Skip to main content

Full text of "Treasure acres : official Montana Soil Conservation news bulletin"

See other formats


$5  Montana  Stale  Library 

333,7^ 
Sb~C  _  '3  0864   1004   5751    7 


une 


it 


:.ient$ 


cres 


* 


\ 


* 


i) 


Leslie  Criswell 

NACD  PUBLIC  LANDS  SURVEY 

Montana  SWCD  Districts  are  working  hard  on 
the  survey  being  conducted  by  the  Public  Lands 
Committee  of  the  National  Association.    The 
following  suggestions  are  made  to  expedite 
getting  this  job  done:    1)   Take  a  copy  of  Form 
#2  together  with  a  copy  of  the  instructions  and 
definitions  to  each  agency  having  Public  Land 
in  your  district.    Ask  them  to  fill  out  the  form 
and  then  meet  with  your  board  at  one  of  your 
meetings  10  agree  on  the  final  figures  for  their 
lands.    2)   It  is  suggested  that  this  survey  be 
done  on  a  county  basis  as  most  agencies  already 
have  figures  on  a  county  basis.    Where  more  than 
one  district  is  in  a  county,  these  districts  should 
get  together  on  this  project.    3)   This  survey 
should  be  completed  and  sent  to  Executive 
Secretary,  Montana  Soil  Conservation 
Committee,  School  of  Mines,  Butte,  by  October. 
4)   A  Form  #2  should  be  filled  out  for  state 
lands.    This  may  be  a  big  project  in  some 
districts.    5)   The  Conservation  Needs  Inventory 
recently  completed  by  all  districts  will  provide 

Continued  on  Page  3 


Your  Association  President  Sez: 

The  Bureau  of  Land  Management  is  desirous  of 
helping  the  SWCD's  in  Montana  in  filling  out 
sheet  No.  2  of  the  Public  Lands  questionnaire 
for  the  NACD  survey.    The  BLM  District 
Offices  in  their  areas  of  responsibility  are 
located  in  Malta,  Miles  City,  Billings, 
Lewistown,  Dillon,  and  Missoula.    Your  Area 
Conservationist  can  help  your  District  to  con- 
tact the  BLM  District  Office  in  your  area.    It 
will  facilitate  completion  of  the  questionnaire  by 
SCD's  if  a  board  member  can  discuss  it  with  a 
BLM  representative  since  they  have  made  some 
good  progress  on  conservation  planning  and  have 
much  valuable  information. 

The  Goodyear  Tire  &  Rubber  Company  is  one  of 
our  staunch  supporters  of  all  around  conservation. 
Their  awards  program  for  conservation  achieve- 
ments proves  this.    I  would  like  to  see  every  SCD 
in  Montana  enroll  in  this  program  as  an  added 
incentive  to  achieve  greater  goals  in  conservation. 
Besides,  the  benefits  derived  from  program 
planning  and  the  measuring  of  accomplishments 
at  the  end  of  the  program  year  are  invaluable. 
The  new  program  year  started  May  1  so  we  can 
get  an  early  start  in  the  1962  awards  competition. 
Just  a  card  to  Goodyear  Tire  &  Rubber  Company, 
Akron,  Ohio  can  enroll  your  District  in  the 
competition 

THE  SUMMER  DIRECTORS  MEETING  OF 
MASWCD  IS  SCHEDULED  FOR  JUNE  23,  IN 
LEWISTOWN. 

Area  V  of  NACD  is  meeting  in  Bismark,  North 
Dakota  June  14-15,  with  headquarters  in  the 
Grand  Pacific  Hotel.    North  Dakota  is  always  a 
gracious  host  and  there  is  an  exceptional  program 
planned  for  both  the  men  and  the  ladies.    If  at  all 
possible  have  your  District  represented  there  — 
it  is  a  good  meeting  of  good  people  with  problems 
just  like  yours. 


Executive  Secretary's  Report: 

Montana  State  Soil  Conservation  Committee 

In  my  travels  to  districts  about  the  state,  I 
observe  that  Montana  ranges  are  in  serious 
condition  due  to  overgrazing,  grasshoppers,   and 
drought  of  previous  years.    This  condition  of 
denuded  range  is  very  vulnerable  to  Soil  Eros- 
ion.   Ranchers  are  taking  a  big  chance  with  fast 
melting  snows,  heavy  rains  .cloudbursts,  and 
even  wind  erosion.    Water  cannot  be  properly 
conserved.    Allowing  these  overgrazed  conditions 
to  come  about  has  a  serious  effect  on  the 
community,    the  state,  and  the  nation.    Cost 
return  meetings  being  held  by  SCS  with  small 
groups  of  ranchers  tell  a  very  revealing  story, 
and  should  have  some  effect  to  motivate  ranchers 
to  practice  good  range  management.    There  is  a 
strong  need  for  close  follow  up  by  technicians 
with  cooperators,  to  counsel  with  them  on  their 
range  "management"  decisions.     People  do  funny 
things.    One  cooper ator  agreed  with  the  WUC 
that  he  should  cut  down  his  herd  by  50  head  for 
good  land  use,  and  to  make  the  most  profit. 
However,  when  the  grass  greened  up  in  the 
spring  he  bought  50  extra  head  and  continued  to 
overgraze! 

Only  about  10%  of  Montana  Ranchers  practice 
good  range  management.    Others  realize  but 
don't  practice  the  fact  that  grass  must  be  grown 
first  to  protect  the  soil  and  conserve  the  water; 
and  that  by  doing  so  they  increase  the  produc- 
tion potential  to  where  there  will  be  enough 
available  for  grazing.    Sometimes  this  takes 
years,  depending  on  conditions.    Many  ranchers 
don't  know  what  it  takes  to  grow  the  most  grass. 
Economic  conditions  are  also  deterrent  to  con- 
servation ranching,     A  rancher  faced  with 
mortgage  payments  fools  he  has  to  take  a  chance 
and  graze  that  protective  cover  and  turn  it  into 
cash:  or  he  has  ,i  short  term  lease  and  feels  he 
has  to  turn  I  ho  pnileolive  cover  into  cash;  or 
the  market  price  isn'l  just  right  and  he  can  sell 
for  more  by  holding  ;il  the  expense  of  over- 
grazing.   These  hit  unwise  range  management 
decisions. 

The  following  Bltilomeht  ol  a  Range  Technician 
shows  the  big  potential  Montana  has  in  regards 
to  development  of  our  livestock  industry: 

"There  are  lJ0,  000,  000  acres  in  Montana  of 
which  about  50,000,000  is  privately  owned 
rangeland. 

To  save  an  average  of  an  inch  of  rain  each  yum* 
over  all  rangeland  acres  in  Montana  should  pro- 
vide an  extra  200  lbs. of  forage  per  acre. 


Each  200  lbs  of  forage  should  produce  about 
80  lbs  of  beef  per  acre,  or  at  25£  per  pound 
this  equals  approximately  $2.  00  per  acre  for 
each  additional  inch  of  moisture  saved.    $2.00 
by  50  million  acres  -  $100,  000,  000.  00  that 
could  be  added  to  the  states  economy. 

If  the  50,  000,  000  acres  of  privately  owned 
rangeland  were  improved  one  range  condition 
class  it  would  carry  approximately  625,000 
more  animal  units  (cow  with  calf)  for  an  eight 
month  grazing  season  than  it  would  carry  in 
the  lower  range  condition  class.    At  only  one 
pound  of  gain  per  day  and  25<?  per  pound  this 
amounts  to  $37,  500,  000.  00  that  could  be  added 
to  the  States  economy  by  increasing  each  acre 
of  rangeland  one  condition  class.  "    Where  else 
can  we  add  so  much  to  the  State's  economy? 
We  have  only  to  induce  ranchers  to  do  the  job: 
How?    Here  are  some  suggestions: 

1.  Education 

a.  SWCD  education  committee  directing 
more  attention  to  range  management. 

b.  Possibility  of  extension  conducting 
range  management  classes  for  ranchers. 

c.  Extension  specialists  give  more  empha- 
sis to  Soil  and  Water  Conservation  as 
basic  to  production. 

d.  County  Agent  Supervisors  follow  close- 
ly range  management  activities  of 
County  Agent.    Assist  in  SWCD  and 
Co-operator  planning.    More  follow  up 
by  County  Agents  to  ranchers  on  how 
to  grow  grass  and  what  to  do  with  it. 

e.  4-H,  FFA,  all  schools  teach  pride  in 
land  for  living,  recreation. 

f.  Get  good  speakers  on  the  subject  talking 
it  up  to  farm  groups,  eivic  groups. 
More  in  local  newspapers,  radio.  TV. 
movies.    Stress  moral  values. 

2.  Program  &  Research 

a.  Cost  return  meetings  with  ranchers 
(educational  as  well  as  research) 

b,  More  follow  up  by  SCS  technicians 
especially  with  cooperators  who  take 
Ihnlr  ranch  plans  seriously,    (concen- 
trate on  few  rather  than  try  to  do  too 
lflwny  with  limited  technical  help 
available.) 


> 


c.  Give  greater  emphasis  to  deferred 
grazing.    More  liberal  with  ACP 
cost  sharing  for  deferred  grazing. 
(Maybe  we  have  been  wrong  in  stressing 
incentive  payments  for  permanent  type 
practices  rather  than  management, 
let's  look  at  this  again. ) 

d.  Costs  sharing  for  any  practice  by 
allowed  only  to  those  who  follow  a 
proper  stocking  rate,  management 
ranch  plan. 

e.  Grazing  Districts.    Where  individual 
units  are  small,  may  be  opportunity 
for  better  range  management  by  con- 
solidation, especially  if  public  lands 
or  absentee  ownership  lands  are 
involved  and  these  agencies  can't  give 
proper  long  term  leases  or  supervision 
as  regards  Soil  &  Water  Conservation, 
stocking  rates,  etc. 

f.  Land  use  Regulations!    Might  be  con- 
sidered under  a  strictly  100%  volun- 
tary cooperative  agreement  in  connec- 
tion with  a  grazing  District. 


Next  in  priority  as  a  major  conservation  pro- 
blem is  Irrigation  Water  Management.    Here 
again  probably  only  about  10%  of  the  farmers  are 
handling  their  water  correctly  for  greatest 
production  of  crops,  fish,  wildlife,  recreation'. 

A  majority  of  the  farmers  practice  good  farming 
practices  as  evidenced  by  better  yields  as  com- 
pared to  previous  years.    But  there  is  a  large 
minority  who  still  need  to  practice  contour 
farming,  strip  cropping,  stubble  mulching, 
grass  waterways,  etc. ,  to  prevent  extensive 
gully  and  sheet  erosion  &  wind  erosion  still 
occurring  in  Montana. 


r> 


r>  c 


> 


Public  Relations  &  Information 

a.     Exchange  information  with  stookgrowers 

organizations.    Invite  them  to  serve  on 

SWCD  Committees. 


b.  Get  our  repeated  articles  and  bulletins 
on  range  management  to  all  stockmen. 

c.  Recognize  all  people  who  practice  good 
range  management.  Get  their  name  in 
the  paper,  give  awards,  etc. 

d.  Keep  legislators,  governor  informed, 
planning  boards,  other  public  figures. 
Get  them  to  talk  conservation,  range 
management  benefits,  water  manage- 
ment benefits,  profits  realized  from 
good  land  use.    We  ourselves  should 
be  more  vocal'. 

4.        Legislative 

a.  Make  clear  to  legislators  the  impact 
good  range  management  has  on  the 
states  economy,  that  dollars  invested 
in  promoting  good  range  management, 
thru  our  schools,  our  SWCD's,  will 
repay  many  times  over. 

b.  Invite  legislators  to  SWCD  Committee 
meetings  or  to  serve  on  district  legis- 

p  lative  committees. 


Pictured  above  are  members  of  the  Hill  County 
SWCD,  Walter  Dion,  Raymond  Patrick,  Robert 
Hockett,  Chairman,  holding  a  copy  of  their 
recently  published  conservation  Needs  Inventory, 
Leo  Morse,  Herman  Krause,  Area  Conserva- 
tionist, Doug  Smith,  County  Agent  and  Secretary, 
Metro  Karaffa,  Work  Unit  Conservationist,  and 
Bob  Rasmus  sen,  County  Agent  Supervisor. 

This  board  meets  on  time,  the  chairman  conducts 
a  good  meeting  and  all  the  members  respond 
enthusiastically.    This  district  has  an  extensive 
tree  planting  operation  going  on.    The  WUC 
makes  a  report,  the  County  Agent  makes  a 
report.    Of  significance  is  the  interest  the 
County  Agent  Supervisor  and  the  Area  Conser- 
vationist give  districts  as  shown  by  their 
presence  here. 

******************** 

Public  Lands  Survey 
(Continued  from  Page  1) 

the  figures  for  questions  on  private  lands. 

Care  should  be  exercised  in  making  these 
figures  as  accurate  as  possible.    This  informa- 
tion will  prove  valuable  to  supervisors,  tech- 
nicians, County  Agents,  Research  people, 
schools,  etc. ,  and  your  association  in  planning 
and  carrying  out  the  Soil  and  Water  Conserva- 
tion job.    These  facts  are  needed  at  all  levels  of 
government.    They  will  make  your  job  easier. 


CONSERVATION  NEEDS  INVENTORY  BEING 
PUBLISHED  BY  MANY  DISTRICTS 

Publication  of  the  facts  found  by  a  Soil  and  Water 
Conservation  Needs  Inventory  of  non-federal 
lands  which  was  beguniin  1957  is  being  accom- 
plished by  many  of  Montana's  Soil  and  Water 
Conservation  Districts.    Most  districts  have 
these  bulletins  printed  locally  and  financed  by 
local  banks,  service  clubs,  or  other  interested 
organizations.    Some  are  mimeographed.    Most 
of  these  bulletins  contain  six  pages.     Pictures 
of  conservation  problems  and  accomplishments 
are  shown.    Facts  and  figures  concerning  Grass- 
lands, Woodlands,  Dry  Croplands,  Irrigated 
Croplands,  Watersheds  and  Wildlife  are  given. 

