II it
■■*
THE WORKS
OF
FRANCIS BACON.
LIBRARY <j>
ST. ALPHONSVS SEMIJ^RY
WOODSTOCK, ONTAjfe)
, t b e I o i
THE
WORKS
OF
FRANCIS BACON,
BARON OF VERULAM, VISCOUNT ST. ALBANS
LORD HIGH CHANCELLOR OF ENG
(Eollecteti ana 25Utte
BY
JAMES SPEDDING,
OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDG
ROBERT LESLIE ELLIS, W.
LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE;
DOUGLAS DENON HEATH,
BARRISTER-AT-LAW ; LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE.
VOLUME XL
BEING
VOL. I. OF THE LITERARY AND PROFESSIONAL WORKS.
BOSTON:
PUBLISHED BY BROWN AND TAGGARD.
M DCCC LX.
RIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE :
STEREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY
H. 0. HOUGHTON.
PREFACE
Among the Harleian manuscripts in the British
Museum, there is a volume bearing the following
title : — " The Writings of Sir Francis Bacon, Knt.,
the King's Solicitor General, in Morality, Policy, and
History." It is only half filled, and contains nothing
but essays. We may infer however from the title-
page that it was at that time Bacon's intention to
gather his writings of that class into a separate col-
lection ; and I suppose that if it had been continued
and completed according to that intention, it would
have contained all such pieces as are here collected
under the title of Literary Works ; by which I mean
works which were intended to take their place among
books ; as distinguished from writings of business, which
though they may be collected into books afterwards,
were composed without reference to anything beyond
the particular occasion to which they relate. The
Philosophical Works contained in the first three vol-
umes of this edition belong of course to this class ;
and next to them in order of importance come the
vi PREFACE.
Historical, Moral, and Political Works, of which this
volume contains the most considerable.
For the particular history of each piece, and the
manner in which I have dealt with it, I refer to the
several prefaces. Those which are written in Latin,
are followed by English translations ; for which, as
indeed for everything in this volume, I am alone and
entirely responsible.
The engraving which stands as frontispiece is a very
correct representation of a bust belonging to the Earl
of Verulam, to whose kindness I am indebted for per-
mission to have a drawing made of it for this purpose,
as well as for the facilities given to the artist. It is a
colored bust in terra-cotta, and is one of a set of three,
done in the same style and material, and apparently
by the same hand ; said to be portraits of Sir Nicholas
Bacon, Anne, his second wife, and their son Francis,
when twelve years old. I regret that I could not learn
anything more about them. They must have been
done about the year 1572, by an artist of no ordinary
skill, and have probably been at Gorhambury ever
since. They show, among other things, that Bacon's
likeness was to his mother ; a fact, I believe, not other-
wise known.
J. S.
CONTENTS
OP
THE ELEVENTH VOLUME.
LITERARY WORKS.
History of the Reign of King Henry Vn. . .11
Appendix I. — Great Councils 367
U. — Perkin Warbeck's Proclamation . .374
III. — Character of Henry VII. from the Latin
Translation 379
The Beginning of the History of the Reign of
King Henry VIH. . 391
The Beginning of the History of Great Britain 399
In Felicem Memoriam Elizabeths, Anglic Reginjs 41 1
The same translated into English . . . . .443
THE
LITEKAEY AND PKOFESSIONAL WOEKS
OF
FRANCIS BACON.
LITERARY WORKS.
PKEFACE
HISTORY OF THE REIGN OF HENRY VII.
The history of the reign of King Henry the Seventh
was the first work composed by Bacon after his fall ;
the fruit of his first few months of leisure. The sub-
ject indeed of which it forms the opening chapter —
viz : a History of England from the Union of the Roses
to the Union of the Crowns — was one which he had
long before pointed out as eminently worth handling ;
but until the time when he saw his retirement from
public life inevitable, and that (to use his own words)
"being no longer able to do his country service it
remained to him to do it honour," he does not seem
to have thought of undertaking any part of it himself.
And though it may appear from a letter to the king
that he had conceived the purpose as early as the 21st
of April 1621, when he was in the middle of his
troubles, it is not before the 4th of June, when he was
released from the Tower, — hardly perhaps before the
22nd, when he returned to Gorhambury, — that he can
be supposed to have commenced the work. By the
end of the following October, or thereabouts, he had
14 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
finished this portion of it in its present form, and sent
a fair transcript to the king. It may be regarded there-
fore as the labour of a long vacation.
To say that such a work was executed in four or
five months by a man who was excluded (except dur-
ing the last six weeks) from London, where all the
unpublished materials were, is to say that it is in many
ways imperfect. The original records of the time had
not been studied by any man with a genius for writing
history, nor gathered into a book by any laborious col-
lector. The published histories were full of inaccu-
racies and omissions, which it was impossible to correct
or supply without much laborious research in public
archives and private collections. The various studies
of his civil life had made him acquainted no doubt
with many things illustrative of his subject ; but
for these he must have trusted to the fidelity of his
memory. What Sir Robert Cotton could supply was
liberally communicated ; but Cotton House was within
the forbidden precinct, and any man who has attempted
this kind of work knows how imperfect a substitute
another man's eyes and judgment are for his own. For
the rest of his raw material he must have trusted en-
tirely to the published histories then extant ; to Fabyan,
who furnished only a naked and imperfect chronicle of
London news ; to Polydore Vergil, who supplied a
narrative, continuous indeed and aspiring to be his-
torical, but superficial and careless and full of errors ;
to Hall and Holinshed, who did little more than trans-
late and embellish Polydore ; to Stowe, whose inde-
pendent and original researches had only contributed
a few additional facts and dates ; and to Speed, whose
history, though enriched with some valuable records
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 15
and digested with a more discriminating judgment than
had been brought to the task before, was yet composed
for the most part out of the old materials, and retained
almost all the errors.
From these imperfect, unskilful, and inaccurate out-
lines, aided by the fruits of his own former reading
and observation, by a learned acquaintance with the
statutes of the realm, and by such original documents
as Sir Robert Cotton could supply, to educe a living
likeness of the man and the time, to detect the true
relations of events, and to present them to the reader
in their proper succession and proportions, was the
task which he now undertook.
In this, which under such conditions was all he could
attempt, he succeeded so well that he has left later his*-
torians little to do. Subsequent researches have but
confirmed and illustrated the substantial truth of his
history in all its main features. The portrait of Henry
as drawn by him is the original, more or less faithfully
copied, of all the portraits which have been drawn
since. The theory of the events of Henry's reign as
formed and expounded by him has been adopted by
every succeeding historian as the basis of his narrative.
Those who have most slighted his authority have not
the less followed his guidance and drawn their light
from him. Those who have aspired to correct his
work have only turned a likeness into a caricature and
history into invective. The composition bears indeed
some traces of the haste with which it was written :
but if that be the best history which conveys to a
reader the clearest conception of the state and progress
of affairs during the period of which it treats, not one
of the histories of Henry the Seventh that have been
16 PEEFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
written since can bear a comparison with this. The
facts he was obliged, for the reasons above stated, to
take and leave almost as he found them ; but the effect
of his treatment of them was like that of bringing a
light into a dark room : the objects are there as they
were before, but now you can distinguish them.
In superintending a new edition of this history I
have aimed chiefly at four things. 1st, to obtain a
correct text. 2nd, to ascertain as far as possible
whether the statements in the text are accurate ; and
to point out in foot-notes all inaccuracies, however
trivial. 3rd, to supply omissions, where they seemed
important. And lastly, to notice all passages in which
the Latin translation (which was prepared under
Bacon's own eye some years after) varies in meaning
from the original English.
1. For the text, there are only two authorities of
any value : the original manuscript, which was sub-
mitted to the king in the autumn of 1621, and is
preserved (all but a few leaves) in the British Mu-
seum ; and the original edition, which was printed in
the following March. Which of these two is the best
authority, it is not easy to decide. The print, as being
the later, may be supposed to have the last corrections.
But the manuscript, as having certainly been looked
over and corrected by Bacon himself (which it is not
certain that the proof-sheets were), may be supposed
to have the fewest errors. I do not know how far it
was usual in those days for the author to meddle with
his work after it was in the printer's hands ; but in this
case, from a careful comparison of the two, I am in-
clined to think that where the print varies from the
manuscript, it is generally by mistake. It is from the
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 17
manuscript therefore that I have printed the text. The
various readings of the printed copy I have quoted in
the notes : neglecting however all varieties of mere
form, such as the introduction of capital letters, of
italics, and of inverted commas ; which, as there is no
direction for them in the manuscript, I ascribe to the
printer's fancy and the typographical fashion of the
day. In the division of the paragraphs I have also
silently followed the manuscript ; without noticing the
places where the printed copy gives a different one,
unless there be a doubt which is right. The spelling
is modernised throughout: and I have used my own
judgment as to the punctuation ; — observing always
the spirit and intention of the punctuation in the
manuscript.
This manuscript may be seen in the British Mu-
seum ; Additional MSS. vol. 7084. It is a fair tran-
script in a very clear hand. Bacon's own pen may be
recognised here and there throughout, sometimes in
the alteration of a stop, sometimes in the insertion of a
parenthesis, sometimes in the correction of a letter,
sometimes in the interlineation of two or three words.
A few leaves are wanting, which are noticed in the
places.
The printed copy is a tall quarto of 248 pages, with
the following title, The Historie of the Baigne of King
Henry the Seventh, written by the Right Honourable
Francis Lord Verulam, Viscount St. Alban. London.
Printed by W. Stansby for Matthew Lownes and Wil-
liam Barret, 1622. A portrait of Henry, with sceptre
and ball, is prefixed ; harshly engraved by John Payne ;
with the inscription cor regis inscrutabile. The face, —
thoughtful, anxious, lean, and furrowed, — seems to be
18 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
the original of the comely, grave, well-fed gentleman
with whom we are familiar in Vertue's engraving.
The book was printed and ready for publication on the
20th of March 1621-2 ; and " the printer's fingers
itched to be selling." a Some delay seems to have been
caused by a scruple of the Bishop of London ; but it
was published soon after.2
2. In order to detect inaccuracies, I have endeav-
oured (besides consulting the more recent histories)
to determine, wherever I could do so from authentic
sources, the exact dates of the transactions related ; and
where I have found them inconsistent with the narra-
tive, or have otherwise detected or seen reason to
suspect any error, I have noticed the fact ; not confin-
ing myself to cases in which the error seems to be of
consequence ; but correcting positive misstatements of
every kind ; for it is impossible to say of any fact that
it is of no consequence, unless you could know how it
may be combined with other facts and what inferences
it may be made to support.
