,  it  appears  that  the 
VAM  relationship  is  necessary  to  satisfy  the  high  P demand  of  the  nodu- 
lation  and  N2-fixation  processes  (Barea  and  Azcon-Agui lar,  1983). 

The  high  dependence  of  buffalo-berry  and  silver-berry  on  their 
symbionts  suggests  that  early  colonization  by  Frankia  and  the  VAM  fungi 


77 


is  essential  to  ensure  plant  success  in  both  natural  and  disturbed  soil 
systems.  In  regards  to  the  revegetation  of  oil  sands  tailings,  it  is 
apparent  that  the  growth  performance  of  buf falo-berry  and  silver-berry 
would  be  significantly  better  if  the  shrubs  were  mycorrhizal  and  nodu- 
lated prior  to  outplanting  or  if  they  were  outplanted  into  soil  with  a 
high  inoculum  potential. 

5,2.2  Levels  of  VA  Mycorrhizal  Inoculum  in  Various  Soils  in  the  Oil 
Sands  Region  and  Effects  of  Stockpiling  on  VAM  Infectivitv 
The  VA  mycorrhizal  inoculum  potential  in  a soil  is  dependent 
to  a large  extent  on  the  mycorrhizal  host  plants  in  a specific  site  and 
on  the  degree  of  disturbance  of  the  soil.  Sites  dominated  by 
ectomycorrhizal  conifers  or  ericaceous  species  (ericoid  mycorrhizae) 
would  be  expected  to  lack  VAM  inoculum  due  to  the  lack  of  VA  hosts. 
For  example,  Kovacic  et  al.  (1984)  found  that  VAM  spores  and 
mycorrhizal  colonization  were  extremely  low  in  a Ponderosa  pine  forest 
in  Colorado  compared  with  a similar  forest  which  had  been  killed  and 
colonized  by  VA  herbs  and  grasses.  Severe  soil  disturbance,  such  as 
that  which  occurs  during  mining,  has  been  shown  to  significantly  reduce 
VAM  inoculum  potential  (Allen  and  Allen,  1980;  Moorman  and  Reeves, 
1979;  Mott  and  Zuberer,  1987;  Zak  and  Parkinson,  1982).  Loss  of  VAM 
inoculum  potential  or  reduced  rates  of  mycorrhizal  colonization  as  a 
result  of  topsoil  storage  during  surface  mining  has  also  been  reported 
(Gould  and  Liberta,  1981;  Miller  et  al,  1984;  Rives  et  al,  1980;  Visser 
et  al,  1984;  Warner,  1983).  Lack  of  VAM  inoculum  in  a minespoil  may 
necessitate  emendation  with  soil  having  a high  inoculum  potential  in 
order  to  ensure  establishment  and  growth  of  outplanted  seedlings. 

Both  undisturbed  and  stockpiled  muskeg  on  the  Syncrude  lease 
contained  negligible  quantities  of  VAM  inoculum.  This  is  not  surpri- 
sing since  the  vegetation  in  undisturbed  muskeg  is  often  dominated  by 
non-VA  hosts  such  as  tamarack,  black  spruce  and  ericaceous  plants. 
Both  tamarack  and  black  spruce  are  hosts  for  ectomycorrhizae  while  the 
Ericales  form  arbutoid  or  ericoid-type  mycorrhizae.  The  fungi  involved 
in  the  formation  of  ectomycorrhizae  and  arbutoid  or  ericoid-type  mycor- 
rhizae are  taxonomical ly  very  different  from  those  which  form  VA  mycor- 
rhizae. 


78 


c 


Although  many  of  the  plant  species  in  the  undisturbed  muskeg 
were  non-VA  hosts,  VA  inoculum  did  occur  in  areas  where  VA  hosts 
(grasses)  were  present.  However,  compared  with  mixed  woodland  soil 
where  64%  mycorrhizal  colonization  was  attained  after  12  weeks  growth, 
the  infectivity  potential  of  the  peat,  even  when  originally  occupied  by 
a VA  host,  was  poor.  Interestingly,  VA  inoculum,  albeit  low,  was  also 
present  in  the  50-100  cm  deep  undisturbed  peat  which  was  well  below  the 
rooting  zone  for  most  species.  In  a survey  of  VA  inoculum  in  a peat 
deposit  formed  under  a white  spruce  stand,  Danielson,  Zak  and  Parkinson 
(1984)  also  reported  viable  VA  inoculum  down  to  a depth  of  100  cm. 

No  impact  of  stockpiling  on  VAM  infectivity  was  recorded  due 
to  the  lack  of  inoculum  in  the  peat  prior  to  stockpiling.  Mycorrhizal 
infectivity  was  low  in  the  stockpiled  peat,  but  increased  by  10  to  12% 
when  the  stockpile  was  vegetated  with  grass  for  6 years  indicating  a 
very  slow  rate  of  increase  in  inoculum  levels,  even  in  the  presence  of 
VAM  hosts. 

The  importance  of  the  mycorrhizal  symbiosis  in  stimulating 
plant  growth  in  the  peat  stockpiled  for  8 months  was  evidenced  in 
greater  shoot  and  root  production  by  slender  wheatgrass  when  a VAM 
fungus  was  artificially  introduced  to  the  peat.  Some  of  the  P defi- 
ciency symptoms  (deep  green  to  purple  leaves)  noted  for  plants  grown  in 
the  uninoculated  peat  appeared  to  be  partially  alleviated  by  VAM  infec- 
tion. Although  mycorrhizal  infection  stimulated  plant  production, 

10  week  old  plants  were  still  extremely  small.  Low  rates  of  fertiliza- 
tion (15  mg  N L~^)  substantially  improved  shoot  production,  but  in 
the  presence  of  fertilizer,  VAM  colonization  did  not  have  a significant 
effect  on  shoot  weights.  Numerous  studies  have  demonstrated  that, 
under  conditions  where  nutrients  are  not  limiting  to  non-mycorrhi zal 
plants,  growth  stimulation  due  to  mycorrhizal  inoculation  is  lost 
(Abbott  and  Robson,  1984).  This  becomes  particularly  evident  when 
comparing  phosphate  response  curves  (i.e.  phosphorus  applied  versus 
dry  weight  of  plant  produced)  for  mycorrhizal  and  non-mycorrhizal 
plants  (Abbott  and  Robson,  1984). 

It  appears,  therefore,  that  undisturbed  muskeg  peat  and  stock- 
piled peat  used  in  the  reclamation  of  the  Syncrude  tailings  dykes  have 
neglible  quantities  of  VAM  inoculum  while  soil  in  mixed  aspen  white 


79 


spruce  woodlands  exhibit  high  infectivity.  The  lack  of  VAM  inoculum  in 
stockpiled  peat  and  the  potential  benefits  derived  by  the  plant  if 
inoculum  is  introduced  into  the  growing  medium  suggests  that,  when 
revegetating  tailings  sand  with  highly  symbiont-dependent  shrubs  such 
as  buf falo-berry  and  si  1 ver-berry,  attempts  should  be  made  to  ensure 
that  containerized  seedlings  are  inoculated  with  their  symbionts  prior 
to  outplanting.  Alternatively,  the  tailings  could  be  amended  with 
inoculum-rich  soil,  possibly  mixed  woodland  soil.  The  former  approach 
would  be  more  economically  feasible  that  the  second. 

