Skip to main content

Full text of "Robert Vose and his times"

See other formats


°o 


"-^^^^'%°'        ^^,'^^\/       -o^^^.'/        V' 


^"-■t. 


\^^^  ,^^^^  ^/^  "^^fe'^  ""^^^^^  *>Va:^_  -"^ 


-0 


"bv' 


Robert  Vose 


AND  HIS 


Times 


Compiled  by 
ELLEN  F.  VOSE  and 
MARY  H.  HINCKLEY 


L     Robert  Vose  in  England. 

IL     His  Arrival  in  New  England 
and  Settlement  in  Milton. 

in.     Milton  in  1662. 

IV.     Second   Meeting   House   and 
Vose's  Lane. 

V.     Customs  in    Robert    Vose's 
Time—Close  of  Life. 


Reprinted    from    The    Milton    Record,  Nov.— Dec,  1910. 


F7f- 


\i.  "Jr.  "\S0j3A. 


K3  -    '.SI 


ROBERT  VOSE   IN   ENGLAND 


Robert  Vosc  was  born  in  Lancas- 
hire, England,  about  1599.  He  was  a 
resident  there  in  1650,  though  the 
statement  has  many  times  appeared 
that  he  came  to  America  in  1635  with 
Richard  Mather.  The  first  appearance 
of  iiis  iiame  m  New  Eiu^land  was  in 
1654,  when  lie  purchased  from  the 
heirs  of  "me  worshipful  Mr.  John 
Qlover"  of  JBoston,  "for  the  sum  of 
thiee  hundred  and  fowre  score  pounds 
sterl,"  over  500  acres  of  land  in  that 
part  of  Dorche&toj-  called  Unquatiquis- 
set  or  Unouity,  which,  In  1G62,  was 
incorporated  in  the  town  of  Milton. 
The  obligation  v/as  dated  13  July, 
1654.  He  was  at  float  time  a  "gentle- 
man of  Dorchefcier,"  so  had  been  in 
New  England  long  enough  to  estab- 
lish a  residence,  but  the  exact  time 
of  his  arrival   i.s  unknown. 

He  was  the  youngest  son  of  Thom- 
as Vose  of  Lancashire;  apparently 
a  man  of  c'l)ility  and  influeace,  and 
belonged  to  the  period  which  wit- 
nessed the  siruggles  of  the  Reforma- 
tion. 

The  Puritan'sin  of  Lancashire  was 
confined  largely  to  the  southern  part. 
A  group  of  L'uiii.ans  had  sprung  up 
in  and  about  To\teiU  Park  near  Liv- 
erpool, and  Richard  Mather,  when 
only  a  boy,  taught  ihc-ir  children.  Ma- 
ther was  won  over  to  Puritanism  and 
in  preparation  for  the  ministry  en- 
tered Erasonose  college,  Oxford,  but 
before  he  completed  his  course  his 
friends  induced  him  to  become  their 
minister  at  Toxteth  chapel.  As  this 
ancient  chapel  was  considered  in  sorae 
respects  private  property  and  was  not 
only  retdi'u^d  by  nonconforming  min- 
isters after  the  passing  of  the  Act  of 
Uniformity,  [hji  was  licensed  under 
the  Act  of  Toleration  ac  a  preaching 
place  for  dissenteis,  Richard  Mather, 
at  first,  was  not  much  troubled  for  his 
nO'niconformity.    But    he    was   not    the 


sort  of  man  to  confine  bis  ministry  to 
a  village  congregation  and  was  a  fre- 
quent preacher  in  many  of  the  neigh- 
boring churches  and  cliajjels:  fcr 
this  he  was  finally  so  "scolded," 
and  thre.^tencd  with  fine  and  impris- 
onment if  he  did  not  desist,  that  in 
1035  he  sailed  for  New  Eigland  and 
settled  in  Do;  Chester.  A.s  schoolmas- 
icr  and  minister'  in  IL'iiyland,  Richard 
Mather  officiated  in  the  parishes  of 
which  the  Voses  were  residents,  and 
is  found  a  witness  to  the  will  of  Ed- 
ward Vose,  an  uncle  of  Robert  Vose. 

Thomas  Vose,  Robert's  father,  ap- 
pears as  a  donor  for  the  mainteTancc 
of  a  'ireacJ'ing  minister  in  two  l>an- 
cashiro  i^arishes  and  for  a  free  school 
at  Much  Woolton.  The  duty  of  a 
preacning  nnnisier  was  not  only  to 
solemnize  th(}  parochial  services  but 
lo  itinerate  in  the  neighborhood  and 
preach  in  its  several  churches  and 
chapels,  the  doctrines  of  the  Reforma- 
tion. 

"It  was  not  until  after  the  outbreak 
of  the  great  Civil  war  in  the  summer 
of  1042,  and  until  the  consequent 
plundering  and  raiding  by  the  armies 
on  either  side  that  the  attention  of 
the  House  of  Commons  was  called  to 
the  cfises  of  Puritan  ministers  dis- 
turbed or  ejected  by  the  Royalist 
army  in  various  parts  of  the  country." 
"The  first  mention  of  the  subject  of 
relief  'of  the  ministers  that  are  plun- 
dered' is  contained  in  an  order  of  the 
Commons  of  27  Dec.  1642,  appointing 
a  collection  on  their  behalf  in  all  the 
parishes  in  and  about  Londoi.  l<"'our 
days  later  a  committee  was  appoint- 
ed to  consider  of  the  fittest  way  for 
llic  relief  of  such  good  and  well  af- 
fected ministers  as  have  bee  i  plun- 
dered, and  likewise  to  consider  wnat 
malignant  persons  have  benefices  here 
in  and  about  this  town,  whose  livings 
being  sequestered,  these  may  supply 
the  cure  and  receive  tJie  profits," 


ROBERT    VOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


"The  explanation  of  the  hitherto 
most  unexplained  problem  of  Common- 
wealth church  history  lies  in  the 
growth  of  the  powers  of  the  body  thus 
created  coming  to  be  as  it  did,  with 
its  legitimate  successors,  the  trustees 
for  the  maintenance  of  ministers,  a 
board  of  Ecclesiastical  Commission- 
ers for  a  completely  disestablished 
and  a  partially  disendowed  English 
Church." 

By  virtue  of  an  act  of  Parliament 
l)assed  on  the  8th  of  June  1649,  en- 
;itled,  "An  Act  for  the  providing 
maintenance  of  preaching  ministers 
and  other  pious  uses,"  commissioners 
were  appointed  in  each  county  to  re- 
port upon  the  state  of  each  parish, 
and  to  forward  their  reports  to  Lon- 
don. 

"The  Lancashire  Commissio  i  is 
dated  March  29,  1650,  and  the  first 
meeting  was  held  in  Manchester  on 
June  19,  following.  The  Inquisition  or 
inquiry  was  taken  before  a  local  jury 
of  men  of  good  standing  and  position 
whose  names  are  given,  and  before 
whom  witnesses  were  brought  and  ex- 
amined." On  the  list  of  jurors  with 
twenty  others  are  the  names  of  John 
and  Robert  Vose,  gentlemen;  they 
were  the  sons  of  Thomas  Vose.  "By 
the  service  of  this  commission  the 
condition  of  the  more  indigent  and 
deserving  clergy  was  considerably 
improved  and  would  have  been  much 
more  improved  if  all  their  recom- 
mendations had  beei  observed." 

"The  survey  showed  that  there  were 
in  Lancashire  in  1650,  64  parish 
churches  and  118  chapels,  of  which  no 
less  than  38  were  without  ministers, 
chiefly  for  want  of  maintenance."  The 
following  is  an  abstract  from  the  re- 
port concerning  Farnworth,  a  village 
in  the  township  of  Widnes,  an  an- 
cient chapelry  with  a  chapel  dedicat- 
ed to  St.  Wilfred.  Withm  a  lew  years 
the  church  which  is  supposed  to  be 
of  the  age  of  Henry  VIII,  has  been 
restored.  The  register  begins  in  1538. 

"For  the  p'sent  there  is  none  that 
supplyeth  the  Cure  there.  In  respect 
there  is  but  three  pounds  six  shill- 
ings eight  pence  per  annum  w'ch  is 
allowed  by  Pattent  out  of  the  Reven- 
ues  of   the    Dutchy    of   Lancaster    for 


the  preaching  Mlnist'r  there;  and  one 
Donative  of  Tenn  pounds  given  by 
Thomas  Vause  (Vose)  deceased,  the 
interest  of  which  goes  to  the  use  of 
the  manteynance  of  a  p'eaching  Min- 
ister att  Farneworth." 

The  Report  in  regard  to  the  chapel 
in  the  township  of  Hale  is,  that  it  is 
fit  to  be  made  a  parish  church  and 
Haiebancke  and  part  of  Halewood  in- 
cluded in  the  parish.  "That  the  tyth 
of  thai  pt  ct  Halewood  amounteth  to 
nyneteen  pounds  p  ann,  and  the  small 
tythes  belong  to  the  Viccarr  worth 
20s  p  ann;  and  wee  find  that  there  is 
no  Parsonage  or  Viccarage  p'seitative 
w'th'n  the  Towneshipp  of  Hale  af- 
foresaid,  and  that  there  is  a  whyte 
rent  of  three  shillings  five  pence  in 
Hale  afforesaid;  and  that  there  is  a 
donative  of  fhve  pounds  given  to  the 
Chappelrie  for  the  manteynance  of  a 
Minist'r  by  Thomas  Vause  (Vose)  late 
deceased;  and  remains  in  the  hands 
of  Thomas  Linley  for  the  use  of  the 
Minist'r  afforesaid  when  there  is  any 
that  supplyes  the  Cure  there,  which 
is   for    (the)    p'sent   vacant." 

The  small  amount  of  money  in  cir- 
culation in  those  days  is  showi  by 
the  pay  to  borough  members  which 
was  usually  'two  shillings  a  day  be- 
fides  the  expense  of  travelling  to  and 
from  Westminster.  The  knights  ol 
I  he  shire  were  allowed  4  shillings  and 
afterv/Trds  6  shillings  a  day,  which 
great  expense  on  one  occasion  i  i- 
duced  the  careful  freeholders  of  Lan- 
cashire to  unite  with  their  neighbors 
of  Cumberland  in  sending  one  mem- 
ber between  them,  each  county  paying 
half  his  wages." 

