Skip to main content

Full text of "Water level measurements in the polar regions : status and technology"

See other formats


NORA- 
Tm) MOS opaA-54Y 


NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 54 


WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS IN THE POLAR REGIONS: 


STATUS AND TECHNOLOGY 


\ 


DOCUMENT 
LIBRARY 

Woods Hole Oceanographic 

Institution 


— 


Rockville, Maryland 
September 1990 


Nn O a a NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION 


NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE 


Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment 
National Ocean Service 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
U.S. Department of Commerce 


The Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment (OMA) provides decisionmakers with 
comprehensive, scientific information on characteristics of the oceans, coastal areas, and 
estuaries of the USA. The information ranges from strategic, rational assessments of coastal and 
estuarine environmental quality to real-time information for navigation or hazardous materials 
spill response. For example, OMA monitors the rise and fall of water levels at about 200 
coastal locations of the USA (including the Great Lakes); predicts the times and heights of high 
and low tides; and provides information critical to national defense, safe navigation, marine 
boundary determination, environmental management, and coastal engineering. Currently, OMA 
is installing the Next Generation Water Level Measurement System that will replace by 1992 
existing water level measurement and data processing technologies. Through its National Status 
and Trends Program, OMA uses uniform techniques to monitor toxic chemical contamination of 
bottom-feeding fish, mussels and oysters, and sediments at 200 locations throughout the USA. A 
related OMA program of directed research examines the relationships between contaminant 
exposure and indicators of biological responses in fish and shellfish. 


OMA uses computer-based circulation models and innovative measurement technologies to 
develop new information products, including real-time circulation data, circulation forecasts 
under various meteorological conditions, and circulation data atlases. OMA provides critical 
scientific support to the U.S. Coast Guard during spills of oil or hazardous materials into marine 
or estuarine environments. This support includes spill trajectory predictions, chemical hazard 
analyses, and assessments of the sensitivity of marine and estuarine environments to spills. 
The program provides similar support to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund 
Program during emergency responses at, and for the cleanup of, abandoned hazardous waste 
sites in coastal areas. To fulfill the responsibilities of the Secretary of Commerce as a trustee 
for living marine resources, OMA conducts comprehensive assessments of damages to coastal and 
marine resources from discharges of oil and hazardous materials. 


OMA collects, synthesizes, and distributes information on the use of the coastal and oceanic 
resources of the USA to identify compatibilities and conflicts and to determine research needs 
and priorities. It conducts comprehensive, strategic assessments of multiple resource uses in 
coastal, estuarine, and oceanic areas for decisionmaking by NOAA, other Federal agencies, state 
agencies, Congress, industry, and public interest groups. It publishes a series of thematic data 
atlases on major regions of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone and on selected characteristics of 
major U.S. estuaries. It also manages, for the U.S. Department of the Interior, a program of 
environmental assessments of the effects of oil and gas development on the Alaskan outer 
continental shelf. 


OMA implements NOAA responsibilities under Title Il of the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972; Section 6 of the National Ocean Pollution Planning Act of 1978; and 
other Federal laws. OMA has three major line organizations: The Physical Oceanography 
Division, the Ocean Assessments Division and the Ocean Systems Division. 


NOMA 


0 0301 O086b8e & 


MBL/WHOI 


MII 


NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 54 


Water Level Measurements in the Polar Regions: 
Status and Technology 


Eugene M. Russin 
Hsing H. Shih 
Richard F. Edwing 


| FEW AS 
Nia ee he 
Rene ae HA 


Weeds Hole Oceanographic 
jasiitution 


Rockville, Maryland 
September 1990 


DENCO 


United States National Oceanic and National Ocean Service 
Department of Commerce Atmospheric Administration 

Robert A. Mosbacher John A. Knauss Virginia K. Tippie 

Secretary Assistant Secretary and Assistant Administrator 


Administrator 


Correspondence relative to this report should be addressed to the authors in care of: 


Ocean Services Division 

Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
U.S. Department of Commerce 

6001 Executive Blvd., Rm. 110 

Rockville, MD 20852 


NOTICE 


This report has been reviewed by the National Ocean Service of the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and approved for publication. Such approval does not 
signify that the contents of this report necessarily represent the official position of NOAA or of 
the Government of the United States, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products 
constitute endorsement of recommendation for their use. 


TABLE OF CONTENTS 


List of Figures 


ABSTRACT 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

2.0 PRESENT EFFORTS AND TECHNOLOGY 

on Background 

2.2 The Polar Region Environment 

2.3 NOS Efforts 

6). Tide Stations 

232: Bench Marks 

2.3.3. Dinkum Sands Project 

2.4 Canadian Efforts 

2.5 Other Countries Efforts 

Zone Japan 

PAIS) 7X U.S.S.R. 

gayseh New Zealand 

2.6 Recent and Applicable Meetings and Workshops 
2.7 Organizations Interested in the Polars Regions 
3.0 WHAT NOAA/NOS COULD DO IN THE NEAR-TERM 
3.1 Prudhoe Bay Saltwater Treatment Plant 

3.2 Thermal Bench Marks 

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS 

4.1 Conclusions 

4.2 Recommendations for Future Study and Work 


Appendix A. REFERENCES 


Appendix B. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Page 


Sao Oe &) Aaa @ WM D 


10 


Al 


B1 


List of Figures 


. The Arctic Region 

. The Antarctic Region 

. NOS Tide Stations in Alaska 

. Present Data Acquisition 

. Next Generation Water Level Measurement System 
. Possible Polar Region Installation 

. Dinkum Sands Project Tide Station Installation 

. Canadian Developments 


Oo ON Ooh WO YO — 


. The present system of tidal observation at the Japanese SYOWA Station 
10. Pruhoe Bay, Alaska, NGWLMS Site Sketch 
11. Thermo Bench Mark 


Page 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
29 


WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS IN THE POLAR REGIONS 
STATUS AND TECHNOLOGY 


E. M. Russin, H. H. Shih and R. F. Edwing 


National Ocean Service, NOAA 


ABSTRACT 


Continuous sea level measurements have been made and recorded for more than 100 years, 
but their importance has increased dramatically in the past few years due to the great international 
interest for monitoring global levels in anticipation of climate warming. Since the National Ocean 
Service (NOS) is the primary agency for measuring and recording water levels in the United States, 
itis being encouraged to increase the number of permanent sea level measuring stations especially 
in the polar regions where the data are extremely sparse. 


Personnel from the Physical Oceanography Division (POD) and the Ocean Systems Division 
(OSD) of the Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment (OOMA) have been researching the 
status of the technology and the requirements for water level measurements in the polar regions 
with special emphasis on the needs of NOAA’s Climate and Global Change Program and The Global 
Sea Level Observing System, known as GLOSS. It is called GLOSS because it measures the global 
level of the sea surface, a smooth level after averaging out waves, tides and meteorological events. 
GLOSS, co-ordinated by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC), provides high 
quality standarized data from which valuable sea level products are prepared for international and 
regional research programs as well as for practical national applications. 