Districts  by  publishing  and  distributing  these 
facts  provide  valuable  information  to  supervisors 
and  conservationists  in  planning  district  programs 
of  work.    They  give  a  good  picture  of  the  Soil 
and  Water  Conservation  job  to  be  done.    Farmer, 
rancher,  legislators,  realtors,  banks, 
businesses  will  find  this  information  valuable  in 
planning  their  operations  inasmuch  as  they  con- 
cern our  basic  resource  of  Soil  and  Water  which 
properly  cared  for  and  developed  mean  much  to 
the  economy  of  any  community.    Students  in  high 
school  and  college  will  find  this  information 
valuable  reference  material.    Copies  of  these 
publications  can  be  had  by  writing  to  the  local 
Soil  and  Water  Conservation  District,  County 
Extension  Agent  for  their  county.    The  Soil 
Conservation  Service,  Box  855  Bozeman,  Montana 
has  a  publication  giving  a  composite  of  the  Con- 
servation needs  for  the  state  as  a  whole.    The 
state  publication  is  titled  "Montana  Soil  and 
Water  Conservation  Needs  Inventory"  January- 

1962. 

******************** 

MONTANA  CONSERVATION  COUNCIL 

"Time's  a  wasting'.     Has  your  district  bought 
complimentary  memberships  in  the  Montana 
Conservation  Council  for  outstanding  citizens  in 
your  district?    If  you  haven't,  you've  missed  an 
opportunity  and  failed  to  take  advantage  of  a 
bargain.    These  complimentary  memberships 
cost  only  $1.  00.    The  person  for  whom  you  pur- 
chase it  gets  a  year's  membership  in  the 
Montana  Conservation  Council  and  a  year's  sub- 
scription to  its  newsletter  ■    You  may  send  in  as 
many  names  as  you  wish  at  $1.  00  each.    Each 
person  whose  name  you  send  in  will  be  sent  a 
letter  from  the  Council  explaining  that  your 
district  has  bought  him  a  complimentary  mem- 
bership.   He  will  also  be  sent  literature  concerning 
the  Council. 

"If  ya  haven't  done  it  yet,  why  not  do  it  now?" 


MONTANA  CONSERVATION  COUNCIL  URGES 
STUDY  OF  MONTANA'S  RECREATIONAL 
POTENTIAL 

Members  of  Montana  Conservation  Council  met 
in  Butte  April  13-14  for  a  very  successful  annual 
meeting.    The  theme  "How  can  Montana  achieve  its 
Recreation  Potential"  brought  many  interesting 
discussions  concerning  recreation  development 
on  public  lands  and  private  lands  and  financing  of 
same. 

The  Council  agreed  that  a  further  study  should 
be  made  of  all  the  aspects  of'Outdoor  Recreation" 
for  its  development  in  Montana,  expecially  as 
concerns  private  lands.    Montana  has  many 
uncommitted  recreation  resources.    There  are 
proposals  of  federal  and  state  acquiring  recrea- 
tional land,  and  possibly  directing  it  Irom  its 
present  use.    An  inventory  of  available  resources 
or  potentials  on  private  lands  is  desired.    Pro- 
blems of  development  such  as  use  fees,  liabili- 
ties, tax  credits,  access  rights,  land  exchange, 
lease  of  recreation  rights,  recreation  districts, 
policing,  etc. ,  should  be  resolved. 

JUDITH  BASIN  SWCD  APPOINTS  WUC  TO  HEAD 
GRASS  SEEDING  ON  MISSILE  CABLE  LINES 

Edward  C.  Morgan,  WUC,  has  been  appointed  by 
Henry  Evans,  chairman  of  Judith  Basin  SWCD, 
to  head  the  Districts  efforts  in  encouraging  land      4 
owners  to  seed  disturbed  areas  on  Missile  Base 
Cable  lines  to  grass.    Morgan  is  working  with 
a  representative  of  General  Goldsworthy's 
command  at  Malmstrom  Air  Force  Base  on  such 
things  as  acquiring  information  of  land  occupiers 
concerned  and  amounts  of  land  needing  attention 
and  time  to  do  the  work.    Extension  service  is 
also  cooperating  in  informing  the  ranchers. 

GOODYEAR  AWARDS  FOR  1960-1961 

Score  Sheets  from  several  districts  for  the 
Goodyear  Awards  program  ending  April  30,   1962 
have  been  received  at  the  State  Soil  Conservation 
Committee  office  in  Butte.    These  will  be  turned 
over  th  the  judging  committee  June  5  for  judging 
and  winners  awarded  at  the  State  Convention  in 
November. 

All  districts  should  re-enroll  in  this  worthwhile 
program.    Any  district  that  enrolls  and  submits 
a  score  sheet  is  sure  to  at  least  be  given  an 
award  for  their  outstanding  cooperator  for  that 
year.    The  State  Committee  reminds  every  dis- 
trict if  they  haven't  already  submitted  their 
enrollment  card  for  this  year  they  can  still  do  so 
and  receive  the  necessary  materials  to  fill  out  a    M 
score  card.    Do  it  NOW!    You  Secretary's  , 
Chairman'. 


> 


Shown  above  are  members  of  the  Choteau  County 
SWCD.    Leland  Cade  is  County  Agent  and 
Secretary   Lee  Holstine,  WUC,  Bob  Anderson, 
Chairman,  Other  Members  are  Vade  Hamma, 
Vice  Chairman,  Fred  Fishbaugh,  Archie  Sheperd, 
Arnold  Engellant,  John  McLean,  Treasurer,  Rae 
Stevens,  Associate,  Roger  Van  Voast,  Associate, 
and  Wes  Lyons,  Associate.    Dave  Pearson  is 
Engineers  Aid.    Also  shown  above  at  the  right  is 
Vernon  Glascock,  ASC  County  Chairman,  who 
meets  regularly  with  the  board  and  gives  a  report. 
This  shows  good  relations.    This  board  is  another 
'^excellent  group.    They  use  associate  supervisors 
-^to  divide  up  the  work  load  and  get  better  repre- 
sentation.  Roadside  grass  seeding  has  been  a 
successful  project  in  this  district.    This  is  a 
cooperative  effort  involving  the  district,  Weed 
Board  and  County  Commissioners.    This  district 
at  present  has  386  cooperators  out  of  a  possible 
668  farms.    Of  these  302  have  conservation  plans. 


MEMORANDUM  OF  UNDERSTANDING  WITH  USDA 

Forms  for  Districts  to  use  to  execute  a  new 
Memorandum  of  Understanding  with  the  U.S. 
Dept.  of  Agriculture  will  be  sent  to  districts  by 
the  State  Soil  Conservation  Committee  soon  after 
July  1.    This  will  be  in  line  with  Secretary 
freeman's  suggestion  that  thie  Memorandum  of 
-Understanding  be  revised  to  include  additional 
conservation  services  which  USDA  now  provides 
districts. 


MONTANA  ASSOCIATION  SWCD  DIRECTORS  TO 

MEET  JUNE  23. 

The  mid-year  meeting  of  Directors  of  MASWCD 
will  be  Saturday  June  23  at  Lewistown.    The 
meeting  will  commence  at  10:00  a.m.    Some 
items  scheduled  for  action  are:    Deciding  what 
the  association  policy  should  be  on  Financing  of 
Districts,  how  money  should  be  raised,  how  much, 
and  what  it  should  be  used  for.    The  directors 
will  hear  reports  from  the  President,  the  Women's 
Auxiliary,  Committee  reports  on  Education, 
Public  Relations,  Finance  &  Budget,  Program  & 
Research,  Legislative,  Great  Plains,  Public  Lands 
&  Watershed. 

Supervisors  of  districts  should  inform  their  area 
directors  of  any  special  problem  they  want  action 
on.    Directors  are  Area  I  Morris  Billehus, 
Flaxville,  Oscar  Hippe,  Froid.    Area  n  Kenneth 
Edwards,  Glendive,  Harold  Jensen,  Baker.    Area 
in  Wayne  Proff,  Dutton,  Jack  Tweedy,  Cut  Bank. 
Area  IV  Elmer  Eklund,  Baker,  Jerry  Kolar, 
Stanford,    Area  V  Carl  Johnson,  Livingston,  Leslie 
Criswell,  Hysham.    Area  VI  Bill  Kessler,  Kalispell, 
Ralph  Tower,  Poison.    Area  vn  Pete  Jackson, 
Norris,  Frank  Thompson,  Wolf  Creek. 

The  State  Soil  Conservation  Committee  will  also 
be  meeting  with  the  directors.    Committee 
members  are  Fred  Sanborn,  Great  Falls,  John 
Schroeder,  Lolo,  Bill  D'Ewart,  Wilsall,  Carl 
Hunter,  Fairview,  Rorlief  Aasheim,  Bozeman, 
Joe  Asleson,  Bozeman,  C.  Lowell  Purdy,  Helena, 
Herschell  Hurd,  Bozeman. 

AFFILIATE  MEMBERSHIPS  RAISE  MONEY  FOR 
DISTRICTS 

Flathead  and  Judith  Basin  Districts  have  recently 
sold  a  number  of  affiliate  memberships  to  raise 
money  for  their  district  treasury. 

Montana  Association  SWCD  Policy  on  Affiliate 
Memberships  is: 

1.  That  all  funds  from  the  sale  of  Affiliate 
Memberships  remain  within  the  District. 

2.  When  Affiliate  Memberships  are  sold,  a 
thorough  explanation  of  a  Soil  and  Water  Conser- 
vation Districts  purpose  and  program  should  be 
given  to  the  prospective  affiliate  member,  (a  copy 
of  the  districts  Long  Range  Program  and  a  copy  of 
the  districts  Annual  Work  Plan). 

3.  That  the  Budget  &  Finance  Committee  of  the 
State  Association  sell  memberships  to  large 
companies  operating  within  the  state  for  a  fee  of 
$5.00. 

Districts  may  obtain  certificates  to  issue  by 
writing  to  the  Secretary  of  the  State  Soil  Conserva- 
tion Committee,  School  of  Mines,  Butte. 


Consider 


'<s  VA 


Zhe  Stteamqf  Cife 


SOIL  STEWARDSHIP  WEEK 
1962 


Zhe  earth  is  the  Cord's 


It  is  the  universal  liquid  of  life  and  part  of 
our  very  being.     It  is  everywhere  around  us, 
in  the  air  and  earth.     Without  it  we  could 
not  survive,  nor  could  any  plant,   animal,  or 
other  living  thing. 

It  is  a  final  necessity,  for  which  man  has 
devised  no  substitute. 

Water  can  be  so  abundant  as  to  invite  waste 
and  neglect.     It  can  be  so  scarce  as  to  set 
man  in  earnest  contest  for  its  vital  uses. 

It  demands  understanding  and  respect. 
It  has  the  power  under  direction  to  turn  the 
mighty  turbines  of  Grand  Coulee. 
Unmanaged,   it  can  strike  in  the  angry  form 
and  force  of  floods. 

It  can  produce  crops,  trees,  and  grass- 
or  the  ugliness  of  raw  gullies  cut  into  an 
unprotected  countryside. 

Water  provides  the  drama  of  Old  Faithful, 
the  majesty  of  the  Mississippi,  and  the 
grandeur  of  Niagara  Falls.     In  its  infinite 
variety  it  is  a  thirst -quenching  drink  for  the 
children  of  Atlanta,  a  cooling  accessory  for 
the  steel  mills  of  Ohio,  and  vital  irrigation 
for  the  sunward  fields  of  Arizona. 

It  appears  as  soaking  rain  on  Olympia's 
forests,  the  fleecy  hush  of  a  Vermont  snowfall 
and  the  quick  excitement  of  a  Kentucky 
thunderstorm. 

It  is  a  miraculous  gift  of  God,  given  to  us 
for  our  refreshment  and  endless  uses.     But 
our  neglect  can  waste  it;  our  misuse  can 
turn  it  into  offensive  sewers  of  pollution. 

Water  tests  our  sense  of  responsibility  to      I 
God  and  man.    It  asks  for  care,  requires  our 
self-discipline,  and  responds  to  management. 

This  priceless  water  has  been  here  before 
and  by  God's  plan  will  be  returned  again  and 
again  for  us  to  use  according  to  our  maturity 
either  with  wisdom  or  with  shameful  neglect 

Consider  our  water.    Consider  it  well. 


ilen&i  youst  cqyctf: 


■1BS?\ 


Library  tSU 
Missoula  t!ont 


BULK  RATE 
U  S  Postage 
PAID 
Permit  #171 
Butte,  Montana 


33}.?^    - 


reasure 


SMTLL-       ENTS 


ere 


SOIL   *   WATEf 
^CONSERVATION/ 


O.  M.Ueland,  Editor,  School  of  Mines,  Butte,  Montana 


OFFICIAL     NEWS    BULLETIN 


JULY  1962 


©  *g  StA»* 


Pictured  above  clockwise   are  Leslie  Criswell,  Dick  Setterstrom,  Joe  Asleson, 
Morris  Billehus,  Oscar  Hippe,  Fred  Sanborn,  Herschell  Hurd,  Mrs.  Leslie  Criswell, 
Henry  Evans,  Frank  Thompson,  John  Schroeder,  Pete  Jackson,  Kenneth  Edwards, 
O.  M.  Ueland,  To  the  right  are  Ed  Morgan,  and  Carl  Hunter 


YOUR  ASSOCIATION  PRESIDENT  SEZ: 

At  the  Area  V  meeting  in  Bismarck, 
North  Dakota  there  was  some  good  dis- 
cussion on  District  operations  and 
Public  Relations,  as  well  as  many 
other  subjects.    It  is  apparent  that 
Supervisors  are  lax  in  some  of  their 
duties  relative  to  these  subjects. 

Committee  responsibilities  and  organi- 
zation of  Boards  for  individual  respon- 
sibilities has  been  mentioned  before. 

