io ec |
cate
ih
if is
a M ft
Di.
x Hl
uy
,
lie
<>
iu
} a .
a ia jee |
1 tn
| + oe ii
a id ; A — i “
ay
‘!
= MRR alt
+S i au of
a vei i"
. ual Si, I Hk Hs ‘ “HUI, uM me
f Mot lat ne) 0 j hi
+ a cual ai “ine " ee im
1 oN | fs a ea Ae Oe 3 bi i,
i a a
SIEU> AND -ENSILAGE.
THE PRESERVATION
OF
Fodder Corn and Other Green Fodder Crops,
Comprising the Most Recent Information.
NEW AND ENLARGED EDITION.
EDITED BY
DR. GEORGE THURBER,
OF THE AMERICAN AGRICULTURIST.
ILLUSTRATED
I
i
ell
Vy ga
1 =
\y
“ly malin
2 Jin
\
NEW YORK:
QO. JUDD CO., DAVID W. JUDD, Pres’,
751 BROADWAY.
1886.
a
_ Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1886, by the
Pe Tanta 3.
oe ver ye
Ayal Vie. ort
eh
Sank ‘
Ais aa 2 es
2 qe 3 i.
, Dares
ai ee
» ks i
r 4, i;
: prt
st he 3 «
Pt . "Fag
i Fi
¢ bony
* . a yn
a is
.
}
>
‘
-
m ~~
“6
z ,
,
*
«
™
‘
0. JUDD CU,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washingt
=D Ly be
7
e ;
i Af,
: xi vie
Geer ages
=
4 pe
YP
CONTENTS.
Page
PRR MNRTRENEED TS ath NL ene te oe Stk 7
Hew is-the Fodder Preserved, ..... .2225----_.-2.- 2% 9
CHAPTER I.
The Progress of Ensilage-- ---- Sg Opa) Sy eek ea ee iH
CHAPTER II.
iain Vodder Corn: for Minsilare). =. 222 222. su. -- se = - 13
CHAPTER ITI,
Location of and Building the Silo_._-_....--.-- SE ye ae eae 15
eee itr GG pte 2 SE ge i 19
CHAPTER IV.
Cutting and Storing the Fodder -....-..-.-...--£--.---1-. 20
The Proper Size to Cut Fodder_-__..--....-.-------. 20
Sapna ae RS oe Se ea Oe, .. See oe 21
POE Ns Sis) 2 pe RA ieee i ae ten 22
Peter eR eee Sc ee ROR ee Ree ee 22
CHAPTER V.
Gonerore js =. 0 oS ap ate AR eee Mee |S” See 23
RUGS CATE ANs ROCANECRE $988 52RD Sh ge ANG ek ha OE 26
CHAPTER VI.
European Experiments in Ensilage __._........._..______- 27
CHAPTER VII.
Messrs. Buckley’s Experience in Ensilage____. ______-.-_.- 36
CHAPTER VIII.
pe eemmom Beurrelle Silos. J... ek. 41
(3)
4 CONTENTS.
i CHAPTER IX.
Engilave in Hungary 22+ 22 2220-2 ec 2+ ee ae 44
CHAPTER X.
The Ensilage of Brewers’ Grains- --_---.--.--------------- 51
| CHAPTER XI.
The Ensilage of Other Crops than Corn -.---.....-------- 54
CHAPTER XII.
The Nutritive Value of Ensilave._...2 2222-12 2222 sa2e 60
CHAPTER XIII.
may Above Ground. Silo: 12.523 2 ee a eae ee 66
CHAPTER XIV.
*‘ Sour-Fodder”—Primitive Ensilage_-_.-_----....-...------ 69
CHAPTER XV.
Husilare gn Germany. 2 >< 225 oe ee ee ee eee 73
CHAPTER XVI
Sweet, ‘Mnedlace-: 228-22 ee ds sees Bose Cee e eee 77
CHAPTER XVII. .
Experience with Finsilage._.- 2-5). 228i oe ae 80
CHAPTER XVIII.
Supplementary Notes on Ensilage--_-.---..--.-----------_- 85
Increasing the Capacity of a Silo_.___._-__.________- 85
Bncilage for Poultry so 2 ee eee 86
The Chemistry of: Mnsilagesoo2250 52+ ee oe 86
The Character of the Manture25". 22 5 5 eee 88
The Ensilace ‘Conpress=. ot St ee 8&8
Crimson or Scarlet Clover__-.--..- 2. 2222.28 eee ‘89
To. Build a Cheap Suess See: ee er ee ee 89
‘The ‘Temperature: in the Silo. "39 s225.40 eee, ee 90
Nomenclature. 2. 8 seo peas we eo se 90
PREFACE TO THE NEW AND ENLARGED
EDITION.
When this work was first published the preservation of
green fodder in the silo was new to the majority of Ameri-
can farmers. Since then this method has passed beyond
its doubtful stage, and the question at present is not
so much as to whether it is practicable and profitable to
preserve fodder as ensilage, as how to build the best and
most economical silos, and the proper treatment of their
contents. ‘The object of the first edition was to present
in a compact form the essential facts concerning silos and
ensilage ; a new edition being called for, such additions
have been made as the progress of the method required,
and the work is thus materially enlarged as well as es-
sentially improved.
Though the agricultural world is indebted to M. Gof-
fart, of France, for first demonstrating the practicability
of preserving fodder in the silo upon a large scale, others,
especially in this country, have done much to simplify
and improve the method. Here, where the principal
fodder-crop, maize, attains its greatest perfection, this
method of preserving it should prove of the greatest value
to our agriculture. Already American ingenuity has pro-
duced machines and appliances for facilitating the labor
incidental to the method, and the construction of the silo
has been greatly simplified. American scientists have
increased our knowledge of the chemistry of the silo, and
investigations still in progress promise to enable us to
control the changes which occur within the silo more
effectively than heretofore.
New York, June, 1886.
(5)
PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION.
The method of preserving green crops, especially those
of fodder corn, by means of Ensilage, is one that the
wide-awake farmer of the present day can not afford to
ignore. The experiments already made in this country
show that this method of preserving green crops must,
it may be in an Americanized form, be adopted as a part
of our system of agriculture. The farmer who looks for
information on this subject finds it scattered through
the various agricultural journals, or in works which are
ostensibly upon Ensilage, but often largely devoted to
advertising other matters.
To bring together the facts concerning Ensilage that
are really important to the farmer, scattered through the
journals and elsewhere, and to present them in a com-
pact form, divested of all irrelevant matter, is the object
of the present work, which claims only to be a com-
pilation. In the earlier chapters the leading points are
presented, and these are illustrated by such accounts of
individual experience as seem most appropriate.
In a compilation like the present, any omission to
give credit must be regarded as accidental rather than
intentional.
That this little work may be of aid to those seeking
information on the subject of Ensilage is the wish of
THE EDITOR.
(6)
INTRODUCTION.
Within a very few years the term ‘‘ Ensilage” has ap-
peared in our agricultural journals, meaning the preserv-
ing of green fodder by placing it in Silos. In an intro-
duction to a work on Silos and Ensilage, it is well to
define the meaning of these terms. European writers
all give the word ‘‘Silo” as derived from the Spanish.
It means any underground place for preserving grain,
roots, or other farm products. In American usage the
term ‘‘ Ensilage”’ means the preservation of green fodder,
especially corn fodder in Silos. The term of M. Goffart,
‘<Ensilage de Mais,” has been abbreviated in this country
to Hnsilage, and is supposed to apply solely to fodder
corn thus preserved, unless modified, by naming some other
crop, as ensilage of rye, etc.
In England the terms ‘‘ Pitting” and the ‘‘ Potting”
of fodder are sometimes used, to mean the same as
ensilage. —
Ensilage is used, not only to indicate the process of
preserving fodder, but also as a noun, and applied by our
writers to the fodder that is thus preserved.
The process of ensilage consists in packing green corn
fodder, or any other succulent fodder, in close pits or
receptacles, called Silos. It is essential that the silos be
perfectly air-tight. They may be built in either of the
methods indicated in this work. They may be entirely
above the ground, partly below the surface, or altogether
underground, in the form of a well or pit; the impor-
tant point being to have a thoroughly air-tight receptacle.
This method, which has come into prominence through
the experiments of M. Goffart, of Burtin, France, has
(7)
8 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
long been in use in other countries and for other materi-
als. Sometwenty years ago the ‘American Agriculturist -
gave an account of a method of preserving clover in Ger-
many. In October, 1873, that journal published an ac-
count, by a Hungarian correspondent, of the method of
storing fodder corn in pits as practised in Hungary.
In August, 1874, was an account, from the same corre-
spondent, of the method of storing beets, and other roots,
cut and mixed with chaff, as followed in Hungary.
In April, 1875, pages 139-40, there was described and
illustrated ‘“‘A Dairy Barn” in Westchester County,
N. Y., in which was a pit for the storage of brewers’
grains. Several thousand bushels of grains were here
kept in good condition for months, simply by excluding
the air.
About this time the preservation of green fodder
attracted much attention in Belgium and France, and
several articles, by farmers and professors in agricultural
schools, appeared in the ‘‘Journal d’Agriculture Pra-
tique,” Paris, the leading agricultural journal of France,
giving methods and reporting general success. The im-
portant portions of these articles were presented in a
condensed form in the ‘‘American Agriculturist” for
June, 1875, pages 222-223, with six illustrations showing
simple pits and extensive receptacles for the fodder,
built above ground, with the method of filling, ete.
In September, 1877, pages 335-336, was described
‘An American Silo.” This gave two illustrations of
the pit attached to the Westchester County, N. Y.,
barn, described in April, 1875, with hints as to the
utilization of such pits for the storing of corn fodder.
In 1877, M. Auguste Goffart, an eminent French agri-
culturist, published at Paris a work on ‘‘ Ensilage.”
This was translated by J. B. Brown, of New York, and
published in 1879. Besides Goffart’s original work, this
has an appendix giving several other articles and notes
INTRODUCTION. , 9
by that author and several of his countrymen, the expe-
rience of Francis Morris, of Maryland, extracts from the
«‘ American Agriculturist,” besides a note giving ‘* Con-
clusions of the Translator,” in which he says: ‘‘The
first notice of this matter in this country seems to have
been made in the ‘American Agriculturist’ of June,
1875.” As shown above, Mr. Brown was not exactly
right as to the date, though quite correct as to the fact.
Prof. M. Miles, then of the Illinois Industrial Uni-
versity, in 1875 experimented in the preservation of
broom-corn seed. He stored it in pits, just as turnips or
other roots are stored, putting on a layer of straw, and
covering this with some eight to twelve inches of earth.
Pits put up in September were opened the following
March, and were found in satisfactory condition ; where
the covering was only eight inches deep, the outer portion
was dry and moulded, forming a compact crust a few
inches thick, but the interior was fresh and bright, while
a covering of twelve inches of earth preserved it better.
A sample of this ensilaged seed, sent to us at the time,
was perfectly sweet, and had much the odor of brewers’
grains. What may be the feeding value of these imma-
ture seeds of Broom Corn is not determined ; cattle ate
them readily, and there would appear to be no difficulty
in keeping them perfectly well, should it be desirable.
HOW IS THE FODDER PRESERVED ?
It is well known that a mass of green fodder, if loosely
stacked up, will soon ferment, heat, and pass into decay.
In the silo, the fodder is closely packed, and in an air-
tight receptacle, and these conditions, instead of encour-
aging decay, prevent it, and favor the preservation of the
mass. Several chapters have been written on ‘‘'The
Chemistry of the Silo,” but to understand them requires
10 * SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
a familiarity with chemistry: not possessed by the axe Tae
farmer and general reader.
Every farmer knows that manure, another form of
vegetable matter, if allowed free access of air, will fer-
ment, heat, and decay. He also knows that manure, if
kept under cattle or sheep, and daily trodden down
through the winter, will come out in the spring quite
unchanged. These are familiar illustrations of the well-
known fact that the presence of air is necessary to decay,
and that the complete exclusion of air tends to the pres-
ervation of perishable substances.
In the fodder corn we have a mass of succulent stems
and foliage in which preparation has been made for the
production of grain. These are filled with juices hold-
ing in solution the material that would soon be deposited
in the grain as starch, etc., but now largely in the form
of sugar. When the corn plant is cut and packed in
the silo, fermentation, the first step in decay, at once
begins. By th: action of the oxygen of the air on the
sugar and other contents of the stalks, etc., various
changes take place, one of which is to produce Carbonic
Acid. This acid is a gas, in which a candle cannot burn
or any animal live, and in which no further fermentation
can occur. If the silo is air-tight, the very first steps in
the fermentation of its contents produce a gas that acts
as a preservative and prevents further change. The
more compact the fodder corn, the less air will there be
among it, and the sooner will the fermentation step.
The fermentation not only acts upon and changes the
composition of the air within the silo, but the fodder
itself is acted upon and changed.
Sugar, when present in the juices of the corn, is at
first converted into alcohol ; and if fermentation contin-
ues far enough, acetic acid, or vinegar, will be formed
from the alcohol thus produced.
If the silo is properly air-tight, and its contents cut
THE PROGRESS OF ENSILAGE. 11
fine and well packed and carefully covered, there cannot
be sufficient air present to allow fermentation to go on to
an injurious extent.
The fact that injury may occur to the contents of the
silo from undue exposure to the air, should be kept in
mind at every step in filling the silo and in feeding its
contents.
CTL AP ERE By 33,
THE PROGRESS OF ENSILAGE.
Since this work first appeared, ensilage has passed the
experimental stage, and has been adopted by so many
farmers that it may be considered as an established
method among many who devote themselves to dairy-
ing. The number of silos in the United States in 1880
is said to have been only six, while it is estimated
that there are now about two thousand. In England
there were in 1880 only four silos, while now, Mr. M. J.
Sutton, in his recent admirable work on ‘‘ Permanent
and Temporary Pastures,” estimates that there are be-
tween eleven and twelve hundred. In England, the silo
will come into competition with ordinary hay-making,
allowing the farmer to secure his crops of grass and
clover in very wet seasons more promptly and safely than
he could as hay. In this country, on the other hand,
ensilage will be mainly directed to the preservation of
fodder corn, a crop of admitted value, but one which is
on all liands regarded as very difficult to cure. In the
Southern States, the silo will allow the farmer to pre-
serve one of his most important crops, the Southern Cow-
pea. This, which is regarded as most valuable as hay,
12 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
is difficult to cure, as the large leaves are shaken off in
the process, but packed in the silo, they would yield
most valuable cattle food, probably equal in value to
ensiloed clover.
An important contribution to the literature of the silo
is the report of ‘‘ Experiments on Ensilage, conducted at
Rothamsted, season 1884-5, by Sir J. B. Lawes, LL. D.,
F, R. 8., and J. H. Gilbert, LL. D., F. R. 8.” Rotham-
sted as an experimental station has a world-wide reputa-
tion, and the names of Lawes and Gilbert attached to
any statement impart perfect confidence in its accurracy.
Possessing ample means, their experiments are conducted
on a scale large enough to be regarded as practical, and
having no other object than-to arrive at the real facts of
the case, their conclusions are accepted as final. It
would be well if some of those who in this country think
they are making ‘‘ experiments,” but are only guessing,
could observe the accuracy and precision with which
everything is weighed and measured at Rothamsted. This
careful summing up of the experiments on ensilage will
not be likely to please the enthusiastic advocates of that
method. ‘Their conclusions from their experiments are
presented in twenty-two numbered paragraphs, the last
four of which are as follows :
‘*19.—There can be no doubt that good food may be
preserved in a favorable state for future use by being
properly ensilaged. But the results obtained at Rotham-
sted do not favor the idea that produce which is itself
not good food, can be made good food by being ensilaged.
“*20.—Good ensilage, given in such amount as to sup-
ply the same quantity of dry substances as would be
given in chaff or roots, is no doubt a very good food for
fattening oxen.
“¢21.—Good ensilage, given in less proportion and in
conjunction with roots, with the ordinary dry foods in
addition, is no doubt a very good food for milking cows.
RAISING FODDER CORN FOR ENSILAGE. 13
¢¢92.-_Tn conclusion, 1t is hoped that the details which
have been given of the first year’s experiments on en-
silage at Rothamsted will afford some useful basis for the
consideration of those who may be deliberating whether
or not to adopt the system.”
CHAPTER Ii.
RAISING FODDER CORN FOR ENSILAGE.
To one about to undertake the preservation of fodder
corn by ensilage, the important points are: growing the
crop, building the silo, cutting and storing the fodder,
and the methods of feeding. All preparation in the way
of raising the crop must have been done some months
earlier than the date of the publication of this work ;
still, for the sake of completeness, we give a brief
chapter on raising the crop.
If, as now seems probable, the method of ensilage shall
be generally adopted and incorporated in our system of
agriculture, we shall soon be supplied with such imple-
ments as will facilitate all the work relating to it.
The readiness with which inventors and manufacturers
have met the demand for cutting implements, is an indi-
cation of what may be expected in other steps of the pro-
cess, so soon as the needs are made known. ‘Thus far,
the experiments in cultivation and harvesting have been
made with the implements and machines already in use
on the farm. Not only may we look for new facilities in
the mechanical appliances, but for improvements in the
material, the kinds of corn best suited to the purpose.
14 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
One about to experiment with ensilage is met at the
outset by the question, ‘‘ What kind of corn shall I sow ?”
Here European experience is of no value as a guide, as
the varieties recommended there are not known here, and
we no doubt already have kinds of corn better suited to
the purpose than any known in Europe.
In the majority of the experiments in this country,
thus far, the variety sown has been the Southern White,
or ‘‘ Horse-tooth” Corn. A recent variety, ‘‘ Blunt’s
Prolific,” has been highly commended, and a special kind
called ‘‘ Mammoth Ensilage Corn” is advertised.
The greatest possible weight to the acre of quickly-
grown and succulent herbage is required. When the
plant has completed its growth, and commences to pre-
pare for a crop of seed, it then becomes woody ; the nu-
tritive material in the stalk and leaves is diverted to the
grain, and there deposited in a different form.
The production of varieties best suited for ensilage
will no doubt soon follow, if we have not already such.