This report includes a survey of the work that NOS and others are or have been doing in this 
area and also assesses the state-of-the-art of the technology involved, the potential for future 
development, and provides recommendations for near and long-term projects. The report con- 
cludes that the technology and techniques exist for making sea level measurements in polar regions 
but that they must be site-specific; also, that stable bench mark connections and atmospheric 
pressure measurements are mandatory; that the field measurement system should be as 
automated as possible; and that near real-time transmission of data is highly desirable to ensure 
proper system operation and early availability of information to users. The report recommends the 
use of thermal bench marks in certain polar areas and the further development of acoustic and 
electromagnetic means of transmitting data from underwater sensors through the ice or land to 
nearby shore stations. It also recommends that Prudhoe Bay, AK be established as a pilot station 
for further investigations into the measurement requirements of other Arctic stations and that a 
cooperative program be initiated with the National Science Foundation for establishing stations in 
Antarctica. 


1.0 INTRODUCTION 


Continuous sea level measurements have been made and recorded for more 
than 100 years, but their importance has increased dramatically in the past few 
years due to the great international interest for monitoring global levels in 
anticipation of climate warming. Some scientists believe that the long term rise 
of sea level is due to three processes: thermal expansion of the upper layers of 
the ocean, the melting of glacial ice, and the addition of mass from the polar caps. 


Since the National Ocean Service (NOS) in the National Oceanic and Atmos- 
pheric Administration (NOAA) is the primary agency for measuring and recording 
water levels in the United States, it is being encouraged to increase the number 
of permanent sea level measuring stations, especially in the polar regions where 
the data are extremely sparse. 


Personnel from the Physical Oceanography Division (POD) and the Ocean 
Systems Division (OSD) of the Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment 
(OOMA) held a meeting on March 29, 1990 to discuss the status and requirements 
of water level measurement in the polar regions with special emphasis on the 
needs of NOAA’s Climate and Global Change Program and the Global Sea Level 
Observing System, known as GLOSS. It is called GLOSS because it measures 
the global level of the sea surface, a smooth level after averaging out waves, tides 
and meteorological events. GLOSS, co-ordinated by the Intergovernmental 
Oceanographic Commission (IOC), provides high quality standardized data from 
which valuable sea level products are prepared for international and regional 
research programs as well as for practical national applications. 


This report is a follow-up to that March 1990 meeting and includes a survey 
of the work that NOS and others are or have been doing in this area and also 
assesses the state-of-the-art of the technology, the potential for future develop- 
ment, and provides recommendations for near- and long-term projects. This 
report can be used as a basis for planning, for future discussions within NOS and 
NOAA and with other U.S. agencies, and also with other nations. 


2.0 PRESENT EFFORTS AND TECHNOLOGY 
2.1 Background 


The lack of U.S. sea level data in the polar regions is due to the lack of NOS 
measurement stations in those areas. Most of the Alaskan stations are sited on 


the southern coast of Alaska with very few on the west coast and even fewer on 
the north coast. The primary reason for the Alaskan station situation is funding; 
an Arctic station could cost up to a million dollars to establish, operate and 
maintain properly. 


Station data problems occur mainly due to sensor failures or bench mark 
instability caused by either ice, icing or the freeze/thaw cycle. Sensor operability 
problems have been overcome in some remote areas by the use of gas-purging 
(bubbler) instruments connected to an onshore data collection platform. Al- 
though such instruments are not successful in areas where ice movements 
damage the gas-purging tubing in the ice/shore interface, at least the replacement 
cost is relatively low. The bench mark instability problem has been addressed in 
areas where no bedrock exists by what is called a thermal bench mark - a type 
of thermal pile filled with pressurized carbon dioxide gas used to stabilize the 
active layer (freeze/thaw zone) and prevent frost jacking. 


The following describes the environment we are addressing and the present 
efforts of the United States and other countries in the technology areas related 
to making tidal measurements in polar regions. 


2.2 The Polar Region Environment 


The relatively small tides and tidal currents, and the hostile environment in the 
polar regions have, in the past, prevented NOS from conducting any significant 
long-term ocean measurements in those regions. The term polar region in this 
report is loosely used to include the coastal waters along the north and northwest 
of the state of Alaska (i.e., in the Arctic region - the Beaufort Sea in the north, 
Chukchi Sea, Bering Strait, and Bering Sea in the northwest), and along the United 
States territory in the Antarctic region. See Figures 1 and 2. Around the Arctic 
area, NOS maintains only one tide station along the whole northwest and north 
coasts of Alaska. In the Antarctica continent, NOAA currently has four measure- 
ment stations for climate research programs but no tide measuring stations. 


Because of the hostile conditions, environmental data for the polar regions 
are scarce. A general description of the environment of the polar regions is as 
follows: 


Air Temperature: -17° C to +5° C along the coasts in the Arctic, colder 
toward the interior, and much colder in the Antarctic region. 


Water Temperature: -2°C to +20°C. 


Ice: Winter is 8 to 9 months long (from mid-September through late May in 
the Arctic), extensive ice covers the water (from the coast to a few kilometers 
offshore in the Arctic, with thickness up to 3 meters); there is significant ice 
movement (with velocities in the order of several cm/sec) after ice break-up 
(including drift of large ice bergs). The extent of the ice cover varies with the 
seasons. 


Land: Snow covered during the winter. The ground is perennially frozen to 
610 meters depth (permafrost). Surface thawing causes upheaval. Glacial 
rebound also causes vertical land movement. 


Sunlight: Weak due to low sun altitude above the horizon. 
Wind: Polar winds prevail most of the time. 
Tides: Low tidal amplitudes (less than 100 cm). 


Waves: Non-tidal water fluctuations - storm surges and low atmospheric 
pressure movement-induced long period fluctuations are frequent and often 
overshadow the tide. Extensive ice cover may affect both the amplitude and 
phase of the tide. 


Currents: Low speed (less than one-half meter per second) in offshore, and 
higher (up to several meters per second) in certain near coastal areas. An ice 
motion-induced boundary layer flow extending about 30 meters below the surface 
also exists. 


Because of the above environmental conditions, the sensors or equipment 
one designs or selects for use in the polar areas must be capable of operation at 
very low temperatures with a limited power supply and have greater sensor 
Stability and system reliability than equipment used in less hostile regions. 
Batteries are considered the most reliable power source. Solar power is not viable 
due to the low percentage on sun exposure but winds could be a possible 
supplemental power source in some areas. Due to the remoteness of the 
measurement sites, the capability of automated data collection and transmission 
is most desirable if only to monitor system performance as aminimum. Additional 
design considerations include preparing for ice cover in the long winter time and 
ice break-up and drifting during summer. 


