Full text of "Transactions of the City of London Entomological & Natural History Society."

See other formats

<5? /

ditn of Caution (fintamologial &■ |l;itunil

HIS SOCIETY was founded in 1858 under the title of the

X “ Haggerston Entomological Society,” and has striven, for
nearly half a century, to diffuse the knowledge of Natural History,
particularly of Entomology. It has taken an active part in the
preservation of Epping Forest and other similar movements for the
public good, and also in the suitable housing of the famous “ Double¬
day Collection ” of Lepidoptera. Its own particular work includes
the reading of papers, discussions, and exhibitions, and a special
feature of recent years has been the compilation of a London Fauna
List, now being published in the Transactions.

The meetings are held on the first and third Tuesdays in each
month, from 7.80 to 10 p.m., at the London Institution, Finsbury
Circus, E.C., which is easily accessible from all parts ; the Meeting-
room is exceptionally comfortable and well lighted, and no effort is
spared to make the evenings pleasant and profitable. An annual
Summer Excursion is arranged by the Society, and occasional Con¬
versazioni. Visitors are welcomed to all the meetings.

There is a good library, containing, amongst other works, the
“ Zoologist,” “ Entomologist ” “ Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine,”
Ac., from their commencement, and also reference collections of
Lepidoptera and Coleoptera, to which it is hoped other Orders may be
added from time to time.

The entrance Fee is Two Shillings and Sixpence, and the Annual
Subscription Seven Shillings and Sixpence, payable in advance, both
being purposely kept low in order that all may avail themeselves of the
benefits the Society offers. The Society therefore looks with con¬
fidence for the support of all who are interested in the study of
Natural History.

The year commences on the first Tuesday in December, but
intending members may join at any time.

Further information may be obtained from either of the lion.
Secretaries.

£ 8 APR. 1903

CITY OF LONDON

Entomological & Natural History

SOCIETY,

Established 18S8.

MEETINGS HELD AT

ondon Institution

FINSBURY CIRCUS, E.C.,

On the 1st and 3rd Tuesdays in each Month.

Council for the Year 1903.

President

A. W. Her a.

T. A. Chapman, Dr., f.z.s., f.e.s.

Vice-Presidents ..

J. A. Clark, f.e.s., m.p.s.

Frederick J. Hanbury, f.l.s., f.e.s.

L. B. Prout, f.e.s.

T rustees

. .

James Scott Sequeira, m.r.c.s.

T. Huckett.

C. Nicholson, f.e.s.

T reasurer

“

35, The Avenue, Hale End,

Chingfoicl, N.E.

Librarians

( G. H. Heath.

1 V. Eric Shaw.

Curators

i W. Ilston Cox.

{ H. A. Sauze.

Reporting

r W. J. Kaye, f.e.s.

“ Caracas,” Ditton Hill, Surbiton.

Hon. Secretaries..

S. J. Bell,

Corresponding

“ St. Aubins,” Sternhold Avenue,

, Streatham Hill, S.W.

AND

Rev.

C. R. N. Burrows

, A. Bacot, f.e.s., C. P. Pickett, f.e.s.,

A. SlCH, F.

E.S., AND J. W. 1’UTT, F.E.S.

transactions

OF THF.

City of London Entomological

AND

Natural History

PART XII.

(1902.)

WITH LIST OF MEMBERS.

Society.

THE SOCIETY’S ROOMS, LONDON INSTITUTION,
FINSBURY CIRCUS, E.C.

February, 1008.

LIST OF MEMBERS.

Adkix, R., f.e.s., 4. Lingard’s Road, Lewisham, S.E.

Bacot, A., f.e.s., 154, Lower Clapton Road, Clapton, N.E.

Bayxk, A. F., Gerencia, Ferro Carril del Sud, Buenos Ayres,
lieu., S. J., “St. Aubins,” Sternhold Avenue, Streatham, S.W.
Bloomfield, W., 94, Mildmay Grove, Mildway Park, N.

Bocskell, F., f.e.s., f.r.h.s., Market Bosworth, Nuneaton.

Brady, Jas., 4, Ham Park Road, Stratford, E.

Briggs, C. A., f.e.s., Rock House, Lymnouth, North Devon.

Broome, E. G., Hurst Vicarage, Twyford, Berks,

Brown, H. Rowland, ji.a., f.e.s., Oxley Grove, Harrow Weald.

Burrows, Rev. C. It. N.. The Vicarage, Mucking, Stanford-le-hope, Essex.
Chapman, Dr. T. A., f.e.s., “Betula,” Reigate, Surrey.

Clark, J. A., f.e.s., m.p.s., 57, Weston Park, Crouch End, N.

Conquest, G. H.. 5k, Hatherley Road, Hoe Street, Walthamstow, N.E.
Cox, W. Ii.ston, “ Zelia,” Duhvich Rise, S.E.

Crabtree, B. H., f.e.s., “The Acacias,” Levenshnlme, Manchester.

Dadd, E. M., f.e.s., 3, Colina Villas, Green Lanes, Wood Green, N.

Dadd, W. B., 3. Colina Villas, Green Lanes, Wood Green, N.

Dale, Sydney W., 44, Coolhurst Road, Crouch End, N.

Dodd, W. R., Oakdene, Bush Hill Park, Endfield.

Edwards. S., f.l.s., f.z.s., f.e.s., Kidbrooke Lodge, Blackheath, S.E.
Fisher, A. H., “ Addington,” Thyra Grove, North Finchley, N.

Fuller, H. A., 13, Lyndhurst Road, Peckhani, S.E.

Gardner, -I. E., 204, Evering Road, Clapton, N.E.

Garland, G. R., 94, Sedgwick Road Leyton, N.E.

Grosvenor, Thos. H. L., Boundary House, Hadley, Middlesex.

II am ling . T. H., 7. Hornsey Rise, N.

Hanbury, Frederick .1., f.e.s., f.e.s., 96, Clapton Common, N.E.
Heasler, II.. 55, Henslowe Road, East Dulwich, S.E.

Heath, G. H., 277, Brockley Road, S.E.

Hkwett, R. W. T. C., Alcombe, Dunster, Somerset.

Hill, H. Ainslir, 9, Addison Mansions, Kensington, W.

Hopson, Montagu F., f.e.s., 16, Rosslyn Hill, Hampstead, N. W.
Huckett, T., 200, New North Road, Islington, N.

Jackson, W., 5J, St. John’s Lane, Clerkenwell, E.C.

James, Russell E., 18, Onslow Gardens, Highgate, N.

Kaye, W. J., f.e.s., Caracas, Difton Hill, Surbiton.

Massey, Herbert, f.e.s., Ivy Lea, Burnage, Didsbury.

May, H. H., f.e.s., 6, Citadel Terrace, Citadel Road, Plymouth.

Mf.ra, A. W., 1, Lothian Villas, Capel Road, Forest Gate, E.

Moberly, J. C., m.a., f.e.s., “ Woodlands,” Basset, Southampton.

Nf.wbf.ry, E. A., 12, Churchill Road, Dartmouth Park, N.W.

Nicholson, C., f.e.s., 35, The Avenue, Hale End, Chingford, N.E.

Oldham, Charles. 2, Warwick Villas, Chelmsford Road, Woodford.

Pearson, G., 10, Brushfield Street, Bishopsgate, E.C.

Phillips, Hubery C., m.r.c.s., Eng., m. & l.s.a., Lond., f.e.s., 262, Gloucester

Terrace, Hyde Park, W.

Pickett, C. P., f.e.s., Hera House, 00, Dawlish Road, Leyton.

Potter, A. T., Whangerei, Auckland, New Zealand.

Prout, Louis. B., f.e.s., “The Elms,” 246, Richmond Road, Dalston, N.E.
Riches, J., 52, Calverley Grove, Hornsey Rise, N.

Robertshaw, Arthur, Ellenroyde Hall, Luddenden Foot, Yorks.

Rosevf.ar, .J. Burman, m.c.s., .m.m.s., 113, New King’s Road, Fulham, S.W.
Roctledgk, G. B., f.e.s., Tarn Lodge, Head’s Nook, Carlisle.

Rydon, A., “ Awbrook,” Linfield, Sussex.

Sauer, H. A., 11, Venner Road, Sydenham, S.E.

Sequeira, James Scott, m.r.c.s., Crescent House, Cassland Road, South Hackney,

N.E.

Setii-Smith, L. M., “Alleyne,” Caterham Valley.

Shaw, V. Eric, 8, Moss Hall Grove, North Finchley.

Sicn, Alfred, f.e.s., Corner House, Chiswick, W.

Stiff, Jas., 3, Thornton Hill, Wimbledon.

Studd, E. F., m.a., n.c.L., f.e.s., Oxton, Exeter.

Thorxthwaite, W., f.r.a.s., Claremont House, Hersham, Walton-on-Tliames.
Tutt, J. W., f.e.s., Rayleigh Villa, Westcombe Hill, S.E.

West, Fredk. T., 64, Brooke Road, Wood Street, Walthamstow, N.E.

Woolley, H. S., 7, Park Row, Greenwich.

Wrioht, I)r. Dudley, f.e.s., 55, Queen Anne Street, Cavendish Square, W.

HONORARY MEMBERS.

Anderson, E., “ Morningside,” Cunningham Road, Toorak, Victoria, Australia.
Avebury, Lord., m.p., f.l.s., f.r.s., f.e.s., High Elms, Beckenham.

Robson, J. E., f.e.s., Hartlepool.

Walsingham, Lord, m.a., f.r.s., f.l.s., f.z.s., Merton Hall, Thetford, Norfolk.

REPORTS OF MEETINGS.

Dec. 17th, 1901. — New Member Elected. — Mr. T. H. Hamling, of
7, Hornsey Rise, N., was elected a member of the Society.

Mullerian association from G ciANA. — Mr. \\ . J. Kaye exhibited
specimens of Itluonia zarepha, Ithmnia jiarula, Stalactis phaedusa,
Stalactis erdina , and Lanron partita , species belonging to widely dif¬
ferent families, in which the colouring and pattern were strikingly
alike. It was stated that these specimens were found together on an
occasion when scarcely another species was about.

Erannis species. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, Erannis defoliaria , very dark
specimens, and Erannis aurantiaria almost unicolourous.

Aporophyla australis from Isle of Wight. — Mr. S. -T. Bell,
Aporo phyla australis from Sandown, Isle of Wight.

Aporophylas from Sussex and Reading. — Mr. H. Id. May, Aporo-
phyla australis, taken in September, 1901, at rest in pairs, on grass
bents on Downs at Lewes, Sussex ; also Aporophyla lutulenta from
near Reading, and young larva3 of same, the former feeding on grass,
the latter on chickweed.

Larv.e of Epunda lichenea and Aporophyla lutulenta. — Mr. A.
Bacot, larva) of Epunda lichmea feeding on dock, and larvie of Aporo¬
phyla lutulenta feeding on grass.

Variable Epirrita dilutata, etc. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw, a very vari¬
able series of Epirrita dilutata from the New Forest, Finchley, and
Epping Forest, the specimens from the latter localities being very
dark. A strikingly fine reddish < 'olotois pmnaria was also shown.

Paper. — Mr. Alfred Sich read a paper entitled “ Observations on
the Early Stages of Phyllocnistis sufusella.” (See Transactions.) At
the close of the paper Dr. Chapman rose to propose a vote of thanks,
and remarked that he had not found that the sickle-shaped excresence
of the pupa broke off on the moth’s emerging from the cocoon, as
mentioned by Mr. Sich. Mr. Cox inquired if the larva finished at
base of stalk or top of leaf, as he supposed that if food ran short it
would be more advantageous to the larva to finish oft in such a posi¬
tion that it would be ready to attack a second leaf. Mr. A. Bacot
seconded the vote, and asked if it was true that the young larva showed
no tubercles, hut that they appeared later on. If this was so it was the
reverse of the usual state of things. Mr. Sich, replying to the several
questions, said that as regards the apical hooks on the pupa, he had
found most with the hooks broken off. The larva, he had observed,
spun its cocoon at the base of the leaf usually, but was to be found in
all positions round the edge of the leaf. Rarely the cocoon was to lie
found in the centre of the leaf. As regards the tubercles in the young
larva, he had never been able to find any.

Jan. 7th, 1902. — Stauropus fagi. — Mr. C. Nicholson exhibited
Stauropns fayi from Epping Forest and the New Forest, the former
being considerably darker. Mr. A. Bacot exhibited larvie of the same
species.

Graphiphoea gothica forms. — Mr. AY. J. Kaye, a varied series of
(t raphiphora yuthica, with various phases of the form yothicina and
others, chiefly from Rannoch.

Aporia crataegi from Kent. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw, some Aporia
rratat'ui , recently taken in Kent. Mr. Shaw remarked that the species
had been secured in the same locality year after year since 1893.

Cuspidja megacephala almost black. — Mr. Shaw also exhibited a
specimen of ( itspidio meyacepbala, from Manchester, with almost black
forewings*.

Exotic golden cassida. — Mr. H. Heasler, a beautiful golden-
coloured Cassida, discovered in an imported apple. The beetle was
remarkable in that, with handling, the gold colour temporarily disap¬
peared.

Graphiphoea incerta and Graphiphora munda. — Mr. L. B. Prout,
G raphiphora incerta, from Rannoch, and a very variable series of
G raphiphora munda , several of which were only with difficulty to be
distinguished from G. incerta.

New Forest Coleoptera. — Mr. Henderson, present as a visitor,
Clytus mysticus , Mesasa nubila, Callidium car labile, and Clytus alni, all
from the New Forest.

Pupa of Stauropus fagi. — Mr. Henderson further exhibited a
living pupa of Stauropus fayi.

Paper on Stauropus fagi. — Mr. A. \Y. Mera read a paper on
“ Stauropus Jayi." (See Transactions.) In the discussion that fol¬
lowed Mr. Burrows said he understood that with this insect pairing
took place about midnight. Mi-. A. Sich enquired of Mr. Mera if he
had ever observed the larva of Stauropus fayi changing its skin. Mr.
•J. W. Tutt said that as to times of appearance there was evidently an
enormous range in the time. The species was well known to be found
in Kent. As regards the change of colour in the larva, remarked on
by Mr. Mera, it was no doubt largely a physiological effect. Mr. H. H.
May had found a larva on buckthorn, and wondered whether this was
a known pabulum. Mr. C. Nicholson said he did not consider this
insect particularly well protected, as he had found the species in
Epping Forest not very well concealed. Dr. Chapman, in making
some observations on the larva, said that once the larva has assumed
one or another colour it must keep to it, and could not undergo a
second change.

Jan. 21st, 1902. — Pup.e of Lachnkis lanestris and Endkomis
yebsicolora. — Dr. T. A. Chapman exhibited specimens of Lachneis
lanestris and End ram is rersicolora in the pupal state, illustrating the
circumstance that the imagines are developed in the pupa in the
autumn for the emergence of the following spring. Those that go
over to a second year remain all the winter undeveloped.

Synopsia abruptaria. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, Synopsia abruptaria
larvae of a fourth brood.

South American Satyrid.e. — Mr. A . J. Kaye, specimens from
Guiana and Peru of the highly specialised Satyrids Callitaera menan-
iler, I laetrra piera, II. phyllis, and others of the same group. These
insects he had always found flying very near the ground, and they

4 Since named ab. nigra, Shaw (I'.nt. Her., xiv., p. IQ.'S).

were particularly fond of flitting about beneath low-growing plants.
They were also strongly attracted by rotten fruit.

Dark Gonodontis bidentata. — -Mr. T. H. Hamling, a very dark
coloured (bred) Gonodontis bidentata (ab. nit/ra).

Gkaphiphoka species. — Mr. H. H. May, a cabinet drawer full ot
G rapliiphora species, mostly from Wimbledon. Mr. Sich, remarking
on this exhibit, said that all the forms were much the same as one
usually gets at Chiswick and Richmond Park. He noticed also in the
series of Gra/dii/ilmra in undo there were no specimens of the form im-
inanilata. Rev. C. R. N. Burrows said, at Brentwood one never meets
with vars. of this insect. Mr. Alfred Sich further remarked that
Grajdit'iiltora jndveruli'nta was now much commoner at Chiswick than
formerly.

Concerning IYp.e of Lachneis lanestris. — Mr. Bacot, in refer¬
ring to Dr. Chapman’s exhibit, said insects could not be induced to
hatch if the weather was ever so favourable. Mr. W . J. Kaye en¬
quired if /.. lanestris went over two years in a state of nature. Dr.
Chapman replied that probably more than fifty per cent, did so.

Colour Photography Lecture. — Rev. C. R. N. Burrows intro¬
duced Mr. T. Jessop, who gave a very clear demonstration of the
process known as the “ Sanger-Shepherd,” by which colour photo¬
graphy had come to be a real thing. A large number of slides were
exhibited and thrown on the screen, these included a number of lepi -
doptera, which were readily recognised. At the close Mr. 11. 11. May
proposed a vote of thanks to Mr. Jessop, coupling with his name that
of Mr. R. \Y. Robbins, who had kindly brought and worked the lan¬
tern for the occasion ; Mr. Sich seconded the vote, which was carried
unanimously.

Feb. 4th, 1902. -Pocket Box Exhibition. — Mr. L. B. Prout,
/ 'eri unna tarniata from N. Devon. He remarked that although he had
obtained ova he was unable to rear the larva) when hatched for want
of a suitable pabulum. Also, on behalf of Mr. J. P. Mutch, Entjouia
/xili/chlorns, a dark aberration, suggesting reversion to a more ancestral
form under stimulus of cold at time of pupation ; a dark aberration of
< 'hri/sn/dumns /ihlae.as ; a perfectly halved gynandromorphous specimen
of Aijrotis i mta wdth the right side $ and left side ? ; and a curious
aberration of Amat/ws sobrina, with white antenna). Mr. \\ . J. Kaye
asked with reference to the last species if it might not be a form of
albinism. Mr. Prout said that out of a large number taken by him¬
self and three others, only three specimens had these white antenna-.
Mr. C. P. Pickett, a tine bred series of Plusia nionrta, from Bexley.
Mr. W. J. Kaye, a varied series of Mcristis tri'jammica, including ab.
bilinea, also a specimen of A gratis restii/ialis ab. nn/ra, from Oxshott.
Mr. A. Bacot, a line bred series of hybrids between Malamsi.nia
nenstria and M. vastrensis, the J s of the brood being remarkable for
their constancy. Mr. S. J. 1 fell, a series of ('yinato/diora n/iandata,
from Wimbledon and New Forest, including the ab. nintrrxaria from
the latter locality. Mr. T. 11. Hamling, some Gonodontis bidentata
ab. nit/ra. He stated that out of a brood of about 150, half were of
the dark race. Mr. Russell James, a number of insects, including a

specimen of Cbelenastes /liniaria, with antenna- transitional between
J and 5? . Rev. C. R. N. Burrows, lli/ilnuria nietitans var. /’alndis

and Ortluma lota ab. rufa. Mr. A. W. Mera, Spilote yrossulariata ,
including one from Chiswick with a broad post-median black band,
and another from Aberdeen with the marginal half of the forewing
black. Dr. Chapman, some larval cases of a South American species
of Perophora. Mr. Southey, a cabinet drawer full of Sijnopsia abrup-
tana, with the dark form and some intermediates, from Holloway.
Mr. Southey said he had never obtained the black form if the larva;
were fed on privet. Dr. Sequeira, a box containing a large number of
dwarf specimens of British Lepidoptera.

Deb. lHth, 1902. — Paper. — Mr. V. J. Kaye read a paper, “ After
Lepidoptera in British Guiana in 1901.” (See Transactions.)
In accordance with his invitation, the meeting was held at his
house, in order that members might inspect the numerous specimens
resulting from the expedition.

March 4th, 1902. — Anthrocera paludih. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw ex¬
hibited specimens of Anthrocera trifolii palmlis from the New Forest.

Cleora ljchenaria. — Mr. Kaye, fine specimens of t'lcora lichcnaria,
from the New Forest.

Asymmetrical cidakia eulvata. — Mr. Alfred Sich, a fine specimen
of I 'iilciria fulvata.

Plekocymia clavaria (cervinaria). — Mr. Handing, some bred Plcro-
(i/inia Havana.

Cymatophoiia (tEmmaria, jilack. — Mr. Hamling further exhibited a
striking black geometer, which he considered to be < i/matophora
item maria.

Larva oe Cosses cossus. Dr. J. S. Sequeira, a living larva of
Cossus cossus, spinning up in cotton wool for want of its natural
surroundings.

Variable Ennomos quercinaria. — Mr. \Y. Bloomfield, a variable
series of Ennomos ipicrcinaria and ova of same from Kidmore, near
Heading, the imagines being taken by shaking small beeches.

Paper. — Mr. A. Bacot read a paper bearing on ,l The Classification
of the Sjihinijidae.” (See Transactions.)

March 18th, 1902. — New Member Elected. — Mr. Montagu F.
Hopson, D.E.S., of 16, Bosslyn Hill, Hampstead, was elected a
member of the Society.

Ebony Tunnelled by Lakv.e. — Mr. Y. Eric Shaw exhibited a
block of ebony tunnelled by some unknown larvie.

Anthrocera trieolii in early July. — Mr. C. Nicholson, some
Anthrocera trifolii, taken during the first week in July in the New
Forest.

Tephrosia bistortata from West Wickham. — Mr. Nicholson, on
behalf of Mr. Gardner, Tephrosia bistortata from Vest Wickham, taken
off larch.

Apokophyla lutulenta. — Rev. C. R. N. Burrows, Aporoplujla
latnlcnta taken at sugar at Mucking iu 1901, although less commonly
than in previous years.

Calamia letosa from Rain ham. — Mr. S. J. Bell, a series of Lalamia
latosa taken off low reeds at Rain ham.

Dkymonia chaonia. Mr. Alfred Sich, a bred specimen of Dn/monia

rhannia, which had knocked itself to pieces through being placed in a
pill-box,

Paper Read.- — Dr. Chapman read a paper, entitled “ Notes on the
(jraciluriadae." He commenced by going into the position the
(j-racilanadae occupied in the system of classification, and stated that
not only for the family under discussion, but in a general way, we
should use the characters afforded by the early stages, but should not
debar the imaginal ones. The Graeilariadae offered most useful
characters in the early stages, particularly in the larva and pupa.
The mouth parts in the former showed remarkable specialisations,
which might be considered as advanced, for it was accepted that if an
organ was complicated it was to be considered advanced, and if simple
degraded. This was said to be true only if applied to an organ, and
not to the insect altogether. In the genus (iracilciria the unusual
phenomenon in the larva occurred that while the early instars were
modified the later ones were normal. Dr. Chapman in part accounted
for this by stating that each larval instar is equal to the pupal period,
and (piite independent of further instars. As a rule the full grown
larva was much more liable to specialisation, owing to its different
mode of life. Various details were then given as to the different ap¬
pearance of different mines made by the larvae. The structure of the
pupa was then gone into, and it was stated that it came under the
division “ lncompletre,” having only two segments free. This was a
most unusual and uncommon type, and as it was so rare in the lepi-
doptera generally, it was reasonable to suppose that the type was not a
useful one. In < I raci/aria the incomplete pupa was the extreme in
that direction, having more movable segments than any other. At
the close of the paper Mr. Prout said that the early stages in the
larva being specialised and the later ones not so was against our usual
ideas of phylogeny being built upon ontogeny. Mr. Nicholson en¬
quired of the use of the silk spun by 1 dthocolletix lame on the under¬
side of the cuticle of the leaf after it has consumed the parenchyma.
Dr. Chapman replied to Mr. Nicholson’s question that the silk was
used to make the cuticle more robust, the larva making two silken
contacts which fold the leaf by contraction.

April 1st, 1902. — New Members Elected. — Mr. F. T. West, 04,
Brooke Road, M ood Street, Walthamstow ; and Mr. W. Jackson, 5P,
St. John’s Lane, Clerkenwell, were elected members of the Society.

Mullerian association of Guiana Insects. — Mr. W. J. Kaye ex¬
hibited a box of British Guiana insects, illustrating several instances
of Mullerian association. One of these included Ij/mrea /tasiniintia,
/.. ceres, Melinaea mnrine, Melinaea n.s/i., M. erameri . M. ei/ina, Meeha-
it ill's dnri/ssiis, Cerrtiiiiti J'enestella , / leliemiins ret list ns, and II. ninnato,
all with, or tending to have, a black hindwing. In such associations
it was generally supposed that the / leliemiins set the pattern or was
the centre, by reason of its being the commonest and most con¬
spicuous. but in this group the I leliemiins species were actually rather
uncommon, and it was supposed that here some other species was the
dominant individual. Meliuaea mneme easily came first in point of
numbers, and as it was itself a strong variant, there appeared no reason
why this species should not have been the type for the group.

Special Exhibit of European Riioraloceua. — A very large quail-

tity of interesting material was brought up for inspection. Mr. Alfred
Sich contributed from Wiesbaden, Mr. L. B. Prout from Tenerifte and
Austria, Mr. H. H. May from Switzerland, where he stated that in the
past summer, during a six weeks’ stay, he had met with between 100
and 110 species of butterflies; Dr. Chapman a large number of
E rebias. He said the genus Krebia undoubtedly had its headquarters
in Switzerland. There were but few species in Asia and America,
and the great mass were to be found in the limited area of Switzer¬
land. The species of Krebia showed a parallel range of variation one
to another, and from the difficulty in obtaining their life-history they
offered great difficulties to specific determination. Mr. Prout asked if
it was known what caused the greasy, smooth-scaled appearance of
the species found at high altitudes. Dr. Chapman replied, he thought
in a great meisure it was due to rubbing, and the bad condition of the
specimens. Mr. May said he found that frequently there appeared no
pabulum in places where the species were flying. Dr. Chapman re¬
marked that although the species like to fly round the barest rocks
they do not breed there.

April 15th, 1902. — Dark Hyberniau.e. — Mr. C. P. Pickett ex¬
hibited several examples of spring Hi/bernia<lac, including some very
dark l\ railin'* leucophaearia, from Epping Forest. He stated that this
year (1902) such forms had been far more frequent.

Angerona prunaria Ekky.e. — Mr. Pickett further exhibited some
forced lame of Aiu/emna prunaria.

Spilosoma lubricipeda. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw, Spilt ism net Inbriri/ieila
from Meltham, near Huddersfield.

Spring Lepidoptera at Brentwood. — Mr. A. W. Mera, several of
the spring Lepidoptera recently taken at Brentwood, including
A/iochdina hispiilaria and Phii/alia /ir/laria. He said he had found the
lame of these two species very much alike, and would wish to know
of a distinctive character. A series of Graphiphora miniosa was also
exhibited from Brentwood (Essex).