In January, 1881, the ‘‘ American Agriculturist ” figured
and described the ‘‘ Cuzco,” or ‘‘ Peruvian Corn,” which,
by its rapid and gigantic growth before showing either
tassel or ear, suggests that it may be useful in establishing
a variety of maize for ensilage, either through acclimation
by selection, or by crossing it upon other kinds of corn.
The cultivation of fodder corn for ensilage is not dif-
ferent from that where the crop is to be cured in the
usual manner. The land being thoroughly prepared and
highly manured, is laid out in rows, twenty to thirty-six
inches apart, and the corn dropped four to eight kernels
to the running foot, the distances depending upon the
size of the variety. The subsequent culture is the same
as usual. Several mention the great utility of the Thomas
Smoothing Harrow in keeping the crop clean until it is
eight to twelve inches high, or too tall for this treat-
ment. Some have raised satisfactory crops without the
LOCATION OF AND BUILDING THE SILO. Lb
use of any other implement or tillage than that given by
this harrow, the corn soon smothering the weeds.
The precise condition in which the fodder should be
harvested is not generally mentioned by those who have
given accounts of their operations, the date being usually
stated instead. Some say that they cut up. the fodder
when ‘‘in tassel,” and others when the ears were ‘‘ partly
formed.” We should naturally expect to find the plant
itself the most nutritious just at flowering time, that is,
when it has ‘‘silked”; how far beyond this it may stand
with advantage, experiments are needed to determine.
In cutting up the corn, the sickle or corn knife is
generally preferred to a reaper, though we may expect in
due time to find these hand implements superseded by
more rapid machines, especially devised for the work.
CHAPTER III.
LOCATION OF AND BUILDING THE SILO.
lf one were to lay out a plan for buildings with reference
to feeding ensilage, he would make the silos the central
point around which all the rest would be arranged. But
our farms are already planned, the barns already built,
hence the silos must come in and forma part of an estab-
lished order of things. The silo is to preserve fodder
which is to be fed at the barn, hence its location must be
with reference to the most convenient feeding of its con-
tents. If, as is often the case, the barn has been built
near a bank, then this bank may be utilized for the silo,
placing this with reference to the feeding floor. The large
silos of Whitman & Burrell, at Little Falls, N. Y., were
16 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
so built that the roof of the barn could be extended to
cover the silos. In some cases it may be most convenient
to build the silo within the barn, or, where a basement
has been made for the reception of manure, it may be
better to convert the basement into silos, and dispose of
the manure elsewhere.
So long as our experimenters are not yet agreed as to
the best form of the silo, some holding that a deep and
narrow one, in the form of a pit or well, is better than a
long and shallow one upon the surface, the proper loca-
tion is difficult to determine. The essential points to
be observed in building a silo are given in the following
pages, and a consideration of these may help in determin-
ing the location.
It must be borne in mind that the silo is to be filled
and to be emptied. The filling is accomplished in a few
days, while the emptying, by feeding out its contents,
may extend through several months. Hence convenience
in feeding the contents must, other things being equal,
largely determine the location of the silo,
BUILDING A SILO.
It is unfortunate that the first accounts of ensilage
were by those who were not obliged to regard expense,
but, having abundant means, could construct such silos
as seemed to be required. We may add here, that much
is yet to be done in ‘‘ Americanizing ” the whole matter,
and we have no doubt that the experiments now being
made will greatly simplify, not only the building of the
silo, but every other step in the method. The wealthy
dairy man or other proprietor may make an investment
of a few thousands, if he sees that it will give a good
return in the feeding of his hundred or more cows,
while the farmer with five cows, who all the more needs
the benefits that this new method may bring, can not, as
LOCATION OF AND BUILDING THE SILO. 7
a general thing, afford the outlay of a few hundreds of
dollars. Before going into the particulars of building, it
may be well to consider what a silo is expected te do,
whatever may be the plan. In speaking of ensilage, we
now have reference to the preservation of fodder corn by
the method though, as will be seen, other farm crops
and products may be preserved in a similar manner.
The fodder corn, cut small, is packed in a receptacle
which is perfectly tight, so that it will not allow water to
enter from without, or gases to escape from within.
Could a glass jar be made of sufficient size it would be a
perfect silo. Large capacity, with perfectly air-tight and
water-tight walls, being the objects in view, the structure
will vary according to the locality and surroundings. In
some places a silo can be most cheaply built of stone ; in
other places brick will be found the most available mate-
rial. In other localities still, concrete will be cheaper
than either stone or brick, and just as good. These,
stone, brick, and concrete, are all well understood build-
ing materials, and where one has the means to allow him
to avail himself of them, are no doubt the best. But
those who can not command either of these should not
be deprived of the benefits of ensilage. There are several
accounts of successful preservation of fodder corn in silos
excavated in a bank of heavy clay soil, in which the
fodder corn was packed directly against the earthern
walls. We do not recommend this method, as there are
many chances of failure. There are many localities
where the soil is of such a character that cisterns for
rain-water are built by making an excavation of proper
size and shape, and covering its interior with one or more
coats of cement mortar directly upon its earthern walls.
Wherever cisterns of this kind may be built, a silo may be
made in a similar manner.
Another modification is possible in wooded countries,
where log-barns and even log-houses are still built. A
18 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
silo may be laid up of logs as for a log-house, and by
taking special pains with the ‘‘chinking up,” with clay,
both inside and out, an air-tight and temporarily useful
silo may be constructed.
Silos have been built by partitioning off a space within
the barn, using two thicknesses of boards, and placing a
layer of tarred sheathing paper between the boards. It
is not likely that a silo with wooden walls can last a great
while, as a large mass of fermenting material in direct
contact with the boards will soon cause them to decay.
Another kind of silo is possible in lumber districts,
where slabs are cheap. A frame may be made with slabs
set up about a foot apart, to build a hollow wall, which
is to be filled in with stiff, clayey soil, to be put in grad-
ually and rammed down hard. By either of these, and
other make-shifts, which are, of course, only offered as
suggestions, those who can do no better may secure the
benefits of ensilage, as well as those who can erect more
permanent and more costly silos.
A detached silo must be provided with a roof. In
some cases it may be so placed that the roof of the barn
can be continued to extend over the silo, and thus mate-
rially lessen the cost of building.
In building a silo, whether of brick, stone, concrete, or
other material, drainage is not to be forgotten, for to be
successful the silo must be not only air-tight but water-
tight. In building with brick or stone, the services of a
mason will usually be required. If the silo is of con-
crete, there is nothing in its structure that can not be
managed by a person of ordinary tact and ingenuity.
Probably the larger number of silos built in this country
will be of concrete, and, in view of the importance of
the subject, we give a separate chapter on building con-
crete walls.
LOCATION OF AND BUILDING THE SILO. 19
THE SIZE OF THE SILO
Of course will be determined by the number of animals.
The description of Whitman & Burrell’s, and other large
silos will give some idea of the larger structures. It is
estimated that one cow requires for a year five hundred
and fifty cubic feet of ensilaged fodder, and if the cows
are pastured for half the year, then two hundred and
seventy-five cubic feet will be sufficient. Mr. Bailey es-
timates that to keep two cows for a year, a silo ten feet
wide, long and deep will hold sufficient. <A silo twelve
feet wide, thirty feet long, and twelve feet deep, he esti-
mates will hold about eighty-seven tons, enough to win-
ter twelve to fifteen cows. Where stone is plenty, he
thinks that a silo of this size can be built at a cost, be-
sides the labor, of about fifty dollars. Silos have been
made by digging a pit, putting in the fodder as in pitting
roots, piling it as high as practicable, and then covering
with earth. The difficulty in this case is, that in open-
ing, the earth mixes with the fodder; besides there is a
trouble in keeping the covering tight as the contents set-
tle ; this method might answer where straw is plenty, and
a sufficient covering of that can be placed over the fodder
before putting on the earth.
20 SILOS AND ENSILAGE,
CHAPTER IV.
CUTTING AND STORING THE FODDER.
While some have succeeded in preserving the fodder
corn in pits without first cutting, it 1s generally conceded
that it should be cut before storing. Already several ma-
chines, to be driven by horse or steam-power, have been
invented and are manufactured expressly for the purpose
of cutting fodder corn for ensilage.
THE PROPER SIZE TO CUT THE FODDER.
The fodder has been cut by different experimenters in
pieces varying from one inch down to one-fourth of an
inch, the majority regarding three-eighths of an inch as
the most desirable size. One object in cutting fine is to
insure the most compact storage possible and consequent
exclusion of air. The packing away should follow im-
mediately upon the cutting, in order that the juices of the
plant may not evaporate and be replaced by air. For the
same reason, there should be the least possible delay
between the field and the machine that is to cut it for
the silo. As Dr. Bailey properly suggests, ‘‘ tearing or
shredding the stalks would be much better than cutting,”
and leads us to hope that a machine for this purpose may
be forthcoming in due time. But at present the corn
must be cut, and for this there is no lack of suitable
appliances.
That the size of the pieces is of importance in other
respects than as regards the preservation of the fodder,
is shown by a case that recently came to our knowledge.
A friend informed us that one of his neighbors, who had
succeeded admirably in preserving the fodder, found that
CUTTING AND STORING THE FODDER. - 21
after his cows had fed upon it for a while with evident
relish, they all at once seemed reluctant to eat it. An
- examination showed that the gums of the cows were
badly cut and inflamed to such a degree that they were
unable to chew the fudder. This trouble was found to
be due to the fact that in the act of chewing, the short
pieces of fodder would generally be bitten endwise, and
the outer portions of the corn, which at the base of the
stalk might get very hard, being presented endwise to the
teeth, were so sharp as to lacerate the gums and the tender
parts of the mouth. This gentleman proposed to over-
come the difficulty by cutting the fodder longer; if the
pieces were longer than broad, the animal would take
hold of them in the usual way and bite against the cir-
cumference of the stalks rather than against the ends.
It is not probable that a difficulty of this kind could occur
unless the base of the stalks had become too hard and
firm for feeding in any form, and as many have fed the
short-cut fodder without any trouble of this kind, it is
@ warning against letting the fodder get too old, rather
than a caution not to cut it too fine.
FILLING THE SILO.
Experimenters generally agree that about two feet in
depth daily is better than a more rapid‘: filling of the silo
with the cut fodder. The form of the silo will govern
the rapidity of filling somewhat: if narrow and deep, it
may be necessary to fill in a greater depth daily.
The importance of thoroughly compacting the fodder
is strongly enforced by all who have had any experience.
The fodder should be spread evenly, mixing leaves and
stalks as thoroughly as possible, and as the work proceeds
be trodden down very closely and firmly. Where the silo
is of a size to allow it, horses or mules have been intro-
duced to do the trampling. The usual custom is to keep
22 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
one or two men in the silo to tramp down the fodder as
fast as it comes from the cutter. If during the night the
surface of the fodder in the silo has dried appreciably, it
should, upon resuming the filling the next day, be wetted
sufficiently to restore the original moisture; this may be
most conveniently done by the use of garden watering pots.
COVERING THE SILO.
When the silo is filled, six or eight inches of straw are
laid over the top of the fodder, and upon this a covering
of two-inch plank, cut so short that they cannot bind
against the walls, as the contents settle. The plank cover
is then heavily weighted with whatever material may be
most available. Where large stones are at hand, these may
be used ; logs will answer ; boxes filled with gravel or with
earth, and even bags of grain have been used. Much of
the success of the process depends upon having sufficient
pressure. The weighting material must be of a kind that
will allow of its removal in part without disturbing the
rest.
SALT AND STRAW.
In the early experiments, salt was scattered among the
fodder, but this is now abandoned, as it is not necessary
to the preservation of the contents of the silo.
In some cases cut straw has been mixed with the fod-
der in filling the silo, some claiming that it is useful in
absorbing superabundant moisture. On grain farms,
where straw is abundant, it would be desirable to use a
portion of it in this manner, but experiments are needed
to show to what extent such a mixture may be made
without injury to the corn fodder, by preventing that
from being sufficiently compacted. One writer claims
that the feeding value of straw thus mixed with fodder
corn in the silo is greatly increased. This is one of the
CONCRETE SILOS. 23
unsettled points in ensilage, and one worthy of careful
investigation.
In some instances, where the quantity of fodder corn
was not sufficient to fill the silo, hay, especially rowen,
has keen used to complete the fillmg. This was put in
as soon as cut, and when the silo was opened was found
to be in most excellent condition.
CHAPTER V.
CONCRETE SILOS
One of the best methods of laying concrete is by means
of planks to form the mold to hold the mortar, the
planks being held in place by posts set at the angles of
the wall, and at other points if necessary, and by clamps,
both the planks and the clamps being held in place by
wedges, all of which is shown in the accompanying en-
gravings. Figure 1 represents the planks in position,
and the posts set, held together at their tops by strips
nailed upon them, while at the ground they should be
held in position by stakes and braces. Figure 2 is a
diagram showing a section or ground plan of the same
things; a, b, in both figure 1 and figure 2, are iron
clamps holding the middle of the planks in position in
case they are likely to spread apart. Figure 3 is a rep-
resentation of the walls while in process of erection.
Planks, planed on the side towards the walls, are pro-
vided sufficient for the entire circuit of the building, and
when in position the space between them is filled with
the mortar. When the mortar sets, which, with a pro-
portion of cement it will do very soon, then the planks
24 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
are raised and fixed in position by driving wedges between
the posts and the wall, as shown in figures 4 and 5, in
which a, a, are the wedges; 0, 0, the planks ; ¢, a clamp
<5
is Ss
(Fi
‘ill
I
Fig. 1.—THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE POSTS,
holding the planks together, and wedged on one side, and
d, d, the posts. The posts will usually need to be braced
well to prevent their springing when the wedges are
driven tight enough to support the planks.
Figure 4 shows a section of the wall and one post with
Fig. 2.—ARRANGEMENT OF THE PLANKS.
the wedges, as looked down upon, and figure 5 is a per-
pendicular cross-section of the same, the letters refer to
CONCRETE SILOS. 25
the same parts in both engravings. The door frames are
introduced in their places and held by braces until the
- walls rise around them.
MATERIALS UsEp.—It is best, unless indeed some
one in the neighborhood has had experience, to test be-
forehand the proportions of sand, gravel, and lime, or
ain ss i. es
Fig. 3.—METHOD OF LAYING THE CONCRETE.
cement, which are best suited to the proposed work.
There is so much difference in the various kinds of lime
that proportions can only be given approximately.
Roughly the pwoportions may be stated as one part lime
to seven parts of other materials, half of which should be
clean washed sand. When sufficient materials are accu-
mulated upon the mixing board, they are first mixed dry
by repeated shoveling, then the lime, slaked to a creamy
consistency, is added, and well mixed through the whole,
adding more water if necessary. The addition of one-
fourth cement, the lime being reduced to three-fourths
of one part, and the cement being added after the mortar
9 }
26 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
is mixed, makes a much quicker setting and harder con-
crete. When all cement and no lime is used, but a‘small
quantity can be mixed at a time, for it sets so quickly
that it could not be placed in position before it became
solid. ‘The proportions for a smooth, solid concrete are:
one part Portland cement to five parts sharp sand. If
aS
©.
S
0% {
wi
>
”
Q
—
Q,
—
= eis
99
+]
Sy
=p*
sO}
a
99
‘o
Yo%ac Ow
Sess
Sun
9.0
2
“tons
vo
tf foseass |
eee “Bee
Figs. 4 and 5.—RAISING THE PLANKS,
mixed rather liquid, one-third or more, often nearly or
quite two-thirds, of the wall as completed, may consist
of gravel and coarse broken stones, put in while the
cement is being placed in the molds forming the walls.
WHITMAN & BURRELL ON CONCRETE SILOS.
These gentlemen, in their paper on silos, given else-
where, append the following directions for construct-
ing a silo of concrete: First, having excavated for the
silo, dig a trench all around the bottom and fill in
with cobble stones, and from one corner lead a drain,
if possible, so as to carry off all water. The trench
under the proposed walls of the silo being filled with
CONCRETE SILOS. 22
cobble stones, place standards of scantling long enough
to extend twelve inches higher than the top of the wall
when it is finished. Place these standards on each side
of the proposed wall, and if you desire the wall to be
twenty inches thick, then place the standards twenty-
three inches apart, and place a pair of standards every —
five or six feet around the entire foundation. Be par-
ticular to have these standards exactly plumb and exactly
in line. Fasten the bottoms of the standards firmly in
the ground, or by nailing a strip of wood across at the
bottom of the standards, and a little below where the
floor of the silo will be. Fasten the tops of the stand-
ards by a heavy cross-piece, securely nailed, and fasten
the pairs of standards in their plumb position by shores
reaching the bank outside. Now take plank, one and a
half inch thick and fourteen inches wide, and place them
edgeways inside the standards, twenty inches apart, thus
forming a box fourteen inches deep, and running all
along and around the entire foundation of the proposed
wall. Fill this box with alternate layers of cobble stone,
or any rough stone, etc., and mortar or concrete. First,
a layer of concrete mortar, and then a layer of stone,
not allowing the stones to come quite out to the boxing
plank, but having concrete over the edges, and the con-
crete must be tamped down solid. Prepare the concrete
as follows: Take one part of good cement, Portland is
the best probably, and mix with this four parts of sand,
and mix the cement thoroughly with the sand while dry,
and then mix four parts of clear gravel; make into a
thin mortar, and use at once. Put into the box an inch
or two of this mortar, and then bed in cobble stones ;
then fill in with mortar, again covering the stones, and
again put in a layer of stone. When the box is filled
and the mortar ‘‘set,” so that the wall is firm, then raise
the box one foot, leaving two inches lap of plank on the
wall below, and go around again, raising the wall one foot
28 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
each day every second day, according to amount of labor
at hand. If one-half the bulk of fine-slaked quick-
lime is added to the water-lime, it will improve it, and
costs but little. If Rosendale or Akron cement is used,
instead of Portland, then the proportions should be as
follows: One barrel of good live cement, three barrels of
good sand, three barrels of good clean gravel. If no
gravel is obtainable, then use five barrels of sand to one
of cement, and bed im all the cobble stones possible.
Stone with rough edges are better than smooth, as they
bind the wall more thoroughly, but any flat stones found
about fields will do as well. <A layer of loose cobble
stones should be placed against the outside of the wall
before the earth is brought against it, so as to have an
air space and a free passage for water.
CHAPTER VI.
