SEASONAL VARIATIONS in
TOXICITY of BUTTER CLAMS
from SELECTED ALASKA
BEACHES
I Marine Biological L-;- •■ ,:i
LIBRARY
OCT 2 31950
WOODS HOLE, MASS.
SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT: FISHERIES No. 53
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Ibcplanatory Kot©
The serias embodies results of inTestigatioiiB, xiraally of
restrictad seeps, iateaded to aid or dire^st management or
■a.tilisatioa. practicss and as guides for almiaistrative cr
IsgislatiYe action.. It is issued in limited qTsantities for the
offic'la3. use of Jsdjeral, State or cooperating agencies and in
processed form for eeoaomy and to avoid delaj in pablication..
United St-ates Department of the Intarior
Oscar Ip Ciiapman, Secretary
Fisli and Wildlife Serwice
Albert M. Day, Directed
Special Scientific. Sepcr*. =■ Pisheries
No. 53
SEASOUAL YAEIATIONS IN TOXICITY OF BUTTER CLAMS
PSOM SELBGTED ALASKA BEACHES
By J&im S. Chasnibers a^d
Harris W, Magnassoa
* Chemist, Branch of Commercial Fisheries
** Chemist, Branch of Commercial Fisheries, formerly Fishery-
Products Laboratory , Ketchikan, Alaska, now Fishery
Technological Laboratory, Boston, Massachusetts
Washingtoa, D. C,
August 1950
Introduction
The iRV3S3tigai;ion of paralytic sbsllfish poison in the clams of
Sou'Hheastera Alaska condacted hy the Jish&rj Products LahoratoTy,
Zet'Shikan,!,' was diTidsd into threa main projects. The one with which
this t^por'!-. is con^tseraed '.b the geographical and seasonal distrihution of
th(9 taxltL in Vattes' clams, Saridonriis giganta'^is. The other two projects,
the study of toxin reduction "by processing methods and the study of sampling
aaid testing methods, are to he reported in separate papers. Batter clams
aae the most important ■scmmercial cleun resource in Southeastern Alaska,
IHherafcre, the swdies were devoted almost entirely to this species.
InTestigations of an exploratory Qatu:re performed from 19*46 to
19^8 established the presence of toxin in hutter clams from many of the
Southeastern Ala^ska clam prod-^cing "beaches during all seasons,
ProiE May 19^ to September 19^, inclusive, a systematic monthly
saTiPDling of representatiTe areas on certain eommercially exploitable clam-
produsing beaches was carried out. The purposes of the survey were to
determine the monthly fluct'iations in the toxicity of the clams from the
different areas and the variation in tcxicity between the siphon and the
body. InformatioiS. on ^-hese factors is essential for intelligent regu-
r.ation of this fishery and enables the processor to eliminate a major
so-oree of tox5.3. fr:*!!! the canned product.
Collection of Glam Samples
^e laboratory motor vessel Be searcher, usually operated by a
cr?w of three men, was tised in collecting the clam samples. Shucking of
the clams and preparation of the extracts were performed aboard the boat,
A wi.de knowledge of the elam beds in Southeastern Alaska, gained
froas the earlier gensral survey work, made it possible to select 10
s-epresentativs .^iam beaches on which were laid out 22 plots. Nine of the
■jeaches were knows t-5 produce clams of fairlj!" high toxicity; whereas, the
A-emalni-xig gzl? yielded ciams of low toxicity. Preliminary tox5.city tests
o^a man^' individaal clams from a single plot showed that there was con-
siderable ?a,riatiers. in toxicity between clams. Tb.ese tests further showed
that resul'.ts si^ificant wit'hia plus or minus 30 percent could be obtained from
a sajiiple of 25 clams. Therefore, the plots were made large enou^ to
supply at least 18 samples of 25 clams each. To provide a thoroughly repre-
ssiatati?© sample, not oT<^r 3 clams were taken from each hole dog, and the
holes were distributed well over the entire plot. All the study plots were
iatmdatsd at hi^. '^ater and comrpletely exposed only at a minus tide. The
c'sllections were made, weathjer permitting, during one of the minus tide
periods each month.
1/ Jointly operated by vhe Alaska fisheries Experimental Commiasion and
the U. S. Pish and Wildlife Service.