5.2.3  Mvcorrhizal  and  Nodule  Status  of  Containerized  Shrubs  Raised 

in  Various  Commercial  Nurseries  in  Alberta  and  British  Columbia 

The  practice  of  raising  seedlings  in  containers  or  nursery 
beds  offers  an  opportunity  to  manage  both  mycorrhizal  and  N2-fixing 
symbionts  by  allowing  artificial  inoculation  with  selected  symbionts 
prior  to  outplanting.  Mycorrhizal  inoculation  of  sterilized  nursery 
soil  has  been  demonstrated  to  significantly  improve  the  growth  of  a 
range  of  woody  plant  species  including  fruit  trees  (particularly 
citrus),  timber  trees  and  ornamentals  (Powell,  1984).  As  a result  of 
this,  mycorrhizal  inoculation  of  nursery-grown  citrus  is  now  a common 
practice  in  the  U.S.  (Powell,  1984).  The  growth  response  of  various 
actinorhizal  plants,  especially  alder,  to  Frankia  inoculation  has 
resulted  in  large  scale  inoculation  of  these  plants  in  Quebec  (Perinet 
et  al.,  1985). 

While  in  the  greenhouse,  containerized  seedlings  can  become 
colonized  by  either  the  VA-mycorrhi zal  fungi  or  N2-fixing  bacteria 
residing  in  the  planting  mixture  (unless  it  is  sterilized),  the  atmos- 
phere or  the  water.  However,  a survey  of  woody  shrubs  grown  in  Alberta 
and  B.C.  nurseries  revealed  that  containerized  seedlings  seldom  become 
mycorrhizal  or  nodulated  during  the  first  year  of  growth.  If  the  seed- 
lings are  older  than  one  year  and  have  spent  some  time  in  the  shade- 
house  or  outdoors  they  may  become  mycorrhizal  or  nodulated  but  not 
necessarily  so.  The  slow  rates  of  mycorrhi zation  and  nodulation  in  the 
nurseries  may  be  a result  of  a combination  of  factors  including  high 
fertilizer  regimes  (which  inhibit  symbiont  development),  a lack  of 
symbiont  inoculum  and  inefficient  dispersal  of  inoculum  from  adjacent 


80 


inoculum  sources.  Regardless  of  the  reasons  for  poor  symbiont  develop- 
ment in  the  nurseries,  it  can  be  concluded  that  containerized  shrubs 
outplanted  when  less  than  one  year  old  (which  is  the  situation  for  most 
greenhouse  operations)  will  be  symbiont-free  and,  therefore,  completely 
dependent  on  the  inoculum  present  in  the  reconstructed  soil  in  which 
they  are  planted.  The  low  inoculum  potential  of  reconstructed  soil  on 
the  tailings  sands  dykes  combined  with  the  high  dependency  of  woody 
plants  on  their  symbionts  suggests  that  woody  species  used  in  the 
revegetation  of  the  oil  sands,  and  possibly  other  disturbed  areas, 
would  benefit  greatly  from  artificial  inoculation. 

Silver-berry,  buf falo-berry  and  silver  buffalo-berry  surveyed 
in  this  study  were  often  underweight  and  chlorotic  - a condition  which 
may  have  been  partially  due  to  the  poor  development  of  N2-fixing 
nodules. 

5.2.4  Mvcorrhization  and  Nodulation  Rates  of  Buffalo-berry  and 

Silver-berry  in  the  Greenhouse  and  the  Field 

The  rapidity  with  which  an  uninoculated  actinorhizal  shrub 
seedling  becomes  mycorrhizal  and  nodulated  after  outplanting  will 
determine  to  a large  degree  the  benefits  it  will  gain  from  the  symbio- 
sis during  the  first  growing  season.  A short  growing  season  and  low 
symbiont  inoculum  potential  are  two  factors  which  could  reduce  rates  of 
infection  to  such  an  extent  that  seedlings  would  not  benefit  from  their 
symbionts  until  the  second  growing  season,  if  they  survive  the  winter. 
Artificial  inoculation  would  ensure  that  a seedling  derived  maximum 
benefit  from  its  symbionts  immediately  after  outplanting. 

Buffalo-berry  raised  in  amended  tailings  sand  exhibited  signi- 
ficantly slower  rates  of  mycorrhi zation  and  a lower  degree  of  mycor- 
rhizal colonization  than  did  seedlings  grown  in  mixed  woodland  soil, 
presumably  a result  of  lower  inoculum  levels  in  the  tailings  sand. 
Under  ideal  conditions  in  the  greenhouse,  plants  in  the  amended 
tailings  sand  did  not  become  mycorrhizal  or  obviously  nodulated  until 
eight  weeks  after  planting.  Since  rates  of  colonization  would  be 
expected  to  be  much  slower  in  the  field  than  in  the  greenhouse  and 
since  the  growing  season  in  the  oil  sands  region  is  short,  it  is 
doubtful  that  containerized  shrubs  would  gain  much  from  the  symbiosis 


81 


during  the  first  growing  season  after  outplanting  in  reconstructed  soil 
unless  they  were  artificially  inoculated. 

The  relatively  rapid  mycorrhi zation  of  silver-berry  seedlings 
outplanted  on  the  Suncor  dyke  in  June  can  be  explained  by  the  predomi- 
nance of  VAM  hosts  which  were  no  doubt  instrumental  in  raising  the 
level  of  VAM  inoculum  in  the  reconstructed  soil.  However,  compared  with 
seedlings  outplanted  in  a mixed  woodland,  seedlings  on  the  dyke 
exhibited  very  poor  nodulation  over  the  growing  season.  This  may  have 
been  due  to  a lack  of  Frankia  inoculum  in  the  reconstructed  soil  or  due 
to  very  poor  root  growth  out  of  the  planting  plug.  The  lack  of  both 
shoot  and  root  growth  during  the  term  of  the  study  is  difficult  to 
explain,  and  should,  perhaps  be  investigated  further.  The  high  rate  of 
mortality  of  seedlings  outplanted  in  the  Suncor  plot  revegetated  in 
1974  may  have  been  a result  of  intense  competition  by  sweet  clover. 
Results  from  the  field  trial  supported  those  obtained  in  the  greenhouse 
and  form  a strong  basis  for  considering  artificial  inoculation  of 
containerized  seedlings. 

5.2.5  Basis  for  Artificial  Inoculation  of  Containerized  Buffalo- 

berry  and  Silver-berry  for  Outplanting  on  Amended  Oil  Sands 

Tailings 

It  appears  that  artificial  inoculation  of  containerized 
buffalo-berry  and  silver-berry  is  justified  for  the  following  reasons: 

1.  Silver-berry  and  buf falo-berry  are  heavily  dependent  on 
their  symbionts  as  evidenced  by  the  significant  growth 
response  when  they  are  inoculated  with  Frankia  and  VAM 
fungi . 

