Skip to main content

Full text of "Variation in early growth of western white pine in north Idaho"

See other formats


Historic, archived document 


Do not assume content reflects current 
scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. 


A99.9 F764U f 


VARIATION IN EARLY GROWTH 
OF WESTERN WHITE PINE 
IN NORTH IDAHO 


R. J. STEINHOFF 


USDA FOREST SERVICE 
RESEARCH PAPER INT-222 
INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION 
FOREST SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 


ang 
: 
Nea yas 
; 
: 
aw 
% 
AY : 


USDA Forest Service 
Research Paper INT-222 
June 1979 


VARIATION IN EARLY GROWTH 
OF WESTERN WHITE PINE 
IN NORTH IDAHO 


R. J. Steinhoff 


INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION 
Forest Service 
U.S. Department of Agriculture 
Ogden, Utah 84401 


THE AUTHOR 


R. J. (RAY) STEINHOFF received his formal education at the University of 
Idaho, North Carolina State University, and Michigan State University. 
From 1963 to 1965, he worked at the Institute of Forest Genetics at 
Placerville, Calif., a part of the Pacific Southwest Forest and Range 
Experiment Station. Since 1965, he has been at the Moscow Forestry 
Sciences Laboratory where he is responsible for research on the genetics 
of growth and adaptation of western white pine and grand fir. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


Special thanks are due to Tony Squillace and Burton Barnes, formerly 
with this Station, who initiated the older studies reported on here and re- 
viewed the manuscript. Bob Campbell, geneticist with the Pacific North- 
west Station in Corvallis, also reviewed the manuscript and provided many 
helpful suggestions. My colleagues Ray Hoff, Geral McDonald, and Jerry 
Rehfeldt have also contributed materials, assistance, and encouragement. 


RESEARCH SUMMARY 


In nursery and field tests representing five different studies, most of the 
variation in height growth or other traits in any one test area was among se- 
edlings within family plots. Of tne useable genetic variation in those traits, 
most (60-90 percent) was related to differences among the parent trees within 
stands. The remaining genetic variation was spread among geographic areas, 
elevational zones, or stands within these categories. When differences among 
the latter catagories were significant, usually no pattern in the variation was 
apparent. Thus, although seedlings within families and family means within 
stands vary considerably, the lack of differences among stand means, or those 
for broader geographic areas, and the absence of distinct variation patterns 
suggests that inland western white pine is fairly uniform. However, seedlings 
from high-elevation parents (generally 1,375 m or higher) were significantly 
shorter than those of low- and mid-elevation parents in some low- or mid- 
elevation tests. Even when elevational effects were not significant very few 
high elevation families were among the tallest. Growth results to date indicate 
that only two seed zones are needed in north Idaho--a low zone and a high zone 
generally separated at 1,375 m. Within the lower zone, trees with good 
growth potential can be found in nearly all stands. 


CONTENTS 


INTRODUCTION ..... 
PRIOR RESEARCH . 
MATERIALS AND METHODS 
RESULTS . 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. 
APPLICATIONS 

PUBLICATIONS CITED. 


APPENDIX 


Page 


20 


21 


INTRODUCTION 


Western white pine (Pinus monttcola Dougl.) has long been an important component of 
the forests of north Idaho, but the introduction of blister rust (Cronartium rtbicola 
J.C. Fisch. ex Rabenh.) and the ensuing losses to the disease has dissuaded land mana- 
gers from attempting to manage the species. Now, as efforts to produce trees resistant 
to the disease show some promise, land managers are again beginning to include white 
pine in their regeneration programs. In the long run, the natural selection process 
should produce trees with sufficient blister rust tolerance or resistance to allow natu- 
ral regeneration. For the present and near future, however, planting of resistant seed- 
lings will be needed. 


The production and utilization of resistant planting stock involves much more than 
just securing an adequate level of resistance in a sufficient proportion of the seedlings 
to be planted. The manager wants the seedlings to survive and grow on the sites he wants 
to plant and he wants them to grow at a rate which fully utilizes the potential of the 
Site. Attempting to achieve such an ideal match of seedling and site is not a realistic 
goal at present because of our lack of knowledge of both trees and sites. Also, the 
costs to approximate such a match would likely exceed the returns from greater yields 
as the limits of the site are approached. The realistic goal for the present is to 
attempt to achieve a balance that incorporates our present biological information and 
approximate costs with expected growth rates and economic returns. 


This paper will discuss past and current investigations into variation in growth 
of western white pine in nursery trials and several experimental plantations. The 
conclusions of the research will then be translated into guidelines for distributing 
seed from orchards that have already been established and to evaluate alternative 
designs for future seed orchards. 


PRIOR RESEARCH 


During the past 20 years several reports on variation in western white pine have 
appeared. Squillace and Bingham (1958) opened the series with a report of "localized 
ecotypic variation" based on germination and early growth of seedlings from quite dif- 
ferent sites within a small area. They concluded that seedlings from trees growing on 
poorer sites were shorter in nursery trials than those from trees growing on better 
Sites. Germination of seeds in a sucrose solution was higher for poorer site trees 
than for better site trees. In a low-elevation nursery, seedlings from low-elevation 
trees were taller than those from high-elevation trees, but when transplanted to a 
high-elevation test site the seedlings from the high-elevation trees grew faster. On 
the basis of those findings, and other considerations, the applied program to produce 
blister rust resistant western white pine was subdivided into three elevational zones 
or breeding units with a seed orchard planned for each. These zones were: (1) Low- 
elevation--areas below 1,000 m; (2) mid-elevation--areas between 1,000 m and 1,250 m; 
and (3) high-elevation--areas above 1,250 m. 


Progeny of many of the same parents used in the above studies were outplanted to 
two additional sites for long-term evaluation. Rehfeldt and Steinhoff (1970) found that 
at age 14 average growth at the two sites differed significantly and that the growth of 
individual progenies differed significantly but the average growth of progenies from 
different localities did not differ significantly. 


In order to obtain materials representative of a broader range of sites, Barnes 
(1967) systematically collected seed and recorded data from trees in a series of eleva- 
tional plots along several north Idaho streams. He reported finding significant dif- 
ferences in periodic annual growth rate and branch angle that were related to eleva- 
tional differences along one transect. Trees in plots from 760 m elevation to 1,220 m 
grew at essentially the same rate, but those from 1,400 m and above were slower growing. 
Branch angle changed progressively from low to high plots, with trees in the lower plots 
having more ascending branches and those in the higher plots having more nearly hori- 
zontal branches. Differences among plots were also found in needle length and cone 
scale length and width, but the variation did not follow a pattern related to elevation. 


Some of the seed collected by Barnes was sown in a nursery trial in Michigan. 
After 4 years of growth, total height of seedlings representing the various elevational 
and latitudinal collection areas did not differ significantly (Townsend and others 1972). 
Seasonal growth rates differed, but they did not fit into a pattern related to elevation 
or latitude. At a very low light level (130 lux) low-elevation seedlings (640 m) were 
less efficient photosynthetically than higher elevation seedlings (1,065 m and 1,585 m), 
but at higher light levels (425 and 615 lux) differences were not apparent. 


MATERIALS AND METHODS 


This report will present and integrate results from five studies, as follows: 


I Elevational study.--This study was started to further investigate the effects 
of elevation (as indicated in Squillace and Bingham 1958) and possibly latitude on 
seedling growth. Wind-pollinated seed for the test was collected from individual trees 
in plots (stands) at 120 m to 180 m (mostly 150 m) elevational intervals in several 
stream drainages in north Idaho. Although the collection locations were often along 
streams, they were kept out of the stream bottoms where cold air drainage effects are 
common. Five trees from each of 1 to 3 plots per elevation and drainage were included, 
for a total of 225 trees in 45 plots (fig. 1). In the Trestle Creek drainage, the 
plots within an elevational zone were close together (mostly within 0.5 km), but in the 
other areas the plots were often several kilometers apart. Further details of plot loca- 
tion for the Trestle Creek drainage were presented by Barnes (1967). 