The  school  in  Much  Woolton  which 
received  a  donation  by  the  will  of 
Thomas  Vose  was  founded  iu  1641. 
Previous  to  the  Reformation  only 
three  grammar  schools  existed  in  the 
county,  and  tiiey  had  recently  been 
founded.  One  of  these  three  schools 
was  in  Farnworth  which  became  "a 
sort  of  nursery  for  Lancashire  Puri- 
tans." Richard  Mather  was  school- 
master there  at  one  time.  "Before  this 
the  only  education  to  be  obtained  by 
the  poor  was  in  the  monasteries  and 
the  tew  boys  educated  there  were  us- 
ually  trained  for  the  priesthood."     It 


ROBERT    VOSE    IN    ENGLAND 


would  seem  that  writing  by  no  means 
kept  pace  with  reading  and  learning. 
Even  in  the  towns  few  of  the  trades- 
men could  write.  We  get  an  inciden- 
tal glimpse  of  the  education  of  the 
clergy  of  this  period  in  the  provision 
made  for  tlie  teaching  of  writing  and 
singing  in  the  Free  Grammar  School 
at  Rivington.  A  stipend  is  alloted  to 
the  curate  of  the  church  if  he  teach, 
but  if  he  will  not  or  cannot  teach  to 
sing  and  write  another  teacher  is  to 
be  provided.  The  statutes  imply  that 
the  purpose  of  the  school  (Rivington) 
is  to  prepare  its  pupils  for  the  church, 
and  the  still  unsettled  state  of  doc- 
trine is  shown  by  "the  eldest  sort  who 
are  ready  to  become  ministers  must 
be  perfected  in  Calvin's  Catechism  and 
Institutions," 

Rev.  E.  E.  Hale  says,  "the  words 
Grammar  School  and  Free  School, 
carry  with  them  in  England  different 
signification  than  those  to  which  we 
are  accustomed  in  America.  In  Eng- 
land a  large  number,  if  not  all  of  the 
endowed  schools  are  called  'gram- 
mar schools'  because  tlieir  founders 
wished  to  have  boys  taught  to  read 
Latin  and  Greek.  It  would  be  fair  to 
say  that  there  was  no  English  gram- 
mar at  that  time,  as  in  fact  there  has 
never  been.  To  endow  a  free  gram- 
mar school  meant  that  the  boys  of 
its  neighborhood  should  be  taught 
without  charge  to  read  Latin  and 
Greek.  It  really  happens  in  England 
to  this  day,  that  a  boy  may  go  to  an 
endowed  school  and  receive  free  edu- 
cation in  Latin  and  Greek  whose 
friends  would  have  to  pay  for  in- 
struction in  German  and  French  in 
the  same  school.  With  us  a  free 
school  means  one  which  makes  no  pe- 
cuniary charge  for  any  scholar.  In 
England  a  free  grammar  school  may 
mean  a  school  where  the  classical 
languages  so  called,  are  taught  to  all 
comers,  while  for  other  studies  a  pay- 
ment is  exacted.  This  was  in  general 
the  expression  of  a  pious  wish  that 
the  languages  of  the  Vulgate  and  Sep- 
tuagint,  the  Latin  and  Greek  versions 
Of  the  scriptures,  might  be  widely 
known  among  the  people." 

At  about  the  time  Thomas  Vose 
made  his  donation  to  assist  in  the 
foimding    of   a    free    school    in     Lan- 


cashire, England,  steps  were  taken  by 
the  Puritans  in  Dorchester,  New  Eng- 
land, to  establish,  with  a  different 
basis,  a  free  school  here,  said  to  be 
the  first  public  provision  made  for  a 
free  school  in  America  by  a  direct  tax 
on  the  inhabitants  of  a  town.  The 
order  relating  to  it  reads  as  follows: 
"It  is  ordered  that  the  20th  of  May, 
1639,  that  there  shall  be  a  rent  of  201s 
yearly  forevr  imposed  upon  Tomson'a 
Hand  to  bee  payd  by  evy  p'son  that 
hath  p'prtie  in  the  said  Hand  accord- 
ing to  the  p'portion  that  any  such 
p'son  shall  fro  tyme  to  tyme  inioy 
and  posesse  there,  and  this  towards 
the  mayntenance  of  a  sclioole  in  Dor- 
chestr  this  rent  of  2013  yeerly  to  be 
payd  to  such  a  schoolmaster  as  shall 
undertake  to  teach  english,  latiu 
and  other  tongues,  and  also  writing  the 
sayd  schoolmaste  to  bee  chosen  fro 
tyme  to  tyme  p  the  freemen  and  that 
is  left  to  the  discretion  of  elders  and 
the  7  men  for  the  tyme  beeing  wheth- 
er maydes  shalbe  taught  with  the 
boyes  or  not." 

^he  rules  and  orders  presented  to 
the  town  and  confirmed  by  vote  later 
concerning  the  school  were  to  the 
end  that,  all  things  that  concern  the 
school  shall  be  ordered  and  disposed 
in  the  way  "most  conducible  for  the 
glory  of  God,  and  the  trayning  up  of 
the  children  of  the  towne  in  religion, 
learning  and  Civilitie." 

In  1647  the  Colonial  government 
passed  the  following  law  in  regard  to 
schools:  "It  being  one  chief  project 
of  Satan  to  keep  men  from  the  know- 
ledge of  the  Scripture,  as  in  former 
times  keeping  them  in  unknown 
tongues,  so  in  these  latter  times  by 
perswading  from  the  use  of  tongues 
that  so  at  least  the  true  sence  and 
meaning  of  the  originall  might  be 
clouded  and  corrupted  with  false 
classes  of  deceivers,  to  the  end  there- 
fore that  learning  may  not  be  Buried 
in  the  graves  of  our  forefathers  in 
Church  and  Commonwealth,  the  Lord 
attending  our  endeavors.  It  is  there- 
fore ordered  by  this  Court  and  Author- 
ity thereof,  that  every  Township  in 
this  Jurisdiction,  after  the  Lord  has 
increased  them  to  the  number  of  fifty 
householders,  shall  then  forthwith  ap- 
point one  within  their  towns  to  teach 


ROBERT    VOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


all  such  cliildren  as  shall  resort  to 
Mm  to  Write  and  Read,  where  Wages 
shall  be  payd,  either  by  the  Parents 
or  Masters  of  such  children  or  by  the 
inhabitants  in  generall,  by  way  of 
supply  as  the  major  part  of  them  that 
order  the  prudentials  of  the  town 
shall  appoint,  Provided  that  those 
which  send  their  children  be  not 
Oppressed  by  paying  much  more  than 


they    can    have    them    taught    for    in 
other  towns." 

Thus  we  see,  as  Dr.  Hale  says,  "just 
the  same  wish  expressed  itself  in  our 
early  New  England  legislation,  which 
provided  that  boys  should  have  a  free 
education  in  the  classical  languages  to 
the  end  that  Satan  might  be  foiled  in 
his  wish  to  keep  the  Bible  from  man- 
kind." 


HIS  ARRIVAL  IN  NEW  ENGLAND  AND  SETTLEMENT 

IN  MILTON 


Returning  to  affairs  in  England  we 
find  that  the  knowledge  and  experi- 
ence gained  on  the  Lancashire  church 
surveys  of  165U  was  valuable  prepara- 
tion for  the  work  Robert  Vose  was  to 
perform  later  in  New  England.  In 
1650,  as  has  been  shown,  he  was  still  in 
Lancashire,  England.  Whatever  part 
Richard  Mather  may  have  played  in 
the  next  important  step  in  Robert 
Vose's  career  is  only  matter  of  con- 
jecture. But  in  1654  we  find  Robert 
Vose  in  Dorchester,  New  England, 
purchaser  of  the  large  estate  of  the 
late  John  Glover,  and  it  is  not  sur- 
prising to  find  Richard  Mather  a 
witness  to  the  deed  of  conveyance, 
showing  the  two  Lancashire  men  had 
met  again  in  New  Eligland. 

John  Glover,  Richard  Mather  and 
Robert  Vose  were  all  from  Lancashire, 
but  did  not  come  to  New  England  at 
the  same  time.  With  Robert  Vose 
cam?  his  Avife  Jane,  two  daughters, 
and  three  sons;  the  eldest  son  died  in 
Milton,    unmarried. 

Robert  Vose  was  now  a  man  of 
fifty  and  more,  versed  in  civil  and 
ecclesiastical  affairs;  possessed  of 
material  resources,  and  well  qualified 
to  be  a  leader  in  the  community 
where  he  had  cast  in  his  lot. 

By  the  purchase  of  the  land  belong- 
ing to  the  heirs  of  John  Glover,  he 
became  the  largest  resident  landhold- 
er in  Milton  at  the  time  of  incorpora- 
tion. His  purchase  consisted  of  thir- 
teen separate  parcels  of  land  de- 
scribed in  a  verbose  deed  of  convey- 
ance, occupying  six  pages  of  printed 
matter,  in  which  the  names  of  Ann 
Glover,  executrix  of  the  estate,  and 
her  sons,  Mr.  Habakkuk  Glover,  Mr. 
John  Glover,  Mr.  Nathaniel  Glover  and 
Mr.  Pellatier  Glover,  their  heirs,  as- 
signs, executors  and  administrators 
are    mentioned    seventeen    times    and 


Mr.  Robert  Vose,  his  heirs,  assigns, 
executors  and  administrators  are 
mentioned  fifteen  times.  The  follow- 
ing are  the  different  parcels  acquired: 
A  farm  of  one  hundred  and 
forty  acres  and  dwelling  house; 
ten  acres  near  Robert  Redman; 
one  hundred  acres  on  Providence 
Plain;  twenty  acres  of  meadow 
adjoining;  thirty-five  acres  he  pur- 
chased of  John  Phillips  adjoining  the 
farm;  thirty  acres  adjoining  the 
above  lot;  one  half  of  two  lots  of 
common  land  on  south  side  of  the  Ne- 
ponset  river;  forty  acres  of  meadow 
near  Mr.  Stoughton's  farm;  forty 
acres  of  upland  near  the  Blue  Hills; 
a  certain  "scurt"  of  land  near  the 
"playne;"  three-quarters  of  an  acre 
for  a  landing  place  below  Mistress 
Stoughton's  mill;  six  acres  of  salt 
marsh,  and  other  lands  not  specifi- 
cally accounted  for,  amounting  in  all, 
not  including  the  latter,  to  over  five 
hundred  acres. 

