nee ey: el
Saiermannnnt
δὰ μὰ ὄν σαι ᾿
ταβ ισθντας
ΠΣ ΚΑ τὰ ὅν,
’ ees
eh te τὶ Py ah “πὶ
νὰ Toe ΨΥ ΕῊ
Σ ἣν ἐξ δε πὶ ἐν δὲ νὰ νὰν ALIFE HN σὴ ἂν λα δὲ Αναν PN BO νυ ΨΨΨΝ
δὲ δι ἐπὶ δ μεν ΝᾺ παγιδιν πὸ δὴν nada SAU σὰ δὲ δια ον ΑΝ σι αν, ote δι κρνδὴ αὶ σὰ σὺ δὲ Δ κυ ee.
rateely nee ratnanm με νον αν δ ρα nme ance aiiran hake een TT acm ocr
" ᾿ τ " ree :
nina pein Ἧς chat aan ἀν νον ον τ tam MSR EA Toe rth eh τ ν Ser penny pire τυ δεῖν iy τε een wreny ἴα τ ΔΑ
Pry Parity a —" BI ALS VRS Ot le SRA TaC AS DANS TON ROS a aa IAN “Ἐν
νων υψφυυ“φὐννν ον νον
rate get onescokan eure Δ τ ΡΣ ΤΥ ΣΙ
SCANT PC Ἀν Τ᾿ me MINN
=F Sy ΤΡ ῸΝ Tae as deen ΕΥ̓́Α Fm,
NI INN MAM Tee Aah aR Mee Ba By ALE tes 4
ων Sie mek metas etna a een
8PM Myth 2 ANA Src δ ἡ eo ae LAR
renee iea Rnenc ate alta ence het niRhr et ee oS ΤΣ
᾿ aN ves fy ae? Ἂν ΝΙΝ. πον, 5 De
Breas STL στα δ atte se totter tes oh : See Aa nn RN ονοκτττς
μὲ a y PRL A RAS RAE AO NA A RNS
he eet Patina σ' ᾿ “
mae na sete ene etc ἐν τ Atacama ; ΡΥ Ρ ΡΟΝ : |
im ety ὸ Cpe i
ΡΣ ΠΑ ρα, τες ἈΛΟΝ αν νυν ΦΈΡΟΙ 7 Ae tect UR FRR ὦ δι νος
AS Pe oh at ie Soe PAO OPO ee in sey
epbeinamanare mn ary Mann oboe tite Piri γον ον ee ewer z ¥ ν
er oe em ty OLS UPR Pe Pana Penge ees ν r piney » Seat αν ΟΣ besnan arene eet.
awe
RAE A
ere tra)
Ce tee ee nee
ΟὟ OF PRINCETG>
\
EOL OGICN. >
Spe 5199. Θ᾽ Θὰ
Hammond, Henry, 1605-1660.
Thirty-one sermons preached
on several occasions
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2015
https://archive.org/details/thirtyonesermonsO2hamm
᾿ ἌΝ A
i ἊΝ ἣν" pe ἢ
$i 4 ᾿ 1 ἡ Υ " ri
- | τ ᾿ ᾿ at = ὍΝ
a ny i,t My Nr i hig μ Ἄν.
ἼΥ p “8 ree ἥρω ee) Ϊ
᾿ It
eae δ νον,
THE
MISCELLANEOUS THEOLOGICAL WORKS
OF
HENRY HAMMOND, D.D.,
ARCHDEACON OF CHICHESTER, AND CANON OF CHRIST CHURCH.
ape . Νὰ » ᾿
ae " μεν δ
40 ΒΝ
ΠΝ
SI le! dled
ivy τω 4 ὃ Say:
>
41 ane Wen
WAT ΙΓ Pie
a Vale ἣ» 7 δ
τ’ ἀφο, ὍΝ
"ΚΑ OE
αν ΤΥ tee
THE
MISCELLANEOUS
ERE OLOGICAL WORKS
OF
HENRY HAMMOND, D.D.,
ARCHDEACON OF CHICHESTER AND CANON OF CHRIST CHURCH.
TO WHICH IS PREFIXED,
THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR,
BY JOHN FELL, D.D.,
_DEAN OF CH. CH., AND LORD BISHOP OF OXFORD.
THIRD EDITION.
VOLUME III.
CONTAINING SERMONS.
OXFORD:
JOHN HENRY PARKER.
MDCCCL,
Ss ehibh "PS iY
THIRTY-ONE SERMONS
PREACHED
ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS.
BY
ΠΝ Y HAMMOND, -D.D.,
ARCHDEACON OF CHICHESTER AND CANON OF CHRIST CHURCH.
“ον shall they hear, without a preacher? And how shall they
preach, except they be sent?” Rom. x. 14, 15.
“Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every crea-
ture.” St. Mark xvi. 15.
A NEW EDITION.
OXFORD :
JOHN HENRY PARKER,
MDCCCL.
ΠΤ"...
7
ne yi \ γι
γι
Γ ’
, ᾿
>
᾿Ξ “2 Δ.
fot
oe
.
J ei ΓΥΣ ἢ
᾿ ᾿ “"Ψ
} aa Ge
at. CATE i a
7 =<
4
; ᾿ ὃ ἐς
5. 7 ‘
᾿ Ἢ
, y “P “᾿ F
“tele ys Aa
τ ᾿ Ἢ , » Ps
‘6 i, ᾿ 4 vy 4 ὦ
ADVERTISEMENT.
THe arrangement of the Sermons in the present volume
follows the order observed in the folio edition of the author’s
works, and is entirely independent of the time of their de-
livery or publication. They belong to three different classes.
The first ten, as the reader will perceive by the Dedication,
were published towards the close of the year 1648. They
came out in a small 4to. volume, under circumstances which
are explained in the note at page 3, and a second edition
was published in 1652, but they were never again reprinted
apart from the other Sermons. With regard to the time at
which they were written or preached, the present editor can
give no further information than what the attentive reader
will gather for himself. It may be sufficient to notice that
the first and last were prepared for delivery in Advent, 1648,
and that the author has himself specified the time at which
the seventh, eighth, and ninth were preached, and from the
latter being called an Haster Sermon, at St. Mary’s in Oxford,
A.D. 1644, we may perhaps infer that the other two preached
in Lent, 1643, and 1645 respectively, were preached at some
other church in that city. But the style of the sermon and
the frequent quotations of Greek and Latin phrases suffi-
ciently indicate, that at whatever church they may have
vill ADVERTISEMENT.
been preached, the audience must have been members of the
University. It will be observed that the first and the tenth
sermons intended for the King, are more sparing in these
quotations from ancient authors in the original languages.
With regard to the remaining five, it can only be inferred
from their learned character, that they were intended for a
University audience, or at least for an educated congregation.
It must not be forgotten that the court was held at Oxford
during the year 1644. The royal proclamation convoking
the parliament to meet at Oxford on the following 22nd of
January, bears date, Dec. 22nd, 1643, and there were there
assembled eighty-three members of the upper, and a hundred
and sixty-five of the lower house, and they continued to sit
till April 16th, when the King adjourned the parliament.
A troop of horse had previously been sent under Sir John
Byron to Oxford, for its defence.
The next two Sermons are amongst the earliest, if they
are not quite the earliest production of Hammond’s pen,
but they did not appear in print till 1657, and then only as
an after-thought, as it appears, and with the view of giving
an interest to a volume of additional notes to his Para-
phrase and Annotations.
These two sermons are spoken of by his biographer? as a
specimen of a corisiderable number which he was from time
to time called upon to preach at the visitations of the clergy,
and at St. Paul’s cross. The latter forms the subject of an
interesting anecdote, in which Dr. Potter, the Dean of Wor-
cester, is spoken of as ascribing his worldly prosperity to his
having followed the advice there given. The story must
be in some respects inaccurately told, as Dr. Potter died at
the commencement of 1646, and it is not likely that the last
five or six years of his life having been spent however well,
* Life, p. xxvi.
ADVERTISEMENT. ΙΧ
would have entitled him to be spoken of as one ‘ whose
memory, for his remarkable charity and all other excellencies
befitting his profession and dignity in the Church, is precious.’
Besides, his preferments, such as they were, were all con-
ferred upon him some years previously. Of this sermon it
only remains to notice, that it was preached at St. Paul’s
cross, and not as is stated in the title, which is reprinted
exactly from the folio, in St. Paul’s church.
The remaining nineteen Sermons were not published till
after the author’s death, 1664, and as they appeared without
any advertisement, it is not known who was the editor, or
from what materials they were selected. The title-page in-
dicates that they were preached on several occasions, but
there is none but internal evidence to shew the period at
which, or the audience before whom they were preached.
They have all, with the exception of the fourth and the
last five, the character of University sermons, and it will be
observed that once in the fifth sermon (p. 363) his audience
are addressed as ‘right honourable.’ The reader will find in
many of them, expressions which lead to the supposition
that they were preached at Oxford, whilst the King’s troops
were there. With regard to the six which seem exceptions
to this, there appears no sufficient ground on which to
hazard a conjecture, as to whether they were preached in
his parish of Penshurst, before the civil war broke out, or
in Worcestershire after he had taken up his residence at
Westwood Park.
They were published in a small folio, which is divided into
two parts; the first, which contains the twelve Sermons, was
printed for Royston, the well-known publisher of the royalist
and episcopalian divines. The other nineteen, which now
came out for the first time, were printed for Garthwaite,
whose publications were also for the most part of the same
class. His name appearing in the title-page leads to the sup-
x ADVERTISEMENT.
position that Sheldon was the editor, for Garthwaite was
Sheldon’s publisher. This part also bears the Jmprimatur
of Geo. Stradling, domestic chaplain to Sheldon, then Bishop
of London. They were reprinted in 1675, and also in the
complete collection of the author’s works in 1684.
Nov. 8, 1850. Ne
>
\ THEOLORLAX Tie k
ἴω 5}»γ--
Ῥν...-: 3 ἡ. =
Ve νυγυυς =
CONTENTS.
SERMON I.
(Page 5.)
THE CHRISTIAN’S OBLIGATIONS TO PEACE AND CHARITY.
Isaiah ii. 4.
They shall beat their swords into plough shares, and their
spears into pruning hooks.
SERMON II.
(Page 28.)
CHRIST’S EASY YOKE.
Matthew xi. 30.
My yoke is easy, and My burden is light.
SERMON III.
(Page 48.)
EPHRAIM’S COMPLAINT.
Jeremiah xxxi. 18.
1 have surely heard Ephraim bemoaning himself thus; Thou
hast chastised me, and I was chastised, as a bullock unaccus-
tomed to the yoke : turn Thou me, and I shall be turned.
xu CONTENTS.
SERMON IV.
(Page 69.)
JOHN BAPTIST’S WARNING.
Matthew iii. 2.
Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
SERMON V.
(Page 85.)
GOD IS THE GOD OF BETHEL.
Genesis xxx. 18.
1 am the God of Bethel.
SERMON VI.
(Page 107.)
THE NECESSITY OF THE CHRISTIAN’S CLEANSING.
2 Corinthians vi. 1.
Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse
ourselves.
SERMON VII.
BEING A LENT SERMON AT OXFORD, A.D. 1643,
(Page 128.)
CHRIST AND BARABBAS.
John xviii. 40.
Not this Man, but Barabbas.
SERMON VIII.
BEING A LENT SERMON AT OXFORD, A.D. 1645.
(Page 151.)
ST. PAUL’S SERMON TO FELIX.
Acts xxiv. 25.
And as he reasoned of righteousness, and temperance, and
judgment to come, Felix trembled.
CONTENTS. xiii
SERMON IX.
BEING AN EASTER SERMON AT ST. MARY’S IN OXFORD, A.D. 1644.
(Page 173.)
THE BLESSING INFLUENCE OF CHRIST’S RESURRECTION.
Acts iil. 26.
God having raised up His Son Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in
turning away every one of you from his iniquities.
SERMON X.
PREPARED AT CARISBROOK CASTLE, BUT NOT PREACHED,
(Page 196.)
GOD’S COMPLAINT AGAINST REVOLTERS.
Isaiah 1. 5.
Why should you be stricken any more? you will revolt more
and more.
SERMON XI.
A SERMON PREACHED TO THE CLERGY OF THE DEANERY OF SHORHAM IN KENT,
AT THE VISITATION BETWEEN EASTER AND WHITSUNTIDE, A.D. 1639, HELD
AT ST. MARY-CRAY.
(Page 217.)
THE PASTOR’S MOTTO.
2 Corinthians xii. 14.
For I seek not yours, but you.
SERMON XII.
PREACHED IN ST. PAUL’S CHURCH BEFORE THE LORD MAYOR AND ALDERMEN
OF THE CITY OF LONDON, ON APRIL 12, A.p. 1640,
(Page 239.)
THE POOR MAN’S TITHING.
Deuteronomy xxvi. 12, 13.
When thou hast made an end of tithing all the tithes of thine
increase the third year. .. Then thou shalt say before the Lord
thy God...
XIV CONTENTS.
SERMON XIII.
(Page 273.)
Ezekiel xvi. 30.
The work of an imperious whorish woman.
SERMON XIV.
(Page 297.)
Philippians iv. 13.
1 can do all things through Christ that strengtheneth me.
SERMON XV.
(Page 316.)
Proverbs 1. 21.
How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity ?
SERMON XVI.
(Page 336,)
Matthew i. 238.
Emmanuel, which is by interpretation, God with us.
SERMON XVII.
(Page 353.)
Luke ix. 55.
Vou know not what spirit you are of.
SERMON XVIII.
(Page 374.)
Ezekiel xviii. 31.
For why will ye die?
SERMON XIX.
(Page 393.)
Jeremiah ν. 2.
Though they say, The Lord liveth; surely they swear falsely.
CONTENTS. XV
SERMON XxX.
(Page 411.)
Luke xviii. 11.
God, I thank Thee, that I am not as other men, extortioners, &c.,
or even as this publican.
SERMON XXI.
(Page 444.)
Matthew iii. 3.
Prepare ye the way of the Lord.
SERMON XXII.
(Page 466.)
John vii. 48.
Have any of the Pharisees believed on Him ?
SERMON XXIII.
(Page 489.)
Matthew x. 15.
It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah
in the day of judgment, than for that city.
SERMON XXIV.
(Page 507.)
Acts xvii. 30.
And the times of this ignorance God winked at, but now
commandeth all men every where to repent.
SERMON XXV.
(Page 528.)
Acts xvii. 30.
And the times of this ignorance God winked at, but now
commandeth all men every where to repent.
XV1 CONTENTS.
SERMON XXVI.
(Page 550.)
Romans 1. 26.
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections.
SERMON XXVIII.
(Page 580.)
Galatians vi. 15.
But a new creature.
SERMON XXVIII.
(Page 598.)
2 Peter ui. 3.
Scoffers walking after their own lusts.
SERMON XXIX.
(Page 616.)
2 Peter 111. ὃ,
Scoffers walking after their own lusts.
SERMON XXX.
(Page 632.)
1 Timothy i. 15.
Of whom I am the chief.
PARS SECUNDA.
SERMON XXXI.
(Page 648.)
1 Timothy i. 15.
Of whom I am the chief:
peeee
PR a ON on Ny
ἀν ἀν ee
uur EMIN KBE:
Verve vuwvwe
SERMON XVII.
Luke ix. 55.
You know not what spirit you are of.
Or all errors or ignorances there are none so worthy our
pains to cure, or caution to prevent, as those that have influ-
ence on practice. The prime ingredient in the making up a
wise man, saith Aristotle in his Metaphysics, is to be well-
advised περὶ ὧν ἀπορῆσαι δεῖ πρῶτον, what doubts must
first be made, what ignorances earliest provided for: and
there is not a more remarkable spring and principle of all
the Scripture folly (that is wickedness) among men, than the
beginning our Christian course unluckily, with some one or
more false infusions, which not only are very hardly ever cor-
rected afterward—like the errors of the first concoction, that
are never rectified in the second—but moreover have an in-
auspicious poisonous propriety in them, turn all into nourish-
ment of the prevailing humour: and then, as the injury of
filching some of that corn that was delivered out for seed,
hath a peculiar mark of aggravation upon it; is not to be
measured in the garner but in the field; not by the quan-
tity of what was stolen, but of what it would probably have
proved in the harvest; so the damage that is consequent to
this infelicity is never fully aggravated but by putting into
the bill against it all the sins of the whole life; yea, and all
the damnation that attends it.
Of this kind I must profess to believe the ignorance of the
gospel-spirit to be chief, an ignorance that cannot choose
but have an influence on every public action of the life. So
that as Padre Paolo was designed a handsome office in the
5. [Aristot. Metaph. B. c. 1.]
HAMMOND. Aa
854 SERMON XVII.
senate of Venice, to sit by and observe, and take care nequid
contra pietatem ; so it were to be wished that every man on
whom the name of Christ is called had some assistant angel,
some ἐπίτροπος δαίμων, be it conscience, be it the remem-
brance of what I now say unto him, to interpose in all, espe-
cially the visible undertakings of the life, nequid contra spiri-
tum Evangelii, that nothing be ventured on but what is agree-
able to the spirit of the gospel. Even disciples themselves
may, it seems, run into great inconveniences for want of it;
James and John did so in the text ; ignem de celo, “ fire from
heaven” on all that did not treat them so well as they ex-
pected; but Christ turned and reproved them, saying, “ You
know not what spirit,” οἵου πνεύματος, ‘ what kind of spirit
you are οἵ; and that with an ἔμφασις on ὑμεῖς, not ὑμεῖς
ἐστὲ, but ἔστε ὑμεῖς, you “disciples,” you “Christians,” “ You
know not what spirit you are of.”
In the words it will be very natural to observe these three
particulars; 1. That there is a peculiar spirit that Christians
are of, οἵου πνεύματος ὑμεῖς: 2. That some prime Christians
do not know the kind of spirit, οὐκ οἴδατε: even so James
and John, “ You know not,” &c.: 3. That this ignorance is
apt to betray Christians to unsafe, unjustifiable designs and
actions. You that would have fire from heaven, do it upon
this one ignorance, “ You know not,” &e.
I begin first with the first of these, that there is a peculiar
spirit that Christians are of; a spirit of the gospel; and that
must be considered here, not in an unlimited latitude, but
only as it is opposite to the spirit of Elias, θέλεις ὡς καὶ
Ἠλίας; wilt thou do as he did? It will then be necessary to
shew you the peculiarity of the gospel spirit by its oppo-
sition to that of Elias, which is manifold; for instance, first,
Elias was the great assertor of law; upon which ground
Moses and he appear with our Saviour at His transfigura-
tion; so that two things will be observable which make a
difference betwixt the legal and the gospel spirit: 1. That
some precepts of Christ now clearly (and with weight
upon them) delivered by Christ, were, if in substance de-
livered at all, yet sure not so clearly, and at length, and
intelligibly proposed under the law. You have examples in
SERMON XVII. 855
the fifth of Matthew, in the opposition betwixt the ἐρρήθη Matt. v.
ἀρχαίοις, what was said by Moses to the ancients, and the
ἐγὼ δὲ ὑμῖν, Christ’s sayings to His disciples; which if they
be interpreted of Moses’ law,—as many of the particulars are
evidently taken out of the decalogue, “Thou shalt not kill,
commit adultery, perjury,”—Christ’s are then clearly super-
additions unto Moses’; or if they refer to the Pharisees’ glosses,
—as some others of them possibly may do,—then do those
glosses of those Pharisees—who were none of the loosest nor
ignorantest persons among them; but, ἀκριβεστάτη αἵρεσις, [ Acts xxvi.
for their lives the strictest ; and, “ they sit in Moses’ chair, and a ἡ
whateverthey teach, that do,” for their learning most consider- eae 2.]
able—argue the Mosaic precepts not to be so clear and in-
capable of being misinterpreted; and so still Christ’s were
additions, if not of the substance, yet of light and lustre, and
consequently improvements of the obligation to obedience in
us Christians, who enjoy that light, and are precluded those
excuses of ignorance that a Jew might be capable of. From
whence I may sure conclude, that the ego autem, of not re-
taliating, or revenging of injuries,—for that is sure the mean-
ing of the μὴ ἀντιστῆναι, which we render “ resist not evil,” [ Matt. v.
—the strict precept of loving, and blessing, and praying for 52]
enemies, and the like, is more clearly preceptive, and so more
indispensably obligatory to us Christians, than ever it was to
the Jews before. And there you have one part of the spirit
of the gospel, in opposition to a first notion of the legal spirit.
And by it you may conclude, that what Christian soever can
indulge himself the enjoyment of that hellish sensuality, that
of revenge, or retributing of injuries; nay, that doth not prac-
tise that high piece of (but necessary, be it never so rare) per-
fection of “overcoming evil with good ;” and so heap those [Rom. xii.
precious melting coals of love, of blessings, of prayers, those a
three species of sacred vestal fire upon all enemies’ heads;
nescit qualis spiritus, ‘‘he knows not what kind of spirit he
is of.”
But there is another thing observable of the law, and so of
the Judaical legal spirit; to wit, as it concerned the planting
the Israelites in Canaan, and that is the command of rooting
out the nations; which was a particular case, upon God’s
sight of the filling up of the measure of the Amorites’ sins, [πὰ XVe
Aad
{ Mark iii.
17.]
[2 Pet. i.
20. ]
[ Amos iii.
8.]
356 SERMON XVII.
and a judicial sentence of His proceeding upon them; not
only revealed to those Israelites, but that with a peremptory
command annexed to it, to hate, and kill, and eradicate some
of those nations. Which case, because it seldom or never
falls out to agree in all circumstances with the case of any
other sinful people, cannot lawfully prescribe to the eradi-
cating of any other—though in our opinion never so great
—enemies of God, until it appear as demonstrably to us, as
it did to those Israelites, that it was the will of God they
should be so dealt with; and he that thinks it necessary to
shed the blood of every enemy of God, whom his censorious
faculty hath found guilty of that charge, that is all for the
fire from heaven, though it be upon the Samaritans, the not
receivers of Christ, is but as the Rabbis call him sometimes
one of the o97 93 and wx )5, “ sons of bloods,” in the plural
number, and “sons of fire ;” yea, and like the disciples in my
text, Boanerges, “sons of thunder,” far enough from the soft
temper that Christ left them; “ Ye know not what kind of
spirit ye are of.”
In the next place, Elias’ spirit was a prophetic spirit, whose
dictates were not the issue of discourse and reason, but im-
pulsions from heaven. The prophetic writings were not, saith
St. Peter, ἰδίας ἐπιλύσεως, (I conceive in an agonistic sense,)
of “their own starting,” or incitation, as they were moved or
prompted by themselves, but, as it follows, ὑπὸ πνεύματος
ἁγίου φερόμενοι, “as they were carried by the Holy Ghost ;”
not as they were led, but carried ;—“ when the Lord speaks,
who can but prophesy?” And so likewise are the actions pro-
phetic ; many things that are recorded to be done by prophets
in Scripture, they proceed from some peculiar incitations of
God; I mean not from the ordinary, or extraordinary, gene-
ral, or special direction or influence of His grace, co-operat-
ing with the Word, as in the breast of every regenerate man,
—for the spirit of sanctification, and the spirit of prophecy,
are very distant things,—but from the extraordinary revela-
tion of God’s will, many times against the settled rule of
duty—acted and animated not as a living creature, by a soul,
but moved as an outward impellent, a sphere by an intelli-
gence, and that frequently into eccentrical and planetary
motions; so that they were no further justifiable than that
SERMON XVII. 357
prophetic calling to that particular enterprise will avow.
Consequent to which is, that because the prophetic office
was not beyond the Apostles’ time to continue constantly
in the Church, any further than to interpret, and super-
struct upon what the canon of the Scripture hath settled
among Christians,—Christ and His word in the New Testa-
ment being bath-col, which the Jews tell us was alone to
survive all the other ways of prophecy,—he that shall now
pretend to that prophetic spirit, to some vision, to teach what
the word of God will not own; to some incitation to do what
the New Testament law will not allow of; he that with the
late friar in France”, pretends to ecstatical revelations, with
the enthusiasts of the last age°, and fanatics now with us, to
ecstatical motions; that with Mahomet pretends a dialogue
with God, when he is in an epileptic fit, sets off the most
ghastly diseases, I shall add, most horrid sins, by undertak-
ing more particular acquaintance and commerce with the
Spirit of God, a call from God’s providence and extraordi-
nary commission from heaven, for those things, which if the
New Testament be canonical, are evaporate from hell; and so
first “leads captive silly women,’—as Mahomet did his wife,
—and then a whole army of Janizaries into a war, to justify
and propagate such delusions, and put all to death that will
not be their proselytes, is far enough from the gospel spirit
that lies visible in the New Testament (verbum vehiculum
spiritus), and the preaching of the word (διακονία πνεύμα-
tos), and is not infused by dream or whisper, nor autho-
rized by a melancholy or fanatic fancy ; and so οὐκ οἶδεν οἵου,
“knows not what kind,” &e.
In the third place, Elias was the great precedent and ex-
ample of sharp unjudiciary procedure with malefactors, which
[differed] from the common ordinary awards on criminals, in
that execution preceded trial, and the malefactor suflered ἐπ᾽
αὐτοφώρῳ, without attending the formalities of law.
[2 Tim. iii.
6.]
[2 Cor. iii.
8.]
Of this kind two examples are by Mattathias cited, one of 1 Maccab.
> Pere Barnard,
¢ Copinger or Arthington. [ Fana-
ties in the reign of Q. Elizabeth, the
pretended prophets of Hacket who pre-
tended to be our Saviour; see the book
entitled ‘‘ Conspiracie for intended Re-
formation, a treatise discovering the late
designments and courses held for ad-
vancement thereof by Edmund Cop-
pinger, William Hacket, and Henry
Arthington (out of others’ depositions,
and th_ir own letters, writings and con-
fessions.) 4to. Lond, 1592. (by Rich,
Cosin, LL.D.)’’]
ii, (54. ]
[1 Mace.
ii. 58.]
[2 Kings
i. 10 ]
[ Acts vii.
59; xiv. 5,
19. |
[John ii.
15.]
[ Ps. lxix.
95]
358 SERMON XVII.
cv. Phinehas, ἐν τῷ ζηλῶσαι ζῆλον, that “ zealed a zeal,” and, in
that, run through Zimri and Cozbi, and so—as the captain
once answered for the killing the drowsy sentinel—reliquit
quos invenit, found them in unclean embraces, and so left
them. And the variety of our interpretations in rendering
of that passage in the Psalm, “Then stood up Phinehas and
prayed,” in the old, and “then stood up Phinehas and ex-
ecuted judgment,” in the new translations, may perhaps give
some account of that action of his, that upon Phinehas’ prayer
for God’s direction what should be done in that matter, God
raised up him in an extraordinary manner to execute judg-
ment on those offenders. And the other of Elias in the text,
and he with some addition, ἐν τῷ ζηλῶσαι ζῆλον νόμου, “ In
zealing the zeal of the law, called fire from heaven upon those
that were sent out from Ahaziah, to bring him to him.” And
this fact of his, by God’s answering his call, and the coming
down of the fire upon them, was demonstrated to come from
God also, as much as the prediction of the king’s death, which
was confirmed by this means.
It may very probably be guessed by Mattathias’ words in
that place, that there were no precedents of the zelotic spirit
in the Old Testament but those two; for among all the cata-
logue of examples mentioned to his sons to inflame their zeal
to the law, he produceth no other; and it is observable, that
though there be practices of this nature mentioned in the
story of the New Testament, the stoning of St. Stephen, of St.
Paul at Iconium, &c., yet all of them practised by the Jews,
and not one that can seem to be blameless, but that of Christ
(who sure had extraordinary power) upon the buyers and
sellers in the temple; upon which the Apostles remembered
the Psalmist’s prophecy, ζῆλος κατέφαγε, the “zeal of God’s
house” carried him to that act of νέμεσις, of indignation and
punishment upon the transgressors. And what mischief was
done among the Jews by those of that sect in Josephus 4, that
called themselves by the name of zealots, and withal took
upon them to be the saviours and preservers of the city, but
as it proved, the hasteners and precipitators of the destruc-
tion of that kingdom, by casting out and killing the high-
priests first, and then the nobles and chief men of the nation,
4 [Josephus de Bell. Jud., lib, iv. 3. et passim. ]
SERMON XVII. 359
and so embasing and intimidating, and dejecting the hearts of
all the people, that all was at length given up to their fury—
Josephus, and any of the learned that have conversed with the
Jewish writers, will instruct the enquirer. And ever since, no
very honourable notion had of es in the New Testament ;
one of the “ fruits of the flesh,” Gal. v., of the “ wisdom that Gal. v.
comes not from heaven,” Jam. 11]., ‘aid in the same, πικρὸς ἐπ “ee
ζῆλος, a “ bitter zeal,” a gall that will embitter all that come £14, 15.]
near it. The short of it is, the putting any man to death, or
inflicting other punishment upon any terms but that of legal,
perfectly legal process, is the importance of a zelotic spirit,
as 1 remember in Maimonides “, “ him that curses God in the
name of an idol, the p'x3p that meet him, kill him,” 1.6. the zea-
lots—permitted, it seems, if not authorized to doso. And this
is the spirit of Elias, that is of all others most evidently repre-
hended and renounced by Christ. The Samaritans, no very
sacred persons, added to their habitual constant guilts at
that time to deny common civility of entertainment to Christ
Himself; and the disciples asked whether they might not do
what Elias had done, “call for fire from heaven” upon them [Luke ix.
in that case; and Christ tells them that the gospel spirit was ἢ
of another complexion from that of Elias, καὶ στραφεὶς ἐπε-
τίμησε, turned to them as He did to Peter, when He said, Piste XVi.
“Get thee behind Me, Satan ;” as to so many fiery satanical- ~ ‘J
spirited men, and checked them for that their furious zeal,
with an οὐκ οἴδατε οἵου, x.T.r. The least I can conclude from
hence is this, that they that put any to death by any but
perfectly legal process, that draw the sword upon any but
by the supreme magistrate’s command, are far enough from
the gospel spirit, whatever precedent they can produce to
countenance them. And so if they be really what they pre-
tend, Christians, οὐκ οἴδασι, they are in a prodigious mistake
or ignorance; “they know not what spirit they are of.”
Yet further it is observable of Elias, that he did execrate
and curse, call for judgments from heaven upon men’s per-
sons ; and that temper of mind in the parallel, you may dis-
tribute into two sorts: first,im passing judgments upon men’s
future estates, the censorious reprobating spirit, which though
we find it not in Elias at this time, yet is a consequent of
© De Idol., ο. 2. [sect. xiii. p. 34. ed. Voss. 1641.]
[Luke
xviii. 11.]
{John vii.
49.
[e. g. Ps.
cix. |
{ Rom. xii.
20.]
3860 SERMON XVII.
the prophetic office, and part of the burden received from
the Lord, and laid upon those guilty persons concerning
whom it hath pleased Almighty God to reveal that secret of
Tlis cabinet; but then this rigour cannot, without sin, be
pretended to by any else; for im the blackest instances,
“charity believes all things,’ and “hopes all things,’ and
even in this sense, “‘covers the multitudes of sins.” Now
this so culpable an insolent humour, rashly to pass a con-
demning sentence, was discernible in the Pharisees,—“ this
publican,” whose profession and trade is forbidden by that
law, and this “ people that know not that law, is accursed,”
—so likewise in the Montanists,—mnos spirituales, and all
others animales and psychici —so in the Romanists (who
condemn all but themselves) and in all those generally
whose pride and malice conjoined—most directly contrary
to the gospel spirit of humility and charity—doth prepare
them one, and the other inflame them, to triumph and glut
themselves in this spiritual assassinacy, this deepest dye of
blood, the murdering of souls; which because they cannot
do it really, they endeavour in effigy, anathematize and
slaughter them here in this other Calvary, the place for
the crucifying of reputations, turning them out of the com-
munion of their charity, though not of bliss; and I am confi-
dent reject many whom the angels entertain more hospitably.
Another part of this cursing spirit there is, more peculiarly
Elias’s, that of praying (and so calling) for curses on men’s
persons; and that being upon the enemies of God, and those
appearing to Elias a prophet to be such, might be then law-
ful to him and others like him—David perhaps, &c., in the
Old Testament—but is wholly disliked and renounced by
Christ under this state of higher discipline to which Chris-
tians are designed by Him in the New. I say, not only for
that which concerns our own enemies, for that is clear,
“When thine enemy hungereth, feed him ;” and somewhat
like that in the Old Testament, “ When thine enemy’s‘ox,”
&e.&: but I extend it even to the enemies of God Himself,
and that I need not do upon other evidence than is afforded
1 (Cf. Tertullian. de jejun. ad init.] 485 of him that hateth thee lying under
® (‘‘Ifthou meet thine enemy’s ox his burden, and wouldest forbear to
or his ass going astray, thou shalt surely help him, thou shalt surely help witi
bring itto him again. If thou seethe him.” Exod. xxiii. 4, 5.]
SERMON XVII. 361
from the text; the Samaritans were enemies of Christ Him-
self and were barbarous and inhuman to His person, and
they must not be cursed by disciples. And he that can now
curse even wicked men, who are more distantly the enemies
of God, can call for—I say not discomfiture upon their de-
vices, for that is charity to them, to keep them from being
such unhappy creatures as they would be, contrivers of so
much mischief to the world; but—plagues and ruin upon
their persons,—which is absolutely the voice of revenge, that
sulphur-vapour of hell ;—he that delighteth in the misery of
any part of God’s image,—and so usurps upon that wretched
quality of which we had thought the devil had gotten the
monopoly—that of éxvyarpexaxia, joying in the brother’s
misery,—but now see with horror is got loose out of that pit
to rave among us ;—he that would mischief, if it were in his
power, and, now it is not, by unprofitable wishes of execra-
tion shews his good-will toward it, is quite contrary to the
gospel spirit, and so οὐκ οἶδε οἵου, “he knows not,” ἕο.
Lastly, Elias was not only rapt to heaven, but moved on
earth in a fiery chariot, ζηλώσας ζῆλον, saith the author of [1 bree
the book of Maccabees; his zeal had fire and fire again, =
ζηλόω comes from ζέω, an excessive fervency,—and agreeable
to his temper is his appetite ; he desires nothing but fire upon
his adversaries, calls for fire, and fire, and fire, as you may see
it in the story. And the gospel spirit is directly contrary to
this, an allaying, quenching spirit, a gentle lambent flame,
that sits on the Apostles’ heads to enlighten and adorn; by
its vital warmth expelling partial hectic heats, and burning
feverish distempers, that spiritual πύρωσις mentioned in the
gospel; and putting in the place, a cool, sedate, and equable
temper, “to have peace with all men,” and chiefly with our-
selves, φιλοτιμεῖσθαι ἡσυχάζειν,---ὰ admirable phrase in [1 Thess.
St. Paul,—to use as much diligence to restore the earth to '™ 1 }
peace again as all the wind, or air, or perhaps fire in its
bowels (I mean, ambitious, contentious men) do to set it
a shaking; and he that will not contribute his utmost to
quench those flames, that will not joyfully do any thing
that may not directly or by consequence include sin, to-
ward the extinguishing a fire thus miserably gotten into the
veins and bowels of a calamitous kingdom, is far enough
[2 Kings
xviii. 33.]
362 SERMON XVII.
from the gospel spirit, and so οὐκ οἷδε οἵου, “he knows
not,” &c.
I shall not clearly give you the gospel spirit unless I
proceed from its opposition to Elias’ act, to that other, the
opposition to the motion of those disciples, considered in the
particular circumstances. The case stood thus; Christ was
going up to Jerusalem, thereupon the Samaritans receive
Him not; the disciples will have fire from heaven upon those
Samaritans. Jerusalem was at that time the only proper
place of God’s worship, and may note to us as an emblem,
the true established Protestant religion of this kingdom.
The Samaritans were great enemies to this, enemies to
Jerusalem ; being, first, heretics in religion, took in the
Assyrian idols into the worship of the true God; ‘they
feared the Lord, and served their own gods,” as it is in the
story, and continued their wont when they turned Chris-
tians, make up the first sort of heretics in Epiphanius’
catalogue". Secondly, they were schismatics in an eminent
manner, set up a new separation by themselves on mount
Gerizim. And further yet, in the third place, pretended to
the only purity and antiquity; they lived where Jacob once
lived; and therefore, though Assyrians by extraction, they
boast they are Jacob’s seed, and pretend more antiquity for
that schism of theirs, because Jacob once worshipped in that
mountain, than they think can be shewed for the temple at
Jerusalem, which was but in Solomon’s time of a later struc-
ture. Just as they which pretended, though never so falsely,
that they were of Christ, have still despised and separated
from all others as novelists, which walked im the Apostles’
steps and practices; and so Samaritans under guilts enough ;
first, haters of Jerusalem; secondly, heretics; thirdly, sepa-
ratists; fourthly, pretenders—though without all reason
—to the first antiquity, and so arrogant hypocrites too;
and fifthly, beyond all, prodigious, but still confident, dis-
puters; and yet, sixthly, one higher step than all these, con-
temners and haters of all, even of Christ Himself, on this
only quarrel, because He was a friend to Jerusalem, and
looked as if He were a going thither, as if He had some
favour to the established religion of the land. I wish this
ΝΒ. Epiphanius cont. Hereses, lib. i. p. 24.] |
= ee
a συν
SERMON XVII. 363
passage did not hitherto parallel itself; but seeing it doth
too illustriously to be denied or disguised, I shall imagine
that that which follows may do so too.
All this together was temptation to two honest disciples,
to think fire from heaven a but reasonable reward for such
Samaritans; and, having flesh and blood about them, com-
pounded with piety, you will not much wonder at them that
they were wrought on by the temptation; and yet this very
thought of theirs, the Κύριε θέλεις, is presently checked by
Christ, as being against the gospel spirit; ‘you know not
what spirit you are of.’ Haters of the Church, heretics,
schismatics, hypocrites, irrational pretenders, enemies, con-
tumelious even to Christ Himself, must not presently be
assigned the devil’s portion, the ἐσφράγισται ταμιεῖα, may
be yet capable of some mercy, some humanity, not instantly
devoted to be sacrifices to our fury. The gospel spirit will
have thoughts of peace, of reconcileableness toward them.
And let me beseech God first, and then you, right honour-
able: God, that He endue and inspire your hearts with this
piece of the gospel spirit, so seasonable to your present con-
sultations; and you, that you would not reject my prayers to
God, but open your hearts to receive the return of them, and
not imitate even the disciples of Christ, in that they are Boa-
nerges; but stay till the cool of the day, till you have them
in a calmer temper, when Christ’s word and doctrine hath
stilled those billows, as once He did the other tempestuous
element. It was Antoninus’! way to be revenged on his
enemies, μὴ ἐξομοιοῦσθαι, not to imitate them, whatever he
did. And this was but an essay or obscure shadow of the
Christian magnanimity, that goes for poverty of spirit in the
world, but proceeding from the right principle of unshaken
patience, of constant unmoveable meekness, of design to be
hike our royal Master-sufferer. ‘Father, forgive them” that [Luke
crucify Me; and “ Go and preach” the doctrine of the king- = 47)
dom to them, after they have crucified Me. And you know .
all we ministers ever since are but ambassadors of Christ,
to ingrate crucifying enemies, “ praying them in Christ’s [2 Cor. v.
name and stead that they would be reconciled,” that they 7%!
1 ["Apioros τρόπος τοῦ ἀμύνεσθαι, Td μὴ ἐξομοιοῦσθαι .--- Antoninus ad Seipsum,
lib. vi. § 6.]
{John xiii.
35.]
[ohn xiv.
Pf)
{ Matt. xi.
29. ]
James iii.
(17.]
[ Gal. v.
22.4
ΠΕΡ τι:
1.)
ΓΙ τι. 1.2:
9604. SERMON XVII.
that have done the wrong will vouchsafe to be friends.
What is it but that eminent piece of gospel spirit which they
that can be persuaded to part with, for all the sweetness that
thirst of revenge can promise or pretend to bring in unto
them, are unhappily ignorant of the richest jewel that ever
came within their reach. “They know not,” &c.
I have as yet given you the gospel spirit in one colour or
notion, that of its opposition to Elias first, and then to the
Boanerges. It will be necessary to add somewhat of the
positive consideration of it, though that must be fetched
from other Scriptures. And this will be but necessary to
this text, because that which is here mentioned is the πνεῦ-
μα, spirit in the extent, not only that one part of it that re-
spected the present action; where, though any one eminent
defect—that particularly wherein those disciples offended—
were destructive to the gospel spirit, malum ex quolibet defectu,
yet all the several branches of it are required to integrate or
make up the gospel spirit, bonwm ex essentia integra. And
what these branches are I cannot better direct you, than by
putting you in mind of these few severals. First, Christ’s badge
or cognizance—“ By this shall all men know that ye are My
disciples, if you love one another’’—not of one opinion, but
of love. Add nunquam leti sitis), &c., as Jews rend garments
at blasphemy, so we at uncharitableness. Secondly, Christ’s
legacy, “ Peace I leave with you, My peace I give unto you.”
Thirdly, Christ’s copy, “ Learn of Me;” what is beyond all
His other perfections, “I am meek.” Fourthly, the nature
of that ‘“ wisdom which cometh from above; first pure, then
peaceable.” Fifthly, the quality of the fruits of the spirit in
St. Paul; “ Love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, good-
ness, faith, meekness,” &c. Sixthly, the gallantry of meek-
ness in St. Peter, “Ornament of a meek and quiet spirit.”
Seventhly, Titus’ charge that all Christians are to be put in
mind of, “To be subject to principalities, to obey magistrates,
to be ready to every good work, to speak evil of no man, to be
no brawlers (ἄμαχοι, no fighters), but gentle, shewing all
meekness to all men”’—things that it seems nothing but
j Nazar. Sosp. [So in printed edi- pel by St. Jerome, Comment. in Ephes.
tions by mistake for Gosp. The pas- lib. iii. (in cap. v. 4.) Op., tom. vii. p.
sage is quoted from the Nazarene Gos- 641. Β, See above, Serm. ii. p. 37.]
SERMON XVII. 365
Christianity could infuse—“For we ourselves were some-
times fools, disobedient, &c. . . . but after the kindness
and love of God our Saviour appeared,” then room for this
spirit. :
I cannot give you ἃ readier landscape to present them all
to your view together than that excellent sermon of Christ
upon the mount, that ἄκρον καὶ κορυφὴ φιλοσοφίας, as Chry-
sostom calls it, ‘that top pitch of divine philosophy,” worthy
to be imprinted in every man’s heart; and of which he that
hath not been a pondering student, and resolved to regulate
his practice by it, as much as his faith by the Apostles’ creed ;
yea, and to lay down his life a martyr of that doctrine—though
he hath all faith, I cannot promise myself much of his Chris-
tianity. If you will have the brachygraphy of that, the ma-
nual picture that may be sure, either in words or sense, never
to depart from your bosom, but remain your constant phy-
lactery or preservative from the danger of all ungodly spirits,
then take the beatitudes in the front of it ; and among them—
that I may, if it be possible, bring the whole [liads into a nut-
shell—those that import immediately our duty towards men ;
for in that the gospel spirit especially consists, increasing our
love to brethren, whose flesh Christ now assumed, and in
whose interests He hath a most immediate concern. And if
you mark, in the chapter following, all the improvements
mentioned, except only that of swearing, belong to the com-
mands of the second table. And then the integral parts of
this gospel spirit will be these four constantly, humility,
meekness, mercifulness, peaceableness, and if need be, suffer-
ing too. Every of these four brought in to us with a checker
or lay of duty towards God, of mourning betwixt humility
and meekness; hungering and thirsting after righteous-
ness, betwixt meekness and mercifulness; purity of heart be-
twixt mercifulness and peaceableness; and persecution and
reproaches, and πᾶν πονηρὸν ῥῆμα, every Rabshakeh topic
of railing rhetoric vomited out upon us,—blessed persecu-
tion, blessed reproaches, when our holding to Christ is that
which brings them all upon us,—the consummation and
crown of all.
. Having but named you these severals, humility, meekness,
mercifulness, peaceableness, and, if need be, patience of all
[ Tit. 11}. 3.]
[See Matt.
νυν. 8—12.]
[John
xviii. 10.]
366 SERMON XVII.
stripes, both of hand and tongue; the sparkling gems in this
jewel, blessed ingredients in this gospel spirit, you will cer-
tainly resolve it full time for me to descend to my second
particular at first proposed, that some disciples there were,
some prime professors do not know the kind of that spirit,
οὐκ οἴδατε οἵου, “You know not what kind of spirit you
are of.”
James and John it appears were such disciples, and that
after they had been for some competent time followers and
auditors of His sermons; so far an ‘easier thing it is to leave
their worldly condition and follow Christ, than to leave their
carnal prejudices and ignorances and obey Him; especially
those that had such hold in their passions,—as revenge, they
say, 15 the pleasingest piece of carnality in the heap,—cheaper
to hear His gospel sermons than to practise them. And you
will less wonder at these two when you see that St. Peter him-
self, after a longer space of proficiency in that school, even at
the time of Christ’s attachment, had not yet put off that igno-
rance, ὁ θερμὸς Πέτρος, say the fathers *, Peter was of an hot
constitution, and Christ’s doctrine had not yet got down deep
enough into his heart to allay or cool him. Nondum con-
cipiens in se Evangelicam patientiam illam traditam sibi a
Christo, &c., saith Origen'; that gospel patience and peace-
ableness that Christ had commended to him, he had not, it
seems, yet received into an honest heart, and so he makes no
scruple to cut off Malchus’ ear when he was provoked to it.
I have heard of a friar that could confess that Malchus sig-
nified a king, and yet after made no scruple to acknowledge
him in that notion to be the high-priest’s servant; and
secondly, to justify St. Peter’s act and avoid Christ’s repre-
hension, by saying that he was chid, not for doing so much,
but for doing no more; not for cutting off his ear, but for
not directing the blow better to the cutting off his head.
And how far this friar’s barbarous divinity hath been justi-
fied of late by the writings of some—who will yet persuade us
that Christ did not reprehend St. Peter for that act—and by
k fe. g. St. Chrysostom; τὶ οὖν 6 ' (Origen. Tractat. xxxv. in S. Matth.
Πέτρος 6 πανταχοῦ θερμὸς καὶ ἀεὶ τῶν ὃ 101. Op., tom. iii. p. 907 E. Only
ἄλλων mporndav.—Op., tom. vii. p.5259. extant in the Latin.] *
D; cf. ibid., p. 524. D.]
SERMON XVII. 367
the actions of others, I have little joy to represent unto you;
God knows I love not to widen breaches; only Iam sure the
fathers are clear; that though formerly St. Peter were igno-
rant, and from that ignorance and zeal together, ran into
that fury, yet Christ μεταρρυθμίζων αὐτὸν εἰς εὐαγγελικὴν
πολιτείαν τὰ, desirous to tune him to that sweet harmonical
gospel temper, tells him he must not use the sword,—he
having no commission, especially against those that have it,
though they use it never so 1]],---κἂν τὸν θεὸν δοκεῖ τις ἐνδι-
xeiv, “though it were to avenge even God Himself.” And
having given you these proofs of this ignorance in three dis-
ciples, I think it is possible I might extend it to the rest of
them that they were in this particular ignorant too,—as it
seems they were in many other things,—till the Holy Ghost
came according to promise, “to teach them all things, and [John xiv.
to bring to their remembrance,”—to thaw their memories, 2
that the words of Christ, like the voice in Plutarch that
had been frozen, might at length become audible; or as
Plato’s precepts were learned by his scholars when they
were young, but never understood till they were men of
full age, and tamer passions",—I say, to bring to their re-
membrance whatsoever Christ had in person said unto them.
And 1 wish to God it were uncharitable to charge this igno-
rance still upon disciples, after so many solemn embassies of
the Holy Ghost unto us, to teach us and remember us of
this duty. Nay, I wish, that now after He hath varied the
way of appearing, after He hath sat upon us in somewhat a
more direful shape, not of a dove, but vulture,—tearing even
the flesh from us on purpose, that when we have less of that
carnal principle left, there might be some heed taken to this
gospel spirit,—there were yet some proficiency observable
among us, some heavings of the εὐαγγελικὴ πολιτεία, that
hath so long been a working in the world; I am confident
there were no such way of designing a prosperous, flourish-
ing, durable kingdom, as to found its policy upon gospel
principles, and maintain it by the gospel spirit. I have au-
thority to think that was the meaning of that prophecy of
™ Theophyl. Comm. in Matth. xxvi. suos in virtute sentiat profectus,” ὃ 7.
[Op., tom. i. p. 151. B.] Op., tom. i, P. i, p. 802, Wyttenb. ]
5 [See Plutarch; ‘“‘Quomodo quis
[Isa. iii.
4.)
[ Gen. viii.
[ Acts xxvi.
28. ]
Psalm cix.
368 SERMON XVII.
Christ’s “turning swords into plough-shares,” not that He
should actually bring peace, He tells you that it would prove
quite contrary, but because the fabric of the gospel is such
that would all men live by it, all wars and disquiets would be
banished out of the world. It was a madness in Machiavel
to think otherwise, and yet the unhappiness of the world
that Sir Thomas More’s book that designed it thus should
be then called Utopia, and that title to this hour remain
perfect prophecy, no place to be found where this dove may
rest her foot, where this gospel spirit can find reception.
No not among disciples themselves, those that profess to
adventure their lives to set up Christ’s kingdom in its purity ;
none so void of this knowledge as they. Whether we mean
a speculative or practical knowledge of it, few arrived to that
height or vacancy of considering whether there be such a
spirit or no. Some so in love with nature, that old Pelagian
idol, resolve that sufficient to bring them to heaven, if they
but allow their brethren what they can claim by that grand
character, love of friends, those of the same persuasion,
those that have obliged them; they have nature’s leave, and
so are resolved to have Christ’s, to hate, pursue to death
whom they can fancy their enemies. And I wish some
were but thus of Agrippa’s religion, ἐν ὀλίγῳ Χριστιανοὶ,
so near being Christians as nature itself would advance
them; that gratitude, honour to parents, natural affection,
were not become malignant qualities, disclaimed as consci-
entiously as obedience and justice, and honouring of bet-
ters. Others again so devoted to Moses’ law, the Old Tes-
tament spirit, that whatever they find practised there, they
have sufficient authority to transcribe. And it is observ-
able that they which think themselves little concerned in
the Old Testament duties,—which have a long time passed
for unregenerate morality, that faith hath perfectly out-
dated,—are yet zealous assertors of the Old Testament
spirit, all their pleas for the present resistance fetched
from them, yea, and confessed by some that this liberty
was hidden by God in the first ages of the Christian Church,
but now revealed we cannot hear where, yet, but in the Old
Testament, and from thence a whole Psalm, 109th, full of
curses against God’s enemies and theirs,—and generally
SERMON XVII. 369
those pass for synonymous terms,—the special devotion
they are exercised in; and if ever they come within their
reach, no more mercy for them than for so many of the
seven nations, in rooting out of which a great part of their
religion consists. I wish there were not another prodigy
also abroad under the name of the Old Testament spirit,
the opinion of the necessity of sacrifice, real bloody sacri-
fice,—even such as was but seldom heard of among Indians
and Scythians themselves,—such sacrifices, of which the can-
nibal Cyclops’ feasts may seem to have been but attendants,
—furnished with the τομαὶ and μερίδες, that come from such
savage altars,—sacrificing of men, of Christians, of protes-
tants as good as any in the world, to expiate for the blood
shed by papists in Queen Mary’s days; and some prophets
ready to avow, that without such sacrifice there is no re-
mission, no averting of judgments from the land. What is
this but like the Pharisees, ‘to build and garnish the sepul- [Matt.
chres of the prophets, and say, that if they had lived in their **"* 2%-J
fathers’ days, they would never have partaken of the blood of
the prophets,” and yet go on “to fill up the measure of their
fathers?” The very men to whom Christ directs thee, ‘“ O [ver. 37.]
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest,” in the present tense,
a happy turn, if but the progeny of those murderers, and what
can then remain, but the “ Behold, your house is left unto [ver. 38.]
you desolate,”’—irreversible destruction upon the land. A
third sort there is again, that have so confined the gospel
to promises, and a fourth, so persuaded that the Unum neces-
sariwm is to be of right persuasions in religion; 1. 6. of those
that every such man is of,—for he that did not think his own
the truest, would sure be of them no longer,—that betwixt
those two popular deceits, that of the fiduciary, and this of
the solifidian, the gospel spirit is not conceived to consist in
doing any thing; and so still those practical graces, humi-
lity, meekness, mercifulness, peaceableness, and Christian
patience, are very handsomely superseded; that one Moses’
rod, called faith, is turned serpent, and hath devoured all [Ex. vii.
these for rods of the magicians; and so still you see men |
sufficiently armed and fortified against the gospel spirit. All
that is now left us, is not to exhort, but weep in secret, not
to dispute, but pray for it, that God will at last give us eyes
HAMMOND. B b
370 SERMON XVII.
to discern this treasure put into our hands by Christ, which
would yet, like a whole navy and fleet of plate, be able to
recover the fortune and reputation of this bankrupt island,
fix this floating Delos, to restore this broken shipwrecked ves-
sel to harbour and safety, this whole kingdom to peace again.
Peace! seasonable, instant peace, the only remedy on earth
to keep this whole land from being perfect vastation, perfect
Afric of nothing but wild and monster; and the gospel
spirit that Christ came to preach and exemplify, and plant
among men, the only way imaginable to restore that peace.
Lord that it might at length break forth among us! the
want of it is certainly the author of all the miseries we suffer
under; and that brings me to the third and last particular,
that this ignorance of the gospel spirit is apt to betray Chris-
tians to unsafe, unjustifiable enterprises : you that would have
fire from heaven, do it upon this one ignorance, “ You know
not,” &c.
It were too sad, and too long a task, to trace every of our
evils home to the original; every of the fiends amongst us
to the mansion in the place of darkness peculiar to it. If I
should, it would be found too true, what Du Plesse is affirmed
to have said to Languet, as the reason why he would not
write the story of the civil wars of France, “that if he were
careful to observe the causes, and honest to report them, he
must hound the fox to a kennel which it was not willing to
acknowledge ;” drive such an action to the brothel-house,
that came speciously and pretendedly out of a church: find
that to be in truth the animosity of a rival that took upon it
to be the quarrel for religion ; or as in Polybius° oft, the πρό-
facts to be a thing very distant from the air/a, the colour from
the cause.
In the mean, it will not be a peculiar mark of odium on the
embroilers of this present State and Church, to lay it at their
doors, which I am confident never failed to own the like
effects in all other Christian states, the ignorance—i.e. in
the Scripture phrase, not practising—of those Christian rules
which the gospel spirit presents us with.
I might tire you but with the names of those effects that
flow constantly from this ignorance, such are, usurping the
° [Polybius. Hist., lib. iii. 6. 6. § 6; and ibid., c. 7. § 3.]
SERMON XVII. BYAll
power that belongs not to us, which humility would cer-
tainly disclaim; such, resisting the powers under which we
are placed by God, to which meekness would never be pro-
voked; such the judging and censuring men’s thoughts and
intentions any further than their actions enforce, most un-
reconcileable with the forgiving part of mercifulness; such
the doing any kind of evil, that the greatest or publickest
good may come, designing of rapine or blood to the sancti-
fiedest end, which St. Paul and peaceableness would never
endure; such impatience of the cross, shaking a kingdom to
get it off from our own shoulders, and put it on other men, dia-
metrally opposite to the suffering and patience of a Christian.
To retire from this common to the enclosure, and to go no
further than the text suggests to me, “To call fire from hea-
- yen upon Samaritans,” is here acknowledged the effect of the
οὐκ οἴδατε, the want of knowledge, or consideration of the
quality of their spirit.
And what may that signify to us? Why, fire, you know, is
the emblem of a civil war, which is called a πύρωσις, a “ com-
bustion,” or, being further broken out into flames, a ‘“ confla-
gration ;” and I conceive should be so rendered in that place
of St. Peter, where we read “ the fiery trial.” [1 Pet. iv.
Now fire, you know, belongs most naturally to hell; and ch
therefore when the fire and brimstone came down upon So-
dom, mey of the fathers calls it gehennam de celo:
and cally the civil fire, the combustion in a state, its
oris m thence too; part of that ‘‘ wisdom that is not [Jar iii.
fro _ above.” These tares so apt for burning, are sowed by ἐν
Satan, the enemy-man. From whence come “ wars and striv- [Jam. iv.
ings among γοι;,᾽--πόλεμοι καὶ μάχαι, wars of all sizes,— ot
“are they not from your lusts, that war in your flesh?” saith
St. James. The lusts from the flesh, but the war from hell,
the devil, the spiritus sufflans that sets them a warring.
Believe it, they would not be able to do it in this manner,
prove such fiery boutefeus, if they were not inflamed from
beneath, if they were not set on fire by hell. And therefore
to call fire from heaven, to entitle God or heaven to that fire,
is to do both of them great injury; nay, though it be on
Samaritans, that are not so friendly to Christ as might be
expected. And so to call fire from heaven upon Samaritans,
Bb 2
[ Luke iii.
4.}
[Heb. xii.
14.]
8173 SERMON XVII.
is (by accommodation at least) to pretend God, or heaven,
or religion, for the cause of war, which of all things hath least
to do it, if the gospel spirit may have leave to be considered.
Indeed, very few kinds of war there are that will be justified
by gospel principles. It was truly said, (though by a rough
soldier,) “that if the Lord of Hosts were permitted to sit in
the council of war, there would soon be a cessation of arms,
and disbanding of armies.” Though that all war is not un-
lawful, will appear by John Baptist’s address to the soldiers,
who gave rules to regulate their militia, but did not disband
them ; and the example of the convert centurion, a centurion
still after his conversion: where yet this still remains as an
infallible resolution, that wars are to be used like the regia
medicamenta, never but when the physician sees there is no
other means available; never upon the wantonness of the
patient, but command of the physician, and never but when
peace appears to be impossible; for if it be possible, the pre-
cept is of force, “ Follow peace with all men.” And then to
shed the blood of Christians, when blood may be spared, what
an hideous thing it is you may guess by that emperor, that
having beheaded a Christian, was by the sight of a fish’s head
that came to his table so astonished, fancying that it was
the head of that slaughtered Christian gaping on him, that
he scarce recovered to his wits; or of that poor penitent
[Ps.li.14.] David in his pathetic expression, “Deliver me from blood-
guiltiness, O Lord.” A wonderful deliverance, it seems, to
get clear from that. And what an ocean of fishes’ heads may
appear one day gaping on some men I have no joy to tell:
“ Deliver us from blood-guiltiness, Ὁ God.”
I have done with my third particular also, and have now
no more to importune you with, but my requests to you, and
to heaven for you, that the time past of all our lives be suffi-
cient to have spent in the will of the Gentiles, after the dic-
tates of that heathen spirit, the natural or Jewish principles.
That you be content at length to go up to the mount with
Christ, and be auditors of His sermon; to that other mount
with the same Christ, and be transfigured after Him to that
spirit of humility, spirit of meekness, spirit of all kind of
mercifulness; that peaceable, patient spirit, which will give
you a comfortable passage through this valley of Achor here; —
SERMON XVII. 970
yea, though it prove a Red sea of blood, and will fit you fora
crown, that true Olympic olive crown; the “ peaceable fruits [Heb. xii.
of righteousness,” an “eternal weight of glory hereafter.” " Pai
Which God of His infinite mercy grant, through the merit
and promise of His Son.
To whom with the Father, &c.
Luke viii.
32.
SERMON XVIII.
Ezex. xvii. 31.
For why will ye die?
Since the devil was turned out of heaven, all his care and
counsels have been employed to keep us from coming thither ;
and finding God’s love very forward and increasing towards
us, he hath set us upon all ways of enmity and opposition
against Him. The first warlike exploit he put us upon, was
the building of Babel, when man having fortified himself, and
the arm of flesh grown stout, began to reproach and chal-
lenge, and even assault the God of heaven. But the success
of that boldness cost so dear, that we have ever since been
discouraged from such open proud attempts. Our malice and
despite hath kept in somewhat more close and secretly, hath
retired and settled in the soul; the inward man hath ever
since erected its Babel; proud and high imaginations out-
bidding heaven and God. These were a long while forged
in the brain, when instead of the acknowledgment of one
true God, all monsters of atheism filled the understanding,
sometimes with a multitude and shoal of gods; sometimes
deprived it quite, and left it utterly void of any: but now at
last, the devil and all the atheism in the world, being at last
exorcised and banished out of the brain, by the evidence and
power of truth, hath like the legion, which being cast out of the
man, had leave to enter the swine, fixed violently, and taken
possession, and intrenched itself in the brutish bestial part,
the affections. All the swellings, and tumours, and ulcers,
that ever shewed themselves in any portion of the circum-
ference, are now retired into the centre. All the atheism or
SERMON XVIII. 315
heresy that ever soared or floated in the brain, or surface of
the soul, is now sunk into the heart; and there the devil is
seated at ease, there to set up and fortify and contemn God
for ever. So that in brief, the issue of all this is, there is an
infinite opposition and thwarting, a professed combat and
bandying of forces betwixt the will of man and the will of
God; God doing, in a kind, His best on one side, and man
on the other. God wonderfully willing and desirous that we
should live; man most perversely wilful to his own destruc-
tion.
This is a truth of a most dismal importance that con-
cerns you to be instructed in, and will not be more power-
fully enforced on you from any place of Scripture than the
text which I have read to you, “ Why will ye die?” It is
God speaks it, and with an infinite emphasis and πάθος, to
note His passion and affectionateness in desiring our good,
and willing that we should live. And then secondly, “ Why
will you die?” Man’s resoluteness and stubborn wretchless-
ness towards his own ruin, rushing or tumbling as in a
precipice violently to hell, like the swine which formerly our
wills were resembled to, running full speed down a steep Luke viii.
place into the lake. And these are like to prove the parts δ.
of my ensuing discourse; first, God’s willingness that we
should be saved; secondly, man’s wilfulness toward his own
damnation. And of these plainly to your hearts, not your
ears; not so much to advance your knowledge, which
though it could be raised to the tallest pitch, might yet
possibly bear thee company to hell; but rather to increase
your zeal, to work some one good inclination in you, to
persuade you to be content to suffer yourselves to be saved;
to be but so tame as to be taken by heaven that now even
besieges you. And with my affectionate prayers for success
to this design, I will presume of your ears and patience, and
begin first with the first, God’s willingness that we should
live. “ Why will ye die?”
Amongst all other prejudices and misconceits that our
fancy can entertain of God, I conceive not any so frequent
or injurious to His attributes, as to imagine Him to deal
double with mankind in His word; seriously to will one
thing, and to make show of another; to deliver Himself in
[Job xiii,
8.]
1 John iy.
9.
Ezek. xvi.
[6.]
ver, ὅ.
Eccles.
xiv. 12.
376 SERMON XVIII.
one phrase, and reserve Himself in another. It were an
unnecessary, Officious undertaking to go about to be God’s
advocate, to apologize for Him, to vindicate His actions, or
in Job’s phrase, to “accept the person of God.” Our pro-
ceedings will be more Christian, if we take for a ground or
principle, that scorns to be beholding to an artist for a proof,
that every word of God is an argument of His will, every
action an interpreter of His word. So that howsoever he
reveals Himself, either in His Scripture or His works, so
certainly He wisheth and intends to us in His secret coun-
sels. Every protestation of His love, every indignation at
our stubbornness, every mercy conferred on us, and that not
insidiously, but with an intent to do us good, are but ways
and methods to express His will; are but rays, and emissions,
and gleams of that eternal love which He exhibits to the
world. Now there is no way to demonstrate this willingness
of God that we should live, a priori, or by any thing either
in God or us, pre-existent as the cause of it, unless it be His
love, which yet is rather its genus than its cause, somewhat
of larger extent, though otherwise coincident with it. The
more vulgar powerful convincing way, is to enforce it to your
hearts by its effects, and those divers and familiar: some few
of which we will insist on.
And first, and principally, the sending of His Son; “In
this was manifest the love of God toward us, because that God
sent His only-begotten Son into the world, that we might
live through Him.” Mark God’s love to us in sending His
Son that we might live through Him. His love the cause
of this mission; this mission, the manifestation and argu-
ment of that love; and that we live, the end of both. Had
God been any way inclined to rigour or severity, there had
needed no great skill, no artificial contrivance for a fair plau-
sible execution of it; it had been but passing us by, the
taking no notice of us, the “leaving of us in our blood,” and
then hell had presently opened its mouth upon us. “ We
were all cast out in the open field to the loathing of our per-
sons, in the day that we were born,” ready for all the vul-
tures infernal to fix on, that hideous Old Testament, διαθήκη
ἅδου, “the testament of hell,” or in the mercifulest con-
struction, the “covenant of grace” had passed on us, natu-
SERMON XVIII. 377
rally then—what infidelity now makes us—condemned ΔἸγοδαν;
our damnation sealed to us with our life, born to no other
inheritance but hell; as if the devil had out of policy fallen
before Adam, or rather descended, and that in post, “ like Luke x. 18.
lightning,” lest if his journey from heaven had been to have
been performed after, some other creature should have inter-
cepted him of his prey. But God’s bowels were enlarged
above the size, wider than either the covetous gates of hell,
or that horrid yawning head that is all mouth. It was not
within the devil’s skill to fear or suspect what a way of mercy
and deliverance God had found out for us. Somewhat he
understood by the event, the decay of his prophetic arts be-
coming now his oracle; and even his silence growing vocal
to him. But all this could not declare the mystery at large ;
when Christ was born, he would have been rid of Him be-
times, musters all his forces, Pharisees and people, Herods
and Pilates, Rome and Jerusalem, and all the friends he had
in the world, to make away with Him; and yet when he was
just come to the push, to the consummation of his plot, he
was afraid to act it; as in the epistle ascribed to Ignatius the
Martyr*, and directed to the Philippians, it is observed, that
whilst he was at a pretty distance, ἔσπευσε γενέσθαι σταυρὸν,
“the devil hastened the structure of Christ’s cross,” as much
as he could; set Judas and all the artificers of hell about the
work, μέλλοντος δὲ γίνεσθαι, but “ when all was even ready,”
Christ for the cross, and the cross for Christ, then he began
to put in demurs; shews Judas an halter, frights Pilate’s wife
in a dream, she could not sleep in quiet for him; and in sum,
uses all means possible to prevent Christ’s crucifixion. Yet
this, saith Ignatius, not out of any repentance, or regret of
conscience, but only being started with the foresight of his
own ruin by this means. Christ’s suffering being in effect
the destruction of his kingdom, His death our triumph over
hell, and His cross our trophy. By this you may discern
what a miracle of God’s love was this giving of His Son; the
conceiving of which was above the devil’s reach, and wherein
he was providentially engaged, and (if we may so speak) θεο-
dopovpevos, carried blindfold by God, to be an instrument of
his own ruin, and in a kind, be a co-worker of our salvation.
4 {Pseudo-Ignatius, Epist. ad Philipp., c. iv. Patr. Apost., tom. 11, p. 119.]
158. 1111.
[1.]
Wisd. xvi.
20.
[cf. Wisd.
xi. 26.]
378 SERMON XVIII.
Not to enlarge or expatiate upon circumstances; man being
thus involved in a necessity of damnation, and no remedy
within the sphere, either of his power or conceit, left to res-
cue him ;—nay, as some have been so bold to say, that God
Himself had no other means besides this in His storehouse
of miracles to save us, without intrenching on some one of His
attributes ;—for God then to find out a course that we could
never prompt Him to, being solicited to it by nothing in us
but our sins and misery, and without any interposition, any
further consultation or demur, to part with a piece of Him-
self to redeem us; Brachiwm Domini, “the arm of the Lord,”
as Isaiah calls our Saviour. Nay, to send down His very
bowels amongst us to witness His compassion ; to satisfy for
us by His own death, and attach Himself for our liberty; to
undergo such hard conditions rather than be forced to a
cheap severity ; and, that He might appear to love His ene-
mies, to hate His Son. In brief, to fulfil the work without
any aid required from us, and make salvation ready to our
hands, as manna is called in the sixth of Wisdom, ἑτοῖμος ἄρ-
τος ἀπ᾽ οὐρανοῦ, “bread baked, and sent down ready from
heaven,” to drop it in our mouths, and exact nothing of us but
to accept of it: this is an act of love and singleness, that all
the malice we carry about us knows not how to suspect; so
far from possibility of a treacherous intent, or double deal-
ing, that if I were a heathen, nay a devil, I would bestow
no other appellation on the Christians’ God, than what the
author of the book of Wisdom doth so often,—@rovyos, the
“friend,” or the lover of souls. But this is a vulgar, though
precious subject, and therefore I shall no longer insist on it.
Only before I leave it, would I could see the effect of it ex-
pressed in our souls, as well as acknowledged in our looks;
your hearts ravished as thoroughly as your brains convinced ;
your breasts as open to value and receive this superlative
mercy, as your tongues to confess it; then could I triumph
over hell and death, and scoff them out of countenance; then
should the devil be reduced to his old pittance, confined to
an empty corner of the world; and suffer as much by the
solitariness as darkness of his abode; all his engines and arts
of torment should be busied upon himself, and his whole ex-
ercise, to curse Christ for ever, that hath thus deprived him
SERMON XVIII. 879
of associates. But alas! we are too solicitous in the devil’s
behalf, careful to furnish him with companions, to keep him
warm in the midst of fire; it is to be feared we shall at last
thrust him out of his inheritance. It is a probable argument
that God desires our salvation, because that hell, wheresoever
it is,—whether at the centre of the earth, or concave of the
moon,—must needs be far less than heaven; and that makes
us so besiege the gate as if we feared we should find no room
there. We begin our journey betimes, lest if we should be
forestalled, and had rather venture a throng or crowd in hell,
than to expect that glorious liberty of the sons of God. It [Rom. viii.
is to be feared that at the day of judgment, when each body Ἵ
comes to accompany its soul in torment, hell must be let out,
and enlarge its territories, to receive its guests. Beloved,
there is not a creature here that hath reason to doubt but
Christ was sent to die for him, and by that death hath pur-
chased his right to life. Only do but come in, do but suffer
yourselves to live, and Christ to have died; do not uncrucify
Christ by crucifying Him again by your unbelief; do not
disclaim the salvation that even claims right and title to
you; and then the angels shall be as full of joy to see you in
heaven, as God is willing, nay, desirous to bring you thither ;
and Christ as ready to bestow that inheritance upon you at
His second coming, as at His first to purchase it. Nothing
but infidelity restrains Christ’s sufferings, and confines them
to afew. Were but this one devil cast out of the world, I
should be straight of Origen’s religion, and preach unto you
universal catholic salvation.
A second argument of God’s good meaning towards us, of
His willingness that we should live, is the calling of the
Gentiles, the dispatching of posts and heralds over the whole
ignorant heathen world, and giving them notice of this trea-
sure of Christ’s blood. Do but observe what a degree of pro-
faneness and unnatural abominations the Gentile world was
then arrived to, as you may read in all their stories; and in
the first to the Romans, how well grown and ripe for the devil
Christ found them ; all of them damnably superstitious and
idolatrous in their worship ; damnably unclean in their lives ;
nay, engaged for ever in this road of damnation by a law they
had made, μὴ ἀλλοτριονομεῖν, “never to entertain any new
Acts xvii.
18.
Acts x. 9,
86.
[ Acts x.
14. ]
Acts x. 45.
Eph. iii.
10.
ver. 9.
380 SERMON XVIII.
laws,” or religion: not to innovate, though it were to get
salvation, as besides their own histories, may be gathered out
of Acts xvii. 18. And lastly, consider how they were hooked
in by the devil, to join in crucifying of Christ, that they
might be guilty of that blood which might otherwise have
saved them, and then you will find no argument to persuade
you it was possible that God should have any design of mercy
on them. Peter was so resolved of the point that the whole
succession of the Gentiles should be damned, that God could
scarce persuade him to go and preach to one of them. He
was fain to be cast into a trance, and see a vision about it;
and for all that he is much troubled about the τὸ κοινὸν καὶ
ἀκάθαρτον, “their profaneness and uncleanness,” that they
were not fit for an Apostle to defile himself about their con-
version.
And this was the general opinion of all the Jews; they of
the ‘circumcision were astonished at the news.” Nay, this
is it that the angels wondered at so, when they saw it
wrought at the Church by Paul’s ministry ; never dreaming
it possible, till it was effected, as may appear, Eph. ii. 10.
This was the “mystery, which from the beginning of the
world had been hid in God,” ver. 9. One of God’s cabinet
councils, a mercy decreed in secret, that no creature ever
wist of till it was performed.
And in this behalf are we all—being lineally descended
from the Gentiles—bound over to an infinite measure both
of humiliation and gratitude, for our deliverance from the
guilt and reign of that second original sin, that heathenism
of our ancestors, and catholic damnation, that sixteen hun-
dred years ago we were all involved in. Beloved, we were
long ago set right again, and the obligation hes heavy upon
us, to shew this change to have been wrought in us to some
purpose; to prove ourselves Christians in grain, so fixed and
established, that all the devils in hell shall not be able to re-
duce us again to that abhorred condition. If we that are thus
called out, shall fall back, after so much gospel, to heathen
practices, and set up shrines and altars in our hearts to every
poor delight that our sottishness can call a God; if we are
not called out of their sins, as well as out of their ignorance ;
b [Cf Dio Cassius, Hist. Rom., lib. 111. cap. 36. p. 689, ed. Reimar.]
SERMON XVIII. 881
then have we advanced but the further toward hell; we are
still but heathen gospellers ; our Christian infidelity and prac-
tical atheism will but help to charge their guilt upon us, and
damn us the deeper for being Christians. Do but examine
yourselves on this one interrogatory, whether this calling the
Gentiles hath found any effect in your hearts, any influence
on your lives; whether your conversations are not still as
heathenish as ever? If you have no other grounds or motives
to embrace the Gospel, but only because you are born within
the pale of the Church, no other evidences of your disciple-
ship but your livery; then God is little beholding to you for
your service. The same motives would have served to have
made you Turks, if it had been your chance to have been
born amongst them: and now all that fair Christian outside
is not thankworthy. It is but your good fortune that you are
not now at the same work with the old Gentiles, or present
Indians, a worshipping either Jupiter or the sun! It was a
shrewd speech of Clemens, that the life of every unregene-
rate man is an heathen life; and the sins of unsanctified
men are heathen sins; and the estate of a libertine Chris-
tian an heathen estate: and unless our ‘resolutions and
practices are consonant to our profession of Christ, we are
all still heathens; the Lord make us sensible of this our
condition.
The third, and in sum, the powerfulest argument to prove
God’s willingness that we should live, is, that “ He hath be-
stowed His Spirit upon us ;” that as soon as He called up the
Son, He sent the Comforter. This may seem to be the main
business that Christ ascended to heaven about; so that a
man would guess from the 16th chapter of St. John, verse John xvi.7.
7, that if it had not been for that, Christ had tarried amongst
us till this time; but that it was more expedient to send the
Spirit to speak those things powerfully to our hearts, which
often and in vain had been sounded in our ears. It is a fancy
of the Paracelsians, that if we could suck out the lives and
spirits of other creatures, as we feed on their flesh, we should
never die: their lives would nourish and transubstantiate into
our lives, their spirit increase our spirits, and so our lives
grow with our years, and the older we were, by consequence,
the fuller of life; and so no difficulty to become immortal.
1 Cor. xv.
31.
382 SERMON XVIII.
Thus hath God dealt with us; first sent His Son, His in-
carnate Son, His own flesh to feed and nourish us; and for
all this we “ die daily.” He hath now given us His own very
life and incorporeous essence, a piece of pure God, His very
Spirit to feed upon, and digest, that if it be possible we might
live. There is not a vein in our souls, unless it be quite
pinned and shrivelled up, but hath some blood produced
in it by that holy nourishment; every breath that ever we
have breathed toward heaven, hath been thus inspired; be-
sides those louder voices of God, either sounding in His word,
or thundering in His judgments, there is His calm, soft
voice of inspiration, like the night vision of old, which stole
in upon the mind, mingled with sleep, and gentle slumber.
He draws not out into the field, or meets us as an enemy; but
entraps us by surprise, and disarms us in our quarters, by a
spiritual stratagem, conquers at unawares, and even betrays,
and circumvents, and cheats us into heaven. That precept
of Pythagoras*, πρὸς τὴν ἀνέμων πνεόντων ἠχὼ TposkuveiD,
“ΤῸ worship at the noise and whistling of the wind,” had
sense and divinity in it, that Jamblichus that cites it never
dreamt of; that every sound and whispering of this Spirit,
which rustles either about our ears, or in our hearts,—as the
philosopher saith, Zecum est, intus est—when it breathes and
blows within us, the stoutest faculty of our souls, the proud-
est piece of flesh about us, should bow down and worship.
Concerning the manner of the Spirit’s working, I am not, I
need not to dispute. Thus far it will be seasonable and profit-
able for you to know, that many other illuminations and holy
graces are to be imputed to God’s Spirit, besides that by
which we are effectually converted. God speaks to us many
times when we answer Him not, and shines about our eyes,
when we either wink or sleep. Our many sudden, short-
winded ejaculations toward heaven, our frequent but weak
inclinations to good, our ephemerous wishes, that no man
can distinguish from true piety but by their sudden death;
our every day resolutions of obedience, whilst we continue
in sin, are arguments that God’s Spirit hath shined on us,
though the warmth that it produced be soon chilled with the
damp it meets within us. For example, there is no doubt,
¢ fJamblichus Protrept. Explanation of Symbol. viii. }
SERMON XVIIT. 383
beloved, but the Spirit of God accompanies His word, as at
this time, to your ears; if you will but open at its knock, and
receive, and entertain it in your hearts, it shall prove unto
you, according to its most glorious attribute, “the power [Rom. i.
of God unto salvation :” but if you will refuse it, your stub- ε
bornness may repel and frustrate God’s work, but not an-
nihilate it; though you will not be saved by it, it is God’s
still, and so shall continue to witness against you at the day
of doom. Every word that was ever darted from that Spirit,
as a beam or javelin of that piercing sun, every atom of that
flaming sword, as the word is phrased, shall not, though it be
rebated, vanish; the day of vengeance shall instruct your
souls that it was sent from God, and since it was once re-
fused, hath been kept in store, not to upbraid, but damn
you.
Many other petty occasions the Spirit ordinarily takes to
put off the cloud, and open His face toward us: nay, it were
not a groundless doubt whether He do not always shine, and
the cloud be only in our hearts, which makes us think the
sun is gone down, or quite extinct, if at any time we feel not
his rays within us. Beloved, there be many things amongst
us that single fire can do nothing upon; they are of such a
stubborn, frozen nature, there must be some material thing
for the fire to consist in, a sharp iron, red hot, that may bore
as well as burn, or else there is small hopes of conquering
them. Many men are so hardened and congealed in sin, that
the ordinary beam of the Spirit cannot hope to melt them ;
the fire must come consubstantiate with some solid instrument,
some sound, corpulent, piercing judgment, or else it will be
very unlikely to thrive. True it is, the Spirit is an omni-
potent agent, which can so invisibly infuse and insinuate its
virtue through the inward man, that the whole most enraged
adversary shall presently fall to the earth, the whole carnal [Acts ix.
man lie prostrate, and the sinner be without delay converted ; 11:
and this is a miracle which I desire from my heart might be
presently shewed upon every soul here present.
But that which is to my present purpose is only this, that
God hath also other manners and ways of working, which
are truly to be said to have descended from heaven, though
they are not so successful as to bring us thither; other more
884 SERMON XVIII.
calm, and less boisterous influences, which if they were re-
ceived into an honest heart, might prove semen immortalita-
tis, and in time increase, and grow up to immortality.
There is no such incumbrance to trash us in our Christian
progress as a fancy that some men get possessed with; that
if they are elected they shall be called and saved in spite of
their teeth; every man expecting an extraordinary call, be-
cause Saul met with one; and perhaps running the more
fiercely because Saul was then called, when he was most vio-
lent in his full speed of malice against Christians.
In this behalf, all that I desire of you is, first, to consider,
that though our regeneration be a miracle, yet there are de-
grees of miracles, and thou hast no reason to expect that
the greatest and strongest miracle in the world, shall in the
highest degree be shewed in thy salvation. Who art thou,
that God should take such extraordinary pains with thee?
Secondly, to resolve that many precious rays and beams
of the Spirit, though when they enter they come with power,
yet through our neglect may prove trausitory—pass by that
heart which is not open for them.
And then thirdly, you will easily be convinced, that no
duty concerns us all so strictly, as to observe, as near as we
can, when thus the Spirit appears to us; to collect and mus-
ter up the most lively, quick-sighted, sprightfulest of our fa-
culties: and with all the perspectives that spiritual optics can
furnish us with, to lay wait for every glance and glimpse of
its fire or light. We have ways in nature to apprehend the
beams of the sun, be they never so weak and languishing,
and by uniting them into a burning-glass, to turn them into
a fire. Oh that we were as witty and sagacious in our spirl-
tual estate! then it were easy for those sparks which we so
often either contemn or stifle, to thrive within us, and at
last break forth into a flame.
In brief, incogitancy and inobservance of God’s seasons,
supine numbness and negligence in spiritual affairs, may on
good grounds be resolved on, as the main or sole cause of our
final impenitence and condemnation ; it being just with God
to take those away in a sleep who thus walked in a dream,
and at last to refuse them whom He hath so long solicited.
He that hath scorned and wasted his inheritance cannot com-
SERMON XVIII. 385
plain if he dies a bankrupt; nor he that hath spent his can-
dle at play, count it hard usage that he is fain to go to bed
darkling. It were easy to multiply arguments on this theme,
and from every minute of our lives to discern some pawn and
evidence of God’s fatherly will and desire that we should live.
Let it suffice, that we have been large, if not abundant in
these three chief ones: first, the giving of His Son to the
world; secondly, dispatching the gospel to the Gentiles;
and lastly, the sending of His Spirit. We come now to a
view of the opposite trenches, which 116 pitched at the gates
of hell, obstinate and peremptory to besiege and take it:
man’s resolvedness and wilfulness to die, my second part,
“Why will you die ?”