Graphiphora populeti abundant. — Mr. W. J. Kaye said he had
taken Graphiphora populeti abundantly at Surbiton, in a small circum¬
scribed area. Graphiphora ;/ radii* had not been seen.

Note on Graphiphora gracilis. — Mr. Fuller said he had generally
taken Graphiphora // radii* in May, resting on grass stems.

Appearance of Graphiphora jiunda. — Mr. E. M. Dadd found that
for Graphiphora iniunla the sallows were too late, this insect being the
very earliest of the Tacniocainpidae.

Note on Pachnobia species, etc.— Dr. Chapman had noticed that
at Hereford Pachnobia Icucoi/rapha appeared later than /’. rubricosa.
Mr. Dadd said he had not found this the case at Selborne. He further
gave some of his experiences in Berlin, where he said A*tero*copu*
nubecuLo.vis was always found on alders in swampy places, and never
on birch trunks. In point of time, insects in Berlin were fully a
month later than in Britain.

Development of Asphalia flavicornis pupa.- — Dr. Chapman asked
if it was known whether A*phalia jiavicorni* was developed in the
autumn. He remarked that Lachnei * lanestri* was developed from the
middle of August right up to the middle of winter.

Amokpha i’opuli x Smerinthus ocellata. — Mr. A. Bacot ex-

hibited a tine hybrid Amorpha />o/nUi 7 x > Siuerintlius ucellatu $ ,
together with pupa of same. Dr. Chapman on examining the pupa-
case said that the female covering was abnormal, but the male cover¬
ing quite normal.

Assembling with Pachys strataria. — Mr. Bacot said he had
recently assembled 24 $ and 7 $ Pachi/s strataria on successive
nights.

Br echos parthenias common in Epping Eorest. — Mr. Pickett, on
Easter Monday last, had found Brephm /larthcnias commonly in
Epping Forest.

May (3th, 1902. Hygrochuoa sykingaria larv.-k, etc. — -Mr. V.
Eric Shaw exhibited some II mimcli ma si/riiit/aria larva) full fed, also a
] )ri/»cm’tis ‘ilubruria larva from the New Forest.

Plekocy.mia clavaria (cekvinaria) Lakv.k on Hollyhock, etc.—
Mr. Kaye, Plrmnjmia cerrinaria larva; being fed on hollyhock; also a
couple of Lithtma ilc/dana which were being fed on a powdery green
lichen growing on oak trunks.

Spilote i • ltoss i ' lari at a, Exhibit and Discussion.- — Mr. J. A. Clark,
many fine aberrations of S/iilutr t/mssulariata ; Mr. C. P. Pickett, a
cabinet drawer full of S. i/mssnlariata ; Mr. A. W. Mera, also a large
number of the same species, with several fair aberrations, chiefly with
a darkening tendency. Mr. Mera observed that it was frequently
noticeable that the northern forms of this species showed the darken¬
ing on the margins, while southern, and particularly those specimens
from north London, had the central portion of the wing dark. Mr.
Riches and Mr. Nicholson also exhibited this species, the latter ob¬
serving that larva-* found wild in the open country were always pale,
while those found in gardens were generally dark. The imagines were,
however, the same from both. Mr. Prout said be had found that
larva; from the country were generally later. Mr. Mera was strongly
of opinion that the colouring in the larva; of this species was not an
hereditary trait. He further called attention to the fact that he had
found I ‘acln/s Ix’tnlaria lame differently coloured in the same district
on differently coloured tree stems. Mr. Kaye said there must be some
other agency at work, as Mr. Merrifield had proved with I'a/alin
inacliaon, that the larva, in changing to pupa, acted responsively to its
environment.

Living larva of Angerona puunaria. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, a living
larva of Amjerona fir unaria.

Sheringham Woods Enclosure. — Mr. Pickett reported that the
Sheringham Woods, near Cromer, were to be closed to the public in
future, owing to destruction.

Melit.ua cinxia larv.-k. — Mr. Prout reported that he had just
visited the Isle of Wight, and had found Mrlitara cin.ria lame very
small, but when warmth was applied they began to feed rapidly.

Delegate to South-Eastern Union of Scientific Societies'
Congress.— Mr. Prout nominated, and Mr. Nicholson seconded, Mr.
•). W. Tutt to be the Society’s delegate to the Congress of the South-
Eastern Union of Scientific Societies for 1902.

May 20th, 1902. Hybrid malacosomas. Mr. Bacot exhibited a
hybrid larva from a pairing of A Malamsuma lu'nstiia and 7 Mala-

cusoma custrensi*. He also showed a larva of Malacusoma francunica.

FIeliophila impudens. — Mr. 8. J. Bell, a series of Heliophila impu-
(Inw, including specimens from Wimbledon, both bred and captured,
and one from the New Forest, the latter being more suffused with
pink than the London forms.

General Exhibit of Cyaniris aruiolus, and Discussion. — Mr. A.
W. Mera, series of Cyaniris aryiulus, which showed the darker colora¬
tion of second brood 2 2 , as compared with those of first brood ;
Mr. C. P. Pickett, < ary him from Clandon, including a 2 of first
brood, showing a distinct tendency towards the coloration usually cha¬
racteristic of second brood ; Mr. L. B. Prout, specimens of first and
second brood of 2 $ , to illustrate the difference already referred to,
also a t? taken at St. Helens, Isle of Wight, on April 21st, 1902.
The President, in opening the discussion on the spread of < '. aryiolux
in the environs of London, remarked that he had never seen it in any
suburban locality nearer than Wood Street, Walthamstow. Mr. A.
W. Mera stated that he took larva) of aryiolux at Chiswick in 1877,
and saw the perfect insect on the wing at Hammersmith a year or
two later. Mr. Shaw recorded its appearance at Finchley in fair
numbers recently. Mr. Bell had seen it occasionally in Brixton Road,
and Mr. Bacot at Clapton — both localities within the four-mile radius,
in response to a question raised by Mr. Prout, Mr. Mera stated that
C. aryiolm pupated on the underside of a leaf. Upon Mr. Prout’s
suggesting that a succession of favourable seasons might be the reason
of the evident spread of this species round London, Mr. Bacot pointed
out that as the ova are laid on blossom, should rough weather occur
before they hatched, they would probably be swept away by the wind
and destroyed. Mr. Prout, in summarising the discussion, drew three
conclusions therefrom — i that ( aryiulux had certainly become
more plentiful of late years, that it was spreading near London, and
that these facts were probably accounted for by favourable climatic
conditions.

Note on Leugoma chrysorrhcea. — Mr. A. Bacot remarked that it
was curious that a brood of Leucoma chrysorrhoea in his possession did
not seem adversely affected by the prevalent cold weather, as he con¬
sidered that the severity of the climate was the cause of this insect’s
extinction. Mr. Prout pointed out that L. chrysorrhoea could hardly
have ever been as plentiful as it undoubtedly was in times past if the
climate was the cause of its extinction. Mr. A. W. Mera questioned
whether it ever really became extinct. He knew that the late Mr. -J.
A. Cooper took a specimen on a lamp near Eastbourne during the so-
called period of extinction, and, further, that the first specimens he
(Mr. Mera) had received since the recurrence of the species came from
the same locality. Mr. Burrows recorded finding two nests of the
larva) of L. chrysorrhoea at Stanford-le-liope, Essex.

Note on Polia flavicincta ova. — Mr. Prout recorded that from a
batch of ova of Polia flavicincta hatchings had been going on over a
period of three to four weeks.

Disease in Graphiphora opima. — Mr. Mera said the larva of ( j rapid -
phora opima was subject to disease and death when nearly full fed. He
trad observed that the premonitory symptoms were that the body of
the larva was depressed behind the head, and that the larva nibbled
the mid-rib instead of the edge of the leaf. Mr. Bacot believed that

disease generally attacked lame at a certain definite stage in their de¬
velopment. In rearing large numbers of Lasiocampa ijuercus, he had
noticed that when many in the penultimate skin were dying, the
forward lame of the same brood which had reached the last stage
were not affected.

Note ox Larva of Eutricha quercifolia. — Mr. A. W. Mera found
that the larva of Kutricha quercifolia discharged a quantity of strong¬
smelling fluid before pupation. On one occasion when he was breed¬
ing this insect he had seen that as soon as the largest larva; had
pupated the rest of the brood sickened and died. This fact he attri¬
buted to the smell of the fluid referred to. Mr. V. Eric Shaw bore
out Mr. Mera’s experience with this insect.

June 3rd, 1902. — New Member Elected. — Mr. G. H. Heath, of
277, 11 rock ley Hoad, S.E., was elected a member of the Society.

Melanic Goxodontis bidentata. — Mr. T. Handing exhibited a bred
series of the melanic form of (fonodontis bidentata, including specimens
in which even the pale line in the forewing was obliterated.

Bred Anoerona prunaria. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, bred specimens of
Amjerona prunaria, including a J with right hindwing of lighter
coloration than the left.

Asymmetrical Dilina tillk. — Mr. Pickett, a long-bred series of
l>ili>ia tiliae, among which were a $ with unusually dark hindwings
and two asymmetrical specimens.

Cyaxikis aroiolus at Clapton. — Mr. Prout said he had seen < 'y an his
an/iidu s at Clapton during the day (June 3rd).

Note on Cyclophora pobata. — Mr. Prout also remarked on the
curious fact that although, while breeding from the first brood of
( 'i/clnjihnra j to rata, be had never been able to rear a second brood
therefrom, yet pupie from ova obtained by him from a second brood
female taken at Starcross in August had produced imagines the same
year (/.<•., a third brood).

Third brood of Syxopsia abruptaria. — Mr. C. P. Pickett stated
that two larva; of Sipmpsia abruptaria belonging to a third brood
which hatched in September, 1301, had only just pupated (June, 1902),
the pupa; being abnormally large.

June 17th, 1902.— Bred Nemoria viridata, etc. — Mr. S. J. Bell
exhibited bred series of A cnmria viridata and Jodis ehri/soprasaria.

LaRV.E OF PaRNASSIL’S APOLLO AND PvRNASSIUS DELIUS. - Dr. T. A.

Chapman, larva; of / ‘arnassius a pi din and Parnassian deli us, which
very closely resembled one another. Dr. Chapman pointed out, as
one method of differentiation, that the lateral spots on I', a polio were
orange, while those of /’. delins were yellow, at the same time remark¬
ing that since he had first noted that fact the spots on l\ delius had
become almost as orange in tint as in /'. a polio.

Lymantiua monacba inbred. — Mr. Pickett, larva; of / npuantria
mniiacha, which were fully up to the average si/e, despite the fact
that they were the result of nine years’ interbreeding.

Gonodontis bidentata and Euhtroma nilaceata. - Mr. L. P>.
prout, < ioiiodoutis bidentata , including a rather dark specimen from
Knnnoch and a light one from Sandown ; also a bred series of

Eustmma silaceata, including ab. imulata, Haw. Mr. Prout mentioned
that this latter species would feed up on fuchsia in captivity.

Gonodontjs bidentata, etc. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw, dark forms of
Gonodontis bidentata from Manchester ; also a cocoon of Plusia moneta,
and ova of E drop is punctularia and Anagoga pulveraria.

Ova op Ccf.nocalpe vitalbata. — Mr. C. Nicholson, ova of Coenocalpe
vitalbata.

Note on Gonodontis bidentata, distribution. — Mr. J. W. Tutt
observed that it was curious that so far as he could remember there
were no specimens of Gonodontis bidentata of the dark form in any of
the large collections, old or recent. This pointed to the probability
that this form was a modern development, and it would be interesting
to see if the normal colour of the thorax would be maintained in the
future. Mr. G. H. Heath said this form of G. bidentata had, to his
knowledge, been commonly met with in the Dewsbury district for
several years past.

Mf.lit.ea cinxia retarded by cold. — Mr. L. P. Prout remarked
that owing to the unseasonable weather his brood of Melitaea cinxia
had remained an abnormally long time, both in the last larval skin
and in the pupal stage. The resulting imagines were all obviously
weak, and many were crippled, but on the whole there was much
variation.

Pachys betularia paired with ab. doubledayaria. — Mr. C.
Nicholson recorded the capture at Brentwood of a pair of Pachys
betularia, in cop., the $ being of the ab. doubledayaria.

July 1st, 1902. — Pachys betularia ab. doubledayaria. — Mr. J. A.
Clark exhibited five specimens of Pachys betularia ab. doubledayaria ,
bred from York.

Variation in Bankia aroentula. — Mr. G. H. Heath, a series of
Bankia argentula from Chippenham Fen, the ground colour of the
wing of some of the specimens being brick-red and of others grey-
green ; some also showed considerable variation in the position and
prominence of the stripe near the outer margin of forewing.

Angerona prunaria Aberrations. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, bred speci¬
mens of Angerona prunaria, including a J specimen with the darker
bands barely discernable.

Statistics on Gonodontis bidentata.- — Mr. T. Hamling, a long
series of Gonodontis bidentata, consisting mainly of the ab. nigra. The
following statistics were given with reference to the exhibit : —

Ova obtained from

Number

Number
ab. nigra
bred.

Number

type

bred.

Cripples.

Non-

pupated.

ab. nigra

type.

emergences.

Typical parents

Ab. nigra ? with

typical d

Ab. nigra d with

•21

»)

typical ?

•j

Ab. nigra d and ?

120

314

140

Neurta reticulata (saponari.e) , etc., at Mucking. — Rev. C. R. N.

Burrows recorded the capture of several Xeuria reticulata and two
Clioerocampa porcdlus at Mucking (Essex), the C. porcdlus taken at
valerian.

Apamea unanimis at Wicjcen. — Mr. Burrows had also found Apainea
unanimis plentiful at Wicken ; many specimens were of the very dark
form. He expressed the opinion that the season was about three
weeks behind the usual time as regards emergences. He mentioned a
large number of insects usually common in his garden that he had, so
far, not seen this year, including A.v;/lia putris, A 'plena litho.cylea,
Busina umbratica ( tenebrosa .), Ayrotis corticea, Xaenia typica , Mamestra
thalassina.

August 19th, 1902. — Giant Rusticus from Spain. — Dr. T. A.
Chapman, specimens of a Lycaenid from central Spain, which were
apparently a very large form of Husticus ary us (aeyon).

Sfilosoma mendica from Finchley. — Mr. J. A. Clark, a variable
series of Spilosoma mendica, bred from Finchley ova.

Endromis versicolora and Dilina tiliae. — Mr. A. W. Mera, bred
specimens of Endromis versicolora from the Reading district ; also a
bred Dilina tiliae, with the usual central green band on forewing
almost absent.

Eucosmia undulata and Efpithecia linariata. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw,
a series of Eucosmia undulata, bred from ova obtained from a New
Forest female; also Eupithccia linariata bred from Uxbridge.

Note on Dimorpha versicolora.- — Mr. A. W. Mera exhibited
Dimorpka ( Endromis ) versicolora, and remarked that he bad obtained
ova from a bred female, but could not get the larvae to feed. Dr.
Chapman confirmed this experience, but Mr. •). A. Clark said he had
inbred this insect for three successive years.

Amorpha populi pup.e under Lime Trees. — Mr. J. A. Clark re¬
corded that he had bred Amorpha populi from pupa; found under lime
trees. 'Hie only poplar tree in the immediate neighbourhood was at
least sixty yards away, and there was a high fence between it and the
lime trees in question.

Sept. 2nd, 1902. — Plaoodis dolabraria bred, etc. — Mr. .1. A.
Clark exhibited specimens of Elaymlis dolabraria, bred from larva'
beaten at High Beech, Epping Forest, and of Lomaspilix maryinata from
Queen’s M ood, Highgate.

Arctia yillica, Callimorpha dominula, and Triph.ena fimisriata
vars. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, bred varieties of Arctica villica, Callimorpha
dominula, and a series of Triphaena Jimbriata, including a specimen
with somewhat smoky hindwings.

Dilina tili.e vars. — Mr. J. Riches, a variable series of Dilina tiliae.

/Eokria musciformis. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw, a long series of Aeyeria
musciformis.

Sept.IGth, 1902. — Cucullia absinthii bred. — Mr. A. Bacot exhibited
a series of < 'ucullia absinthii bred from Weymouth.

Mypocrita .jacob.k.k from Spain. — Dr. T. A. Chapman, specimens
of Hypoeriti i jacobaeae from Spain, which showed no variation from
the English type, except, perhaps, in being somewhat larger, although
the difference between the larva* was considerable.

Sciadion obscurata vars. — Mr. G. H. Heath, a series of Sriadion
{hnophns) obscurata from Oddicombe Beach, near Torquay. Most of
the specimens were dark grey, but a few showed a pale reddish brown
coloration.

Pilina TrLi.E AND Anoerona prunaria vars. — Mr. C. P. Pickett,
l>dnia tihac bred from various localities, including several asym¬
metrical specimens. Also a long series of bred Amjerona prunaria ,
among which were some very dark forms, and pale forms with the
band almost obsolete.

Melit.ea cinxia from Isle of Wight. — Mr. L. B. Prout, a vari¬
able series of Melitaea cinxia bred from Isle of Wight larvie.

Hydriomena furcata from Wigan. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw, a bred series
ot 1 J i/ilriniiirua furcata from the colliery district near Wigan. Most of
the specimens were dark, but a few were of about the same coloration
as southern forms.

Collecting Notes for 1902. — Mr. G. H. Heath reported that he
had found sugaring a failure at Babbicombe, South Devon, during the
fiist three weeks in August. Mr. L. B. Prout had found insects plen¬
tiful at sugar in the Isle of Wight from .July 21st to 2oth. From the
latter date to the end of August sugar had proved a complete failure
near Aberdeen and at I or res, but ragwort and heather paid fairly well.
/ lusia In actca occurred freely at flowers of Pi/chuis cesperti ua . During
the first fortnight in September insects were swarming at sugar at
Sandown, Isle of Wight; farad rina atubii/ua was fairly plentiful,
A paraphilia australis occurred in abundance, and a few each of Lcucania
albipuncta and Triphaena orbona were also taken. Mr. V. Eric Shaw
remarked that at Finchley sugar failed to attract up to about
August 28th ; after that date insects gradually became more and more
plentiful.

Oct. 7th. 1902.— New Member Elected.— Mr. T. H. L. Grosvenor,
Boundary House, Hadley, Middlesex, was elected a member of the
Society.

( hi a smi a clathrata ab. — Rev. C. R. N. Burrows exhibited a speci¬
men of ( hiamiia clathrata with a great reduction of the light area.

Sirex juvencus. — Mr. Burrows further exhibited a specimen of
Sire. v juvencus.

Polyomm ATI’s corydon vars. and abs. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, a long
series of Poh/nmmatus cor/plon, including some extra large and some
very diminutive specimens from Folkestone.

Anthrocera filipendul.e ab.— Mr. C. P. Pickett, a fine aberration
of Anthrocera filijiendulac, with the pairs of spots on forewing merged
into large blotches. The specimen was bred from pupa, and came
from Folkestone.

Peronea tristana alive. — Dr. Chapman, a specimen of Peronea
tristana alive.

Orina tristis var. smaragdixa. — Dr. Chapman, a specimen of
the beetle Orina tristis var. sniaratjdina from Pino, Spain, taken
May 80th, 1902 ; also eggs and empty eggshells of same.

Spilosoma urtic.e. — Mr. A. W. Mera, Spilasoiiia urticac, the re¬
sultant of a brood having a paucity of spots.

Lepidoptf.ra from Co. Kerry. — Mr. IV. J. Kaye, a box containing
lepidoptera taken in the west of co. Kerry in June, 1902, including

Coenonympfta typhon of large size, Melitaea aurinia var. praeclara,
Eupithecia renosata of the dark form approaching those from Shet¬
land, and Pyrausta fnnebris (octomaculata).

Cosmia pyralina from Worcester Park.— Mr. W. J. Kaye, a short
fresh series of ( 'omnia pyralina, taken at sugar at Worcester Park,
during the last week in July and first in August, 1902.

Calamia lutosa and Barathra pebsicari®. — Mr. J. Riches, some
Calamia lutosa, and the green and brown forms of the larva of Barathra
persicariae.

Note on Agbotis yestigialis. — Mr. Prout remarked on Ayrotis res-
tiyalis being amongst the insects taken by Mr. Kaye in June in Kerry,
and asked what the experience of members was generally regarding
this species and its time of appearance. He, personally, had taken it on
August 28th and September 1st this year at Findhorn, and had
assumed that in Scotland it would normally appear in August.
Several members said they had found July the best month for it.
It appeared, therefore, that June and August were extremes in the
times of appearance.

Note on Chrysophanus phl.f.as. — Dr. Chapman called attention to
the difference in the series of < ’ hrysophanus phlaeas from Kerry and those
from Folkestone, the latter specimens having heavy black margins,
being darker and more heavily spotted, and the ground colour much
richer in tone. Mr. Kaye also called attention to the fact that in the
Irish specimens the raying in the hindwing was much more con¬
spicuous than in the eastern Kentish specimens.

Note on Ireland as Collecting Ground. — Mr. W. I. Cox mentioned
having been to Ireland, and the good impression obtained of it as a
country for collecting in. Mr. Kaye said he had found insect life gene¬
rally scarce, this being the dictum of Kane and other resident Irish
entomologists. Woodland was scarce, but where it was found insect
life was often much more abundant and concentrated.

Breeding of Apokophyla lutulenta. — Mr. F. J. Hanbury inquired
if anybody present had had any experience with breeding A. lutulenta .
Mr. A. Bacot answered he had found that they were exceedingly
delicate when in the last stadium.

Oct. 21st, 1902. — Polygonia C-album pup.e . — Mr. Alfred Sich
exhibited Polyyoma e-album pup*, illustrating how late the season
had been. lie said now that the food-plant, the hops, were washed,
the species was getting scarce in Worcestershire. Mr. V. Eric Shaw
said he understood that Mrs. Hutchinson fed her larva' on nettle and
currant.

Catocala nymph.ea. — Dr. T. A. Chapman, < 'atocala nymphaea
from Piedrahita, in Spain. In the course of his remarks he said
when it iiew round the evergreen oak trees in bright sunshine some¬
times in hundreds, a dozen or so could be disturbed oft’ every tree.
The species belonged to the section of the genus with pencils of hairs
on the 3 intermediate tibia1.

Exhibition and Discussion on Hydriomena furcata.- In view of
a discussion arranged on Hydriomena J areata, several members
exhibited a number of specimens of this species. Mr. Y. Erie Shaw,
some fine black forms from Wigan, also varying phases from the New
Forest, Finchley, and N. Cornwall. Mr. C. P. Pickett, specimens

from Oxshott, Clandon, and Folkestone. Rev. C. R. N. Burrows,
specimens from the Essex marshes, containing very large green
forms. Mr. W. J. Kaye, examples from Worcester Park and the
Yorkshire moors, the latter being of the usual small size and very
variable. Mr. A. W. Mera, the bilberry forms from Sevenoaks.
Mr. L. B. Prout, a very long series of the same species, and also
Hydriomena autumnalis and Hydriomena ruberata. Mr. C. Nicholson,
specimens from the New Forest. He raised the question, “ Where
does this abundant species rest ? ” He had never found the imago
except on the wing. With H. autumnalis ( trifasciata ) the case was
quite the reverse. Mr. Sauze, some bred examples, fed on sallow,
from Dawlish, Cumberland, and Deal. Mr. H. J. Turner, Brockley
specimens bred on nut, Macclesfield specimens fed on bilberry, and
also some from Deal. The Macclesfield specimens were particularly
fine, and some almost black. Mr. Prout said, in referring to Mr.
Nicholson’s remarks, that the bilberry forms were always more
variable than others. According to Reid, when at Pitcaple he had
found the larva feeding on heather in Scotland. Mr. Prout suggested
that the phenomena of the larva feeding on such dissimilar plants as
sallow and bilberry might be explained by the larvae wandering from
the bilberry to the small pieces of dwarf sallow that frequently grow
amongst bilberry, and having once acquired a taste for sallow, feeding
indiscriminately on the larger species of SalLv. Dr. Chapman
inquired if there was ever a second brood. The President answered
that there was only one brood, the emergences being spread over a
long period. Dr. Chapman, in calling attention to the strong tendency
to variation in the bilberry-fed specimens, said that bilberry patches
could offer a great variety of aspects and colours, each of which the
moth could select as a resting-place. Mr. Prout said it was well
known that when this moth flew up into the air birds attacked it
freely, and he himself had seen it happen again and again.

Sciadion obscurata. — Mr. H. J. Turner exhibited some Sciadion
obscurata. The specimens included some very pale ones from
Folkestone, very dark ones from Macclesfield, and some brownish-
tinted somewhat intermediate forms from Dawlish.

Nov. 4th, 1902. — Deilephilid pup.e. — Dr. T. A. Chapman
exhibited pupie of Celerio yallii and Myles euphorbiae, which were very
alike, but which were distinguishable in C. yallii having the
abdominal segments more flattened at the greatest width.

Ematurga atomaria ab. — Mr. W. J. Kaye, a fine aberration of
Ematurya atomaria taken on June 2nd, 1902, at Horsley. It had the
basal and post-median bands on forewing nearly absent, and all the
bands on hindwing broken up, and almost absent.

Cyclophora annulata bred. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw, some Cyelophora
annulata, bred from ova laid by a 2 taken at Eynesford, Kent,
June 22nd, 1902, the imagines appearing from August 18th to
September 3rd. He stated that the species was exceptionally easy
to rear.

Hydriomena furcata bred. — Mr. S. J. Bell, Hydriomena furcata
bred from sallow from Wimbledon.

Ennomos erosaria. — Mr. G. H, Heath, ova of Ennomos erosaria
from Sussex.

Diasticticus species.— Mr. E. A. Newbery, the coleoptera Dias-
ticticus vulneratus, a species new to Britain, and Diasticticus com-
planatus, a species lately discovered which had hitherto escaped
detection amongst D. pristonychus in most collections.

Geometrid.e from Locarno. — Mr. L. B, Prout, some Geometrician
collected by Dr. Chapman at Locarno.

Leucoma chrysorrhcea webs. — Mr. A. Bacot, spun webs of
Leucoma chrysorrhoea containing hibernating larva?, taken from
hawthorn at Pegwell Bay, Kent. Mr. A. W. Mera remarked, on
this last exhibit, that he had taken the larva? at Stanford, Essex,
which was away from the sea. Mr. F. J. Hanbury said he had seen
the imagines of this species sitting on bare black rocks near Torcross,
and that it was, in such a position, observable a great distance off.