A nursery test for early growth and seedling traits was conducted for 3 years at 
Moscow, Idaho. The seed were sown at a spacing of 5x10 cm in 10-tree row plots in 4 
replicates. The growing medium was a mix of forest soil, sand, and peat moss in equal 
proportions. The beds were watered and fertilized as needed to maintain satisfactory 
growth. Annual height measurements were taken after growth was completed. 


Field plantations have been established at the Priest River Experimental Forest 
(PREF) and near the North Fork of the Clearwater River on the Canyon Ranger District 


(Canyon) (fig. 1). In each area, 3 test plantations were established with an eleva- 
tional separation of 300 m (800 m, 1,100 m, and 1,400 m at PREF and 900 m, 1,200 mn, 
and 1,500 m at Canyon). Aspect of the sites ranges from northeast to northwest. The 


field tests contain representatives of nearly all the seed collection areas and eleva- 
tion zones but do not contain representatives of all the plots within elevational zones. 


LEGEND 


©  Elevational Study Collection Areas 


Kaniksu © Natural Selection Study Collection Areas 


Boulder Creek 
VY Elevation-Aspect Study Collection Areas 


Trestle yw Nursery Test Sites 


Creek 


SO 


%& Elevational Study Plantations 


©  Vigor-Quality Plantations 


Factorial Mating Design Study Plantation 


St. Joe River 


Crystal Creek A COCO 
= A 
\ x Fernwood ~— e VV Marble Creek 
9 Neo Re Bae AY 
Clarkia ‘| NG Gold Center Creek 
6 | CJ White Rock 
(@) SS sy oe a aa a SS 5555 eTcC5 
Oneal 


\ a) 
| Elk Creek 


Bertha Hill 


N.F. Clearwater 


Figure 1.--Seed collection areas and test sites for the vartous white pine studies in 
north Idaho. 


An additional plantation (Ida Creek) adjacent to the low PREF site contains representa- 
tives of all the families included in the nursery test. The seedlings (3-0 stock) were 
planted in 1971 at a spacing of 1.8 m in 4-tree row plots replicated 5 times. They were 
all measured at age 4 (the end of the first field growing season). The Ida Creek plot 
was measured again at age 6 and age 8 and the other plantations were measured at age 7. 


Dis Elevation-aspect study. --An attempt was made to evaluate the effects of environ- 
mental factors related to both elevation and aspect in this test. Study areas were 
located in two drainages (Marble Creek and Gold Center Creek) near Clarkia, Idaho 
(fig. 1). They consisted of a series of paired plots at 950 m, 1,175. m, and 1,400 m in 
each drainage. One member of each elevational pair had a southern exposure and the 
other a northern exposure. In each plot, four trees were chosen to be seed parents and 
three to be pollen parents. Pollen from the three trees on a plot was mixed. Each seed 
tree was pollinated with four pollens, the local pollen mix plus pollens from the low-, 
mid-, and high-elevation north-aspect Marble Creek plots. For this portion of the study 
seeds from the four trees on a plot were combined for each pollen type. Results of 
crosses among individual trees within plots are being reported elsewhere (Rehfeldt, in 
press). 


A nursery test was conducted at Moscow for 3 years. Seed was sown in plots consist- 
ing of 2 rows of 18 planting spots. Spacing was 5xl0 cm. There were two replicates. 


The seedlings have been outplanted to forest test sites but have not yet been 
measured. 


Se Natural selectton study.--This test was originally designed for studying blis- 
ter rust resistance, but its potential for studying growth variation within and between 
stands was soon recognized. Ten stands were located and wind-pollinated seed collected 
from 50 trees in each. Three of the stands are from the same general areas represented 
by most of the trees in the vigor-quality study (No. 5 below) and one stand corresponds 
to one of the elevational study collection areas (fig. 1). Six of the stands fall within 
the low-elevation zone of the applied program (below 1,000 m) and four within the high 
zone (above 1,250 m). 


The seedlings were started and grown for one season in a greenhouse in 5x5x15 cm 
tar paper plant bands in a soil, sand, peat moss mix. They were then transplanted, still 
in the plant bands, in the PREF nursery site. Eight seedlings of each of the 497 fami- 
lies were planted at random in each of 3 replicates. Spacing was 10xJ0 cm. The seed- 
lings were given routine nursery care. They were inoculated with spores of the white 
pine blister rust fungus (Cronartium rtbicola) at age 3 and measured at age 4, before 
the disease had any noticeable effect on growth. 


Other seedlings from the same families have been outplanted to a field test site 
but have not been measured yet. 


4. Factortal mating destgn study.--This is another test that can serve both blis- 
ter rust resistance breeding and growth analysis. Three factorial mating designs, one 
each for the low-, mid-, and high-elevation zones, were established. Four trees were 
used as pollen parents and approximately 40 trees were used as seed parents in each zone. 
However, the majority of the seedlings in the test plantation represent only 40 families 
from each zone (4 pollen parents x 10 seed parents). 


The seedlings were grown for 6 years in replicated row plots at the Moscow nursery. 
They were inoculated for studying white pine blister rust resistance. No growth measure- 
ments were taken in the nursery. 


The survivors from the blister rust testing were outplanted to a low (750 m), 
nearly flat site at PREF in 1971. A variable number (average 15) of seedlings per 


family were planted as single tree plots at random throughout the plantation. Growth 
during the 3-year period from 1973 to 1975 and height in 1976 have been measured. 


5.  Vtgor-quality study.--This is the oldest of the five studies. It was started 
during the early stages of the program to produce blister rust resistant western white 
pine (Squillace and Bingham 1954). Excess seed from the program was used for this study 
to investigate the heritability of growth and quality traits. The parents of many of 
the seedlings grow in the Crystal Creek drainage near Fernwood, Idaho, at an elevation 
of about 870 m (fig. 1). A few others grow at three additional low sites within 45 km. 
Four candidates from the White Rock area at an elevation of 1,525 m near Clarkia, Idaho, 
were also included. Squillace and Bingham's (1958) report of "localized ecotypic varia- 
tion in western white pine'' was based on other seedlings of many of these same families. 


Seedlings (2-1) for the 1955 outplantings were grown in a nursery in Missoula, Mont. 
All the others were grown in Spokane, Wash. The seedlings were not measured in the 
nurseries. 


Three plantations were installed during the years from 1955 through 1959. Data 
from the 1955, 1956, and 1957 plantings at PREF and Deception Creek Experimental Forest 
(DCEF) are included in this report. The PREF plantation is located on a moderate (10- 
25 percent) north to northwest-facing slope at an elevation of 790 m. The DCEF planta- 
tion is on a steep (30-50 percent) north-facing slope at 1,110 m (fig. 1). Seedlings 
(mostly 2-1 transplants) were planted at a spacing of 2.4 m in 8-tree row plots in three 
replications at each site. Competition from native vegetation has been reduced by weed- 
ing and brush cutting at irregular intervals. The trees have been measured several 
times--most recently when all had been in the field for 16 years. 