2.3 NOS Efforts 


2.3.1 Tide Stations 


NOS’s experiences with water level measurements in polar regions have been 
only in the Arctic in Alaskan waters north of the Aleutians. There are presently 
16 permanent National Water Level Observation Network (NWLON) stations 
operating in Alaskan coastal waters (See Figure 3). Only one of them, Prudhoe 
Bay, is located in Arctic waters, and it is presently operated on a seasonal basis 
(July - September) although there are plans to make it a year-round station 
starting this year. There have been approximately 1,100 short-term historical 
stations established in Alaska, but only 20% of them were north of the Aleutians. 
The majority of these stations were operated during the summer months, and 
most utilized bottom-mounted, pressure-type gauges whereas a typical NOS 
primary tide station (Figure 4) operated year-round would have an Analog to 
Digital Recorder (ADR) gauge with a float inside a 12-inch stilling well and a 
bubbler gauge as a back-up. 


In general, the combination of insufficient resources and the harsh Arctic 
winter has prevented the establishment of any long-term, year-round NOS water 
level stations to-date. The specific obstacles to establishing Arctic tide stations 
with NOS’s present water level measurement technology, whether it be the older 
ADR or the newer Next Generation Water Level Measurement System 
(NGWLMS), can be summarized as follows: 


e Lack of vertical support structures for stilling and protective wells; 
e Ice pack movement, shallow water depths, freezing wells; 
e Bench mark instability; and 


e Difficulty and cost of transportation, logistics, utilities, maintenance, etc. 
due to the remoteness of the sites. 


Although the NGWLMS uses an air acoustic device as its primary water level 
sensor, and therefore also requires a support structure, it can also take inputs 
from pressure transducers or other underwater sensors and transmit the data via 
the GOES satellite communication system so that system performance can be 
monitored and users receive the data in near real-time (see Figure 5). ANGWLMS 
unit with an acoustic water level sensor has been recently installed, however, in 


Prudhoe Bay, AK - only because that is a unique Arctic facility as explained in 
Section 3.1. A possible installation of an NGWLMS Data Collection Platform 
(DCP) with a bubbler system under the ice is illustrated in Figure 6. 


The few existing Arctic marine facilities are typically gravel causeways extend- 
ing out into the shallow waters, sometimes miles from shore. They are built with 
a low profile and sloping sides to minimize damage from ice pack movement. 
Sheet pile is used infrequently along the causeways for various purposes. 
However, ice scouring and the shallow water depths make it impossible to operate 
through the winter any system attached to the sheet pile. Even when wells are 
protected from destruction by ice movement, it is very difficult to prevent the water 
from freezing inside the wells. 


There have been a few stations designed for year round operation on the 
gravel causeway type facilities. A sump-type design was utilized to avoid some 
of the problems discussed above. The installation cost of this type station is very 
high (Several hundred thousand dollars) and none have been built. 


2.3.2 Bench Marks 


Bench mark stability is essential to preserving the datums established at a 
site. Bench mark stability has been a problem in the Arctic region due to the lack 
of bedrock and a large active zone. The lack of bedrock (and large concrete 
structures) eliminates the most stable, easily established type of bench mark. The 
large active zone, the layer of earth where a jacking action is produced by the 
freeze-thaw cycle, renders all monument and pipe marks, and a large number of 
Class B (unsleeved) deep rod marks, unstable. Permafrost, in itself, does not 
cause instability. High stability bench marks can be established in permafrost 
areas by anchoring the bench mark into the permafrost. In areas where per- 
mafrost does not exist, Class A (sleeved) bench marks can be established which 
are insulated from the active zone. Establishing permafrost-anchored and Class 
A bench marks is expensive and difficult to do in remote areas due to the need 
to augur a 1-inch diameter guide hole. 


The remoteness of the arctic region has obvious impact on site accessibility, 
utilities service, logistics, available resources, maintenance, etc. all of which can 
be significant cost drivers in addition to installation costs. 


Tidal datums, and the marine boundaries determined through their estab- 
lishment, have been an important issue in the Arctic over the past two decades 
because of ownership claims. Millions of dollars have been at stake in State 
versus Federal ownership of oil leasing plots. The Bureau of Land Management 
has been surveying coastal lands for the purpose of restoration of the Federal 
lands to the State and native corporations; the Extended Jurisdiction Zone (200 
mile boundary) has been determined; and NOAA has been conducting 
hydrographic surveys and mapping in the Arctic. The private sector uses tidal 
datums for artificial island construction, marine operations and other oil industry 
related activities. These projects all require tide data, to varying degrees of 
accuracy and for differing lengths of time, that has not been previously available 
in this region. These requirements, and the inability of standard technology and 
methods to satisfy them, has resulted in development and experimentation with 
new and improved procedures and instrumentation in an attempt to collect the 
needed tide data. 


2.3.3 Dinkum Sands Project 


Much of the search for new technology or procedures for making tide 
measurements in the polar regions has been performed in cooperation with the 
State of Alaska and other Federal agencies due to the common need for the data. 
The most ambitious, and costly, project was the Dinkum Sands project. An 
attempt was made to collect a full year of data off the coast of the north slope 
using standard technology (ADR & bubbler gauges) so that the tidal datums 
established would be defensible in court. Three long-term stations were estab- 
lished on three small, remote gravel islands for redundancy. The fully enclosed, 
heated, shelters (see Figure 7) were installed on specially-designed support 
platforms, heat tracing was used in the steel reinforced stilling wells, heated oil 
was dripped around the wells to prevent ice formation, bottom-mounted pressure 
gages supplemented the standard gages, and various other methods were 
employed to collect the data. Specially designed, sleeved, deep-rod bench 
marks were installed (and sometimes leveled to) while under ice pack cover. A 
full year of data was collected at one station at a cost of over $ 1 million. 


Other attempts have centered around installing bottom-mounted pressure 
gauges but these devices have their own set of problems. Pressure gages are 
inherently less accurate than ADRs and must be corrected for barometric 
pressure and density variations; it is difficult to establish a physical reference point 


on them and to survey to it; and also hard to maintain their stability on the ocean 
bottom. If the entire instrument package is underwater, proper operation is a 
continual verification problem. If the data recorder is land-based, the cabling is 
extremely difficult to protect, particularly at the shore/sea interface. Bottom- 
mounted pressure gauges have been installed several times by the State of 
Alaska and it’s contractors with limited success. 