Discussion on Establishment of a Central Entomological
Exchange Club. — Mr. F. J. Hanbury brought before the members for
discussion the matter of a Central Entomological Exchange Club for
the British Isles, to be conducted on similar lines to the existing
Botanic Exchange Club. The proposed rules of the club were read
out, and commented on where alteration was necessary in order to meet
the demands for the different matter for exchange. It would not aim
at doing away with private exchange, but would facilitate the inter¬
change of even common species from outlying and very varying locali¬
ties. It would save correspondence, time, and postage, and would
serve to supply all with local forms ol very many species. He said
said that none except very rare species should be distributed, unless in
first-class condition. The rate of exchange was a difficult matter, in
view of insectshaving a money value, and he would suggest that some
reliable dealer’s list, such as Harwood’s, of Colchester, might be used
as a standard. Rare species would be exchanged for rare species, and
not for a collection of lower priced insects which, together, would equal
the price of the rarity. There should be, he thought, at least two dis¬
tributors, who would take their turn by rotation, out of the list of
members. Last, but not least, a report should be printed at the end
of every year, containing such notes as were worth publishing concern¬
ing the insects distributed during the year. An alternative scheme was
suggested, whereby members of the club should meet four times a year,
a list be printed of all the species for distribution and sent to each
member, and each member then attend with his quota of insects.
The matter being open for discussion, Mr. Prout asked how the rate of
exchange was arrived at in botany, where dried plants practically had
no money value. Dr. Chapman thought the price was bound to be
fixed for lepidoptera. Mr. Kaye thought that specimens not comply¬
ing with the rules, instead of being destroyed, might be returned, as
sent, to their respective owners. Mr. Shaw alluded to the various
styles of setting and the varying nomenclature, each of which would
cause some difficulty. He thought that anyone should he allowed to
join the club if he or she complied with the conditions of membership.
Mr. Sich wished to know how the difficulty would be met of finding
the distributor or distributors. Mr. Hanbury answered this last
query by saying that the leading men would take their turn as in the
Botanical Club. Mr. Riches supported a self-contained club in the
Society itself. Mr. Fuller thought that a small Exchange Club in
the Society would never grow into the larger body. Mr. Bell asked

if a draft of the rules and procedure might be put in the Entomo¬
logical Magazines to see what allegiance it would bring forth.
Mr. Sich suggested a circular be printed and circulated. Mr. Prout
asked the meeting if it cared to appoint a sub-committee to confer
with other bodies in the matter. He suggested that Mr. Kaye, as
Secretary, should draft an account of the matter for the magazines.
This was agreed to and the discussion brought to a close.

Nov. 18th, 1902. — Ova of Ennomos autumnaria. — Mr. V. Eric
Shaw exhibited ova of Ennomos autumnaria from Dover.

Lymantria monacha inured. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, a cabinet drawer
full of Lymantria monacha, showing the result of several years’
selection and interbreeding with a view to obtaining a dark race.

Tiliacea aurago ab. ovo. — Mr. W. J. Kaye, a bred series of
Tiliacea aurayo, from ova laid by a $ taken at Worcester Park. It
was stated that on only this one occasion had the species been known
to occur in this locality.

Bombycia species from Ashdown Forest. — Mr. S. J. Bell,
Bombycia duplaris and Bombycia jluctuosa, both netted in Ashdown
Forest between July 12th and 17th, 1902.

Cyclophora pendularia yar. subroseata. — Mr. Prout, Cyclophora
pendularia var. subroseata from North Staffordshire.

Pale Agrotis suffusa ab. — Mr. J. A. Clark, a splendid pale
aberration of Ayrotis suffusa from South Devon.

Rules of Proposed Exchange Club. — Mr. Prout notified, con¬
cerning the Exchange Club discussed at the previous meeting, that
Mr. Kaye had drafted the proposed rules and regulations, and that it
had been arranged to have them printed in the January number of
the Entomoloyist, and that a current note on such would appear in the
Entomoloyists’ Record on the 15th of the same month.

Paper Read. — Mr. A. F. Bayne communicated a short paper on
“ An Easter Holiday in the Andes.” (See “ Transactions ”).

Dec. 2nd, 1902. — New Members Elected.— Mr. Sydney W. Dale,
44, Coolhurst Road, Crouch End, N., and Mr. L. M. Seth-Smith,
Alleyne, Caterham Valley, were elected members of the Society.

Ova of Eusarca elinguaria and Ennomids. — Mr. V. Eric Shaw
exhibited ova of Eusarca elinyuaria on blackthorn, also of Ennomos
fnsrantaria, erosaria, autumnaria, and alniaria.

C’yaniris argiolus. — Mr. C. P. Pickett, a fine 2 of Cyaniris
aryiolns of the second brood, showing a striking combination of light
and dark blue tints.

London Tortricids. — Mr. Alfred Sich, 33 species of Tortricids
taken in the London district.

Note on Ennomid species.— Mr. C. Nicholson remarked, concern¬
ing Mr. Shaw’s exhibit, that the eggs of Ennomos fnsrantaria were
somewhat intermediate between those of autumnaria and erosaria.
Mr. Prout said the species were evidently very close to one another,
and mentioned that E. autumnaria and E. quercinaria had been
successfully hybridized.

Aporophyla lutulenta. — Rev. C. R. N. Burrows, a series of
A porophyla lutulenta taken in the autumn of the present year (1902) at
Mucking. There was a conspicuous absence of variation in the series,
in contrast to his experience on former occasions.

Ova of Dryobota protea. — Mr. Burrows, some ova of Th'i/obota
protect, and remarked on the great beauty of the egg.

Xylena monoglypha ab. — Mr. S. J. Bell, a fine aberration of Xylena
monoylypha with a strong white blotch at termen of forewing ; also a
fine rich chocolate-coloured Triphaena yronnba from Sandown.

Insects from Torcross. — Dr. J. S. Sequeira, a series of Caratlrina
ambiyna, Ayrotis saucia, and others from Torcross, taken in September,
1902. He also mentioned having bred Anthrocera jilipemhdae in
September, showing the lateness of the season.

Abandonment of certain summer meetings. — Mr. Prout, from the
chair, intimated that a majority at the last Council meeting had
proposed the abandonment of the meetings in July and August, and
that he wished to know the feeling of the present meeting. On a
show of hands the arrangement was approved.

Secretaries’ Report for the year 1902.

It devolves upon the secretaries to each show off their Society to
its best advantage, and if possible to show it in a better position than
in any previous year. In some ways our Society has improved, the
attendance for the past 12 months averages over 14 per meeting,
whereas last year it only just touched 13. At the second meeting in
July, and at the first in August, it was not possible to form a quorum,
and no meetings were held, thus reducing the number of meetings
from 24 to 22, while in the previous year 23 were held. It seems
most desirable that some arrangement approved by the majority
should be arrived at by which useless trouble and loss of time of the
officers might be saved at these periods of the year. The average
attendance for July and August was only 4, so perhaps when the
matter conies up for the vote, members will agree to abandon meet¬
ings in these two months, and it is highly probable that an increased
stimulus would be given for the resumption in September. The
membership has again risen to 63 after being down to 56 last year,
and it is satisfactory to note that visitors have been far more frequent
at the meetings, 22 having been introduced as against three last year.
The “ Transactions,” which seem now to have become a regular and
constant fixture, are as eminently satisfactory as previously, and
occupy 73 pp. Mr. Prout has completed his revision of the London
Macro-Lepidopterous fauna, and an up-to-date Catalogue of the
Library has at last got into print, thanks to the action of the
Librarians. It is gratifying to know that enquiries are more
frequently made for our “ Transactions,” and that the financial aid
accruing therefrom is steadily growing. The donations to the Library
include “ British Vegetable Galls,” by E. T. Connold, presented by
Dr. Buckell, and “The Variation and Distribution of the genus
Aphodius,” presented by the author, Mr. Frank Bouskell.

Two field excursions were held : the first to Byfleet, Mr. Kaye
acting as leader. Only four members took part. The ground was
new to those present, and a very favourable impression was gained ;
but owing to the lateness of the season, very little was secured.
C yam ns aryiolus, ( 'hrysop/ianus phlaeas, Hesperia malrae, X isaniailes
tapes and Chiaswia clathrata, in some abundance late in the afternoon,
while larvae of t'hmm spartiata off broom, and larvae of Pxeiuioterpna
prumata off Genista any lira were the chief things taken.

A second excursion was one held at Leith Hill on June 21st. The
leader was Mr. V. Eric Shaw, and four other members were present.
The journey was rather a long one, and the time on the collecting
ground short, hut some good collecting was enjoyed, and everyone
carried away good impressions of the locality. The best insects
secured were Epinne advenaria (in fine condition), Eupithecia indiijata,
Kupithecia lariciata, Scadiona bdtjiaria (one $ ), Hydriomena autum-
ualin, JJapta bunaciilata, Asthena In teat a, Euchoeca obliterata,
IJonmlocha font is and a fine banded specimen of Leptomcris do* -lactata
( ==reniutata ). A word perhaps should be said respecting the excur¬
sions. They are palpably badly attended, and the reason would
appear that many members consider they can secure more specimens
on a dual outing or even when they are quite alone. This opinion is
doubtless well founded, but these excursions are intended to serve
another purpose as well. An exchange of views is often very beneficial
to each of the exchangers, and many a useful and interesting detail as
to how such and such insects are to be taken is often to he obtained
at such outings, provided there is a good attendance. Members will
therefore perhaps in the coming summer consider the excursions,
which are arranged for their benefit, and help to make them the real
successes they should be in a Society such as this, which is composed
of active and skilled field workers.

The following programme was carried out during the year: —

1901,

Dec.

18.

“ Observations on Early Stages of
Phijllocnutis suffusella ”

Mr. Alfred Sich,
F.E.S.

1902,

Jan.

‘ 1 Sta aropus faeyi "

Mr. A. W. Mera.

> J

21.

“ Colour Photography ” — the
Sanger- Shephird Process, with
Lantern Slides ...

Eev. C. R. N.
Burrows.

? J

Feb.

Pocket Box Exhibition

> >

J )

18.

“After Lepidoptera in British
Guiana in 1901 ”

Mr. W. J. Kaye,
F.E.S.

J J

Mar.

“ Some Considerations on the
Classification of the Sphinyidae ”

Mr. A. Bacot,
F.E.S.

,, ,, 18. “Notes on the Cfracilariadae ” ... Dr. T. A. Chap¬

man, F.E.S.

,, April 1. Exhibitionof European Rhopalocera
,, Oct. 21. Exhibition and Discussion on
Hydriomena f areata

,, Nov. 4. Discussion on the Question of
Establishment of a Central
Entomological Exchange Club.

Opened by ... ... ... Mr. F. J. Han-

bury, F.E.S.

,, ,, 18. “ An Easter Holiday in South

America”

Mr. A. F. Bayne.

TREASURER’S ACCOUNT, Dec., 1901, to Dec., 1902.

Dr. GENERAL FUND. Cr.

To Balance from 1901

.. 9

By Rent, 31st July, 1901, to

, , Subscription and

En-

31st July, 1902 . . 12

trance Fee (1903)

.. 0

, , Insurance . . 0

,, Subscriptions and

En-

, , Attendance . . . . 0

trance Fees (1902)

.. 18

,, Purchase of Bookcase

,, Subscriptions (arrears),

from J. A. Clark . . 4

1901 . .

.. 1

,, Removal of same to

,, Donation

.. 1

Society’s Rooms . . 0

,, Subscription to S.E.

Union of S.S., 1902 .. 0

,, Subscriptions to Maga-

zines . . . . . . 0

,, Lantern Expenses .. 0

,, Repairs to Bookcase . . 0

, , Printing (Syllabus,

Notices, etc.) . . . . 1

,, Stationery, Postages, etc. 1

,, Returned to Life Member-

ship Fund (advanced

1897) . 5

, , Balance in hand . . 2

£30

‘JJ

Amount of Subscriptions unpaid . . . . £4 15s. 6d.

,, considered good . . . . . . £3 Os. Od.

LIFE MEMBERSHIP FUND.

£ s. d.

To two Subscriptions . . 10 0 0
,, Returned from General

Fund (advanced 1807) 5 0 0

£15 0 0

£ s. d.

By Advance to General

Fund (1897) . . ..5 0 0

,, Advance to General

Fund (1899) . . ..5 0 0

,, Balance in hand .. 5 0 0

£15 0 0

To Balance from 1900
,, Donations
,, Sale of Copies
“ Transactions ”

PUBLICATION FUND.
£ s. d.

£ s. d.

. . 2 0 3

.. 15 10 6
of

.. 1 14 6

£19 11 3

By Printing “ Transactions ”

(1901) . 15 10 7

,, Stationery, etc. .. .. 3 8

,, Balance in hand .. 3 17 0

£19 11 3

Examined and found correct, 28th November, 1902.
London Institution, 2nd December, 1902.

C. Nicholson, lion. Treas.

H. A. Sauze )
V. Eiuc Shaw}

lion. Auditors.

PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS,

By Louis B. Prout, F.E.S.

Gentlemen,

For the fourth year in succession you have done me the honour
of electing me to the Presidency of this Society, and for the fourth

time in succession, therefore, I now appear before you with the annual
presidential address. But on the present occasion I do so with feel¬
ings somewhat different from those which I have experienced on the
previous ones, inasmuch as I am now obliged to say “ Farewell ” —
not, however, I am glad to say, to my confreres of the “ City of London
Entomological and Natural History Society,” but only to the chair
which has held me a not unwilling captive during the past four years.
Indeed, it is not without very mingled feelings that I am now vacating
the position which your unfailing courtesy and kindness have made it
so great a pleasure and so slight a burden to occupy throughout this
period, and I can assure you that no mere hasty impulse should have
allowed me to quit it, but that I find duties and engagements are so
thickening around me that I cannot conscientiously promise to give all
the time and thought which I feel every president who is worthy of
his position owes to his society. Still, I hope to continue a fairly
regular attendant at the meetings under the presidency of my worthy
successor, Mr. A. W. Mera, a very old friend of this Society, and — I
am glad to be able to add — of myself personally, a thorough and
painstaking entomologist, and a most kindhearted and genial man —
one whose natural modest and unassuming disposition has, perhaps,
prevented his becoming well known to so wide a circle of us as might
have been wished, but who certainly has not a single enemy in the
society, nor a suspicion of one, but who will, I have every confidence,
be able to guide its affairs smoothly and effectively.

Under the special circumstances wherein I appear before you this
evening, I trust you will pardon my lingering a little on the purely
personal element ; I feel that I cannot vacate the chair without
giving expression to my sense of indebtedness to all the officers and
Council for their kindly sympathy and co-operation. If I may single
out some, where all have deserved my thanks, I must mention espe¬
cially our two able and energetic secretaries, each of whom, in his own
department, has done such excellent work for the Society at large,
and in this way earned the gratitude of one who has its welfare so
much at heart as myself — to say nothing of the very cordial relations
which exist between us personally. I have indeed been fortunate in
having the co-operation of so good a reporting secretary as Mr. W. J.
Kaye, F.E.S., and not less so in that of so capable and businesslike
an organizer and corresponding secretary as Mr. S. J . Bell ; and 1
congratulate the Society, and myself as a member of it, on our good
fortune in retaining their services for the coming year.

Of statistics and matters of finance, you will have learned from
the reports of our secretaries and treasurer. It is to be regretted
that our membership-roll does not go forward with the rapidity which
might be expected from our favourable position, our exceptionally
comfortable accommodation, and, 1 think I may add, the general
interest of our meetings and the high standard of our work. But this
feeling of regret is tempered with not a little satisfaction that some
healthy “ new blood ” has been infused during the past year, and that
there are many signs of vigorous activity amongst us. When one
looks through the list of sponsors for the nomination of new members,
however, one is struck by the small number of those to whom this
important duty seems to be left, and one cannot help wondering
whether the majority of our members are really making all the effort

in their power to induce their friends to join us. I have pointed out
in previous addresses that we occupy a unique position in two or three
respects, particularly in the strength of our annual publication relatively
to the want of numerical strength in our membership-roll, but also
in the kind of specializing to which we seem to be more and more
tending, as primarily a lepidopterists’ society. But it is quite
manifest that such a position cannot be maintained without a certain
strenuousness on our part, and I would again urge you to bring the
claims of the society before the notice of all sorts and conditions of
entomologists, but perhaps especially of lepidopterists.

lou have been reminded by the secretaries that the excursions,
which are so prominent and so successful a feature in some kindred
societies, appear as a very weak point in our statistical records. I do
not know that I need dilate on the pleasure and advantage of those
occasions. I am quite aware that there is a feeling abroad in certain
quarters that the success of an excursion from a purely Natural
History point of view is almost in inverse proportion to the size of
the attendance ; but I think this was disproved, as the leader (Mr.
M . I. Cox) remarked at the time, by the most (numerically) successful
of our recent excursions — the one to Darenth a few years ago ; and
even if large numbers do sometimes militate against hard work, they
ha\e very strong compensating advantages in the direction of wider
interchange of thought and increase of general knowledge. Speaking
as a regular attendant at them for some years past, I say with con¬
fidence that I have seldom (if ever) been present at one without gaining
some new idea, or learning something new as regards localities or
methods of field work.

Of our more serious work as a society, as it is shown in the list of
papers read before us during the past year, we have no reason to feel
ashamed. It is not necessary or even desirable that I should make
any detailed reference to them now or attempt in any way to
recapitulate the matter brought before you in them. We are hoping
to have in our hands early in the new year copies of our twelfth
annual volume of “ Transactions,” and shall then be able to read
and digest them for ourselves. If I may be allowed to single out one
paper as worthy of especial mention, as showing the high place which
our Transactions are taking in entomological literature, I would refer
to Mr. Sich s excellent one on the genus Phyllocnistis, read nearly a
twehemonth ago, but doubtless well remembered by those who
heard it, as a really solid piece of work, whether from the point of
view of the literary knowledge displayed or of the author’s original
observations added thereto. I have emphasised in former addresses
the importance of our combining these two factors in our work — an
acquaintance with what has been done already, as made known in
entomological literature or by correspondence and communion with
entomologists, and an aptitude for adding to that by our own personal
research. Need I add that our Natural History Societies, with their
meetings and their libraries, furnish just such aid as is required for
the former of these factors, and consequently just such stimulus as is
required for the latter.

The year 1902 does not seem to have been so eventful in the ento¬
mological world generally as some other years which 1 can remember ;
at least, in bringing it hastily under review, I am not struck by many

prominently outstanding features. In our literature we do not find
any of the great biological or taxonomic works of which we had so
many thrust upon our notice a few years ago, and which proved so
fruitful in raising discussions and controversies on evolution and its
effects upon classification; nor have we even had, in 1902, a“ Stau-
dinger s Cataloy ’ or a “ Kirby’s Cataloyue ” to set us disputing on
the principles of nomenclature. I therefore intend to take as my
theme, for the few minutes in which I propose further to weary you
with this address, a matter suggested not by literature but by my own
experience of the very abnormal summer through which we have just
passed. I want to say a few words, namely, on the extraordinary
fluctuations of insect abundance from time to time, and — though I fear
I am on very dangerous ground here — the correct attitude of ento¬
mologists towards the “over-collecting ” question.

The experience to which I have alluded, which has led me up to
this line of thought, need not be very fully recounted, especially as
brief reports at different meetings have already given you some idea of
it. I can neither say, as many of my correspondents are writing to
me, that the season has been an unmitigatedly bad one for lepidoptera,
nor can I say that it has been, on the whole, a really satisfactory one.
“ Sugaring,” upon which so many of us rely for our success — espe¬
cially numerically — has been very generally a failure, although with
some notable exceptions. Butterflies and other sun-loving species have
not been very much in evidence, and although this is largely because
entomologists have experienced so little favourable weather "for work¬
ing them, yet I think in some cases there has probably been a real
paucity of them. Especially is this likely to have been the case with
those whose lame also require warmth and sunshine, such as the
genus Melitaea. Reference has more than once been made at our meet¬
ings to the troubles and disappointments which we have met with in
our endeavours to rear M. ciniria. Again, the season seems to have
been but a poor one for immigrants — the genus Eurymus, Sesia
(Macroylossmn) stellatarum , Ayrius convolvuli, Ayrotis saucia, etc., etc. —
compared with several of its immediate predecessors. But, as a set¬
off against these deficiencies, we find a few species have been more
than normally abundant. My own success at Forres in taking a nice
series of Plusia bractea led me to fancy it must be an extra favourable
year for this much-coveted insect, and I since find this abundantly
confirmed by reports from Ireland. I also learn from correspondents
in widely-separated localities — Aberdeen, Isle of Man, and Dor¬
setshire — that it has been an abnormally good season for Apomphyla
niyra. As for A. australis, I have never seen it in such abundance at
Sandown as was the case at the beginning of this past September, and
my experience of the locality extends over some twelve or thirteen
years. It is usually a comparatively scarce species there, but this year
one could meet with 90 or 40, sometimes even more, on a single round
of the sugar, and its abundance was not confined to a single night, as
I have sometimes found to be the case with certain Nocture, hut
continued for several evenings in succession.

I wish I could enlighten you as to the actual causes of this sporadic
appearance of lepidoptera in exceptional numbers. Of course, it is
very easy to theorise with a greater or less degree of plausibility, and
such views as that the causes are climatic, that a large number of their

pupae go over several years until a favourable season arises, that they
are generally kept in check by parasites and only occasionally get the
upper hand, or that they are occasionally augmented by immigration,
are among the commonplaces of entomology. None of these factors
which I have mentioned are likely to be altogether inconsiderable, and
some, at least, have been in a measure raised out of the realm of mere
theory into that of demonstrated fact ; but the difficulty, to the thought¬
ful mind, is that they do not go back to first causes, as, for instance,
those which regulate the migrations, or those which regulate the
balance between parasites and their hosts. I suppose we must not be
surprised at this difficulty in getting to the very heart of the problems,
however dissatisfied we may be at our inability to lay out for ourselves
a clear and comprehensive theoretical scheme ; no one can have
thought seriously for five minutes over the operations of natural
selection, and the inter-relations between the various organisms and
forces of organic (and even of inorganic) nature, without having
realised how excessively complicated they are, and how multifarious
the factors may well be which make for the survival or the dominance
of this or that individual form.

Perhaps all that we can venture to assert at all dogmatically is that
a particular species will be abundant just when and where there is
room for it, in the so-called “ economy of nature.” But this assertion
is little better than a begging of the question, as it does not attempt
to show what special concatenation of circumstances will open up the
path or clear the way for a species, so to speak, at this or that period.
It has been generally remarked, and is plausible enough, that an in¬
crease of the right foodplant, or the introduction of the foodplant in
a new locality, has a marked influence on the increase or spread of the
species thus provided with the needful pabulum. Even such an old-
fashioned entomologist as Newman, in his British Moths, emphasizes
the correlation between the cultivation of turnips and the increase of
that pest of the farmer (but pet of the student of variation), A<irotis
seaetum. Probably we can all add examples from our own experi¬
ence. I myself have noticed the fluctuations in the commonness or
scarcity of the pretty little Geometrid Pernoniaalcheinillata in accord¬
ance with those of its somewhat erratic foodplant, Galeojisis tetrahit
(common hemp-nettle). Our botany books tell us that this is a
common weed, and from the little acquaintance which I have of
Scotland I should say that that is so indeed in the North ; but at
Sandown it is, in my experience, as I have just described it, a “ some¬
what erratic ” plant. Some seasons I have hunted round the hedges
on the farm fields and hardly found a scrap, while in other years it
is in absolute profusion in its favourite fields. Now in those years
when it is scarce, one might be inclined to expect that the little which
was available would be crowded with larva) of /’. alchemillata — just as
we do indeed often find, in the case of an isolated buckthorn, that
there is an excellent chance of reaping a big harvest of ('alias rhanmi
lame ; but in the case under notice, 1 have by no means found this
so, but on the contrary have even fancied that the lame were /irajiar-
tionalhj Scarce in the years of dearth of the Ualenpsis, while they
certainly abound in its years of plenty, so that one cannot help think¬
ing that there is a vital connection, though of course it might amount
to nothing more than that the seasonal circumstances which favoured

the one had become, through the operation of natural selection,
identical with those which favoured the other.

But I will descend from the region of abstruse speculations, which
may not interest those of you whose mental activities run in other
directions, and will venture to give you one or two of the thoughts
which have been the outcome of the creed which 1 have enunciated
when I said that “ a particular species will be abundant just when and
where therein room for it.” Not many years ago I was an uncompro¬
mising opponent of the experiments which seem so entertaining to a
good many lepidopterists — of the naturalisation of species in new
localities. I even characterised such a proceeding, without the
fullest publicity, as “ an acted lie against scientific knowledge.”
(Knt. Rev. viii ., p. 278). I may as well say frankly that I have almost
entirely abandoned that position, and though I have no taste myself
for transplantation experiments, I think they are generally quite harm¬
less, although I would still urge entomologists to abstain from plant¬
ing marked local varieties or aberrations in new localities ; for in¬
stance, if one of you put down some thousands of pup® of Manchester
doubledayaria in our London suburbs without publicly announcing the
fact, you may seriously vitiate the statistics which the “Evolution
Committee ” of the Royal Society is endeavouring to collect. But in
other cases — i.e., the attempt to establish a new species in a particular
locality — the reasons which convince me that it is generally harmless
from the scientific point of view rest almost entirely upon the view
which I have just put forth ; if there is not room for the new comer
(and this usually proves the case) the experiment will fail — witness
the hundreds of unsuccessful attempts to establish Porthetria dispar
in various parts of this country ; and if there is room for it, its occu¬
pation of the spot will not upset any important scientific fact of
distribution, for it is always probable that the same result might
have been or might be brought about by natural migration, chance
introduction, or other agencies apart entirely from the volition of
man. For instance, it matters very little how Plusia moneta has
become established in England, whether through accidental or
intentional introduction ; the fact that it is capable of breeding and
multiplying here is unimpaired whichever be the cause. Perhaps,
however, I ought not to pass away from this subject without remind¬
ing you that whilst such proceedings may be free from scientific
danger, they require the exercise of some judgment and discretion if
we want to avoid a serious economic menace ; none of you would
desire, for the sake of the gratified vanity which might come of a
successfully carried-out experiment, to risk a repetition of the sad
story of the Gypsy Moth in America.