RESULTS 


Elevational study.--The most striking feature of the nursery results is the general 
lack of patterns in the variation observed (table 1). Although the amount of variation 
present was large, much of it was related to differences among the offspring of a single 
tree or among the trees within a stand. This may be seen in the proportion of variance 
attributable to the various sources and the common significance of the "'trees within 
Stands' mean squares (table 2 and Appendix table 15). Because of the magnitude of the 
within-stand variation, the differences among stands, elevational zones, or geographic 
areas were seldom statistically significant. 


Seed weight did not differ significantly from one area to another and only within 
the Clearwater drainage were there significant differences among elevational zones. 
There, seed from the higher elevation trees was lighter than that from the lower trees, 
with a rather consistent gradation between. 


Seeds from the Trestle Creek area germinated sooner than those from other areas, 
but there was no pattern to the variation within areas. Whether the germination dif- 
ferences are inherent or were related to cone collection time or subsequent handling is 
unknown. Time of germination was closely related to first-year seedling height and 
some of the effect was still detectable at the end of the third year. All data for 
seedlings germinating more than 21 days after the start of germination were excluded 
from these and the following analyses. 


19 


UU 


yqsueT : jos : 3Sanq 


9 P9eN 


£°8 


Sie 


0°8 


gS hod 


pnd 


Gia?) 


ST 


oO 
~»m 


woman ON 


MMANMMN 


mM 


87°C 


Shvg 


pnd 


“OL6T “7% ABW 109RZe SAL, 

“OL61 ‘LZ [ttdy t0eqze sked. 

‘sooudteFFIp Yystoy Teak YSATJF LOF poysn(pe yYstoy redk PITUL, 
“YAMoIs seule, apn{oUT JOU S90q, 


*SJO9jFJO OWT] UOCTJLUTWIOS puv ZYBTOM pads OFZ paqsn[pe aYySstoy read 4saty, 


------- - - sdegawiz7IW - - - ---- - - ee ere 


61 Sie col 761 
61 ages vot 68T 
07 Sig 661 L0Z2 
8I 0°8 SLT 991 
02 6°2 SIZ STZ 
61 1°8 122 Gine 
02 (7 602 GUG 
02 [Bree STZ (AE 
02 6°L Sil SEE 
07~ (7 12 AGE 
OZ G4 612 122 
OZ 1°8 712 £77 
OZ I} LIZ $72 
0Z2 Gi viz ve? 
61 6°L 912 L7Z 
02 Chae vIZ LIZ 
61 als GG 661 
8I Qe 0272 S61 
8I Sa £02 781 
61 Shas 912 902 
02 OTe pol pst 
02 1'8 SIZ Gi 
OZ [Bode SIZ £02 
02 L’L £02 S61 
: Yyqsuet ON): tUsToy :4ystoy 
: uOpatT :uopeyT: seek pig : AeaK 
: -AqO9 :-A}09: poysn(py : pag 


ST 


6T 
6l 
OT 
él 
SI 
cl 
Gil 


YBTOY 
Ipod 


PU? 


"8961 ‘Og ABW JOIFe Skvq, 


99 8¢ 8¢ ct Se x 
£9 Le LE £T 6°LT ara 
Ws OV Ov cl LOE S90T 
a) 8s 9¢ OT 6 °9T S16 nsx TUey 
SL Sv Sv OT vst 2s 
OL £v Iv cl O°8T ara 
OL ov OV OT C81 S90T 
08 oP 8b 6 0°6T ST6 90f "3S 
08 Sv Lv 6 SEN x 
OL cv by OT 8°8T S8ST 
9L vv Sv 6 8° LT OOvT 
18 OV 8b 8 O°8T O@cT 
LL bp OV 6 LEN. S9OT 
L8 ov IS 9 col S16 
18 Sv 8Y 8 vst O9L 
8Z bv Sv OT 9°8T 0v9 aT S91] 
L9 £v OV £1 ‘8st x 
09 Tv vs Si Sil S8ST 
19 cv 9¢ £T 0°61 OLET 
89 £v Iv cl TAL aren 
89 7 OV vi 8°8T S9OT 
SL St cv £1 GiGi! ST6 
89 OV 6¢ vt L461 O92 
L9 Iv IV vt SUC SSp = LO JEMIBOTO 
, Shed Bu $102 AW 
> aystoy :,3ySToy : qystoy : owrz : BYsTOM: UOT. : pole 
g qeoak :reak YST : aeak +: uotTjJeu: psesg : -eADTY : UOTIOAETTOS 
g puz :peasn{py : 4st > -BUTUIIO: : : pes 


Dipp fidasanu fipnzs 70u0140Ae7q--"*T 9TqeL 


Table 2.--Percentages of total vartatton attributable to vartous sources for several seedling traits in the elevattonal 


study nursery test 


Traits 
Source Degrees :Germi-: lst :Adjusted: 2nd 2nd 3rd : Adjusted : Coty- : Coty- 
of of : Seed :nation: year :lst year: year year year 3rd year :Needle ledon ledon 
variation freedom :weight: time : height: height!: height:lammas: height: height? :length No. length 


vartatton 


Percent of tota 


Trestle Creek vs. 


Replications? 3 5.4 2.9 0.6 2.8 2.9 4.4 Ose) 4.0 0 (0) 
Areas 1 0 24.4**4* 18. 6** Deals SOMA WGA MONG A (0) ily |* BED AIS 7 
Elevation zones 

within area 13 NZ. 6) eal 225) 0 eal 2.0 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.7 3 
Stands within 

elevation & area 18 0 So 8) 1.6 Zeal Ball Soe Bas Bs oer 0.6 0) 0. 
Trees within stand, 

elev., & area 130 87.4 DAO CA ey Arak ORS Se ORs aOR zis 2.4* SiS in Issaausese AL7/ 
Experimental error® 471 12.4 9.3 16.9 22 30.9 23.4 26.1 24.5 4.2 Wal 
Within plot® 28.6 41.0 63.9 41.8 48.2 47.5 66.5 63.5 Voll 62 

Clearwater, St. Joe, Trestle and Kaniksu but only 915 m, 1065 m, and 1220 m Elevation Zones 

Replications? 3 Sad 1.9 0.4 Zea5) 4.5 25, ley 4.8 0.1 Le 
Areas 3 0 Why Pett = ANA) Stes 1.9 HORSIX Seo Sr 0) aS OR 2 0 
Elevation zones 

within area 8 0 0.6 Dir 0 3.4 2is5 Si5) od 0 1.0 (0) 
Stands within 

elevation §& area 11 8) 0) 0) So/ LS 2.0 Pas) 2:14'* Soc 4.8* 6. 
Trees within stand, 

elev., §& area 92 98.2 ZOO R ee ZO MOR meplifio ee DNA Boek iskoxs S09 sa Ws ss AAI 
Experimental error® 334 21.6 10.3 ikea 14.3 30.5 22.0 20.4 ONGd 5.3 9. 
Within plot® 32.0 44.2 64.8 46.6 53.6 50.8 68.4 64.1 72.9 60. 


TPirst year height adjusted for seed weight and germination time effects. 

*Third year height adjusted for first year height differences. 

30nly 2 replicates were used for cotyledon number and length analyses so degrees of 
error were adjusted accordingly. 

* and ** indicate significance at the 5 percent or 1 percent level, respectively. 
variance see Appendix Table 15. 

°Inciudes all interaction terms involving replication. 

®Pooled estimate from 30 to 50 plots with 5 to 10 seedlings per plot. 