Short-term data requirements, mostly for hydrographic or photogrammetric 
operations, are met simply by conducting measurements during the ice-free 
summer months. Standard bubbler pressure gages are used as they are 
relatively easily transported and installed in remote and/or rugged areas. In 
situations where staff installations are difficult or subject to constant destruction 
from storms, several alternative methods are available. Sometimes a rod is driven 
into the ocean bottom in a shallow area. The high point of the rod is connected 
by survey levels to the bench mark net, and a staff is held on the high point for 
staff readings during an observation. The equivalent of a staff reading may also 
be made by leveling from a bench mark to the waters edge, if sea conditions are 
calm enough. These methods are dependent upon reasonably sheltered loca- 
tions, however. 


2.4 Canadian Efforts 


With the discovery of oil and gas in the Canadian Arctic and subsequent 
decisions to transport these products to southern markets by sea, the Canadian 
Hydrographic Service (CHS) increased its involvement in collecting arctic tidal 
measurements. Initially, the emphasis was directed towards collecting short-term 
tidal records in order to obtain a general knowledge about tidal propagation 
through the complex archipelago in the Canadian Arctic. The method used to 
collect these data consisted of deploying self-recording pressure gauges on the 
sea bed and recovering the gauges after a specified elapsed time. The data 
collected from these short-term deployments were generally not corrected for 
atmospheric pressure variations and were not tied to bench marks. 


In 1985, the CHS developed a permanent gauging system with limited 
application in the Arctic. This gauge used a conventional gas-purge system to 
measure sea levels. The system is connected to a brass orifice which is located 
in a protective housing attached to a wharf face. Data collected by the gauge is 


transmitted to satellite (ARGOS) at regular intervals and processed later in 
Burlington. 


In 1987, the CHS commissioned the Bedford Institute of Oceanography (BIO) 
to design and develop an atmospheric pressure-measuring system and tide 
gauge capable of withstanding arctic conditions for an entire year. In August 
1988, BIO successfully demonstrated such a system off the coast of Labrador 
using a air pressure sensor manufactured by Atmospheric Instrumentation 
Research, Inc.(AIR Inc.) that is accurate to +0.7 millibar and consumes very little 
power. BIO is presently working on a satellite data link in order to allow the 
collected data to be transmitted to an operating center on an hourly or daily basis. 
To avoid using a physical link between the two devices, and to avoid the inherent 
problems of communicating through the ice/water barrier, the tide gauge will 
transmit ultra-low frequency electromagnetic signals to the data recording system 
through the intervening rock. Figure 8 is an artist’s conception of the system. 
Electromagnetic energy has been used in mines in South Africa to communicate 
through rock and has proved viable for short distances. A short cable will be 
used to link the tide gauge to the electromagnetic communications link, located 
nearby on the sea bottom. 


NOS is closely monitoring the progress of BIO and the Canadian 
Hydrographic Service with the hope that we can benefit from this important 
research project. Mr. George Steeves, the systems engineer in charge of the 
project, hopes to have a system with an electromagnetic communications link 
ready for testing near BIO in the winter of 1990-91. 


2.5 Other Countries’ Efforts 


2.5.1 Japan 


Japan has three observation bases in Antarctica - two of them are inland and 
the other is coastal. The coastal base, SYOWA STATION, was established in 
1958 on the East Ongul Island which is in the face of the Indian Ocean about 5 
kilometers off the Antarctic continent. In 1987, a new type of tide gauge using a 
quartz oscillator as a sensor was installed at the SYOWA STATION (see Figure 
9). In the tide observation hut there is a junction box with a heater to protect the 
equipment from freezing. The heater is designed to work when the air tempera- 
ture falls below -10° C. The signal cable from the underwater unit to the junction 


box is protected with hard plastic tubing. The tide gauge has an air venting tube 
from the junction box to the underwater unit through the cable together with the 
signal lines and DC power supplying lines in order to make corrections for the 
effect of the atmospheric pressure automatically. 


2.5.2 U.S.S.R. 


Russian activities regarding sea-level measurements at Soviet Antarctic sta- 
tions are performed by the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute of the USSR. 
Due to severe ice conditions no permanent sea-level observations have been 
made at Soviet Antarctic stations. Some rough sea-level observations have been 
made at the Stations Bellingshausen and Russkaya and, occasionally, at the 
Station Molodezhnaya. There are plans to obtain regular sea-level observations 
at some Soviet Antarctic stations in connection with the GLOSS and WOCE 
programs. This will need, however, cooperation with other countries with regard 
to the establishment of modern tide gauges and exchange of sea-level data with 
other Antarctic stations. 


2.5.3 New Zealand 


New Zealand has, at infrequent intervals, collected sea level data in the Ross 
Sea region of Antarctica since 1957. The best continuous sea level data sets are 
15 months of data from Scott Base in 1988 to 1990. The Scott Base gauge, an 
absolute pressure transducer type, was lost in a storm in February 1990. The 
gauge is to be re-established as a permanent site in 1990 with a second gauge 
to be established as a permanent site at Cape Roberts in 1991. 


2.6 Recent and Applicable Meetings and Workshops 


2.6.1 Workshop on Sea-Level Measurements in Hostile Conditions 


10 


This meeting was held at the Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, Bidston 
Observatory in Bidston, U.K. on March 28-31, 1988. The workshop ended with 
the participants agreeing on the following general conclusions: 


e The technology needed to make sea level measurements in hostile 
regions exists and is affordable; 


e the technology and techniques used must be site specific; 


e bench mark connections are mandatory using the applicable state-of- 
the-art technology; 


e atmospheric pressure measurements are mandatory using the ap- 
plicable state-of-the-art technology; 


e real-time data transmission is required to ensure proper operation and 
early availability of data to the user community; 


e since the availability of global reference systems (Very Long Baseline 
Interferometry [VLBI] and Global Positioning System [GPS]) has in- 
creased, the local reference system can be connected to them and 
subsequently the sea level data measured in relation to the latter will 
become extremely valuable; 


e bench marks themselves have to meet the technical requirements for 
the site in view of permafrost disturbances and other local hazards. 


2.6.2 First Session of IOC Group of Experts on the Global Sea-Level Observing 
System (GLOSS) 


This meeting was also held at the Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, 
Bidston Observatory in Bidston, U.K. in June 19-23, 1989. The Group discussed 
the draft report of the Committee on Geodetic Fixing of Tide Gauge Bench Marks 
(TGBMs) set up by the IAPSO Commission on Mean Sea-Level and Tides. The 
Group supported the recommendations, technical conclusions and strategy in 
the report. In particular, it was agreed that the primary strategy of connecting 
GLOSS (and other) tide gauges with differential GPS measurements to the 
fundamental VLBI/ Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) stations of the conventional 
terrestrial reference frame (of the International Earth Rotation Service [IERS]) was 
very important for the various oceanographic and geophysical requirements listed 
in the report. Wherever possible, the vertical movements of the TGBMs should 
be verified by absolute gravity measurements. 