A  Work  Plan,  or  program  of  planned 
activities  for  a  district  is  one  of  the 
first  steps  a  Board  of  Supervisors  must 
take  at  the  start  of  the  year.   A  well -thought 
out  program  of  the  year's  activities 
should  be  a  written  document  and  for 
good  Public  Relations  and  Publicity,  it 
should  be  published  in  the  local  news- 
paper so  that  the  general  public  can 
know  and  appreciate  what  the  District  is 

doing.  Continued  on  Page    5 


Directors  of  MASWCD  Meet  in  Lewistown 

Directors  of  Montana  Association  met  in 
Lewistown  June  23  for  their  midsummer 
meeting  along  with  members  of  the  Montana 
State  Soil  Conservation  Committee. 

President  Leslie  Criswell  reported  of  his 
attendance  at  NACD  meeting  in  Philadelphia 
and  his  meetings  with  Congressman  Battin 
and  Olsen  and  Senator  Metcalf  in  Washing- 
ton D.  C.  also  of  the  Area  V  meeting  in 
Bismarck.    Data  submitted  by  Criswell  in 
regards  to  Conservation  Needs  in  Montana 
went  into  the  Congressional  record. 
Criswell  stated  that  the  most  important 
problems  facing  supervisors  are  need  for 
good  public  Realtions  and  Finances,  es- 
pecially need  for  clerical  help  to  release 
technicians  for  field  work. 

National  Director  Oscar  Hippe  reported  on 
his  meetings  in  Washington  D.  C.  and 
meetings  with  various  congressional  com- 
mittees, and  getting  appropriations  for 

Continued  on  Page    2 


various  Conservation  Programs. 

State  Conservationist  Herschell  Hurd 
reported  that  technical  help  for  Great 
Plains  contracts  are  paid  for  out  of 
regular  funds,  and  consequently  this 
reduces  SCS  assistance  to  districts. 

Directors  reported  on  problems  in  their 
areas  which  included  shortage  of  techni- 
cal help,  ACP  funds  running  out,  Missile 
Cable  Line  reseeding  and  need  for  amend 
ing  state  law  to  include  reseeding  of  all 
surface  disturbance  on  any  kind  of  right 
of  way;  waste  of  time  the  farmer  and 
agencies  have  in  connection  with  gaining 
rights-of-ways,  water  rights,  financial 
assistance  to  districts,  weed  problems. 

Committee  reports  were  as  follows: 

Education  -  Efforts  should  be  made  to 
get  money  to  reactivate  position  of  Con- 
servation coordinator  in  State  Depart- 
ment of  Public  Instruction,  and  for 
Range  Management  and  other  Conser- 
vation Specialists  on  the  Extension  staff. 

Twelve  districts  have  applications  for 
nineteen  teachers  for  Conservation  Work- 
shops.   In  1961  fourteen  districts  offered 
scholarships  but  had  no  takers. 

Montana  might  ask  County  Superintendent 
of  Schools  to  include  a  Conservation 
Seminar  in  alternate  years  in  their 
yearly  meetings  with  teachers. 


Budget  &  Finance  -  Sixteen  districts 
haven't  paid  their  1962  dues.    Executive 
Secretary  was  asked  to  visit  delinquent 
districts  to  see  if  they  wanted  a  district! 

Maybe  they  could  be  consolidated  or  ab- 
andoned.   Montana  is  one  of  fourteen 
states  in  U.S.  without  appropriation  for 
aid  to  districts.    The  directors  passed  a 
resolution  for  a  request  of  the  State  Com- 
mtttee  for  a  supplemental  budget  of  $24,000 
for  aid  to  districts  for  the  next  bienneum, 
with  the  provision  this  money  be  distributed 
75%  according  to  need  and  25%  according  to 
number  of  operators. 

Public  Lands  -  The  NACD  Public  Lands 
Survey  was  discussed  and  the  directors 
moved  that  O.  M.  Ueland  represent  the 
state  association  at  the  NACD  Public 
Lands  Committee  meeting  in  Flagstaff, 
Arizona,  August  2-3,    Considerable 


I  f  you 
don*  t 


crops 

flopping. 

then 


practice 

stripp 
cropping 

-Patty 
Wai  t  e . 
Liberty 
County. 


concern  was  voiced  over  conservation 
practices  on  State  lands,  and  agreement 
seemed  to  be  that  it  would  be  desirable 
if  the  state  could  get  away  from  a  bid 
basis  in  leasing  so  far  as  conservation  is 
concerned. 

Great  Plains  -  440  contracts  in  Montana, 
$1, 055, 199  has  been  paid  out  in  cost 
Sharing.    It  was  recommended  that  policy 
on  Great  Plains  be  formulated  by  Great 
Plains  states  for  councilmen. 

Program  &  Research  -  NACD  for  first 
time  is  getting  a  hearing  with  the  Bureau 
of  Budget,  Annual  report  should  be  dessi- 
minated  by  all  means.    Suggest  that  one 
row  shelterbelt  tree  planting  should  be 
stepped  up.    Montana  is  ahead  of  other  . 
states  in  strip  cropping  and  stubble  mulch 
tillage. 

Legislative  Committee  report  -  1.    By- 
laws of  association  need  amending  to 
identify  standing  committees  and  duties 
and  responsibilities  of  same.    2.    Report 
at  convention  on  desirability  of  means  of 
electing  a  councilman.    3.    Legislators 

should  be  informed  of  Conservation  legis- 
lation before  they  go  to  Helena,  districts 
should  confer  with  them  beforehand. 
Directors  should  engage  legislators  to 
speak  at  their  Area  meetings  on  approp- 
riate topics. 

Area  Meeting  dates  were  set  as  follows: 


Area  I    October  2 


Area  V  October  4 


Area  n    October  3        Area  VI  October  9 
Area  HI  October  10      Area  VII  October  11 

Area  IV    October  5 

President  Criswell  gave  a  summary  of 
the  coming  annual  meeting  which  will  be 
at  Livingston  Nov.  15  -  16.   The  theme 
of  the  convention  will  be  "Conservation 
Builds  Recreation".    The  Park  County 
SWCD   is  working  hard  to  make  your 
visit  in  Livingston  an  enjoyable  one. 


Nothing  is  easier  than  fault- 
finding; 

no  talent,  no  self-denial,  no  brains 

no  character  are   required  to  set 
up  in 

the  grumbling  business. 

—  ROBERT  WEST 


Range  Management  Society  Meetings    - 
The  Inter  mountain  Section  and  Northern 
Great  Plains  Section  of  the  American 
Society  of  Range  Management  held  meetings 
in  June  and  July  at  Havre.    Many  ranchers 
supervisors,  county  agents,  and  techni- 
cians, attended,  and  learned  many  inter- 
esting range  management  facts.    Of 
Special  interest  was  a  tour  of  and  pictures 
of  work  being  done  at  the  Northern 
Montana  Branch  Station,    Research  there 
shows  promise  of  many  ways  of  growing 
grass  and  of  new  grasses. 

This  American  Society  of  Range  Manage- 
ment prints  a  monthly,  "Journal  of 
Range  Management,""   which  has  the 
best  obtainable  information  on  Range 
Management.    Ranchers  and  especially 
supervisors  should  subscribe  and  read 
this  valuable  publication.    Dues  & 
Subscription  are  $8 .  00.    Mail  to  Executive 
Secretary,  P.  O.  Box  5041,  Portland  13, 
Oregon. 


Each  is  given  a  bag  of  tools, 

A  shapeless  mass, 

A  book  of  rules; 

And  each   must  make. 

Ere   life  is  flown, 

A  stumbling  block 

Or  a  stepping  stone. 

—  «.  t.  SHARPE 

DISTRICT  DOINGS 


Area  Supervisors,  technicians  and  County 
Agents  toured  the  Plant  Materials  Center 
at  Bridger  July  18.    Here  many  grasses 
are  being  grown  and  seed  harvested  for 
use  as  basic  atuCK 

Three  Rivers  District  employ  their  local 
newpaper  editor  as  their  secretary  .    He 
is  Lyle  K.  Williams,  publisher  of  the 
Three  Forks  Herald. 

Jefferson  County  SWCD  provides    agree- 
ment forms  for  contractor  s    and  coopera- 
tors  to  negotiate  before  any  work  is  done 
and  thus  avoid  many  misunderstandings. 

Supervisor  Dale  Re  id  of  Ruby  Valley 
District  believes  cooperators  in  his 
district  are  improving  their  ranges 
considerably  and  taking  range  manage- 
ment seriously. 


Go  to 
your 
Conser- 
vation 

meetings. 

or   your 
crops   will 

take   a 
beating 

-    Janet 
Good 

Chester, 

Mon  tana 


Chairman  Gene  Hanson  of  the  Jefferson 
Vallen  district  reports  much  interest  in 
a  proposed  drainage  project  near  White- 
haU.    Application  has  been  made  for  this 
as  a  Watershed  project.    Thirty  farmers 
with  6,000  acres  will  benefit. 

John  Buttleman,  Chairman  of  the  Three 
Rivers  District  and  former  chairman  of 
Montana  State  Soil  Conservation  Committee 
believes  in   starting  meetings  on  time. 
He  uses  the  count  down  system.    Of  course 
he  has  all  his  supervisors  there  waiting 
to  go. 

Chairman   Jeffers  of  Madison  district 
reports  a  lack  of  finances  in  his  district. 
He  states  they  raised  a  couple  of  hundred 
dollars  last  year  by  contributions  from 
cooperators  but  is  not  so  sure  it  will  go 
every  year.    (Ed.  Note.    Conservation 
pays.    Don't  be  afraid  to  ask.    You  won't 
get  much  if  you  don't'.) 

County  Agent  Lee  Rovig  of  Liberty  County 
SWCD  arranged  a  range  tour  near  Tiber 
Reservoir.    The  tour  included  a  visit  to 
nearby  range  areas  to  see  first  hand  some 
examples  of  range  condition  and  use  ,  and 
talks  on  Plant  Identification  by  Fred 
Blaisdell,  WUC;  SCDSCS  Planning  Assistance 
by  Fred,  Grazing  Response  -  Root  Growth 
by  James  Newman  of  SCS,  Range  Condition 
by  Joe  Zacex,  SCS  Range  Management 
Specialist,  and  Economics  of  Range  Manage- 
ment by  Lee. 

Many  districts  have  held  range  tours.    Whether 
only  a  few  or  many  attend,  they  are  very  well 
worthwhile.    This  has  been  a  good  year  for 
growing  grass  and  many  interesting  observa- 
tions can  be  made  on  what  grows  on  ranges 
that  have  been  misused  and  those  that  haven't. 
All  districts  should  arrange  several  meetings 
a  year  to  bring  benefits  of  good  range  use  to 
attention  of  ranchers  and  public. 

Chairman  Sam  Kovando  of  Stillwater  District 
and  WUC  Vern  Sundberg  report  serious  Leafy 
Spurge  weed  infestation  in  their  district.    The 
extremely  high  cost  of  control  has  prohibited 
doing  much  with  it.    Do  any  other  districts 
have  any  suggestions? 

Sam  was  also  concerned  about  the  new  Basic 
Memorandum  of  Understanding  with  USDA 
which  districts  are  requested  to  negotiate, 
relative  to  the  provision  that  districts  make  no 
charges  for  any  assistance  provided  by  USDA. 
This  has  always  been  so.     Districts  can  charge 
for  services  they  perform,  such  as  collecting, 
providing  materials,  etc.,  so  long  as  Federal 


REPORT  ON  STATE  SOIL  CONSERVATION 
COMMIT EE  MEETING 

The  State  Soil  Conservation  Committee 
met  in  Lewistown  June  22  -  23.    The 
Basic  Memorandum  of  Understanding 
Agreement  form  was  approved  for  use 
by  districts  in  requesting  assistance  from 
United  States  Department  of  Agriculture. 
These  forms  will  be  distributed  by  the 
Executive  Secretary  as  soon  as  a  supply 
is  printed.    The  Committee  urges  dis- 
tricts to  enter  into  this  new  agreement 
which  offers  assistance  in  other  Conser- 
vation activities  such  as  water,  recreation, 
watershed,  wildlife,  etc.,  as  well  as 
soil.    Districts  will  be  expected  to  raise 
and  update  their  long  term  Conservation 
Program.    A  strong  desire  was  voiced 
for  the  need  for  a  Supplemental  Memor- 
andum of  Understanding  between  districts 
and  ASCS  to  better  clarify  each  others 
responsibilities  and  assistance  to  one 
another  in  the  Conservation  field.    Ex- 
ecutive Secretary  was  directed  to  work 
on  this- 

State  Lands  -  It  was  suggested  supervisors 
can  and  should  accept  more  responsibility 
in  promoting  Conservation  on  these  lands 
and  to  help  the  State  Land  Board  in  prob- 
lems they  have  in  this  connection.    It  was 
suggested  that  Mons  Teigen,  Commissioner 
of  State  Lands,  meet  with  the  board  regu- 
larly with  the  view  of  coordinating  efforts. 
State  Law  is  broad  in  its  statement  that 
districts  promote  and  coordinate  Soil 
&  Water  Conservation  on  all  lands  within 
their  boundaries. 

Roadside  Seeding:  Joe  Asleson  explained 
that  the  Highway  Department  have  asked 
for  specifications  on  grass  seeding.  He 
also  stated  that  the  Highway  Department 
is  authorized  by  law  to  spend  5%  of  their 
funds  for  research.  Negotiations  are  in 
process  now  to  get  researcn  m  now  to 

seed  roadsides.    Montana  has  varied  con- 
ditions.   The  Committee  asked  the  Secre- 
tary to  follow  up  on  this,  encourage 
experiment  station  to  study,  encourage 
supervisors  to  talk  with  County  Commiss- 
ioners.   The  opportunity  to  harvest  hay 
from  roadsides  should  be  explored.    The 
Highway  Department  reports  no  contracts 
have  been  let  this  year  for  seeding  sec- 
ondary roads  pending  agreements  with 
County  Commissioners.    Contracts  for 
seeding  Primary  Roads  are  quite  involved 
Big  Sandy  and  Choteau  Districts  would 
like  to  get  roadside  seeding  contracts. 
Federal  funds  cannot  be  used  by  local 
governments  for  work  they  do  themselves 
must  be  contracted  to  private  enterprise. 