Clearwater--All Elevation Zones from 455 m to 1585 m 


S* 


.5** 


freedom for replicate and 


For detailed analyses of 


When the raw data for the first-year height were analyzed, the mean squares 
associated with areas were highly significant. This was true for both comparisons, 
for example, between Clearwater and Trestle where the broadest elevational range was 
sampled, and among all areas but utilizing only the 915 m, 1,065 m, and 1,220 m eleva- 
tion zones (those common to all areas). The early germinating Trestle seedlings were 
taller than the later germinating seedlings from the Clearwater and Kaniksu areas. 
However, when first-year heights were adjusted for seed weight and germination time 
the variability related to areas was much reduced. The comparison of all areas using 
the middle elévational zones showed no significant differences, but the Trestle Creek 
and Clearwater areas differed at the 5 percent level when all elevation zones were 
considered. These adjusted means differed by only 2 mm--approximately 4.5 percent of 
the mean. 


Subsequent height measurements taken in the second and third years followed a pat- 
tern similar to first-year height. Analyses of the raw data showed significant differ- 
ences among trees within stands and among areas. There were few or no significant dif- 
ferences among elevations within areas or stands within elevations. When the data were 
adjusted to take into account first-year height differences, second- and third-year 
height differences among areas were not significant. In other words, the Trestle Creek 
seedlings, which germinated early and were tallest at age 1, were still tallest at age 3 
but relative to their height at age 1 they had not grown as much as seedlings from the 
Clearwater and Kaniksu areas. 


Whether such adjustments should be made depends on the cause of the germination 
time difference. If it is the result of genetic differences, no adjustment should be 
made. If the difference resulted from cone collecting or seed processing timing or 
techniques, then the adjustments would be appropriate. In the absence of information 
to indicate genetic differentiation of germination time, I favor use of the adjusted 
data. 


If the range of 120- to 180-m elevational zones is combined across areas to form 
three broader zones called low, mid, and high (<1,000 m, 1,000-1,250 m, >1,250 m) like 
the classification in the following studies, then seedlings of the low zone were tallest 
and those of high zone were shortest. At age 3, heights by zone were: low - 220 m, 

mid - 211 mm, high - 207 mm. These means did not differ significantly. 


Secondary leaf }ength (mature third-year leaves) was the only other trait in which 
differences among areas were significant. Within the Trestle Creek and Clearwater 
areas, differences between trees within stands were significant but for the other areas 
they were not. Stand-to-stand differences within an elevational zone were sometimes 
large but seemed to occur at random. Significant cotyledon differences--number and 
length--were confined to trees within stands and stands within elevational zones. 


Bud burst at the start of the third year did not differ significantly among stands, 
elevations, or areas (table 3). The highest elevation source from Trestle Creek was 
the first to break bud but the next to highest source was last. All buds broke within 
a 2-week period and most within a 5-day period. The newly emerging leaves were rapidly 
separated and in from 10 to 14 days the tip of the new bud was distinguishable. At 
that time the seedlings were classified as having set buds even though stem elongation 
and external bud development continued for nearly a month. No significant differences 
in bud set time were observed except among trees within stands. 


The seedlings were 7 years old and had been in the field plots for 4 years when 
they were last measured. Overall survival of seedlings of Clearwater origin was about 
10 percent less than that of Trestle seedlings with the differences greatest at the 
Canyon series of test sites. However, survival differences so far do not clearly indi- 
cate differences related to area or elevation of origin or their interactions with test 
site conditions. Average height ranged from 54 cm at the best site, low PREF, to 34 cm 
at the poorest, high PREF (table 4). 


Table 3.--Analyses of vartance and percent of total variance for third-year bud burst 
and bud set in the elevational study nursery test 


Bud burst : Bud set 
: ; Mean PNG Oie TCoOcel 3 ween Te oLatotall 
Area : Source qide square ec) vwanialtaon : Square : variation 

Trestle Replications 3 OSral 28 163.5 3.4 
Creek 
(640 to Elevation 6 26.4 OG LOE 12 
1585 m plots) 

Plots within 

elevations 7 20.8 0.9 48.0 0 
Trees within plots 
within elevations 28 12.1 0 52. G36 8.1 

Experimental error! 84 16.8 29.6 20.9 4.9 

Within plot 672 Soe 66.1 Gall 82.4 
1220 m plots Replications 3 14.2 Deal 104.4 555 
from Clear- 
WENEEIOS (Sed Areas 4 Sod Hoes 104.0 2.9 
Joe, Trestle 
Creek, Trees within areas 10 Woe 6.3 Og Pe aS) 
Kaniksu 

Experimental error! 42 6.5 9.0 20.2 5.0 

Within plots 240 Aves 74.8 NS sal 74.6 


lTIncludes all interaction terms involving replication. 
2x and ** indicate significance at the 5 percent and 1 percent level, respectively. 


At the individual test sites the results of the analyses of total height are very 
similar to those from the nursery trial (table 5S presents the results for only the most 
variable series of sites, i.e., PREF). Most of the variability is related to differences 
among the families representing individual trees within stands. The variability within 
plots (i.e., among seedlings of the same family) is also large--nearly equaling that 
among plots (experimental error). This result indicates that within-family variation 
is large or microsite differences exert strong influences or that both are important 
contributors. The variation related to area of seed origin or to elevational zones 
within areas was very small in comparison and usually not significant. 


The Trestle Creek seedlings were taller than those from the Clearwater at the low 
and high sites at both PREF and Canyon, but the Clearwater seedlings were as tall or 
taller at the mid-elevation sites. No pattern could be seen in the variation in height 
among seedlings related to the various elevational zones within areas. Neither was 
there any correspondence between elevational zones in the different areas. For example, 
seedlings from the highest Clearwater collections grew well at most test sites but those 
from the highest Trestle Creek collection grew poorly. As a group, the seedlings from 


Xe) 


Table 4.--Height of seedlings at age 7 in the elevational study field tests 


Seed collection : Test region and site 

Canyon! PREF2 ‘Overall 

Area : Elevation : Low : Mid : High : x : Low: Mid :High : x Ree 
MOLT So Centimeters = = = ===> => = ===: 

Clearwater 760 Sy, 40 38 38 55 39 30 43 41 

915 42 40 37 40 53 38 34 42 41 

1065 57] 4] 515 Si 51 35 32 40 38 

1220 41 41 35 39 50 36 55) 40 40 

1370 40 43 35 40 53 34 32 41 41 

1585 44 43 38 42 54 36 34 43 42 

x 40 42 36 39 53 S57/ 35 41 40 

Trestle 760 42 42 36 40 53 Sy 35 42 41 

915 40 42 42 41 5S 35 34 41 41 

1065 45 41 38 41 Si/ 36 36 44 43 

1220 39 41 35 39 55 39 35 44 42 

1400 42 40 37 40 56 $5 34 43 41 

1585 39 39 37 38 4 Si) 34 42 40 

xX 41 4] 38 40 55 37 35 42 41 

Overall x 41 4] 37 40 54 37 34 42 41 


lCanyon Ranger District: low = 900 m, mid = 1,200 m, high = 1,500 m. 
*Priest River Experimental Forest: low = 800 m, mid = 1,100 m, high = 1,400 m. 


Table 5.--Analyses of variance and percent of total vartatton for hetght of 7-year-old 
seedlings itn the elevattonal study sites at PREF 


Low site : Mid site : High site 
0 me 


Source : Ghgate : Mean : % of total : Mean % of total : Mean : % of total 
: :square: variation :square: variation :square: variation 


Replicates 4 134 0.0 114 0.0 269 0.4 
Area 1 1,013*! 0.8 5 0.0 793% WO 
Elevation 

within Area 10 255 0.0 155 0.4 68 0.0 
Rep * Area 

G. Eley) (Exon 21) 44 240 2.4 Si 6.0 192 6.4 
Trees within 

Elev § Area 47 BO 6.6 140** Holl 220 8.2 
Repey aree 

(Exro7 92) 170 Wes, S38) 79 SoZ 95 2.4 
Within Plot 565 149 84.9 70 81.3 88 81.6 


lx and ** indicate significance at the 5 percent and 1 percent levels, 
respectively. 