3. With regard to the supply of omissions, on the
contrary, I have taken pains to distinguish the impor-
tant from the unimportant. Clearness of narrative
depends upon nothing more than upon the rejection of
what is immaterial ; and innumerable particulars were
no doubt omitted by Bacon on purpose. Nevertheless
many facts have come to light since Bacon's time
which he would have introduced into his narrative if
he had been aware of them ; and whatever has seemed
1 See a letter from Meautys, which appears to have been written on that
day.
2 It was out on the 6th of April. See a letter from Rev. Joseph Mead
to Sir Martin Stuteville. — Court and Times of James I., vol. ii. p. 303.
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 19
to me to be of this nature, I have not hesitated to in-
troduce in the notes. So that I hope this history may
now be recommended not only as the richest, clearest,
and liveliest narrative, and in general effect the most
faithful portraiture, of the time (which with all its
defects it always was) ; but also as the most complete
in details and the most accurate in information.
4. Lastly, with regard to the Latin translation.
This edition being intended especially for English
readers, it has not been thought desirable to increase
its size and cost by reprinting translations which were
intended only for foreigners ; and which, being for the
most part mere translations, no English reader would
prefer to the original. It was to be remembered how-
ever that they were made either by Bacon himself or
under his eye and direction (" Historiam Henrici Sep-
timi, quam etiam in Latinum verti" is his own ex-
pression in the dedication prefixed to the Sermones
Fideles) ; and therefore that where they differ in
meaning or effect more than the different idiom of the
language seems to require, the Latin must pass for the
later and better authority. I have therefore compared
the two sentence by sentence, and wherever I have
found that the Latin version contains any meaning that
is not fully or exactly represented by the English, —
that it explains an obscure, decides a doubtful, or
corrects an inaccurate expression, — I have quoted the
Latin words.
This I think is all I need say in explanation of my
own part in the revision and elucidation of this work.
A few words as to the character of the work itself.
For it will be seen that, while admitting and account-
20 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
ing for its imperfections, I have ascribed to it a sub-
stantial excellence far higher than it has credit for;
and I may be expected to give a reason for dissenting
from the popular judgment, supported as it is by some
eminent authorities.
In so far as the difference is a matter of taste, I can
only say that since the proper object of history is to
reproduce such an image of the past that the actors
shall seem* to live and the events to pass before our
eyes, that style of historical composition should be the
best in which this is most completely accomplished ;
and that I have met with no history of the reign of
Henry the Seventh, nor indeed of any other English
king, in which such an effect is produced in a degree
at all comparable to this. Indeed if the question could
be made to turn upon that point, I almost think that
such would be the general opinion. But it is true that
during the last century popular taste in this kind of
composition ran another way ; forsaking the model of
Thucydides, in whose pages the events of the Pelopon-
nesian war still live as fresh as those which we follow
day by day in the newspapers ; and declining to that
of the Annual Register, where the events of 1848, so
strange, so interesting, so agitating, as we read of them
while they were passing, may be seen laid up in 1849
as dead and dry as mummies. In so far as it is a ques-
tion of taste, Bacon's history, tried by such a standard,
must of course fail.
It is not however to a difference of taste merely, that
the low place which it holds in popular estimation must
be attributed. It is connected no doubt with a veiy
prevalent, though a very erroneous, impression, that it
is not a true portraiture of the time ; that it was written
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 21
with other objects than those of a faithful historian ;
written not to reproduce a true image of Henry the
Seventh, but to flatter the humour of James the First
by drawing such a picture of his ancestor as should
indirectly reflect honour on himself. I do not know
into" whose imagination this idea first entered, but it
lies at the bottom of most modern criticisms, and is
set forth at large by Sir James Mackintosh in a note
appended to the second volume of his History of
England, in Lardner's Cabinet Cyclopaedia. The
question being too serious to be passed over, and the
authority too respectable to be overruled without show-
ing reasons, I shall quote his note at length.
" Lord Bacon was the man of highest intellect among the writers
of history ; but he was not the greatest historian. History ought
to be without passion ; but if it be without feeling, it loses the in-
terest which bestows on it the power of being useful. The narra-
tive of human actions would be thrown aside as a mere catalogue
of names and dates, if it did not maintain its sway by inspiring the
reader with pity for the sufferer, with anger against the oppressor,
and with earnest desires for the triumph of right over might. The
defects of Bacon's nature conspired with the faults of his concep-
tion of history to taint his work with lukewarm censure of false-
hood and extortion, with a cool display of the expedients of
cunning, and with too systematic a representation of the policy of
a monarch in whose history he chose to convey a theory of king-
craft and the likeness of its ideal model. A writer who has been
successful in unravelling an intricate character often becomes
indulgent to the man whose seeming inconsistencies he has ex-
plained, and may at length regard the workings of his own inge-
nuity with a complacency which prevails over his indignation.
Aristotle, who first attempted a theory of usurpation, has escaped
the appearance of this fault, partly because sensibility is not ex-
pected, and would displease in a treatise on government. Machi-
avel was unhappily too successful in silencing his abhorrence of
crimes ; but this fault is chiefly to be found in " The Prince,'"
which is a treatise on the art of winning and keeping tyrannical
22 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
power; which was destined by the writer neither to instruct
tyrants nor to warn nations against their arts, but simply to add
the theory of these arts to the stock of human knowledge ; as a
philosophical treatise on poisons might be intended only to explain
their nature and effects, though the information contained in it
might be abused by the dealer in poison, or usefully employed for
cure or relief by the physician.
" Lord Bacon displayed a much smaller degree of this vice, but
he displayed it in history, where it is far more unpardonable. In
the singular passage where he lays down the theory of the ad-
vancement of fortune (which he knew so well and practised so
ill), he states the maxim which induced the Grecian and Italian
philosophers to compose their dissertations, ' that there be not
anything in being or action which should not be drawn into con-
templation or doctrine.' He almost avows an intention of em-
bodying in the person of his hero (if that be the proper term) too
much of the ideal conception of a wary, watchful, unbending
ruler, who considers men and affairs merely as they affect him
and his kingdom ; who has no good quality higher then prudence ;
who is taught by policy not to be cruel when he is secure, but
who treats pity and affection like malice and hatred, as passions
which disturb his thoughts and bias his judgment. So systematic
a purpose cannot fail to distort character and events, and to divest
both of their power over feeling. It would have been impossible
for Lord Bacon, if he had not been betrayed by his chilling
scheme, to prefer Louis XL to Louis XII., and to declare that
Louis XL, Ferdinand the Catholic, and Henry VII., were the
' three magi among the kings of the age;' though it be true that
Henry was the least odious of the three royal sages.
" It is due in the strictest justice to Lord Bacon not to omit, that
the history was written to gratify James I., to whom he was then
suing for bitter bread, who revised it, and whom he addressed in
the following words : — 'I have therefore chosen to write the reign
of Henry VIL, who was in a sort your forerunner; and whose
spirit as well as his blood is doubled upon your majesty.' Bacon
had just been delivered from prison : he had passed his sixtieth
year, and was galled by unhonoured poverty. What wonder if
in these circumstances even his genius sunk under such a patron
and such a theme ! " l
1 Lardner's Cyclopaedia, Hist, of England, vol. ii. p. 362.
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 23
Now setting aside for the present the general ques-
tion as to the spirit in which history ought to be writ-
ten, and the particular question as to the spirit in
which this history is written, upon both which points I
shall have a word to say presently, let us first consider
the more positive and definite imputations contained in
the foregoing passage. That Bacon wrote the book to
gratify James ; that in order to gratify James he rep-
resented Henry as a model of king-craft ; and that
the systematic purpose of so representing Henry as a
model of king-craft " distorted character and events ; "
— this is what the charge amounts to. And it is
important to know how far it is true. For if it were
so, to set about detecting and rectifying historical in-
accuracies would be a mere waste of time and a mis-
taking of the proper duty of an editor. In that case
the book as a history would be merely worthless. It
would be curious only as a record of Bacon's idea —
or rather of what he supposed to be James's idea —
of a model king, and should be treated accordingly.
It seems to me however that the hypothesis is not
only uncalled for, but utterly untenable.
That he " wrote the book to gratify James I." is
indeed in one sense true enough. He wanted to do
some service which James would appreciate, and he
knew that a good history of so important a reign was
one of the best services he could perform, and one the
most certain to be appreciated. But it is plain that
Sir J. Mackintosh meant something more than this ;
and if he meant, as I presume he did, that Bacon
chose the subject because it gave him an opportunity for
flattering James, — I would first ask, why anybody
should think so? Is it not the very same subject
24 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
which at least fifteen years before he had wished some
one else to undertake for the simple purpose of supply-
ing a main defect in our national literature ? 1 Did
not the defect still remain ? And was he not now at
leisure to undertake the subject himself? Why then
seek any further for his motive in choosing it ?
But suppose he did choose the subject for the pur-
pose of flattering James, how did he propose to treat
it, so as to produce that effect ? By setting up Henry
the Seventh (we are told) as the model of a king !
Now Henry was in his entire character and in all his
ways, both as a man and as a king, the very contrast
and opposite to James himself. Both indeed professed
to love peace ; and both were constant, without being
uxorious, to their wives. But there the resemblance
ends. In all other respects, to set up either as the
model of what a king should be is little less than to
point out the other as the model of what a king should
not be. Neither was this a difficulty inherent in the
subject. For however obvious and ineffaceable those
features of Henry's character may appear to us, which
mark him as so peculiarly the opposite of James, we
are to remember that we read it by the light which
Bacon himself threw upon it ; that it was Bacon him-
self who brought them to light, — brought them to
light in this very history for the first time. Henry's
character as drawn by preceding historians might have
been used for purposes of flattery well enough. u He
was a Prince," says Stowe, reporting the substance,
1 See his " Letter to the Lord Chancellor touching a History of Brit-
ain;" the original of which, preserved at Bridgwater House, is dated
2 April, 1605. — Collier's Descriptive Catalogue, p. 17. See also Ad-
vancement of Learning, the Second Book, paragraph 5.