2.  Mycorrhizal  inoculum  is  lacking  in  the  reconstructed  soil 
causing  rates  of  nodulation  and  mycorrhi zation  to  be  so 
slow  that  containerized  seedlings  would  benefit  tremen- 
dously if  armed  with  their  symbionts  when  outplanted. 

3.  Containerized  seedlings  seldom  become  mycorrhizal  or 
nodulated  while  in  the  nursery,  and  are,  therefore, 
virtually  symbiont-free  if  outplanted  within  a year  of 
being  seeded. 


82 


5.3  DEVELOPMENT  OF  A GROWING  REGIME  FOR  GREENHOUSE  PRODUCTION  OF 

MYCORRHIZAL,  NODULATED  SILVER-BERRY  AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

5.3.1  Fertilization  Regimes 

Many  factors,  including  the  type  of  growing  medium,  water/ 
aeration  conditions,  pH,  light  intensity  and  photoperiod,  temperature, 
container  size  and  pesticide  or  herbicide  applications  can  signifi- 
cantly influence  the  infectivity  of  symbiont  inoculum  (Menge,  1984). 
However,  the  factor  which  appears  to  have  the  greatest  influence  is  the 
fertilization  regime.  It  is  now  widely  accepted  that  high  available  P 
levels  in  the  soil  can  severely  inhibit  mycorrhizal  infection  due  to  an 
increase  in  the  P content  of  the  host  tissue  (Cooper,  1984).  High 
concentrations  of  N fertilizer  can  also  reduce  mycorrhizal  formation 
particularly  if  the  N is  in  the  ammonium  form  (Cooper,  1984;  Menge, 
1984).  Consequently,  in  order  to  produce  mycorrhizal,  nodulated  seed- 
lings of  suitable  size  and  quality  for  outplanting,  it  is  necessary  to 
develop  fertilization  regimes  which  will  maximize  both  plant  production 
and  mycorrhizal  development. 

Fertilizer  studies  on  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  grown  in 
woodland  soil  and  reconstructed  soil,  revealed  that  for  both  species  of 
shrub,  fertilizer  applications  in  excess  of  200  mg  L 28-14-14  (i.e. 

56  mg  N,  12  mg  P,  23  mg  K)  severely  reduced  mycorrhizal  and  nodule 
development.  Plant  response  to  fertilization  was  greater  in  the  recon- 
structed soil  than  in  the  woodland  soil,  presumably  because  the  recon- 
structed soil  was  more  nutrient -poor  and  lacked  the  symbiont  inoculum 
required  to  compensate  for  the  low  N and  P levels.  Nodulation  and 
mycorrhization  were  significantly  less  in  the  reconstructed  soil  than 
in  the  woodland  soil  due  to  lower  inoculum  levels  in  the  reconstructed 
soi  1 . 

High  N concentrations  in  the  soil  inhibit  nodulation  (Bond 
et  al.,  1954;  MacConnell  and  Bond,  1957)  whereas  high  P concentrations 
in  the  plant  inhibit  mycorrhization  (Cooper,  1984).  Mycorrhization  did 
not  appear  to  be  as  sensitive  to  the  concentrations  of  NHa-N  and  P 
used  in  this  study  as  was  nodulation.  At  the  higher  fertilizer  regime 
the  dependence  of  the  shrubs  on  their  symbionts  was  lost  due  to  greater 
availability  of  nutrients  in  the  soil  solution. 


83 


Under  the  conditions  set  forth  in  this  study,  fertilization  at 
a rate  of  200  mg  L ^ 28-14-14  for  20  weeks  produced  a seedling  whose 
shoot  weight  was  very  similar  to  that  produced  at  the  400  mg  rate,  but 
whose  root  system  exhibited  wel 1 -developed  mycorrhizae  and  nodules. 

5.3.2  Container  Volume 

As  expected,  plant  performance  in  the  150  cc  containers  was 
much  superior  to  that  in  the  65  cc  containers.  That  inoculated 
silver-berry  grown  in  150  cc  containers  exhibited  a symbiont  growth 
response  whereas  inoculated  seedlings  in  65  cc  containers  did  not,  is 
probably  related  to  root  density  and  the  volume  of  soil  available  for 
exploitation  by  the  symbionts.  Baath  and  Hayman  (1984)  observed  that 
the  mycorrhizal  growth  response  of  onions  was  highly  dependent  on 
container  size  and  plant  density  in  each  container.  As  the  soil  volume 
was  reduced  there  was  a concomitant  decrease  in  mycorrhizal  growth 
response.  Danielson,  Griffiths  and  Parkinson  (1984)  suggested  that  the 
high  root  density  which  may  develop  in  small  containers  could  reduce 
the  effectiveness  of  the  mycorrhizae,  since  the  roots  themselves  would 
efficiently  exploit  the  soil  for  nutrients  with  little  or  no  dependence 
on  the  fungal  mycelium.  In  fact,  in  situations  such  as  this  and  where 
P availability  is  not  limiting  to  growth,  a growth  depression  may  occur 
in  the  presence  of  the  mycorrhizal  fungi  as  the  host  and  the  fungus 
compete  for  plant-produced  C (Buwalda  and  Goh,  1982).  Therefore,  it 
appears  that  container  size  and  the  degree  to  which  a particular  plant 
species  can  exploit  the  available  soil  volume  are  important  factors  to 
consider  when  producing  mycorrhizal,  nodulated  seedlings  for  commercial 
purposes. 

It  is  interesting  to  note  that  after  20  weeks  growth  almost 
all  the  seedlings  were  nodulated  including  those  planted  in  the  auto- 
claved planting  medium.  The  nodulation  of  silverberry  in  the  uninocu- 
lated (autoclaved)  treatment  suggests  that  Frankia  is  readily  dispersed 
and  may  have  been  introduced  by  insects,  particularly  dipteran  larvae, 
which  were  observed  in  the  soil  during  the  dismantling  of  the 
experiment. 


84 


c 


5.3.3  Temperature 

Temperature  can  have  significant  effects  on  symbiont  develop- 
ment and  alter  plant  growth  response  to  the  symbiosis.  Maximum  mycor- 
rhizal  colonization  appears  to  occur  at  the  point  of  optimum  plant 
growth  which  for  onion,  soybean  and  cotton  falls  in  a temperature  range 
of  21  to  30®C  (Furlan  and  Fortin,  1973;  Pugh  et  al.,  1981;  Schenck  and 
Smith,  1982;  Smith  and  Roncadori , 1986).  Below  20®C,  mycorrhizal  deve- 
lopment and  plant  response  appears  to  be  suppressed.  Similarly,  infection 
and  development  by  Frankia  has  been  observed  to  be  delayed  at  tempera- 
tures below  20°C  with  nitrogen  fixation  being  totally  inhibited  at 
15®C  (Reddell  et  al.,  1985).  The  optimum  temperature  for  nodulation 
and  growth  of  Casuarina,  an  actinorhizal  plant  found  in  warm  temperate  to 
tropical  climates,  falls  in  the  range  of  25°C  to  30®C  (Reddell 
et  al.,  1985). 