Ezt-racting and Testing Procgdure
lEie clama were opened with a siiacking knife while they were still
alive „ The shucked olaras were washed in fresh water to remove all foreign
par'iicles from the tissues, and then drair;.ed. The entire siphon (neck) was
severed from the Isody, and the siphons and bodies were treated separately.
These were minced using a hand operated mea's chopper. The ground material
was mixed ihoroughly, and to 100 grams of the minced material was added
100 milliliters of 0„I2 N hydrochloric acid (l part concentrated hydrochloric
acid to 99 parts distilled water). This mixture was boiled for 5 minutes
while baing stirred continuously. After cooling, the mixture was brought
to its original volume by the addition of distilled water. A portion of
the final mixture was bottled and stored in the ice box of the vessel until
the boat returned to Zetchikan, At the laboratory the pH of the extract
was determined with a pH meter, and, when necessary, it was adjusted to a
range of pH 4.0 to 4.5 by adding 5 N hydroch].oric acid or 0.1 H sodium
hydroxide. The extract was centrifuged, and the supernatant liquid was
placed in vials and stored at 0° to 3^ 0, until tests were performed.
The extracts were tested on white mice which weighed between 15
aaid 25 grams. The mice, obtained from a supplier in California, were a
mixture of two strains. Thsy were shipped air espress and arrived at the
laboratory in good eonditioao
The extracts were injected intraperitoneally by means of a two
milliliter insulin syringe. The smallest practicable needle (27 gauge)
was used to redu'je leakage from the puncture. The voliane of extract
injected into each ro.ouse was varied according to the wei^t of the mouse,
One^twentieth of a milliliter of the extract - or diluted extract - for each
gram of live weight was used» This procedure was found to be more satis-
factoiy than the injection of a standard amount of extract and the ajjplication
of a correction factor based on the weight of the mouse.
The lethal time was computed, in seconds, from the time that one-
half of the volume of extract had been injected until the mouse took its
final normal, rhythmic breath. This time of death, in almost every case,
was accoarpanied by a complete relaxation of the body, followed by a series
of reflex motions varying in intensity and duration. When necessary, with
the highly toxic materials, the extracts were diluted so that the lethal
time exceeded four minutes.
A table based on the toxicity curve of Sommer and Meyer (1937) was
used to convert the lethal time to toxicity of the injected solution. The
tonicity of the liaw material, expressed as mouse units per 100 grams of raw
materia],, was calcolated by applying the appropriate dilution factors, A
morise unit (MU) has been defined as that amount of injected shellfish poison
that kills a 20 gram mouse in 15 minutes (Sommer, et al., 1948), Since
Sommer and Meyer (1937) constructed their cui've from data obtained from
mussels, a 3im3.1ar cur^e Tas developed from data obtained using butter clam
extracts. A conrparison of the two carves demonstrated that the data
reported for masael extracts cauld te used satisfactorily la the clam
toxicity assay.
At leasi threa mice were aaed to assay each extract. Bxtensive
test8» had prowA iha.t reaultiB based on the use of three mice gav© an
accuracy of better ihaTj. plas er minus iiZ percent. Errors due to variatioas
in the mice, techxdqo© of iajection, and determination of death-times were
reduced hy rejection of IndiTfldiiml assay results differing from the average
by more than one- third.
Loeatioa of KLots
The locations of the teaches and the distribution of the plots
were based on extensive knowledge of the clam beds in Southeastern Alaska,
acquired from the general surrey. Sfine beaches which past experience had
shown would yield highly toxic clamSp at least during some periods of the
year, and one beach which had yielded essentially non-toxic clams, wer®
selected. These beaches were distributed over as wide an area as it was
practical to v3.sit fraqusntly with the laboratory's motor vessel.
It is to be noted that none of the beaches chosen was from so-
called outside waters, sine® preTicus investigation had shown that clams
from those areas were relatively aon-toxie. However, all the beaches
studied were on fairly wide channels which communicate directly with the
ocean. !Ehe plots wer© on ^.laro I'eds near the mouths of bays or passages
which wer© readily affectisd by the iinirrents in the large channels. None
of the plots was located near the head of a bay or inlet, fhroughout the
entire clam research program it was found that clams decreased in toxicity
as the sampling continf^d toward the head of the bays.