There is no one conceit that engages us so deep to continue
in sin, that keeps us from repentance, and hinders any sea-
sonable reformation of our wicked lives, as a persuasion that
God’s will is a cause of all events. Though we are not so
blasphemous as to venture to define God the author of sin,
yet we are generally inclined for a fancy, that because all
things depend on God’s decree, whatsoever we have done
could not be otherwise; all our care could not have cut off
ne sin from the catalogue. And so being resolved, that when
we thus sinned we could not choose, we can scarce tell how
to repent for such necessary fatal misdemeanors; the same
excuses which we have for having sinned formerly, we have
for continuing still, and so are generally better prepared for
apologies than reformation. Beloved, it will certainly much
conduce to our edification, instead of this speculation—whose
grounds or truth I will not now examine—to fix this prac-
tical theorem in our hearts, that the will of man is the prin-
cipal cause of all our evil, that death, either as it is the pun-
ishment of sin, eternal death, or as it is the sin itself, a
privation of the life of grace, spiritual death, is wholly to be
imputed to our wilful will. It is a problem in Aristotle, why
some creatures are longer in conceiving and bringing forth
than others, and the sensiblest reason he gives for it, is σκλη-
ρότης ὑστέρας “, “the hardness of the womb,” which is like
dry earth, that will not presently give any nourishment to
either seed or plant; and so is it in the spiritual conception
4 [ Aristot. Problem., sect. 10. § 9.1
HAMMOND. ce
[ Matt. xiii.
4, 5,
1 John ii.
15.
Eph. iii.17.
386 SERMON XVIII.
and production of Christ, that is, of life in us. The hardness
and toughness of the heart, the womb where He is to be
born, that ξηρὰ γῆ °, that “ dry earth,” in the philosopher’s, or
that “ way-side,” or at best ‘‘ stony ground” in Christ’s phrase,
is the only stop and delay in begetting of life within us, the
only cause of either barrenness or hard travail in the Spirit.
Be the brain never so soft and pliable, never so waxy and capa-
ble of impressions ; yet if the heart be but carnal, if it have
any thing much of that “lust of the flesh” in its composi-
tion, it will be hard for the spiritual life to be conceived in
that man. For faith, the only means by which Christ lives
and dwells in us, is to be seated in the heart, i. e. the will
and affections, according to the express words, “ that Christ
may dwell in your hearts by faith.” So that, be your brains
never so swelled and puffed up with persuasions of Christ our
Saviour, be they so big that they are ready to lie in, and tra-
vail of Christ, as Jove’s did of Minerva in the poem'; yet if
the heart have not joined in the conception, if the seed sown
have not taken root and drawn nourishment from the will,
it is but an aerial or fantastical birth, or indeed rather a
disease or tympany; nay, though it come to some proof, and
afterward extend and increase in limbs and proportions never
so speciously, yet if it be only in the brain, neither is this to
be accounted solid nourishment and augmentation, but such
as a chameleon may be thought to have, that feeds on air, and
itself is little better, and in sum, not growth but swellings.
So then if the will, either by nature or custom of sinning,
by familiarity and acquaintance, making them dote on sen-
sual objects otherwise unamiable; by business and worldly
ambitious thoughts, great enemies to faith; or by pride and
contentment, both very incident to noble personages and
great wits, to courtiers and scholars; in brief, if this will,
the stronger and more active part of the soul, remain car-
nal, either in indulgence to many, or, which is the snare of
judicious men in chief, of some one prime sin, then cannot
all the faith in the world bring that man to heaven; it may
work so much miracle, as Simon Magus is said to have done,
who undertook to raise the dead, give motion to the head,
make the eyes look up or the tongue speak; but the lower
part of the man, and that the heaviest, will by no charm or
¢ [Aristot. ibid. ] f [Cf. the Homeric Hymn to Pallas. ]
SERMON XVIII, 387
spell be brought to stir, but weigh and sink even into hell,
will still be carcass and corruption ; “ damnation is his birth- Ecclus.
right.” And it is impossible, though not absolutely, yet ex ἢν “i
hypothesi, the second covenant being now sealed, even for
God Himself to save him or give him life. It is not David’s
music that exorcised and quieted Saul’s evil spirit, nor Pytha-
goras’s ® spondees that tamed a man, καὶ ἐπανώρθωσαν, “ set
him right in his wits for ever, that can work any effect on a
fleshy heart.” So that Chrysostom" would not wonder at the
voice that cried, “O altar, altar, hear the voice of the Lord,” [1 Kings
because Jeroboam’s heart was harder than that; nor will I ee)
find fault with Bonaventure that made a solemn prayer for a
stony heart, as if it were more likely to receive impression
than that which he had already of flesh.
It were long to insist on the wilfulness of our fleshy hearts,
how they make a faction within themselves, and bandy facul-
ties for the devil; how when grace and life appear, and make
proffer of themselves, all the carnal affections, like them in
the Gospel, “join all with one consent to make excuses ;” Luke xiv.
nothing in our whole lives we are so solicitous for, as to get Το
off fairly, to have made a cleanly apology to the invitations
of God’s Spirit, and yet for a need rather than go, we will
venture to be unmannerly. We have all married a wife,
espoused ourselves to some amiable delight or other; we
cannot, we will not come. The devil is wiser in his genera-
tion than we; he knows the price and value of a soul, and will
pay any rate for it rather than lose his market; he will give
all the riches in the world rather than miss. And we, at how
low a rate do we prize it? it is the cheapest commodity we
carry about us. The beggarliest, content under heaven is
fair, is rich enough to be given in exchange for the soul.
Spiritus non ponderat, saith the philosopher; the soul being
a spirit, when we put it into the balance, weighs nothing;
nay, more than so, it is lighter than vanity, lighter than no-
thing, i.e. it doth not only weigh nothing, but even lifts up
the scale it is put into, when nothing is weighed against it.
How many sins, how many vanities, how many idols, i.e. in
the Scripture phrase, how many nothings be there in the [1Cor. viii.
& (Cf. Jamblichus, de Vita Pythagore, cap. xxv. δὲ 112, 114. ] Ἵ
h [S. Chrysostom, De Peenitentia, Homil, viii, Op., tom. ii. p. 345, E.]
cc2
Heb. x. 81.
ver. 27.
388 SERMON XVIII.
world, each of which will outweigh and preponderate the
soul !
It were tedious to observe and describe the several ways
that our devilish sagacity hath found out to speed our-
selves to damnation, to make quicker dispatch in that un-
happy road than ever Elias’s fiery chariot could do toward
heaven. Our daily practice is too full of arguments, almost
every minute of our lives as it is an example, so is it a proof
of it. Our pains will be employed to better purpose if we
leave that as a worn, beaten, common-place, and betake our-
selves to a more necessary theme, a close of exhortation.
And that shall be by way of treaty, as an ambassador sent
from God, that you will lay down your arms, that you will
be content to be friends with God, and accept of fair terms
of composition; which are, that as you have thus long been
enemies to God, proclaiming hostility, and perpetually op-
posing every merciful will of His by that wilfulness, so now
being likely to fall into His hands, you will prevent that
ruin, you will come in; and whilst it is not too late, submit
yourselves, that you may not be forced as rebels and outlaws,
but submit as servants. This perhaps may be your last par-
ley for peace, and if you stand out the battery will begin
suddenly, and with it the horrendum est, “It is a fearful,
hideous thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” All
that remains upon our wilful holding out may be (the doom
of apostates from Christianity) a “certain fearful looking for
of judgment and fiery indignation, that shall devour the ad-
versaries.” And methinks the very emphasis in my text
notes as much; ‘ Why will you die?” as if we were just
now falling into the pit, and there were but one minute be-
twixt this time of our jollity and our everlasting hell. Do
but lay this one circumstance to your hearts, do but suppose
yourselves on a bed of sickness, laid at with a violent burn-
ing fever, such a one as shall finally consume the whole
world; as it were battered with thundering and lghtning,
and besieged with fire, where the next throw or plunge of
thy disease may possibly separate thy soul from thy body,
and the mouth of hell just then open and yawning at thee;
and then suppose there were one only minute wherein a seri-
SERMON XVIII. 389
ous resigning up thyself to God might recover you to heaven ;
O then what power and energy! what force and strong effi-
cacy would there be in this voice from God, “ Why will you
die?” I am resolved, that heart that were truly sensible of
it, that were prepared seasonably by all these circumstances
to receive it, would find such inward vigour and spirit from
it, that it would strike death dead in that one minute; this
ultimus conatus, this last spring and plunge, would do more
than a thousand heartless heaves in a lingering sickness, and
perhaps overcome and quit the danger.
And therefore let me beseech you to represent this con-
dition to yourselves, and not any longer be flattered or co-
zened in a slow security: ‘To-day if you will hear His [Ps. xev.
voice, harden not your hearts.” If you let it alone till this 8.
day come in earnest, you may then perhaps heave in vain,
labour and struggle, and not have breath enough to send up
one sigh toward heaven. The hour of our death we are wont
to call tempus improbabilitatis, a very improbable inch of time
to build our heaven in; as after death is impossibilitatis, a
time wherein it is impossible to recover us from hell. If
nothing were required to make us saints but outward per-
formances; if true repentance were but to groan, and faith
but to cry, Lord, Lord; we could not promise ourselves that [Matt. vii.
at our last hour we should be sufficient for that; perhaps a
lethargy may be our fate, and then what life or spirits even
for that? perhaps a fever may send us away raving, in no
case to name God, but only in oaths and curses; and then
it were hideous to tell you what a Bethlehem we should be
carried to. But when that which must save us must be a
work of the soul, and a gift of God, how can we promise
ourselves that God will be so merciful, whom we have till
then contemned, or our souls then capable of any holy im-
pression, having been so long frozen in sin, and petrified
even into adamant? Beloved, as a man may come to such
an estate of grace here, that he may be most sure he shall
not fall, as St. Paul in likelihood was, when he “resolved [Rom. viii.
that nothing could separate him:” so may a man be en- ον
gaged so far in sin that there is no rescuing from the devil.
There is an irreversible estate in evil as well as good, and
perhaps I may have arrived to that before my hour of death ;
Exod. ix.
34.
Cant. iii. 1.
Tit. ii, 14.
Matt. iii. 8.
390 SERMON XVIII.
for I believe Pharaoh was come to it after the seventh plague
hardening his heart; and then I say, it is possible, that thou
that hitherto hast gone on in habituate, stupid, customary
rebellions, mayest be now at this minute arrived to this
pitch, that if thou run on one pace further thou art engaged
for ever past recovery. And therefore at this minute, in the
strength of your age and lusts, this speech may be as season-
able as if death were seizing on you, “ Why will you die?”
At what time soever thou repentest God will have mercy ;
but this may be the last instant wherein thou canst repent,
the next sin may benumb or sear thy heart, that even the
pangs of death shall come on thee insensibly ; that the rest
of thy life shall be a sleep, or lethargy, and thou lie stupid
in it till thou findest thyself awake in flames. Oh, if thou
shouldst pass away in such a sleep! Again, I cannot tell you
whether a death-bed repentance shall save you or no. The
spouse sought Christ on her bed, but found Him not. The
last of Ecclesiastes would make a man suspect, that remem-
bering God when our feeble impotent age comes on us, would
stand us in little stead. Read it, for it is a most learned
powerful chapter. This I am sure of, “God hath chosen to
Himself a people zealous of good works.” And they that find
not some of this holy fire alive within them, till their souls
are going out, have little cause to think themselves of God’s
election. So that perhaps there is something in it, that the
exhortation, “ Bring forth fruits worthy of repentance,” is
expressed by a tense that ordinarily signifies time past, ποιή-
cate, “have brought forth fruits.” It will not be enough
upon an exigence, when there is no way but one with me, to
be inclinable to any good works, to resolve to live well when
I expect to die. I must have done this, and more too in my
life, if I expect any true comfort at my death. There is not
any point we err more familiarly in and easily than our
spiritual condition; what is likely to become of us after
death? any slight fancy that Christ died for us in particu-
lar, we take for a faith that will be sure to save us.
Now there is no way to preserve ourselves from this error
but to measure our faith and hopes by our obedience ; that if
we sincerely obey God, then are we true believers. And this
cannot well be done by any that begins not till he is on his
SERMON XVIII. 391
death-bed ; be his inclinations to good then never so strong,
his faith in Christ never so lusty; yet how knows he whether
it is only fear of death, and a conviction that in spite of his
teeth he must now sin no longer, that hath wrought these
inclinations, produced this faith in him ?
Many a sick man resolves strongly to take the physician’s
dose, in hope that it will cure him; yet when he comes to
taste its bitterness will rather die than take it. If he that
on his death-bed hath made his solemnest, severest vows,
should but recover to a possibility of enjoying those delights
which now have given him over, I much fear his fiercest re-
solutions would be soon out-dated. Such inclinations that
either hover in the brain only, or float on the surface of the
heart, are but like those wavering, temporary thoughts,
“Like a wave of the sea, driven by the wind and tossed ;” Jam. i. 6.
they have no firmness or stable consistence in the soul; it
will be hard to build heaven on so slight a foundation.
All this I have said, not to discourage any tender, languish-
ing soul, but by representing the horrors of death to you now
in health, to instruct you in the doctrine of mortality betimes,
so to speed and hasten your repentance; now, as if to-mor-
row would be too late, as if there were but a small isthmus or
inch of ground between your present mirth and jollity and
your everlasting earnest.
To gather up all on the clue. Christ is now offered to you
as a Jesus: the times and sins of your heathenism and un-
belief, “God winketh at.” The Spirit proclaims all this by Acts xvii.
the Word to your hearts; and now—God knows if ever again ὅδ
—commands all men “ every where to repent.”
Oh that there were such a spirit in our hearts, such a zeal
to our eternal bliss, and indignation at hell, that we would
give one heave and spring before we die; that we would but
answer those invitations of mercy, those desires of God, that
we should live with an inclination, with a breath, with a sigh
toward heaven.
Briefly, if there be any strong, violent, boisterous devil
within us, that keeps possession of our hearts against God;
if the lower sensual part of our soul; if an habit of sin, 1. 6.
a combination or legion of devils, will not be overtopped by
reason or grace in our hearts; if a major part of our carnal
{ Matt.
xvii, 21.]
392 SERMON XVIII.
faculties be still canvassing for hell; if for all our endeavours
and pains it may appear to us that this kind of evil spirit
will not be cast out, save only by fasting and prayer; then
have we yet that remedy left, first, to fast and pine, and keep
him weak within, by denying him all foreign, fresh provision,
all new occasions of sin, and the like, and so to block, and in
time starve him up: and then secondly, to pray that God
will second and fortify our endeavours; that He will force,
and rend, and ravish this carnal devil out of us; that He will
subdue our wills to His will; that He will prepare and make
ready life for us, and us for life; that He will prevent us by
His grace here, and accomplish us with His glory hereafter.
Now to him, ἕο.
SERMON XIX.
JER. v. 2.
Though they say, The Lord liveth; surely they swear falsely.
Nor to waste any time or breath, or—which men in this
delicate and effeminate age are wont to be most sparing and
thrifty of—any part of your precious patience unprofitably,
but briefly to give you a guess whither our discourse is like
to lead you, we will severally lay down and sort to your
view every word of the text single; and so we may gather
them up again, and apply them to their natural proper pur-
poses.
First, then, the particle “ though”’ in the front, and “surely’
in the body of the text, are but bands and junctures to keep
all together into one proposition.
Secondly, the pronoun “they,” in each place, is in the let-
ter the Jews, in application, present Christians; and being
indefinite, might seem to be of the same extent in both places,
did not the matter alter it, and make it universal in the for-
mer, and particular in the latter. For artists say, that an in-
definite sign, where the matter is necessary, is equivalent to
an universal, where but contingent, to a particular. Now to
say “the Lord liveth,” was and is necessary ; though not by
any logical, yet by a political necessity ; the government and
human laws, under which then the Jews and now we Chris-
tians live, require this profession necessarily at our hands:
but to “swear falsely,” not to perform what before they pro-
fessed, is materia contingens, a matter of no necessity, but free-
will and choice, that no human law can see into; and there-
fore we must not interpret by the rules of art, or charity,
>
Jer, iv. 2.
394 SERMON XIX.
that all were perjured, but some only; though it is probable
a major part; and as we may guess by the first verse of this
chapter, well nigh all of them.
Thirdly, to “say” is openly to make profession, and that
very resolutely and boldly, that none may dare to distrust it ;
nay, with an oath to confirm it to jealous opinions, as appears
by the latter words, “ They swear falsely,” while they do but
“say :” and, “Thou shalt swear, The Lord liveth,” &c.
Fourthly, “the Lord,” i. e. both in Christianity and ortho-
dox Judaism the whole Trinity.
Fifthly, “liveth,” i.e. by way of excellency hath a life of
His own, independent and eternal, and in respect of us is the
fountain of all life and being that we have; and not only of
life, but motion, and perfection, and happiness, and salvation,
and all that belongs to it. In brief, to say, “The Lord liv-
eth,” is to acknowledge Him in His essence, and all His attri-
butes, contained together under that one principle; on that
of life, to believe whatever Moses and the prophets then, or
now our Christian faith, hath made known to us of Him,
Sixthly, to falsify and swerve from truth becomes a further
aggravation, especially in the present instance; though they
make mention of that God, who is “ Yea,” and “ Amen,” and
loves a plain veracious speech, yet they swear; though by
loud and dreadful imprecations they bespeak Him a witness
and a judge unto the criminal, pray as devoutly for destruc-
tion for their sin as the most sober penitent can do for its
pardon, yet are they perjured; “ they swear falsely.”
More than all this, they openly renounce the Deity when
they call upon Him; their hearts go not along with their
words and professions; though it be the surest truth in the
world that they swear when they assert that “the Lord liv-
eth,” yet they are perjured in speaking of it; though they
make a fair show of believing in the brain, and from the
teeth outward, they never lay the truth that they are so vio-
lent for at all to their hearts; or as the original hath it, raw,
in vanum, to no purpose it is that they swear, no man that
sees how they live will give any heed to their words, will ima-
gine that they believe any such matter.
So now having paced over, and as it were spelt every
SERMON XIX. 395
word single, there will be no difficulty for the rawest un-
derstanding to put it together, and read it currently enough
in this proposition; amongst the multitude of professors of
Christianity there is very little real piety, very little true
belief.
In the verse next before my text there is an “O yes” made,
a proclamation, nay, a hue and cry, and hurrying about the
streets, if it were possible to find out but a man that were
a sincere believer; and here in my text is brought in a Non
est inventus, ‘Though they say, The Lord liveth,’—a multitude
of professors indeed every where,—“‘yet surely they swear
falsely ; there is no credit to be given to their words; infi-
delity and hypocrisy is in their hearts; for all their fair be-
lieving professions, they had an unfaithful rebellious heart,
and the event manifested it, “they are departed and gone,”
arrant apostates in their lives, by which they were to be
tried ; “Neither say they in their hearts, Let us fear the
Lord,” whatsoever they flourished with their tongues.
Now for a more distinct survey of this horrible wretched
truth, this heathenism of Christians, and infidelity of be-
lievers,—the true ground of all false swearing, and indeed of
every other sin,—we will first examine wherein it consists ;
secondly, whence it springs; the first will give you a view of
its nature, the second its root and growth, that you may
prevent it. The first will serve for an ocular or mathema-
tical demonstration, called by artists ὅτι, “that” itis so; the
second a rational or physical διότι, “ how” it comes about.
The first to convince of the truth of it, the second to instruct
you in its causes.
And first of the first, wherein this infidelity, and to speak
more plainly, perjury of formal believers consists; “ Though
they say,” &c.
Since that rather fancy than divinity of the Romanists,
schoolmen, and casuists, generally defining faith to be a bare
assent to the truth of God’s word seated only in the under-
standing, was by the protestant divines banished out of the
schools, as a faith for a chameleon to be nourished with,
which can feed on air; as a direct piece of sorcery and con-
juring, which will help you to remove mountains only by
thinking you are able; briefly, as a chimera or fantastical
ver, 23.
ver. 24.
396 SERMON XIX.
nothing, fit to be sent to limbo for a present; since, I say,
this magical divinity which still possesses the Romanist,
and also a sort of men who would be thought most distant
from them, hath been exorcised, and silenced, and cast out of
our schools—would I could say out of our hearts—by the
Reformation, the nature of faith hath been most admirably
explained; yet the seat or subject of it never clearly set down,
—some confining it to the understanding, others to the will,
—till at last it pitched upon the whole soul, the intellective
nature. For the soul of man, should it be partitioned into
faculties,—as the grounds of our ordinary philosophy would
persuade us,—it would not be stately enough for so royal a
guest: either room would be too pent and narrow to enter-
tain at once so many graces as attend it. Faith therefore,
that it may be received in state, that it may have more free-
dom to exercise its sovereignty, hath required all partitions
to be taken down; that sitting in the whole soul it may com-
mand and order the whole man;; is not in the brain sometimes,
as its gallery, to recreate and contemplate; at another in the
heart, as its parlour to feed, or a closet to dispatch business ;
but if it be truly that royal personage which we take it for, it
is repletive in the whole house at once, as in one room, and
that a stately palace, which would be much disgraced, and
lose of its splendour, by being cut into offices: and accord-
ingly this royal grace is an entire absolute prince of a whole
nation,—not as a tetrarch of Galilee, a sharer of a Saxon hep-
tarchy,—and described to us as one single act, though of
great command; and defined to be an assent and adherence
to the goodness of the object ;—which object is the whole
word of God, and specially the promises of the gospel. So
then, to believe, is not to acknowledge the truth of Serip-
ture, and the articles of the Creed,—as vulgarly we use know-
ledge,—but to be affected with the goodness and excellency of
them, as the most precious objects which the whole world
could present to our choice; to embrace them as the only
desirable thing upon the earth; and to be resolutely and
uniformly inclined to express this affection of ours, in our
practice, whensoever there shall be any competition betwixt
them and our dearest delights. For the object of our faith
is not merely speculative, somewhat to be understood only,
SERMON XIX. 397
and assented to as true, but chiefly moral, a truth to be pro-
secuted with my desires through my whole conversation, to
be valued above my life, and set up in my heart as the only
shrines I worship.
So that he that is never so resolutely sworn to the Scrip-
tures,—believes all the commands, prohibitions, and promises
never so firmly, if he doth not adhere to them in his prac-
tice, and by particular application of them as a rule to guide
him in all his actions, express that he sets a true value on
them ; if he do not this, he is yet an infidel; all his religion
is but like the beads-man’s, who whines over his creed and
commandments over a threshold so many times a week, only
as his task to deserve his quarterage, or to keep correspond-
ence with his patron. Unless I see his belief expressed by
uniform obedience, I shall never imagine that he minded
what he said. The sincerity of his faith is always proportion-
able to the integrity of his life; and so far is he to be ac-
counted a Christian as he performs the obligation of it, the
promise of his baptism. Will any man say that Eve believed
God’s inhibition, when she eat the forbidden fruit? If she
did, she was of a strange intrepid resolution, to run into the
jaws of hell and never boggle. It is plain by the story that
she heard God, but believed the serpent; as may appear by
her obedience, the only evidence and measure of her faith.
Yet can it not be thought, that she that was so lately a work
of God’s omnipotence, should now so soon distrust it, and
believe that He could not make good His threatenings. The
truth is this; she saw clearly enough in her brain, but had not
sunk it down into her heart; or perhaps she assented to it in the
general, but not as appliable to her present case. This assent
was like a bird fluttering in the chamber, not yet confined to
a cage, ready to escape at the first opening of the door or
window ; as soon as she opens either ears or eyes to hearken
to the serpent or behold the apple, her former assent to God
is vanished, and all her faith bestowed upon the devil. It
will not be Pelagianism to proceed and observe how the
condition of every sin since this time hath been an imitation
of that. The same method in sin hath ever since been taken,
first to revolt from God, and then to disobey ; first to become
infidels, and then sinners. Every murmuring of the Israel-
Heb. iii.
12.
Heb. x. 38.
398 SERMON XIx.
ites was a defection from the faith of Israel, and turning back
to Egypt in their hearts.
Infidelity, as it is the fountain from whence all rebellion
springs,—faith being an adherence, and “every departure
from the living God, arising from an evil heart of unbelief,”—
so it is also the channel where it runs; not any beginning or
progress in sin, without a concomitant degree of either weak-
ness or want of faith. So that heathens or heretics are not
the main enemies of Christ,—as the question de oppositis fidei
is stated by the Romanists,—but the hypocrite and libertine,
he is the heathen in grain, an heretic of Lucifer’s own sect ;
one that the devil is better pleased with than all the cata-
logue in Epiphanius or the Romish calendar. For this is it
that Satan drives at; an engine by which he hath framed us
most like himself; not when we doubt of the doctrine of
Christ,—for himself believes it fully, no man can be more
firmly resolved of it,—but when we heed it not in our lives,
when we cleave not to it in our hearts; when instead of
living by faith, ὑποστέλλομεν, we draw back, and cowardly
subduce ourselves and forsake our colours, refusing to be
marshalled in His ranks, or fight under His banner. Arrian
the Stoic philosopher hath an excellent discourse concerning
the double infidelity, of the brain and heart, very appliable;
Aitrat ἀπολιθώσεις, k.T-X., “ There are two sorts of this sense-
lessness and stupidity, whereby men are hardened into stones ;
the first of the understanding part, the second of the practi-
cal.” He that will not assent to things manifest, his brain is
frozen into a stone or mineral; there is no more reasoning
with him than with a pillar. The academic’s ἀκαταληψρίαϑ,
never to believe or comprehend any thing, was a stupid
philosophy, like to have no disciples but posts or statues ;
and therefore long ago laughed out of the schools, as an art
of being brutes, or metamorphosis, not to instruct but trans-
form them: he could not remain a man that was thus incre-
dulous. But the second stupidity, that of the practical, not
to abstain from things that are hurtful, to embrace that which
would be their death,—the vice, though not doctrine of the
epicures,—though this were an argument, both in his and
Scripture phrase, of a “stony heart,’ yet was it such an
* [Cf. e. g. Sextus Empericus, Pyrrhon. Hypotyp., p. 1. ed. Bekker. }
SERMON XIX. 399
one as the lustiest, sprightfulest men in the world carried
about with them. Nay, “It was an evidence,” saith he, “ of
their strength and valour, of a heart of metal and proof, to
have all modesty and fear of ill cold as a stone, frozen and
dead within it.” And thus holds it in Christianity, as it did
then in reason: not to believe the truth of Scripture, to
deny that the “ Lord liveth,” would argue a brain as impene-
trable as marble, and eyes as crystal: we sooner suspect
that he is not a man, that he is out of his senses, than such
an infidel. Some affected atheists I have heard of, that hope
to be admired for eminent wits by it: but I doubt whe-
ther any ever thought of it in earnest, and (if I may so
say) conscientiously denied a Deity. But to deny Him in our
lives, to have a heart of marble or adamant, ψυχὴν ἀπονε-
κρουμένην, saith Arrian ¢, “a dead stupified soul,” οὐδὲν μέλει,
it is so frequent amongst us, that it is not worth observing.
He is but a puny in the devil’s camp that hath not a privy
coat within him to secure his heart from any stroke that
God or Scripture can threaten him with.
Thus you see wherein this Christian infidelity consists, in
the not rooting faith in the heart; in indulgence to those
practices which directly contradict his doctrine. So that
though every commission of sin be not incompatible with
the habit of faith, so far as to denominate him an infidel ;
yet is it from the not exercising of faith actually that I ever
sin; and every man in the same degree that he is a sinner,
so far is he an unbeliever. So that this conversible retro-
gradous Sorites may shut up all. He that truly believes,
assents in his heart to the goodness as well as the truth of
Scripture: he that assents so in his heart, approves it ac-
cording to its real excellency above all rivals in the world:
he that thus approves, when occasion comes, makes an actual
choice of God’s Word before all other most precious delights :
he that actually makes the choice, performs uniform obedi-
ence, without any respect of sins or persons: he that per-
forms this obedience, never indulges himself in sin. And
then e converso, backward, thus: he that indulges himself in
> “Ay δὲ τίνος τὸ ἐντρεπτικὸν καὶ ai- sertat., lib. 1, ο. 5. § 8, ad init.]
δῆμον ἀπονεκρωθῇ, τοῦτο ἔτι καὶ δύνα- ὁ [Arrian, ibid., § 4. ]
μιν καλοῦμεν .---ἰ Arrian, Epicteti Dis-
1 Johniii.6.
4.00 SERMON XIX.
sin, doth not uniformly obey the Word: he that doth not so
obey, doth not actually make choice of it before all com-
petitors: he that makes not this choice, approves it not ac-
cording to its real excellency above all things in the world:
he that doth not so approve, assents not to the absolute
goodness of it in his heart: he that so assents not, doth not
truly believe; therefore every indulgent sinner is an infidel.
And then look about you and within you: whosoever say,
“The Lord liveth,” and yet remain in your ways of sin, be
you never so stout or proud-hearted, my prophet gives you
the lie: if you are incensed, and swear that you are in the
truth, and stand upon your reputation, his answer is man-
nerly, but tart, “Surely you swear falsely ;” every indulgent
sinner is an infidel.“ Whosoever sins, hath not seen Christ,
neither known Him.” But amongst professors of the gospel
there be a multitude of habitual sinners, ergo of infidels ; ὅπερ
ἔδει πρῶτον δεῖξαι, the thing which in the first place we un-
dertook to demonstrate.
We now come to the next thing proposed, the root or foun-
tain of this hypocritical faith; where we are to enquire how
it comes about, that they which are so forward to profess, are
so far from true belief. And higher in our search we cannot
go than Adam’s fall; for the spring-head of all this infidelity—
as for God’s absolute decree, in rejecting men’s persons, and
then suffering and leading them to an acknowledgment of the
truth of the gospel, only that they may be unexcusable, I will
not be so vain or unseasonable to examine. Adam had once
the tree of life to have eaten, and have been immortal; to
have confirmed him and his posterity into an irreversible
estate of happiness: but since his disobedient heart preferred
the tree of knowledge before that of life, the tree of life hath
never thrived currently with his progeny. All our care, and
traffic, and merchandise, hath been for knowledge, never
prizing or cheapening so poor a commodity as life. Ξύλον
γνώσεως ἐστὶν ἐὰν παρανομῶμεν", x.T.r., “ All sin is from the
tree of knowledge;” and that hath rooted it so deep, and
given it so fair a growth within us.
As for the tree of life, seeing then we would not feed on
it, we were never since suffered to come within reach: the
4 [Clemens Alexandr. Strom., lib. iii. c. 17. § 104. p. 559. ed. Potter.]
SERMON XIX. 4.01
cherubins and a flaming sword have fenced it round about ; Gen. iii.
and that makes men grow so unproportionably into such °*
monstrous shapes, vast, strong, swollen heads; and weak,
thin, crazy bodies, like Pharaoh’s lean kine, lank, and very
ill-favoured : men for the most part having brains to under-
stand, and eyes to see, and tongues to profess; but neither
hearts to apply, nor hands to practise, nor feet to walk the
ways of God’s commandments: as one far spent in a con-
sumption, who hath his senses perfectly enough, when he is
not able to go. It is only the effectual grace of God—of
which that other tree was but an emblem—which must give
us life and strength to practise what we know. And this
amongst us is so little cared for, finds such disesteem and
slight observance when it appears, meets with such resolute,
hardened, stubborn hearts, that it is a miracle if it ever be
brought to submit itself to such coarse entertainment.
And this is the first and main ground of this hypocritical
faith, our corrupt, immoderate desires of knowledge, and
neglect of grace. The second ground more evidently dis-
cernible in us, is, the secret consent and agreement betwixt
our carnal desires and divine knowledge; and the antipathy
and incompatibleness of the same with true faith.
The first pair dwell many times very friendly and peace-
ably together, do not quarrel in an age, or pass an affront or
cross word. Knowledge doth seldom justle or offer violences
to the desires of the flesh; a man may be very knowing and
very lewd; of a towering brain and a grovelling soul; rich
in speculation, and poor in practice.
But for the other pair, they are like opposite signs in the
heaven, have but a vicissitude of presence or light in our
hemisphere, never appear or shine together. Faith lusteth
and struggleth against the flesh, and the flesh against faith.
The carnal part is as afraid of faith, as the devil was of
Christ: for faith being seated in the concurrence of the
dictate of judgment, and—on the other side—the sway of
the affections, the one must either couch or be banished at
the other’s entrance ; and then it cries out in the voice of the
devil, “ What have I to do with Thee?” or, as the words Mark i. 24.
will bear, τί ἐμοὶ καὶ col; ‘“ What communion can there be
betwixt me and Thee?” Thou precious grace of God, “ Art
HAMMOND. dd
Matt. ii. 3.
4.02 SERMON XTX.
Thou come to torment and dispossess me before my time ?”
O what a stir there is in the flesh, when faith comes to take
its throne in the heart; as at the news of Christ’s incar-
nation corporal, so at His spiritual, “ Herod the king is
troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.” All the reigning
Herod sins, and all the Jerusalem of habitual ruling lusts
and affections, are in great disorder, as knowing that this
new King abodes their instant destruction.
It was Aristotle’s* observation, that the mathematics being
an abstract knowledge, had nothing in them contrary to
passions ; and therefore young men and dissolute might
study and prove great proficients in them, if they had but a
good apprehension; there was no more required: and that
perhaps is the reason that such studies as these, history and
geometry, and the like, go down pleasantliest with those which
have no design upon books, but only to rid them of some
hours, which would otherwise lie on their hands. The most
studious of our gentry ordinarily deal in them, as imoffen-
sive, tame, peaceable studies, which will never check them
for any the most inordinate affections. But of morality,
saith he, and practical knowledge, a young man or intem-
perate is uncapable: you may make him con the precepts
without book, or say them by rote, ἀλλ᾽ ov πιστεύει“, “ He
cannot be said to believe a word of them;” his heart is so
possessed with green, fresh, boisterous lusts, that he cannot
admit any sober precepts any further than his memory. If
you are in earnest with him to apply and practise what he
reads, you exact of him beyond his years; he is not solemn
enough for so sad severe employment; and therefore it is
concluded that he is fit for any intellectual virtue, rather
than prudence. This consists in a peaceable temper of the
mind; an artist he may prove and never live the better ;
suppose him one of youthful luxuriant desires, and never
think he will be taught to live by rule, all the learning and
study in books will never give him Aristotle’s moral pru-
dence, much less our spiritual, which is by interpretation,
faith. ,
And this is the second ground of infidelity amongst
Christians, the competibility of knowledge, and incompeti-
* Eth. vi. 9. f [Aristot., ibid. ]
SERMON XIX. 4.03
bility of true faith, with carnal desires. The third is, the
easiness of giving assent to generalities, and difficulty of par-
ticular application.
A common truth delivered in general terms is received
without any opposition: should it be proposed, whether no-
thing be to be done but that which is just? whether drunk-
enness were not a vice? whether only an outside of religion
would ever save a man? no man would ever quarrel about
it. When thus Nathan and David discoursed, they were [2 Sam.
both of one mind; the one could talk no more against un- aoe
conscionable dealing than the other would assent to. If
you propose no other problems than these, the debauchedest
man under heaven would not dispute against you. But all
quarrelling, saith the Stoic’, is περὶ τὴν ἐφαρμογὴν τῶν
προλήψεων ταῖς ἐπὶ μέρους οὐσίαις, “about the application
of general granted rules, to personal, private cases. ”
The Jews, and Assyrians, and Egyptians, and Romans, are
all agreed, that holiness is to be preferred above all things;
but whether it be not impious to eat swine’s flesh and the
like, which of them observes the rules of holiness most ex-
actly, there the strife begins.
Common general declamations against sin are seldom ever
offensive ; and therefore the master of rhetorics® finds fault
with them as dull, liveless, unprofitable eloquence, that no
man is affected with. The cowardliest bird in the air is not
afraid of the falcon, as long as she sees him soaring and
never stoop: but when the axe that was carried about the
wood, threatening all indifferently, shall be laid to the root
of the tree, when Nathan shall rejoinder with a “thou art [2 Sam.
the man,” and St. Paul come home to his Corinthians after et)
his declamation against fornicators and idolaters with ‘ and 1 Cor. vi.
such were some of you,” then their hearts come to the touch-
stone; this is a trial of their belief: if they will forsake
their sins, which before their judgment condemned at a dis-
tance ; if they will practise the holiness and integrity which
they were content to hear commended.
That famous war of the Trojans and Iliads of misery,
following it in Homer, were all from this ground. The two
—_
_
8 Πρόληψις προλήψει ov μόάχεται.--- » [Perhaps refers to Aristot. Rhet.,
Arr. Epict. Dissertat., lib. i. c. 22. ὃ 1. lib. ii. ς. 22.]
pd2
Acts xxiv.
25.
Jam. ii. 29,
Acts xxvi.
28.
4.04 SWRMON X1X.
great captains at the treaty agree very friendly that just
dealing was very strictly to be observed by all men; and yet
neither would one of them restore the pawn committed to
his trust, nor the other divide the spoils: each as resolute
not to practise, as both before unanimous to approve.
There is not a thing more difficult in the world, than to per-
suade a carnal man that that which concerns all men should
have any thing to do with him ; that those promises of Christ
which are confessed to be the most precious under heaven,
should be fitter for his turn than this amiable, lovely sin,
that now solicits him. That Scripture is inspired by God;
and therefore in all its dictates to be believed and obeyed, is
a thing fully consented on amongst Christians. We are so
resolved on it, that it is counted but a dull barren question
in the schools, a mam can invent nothing to say against by
way of argument ; andif a preacher in a sermon should make
it his business to prove it to you, you would think he either
suspected you for Turks, or had little else to say. But when
a particular truth of Scripture comes in balance with a pleas-
ing sin, when the general prohibition strikes at my private
lust, all my former assent to Scripture is vanished, I am hur-
ried into the embraces of my beloved delight. Thus when
Paul “ reasoned of temperance, righteousness, and judgment
to come, Felix trembled.” His trembling shews that he
assented to Paul’s discourse ; and as in the devils, it was an
effect of a general belief; but this subject of temperance and
judgment to come agreed not with Felix’s course of life.
His wife Drusilla was held by usurpation; he had tolled her
away from her husband, the king of the Emiseni, saith
Josephus*, and therefore he could hear no more of it: he
shifts and compliments it off till another time, and never
means to come in such danger again to be converted, for fear
of a divorce from his two treasures, his heathenism and his
whore.
Thus was Agrippa converted from the shoulders upward,
which he calls “almost a Christian;” or as the phrase may be
rendered, ἐν ὀλέγῳ, “a little way,” convinced as to the general
truths in his brain; but the lower half, his heart and affec-
tions, remained as heathenish as ever.
k Antig. Jud., lib. xx. ο. 7.
SERMON XIX. 4.05
And this is the third ground of practical unbelief, that
generalities can be cheaply believed without parting from any
thing we prize; the doctrine of the Trinity can be received,
and thwart never a carnal affection as being an inoffen-
sive truth. Christ’s sufferings and satisfaction for sin by the
natural man may be heard with joy; but particular applica-
tion is very difficult: that our obedience to every command
of that Trinity must be sincere: that we must forego all, and
hate our own flesh to adhere to so merciful a Saviour, and
express our love to the most contemptible soul under heaven,
as He hath loved us; that we must at last expect Him in
majesty as a judge, whom we are content to hug and embrace
in His humility as a Saviour: this is a bloody word, as Moses’
wife counted the circumcision too harsh and rough to be re- 3
ceived into such pampered, tender, fleshy hearts.
The fourth ground is a general humour that is gotten in
the world, to take care of nothing but our reputations: nor
God, nor life, nor soul, nor any thing can weigh with it in
the balance. Now it is a scandalous thing, a foul blot to
one’s name, to be counted an atheist, an arrant infidel, where
all are Christians; and therefore for fashion’s sake we will
believe ; and yet sometime the devil hath turned this humour
quite the contrary way, and made some men as ambitious of
being counted atheists, as others of being Christians. It
will shortly grow into a gentile garb, and part of courtship,
to disclaim all religion in shew, as well as deeds. Thus are a
world of men in the world, either professed atheists, or atheisti-
cal professors, upon the same grounds of vainglory ; the one
to get, the other to save their reputation in the world. Thus
do many men stand up at the Creed, upon the same terms as
gallants go into the field; that have but small maw to be
killed, only to keep their honour, that they might not be
branded and mocked for cowards. And yet certainly in the
truth, these are the veriest dastards under heaven ; no worldly
man so fearful of death, or pious man of hell, as these are of
disgrace.
The last ground I shall mention, and indeed the main of
all, is, the subtlety and wiliness of the devil. He hath tried
all his stratagems in the world, and hath found none like
this for the undermining and ruining of souls, to suffer them
[ Exod. iv.
6. ]
Matt. xix.
2},
406 SERMON XIX.
to advance a pretty way in religion, to get their heads full of
knowledge, that so they may think they have faith enough,
and walk to hell securely. The devil’s first policies were by
heresies to corrupt the brain, to invade and surprise Chris-
tianity by force: but he soon saw this would not hold out
long ; he was fain to come from batteries to mines, and sup-
plant those forts that he could not vanquish. The fathers—
and amongst them chiefly Leo!, in all his writing—within
the first five hundred years after Christ, observe him at this
ward, ut guos vincere ferro flammisque non poterat, cupiditati-
bus irretiret, et sub falsa Christiani nominis professione cor-
rumperet. We hoped to get more by lusts than heresies, and
to plunge men deepest in a high conceit of their holy faith.
He had learned by experience from himself, that all the bare
knowledge in the world would never sanctify; it would per-
haps give men content, and make them confident and bold
of their estate ; and by presuming on such grounds, and pre-
scribing merit to heaven by their “ Lord, Lord,” even “seal
them up to the day of damnation ;” and therefore it is ordi-
nary with Satan to give men the tether a great way, lest they
should grumble at his tyranny, and prove apostates from
him upon hard usage. Knowledge is pleasant, and books
are very good company; and therefore if the devil should
bind men to ignorance, our speculators and brain epicures
would never be his disciples; they would go away sadly, as
the young man from Christ, who was well affected with His
service, but could not part with his riches. So then you shall
have his leave to know and believe in God, as much as you
please, so you will not obey Him; and be as great scholars as
Satan himself, so you will be as profane. The heart of man
is the devil’s palace, where he keeps his state; and as long
as he can strengthen himself there by a guard and band of
lusts, he can be content to afford the outworks to God,
divine speculation, and never be disturbed or affrighted by
any enemy at such a distance.
Thus have you the grounds also whereupon true faith—
which is best defined a spiritual prudence, an application of
spiritual knowledge to holy practice—should be so often
''S. Leo. Mag. [cf. e.g. tom. 1, pp. 94, 1383, 134, 179. The express passage
has net been found. }
SERMON XIX. 407
wanting in men which are very knowing, and the fairest
professors of Christianity.
Now lest this discourse also should reach no further than
your ears, lest that which hath been said should be only as-
sented to in the general as true, not applied home to your
particular practices, and so do you no more good than these
general professions did here to the Jews, only to prove you
perjured hypocrites, “swearing falsely, whilst you say the
Lord liveth,” we will endeavour to leave some impression
upon your hearts by closing all with application.
And that shall be in brief meekly to desire you; and if
that will not serve the turn, by all the mercies of heaven, and
horrors of hell, to adjure you to examine yourselves on these
two interrogatories, which my text will suggest to you, first,
whether you are as good as the Jews here? secondly, whether
you are not, the best of you, altogether as bad?
For the first, the Jews here said the ‘“ Lord liveth,” were
very forward to profess; and it were some, though but a low
measure of commendation, for us to be no worse than Jews.
Let there go a severe inquisition out from the royal majesty
over the whole court, or at least from every particular man
upon himself; and bring in an impartial verdict, whether
there be not some amongst you, that are not come thus far
as to say, “the Lord liveth.” Some are so engaged in a
trade of misshapen, horrid, monstrous vices, have so framed
and fashioned the whole fabric of their lives, without any
blush or lineament of God in them, that they are afraid ever
to mention Him in earnest, for fear of putting them out of
their course ; they dare not believe too much of God, lest it
should be their undoing; a little sense of Him would take off
many of their tricks of sinning, and consequently spoil their
thriving in the world; like Diana’s silversmith, “for by this Acts xix.
craft they have their wealth.” The least glimpse of God in **
these men’s hearts, nay, one solemn mention of Him in
their mouths, were enough to bring them into some com-
pass, to upbraid their ways, and reprove their thoughts.
Were these men taken to task according to the canon laws
of our kingdom, and not suffered to live any longer amongst
Christians, till they understood clearly the promise of their
baptism, till they durst come and make the same vow in
[ Ps. xix.
5.]
Eph. ii,
ΠΤ:
408 SERMON XIX.
their own persons, before all the congregation, which in their
infancy their sureties made for them; were our canon of
confirmation duly put in execution, and every one, as soon
as he were capable, either persuaded or forced to fit himself
for the receiving of it,—as it is severely required by our ru-
bric, though much neglected in the practice ;—I doubt not but
there would be fewer sins amongst us, much more knowledge
of God, and mentioning of His name, without the help of
oaths and blasphemies, to which God now is in a kind be-
holding that ever He comes into our mouths. But now men
having a great way to go in sin, and nothing in the world to
stop them, begin their journey as soon as they are able to
go, and make such haste—hke the sun, or giant in the
Psalmist—to run their course, are so intent upon the task
the devil hath set them, that they can never stay to see or
hear of God in their lives, which yet is legible and palpable
in every syllable of the world. If they are so well brought
up as to have learned their Creed and Catechism, they have
no other use for it but to break jests, and swear by; and
would soon forget God’s very name or attributes, did they
not daily repeat them over—as schoolboys their parts,—and
often comment on them by oaths and profanations; and
these are ἄθεοι in the Apostle’s phrase, “ without God in the
world.”
Others there are of a prouder, loftier strain, ἀντίθεοι,
and θεομάχοι, that pitch camp, and arm and fortify them-
selves against God, that would fain be a forging some
other religion, they are so weary and cloyed with this.
Thus have I heard of some that have sought earnestly for
an Alcoran, and profess an opinion that all true divinity lies
there, and expect to be esteemed great wits, of a deep reach,
for this supposal. Others that have not skill enough to un-
derstand Turkism, yet have lusts enough to admire it, and
the brave carnal paradise it promises; and if they cannot
persuade themselves to believe in it, yet they fancy it nota-
bly; and because they cannot expect to have it in another
life, they will be sure of it in this.
Hence do they advance to such a pitch of sensuality, as
heathenism was never guilty of; their whole life is a per-
petual study of the arts of death, and their whole souls an
SERMON XIX. 409
holocaust or burnt sacrifice to their fleshly lusts. It were
an horrid representation but to give you in a diagram the
several arts that the god of this world hath now taught men
to vilify and reproach the God of heaven. Professed athe-
ism begins to set up; it comes in fashion, and then some
courtiers must needs be in it. Profaning of Scripture, and
making too cheap of it, was never so ordinary; that holy
volume was never so violently and coarsely handled, even
ravished and deflowered by unhallowed lips. It is grown
the only stuff in request, and ordinariest garment to clothe
a piece of scurrilous wit in, and the best of us can scarce
choose but give it some applause. Beloved, there is not a
sin in the world that sticks closer to him that once enter-
tained it; the least indulgence in it is a desperate sign. It
is called the “chair of scorners,” a sin of ease and pleasure: [Ps.i.1.]
a man that uses it, that is once a merry atheist, seldom, if
ever, proves a sad sober Christian. Julian, and many others,
have gone scoffing to hell,—hke men whom custom of mock-
ing hath made wry-mouthed,—scarcely composing themselves
to a solemn countenance, till horror either of hell or con-
science hath put smiling out of date. And if any of these
sins are but crept in amongst you, it will be worthy our en-
quiry and examination ;—and God grant your own impartial
consciences may return you not guilty :—however this will
but prove you no worse than Jews, for they here acknow-
ledge God in their brain and tongues; they said, “The Lord
liveth.”
Your second interrogatory must be, whether whilst you
thus profess, you do not also swear falsely? And then it is
to be feared that every action of your lives will bring in an
evidence against you. It were an accusation perhaps that
you seldom hear of, to be challenged for hypocrites, to be
turned puritans and pretenders to holiness: yet this is it
my text must charge you with; professing of religion, and
never practising it; assenting to the truth of Scripture in
your brain, but not adhering to it in your hearts; believing
in Christ, and yet valuing Him beneath the meanest sin you
meet with. Look over your Creed, and observe whether
your lives do not contradict every word in it; and is it not
hypocrisy and perjury, or, if you will have it, high compli-
41.0 SERMON XIX.
menting with God, to be thus profuse and prodigal in our
professions, which we never mean to perform? Then is it to
be called belief, when it is sunk down into our hearts, when
it hath taken root in a well-tempered soil, and begins to
spring above ground, and hasten into an ear. That which
grows like moss on the tiles of an house, which is set no
deeper than the fancy, will never prove either permanent or
solid nourishment to the soul. It were a new hour’s work
to shew every defect in our faith by our defections and deser-
tions of God in our manners; yet if you will be in earnest
with yourselves, and apply the grounds premised to your seri-
ous examination, your meditations may throughly make up
what here is likely to be omitted.
One thing take home with you for a rule to eternity, that
every indulgence in any sin is a sure argument of an infidel: be
you never so proud and confident of your faith, and justifica-
tion by it; be you never so resolute that the “ Lord liveth ;”
yet if your obedience be not uniform, if you embrace not
what you assent to, “surely you swear falsely.”? Your par-
ticular failings I am not knowing enough to represent to you;
your own consciences, if they be but called to, cannot choose
but reflect them to your sight. Your outward profession and
frequency in it, for the general is acknowledged; your cus-
tom of the place requires it of you; and the example of piety
that rules in your eyes cannot but extort it. Only let your
lives witness the sincerity of your professions; let not a dead
carcass walk under a living head, and a nimble active Chris-
tian brain be supported with bed-rid, motionless heathen
limbs. Let me see you move and walk, as well as breathe,
that I may hope to see you saints as well as Christians.
And this shall be the sum, not only of my advice to you,
but for you, of my prayers: that the Spirit would sanctify
all our hearts as well as brains; that He will subdue, not
only the pride and natural atheism of our understandings,
but the rebellions, and infidelity, and heathenism of our
lusts; that being purged from any relics, or tincture, or
suspicion of irreligion in either power of our souls, we may
live by faith, and move by love, and die in hope; and both
in life and death glorify God here, and be glorified with
Him hereafter.
SERMON XX.
Luke xvii. 11.
God, I thank Thee, that I am not as other men, extortioners, §c.,
or even as this publican.
THAT we may set out at our best advantage, and yet not go
too far back to take our rise, it is but retiring to the end of the
eighth verse of this chapter, and there we shall meet with
an abrupt speech, hanging like one of Solomon’s proverbs,
without any seeming dependence on any thing before or
after it: which yet upon enquiry will appear διοπετὴς, fallen
down from heaven, in the posture it stands in. In the be-
ginning of the eighth verse he concludes the former parable,
“1 tell you that He will avenge them speedily ;” and then [Acts xix.
abruptly, ‘‘ Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, shall 38]
He find faith upon the earth?” And then immediately, verse
9, “ He spake another parable to certain that trusted in them-
selves,” where this speech in the midst, “when the Son of
Man comes,” &c., stands there by itself, like the Pharisee in
my text, seorsim, apart, as an ἐμβόλιμον or intercalary day
between two months, which neither of them will own, or
more, truly like one of Democritus’ atoms, the casual concur-
rence of which he accounted the principle and cause of all
things.
That we may not think so vulgarly of Scripture as to
dream that any tittle of it came by resultance or casually
into the world, that any speech dropped from His mouth
unobserved, “that spake as man never spake,” both in
respect of the matter of His speeches, and the weight and
secret energy of all accidents attending them, it will appear
on consideration, that this speech of His, which seems an
ver. 9.
ver. 10.
412 SERMON XX.
ὑπερβάλλον or ὑπερβαῖνον, asupernumerary superfluous one,
is indeed the head of the corner, and ground of the whole
parable, or at least a fair hint or occasion of delivering it at
that time. Not to trouble you with its influence on the
parable going before concerning perseverance in prayer,—
to which it is as an isthmus or fibula, to join it to what
follows,—but to bring our eyes home to my present subject ;
after the consideration of the prodigious defect of faith in
this decrepit last age of the world, in persons who made the
ereatest pretences to it, and had arrived unto assurance and
security in themselves ; He presently arraigns the Pharisee,
the highest instance of this confidence, and brings his righte-
ousness to the bar, sub hac forma.
There is like to be toward the second coming of Christ,
His particular visitation of the Jews, and (then its parallel)
Tis final coming to judgment, such a specious pompous show,
and yet such a small pittance of true faith i the world, that
as it is grown much less than a grain of mustard-seed, it shall
not be found when it is sought; there will be such giantly
shadows and pigmy substances, so much and yet so little
faith, that no hieroglyphic can sufficiently express it, but
an Egyptian temple gorgeously overlaid, inhabited within by
crocodiles, and cats, and carcasses, instead of gods; or an
apple of Sodom, that shews well till it be handled; a
painted sepulchre, or a specious nothing; or which is the
contraction and tachygraphy of all these, a Pharisee at his
prayers. And thereupon Christ spake the parable, “There
were two men went up into the temple to pray, the one a
Pharisee,” &c.
Concerning the true nature of faith, mistaken extremely
now-a-days by those which pretend most to it, expulsed
almost out of men’s brains as well as hearts, so that now it
is scarce to be found upon earth, either in our lives or almost
in our books, there might be framed a seasonable complaint
in this place, were I not already otherwise embarked. By
some prepossessions and prejudices infused into us as soon as
we can con a catechism of that making, it comes to pass that
many men live and die resolved that faith is nothing but the
assurance of the merits of Christ applied to every man parti-
cularly; and consequently of his salvation: that I must first
SERMON XX. 413
be sure of heaven, or else I am not capable of it; confident
of my salvation, or else necessarily damned. Cornelius Agrippa
being initiated in natural magic, Paracelsus in mineral ex-
tractions, Plato full of his ideas, will let nothing be done
without the Pythagoreans, brought up with numbers per-
petually in their ears, and the physicians poring daily upon
the temperaments of the body; the one will define the soul
an harmony, the other a xpdovs, saith Philoponus. And so
are many amongst us, that take up fancies upon trust for
truths, never laying any contrary proposals to heart, come at
last to account this assurance as a principle without which
they can do nothing; the very soul that must animate all
their obedience, which is otherwise but a carcass or heathen
virtue; in a word, the only thing by which we are justified
or saved. The confutation of this popular error I leave to
some grave learned tongue, that may enforce it on you with
some authority; for I conceive not any greater hindrance of
Christian obedience and godly practice among us, than this:
for as long as we are content with this assurance as sufficient
stock to set up for heaven, there is like to be but little faith
upon the earth. Faith, if it be truly so, is hke Christ Him-
self, when He was Emmanuel, God upon the earth, ἐνσαρκω-
θεῖσα, an incarnate faith, cut out and squared into limbs and
lineaments ; not only a spiritual invisible faith, but even flesh
and blood, to be seen and felt, organized for action; it is to
speak, and breathe, and walk, and run the ways of God’s
commandments: an assent not only to the promises of the
gospel, but uniformly to the whole word of God, commands
and threats as well as promises. And this, not in the brain
or surface of the soul, as the Romanist seats it, but in the
heart, as regent of the hand and tongue in the concurrence
of all the affections. Where it is not only a working faith,
an obeying faith, but even a work, even obedience itself; not
only a victorious faith, but even victory itself; “This is our Rom. i. 5;
victory, even our faith :” to part with this as a πάρεργον, which 1 798}. +
is our only business, is sure an unreasonable thesis. Any
faith but this is a faith in the clouds, or in the air, the upper
region of the soul, the brain; or at most but a piece of the
heart ; a magical faith, a piece of sorcery and conjuring ; that
will teach men to remove mountains, only by thinking they
ver. 12.
4.14. SERMON XX.
are able; but will never be taken by Christ for this faith
upon the earth: if it do walk here, it is but as a ghost, it is
even pity but it were laid. Let me beseech you meekly, but
if this would not prevail, I would conjure you all in this
behalf; the silly weak Christian to fly from this μορμολύ-
κειον, and call for some light of their lawful pastors, to find
out the deceit; and the more knowing illuminate Christian
to examine sincerely and impartially by feeling and handling
it throughly, whether there be any true substance in it or no.
The Pharisee, looking upon himself superficially, thought he
had gone on, on very good grounds, very unquestionable
terms, that he was possessed of a very fair estate ; he brought
in an inventory of a many precious works; “I fast, I tithe,”
&e.; hath no other liturgies but thanksgivings, no other
sacrifice to bring into the temple, but eucharistical; and yet
how foully the man was mistaken!
“God, I thank,” &c.
The first thing I shall observe in the words is the τὸ Noy-
κὸν, the rational importance of them, as they are part of a
rhetorical syllogism, an example or parallel to shew that in
the last days, though men think that there is a great deal,
yet there is indeed like to be but little faith upon the earth.
And the issue from thence is the Pharisee’s flattering favour-
able misconceit of his own estate, and the parallel line to that,
our premature deceivable persuasions of ourselves, that is
ordinary among Christians.
The second thing is the τὸ ῥητὸν, the natural literal im-
portance of the words, and therein the concomitants or effects
of those his misconceits.
1. Pride, 2. Censoriousness. Pride noted by his speech,
“1 thank Thee that I am not;” then his posture, pluming up
himself, “standing by himself he prayed ;” as the Syriac set
the words, and many Greek copies, some by making a comma
after πρὸς ἑαυτὸν, others by reading σταθεὶς καθ᾽ ἑαντὸν,
“standing by himself ;” as Beza renders it, seorsim, “ apart ;”
not as our English, he “stood and prayed thus with himself,”
but as the words will likewise bear it, “he stood by himself”
thus; this posture signifying a proud contemptuous beha-
viour, whilst the publican stood crouching humbly and
tremblingly behind.
SERMON XX. 47
2. Censoriousness and insinuating accusations of other
men’s persons, “even as this publican.” ΤῸ which we may
add the occasion of all this, seeing the publican behind him,
i. e. comparing himself with notorious sinners, he was thus
proud and censorious.
And of these in their order, as powerfully and effectually
to your hearts, as God shall enable me. And first of the
first, the Pharisee’s favourable misconceits of himself, and
parallel to these, our deceivable persuasions of ourselves,
<“God,.1 thank,’ .&c.
The black sin that hath dyed the Pharisee’s soul so deep,
as to become his characteristic inseparable property, a kind
of agnomen, a perpetual accession to his name, is hypocrisy.
The proper natural importance of which word signifies the
personating or acting of a part, putting on another habit
than doth properly belong to him. But by the liberty we
ordinarily allow to words, to enlarge themselves sometimes
beyond their own territories, to thrive and gain somewhat
from their neighbours, it is come vulgarly to signify all that
ambitious outside, or formality, the colour and varnish of
religion, by which any man deceives either others or him-
self; and accordingly there is a twofold hypocrisy, the first,
deceiving others; the second, himself. That by which he im-
poseth upon others is the sin we commonly declaim against,
under that name, most fiercely, sometime by just reason, as
having been circumvented by such glozes, sometime in a
natural zeal to truth, preferring plain downright impiety,
before the same transfigured by a varnish. Reatus impii
pium nomen, his being counted innocent is an accession to
his guilt. But then sometimes too, under this odious name
we may wound sincere and pure devotion; as the primitive
Christians were by the tyrants put in wild beasts’ skins that
they may be torn in pieces; men may be deterred from all
the least appearance of purity, for fear they should be counted
hypocrites. However this first sort of hypocrisy may deserve
its seasonable reprehension, this parable in my text doth not
take it in; but insists mainly upon the other, that colour of
piety by which a man deceives himself, and cheats and glozes
with hisown soul. That first sort, were it not for some hurtful
consequences, might for aught I can gainsay pass for an in-
416 SERMON XX.
nocent quality ina sinner. For what great injury doth that
man do to any other, or himself? what grand sin against God
or the world, by desiring to seem better than he is; by labour-
ing to conceal those sins in himself, which could not be known
without dishonour to God, and scandal to his neighbour? It
was a lawyer’s answer, being questioned whether it were law-
ful for a woman to take money for prostituting herself, that
indeed it was a sin to prostitute herself; but that being sup-
posed, as in some kingdoms it 15 permitted, he thought it was
no great fault to get her living by it.
Not to justify his opinion, but apply it by accommodation :
in like manner arraign an hypocrite, and muster up all the
sins he hath committed in secret, and all these I will acknow-
ledge worthy of condemnation, because sins: nay, if his end
of concealing them be tocircumvent a well-believing neighbour,
that shall be set upon his score also; but for the desire itself
of keeping his sin from the eyes of men, so that he do not
from the eyes of God, and His ministers upon occasion, for a
cautiousness in any one not to sin scandalously, or on the
house-top, take this by itself, abstracted from the sin it
belongs to, and I cannot see why that should be either a
part or aggravation of asin. There is nothing that deserves
the tears, yea and holy indignation of a godly soul, more than
the sight of an immodest boasting sinner, that makes his
crimes his reputation, and his abominations his pride and
glory. It is that which we lay to the devil’s charge in the
times of heathenism ; that he strove to bring sin in credit by
building temples, and requiring sacrifices to lust, under the
name of Venus, Priapus, and the like; that incontinence
might seem an act of religion, and all the profaneness in the
world a piece of adoration. And it begins now to be revived
in the world again, when bashfulness is the quality of all
others most creditably parted with; and the only motive to
the commission of some sins is, to be in the fashion, to be seen
of men; when men put on affected errors, affected vanities,
affected oaths, just as they do gay clothes, that they may be the
better counted of: this indeed is a damnable hypocrisy, when
men are fain to act parts in sin, that they are not naturally
inclined to; and to force their constitutions, and even to offer
violence to their own tender dispositions, that so they may
SERMON XX. 417
not be scoffed at for punies, or precise persons, as Augustus’s
daughter, which being admonished of a sin that beasts would
never have committed, answered that that was the reason they
omitted the enjoyment of so precious a delight, because they
were beasts; as if innocence were more bestial than lust, and
ignorance of some sins the only guilt. The horror and detes-
tation that this sin strikes into me, makes me, I confess, will-
ing almost to become an advocate of the first kind of hypo-
crisy, whereby men retain so much modesty in their sins (I
hope of weakness) as to be willing to enjoy the charitable
men’s good opinion though undeserved.
But for the second kind of hypocrisy, this cozening of a
man’s own soul, this tiring and personating in the closet,
this inventing of arts and stratagems to send himself com-
fortably and believingly to the devil, this civil intestine
treachery within, and against one’s-self; this is the grand
imposture that here the Pharisee is noted for. An easiness
and cheatableness that costs the bankrupting of many a jolly
Christian soul. He, saith Plutarch”, that wants health, let
him go to the physicians, but he that wants εὐεξία, a good
durable habit of body, let him go to the γυμναστὰς, “the
masters of exercise,” otherwise he shall never be able to con-
firm himself into a solid firm constant health, called there-
upon by Hippocrates® ἕξις ἀθλητικὴ, “the constitution of
wrestlers ;” without which health itself is but a degree of
sickness, nourishment proves but swellings, and not growth,
but a tympany. Both these, saith he, philosophy will pro-
duce in the soul, not only teaching men θεοὺς σέβεσθαι, ---
where by the way he repeats almost the whole Decalogue of
Moses, though in an heathen dialect,—to “ worship the gods,”
&e., which is ὑγίεια ψυχῆς, “ the health of the soul,” but τόδε
μέγιστον, that “which is above all,” μὴ περιχαρεῖς ὑπάρχειν
μήτε ἐκλύτους, “not to be overjoyed or immoderately affected
in all this.” This which he attributes to philosophy in gene-
ral, is, saith Aristotle‘, an act of intellectual prudence, or
sobriety, μειζόνων ἢ ἄξιος ἑαυτὸν μὴ ἀξιοῦν, “not to vouch-
safe higher titles to himself than he is worthy of;” not to
® [De Liberis Educ., $10. tom. i. pt. xxiii. Med. Graci. ed. Kuhn. ]
1, p, 24. ed. Wyttenb. } a (Nic. Eth. iv. 7.]
© { Aphorismi, tom. iii. p. 706; tom.
HAMMOND. ge
Rom. xii.
[ Dan. iii.
25. ]
Song of
Three
Children,
ver. 10.
418 SERMON XX.
think himself in better health than he is, which is not the
dialect of a mere heathen, but the very language of Canaan,
φρονεῖν εἰς TO σωφρονεῖν, the very word in Aristotle, which
cannot be better expressed than by that περίφρασις, to have
a moderate, sober, equal opinion of one’s own gifts; not to
overprize God’s graces in ourselves, not to accept one’s own
person or give flattering titles to one’s-self, in Job’s phrase.
This Chrysostom ® calls ταπεινοφροσύνη, a word near kin unto
the former, the meekness or lowliness of heart, ὅτων τις, K.T.X.,
‘‘when a man having attained to a great measure of grace,
and done great matters by it, and knoweth it too,” yet μηδὲν
μεγὰ, “fancies no great matter of himself for all this.” As
the Three Children in Daniel having received a miracle of
graces, which affected even the enemies of God, yet were
not affected with it themselves; enabled to be martyrs, and
yet live. Or as the poet of Callimachus‘ that stood after he
was dead; τί μ᾽ ἔπεμπες ἐς ἀθανάτους πολεμιστὰς; BadXo-
μεν, οὐ πίπτουσι, τιτρώσκομεν, οὐ φοβέουσι: which is Nebu-
chadnezzar’s phrase, walking “in the midst of the fire and yet
they have no hurt.” Yet in their εὐχαριστικὸν, “ their song
of praise,” all that they say of themselves is this, “and now we
cannot open our mouths ;” for this, saith Chrysostom, “ we
open our mouths that we may say this only, that it is not for
us to open our mouths.” By this low modest interpreta-
tion every Christian is to make of his own actions and gifts,
you may guess somewhat of the Pharisee’s misconceits.
For first, were he never so holy and pure, of never so spiri-
tual angelical composition, yet the very reflecting on these
excellencies were enough to make a devil of him. The
angels, saith Gerson®, as the philosopher’s intelligences,
have a double habitude, two sorts of employments natural
to them; one upwards, in an admiration of God’s great-
ness, love of His beauty, obedience to His will, moving as
it were a circular daily motion about God, their centre,—
as Boethius" of them, mentemque profundam circumeunt ;—
another downward, of regiment and power in respect of all
© Tom. v. p. 261. [This reference is f [Pantelius, ap. S. Maximum. Op.,
to Saville’s edition; to a homily on the tom. ii. p. 543, Anthol. Palat., tom. iii.
Pharisee and Publican, which is taken Append. Epigr. 58. ed. Jacobs. |
out of the fifth homily de Incomprehen- & Cf. Gerson. Tr. i. in Magnif.
sibili Dei Natura, tom. i. p. 489, C. ed. h [See Consol. Philosophie, lib. iii.
Ben. where the passage will be found.] Metrum ix. v. 16. p. 223, ed. Delphin.}
SERMON XX. 419
belov, which they govern and move and manage. Now if it
be questioned, saith he, which of these two be more honour-
able,—-for the credit of the angelical nature I determine con-
fidently, that of subjection pulchriorem et perfectiorem esse,
quam secunda regitive dominationis, “it is more renown to be
under God than over all the world besides;”’ as the service to
a king is the greatest preferment that even a peer of the
realm is capable of. And then if an angel should make a
song of exultance to set himself out in the greatest pomp, he
would begin it as Mary doth her Magnificat, “ For He hath [Luke i.
regarded the low estate of His servant :” so that the blessed ell
Virgin’s mention of her own lowliness, was not a piece only
of modest devotion, but an ὕψος of expression, and high
metaphysical insinuation of the greatest dignity in the world.
And then let the Pharisee be as righteous as himself can
fancy, come to that pitch indeed which the contemptuous
Opinionative philosophers feigned to themselves, λέγοντες
μὲν δεῖσθαι μηδενὸς, in Tatianus', which is in the Church of
Laodicea’s phrase, “1 am rich, and am increased in spiritual Rev. iii. 17.
wealth, and have need of nothing ;” or the fools in the Gos-
pel, “I have store laid up for many years ;” nay, to St. Paul’s [Luke
pitch, rapt so high, that the schools do question whether he τ !*
were viator or comprehensor, a traveller, or at his journey’s
end; yet the very opinion of God’s graces would argue him a
Pharisee ; this conceiving well of his estate is the foulest mis-
conceit. For if he be such a complete righteous person, so
accomplished in all holy graces, why should he thus betray
his soul, by depriving it of this ταπεινοφροσύνη, which the
very heathens could observe so absolutely necessary; this
humility and lowliness of mind, this useful and most inge-
nuous virtue always to think vilely of himself; not to ac-
knowledge any excellence in himself, though he were even
put upon the rack. The philosophers that wrote against
pride, are censured to have spoiled all by putting their names
to their books. Modesty, like Dinah*, desiring never so little
to be seen, is ravished. The sanctifying spirit that beautifies
the soul, is an humbling spirit also, to make it unbeauteous
i Contra Grecos, ὃ 25. [p. 265, A. k Gerson. Tr. 10. in Magnif. [Op.,
al calcem, Op., 5. Justini. Paris. tom. iv. p. 468, B.]
1742. ]
Ee2
420 SERMON XX.
inits own eyes. And this is the first misconceit, the first step
in Pharisaical hypocrisy, thinking well of one’s-self on what
ground soever ; contrary to that virgin grace, humility, which
is a virtue required not only of notorious infamous sinners—
for what thanks or commendation is it for him to be on the
ground that hath fallen and bruised himself in his race? for
him that is ready to starve, to go a begging ?—but chiefly and
mainly of him that is most righteous; when he that knows a
great deal of good by himself, μεγάλα κατορθώματα", a great
deal of good success in the spirit, yet μηδὲν μέγα φαντάζεται,
is not advanced a whit at the fancy of all this.
The Pharisee’s second misconceit is a favourable overpriz-
ing of his own worth, expecting a higher reward than it in
proportion deserves. When looking in the glass he sees all
far more glorious in that reflect beam than it is in the direct,
all the deformities left in the glass, and nothing but fair re-
turned to him, a rough harsh unpleasing voice smoothed, and
softened, and grown harmonious in the echo: there is no
such cheating in the world as by reflections. A looking-glass
by shewing some handsome persons their good faces, and
that truly, hath often ruined them by that truth, and be-
trayed that beauty to all the ugliness and rottenness in the
world; which had it not been known by them, had been en-
joyed. But then your false glasses, what mischief and ruin
have they been authors of! how have they given authority
to the deformedest creatures to come confidently on the
stage, and befooled them to that shame which a knowledge
of their own wants had certainly prevented! What difference
there may be betwixt the direct species of a thing, and the
same reflected, the original and the transcript, the artificial
famous picture of Henry the Fourth of France will teach
you; where in a multitude of feigned devices, a heap of
painted, fantastical chimeras, which being looked on right
resembled nothing, being ordered to cast their species upon
a pillar of polished metal reflected to the spectator’s eye the
most lively visage of that famous king. He that hath not
seen this piece of art, or hath not skill in catoptricks enough
to understand the demonstrable grounds and reasons of it,
may yet discern as much in nature, by the appearance of a
1S, Chrysost. [Hom. v. de Incompreh. Dei natura, tom. i. p. 489, C.]
SERMON XX. 421
rainbow, where you may sce those colours reflected by the
cloud, which no philosopher will assert to be existent there.
And all this brings more evidence to the Pharisee’s indict-
ment, and demonstrates his opinion of his own actions or
merits to be commonly deceivable and false.
He sees another man’s actions radio recto, by a direct
beam, and if there be no humour in his eye, if it be not
glazed with contempt or envy, or prejudice, he may perhaps
see them aright. But his own he cannot see but by re-
flection, as a man comes not to see his own eyes, but in the
shadow, and at the rebound; whereupon Alcinous the Pla-
tonic, calls this act of the soul, τῆς ψυχῆς πρὸς ἑαυτὴν διά-
λογον, a dialogue of the soul with itself, and the knowledge
that comes from thence, ἀναζωγράφησιν, a resemblance by
shadowing. The soul understands, and wills its object ; this
act of it by its species is cast upon the fancy, and from thence,
as even now from the column of brass, or bell-metal, it is
reflected to the understanding: and then you may guess
what a fair report he is likely to receive, when a Pharisee’s
fancy hath the returning of it. He that with his own
clearest eyes could take a gnat for a taller unwieldier crea-
ture than a camel, and thereupon strains at it, what would he
do if he should come to his multiplying glass! He that when
he sees a mote, and that radio recto, in other’s eyes, can mis-
take it for a beam, how can he, think you, improve the least
atom of good, when he is to look on it in himself! How will
his fancy and he, the one a cheat from the beginning, the
other full greedy of the bait, fatten and puff up a sacrifice
that he himself hath offered! O how fair shall it appear, and
ready to devour all the seven fat ones, though it be the
thinnest of Pharaoh’s lean kine, lank and very ill favoured !
How shall the reflection of his beggarliest rags return to his
eye the picture of a king! and the ordinariest vapour, or
cloud of his exhaling, be decked over with all the beauty and
variety of the rainbow! What Aristotle™ said of the Sophists,
that they did φυλετικῶς ἐμφυσᾶν ἑαυτοὺς, though it be a
puzzling place for the critics, this censor or Aristarchus in
my text, will interpret by his practice; he blows up him-
m [See Arist. Sophist. Elench. i. J. ]
Matt.
Xxili. 24,
Wisd. xiii.
ver. 12.
4.22 SERMON XX.
self, as they were used to do their meat against a φυλετικὸν
δεῖπνον", a tribune’s or a sheriff’s feast, that it may look the
fairer, and not deceive others only, but himself; forgets what
he has done, and now thinks it is his natural complexion:
as the carpenter in the thirteenth of Wisdom; that piece of
wood which himself had just now carved into an idol, he
presently prays to and worships as a god: or as hars, that
by telling a tale often at last begin to believe themselves; so
hath he befooled himself into a credulity: the farthing alms
he hath given shall by a strange kind of usury (yet not
stranger perhaps than what he deals in daily) be fancied
into a mountain of gold, and the bare calves of their lips
become hecatombs. If he have abstained from flesh when
the market would yield none, or forborne to eat a supper
after a notorious feast, he will call this “ fasting twice in the
week,” and avouch himself an obedient abstemious subject and
Christian, though Good Friday be witness of his unchristian
epicurism. If he afford the minister the tenth of his house-
rent, an annual benevolence far below that that his dues
would come to, which by taking of a jolly fine at first, is for
ever after pared into but a larger sort of quit-rents,—though
his extortion bring in no revenue to any but the devil and
himself,—he will yet be confident with the Pharisee, “I
pay tithes of all that I possess.”
A pittance of virtue in a Pharisee is like the polypod’s
head, to which Plutarch? compares poetry, hath some good,
but as much or more ill in it also; sweet indeed and nutritive,
saith he; and so is all virtue though simply moral, good
wholesome diet for the soul, but withal ταρακτικὴ, it sends
up vapours into the brain, and ends in whimseys and strange
and troublesome dreams: the man fancies, I know not what,
presently of himself; like learning in an ill-natured man, all
about him are the worse for it; one moral virtue tires some-
times the whole vicinity of natural good-disposed gifts: it
were well perhaps for his ingenuity and modesty that he
were not so virtuous, that one drop of water being attenuated
into air hath taken up all the room in the bladder: it were
© [Cf. Alexand. Aphrod. ad loc. in ire debeat, ὃ 1. p. 56. tom, i. pt. 1. ed.
Schol. ed. Berl. } Wyttenb. |
P [Quomodo Adolescens Poetas aud-
SERMON XX. 423
as good for the heart to be shrivelled up, as thus distended,
it must be squeezed again to make place for some more sub-
stantial guest, and be emptied quite, that it may be filled.
In brief, it is the small measure, and this only of airy, empty
piety, that hath puffed up the man. As they saya little cri-
tical learning makes one proud ; if there were more it would
condensate and compact itself into less room.
And generally the more there is within, the less report
they give of themselves; as St. Matthew mentioning himself
before his conversion, doth it distinctly, by the name of Mat- Matt. ix. 9.
thew, and his trade sitting at the receipt of custom, “ Matthew
the publican,” by that odious re-naming of sin,—whereas all
the other Evangelists call him Levi, or the son of Alpheus,— [Mark ii.
but leaves out the story of his own feasting of Christ,—only eee
‘©as Christ sat at meat in the house,’—which St. Luke sets Matt. ix.
down exactly, “and Levi made hima great feast,” or as in the !°-
history of St. Peter’s fall and repentance in the Gospel accord- ae ae
ing to St. Mark ;—which the primitive Church agree that St.
Peter had a hand in it ;—his denial is set down with all the
aggravating circumstances, more than in all the rest put
together, “he began to curse and swear, I know not this Mark xiv.
man of whom you speak:” two Evangelists say only, he ΤΩΣ
denied him the third time; to this St. Matthew adds, “ he xxii. 61;
cursed and sware, saying, I know not the man.” But he in 4) a.
his own witness, most exactly in aggravating the sin, “I
know not this,’ &c. But when he comes to the mention
of his repentance, when the two other say, ἔκλαυσε πικρῶς,
he himself, or St. Mark from him, only ἔκλαιε, he wept;
always speaking as much bad and as little good of them-
selves as can be.
A little windy opinionative goodness distempers the empty
brain, it is charity must ballast the heart; and that is the
grace, according to holy Maximius’ opinion 4, that all this
while we have required, but not found in the Pharisee, and
that is the reason that the brass sounds so shrill, and the
cymbal tinkles so merrily. And this is the Pharisee’s second
misconceit, his overprizing his own good deeds and graces.
The third is,
His opinion of the consistence and immutability of his
4 [Cf. Centena Capita de Caritate, i. § 47, &c. Op., tom. i. p. 400.]
Ezek. xvi.
(3, sq-]
424 SERMON XX.
present estate, without any, either consideration of what he
hath been, or fear what he may be again ; he hath learnt or
rather abused so much Scripture, as that the yesterday and
the morrow must care for themselves; Prometheus or Epi-
metheus are profane heathen names to him; he is all in
contemplation of present greatness; like the heathen gods,
which are represented to have nothing to do but admire
their own excellencies. “ I thank God that I am not,” &e.
The Pharisee having a first-born’s portion from the hand of
God, will not be rude or importunate with Him for new and
fresh supplies; nor will he disparage himself so much as to
suspect the perpetuity of his enjoyment. Καλὸς παρρησίας
θησαυρὸς εὐγένεια. saith Plutarch’, “a man that is honour-
ably and freely born hath a fair treasure of confidence,” and
so a natural advantage of other men; but bastards and men
of a cracked race, ὑπόχαλκον καὶ κίβδηλον ἔχοντες γένος,
that have a “ great deal of copper or dross mixed” with their
or and argent, ταπεινοῦσθαι πέφυκε, “ these men are born to
be humble” and shamefaced. But amongst these con-
templations he may do well to consider the Amorite his
father, and his mother the Hittite, the pollutions and blood
he was clothed with in the day that he was born, the accursed
inheritance as well of shame as sin derived unto him. For
then certainly he would never so plume himself in his pre-
sent sunshine. If he have not gotten in the ὑπόκαυστον,
among the Adamites in Epiphanius‘, and there set up for one
of Adam’s sect before his fall, or the Valentinianst which
called themselves the spirituals, and the seed of Abel, who
indeed never had any natural seed we hear of. If he will
but grant himself of the ordinary composition and race of
men, come down from Adam either by Cain or Seth, I am
sure he shall find sins past enough either in his person or
nature to humble him, be he never so spiritual. And then
for the time to come, Christ certainly was never so espoused
to any soul, as to be bound to hold it for better for worse.
That if he find aught in that spouse contrary to the vow of
wedlock, he can azoréwrewv",—the word used in divorces
τ [De Liberis Educandis, ὃ 2. ] t Td., lib. i. Her. 31. § 23. Op., tom.
s [Epiphan., lib.ii. Heresis 32. Op., 1. p. 192, B, C, sq.]
tom. i. p. 438. ] " (Cf. e.g. Demosth., p. 1562. 25.]
SERMON XX. 425
amongst the Athenians on the husband’s part,—send the soul
out of his house or temple; especially if she do ἀπολείπειν,---
the phrase used on the woman’s part,—if she leave or forsake
the husband, if she draw back or subduce herself out of his Heb. x. 8.
house, “by an evil heart of unbelief, openly depart from the Heb. iii.
living God.” It is observed by the critics as an absurd Se
ridiculous phrase in some authors, to call the emperors divi
in their life-time, which, saith Rittershusius, when the pro-
priety of the Roman tongue was observed, capitale fuisset,
had been a grand capital crime. And as absurd no doubt is
many men’s ἀποθέωσις and ἀπαθανατισμὸς, their canoniz-
ing, securing and besainting themselves in this life, upon
every slight premature persuasion that they are in Christ.
That which Aphrodisius” on the Topics observes of the leaves
of trees, may perhaps be too true of the spiritual estate and
condition of men, that the vine, ard fig, and plane tree, which
have thin broad leaves, and make the fairest show, φυλλο-
ροοῦσι, do thereupon shed them presently : some few indeed,
the olive, bay, and myrtle, which have narrow solid leaves,
are able to keep them all the year long, ἀείφυλλα and
ἀειθαλῆ, always green and flourishing. And God grant such
laurels may for ever abound in this paradise, this garden of
the land; that the children of this mother may environ her
like olive plants round about her table; this perhaps you
will count an high thing, to shed the leaf, but what think you
of extirpation and rooting up? even this you shall hear de-
nounced, and executed on those that cast a fair shadow,
either as on degenerous or unprofitable trees; either for bad
fruit, or none at all, “Cut it down, why cumbereth it the [Luke xiii.
ground ?” el
But to our purpose ; when St. Paul therefore resolves that Rom. viii.
nothing should “ever separate him from the love of God,” [59
sin is there left out of the catalogue; be he never so pos-
sessed of that inheritance, for aught he knows this very con-
fidence may root him out again. His brethren the Jews
thought their estate as irreversible as the Pharisee’s here;
and upon as good grounds as he can pretend; the very pro-
mise of God to Abraham’s seed indefinitely ; and yet by that
time this parable was spoken, they can bring him word of
Y Alex. Aphrod. in Top. Arist. [f. 63, Aldus. ]
t(Corsx:
12;
[ Matt. iv.