Soil 
is 
gone 
but 
taxes 

go 
on  - 

Keith 
Duncan 

Joplin. 
Montana 


Range  Management  problems  and  ways  of 
getting  to  ranchers  with  information  was 
discussed. .    Joe  Asleson  stated  bulletins 
were  actually  very  ineffective.    Pete 
Jackson  stated  that  meeting  with  ranchers 
in  cost  return  meetings  and  the  setting  up 
of  certain  ranchers  (with  their  permission) 
as  examples,  was  probably  the  best  way  to 
get  improvements  in  range  management. 
The  work  of  Bob  Ross,  SCS;  Carl  Parker 
of  Extension,  and  others  were  cited  as 
good  examples  of  interesting  ranchers  in 
better  Range  Management  and  should  be 
expanded 

Tree  Planting  Program    -   Use  of  Field 
Windbreaks  are  still  controversial  in 
Montana  but  much  promise  is  being  shown 
with  single  row  plantings.    Districts  should 
be  encouraged  to  take  on  tree  planting  pro- 
jects. 

Gas  &  Oil  Commission    -   Carl  Hunter  stated 
that  an  investigation  has  to  be  done,  some 
action  should  be  taken,  in  which  the  Gas  & 
Oil  Commission  is  allowing  flooding  of 
oil  wells  to  deplete  fresh  water  supplies 
and  contaminate  others.    It  was  suggested 
the  Association  bring  pressure  on  legisla- 
tors to  get  funds   for  State  Engineer  to  ad- 
minster  Underground  Water  Code  to 
suggest  this  to  MASWCD  directors.    This 
would  help  get  investigation. 

Change  of  Name  approved    -    Reserve  Soil 
and  Water  Conservation  District  application 
was  approved  to  change  their  name  to 
Sheridan  County  Soil  and  Water  Conserva- 
tion District.    All  districts  have  made 
application  to  change  their  name  to  include 
"Water". 

State  Committee  Budget    -   At  the  request 
of  directors  of  Montana  Association  SWCD, 
the  committee  agreed  to  submit  a  supple- 
mental budget  for  Aid  to  Districts,     This 
money  if  appropriated  is  to  be  used  for 
Administrative  expenses  of  districts,  25% 
such  seems  to  be  distributed  to  each  dis- 
trict on  a  basis  of  number  of  operator s» 
and  75%  of  such  seems  on  a  basis  of  needs 
as  determined  by  the  State  Committee. 

Watershed  Applications  were  received  and 
approved  for  the  following:    Shotgun  Water- 
shed in   Roosevelt  County  which  involves 
90  operators  and  250,000  acres.    Whitehall 
Watershed  which  is  primarily  a  6,  000  acre 
drainage  project  and  involves  30  farmers. 
An  application  for  Crooked  Creek  in  Carbon 

County  and  Wyoming  was  referred  to 
Wyoming  authorities. 


II 


employees  services  are  not  directly  involved. 
Districts  can  ask  for  and  accept  contributions 
so  long  as  it  is  understood  it  is  for  district 
operations    and  not  for  federal  government 
operations 


a 

r 
- 


Shown  above  is  a  single  row  field  windbreak 
on  the  John  Byrne  farm  south  of  Laurel  in 
Yellowstone  County.    These  plantings  are  one 
year  old,  as  tall  as  the  wheat,  and  in  excellent 
condition.    The  outstanding  feature  of  this 
man's  operation  is  that  he  controls  the  weeds 
)  about  the  trees  with  chemicals.    It  has  been 
an  experiment  with  him,  and  where  he  found 
it  practically  impossible  to  keep  the  weeds 
down  by  clean  cultivation  ,    this  particular 
chemical  he  uses  does  no  apparent  harm  to 
the  45  miles  of  windbreak  he  has  treated. 

Byrnes  has  a  Great  Plains  Contract  and  is  to 
be  congratulated  on  the  fine  job  he  is  doing. 
Supervisors  of  Area  V  recently  had  the  plea- 
sure of  touring  his  place.    Incidentally,  he  is 
a  believer  in  the  take  half,  leave  half  of  the 
grass  on  his  ranges  and  they  show  it. 

(Continued  from  Page  1,  Your   Assoc. 
President  Sez) 

The  Guide  Books  printed  by  NACD  can  be  of 
great  help  in  arranging  the  program,  with 
various  jobs  assigned  to  individual  super- 
visors.   Then  every  super-'isor  has  his 
work  and  he  knows  to  whom  he  can  look 
for  various  phases  of  the  program.    This 
can  work  and  it  will  shorten  the  length 
of  the  meetings  of  the  Boards  and  facilitate 
District  work.      The  value  of  organization 
is  sometimes  amazing. 


DIRECTORY  OF  MONTANA  SUPERVISORS 
AVAILABLE 

A  directory  listing  all  the  supervisors  in  the 
59  Soil  and  Water  Conservation  Districts  in 
Montana  is  available  form  the  Montana  Soil 
Conservation  Committee  office  at  the  School 
of  Mines  in  Butte.    If  you  have  not  received 
a  copy  and  desire  one,  send  us  your  request. 

GRASS  ROOTS  SURVEY  COMPLETED  BY 
TREASURE  AND  WD3AUX  DISTRICTS. 

Treasure  and  Wibaux  SWCD's   have  completed 
and  mailed  in  their  NACD  Public  Lands  Grass 
Roots  Survey.    Many  districts  are  struggling 
with  it.    It  is  particularly  important  that 
Public   Lands  agencies  get  the  form  early 
so  they  can  be  working  on  them. 

Arnold  Bolle  New  Dean  of  Forextry  at  MSU 

Congratulations  to  Arnold  Bolle  who  has  been 
appointed  Dean  of  Montana  State  University 
School  of  Forestry.    Arnold  at  one  time  was 
employed  by  Soil  Conservation  Service  before 
taking  a  teaching  assignment  at  MSU.    He  is 
presently  President  of  Montana  Conservation 
Council  and  Montana  Woodland  Council.    Dean 
Bolle  replaces  Ross  Williams  who  has  re- 
tired. 

Persons  building  Irrigation  Storage  Dams 
above  Canyon  Ferry  must  obtain  Bureau  of 
Reclamation  approval. 

Inquiry  has  been  made  relative  to  building 
of  dams  above  Canyon  Ferry.    Inasmuch   as 
the  Bureau  of  Reclamation  claims  unappro- 
priated rights  as  of  the  time  of  the  begin- 
ning of  operation  of  Canyon  Ferry  dam, 
clearance  must  be  made  with  them  on  any 
projects  being  developed  above  Canyon 
Ferry.    Four  private  and  two  watershed 
projects  have    since  been  approved,  but 
the  parties  concerned  have  to  pay  14.3  $ 
per  acre  for  the  water  for  forty  years, 
and  5£  maintenance,  and  abide  by  the 
160  acre  limitation. 


STATISTICALLY   ON   THt  BALL 

One  hundred  men  and  two  women  cooks  were  employed 
at  a  lumber  camp.  The  owner,  a  stickler  for  business-like 
procedures,  penned  a  memo  to  his  foreman:  "Make  your 
reports  brief  and  snappy.  Don't  waste  words.  Give  precise 
figures." 

The  foreman's  next  monthly  report  read:  "Last  month 
2$  of  the  men  married  100%  of  the  women  employees." 


*  *  * 


FOUR  FUNDAMENTAL  REQUIREMENTS  IN  WORKING  TOGETHER  IN  SOIL 

CONSERVATION  DISTRICTS    -  Courtesy  Arizona  Association  SCD 

1.  Recognize  the  Responsibilities  of  Others  -  Mutual  understanding  and  respect  for  the 
responsibilities,  plans  and  activities  of  all  organizations  cooperating  with  District. 

2.  Know  the  Total  Conservation  Job  -  Cooperative  determination  of  the  total  conservation 
job  in  the  District  and  cooperative  development  of  an  annual  plan  of  action. 

3.  Appraise  the  Resources  Needed  -  Make  a  cooperative  annual  appraisal  of  the  personnel, 
equipment,  material  and  other  resources  needed  for  satisfactory  progress  in  the  District 
for  the  year  ahead  and  in  accordance  with  the  long-range  program  of  the  District. 

4.  Report  on  Objectives,  Problems  and  Progress  -  Cooperation  in  making  it  known  to 
District  Cooperators,  other  farms  and  ranchers  and  the  District  Community  in  general, 
factual  information  about  the  problems,  progress  and  objectives  of  the  District, 

SO  MUCH  WITH  "SO  LITTLE" 

It  is  difficult  for  many  people  to  understand  how  Soil  Conversation  Districts  can  be  so  effective 
in  their  work,  when  they  are  managed  by  non-  salaried  local  people  who  have  no  power  to  levy 
taxes,  issue  bonds  or  compel  anyone  in  the  District  to  do  anything  for  conservation  problems 
oi  the  soil  or  water  resources  of  the  area. 

The  Soil  Conservation  Districts  provide  a  way  for  individuals  and  groups  of  landowners  or 
operators  to  band  together  to  cope  with  their  mutual  soil  and  water  conservation  problems 
within  a  given  area.    Usually,  this  is  something  they  cannot  do  effectively  as  individuals,  for 
their  resources  as  individuals  are  limited  in  this  field.    It  is  another  application  of  the  age- 
old  idea  that  united  we  stand,  divided  we  fall — applied  in  the  Soil  Conservation  Districts  to  the 
significant  problem  of  saving  and  developing  our  key  resources  of  soil  and  water  for  this  and 
the  future  generations  of  Americans. 

Various  agencies  of  the  state  and  federal  governments  have  an  important  part  in  making  these 
conservation  Districts  successful,  for  they  give  these  Districts  invaluable  technical  assistance 
research  information,  educational  aid  and  ease  the  load  of  conservation  with  cost -sharing  'agree- 
ments for  worthwhile  and  needed  conservation  practices  and  projects. 

Working   with  District  Cooperators  and  state  and  federal  agencies,  numerous  business  firms  with 
direct  interest  in  the  welfare  of  farming  and  ranching,  the  press,  radio-television,  schools  and 
churches  make  very  significant  contributions  to  the  conservation  programs  through  the  Districts. 

Underlying  all  this  is  the  fact  that  the  Soil  Conservation  Districts  are  based  on  the  democratic 
belief  that  local  people  know  their  local  problems  best  and  can  cope  successfully  with  those 
soil  and  water  conservation  problems,  if  they  have  the  encouragement    cooperation  and 
assistance    of  those  in  position  to  assist.    Putting  this  idea  into  practice  is  the  secret  of  how 
such  Districts  can  be  so  effective  and  do  so  much  with  "so  little". 


BULK  RATE 
U  S  Postage 

Library  L!SU  PAID 

Permit  #171 

ssoula  i."ont  Butte,  Montana 


V^-t^ 


S 
353-72 


reasure 


ere 


Leslie  Criswell 
YOUR  ASSOCIATION  PRESIDENT  SEZ: 

The  dates  for  the  seven  Area  Meetings  in 
Montana  have  been  set  for  early  in  October. 
These  are  important  meetings  for  District 
Supervisors  because  here  is  layed  the  ground- 
work for  the  State  Association,  both  in  prin- 
ciple and  action. 

This  years  State  Convention  will  set  up  our 
policies,  and  will  to  a  great  extent  determine 
the  future  course  of  our  State  Association. 
Are  we,  as  District  Supervisors,  willing  to 
accept  additional  responsibilities  and  duties 
so  as  to  keep  abreast  of  current  happenings 
and  keep  up  with  other  Districts  ?     Our  action 
at  the  Area  meetings  and  the  State  Convention 
will  give  the  answer. 

)  will  accelerate  action  at  the  convention  if  we 
can  have  the  resolutions  come  from  the  Area 
meetings.     They  afford  a  golden  opportunity 
for  your  deliberations,      fiend  your  resolutions 
to  me  for  screening  soon  after  the  Area  meetings. 
I  would  like  to  have  them  by  November  1. 


STATE  SOIL  CONSERVATION  COMMITTEE 
MEETING  to  be  SEPTEMBER  13  &  14 

The  next  meeting  of  the  State  Soil  Conservation 
Committee  will  be  September  13  &  14  at  the 
State  Water  Conservation  Board  office  in  Helena. 

Some  items  on  the  Agenda  are:    Conservation  on 
State  Lands  with  Mons  Teigen,  Commissioner  of 
State  Lands,  reporting;  Conservation  Education 
in  Montana's  schools  with  Harriet  Miller,  State 
Superintendent  of  Public  Instruction,  reporting; 
a  discussion  and  review  of  the  use  of  Underground 
Water  to  flush  oil  wells  as  a  concern  of  the  Little 
Beaver  Soil  &  Water  Conservation  District;  a 
review  of  P.L.  566  Watershed  Projects;  and  a 
report  of  Soil  &  Water  Conservation  District 
Activities. 

The  Executive  Secretary  has  noticed  a  lessoning 
of  activity  by  district  supervisors  during  the 
summer  months,  some  districts  having  missed 
a  meeting  or  two,  and  many  supervisors  being 
absent  from  meetings  that  were  held.    This  calls 
for  better  planning  of  our  TIME. 


A   woman's  work  is  never  done,  especially   if  she 
depends  upon  her  husband  or  daughter  to  do  it. 


Probably  the  most  important  thing  you  can  do  in 
your  Area  meetings  is  to  1  ominate  your  State 
Association  Directors.   Think  about  it  and  discuss 
the  prospects  with  other  Supervisors.    We  need 
men  who  will  act,  and  not  be  a  Director  in  name 
only.    The  Board  of  Directors,  only  14  men  in 
all,  elects  the  State  Association  President  ttfld 
Vice-President.    Talk  it  up  and  then  make  your 
Director  selection  wisely.  There  are  many  good 
prospects  among  the  Supervisors  in  your  Area 
— choose  them  and  then  support  them  while  they 
represent  you  in  office. 