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 25
without the flourishes, of what he found in Hall and
Polydore, " of marvellous wisdom, policy, justice, tem-
perance, and gravity, and notwithstanding many and
great occasions of trouble and war he kept his realm
in ri,ght good order, for the which he was greatly rev-
erenced of foreign princes." Such a passage would
have been a very fair foundation in fact for a fancy-
portrait of a great and wise king. A man combining
in himself all the cardinal virtues and reigning in
a continued succession of victorious achievements in
peace and war (so history reported him) might easily
by a less skilful hand than Bacon's, using a very little
of the novelist's or rhetorician's licence, have been
turned into a handsome likeness of James — or of any-
body else. And who can believe that if Bacon had
been really studying, not to draw the man as he was,
but to produce such a representation of him as should
seem to reflect honour upon his descendant, he would
have introduced into the portrait those traits of cold-
ness, reserve, suspicion, avarice, parsimony, party-
spirit, partiality in the administration of justice when
he was himself interested, finesse which was not policy,
strength of will which blinded judgment, closeness and
darkness which bred danger ; — traits which are now
inextricably interwoven with our idea of the man ; but
for traces of which the pages of Fabyan, of Polydore
Vergil, of Hall, of Holinshed, and of Stowe, will be
searched in vain ? If it were necessary to believe that
in introducing such features into the portrait he was
thinking to gratify James at all, we must suppose that
it was not by raising Henry to an ideal eminence
which did not belong to him, but by degrading him
from that ideal eminence which he enjoyed ; and there-
26 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
by relieving the reigning Solomon from his great rival
for that title. But the thing seems to me altogether
incredible.
If it be urged on the other hand that the character
of Henry as interpreted by Bacon, however unlike it
may be to James, is not so unlike Bacon himself ; and
that he was therein delineating his own ideal ; it is
enough to say that many of the peculiarities which he
detects and points out in Henry's mind and ways, are
noticed as weaknesses and errors, derogatory to his
judgment and injurious to his fortunes. Many of his
difficulties, for instance, are attributed to the shortness
of his foresight, which prevented him from seeing dis-
tant dangers in time to prevent them. Who can sup-
pose that that entered into Bacon's idea of a politic
king ? His " settled determination to depress all em-
inent persons of the house of York," might perhaps,
upon Machiavel's principle that in order to secure
a conquest it is necessary to extirpate the reigning
family, have been reconciled with the proposed ideal.
But Bacon expressly notices it as an error in his
policy arising from a weakness in his mind ; and the
cause in fact of almost all his troubles. The severity
of his exactions again is excused by Polydore Vergil
as a politic art to keep turbulent subjects in obedience.
Bacon imputes it to a vice of his nature in coveting to
accumulate treasure, and represents it as procuring him
the hatred of his people to such a degree that his state
was insecure even in the height of his felicity. In the
matter of Brittany, Bacon represents him as outwitted
by the French king : and how ? not (as Polydore
would have it) from reposing too much trust in the
promises of his confederates ; but simply because the
THE KEIGN OF HENRY VII. 27
French king understood the case, and he did not. His
system of secret espionage is indeed justified, as neces-
sary to protect him against secret machinations ; but
the darkness and closeness with which he conducted all
his affairs is censured, as creating general diffidence
and alarm which bred danger. His discountenancing
of the nobility, which has been regarded by some his-
torians as a stroke of profound policy to which the sub-
sequent settlement of the kingdom was chiefly owing,
is considered by Bacon " as one of the causes of his
troublesome reign." And generally the many dif-
ficulties with which he had to contend are expressly
mentioned as not inherent in the case, but as the con-
sequence of " some grand defects and main errors in
his nature, customs, or proceedings." Nay, the sum
total of his achievements is evidently regarded by
Bacon as hardly worthy of him ; and the short-coming
is ascribed not to any want of opportunity or untow-
ardness of fortune, but to a deficiency in himself, —
a deficiency fatal to all heroic pretensions, — a want
of worthier aims. " If the king (he says) did no
greater matters, it was long of himself; for what he
minded he compassed." Who can suppose that in
such a representation he meant " to convey a theory
of king-craft and the likeness of its ideal model " ?
But we are told that he almost owns as much him-
self— " almost avows an intention of embodying in the
person of his hero too much of the ideal conception "
&c. &c. Where such an avowal is to be found we are
not informed ; and I cannot myself discover any pas-
sage in which he speaks of what he intends to do.
When he speaks of what he has done, he certainly
makes an avowal of a very different kind. " I have
28 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
not flattered him " (he says in his dedicatory letter),
" but took him to the life, as well as I could, sitting so
far off and having no better light." And certainly
this is the short and true account of the whole matter.
Whoever will take the trouble to compare this history
with those that went before, will be convinced that the
portrait of Henry is a true study from nature, and one
of the most careful, curious, and ingenious studies of
the kind ever produced. It is important too that this
should be understood ; because upon this it is that the
main interest of the work depends. For it must be
confessed that Henry's reign, though entertaining from
the bustle and variety of incidents, and important for
some of its results, includes but few matters which for
themselves are much worth remembering. The sub-
jects of all those negotiations and treaties retain no
interest for us. The wars and the warriors have alike
passed and left no trace. The story of Perkin War-
beck has the interest only of a great romance. The
laws did indeed print their footsteps deeper ; but the
progress of knowledge and the changes of time have
gone over them too, and they remain only as curiosi-
ties of the past. But as the memory runs back along
the surface of English history from the last of the
Georges to the first of the Plantagenets, the reign of
Henry the Seventh still presents one conspicuous ob-
ject; — an example of a king who was also prime
minister ; a king, not indeed of ideal wisdom or virtue,
but yet of rare sagacity, industry, and courage, who for
twenty-three years really governed the country by his
own wit and his own will. Bacon has accordingly
treated the history of his reign as a history of the
administration of affairs in England from 1485 to
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 29
1509, and represented Henry as what he really was
during all that time, the sole and real minister, con-
ducting in person the affairs of each several depart-
ment.
In what spirit he has executed the work, what kind
of moral impression the narrative is made to suggest, is
a question difficult to answer, because different readers
will be differently affected by it. I would only say
that those readers who, like Sir James Mackintosh,
rise from the perusal of the narrative full of passion-
ate pity for the oppressed, and resentment against the
oppressor so vehement that it overflows even upon the
innocent historian whose faithful report has excited it,
are the last persons who ought to complain of the
writer for telling his story in such a way as not to pro-
duce such impressions. If strong disapprobation and
dislike of Henry be the feeling which his history prop-
erly written ought to excite, there is scarcely a writer
that has touched the subject since who may not be
called as an unconscious witness that Bacon's history
has in that respect done its office. We do not blame a
painter for flattery because he does not write under his
picture " this is the portrait of an ugly man ; " enough
if he paints him as he sees him. Why blame a histo-
rian because, content with describing his hero as he
is, he abstains from calling him names ?
Passing from the particular to the general question,
there is no doubt a real and considerable difference
between Bacon's conception of the proper office of his-
tory and Mackintosh's. According to Bacon, " it is
the true office of history to represent the events them-
selves, together with the counsels ; and to leave the
observations and conclusions thereupon to the liberty
30 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
and faculty of every man's judgment." * According
to Mackintosh, history so written " loses the interest
which bestows on it the power of being useful : " it
must " maintain its sway " by inspiring feelings of pity,
anger, &c.
Now that the reader, in order to derive any benefit
from history, must feel as he reads, Bacon I suppose
would not have denied ; but he would have said that
the reader should be able to feel without being told
when and how ; that when an object of emotion is
truly represented to a capable mind, the emotion will
follow of itself; that a man who is affected by the
sight of good and bad in nature, will be affected in the
same way when he sees them in a book ; that if he be
not, it is for want not of epithets and exclamations and
notes of admiration in the history, but of moral sen-
sibility in himself, and he should be referred to the
preacher or moralist for his cure before he comes to
the secular historian. The duty of the historian,
being first of all to set forth the truth of the case upon
which judgment is to pass, bears a very close analogy
to the duty of the judge in summing up. The sum-
ming up of the judge is truly the history of the case ;
it is meant not only to inform the jury as to the facts,
but also to guide their judgment. Now we see that in
performing this part of his duty the judge is expected
carefully to abstain from all expressions which address
themselves to the feelings of the jury as distinguished
from their judgment ; which are calculated " to inspire
pity for the sufferer, anger against the oppressor, or
earnest desires for the triumph of right over might."
The common sense of Englishmen (guided in this case
i Adv. of Learn, the Second Book, paragraph 7.
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 31
more perhaps than in any other by real earnestness
and sincerity) has established this as a rule ; the clear
purposes of justice manifestly requiring that such feel-
ings should not be allowed to mix with the considera-
tion of the case, but be left to follow the judgment ;
as (if the case be truly judged) they inevitably will.
And the historian would do well to remember, what-
ever his personal feelings may be, that his is the part,
not of the counsel on either side, but (as I said) of the
judge when he is expounding the case to the jury so
that they may be best able to come to a just opinion
on it.
Or if this example be objected to as not strictly
parallel, (because the purposes of justice are satisfied
if the jury come to a correct opinion as to the fact,
whereas the purposes of history require that a correct
opinion as to the fact should be followed by just feel-
ings as to the right and the wrong,) and if an example
be called for of some real history maintaining its
proper sway over the reader's feelings without the aid
of epithets, exclamations, or comments to direct and
stimulate his sensibility ; it is enough to say that in
that book which all who profess and call themselves
Christians are bound to acknowledge as the highest
authority, the most odious of all treasons, the most
unjust of all judgments, the most pathetic of all tales
of martyred innocence, is related four times over with-
out a single indignant comment or a single vitupera-
tive expression.
I have dwelt on these points longer perhaps than I
need have done in so plain a case. But the error of
supposing that Bacon's history was written to flatter
Henry has done much mischief. Almost all our mod-
32 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
ern historians, in trying to correct the supposed flat-
tery, have in fact spoiled the likeness, and so in effect
blotted out of that chapter of our history the very
thing which was most memorable in it.