In  1838,  an  ancient  plan  of  Milton 
on  parchment  was  discovered  among 
the  papers  belonging  to  the  Proprie- 
tors of  Dorchester,  inscribed  with  the 
■"^-  memorandum: — "This  plan 
was  drawn  on  a  paper  plat  formerly 
made  by  Mr.  John  Oliver  for  the 
Town  of  Dorchester,  and  now  by 
their  order  is  drawn  on  parchment 
by  Joshua  Fisher,  April  25,  1661."  John 
Oliver  died  in  1646.  The  following  en- 
try occurs  in  the  Dorchester  Town 
Records:  "9  (7)  1661,  40  shillings 
that  Lieutenant  Fisher  had  for  new 
drawing  of  the  map." 

This  plan  furnishes  the  outlines  of 
the  town  of  Milton  at  the  time  the 
first  grants  were  taken  up.  Among 
these  is  outlined  a  part  of  the  grant 
to  John  Glover  from  the  town  of  Dor- 
chester in  1644  and  sold  to  Robert 
Vose  in  1654.  It  is   thus  described  in 


ROBERT    VOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


the  deed:  "All  that  Dwelling  house 
and  farme  Where  now  Nicholas  Wood 
dwells  with  ye  barne  Cowhouses  out- 
houses yards  orchards  gardins  with 
"Whatsoever  privileges  unto  ye  said 
house  is  hereunto  belongeing  or  Ap- 
pertayneing  wth  seaven  score  acres 
of  Upland  and  meadow  more  or  less, 
within  fence  lying  about  ye  said 
house,  upon  wch  ye  said  house  stand- 
eth,  wth  a  parcell  of  Lande  abou* 
tenne  acres  more  or  less  between  tTie 
ca!fe    pasture    and    Robert    Redmans." 


handed  down  from  father  to  son  to 
the  fifth  generation  of  Voses.  It  stood 
at  the  junction  of  Canton  avenue  and 
Brook  Road,  where  the  cellar  was  in 
evidence  up  to  the  middle  of  the  last 
century. 

The  westerly  bound  of  the  home- 
stead ran  northwest  from  some  point 
on  Canton  Avenue,  not  far  from  the 
Town  Hall  lot,  straight  to  the  brook, 
probably  including  the  land  on  which 
the  Vose  school  building  stands;  the 
northerly    bound    followed    the    brook 


SITE  OF  ROBERT    VOSE'S    HOUbE. 


Nicholas  Wood  here  mentioned  came 
over  from  the  old  country  with  Mr. 
Glover,  and,  as  his  agent  or  farmer, 
had  charge  of  the  cattle  kept  at  the 
farm  west  of  Milton  Hill. 

This  farm  embracing  a  wide  terri- 
tory of  one  hundred  and  seventy-six 
acres,  as  outlined  on  the  plat,  be- 
came the  homestead  of  Robert  Vose. 
The  house  here  described  was  known 
as   the    "old    Vose   house"     and     was 


as  it  winds  to  its  bend  just  beyond 
Ruggles  Lane;  the  easterly  bound 
ran  from  the  last  mentioned  point, 
along  the  westerly  slope  of  Milton 
Hill  between  Russell  and  School 
Streets  to  Churchill's  Lane,  including 
the  Glover  school  lot  and  other  es- 
tates on  School  street,  and  the  West- 
on estate  and  land  formerly  of  Mrs. 
Francis  Cunningham;  the  southerly 
bound    was    the    parallel    line    to   the 


HIS  ARRIVAL  IN  NEW  ENGLAND  AND   SETTLEMENT  IN   MILTON 


point  of  beginning.  Although  Robert 
Vose's  territory  extended  south  of  it, 
the  parallel  line  is  described  as  the 
southerly  boundary  of  the  homestead. 
The  parallel  line  marked  by  a 
stone  wall,  ran  from  the  southwest- 
erly slope  of  Milton  Hill  on  the  east 
to  the  fresh  meadows  or  present  Can- 
ton line  on  the  west.  After  the  town 
of  Milton  was  incorporated,  the  road 
now  known  as  Canton  Avenue  was 
laid  out  on  this  central  parallel  line 
from  Atherton's  tavern  to  Centre 
Street.  "The  line  continued  from  Cen- 
tre Street  to  Vose's  Lane  and  still  on 
straight,  north  of  the  Blanchard 
estate  to  Randolph  Avenue.  From  here 
until  it  reached  Churchill's  Lane  just 
beyond  where  the  sewer  crosses,  it 
has  become  extinct  by  later  trans- 
fers." 

Although  Robert  Vose  was  not  a 
church  member,  he  was  active  and 
zealous  in  the  maintenance  and  ad- 
vancement of  the  ministry.  His  ser- 
vice on  the  Lancashire  church  sur- 
veys had  no  doubt  given  him  inter- 
est and  understanding  of  the  needs 
of  the  clergy,  and  in  1662i  he  made  a 
gratuitous  conveyance  of  eight 
acres  of  his  estate  to  the  town  for 
"ministerial  purposes." 

On  the  land  thus  donated  was  built 
a  parsonage  or  ministerial  house,  by 
eighteen  of  the  inhabitants  or  free- 
holders of  the  town  of  Milton,  who 
"covenant  and  agree  yt  ye  sd  house 
and  land,  shall  be  and  remain  to  be 
to  ye  use  and  behoof  of  such  Minis- 
ter as  God  shall  successively  from 
time  to  time  send  amongst  us."  This 
was  in  accordance  with  an  order  of 
The  first  Court  of  Assistants  holden 
at  Charlton  (Charlestcwn),  August 
23th  Ano  Dm  1G30.  Imp'r,  it  was 
ppounded  howe  the  ministers  should 
be  mayntayned  ....  It  was  ordered 
that  houses  should  be  built  for  them 
with  convenient  speede,  att  the  pub- 
lique   charge." 

The  location  of  the  "ministerial 
lot"  had  been  accepted  until  recently 
as  on  Vose's  Lane  and  Centre  Street; 
it  is  so  stated  in  the  History  of  Mil- 
ton; but  Mr.  John  A.  Tucker  in  his 
exhaustive  research  has  shown  con- 
clusively that  the  lot  was  in  that  part 


of  Robert  Vose's  farm  described  in 
the  deed  of  conveyance  as  "a  parcell 
of  land  about  tenne  acres  more  or 
less  lying  between  the  calf  pasture 
and  Robert  Redman's."  It  took  a  part 
of  the  tract  now  occupied  by  the  Wes- 
ton, Johnson,  Apthorp  and  Peabody 
estates  on  the  east  of  Randolph  Ave- 
nue, reaching  back  to  Churchill's 
Lane,  and  by  the  Beck,  Emerson, 
Wood  and  Sigourney  property  on  the 
west  side  of  the  avenue.  An  old  wall 
at  the  rear  of  the  last  mentioned  es- 
tates was  probably  the  bound  on  the 
west  end  of  this  ten-acre  lot,  and  be- 
yond that  was  the  lot  called  the  calf 
pasture.  The  southern  boundary  was 
the  swamp.  The  parsonage  was  on 
Churchill's  Lane  and  at  the  head  of 
the  lane  stood  the  first  meeting- 
house. 

In  1681,  after  the  ordination  of  Rev. 
Peter  Thacher,  the  first  settled  minis- 
ter of  Milton,  the  town  voted  to  con- 
vey to  him  twenty  acres  of  the  minis- 
terial land  near  the  centre  of  the 
town. 

Notwithstanding  the  possession  of 
this  land,  Mr.  Thacher  continued  to 
live  in  the  parsonage  on  Churchill's 
Lane  until  1689,  when  he  built  a  new 
house  for  himself  on  Providence 
Plain,  on  land  which  he  had  pur- 
chased of  Thomas  Vose  in  1683,  and 
which  adjoined  the  ministerial  land 
given  him.  The  old  parsonage  on 
Churchill's  Lane,  having  served  its 
purpose,  was  then  sold  to  Robert 
Vose's  son  Edward,  who  held  adja- 
cent lands. 

Some  of  us  recall  the  old  house 
that  used  to  stand  near  the  private 
way  running  between  Churchill's  Lane 
and  Randolph  Avenue;  it  was  called, 
"the  Hollis  House."  Mr.  Tucker  says: 
"It  is  said  to  have  been  an  old  Vose 
house,  audit  is  barely  possible  it  was- 
the  same  house  which  served  for  the 
parsonage  in  Peter  Thacher's  day.  Not 
many  years  ago  the  house  was  burn- 
ed. The  parsonage  or  its  successor 
appears  to  have  been  the  only  house 
on  what  was  the  eight  acre  ministry 
grounds  till  Thomas  Hollis,  Jr.,  built 
the   Sigourney   house   about   1834." 

When  Robert  Vose  settled  here 
in   1654,   there   was   not  a      recorded 


1(.(;BERT    VOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


road  in  this  part  of  Dorcliester,  south 
of  the  Neponset,  and  no  way  across 
the  river  except  by  a  ford.  Mistress 
Stoughton  had  a  foot-bridge  with  a 
hand-rail  by  the  mill.  In  1664  there 
were  three  recorded  roads  in  the 
town;  the  "country  Heigh  Waye"  over 
Milton  Hill,  now  Adams  Street,  laid 
out  in  1654;  "the  way  from  the  land- 
ing place  by  the  mill  through  Robert 
Vose's  farm"  now  Canton  Avenue, 
166(>;  and  "the  way  to  John  Ffennos 
house  leading  to  the  Blue  Hills."  now 
Churchiirs   Lane,   1661. 