6.]
426 SERMON XX.
the repeal of that promise, within a while sealed and con-
firmed by their πανωλεθρία, their instant utter destruction ;
a forerunner of which, if not the cause, was this confidence
of their immutable estate.
It was a fancy of the Stoics mentioned by Plutarch *, περὶ
πάντα κατορθοῦν τὸν ἀστεῖον, that a “wise man could do no-
thing amiss,” that all that he did was wise and virtuous. And
they that will have men saved and damned by a stoical neces-
sity, now-a-days, may borrow this fancy of the Stoics also;
but Homer, saith he, and Euripides long since exploded it.
T am sure St. Paul will fairly give any man leave that takes
himself to be in a good estate now, to fear a bad before he
die; to expect a tempest in a calm; or else he would not
have been so earnest with him that “ thinks he stands, to take
heed lest he fall.’ It was the confidence of a Turk, 1. 6.
a Stoic revived, in Nicetas Chon., that said he knew they
must overcome, on now for ever, as having got ἕξιν tod νικᾶν,
an “habit of conquering :” and it was well if this assurance
did not take the pains to lose it him again. It is the rheto-
ric of discreet captains to their soldiers in Thucydides ¥, and
other historians, to exhort them to fight on comfortably and
courageously, as having overcome, in remembrance of their
past victories as pawns and pledges of the future: but it is
always on condition and presumptions of the same diligence
and valour which formerly they shewed. And the same mili-
tary encouragements and munition the fathers frequently
furnish us with against our spiritual warfare, but all rather
to increase our diligence than security, to set us to work on
hope of success, not to nourish us in idleness in hope of a vic-
tory. If we should suffer the devil from this proposition, “he
will give His angels charge” that a child “of His shall not
dash his foot against a stone,” and then that assumption,
thou art the child of God, to conclude that thou canst not
hurt thyself with a fall, he would straight back that with a
mitte te deorsum, “ Cast thyself down,” to shew what thou
canst do; and then if thou hast not another scriptum est to
rejoinder, thou “shalt not tempt,”’—then this confidence is
tempting of God,—I know not how thou wilt be able to
* [De Audiend. Poetis, tom. vi. p. 89, Reiske.]
ἡ [Cf e.g. Thucyd. ii, 89; vii. 66.]
> ak ah
SERMON XX. 4.27
escape a precipice, a bruise if not a breaking. The Valen-
tinian having resolved himself to be πνευματικὸς 5, “ spiri-
tual,” confessed indeed that other men must get some store
of faith and works to help them to heaven, ἑαυτὸν δὲ μὴ
δεῖσθαι Sia τὸ φύσει πνευματικὸν εἶναι. “But they had
no need of either, because of their natural spiritualness ;”
that which is spiritual cannot part with its spiritual hyposta-
sis whatever it do or suffer; no more than gold by a sink
can lose its lustre; or the sunbeams be defamed by the dung-
hill they shine on. They commit all manner of impurity, saith
he, and yet they are σπέρματα ἐκλογῆς, “seeds of the elec-
tion ;” the seeds indeed, deep set in the earth, that take root
downward, but never bear fruit upward ; they never spring at
all except it be towards hell; nor sprout out any branch or
stalk of works, unless it be of darkness. These forsooth have
grace ἰδιόκτητον, as their “proper possessions,” all others
but to use, and so it seemed, for they of all others made no
use of it. There was another like fancy in the same Irenzus?,
of Marcus and his followers, that by the ἀπολύτρωσις, a form
of baptizing that they had, that they were become dépata τῷ
κριτῇ, “invisible to the judge,” then if ever they were appre-
hended it were but calling to the Mother of Heaven, and she
would send the helmet in Homer, that they should presently
vanish out of their hands. Thus have men been befooled by
the devil to believe that their sacred persons could excuse
the foulest acts, and as it was said of Cato, even “make
crimes innocent ;” thus have some gotten the art of sinning
securely, nay, religiously, as he that in our English history
would put his neighbours in a course to rebel legally. But
I hope all these fancies have nothing to do but fill up the
catalogues in Ireneus and Epiphanius; I trust they shall
never be able to transplant themselves into our brains
or hearts. But pray God there be no credence of them
scattered here and there among hasty, ignorant, over-
weening Christians. A man shall sometimes meet abroad
some reason to suspect it, yet it were pity to fear so far as
to set to confute them. There may be indeed a state and
condition of Christians, so well settled and rivetted by Christ
2 (S. Ireneus adv. Her., lib. i. 6. 6. ἀλλὰ διὰ τὸ φύσει πνευματικοὺς εἶναι.
Op. tom.i,p.29, αὐτοὺς δὲ μὴ διὰ πράξεως, a (Id., lib. i. ¢. xiii, ibid. p. 64.]
[ Psalm
Ixxxix.34, ]
Exod. xvii.
[17.]
ver. 16.
[Luke xxii.
52]
428 SERMON XX.
in grace, that their estate may be comfortably believed im-
mutable, an election under oath, perhaps that mentioned by
the Psalmist, “I have sworn by My holiness, I will not fail
David ;” for spiritual blessings are frequently in Scripture
conveyed along with temporal. But it is much to be doubted,
that those men that have boldness to believe this of them-
selves, have not ballast enough of humility and fear to make
it good. Porphyry had so much divinity in him as to observe
that καθάρσια were the only ἀποτρόπαια ἃ, that perpetual
washings, and purgings and lustrations, were the only means
to defend or deliver from evil, either to come or present; the
only amulets and ἀλεξίκακα in the world; it is the rainbow
in the heaven reflected thither from a cloud of tears below,
that is, God’s engagement never again to drown the earth.
But then there must be also another bow in the heart, that
must promise for that, that it shall not be like a deceitful
bow, go back again to folly, never again be drowned with
swinish, bestial, filthy lusts. In the 17th of Exodus the
Israelites prevailed against Amalek, and that miraculously
without any sensible means; and verse 16 the promise is
made for the future, that the “ Lord will fight with Amalek
for ever ;” where by the way the LXX. put in ἐν κρυφαίᾳ
χειρὶ, “God will fight against Amalek as it were under-
hand,” by secret hidden strength; which addition of theirs
—if it were inspired into the translators, as St. Augustin? is
of opinion, all their variations from the Hebrew are θεόπνευ-
στα, and so Canon—then happily that κρυφαία yelp may sig-
nify some secret infusion of supernatural power into Moses’
hands; that there is promised, answerable to that same effu-
sion of grace, to enable all the people of God in our fight
with sin, the spiritual Amalek, by which grace Moses and
the Christians have assurance to prevail. And this may be
ground enough for a Christian; Christ hath prayed, and God
promised that “your faith shall not fail.” But then all this
while the story of the day will tell us on what terms this
security of victory stood, if so be Moses continue to hold up
his hands; noting 1. the power of prayer; 2. of obedience ;
3. of perseverance; and upon these terms even a Pharisee
@ [De Abstin., lib. ii. § 44.]
> [De Ciyit. Dei, xviii. ο. 43. Op., tom, vii. p. 525. ]
SERMON XX. 429
may be confident without presumption; but if his hands be
once let down; if he remit of his Christian valour—for so
manus demittere signifies in agonistics—“ Amalek prevails.”
Just as it fared with Samson, he had an inconceivable por-
tion of strength, even a ray of God’s omnipotence bestowed
on him, but this not upon term of life, but of his Nazarite’s
vow, i. e. asthe LX XII. render it, εὐχὴ ἀφαγνίσασθαι ἁγνείαν
Κυρίῳ, “a prayer as well as ἃ vow;” and that of separating
or “hallowing purity and sanctity to the Lord ;” and his vow
being broken, not only that of his hair, but with it that of his
holy obedience, that piece of divinity presently vanished, and
the Philistines deprived him of his eyes and life. And there-
upon it is observable that which is in the Hebrew in perform-
ing a vow, is rendered by the LXXII. μεγαλῦναι τὴν εὐχὴν,
“to magnify a vow,” then is the vow or resolution truly great
that will stand us in stead when it is performed. As for all
others they remain as brands and monuments of reproach to
us; upbraiding us of our inconstancy first, then of disobedi-
ence; and withal as signs to warn that God’s strength is
departed from us. I doubt not but this strength being thus
lost, may return again before our death, giving a plunge, as
it did in Samson when he plucked the house about their ears
at last. But this must be by the growing out of the hair again,
the renewing of his repentance and sanctity with his vow,
and by prayer unto God, “ Lord God,” or as the LXXIL.,
Κύριε, Κύριε δυνάμεων, “ Remember me, I pray Thee, and
strengthen me,” but for all this, it was said before in the
19th verse, his ‘‘ strength,” and in the 20th verse, the ‘ Lord
was departed from him.” And so no doubt it may from
us, if we have no better security for ourselves than the pre-
sent possession, and a dream of perpetuity. For though no
man can excommunicate himself by one rule, yet he may by
another, in the canon law; that there be some faults excom-
municate a man ipso facto; one who hath committed them,
the law excommunicates, though the judge do not; you need
not the application ; there be perhaps some sins and devils like
the Carian scorpions which Apollonius and Antigonus* men-
tion out of Aristotle’, which when they strike strangers, do
¢ [Antigonus, Hist. Mirab. c. 18. Apollonius, Hist. Comment., ο, xi.
ap: Meursium, Op., tom. vii. p. 13. ibid., p. 157.]
Exod. xvii.
De
Numb. vi.
9
a
Numb. xv.
Judg. xvi.
ver. 22.
ver. 21.
ver. 19.
ver. 20.
[2 Cor. xii.
2]
[1 Pet. ii,
2.)
430 SERMON XxX.
them no great hurt, ἐπεχωρίους δὲ αὐτίκα ἀποκτείνουσι, “pre-
sently kill their own countrymen ;” some devils perhaps that
have power to hurt only their own subjects; as sins of weak-
ness and ignorance, though they are enough to condemn
an unregenerate man, yet we hope, through the merits of
Christ into whom he is ingrafted, οὐ λίαν ἀδικοῦσι πατά-
Eaves, ‘shall do httle hurt to the regenerate,” unless it be
only to keep him humble, to cost him more sighs and pray-
ers. But then, saith the same Apollonius‘ there, your Baby-
lonian snakes that are quite contrary, do no great hurt to
their own countrymen, but are present death to strangers ;
and of this number it is to be feared may presumption prove,
and spiritual pride; sins that the ἐπιχώριοι, the deyil’s
natives, ordinary habitual sinners need not much to fear;
but to the stranger, and him that is come from afar, think-
ing himself, as St. Paul was, dropped out of the third heaven,
and therefore far enough from the infernal country, it is to
be feared I say, they may do much mischief to them. And
therefore as Porphyry®* says of Plotinus in his life, and that
for his commendation, that he was not ashamed to suck
when he was eight years old, but as he went to the schools
frequently diverted to his nurse; so will it concern us for the
getting of a consistent firm habit of soul, not to give over the
nurse when we are come to age and years in the spirit, to
account ourselves babes in our virility, and be perpetually a
calling for the dug, the “sincere milk of the word,” of the
sacraments, of the Spirit, and that without any coyness or
shame, be we in our own conceits, nay, in the truth, never
so perfect, full-grown men in Christ Jesus.
And so much be spoken of the first point proposed, the
Pharisee’s flattering misconceit of his own estate; and therein
implicitly of the Christian’s premature deceivable persuasions
of himself; 1. thinking well of one’s-self on what grounds so-
ever; 2. overprizing of his own worth and graces; 3. his
opinion of the consistency and immutability of his condition,
without either thought of what is past, or fear of what is to
come. Many other misconceits may be observed, if not in
the Pharisee, yet in his parallel the ordinary confident Chris-
tian ; as 1. that God’s decree of election is terminated in their
4 Cap. 12. [ibid. ] 7 © [In vita Plotini, ὃ 3.]
SERMON XX. 43]
particular and individual entities, without any respect to their
qualifications and demeanours: 2. that all Christian faith is
nothing but assurance, a thing which I touched ἐν παρέργῳ,
in the preface, and can scarce forbear now I meet with it
again: 38. that the gospel consists all of promises of what
Christ will work in us, no whit of precepts or prohibitions:
4. that it is a state of ease altogether and liberty, no whit of
labour and subjection; but the Pharisee would take it ill if
we should digress thus far, and make him wait for us again
at our return. We hasten therefore to the second part, the
TO ῥητὸν, or natural importance of the words, and there we
shall find him standing apart, and thanking God only per-
haps in compliment; his posture and language give notice of
his pride, the next thing to be touched upon.
Pride is a vice either 1. in our natures, 2. in our educa-
tions, or 3. taken upon us for some ends: the first is a dis-
ease of the soul, which we are inclined to by nature; but
actuated by a full diet, and inflation of the soul, through
taking in of knowledge, virtue, or the like ; which is intended
indeed for nourishment for the soul, but through some vice
in the digestive faculty, turns all into air and vapours, and
windiness, whereby the soul is not fed but distended, and not
filled but troubled, and even tortured out of itself. To this
first kind of pride may be accommodate many of the old
fancies of the poets and philosophers, the giants fighting
with God, i.e. the ambitious daring approaches of the soul
toward the unapproachable light, which cost the angels so
dear, and all mankind in Eve, when she ventured to taste of
the tree of knowledge. Then the fancy of the heathens
mentioned by Athenagoras‘, that the souls of those giants
were devils; that it is the devil indeed, that old serpent, that
did in Adam’s time, and doth since animate and actuate this
proud soul, and set it a moving. And Philoponus® saith that
winds and tumours, i.e. lusts and passions, those trouble-
some impressions in the soul of man, are the acceptablest
sacrifices, the highest feeding to the devils; nay, to the very
damned in hell, who rejoice as heartily to hear of the con-
f [Legat. pro Christianis, p. 303.C. Comment. in Aristot. de Anima pref.
(ad calcem op. S. Justini.) } prope fin.
8 [Refers probably to Philoponus,
[ Ps. xlix.
14. ]
4.32 SERMON XX.
version of one virtuous, or learned man to the devil, of such
a brave proselyte, I had almost said, as the angels in heaven
at the repentance and conversion of a sinner. This is enough
I hope to make you keep down this boiling and tumultuous-
ness of the soul, lest it make you either a prey, or else com-
panions for devils ; and that is but a hard choice, nay, a man
had far better be their food than their associates, for then
there might be some end hoped for by being devoured ; but
that they have a villainous quality im their feeding, they
bite perpetually but never swallow, all jaws and teeth, but
neither throats nor stomachs; which is noted perhaps by that
phrase in the Psalmist, “ Death gnaweth upon the wicked ;”
is perpetually a gnawing, but never devours or puts over.
Pride in our education is a kind of tenderness and chill-
ness in the soul, that some people by perpetual softness are
brought up to, that makes them uncapable and impatient of
any corporal or spiritual hardness; a squeasiness and rising
up of the heart against any mean, vulgar or mechanical con-
dition of men; abhorring the foul clothes and rags of a
beggar, as of some venomous beast: and consequently as
supercilious and contemptuous of any piece of God’s service,
which may not stand with their ease and state, as a starched
gallant is of any thing that may disorder his dress. Thus
are many brought up in this city to a loathing and detesta-
tion of many Christian duties, of alms-deeds, and instructing
their families in points of religion ; of visiting and comfort-
ing the sick, nay, even of the service of God, if they may not
keep their state there; but specially of the public prayers
of the Church, nothing so vulgar and contemptible in their
eyes as that. But I spare you, and the Lord in mercy do
so also.
The third kind of pride is a supercilious affected haughti-
ness, that men perhaps meekly enough disposed by nature,
are fain to take upon them for some ends, a solemn censorious
majestic garb, that may entitle them to be patriots of such
or such a faction ; to gain a good opinion with some, whose
good opinion may be their gain. Thus was Mahomet fain to
take upon him to bea prophet, and pretend that it was dis-
coursing with the angel Gabriel made him in that case, that
his new wife might not know that he was epileptical, and so
SERMON XX. 433
repent of her match with a beggar, and a diseased person.
And upon these terms Turkism first came into the world,
and Mahomet was cried up μέγιστος προφήτης, the greatest
prophet, (to omit other witness,) as the Saracen fragments
tell us, that we have out of Euthymius. Thus are imper-
fections and wants, sometimes even diseases, both of body
and mind, assumed and affected by some men to get autho-
rity to their persons, and an opinion of extraordinary reli-
gion; but rather perhaps more oil to their cruse, or custom
to their trading. But not to flutter thus at large any longer,
or pursue the commonplace in its latitude, the Pharisee’s
pride here expresseth itself m three things; 1. his posture,
standing apart ; 2. his manner of praying altogether by way
of thanksgiving; 3. his malicious contemptuous eye upon the
publican. The first of these may be aggravated against the
schismatic that separates from the Church, or customs, but
especially service and prayers of the Church. It is pride
certainly that makes this man set himself thus apart, whereas
the very first sight of that holy place strikes the humble
publican upon the knees of his heart afar off; as soon as he
was crept within the gates of the temple, he is more devout
in the porch than the Pharisee before the altar. The second,
against those that come to God in the pomp of their souls,
commending themselves to God, as we ordinarily use the
phrase, commending indeed not to His mercy, but accept-
ance; not as objects of His pity, but as rich spiritual pre-
sents ; not tears to be received into His bottle, but jewels
for His treasure. Always upon terms of spiritual exultancy,
what great things God hath done for their souls; how He
hath fitted them for Himself; never with humble bended
knees in acknowledgment of unworthiness with St. Paul,
who cannot name that word, sinners, but most straight sub-
sume in a parenthesis, of “ whom I am the chief.” And for
the expression of the opinion he had of his own sanctity, is
fain to coin a word for the purpose, ἐλαχιστότερος, a word
not to be met with in all Greek authors again before he used
it, “less than the least of the saints.” And Jacob in a like
phrase, “I am less than all Thy mercies.” The Litany that
begins and ends with so many repetitions importuning for
mercy, even conjuring God by all powerful names of rich
HAMMOND, Ff
1 Tim. i.
15.
Eph. iii. 8.
Gen. xxxii.
10.
434 SERMON XX.
mercy that can be taken out of His exchequer, to “ have
mercy upon us miserable sinners,” this is set aside for the pub-
hiean,—the sinner’s liturgy,—nay as some say, for the profane
people only, not to pray but to swear by. But this only as im
transitu, not to insist on. The third expression of his pride is
his malicious sullen eye upon the publican, and that brings
me to the next thing proposed at first, the Pharisee’s cen-
soriousness and insinuated accusations of all others. “1 am
not as other men, extortioners, &..... or even as this
publican.”
It were an ingenious speculation, and that which would
stand us in some stead in our spiritual warfare, to observe
what hints and opportunities the devil takes from men’s
natural inclinations to insinuate and ingratiate his tempta-
tions to them ; how he applies still the fuel to the fire, the
nourishment to the craving stomach ; and accommodates all
his proposals most seasonably and suitably to our affections ;
not to enlarge this καθόλου, in the gross, nor yet καθέκαστον,
to each particular, you may have a δεῖξις or taste of it in
the Pharisee.
To an easy-natured man whose soul is relaxed, and has its
pores open to receive any infection or taint, the devil presents
a multitude of adulterers, drunkards, &c., thereby to distil
the poison softly into him; to sweeten the sin and secure
him in the commission of it, by store of companions: but to
a Pharisee,—rugged, singular, supercilious person,—he pro-
poseth the same object under another colour. The many
adulterers, &c., that are in the world, not to entice, but to
incense him the more against the sin; not to his imitation,
but to his spleen and hatred: that seeing he can hope to gain
nothing upon him by bringing him in love with their sin, he
may yet inveigle him by bringing him in hatred with their
persons; and plunge him deeper through uncharitableness,
than he could hope to do by lust. He knows well the Phari-
see’s constitution is too austere to be caught with an ordinary
bait, and therefore puts off his title of Beelzebub, prince of
flies, as seeing that they are not now for his game; but trolls
and baits him with a nobler prey, and comes in the person of
a Cato or Aristarchus, a severe disciplinarian, a grave censor,
or, as his most satanical name imports, διάβολος, an accuser,
SERMON XX. 4.35
and then the Pharisee bites presently. He could not expect
to allure him forward, and therefore drives him as far back
as he can; that so he may be the more sure of him at the
rebound; as a skilful woodsman, that by windlassing pre-
sently gets a shoot, which, without taking a compass and
thereby a commodious stand, he could never have obtained.
The bare open visage of sin is not lovely enough to catch the
Pharisee, it must be varnished over with a show of piety;
with a colour of zeal and tenderness in God’s cause, and
then, the very devilishest part of the devil, his malice and
uncharitableness, shall go down smoothly with him. And
that this stratagem may not be thought proper to the meri-
dian only where the Pharisee lived, Leo‘ within five hundred
years after Christ, and other of the fathers, have observed
the same frequently practised by the devil among the primi-
tive Christians; ut quos vincere flamma ferroque non poterat,
ambitione inflaret, virus invidie infunderet, et sub falsa Chris-
tiani nominis professione corrumperet: that they whom per-
secution could not affright, ambition may puff up, envy
poison, and a false opinion of their own Christian purity
betray to all the malice in the world. Thus have heretics
and sectaries, in all ages, by appropriating to themselves those
titles that are common to all the children of God, left none
for any other, but of contumely and contempt: as soon as
they fancy to themselves a part of the spirit of God, taken
upon them the monopoly of it also. Thus could not the
Valentinians* be content to be πνευματικοὶ themselves ; but
all the world beside must be ψυχικὸς and ywixos, animal
and earthly. It were long to reckon up to you the idioms
and characters that heretics have usurped to themselves in
opposition and reproach, and even defiance of all others;
the Pharisee’s separati, Sadducee’s justi, Novatian’s καθαροὶ,
puri, Messalian’s precantes. As if these several virtues,
separation from the world, love of justice, purity, daily exer-
cise of prayer, were nowhere to be found but amongst them.
Even that judicious, learned, eloquent, yea and godly father
Tertullian’, is caught in this pitfall; as soon as he began to
relish Montanus’s heresy, he straight changeth his style,
1S. Leo Magn. [cf. supr. p. 406. ] ch. vi. ]
k (S. Irenzeus cont. Heres., lib. i. ' (Tertull. De Jejun, ad init. ]
Ff2
436 SERMON XX.
nos spirituales, and all other orthodox Christians psychici,
animal, carnal men. The devil could not be content that he
had gained him to Montanism,—an heresy which it is con-
fessed only a superlative care of chastity, abstinence, and
martyrdom, brought him to,—but he must rob him of his
charity too, as well as his religion. Not to keep any longer
on the wing in pursuit of this censorious humour in the
Pharisee and primitive heretics, the present temper and
constitution of the Church of God will afford us plenty of
observation to this purpose. Amongst other crimes with which
the Reformation charge the Romanists, what is there that we
so importunately require of them as their charity! that see-
ing with the apostolical seat they have seized upon the keys
of heaven also, they would not use this power of theirs so
intemperately, as to admit none but their own proselytes
into those gates, which Christ hath opened to all believers.
For this cause, saith Eulogius™ in Photius, were the keys
given to Peter, not to John or any other, because Christ
foresaw Peter would deny Him, that so by the memory of
his own failings, he might learn humanity to sinners, and be
more free of opening the gates of heaven, because he him-
self,—had it not been for special mercy,—had been excluded ;
other Apostles, saith he, having never fallen so foully, τάχα
ἂν ἀποτομώτερον αὐτοῖς διεκέχρηντο, “ might like enough
have used sinners more sharply:” but it was not probable
that Peter would be such a severe Cato; and yet there is not
a more unmerciful man under heaven than he that now
tyrannizeth in his chair. Spalatensis indeed, after his revolt
from us, could ingeniously confess, that he could have ex-~
pected comfortably, and perhaps have been better pleased,
to have been saved in the Church of England, with a thousand
pound a year, as in the Roman with five hundred pound. But
do not all others of them count this no less than heresy in
him thus to hope? Cudsemius" the Jesuit denies the English
m [ὅτι διὰ τοῦτο, φησὶν, οὔτε πρὸς
Ἰωάννην, οὔτε πρὸς ἕτερόν τινα τῶν μα-
θητῶν ἔφη ὁ σωτὴρ τό" καὶ δώσω σοι τὰς
κλεῖς τῆς βασιλείας τῶν οὐρανῶν, καὶ τὰ
ἑξῆς᾽ ἀλλ᾽ ἤ πρὸς Πέτρον, bs ἔμελλε τῷ
τῆς ἀρνήσεως περιπίπτειν ὀλισθήματι,
καὶ διὰ δακρύων καὶ μετανοίας ἀπονίπ-
τειν τὸ ἁμάρτημα, ἵνα τῷ καθ᾽ ἑαυτὸν ὗπο-
δείγματι πρὸς τοὺς ἐξαμαρτάνοντας φι-
λανθρωπότερον διατίθοιτο" οἱ γὰρ ἄλλοι
ἀπείραστοι γεγενηκότες, τάχα ἂν ἀπο-
τομώτερον αὐτοῖς diexexpnvTo.—Hulo-
gius ap. Photium, Biblioth., p. 1600. ed.
Hoeschel. ]
n [De desperata Calvini Causa, lib,
ies Md
SERMON XX. ᾿ 437
nation to be heretics, because they remain under a con-
tinual succession of bishops. But alas! how few be there of
them, which have so much charity to afford us! What fulmi-
nations and clattering of clouds is there to be heard in that
horizon! What anathematizing of heretics, i. 6. Protes-
tants! what excommunicating them without any mercy,
first out of the Church, then out of the book of life; and
lastly, where they have power, out of the land of the living!
And yet, would they be as liberal to us poor Protestants, as
they are to their own stews and seminaries of all unclean-
ness, then should we be stored with indulgences. But it
was Tertullian’s® of old, that there is no mercy from them to
be expected, who have no crime to lay against us but that we
are true Christians. If they would but allow one corner of
heaven to receive penitent humble Protestants, labouring for
good works, but depending on Christ’s merit ; if they would
not think us past hopes, or prayers, there might be possibly
hoped some means of uniting us all in one fold. But this pre-
cious Christian grace of charity being now so quite perished
from off the earth, what means have we left us, but our
prayers, to prepare or mature this reconciliation? Shall we
then take heart also, and bring in our action of trespass?
Shall we sit and pen our railing accusation in the form that
Christ uses against the Pharisees, ‘‘ Woe unto you Scribes
and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you shut up the kingdom
of heaven against men, for you neither go in yourselves,
neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in?” This
we might do upon better grounds, were we so revengefully
disposed ; but we fear to incur our Saviour’s censure, “ And
He turned and rebuked them, saying, Ye know not what
manner of spirits ye are οἵ." We should much mistake our
Christian spirit, if we should not in return to their curses,
intercede with God in prayer for them; first, that He will
bestow on them the grace of meekness or charity; then,
sincerity and uprightness, without wilful blindness and par-
tiality ; and lastly, to intercede for the salvation of all our
souls together. And this is the only way St. Paul hath left
us, “ by returning them good to melt them,” hoping and pray-
° [Cf. Tertull. Apoll., ο. 2.]
Matt, xxiii.
18.
Luke ix.
55.
Rom. xii.
20.
[ Prov. xxv.
16.}
458 SERMON XX.
ing in the words of Solomon, that by long forbearing this
great Prince of the West will be persuaded; and that our
soft tongues may in time break the bone. But whilst we
preach charity to them, shall we not betray partiality in our-
selves, by passing over that uncharitable fire that is breaking
out in our own chimneys? It were to be wished that this
Christian grace, which is liberal enough of itself, would be
entertained as gratefully as it is preached; we should not
then have so many wx ‘22, “sons of fire” amongst us as we
have; who being inflamed, some with faction, others with
ignorant prejudice, others with doting on their own abilities,
fall out into all manner of intemperate censures, 39m "27,
‘words of the sword,” all sharp contumelious invectives against
all persons, or doctrines, or lives that are not ordered or re-
vised by them. For what Photius? out of Josephus observes
among others to have been one main cause or prognostic of
the destruction of Jerusalem, the civil wars betwixt the &-
λωταὶ and the σικάριοι, the zealots and the cut-throats, pray
God we find not the same success amongst us. Whilst the
zealots, saith he, fell on the sicarii, the whole body of the
city, πικρῶς καὶ ἀνηλεῶς ἐσπαράττετο, “ was bitterly and
unmercifully butchered betwixt them;” and under one of
those two names all the people were brought to suffer their
part in the massacre. I desire not to chill or damp you
with unnecessary fears, or to suspect that our sims shall be
so unlimited as utterly to outvie and overreach God’s mer-
cies. But, beloved, this ill blood that is generally nourished
amongst us, if it be not a prognostic of our fate, is yet an ill
symptom of our disease. These convulsions and distortions
of one member of the body from another as far as it can pos-
sibly be distended, this burning heat, and from thence raving
and disquietness of the soul, are certainly no very comfortable
symptoms. When the Church and kingdom must be dicho-
tomized, precisely divided into two extreme parts, and all
moderate persons by each extreme tossed to the other with
furious prejudice; must brand all for heretics or carnal per-
sons that will not undergo their razor; and then, the con-
trary extreme, censure and scoff at their preciseness that will
not bear them company to every kind of riot ; these, beloved,
P [Biblioth., p. 36. ed. Hoeschel. }
SERMON XX. 439
are shrewd feverish distempers, pray God they break not
forth into a flame. When the boat that goes calmly with
the stream, in the midst of two impetuous rowers, shall be
assaulted by each of them, for opposing or affronting each ;
when the moderate Christian shall be branded on the one
hand for preciseness, on the other for intemperance, on the
one side for a puritan, on the other for a papist, or a re-
monstrant ; when he that keeps himself from either extreme,
shall yet be entitled to both; what shall we say is become of
that ancient primitive charity and moderation? The use,
beloved, that I desire to make of all this, shall not be to
declaim at either ; but only by this compass to find out the
true point that we must fail by. By this, saith Aristotle4,
you shall know the golden mediocrity, that it is complained
on both sides, as if it were both extremes; that may you
define to be exact liberality, which the covetous man censures
for prodigality, and the prodigal for covetousness. And this
shall be the sum not only of my advice to you, but prayers
for you; that in the Apostle’s phrase, “your moderation may
be known unto all men,” by this livery and cognizance, that
you are indited by both extremes. And if there be any such
Satanical art crept in amongst us, of authorizing errors or
sins on one side, by pretending zeal and earnestness against
their contraries; as Photius’ observes that it was a trick of
propagating heresies, by writing books entitled to the confu-
tation of some other heresy; the Lord grant that this evil
spirit may be either laid or cast out; either fairly led, or vio-
lently hurried out of our coasts.
I have done with the Pharisee’s censoriousness; I come
now in the last place to the ground, or rather occasion of it ;
his seeing the publican,—comparing himself with notorious
sinners ; “ I thank Thee that,” &c.
That verse which St. Paul cites out of Menander’s Thais,
that “wicked communication corrupts good manners,” is
grounded on this moral essay, that nothing raiseth up so
much to good and great designs as emulation; that he that
casts himself upon such low company, that he hath nothing
to imitate or aspire to in them, is easily persuaded to give
4 Eth, ii, 7. τ [Biblioth., p. 399. ad med.; and p. 259. ad fin. }
Phil. iv. 5.
1 Cor. xv.
33.
440 SERMON XX.
over any further pursuit of virtue, as believing that he hath
enough already, because none of his acquaintance hath any
more: thus have many good wits been cast away, by falling
unluckily into bad times, which could yield them no hints
for invention, no examples of poetry, nor encouragement for
any thing that was extraordinary. And this is the Phari-
see’s fate in my text, that looking upon himself, either in the
deceivable glass of the sinful world, or in comparison with
notorious sinners, extortioners, adulterers, publicans, sets
himself off by these foils, finds nothing wanting in himself,
so is solaced with a good comfortable opinion of his present
estate, and a slothful negligence of improving it. And this,
beloved, is the ordinary lenitive which the devil administers
tothe sharp unguiet diseases of the conscience, if at any time
they begin to rage,—the only conserve that he folds his bit-
terest receipts in, that they may go down undiscerned,—that
we are not worse than other men; that we shall be sure to
have companions to hell; nay, that we need not neither at
all fear that danger; for if heaven gates be so strait as not
to receive such sinners as we, the rooms within are like to be
but poorly furnished with guests; the marriage feast will
never be eaten, unless the lame and cripples in the street or
hospital be fetched in to fill the table. But, beloved, the com-
forts with which the devil furnisheth these men are,—if they
were not merely feigned and fantastical,—yet very beggarly
and lamentable, such as Achilles in Homer’ would have
scorned, only to be chief among the dead, or princes and
eminent persons in hell. We must set our emulation higher
than so, somewhat above the ordinary pitch or mark. Let
our designs fly at the same white that the skilfullest marks-
men in the army of saints and martyrs have aimed at before
us; that the ἀσκηταὶ, and ἀθληταὶ, and τροπαιοφόροι of the
Church, the religious exercisers and champions and trophy-
bearers of this holy martial field have dealt in. It is a poor
boast to have outgone heathens and Turks in virtue and good
works ; to be taller than the dwarfs, as it were, and pigmies
of the world; we must not be thus content, but outvie even
the sons of Anak, those tall, giantly, supererogatory under-
5 [Cf. Hom. Odyssey, xi. 491.]
Le aee..eeerCr
——
SERMON XX. 44]
takings of the proudest, nay, humblest Romanists. O what a
disgrace will it be for us Protestants at the dreadful day of
doom! O what an accession not only to our torments, but
our shame, and indignation at ourselves, to see the expecta-
tion of meriting in a papist, nay, the desire of being counted
virtuous in a heathen, attended with a more pompous train
of charitable magnificent deeds, of constant magnanimous
sayings, than all our faith can shew, or vouch for us! Shall
not the Romanist triumph and upbraid us in St. James’s
language, “Thou hast faith and I have works,” and all that Jam. ii. 18.
we can fetch out of St. Paul not able to stop his mouth from
going on, “shew me thy faith without thy works,” as our
English reads it out of the Syriac and vulgar Latin, “ and I
will shew thee my faith by my works?” It will be but a
nice distinction for thee then to say, that works are to be
separated from the act of justification, when they are found
separated a supposito, from the person also. But not to
digress ; the Pharisee seems here pretty well provided,—no
extortioner, no adulterer, guilty of no injustice. And how
many be there among you that cannot go thus far with the
Pharisee! Some vice or other perhaps there is, that agrees
not with your constitution or education ; drunkenness is not
for one man’s turn, prodigality for another’s, and I doubt
not but that many of you are as forward as the Pharisee to
thank God, or rather require God to thank them, that they
are not given to such or such a vice. But if you were to be
required here to what the Pharisee undertakes, if you were
to be arraigned at that severe tribunal, I say not concerning
your thoughts and evil communications, but even the gross
actual, nay, habitual sins; if a jury or a rack were set to
enquire into you throughly, how many of you durst pretend
to the Pharisee’s innocence and confidence, that you are
not extortioners, unjust, adulterers! Nay, how many be
there that have all the Pharisee’s pride and censoriousness,
and all these other sins too into the vantage! Certainly
there is not one place in the Christian world that hath more
reason to humble itself for two or all three of these vices,
than this city wherein you live. I am sorry I have said this,
and I wish it were uncharitably spoken of me; but though
it will not become me to have thought it of you, yet it will
442 SERMON XX.
concern you to suspect it of yourselves, that by acknowledg-
ing your guilts you may have them cancelled, and by judging
i. yourselves, prevent being judged of the Lord. And here
St. Chrysostom’s* caution will come in very seasonably toward
a conclusion of all, that the publican’s sins be not preferred
before the Pharisee’s works, but only before his pride. It
is not his store of moral virtues that was like to prove the
Pharisee’s undoing, but his overvaluing them; ταράττει οὐ
Ta πράγματα, ἀλλὰ δόγματα, saith the Stoic", appliable to
this also. It is not his imnocence that hath so encumbered
him all this while, but his opinion of it. The fasting and
the tithing must not be cast away, because the Pharisee was
proud of them; this were a furious discipline which would
down with all violently, that had ever been abused to idola-
try or sin; or with him in Plutarch*, that because poetry
had some ill consequences sometimes, would have the muses
and their favourites dispatched into Epicurus’s boat. His
counsel was more seasonable, that, to prevent drunkenness,
appointed them to mix water with their wine, that the mad
god might be allayed with a tame sober one; and that is the
caution that I told you of, that you abstract the Pharisee’s
works from his pride, and then borrow the publican’s humi-
lity from his works; that you come to the temple of God
with all the provision a Pharisee can boast of, and then lay
it down all at the publican’s feet, and take up his miserere,
his sighs, his dejection, his indignation at himself instead of
it, then shall you be fit to approach to that templum miseri-
cordie which Gerson speaks of, sine simulachro, &¢c., that had
not a picture or image of a saint in it, no manner of ostenta-
tion or show of works, non sacrificiis sed gemitibus, &c., not
to be visited with sacrifices but sighs, not to be filled with
triumphant ἐπινίκια, songs of rejoicing and victories, but
with the calm and yet ravishing rhetoric of the publican,
θεὸς ἱλάσθητί μοι [τῷ] ἁμαρτωλῷ, “Lord be merciful to me
a sinner.” Even so, O Lord, deal Thou with us, according
to Thy mercies; visit us with Thy salvation, draw us with
Thy mercies, and enlighten us with Thy Spirit, Thy hum-
bling Spirit to season us with a sense of our sins and un-
t [De Incomprehens. Dei Natura, * [Quom. Adolesc. Poet. aud. de-
Hom. v. Op., toin. i. p. 490, C.] beat., § 1. tom. vi. p. 53. ed. Reisk. ]
u Arrian Epict. Dissert. [i. 19. 7.]
SERMON XX. 44.3
worthiness ; Thy sanctifying Spirit to fill us here with all
holy sincere requisite graces ; and in the Spirit of Thy power
to accomplish us hereafter with that immarcessible crown of
glory.
Now to Hin, ἕο.
SERMON XXI.
Mart. ui. ὃ.
Prepare ye the way of the Lord.
Tart our preface may afford some light to our proceeding,
that it may prepare the way and stand us in stead hereafter
in our discourse of preparation, we will employ it to observe
that natural progress and method of all things, which con-
sists in steps and degrees: travelling on by those gists which
nature hath set them from one stage to another, from a lower
degree of perfection to an higher, built upon this ground of
nature, that the first things are always least perfect, yet abso-
lutely necessary to the perfection of the last: and in sum, so
much the more necessary, by how much less perfect. Thus
is the foundation more necessary to an house than the walls,
and the first stone than the whole foundation, because the
walls are necessary only to the setting on of the roof, not to
the laying of the foundation; the foundation necessary both
to the walls and roof, but not to the first stone; because that
may be laid without the whole foundation: but the first
stone necessary to all the rest, and therefore of greatest and
most absolute necessity. The course of nature is delineated
and expressed to us by the like proceedings and method of
arts and sciences. So those general principles that are most
familiar to us, are the poorest and yet most necessary rudi-
ments required to any deeper speculation: the first stage of
the understanding in its peregrination or travel into those
foreign parts of more hidden knowledge is usually very
short; and it is most requisite it should be so; for beginning
at home with some κοιναὶ ἔννοιαι, and taking its rise at its
own threshold, thereby it advances the length, and secures
the success of the future voyage. Thus in politics hath the
SERMON XXI. 4.4.5
body of laws from some thin beginnings under Lycurgus,
Solon, Phaleas, and the like, by daily accessions and further
growth at last increased into a fair bulk; every age perfect-
ing somewhat, and by that degree of perfection making the
matter capable of a further; so that the very politics them-
selves, as well as each commonwealth, have been observed to
have their infancy, youth, and manhood, the last of which is
the only perfect state ; which yet this body had never attained
to, had it not been content to submit itself to the imperfec-
tion of the former. Thus also in practical philosophy there
be some preambula operationis, some common precepts which
must be instilled into us, to work a consistency in our tempers
firm enough for the undertaking and performing all moral
tasks. One excellent one Aristotle? learnt from Plato, in the
second of the Ethics, χαίρειν τε καὶ λυπεῖσθαν ois δεῖ, a skill
of ordering those two passions aright, joy and sorrow, an
habit never to rejoice or grieve but on just occasion: which
lesson we must con perfectly when we are young, and then
with years an easy discipline will bring on virtue of its own
accord. Lastly, in the transcendent knowledge of metaphysics,
which Aristotle would fain call wisdom, it is the philosophers’
labour, which they were very sedulous in, to invent and set
down rules to prepare us for that study: the best that
Aristotle hath is in the third of Metaph., to examine and
inform ourselves, περὶ ὧν ἀπορῆσαι Set πρῶτον, “which
things are chiefly worth doubting of,’ and searching after:
in which one thing if we would observe his counsel, if we
would learn to doubt only of those things which are worth
our knowledge, we should soon prove better scholars than
we are. Jamblichus’, beyond all the rest, most to the purpose
prescribes retiredness and contempt of the world, that so we
might ταῖς διεξόδοις τοῦ νοῦ ζῆν, ever “live and be nourished
by the excursions of the mind towards God;” where indeed
he speaks more like a Christian than a Pythagorean, as if he
had learnt Christ, to deny himself and the world, and follow
Him, and intended to come to that pitch and ἀκμὴ which
St. Paul speaks of, “The life which I now live in the flesh I Gal. ii. 20
live by faith,” &c. But to conclude this precognoscendum,
4 (Cf. Arist. Nic. Eth., lib. 11. 6, 2.] » (Arist. Metaph. B. ς. 1.1
¢ Jambl. Protrept., pp. 36, 37.
{1 Cor. xv.
46. |
440 SERMON XXI.
there be throughout all works of nature and imitations of art
some imperfect grounds on which all perfection is built ; some
common expressions with which the understanding is first
signed ; some ground-colours without the laying on of which
no perfect effigies or portraiture can be drawn. Nay thus it
is in some measure in spiritual matters also; we are men
before we are Christians: there is a natural life and there is
a spiritual life. And as in the resurrection, so also in the spi-
ritual παλυγγενεσία of the soul, “ first that which is natural,
and after that which is spiritual: and in the spiritual life
there be also its periods, the infancy, the youth and virility
of the spirit ; the first being most imperfect yet most neces-
sary, and preparing the way to the last perfection. To bring
all home to the business in hand; thus did it not befit the
Saviour of the world to come abruptly into it; to put on flesh
as soon as flesh had put on sin; the business was to be done
by degrees, and after it had been a long time in working, for
the final production of it, the fulness of time was to be ex-
pected. The law had its time of pedagogy to declare itself,
and to be obeyed as His usher for many years; and after all
this, He appears not in the world till His Baptist hath pro-
claimed Him; He makes not toward His court till His
harbinger hath taken up the rooms. He comes not to in-
habit either in the greater or lesser Jewry, the world or
man’s heart, till the precursor hath warned all to make
ready for Him; and this is the voice of the precursor’s
sermon and the words of my text, “ Prepare ye the way of
the Lord.”
Instead of dividing the words 1 shall unite them, and after
I have construed them to you, contrive that into one body
which would not conveniently be dismembered. ‘Erowafew
signifies to fit, to prepare, to make ready. “ Ye” are all those
to whom Christ should ever come. “The ways of the Lord”
are whatsoever is capable of receiving of Christ or His gospel,
peculiarly the hearts of the elect. The form of speech, im-
perative, notes the whole complexum to be one single duty
required of all the Baptist’s and my auditors, sub hac forma,
that every man’s heart must be prepared for the receiving
of Christ, or, punctually to imitate the order of the words in
my text, the preparation of the soul is required for Christ’s
SERMON XXI. 4.4.7
birth in us. For there is in every elect vessel a spiritual ἐν-
σάρκωσι», or “ mystical incarnation” of Christ, where the soul,
like Mary, is first overshadowed by the Holy Ghost, then con-
ceives, then carries in the womb, grows big, and at last falls
into travail and brings forth Christ. My text goes not thus
far to bring to the birth, neither will I. My discourse shall
be happy if it may be His Baptist, His πρόδρομος in your
hearts, to prepare them for His birth, which I shall endeavour
to do, first, by handling preparation in general; 2. the prepa-
ration here specified, of the soul; 3. in order to Christ’s-birth
in us.
And first of preparation in general; éro:ua€ere, “prepare ye,”
or make ready. The necessity of this performance to any un-
dertaking may appear by those several precedaneous methods
in common life, which have nothing in themselves to ingra-
tiate them unto us, but cost much toil and trouble, yet not-
| withstanding are submitted to. If the earth would answer
the farmer’s expectation without any culture or husbandry,
he would never be so prodigal towards it. But seeing it hath
proposed its fruitfulness under condition of our drudgery, we
plough, and harrow, and manure, and drain, and weed it, or else
we are sure to fare the worse at harvest. The variety of pre-
parations in these low affairs was by Cato and Varro and Co-
Jumella accounted a pretty piece of polite necessary learning.
And a Christian, if he will apply their rules to his spiritual
Georgics, the culture of his soul, shall be able to husband it
the better; and by their directions have a further insight
into those fallow grounds of his own heart, which the prophet [Hos. x.
speaks of. It were a great, and perhaps unnecessary journey, 12 1
to trace over the whole world of creatures to perfect this ob-
servation: almost every passage of nature will furnish you
with an example. Hence is it that they that had nothing but
natural reason to instruct them, were assiduous in this prac-
tice, and never ventured on any solemn business without as
solemn endeavours to fit themselves for the work they took
in hand; those series of preparations before the ancient athle-
tica, as anointing, and bathing, and rubbing, and dust, it
were fit enough for a sermon to insist on the exercise which
they prepared, for being reputed sacred and parts of their
solemnest worship; and the moral of them would prove of
Eph. vi.
12; 1 Cor.
ix. 26.
[ Acts xvii.
22.)
448 SERMON XXI.
good use to discipline, and to bring us up to those spiritual
agones mentioned in Scripture, as πάλη, Eph. vi. 12, πυγμὴ,
1 Cor. ix. 26, and in the same place δρόμος ἐν σταδίῳ, and
its preparative ὑπωπιασμὸς, wrestling, cuffing, and run-
ning, three of the five Olympian games adopted as it were
into the Church, and spiritualized by the Apostle for our
imitation. But to pass by these and the like as less apposite
for our discourse, what shall we think? Was it superstition,
or rather mannerliness, that made the Grecian priests so rub
and wash and scour themselves before they would meddle
with a sacrifice? δεισιδαιμονία it was, and that we construe
superstition ; but indeed it signifies an awe and reverence to
the deity they worship, and a fear and a care lest the unpre-
paredness of the priest should pollute their sacrifice; as it is
much to be feared that our holiest duties, for want of this
care, are turned into sin; the vanities and faults of our very
prayers adding to the number of those guilts we pray against,
and every sacrifice, even of atonement itself, needing some ex-
pation. To look awhile on the highest part, and as it were
the sacraments of their religion, their Eleusinia sacra, resemb-
ling in one respect Christian baptism, in another holy orders ;
what a multitude of rites and performances were required of
every one before his admission to them! For their μυστήρια
being divided into two classes, the lesser or lower sort were
preludia to the greater, or as the scholiast on Aristophanes 4
hath it more clearly to our purpose, προκάθαρσις καὶ Tpoay-
νευσι5 TOV μεγάλων, “a premundation or presanctification”
of them that sued to be admitted higher: as baptism, confir-
mation, and a Christian education in the Church, fits us for
the participations of those mysteries which the other sacra-
ments present to us, so that it punctually notes that prepa-
ration we here talk of: for before they were admitted to those
grand τελεταὶ and ἐποπτεία, they were, saith Suidas, to spend
a year or two in a lower form, undergo a shop of purga-
tions, λοῦτρα, καθάρσεις, and many more; so that Tertullian ®
could not without wonder and praise of their solemnities ob-
serve tot suspiria epoptarum, et mulitam in adytis divinitatem.
It was no mean toil nor ordinary merit that was required to
4 [ Plutarch. De Anditione. Op.,tom. Plut. v. 846.]
vi. p. 170. Reiske. Schol. on Aristoph. e Tertull., lib. i. in. Valent. ad init.
SERMON XXI. 449
make them capable‘ of these dyias τελεταὶ, as Aristophanes *
calls them. The ground of all the ceremony we may observe
to be the natural impurity which the heathens themselves
acknowledge to be in every man, as may appear most dis-
tinctly by Jamblichus ἢ, though they knew not clearly at what
door it came in at; sure they were they found it there, and
therefore their own reason suggested them that things of an
excellent purity, of an inherent or at least an adherent sanc-
tity, were not to be adventured on by an impure nature,
ἀλλὰ μετὰ τινῶν καθαρμῶν, saith Clementi, till it had by
some laborious prescribed means somewhat rid itself of its
_ pollutions ; and this the barbarian did μόνῳ λούτρῳ, saith he,
thinking the bare washing of the outward parts sufficient :
but the Grecians, whom learning had made more substantial
in their worship, required moreover an habituate temper of
passions, longam castimoniam et sedatam mentem, that the in-
ward calmness and serenity of the affections might perform
the promises of the outward purity. In sum, when they were
thus qualified and had fulfilled the period, or circle of their
purgation required to their μύησις, they were at length ad-
mitted intra adyta ad epoptica sacra, where all the mysteries
of their theology were revealed to them. All which seems to
me—as much as can be expected from their dim imperfect
knowledge—to express the state of grace and saving know-
ledge in the world; and also the office of ministering in sacred
things, into which no man was thought fit to be received or
initiated but he which had undergone a prenticeship of pur-
gations: for although those Eleusinia of theirs, at a Chris-
tian’s examination, would prove nothing but religious delu-
sions, containing some prodigies of their mythical divinity; in
sum, but grave specious puppets and solemn serious nothing ;
yet hence it may appear that the eye of nature, though cheated
in the main, taking that for a sacred mystery which was but
a prodigious vanity, yet kept itself constant in its ceremonies ;
would not dare or hope to approach abruptly to any thing
which it could believe to be holy. Now shall we be more
saucy in our devotions, and insolent in our approaches to
f { Plutarch. ibid. bol. iv. J
8 [ Aristoph. Nub. 304. ] i [Clemens Alexandr. Strom., lib. v.
» Protrept., [explanation of Sym- cap. 11. ὃ 71. p. 689.}
HAMMOND, ag
450 SERMON XXI.
either the throne of majesty or grace of our true God, than
they were to the unprofitable empty τελεταὶ of their false?
Shall we call the mannerliness of the heathen up in judg-
ment against the Christian rudeness? It will be an horrid
exprobration at the day of doom, when a neat, washed, re-
spectful Gentile shall put a swinish, miry, negligent Christian
to shame; such a one who never took so much care to trim
himself to entertain the Bridegroom, as the heathen did to
adore an empty gaud, a vain ridiculous bauble. Yet is not
their example prescribed you as an accomplished pattern, as
the pitch to aim at and drive no higher: but rather as a o77-
λιτευτικὸν, a sarcasm or contumely engraved in marble to
upbraid you mightily if you have not gone so far. All that
they practised was but superficial and referring to the body,
and therein the washing of the outsides; yours must be in-
ward, and of the soul; which is the next word in the doc-
trine, the specification of it by the subject noted im the text
by τὴν ὁδὸν, “the way,” and expressed in the latter part of
the subject of my proposition, the preparation of the soul.
This preparation consists in removing those burdens, and
wiping off those blots of the soul, which any way deface or
oppress it; in scouring off that rust and filth which it con-
tracted in the womb, and driving it back again as near in-
tegrity as may be. And this was the aim and business of
the wisest among the ancients, who conceived it possible
fully to repair what was lost, because the privation was not
total; and findig some sparks of the primitive flame still
warm within them, endeavoured and hoped hard to enliven
them. To this purpose a great company of them, saith St.
Austin), puzzled themselves in a design of purging the soul
per θεουργίαν, et consecrationes theurgicas, but all im vain, as
Porphyry himself confesses ; ‘‘ No man,’’saith he, “ by this the-
urgic magic could ever purge himself the nearer to God, or
wipe his eyes clear enough for such a vision.” They indeed
went more probably to work, which used no other magic or
exorcism to cast out these devils, to clear and purge the soul,
but only their reason, which the moralist set up and main-
tained against θυμὸς and ἐπιθυμία, the two ringleaders of ἡ
sensuality. To this purpose did Socrates, the first and wisest
j [Cf 8. August. De Civit. Dei, lib. x. ¢. 9. Op., tom. vii. p. 245.]
SERMON XXI. 451
moralist, furnish and arm the reasonable faculty with all helps
and defensations that philosophy could afford it, that it might
be able to shake off and disburden itself of those encum-
brances which naturally weighed and pressed it downward,
ut exoneratus animus naturali vigore in eterna se attolleret*:
where if that be true which some observe of Socrates, that
his professing to know nothing was because all was taught
him by his δαιμόνιον, I wonder not that by others his daz-
μόνιον is called θεὸς, and consecrated into a deity: for cer-
tainly never devil bore so much charity to mankind, and
treachery to his own kingdom, as to instruct him in the
cleansing of his soul: whereby those strongholds of Satan are
undermined, which cannot subsist but on a stiff and deep clay
foundation. From these beginnings of Socrates, the moral-
ists ever since have toiled hard at this task, to get the soul
ἐκ γενέσεως, as Jamblichus! phrases it, out of that corruption
of its birth, that impurity born with it, which the soul con-
tracts by its conversation with the body, and from which, they
say, only philosophy can purge it. For it is Philoponus’s™
observation, that that canon of the physicians, “ that the incli-
nations of the soul necessarily follow the temper of the body,”
is by all men set down with that exception implied, “ unless
the man have studied philosophy,” for that study can reform
the other, καὶ μὴ ἕπεσθαι ποιεῖν, “make the soul contemn
the commands,” and arm it against the influences and poisons
and infections of the body. In sum, the main of philosophy
was to this purpose, to take off the soul from those corporeal
dependencies, and so in a manner restore it to its primitive
self; that is, to some of that divine perfection with which it
was infused, for then is the soul to be beheld in its native
shape, when it is stripped of all its passions. At other times
you do not see the soul, but some froth and weeds of it; as
the gray part of the sea is not to be called sea, ἀλλὰ τὰ
φυκία ἃ περιβέβληται, “some scurf and foam and weeds
that lie on the top of it.” So then to this spiritualizing of
the soul, and recovering it to the simplicity of its essence,
their main precepts were to quell and suppress τὸν ἐν ψυχῆ
k [S. Augustin., De Civit. Dei, lib. m [ Philoponus, Comment. in Aristot.
Viii. c. 3.] De Anima, on the words, ἔοικε δὲ τὰ τῆς
1 [Jambl. Protrept., c. iii. ] ψυχῆς πάθη.---1)6 A., lib. i. c. 1.)
Gg2
4.52 SERMON XXI.
δῆμον, as Maximus Tyrius" speaks, that turbulent, prachant,
“common people of the soul,” all the irrational affections, and
reduce it εἰς πολιτείαν, “into a monarchy or regal govern-
ment,” where reason might rule lord and king. For when-
soever any lower affection is suffered to do any thing there,
saith Philoponus®, “we do not work like men but some other
creatures.” Whosoever suffers their lower nutritive faculties
to act freely, οὗτοι κινδυνεύουσιν ἀποδενδρωθῆναι, “these
men are in danger to become trees :” that is, by these opera-
tions they differ nothing from mere plants. So those that
suffer their sensitive appetites, lust and rage, to exercise at
freedom, are not to be reckoned men, but beasts; τότε μόνον
ὡς ἄνθρωποι, x.T.X., “then only will our actions argue us men,
when our reason is at the forge.” ‘This was the aim and busi-
ness of philosophy, to keep us from unmanning ourselves, to
restore reason to its sceptre, to rescue it from the tyranny of
that most atheistical usurper, as Jamblichus calls the affec-
tions; and from hence he which lived according to those pre-
cepts of philesophy was said both by them and Clement, and
the fathers, κατὰ νοῦν ζῆν, and in Austin, secundum intellectum
vivere, to live according to the guidance of the reasonable
soul. Which whosoever did, saith Plotinus, though by it in
respect of divinity he was not perfect, yet at last should be
sure to find a gracious providence, first to perfect, then to
crown his natural moderate well-tempered endeavour, as
Austin cites it out of him?. This whole course and pro-
ceedings and assent of the soul, through these philosophical
preparations to spiritual perfection, is summarily and clearly
set down for us in Photius out of Isidorus’, philosophi-
cally observed to consist in three steps, τὰ μὲν πρῶτα,
«.7T.r. The first business of the soul is to call in those parts
of it which were engaged in any foreign fieshly employ-
® Maximus Tyr. supr. p. 278.
o [Plotinus, quoted by Philoponus,
Comment. in Aristot. de Anima, f. 4.
ed. Aldus. ]
p [S. August. De Civit. Dei, lib. x.
c. 29, addressing Porphyry: Uteris
etiam hoc verbo apertius, ubi Platonis
sententiam sequens, nec ipse dubitas,
in hae vita hominem nullo modo ad
perfectionem sapientiz pervenire, se-
cundum intellectum tamen viventibus
omne quod deest, providentia Dei et gra-
tid, post hane vitam posse compleri. ]
4 [αὐτὴν δὲ τὴν ψυχὴν ἐν ταῖς ἱεραῖς
εὐχαῖς πρὸς ὅλον τὸ θεῖον πέλαγος εἶναι,
τὰ μὲν πρῶτα συναγειρομένην ἀπὸ τοῦ
σώματος εἰς ἑαυτὴν, αὖθις δὲ ἐξισταμένην
τῶν ἰδίων ἠθῶν, καὶ ἀναχωροῦσαν ἀπὸ
τῶν λογικῶν ἐννοιῶν ἐπὶ τὰς τῷ νῷ συγ-
γενεῖς, ἐκ δ᾽ αὖ τρίτων ἐνθουσιῶσαν καὶ
παραλλάττουσαν εἰς ἀήθη τινὰ γαλήνην
θεοπρεπῆ καὶ οὐκ avOpwriyny.—s. Isi-
dorus Pel. ap. Phot. Biblioth., p. 350.
Bekker. |
SERMON XXI. 453
ment, and retire and collect itself unto itself: and then
secondly, it learns to quit itself, to put off the whole natural
man, ἴδια ἤθη, “its own fashions” and conceits: all the
notions, all the pride of human reason, and set itself on those
things which are nearest kin to the soul, that is, spiritual
affairs; and then thirdly, ἐνθουσιᾷ καὶ παραλλάττει, it falls
“into holy enthusiasms and spiritual elevations,” which it
continues, till it be changed and led into the calm and
serenity above the state of man, agreeable to the tranquillity
and peace which the gods enjoy. And could the philosophers
be their own scholars, could they exhibit that felicity which
they describe and fancy, they might glory in their morality,
and indeed be said to have prepared and purged the soul for
the receipt of the most pure and spiritual guest. But cer-
tainly their speculation outran their practice; and their
very morality was but theorical, to be read in their books
and wishes far more legible than in their lives and their
enjoyments. Yet some degrees also of purity, or at least a
less measure of impurity they attained to, only upon the
expectation and desire of happiness proposed to them upon
condition of performance of moral precepts; for all things
being indifferently moved to the obtaining of their swmmum
bonum ; all, I say, not only rational agents, ἀλλὰ καὶ φύσει
κινούμενα ἀλόγως, as Andronicus saith on the Ethics’, “ which
have nothing but nature to incite them to it;” the natural
man may, upon a sight and liking of an happiness proposed
on severe conditions, call himself into some degrees of moral
temper, as best suiting to the performance of the means
and obtaining of the end he looks for; and by this temper
be said to be morally better than another, who hath not
taken this course to subdue his passions. And this was
evident enough among the philosophers, who were as far
beyond the ordinary sort in severity of conversation, as depth
of learning: and read them as profitable precepts in the
example of their lives, as ever the schools breathed forth in
their lectures. Their profession was incompatible with many
vices, and would not suffer them to be so rich in variety of
sins as the vulgar; and then whatsoever they thus did, an
unregenerate Christian may surely perform in a far higher
τ [Andronicus in his Paraphrase of the Nic. Ethies ad init. }
454 SERMON XXI.
measure, as having more choice of ordinary restrainment
from sin than ever had any heathen: for it will be much to
our purpose to take notice of those ordinary restraints by
which unregenerate men may be, and are curbed, and kept
back from sinning; and these, saith Austin, God affords to
the very reprobates, non continens in ira suas misericordias.
Much to this same purpose hath holy Maximus® in those
admirable sections, epi ayamns, where most of the restraints
he speaks of are competible to the unregenerate, φόβος av-
θρώπων, κιτιλ. 1. Fear of men. 2. Denunciation of judg-
ments from heaven. 3. Temperance and moral virtues: nay,
sometimes other moral vices, as κενοδοξία, “ vain-glory” or
ostentation of integrity. 4. Natural impressions to do to
others as we would be done to. 5. Clearness of judgment
in discerning good from evil. 6. An expectation of a reward
for any thing well done; lastly, some gripes and twinges
of the conscience: to all add a tender disposition; a good
Christian education; common custom of the country where
one lives, where some vices are out of fashion; nay at last the
word of God daily preached; not a love, but servile fear of
it. These, I say, and the like may outwardly restrain un-
regenerate men from riots; may curb and keep them in, and
consequently preserve the soul from that weight of the mul-
titude of sins which press down other men to a desperation
of mercy. Thus is one unregenerate man less engaged in sin
than another, and consequently his soul less polluted; and
so in all likelihood more capable of the ordinary means of
salvation, than the more stubborn habituate sinner; when
every aversion, every commission of every sin doth more
harden against grace, more alien and set at a greater distance
from heaven: and this briefly we call a moral preparation of
the soul; and a purging of it, though not absolutely from
sin, yet from some measure of reigning sin, and disposing of
it to a spiritual estate: and this is no more than I learn from
Bradwardine in his lib. i. de causa Dei, ch. 37*. A servile fear,
a sight of some inconvenience, and moral habit of virtue, and
the like, multum retrahunt a peccato, inclinant ad opera bona,
et sic ad charitatem, et gratiam, et opera vere grata preparant
s [S. Maximus, Centena Capita de τ [Bradwardine, De Causa Dei, lib.
Caritate, 11 §§ 23, 32.] i. δ. 37. ad fin. ]
SERMON XXI. 4:55
et disponunt. And so I come to my last part, to shew of
what use this preparation of the soul is, in order to Christ’s
birth in us, “ The ways of the Lord.”
I take no great joy in presenting controversies to your ears
out of this place ; yet seeing I am already fallen upon a piece
of one, I must now go through it; and to quit it as soon as
I can, present the whole business unto you in some few pro-
positions, of which some I shall only recite as conceiving
them evident enough by their own light: the rest I shall a
little insist on, and then apply and drive home the profit of
all to your affections. And in this pardon me, for certainly
I should never have meddled with it, had not I resolved it
a theory that most nearly concerned your practice, and a
speculation that would instruct your wills as well as your
understandings. The propositions which contain the sum of
the business are these.
1. No preparation in the world can deserve or challenge
God’s sanctifying grace: “the Spirit bloweth where it list-
eth,” and cannot by any thing in us be predetermined to its
object or its work.
2. The Spirit is of power to work the conversion of any,
the greatest, sinner; at one minute to strike the most obdu-
rate heart and soften it, and out of the unnatural womb of
stones, infinitely more unfruitful than barrenness and age
had made the womb of Sarah, “to raise up children unto
Abraham.” According to the ὑπόθεσις of Aristotle, νόσους
ὑγιάζουσι πολλάκις ὅταν πολὺ ExoTH TLS", “ diseases are some-
times cured when the patient is at the extremity or height of
danger,” in an ecstasy and almost quite gone.
3. It is an ill consequence, that because God can and some-
times doth call unprepared sinners, therefore it is probable
He will deal so with thee in particular, or with unprepared
men in general. God doth not work in conversion as a
physical agent, to the extent of His power, but according to
the sweet disposition and counsel of His will.
4. In unprepared hearts there be many professed enemies to
grace, ill dispositions, ambition, atheism, pride of spirit, and,
in chief, an habit in a voluptuous settled course of sinning,
an indefatigable resolute walking after their own lusts. And
“ Problem. 1. ὃ 2.
Mat. xv.
26.
Mat. xiii.
qe
John iii.
20.
Mat. xiii.
58.
1 Cor.
xiv. 22.
456 SERMON XXI.
therefore there is very little hope that Christ will ever vouch-
safe to be born in such polluted hardened souls. For it is
Basil’s’ observation that that speech of the fool’s heart, “ There
is no God,” was the cause that the Gentiles were given over
to a reprobate sense, and fell headlong εἰς πάντα βδελύγματα,
“into all manner of abominations.” Hence it is that Jobius
in Photius* observes that in Scripture some are called “ dogs,”
some “unworthy to receive the mysteries of the kingdom of
heaven,” that some “hated the light” and came not to it, as
if all those had taken a course to make themselves uncapable
of mercy, and by a perfect hostility frighted Christ out of
their coasts. In the liberal dispensation of miracles in the
Gospel you would wonder to see Christ a niggard in His own
country, yet so, in respect of other places, He was, and “ did
not many miracles there, because of their unbelief,” not that
their incredulity had manacled Him, had shortened His hand,
or straitened His power, but that miracles, which when they
met with a passive willingness, a contentedness in the patient
to receive and believe them, were then the ordinary instru-
ments of faith and conversion, would have been but cast away
upon obdurate hearts; so that for Christ to have numbered
miracles among His unbelieving countrymen no way prepared
to receive them, had been an injurious liberality, and added
only to their unexcusableness; which contradicts not the
axiom of St. Paul, “ that some signs are only for unbelievers :”
for even those unbelievers must have within them τὸ ἐπιτή-
deLov τῆς ὑπακοῆς, “a proneness or readiness to receive them
with belief,” καὶ εἰφοικίζεσθαι, x.7.rX. in Jobius’, to “ open to
the spirit knocking” by those miracles, and improve them to
their best profit.
5. Though God needs not, yet He requires moral prepara-
tion of us, as an ordinary means to make us more capable of
grace: for although according to St. Austin, Ne ipsa quidem
justitia nostra indiget Deus: yet according to Salvian’s” limi-
v [S. Basil. Proceem. de Judicio Dei.
Op., tom. ii. p. 215, A, B.]
x [Jobius ap. Photium in Biblioth.,
p- 627. ed. Hoeschel. |
y [ἐκείνοις μέντοι ταῦτα προβάλ-
λεσθαι, οἵ τὸ ἐπιτήδειον τῆς ὑπακοῆς
ἀντιπαρέχονται καὶ τὴν ἀπ᾿ αὐτῶν ὠφέ-
λειαν eisoixifovrat’ ὅσους δὲ τῶν ἀπί-
στων ἑκουσίως πρὸς τὰ τῶν ἔργων ὕπερ-
φυῆ τυφλώττοντας ἐπιστάμεθα, τούτοις
ἡἣ τῶν σημείων προβολὴ ἀπρονόητόν τε
καὶ μάταιον. ---ΦοὈϊιι5 ap. Phot. Biblioth.,
p- 202. Bekker. ]
z [Sed Deus, inquis, non eget retribu-
tione? Nihil minus quam ut non egeat.
Non eget enim juxta potentiam suam,
SERMON XXI. 457
tation, Hyget juxta preceptionem suam, licet non juxta poten-
tiam: eget secundum legem suam, non eget secundum majes-
tatem. We are to think that God hath use of any thing
which He commands, and therefore must perform whatever
He requires, and not dare to be confident of the end, without
the observation of the means prescribed. It is too much bold-
ness, if not presumption, to leave all to His omnipotent work-
ing, when He hath prescribed us means to do somewhat our-
selves.
6. Integrity and honesty of heart, a sober moral life, and Vid. Wisd.
chiefly humility and tenderness of spirit; in sum, whatever ae
degree of innocence, either study, or fear, or love, or natural
disposition can work in us, some or all of which may in some
measure be found in some men not yet regenerate, are good
preparations for Christ’s birth in us ; so saith Clement? of phi-
losophy, that it doth προπαρασκευάζειν, x.7.r., “make ready
and prepare the way against Christ’s coming,” co-
operate” with other helps that God hath given us; all with
this caution, that it doth only prepare, not perfect ; facilitate
the pursuit of wisdom to us, ov μέντοι ἀθηράτου οὔσης δίχα
αὐτῆς, “which God may bestow on us without this means.”
To this purpose hath Basil® a notable homily to exhort scholars
to the study of foreign, human, especially Grecian learning,
and to this end saith he, “that we prepare ourselves, εἰς τὰ
ἄνω, to the heavenly spiritual philosophy.” In the like kind
the fathers prescribe good works of charity, observing out of
the nineteenth of St. Matthew, that the distribution of all " ἐν xix.
their substance to the poor was a pre/udium in the primitive ae
believers to the following of Christ, Prius vendant omnia quam
sequantur : from whence he calls alms-deeds, exordia quasi et
incunabula conversionis nostre. The like may be said, though
not in the same degree, of all other courses, quibus carnalium
sarcinarum impedimenta projicimus: for if these foremen-
tioned preparations be mere works of nature in us, as some
συνεργεῖν, “
sed eget juxta preceptionem suam,
non eget secundum majestatem suam,
sed eget secundum legem suam; et in
se ipso quidem non eget, sed in multis
eget: non guerit in se munificen-
tiam, sed in suis querit; et ideo non
eget quidem juxta omnipotentiam, sed
eget juxta misericordiam; non eget
Deitate pro semetipso, sed eget pietate
pro nobis.—Salvian. ady. Avaritiam,
lib. iv. § 140.]
4 Clement. Alex. Strom., lib. i. ¢. 5;
and ο. vi. § 365. PP 331. ad fin.—337.
» [S. Basil. Serm. de legend. libris
Gentilium. on , tom. ii. Ὁ. 173.]
Acts x. 2.
Mat. i. 19.
458 SERMON XXI.
would have them, then do they naturally incline the subject
for the receiving of grace when it comes, and by fitting, as
it were, and organizing the subject, facilitate its entrance ; or
if they be works of God’s restraining preventing grace, as it is -
most orthodoxly agreed on, then are they good harbingers for
the sanctifying Spirit ; good comfortable symptoms that God
will perfect and crown the work which He hath begun in us.
7. God’s ordinary course, as far as by events we can judge
of it, is to call and save such as are thus prepared. Thus to
instance in a few of the first and chiefest. It was appointed
by God that she only should be vouchsafed the blessed office
of dignity of being the θεοτόκος, “Christ’s Mother,’ who was
πασῶν πάσαις ἀρεταῖς ὑπερανελθοῦσα, saith he in Photius®,
“fuller of virtues than any else of her sex could brag of.” In
hike manner, that the rest of the family, Christ’s father and
brethren, in account, on earth, should be such whose virtues
had bestowed a more eminent opinion, though not place upon
them amongst men; so was Joseph and his sons δικαιοσύνῃ
διαλάμποντες, “ famous for very just men,” James the brother
of the Lord ἐκ κοιλίας ἅγιος, “holy from the womb,” (as
Eusebius cites it*,) called by the Jews ὀβλίας, saith he out of
Hegesippus, which he interprets περιοχὴ τοῦ λαοῦ; καὶ δικαιο-
σύνη", “the stay of the people and justice itself.” In brief;
if a Cornelius be to be called from Gentilism to Christianity,
ye shall find him in the beginning of his character, “to be a
devout man and one that feared God with all his house, gave
much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway : one
cut out as it were εἰς ἀπαρχὴν ἔθνων, “to be the first-fruit
of the Gentiles.” Now though none of these virtues can be
imputed to nature in the substance of them, but acknowledge
a more supernatural spiritual agent in them, yet are they to
be reckoned as preparations to Christ’s birth in them, because
they did precede it: for so in respect of His real incarnation
in the world, the type of His spiritual in the soul, Mary was
a virtuous pure virgin before the Holy Ghost overshadowed
her, Joseph a just man before the Holy Ghost appeared to
him, James holy from the womb, and Cornelius capable of all
« [ἔδει μητέρα Θεοῦ ἐπὶ γῆς γένεσθαι': Biblioth., p. 641. (ed. Hoeschel.) ]
τῆν πασῶν πάσαις ἀρεταῖς ὑπερανελθοῦ- 4 [Euseb. Eccles. Hist. ii. 23. |
σαν exadecev.i—Jobius ap. Photium * Photius, ibid.
SERMON XXI. 459
that commendation for devotion and alms-deeds, Acts x. 2, Acts x. 2.
before either Christ was preached to him in the thirty-seventh ver. 37.
or the Holy Ghost fell on him in the forty-fourth verse. ver. 44,
8. The conversion of unprepared, hardened, blasphemous
sinners, is to be accounted as a most rare and extraordinary
work of God’s power and mercy, not an every day’s work,
like to be bestowed on every habituate sinner; and there-
fore it is commonly accompanied with some evident note
of difference to point it out for a miracle. Thus was Paul
called from “the chief of sinners” to the chief of saints, but 1 Tim. i.
with this mark, that “Christ Jesus might shew forth all long- !® {10:1
suffering,” &c., which was “in him first,” and perhaps last,
in that degree ; that others in his pitch of blasphemies might
not presume of the like miracle of mercy. And, indeed, he
that is thus called must expect what Paul found, a mighty
tempest throughout him, three days at least without sight or
nourishment, if not a παράλυσις or λυιποψυχία, “a swoon,
a kind of ecstasy” of the whole man, at this tumultuary
driving out of this high, rank, insolent, habituate body of
sin. It is observed, that when the news of Christ’s birth
was brought by the “wise men,” the city was straight in an
uproar; “ Herod was much troubled, and all Jerusalem with Mat. ii. 3.
him,” for it seems they expected no such matter, and therefore
so strange and sudden news produced nothing but astonish-
ment and tumult ; whilst Simeon, “ who waited for the con- rLuke ii.
solation of Israel,” makes no such strange business of it ; 2%]
takes Him presently into his embraces, and familiarly hugs
Him in his arms, having been before acquainted with Him
by his faith. Thus will it, at Christ’s spiritual ἐνσάρκωσι;
be in an unprepared heart, His reigning Herod sins, and all
the Jerusalem and democracy of affections, a strang> tumult
of repining, old habituate passions will struggle fiercely, and
shake the whole house before they leave it. If a strong man
be to be dispossessed of house or abode, without warning, a
hundred to one he will do some mischief at his departure,
and draw at least some pillar after him: when as a prepared
Simeon’s soul lays hold as soon as he hears of Him, is already
organized, as it were, for the purpose, holds out the arms and
bosom of faith, and at the first minute of His appearance
takes Him into his spiritual embraces. This very prepara-
4.60 SERMON XXI.
tion either had denied the strong man entrance, or else binds
his hands, manacles that blind Samson, and turns him out
in peace, and then the Spirit enters into that soul—which
itself or its harbingers have prepared—in a soft still wind, in
a still voice, and the soul shall feel its gale, shall hear its
whispering, and shall scarce discern, perhaps not at all ob-
serve, the moment of its entrance.
Lastly, by way of corollary to all that hath been said,
though God can, and sometimes doth, call blasphemous sin-
ners ; though nothing in us can facilitate God’s action to Him;
though none of our performances or His lower works in us,
can merit or challenge His sanctifying grace; though, in
brief, all that we can do is in some respect enmity to grace ;
yet certainly there is far more hope of the just, careful,
moral man, which hath used all those restraints which are
given him, that he shall be called and saved ; of such a one
we are to judge far more comfortably, and expect more con-
fidently, than of another more habituate sinner, negligent
of the commands of either God or nature. And this I con-
ceive I have in some measure proved through each part of
the former discourse, and so I should dismiss it and come
to application, but that I am stayed and thwarted by a
contrary proposition maintained by a sort of our popular
preachers, with more violence than discretion, which I con-
ceive to be of dangerous consequence, and therefore worth
opening to you. In setting down the pitch that an unre-
generate man may attain to, and yet be damned, some of
our preaching writers are wont duly to conclude with this
peremptory doctrine, that of a mere moral man, though never
so severe a censor of his own ways, never so rigid an exactor
of all the precepts of nature and morality in himself; yet of
this man there is less hope, either that he shall be converted
or saved, than the most debauched ruffian under heaven.
The charity and purity of this doctrine you shall judge of, if
you will accompany me awhile, and first observe that they
go so far with the mere moral man, and drive him so high,
that at his depression again, many a regenerate man falls
with him under that title; and in issue, I fear, all will prove
mere moralists in their doom, which do fall short of that de-
gree of zeal, which their either faction or violent heats pre-
SERMON XXI. 461
tend to; and so as Tertullian‘ objects to the heathen, ex-
postulating with them why they did not deify Themistocles
and Cato as well as Jove and Hereules, Quot potiores viros
apud inferos reliquistis ὃ They leave many an honester man
in hell, than some of those whom their favour or faction hath
besainted.
Secondly, observe to what end or use this doctrine may
serve, but as an allay to civil honesty in a commonwealth,
and fair, just dealing, which, forsooth, of late is grown so
luxuriant, the world is like to languish and sink, it is so
overburdened with it: and on the other side an encourage-
ment to the sinner in his course, an engagement in the pur-
suit of vice to the height and ἀκμὴ, as the pitch and cue
which God expects and waits for; as they conclude on these
grounds, because He looked upon Peter not till the third
denial, and then called Paul when he was most mad against
the Christians : as if the-nearest way to heaven were by hell-
gates, and devils most likely to become saints; as if there
were merit in abominations, and none in the right way to
Christianity, but whom atheism would be ashamed of ; as if,
because “the natural man understands not,” &c., all relics [1 Cor. ii.
of natural purity were solemnly and pro forma to be aban- !*]
doned to make us capable of spiritual. It is confessed that
some have been and are thus converted, and by an ecstasy of
the spirit snatched and caught lke firebrands out of the
fire; and though some must needs find their spiritual joys
_ infinitely increased, ἐκ παραλλήλου, by that gall of bitter-
ness, from which they were delivered, and are therefore more
abundantly engaged to God, as being not the objects only,
_ but the miracle of His mercy: but yet for all this shall one
or two variations from the ordinary course, from the ὡς ἐπὶ
τὸ πολὺ, be turned into a ruled case? Shall the rarer ex-
amples of Mary Magdalen or a Saul prescribe and set up?
Shall we sin to the purpose, as if we meant to threaten God
that it were His best and safest course to call us? Shall we
abound in rebellions, that grace may superabound? God [Rom. νι.
pardon and forbid. 1:
Thirdly, consider the reason of their proposition, and you
shall judge of the truth of it, and besides their own fancies
f [Tertull. Apol. § 11.]
Rom. xii.
3.
462 SERMON XXI.
and resolution to maintain them, they have none but this,
“the mere moral man trusts in his own righteousness, and
this confidence in the arm of flesh is the greatest enemy to
sanctifying grace, which works by spiritual humihty.” To
which we answer distinctly, that the foresaid pride, trust or
confidence, is neither effect nor necessary adjunct of moral-
ity, but an absolute defection from the rules thereof; and
therefore whatsoever proceeds either as an effect, or conse-
quent from pride or confidence, cannot yet be imputed to
morality at all, or to the moral men per se, no more than the
thundering or lightning is to be imputed to my walking,
because it thunders whilst I walk ; or preaching to my stand-
ing still, because whilst I stand still I preach; οὐ yap διὰ τὸ
βαδίζειν ἤστραψεν, ἀλλὰ συνέβη τοῦτο; saith Aristotle in the
first Post. c. 48, “It doth not lighten because I walk, but
that is an accident proceeding from some other cause.” ΤῸ
strive against the motions of the Spirit, and so to render
conversion more difficult, is an effect perhaps of pride or
trust, but yet is not to be imputed to morality, though the
moral man be proud or self-trusting, because this pride or
self-trusting is not an effect, but an accident of morality ;
and therefore their judgment should be able to distinguish
and direct their zeal against the accidental vice, not the
essential innocent virtue, against pride, not morality. Be-
sides, this pride is also as incident to him who is morally evil;
nay, either supposes or makes its subject so, being formally
a breach of morality. For that σωφροσύνη belonging to the
understanding, which is, “not to think more highly” on
one’s own worth than he ought, ἀλλὰ φρονεῖν εἰς τὸ σω-
φρονεῖν, do we not find it commended and dilated on by
Aristotle", μειζόνων ἢ ἄξιος, x. τ. λ., “ not to overprize his
own worth,” or to expect an higher reward than it in pro-
portion deserves? So that he that trusts in his morality for
heaven, doth eo nomine offend against morality, according to
that of Salvian, hoc ipsum genus maxime injustitie est, si quis’
se justum presumat ; and indeed Aristotle and Seneca could
say as much: and so then the accusation is unjust and con-
tumelious ; for to a moral man if he be truly so, this pride
or confidence is incompatible: for do we not find that
ὁ [Aristot. Post. Anal., lib. i. c. 4.] h (Arist. Nic. Eth., lib. iv. e. 7.]