EUROPEAN EXPERIMENTS IN. ENSILAGE.
The ‘‘ American Agriculturist ” for June, 1875, gave,
so far as we are aware, the first full account of the EKuro-
pean methods of ensilage; the article is here reproduced
as a part of the history of the subject, and as giving the
methods followed in Europe at that time. . . . The
recent experiments in France and Germany in the pres-
ervation and feeding of fodder of various kinds are of
great value to our farmers. ‘Their object is to economize
the use of cattle food. In almost every department of
industry it is the savings in labor and material that are
cheapening the cost of production, and at the same time
increasing the profits of the producers. In every opera-
EUROPEAN EXPERIMENTS IN ENSILAGE. 29
tion in agriculture there is a vast scope for saving in both
labor and materials. Our method of feeding stock is very
wasteful ; the greater part of the fodder fed every winter
is expended in merely keeping the cattle alive. A loss of
weight or condition im all kinds of stock equal to from
ten to sixty per cent is suffered every winter. There is
no necessity for this; stock may be kept increasing in
weight during the winter, if the fodder is of the right
kind and the stock is properly housed and protected.
The feeding of poor, unpalatable fodder is the chief
cause of this loss. ‘The appetite needs to be stimulated
at the season when the greatest draft is made upon the
physical condition of the ani-
mal; and to meet this need
there must not only be palata-
ble or enticing food, but there
must be plenty of it. Corn
fodder is largely depended upon
as food for stock over a great
extent of country, and its use
might be well nigh universal,
as no forage plant is so easily —=
grown as corn. Could it be pre- Fig. 6. PIT BEFORE COVERING.
served fresh and green for six months or more, instead of
curing it and using it dry, its value would be greatly in-
creased. That it may be so preserved has been shown by
experiment, and the process is claimed to be easy and
very profitable. Of late years a great number of French,
Belgian, and German farmers have adopted the plan, and
some extensive stock-feeders have used it largely, with
the most favorable results. Several communications by
prominent farmers and professors of agriculture in farm
schools have been made to the ‘‘ Journal of Practical
Agriculture,” of Paris, from which the following facts
have been condensed, and, by the aid of the illustrations,
the methods in use may be learned. In figures 6, 7, and
30 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
8 are.shown the pits, or silos, as they are filled with the
cut corn fodder, then covered with earth and pressed
down with its weight, and finally as the cut fodder has
shrunk through fermentation to less than half its ori-
ginal bulk. These pits are about seventy-five feet long,
nine feet wide above, six feet wide at the bottom, and
six feet deep. The sides and ends are built up of masonry
laid in cement. In these pits the corn-stalks are laid
evenly with care in layers of about eight inches thick,
after having been cut and exposed to the sun for two or
three days. During this time the stalks lose, by expos-
YS
NY =
Fig. 7.—PIT AFTER COVERING. Fig. 8.—PIT AFTER SIX MONTHS.
ure to the sun, two-fifths of their weight when first cut.
A quantity of salt is scattered over every layer equal to
about sixty-six pounds for each pit. [N. B. It should
be borne in mind that this is an account of the early
experiments ; the previous drying and the use of salt are
now abandoned. Late experience has shown that the
more succulent the fodder, the better it will keep.—Ep. |
The three pits hold about eighty tons, or seventy-five
thousand kilos, of green fodder. The fodder is heaped
up, as shown in figure 6, to a hight of six feet above the
surface of the ground, and then covered with earth to a
thickness of two or three feet. On the 14th of Septem-
ber, 1872, this work was finished. On the 15th of April
EUROPEAN EXPERIMENTS IN ENSILAGE. 31
following, one pit was opened, and the fodder was found
in perfect condition, except for an inch or two upon the
surface and the sides, where it was black and decayed.
Its color was yellow, its odor agreeable, but the stalks
Ale
ti
fia:
‘ANNOUD AAOMV Lid JO MAIA ANA—'G ‘ST
had lost all their sweetness, and had acquired some de-
gree of acidity. Twenty-four beeves were then fed about
nine hundred pounds daily of the preserved fodder, or
nearly forty pounds per head on the average, which was
an SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
equal to about sixty pounds of fresh green fodder, The
fodder was eaten with great relish, and only some ‘por-
tions of the harder stalks were left. The second pit was
consumed July 3d, having been preserved equally well
with the first. The third was not opened until the 20th
of April, 1874, eighteen months after covering. The
fodder was in as good order as that from the other pits,
excepting that the discolored and decayed layer was
somewhat thicker in this pit than in the others ; a result
attributed in a great degree to the gravelly and porous
character of the covering earth, the preservation being
due solely to the exclusion of air. In this instance the
fodder was preserved whole, and the cost of cutting
avoided. But when the fodder has to be cut for final
use, it has been found an economy to cut it before it is
stored. ‘This system has been adopted by M. Piret, the
manager of a large estate owned by M. A. Houette, at
Bleneau, in Belgium. From his statement we find that
he made a small experiment in 1868 which was perfectly
successful, the cut fodder being withdrawn from the pit
in 1869 in excellent condition. In 1870 two pits of
masonry were erected above ground, protected at the
sides only by banks of earth. They were found equally
serviceable with those sunk below the surface, and much
more convenient. Following the statement of this gen-
tleman closely, we learn that by the aid of about four
hundred and fifty pounds of superphosphate of lime per
acre, he has obtained, on fairly good soil, seventy-five
tons per acre of green fodder, although the average of
his crop was not more than forty-five tons per acre ; two
hundred and fifty tons of this was cut by a fodder cutter
driven by horse-power, cutting two tons per hour, and
stored in the pits as follows. The pit was built as shown
in figure 9, which represents the section, a dividing
wall in the center separating it into two parts. The cut
fodder, falling into the pit, was carried in baskets upon
EUROPEAN EXPERIMENTS IN ENSILAGE. 33
a truck on a portable railway to the end of the pit, where
it was packed away in sections formed by a movable par-
Mv
Y
Yi
YZ
y
ae:
02
a ed
S
_
o
Bi
= et
an!
Bi
=
°
y
ry
_
=
by
Bs
Lam
A
2
yj
ome
S
oH
cd
9
Saint Me :
about two pounds to the ton of fodder being added. This
pit is seen in figure 10, which represents it in a longitu-
dinal section, and in figure 11, which shows it in plan,
34 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
and in-which one division is seen filled, and the other in
course of fillmg. When the pits are filled, the fodder ig
covered with a layer of fine clay, nine inches thick, well
i 4 AVG i f
Cd shit : ‘Ii YYZ
Liye Vy AY “y y
F, 4, A “ff, (4 4 “yf /, f, YY a,
“ Yi, YU. Wiis 4 y y i,
NA AALOT, A YG, MILLE! “7 WG Fey DIUM ELT SL “
Fig. 11.—@rounp PLAN OF PIT.
eh
: ! i
Yj
i
i
Peddie
S \ iil |
i
!
ul}
t
'
:
All :
beaten down. In these figures the parts are shown by
the following letters: B, is the fodder cutter ; C, the
rail track ; D, the exterior walis ; £, the division wall ;
f, the filled compartment; G, that in course of filling ;
7]
i
Yj
S =
: Hl
|
it
i
| | !
I :
IN y bi aidialS
IN AAR UTA URB AR SUT NSS
Was
EUROPEAN EXPERIMENTS IN ENSILAGE. 35
H, the movable partition with a transverse bar, P, which
holds it in position ; J, the truck. The pit is shown in
figure 9, as covered with a roof of boards as protection
from the weather, a measure of economy strongly recom-
mended by M. Piret. In this figure the covering of clay
is shown on the top of the fodder. This is beaten down
frequently, as it may become cracked or disturbed by the
settlement of the mass beneath.
The cost of the process here déscribed is represented
as being about three dollars per ton, including the cut-
ting, carrying, curing, and feeding of a crop equal to
nearly fifty tons per acre of green fodder, fifty thousand
kilos per hectare. This enormous yield appears almost
incredible to us, being a ton to less than four square
rods; still we can not doubt but such a yield is not only
frequent, but that it is sometimes surpassed. It goes to
show that in the cultivation and use of this, our most
common crop, we come far short of the possible yield,
notwithstanding our favorable climate and the necessity
of every available economy to cheapen or increase its
production.
36 ' SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
CHAPTER VIL
MESSRS. BUCKLEY’S EXPERIENCE IN ENSILAGE.
BY M. C. WELD, IN ‘‘ AMERICAN AGRICULTURIST.”
The good result which many persons obtained last year
in pitting corn fodder, leads this year to the making of
many pits, or silos, for this purpose, all over the country.
\
= — =
—— b
Fig. 12.—SECTIONAL VIEW OF STABLES AND FODBER PITS,
So that if there is the least question as to the utility of
this process for the preservation of corn fodder, it will
be soon set at rest by a thousand experimenters.
I was much interested in witnessing the filling of the
pits built by the Messrs. Buckley Brothers, of Port Jervis,
N. Y., whom I visited about the middle of September.
MESSRS. BUCKLEY’S EXPERIENCE IN ENSILAGE. 37
It has been their habit for many years to put in a large
area of sowed corn, which was cut and put up for curing
in stooks, and afterwards housed or stacked near the
barns. This year they have a larger area than usual, a
large part of which they put down in pits for winter
feeding. This matter of pitting or ensilaging corn
fodder has been carefully investigated by them, and they
have made, this year, two pits under the cow-barn floor.
These pits, figure 12, are twenty-two feet long, nine feet
wide, and fifteen and a half feet deep, side by side, with
a two-foot wall between them. They are walled all
XSAN
HAY. BAY : FEEDING FLOOR
cow STALLS
Fig. 13.—FLOOR PLAN OF BARN, CATTLE STABLES, ETC.
around, and cemented water-tight. They would answer
well as cisterns. These two are just built, but there is
an old one, ten feet wide, fifty feet long, and seven feet
deep, which is under the feeding floor. The location of
these pits is shown in the accompanying plan, figure 13.
The cow-barn is one hundred and twenty feet long, by
thirty feet wide. The feeding floor is ten feet wide, and
the standing space for the cows is the same width on
each side. There is room for thirty-six cows in this
stable, up to the barn floor. The floor, the stalls, and all,
from side to side, was taken up for the filling of the pits,
but was relaid.
, At the time I was there the work of filling was gomg
38 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
on in full blast. A pair of powerful mules were at work
in the horse-power. The feed-cutter stood directly be-
hind them, and cut the stalks in half-inch pieces, at the
rate of two tons an hour. It required three men to tend
the cutter, taking the corn from the wagon, feeding it to
the cutter, and seeing that it was properly shunted off
into the pits, where one man spread it as evenly as pos-
sible and trampled it down. At noon and evening half-
a-dozen men got into the tanks, and trampled the fodder
down as firmly as they could. One man and one team
were required to haul the fodder from the field. As soon
as a wagon load was brought into the barn, the team was
ungeared and hitched to the empty wagon. In the field,
the teamster assisted in the loading. There were three
men in the field cutting up the corn and loading the
wagon. ‘Thus the labor required was as follows: Two
_teams and one driver, four men in the barn, and three in
the field; eight men in all. With this force they were
putting in about twenty tons a day.
The stalks were rather dry; the juice did not squirt
out of them when they went through the cutter, and the
chaffings were not even moist to the touch. When
packed in the pits, a strong fermentation sets in very
soon. The corn that had been packed the day before
was steaming hot, no doubt having a temperature of one
hundred and ten to one hundred and twenty degrees
Fahrenheit. It had a vinous odor, which was very
sweet and pleasant. Mr. Charles Buckley gave us
the figures of the cost of these two pie which is as
follows :
Diese, 112 days work at) Pl. 262%. ies scan en oe cae $112.00
SRST PRIMES cs Ge PS Ea ccine, Gro Sw 'v Os ae olor ae RE 94.44
Men to assist the masons, twelve days work........ 12.00
Bill for lime Ad CAMS ibs s ss vas 0tac es ee bees eee 78.10
LObAL: OUTLAY so. nie wah vs» Bienes 6 a a ee Rw ety eee $296.54
This does not include anything for stone, for the stones
MESSRS. BUCKLEY’S EXPERIENCE IN ENSILAGE. 39
taken out of the pit were sufficient for the walls, and
more too. Neither is any charge made for superinten-
dence, and no doubt it would be fair to add fully ten per
cent for the supervision and actual labor, which at one
time or another the farmer himself gave, or say three
hundred and twenty-five dollars in all. There were
fifty barrels of cement used, and about half as much
lime, part of which, eight barrels, was very good, and
the rest, fifty bushels, cheap and of a low grade.
The proportion of sand to cement and lime in the
mortar with which the walls were laid up, was about
two-thirds, but in coating over the surface, to make the
whole water-tight, nearly pure cement was used. Thus
the pits were filled, each one receiving its quota of ten
tons, more or less, being well trodden down, allowed to
settle over night, and again trodden down in the morning
before work, all hands being engaged in the trampling.
When full as possible, settled and trampled, and begin-
ning to heat in the top layers, it is covered with six
inches of long rye straw, any other straw will answer,
and this, with a layer of planks, cut to fit crossways, but
not so long as to bind. Stones are piled, or rather laid,
upon the planks, so that fully one hundred pounds to the
square foot rests upon the fodder. Thus it is left for
winter use. Filled full, one of these pits will hold sixty
tons. ‘That is, containing as they do over three thou-
sand cubic feet, or two thousand four hundred bushels,
at fifty pounds to the bushel, which the compressed,
moist, and almost solid fodder will weigh ; this is equal
to one hundred and twenty thousand pounds, or sixty
tons.
As to the keeping, there can be no question, if the
work is properly done. A brisk fermentation comes on,
as we have seen, as it does in a tub of apple pulp for
making cider. If the air has very slight access it will go
on to ultimate decay ; but if it is kept out, the little air
40 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
at first present is driven off by the carbonic acid gas
which is formed, and the mass ceases to ferment, and re-
mains as if it were in an air-tight case. There is, how-
ever, a slight access of air upon the surface, and its action
upon the juices in the straw and upper layer of fodder is
just enough to maintain an atmosphere of carbonic gas
over the mass, and in the straw, which is like a rubber
blanket, confined as it is beneath the planks. The stable
will be replaced over the pits, and when the time comes
for feeding there will be no going out in storms and
*‘slush” and ice to haul in the fodder from out-of-door
pits, but the floor will be taken up over a sufficient space,
and enough feed removed from’ one end for two days,
when it will be packed down again and covered closely.
I think rubber blankets, tarpaulins, canvas, or any coarse
cloth painted with boiled oil, would be excellent to pack
close down upon the fodder to exclude the air. One
thing strikes me as very important, and that is, to know
for a certainty that there is no settling of carbonic acid
gas in the pit, after a considerable opening is made. A’
man going into a place filled with this gas, as often occurs
in deep wells, is overpowered before he knows it, falls, and
drowns as surely as if he were under water, and is even
less likely to be resuscitated. 'The way to know whether
a man can enter with safety, is to lower a lantern, which,
if it burns freely, shows that there is not a dangerous
proportion of gas in the air of the pit.
WHITMAN & BURRELL’S SILOS. 41
CHAPTER VIII.
WHITMAN & BURRELL’S SILOS.
Among the most enterprising experimenters with en-
silage are Messrs. Whitman & Burrell, dairymen at Little
Falls, N. Y. They have given very full accounts in
their local paper, the ‘‘ Little Falls Journal and Courier,”
from which we quote the essential portions of their article
describing their silos :
Our new barn and silo are located on a side-hill. The
barn is ninety-two feet long, thirty-six feet wide, and has
three floors: First, the cow stable in the basement, nine
feet high, two rows of stanchions, twenty feet space
between the rows. About three feet four inches back
from the stanchions is a wrought-iron grating, three feet
three inches wide, after the plan of Prof. E. W. Stewart,
upon which the hind feet of the cows stand. Under the
grating is a trench, three feet two inches wide, and
twenty-eight inches deep ; this is laid in cement, and is
water-tight. All droppings from the cows pass through
the grating, and the urine is all saved, as well as the solid
excrement. There is a drive-way, eight feet wide, be-
tween these gratings. Sections of the gratings are on
hinges, and can be turned up, and the manure from the
pit loaded on to the sleigh or wagon. The vault has to
be cleaned out once in three or four weeks. Cows are
kept perfectly clean and dry, and we think the arrange-
ment is a good thing.
On the floor above the cows, also nine feet high, and
the same size as the cow stable, is the granary and room
for storage of all agricultural tools, implements, and
machinery. ‘This floor also has entrances so that a team
can be driven in at one end and out at the other. The
42 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
floor above is the main barn floor, and entrance is from
the side-hill right into the center of the barn. The'silo
is on the hill-side next to the barn, thus:
DRIVE-WAY TO SILO. SILO.
e ss be ee Risto bie bleu eee Seas ee
Z 27x16x20 27x16x20
BaRNn, 92x36.
Peesereeeseeeseeesreeeepeeereseeeeeeeeseer ee eeeeeeeoesoeese &
The bottom of the silo is on a level with the cow-
stable floor, and there are entrances into the silo from
both the cow-stable and the floor above. The top of the
silo is on a level with the upper or main floor of the
barn, so that the fodder can be taken out on either of
the three floors of the barn. You will appreciate the
convenience of this arrangement. The silo is built of
stone ; the walls are three feet thick next to the bank,
and two feet thick next to the barn ; the roof of the barn
extends over the silo. All around the walls twelve inches
of cobble stone are filled in from top to bottom, so as to
prevent any water lodging against the walls. Capacity of
entire silo about four hundred tons, or two hundred tons
for each compartment.
On June 1st we put in about seven acres of corn, with
a drill, rows twenty-one inches apart, and dropping six
or eight kernels to a foot. In September we cut the same,
hauled to the silo as fast as we cut in the field, and with
a feed cutter of the largest size, or next to largest size, we
cut, at the rate of over one hundred loads per day, into
pieces three-sixteenths to one-quarter of an inch im
length, which was evenly distributed in the silos and
WHITMAN & BURRELL’S SILOS. 43
trodden down. . The corn was large, stalks twelve to
fourteen feet high, single ones weighing five to five and
a half pounds, with ears on full of milk. Into one silo
we put sixteen feet, and into the other eleven feet. As
soon as filled, one taking three days and the other four,
we put on the covers. These are of plank, three feet
wide, sixteen feet long, and two inches thick, fitting to-
gether closely ; and upon these covers we put fifty tons
of stone to each silo, the stone having been picked up on
the farm. Within a week one had settled to twelve and a
half feet and the other to eight and a half feet.