Brook  Road,  leading  from  Vose's 
Lane,  by  the  Vose  school  building, 
and  crossing  the  brook  is  an  ancient 
way,   shown  by  the  following  record: 

At  a  meeting  of  the  Selectmen  the 


8  (11)  1671,  "The  same  day  Thomas 
Swiit  Junr  as  selectman  of  Melton 
came  before  the  select  men,  to  be  re- 
solved in  a  question  concerning  a  way 
runing  through  Goodman  Vose  his 
farme  from  John  Gil's  barrs  unto  the 
fowerteenth  lott,  whether  ther  should 
not  be  alowance  for  the  land  which 
the  way  taks  upp;  In  answer  thereun- 
to the  Select  men  of  Dorchester  saith, 
that  the  use  of  the  way  and  the  right 
thereunto  was  long  before  Goodman 
Vosse,  or  Mr.  Glover  had  a  farme 
granted  or  laid  out,  and  therefore  we 
conclud  that  when  the  farme  was 
laid  out,  there  was  alowance  in  meas- 
uer  for  the  highway,  and  nothing  de- 
manded for  alowance  ever  since  until 
of     late." 


MILTON  IN  1662 


In  1659  Robert  Vose  was  one  of  tlie 
four  men  chosen  as  a  committee  for 
the  laying  out  of  the  Common  Lands, 
and  in  1662  he  was  one  of  the  three 
petitioners  for  the  incorporation  of 
Milton. 

The  town  then  was  for  the  most 
part  a  wilderness,  with  a  few  scat- 
tered farms  and  some  open  pasturage 
land.  The  huge  task  these  early  set- 
tlers undertook  was  to  make  this 
strange  wilderness  habitable,  and  to 
that  end  all  shared  the  labor  and 
hardships  alike.  One  of  the  first 
things  to  be  done,  as  shown  by  the 
records,  was  to  run  the  boundary  lines 
which  at  this  early  period,  were  not 
definitely  established,  between  Dor- 
chester and  Roxbury,  Dorchester  and 
Braintree,  or  the  several  grants  of 
lots.  There  was  laying  out  of  lots, 
and  highways;  fixing  pales  about  the 
lots;  keeping  in  order  all  fences 
about  their  own  farms,  as  required  by 
law;  keeping  their  cattle,  horses, 
sheep,  swine  and  goats  within  pre- 
scribed bounds;  the  cattle  branded 
and  the  swine  ringed  and  yoked  as 
required;  killing  wolves  which  infest- 
ed the  region  and  for  which  a  bounty 
■was  paid;  (The  same  Day,  8:  12, 
1657,  the  constable,  John  Capen,  was 
to  pay  unto  Robert  Vose  for  a  wolfe, 
1-0-0.")  felling  and  hewing  trees  for 
building  timber  and  fencing  as  per- 
mitted; bringing  their  land  under  a 
state  of  cultivation  and  then  making 
war  on  the  blackbirds  that  destroyed 
their  crops;  ordering  and  conducting 
the  affairs  of  the  town;  meeting  the 
problem  of  taxes,  of  which  that  for  the 
support  of  the  ministry  was  no  small 
I»art;  and  performing  military  service 
during  Indian  hostilities.  In  the  In- 
dian disturbances  of  1675-6  the  outly- 
ing districts  even  in  Milton  were 
deemed  unsafe  on  acocunt  of  them. 
William  Trescott,  who  lived  on  the 
farm   afterwards    belonging   to     Hon. 


James  M.  Robbins,  asked  for  the 
"abatement  of  his  taxes  1675-6,  be- 
cause of  the  troubles  of  the  wars, 
whereby  he  deserted  his  place  at 
Brush   Hill." 

Nearly  opposite  Robbins  Street  is 
a  lane  leading  from  Canton  Avenue 
towards  the  Blue  Hills  Reservation, 
once  known  as  "the  way  over  to  the 
Old  Wolfe  Pets;"  it  runs  in  a  south- 
erly direction  and  in  former  times, 
turning  easterly,  crossed  Pine  Tree 
brook  and  continued  through  the 
Town  Farm  lot  and  the  Russell  estate 
to  land  formerly  of  Samuel  Wads- 
worth.  In  1698  Gov.  William  Stough- 
ton  sold  to  William  Sumner  five  acres 
of  land,  described  in  the  deed  of  con- 
veyance as  "South  of  the  Brook  that 
runs  under  the  Pine  Tree  bridge  and 
below  the  path  that  goes  over  the 
Brook  aboves'd  a  little  below  a  little 
fresh  meadow"  which  lies  at  the  place 
known  and  called  by  the  name  of  the 
Wolfe  Pitts."  This  locality  is  on  the 
southerly  side  of  Canton  Avenue  in 
the  neighborhood  of  Harland  Street. 
West  of  Highland  Street,  now  partly 
included  in  the  estate  of  Philip  P. 
Chase  is  a  tract  of  land  known  as  the 
"Wolf  Pit  lot."  The  pits  were  covered 
over  with  brush  not  strong  enough  to 
bear  the  weight  of  a  wolf,  and  baited 
with  the  carcass  of  a  sheep  or  some 
other  animal.  Once  caught  in  the 
pit,  it  was  impossible  for  the  wolf  to 
spring  out  again. 

It  will  give  us  an  idea  of  the  sparse 
settlement  of  Milton  at  that  time  to 
learn  in  what  part  of  the  town  the 
eighteen  inhabitants  lived  who  signed 
the  covenant  in  regard  to  the  minis- 
terial house  and  land,  for  they  prob- 
ably comprised  the  entire  number  of 
freeholders  then  constituting  the  town 
of  Milton;  the  majority  of  them  held 
by  turns  nearly  every  town  office,  and 
many  of  them  lived  to  four  score 
years  of  age.     Seven  of  the  eighteen 


llOiiERT    VOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


names  are  borne  by  families,  lineal 
descendants,  living  in  the  town  today. 

First  in  the  list  of  signers  is  Rob- 
ert Vose,  whose  place  of  residence  at 
the  junction  of  Canton  avenue  and 
Brook  Road,  has  already  been  de- 
scribed. 

Anthony  Gulliver's  house  stood  on 
Squantum  Street  on  the  north  side  of 
Unquity  brook. 

Samuel  Wadsworth,  who  later  lost 
his  life  in  King  Phillip's  war, 
lived  in  a  house  that  stood  in  the 
triangle  formed  by  Randolph  Avenue, 
Highland  Street  and  Reed's  Lane.  The 
house  is  said  to  have  been  burned  in 
1669. 

Thomas  Vose  lived  on  Gun  Hill 
Street. 

Robert  Redman  lived  on  Churchill's 
Lane,  and  John  Fenno  was  his  neigh- 
bor on  the  east  side  of  the  lane. 

Robert  Babcock's  house  stood  on 
the  site  of  Mr.  T.  Edwin  Ruggles's 
house  on  Ruggles  Lane.  The  oldest 
part  of  the  house  is  said  to  be  the 
original  Badcock  house.  The  brook 
is  styled  in  old  records  "Robert 
Badcock's   river." 

James  H often  or  Houghton,  bought 
of  Nicholas  Ellen  and  Mary,  his 
wife,  who  Tvas  the  widow  of  Rob- 
ert Pond,  the  house  and  land  on  both 
sides  Lincoln  Street  that  belonged  to 
Robert  Pond.  He  may  have  lived 
there. 

Robert  Tucker  lived  on  Brush  Hill 
"at  the  upper  end  of  the  old  high- 
way where  it  joined  Brush  Hill  Road." 
His  house,  as  indicated  in  his  will, 
stood  on  the  southwest  corner  of 
Robbins  Street  and  Brush  Hill  Road. 

David  Himes's  residence  has  not 
been  ascertained.  Nothing  has  been 
foand  to  show  that  he  was  a  land- 
holder. There  is  the  record  of  his 
marriage  in  Dorchester  and  the  birth 
of  four  children  in  Milton.  Accord- 
ing to  the  Dorchester  records  the 
Widow  Himes  suffered  under  the 
order  relating  to  the  entertainment 
of  strangers  in  that  town.  "The  9th 
(7)  1667.  The  same  day  William 
Sumner  was  desired  to  speak  with 
the  Widdow  Hims  (who  is  lately  come 
into   this   town)    to   informe   her   that 


she  must  returne  to  the  place  from 
whence  she  came."  This  was  in  ac- 
cordance with  a  Colonial  law,  "That 
noe  p'son  should  take  into  ther 
house  ore  habitation  any  p'son  with- 
out the  alowance  ore  consent  off  the 
selectmen  upon  such  penalty  as  the 
selectmen  shall  see  good  to  lay  upon 
them." 

William  Salisbury  lived  on 
Churchill's  Lane  and  abutted  Robert 
Vose  on  the  south.  Anthony  New- 
ton owned  land  east  of  him  nearer 
Gulliver's  Creek.  Both  men  were  in- 
terested in  shipbuilding  that  was  car- 
ried on  at  a  very  early  date,  at  or 
near  the  landing  place,  now  Gulli- 
ver's Creek. 

Thomas  Swift  lived  on  the  south- 
west side  of  Adams  Street  near 
Dudley  Road  of  today;  the  house 
stood  in  the  field  about  forty  rods 
back  from  the  street. 

William  Daniel  lived  and  kept  a 
tavern  where  the  house  of  the  late 
Theodore  Glover  nov/  stands.  The 
Foye  mansion  occupied  the  same 
site  before  the  Glover  house  was 
built.  Tho  only  record  we  have  of 
the  Rev.  Mr.  Bouse  who  preached  as 
a  candidate  here  in  1670,  is  Good- 
man Daniel's  charge  of  one  shilling 
and  sixpence,  "for  bread  and  wine 
for  Mr.  Bouse."  The  town  record 
reads:  "It  was  agreed  by  vote  that 
Mr.  Bouse  should  be  desired  to  be 
helpful  to  us  by  way  of  trial."  Rev. 
Mr.  Bouse  appears  to  have  been 
weighed  in  the  balance  and  found 
wanting. 

Richard  Collicott  was  here  very 
early  be^fore  the  arrival  of  the 
Dorchester  people.  He  was  a  fur 
trader  and  Brought  into  close  rela- 
tions with  the  Indians.  He  is  said 
to  have  built  the  first  house  in  Un- 
quity, (Milton)  on  the  west  side  of 
Adams  Street  near  the  junction  of 
Centre    Street. 