The reverse aspect of this question of the occupation by a
particular species of any locality where there is room for it, is the one
to which I referred in the early part of my address as “ dangerous
ground ”- — the over-collecting question and our attitude towards it.
We all know that there is such a thing, and that species have
occasionally been almost wiped out of a particular area through the
ignorant greed or misguied energy of a few collectors ; let us all agree,
then, if we must err at all, to err on the safe side of over-abstemious¬
ness. But I have been so often amused — and occasionally even
disgusted — at the absurdly superficial views which frequently obtain

on this question that, having cleared my conscience by the above
advice, I am not afraid to give you my ideas upon it. Surely if the
position which I have taken is anywhere near the true one, the
numerical aspect really does not enter into the question at all. Let
me explain what I mean. Sometimes we read, or hear announced at
a meeting, that this or that local or scarce species was unusually
abundant at such-and-such a time and place, and that the writer or
speaker “ had no difficulty in collecting a thousand specimens.”
Immediately the unthinking among us hold up our hands in pious
horror, and perhaps threaten to excommunicate the unfortunate
“ exterminator.” We turn over the next page (or listen to the next
speaker, as the case may be) and learn that so-and-so “ was very scarce
this season ; it cost me almost incessant hard work during the time it
was out to secure a dozen examples.” Probably we pass over the
record without criticism, or we sympathise with the collector on his
failure, or even congratulate him on his perseverance. But which
of the two, think you, was the real “ over-collector,” assuming that it
lay within the power of either to come under this stigma ? Surely if
it be possible to do permanent mischief to a particular species at all,
it is by persecuting it when it is at its weakest, not by taking large
numbers when it is at its zenith. Surely the state of the case is as
mathematically demonstrable as is that of “ Mullerian Mimicry,” which
its ingenious expounder has worked out so statistically.

Let us suppose the case of a moth with whose resting habits a cer¬
tain local collector is really well acquainted, so that he stands a good
chance, if diligent enough, of finding a good percentage of the speci¬
mens which successfully complete their metamorphoses in his district.
Let us suppose, further, that, on account of the action of other than
human enemies, this species is liable to very great fluctuations in point
of number. Our collector, we will say, is able to give sufficient time
to hunting it to be able to secure, on an average, just 50 per cent, of
the total occurring. Now, the year 1002, perhaps, was a very bad year
for it, and only 20 specimens from this little colony reached maturity.
Of these our entomologist takes ten, most or all of them freshly
emerged — there are several species which are best found at rest at this
period. Consequently he only leaves ten, some of which may fall a
prey to bats, or meet with one or another of the untold casualties which
befall the moth tribe. It is just possible that in the long run so few
impregnated females will have escaped for oviposition that the colony-
unless speedily reinforced by immigration — may entirely work itself
out in a generation or two by a too close inbreeding. But the year
1901 was as favourable for the species as 1902 was the reverse ; 2.000
came to maturity, and again our friend got his usual percentage. This,
and not any suspicion of “over-collecting,” explains his abnormal
“ bag ” of i,000, but we must not lose sight of the fact that he has
also left another thousand to “ be fruitful and multiply and replenish
the earth.” If the foregoing be even approximately the true statis¬
tical basis of the question, it follows, logically, that our theory of over¬
collecting ought to be that it bears an exact ratio to the amount of
hard work (of course assuming that it be also well-directed and suc¬
cessful work) applied to the quest by the entomologist.

1 have called attention to this matter solely in order to defend some
quite innocent members of our brotherhood from thoughtless — though

undoubtedly well-meaning — attacks on the part of those who have
taken up arms against the ruthless “ exterminator.” In these days
of statistical study of variation, &c., it is absolutely unavoidable that
large series should be obtained from restricted localties, and that
there should be, consequently, a large sacrifice of insect life. On the
other hand, no lover of scientific research would wish to risk the ex¬
termination of a single species, nor would he dream of applying those
wanton methods of work which constitute the real “ over-collecting ”
and one or two of which I have heard exposed in this room by my
illustrious predecessor in the chair — for example, the collecting in
sacks of every rosebud in a certain small wood at the time when the
lame of Plati/ptilia rhododactijla were feeding, and the consequent
extirpation of this local species there — or, at least, its entire disappear¬
ance for a considerable number of years. It is such actions as this
which have naturally disgusted us, and given us an abhorrence of the
very mention of large numbers, which abhorrence, perhaps, threatens
to carry us too far — although I have not yet met with the entomolo¬
gist who is quite so undiscriminating as to criticise the records which
are published from time to time of the collection of thousands of lame
or pupa) of Arctia caia or Spilote prossluanata with a view to variety
breeding.

I hope I have said enough to give food for some reflection, and it
now only remains to me to introduce to you my good friend and suc¬
cessor, Mr. A. W. Mera, and to wish continued and increasing health
and prosperity to the City of London Entomological and Natural
History Society.

PAPERS READ BEFORE THE SOCIETY.

OBSERVATIONS ON THE EARLY STAGES OF PHYLLOCNISTIS

SUFFUSELLA, ZELL

(Read December 17th, 1901, by Alfred SICH, F.E.S.)

Bibliography. — The earliest notice I can find of this little insect
is in the Naturforscher-', written indeed by one of the old masters of
entomology, Goeze. He says ( Natf. ., 14th St., p. 103, Tab. V.,
Figs. 1-8) in an article entitled “ Von der Oekonomie besonderer
Minirwiirmer in den glatten Pappelbliittern ” : On the 14th July,
1774, I discovered what I first took to be slime left by a snail on a
poplar leaf.” On examining other leaves he finds they are mines,
and at their termination sees the “graves.” He soon finds a little
pale-yellow7 worm, on vdiich he counts twelve rings besides the head
and tail. He is puzzled that there is no excrement in the mines, and
wonders whether he has a moth, a fiy, or a beetle before him. After
some trouble he succeeds in rearing from the worms and their graves
a beautiful little butterfly with veritable scales. Among the score of
authors who mention this moth, Goeze is the only one who gives a
practical hint on rearing it. He says, cut off the tw'igs (not the leaves
only), and keep them in a bottle wdth water, or the little creatures will
dry up. He says the moth’s tongue remains stiff, like the proboscis
of a bug. It is not, however, so in these days. Goeze gives eight
figures, but they are not of much account. He appears to have had
both Phyllocnistis mfmella and /'. sor/iayeniella before him, as he says
some moths have four and some five dark streaks on the wing. I
cannot find that he gives the moth any name. It is, with him, the
Miner of the Smooth Poplar Leaf.

In 1839 Zeller, in his famous paper Yersueli finer naturyeiniissrn
Kintheilmnj tier Schaben, I describes, under the genus Ojmsteya, a species
which he calls saliyna, and which he says may be taken in the neigh¬
bourhood of willows and poplar trees, in the leaves of which the larva
mines.

Writing in the his of 1846 (p. 299) Madame Lienig also mentions
(). saliyna as an inhabitant of Livonia and Curland. In the same
journal, the following year (Isis, 1817, p. 894) Zeller describes a new
species of Oyosteya under the name of snffnsella ; but of this descrip¬
tion more later. A year afterwards Zeller, in the Linnaea Pntmno-
layica (1848, tab. II. and III., fig. 264), founded the genus / ‘hyllomistis,
with the two species suffnsella and saliyna. In seven pages he gives
a fair account of the larva, pupa, and mines. His description of the
species and varieties will be again referred to.

* Halle, 1774-1894.
f Isis, von Oken, 1839, p. 214.

We now come to a very interesting account written by Heeger, as
one of his “ Beitriige zur Schmetterlingskunde,” and published in the
Sitznnysber. d. Kan. Acad. d. Wissenschaft for 1852 (ix., p. 278). He
calls the insect Oposteya trernnlella, Fischer v. Roslerstamm, but there
is not the slightest doubt that it is the same insect as Zeller’s Phylloc-
nntn stiff usella. In fact, he writes on the plate accompanying the
article, after the word Oposteya, the word Phjllocnites, in brackets, by
way, I suppose, of correcting Zeller’s Greek. He says that the Italian
poplar is the foodplant ; that the larva has two processes on what we
now call the eighth and ninth abdominal segments, and the moth has
four black streaks on the costa; all of which statements point to
P. snf usella. He gives twelve figures, of which one or two are very
good : in any case, they leave one in no doubt as to what species he
was discussing, except, perhaps, his figure of the venation, but this
may be easily accounted for. No one studying Phyllocnistis can afford
to overlook Heeger’s paper, to which I shall frequently again refer.
Herrich- Schaffer (Bearb. d. Schtn. v. Fait., v.,p. 841, tab. 109, fig. 871)
gives the first coloured figure of the species and a short description.

We now come to Stainton, the father of British microlepidop-
terists, but in this particular genus he can scarcely be considered to
shine with his usual brightness. In the lnsecta Britannica (p. 285)
he gives, I think, the best description of the imago of P. stiff usella
that can be found. In the Fntomoloyist’s Animal for 1856 (p. 59) he
mentioned finding the larvae numerous on aspens at Mickleham at the
beginning of August. In the previous year they had been met with
in Norfolk (Knt. Ann. 1855, 2nd ed., p. 81). The first mention by
Stainton of suffinella is made, I think, however, in the Zooloyist for
1848, in his supplementary paper on the British Aryyromiyes, but it is
unimportant. In his Manual (p. 424) he again describes the species
in 1859. In a paper read at Oxford and published in the Entomolo-
yist's Weekly Intelligencer, July, 1860 (viii., p. 127), he makes some
very extraordinary statements concerning the larva. He says : —
“ Another peculiarity of this larva is that it never moults ; its skin is,
apparently, of so elastic a nature that it grows with the larva.” In
1856 Professor Frey makes some interesting remarks in his work on
the Swiss Microlepidoptera (Tin. and Pter. Sclureiz, p. 315), and again
notices the species in his Lepidapteren der Schweiz in 1880. In 1866
Rossler (Jahrb. d. Xass. ver. f. Xatnrk., xix.-xx., p. 389 ; see also 2nd
ed. Jahrg. xxxiii.-xxxiv.) notices, in his list of Nassau Lepidoptera,
that the imago hibernates in moss or leaves. The moth is again de¬
scribed in Heinemann and Wocke’s “ Schmetterlinge Deutschlands
und der Schweiz ” (Band ii, Heft, ii., p. 708), in some remarks on
the family Phyllocnistidae, and attention is called to the “ vorstehende,”
or projecting palpi, though in the diagnosis of the genus they are
described as drooping. But drooping, as Liiders remarks, only applies
to the dead specimen. The account of this moth given in Snellen
van Vollenhoven’s “ Nederlandsche Insecten ” (Sepp, 2nd series,
vol. iii., p. 177 [1877], pi. 33, fig. 1-20) is an excellent one, and it is
accompanied by a good series of figures. Albania, who, I believe, is
the writer, refers to Heeger and Goeze, besides others, showing that
he did not ignore the previous literature of the subject, as some writers
are in the habit of doing. He describes the eggs, mentioning the
sculpture, the mining larva, and the spinning stage, commenting on

the great change in appearance. He evidently had noticed both
P. miff'ii sella and sorhai/eniella, as he says those moths marked with
dark patches are much commoner than those in which the spots are
wanting, and he gives both aspen and poplar as foodplants. Speaking
of the August brood, he says that a part yield the moth in September,
while another part pass the winter as pupae. In favourable years, he
remarks, one still finds larvae in November, which pupate before
winter, though many of them die of frost.

In his “ Lepidoptera of Asia Minor ” (Lep. Fauna Kleinasiens, ii.,
p. 257), published at St. Petersburg in 1880, Staudinger states, he
found mines, doubtless of this species, in white poplar, in the valley
of the Kerasderebach. This is the first mention of the species — if it
be si iff) i sella, by the way — feeeding in white poplar. Drs. Steudel and
E. Hofmann, in a list of Wurtemberg Tineina (Jahreshefte <1. Yer. f.
rated. Xaturh. in Wiirtem., xxxviii., pp. 145-162) strike a true note
when they say of P. stiff ttsella, “ throughout the summer among pop¬
lars.” They are, too, the first to notice that the mines in Populus
t rein nla present an especially white appearance. They also mention
Populus alba as a foodplant.

Sorhagen, in his “ Kleinschmetterlinge der Mark Brandenburg ”
(p. 291, 1886), makes some erroneous statements on the species, the
most flagrant of which is that the larva comes out of the mine to make
its cocoon. In 1887 August Hoffmann (Stett. ent. Frit., xlviii., p. 307)
calls attention to the peculiar last larval stage, likening it to that which
occurs in certain psychids. He gives a fair description of the larva
and prepupal form.

By far the most detailed description of the imago, larva, and pupa
we find, as we should expect, in the last published matter on the sub¬
ject. Last year Liiders, in his “ Beitrag z. Kennt. d. Lep. Gatt.
Phyllocnistis” (Jahresh. Reahchnle in St. Pauli, Hamburg, 1900), suc¬
cessfully establishes his new species J\ sorhatjeniella. He described
the imagines, body, wings, limbs, scales, in very minute fashion, and
the earlier stages in the same way, as far as he appears to know
them. One is, however, rather disappointed to find that he appeared
not to have studied the previous literature of the subject to any extent.
The paper is accompanied by some very good plain plates. The figures
are usually excellent, but those of the larva or larval details are
certainly poor.

The last mention I can find of this moth is in Tutt’s “ Practical
Hints ” (i., p. 70, 1901), but this is not very extensive.

I have omitted one or two purely faunistic references, but Reutti
(1898) and Stange (1899) I have not yet had the opportunity of
consulting.

Synonomy. — In the his of Oken for the year 1889 (p. 214), Zeller,
in that famous paper “ Versuch einer naturgemiissen Eintheilung der
Schaben,” described under the genus Oposteija, Zell., a small moth
which he named salii/na. This description, however, is so insufficient
that but for Zeller’s subsequent writings we should still be somewhat
in the dark as to which insect lie intended the description to apply to.
For, though the name saliyna points, of course, to the willow fre¬
quenting species, he makes no mention of the characteristic lines, and
he gives both willow and poplar as the foodplants. Again, in the his
for 1847 (p. 894), Zeller describes, in a paper on the insects he met

SJS™? a V1Slfc t0 fta.y,’ a new sPecies of 0 paste,, a which he names

hnnrTnfV'T a ferm!ve near Lake ASnano> in ^e neighbour-
ood of Naples. In the Latin diagnosis he writes “ Alis anteriori-

us latiusculis, nitidis albis, Jiavido sufusis " = anterior wings rather

broader, shining white suffused with yello.e. In the German descrip-

rl°n> which foUows, he says, “Most nearly allied to O paste,, a sultana.

lead and thorax yellow instead of silver white. The forewings are

somewhat broader, their white colour is very thinly suffused with yellow',

east of all on the costa. In the middle of the wing is a cloudy

brownish spot, without any sharp margin ; near the base under the fold

essential1 fffhade' bre?dth of the wings appears to be the most
essential difference. I he colour may he individual or climatic.”

Ihis is the earliest description we have of sufusella, and it seems
quite clear that Zeller had in his mind, when he named the species,
not the cloudy patches on the forewings but the yellow tint suffused
over the whole insect. The words flavido sufusis are sufficiently dis¬
tinctive. This form then, in which the head, thorax, and fore wings
aie suffused with yellow, becomes the type of the species. It must, I
think, be a rather uncommon form, as it is not often mentioned in
descriptions of the species. Heinemann says (Schm. Deutsch., Tineina
p. / 08) , More rarely suffused with yellow.”

I suggest, by way of convenience, calling the prevalent white form
vanety nebulella, in allusion to the dark grey clouds on the forewin^s

which are, of course more conspicuous on a white than on a yellow’
ground. J

In the \ Lvnnaea Entomoloyica for 1848 (pp. 264-272), Zeller, havum
recognised that his two species which he had previously described as
belonging to the genus O paste, , a had, in reality, little in common with
that genus, founded his genus Phyllocnistis, characterising it by the
smooth head, small eyecaps, rather short wings, presence of labial
palpi and the venation, which, by the way, is very different from that
ot Oposteya In the new genus he placed the two species salty na and
stiff ttsella. Under salty na he declares that he had previously— in the
Ists, 1839— confused two species under this name, but now he sepa¬
rates out the willow- frequenting species, describing its chief characters
the narrower wings and the pair of darker longitudinal streaks from
the base along the centre of the forewing. For this he retains the
name saliyna, which, he says, is in itself sufficient to show of what
species he was thinking when he first described it.

In describing the poplar species, Zeller ignores his own description
ot stiff ttsella, published, as we have seen, in the Isis for 1847 and
brings forward as the type a form in which the cloudy patches of the
forewings are absent. In this description he adds two varieties ; the
first he calls the common variety h., and characterises it as having a
suffused spot on the disc of the wing, and in well-marked specimens
a second one behind the transverse fascia, and a third at the base.
This var. b. is, then, the common form, with fuscous clouds, which I
call nebulella. The second, var. c., Zeller diagnoses as alis' ant. fta-
vescenti-sufusis, and states that he took a single specimen at the Agnano
lake. This, then, is the above-mentioned yellow form, which° as I
have shown, is the earliest described form of P. sufusella, and’ must
therefore be the type. The cloudless form, which ' Zeller ’made here
his type, is, 52 years afterwards, successfully claimed by Liiders as a

new aspen-feeding species, which he names sorhayeniclta, and, at the
same time, he takes Zeller’s var. b. (the clouded form) as the type of
the species mjfu&ella. Liiders appear to hold that the type of a species
is the most abundant form. This may be so of the natural type, but
it is usually considered that an author’s type is the form first described
under the distinguishing specific name.

The synonomy, therefore, would run : —

Oposteya saliyna (pro parte), Zeller, 1839.

Oposteya stiff usella, Zeller, 1847.

Phyllocnhtia suff'usella, var. c., Zeller, 1848.

Oposteya (Phyttocnites) tremulella (Fisch., M. S.), Heeger, 1852.

One word about Fischer’s (or Herrich- Schaffer’s) Oposteya tremu-
lella. The name, as far as appears to be known, is only found in the
“ Schlesischer Tauschverein fiir Schmetterlinge ” (Benefit iv., p. 21,
1843), but as the name alone is mentioned, without any description or
reference, it must be taken, I suppose, as a nomen nudum. Should,
however, a description turn up we may have to substitute tremulella
for one of the other specific names— perhaps for sorhayeniella, the
aspen-feeder.

Ovum. — As the creature commences its own separate existence as
soon as the egg is laid, that moment in its life-cycle may be taken as
the starting point.

The ovum, then, is deposited on the leaves of at least three species
of poplar — Populus niyra, IJ. pyramid alls, and P.bahamifera.

The young, somewhat sticky, or viscid leaves are usually chosen.
In some instances I have seen leaves selected which were so lately
in the bud that the margins were still rolled. The greater proportion
of the ova is laid on the upper surface of the leaf, but they may very
frequently be found adhering to the lower surface. It may be that the
moth finds it easier to place the egg while reposing on the surface than
while clinging to the under surface. From a larval point of view, the
upper surface may be preferable, on account of the, possibly, more suit¬
able cell formation, and on account of the ribs and veins being less
prominent, and, therefore, more easily passed over in the course of
mining. The under surface, however, perhaps, has the following ad¬
vantages : — The larva is better sheltered from either hot sun or cold
rain, and less exposed to the attacks of its enemies.

The situation most frequently selected is a point almost touching
the mid-rib, and distant about one-third the length of the leaf from
the apex. Sometimes the egg is placed close to a lateral vein, more
rarely on the plain surface between two veins. I have never seen the
egg on the extreme edge of the leaf, neither on the petiole nor on the
bark of the twigs. The ovum is laid singly, though I have found two
side by side, but not in contact. One egg on each surface of the leaf
appears to be the best possible, though such large leaves as we some¬
times find on the balsam poplar can accommodate two larva' on each
surface. On one occasion l found five eggs on one very small leaf of
a Lombardy poplar, but even then they were all laid separately, not
packed side by side like the ova of ( iracilaria syrinyella, nor imbri¬
cated like those of 1 ponomeuta nymtipuuctatus, both of which species
begin life by mining into the leaves of their respective foodplants.

The ova of Phyllocnistis stiff usella, though minute, are really con¬
spicuous, especially when new, owing to the milk-white colour, which

shows well in contrast to the greenish yellow tint of the young leaves
to which they are attached. The ovum is, as we should expect, of the flat
type, but it has evidently, from its fairly regular shape and slight sculp¬
turing, made some advance on the primitive form of the lepidopterous
ovum. When laid on a flat surface it is convex in shape, ovoid in out¬
line, one end not being perceptibly narrower than the other. The egg
is large, I think, for the size of the moth, the longer axis being about
0-4mm. in length, the shorter 025mm.; the height of the egg is
about O'lmm. The sculpture, which is sometimes difficult to see,
consists of raised lines running irregularly over the surface, occasion¬
ally forming hexagonal cells. In some ova I have noticed a slight
prominence at one end ; this may be the micropyle. Though I have
not actually seen the micropyle, I think there can be no doubt about
the egg being of the flat type, as I have stated. The shell is delicate,
and has a rather smooth appearance when new, but becomes loosely
wrinkled before the larva hatches out. The colour is silvery grey
with a bluish tinge, the egg appearing milky to the eye, but under a
lens sufficiently transparent to admit of the veinlets of the leaf being
clearly traced beneath the shell.

A certain time before hatching the egg loses its milkiness, and the
shell, becoming transparent, displays the young larva coiled up in the
interior. The head, which is very large, occupies almost the anterior
half of the egg. The body, following the contour of the egg, is bent
round, the posterior abdominal segments resting on (that is, above)
the left lobe of the larval head. The jaws and muscles of the head
are very conspicuous, owing to their dark amber colour. The dorsal
vessel is plainly seen, occupying the centre of the dorsal area from the
second thoracic to the fifth abdominal segment, the larva lying dorsum
uppermost in the egg. The larva at this period is practically colour¬
less, but at first sight it appears green, on account of the colour of the
leaf on which the egg rests showing through the transparent body of
the little caterpillar.

Larva. — On examining a larva taken from the egg just before
hatching, the first things to strike the observer are the size and great
prominence of the amber-coloured jaws and the strength of the muscles
which control their movements. These portions of the head remain,
indeed, the most conspicuous parts of the larva throughout the three
mining or feeding stages. The head is wide and very flat ; in profile
wedge-shaped, not unlike the head of a Nepticulid larva ; posterior
portion embedded in the prothorax. The clypeus is wide, lobes rather
narrow, not meeting above. Antennae large, apparently three-jointed,
terminating in two points, of which the outer is the larger. Just
below the antennae two small hemispheres are visible. These are,
doubtless, ocelli. The bi-lobed labrum is large, and closely covered
with short bristles, and thrust forward in front of the head in a marked
manner. Below the labrum are the very large mandibles, each one
consisting of a strong, curved outer tooth, attached to an inner ser¬
rated blade. When at rest the blades of the mandibles slightly over¬
lap. Below the mandibles the labium is situated. It is also furnished
with bristles, and is more clearly bilobed than the labrum. To the
bases of the mandibles are attached very strong tendons, two branches
to each mandible, the inner running beside the oesophagus and the
outer passing under the lobes of the head into the prothorax, where

they take a somewhat sudden turn outwards, and terminate in root¬
like points of attachment. The segments of the thorax and abdomen
are distinctly marked off from each other, the ninth equally so from
the tenth. They are much flattened ventrally and flattened dorsally.
The prothorax is wider than the head, the meso- and meta-thorax
tapering down to meet the much narrower abdomen, which, taken
as a whole, is decidedly spindle-shaped. The second, third, and
fourth abdominal segments gradually increase in width, while the
rest narrow down to the thimble-shaped tenth segment. No anal flap
is visible, but the tenth abdominal segment shows a sulcus, which
foreshadows the bifid termination of the later stages. In the lame of
this stage I examined I could find no trace of legs, prolegs, nor of the
fleshy processes which afterwards appear on certain of the segments.
Neither could I discover a single tubercle nor bristle on any part of
the larva, except those mentioned in describing the head. Even the
antenme have no bristles.