On the 26th of October we opened the silo having
eight and a half feet of ensilage, and found the fodder as
green and sweet as when first put in. We used no straw
under the covers, and yet right next to the boards the
corn was all right. We have fed the stock since October
26th, and they are all right, looking and feeding well.
One cubic foot of ensilage weighs forty-seven pounds.
We are feeding sixty-five pounds to each cow per day,
with four pounds of middlings and half a pound of oil-
meal, or cotton-seed meal. We had, before we began feed-
ing the ensilage out to the stock, two hundred and twelve
tons, and the exact cost of harvesting it, filling the silos,
putting on stone, etc., was two hundred and seventeen
dollars, allowing full wages for our own time, etc. We
are now going to feed fifty to fifty-five pounds to each
cow per day, and increase the grain to about six or seven
pounds for the cows still giving milk, and half as much
to the dry ones.
This two hundred and twelve tons from seven acres,
or a little over, is a large result, and is equal to seventy
odd tons of hay, costing but three dollars per ton, or ten
tons to the acre. We believe that by putting all the
manure back on the seven acres of land that we can get
up to forty and possibly fifty tons to the acre. We see
no reason now why the cows that are being fed on en-
44 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
silage will not continue to do well in condition and prod-
uct, and our plan now is to raise about fifteen acres of
corn next season, 1881, and this will be sufficient to fill
the silos full, giving us four hundred tons, and this will
keep forty cows three hundred and sixty-five days; but
as we shall pasture all of the side-hill during the summer
season, about twenty acres, the pasture will also grow
better, because the cows will drop more upon it than they
take from it. We think we can give the cows all they
will eat, morning and evening, of the ensilage, and keep
in this way fifty head the year round on fifteen acres of
corn and twenty acres of hill-side pasturage. We, how-
ever, immediately after taking off the corn early in Sep-
tember, plowed up the stubble and put in winter rye.
This came up finely, and we will top-dress it this winter,
and early in the spring give it a good bushing in. We
expect to cut the rye by June Ist or 5th, and cut that up
the same as we do the corn and store it in one of the
silos, then immediately plow the same seven acres and
put in corn; whether this will work remains to be seen.
But we have full confidence in the perpetual fertility of
this corn land, because it is to be replenished, not only
with what grew upon it, but from the grain fed with the
ensilage : for, by the plan we have adopted, the liquid
manure is as perfectly saved as the solid, and the most
accurate experiments show that the fertilizing matter of
the liquid is greater than in the solid manure. Prof.
Stewart reports that he has found the manure from one
cow, standing upon the self-cleaning platform, carried
fresh to the field, the liquid all absorbed by the soil,
equal to the manure from three cows saved in the old
way, by throwing into a pile and carrying it to the field
months afterward. In fact, there is no fertilizing matter
wasted or lost, except that carried off in the milk.
The beauty of the system is, that, instead of spreading
the manure from forty or fifty cows over two hundred
WHITMAN & BURRELL’S SILOS. 45
acres, we use it all on the fifteen acres that furnish the
fodder, and shortly the land must become very rich, and
then we can use the manure on other land. If we were
to build a silo on level land, we would excavate ten or
twelve feet below the surface, and then let the walls of
the silo run up ten feet, using the earth that was excay-
ated to make a bank about the walls above ground. We
would locate the silo close to the barn, making the top
of the silo on a level with the barn floor over the cows;
then, in feeding out the silo, the fodder could be easily
raised with any of the same appliances used for raising
and carrying hay, and with a track running to the
shutes, the car could be dumped so that the fodder would
be deposited in front of the stock. The walls of the silo
should be perfectly plumb and parallel, so that the fol-
lowers, although fitting closely, can settle without bind-
ing when loaded with stone. As you build the silo walls,
point up as you proceed, both inside and outside, and
then plaster the entire inside, bottom as well as sides,
with Portland cement, as it is necessary that the silo
should be water-tight, like a cistern. |
A cheaper way to build a silo, and one which Prof. E.
W. Stewart, of the ‘‘ Live Stock Journal,” cee is
to build it of water-lime concrete.
We think that stone walls two feet thick, plastered
with Portland cement, are better than concrete, and
where people can afford to build of stone they had better
doso. Inregard to the size of silos, we would make them
twenty feet deep, and put them as much below ground as
possible, if good drainage can be had, banking up around
the outside with the earth that is excavated, as before
stated. A silo thirty feet by sixteen feet, and twenty
feet deep, will be large enough to contain two hundred
tons of pressed ensilage, and this would keep thirty-five
cows six months, feeding about sixty pounds per day.
For one hundred cows, we would advise building a silo
46 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
one hundred feet long, dividing it into three compart-
ments by means of two cross walls, and then feed: out
one ata time. ‘This would provide an empty silo in the
spring, which would be ready for the winter rye, clover,
June grass, etc., Hungarian can’t be grown early, which
could be harvested early in June, cut up same as the
corn fodder, and stored in the silos for summer feeding.
Our ideas are, that it is best to give the stock a good
feed from the silos every morning and night during the
summer in addition to pasturage. Now, as to whether
people can afford to put in silos, etc., we can only say
that on our upland farm we had, at the beginning of win-
ter, two hundred tons of hay. If we had putin fifteen or
twenty acres of corn, and cut and stored it in the silos,
we would now have been able to have spared all of the
two hundred tons of hay, and, as the price is now
extreme, twenty dollars per ton, we would have received .
for it enough to have paid all expenses of building both
barn and silo, besides raising and harvesting the corn
fodder, and we should have had fully as much manure
to put back on the farm as we will have now in feeding the
hay. But even if hay was but eight dollars to ten dol-
lars per ton, it would pay to put in the corn crop for
ensilage, and build the silo to contain it. The stock
would be kept as well upon the ensilage as upon hay, and
give as much manure, and the hay, if it were soid at eight
dollars to ten dollars per ton, would pay all expenses the
first year. The right kind of corn for seed costs eighty-
five cents to one dollar per bushel, and we hope to get a
feed-cutter capable of cutting ten to twelve tons per
hour, or one hundred tons per day, for about one hundred
and fifty dollars, and not require over a two-horse tread
power to run it. Corn ensilage is probably not a perfect
food for cows in milk. Linseed meal, or cotton seed
meal, with bran or oat meal, will produce a good flow of
milk. Fifty-five or sixty pounds of ensilage food, with
-_
ENSILAGE IN HUNGARY. 4%
three pounds of linseed meal, and four pounds of bran,
will answer satisfactorily.
CHAPTER IX.
ENSILAGE IN HUNGARY.
The preservation of green fodder crops has long been
practised in several countries of the Continent of Europe,
by essentially the same process as that now termed ensi-
lage, but under the names of ‘‘ Sour Hay,” and ‘‘Sour
Keep.” In Germany, clover has long been preserved in
this manner, and especially have the leaves of the Sugar
Beet been kept in pits for winter feeding.
In October, 18738, the ‘* American Agriculturist” pub-
lished an article from its correspondent G. C., a farmer
in Hungary, entitled
“SOUR-FODDER MAKING,’’
the essential portions of which, with the engraving are
here given: ‘‘ Although the writer is not acquainted with
American farming except by reading of the ‘American
Agriculturist,’ nevertheless I communicate a method of
preservation of juicy fodder peculiarly important for
corn-producing America.
‘‘'The corn is sown broadcast, or drilled in rows nine
to eighteen inches apart, two metzens to one Austrian
joch, or about 3.3 hectolitre to one hectare. [This
is nearly three and a half bushels to the acre.—ED. ]
The cultivation remains the same ; the field must be kept
- free from weeds. At blossom time the corn is mown,
loaded into wagons, and hauled in. The home-brought
48 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
corn is put in large ditches, German Grube, Miethe, ten
or twenty rods long, and is here pressed in by a few men
walking on the green corn. The engraving, figure 14,
will explain the whole. The ditch is twelve feet deep,
twelve feet wide at the top, and six feet at the bottom.
The length will need to be sufficient to contain the fod-
der to be preserved. The ditch must be dug in dry
ground. When the ditch is filled, the green corn is built
like a stack upwards about ten feet over the level of the
Yl >
Mf
- : Less ———— = —o57V“7
Ss = = > =
SS Ss Ss
SSS SSS
SSS5 SS
SSS SSS
SSS SS
LSS [SS SSS SELES S—__
Fig. 14.—sEcTION OF HUNGARIAN DITCH.
ground, as shown in the engraving. ‘The finished stack
is then covered with earth about two feet thick on every
side. It is best to cover the top of the stack at first, be-
cause the weight of the earth pressing down the green
corn, so much earth is not needed for covering as is the
case when the sides are covered at first.
‘‘This sour-hay making enables us to store a large
quantity of juicy fodder for the winter, and if well
covered with earth it may be stored for a few years with-
out any injury. The most important of all is, the beasts
being once acquainted with this sour-hay, like it very
ENSILAGE IN HUNGARY. 49
much. With us, in Hungary, the sour-hay is cut and
mixed with corn meal, or some other ground grain, and
given to the cattle; but the sour-hay may be fed uncut
also.
‘< Tn sections where stones and bricks are to be obtained
cheaply, the sides of the ditch may be walled, but it is
not necessary.
‘‘T should be very glad if these lines would serve to
encourage the sour-hay making of corn by the American
farmers.” |
ENSILAGE OF ROOTS.
The following year the ‘‘ American Agriculturist,”
published, in August, 1874, another article from the same
Hungarian correspondent, in which he describes the
preservation of beets with chaff, giving this also the
name of ‘‘sour-fodder.” ‘‘ The chief necessity of every
dairy farm, or cheese and butter factory, is to feed a juicy
food to the cows at every season of the year; this is
easily provided for in the spring, summer, and autumn,
by feeding green rye, wheat, clover, a mixture of oats
and peas, corn, etc., but in the winter we have no other
milk-producing fodder than beets and corn sour-hay. It
is known to every farmer, how difficult is the preserving
of roots in the winter, and that large quantities of them
are injured and therefore spoil. To avoid this, we cure
the beets and other roots with chaff into sour-fodder.
This method of using root-fodder has been in use on
large farms in Hungary for some years, and has always
been successful. ‘The method of making this so-called
sour-fodder is as follows: at first we have a ditch made
in a dry place [the ditch may be of the dimensions already
given for corn fodder.—iip.] When the beets are taken
up in the usual manner they are hauled in, washed, and
cut with a machine. Then the pit may be divided into
3
50 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
sections, for instance, for a length of ten rods into five
sections, and by this division the labor is very much
facilitated, because the first section can be covered with
earth, while the second section is being filled. Whena
certain quantity of beets are cut, we place at first a layer
of chaff upon the ground of the first section, upon this
chaff is placed a layer of cut beets, in the proportion of
one pound of chaff to ten pounds of cut beets ; these two
layers are then solidly mixed with a fork; after having
done so, a layer of chaff and beets is again laid down,
and again well mixed. This is repeated until the mixture
reaches the top of the ditch ; then it must be built up-
Fig. 15.—PIT OF BEETS AND CHAFF,
ward from six to nine feet above the level of the ground.
On the top of the stack are laid a few sheaves of rye-
straw, to prevent the fodder being mixed with earth ;
then the first section is covered with earth, commencing
the covering at first on the top of the stack. When the
first section is finished, the second and all following sec-
tions are managed in the same manner, as above described;
when the whole ditch is filled, we take care that the stack
is covered on every side with one and a half to two feet
of earth. This sour-fodder, mixed with corn meal or
THE ENSILAGE OF BREWERS’ GRAINS. 51
other feed, will be relished by the daintiest beast. The
engraving, figure 15, shows the whole arrangement. The
first and second section of the ditch is filled, the first one
is also covered with earth.”
CHAPTER X.
THE ENSILAGE OF BREWERS’ GRAINS.
In an article published in the ‘‘American Agriculturist,”
there was given a description of a silo for the preserva-
tion of Brewers’ Grains. This was attached to a dairy
barn at Katonah, Westchester Co., N. Y., and had at
that time been in successful use for many years. The
silo in this case is square and deep, and attached to the
barn. The engraving, figure 16, shows the shape and
method of construction of the silo, and at figure 17, the
manner in which itis used. It will be seen that the only
difference between the operation of this and the French
silo, is, that the former has not so dense and compact a
covering as the latter. A very close covering is not so
essential with brewers’ grains, as with corn fodder, be-
cause they pack much closer and exclude the air better
than the looser corn stalks ; but when the latter are cut
up into chaff, and thoroughly well pressed down, a mere
covering of planks, nicely jointed upon the edges, would
be sufficient for the exclusion of the air from the mass
below. It is always preferable to cut the fodder into
pieces, not longer than one inch, for the reason that it
then packs more closely and the preservation is more com-
plete. The silo, shown in figure 16, consists of a sort of
basement cellar, with the door opening into the cow-
52 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
stable, and the rear sunk for the most part beneath the
ground ; a road passes to the end of it, where there is a
door, shown by dotted lines, for the purpose of receiving
the grains. The walls are of stone, and the floor is of
cement. The silo is covered with an ordinary shingle
roof. ‘The grains are packed in solidly, until they reach
the level of the door at the top, when they are covered
with boards, and some straw is thrown over the boards.
n
\
\\
|
Prasanna
\
Leseena=
=} py rt) |
Gy SSS
WYZ-ZZZZ_ZEEEZEZEZEZEZEZZ.
When the grains are required, the lower door is opened,
and the grains, as fresh as when put in, but somewhat
sour, are dug out for use. As the mass is cut away,
nothing is done to the surface which is left exposed to the
air ; but as the grains are very quickly used in this large
dairy, there is not time for them to be injured, and the
surface is.» made fresh every day by the removal of what
was left exposed the day before. The same method may
be applied to the preservation of corn fodder. As cut
THE ENSILAGE OF BREWERS’ GRAINS. 53
green fodder lies in a looser and more open mass than
grains, it would be necessary to have a cover as nearly im-
‘pervious to air as possible, for use when the silo is opened
and the preserved fodder is in course of consumption.
This may be easily done by means of wide planks, jointed
smoothly at the edges, which should be laid upon the
face of the mass of fodder as it is cut away. Pins may
be inserted in a few of these planks, upon which another
= = Ss Sy
Fig. 17.—MANNER OF COVERING.
plank may rest, and the whole cover may then be pressed
tightly against the fodder by means of a piece of timber
placed with one end against the wall, and the other end
resting upon the cross-plank, and thus made to act as a
wedge. ‘This is shown in figure 17; It will be necessary
to cut away the mass of fodder smoothly and regularly,
leaving an even surface for the planks to rest against.
54 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
CHAPTER XI.
THE ENSILAGE OF OTHER CROPS THAN CORN.
The experiments with ensilage have been, in this coun-
try, at least, so generally made with Indian corn, that,
in the popular mind, the term is understood to refer to
the preservation of that crop. Reference has already
been made to the preservation of other crops, and some
examples have been given, including one of the success-
ful preservation of Brewers’ grains for a series of years in
a receptacle that is essentially a silo.
In Germany and France, where large areas are devoted
to the cultivation of the Beet as a source of sugar, the
closest economy is observed in every step. Indeed, the
success of this culture depends largely upon the proper
expenditure of the beet-root pulp after the factory has
extracted the sugar, or all that it can profitably remove.
Frost greatly diminishes the yield of sugar; hence the
beets are topped and harvested before there is any danger
from this source. As a consequence, the leaves are in
excellent condition, being in nearly full growth. While
beet-leaves, and especially beet-pulp, contain a large
amount of earthy matter, salts of various kinds, that
unfit them as an exclusive food for animals, they are of
great value when properly mixed with feed of other
kinds, and their preservation is an important matter to
the farmer who cultivates the sugar-beet. The great
mass of beet-tops can not be fed out before it would
spoil, and ensilage comes in as an important aid in its
preservation. From the accounts given in European
works it appears that the beet leaves are merely packed
away in pits, and directly in contact with the earth.
The farmer who delivers his beets at the sugar factory
-_THE ENSILAGE OF OTHER CROPS THAN CORN. 55
bargains for the return of the pulp, and this valuable
cattle food has also been preserved with success by bury-
ing it in a similar manner.
The Beet-sugar industry :s making a slow, but heaithy
growth in this country, and the time is not far distant
when the preservation of the leaves and pulp by ensilage
will be of great importance.
Hungarian grass usually comes in to supplement a
short hay crop, and being sown late, it is cut late, and is
often in danger of being caught by frost before it can be
cut and cured. The few experiments that have been
made show that this grass may be preserved in silos, and
thus treated makes excellent fodder.
Mr. W. C. Strong, the well-known horticulturist of
Brighton, Mass., tried packing Hungarian grass in the
silo, just as it came from the field, without cutting. The
attempt resulted in failure, there being so much air in-
cluded in the mass that decay took place. In other
instances, where the grass was cut before storing, it kept
in a satisfactory manner, and made excellent ensilage.
Millet.—Under this name a variety of plants are cul-
tivated in this country, and there is much confusion in
the application of the term. The true Millet of Europe,
Panicum Miliecum, is rarely cultivated with us. It is
to this plant that the name, Millet, should be restricted,
and with all other grasses it should be used with a prefix.
The plant most generally cultivated in this country as
** Millet ” is one of the forms of Setaria Italica, (also WS.
Germanica, which is but another name for the same,)
and is a variety of the ‘‘ Hungarian grass.” The form
known as ‘‘ Hungarian grass” runs more to foliage,
while those varieties known as ‘‘ Giant,” ‘‘ Hungarian,”
‘* Bengal,” ‘‘ Golden,” and other kinds of Millet, have
larger panicles, and produce more largely of seed or grain
than the others.
For the purposes of ensilage, the variety known as
56 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
Hungarian grass would be better than any of the forms
called Millet, as they are likely to give a large supply of
herbage.
The name of Millet, with the prefix ‘‘ Pearl,” that is,
** Pearl Millet,” has, within a few years, been given to a
plant well known in Southern localities as ‘‘ Cat-tail
Millet,” from a resemblance of its dense heads to those of ~
the real ‘‘ Cat-tail,” Typha latifolia.