These  observations  are  in  agreement  with  those  obtained  in 
this  study  where  seedlings  inoculated  with  woodland  soil  exhibited 
better  mycorrhization  and  nodulation  and  a greater  growth  response  at 
26®C  than  at  16°C.  In  the  Glomus  aggregatum  inoculated  treatment, 
however,  shoot  weights  were  greater  at  26°C  than  at  16®C  but  mycorrhi- 
zation was  not  affected  by  temperature.  This  aggressive  fungus  caused  a 
growth  depression  presumably  due  to  an  excessive  drain  of  host 
photosynthate  by  the  symbiont  (Cooper,  1984). 

5.3.4  Frankia  Inoculum  Trials 

The  preferred  method  for  inoculating  actinorhizal  shrubs  with 
Frankia  has  been  the  application  of  a liguid  suspension  of  Frankia  pure 
culture  using  either  spraying  or  injecting  technigues  (Burgess  et  al., 
1986;  Fortin  et  al.,1983;  Stowers  and  Smith,  1985;  Vogel  and  Dawson, 
1985).  Perinet  et  al.  (1985)  compared  crushed  nodule  and  pure  culture 
inoculum  on  alder  seedlings  and  found  that  the  use  of  nodule  homoge- 
nates resulted  in  variable  nodulation  which  was  not  reproducible.  This 
was  not  the  case  in  this  study  where  inoculation  of  silver-berry  with 
wild  buffalo-berry  soil,  crushed  nodules  or  polyvinyl  pyrrolidine- 
treated  nodules  resulted  in  the  biggest  seedlings  with  the  most  heavily 
nodulated  root  systems.  Seedlings  inoculated  with  Frankia  pure  culture 
obtained  from  Rhizotec  Labs  in  Quebec  became  heavily  nodulated  but  this 


85 


was  not  manifested  in  improved  plant  growth.  A slower  rate  of  nodula- 
tion  and  a delay  in  the  N2-fixation  process  in  this  treatment  may 
explain  the  lack  of  a growth  response.  It  is  possible  a positive 
growth  response  would  have  occurred  if  the  experiment  had  been 
extended.  No  nodule  formation  was  evident  on  silver-berry  inoculated 
with  a strain  of  Frankia  isolated  from  buf falo-berry . This  suggests 
that  the  inoculum  did  not  survive  the  inoculation  treatment  or  that 
buf falo-berry  Frankia  may  not  be  compatible  with  si  1 ver-berry . 
Treatment  of  nodules  with  polyvinly  pyrrolidine  to  prevent  oxidation  of 
phenols  greatly  improved  the  effectivity  of  the  Frankia  and  is  strongly 
recommended  if  inoculating  with  crushed  nodule  homogenate. 

The  most  practical  source  of  Frankia  inoculum  appears  to  be 
forest  floor  soil  removed  from  beneath  wild  buffalo-berry.  This  inocu- 
lum was  much  more  effective  if  mixed  into  the  planting  mixture  than  if 
applied  as  a slurry,  presumably  as  a result  of  better  distribution  of 
the  inoculum.  The  time  at  which  the  seedlings  were  inoculated  did  not 
appear  to  be  important  in  determining  the  rate  and  degree  of  nodulation 
suggesting  that  inoculum  can  be  introduced  either  before  or  shortly 
after  planting,  whichever  is  most  convenient.  The  lack  of  mycorrhizal 
development  in  the  slurry  treatments  is  difficult  to  explain,  but  may 
have  been  due  to  a reduction  in  mycorrhizal  infectivity  caused  by 
vigorous  stirring  (10,000  rpm)  during  slurry  preparation. 

5.3.5  Growing  Regimes  for  Greenhouse  Production  of  Mycorrhizal, 

Nodulated  Silver-berry  and  Buffalo-berry 

Based  on  the  foregoing  results  and  discussion,  growing  regimes 
for  the  greenhouse  production  of  mycorrhizal,  nodulated  silver-berry 
and  buf falo-berry  were  formulated.  These  are  presented  in  Tables  29  and 
30.  It  should  be  kept  in  mind  that  the  final  heights  and  weights  of 
the  seedlings  are  dependent  to  a large  degree  on  the  use  of  highly 
infective  and  effective  symbiont  inoculum. 

5.4  FIELD  TRIAL  TO  TEST  GROWTH  RESPONSE  OF  INOCULATED  SILVER-BERRY 

AND  BUFFALO-BERRY 

At  the  time  of  outplanting,  the  size  of  the  silver-berry 
shrubs  compared  favorably  with  those  outplanted  on  the  RRTAC  plots 


86 


c 


Table  29.  Growing  regime  for  greenhouse  production  of  mycorrhizal, 
nodulated  si  1 ver-berry . 


Planting  Time: 

March,  April 

Inoculum: 

Silver-berry  field  or  pot  culture  soil  with 
high  inoculant  load;  crushed  nodules  for 
N2-fixinq  Frankia 

Inoculum  Quantity/Container: 

10-15%  Inoculum  soil/planting  mixture  (V/V); 


inoculum  mixed  into  planting  mixture 

Planting  Mixture: 

1/1  (V/V)  Peat/Vermiculite 

Container  Volume: 

150  cc 

Grower  Fertilizer: 

200  mg  28-14-14  L~^  applied  twice  weekly  or 
56  mg  N,  28  mg  P2O5,  28  mg  K2O  L"^ 
applied  twice  weekly 

Temperature: 

25-30OC 

Growing  Time: 

12-14  weeks 

Product: 

24-26  cm  tall,  mycorrhizal,  nodulated  seedling 
with  1 - 1.2  g shoot  weight 

87 


Table  30.  Growing  regime  for  greenhouse  production  of  mycorrhizal, 
nodulated  buffalo-berry. 


Planting  Time: 

March,  April 

Inoculum: 

Buf falo-berry  field  or  pot  culture  soil  with 
high  symbiont  inoculum  levels;  crushed  nodules 
for  Frankia 

Inoculum/Container: 

10-15%  inoculum  soil/planting  mixture  (V/V); 
inoculum  mixed  into  planting  mixture 

Planting  Mixture: 

1/1  (V/V)  Peat/Vermiculite 

Container  Volume: 

150  cc 

Grower  Fertilizer: 

200-400  mg  28-14-14  or  56-112  mg  N, 
28-56  mg  P2O5,  28-56  mg  K2O  L”''  applied 
twice  weekly 

Temperature: 

25-30OC 

Growing  Time: 

16-18  weeks 

Product: 

20-22  cm  tall,  mycorrhizal,  nodulated  seedling 
with  1.2  - 2 g shoot  weight 

88 


(0o68  g plant  ^).  However,  the  buffalo-berry  seedlings  were  small  and 
underweight  (0.23  g plant  compared  with  those  outplanted  on  the 
RRTAC  plots  (0.77  g plant  ^).  The  poor  growth  exhibited  by  buffalo- 
berry,  particularly  during  the  early  phases  of  growth,  is  believed  to 
have  been  the  result  of  inadequate  N fertilization.  It  is  postulated 
that  N2-fixing  shrubs  such  buffalo-berry  may  be  heavily  dependent  on 
the  Na-fixing  Frankia,  and  therefore,  require  either  rapid  infection 
by  this  symbiont  or  high  soil  N levels  to  compensate  for  the  lack  of 
the  symbiont.  Supplementing  the  15-15-18  fertilizer  with  NH4NO3 
improved  the  growth  of  the  buf falo-berry  seedlings  tremendously. 