In speaking of the character of Henry as described
by the writers who preceded Bacon, it will be seen
that I have quoted Stowe, and said nothing of Speed,
whose history was published in 1609, some years after
Stowe's death. But the truth is, that though Bacon's
history of Henry's reign was not written till 1621,
he had drawn up a slight sketch of Henry's character
many years before, of which Speed had a copy, and
knew the value and made the right use. He quotes
it at the outset of his history of this reign ; " being
fit," as he says, " to be set in front to his actions, as
certain lights of the mind by which to discern the
fountain of counsels and causes." As far therefore as
the character of Henry is concerned, and so much of
the interpretation of his actions as depends upon a
true insight into his character, Speed is not to be
reckoned among the historians who preceded Bacon.
The sketch I speak of concludes a short historical
fragment, entitled, The History of the reigns of K.
Henry the VIII, K. Edward, Q. Mary, and part of Q.
Elizabeth, of which there is a fair MS. in the Har-
leian collection (532. fo. 45.) The name of the
writer is not given ; but, even without Speed's au-
thority, who quotes it as " fragm. MS. of Sr. Fr.
B." there would, be no doubt whatever that it is
Bacon's. It was afterwards printed, very inaccurately,
in the Cabala, Ed. 1663, p. 254., but without any
suspicion as to the author ; and it is rather singular
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 66
that, being extant in so common a book, it has never
been claimed or noticed by any of Bacon's numerous
editors and commentators. It contains indeed little
that may not be found elsewhere in his works, yet like
all his other fragments and rudiments it is well worth
preserving ; and there is no fitter place for it than
at the end of this preface. It was written, it will
be seen, while Elizabeth was still reigning ; and his
intention then was to begin with the accession of
Henry the Eighth, or rather perhaps with a sketch
of the condition in which Henry the Seventh left the
kingdom. The idea of beginning with the accession
of Henry the Seventh occurred to him afterwards in
1605 ; as may be seen by comparing his well known
letter to Lord Chancellor Egerton, which was writ-
ten on the 2nd of April in that year, with the passage
on the same subject in the Advancement of Learning.
The History of the reign of K. Henry the Eighth, K.
Edward, Q. Mary, and part of the reign of Q. Eliz-
abeth.
The books which are written do in their kinds rep-
resent the faculties of the mind of man ; Poesy his
imagination ; Philosophy his reason ; and History his
memory. Of which three faculties least exception is
commonly taken to memory ; because imagination
is oftentimes idle, and reason litigious. So likewise
History of all writings deserveth least taxation, as
that which holdeth least of the author, and most of
the things themselves. Again, the use which it
holdeth to man's life, if it be not the greatest, yet
assuredly is the freest from any ill accident or quality.
34 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
For those which are conversant much in poets, as
they attain to great variety, so withal they become
conceited ; and those that are brought up in philoso-
phy and sciences do wax (according as their nature
is) some of them too stiff and opinionate, and some
others too perplexed and confused. Whereas History
possesseth the mind of the conceits which are • nearest
allied unto action, and imprinteth them so, as it doth
not alter the complexion of the mind neither to irres-
olution nor pertinacity. But this is true, that in no
sort of writings there is a greater distance between
the good and the bad, no not between the most excel-
lent poet and the vainest rhymer, nor between the
deepest philosopher and the most frivolous schoolmen,
than there is between good histories and those that
bear the same or the like title. In which regard,
having purposed to write the History of England from
the beginning of the reign of K. Heniy the eighth
of that name near unto the present time wherein Q.
Elizabeth reigneth in good felicity, I am delivered of
the excuse wherewith the best writers of history are
troubled in their proems, when they go about with-
out breaking the bounds of modesty to give a reason
why they should write that again which others have
written well or at least tolerably before. For those
which I am to follow are such as I may rather fear
the reproach of coming into their number, than the
opinion of presumption if I hope to do better than
they. But in the mean time it must be considered,
that the best of the ancient histories were contrived
out of divers particular Commentaries, Relations, and
Narrations, which it was not hard to digest with or-
nament, and thereof to compound one entire Story.
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 35
And as at the first such writers had the ease of other's
labours, so since they have the whole commendation ;
in regard these former writings are for the most part
lost, whereby their borrowings do not appear. But
unto me the disadvantage is great, finding no public
memories of any consideration or worth, in sort that
the supply must be out of the freshness of memory
and tradition, and out of the acts, instruments, and
negotiations of state themselves, together with the
glances of foreign histories ; which though I do ac-
knowledge to be the best originals and instructions out
of which to write an history, yet the travel must be
much greater than if there had been already digested
any tolerable chronicle as a simple narration of the
actions themselves, which should only have needed
out of the former helps to be enriched with the coun-
sels and the speeches and notable particularities. And
this was the reason why I mought not attempt to go
higher to more ancient times, because those helps and
grounds did more and more fail ; although if I be not
deceived I may truly affirm that there have no times
passed over in this nation which have produced greater
actions, nor more worthy to be delivered to the ages
hereafter. For they be not the great wars and con-
quests (which many times are the works of fortune
and fall out in barbarous times) the rehearsal whereof
maketh the profitable and instructing history ; but
rather times refined in policies and industries, new
and rare variety of accidents and alterations, equal
and just encounters of state and state in forces and
of prince and prince in sufficiency, that bring upon
the stage the best parts for observation. Now if you
look into the general natures of the times (which I
36 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
have undertaken) throughout Europe, whereof the
times of this nation must needs participate, you shall
find more knowledge in the world than was in the
ages before, whereby the wits of men (which are the
shops wherein all actions are forged) are more fur-
nished and improved. Then if you shall restrain
your consideration to the state of this monarchy, first
there will occur unto you changes rare, and altogether
unknown to antiquity, in matters of religion and the
state ecclesiastical. Then to behold the several reigns,
of a king that first, or next the first, became abso-
lute in the sovereignty : of a king in minority : of a
queen married to a foreigner: and lastly of a queen
that hath governed without the help either of a mar-
riage, or of any mighty man of her blood : is no small
variety in the affairs of a monarchy, but such as per-
haps in four successions in any state at any time is
hardly to be found. Besides there have not wanted
examples1 within the compass of the same times
neither of an usurpation, nor of rebellions under heads
of greatness, nor of commotions merely popular, nor
of sundry desperate conspiracies (an unwonted thing
in hereditary monarchies), nor of foreign wars of all
sorts; invasive, repulsive of invasion, open and de-
clared, covert and underhand, by sea, by land, Scot-
tish, French, Spanish, succors, protections, new and
extraordinary kinds of confederacies with subjects.
Generally without question the state of this nation
never had a larger reach to import the universal
affairs of Europe; as that which was in the former
part of the time the counterpoise between France
and Spain, and in the latter the only encounter and
i This -word is omitted in the MS. and supplied from the Cabala.
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 37
opposition against Spain. Add hereunto the new dis-
coveries and navigations abroad, the new provisions
of laws and precedents of state at home, and the acci-
dents memorable both of state and of court ; and
there will be no doubt but the times which I have
chosen are of all former times of this nation [the
fittest1] to be registered ; if it be not in this respect,
that they be of too fresh memory, which point I
know very well will be a prejudice, as if this story
were written in favour of the time present. But it
shall suffice unto me, without betraying mine own
name and memory or the liberty of a history, to pro-
cure this commendation to the time with posterity,
namely, that a private man living in the same time
should not doubt to publish an history of the time
which should not carry any show or taste at all of
flattery ; a point noted for an infallible demonstration
of a good time.
King Henry, the seventh of that name, after he had
lived about fifty-two years, and thereof reigned twenty-
three and some months, deceased of a consumption the
22nd day of April, in the palace which he had built
at Ritchemount, in the year of our Redemption 1509.2
This king attained unto the crown, not only from a
private fortune, which mought endow him with mod-
eration, but also from the fortune of an exiled man,
which had quickened in him all seeds of observation
and industry. His times were rather prosperous than
calm, for he was assailed with many troubles, which
1 These words are supplied from the Cabala.
2 Both the MS. and the copy in the Cabala have 1504: an error prob-
ably of the transcriber : 4 carelessly written being very like 9.
38 PREFACE TO THE HISTORY OF
he overcame happily ; a matter that did no less set
forth his wisdom than his fortune ; and yet such a
wisdom as seemed rather a dexterity to deliver himself
from dangers when they pressed him, than any deep
foresight to prevent them afar off. Jealous he was
over the greatness of his Nobility, as remembering
how himself was set up. And much more did this
humour increase in him after he had conflicted with
such idols and counterfeits as were Lambert Symnell
and Perkin Warbeck : the strangeness of which dan-
gers made him think nothing safe. Whereby he wta
forced to descend to the employment of secret espials
and suborned conspirators, a necessary remedy against
so dark and subtle practices ; and not to be repre-
hended, except it were true which some report, that
he had intelligence with confessors for the revealing
of matters disclosed in confession. And yet if a man
compare him with the kings his concurrents in France
and Spain, he shall find him more politic than Lewis
the Twelfth of France, and more entire and sincere
than Ferdinando of Spain, upon whom notwithstand-
ing he did handsomely bestow the envy of the death
of Edward Plantagenet, Earl of Warwick. Great
and devout reverence he bare unto religion, as he that
employed ecclesiastical men in most of his affairs and
negotiations ; and as he that was brought hardly and
very late to the abolishing of the privilege of sanctu-
aries in case of treason, and that not before he had
obtained it by way of suit from Pope Alexander ;
which sanctuaries nevertheless had been the forges of
most of his troubles. In his government he was led
by none, scarcely by his laws, and yet he was a great
observer of formality in all his proceedings, which
THE REIGN OF HENRY VII. 39
notwithstanding was no impediment to the working
of his will ; and in the suppressing and punishing of
the treasons which during the whole course of his
reign were committed against him, he had a very-
strange kind of interchanging of very large and un-
expected pardons with severe executions ; which (his
wisdom considered) could not be imputed to any
inconstancy or inequality, but to a discretion, or at
least to a principle that he had apprehended, that it
was good not obstinately to pursue one course, but to
try both ways. In his wars, he seemed rather confi-
dent than enterprising, by which also commonly he
was not the poorer ; but generally he did seem inclin-
able to live in peace, and made but offers of war to
mend the conditions of peace ; and in the quenching
of the commotions of his subjects he was ever ready
to achieve those wars in person, sometimes reserving
himself, but never retiring himself, but as ready to
second. Of nature he coveted to accumulate treasure,
which the people (into whom there is infused for the
preservation of monarchies a natural desire to dis-
charge their princes, though it be with the unjust
charge of their counsellors and ministers,) did impute
unto Cardinal Morton and Sir Reignold Bray, who
(as it after appeared) as counsellors of ancient au-
thority with him, did so second his humour as they
tempered and refrained it. Whereas Empson and
Dudley that followed (being persons that had no rep-
utation with him, otherwise than the servile following
of his own humour) gave him way and shaped him
way to those extremities, wherewith himself was
touched with remorse at his death, and which his
successor disavowed. In expending of treasure he
40 PREFACE TO HIST. OF REIGN OF HENRY VII.
never spared charge that his affairs required, and in
his foundations was magnificent enough, but his re-
wards were very limited ; so that his liberality was
rather upon his own state and memory than towards
the deserts of others. He chose commonly to employ
cunning persons, as he that knew himself sufficient to
make use of their uttermost reaches, without danger
of being abused with them himself.