SERMON XXI. 4.63
treble humility, ταπεινοφροσύνη, of the heart, πραότης, of
the tongue, μακροθυμία, of the actions, handled also and Eph. iv. 2.
prescribed by the philosophers? In sum, that which in all
moral precepts comes nearest pride or highmindedness, is
that μεγαλοψυχία, part of which is “setting value on one’s-
self.” But if you observe, this goes no further than τὰ ἔξω
ἀγαθὰ, “honour or worldly pomp:” as for the immortal
blessedness of the soul, it was a thing infinitely above the
pitch of their hope or confidence: the most perfect among
them never pretended any jus meriti to it, and if they did,
they had by so much the less hopes to attain to it. Now if
it be supposed, as I fear is too true, that our moral men fall
far short of the ancient philosophers, if they be now-a-days
confident and trust in their works for salvation, then they do
not make good their name; they are only so ὁμονύμως and
καταχρηστικῶς, “ abusively and notionally.” And yet even
these equivocal moral men seem to me in as good, if not better
case, than the other term of comparison, the careless negli-
gent debauched men. For upon their grounds is it not as
easy for the converting spirit to enter and subdue one Luci-
fer, one proud devil in the heart, otherwise pretty well quali-
fied, as to deal with a whole legion of blasphemous, violent,
riotous, railing, ignorant devils? I-have done all with the
confutation of this loose groundless opinion, which if it were
true, would yet prove of dangerous consequence to be
preached, in abating and turning our edge, which is of
itself blunt and dull enough toward goodness : nay, certainly
it hath proved scandalous to those without ; as may appear
by that boast and exultancy of Campian' in his eighth rea-
son, where he upbraids us Englishmen of our abominable
Lutheran, licentious doctrine,—as he calls it,—quanto scele-
ratior es, tanto vicinior gratie: and therefore I do not repent
that I have been somewhat large in the refuting of it; as
also because it doth much import to the clearing of my dis-
course ; for if the mere moral men be furthest from heaven,
then have I all this while busied myself, and tormented you
with an unprofitable, nay, injurious preparation, whereas I
should have prescribed you a shorter easier call, by being ex-
i Campian. [Rationes decem ob- Academicis Anglis.:—Rat. viii. ad fin.
lati certaminis in causa fidei reddite apud Whitakeri Responsionem. |
464 SERMON XXI.
tremely sinful, according to these two aphorisms of Hippo-
crates*, ai ἐπ᾽ ἄκρον, x.T.r., “The strongest bodies are in
greatest danger,” and εἰς τὰ ἔσχατα, the ἀκμὴ and “ height
of a disease is the fittest opportunity for a miraculous cure.”
But beloved, let us more considerately bethink ourselves,
let us study and learn and walk a more secure probable way
to heaven; and for those of us which are yet unregenerate,
though we obtained no grace of God but that of nature and
reason, and our Christianity to govern us, yet let us not con-
temn those ordinary restraints which these will afford us: let
us attend in patience, sobriety, and humility and prayers,
the good time and leisures of the spirit; let us not make
our reasonable soul, our profession of men, of Christians,
ashamed of us; let not the heathen and beasts have cause
to blush at us; let us remain men till it may please Him to
call us into saints, lest being plunged in habitual confident
sinning, that hell and Tophet on earth, the very omnipotent
mercy of God be in a manner foiled to hale us out again;
let us improve, rack, and stretch our natural abilities to the
highest ; that although, according to our thirteenth article, “we
cannot please God,” yet we may not mightily provoke Him.
Let every man be in some proportion to his gifts, Christ’s
Baptist and forerunner and harbinger in himself, that when-
soever He shall appear or knock, He may enter, lodge, and
dwell without resistance. Lastly, after all thy preparations,
be not secure; if the Bridegroom will not vouchsafe to rest
with you, all your provision is in vain; all the morality, and
learning, and gifts, and common graces, unless Christ at last
be born in us, are but embryos, nay abortives, rude, imper-
fect, horrid, νήπιοι καί εἰσιν οἱ φιλόσοφοι, “ that philosopher
dies in his nonage in whom Christ was never born.” The
highest reach of years and learning is but mfancy with-
out the virility and manhood of the spirit, by which we are
made perfect men in Christ Jesus. Wherefore above all
things in the world let us labour for this perfection; let us
melt and dissolve every faculty and spirit about us in pur-
suit of it, and at last seal, and bless, and crown our endea-
vours with our prayers; and with all the rhetoric, and means,
k [ Aphorismi, tom. iii. pp. 706, 708. Medici Greci, tom. xxiii. ed. Kiihn.]
SERMON XXI. 465
and humility, and violence of our souls, importune and lay
hold on the sanctifying Spirit, and never leave till He hath
blessed and breathed on us. O Thou mighty, controlling,
holy, hallowing Ghost, be pleased with Thine effectual work-
ing to suppress in us all resistance of the pride of nature,
and prepare us for Thy kingdom of grace here, and glory
hereafter.
Now to Him which hath elected us, hath created and re-
deemed us, &c.
HAMMOND, Hh
SERMON XXII.
JOHN vil. 48.
Have any of the Pharisees believed on Him ?
Ir is observable from history with what difficulty religion
attempts to propagate and establish itself with the many ;
what countenance and encouragement it hath required from
those things which are most specious and pompous in the
world; how it hath been fain to keep its dependencies and
correspondencies, and submit to the poor condition of sus-
taining itself by those beggarly helps which the world and
the flesh will afford it. Two main pillars which it relies on
are power and learning, the camp and the schools, or in a
word, authority of great ones and countenance of scholars;
the one to force and extort obedience, the other to msinuate
belief and assent; the first to ravish, the second to persuade.
One instance for all: if we would plant Christianity in
Turkey, we must first invade and conquer them, and then
convince them of their follies; which about an hundred
years ago Cleonard proposed to most courts of Christendom,
(and to that end himself studied Arabic,) that princes would
join their strength, and scholars their brains, and all surprise
them in their own land and language, at once besiege the
Turk and his Alcoran, put him to the sword, and his religion
to the touchstone; command him to Christianity with an
high hand, and then to shew him the reasonableness of our
commands. Thus also may we complain, but not wonder
that the Reformation gets ground so slow in Christendom,
because the forces and potent abettors of the papacy secure
SERMON XXII. 407
them from being led captive to Christ; as long as the pope
is riveted so fast in his chair, and as long as the rulers take
part with him, there shall be no doubt of the truth of their
religion; unless it please God to back our arguments with
steel, and to raise up kings and emperors to be our cham-
pions, we may question, but never confute his supremacy.
Let us come with all the power and rhetoric of Paul and
Barnabas, all the demonstrations of reason and Spirit, yet as
long as they have such topics against us, as the authority of
the rulers and Pharisees, we may dispute out our hearts, and
preach out our lungs, and gain no proselytes; all that we
shall get is but a scoff and a curse, a sarcasm and an ana-
thema, in the words next after my text, ‘This people which
know not the law are cursed,” there is no heed to be taken
to such poor contemptible fellows. To bring all home to the
business of the text, let Christ come with all the enforce-
ment and violence and conviction of His Spirit, sublimity of
His speech and miracles, all the power of rhetoric and rheto-
ric of His power, so that all that see or hear, bear witness
that never man spake as this Man, yet all this shall be
accounted but a delusion, but an enchantment of some
seduced wretches, unless the great men or deep scholars will
be pleased to countenance them. And it is much to be
feared they are otherwise possessed, and rather than this
shall not be followed, Christ shall be left alone; rather than
they shall speak in vain, the Word itself shall be put to
silence: and if they which were appointed to take and bring
Him to judgment shall be caught by Him they came to
apprehend, and turn their accusations into reverence, the
Pharisees will not be without their reply, they are doctors in
the law, and therefore for a need can be their own advo-
cates: then answered the Pharisees, “ Are ye also deceived,
have any of the rulers and Pharisees believed on Him?”
Concerning the infidelity of the rulers in my text, as being
not so directly appliable to my audience, I shall forbear to
speak. My discourse shall retire itself to the Pharisee, as
being a professor of learning, brought up at the university in
Jerusalem, and God grant his vices and infidelity be not
also academical.
The words we shall divide not into several parts, but con-
Hh 2
ver, 49.
468 SERMON XXII.
siderations, and read them either as spoken by the Pharisee,
or recorded by the Evangelist. In the first we have the τὸ
λογικὸν, the rational force of them, as they are part of an
argument, that they which believed in Christ were deceived,
sub hac forma ;—he that would judge of the truth of his life,
is to look which way the greatest scholars are affected, and
then, though in that case it concluded fallaciously, yet the
argument was probable, and the point worth our discussion ;
that the judgment of learning and learned men is much to
be heeded in matters of religion.
In the second we have the τὸ φυσικὸν and τὸ ῥῆμα, the
rational sense of the words being resolved, as affirmative in-
terrogations are wont, into a negative proposition, “ Have
any,” &c. The Pharisees did not believe on Him; 1. 6. the
greatest scholars are not always the best Christians. And
first of the first, the authority of learning and learned men
in matters of religion, noted from the logical force of the
words, “ Have any,” &c.
Amongst other acts of God’s providence and wise economy
of all things, there is not one more observable than the suc-
cession of His Church, and dispensation of His most precious
gifts attending it; you shall not in any age find the flourish-
ing of learning severed from the profession of religion; and
the proposition shall be granted without exception: God’s
people were always the learnedest part of the world. Before
the flood we are not so confident as to define and set down
the studies and proficiency in all kinds of knowledge amongst
those long-lived ancients; how far soever they went, belongs
little to us. The deluge made a great chasm betwixt us,
and it would be hard for the liveliest eyes to pierce at such
distance through so much water; let those who fancy the
two pillars?, in which all learning was engraven, the one of
brick, the other of marble, to prevent the malice either of
fire or water, please themselves with the fable, and seem to
have deduced all arts from Adam. Thus far it is agreed on,
that in those times every father bemg both a priest and a
king in his own family, bestowed on his son all knowledge both
secular and sacred, which himself had attained to: Adam by
tradition instructing Seth, and Seth Enoch, in all knowledge
4 [Josephus Antiq. Jud., lib, i, ο. 2, ὃ 3.]
SERMON XXII. 4.69
as well as righteousness. For it is Josephus’s® observation,
that whilst Cain and his progeny employed themselves about
wicked and illiberal inventions, grovelling upon the earth,
Seth and his bore up their thoughts as well as eyes towards
heaven, and observed the course and discipline of the
stars; wherein it was easy to be exquisite, every man’s age
shewing him the several conjunctions and oppositions and
other appearances of the luminaries, and so needing no
successors to perfect his observations. Hence Philo® calls
Abraham ἄνδρα μετεωρολογικὸν, and says his knowledge in
astronomy led him to the notice of a Deity, and that his
sublime speculation gave him the name of Abram, a high
exalted father, before his faith had given the better com-
pellation of Abraham, father of many nations: hence from
him, 1. Chaldea, 2. Egypt, 3. Greece, came all to the skill
they brag of; so that Proclus made a good conjecture, that
the wisdom of the Chaldeans was Θεόδοτος καὶ θεοπαράδο-
τος, “a gift of some of the gods,” it coming from Abraham,
| who was both a friend and in a manner an acquaintance of
| the true God, and far ancienter and wiser than any of their
false. In sum, all learning as well as religion was pure and
classical only among the Hebrews, as may appear by Moses
in his ἑξάμερον, the only true natural philosophy that ever
| came into the world; so that even Longinus‘, which took the
story of the creation to be a fable, yet commends Moses’
| expression of it, “ Let there be light, and there was light,” [Gen.i. 3.]
for a speech admirably suited to a god, for the greatest
ὕψος or sublimity that any rhetorician could strain for.
And Demetrius Phalereus* commends the Pentateuch to
Ptolemy, ws φιλοσοφωτέραν καὶ ἀκέραιον, K.7.r., “as the
most philosophical, accurate discourse he had ever heard of.”
And if by chance any scraps or shreds of knowledge were
ever scattered among the Gentiles, they certainly fell from
the Chaldeans’ table: from whence in time the poor beg-
garly world gathered such basketsful, that they began to
feed full, and be in good liking, and take upon them to be
richer than their benefactors, and Athens at last begins
b [Ibid., §§ 2, 3.] above, p. 300. ]
¢ [Philo Jud., De Abrahamo, p. 361, ὁ [Demetr. Phal. ap. Enseb. Pre-
"ἢ par. Evang., lib. viii. 3. p. 351, b.]
4 [Longinus, De Sublim., quoted
470 SERMON XXII.
to set up as the only university in the world. But it is
Austin’s observation‘, that it was in respect of Christ, and for
the propagation of the Church, that learning was ever suf-
fered to travel out of Jewry. Christ was to be preached
and received among the Gentiles, and therefore they must
be civilized beforehand, lest such holy things being cast
abruptly before swine, should only have been trampled on:
or as Moses’ books falling among the poets, have been only
distorted into fables, turned also into prodigies, metamor-
phoses, and mythical divinity. Cum enim prophete, &c.,
“under Abraham and Moses, whilst the learning and the
sermons of the prophets were for Israel’s use, the heathen
world was as ignorant as irreligious ;” but about Romulus’
time, when the prophecies of Christ, which belonged also to
the Gentiles, were no longer whispered, but proclaimed by
the mouth of Hosea, Amos, Isaiah, Micah, and Jonas from
the reign of Uzziah to Hezekiah, kings of Judah, then also
began learning to flourish abroad among the nations, to
dilate itself over the world: Greece began to hearken after
wisdom, and brag of its σοφοὶ, Thales and the like, wt fontes
divine et humane sapientie pariter erupisse videantur, that
then secular knowledge might dare to shed itself among the
nations, when Christ began to be revealed, the expectation
of the Geutiles. It were an infinite discourse to present
unto you the like proceedings through all ages, the continual
marriages, the combinations, and never any divorce betwixt
learning and religion. The fathers before mentioned are
large in drawing it down to our hands in tables of collateral
descent throughout all generations ; and I hope the present
state of the world will sufficiently avouch it. For what is all
the beggarly skill of the Arabians in physics and the mathe-
matics, all the cabalisms of the Jews; in sum, all the rather
folly than wisdom, that either Asia or Africa pretend to?
what hath all the world beside that dare look a Christian in
the face? I doubt not but this corner of Europe where we
live, may challenge and put to shame, nay upbraid the igno-
rance of the learnedest Mahometan, and be able to afford
some champions which shall grapple with the tallest giant,
with the proudest son of Anak that Italy can boast of. I will
‘ [S. Augustin. De Civit. Dei, lib, xviii. c, 27.]
SERMON XXII. 471
hope and pray, and again dare to hope, that as all Europe
hath not more moderation and purity of religion than this
kingdom, so it never had a more learned clergy; never more
encouragement for learning from religion; never more ad-
vantages to religion from learning. But all this while we
hover in the air, we keep upon the wing, and talk only, καθ-
ὄλου, at large and in thesi: we must descend lower to the
καθέκαστον and hypothesis here; where heed is to be taken
to the Pharisee, to the doctor, in my text. The disciples were
but fishermen and mechanics, illiterate enough, and yet a
word of theirs shall more sway mine assent, and rule my
faith, than the proudest dictates out of Moses’ chair. And
thus indeed are we now-a-days ready to repose as much trust
in the shop as in the schools, and rely more on the authority
of one lay-professor, than the sagest elders in theirs or our
Israel. Learning is accounted but an ostentatious comple-
ment of young scholars, that will never bring the pastor
or his flock the nearer to the way toward heaven. But to
recal our judgments to a milder temper, we are to learn from
Clemens®, that although the wisdom of God, and doctrine of
the gospel, be αὐτοτελὴς καὶ ἀπροσδεὴς, able to maintain,
and fence, and authorize itself, yet even philosophy and
secular learning is of use, nay necessity, to defeat the
treacheries, and sophisms, and stratagems of the adversary :
and although the truth of Scripture be the bread we live on,
the main staff and stay of our subsistence ; yet this exoterical
learning, τὰ θύραθεν μαθήματα, as Sophronius calls them,
this προπαίδεια of the schools, must be served in ὡς mapowy-
ματα Kal τραγήματα, as cates and dainties to make up the
banquet; nay they are not only for superfluity, but solid and
material uses. It was a custom of old, saith Dionysius Hali-
carnensis", to build cities, συνεχεῖς ἐπὶ τοῖς ὄρεσι, never
far from some hill, or mountain, that beside the natural
strength, the hold from the foundation, they may receive
some security and safeguard from so stout and tall a neigh-
bour: thus will it stand us upon, so to build our faith upon
a rock, that we may also have some shelter near us to fence
and fortify our fabric, when the wind or tempest shall arise.
® [Clemens Alexand. Strom., lib. i. cap. 20. § 100. p. 377.]
h [Dionys. Halicarn, Hist., lib. i. c. 9. }
4.72 SERMON XXII.
Had not Peter, indeed, and the rest at Christ’s call left their
ignorance with their nets and trades, had they not been
made scholars as well as disciples, all trades promiscuously
might justly have challenged and invaded the pulpit, and
no man denied to preach that was able to believe. But you
are to know that their calling was an inspiration, they were
furnished with gifts as well as graces; and whatever other
learning they wanted, sure I am they were the greatest lin-
guists in the world. Yea, the power and convincing force of
argument, which the heathen observed in Peter‘, made them
get the oracles to proclaim that he had learnt magic from his
Master. ΤῸ drive the whole business to an issue, in brief,
take it in some few propositions.
1. There is not so great a dependence betwixt learning
and religion in particular persons, as we have observed to
be in ages and countries: so that though plenty of knowledge
be a symptom or judiciary sign, that that Church where it
flourishes is the true Church of God, yet it is no necessary
argument, that that man where it in special resides, is the
sincerest Christian ; for upon these terms is the wisest man,
the scribe, the disputer of the world, the loudest braggers of
Jews or Grecians are found guilty of spiritual ignorance, as
the last part of our discourse shall make evident.
2. Matters of faith are not ultimo resolubilia in principia
rationis, therefore not to be resolved any further than the
Scriptures; they are not to beg authority from any other
science; for this is the true metaphysics, ἀρχικωτάτη Kat
ἡγεμονικωτάτη, the mistress and commandress of all other
knowledges, which must perpetually do their homage to it,
as servants always to attend and confirm its proposals, never
to contradict it, as Aristotle hath it/,
3. Though faith depend not upon reason, though it subsist
entirely upon its own bottom, and is then most purely faith
when it relies not on reason, and adheres wholly to the αὐτο-
πιστία of God’s word, yet doth the concurrence, and agree-
ment, and evidence of reason add much to the clearness, and
beauty, and splendour of it: takes away all fears and jealou-
5108, and suspicious surmisings out of the understanding, and
i [S. August. De Civit. Dei, lib. xviii. c. 53. ]
[ Aristot. Metaph. B. ¢. ii.]
SERMON XXII. 473
bestows a resolution and constancy on it. For faith, though
in respect of its ground, God’s word, it be most infallible, yet
in its own nature is, as the philosopher defines it, a kind of
opinion, and in our human frailty subject to demurs, and
doubts, and panic terrors, for fear it be false grounded, and
therefore Aristotle saith of it, that it differs from knowledge
ὡς νοσώδης ὑγιεινοῦ, “as a sickly man from a strong,” it is
very weak and aguish, subject to sweats and colds, and hourly
distempers: whereas the evidence and assurance of sense
and reason added to it, bestows a full health and strength
upon it, an ἀθλητικὴ ἕξις, a perfect state that it shall never
be forced or frighted out of. In brief, where reason gives
its suffrage, it unveils faith, and to adherence superadds
evidence, and teaches us to feel, and touch, and handle what
before we did believe; to gripe, and hold, and even possess
what before we apprehended: and these are believers in a
manner elevated above an earthly condition, initiated to the
state which is all vision, where every thing is beheld γυμνὸν (Heb. iv.
καὶ τετραχηλισμένον, “naked and displayed,” as the entrails 15]
of a creature cut down the back; or with “ open face, behold- 2 Cor. iii.
ing as in a glass.” 25:
4. There be some difficulties in religion at which an illite-
rate understanding will be struck in a maze; some depths of
mystery where an elephant can scarce tread water, a lamb
must not hope to wade; many above the apprehensions of
the most capacious brain, where reason being not able to ex-
press, must be content to shadow and describe in some rude
lines what it cannot perform in portraiture: and here, I say,
learning, though it cannot reach, yet can heave up and point
at; profit, though not perfect us; help us to some images and
resemblances, to conceive that which we cannot fully com-
prehend: so saith Philoponus*, will mathematical abstractions
facilitate the simplicity of God’s essence to our understand-
ings, the lucid nature of the sun express the brightness of his
glory, and the mysterious numbers of the Pythagoreans re-
present the Trinity to our fancies. And thus doth Zoroaster
in Patricius', philosophari de Deo, subdue, as it were, divinity
* [Philoponusin Aristot. De Anima, 1593. from Psellus’ Expositio Dogma-
f. 2. (Aldus.) ] tum que sunt apud Assyrios.
’ Patricius, [ Zoroaster, p. 6. Venice.
474 SERMON XXII.
to reason, and raise up reason to join issue with divinity, and
by his πατρικὸς βύθος ἐκ τρίων συγκείμενος τριάδων, “ that
paternal depth made of three threes,” comprise all the secrets
of the Godhead. But besides these secrets of the upper
cabinet, these supernatural depths, there are others secunde
altitudinis, and as Halicarnensis™ calls those which are above
the reach of all but philosophers, φυσικὰ θαύματα, and Aristo-
tle® θαυμαζόμενα κατὰ φύσιν, “ natural miracles,” which none
but scholars can attain to. And these I hope shall never be
discussed upon a shopboard, or enter into any brain that is
not before well ballast with weight and substance at the
bottom: I need not name them to you, you may know them
by this, that when they come into an empty brain, they
breed winds, and turn all into vertigoes and dizziness. There
be yet further lights of a third magnitude, which yet every
one hath not eyes to gaze on, and of this condition are almost
all the speculations in divinity; nay, the ordinariest truth in
a catechism can scarce be forced into a vulgar understand-
ing; his brain is not set that way, and many of our subtlest
worldlings have mistaken the Virgin Mary for an angel, and
the Apostles’ Creed, where only they find mention of her, for
a prayer: and then you cannot imagine what stead a little
learning would stand these men in, what even miracles it
would work upon them.
5. It is but necessity and exigence of nature that those
which are the weak should apply themselves for help and
directions to those that are stronger; the child in a cradle
must be put to a nurse, which may give it suck till it be
able to eat, and for a while bear it in her arms, that it may
be taught to go. There be in nature, saith Aristotle® in his
Mechanics, many wants; she performs not all our needs, and
therefore engines were invented to supply defects. Thus is
art a machina or invention, πρὸς τὰς τοιαύτας ἀπορίας βοη-
θοῦν μέρος, to furnish us with those abilities which nature
was a niggard in: and therefore to deprive ourselves of this
guidance when it is offered, is μονόφθαλμον τυφλοῦν», to put
out an eye of his that hath but one in all, which was of old
m [πρᾶγμα κρεῖττον λόγον Tots ἀθεά- » [Aristot. Mechanica. ad init. ]
τοις ὧν 7 φύσις δρᾷ, καὶ θαυμάτων ovde- ° [Id., ibid. }
vos devTepoy.—Dionys. Halicar., lib. i. P (Id. Rhet. i. cap. 7. ad fin.]
cap. lod. ad fin. ]
SERMON XXIL. 475
a great aggravation to the injury in the Rhetoric, indeed to
leave ourselves desperately blind. Περὶ πυθαγορείων aved φω-
τὸς μὴ λάλει, in Jamblichus4, in matters of religion we must
not so much as speak, nay, not think without a candle; we
shall want the guidance of some teacher to direct every such
word out of our mouths, or thought into our hearts. An
ignorant man must not have leave so much as to meditate
on God without a guide; for he is mad, say the philosophers’,
and then every thought of his will be a kind of delirium or
frenzy. “It is the law of nature,” saith the historian’, ἄρχειν
ἡττόνων τοὺς κρείττονας, “that superiors should have a kind
of sovereignty over all that are inferior to them,” a magiste-
rium and command over them, to rule and order them; and
this superiority and sovereignty hath the learned pastor, or
generally the scholar, over all ignorant men, be they never so
rich or potent ; and whosoever denies or scorns thus to obey,
I say not, is to be slain—as the law was in the ancient wars
—axpitws, without an assizes, but to be condemned of much
peevishness and more stupidity, and his punishment is, let
him fall into his own hands, i.e. be ruled by a fool or mad-
mau.
6. Much of the speculative part of religion may be had
from a Pharisee as well as a disciple. Christ Himself bears
witness of him, that he was orthodox in matters concerning
the law: ‘They sit in Moses’ chair, and therefore whatsoever
they bid you, that observe and do.” They err indeed in pre-
scribing their additions to duty, as divine command, but the
chief obliquity was in their lives: they were heretics, nay
apostates from their doctrine, and therefore “do not after
their works, for they say and do not.” If I am resolved of
such a man’s abilities in learning, but see him a scandalous
liver, I will borrow of his gifts, and pray God to increase his
graces. In matters of spiritual joy and sorrow, I will, if I
can, be counselled by an heart which once was broken, that
I may see how he recovered, and repair my breaches by a
pattern; and yet even these things may be learnt from him
which never had them but in his speculation; as the phy-
siclan may cure a disease, though himself was never sick of it.
4 Jamblichus, [De Vita Pythagore, 122. p. 94. ed. Potter. ]
cap. xxiii. § 105. ] " [Dionys. Haliear., lib. i. c. 5. ]
"(Clemens Alexand. Protrept. ὃ
Mat. xxiii.
3.
ver. 4.
[Job ix.
28. ]
2 Pet. iii.
3.
476 SERMON XXII.
But for the ordinary theories of religion, I will have patience
to receive instructions from any one, and not examine his
practices, but in modesty, and in submission, and humility
receive the law at his mouth. But all this with caution, ὡς
ἡγεμόνι, ov δεσπότῃ, “as to a guide, not a monarch” of my
faith ; rule he shall my belief, but not tyrannize over it. I
will assent to my teacher till I can disprove him, but adhere,
and anchor, and fix myself on the Scripture.
7. In matters of superstruction, where Scripture lays the
foundation, but interpreters, i.e. private spirits, build upon
it, some gold, some stubble, &c., and I cannot judge or discern
which is firmliest rooted on the foundation; I will take the
philosopher’s counsel in the first of his Rhetoric ἡ, and observe
either ti παλαιοὶ or πρόσφατοι, be guided either by the
ancientest, if they have shewed themselves in the cause, or
else men alive, which be best reputed of for integrity and
judgment: I shall scarce trust the honestest man you can
commend to me, unless I have some knowledge of his parts;
nor the learnedest you can cry up, unless I can believe some-
what in his sincerity.
8. All the contradictions and new ways of my own brain
opposite or wide from the current of the learned, I must
suspect for a work of my own fancy, not entitle them to
God’s Spirit in me. Verebar omnia opera mea, saith Job,
whatever a man can call his own, he must be very cautious
and jealous over it. For it is no less than atheism which the
scorners of the last age are to fall upon by “walking after
their own lusts.” And thus was the Pharisee’s practice here,
who makes use of his own authority to deny Christ; it was
the Pharisees that said, “ Have any of the Pharisees believed
on Him?” There is not a more dangerous mother of here-
sies in the midst of piety than this one, that our fancy first
assures us that we have the Spirit, and then that every fancy
of ours is theopneust, the work of the Spirit. There are a
multitude of deceits got altogether here; 1. We make every
idle persuasion of our own the evidence of God’s Spirit, then
we join infallibility to the person, being confident of the
gift; then we make every breath of our nostrils, and flame
that can break out of our hearts, an immediate effect of the
τ (Arist. Rhet., lib. 1. ο. 15. § 13.]
mae i Til Ὁ
SERMON XXII. 477
Spirit, and fire which hath spiritually enlivened us, and then
we are sure it is authentical; and all this while we never
examine either the ground or deductions from it, but take
all upon trust from that everlasting deceiver, our own heart,
which we ought to sit upon, and judge of by proofs and wit-
nesses, by comparing it with other men’s dictates, probably
as godly, perhaps more learned, but certainly more impartial
judges of thee, than thou canst be of thyself.
| Lastly, if the word of God speak distinctly and clearly ;
enforce, as here by miracles done before all men to their
astonishment and redargution, then will I not stay my belief
to wait on or follow the learnedest man in the world: when
Christ Himself speaks to my eyes, the proudest, eminentest
Pharisee in earth or hell, nay if any of their sect have
crowded into heaven, shall not be able to charm my ear or
lay any clog upon my understanding. So that you see the
Pharisee’s argument in that case was sophistical,—the matter
being so plain to them that they needed no advice, ‘“ His Jonn ν. 36.
works bore witness of Him,”—yet in the general it holds pro-
bable, and learning remains a goed guide. still, though an ill
master in matters of religion; ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι, the first
thing we undertook to demonstrate.
And this we should draw down yet lower to our practice,
_ and that variously, but that almost every proposition insisted
on hath in part spoken to your affections, and so prevented
store of uses. This only must not be omitted ; for scholars to
learn to set a value on their precious blessing which God hath
vouchsafed them above all the world beside, to bless God in-
finitely that they understand and conceive what they are com-
manded to believe; this I am sure of, there is not a greater
or more blessed privilege, besides God’s Spirit, which our hu-
man condition is capable of, than this of learning, and spe-
cially divine knowledge, of which Aristotle" himself witness-
eth, ἀμείνων δὲ οὐδεμία, “none is better than it.’ As long
as we have no evidence or demonstration from that which
yet it most nearly concerns us to rely upon, we cannot enjoy,
without an immediate supernatural irradiation, a tranquillity
and consistency of spirit; we cannot peremptorily have re-
solved ourselves that we have built upon the rock; every
u [Aristot. Metaph, A, ¢. 2, prope finem. ]
Luke xxiv.
22.
478 SERMON XXII.
temptation proves a discouragement to us, many horrors
take hold of us, and sometimes we must needs fall to that
low ebb, not far from despair, which the Apostles were in,
“ We had trusted,” but now we know not what to think of it,
“that this was He that should have redeemed Israel.” But to
see all the articles of my faith ratified and confirmed to my
understanding, to see the greatest treasure and inheritance in
the world sealed and delivered to me in my hand, written in
a character and language that I am perfectly skilled in; O
what a comfort is this to a Christian soul! O what a fulness
of joy to have all the mysteries of my salvation transcribed
out of the book of the Lord, and written in my heart, where
Τ can turn and survey, and make use of them, as much and
as often as I will! nay, where I have them without book,
though there were neither father nor Bible in the world,
able out of my own stock to give an account, nay, a reason
of my faith, before the perversest papist, heathen, or devil.
This serves me instead of having lived, and conversed, and
been acquainted with Christ. By this I have my fingers put
into the print of the nails, and my hands thrust into His
side, and am as sure as ever Thomas was; I see Him as pal-
pably as he that handled Him, that He is my “ Lord and my
God.”
It was observed by the philosopher* as an act generally prac-
tised among tyrants to prohibit all schools and means of learn-
ing and education in the commonwealth, μήτε παιδείαν, μήτε
σχολὰς, μήτε συλλόγους σχολαστικοὺς, “to suffer neither
learning, nor schools, nor common meetings,” that men being
kept blind might be sure to obey, and tyrannical commands
through ignorance be mistaken for fair government. And thus
did Julian interdict the Christians all manner of literature, and
chiefly philosophy, “ for fear,” saith Nazianzen’, “they should
be able to grapple with the heathen,” and cut off Goliah’s head
with his own weapon. The continuance of these arts of
spiritual tyranny you may observe, in the prescribed stupi-
dity and commanded ignorance of the laity through all Italy.
All which must call for a superlative measure of thanks to
be expressed, not in our tongues and hearts only, but in our
x [ Aristot. Polit., lib. v. ο. 11.]
y §. Gregor. Nazianz. [Oratio iv. §§ 4, 5. Op., tom. i. pp. 79, Ὁ. 80, A.]
SERMON XXIT. 479
lives and actions; from us I say, who have obtained not only
a knowledge of His laws, but almost a vision of His secrets,
and forasmuch as concerns our eternal bliss, do even see
things as they were acted, have already comprehended in our
reason—not only in our faith—the most impossible things in
nature; the breadth and length and depth and height of the
conceived, incarnate, and crucified God; and if all that will
not serve our turn, but we must press into His cabinet
secrets, invade the Book of Life, and oversee and divulge to
all men abscondita Domini Dei nostri,—then are God’s mercies
unworthily repaid by us, and those indulgences which were
to bestow civility upon the world, have only taught us to be
more rude. In sum, the realest thanks we can perform to
God for this inestimable prize, is modestly and softly to
make use of it; 1. To the confirming of others’ faith, and 2. to
the expressing of our own. For, 1, he is the deepest scholar,
saith the philosopher, who is διδασκαλικώτερος, “best able
to teach” other men what himself conceives’: and then, 2, he
hath the habit most radicated who hath pressed it down into
his heart, and there sowed a seed which shall increase and
fructify, and spread, and flourish, laden with the fruits of a
lively faith. He is the truest scholar that hath fed upon
learning, that hath nourished, and grown, and walked, and
lived in the strength of it. And till I see you thrive and
bestir yourselves like Christians, I shall never envy your
learning: the Pharisees were great scholars, well seen in the
prophets, and it is much to be suspected could not choose
but find Christ there, and acknowledge Him by His miracles ;
they saw Him plain enough, and yet not a man would be-
lieve on Him:—my second part—the greatest scholars are
not always the best Christians.
It is observable in the temper of men, that the cowardly
are most inquisitive; their fears and jealousies make them
very careful to foresee any danger, and yet for the most part
they have not spirit enough to encounter, and they are so
stupid and sluggish that they will not get out of its way
when they have foreseen it: the same baseness and timor-
ousness makes them asort of men most diligent at a distance
to avoid, and near hand most negligent to prevent. Thus
2 σημεῖυν εἰδότος δύνασθαι biddoKew.—[ Arist. Metaph. A. c. 1.7
{ Deut.
xxix. 29. ]
Dan. iii. 5.
ver. 25.
480 SERMON XXII.
in Dan. iii. 5, Nebuchadnezzar dreams and is affrighted, and
a proclamation is made for all the wisdom of the world to
come in and consult and sit upon it, and give their verdict
for the interpretation of the dream, and when he had at last
got the knowledge of it by Daniel, that his fears were not in
vain, that the greatest judgment that ever was heard of was
within a twelvemonth to fall on him, then, as though he had
been a beast before his time, without all understanding, he
goes and crowns himself for his slaughter. Just when,
according to the prophecy, he was to suffer, then was he
walking in his pride; whilst he was ignorant, he was sensible
of his danger, and now he sees it before his eyes, he is most
prodigiously blind. “ At the end of twelve months, when his
ruin was at hand, he walked in the palace of the kingdom
of Babylon, and the king spake and said, Is not this great
Babylon that I have built,” &c. In brief, he that was most
earnest to understand the dream, is most negligent of the
event of it, and makes no other use of his knowledge of God’s
will, but only more knowingly and wilfully to contemn it.
And this generally is the state of corrupt nature, to keep a
distance and a bay betwixt our knowledge and our wills, and
when a truth hath fully conquered and got possession of our
understanding, then to begin to fortify most strongly, that
the other castle of the soul, the affections, may yet remain
impregnable. Thus will the devil be content to have the
outworks and the watch-tower taken, so he may be sure to
keep his treasure within from danger: and will give us leave
to be as great scholars as himself, so we will continue as pro-
fane. And so we are like enough to do for all our know-
ledge; for wisdom, saith Aristotle*, is terminated in itself,
οὐδεμιᾶς yap ἐστι γενέσεως, “it neither looks after, nor pro-
duces any practical good,” saith Andronicus”, οὐ yap τέλος
ἔχει πρακτὸν ἀγαθὸν, nay, there is no dependence betwixt
knowing and doing; as he that hath read and studied the
ἀθλητικὰ may perhaps be never the better wrestler, nor the
skilfullest physician the more healthy ; experience and trial
must perfect the one, and a good temperature constitute the
other. A young man may be a good naturalist, a good
geometer, nay a wise man, because he may understand @av-
a {Aristot. Nic, Ethic., lib. vi. c. 13.] " [ Andronicus, Paraphr. in loc. ]
SERMON XXII. 48]
μαστὰ, χαλεπὰ, δαιμόνια “, “ wonders, depths,” nay, ‘“ divine
matters,” but he will never be φρόνιμος, “prudent” or
actually virtuous, i.e. a good moralist: τὰ μὲν οὐ πιστεύου-
σιν οἱ veol, ἀλλὰ λέγουσιν“, moral precepts they cannot be
said to believe, they have not entered so far, they float only
in their memories, they have them by heart, they say them
over by rote, as children do their catechism, or Plato’s
scholars (saith Plutarch) his depths of philosophy; they now
recite them only, and shall then understand them, when they
come of age, when they are staid enough to look into the
meaning of them, and make use of them in their practice.
The mathematics, saith Aristotle’, having nothing to do
with the end or chief good that men look after, never any
man brought good or bad, better or worse into a demonstra-
tion; there is no consultation or election there, only plain
downright diagrams, necessary convictions of the under-
standing. And therefore for these mere speculations, which
hover only in the brain, the youngest wit is nimblest ; for
δεινότης", “ sharpness of apprehension” is a sprightfulness of
the mind, and is there liveliest where there be most spirits:
but prudence and active virtue requires an habituate tem-
per of passions, a staidness of the mind, and long trial and
experience of its own strength, a constancy to continue in
virtue in spite of all foreign allurements or inward dis-
tempers. And the ground of all this is, that those things
that most encumber the will and keep us from practice, do
nothing clog or stop the understanding; sensuality or pleasure
hinders us not from knowing ὅτι τὸ τρίγωνονϑ, «.T.X., that a
“‘triangle hath three angles equal to two right ones,” and
the like. Nay the most insolent tyrannizing passions which
domineer over us, which keep us in awe, and never suffer us
to stir, or move, or walk, or do any thing that is good, will
yet give us leave to understand as much as we would wish;
they have only fettered our hands and feet, have not blinded
our eyes ; as one shut up in the tower from the conversation
of men, may be yet the greatest proficient in speculation ;
¢ [Aristot. Nic. Eth., lib. vi. c. 7. ] his paraphrase on the words σκεπτέον
4 [Ibid., c. 9.1 δὲ πάλιν καὶ περὶ τῆς apeTijs.—Ethic.
ΕἸ ΕΝ ΓΘ. B. ὁ...2.} Nic. vi. 13. ]
Γ [φυσικὴ ἐπιτηδείοτης τῆς ψυχῆς. So 6. (Arist. Eth. Nic., lib. vi. ς. ὅ.]
δεινότης is defined by Andronicus in
HAMMOND. 11
1 Cor. i.
21.
489 SERMON XXII.
the affections being more gross and corporeous,—from thence
called the heels of the soul,—and so easily chained and fet-
tered ; but the understanding most pure and spiritual, and
therefore uncapable of shackles, nay, is many times most
free and active, when the will is most dead and sluggish.
And this may be the natural reason that even Aristotle! may
teach us why the greatest scholars are not always the best
Christians,—the Pharisees well read in the prophets, yet
backwardest to believe,—because faith which constitutes a
Christian is a spiritual prudence, as it is best defined, and
therefore is not appropriate to the understanding; but, if
they be several faculties, is rather seated in the will; the
objects of faith being not merely speculative, but always
apprehended and assented to sub ratione boni, as being the
most unvaluable blessings which ever we desired of the Lord,
or can require. The speculative part of divine wisdom may
make us δαίμονας, “ intelligent spirits,” nay, possibly do it
in the worst notion, render us “ devils.” Real practical know-
ledge only,—prudence,—will make angels, ministering spirits
unto God, teach us to live and be better than we did. So
then, in the first place, learning doth neither make nor sup-
pose men Christians: nay, secondly, it doth per accidens
many times hinder, put a rub in our way, and keep us from
being Christians. Philoponus and Synesius—miracles of
learning—were therefore hardest to be converted, they were
so possessed and engaged in peripatetical philosophy, that
however they might be persuaded to the Trinity, they will
not believe the resurrection. It was too plain a contradic-
tion to philosophical reason ever to enter theirs. Thus in
the 1 Cor. i. 21, “the world by wisdom knew not God :”
they so relied on their reason, and trusted in it for all truths,
that they concluded every thing impossible that would not
concur with their old principles. But this resistance which
reason makes is not so strong but that it may easily be sup-
pressed, and therefore Synesius was made a bishop before he
explicitly believed the resurrection, because they were con-
fident that he which had forsaken all other errors, would
not long continue perverse in this, and so good a Christian
in other things, οὐκ ἄν οὐκ ἐλλαμφθείη, could not choose
[περιττὰ μὲν καὶ θαυμαστὰ, K.7.A.—Arist. Eth. Nic,, lib. vi. c. 7. ]
SERMON XXII. 483
but be illuminated in time, in so necessary a point of faith :
and indeed so it happened in them both.
But there are other more dangerous engines, more insidious
courses which learning uses to supplant or undermine belief ;
other stratagems to keep us out of the way, to anticipate all our
desires or inclinations or thoughts that way-ward; and these
are spiritual pride and self-content. Men are so elevated in
height of contemplation, so well pleased, so fully satisfied in
the pleasures and delights of it, that the first sort scorn to
submit or humble themselves to the poverty and disparage-
ment of believing in Christ; the second are never at leisure
to think of it. For the first, spiritual pride, it is set down
as a reason that “the natural man receives not the things of 1 Cor. ii.
the spirit,” receives them not, i.e. will not take them, will oe
not accept of them, though they are freely given him; “for
they are foolishness unto him,” i. e. so his proud brain reputes
them. The pride of worldly wisdom extremely scorns the
foolishness of Christ, and consequently is infinitely opposite
to faith, which is wrought by special humility.
Secondly, for self-content: σοφοὶ μὴ δεόνται φίλων, saith
Heraclitus in Hesychius*, “ Wise men need no friends,” they
are able to subsist by themselves without any help ; they will
have an happiness of their own making, and scorn to be
beholding to Christ for a new inheritance, they are already
so fully possessed of all manner of contents. Let any man
whisper them of the joys of the new Jerusalem, of the Inter-
cessor that hath saved, of the way thither and made it pass-
able, of all the privileges and promises of our adoption, they
will hear them ὡσεὶ λῆρα, “as old wives’ fables;” they have
the fortunate islands too, their exactest tranquillity and
serenity of mind in a perpetual contemplation, and all the
golden apples in paradise shall not tempt or alarm them out
of it. It is strange to see when such a man is called, what
ado there is to get him out of his dream, to hale him out of
his study to the church, how sleepy, and drowsy, and lethar-
gical he is in matters of religion; how soon a little devotion hath
tired him out, that could have pored over a book incessantly
all his life long, and never thought thus to have been inter-
* [This is a dictum of Theodorus, Hesychius, De Claris Viris, s. y. Theo-
surnamed “A@eos. τοὺς δὲ σοφοὺς αὐτάρ. dorus; ap. Meursium, Op., tom. vii.
kes ὑπάρχοντας, μὴ δεῖσθαι piAwy.— p. 253. |
E12
Rom. vii.
18.
484 SERMON XXII.
dicted the delights of human learning, thus to have been
plucked and torn from the embraces of his Athenian idol.
His conversion is much unlike another man’s; that which
calls others into compass seems to let him loose, thrusts him
abroad into the world, teaches him to look more like a man
than ever he meant, makes him a member of the common-
wealth that was formerly but an anchorite, and forces him to
walk and run the way of God’s commandments, that had
once decreed himself to a chair for ever. In brief, there is
as little hopes of one that indulges himself, and gives him-
self up to the pride and contents of any kind of learning, of
him that terminates knowledge either in itself or else in the
ostentation of it, as of any other that is captived to any one
single worldly or fleshly kind of voluptuousness. This of the
brain, in spite of the philosopher, is an intemperance, as well
as that of the throat and palate, and more dangerous, be-
cause less suspected, and seldomer declaimed against; and
from this epicurism, especially of the soul, good Lord de-
liver us.
Not to heap up reasons of this too manifest a truth,—
would God it were not so undeniable,—take but this one
more, of the unsufficiency of learning never so well used to
make a man a Christian. Let all the knowledge in the
world, profane and sacred, all the force and reason that all
ages ever bragged of, let it concur in one brain, and swell
the head as big as his was in the poem, that travailed of
Minerva: let all Scriptures and fathers join their power and
efficacy, and they shall never by their simple activity pro-
duce a saving faith in any one; all the miracles they can work
are only on the understanding; the will, distinctly taken,
is above their sphere or compass; or if their faculties are not
distinguished, “and to will is present with me,” as well as to
understand, yet they can produce only an absolute simple
general will, that is, an assent and approbation of the abso-
lute goodness of the thing proposed, not a resolute will to
abandon all other worldly purposes to perform that which I
will. Knowledge and right apprehension of things may con-
vince me first of the history, that all that is spoken of or by
Christ, is true, and then of the expedience to apply all His
merits to my soul, but when 1 see all this cannot be done
SERMON XXII. 485
without paying a price, without undoing myself, without
pawning all that I have, my learning, my wealth, my de-
lights, my whole worldly being, without self-denial, then the
general assent, that absolute will, is grown chill and dead;
we are still—whatever we believe—but infidels; all the arti-
cles of the Creed thus assented to are not enough to make
us Christians. So that the issue of all is,—all knowledge
in the world cannot make us deny ourselves, and therefore
all knowledge in the world is not able to produce belief ;
only the Spirit must breathe this power into us of breathing
out ourselves, He must press our breasts, and stifle, and
strangle us; we must give up the natural ghost, He must
force out our earthly breath out of our earthly bodies, or
else we shall not be enlivened by His spiritual. Thus have
you reasons of the common divorce betwixt knowledge and
faith, i. 6. the no manner of dependence betwixt them in
nature. Secondly, the open resistance in some points be-
twixt reason and Scripture. Thirdly, the more secret reluc-
tancies betwixt the pride and contents of learning and the
Spirit. And lastly, the insufficiency of all natural know-
ledge, and transcendency of spiritual, so that he “ cannot know
them, because they are spiritually discerned.” I should now
in very charity release you, but that there is one word behind
of most important necessity to a sermon, and that is of ap-
plication ;
That laying to our hearts the important documents of the
text, our righteousness and faith may exceed that of the
Pharisees’, our preaching and walking may be like that of
Christ’s, “in power and as having authority, and not as the
scribes,” and we not content with a floating knowledge in the
brain, do press and sink it down into our inferior facul-
ties, our senses and affections, till it arise in a full harvest
of fruitful, diligently working faith. It was Zenophanes’!
fancy, ὅλον ὁρᾶν Θεὸν, and that God was all eyes and all
ears, but breathed not, there was no use of that in Him;
and so is it with us, who are always exercising our know-
ledge, powers to see and hear whatever is possible; but for
any breath of life in us, any motion of the Spirit, we have
no use of it: it is not worth valuing or taking notice of,
! [ Xenophanes apud Diogen. Laert. ix. ὃ 19.]
{1 Cor. 11.
14.]
Mat. v. 20.
Mat. vii.
29.
Numb.
xi. 5.
450 SERMON XXII.
nothing so vulgar and contemptible in them that have it,
nothing of which we examine ourselves so slightly, of which
we are so easily mistaken, so willingly deceived, and nothing
that we will be content to have so small a measure of. A
little of it soon tires us out, it is too thin, airy, diet for us to
live upon, we cannot hold. out long on it; like the Israel-
ites, soon satiated with their bread from heaven, nothing
comparable to their old food that Nilus yielded them. “We
remember the fish that we did eat in Egypt, but now our
soul is dried away, there is nothing but this manna before
our eyes ;” as if that were not worth the gathering.
Pythagoras could say, that if any one were to be chosen to
pray for the people, to be made a priest, he must be a virtuous
man, ὡς θεῶν τούτοις TposexovTwy, in Jamblichus, “ because
the gods would take more heed to his word™:” and again,
that “many things might be permitted the people, which
should be interdicted preachers".” It was the confirmation
of his precepts by his life and practice, σύμφωνος βίος", that
made Italy, μέγας EdXas, all the country, his school?, and all
that ever heard him his disciples. Nothing will give such au-
thority to our doctrine, or set such a value on our calling, asa
religious conversation. He that takes such a journey, as that
into holy orders, must go on, ἀμεταστρεπτὶ, according to his
fifteenth Symbolum, must not return to his former sins as well
as trade, saith Jamblichus1: the falling into one of our youthful
vices, is truly a disordering of ourselves, and a kind of plucking
our hands from the plough. A physician, saith Hippocrates’,
must have colour and be in flesh, εὔχροός τε καὶ εὔσαρκος, of
a good promising healthy complexion, and then men will
guess him a man of skill, otherwise the patient will bid the
physician heal himself, and having by his ill look a prejudice
against his physic, his fancy will much hinder its working.
You need no application; he again will tell you, that the
profession suffers not so much by any thing as by rash cen-
sures, and unworthy professors. In brief, our very know-
ledge will be set at nought, and our gifts scoffed at, if our
lives do not demonstrate that we are Christians as well as
m De Vita Pyth., c. xi. 4 [Protrept. Symbol. xv.]
» Tbid., c. xxiv. τ [De Medico; ad init., tom. i. p. 56.
9 Τυϊα., ¢) xxx Kihn. |
P Tbid., c. vi.
SERMON XXII. 487
scholars. No man will be much more godly for hearing
Seneca talk of providence, nor be affected with bare words,
unless he see them armed and backed with power of him
that utters them. Consider but this one thing, and withal,
that my doctrine is become a proverb, and he is a proud
man that can first draw it upon a scholar, his learning and
his clergy make him never the more religious. O let our
whole care and carriage, and the dearest of our endeavours,
strive and prevail to cross the proverb, and stop the mouth
of the rashest declaimer. That comedy of Aristophanes took
best, which was all spent in laughing at Socrates, and in him
involved and abused the whole condition of learning ; though
’ through Alcibiades’ faction it miscarried and missed its ap-
plause once or twice, yet when men were left to their humour,
it was admired and cried up extremely. Learning hath still
some honourable favourers which keep others in awe with
their countenance; but otherwise nothing more agreeable to
the people than comedies or satires, or sarcasms dealt out
against the universities: let us be sure that we act no parts
in them ourselves, nor perform them before they are acted.
Let us endeavour that theirs may be only pronunciations, a
story of our faults as presented in a scene, but never truly
grounded in any of our actions. One woe we are secure
and safe from, “ Woe be to you when all men shall speak Luke vi.
well of you;” we have many good friends that will not let 7°
this curse light on us. O let us deliver ourselves from that
catalogue of woes which were all denounced against the
Pharisees for many vices, all contained in this accomplished
piece, “ Ye say but do not.” And seeing all our intellectual iat xxiii.
excellencies cannot allure, or bribe, or woo God’s Spirit to
overshadow us, and conceive Christ, and bring forth true
and saving faith in us; let all the rest of our studies be
ordered in a new course; let us change both our method
and our tutor, and having hitherto learnt God from our-
selves, let us be better advised, and learn ourselves from
God. Let us all study all learning from the spring or
fountain, and make Him our instructor, who is the only
author worth our understanding, and admit of no inter-
preter on Him but Himself. The knowledge of God shall
be our vision in heaven, O let it be our speculation on
488 SERMON XXII.
earth. Let it fill every conceit or fancy that we at any
time adventure on. It is πάσης πραγματείας τελεσιούρ-
γημα, the last work in which all the promises, all our pos-
sible designs are accomplished: O let us in part anticipate
that final revelation of Him, lest so sudden and so full a
brightness of glory be too excellent for the eyes of a saint:
and labour to comprehend here, where the whole comfort
of our life is, what we shall then possess. And if all the
stretches, and cracking, and torturing of our souls will prevail,
the dissolving of all our spirits, nay, the sighing out of our
last breath will do any thing, let us join all this even that
God hath given us, in this last real service to ourselves, and
expire whilst we are about it, in praying, and beseeching, and
importuning, and offering violence to that blessed Spirit, that
He will fully enlighten and inflame us here with zeal as well
as knowledge; that He will fill us with His grace here, and
accomplish us with His glory hereafter.
Now to Him that hath elected us, hath created us, and
redeemed us, &c.
SERMON XXIII.
Marr. x. 15.
It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah
in the day of judgment, than for that city.
Tue whole new covenant consists of these two words,
Christ and faith; Christ bestowed on God’s part, faith
required on ours; Christ the matter, faith the condition
of the covenant. Now to bring or present this faith before
you, as an object for your understandings to gaze at, or
to go further, to dissect—and with the diligence of anatomy
instruct—in every limb, or joint, or excellency of it, were
but to recall you to your catechism, and to take pains to
inform you in that which you are presumed to know. The
greater danger of us is, that we are behind in our prac-
tice; that we know what faith is, but do not labour for it ;
and therefore the seasonablest work will be on our affec-
tions, to produce, if it were possible, this precious virtue in
our souls, and to sink and press down that floating know-
ledge which is in most of our brains, into a solid weighty effec-
tual faith, that it may begin to be ἔργον πίστεως, “a work of [1 Thess.
faith,” which was formerly but a fancy, dream, and apparition. * 5:1
To this purpose to work on your wills, no rhetoric so likely
as that which is most sharp and terrible, no such physic for
dead affections as corrosives, the consideration of the dismal,
hideous, desperate estate of infidels here in my text; and
that both in respect of the guilt of the sin, and degree of
the punishment proportioned to it, and that above all other
sinners in the world, “It shall be more,” &c. Where you ver. 4.
may briefly observe, 1. the sin of infidelity, set down by its
ver. 14,
Mat. xi.
14.
John i, 12.
John i. 22.
4.90 SERMON XXIII.
subject, that city which would not receive Christ being
preached unto it ; 2. the greatness of this sin, expressed by the
punishment attending it; and that either positively, it shall
go very sore with it, and therefore it is to be esteemed a very
great sin, implied in the whole text; or else comparatively,
being weighed with Sodom and Gomorrah in judgment, it
shall be more tolerable for them than it: and therefore it is
not only a great sin, but the greatest, the most damning sin
in the world. And of these in order plainly, and to your hearts
rather than your brains, presuming that you are now come
with solemn serious thoughts to be edified, not instructed,
much less pleased or humoured. And first of the first: the
sin of infidelity, noted in the last words, “ that city.”
To pass by those which we cannot choose but meet with,
1. a multitude of ignorant infidels, pagans and heathens ;
2. of knowing but not acknowledging infidels, as Turks and
Jews; we shall meet with another order of as great a latitude,
which will more nearly concern us; a world of believing in-
fidels, which know and acknowledge Christ, the gospel and
the promises, are as fairly mounted in the understanding
part as you would wish, but yet refuse and deny Him in their
hearts, apply not a command to themselves, submit not to
Him, nor desire to make themselves capable of those mercies
which they see offered by Christ in the world; and these are
distinctly set down in the verse next before my text, “ Who-
soever shall not receive you,” i.e. entertain the acceptable
truth of Christ and the gospel preached by you, as it is inter-
preted by the fortieth verse, “ He that receiveth you, receiveth
Me,” i.e. believes on Me, as the word is most plainly used,
Matt. xi. 14; “If you will receive it,” i. 6. if you will believe it,
“ this is Elias which was for to come.” And Johni.12; “To
as many as received Him,—even to them that believe in His
name.” For you are to know that faith truly justifying is
nothing in the world but the receiving of Christ. Christ
and His sufferings and full satisfaction was once on the cross
tendered, and is ever since by the gospel and its ministers
offered to the world: and nothing required of us but a
hand and a heart to apprehend and receive: and to “as
many as received Him, He gives power to become the sons of
God.” So that faith and infidelity are not acts properly de-
SERMON XXIII. 491
termined to the understanding, but indeed to the whole soul,
and most distinctly to the will, whose part it is to receive or
repel, to entertain or resist Christ and His promises, “ the [Heb. xii.
Author and Finisher of our salvation.” Now this receiving Ae
of Christ is the taking or accepting of the righteousness of
Christ, and so making it our own, as Rom. i. 17, being rightly Rom. i. 17,
weighed, will enforce. Read and mark, δικαιοσύνη yap Θεοῦ
ἐν αὐτῷ ἀποκαλύπτεται ἐκ πίστεως εἰς πίστιν, thus ἐν ἀυτῳ
“init,” or by it, the gospel, mentioned in the former verse ; d:-
καιοσύνη Θεοῦ ἐκ πίστεως, “the righteousness of God by faith,”
as Rom. 111. 22, 1. e. the not legal but evangelical righteousness, Rom. iii,
which only God accepts, directly set down, Phil. iii. 9, “that en wh
righteousness which is through faith of Christ, the righte-
ousness which is of God by faith ;” ἀποκαλύπτεται εἰς πίστιν
“is revealed to faith,” is declared that we might believe; that
finding no life or righteousness in ourselves, we may go out
of ourselves, and lay hold on that which is offered us by
Christ; and this you will find to be the clearest meaning
of these words, though somewhat obscured in our English
reading of them. Now the accepting of this righteousness
is an act of ours following a proposal or offer of Christ’s, and
consummating the match or bargain between Christ and us.
Christ is offered to us as an husband in the gospel; we enquire
of Him, observe our own needs, and His excellencies and riches
to supply them, our sins and His righteousness; and if upon
advice we will take Him, the match is struck, we are our be-
loved’s, and our beloved is ours; we are man and wife, we have
taken Him for our husband, and with Him are entitled to all
His riches: we have right to all His righteousness, and enjoy
by His patent all the privileges, all the promises, all the mer-
cies of the gospel. But if, the offer being thus made by God
to give us His Son freely, we stand upon terms,—we are too
rich, too learned, too worldly-minded, too much in love with
the praise of men, i. e. fixed upon any worldly vanity, and re- John xii.
solve never to forego all these, to disclaim our worldly liberty, ing
our own righteousness, and to accept of so poor an offer as
a Christ; then are we the infidels here spoken of, “ we will John v. 40.
not come to Him that we might have life.’ When He is
held out to us, we will not lay hold on Him, we have some
conceit of ourselves, and therefore will not step a foot abroad
John v. 44.
[ Acts v. 2.]
Rom. i. 28.
4.92 SERMON XXIII.
to fetch His righteousness home to us. And indeed if any
worldly thing please you; if you can set a value upon any
thing else, if you can entertain a paramour, a rival, a compe-
titor in your hearts, if you can “receive the praise of men,
how can you believe?” So that, in brief, infidelity consists in
the not receiving of Christ with a reciprocal giving up of our-
selves to Him, in the not answering affirmatively to Christ’s
offer of Himself, in the not taking home and applying Christ
to our souls. And this is done, either by denying to take
Him at all, or by taking Him under a false person, or by not
performing the conditions required or presumed in the making
of the match. They that deny to take Him at all, are the pro-
fane, negligent, presumptuous Christians, who either never
hearken after Him, or else are so familiar with the news as to
underprize Him: have either never cheapened heaven, or else
will not come to God’s price; like Ananias and Sapphira, per-
haps offer pretty fair, bring two parts of their estate and lay
them at the Apostles’ feet, but will give no more; fall off at
last for a trifle, and peremptorily deny Christ if they may
not have Him on their own conditions. Some superfluities,
some vanities, some chargeable or troublesome sins, perhaps,
they can spare, and those they will be inclinable to part
withal; but if this will not serve, Christ must seek for a
better chapman, they stand not much upon it, they can
return as contentedly without it as they came. And this
arises from a neglect and security, a not heeding or weigh-
ing of God’s justice, and consequently undervaluing of His
mercies. They have never felt God as an angry Judge, and
therefore they now scorn Him as a Saviour: they have lived
at such ease of heart, that no legal terror, no affrightments,
or ghastly representations of sin can work upon them: and
if the reading of the law, that killing letter, have been sent
by God to instruct them in the desperateness of their estate,
to humble these libertine souls to the spirit of bondage, and
so school them to Christ, they have eyes, but see not, ears,
but hear it not, they are come to this νοῦς ἀδόκιμος, “a repro-
bate sense,” or as it may berendered, “ an undiscerning mind,”
not able to judge of that which is thus read and proposed to
it; or again a sense without sense, not apprehensive of that
which no man that hath eyes can be ignorant of; nay, in
SERMON XXIIt. 493
Theodoret’s phrase, νοῦς ἀντίτυπος, an heart that will rever-
berate any judgment or terror, receiving no more impression
from it than the anvil from the hammer, violently return it
again, smoothed somewhat over perhaps by often-beating,
but nothing softened. Nay if the law ery too loud, and by
an inward voice preach damnation in their bowels, and re-
solve to be heard before it cease; then do they seek out
some worldly employment to busy themselves withal, that
they may not be at home at so much unquietness: they
will charm it with pleasures, or overwhelm it with business,
as Cain, when his conscience was too rough and rigid for.
him, went out from the presence of the Lord, and as it is Gen.iv. 16.
observed, “built cities,’ got some of his progeny to invent ver. 17.
music, perhaps to still his tumultuous raving conscience, ver. 21.
that the noise of the hammers and melody of the instru-
ments might outsound the din within him, as in the sacri-
fices of Moloch, where their children, which they offered in
an hollow brazen vessel, could not choose but howl hideously,
they, had timbrels and tabrets perpetually beating,—where-
upon Tophet, where these sacrifices were kept, is by gram-
marians deduced from »)n tympanum*,—to drown the noise 2 Kings
of the children’s cry ; these, I say, which will not be instructed **#- 10.
in their misery, or bettered by the preaching of the law,
which labour only to make their inward terrors insensible,
to skin, not cure, the wound, are infidels in the first or
highest rank, which deny to take Him at all, will not suffer
themselves to be persuaded that they have any need of Him;
and therefore let Him be offered for ever, let Him be pro-
claimed in their ears every minute of their lives, they see
nothing in Him worth hearkening after; and the reason is,
they are still at home, they have not gone a foot abroad out
of themselves, and therefore cannot lay hold on Christ. He
that never went to school to the law, he that was never sen-
sible of his own damned estate, he that never hated himself,
ov μὴ δέξεται, ‘ will never receive,’ never accept of Christ.
Secondly, some are come thus far to a sense of their estate,
and are twinged extremely, and therefore fly presently to the
gospel; hearing of Christ, they fasten, are not patient of so
much deliberation as to observe whether their hands be empty ;
4 Selden, De Diis Syriis. Syntagma i. cap. 6. [Op.; tom. ii, p. 314. ]
4.94: SHRMON XXIII.
they are in distress, and Christ must needs save them sud-
denly ; they lay hold as soon as ever they hear a promise, and
are resolved to be saved by Christ, because they see otherwise
they are damned. And these take Christ indeed, but under
a false person; either they take the promises only, and let
Christ alone, or take Christ the Saviour, but not Christ the
Lord ; are willing to be saved by Him, but never think of
serving Him; are praying for ever for heaven and glory, but
never care how little they hear of grace; the end they fasten
on, the covenant they hug and gripe with their embraces,
but never take the condition of repentance and obedience ;
this is not for their turn; they abstract the cheap and pro-
fitable attributes of Christ, His priestly office of satisfaction
and propitiation, but never consider Him as a King; and
so, in a word, lay hold of the estate before they have married
the husband, which they have yet no more right to than a
mere stranger; for the communicating the riches of a hus-
band being but a consequence of marriage, is therefore not
yet made over till the marriage—which is the taking of the
husband’s person—be consummate. And this, I say, is a
second degree of infidelity, somewhat more secret and less
discernible, when by an error of the person, by taking Christ
the Saviour for Christ the Lord, or His promises abstracted
from His person, we believe we shall be saved by Him, but
deny to be ruled; desire to enjoy all the privileges, but sub-
tract all the obedience of a subject.
In the third place, they which have accepted and received
the true person of Christ as a Master, as well as a Jesus,
they which have taken Him on a resolved vow of performing
this condition of homage and obedience, are not im event as
good as their engagements; when they think the match is
fast, and past danger of recalling, when they seem to have
gotten a firm title to the promises, and are in a manner en-
tered upon the goods and estate of their husband, they do
begin to break covenant, and either wholly subtract, or else
divide their love ; they married Him for His wealth, and now
they have that, they are soon weary of His person; they came
with the soul of an harlot, looking only what they should
get by Him, and now they have many other old acquaintances
they must needs keep league with; their self-denial, their
SERMON XXIII. 495
humility, their vows of obedience were but arts and strata-
gems that want and necessity put them upon, and now they
have got their ends, all those are soon out-dated; they have
faith and so are justified, and sure of their estate, and so now
they may sin securely, “there is no condemnation to them, | Rom. viii.
they are in Christ,” and all the sins, nay, all the devils in al
the world shall never separate them. And this is a sanctified
religious piece of infidelity in men, which think they have
made sure of the main, and so never think of the consec-
taries ; they have faith, and so it is no matter for good works ;
the lease is sealed, the wedding solemnized, and then never
dream or care for covenants. And these men’s fate is like
to be the same spiritually, which we read of Samson’s bodily
strength; he vowed the vow of a Nazarite, and as long as he
kept unshaven no opposition could prevail against him ; but
as soon as he broke his vow, when he had let his mistress [Judg. xvi.
cut his locks, his strength departed from him. All the pro- ὍΝ
mises and privileges of our being in Christ are upon con-
dition of our obedience, and our vow being broken, the devil
and the Philistines within us will soon deprive us of our
eyes and life. Whatsoever livelihood we presume we have
in Christ, we are deceived, we are still “dead in trespasses [Eph. ii.
and sins.” Thus do you see the three degrees of infidelity ~
frequent amongst Christians, 1. a not taking Him at all, 2. a
mistaking of His person; 3. a breaking of the covenants :
now that you may abhor and fly from, and get out of each
of them by a lively faith, my next particular shall warn you,
‘the greatness of this sin, and that first positively in itself, “it
shall be very intolerable for that city.”
Faith may be conceived in a threefold relation, either to
men, the subjects of it, and those sinners ; or 2. to Christ, and
His sufferings, the objects of it, with all the effects, remission
of sins, and salvation attending it; or 3. to God the Father,
the author and commander of it, as the only condition an-
nexed to all His promises. And consequently infidelity, ἐκ
παραλλήλου, shall be aggravated by these three depths or
degrees, each adding to its exceeding sinfulness.
As faith respects its subject, and that a sinful, miserable
one, engaged and fixed in an unremediable necessity of sin-
ning and suffering for ever; so is it the only means upon
--
15}
4.96 SERMON XXIII,
earth, nay in the very counsel of God, able to do us any
help; all the arts and spiritual engines even in heaven be-
sides this are unprofitable. Nay, the second covenant now
being sealed, and God for ever having established the rule
and method of it; I say, things thus standing, God Himself
cannot be presumed to have mercy upon any one but who is
thus qualified; it being the only foundation on which our
heaven is built, the only ground we have to hope for any
thing, as is manifest by that place, being rightly weighed,
Heb. xi. l. ‘* Now faith is the substance of things hoped for,” where the
Greek phrase, ὑπόστασις ἐλπιζομένων, signifies the ground
or foundation of every of those things which can be the ob-
ject of a Christian’s hope. So that where no ground-work,
no building; if no faith, no hope, no possibility of heaven.
If the devil could have but stolen this jewel out of the world,
he had shut up heaven gates eternally, and had left it as
empty of saints as it is full of glory, not capable of any flesh
but what Christ’s hypostatical union brought thither. And
this is no more than I conceive the learned mean by neces-
sitas medii, that faith is necessary as a means, i. e. there is
no means besides of power, either absolutely or ex hypothesi,
of itself or on supposition of God’s covenant, to bring us to
heaven. Nothing is of force besides in reason to prepare, or
morally accommodate; and God hath not promised to accept
in mercy of any thing else. For whereas the promises are
sometimes made to repentance, sometimes to obedience, as,
whosoever repenteth shall be saved, and the like; you are to
know, that it is on this ground of the necessary union of
these graces, that where one of them is truly and sincerely,
there the rest are always in some degree, there being no
example of penitence or obedience in any subject which had
Heb. xi. 6. not faith also. ‘“ For he that comes to God must believe that
He is,” &c. And he that heartily believes He is, and is “a
rewarder of them that seek Him,” will not fail to search,
pursue, and follow after Him. So that, though the promises
are made promiscuously to any one which hath either of
these graces, yet it is upon supposal of the rest; if it be
Gal, v. 6, made of faith, it is in confidence that “faith works by love,”
Jam. ii, 22, and as St. James enforces it, “is made perfect by works.”
So that, in the first place, infidelity is sufficiently aggravated
SERMON XXIII. 497
in respect of the subject; it being a catholic destroyer, an
intervenient that despoils him of all means, all hope, all pos-
sibility of salvation: finding him in the state of damnation,
it sets him going, suffers him not to lay hold on any thing
that may stay him in his precipice; and in the midst of his
shipwreck, when there be planks and refuges enough about
him, hath numbed his hands, deprived him of any power of
taking hold of them.
In the second place, in respect of Christ and His suffer-
ings, the objects of our faith, so faith is in a manner the soul
of them, giving them life and efficacy, making things which
are excellent in themselves prove so in effect to others. Thus
the whole splendour and beauty of the world, the most accu-
rate proportions and images of nature are beholding to the
eye, though not for their absolute excellency, yet for both the
account and use that is made of them; for if all men were
blind, the proudest workmanship of nature would not be
worth the valuing. Thus is a learned piece cast away upon
the ignorant, and the understanding of the auditor is the
best commendation of a speech or sermon. In like manner,
those infinite unvaluable sufferings of Christ, if they be not
believed in, are but, as Aristotle” saith of divine knowledge,
“a most honourable thing, but of no manner of use ;” if they
be not apprehended, they are lost. Christ’s blood if not
caught up in our hearts by faith, but suffered to be poured
out upon the earth, will prove no better than that of Abel,
“crying for judgment from the ground ;” that which is spilt Gen. iv. 10,
is clamorous, and its voice is toward heaven for vengeance ;
only that which is gathered up, as it falls from His side, by
faith will prove a medicine to heal the nations. So that in-
fidelity makes the death of Christ no more than the death of
an ordinary man, “in which there is no remedy,” οὐκ ἔστιν Wisd. ii. 1.
ἴασις, “there is no cure,” no physic in it ; or as the same word
is rendered, “no pardon,” no remission wrought by it, a bare Eccles,
going down into the grave, that no man is better for. It **¥4) ὅ.
doth even frustrate the sufferings of Christ, and make Him
have paid a ransom to no purpose, and purchased an inherit-
ance at an infinite rate, and no man the better for it. Again,
Christ is not only contemned, but injured, not only slighted,
> [Metaph., A. c. 2.]
HAMMOND. Kk
Luke i. 74.
Luke i. 74.
1 Cor. y.
20.
498 SERMON XXIII.
but robbed, He loses not only His price and His thanks, but
His servant, which He hath bought and purchased with His
blood. For redemption is not an absolute setting free, but
the buying out of an usurper’s hands, that he may return
to his proper lord; changing him from the condition of a
captive to a subject. He which is ransomed from the galleys
is not presently a king, but only recovered to a free and
tolerable service: nay generally, if he be redeemed, he is 60
nomine a servant, by right and equity his creature that
redeemed him, according to the express words, “that we
being delivered might serve Him.” Now a servant is a
possession, part of one’s estate, as truly to be reckoned his as
any part of his inheritance. So that every unbeliever is a
thief, robs Christ not only of the honour of saving him, but
of one of the members of His family, of part of His goods,
His servant; nay, it is not a bare theft, but of the highest
size, a sacrilege, stealing an holy instrument, a vessel out of
God’s temple, which He bought and delivered out of the
common calamity to “serve Him in holiness,” to be put to
holy, special services.
In the third place, faith may be considered in reference to
God the Father, and that 1. as the author or fountain of this
theological grace ; 2. as the commander of this duty of believ-
ing; and either of these will aggravate the unbeliever’s guilt,
and add more articles to his indictment. As God is the
author of faith, so the infidel resists, and abandons, and flies
from all those methods, all those means, by which God ordi-
narily produces faith; all the power of His Scriptures, all
the blessings of a Christian education, all the benefits of
sacred knowledge; in sum, the prayers, the sweat, the lungs,
the bowels of His ministers, in Christ’s stead “ beseeching
you to be reconciled,” spending their dearest spirits, and
even praying and preaching out their souls for you, that
you would be friends with God through Christ. All these,
I say, the infidel takes no notice of, and by his contempt of
these inferior graces, shews how he would carry himself even
towards God’s very Spirit, if it should come in power to con-
vert him, he would hold out and bid defiance, and repel the
omnipotent God with His omnipotent charms of mercy: he
that contemns God’s ordinary means, would be likely to re-
SERMON XXIII. 4.99
sist His extraordinary, were there not more force in the means
than forwardness in the man: and thanks be to that con-
trolling, convincing, constraining Spirit, if ever he be brought
to be content to be saved. He that will not now believe in
Christ when He is preached, would have gone very near, if
he had lived then, to have given his consent, and joined his
suffrage in crucifying Him. A man may guess of his incli-
nation by his present practices, and if he will not now be His
disciple, it was not his innocence, but his good fortune, that
he did not then betray Him. It was well he was born amongst
Christians, or else he might have been as sour a professed
enemy of Christ as Pilate, or the Pharisees: an unbelieving
Christian is, for all his livery and profession, but a Jew or
heathen, and the Lord make him sensible of his condition.
Lastly, consider this duty of faith im respect of God the
Father commanding it, and then you shall find it the main
precept of the Bible. It were long to shew you the ground
of it in the law of nature, the obscure, yet discernible men-
tion of it in the moral law, both transcendently, in the main
end of all, and distinctly, though not clearly, in the first
commandment; he that hath a mind to see may find it in
Pet. Baronius, de prestantia et dignitate divine legis. It were
as toilsome to muster up all the commands of the Old Tes-
tament, which exactly and determinately drive at belief in
Christ; as generally, in those places, where the Chaldee
Paraphrase reads instead of God, God’s Word, as, “ fear not,
Abraham, for I am thy shield,” say they, ‘‘ My Word is thy
shield,” which speaks a plain command of faith; for not to
fear is to trust; not to fear on that ground, because God’s
word, ὁ Adyos, “the Word,” Christ, is one’s shield, is nothing John i, 1.
in the world but to believe, and rely, and fasten, and depend
on Christ. Many the like commands of faith in Christ will
the Old Testament afford, and the New is nothing else but a
perpetual inculcating of it upon us, a driving and calling, en-
treating and enforcing, wooing and hastening us to believe.
In which respect the schools call it also necessary neces-
sitate precepti, a thing which though we should be never the
better for, we are bound to perform. So that though faith
were not able to save us, yet infidelity would damn us, it
being amongst others a direct breach of a natural, a moral,
Kk2
500 SERMON XXIII.
nay, an evangelical commandment. And so much for the
danger of infidelity considered positively in relation to the
subject whom it deprives of heaven; the object, Christ and
His offers in the Gospel, which it frustrates; and lastly the
author and commander of it, God the Father, whom it resists,
disobeys, and scorns. You will perhaps more feelingly be
affected to the loathing of it, if we proceed to the odious and
dangerous condition of it, above all other sins and breaches
in the world, which is my third part, its comparative sinful-
ness, “‘ It shall be more tolerable,” ἕο.
And this will appear, if we consider it, 1. in itself; 2.
in its consequences. In itself it is fuller of guilt, in its con-
. sequences fuller of danger, than any ordinary breach of the
Heb. x. 38.
ver. 39.
2 Mace. vi.
12.
Gal. ii. 12.
moral law. In itself, so it is 1. the greatest aversion from
God,—in which aversion the schoolmen place the formalis
ratio, the very essence of sin—it is the perversest remotion
and turning away of the soul from God, and getting as far as
we can out of His sight, or ken, the forbidding of all manner
of commerce or spiritual traffic, or correspondence with God,
as may appear by that admirable place, Heb. x. 38, “ The
just shall live by faith; but if any man draw back, my soul
hath no pleasure in him ;” and ver. 39, “ We are not of them
which draw back unto perdition, but of them that do believe
to the saving of the soul.” Where the phrase of drawing
back opposed here to faith and believing, is in the original
ὑποστολὴ, ἃ cowardly, pusillanimous subducing of one’s-self,
a getting out of the way, a not daring to meet, or approach,
or accept of Christ when He is offered them; the same with
συστολὴ among the physicians, a contraction of the soul,
a shrivelling of it up, a sudden correption and depression of
the mind, such as the sight of some hideous danger is wont
to produce, so 2 Macc. vi. 12, συστέλλεσθαι, x. τ. λ., to
be discouraged, and to forsake the Jewish religion, because
of the calamities. So is the word used of Peter, ὑπέστελ-
he καὶ ἀφώριζεν ἑαυτὸν, φοβούμενος, x.T.r., “he withdrew
and separated himself, fearing those that were of the cir-
cumcision.” The infidel, I say, draws back, withdraws and
sneaks out of the way, as if he were afraid of the mereies of ᾿
his Saviour, as if it were death to him to be so near salva-
tion; as if Christ coming to him with the mercies of the
SERMON XXIII. 501]
gospel, were the mortalest enemy under heaven, and there
were no such mischief to be done him as his conversion.
This indeed is an aversion in the highest degree, when we
fly and draw back from God when He comes to save us,
when the sight of a Saviour makes us take our heels. Adam
might well hide himself when God came to challenge him
about his disobedience; the guilty conscience being afraid
of revenge, may well slink out of His presence with Cain. Gen. iv. 16,
But to tremble and quake at a proclamation of mercy, when
God “draws with cords of a man,” a powerful phrase expressed Hos. xi. 4.
in the next words with “the bands of love; when He loveth
us, and calls His Son out for us, then to be “bent to back-
sliding,” in the seventh verse, to draw back when He comes
to embrace, this is a stubbornness and contraction of the
soul, a crouching of it in, a συστολὴ or ὑποστολὴ, that
neither nature nor reason would be guilty of: an aversion
from God, which no other sin can parallel, and therefore of
all other most intolerable in the first place.
2. Infidelity gives God the he, and denies whatever God
proclaims in the gospel. The reason or ground of any one’s
belief, the objectum formale quo, that, by assenting to which I
-come to believe, is God’s veracity; the confidence that God
speaks true, the relying on His word, is that which brings
me to lay hold on Christ ; and therefore the infidel is down-
right with God; he will not take His word, he will never be
persuaded that these benefits of Christ’s death that are offered
to all men, can ever do him any good. Let God call him to
accept them, he will never come; his surly, resolute carriage
is in effect a contradicting of whatever God hath affirmed, a
direct thwarting, a giving the lie to God and His Evangelists :
and this is an aggravation not to be mentioned without reve-
rence or horror, the most odious affront in the world; the
Lord be merciful to us in this matter.
Next, this sin is a sin of the most dangerous consequences
of any.
1. It produces all other sins; and that positively, by
doubting of His justice, aud so falling into adulteries, blas-
phemies, and the like, in security and hope of impunity; by
distrusting of His providence and mercy, and so flying to
covetousness, murmuring, tempting, subtlety, all arts and
[Eph. ii.
20.]
John iii. 18.
Ecclus. xx.
25.
1 Cor. xv.
17.
502 SERMON XXIII.
stratagems of getting for our temporal estate, and ordinary
despair in our spiritual: then privatively, depriving us of that
which is the mother and soul of our obedience and good
works, I mean faith, so that every thing for want of it is
turned into sin, and thereby depopulating the whole man,
making him nothing in the world but ruins and noisomeness,
a confluence of all manner of sins, without any concomitant
degree of duty or obedience.
2. It frustrates all good exhortations, and forbids all man-
ner of superstructions which the ministers are wont to labour
for in moving us to charity, and obedience, and joy, and
hope, and prayer, by not having laid any foundation where-
on these must be built; any of these set or planted in any
infidel heart will soon wither: they must have a stock of
faith whereon to be grafted, or else they are never likely to
thrive. As Galba’s wit was a good one, but it was unluckily
placed, ill-seated, there was no good to be wrought by it.
The proudest of our works or merits, the perfectest morality
wilf stand but very weakly, unless it be founded on that
foundation whose corner-stone is Christ Jesus.
3. It leaves no place in the world for remedy: he that
is an idolater, a sabbath-breaker, or the like; he that is
arraigned at the law, and found guilty at that tribunal, hath
yet an advocate in the gospel, a higher power to whom he
may appeal to mitigate his sentence: but he that hath sinned
against the gospel, hath no further to go, he hath sinned
against that which should have remitted all other sins; and
now he is come to an unremediable estate, to a kind of hell,
or the grave of sin, from whence there is no recovery. There
is not a mercy to be fetched in the world but out of the
gospel, and he that hath refused them is past any further
treaty: “He that believeth not is condemned already ;” his
damnation is sealed to him, and the entail past cutting off;
it is his purchase, and now wants nothing but livery and
seizin ; nay, it is his patrimony, ἀπώλειαν ἐκληρονόμησεν, he
is as sure of it, as of any pennyworth of his inheritance.
And the reason is implied, “If Christ be not risen, you are
yet in your sins:” there is no way to get out of our
sins but Christ’s resurrection, and he that believeth not,
Christ is not risen to him: it were all one to him if there
SERMON XXIII. 503
had never been a Saviour; and therefore he remains in his
old thraldom; he was taken captive in Adam, and hath never
since had any other means to restore him: the ransom that
was offered all, he would none of, and so he sticks unredeemed,
he is yet in his sins, and so for ever like to continue. And
now he is come to this state, it were superfluous further to
aggravate the sin against him; his case is too wretched to be
upbraided him, the rest of our time shall be employed in
providing a remedy for him, if it be possible, and that must
be from consideration of the disease, in a word and close of
application.
The sin being thus displayed to you with its consequences,
O what a spirit should it raise in us! O what a resolution
and expression of our manhood, to resist and banish out of
us this “evil heart of unbelief !’? What an hatred should it Heb. iii.
work in our bowels, what a reluctancy, what an indignation, as
what a revenge against the fruit of our bosom, which hath
so long grown and thrived within us, only to our destruction !
which is provided as it were to eat our souls, as an harbinger
to prepare a place within us for the worm in hell, where it
may lie and bite and gnaw at ease eternally! It is an ex-
amination that will deserve the most precious minute of our
lives, the solemnest work of our souls, the carefulest muster
of our faculties, to shrift and winnow, and even set our hearts
upon the rack, to see whether any fruit or seed of infidelity
lurk in it; and in a matter of this danger to prevent God’s
inquest by our own, to display every thing to ourselves, just
as it shall be laid open before God in judgment, γυμνὸν καὶ Heb. iv. 13.