From one to three plots were laid out in each of the ten areas
selected for study. The plois war® outlined by four iron stakes bearing
metal tags stamped with the alphabetic designation of the plot. The 22
plots wer© lettered, A throtigh T, beginning with a beach near Ketchikaa
and ending with a location in Frederick Sound. Locations, descriptions
and characteristics of th© st-ady plots are detailed in Table 1,
The ■onfavora'tel© weather during the winter months and the
considerable distance of some of the beaches from Ketchikan made it
impossible to ob'sain a coarplete sequence of data from each plot. This wais
especially tsTi© in regard to the more northerly plots in Chatham Strait,
Fort-gnately, it was possible to obtain fairly complete data from plots
near Ketchikan,
Plot 0 was ©mitted after October because the float at Fanshaw,
which was the oa3.y safe anchorage in foul weather, was destroyed by a
storm.
E/Unpublished data of report in preparation.
Table i. - "psNTir '.cavjon A^e: D£s::Rip~iCN of ~h£ stuov plo's
Terrain SlopeI/ Area 2/
Plot
locatjcn
Ham 'sland
S° II' 541^ N
I3r 23' lO* V»
Sre
WtS" SIDE OF THE NOR'.'HERN TIP OF H.AM GRAVEL
■ SLAND „ (ttCNfi THE NARRCW PASSAGE CON- SAND
NE<r~!NG' CSBCAOE :i^E" WITrt R£V|L:^dlGEDO SHELL
Channel .
Yards
Sharp »0x3
Ham Island
55° n' 45" N
131° 23' 11" W
SOUnflOEST OF PLO" Aj IMMET ;A-e_r NORTH GRAVEL
0|- A PCIN' rORMING THE HAM ISLAND SIDE SAM3
OF THE NARROWEST PART OF THE PASSAGE. SHELL
Sharp jex4
ANNETTE Island
55° II' 4T N
I3|0 23' 2Cy W
A::RCSS ^'HE PASSAGE, NORTHWEST 0^ PLOT B,
MS" WES~ OF ^'fC ROCKY PO«NT FORMINQ THE
AnNE^'I ':S_AN0 SjDE OF "HE NARROWEST
POIlvr «N "H~ PASSAGE,
Gravel
SHELL
Gentle i ix7
Dall Bav On a s.ngle reef, awash at high "ide, in
55° 09' OE" N Dal_ BaVj Gravina 's^-ANO, westward of the
I3l° 43' 55" W NORTH END OF THE LARGE a.AND X" DALL
Bay, Plot was on the sumvi" o:~ a wash
LYiNG N0RT;SEAST 8V SOUTHWEST ON EASTERN
EN3 OF THE REEF.
Gravel
Sand
Shell
Moderate iOx5
E
Dall Bay
^0 ogt ufcT N
I3l° 43' b/"* W
OAVEST SIDE OF SAME REEF AS PLOT Do
SAND
Shell
Boulders
Gentle
8x8
F
Carlton Island
^° 54' S" N
132° 22' 00* W
On a CONSPICUOUS whce beach, on north-
easy SIDE OF TOE ISJ.ANO,
Gravel
Shell
Sharp
M)6
G
Carlton Island
55° 54' 50» N
132° 21' 50" W
Midway between PuO" F apc southeastern
point of the islando
Sand
Shell
Boulders
Moderate
I8xi0
H
Carlton Island
55r 54' 30» N
132 22' 00» W
On a FLATs EXPOSED AT MPNL'S -;CE, BE-
TWEEN Carlton and Onslcw Sri.ands, ano
JoST NORrHEAST OF "HE HIGHEST' POINT ON
THE RIDGE OF ROCKS R;SING FROM THE FLAT.
Gravel
Sand
SHR.L
Boulders
NEAR:>.Y
LEVEL
I5xi4
1
WRANGELL
Narrows
56° 49' 20^ N
132° 56' 4a« W
On MiThOF SSLAInC, -AS" INSIDE NORTHERN
ENTRANCE TO THE NARROWS^ DIRECTi-Y EAST
OF Flashing Red Buov No, 42.