— Leslie  Criswell 


Report  on 

NACD  PUBLIC  LANDS  COMMITTEE  MEETING 

The  NACD  Public  Lands  Committee  met  at 
Flagstaff,  Arizona,  August  2  &  3. 

Progress  on  the  current  Grass-Roots  survey 
for  an  Inventory  of  Resource  Conservation  and 
Development  Needs  within  Soil  and  Water  Con- 
servation Districts  in  the  eleven  western  Public 
Lands  States  shows  a  beginning  in  all  states, 
and  it  is  anticipated  it  will  be  completed  this 
fall  and  winter.   No  big  problems  were  presented 
all  agencies  are  cooperating.    The  survey  isn't 
as  big  a  job  as  it  seems  says  Bob  McClelland, 
Western  Area  Program  Officer. 

Some  use  of  this  survey  material  will  be: 

1.  Basis  of  program  of  work  in  districts. 

2.  Use  with  County  Commissioners,  Chambers 
of  Commerce,  Planning  Boards,  etc. 

3.  Needs  to  be  publicity  on  these  figures  to  get 
public  acquainted  with  resource  needs. 

4.  Use  for  districts  to  update  their  long  range 
program  in  line  with  USDA  and  USDI  Memoran- 
dums of  Understanding. 

5.  Tie  these  figures  closely  to  farm  or  ranch 
plans. 

6.  There  is  need  for  lots  of  technical  advice 
from  technicians.    Supervisors  handle  people. 
All  three  groups,  agencies,  people  served, 
supervisors,  must  be  kept  together  and  made  a 
part  of  any  long-range  program.    Not  just  a 
district  program,  but  each  agency's  as  well. 

Gordon  Zimmerman,  NACD  Executive  Secretary, 
pointed  out  the  following  End  Uses  of  this  Inven- 
tory for  use  by  district  boards: 

1.  Supervisors  are  local  government  whose 
basic  job  is  to  learn  and  plan. 

2.  Reappraisal  (men  of  vision  who  guess  right) 

3.  Redraft  a  new  good  useful  program. 

4.  Work  on  public  lands  go  together  with  private 
lands. 

5.  Each  agency  is  responsible  for  developing 
their  own  plans.    We  have  asked  agencies  to 
help  us,  we  must  help  them. 

Jones,  beset  by  stress  ond  strife, 

Begged   this  single  boon   of  life: 
"Give  me  hqlf  a  chance!"  Know  what? 

Half  a  chance  was  all  he  got! 

—  ANITA   RASKIN 


6.    Private  and  public  programs  can't  progress 
without  technical  help.    Lots  of  money  is  requested 
of  Congress  to  carry  out  programs.    This  inven- 
tory puts  supervisors  in  an  intelligent  position  to 
know,  so  they  aren't  a  front  man,  a  yes  man,  or    g 
a  man  who  doesn't  know'. 

This  survey  can  be  used  for  forming  an  Overall 
Economic  Development  Plan.    Increased  grazing? 
Increased  Recreation?  etc.  ? 

Assistant  Secretary  of  the  Interior  Carver  told  of 
two  loanguages  being  spoken,  those  of  diverse 
interests,;  and  those  with  common  interests.    He 
stated  our  chief  concern  is  with  leaving  the  land 
better  than  we  found  it.    Secretary  Carver  had 
high  praise  for  the  work  of  districts  and  the  pos- 
sibility of  cooperating  in  planning  and  -carrying 
out  those  plans. 

Mr.  Beatty  of  the  Forest  Service  told  the  group 
that  this  Inventory  is  step  One. 
Developing  of  the  programs  is  step  Two. 


Time  was  is  past  —  thou  canst  it  not  recall. 
Time  is  thou  hast  —  employ  thy  portion  small. 
Time  future  is  not,  and  may  never  be. 
Time  present  is  the  only  time  for  thee! 

— Inscription  on  an  ancient  sun  dial. 


District  Programs 
Agency  programs 
Memorandums  of  understanding  is  step  Three. 
Joint  Meetings    -   Public  Agencies  must 
work  with  all  interest  groups. 

The  Public  Lands  Committee  made  the  following 
recommendations : 

1.  That  each  of  the  eleven  western  states  review 
activities  each  year  of  all  agencies,  state  com- 
mittees take  lead. 

2.  Review  the  Brownfield-Lee  proposal  that  ad- 
d'£g->nal  fees  comtemplated  being  charged  by  BLM 
ts  used  for  Conservation  purposes. 

3.  That  ACP  funds  be  allowed  to  build  practices  on 
federal  land  which  would  benefit  private  lands. 

*************** 


Supervisors  are  reminded  to  consider  the  progress 
of  the  NACD  Public  Lands  Grass-Rppts  Survey  at 
each  of  their  meetings  now  and  until  completion. 
Remember  all  lands,  public  and  private,  will  need  ' 
to  have  a  Form  2  filled  out  with  the  cooperation  of 
each  agency  having  responsibility  for  Conservation. 
Review  your  instructions . 


H.D.  HURD,  STATE  CONSERVATIONIST,  SPEAKS 

At  the  last  annual  meeting  of  the  MASWCD  a  panel 
it    discussed  the  subject,  "Are  Federal  Aids  Necessary 
l| '  to  Soil  and  Water  Conservation?"    Many  challenges 
to  SWCDs,  SCS  and  others  were  presented  by  panel 
members.    Panel  member  comments  were  thought- 
provoking.    It  was  a  good  panel. 

This  panel  caused  me  to  do  some  thinking.    One 
panelist  questioned  the  efficiency  of  SCS.    It  was 
indicated  that  low  producing  employees  cannot  be 
dismissed. 

SCS  is  continually  concerned  about  efficient  opera- 
tions.   We  have  a  regular  program  to  locate  low 
producing  work  units  and  individuals.    Goals  are 
established  each  year  for  each  work  until  staff. 
When  accomplishment  of  goals  falls  substantially 
short  of  goals,  the  reasons  are  determined  and 
action  is  taken.    If  the  reason  is  a  "lazy"  individual, 
he  is  given  a  period  of  time  to  get  his  production  of 
work  up  to  minimum  standards .    If  he  fails  to  do 
this  and  maintain  reasonable  accomplishment,  he 
is  dismissed.    Fifteen  SCS  employees  in  Montana 
have  been  dismissed,  or  resigned  to  avoid  dis- 
missal, in  the  last  five  years. 

Plans,  records  and  "paper  work"  of  SCS  people 
was  referred  to  during  the  panel  discussion.    We 

fe  have  no  "paper  work"  in  SCS  to  my  knowledge. 

™  We  do  write  plans,  keep  records,  make  reports, 
prepare  designs,  correspond,  etc.    Such  work  is 
done  in  the  office  and  all  of  it  serves  a  purpose  in 
getting  conservation  on  the  land. 

Last  winter  we  decided  to  increase  our  efforts  to 
find  out  all  of  the  jobs  SCS  people  do  which  may  not 
be  essential.    Coupled  with  this,   we  surveyed  all 
locations  in  the  state  to  get  time-saving  suggestions. 
We  informed  all  locations  that  nothing  was  "sacred". 
Policies,  procedures,  and  even  laws,  can  be  changed 

We  got  lots  of  ideas  from  field  people.    Many  of 
them  were  good.    It  resulted  in  cutting  out  sixteen 
things  we  had  been  doing  that  were  not  essential. 
True,  some  of  them  were  small,  but  a  lot  of  small 
items  add  up  tomanyman  hours  of  time  saved. 

Twenty-four  other  time  saving  devices  are  under 
study  and  no  doubt  many  of  them  will  be  put  into 
effect. 

Any  suggestions  that  anyone  has  for  improvement 
of  SCS  efficiency  are  solicited.    I  assure  you  that 
careful  consideration  will  be  given  to  such  sug- 
gestions .  —  h.  D.  Hurd 

,\  Doing  business  without  advertising  is  like  winking 

at  a  girl  in  the  dark.   You  know  what  you  are  doing, 
but  no  one  else  does. 

*  *  * 

A  young  couple  on  a  honeymoon  may  be  living  a 
life  of  "coo-existence." 


Phil  Van  Cleave,  SCS  Range  Conservationist, 
(white  shirt  pointing)  talks  "grass"  to  4-H  mem- 
bers and  leaders.    The  Little  Beaver  SWCD 
planned  and  staged  an  over-  night  range  tour  for 
the  4-H  boys  and  girls  in  Fallong  County  taking 
Range  Management. 

Leaving  by  horseback  and  riding  many  miles 
through  the  ranges,  then  staying  overnight  under 
the  stars  and  returning  home  the  next  afternoon 
proved  to  be  a  big  thrill  and  a  real  education  to 
these  young  people.    Many  stops  were  made  along 
the  way  to  learn  about  plants,  range  problems  and 
management.    Contests  were  held  to  determine 
who  could  gather  and  correctly  identify  the  largest 
number  of  grasses,  forbs,  and  shrubs  in  a  desig- 
nated time. 

Little  Beaver  supervisors  attending  and  assisting 
felt  well  rewarded  for  their  efforts.    They  feel 
that  Range  Management  is  the  most  important 
Conservation  objective  for  them  to  reach. 

At  the  overnight  stopping  place  a  potluck  supper 
and  program  was  held  with  many  parents  and 
other  townpeople  attending.    Van  Cleave  spoke 
on  the  "Economics  of  Range"  and  Bob  Brown, 
Fish  &  Game  Bioligist  spoke  on  the  "relationship* 
of  range  and  wildlife". 

This  was  the  first  time  this  type  of  tour  has  been 
considered  here  and  it  looks  now  as  though  it  may 
become  an  annual  affair. 

—Submitted  by  Roy  Houser  for  Harold  Jensen, 

Chairman. 


Birds    are 
entangled   by  their    feet, 
and   men  by  their  * 

tongues. 


DISTRICT        DOINGS 

The  RESERVE  SOIL  CONSERVATION  DISTRICT 
(now  the  Sheridan  County  Soil  &  Water  Conserva- 
tion District)  has  been  named  grand  award  con- 
servation district  for  1961-1962. 

This  district  was  named  by  state  agricultural 
leaders  who  reviewed  the  work  of  farmers  and 
supervisors  of  seven  districts  entered  in  the  15th 
annual  Soil  Conservation  Awards  Program  of  the 
Goodyear  Tire  &  Rubber  Company,    Akron  Ohio. 

Two  men  from  the  district,  Dale  F.  Bummer, 
Westby,  and  Jack  Rasmussen,  Antelope,  will  be 
guests  of  the  rubber  company  on  a  four -day  tour 
to  Goodyear  Farms  in  December  to  study  con- 
servation on  the  14, 000  acre  desert  farm. 

Secnnd  place  honors  were  won  by  the  Roosevelt 
Soil  &  Water  Conservation  Districts,  which  named 
Eldon  Picard,  Bainville,  as  the  outstanding  farmer- 
cooper  ator. 

*********** 
John  Marks  writes  in  the  Townsend  Star: 

Conservation  Camp  was  held  this  year  at  Bitter- 
root  Youth  Camp  in  Flathead  county.    This  camp 
is  located  about  thirty  miles  from  Kalispell  and 
is  situated  in  a  beautiful  spot  in  the  mountains. 

I  won  my  trip  in  January  by  giving  a  demonstra- 
tion on  "How  Organic  Matter  Helps  Soil  Structure". 
Arlene  Bieber  was  the  other  camper  from  this 
county  and  Vic  Hoxsey,  who  took  us  to  camp. 

There  were  more  than  one  hundred  4-H  members, 
Country  Extension  Agents  and  leaders  from  over 
Montana  attending  this  camp,  as  well  as  three 
Canadian  4-H  members. 

There  was  a  choice  of  four  workshops:    Range 
Management,  Fish  and  Wildlife,  Forestry  and 
Soil  and  Water  Conservation.    I  chose  Range 
Management,  taught  by  Don  Ryerson,  assistant 
professor  of  range  management  and  Malcolm 
Adams,  County  Agent  of  Toole  County. 

The  scholarships  to  conservation  camp  are  paid 
for  by  Charles  L.  Horn,  president  of  Federal 
Cartridge  Corporation  of  Minneapolis.    Trans- 
portation to  and  from  camp  was  paid  by  Soil 
Conservation  District  of  BROADWATER  County. 


"If  the  government  can  legislate  two  yearly  tax 
tributes,  it  can  doubtless  legislate  us  a  couple  of  Sum- 
mers each  year  and  a  double  harvest  time.  How  else 
are  we  going  to  meet  these  ever  increasing  taxes?" 
—Hybres  to  Mark  Anthony  in  42  B.  C. 


In  Granite  Soil  &  Water  Conservation  District, 
ditch  lining  is  underway  on  the  Southside  Canal, 
using  earthen  clay  compacted  in  place  with  heavy 
equipment.    Bud  Lane,  contractor  of  Three  Forks   4 
is  doing  the  work. 

Clyde  Sandon,  supervisor  of  BOX  ELDER  SWCD 
in  Carter  County,  feels  that  a  big  problem  dis- 
tricts have  is  in  the  way  we  misrepresent  our 
ranges  and  conservation  improvements  and 
criticize  our  ranchers  for  not  doing  a  good  job. 
Clyde  points  to  the  bigger  and  better  calves  we 
are  weaning,  and  the  bigger  lambs  that  are  coming 
off  the  ranges.    There  must  be  an  awful  lot  of 
good  range  management  over  what  there  has  been 
to  do  this.    Sandon  is  also  a  member  of  the  Grass 
Conservation  Commission  which  administers  the 
State  Grazing  Districts.    They  have  done  a  won- 
derful job. 

A  special  meeting  was  called  by  Chairman  Jeffers 
of  the  MADISON  SWCD  to  discuss  ways  and  means 
of  dealing  with  range  fires.    Representatives  from 
Fire  districts,  Sheriffs  Office,  County  Commis- 
sioners, Forest  Service,  Soil  Conservation  Ser- 
vice, and  Extension  Service  attended. 