I am unable to state the duration of the egg stage, but fancy it is
about ten days in warm weather. On hatching, the larva pierces the
base of the eggshell and the epidermis of the leaf lying immediately
below the eggshell. It, at the same time, begins to feed on the
juices of the leaf, mining its way, in about two hours, under the egg¬
shell into the leaf, thus never coming in contact with the outer atmo¬
sphere. The eggshell is not eaten by the larva, neither is it filled with
excrement, like that of a Nepticulid. It therefore collapses after a time,
but generally remains adherent to the leaf, and its oval outline may
usually be traced even in quite old mines. Heeger makes the curious
statement that the larva comes out of the egg, and, after harden¬
ing itself in the air, enters the leaf. Possibly he noticed that the leaf
cuticle in front of the egg was often broken, and imagined the larva
entered there. For the next two or three days the larva has nothing
to do but to eat, or, more properly speaking, to drink up the juice
which it liberates from the leaf cells. To obtain sufficient juice for
its requirements during this time it has to mine a space about two
inches long by inch wide. By the time this is accomplished the
larva has much altered in shape, owing to the thorax, which in the
egg was laterally compressed, developing to a width of at least three
times that of the head. The mesothorax is now the widest part of
the larva. The first abdominal segment is still very narrow, and the
tenth retains much of its former size. In profile the thorax forms a
kind of hump, and the abdominal segments gradually taper away.
The head, remaining its old size, does not any longer appear so dis¬
proportionately large. The little larva, for it is not quite 1mm. in
length, now rests in the mine for about twenty hours, after which
period the first ecdysis takes place. Unfortunately, I have never
actually seen the process begun. I believe the old skin splits across
the mesothorax, the widest part, and the larva, withdrawing its head
from the old skin, immediately begins feeding, mining a little to one
side of the old head, which remains wedged in one side of the mine,
where it may still be found weeks afterwards. As the larva continues
its progress it withdraws the abdomen from the old skin, which, being
exceedingly flimsy, is soon lost to view. The larva has now entered
on its second stadium, and unlike many “ micro ” larva;, continues its
mining habits as before, but it, naturally, makes a somewhat wider

mine. In appearance it is very much changed. It forms a link be*
ween the first and second instars, resembling the young larva in the
form of the anterior segments, and the older larva in that of the
posterior, lhe head remains practically the same in appearance,
ine thorax is not quite so wide in comparison with the rest of the
o y, as it is in the first stage. Certain of the abdominal segments,
1 think from the second to the seventh, have on each side a papilla
directed upwards and backwards. The eighth abdominal has, instead,
a fleshy coneon each side, if not two ; the ninth, which is very narrow,
is similarly furnished ; the tenth is very remarkable, being flat, very
narrow, very long, and terminating in two points. In this stage, also,
the prothoracic shield first appears. After feeding for two and a half
or three days, the larva again rests in the mine to undergo the second
mou . he process is accomplished in a similar manner to that
above described, except that we notice that the prothorax, with dark
shield, comes off attached to the head. The larva now enters upon
a very important stage in its life-history, for it is in this third stage
that by far the greatest amount of material is assimilated by the larva,
and any deficiency of vigour during this stage cannot afterwards he
made good. Almost at the commencement of this period the larva
causes the mine to assume its wide, ribband-like, glistening, charac¬
teristic appearance. Hitherto the slender mine might easily’ be mis¬
taken for that of a young Gracilaria, but now the hungry larva mines
right and left on each side as well as directly forward,' keeping, how¬
ever, always on the surface of the parenchyma, and the results that
it leaves behind it the special type of mine peculiar to Phyllmmti*.
As the larva only consumes the fluid contents of certain cells, never,
when quite healthy, any of the more solid portions of the leaf, it re¬
quires to mine over a considerable area before obtaining sufficient
nourishment to bring it to perfection. The slender portion of the
mine formed during the first and second stadia is usually about four
to five inches in length, but the wider part, cut during the third stage,
runs to a length of sixteen inches or more, so that a healthy normal
mine is, when completed, usually not less than twenty inches in length.
Yet the small creature that traverses this distance at the rate of three
inches a day has no feet. The duration of the third stage is about
five days, at the end of which period the larva has generally mined its
way to the edge of the leaf. It now continues the mine parallel with
the leaf edge for a space equal to its own length, and of an elongate
oval form. In this space it subsequently forms its cocoon. In this,
the last feeding stage, the larva attains the length of over 5mm!
The wide, flat head, with its prominent wheel-like jaws, bears the
same characteristics as in the two previous stages, but is larger. The
prothorax now bears a distinct dark brown or blackish mark placed
transversely on the dorsal posterior portion. This mark is, however,
entirely wanting, as regards the colour, in those lame which mine on
the underside of the leaf, except in very rare instances when the under
side is exposed to the light. When present it forms, together with the
amber mouth-parts, by far the most conspicuous parts of the larva.
The dorsal vessel is yellowish, often becoming greenish towards the
posterior half. The rest of the body might almost be described as
colourless. It shows, however, a pale bluish grey when placed against
a white background. The segmental incisions are very well marked,

except between the ninth and tenth. Compared with the previous
stages, the larva is now more cylindrical, the prothorax being about
twice the width of the head, mesothorax rather wider, and metathorax
rather narrower. The first abdominal segment is very narrow still,
the following segments increase in size to the fourth, which is the
widest. Then they decrease gradually to the eighth. The ninth is
very much narrower than the eighth and the tenth, half the width of
the ninth and very long, terminating in two long points. If viewed
in profile the head appears long, wedge-shaped, and partly retractile in
the prothorax, which is much wider and deeper than the head. The
segments gradually increase in depth to the second abdominal, and
then slowly taper right away to the end of the terminal forks. The
skin is very delicate and elastic, showing soft wrinkles whenever the
larva moves about. The dorsum of the larva is fairly smooth, but
there are wride lateral ridges ; the venter is also rather smooth, though
it shows certain depressions. In the lateral ridges the very small
spiracles are deeply embedded. They are very difficult to observe, but
if we take a killed larva, cut it in half, and carefully roll out the con¬
tents of the skin, we can easily see the tracheal tubes and the branches
from them to the spiracles. From the lateral ridges rise on certain of
the abdominal segments — Liiders says from the first to seventh — small
fleshy cones, which appear to be retractile. While the larva is in the
mine these points may be seen in contact with the leaf cuticle above
them. The eighth and ninth abdominal segments carry each four
long, partly retractile, fleshy cones, two situated dorsally and two
ventrally, so that, viewed in section, these segments appear like a
four-rayed star. It is not always easy to make out the ventral cones.
These eight long, fleshy points are kept in contact with the mine, and
are of great service to the larva in keeping it firmly anchored in posi¬
tion, acting as a thrusting-block while the larva feeds. They are also
used in progression, as Albarda remarks ( l.c .). Of the curious
tenth abdominal Liiders gives such an excellent description that I feel
bound to translate it (l.c., p. 26) : — “Tenth of extraordinary length,
fully as long as the three preceding segments, narrowed down towards
the posterior, flat, with a longitudinal furrow, so that it appears as if
it were formed out of two parts grown together; it terminates as a
fish’s tail in two outwardly directed points.” Every writer on the
subject says the larva has no feet, and I believe that to be true, except
in the last stage, as the larva always appears so perfectly helpless
when taken from the mine. Nevertheless, there are some very sug¬
gestive furrows and depressions on the abdominal segments, which
usually carry prolegs in other larva?. When the larva mines on the under
surface of a well-hidden leaf it is so perfectly colourless that it reminds
one rather of a beautiful marine creature than an inhabitant of the
dry land. The dark thoracic patch is then absent, and even the mouth
parts are almost devoid of colour.

Cocoon. — As soon as the larva has completed the work of mining
out this space which is to become the cocoon, it stretches itself straight
out, so that the head comes in contact with one end of this oval space,
and the tail with the opposite boundary, the body of the larva lying
parallel with the edge of the leaf. Now is the time to determine the
sex of the larva, for the creature has not yet lost its transparency,
though some of the internal organs appear to be gaining in opacity.

If a male we may see the testes, two oval bodies, one on each side of
the fifth abdominal segment in the dorsal area. The larva, however,
at this stage very soon loses its beautiful transparency, assuming a
waxy appearance. In the position described it remains motionless for
a period of 24 hours. Hoffmann ( l.c .) also gives 24 hours for this rest,
but Liiders (l.c., p. 26) says “ about two hours.” Considering the
great change which now takes place, I doubt whether the period, even
in the most propitious circumstances, is ever so short as two hours.
When lying thus, the thin upper skin of the leaf comes in contact with
the sticky dorsal skin of the larva, and, as the moisture begins to
evaporate, adheres to it, in the same way that a thin piece of paper will
adhere if laid over wet glass. It may be asked, Why does the mois¬
ture in the mine begin to evaporate ? While the larva continues to
mine juice is constantly supplied by the cells cut open by the larva,
and moisture is also excreted by the larva itself. When, however, the
larva becomes quiescent, both these supplies fail, if not entirely, at any
rate in such a degree as to be unable to keep pace with the natural
evaporation going on. As the loosened upper cuticle of the leaf, with
the larva adhering to it, dries, it slightly buckles the mine, lifting the
central portion of the larva up with it. While this is proceeding, the
larva, in its strange new form, may be seen inside the now effete, still
outstretched, old skin, shrinking to the proportions normal to the spin¬
ning stage. It withdraws the head and tail away from those portions
of the old skin, which appears to be firmly wedged into the angles
formed at the circumference of the mined space by the upper and lower
surfaces. At the end of the 24 hours the cervical and thoracic por¬
tions of the old larval skin appear to split off from the remainder, and
the head of the new larva appears. As soon as the head is well freed
from the old skin the “prrepupa,” as the larva has been called at this
stage (i.e., the prepupal stage) commences to line the lower surface of
the mined space with silk, incessantly passing its head from one side
to another, the threads running across the cocoon, more or less at right
angles to the body of the larva. While incessantly spinning, it gradu¬
ally withdraws its body from the old skin. The larva in its fourth
instar is so very dissimilar from its previous appearance that the first
time I observed it, not having read the literature on the subject, I
opened the cocoon to see how long, I think, it would take me to exe¬
cute vengeance on that horrid ichneumon. Perhaps the most noticable
characteristic about the larva in the spinning stage is its extraordinary
activity. The apparent eagerness with which it commences to spin,
and the energy it displays during the work are really astonishing. The
only thing I have seen at all equal in activity is the young larva of
Gracilaria stigmatella building its first cone at the apex of a young
willow leaf. Before long the praspupa turns its attention to the upper-
surface of the cocoon. This it lines in the same manner, passing the
spinneret rapidly from side to side. Here its legs and the adhesive
discs of the thorax come plainly into view as it clings to the upper-
surface of the cocoon. In about ten hours the cocoon is complete, and
in another ten hours the larva has thrown off its spinning dress and
donned that of the real pupa, which is already so fully formed that it
can wriggle actively in the cocoon.

Pr^epupa.— The prepupal form of the larva is more cylindrical
when viewed from above than in the three previous instars, though,

as Liiders remarks (l.c,. p. 27), the last four segments narrow down
considerably. It is of a beautiful fresh, milk-white colour — under the
microscope it appears snow white, almost glistening. It is covered to
a great extent by a fine pile, which gives it a sort of frosted appear¬
ance, or, as Bacot better describes it (Bacot, in Tutt’s Brit. Lep., i.,
p. 38), “something like a coating of short, pointed spines.” Head
partly retractile in the prothorax, convex, of more normal appearance.
As Heeger and Albarda say, it has the appearance of being divided into
three equal parts. In the two depressions are two hemispheres which
the above writers say are the eyes. The parts of the mouth are quite
altered. The large mandibles are gone from above, and a spinneret
has appeared below. On the thoracic segments are various furrows,
which may be vestiges of thoracic plates, and less extensive furrows
occur on the abdominal segments. In these latter, Liiders says (l.c.,
p. 27), “There is a large anterior and a small posterior tubercle.”
This looks very like trapezoidal tubercles. The sides of the second to
ninth abdominal segments carry nipple-like warts, large on six and
seven, very small on eight and nine. Heeger (l.c.) calls these
“ Haarwarzchen, and Liiders states (l.c.) that these, except those on
the eighth and ninth, are tipped with a bristle ; but, if so, it must he a
very minute one. The tenth abdominal segment terminates in two
blunt cones. Viewed in profile the spinning larva has a strong super¬
ficial resemblance to that of a Nepticulid. The thorax is very deep,
especially the metathorax, the body fairly cylindrical, but the last four
segments run to a blunt point. On the venter we see on the meso-
and meta-thorax two large ovoid “ walled foot-like balls,” as Liiders
calls them (l.c.), and on the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth abdominal
segments a pair of small dimples, in the position where the legs of
normal larva? appear. These balls are just like those in a similar posi¬
tion in the larva of Nepticula centifoliella , and are used in the same
way. From the pair of discs on the abdomen the larva can, and does,
protrude primitive prolegs. In Nepticula these prolegs appear to be
simple “ membranous prolongations ” (Tutt, Brit. Lep., i., p. 163),
but here they appear more as retractile cylinders placed on sunken
discs. The Nepticulid has the prolongations on abdominal segments
two, three, four, five, six, and seven ; here they are normal in position,
but are also without any kind of hooks. It is little use seeking for
these prolegs in a dead larva ; we then see only the depressions, but if
we watch a larva spinning silk over the upper surface of the cocoon we
can easily see how it clings on by means of the two thoracic discs and
the four pairs of abdominal prolegs. I have also seen these prolegs
when I have had the larva on a glass slide, but the little creature is
so terribly restless when alive that it requires a very great amount of
patience to make or confirm any observation.

Pupa.— Of the pupa Liiders says it belongs to Chapman’s pupie-
incoinpletie, with no free segments, but in the next line he describes
the movements of which it is capable. The position occupied by the
Phyllocnistis pupa in Dr. Chapman’s classification is as follows (Trans.
But. Sec. Bond., 1898, p. 118) : — “ Division B. — Incomplete, appen¬
dages often partially free. Sub-division 2.— Pupa free to move and
emerge from cocoon. Section a.— Larva concealed feeder, often
miner. Sub-section 1.— Free segments five and six in female, and
five, six, and seven in male.” It is difficult to make out the pupal

morphology in such a small subject as Phyllocnistis, and I have to thank
Dr. Chapman for his kindly aid. The pupa is slender, with a rather
wide metathorax. The abdominal segments very well marked, except
the eighth, ninth, and tenth. The posterior margins of the fourth,
fifth, and sixth abdominal segments are much thickened and roughened.
The limbs are not fixed firmly to the body. The antennal cases reach
to the centre of the fourth abdominal segment. Coming out below
these the third pair of legs is visible, and reaches to about the centre
of the fifth abdominal. The cases of the forewings are narrow, and
just reach the fifth abdominal segment, so that the cases of the third
pair of legs form the terminal portion of the limbs. The spiracles are
\eiy small and oval in outline. The headpiece is armed with an
S-shaped hook, below which, on either side, are two blunt knobs. The
space between the hook and the knobs bears a serrated ridge. The
pupa, viewed dorsally, has several peculiarities. On the dorsal head-
piece are two warts. On the mesothorax are two bristles directed out-
waids, and a slight ridge down the centre. The metathorax carries six
warts arranged in three pairs, two of them bearing bristles. The first
abdominal has two large and two small warts. On each side of the
anterior of the second abdominal are two large raised cylinders capped
by a hemisphere, out of Avhich springs a very large, stout, whitish
bristle, directed outwards, almost at right angles to the dorsum, with
a forward sweep. If the pupa be laid on its back these bristles sup¬
port it most firmly, on the same principle as the legs of a wheelbarrow.
On the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh abdominals these cylin¬
ders and bristles become lateral and much smaller. On the eighth ab¬
dominal they are present, but abortive. The second to the "’seventh
abdominals are each armed with a series of short, strong black hooks,
directed backwards, down the centre of the dorsal area. The third
to the seventh also bear, in addition to the dark hooks, which are part
and parcel of the pupal integument, a large pair of very different
whitish hooks, directed backwards and outwards, and which rest on
whitish sockets. The bases of these sockets may be traced some dis¬
tance below the skin. Possibly they may be connected with the inner
pupal envelope, and the moth, in emergence, may be able to exercise
some useful control over their movements. On the sides of the ninth
abdominal (I believe it to be the ninth) are two large, pale, sharply-
pointed cones, only partly diverging. The tenth abdominal is rounded,
but has a slight groove, reminding one of the same segment in the
prepupal form.

Emergence. — The elaborate armature of the pupa forms, altogether,
a most efficient apparatus for bringing the insect safely from the cocoon
into the light of day. The actual emergence of the moth is, I believe,
brought about in the following manner : — Lying on its back in the co¬
coon, the moth, still in the pupal skin, is held in position by the
bristles, of which the lateral keep the abdomen fairly in the centre of
the cocoon, whilst the long dorsal bristles of the second abdominal
segment prop up the head and thorax so that the head presses against
the upper surface, or roof, of the cocoon. A thrust is now given by a
lateral movement of the abdominal segments which rest on the lower
surface of the cocoon. The dorsal hooks on one side passing in a for¬
ward direction over some of the silken cross-threads which line the
lower surface of the cocoon. These hooks, once having passed over

the threads, cannot, from their conformation, slip back again, and so
are held fast. The movement is repeated, and the hooks on the oppo¬
site side of the dorsum advance in like manner, till the crook on the
headpiece of the pupa is pressed so hard against the roof of the cocoon
that it snaps off, leaving a sharp, straight point on the pupal head.
Perhaps the jerk of breaking causes the point to pierce the cocoon. In
any case, the advance of the abdomen thrusts the point through, and
the serrated edges of the head armature, aided by the lateral move¬
ments of the pupa, soon cut a clean transverse slit in the roof of the
cocoon. The abdomen continues its forward movement until more
than half the pupa is thrust out of the cocoon. By this time the
struggles of the moth rend the pupal skin, which splits transversely
across the thorax. On dehiscence the headpiece, clypeus, and mouth
parts come off in one piece, but are held to the rest of the pupa-case
principally by the antennas, which separate out partly, but are attached
at their base and apex. The limbs are then withdrawn from their
sheaths, and the moth, finally escaping from the pupal shell, seeks a
convenient point, to which it clings, while the wings rapidly expand,
and the living gem assumes all the glories appertaining to the species.

The Mine. — In sketching the above rough life-history I have
partly described the normal mine. The cuticle, severed from the leaf
by the larval jaws, remains loose while the larva is beneath, but as it
advances it ejects the digested fluid from the anus with such force
that it spreads over or floods the space immediately behind. This
causes the leaf cuticle to again adhere to the parenchyma, and the
wave-marks of each ejectment may often be traced in an old mine. In
perfectly normal mines no central excremental line appears. In some
cases such a line does exist in a portion of the mine. It may arise
from an ill-grown leaf, or from a defect in the larva’s jaws. In one
very marked case I found the point of the right mandible was slightly
deflected, and morsels of the more solid portion of the leaf were cut
off and thrown into the mine. The larva appeared to have no choice
but to swallow them with the juice, and as long as they were very
small the pieces passed through without, apparently, any harm being
done. But one morning this larva seemed to be in trouble. It lay
still in the mine, and I saw quite a large black mass, microscopically
speaking, lying in the cloaca, which was much distended. However,
the next day it succeeded in passing the obstruction, and again began
to feed. Two days after it was still feeding, but the next day it was
almost dead, and it never recovered. The larva has the power of
passing from one leaf to another by extending the mine down the
petiole, along the twig under the skin of the bark, and up another
petiole into a leaf. I must admit I have only observed this in captive
examples, and then only in three instances. However, we should not,
I think, be surprised to find that a method habitually adopted by one
species should be occasionally resorted to by another closely allied
species. I think Pln/llocnixtis salu/na normally passes from one leaf to
another, a single leaf not sufficing for its full nourishment; but on
this species I have only made very few observations. 1 first noticed
this occur in Phi/llocmstis sufl'usdla, by observing that two larva) from
mines in small leaves which 1 had marked were missing. As they
are, however, often difficult to detect, I supposed I had overlooked
them. These mines, nevertheless, did not progress, and yet there was

not the slightest trace of a dead larva. Subsequently I was surprised to
find part of a mine and a cocoon lower down on the same twig. When
I examined this leaf a few days previously there was neither mine nor
egg upon it. It appeared strange, but it was not till later that I con¬
nected the two events. On a later occasion-— August 2nd, 1901 —
another larva was missing from a mine, and this one I traced into the
petiole of the leaf, and found it about a quarter of an inch below the
base of the leaf. The next day this larva had mined down round the
leaf-stalk, and was brought up against a small leaf bud. The follow¬
ing day (August 4th) the larva was mining at the base of the petiole
of another leaf, as though about to enter the leaf. On August 5th
the larva had continued the mine down the twig instead of ascending
into the leaf. August 6th, the larva was dead in the mine. It had
mined down the stem below the water in which I kept the twig, and
was drowned. As above mentioned, the eggs are often laid on very
small leaves — -too small for a larva’s wants — but I fancy these leaves
continue to grow while the larva mines. If they do not do so the
larval habit of travelling from one leaf to another must be of common
occurrence. However, I have seen hundreds of larvae, and have never
observed this travelling in a state of freedom. A larva will always
avoid crossing the mine of another, but where there are two or more
in a small leaf this becomes inevitable. Should a larva, in crossing
another mine, come in contact with its inmate it is certain to kill it,
not purposely, but incidentally, in the course of its operations. There
is no hope for the victim once its delicate skin comes in contact with
the intruder’s jaws.

Pro-thoracic Shield. — The dark brown ovoid patch on the larval
prothorax is wTorthy of notice. It may be connected with a pro-
thoracic shield, but I am scarcely inclined to think its colour is. I
view it rather as of sematic significance. First of all, it only occurs
on those larvae which, by their position, are exposed to the light, and,
therefore, more likely to be seen by their enemies. Secondly, it is
situated not immediately behind the head but on the posterior portion
of the prothorax. This mark is absent in the first instar, but clearly
visible in the second, whilst in the third it appears in full force. The
colour may simply be due to the access of light, light being, as Wood
remarks (Tutt, Brit. Lep., i., p. 170), “ the most general and potent
factor in the production of pigmentation,” and, certainly, I think light
is in this case the direct cause, for if we take a young larva mining
the underside of a leaf and turn the leaf so as to expose the underside
to the light, the colour in the patch will appear in the third instar. I
have proved this by direct experiment, and have also noticed one case
(September 13th, 1901), where a larva mining on the underside bore
the black patch. The leaf in which it mined was so situated that the
undersurface was exposed to the light. The first time I noticed this
patch I passed the larva by, as I thought it was diseased. When a larva
dies in the mine dark patches often appear, the result, perhaps, of a
growth of some micro-fungus. Therefore, I fancy this dark patch
may be something of the nature of a warning colour, like the black
sunken patch in the larva of Stauro/ms fat/i, as mentioned by Poulton
(Colours of Animals, p. 281), a warning, for instance, for a parasite
that the larva is moribund, and therefore useless for its purpose.

STAUROPUS FAGI.

(Read January 7th, 1902, by A. W. MERA.)

When I promised to read a few notes on Stauropus fagi, I was
under the impression that I might produce a few details connected with
the species that were not generally known, but on looking up the sub¬
ject a little I find that a most exhaustive paper was read at this society
some years ago, leaving no point of interest untouched.* Under these
circumstances, all that is left to me is to repeat, in a somewhat cur¬
tailed form, what has already been said, hoping that some of the
members, like myself, have not kept in touch with all that has passed.
I believe the late W. H. Tugwell was the first to record the fact that
the young larvae of S. fagi eat nothing but the shell of the egg they
have just left until after the first moult. Since that time I have bred
them from the egg once or twice myself, and I could not detect that
anything was eaten for that period, with the exception of the eggshell.
It certainly seems very mysterious that a larva should exist for so long,
and nearly double its size, on the one meal which it takes immediately
after hatching. I remember reading that Mr. Tugwell said he watched
his larvae most carefully, and was perfectly certain as to his observa¬
tion, but although I am quite sure no part of the leaf is eaten, I still
think it possible that the larvae may obtain some nourishment from the
hairy stalks of the young shoots of the beech. I have repeatedly seen
the larvae resting on the new shoots of the beech, which are covered
with what might be described as fine down, with their front legs
moving in a manner which would suggest feeding, although nothing
appeared to be missed from the twigs. I have not tried the experiment
of depriving the larvae of their first meal of shell, but probably it is a
necessary tonic. I know that with Andria ( Dicranura ) rinula it is
necessary for the larvae to eat their cast-off skin, and when I have de¬
prived them of it they have invariably died.

The larva of S. fagi is a most remarkable creature, with its long
forelegs, and more resembles an ant than a caterpillar, and is quite
unlike any other British larva. In confinement the larvse require
plenty of room, as they are very much given to fighting, and very soon
lose their front legs in the struggle. In one batch that I had, several
lost one or more of their front legs, and although I did not keep the
wounded ones separate, when the moths emerged I had several which
only had stumps for their front legs, with the first joint and claw
missing. These had great difficulty in supporting themselves in a
position for their wings to dry. 1 am really not prepared to say
whether the forelegs of the larva produce the legs of the moths, or
whether the above was simply a coincidence. Mr. Hamm tells me
that the larva has the power of ejecting a strong acid. He says, “ as
I was once made painfully aware when I accidentally squeezed one, and
some of the fluid went into my eye.” He also tolls me that the larva;

* “ Notes on Stauropus fagi,” by A. F. Bayne, “ Transactions” for 1893, pp.

4-13.

are very fond of moisture, and that when changing the food they go to
the end that has been in the water and drink the moisture, hut I should
say that habit was not confined to S. jagi only, as I have noticed
various larvse do the same when kept in confinement. The favourite
food in nature is undoubtedly beech, but the lame have been beaten
from oak, birch and nut. Last year Mr. Burrows had one brought to
him which had been found feeding on whitethorn, from quite near the
town of Brentford. St. John gives apple as a food-plant, and in confine¬
ment they will eat maple and sycamore. In beech woods they may be
found by diligently searching the lower branches.

The probable method of pupation would be among the dry leaves
of the beech which lie so thickly in any hollows under the trees.
Newman says that the larva spins the leaves of the oak together to
pupate in, and that when the leaves fall from the tree they form a
kind of parachute to convey the pupa to the ground without any
damage. My own opinion is that the larva finds its way down the tree
before pupating, as they evince all those wandering habits which are so
general in most larvae before they spin up, and they have been found
by Mr. Holland in the beech woods at Reading on the ground in search
of a suitable place in which to pupate. It is true they are very fond
of spinning the leaves together, and when bred in confinement I have
usually placed the larvae which are ready to spin in small boxes with
plenty of leaves, and they more often than not prefer to form their
cocoon with a leaf top and bottom.

The substance of which the cocoon is formed of is more in the
nature of a gum than of silk, for when the leaf is removed which forms
the outer covering, all the veins of the leaf are represented on the sub¬
stance of the cocoon, as shown in one or two examples which I have
exhibited.

In rearing S. fagi I have always found by far the heaviest losses
occur in the pupa stage. The larvae as a rule feed up without any
trouble, provided that they are allowed to have their first meal of egg¬
shell ; but the pupae have a way of drying up when the moth is fully
formed, and I have not yet been able to find a really successful
way of treating them. Out of a brood of rather over twenty I bred
five moths, one of which was a cripple, and on opening the remaining
pupae, I found they had dried up with the fully formed moths inside.
In one or two cases the front of the pupa was a little cracked, from
which it would appear that the moth had made efforts to emerge but
was not successful. Another time I had a brood of about the same
number, and in this case the larvae were evidently bent on getting out
the same year, as they grew very rapidly and did not attain quite the
same size as my previous lot. These all emerged in August and it was
a most successful brood. As they were so short a time in the pupa, I
imagine they had not had time to dry up. I believe it is no uncommon
thing for part of a brood to emerge in August and part to come out
the following spring, but I have not had that occur with any of my
broods.

There is no doubt that the species is nowhere more abundant than
in the large beech woods near Reading, Marlow, and other places along
the ridges in the Thames Valley ; but away from beech woods it would
be considered rare. Epping Forest is another favourite locality, and I
have taken it at Brentwood, in Essex, and Mr. Studd tells me he takes

oile or two males each year in his moth trap near Exeter. Once, when
I was quite a boy, I took one at Hammersmith, I should think about
the year 1864. The specimen was taken resting on the side of the
house, and it is still in my cabinet. There were certainly no woods in
the neighbourhood in those days, hut the country was fairly open, and
as apple is said to be one of its food-plants it may possibly have fed up
on that tree, as there were plenty of gardens and orchards at no great
distance. The most northerly locality in which 1 have any knowledge
of recent captures is Wyre Forest, on the borders of Worcestershire
and Staffordshire, where a specimen was taken by Mr. A. J. Hodges,
in June 1898 or 1899. It was resting on a small sapling oak with the
wings almost wrapped round the tree. Mr. Massey tells me there is
one recorded for Yorkshire about 40 years ago, and one for Lancashire,
but with those exceptions it must he considered quite a southern insect.
I saw one exhibited at the South London Entomological Society some
years ago, which was taken by Mr. Kane in Ireland, and at the time
he said it was the only Irish specimen known to exist. It was remark¬
able for being much lighter than the general run. Mr. Horne and Mr.
Cannon both say they have never seen or heard of a Scotch specimen.

I understand that in the Heading district they show a preference
for resting on small trees, also that when one is found it frequently
happens that one or more are found in close proximity. The only time I
ever took the species at Brentwood, after taking one male, I remem¬
bered having heard of their congregating propensity, and with con¬
siderable searching I took another male a few yards from the first.
Mr. Studd tells me the only time he ever took them in Epping Forest
he found two, male and female, on the same beech tree, not touching
each other, but head to head, following the length of the tree.