‘‘Pearl Millet” is properly Penicillaria spicata, and
belongs to a different genus from any other grass known
as Millet. The trials that have been made with it show
it to have value as a fodder plant. Like several other
grasses, which are large enough when well established,
this is very small at the start. When a stand is fairly
made, it grows on with great vigor, and allows several
cuttings to be made during the season, the number de-
pending upon the latitude. Asa plant for ensilage it is
worthy of the attention of southern farmers.
Sorghum, in its different kinds, is worthy cf considera-
tion as a plant for ensilage. Sorghum vulgare has deyel-
oped into several distinct races. Those forms which are
grown for an unusual development of the seed panicle
are known as Broom Corn. Other varieties have been
produced in which the saccharine matter of the stalks is
developed to its highest pomt, and are cultivated for
syrup and sugar. Other varieties still are cultivated for
their grain, which, under the name of Durra, etc., are
the principal bread food of some oriental peoples. Of
late, some of these grain-producing forms have been
offered as forage plants, and it is likely that some of these
may be found of value for ensilage. Indeed, all of these
kinds of Sorghum, with the exception of Broom Corn,
are likely to give ensilage of great value, and should re-
ceive attention in those localities where their culture is
found profitable for feeding green or curing dry.
Rye sown for a forage crop is of great value, especially
- THE ENSILAGE OF OTHER CROPS THAN CORN. 57
on a dairy farm. It has the disadvantage of maturing
rapidly, and all at once; so soon as the heads begin to
form, the stalk becomes hard and woody, especially at
the lower part, and loses its nutritious qualities.
Where ensilage is practised to a large extent, it is well,
as Messrs. Whitman & Burrell propose, to have a silo
empty by the time the rye is in its best condition for
fodder, at which time it may be cut and stored, thus
preserving this valuable crop in its greatest perfection.
Both Oats and Wheat, cultivated for fodder crops, have
been successfully converted into ensilage. We have not
heard of the use of Oats and Peas as an ensilage crop.
This mixture is a favorite fodder crop with many farm-
ers, and converting it into ensilage would allow it to
be secured for future feeding at just the time of its great-
est perfection, which is before the formation of the grain
and seeds has materially diminished the nutritious value
of the herbage in either.
Among the kinds of forage that have been preserved
in silos in Europe is the foliage of the Jerusalem Arti-
choke, Helianthus tuberosus. A variety of this, called
the “ Brazilian Artichoke,” is most generally cultivated,
though it is ‘‘ Brazilian” only in name. It differs from
the old and well-known form in having: shorter and
rounded tubers, which grow close around the base of the
plant, and these usually have a red skin. The variety
known as “ Brazilian” is regarded as vastly preferable to
the old form with long and scattered tubers.
This crop is coming into use in some parts of the
country, as affording a valuable food for swine. The
yield of tubers is often enormous, and as the harvesting
is done by the animals themselves it is cheaply raised.
The crop is, however, a very exhausting one, there being
few plants that take from the soil and deposit in their
herbage such a large amount of potash as does this.
Wherever the Artichoke is grown, the stalks and foliage
58 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
should be returned to the soil in some form. The French
convert them into ensilage. Cattle and other animals
are remarkably fond of the recent foliage, and it will be
worth while for those who cultivate the crop for the
tubers to experiment in the saving of the herbage in
silos, either by itself, or mixed with corn or some other
plant, that its valuable constituents may be returned
to the land in the manure.
In the agriculture of the Southern States the Cow Pea
largely takes the place occupied by clover on northern
farms, both as a crop to be plowed under for green ma-
nuring, and as food for domestic animals.
The crop is not one that is cured into hay without diffi-
culty, as the large stems and foliage are very succulent
and heavy, and lie so compactly that there is danger of
moulding and decay. When made, the cow-pea hay needs
to be handled with care, as the leaves readily break away,
and every time it is moved the finer portions of the hay
become scattered ; consequently caution is required in
feeding it, or the rations will be very unequal. ‘The por-
tions from the upper part of the mow will be little besides
bare stems, while that lower down will have more than
its proper share of the foliage. By preserving the cow-
pea in silos these difficulties would be avoided, and the
southern farmer will be thus enabled to provide his ani-
mals with this rich fodder in a vastly better condition than
is otherwise possible.
It is not necessary that the value of the cow pea, as an
ensilage crop, should be confined exclusively to the South-
ern States. Though it cannot be depended upon to ripen
its seeds in northern localities, it will, in the climate of
southern New York, yield an abundant crop of most
nutritious herbage. This plant is one which should re-
ceive the attention of those interested in ensilage. There
are some twenty or more named varieties of the cow pea
in cultivation in the Southern States, varying almost
*THE ENSILAGE OF OTHER CROPS THAN CORN. 59
as greatly in the size and color of the seeds as do the
garden beans. ‘The plants differ much in size and vigor,
as well as in their disposition to run, and seek some sup-
port upon which to chmb. Some, if provided with poles,
would climb to the hight of several feet, and these, in
field culture, twine about one another and form a dense
matted mass that prevents harvesting by the mowing
machine. Some varieties are preferred by southern
farmers for plowing under, others are considered best for
hay, and still other kinds for the production of 1ipened
peas.
The ‘‘ Johnson Grass,” also in some localities called
‘Guinea Grass,” and ‘‘ Means Grass,” is a tall perennial
species, Sorghum Halepense, with thick tuberous roots,
that is of late being planted extensively in the Southern
and some of the Middle States. It allows of several cut-
tings during the season, and is highly esteemed by those
who cultivate it, both for feeding green and for hay.
This is another plant that promises to have its value
greatly increased by being preserved in silos.
Buckwheat is one of the crops that has been suggested
as proper for ensilage, though we have no definite accounts
of its employment in this manner. It has the merit of
giving a fair crop upon poor land. The straw, after the
grain has been removed, is not regarded as especially val-
uable, and indeed, when fed to swine or used as bedding
for them, is apt to cause an eruption upon or irritation of
the skin. If stored in the silo, this should be done before
the grain has formed, just at flowering time, in order
that the herbage may be in the most nutritious condition.
Prickly Comfrey, Symphytum asperrimum, a plant that
has been rather slow in finding a place in our agriculture,
is in Kurope commended as one useful for ensilage, espe-
cially to mix with fodder corn in the silo. We have seen
no definite accounts of experiments with this plant in
the form of ensilage. In some localities in Virginia, and
60 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
on some dairy farms in New England, it has been cul-
tivated to some extent. The chief merit claimed for it
is its abilty to furnish green fodder very early in spring
and late in the fall, and we enumerate it as one of those
plants that may possibly be of value in the silo.
CHAPTER XII.
THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF ENSILAGE.
BY J. M. MCBRYDE, PROFESSOR OF AGRICULTURE, ETC., UNIVERSITY OF
TENNESSEE,
The success of Ensilage appears to be fairly established
by experiments in many different localities, and is there-
fore no longer an open question. Concerning the nutri-
tive value of the new food, however, the views are many
and conflicting. We have enthusiastic farmers, on the
one hand, declaring that ensilage is almost equal, pound
for pound, to hay, that it is sufficient by, and of, itself
not only to sustain life, but to fatten, that it can hardly
be improved upon; and, on the other hand, scientists
assert that its value is to be estimated by its percentage
of dry matter alone. The first refer you to the results of
experiments where estimated amounts of this and other
stuffs were roughly fed to different farm animals of
various weights and ages; the second to the results of
recent analyses, showing that it contains eighty per cent
and upwards of water. The last affirm: ‘‘ Average
ensilage contains eighty-two and a half pounds of water
and seventeen and a half pounds of dry substance in one
hundred, and a ton of it, skillfully fed, will make twenty
pounds live weight of beef, which, at five and a half
THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF ENSILAGE, 61
cents, would be one dollar and ten cents. The manure
might bring it up to one dollar and fifty cents per ton,
feeding value. In view of the above showing, the claim
that ensilage is a nutritious feeding stuff is simply pre-
posterous.” Now any one who will take the trouble to
make the necessary calculations from the data furnished
by No. 14, in Series 2d of the subjoined experiments,
will find that one thousand two hundred and twenty-
three pounds of ensilage made twenty-seven pounds of
beef, live weight, or about forty-three and three-quarter
pounds to the ton. In other words, the estimated amount
is wide of the mark by upwards of one hundred per cent.
Again, the results of all the following experiments go to
show that ensilage is not of itself a perfect food, and that
its nutritive value is greatly increased by the addition of
other matters.
I do not propose, however, to discuss in detail the ex-
periments of the several Series, my space is too limited
for this, but simply to ask that all those interested in the
subject will examine them, candidly and fairly, for them-
selves. I have said enough, I hope, to show the import-
ance of experiments carefully and accurately made, with-
out previous bias or prejudice. As such these are
offered, for no expense or labor was spared to make them
thorough and reliable. They are herewith submitted in
full and without reserve, along with the fewest possible
words explanatory of their history and bearing. It must
be premised that every pound of food was carefully
weighed, the animals were confined in separate stalls,
and were as nearly as possible alike in age, blood, and
general condition, except in Section II of Series 1st, de-
signed simply to test the life-sustaining power of ensi-
lage, and in Series 3d, establishing its forcing qualities
when properly combined with other foods.
In Sections II and III, Series 1st, the results of the
experiments are not as unfavorable to ensilage as they at
SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
62
F0I— Oi 9°8 2 6 9°6 i wclaldlovs « eisis,a 06 bale alesis we c ¢ sa'sielsu.eictela, & sss ransog $ ‘Kassap § 61
0°03 QT 9°6 26 0°38 nee A ec Sadek tere ee ‘uIOU MOUS £ a}
6 §— c‘0— aad LOL 8°21 eee e teres ee ee ee seers sees s seeeeeseeeene qniog ¢ oslo F oT
*IUUsnjo “avsnpa *aQsnyo
¥ ur ‘g fi,qaq|-u2 ‘6g Ave -w ‘6, “une
*9U20 ad §}s "sq] U2 IST|02 0 Awep|o2 0g fi. ‘upr'o? OL “une
ynn pasvd\ynn pasvd|uf hop dad| mous ft Dp .l, ad woifhvp sad *J[BO TILAI SYJUOU W9AVS OF} VAY MOIS SAVOHM
-W09 SD PO|-Wwod sD po|\y72IUL fO Sq) [O|4WQUWL SO Sq) fo YIVUL £0 Sq? [O :
nines pug U2|-2.49q Dug w|oar abvwaay |" AT 0B 1.4907 |*OAT aDAIAPY
wb 40 sso'T|ujnb 10 ssor'y|—pomag pus|—P024ad PUS —POWaT 4ST
‘ILA 88 SUOIJRL PUB SMOOD OUIBS ‘UWON0N POUT YW “TILA.
i €8"0— O1— (69 00% srosee sess sss TeIg-yBoq AA Booed T “oseysuy —y - 6L
ag | 0S" 0— ae | 208 088 ' _ aeIq-ivoyM Hood J ‘ostpisug spunod Fe », 45 BE
LI- ee O— olI— OFS 0cg ee ee .. Shas sieaiaesteunn quoi ¢ “sais wiles LE
“SMLOOD TOLL ‘UDLT pup PODIWUA “ILA r
8G 99°0 LT L09 06S sees’ "[BoOL W109-990l MA 3) ” ” fed Or
TOL 91'S | g9 COL 0F9 wer eee es [BOUL Poss-WO}o) ” 35 ” IL
@ OL erg OL 0S! 089 Tree Gse aces GOL TLIO spunod +4 ‘9Se' isug spunod if 8
‘sayy quasaf{:p pun aboy sug "TA,
9°¢ &8'T OP Crh COL soe ee sess" [B9Ul P90S-U0}}0D ws ED a » O86]
LG 99'T 0g GI6 C98 Oe [seul U10D Ss $9 “ < 0% g
Gh 00°% 09 098 O0R CE epee era To *" [Ba] U100-90I1y spunod f£) ‘Avy spunod 0g] %
‘spayy Qualafiip pun hoy “A
9°9 00°T 0g O8F OSP eee eoree » 06°38-380 4, 0@| SI
oh €e°1 OP Cbg ecg 38 or ey fesunw OR. t. «+ OL] ef
6°§ 990 06 Cag cog [vour W109 spunod ¥) ‘avis-1e9Q spunod 0g ‘Avy spunod gt} 24
“SploUzUingy |” Ut Yorl spoog pun ‘holo Ald yn abnsUuH * AT
€°0 99°0 G LEG GUC atten ot IRs a 5 a ooepsuy spunod 0g ‘MBIS-}VQ 0G! =F
8°9— €e" I- Or— OPE 08g ee ee ecee sewer *DOVl[ISUA spunod ‘itd nf es Ol I
ard $9'0 0% 0th 001 : an ae "**-BIqs-380O spunod 9g ‘Avy epunod QI] 9
abDLOT RA aa nabonsust ‘III
ye 99°09 — ox— e1g 006 sii icersislateys\Satrra pele e c oks ocolteeeercacels % % a9! 9L
3'0— 0% 0— go 166 C96 Shiraiten erahete pie ects FESS oe OTD Oe ABC < acl 6
re 99° 0— og— rots) C28 Cer tent nett teste eee etree steer reese OSBrisUg spunod OF! FI
“2U0]D aboysuy 8
oT PQ | gl | COL, | 189 seeee = ee ee eee ene et eoee ese sreseeees Kon yo spunod 0% cI
"BQ Sq] SQL ‘sql "Sal
‘uoseunduo) fo punpuny lof fing ‘Tt
*2U09 ‘inp “YqUoutl | "IST QA | "pe Une "4YyOla4, Bar] spunod (COT Har | 0 UP
dad U0) dad ung | ad ung qy beat WYbAA suoyoy hog JO "ON
‘Tl Qa7 02% ‘Une SOSULISUY JO oN[VA SULNpPOAd=y]IWM PUB DALILIINU Bu1js03 SINVULLadxq—3Is[ SAIMAS
63
THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF ENSILAGE.
6 CEI “Aqyenb
T6 | 08's c OFOT 1%
6¢ | 60% g9 OSIT CSOT /380q 94} JO soles Sutpooord oM4 put 81q} Ul [voy pus Avy 0%
69 |.2r'3|] gg 968 GiB 9
PP | Ls ug 493 «| 0&8 ‘SAD OF PATI [RoW sjrend 27 {sep OT puodes [BOW Sjavsnb QT 8
PIT | 88° | SOL | seor 06 | skp OF ysag [wow szeNd g ‘osvlIsugq spunod og ‘Key spunod QT PL
69 | 00°S cL OSTT ¢LOT P 6
9°OL g 'z 08 0&8 0°, SARS 6 "0 Rb ONGria: e697 ste. e) ere) 'nisid'e eipietecctart paiems dim da etcre sfEp Or parqa sjivnb a1 sfep OL ; Cr
%7/o | “Sat "sq Pucdos sjivnb OF ‘sep OL Jsay ‘wou uIoO syavnb g ‘AvyT spunod gz
ier va eee SE eee UE ee ee OF Jee e TRoud ~ us
"quaa | ‘finp \8POad| -¢ Sf aged) ‘Z “UL
1D40008 | gyunp | Appr | /; fin: ‘Wyram aan spunod (OO, ag .
dad | wad ay) Ua | Moy | hoy | hon suoyvy hog Pele
Un») |Uuwp |! “Dp 8Q) “QU ba.44
"PE OUNL 07 pe lnyy—*asRylIsuy JO ON[BA BULd00F SU1saL— PL SHIMAS
£0°6 |@8°S | 82 | OOL | 089 | Seo | ZED | 929 |°**OSRrISM J9A019 spunod oF ‘{Boul UIOD spunod Fy ‘Kuz spunod g | oT
G69 |e6'L | SF S18 | G08 | G84 | L49L | AGL |°** ‘odurrsug us0% spunod 0p ‘frou WJOD spunod fy ‘Avy spunodg¢ | g
PL? 80°T 13 Ceg 698 098 8cg 0cg ee eCeeeesece @eere.ceeecs ene osvlisug ul0p spunod gc tL
00°T—/0F'0—| OI— | S86 | 926 | OL6 | C66 | CBB [Tor tt ttt tte ee rit reeesssess ss" aoe Isugq JOAC[ spunod oc] 6
19°S 89'°T SP a3), G9), OSL OL Led eoeeeoe eee ew ee ed Ce ee ee fr re ‘Avy spunod oz GI
°/o | “SQL | ‘Sql
*qua0 | ‘fnp \shnp | ‘v6, | ASL | “DES | “YIST | *YIB ‘Mbrvm aay fo spunod Qoot f.vaaa wor “Wout
dad | “ad | ce uz | dP ody YOON YO OW | U9 OW nanar ftiog up
uy | wg |umpy 890 ‘“9ybra4y | fo ON
SR awe ag eet en he Ls a ie eS a Ss OS
"U16 IM 02 YaCT YuvT—*aBBLISU Jo spury JUIAIAHIp JO IN[VA GAVLAINU 3u89,—" pz SHIWAS
Pan TR aT BR arse ea en Sete es a Ee RSME aE PRC A a tidy caomr: i ae
64 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
first sight appear; for it must be explained, first, that
the month of January, during which this Series was ‘con-
tinued, was the coldest and most inclement experienced
in this section for years ; second, that No. 14 was a cow,
dry upwards of a month prior to the commencement of
the tests, but which, about one week thereafter, came
back to her milk, she was finally dried off about the
middle of February ; and, third, that No. 16 was a sin-
gularly savage and unthrifty two-year-old Shorthorn bull,
that ill-brooked the close confinement incident to the ex-
periment. Again, Nos. 1 and 4 of Section III were
yearlings, weaned only a week or so prior to January 2d.
They had received, up to within a few days of that time,
hay, meal, and slops. No. 1 refused its rations at first,
and never ate more than half of the amount allowed.
No. 3, after the first week, ate nearly all. The close cor-
respondence of the results of Nos. 3 and 5 in Section V,
and Nos. 8 and 11 in Section VI, is especially worthy of
notice, and makes these four experiments particularly
valuable. In No. 18 of Section VII the heavier loss is
perhaps explained by the greater flow of milk, as shown
by the same number in Section VIII. It was remarked
by several in attendance on the animals that those fed on
ensilage alone appeared to suffer much more from the
cold than the others. Here we have practice confirming
theory, for the conversion o* a portion of the carbohy-
drates into acid and other principles, by the fermentation
incident to the process, and the consequent loss, compar-
ative, of the fat-formers, the fuel of the animal body,
would lead us to expect just such results.