Here the MS., which is in a fair Roman hand, care-
fully written and punctuated, ends in the middle of
the page, without any remark, and without any ap-
pearance of being finished, — just as if the transcriber
had left off at the end of a sentence, intending to go
on. I have no reason however to suppose that Bacon
proceeded any further with the work. His increasing
business as a lawyer, and perhaps also an increasing
apprehension of the magnitude of his undertakings in
philosophy, led him probably to relinquish it. The
fragment remains however to show that his conception
of the character of Henry in all its principal features
was formed in his earlier life and under another sover-
eign ; and therefore if it stands in need of excuse, we
must seek for it elsewhere than in the circumstances
suggested by Sir James Mackintosh. For my own
part, I am satisfied with the conjecture that he thought
it the true conception.
THE
HISTORIE OF THE EAIGNE
KING HENRY THE SEVENTH
WRITTEN BY THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
FRANCIS LORD VERULAM, VISCOUNT ST. ALBAN.
LONDON :
Printed by W. Stansby, for Matthew Lownes and William Barret.
1622.
MOST ILLUSTRIOUS AND MOST EXCELLENT PRINCE
CHARLES,
PK1NCE OF WALES, DUKE OF CORNWALL, EARL OF CHESTER,
ETC.
It may please your Highness,
In part of my acknowledgment to your
Highness, I have endeavoured to do honour to the
memory of the last King of England that was ances-
tor to the King your father and yourself; and was
that King to whom both Unions may in a sort refer :
that of the Roses being in him consummate, and that
of the Kingdoms by him begun. Besides, his times
deserve it. For he was a wise man, and an excellent
King ; and yet the times were rough, and full of
mutations and rare accidents. And it is with times
as it is with ways. Some are more up-hill and down-
hill, and some are more flat and plain ; and the one
is better for the liver, and the other for the writer.
I have not flattered him, but took him to life as well
as I could, sitting so far off, and having no better
light. It is true, your Highness hath a living pattern,
incomparable, of the King your father. But it is not
amiss for you also to see one of these ancient pieces.
God preserve your Highness.
Your Highness's most humble
and devoted servant,
FRANCIS ST. ALBAN.
HISTORY OF THE REIGN
OF
KING HENRY THE SEVENTH
After that Richard, the third of that name, king
in fact only, but tyrant both in title and regiment, and
so commonly termed and reputed in all times since,
was by the Divine Revenge, favouring the design of
an exiled man, overthrown and slain at Bosworth
Field ; * there succeeded in the kingdom the Earl of
Richmond, thenceforth styled Henry the Seventh.
The King immediately after the victory, as one that
had been bred under a devout mother, and was in his
nature a great observer of religious forms, caused Te
deum laudamus to be solemnly sung in the presence of
the whole army upon the place, and was himself with
general applause and great cries of joy, in a kind of
militar 2 election or recognition, saluted King. Mean-
while the body of Richard after many indignities and
reproaches (the dirigies and obsequies of the common
1 August 22nd, 1485.
2 Militar is the reading of the original edition: and is the form of the
word which Bacon always, I believe, employed. He sometimes spells it
militare, sometimes militar, but I think never militarie.
46 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
people towards tyrants) was obscurely buried. For
though the King of his nobleness gave charge unto
the friars of Leicester to see an honourable interment
to be given to it, yet the religious people themselves
(being not free from the humours of the vulgar)
neglected it; wherein nevertheless they did not then
incur any man's blame or censure. No man think-
ing any ignominy or contumely unworthy of him, that
had been the executioner of King Heniy the Sixth
(that innocent Prince) with his own hands ; the con-
triver of the death of the Duke of Clarence, his
brother ; the murderer of his two nephews (one of
them his lawful King in the present, and the other
in the future, failing of him) ; and vehemently sus-
pected to have been the impoisoner of his wife, there-
by to make vacant his bed for a marriage within the
degrees forbidden.1 And although he were a Prince
in militar virtue approved, jealous of the honour of
the English nation, and likewise a good law-maker
for the ease and solace of the common people ; yet
his cruelties and parricides in the opinion of all men
weighed down his virtues and merits ; and in the
opinion of wise men, even those virtues themselves
were conceived to be rather feigned and affected
things to serve his ambition, than true qualities in-
generate in his judgment or nature. And therefore
it was noted by men of great understanding (who
seeing his after-acts looked back upon his former pro-
ceedings) that even in the time of King Edward his
brother he was not without secret trains and mines
, to turn envy and hatred upon his brother's govern-
1 i. e. with Elizabeth, eldest daughter of Edward IV. The Latin trans-
lation has incestuosas cum nepti nuplias.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 47
ment ; as having an expectation and a kind of divina-
tion, that the King, by reason of his many disorders,
could not be of long life, but was like to leave his
sons of tender years ; and then he knew well how easy
a step it was from the place of a Protector and first
Prince of the blood to the Crown. And that out
of this deep root of ambition it sprang, that as well at
the treaty of peace that passed between Edward the
Fourth and Lewis the Eleventh of France, concluded
by interview of both Kings at Piqueny, as upon all
other occasions, Richard, then Duke of Gloucester,
stood ever upon the side of honour,1 raising his own
reputation to the disadvantage of the King his brother,
and drawing the eyes of all (especially of the nobles
and soldiers) upon himself; as if the King by his vo-
luptuous life and mean marriage were become effemi-
nate, and less sensible of honour and reason of state
than was fit for a King. And as for the politic and
wholesome laws which were enacted in his time, they
were interpreted to be but the brocage of an usurper,2
thereby to woo and win the hearts of the people, as
being conscious to himself that the true obligations of
sovereignty3 in him failed and were wanting. But
King Henry, in the very entrance of his reign and
the instant of time when the kingdom was cast into
his arms, met with a point of great difficulty and knot-
ty to solve, able to trouble and confound the wisest
King in the newness of his estate ; and so much the
more, because it could not endure a deliberation, but
1 Pacem pro viribus impugnasset, et a parte honoris stetisset.
2 Jnescationes et lenocinia : baits and panderings.
8 Verum obedientice subditorum vinculum : jits scilicet ad regnum legiti-
mum ; the true bond which secures the obedience of subjects — a right to
the throne.
48 HISTOKY OF KING HENRY VII.
must be at once deliberated and determined. There
were fallen to his lot, and concurrent in his person,
three several titles to the imperial crown. The first,
the title of the Lady Elizabeth, with whom, by prece-
dent pact 1 with the party that brought him in, he was
to marry. The second, the ancient and long disputed
title (both by plea and arms) of the house of Lancas-
ter, to which he was inheritor in his own person.2
The third, the title of the sword or conquest, for that
he came in by victory of battle, and that the king in
possession was slain in the field. The first of these
was fairest, and most like to give contentment to the
people, who by two-and-twenty years reign of King
Edward the Fourth had been fully made capable 3 of
the clearness of the title of the White Rose or house
of York ; and by the mild 4 and plausible reign of the
same King towards his latter time, were become af-
fectionate to that line. But then it lay plain before
his eyes, that if he relied upon that title, he could be
but a King at courtesy, and have rather a matrimonial
than a regal power ; the right remaining in his Queen,
upon whose decease, either with issue or without issue,
1 Such pact implying that it was in her right he should reign ; as is
more fully expressed in the Latin translation. " Primus erat tilulus
reginas sum Elizabethm : cut etiam accesserat pactum illud, quo se proceribus
quorum auxiliis regnum adeplus est obstrinxerat, de nuptiis cum ilia contra-
kendis, quod ilium in jure ejus regnaturum haud obscure subinnuebaV
2 In the Latin translation this expression is materially qualified. Qua-
rum alteri, Lancastrian scilicet, ipse se pro hmrede gerebat : to which he
considered himself as heir.
8 Opinionem penitus imbiberant.
4 Sir T. Meautys, in a letter to Bacon of 7th Jan. 1621-2, mentions, as
one of the verbal corrections made in the MS. by the King, " mild instead
of debonnaire." This is probably the place. Compare the expression
in Perkin's proclamation further on, " the blessed and debonair govern-
ment of our noble father King Edward in his last times."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 49
he was to give place and be removed. And though
he should obtain by Parliament to be continued,1 yet
he knew there was a very great difference between a
King that holdeth his crown by a civil act of estates,
andone that holdeth it originally by the law of nature
and descent of blood. Neither wanted there even at
that time secret rumours and whisperings, (which after-
wards gathered strength and turned to great troubles)
that the two young sons of King Edward the Fourth,
or one of them, (which were said to be destroyed in
the Tower,) were not indeed murdered but conveyed
secretly away, and were yet living: which, if it had
been true, had prevented the title of the Lady Eliza-
beth. On the other side, if he stood upon his own
title of the house of Lancaster, inherent in his person,
he knew it was a title condemned by Parliament, and
generally prejudged in the common opinion of the
realm, and that it tended directly to the disinherison
of the line of York, held then the indubiate 2 heirs of
the crown. So that if he should have no issue by the
Lady Elizabeth, which should be descendants of the
double line, then3 the ancient flames of discord and
intestine wars, upon the competition of both houses,
would again return and revive.
As for conquest, notwithstanding Sir William Stan-
ley, after some acclamations of the soldiers in the field,
had put a crown of ornament 4 (which Richard wore
in the battle and was found amongst the spoils) upon
1 Licet magna spes subesset quod comitiorum suffragiis regnum in persona
sua durante vita sua continuare et stabilire posset.