From Mr. Hamm I learn that the earliest date on which it has
ever been taken in the wood round Reading was April 25th, and it has
been found from that date until -July 18th, in varying intervals accord¬
ing to weather, etc. He says “ 1 have known them to occur quite
plentifully in some seasons in the middle of May, and then perhaps
hardly one would be seen for a fortnight or more, when there would
he a burst again, and then, perhaps, they would occur sparingly into
July.” Mr. \Y. Barnes found one in Sulham Wood on November 6th,
1891, and Mr. W. Holland found two in Chazry Wood, on November
4th, in the same year. These captures undoubtedly formed part of a
second brood. The earliest date on which Mr. Burrows has taken
them in the Brentwood district, was on May 23rd, 1893, and the latest
July 4th, 1886. Strangely enough, my only record for Brentford was
on the very day before Mr. Burrows took his earliest, being May 22nd,
1893. I believe the dark form was first taken by the Rev. B. Smith,
at Great Marlow, Buckinghamshire, by assembling. Mr. Hamm tells
me it was not taken at Reading until 1891 or 1892. In the latter
year the species was very abundant and a large number were taken by
Mr. Holland and Mr. Clarke. Mr. Burrows took the black variety at
Brentwood as long ago as June 12th, 1886. In the Reading district 1
am told the dark form occurs on an average of one to every eight of
normal colour, and there are also intermediate forms. Mr. Clarke
seems to think the dark form has increased somewhat during the last
live or six years, but it may be that he has become more expert in
finding them. 1 am told that about Reading the dark ones are far

better protected on the dark beech trunks than the typical form, for
when once you have been accustomed to finding them the latter can
often be seen at rest some distance off, but the darker ones are only
seen by most careful searching. I am a little surprised to hear that
the dark ones are considered to be better protected than the type in the
Reading district, but possibly the trees there assume a somewhat
different tint from those I am best acquainted with. I know at Brent¬
wood the type is very well concealed. They are to be found at various
heights from the ground, the average would be about four to five feet,
sometimes less, and sometimes as high as ten or twelve feet.

In looking through the Doubleday collection 1 find there are no
dark ones whatever, and Newman has made no mention of that form,
and as I have always heard that Newman had the late Frederick
Bond’s collection at his disposal when compiling his “ British Moths,”
I think we may be safe in concluding that the black form is a modern
development.

The habit which S. fagi has of resting with the underwings pro¬
truding beyond the costa of the forewing is very unusual, although it
is not confined entirely to that species, as two or three other species
which are of widely different genera, such as Smerinthm ocellata,
Amorpha populi, and Eutrivha ijuerci folia, exhibit the same tendency.
In all cases, the part of the lower wing which is exposed to view has,
to some extent, the pattern of the forewing, but the part which is
covered has no trace of it. I have exhibited lower wings of both 8’.
fagi and S. ocellata. In a paper read byF. Merrifield at the Entomo¬
logical Society in 1899 there are some interesting observations on the
lame of S. fagi, an extract from which I will give here. The paper
was entitled “ Experiments and Observations upon the Susceptibility
of Certain Lepidopterous Larvae and Pup.e to the Colours of their
Surroundings.” It runs : — “ Mr. W. Holland and Mr. A. H. Hamm,
of the Hope Department, who are extremely skilled and accurate ob¬
servers, drew my attention last year (1898) to the fact that the lame
of this species differed in tint according as they are reared upon
beech or birch, and that the colours are in each case such as to conceal
them. During the present year Mr. Hamm reared two batches (from
different parents) upon the same foodplant, beech, but in other respects
under very different conditions as regards environment. One of the
batches was reared in a white, tissue-lined rectangular case, with a
perforated zinc lid, the other in a similar case, lined with black tissue
paper. We compared the two, placing both batches on white paper,
on July 18th, 1899. There were 24 larvae in the batch reared in tie
white case, and of these all but two were in the last stage, and mostly
advanced in it. All but one were much lighter than the larvae of the
species usually met with in nature, and some most markedly lighter.
The other batch consisted of fourteen larvae, of which ten were in the
last stage (mostly advanced), one in the last but one, and three in the
last but two. All were very dark, and most of them far darker than
those generally met with in nature. It is clear that this species is
highly sensitive, and it would be of great interest to repeat the experi¬
ments under conditions which have been found in other larvae to pro¬
duce the strongest effects. It is remarkable that such considerable
results followed from surroundings which were not apparently in con¬
tact with the lame, for these, at any rate when they were examined,

rested upon the twigs and not upon the walls of the case. I do not
think, in any of the previous experiments with larvae, that equal effects
have been produced in this manner, and one is tempted to inquire
whether it is possible that the larvae, in earlier and specially sensitive
stages, did not actually rest upon the black and white walls of the
case.”

I confess I am not cognisant of the conclusions at which Mr.
Merrifield arrived from the above experiments, hut it would seem that
the evidence goes to show that there must be a power at work besides
natural selection in bringing about those forms of insect life which so
closely resemble their immediate environment, as in the above experi¬
ment there is a strong tendency to assimilate to environment, without
the inffuence of heredity entering into the question, which in “ Natural
Selection ” is an all important factor.

I will conclude by saying that I hope I have not tired the
members present by a repetition of facts which, doubtless, many of
them have heard before, hut of those who have I will ask their
indulgence.

AFTER LEPIDOPTERA IN BRITISH GUIANA IN 1901.

(Read February 18th, 1902, by W. J. KAYE, F.E.S.)

This is a holiday paper, and must be looked upon as a fill-up, as it
were, to our programme, for want of sufficient solid matter. I have
chosen a somewhat wide-embracing title, and 1 suppose I should be
within the meaning of the Act if 1 began with the vicissitudes of the
journey on the way to British Guiana, and describe the horrors or
elysiums of the first three days out. Those who already know them¬
selves to be bad sailors would probably never be induced to go so far
afield, so I shall not be guilty of putting them off if I tell them that
the sea was just the reverse to the surface of a billiard table, and only
ten people out of 70 turned up for meals on those three first days. How¬
ever, Barbadoes was reached on the twelfth day, and, after transhipping
there, Georgetown was but another two days’ journey. Georgetown is
literally below the level of the sea, and in times past, when the drain¬
age was not all that it should have been, has suffered terribly from
epidemics of yellow fever. It is only ‘20 years since a visitation, and
unless the drainage can still be improved it is dreaded that another
outbreak may occur. For six days 1 remained in the town, calling on
various people and gathering what information I could as to collecting
and localities. This information turned out to he very meagre if
that, and 1 made up my mind, once and for all, to go my own way,
at any rate until 1 could interview the curator of the museum, Mr.
Quelch, who was away in the bush.

My first essay to collect was in the botanical gardens, until I could
get a steamer to take me to Bartica, on the Essequibo. Having, in
lH9b, made such good bags in the Trinidad Botanical Gardens, I ex¬
pected great things from similar gardens on the mainland, but neither
gieat things nor little things were there, and it looked as if lepidoptera
had been forbidden to enter the garden. A call on Mr. Jenman, the
superintendent, elicited the fact that no rain to speak of had fallen for
nearly six months, and that the usual short wet season of December
and January had not taken place at all. This was sad news to me,
as I knew the best collecting period in this part of the world was im¬
mediately following the wet seasons, and as I had purposely timed
myself to arrive at such a period the news of a long drought was not
reassuring for good collecting. Every corner of the very extensive
gardens was scanned for what it might possess entomologically; and
e\er\ damp corner spied out, these being the most likely places.
Everywhere it was the same — no lepidoptera at all ; a few neuroptera
skimmed over some of the broad dykes that drain the grounds, and
that was all that was visible entomologically, but botanically these
dykes contained one of nature’s greatest wonders — the Victoria
rei/ia. Imagine a dyke a quarter of a mile long and ten feet wide
completely covered with specimens of this wonderful plant. It so
happened I saw the plants at their best, with their flower spikes fully
developed. \ isitors to our Kew Gardens are generally struck with the
much-prized single plant, with some few leaves, which has every at¬
tention bestowed upon it to keep it alive, but in Guiana it is difficult
to keep any dyke free from this weed, and one of the annual jobs on a
large sugar estate is to clear out the I ictnria rei/ia from all the canals,
dykes, and ditches which intersect the country. It seems most re¬
markable how it was that this plant did not find its way naturally to
these places, seeing how quickly it has spread everywhere from the
Botanical Gardens where it was introduced from the Berbice river,
less than a hundred miles away, and with a perfectly fiat country in-
Gen ening. Having lully satisfied myself that there were no lepidop¬
tera, or practically none, in the gardens, 1 gave the canal, which
supplies a large quantity of water to Georgetown, some attention. It
was quickly ascertained that the neuroptera were strongly represented,
and for the time being l became a neuropterist, or, at any rate, a
collector of the order, boon, however, some lepidoptera came to the
net, and the season may be said to have opened with the capture of
Ihecla marsi/as and Helicopis cu pi-do. Some // experiidae of the sub¬
family of Paiiiphilinae were also in evidence, but by this time disap¬
pointment was irresistible, and there were many longings for the day'
to come round when the steamer was to leave for Bartica.

The day arrived, and having embarked we were quickly out of the
Demerara river and making for the mouth of the Essequibo. It soon
became obvious that this was more the sort of country for the ento¬
mologist and the naturalist generally. Seen from the steamer, the
forests that clothe the banks seem quite impenetrable, but that is not
so. On the edr/e of the rivers the forest certainly presents a perfect
wall of vegetation, as there all sorts of climbing plants interlace the
trees, but a short distance back the trees are not molested with these
climbers, and for the most part one can progress without much hinder-
ance. Bartica was reached in about nine hours on this occasion, and

although marked large and designated a town on some maps, it
scarcely deserves the distinction, even in Guiana, where towns are
scarce and qualification is low. It has this attraction to an entomolo¬
gist, that it is surrounded with forest. Here, in a tumhle-down,
timber-built structure called an hotel, I put up for a month, making
excursions all round. As my brother, who I have forgotten to mention
was with me, was anxious to see at least one of the falls of the Maza-
runi, we next day hired a boat, engaged a crew of eight, took ham¬
mocks and provisions for three days, and set out for a coviander’s hut,
the good boviander’s name being Fransook. We did not arrive here
until it was pitch-dark — about seven p.m. — and all thought of col¬
lecting had to be abandoned, at least for day flyers. A large acetylene
lamp was part of the impedimenta, and to this a few moths turned
up, hut a full moon was shining at the time or the result would, no
doubt, have been very different. Next morning we were up at the
regulation hour of five, and, although warned, we could scarcely
believe that our clothes, although protected, were quite wet with the
heavy dew. Having pushed off at six, there were visions of great and
many things by twelve. Here and there on some of the flowering
vines, large numbers of the pale yellow tJatopsilia statira were to be
seen, with an occasional C. aryante, also some of the common
Xymphidiums oi the Erycinidae were frequently seen, but it was impos¬
sible to work for these insects in such situations. The first fall, or
cataract, was negotiated, and soon afterwards the first named fall,
which has the very English name of Marshall, was safely passed.
Immediately after passing this camp was pitched, and before I had
the net ready a splendid Morpho rhetenor and M. neoptolenuis passed
us. This was the only occasion on which I saw M. rhetenor, but the
latter was seen frequently afterwards and sometimes brought inside
the net. Incidentally I may mention that all about this cataract
orchids are growing in some profusion. Oncidium altminuuii was in
flower, and w:e measured specimens with flower spikes 12'. 6” long.
Lepidoptera were not at all plentiful here, and as everything was so
dry I put it down to that cause, lthmnia zarepha flitted about among
the dead leaves, and it has since struck me very forcibly that the
bluish tinge to the wings seems to disappear in course of time. It
seems to be pretty generally considered in the colony that the falls and
cataracts in the rivers are the best places for orchids, and I expect
that in the season close following the rains lepidoptera are also plen¬
tiful in these situations. The natural beauty of these falls where the
river is studded with islands is most attractive, and the shooting of
the falls is somewhat exciting, especially after the rains. On the way
back Vapilio thoas was found, commonly flying along the Catabo road.
“ Road,” I should mention, here means simply a cleared passage in
the forest. In this case the road has not been kept open, and has now
become covered with thick underwood, almost the invariable sequel to
these clearings. Heliconim rhea was in abundance ; a II. ynarica and
II. cathannae were also taken. I should have liked to have explored
this road, as the day was very favourable, but as arrangements had
been made with the crew to return to Bartica, tracks were made for
the boat. Our feelings can be imagined when wre returned and found
the boat was high and dry on the mud, the tide having gone out, and
our boys asleep. There was nothing to be done except exist as we

could on the few remaining provisions and wait for the tide. Bartica
was eventually reached in such rough water as to make our situation
rather dangerous, and I made up my mind that probably I should
collect as much material round Bartica as in making a lengthened
journey up the Mazaruni, as I had originally intended. Moreover,
personally my leanings are towards settling down to collecting
rather than moving about and doing with a minimum of apparatus.

As my brother was leaving next day, we took a boat on March 31st
to explore a creek in the Mazaruni near by. Here I was pleased to
find Mesosemia meno'etes common, and in excellent condition. The
ground was a steep slope on the side of a small waterfall, away from
the sun. Owing to the prickly nature of a certain plant that was
growing everywhere, it was impossible to investigate far up the creek,
but seemingly this little black butterfly was the sole representative of
the order. \\ e are often struck with the extreme localism of some of
our British lepidoptera, but here in Guiana it is the usual thing for a
species to be local, and even when the haunt of a certain insect is
thought to have been discovered, after taking a couple of specimens
often no amount of perseverance will reveal a third. There are
really very few common species — that is, species that the late Mr.
Stainton would have said, “ the young collector will obtain his first
season with certainty.” This uncertainty gives a wonderful fillip to
the collector, if I may judge others by my own experience; but -why
this great uncertainty should prevail is one of the many problems that
want investigation. Is it possible that many of the species are fecund
enough but have such tremendous odds to contend against that a bare
half dozen, possibly, only arrive at perfection ? — or are these
species in a torrid climate less prolific? That there are enemies
to larvae I found by sad experience. Often 1 brought home a
handsome papilionid larva, amongst others, but it was impossible to
keep the small red ants from them, and death quickly followed.
Whether these ants would attack a larva in vigorous health or not I
hardly know ; my opinion is that the larva is worried by the ants to
start with, and later, when from want of food it becomes sickly, is
attacked and succumbs. I shall be asked, “ But why not keep the
ants from them ? ” The answer is, because it is almost imposiible to
do so without special apparatus. It is. doubtless, also very necessary
to have large airy cases for breeding, if only the ants can be got rid
of. After many attempts and constant failure with the larvae, I de¬
voted the whole time to the net.

The most interesting butterflies were certainly the Eryciniilae,
which were everywhere, and at all times to be obtained. After a very
short while an Erycinid could be noted by its habit of invariably
settling on the underside of the leaves, in just the same way as many
Pyrales do, especially of the sub-family Pyralinae. Day-flying moths
of this latter family were seldom seen, and I only recollect one or two
occasions when I congratulated myself on taking a new Erycinid, and
found with disgust it was only a “ miserable Pyralia as someone once
called it. Helicopis citpido was quite common around Bartica, and
especially so on one particular tree, and Eurybia juturna was equally
so, if not commoner, and always rested on the under surface of a
Maranta, especially in damp places. Euryytma Hsian and Nymphi-
cliuni lam is were only met with once, and as they were both worn,

probably a few weeks earlier — some time in February — one would have
a better chance. The occasion on which the latter of these two insects
was taken 1 shall remember for a very long time. I had set myself
the task of walking from Ivalacoon, on the Mazaruni, where I had
spent the previous day with Mr. McTurk, to Bartica, ria the Caburi
road. I had armed myself with a compass, and was told to return
to Ivalacoon if the road was too overgrown. A start was made
at 7 a. m., and after about a mile had been covered the sun shone
brilliantly, and Morpko menelaus simply swarmed. It was a grand sight
to see about 20 of these fine fellows flashing about in all directions, and
the day would have been memorable for that alone ; but I dared
not stay too long in this spot, as there was a lot of ground to cover
before the midday meal. After this the forest became more dense and
lepidoptera more scarce, and the ground was covered as fast as possible.
A white Lymantriid, apparently not yet described, now became plenti¬
ful, but kept out of reach of the net, seeming to like to skim over the
tops of trees and young underwood. After a lot of patience one of
these was secured, and, following that, a very large NympkicHuin made
its appearance, which turned out to be A . latiris, as I have mentioned.
The specimen is the worse for wear, and looks as if some bird had
been at it. It had a very feeble flight, but this may have been due to
its having lost some chips out of its wings. On getting up after
having papered it, my eye fell on what looked like a human being
perched in a tree almost straight above me. At first I felt startled and
could not believe my eyes, but there was no mistake; here was an
Indian, stark naked, crouched down in the fork of a tree, with a gun
of some sort in his hands, waiting for an ac-uri to come and feed on
the fallen nuts from the tree in which lie was perched, when it would
fall an easy prey to his weapon, however antiquated and out of date it
probably was. An experience like this after one had been walking for
over three hours through the still and lonely forest was a little nerve¬
upsetting, but a scientific fact was learned from it — namely, that the
red skin of the Indian harmonised so wonderfully with his surround¬
ings that it was difficult to see it, even though fully exposed to view.
A short distance more was covered, and then no path was at all dis¬
cernible, and it looked as if the distance would all have to be retraced.
I actually did turn back for a short way, and then, in spite of my com¬
pass telling me 1 was going in an utterly wrong direction, continued
what I originally thought might have been the track. Very soon
familiar ground was reached, and thankful I was that food was not to
be long delayed, as I thought it was. On the whole, one certainly
would expect more on a walk like this of some eight or nine miles,
through unbroken forest. Probably many more insects would have
been obtained where Morpho menelaus was making such a show, about
a mile in from the Mazaruni. One or two nice Erycinids were picked
up here also, where the forest was composed chiefly of the tree known
as Wallaba, the wood of which is used extensively for taking the place
of slates on roofs of houses. In this Wallaba forest there is not a
vestige of undergrowth of any kind, and rotten and decaying leaves is
all that is to be seen beneath the dense shade. 1 should have expected
some Ithomiids here, as the larva* are generally supposed to feed on
rotting leaves, but only Ithomia zarcpha was to be found, and that only
rarely. It already seemed evident that this was not the country for

Ithomnds, . and throughout my stay this was found to be the case-
ihe Jthomia already mentioned was abundant at Bartica and elsewhere,
but there was no swarming of these gauze-winged lepidoptera such as I
had met with in Venezuela at an altitude of 3,000 to 4,000 feet.
. hether the altitude is necessary I do not at present know for certain, but
trom the experience in Guiana it looks as if it were so. I have told you
of the walk home from Kalakoon, but I should have first taken you there,
as there was considerable interest in the outward walk, which was done
by way of a short cut, the distance being little more than four miles
by the direct path. It was during this outward walk that a new
1 apilio was caught, so if anyone is anxious to get his series the locality
is now given away. Another Papilio that was taken was P. trio pax,
found flying very low down and with a very lazy flight. A second
specimen, taken later, in exactly the same spot — this time a female —
had exactly the same habit, so it was evidently not a coincidence that
this species was easily taken. Later on, when a magnificent specimen
of Catonephele obrinux was seen, it certainly would have been a happy
coincidence if it had been easily taken, or even if it had been taken
with difficulty. . This fine Nymphalid was always found to be most
restive and difficult to approach, and even when attracted by rotten
fruit, which I sometimes treated it to, never seemed to be off its guard.
The delicate shades of green on the underside, as might be imagined,
make the insect as inconspicuous at rest as it is conspicuous when on
the wing. But, to continue this walk which was started. One of the
difficulties to be contended with was the crossing of several streams.
Those that are not too wide can sometimes be got over with a good
broad jump, if one is feeling fit and up to it, but such a proceeding,
although tolerably easy in one direction, often becomes impossible if
one wishes to return the same way. I nearly always preferred
bridging these streams with my own private bridge, formed of a couple
of fallen trees, which are generally obtainable in such places, which
must necessarily be damp, and where decay is rapid. Once the bridge
is across, it requires a lot of negotiation to safely walk over the slip¬
pery, moss-grown trunk ; but this “ walking of tacubas,” as these
bridges are called in Guiana, must be got used to if one does not want
to curtail one’s field of operations. The short cut to Kalacoon has
this disadvantage, that there are several of these streams to cross. On
the other hand, the lepidoptera are drawn to these situations, and, of
course, the lepidoptera in their turn draw investigators. The Nym¬
phalid Hi a artorion was generally present at these critical situations,
and as it is very easily taken when once one is on the right side of the
stream, the inducement to be on the right side was frequently strong.
The flight of this handsome insect is most peculiar ; it seems to flit along
in an aimless sort of fashion, and then to settle for quite a long while.
Often I could walk right up to the insect without its attempting to fly
away. All the eight or ten specimens taken were secured in the early
morning. In fact, early morning and late afternoon are quite the
best times for collecting generally, and if one happens to be out about
2.30 or so and waits till about four o’clock, quite an awakening of in¬
sect life seems to take place. Personally, also, one feels quite a relief
often at this time from the sweltering heat, and it is probable that
insect, bird, and animal life feel the benefit also. The true Nympha-
lids never seemed to have too much sunshine- for their wants, but

these were surprisingly few in number, and the species taken can be
numbered on the fingers of one hand. A butterfly that really loves the
sun, and which has been christened the sun butterfly by the natives, is
Morpho hecuba. It never flies unless the day is very hot and sunny,
and then soars along, hardly moving its wings, at an altitude of some
40 feet or so. 1 used to wait day after day for one to descend, but I
never got even an outside chance of catching one. Members might
be interested to know (and they will please forgive me if they are not)
that a fine specimen of this species was recently sold by auction for
eight and a half guineas. This must be strong evidence that the
capture is very rarely effected. The species is far from rare in Guiana,
as I must have seen a score of specimens, at least. If one of our ex¬
pert breeders of lepidoptera could obtain a brood of 300 or so from
ova, perhaps he might be induced to retail them at a reduction of the
odd half guinea ! This species, unlike its blue relatives, could not be
attracted with meat or rotten fruit, but unless one can obtain a whole
carcase there is very little use in putting 41b. or 51b. out, as ants or
birds of prey, and possibly some carnivorous animal, may finish it in
a night. My most successful bait was a complete bunch of bananas,
which, with the aid of a nigger, I managed to suspend from a tree by
a rope. Caligos seemed to relish this especially. The bold eye-like
marking on the underside, I fancy, must be a warning mark, as these
insects invariably settle with their wings folded, generally on a bare
tree trunk, showing the eye-mark in a most conspicuous manner. The
Satyrids of the genera Pierella and Haetera were also much attracted
to these bananas, but a difficulty in the capture of any of these was
that the slightest touch knocked off the bananas from the rotten stem.
However, this particular bunch accounted for some nice insects. I
had hoped to be able to show you photographs of this bunch of bananas
with insects in it, but my knowledge of the science of photography was
not like the bananas, sufficiently ripe, and the films show a blank.
One of the great difficulties to contend with in collecting in these
forests is that there is practically no natural bait in the shape of
flowers. When one does, however, find a tree in flower there are gene¬
rally Papilios, Erycinids, Lycaenids, and hummingbirds buzzing at it,
and plenty of sport can be enjoyed. If one could only walk along the
top of the forest instead of at the bottom one would have flowers in
plenty, and with them their attendant fertilizers, the insects. Previously
not a single species of the Hawk moths had been seen, but now the
appearance of a Macroglossid was welcomed. It turned out to be the
common Aellopus cicalas, but as I had never met with it before, and
as the insect was tolerably plentiful in this one particular spot, plans
were made for securing a series. The place where they occurred was a
sort of green lane overgrown with weeds and coarse grass. Although
visited at all times of the day, a specimen was never seen before 4 p.m.,
and about an hour later was the best time for them, so, with this
knowledge gained, specimens could generally be secured, if a sufficient
amount of dexterity was not wanting. The time of day at which
certain insects appeared was most interesting. For the Syntmnidae, by
far the best time was in the early morning, between eight and ten.
It is well known that they are taken at all times of the day, and I have
myself in Trinidad and elsewhere taken them in the afternoon, for
instance, but certainly while in Guiana specimens were either taken

in the early morning or not again till after dark, when they were
sometimes to be obtained at light.

On Monday, April 8th, two other men and myself made a tour of
inspection of the Camaria road on the Cuyuni branch of the Esse-
quibo. Entomologically there was not much to record. At the
landing place, 'Papilio macroailaus was conspicuous, and a short way
in, Morpho a eh dies was observed. Half way to this place a halt was
made for the inner man, as it was necessary to procure firewood.
The place was a swampy one, and the roots of the trees growing here
had such buttressed roots that we were all struck with astonishment,
it being quite difficult to move about between these great projections.
I cannot refrain here from mentioning the signboards that one sees at
intervals along the bank of the Mazaruni just before turning into the
Cuyuni. It must be stated that there is a convict penal settlement
here, and to prevent the off' chance of anyone coming in contact with
a convict these notice boards bear the initials, “ H.M.P.S.” I sup¬
pose I need not mention that a well-known lepidopterist abbreviates
his name in this way, and in consequence I could never pass a board
without some feeling of amusement at this strange coincidence. The
return journey was made at 8.80 from the landing, having groped our
way in the dark back through 4 miles of forest. Soon after embarking
it looked as if a watery grave was close at hand. The boat struck on
a rock and heaved over on its side. It was a touch and go, but for¬
tunately we did not go, as we might easily have done— to the bottom.
After hours of laborious, slow progression, we arrived at Bartica in
the small hours of the morning. The lepidoptera from this time
seemed to be getting scarcer, probably on account of the very hot,
sultry weather which was presaging the rainy season. Some fresh
insects began to put in an appearance — the Opsiphanids. These are
essentially twilight fliers, and on the wing one would never suspect
that they were Rhopalocera, as the flight is like some Lasiocamps or
Saturniids, only not so rapid. Opsiphanex inrirae and O. cassiae were
taken flying high up round and round the hotel, closely followed very
often by a bat. To the human intelligence, the bat would have acted
wisely if it had suddenly reversed its direction, but Nature does things
in her own way, and I fancy I accounted for more Opsiphanes by
waiting at an open window.