Both  uninoculated  and  inoculated  seedlings  were  of  a similar 
size  thereby  justifying  treatment  comparisons.  All  inoculated  seed- 
lings developed  mycorrhizae  and  nodules  but  infection  was  patchy 
possibly  due  to  variation  in  the  fertilizer  regime. 

High  mortality  during  the  first  winter  can  be  explained  by 
insufficient  hardening  off  and  freezing  weather  conditions  within  days 
after  outplanting.  Mortality  was  higher  for  the  inoculated  than  unino- 
culated seedlings,  also  presumably  due  to  improper  hardening  off.  Some 
studies  have  shown  that  mycorrhizal  infection  can  reduce  stomatal 
resistance,  thereby  increasing  transpi ration  rate  (Allen  et  al.,  1981; 
Allen  and  Boosalis,  1983;  Levy  and  Krikun,  1980)  although  recent  inves- 
tigations by  Graham  et  al.  (1987)  failed  to  find  any  effect  of  mycor- 
rhizal infection  on  the  water  relations  of  Citrus . It  is  possible, 
however,  that,  due  to  improper  hardening  off,  the  inoculated  silver- 
berry  and  buffalo-berry  were  not  in  the  same  physiological  condition  as 
their  uninoculated  counterparts  when  outplanted.  Greater  stomatal 
conductivity  and  higher  rates  of  transpiration  may  have  increased  the 
susceptibility  of  the  inoculated  seedlings  to  frost  damage.  It  may  be 
that  mycorrhizal  seedlings  require  a longer  period  of  hardening  off 
than  non-mycorrhizal  seedlings  do.  The  relationship  between  symbiont 
infection  and  susceptibility  to  winter  kill  should  be  investigated  in 
more  detail . 

The  much  superior  growth  performance  of  inoculated  seedlings 
compared  with  uninoculated  seedlings  over  two  growing  seasons  provides 
unequivocal  proof  that  pre-inoculation  with  mycorrhizal  and  N2-fixing 
symbionts  can,  in  the  case  of  buffalo-berry  and  si  1 ver-berry , result  in 
more  rapid  revegetion  of  oil  sands  tailings.  These  findings  support 


89 


those  of  Burgess  et  al.  (1986)  where  Frankia-inoculated  alders  signifi- 
cantly outperformed  uninoculated  alders  over  a three  year  period. 

It  is  unknown  why  both  inoculated  and  uninoculated  buffalo- 
berry  were  more  productive  in  the  peat  and  clay-amended  tailings  sand 
than  in  the  tailings  sand  amended  with  peat  only.  Differences  in  site 
characteristics  and  soil  chemical/physical  properties  are  possible 
explanations . 

It  is  difficult  to  determine  if  the  symbionts  introduced  with 
the  seedlings  persisted  and  continued  to  colonize  after  outplanting; 
however,  the  much  greater  nodule  production  and  mycorrhizal  development 
in  the  inoculated  treatments  suggests  that  this  was  the  case.  The 
indigenous  soil  inoculum  successfully  infected  the  uninoculated  seed- 
lings, but  it  is  postulated  that  symbiont  inoculum  potential  and  rates 
of  colonization  were  so  low  that  infection  could  not  approach  that  in 
the  pre-inoculated  seedlings  over  the  two  year  period. 

The  relative  contributions  of  the  mycorrhizal  fungi  and  the 
Frankia  to  plant  growth  could  not  be  discerned  in  this  study.  However, 
nodule  number/weights  exhibited  a much  stronger  correlation  with  shoot 
weights  than  mycorrhizal  root  lengths  inferring  that,  under  the 
conditions  of  this  study,  shoot  production  was  more  dependent  on  nodule 
status  than  mycorrhizal  condition.  The  very  close  relationship  between 
shoot  weights  and  nodule  weights  is  emphasized  in  the  regressions 
presented  in  Figures  7 and  8. 

Vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizae  can  enhance  nodulation  and 
N2-fixation  by  satisfying  the  high  P demand  required  for  these 
processes  (Barea  and  Azcon-Agui lar,  1983).  Consequently,  their  contri- 
bution may  be  a subtle  one  and  should  not  be  underestimated.  However, 
the  relatively  poor  correlation  between  nodule  status  and  mycorrhizal 
development  in  both  silver-berry  and  buffalo-berry  indicates  that, 
under  field  conditions,  other  factors  besides  mycorrhizal  status  may 
strongly  influence  nodulation.  Whatever  the  mechanisms  behind  the 
superior  growth  performance  of  the  inoculated  shrubs,  this  study  has 
demonstrated  that  actinorhizal  seedlings  can  benefit  greatly  over  the 
long  term  from  artificial  introduction  of  their  symbionts  prior  to  out- 
planting.  Therefore,  when  using  actinorhizal  shrubs  for  reclamation, 
and  possibly  for  amenity  and  forestry  purposes  also,  symbiont  inocula- 
tion of  seedlings  is  strongly  recommended. 


90 


c 


6.  REFERENCES  CITED 

Abbott,  L.K.  and  A.D.  Robson,  1984.  The  effect  of  mycorrhizae  on 

plant  growth.  Ijn:  VA  Mycorrhizae.  Edited  by  C.  LI.  Powell 

and  D.J.  Bagyaraj . CRC  Press,  Boca  Raton,  FL.  pp.  113-130. 

Aldon,  E.F.  1978.  Endomycorrhi zae  enhance  shrub  growth  and  survival 
on  minespoils.  In:  Reclamation  of  Disturbed  Arid  Lands. 

Edited  by  R.A.  Wright.  University  of  Mexico  Press, 
Albuquerque,  pp.  174-179. 

Allen,  E.B.  and  M.F.  Allen.  1980.  Natural  re-establishment  of 

vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizae  following  stripmine 
reclamation  in  Wyoming.  Journal  of  Applied  Ecology  17:  139- 
147. 

Allen,  M.F.  and  M.C.  Boosalis.  1983.  Effects  of  two  species  of  VA 
mycorrhizal  fungi  on  drought  tolerance  of  wheat.  New 
Phytologist  93:  61-76. 

Allen,  M.F.,  W.K.  Smith,  T.S.  Moore  and  M.  Christensen.  1981. 

Comparative  water  relations  and  photosynthesis  of  mycorrhizal 
and  non-mycorrhizal  Bouteloua  gracilis  (H.B.K.)  Lag  ex  Steud. 
New  Phytologist  88:  683-693. 

Ames,  R.N.  and  G.J.  Bethlenfal vay.  1987.  Localized  increase  in  nodule 
activity  but  no  competitive  interaction  of  cowpea  rhizobia  due 
to  pre-establishment  of  vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhiza.  New 
Phytologist  106:  207-215. 

Azcon-Agui lar,  C.  and  J.M.  Barea.  1981.  Field  inoculation  of  Medicago 
with  V-A  mycorrhizae  and  Rhizobium  in  phosphate-fixing 
agricultural  soil.  Soil  Biology  and  Biochemistry  13:  19-22. 