In Series 2d the animals were the same as those dene
nated by similar numbers in Series Ist. Hach, No. is
excepted, received during the interval between the two
Series a daily ration, per one thousand pounds of live
weight, of fifty pounds of ensilage, corn; six pounds of
the best hay, and three pints of corn meal, and in this
THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF ENSILAGE. 65
time, about six weeks, No. 15 gained forty pounds; No.
9, thirty-eight pounds ; No. 14, fifty-three pounds ; No.
8, seventeen pounds; and No. 10, thirty-seven pounds.
The weather durmg the continuance of this Series was
damp and unfavorable, but by no means as cold as in the
January preceding, hence the better results in case of
No. 14, fed on ensilage alone. No. 9 demands a word or
so of explanation. Our farm animals relished the corn
ensilage from the start, but rejected the clover ensilage
at first, and it was several days before they became accus-
tomed to its use. This animal, No. 9, refused its rations
for a week, and in that time lost twenty-five pounds.
All the loss occurred in the first week. After that time,
becoming reconciled to the new food, it made steady and
continuous gains. This experiment enforces the neces-
sity of frequent weighings. It is evident that the highest
percentage of gain in both Series were made by animals
fed on mixed rations of ensilage and matters richer in
albuminoids.
In Series 3d, the animals were forced for the June
market, and all the dates save the first show the day
when each was sold to the butcher. In the interval be-
tween this Series and the preceding, all the animals ex-
cept No. 15 received the same rations as in the first
interval. No. 15 alone of all our farm animals, upward
of forty head, persistently refused the ensilage from the
first. It was therefore allotted the ration of hay in -
Series Ist and 2d, and, in the first interval, three pints
of meal in addition. After the close of Series 2d, we
endeavored to force it to eat the ensilage, but without
success. Hence its loss of thirty pounds between the
last two Series. The rapid gain of No. 21, a thorough-
bred Shorthorn, three and four-fifth pounds per day, is
especially noteworthy. No. 14 was quite heavy with calf.
One striking fact greatly in favor of ensilage was noticed
during this Series. The animals, although receiving
66 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
heavy and constantly increasing amounts of meal, never
became gorged. From the beginning to the end of the
Series their appetites were hearty and vigorous, their
bowels open but not too loose, their digestion good. One
word as to the cost of the rations.. The price of meal
and hay, of course, varies in different localities. The
corn ensilage, from the planting to the final weighing
down in silos, cost us one dollar and fifty cents per ton,
or seven and a half cents per hundred-weight. ‘This esti-
mate includes the price paid for fertilizers, interest on
land, ete.
|'The experiments given above are worthy of the careful
consideration of all who are interested in the subject of
ensilage, and, with the explanations given of them, these
tables convey the story in a most compact form. Tables
with figures repel many persons, but there is no other
method by which facts like these can be presented so
compactly. The foregoing article, with the tables, is
from the ‘‘ American Agriculturist.”—ED. |
CHAPTER XIII.
AN ABOVE GROUND SILO.
The owner of a silo made of wood and entirely above
ground, describes in the French ‘‘ Journal d’ Agriculture
Pratique” the method of its construction: A certain
number of beams, A, figure 18 (which are described here-
after), are laid upon the soil at a distance apart of about
two feet. Hach one of these beams has a mortice at each
end. ‘The corn-stalks are discharged upon these beams
and laid crosswise of them, building up the pile very
regularly. When this is done, some boards are laid upon
AN ABOVE GROUND SILO. 67
the pile, and other beams, C, placed directly over the
lower ones. The uprights, B, B, pierced with holes, are
set in place ; these pass through the mortices of the beams,
and the ends which pass through the lower beam, A, are
“secured below by strong iron bolts, through the holes in
M Late jee
~_==
q it
MUNBSAOIL TIM tie Ss
Fig. 18.—AN OPEN-AIR SILO.
A, The pressure is produced by two powerful jacks,
placed opposite each other at the upright B, and resting
upon the beam C. The power of the jacks is exercised
against a stout iron bolt placed ina hole in B. As the
handles of the jacks are turned, the beam C is pressed
down, and when a new hole in the upright B is exposed,
an iron bolt is passed through it to retain the pressure,
Fig. 19,—BEAM OF SILO.
and the jacks are taken to the next upright on the same
side of the silo. After all upon one side have been treated,
the jacks are taken to the uprights of the opposite side,
and the pressure applied. This is continued until the
last beam has been pressed at both ends. Pressure is
68 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
applied in this manner daily for eighteen days; after this
it suffices to press every eight or ten days. The ensi-
lage is removed by taking off one frame, consisting of two
beams and two uprights, and cutting off the correspond-
ing slice of fodder. The corn-fodder preserved in this
manner was the Caragua corn, slightly whitened by frosts.
It was in a perfect state of preservation. Only a thick-
ness of between three and four inches all around the pile
was black and moldy. One of the advantages of this
method is the ability to regulate the pressure at will. A
beam (A, C, figure 18) is shown in figure 19 ; thisis formed
of two nieces of timber, a, a, b, 6, separated by the blocks,
c, d. The spaces between the énd blocks, and those next
to them, form the mortices e, through which the uprights,
(B, figure 18) slide. The owner concludes the description
as follows: ‘‘The silo I have made, holds about two
and a half tons of corn-fodder. The frames are about
two fect apart, and the length of the mass is about ten
feet. The two jacks exercise a pressure of over twenty
thousand pounds at each end of the beams, amounting
in round numbers to about sixteen thousands upon each
square yard. It is to this powerful pressure that I at-
tribute the perfect preservation of the ensilage in the
open air, without the aid of a fodder cutter, and without
any masoury or earth-work,”—American Agriculturist.
‘© SOUR-FODDER ”—PRIMITIVE ENSILAGE. 69
CORP ACP ihe ACE ¥
“ SOUR-FODDER”—PRIMITIVE ENSILAGE.
[It has been evident to those who have watched the
progress of ensilage in this country that this method of
preserving fodder presented great advantages to those
with sufficient capital to construct silos and carry out
the method on a large scale. On the other hand, it
offered little to the farmer with but a few cows, as he
could not afford the outlay required for building silos
and providing the appliances necessary in preparing and
storing the fodder. On page 47 is given an account of
the methods of preserving fodder, in Hungary, without
the use of a silo, but by merely pitting it in the earth,
and we now give a description, by Mr. H. Nicholas Jar-
chow, of the German method of preparing ‘‘ sour fodder,”
which was apparently the first attempt at preserving fod-
der by means of ensilage. This chapter will afford useful
suggestions to those who would preserve their fodder on
a small scale, and experiments judiciously made will, no
doubt, greatly extend the benefits of this method of pre-
serving green fodder of all kinds.—Ep. ]
Mr. Jarchow says :—In Northern Europe there oc-
curred, about half a century ago, several successive years
which were so unusually cold and wet at harvest time
that farmers, being unable to harvest their forage crops,
left them to rot on the field. The second cut of clover
and the aftermath were generally lost. A German farmer,
whose name is now forgotten, conceived the idea of throw-
ing his entire forage crop, cut late in the fall, into a deep
pit dug in the field, and to cover it with earth to protect
it from frost. The forage when thrown into the pit was
very wet, was hard on account of the growth of woody
fibre, and the most hoped for it was that it would make
70 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
a useful addition to the compost or manure heap. Upon
opening the pit the following spring the farmer, to his
great astonishment, found, instead of a mass of manure,
a solid body of vegetable matter, giving off an agreeable
odor, the individual parts of which were thoroughly fer-
mented and softened. Upon trial, he found that the
farm animals ate the contents of the pit with avidity,
improved on it and soon preferred it to their usual feed.
The results of this farmer’s experiment soon became
widely known, and agriculturists, especially dairy-
men, imitated this method of curing forage. ‘The agri-
cultural journals took up the subject, and these and
scientific investigators concluded that there was here dis-
covered a new and cheap method of preserving fodder
plants, and one especially adapted to small farms. A
method, which, by fermenting them, would render the
plants more digestible and nutritious and at the same
time more palatable.
This method received the name of ‘‘ Preparation of
Sour-Fodder.” It is true that there appeared opponents
to this method who declared that animals did not like
forage thus prepared, and when forced to eat it were
subjected to maladies and even died. When these cases
were investigated, the untoward results were found to be
due to improper preparation, allowing the forage to
mold, to salting the fodder or to exclusive feeding on
fodder thus prepared. As early as forty years ago it was,
in Germany, an established fact that well prepared sour
fodder, when properly fed, would not only be eagerly
eaten by the farm animals, but would agree with and
improve them.
I well recollect that in that year of general dearth,
1847, the agricultural journals advised farmers to preserve
their fodder plants in this manner in order to keep
them longer, to. improve them and to increase the quan-
tity of forage. It was remarked that every plant, if it
*“ SOUR-FODDER ”—PRIMITIVE ENSILAGE. 71
were not poisonous and had not become too dry, could be
made useful for feeding purposes. ‘The farmers accord-
ingly gathered not only the proper forage plants, but .
potato vines, turnip leaves, the leaves of trees and grape-
vines, the last cut from meadows and clover-fields ; nay,
they even gathered plants which are usually refused by
animals, such as horsetails (Hquisetum), swamp grasses,
sedges, etc. It was demonstrated that these plants, un-
der this treatment, became not only harmless but pala-
table.
TO PREPARE SOUR-FODDER.
The method followed in Germany is to excavate oblong
pits, having a surface of 200 to 300 square feet, and eight
to ten feet deep. These are made on a part of the farm
where there is a heavy clay soil, and where there is a per-
fect drainage, so that no water can settle in the pit. The
sides of the pit must be perpendicular. The forage, after
it is stowed in the pit, begins to shrink, and unless the
sides are perpendicular the mass cannot settle equally.
Some farmers line the bottom and sides of the pit with
brick. These afford excellent storage places for sour-
fodder, but the mason work is not necessary.
THE FILLING OF THE PITS.
As soon as the fodder plants are cut, and before they
can dry, a layer two or three feet thick is uniformly
spread over the bottom of the pit and tramped down by
the workmen. It is not advisable to use wooden ram-
mers as the layers are apt to be, in parts, too closely
compacted. Layer after layer of fodder is added, and
tramped down, until the mass of fodder reaches three or
four feet above the surface of the soil. Earth is then to
be thrown around this portion which projects above the
top of the pit to form a sort of curb around it about four
feet thick, which is to be firmly pressed down. By
"2 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
spreading the forage evenly as it is added, and tramping
it down uniformly, the air is expelled from the mass. To
. expel the air more certainly, and to avoid air spaces in
the fodder, water is often poured into the pit shortly
before closing it. In case the fodder is cut during a dry
time, water will be required to generate fermentation.
Salt, the addition of which has been recommended by
some, has not been found to be advantageous, as it delays
fermentation. After the pit has been filled in the manner
described, a layer of clayey soil, three or four feet in thick-
ness, is thrown upon the fodder. This covering should
be somewhat the highest in the centre, and pressed down
all around so that it may shed water. A few days after
the pit is made the top will begin to settle and cracks
will appear in the covering of earth. More earth must
be added and firmly pressed down in order to exclude the
air.
In about six or eight weeks fodder thus pitted will be
cured and ready for use, and will be preserved, unim-
paired as food, for several years, if it has been judiciously
treated.
The method here given is the usual way in which Ger-
man farmers prepare ‘‘ sour-fodder,” though there may
be differences on account of local or climatic reasons.
OPENING THE PITS.
In opening the pits, care must be taken to prevent the
access of air and water to the forage. It is best to make
a small opening at one end of the pit, and having taken
out the needed quantity of the forage, to close the open-
ing with straw, or boards, and earth. ‘The fodder within
the pit will be found in a compact mass, which must be
cut with a suitable knife, and must be fed before it dries
and becomes worthless.
ENSILAGE IN GERMANY. "3
CHA Phe a Y.
ENSILAGE IN GERMANY.
[Those who, by travel or by reading, are at all familiar
with German agriculture, have known of the methods of
preserving fodder crops followed in that country. They
know that even the smallest farmers, as a matter of strict-
est economy, often preserved their clover and other fod-
der crops as ‘‘sour-fodder,” ‘‘ sour keep,” and ‘‘ brown
hay ”—and these terms, and the articles they represent,
were familiar to them long before ‘‘ silo” and “ ensilage”
had a place in the literature of agriculture. The origin
of this German method is given in the preceding chapter
by Mr. Jarchow, and it will be seen that ensilage was
successfully practised by German farmers long before the
silos of M. Goffart presented the subject of ensilage upon
a sufficiently grand scale to attract the attention of the
agricultural world. We would not detract from the
credit due M. Goffart for his labors, but we would not
have the humble farmers of Germany deprived of their
share of praise for establishing silos on a small and prac-
ticable scale. Mr. Jarchow has prepared, at our request,
the following chapter upon the general practice of ensi-
lage in Germany.—ED. |
In German husbandry, beet raising is of the greatest
importance, not only for sugar making but also on ac-
count of the great nutritive value of both the beet and its
leaves. Though the leaves are occasionally thinned dur-
ing the time of the growth of the plants, at harvest, in
the fall, there is a great mass of green leaves on hand,
averaging 4,000 pounds to the acre. These leaves repre-
sent to the German farmer a money value of from six to
seven dollars. When dried, the leaves lose their nutritive
properties, while when pitted green they are not only
74 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
fully, preserved but undergo chemical changes which
adapt them for feeding purposes.
Sour-fodder, made from beet leaves, is cured as folicuee
The leaves, together with the upper, green, woody part
or ‘‘neck” of the root, are cut and left a day or so on the
field to dry off a little, so that the adhering soil may be
easily removed. Wooden forks are used and a sieve five
feet long ; this is made of laths which are separated three-
quarters of an inch in order to allow the adhering earth,
which is loosened by shaking the sieve, to pass through
readily. The leaves, after having been thoroughly shak-
en in the sieve and freed from the soil, are packed in pits
six to eight feet deep, which are at the bottom six feet
and at the top ten feet wide. The leaves are then closely
tramped down. The forage is accumulated in the pit in
this wise to a height of three feet above the surface of the
soil, and is then surrounded with a wall of closely pressed
earth three feet thick. The whole pit is then covered
with three feet of earth. Some farmers, fearing that the
fodder may be spoiled in the pit, add salt to it, but the
opinion at present universally accepted in regard to the
use of salt is that it is injurious. The principal object
of pitting the forage is to cause fermentation and the
formation of lactic acid, and both of these are hindered by
the use of salt. Lactic acid is formed when lime enters
into organic compounds, some of which contain—and
others do not contain—nitrogen. ‘These conditions are
present in the beet leaves. From experiments it appears
that an addition of grain chaff to beet leaves has proved
to be very advantageous, because this dry, and by itself nu-
tritious substance, absorbs the liquid constituents of the
beet leaves when packed with them in the pits. Besides,
an addition of chaff, not exceeding five per cent of the
weight of leaves and beet heads, regulates the fermenta-
tion of the green mass, renders it drier and more accepta-
ble to the farm animals, while at the same time the woody
ENSILAGE IN GERMANY. "5
fiber in the chaff becomes softened. The sugar in the
beet leaves and heads is entirely decomposed, and those
parts of the plants which contain nitrogen are also sub-
jected to decomposition, while the fatty substances increase
by thirty-three per cent. In fresh beet leaves the propor-
tion of the nitrogenous nutritive properties, to those
which do not contain nitrogen is 1 : 2.5 (just as in clover
hay). After the beet leaves have undergone the full
process in the souring pit, this proportion is changed to
1:5, a proportion which is found in good meadow hay.
Owing to the fermentation in the souring pit, beet leaves
therefore lose the uncommonly rich proportion of their
nutritive properties, and enter into a gocd medium pro-
portion, such as is found in the standard fodder, meadow
hay.
After from five to six months the pit may be opened,
and there will be found a well preserved nourishing fod-
der which every farm animal will eat with avidity.
Maize or Indian corn, in North German husbandry,
does not play so important a part as in South Germany,
because Lhe summers in the northern portion are seldom
sufficiently hot to allow of its ripening. Maize, there-
fore, in North Germany, is only cultivated for soiling.
But if cut green, maize cannot be used exclusively in
feeding their cattle when farmers wish to fully utilize
it, because maize does not contain a sufficient amount
of nitrogenous substances. This proportion must be at
least 1 (containing nitrogen) : 7 (not containing nitro-
gen), but is in green maize mostly 1: 10, seldom 1: 9.5.
Farmers, therefore, mix green maize with other fodder
materials in order to make up for the deficiency of nitro-
gen in green maize. Usually they resort to clover in
blossom, young grass, oil-cake, etc. If, at the approach
of September, a farmer has a good stock of green maize
on hand, it is mixed with clover hay or good meadow hay
and pitted in the same way as other fodder plants are
76 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
treated in the souring pit. The forage is ready for use
at the end of eight or ten weeks ; it has a dark green hue
and emits an agreeably sour odor.
In South Germany and Austria the summers are
warmer and of longer duration than at the north. There
the maize ripens in time and can be utilized in the same
manner asin America. Maize is, in these parts of Kurope,
used for the preparation of sour forage, but only after it
is fully ripe and the ears are gathered. Freshly cut
maize stalks are laid lengthwise in pits ten feet wide and
the laborers closely tramp them down. When the pit is
filled, heavily loaded wagons or heavy rollers are drawn
over the pit, and thus its contents are pressed together as
much as possible in order to avoid cavities in the mass,
and the consequent accumulation of air. The space
gained by this pressing is at once filled with fresh stalks
and stamped down again, and the filling and refilling are
continued until the mass of fodder is three feet above the
surface of the soil. The top of the fodder heap is made
one foot narrower than at the surface of the soil in order
that in sinking, the mass may not catch on the wall and
cause cavities. The projecting part of the souring pit is
surrounded with a heavily pressed earth-wall, three feet
thick, and then covered with a layer of earth of the same
thickness, to which a conical shape is given. In from
three to four months the fodder is ready for use and can
be preserved by proper treatment, especially by protec-
tion against air and water, for several years in a good,
sound condition.