One of the last places to be explored while staying at Bartica w-as
Cow7 Island — called Cow, I fancy, because a number of cattle are kept
here. The visit was made with two professional collectors, who were,
curiously enough, stopping at Bartica. Me had heard that the place
was swarming w?ith snakes, but we could not find one between us.
Lepidoptera were not much in evidence either, and as the male sex of
the grazing quadrupeds gave us some anxiety, we left this once-upon-a-
time leper station, and pegged away again at the already well-known
paths on the mainland. After spending a complete month at Bartica,
and as rain had now begun in earnest, stopping collecting altogether
on some days, 1 resolved to try new ground. Rockstone, some 30 odd
miles higher up the Essequibo, was chosen, but as the journey up the
river at this point requires a good, chosen crew to negotiate the falls,
and as the place can be reached by a long, circuitous route, safer,
however, and cheaper, the latter was chosen. To do this, Georgetowm
must be sought again, a steamer must be W’aited for to go up the

Demerara river, and then a narrow-gauge single railway conveys one
across the nineteen miles of forest to Rockstone, on the Essequibo.

Rockstone consists of an hotel, in reality used only as a risthouse,
the stations — railway and police — and a post-office ; some rain shelters
where the gold diggers sling their hammocks complete the list of
the buildings, either public or private. When the hotel was first
opened, about two years ago, the neighbourhood was found so un¬
healthy that no one could stay in the place more than a fortnight.
Since then eucalyptus trees have been planted all round the place, and,
whether due to their influence or not, the place has improved. It was
originally thought that, perhaps, people from toWn would come out for
a change. But the change has been such an unpleasant occasion that
now one can have the place to oneself, as I actually did, save for those
who come down the river and sleep here for the night. Entomologi-
eally this place is ideal. There is a large gallery running all round the
hotel, with a white roof, and with a good strong lamp many moths
come to light. In such a situation — namely, on the edge of a river—
Pyralidac preponderate. Xoctuae, probably, are next, and GeometHdae,
Spkinyidae, Syntomidae, Xotudontidae come in smaller numbers. The
number of Sphinyidae taken at light was disappointing. Not more
than eight or ten specimens were so taken during the whole tour ; but,
as one of these, Ambiilyx curacies, is a very rare species, one must not
grumble. This latter, however, was taken at Bartica. The day after
arrival Colaenis phaerusa w7as dashing about just outside the hotel,
among some second year’s growth, where the forest had been originally
cleared. After taking a couple or so, with much trouble, I sauntered
up the railway and came across one of those real tropical sights,
a regular herd of yellow butterflies, sitting on the white sand which
forms the ballast for the railway. The first interesting thing was to
see what species they belonged to, and I was surprised to find that
they were Apr mm (< ' atop&ilia ) s tat ira, and not < atn/isilia seniiiic, as I
expected them to be. Both on this and subsequent occasions 1 noticed
one or two C. ary ante amongst them. The next question to be asked
was what are they doing here all together? 1 answered this that they
were drinking, or thought they were, as the patch they were on was
yellowish-coloured, and suggested that either a locomotive had let out
some dirty water or, what was as likely, that some animal or other
had done the same thing. On this occasion there was some reason
why all these individuals should be collected in one spot, but subse¬
quently, often after a heavy shower, one would come across a little
swarm (there is no other word) all settled, and for no apparent reason,
all huddled together. Continuing the walk up the line, a couple of
anteaters were seen to suddenly emerge from the forest. 1 stood still
and awaited them for some time, and from the way they sniffed the
steel railsl should say that was their first acquaintance with civilisation.
Lepidoptera along the line out in the sunshine were, as usual, scarce,
so a turn was made into one of the forest paths, where timber was
being hauled. Some of the numerous Euptychias immediately became
visible, and then rain descended, and I crouched down under a macin¬
tosh cape that I always carried, and had to remain so for about a
couple of hours. This put a stop to the first day’s sport. The fol¬
lowing day, April 27th, was very fine, and a most enjoyable ramble
was made. A specimen of Meyaleura pcleus, just drying its wings,
with the pupa case alongside it, was taken from a mora tree, and there

can be no doubt that this species feeds on this giant forest tree. One
of the episodes that one has to get used to in these forests is the crash
one occasionally hears ; it is, probably, one of these enormous raora
trees falling. After a certain period they, like our elms, seem to get
rotten at the roots and come thundering down. Immediately behind
the hotel there was one of these trees, and I was fortunate enough to
be looking out one afternoon and saw this giant fall without the slightest
warning. Close by where the M. peleti* was taken, the large brown
Erycinid Nymphidinni arche was plentiful. Their flight was most
rapid, and when in the net always made that ominous whirr, the
result of which often spells wreck. The Papilionidae were repre¬
sented by a single specimen of P. parsodes during the fortnight spent
at Rockstone, and there is no doubt that that family is not to be
obtained in the wet season, or, at any rate, none but stragglers, for on
the Potaro I never saw a Papilio at all. On the other hand, the
Morphinae appear to be at their best at the commencement of the
rainy season, and I was also informed that I was at the best time for
the “ big blues,” or “ bonny blues,” as they are variously termed. In
a general way, however, it may be taken that during the wet season
the insects, like the vegetation, are in active growth and development,
and a large majority must be in the larval state. Growth is, however,
so rapid that sometimes in a month the whole metamorphoses from
egg to perfect insect are performed. This is especially true of the
Ueliconinae. It was hard work at Rockstone, getting much during the
day, and what with perpetual torrential rains at intervals, it was slow7
enough to fill in the time. On the slightest break in the weather the
net and satchel were seized, and a bolt made for one of the forest
paths. While the sunshine lasted something was generally to be
taken, though for the most part not actually in the sun itself.

Evening work with the acetylene lamp was beginning to get
exciting, especially as members of the attractive and much-sought-
after family, Syntoinidac’, were getting fairly numerous. From 7 p.m.
till 11 p.m. was busily occupied in scraping the roof of the verandah.
A sheet put up behind the lamp did not answer the purpose it serves
in our Fen country, and I found that in most cases the moths pre¬
ferred hiding themselves behind some rafter in the roof. The dazzling
light of the acetylene may have been too strong, and I am bound to
confess that from one of the feeble paraffin lamps belonging to the
establishment, I obtained more specimens than from my glorified
installation. I find in my diary that I have made a note that Tuesday,
May 7th, was the best collecting (that is, night collecting) from the start.

There had been many rumours from the private company w7ho are
responsible for your transit in this part of the country that the large
stern-wheeled launch would one day make a second trial trip up
through to Tumatumari, on the Potaro, a large tributary of the
Essequibo, and it was suddenly decided that the following day the
trip would be made. 1 had an invitation, so forthwith consented
to go. We started at 7 a.m. The early part of the trip was
plain sailing, hut going through the rapids and dodging the rocks
made us all a little anxious, especially as previously this good craft
had stranded before the really dangerous places were reached. The
Crab Falls and Tigri Falls were successfully passed, and as these were
the chief cause of anxiety, we afterwards settled down a bit, to take in
the scenery and something else. The picture presented at the falls o\

Tigri is wild in the extreme. The river is broken up into a number
of channels, and between are islands of various sizes overgrown with
bushes, past which, and over which in times of flood, as on the occa¬
sion of my visit, the water swirls by. At Tumatumari I was intro¬
duced to the genial gold officer, Mr. A. K. Menzies, who, when he
heard I was a visitor, invited me to go to the Potaro Station, further
up the river, and back from the waterside, some twelve miles. This
sounded excellent, and the following morning, after having viewed the
grand Tumatumari Cataract from all points of vantage, we started in
the miniature launch huddled together with eight or ten swarthy
niggers. The river was fairly down ” this morning, and the launch
could only make two miles an hour. Through one of the rapids,
although the engine was going as if it would burst, the launch would
not move, and it became necessary to unhitch a boat we were towing,
put some of our black passengers therein, and try again. We now
crawled through, and the niggers, having pulled the other boat along
by overhanging boughs, joined us again.

The Potaro landing was reached, and, having got the loan of a
springless two-wheeled cart, a start was made for the next stage of the
journey. The road is “ a corduroy,” made with small tree trunks laid
crosswise, and the travelling is not devoid of motion. Here, at last, T said
to myself, I should find insect life abundant and probably somewhat diffe¬
rent, as we were now 170 odd miles from the coast. After eight miles
had been accomplished my friend decided to go and ask for lodging
at the house of one of the two other white men who live in this place.
Next morning we decided to walk the remaining four miles to the
Government station. Here prac tically the whole of the remaining col¬
lecting was done. The opening day was heralded with the capture of
some nice Theclids, amongst others, but what was most gratifying was
to see some insects swarming. Melinaea nineine, M. era wen, Ceratinia
rallmia, ( '. reritabilis, Mel. eyina , Lycorea pasiniintia and L. ceres, to¬
gether sometimes covered the white blossoms of a plant growing along¬
side the roadway. The similar colouring of all these different insects
could not but strike one. These colours — brown, yellow, and black-
form quite the commonest colouring of the insects of Guiana, and it
is now pretty well agreed that it has come about by the influence of
mimicry, those brown, yellow, and black species that were distasteful
remaining as types to which numbers of other species have converged
by a process of natural selection. Although the enemies are, and
must be, very numerous to bring about such a state of things, they are
not by any means in evidence. Soft-billed birds are rarely seen, and
the struggle must be kept up by lizards and such like creatures. The
absence of birds, particularly song-birds, is most noticeable. The
parrots, toucanos, and macaws one hears occasionally screeching over¬
head, high up among the branches of the tallest trees, but such a thing
as a song-bird is foreign to these woodlands. Is it possible we here
again have evidence of the terrible competition for life in these forests?
Can it be that what might be song-birds are too engaged in looking-
after their safety, and, also, might not their song reveal their presence
to some of their enemies? Such queries as these suggest themselves
as being within the, realm of possibility, after what one sees going on
with the lepidoptera. Botanically, also, the struggle is keen, if not
keenest of all, although in quite a different way. Might, here, is
what is most needed ; the strongest wins. The cases where lepidop-

tera exist merely by mistaken identity are, in Guiana, wonderfully
numerous. Frequently I found myself taking something altogether
different from what I thought it to be. One of the most interesting
cases that came under my notice was an instance of three groups
being involved — -viz., Erycinidae, Ithomiinae of the Nymphalidae, and
the Hypsidae. Two different families of butterflies and one of moths.

I do not think there is any reason to believe that any of these species
are palatable. It is probably a Mullerian group, one of the species
having been dominant. From the relative abundance of one to an¬
other, the moth would be more influential, as being in much greater
abundance than either of the two butterflies. It is remarkable that a
species of Stalactis, viz., satellites, exists on the Upper Amazons that
exactly resembles this moth Lauron partita, but apparently does not
occur in Guiana. I feel considerable doubt in my own mind if true
Batesian mimicry exists. Are some species really so palatable to
birds, etc., that were they not similar in colouring to other distasteful
species they would become exterminated ? The accumulating evidence
goes to disprove it : (1) the so-called mimicked species is often fat-
more numerous than the mimicker — a state of affairs that would give
little protection to a persecuted species ; (2) the so-called mimicked
species are attacked just as much as the so-called mimicking species.
It appears, therefore, to matter little to an insect whether it be palat¬
able or not. If it is like one or more other insects the attacks will be
shared, roughly, in proportion to the abundance of each. The “ pro¬
portions ” have not been hitherto much considered, but they must be
of the utmost importance in the competition.

After the first day at the Potaro station it rained, on and
off, the whole time, and as it was now the middle of May I
had to expect bad weather. In the West Indian islands and in
Georgetown the sun generally appears immediately after a heavy
shower, but in the depths of the forest, as one is on the Potaro,
especially in the low, swampy parts, the sun sometimes does not
show itself for days at a time, and collecting is very seriously
interrupted. The interruption at last became so constant that I de¬
cided to work my way back to town, and thence go to Trinidad again,
where I knew the sun was more obliging. As in coming, I broke the
twelve jolty miles to the waterside at the eight-mile house, this time
for two days, and during the time my kind host (Mr. C. B. Roberts)
became so interested that he said he would collect for me, with what
splendid results you will be able to judge for yourselves. I decided,
when the time came, to walk to the waterside instead of driving, and
the decision was repaid. Morphos, of how many species I don’t know,
swarmed, but Morpho hecuba, M. adonis, and M. menelaus were there
for certain. M. adonis had not been seen before, but was now abun¬
dant. A single specimen only was caught, and as it has a large piece
out of one of its wings, that probably explains how it came within
striking distance, its flight having been enfeebled thereby. One of the
most splendid Theclids, Evenus nobilis, was then taken, and the pro¬
verbial last day being the best, nearly, if not quite came true.

Gentlemen, there are many things I have not told you about. I
have sketched the expedition up till the beginning of the return
journey from the Potaro, and think this a fitting point to leave you,
as up till now the fell fiend malaria had not interfered with the
enjoyment of the trip. Soon after this I found I was not to escape,

and, owing to persistent attacks, had to abandon a more lengthened
stay. I have since been asked, “ Were all the butterflies worth the
penalty?” Lying in one’s hammock with one’s temperature up to
104 or 105°, and feeling as if it was immaterial whether the world
came to an end, one would say no ; but with a return to health one
looks on the penalty with a light heart, and feels inclined to risk any¬
thing, and I should boldly answer yes to any such query now. No
words, and mine least, can convey an adequate idea of what collecting
in these forests is really like till one tries it. 1 can only say in con¬
clusion it has been a very real pleasure to write this paper. It has
felt like living the time over again, and 1 hope I have transported you
with me for the time being.

THE IMPORTANCE OF CERTAIN LARVAL CHARACTERS AS A
GUIDE IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE SPHINGIDS.

(Head March 4th, 190*2, hy A. BACOT, F.E.S.)

A few years since 1 wrote a short paper dealing with the possible
relationship ol 7 Htnorpha ( I'.nilroinix ) rcrxicolora and the Sphingids
(hut. Iiec. , v i i . , pp. 217-1246). Since then 1 have had the opportunity,
thanks to the kindness of Dr. T. A. Chapman, Mr. J. W. Tutt, and
many other friends, of examining a few more Sphingids and many
other lepidopterous larva*, and my conclusions as expressed in the
above paper have undergone considerable modification in consequence.

Many of the points of resemblance that I there referred to I have
since found to be common, with some modification, to other, and, in
some instances, widely separated groups. So that, while regarding
them as signs of a relationship, it is in a looser and broader sense
than I had previously imagined. Indeed, so widely divergent are some
of these groups from each other, that there can be, l take it, no
question of near relationship, and we are forced to regard them as
parallel developments to meet similar needs. Just as analogous
developments have arisen independently in Marsupials and Placentals,
so we find the same specialisation arising among groups of lepidop-
tera having Hat eggs and those having upright ones, a difference that
is possibly as important as that separating the placentals from the
marsupial mammalia.

To take a few instances that were referred to in my previous paper
assigns of relationship between 7 Umorpha (Hint rom is) rcrxicolora and
the Sphingids : — rl he horn on Hth abdominal segment : This cha¬
racter is as well developed in one of the North American Notodonts,
closely allied to our A. dictaea, as in any of our British Sphingids;
oblique stripes : these are a noticeable feature of Xotmlonta trepida.
Shagreen or mammillary based secondary hairs occur in many butter-
Hy lai va*, and an analogous, if not exactly similar, development is to
be found in some Creometrid larva*. (. ha r a. rex jaxiux offers a good

example of the former, and Geometra papilionana of the latter ; and
it is remarkable that with butterfly larva*, as Dr. Dyar has pointed
out, and also with G. papilionaria, the shagreen or mammillary based
hairs usually occur as a secondary growth, making their first appear¬
ance after the first moult, as is the case with the Sphingids other than
Smerinthus. Bifid or forked hairs are also to be met with among the
butterfly larvae, Leucophasia sinapis, Neincobius Incina, and Chryso-
phaniis phlaeas being examples, as well as among the Sphingid larvae,
and this character is also paralleled among the Geometrids by Geometra
papilionaria, a further illustration that similarity of structure goes
with a similarity of habits, and presumably of needs.

These, among many other examples, had so influenced my views
since writing on the relationship of Dimorpha versicolora to the
Sphingids, that when the problem of the origin of the last-named
group was raised by Mr. Tutt, in view of the approaching publication
of the third volume of his work on The British Lepidoptera, it was by
no means clear to me whether the Sphingids were to be considered as
a homogeneous group arising from a common Sphingid ancestor, or if
they might not be the result of parallel development such as we find
between the imaginal stages of Si/n tom is phetjea and the Zygamids, or
between Arsilonche alhorenosa and the Calamias, Leucanias, Nonagrias,
and Tapinostolas, which make up the group called “ Wainscots ” — a
parallel development, or perhaps convergence, that is, of different
stirpes related to each other, and at some very distant base, of course,
springing from a common ancestor. But the common ancestor was
in no sense a Sphingid, and gave rise to groups as widely divergent,
say, as an Ay lata tail, Dimorpha ( Kndromis ) versicolora, Bombi/x mori,
and Tli/perchiria i<>, which subsequently converged and developed on
parallel lines to form the apparently homogeneous group of moths we
call “ Hawks.”

Evidence of breaks or faults in the larval characters of the
Sphingids is not wanting, and one at least occurs with regard to the
minuter larval characters of the 1st instar, characters that, to my
thinking, are less likely to be the results of convergence than the more
striking and obviously useful ones. Some discussion and correspond¬
ence that 1 had with Dr. T. A. Chapman, however, convinced me that
there was in reality no doubt of the Sphingids being a truly homo¬
geneous family (see Dr. Chapman’s remarks on the antenna? of the
Sphingids, in Tutt’s British Lepidoptera, iii . , pp. 377-378) with a
common descent. But the evidence of a rift within the group
remains, and to my mind points to the sub-division of the European
species of the superfamily into two main branches. Whether exotic
material would show others of equal value, or if all the species would
fall into one or other of my main divisions, remains to be seen.

Although the Sphingid larva presents a high degree of specialisa¬
tion in the form, coloration, markings, and in some points of structure
— such as the conjunction and raising of the bases of tubercle i on
the 8th abdominal segment into a more or less developed horn bearing
the two tubercles and their hairs on its summit, the shape of the head
in some species, and in the tendency to have either a uniform coat
of generally distributed fine short hairs, or to become completely
naked — it still retains in all groups other than Smerinthus a more or
less primitive 1st skin in which the single-haired primitive tubercles

may be clearly observed. Even in Smerinthus they can be easily dis¬
tinguished under a lin. objective, owing to their overtopping the
smaller secondary hairs, which in Smerinthus alone are present on the
general body area in the 1st instar. The arrangement of the dorsal
and lateral tubercles, while agreeing in its general aspect with that of
other lepidopterous larva?, presents some special features. Briefly, the
arrangement is : i and ii in trapezoidal position, iii supra-spiracular,

iv beneath the spiracle, and v normally shifted up in front of spiracle
on the anterior margin of segment. In one or two sj>ecies, however,

v on the 1st abdominal segment is clearly situated on the lateral
flange, only slightly above the plane of iv, and decidedly sub-
spiracular, while in Hi/les euphorbiae tubercles iv and v of 1st ab¬
dominal segment are conjoined, the two setae being situated on a small
oval plate beneath the spiracle, so that there is no doubt of the
identity of the prespiracular of the Sphinges with v of the larva? of
other families. On the 2nd and 3rd thoracic segments, iv is wanting,
iii bears two hairs on a small oval plate, and v is on anterior margin
of the segment, as on the abdominals. This arrangement, so far as
my present rather slender knowledge goes, holds good throughout the
group, but probably only the position of v and the absence of iv on
meso- and meta-thorax is likely to be characteristic of the Sphingids.
When, however, we come to the dorsal tubercles on the last-named
segments, we get the distinct line of cleavage within the group that
has been referred to above. In h'uinorpha ( Choerocampa ), and also in
Phryxids ( Deilephila ), the dorsals i and ii on the meso- and meta-thoracic
segments are situated on separate sub-segments, and form the corners
of an oblong or low trapezoid when viewed from above ; while in all
the other species I have seen of Sonia ( Macrorjlossa ), He mans (Sphinx),
and Amorpha ( Smerinthus ), they are arranged as twin tubercles with
conjoined bases (i + ii) on the same sub-segment.

\\ ith regard to the tubercles of lepidopterous larva? in general, I
am as yet very far from a sufficiently complete or exhaustive know¬
ledge to allow of my mapping out their full significance or phyiogeny,
but I feel tolerably sure that they were more numerous on the ancestral
larvae than with the existing forms, and that specialisation has largely
been by way of reduction in number, as a general tendency, but often
secondarily by way of an increase in size of base and multiplication of
secondary setie on or around the individual primary tubercles. The
more or less complete coats of minute spicules and secondary hairs
springing from the general skin surface I am not here referring to, as
they in all probability form a problem apart. The two processes
above-mentioned of the evolution or devolution of primary tubercles
may be in progress at one and the same time, as, for instance, in
Saturniids and Lachneids, or Liparids and Arctiids; the former in¬
creasing the size of i, while reducing or losing ii, and the latter showing
a waning tendency or want of equally vigorous growth on the part o'f
i compared with ii. Beneath the spiracle, the tubercles not infre¬
quently show tendency to combine. Above it, on the alxlominal s <v/-
ments, the tendency is not for combination, but for the atrophy of one
or the other pair, while on the thoracic segments it seems to be
towards approximation in a single transverse band, if not to actual
combination.

Now as to the value, for classificatory purposes, of the position of

the thoracic dorsal tubercles in the different groups. In all the
upright egg groups but one that I have examined, the meso- and
meta-thoracic dorsal tubercles are in a transverse band, the two
innermost being probably usually i and the outer ones ii. In the
Hat egg groups the position is with some groups (e.y., Geometers) the
same as in the upright egg groups before mentioned, but in others
there are an anterior and a posterior pair. The following list of the
few species I have been able to refer to will, I hope, convey some idea
of the position : —

Upright Egg Species.

(1) With meso- and meta-thoracic dorsal tubercles set as anterior
and posterior pairs: ( Hepialns / Inpulinus ; ? is this to be considered
an upriyht or a flat egg). Lemonia ( Crateronyx ) dumi ; i and ii set
at corners of an oblong, iii a twin tubercle.

(2) With meso- and meta-thoracic dorsal tubercles set in transverse
line. Butterflies : — Colias ht/ale , line hide cardamines (iii bears two
hairs). Notodontidae : ('nethocampa jrityocampa, Xotodonta trepida
(iii duplicated in A . trepida). lAparidae : Dasychira pudibunda,
Notolophus antiqua. Syntomis : .S', pheyea (iii appears to be two¬
haired on abdominals; I cannot make out on thoracic). Nola:
.V. cvcullatella. Noctnids : Caradrina ambiyna, Heliophobus hispidus,
Cucnllia absinthii, A.rylia patris, Graphiphora populeti, Arnphipyra
pyramidea, Catocala promissa (iii double). E panda lichenea and

liUulenta (? iii duplicated, the two hairs on separate plates, one
much weaker than the other). Also a doubtful species, probably
Bryophila.

(3) Meso- and meta-thoracic tubercles, with bases close together or
on same plate. Butterfly : — Xemeobins lacina (i and ii, although
separated at base, are very close together). Thyris fenestrata (i and ii
on same plate ; iii double-haired). Spilosoma urticae (i and ii
conjoined).

Flat Egg Species.

(1) With meso- and meta-thoracic dorsal tubercles set as an anterior

and posterior pair.

(A) Separated by a wide gap, anteriors well to front of segment ;
many Lachneid species : Eutriclia qnercifolia, C'osmotriche
potatoria, Maerothylacia rain, etc.

(I>) Not widely separated, but situated on separate sub-segments,

i in front of ii ; some Sphingids : Eamorphinae (Choero-
campa) poreellus, elpenor ; Phryxids ( Deilephila ) yallii,
eupliorbiae (iii bears two seta?).

ii outer as well as posterior to i : Adscita (lno) statices :
Anthrocera (Zyyaena) lonicerae, trifblii, jilipendulae ; Ptero-
phoridae : Aciptilia yalactodactyla, ( Edetnatofdiorns litho-
dactylns, Mimaeseoptilas phaeodactylas (iii bears two setie).

(2) With meso- and meta-thoracic tubercles having their bases

touching or conjoined.

(A) i directly in front of ii ; some Sphingids : Sphinx liynstri
and pinastri, Sesia stellatarmn, Hemaris fncifonnis ; Atnor-
phinae : A morph a populi, Mimas tibiae, Smerinthus ocellata
(iii bears two setie).

(B) i and ii on same wart ; some Pterophoridae : Uxyptilns

(B)

(C)

teucrii (on same wart). ? Adptilia pentad actyla (it is
possible, but unlikely, that ii is lost).

(3) With meso- and ineta- thoracic tubercles set transversely.

(A) i and ii on same plate: Zeusera pyrina, Aeyeria sphcyiforinis
(in bears two setie), A. tipulifunnis (iii bears two setie),
1 eiehubia verhuellella.

l and ii bases close together : My dots cribrdla (i and ii very
close, i inner and very slightly in front of ii) ; Pterophoridac :
/ latyptilia yonud actyla (bases touching, iii is duplicated),
i and u bases separated and widely separated Psyehids :
I achythdia rillosdla. Geometers : Phorodesma smaraydaria,
beometra paptlionaria. Drepanids : Drepana unyuicula
[cult car i a).

My knowledge of the difference is too recent, and the species
examined are, perhaps, too few to allow of sound generalisations, but
a tew remarks on the subject, with the idea of getting further informa¬
tion or help from outside sources, may not be out of place.

Let me first deal with the duplicate hairs of iii. This is not a
character for which I have previously kept a look-out, and I have
probably overlooked it in many of the species that I have examined.
It occurs in the Hat egg races that have both types of dorsal arrange¬
ment, and is probably a generalised character lingering on in many
species or groups of lepidoptera. '

1 he dorsal tubercles on meso- and ineta- thoracic segments, in all
the upright egg species examined, save one, are either in transverse
line, or consolidated. The exception, Lentmia (( rateronyj) dumi, does
not, so tar as 1 am aware, belong to any of the four large groups that
1 “m we}1 acquainted with, viz., Butterflies, Noctuids,' Notodonts
or Arc t nds (I use this term in its widest sense as including Hyntonm
and the Liparids) ; and the fact of its possessing two setie on tubercle
ni of these segments, suggests that it may very possibly be an early
offshoot from the primitive stock which gave rise to the families
tU i.n" ^ One large, and probably very homogeneous

section of the Hat egg races, the Geometrids, has, I believe throughout
the transverse arrangement, for although I have only adduced evidence
ot two species, my memory asserts that it is the case with all the
other geometnd larva; that 1 have seen.

I have examined and taken notes of larvie of Teickobia verhuellella
and Myelois cribrdla only among the large group of lepidoptera known
as • Micros. They have their tubercles set transversely, and from Dr.
Dyar s writings, 1 understand that this is very general throughout the
Micro- Lepidoptera. Zcuzera pyrina and .Kycria epher/iformu have the
two setie set transversely, l and ii being on a single plate but some
distance apart. Dr. Dyar has figured the tubercles on meso- and
meta-thorax of CVm«* conus, and the position of the setie is also trans¬
verse, but no plate is shown. I would hazard a guess that most of
the other lepidopterous wood-borers, other than Hepialids, will be
found to have tins or some closely similar arrangement.