2 So in original.
8 The original edition has when, which is manifestly wrong.
4 Non imperialem Mam, sed quam omamenti et ominis causa Ricardus
secum in helium attulerat.
50 HISTOEY OF KING HENRY VII.
King Henry's head, as if there Avere his chief title ;
yet he remembered well upon what conditions and
agreements he was brought in ; and that to claim as
conqueror was to put as well his own party as the rest
into terror and fear ; as that which gave him power of
disannulling of laws, and disposing of men's fortunes
and estates, and the like points of absolute power
being in themselves so harsh and odious, as that Wil-
liam himself, commonly called the Conqueror, howso-
ever he used and exercised the power of a conqueror
to reward his Normans, yet he forbare to use that
claim in the beginning,1 but mixed it with a titulary
pretence, grounded upon the will and designation of
Edward the Confessor. But the King, out of the
greatness of his own mind, presently cast the die ;
and the inconveniences appearing unto him on all
parts, and knowing there could not be any interreign
or suspension of title, and preferring his affection to
his own line and blood, and liking2 that title best
which made him independent, and being in his nature
and constitution of mind not very apprehensive or
forecasting of future events afar off, but an entertainer
of fortune by the day, resolved to rest upon the title
of Lancaster as the main, and to use the other two,
that of marriage and that of battle, but as supporters,
the one to appease secret discontents, and the other to
beat down open murmur and dispute ; not forgetting
that the same title of Lancaster had formerly main-
tained a possession of three descents in the crown ;
1 Verbo tamen abstinuerit, neque hoc jure se regnum tenere unquam pro-
fessus sit, sed Mud titulari quodam prcetextu velaverit.
2 In the translation it is put thus: Sive amori ergafamiliam worn reliqua
posthdbens. sive tfc.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 51
and might have proved a perpetuity, had it not ended
in the weakness and inability of the last prince.
Whereupon the King presently that very day, being
the two and twentieth of August, assumed the style
or King in his own name, without mention of the
Lady Elizabeth at all, or any relation thereunto. In
which course he ever after persisted : which did spin
him a thread of many seditions and troubles. The
King, full of these thoughts, before his departure from
Leicester, despatched Sir Robert Willoughby to the
castle of Sheriff-Hutton, in Yorkshire, where were kept
in safe custody, by King Richard's commandment,
both the Lady Elizabeth, daughter of King Edward,1
and Edward Plantagenet, son and heir to George
Duke of Clarence. This Edward was by the King's
warrant delivered from the constable of the castle to
the hand of Sir Robert Willoughby ; and by him
with all safety and diligence conveyed to the Tower
of London, where he was shut up close prisoner.
Which act of the King's (being an act merely of
policy and power) proceeded not so much from any
apprehension he had of Dr. Shaw's tale at Paul's
Cross for the bastarding of Edward the Fourth's
issues, in which case this young gentleman was to
succeed,2 (for that fable was ever exploded,) but upon
a settled disposition to depress all eminent persons of
the line of York. Wherein still the King, out of
strength of will or weakness of judgment, did use to
shew a little more of the party than of the king.
1 Whom he had agreed to marry: — Edvardl Jilia ad nuplias Henrico
dedinata.
2 Proximus fuisset regni hceres : would have been next heir of the
Crown.
52 HISTOEY OF KING HENEY VII.
For the Lady Elizabeth, she received also a direction
to repair with all convenient speed to London, and
there to remain with the Queen dowager her mother ;
which accordingly she soon after did, accompanied
with many noblemen and ladies of honour. In the
mean season the King set forwards by easy journeys
to the City of London, receiving the acclamations and
applauses of the people as he went, which indeed were
true and unfeigned, as might well appear in the veiy
demonstrations and fulness of the cry. For they
thought generally that he was a Prince as ordained
and sent down from heaven to unite and put to an
end the long dissensions of the two houses ; which
although they had had, in the times of Henry the
Fourth, Henry the Fifth, and a part of Henry the
Sixth on the one side, and the times of Edward the
Fourth on the other, lucid intervals and happy pauses ;
yet they did ever hang over the kingdom, ready to
break forth into new perturbations and calamities.
And as his victory gave him the knee, so his purpose
of marriage with the Lady Elizabeth gave him the
heart ; so that both knee and heart did truly bow
before him.
He on the other side with great wisdom (not igno-
rant of the affections and fears of the people), to dis-
perse the conceit and terror of a conquest, had given
order that there should be nothing in his journey like
unto a warlike inarch or manner ; but rather like unto
the progress of a King in full peace and assurance.1
He entered the City upon a Saturday, as he had
also obtained the victory upon a Saturday ; which day
1 Sed potius itineris pacifici, quali reges animi causa provincias suas pera-
grantes uti solent. " Progress " is used in its technical sense.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 53
of the week, first upon an observation, and after upon
memory and fancy, he accounted and chose as a day
prosperous unto him.
.The mayor1 and companies of the City received
him at Shoreditch ; whence with great and honourable
attendance, and troops of noblemen and persons of
quality, he entered the City ; himself not being on
horseback, or in any open chair or throne, but in a
close chariot ; as one that having been sometimes an
enemy to the whole state, and a proscribed person,
chose rather to keep state and strike a reverence into
the people than to fawn upon them.
He went first into St. Paul's Church, where, not
meaning that the people should forget too soon that
he came in by battle, he made offertory of his stand-
ards, and had orizons and Te Deum again sung ; and
went to his lodging prepared in the Bishop of Lon-
don's palace, where he stayed for a time.
During his abode there, he assembled his counsel2
and other principal persons, in presence of whom he
did renew again his promise to marry with the Lady
Elizabeth. This he did the rather, because having at
1 Major in original.
2 In the edition of 1622 this word is in this place spelt counsetl : in other
places it is spelt councell ; which is almost always the spelling of the MS.
According to modern usage it would of course be spelt here council. But
the modern distinction between council and counsel, councillor and counsel-
lor, was not observed in Bacon's time ; at least not marked in the spelling.
Some wrote both words with an s; some both with a c; some either with
either. But the rule by which the several forms of the word are appropri-
ated to its several meanings, — counsel being used for advice, counsellor for
a person who gives advice, council for a board of counsellors, councillor for
a member of such board, — this rule was not yet established ; and as it
sometimes happens that the point or effect of the sentence depends upon
the ambiguity, and is lost by marking the distinction, I have thought it
better to retain the same form in all cases : and I have chosen that form
which represents in modern orthography the original word.
54 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
his coming out of Brittaine given artificially for serv-
ing of his own turn some hopes, in case he obtained
the kingdom, to marry Anne, inheritress to the duchy
of Brittaine, whom Charles the Eighth of France soon
after married, it bred some doubt and suspicion
amongst divers that he was not sincere, or at least
not fixed, in going on with the match of England so
much desired : which conceit also, though it were but
talk and discourse, did much afflict the poor Lady
Elizabeth herself. But howsoever he both truly in-
tended it, and desired also it should be so believed
(the better to extinguish envy and contradiction to
his other purposes), yet was he resolved in himself
not to proceed to the consummation thereof, till his
coronation and a Parliament were past. The one,
lest a joint coronation of himself and his Queen might
give any countenance of participation of title ; the
other, lest in the entailing of the crown to himself,
which he hoped to obtain by Parliament, the votes
of the Parliament might any ways reflect upon her.
About this time in autumn, towards the end of
September, there began and reigned in the city and
other parts of the kingdom a disease then new ; *
which by the accidents and manner thereof they
called the sweating-sickness. This disease had a swift
course, both in the sick body and in the time and
period of the lasting thereof.2 For they that were
taken with it, upon four-and-twenty hours, escaping
were thought almost assured. And as to the time of
the malice and reign of the disease ere it ceased, it
1 Morbus qiddam epidemicus, tunc temporis novus ; cui ex naturd et symp-
tojnatibus ejus, cf c.
2 Tarn in morbi ipsius crisi, quam in tempore dwationis ipsius.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 55
began about the one and twentieth of September, and
cleared up before the end of October; insomuch as
it was no hinderance to the King's coronation, which
was- the last of October ; nor (which was more) to
the holding of the Parliament, which began but seven
days after. It was a pestilent fever, but as it seemeth
not seated in the veins or humours ; for that there
followed no carbuncle, no purple or livid spots,1 or
the like, the mass of the body being not tainted ; only
a malign vapour flew to the heart, and seized the vital
spirits ; which stirred nature to strive to send it forth
by an extreme sweat. And it appeared by experience
that this disease was rather a surprise of nature, than
obstinate to remedies, if it were in time looked unto.
For if the patient were kept in an equal temper, both
for clothes, fire, and drink moderately warm, with
temperate cordials, whereby nature's work were neither
irritated by heat nor turned back by cold, he com-
monly recovered. But infinite persons died suddenly
of it, before the manner of the cure and attendance
was known. It was conceived not to be an epidemic
disease,2 but to proceed from a malignity in the con-
stitution of the air, gathered by the predispositions of
seasons ; 3 and the speedy cessation declared as much.
1 The Latin translation adds non pustuke.
2 The word epidemic is mentioned by Sir T. Meautys as one of the ver-
bal corrections made by the King in the original MS. This part of the
MS. is unluckily lost; we cannot therefore ascertain whether this be the
place where that word was introduced, or what the word was for which it
was substituted. Bacon's meaning however is fully explained in the
Latin translation, in which it has already been described as an epidemic
disease. Opinio erat morbum istum neutiquam ex epidemicis Hits qui simul
contagiosi sunt et de corpore in corpus fluunt fuisse : sed a malignitate quadam
in ipso aere, tfc. Using the words in their modern sense, we should say
that it was thought not to be a contagious but an epidemic disease.
« The translation adds " and frequent and unhealthy changes of
weather."
56 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
On Simon and Jude's Even the King dined with
Thomas Bourchier, Archbishop of Canterbury, and
Cardinal : and from Lambeth went by land over the
bridge to the Tower, where the morrow after he made
twelve knights-bannerets. But for creations, he dis-
pensed them with a sparing hand. For notwithstanding
a field so lately fought and a coronation so near at hand,
he only created three : Jasper Earl of Pembroke (the
King's uncle) was created Duke of Bedford ; Thomas
the Lord Stanley (the King's father-in-law) Earl of
Derby ; and Edward Courtney Earl of Devon ; though
the king had then nevertheless a purpose in himself to
make more in time of Parliament ; bearing a wise
and decent respect to distribute his creations, some to
honour his coronation, and some his Parliament.