John  Gill  lived  in  Unquity  be>- 
fore  1652.  His  house  stood  on  the 
north  side  of  Adams  Street,  almost 
opposite  the  opening  of  Pleasant 
Street. 

Henry  Crane  lived  at  what  is 
now  East  Milton,  on  the  north  side 
of   Adams   Street.     His   house    stood 


MILTON     IN     1662 


back  from  the  street  between  the 
present  residences  of  Messrs.  Bax- 
ter and  Simpson.  His  eslate  was  the 
limit    of    the    town    in    ttiat    direction. 

Stephen  Kinsley's  house  stood 
on  the  north  side^  of  Adams  Street, 
on  land  now  owned  by  Ernest  Bow- 
ditch.  He  was  at  first  a  resident  of 
Braintree.  "In  1653  he  was  ordained 
as  a  ruling  elder  of  the  Braintree 
church,  removed  to  Unquity  at  an 
early  date,  and  instituted  religious 
worship  in  the  east  part  of  the  town 
in  connection  with  some  of  the  in- 
habitants of  Braintree.  The  services 
may  have  been  conducted  by  himself 
or  by  some  clergyman  of  whom  there 
is    no    mention    in    oar   records." 

"Regular  preaching  services  were 
held  in  Unquity  and  Milton  at  ]east 
twenty-two  years  before  a  church  was 
organized." 

It  is  not  to  be  supposed  that  the 
brethren  here  were  more  contentious 
than  those  elsewhere.  But  whatever 
the  reason,  there  was  no  church  or- 
ganization in  Milton  until  1678,  six- 
teen years  after  the  incorporation  of 
the  town,  and  then,  according  to  the 
records,  "becaus  of  some  oppossision 
yt  did  appear,"  the  Milton  Church  was 
organized  in  the  Mother  church  at 
Dorchester. 

Ministers  were  settled  by  the 
towns  in  town  meetings  and 
the  salary  was  established  and 
voted,  and  in  1654,  "that  there 
may  be  a  settled  and  encourag- 
ing maintenance  of  ministers  in  all 
towns  and  congregations  within  their 
jurisdiction,  it  is  ordered  that  the 
county  court  in  every  shire  shall,  up- 
on information  given  them,  of  any 
defect  of  any  congregation  or  town 
within  the  shire,  order  and  appoint 
what  maintenance  shall  be  allowed 
the  ministers  of  the  places  and  shall 
issue  out  warrants  to  the  Selectmen 
to  assess  the  Inhabitants,  which  the 
constable  of  the  said  town  shall  col- 
lect  ahd   levy   as   other  Town   rates." 

The  Town  Meeting  was  an  open, 
free,  deliberative  assembly,  where 
affairs  of  the  church  and  local  gov- 
ernment were  discussed  and  settled 
with  outspoken  independence.  Liber- 
ty of  discussion  in  town  meetings, 
at  length  had  to  be  curbed.     In  1645 


it  was  voted  by  the  inhabitants  of 
Dorchester  that  in  order  to  prevent 
"the  disorderly  Jarringe  of  our  Meet- 
inges  and  the  intemperate  clashings 
and  hasty  indigested  and  Rash  votes, 
that  votes  of  any  concernment  be  first 
drawne  up  in  meetinge  and  then  de- 
liberately published  2  or  3  tymes  and 
Liberty  given  for  any  to  speake  his 
mind  moderately  and  meekly  and  then 
the  Signe  to  be  required,  and  things 
more   orderly   carried    and   dispach'd." 

In  the  early  days  the  meeting- 
house was  not  considered  a  sacred  ed- 
ifice, "Until  after  the  Revolutionary 
War  it  was  universally  used  as  a  pow- 
der magazine."  It  was  used  for  town- 
meetings  and  also  served  as  a  store- 
house. "Squirrels  attracted  by  the 
grain  stored  in  the  loft,  ex- 
ercised their  nibbling  habit  on 
Bible  and  pulpit  cushions,  so 
that  in  some  localities  on  every 
Sunday  afternoon  the  Word  of 
God  and  its  sustaining  cushion  had  ta 
be  removed  to  the  safe  shelter  of  a 
neighboring  farm  house  or  tavern  to 
prevent  total  annihilation  by  these 
Puritanical,  Bible-loving  squirrels." 
On  the  meeting-house  were  posted 
matters  of  public  interest,  marriage 
intentions,  notices,  orders  and  regula- 
tions, sales  etc.  The  following  has. 
been    preserved: 

"Strayes. 
Milton,  Jan.  24.  1672. 

There  is  in  the  hands  of  Thomas 
Voss  of  Milton,  two  steers  about  3 
yeares  old,  the  one  red  with  two 
Nicks  in  the  off  ear,  and  a  short 
tayle,  the  other  black  with  two  white 
Leggs  behind,  and  ye  end  of  his  tayle 
white,  a  Piece  cut  out  of  his  off  ear, 
they  wer  taken  up  the  26  Xbr  last 
and  were  Prized  by  Thomas  Swift 
and  Samuel  Wadsworth  both  at  4 
pounds,  haveing  been  cried  three 
times  according  to  Law." 

The  wolf-killer  was  ordered  to 
bring  the  gory  head,  if  he  wished  to 
obtain  the  reward,  and  "nayle  it  to 
the  meeting  house  and  give  notis 
thereof."  On  the  green  stood  the 
horse-blocks  to  aid  the  women  and 
the  old  men  to  mount  and  dismount, 
and  also  "those  Puritanical  instru- 
ments of  punishment,  the  stocks, 
whipping  post,  pillory  and  cage." 


ROBERT    VOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


■'Our  Puritan  fathers  made  it  a  mat- 
ter of  conscience  to  call  the  days  of 
the  week  by  numerals,  and  to  call 
the  months  in  the  same  way,  as  the 
<^uakers  do  to  this  day  .  .  .  They 
thought  it  was  giving  honor  to  the 
heathen  gods,  and  to  pagan  worship, 
to  call  their  days  Sunday  or  Monday 
■or  Tuesday  or  Wednesday,  or  to  call 
their  months  January  or  March  or 
May.  But  while  this  scruple  has  been 
so  tenacious  among  the  Friends,  that 
even  Mr.  Whittier  continued  to  follow 
it  as  long  as  he  lived,  our  Puritan 
fathers  had  laid  it  aside  before  their 
colonies  had  completed  their  first  cen- 
tury." 

Geo.  E.  Ellis,  contrasting  New  Eng- 
land history  during  its  Puritan  age 
with  the  contemporary  history  of  the 
Puritans  wiio  remained  in  England, 
says:    "The    influences    of   their    exile 


with  deprivations  and  hardships,  and 
their  freedom  to  follow  out  to  ex- 
tremes their  own  proclivities,  pre- 
judices and  fancies  tended  to  an  ex- 
aggeration of  the  natural  austerity  of 
the  Puritanism  here  while  it  was  held 
in  restraint  among  Puritans  at  home. 
The  ivy-clad  churches  and  towers, 
the  chime  of  bells,  the  sports  on  the 
green,  the  village  festivals,  the  bridal 
revelries  and  the  holiday  delights,  all 
entering  into  the  heritage  of  'Merry 
England,'  were  not  without  their  soft- 
ening and  amiable  working  upon  the 
sentiments  even  of  those  least  in  sym- 
pathy with  them  because  of  their  Pur- 
itan spirit.  But  the  exiles  here  part- 
ed with  all  these  mute  and  pleading 
influences  which  soften  and  enrich 
the  heart  and  cheer  the  routine  of  toil 
and  brighten  the  family  home." 


SECOND  MEETING  HOUSE  AND  VOSE'S  LANE 


Good  Peter  Thacher  evideatly  had 
misgivings  about  his  ability  to  shep- 
herd the  wilful  Milton  flock,  for  in 
his  address  accepting  the  call  to  the 
church,  after  a  residence  of  nine 
months  among  the  people,  he  makes 
this  significant  remark:  "Notwith- 
standing. .  .  my  great  discourage- 
ments in  the  work  of  the  ministry,  not 
only  in  respect  of  ye  great  duty  and 
difficulty  of  ye  work  in  itself  consid- 
ered, but  especially  in  ys  place  in 
respect  of  those  lamentable  animos- 
ityes  and  divisions  which  have  been 
in  ys  place,  which  both  occasioned 
your  unsettlement  untill  now  wch  ye 
Lord  for  his  own  name  sake  pardon, 
and   prevent   for  ye  future.'" 

About  1670  when  the  building  of  the 
second  meeting-house  was  under  con- 
sideration, the  first  action  taken  in  the 
matter  was  at  a  town  meeting  held 
Sept.  30,  1670,  when  it  was  decided  to 
locate  the  new  meeting  house  "neare 
about  Goodman  Vose  his  loked  barre 
and  also  that  the  old  meeting  house 
should  be   repaired." 

"The  vote  of  the  town  in  regard  to 
this  place  for  the  meeting  house  not 
being  agreeable  to  Goodman  Vose,  the 
town  early  the  next  year,  Jan.  12, 
1671,  voted  that  the  house  should 
stand  upon  the  'est  side  of  Goodman 
Vose's  Lande  at  the  corner  of  his  son 
Thomas  Vose's  stone  wall  next  to 
Henry  Glover  his  house  on  the  way 
sid  and  Robert  Vose  did  agree  there- 
unto.' This  situation  for  a  meeting 
house  would  have  had  the  advantage 
of  being  near  the  cemetery.  But 
though  the  number  of  inhabitants  was 
limited  there  still  appeared  a  lack  of 
harmony  causing  another  delay,  and  it 
was  nearly  a  year  later  when  a  final 
decision  was  made." 

"This  appears  from  the  following 
extract  taken  from  the  town  records: 
'At  a  public  meeting  in  Milton  the 
nth  of  the  nth  mo,  1671,  it  was  vot- 


ed in  the  town  that  the  meeting  house 
shall  be  sot  upon  Goodman  Vose's 
land  near  the  locke  bars  and  ye  nei- 
bors  .  .  .  did  freely  consent  thereun- 
to, also  the  town  did  purchase  of 
Goodman  Vose  6  rods  square  of  land 
for  to  set  the  meeting  house  on  and 
for  consideration  the  6  rods  square 
the  town  was  to  allow  Thomas  Vose 
his  rat  to  the  meeting  house  freely.' 