10 


the 760 m Clearwater collection grew poorly at the low- and mid-elevation sites at Canyon 
but well at the high site. In contrast, at PREF they grew well at the low- and mid- 
elevation sites but poorly at the high site. However, these fluctuations are rather 
small--only 2 or 3 cm (5S percent) above or below the site mean--and, so far at least, 
appear more accidental than the result of specific tree-site interactions. 


When the overall variability across sites within test regions was analyzed (table 6), 
the variation associated with trees within elevational zones was still predominant over 
that for elevational zones or areas. The site x tree interaction effect was significant 
at PREF. When the tree mean squares were tested against this interaction term rather 
than the error mean squares, the tree effects were significant at only the 5 to 10 
percent level. 


The average height of the seedlings over the three sites at PREF was essentially 
the same as that for the Canyon sites but the range at PREF was much greater. Neither 
group of sites shows a typical spread of conditions for the area. At PREF, growth and 
survival at the mid-elevation site has been reduced due to poor site quality and resid- 
ual competition resulting from site preparation problems. At Canyon, the low site 
trees suffered from similar site preparation problems. 


Table 6.--Analyses of vartance and percent of total variation for hetght of 7-year-old 


seedlings of the elevational study combined over sttes at Canyon and PREF 


Canyon : PREF 
Meantem iotmtotale i aMean:) sof Ttotal 
Source : Gl site : square: variation :square: variation 
Test sites! 2 3,829 4.9 106, 038 SDP 
Replicates within sites 2 302 sil 72 0 
Area 1 W27/ 0 493 0 
Site * Area 2 Wag 0 658 0.4 
Elevation within Area 10 290 OZ 278 0 
Seen ELevation 20 168 0 101 0 
RepramAweaG Elev, (Error, 1) NZ 149 DS 188 250, 
Trees within Elevations 
and Areas 48 DADE 1.9 283 Os 
SES FSS 94 142 Drool DN 28 
REO ~ eee ((lsieie@ie 2) 500 111 0 119 Wes) 
Within Plot 116 87.0 109 40.4 


lhLow, mid, and high elevation. 


2* and ** indicate significance at the 5 percent and 1 percent level, 


respectively. 


At Canyon d.f. = 1,001, at PREF dof. 


1] 


1,694. 


In the Ida Creek plantation adjacent to the low PREF plot, where all the families 
included in the nursery test were planted, area differences were significant at age 4 
but became less important and nonsignificant by age 6. Actually, the difference between 
area means remained nearly constant (2 cm between Clearwater and Trestle Creek), but as 
a percentage of total height that difference dropped from 7 percent at age 4 to only 
2 percent by age 8. 


When all the families were grouped as to low, mid, or high origin, as with the 
nursery data, then height at age 8 decreased from low to high elevation (101, 100, and 
98 cm, respectively). These differences were not significant and that result is con- 
trary to the findings in the adjacent low plot where the high-elevation seedlings were 
slightly taller than the low- and mid-elevation seedlings. 


Elevation-aspect study.--Height at the end of the third year in the nursery 
(table 7) did not differ significantly among drainages, elevations, aspects, or pollen 
types. Rehfeldt (in press) also found that at age 6 differences among drainages, eleva- 
tions, or aspects were not significant when tested by individual control-pollinated 
families within plots. Seedlings from south aspect plots in this study were generally 
taller than those from north aspect plots in the same drainage and at the same elevation. 
This was also the result for the Gold Center Creek drainage in Rehfeldt's study, but 
seedlings from north and south aspect Marble Creek plots were essentially equal in height. 


Table 7.--Third year hetght of seedlings in the elevation-aspect study 


Seed parent location : Pollen source 
: : Marble Creek 
Elevation : > north aspect 
Drainage : zone! : Aspect : Low Mid High =: Local, <a) gx. 3 Seabees 


------ Hetght (millimeters) - - - - - - 


Gold Center Low North Wal Vall US 64 70 75 
Creek South 67 84 80 87 79 
Mid North 75 73 83 -- 80 83 78 
South 76 69 87 108 85 
High North WS 85 65 72 74 76 
South Wil 73 84 84 78 
Marble Low North -- -- 88 85 86 85 
Creek South 84 87 V7 87 84 
Mid North 74 eo 75 79 76 78 81 
South 84 78 74 84 80 
High North -- -- -- 75 75 78 
South 64 84 87 84 80 
5d a 7380 83 
x x 
fs 79 N 76 
M 80 S 8l 
H 78 


ILow = 950 m, mid = 1,175 m, high = 1,400 m. 


Overall, the seedlings produced by local pollen were taller than those produced 
with pollen from the north aspect plots but the differences were not significant. For 
the south aspect plots, local pollens produced seedlings significantly taller than those 
produced by the north aspect pollens. On the north aspect plots, pollen from one of the 
other north plots usualiy produced taller seedlings than did local pollen. 


Among the north aspect Marble Creek plots, seedlings from the low plot were tallest 
but pollen from the plot produced the shortest seedlings when used on trees in other 
plots. For the high plot, the results were the opposite (seedlings from the plot trees 
were short but pollen from the plot produced tall seedlings when used elsewhere). Such 
reversals were probably the result of large amounts of within-plot variability coupled 
with the small numbers of trees chosen to be pollen or seed parents in any one plot 
rather than resulting from plot interactions. 


Natural selection study.--In this study only growth during the fourth growing season 
was measured and analyzed (tables 8 and 9). The mean growth of the 4 high-elevation 
stands was significantly less than that of the 6 low-elevation stands (10.8 cm vs. 

11.8 cm). However, the best high-elevation stands grew more than the poorest low- 
elevation stand. Among the 6 low-elevation stands, the 4 fastest growing ones differed 
significantly from the slowest growing one. 


Even though the differences between elevational groups and among stands were signif- 
icant, the bulk of the genetic variation (61 percent) was associated with differences 
among trees within stands. Of the remaining genetic variation, 28 percent was due to 
elevational differences and 11 percent to differences between stands within elevational 
zones. Overall, 62 percent of the variation was related to variation among seedlings 
from the same tree, 2 percent to block interactions, and 36 percent to genetic variation. 


Table 8.--Fourth year height growth of seedlings tn the natural selection study 


Number of 


: Elevational : : Range of : families 
Stand : zone! : Growth : family means : in top 10% 
- - - - Centimeters - - - - - 

Beaver Creek pole Low eayaa 8.8-15.4 12 
Crystal Creek Low N52 9.3-14.9 9 
Beaver Creek mature Low Ao, &\ 8.3-16.1 12 
Montford Creek Low FOF alb 9.4-15.2 7 
Fighting Creek Low 11.7 abc 9.3-16.4 53 
Rescue Creek High 14) bed 8.2-14.8 3 
Bertha Hill High Iota cd 7.8-14.7 1 
Elk Creek Low 10.9 cd 85 2=15 57 1 
Boulder Creek High HO Siaca 8.0-14.9 2 
White Rock High 10.6 d PeSoN GeO 0) 


lLow = below 1,000 m, high = above 1,250 m. 
Means not having a letter in common differ at the 5 percent level of significance. 