The coronation followed two days after, upon the
thirtieth day of October in the year of our Lord 1485.
At which time Innocent the Eighth was Pope of
Rome ; Frederick the Third Emperor of Almain ;
and Maximilian his son newly chosen King of the
Romans ; Charles the Eighth King of France ; Fer-
dinando and Isabella Kings of Spain ; and James the
Third King of Scotland : with all of which kings and
states the King was at that time in good peace and
amity.1 At which day also (as if the crown upon his
head had put perils into his thoughts) he did institute
for the better security of his person a band of fifty
archers under a captain to attend him, by the name
i There seems to have been a doubt at first how he stood with regard
to Scotland; for on the 25th of September, 1485, commissions were issued
to the Sheriffs of Northumberland, Cumberland, Westmoreland, York-
shire, and Nottingham, " to hold in array the men of those counties in
readiness for an anticipated invasion of the Scots," &c. See Calendar of
Patent Rolls, 1 Hen. VII. Rolls Chapel.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 57
of Yeomen-of-his-Guard : and yet that it might be
thought to be rather a matter of dignity, after the
imitation of that he had known abroad, than any mat-
ter .of diffidence appropriate to his own case, he made
it to be understood for an ordinance not temporary,
but to hold in succession for ever after.
The seventh of November the King held his Par-
liament at Westminster, which he had summoned
immediately after his coming to London. His ends
in calling a Parliament (and that so speedily) were
chiefly three. First, to procure the crown to be
entailed upon himself. Next to have the attainders
of all his party (which were in no small number)
reversed, and all acts of hostility by them done in his
quarrel remitted and discharged ; and on the other
side, to attaint1 by Parliament the heads and princi-
pals of his enemies. The third, to calm and quiet the
fears of the rest of that party by a general pardon ; 2
not being ignorant in how great danger a King stands
from his subjects, when most of his subjects are con-
scious in themselves that they stand in his danger.3
3 In the original it is spelt " attaine; " probably a misprint.
2 This is explained in the translation to mean such a general pardon as
was usual after a Parliament. Ut inferioris conditionis homines qui Ri-
chardo adhceserant (ne forte novis motibus materiam prceberet) remissionem
generalem, qualis in fine comitiorum a rege emanare solet, consequerentur.
The nature of this general pardon is further explained in the Index vocab-
ulorum appended to the translation. It is defined, indulgentia Regis, qua et
crimina omnia [exceptis quae, in instrumento remissionis speciatim recensentur)
et mulctaz, aliceque solutiones Regi debitce, abolentur. And it is added that it
may proceed either from the King alone or from the King and Parliament.
Ilia quandoque a Rege solo emanat, quandoque a Rege addita auctoritate Par-
liamenti. It seems that Henry's first intention was to take the latter
method ; but that he changed his mind. See p. 62.
3 In the MS. the sentence stood originally thus, — "that they stand in
danger from him." The alteration (which I think is no improvement) is
not in the transcriber's hand nor in Bacon's; but apparently in the same
58 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Unto these three special motives of a Parliament was
added, that he as a prudent and moderate prince made
this judgment, that it was fit for him to haste to let
his people see that he meant to govern by law, how-
soever he came in by the sword ; and fit also to re-
claim them to know him for their King, whom they
had so lately talked of as an enemy or banished man.
For that which concerned the entailing of the crown
(more than that he was true to his own will, that he
would not endure any mention of the Lady Elizabeth,
no not in the nature of special entail1), he carried it
otherwise with great wisdom and measure. For he
did not press to have the act penned by way of decla-
ration or recognition of right ; as on the other side
he avoided to have it by new law or ordinance ; but
chose rather a kind of middle way, by way of estab-
lishment, and that under covert and indifferent words ; *
that the inheritance of the crown should rest, remain, and
abide in the King, etc. : which words might equally
be applied, That the crown should continue to him ; 3
but whether as having former right to it (which was
doubtful), or having it then in fact and possession
(which no man denied), was left fair to interpretation
in which the direction with regard to the omitted passage on page 60
is written. I suppose it was one of the verbal corrections dictated by the
King.
From this place to the foot of page 67, I have corrected the text from
the MS. The leaves which preceded are lost.
1 Imo nee quod minimum erat permittens, ut liberi ex ed suscepii priini ante
omnes succederent.
2 Verbis tectis et utringue nutantibus.
8 The meaning is more accurately expressed in the Latin translation:
Quce verba in utrumque sensum trahi poterant ; Mud commune habentia, ut
scilicet corona in eo siabiliretur ; sed utrum, tfc. The words might be taken
two ways ; but either way they must be taken as establishing the crown
upon him.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 59
either way. And again for the limitation of the en-
tail, he did not press it to go farther than to himself
and to the heirs of his body, not speaking of his right
heirs ; 1 but leaving that to the law to decide ; so as
the entail might seem rather a personal favour to him
and his children, than a total disinherison to the house
of York. And in this form was the law drawn and
passed. Which statute he procured to be confirmed
by the Pope's Bull the year following, with mention
nevertheless (by way of recital) of his other titles
both of descent and conquest. So as now the wreath
of three was made a wreath of five. For to the three
first titles, of the two houses or lines and conquest,
were added two more ; the authorities Parliamentary
and Papal.
The King likewise in the reversal of the attainders
of his partakers, and discharging them of all offences
incident to his service and succour, had his will ; and
acts did pass accordingly. In the passage whereof, ex-
ception was taken to divers persons in the House of
Commons, for that they were attainted, and thereby
not legal, nor habilitate to serve in Parliament, being
disabled in the highest degree ; 2 and that it should be
a great incongruity to have them to make laws who
themselves were not inlawed. The truth was, that
divers of those which had in the time of King Richard
been strongest and most declared for the King's party,
1 Omissd hceredum generalium Vientiane, sed Mud legis decisioni, qualis ex
verbis antedictis elici poterat, subjiciebat.
2 This is rather fuller and clearer in the Latin. Cum vero Statutum Mud
essel sub incude, intervenit qucestio juris satis subtilis. Dubitatum est enim,
utrum suffragia complurium in inferiori consessu tunc existentium valida essent
et legitima, eo quod prodilionis tempore Richardi damnati fuissent ; unde inca-
paces et inhabiles redditi essent in summo gradu.
60 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
were returned Knights and Burgesses of the Parlia-
ment ; whether by care or recommendation from the
state, or the voluntary inclination of the people ; many
of which had been by Richard the Third attainted by
outlawries, or otherwise. The King was somewhat
troubled with this. For though it had a grave and
specious show, yet it reflected upon his party. But
wisely not shewing himself at all moved therewith, he
would not understand it but as a case in law, and
wished the judges to be advised thereupon, who for
that purpose were forthwith assembled in the Ex-
chequer-chamber l (which is the counsel-chamber of
the judges), and upon deliberation they gave a grave
and safe opinion and advice, mixed with law and con-
venience ; 2 which was, that the knights and burgesses
attainted by the course of law should forbear to come
into the house till a law were passed for the reversal of
their attainders. [But the judges left it there, and
made no mention whether after such reversal there
should need any new election or no, nor whether this
sequestering of them from the house were generally
upon their disability, or upon an incompetency that
they should be judges and parties in their own cause.
The point in law was, whether any disability in their
natural capacity could trench to their politic capacity,
they being but procurators of the commonwealth and
representatives and fiduciaries of counties and bor-
oughs ; considering their principals stood upright and
1 The index vocabulorum explains, for the benefit of foreigners, that the
exchequer chamber was locus in qiiojudices majores conveniunt ; cum aut a
rege consuluntur ; aut propter vota cequalia in curiis minoribus, omnes dtlibe-
rant et suffragia reddunt ; aut minorum curiarum judicia relractant.
2 Ex legum norma el cequitate naturali temperatam.
HIST OK Y OF KING HENRY VII. 61
clear, and therefore were not to receive prejudice from
their personal attainders.1]
It was at that time incidentally moved amongst the
judges in their consultation, what should be done for
the King himself who likewise was attainted : but it
was with unanimous consent resolved, that the crown
takes away all defects and stops in blood : and that
from the time the King did assume the crown, the
fountain was cleared, and all attainders and corruption
of blood discharged.2 But nevertheless, for honour's
sake, it was ordained by Parliament, that all records
wherein there was any memory or mention of the
King's attainder should be defaced, cancelled, and
taken off the file.
But on the part of the King's enemies there were by
parliament attainted,3 the late Duke of Gloucester,
1 The passage within brackets is taken from the MS.; where it is
crossed out; and against the last sentence is written in the margin, in a
hand which I do not know (not Bacon's, as it is supposed to be by Sir
Frederic Madden, Archaeol. 27, 155), " This to be altered, as his Matie told
Mr. Mewtus."
Mr. Meautys, in a letter to Bacon, 7th Jan. 1621-2, says, M Mr. Murray
tells me that the King hath given your book to my Lord Brooke, and en-
joined him to read it, commending it much to him, and then my Lord
Brooke is to return it to your Lp., and so it may go to the press when your
Lp. please, with such amendments as the King hath made, which I have
seen, and are very few, and these rather words, as epidemic, and mild in-
stead of debonnaire, &c. Only that, of persons attainted enabled to serve
in Parliament by a bare reversal of their attainders without issuing any
new writs, the King by all means will have left out." This is what Lord
Campbell alludes to where he says that James made Bacon " expunge a
legal axiom, ' that on the reversal of an attainder the party attainted is
restored to all his rights.' " — Lives, iii. 122. 4th ed.
2 The translation adds ut Regi opera Parliamentarian non fuissei opus.
8 It is remarkable that in the act of attainder the 21st of August (the
day before the battle of Boswoi-th) is spoken of as being in the first year
of Henry's reign; and that, a few lines further on, the 22nd of August ia
called " the said 22nd day of the said month then following." The expres-
sions are plainly irreconcilable ; but I suppose it is only a clerical error or
62 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
calling himself Richard the Third, the Duke of Nor-
folk, the Earl of Surrey, Viscount Lovell, the Lord
Ferrers, the Lord Zouch, Richard Ratcliffe, William
Catesby, and many others of degree and quality. In
which bilfs of attainders nevertheless there were con-
tained many just and temperate clauses, savings, and
provisoes ; well shewing and fore-tokening the wisdom,
stay, and moderation of the King's spirit of govern-
ment. And for the pardon of the rest that had stood
against the King, the King upon a second advice
thought it not fit it should pass by Parliament,1 the
better (being matter of grace), to impropriate the
thanks to himself: using only the opportunity of a
Parliament time, the better to disperse it into the veins
of the kingdom. Therefore during the Parliament he
published his royal proclamation, oifering pardon and
grace of restitution to all such as had taken arms or
been participant of any attempts against him, so as
they submitted themselves to his mercy by a day, and
took the oath of allegiance and fidelity to him, where-
upon many came out of sanctuary, and many more
a misprint, and that " the said 22nd day of the said month " should have
been " the 22nd day of the said month," &c.