Larry  Osburnsen,  Area  Conservationist,  at 
Missoula  believes  that  officers  of  Public  Land 
Agencies  should  be  re-alerted,  or  reminded  to 
fill  out  From  2  of  th  NACD  survey  which  districts  M 
have  asked  them  to  do.    Will  you  Forest  Service, 
BLM,  Indian  Service,  Bureau  of  Reclamation, 
people  who  read  this  take  notice  ?     And  Soil  Con- 
servation Service  on  private  lands  ?    District 
Chairmen  might  get  on  the  phone  too'. 

Customer:  "Why  do  you  have  an  apple  for  your 
trademark?" 

Tailor:  "If  it  hadn't  been  for  an  apple,  where  do 
you  suppose  the  clothing  business  would  be  today?" 

GLACIER  COUNTY  SWCD  at  their  last  meeting 
signed  agreements  with  Don  Kraft  and  Axel  Hanson 
and  reviewed  a  Conservation  plan  for  Dale  and 
Herman  Vermulm.    Gordon  Maston  WUC  and  Lyle 
VanDover,  BIA  technician  reported  on  conserva- 
tion activities  within  the  district.    Plans  for  the 
Triangle  SWCD  Supervisors  meeting  in  October 
was  discussed. 

LEWIS  &  CLARK  SWCD  conducted  a  twilight  range 
tour  with  Joe  Zacek,  SCS  range  specialist  on  the 
Frank  Thompson  Ranch  August  15.    A  legislative 
condidates  tour  is  also  being  planned.    Subscrip- 
tions to  "Soil  Conservation"  were  purchased  for 
secretary,  supervisors,  and  legislative  candidates.  * 


There  are  no  hopeless  situations;  there  are  only  men 
who  have  grown  hopeless  about  them. 

-CLAIRE  BOOTH  IUCE 


CONSERVATION 
EDUCATION 

It  is  school  time  again.    Montana  youngsters  will 
be  learning  many  things,  among  them  Conservation. 
Many  Montana  Soil  &  Water  Conservation  Districts 
include  in  their  Educational  Programs  tours  for 
Grade  School  children,  visits. to  schools  by  Super- 
visors, County  Agents,  Technicians,  to  pass  out 
literature  on  Conservation,  to  show  Conservation 
films,  to  give  talks,  to, sponsor  Conservation 
Essays,  Conservation  Posters,  to  provide  teachers 
with  teaching  materials,  etc.    Many  districts  offer 
substantial  prizes  in  the  many  types  of  contests. 

During  the  summer  range  tours  for  cUttdren  and 
adults,  are  popular.    Water  Conservation  and 
Wildlife  is  studied.    School  Teachers  attend  Con- 
servation Workshops  offered  by  Montana  Colleges. 
4-H  members  attend  Conservation  Camp. 

Science  Fairs  in  Montana  schools  show  greater 
interest  in  Conservation  projects.    Textbooks 
used  in  our  schools,  have  much  Conservation 
material  and  references. 

Soil  &  Water  Conservation  District  Supervisors 
together  with  the  wonderful  progress  of  Extension 
Agents,  4-H,  school  teachers,  colleges,  Boy 
Scouts,  Conservation  Groups,  and  Conservation 
agencies,  can  take  much  credit  for  the  above. 

How  does  Conservation  Education  Program  do  in 
your  district? 

Following  is  a  typical  and  suggested  set  up  for  youi 
district: 

Chairman  of  Board  appoints  a  Supervisor  as  chair- 
man of  Districts  Education  Committee.    This 
Education  Chairman  appoints  his  committee  by 
asking  some  or  all  of  the  following  to  help  formu- 
late the  District  Conservation  Education  program: 
Superintendent  of  Schools,  County  Agent,  School 
teacher,  Vo-ag  instructor,  4-H  leader,  Boy  or 
Girl  Scout  Leader,  Fish  &  Game  representative, 
Sportsmen's  representative,  technicians  of  SCS, 
Forest  Service,  etc.    This  group  should  meet 
twice  a  year.    The  Supervisor  who  is  chairman 
should  report  on  progress,  activity,  or  problems, 
to  his  monthly  board  meeting,  and  include  in  his 
report  all  items  of  conservation  Education  going 
on  in  the  district.    A  District  Conservation    Edu- 
cation Program  would  include  many  of  the  items 
listed  above  together  with  when  it  will  be  done 
and  who  will  be  responsible. 

What  help  do  teachers  want  most  in  teaching  con- 
servation?   Research  by  school  administrators 
show  the  following:    (1)  Charts  of  basic  concepts; 
(2)  Lesson  outlines  to  follow;  (3)  Visual  Aids. 


Blaine  County  Soil  &  Water  Conservation  District 
have  distributed  "A  Conservation  Guide  for  Blaine 
County  Schools"  to  all  schools  in  their  district. 
This  booklet  was  prepared  by  Herb  DeVries,  County 
Agent,  and  applies  to  Conservation  in  Blaine  County 
as  well  as  the  State  and  Nation. 

Montana  Conservation  Council  have  prepared  a 
book  "The  Conservation  of  Montana's  Natural 
Resources,  A  Handbook  for  Montana  School  Teachers" 
for  use  with  another  booklet  titled"  Suggested 

Activities  for  the  Teaching  of  the  Conservation 
of  Natural  Resources".    These  booklets  are 
available  at  Reporter  Printing  and  Supply  Co. , 
Billings,  Montana.    They  have  excellent  lesson 
outlines  and  visual  aid  references. 

A  text -workbook  titled  "Learning  about  Soil  & 
Water  Conservation"  is  available  from  the  John- 
sen  Publishing  Company,  1135-37  R.  Street, 
Lincoln  8,  Nebraska. 

Montana  State  University  School  of  Education  has 
published  a  "Study  Guide  for  Teaching  Conserva- 
tion" which  was  prepared  by  a  Conservation  Work- 
shop in  1957.    This  book  contains  excellent  out- 
lines for  integration  of  Conservation  in  all  classes, 

grades  1-8,  together  with  many  library  references. 

************* 

What  concern  is  Conservation  Education  to  Dis- 
trict Supervisors? 

Education  is  the  key  to  any  program.    Therefore 
supervisors  must  recognize  Conservation  Educa- 
tion of  highest  importance,  for  only  a  conserva- 
tion-minded people  can  safe  guard  and  improve 
our  remaining  heritage  of  renewable  resources  in 
the  future.  Contacts  must  be  made  with  educators 
to  get  the  job  done  if  it  is  not  being  done,  to  assist, 
encourage,  plan,  provide. 

Supervisors  know  that  many  times  the  lessons  of 
conservation  teaching  that  the  parents  otherwise 
would  not  hear  reach  the  ears  of  adults  from  the 
mouths  of  children. 

Supervisors,  why  not  make  a  date  to  visit  your 
local  School  Superintendent,  and  talk  Conserva- 
tion Education? 


I  am  only  one, 

But  still  I  am  one. 

I  cannot  do  everything. 

But  still  I  can  do  something; 

And  because  I  cannot  do  everything 

I  will  not  refuse  to  do  something  that 

I  can  do. 

—  EDWARD  EVERETT  HALE 


QnswMwnpMcje 


giAfenuj  pledge  as 

m(kmje#hcm~tbs<wemA> 
Wt^uii>u"t6  AAm&lrofn 
waste vke  rmtwml  resources 
o{jm^£ou*tt»Mj  —  its  soil 
ajnd,mme*als,  its  Wests, 
\tok#s  ami  wnUilie  .' 


District  Supervisors  can  remind  themselves  that 
we  are  pledged  not  only  to  Conservation  but  to 
Democracy  as  well. 

To  make  Democracy  strong  we  must  take  an  active 
part  as  citizens  in  government  or  some  Autocracy 
will.    District  Supervisors  have  the  additional 
responsibility  of  continuing  their  good  job  as 
officials  of  local  government.    It  might  be  useful 
to  review  our  obligations  under  our  State  laws 
which  provide  for  Districts. 


DATES  TO  REMEMBER 
Area  Meeting  Dates  are  as  follows: 
Area  I      October  2  Area  V       October  4 

Area  II     October  3  Area  VI     October  9 


■  # 


Area  III   October  10 
Area  IV    October  5 


Area  VII    October  11 
November 


State  Convention  November  15-16,  Livingston. 

Supervisors  should  devote  some  time  at  their 
September  District  meetings  reviewing  policy  and 
formulating  resolutions  for  presentation  at  their 
area  meetings.    The  Directors  of  your  Area  will 
welcome  your  writing  to  them.    Be  sure  to  have 
your  district  represented  at  your  area  meeting. 

****************** 

Peace  of  mind  may  transform  a  cottage  into  a  spacious  manor 
hall;  the  want  of  it  can  make  a  regal  park  an  imprisoning 
nutshell.  —joshua  loth  desman 

Happiness  grows  at  our  firesides,  and  is  not  to  be 
picked  in  strangers'  gardens.  -douglas  JERROLD 

TREASURE  ACRES  is  published  monthly  by  the 
Montana  Association  of  Soil  &  Water  Conservation 
Districts  with  assistance  from  Montana  State  Soil      ^ 
Conservation  Committee.    The  present  mailing 
list  includes  all  supervisors,  county  agents,  WUCsp 
area  and  state  officials  of  state  and  federal  agencies, 
all  County  School  Superintendents,  all  High  School 
Principals,  all  weekly  and  daily  newspapers,  all 
Chambers  of  Commerce,  Farm  Organizations,  and 
several  out-of-state  addresses,  our  Congressmen 
and  Senators,  and  State  Officials. 


4/evei  yoast  cqycp: 


■•oSSKS 


oil  a   Mont 


BULK  RATE 
U  S  Postage 

PAID 
Permit  #171 
Butte,  Montana 


.i 


i  V.A' 


333.7^- 


JV*'  ^fr^Ca         ^>0sJ-  ^ec  • 


reasune 


STATE  DOCUMENTS 


November -December  1962 

SEASONS  GREETINGS 


•*»ott<P 


Frank  Thompson 
President,  MASWCD 

Your  Association  President  Sez:      From  all 
reports  the  convention  In  Livingston  must  have 
been  a  success.    We  were  very  sorry  not  to 
have  been  able  to  be  with  you.    We  very  humbly 
accept  the  offices  you  saw  fit  to  elect  us  to  and 
with  all  of  your  good  help  we  will  strive  to  make 
a  better  association.     Making  the  best  better. 

The  time  of  year  is  here  again  when  we  want 
to  start  thinking  about  where  we  are  going  in 
the  months  ahead.    Before  we  go  too  far  with 
our  plans  for  next  year  it  may  be  well  to  look 
back  and  evaluate  just  how  much  we  have  ac- 
complished in  the  past  year.    Do  we  want  to 
follow  the  same  old  rut  or  make  a  new  trail 
and  explore  for  some  new  ideas  ? 


Mrs.  Frank  Thompson 

President,   Ladies  Auxiliary,   MASWCD 

The  Secretary  of  Agriculture  has  suggested  a 
new  memorandum  of  understanding  that  should 
be  acted  upon  by  district  supervisors  some 
time  this  coming  year.     Under  this  new  pro- 
gram supervisors  will  have  increased  respon- 
sibility that  will  of  necessity  demand  much 
more  elaborate  and  far  reaching  plans. 

Any  plan  for  a  New  Year  would  not  be  complete 
without  a  few  goals  to  work  toward.    To  mention 
a  few: 

1.    To  devise  a  program  whereby  districts  will 
have  proper  financing  so  they  can  carry  out 
an  efficient  district  and  educational  program. 

con),   next  page 


2.  To  carry  out  a  public  educational  program 
which  will  carry  the  conservation  story  to 
every  man,  woman,  and  child  in  the  state. 

3.  To  support  any  action  taken  by  other  groups 
to  conserve  Montana  water  for  Montana  and  to 
have  the  160  acre  limitation  waived  when  only 
supplemental  water  is  supplied. 


Husband:  "Well,  dear,  I've  just  had  my  life  in- 
sured  for   550,000!" 

Wife:  "That's  nice.  Now  I  won't  have  to  keep 
lulling  you  to  be  careful  every  place  you  go." 


MASWCD  Convention  a  Success. 

Supervisors  and  friends  of  Districts  from  all 
areas  of  Montana  traveled  to  Livingston 
November  13-15  to  attend  the  21st  Annual 
Meeting  of  their  association. 

Probably  the  highlight  of  the  Convention  was 
the  fine  talk  by  Governor  Tim  Babcock  on 
the  theme  "Conservation  Builds  Recreation,  " 
The  Governor  told  of  recreation  being  a 
$100,  000, 000  business  in  Montana  and  of  the 
opportunities  Montana  has  of  expanding  on 
this,  and  of  efforts  of  various  state  agencies 
in  developing  recreation. 

As  one  reporter  pointed  out  25  years  ago  when 
districts  were  first  being  organized  the  theme 
was  "Conservation  for  Survival"  and  in  con- 
trast this  year's  theme  was  "Conservation 
Builds  Recreation. "  Montana  has  come  a  long 
way  as  a  result  of  Soil  and  Water  Conservation 
programs. 

But,  the  more  than  200  conservationists  who 
were  in  Livingston  looked  back  with  pride  at 
their  record  of  conservation  in  Montana,  yet 
recognized  that  their  task  was  far  from  com- 
plete.   Farmers  and  ra  ihers  are  individua- 
lists, yet  they  must  reidize  that  in  a  modern 
era  they  must  adapt  of  technological  change 
and  advance. 


The  program,  the  )  esolutions  and  the  subject 
matter  presented  by  speakers,  panel  groups, 
committees  and  officers  emphasized  repeatedly 
the  importance  of  education  and  cooperation, 
rather  than  multi-million  dollar  handouts.    They 
emphasized  the  need  for  Conservation  educa- 
tional programs  at  all  levels  of  elementary, 
secondary  and  higher  educational  systems,  as 
well  as  among  adults,  the  imporance  of  better 
understanding  between  country  End  city  folks, 
between  various  government  agencies  and  in- 
dividuals. 