13 


Table 9.--Analysts of fourth year hetght growth of seedlings in the natural selection 


study 
Percentage 
: : : Variance : of total 

Source 5 Glaiee : Sao a= WIbS> : F : component : variance 
Block 2 622 Sill 0.09 0.005 
Stand 9 3260 362 7.9%! JOS) .02 

Elevation 1 1728 22 9. 0* .24 .014 

Stand (Elev) 8 1538 192 AO mull . 006 
Block*Stand 18 825 46 6 dil . 006 
Tree (Stand) 487 15468 32 Dro 495 . 06 
Block* 

Tree(Stand) 969 14727 WS .00 .00 
Within family 7054 108648 5 15.40 Sil 


l* and ** indicate Significance at the 5 percent or 1 percent level, respectively. 


Factortal mating destgn study.--Seedlings from crosses among mid-elevation (1,000- 
1,250 m) trees grew the most between ages 8 and 11 and were tallest at age 12 (table 10). 
As a group they differed significantly from both the low- and high-elevation families in 
growth and from the high-elevation families in height (table 11). The low- and high- 
elevation means did not differ significantly. 


Approximately 90 percent of the total variability was associated with differences 
among seedlings within families and environmental effects. Of the remainder, 67 percent 
of the variability in growth and 80 percent of the variability in height was associated 
with differences among families within elevation zones and only 33 percent or 20 percent 
associated with differences among elevation zones. 


Although the mid-elevation group was tallest as a whole, the tallest family was 
from the low-elevation group. The low group also had a higher ratio of better families 
than either the mid- or high-elevation groups (1/5 vs. 1/8 and 1/36 families in the top 
10 percent, respectively). 


Table 10.--Growth and hetght of seedlings tn the factorial mating destgn study 


Elevational : Growth between : Height 
zone! : ages 9 and 11 : age 12 
--------- Centimeters - - ----- - 
Low 44 101 
Mid 48 106 
High 45 99 


lLow = below 1,000 m, mid = 1,000 to 1,250 m, high = above 1,250 m. 


14 


Table 11.--Analysts of growth and hetght in the factorial mating design study 


Variance 
: : : Percentage 
Source : Gl538 : M.S. : Value : of “totall 
Growth between ages 9 and 11 
Elevational zone 2 2206**! 4.3 iy 
Family (Elev. ) 95 ASD 8.6 56 Hf 
Within Family 1382 301 301.4 95.29 


Height age 12 


Elevational zone yD. PIMOS 14.8 1.9 
Family (Elev. ) 95 GDI 59.9 LO 
Within Family 1382 716 GAS 7 90.5 


1* and ** indicate Significance at the 5 percent and 1 percent level, 
respectively. 


Vigor-quality study.--The main reasons for including this study are that the trees 
are old enough to have reached a stable growth pattern and to show how the results have 
changed over the years. The mean height of the low elevation families has been consis- 
tently greater than that of the high elevation families (table 12). Significant dif- 
ferences during the early years, ages 4 to 8 (table 13), probably resulted from the 
combination of a carryover of nursery differences (Squillace and Bingham 1958) and 
limited competition on the recently cleared sites. By age 8 competition from the native 
vegetation was increasing and until age 12 or 14 when most trees were taller than the 
brush all families probably grew less than their potential. That competition probably 
was also responsible for keeping the differences between elevational zones relatively 
constant while between-family and within-plot variation increased more rapidly. After 
the trees overtopped the brush, their growth potential could be realized more fully. 
Then height and growth rate differences between the low and high zones again became 
Significant. 


During the last 3 years, differences between the low and high families continued to 
increase but at a slower rate. At the same time, differences among families within 
elevational zones became larger, resulting in a decrease in the significance of the 
elevational difference. The elevational difference exhibited in this study is probably 
larger than would be found if more stands, and trees, had been sampled. The results from 
the natural selection study reported earlier indicate that trees of the high elevation 
stand (White Rock) used in this study produce the slowest growing seedlings of the high 
elevation stands sampled. Also, most of the low elevation trees are from a stand (Crystal 
Creek) that produces some of the fastest growing seedlings. Thus, by chance, these 
results and those of Squillace and Bingham (1958) contrast the poorest high trees we have 
Studied with some of the best low trees. Even then, the best high family has been taller 
than several of the low families. 


Height growth of the young trees at the two sites was essentially equal until age 
10 and did not differ significantly until age 16. Interactions between sites and eleva- 
tional origin of the seedlings were essentially nonexistent even after the height dif- 
ference between the sites became highly significant. 


15 


Table 12.--Hetght and growth of young trees tn the vigor-quality study at vartous ages 


Height DCEF PREF Combined 
at : Low High Low High Low High 
age elevation:elevation elevation:elevation elevation:elevation 
families!: families? families: families families: families 
----------------- Meters --------------- 
A ae 0.11 0.09 Oeil 0.09 0.11 0.09 
Range 0.08-0.15 0.09-0.10 0.08-0.13 0.05-0.13 
Qo se 0.61 0.56 0.62 0.51 0.62 0.54 
Range 0.51-0.72 0.46-0.62 Oe4AnsSOo72l Wo SlsO Se 
10” 0.97 0.91 0.94 0.85 0.95 0.88 
Range 0276=0. 12 0576-1200 0.67-1.10 0.58-1.00 
12) ae 1.6 1.5 LBS 1.6 a) 16 
Range WS B=11© Ie Saal, 7 Wess,0) dene ss 
AP Ded Dis 2.9 Des 5 DG 2.4 
Range 2.0-3.0 2.0-2.5 Ze Shel Lo MaZn T 
WG Se 3.5 B50) Ave! 3.6 BiB o 553 
Range 3.0-4.1 2.8-3.3 Seana 2.8-4.1 
197 xX 5.4 AT, 6.3 5.8 5.9 522 
Range 4.6-6.1 4.0-5.1 5.2-6.8 4.7-6.5 
Growth 
between 
ages 
--------------- Meters/year - - ------------- 
12 & 
16 x 0.47 0.38 0.58 0.50 0.52 0.44 
Range 0.38-0.53 0.32-0.42 0.51-0.60 0.42-0.57 
ORG ae 
19 x 0.63 0.56 575 0.75 0.69 0.64 
Range 0.57-0.69 0.46-0.61 0.60-0.85 0.68-0.79 


laverage elevation 925 m. 
2average elevation 1,525 m. 


16 


Table 13.--Analysts of the effect of elevation of seed origin and test stte on height 
and growth of trees in the vigor-qualtty study 


Test site and source of variation 


DCEF : PREF : Combined 
Trait : Elevation : Elevation . Test : Elevation: Gaiteux 
measured : zone! : zone! : site? : zone! __:elevation? 
Height at age: ' 
4 Oo SO? eV <l Pel? <l 
8 9S 4.84* <] Oia 1.86 
10 <l 1.48 <1 2.06 ela 
12 1.96 BESS) SS 3.46 <] 
14 4.12 Opaliox Wo ita! 8.84* <All 
16 So sie To OS hee Sie SA <] 
19 8S. 4.98 Ska NORE <] 
Growth between 
ages: 
IZ & kG WiOne Nabe Aes Sona SOMOLA <l 
16 & 19 5.04* <] WO ows 4.04 <1 


Elevation zone mean square 


inp value resulting from the comparison ———————————__———————— 
Trees within elevation zone mean square 


Test site mean square 


2"Et™ value resulting from the comparison ———————__+——______ 
Rep within site mean square 


Site X elevation mean square 


3"P" value resulting from the comparison 
8 P Rep within site X elevation mean square ~ 


** and ** indicate significance at the 5 percent and 1 percent level, respectively. 


Although the differences among families within elevational zones were large (the 
range between tallest and shortest varied from 10 percent to 35 percent of the mean at 
different ages), the differences were seldom significant because of the small numbers 
of families tested and large amounts of within-family variability. The variance attrib- 
utable to family-by-site interactions was small and nonsignificant except at age 8. 