τετραχηλισμένον, naked and discernible as the entrails of a
creature cut down the back, where the very method of nature
in its secrecies is betrayed tothe eye. I say, to cut ourselves
up, and to search into every cranny of our souls, every wind-
ing of either our understanding or affections; and observe
whether any infidel thought, any infidel lust be lodged there:
and when we have found this execrable thing which hath
brought all our plagues on us, then must we purge, and
cleanse, and lustrate the whole city for its sake: and with
more ceremony than ever the heathen used, even with a
superstition of daily, hourly prayers, and sacrificing ourselves
to God, strive and struggle, and offer violence to remove this
2 Kings
xxiii. 12.
John xviii.
iL
Ps, ὉσΣ. ἢ:
[Is. Ixv.
2. ]
John xix.
19.
2 Cor. v.
20.
504 SERMON XXIII.
unclean thing out of our coasts ; use these unbelieving hearts
of ours, as Josiah did the altars of Ahaz, “ break them down,
beat them to powder, and cast the dust of them into the
brook Kidron ;” that Cedron which Christ passed over when
He went to suffer, even that brook which “Christ drank of
by the way.” And there indeed is there a remedy for infi-
delity, if the infidel will throw it in. If he will put it off, be
it never so dyed in the contempt of Christ’s blood, that very
blood shall cleanse it: and therefore
In the next place, let us labour for faith; let not His
hands be stretched out any longer upon the cross to a
faithless and stubborn generation. It were a piece of igno-
rance that a scholar would abhor to be guilty of, not to be
able to understand that inscription written by Pilate in
either of three languages, “ Jesus of Nazareth, King.” Nay
for all the Gospels and comments written on it, both by
His disciples and His works, still to be non-proficients, this
would prove an accusation written in marble, nay, an ex-
probration above a στηλιτευτικόν. In a word, Christ is still
offered and the proclamation not yet outdated, His sufferings
in the Scripture proposed to every one of you to lay hold on,
and His ministers sent as ‘“ ambassadors beseeching you to be
reconciled,” and more than that, in the Sacrament of the Eu-
charist, His body and blood set before our eyes to be felt and
gazed on, and then even a Didymus would believe; nay, to
be divided amongst us, and put in our mouths, and then
who would be so sluggish as to refuse to feed on Him in his
heart ?
For your election from the beginning to this gift of faith,
let that never raise any doubt or scruple in you, and foreslow
that coming to Him; this is a jealousy that hath undone
many, in a resolvedness that if they are not elected, all their
faith shall prove unprofitable. Christ that bids thee repent,
believe,and come unto Him, is not so frivolous to command im-
possibilities, nor so cruel to mock our impotence. Thou mayest
believe, because He bids: believe, and then thou mayest be
sure thou wert predestinated to believe; and then all the de-
crees in the world cannot deny thee Christ, if thou art thus
resolved to have Him. If thou wilt not believe, thou hast re-
probated thyself, and who is to be accused that thou art not
SERMON XXIII. 505
saved? But if thou wilt come in, there is sure entertainment
for thee. He that begins in God’s counsels, and never thinks
fit to go about any evangelical duty, till he can see his name
writ in the Book of life, must not begin to believe till he be
in heaven; for there only is that to be read radio recto. The
surer course is to follow the Scripture; to hope comfortably
every one of ourselves, to use the means, apprehend the mer-
cies, and then to be confident of the benefits of Christ’s suf-
fering: and this is the way to make our election sure, to read
it in ourselves radio reflexo, by knowing that we believe, to
resolve that we are elected; thereby “we know that we are 1 John iii,
past from death to life, if we love the brethren.” And so is !*
it also of faith; for these are inseparable graces. So Psalm Ps. xxv.
xxv. 14; Prov. iii. 32, God’s secret and His covenant, being eta
taken for His decree, is said to be “with them that fear Him,”
and to be “shewed to them,” i. 6. their very fearing of God is
an evidence to them that they are His elect, with whom He
hath entered covenant. Our faith is the best argument, or
κριτήριον, by which to make a judgment to God’s decree
concerning us. I say, if we will believe God hath elected
us; it is impossible any true faith should be refused upon
pretence the person was predestined to destruction; and if
it were possible, yet would I hope that God’s decrees—were
they as absolute as some would have them—should sooner be
softened into mercy, than that mercy purchased by His Son,
should ever fail to any that believes. The bargain was made,
the covenant struck, and the immutability of the Persian laws
are nothing to it, that “ whosoever believeth in Him should John iii.
not perish, but have everlasting life.’ Wherefore, in brief, !*
let us attend the means, and let what will or can come of the
end; Christ is offered to every soul here present to be a Jesus,
only do thou accept of Him, and thou art past from death
to life; there is no more required of thee, but only to take
Him; if thou art truly possessor of Him, He will justify, He
will humble, He will sanctify thee; He will work all reforma-
tion in thee: and in time seal thee up to the day of re-
demption: only be careful that thou mistakest not His per-
son; thou must receive Him, as well as His promises; thou
must take Him as a Lord and King, as well as a Saviour,
and be content to be a subject, as well as a saint. He is
[Ps. xev.
8.]
Pe: ii. 12:
506 SERMON XXIII.
now proclaimed in your ears, and you must not foreslow the
audience, or procrastinate ; “ To-day if you will hear His voice,
harden not your hearts.” He holds Himself out on purpose
to you, and by the minister woos you to embrace Him: and
then it nearly concerns you not to provoke so true, so hearty,
nay, even so passionate a friend: if He be not kissed He
will be angry. Lastly, if in this business of believing so vul-
garly exposed, there yet appear some difficulties in the prac-
tice, to be overcome before it prove a possible duty: if self-
denial be incompatible with flesh and blood; if delights and
worldly contentments, if an hardened heart in sin, and a
world of high imaginations, refuse to submit or humble
themselves to the poverty of Christ; if we cannot empty
our hands to lay hold, or unbottom ourselves to lean wholly
on Christ, then must we fly, and pray to that Spirit of power,
to subdue, and conquer, and lead us captive to itself, to in-
struct us in the baseness, the nothingness, nay, the dismal,
hideous wretchedness of our own estate, that so being spiri-
tually shaken and terrified out of our carnal pride and secu-
rity, we may come trembling and quaking to that throne of
grace, and with the hands of faith, though feeble ones, with
the eye of faith, though dimly, with a hearty sincere resign-
ing up of ourselves, we may see and apprehend, and fasten,
and be united to our Saviour: that we may live in Christ,
and Christ in us, and having begun in the life of grace here,
we may hope and attain to be accomplished with that of
glory hereafter.
“Now to Him which hath elected us,” &c.
SERMON XXIV.
Acts xvi. 30.
And the times of this ignorance God winked at, but now
commandeth all men every where to repent.
Tue words in our English translation carry somewhat in
the sound, which doth not fully reach the importance of the
original, and therefore it must be the task of our preface not
to connect the text, but clear it; not to shew its dependence
on the precedent words, but to restore it to the integrity of
itself, that so we may perfectly conceive the words, before we
venture to discuss them; that we may ὑποτυπῶσαι πρῶτον,
ὕστερον ἀναγράφειν, as Aristotle* phrases it, “ first represent
them to you in the bulk, then describe them particularly in
their several lineaments.” Our English setting of the words
seems to make two propositions, and in them a direct opposi-
tion betwixt the condition of the ancient and present Gen-
tiles ; that God had winked at, 1. 6. either approved, or pitied,
or pardoned the ignorance of the former heathens, but now
was resolved to execute justice on all that did continue in
that was heretofore pardonable in them, on every one every
where that did not repent. Now the original runs thus,
TOUS μὲν οὖν χρόνους THY ἀγνοίας ὑπεριδὼν ὁ Θεὸς, τὰ νῦν
παραγγέλλει, κ-τ.λ., that is, in a literal construction, “God
therefore passing over the times of ignorance, as if He saw
them not, doth now command all men every where to re-
pent.” Which you may conceive thus, by this kind of vulgar
ἀνάβασις, or sensible proceeding in God. God always is,
essentially and perfectly, every one of His attributes, wisdom,
justice, mercy, &c., but yet is said at one time to be peculi-
a (Eth. Nicom., i. c. 7. ]
508 SERMON XXIV.
arly one attribute, at another time another, i.e. to be at one
time actually just, at another time actually merciful, accord-
ing to His determination to the object. As when God fixes
His eyes upon a rebellious people, whose sins are ripe for His
justice, He then executes His vengeance on them as on
Sodom: when He fixes His eyes upon a penitent, believing
people, He then doth exercise His mercy, as on Nineveh.
Now when God looks upon any part of the lapsed world on
which He intends to have mercy, He suffers not His eye to
be fixed or terminated on the medium betwixt His eye and
them, on the sins of all their ancestors from the beginning
of the world till that day; but having another account to
cal] them to, doth for the present, ὑπεριδεῖν, ὑπερβλέπειν,
ὑπερορᾷν, “look over all them,” as if they were not in His
way, and imputing not the sins of the fathers to the children,
fixeth on the children, makes His covenant of mercy with
them, and commandeth them the condition of this covenant,
whereby they shall obtain mercy, that is, “every one every
where to repent.” So that in the first place, ὑπεριδὼν παρ-
ἀγγέλλει must not be rendered by way of opposition, “ He
winked then, but now commands,” as if their former igno-
rance were justifiable, and an account of knowledge should
only be exacted from us. And in the second place, ὑπεριδὼν,
a word read but this once in all the New Testament, must be
rendered, not “ winking at,” but “looking over,” or not in-
sisting upon; as when we fix our eyes upon a hill we suffer
them not to dwell on the valley on this side of it, because
we look earnestly on the hill. Nowif this be not the common
Attical acception of it, yet it will seem agreeable to the pen-
ning of the New Testament, in which whosoever will observe,
may find words and phrases which perhaps the Attic purity,
perhaps grammar, will not approve of. And yet I doubt not
but classic authorities may be brought where ὑπεριδεῖν shall
signify, not a winking, or not taking notice of, but a looking
further, a not resting in this, but a driving higher, for so it -
is rendered by Stephanus, ad ulteriora oculos convertere, and
then the phrase shall be as proper as the sense, the Greek as
authentical as the doctrine, that God looking over and not
insisting upon the ignorance of the former heathen, at Christ’s
coming entered a covenant with their successors, the condi-
EEE
|
|
|
SERMON XXIV. 509
tion of which was, “that every man every where should
repent.”
And this is made good by the Greek Scholia of the New
Testament, οὐ τοῦτό φησιν", «.7.r., “that is spoken, not that
the former heathen should be unpunished, but that their
successors to whom St. Paul preached, if they would repent,
should not be called to an account of their ignorance,” should
not fare the worse for the ignorance of their fathers; and at
this drives also Chrysostom®, out of whom the scholiasts may
seem to have borrowed it, their whole ἐξήγησις being but
ἔκλεκτα, gleanings out of the fathers before them. I might
further prove the necessity of this interpretation if it were re-
quired of me: and thus far I have stayed you to prove it,
because our English is somewhat imperfect in the expression
‘of it. Avo κύβοι οὐκ εἰσὶ κύβος, saith Aristotle, “Two cubes
are not a cube,” but another figure very different from it:
and indeed our English translations by making two proposi-
tions of this verse, have varied the native single proposition
in that regard, and made it unlike itself, which briefly—if I
can inform myself aright—should run thus, by way of one
simple enunciation; ‘God therefore not insisting on, but
looking over those times of ignorance, doth now command all
men every where to repent ; of which those three lines in
Leo’s* fourth sermon de Passione Domini are a just para-
phrase, Nos sub veteris ignorantie profunda nocte pereuntes,
in patriarcharum societatem, et fortem electi gregis adoptavit.
So then the words being represented to you in this scheme
or single diagram, are the covenant of mercy made with the
progeny of ignorant heathens, upon condition of repentance,
in which you may observe two grand parallel lines, 1, the
ignorance of the heathen, such as in the justice of God might
have provoked Him to have pretermitted the whole world of
succeeding Gentiles: 2, the mercy of God, not imputing their
ignorance to our charge, whosoever every where to the end
of the world shall repent. And first of the first, the ignorance
of the heathen in these words, τοὺς μὲν οὖν χρόνους, “the
times,” &c.
> [Gicumenius Ennarrat in loc. et Op., tom. ix. p. 291. C, D.]
Op., tom, i. p. 139. Paris. 1631. ] 4 [S. Leo. Serm. lv. de Passione
© [In Acta Apostol. Hom. xxxviii, Domini, iv. cap. 5. Op., tom.i. p. 210.]
510 SERMON XXIV.
If for the clearing of this bill we should begin our inquest
at Japhet the father of the Gentiles, examine them all by
their gradations, we should in the general find the evidence
to run thus; 1. that they were absolutely ignorant, as igno-
rance is opposed to learning; 2. ignorant in the affairs of
God, as ignorance is opposed to piety or spiritual wisdom ;
3. ignorant supinely, perversely, and maliciously, as it is op-
posed to a simple or more excusable ignorance.
Their absolute ignorance or ἀπαιδευσία, their want of
learning is at large proved by St. Austin xviii. de Civ. Dei,
Eusebius Prepar. x., Clemens in his Protrep. and others, —
some of whose writings to this purpose—because it is easier
for my auditors to believe me in gross, than to be troubled
with the retail—is this, that the beginnings of learning in all
kinds was among the Jews, whilst the whole heathen world be-
sides was barbarously ignorant ; that Moses appointed masters
among the tribes, γραμμάτων εἰςαγωγεῖς, which initiated the
youth of Israel] in all kind of secular learning; or if you will
believe Patricius® and his proofs, that Shem erected, and after-
wards Heber enlarged, scholas doctrinarum, schools or semi-
naries of learning, where learning was professed and taught ;
that Abraham, as Eusebius cites Nic. Damascenus! for it, was
excellent in the mathematics, and dispersed and communi-
cated his knowledge in Chaldea, from whence the Egyptians,
and from them the Grecians came to them; that Enoch was
probably judged by Polyhistor® to be that Atlas to whom the
heathen imputed the beginning of astronomy; that in the
sum, all learning was primitive among the Hebrews, and
from them, by stealth and filching, some seeds of it sown in
Phenicia, Egypt, and at last in Greece. For they make it
plain by computation, that Moses,—who yet was long after
Enoch, and Shem, and Heber, and Abraham, all in confesso
great scholars,—that Moses, I say, was fifteen hundred years
ancienter than the Greek philosophers, that all the learning
that is found and bragged of amongst the Grecians—whose
ignorance my text chiefly deals with, St. Paul’s discourse
here being addressed to the Athenians—was but a babe of a
© Zoroaster, p. 4. s [Ap. Euseb., ibid., lib. ix. p. 419
τ [Nicol. Damascenus, ap. Euseb., d.]_
Prepar. Evang., lib. ix. p. 417 d.]
————— eet
>
ee
ee ee 18
ὦ. =
-Ὶ-
SERMON XXIV. 511
day old in respect of the true antiquity of learning: that all
their philosophy was but scraps, ἀποσπασμάτια, which fell
from the Jews’ tables; that in their stealth they were very
imprudent, gleaned only that which was not worth carrying
away, οὐδὲν ἢ πρὸς Θεὸν, ἢ πρὸς σώφρονα βίον, x.T.r., stuffed
their sacks, which they carried into Egypt to buy food, only
with some unprofitable chaff, with empty speculations that
would puff up, not fill or nourish the soul, but brought no
valuable real commodity away with them, whereby they might
improve their knowledge, or reform their manners; upon
which two grounds, 1. the vanity and unprofitableness of their
learning ; 2. the novelty of it in respect of the Hebrews from
whom they stole it afar off; they are not thought worthy of
the title of scholars; and forall the noise of their philosophy,
are yet judged absolutely ignorant, as ignorance is opposed
to learning.
In the second place, for their ignorance in the affairs of
God, their own author’s examination will bring in a sufficient
evidence. If you will sort out the chiefest names of learned
men amongst them, you will there find the veriest dunces in
this learning. The deipnosophists, the only wits of the time,
are yet described by Athenzus to employ their study only
how to get good cheer a free cost, ἀοιδοὶ αἰὲν ἄκαπνα θύο-
μεν ἢ, they fed deliciously, and yet were at no charge for the
provision; and amongst them you shall scarcely find any
knowledge or worship of even their heathen gods, but only
in drinking, where their luxury had this excuse or pretence
of religion, that it was δεῖγμα τῆς δυνάμεως τοῦ Θεοῦ ἀγαθοῦ,
“an experiment of the power of that good God” which had
provided such a creature as wine for them to abuse; which
perhaps a drunken Romish casuist stole from them, where
he allows of drinking supra modum, ad glorificandum Deum,
§c., “to the glorifying of God,” creator of so excellent a
creature, which hath the effect in it of turning men into
beasts. So that it seems by the story of them in brief, that
the deipnosophists, men of the finest, politest conceits, as
Ulpianus Tyrius, Calliphanes, and the like in Athenzeus, in
the multitude of the Grecian gods had but one deity, and
that was their belly, which they worshipped religioso luxu,
» [ Lib. i. c. 14. p. 8 E. ed. Casaub. ]
512 SERMON XXIV.
not singing, but eating and drinking praises to his name;
to this add the Sophistz, Protagoras, Hippias, and the like
great boasters of learning in Socrates’s time, and much
followed by the youth, till he persuaded them from admiring
such unprofitable professors, and these are observed by Plu-
tarch, to be mere hucksters of vainglory; getting great
store of money and applause from their auditors, ἀργύριον καὶ
οἴημα, “silver and popularity,” but had no manner of profit-
able learning to bestow upon them, as Plutarch dooms them
in his Platonic Questions‘, and Socrates in his Dialogues in
confutation of them; and certainly by their very profession
it is plain that these men had no God to know or worship,
except their gain. But not to insist on these or other their
professors of more curious, trim, polite learning, as their
philosophers, grammarians, and rhetoricians, it will be more
seasonable to our text to examine St. Paul’s auditors here,
the great speculators among them: 1. the deepest philoso-
phers, and there where you expect the greatest knowledge
you shall find the most barbarous ignorance ; in the midst
of the πολυθεότης of the Grecians, the philosophers (saith
Clement *, and it is plain by their writings,) finding out and
acknowledging in private this multitude of gods to be a pro-
digious vanity, and infinitely below the gravity and wisdom
of their profession, took themselves off from this unreason-
able worship, and almost each of them in private worshipped
some one God. And here you would think that they jumped
with the Jews of that time, in the acknowledging an unity:
but if you mark them you shall find that they did not reform
the popular atheism, but only varied it into a more rational
way. Thales would not acknowledge Neptune, as the poets
and people did, but yet he deifies the water as Clement! ob-
serves: another scorned to be so senseless as to worship wood
or stone, and yet he deifies the earth, the parent of them
both, and as senseless as them both; and does at once cal-
care terram et colere, “tread on the earth with his feet, and
adore it with his heart.” So Socrates,—who by bringing in
morality was a great refiner and pruner of barren philosophy,—
i [Platonice Questiones, Quest. i. 5. sq.]
Op., tom. x. p. 160. Reiske. } ' [Id., Ibid. ]
{Clemens Alex. Protrept., cap.
SERMON XXLY. 5138
absolutely denying the Grecian gods, and thence called
ἄθεος, is yet brought in by Aristophanes™, worshipping the
clouds, ὦ δέσποτ᾽ ἀὴρ, x.7-r., and by a more friendly historian
described addressing a sacrifice to Asculapius", being at the
point of death. So that in brief, the philosophers, disliking
the vulgar superstition, went to school, saith Clement?, to the
Persian magi, and of them learnt a more scholastic atheism.
The worship of those venerable elements, which because they
were the beginnings out of which natural bodies were com-
posed, were by these naturalists admired and worshipped
instead of the God of nature. From which a man may
plainly judge of the beginning and ground of the general
atheism of philosophers, that it was a superficial knowledge
of philosophy, the sight of second causes and dwelling on
them, and being unable to go any higher. For men by
nature being inclined to acknowledge a Deity, take that to
be their God which is the highest in their sphere of know-
_ ledge; or the supremum cognitum which they have attained
to ; whereas if they had been studious, or able by the depend-
ence of causes to have proceeded beyond these elements, they
might possibly, nay, certainly would have been reduced to
piety and religion, which is εὐσέβεια, θεοσέβεια, “the know-
ledge and worship of God ;” but there were many hindrances
which kept them grovelling on the earth, not able to ascend this
ladder. 1. They wanted that οἰκεία εὐεξία τῆς ψυχῆς, which
Aphrodisiensis’ on the Topics speaks of, that kindly, fami-
liar good temper, or disposition of the soul, καθ᾽ ἣν εὑρετική τε
ἀληθοῦς καὶ κριτική ἐστι; “ by which the mind is able to find
out-and judge of truth ; they wanted either that natural har-
mony, or spiritual concord of the powers of the soul, by which
it is able to reach those things which now in corrupt nature
are only spiritually discerned. For it is Clement’s4 Chris-
tian judgment of them, that the Gentiles being but bastards,
not true-born sons of God, but aliens from the common- [Eph. ii.
wealth of Israel, were therefore not able to look up toward 12:
the light, (as it is observed of the bastard-brood of eagles,) or
m Nub. 264. P (Alex. Aphrodis. in Aristot. To-
» (Cf. Plato, Phzed. ad fin.} pica, f. 17.]
* [Clemens Alex. Protrept., § 64. p. 4 [Clemens Alex. Protrept., ch. x.
57, ed. Potter. | § 92. p. 75. ed. Pott. j
HAMMOND. 1: l
514 SERMON XXIV.
consequently to discern that inaccessible light, till they were
received into the covenant, and made τέκνα φῶτος γνήσια,
true proper “children of light.” A second hindrance was
the grossness and earthiness of their fancy, which was not
able to conceive God to be any thing but a corporeous sub-
stance, as Philoponus observes in his Scholia on the books
de anima", ὅταν θέλωμεν, κιτιλ. “ When we have a mind to
betake ourselves to divine speculation,” our fancy comes in,
καὶ θόρυβον κινεῖ, “raises such a tempest” in us, so many
earthly meteors to clog and over-cloud the soul, that it can-
not but conceive the Deity under some bodily shape, and this
disorder of the fancy doth perpetually attend the soul, even
in the fairest weather, in its greatest calm and serenity of
affections, ὅταν σχολὴν, K.T.r., Saith Plato, even when the
soul is free from its ordinary distractions, and hath provided
itself most accurately for contemplation. Philoponus in this
place finding this inconvenience, fetches a remedy out of
Plotinus for this rarifying and purifying of the fancy, and it
is the study of the mathematics, ἀγέσθωσαν νέοι, x.7.r., “ Let
young men be brought up in the study of the mathematics,”
to some acquaintance with an incorporeous nature; but
how unprofitable a remedy this study of the mathematics
was, to the purpose of preparing the soul to a right conceit
of God, I doubt not but he himself afterwards found, when
he turned Christian, and saw how far their mathematical
and metaphysical abstractions fell below those purest theolo-
gical conceits, of which only grace could make him capable.
So that in brief their understanding being fed by their
fancies, and both together fattened with corporeous phan-
tasms, as they increased in natural knowledge, grew more
hardened in spiritual ignorance, and as Clement® saith of
them, were like birds crammed in a coop; fed in darkness and
nourished for death: their gross conceits groping on in ob-
scurity, and furnishing them only with such opinions of God,
as should increase both their ignorance and damnation.
That I bé not too large and confused in this discourse, let us
pitch upon Aristotle, one of the latest of the ancient philoso-
phers, not above three hundred and forty years before Christ,
* [Philoponus, Comment. in Aristot. 5. [Clemens Alex. Protrept., ch. x.
De Anima, ff. 1, 2. ed. Aldus. ] § 113. p. 87. (ad fin.) Potter. |
SERMON XXIV. 515
who therefore seeing the vanities, and making use of the
helps of all the Grecian learning, may probably be judged to
have as much knowledge of God as any heathen ; and indeed
the Cologne divines had such an opinion of his skill and ex-
pressions that way, that in their tract of Aristotle’s Salvation,
they define him to be Christ’s precursor in naturalibus, as
John Baptist was in gratuitis. But in brief, if we examine
him, we shall find him much otherwise, as stupid in the
affairs of 1. God, 2. the soul, 3. happiness, as any of his fel-
low Gentiles. If the book περὶ κόσμου were his own legiti-
mate work, a man might guess that he saw something, though
he denied the particular providence of the Deity, and that he
acknowledged His omnipotence, though he would not be so
bold with Him as to let Him be busied in the producing of every
particular sublunary effect. The man might seem somewhat
tender of God, as if being but newly come acquainted with
Him he were afraid to put Him to too much pains, as judging
it μηδὲ καλὸν, K.T.r., “neither comely nor befitting the majesty
of a God to interest Himself in every action upon earth +” It
might seem areverence and awe which made him provide the
same course for God, which he.saw used in the courts of Susa
and Ecbatana, where the king, saith he, lived invisible in his
palace, and yet by his officers, as through prospectives and
otacoustics, saw and heard all that was done in his domini-
ons. But this book being not of the same complexion with
the rest of his philosophy, is shrewdly guessed to be a spu-
rious issue of later times, entitled to Aristotle and translated
by Apuleius, but not owned by its brethren, the rest of his
books of philosophy ; for even in the Metaphysics "—where he
is at his wisest—he censures Xenophanes for a clown for look-
ing up to heaven, and affirming that there was one God there,
the cause of all things, and rather than he will credit him he
commends Parmenides for a subtle fellow, who said nothing
at all, or I am sure to no purpose.
Concerning his knowledge of the soul, it is Philoponus’ *
observation of him, that he persuades only the more under-
standing, laborious, judicious sort to be his auditors in that
τ [Pseud-Aristot. De Mundo, c. 6.1 1. cap. 1. ad init. Cf. also Schol. on the
" [Aristot. Metaph. A. c, ὅ.} Categories, p. 36. b. ed. Berlin. ]
* (Cf. Com. in Aristot. de Anima, lib.
Tale?
516 SERMON XXIV.
subject, τοὺς δὲ ῥᾳθυμοτέρους ἀποτρέπει, K.T.r., but de-
horts men of meaner vulgar parts, less intent to their study,
from meddling at all with this science about the soul, for he
plainly tells them in his first de anima, it is too hard for any
ordinary capacity, and yet in the first of the Metaphysics’ he
defines the wise man to be one who besides his own accu-
rate knowledge of hard things, as the causes of the soul, &c.,
is also able to teach any body else, who hath such an habit of
knowledge, and such a command over it, that he can make
any auditor understand the abstrusest mystery in it. So
then out of his own words he is convinced to have had no
skill, no wisdom in the business of the soul, because he could
not explain nor communicate this knowledge to any but choice
auditors. The truth is, these were but shifts of pride, and
ambitious pretences to cloak a palpable ignorance, under the
habit of mysterious, deep, speculation: when, alas, poor man !
all that which he knew, or wrote of the soul, was scarce worth
learning, only enough to confute his fellow ignorant philoso-
phers, to puzzle others, to puff himself; but to profit, instruct,
or edify none.
In the third place, concerning happiness, he plainly be-
wrays himself to be a coward, not daring to meddle with
divinity. For’ being probably given to understand, or rather
indeed plainly convinced, that if any thing in the world were,
then happiness must likely be θεόσδοτος, “the gift of God”
bestowed on men, yet he there staggers at it, speaks scepti-
cally, and not so magisterially as he is wont, dares not be so
bold as to define it: and at last does not profess his igno-
rance, but takes a more honourable course, and puts it off to
some other place to be discussed. Where Andronicus Rho-
dius’ Greek paraphrase tells us he meant his tract περὶ προ-
νοίας, “about Providence :” but in all Laertius’ catalogue of
the multitude of his writings we find no such title, and I much
suspect by his other carriages, that the man was not so valiant
as to deal with any so unwieldy a subject as the providence
would have proved. Sure I am he might, if he had hada
mind to it, have quitted himself of his engagements, and
seasonably enough have defined the fountain of happiness
y [Aristot. Metaph. A.c. 2.] * (Id., Eth. Nicom., lib. i. ὁ. 10.]
SERMON XXIV. 517
there, in Ethics, but in c, 11* it appears that it was no pre-
termission, but ignorance; not a care of deferring it to a
fitter place, but a necessary silence where he was not able to
speak. For there mentioning happiness and miserableness
after death,—where he might have shewed his skill if he had
any,—he plainly betrays himself an arrant naturalist in de-
fining all the felicity and misery “to be the good or ill proof
of their friends and children left behind them,” which are to
them being dead, happiness or miseries, ἄλλ᾽ οὐκ αἰσθανο-
μένοις, “of which they are not any way sensible.” By what
hath been spoken it is plain that the heathen never looked after
God of their own accord, but as they were driven upon Him
by the necessity of their study, which from the second causes
necessarily lead them in a chain to some view of the first mover,
and then some of them, either frighted with the light, or de-
spairing of their own abilities, were terrified and discouraged
from any further search; some few others sought after Him,
but, as Aristotle saith the geometer doth after a right line”,
only, ὡς θεατὴς τἀληθοῦς, “as a contemplator of truth,”
but not as the knowledge of it is any way useful or condu-
cible to the ordering or bettering of their lives; they had
an itching desire to know the Deity, but neither to apply it
as arule to their actions, nor to order their actions to His
glory. For generally whensoever any action drove them on
any subject which intrenched on divinity, you shall find
them more flat than ordinary, not handling it according to
any manner of accuracy, or sharpness, but only ἐφ᾽ ὅσον οἰ-
κεῖον τῇ μεθόδῳ, “ only as much use or as little as their study
in the search of things constrained them to,” and then for
the most part they fly off abruptly, as if they were glad to be
quit of so cumbersome a subject. Whence Aristotle observes °,
that the whole tract de causis was obscurely and inartificially
handled by the ancients, and if sometimes they spake to the
purpose, it was as unskilful, unexercised fencers τύπτουσι κα-
Aas πληγὰς, they lay on, and sometimes strike a lucky blow or
two, but more by chance than skill, sometimes letting fall from
their pens those truths which never entered their understand-
ings, as Theophilus ad Autolycum* observes of Homer and
ἃ (Ibid. lib. 1. ο. 1
1.1 « [Id., Metaph. Δ. c. 4.7
» (Ibid., lib. ic. 7.]
1 [ἤτοι yap of ποιηταὶ, Ὅμηρος δὴ καὶ
518 SERMON XXIV.
Hesiod, that being inspired by their muses, i.e. the devil,
spake according to that spirit lies and fables, and exact
atheism, and yet sometimes would stumble upon a truth of
divinity, as men possessed with devils did sometimes confess
Christ, and the evil spirits being adjured by His name, came
out and confessed themselves to be devils. Thus it is plain
out of the philosophers and heathen discourses, 1. of God,
2. the soul, 3. happiness, that they were also ignorant, as
ignorance is opposed to piety or spiritual wisdom, which was
to be proved by way of premise in the second place.
Now in the third place, for the guilt of their ignorance,
that it was a perverse, gross, malicious, and inexcusable igno-
rance, you shall briefly judge. Aristotle * being elevated above
ordinary in his discourse about wisdom, confesses the know-
ledge of God to be the best knowledge and most honourable
of all, but of no manner of use or necessity ; ἀναγκαιότεραι,
x.T.r., “no knowledge is better than this, yet none more un-
necessary,” as if the evidence of truth made him confess the
nobility of this wisdom, but his own supine, stupid, perverse
resolutions made him contemn it as unnecessary. But that
I may not charge the accusation too hard upon Aristotle
above others, and take as much pains to damn him as the
Cologne divines did to save him, we will deal more at large, as
Aristotle prescribes his wise men‘, and rip up to you the in-
excusableness of the heathen ignorance in general: 1. by the
authority of Clemens’, who is guessed to be one of their kind-
est patrons in his προτρεπτικὸς, where having cited many testi-
monies out of them, concerning the unity, he concludes thus,
εἰ yap, «.7.r., “Seeing that the heathen had some sparks of
the divine truth,” some gleanings out of the written word, and
yet make so little use of it as they do, they do, saith he, “ shew
the power of God’s word to have been revealed to them, and
accuse their own weakness that they did not improve it to the
end for which it was sent ;” that they increased it not into a
saving knowledge; where (by the way) the word weakness is
used by Clement by way of softening, or mercy, as here the
Apostle useth ignorance, when he might have said impiety.
Ἡσίοδος, ὥς φασιν, ὑπὸ μουσῶν ἐμπνευ- e ΓΑτβίοί. Metaph. A. ο. 2.]
σθέντες, φαντασίᾳ καὶ πλάνῃ ἐλάλησαν, f f Ibid.
καὶ ov καθαρῷ πνεύματι, ἀλλὰ TAGY@.— [Clemens Alex. Protrept., ¢, vii.
Theophilus 11. 8. [ad cale. S. Justini, ὃ 74. p. 64. ]
p. 354, C. Paris. 1742.]
SERMON XXIV. 519
For sure if the accusation run thus, that the word of God was
revealed to them, and yet they made no use of it, as it doth
here in Clemens, the sentence then upon this must needs con-
clude them, not only ἀσθενεῖς, “ weak,” but perverse contem-
ners of the light of Scripture. Again, the philosophers them-
selves confess that ignorance is the nurse, nay, mother of all im-
piety: πάντα ὅσα πράττουσιν)", x.T.X., “whatsoever an ignorant
man or fool doth, is unholy and wicked necessarily ;” ignorance
being μανίας εἶδος, “a species of madness,” and no madman
being capable of any sober action ; so that if their ignorance
were in the midst of means of knowledge, then must it be
perverse; if it had an impure influence upon all their actions,
then was it malicious and full of guilt. 2. Their chief ground
that sustained and continued their ignorance, proves it to be
not blind but affected, which ground you shall find by the
heathen objection in Clemens’, to be a resolution not to change
the religion of their fathers. It is an unreasonable thing,
say the heathens, which they will never be brought to, to
change the customs bequeathed to them by their ancestors.
From whence the father solidly concludes, that there was not
any means in nature which could make the Christian religion
contemned and hated, but only this pestilent custom, of never
altering any customs or laws, though never so unreasonable ;
ov yap ἐμισήθη, K.T.r., “it is not possible that ever any na-
tion should hate and fly from this greatest blessing that ever
was bestowed upon mankind,” to wit, the knowledge and wor-
ship of God, unless being carried on by custom they resolved
to go the old way to hell, rather than to venture on a new
path to heaven. Hence it is that Athenagoras * in his Treaty
with Commodus for the Christians, wonders much that among
so many laws made yearly in Rome, there was not one enacted
μὴ στέργειν τὰ πάτρια κἄν γέλοια ἢ), “ that men should forsake
the customs of their fathers, which were any way absurd.”
From whence he falls straight to their absurd deities’, as if it
being made lawful to relinquish ridiculous customs, there
would be no plea left for their ridiculous gods. So Eusebius™,
» [Clemens Alex. Protrept., c. xii. init., ὃ 1.]
§ 122. p. 94. Pott.] 'TIbid., § 1.]
i [Ibid., 6. x. ad init., p. 73. ad fin. m (Eusebius Prep. Evang., lib. ii.
Tertull. Apol. ] p. 74. C.]
* [ Athenag. Leg. pro Christianis, ad
Acts xvii.
18.
Acts xvi.
PHIIE
520 SERMON XXIV.
Prep., lib. 11., makes the cause of the continuance of super-
stition to be, that no man dared to move those things which
ancient custom of the country had authorized; and so also in
his fourth book", where to bring in Christianity was accounted
κινεῖν τὰ ἀκίνητα, “to change things that were fixed,” καὶ
πολυπραγμονεῖν, K.T.r., “and to be pragmatical,” friends of
innovation ; and so it is plain they esteemed St. Paul, and
hated him in that name, as an innovator, because he preached
unto.them “Jesus and the resurrection,” Acts xvii. 18. So
Acts xvi. 21, St. Paul is said to teach “ customs which were
not lawful for them to receive nor observe, being Romans,”
because, saith Casaubon out of Dio, it was not lawful
for the Romans to innovate any thing in religion, for saith
Dio®, “this bringing in of new gods will bring in new laws
with it.” So that if—as hath been proved—their not ac-
knowledging of the true God was grounded upon a perverse
resolution not to change any custom of their fathers, either
in opinion or practice, though never so absurd, then was the
ignorance—or as St. Paul might have called it, the idolatry —
of those times, impious, affected ; not a natural blindness, but
a pertinacious winking; not a simple deafness, but a resolved
stubbornness not to hear the voice of the charmer; which we
might further prove by shewing you, thirdly, how their learn-
ing or πολυμαθία, which might be proved an excellent prepa-
rative to religion, their philosophy, which was to them as the
law to the Jews, by their using of it to a perverse end, grew
ordinarily very pernicious to them. 4. How that those which
knew most, and were at the top of profane knowledge, did
then fall most desperately headlong into atheism; as Hippo-
crates observes, that ἀθλητικὴ ἕξις, and St. Basil”, that ἡ ἐπ’
ἄκρον εὐεξία, “the most perfect constitution of body,” so of
the soul, is most dangerous, if not sustained with good care
and wisdom. 5. How they always forged lies to scandal the
people of God, as Manetho the famous Egyptian historian
saith, that Moses and the Jews were banished out of Egypt,
διὰ λέπραν, “because of an infectious leprosy” that over-
spread the Jews, as Theophilus@ cites it, and Justin out of
bid., lib. iv. p. 130. C.] hom. ix. Op., tom. i. p. 83. D.]
sf. supr., p. 380. ] a Theophilus ad Autolye., lib. iii.
n [1
ο [ (
Ρ [S. Basil. Cf. e.g. In Hexameron, ὃ 21. [p. 392. E, sq. ad cale. S. Just.}
SERMON XXIV. 521
Trogus", and also Tacitus; and the primitive Christians were
branded and abomined by them for three special faults which
they were little likely to be guilty of: 1. Atheism, 2. Eating
their children, 3. Incestuous, common using of women, as we
find them set down and confuted by Athenagoras in his Treaty
or Apology’, and Theophilus‘, ad Autol. το. 6. By their own
confession, as of Plato to his friend, when he wrote in earn-
est, and secretly acknowledging the unity which he openly
denied against his conscience and the light of reason in
him; and Orpheus the inventor of the πολυθεότης, pro-
fessing and worshipping three hundred and sixty-five gods
all his life-time, at his death left in his will ἕνα εἶναι
θεὸν ", that, however he had persuaded them all the while,
there was indeed but one God. And lastly, how these two
affections in them, admiration and gratitude; admiration
of men of extraordinary worth, and gratitude for more
than ordinary benefactions done either to particular men
or nations, were the chief promoters of idolatry; making
the heathens worship them as gods, whom they were ac-
quainted with, and knew to be but men, as might be proved
variously and at large. If I could insist upon any or each of
these, it would be most evident, what I hope now at last is
proved enough, that the ignorance of those times was not sim-
ple, blind ignorance, but malign, perverse, sacrilegious, affected,
stubborn, wilful*, I had almost said, knowing ignorance in
them; which being the thing we first promised to demonstrate,
we must next make up the proposition which is yet imper-
fect, to wit, that ignorance in these heathen, in God’s jus-
tice, might have provoked Him to have pretermitted the
whole world of succeeding Gentiles, which I must dispatch
only in a word, because I would fain to descend to applica-
tion, which I intended to be the main, but the improvident
expense of my time hath now left only to be the close of
my discourse.
The ignorance of those times being of this composition, both
τ [Justin. xxxvi. 2. Tacit. Hist.v.3.] πέντε θεοὶ, ods αὐτὸς ἐπὶ τέλει τοῦ βίου
5. |Athenag. Leg. pro Christianis, ἀθετεῖ, ed ταῖς διαθήκαις αὐτοῦ λέγων
§ 3. ἕνα εἶναι Oedbv.—bid., lib. iii. § 2. p.
‘ [Theophilus ad Autolyc, lib. iii, 381 C.]
δὲ +, 5. p. 382. E, sq. ] x [S. Chrysost. in Matt. Hom. i. ὃ
“ [ἢ Ὀρφέα οἱ τριακόσιοι ἑξήκοντα 5. Op., tom. vii. p. 10 sq.]
Acts x.
ver. 16.
ver. 15.
ver. 34.
ver. 45.
Eph. iii. 9,
10.
522 SERMON XXIV.
in respect of the superstition of their worship, which was per-
verse, as hath been proved, and the profaneness of their lives,
being abominable even to nature—as might farther be shewed
—is now no longer to be called ignorance, but profaneness,
and a profaneness so epidemical over all the Gentiles, so in-
bred and naturalized among them, that it was even become
their property, radicated in their mythical times, and by con-
tinual succession derived down to them by their generations.
So that if either a natural man with the eye of reason, or a
spiritual man by observation of God’s other acts of justice,
should look upon the Gentiles in that state which they were
in at Christ’s coming, all of them damnable superstitious, or
rather idolatrous in their worship ; all of them damnable pro-
fane in their lives; and which was worse, all of them peremp-
torily resolved, and by a law of homage to the customs of
their fathers necessarily engaged to continue in the road of
damnation; he would certainly give the whole succession of
them over as desperate people, infinitely beyond hopes or
probability of salvation. And this may appear by St. Peter
in the tenth of the Acts, where this very thing, that the Gen-
tiles should be called, was so incredible a mystery, that he
was fain to be cast into a trance, and to receive a vision to
interpret it to his belief: and a first or a second command
could not persuade him “to arise, kill, and eat,” that is, to
preach to Gentiles ; he was still objecting the τὸ κοινὸν καὶ
ἀκάθαρτον, “the profaneness and uncleanness of them.” And
at last, when by the assurance of the Spirit, and the heathen
Cornelius’s discourse with him, he was plainly convinced,
what otherwise he never dreamt possible, that God had a
design of mercy on the Gentiles, he breaks out into a phrase
both of acknowledgment and admiration, “ Of a truth I per-
ceive,” &c.; and that you may not judge it was one single
doctor’s opinion, it is added, “ And they of the circumcision
which believed were astonished, because that on the Gentiles
also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.” Nay, in
the third to the Ephesians, verse 10, it is plain that the call-
ing of the Gentiles was so strange a thing, that the angels
themselves knew not of it till it was effected. “For this
was the mystery which from the beginning of the world
had been hid in God, which was now made known by the
SERMON XXIV. 525
Church to principalities and powers.”’ The brief plain mean-
ing of which hard place is, that by St. Paul’s preaching to
the Gentiles, by this new work done in the Church, to wit,
the calling of the Gentiles, the angels came to understand
somewhat which was before too obscure for them, till it was
explained by the event, and in it the manifold wisdom of
God. And this proposition I might prove to you by many
topics ; 1. by symptoms that their estate was desperate, and
their disease ὀλέθριον κάρτα λίαν, “very, very mortal ;” as
that God, when He would mend a people, He punisheth
them with afflictions, when He intends to stop a current of
impetuous sinners, He lays the axe to the root, in a πανω-
λεθρία or total subversion of them; but when His punish-
ments are spiritual, as they were here, when He strikes nei-
ther with the rod nor with the sword, but makes one sin the
punishment of another, as unnatural lust of idolatry and the
like; when He leaves a nation to itself, and the very judg-
ment laid upon them makes them only less capable of mercy ;
then is it much to be feared that God hath little mercy in-
tended for that people, their desertion being a forerunner of
judgment without mercy. 2. I might prove it ab exemplo,
and that exactly with a nec datur dissimile in Scripture, that
the nine monarchies which the learned observe in Scripture,
were each of them destroyed for idolatry, in which sin the
heathen now received to mercy, surpass all the precedent
world, and for all their many destructions, still uniformly
continued in their provocation. ‘These and the like argu-
ments I purposely omit, as conceiving St. Peter’s vision
mentioned before out of the tenth of the Acts sufficiently
to clear the point, and therefore judging any further en-
largement of proofs superfluous, I hasten with full speed to
application.
And, first, from the consideration of our estate, who being
the offspring of those Gentiles, might in the justice of God
have been left to heathenism, and in all probability, till St.
Peter’s vision discovered the contrary, were likely to have
been pretermitted eternally ; to make this both the motive
and business of our humiliation; for there is such a Christian
duty required of us, for which we ought to set apart some
tithe, or other portion of time, in which we are to call our-
524 SERMON XXIV.
selves to an account for all the general guilts, for all those
more catholic engagements that either our stock, our nation,
the sins of our progenitors back to the beginning of the world,
nay, the common corruption of our nature hath plunged us
in. To pass by that ranker guilt of actual sins,—for which
I trust every man here hath daily some solemn assizes to
arraign himself,—my text will afford us yet some further
indictments; if seventeen hundred years ago our father
were then an Amorite, and mother an Hittite, if we being
then in their loins, were inclosed in the compass of their
idolatry ; and as all in Adam, so besides that we again in
the gentilism of our fathers, were all deeply plunged in a
double common damnation ; how are we to humble ourselves
infinitely above measure; to stretch, and rack, and torture
every power of our souls to its extent, thereby to enlarge
and aggravate the measure of this guilt against ourselves,
which hitherto perhaps we have not taken notice of? There
is not a better μαλακτικὸν in the world, no more powerful
medicine for the softening of the soul, and keeping it in a
Christian tenderness, than this lading it with all the burdens
that its common or private condition can make it capable οἵ;
this tiring of it out, and bringing it down into the dust in the
sense of its spiritual engagements. For it is impossible for
him, who hath fully valued the weight of his general guilts,
each of which hath lead enough to sink the most corky, vain,
fluctuating, proud, stubborn heart in the world; it is impos-
sible, I say, for him either wilfully to run into any actual
sins, or insolently to hold up his head in the pride of his in-
tegrity. This very one meditation, that we all here might
justly have been left in heathenism, and that the sins of the
heathens shall be imputed to us their children, if we do not
repent, is enough to loosen the toughest, strongest spirit, to
melt the fiintiest heart, to humble the most elevated soul, to
habituate it with such a sense of its common miseries, that
it shall never have courage or confidence to venture on the
danger of particular rebellions.
2. From the view of their ignorance or impiety, which was
of so heinous importance, to examine ourselves by their in-
dictment, 1. for our learning; 2. for our lives; 3. for the life of
grace in us. 1. For our learning, whether that be not mixed
SERMON XXIV. 525
with a great deal of atheistical ignorance, with a delight, and
acquiescence, and contentation in those lower elements, which
have nothing of God in them; whether we have not sacri-
ficed the liveliest and sprightfulest part of our age and souls
in these philological and physical disquisitions, which if they
have not a perpetual aspect and aim at divinity, if they be not
set upon in that respect, and made use of to that purpose, κάρ-
ta βλάπτει, saith Clement ¥, their best friend, they are very
hurtful and of dangerous issue; whether out of our circle of
human heathen learning, whence the fathers produced pre-
cious antidotes, we have not sucked the poison of unhallowed
vanity, and been fed either to a pride and ostentation of our
secular, or a satiety or loathing of our theological learning,
as being too coarse and homely for our quainter palates ;
whether our studies have not been guilty of those faults
which cursed the heathen knowledge, as trusting to our-
selves, or wit and good parts, like the philosophers in Athe-
nagoras *, οὐ παρὰ Θεοῦ, x.T.X., “ not vouchsafing to be taught
by God” even in matters of religion, but every man con-
sulting, and believing, and relying on his own reason;
again, in making our study an instrument only to satisfy
our curiosity, ὡς τἀληθοῦς θεαταὶ, only as speculators of
some unknown truths, not intending or desiring thereby
either to promote virtue, good works, or the kingdom of
God in ourselves, or which is the ultimate end—which only
commends and blesses our study or knowledge—the glory
of God in others.
2. In our lives, to examine whether there are not also
many relics of heathenism, altars erected to Baalim, to Ce-
res, to Venus, and the like; whether there be not many
amongst us whose god is their belly, their back, their lust,
their treasure, or that ἄγνωστος θεὸς, that earthly unknowr
god (whom we have no one name for, and therefore is
called at large) the god of the world; whether we do not
with as much zeal, and earnestness, and cost, serve and wor-
ship many earthy vanities which our own fancies deify for us,
as ever the heathen did their multitude and shoal of gods;
and in brief, whether we have not found in ourselves the sins,
Y [Cf Strom. i. c. 6. § 36. p. 337. ed. Pott. ]
* Athenag. Legat. pro Christianis. [ὃ 7. p. 285. A.]
526 SERMON XXIV.
as well as the blood of the Gentiles, and acted over some or
all the abominations, set down to judge ourselves by, Rom. i.
from the 21st verse to the end.
Lastly, for the life of grace in us, whether many of us are
not as arrant heathens, as mere strangers from spiritual illu-
mination, and so from the mystical commonwealth of Israel,
as any of them; Clemens ?*, Strom. 11. calls the life of your un-
regenerate man a heathen life, and the first life we have by
which we live, and move, and grow, and see, but understand
nothing; and it is our regeneration by which we raise our-
selves ἐξ ἐθνῶν, “ from being still mere Gentiles :”” and Tati-
anus », further, that without the spirit we differ from beasts
only κατ᾽ ἔναρθον φωνὴν, “by the articulation of our voice.”
So that in fine, neither our reason, nor Christian profession,
distinguisheth us either from beasts or Gentiles, only the
Spirit is the formalis ratio by which we excel and differ from
the heathen sons of darkness. Wherefore, I say, to conclude,
we must in the clearest calm and serenity of our souls make
a most earnest search and inquest on ourselves, whether we
are yet raised out of this heathenism, this ignorance, this un-
regeneracy of nature, and elevated any degree im the estate
of grace; and if we find ourselves still Gentiles, and—which
is worse than that—still senseless of that our condition, we
must strive, and work, and pray ourselves out of it, and not
suffer the temptations of the flesh, the temptations of our
nature, the temptations of the world, nay, the tempta-
tions of our secular, proud learning, lull us one minute
longer in that carnal security, lest after a careless unregene-
rate natural life, we die the death of those bold, not vigilant,
but stupid philosophers. And for those of us who are yet
any way heathenish, either in our learning or lives; which
have nothing but the name of Christians to exempt us from
the judgment of their ignorance; “O Lord, make us in time
sensible of this our condition, and whensoever we shall hum-
ble ourselves before Thee, and confess unto Thee the sinful-
ness of our nature, the ignorance of our ancestors, and every
man the plague of his own heart, and repent and turn, and
pray toward Thy house, then hear Thou in heaven Thy dwell-
* (Clemens Alex. Strom., lib. ii. ο. 13. p. 459. ]
» Or. ο. Grecos, ὃ 15. [p. 256. D. ad eale. S. Just. ]
SERMON XXIV. δ27
ing-place, and when Thou hearest forgive; remember not our
offences, nor the offences of our heathen fathers, neither take
Thou vengeance of our sins, but spare us, O Lord, spare Thy
people whom Thy Son hath redeemed, and Thy Spirit shall
sanctify, from the guilt and practice of their rebellions.”
Now to God, who hath elected us, hath, &c.
SERMON XXV.
Acrs xvii. 30.
And the times of this ignorance God winked at, but now
commandeth alt men every where to repent.
* Tuxy which come from either mean or dishonoured progeni-
tors, will desire to make up their fathers’ defect by their own
industry, φιλοκινδυνότεροι γίνονται, saith Leo in his Tactics 4,
will be more forward to undertake any valiant enterprize, to
recover that reputation, which their ancestors’ cowardice and
unworthy carriage forfeited. So doth it nearly concern the
son of a bankrupt to set upon all the courses of thrift, and
stratagems of frugality, to get out of that hereditary poverty
in which his father’s improvidence had engaged him. Thus
is it also in the poverty and bankrupt estate of the soul;
they who come from prodigal ancestors, which have em-
bezzled all the riches of God’s mercy, spent profusely all the
light of nature, and also some sparks out of the Scriptures,
and whatsoever knowledge and directions they meet with,
either for the ordering of their worship, or their lives, spent
it all upon harlots, turned all into the adoring of those idol-
gods, wherein consists the spiritual adultery of the soul;
those I say who are the stems of this ignorant, profane,
idolatrous root, ought to endeavour the utmost of their
powers, and will, in probability, be so wise and careful as
to lay some strict obligations on themselves, to strive to
some perfection in those particulars which their ancestors
failed in; that if the Gentiles were perversely blind, and
resolutely, peremptorily ignorant, then must their progeny
strive to wipe off the guilt and avoid the punishment of their
δ [Leo Imperator, Tactica, cap. ii. § 24. ap. Meursium. Op., tom. vi. p. 549. ]
SERMON ΧΧΥ. 529
ignorance. Now this ignorance of theirs being not only by
Clemens and the fathers, but by Trismegistus in his Paema.i-
der”, defined to be μέθη καὶ ἀσέβεια καὶ ὕπνος ἄλογος, “a
profaneness, an irrational sleep, and drunkenness of the soul ;”
in sum, an ignorance of themselves and of God, and a stupid
neglect of any duty belonging to either; this ignorance being
either in itself or in its fruits κακία τῆς ψυχῆς “, “the wicked-
ness of the soul,” and all manner of transgression; the only
way for us, the successors of these ignorant Gentiles, to repair
those ruins, to renew the image of God in ourselves, which
their idolatrous ignorance defaced, must be to take the oppo-
site course to them, and to provide our remedy anti-parallel
to their disease, i.e., in respect of their simple ignorance,
to labour for knowledge; in respect of the effects of their
ignorance, idolatry, profaneness, and all manner of wicked-
ness, to labour for piety and repentance; briefly, if their
ignorance of God was an heinous sin, and virtually all kind
of sin, then to esteem repentance the greatest knowledge, to
approve and second the force and method of St. Paul’s argu-
ment, to prescribe ourselves whatever God commands. For
so here in this chapter, having discoursed over their igno-
rance, he makes that a motive of our repentance, and that
backed with a special item from God, who now “commands
every man every where to repent.”
We have heretofore divided these words, and in them handled
already the ignorance of the ancient heathen, which in the
justice of God might have provoked Him to have pretermitted
the whole world of succeeding Gentiles. We now come to
the second part, the mercy of God, not imputing their igno-
rance to our charge, whosoever every where to the end of the
world shall repent. And in this you must consider, first,
God’s covenant made with the Gentiles, or the receiving
them into the Church, deduced out of these words, “but
now commands,” for all to whom God makes known His
commands, are by that very cognizance known to be parts
of His Church; and with all these He enters covenant, He
> [ὦ λαοὶ, ἄνδρες γηγενεῖς, of μέθῃ 110. ii. prope finem.
καὶ ὕπνῳ ἑαυτοὺς ἐκδεδωκότες, καὶ τῇ © Pomander, lib. iv. [p. 10; ap-
ἀγνωσίᾳ τοῦ θεοῦ, νήψατε, παύσασθε pendedtothe Nova De Universis Phi-
κραιπαλῶντες, θελγόμενοι ὕπνῳ ἀλόγῳ.) losophia of Patricius. Venice, 1593. |
— Hermes Trismegistus, Pcemander,
HAMMOND, Mm
530 SERMON XXV.
promiseth salvation upon performance of the condition re-
quired by His commands—repentance. Secondly, the con-
dition itself, in the last words, “to repent.” And then lastly
the extent of both; the latitude of the persons with whom
this covenant is made, and from whom this condition is ex-
acted, ‘all men every where.” And first of the first, the
covenant made with the Gentiles, or the receiving them into
the Church, noted in these words, “ but now commands,” &e.
It is observable in our common affairs, that we do not use
to lay our commands on any but those who have some relation
to us; a king will not vouchsafe to employ any in any pecu-
liar service but those whom he hath entertained, and by
oath admitted into his court. And it is the livery by which
one is known to belong to such a family, if he be employed
in either common or special service by the master of it. To
express it more generally, they are called natural members
of a kingdom, who are tied to obedience to all laws or cus-
toms national, who are engaged in the common burdens as
well as privileges, the services as well as benefits of a sub-
ject. The ecclesiastical canons are meant and exhibited only
to those, who are either in truth or profession parts of the
Church; the Turk or infidel professed is not honoured so
much as to be bound to them. The orders and peculiar laws
of a city or country are directed to those who are either cives
or civitate donatt ; and our oaths and obligations to these, or
these local collegiate statutes, argue us, dvaxpitixas, to be
members of this or that foundation. Now to whomsoever
these laws and commands do belong, whosoever is thus en-
tertained and admitted into services, is partaker also of all
advantages which belong to a member of a family; and is
by covenant to receive all emoluments in as ample a man-
ner as any other of his quality. And this, briefly, is the state
of the Gentiles here in the text, who, in that God commands
them here to repent—which is the law and condition of the
New Testament—are judged upon these grounds to be re-
ceived into the covenant of the New Testament; and conse-
quently made members of the Church. For as once it was
an argument that only Jewry was God’s people, because they
only received His commands, and the heathen had not know-
ledge of His laws; so now was it as evident a proof that the
SERMON XXV. 531
heathen were received into His Church, 1. 6. into the number
of those whom He had culled out for salvation, because He
made known His ordinances to them, entertained them in
His service, and commanded them “ every one every where to
repent.” Appian“ observes in his procem to his History, that
the Romans were very coy in taking some nations into their
dominions ; they could not be persuaded by every one to be
their lords; he saw himself many ambassadors from the bar-
barians, who came solemnly to give themselves up to the
Roman greatness, ambitious to be received into the number
of their dominions, καὶ οὐ δεξάμενον βασιλέα, “and the
king would not receive such low unprofitable servants.” It
was esteemed a preferment, which it seems every nation
could not attain to, to be under the Roman government,
and commanded by the Roman laws; and there were many
reasons, if we may judge by the outside, why the Gentiles
should not be hkely to obtain this privilege from God, to
be vouchsafed His commands. For 1. they had been neazled 5
up in so many centuries of ignorance, they had been so
starved with thin hard fare, under the tyranny of a continued
superstition, which gave them no solid nourishment, nothing
but husks and acorns to feed on, that they were now grown
horrid and almost ghastly, being past all amiableness or
beauty, és οὐδὲν χρήσιμοι, “ good for nothing” in the world.
We 866 in histories that perpetual wars hinder tillage, and
suffer them not to bestow that culture on the ground which
the subsistence of the kingdom requires. Thus was it with
the Gentiles in the time of their θεομάχία, their hostility with
God; they generally bestowed no trimming or culture on the
soul, either to improve or adorn it; and then, receiving no
spiritual food from God, all passages being shut up by their
idolatry, they were famished into such a meagreness, they
were so ungainly and crest-fallen, that all the fat kine of
Egypt according to Pharaoh’s dream, all heathen learning
could not mend their looks, they were still for all their
philosophy, like the lean kine that had devoured the
fat, yet thrived not on it; they were still poor and ill-
4 [ Appian, Hist. Rom. Prefat. § 7. tle,no doubt. The same in Cheshire W.,
tom. i. p. 8. ed. Schweigh. ] and in other counties probably.--Moor’s
ὁ [Neezle, Imsinuating oneself into Suffolk Words and Phrases, p. 246. So
something snug or desirable—fromnes- neezing for nesting. Ibid. }
Mm 2
Gen. xli.
19.
John
xviii. 21.
Matt. xx.
19.
532 SERMON XXV.
favoured, “such as were not to be seen in all the land of
Jewry for badness.”
2. They had engaged themselves in such a course that
they could scarce seem ever capable of being received into any
favour with God. Polybius* observes it as a policy of those
which were delighted in stirs and wars, to put the people
upon some inhuman, cruel practice, some killing of ambas-
sadors, or the like feat, which was unlawful even amongst
enemies, that after such an action the enemy should be in-
censed beyond hope of reconciliation. So did Asdrubal in
Appian‘ use the captive Romans with all possible cruelty,
with all arts of inhumanity, flayed them, cut off their fingers,
and then hanged them alive; to the end, saith he, that
thereby he might make the dissensions of Carthage and
Rome ἀδιάλλακτα, not possibly to be composed, but to be
prosecuted with a perpetual hostility. This was the effect
of Ahitophel’s counsel to Absalom, that he should lie with
his father’s concubines; and this also was the devil’s plot
upon the Gentilés, who, as if they were not enough enemies
unto God for the space of two thousand years’ idolatry, at
last resolved to fill up the measure of their rebellions, to
make themselves, if it were possible, sinful beyond capability
of mercy; and to provoke God to an eternal revenge, they
must needs join in crucifying Christ, and partake of the
shedding of that blood, which hath ever since so dyed the
souls, and cursed the successions of the Jews. For it is
plain, 1. by the kind of His death, which was Roman; 2. by
His judge, who was Cesaris rationalis, by whom Judza was
then governed ; or, as Tacitus saith in the 15th of his Annals §,
Czsar’s procurator ; all capital judgments being taken from
the Jews’ Sanhedrim, as they confess, “it is not lawful for
us to put any one to death ;” 3. by the prophecy, “ They shall
deliver Him to the Gentiles;” by these, 1 say, and many
other arguments, it is plain that the Gentiles had their part
and guilt in the crucifying of Christ, and so by slaying of the
Son, as it is in the parable, provoked and deserved the im-
placable revenge of the Father. And yet for all this, God
enters league, and truce, and peace with them, thinks them
worthy to hear and obey His laws; nay, above the estate of
€ [Polyb. i. 70.] cis, c. cxviii. ed. Schweigh.] ὁ
* | Appian, lib. viii; De Reb. Puni- & Tacitus, Annal. xv. [c. 44.]
SERMON XXV. bod
servants, takes them into the liberty and free estate of the
gospel, and by binding them to ordinances as citizens, ex-
presseth them to be civitate donatos cewlesti, within the pale
of the Church, and covenant of salvation. ‘They which are
overcome and taken captives in war, may by law be possessed
by the victor for all manner of servitude and slavery, and
therefore ought to esteem any the hardest conditions of
peace and liberty as favours and mercies, ἐν χάριτι καὶ δω-
ped λαμβάνειν, saith Marcus in Polybius"; they which are
conquered must acknowledge themselves beholden to the
victor, if he will upon any terms allow them quarter or truce.
Thus was it above all other sinners with the Gentiles of that
time; after two thousand years’ war with the one God, they
were now fallen into His hands, ready to receive the sorest
strokes, to bear the shrewdest burdens He could lay on
them; had it not been then a favour above hope, to be re-
ceived even as hired servants, which was the highest of the
prodigal’s ambition? had it not been a very hospitable car- Luke xv.
riage towards the dogs, as they are called, to suffer them to Rees =a
lick up those “ crumbs which fell from the children’s table ?” 26.
Yet so much are God’s mercies above the pitch of our ex-
pectation or deserts, above what we are able or confident
enough to ask or hope, that He hath assumed and adopted
these captives into sons. And as once by the counsel of God
Jacob supplanted Esau, and thrust him out of his birth-right,
so now by the mercy of God, Esau hath supplanted Jacob,
and taken his room in God’s Church and favour; and instead
of that one language of the Jews, of which the Church so
long consisted, now is come in the confusion of the Gentiles,
Parthians, Medes, Elamites, and the Babel of tongues. And Acts ii. 9.
as once at the dispersion of the Gentiles by the miracle of a
punishment, they which were all of one tongue could not un-
derstand one another, so now at the gathering of the Gen- Gen. xi. 9.
tiles by a miracle of mercy’, they which were of several tongues
understood one another, and every “nation heard the Apo- Acts ii. 6.
stles speak in their own language;” noting thereby, saith
Austin, that the Catholic Church should be dispersed over
all nations, and speak in as many languages as the world
» [Polybius, lib. i. c. 31. ὃ 6.] apud S, Leonis Opera, tom. ii. p. 225.
' S. Leo Magn. [vide librum de Vo- This treatise is more probably to be as-
catione omnium Gentium, Jib. ii, c.xiv. signed to 5. Prosper. |
Hos. i. 11.
Isa. liv. 1.
10,
Acts x.
534 SERMON XXV.
hath tongues. Concerning the business of receiving the
Gentiles into covenant, St. Austin is plentiful in his 18th
book de Civit. Dei*, where he interprets the symbolical writ-
ing, and reads the riddles of the prophets to this purpose,
how they are called “the children of Israel,” as if Esau had
robbed Jacob of his name as well as inheritance; that they
are declared by the title of “barren and desolate,” whose
fruitfulness should break forth, surpass the number of the
children of the married wife!. To this purpose doth he en-
large himself to expound many other places of the prophets,
and among them the prophecy of Obadiah, from which—
Edom by a pars pro toto signifying the Gentiles—he expressly
concludes their calling and salvation™; but how that can hold
in that place, seeing the whole prophecy is a denunciation of
Obad. ver. judgments against Edom, and it is expressly read, “ For thy
violence against thy brother Jacob, shame shall cover thee,
and thou shalt be cut out for ever;” how, I say, from that
place, amongst others, this truth may be deduced, I leave to
the revealers of revelations, and that undertaking sort of peo-
ple, the peremptory expounders of depths and prophecies. In
the meantime we have places enough of plain prediction he-
yond the uncertainty of a guess, which distinctly foretold this
blessed catholic truth, and though Peter had not marked or
remembered them so exactly, as to understand that by them
the Gentiles were to be preached to, and no longer to be ac-
counted profane and unclean, yet it is more than probable that
the devil, a great contemplator, and well seen in prophecies,
observed so much; and, therefore, knowing Christ’s coming to
be the season for fulfilling it, about that time drooped and sen-
sibly decayed; lost much of his courage, and was not so ac-
tive amongst the Gentiles as he had been; his oracles began to
grow speechless, and to slink away beforehand, lest tarrying
still they should have been turned out with shame. Which
one thing, the ceasing of oracles, though it be by Plutarch”,
and some other of the devil’s champions, referred plausibly to
the change of the soil, and failing of enthusiastical vapours
and exhalations; yet was it an evident argument that at
k [S. Aug. De Civit. Dei, lib. xviii. = [Ibid., cap. 31.]
cap. 28. Op., tom. vii. p. 509. ] » [Plutarch., de Defectu Oracul.,
* [Ibid., cap. 29.] Op., tom. vii. p. 704, sq. Reisk. ]
SERMON XXV. 530
Christ’s coming Satan saw the Gentiles were no longer fit
for his turn, they were to be received into a more honourable
service under the living God, necessarily to be impatient of
the weight and slavery of his superstitions, and therefore it
concerned him to prevent violence with a voluntary flight,
lest otherwise he should with all his train of oracles have been
forced out of their coasts; for Lucifer was to vanish like
lightning, when the “light to lighten the Gentiles” did but pucks ii,
begin to appear; and his laws were outdated when God would ©
once be pleased to command. Now that, in a word, we may
more clearly see what calling, what entering into covenant
with the Gentiles, is here meant by God’s commanding them,
we are to rank the commands of God into two sorts, 1, com-
mon catholic commands, and these extend as far as the visible
Church; 2, peculiar commands, inward operations of the
Spirit, these are both privileges and characters, and properties
of the invisible Church, i.e. the elect, and in both these re-
spects doth He vouchsafe His commands to the Gentiles. In
the first respect God hath His louder trumpets, σάλπιγγος Matt. xxiv.
φωνὴν μεγάλην, which all acknowledge who are in the noise oF
of it, and that is the sound of the gospel, the hearing of
which constitutes a visible Church. And thus at the preach-
ing of the gospel, εἰς πάντα ἔθνη, all the heathens had know-
ledge of His laws, and so were offered the covenant if they
would accept the condition. For however that place, Acts 1. Acts i. 25.
25, be by one of our writers of the Church wrested, by chang-
ing—that I say not, by falsifying—the punctuation, to wit-
ness this truth, I think we need not such shifts to prove that
God took some course by the means of the ministry and
apostleship, to make known to all nations under heaven, 1. 6.
to some of all nations, both His gospel and commands; “the Rom. x.
sound of it went through all the earth,” Rom. x. 18, cited out 18
of Psalm xix. 4, though with some change of a word, their Ps. xix. 4.
“sound” in the Romans, for their “line” in the Psalmist—
caused by the Greek translators, who either read and rendered
nbyp for np, or else laid hold of the Arabic notion of the word,
the loud noise and clamour which hunters make in their pur-
suit and chase. So Mark xiv. 9, “This Gospel shall be Mark xiv.
preached throughout the world ;” so Mark xvi. 15, “to every δὲ ΣΎ ΤΟ:
Tatt. δ
creature ;” Matt. xxiv. 14, “in all the world,” and many the 14. ie:
Acts ii. 39.
536 SERMON XXV.
like, as belongs to our last particular to demonstrate. Besides
this, God had in the second respect His vocem pedissequam,
which the prophet mentions, a voice attending us to tell us
of our duty, to shew us the way, and accompany us therein.
And this, I say, sounds in the heart, not in the ear, and they
only hear and understand the voice, who are partakers as well
of the effect as of the news of the covenant. Thus in these
two respects doth He command—by His word in the ears of
the Gentiles, by giving every man every where knowledge of
His laws; and so in some Latin authors ὃ mandare signifies to
give notice, to express one’s will, to declare or proclaim; and
thus, secondly, doth He command by His Spirit in the spirits
of the elect Gentiles, by giving them the benefit of adoption ;
and in both these respects He enters a covenant with the
Gentiles—which was the thing to be demonstrated—with the
whole name of them at large, with some choice vessels of them
more nearly and peculiarly ; and this was the thing which by
way of doctrine we collected out of these words, “but now
commands.” Now that we may not let such a precious truth
pass by unrespected, that such an important speculation may
not float only in our brains, we must by way of application ~
press it down to the heart, and fill our spirits with the com-
fort of that doctrine, which hath matter for our practice, as
well as our contemplation. For if we do but lay to our
thoughts, 1. the miracle of the Gentiles’ calling—as hath
been heretofore and now insisted on—and 2. mark how
nearly the receiving of them into covenant concerns us their
successors, we shall find real motives to provoke us to a
strain and key above ordinary thanksgiving. For as Peter
spake of God’s promise, so it is in the like nature of God’s
command—which is also virtually a promise—it belonged
not to them only, but it is “to you and your children, and
to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God
shall call.” From the first, the miracle of their calling, our
gratitude may take occasion much to enlarge itself. It is
storied of Brasidas in the fourth of Thucydides”, that imput-
ing the victory which was somewhat miraculous to some
more than ordinary human cause, he went presently to the
temple loaded with offerings, and would not suffer the gods
° Justin, lib. xxiv. cap. 2. P [ Thucyd. iv. 116.]
SURMON XXV. 537
to bestow such an unexpected favour on him unrewarded ;
and can we pass by such a mercy of our God without a spiri-
tual sacrifice, without a daily anthem of magnificats and hal-
lelujahs ? Herodotus 4 observes it is as a proverb of Greece,
that if God would not send them rain, they were to famish ;
for they had, said he, no natural fountains, or any other help
of waters, ὅτε μὴ ἐκ τοῦ Διὸς μοῦνον, but what God from
above sent. So saith Thucydides" in the fourth of his His-
tory, there was but one fountain within a great compass, and
that none of the biggest. So also was Egypt, another part of
the heathen world, to be watered only by Nilus, and that
being drawn by the sun, did often succour them and fatten
the land, for which all the neighbours fared the worse; for
when Nilus flowed the neighbouring rivers were left dry,
saith Herodotus’. You need not the mythology ; the philo-
sophers, as well as soil of Greece, had not moisture enough
to sustain them from nature; if God had not sent them
water from heaven, they and all we Gentiles had for ever
suffered a spiritual thirst. Egypt and all the nations had
for ever gasped for drought, if the sunshine of the gospel
had not by its beams called out of the well which had no
bucket, ζῶν ὕδωρ, “living or enlivening water.” But by this John iv. 6.
attraction of the sun, these living waters did so break out
upon the Gentiles, that all the waters of Jewry were left dry,
as once the dew was on Gideon’s fleece, and drought on all Judg. vi.
the earth besides. And is it reasonable for us to observe this °”
miracle of mercy, and not return even a miracle of thanks-
giving? Can we think upon it without some rapture of our
souls? Can we insist on it, and not feel a holy tempest
within us, a storm and disquiet, till we have some way dis-
burdened and eased ourselves, with a pouring out of thanks-
giving? That spirit is too calm, that I say not stupid, which
can bear and be loaded with mercies of this kind, and not
take notice of its burden; for besides those peculiar favours
bestowed on us in particular, we are, as saith Chrysostom ¢,
in our audit of thanksgiving, to reckon up all the τὰ κοινῇ
ywopeva, “all those common benefactions of which others
4 [ Herod. ii. 13.] t [S. Chrysost. in Acta Apostol. Ho-
r [Thucyd. iv. 20. mil. xxxviii, Op., tom. ix. p. 292, C.]
s [ Herod. ii. 25.]
Acts xiv.
13.
538 SERMON XXV.
partake with us ;” for it is, saith he, an ordinary negligence
in us to recount God’s mercies as we confess our sins, only in
gross, with an ἁμαρτωλοί ἐσμεν, καὶ εὐηργέτησε Θεὸς, “we
are great sinners, and God hath abounded in mercies to us ;”
never calling ourselves to a strict retail either of our sins or
His mercies; and this neglect, saith he, doth deprive us of a
great deal of spiritual strength. For 1. the recounting of the
multitude of God’s mercies to us formerly might give us con-
fidence of the continuance of them, according to St. Cyprian,
donando debet, God’s past blessings are engagements and
pawns of future. 2. It is, saith he, of excellent use, πρὸς τὸ
οἰκειοῦν, “ to bring us acquainted” and familiar with God, and
infinitely increaseth our love to Him, and desire of perform-
ing some manner of recompense. Which one thing made the
heathen of old so love and respect their benefactors, that they
worshipped them, and would not suffer any common real
benefaction to be done them without an ἀποθέωσις to the
author of it, as might be proved through all ancient writ-
ings; for on these grounds was it that they would needs
sacrifice to Paul and Barnabas. In the second place, if we
consider how nearly it concerns us, that if they had been
pretermitted, we to the end of the world might probably
have lived in the same darkness, that we now hold our right
to heaven by the covenant made to them, that those com-
mands belong also to us and our children, then we must in
some reason of proportion thank God liberally for that call-
ing of the Gentiles, as we cannot choose but do for our pre-
sent adoption, and enlarge our thanksgiving not for our own
only, but for that first justification, sanctification, and salva-
tion of the Gentiles. And this effusion of our souls in thanks
will prove of good use to us, both to confirm our confidence,
and keep us in a Christian temper of humility and cheerful
obedience. And therefore I thought good to present it to
you in the first place as a duty of no ordinary moment.
2. If God hath commanded, and consequently expects our
obedience; if these commands concern us, and contain in
them all that belongs to our salvation ; if they are, as hath
been proved, God’s covenant with the Gentiles; then, not to
be wanting to ourselves, but earnestly to labour and provide
that no one circumstance of them may be without its peculiar
SERMON XXV, 539
profit and advantage to our souls. Polybius from the war
betwixt the Numidians and Uticenses observes, that if a vic-
tory gotten by the captain, be not by the soldiers prosecuted
to the utmost, it likely proves more dangerous than if they
had never had it ; if the king, saith he, take the city", of δὲ
πολλοὶ Sia προστήρημα ῥαθυμοῦντες, “and the multitude
overjoyed with the news, begin to grow less earnest in the
battle,” a hundred to one but the conquered will take notice
and heart from this advantage, and, as the Uticenses did,
make their flight a stratagem to get the victory. Thus 15 it
in those spiritual combats, where God is our leader, our com-
mander, our conqueror against the devil’s host; if we of His
command, the oi πολλοὶ, the many who expect our part in
the profit of the victory, do not prosecute this conquest to
the utmost, to the utter discomfiting and disarming of our fu-
gitive enemy; if we should grow secure upon the news, and
neither fear nor prevent any further difficulties, we may be
in more danger for that former conquest, and as it was or-
dinary in story, by that time we have set up our trophies,
ourselves be overcome. I might prescribe you many courses,
which it would concern you to undertake for the right man-
aging of this victory, which this our commander hath not
by His fighting, but by His very commanding, purchased us.
But because my text requires haste, and I go on but slowly,
I must omit them, and only insist on that which is specified
in my text, repentance, which drives to the condition of the
covenant, the matter of the command which comes next to
be discussed.
The word “repent” may in this place be taken in a double
sense; 1. generally for a sorrow for our sins, and on that a
disburdening of ourselves of that load which did formerly
press down the soul; for a sense of our former ill courses,
and a desire to fit ourselves for God’s service; for an hum-
bling ourselves before God, and flying to Him as our only
succour; and so it well may be called the condition of God’s
covenant with us, that which God requires at our hands
under the gospel; for it was the first word at the first preach-
ing of the gospel by John Baptist, “ Repent, for the king- Matt. iii. 2.
dom of God is at hand,” which, saith the text, was in effect,
ἃ Polybius, [lib. i. c. 74. § 10.]
ver, 3.
Matt. xxvi.
70.
540 SERMON XXY.
“ Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make His paths straight.”
So that, briefly, this “repent” is a straightening and rectify-
ing all crookedness, every distortion of the soul, and thereby
a preparing of it for the receiving of Christ and embracing
His gospel. 2. In a nearer relation to the first words of the
verse, repentance is taken more especially by way of opposi-
tion, for a mending and forsaking of that which of old was
the fault and guilt of the Gentiles, a reforming of every
thing which was either formally or virtually contained in
their ignorance; and what that is you shall briefly judge.
It is observed by interpreters, that doing or suffering,
action or passion, are expressed in Scripture by the word
knowing; soto know sin is to commit sin, to know a woman,
and the like. So Peter to the maid, “1 know not what thou
sayest,’” i.e. 1 am not guilty of the doing what thou im-
putest to me. According to which Hebraism, to know God
and His laws is to worship Him, and perform them; and,
consequently, to be ignorant of both is neither to worship
God nor practise any thing which His laws command; and
so, knowledge shall contain all piety and godly obedience, or
love of God’s commandments, as God is said to know those
whom He loves; and ignorance, all profaneness and neglect,
yea, and hatred either of God or goodness. According to
which exposition are those two sayings, the one of Hermes *
in his tenth book called νοῦς ἡ τριςκακία τὸ ἀγνοεῖν τὸν
Θεὸν, “ the ignorance of God is all manner οὗ sin;” the other
of Pastor in Clemens’, μετάνοια σύνεσις μεγάλη; “ repentance
is a great piece of knowledge or wisdom.” So that, briefly,
the recovering of the soul to the pure knowledge of God and
goodness, the worshipping, loving, and obeying of God, is
the thing here meant byrepentance; which yet we may press
into a nearer room, into one single duty, the directing all
our actions to His glory; for this is in effect to worship, to
obey, to love God, to worship for obedience’ sake, because he
commands it, to obey Him for love’s sake, because we desire
He should be glorified in our obedience. And this is the
excellency and perfection of a Christian, infinitely above the
reach of the proudest moralists; this is the repentance of a
x [Hermes Trismeg. (ut supr.) lib. x. y [Herme Pastor (i. 4, ΕΞ .) ut ἃ
ad fin. ] Clem. Alex. Strom. ii. 12. p. 458 ire
SERMON XXV. 541
Christian, whereby he makes up those defects which were most
eminently notorious in the heathen; this is the impression
of that humbling spirit, which proud heathen nature was
never stamped with, for it was not so much their ignorance
in which they offended God,—though that was also full of
guilt, as hath been proved,—as their misusing of their know-
ledge to ungainly ends, as either ambition, superstition, or
for satisfying their curiosity, as partly hath, and for the pre-
sent needs not further to be demonstrated. Only for us,
whom the command doth so nearly concern of repenting for
and reforming their abuses, how shall we be cast at the bar,
if we still continue in the same guilt! The orderly com-
position of the world, saith Athenagoras’, the greatness, com-
plexion, figure, and harmony of it, are πρὸς θεοσέβειαν ἐνέ-
χυρα ἡμῖν, “engagements to us and pawns to oblige us to a
pious worship of God.” For what Philoponus observes of
the doctrine of the soul, is in like manner true of all kind of
learning, εἰς ὅλον τὸν βίον τείνει δόγματα ταῦτα, “they ex-
tend and have an influence over all our conversation ;᾽ and
if they be well studied, and to purpose, leave their characters
and impressions in our lives as well as our understandings ;
and from thence arose the Gentiles’ guilt, who did only enrich
their intellectual part with the knowledge and contempla-
tion of them, no whit better their lives, or glorify God which
made them. But for us, whose knowledge is much elevated
above their pitch, who study and ordinarily attain to the un-
derstanding of those depths which they never fathomed, the
reading of those riddles which they never heard of, the ex-
pounding of those mysteries which they never dreamt of;
for us, I say, who have seen a marvellous light, thereby only
to enlighten our brains and not our hearts, to divert that
precious knowledge to some poor, low, unworthy ends; to
gather nothing out of all our studies which may advance
God’s kingdom in us, this is infinitely beyond the guilt of
heathenism; this will call their ignorance up to judgment
against our knowledge, and in fine make us curse that light
which we have used to guide us only to the chambers of
death. Briefly, there was no one thing lay heavier upon the
Gentiles than the not directing that measure of knowledge
z [ Athenag. Legat. pro Christianis, § 4. [p. 283, A.]
542 SERMON XXV.
they had to God’s glory and a virtuous life ; and nothing more
nearly concerns us Christians to amend and repent of. For
the most exquisite knowledge of nature, and more specially the
most accurate skill in theological mysteries, if it float only in
the brain, and sink not down into the heart, if it end not in
reformation of erroneous life, as well as doctrine, and glorify-
ing God in our knowledge of Him, it is to be reputed but a
glorious, specious curse, not an enriching, but a burdening
of the soul, durum Tholosanum, an unlucky merchandise, that
can never thrive with the owner, but commonly betrays and
destroys all other good affections and graces in us. Socrates
was the first that brought morality into the schools, ideogue
ad hominum salutem natus est, said an old philosopher”; and
that made the oracle so much admire him for the wisest man
in the world. At any piece of speculation the devil durst
challenge the proudest philosopher amongst them; but for a
virtuous life he despaired of ever reaching to it; this set him
at a gaze, this posed and made a dunce of him, and forced
him to proclaim the moralist the greatest scholar under hea-
ven; οἴησις ἱερὰ νόσος, saith Hesychius® περὶ σοφῶν, the
“making use of knowledge to ambition or puffing up, is a dan-
gerous desperate disease,’ and pray God it be not ἱερὰ also
in its other sense, a disease that attends our holiest specula-
tions, even our study of divinity. For as Arrian® saith of
those who read many books and digest none, so is it most
true of those who do not concoct their πολυμαθία, and turn
it into spiritual nourishment of the soul, ἐμοῦσι καὶ ἀποπέπ-
τουσι, they vomit it up again, and are never the better for it ;
they are oppressed with this very learning, as a stomach with
crudities, and thereby fall many times εἰς στρόφους καὶ καταρ-
ροίας, into vertigoes and catarrhs, the first of which disorders
the brain, and disables it from all manner of action; or if the
more classical notion of the word take place, it disaffects the
bowels, entangles and distorts the entrails, and, as St. Paul
complains on this occasion, leaves without natural affection,
a §. Augustin., De Civitate Dei, lib. his Nova De Universis Philosophia.
viii. cap. 3, &c. [Op., tom. vii. p.191.] Venice, 1593.]