The  spot  thus  chosen  was  on  the 
corner  of  Vose's  Lane  and  Centre 
Street,  and  occupied  about  two-thirds 
of  the   present   Blanchard   estate." 

First  and  last  the  locating  of  the 
meeting  house  on  his  land  was  to 
Robert  Vose  the  source  of  consider- 
able annoyance.  After  the  meeting 
house  was  built,  a  highway  was  laid 
out  across  his  land  to  which  he  object- 
ed as  is  shown  by  the  following  town 
record:  "And  whereas,  the  above  said 
Committee,  namely  Capt.  Hopestill 
Foster,  Capt.  Richard  Bracket  and 
Sargt.  Thomas  Gardinner  in  the  year 
1673,  the  matter  being  left  to  them 
by  the  parties  concerned  as  the  rec- 
ord saith  did  then  order  and  alow  an 
open  hyew^ay  to  lye  and  run  from  the 
meeting  hous  down  to  robart  voses 
barn  and  from  thence  to  the  woods 
gate  but  it  being  greeuious  to  sd  Vose 
the  then  present  selectmen  upon  con- 
sideration did  agree  with  sd  vose  to 
take  of  and  remoue  said  way  prouid- 
ed  sd  vose  would  give  land  two  rods 
wide  from  the  woods  gate  on  the  out- 
side of  his  land  next  Robart  Bad- 
cocks  land  till  it  comes  to  the  para- 
rill  line,  to  be  an  open  hye  waye 
for  the  town's  use  w^hich  two  rods 
wide  of  land  hath  beene  left  and 
fenced  out  for  sd  use  and  seruis  and 
is  now  improued  for  a  waye  for  the 
town's  use  and  it  being  neglected  to 
make  a  record  of  sd  agreement  and 
remoueall  of  sd  way  in  the  time  of  it, 
we   the   present   select   men   in      this 


ROBERT    VOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


present  year,  1694  do  alow  and  con- 
firm the  aboiie  sd  agreement  and  re- 
mouall  of  sd  way  as  aboue  said  and  do 
make  record  of  the  same  this  26  day 
of  February  1694-5. 

Thomas    Vose,    Town    Clark." 
This   was   the   origin   of   Vose's   Lane. 

We  have  hints  of  Robert  Vose's 
personal  qualities.  That  he  was  pub- 
lic spirited  and  generous  is  shown  by 
his  gift  to  the  town  of  the  ministry 
lot.  That  he  was  a  stubborn  force 
when  opposed  to  a  measure,  is  shown 
by  his  attitude  towards  the  town  vote 
in  regard  to  the  location  of  the  sec- 
ond meeting-house.  We  must  infer 
that  he  was  a  man  of  hasty  temper 
from  the  fact  that  Parson  Thacher 
advised  him  to  stand  up  in  the  con- 
gregation and  acknowledge  it. 

"Father  Vose  was  with  me  I  spake 
to  him  to  acknowledge  his  passionate- 
ness  in  the  congregation."  Parson 
Thacher  also  jots  down  in  his  journal: 
'Difficulty  about  Father  Vose's  admis- 
sion to  the  church."  Whatever  the 
difficulty  was  it  was  overcome,  for  on 
.July  17,  168r,  Father  Vose  was  re- 
ceived into  full  communion  with  the 
Milton  church. 

In  1657  Robert's  daughter  Elizabeth 
married  Thomas  Swift,  son  of  Thomas 
Swift,  senior,  the  emigrant  from  Eng- 
land, and  in  1659  her  father  gave  her 
verbally  nineteen  and  three-quarters 
acres  in  the  eleventh  lot.  This  he 
confirmed  by  deed  Feb.  23,  1663.  The 
tract  of  land  was  south  of  the  par- 
allel line  and  extended  towards  the 
Braintree  line;  it  included  the  estate 
of  Mr.  Tuell,  part  of  the  estate  of  Mr. 
Wallace  Pierce,  and  others.  Traces 
of  the  old  wall  that  formed  the  bound- 
ary line  are  still  to  be  seen  on  the 
land  of  Mr.  Pierce. 

In  1661  he  gave  his  son  Thomas, 
probably  at  the  time  of  his  marriage, 
six  and  one-quarter  acres  of  land  west 
of  the  eighth  lot,  a  gift  which  he  con- 
firmed by  deed  in  April,  1672.  Thomas 
was  then  in  possession  of  the  premises 
which  were  on  the  west  side  of  Gun 
Hill   Street. 

On  May  23,  1666,  Robert  Vose  was 
admitted  to  the  freedom  of  the  Col- 
ony. Very  early  it  was  enacted  that 
freemen    should    be      restricted       to 


church  members;  it  was  in  force  un- 
til about  1664.  It  may  be  inferred 
that  Robert  did  not  become  freeman 
until  this  time  because  he  was  not  a 
churcli   member. 

In  1669  and  1677  he  was  one  of  the 
selectmen  of  Milton,  and  in  other 
years  served  on  various  committees 
appointed  to  look  after  the  welfare 
of   the  town. 

In  February,  1682,  he  gave  his  sorr 
Edward,  mentioning  him  as  his  "eld- 
est son  now  living,"  the  homestead  of 
seven  score  acres,  and  six  acres  of 
salt  marsh.  Edward  at  the  time  was 
living  on  the  farm  and  for  several 
years  had  lived  there;  snrl  a  con- 
tract of  even  date  with  this  instru- 
ment was  made  with  his  father,  for 
his  maintenance  during  life. 

Edward  died  m  his  eightieth  year 
leaving  most  of  the  homestead  to  his 
son  Nathaniel  w^ho  is  to  allow  him  "an 
honorable  and  comfortable  mainten- 
ance." A  portion  of  this  land  is  still 
held  by  Robert  Vose's  descendants  of 
the  eighth  generation. 

In  January,  1682,  Robert  Vose  sold 
to  his  son  Thomas,  for  228  pounds, 
more  than  half  of  his  entire  estate 
situated  in  different  parts  of  the  town. 
As  this  deed  locates  parts  of  Robert's 
estate  not  specifically  placed,  it  may 
be  well  to  mention  in  what  part  of 
the  town  they  were  situated. 

Seventy-one  acres,  more  or  less,  in 
the  northerly  half  of  the  9th  and  10th 
lots,  on  a  part  of  which,  at  tHat 
time,  Thomas's  dwelling  house  stood, 
was  land  south  of  the  parallel  line, 
some  eighty  acres  in  all,  extending 
nearly  to  Pleasant  Street  in  one  direc- 
tion and  from  Gun  Hill  Street  probably 
to  the  Sias  lot,  including  the  Barnard, 
now  Upton  estate,  and  others.  The 
dwelling  house  stood  on  the  west  side 
of  Gun  Hill  Street,  the  clump  of  lilac 
bushes  and  old  well  there  probably 
mark  the  exact   site. 

The  one  hundred  acres  on  Provi- 
dence Plain  were  granted  Mr.  Glover 
in  1644.  The  tract  is  described  in  the 
deed  of  Robert  to  Thomas  Vose  as  hav- 
ing two  houses  and  a  barn  standing 
upon  the  said  land  which  is  butted  and 
bounded:  "North,  Naponsett  River; 
east,    Ezra     Clapp;     south,     Balssons 


SECOND   MEETING  HOUSE  AND  VOSE'S   LANE 


Brook;  west,  Dorchester  Church  land." 
sections  of  an  old  stone  wall  some 
fourteen  rods  west  of  Thacher  Street 
still  mark,  here  and  there,  the  original 
boundary  on  the  east;  the  western 
bound  followed  the  line  of  an  old 
stone  wall,  west  of  Blue  Hill  Park- 
way. The  "twenty  acres  of  meadow 
adjoining"  extended  up  to  and  skirt- 
ed Pope's   ice  pond. 

The  entire  Vose  lot  of  one  hundred 
acres  on  Providence  Plain  finally  came 
into  the  possession  of  the  Thacher  fam- 
ily. To  the  twenty-three  acres  "with  a 
house  and  barn  standing  on  the  land" 
which     Parson     Thacher     bought     of 


Thomas  Vose  in  1683  for  his  home- 
stead, thirty-four  years  later  his  wife 
added  by  purchase  of  Henry,  son  of 
Thomas  Vose,  seventy-seven  acres  of 
upland  and  ten  acres  of  meadow. 
The  house  mentioned  in  the  deed 
of  Thomas  Vose  to  Parson 
Thacher  was  presumably  unfit  for  oc- 
cupancy as  he  built  a  new  house 
there  before  removing  from  the  par- 
sonage on   Churchill's   Lane. 

In  his  journal  Jan.  13,  1699,  he 
wrote:  "We  had  an  exceeding  great 
feat  of  wind  for  near  24  hours  which 
blew  down  my  little  house  and  the 
wind  was  southwest  and  very  cold." 


CUSTOMS  IN  ROBERT  VOSE'S  TIME— CLOSE  OF  LIFE 


It  was  in  1G89  that  Parsou  Thacher 
moved  to  his  new  house  on'  "Provi- 
dence Plain"  linown  thereafter  as 
Thacher  Plain,  and  here  he  lived  un- 
til his  death  in  1727,  ani  event  thus 
referred  to  by  Judge  Sewall  in  his 
Diary: 

•'lord's  day,  Dec.  17.  I  was  sur- 
prised to  hear  Mr.  Thacher  of  Milton, 
my  old  Friend,  prayed  for  as  danger- 
ously sick.  Next  day,  Dec.  18,  1727, 
I  am  informed  by  Mr.  Gerrish  that 
my  dear  friend  died  last  night;  which 
1  "doubt  bodes  ill  to  Milton  and  the 
Province,  his  dying  at  this  Time, 
though  in  the  77th  year  of  his  age. 
Deus  avertat  Omen! 