The question of family-by-site interactions is even more confusing if one also includes 
year of planting. A few families were planted in each of 2 or 3 years. For some of 
these families the seedlings planted in 1955 may have grown faster at PREF than DCEF 
but those planted in 1957 grew faster at DCEF or vice versa. 


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 


To date all of our studies with western white pine indicate that the majority of 
the variation which might be utilized in a tree improvement program is related to the 
differences among individual trees within stands rather than to differences among stands, 
elevational zones, or geographic areas. When stand or area differences were significant, 
there did not appear to be a pattern to the variation. In most of the tests, seedlings 
from high elevation parent trees (generally 1,375 m or above) grew slower than those 
from lower elevation parents. The differences were significant in only about half of 
the tests and the average growth of seedlings from some high stands was good. However, 


W/, 


if one were selecting only those families that were in the top 10 percent group for 
height in any one test, very few of the high-elevation families would be selected 
(table 14). Among the lower elevation zones there again appeared to be no pattern to 
the variation. 


The general finding from these studies that seedlings from high elevation trees are 
slower growing than those from lower trees agrees with the results reported earlier by 
Squillace and Bingham (1958). However, these data do not agree with their findings that 
high-elevation families grew slower than low-elevation families in a low nursery and low 
plots but faster at a high plot. In the vigor-quality study, low-elevation families were 
Significantly taller than high-elevation families at both low- and mid-test sites. While 
the differences in sites were not as great as in Squillace and Bingham's study, the site 
means did differ significantly and there was no indication of the high-elevation families 
growing faster at the higher site. In fact, the difference between low- and high-eleva- 
tion families was greater at the higher site even though total height was less. Simi- 
larly, as mentioned above, in the elevational study high-elevation families were as tall 
or slightly taller than low- or mid-elevation families at the low sites but slightly 
shorter at the high sites. Thus, up to this time the results of the present studies 


suggest that groups of families representing various elevational. zones perform nearly 
the same whether tested at low-, mid-, or high-elevation sites. 


Table 14.--Ratio of trees tn top 10 percent group in vartous studies 


Study : Seed collection elevational zone 
Low : Mid i High 
Elevational 
Nursery 5/7 Iya 1/39 
Ida Creek WT 1/10 L/SS 
PREF 
Low site 1/20 e/a LALO 
Mid site 1/4 0 Wf 2O 
High site 1/20 Wd 1/10 
x 1/9 1/10 Wale 
Canyon 
Low site 0 1/10 YS 
Mid site 1/20 1/20 1/5 
High site 1/5 0 1/6 
x LPl2 1/20 1/6 
Natural selection WW WP LY WSS 
Factorial mating design 1/5 1/8 1/36 
Overall La 1/10 1/26 


18 


Chance selection and sample size appear to contribute much to the conflicting 
results of the various studies. The vigor-quality study generally shows a marked con- 
trast between low- and high-elevation stands, but it mainly samples only two stands and 
only four trees in the high one. Subsequent results from the natural selection study 
where 50 trees were sampled per stand confirm the differences among the low and high 
stands represented in the vigor-quality study, but also show that other choices of single 
low and high stands could lead to the conclusion that low and high stands do not differ. 


On the other hand, the elevational study sampled a much broader range of stands but 
again with few trees per stand. Consequently, the lack of differences among low and high 
stands may be too conservative. For example, two 5-tree collections were obtained from 
a stand at Bertha Hill at 1,585 m in the Clearwater area for the elevational study. 
Seedlings from one of these collections were the tallest of the Clearwater collections 
but those from the other were about average. The mean height of the two was only 
slightly less than that for the best elevational zone. However, the results from the 
50-tree collection made for the natural selection study indicate that although seedlings 
from this stand are among the fastest growing of the high-elevation stands they are 
slower growing than those of five of the six low-elevation stands. Among the low- 
elevation stands in the natural selection study, even a 50-tree sample indicated only 
that seedlings of the poorest stand differed significantly from the best ones. 


The results of this group of studies also differ from those found in other western 
conifers. Callaham and Liddicoet (1961) found that mid-elevation ponderosa pine families 
were tallest at low-, mid-, and high-elevation sites during the first 20 years after 
outplanting. However, although the high-elevation trees were doing very poorly at the 
low- and mid-elevation sites at age 20, at the high site they were taller than the low 
trees and nearly as tall as the mid trees. This pattern continued through age 29 
(Conkle 1973). Conkle also found that the variance component related to elevation zones 
was much larger than that for families within zones at the low and mid sites but not at 
the high site. In our studies the family component was always much larger. 


In working with Douglas-fir, Rehfeldt (1974) found that differences between low, 
or warm, habitat type trees and high, or cool, habitat type trees could be detected with 
seedlings from as few as 7 trees per stand. He also found growth differences between 
stands on the east and west sides of the mountain ranges along the border between Idaho 
and Montana. 


In summary, the results from this series of tests indicate that, at least within 
the north Idaho portion of its interior range, western white pine has a different varia- 
tion pattern than that of most other conifers that have been intensively studied. 
Western white pine is highly variable, but most of the variation is related to differ- 
ences among the offspring of a single tree or among the trees in a stand. Although 
differences among stands, elevation zones, or geographic areas were sometimes signifi- 
cant, the proportion of the variance attributable to these sources was usually smaller 
than that for trees within stands. 


All of the seedlings involved in the studies reported here were started under pro- 
tected and irrigated nursery conditions. They escaped the variety of environmental 
conditions that might lead to ecotypic differentiation during the critical germination 
and early establishment growth phases often found when reproduction occurs naturally. 
Squillace and Bingham's (1958) germination test results may indicate such a differenti- 
ation, but the results reported here do not show ecotype formation for other traits. 


19 


APPLICATIONS 


The results to date indicate that only two seed zones are necessary for western 
white pine in north Idaho, and probably for the adjacent white pine areas in north- 
eastern Washington and northwestern Montana as well. The main, or low, zone would 
include all the area below 1,375 m, with the exception of the most severe sites where 
the upper boundary might be lowered to 1,250 m. The second, or high, zone would include 
all the area above 1,375 m and a limited area related to severe sites between 1,250 m 
ands lSy7- Same 


Two seed orchards, with selections related to the above seed zones, should be suf- 
ficient for the next phase of the blister rust resistance breeding program. Siblings, 
or vegetative propagules, of seedlings intended for either orchard should be tested at 
several sites to facilitate selection of those individuals or families that are both 
broadly adapted and fast growing. 


Seed from the present low- and mid-elevation orchards can be combined and used on 
low- and mid-elevation sites throughout north Idaho. It can probably be used at eleva- 
tions up to 1,375 m on most sites. Seed from the high orchard should be used for sites 
above 1,375 m.. This is a conservative approach, as our results so far show little or 
no difference in survival or growth among seedlings of low-, mid-, or high-elevation 
origin at the high sites. However, long-term effects have shown up in other species. 