Ὁ [Verum Socrates, caritate patriz ¢ [Hesychius, s. v. Heraclitus, ap.
ardens, et, ut Proclus ait, ad hominum Meursium. Op., tom. vii. p. 249.]
salutem natus, &c. Patricius in his 4 [Arrian., Epicteti Dissertat., lib. i.
Plato Exotericus, p. 43, appended ἰο ο. 26. § 16.)
SERMON XXV. 543
and then, 2, by the defluxion of the humours on the breast,
clogs and stifles the vital parts, and in fine brings the whole
man to a φθίσις, or corruption of all its spiritual graces. Thus
have you at once the doctrine and the use of my second part,
the nature of that repentance which is here meant in oppo-
sition to the Gentiles’ fault, which we have shewed to be the
directing of our knowledge to a sober pious end, God’s glory
and our own edification, together with the danger and sinful-
ness attending the neglect of these ends, both which are sufli-
cient motives to stir you up, to awake and conjure you to the
practice of this doctrine. To which you may add but this one
more, that even some of the heathen were raised up by the
study of the creatures to an admiration of God’s excellency,
which was a kind of glorifying His power, and those Philo-
ponus® calls τελείους φυσιολόγους, “perfect exact natural-
ists ;’ who from physical causes ascend to divine. Witness
Galen‘, de Usu Partium, where from the miraculous struc-
ture of the foot, he falls off into a meditation and hymn of
God’s providence, δημιουργήσαντος ἡμᾶς ὕμνον ἀλήθινον, “a
psalm or holy elogy of Him that hath so wonderfully made
us.” So Hermes, in his first book of piety and philosophy,
makes the only use of philosophy to return thanks to the
Creator as to a good father and profitable nurse, which duty
he professes himself resolved never to be wanting in; and
after, in the latter end of his fifth book ἢ, he makes good his
word, breaking out into a kind of holy rhythm, ποῦ δὲ βλέ-
πων εὐλογήσω σε, ἄνω, κάτω, ἔσω, K.T.X. The like might be
shewed in some measure out of others, more classic heathen
writers, which may briefly serve to upbraid our defects, and
aggravate our offence, if we with all our natural and spiri-
tual light go on yet in learning, as travellers in peregrina-
tion, only either as curious inquisitors of some novelties,
which they may brag of at their return, or else having no
other end of their travel but the journey itself, without any
care to direct our studies to the advancement either of God’s
glory in other, or grace’s kingdom in ourselves. For this is
the thing no doubt here aimed at, and the performance of it
e [Philoponus, Comment. in Aris- 8. [Herm. Trismeg., De Pietate et
tot. de Anima, Pref. in lib, i, ad fi- Philosophia, lib. i. ad init., p. 4.]
nem. | h [Id., ibid., lib. v. ad finem. ]
f Galen, De Usu Part., lib. iii. c. 6.
Mark xvi.
15.
1 Cor. ii. 4.
Gen. viii.
11.
544 SERMON XXVv.
as strictly required of us Christians, and that not some only
of us, but as many as the commandment is here given to,
“every man every where.” So I come to my last particular,
the extent and latitude of the persons with whom this cove-
nant is made, and from whom this condition is exacted, “ All
men every where.”
Now the universality of the persons reflects either to the
preceding words, commands, or to the subsequent, the mat-
ter of these commands, repentance. From the first, the
point is, that God’s commands were made known by the
preaching of the gospel to “all men every where.” From
the second, that the repentance here meant is necessary to
every man that will be saved. For the first, it hath been
already proved out of Scripture, that the vocal articulation
of God’s commands, the sound and preaching of the gospel,
hath gone out into all the world, and that not universis, but
singulis, directed and promulged at least to every creature,
the whole Gentile world has title to it. Now for the spiri-
tual efficacy of this voice, the “demonstration of the Spirit
and of power,” hath not this also waited on the voice, and in
some kind or other evidenced itself in the like extensive lati-
tude? Yes, no doubt; for there being two effects of the preach-
ing of the word, either converting or hardening, either dis-
solving the wax, or stiffening the clay, you shall im every man
be sure to meet with one of them.
For the conversion; what a multitude came in at the first
noise of it, primo mane, as soon as ever the Sun of righteous-
ness began to dawn. In the ancient sea-fights they had their
λεμβάδια, little hight ships, πρωτόπλοι, saith Xenophon’, zpe-
mot, Kal σκοποὶ, say Thucydides* and Polybius', which they
sent out as spies in the night, or at day-break, to bring word
how the seas were cleared; that so they might dare to make
use of the first opportunity to go out with their whole navy.
Thus was Job and some few other Gentiles before the Gospel,
and Cornelius at the dawning of it, sent before in a manner,
ut lembi ante classem, to spy and bring word whether the
Gentiles might enter and be received ; and these returning to
them like Noah’s dove “ with an olive-leaf in her mouth,” as a
i [Xenophon, Hist. Grec., lib. v. κα [ Thucydides, lib. vi. c. 44. 46.]
cap. 1. ὃ 27.] ' [ Polybius, lib. 1, c. lin. § 8.1
SERMON XXV. 5A5
token of peace and safety to all that would venture, then did
the whole navy and troop follow, then did the τὸ πλέον καὶ
οἱ πολλοὶ, “the many,” the rout, the common people of the
world, out of all nations and conditions some, hasten and
run and crowd for a part in this salvation, and “the glory of
the Lord was revealed, and all flesh saw it together,” as it is Isa. xl. 5.
in the phrase of the prophecy, or in the words of the story,
*“there were daily added to the Church such as should be [eet ii.
saved.” Look but on the doctor of the Gentiles, as he sits
in his chair in Tyrannus’ school, and you shall find that at Acts xix. 9.
that one lecture—which indeed was two years long—all the
lesser Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus, both Jews and
Greeks. The three thousand souls which were added to the Acts ii. 4.
Church at St. Peter’s sermon, was a sufficient hour’s work,
and a thing so admired by the wise men of the Gentiles, that
they imputed it magicis Petri artibus et veneficis carminibus,
saith Austin™, to some incantations and magical tricks which
Peter used. And they got the dying oracle to confirm it
with some supposititious verses, to the purpose forged by
them; that the Christian religion was raised by Peter’s
witcheraft, and by it should last three hundred and sixty-
five years, and then be betrayed and vanish". But had these
same Gentiles in this humour of malice and prejudice seen
a third part of the Roman world, all the proconsular Asia,
converted by one Paul’s disputations, they would certainly
have resolved that ail the sorcery of hell or Chaldza could
never have yielded such miraculous enchantments. And
this the sons of Sceva had experience of, who with all their Acts xix.
exorcisms, and the name of Jesus added to them, could not ae
yet imitate the Apostles in any one miracle; but the devil
was too hard for them, wounded, overcame, prevailed against
them. Briefly, it was more than the magic either of men or
devils, which so convinced the artificers of hell, that they
“brought out their books and burnt them openly ;” which Acts xix.
beside the price of their most profitable skill, were rated at !®
50,000 pieces of silver, which is computed to be about £6,250.
“So mightily grew the word of God and prevailed,” and [ver. 20.]
the first effect of it, conversion, was miraculously manifest,
though not on all, yet on many of all people every where.
m S. Aug. De Civ, Dei, lib. xviii. c. 53. [Op., t. vii. p. 536, E, F.) lla 07]
HAMMOND. Nn
Acts xix. 9.
546 SERMON XXV.
Now for the other effect of it, the hardening of obdurate
atheists, look on Acts xix. 9, where it is plain, that for all
Paul’s logic and rhetoric, “ disputing and persuading for the
space of three months,” many were hardened and believed
not. They had within them νοῦν ἀντίτυπον, as Theodoret
calls it, a heart that would reverberate either precept or in-
struction, and make it rebound against the hand that sent it;
πνεῦμα παχυνόμενον, as Philoponus® phrases it in his first -
book de anima, their spirits fattened and incrassated within
them, stalled up and fed to such a brawniness, that neither the
understanding nor the affections were capable of any im-
pression, and so their condition proved like that of the anvil,
which by many strokes is somewhat smoothed but no whit
softened; all they got by one day’s preaching was to enable
them the better to resist the second. Every sermon of a
Paul or Peter was but an alarum to set them on their guard
of defence, to warn them to cast up some more trenches and
bulwarks, to fortify themselves stronger against any possible
invasion of God’s Spirit ; according to that of the Egyptian
Hermes?, speaking περὶ δυνάμεως ἱερῶν λόγων, which is in a
Christian phrase the “power of the Scripture ;” they have,
saith he, this property in them, that when they meet with
evil men, μᾶλλον παροξύνουσιν εἰς κακίαν, “they do more
sharpen and egg them on to evil.” Thus was the preaching
of the word to all men every where attended with some effects
or other, according to the materials it met with, never re-
turned unprofitably, but either was the power of God to sal-
vation unto all that believed, or the witness of God to con-
demnation to those which were hardened. Now if this
precious receipt administered to all find not in all the hike
effect of recovering, yet from hence is neither the physic to
be underprized nor the prescriber; the matter is to be im-
puted sometimes to the weakness and peevishness of the
patient, ὡς ἀδυνατέειν Ta προστασσόμενα ὑπουργέειν, “ that
he cannot or will not perform the prescriptions,” sometimes
τὴν δύναμιν αἰτιᾶσθαι τοῦ πάθεος, “the fault is to be laid on
the stubbornness and stoutness of the disease,” which turns
° [Philoponus, Comment. in Aristot. tate et Philosophia, p. 5. 4. i. ad
de Anima, Pref. in lib. 1. ad finem. ] finem. ]
p [Hermes Trismegistus, De Pie-
SERMON XXV. 547
every medicine into its nourishment, and so is not abated
but elevated by that which was intended to assuage it, as
Hippocrates defines it medicinally in his book περὶ teyvijs.
So then by way of use, if we desire that these commands,
this covenant offered to all men every where, may evidence
itself to our particular souls in its spiritual efficacy, we must
with all the industry of our spirits endeavour to remove those
hinderances, which may any way perturb, or disorder, or
weaken it in its working in us; προκατασκευάσθω σοι pa-
λαγμάτων γένεα, K.T.r., Saith Hippocrates", you must furnish
yourself beforehand with a shop of several softening plasters,
and take some one of them as a preparative before every ser-
mon you come to, that coming to church with a tender,
mollified, waxy heart, you may be sure to receive every holy
character, and impression, which that day’s exercise hath
provided for thee, lest otherwise, if thou shouldst come to
church with an heart of ice, that ice be congealed into
erystal, and by an ἀντιπερίστασις, the warmth of God’s word
not abate, but increase the coldness of a chill frozen spirit,
and finding it hard and stubborn, return it obdurate. O
what a horrid thing is it that the greatest mercy under
heaven should by our unpreparedness be turned into the
most exquisite curse that hell or malice hath in store for us!
that the most precious balm of Gilead should by the malig-
nity of some tempers be turned into poison; that the leaves
which are appointed for the healing of the nations should
meet with some such sores, which prove worse by any re-
medy; that the most sovereign μαλακτικὸν, or lenitive, in
the world, should only work to our obduration, and the
preaching of the word of mercy add to the measure of our
condemnation! This is enough to persuade you by an horror
into some kind of solicitude to prepare your souls to a capa-
bility of this cure, to keep yourselves in a Christian temper,
that it may be possible for a sermon to work upon you, that
that breath which never returns in vain may be truly gospel,
happy in its message, may convert not harden you; to which
purpose you must have such tools in store which the physi-
4 [Cf. Hippocrates, rep) rexv7js, tom. ® (Hippocrates, περὶ εὐσχημοσύνης,
i, p. 12. Medici Greci, tom, xxi. ed. tom.i. p. 73. Καὶ μη. ut supr. |
Kiihn. J
Nn 2
¢
Acts xix.4.
548 SERMON XXV.
cian’ speaks of, ὄργανα, καὶ μηχανὰς, καὶ σίδηρον, “ imstru-
ments of spiritual surgery,” to cut and prune off all luxuriant
cumbersome excrescences, all rankness and dead flesh, which
so oppress the soul, that the virtue of medicine cannot search
to it. And for this purpose there is no one more necessary,
of more continual use for every man every where, than that
which here closeth my text, “ repentance.”
And so I come to the second respect, the universality of
the persons, as it refers to the matter of the command, re-
pentance, every man every where to repent.
And here I should shew you that repentance, both gene-
rally taken for a sorrow for sin, containing in it virtually
faith also,—so the baptism of repentance is interpreted, Acts
xix. 4, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, say-
ing unto the people,that they should believe,” &c.,—and more
especially in this place taken for the directing of our know-
ledge to practice, and both to God’s glory, as hath been
shewn, is and always was necessary to every man that will
be saved. For according to Aristotle’st rule, κατὰ παντὸς,
noting both an universality of subject and circumstance, is a
degree of necessity; and therefore repentance being here
commanded, πᾶσι πανταχοῦ, is to be judged a condition
necessary to every man who answers at the command, i.e.
who expects his part in the covenant of salvation; this, I
say, I might prove at large, and to that purpose vindicate
the writings of some of the fathers, especially of Clemens,
who, I am almost confident, is groundlessly cited for bestow-
ing salvation on the heathen, without exacting the condition
of faith and repentance, which now it were superfluous to
insist on. 2. Urge it both to your brains and hearts, and by
the necessity of the duty, rouse and enforce, and pursue you
to the practice of it. But seeing this catholic duty is more
the inspiration of the Holy Ghost than the acquisition of our
labours, seeing this fundamental cardinal gift comes from the
supreme donor, seeing nature is no more able spiritually to
re-enliven a soul than to animate a carcass, our best endea-
vour will be our humiliation, our most profitable directions
will prove our prayers, and what our frailty cannot reach to,
our devotions shall obtain.
* Hippocrates, [ibid., p. 72.] t [ Aristot. Post. Anal., lib. i. c. 4.)
SERMON ΧΧΥ. 549
And let us labour and pray, and be confident, that God
which hath honoured us with His commands will enable us
to a performance of them, and having made His covenant
with us, will fulfil in us the condition of it ; that the thunder-
ing of His word being accompanied with the still voice of
His Spirit, may suffer neither repulse nor resistance; that
our hearts being first softened, then stamped with the Spirit,
may be the images of that God that made them; that all of
us every where endeavouring to glorify God in our know-
ledge, in our lives, in our faith, in our repentance, may for
ever be glorified by Him, and through Him, and with Him
hereafter.
Now to Him that hath elected us, hath created, re-
deemed, ce.
Ezek. xvi.
6.
SERMON XXVI.
Rom. 1. 26.
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections.
In this most accurate Epistle that ever the pen of man
could lay title to, in which all the counsels, and proceedings,
and methods of God in the work of our salvation are de-
scribed, our Apostle in his discourse goes on the same way
that God is said to do in His decree; lays the foundation of
it as low and deep as possible, begins with them as it were in
massa, and though they were already Romans and Christians,
yet before he openeth heaven gates to them, and either teaches
or suffers them to be saints, he stays them awhile in the con-
templation of their impurity, and damned neglected estate of
the stock they come from; looks upon them as “ polluted or
trodden down in their own blood,” as the phrase is. He
ploughs and harrows, and digs as deep as possible, that the
seed which he meant to sow might be firm rooted, that their
heaven might be founded in the centre of the earth, and their
faith being secured by the depth of its foundation, might in-
crease miraculously both in height and fruitfulness. Thus
in the latter part of this first chapter doth he shew them the
estate and rebellions, and punishment of their heathen an-
cestors, that the unregenerate man may in that glass see his
picture at the length, the regenerate humble himself in a
thankful horror, overjoyed, and wondering to observe him-
self delivered from such destruction. And that all may be
secured from the danger of the like miscarriage, he sets the
whole story of them distinctly before their eyes. 1. How the
law and light of nature was sufficient to have instructed them
into the sight and acknowledgment of God, and therefore
that they could not pretend want of means to direct them to
‘
SERMON XXVI. 551
His worship. 2. That they contemned and rejected all the
helps and guidances that God and nature had afforded them ;
and that therefore, 3. God had deserted, and given them up
unto the pride, and luxury, and madness of their own hearts,
all “vile affections ;” for this is the force of the illation, they
abused those instructions which God had printed in the
creature to direct them, and therefore He will bestow no
more pains on them to so little purpose; their own reason
convinced them there was but one God, and yet they could
not hold from adoring many, and therefore He will not be
troubled to rein them in any longer; for all His ordinary
restraints they will needs run riot, and “for this cause God
gave them up to vile affections.” So that in the text you
may observe the whole state and history of a heathen,
natural, unregenerate life, which is a progress or travel
from one stage of sinning to another, beginning in a con-
tempt of the light of nature, and ending in the brink of
hell, all vile affections. For the discovery of which we shall
survey, 1. The law or light of nature, what it can do; 2.
The sin of contemning this law or light, both noted in the
first words, “ for this cause,” that is, because they did reject
that which would have stood them in good stead; 3. The
effect or punishment of this contempt, sottishness leading
them stupidly into all vile affections; and lastly, the inflicter
of this punishment and manner of inflicting of it, “God gave
them up ;” and first of the first, the law and light of nature,
what it can do.
To suppose a man born at large, left to the infinite liberty
of a creature, without any terms or bounds, or laws to cir-
cumscribe him, were to bring a river into a plain, and bid it
stand on end, and yet allow it nothing to sustain it; were to
set a babe of a day old into the world, and bid him shift for
a subsistence; were to bestow a being on him only that he
may lose it, and perish before he can ever be said to live. If
an infant be not bound in, and squeezed, and swathed, he
will never thrive in growth or feature, but as Hippocrates
saith of the Scythians, for want of girdles, run all out into
breadth and ugliness. And therefore it cannot agree either
with the mercy or goodness of either God or nature to create
4 (Hippocrates, De aére, locis et aquis, tom. i. p. 559. ]
552 SERMON XXVI.
men without laws, or to bestow a being upon any one with-
out a guardian to guide and manage it. Thus, lest any
creature for want of this law any one moment should imme-
diately sin against its creation, and no sooner move than be
annihilated ; the same wisdom hath ordered that his very
soul shall be his law-giver, and so the first minute of its
essence should suppose it regular. Whence it is that some
atheists in Theophilus ad Autolycum”, which said that all things
were made by chance and of their own accord, yet affirmed
that when they were made they had a God within them to
guide them, their own conscience, and in sum affirmed,
μόνον εἷναι Θεὸν συνείδησιν, “that there was no other God
in the world.” Aristotle’ observes that in the creatures which
have no reason phantasy supplies its place, and does the bee
as much service to perform the business of its kind as reason
doth in the man. Thus further in them whose birth in an
uncivilized country hath deprived of any laws to govern
them, reason supplies their room, λόγος φύσει νόμος, saith
Arius Didymus4, “reason is naturally a law,” and hath as
sovereign dictates with it, pronounceth sentence every minute
from the tribunal within, as authoritatively as ever the most
powerful Solon did in the theatre. There is not a thing in
the world purely and absolutely good, but God and nature
within commends and prescribes to our practice; and would
we but obey their counsels and commands, it were a way
to innocence and perfection that even the Pelagians never
dreamt of. Τὸ speak no further than will be both profitable
and beyond exception, the perfectest law in the world is not
so perfect a rule for our lives as this ἔμφυτος καὶ φυσικὸς
νόμος, as Methodius® calls it, “this law of nature born with
us,” is for these things which are subject to its reach. Shall
I say Scripture itself is in some respect inferior to it? I
think I shall not prejudice that blessed volume, for though
it be as far from the least spot or suspicion of imperfection
as falsehood, though it be true, perfect, and righteous alto-
gether, yet doth it not so evidence itself to my dull soul; it
υ Theophil. ad Autolyc., lib. ii.§ 4. 15. p. 817, D.] ἶ
[ Ad calc, 5. Just. M., p. 349, D.] 6 [Ap. Photium, Biblioth., p. 915.
¢ (Arist. Metaph. A.c. 1.] ed. Hoeschel. ]
ἃ [Euseb, Prep. Evang., lib. xv. c.
*
SERMON XXVI. 5538
speaks not so clearly and irrefragably, so beyond all contra-
diction and demur to my atheistical understanding, as that
law which God hath written in my heart. For there is a
double certainty, one of adherence, another of evidence, one
of faith, the other of sense; the former is that grounded on
God’s word, more infallible because it rests on divine autho-
thority, the latter more clear, because I find it within me by
experience. The first is given to strengthen the weakness
of the second, and is therefore called βεβαιότερος λόγος, “a 2 Pet. i. 19.
more firm sure word ;” the second given within us to explain
the difficulties and obscurities of the first, αὐτοπταὶ γεννη-
θέντες, we “saw it with our eyes:” so that Scriptures being ver. 16.
conceived into words and sentences, are subject either not to
be understood or amiss; and may either be doubted of by
the ignorant, or perverted by the malicious. You have learnt
so many words without book, and say them minutely by
heart, and yet not either understand or observe what you are
about; but this unwritten law, which no pen but that of
nature hath engraven, is in our understandings, not in words
but sense, and therefore I cannot avoid the intimations; it
is impossible either to deny or doubt of it, it being written
as legible in the tables of our hearts, as the print of humanity
in our foreheads. The commands of either Scripture or
emperor may be either unknown or out of our heads, when
any casual opportunity shall bid us make use of them; but
this law of the mind is at home for ever, and either by inti-
mation or loud voice, either whispers or proclaims its com-
mands to us; be it never so gagged it will mutter, and will be
sure to be taken notice of when it speaks softliest. To define
in brief what this law of nature is, and what offices it per-
forms in us, you are to know that at that grand forfeiture of
all our inheritance,—goods truly real and personal,—all those
primitive endowments of soul and body upon Adam’s rebel-
lion, God afterwards, though He shined not on us in His full
image and beauty, yet cast some rays and beams of that
eternal light upon us; and by an immutable law of His own
counsel hath imprinted on every soul that comes down toa
body, a secret, unwritten, yet indelible law, by which the
creature may be warned what is good or bad, what agreeable,
what hurtful to the obtaiming of the end of its creation. Now
Rom. i.
21
554 SERMON XXVI.
these commands or prescriptions of nature, are either in
order to speculation or practice, to increase our knowledge
or direct our lives. The former sort I omit, as being fitter
for the schools than pulpit to discourse on, I shall meddle
only with those that refer to practice, and those are either
common, which they call first principles, and such are in
every man in the world equally, e¢ secundum rectitudinem et
notitiam, saith Aquinas‘; every one doth both conceive them
in his understanding what they mean, and assent to them in
his will, that they are right and just, and necessary to be
performed ; and of this nature are the worship of God and
justice amongst men; for that lumen super nos signatum, in
Bonaventure’s® phrase, that “ light which nature hath sealed
and imprinted on our souls,” is able to direct us in the know-
ledge of those moral principles, without any other help re-
quired to persuade us; or else they are particular and proper
to this or that business, which they call conclusions drawn
out of these common principles; as when the common prin-
ciple commands just dealing, the conclusion from thence
commands to restore what I have borrowed, and the like.
And these also if they be naturally and directly deduced,
would every man in the world both understand and assent
to; did not some hinderance come in, and forbid or suspend
either his understanding or assent. Hinderances which keep
him from the knowledge or conceiving of them, are that con-
fusion and chaos, and black darkness, I had almost said that
Tophet and hell of sensual affections, which suffers not the
light to shew itself, and indeed so stifles and oppresses it,
that it becomes only as hell fire, not to shine but burn, not
to enlighten us what we should do, but yet by gripes and
twinges of the conscience to torment us for not doing of it.
And this hinderance the Apostle calls the vanity of imagi-
nations by which a foolish heart is darkened. Hinderances
which keep us from assenting to a conclusion in particular
which we do understand, are sometimes good ; as, first, a sight
of some greater breach certain to follow the performance of
this; so though I understand that I must restore every man
his own, yet I will never return a knife to one that I see re-
£ S. Thom, Aq. Summa 1™* 2* qu. 5. §. Bonaventura, in lib. ii. Sentent.
94, [art. 4. ] Dist. 39. Art. 3. quest. 2. [conclus. ]
—— <r
SERMON XXVI. 555
solved to do some mischief with it; and 2. Divine laws, as
the command of robbing the Egyptians, and the like; for [Exod. xi.
although that in our hearts forbid robbing, yet God is J
greater than our hearts, and must be obeyed when He pre-
scribes it. Hinderances in this kind are also sometimes bad ;
such are either habitude of nature, custom of country, which
made the Lacedzemonians esteem theft a virtue ; or again the
tyranny of passions; for every one of these hath its several
project upon the reasonable soul, its several design of malice
either by treachery or force to keep it hoodwinked, or cast it
into a lethargy, when any particular virtuous action requires
to be assented to by our practice. If I should go so far as
some do, to define this law of nature to be the full will of
God written by His hand immediately in every man’s heart
after the fall, by which we feel ourselves bound to do every
thing that is good and avoid every thing that is evil, some
might through ignorance or prejudice guess it to be an eleva-
tion of corrupt nature above its pitch, too near to Adam’s
integrity; and yet Zanchy", who was never guessed near a
Pelagian, in his fourth tome, lib. i. c. 10. Thesis 8, would au-
thorize every part of it, and yet not seem to make an idol of
nature, but only extol God’s mercy, who hath bestowed a soul
on every one of us with this character and impression, Holi-
ness to the Lord; which though it be written unequally, in
some more than others, yet saith he, in all in some measure
so radicated, that it can never be quite changed or utterly
abolished. However I think we may safely resolve with
Bonaventure‘ out of Austin against Pelagius, Non est parum
accepisse naturale indicatorium, it is “no small mercy that we
have received a natural glass,” in which we may see and
judge of objects before we venture on them, a power of dis-
tinguishing good from evil", which even the malice of sin
and passions in the highest degree cannot wholly extinguish
in us; as may appear by Cain, the voice of whose conscience
spake as loud within him as that of his brother’s blood; as
also in the very damned, whose worm of sense, not penitence
for what they have done in their flesh, shall for ever bite and
» Zanchii Opera Theologica, tom.iv. ο. 20. Op., tom. i. p. 633, A.]
p- 190. Genev. 1619. k Which Damascene calls, lucem na-
i [S. Bonaventura, ut supr.,quoting turalem intellectus, as the schools have
S. August. de Libero Arbitrio, lib, iii. it from him.— Wiggers. {supr., p. 277.]
556 SERMON ΧΧΥΙ.
gripe them hideously. This light indeed may either by, first,
blindness, or secondly, delight in sinning, or thirdly, peremp-
tory resolvedness not to see, be for the present hindered, secun-
dum actum, from doing any good upon us. He that hath but a
veil before his eyes, so long cannot judge of colours ; he that
runs impetuously cannot hear any one that calls to stop him
in his career; and yet all the while the light shines, and the
voice shouts; and therefore when we find in Scripture some
men stupified by sin, others void of reason, we must not
reckon them absolutely so, but only for the present besotted.
And again, though they have lost their reason, as it moves
per modum deliberationis, yet not as per modum nature, their
reason which moves them by deliberation and choice to that
which is good, is perhaps quite put out or suspended; but
their reason which is an instinct of nature, a natural motion
of the soul to the end of its creation, remains in them though
it move not, like a ship at hull and becalmed is very still and
quiet, and though it stir not evidently, yet it hath its secret
heaves and plunges within us.
Now that the most ignorant, clouded, unnurtured brain
amongst you may reap some profit from this discourse, let
him but one minute of his life be at so much leisure as to
look into his own heart, and he shall certainly find within
him that which we have hitherto talked of, his own soul shall
yield him a comment to my sermon; and if he dare but once
to open his eyes, shall shew him the law and light of nature
in himself, which before he never dreamt of. Of those of
you that ever spared one minute from your worldly affairs to
think of your spiritual, there is one thought that suddenly
comes upon you, and makes short work of all that spiritual
care of yourselves. You conceive that you are of yourselves
utterly unable to understand, or think, or do any thing that
is good, and therefore you resolve it a great pain to no pur-
pose ever to go about so impossible a project. God must
work the whole business in you, you are not able of your-
selves so much as either to see, or move, and that is the busi-
ness which by chance you fell upon and as soon shook off
again, and being resolved you never had any eyes, you are
content to be for ever blind, unless, as it was wont to be in
the old tragedies, some θεὸς ἀπὸ μηχανῆς, some new super-
SERMON XXVI. 557
natural power come down and bore your foreheads, and
thrust and force eyes into your heads. It is a blessed desire
and gracious humility in any one to invoke God to every
thought they venture on, and not to dare to pretend to the
least sufficiency in themselves, but to acknowledge and desire
to receive all from God; but shall we therefore be so un-
gratefully religious as for ever to be a craving new helps and
succours, and never observe or make use of what we have
already obtained, as it is observed of covetous men, who
are always busied about their incomes, are little troubled with
disbursements, ἀκαταλλήλοις λήψεσι, καὶ δόσεσι', “with-
out any proportion betwixt their receipts and expenses.”
Shall we be so senseless as to hope that the contempt
of one blessing will be a means to procure us as many ?
I told you that God had written a law in the hearts of
every one of you, which once was able, and is not now
quite deprived of its power to furnish with knowledge
of good and evil; and although by original, and actual,
and habitual sin this inheritance be much impaired, this
stock of precepts drawn low; yet if you would but ob-
serve those directions which it would yet afford you, if
you would but practise whatever that divine light in your
souls should present and commend to you, you might with
some face petition God for richer abilities, and with better
confidence approach and beg, and expect the grace that
should perfect you to all righteousness. In the meantime,
bethink yourselves how unreasonable a thing it is that God
should be perpetually casting away of alms on those who
are resolved to be perpetually bankrupts; how it would be
reckoned prodigality of mercies, to purchase new lands for
him that scorns to make use of his inheritance. As ever
you expect any boon from God, look, I conjure you, what
you have already received, call in your eyes into your brains,
and see whether your natural reason there will not furnish
you with some kind of profitable, though not sufficient direc-
tions, to order your whole lives by; bring yourselves up to
that staidness of temper, as never to venture on any thing,
till you have asked your own soul’s advice whether it be to be
done or no; and if you can but observe its dictates, and keep
i Arrian. Dissert. Epicteti, [lib. ii. ον. 9. § 12.)
558 SERMON XXVI.
your hands to obey your head; if you can be content to ab-
stain when the soul within you bids you hold, you shall have
no cause to complain that God hath sent you impotent into
the world; but rather acknowledge it an invaluable mercy
of His, that hath provided such an eye within you to direct
you, if you will but have patience to see; such a curb to
restrain and prevent you, if thou wilt only take notice of its
checks. It is a thing that would infinitely please the reader
to observe, what a price the heathen themselves set upon this
light within them, which yet certainly was much more dim-
med and obscured in them by their idolatry and superstition,
than I hope it can be in any Christian soul by the unruliest
passion. Could ever any one speak more plainly and dis-
tinctly of it than the Pythagoreans and Stoics have done,
who represent conscience not only as a guide and moderator
of our actions, but as ém/tpo7rov δαίμονα, “atutelary spirit,” or
angel, or genius, which never sleeps or dotes, but is still pre-
sent and employed in our behalf? And this Arrian* specifies to
be the reasonable soul, which he therefore accounts of as a
part of God sent out of His own essence, μόριον καὶ ἀπο-
σπασμάτιον, “a piece or shred,” or as others more according
to modest truth call it, ἀπαύγασμα, “a ray or beam” of that
invisible sun, by which our dull, inactive, frozen bodies, after
the fall, were warmed and re-enlivened. Now if any one shall
make a diligent inquisition in himself, shall, as the philoso-
pher in his cynical humour, light a candle to no purpose, or
[Jer.v. 1.1 as the Prophet Jeremy, seek and make hue and cry after a
[John xx.
13. |
man through all Jerusalem, and yet not meet with him; if,
I say, any body shall search for this light in himself, and
find all darkness within, then will you say I have all this
while possessed you with some fancies and ideas, without any
real profit to be received from them; you will make that
complaint as the women for our Saviour, we went to seek
for Him, and when we went down all was dark and empti-
ness, “They have taken Him away, and I know not where
they have laid Him.” Nay, but the error is in the seeker,
not in my directions; he that would behold the sun must
stay till the cloud be over; he that would receive from the
fire, either light or warmth, must take the pains to remove
k [ Avvian, Dissertat. Epicteti, lib. i, c. 14. δὲ 6, 12.]
SERMON XXVI. 559
the ashes. There be some encumbrances which may hinder
the most active qualities in the world from working, and abate
the edge of the keenest metal. In sum, there is a cloud, and
gloom,and vail within thee, like that darkness on the face of the
deep, when the earth was yn3) 1ΠΠ, “ without form and void,” Gen. i. 2.
or like that at Lot’s door among the Sodomites, or that of [Gen. xix.
Egypt, thick and palpable; and this have we created to our- re a
selves, a sky full of tempestuous, untamed affections; this
cloud of vapours have we exhaled out of the lower part of our
soul, our sensitive faculty ; and therewith have we so filled
the air within us with sad, black meteors, that the sun in its
zenith, the height or pride of its splendour, would scarce be
able to pierce through it. So that for to make a search for
this light within thee, before thou hast removed this throng
and crowd of passions which encompass it, and still to com-
plain thou canst not meet with it, were to bring news that
the sun is gone out when a tempest hath only masked it, or
to require a candle to give thee light through a mud wall.
Thou must provide a course to clear the sky, and then thou
shalt not need to entreat the sun to shine on thee; especially
if this cloud fall down in a shower, if thou canst melt so
thick a viscous meteor as those corrupt affections are, into a
soft rain, or dew of penitent tears, thou mayest then be con-
fident of a fair bright sunshine. For I dare promise that
never humble, tender, weeping soul, had ever this light quite
darkened within it, but could at all times read and see the
will of God and the law of its creation, not drawn only, but
almost engraven and woven into its heart. For these tears
in our eyes will spiritually mend our sight; as whatever you
see through water, though it be represented somewhat dimly,
yet seems bigger and larger than if there were no water in the
way, according to that rule in the optics, whatever is seen
through a thicker medium seems bigger than it is. -And then
by way of use, shall we suffer so incomparable a mercy to be
cast away from us? Shall we only see and admire, and not
make use of it? Shall we fence, as it were, and fortify our out-
ward man with walls and bulwarks, that the inner man may
not shine forth upon it? Or shall we like silly improvident
flies make no other use of this candle but only to singe,
and burn, and consume ourselves by its flame; receive only
Mal. ii. 15.
560 SERMON XXVI.
so much light from it as will add to our hell and darkness?
It is a thing that the flintiest heart should melt at, to see
such precious mercies undervalued, such incomparable bless-
ings either contemned or only improved into curses. Arrian
calls those in whom this light of the soul is, as I shewed you,
clouded and obscured, νεκρὰ and capxiéia!, “dead trunks
and carcasses of flesh,” and to keep such men in order were
human laws provided, which he therefore calls ταλαυπώρους
τοὺς τῶν νεκρῶν νόμους", “ miserable hard laws to keep dead
men in compass,” and again, γῆν καὶ βάραθρον, “earth and
hell,” the places to which dead bodies are committed. And
certainly, if so, then by way of contrary, all the life that
we possess is but by obedience to this law within us, and it
is no longer to be called life, but either sleep, or death, or
lethargy, every minute that we move out of the circle of its
directions. There is not a step, or moment in our lives, but
we have a special use and need of this law to manage us;
every enterprise of our thoughts or actions will yield some
difficulty which we must hold up, and read, and judge of by
this candle; nay, sometimes we have need of a glass or in-
strument to contract the beams and light of it, or else it
would scarce be able to get through to our actions; passion,
and folly, and the atheism of our lives hath so thickened the
medium. Wherefore in brief, remember that counsel, “take
heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously with the
wife of his youth ;” the wife of his youth, i.e. saith Jerome’s
gloss", legem naturalem scriptam in corde, the law of nature
written in his heart, which was given him in the womb as a
wife and help to succour him. Let us set a value on this
polar star within us, which hath, or shall have an influence,
at least directions on all our actions; let us increase, and ἡ
nourish, and make much of the sparks still warm within us.
And if scholars and antiquaries prize nothing so high asa
fair manuscript or ancient inscription, let us not contemn
that which God’s own finger hath written within us, lest the
sin of the contempt make us more miserable, and the mercy
profit us only to make us inexcusable. And so I come to
1 [Epicteti Dissert., lib. i. ο. 9. § 19; n [S. Hieron. Comment. in Malach,
and lib. i. σ, 3. § 5, &e.] iii. 15. Op., tom. vi. p. 967, D.]
m (lib. 1. ο, 13. § 5.]
SERMON XXVI. 501]
my second part, the sin of contemning or rejecting this law.
For this cause He gave them up, 1. 6. because the contempt of
His law thus provoked Him.
The guilt arising from this contempt shall sufficiently be
cleared to you by observing and tracing of it, not through
every particular, but in general through all sorts of men
since the fall, briefly reducible to these three heads, first, the
heathens, secondly, the Jews, thirdly, present Christians ; and
then let every man that desires a more distinct light descend
and commune with his own heart, and so he shall make up
the observation.
The heathens’ sin will be much aggravated, if we consider
how they reckoned of this law, as the square, and rule, and
canon of their actions, and therefore they will be inexcusable
who scarce be ever at leisure to call to it to direct them,
when they had use of it. The stoic® calls it ἐπαγγελίαν ἀν-
θρώπου, the “promise that every man makes,” the obliga-
tion that he is bound in to nature at his shaping in the
womb, and upon which condition his reasonable soul is at his
conception demised to him; so that whosoever puts off this
obedience doth, as he goes on, renounce and even proclaim
his forfeiture of the very soul he lives by, and by every un-
natural, that is, sinful action, ὠπολύει τὸν ἄνθρωπον, “ de-
stroys the natural man” within him, and by a prodigious rege-
neration is in a manner transubstantiate into a beast of the
field. Which conceit many of them were so possessed with,
that they thought in earnest that it was ordinary for souls to
walk from men into cocks and asses, and the like, and return
again at nature’s appointment, as if this one contempt of the
law of nature were enough to unman them and make them
without a figure, comparable, nay, co-essential to the beasts
that perish. It were too long to shew you what a sense the
wisest of them had of the helps that light could afford them ;
so that one of them cries out confidently, gay πάντες οἱ
νόμοι», x.T.r. “If all other laws were taken out of the world,
we philosophers would still live as we do;” those directions
ο {Arrian. Epicteti Dissert., lib. 11, ἀναιρεθῶσιν, ὁμοίως Bidcowev.—Hesy-
e. 9. § 1.) chius, De Viris Claris. s. v. Aristippus.
P [οὗτος ἐρωτηθεὶς τί πλέον ἔχουσιν ap. Meursium. Op., tom. vii. p. 212. ]
οἱ φιλόσοφοι, ἔφη, ἄν πάντες οἱ νόμοι
HAMMOND, 00
Rom. i. 21.
ver. 24.
562 SERMON XXVI.
within us would keep us in as much awe as the most impe-
rious or severest lawgiver. And again, how they took no-
tice of the perverseness of men in refusing to make use of
it; for who, saith one, ever came into the knowledge of men
without this ἔμφυτος ἔννοια, this knowledge and discretion
of good and evil, as old in him as his soul? And yet who
makes any use of it in his actions? nothing so ordinary as to
betray, and declare that we have it, by finding fault, and
accusing vices in other men; by calling this justice, this
tyranny, this virtue, this vice in another, whilst yet we never
are patient to observe or discern aught of it in ourselves. Tis
ἡμῶν φείδεται, «.7.r., “ Whoever spares to call injustice
which he sees in another by its own name?” for his own
reason tells him it is so, and he must needs give it its title.
But when the case concerns his own person, when his pas-
sions counsel him against the law within him, then is he
content not to see, though it shine never so bright about
him; and this was one degree of their guilt, that they ob-
served the power of it in their speculations, and made use of
it also to censure and find fault with others; but seldom or
never strived to better themselves, or straighten their own
actions by it. Again, to follow our apostle’s argument, and
look more distinctly upon them in their particular chief sins
which this contempt produced in them, you shall find them
in the front to be idolatry and superstition, in the verses next
before my text; ‘‘ When they knew God they glorified Him
not as God,” “but changed His glory into an image,” &c.
And then we may cry out with Theodoret" in his θεραπευτ.
θεοχάρακτα πάλαι γράμματα διέφθειρεν ὁ δυσσεβείας πλάνος,
“the errors and vanities of their worship hath rased out all
the characters that God anciently had written in them.”
And can any man shew a greater contempt to a book, or
writing, than to tear, and scrape, and scratch out every let-
ter in it? The first voice of nature in the creature which it
uttered even in the cradle, when it was an infant in the world,
and therefore perhaps, as children are wont, not so plainly
and syllabically, and distinctly, as could have been wished,
is the acknowledgment and worship of one eternal God,
4 [Arrian. Epicteti Dissert., lib. ii. τ [Theodoret. Therapeut., p. 54. ed.
6. 1, ὃ 3.) Gaisford. ]
SERMON XXVI. 563
Creator of that soul we breathe by, and world we live in; as
one simple, incorporeal, everlasting essence; and thus far,
no doubt, could nature proclaim in the heart of every Gen-
tile, though it was by many of them either silenced or not
hearkened to, which if it were doubted of, might be deduced
out of the 19th verse of this chapter, ‘God hath shewed unto Rom. i. 19.
them,” &c. Now this light shining not equally in all eyes,
some being more overspread with a film of ignorance, stupid
conditions and passions, and the like, yet certainly had enough
to express their contempt of it, “so that they are without ver. 20.
excuse.” All that would ever think of it, and were not blind
with an habit of sottishness, acknowledged a God, yet none
would think aright of Him. Some would acknowledge Him
a simple essence, and impossible to be described or wor-
shipped aright by any image, as Varro an heathen observes,
that the city and religion of old Rome continued one hundred
and seventy years without any images of the gods init’. Yet
even they which acknowledged Him simple from all corporeity
and composition, would not allow Him single from plurality.
Jupiter and Saturn, and the rest of their shoal of gods, had
already got in and possessed both their temples and their
hearts. In sum, their understandings were so gross within
them, being fattened and incrassate with magical phantasms,
that let the truth within them say what it would, they could
not conceive the deity without some quantity, either cor-
poreity or number; and either multiply this god into many,
or make that one god corporeous. And then all this while
how plainly and peremptorily, and fastidiously, they rejected
the guidance of nature, which in every reasonable heart coun-
selled, nay, proclaimed the contrary; how justly they pro-
voked God’s displeasure and desertion, by their forsaking
and provoking Him first by their foolish imaginations, I
need not take pains to insist on. Aristotle* observes in his
Rhetoric that a man that hath but one eye loves that very
dearly, ἀγάπητον καὶ μόνον, and sets a far higher price on it,
is much more tender over it than he that hath two; so he
that hath but one son cannot choose but be very fond of him,
5 [S. Origen. c. Celsum, lib. i. ὃ 4, (ad init.) ]
sq. Op., tom. i. p. 323. Clemens Alex- τ [Aristot, Rhet., lib. i. c. 7. ad fin. ]
andr. Strom., lib. 1, c. 15. § 71. p. 359.
002
Amos viii.
10; Zech.
xii. 10.
[ Wisd.
xvii. 14]
Gen. ii. 17.
564 SERMON XXVI.
and the greatest lamentation that can be expressed, is but a
shadow of that which is for one’s only son, as may appear,
when it is observed that μονογενὴς and ἀγάπητος, the “ only-
begotten” and the “beloved” are taken in Scripture promis-
cuously as signifying all one. And then, what a price should
the heathen have set upon this eye of nature, being μονόφ-
θαλμοι, having no other eye to see by? having neither Scrip-
ture, nor the Spirit, those two other glorious eyes of the world,
to enlighten them; and therefore being sure, by the contemn-
ing and depriving themselves of this light, to turn all into hor-
rible darkness. It would strike a man into agony of pity and
amazement to see a world of Gentiles for many years thus
imprisoned, and buried in a dungeon and grave of invincible
idolatrous ignorance; and from thence engaged in inevitable
hell, as it is in the book of Wisdom, and all this directly by
contemning this first and only-begotten light in them, which
God set in the firmaments of their hearts, to have led and
directed them in a more comfortable way. Aud this, or as
bad, is every unregenerate man’s case exactly, if they be not
forewarned by their elder brethren the heathens’ example ;
as we shall anon have more leisure to insist on.
Secondly, among the Jews, under which name I contain
all the people of God, from Adam to Christ, it is a lament-
able contemplation to observe, and trace the law and the
contempt of it; like a Jacob at the heels supplanting it in
every soul which it came to inhabit. Those characters of
verum and bonum which in Adam were written in a statelier
copy, and fairer manuscript than our slow undervaluing con-
ceits can guess at; nay, afterwards explained with a particu-
lar explication to his particular danger ; “ΟΥ̓ the tree of know-
ledge,” &c., “thou shalt not eat.” Yet how were they by
one slender temptation of the serpent presently sullied and
blurred! so that all the aqua fortis and instruments in the
world will never be able to wash ont or erase that blot; or
ever restore that handwriting in our hearts to the integrity
and beauty of that copy in its primitive estate. And since,
when by that sin darkness was in a manner gone over their
hearts, and there remained in them only some tracks and
reliques of the former structure, the glory whereof was like
that of the second temple, nothing comparable to the beauty
SERMON XXVI. 565
of the first; instead of weeping with a loud voice, as many
of the priests and Levites did, or building, or repairing of it
with all alacrity, as all Israel did through that whole book ;
their whole endeavour and project was even to destroy the
ruins, and utterly finish the work of destruction which Adam
had begun, as being impatient of that shelter which it would
yet, if they would but give it leave, afford them. Thus
that συντήρησις and συνείδησις, two sparks of that primitive
sacred flame, which came from heaven still alive and warm,
though weak in them, intended by God to direct them in
His will, and for ever set either as their funeral pile or their
ordeal fire, their punishment or acquittal, either as their
devil or their God, to accuse, or else excuse them, were both
in their practice neglected and slighted; nay, in a manner
oppressed and stifled. For any natural power of doing good,
God knows, it was utterly departed; and therefore this thin
measure of knowledge or judgment betwixt good and evil
that was left them (which my awe to God’s sincere love of
His creature makes me hope and trust He bestowed on them
for some other end than only to increase their condemna-
tion, to stand them in some stead in their lives, to restrain
and keep them in from being extremely sinful;) this, I
say, they horribly rejected, and stopt their ears against that
charmer in their own bosoms, and would not hear that soft
voice which God had still placed within them, to upbraid
their ways and reprove their thoughts. What a provocation
this was of God’s justice, what an incentive of His wrath,
may appear by that terrible promulgation of the ten com-
mandments at mount Sinai. They despised the law in their
hearts, where God and nature whispered it in calmly, insen-
sibly, and softly; and therefore now it shall be thundered
in their ears in words, and those boisterous ones, at which
the “whole mount quaked greatly,” Exod. xix. 18. Andin
the 16th verse, it must be ushered with variety of dismal me-
teors upon the mount, and the voice of a “ trumpet exceeding
loud, so that all the people that was in the camp trembled.”
Thus upon their contempt and peevishness was this manu-
script put in print, this privy seal turned into a procla-
mation, and that a dreadful one, bound and subscribed, with
a “Cursed is he that continues not in every tittle of it to
ΤΥ 11],
12.
Exod. xix.
18.
ver. 16.
[1 Sam.
xxiv. 10.]
Exod. xxx,
12,
John xi. 48,
566 SERMON XXVI.
perform it.” Meanwhile the matter is not altered, but only
the dispensation of it. That which till then had taught men
in their hearts, and had been explained from tradition, from
father to son, Adam instructing Seth, and Seth Enoch, in
all righteousness, is now put into tables, that they may have
eyes to see, that would not have hearts to understand, that
the perverse may be convinced, and that he that would not
before see himself bound, may find and read himself accursed.
And after all this, yet is not the old law within them either
cast away or cancelled by the promulgation of the other; for
all the book is printed, the old copy is kept in archivis,
though, perhaps, as it always was, neglected, soiled, and
moth-eaten, and he shall be censured either for ambition
or curiosity, that shall ever be seen to enquire, or look after
it. Still I say, throughout all their ways, and arts, and
methods of rebellions, it twinged, and pricked within, as
God’s judgments attended them without, and as often as
sword, or plague wounded them, made them acknowledge
the justice of God, that thus rewarded their perverseness.
Nay, you shall see it sometimes break out against them,
when perhaps the written law spake too softly for them to
be understood. Thus did David’s heart smite him when he
had numbered the people; though there was no direct com-
mandment against mustering or enrolment, yet his own con-
science told him that he had done it either for distrust, or
for ostentation, and that he had sinned against God in trust-
ing and glorying in that arm of flesh, or paid not the tribute
appointed by God on that occasion. To conclude this dis-
course of the Jews, every rebellion and idolatry of theirs was
a double breach of a double law, the one in tables, the other
in their heart ; and could they have been freed from the kiil-
ing letter of the one, the wounding sense of the other would
still have kept them bound, as may appear in that business
of crucifying Christ, where no human law-giver or magistrate
went about to deter them from shedding His blood, or deny-
ing His miracles, yet many of their own hearts apprehended,
and violently buffeted, and scourged, and tormented them.
At one time when they are most resolved against Him, the
whole senate is suddenly pricked, and convinced within, and
express it with a “surely this man doth many miracles.”
SERMON XXVI. 567
At another time at the top and complement of the business, [ Mat.
Pilate is deterred from condemning, and though the fear of **¥ 25]
the people made him valiant, yet, as if he contemned this
voice of his conscience against his will, with some reluctance,
he washes his hands when he would have been gladder to
quench the fire in his heart, which still burnt and vexed him.
Lastly, when Judas had betrayed and sold Him, and no man [ver. 3, 4,
made hue and cry after him, his conscience was his pursuer, ay
judge, and executioner, persecuted him out of the world,
haunted him, would not suffer him to live, whom otherwise
the law of the country would have reprieved, till a natural
death had called for him.
Lastly, even we Christians are not likely to clear ourselves
of this bill; it is much to be feared, that if our own hearts
are called to witness, our judge will need no farther indict-
ments. It was an heathen speech* concerning this rule of our
lives and actions, that to study it hard, to reform and repair
all obliquities and defects in it, and then βεβαιοῦν, to set it
up strong and firm as a pillar in our hearts, was the part and
office of a philosopher; and then afterwards to make use
of it in our whole conversation, this was the part of a vir-
tuous man complete and absolute. And how then will our
contempt be aggravated, if Christianity, which Clemens calls
spiritual philosophy, and is to be reckoned above all moral
perfections, hath yet wrought neither of these effects in us!
if we have continued so far from straightening, or setting up,
or making use of this rule, that we have not so much as ever
enquired or marked whether there be any such thing left
within us or no! TheodoretY in his second @epam. is very
passionate in the expression of this contempt of the τὸ νοερὸν
pas τὴς ἀληθείας, “the light of truth shining in our under-
standings.” ‘There be a sort of birds, saith he, that fly or
move only in the night, called from thence night-birds, and
night-ravens, which are afraid of light, as either an enemy
to spy, to assault, or betray them; but salute, and court, and
make love to darkness as their only queen and mistress of
x [Καὶ τὸ φιλοσοφεῖν τοῦτό ἐστιν, —Arrian. Epicteti Dissertat., lib. ii.
ἐπισκέπτεσθαι καὶ βεβαιοῦν τοὺς kavd- ο, 11. ὃ 24.]
vas. τὸ δ᾽ ἤδη χρῆσθαι τοῖς ἐγνωσμένοις, Υ [Theodoret. Therapeut. ii. p. 58.
τοῦτο TOU καλοῦ καὶ ἀγαθοῦ ἔργον ἐστίν. ed. Gaisf. |
568 SERMON XXVI.
their actions, ὡς σωτήριον, as a creature sent on purpose to
preserve them; and these, saith he, deserve not to be chid
but pitied, for nature at first appointed them this condition
of life, ἀπεκλήρωσεν, it is their birthright and inheritance,
and therefore nobody will be angry with them for living on
it; of δὲ αὐθαιρέτως, x.7.r.; but for them who were made
creatures of light, and, had it not been for their wilfulness,
had still continued light in the Lord, who are altogether
encompassed and environed with light, light of nature, light
of reason, light of religion, nay, the most glorious asterism,
or conjunction of lights in the world, the light of the gospel
to walk in; for these men merely out of perverseness of wilful
hearts, to hate and abjure, and defy this light, to run out of
the world almost for fear of it, to be for ever a soliciting
and worshipping of darkness, as Socrates was said to adore
the clouds’, this is such a sottishness, that the stupidest ele-
ment under heaven would naturally scorn to be guilty of;
for never was the earth so peevish, as to forbid the sun when
it should shine on it, or to slink away, or subduce itself from
its rays. And yet this is our case, beloved, who do more
amorously, and flatteringly court, and woo, and solicit dark-
ness, than ever the heathens adored the sun. Not to wan-
der out of the sphere my text hath placed me in, to shew
how the light of the gospel and Christianity is neglected by
us, our guilt will lie heavy enough on us, if we keep us to
the light only of natural reason within us. How many sins
do we daily commit, which both nature and reason abhor
and loathe! How many times do we not only unman, but
even uncreature ourselves! Aristotle* observes, that that by
which any thing is known first,that which doth distinguish one
thing from another a priore, ἀρχὴ λέγεται, is to be called
the beginning or cause of that thing; and that the light of
reason distinguishing one action from another, being the
first thing that teaches me that this is good, that otherwise
may from thence be termed the beginning of every reason-
able action in us, and then wherever this cause or beginning
is left out and wanting, there the thing produced is not so
called a positive act, or proper effect, but a defect, an abor-
tion, or still-born frustrate issue; and of this condition in-
z [Aristoph. Nubes. y. 253.] a [Aristot. Metaph., A. c. 1. ad init. ]
SERMON XXVI. 569
deed is every sin in us. Every action where this law
within us is neglected, is not truly an action, but a passion,
a suffering or a torment of the creature. Thus do we not
so much live and walk, which note some action, as lie en-
tranced, asleep, nay, dead in sin; by this perverseness it is
perpetual night with us, nay, we even die daily; our whole
life is but a multiplied swoon or lethargy, in which we re-
main stupid, breathless, senseless, till the day of death or
judgment with a hideous voice affrights and rouses us, and
we find ourselves awake in hell; and so our dark souls
having a long while groped wilfully in the sun, are at last
led to an everlasting, inevitable darkness, whither the mercy
or rays of the sun can never pierce; where it will be no
small accession to our torment, to remember and tremble at
that light which before we scorned. Thus, I say, do we ina
manner uncreature ourselves, and by the contempt of this
law of our creation, even frustrate and bring to nothing our
creation itself, and this is chiefly by sins of sloth, and stupid,
sluggish, unactive vices, which, as I said, make our whole
life a continued passion, never daring, or venturing, or at-
tempting to act or do any thing in Church or commonwealth,
either toward God or our neighbour; and of such a con-
ditioned man nobody will be so charitable as to guess he
hath any soul, or light of reason in him, because he is so
far from making use of it, unless it be such a soul as Tully®
saith a swine hath, which serves it only instead of salt, to
keep it from stinking. For it is Aristotle’s° observation, that
every one of the elemeuts, besides the earth, was by some
philosopher or other defined to be the soul. Some said the
soul was fire, some that it was air, some water, but never
any man was so mad, as to maintain the earth to be it, be-
cause it was so heavy and unwieldy. So then this heavy,
motionless, unactive Christian, this clod of earth, hath, as
I said, uncreatured himself, and by contemning this active
reason within him, even deprived himself of his soul. Again,
how ordinary a thing is it to unman ourselves by this con-
tempt of the directions of reason, by doing things that no
man in his right mind would ever have patience to think of !
» [Cicero, De Nat. Deorum, lib. ii. c. 64. ]
© [Aristot. De Anima, lib. i. c. 2.]
Gen. i. 25.
ver. 26. 28.
570 SERMON XXVI.
Beloved, to pass by those which we call unnatural sins, i. 6. so
in the highest degree, as too horrid for our nature, set down
in the latter end of this chapter, for all Christian ears to
glow and tingle at, and I had hoped for all English spirits
to abhor and loathe; to pass these, I say, our whole life al-
most affords minutely sins which would not argue us men,
but some other creatures. There be few things we do in our
age, which are proper peculiar acts of men; one man gives
himself to eating and drinking, and bestows his whole care
on that one faculty, which they call the vegetative, growing
faculty ; and then what difference is there betwixt him and
a tree, whose whole nature it is to feed and grow? Certainly
unless he hath some better employment, he is at best but
ζωόφυτον, a plant-animal, whose shape would perhaps per-
suade you that it hath some sense or soul in it, but its
actions betray it to be a mere plant, little better than an
artichoke or cabbage; another goes a little higher, yet not
far; doth all that his sense presents to him, suffers all that
his sensitive faculties lust and.rage to exercise at freedom‘ ;
is as fierce as the tiger, as lustful as the goat, as ravenous
as the wolf, and the like; and all the beasts of the field, and
fowls of the air, be but several emblems and _ hieroglyphics
concurring to make up his character; carries a wilderness
about him, as many sins as the nature of a sensitive creature
is capable of; and then who will stick to compare this man
to the beasts that perish? For it is Theophilus’© note, that
the cattle and beasts of the field were created the same day
with man, to note θηρία τίνων ἀσεβούντων, the brutish con-
dition of some men, and that therefore the blessing was not
bestowed on them, but reserved for the man which should
“have the dominion over them.” In sum, every action which
reason, or Scripture, or God’s Spirit guides not in us, is to
be called the work of some other creature of one of these
three sorts; either earthly, the work of a plant, or sensual,
the work of a brute‘, or thirdly, above the condition of both
these, devilish.
4 [πῶς δὲ οὐκ ἄλογον πολλοὺς τῶν © Theophilus ad Autolyc., lib. ii.
ἀνθρώπων ἐπ᾽ αἰσθήσει μόνον ζῶντας [ὃ 17. p. 361, D.}
ὁρῶντας, νοῦν δὲ καὶ λόγον οὐκ ἔχον- f Jamblichus, Protrept., p. -145.
τας, kK.7.A.—Porphyt., De Abstinentia, [Symb. xvi.]}
lib. iii. § 19.]
SERMON XXVI. 571
Thus do you see the sin of the contempt of the light of na-
ture, which although it be dimmed in us by our corruption,
yet shined so bright in the heathen, that they were left with-
out excuse; in the Jews, that even their own hearts accused
them for their rebellions; and in us Christians, that unless
we move according to its directions, we are fallen below the
condition of men, almost of creatures. It were now su-
perfluous further to demonstrate it, our time will be better
spent if we close with some use of it; and that will prove
manifold, 1. by way of caution, not to deify, or exalt too high,
or trust in this light of nature. It was once a perfect glori-
ous rule, but is now distorted and defaced ; it once was light
in the Lord, almost an angel of light; it shone as the sun in
the firmament, in majesty and full brightness, but is now only
as the moon, pale and dim, scarce able to do us any service,
unless it borrows some rays from the Sun of Righteousness.
The fall hath done somewhat with it, I know not what to call
it, either much impaired it and diminished its light in its es-
sence, or else much encumbered or oppressed it in its opera-
tions, as a candle under a veil, or lantern, which, though it
burn and shine as truly as on a candlestick, yet doth not so
much service in enlightening the room; the soul within us is
much changed, either is not in its essence so perfect, and ac-
tive, and bright, as once it was; or else being infused in a
sufficient perfection, is yet terribly overcast with a gloom and
cloud of corruptions, that it can scarce find any passage to
get through, and shew itself in our actions; for the “ corrup- Wisd. x.
tible body presseth down the soul,” &c. And from this cau- ἷ
tion grow many lower branches, whence we may gather some
fruit ; as in the second place, infinitely to humble ourselves
before God for the first sin of Adam, which brought this
darkness on our souls, and account it not the meanest or
slightest of our miseries, that our whole nature is defiled,
and bruised, and weakened ; to aggravate every circumstance
and effect of that sin against thyself, which has so liberally
afforded fuel to the flames of lust, of rage, and wild desire, and
thereby, without God’s gracious mercy, to the flames of hell.
This is a most profitable point, yet little thought on ; and there-
fore would deserve a whole sermon to discuss to you. Thirdly,
to observe and acknowledge the necessity of some brighter
572 SERMON XXVI.
light than this of nature can afford us, and with all the care
and vigilancy of our hearts, all the means that Scripture will
lend us, and at last with all the importunities and groans,
and violence of our souls, to petition and solicit, and urge
God’s illuminating Spirit to break out and shine on us. To
undertake to interpret any ancient author, requires, say the
grammarians, a man of deep and various knowledge, because
there may be some passage or other in that book, which will
refer to every sort of learning in the world, whence it is ob-
served that the old scholiasts and ἐξηγηταὶ, were most exqui-
site scholars. Thus, certainly, will not any ordinary skill serve
turn to interpret and explain many dark sayings, which were
at first written in the book of our hearts, but are now almost
past reading ; only that omniscient Spirit,that hath no shadow
of ignorance, the finger that first writ, must be beseeched
to read and point out the riddle. We must make use of
that rotten staff of nature, as far as its strength will bear,
and that very gingerly too, never daring to lean or lay our
whole weight upon it, lest it either wound with its splinter,
or else break under us; our help and stay, and subsistence,
and trust must be in the Lord, our eyes must wait on His
enlightening Spirit, and never lose a ray that falls from it.
Fourthly, to clear up as much as we can, and re-enliven this
light within us; and that, first,
By stirring up and blowing, and so nourishing every spark
we find within us. The least particle of fire left in a coal,
may by pains be improved into a flame; it is held possible
to restore, or at least preserve for a time any thing that is
not quite departed. If thou findest but a spark of religion
in thee, which saith, a God is to be worshipped; care, and
sedulity, and the breath of prayers may in time by this in-
flame the whole man into a bright fire of zeal towards God.
In brief, whatever thou doest, let not any the least atom of
that fire, which thou once feelest within thee, ever go out;
quench not the weakest motion, or inclination even of rea-
son towards God or goodness; how unpolished soever this
diamond be, yet if it do but glisten, it is too precious to be
cast away. And then, secondly,
By removing all hinderances or encumbrances that may any
way weaken oroppress it, and these you have learntto be corrupt
SERMON XXVI. 573
affections. That democracy, and crowd, and press, and com-
mon people of the soul, raises a tumult in every street within
us, that no voice of law or reason can be heard. If you will
but disgorge and purge the stomach, which hath been thus
long oppressed, if you will but remove this cloud of crudities,
then will the brain be able to send some rays down to the
heart, which till then are sure to be caught up by the way,
anticipated, and devoured. For the naked simplicity of the
soul, the absence of all disordered passions, is that οἰκεία εὐεξία
τῆς ψυχῆς, saith Aphrodiseus®, that kindly, familiar, good
temper of the soul, by which it is able to find out and judge
of truth. In brief, if thou canst crop thy luxuriant passions,
if thou canst either expel or tame all the wild beasts within
thee, which are born to devour any thing which is weak or
innocent, then will that mild voice within thee, in the cave,
take heart and shew itself. In the mean time this hurry of
thy senses drowns that reason, and thou canst not hope to
see, as long as like old Tobit, the dung and white film doth
remain upon thine eyes. If thou canst use any means to
dissolve this dung of affections, which an habit of sin hath
baked within thee, the scales will fall off from thine eyes, and
the blind Tobit shall be restored to his sight. In brief, do
but fortify thy reasonable soul against all the undermining,
and faction, and violence of these sensual passions, do but
either depose, or put to the sword that atheistical tyrant and
usurper, as Jamblichus calls the affections, do but set reason
in the chair, and hear and observe his dictates, and thou
hast disburthened thyself of a great company of weights and
pressures ; thou wilt be able to look more like a man, to hold
thy head more courageously, and bend thy thoughts more
resolutely toward heaven; and I shall expect, and hope, and
pray, and almost be confident that if thou dost perform sin-
cerely what thy own soul prompts thee to, God’s Spirit is
nigh at hand to perfect, and crown, and seal thee up to the
day of redemption.
In the next place, thou mayst see thine own guilts the
clearer, call thyself to an account even of those things which
thou thinkest thou art freest from; that which the Apostle
in this chapter and part of my discourse hath charged the
8 [Cf. Alex. Aphrodis. in Aristot. Top., lib. i. f. 17. Ald.]
Wisd. xiii.
17, sq.
574 SERMON XXVI.
heathens with ; and if thou lookest narrowly I am afraid thou
wilt spy thine own picture in that glass, and find thyself in
many things as arrant a Gentile as any of them. For any
sincere care of God, or religion, how few of us are there that
ever entertained so unpleasant a guest in their hearts; we go
to church, and so did they to their temples; we pray, and they
sacrificed ; they washed and bathed themselves before they
durst approach their deities, and we come in our best clothes
and cleanest linen; but for any further real service we mean
towards God there, for any inward purity of the heart, for any
sincere worship of our soul, we are as guiltless, as free from
it, we do as much contemn and scorn it, as ever did any hea-
then. Again, what man of us is not in some kind guilty even
of their highest crime, idolatry ? Some of them took the brain
to be sacred, ἐγκέφαλος ἱερὸς, saith Athenzeus*; and there-
fore hearing some cry God help when one sneezed, the igno-
rant sort worshipped that noise as an expression of a deity
in the brain ; and so, as senselessly, many of us deify our own
brains, and adore every thing that ever comes out of them.
Every conceit of ours must be like the birth of Jupiter's
brain, a Minerva at least; be we never so ignorant or me-
chanical, every device, every fancy of our own—especially
in matters of religion—is straight of divine authority; and
having resolved ourselves the children of God, every crotchet
we fall upon must be necessarily theopneust, and inspired,
and others accused for irreligious, or singular, that will not
as soon give homage to it. In sum, every imagination be-
comes an image, and the artificer deifies his own handiwork,
forgetting that he made it, as it is described in the thirteenth
of Wisdom toward the end; and this is one kind of idolatry.
Again, who is there that hath not some pleasure in his heart
which takes place of God there? They had their sun and
moon, most glorious creatures, their heroes, whose virtues had
even deified their memory, and silly men they admired and
could not choose but worship. The devil, and a humour of
superstition customary in them, feed and bribed the law in
their hearts to hold its peace, and not recall them. But how
basely have we outgone their vilest worships! How have we
outstript them! Let but one appearance of gain, like that
h [Athenzus, lib. ii. ὃ 72. p. 66. ed. Casaub.]
SERMON XXVI. 575
golden calf of the Israelites; a beautiful woman, like that
Venus of the heathens; nay, in brief, whatever image or re-
presentation of delight thy own lusts can propose thee, let it
but glance, or glide by thee, and Quis non incurvavit ? Shew
me aman that hath not at some time or other fallen down
and worshipped. In sum, all the lower part of the soul or
carnal affections are but a picture of the city of Athens,
“wholly given to idolatry.” The basest, unworthiest plea- Acts xvii.
sure or content in the world, that which is good for nothing 10:
else, the very refuse of the refuse, is become an idol, and Wisd. xiii.
hath its shrines in some heart or other; and we crouch and 15,
bow, and sacrifice to it, and all this against the voice of our
soul, and nature within us, if we would suffer it to speak
aloud, or but hearken to its whisperings; φύσεως yap τροφὴ,
ἐπιθυμίας ἡδονὴ, saith Philoponus', Nature only bids us feed
ourselves with sufficient, lust brought in superfluity and plea-
sure. But this only by the way, lest you might think that
part of my sermon concerning the heathens’ contempt of this
law, did belong little to you, and so might have been spared.
Lastly, not to lade every part of my former discourse with
its several use, or application, take but this one more. If
this light shines but dimly within us, then let us so much
the more not dare contemn it. That master that speaks but
seldom, then surely deserves to be obeyed; he that is slow in
his reproofs, certainly hath good reason when he falls foul
with any body. If Croesus’ dumb son in Herodotus *, seeing
one come to kill his father, shall by violence break the string
of his tongue that formerly hindered his speech, and he that
never spake before roar out an ἄνθρωπε, μὴ κτεῖνε Κροῖσον,
“ Sir, kill not Croesus,” I wonder not that the Persian held
his hand; a very barbarian would be amazed and stopped by
such a prodigy; it must needs be an odious thing when the
child which can scarce speak expresses indignation. Where-
fore if ever our bestial soul, that of our sense, shall seduce us
to any thing that our manly soul, that of our reason, which
is now somewhat decrepit, and dim-sighted, shall yet espy
and find fault with; if in any enterprise this natural law
within us shall give the check, let us suddenly remove our
project, and not dare to reject such fatherly, sage admonish-
' [Philoponus, in Aristot. de Anima, f. 4. ] « { Herod., lib. 1, ο, 85, ]
[Judg. i.]
576 SERMON XXVI.
ments ; if all the means in the world can help to avoid it, let
us never fall into the snare. And if at thy audit with thy
own soul, and examination of thyself, amongst the root of
thy customary ignorant sins,—and, O Lord deliver me from
my secret faults—if in that heap and chaos, thy own heart
can pick out many of this nature, and present them to thee,
which it before forewarned thee of; then let the saltest, most
briny tear in thy heart be called out to wash off this guilt ;
let the saddest, mortified thought thou canst strain for, be
accounted but a poor unproportionable expiation. Think of
this seriously, and if all this will nothing move you, I cannot
hope that any farther rhetoric, if I had it to spare, would do
any good upon you. Only I will try one suasory more, which
being somewhat rough may chance to frighten you, and that
is, the punishment that here expects this contempt, and that
a dismal hideous one, all the wild savage devourers in the
wilderness, vile affections, which punishment together with
the inflicter and manner of inflicting it, are the last parts of
my discourse, of which together in a word; “ God gave them
up to vile affections.”
A punishment indeed; and all the fiends of hell could not
invent or wish a man a greater; there is not a more certain
presage of a πανωλεθρία, or total subversion of body and
soul, not a more desperate prognostic in the world. It is
observed in Photius!, as a sure token that Jerusalem should
be destroyed, because punishment came upon it in a chain,
every link drew on another, no intermission or discontinu-
ance of judgments, τῷ γὰρ λιμῷ ὁ λοιμὸς, K.T.rA. A single
judgment that brings no train after it is cheaply entertained,
and is therefore called not a calamity, but a visitation; but
when one plague shall invade, shall supplant another; when
the pestilence shall fright out the famine, and the sword
pursue the pestilence, that neither may slay all, but each
join in the glory of the spoil; then must the beholder ac-
knowledge θεομηνίας ἔργον, that God is resolved to make
them the scene of His rage, not only of His wrath. ‘Thus also
in the spiritual κρίσις of the estate of the soul, some sins may
be suffered to invade us, and stick as did the Amorites, to
goad our sides, not destroy but humble us. But when sins
' [Photius in Biblioth., p. 36. ed. Heschel. |
SERMON XXVI. til
shall come like gaol birds linked and chained together, when
our corruptions and insolent tyrannical passions shall make
us contemn the light and law of reason and nature; when
that contempt shall bring forth idolatry, and the like, either
worship of idol gods, or vain conceits, or imaginary delights,
every lust of our baser soul; then can it not be expected that
God will have so little to do, as to take any more care of us,
that He will have so much mercy as even to punish us any
longer. The next voice that we can expect is that horrible
mercy of His, “Why should you be smitten any more?”
Any restraint either of chastisement or instruction would
be scarce seen upon us, and therefore it is but lost labour to
beat the air, or to lay stripes upon the sea with Xerxes™. The
height of God’s wrath in this world is but our just reward,
and that is desertion, or dereliction, and giving us over, and
giving us up, which will suddenly bring us to that which our
corrupt nature posts after, all vile affections.
The issue of all is this; that those that contemn God’s
ordinary restraints, God ordinarily leaves to themselves, and
suffers them to run into most horrible sins. It is justice
that they which delight in error, should be let alone in their
course, that they may see and acknowledge the error of their
delight, that they which have contemned God’s voice, and
nature’s within them, should be forsaken and left without
either, ungodly, unnatural; that they which lulled their
reasonable soul into a lethargy, for fear it should awake
them, or disturb their delights, should not have life enough
without it, ever to awake or rouse themselves or it; that
they which have maliciously, and contemptuously put out
the sun, should for ever suffer a continued night. It is
Hippocrates" observation that the Africans are very libidi-
nous; they are neither hardy nor valiant, nor laborious,
ἀλλὰ Kpatéew τὴν ἡδονὴν, lust hath so effeminated them,
that they are fit for nothing but for softness; and there-
fore, saith he, πολύμορφα γίνεται τὰ ἐν τοῖς θηρίοις, there
be among them beasts of all sorts of strange shapes, the
heat and violence of the same lust makes the very beasts
unnatural, the confusion of species is ordinary among them ;
m [ Herod., lib. vii. c. 45.] cis, tom. i. p. 349. Med. Gree., tom.
n {Hippocrates De aqua, aere et lo- xxi. ed. Kiihn.]
HAMMOND. P Ρ
Isaiah i. 5.
578 SERMON XXVI.
and so almost every birth a monster; nature is almost lost
among them, and many beasts may be found in Africa,
which never had any of their kind in the ark; Africa semper
aliquod apportat novi, whosoever hath a mind to a strange
sight, there he shall have store of them. ‘Thus is it in the
soul, if the upper, the manly part of it be overswelled with
lust, it straight becomes effeminate, and enervate, hath
neither strength, nor sinews, nor courage for any undertak-
ing; and then the beasts of the field, the lower, baser,
sensual faculties of the soul are not only lusty, but out-
rageous; having no keeper to govern them, they become
wild; scorn any limits, or bounds of nature, do every day
conceive horrid, unnatural, vile imaginations, and every sea-
son grow big, and bring forth monsters,—monstrous oaths,
monstrous delights, monstrous vanities. Some new art or
trick of sinning that was never heard of before, is invented
against every solemn season of our jollity, and this we carry
about, and shew, and brag of as a new creature, or strange
sight, and get a great deal of applause, and admiration, and
perhaps some money by the employment. It were too long
to point out the several sorts of these vile affections, which
contempt of this light hath produced in every one of us;
only let us strive and strain, and stretch the eyes that are
left us to examine, and observe every degree and symptom,
and prognostic of them in ourselves, and never leave poring
till we have pierced through that carnal security that blinded
us, and fully humble ourselves in a sense of that desperate
estate, and almost the hell that we are fallen blindfold into.
And if we are still blinded, still unable to see, or move, or
relieve ourselves, let us then lay hold of the next post or
pillar we meet with, and there fix, and dwell, and weep, and
pray to that omnipotent Physician of our souls, that restorer
of reasonable creatures, that He will by some spiritual eye-
water recover us to that sense. It is impossible, saith Jobius®,
of... οὐδὲν ἕτερον διαλαμβάνει, ἤ φώσασθαι' καὶ ds ἔδει τὸν ἀληθῆ καὶ
ὅτι τῶν πρεπωδεστάτων ἣν, τὴν ἀπαράλ-
λακτον καὶ φυσικὴν εἰκόνα τοῦ πατρὸς
ἡμᾶς τοὺς κατ᾽ εἰκόνα μὲν γεγονότας,
τὴν δὲ χαρακτῆρα κιβδηλεύσαντας, ταύ-
Thy ἡμᾶς ἀποκαθᾶραί τε τῶν κηλιδωμά-
των, καὶ εἰς τὸ ἀρχαῖον κάλλος ἀναμορ-
ἐνυπόστατον τοῦ θεοῦ σοφίαν τοὺς εἰς
ἀλογίαν παρατραπέντας καὶ πρὸς τὸν
κτηνώδη βίον ἀπονεύσαντας, ἀπάλλαξαί
τε τῆς ἀλογίας, καὶ πρὸς τὸ νοερὸν ἐπα-
ναγαγεῖν &&lwua,—Photius Biblioth.,
p- 601. ed. Hoeschel. }
SERMON XXVI. 579
for any one to restore us to the image of the Father, which
was once on us, but Him only who was the eternal image of
the Father, He only could ἀπάλλαξαι τὴς ἀλογίας, καὶ πρὸς
TO νοερὸν ἐπαναγαγεῖν ἀξίωμα, turn out that unreasonable
blind soul within us, made up of our sins which move us,
and reduce us to the dignity of reasonable creatures. He
hath already by His incarnation, delivered us from one long
night, the dark gloom of our heathen ancestors; O that He
would be born again spiritually in our souls, to deliver us
from other more Cimmerian darkness, the night and hell of
habituate sin, wherein we grope! He once breathed on us
the breath of life to make us men; O that He would again but
breathe on us the τὸ ἅγιον πνεῦμα, His holy breath, His
hallowing breath, His breath of holiness to make us saints!
It is He that must prevent us with His Spirit, or else we run
headlong into all vile affections.
O that He would but sanctify us! and then the most plau-
sible flattering sin in the world, nay, the most boisterous,
impetuous lust, should not be able to tyrannize over us.
In the meantime, let us remain men till it shall please that
free voice to call us into saints. Grace is never placed but
in a reasonable creature; and is therefore said to be sent to
make reason see, what by nature only it cannot, never to
blemish it in what it can comprehend, as the learned bishop
hath observed against the Jesuit. Let us make much of all
the light that nature and reason will afford us, let us not
suffer one precious ray to be cast away upon us, but improve
it to the extent of its virtue, for the direction of our lives.
And whensoever this light shall fail, that it cannot guide us,
or our eyes dazzle that we cannot follow, let us pray to the
Father of lights, and God of spirits, that He will shine spiri-
tually in our hearts, and fulfil us with His light of grace
here, which may enable us to behold Him, and enjoy Him,
and rejoice with Him, and be satisfied with that eternal light
of His glory hereafter.
Now to Him which hath elected us, hath created, re-
deemed, &c.
Ppe2
Gal. vi. 12.
SERMON XXVIL.
Gat. vi. 15.
But a new creature.
Amoncst all other encumbrances, and delays in our way
to heaven, there is no one that doth so clog and trash, so
disadvantage and backward us, and in fine, so cast us be-
hind in our race, as a contentedness in a formal worship of
God, an acquiescence and resting satisfied in outward per-
formances, when men upon a confidence that they perform
all that can be required of a Christian, they look no further
than the outward work, observe not what heart is under this
outside, but resolve their estate is safe, they have as much
interest in heaven as any one. Such men as these the
Apostle begins to character and censure in the twelfth verse
of the chapter, “ As many as desire to make a fair shew in the
flesh,” &c. They that stand only on a fair specious outside,
and think all the sap and life of religion lies in the bark,
they do this and this; these will have you circumcised, and
constrain you to a many burthensome ceremonies ;-measur-
ing out religion to you by the weight, thus much is required
of you to do (as popish confessors set their deluded votaries:
their task of Ave Maries and Pater nosters by tale) and thus
you may be sure to be saved. In brief, the Apostle here
shews the unprofitableness of all these, and sets up the in-
ward sanctity and renewedness of heart against them all, as
the only thing that will stand us in stead, and appear to be
of any weight in the balance of the sanctuary. If you
observe all the commands, and submit yourselves to all the
burden of both law and gospel, and bear it upon your
shoulders never so valiantly; if you be content to be cir-
SERMON XXVII. 581
cumcised as Christ was, or because He hath now abrogated
that, make use of Christian liberty, and remain uncircum-
cised, notwithstanding all inducements to the contrary; in
brief, be you outwardly never so severe a Jew or Christian,
all that is nothing worth, there is but one thing most
peremptorily required of you, and that you have omitted ;
“or neither circumcision availeth any thing, neither uncir-
cumcision, but a new creature.”
The particle ‘but’ in the front of my text is exclusive and
restrictive, it excludes every thing in the world from pre-
tending to avail any thing, from being believed to do us any
good. For by circumcision the Church of the Jews, and by
uncircumcision the whole profession of Christian religion
beimg understood, when he saith neither of these availeth
any thing, he forcibly implies that all other means, all pro-
fessions, all observances that men think or hope to get
heaven by, are to no purpose, and that by consequence it
exactly restrains to the new creature; there it is to be had,
and nowhere else; thus doth he slight and undervalue, and
even reprobate all other ways to heaven, that he may set the
richer price, and raise a greater estimation in us of this.
The substance of all the Apostle’s discourse, and the ground-
work of mine shall be this one aphorism, nothing is effica-
ciously available to salvation, but a renewed, regenerated
heart. For the opening of which we will examine by way
of doctrine, wherein this new creature consists, and then by
way of use, the necessity of that, and unprofitableness of all
other plausible pretending means; and first of the first,
wherein this new creature consists.
It is observable, that our state of nature and sin is in
Scripture expressed ordinarily by old age, the natural-sinful Rom. vi.6;
man, that is, all our natural affections that are born and Sanaa
grow up with us, are called the old man, as if since Adam’s 22.
fall we were decrepit, and feeble, and aged as soon as born,
as a child begotten by a man in a consumption never comes
to the strength of a man, is always weak, and crazy, and
puling, hath all the imperfections and corporal infirmities
of age before he is out of his infancy. And according to
this ground the whole analogy of Scripture runs; all that is
opposite to the old decrepit state, to the dotage of nature, is
582 SERMON XXVII.
Marki.27; phrased new; “the new covenant ;” the language of believ-
a ers ; “new tongues ;” “anew commandment ;” “anew man.”