Gravel
Mud
Boulders
Sharp
15x5
J
San Juan
Island
57° 17' 35» N
1340 00' bU* W
At eimtrance to Pybus Bav, 0.8 mile
SOUTHWES-WARO OF PoiNT PYBUS, ADMIRALTY
iSt-AND. AT MINUS TiDE THE VWO ISLANDS
ARE CON^ECT£C BY A GRAVEL BAR A" THEIR
WESTERN ENDS. PLO" _IES BETWEEN ROCICV
OtrCROPPINGS, FORMING A POCKS'", AT
SOUTHWEST END OF NORTHERN ISLAND, ON
TnE EAST OR FREDERICK SOUfC SIDE OF THE
GRAVEL BAR.
Gravel
Sand
Shell
B0Ua)ERS
Over
BEDROCK
Moderate
10x5
K
San Juan
Island
57° i7' 35" N
f34° 00' 55* W
U'tMM' OiM EAST SIDE OF GRAVEL BAR,
IMMEO'.ATELY SOUTH OF A WELL-DEFINED
SANDY AREA,
Gravel
Sand
Shell
bouuders
GENTuE
22x6
L
San Juan
island
57" 17' 37" N
134° 01' 10^ W
On WEST OR UP-BAY SIDE OF QrAvE. BAR,
NEAR WES^ END OF SOUTH IS_AND IN A
POCKE" FORMED BY THE GRAVEL BtH ANO A
SMAl^ SEEF.
Gravel
Sand
Boulders
Over
bedrock
Gentle
12X5
Pt2L.
TABLE I. - ! PEWIT JFICAT! ON WD DF.Si;RiPr|ON CF "WE SrCfJCV PLOTS ( CONTINUED)
LOCAT ! ON
Sme
TERRaTn S^0P£.I,/ AreST*
RoBERvs Island
57" |8' 06" N
isa** 27* 5(y W
On LAWJEsr OF Roberts .slancs which form the GRAvtit.
souw poitr AT Ti-e entrance to Port Houghton, Sand
WHICH MAK?:S OF- "ROM STEPHENS PASSAGE, PLOT SHELL
WAS ON *ES" OR Stephen? ['Assage side of a Small
sp«T coN^ecTl^a eastern end of thjs island to rocks
A WOOOED islet JMMEOlATELy TO THE SOUTH,
GENTLE
YAR03
|QX8
ROBER-rS I3LAM3
57^ tS' 00" N
133° 27 « 3G" W
Tanshaw
57" l3» 00" h
133^ 30« lO" W
On east or up-ba*
FROM Blot m.
S DG C"^ ""HE SPIT ACROSS
On mainlan;; a~ sou-t-WERN em? of Cleveland
Passage p vshkh lies between MAiNL.ANt) and
WH ! rUSf i SL AMD „ PLOT WAS APPROX I MATELY
lOOO YARDS i\!i-:^''1-W£S" 0." FANSHAW POS"' 0FT!:E.
Was DISC0NTI(>iUE& AFTER OCTOBER BECdJLSE OF
WSAFE -ANCHORAGE If^ FOX WHATWEP,
Gravel
Saw
Shell
Gentle
12x7
Gravel
Mud
Boulders
Gentle
20x7
CHAJK BA';'
57'^ 13" SS'* N
134® 33' 40" W
LEDGE 0,5 MSLE FROW NOP".'>< SHORE OF GRAVEL
,ASE Poiiv; ;, Admiralt!' Saw
SLA^Ei, PLOT WAS OM SOt^HEASTT OR LP=BA^' SHELL
SIDE OF THE LEDGEo
On a baR(
Chaik Bay, snsioe Vi
Plot
Moderate
13x5
Chaik Ba?
134'^ 33' 50" W
Hoco Bav"
^■0 2g« 35^ M
134° 32» 55" W
On Cha-^am S^'rait sine of ledge across from
Plot P» betweei*. rockv owreRoppiNGSo
Gravel
Sand
Boulders
On east side of T^e southern end a^ Sa;^' Gravel
5SLANO5 which' is a SMAuX. I slaw QfT' the east SA(\!D
shore of Hood Bav, Admiralt'v Island, and Shell
^ol"'.' i„5 mules southeasir o'f kllliswoo bouloers
)3la)«„ plot was on east end of a y=3hapec
ii/AShu
Gentle
l7xi{
GENTLE
9X7
s
Hooo Bay
57=^ 26'
134^^ 33«
35" N
tO" W
On WES" EM) OR Cha'tham Strait s'oe of the '^'-
SHAPED WASH 5 ON S^XT^€RM END Ot^ SANO 1 SLAP® 5
ACROSS ?^ROM Plot R„
SANTj
Shell
Gentle
13x6
T
Hooo Bax'
57*^ 26'
,340 329
25» H
55" W
On ENC in- SOtiTK ARM OF THE Y-SHaPED WASH.,
BETWEEN Plots R and S on southern po\nt of
Sand l3LA^f>,
Gravel
Sand
Shell
Gentle
8x8
U
SECURITY
Bay
On reef, awash at high tjde. ojs" west of
MUD
Gentle
5xiO
56" 50' 4S»' N
134*- 20' lO" W
SHAL^OWBIGhT ON VCST SIDE OF C;.Err ISLAI®, SHELL
liM Security Bay, ku:'.i sLA^c. Plot was on Over
east end of a depression bisecting t!-c reef, bedrock
Has an c-OuR of wdrogen suvpkide.