11 


The Group discussed the five technical conclusions of the Committee’s draft 
report and made the following recommendations: 


e ‘It is recommended that all gauges used to monitor mean sea-level must 
have a local network of bench marks (6 to 10) that are resurveyed by 
accurate levelling or GPS at least once per year and that information on 
this local bench mark control should be collected by the Permanent 
Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL). 


e Using the accuracy of differential GPS stated in the report (1 cm in 1000 
km) and the positions of the IERS (VLBI/SLR), it is possible to identify 
those GLOSS gauges that can be fixed to within 1 cm radially with 
respect to the IERS stations. It is recommended that the GLOSS gauges 
within this range and with, for example, (a) 20 years mean sea-level data 
and (b) 60 years mean sea-level data be identified and priority be given 
to geocentric location of these gauges. 


elt is recommended that GLOSS gauges that have 60 years mean 
sea-level data, and where no IERS station is within 1000 km, should be 
identified as priority locations for either permanent VLBI/SLR stations or 
for mobile VLBI/SLR measurements. 


e It is recommended that present IERS stations with no suitable GLOSS 
gauges within 1000 km should be identified and consideration should 
be given to installing suitable tide gauges within this range. 


e It is recommended that the PSMSL would be a suitable center to collect, - 
archive and distribute the geodetic information for each TGBM and that 
the PSMSL should consult the IERS Directing Board with regard to the 
information defining the geodetic reference frame that needs to be 
stored." 


2.6.3 Workshop on Sea Level Measurements in Antarctica 


This meeting was held in Leningrad, USSR in May 28-31, 1990. The par- 
ticipants at this workshop reported the following specific problems facing in- 
stallers of reliable tide gauges in the Antarctic region: 


e Ice scouring on the near-shore sea bed; 
e the destruction of support structures by sea ice; 
e the logistics of gauge maintenance; 


e the lack of ice free locations and/or the unknown spurious effects 
encountered when using a gauge with a heated stilling well; 


12 


e the power requirements necessitated by any mechanism including 
automated data uplink to a satellite. 


The Group’s review of the gauges currently in operation revealed that one was 
a conventional float gauge (using a heated stilling well), one was a bubbler gauge 
and four were absolute pressure gauges. 


The consensus of the participants was that the most appropriate type of gauge 
for Antarctic conditions was a bottom-mounted absolute pressure gauge, both 
recessed into the sea floor and with cabling either recessed into the local rock or 
well protected by some other means from ice action. The Group also agreed that 
gauges must be calibrated on an annual basis at ice free periods. 


2.6.4 Second Session of the |OC Group of Experts on the Global Sea-Level 
Observing System (GLOSS) 


This meeting will be held in Miami, FL, USA in October, 1990. 


2.7 Organizations Interested in the Polar Regions 


Organization Country Contact Person 
NOAA/NOS USA L.Baer 
301-443-8938 
National Science Foundation USA T. Delaca 
Div. of Polar Programs 202-357-7894 
IOC France V. Jivago 
Ocean Services Unit 33-1-45-68-40-44 
Canadian Hydrographic Service Canada G.M. Yeaton 
Tides,Currents, Water Levels 
Flinders University Australia G.W. Lennon 
School of Earth Sciences 08-275.2298 
Inst. of Oceanographic Sciences U.K. D.T. Pugh 


042879-4141 


13 


U. of Hawaii USA K. Wyrtki 


Dept. of Oceanography 808-948-7633 
Arctic/Antarctic Res. Inst. USSR V. Ivchenko 
Comm. for Hydrometeorology 352-03-19 
Dept. of Survey/Land Info NZ: J. Hannah 
New Zealand 64-4-710-380 
Hydrographic Dept. Japan M. Odamaki 
Maritime Safety Agency 81-3-541-3811 
Army Corps of Engineers USA J. Brown 
Cold Regions Res.& Eng. Lab 

Off. of Naval Research USA T. Curtin 
Arctic R & D 703-696-4118 
U. of Alaska USA D. Kowalik 
Modelling 907-474-7753 


3.0 WHAT NOAA/NOS COULD DO IN THE NEAR-TERM 


NOS is presently performing two projects to improve measurements in the 
Arctic region. The first is the establishment of a year-round tide station on the 
north slope of Alaska. The second is the testing and evaluation of a new type 
bench mark resistant to frost heave. 


3.1 Prudhoe Bay Saltwater Treatment Plant 


The establishment of a long-term, year-round, tide station, using NGWLMS 
technology, at the ARCO Saltwater Treatment Plant (STP) in Prudhoe Bay was 
accomplished in July 1990. This station will replace the seasonal Prudhoe Bay 
station located about 1.6 Km away on the same gravel causeway known as West 
Dock. A year-round station at the STP is possible only through the unique 
circumstances associated with the STP design. The ARCO STP is a massive 
barge sunk in-place at the end of West Dock. It is surrounded on three sides by 
gravel, with the fourth side fronting onto a small, sheltered, bay. The STP is used 
to process seawater before it is pumped underground to facilitate oil removal. 
Two bubbler gages were installed at the STP in August of 1988. The instruments 


were located inside the reservoir room at the southern end of the barge, which 
is where the large water intakes are located. One orifice was installed outside the 
barge (on a pile), and the other was installed inside the barge, just inside one of 
the large intakes to the western reservoir. See Figure 10. 


The purpose of two gages was to determine whether or not the water level in 
the western reservoir truly reflected the outside water level, so that it might provide 
a protected environment for the establishment of a permanent station using 
standard equipment. It was initially thought that the outside orifice would not 
survive the severe winter conditions. 


After a year of operation, tidal analysts of the Physical Oceanography Division 
determined that the inside water level does accurately reflect the true outside 
water level. In addition the outside orifice survived the winter conditions so well 
that it is now believed that an outside orifice can be permanently maintained. In 
July, 1990, a full NGWLMS was installed inside the STP. In addition, the outside 
orifice is being used, and a digital bubbler gauge, using a high precision 
Paroscientific pressure sensor, is measuring the pressure variation in the gas- 
purged tubing. This station is the United States’ first permanent year-round tide 
station north of the Aleutians! 


Future projects in this area could be the establishment of other stations, on 
facilities like the Arco STP if they exist at other oil fields, or on some of the oil 
companies’ artificial islands. Investigations should be conducted to determine 
the number and locations of these types of facilities and analyses made of their 
suitability as strategic GLOSS stations. 