"Friday,  Dec.  22,  the  day  after  the 
fast,  was  inter'd.  Bearers  Rev.  Mr. 
Mehemiah  Walter,  Mr.  Joseph  Bax- 
ter, Mr.  John  Swift,  Mr.  Samuel  Hunt, 
Mr.  Joseph  Sewall,  Mr.  Thomas 
Prince.  I  was  inclined  before  and 
having  a  pair  of  Gloves  sent  me,  I 
determined  to  go  to  the  Funeral,  if 
the  Weather  prov'd  favorable,  which 
it  did,  and  I  hired  Blake's  coach  with 
four  Horses.  My  son.  "Sir.  Cooper  and 
Mr.  Prince  went  with  me.  Refreshed 
there  with  Meat  and  Drink,  got  thith- 
er about  half  an  hour  past  one.  It 
was  sad  to  see  triumphed  over  my 
dear  Friend!  I  rode  in  my  Coach  to 
the  Burying  place;  not  being  able  to 
get  nearer  by  reason  of  the  many 
Horses.  From  thence  went  directly  up 
the  Hill,  where  the  Smith's  shop,  and 
so  home  very  comfortably  and  easily, 
the  ground  being  mollified.  But  when 
I  came  to  my  own  Gate,  going  in,  I 
fell  down,  a  board  slipping  under  my 
Left  fool,  my  right  Legg  raised  off  the 
skin,  and  put  me  to  a  great  deal  of 
pain,  especially  when  'twas  washed 
with  rum.  It  was  good  for  me  that  I 
was  thus  afflicted  that  my  spirit 
might  be  brought  into  a  frame  more 
suitable  to  the  Solemnity,  which  is  apt 
to  be  too  light;  and  by  the  loss  of 
some  of  my   skin,   and   blood   I    might 


be  awakened  to  prepare  for  my  own. 
Dissolution.  Mr.  Walter  prayed  before 
the  corps  was  carried  out.  1  had  a 
pair  of  Gloves  sent  me  before  I  went, 
and  a  Ring  given  me  there.  Mr.  Mil- 
lar, the  church  of  England  minister, 
was  there.  At  this  Funeral  I  heard  of 
the  death  of  my  good  old  Tenant  Capt. 
-Nathaniel  Miles,  that  very  l-'riday 
morn.  I  have  now  been  at  the  Inter- 
ment of  four  of  my  Classmates.  . 
Now  I  can  go  to  no  more  Funerals  of 
my  classmates  nor  none  be  at  mine; 
for  the  survivors,  the  Kev.  Mr.  Sam- 
uel Mather,  at  Windsor  and  the  Rev. 
Mr.  Taylor  at  Westfield  are  one  hun- 
dred miles  off,  and  are  entirely  '^n- 
teelDled.  1  humbly  pray  that  Christ 
may  be  graciously  present  with  us  all 
Three  both  in  Life  and  in  Death,  and 
then  we  shall  safely  and  comfort  U)ly 
walk  through  the  shady  valley  that 
leads  to  Glory."  Judge  Sewall  was  the 
last    survivor  eventually. 

In  the  time  of  Robert  Vose,  Puri- 
tan ministers  were  not  permitted  to 
perform  the  marriage  service,  for  it 
was  a  purely  civil  contract,  nor  to  of- 
ttciate  at  funerals.  The  following  is 
from  the  "Annals  of  King's  Chapel": 
On  May  15,  lt)86,  the  frigate  'Rose' 
from  England  brought  the  Rev.  Robert 
Ratcliffe  the  first  minister  of  the  Eng- 
lish church  who  had  ever  come  com- 
missioned to  officiate  on  New  England 
soil.  It  was  proposed  that  he  should 
have  one  of  the  three  Congregational 
meeting-houses  for  services.  This, 
however,  was  denied  him,  but  he- 
was  allowed  the  use  of  the  library 
room  in  the  east  end  of  the  Town 
House  which  stood  where  the  Old 
State  House  now  stands.  Three 
days  later  on  Tuesday,  May  18,  Judge 
Sewall  thus  records  the  first  marriage- 
ceremony  by  a  clergyman  in  Ne\r 
England. 

"  Tuesday.  May  18.  A  great  wed- 
ding from  Milton,  and  are  married  by 
Mr.        Randolph's    chaplain        at    Mr^ 


ROBERT    YOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


Shrimpton's  accordin  to  ye  Service- 
Book,  a  little  after  Noon,  when  Pray- 
er was  had  at  ye  Town  House;  Was 
another  married  at  ye  same  time; 
The  former  was  Vosse's  son.  Bor- 
rowed a  ring.  'Tis  sd  they  having 
asked  Mr.  Cook  and  Addington,  and 
yy  declining  it,  went  after  to  ye  Presi- 
dent, and  he  sent  ym  to  ye  Parson.'  " 

The  contracting  parties  were  Hen- 
ry, grandson  of  Robert  Vose,  and  Eliz- 
abeth, daughter  of  Robert  Badcock, 
all  of  Milton. 

"Hutchinson  says:  'I  suppose  there 
had  been  no  instance  of  a  marriage 
lawfully  celebrated  by  a  layman  in 
England  when  they  (Puritans)  left  it. 
I  believe  there  was  no  instance  of 
marriage  by  a  clergyman  after  they  ar- 
rived,, during  their  charter,  but  it 
was  always  done  by  a  magistrate,  or 
by  persons  specially  appointed  for 
this  purpose.'  May  29,  1686,  after  the 
wedding  above  described,  Dudley 
issued  a  proclamation  authorising  the 
clerical  function." 

Early  New  England  funerals  are 
thus   described  by  Lechford: 

"At  Burials  nothing  is  read  nor  any 
Funeral  Sermon  made,  but  all  the 
neighborhood  or  a  good  company  of 
them  come  together  by  tolling  of  the 
bell,  and  carry  the  dead  solemnly  to 
his  grave  and  there  stand  by  him 
while  he  is  buried.  The  ministers  were 
commonly  present,"  but  took  no  part. 
One  of  the  old  Puritan  writers  said, 
"All  prayers  over  or  for  the  dead  are 
not  only  superstitions  and  vain,  but 
are  also  idolatry  and  against  the  plain 
scriptures  of  God." 

"After  60  or  70  years  a  few  min- 
isters began  to  pray  at  funerals  in 
Massachusetts,  and  Mather  says, 
about  1719,  in  many  towns  the  minis- 
ter made  a  prayer  at  the  house  and  a 
short  speech  at  the  grave;  in  other 
places  these  were  wholly  omitted." 

The  first  instance,  so  far  as  known 
of  a  prayer  at  a  funeral  in  Massachu 
setts,  was  at  the  burial  of  Rev.  Wil 
Ham  Adams  from  Roxbury  in  1685 
Judge  Sewall  has  noted  it  in  his  Diary 
"I  took  one  Spell  at  carrying  him 
Mir.  Wilson  (of  Medfield)  prayed  with 
the  company  before  they  went  to  the 
grave." 


"There  were,  as  a  rule,  two  sets  of 
bearers  appointed;  under-bearers,  usu- 
ally young  men,  who  carried  the  coffia 
on  a  bier;  and  pall-ibearers,  men  of 
age,  dignity  or  consanguinity,  who 
held  the  corners  of  the  pall  which 
was  spread  over  the  coffin  and  hung 
down  over  the  heads  of  the  under- 
bearers." 

"The  order  of  procession  to  the 
grave  was  a  matter  of  much  etiquette. 
High  respect  and  equally  deep  slights 
might  be  rendered  to  mourners  in  the 
place  assigned.  Judge  Sewall  often 
speaks  of  'leading  the  widow  in  a 
mourning  cloak.'  " 

"Throughout  New  England,  bills  for 
funeral  baked  meats  were  large  in 
items  of  rum,  cider,  whiskey,  lemons, 
sugar,  spice.  A  careful  and  above  all 
an  experienced  committee  was  ap- 
pointed to  superintend  the  mixing  of 
the  funeral  grog  or  punch  and  to  at- 
tend to  the  liberal  and  frequent  dis- 
pensing thereof." 

"One  great  expense  of  a  funeral 
was  the  gloves,  sent  as  an  approved 
and  elegant  form  of  invitation.  At 
the  funeral  of  the  wife  of  Gov.  Belcher 
in  1736.  over  one  thousand  pairs  of 
gloves  were  given  away.  Rings  were 
given  at  funerals,  especially  in  weal- 
thy families,  to  near  relatives  and  per- 
sons of  note  in  the  community.  Judge 
Sewall  records  in  his  Diary  in  the 
years  1687-1725,  the  receiving  of  no 
less  than  fifty-seven  mourning  rings." 

In  1741  the  Massachusetts  Provin- 
cial Government  finding  "the  giving 
of  scarves,  gloves,  wine,  rum  and 
rings  at  funerals  is  a  great  and  un- 
necessary expence,  and  while  practic- 
ed will  be  detrimental  to  the  Province 
and  tend  to  the  impoverishing  of  many 
families," — ordered  "that  no  scarves, 
gloves  (except  six  i>air  to  the  bearers,, 
and  one  pair  to  each  minister  of  the 
church  or  congregation  where  any 
deceased  person  belongs)  wine,  rum  or 
or  rings  shall  be  allowed  and  given 
at  any  funeral,  upon  the  penalty  of 
fifty  pounds  to  be  forfeited  by  the  ex- 
ecutor or  administrator  to  the  will  or 
estate  of  the  person  interred,  or  other 
person  that  regulates  or  is  at  the  ex- 
pence  of  the  funeral  (to  be  paid  by 
him  out  of  his  own  estate.)"  One  half 


ANCESTRAI^  LANDS  NEAR  BLUE  HILL— CliOSE  OF  LIFE 


of  this  fine  was  given  the  informer 
and  the  other  half  "for  the  use  of  the 
poor  where  the  person  interred  did 
last  belong." 

The  funeral  of  old  Parson  Thacher 
must  have  been  an  impressive  scene. 
All  the  inhabitants  of  the  town  and 
many  from  outside  the  limits  were 
probably  in  attendance  at  the  parson- 
age on  the  Plain.  It  was  December, 
the  time  of  year  when  nature  wears 
her  grimmest,  sternest  aspect;  leaf- 
less trees;  brown,  withered  grasses; 
even  the  pleasant  babble  of  the  near- 
by brook  frozen  to  silence;  and  in 
the  midst,  all  face  to  face  with  the 
mystery  of  death. 