Security Bav
56* 51' oOf" N
134° 2J' CS" W
On the east s jde near the southern end of
Harbor fsLANo, which is norhtwest of Cleft
Island, in SEcuRir? Bay,
GRAVEL
Banc
Boulders
GENTLE
8x6
Sharp Slope i
Moderate Slcpe;
Gentle Slope %
fi. drop of II FOCI IN lO FEET,
A DROP OF i FOOT IN 25 FEET,
A drop of I FOOT l^^ 4C' FEET.
gf Area; first figure is distance parallel to water's eosEo
Digcru-ssion of Egperimeatal Besults
The res-alts of the monthly toxicity tests for each plot are
presented in Tahle 2, The data represent the "ioiicity in mouse xmits per
100 grams of siphons or hodies. The graphic interpretation of this
information is shown in Figures 1 to 9. The toxicities of "bodies ajid siphons
from the same sample have been placed in the same figure. Toxicity cTorres
from plots in the same locality have "been combined in one figure.
The plots studied were typical of the clam beds in Southeastern
Alaska in terrain and clam population. However, as was mentioned previously,
nine of the plots were located on beaches of known high toxicity in order
to provide clams containing determinable quantities of toxin •!;hroughout
the year. This was done so that any fluct'jations in toxicity could be
determined from mo::ith to month.
The reactions of the mice which died when injected with the
extracts of clam materials (either bodies or siphons) were identical to the
reactions described for deaths due to the injection of mussel poison. Two
investigators who had worked extensively with mussel poison confirmed this
observation. In post-mortem examinations immediately after death, the
chambers of the heart were noted to beat rhythmically; this so-called heart
block is a characteristic of mussel poisoning.
The seasonal toxicity characteristics of butter clams are very
definitely different from those of mussels, Rytilus calif omi anus , and
Washington clams, Saxidomus nuttallii. of California (Sommer and Meyer 1937)
and of mussels, Rytilus edulis„ and soft shell clams, Mva arenaria„ of New
Brunswick (Medcof, et al,, 19^7). Studies of the California and New
Brunswick species indicate that there are short periods in the summer months
when they become highly toxic. The toxicity increases rapidly and then
diminishes rapidly within a few weeks. During the winter months these
species are normally relatively free of ^oxln. In the present survey,
except for Plot I, which had relatively non-toxic clams throughout the year,
the butter clams from all the beaches showed some degree of toxicity at
every saurpling.
Prom a study of dino flagellates in these waters made dij.ring the
sunmier of 19^9, the report of which has not yet been published,-*^ it is
known that dinoflagellates of the genus (jop3^u1£lx. a member of which is the
causative organism of mussel poison, do abound in the waters along the
Alaskan beaches studied.
The toxicity of the siphons was regularly much greater than that
of the bodies. However, the ratio of toxicities of siphons to bodies is
not constant. The toxicity of the siphons varies greatly from month to
month, while the toxicity of the bodies does not display a similar degree
of change. The ratio of the weight of siphons to bodies depends upon the
care with which the siphons are removed. The data from three laboratory
2J A study of diaoflagellates in the waters of Southeastern Alaska
carried out by Lucile Foster of the George Williams Hooper Foundation
In cooperation with the Fieheiy Products Laboratory,
experiments using 25 clams eacla show that the siphons were Ik, J to l6,4
percent of the total clam meats, Vhe eijhons were cut from the bodl©«
after the manner of commercial ahucking, ia which appioximately j/h of
the siphon is remoTed. In two additional experiments usiag 25 clams each,
the entire siphons were pulled from the bodies. Separated in this manner,
the siphons constituted 18.5 to 19.9 percent of the total clsun meats. In.