W lth the Psyehids the thoracic segments are very greatly modified,
he entire segments being plated over on the dorsal area, and, owin-
to this specialisation, the character is, with this group, of doubtful
importance, but so far as 1 have been able to determine, the arrange-

. • v ,/v lilt

rnent is transverse, at any rate on the true Psyehids, althom

Inn e

a note on larvae of i\ ary via mondifera that needs confirmation, in which
I wrote that the arrangement was trapezoidal . • • . on meso- and meta¬
thorax as on the abdominal segments.

In Anthrocera (Zygjenids) and Adscita (lno), the arrangement is
trapezoidal, i in front of ii, as on the abdominal segments; in these
families, however, the anterior and posterior pairs are not widely
separated, owing to the compressed nature of the segments. Dr.
Chapman kindly gave me some young larvae of Heteroyynis paraduxa,
but primary hairs are difficult to determine on the thoracic segments,
owing to the presence of secondary tubercles. With the Pterorphorina
or “ Plumes,” we get a divergence in position within the group, but I
have examined so few larvae that I cannot as yet say how wide or far
the rift extends. In Platyptilia yunudactyla the position of the dorsal
tubercles on meso-thorax is transverse, with their bases conjoined, but
on the meta-thorax, although still set transversely, the bases do not
touch, but are still close together. Mimaeseoptilus phaeodactylm has
them (the setie) set one in front of the other trapezoidally, i inner and
anterior, ii outer and posterior ; they are, however, close together,
closer than is the case on the abdominal segments, and it is doubful if
their bases, which are somewhat large, actually touch. Here I would
suggest tentatively, until a more adequate quantity of material has
been examined, that the characters in question (i.e.. the position of the
dorsal tubercles on the meso- and meta-thoracic segments), are of con¬
siderable importance ; not as indicating relationship (in any but the
wide general sense, of a tendency, probably throughout the Lepidoptera,
to a reduction in the size and importance of the thoracic segments
during the larval stage, with the consequent crowding or consolidation
of tubercles), but as a guide, pointing out the distance to which the
initial tendency of specialisation has been carried in different stirpes,
or, stated somewhat differently, whether the groups quitted the main
stream prior or subsequent to the time when this character had reached
its zenith ; the fact of both positions occurring within the limits of a
homogeneous group, such as the Plumes or the Hawk-moths appear
to be, being evidence of an early division from the main stream, and
subsequent independent development. Now I am of opinion that the
stirps giving rise to the Lachneids, Saturniids, Endromids, Aylia,
Ceratocampids, Hornby. v, Sphingids, etc., as well as that which gave
rise to the Pteropho rules, belongs to this category ; the trend of the
larvae in respect of the reduction of the thoracic segments not having
reached its full strength when they branched from the main stream.

Some of the Saturniid larvae bear on their meso- and meta-thoracic
segments, forked processes, analogous to, but differing from, the 8th
abdominal central horn in the direction of their forks or branches. In
Hyperchina io, both the dorsal and supra-spiracular tubercles of the
meso- and meta-thoracic segments bear processes or horns, the forks
of which are set longitudinally, while those of the 8th abdominal horn
are set transversely, pointing, as I think, to the direction in which the
coalescence of the bases of the original tubercles occurred, the caudal
horn being derived from the joined and elevated bases of i + i (both
anterior trapezoidals) on the 8th abdominal segment, while the two
dorsal horns or pillars which occur on both the meso- and meta-
thoracic segments are evolved from i and ii on either side, and the
forked character of the supra-spiracular derives its forks in all proba¬
bility from the original duplicate character of iii.

In Ladmeides, the large size of the supra-spiracular warts on the
thoracic segments of many species is probably also a sign of the dual
character of iii in the stirps.

With ('itheronia, probably, and certainly with A gl ia tan, the
character and meaning of the thoracic horns or processes, is, I take it,
entirely different from those of the Saturniids proper. With A. tau,
so far as my observation goes, the anterior and posterior dorsal
thoracic tubercles do not combine to join the horns, those on the
dorsum of the meta-thorax being developments of i alone, while the
foremost pair of horns is placed on the pro-thorax, and not the meso-
thorax, as with Satumia ( H . io). I believe that this difference also
applies to Citheronia, but have not yet had larvae for examination.

With Dimurpha versicolor a, the meso- and meta-thoracic tubercles
are in a single row, and consist of warts bearing several hairs, probably

i and ii dorsal, iii is a wart of about equal size, and the wart below the
spiracle is probably iv and v.

I regret to say that my notes on Bombgx mori were made long
before 1 realised the value of the difference between thoracic and
abdominal tubercles, and the hairs on the only preserved larvte (in 1st
instar), that I possess, are too confused to enable one to judge of their
position.

I trust that these few notes on the position of the dorsal meso- and
meta-thoracic tubercles will enable my readers to form some idea of
the probable value of this character as a means of separating the
Sphingids into two main divisions: (a) in which the larvar: have the
dorsal tubercles on these segments set as anterior and posterior, i and

ii being on separate sub-segments; and (If) in which they are on the
same sub-segment, i and ii having their basis conjoined, or the two
setie being on a single plate.

Classification on this character, it will be seen, throws the
Eumorphid ( Choerocampa ) and Phri/xid (Deilephila) groups into A,
while Sji/un.r, Ainurphids, Hemaridx, Sesiids (Macrogloxxidx) fall into
group J> — in contrast to the more usual grouping in which the
Awor/diids are treated as one group, and the swift-flying and feeding
species as another.

There is, however, a feature peculiar to Amorphid larvie which
distinguishes them from larvae of any of the other groups known to
me. I refer to the coat of secondary hairsl which is present in the
1st stadium of Amorphid larvae, but which does not appear until
after the first moult in larvae of the other groups. Although this
feature is a far more striking one than that upon which 1 have based
my divisions A and 11, it is to my thinking of much less importance,
consisting at best of the acquirement of a secondary specialisation at
an earlier stage, whereas the position of the dorsal tubercles on
meso- and meta-thoracic, although apparent only in the 1st
stadium, is in no way altered, so far as 1 have been able to observe,
by subsequent moults, but ceases to be noticeable, owing to the
reduction in size of the primary setie and the consequent difficulty of

* They must be examined in 1st stadium, as after the 1st moult the primary
hairs degenerate and become obscured by secondary characters.

t lieferred to as Shagreen hairs by Prof. E. B. Poulton, and Mammillary hairs
by Dr. T. A. Chapman, on account of their raised bases, which form so characteristic
a feature of some larvee, especially those of Smerinthus.

distinguishing them from the numerous secondary tubercles, bearing
setie, that are indistinguishable after the second moult or there¬
abouts. In fact, so little does this 1st stadium appearance of
secondary hairs in Amorphids (Smerinthids) impress me from a
c-lassificatory point of view, that I doubt if it affords good grounds for
giving the Amorphinae group greater value than the other groups
in B.

_ What it does afford evidence of, I submit, in spite of the weighty
objections of Dr. Chapman to this view, is that the larva of Amor¬
phinae is a more specialised and not more primitive form. There may
or may not be a coat of minute spicules on a Sphingid larva, but these,
although possibly, or, perhaps, probably, the original source from
which the secondary hairs were developed, are not now in any way cor¬
related, so far as I am aware, although there may be a closer affinity
between spicules and the bristly setae on horn in the 1st stadium.

I he secondary hairs do not appear until after the first moult, except
in Amorphid (Smerinthid) lame, and appear to be analogous to those
of Lachneid and Dimorphid (Endromid) larvae, especially in regard to
the development of pigmented specks, or spots surrounding their
bases. The bases of these hairs in many, if not all, the Sphingid lame
are raised to a greater or less extent in one or more stadia. In this
form they are especially characteristic of Amorphid (Smerinthid), and
to a less extent of Ilernarid lame. Accompanying the raised base
is the pigmented spot above referred to. This is usually of a pale, if
vivid hue, in the Sphingids, and reaches its zenith, among the few larva'
1 have seen, among the Phryxids. It is also noticeable in lamp of
Dimorpha versicolora and some Lachneid lame, but as dark instead of
pale spots. It may not, perhaps, be out of place to call attention
here to the persistent character of these spots on lame of all three
groups, as they are frequently found standing out in sharp contrast
to the general body colour, and even to specialised markings. In
lli/les euphorbia e, wherever the black (a late feature) encroaches on
the primitive green or yellow it does so at first as streaks or dots at
mid distance between the hair bases, as though the area surround¬
ing the hair base were distinct from the general skin surface, and,
as a character of old standing, were antagonistic to later develop¬
ments. This development of dark pigmentation along the lines of
least resistance, as it were, produces the tesselated pattern of the dark
forms of Eumorphid (Chcerocampid) larva?, and its influence may be
traced in some Sphinx larvae, for instance, Hyloicus pinastri, and the
dark form of Ayr ins convolvuli, where the dark pigment will be found
chiefly as dark streaks at the juncture of the sub-segments (i.e., fur¬
thest from the hair bases, as these are usually situated or more
strongly developed at the ridge of sub-segment). In Amorphids
(Smerinthus) this growth of secondary hairs extends over the whole
body in the first larval stadium, and is so dense as to give the larvae
a doormat-like appearance, the hairs being stiff, bristly, and compara¬
tively long, compared with their development in later stages ; the
primitive seta* only being determinable on account of their greater size.
The hairs in this 1st stadium of Amorphinae (Smerinthus) * appear much

* For the best description of these hairs in Amorphinae (Smerinthids), see
Dr. T. A. Chapman’s detailed notes on pages 388, 389 of vol. iii. of Tutt’s British
Lepidoptera.

more numerous than the 2nd stadium developments of the other Sphingid
groups, except perhaps Hermans, which is very Amorphid as regards
this character ; and in Amorphinae it is a portion only of these hairs
which develops the mammillary bases, the remainder undergoing no
further development but a gradual atrophy, as do the actual seta* on
the mammillary bases themselves. Hemaris tityus | forms a link
between the Amorphinae, and the other Sphingid groups in respect of
the development of these secondary hairs. It has, as with the other
groups, the primitive 1st stadium that is wanting in Amorphinae, the pri¬
mary seta; standing out clearly and alone on the bare skin surface. The
absence of secondary hairs in Hemaris is the more accentuated by
reason of the large size and the highly forked character of the
primaries ? i, ii, iii, iv and v, while in its 2nd stadium the usual Sphingid
change of the primary hairs being replaced by a coat of secondaries, is
also rendered more remarkable by the contrast between the unusual
size of the 1st skin primary hairs and the enormous reduction in their
size which takes place after the moult ; they can only be detected
from the secondaries, which they closely resemble, by their slightly
larger size. In H. tityus, however, instead of the secondary coat being
but poorly developed, and of a more or less evanescent character, as is
normally the case; it is dense and very strongly developed, and persists
until larval maturity. II. tityus in its 2nd stadium is more Amorphid
(Smerinthid) than Amorphinae ( Smerinthus ) itself, in respect of the
density of growth, size and forkedness of the bristles; while the 3rd
instar of H. tityus is hut little more advanced in respect of the waning
of these features, and the development of the bases of certain hairs
into mammillae than the 1st of Amorphinae (Smerinthus), and is
certainly not so advanced as Amorpha popuii in its 2nd instar. The
bearing of the above notes on the question whether the smooth -skinned
larvie having only the primary seta; present, or those of Amorphinae
with their dense growth of secondary hairs in 1st in star, are to he
considered as the more primitive form of Sphingid caterpillars, is, 1
think, clear and conclusive.

The argument that, because the caudal horn bears a bristly
coat in the 1st instar of the larvae of all groups, it therefore follows
that this coat at one time covered the entire body, to he subsequently
lost on the 1st skin of those of all the groups but Amorphinae, where its
retention is a sign of the generalized nature of the group, is, I think,
quite unwarranted. It is difficult to imagine why the larva should
develope a dense growth of bristles in its 1st instar, and at a subsequent
period lose it entirely on the body but retain it on the horn, and then,
after a naked stadium, redevelop or partially redevelop it in a later
instar. Besides, the course of ontogeny in Sphingid lame, as we at
present know them, towards nakedness is to lose not only the second¬
ary, but the primary hairs as well ; hut the primary setie in the 1st
instar of, say, Sphinx liyustri, are not by any means atrophied. It
would seem, therefore, that a change which swept away the secondary
hairs from the body surface as apart from the horn, and yet left the
primaries intact, would he, to say the least of it, a remarkable one, and
must have been quite separate and unconnected with the present trend

+ For my full notes on larvie of Hemaris tityus see vol. iv. of Tult’s British
Lepidoptera, now in the press.

in the direction of nakedness, which is exemplified in the ontogeny of
most Sphingid larvae. Again, the very fact of the horn alone being
left with its coat of bristles intact, suggests that they were an older
character in that situation than elsewhere as a reason for their persist¬
ence ; an explanation which would, so far as I understand it, sweep
away the principal argument in favour of their having originally
occupied the whole skin surface. It would seem just as probable that
they should be first developed on the horn, as that the thoracic seg¬
ments of some Lachneids should be ahead of the abdominal ones in
the development of their hairy covering.

A Classification of British Sphingids on Larval Characters.

First stage pale, with greenish tinge ; a larger or shorter caudal
born on 8th abdominal segment, bearing tubercles i on summit ;
primary tubercles single-haired, except iii of meso- and meta-thoracic
segments, which bear two seta? ; bases of secondary hairs frequently
developed into mammillre, and sometimes pigmented (one or both of
these characters usually well developed in middle 3rd or 4th instars),
v normally situated as pre-spiraeular towards anterior margin of
segment, iv wanting on meso- and meta-thoracic segments. Abdo¬
minal segments with eight sub-divisions.

(A) Dorsal tubercles i and ii on meso- and meta-thoracic segments

set as anterior and posterior on separate sub-segments ; an
enlarged 1st sub-segment, consisting of three of the normal
sub-divisions ; hairs simple-ended or knobbed, not bifid.

(I.) With 1st and 2nd abdominal segments swelled and the
thoracics retractile within them ; well developed eye spots
on 1st and 2nd abdominal segments (adult characters).

(a) i. Fairly developed caudal horn, Hip-potion eelerio.

ii. Small caudal horn, Kamorpha elpenor.

iii. Caudal horn absent in all stages, Theretra porcellus.

(II.) Without swelled 1st and 2nd abdominal segments, and

producing rudimentary ocellated spots on many or all
segments.

(a) i. With single row of ocellated spots, Phryxus livornica.

ii. With double row of ocellated spots, Celerio gallii,
euphorbia e

(B) Dorsal tubercles on meso- and meta-thoracic segments with

bases conjoined or touching, situated on the same sub-
segment ; no enlarged first sub-segment ; hairs in some
groups more or less forked (bifid).

(I.) With forked hairs, but without tumid thoracic segments.

(a) Primitive setse only in 1st instar, except on horn.

i. With bifid character of hairs less strongly developed in

1st stadium, Sesia stellatarum.

ii. With bifid character of hairs much accentuated in 1st
stadium.

a. Hairs pale green, Hemaris fuciformis.

p. Hairs black, Hemaris tityus.

(b) With dense coat of slightly bifid secondary hairs in 1st

stadium, and more or less triangular heads in later stadia.

* This species has iv and v on 1st abdominal segment situated on a small oval
plate beneath spiracle. This may prove to be a special feature of the species and
its variants, or more probably it is a charatcer of the group ii.

i. Head rounded in 1st stadium, 7th oblique stripe
strongly developed, Mimas tiliae.

ii. Head variable in 1st stadium, 7th oblique stripe
strongly developed, Smerinthus occllata.

iii. Head triangular in 1st stadium, 1st and 7th oblique
stripes strongly developed, Amorpha populi.

(II.) Larva? with slightly tumid and translucent-looking thoracic
segments in later stadia ; forked hairs ill-developed, if
present.

(o) With stiff-pointed curved caudal horn.

i. Markedly forked in 1st stadium, Hyloicm pinastri.

ii. Not markedly forked in 1st stadium, Sphinx lif/ustri.

iii. A;/ rius convolvuli .

( b ) With peculiar downward-curved rough horn, Mamluca
atropos.

AN EASTER HOLIDAY IN SOUTH AMERICA.

(Communicated by A. F. BAYNE, November 18tli, 1902.)

I had really intended to write you before a few short notes on my
Easter holidays this year, my ten days’ absence being to a certain ex¬
tent occupied with entomology, in case they might interest you. I
left here about a week before Good Friday, and travelled via Mendoza
to Puente del Inca. The journey from Buenos Ayres to Mendoza is a
tedious one, taking two nights and a day, the train leaving here at
about ten p.m. Until the middle of the next day no trace of a hill
and hardly, even, a rise in the ground is to be seen — nothing but the
open “ pampa ” and “lagunas” (large shallow pools), the latter
crowded with waterfowl, swans, geese, flamingoes, with ducks and
moorhen innumerable. On nearing Villa Mercedes, however, solitary
“kopjes” appear, and then, in the distance, the line of the Sierras
extending northwards towards Cordoba. On arriving at Mendoza,
where I joined my brother Will, on the second morning, the scene
changes, and as the sun rises you see first the foothills near the town,
then the Uspallata range, and beyond a glimpse of Aconcagua and some
of the other high peaks of the Andes. The Transandine from Mendoza
to Puente del Inca is a narrow gauge line, constructed, in the steeper
gradients, with a central toothed rail, it follows the valley of the
Rio Mendoza, which it crosses and recrosses many times, through the
Uspallata by a narrow gorge, and then into the main chain of the
Cordillera. With the exception of a far off view of the high lands
near the Brazilian coast, this was my first experience of mountains.
1 have not been in the Alps, but the Andes between Mendoza and the

Chilian frontier present, none of the beauty you read of in connection
with the former. There is a grandeur, but it is the grandeur of deso¬
lation and of the world in making. Trees are absent, and beyond
Uspallata there is little vegetation of any kind, rain scarcely ever
falling in the main range, but, I believe, after the melting of the
winter snows a wealth of wild flowers springs from the ground in the
valleys. The foothills are covered with cacti and other plants. A
great part of the mountains may be described as peaks and ridges of
bare rock above, with below a heap of debris, stacked at a slope at
which it will not stand safely, and, as a consequence, continually
slipping and falling in avalanches or coming down in “ mud runs.”
Aconcagua itself is a little disappointing, being a huge and rather

shapeless mass of rock, but Tupungato, a volcano, is typical of our _

°r > perhaps, 1 should say my — original idea of a mountain, the moun¬
tain of the picture-books we see in childhood and remember ever after,
cone-shaped, white at the summit, and, when seen with the rising sun,'
of perfect loveliness. We stayed at the Puente, close to the wonder¬
ful natural bridge you have, no doubt, read of, for three or four days,
and did a little collecting at the height above the sea of from, I sup¬
pose, 7,000 to 9,000 feet, in the valley towards Aconcagua, distant
about ten miles. Three kinds of butterflies were taken, and a good
many others seen, but any exertion is very difficult at the altitude, °and
our captures were, therefore, not so numerous as they would have been
on lower ground. The first was a (Julias (one $ and one $ ), a grand
fellow, with a broad black band on the forewings, the male dark yellow
and the female white ; the second a Pierid, in form almost a little
Tatoddla autodice, Hb.; the third an Aryynnis, small and pale coloured.
The last-named gave us some occasion for thought. It is a strange
thing, in the midst of the Cordillera, and far away from the old coun¬
try, in the shade of Aconcagua, on the side of a hill having the con¬
tour of a chalk down, with a tiny lake at the foot, chasing a small
fritillary amongst the stones and boulders, indistinguishable to the
inexperienced eye from the A . euphrosyne or selme (although, perhaps, the
resemblance is really greater to A. latlwnia), and with a ( 'alias on the
wing the very image of C. eilwsa. But I must notallow myself to
wander into attempting to describe the course of the river Mendoza,
which, starting from the foot of the snow, runs through a gorge,'
narrow in many places, especially in the sierra of Uspallata, then&is
diverted to irrigate and fertilize the vineyards, containing one-seventh
part of solid matter ; or the Cordillera itself, with rocks of varied
tints — purple, white, red, or greenish in the sunshine — the sunsets,
the valleys by moonlight, the play of the lightning behind the peaks
at night, or the bishop of stone sleeping in his mitre, whose head
closed the valley to the east.

We left the Inca again the day before Good Friday (the weather
had turned cold, and snow lay everywhere until the sun was high),
reaching Mendoza at night. We started again on the Saturday morn¬
ing, and spent a great part of that day at Tunuyan, visiting the
river of that name — a glorious locality for insects. Imagine
the old bed of a broad stream with high banks, deep pools
here and there, tall rushes, bushy scrub (monte), large patches
of aromatic shrubs — the bog myrtle of the country — with the
peaks of the snow mountains far to the west, and you have

Tunuyan. The river runs swiftly across one end of the hollow, mud-
coloured, is lost in the marshes of the “ pampa,” to appear again, it
is said, in the south, and help to swell the Rio Colorado. Here
among many kinds of butterflies were captured for the first time
Anartia iatrupae, L., Tatochila mlocemi, Capron, Lycaena hanno, Holl.,
Asychis cerialis, Cram ; together with a good many of the species met
with here, as Pamphila phylaens, Drury, Lycaeua (.') casaias, Thccla
eurytyulus, Hb., 'Terms (leva, Dbl., and var. minor, Berg, C alias lesbia,
Fb., etc. Elegant dragon flies, hornets, wasps, and beetles were
abundant, and besides a good many of these, we took a pair of grey
and white footmen, reminding one of Coscinia cribnun (the Ringwood
one), several noctuae, and a Macaria resembling closely M. alternate.

in addition to the list of insects taken at the Puente, we saw
several examples of a fine dark-brown butterfly with a slow flight, a
yellow Colias, a black skipper, and a painted lady or small brightly
coloured Vanexsa. Two or three noctme, one an Agrotid, were also
taken, and one night at dusk a number of a large species of geometer,
superficially like Selieloxenia pi uni a Ha, were flying over some low
thorny bushes. Up to the present I have been unable to identify any
of the Cordillera insects.

LIST OF DESIDERATA FOR THE SOCIETY’S

CABINET.

lepidoptera.

P. Dapl id ice
A. Lathonia
P. C-album
E. Antiopa
P. Iris

N. Semiargus

L. Avion
D. Galii
D. Lineata

C. Celerio

D. Nerii

H. Tityus (Bombyliformis)
-E . Myopceformis
-E . Formiciformis

M. Asiliformis

.E. Ichneumon iformis
/E. Cynipiformis
M. Allan tiformis
•E. Spheciformis
/E. Scoliseformis
-E. Chrysidiformis
T. Bembecit'ormis
M. Castaneas
H. Asellus
Z. Exulans
L. Pygmosola

E. Striata (Grammica)

E. Cribrum

D. Pulchella

O. Fascelina

L. Coenosa
T. Cratffigi

M. Castrensis
G. llicifolia

P. Harpagula

C. Bifida
G. Crenata

N. Tritophus
N. Bicolora

D. Dodonea
B. Fluetuosa
B. Duplaris
B. Ocularis

•J. Algte
T. Tridens

A. Strigosa
A. Auricoma
A. Menyanthidis
S. Musculosa
H. Vitellina
H. Obsoleta

H. L-album

S. Maritima
N. Neuriea
N. Coneolor
N. Cannte

X. Conspicillaris

L. Exigua

P. Leucophsea
A. Corticea
A. Cinerea
A. Aquilina
A. Prsecox
A. Obscura

T. Subsequa
A. Depuncta
A. Subrosea
A. Sobrina

P. Hyper borea
P. Leucographa
G. Populeti
G. Erythrocephala
D. Rubiginea
J. Croceago

I. Retusa
C. Pyralina
V. Oleagina

M. Satura
M. Exulis
M. Perigrina
T. Atriplicis

C. Polyodon (Perspieil-
laris)

L. Semibrunnea
L. Socia

C. Scrophulariae
C. Lyclmitis
C. Asteris
C. Gnaphalii
C. Absinthii
C. Chamomillse
H. Armigera

A. Cordigera
E. Ostrina

B. Notha
P. Chryson
P. Moneta

P. Interrogationis
P. Bractea

S. Anomala

C. Fraxini

N. Lunaris
E. Erosaria

D. Obfuseata
M. Cineraria
P. Fuliginaria

T. Papilionaria
C. Orbicularia
L. Contiguaria
A. Cireellata
P. Straminata
R. Sacraria

E. Filigrammaria
P. Affinitata

P. Alchemillata
P. Teeniata
C. Sparsata
L. Halterata
T. Cognata (Simulata)
H. Ruberata
A. Cuculata
A. Derivata
P. Fluviata
C. Lapidata
C. Polygrammata.

E. Silaceata
L. Prunata

W. ILSTON COX,

Hon. Curator.

PRESENTED

City

of Conbon (Entomological A* Haturul
History Society.

THIS SOCIETY was founded in 1858 under the title of the
“ Haggerston Entomological Society.” and has striven, for nearly
half a century, to diffuse the knowledge of Natural History,
particularly of Entomology. It has taken an active part in the
preservation of Epping Forest and other similar movements for the
public good, and also in the suitable housing of the famous “ Double¬
day Collection ” of Lepidoptera. Its own particular work includes
the reading of papers, discussions, and exhibitions, and a special
feature of recent years has been the compilation of a London Fauna
List, now being published in the Transactions.

The meetings are held on the first and third Tuesdays in each
month, from 7.80 to 10 p.m., at the London Institution, Finsbury Circus,
E.C., which is easily accessible from all parts ; the Meeting-room is
exceptionally comfortable and well lighted, and no effort is spared
to make the evenings pleasant and profitable. An annual Summer
Excursion is arranged by the Society, and occasional Conversazioni.
Visitors are welcomed to all the meetings.

There is a good library, containing, amongst other works, the
“ Zoologist,” “ Entomologist," “ Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine,” &c.,
from their commencement, and also reference collections of Lepidoptera
and Coleoptera, to which it is hoped other Orders may be added from
time to time.

An Entomological “ Exchange Club ” is now in process of formation
under the auspices of the Society.

The entrance Fee is Two Shillings and Sixpence, and the Annual
Subscription Seven Shillings and Sixpence, payable in advance, both
being purposely kept low in order that all may avail themselves of the
benefits the Society offers. The Society therefore looks with confidence
for the support of all who are interested in the study of Natural
History.

Further information may be obtained from either of the Hon.
Secretaries.

».r«t

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Books

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "Transactions of the City of London Entomological & Natural History Society."

See other formats