In conclusion, I may remark that in Germany, in feed-
ing green maize in soiling. the earlier ripening kinds have
proved much more valuable than the late ripening. The
reports of several of the principal experiment stations
concur in stating that the early ripening sorts of maize,
grown upon equally large areas of the same soil, contain,
when cut at the same time (September 1st) from one-
SWEET ENSILAGE. FA
sixth to one-fifth part more of dry substance than the
later ripening. Besides, the dry substance of the early
ripening varieties contain much more nutritive constitu-
ents than the later ripening, and that, in regard to the
nutrition of animals, three pounds of forage of the form-
er are estimated to be equal to four pounds of the late
ripening kinds.
COR ARTE bev P.
SWEET ENSILAGE.
In the early days of ensilage the writer received a
fruit jar, the cover of which closed it air-tight, contain-
ing finely cut corn stalks. No letter of explanation ac-
companied the jar, and after waiting several days for one,
the contents of the jar were examined. Upon removing
the air-tight cover, the odor of acetic acid was so positive
and pervading as to suggest the thought that some one
had discovered a method of producing vinegar from corn
stalks and had sent this specimen to illustrate his
method. We afterwards learned that it was sent as a
sample of ensilage which was so sour that the owner
feared to feed it to his cows. It has been the experience
of those who have preserved fodder in silos that, when
opened, the ensilage was often intensely sour, and upon
exposure to the air, often grew still more sour. On the
other hand, the contents of other silos, when opened,
were quite without acidity, and even had a rich odor like
that of dried fruit, as described by some, while others
compared the odor to molasses. While the animals ate
the sour ensilage with avidity, there was a feeling of ap-
prehension that long continued feeding upon such in-
tensely acid food might result unfavorably, and one of
78 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
the first questions presented to those interested in the
science of ensilage was : ‘“‘ How can we secure sweet en-
silage?” This subject early engaged the attention of
Manly Miles, M. D., now Professor of Agriculture at
the Massachusetts Agricultural College at Amherst.
Doctor Miles presented the results of his experiments, and
the views derived from them, at the Ensilage Congress
of 1884.
Doctor Miles’ conclusions are here given in our own
language: The various kinds of fermentation that take
place in vegetable substances are due to minute plants
(Fungi) which by their growth set up changes in vege-
table compounds. Thus, the yeast plant ferments the
bread, beer, etc.; and similar minute plants, which occur
in fruit juices, produce wine, cider, etc. The minute -
plants which produce these forms of fermentation re-
quire the access of air that they may perform their func-
tions. There is another group of these minute organ-
isms which multiply in a different manner from those —
just noted, and which cause the formation of lactic and
other acids, which are known as dacterza. ‘These occur
in myriads in fresh ensilage, and live, multiply and carry
on their fermentation when the air is completely excluded
from the silo. Doctor Miles’ experiments were directed
to ascertaining the conditions under which these bacteria
live, and how they could be destroyed. He found that
the bacteria of lactic fermentation, and of kindred fer-
ments, are killed by a temperature of 116°, if this be
long continued for some time; but they are destroyed
much more promptly if exposed to a higher temperature
of 120° to 125°.
When freshly cut corn ensilage is exposed to free ac-
cess of air in the silo the mass heats. It undergoes a
process of gentle burning (Hremacausis), with a rise of
temperature which may readily reach to 150°. Hence,
if the cut fodder lies up loosely in the silo, and that is
SWEET ENSILAGE. 79
slowly filled, the filling being continued through several
days, a high temperature, from 125° to 140°, or more, may
be easily obtained with an imperceptible loss of fodder,
Doctor Miles ascertained that the exclusion of air from
fresh ensilage, whether packed or not, does not only not
destroy the growth of the bacteria of fermentation, but
promotes it. The result of this continued growth of
bacteria is the conversion of the entire contents of the
silo into what is known as ‘‘sour ensilage.” This is
sourer the older it is. ‘There are a great variety of pro-
ducts from this repressed fermentation, and on exposure
to the air the ensilage becomes, in some cases, still
sourer from the formation of acetic acid, or vinegar.
It has been ascertained that the exclusion of air from
ensilage that has been heated to 120° or 125°, stops all
action, and the mass gradually coolsdown. The bacteria
of fermentation are, at this temperature, completely de-
stroyed—root, branch and germ—and the mass remains
as if it were in a completely sealed preserve jar. Indeed,
the process of ensilage is much the same as that of pre-
serving fruits. By the exclusion of air while the sub-
stance is hot, fermentation cannot take place.
The above is essentially the theory as announced by
Doctor Miles. After its announcement, cases in which the
filling of silos had been, by accident, very slow, in which
great heat had taken place, and on this account were sup-
posed to be ruined, were reported ; but, contrary to expec-
tation, they yielded sweet ensilage, the best the farmers
reporting the cases had everseen. The odor of the ensilage
was positively sweet—like that of molasses, and it was
greatly relished by the cows and proved to be superior as
a milk-producing feed.
After the theory and practice of Doctor Miles were an-
nounced, we heard of those of Mr. Geo. Fry, in England,
who had heen working in the same direction, and had ar-
80 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
rived, at the same conclusions. Since then Doctor Miles’
views have been confirmed over and over again.
In a pamphlet, entitled *‘The Theory and Prac-
tice of Sweet Ensilage,” George Fry, F.L.S., gives the
results of his experiments upon sweet ensilage. The
reader of Mr. Fry’s work must bear in mind that his en-
silage is very different from our own, where Indian corn
(maize) is almost the sole crop ensiloed. Mr. Fry’s
experience was with ‘‘green rye, crimson clover, with
and without oats ; tares or vetches, with oats; Trifolium -
pratense (red clover), with rye grass; and meadow
grass.” The whole teaching of Fry’s book may be
summed up in this, from page 42 :
‘* One condition, I believe, to be absolutely essential for
the production of sweet ensilage, viz. : The temperature
of the ensilage must exceed 122° Fahr.; if that tem-
perature is not reached, the ensilage will be sour.”—
How far this axiom will apply to ensilage of Indian
corn, experiments must verify.
CHAP Tih. say Lk.
EXPERIENCE WITH ENSILAGE,
J. P. ROBERTS, PROFESSOR OF AGRICULTURE, CORNELL UNIVERSITY.
I have had some experience in building silos, and in
cutting and feeding ensilage, and perhaps 1t may be of
some value to those who intend to adopt this new method
of preserving fodder. As I have formerly stated, the silo
should be Jong and narrow, with the long side next to
the barn. If the extreme inside length were thirty-two
feet and the width sixteen feet, there should be three
cross divisions in it ; this gives four compartments, eight
by sixteen feet each. If the extreme depth of the silo is
twenty feet, it can be filled up fifteen feet and will settle
EXPERIENCE WITH ENSILAGE. 81
to about eleven, nearly all the settling occurring within
forty-eight hours. Nearly all the upper half of the silo
is for temporary use, and, therefore, may be constructed
of rough unmatched boards. There will be wanted, at
most, only twelve feet of air-tight, stone, or wooden wall.
One year I raised and ensilaged about three acres of
Southern white corn. The drouth cut it short, and
there proved to be scarcely fifty tons of it. It was fed
to fattening steers, milch cows, and three-fourths blood
Holstein heifers, coming two years old in June and July.
The three heifers selected were an average of six that had
been running in an open basement, and had been fed on
hay alone. ‘They were put into stanchions on a plank
floor (for the first time) and about two weeks afterwards
the experiment began. Hach was daily fed fifty pounds
of ensilage and one-half pound of malt sprouts. The
weights at various times were as follows :
No, 1. No. 2. No, 3.
Pepe et... 2 se<s 770 pounds 650 pounds 780 pounds
MATCH Va: ates aleé 832°“ So.“ 834 *
seme | Ree 830 = S$ 890“ 850“
atta | ma ee 84 a 900“ 820 ‘“
Roe eee Sia 5 Sea3)° 824.“
March 31st two pounds of cotton-seed meal were added
to each ration :
April 7........ 890 pounds 850 pounds . 840 pounds
ee | ER sia. $38 - ** $63.6 .*
ae. ee ae Sa. |S 925 = ‘¢ 02) =
May 4s 6 iieoss= aig. * 960 “* 926 “
If the weight of March 3d be taken as the most correct,
it is evident that there was no such true gain as the fig-
ures between February 24th and that date indicate, but
rather an increase of the contents of the stomach, due to
more palatable food—then, the increase shown is but
fourteen pounds for the three animals in twenty-one
days. It is evident that this ration was very close to a
maintenance one, as it was meant to be. The analysis of
the ensilage, as well as all the other foods experimented
with, has been made. ‘The gain in the last twenty-three
82 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
days, when the two pounds of cotton-seed meal were
added, was two hundred and twenty-two pounds, while
in the interim of fourteen days, from March 24th to
April 7th, the gain was fifty pounds. Without doubt, ~
this last gain was largely made during the first seven
days of April, when the meal was fed. From the above,
may not the following conclusions be drawn? That
Southern corn ensilaged will maintain young animals,
but that it is better economy to add to it some food rich _
inalbuminoids. The heifers, fed as above, came through
the winter looking far better than the three of the same
age fed on hay, and done much better in the spring after
they went to pasture.
In February we had two aged cows go dry, and one
heifer; they were then low in flesh, having been milked
over a year. With feeding stuffs ranging from thirty-
five to forty dollars per ton, they could not be sold at an
average of more than twenty-five dollars. I determined
to feed them. ‘They weighed as follows:
Heifer. No. 1. No. 2.
GU. cod ser cnt nas 1,150 pounds 1,000 pounds os pounds
April Ge os ve oes 13 320 ‘i 150 1,0
Selling price.. . $65 74 $50 00 $49 a7
They were fed fifty-two pounds of ensilage and eight
quarts of corn-meal each, per day, until April 5th, when
two quarts of cotton-seed meal were substituted for two
quarts of corn-meal. The best results in feeding for |
milk was when ensilage was fed in connection with about
two pounds of corn-meal, two pounds of bran and three
pounds of cotton-seed meal.
On the 16th and 17th of June following I put into one of
our silos (eleven by sixteen, and twenty-eight feet deep)
three acres of rye and one and a half acres of clover ; one
load of clover was sandwiched between two loads of rye.
The fuel was one and a half cords of two-foot wood ; the
engineer a sixteen-year old student ; one man in the silo
the first day, two the second ; seven men and two teams
EXPERIENCE WITH ENSILAGE. 83
to cut, haul, and feed the material. The rye averaged
fully six and a half feet in height, and grew on the
ground where the ensilage corn grew last year, which
was again planted to ensilage corn. The clover was
heavy, and together they filled twenty-two feet of the
silo. It settled six feet in forty-eight hours, and appeared
to be about done. This, at forty-five pounds to the cubic
foot, gave sixty-three tons. The pressure is secured by
about three tons of stone piled at the corners, and a
screw anchored in the bottom of the silo, made of two
sections of one and a quarter inch square iron ; the third
section round, four feet of it having threads cut, five to
the inch. Two eight-inch timbers are laid lengthwise
about four feet apart ; short blocks upon these form a
sure foundation for the circular, cast-iron cap, upon
which the nut turns. Notwithstanding all that has been
said against the rod pressure, [ like it. The silo was
covered, weighted, and screwed down within half an hour
from the time the cutter stopped, and less than two
hours labor of one man had been spent in turning down
the screw ; ten minutes will unseal it. :
‘The reader who is balancing the pros and cons of ensi-
lage in his mind, is without doubt still undecided, but I
think I have given data from which a better understand-
ing may be reached. It is utterly impossible for anyone
to make others’ circumstances similar to his own, but it
may not be unprofitable to enumerate the various items
of cost, etc. First, we have a stationary engine for
threshing—a horse power may be used. ‘The siios of
one hundred and fifty tons capacity together cost about
three hundred dollars. The cutter cost one hundred
dollars, but we need one for other use. ‘Two of the men
employed cost one dollar per day; seven men, one dollar
and twenty-five cents per day; and one man, one dollar
and seventy-five cents per day. The teams are worth
very little to us about that time of the year and their
84 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
labor is light. There is a little charge to be made for
the use of tools and implements. The three acres of rye
had a dressing of fifteen loads of farm manure, worth to
us fifteen dollars. Perhaps half of this should be charged
to the succeeding corn crop.
What it will cost A or B to raise three acres of rye, I
cannot say, nor what one and a half acre of clover is
worth ; the second growth will probably be heavier than
the first. From September until June I had ready sale
for about 5,000 quarts of milk per month, at five cents
per quart. If drouth comes, it is difficult to produce
it, for the more cows one purchases the more the evil
is aggravated; but with ensilage, cows can be kept
from flies, out of the sun, fed in the stables, and turned
out at night.
I believe the greatest utility of silos will be found to
consist in the means they furnish of preserving forage
plants in a green and palatable state, which may be easily
grown in abundance in May and June, but if not then
secured they would become dried up and nearly werth-
less ; of, if dried and housed, the animals appear to have
but little relish for them in the hot dry days of August.
The reasons for building silos with small compartments ©
are manifold ; a small compartment may be filled and
sealed up in a single day, thereby not seriously interfer-
ing with the regular work. Hach forage plant may be
taken when in its best condition. One compartment
may be filled early with rye and clover, which is showing
a tendency to spoil by lodging, or is full of weeds that it
is desirable to eradicate ; a second, with oats and a second
cutting of the former clover field, or a weedy, belated
piece of timothy. A piece of fodder corn and aftermath
would fill a third compartment later in the season.
If the compartments are small, they may be uncovered
entirely and fed from the top, and if not all consumed,
they can be filled up with new material; or, if one or
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ON ENSILAGE. 85
more compartments are entirely emptied, they may be
refilled in September, thus securing a two-fold benefit
from them. From my experience, I judge that a com-
partment not entirely emptied in the spring, if disturbed
only on the top, would sustain little loss until June if re-
sealed, or it might be left open, and a little of that ex-
posed to the air daily, fed to the horses as cut feed.
Our horses, thus fed last winter, relished it very much.
There are many problems in regard to ensilage that are
still unsolved ; but should everything be found favorable
to the new method, still there are men who would have
no more use for a silo, than for a trotting-horse. There
are men having so little energy and skill, that should
you give them the best herd of Shorthorns, they would
become little better than scrubs in ten years. Under cer-
tain conditions the method can be adopted with profitable
results ; but he who rushes thoughtlessly into it will find
that ensilage is too ‘‘ Frenchy,” unless mixed with a
liberal allowance of brains, .
CHAP PE x VI EF,
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ON ENSILAGE.
The following items, of interest to those who are in-
vestigating the subject of ensilage, not properly belonging
to either of the preceding chapters, are here brought to-
gether in a supplement.
INCREASING THE CAPACITY OF A SILO.
Cut fodder corn finally settles in the silo to two-thirds
or one-half its original bulk. If a silo be filled and
86 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
weights put on, the mass settles, and there is a great
waste of space. To obviate this, and to utilize the full
capacity of the silo, Mr. Mills proposes to erect a frame of
plank to extend above the upper edge of the masonry of
the silo to a hight corresponding to about half its depth.
After the silo proper, the enclosure of masonry, concrete, .
or of whatever the structure may be built, is filled with
the material, this frame is to be put on, and the filling
continued into that. ‘The covers and weights are to be
placed upon the contents, and after these have settled
down to the silo proper, the frame is to be removed and
the covering put on permanentiy.
ENSILAGE FOR POULTRY.
All who have had any experience with poultry are aware
of the great benefit that comes from a proper supply of
green vegetable food during the winter. This is ordi-
narily supplied by feeding cabbages, stored in the usual
manner, or roots. ‘Those who have tried it, assert that
ensilage of Indian corn may be fed to fowls as an equiva-
lent for other green food at a much less expense than such
food can be supplied in any other form.
THE CHEMISTRY OF ENSILAGE.
Like other new methods in agriculture, ensilage has
its enthusiastic advocates, and its opponents, or, at least,
those who are indifferent to it.
Much that has been written upon the subject is in a
style that may be considered as sensational, and calcu-
lated to repel the earnest seeker after facts, and convey
the impression that a method advocated in so extrava-
gant a manner may not be of real value.
It is claimed by those who are opposed to the method,
that chemical analysis shows that corn fodder is injured
by ensilage, and its feeding value lessened by the loss of
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ON ENSILAGE. 87
important constituents. This statement rests mainly
upon the results obtained by Moser at the Vienna Experi-
ment Station, an abstract of whose article was presented
by Prof. H. P. Armsby, of the Sheffield Scientific School,
New Haven, Conn,
The summing up of the analyses of Moser shows that
the corn fodder, as treated by him, lost in the silo from
eight to thirty-eight per cent of albuminoids, and a loss
of thirteen to fifty-eight per cent of nitrogen-free extract,
such as starch, sugar, etc.
It should be stated that these analyses are not strictly
those of ensilage, but of corn fodder made into bundles,
placed in the silo at different depths, and surrounded by
the cut fodder. A portion of the bundles of fodder
were allowed to wilt for a few days before they were
buried in the cut fodder, a condition to which ensilage,
in this country at least, is not subjected. It is a well-
known fact that fermentation can not take place without
a loss in the material fermented. The object in ensilage
is not to encourage fermentation, but to check it. If
the silo is perfectly tight, fermentation will cease as soon
as the oxygen in the air that is inclosed in the cut fodder
is used up. ‘The more perfect the process, the less will
be the fermentation, and, of course, the smaller the loss
in the constituents of the fodder. That there will be
some loss is inevitable, but it will not be claimed that
Moser’s analyses show what that loss is, in the best con-
structed and best managed silos. When that loss of
feeding constituents is accurately ascertained, we shall
then be able to judge whether or not it 1s counterbal-
anced by the advantages of ensilage.
The author of the article referred to, Prof. Armsby,
in his admirable ‘‘ Manual of Cattle Feeding,” remarks :
‘*Corn being a comparatively cheap crop, the losses of
material during the fermentation might be compensated
by the improved quality of the residue.”