a semi-commercial operation in which 290 bushels of clams were shucked raw
hy a rega].ar shucking crew, who were instructed to cut off all the siphoa
carefully, the siphons were 18.5 percent of the total clam meats. The
£?paration of the siphons in the present- survey followed the latter method,
The resu3.ts of the sur&'ey do not show uniformity in the fluctu-
ation of toxicities of the clams. Brsn those from plots in the same
locality do not always display the sasne vrend.
There is no eTident correlation between the degree of toxicity
and the terrain of the "beach, the magaife^■^.de of the tides, tenrperat'ire of
the water, or amount of daylight. However, the data do suggest a recurring
fluctuation in the toxicity during the year.
Goaclugjoas
A l6 month survey of representative clam beds in Southeastern
Alaska verifies the earlier findings that a toxin or toxins, which cause
reactions in mice similar to those produced by toxin frequently present in
mussels (paralytic shellfish poison), is present In the butter clams of
Southeastern ^aska frosa certain areas during every month,
The toxicity of the siphons is usually several times greater than
that of the bodies.
The toxicity of the bodies does not vary greatly from month to
month, while the toxicity of the siphons shows marked fluctuations.
Literature Cited
MEDCOr, J. C; LEIM, A. H, ; NEEULEE, AXPEEM B.; HEBULEH, A. W. H,;
GIBBAED, J,; and KAUBERT, J.
1947. Paralytic shellfish poisoning on the Canadian Atlantic coast.
Ball. Fish, Ees. Bd. Can., 21. PP. ^H, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada.
SOMMER, H. , and MBIEER, K, F,
1937. Paralytic shellfish poisoning. Arch. Path., 24, pp. 560-598,
Saja Francisco, California.
SOMMER, HEEMAM; HOMIER, ROBERT P.; BIEGEL, BTBON; STAEGER, D. WAEEBIT;
MOLD, JAMBS D. ; WIZHOLM, DOMLD M.; and ZIEALIS, ELIZABETH SHAME SY.
19^. Paralytic shellfish poison. I. occurrence and concentration
by ion exchange, Joor, Amer, Chem, Soc, 22.* PP» 1015-1018.
Table 2, - monthly toxicity survet cf bltter clam samples from plots on
selected sou^heasterm a_aska btaocs
PLOT
rjo.
LOCATION
TOXICiTY,
May" (946
IN MOLSE UNr,-S PER iCO GRAMS_ OF_MeAT_
July
19^
At.Gi« 1948
Sept. i948
Bodies Sjphcns Boo.es Sjdhck's Boc.es Siphons Bogies Siphons
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
M
N
0
P
R
S
T
U
V
Ham tsLAi>o
Ham Island
Annette Island
Dall Bay
Oa».l Bay'
Carlton Islatc
Carlton island
Carlton Island
Petersburg
P-/BUS Bay
PvBus Bay
Pybus Bay
Roberts Island
Roberts Island
Fanshaw
Chaik Bay
Chaik Bay
Hood Bay
Hood Bay
Hood Bay
Security Bay
Security Bay
1,200
1,500
2,700
2,400
1,700
1,300
1,200
1,200
200
1,900
1,300
540
2lO
3,500
2,700
4,600
2,900
4,900
3,200
2,900
Lost
2,;ioo
2,000
!80
6,200
6,700
2.600
2,100
6,300
7,900
2,400
1,400
i„aoo
2,100
3,200
800
950
660
NEG.