3.2 Thermal Bench Marks 


A new type of bench mark was developed inhouse through the application of 
existing technology. It is being tested for use in remote areas where no bedrock 
or permafrost exists, and Class A type bench marks are too difficult or expensive 
to install. The new type bench mark, called a thermopile or "thermo" bench mark, 
is a type of bench mark specifically designed to resist the frost heave (vertical) 
forces generated by seasonal freeze/thaw cycles, specifically in Arctic regions. 
The thermo bench mark operates on a heat transfer mechanism and is generically 
known as a two-phase closed thermosyphon. Ten foot of a 1-inch diameter iron 
pipe is sealed and pressurized to 600 psi with carbon dioxide gas. The process 


15 


is activated only when the air temperature is colder than the ground temperature. 
The temperature differential can be as small as one degree. The temperature 
differential starts an evaporation /condensation cycle within the pipe. The material 
within the pipe is in both a liquid and gas state due to being charged with a 
refrigerant. Heat is absorbed from the ground through evaporation of the liquid 
which rises to the top of the pipe. The rising gas meets the colder air temperature 
and condenses, radiating heat out from the upper half foot of pipe. Gravity pulls 
the condensate back down the pipe to the bottom and starts the cycle over again. 
This cycle tends to keep the thermopile at a uniform temperature over its entire 
length. This will reduce the thermal expansion /contraction effects and result in 
freezing occurring radially about the thermopile. Ice lenses and other associated 
pressures will develop radially and therefore not in the vertical direction necessary 
to cause heaving. See Figure 11. 


Three thermo bench marks were installed in Port Moller in 1987 to supplement 
five standard Class B deep-rod bench marks installed in 1984. Three of the Class 
B deep-rod marks are steadily being jacked out of the ground by frost heave. To 
date, after three years of seasonal freeze and thaw, the three thermo bench marks 
have not shown any movement. 


It is recommended that thermo bench marks be incorporated into NOS’ 
accepted bench mark types and be used at remote sites with suitable conditions, 
where appropriate. 


4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
4.1 Conclusions 


The conclusions of this report are essentially the same conclusions reached 
by the various workshops held on making water level measurements in polar 
regions. The problems are associated with ice scouring on the near-shore sea 
bed, the destruction of support structures by sea ice, the logistics of gauge 
installation and maintenance, the lack of ice free locations, and the necessary 
power requirements of the site. But, on the other hand, it appears that these 
problems are not insurmountable and, with proper planning and resources, are 
definitely solvable. The consensus of the experts is that the technology needed 
to make sea level measurements in polar regions exists today and is considered 
affordable. However, the technology needed and the techniques used for 


16 


installation and maintenance are quite site specific and therefore no standard 
"manual" can be written at this time. Bench mark connections and atmospheric 
measurements made in conjunction with underwater pressure sensors are con- 
sidered mandatory using the applicable state-of-the-art technology for the site. 
Near real-time data transmission is highly desirable to ensure proper operation 
of the station equipment and early availability of the data to the user community. 
Also desirable is to make the field measurement system as automated as possible 
and to connect the local measurement and reference system to the VLBI and 
GPS global reference systems, if available. 


4.2 Recommendations for Future Study and Work 


The United States (and therefore NOAA/NOS) appears to have fallen behind 
the other countries of the world in making water level measurements in hostile 
environments and in particular the polar regions. The following general and 
specific recommendations are made relating to future efforts that NOS should 
continue or commence to ensure its world leadership in the area of water level 
measurements. 


4.2.1 | tion 


- Continue to actively support NOAA’s Climate and Global Change Program 
and the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) GLOSS Program. 
These two programs provide the network of international experts and hopefully 
resources to obtain world-wide high quality standardized data from which valu- 
able sea level products will be obtained. 


- Establish near and long-term objectives and goals for NOS for making 
measurements in polar regions. A committee consisting of a subset of the 
managers involved in the Climate and Global Change Program should prepare 
such a list of goals and objectives for NOS over the next ten years initially and 
then beyond. 


- Foster development of advanced technology through the DOC Small Busi- 
ness Innovation Research (SBIR) Program and others means such as grants, 
contracts and visiting research scientists/engineers. 


17 


- Establish cooperative programs with other agencies (NSF, COE, NASA, 
etc.), universities and foreign governments. The National Science Foundation is 
very interested in polar research and funds many projects in Antarctica but its 
mission prevents it from funding monitoring programs. It appears feasible that a 
cooperative program could exist between NSF and NOAA whereby NSF funds 
the initial research portion of a water level measurement project in the Antarctic 
and then NOAA would continue the funding when the project becomes more 
routine. A similar type of arrangement could be made with the U.S. Army’s Cold 
Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory or with NASA. We already have 
cooperative projects in progress with the Canadians, British, Australians, and 
Russians and should expand them to include field measurements in polar regions. 
NOS should also develop projects with Japan and New Zealand. 


4.2.2 Specific Recommendations 


- Investigate and find additional suitable sites for polar tide stations such as 
the one established at the Prudhoe Bay, AK Saltwater Treatment Plant. After 
suitable sites are found, they should be prioritized and an installation schedule 
generated. The Prudhoe Bay site should be established as a pilot station for 
continued R&D activities. 


- Continue to refine techniques for the installation of thermal bench marks at 
appropriate cold region sites. These types of bench marks have been proven 
very successful in areas where an active zone exists on top of the permafrost 
layer. 


- Continue and foster the development of acoustic and electromagnetic links 
for the transmission of information through the water/ice interface. A few 
American companies have developed prototype underwater acoustic modems 
with much improved reliability and data rates. A Canadian company has 
developed a prototype electromagnetic device for transmitting data from sensors 
under the water to aland-based receiver. Both of these developments show great 
promise as the communication links of the future. 


18 


uoibey dndJy oUL “| eunbi4 


\ 
\ 
Z 


\ 
pivs! N 
Yi VINOLIIAN 
\ 


~~ ee 


SS \ 


GNVIS! Nibjve 


/ 


| 3u3WS3103 


kes GNV1N3349 l 


/ < NK \ x 
SS ~ 
/ i 


vist 


7 ‘ouiova 


ONV 1Si. 