88 SILOS AND ENSILAGE.
“‘Tt does not appear from Grandeau’s analyses, how-
ever, that there is any marked difference in this réspect
between fresh maize and ensilage. If this is generally
the case, then fermented corn.fodder has all the advan-
tages of the fresh fodder, and no others, except perhaps
as regards palatability, and ensilage is to be looked upon
simply as a method of preserving corn fodder ; and the
question of its adoption is a purely economical one.”
THE CHARACTER OF THE MANURE.
In considering the advantages of ensilage, the superior
mechanical condition of the manure from animals fed
upon it, should not be overlooked. When ordinary corn
fodder is fed without cutting, the animals reject the hard
lower portions, and these go to the manure pile, adding
to its bulk rather than to its value, and making the
manure very difficult to handle or to manage. ‘The
fodder being cut fine for ensilage is all eaten. Should
any be rejected, and find its way into the manure, the
small size of the pieces make them unobjectionable.
THE ENSILAGE CONGRESS.
In the year 1882 some gentlemen interested in the
preservation of fodder by ensilage, and in the machinery
used in the process, issued a call for a meeting of those
who practised this method. It was held in New York
City and was attended by an unexpectedly large number,
showing that the method of preserving fodder by ensilage
was already receiving the attention of many farmers and
dairymen. ‘he results of the first gathermg were so
satisfactory that it was followed each year by others, and
at the meeting in 1886 a permanent organization, The
Ensilage Congress, was formed. 'The Congress has the
usual officers, and is to meet yearly in New York City at
the call of the President. The officers chosen for 1886 |
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ON ENSILAGE. 89
were: President, Edward Gridley ; Secretary, J. B.
Brown; Treasurer, W. W. Merriam; Vice-Presidents,
O. B. Potter and nineteen others. The annual dues
are two dollars. A Report of the transactions of the
Congress is published yearly.
CRIMSON OR SCARLET CLOVER.
Those who read recent English works on ensilage will
find frequent mention of the Crimson or Scarlet Clover
(Trifolium incarnatum), frequently called in England
red-top clover. This is an annual species, growing about
two feet high, and bearimg an oblong head of very brill-
iant flowers—so showy, indeed, that the plant is often
cultivated as an ornamental annual. As an agricultural
plant it is of some importance in Europe, being sown in
autumn and perfecting in early spring. In his work on
““Sweet Ensilage,” Mr. George Fry makes frequent ref-
erence to this clover. On page 57 he says: ‘‘ Then,
again, there are many excellent fodder crops, such as
Trifolium incarnatum (in my opinion the finest of all
British fodder crops),” ete.
This clover was introduced into this country as early
as 1818, but has never made a place for itself in our agri-
culture. It may be now, in view of its value as an ensi-
lage crop, and the fact that being an annual, it may be
of use as a cleansing crop, that some of our farmers may
be induced to make a trial of it. Its feeding value, while
not equal to that of the perennial clovers, stands high.
TO BUILD A CHEAP SILO.
Whatever cheapens the cost of the silo, or lessens the
expense of filling it, will hasten the introduction of the
method, especially upon the farms of those of moderate
means. Professor Manly Miles, of the Massachusetts Ag-
ricultural College, in describing the silos used by him
90 SILOS AND ENSILAGE,
in his important experiments on ensilage, says: ‘A
balloon frame of scantling, of suitable size, covered on the
outside with matched boards, and lined on the inside
with two thicknesses of one-inch matched boards, with
a layer of tarred paper between them, thus securing a
practically air-tight inclosure, surrounded by a dead-air
space as a protection against frost, is, in the opinion of
the writer, the best and cheapest form of construction.
If the boards and timbers are saturated with hot coal-tar,
which can readily be done with trifling expense, the du-
ration of the silo will be very much increased.”
THE TEMPERATURE IN THE SILO.
To ascertain the temperature of the ensilage at any given
depth in the silo, provide a piece of gas-pipe an inch in
diameter. At the lower end of this pipe, weld, or attach
by a screw thread, a short, steel point. Just above this
point bore several holes about one-eighth of an inch in
diameter. At the upper end of the pipe, attach a ferrule
to which are welded two arms, six to nine inches long.
Thrust a lock of wool down to the bottom of the tube, to
serve as a cushion upon which the thermometer may rest.
To ascertain the temperature of the ensilage at any re-
quired depth, thrust the gas-tube down to this distance,
allowing it to remain for about ten minutes. Then lower
down to the bottom of the tube a thermometer (which
has its degrees marked on its stem) by means of a string
until it rests upon the wool below. In the course of an
hour withdraw the thermometer quickly and read the
temperature.
NOMENCLATURE.
New methods and new processes introduce new names,
and ensilage has proved no exception to this. It may be
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ON ENSILAGE. 51
convenient to give here such names as have been adopted,
as well as some that have been proposed.
Sito—A pit, and, as now used, the receptacle for fodder
preserved by this process, whether above or below ground.
ENsILaGE—The method of saving fodder in silos ; also
the contents of a silo, or pitted fodder. In England this
is abbreviated to SILAGE, which is sometimes used in this
country, but it failed of adoption by the last Ensilage
Congress.
To Enstto—To place in a silo.
ENSILOER—One who ensiloes.
ENsILoED—Perfect participle of to ensilo.
ENsILOING—Present participle of to ensilo.
The substitution of silage for ensilage would be conyve-
nient, leaving ensilage to indicate the system of preserv-
ing fodder. The matter was discussed at the last Ensilage
Congress, the chief objection to silage being that it was
English. The Congress voted to retain ensilage to denote
both the system and the contents of the silo. Still, if it is
found more convenient, silage will come into general use.
THE CHAMPION SILO OF ENGLAND.
The Royal Agricultural Society of England was last
year commissioned by its President, Sir Massey Lopes, to
offer a prize of $500 for ‘‘the best silo in England
and Wales in actual work during the winter of 1885-86.”
In the competition for this prize there were no less than
thirty-seven silos, the result being that the prize was
awarded to Mr. John Morris, of Tutham Court, Madley,
Herefordshire, for the silo of which we give an illustra-
tion (fig. 20). In their report to the Royal Agricultural
Society, the judges give a capital description of this silo.
It is an entirely new structure, thirty-six feet in length,
fifteen feet in width, and thirteen feet in height, with a
ENSILAGE.
SILOS AND
92
‘OTIS NOIANWVHO—'0Z “SL
Ws
=
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ON ENSILAGE. 93
super silo or shed above, seven feet in height to the eaves
of the roof. The silo may be described as an underground
silo, walled in with stone, and excavated ten feet deep, the
surrounding ground being banked up three feet to the
top. On the coping are built ten brick piers, seven feet
in height, and upon these the roof is supported. The silo
is divided by two cross walls into three compartments. In
these walls are planked openings, affording ready commu-
nication from one compartment to the other. There is
a third opening in the front wall. The middle compart-
ment, which is approached from the farm-yard by a
walled, sloping road, wide enough for a cart to pass along.
The cost of building this silo amounted to one hundred
and two pounds, eighteen shillings and eightpence, (five
hundred and fourteen dollars and fifty-six cents), the
cost being moderate, and amounting to only fourteen
shillings (three dollars and fifty cents) per fifty cubic feet
of capacity. The silo was filled in fourteen days, during
which time the weather was superb. The crop consisted
of oats and grass, cut in full bloom, and unchaffed. The
pressure adopted was that of men and horses first tread-
ing down the contents, and then continued pressure by
leverage. The ensilage was found good and sweet, and was
well utilized. The silo is in close proximity to the cattle
folds, where some hundred head of pure bred Herefords
are kept. There were about one hundred and fifty tons
of ensilage made in this silo, and the whole has been
eaten by the Herefords without the slightest waste. The
silo has thus proved a success in every way.
0. JUDD CO., DAVID W. JUDD, Pres't,
Catp—S——% PUBLISHERS AND IMPORTERS OF 5>——_SC«;.
All Works pertaining to Rural Life.
751 Broadway, New Worl.
Valuable and Standard Works.
Sent Post-paid om Ereceipt of Price.
FARM AND GARDEN.
Allen, R. L. and L. F. New American Farm Book.............
Barry, P. The Fruit Garden. New and Revised Edition...........
Brackett. Farm Talk. Paper 50c. Cloth.................... een
Brill. Farm-Gardening and Seed-Growing... 1... 2.2.22. cececeeee A
ee MORTON EIS Bo oa cine Sis Ss Roe LR REEL Lt ea
Broom-Corn and Brooms, Paper ..........--ccececee ceeces
Curtis on Wheat Culture. Paper.....................-2 2200.
Farm: Conveniences ::...2:. 3.0. 53 Assn cc eee
Farming for Protit:.:. 254.00.) 52s asceenassaeuas eee
Fitz. Sweet Potato Colture.; Paper. 2. 2 <2 2 bieeee. ect
Fink. Culture. Pave «5s ee eee eee
Frenen. 7 arm: Dranace xcs. ocs ee cov dee vedo eee
Fuller, A. §. Practical Forestry Vb a stele enleteie aalad ae eae ee ee
Gregory. On eabheees an iniy niein miatetne, pnb alc'p qe ely et eile, ips wie ile al ee
—- On Fertilizers Snialeyele WOOV ate, bo elein elas 1a Sieleiega idle atts iat en eae
===. On Onion Raising io. it Wiki 2 eo eee ME
wees, (ON SQURSNES Foo. s shacks carvan comwen oases ss ee ee
Harlan. Farming with Green Manures...... Sele cle serene
Harris, Joseph. Gardening for Young ad Olas, os ees
Talks on Manures. New and Revised Hdition...
Henderson, Peter. Gardening for Pleasure................... «-
—— Gardening for “Profits, . o.cc 7.0. ase eee
Henderson & Crozier. How the Farm Pays....................
Hop Culture. New and Revised Edition. Paper.... ........ 2...
Johnson, M. W. How to Plant. Paper..... 02.000) ..e eee. eee
Johnson, Prof. S. W. How Crops Feed ...................
—— How Crops Grow’ ocd ~ctseton ose kenene
Jones, B. W. The Peanut Plant. Paper..... Moats OUGEA Ce oo eee
Leland. Farm Homes, In-Doors, and Out-Doors. New Edition......
Long, Elias A. Ornamental Gardening for Americans .............
Oemiler. Truck-Farming at the South....... ... oe P¥ san bic ieee
Onions. How to Raise them Profitably............... .cc.0. 5 cance
Our Farm of Four Acres. Paper .............25 ceeeeeee oe be
Plant’ Life oh the Farmi..:.) <4. Sie. Arie eee
Quinn. Money in the Garden............ .. PETS OS eee
VALUABLE AND STANDARD WORKS.
Fey ie eet te Peataic Paper 255. wa hi ast ele oie is wi eee a woe one's
Roo; Piay and Prenat in:my Garden <2) sai Sse ssi ce ca eeee scecs
Moose VOlts..cr tre Acres Too Mach lo: il ise ha rsek ee ok dk ees
Silos and Ensilage. New and Enlarged Edition................
Stewart. Irrigation for the Farm, Garden, and Orchard....... .....
The Illustrated Dictionary of Gardening. Vol.1.
mee OF tine Fri: -: «.2.o2.0ce recline. :
Thomas. Farm Implements and Machinery rea agen ed woe Wwe
Tim Bunker Papers; or, Yankee Farming ... .......
Tobacco Culture. Paper LPS fy eee Wig aes ae ee Se ee ee
Warington. Chemistry of the Farm .............. 00... eee e eee eee
Wetiite. Gardening for the Souths. 625 ic.c.-s. scx. acs cacecec.cccceds
FRUITS, FLOWERS, ETC.
American re PIE oor nee ahs hee Senos cee
American Weeds and Useful Plants.......... .... ae
Boussingault. WeWbal MCGHONNyr et ch... cies feelin ee ee eee dee act
Chorlton. Grape-Grower’s Guide..... ..:...0........ 000. ee cece eee
Collier, Peter. Sorghun, its Culture and Manufacture.............
Downing. Fruits and Fruit Trees of Amcrica. New Edition.... ...
DSETITAIETIRSAYS< «). 55 seis oo taciie auc cipe oye aye shion aul oce were
Elliott. Hand Book for Fruit-Growers. Paper 60c. Cloth.... ... ...
Pater. me 5. otipe Cilinrist. oc. ne ee ean cen ne
sa Dilustrated Strawberry Culturist .... 6... 0. oo.
oe Small Fruit Culturist. New Edition..................
Fulton. Peach Culture. New and Revised Edition. ..................
Henderson, Peter. Hand Book of Plants... 2..0005 600. st awe
—— PPachied SMlGrirCHiteG css. iio santos cee woe
Hibberd, Shirley. The Amateurs Flower Garden... s.. *S245..-.
The Amateur’s Greenhouse and Conservatory.
——— The Amalen’s RUSC BOOK: ; +s cal cee. oom sees
Hoopes. Book of Evergreens.. ............. ce1e eee cess eee eee ees
Husman, Prof. Geo. Amcrican Grape growing and Wine Making
Johnson, Winter Greeneries at Home..................... eee eee ee
My Vineyard eae ACES WY os oan tink aisoreetone sees ssw neds Shes
Pa SO Souci MeOSG™ uv i eaileic neta ss veh tcetetadeccces esas
Quinn. Pear Culture for Profit. New and Revised Edition...........
EG oT Se OS a eer
Robinson. Ferns in their Homes and Ours....................... =,
Sheehan, Jas. Your Plants. Paper........... ..-...-.--..-.-0
Thomas. American Fruit Culturist..... 2. 22... Me page be wans t hegeak
Warder. Hedges and Evergreens ............. ae tae Boece
Webb, Jas. Cape Cod Cranberries. Paper, .......................
RE ae re re a td oe ooo cdot wa cans one cane careers as tne
POULTRY AND BEES.
Cooper Dr. J. W. Gane Vowls 0.02.0 0...4... 05-22:
Rewis,) practical: Pouliry Bookiiiic, wei ced - ce cence Re | eget
Poultry. Breeding, Rearing, Feeding etc. Boards Arg Me
Profits in Poultry and their rent bie Manage-
ment. Most complete Work extant.. Nii rie Rays oa
m
VALUABLE AND STANDARD WORKS.
Quin by. Mysteries of Bee-Keeping Explained (Edited by L. C. Root), 1.50
Standard Excellence in Poultry...-......... .......-...... 1.00
Stoddard. A» Evg-Farm. Revised and Enlarged.................... -50
Wrignt. PracticalsPoultry-Keeper. 5 ticccs0 eae oee eee es eee eee 2.00
CATTLE, SHEEP, AND SWINE.
Allen, L. F. American Cattle. New and Revised Edition........... 2.50
Armatage, Prof. Geo. Every Man His Own Cattle Doctor. 8vo.. 7.50
Cattle. The Varicties, Breeding, and Manavement.................... MS
Coburn, F. D. Swine Husbandry. New ana Revised Edition...... gi)
Dadd, Prof. Geo. H. American Cattle Doctor, 12mo............ 1.50
American Cattle Doctor. 8vo. Cloth...... 2.50
Guenon, \OnMilch Cows: 2.6.5. sR soso ee occas gelatine 1.00
Harris, Joseph. Once Biges.. sek ae this SA ates te coco ee pee 150
Kecping One Cow: -) 2... 4.. 5 fe. ie ests eee 1.00
Martin, R. B. Wog-Raising and Pork-Making............ ....... .40
Powers, Stephen. The American Merino for Wool and Mutton.
A practic: and ‘valuable worlies (oe ae. ain. 5 seats ie ae on poe 1.75
Quincy, Hon. Josiah. On Soiling Cattle............ eee. 1.25
Randall... Fine Wool Sheep Husbandry.) e204 soos eames ee eee 1.00
———— Practical Sheplierds: Fy ..ice owas ci divc eds Soda. Bele ee 2.00
Sheepsushandiyys rie oo asec eh oleae aoe oles Se vee 1.50
Stewart, Henry. Shepherd's s Manual. New and Enlarged Edition. i. bebe
Stewart, E. W.° Feeding Animals” .. 2... 2.05. ons cee! se nae 2.00
MISCELLANEOUS.
Allen, LiF Boral Architectare. 0 7.2i552.59020) eugsnone aeeee 1.50
Barn Plans and Out-Buildings....... ................... 1.50
Bamford, ©. E.: ,dilk Caltare. 5... 0.2 ens aan Oe Pe eee -30
Bommer. Method of Making Manures .........................-00- 25
Emerson and Flint. Manualof Agriculture.... .... ....... .. 1.50
Homes for Home Builders. Just Published. Fully Illustrated. 1.50
Long. Ornamental Gardening for Americans...................4. 2.0. 2.00
Lynnde, Elmer. The Model Cook............ 02... 22... see... 1.00
Reed: Cottage Wousts: i snc oe 5, wit opaeg Morel sal Siarchers re tanta ea sajsmees 1.25
—— “House Plans for Everybody. 3. 7 <..5.0 cies. ves os skies oe
a, AV CLM GSS i2.c) Fags Hei e Ba ete iow Gare GRIST OIE: Ole cer ae ora ae 3.00
Smith, George Putnam. The Law of Field SON A Sum-
mary of the Rules of Law cffecting American Sportsmen........... 1.00
Treat. Injurious Insects of the Farm and Garden........ SR eonoror es cell,
Weidenmann. Peautifying Country Homes. A eapecane aris Vol. 10.00
Wingate, Geo. W. Through the Yellowstone Park on Horseback.
Very copiously illustrated.) -12mo.s <0 siieacc waits ceclanee = ern 1.50
Send Postal for Catalogue of our 200 Publications regarding Horses
and Horsemanship, Hunting, Fishing, and all other Out-Door Sports
and Pastimes.
0. JUDD CO., DAVID W. JUDD, Pres't.
751 BROADWAY, NEW YORK.
Ill
item
i ie
i} anit
| Bt
A
a
if i | |
\ “ul
Ws
il i
util
ng “Ni
44
i
i
I
ine
ills
ij! i]
nt ae i
Pa
|
a
is
Hi wil 2 3 o |
AY Aa it i hh
4 itt | Nd Hii
i fai ? vot ft
ah ™
tau
| S30
Le ‘ ‘ |
| Ris We i us HV eo i i \
\ ee Mi
hy
Al
Hit
ni
ae nih ify tn in
AK x bar Fal (i a hil Hi ul
w is il ii ‘i |
en Hy)
My
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
ADAIR
UOOL4Sagsz,