Baath,  E.  and  D.S.  Hayman.  1984.  Effect  of  soil  volume  and  plant 

density  on  mycorrhizal  infection  and  growth  response.  Plant 
and  Soil  77:  373-376. 

Barea,  J.M.  and  C.  Azcon-Agui lar.  1983.  Mycorrhizas  and  their 

significance  in  nodulating  nitrogen-fixing  plants.  Advances 
in  Agronomy  3:  1-54. 


91 


Barea,  J.M,,  J.L.  Escudero  and  C.  Azcon-G-de  Aguilar.  1980.  Effects  of 
introduced  and  indigenous  VA  mycorrhizal  fungi  on  nodulation, 
growth,  and  nutrition  of  Medicago  sati va  in  phosphate  fixing 
soils  as  affected  by  P fertilizers.  Plant  and  Soil  54: 
283-296. 

Bond,  G.,  W.W.  Fletcher  and  T.P.  Ferguson.  1954.  The  development  and 
function  of  the  root  nodules  of  Alnus , Myrica  and  Hippophae. 
Plant  and  Soil  5:  309-323. 

Burgess,  D.,  L.  Chatarpaul  and  0.  Hendrickson.  1986.  Field 

performance  of  Frankia-inoculated  and  non-inoculated  Alders 
(Alnus  spp.):  Preliminary  results.  Information  Report  Pl-X- 

67.  Petawawa  National  Forestry  Institute.  14  pp. 

Buwalda,  J.G.  and  K.M.  Goh.  1982.  Host-fungus  competition  for  carbon 
as  a cause  of  growth  depressions  in  vesicular-arbuscular 
mycorrhizal  ryegrass.  Soil  Biology  and  Biochemistry  14: 
103-106. 

Carling,  D.E. , W.G,  Riehle,  M.F.  Brown  and  D.J.  Johnson.  1978.  Effects 
of  a vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  fungus  on  nitrate 
reductase  and  nitrogenase  activities  in  nodulating  and 
non-nodulating  soybeans.  Phytopathology  68:  1590-1596. 

Carpenter,  C.V.  and  L.R.  Robertson.  1983.  Isolation  and  culture  of 

nitrogen-fixing  organisms.  In:  Biological  Nitrogen  Fixation 

in  Forest  Ecosystems:  Foundations  and  Applications.  Edited 

by  J.C.  Gordon  and  C.T.  Wheeler.  Martinus  Nijhoff,  The  Hague. 

Cooper,  K.M.  1984.  Physiology  of  VAM  mycorrhizal  associations.  Ln: 

VA  Mycorrhiza.  Edited  by  C.  LI.  Powell  and  D.J.  Bagyaraj. 
CRC  Press,  Boca  Raton,  FL.  pp.  155-186. 

Cote,  B.  and  C.  Camire.  1985.  Nitrogen  cycling  in  dense  plantings  of 
hybrid  poplar  and  black  alder.  Plant  and  Soil  87:  195-208. 

Danielson,  R.M.,  C.L.  Griffiths  and  D.  Parkinson.  1984.  Effects  of 

fertilization  on  the  growth  and  mycorrhizal  development  of 
container-grown  jack  pine  seedlings.  Forest  Science  30: 
828-835. 

Danielson,  R.M.,  J.C.  Zak  and  D.  Parkinson.  1984.  Mycorrhizal  inoculum 
in  a peat  deposit  formed  under  a white  spruce  stand  in 
Alberta.  Canadian  Journal  of  Botany  63:  2557-2560. 


92 


< 

DeBell,  D.S.  and  M.A.  Radwan.  1979.  Growth  and  nitrogen  relations  of 
coppiced  black  cottonwood  and  red  alder  in  pure  and  mixed 
plantings.  Botanical  Gazette  (Chicago)  140:  S97-S101. 

Fessenden,  R.J.  1979.  Use  of  actinorhizal  plants  for  land  reclamation 
and  amenity  planting  in  the  U.S.A.  and  Canada.  Syncrude 
Professional  Paper.  1979-9. 

Fortin,  J.A.,  L.  Chatarpaul  and  A.  Carlisle.  1983.  The  role  of 

nitrogen  fixation  in  intensive  forestry  in  Canada,  Part  II. 
Research  carried  out  at  Laval  University,  Quebec,  on 
nitrogen-fixing  actinorhizal  trees  and  shrubs.  Information 
Report  Pl-X-29.  Petawawa  National  Forestry  Institute.  112  pp. 

Fortin,  J.  A.,  L.  Chatarpaul  and  A.  Carlisle.  1984.  The  role  of 

nitrogen  fixation  in  intensive  forestry  in  Canada,  Part  1. 
Principles,  practice  and  potential.  Information  Report  P1-X- 
28.  Petawawa  National  Forestry  Institute.  91  pp. 

Furlan,  V.  and  J.A.  Fortin.  1973.  Formation  of  endomycorrhi zae  by 
Endoqone  calospora  on  Allium  cepa  under  three  temperature 
regimes.  Naturaliste  Canadien  100:  467-  477. 

Furlan,  V.,  J.A.  Fortin  and  C.  Plenchette.  1983.  Effects  of  different 
vesicular-arbuscular  fungi  on  growth  of  Fraxinus  americana. 
Canadian  Journal  of  Forest  Research  13:  589-593. 

Ganry,  F.,  H.G.  Diem  and  Y.R.  Dommergues.  1982.  Effect  of  inoculation 
with  Glomus  mosseae  on  nitrogen  fixation  by  field  grown 
soybeans.  Plant  and  Soil  68:  321-329. 

Gould,  A. 8.  and  A.E.  Liberta.  1981.  Effects  of  topsoil  storage  during 
surface  mining  on  the  viability  of  vesicular-arbuscular 
mycorrhizae.  Mycologia  73:  914-922. 

Graham,  J.H.,  J.P.  Syvertsen  and  M.L.  Smith,  Jr.  1987.  Water  relations 
of  mycorrhizal  and  phosphorus-fertilized  non-mycorrhi zal 
Citrus  under  drought  stress.  New  Phytologist  105:  411-419. 

Green,  N.E.,  M.D.  Smith,  W.D.  Beavis  and  E.F.  Aldon.  1983.  Influence 
of  vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  fungi  on  the  nodulation 
and  growth  of  subclover.  Journal  of  Range  Management  36: 
576-578. 


93 


Hansen,  E.A.  and  J,0.  Dawson.  1982.  Effect  of  Alnus  glutinosa  on 

hybrid  Populus  height  growth  in  a short-rotation  intensively 
cultured  plantation.  Forest  Science  28:  49-59. 

Hardy  Associates.  1983.  RRTAC  oils  sands  tailings  soils 

reconstruction,  interim  report.  Unpublished  report  prepared 
for  Oil  Sands  Reclamation  Research  Program  Steering  Committee, 
Alberta  Environment.  25  pp. 

Hardy  Associates.  1984.  RRTAC  oil  sand  tailings  reconstruction  annual 
report  1983-84.  Unpublished  report  prepared  for  Oil  Sands 
Reclamation  Research  Program  Steering  Committee,  Alberta 
Environment.  30  pp. 

Hayman,  D.S.  1982.  Influence  of  soils  and  fertility  on  activity  and 
survival  of  vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  fungi. 
Phytopathology  72:  1119-1125. 