Ἢ Hag In sum, the state of grace is expressed by πάντα καινὰ, “allis
2Cor. vy. become new.” So that old and new, as it divides the Bible,
17. the whole state of things, the world; so it doth that to which
all these serve, man; every natural man which hath nothing
but nature in him, is an old man, be he never so young, is
full of years, even before he is able to tell them. Adam was
a perfect man when he was but a minute old, and all his
Eph. ii. 5. children are old even in the cradle, nay, even dead with old
age. And then consequently, every spiritual man which hath
somewhat else in him than he received from Adam, he that
John iii, 3. is “born from above,” γεννηθῇ ἄνωθεν, (for it may be so
rendered from the original, as well as born again, as our
English read it,) he that is by God’s Spirit quickened from
Eph. ii. 5. the old death, he is contrary to the former, a new man,
a new creature; the old eagle hath cast his beak and is
grown young; the man, when old, has “entered the second
time into his mother’s womb, and is born again,” all the
gray hairs and wrinkles fall off from him, as the scales
anh xi. from blind Tobit’s eyes, and he comes forth a refined, glori-
5: ous, beauteous new creature, you would wonder to see the
change. So that you find in general, that the Scripture
presumes it, that there is a renovation, a casting away of the
old coat, a youth and spring again in many men from the
old age and weak bed-rid estate of nature. Now that you
may conceive wherein it consists, how this new man is
brought forth in us, by whom it is conceived, and in what
womb it is carried, I will require no more of you, than to
observe and understand with me what is meant by the or-
dinary phrase in our divines, a new principle, or inward
principle of life, and that you shall do briefly thus. A
man’s body is naturally a sluggish, unactive, motionless,
heavy thing, not able to stir or move the least animal
motion, without a soul to enliven it; without that it is
but a carcass, as you see at death; when the soul is sepa-
rated from it, it returns to be but a stock or lump of flesh;
the soul bestows all life and motion on it, and enables it
to perform any work of nature. Again, the body and soul
together considered in relation to somewhat above their
SERMON XXVII. 583
power and activity, are as impotent and motionless, as
before the body without the soul. Set a man to remove a
mountain, and he will heave perhaps to obey your command,
but in event will do no more towards the displacing of it,
than a stone in the street could do; but now let an omni-
potent power be annexed to this man, let a supernatural
spirit be joined to this soul, and then will it be able to
overcome the proudest, stoutest difficulty in nature. You
have heard in the primitive Church of a grain of faith re-
moving mountains, and believe me, all miracles are not yet
out-dated. The work of regeneration, the bestowing of a
spiritual life on one “ dead in trespasses and sins,” the making
of a carcass walk, the natural old man to spring again, and
move spiritually, is as great a miracle as that. Now the
soul, in that it produces life and motion, the exercise of life
in the body, is called a principle, that is, a spring or fountain
of life, because all comes from it; in like manner, that which
moves this soul, and enables it to do that which naturally it
could not; that which gives it a new life, which before it
lived not, furnisheth it with spiritual powers to quell and
subdue all carnal affections which were before too hard for
it ; this, I say, is called properly an inward principle; and an
inward, because it is inwardly and secretly infused, doth not
only outwardly assist us as an auxiliary at a dead lift, but
is sown and planted in our hearts, as a soul to the soul, to
elevate and enable it above itself, hath its seat and palace in
the regenerate heart, and there exercises dominion, executes
judgment, and that is commonly either by prison or banish-
ment, it either fetters, or else expels all insolent rebellious
lusts. Now the new principle, by which not the man, but
the new man, the Christian, lives, is, in a word, the Spirit of
God, which unites itself to the regenerate heart, so that now
he is said to be a godly man, a spiritual man from the God,
from the Spirit, as before a living reasonable man from the
soul, from the reason that informed and ruled in him; which
is noted by that distinction in Scripture betwixt the regene-
rate and unregenerate, expressed by a natural or animal,
and a spiritual man. Those creatures that have no soul in
them are called naturals, having nothing but nature within
to move them; others which have a soul, animals, or living
Gal. 1'. 20.
584 SERMON ΧΧΥΤΙ.
creatures, by both which the unregenerate is signified in-
differently, because the soul which he hath stands him in
little stead, his flesh rules all, and then he is also called
a carnal man, for all his soul he is but a lump of flesh, and
therefore, whether you say he hath a soul, and so call him
an animal, or hath not a soul, and so call him a mere natu-
ral, there is no great difference in it. But now the rege-
nerate man which hath more than a soul, God’s Spirit to
enliven him, he is of another rank, πνευματικὸς, a spiritual
man, nay, only he properly a Christian, because he lives by
Christ, he lives, yet not he, but Christ liveth in him. This
being premised, that now you know what this new creature
is, he that lives and moves by a new principle, all that is
‘behind will be clearliest presented to you by resolving these
John iii. 3.
Jamak. 17.
John xv.
20.
1 Cor. vi.
19:
four questions; 1. whence it comes; 2. where it lodges; 3.
when it enters; 4. what works it performs there.
To the first, whence it comes, the answer is clear and punc-
tual, ἄνωθεν, from above, from whence comes every good, and
especially “every perfect gift,’ but this most peculiarly by a
several and more excellent way than any thing else. Since
Christ’s ascension the Holy Ghost of all the Persons in the
Trinity is most frequently employed in the work of descend-
ing from heaven, and that by way of mission from the Father
and the Son, according to the promise of Christ, ‘‘ The Com-
forter, whom I will send from the Father.” Now this Spirit
being present every where in its essence, is said to come to
us by communication of His gifts, and so to be peculiarly
resident in us, as God is in the Church, from which analogy
our bodies are called the “temples of the Holy Ghost which
is in us.” God sends then His Spirit into our hearts; and
this, I said, by a peculiar manner, not by way of emission,
as an arrow sent out of a bow, which loses its union which it
had with the bow, and is now fastened in the butt or white;
nor properly by way of infusion, as the soul is in the body,
infused from God, yet so also, that it is in a manner put into
our hands, and is so in the man’s possession that hath it, that
it is neither in any man’s else, nor yet by any extraordinary
tie annexed to God from whom it came; but by way of irra-
diation, as a beam sent from the sun, that is in the air in-
deed, and that substantially, yet so as it is not separated
SERMON XXVIT. 5S5
.
from the sun, nay, consists only in this, that it is united to
the sun; so that if it were possible for it to be cut off from
the sun, it would desist to be, it would illuminate no longer.
So that you must conceive these beams of God’s Spirit at the
same time in the Christian’s heart and in the Spirit, and so
uniting that Spirit to the heart, as you may conceive by this
proportion. I have a javelin or spear in my hand; if I would
mischief any thing, or drive it from me, I dart it out of my
hand at it, from which God’s judgments are compared to
shooting and lightning, “He hath bent His bow, He hath
sent forth His arrows, He cast forth lightnings.” But if I
like any thing that I meet with, if I would have it to me, I
reach out my spear and fasten in it, but still hold the spear
in my hand, and having pierced it draw it to me. Thus doth
God reach forth His graces to us, and as I may so say, by
keeping one end in His hand, and fastening the other in us,
plucks and unites us to Himself, from which regeneration is
ordinarily called an union with Christ, and this union by a
strong able band, διὰ μείζονος καὶ κυριωτέρου δέσμου, in
Eusebius’ phrase, which no man can cut asunder. It is im-
possible to divide or cut a spirit, and this bond is δέσμος
πνευματικὸς, a spiritual one, and that made St. Paul so con-
fident, that no creature should ever separate him. And
this God-does by way of emanation, as a loadstone sending
out its effluvia or magnetic atoms draws the iron to itself,
which never stays till it be united. Thus do you see from
whence this principle comes to me, and in what manner,
from God’s Spirit by this means uniting me to Himself.
To the second question, where it lodges, my answer is, in
the heart of man, in the whole soul; not in the understand-
ing, not in the will—a distinction of faculties invented by
philosophers to puzzle and perplex divines, and put them to
needless shifts—but, I say, m the whole soul, ruling and
guiding it in all its actions, enabling it to understand and
will spiritually ; conceived, I say, and born in the soul, but
nursed, and fed, and increased into a perfect stature by the
outward organs and actions of the body, for by them it be-
gins to express and shew itself in the world, by them the
habit is exerted and made perfect, the seed shot up into an
ear, the spring improved to autumn, when the tongue dis-
Ps. xvili.
14.
Rom. viii,
39.
Luke xi.
27.
Rom. i. 28.
586 SERMON XXVII.
courses, the hands act, the feet run the way of God’s com-
mandments. So, I say, the soul is the mother, and the ope-
rations of soul and body, the nurse of this spirit in us, and
then who can hold in his spirit without stiflmg, from break-
ing out into that joyful acclamation, “ Blessed is the womb
that bears this incarnate Spirit, and the paps that give Him
suck !” Now this inward principle, this grace of regenera-
tion, though it be seated in the whole soul, as it is an habit,
yet as it is an operative habit producing, or rather enabling
the man to produce several gracious works, so it is peculiarly
in every part, and accordingly receives divers names accord-
ing to several exercises of its power in those several parts. As
the soul of man sees in the eye, hears in the ear, understands
in the brain, chooses and desires in the heart, and being but
one soul, yet works in every room, every shop of the body in
a several trade, as it were, and is accordingly called a seeing,
a hearing, a willmg or understanding soul; thus doth the
habit of grace seated in the whole, express and eyidence itself
peculiarly in every act of it, and is called by as several names
as the reasonable soul hath distinct acts or objects. In the
understanding, it is, first, spiritual wisdom and discretion in
holy things, opposite to which is νοῦς ἀδόκιμος, an unapprov-
ing, as well as unapproved or reprobate mind, and frequently
in Scripture, spiritual blindness. Then as a branch of this,
it is belief or assent to the truth of the promises, and the
like; in the practical judgment it is spiritual prudence in
ordering all our holy knowledge to holy practice; im the will
it is aregular choice of whatsoever may prove available to sal-
vation, a holy love of the end, and embracing of the means
with courage and zeal. Lastly, in the outward man it is an
ordering of all our actions to a blessed conformity with a
sanctified soul. In brief, it is one principle within us doth
every thing that is holy, believes, repents, hopes, loves, obeys,
and what not? And consequently, is effectually in every part
of body and soul, sanctifying it to work spiritually, as an holy
instrument of a divine invisible cause, that is, the Holy Ghost
that is in us and throughout us.
For the third question, when this new principle enters;
first, you are to know that it comes into the heart in a three-
fold condition; 1. as an harbinger; 2. as a private secret
SERMON XXVII. 587
guest; 3. as an inhabitant or housekeeper. As it is an
harbinger, so it comes to fit and prepare us for itself; trims
up, and sweeps, and sweetens the soul, that it may be readier
to entertain Him when He comes to reside ; and that He doth
—as the ancient gladiators had their arma prelusoria—by
skirmishing with our corruptions before He comes to give
them a pitch battle; He brandishes a flaming sword about
our ears, and as by a flash of lightning, gives us a sense of a
dismal hideous state; and so somewhat restrains us from ex-
cess and fury ; first, by a momentary remorse, then by a more
lasting, yet not purifying flame, the spirit of bondage. In
sum, every check of conscience, every sigh for sin, every fear
of judgment, every desire of grace, every motion or inclina-
tion toward spiritual good, be it never so short-winded, is
preludium Spiritus, a kind of John Baptist to Christ, some-
thing that God sent before to prepare the ways of the Lord.
And thus the Spirit comes very often, in every affliction, every
disease—which is part of God’s discipline to keep us im some
order—in brief, at every sermon that works upon us at the
hearing; then I say, the lightning flashes in our eyes, we
have a glimpse of His Spirit, but cannot come to a full sight
of it; and thus He appears to many, whom He will never
dwell with. Unhappy men, that they cannot lay hold on Him
when [He comes so near them! and yet somewhat more happy
than they that never came within ken of Him; stopped their
ears when He spake to them even at this distance. Every
man in the Christian Church hath frequently in his life a
power to partake of God’s ordinary preparing graces; and it
is some degree of obedience, though no work of regeneration,
to make good use of them; and if he without the inhabitance
of the Spirit cannot make such use as he should, yet to make
the best he can; and thus, I say, the Spirit appears to the
unregenerate almost every day of our lives. 2. When this
Spirit comes a guest to lodge with us, then is He said to
enter; but till by actions and frequent obliging works He
makes Himself known to His neighbours, as long as He
keeps His chamber, till He declare Himself to be there, so
long He remains a private secret guest; and that is called the
introduction of the form, that makes a man to be truly rege-
nerate, when the seed is sown in his heart, when the habit is
Acts ix.
[ Actsil. 3. }
Luke i. 41.
Jer. i. 5.
158. xlix. 5.
5388 SERMON XXVII.
infused; and that is done sometimes discernibly, sometimes
not discernibly, but seldom, as when Saul was called in the
midst of his madness, he was certainly able to tell a man the
very minute of his change, of his being made a new creature.
Thus they which have long lived in an enormous antichris-
tian course, do many times find themselves stricken on a sud-
den, and are able to date their regeneration, and tell you
punctually how old they are in the Spirit. Yet because there
be many preparations to this Spirit; which are not this Spirit ;
mauy presumptions in our hearts false-grounded, many tremb-
lings and jealousies in those that have it, great affinity be-
tween faith natural and spiritual; seeing it is a spirit that
thus enters, and not as it did light on the disciples in a bodily
shape, it is not an easy matter for any one to define the time
of his conversion. Some may guess somewhat nearer than
others, as remembering a sensible change in themselves ; but
in a word, the surest discerning of it, is in its working, not
at its entering. I may know that now I have the. Spirit
better than at what time I came to it. Undiscernibly God’s
supernatural agency interposes sometimes in the mother’s
womb, as in John Baptist springing in Elizabeth at Mary’s
salutation, and perhaps in Jeremiah, “ Before thou camest
out of the womb I sanctified thee,’ and in Isaiah, “The
Lord that formed me from the womb to be His servant.”
But this divine address attends most ordinarily till the time
of our baptism, when the Spirit accompanying the outward
sign infuses itself into their hearts, and there seats and plants
itself,and grows up with the reasonable soul, keeping eventheir
most luxuriant years within bounds; and as they come to an
use of their reason, toa more and more multiplying this habit
of grace into holy spiritual acts of faith and obedience; from
which it is ordinarily said, that infants baptized have habitual
faith, as they may be also said to have habitual repentance,
and the habits of all other graces, because they have the root
and seed of those beauteous healthful flowers which will ac-
tually flourish then, when they come to years. And this, I
say, is so frequent to be performed at baptism, that ordina-
rily it is not wrought without that means, and in those
means we may expect it, as our Church doth in our Litur-
gies, where she presumes at every baptism that “it hath
SPRMON XXVII. 589
pleased God to regenerate the infant by His Holy Spirit.”
And this may prove a solemn piece of comfort to some who
suspect their state more than they need; and think it is im-
possible that they should be in a regenerate condition, be-
cause they have not as yet found any such notable change
in themselves, as they see and observe in others. These
men may as well be jealous they are not men, because they
cannot remember when their soul came to them; if they can
find the effects of spiritual life in themselves, let them call
it what they will, a religious education, or a custom of well-
doing, or an unacquaintedness with sin; let them comfort
themselves in their estate, and be thankful to God who
visited them thus betimes; let it never trouble them that
they were not once as bad as other men, but rather acknow-
ledge God’s mercy, who hath prevented such a change, and
by uniting them to Him in the cradle, hath educated, and
nursed them up in familiarity with the Spirit.
Lastly, the Spirit sometimes enters into our hearts upon
occasional emergencies, the sense of God’s judgments on our-
selves or others, the reflection on His mercies, the reading
good books, falling into virtuous acquaintance, but most emi-
nently at, and with the preaching of the Word; and this
by degrees as it seems to us; but indeed at some one especial
season or other, which yet perhaps we are not able to discern,
and here indeed are we ordinarily to expect this guest if we
have not yet found Him; here doth it love to be cherished, and
refreshed, and warmed within us, if we have it, “ for even it is
the power of God unto salvation.” The third condition in
which this Spirit comes into our hearts, is as an inhabitant
or housekeeper. ‘The Spirit,” saith Austin ὃ, “first is in us,
then dwells in us; before it dwells, it helps us to believe;
when it dwells, it helps, and perfects, and improves our faith,
and accomplishes it with all other concomitant graces.” So,
I say here, the Spirit is then said to inhabit, and keep house
in us, not as soon as it is entertained and received, but when
it breaks forth into acts, and declares itself before all men,
“when men see our good works, and glorify our Father.”
Before we were said to “live in the Spirit,” now to walk, as
you shall see the phrases used distinctly. To walk, that is,
4S. Aug. Epist. ον, ad Xystum. [epist. exciv. § 18, tom. ii. p. 720. ed. Ben. ]
Rom. i. 16.
Mat. v. 16.
Gal. v. 25.
Eph. v. 13.
Wisd. ii.
14.
Heb. xi. 6.
590 SERMON XXVII.
to go about conspicuously in the sight of all men, breaking
forth into works—as the sun after the dispersions of a mist or
cloud—whereby all men see and acknowledge his faith and
obedience, and find their own evil ways reprehended and
made manifest by his good, as is noted in the 13th verse,
“All things that are reproved, are made manifest by the
light.” Semblable to which is that of the atheists’ repining
at the godly man, “ He is made to reprove our thoughts.”
Thus is the third query resolved also, when this inward prin-
ciple enters. 1. It comes as an harbinger, in every outward
restraint by which God keeps us from sinning. 2. It enters
as a guest in some season or other, once for all. In the
womb, at baptism, at some sermon, sometimes at a notable
tempest, shaking and stirring us violently, ordinarily and for
the most part not to be discerned by us; and lastly, it comes
and dwells with us, and shews itself in its works, yet that not
at any set time after His entrance, not constantly without
ever covering His face, but when and as often as He pleases,
and the flesh resisteth not.
To the last query, what works it performs, the answer
shall be brief; every thing that may be called spiritual,
faith, repentance, charity, hope, self-denial, and the rest;
but these not promiscuously, or in a heap altogether, but
by a wise dispensation, in time and by degrees. The soul
being enabled by this inward principle, is equally disposed
to the producing of all these, and as occasions do occur,
doth actually perform and produce them; so that in my
conceit that question concerning the priority of repentance,
or faith, is not either of such moment, or difficulty, as is
by some disputers pretended. The seeds of them both are at
one time planted in the soul; and then there is no faith in
any subject, but there is repentance also; nor repentance
without faith. So that where it is said, “without faith it
is impossible to please God” in any thing else, it is true;
but argues no necessary precedence of it before other graces,
for the habits of them all are of the same age in us, and then
also will it be as true, that without repentance, or without
love, faith itself cannot please God; for if it be truly accept-
able faith, there is both repentance and love in the same
womb to keep it company. Thus are we wont to say that
only faith justifieth, but not faith alone; and the reason
SERMON XXVII. 591
these promises in Scripture are made sometimes to one grace
precisely, sometimes to another, is because they are all at
once rooted in the man, and in their habits chained toge-
ther inseparably. Faith saves every man that hath it, and yet
the believingest man under heaven shall not be saved without
charity. ‘Charity hides a multitude of sins,” and yet the ! Pet. iv. 8.
charitablest man in the world shall never have his score
crossed without repentance. A catalogue of these fruits of
the Spirit you may at your leisure make up to yourselves for
your trial out of the fifth to the Galatians from the twenty- Gal. v. 22.
second verse, and 1 Pet. i. 5. All these graces together, 1 Pet. i. δ.
though some belonging to one, some to another faculty of
the soul, are yet all at once conceived in it, at once begin
their life in the heart, though one be perhaps sooner ready
to walk abroad and shew itself in the world than another.
As in the second of Kings iv. 34, “ Elisha went up on the bed 2 Kingsiv.
and lay on the child, and put his mouth on his mouth, and oa
eyes upon his eyes, and hands upon his hands, and stretched
himself upon the child, and the flesh of the child waxed
warm,” and verse 35, “the child sneezed seven times, and ver. 35.
opened his eyes;” thus, I say, doth the Spirit apply itself
unto the soul, and measure itself out to every part of it; and
then the spiritual life comes at once into the soul—as motion
beginning in the centre diffuses itself equally through the
whole sphere, and affecteth every part of the circumference—
“and the flesh of the child waxed warm;’’ where the flesh
indefinitely signifieth every part of it together, and in the
spiritual sense the whole soul; and this is when the inward
principle, when the habit enters. Then for acts of life, one
perhaps shews itself before another, as the child first “sneezed
seven times,” a violent disburdening itself of some trouble-
some humours that tickle in the head; to which may be an-
swerable our spiritual clearing and purging ourselves by self-
denial, “the laying aside every weight,” then ‘“ opened his Heb, xii. 1.
eyes,” which in our spiritual creature, is spiritual illumina-
tion, or the eye of faith; these, I say, may first shew them-
selves as acts, and yet sometimes others before them, yet all
alike in the habit, all of one standing, one conception, one
plantation in the heart; though indeed ordinarily—like Esau
and Jacob—the rougher come out first. We begin our spiri-
Mat. xvi.
24,
[ Rom. vii.
23. |
Gal. ii. 20.
592 SERMON XXVII.
tual life in repentance and contrition, and with many harsh
twinges of the Spirit; and then comes faith, like Jacob at the
heels, smooth and soft, applying all the cordial promises to
our penitent souls. In brief, if any judgment be to be made,
which of these graces is first in the regenerate man, and
which rules in chief; I conceive self-denial and faith to be
there first, and most eminent, according to that notable
place where Christ seems to set down the order of graces
in true disciples; “Let him deny himself, and take up his
cross,” that is, forego all his carnal delights, and embrace all
manner of punishments and miseries, prepare himself even
to go and be crucified, and “then follow Me;” that is, by
a live faith believe in Christ, and prize Him before all the
world besides; and indeed in effect these two are but one,
though they appear to us in several shapes ; for faith is no-
thing without self-denial, it cannot work till our carnal affec-
tions be subjected to it. Believe a man may, and have flesh
and fleshly lust in him, but unless faith have the pre-emi-
nence, faith is no faith. The man may be divided betwixt
“the law of his members, and the law of his mind ;” so many
degrees of flesh, so many of spirit; but if there be constantly
but an even balance, or more of flesh than Spirit, if three de-
grees of Spirit and five of flesh, then can there not be said to
be any true self-denial, and consequently any faith, no more
than that can be said to be hot, which hath more degrees of cold
than heat in it. In brief, it is a good measure of self-denial
that sets his faith in his throne, and when by it faith hath con-
quered, though not without continual resistance, when it hath
once got the upper hand, then is the man said to be regene-
rate, whereupon it is that the regenerate state is called the
life of faith. Faith is become a principle of the greatest
power and activity in the soul. And so much for these four
queries ; from which I conceive every thing that is material,
and directly pertinent to instruct you, and open the estate of
a new creature, may be resolved. And for other niceties
how far we may prepare ourselves, how co-operate and join
issue with the Spirit, whether it work irresistibly by way of
physical influence, or moral persuasion, whether bemg once
had, it may totally or finally be lost again, and the like;
these, I say, if they are fit for any, 1 am resolved are not
SERMON XXVII. 593
necessary for a country auditory to be instructed in. It will
be more for your profit to have your hearts raised, than your
brains puffed up; to have your spirits and souls inwardly
affected to an earnest desire and longing after it, which will
perhaps be somewhat performed, if we proceed to shew you
the necessity of it, and unavailableness of all things else, and
that by way of use and application.
And for the necessity of renewedness of heart, to demon-
strate that, I will only crave of you to grant me, that the per-
formance of any one duty towards God is necessary, and then
it will prove itself; for it is certain no duty to God can be
performed without it. For it is not a fair outside, a slight
performance, a bare work done that is accepted by God; if
it were, Cain would deserve as much thanks for his sacrifice
as his brother Abel; for in the outside of them there was no
difference, unless perhaps on Cain’s side, that he was for-
wardest in the duty, and offered first. But it is the inside of Gen. iy. 3.
the action, the marrow and bowels of it that God judges by.
If a sum in gross, or a bag sealed up would pass for payment
in God’s audit, every man would come and make his ac-
counts duly enough with Him; and what he wanted in gold
for his payment should be made up in counters. But God
goes more exactly to work when He comes to call thee to an
account of thy stewardship; He is a God of thoughts, and [Ps. vii. 9.]
a searcher of the heart and reins, and it will then be a
harder business to be found just when He examines, or
clear when He will judge. The least spot and blemish [Ps. li. 4.]
in the face of it, the least maim or imperfection in the offer-
ing, the least negligence or coldness in the performance, nay,
the least corruption in the heart of him that doth it, hath
utterly spoiled the sacrifice. Be the bulk and skin of the
work never so large and beautiful to the eye, if it come not
from a sanctified, renewed, gracious heart, it will find no
acceptance but that in the prophet, “ Who hath required it [Isa. i. 2.]
at your hands?” This is not it that God is taken with, or
such as He commanded; it may pass for a compliment or a
work of course, but never be valued as a duty or real service.
Resolve thyself to dwell nowhere but in the Church, and
there—like Simeon στηλίτης, in Eusebius >—plant thyself
> [Evagrii Hist, Eccl., lib.i. c. 18. Ε΄. H. iii. p. 265.]
HAMMOND. Qaqg
Jam. i. 6.
94 SERMON XXVII.
continually in a pillar, with thy eyes, and words, fixed and
shot up perpetually towards heaven. If there be not a spirit
within thee to give light to the eyes, to add sighs and groans
to the voice, all this that thou hast done is nothing but as a
blind man’s pretensions to sight, and a dumb man’s claim to
speech ; and so im like manner in all our duties which the
world and carnal men set a price on. And the reason is, be-
cause every spiritual seeming work done by a natural man is
not truly so; it is nothing less than that which it is said to
be; his prayers are not prayers, lip-labour perhaps, but not
devotion; his serving of God is formality, not obedience ;
his hope of heaven, not a hope but a fancy. If God, or
Satan, a judge, or a tempter, should come to reason with
him about it, he would soon be worsted, never be able to
maintain his title to it.
In brief, the fairest part of a natural man, that which is least
counterfeit, his desire and good affections to spiritual thngs—
which we call favourably natural desires of spiritual obedi-
ence—these I say, are but false desires, false affections. 1. They
have no solidity or permanency in the will, only fluid and tran-
sitory, some slight sudden wishes, tempests and storms of a
troubled mind, soon blown over: the least temptation will be
sure to do it. They are like those wavering prayers without any
stay of faith, Jam. i. 6, “like a wave of the sea driven by the
wind and tossed.” 2. That being which they have is counter-
feit, they are not that which they are taken for. We are wont to
say that acts are distinguished by their objects; he sees truly
which judges the thing to be that that it is; it is true deed
that another man sees, he that takes blue for green, but he does
not see truly; so also he only willeth a good thing that wills that
in it which is truly good. Now the natural man, when he is
said to choose spiritual things, as heaven, happiness, and the
like, he desires not a spiritual, but a carnal thing; in desir-
ing heaven, he desires somewhat that would free him from
misery in happiness, a natural or moral good, that would be
acceptable to any creature under heaven: and so a Turk will
desire paradise, and that very impatiently, in hope that he
shall have his fill of lust there. Generally you may mark
that in such desires of spiritual things, it is some carnality
that moves unregenerate men: somewhat it is that may
SERMON XXVII. 595
please the flesh, and then it is not the spiritual but the car-
nal part of it that is their object, which they woo and make
love to; which you may judge of by this, that they are fre-
quent and importunate in their wishes for glory, seldom or
never for grace—though that also may be wished for carnally,
to make us more renowned and better esteemed in the world.
For the most part, I say, they desire glory, for that will make
them happy, and out of danger of worldly misfortunes ; re-
mission of sins, for these lie heavy on their consciences, and
give them many a twinge that they would fain be eased of ;
but seldom petition for grace, as if holiness without other
conveniences or gains, were not worth the having. And this
arises from hence, that our love of Christ grows by sending
out and fastening our affections on Him as an object fittest
for our turns, that will advantage us most; but not by re-
ceiving in His image and shape into our souls; this indeed
would make us not only love, but imitate Him, and having
once tasted, long after Him; this would sanctify our souls,
whereas the other doth but only satisfy our greedy affections.
By what hath been said it is plam enough—though it might
be much more amplified—that grace is of absolute necessity
to performance of any holy work acceptable to God: that
without it, whatsoever is done in spiritual matters is carnal,
not indeed spiritual, but equivocally and absurdly so called.
The natural man’s desires of heaven are not desires of
heaven: his faith, no faith: his believing of the Scripture,
infidelity ; because he doth not apply them particularly to
himself to obey them. In sum, when he prays, hopes, or
gives alms, he does somewhat indeed, and it is well done of
him; but he doth not truly either pray, or hope, or give
alms; there is some carnality in them that hath poisoned
them, and quite altered the complexion, the constitution,
and inward qualities of the work. And then indeed how
impatient should every Christian be of this cologuintida
within him? There is mors in olla, as the prophet once
spake, that is, death in the pot, that so infects and kills 2 Kings iv.
every thing that comes out of it. How should we abhor, a
and loathe, and detest this old leaven that so besours all
our actions; this heathenism of unregenerate carnal nature,
which makes our best works so unchristian? To insist longer
Qaq2
[ Gal. vi.
15.]
15. xXxvi.
6.
596 SERMON XXVII.
upon this, were but to increase your thirst, not to satisfy
it: to make you sensible of that marasmus and desperate
drought that hath gone over your souls, but not to help you
to any waters for the cure: that shall come next, as the last
work of this exercise to be performed, in a word.
Having learnt what this new creature is, and how ab-
solutely necessary to a Christian, O let us not defer one
minute longer to examine our estates, whether we are yet
renewed or no, and by the acts which we daily perform,
observe whether the sanctifying habit be as yet infused into
our souls. If the grounds of our best duties, that which
moves us in our holiest actions, be found upon search to be
but carnal; if a careful religious education, custom of the
place which we live in, fear of human laws, nay, perhaps a
good, soft, tender disposition, and the like, be the things that
make thee love God, and perform holy duties, and not any
inward principle of sanctity within thee: I counsel thee
to think better of thine estate, and consider whether the
like motives, had it so happened that thou hadst been born
and brought up in Turkey, might not have made thee wor-
ship Mahomet. I would be sorry to be rigid; 1 fear thou
wilt find they might: well then, a new course must be taken,
all thy former heathen, carnal, or at best, good moral life, all
thy formal performances, the best of thy natural desires must
be content to be ranked here with circumcision, and uncir-
cumcision availing nothing; there is no trust, or confidence
to be placed on these Egyptian staves “of reed.” And then, if
thou wilt not live heartless for ever, if ever thou meanest to
move or walk, or do any thing, you must to that Creator of
spirits and lover of souls, and never leave soliciting till He
hath breathed another breath into your nostrils, another soul
into your soul: you must lay yourself at His feet, and with
all the violence and rhetoric, and humility, that these wants
will prompt thee to, and woo, and importune the Holy Spirit
to overshadow thee, to conceive all holy graces spiritually in
thee: and if thou canst not suddenly receive a gracious an-
swer, that the Holy Ghost will come in unto thee, and lodge
with thee this night, yet learn so much patience from thy
beggarly estate, as not to challenge Him at thy own times,
but comfortably to wait His leisure. There is employment
SERMON XXVIL. 597
enough for thee in the while to prepare the room against
His coming, to make use of all His common graces, to cleanse
and reform thy foul corruptions, that when the Spirit comes
it may find thee swept and garnished. All the outward means
which God hath afforded thee, He commands thee to make
use of, and will require it at thy hands in the best measure,
even before thou art regenerate ; though thou sin in all thy
unregenerate performances, for want of inward sanctity, yet
it is better to have obeyed imperfectly than not at all: the
first is weakness, the other desperate presumption ; the first,
material, partial obedience, the second, total disobedience.
Yet whilst thou art preparing, give not over praying; they
are acts very compatible; thou mayest do them both toge-
ther. Whilst thou art a fortifying these little kingdoms
within thee, send these ambassadors abroad for help, that
thou mayest be capable of it when it comes. But above all
things be circumspect, watch and observe the Spirit, and be
perpetually ready to receive Its blasts; let It never have
breathed on thee in vain; let thine ear be for ever open to
Its whisperings: if It should pass by thee either not heard,
or not understood, it were a loss that all the treasures upon
earth could not repair, and for the most part you know It
comes not in the thunder. Christ seldom speaks so loud
now-a-days as he did to Saul. It is in a soft, still voice, and
I will not promise you that men that dwell in a mill, that are
perpetually engaged in worldly, loud employments, or that
men asleep shall ever come to hear of it. The sum of all
my exhortation is, after examination, to cleanse, and pray,
and watch; carefully to cleanse thyself, incessantly to pray,
and diligently to watch for the Sun of righteousness, when
He shall begin to dawn, and rise, and shine in thy heart by
grace. And do thou, O Holy Lord, work this whole work
in us, prepare us by Thy outward, perfect us by Thy inward
graces: awaken us out of the darkness of death, and plant a
new seed of holy light and life in us: infuse into our heathen
hearts a Christian habit of sanctity, that we may perform
all spiritual duties of holiness; that we may glorify Thee
here by Thy Spirit, and be glorified with Thee by Thy Christ
hereafter.
Now to Him that hath elected us, hath, &c.
Acts xix.
{1 Kings
mix, 12%]
Mat. ii. 16.
Wisd. ii. 1.
SERMON XXVIII.
2 Per. ii. ὃ.
Scoffers walking after their own lusts.
Tuat we may take our rise luckily, and set out with the
best advantage, that we may make our preface to clear our
passage to our future discourse, and so spend no part of our
precious time unprofitably, we will by way of imtroduction
examine what is here meant, 1, by scoffers, 2, by walking
after their own lusts. And first, scoffers here do not signify
those whom confidence joined to a good natural wit, hath
taught to give and play upon every man they meet with, which
in a moderate use is called εὐτραπελία, “ facetiousness,” in
an immoderate, scurrility*. But scoffers here are of a more
special stamp, those who deal out their scoffs only on God and
religion. The word in the original (ἐμπαίζειν) signifies to
mock, to abuse, and that either in words, and then it is ren-
dered “ scoffing;” or in our actions, when we promise any man
to perform a business, and then deceive his expectation, and
then it is rendered “deluding.” So when Herod saw he was
mocked, ὅτε ἐνεπαίχθη, that he was “ deluded” by the magi-
cians. So that in the first primitive sense, scoffers must
signify those who either laugh at God, or else delude Him
in not performing what He expects, and they by their pro-
fession promised. In the secondary notion, to scoff is by
way of argument to oppose any truth contumeliously or
bitterly, as Solomon begins his discourse of the atheists’
scoffs, “The ungodly said, reasoning with themselves ;” and
these are said to set their mouth against heaven, managing
disputes, which have both sting and poison in them; the
first to wound and overthrow the truth spoken of, the other
to infect the auditors with a contrary opinion. And these
a [ Aristot. Eth. Nic. iv. 8.]
SERMON XXVIII. 599
rational scoffs, for which Socrates anciently was very famous,
are ordinarily in form of question, as in the Psalmist often,
“Where is now their God?” 1. 6. certainly, if they had a God, [Ps. xlii,
He would be seen at time of need, He would now shew Him- oe 10;
self in their distress. In which they do not only laugh at the ¢xv- 2.)
Israclites for being such fools as to worship Him that will not
relieve them, but implicitly argue, that indeed there is no
such God as they pretend to worship. And just in this man-
ner were the scoffers in my text, who did not only laugh, but
argue, saying, “ Where is the promise of His coming?’ per- ver. 4.
suading themselves, and labouring to prove to others, that what
is spoken of Christ’s second coming to judgment was but a
mere dream, a μορμολύκειον, a bugbear, or fable to keep men
in awe, and therefore laugh at it, as the Athenians did at the
resurrection, Acts xvii. 3; ‘ and when they heard of the resur- [Acts xvii.
rection of the dead, some mocked,” &c., i.e. disputed sarcasti- 52
cally ἃ Πα contumeliously against it, that certainly there was no
such matter. And thus also is the same word used of those
which jomed their reason and malice to disprove Christ’s
omnipotence, where they reviled and mocked Him, saying,
He saved others, Himself He cannot save.” In which [Matt.
speech the bitterest part of the scoff was the reason there ον 52]
used, plausible enough amongst ignorant Jews, that surely
if He had any power, He would make use of it for Himself.
Thirdly, to scoff is sometimes without words or actions to
shew a contempt or neglect of any body. So Herod’s mock-
ing of Christ is set as an expression that He did not think
Him worthy talking with, “He set Him at nought, and [Luke
mocked Him, and sent Him back to Pilate ;? He would not ™* 1.1
vouchsafe to take notice of Him, nor to be troubled with the
examination of so poor, contemptible a fellow, And so in
Aristotle», not to know a man’s name, not to have taken so
much notice of him, as to remember what to call him, is
reckoned the greatest neglect, the unkindest scoff in the
world, and is ordinarily taken very tenderly by any one who
hath deserved any thing at our hands. So that in brief—to
gather up what we have hitherto scattered—the scoffers here
meant, are those, who promising themselves to God’s service,
do delude Him when He looks to find them amongst His
» [ Aristot. Rhet., lib. ii. ο. 2. § 26.]
Ps. x. 4.
Mat. xxiv.
600 SERMON XXVIII.
servants, i. 6. remain errand ° atheists under a Christian pro-
fession, who by letting loose either their wits to profane
jests, or their reason to heathenish conceits and disputings,
or their actions to all manner of disobedience, demonstrate
that indeed they care not for God, they scarce remember His
name, neither is He in all their thoughts.
In the next place, walking after their own lusts, is giving
themselves liberty to follow all the directions of corrupt pol-
luted nature, in entertaining all conceits and practices which
the pride of their understandings and rankness of their affec-
tions shall propose to them in opposition to God. And this
without any reluctancy or twinge of conscience, walking on
as securely and confidently as if it were indeed the night
highway.
So that now you have seen the outside of the text, and
looked it over in the gross, it is time to survey it more par-
ticularly in its parts, and those are two: 1. The sin of
atheism, and the subjects in which it shews itself, “There
shall come in the last days scoffers.” 2. The motive and
impellent to this sin, a liberty which men give themselves,
to walk after their own lusts.
And first of atheism, and the subjects in whom it shews itself,
“Tn the,” &c. Where you may note that the words being in a
form of a prophecy, do note a sort of people which were to
come, in respect of St. Peter who writes it; and though in its
first aspect it refer to the period of the Jewish nation, and de-
struction of Jerusalem, takes in the parallel state of things
under the last age, and dotage, and declination of the world.
Accordingly we see at the 24th of St. Matthew, the prophecy
of both, as it were interwoven and twisted into each other; so
that what St. Peter saith shall be, we may justly suspect is
fulfilled amongst us, his future being now turned into a pre-
sent, his prophecy into a story. In the Apostles’ times, when
Christianity was in the cradle, and wanted years and strength
to move and shew itself in the world, there were but very
few that would acknowledge it; many sects of philosophers,
who peremptorily resolved themselves against this profession,
joined issue with the Apostles in assiduous disputation, as
we may find in the 17th of the Acts. Amongst those the
© | Errand or errant, an early way of spelling arrant. ]
SERMON XXVIII. 601
Epicureans did plainly deny that there was any God that
governed the world, and laugh at any proof that Moses and
the prophets could afford for their conviction. And here a
man might think that his prophecy was fulfilled in his own
days, and that he needed not to look beyond that present
age for store of scoffers. Yet so it is, that the infidelity which
he foresaw should in those last ages reign confidently in the
world, was represented to him in a larger size and uglier
shape than that of the present philosophers. The Epicurean
unbelief seemed nothing to him, being compared to this
Christian atheism, where men under the vizard of religion
and profession of piety, are in heart arrant heathens, and in
their fairest carriages do indeed but scoff, and delude, and
abuse the very God they worship. Whence the note is, that
the profession of Christianity is mixed with an infinite deal
of atheism, and that, in some degree, above the heathenism of
the perversest philosophers. There were in St. Peter’s time
Epicureans, and all sects of scoffers at Christianity, and yet
the scoffers indeed, the highest degree of atheism, was but yet
heaving; it would not rise and shew itself till the last days.
It is worth observing what variety of stratagems the
- devil hath always had to keep us in defiance with God, and
to nourish in us that hostility and enmity against heaven,
which is so deep and predominant im himself. He first set
them a work to rebel and fortify themselves against God, and
make themselves, by building of a tower, so impregnable that
God Himself could not be able to disperse them. Afterwards, Gen. xi.
when by the punishment and defeating of that design, the
world was sufficiently instructed that no arm of flesh, no
bodily strength could make resistance against heaven; when
the body could hold out in rebellion no longer, he then in-
structs the inward man, the soul, to make its approaches, and
challenge heaven. Now the soul of man consisting of two
faculties, the understanding and the will, he first deals with
the understanding, and sets that up against God in many
monstrous fashions; first, in deluding it to all manner of
idolatrous worship, in making it adore the sun, the moon, and
the whole host of heaven, which was a more generous kind
of idolatry. Afterwards, in making them worship dogs and
cats, onions and garlic, for so did the Egyptians; and this
Gen. iii. 15.
602 SERMON XXVIII.
was a more sottish stupid affection ; a man would wonder how
the devil could make them such fools. Afterward he wrought
still upon their understanding, in making them—under pre-
tence of two laudable qualities, admiration and gratitude, ad-
miration of any kind of virtue, and gratitude for any good turn
—to deify and worship as gods any men which had ever done,
either their nation, or private persons, any important good or
favour. So that every heros, or noble, famous man, as soon
as he was dead, was worshipped. It were long to shew you
the variety of shifts in this kind, which the devil used to
bring in the πολυθεότης of the Gentiles, i.e. their worship-
ping of many gods. In brief, this plot lasted thus till Chris-
tianity came into the world, and turned it out of doors, and
at Christ’s resurrection all the gods of the heathen expired.
However, the devil still stuck close to that faculty of the
soul which he had been so long acquainted with, I mean the
understanding, and seeing through the whole world almost
the doctrine of Christ had so possessed men, that he could
not hope to bring in his heathen gods again, he therefore
hath one design more on the understanding; seeing it is
resolved to believe Christ in spite of heathenism, he then
puzzles it with many doubts about this very Christ it is so
possessed with. He raises up, in the first ages of the Church,
variety of heresies concerning the union of His natures,
equality of His person with the Father, and the like: and
rung as many changes in men’s opinions as the matter of
faith was capable of. There was no truth almost in Chris-
tianity, but had its heretic to contradict and damn it. Now
since at last, reason and truth, and the power of Scripture
having outlived in a good degree fundamental error in
opinion, hath almost expulsed the devil out of the head—or
upper part of the soul, the understanding—his last plot is on
the heel, i.e. the will and affections; and that he hath bruised
terribly, according to that prophecy, Gen. iti. 15. He deals
mainly on our manners, and strives to make them, if it
be possible, sinful beyond capability of mercy. And this
design hath thrived with him wonderfully; he hath wrought
more opposition against God, more heresy against Christ in
our lives than ever he was able to do in our doctrine. In
a kingdom, where the custom of the country and education
SERMON XXVIII. 603
hath planted purity of faith in the understanding, he there
labours to supplant and eradicate charity and devotion in the
will, and crucifies Christ more confidently in our corrupt
heathenish practices than ever the Jews did in their incre-
dulity. And on this plot he hath stuck close, and insisted
a long while, it being the last and most dangerous stratagem
that the policy of hell can furnish him with, to corrupt, and
curse, and make abominable a sincere belief by an atheistical
conversation. And this doth prove in general, that it is the
devil’s aim, and from thence probably the Christian’s curse, to
have more hostility against God in our wills, and so to be
more horrible atheists, than ever the heathen had in their
understandings. Now that we may the more distinctly
discover the Christian atheist, who is very orthodox in his
opinion, very heretical in his practice; we will observe how
every part of his life, every piece of his conversation doth
directly contradict his doctrine, and pluck down and deface
the very fabric of godliness, expunge those very notions of
piety, which reason and Scripture hath erected in the soul.
And first,
He is in his knowledge sufficiently catechised in the know-
ledge of Scripture, and is confident that all its dictates are
to be believed, and commands practised. But if you look to
find this assent confirmed by his practice, and expressed in his
carriage, you are much mistaken in the business. Is he such
a fool as to order his life according to the rigour of them?
No, no doubt, it is not one man’s work to believe the Scrip-
ture and obey it. Suppose I should tell you that there are
but a few of you that read Scripture to that purpose, that
observe any edict of piety or virtue only because the Scrip.
ture hath commanded it, There be many restraints that
keep unregenerate men from sinning; a good disposition, re-
ligious education, common custom of the place or times where
we live, human laws, and the like; and each or all of these
may curb our forwardness, and keep us in some order. But
who is there amongst us, that being tempted with a fair,
lovely, amiable vice, which he may commit without any re-
gret of his good nature, scandal to his former carriages, fear
or danger of punishment, either future or present, or any
other inconvenience: who is there, I say, that from the
1 ἐπιπολῆς.
Mark v.
17.
604 SERMON XXVIIL.
mere awe and respect that he bears to Scripture, retires and
calls himself off from that sin which he had otherwise fallen
into? If I should see all manner of conveniences to sin in
one scale, and the bare authority of the Scriptures in the
other quite outweighing all them with its heaviness, I should
then hope that our hearts were catechised, as well as our
brains, in the acknowledgment of this truth, that Scripture
is to be believed and obeyed. But I much fear me, if I
should make an enquiry in every one of our hearts here
single, the greatest part of the jury would bring in an eyi-
dence of guilt, that in any our most entire obediences some
other respect casts the scales; and this is one piece of di-
rect atheism, that though our understandings affirm, yet our
will and affections deny that Scripture is for its own sake
to be obeyed.
Secondly, our brains are well enough advised in the truth
of the doctrine of God’s essence and attributes, our under-
standings have a distinct conceit of awe and reverence, to an-
swer every notion we have of God; and yet here also our con-
versation hath its postures of defiance, its scoffs and arts of
reviling, as it were, to deface and scrape out every of these
notions out of our wills, and to persuade both ourselves and
others, that that knowledge doth only float’ in our brains,
but hath no manner of weight to sink it deep into our hearts.
To glance at one or two of these; we believe, or at least pre-
tend we do so, the immensity} i.e. the ubiquity and omni-
presence of God, that He indeed is every where, to fill, to
see, to survey, to punish; and yet our lives do plainly proclaim,
that in earnest we mean no such matter; we shut up our
hearts against God, and either as the Gadarenes did Christ,
being weary of His presence, fairly entreat, or else directly
banish Him out of our coasts, because He hath been or is
like to be the destruction of some swine, 1. 6. bestial affec-
tions in us. And in sum, those bodies of ours, which He
hath marked out for His temples, we will scarce allow Him
for His inn to lodge with us one night. Again, can we ex-
pect to be credited when we say we believe the ubiquity
aud omnipresence of God, and yet live and sin as con-
fidently as if we were out of His sight or reach? Do we
behave ourselves in our outrages, in our luxury, nay, even
SERMON XXVIII. 605
in our gravest devotions, as if God were within ken?
Without all doubt, in every minute almost of our lives we
demonstrate that we doubt either of His omnipresence to
see, or else His justice to punish us: for those very things
which we dare not to venture on in the sight of an earthly
magistrate that may punish us, nay, of a spy that may com-
plain of us, nay, of an enemy that will upbraid us, nay, of a
friend that will check and admonish us; we never doubt, or
demur, or delay to practise in private, or the dark, where
still God is present to oversee and punish. And if this be
not a scoffing, a deluding, a mere contemning of God, to do
that without any fear or regret in His sight, which we never
offer to attempt before a man, nay, a friend, I know not
what may be counted atheism. In like manner, we ac-
knowledge God to be αὐτάρκης, “all-sufficient ;” and if we
should be examined in earnest, we would confess that there
is no ability in any creature to bestow or provide any good
thing for us; and yet our will here also hath its ways and
arguments of contradiction. Our whole life is one continued
confutation of this piece of our faith; our tremblings, our
jealousies, our distrusts, our carefulness, our worldly provi-
dence and importunate carking, our methods and _strata-
gems of thrift and covetousness, and the whole business of
our lives in wooing, and soliciting, and importuning every
power of nature, every trade and art of the world, to succour,
to assist, and provide for us, are most egregious evidences
that we put no trust or confidence in God’s all-sufficiency,
but wholly depend and rely upon the arm of flesh, both to
raise and sustain us. This very one fashion of ours, in all our
distresses, to fly to and call upon all manner of second causes,
without any raising or elevating our eyes or thoughts toward
God, from whom cometh our help, plainly shews that God [2 Sam.
still dwells abroad in tents: we have seen or heard of Him, τ ®!
but have not yet brought Him home into our hearts, there
to possess, and rectify, and instruct our wills, as well as our
understandings.
Thirdly, the whole mystery of Christ articulately set down
in our Creed we as punctually believe, and to make good our
names, that we are Christians in earnest, we will challenge
and defy the fire and fagot to persuade us out of it; and
Lev. xix. 7.
606 SERMON XXVIII.
these are good resolutions, if our practices did not give our
faith the lie, and utterly renounce at the church door what-
soever we professed in our pews. This very one thing, that He
which is our Saviour, shall be our Judge, that He which was
“crucified, dead, and buried, sits now at the right hand of
God, and from thence shall come to judge the world ;” this
main part, yea, sum of our belief, we deny and bandy
against all our lives long. If the story of Christ coming to
judgment, set down in the 25th of Matthew after the 30th
verse, had ever entered through the doors of our ears to the
inward closets of our hearts, it is impossible but we should
observe and practise that one single duty there required of
us. Christ there as a Judge exacts and calls us to account
for nothing in the world, but only works of mercy, and
according to the satisfaction which we are able to give Him
in that one point, He either entertains or repels us; and
therefore our care and negligence in this one business, will
prove us either Christians or infidels. But alas! it is too
plain, that in our actions we never dream either of the judg-
ment or the arraignment; our stupid neglect of this one
duty argues us not only unchristian but unnatural. Besides
our alms-deeds, which concern only the outside of our neigh-
bour, and are but a kind of worldly mercy, there are many
more important, but cheaper works of mercy, as good counsel,
spiritual instructions, holy education of them that are come
out of our loins, or are committed to our care, seasonable
reproof, according to that excellent place, “Thou shalt not
hate thy brother in thine heart, but in any wise reprove
him :” a care of carrying ourselves that we may not scandal,
or injure, or offer violence to the soul and tender conscience
of him that is flexible to follow us into any riot. These and
many other works of mercy in the highest degree, as con-
cerning the welfare of other men’s souls, and the chief thing
required of us at the day of judgment, are yet so outdated
in our thoughts, so utterly defaced, and blotted out in the
whole course of our lives, that it seems we never expect that
Christ in His majesty as a Judge, whom we apprehend, and
embrace, and hug in His humility as a Saviour. Beloved,
till by some severe hand held over our lives, and particu-
larly by the daily study and exercise of some work of mercy
SERMON XXVIIT. 607
or other, we demonstrate the sincerity of our belief; the
saints on earth and angels in heaven will shrewdly suspect,
that we do only say over that part of our Creed, that we
believe only that which is for our turn, the sufferings and
satisfactions of Christ, which cost us nothing, but do not pro-
ceed to His office of a Judge, do not either fear His judg-
ments, or desire to make ourselves capable of His mercies.
Briefly, whosoever neglects or takes no notice of this duty
of exercising works of mercy, whatsoever he brags of in his
theory or speculation, in his heart either denies or contemns
Christ as Judge, and so destroys the sum of his faith; and
this is another kind of secret atheism.
Fourthly, our Creed leads us on to a belief and acknowledg-
ment of the Holy Ghost; and it is well we have all conned
His name there, for otherwise I should much fear that it
would be said of many nominal Christians, what is reported
of the Ephesian disciples, “They have not so much as heard Acts xix.
whether there be an Holy Ghost or no.” But not to suspect 2
so much ignorance in any Christian, we will suppose in-
deed men to know whatsoever they profess, and enquire only
whether our lives second our professions, or whether indeed
they are mere infidels and atheistical, in this business con-
cerning the Holy Ghost. How many of the ignorant sort
which have learnt this name in their Catechism or Creed,
have not yet any further use to put it to, but only to make
up the number of the Trimity, have no special office to ap-
point for Him, no special mercy, or gift, or ability to beg of
Him in the business of their salvation, but mention Him only
for fashion’s sake, not that they ever think of preparing their
bodies or souls to be temples worthy to entertain Him, not
that they ever look after “the earnest of the Spirit”’ in their 2 Cor. i.
hearts! Further yet, how many better learned amongst us
do not yet im our lives acknowledge Him in that epithet
annexed to His title, the Holy Ghost, i. 6. not only eminently
in Himself holy, but causally, producing the same quality in
us, from thence called the sanctifying and renewing Spirit!
how do we for the most part fly from, and abandon, and
resist, and so violently deny Him, when He once appears to
us in this attribute! When He comes to sanctify us, we are
not patient of so much sourness, so much humility, so much
608 SERMON XXVIII.
non-conformity with the world, as He begins to exact of us;
we shake off many blessed motions of the Spirit, and keep
ourselves within garrison, as far as we can out of His reach,
lest at any turn He should meet with, and we should be
converted. Lastly, the most ordinary morally qualified, tame
Christians amongst us, who are not so violent as to profess
open arms against this Spirit, how do they yet reject Him out
of all their thoughts! How seldom do mary peaceable orderly
men amongst us, ever observe their wants, or importune the
assistance of this Spirit! In sum, it was a shrewd speech of
the fathers‘, which will cast many fair outsides at the bar
for atheists, “ that the life of an unregenerate man is but the
life of an heathen,” and that it is our regeneration only that
raises us up ἐξ ἐθνῶν, from being still mere Gentiles. He
that believes in his Creed the Person, nay, understands in
the schools the attributes and gifts of the Holy Ghost, and
yet sees them only in the fountain, neither finds nor seeks
for any effects of them in his own soul; he that is still unre-
generate, and continues still gaping and yawning, stupid and
senseless in this his condition is still, for all his Creed and
learning, in effect an atheist. And the Lord of heaven give
him to see, and endeavours to work, and a heart to pray, and
His Spirit to draw and force him out of this condition.
Fifthly, not to cramp in every article of our Creed into this
discourse, we will only insist on two more. We say therefore
that we believe “the Forgiveness of Sins,” and it is a blessed
confidence, that all the treasures in the world cannot equal.
But do ourselves keep equipage, and hand in hand accom-
pany this profession? Let me catechise you a while. You
believe the forgiveness of sins, but I hope not absolutely,
that the sufferings of Christ shall effectually clear every
man’s score at the day of judgment: well then, it must
be meant only of those that by repentance and faith are
grafted into Christ, and shall appear at that great marriage
in a wedding-garment, which shall be acknowledged the
livery and colours of the Lamb. But do our lives ever stand
to this explication and restriction of the article? Do they
ever expect this beloved remission by performing the condi-
4 Clemens Alcx. Sirom., p. 281. [ut supr.]
SERMON XXVIII. 609
tion of repentance ? Do we ever go about to make ourselves
capable of receiving this mercy conditionally offered us? Nay,
do we not by our wilful stupidity, and pertinacious con-
tinuing in sin, nullify in respect of us all that satisfaction
of Christ, and utterly abandon those means which must
bring home this remission to us? The truth is, our faith runs
only on general terms, we are willing to lay all our sins on
Christ’s shoulders, and persuade ourselves somewhat slightly
and coldly, that He will bear them in the root and in the
fruit, in the bullion and in the coin, in the gross and in the
retail, 1. 6. both our original and our actual transgressions :
but we never take any course to rest satisfied that we in
particular shall participate of this happiness. This requires
the humiliation of the whole man, the spirit of bondage for
a while, afterwards a second purity and virginity of the soul
recovered by repentance, and then a soberly grounded faith
and confidence, and an expressing of it by our own forgiving
of others. And till this piece of our Creed be thus explained
and interpreted in our conversation, we remain but confident
atheists, not able to persuade any body that hears us that
indeed we believe what we profess.
Sixthly and lastly, “the Resurrection of the Body,” and its
consequent, “ Everlasting Life,” is the close of our faith, and
end, and prop, and encouragement, and consummation of
our hope; and yet we take most pains of all to prove our-
selves infidels in this; our whole carriage, both in the choice
and observance of our religion, shew that we do not depend
on it, that we put no confidence in the resurrection. If we
went on this assurance, we should contemn any worldly en-
couragement, and make the same thing both the object and
end of our service. We should scorn to take notice of so
poor a thing as profit or convenience is, in a matter of so
high importance, knowing and expecting that our reward
shall be great in heaven. This one thought of a resurrec-
tion, and an infinite reward of any faithful undertaking of
ours, would make us disdain, and almost be afraid of any
temporal recompense for our worship of God, for fear it
should, by paying us beforehand, deprive us of that everlast-
ing one. We should catch and be ambitious of that ex-
pression of devotion, which were most painful and least pro-
HAMMOND. ΤΥ
Hos. x. 11.
[ Deut.
xxv. 4. ]
77
610 SERMON XXVIII.
fitable as to worldly advantage: and yet we in the stupidity
of atheistical hearts are so improvidently covetous, so hasty
and impatient in our religion, that unless some present gain
allure and draw us, we have no manner of life, or spirit, or
alacrity to this, as we count it, unprofitable service of God.
The least encumbrance in the world will fright us from the
greatest forwardness, and nimbleness, and activity in re-
ligion: and the least appearance of promotion, or other like
encouragement, will produce and raise in us these affections
and expressions of zeal, which the expectation of the resur-
rection could never work in us. Our religion is somewhat
like that of the Samaritans, before Christ’s time, either Jews
or heathens, according as their king Antiochus would have
them*; after Christ’s time were perpetually either Jews or
Christians, according as the Romans, their new lords and
masters, either threatened or granted privilege to the Jews.
If there were any thing to be gotten by the profession, they
would be as solemn Christians as any. So when the Goths
and Vandals overrun Italy, and—whether upon good affec-
tion or compulsion from God, I know not—spared them that
fled to the basilica in Rome‘, the place where the Christians
exercised; then, 1 say, they which formerly persecuted the
Christians, now bore them company very friendly to their
churches, and to save their lives fled to the temple for a
refuge, which before they abomined; and made use of
Christianity for their safeguard, which they would not own
for their religion, and hurried to that sanctuary for their
lives, which they would not visit for their souls. The condi-
tion of our religion is like that which is upbraided to Ephraim,
“ Ephraim is like an heifer that loveth to tread out the corn.”
It was prohibited by the law to muzzle the ox or heifer that
treadeth out the corn; it was allowed them to feed as long
as they did the work, and that made Ephraim love the toil
so well, because that at the very time he performed the labour,
he enjoyed the fruit of it; had, as we say, his wages in his
hand; had some present emolument that would ingratiate
his work to him; was not left to such a tedious expectation,
€ Josephus, Antiq. Jud., lib. xii. c. ‘ (Cf. S. August. De Civit. Dei, lib.
5. [vol. i. p. 538. ed. Huds.] et lib. xi. i.e. 1. Op., tom. vii. init. ]
c. 8. [§ 6. p. 504. ]
SERMON XXVIII. 611
to so long a date as to wait for his reward till the resurrec-
tion: those were too hard terms for him, he could not endure
to be tied so long up to the empty rack, or feed upon the
bit. And thus hasty are we in the exacting of our reward
for our service of God: we will never set our hands to it,
unless we may make our conditions: we are resolved not to
be such fools, as to serve God for nought, to spend the
quickest of our spirits in a sour crabbed ‘profession, and
expect our thanks at doomsday, This plainly demonstrates,
that however our theory be possessed, our practice places no
trust, no confidence, no assurance in that part of our Creed,
the resurrection. Again, it was an excellent argument to
persuade doubtful Christians in the youth and nonage of
the Church, of the certainty of the resurrection, that religious
men, and those whom undoubtedly God loved, were full of
sufferings in this world, and lived and died many of them
without any expression of God’s favour to them, which made
them certaimly to conclude, that no doubt God hath some
other course to exhibit Himself in the riches of His mercy to
them; and seeing there was no hope but in another world,
‘Verily there should be a reward for the righteous, doubtless ees viii.
there is a God that judgeth the earth ;” and by this argument τι
we may try ourselves for the sincerity of our faith in this
business. If we can be patient to endure afflictions here,
and not complain or grumble for a respite and deliverance,
but keep all our hopes to be accomplished, defer all our
happiness to be performed to us at the resurrection, and
though God kill us, yet trust im Him, and be able to see [Job xiii.
through death, in a trust “that our Redeemer lives, and that }* 1
Job xix.
with these eyes we shall behold Him,” then may we cheer up, 25.
and persuade ourselves on good grounds that our hearts
and lives do assent to the resurrection, which our tongues
brag of: ‘Take no heaviness to heart, but drive it away and Ecclus.
remember the end.” But if this consideration cannot digest 3**¥"*
the least oppression of this life, cannot give us patience for
the lightest encumbrance, but for all our Creed we still fly
out into all outrages of passion and ecstacies of impatience,
we plainly betray ourselves men of this present world, whose
happiness or misery is only that which is temporary, and
before our eyes, are not able by the perspective of faith to
Rr2
{1 Thess.
iv. 13.]
[ Ps. xlix.
20.
{ Luke xvi.
9.]
612 SERMON XXVIII.
behold that which easily ‘we might, all our wants relieved,
all our injuries revenged, all our wounds bound up in the
day of the resurrection: but all our life long we repine and
grumble, and are discontented as men without hope; and
whilst we do thus, what do we but act the part of these
atheists here in my text, scoffing and saying, “‘ Where is the
promise of His coming,” in the next verse to my text. This
very impatience and want of skill in bearing the brunts of
this our warfare, is but a piece of cowardly atheism, either a
denying or mocking at the resurrection. Every sigh is a
scoff, every groan a gibe, every fear a sly art of laughing at
the stupidity of those who depend upon the fulfilling of the
promise of His coming. Lastly, say we what we will, we
live as if there were no resurrection, as Sadducees, if not as
atheists; all our designs look no further than this life, all
our contrivances are defeated and frustrate in the grave; we
manage ourselves with so little understanding, that any
spectator would judge by our actions that it is no injury to
compare us to the beasts that perish and never return again.
Certainly if we had any design upon heaven or another life,
we would here make some provision for it, “ make ourselves
friends of our unrighteous mammon, that when we fail, they
may receive us into everlasting habitations,” i.e. use those
good things that God hath given us with some kind of pro-
vidence, that they may stand us in stead when we have need
of them, 1. 6. not only as instruments to sin—for that is to
get us more enemies—but as harbingers to be sent before us
to heaven. It was a bitter sarcasm of the fool to the abbot
on his death-bed, that the abbot deserved his staff, as bemg
the verier fool of the two, that being straight to die, to
remove his tent to another world, he had sent none of his
household-stuff before him. The truth is, we live generally
as men that would be very angry, much displeased if any
should persuade us there were a resurrection, the very
mentioning of it to us might seem to upbraid our ordinary
practices, which have nothing but the darkness of death
and silence of the grave to countenance them. I may justly
say that many ignorant heathens, which were confident
there was nothing beyond this life, expected certainly with
death to be annihilated, and turn again into a perpetual
SERMON XXVIII. 613
nothing; yet either for the awe they bore to virtue, or fear
of disgrace after death, kept themselves more regularly,
lived more carefully than many of us Christians. And this
is an horrid accusation, that will lie very heavy upon us,
that against so many illuminated understandings the igno-
rance of the Gentiles should rise up in judgment, and the
learned Christian be found the most desperate atheist. I
have been too large upon so rigid a doctrine as this, and
I love and pray God I may always have occasion to come
up to this place upon a more merciful subject: but I told
you even now out of Lev. xix. 17, that it was no small work
of mercy, it was the most friendly office that could be per-
formed any man, to reprehend, and as the text saith, “not to
suffer sin upon thy neighbour,” especially so sly a covert lurk-
ing sin as this of atheism, which few can discern in them-
selves. I shall now come to application, which because the
whole doctrine spoke morally to your affections, and so in a
manner prevented uses, shall be only a recapitulation and
brief knitting up of what hitherto hath been scattered at
large.
Seeing that the devil’s policy of deluding, and bewitching,
and distorting our understandings, either with variety of
false gods, or heresies raised upon the true, is now almost
clearly out-dated, and his skill is all bent to the deforming
of the will, and defacing the character of God, and the ex-
pression of the sincerity of our faith in our lives; we must
deal with this enemy at his own weapon, learn to order our
munition according to the assault, and fortify that part most
impregnably, toward which the tempest binds and threatens.
There is not now so much danger to be feared from the in-
road of heretics in opinion as in practice, not so much
atheism to be dreaded from the infidelity of our brains, as
the heathenism and gentilism of our lusts, which even in
the midst of a Christian profession deny God even to His
. face. And therefore our chiefest frontiers and fortifications
must be set up before that part of the soul, our most careful
watch and sentinel placed upon our affections, lest the devil
enter there and depopulate the whole Christian, and plant
the atheist in his room. To this purpose we must examine
what seeds are already sown, what treachery is a working
Lev. xix.
ive
(Ps, x. 4. ]
014 SERMON XXVIII.
within; and no doubt most of us at the first cast of the eye
shall find great store, unless we be partial to ourselves, and
bring in a verdict of mercy, and construe that weakness,
which indeed signifies atheism.
When upon examination we find our lives undermining
our belief, our practices denying the authority of Scripture,
and no whit forwarder to any Christian duty upon its com-
mands; when we find God’s essence and attributes reviled
and scoffed at in our conversation, His omnipresence con-
temned by our confidence in sinning, and argued against
by our banishing God out of all our thoughts, His all-suffi-
ciency doubted of by our distrusts, and our scorn to depend
upon it; when we perceive that our carriages do fall off at
this part of our belief in Christ, that He shall come again
to be our Judge, and by our neglect of those works, espe-
cially of mercy, which He shall then require of us, shew that
indeed we expect Him not, or think of Him as a Judge, but
only as a Saviour; when we observe our wills resisting the
gifts, and falsifying the attribute, whilst our Creed confesses
the person of the Holy Ghost, and see how little, how
nothing of the sanctifying Spirit, of the earnest of our re-
generation is in our hearts, and we still stupidly senseless of
the want; when we believe forgiveness of sins, and that
only upon condition of repentance, and yet abhor so much
as to hear or think of the performing of it, or to make good
that mercy to others which ourselves challenge of God;
lastly, when we prove to ourselves, and all the world beside,
by our requirmg of a present reward for all our goodness,
and ruling our religion to our earthly profit, by our impa-
tience of any affliction, by our heathenish neglect, and stu-
pidity, and riot, that we do not in earnest look for the re-
surrection to life; when, I say, by a just, but exact survey
and inquest, we find these so many degrees of secret atheism
in us, then must we shrift, and purge, and cleanse, and rinse
our souls from these dregs of heathenism; then must we
humble ourselves below the dust, and not dare to look the
veriest Gentile in the face, till we have removed this plague
from us. And do Thou, O Lord, assist our endeavours, and
by the violence of Thy Spirit force and ravish us in our lives,
as well as belief, to a sincere acknowledgment and expres-
SERMON XXVIII. 615
sion of every minute part of that religion which is purely
Christian, that we may adore Thee in our hearts as well as
our brains, and being sanctified throughout, from any tinc-
ture, or colour, or suspicion of irreligion in either power of
our soul, we may glorify Thee here, and be glorified by Thee
hereafter.
Now to Him which hath elected us, hath, &c.
SERMON XXIX.
2 Per. ui. 3.
Scoffers walking after their own lusts.
Tr is an excellent observation of Aristotle’s, that rich men
are naturally most contumelious, most given to abuse and de-
ride others, which he expresses thus, in the seventh of his Poli-
tics*; ἡ δὲ THs εὐτυχίας ἀπόλαυσις Kal TO σχολάζειν μετ᾽ εἰρή-
νης, ὑβριστὰς ποιεῖ μᾶλλον. The contentment which they
enjoy in the continuance of their worldly happiness, the per-
petual rest, and quiet, and tranquillity, which their plenty
bestows on them, makes them contemn and despise the estate
of any other man in the world; upon this conceit, saith the
same Aristotle”, (ὅτε ὑπερέχειν φαίνονται.) that their hap-
piness is elevated infinitely above the ordinary pitch; that
whatever contentments any other sort of people can glory or
delight in, is but some imaginary, slight, poor happiness that
men are fain to solace themselves withal, to keep them from
melancholy, all far enough below the size of their felicity,
which all agreeable circumstances have conspired to make
exactly complete. Hence is it that you shall ordinarily
observe the rich man, in this confidence of his opinion, that
no man is happy but himself, either contemn or pity the
poverty, and improvidence, and perhaps the sottishness of
such spirits, that can rejoice or boast in the possession of
wisdom, knowledge, nay, even of God’s graces; no object is
more ridiculous in his eye, than either a scholar or a Christian,
that knows not the value of riches: for saith Aristotle, 6 πλοῦ-
Tos οἷον τιμή τις ἐστὶ τῆς ἀξίας τῶν ἄλλων, διὸ φαίνεται πάντα
ὦνια εἶναι αὐτοῦ, “ Money is reckoned the price of all things
* [Aristot. Polit., lib. vii. ο. 15.] > [ Aristot. Rhetor., lib. ii. ο. 16.}
SERMON XXIX. 617
else,” that which can easily purchase whatever else we can
stand in need of ; and therefore the rich man, if he could think
learning and religion worth any thing, having his money by
him (which is in effect every thing) thinks he can call for
them when he pleases. In the mean, he hath more wit than
to forsake his pleasures, and go to school to the Stoic, to
divest himself of his robes, and put on the sourness, the
rigid, sad behaviour which the profession of wisdom or
Christianity requires. He is better pleased in his present
pomp, than to go and woo that misery and ruggedness,
which the severity of discipline looks for. Let silly beggars
boast of the contents of wisdom or hopes of heaven, at mihi
plaudo domi‘, his coffers at home are better companions than
all the melancholy of books, or sullen solaces of the spirit.
He hath learnt by experience, that he ought to pity and
contemn these fictions of delight which the poets fetch from
the Fortunate Islands to delude, and cozen, and comfort
beggars: his glory, and pride, and riches, are happiness
indeed, and whatever else the poverty of the world can
boast of, are objects not of his envy but his scorn.
What we have hitherto noted to you concerning the rich
man is appliable on the same grounds to any sort of people
which have fixed upon any worldly content, and resolved
upon some one object, beside which they will never value or
prize any thing. Thus the epicure or voluptuous man, who
hath set up his idol lust, to whom he owes all his sacrifice,
and from whom he expects all his good fortune, that hath
fixed his pillars, and cast his anchor, and is peremptorily
constant in his course, that he is resolved for ever to walk
in; this man, I say, being possessed with an opinion of the
happiness which he is placed in, like the sun in his pride,
rejoices to run his course, and scorns any contrary motion
that he meets or hears of; and only observes the ways of
virtue and religion, to hate and laugh at them; and the
further he walks, the deeper he is engaged in this humour
of self-content, and contempt of others, of security, and
scoffing. For this is the force and implicit argument co-
vertly contained in the close of these words, “There shall
come in the last days scoffers,” &c.; i.e. this resolution to
[ Horat. Sat. i. 1. 65.]
[Wisd. 11,
21.]
618 SERMON XXIX.
walk on in their own lusts hath brought them to this pitch
of atheism, to scoff and deride both God and goodness.
“There shall,” &c.
We have heretofore divided these words, and in them
observed and handled already the sin of atheism, together
with the subjects in which it works, Christians of the last
times, noted from this prophetic speech, “There shall come
in the last days scoffers.” We now come to the second par-
ticular, the motive or impellent to this sin, a liberty which
men give themselves, and a content which they take to walk
after their own lusts.
The second chapter of the Wisdom of Solomon is an ex-
cellent description of the atheist: and though it be of apo-
cryphal authority, yet it is of most divine canonical truth.
I could find in my heart, nay, I can scarce hold from read-
ing and paraphrasing the whole chapter to you; it is so
solid, so strong, so perfect a discourse upon this theme, it
contains so many strains of atheistical reason in opposition
to godliness, and the root, and growth, and maturity of this
tree of knowledge and death, that the clear understanding
of that one place might suffice without any enlargement of
proofs or expressions. But for brevity sake, and on promise
that you will at your leisure survey it, I will omit to insist
on it: only in the end of the twenty-first verse, after all the
expressions of their atheistical counsels, you have the rea-
son, or motive, or first worker of all, “ for their own wicked-
ness hath blinded them ;” their stupid perseverance in those
dark ways, in that black Tophet on earth, habituate custom
of sinning, had so thickened their sight, had drawn such a
film over their eyes, that in the judgment of divine affairs
they were stark blind: they could see nothing in all the
mystery of godliness which was worth embracing, and there-
fore had no employment but to walk on after their own
lusts, and to scoff at those that were so foolishly friendly to
them as to call them out of their way: they were well
enough acquainted with their own paths, they could walk
them blindfold, and therefore had more wit than forsake the
road for a nearer by-way. The issue of all is this, that a
voluptuous course of life is a great promoter and advancer of
atheism: there had never been so many scoffers in the Chris-
SERMON XXIX. 619
tian world, had there not been also those that were resolute
to walk after their own lusts.
In the first verse of the Psalms, there be steps and rounds,
and gradations of a sinner specified; 1. Walking in the coun-
sel of the ungodly; 2. Standing in the way of sinners; 3.
Sitting in the seat of the scorner: the two first beg de-
grees in his motion, several stages of his journey to this ἀκμὴ,
or top pitch of sinning in the last. Walking in the counsel
of the ungodly is the first entrance to his course ; and he that
hath such a rise as this, hath a great advantage of all other
sinners; he will perform his race with speed, and come sud-
denly to his goal. This deliberate walking in the ways, and
with the companions and contrivers of ungodliness, this par-
taking and prosecuting of the counsels, the enjoying this,
familiarity with sin, proves a strong engagement to continue
and persevere, and delight in its acquaintance. Yet because
walking is a laborious motion, and will tire the sinner in
time, he is fain to betake himself to an easier posture, and
that is standing in the way of sinners, continuing in a still,
sober, quiet, stupid tranquillity of sinning, standing like a
Mercury’s post in the midst of a road, never removed or
stirred an inch, though never so justled by the passengers.
Let all the contrary virtues never so thwart and cross him,
he hath fixed his station, and neither force nor allurements
shall make him move. Yet because standing also is a painful
posture, with which the valiantest legs will at last be numbed,
if not tired, he hath in the last place his chair of ease and
state, and here he sets up his rest, here he sins with as much
majesty as delight: 1. in cathedra, as a seat of greatness,
lording it, and sinning imperiously, commanding every spec-
tator to follow his example of scoffing at God and goodness :
2. in cathedra, as a seat of authority, sinning doctorally, and
magisterially, by his practice defining the lawfulness of
these scoffs, even setting up a school of atheism: and 8. in
cathedra, as a seat of rest, and ease, and pleasure, which he is
resolved never to rise out of, which he hath reposed himself
in, that he may laugh at ease, and without any pains or
trouble or charges blaspheme God for ever. And for the
most part indeed he proves as bad as his resolution, having
once given himself this licence of laughing at and deriding
620 SERMON XXIX.
religion, he seldom ever recovers himself to a sober counte-
nance; like men whose custom of scoffing hath made wry-
mouthed, he lives and continues, and for the most part dies
scoffing. He comes as it were laughing into hell, and seldom
forsakes this habit of profaneness, till horror hath put smiling
out of date. There is not a sin in the world that sits closer
to him which hath once entertained it, and he that is once a
merry atheist, seldom, if ever, proves a sad sober Christian.
He is seated in his chair of scorning, and contemns the mercy
of that Spirit that should take him out of it. Thus you see,
that walking in the steps, and standing in the way, 1. 6. fol-
lowing the commands of their own lusts, they are soon arrived
to the pitch of atheists, to the chair of scorners, and then
there is but little preferment more that they are capable of,
unless they will strive with Lucifer for pre-eminence in hell,
or else challenge Rabshakeh to rail, or Julian to blaspheme.
But this is the highest degree of scoffers, and I hope the devil
hath but few such valiant, bold, forward champions in the
world, since Julian or Lucian’s time. And therefore I hope
I have pricked no man’s conscience here whilst I have spoke
of them; but I have formerly proved that there be some lower,
tamer, secret degrees of atheism, which every man may chance
to spy in some angle or corner of his soul, some implicit arti-
ficial ways of scoffing, or abasing God, which most of us are
guilty of; and it will be worthy our pains to shew how these
seeds are warmed, and cherished, and animated by a licen-
tious life. Hippocrates‘ observes of the Scythians that they do
not swathe themselves, nor bind in their loins with any kind of
girdle, but go with their bodies very loose, that they may ride
the easier, which is the only exercise they use: and from
hence, saith he, they grow so corpulent and fleshy, so broad
and bulky, that they are both ugly and unwieldy, an eye-sore
to others and cumbersome to themselves: these accessions,
which in other people extend themselves proportionably in
length and breadth, in height as well as bulk, in them grow
all into thickness; so that you shall see a pigmy in stature
as big as a giant inthe girt. Thus is it with those whose affec-
tions are not ruled, and restrained in order, and within limits,
are not swathed and kept in, have not some set terms of tem-
4 Hippocrates, de Aqua, Aere et Loco. [ut supr. ]}
SERMON XXIX. 621
perance, and other virtues, beyond which they suffer not
themselves to fly out. If, I say, these affections within us be
by the owners left ungirt to their own freedom, they will
never grow upward toward heaven; they will still be dwarf-
ish, of small growth in religion; but yet like those Scythians,
they will run into a strange bulk and corpulence, into some
unwieldy misshapen forms of atheism, or the like. Certainly
they will grow into a greater breadth than the reasonable
soul will be able to manage; unless the spirit vouchsafe to
come down, and contract and call it into bounds, it will in-
crease beyond all proportion, beyond all acknowledgment of
God orreligion. We are used to say in nature, that all moist
things are apt to be contained in other terms, but hardly in
their own; the water is easily cooped up in a glass or bucket,
where there are boundaries to keep it in, but being let loose
on a table or a floor, it flies about and never stays again till
it meet with some ocean or hollow place which may inclose,
and bestow the consistency on it which it has not of itself.
Thus you may see a river, whilst it is kept within the chan-
nel, go on in its stream and course very soberly and orderly,
but when it hath overswelled the banks which before kept it in,
then doth it run about the pastures, scorns to be kept within
any compass. Thus is it with the soul of man; if it be ordered
within terms and bounds, if it have a strict hand held over it,
if it be curbed and brought to its postures, if it have reason and
grace, and a careful tutor to order it, you shall find it as tame
a creature as you need deal with; it will never straggle or
stray beyond the confines which the spirit hath set it; the
reason is, because though it be in itself fluid and moist, and
ready to run about like water, yet Deus firmavit aquas, “ God Gen. i. 7.
hath made a firmament betwixt the waters,” as He did Gen.
i. 7,1.e. He hath established it, and given it a consistency, that
it should not flow or pour itself out beyond its place. But
if this soul of man be left to its own nature, to its own fluid,
wild, incontinent condition, it presently runs out into an
ocean, never stays, or considers, or consults, but rushes head-
long into all inordinacy; having neither the reins of reason
nor God to keep it in, it never thinks of either of them,
and unless by chance, or by God’s mercy, it fall into their
hands, it is likely to run riot for ever. Being once let loose,
622 SERMON XXIX.
it ranges, as if there were neither power on earth to quell nor
in heaven to punish it. Thus do you see how fiuid, how in-
constant the soul is of its own accord, how prone it is, how
naturally inclined to run over like a stream over the banks,
and if it be not swathed, and kept in, if it be left to the licen-
tious condition of itself, how ready is it to contemn both rea-
son and God, and run headlong into atheism. Nay, we need
not speak so mercifully of it, this very licentiousness is the
actual renouncing of religion, this very “ walking after their
own lusts,” is not only a motive to this sin of scoffing, but the
very sin itself.
A false conception in the womb is only a rude, confused,
ugly chaos, a mere lump of flesh, of no kind of figure or
resemblance, gives only disappoitment, danger, and torment
to the mother. It is the soul at its entrance which defines,
and trims, and polishes into a body, that gives it eyes, and
ears, and legs, and hands, which before it had not distinctly
and severally, but only rudely altogether with that mass or
lump. ‘Thus is it with the man, till religion hath entered
into him as a soul to inform and fashion him; as long as
he lives thus at large, having no terms, or bounds, or limits
to his actions, having no form, or figure, or certain motion
defined him, he is a mola, a mere lump of man, an arrant
atheist ; you cannot discern any features or lineaments of a
Christian in him; he hath neither eyes to see, nor ears to
hear, nor hands to practise any duty that belongs to his
peace. Only it is religion must take him up, must smooth
and dress him over, and according to its etymon must 7e-
ligure, swathe and bind up this loose piece of flesh, must
animate and inform him, must reduce him to some set form
of Christianity, or else he is likely after a long and fruitless
travel to appear a deformed monstrous atheist. But not to
deal any longer upon similes, lest we seem to confound and
perplex a truth by explaining it, I told you the licentious,
voluptuous life was itself perfect heathenism. For can you
imagine a man to be any but a Gentile, who hath abandoned
all love, all awe, all fear, all care of God—any one of which
would much contract and draw him into compass—who hath
utterly put off every garb of a Christian, who hath enjoyed
the reins so long, that now he is not sensible, or at least
SERMON XXIX. 623
contemns the curb or snaffle if he be but checked with it,
gets it in his teeth and runs away with it more fiercely.
The heathen are noted not so much that they worshipped no
god at all, but that they worshipped so many, and none of
them the true. Every great friend they had, every delight
and pleasure, every thing that was worth praying for, straight
proved their god, and had its special temple erected for its
worship. So that do but imagine one of them every day
worshipping every god whom he acknowledged, in its several
oratory, spending his whole life, and that too little too, in
running from one temple to another, and you have described
our licentions man posting on perpetually to his sensual de-
votions, worshipping, adoring, and sacrificing every minute
of his life, to some idol-vanity, and bestowing as much pains
and charges in his profane, heathenish pleasures, as ever
the Gentiles did on their false gods, or the most superero-
gating papist on their true.