vusSVIV 40 »v ION 


VASVIV 


| syunquiny & 


vas d 
IHOMNHO 
WS 


° 
M0408 Id 


vas 


inosnvag ONvas| if 
/ V139NVeM 


~ 
x 


vas 


a 


370d HLXON 


BL/b ONSDIY 40 BOY jO;UaWUOsIAUG 


HLYON 


SONV1S! 
NvILN3dv 


\ 


w 
Nwuaais, \ % 


SESSBJODON|OD 


ueed0C UP/pUl 


uoibey onouejuy eUuL “Zz eunbi4 


ueedO JyJ9ed YyINOS 


Ud}}JEIS 
OPpJNIWOW 


uOone}S 
SOMIIM 


uonels 
pkg 
@ 


UONEIS E10d YyINOS Aue 
yj09S-uespunwiy & 
= 


udHeIS 
neejeid jloUuS 99] 
e JOUUd|!4 


VOILOYUVLNV 


uoney 
YYOms|| 


eouesjUuy 
euuoYy ees 


IlEPPEM 


uee90 ORUeNY YyINOS 


yweus 09] [J 


SUOI}E]S PUNOI-1EBA JOWIO4 


suonelg punol-see, yueLND @ 


Aeg 
ewenbiew 


peseg se 


> UO}eIS JOWIed 
spue|s| 


20 


eySE|Y Ul SUONLIS SPILL SON “€ eNbi4 


A) (5) 
aa ° G oWQ 2 
nyo e “a wvGV & S G 
Reese lowyNG 
VYSV TV 4O FIND INIOd GNVS ~¢ F 
3 a Ava TOLSIYE a 
po (ys Oo w 
S 9 NVAIHD i yvIGO ue , y 
ges . MALIS wIAOG1as Ya suojyeis Epil jeuosees HH 
= Mk ae ; & suones eplL SON Bursa @ 
nvannr~ \ YAHSIMIN : Sy 
AYMOWAS Sioa / FDVHOHONY 
VAOGHOO GNNOS 
— NOLYON MS _ 
\ a 
; ‘wsn 1 9S 
vavNVo \ WISVIV Nos y 
: ‘us’s'n 
AVa SOHGNYd VAS IHOMNHD 
Dp 
VAS LYOF 
O4NVAg MG \ 


SNOILVLS AGIL SON 


21 


wa}sAs uolsinboy e}eq yUueseld “py einbi 
SNVLNI 39141a0 


35141d0 a3 dan TW13M ONIVIVULS 


f 


UNS) 


ONT Wd 


Vall 
NOILVOI4ILvaLS ~~ 
ALISN3d ~7—~ 


TAA41 SaLVA NVSW LNATEWy 
S3AVA 


V1S9M JSCISNI 13A31 


MGLVM SNO3NVINVISNI = 


N SS 
ddId 


ONIGNL 83 adn 


ivO4 MaVW HONIG 
3aIM LvO14 SqSV SSS Orel 
Oi 
39V9 af 1ddnd 39v9 wav 


3SMOH Adit 


22 


| 
: 
| 
| 


JUN Reka) <== 


1 
el 
= 


\ 

\ 

\ 

| 

| 
ee ea a 
mal |[l/M0 


Vall 
NOLLVOI4ILvalS ~~ 
ALISN30. 77 


wia}shs }UsWSINSeS|] [BAD] 18}eM\ UOILIOUSH 1XON ‘SG ounbi4 


YOSN3S 


JSYNSS3dd oN 


aS 


TAA371 YaLVA NVSAW LN3IEWy 
SSAVA 


V1SM 3CISNI 143A31 
SALVA SNOANVINGLSNI 


Fant | 


ONIGNNOS/NOI LV 1Vv9 
V1I3M 3ATLO39L0¢d 


) N 
oS 
= 

/ 


YOSN3S JILSNODV 


WdO4LV 1d 
NOILO3ST1IO9 Vivd AYVAIdd 


= SZ 
ad3lId 


MaVW HONIE 


4AVLS HLIM ADEW3ASSY¥ 
ddvOd ONINOVA YOSNIS 


WYO4LV 1d NOWDITIOD VLIVG dNyXOVva 


YNNJINY $309 NG 


SSNOH 3dIL 


23 


Oq 
ainssaid 
89110 


39140 
sajqqng 


d 
Ayisuap 
Jayem 


eq 
ainssaid 
oueydsowjye 


Buigny 
auajAujaAjod 
wh X 


POO ION ors 
yoRY 9d} 


" 


uonelje}sul UOIBeY 1ej0d a|qISSOd “9 einbi4 


H6d = 
ey = 04 = 
wd eainssaid a6e6 painseaw 


(dOG 0006 SAIMON) 
Wu0}}e|d UONDA||O9 eyep « 
(dyUaldsoseq) 
Jaonpsued) ainssaid « 
yun jOujU09 MO} SEB « 
JapuljAo se6 passaidwoo « 


uoNeIS 
JOA97 JOVEN 


ix YN Y) 


Ie 
youag 


24 


hs - Stabilization [_] 


| 
! 
| 
Upper Level & | ! /. AccessDoor 1 | 
Instrument | ! Let ae 
Access Door! a Vo 
| I 14 
I | 


— Electrical Fuse & 
Junction Box 


Steel Structure With 
2" Styrofoam Insulation 


Wood Structure With 
ih 2" Styrofoam insulation 


Lower structure slides 

up & down around outside 
of upper structure as the 
tide comes in and goes out 


If 
al 
\ 
Diesel Stove 
| Fuel Barrel 
Bubbler 


— 
~~ Tube 
A 


ZED 18"x30"x48" Submerged Tank 
With Fuel Fire Stove Inside 


Heat Tape On —— 
All 3 Legs 


au ai 
“ / 


7" Round Steel Pipe With 
Fiberglass Liner For 
Stilling Well 


Figure 7. Dinkum Sands Project Tide Station Installation 


25 


3 ARCTIC BAROMETER/ 
Roe. ARGOS PLATFORM 


Se ees (Fa 


—) 


SOLB.WEIGHT - 


The atmospheric pressure-measuring system operating in situ with the satellite uplink, the 
electromagnetic (EM) link, and the submerged tide gauge. FEBRUARY 1990/SEA TECHNOLOGY 


Figure 8. Canadian Developments 


26 


uoneIS VMOAS eseueder ay} je UOHeAJOSQO jepl) jo Wa}SAs juaseld ey “6 aunbi4 
YOHONV 


JANL ONILIFLO"d 


JONVS AGI 


391 vas 49) 1SV4 


Adid NOU! MYVW HONS 


‘aV7 3ONSIOS HLYW3 (HaW3H W HLIM) 


XOd LNIOF 


x V7 V7/ 


LNH NOILVAYAS8O J4GIL 


NOILONYLSNOO Y3AGNN 
WALSAS NOISSINSNVHYL VLVG 


27 


SEAWATER 
TREATMENT 
PLANT 


Coraver 


----—) _ WESTERN RESERVOIR 
oan (inside NGLWMS location) 
i] 
\ 
! 