Heilman,  D.  and  G.  Ekuan.  1982.  Modulation  and  nitrogen  fixation  by 
red  alder  and  Sitka  alder  on  coal  mine  spoils.  Canadian 
Journal  of  Forest  Research  12:  992-997. 

Huss-Danell,  K.  1986.  Growth  and  production  of  leaf  litter  nitrogen 
by  Alnus  incana  in  response  to  liming  and  fertilization  on 
degenerated  forest  soil.  Canadian  Journal  of  Forest  Research 
16:  847-853. 

Khan,  A.G.  1981.  Growth  responses  of  endomycorrhi zal  onions  in 
unsterilized  coal  wastes.  New  Phytologist  87:  363-370. 

King,  P.  1980.  Review  of  seed  pretreatments  required  for  germination 
of  candidate  native  tree  and  shrub  species  in  the  eastern 
slopes  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  and  foothills  of  Alberta. 
Alberta  Energy  and  Natural  Resources  Report  154. 

King,  P.,  G.  Grainger  and  A.  Strata.  1983.  Testing  of  seed 

pregermination  treatments  for  selected  native  shrub  species. 
Preliminary  phase.  Alberta  Energy  and  Natural  Resources 
Report  T/43. 

Kormanik,  P.P.,  R.C.  Schultz  and  W.C.  Bryan.  1982.  The  influence  of 

vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizae  on  the  growth  and  development 
of  eight  hardwood  species.  Forest  Science  28:  531-539. 


94 


Kovacic,  D.A.,  T.V.  St.  John  and  M.I.  Dyer.  1984.  Lack  of 

vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  inoculum  in  a Ponderosa  pine 
forest.  Ecology  65:  1755-1759. 

Lambert,  D.H.  and  H.  Cole,  Jr.  1980.  Effects  of  mycorrhizae  on 

establishment  and  performance  of  forage  species  in  mine 
spoil.  Agronomy  Journal  72:  257-260. 

Levy,  Y.  and  J.  Krikun.  1980.  Effect  of  vesicular-arbuscular 

mycorrhiza  on  Citrus  .iambhiri  water  relations.  New  Phytologist 
85:  25-31. 

Lindsey,  D.L.,  W.A.  Cress  and  E.F.  Aldon.  1977.  The  effects  of 

endomycorrhizae  on  growth  of  rabbitbrush,  fourwing  saltbush, 
and  corn  in  coal  mine  spoil  material.  USDA  Forest  Service 
Research  Note  RM-1693.  6 pp. 

Loomis,  W.O.  and  J.  Battaille.  1966.  Plant  phenolic  compounds  and  the 
isolation  of  plant  enzymes.  Phytochemistry:  5:  423-438. 

MacConnell,  J.T.  and  6.  Bond.  1957.  A comparison  of  the  effect  of 

combined  nitrogen  on  nodulation  in  non-legumes  and  legumes. 
Plant  and  Soil  8:  378-388. 

Malcolm,  D.C.,  J.E.  Hooker  and  C.T.  Wheeler.  1985.  Frankia  symbiosis 
as  a source  of  nitrogen  in  forestry:  a case  study  of  symbiotic 
nitrogen-fixation  in  a mixed  Alnus-Picea  plantation  in 
Scotland.  Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Edinburgh  858: 
263-282. 

Menge,  J.A.  1984.  Inoculum  production.  In:  VA  Mycorrhizae.  Edited 

by  C.Ll.  Powell  and  D.J.  Bagyaraj.  CRC  Press,  Boca  Raton, 
FL.  pp.  187-203. 

Menge,  J.A.,  W.M.  Jarrell,  C.K.  Labanauskas,  J.C.  Ojala,  C.  Hussar, 

E.L.V.  Johnson  and  D.  Sibert.  1982.  Predicting  mycorrhizal 
dependency  of  troyer  citrange  on  Glomus  fasciculatus  in 
California  citrus  soils  and  nursery  mixes.  Soil  Science 
Society  of  America  Journal  46:  762-768. 

Miller,  R.M.,  B.A.  Carnes  and  T.B.  Moorman.  1984.  Factors  influencing 
survival  of  vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhiza  propagules  during 
topsoil  storage.  Journal  of  Applied  Ecology  22:  259-266, 


95 


Moorman,  T.  and  F.B.  Reeves.  1979.  The  role  of  endomycorrhi zae  in 

revegetation  practices  in  the  semi-arid  west.  II.  A bioassay 
to  determine  the  effect  of  land  disturbance  on  endomycorrhi zal 
populations.  American  Journal  of  Botany  66:  14-18. 

Mott,  J.B.  and  D.A.  Zuberer.  1987.  Occurrence  of  vesicular- 

arbuscular  mycorrhizae  in  mixed  overburden  mine  spoils  in 
Texas.  Reclamation  and  Revegetation  Research  6:  145-156. 

Normand,  P.,  M.  Lalonde,  J.A.  Fortin  and  L.  Chatarpaul.  1984.  The 
isolation,  characteri zation  and  evaluation  of  Frankia 
strains.  Information  Report  Pl-X-30.  Petawawa  National 
Forestry  Institute.  50pp. 

Perinet,  P.,  J.6.  Brouillette,  J.A.  Fortin  and  M.  Lalonde.  1985.  Large 
scale  inoculation  of  actinorhizal  plants  with  Frankia.  Plant 
and  Soil  87:  175-183. 

Phillips,  J.M.  and  D.S.  Hayman.  1970.  Improved  procedures  for 

clearing  roots  and  staining  parasitic  and  vesicular- 
arbuscular  mycorrhizal  fungi  for  rapid  assessment  of 
infection.  Transactions  of  the  British  Mycological  Society 
55:  158-161. 

Plenchette,  C.,  V.  Furlan  and  J.A.  Fortin.  1981.  Growth  stimulation 
of  apple  trees  in  unsterilized  soil  under  field  conditions 
with  VA  mycorrhiza  inoculation.  Canadian  Journal  of  Botany 
59:  2003-2008. 

Pope,  P.E.,  W.R.  Chaney,  J.D.  Rhodes  and  S.H.  Woodhead.  1983.  The 
mycorrhizal  dependency  of  four  hardwood  tree  species. 
Canadian  Journal  of  Botany  61:  412-417. 

Powell,  C.L1.  1984.  Field  inoculation  with  VA  mycorrhizal  fungi. 

In:  VA  Mycorrhizae.  Edited  by  C.Ll.  Powell  and  D.J 

Bagyaraj.  CRC  Press,  Boca  Raton,  FL.  pp.  205-222. 

Pugh,  L.M.,  R.W.  Roncadori  and  R.S.  Hussey.  1981.  Factors  affecting 
vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  development  and  growth  on 
cotton.  Mycologia  73:  869-879. 

Quispel,  A.  1960.  Symbiotic  nitrogen  fixation  in  non-  leguminous 

plants.  V.  The  growth  requirements  of  the  endophyte  of  Alnus 
qlutinosa.  Acta  Botanica  Neerlandica  9:  380-396. 