Into  this  grey  setting  the  ruddy  Sax- 
on face  of  old  Judge  Sewall  in  his 
coach  and  four,  comes  as  a  welcome 
relief,  a  touch  of  warm  effective  col- 
oring in   a  sombre  picture. 

The  Thacher  family  held  the  estate 
many  years  after  Peter  Thacher's 
death.  In  1796  it  was  sold  to  Enoch 
Fenno,  a  potter.  He  carried  on  his 
business  in  a  building  that  stood 
where  the  Robson  house  now  stands. 
Long  afterwards  in  1834,  the  build- 
ing which  had  been  converted  into  a 
dwelling  house  was  burned.  The 
fate  of  the  old  parsonage  is  unknown; 
it  disappeared  more  than  a  century 
ago.  The  time  came  between  1834 
and  1846  when  the  entire  Vose  es- 
tate on  "Providence  Plaine"  was  with- 
out a  human  habitation. 

Dr.  Teele  said  in  1895:  "It  is  pro- 
posed, if  possible  to  secure  the  land 
embracing  the  old  cellar  and  with 
proper  boundaries  and  inscriptions, 
pass  it  down  to  posterity  as  a  sacred 
spot  ever  to  be  remembered." 

This  has  now  been  done.  Moved 
by  true  sentiment  for  the  past,  Mr. 
John  A.  Tucker  has  bought  the  lots 
covering  the  site  of  Peter  Thacher's 
home  and  thus  rescued  the  spot  from 
the  obliteration  that  threatened.  The 
elm  growing  from  the  cellar  bears 
this  inscription  cemented  into  a  cav- 
ity in  the  trunk  of  the  tree.  "Peter 
Thacher,  His  Journal,  1684.  Dec.  5, 
Bbed  began  to  dig  clay  to  make 
bricks;"  and  below  this:  "Peter 
Thacher,  His  Home  1689-1727."  Ebed 
was  Parson  Thacher's   slave.       Some 


of   the  original   bricks    are   preserved 
in  the  tree  trunk. 

Of  Thomas  Vose's  land  at  Brush 
Hill,  the  forty  acres  of  upland  and 
one  half  of  the  two  separate  lots  of 
common  land,  probably  extended  on 
Brush  Hill  Road  to  Paul's  bridge,  and 
included  the  lot  on  which  Henry  Vose 
settled  when  he  went  from  Providence 
Plain  to  Brush  Hill.  The  forty  acres 
of  Blue  Hill  meadow  were  a  part  of 
the  "Fowl  Meadows." 

The  50th  lot  was  a  tract  of  fifty- 
acres  and  embraced  what  is  now  the 
Eustis  estate,  including  both  sides  of 
the  present  Canton  Avenue. 

Thomas,  son  of  Robert  Vose  was  a 
man  of  note  in  his  day.  "For  many 
years  he  was  town  recorder,  and  un- 
der his  management  the  town  records 
assumed  a  systematic  and  business- 
like form." 

Among  the  earliest  records  relating 
to  schools  we  find:  "March  4th,  1669, 
Thomas  Vose  was  chosen  scoole  mas- 
ter for  the  East  end  of  the  town  to 
teach  children  and  youth  to  write 
he  eccepting  the  same."  "The  school 
was  at  the  head  of  Vose's  now  Church- 
ill's Lane.  There  is  good  evidence 
that  it  was  kept  in  the  old  meeting- 
house, doubtless  used  for  both  pur- 
poses." The  old  town  Records  bear 
testimony  to  the  beauty  of  his  pen- 
manship. For  seventeen  years  he  serv- 
ed as  town  clerk;  eighteen  years  as 
selectman;  ten  years  as  Representa- 
tive to  the  General  Court  and  was  ap- 
pointed on  the  church  and  town  com- 
mittees of  his  day.  He  was  lieuten- 
ant under  Capt.  Wadsworth  in  King 
Phillip's  war;  he  was  commissioned 
Captain  in  the  war  against  the  In- 
dians; and  was  appointed  one  of  the 
Captains  in  the  expedition  to  Can- 
ada. 

Thomas  Vose  died  in  1708.  His  de- 
scendants settled  on  the  ancestral 
lands  at  Brush  Hill,  and  on  Canton 
Avenue  near  Atherton  Street.  "The 
old  Vose  house,"  so  called,  on  Brush 
Hill,  stood  on  the  south  side  of  Brush 
Hill  Road  nearly  opposite  the  Elijah 
Tucker  house.  Capt.  Thomas  Vose, 
great  grandson  of  Robert,  lived  in  a 
house  that  stood  on  Canton  Avenue 
near    the    corner   of   Atherton    Street. 


ROBERT    VOSE    AND    HIS    TIMES 


In  this  house  was  born  Daniel  Vose, 
who  built  the  Suffolk  Resolves  house 
near  the  landing  at  Milton  Lower 
Mills;  it  was  afterwards  removed  to 
its  present  location  and  enlarged. 
The  landing  was  included  in  the  deed 
cf  conveyance  of  Ann  Glover  to 
Robert  Vose. 

Robert's  youngest  daughter,  Mar- 
tha, married  first,  John  Sharp  of 
?*Inddy  River  (later  Brookline).  He 
was  a  lieutenant  under  Capt.  Samuel 
Wadsworth.  of  Milton  and  with  him 
lost  his  life  in  the  Indian  ambuscade 
in  Sudbury,  whither  they  had  gone  to 
succor  the  imperilled  inhabitants. 
She  was  left  with  children  and  later 
married  Jabez  Buckminster,  whom 
she  also  outlived. 

After  disposing  of  his  real  estate 
there  remained  to  Robert  Vose  only 
his  personal  property  to^  be  distrib- 
uted. His  will,  written  on  the  10th  of 
September,   1683,   is    as   follows: 

"In  the  name  of  God  Amen,  the  last 
Will  and  Testament  of  Robert  Vose 
oi  Milton  in  the  County  of  Suffolke 
in  the  Massachusetts  Colony  in  New 
England,  Yeoman,  having  my  ordi- 
nary reason  and  understanding  and 
memory  blessed  bee  the  Lord  for  the 
same:  And  whereas  I  have  already 
setled  and  disposed  my  Housing  and 
Lands  and  stock  of  cattle  unto  my 
two  Sons  Edward  Vose  and  Thomas 
Vose  as  by  deeds  under  my  hand  and 
scale  may  appeare.  And  also  have 
made  provision  for  the  paying  of  my 
debts  and  for  my  own  maintenance 
and  funeral  charges  after  my  decease 
by  my  son  Edward  Vose  under  his 
hand  and  seale  bearing  date  the  twen- 
tieth day  of  February,  1682,  do  now 
make  this  my  last  Will  and  Testa- 
ment. And  first  of  all  I  renounce,  re- 
ject and  make  void  all  former  wills 
and  Testaments  by  me  made.  Item,  I 
give  unto  my  loveing  daughter  Mar- 
tha Buckminster  my  Bed  and  Bed- 
steed  with  all  the  Clothing  and  Furni- 
ture belonging  to  it,  after  my  decease, 
with  my  trunke  and  small  chest  in  my 
bed  chamber:  Item,  My  will  is  that 
all  my  Books  bee  equally  divided 
amongst  my  three  children  Edward 
Vose,  Thomas  and  Martha.  Item,  My 
will  is  that  all  my  househoild     goods 


shal  bee  my  son  Edward's  after  my 
decease.  Item,  My  will  is  that  what 
I  do  hereby  give  my  daughter  Martha 
shal  bee  bestowed  on  her  children  if 
shee  do  not  spend  them  herselfe  for 
her  own  maintenance;  Item,  I  do  ap- 
point my  two  sons  Edward  Vose  and 
Thomas  Vose  to  bee  my  Execut'rs  of 
this  my  last  Will  and  Testam't.  In 
Witness  whereof  I  have  hereunto  Set 
My  hand  and  Seale  this  10th  day  of 
September,  1683. 

ROBERT   VOSE. 

Signed  and  sealed  in  presence  of 
Rob't  Badcock,  Walter  Morey." 

On  the  11th  day  of  the  following 
month  he  died,  aged  84  years.  His 
wife,  Jane,  died  jn  Milton,  1675. 

"Robert  Vose  lived  here  through  a 
long  life,  respected  and  honored  by 
his  fellow-citizens,  and  came  to  his 
grave  'in  a  full  age  like  as  a  shock 
of  corn  Cometh  in  in  his  season."  "' 
It  is  to  be  regretted  that  no  stone 
marks  his  resting  place  In 
the  old  Vose  lot  in  Milton  cemetery. 

With  commendable  civic  pride  Mil- 
ton has  perpetuated  the  names  of 
several  of  her  early  settlers  in  her 
public  school  buildings.  The  Vose 
school  house  with  its  broad  outlook 
over  the  wide  territory  of  Robert 
Vose's  homestead,  furnishes  a  fitting 
memorial  to  one  of  the  founders  of 
the  town  and  his  numerous  worthy 
descendants.    ■ 

Books  Consulted: 

Shaw,  W.  A.,  Editor,  Plundered  Min- 
ister:s  Accounts:  Halley,  Robt.,  Lan- 
cashire, its  Puritanism  and  Noncon- 
formity: Publications  of  Historic  Soc. 
of  Lancashire  and  Cheshire;  Tucker, 
J.  A..  First  Four  Meeting  Houses  of 
Milton,  Mass.;  Dorchester  Town  Rec- 
ords; Milton  Town  Records:  Teele,  A. 
K.,  History  of  Milton:  Lechford.  Plain 
Dealing;  Sewa<ll,  S.,  Diary;  Judd,  His- 
tory of  Hadley;  Ellis,  G.  E.,  Puritan 
Age  in  Mass.;  Earle,  Alice  Morse. 
The  Sabbath  in  Puritan  New  Eng- 
land; Customs  and  Fashions  in  old 
New  England;  Colonial  Laws;  Suffolk 
County  Deeds;  Probate  Records  Suf- 
folk County;  Probate  Records  Norfolk 
County. 


THE  VOSE  SCHOOLHOUSE. 


PO 


18