INTAKE #1 


z SOLITARY PILE 


(Outside onitice location) 


CIRCULAR CELL SHEET PILE BULKHEAD 


(Geena SEAWATER 


RESERVO! TREATMENT ‘UwesterN RESERVOIR 
PLANT 7 


FISH DIVERTER SCREEN 


NGWLMS DCP LOCATION \ 


INSULATED WALL 


Figure 10. Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, NGWLMS Site Sketch 


28 


3° DIA. ALUMINUM DISK 
WITH THREADED STUD 


FALL: The active layer starts 
freezing from the top and 
Proceeds down. Ice lenses 
form creating heave forces in 
upward direction. The thermo 
bench mark is activated by the 
air temperature dropping below 
ground temperature. The 
refngerant is heated to the 
boiling point by the higher 
ground temperature along the 
bottom of the mark, and 
evaporates to the top, where it 
condenses. The condensate 
then retums to the bottom of 
the mark through gravity. This 
thermal cycling draws heat out 
of the ground radially around 
the thermo bench mark. The 
radial freezing prevents ice 
lense formation adjacent to the 
mark and therefore upward 
heaving forces. Higher 
temperatures near the top of 
the mark also cause the frozen 
soil to sublimate and relax its 
grip on the mark. 


ACTIVE LAYER 


WINTER: The active layer is 
completely frozen and the 
potential for frost heave is past. 
The thermo bench mark 
continues to cycle and reduce 
the grip of the frozen soil near 
the surface. 


SPRING/SUMMER: Air 
temperature is greater than 
ground temperature and the 
thermo bench marks thermal 
cycling stops. No heave forces 
are present during these 
seasons. 


1° DIA. EPOXY COATED 
PIPE FILLED WITH 
PRESSURIZED CO, GAS. 


REFRIGERANT FLUID 


PERMAFROST: 


DRIVING HEAD WITH 
THREADED STUD 


% 
HEAT FLOW = = —>> EVAPORATION QU? CONDENSATION 


Figure 11. Thermo Bench Mark 


29 


' et teh ma am sf 


Se ee ee a 


k acuavent Wp 
wee nataal | (CRE 


- et en ae a op { jue 


i, a, TERRI AA RII 


j 1 tie ee Pein s pierre aie 
[ 4 4 a a PEaTARO ANS | Bes ns 
; ) (i seen meacie ‘ “ 1 yur meen om Negus ear ers ata shes Ay ea 4 Pe / earners jn ‘sree MERRY OY 
ars: ~parrnedricr: Phy err tetas Sb ooo 
Liha a reno commnedt? 


APPENDIX A 


REFERENCES 


Aagaard, K. et al. Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program 
(OCSEAP) Final Reports of Principal Investigators. NOAA/NOS/OMA. Vol. 65. 
January, 1990. 


Brochure of Artic Foundations, Inc., Anchorage, AK. Erozen Assets. Erwin 
L.Long, President. 1983. 


Global Sea-Level Observing System (GLOSS) Implementation Plan. Fifteenth 
Session of the IOC Assembly. (IOC-XV/8 Annex 4) Paris, 4-19 July 1989. 


Hartman,C.W., and P.R. Johnson. Environmental Atlas of Alaska. University of 
Alaska. Revised 1984. 


Report of First Session of IOC Group of Experts on the Global Sea-Level 
Observing System (GLOSS). Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, Bidston, 
U.K., 19-23 June 1989. 

Russin, E.M., T.N. Mero, and S.K. Gill. NOAA’s Water Level Measurement System 


for the Nineties and Beyond. Conference Proceedings. Marine Instrumentation 
90 Exposition and Conference. pp 52-56. February, 1990. 


Schwerdtfeger, W. Weather and Climate of the Antarctic. Elsevier, NY, 1984. 


Shih, H.H. Pneumatic Tide Gauge Upgrade. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOS 
OMA46. 1989. 


Smith, T.E. Atmospheric Barometer Measures Sea Surface Height. Sea Technol- 
ogy. February, 1990. 


Steeves, G., Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Nova Scotia, Canada, personal 
communication, May 31, 1990. 


Weller, G. and S.A. Bowling, Editors. Climate of the Artic. 24th Alaska Science 
Conference. University of Alaska. 1973. 


Workshop on Sea-Level Measurements in Antarctica. |OC Workshop, Draft 
Report, Leningrad, USSR, 28-31 May 1990. 


Workshop on Sea-Level Measurements in Hostile Conditions. |OC Workshop 
Report No. 54. Bidston, U.K., 28-31 March 1988. 


Wrathall, P., Correpro Atlantic, Ltd., Nova Scotia, Canada, personal communica- 
tion, August 13, 1990. 


Al 


7 i. inet, Godateeln ma 4 (2BOIE) 
hia be ake ene at ei | 


lowe see twice ert No ohn So thoi) BOI: to. adlbeee he 1B nx 
nS wicca aioanee pate TINCEON — evade 2G 
Panu. oS 


v 
“A 


deade elivaeteaanolh lwo. vesete \C) fi) 12 borne: Sule Wy, Me, 
} CRaESIT AT RRO rs edie poet booved Gig Bdito-w 
ee OR Apne HIF B-S8 a6 é rave oS) bike alia 


r etiiecsiie baiprtog ¥ DAC 1 para a mote oy 


Ve Sau ond ingle ecnathue eed era solace wel srengaerth ay if 
7 ie | DY Vicia 2, sense) stone mA rinigonaieD to atnitend Gebea a: ‘ } 
ee yh ee \Oe8er AE yeni “suena 
Ve 7 | SORSIOE aout HOR) oi wit MO eternite CMe ad siwoel M2 bn Qo soo a 
Hie. — uF 4 ‘e¢Rt Ba > yttenevic) aT ter 
ee tend, aoe arta SOI .acitoeinA nl aindmanamal levetee? ng eprania! a 
a ane | IGT at TEAMS |G a bengine Hoge” a 
“| 7 : ' ore AON DOr’. srieithis rich oy olite of 6 | ee | wr eyatioM ‘aves age OQ, 0 jorholly y 
, | BBRE rave TEAR YALU inorebid ae on nogeH 
a slog 9) has rowieq as plows of ivOM, te dl oat orev a waco ig 


bee? et ie tt 


APPENDIX B 


SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Antarctic Oceanography. Proceedings of Symposium. Santiago, Chile. 
SCAR/SCOR/IAPO/IUBS. 1966. 


Barnes, P.W.,D.M. Schell, and E. Reimnitz. Editors. The Alaska Beaufort Sea 
Ecosystems and Environments. 1984. 


Coachman, L.K., K. Aagaard, and R.B. Tripp. Editors. Bering Strait, The Regional 
Physical Oceanography. 1975. 


Murphy, T.K.S., J.J. Connor, and C.A. Brebbia. Editors. Ice Technology. 
Springer-Verlag, New York. 1986. 


Rey, L. Editor. The Arctic Ocean. John Wiley and Sons. New York. 1982. 


Bi 


}, 


oe 


, ; Panes ait 
v 4 1! 4] . fd 
i ; Aaa” BAe 
: ( a ; nes oe An 
shy Ane : eR aS Aes) 


On iy 
STA 


Acknowledgement 


The authors would like to thank Patricia Bass for her assistance in the areas 
of graphics and desk top publishing. 


wi 


ily ne bb |