The  recognition  of  the  importance  of  recreation 
pointed  up  the  greater  leisure  time,  the  mobility 
of  people,  the  heavy  travel  as  a  result  of  im- 
proved highways,  the  need  for  camping  and  road- 
side parks,  and  the  necessity  to  preserve  water ^ 
sheds,  forest  and  park  areas,  clear  streams      ^ 
and  our  scenic  resources,  which  increasingly 
become  more  and  more  important  as  a  continuous 
source  of  income. 

The  delegates  and  their  wives  lauded  the  hospit- 
ality of  Livingston,  the  excellent  meeting  facili- 
ties of  the  Elks  temple  and  the  work  of  the  local 
committee  in  making  arrangements.    The  group 
included  Carl  H.  Johnson,  chairman  of  the  Park 
Soil  Conservation  District  board  of  supervisors, 
general  chairman;  Supervisors  Clarene  Walton, 
William  F.  D'Ewart,  Floyd  Peterson  and  Lee 
Cowan;  District  Conservationist  Ken  Bolland, 
SCS  Engineer  Ted  Neuman,  and  County  Agent 
Tom  Glennie.    The  wives  of  the  supervisors 
assisted  with  the  arrangements  and  were  in 
charge  of  table  decorations. 

Fred  Martin,  publisher  of  the  Park  County  News, 
did  an  outstanding  job  of  filling  in  for  the  banquet 
speaker,  Alf  Larson  of  Minnesota  who  did  not 
show. 

Among  resolutions  passed  were  to  ask  the  1963 
Legislature  for  $24,000  for  the  biennium  to 
operate  local  Soil  and  Water  Conservation  Dis-    ' 
tricts.    This  is  the  first  such  request.    District 
committees  have  always  operated  on  their  own 
time  and  expense  money.    John  Schroeder  of 
Lolo  was  appointed  chairman  of  the  committee 
to  seek  funds. 

Another  appropriation  asked  by  the  association 
was  for  hiring  a  conservation  education  super- 
visors in  the  Department  of  Public  Instruction. 
This  position  is  now  vacant  because  of  lack  of 
funds . 

Some  of  the  other  resolutions  adopted 

Urge  congressional  representatives  in  Washing  - 
ton  to  give  more  support  to  small  watershed 
projects  for  the  storage  of  water  upstream. 

Go  on  record  as  being  opposed  to  any  minimum 
flow  regulations  unless  water  needed  to  maintain 
that  flow  is  provided  by  additional  storage  fac- 
ilities. 

Seek  Legislation  to  exempt  water  development 
above  Canyon  Ferry  from  the  160  acre  limitation 

Have  stricter  supervision  of  conservation  needs 
on  State  Lands. 

Seek  legislation  which  will  footer  good  conserva- 
tion practical  by  leasees  of  ft  ate  Lands. 


' 


I 


Wm.  F.  D'Ewart,  a  member  ot  the  Montana  State  Soil  Conservation  Committee,  and  Gov.  Tim  Bab- 
cock,  seated,  were  on  hand  as  D.  E.  Roberts,  representing  Goodyear,  presented  Gordon  Holte, 
center,  and  K.  Kaae  of  the  Sheridan  Soil  Conservation  District,  the  first  place  Goodyear  award  in 
the  state  district  competition.    In  the  picture  at  right  are  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Leslie  Criswell  of  Hysham, 
who  as  presidents  of  the  State  Association  and  Auxiliary  presided  during  the  convention  sessions. 
At  right  is  the  Association  secretary -treasurer,  Dick  Setterstrom  of  Butte. 


MASWCD  Convention  Continued  -  - 

Protest  the  pollution  of  streams  and  watersheds 
by  brakish  water  and  oil. 

Recommend  that  all  oil  fields  be  policed  at  reg- 
I  ular  entervals  to  prevent  pollution. 

Urge  that  conservation  be  a  required  basic  sub- 
ject to  be  taught  in  all  colleges  and  universities 
as  a  prerequisite  to  any  degree  given. 


Elmer  Eklund,   Barber 

Jerry  Kolar,  Stanford 

Carl  Johnson,   Shields  Rte,   Livingston 

Leslie  Criswell,  Hysham 

Jack  Iman,  Victor 

Ralph  Tower,  Poison 

Pete  Jackson,   Norris 

Frank  Thompson,  Wolf  Creek 

Oscar  Hippe  has  a  year  to  go  on  his  present 
term  as  NACD  Councilman  from  Montana 


Look  to  Extension  to  Provide  Leadership  and 
suggest  programs  of  conservation  education, 
and  help  organize  them.    County  Agents  and 
Extension  Conservation  Specialist  staffs  should 
be  fully  maintained  to  give  maximum  assis- 
tance to  districts  in  conservation  education. 

A  complete  report  of  the  proceedings  of  the 
convention  will  be  mailed  to  all  supervisors, 
Conservation  agencies,  others  may  receive 
copies  by  writing  for  them. 

Officers  elected  at  the  Director's  meeting  were 
Frank  Thompson,  Wolf  Creek,   President;  Bill 
Kesler,  Kalispell,  Vice  President;  Dick  Setter- 
strom,  Butte,  Secretary;  and  Gene  Coombs, 
Billings,  Treasurer.    Jack  Tweedy,  Cut  Bank, 
was  elected  to  the  Executive  Committee  to 
serve  with  Thompson  and  Kesler.     Directors 
of  the  association  are: 

Gordon  Holte,   Plenty  wood 
Oscar  Hipe,   Froid 
Kenneth  Edwards,  Glendive 
Harold  Jensen,  Baker 
Ralph  Briggs,  Cascade 
.lack  Tweedv.  Cut  Rank 


Great  Falls  was  chosen  as  the  1963  Convention 
site  which  will  be  November  13,  14,  15. 


"Tntmh  dav">" 


CONSERVATION  CHARLEY 

Charley  was  bellying  up  by  Harry  Corry  in  the 
bar  in  "Duncan's  Dungeon."    He'd  stopped  in 
for  a  beer  to  stabilize  his  nerves  before  tying 
on  the  feed  bag. 

It's  quiet  in  the  Dungeon.  ^The  lights  are  dim. 
The  juke  box  has    laryngitis.    There  isn't  a 
single  bar  fly  caging  drinks.    Charley's  nerves 
are  purring  contentedly. 

He  raises  his  glass  and  sips  the  beer.    His 
eye  sights  down  the  length  of  the  glass  and 
zeros  in  on  another  pair  of  eyes—big,  brown 
eyes  stares  back  the  age  old  setting  for  ro- 
mance. 

Charley  can't  help  smiling  out  loud.    Any  other 
fellow  in  this  situation  would  be  swapping  glances 
with  a  radiant  redhead— or  a  beautiful  brunette. 
The  best  Charley  can  do  is  tangle  eyeballs  with 
a  brown-eyed  elk's  head  hanging  on  the  wall. 

Brown  Eyes  seems  sad.    Charley  can't  help 
noticing  the  fly  specks  on  the  pupils.    And  the 
sparkle  of  the  glass  eyeballs  is  dulled  by  a  film 
of  grease  and  smoke  which  has  accumulated 
through  the  years.    The  hair  on  the  neck  and  head 
is  dusty  and  unkept.    The  rack,  which  grazes  the 
ceiling,  is  a  relic  from  a  wild,  free  world  far 
from  the  stale  air  of  the  Dungeon. 

Charley  feels  sad,  too.    He  tries  to  visualize 
this  motheaten  wall  fixture  gliding  regally  through 
the  pine -scented  air  of  some  far  away  mountain 
fastness.    Brown  Eyes  must  have  been  a  proud 
and  graceful  creature  in  those  days. 

Chuck  is  jarred  out  of  his  reverie  by  a  rough 
belligerent  voice,   "Whatcha   staring  at?", 
asks.  uOHAT<^A" 

Beer  dribbles  down        »     * 
Charley's  chin  as  his  s 
mouth  gapes  open. 

Is  that  taxidermist's 
puppet  talking  to  him  ? 


"Yeah.    I'm  talking  to  you.  "   This  time  there's 
no  mistake  about  it.    The  head  on  the  wall  is 
speaking. 

"I  was  just  wondering  how  a  feller  like  you  can 
hang  around  a  place  like  this,"  Charley  stammers. 
"Must  be  pretty  dead  around  here  with  no  cows 
to  chase." 


"I  can  think  of  things  I'd  rather  do  than  look  at 
bleary -eyed  beer  kegs  like  you  all  day,"  the 
head  admits.    "But  from  where  I  hang  it  doesn't 
look  like  I've  got  much  choice. "  f 

He  pauses  and  curls  his  lip  to  chase  a  pestiferous 
fly  away. 

"Course,  things  were  pretty  tough  out  there  at 
times,  too,  "  he  continues.    "Spring,  summer 
and  fall  were  great.    We  had  plenty  to  eat,  the 
sun  was  warm  and  the  woods  were  full  of  friendly 
girls."    He  drools  a  little  over  the  memory. 

"Winter  was  murder,  though."    He  shudders  at 
the  thought. "The  snow  was  deep,  our  winter 
range  was  small  and  the  winds  were  cold.  There 
wasn't  enough  food  for  all  of  us.    We'd  get  weaker 
and  weaker.    We'd  crowd  together  and  die.    When 
Spring  came  the  ground  was  littered  with  the 
dead.    It  was  horrible  to  see  all  the  youngsters 
who  never  had  a  chance. " 

He  chokes  up  for  a  minute  and  can't  go  on. 
When  he  regains  control  of  his  voice  he  contin- 
ues.   "A  hunter's  bullet  can  sometimes  be 
merciful.    The  one  that  felled  me  spared  me 
the  agonies  of  another  bleak  and  hungry  winter. 
Many  of  the  deer  and  elk  and  antelope  you  see 
sprawled  out  on  cars  and  pickups  these  days 
are  pretty  lucky,  too.    They're  not  going  to  slowly 
and  painfully  starve  to  death.  " 

"Our  range  is  just  like  a  cattle  range.    It  can  be 
overgrazed.    Too  many  critters  eat  for  too  long 
on  an  area  and  the  grub  runs  out.    Old  Mom 
Nature  is  a  tough  nut  in  some  ways.    She  gets 
rid  of  surplus  animals  one  way  or  another.    If 
the  winter,  doesn't  get  them  she'll  get  rid  of  them 
with  disease,  predators  or  starvation. 

He  sneezes  as  he  gets  a  snoot  full  of  second-hand 
cigarette  smoke. 


"Our  range  has  to  be  managed  just  like  cattle  and 
sheep  range, "  he  says.    "Much  as  I  hate  to  ad- 
mit it  wildlife  is  just  another  crop  from  the  land. 
We're  harvested  each  year  by  one  means  or  another. 
There's  some  satisfaction  in  ending  up  on  some- 
one's table  rather  than  as  coyote  bait  out  in  the 
forest. 

"Yeah,  this  is  kind  of  a  lonely  place  to  spend  the 
rest  of  my  days  but  it  beats  being  a  pile  of  bones 
out  there.  "    And  he  bobs  his  head  towards  the 
distant  mountains. 

Charley  suddenly  gulps  his  beer  and  heads  for  the 
door.    When  a  stuffed  elk  head  starts  talking  to 
a  feller — and  making  good  sense — it's  time  to 
vamoose.    Next  thing  you  know  it'll  turn  pink  and 
come  down  to  prance  on  the  bar. 

They  must  be  packing  a  lot  of  dynamite  In  beer 
these  days. 


i 


SWCD  OFFICERS    -    EXTENSION  MEET 

Several  weeks  ago  Leslie  Criswell,   President  of 
^\S\VCD,   Carl  Johnson,  MAWSCD  Education 
■ommittee  Chairman,  Frank  Thompson  and  O. 
M.  Ueland  met  with  Extension  Director  Torleif 
Aasheim,   Program  Leader  Don  Luebbe,  and 
County  Agent  Supervisors  Bob  Rassmussen,  Rex 
Campbell,  and  Art  Jacobs  to  discuss  ways  dis- 
tricts can  better  use  extension  and  vice  versa. 
It  was  explained  that  with  the  abolishing  of  the 
position  of  Extension  Conservationist,  those  duties 
were  absorbed  by  the  Program  Leader  for  Agri- 
cultural Production  and  Conservation  Don  Luebbe, 
and  the  various  specialists.    However  it  was  point- 
ed out  Don  has  been  on  leave  for  a  year,  that  a 
Range  Management  Specialist  Karl  Parker  is  on 
leave,  that  Don  Ryerson  was  serving  only  one 
half  time  as  Range  Specialist,  that  no  Irrigation 
(Water  Management)  Specialist  was  now  employed, 
and  that  these  men  were  very  badly  needed.    These 
positions  were  cut  down  largely  as  a  result  of  the 
austerity  program  of  the  last  legislature. 

On  the  County  Agent  level  it  was  brought  out  that 
districts  are  using  Agents  only  as  secretaries 
and  very  little  else.   There  was  some  disagree- 
ment as  to  initiative  County  Agents  should  take 
as  opposed  to  the  initiative  displayed  by  super- 
visors.   Weaknesses  were  brought  out  in  plan- 
ning and  participation  of  agents  and  supervisors 
n  planning. 

The  following  points  were  advanced  as  being 
items  that  would  benefit: 

1.  Planning — Inasmuch  as  agents  are  making 
their  plans  for  the  coming  year  in  October ,  the 
Conservation  parts  of  these  plans  could  be  sub- 
mitted to  the  Board  of  Supervisors  for  review 
and  approval  and  adopted  as  part  of  the  District 
Work  Program. 

2.  Conservation  Specialists  -  that  districts  make 
their  wishes  known  to  proper  authorities,  legis- 
lature, and  governor  in  order  to  provide  the  nec- 
essary funds  for  specialists  in  range  management, 
water  management,  soils,  agronomy,  forestry, 
weeds,  etc. 