1,100
1,300
620
1. 800
2,600
1,900
760
350
l„lC0
530
370
23,000
13,000
24„000
17,000
13,000
6,400
3.100
2,900
220
9,200
14,000
14,000
17,000
4,700
5,4(X)
13,000
11,000
16,000
6,700
5,000
3,800
790
1,600
2,600
1,600
•,|00
460
830
930
1,400
1,100
900
2,300
1,400
1,800
520
440
630
470
580
620
28,000
18,000
25,000
14,000
11,000
3,600
3,600
4,100
230
21,000
14,000
14,000
17,000
5,700
10,000
22,000
K,000
9,100
7,400
7,000
5,600
9,100
1,300
1,000
630
MEG,
960
1,300
1,200
660
3,200
1,900
940
360
7lO
900
350
'360
5lO
6,200
3,700
3,500
2l0
)2,0C0
10,000
t5,0C0
(3,000
15,000
12,000
17,000
7,200
11,000
4,900
5,000
7,000
13.000
A
B
C
D
C
"F
6
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
Table 2„ - monthly toxi
ICITY SURVEY OF BUTTER CLAM SAMPLES i
FROM PLOTS ON
SELECTED Southeastern Alaska beaches -
Continued
Location
BODIES
Toxic iTv„
1948
.IN MOUSE UNITS PER lOO GS,
ftMS OF MEAT
Plot
NOV. 1948
DE.
Bodies
:. 1948
Siphons
Jan,
Bodies
1949 .
No.
S:phons
Bodies Siphons
S 1 PHONS
Ham island
Ham Island
AN^€TTE Island
Dall Bay
Dall Bay
Carlton Island
Carlton Island
Carlton Islaio
Petersburg
Pybus Bay
Pybus Bay
f*«Bws Bay
Roberts Island
ftoBERTS Island
Fanshaw
Chaik Bay
Chaik Bay
Hooo Bay
Hood Bay
Hood Bay
Security Bay
Security Bay
2,500
1,600
2,000
1,100
1,000
780
Neg.
I„l00
2,000
1,300
1,700
3,900
1,600
760
400
1,100
590
860
I.JOO
1,000
5,100
5^700
4,900
6,500
4,300
Lost
220
(9,000
13,000
(7,000
18,000
16,000
13,000
14,000
5,900
9,500
7,900
8,300
13,000
13,000
l»700
3,600
670
970
8=0
NEG,
760
840
930
1,500
1,-00
Omitted
1,400
920
780
2,600
3,400
1,000
1,200
970
12,000
5,800
6,900
(9,000
(2,000
6,600
1,600
550
1,000
2,300
3,(00
4,(00
4,800
5,400
16,000
!,600
1,100
2,lC0
2lO = '- NEG,
((,000 ...
(0,000
11,000
(8,000 ...
8,700 ...
FROM FURTHER SAMPLING AFTER OCTOBER
(9,000
11,000
(8,000
14,000
(2,000
2lO
8lO
400
3,000
6,200
sel
ected South;
-.'STERN Alaska beaches
- CONTINLIED
Locat ion
Toxicirf„
IN MOUSE UN
its per IOO grams Or
meat
Plot
Feb.
L949
MaRo 1949
Apr, I
1949
May
1949
No,
Bodies
Siphons
Bodies
Siphons
Bod.es
S 1 PHONS
Bodies
Siphons
A
Ham islwc
1,500
24,000
2,000
21,000
2,200
22,000
3,000
20,000
B
H.4tt Island
1,000
12,000
1,100
7,900
670
11,000
2,100
;J,CtX)
C
Annedt Island
!,|00
17,000
2,200
|9„000
1,300
|4,CC0
2,400
16,000
0
Oali. Bay
„
2,600
lO,(J00
3,500
13,000
E
DAf.L Bay
„
B
_
.
2,400
11,000
3,800
10,000
F
Carlton IsU(\)D
„
_
eTo
5,500
700
4,800
870
3,000
G
CARLTCV la^VND
_
_
l.lOO
4,400
1,400
4,700
630
4,200
H
Carlton island
-
»
650
3,200
■ Hon
3,900
690
3,700
1
PtTERSBLRS
_
.
NEGo
200
NEG.
200
NEG«
NEG.
J
PVBbS Bav
o
•
1,100
13,000
1,500
16,000
1,800
|6,U00
K
PyoUS Bay
.
_
1,300
8,300
(,600
to,uuu
1,700
9,600
L
PvBus Bay
•
»
1,300
12,000
920
11,000
l,4C0
14,000
M
Roberts island
-
.
1,600
15,000
1,200
14,000
1,400
11,000
N
RoBCR^s Island
-
-
2,600
16,000
3,200
13,000
2,300
9,200
0
Faims-ww
Omitted from further sampling
after 0;
:tober
P
Chaik Bay
_
_
640
10,000
700
11,000
590
8,30C'
Q
Chaix Bay
.