We are wont to say in divinity “, and that without an hy-
perbole, that every commission of sin is a kind of idolatry, an
incurvation, and bending down of the soul to some creature,
which should always be erect, looking up to heaven, from
whence it was infused, like water naturally inclined to climb
and ascend as high as the fountain, or head from whence it
sprang. And then certainly a licentious life is a perpetual
idolatry, a supineness, and proneness, and incurvation of the
soul to somewhat that deserves to be called an idol, i. 6.
either in St. Paul’s acceptation of it, nothing—“ an idol is 1 Cor. viii.
nothing,” or else, in the most honourable signification, only =
an image, or some rude likeness or representation of God.
We are the image of God ourselves, and whatsoever is below
us, is but an imperfect draught of Him, containing some linea-
ments, some confused resemblances of His power which
created them, have no being of their own, but only as
shadows which the light doth cast. And therefore every
love, every bow, every cringe which we make to any creature,
is the wooing and worshipping of an image at best, in plain
terms of an idol, nothing. What degree then of idolatry
have they attained to, who every minute of their lives bow
down and worship, make it their trade and calling for ever
* Wiggers in 14" secunde, quest. 1. art. 5. p. 27, 28.
[ Mat. vi.
24. |
624 SERMON XXIX.
to be a soliciting some pleasure or other! some exquisite
piece of sensuality to bless and make them happy, which
have no other shrines to set up, but only to their own lust,
to which they do so crouch, and creep, and crawl, that they
are never able tg stand upright again: like those trees
which the papists talk of, which by bowing to our Lady’s
house, when in walks by the wood toward Loretto, have
ever since stood stooping. Thus do you see how the latter
part of my text hath overtook the former: the walking after
his own lusts becomes a scoffer, the licentious man proceeded
atheist, and that with ease, his very voluptuous life is a kind
of atheism; and the reasons of this are obvious, you need not
seek or search far for them.
For first, this walking in their own lusts, notes an habit
gathered out of many acts; he hath walked there a long
while, and therefore now hath the skill of it, walks on con-
fidently, and carelessly, without any rub or thought of stop-
ping. And contrary to this, the worship of God, of which
atheism is a privation, is an holy, religious habit of piety and
obedience. Now we know two contrary habits cannot consist
or be together in the same subject. An habit and its opposite
privation are incompatible, light and darkness at the same
time, though they may seem to meet sometimes as in twilight ;
but for two opposite positive habits, never any man’s conceit
was so bold or fantastical as to join them; you cannot ima-
gine one, but you must remove the other. You may suppose
a man distempered or weak, which is a privation of health,
and yet suppose him pretty healthy, as long as his natu-
ral strength is able to overcome it; but can you suppose a
man in a violent fever actually upon him, and yet still ima-
gine him in perfect health? Thus is it with a sinner, who
hath given himself over to the tyranny and impotency of his
lusts, he hath utterly put off all degrees, all sparks of any
habit of religion, according to that of our Saviour, “you
cannot serve God and mammon,” where mammon signifying
in a vast extent the god of this world, imports all lusts, all
earthly vanities, which any habituate sinner deifies.
Secondly, every habit notes a delight, an acquiescence, and
joy, in enjoying of that which through many actions, perhaps
some brunts and rubs, he hath at last arrived to. Now this
i is ee i i ee a ee
SERMON XXIX. 625
delight and contentation, that it may be complete, is impa-
tient of any other encumbrance, which at any time may come
in to interrupt or disorder it. If any thing so happen, it is
never quiet, till it have removed it. The scholar that hath
all his life laboured, and at last attained to some habit of
knowledge, and then resolves to enjoy the happiness and
fruits of learning, in the quiet and rest of a perpetual con-
templation, is impatient if any piece of ignorance cross or
thwart him in his walk, he will to his books again, and never
rest till he hath overcome and turned it out. Thus doth the
sensual man, being come to the ἀκμὴ, and pitch, and entered
into the paradise of his worldly joys, if he do but meet with
any jar, if he feel any pluck or twinge from his conscience,
any grudge or compunction of the spirit within him, any
spark or heat, or warmth of religious fear in his breast, he
will never rest till he hath abandoned it, he is impatient of
such a qualm of godliness, he must needs put it over, he is
sick at heart till he hath disgorged himself of this choler, and
then returns securely godless to his walk, having banished
God out of all his thoughts. Thus shall you see the atheist [Ps. x. 14.]
on his humour, for want of some compunction at home,
grumble at every godly man or action which they saw in
the street. In the 2nd of Wisdom at the 14th; “He is Wisd. ii.
grievous unto us to behold, he was made to reprove our 1
thoughts ;” and they do not return to their content, they
are not pleased again, till they have gotten him into their
inquisition, to examine him with despitefulness and_tor-
ture. Thus do they abhor, and stifle, and strangle every ver:.19.
godly action in others, or motion in themselves, because the
holiness of the one is an exprobation to their profaneness,
and the other was a pang of conscience, made, as it were on
purpose, by God to reprove their thoughts.
Thirdly, this walking in the text, though it be with some
motion, yet it is a slow one, a kind of walking in one’s sleep, or
that of amelancholy man, that can walk till he be wet through,
and not mark that it rained. I say, it notes here an heavy,
drowsy, unactive habit, expressed by the Psalmist by sitting
in a chair, as we shewed you; it notes a kind of churlish reso-
luteness, to walk on, whatever come in his way; he is grown
even a passive to his lusts, he doth not so much act as suffer
HAMMOND- ss
Ecclus.
xxii. 8,
626 SERMON XXIX.
them, he walks on snorting in his road; do what you can, you
shall neither tw nor wake him. Now this slow, drowsy,
unactive habit begets a kind of numbness in him, a sluggish,
sullen stupidity over all his faculties, that even a spur or
goad cannot rouse him ; all the pores, as it were, and passages,
and entries to the soul are so stopped and bunged up, all
his affections are grown so gross and brawny, so hardened and
incrassate, that no air or breath from heaven can pierce it.
He that tells him of religion, or God, or virtue, is as he that
waketh one from a sound sleep; he that telleth such a fool a
tale of wisdom, speaketh to one in “a slumber, and when he
hath told his tale, he will say, What is the matter?” Thus do
you see; 1. the repugnance and inconsistence of a voluptuous
life and religion; 2. the delight; 3. the stupidity of this
habit; each of which have made a place for the libertine,
and set him in the chair of the scorner. And all this while
methinks I have but talked to your ears; now that your
hearts and affections may partake of the sound, that the
softer waxy part of you may receive some impression from
this discourse, let us close all with an application.
And, first, from the guilt and dangerous condition of a licen-
tious life, to labour by all means possible to keep out of it.
He that is once engaged in it, goes on with a great deal of
content, and in the midst of his pleasures on the one side,
and carnal security on the other, his understanding, and will,
and senses are lulled into a lethargy, nay, the very fancy in
him is asleep, which in other sleeps is most active; he never
imagines, never dreams of any fear or danger, either God
or devil. Oh what a lamentable woeful estate is it to be thus
sick beyond a sense of our disease, to be so near a spiritual
death, and not so much as feel our weakness! Oh what an
horrid thing it were to pass away in such a sleep, and never
observe ourselves near death, till Satan hath arrested beyond
bail, to sleep on and snort, as men without dread or danger,
till the torments of hell should awake us! You cannot ima-
gine how easy a thing it is for an habituate sinner to fall into
the devil’s paws before he thinks of it, as a melancholy man
walking in the dark may be drowned in a pit, and no man
hear him complain that he is fallen.
Again, we are wont to say that custom is another nature,
SERMON XXIX. 627
and those things which we have brought ourselves up to, we
can as ill put off, as our constitution or disposition. Now
those things which spring from the nature of any thing, are
inseparable from the subject ; banish them as oft as you will,
usque recurrent’, they will return again as to their home, they
cannot subsist any where else, they dwell there. So wallow-
ing in the mire being a condition natural to the swine, can
never be extorted from them: wash them, rince them, purge
them with hyssop, as soon as ever they meet with mire again,
they will into it. Their swinish nature hath such an in-
fluence on them, that all care or art cannot forbid or hinder
this effect of it. So that a customary sinner, who hath as it
were made lust a part of his nature, hath incorporated pro-
faneness, and grafted it into his affections, can as hardly
be rid of it, as a subject of his property ; it is possible for
fear, or want of opportunity sometime to keep him in, and
make him abstain: the loadstone may lie quiet, whilst no
iron is within ken, or it may be held by force in its presence ;
but give it materials and leave to work, and it draws inconti-
nently. So for all his temporary forbearance, upon some
either policy or necessity, the habituate sinner hath not yet
given over his habit. Leave him to himself, give him room
and opportunity, and he will hold no longer. If he be once
advanced to this pitch of sin to be walking after his own
lusts, he may possibly be driven back with a storm or
thunder; but he will hardly give over his walk, he will
forward again as soon as ever the tempest is over. Nay
farther, even when he wants objects and opportunities, he
will yet shew his condition, he will betray the desire and
good affection he bears to his old lusts; his discourse or
fashions argue him incontinently bent, even when he is at
the stanchest. As Aristotle® observes of the fearful man,
that even when no formidable object is near, he falls into
many frights: so the voluptuous man’s fancy is perpetually
possessed with the meditation of his own ways, when some
disease or necessity will not let him walk. In brief, unless
this second nature be quite taken out of him, and another holy
spiritual nature created in its room, unless a stronger come [Luke xi.
and bind this devil and dispossess him of it, he hath small 71:1
f (Hor. Epist. i. 10. 24.] ® [ Arist. de Anima, lib. i. ο, 1.]
ss2
628 SERMON XXIX.
hopes of getting himself out of his dominion and tyranny ;
there is a great deal more stir in the converting of one
customary sinner, than of a thousand others; it is not to
be accomplished without a kind of death and resurrection,
without a new creation of another nature. So that (if we
should judge of God’s actions by our own) the Spirit should
seem to be put to more pains and trouble with this one
habituate, than in the ordinary business of converting many
a tamer sinner. This is enough by the desperateness of the
cure to move you to study some art, some physic of preven-
tion, lest when it is grown upon you, it be too late to enquire
for remedies. How should we dare to entertain and natu-
ralize such an evil spirit within us, which if ever he be ravished
out of us again, cannot without tearing, and torturing, and
rending even our whole nature in pieces! If we must needs
be sinful, yet let us keep within a moderation, let us not so
follow the devil’s works, as to transubstantiate ourselves into
his nature; let us not put off our manhood with our in-
tegrity, and though we cannot be saints, let us keep our-
selves men. It is a degree of innocence not to be extremely
wicked, and a piece of godliness not to be atheists. Our
lust is an infinite thing, said a philosopher, (ἀπέραντος ἐπι-
θυμία, Jamblichus *,) and he that walks after it hath an end-
less journey: there is no hope that he that hath so far to
go, will ever have leisure to sit still. And therefore I say,
if we must needs sin, yet let us not engage ourselves to sin
for ever: if our being men lays a necessity of sinning on us,
let our care to stay whilst it is possible for us, prove that we
do not sin like devils, whose sin is their glory, and their
resolution peremptory, never to give over sinning; and so
may ours seem, and in all likelihood prove to be, if we give
ourselves liberty to walk after our own lusts.
Secondly, if our lusts be such dangerous paths to walk in,
and this in that very respect as they are our own in oppo-
sition to God’s commands; if they are the straight direct way
to atheism, nay atheism itself: then what care and circum-
spection is required at every setting down of our feet, at
every entrance on any action, lest there be a serpent in the
way, some piece of profaneness in every enterprise we enter
h [Jamblichus Protrept, c. xvii. ]
SERMON XXIX. 629
on of ourselves! How ought we to fear, to suspect, and balk
any way that is our own! For where it is atheism to walk,
there surely it is a sin to tread: and where we have once
ventured to tread, we shall be shrewdly tempted to walk ;
every step we have safely taken being an encouragement to
a second. Verebar omnia opera mea, saith Job, “I feared all
my works:”’ whatever action I could entitle myself to, me-
thought there was some danger in it, I was afraid it was
not right as it should be, I should never be able to justify
it. This is an excellent trial of all our serious deliberate
actions, to mark whether they are our own or no, whether
we went about them on our own heads, without our war-
rant or directions from God: if we did, it is much to be
doubted there is some poison, some guilt in them, some-
thing that deserves to be feared, and fled from. This very
suspecting of our own ways, will alien us from our own
lusts, will bend us nearer to God, and never suffer us to
dare to venture where He hath not secured us; will join us
as it were in an engine to God Himself, where the lower
wheels never begin to move without the example and govern-
ment of the higher. If you can but persuade yourself to
fear your own ways, it will be a good stop of your progress
to atheism. Iam confident the devil will never get you to
walk in your own lusts.
Thirdly, if walking in our own lusts be direct atheism,
what shall we think of them who make it a piece of religion
and holy policy-to do so? Beloved, there be some learned
catechised atheists, who upon confidence of an absolute
eternal predestination of every man in the world that shall
ever possibly be saved, set up their rest there, and expect
what God will do with them. It is to no purpose to hope God
will alter the decree; they are resolved to leave all to God,
and if they perish, they perish. Mark with me, is not this
a religious atheism to attribute so much to God as to become
careless of Him, so to depend as never to think on Him, and
by granting His decree in our understanding, to deny His
Godhead in our conversation? He that lives negligently on
confidence that his care may be spared, that if there be any
salvation for him, God will work it out without his fear
or trembling: he that believes God’s election so absolute,
{Job ix.
28. Vulg.]
1 John
1:1, 3.
[ Gen. iv.
18,1
630 SERMON XXIX.
that himself hath nothing to do in the business; whilst he
expects mercy, makes himself uncapable of it; and though
he acknowledge a resurrection, lives as though he looked to
be annihilated. Certainly he that expects God should send
him a fruitful harvest, will himself manure the ground; he
that hopes will labour; according to that, 1 John iii. 3, “ He
that hath this hope in him purifies himself,’ &c. So that
whosoever relies on God for salvation, and in the midst of
his hopes stands idle, and walks after his own lusts, by his
very actions confutes his thoughts, and will not in a manner
suffer God to have elected him, by going on in such repro-
bate courses.
Lastly, if it be this confident walking after our own lusts,
which is here the expression of atheism, then here is a com-
fort for some fearful sinners, who finding themselves not yet
taken up quite from a licentious life, suspect, and would be
in danger to despair of themselves as atheists. It is a
blessed tenderness to feel every sin in ourselves at the
greatest advantage; to aggravate and represent it to our
conscience in the horridest shape; but there is a care also
to be had, that we give not ourselves over as desperate ;
Cain lied when he said his sin was greater than could be
either borne or forgiven. When the physicians have given
one over, at φύσεις ἱατροὶ νούσων, nature hath its spring
and plunge, and sometimes quits and overcomes the disease.
If thou art in this dangerous walk, and strivest and heavest,
and canst not get out of it, yet sorrow not as one without
hope: this very regret and reluctancy, this striving and
plunging is a good symptom. If thou wilt continue with
a good courage, and set thyself to it to the purpose, be con-
fident thou shalt overcome the difficulty. If this sin be a
walking, then every stop is a cessation, every check a degree
to integrity, every godly thought or desire a pawn from God
that He will give thee strength to victory: and if thou do but
nourish and cherish every such reluctancy, every such gra-
cious motion in thyself, thou mayest with courage expect a
gracious calm deliverance out of these storms and tempests.
And let us all labour, and endeavour, and pray that we may
be loosed from these toils and gins, and engagements of our
' Joan. Philoponus, i. de Anima,
SERMON XXIX. 631
own lusts, and being entered into a more religious severe
course here, than the atheism of our ways would counsel us
to, we may obtain the end, and rest, and consummation, and
reward of our course hereafter.
Now to Him which hath elected us, &c, ,
1 Tim. iv.
11.
Gal. vi.
14.
SERMON XXX.
1 Trm. i. 15.
Of whom I am the chief.
Tue chief business of our Apostle St. Paul in all his
Epistles is, what the main of every preacher ought to be,
exhortation. There is not one doctrinal point but contains
a precept to our understanding to believe it, nor moral dis-
course, but effectually implies an admonishment to our wills
to practise it. Now these exhortations are proposed either
vulgarly in the downright garb of precept, as, “ These things
command and teach,” &c., or in a more artificial, obscure,
enforcing way of rhetoric, as, “ God forbid that I should glory,
save in the cross of Christ, whereby the world is crucified to
me, and I unto the world ;” which though in words it seems
a protestation of St. Paul’s own resolution, yet in effect is a
most powerful exhortatory to every succeeding Christian to
glory only in the cross of Christ, and on it to crucify both
the world and himself. This method of reducing St. Paul to
exhortation I observe to you for the clearing of my text.
For this whole verse at the first view seems only a mere
thesis or point of belief, that Christ came into the world to
save sinners, illustrated and applied by the speaker as one,
and the chief of the number of those sinners to be saved.
But it contains a most rhetorical powerful exhortation to
both understanding and will; to believe this faithful saying,
“that Christ came,” &c. and to accept, lay hold of, and with all
our might to embrace and apply to each of ourselves this
great mercy, toward this great salvation bestowed on sinners
who can with humility confess their sins, and with faith lay
hold on the promise. And this is the business of the verse,
SERMON XXX. 633
and the plain matter of this obscure double exhortation to
every man’s understanding, that he believe “that Christ,” &c.;
to every man’s affections, that he humble himself, and teach
his heart, and that his tongue, to confess, Of all sinners, &c.
This text shall not be divided into parts—which were to dis-
order and distract the significancy of a proposition—but into
several considerations; for so it is to be conceived either
absolutely as a profession of St. Paul of himself; and there
we will enquire whether and how Paul was the chief of all
sinners: secondly, respectively to us, for whom this form of
confessing the state, and applying the salvation of sinners to
ourselves is set down.
And first, whether and how Paul was the chief of all sin-
ners; where we are to read him in a double estate, converted
and unconverted, expressed to us by his double name Paul
and Saul, Paul an Apostle of Jesus Christ, Saul a persecutor,
mad against the Christians; and that both these estates may
be contained in the text, although penned by Paul regene-
rated, may appear, in that the pronoun ἐγὼ, I, signifying the
whole complete person of Paul, restrains not the speech to
his present being only, but considers also what he had been ;
more especially set down at the thirteenth verse, “who was
before a blasphemer,” &c. So then Paul in his Saul-ship
being a blasphemer, a persecutor and injurious, and in sum,
a most violent, perverse, malicious unbeliever, was a chief
sinner, ranked in the front of the devil’s army; and this
needs no further proof or illustration. Yet seeing that
that age of the world had brought forth many other of
the same strain of violent unbelief, nothing inferior to Saul,
as may appear by those many that were guilty of Christ’s
death (as Saul in person was not), and those that so madly
stoned St. Stephen whilst Saul only “kept the witnesses’
clothes,’ and as the text speaks, “was consenting unto his
death ;” seeing, I say, that others of that age equalled, if not
exceeded Saul’s guilt, how can he be said above all other
sinners to be the chief? I think we shall not wrest or en-
large the text beside or beyond the meaning of the Holy
Ghost or Apostle, if in answer unto this we say that there
is intended not so much the greatness of his sins above
all sinners in the world, but the greatness of the miracle in
(ver. 13.]
Acts vii.
58.
viii. 1.
Rom. vi. 1.
634. SERMON XXX.
converting so great a sinner into so great a saint and Apo-
stle. So that the words shall run, Of all sinners that Christ
came into the world to save, and then prefer to such an emi-
nence, I am the chief, or as the word primarily signifies,
πρῶτος εἰμὶ, 1 am the first, i.e. Paul was the chief of all
converts, and Paul was the first that from so great a perse-
cutor of Christ was changed into so great, so glorious an
Apostle. For so it follows in the verses next after my text,
“For this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Christ
Jesus might shew forth all long-suffering,” &c. The issue
of all is this, that Saul unconverted was a very great sinner,
yet not the greatest of sinners absolutely, but for aught we
read in the New Testament, the greatest and first that was
called from such a degree of infidelity, a blasphemer, a per-
secutor, to so high a pitch of salvation, a saint, an Apostle,
yea, and greater than an Apostle; whence the observation
is, that though Saul were, yet every blasphemous sinner
cannot expect to be called from the depth of sin to regene-
racy and salvation. Although Saul being πρῶτος ἁμαρτω-
λῶν, “ the chief of sinners,” was called and saved; yet Saul
was also in another sense, for aught we read, πρῶτος, and
perhaps the last that from so great a riot of sin obtained so
great salvation. Wherefore, O sinner, be not presumptuous
from Paul’s example, but from Paul’s single example begin
to suspect thy state, and fear that such a miracle of salvation
shall not be afforded thee. There hath been an opinion of
late revived, perhaps original among the Romans, that the
greatest sinner is the more likely object of God’s mercy, or
subject of His grace, than the mere moral man, whom either
natural fear, or the like, not spiritual respects, hath re-
strained from those outrages of sin. The being of this
opinion in the primitive Romans, and the falseness of it,
is sufficiently proved by that expostulation of St. Paul,
“ Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God
forbid,” in answer to some, who, hearing that Christ came
into the world to save sinners, thought that the excess of
sin was the best qualification and only motive to provoke
and deserve a more abundant grace and certain salvation.
As if that Spirit which once, to manifest its power, called
Saul, in the midst of his madness breathing out threatenings
SERMON XXX. 635
and slaughters against the Church, would not call any but
those who had prepared themselves by the same degree of
madness; but required that men should make themselves
almost devils that they might be called into Christians; as
if that God which could out of stones, could not also out of (Mat. iii,
men raise up children unto Abraham; as if that Christ which 95]
raised up Lazarus, being dead four days, and as they thought 39.
stinking in his grave, could not as easily have healed him
whilst he was yet alive: whereas we read that Christ dealt
more on the cures of the impotent than resurrections of the
dead; that is, in a spiritual application, healed more from
the bed of languishment of their weaknesses and diseases,
than He raised out of the graves of trespasses and sins;
though some also hath He out of death quickened, to exalt
the power and miracle of His mercy. Yet hath not this
doctrine too been most confidently maintained among some
of our times? That there is more hope of the debauched
man, that he shall be called or saved, than of the mere
moral, honest man, who yet is in the state of unregene-
racy. Have not some men, defining this moral man by
the formal hypocrite, set him in the greatest opposition to
heaven? As if that degree of innocence, or rather not being
extremely sinful, which a moral care of our ways may bestow
on us, were a greater hindrance than promotion toward the
state of grace, and the natural man were so much the fur-
ther from God, the nearer he were to goodness, and no man
could hope to come to heaven but he that had knocked at
hell gates. I confess indeed that the Holy Ghost, where
He means to inhabit, hath no need of pains to prepare Him
a room, but can at His first knock open and cleanse, adorn
and beautify the most uncouth, ugly, and unsavoury heart
in the world. That omnipotent convincing Spirit can at the
same instant strike the most obdurate heart, and soften it,
and where it once enters cannot be repulsed by the most
sturdy habituate sin or devil. I confess likewise, that some
have been thus rather snatched than called, like the fire-
brands out of the fire, and by an ecstasy of the Spirit
inwardly in a minute changed from incarnate devils into
incarnate saints. So was Mary dispossessed of seven devils, [Luke viii.
who was after so highly promoted in Christ’s favour, that J
n xi,
Mark
Xvi. 9.
[ Luke viii.
27 sqq. |
woe
au
636 SERMON XXX.
she had the honour to be the first witness of the resurrec-
tion. So that Gadarene who had entrenched and fortified
himself among the tombs, and was garrisoned with an army
of devils, so that he brake fetters and chains, and could not
be tamed or kept in any compass, yet in a minute at Christ’s
word sent forth a legion of fiends sufficient to people and de-
stroy a colony of swine. And so was Paul in my text, in a
minute at Christ’s call delivered of a multitude of blasphem-
ous malicious spirits, and straight became the joy of angels,
the Apostle of the Gentiles. Yet meantime, these miracu-
lous but rarer examples must not prescribe and set up, must
not become a rule and encourage any one to Saul’s madness
on confidence of Paul’s conversion, to a more impetuous
course of sinning, that he may become a more glorious
saint. It is a wrong way to heaven to dig into the deep,
and a brutish arrogance to hope that God will the more
eagerly woo us, the further our sins have divorced us from
Him. If some, as hath been said, have been caught or
strucken in the height of their rebellions, or in the fulness
of the evil spirit called to a wane,—as diseases in the ἀκμὴ,
or top-pitch, are wont to decay and weaken into health
again,—if there have been some of these, as my Apostle,
raised from the depth of sin, as Lazarus from the stench of
the grave, yet these in respect of others more softly and
ordinarily called, are found few in number; and such as
were appointed for the miracles as well as the objects of
God’s mercy. Hence it is that a strange disorder hath most
times accompanied this extraordinary conversion of more
violent outrageous sinners. Our Apostle—to go no further
—was to be cast into a trance, and his regeneration not to
be accomplished without a kind of death and resurrection,
whereas others who are better morally qualified, or rather
are less hardened in the sins of unregeneracy, do answer at
the softest knock or whisperingest call of the Spirit, and at
His beckon will come after Him. More might be said of
this point, how St. Paul was most notably converted ; that
he had the alleviation of ignorance, for which causé, as he
i. says himself, he found mercy, and that others are not pro-
bably to expect the like miracle, who have not those insuper-
able prepossessions from custom and religion; but that this
SERMON XXX. 637
is not the business of the text, but a precognoscendum or
passage to the clearing of it. Briefly therefore to conclude
this note, Paul is the chief example mentioned in Scripture,
and there be not many, though some more, that were called
from the height of impiety, from the gall of bitterness, to
this mystical third heaven, or so high degree of saint and
apostle. The more ordinary course of God’s proceeding—
if we may possibly judge of the decree by events and exam-
ples—is to call such to the state of grace, and so conse-
quently of glory, who have passed their unregeneracy most
innocently, and kept themselves least polluted from the
stains of habituate wickedness, that is, have lived as much
as natural men can do, in the plainest, honestest course of
morality, it being presupposed that among all other moral
virtues they have purchased humility, the best—if there be
any preparative—for the receiving of grace. Meanwhile we
are not to be mistaken, as if we thought God’s purposes tied
to man’s good behaviour, or man’s moral goodness to woo
and allure God’s Spirit, as that the Almighty is not equally
able to sanctify the foulest soul by His converting grace,
and the less polluted; or that He requires man’s prepara-
tion: but our position is, that in ordinary charitable reason
we ought to judge more comfortably, and hope more confi-
dently of a mere moral man naturally more careful of his
ways, that he shall be both called and saved, that God will
with His Spirit perfect and crown his morally good, though
imperfect endeavours, than of another more debauched sin-
ner utterly negligent of the commands of either God or
nature. Which position I have in brief proved, though
nothing so largely as I might, in confutation of them who do
utterly condemn unregenerate morality, and deject it below
the lowest degree of profaneness, as if they would teach a
man his way to heaven by boasting arrogantly, what Paul
converted confesses humbly, I am the nearer to Christ’s
salvation, because of all sinners I am the chief. The use in
brief of this thesis shall be for those who not as yet find the
power of the regenerating Spirit in them, —for I am to fear
many of my auditors may be in this case, and I pray God
they feel, and work, and pray themselves out of it,—the use,
I say, is for those who are not yet full possessors of the Spirit,
Acts
xxiii. 1.
Acts x. 2,
638 SERMON XXX.
to labour to keep their unregeneracy spotless from the
greater offence, that if they are not yet called to the prefer-
ment of converts and saints, the second part of heaven, that
earthly city of God, that yet they will live orderly in that
lower regiment, wherein they yet remain, and be subject to
the law of nature, till it shall please God to take them into
a new commonwealth under the law of grace, to improve
their natural abilities to the height, and bind their hands
and hearts from the practice and study of outrageous sins
by those ordinary restraints which nature will afford us;
such as are a good disposition, education, and the like; not
to leave and refer all to the miraculous working of God, and
to increase our sins for the magnifying of the virtue in re-
calling us. God requires not this glory at our hands that
we should peremptorily over-damn ourselves, that He may
be the more honoured in saving us. His mercy is more
known to the world than to need this woeful foil to illus-
trate it. God is not wont to rake hell for converts, to
gather devils to make saints of; the kingdom of heaven
would suffer great violence, if only such should take it. If
Saul were infinitely sinful before he proved an Apostle,—
though by the way we hear him profess he had lived im all
good conscience,—yet expect not thou the same miracle, nor
think that the excess of sins is the cue that God ordinarily
takes to convert us. The fathers in an obedience to the
discipline and pedagogy of the old law, possessed their souls
in patience, expecting the prophesied approach of the new—
did not by a contempt of Moses precipitate and hasten the
coming of the Messias. Cornelius lived a long while de-
voutly, and gave much alms, till at last God called him, and
put him in a course to become a Christian: and do thou, if
thou art not yet called, wait the Lord’s leisure in a sober
moral conversation, and fright not Him from thee with un-
natural abominations. God is not likely to be wooed by
those courses which nature loathes, or to accept them whom
the world is ashamed of. In brief, remember Saul and Cor-
nelius; Saul, that he, not many, were called from a pro-
fessed blasphemer ; Cornelius, that before he was called he
prayed to God alway; and do thou endeavour to deserve the
like mercy, and then in thy prayer confess thine undesery-
SERMON XXX. 639
ing, and petition grace, as grace, that is not as our merit,
but as His free-will favour, not as the desert of our morality,
but a stream from the bounty of His mercy, who—we may
hope—will crown His common graces with the fulness of
His Spirit. And now, O powerful God, on those of us which
are yet unregenerate, bestow Thy restraining grace, which
may curb and stop our natural inordinacy, and by a sober,
careful, continent life, prepare us to a better capability
of Thy sanctifying Spirit, wherewith in good time Thou
shalt establish and seal us up to the day of redemption. And cet iv.
thus much concerning Saul unconverted, how of all sinners 0
he was the chief, not absolutely, that he surpassed the whole
world in rankness of sin, but respectively to his later state,
that few or none are read to have been translated from such
a pitch of sin to saintship. Now follows the second conside-
ration of him being proceeded Paul, i.e. converted, and then
the question is, whether and how Paul converted may be
said the chief of all sinners.
It were too speculative a depth for a popular sermon to
discuss the inherence and condition of sin in the regenerate;
the business will be brought home more profitably to our
practice if we drive it to this issue, that Paul in this place,
intending by his own example to direct others how to believe
the truth, and embrace and fasten on the efficacy of Christ’s
incarnation, hath no better motive to incite himself and
others toward it, than a recognition of his sins, that is, a
survey of the power of sin in him before, and a sense of the
relics of sin in him since his conversion. Whence the note
is, that the greatness of one’s sins makes the regenerate man
apply himself more fiercely to Christ. This faithful saying
was therefore to Paul worthy of all acceptation, because of
all simners he was the chief. St. Paul, as every regenerate
man, is to be observed in a treble posture, either casting his
eyes backward, or calling them in upon himself, or else look-
ing forward and aloof; and accordingly is to be conceived in
a treble meditation, either of his life past, or present state,
or future hopes. In the first posture and meditation you
may see, first, Paul alone, who was before a blasphemer, a per-
secutor, and injurious; secondly, all the regenerate together.
“ For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sin did work [Rom. vii.
5.]
Acts xxiii.
[5.]
2 Cor. xii.
1 Cor. ix.
27.
Rom. vii.
25.
Phil. iii.
13.
[ Hab. i.
16.]
2Gor:
xi. 7.
64.0 SERMON XXX.
in our members,” &c., and many the like. In the second
posture and meditation you may observe him retracting an
error, deprecating a temptation with earnest and repeated
intercessions, fighting with and harassing himself, “ beating
down his body, and keeping it in subjection, lest while he
preached to others he himself might be a cast-away.” In the
third posture we find him, where after a long disguise he
cries out, “I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord.”
And again most evidently, “ Forgetting those things that
are behind, and reaching out to those things which are be-
fore, 1 press toward the mark,” &c., like a racer in the heat
of his course whose eyes desire to anticipate his feet, and en-
joy the goal before he reach it. These three carriages of the
regenerate man fully prove our observation: for if either of
the two former sights could afford any content; if either his
former or present state did not sufficiently terrify him, he
would not be so eager on the third, it being the folly of
human pride and self-love to contemn any foreign aid as
long as it finds either appearance or hope of domestic. If in
the view of his former life he should find any thing either
good, or not extremely bad and sinful, he would under-prize
the mercy of that Saviour that redeemed him from so poor
a guilt; if he could observe in his present state any natural
firmness or stability, any inherent purity, any essential jus-
tice, he might possibly sacrifice to his own nets, and reckon-
ing himself in perfect peace with God, neither invoke and
seek, nor acknowledge a Mediator. But when in his former
life he shall find nothing but the matter and cause of horror
and amazement, nothing but hideous, ghastly affrightments,
yea, and a body of damnation: when in hope to mend him-
self, and ease his fears, he shall fly to the comfort of his
present converted state, and yet there also espy many thorns
of temptations, how can he but be frighted out of himself?
How can he but fly from the scene of those his torments,
and seek out and importune the mercy of a Saviour, which
may deliver him out of all his fears? After the example of
our Apostle in my text, where he does more peremptorily
apprehend Christ, and more bodily believe, “that He came
into the world to save sinners, because of all sinners he was
chief,” making his own sinfulness—being the object and ex-
SERMON XXX. 641
ternal motive of God’s mercy—an argument and internal
motive of his own faith and confidence. The plain meaning
of this thesis is that among men things are not alway valued
according to the merit of their nature, for then each com-
modity should be equally prized by all men, and the man in
health should bestow as much charges on physic as the
diseased: but each thing bears its several estimation by its
usefulness, and the riches of every merchandize is increased
accordingly as men to whom it is proffered do either use or
want it. Moreover, this usefulness is not to be reckoned of
according to truth, but opinion, not according to men’s real
wants, but according to the sense which they have of their
wants; so a man distracted, because he hath not so much
reason about him as to observe his disease, will contemn hel-
lebore, or any other the most precious recipe for this cure:
and generally no man will hasten to the physician, or justly
value his art and drugs, but he whom misery hath taught
the use of them. So then unless a man have been in some
spiritual danger, and by the converting Spirit be instructed
into a sense and apprehension of it, he will not sufficiently
observe the benefit and use of a deliverer: unless he feels
in himself some stings of the relics of his sin, some pricks
of the remaining Amorite, he will not take notice of the
want and necessity which he hath of Christ’s mediation.
But when he shall with a tenderness of memory survey the
guilt of his former state, from the imputation, not impor-
tunity whereof he is now justified, when he shall still feel
within him “the buffetings of Satan,’ and sensibly observe [2 Cor. xii.
himself not fully sanctified, then, and not before, will he with ὯΙ
a zealous earnestness apprehend the profit, yea, necessity of
a Saviour, whose assistance so nearly concerns him. The
second ground of this position is that an extraordinary unde-
served deliverance is by an afilicted man received with some
suspicion: the consideration of the greatness of the benefit
makes him doubt of the truth of it, and he will scarce believe
so important an happiness befallen him, because his misery
could neither expect nor hope it. Hence upon the first
notice of it he desires to ascertain it unto his sense, by a
sudden possession of it, and not at all to defer the enjoying
of that mercy which his former misery made infinitely “worthy
AMMON D. πὶ Ὁ
Mat. xx. 4.
John xx.
25.
Cant. iii
642 SERMON XXX.
of all acceptation.” Thus may you see a shipwrecked man
recovered to some refuge, cling about, and almost incorporate
himself unto it, because the fortune of his life depends on
that succour. The new regenerate man finding in the Scrip-
ture the promise of a Redeemer, which shall free him from
those engagements which his former bankrupt estate had
plunged him in, cannot delay so great an happiness, but with
a kind of tender fear and filial trembling, runs and strives, (as
the disciples to the sepulchre), to assure his necessitous soul
of this acceptable salvation: even sets upon his Saviour with
a kind of violence, and will seem to distrust His promise, till
His seal shall authorize and confirm it. Thus did the great-
ness of the work of the unexpected resurrection beget in
Thomas a suspicion and incredulity, “1 will not believe,” &c.,
where our charity may conjecture, that he above all the rest
was not absolutely resolved not to believe the resurrection,
but that he being absent at the first apparition, would not
take so important a miracle upon trust, but desired to have
that demonstrated to his sense, which did so nearly concern
his faith; that so by putting his finger into the print of the
nails, and thrusting his hand into His side, he might almost
consubstantiate and unite himself unto his Saviour, and at
once be assured of the truth, and partake of the profit of the
resurrection. Hear but the voice of the spouse, and any
further proofs shall be superfluous, where in violence and
jealousy of love she importunes the eternal presence of the
Beloved, “Set me as a seal upon thy heart, as a seal upon
thine arm, for love is strong as death, jealousy as cruel as the
grave: the coals thereof are coals of fire which hath a vehement
flame.” She had before often lost her beloved, which made
her so fiercely fasten on him, for having roused him, rui¢ in am-
plexus, she rushed into his embraces, she held him and would
not let him go. Thus you see the jealousy and eagerness of
love produced by either a former loss, or present more than
ordinary want of the object, both which how pertinent they
are to the regenerate man, either observing his past sins, or in-
stant temptations, this discourse hath already made manifest.
The use of this thesis (to wit, that the greatness of one’s
sins makes the regenerate man apply himself more fiercely
to Christ) is first, by way of caution, that we mistake not
SERMON XXX. 643
a motive for an efficient, an impulsive for a principal cause.
For where we say, ‘it makes him apply himself, &c., we
mean not that the increase of sin produces faith formally,
but only inciteth to believe by way of instruction, by shew-
ing us what distress we are in, and consequently in what
a necessity of a deliverer. The meditation of our sinful
courses may disclose our misery, not redress it; may ex-
plore, not mend a sinner, like a touchstone to try, not
any way to alter him. It is the controlling Spirit which
must effectually renew our spirits, and lead us to the Christ
which our sins told us we had need of. The sense of sin
may rouse the soul, but it is the Spirit of God that lays the toils;
the feeling of our guilt may beat the waters, but it is the
great fisher of our souls which spreads the nets, which entraps
us as we are on our way to hell, and leads us captive to salvation.
The mere gripings of our conscience being not produced by
any pharmacon of the Spirit, but by some distemper arising
from sin, what anxiety doth it cause within us! what pangs
and twinges to the soul! O Lord, do Thou regenerate us, and
then Thy Holy Spirit shall sanctify even our sins unto our
good; and if Thy grace may lead us, our sins shall pursue
and drive us unto Christ! Secondly, by way of character,
how to distinguish a true convert from a false. A man
which from an inveterate desperate malady shall meet with a
miraculous unexpected cure, will naturally have some art of
expression above an ordinary joy; you shall see him in an
ecstacy of thanksgiving and exultancy, whilst another, which
was never in that distress, quietly enjoys the same health,
and gives thanks softly by himself to his preserver. So is it
in the distresses of the soul, which if they have been exces-
sive, and almost beyond hope of recovery, as the miracle
must, so will the expression of this deliverance be somewhat
extraordinary. The soul which from a good moral or less
sinful natural estate, is magis immutata quam genita, rather
changed than regenerate into a spiritual, goes through this
business without any great noise, the Spirit entering into it
in a still small voice, or at a breathing: but when a robust- John xx.
ous obdurate sinner shall be rather apprehended than called, 22:
when the sea shall be commanded to give up his ship-
wrecked, and the sepulchre to restore her dead, the soul
Tt 2
{Luke i.
48. ]
[1 Cor. xv.
55—57. |
[2 Pet. 1.
10.]
[ Philipp.
iii. 14. ]
[ Rom. vii.
24.
644 SERMON XXX.
surely which thus escapeth shall not be content with a mean
expression, but will practise all the halleluiahs and magni-
ficats which the triumphant liturgies of the saints can afford
it. Wherefore, I say, if any one, out of a full violent course
of sinning conceive himself converted and regenerated, let him
examine what a degree of spiritual exultancy he hath attained
to, and if he find it but mean, and slight, and perfunctory, let
him somewhat suspect, that he may the more confirm the
evidence of his calling. Now this spiritual exultancy of the
regenerate consists both in a solemn humiliation of himself,
and a spiritual rejoicing in God his Saviour; both expressed
in Mary’s Magnificat, where she specifies in the midst of her
joy “the lowliness of His handmaid,” and in St. Paul’s vic-
tory-song over death. So that if the conversion of an inordi-
nate sinner be not accompanied with unwonted joy and sorrow,
with a godly sense of his past distress, and a godly triumph
for his delivery; if it be not followed with a violent eager-
ness to fasten on Christ; finally, if there be not somewhat
above ordinary in the expression, then I counsel not to dis-
trust, but fear, that is, with a solicitous, not suspicious
trembling, to labour to “make thy calling and election sure :”
to pray to that Holy Spirit to strike our hearts with a mea-
sure of holy joy and holy sorrow, some way proportionable to
the size of those sins, which in our unregeneracy reigned in
us; and for those of us whom our sins have separated far
from Him, but His grace hath called home to Him, that He
will not suffer us to be content with a distance, but draw us
close unto Himself, make us “ press toward the mark,” and
fasten ourselves on that Saviour, which hath redeemed us
from the body and guilt of this so great death. The third.
use is, of comfort and confirmation to some tender souls who
are incorporate into Christ, yet finding not in themselves
that excessive measure of humiliation which they observe in
others, suspect their own state, and infinitely grieve that
they can grieve no more. Whereas this doctrine being ob-
served will be an allay to their sorrow, and wipe some un-
necessary tears from their eyes. For if the greatness of sin
past, or the plentiful rel’cs of sin remaining, do require so
great a measure of sorrow, to expiate the one, and subdue
the other; if it be a deliverance from an habituate servitude
SERMON XXX. 645
to all manner of sin, which provokes this extraordinary pains
of expression; then certainly they who have been brought
up with the Spirit, which were from their baptism never
wholly deprived of it, need not to be bound over to this
trade of sorrow, need not to be set apart to that perpetual
humiliation which a more stubbern sin or devil is wont to be
cast out by. I doubt not but a soul educated in familiarity
with the Spirit, may at once enjoy herself and it; and so that
if it have an humble conceit of itself, and a filial of God,
may in earth possess God with some clearness of look, some
serenity of affections, some alacrity of heart, and tranquillity
of spirit. God delights not in the torment of His children,
(though some are so to be humbled,) yea, He delights not in
such burnt offerings as they bestow upon Him, who destroy,
and consume, and sacrifice themselves; but “‘ the Lord’s de-
light is in them that fear Him” filially, “and put their trust,”
i.e. assurance, confidence, “in His mercy;” in them that re-
joice, that make their service a pleasure, not an affliction,
and thereby possess heaven before they come to it. It is ob-
served in husbandry that soil, laid on hard, barren, starved
ground doth improve it, and at once deface and enrich it,
which yet in ground naturally fruitful, and kept in heart,
and good case, is esteemed unnecessary and burthensome.
You need not the application. Again, the husbandman can
mend a dry, stubborn, wayward, fruitless earth, by over-
flowing of it, and on such indeed is his ordinary requisite
discipline, to punish it for its amendment. But there is a
ground otherwise well tempered, which they call a weeping
ground, whence continually water soaks out, and this proves
seldom fruitful (if our learned husbandmen observe aright),
whereof there is sometime need of draining, as well as water-
ing. The application is that your soul, which either hath
been naturally dry and barren, or else overwrought in the
business of the world, needs a flood of tears to soften and
purge it. But the well-tempered soul, which hath never been
out of heart, but hath always had some inward life, some
fatness of, and nourishment from the Spirit, is rather op-
pressed than improved by such an overflow. The Christian
is thereby much hindered in his progress of good works, and
cannot serve the Lord with alacrity, that so perpetually hangs
{ Psalm
exlvii. 11.]
646 SERMON XXX.
down his head like a bulrush. Wherefore, the country rule
is, that that ground is best which is mellow, which being
crushed will break but not crumble, dissolve, but not exces-
sively. Hence, I say, the habituate believer need not sus-
pect his estate, if he find not in himself such an extremity
of violent grief and humiliation as he observes in others ;
knowing that in him such a measure of tears would both soil
the face of his devotion, and clog the exercise of it. His
best mediocrity will be to be habitually humbled, but actually
lively and alacrious in the ways of godliness; not to be too
rigid and severe a tyrant over his soul, but to keep it in a
temper of Christian softness, tender under the hand of God,
and yet man-like and able both in the performance of God’s
worship and his own calling. And whensoever we shall find
ourselves in either extreme, either too much hardened or too
much melted, too much elevated or too much dejected, then to
pray to that Holy Spirit so to fashion the temper of our souls,
that we neither fail in humbling ourselves in some measure
for our sins, nor yet too cowardly deject and cast down our-
selves, below the courage, and comfort, and spiritual rejoicing
which He hath prescribed us. “Ὁ Holy Lord, we are the
greatest of sinners, and therefore we humble ourselves before
Thee, but Thou hast sent Thy Christ into the world to save
sinners, and therefore we raise up our spirits again, and
praise and magnify Thy Name.”? And thus much of this point,
and in brief, of the first consideration of these words, to wit,
as they are absolutely a profession of Paul himself, to which
end we beheld him in his double estate, converted and un-
converted. In his unconverted state we found, though a
very great sinner, yet not absolutely greater than those times
brought forth, and therefore we were to think of him re-
latively to his future estate, and so we found him the greatest
sinner that ever was called in the New Testament into so
glorious a saint. Whence we observe the rarity of such con-
versions, that though Saul were, yet every blasphemous sinner
could not expect to be called from the depth of sin to rege-
neracy and salvation: and this we proved both against the
ancient Romans and modern censors of morality, and applied
it to the care which we ought to have of keeping our unre-
generacy spotless from any reigning sin. Afterward we came
SERMON XXX. 647
to Paul converted, where we balked the discourse of the con-
dition of sin in the regenerate, and rather observed the effect
of it; and in it, that the greatness of his sin made (as Paul,
so) every regenerate man more eagerly to fasten on Christ.
Which being proved by a double ground, we applied first, by
way of caution, how that proposition was to be understood ;
2. by way of character, how a great sinner may judge of his
sincere certain conversion; 3. by way of comfort to others,
who find not the effects of humiliation and the like in them-
selves, in such measure as they see in others; and so we have
passed through the first consideration of these words, being
conceived absolutely as St. Paul’s profession of himself, we
should come to the other consideration, as they are set down
to us as a pattern or form of confessing the estate, and ap-
plying the salvation of sinners to ourselves, which business
requiring the pains, and being worthy the expense of an en-
tire hour, we must defer to a second exercise.
Now the God which hath created us, hath elected, redeemed,
called, justified us, will sanctify us in His time, will prosper
this His ordinance, will direct us by His grace to His glory.
To Him be ascribed due the honour, the praise, the glory, the
dominion, which through all ages of the world have been
given to Him that sitteth on the throne, to the Holy Spirit,
and Lamb for evermore.
PARS SECUNDA.
SERMON XXXI.
1 Tm. 1. 15.
Of whom I am the chief.
In all human writings and learning, there is a kind of
poverty and emptiness, which makes them when they are
beheld by a judicious reader look starved and crest-fallen :
their speeches are rather puffed up than filled, they have a
kind of boasting and ostentation in them, and promise more
substance and matter to the ear, than they are able to per-
form really to the understanding: whence it falls out, that
we are more affected with them at the first hearing, and, if
the orator be clear in his expression, we understand as much
at the first recital, as we are able to do at the hundredth
repetition. But there is a kind of excellency in the Scrip-
ture, a kind of ὕψος, or sublimity above all other writings in
the world. The reading of every section of it leaves a sting
in the mind, and a perpetual conceit of a still imperfect
understanding of it. An intelligent man at every view finds
in it a fresh mystery, and still perceives that there is some-
what beyond, not yet attained to: like men digging in mines,
the deeper he dives he finds the greatest treasure, and meets
with that under ground, which looking on the outward turf,
or surface, he never imagined to have been there. This I
observe unto you, to shew you the riches both of all, and
especially of this Scripture, whereinto the deeper I dig, the
more ore I find: and having already bestowed one hour in
the discussing of it, without any violence, or wresting, or
wire-drawing, find plenty of new materials.
We have already handled the words at large in one con-
sideration, as they area profession of Paul himself; I will not
repeat you the particular occurrents. We now without any
more delay of preface come to the second consideration of
SERMON XXXI. 64.9
them, as they are spoken by Paul respectively to us, i. e. as
they are prescribed us for a form of confessing the estate, and
applying the salvation of sinners unto ourselves, teaching
each of us for a close of our faith and devotion to confess,
“ Of all,” &c.
Where first, the cadence or manner how Paul falls into
these words, is worthy to be both observed and imitated:
the chief and whole business of this verse being the truth,
the acceptable truth, of Christ’s Incarnation, with the end of
it, the saving of sinners. He can no sooner name this word
sinners, but his exceeding melting tenderness abruptly falls
off, and subsumes, “Of all sinners,” &c. ‘If there be any thing
that concerns sinners, I am sure I have my part in that, for
of that number 1 am the chief” The note by the way briefly
is, that ‘‘a tender conscience never hears of the name of sin-
ner, but straight applies it to itself.” It is noted by Aristotle,
the master of human learning, that that rhetoric was very
thin and unprofitable, very poor and like to do little good
upon men’s affections, which insisted on general matters,
and descended not to particulars, as if one should discourse
of sin in general and sinners, without reference to this or
that particular sin or sinner; and the reason of his note was,
because men are not moved or stirred with this eloquence.
The intemperate person could hear a declamation against
vice, and never be affected with it, unless it stooped to take
notice of his particular enormities; and so is it with other
criminals. This reason of his was grounded upon the obdu-
rateness of men’s hearts, which would think that nothing
concerned them, but what was framed against the individual
offender, all such being as dull and unapt to understand any
thing that being applied might move or prick them, as men
are to take notice of a common national judgment, which
we never duly weigh, till we smart under it in particular.
This senselessness may also seem to have been amongst St.
Paul’s Corinthians, which made him use Aristotle’s counsel
in driving his speech home to their private persons. Where [1 Cor. vi.
telling them that neither fornicators nor idolaters, and the like, ” oe
shall inherit the kingdom of God; for fear they should not
be so tender conscienced as of their own accords to apply
a { Rhetoric., lib. ii. ο. 22.]
ver. 11].
[ Rom. i.
28. ]
[ Ps. exv.
5, 6.]
650 SERMON XXXI.
these sins to themselves, and read themselves guilty in that
glass; he is fain to supply that office, and plainly tell them
what otherwise perhaps they would not have conceived, “ and
such were some of you.’ This senseless hard-heartedness or
backwardness in applying the either commands or threaten-
ings of the law to one’s self, is by the Apostle called, νοῦς
ἀδόκιμος, Which we ordinarily translate a reprobate mind,
but may be brought to signify, a mind without judgment,
that hath no faculty of discerning, that cannot in a general
threatening observe something that may concern the danger
of his particular state: or, as it may be rendered, a mind
without sense, not apprehensive of those things which are
manifestly proposed to them, like those walking idols de-
scribed by the Psalmist, “Eyes have they and see not, ears and
hear not, noses and smell not,” only beautiful carcasses of
Christians, which have nothing but their shape and motion
to persuade you that they live: unless we add this most
unhappy symptom, which indicates a state more wretched far
than death itself, that there is strength and vigour to oppose
recovery, that amidst death there yet survives a hatred and
antipathy to life. In such a soul as this there is a perpetual
reaction, and impatience of the presence of any thing which
may trash, encumber, or oppress it: a judgment or denuncia-
tion is but cast away upon it, it shall be sure to return un-
profitably, and neither move nor mend it. This hath been,
and much more might be observed to you, of the carriage of
the hard, stupid heart toward either Scripture or preacher,
to the plain opening of this point ; for you shall more clearly
understand the tender heart by observing the obdurate,
and learn to be affected aright with God’s law or punish-
ents, by knowing and hating the opposite stubborn sense-
lessness. Now in brief, this tender heart in the discovery of
a sin, or denunciation of a judgment needs not a particular,
“Thou art the man,” to bring it home to his person. The more
wide and general the proposal is, the more directly and
effectually is this strucken with it. In a common satire, or
declamation against sin in general, it hath a sudden art of
logic to anatomize and branch this sin in general into all
its parts; and then to lay each of them to its own charge;
it hath a skill of making every passage in the Scripture a
SERMON XXXI. 651
glass to espy some of her deformities in, and cannot so much
as mention that ordinary name of sin or sinner, without an
extraordinary affection, and unrequired accusation of itself,
“Of all sinners,” &c. The plain reason of this effect in the
tender heart is, first, because it is tender. The soft and accurate
parts of a man’s body do suffer without reaction, i. e. do yield
at the appearance of an enemy, and not any way put forward
to repel him. These being fixed on by a bee, or the like, are
easily penetrated by the sting, and are so far from resisting
of it, that they do in ἃ manner draw it to them, and by their
free reception allure it to enter so far, that the owner can
seldom ever recover it back again. Whereas on a dead car-
cass, a thick or callous member of the body, a bee may fix
and not forfeit her sting. So doth a tender heart never
resist or defend itself against a stroke, but attenuates itself,
lays wide open its pores, to facilitate its entrance, seems to
woo a threatening, to prick, and sting, and wound it sharply,
as if it rejoiced in, and did even court those torments which
the sense of sin or judgment thus produced.
Again, a tender heart ordinarily meets with more blows,
more oppressions than any other: its very passiveness pro-
vokes every one’s malice; the fly and dust, as if it were by a
kind of natural instinct, drive directly at the eye, and no
member about you shall be oftener rubbed or disordered
than that which is raw or distempered; the reason being,
because that which is not worthy notice to another part is an
affliction to this, and a mote which the hand observes not,
will torment the eye. So is it with the conscience, whose
tenderness doth tempt every piece of Scripture to afflict it,
and is more encumbered with the least atom of sin or threat,
than the more hardened sinner is with a beam or mountain.
Thirdly, one that hath any solemn business to do will not
pass by any opportunity of means which may advantage him
in it. One that hath a search to make will not slip any
evidence which may concur to the helping of his discovery ;
one that hath any treatise to write will be ready to apply
any thing that ever he reads to his theme or purpose. Now
the search, the discourse, the whole employment of a tender
heart is the enquiry after the multitude of its sins, and in
sum, the aggravation of each particular guilt, in and against
Mat. xi. 26.
652 SERMON XXXI.
itself, that so having sufficiently loaded itself, and being tired
with the weight and burden of its sins, it may in some
measure perform the condition which Christ requires of them
which come to Him, and be prepared to receive that ease
which Christ hath promised to the “ weary and heavy laden.”
So then if the tender conscience doth never repel, or rever-
berate any mention of sin, but doth draw out the sting of
it to its length, if it be much affected with the least atom of
sin, and therefore meets with frequent disorders, if, lastly, it
make its employment to gather out of all the Scripture, those
places which may advantage her in the sight and sense of her
sins; then certainly doth she never hear of the name of
sinner, but straight she applies it to herself, which was the
point we undertook to shew.
The direct use of this proposition is for a κρίσις, or
judgment of our estate. It is observed in the body that
the rest of the senses may be distempered and lost with-
out impairing of it, but only the touch cannot, which there-
fore they call the sense of life, because that part or body
which is deprived of feeling, is also at death’s door, and
hath no more life in it, than it hath relics of this sense.
So is it also in spiritual matters: of all other symptoms this
of senselessness is most dangerous, and as the Greek physi-
cians are wont to say of a desperate disease, ὀλέθριον κάρτα
λίαν, “very very mortal.” This feeling tenderness is necessary
to the life of grace, and is an inseparable both effect and
argument of it. Wherefore, I say, for the judgment of your-
selves, observe how every piece of Scripture works upon you.
If you can pass over a catalogue of sins and judgments without
any regret, or reluctancy, if you can read Sodom and Gomor-
rah, Babylon and the harlot Jerusalem, and not be affected
with their stories, if thou canst be the auditor of other men’s
faults without any sense or griping of thine own, if the name of
sin or sinner be unto thee but as a jest or fable, not worthy
thy serious notice, then fear thy affections’ want of that tem-
per, which the softening Spirit is wont to bestow where it
rests, and accordingly as thou findest this tenderness increas-
ing or waning in thee, either give thanks or pray: either
give thanks for the plenty of that Spirit which thou enjoyest, or
in the sense of thy wants importune it, that God will give us
SERMON XXXI. 653
softened relenting hearts, that the recital of other men’s
sins may move us, other men’s judgments may strike us,
other men’s repentance melt us with a sense, with a confes-
sion, with a contrition of our own. But above all, O Holy
Spirit, from hardness of heart, from an undiscerning, repro-
bate spirit, from a contempt, nay neglect, a not observing of
Thy Word, as from the danger of hell, Good Lord deliver us.
And thus much of this point, of this effect of a tender
heart, noted to you out of the cadence of the words. I now
come to observe somewhat more real out of the main of the
words themselves, “Of whom,” ἕο. We find not our Apostle
here complimenting with himself, either excusing or attenu-
ating his guilt, but as it were glorying in the measure of his
sins, striving for pre-eminence above all other sinners, chal-
lenging it as his right, and as eager upon the preferment, as his
fellow-labourer Peter’s successor for a primacy (as he pro-
fesses) of all bishops, yea the whole Church; so our Apostle
here, “ Of all sinners I am the chief.” The note briefly is this,
that every one is to aggravate the measure and number of his
sins against himself, and as near as he can observe how his
guilt exceedeth other men’s. This was St. Paul’s practice
and our pattern, not to be gazed on, but followed, not to be
discussed, but imitated. In the discourse whereof I shall not
labour to prove you the necessity of this practice, which yet
I might do out of David’s example in his penitential psalms, [Ps. li. ;
especially the fifty-first, out of Nehemiah’s confession, and the ΟΣ
like, but taking this as supposed, I shall rather mix doctrine,
and reason, and use altogether, in prescribing some forms of
aggravating ourselves to ourselves, yet not descending to a par-
ticular dissection of sin into all its parts, but dealing only on
general heads, equally applicable to all men, briefly reducible
to these two, 1. original sin, or the sin of our nature, of which
we are all equally guilty; 2. personal sin, grounded in and
terminated to each man’s person.
For original sin, it is the fathers’ complaint, and ought
more justly to be ours of these times, that there is no
reckoning made of it, it is seldom thought worthy to
supply a serious place in our humiliation, it is mentioned
only for fashion’s sake, and as it were to stop God’s
mouth, and to give Him satisfaction, or palliate the guilt
654 SERMON XXXI.
of our wilful rebellions, not on any real apprehension that
its cure and remedy in baptism is a considerable benefit,
or the remnant weakness (after the killing venom is abated)
were more than a trivial disadvantage. So that we have a
kind of need of original clearness of understanding, to judge
of the foulness of original sin, and we cannot sufficiently con-
ceive our loss, without some recovery of those very faculties we
forfeited in it. But that we may not be wilfully blind in a
matter that so imports us, that we may understand somewhat
of the nature and dangerous condition of this sin, you must
conceive Adam, who committed this first sin, in a double
respect, either as one particular man, or as containing in his
loins the whole nature of man, all mankind, which should ever
come from him. Adam’s particular sin,i. e. his personal disobe-
dience is wonderfully aggravated from the fathers”, 1. from his
original justice, which God had bestowed on him; 2. from the
near familiarity with God, which he enjoyed and then lost; ὃ.
from the perpetual blessed estate, which, had it not been for
this disobedience, he might for ever have lived in; 4. from the
purity and integrity of his will, which was then void of all
sinful desire, which otherwise might have tempted to this
disobedience; 5. from the easiness of both remembering and
observing the commandment, it being a short prohibition,
and only to abstam from one tree, where there was such
plenty besides; 6. from the nature and circumstances of the
offence, by which the fathers* do refer it to all manner of
heinous sins, making it to contain a breach of almost each
moral law, all which were then written in the tables of his
heart, and therefore concluding it to be an aggregate or
mixture of all those sins which we have since so reiterated,
and so many times sinned over. So then this personal sin of
Adam was of no mean size, not to be reckoned of as an every
day’s offence, as an ordinary breach, or the mere eating of an
apple. In the next place, as Adam was no private person,
but the whole human nature, so this sin is to be considered
either in'the root, or in the fruit, in itself, or in its effects.
In itself; so all mankind, and every particular man is, and in
that name must humble himself as concerned in the eating
» S. August. De Civit. Dei, xxi. 12. © Thid., lib. xiv. ο. 12.
4 S. Leo Magn., p. 143. [See above, p. 289. ]
SERMON XXXI. 655
of that fruit, which only Adam’s teeth did fasten on; is to
deem himself bound to be humbled for that pride, that curi-
| osity, that disobedience, or whatsoever sin else can be con-
tained in that first great transgression; and count you this
nothing, to have a share in such a sin which contains such a
multitude of rebellions? It is not a slight, perfunctory humi-
liation that can expiate, not a small labour that can destroy
this monster which is so rich in heads, each to be cut off by
the work of a several repentance. Now in the last place, as
this sin of all mankind in Adam is considered in its effects,
so it becomes to us a “ body of sin and death,” a natural dis-
order of the whole man, an hostility and enmity of the flesh
against the spirit, and the parent of all sin in us, as may
appear, Rom. vii. and Jam. i. 14. Which that you may have
a more complete understanding of, consider it as it is ordi-
narily set down, consisting of three parts, 1. a natural defect,
2. a moral affection, 3. a legal guilt; i.e. a guiltiness of
the breach of the law, for these three (whatsoever you may
think of them) are all parts of that sin of our nature, which
is in, and is to be imputed to us, called ordinarily original
sin in us, to distinguish it from that first act committed by
Adam, of which this is an effect. And first, that natural
defect is a total loss and privation of that primitive justice,
holiness and obedience, which God had furnished the creature
withal ; a disorder of all the powers of the soul, a darkness of
the understanding, a perverseness of the will, a debility, weak-
ness, and decay of all the senses, and in sum, a poverty and
destruction, and almost a nothingness of all the powers of
Soul and body. And how ought we to lament this loss with
all the veins of our heart! to labour for some new strain of
expressing our sorrow, and in fine to petition that rich grace,
which may build up all these ruins; to pray to God that His
Christ may purchase and bestow on us new abilities, that
the second Adam may furnish us with more durable powers
and lasting graces than we had, but forfeited in the first !
The following part of this sin of our nature, viz., a moral evil
affection, is word for word mentioned Rom. vii.5; for there [Rom. vii.
the Greek words παθήματα ἁμαρτιῶν, ordinarily translated J
“motions of sins,” and in the margin ‘ the passions of sins,” are
more significantly to be rendered “ affections of sins,” i. 6. by
James i.
14.
656 SERMON XXXI.
an usual figure, sinful affections. That you may the better
observe the encumbrances of this branch of this sin, which
doth so overshadow the whole man, and so fence him from
the beams and light of the spiritual invisible Sun, I am to
tell you that the very heathen that lived without the know-
ledge of God, had no conversation with, and so no instruction
from the Bible in this matter; that these very heathens, I say,
had a sense of this part of original sin, to wit, of these evil
moral lusts and affections, which they felt in themselves,
though they knew not whence they sprang. Hence it is
that a Greek philosopher® out of the ancients makes a large
discourse of the unsatiable desire and lust which is in every
man, and renders his life grievous unto him, where he useth
the very same word, though with a significant epithet added to
it, that St. James doth, ch. 1. ver. 14. ἀπέραντος ἐπιθυμία, “in-
finite lust,” with which, as St. James saith, “a man is drawn
away and enticed,” ἐξελκόμενος καὶ δελεαζόμενος, 80, saith he,
that part of the mind in which these lusts dwell, is persuaded
and drawn, or rather falls backward and forward, ἄνω καὶ
κάτω μεταπίπτει Kal ἀναπείθεται, which lust or evil concu-
piscence he at last defines to be’, ἀκολασία τῷ τετριμμένῳ
πίθῳ διὰ THY ἀπληστίαν ἀπεικασμένη, “an unsatiable intem-
perance of the appetite, never filled with a desire,’ never
ceasing in the prosecution of evil; and again he calls it, πε-
ριπεφυκυίαν ἡμῖν ἔξωθεν yéveows, “our birth and nativity
derived to us by our parents,” i. e. an evil affection heredi-
tary to us, and delivered to us as a legacy at our birth and na-
tivity: all which seemsa clear expression of that original lust,
whose motions they felt, and guessed at its nature. Hence is
it, that it was a custom among all of them, I mean the com-
mon heathen, to use many ways of purgations, especially on
their children, who at the imposition of their names were to
be lustrated and purified, with a great deal of superstition and
ceremony, such like as they used to drive away a plague, or
a cure for an house or city. As if nature by instinct had
taught them so much religion, as to acknowledge and desire
to cure in every one this hereditary disease of the soul, this
“ plague of man’s heart,” as it is called 1 Kings viii. 38. And
© Jamblichus, Protrept., ο. xvii. p. 101. ‘ Ibid., p. 102.
® (Id. Explan. Symb., iii.] p. 136,
. SERMON XXXI. 657
in sum, the whole learning of the wisest of them, (such were
the moralists,) was directed to the governing and keeping in
order of these evil affections, which they called the unruly
citizens" and common people of the soul, whose intemperance
and disorders they plainly observed within themselves, and
jaboured hard to purge out, or subdue to the government of
reason and virtue, which two we more fully enjoy, and more
christianly call the power of grace, redeeming our souls
from this body of sin. Thus have I briefly shewed you the
sense that the very heathen had of this second branch of
original sin, which needs therefore no farther aggravation to
you but this, that they who had neither Spirit nor Scripture to
instruct them, did naturally so feelingly observe and curse it,
that by reason of it they esteemed their whole life but a
living death’, τίς οἶδεν εἰ τὸ ζῆν μέν ἐστι κατθανεῖν, τὸ κατ-
θανεῖν δὲ ζῆν ; and their body but the sepulchre of the soul,
τὸ σῶμα ἐστὶν ἡμῶν σῆμα, καὶ yap ἡμεῖς τῷ ὄντι τέθναμεν,
both which together are but a periphrasis of that which St.
Paul calls in brief the ‘body of death.” And shall we who (Rom. vii.
have obtained plenty of light and instruction, besides that ?*1
which nature bestowed on us with them, shall we, I say, let
our eyes be confounded with abundance of day? shall we see
it more clearly to take less notice of it? shall we feel the
stings of sin within us, (which though they do but prick the
regenerate, prove mortal to the rest of us,) and shall we not
observe them? Shall we not rather weep those fountains dry,
and crop this luxury of our affections with a severe sharp
sorrow and humiliation? Shall we not starve this rank,
fruitful mother of vipers, by denying it all nourishment from
without, all advantages of temptations and the like, which it
is wont to make use of to beget in us all manner of sin: let
us aggravate every circumstance and inconvenience of it to
ourselves, and then endeavour to banish it out of us, and
when we find we are not able, importune that strong assistant
the Holy Spirit to curb and subdue it, that in the necessity
of residing, it yet may not reign in our mortal bodies; to
tame and abate the power of this necessary Amorite, and free
us from the activity, and mischief and temptations of it here,
and from the punishment and imputation of it hereafter.
Maximus Tyrius, [supr. p. 278.] i Euripides, Polyidus, frag. 7. ed. Dind,
NAMMOND, U τι
IPS wlieon
James i.
15.
[Ps. Ixxiv.
4.
[ Rom. vii.
23.]
658 SERMON ΧΧΧΙ. *
And so I come to the third part or branch of this original
sin, to wit, its legal guilt, and this we do contract by such an
early prepossession, that it outruns all other computations of
our life. We carry a body of sin about us, before we have
one of flesh, have a decrepit, weak old man, with all his crazy
train of affections and lusts, before even infancy begins. ‘“ Be-
hold,” saith the Psalmist, “I was shapen in iniquity, and in
sin did my mother conceive me:” as if guilt were the plastic
power that formed us, and wickedness the minera and ele-
ment of our being, as if it were that little moving point which
the curious enquirers into nature find to be the rudiment of
animation, and pants not then for life, brt lust, and endless
death. So that the saying of St. James, chap. 1. 15, seems a
description of our natural birth, “ when lust hath conceived, it
bringeth forth sin, and sin when it is finished, bringeth forth
death.” Nor does this hasty inmate leave us when grown up :
no, it improves its rancour against God and goodness, mixes
with custom, passion, and example, and whatever thing is apt
to lead us unto mischief, fomenting all the wild desires of
our inferior brutal part, till it become at last an equal and
professed enemy, making open hostility, setting up its sconces,
fortifying itself with munition and defence, as meaning to
try the quarrel with God, and pretending right to man, whom
God doth but usurp. Thus shall you see it encamped, and
setting up its ‘“ banners for tokens,” under that proud name
of another law. “I see another law in my members, warring
against the law of my mind,” and as if it had got the better
of the day, “ bringing me into captivity to the law of sin, which
is in the members,” i. e. unto itself. And shall we feel such
an enemy within us, laying siege at God and grace in us,
and fiercely resolving, whether by deceit or battery to capti-
vate us unto himself, and shall we not take notice of him?
Shall we not think it worthy our pains and expense to defeat
him, or secure ourselves? Beloved, that will be the best
stratagem for the taking of this enemy, which is now-a-days
most ordinary in sieges, to block up all passages, and hinder
all access of fresh provision, and so by denying this greedy
devourer all nourishment from without, to starve and pine
him into such a tameness, that he may be taken without re-
sistance; which how really you may perform by these means
4 SHRMON ΧΧΧΙ. 659
of mortification and repentance prescribed you in Scripture,
you shall better learn by your own practice than my discourse.
The fourth aggravation of this guilt is, that its minera
and fuel lurks even in a regenerate man, wretched, &c., and
enforceth Paul into a conflict, a war against himself. And 1 Cor. ix.
is it possible for one otherwise happy, (as the regenerate ae
man inwardly surely is,) to sleep securely, and never to try a
field with the author of its so much misery, or finding it to
be within itself part of itself, not to think it a sin worthy re-
pentance, and sorrow, by which God’s Holy Spirit is so re-
sisted, so affronted, and almost quelled and cast out?
Fifthly, and lastly, the guilt of it appears by the effects of it,
1. inclination, 2. consent to evil: for even every inclination to
sin without consent is an irregularity and kind of sin, i. e. an
aversion of some of our faculties from God; all which should
directly drive amam to Him and goodness. That servant
which is commanded with all speed and earnestness to go
about any thing, offends against his master’s precept if he
any way incline to disobedience, if he perform his commands
with any regret or reluctancy. Now secondly, consent is so
natural a consequent of this evil inclination, that in a man
you can scarce discern, much less sever them. No man hath
any inordinate lust, but doth give some kind of consent to it,
the whole will being so infected with this lust, that that can no
sooner bring forth evil motions, but this will be ready at hand
with evil desires: and then how evident a guilt, how plain a
breach of the law it is you need not mine eyes to teach you.
Thus have I insisted somewhat largely on the branches of
original sin, which I have spread and stretched the wider,
that I might furnish you with more variety of aggravations
on each member of it, which I think may be of important
use, for this or any other popular auditory, because this sin
ordinarily is so little thought of, even in our solemnest humi-
lations. When you profess that you are about the business
of repentance, you cannot be persuaded that this common
sin which Adam, as you reckon, only sinned, hath any effect
on you. I am yet afraid that you still hardly believe that
you are truly, and in earnest to be sorry for it, unless the
Lord strike our hearts with an exact sense, and professed feel-
ing of this sin of our nature, and corruption of our kind.
[ Eph. iv.
19.]
1 Kings
viii. 37, &c.
660 SERMON XXXI. -
And suffer us not, Ὁ Lord, to nourish in ourselves such a
torpor, sluggishness and security, lest it drive us headlong to
all manner of hard-heartedness to commit actual sins, and
that even with greediness.
And so I come briefly to a view of each man’s personal
sins, “ I am the chief :” where I might rank all manner of sins
into some forms or seats, and then urge the deformity of ©
each of them single and naked to your view, but I will for
the present presume your understandings sufficiently im-
structed in the heinousness of each sin forbidden by the
commandments. For others who will make more or less
sins than the Scripture doth, I come not to satisfy them, or
decide their cases of conscience. In brief I will propose to
your practice only two forms of confessing your sins, and
humbling yourselves for them, which I desire you to aggra-
vate to yourselves, because I have not now the leisure to beat
them low, or deep to your consciences. Besides original sin
already spoken of, you are to lay hard to your own charges,
1. your particular chief sins, 2. all your ordmary sms in
gross. For the first, observe but that one admirable place
in Solomon’s prayer at the dedication of the Temple. “If
there be in the land famine,” &c. ‘ Whatsoever plague,
whatsoever sickness, what prayer or supplication soever be
made by any man, or by all Thy people Israel, which shall
know every man the plague of his own heart, and spread
forth his hand to this house, then hear Thou in heaven,” &e.
Where the condition of obtaining their requests from God is
excellently set down, “if they shall know,” 1. e. be sensible of,
be sorry for, and confess to God every man the “ plague of his
own heart,” that is, m the bulk and heap of their sins, shall
pick the fairest loveliest sin in the pack, the plague, 1. e. the
pestilential, reigning, sweeping offence, on which all the lower
train of petty faults do wait and depend, do minister and
suppeditate matter to work. If, I say, they shall take this
captain sin, and anatomize, and cut up, and discover
every branch of him without any fraud or concealment
before the Lord, and then sacrifice that dear darling, and
with it their whole fleshly lust as an holocaust, or whole
burnt-offering before the Lord: then will He “hear from
heaven His dwelling-place, and when He heareth, forgive,”
SERMON XXXI. 661
even their other concealed sins, because they have disclosed
so entirely, and parted so freely from that. For there is in
every of us one master sin that rules the rabble, one fatling
which is fed with the choicest of our provision, one captain of
the devil’s troop, one “the plague” in every man’s heart. This
being sincerely confessed and displayed, and washed in a full
stream of tears, for the lower more ordinary sort, for the
heap or bulk, we must use David’s penitential compendious Ps, xix.
art, who overcome with the multitude of his sins to be re- !*
peated, folds them all in this prayer, ‘‘ Who can tell how oft
he offendeth?” &e. ‘* And do Thou, O Lord, work in us the
sincere acknowledgment of, and contrition for both them,
and the whole bundle of our unknown every day’s transgres-
sions, and having purged out of us those more forward,
known, notorious enormities, cleanse us also from our secret
faults.” And thus much be spoken of this proposition, that,
and how every man is to aggravate the measure and number
of his sins against himself. The whole doctrine is, and in
our whole discourse hath been handled for a store of uses;
for in setting down how you are to aggravate your sins,
especially your original sin against yourselves, I have spoken
all the while to your affections, and will therefore presume
that you have already laid them up in your hearts to that
purpose. Only take one pertinent use for a close, which hath
not been touched in the former discourse. If every one be
to aggravate his own sins, and to reckon himself “of all sinners
the chief;” then must no man usurp the privilege to see or
censure other men’s sins through a multiplying glass, 1. e.
double to what indeed they are, as most men do now-a-days.
What so frequent among those who are most negligent of
their own ways, as to be most severe inquisitors of other
men’s? and to spy, and censure, and damn a mote or atom
in another man’s eye, when their own is in danger to be put
out by a beam? Hence is it that among laymen the sins of
clergy are weighed according to the measure of the sanc-
tuary, which was provided for the paying of their tithesk, Lev. xxvii.
i.e. double the ordinary balance; and their own, if not 7”
under, at most according to the common weight of the con-
gregation. In a minister every error shall become an heresy,
« Hooker, p.428. [Book ν. ch. 79. § 10. ed. Keble. ]
662 SERMON XXXI.
every slip a crime, and every crime a sacrilege, whereas,
beloved, he that means to take out St. Paul’s lesson, must
extenuate every man’s sins but his own, or else his heart will
give his tongue the lie, when it hears him say, “ Of all,” &c.
And so much of this doctrine of aggravating our sins to
ourselves, which we are to perform in our daily audit betwixt
us and our own consciences. There is another seasonable
observation behind in a word to be handled; this particle ὧν,
“of whom,” hath a double relation, either to sinners simply,
and so it hath been handled already, or to sinners as they
are here set down, to wit, those sinners which Christ came
into the world to save: and so St. Paul here is changed from
the chief of sinners to the chief of saimts, and then the doc-
trine is become a doctrine of comfort fit for a conclusion, that
he who can follow Paul’s example and precept, can suffi-
ciently humble himself for his sins, accept that faithful say-
ing, and rightly lay hold on Christ, may assure himself that
he is become a chief saint, for so could Paul say, “Of all
sinners I am the chief,” and therefore of all those sinners that
Christ came into the world to save, πρῶτος εἰμὶ, “I am the
chief too.” I shall not discuss this point at large, as being
too wide to be comprehended in so poor a pittance of time,
but shew the condition of it briefly. He that by God’s in-
ward effectual working is come to a clear sight and accurate
feeling of his sims; that hath not spared any one minute [of]
circumstance for the discovery of them, not one point of
aggravation for the humbling of himself, he that bemg thus
prepared for his journey to Christ with his burden on his
back, shall then take his flight and keep upon the wing, till
he fix firmly on Him, may be as sure that he shall die the
death, and reign the life of a saint, as he is resolved that
God is faithful m His promises: then’ may he live with
this syllogism of confidence, not presumption, in his mouth,
“it is a faithful saying that Christ came into the world” to
justify, sanctify, and “save believing humble sinners ;” but
I find myself an humble and believing, and consequently, a
justified, sanctified sinner, therefore it is as certain a truth,
[Rom viii. that I shall be saved. And thus you see Paul’s, “I am the
58: chief,” interpreted by that assured persuasion, “that neither
death nor life, nor any creature shall be able to separate him,”
SERMON XXXI. 663
&e. I will not discuss the nature of this assurance, whether
it be an act of faith or hope, only thus much, it seems to be
derived or bestowed upon hope by faith, an expectation of
the performances of the promises grounded upon a firm faith
in them, and so to be either an eminent degree of faith, or
a confirmed hope. The use of this point is, not to be content
with this bare assurance, but to labour to confirm it to us by
those effects which do ordinarily and naturally spring from
it. Such are, first, joy, or glorying, mentioned Heb. iii. 6; Heb. iii. 6.
the confidence and “ rejoicing of your hope firm unto the end:”
secondly, a delight in God, mentioned 1 Pet.i. 3,6; “alively 1 Pet.i.
hope,” &c., wherein ἀγαλλιᾶσθε, “ you exult,” you greatly Ὁ
rejoice and are delighted: thirdly, a patient adhering to God
in a firm expectation ofthis state, even in the midst of all
manner of worldly evils, mentioned Isaiah vin. 17; “I will τ viii.
wait upon the Lord which hideth His face, and I will look for |!
Him,” i. e., I will wait His leisure patiently, for I am sure
He will uncover His face. And Job more plainly and vehe- [et xiii.
mently, “ Though He kill me, yet will I trust in Him.” So ver- ate πὶ
batim, Rom. viii. 25, then “ do we in patience wait for it,” and 26.
2 Thess. ii. 5, “ the patient waiting for Christ.” Fourthly, as ? aun
an effect of ee patience, a silence and acquiescence “in the
will of God,” without any desire of hastening or altering any
effect of it. So Psalm xxxvii. 7; “ Restin the Lord,” where Ps. xxxvii.
the Hebrew hath it, be silent to the Lord, “ and wait patiently 7-517
for Him,” 1. 6. as the consequence interprets it, quarrel not
with God for any thing that happens according to His will,
but against thine, as the prosperity of the wicked, and the
like. Fifthly, a confirmation of the mind, as making our
hope “the anchor of our soul, sure and stedfast,” that we may Heb. vi.
thereby in “ patience possess our souls.” And lastly, a desire of ἘΌΝ ἘΣ
sanctifying ourselves, according tothat 1 John ii. 3; “ Every 19.
man that hath this hope in him purifies himself, even as 1 John
Christ is pure.” These six effects briefly set down, may be ie
certain marks to you, by which you may judge how just
grounds your assurance stands on, and whereby it is to be
distinguished from presumption. O Lord, let the fulness
of Thy Holy Spirit overshadow us, and increase our weaker
faith into a richer measure of assurance, and our more fear-
ful hopes into a degree of full persuasion and certain expec-
664 SERMON XXXI.
tation of those visions that Thou shalt reveal, and that blest
estate that Thou shalt bestow upon us; and lest our confidence
may either be or seem but a presumption, work in us those
effects of patience, of silence, of joy, of delight, of confirma-
tion of mind, and above all a desire and ability of sanctifying
our lives unto Thee.
Thus have I with all possible haste made an end of these
words, and at this time out of the cadence of them observed
to you the tenderness of St. Paul and every regenerate man,
at the least mention of a sin or sinner, illustrated by the op-
posite hardness of heart, proved of soft tender parts of our
body, and made use of for a crisis or judgment of our estate
and livelihood in grace. Secondly, out of the words themselves
we observed the necessity and method of aggravating our
sins, especially original sin, against ourselves, which we made
use of against those that are more quick-sighted in other
men’s estates and guilts than their own. Thirdly, we closed
all with that comfortable doctrine of assurance, discussed to
you in brief with six effects of it proposed for an example to
your care and imitation.
Now the God which hath created us, redeemed, called,
justified us, will sanctify in His time, will prosper this His
ordinance to that end, will direct us by His grace to His
glory. To Him be ascribed due the honour, the praise, the
glory, the dominion, which through all ages of the world have
been given to Him that sitteth on the throne, to the Holy
Spirit, and to the Lamb for evermore.
OXFORD: PRINTED BY I. SHRIMPTON,
= ie 7
1 1012 010 6
85 652
"
ΕΞ
᾿
; Al. i ar >
a ries
i. ie
ΝΥ
is ἢ Ψ᾿
ἘΝ ᾿
7
μὰ
ot Ss
ah em sea
a
joe ΤΩΣ
og “Shue oun ums