3.  Provide  extension  specialists  and  supervisors 
with  meeting  dates  and  places  and  extend  standing 
invitation  to  attend  meetings  whenever  they  are  in 
the  area.  Provide  County  Agent  Supervisors  with 
minutes  and  reports. 


> 


4.  Agents  attend  meetings,  aid  in  conduct  of, 
give  evaluations. 

5.  Agents  make  regular  reports  to  district  super- 
visors of  their  conservation  activities. 

6.  Give  ideas,  observations,  recommendations. 


7.  Take  leadership  in  carrying  out  tours,  educa- 
tional efforts,  special  meetings. 

8.  Emphasize  management. 

9.  Assist  with  news  articles  conservation 
features. 

10.    Assist  with  leadership  Workshops. 


To   be  positive   is  to  be  mistaken   .it 
the  top  of   your  voice. 


STATE  SOIL  CONSERVATION  COMMITTEE  AND 
STATE  ASC  COMMITTEE  MEET 

Montana's  State  Soil  Conservation  Committee  had 
as  its  guests  at  its  November  meeting  in  Living- 
ston all  the  members  of  the  State  Agricultural 
and  Stabilization  Committee,  USDA.    The  Con- 
servation programs  of  Districts  and  ACP  were 
discussed.    Good  working  relationships  were 
reported  in  most  counties.    Areas  of  further  co- 
ordination were  expressed  in  the  need  for  ASC 
reporting  to  or  representation  at  District  Meetings 
and  the  need  for  further  emphasis  of  appropriate 
agreements  as  supplemental  memorandums  of 
understanding  could  provide,  to  be  given  greater 
attention  by  each  agency.    It  was  agreed  to  have 
more  exchange  of  information  between  the  two 
agencies  to  include  ASC  County  Committee  and 
District  Supervisors  on  each  others  mailing  list. 

Inasmuch  as  cost  sharing  for  stubble  mulch  will 
not  be  offered  this  year,  consideration  was  given 
to  use  of  these  funds  for  greater  emphasis  on  other 
Conservation  practices. 

The  need  to  get  greater  control  of  Nosious  and 
some  other  weeds  was  stressed  as  a  growing  con- 
servation problem.  Also  the  need  for  range  man- 
agement practices,  especially  prevention  of  over- 
grazing. Efforts  would  be  made  to  encourage  use 
oT  some  available  money  to  correct  these  situa- 
tions. 

ASC  Committee  members  attending  were  Bob 
McKenna,  Chairman,  Wiola  Herak,   Charlo, 
Arthur  Anderson,  Sioux  Pass,  Lee  Schumacher, 
Malta,  and  George  Johnson,  Cut  Bank.    Also 
Paul  Ringling,  Executive  Director,  and  Clarence 
Bruce  of  the  state  office. 

Fred  Sanborn,  Soil  Conservation  Committee  Chair- 
man, expressed  appreciation  to  the  ASC  people  for 
their  fine  cooperation  and  the  Committee's  desires 
to  meet  together  once  every  year. 

Other  business  taken  care  of  was  to  approve  ap- 
plications and  set  hearings  for  change  of  district 
boundaries  in  Yellowstone  and  Big  Horn  for  Dec- 
ember 13,  and  Missoula  and  Bitterroot  for  Dec- 
ember 19.    Applications  for  additions  to  North 
Custer  were  submitted  and  a  hearing  set  for  Dec- 
ember 11  at  Miles  City,    (continued  next  page.) 


A  Watershed  Application  from  Upper  Musselshell 
district  requesting  planning  for  Flood  Control 
primarily  for  town  of  Harlowton  was  approved. 
An  application  for  Watershed  development  in 
Wvoming  with  waters  originating  in  Carbon  County 
Montana  was  referred  to  the  State  Engineer  for 
clearance  under  the  Montana-Wyoming  compact. 


LEADERSHIP  WORKSHOPS 

Leadership  Workshops  for  SWCD  Supervisors, 
ASC  Committeemen,  Agency  People,  and  others 
who  may  be  interested  are  scheduled  for  half  of 
Montana's  districts  as  follows: 

January  8        Granite,  Deer  Lodge  Valley, 
North  Powell  at  Drummond 

January  10      Bitterroot,  Missoula,  Mineral 
at  Missoula 

January  30      Broadwater,  Lewis  &  Clark  at 
Helena 

February  12  Toole  &  Liberty  at  Shelby 

February  13  Hill,  Big  Sandy,  Chouteau  at 
Big  Sandy 

February  14  Judith  Basin  &  Fergus  at 
Lewistown 

February  19   McCone,  Richland,  Garfield  at 
Circle 

February  21  Dawson,  Wibaux,   Prairie  County 
Grazing  District  at  Glendive 

February  28  Yellowstone,  Big  Horn  at 
Billings 

March  1  Stillwater  &  Carbon  at  Bridger 

March  5  Roosevelt  &  Valley  at  Glasgow 

The  workshops  will  be  conducted  from  9:30  A.M. 
to  4:00  P.M.    The  morning  sessions  will  deal 
with  Leadership  and  the  afternoon  sessions  will 
be  on  District  Planning  &  Administration. 
County  Agent  Supervisors,  County  Agents,  Area 
and  Work  Unit  Conservationists,  and  O.  M.  Ueland 
of  the  State  Soil  Conservation  Committee  will 
instruct. 

Supervisors  in  adjoining  districts  who  couldn't 
attend  last  year's  sessions  are  urged  to  attend 
these  meetings. 


LEGISLATIVE  COMMITTEE  REPORT 
Lolo, 

John  Schroeder  has  been  appointed  MSWCD  Leg- 
islative Committee  Chairman  by  President  Frank 
Thompson.    The  two  spent  a  busy  day  in  Helena     * 
recently  meeting  various  people  in  regard  to         ( 
carrying  out  resolutions  of  the  recent  convention. 
Arrangements  were  made  with  the  Attorney  Gen- 
eral's office  to  draw  up  bills  to  present  to  the  leg- 
islature in  regard  to  an  appropriation  of  $24,000 
for  District  Operations,  and  to  amend  the  law 
requiring  seeding  of  disturbed  right-of-ways  to 
include  cable  lines,  gas  and  oil  lines,  etc. 

Harriet  Miller  expressed  her  desires  of  the  im>- 
portance  of  a  Conservation  Education  Supervisor 
in  her  department,  and  Miss  Miller  was  assured 
that  the  MSWCD  would  support  all  efforts  to  get 
a  Supervisor.    Others  visited  were  Mons  Teigen, 
State  Land  Commissioner,  Water  Board  Engineer 
George  Sahinen,  State  Engineer  Fred  Buck,  and 
Budget  Director  Nelson. 


?he  Indian  appeared  before 
the  justice, asking  a  divorce. 

Asked  to  give  his  reasons, 
he  said: 

"When  I  plant  corn,  I  get 
corn.  When  I  plant  spinach,  I 
get  spinach.  When  I  plant  bar- 
ley, I  get  barley.  But  when  I 
plant  an  Indian,  and  get  a 
Chinaman,  I  want  a  divorce." 


I 


"Female  voice9  What  female  voice,   dear0" 


We  are  sorry  to  learn  of  the  passing  of  Edwin 
Larson,  Brockton,  Montana  supervisor  of  the 
Culbertson-Bainville  Soil  and  Water  Conserva 
lion  I )i .strict. 


WHAT 


WHO 
HOW 


I  WHEN 


WHERE 


WHY 


DISTRICT  PROGRAM  —  ANNUAL  WORK  PLAN 

The  district  program  is  a  long  range  program  stating  the  purpose  of  the  district, 
the  general  condition  of  resources,  present  farming  and  ranching  conditions, 
conservation  problems  and  how  to  meet  them.    Soil  and  Water  Conservation 
being  basic  it  includes  planning  in  the  following; 


Soil  Improvement  &  Management 

Range  Management 

Water  Management 

Woodland  Management-Forestry 

Irrigation 

Field  Crops -Cropland 

Recreation 

Fish  &  Game 

Soil  Erosion  Prevention 

Watershed  Programs 

Underground  Water 


Great  Plains  Programs 

Agricultural  Conservation  Programs 

Public  Lands  Programs 

Rural-Urban  Planning 

Highway  Construction 

Mining 

Industrial  Development 

Pollution  Control  of  Water  &  Air 

Weed  Control 

Fire  Control 

Insect  Control 


The  Annual  Work  Plan  is  a  GUIDE  showing  What,  Who,  When,  Where,  How,  of 
Conservation   Problems  that  will  be  done  this  year,, 

Supervisors  with  assistance  of  any  group  or  agency  are  responsible  for  recognizing 
and  developing  a  Conservation  Program.    Supervisors  should  ask  for  recommenda- 
tions   and  cooperation  from  all  groups  and  agencies  and  all  groups  and  agencies 
should  voluntarily  or  otherwise  make  their  proposals  known  to  supervisors  for  the 
development  of  a  comprehensive  integrated  single  district  program.    Annual  work 
plans  should  be  worked  out  the  same  way. 

A  district  program  is  made  up  when  the  districts  is  first  organized.    Revisions 
are  made  as  conditions  change,  new  research  is  developed,  and  other  areas  be- 
come connected  with  Soil  and  Water  Conservation.    Districts  in  Montana  are  being 
asked  to  revise  their  old  programs  so  as  to  reflect  more  of  the  above  areas  of 
Conservation.    This  should  be  done  by  July  1,   1963.    An  Annual  Work  Plan  should 
be  made  up  on  a  yearly  basis,  usually  in  December  prior  to  the  new  calendar  year. 
Observations  are  made  all  the  time,  so  that  new  problems,  means,  etc. ,  can  be 
noted  and  included  in  the  next  plan. 

Programs  and  Plans  are  drawn  up  by  individuals  and  brought  together  at  the  Dis- 
trict Meeting  place  for  acceptance,  editing,  and  further  writing  up  by  a  person 
or  persons  designated  to  do  so.    Plans  and  Programs  are  given  to  everybody  con- 
cerned, and  publicized. 

A  district  program  is  a  basis  for  letting  the  Public  know  what  the  problems  are, 
what  the  benefits  are,  what  is  to  be  done  and  how,  and  why  they  should  be  con- 
cerned.   The  district  program  is  a  basis  for  negotiating  Basic,  Supplemental, 
and  other  appropriate  agreements  with  departments,  agencies,  and  groups,  or 
businesses.    District  programs  and  Annual  Work  Plans  show  what  funds  are 
needed  and  why,  who  benefits,  what  the  results  will  be.    Districts  are  organized 
under  State  Law  to  carry  out  a  program  of  protecting  its  Soil  and  Water  Resources! 

CONSERVATION  IS  EVERYBODYS  BUSINESS,  A  SOIL  AND  WATER  CONSERVATION 

DISTRICT  IS  YOUR  DISTRICT,  COOPERATE  WITH  IT. 


> 


At  the  Civil  Aeronautics  Ad- 
ministration, a  woman  applicant 
tilling;  out  a  job  questionnaire  got 
along  fine  until  she  came  to  the 
section  "Veterans  preference." 
After  thinking  it  over  she  wrote, 
"Sailors." 


Who's  Smarter? 
A  number  of  Bobby's  playmates 
were  noisily  calling  him  to  come 
out  and  play.  Presently  Bobby 
appeared  at  the  door  and  said,  "I 
can't  come  out  just  now,  I'm  tak- 
ing my  nap." 


*  <       r 

1 — K\ 


I 


Grassroots  participation  has  been  the  key  to  the  amazing  successes  credited  to  the 
Montana  Soil  Conservation  Districts  and  the  state  leaders  and  the  individual  farmers 
would  credit  this  success  to  the  efforts  of  the  elected  farmer  supervisors.    At  the 
Montana  convention  in  November,  special  awards  were  presented  to  four  20-year 
supervisors,  21  who  served  15  years  and  42  ten-year  members. 

Pictured  above  are  Elmer  Eklund,  left,  and  Henry  Hoye,  Froid,  (fifth  from  left,  and  to 
the  left  of  Gov.  T.  Babcock),  20-year  supervisors.    (Ken  Edwards,  second  from  left, 
accepted  the  award  for  Henry  R  .  Reinemer,  McCone,  and  Charles  Smith,  third  from 
left  for  Stanley  Wilson  of  Wibaux,  the  other  20-year  supervisors  who  were  not  present). 
The  three  at  the  right  of  the  picture  are,  1.  to  r. ,  State  Committee  Secretary  O.  M. 
Ueland,  Butte;  Supervisor  Clarence  Walton,  Wilsall,  and  A.  G.  Slattery,  Big  Horn. 

The  21  recipients  receiving  the  15-year  awards  were  Leo  J.  Carmody,  Jefferson 
Valley;  Irvin  Cox,  Little  Beaver,  Leslie  Criswell,  Treasure;  Jacob  Bieber,  McCone; 
Paul  Brenner  and  John  G.  Buttelman,  Three  Rivers;  Joe  Debrowski,  Wibaux;  Herman 
Friede,  Blaine;  Carl  Hunter,  Richland;  Oscar  Hippe,  Froid;  John  Meccage,  Little 
Beaver;  Gordon  McGowan,  Chouteau;  Clarence  Popham,  Bitterroot;  Clyde  Rader, 
Big  Horn;  Walter  L.  Sales,  Three  Rivers;  John  Schroeder,  Missoula;  J.  M.  Sholtus, 
Valley;  Charles  Stahl,  and  Ernest  Wills,  Missoula;  Ralph  Tower,  Lake;  Edgar 
Wetzeteon,  Bitterroot  and  Lister  Williams,  Box  Elder. 


Montana  Association  of  Soil  and 
Water  Conservation  Districts 
(Return  postage  guaranteed) 


i  yaa/c  ccpcycff: 


BULK  RATE 
U  S  Postage 

PAID 
Permit  No.  171 
Butte,  Montana 


( 


Library  HSU 
Missoula  Mont 


(