PUBLICATIONS CITED 


BarnespaBie. Wie 
1967. Phenotypic variation associated with elevation in western white pine. For. Sci. 
13(4):357-364. 
Calilaham,; Ra Zon and AS Re haddvcoet: 
1961. Altitudinal variation at 20 years in ponderosa and Jeffrey pines. J. For. 
59(11):814-820. 
Conkle, M. T. 
1973. Growth data for 29 years from the California elevational transect study of 
ponderosa pine. For. Sci. 19(1):31-39. 
Rehfeldt, G. E. 
1974. Genetic variation of Douglas-fir in the Northern Rocky Mountains. USDA For. 
Serv. Res. Note INT-184, 6 p. Intermt. For. and Range Exp. Stn., Ogden, Utah. 
Rehikeiidtay Gree 
[In press.] Ecotypic differentiation in populations of Pinus monttcola in north 
Idaho--myth or reality? Am. Nat. 
Rehkelidte (Gleb a wand ahead me soteaminostetee 
1970. Height growth in western white pine progenies. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note 
INT-123, 4 p. Intermt. For. and Range Exp. Stn., Ogden, Utah. 
Squillace, A. E., and R. T. Bingham. 
1954. Breeding for improved growth rate and timber quality in western white pine. 
Je Eon. 152)(9) 2656-662 
Squillace, A. E., and R. T. Bingham. 
1958. Localized ecotypic variation in western white pine. For. Sci. 4(1):20-34. 


Townsend, A. M., J. W. Hanover, and B. V. Barnes. 
1972. Altitudinal variation in photosynthesis, growth, and monoterpene composition of 
western white pine (Pinus montzcola Dougl.) seedlings. Silvae Genet. 21(3-4): 
133-139. 


20 


APPENDIX 


p9onpet oLOM LOIL9 


"AToATAIOdsSoAI STOANT YUSdIOd T TO auadtod s oY. Je DOUROT;FTUBTS OJeOTPUT yy Pue , 
‘jzoTd sod sdurp~poss QT 02 § yaItm sqotd Og 07 O¢ wWorz OJEeUITISO petoods 
“UOT IeOT[ dat BUTATOAUL SW9} UOTJOETOQUT [[P SOpN[IU]< 


*A[BuTpLoO99e 


pue sojeot{det 10} Wopesrz FO Saoisap Os “YyASUdT pue Loqunu uopdal[Ajoo Jo sask{eue IOF pasn otom saqeottdaa omy ATUO,, 
“SadueLasFIp YYystTOY Av9Xk-ySAty 10F poysn(pe .ystoy IPdk-PITY Le 
‘reok puodes UT YIMOLS SBME, OpnNTIUT OU so0q, 


*sq00FJO OWT} UOTJeUTUIES pur JYSTOM poos OF poysn(pe Yystey Ieok-ySITY_ 


6°0 1°0 OT 6oT vl 9 61 9 ZL G gt01d UuTUITM 
Oma: 10 6¢ ILv Ov9 ve S9 vt 6T OT poe g 70449 Tequeutsedxq 
¥¥9 DV xxD°0 LV *%CCL **898 ‘T ¥9V xx Lb% **99 «xSS1 ¥¥ SS 82 76 seole 8 
“*qaTa “Spurs UTYIIM Sada] 
*£'6 *L°0 — xxSST «20ST $66 ‘2 8 Lev SII pel 14 Is II svote } “AOTS UTYITM SpurysS 
2°9 8°0 97I L06‘¢ O8T‘9 99T £98 vl C92 99 SZ 8 Seote UTYFIM SQUOZ UOTIBADTA 
£°8 6°0 x68 OLT 665 “02 109 *076 p8z xx£00°7  ¥¥989 LI ¢ svoly 
6°ST CHO 86L SSZ°Z £76‘9 67S 9v0‘T 6S p82 vst ¢ ,SuoTzeoT {doy 
SOUOZ UOTIBASTY W OZTZ‘T pue ‘wu sgQ‘T Sw ST6 ATUO 4nq nsyTuRyY pue ‘faT4Sor] ‘90f *3S ‘ataqeMIROT)D 
6°0 T‘0 OT 6£T Sol 9 61 9 cS Gi gt01d UTUITM 
all T°0 cv LLS LOL Be £9 8T 8T L [LV gtOLsL9 Tequowtsodxy 
wel D  xeb'O  xxTl ¥9EL *xSSL°T xx 8S xx 0S *¥09 xe LOT *x0S SLO °¢ Ost seore 8 
‘*AOTO *‘SpuezsS UTYITIM Soo 1], 
Sane: £°0 98 ¥x665 ‘T xO1TSS x8C1 OSS 06 Z8T 08 LST 8T seote }¥ ‘ABTA UTYITIM SpurzS 
¥0°6 S°0 6IT 69‘ T 62S°¢ S£Z 188 69 S7¢ SOT 818 £T seore UTYATM SQUOZ UOTIPADTY 
*9°7S eZ *60L IS9°T xxZ9Z°98 xxLLS°Z = exBEL°7Z ~~ x85 xxST6°L pxxT9S‘S 82 I seaty 
6°8 0°0 £68 L18‘9 O8Z‘LI STS S89‘ S6 619 56S 0 ¢ ,SuoT zest {doy 
WU S8S‘T 02 W SSp WoIZ SOUOZ UOTICADTY [1TV--1O}eMAvIT) “SA YooID OT}S9I], 
YyzsusT “ON =: YQdUsdT ¢ HUSTOY 2Y3 TOY seuuet: 2IYyYsToY {248 Toy :2ysToYy owt y 1ysToM: Bato) uoT}JeTIVA FO 9dINOS 
uOpds|{ UOPe, :9[PadN :4e9K PIS ieak Ieok Ivoak Iesk 4S] Ieak uotjeu poses 
-Aj09 3 ~4309 :peasnfpy pag puz_: puz__: peysn{py 3ST ~ TWL99 


S}Te1], 


7804 hiasanu fipnys 1DUu014pAe]a aYZ U2 841042 Burj,paes yoAeaes Uof eouv1ava fo sasfzoun ay. wouf saapnbs uvay--"ST eTGeL 


Die 


Steinhoff, R. J. 
1979. Variation in early growth of western white pine in north Idaho. 
USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. INT-222, 22 p. Intermt. For. and 
Range Exp. Stn., Ogden, Utah 84401. 


In several nursery and field tests most of the useable variation among 


western white pine seedlings or saplings was related to differences among 
the parent trees within stands. When differences among geographic areas, 
elevational zones, or stands within those categories were significant us- 
ually no pattern to the variation was apparent. However, seedlings from 
high elevation parents (generally 1,375 mor higher) were often shorter than 
those from lower elevations. 


KEYWORDS: geographic variation, elevational variation, Pinus monticola, 
seed zones 


Steinhoff, R. J. 
1979. Variation in early growth of western white pine in north Idaho. 
USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. INT-222, 22 p. Intermt. For. and 

Range Exp. Stn., Ogden, Utah 84401. 


In several nursery and field tests most of the useable variation among 
western white pine seedlings or saplings was related to differences among 
the parent trees within stands. When differences among geographic areas, 
elevational zones, or stands within those categories were significant us- 
ually no pattern to the variation was apparent. However, seedlings from 
high elevation parents (generally 1,375 mor higher) were often shorter than 
those from lower elevations. 


KEYWORDS: geographic variation, elevational variation, Pinus monticola, 
seed zones 


yx U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1979—677-019/92 REG. 8 


L LIBR: 


i 


102296617 


Headquarters for the Intermountain Forest and 
Range Experiment Station are in Ogden, Utah. 
Field programs and research work units are 
maintained in: 


Billings, Montana 

Boise, Idaho 

Bozeman, Montana (in cooperation with 
Montana State University) 

Logan, Utah (in cooperation with Utah State 
University) 

Missoula, Montana (in cooperation with 
University of Montana) 

Moscow, Idaho (in cooperation with the 
University of Idaho) 

Provo, Utah (in cooperation with Brigham 
Young University) 

Reno, Nevada (in-cooperation with the 
University of Nevada) 


2 
3. = 
“MENT OF AGRIOS