96 


c 

Redden,  P.,  G.D.  Bowen  and  A.D.  Robson.  1985.  The  effects  of  soil 

temperature  on  plant  growth,  nodulation  and  nitrogen  fixation 
in  Casuarina  cunninghamiana  Miq.  New  Phytologist  101:  441-450. 

Redente,  E.F.  and  F.B.  Reeves.  1981.  Interactions  between 

vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhiza  and  Rhizobium  and  their  effect 
on  sweetvetch  growth.  Soil  Science  129:  253-257. 

Rives,  C.S.,  M.I.  Bajwa,  A.E.  Liberta  and  R.M.  Miller.  1980.  Effects 
of  topsoil  storage  during  surface  mining  on  the  viability  of 
V-A  mycorrhiza.  Soil  Science  129:  253-257. 

Rose,  S.L.  1980.  Mycorrhizal  associations  of  some  actinomycete 

nodulated  nitrogen-fixing  plants.  Canadian  Journal  of  Botany 
58:  1449-1454. 

Rose,  S.L.  and  C.T.  Youngberg.  1981.  Tripartite  associations  in 

snowbush  (Ceanothus  velutinus) : effect  of  vesicular- 

arbuscular  mycorrhizae  on  growth,  nodulation,  and  nitrogen 
fixation.  Canadian  Journal  of  Botany  59:  34-39. 

Rowe,  J.S.  1972.  Forest  regions  of  Canada.  Canadian  Forestry 
Service,  Publication  No.  1300.  172  pp. 

Schenck,  N.C.  and  G.S.  Smith.  1982.  Responses  of  six  species  of 

vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  fungi  and  their  effects  on 
soybean  at  four  soil  temperatures.  New  Phytologist  92: 
193-201 . 

Smith,  G.S.  and  R.W.  Roncadori . 1986.  Responses  of  three 

vesicular-arbuscular  mycorrhizal  fungi  at  four  soil 
temperatures  and  their  effects  on  cotton  growth.  New 
Phytologist  104:  89-95. 

Smith,  S.E.  and  M.J.  Daft.  1977.  Interactions  between  growth, 

phosphate  content  and  nitrogen  fixation  in  mycorrhizal  and 
non-mycorrhizal  Medicago  sati va . Australian  Journal  of  Plant 
Physiology  4:  403-414. 

Smith,  S.E.,  D.J.D.  Nicholas  and  F.A.  Smith.  1979.  Effect  of  early 

mycorrhizal  fixation  in  Trifolium  subterraneum  L.  Australian 
Journal  of  Plant  Physiology  6:  305-316. 

Stowers,  M.D.  and  J.E.  Smith.  1985.  Inoculation  and  production  of 
container-grown  red  alder  seedlings.  Plant  and  Soil  87: 
153-160. 


97 


Strong,  W.L.  and  K.R.  Leggat.  1981.  Ecoregions  of  Alberta.  Alberta 
Energy  and  Natural  Resources.  ENR  Technical  Report  Number 
T/4.  64  pp. 

Tarrant,  R.F.  and  J.M.  Trappe.  1971.  The  role  of  Alnus  in  improving 
the  forest  environment.  Plant  and  Soil,  Special  Volume,  pp. 
335-348. 

Torrey,  J.6.  1978.  Nitrogen  fixation  by  actinomycete-nodulated 

angiosperms.  BioScience  28:  586-591. 

Trappe,  J.M.  1981.  Mycorrhizae  and  productivity  of  arid  and  semiarid 
rangelands.  In:  Advances  in  Food  Producing  Systems  for  Arid 

and  Semiarid  Lands.  Academic  Press,  New  York.  pp.  581-599. 

Turchenek,  L.W.  and  J.D.  Lindsay.  1982.  Soils  inventory  of  the 

Alberta  oil  sands  environmental  research  program  study  area. 
Prep,  for  the  Alberta  Oil  Sands  Environmental  Research  Program 
by  Alberta  Research  Council,  Soils  Department.  AOSERP  Report 

122.  221  pp. 

Visser,  S.,  C.L.  Griffiths  and  D.  Parkinson.  1984.  Topsoil  storage 
effects  on  primary  production  and  rates  of  vesicular- 
arbuscular  mycorrhizal  development  in  Agropvron  trachycaulum. 
Plant  and  Soil  82:  51-60. 

Vogel,  C.S.  and  J.O.  Dawson.  1985.  Effect  of  juglone  on  growth  in 

vitro  of  Frankia  isolates  and  nodulation  of  Alnus  glutinosa  in 
soil.  Plant  and  Soil  87:  79-89. 

Warner,  A.  1983.  Re-establishment  of  indigenous  vesicular-arbuscular 
mycorrhizal  fungi  after  topsoil  storage.  Plant  and  Soil  73: 
387-394. 

Wheeler,  C.T.,  J.E.  Hooker,  A.  Crowe  and  A.M.M.  Berrie.  1986.  The 

improvement  and  utilization  in  forestry  of  nitrogen  fixation 
by  actinorhizal  plants  with  special  reference  to  Alnus  in 
Scotland.  Plant  and  Soil  90:  393-406. 

Zak,  J.C.  and  D.  Parkinson.  1982.  Initial  vesicular-arbuscular 

mycorrhizal  development  of  slender  wheatgrass  on  two  amended 
mine  spoils.  Canadian  Journal  of  Botany  60:  2241-2248. 

Zak,  J.C.  and  D.  Parkinson.  1983.  Effects  of  surface  amendation  of 
two  minespoils  in  Alberta,  Canada,  on  vesicular-arbuscular 
mycorrhizal  development  of  slender  wheatgrass:  a 4-year 

study.  Canadian  Journal  of  Botany  61:  798-803. 


98 


Appendix  Table  1.  Mycorrhizal  infection  of  slender  wheatgrass  grown  in 
undisturbed  muskeg  and  stockpiled  peat  (peat  stockpiled  for  8 
months) . ^ 


Sampling  Depth  (cm) 

Root  Parameter 

Peat  Source 

0-15 

50-100 

Total  root  length 

Undisturbed 

545.0® 

578.6® 

H 

_J 

E 

Stockpile 

563.5® 

623.1® 

Mycorrhizal  root  length 

Undisturbed 

61  .5 

21  .9 

(m  L”") 

Stockpile 

0 

23.8 

with  arbuscules 

Undisturbed 

19.7  ± 35.5 

5.3  t 

7.0 

Stockpile 

0 

3.4  + 

5.1 

with  vesicles 

Undisturbed 

4.4  + 8.3 

2.3  t 

5.1 

Stockpile 

0 

2.1  + 

3.0 

with  hyphae 

Undisturbed 

37.4  ± 55.3 

14.3  ± 

22.8 

Stockpile 

0 

18.3  ± 

26.8 

Percent  infection 

Undisturbed 

14.5® 

4.8® 

Stockpile 

0® 

3.1® 

1 Where  possible,  data  were  analyzed  by  two-way  ANOVA  (MSE  = 322.82 
and  117.05  for  total  root  length  and  percent  infection  respectively). 
Values  in  each  data  set  followed  by  the  same  letter  do  not  differ 
significantly  (p  = 0.5).  Standard  deviations  are  included  for  those 
data  which  could  not  be  analyzed.