Cl
970
8,100
750
6,40C<
600
6,800
R
Hood Bav
•
o
1,100
11,000
540
3,300
680
9,500
S
Hood Bay
_
c
480
4,20)
760
5,800
660
4,200
T
Hood Bay
.
.
560
4,60C!
750
6,300
840
3,900
L!
SE'X'air.' Bav
c.
a
470
6,500
40*
5,600
240
3,900
V
SEouRtTv Bay
-
-
690
9,300
540
7,900
790
7,600
Tabu 2. - Monthly toxicity survey
of bltter -
CLAM SAMPLES
; from plots on
- Continued
selected Southeastern Alaska beacs^es
LOCAT ! ON
Toxicity.
IN MOUSE UN
l!TS PER lOO
grams 0-
MEAT
Plot
June 1949
July
1949
AUG,
1949
Sept
. 1949
No.
Bodies
Siphons
Bodies .
Siphons
Bodies
Siphons
12,000
Bodies
1,800
SIPHONS
A
Ham JsLAhc
.
.
1,400
|6,0CX)
2,100
13,000
B
Ham i3LA^e
„
o
620
5,600
1,500
7,900
1,500
ll.CXX)
C
Ammet""e Island
«
_
1,500
\l,CCO
2,700
12,000
1,900
(2,000
D
Dall Bay
„
_
o.
.
1,800
6,8CX)
1,900
9,700
E
Dail Bav
«
«
2,800
4,100
3,100
4,100
3,300
8,800
F
Carlton I slaw
2,100
5,500
1,600
7,5CX)
l,4C0
11,000
=
-
G
Carlton Island
1,300
5,400
1,800
LOST
1,400
7,600
-
-
H
Carltcn Island
1,000
3,400
Lost
8,300
l,40C.
13,000
-
=
1
PETtftSBURG
NEGo
NEG.
NEG.
NEG.
=
=
-
"
J
P-VBL'S BA?
1,400
|2,UU0
1,900
9, £00
l,l-X
7,300
=
=
K
Pybus Say
1,700
8,800
1,600
S,-500
IJOO
11,000
-
-
L
Pybus Bw
1,300
15,000
1,200
16,000
1,200
13,000
=
-
U
Roberts Island
1,900
10,000
2, AX)
14,000
1,100
I2,000
-
-
N
Roberts Island
2,000
13,000
2,500
14,000
1,400
9,700
-
-
0
F«*rvSnAw
Omitted from further sampling ArTER i
October
P
Chaik Bay
850
11,000
1,500
16,000
560
11,000
->
-
Q
Chaik Bay
760
7,700
1,200
9,603
750
10,000
-
-
R
Hood Bay
1,100
9,300
1,400
8,000
480
lljUUO
-
-
S
Hoo) Bay
800
6,500
1,100
9,600
580
6,500
o
-
T
Hood Bay
//U
4,800
1,000
8,100
280
5,000
-
m
U
SfeTij«i'.-Y Bay
760
5,200
1,200
10,000
350
6,600
-
-
V
Security bay
BlO
9,100
1,100
7,800
540
7,800
•
*
Figures 1 to 9 show graphically the monthly
variation in toxicity of the bodies and
siphons of buttex' clam samples from plots on
selected Southeastern Alaska beaches «
10
Interior-=-Duplioating Section, Washington, Do C<. 8276.3
4J
O
rH
ft
cd
o
i
m
«0 N CD
C«l CM —
iovui tiaft 001 J*tf
o u
a
<
€L
<
«
>
w
O
— ra
Pi
-I 1 1 »-
o
■4
«
N
-I »-
H h
-I 1 '
lo»ui lUiO 001 •>•' n H ipuotnoMl
N
« X
+
+
-t-
ir
•+-
-a
F-=4
to
o
a
m
M
C
o
H
a
o
to
O
n
M est — -• —
loaui tuiS 001 J*d n N tpuotnoqi
totui tuil 001 '•^ n N tpuoflnoiix
o
•o
■i h
CM
(oauj »% I 0 d*! *»^ n H tpuotnoMl
O -
(b
M
10
M
CSJ
t D • Ul
• ui 6 0 0 1
-B
<a
Pk
m
-p
o
rH
P.
I
•H
n M tpuotnoMi
Pm
tpuotno M I
fe
MBL WHOI Lihi.ity ^.tltIs
034