The author of the Pictorial History of England (book vi. cap. i.) thinks
that the date of Henry's accession was thus antedated by a day, because
if he was not king on the 21st, acts done on the 21st could not have been
treason against him. The truth is, it mattered little by what fiction the
law chose to bring within its forms a case in itself so utterly irreconcilable
with law as a successful rebellion against the de facto king. To suppose
that Henry had assumed the crown from the day when he was prepared to
contest it in the field, was perhaps that form of fiction which came nearest
to the truth.
For a fuller account of the discrepant evidence as to the commencement
of Henry's regnal year, see Sir Harris Nicolas's Chronology of History, pp.
328-333.
i A Parliarnentaria auctoritate promanaret. See note 2. p. 57.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 63
I
came out of fear, no less guilty than those that had
taken sanctuary.
As for money or treasure, the King thought it not
seasonable or fit to demand any of his subjects at this
Parliament ; both because he had received satisfaction
from them in matters of so great importance, and be-
cause he could not remunerate them with any general
pardon (being prevented therein by the coronation par-
don passed immediately before) ; but chiefly, for that
it was in every man's eye what great forfeitures and
confiscations he had at that present to help himself;
whereby those casualties of the crown might in reason
spare the purses of the subject ; specially in a time
when he was in peace with all his neighbours. Some
few laws passed at that Parliament, almost for form
sake : amongst which there was one, to reduce aliens
being made denizens to pay strangers' customs ; and
another, to draw to himself the seizures and compo-
sitions of Italians' goods, for not employment ; l being
points of profit to his coffers, whereof from the very
beginning he was not forgetful ; and had been more
happy at the latter end, if his early providence, which
kept him from all necessity of exacting upon his
people, could likewise have attempered his nature
1 L e. for not being employed upon the purchase of native goods ; that
being the condition upon which the importation was allowed.
The Latin translation, being addressed to foreigners, gives a fuller and
more exact description of many of these laws than was then necessary for
English readers. English readers want the explanation now as much as
foreigners ; and therefore I shall in most cases give the Latin words by
way of commentary.
Unafuit, ut exteri licet civitaie donati nihilominus vectigalia qualia imponi
soleni meris exleris solverent : altera, ut mulctxz mercaiorum Italorum propter
pecunias qua, proveniebant ex mercibus suis venundatis in nativas regni merces
non impensas, Jisco regio applicarentur.
64 HISTOKY OF KING HENRY VII.
therein. He added during parliament to his former
creations the ennoblement or advancement in nobility
of a few others. The Lord Chandos of Brittaine was
made Earl of Bath ; Sir Giles Dawbigny was made
Lord Dawbigny ; and Sir Robert Willoughby Lord
Brooke.
The King did also with great nobleness and bounty
(which virtues at that time had their turns in his na-
ture) restore Edward Stafford eldest son to Henry
Duke of Buckingham, attainted in the time of King
Richard, not only to his dignities, but to his fortunes
and possessions, which were great ; to which he was
moved also by a kind of gratitude, for that the Duke
was the man that moved the first stone against the
tyranny of King Richard, and indeed made the King
a bridge to the crown upon his own ruins. Thus the
Parliament brake up.
The Parliament being dissolved, the King sent forth-
with money to redeem the Marquis Dorset and Sir
John Bourchier, whom he had left as his pledges at
Paris for money which he had borrowed when he
made his expedition for England ; and thereupon he
took a fit occasion to send the Lord Treasurer and Mr.
Bray (whom he used as counsellor) to the Lord Mayor
of London, requiring of the City a prest of six thousand
marks. But after many parleys he could obtain but
two thousand pounds ; which nevertheless the King
took in good part, as men use to do that practise to
borrow money when they have no need.
About this time the King called unto his Privy
Counsel John Morton and Richard Foxe, the one
Bishop of Ely, the other Bishop of Exeter ; vigilant
men and secret, and such as kept watch with him al-
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 65
most upon all men else. They had been both versed
in his affairs before he came to the crown, and were
partakers of his adverse fortune. This Morton soon
after, upon the death of Bourchier, he made Arch-
bishop of Canterbury. And for Foxe, he made him
Lord Keeper of his Privy Seal ; and afterwards ad-
vanced him by degrees, from Exeter to Bath and
Wells, thence to Durham, and last to Winchester.
For although the King loved to employ and advance
bishops, because having rich bishoprics they carried
their reward upon themselves ; yet he did use to raise
them by steps ; that he might not lose the profit of
the first fruits,1 which by that course of gradation was
multiplied.
At last upon the eighteenth of January was solem-
nised the so long expected and so much desired marriage
between the King and the Lady Elizabeth ; which day
of marriage was celebrated with greater triumph and
demonstrations (especially on the people's part) of joy
and gladness, than the days either of his entry or coro-
nation ; which the King rather noted than liked. And
it is true that all his life-time, while the Lady Elizabeth
lived with him (for she died before him), he shewed
himself no very indulgent husband2 towards her though
1 i. e. the portion of the profit which he contrived to secure for himself.
The first-fruits at that time went to the Pope, as is noticed in the Latin
translation, which adds, "Licet enim tunc temporis reditus Me ex primitiis
reditibus regiis nonfuisset annexvis, sed tributo papali cesser at ; attamen ipse
ita cum collectoribus Papce se gerere solebat, ut haud parvum inde commodum
sibi redundareV
2 So again farther on : " Towards his queen he was nothing uxorious,
nor scarce indulgent; but companiable and respective, and without jeal-
ousy."
I am not aware that anv evidence is now extant from which it could be
inferred that Henry was wanting in indulgence to his wife; but these
words are evidently chosen with care and delicacy, and we need not
VOL. xi. 5
66 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
she was beautiful gentle and fruitful. But his aversion
toward the house of York was so predominant in him,
doubt that Bacon had good grounds for what he said. These passages
' are, I believe, the sole foundation of the statements made by later histo-
rians on this point; a few of which (to show how little the copy can be
trusted for preserving the characteristic features of the original) it may be
worth while to quote, according to the order of their date. The succes-
sive pictures are not however copies from each other, but all meant to be
copies direct from Bacon.
1 Rapin (a. d. 1707-25). " Henry did not like to see the people's joy
for this marriage. He perceived Elizabeth had a greater share in it than
himself, and consequently he was thought really king only in right of his
queen. This consideration inspired him with such a coldness for her, that
he never ceased giving her marks of it so long as she lived. He deferred her
coronation two whole years, and doubtless would have done so for ever, if
he had not thought it prejudicial to him to persist in refusing her that
honour. Nay perhaps he would have dealt with her as Edward the Confessor
had formerly done by his queen, daughter of Earl Goodwin, had not the desire
of children caused him to overcome his aversion."
2. Hume (1759). "Henry remarked with much displeasure the gen-
eral favour which was borne the house of York. The suspicions which
arose from it not only distui'bed his tranquillity during his whole reign,
but bred disgust towards his spouse herself and poisoned all his domestic enjoy-
ments. Though virtuous, amiable, and obsequious to the last degree, she
never met with a proper return of affection, or even of complaisance, from
her husband; and the malignant ideas of faction still, in his sullen mind,
prevailed over all the sentiments of conjugal tenderness."
3. Henry (1790). " Henry did not relish these rejoicings; on the con-
trary they gave great disgust to his jealous and sullen spirit; as they con-
vinced him that the house of York was still the favourite of the people,
and that his young and beautiful consort possessed a greater share of their
affections than himself. This, it is said, deprived her of the affections of
her husband, who treated her unkindly during her life.*1
4. Thomas Hey wood (Preface to the Song of the Lady Bessy, p. 15.),
(1829). " It was a match of policy; and the gentle and unoffending queen,
after a life rendered miserable by the dislike in which the king held her in
common with the whole of the house of York, and having given birth to
three sons and four daughters, died in the Tower, A. d. 1503, in the 37th
year of her age," &c.
" I have not met " (says Dr. Lingard, after quoting a passage of opposite
tendency) " with any good proof of Henry's dislike of Elizabeth, so often
mentioned by later writers. In the MS. of Andre" and the journals of the
Herald they appear as if they entertained a real affection for each other."
(Vol. v. p. 328.)
If Bacon be, as I suppose he is, the sole authority upon which these
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 67
as it found place not only in his wars and counsels, but
in his chamber and bed.
Towards the middle of the spring,1 the King, full of
confidence and assurance, as a prince that had been
victorious in battle, and had prevailed with his Parlia-
ment in all that he desired, and had the ring of accla-
mations fresh in his ears, thought the rest of his reign
should be but play, and the enjoying of a kingdom.
Yet as a wise and watchful King, he would not neglect
anything for his safety, thinking nevertheless to per-
form all things now rather as an exercise than as a
labour. So he being truly informed that the northern
parts were not only affectionate to the house of York,
but particularly had been devoted to King Richard the
Third, thought it would be a summer well spent to
visit those parts, and by his presence and application
of himself2 to reclaim and rectify those humours. But
the King, in his account of peace and calms, did much
over-cast his fortunes ; which proved for many years
together full of broken seas, tides, and tempests. For
he was no sooner come to Lincoln, where he kept his
Easter, but he received news that the Lord Lovell,
Humphrey Stafford, and Thomas Stafford, who had
formerly taken sanctuary at3 Colchester, were de-
parted out of sanctuary, but to what place no man
could tell. Which advertisement the King despised,
later writers speak, proof was not to be expected. Bacon does not say
that Henry was either neglectful or unkind, but only that he was not very
indulgent.
1 In the Latin, jam autem. Easter-day fell that year on the 26th of
March ; and by that time the king had advanced in his northern progress
as far as Lincoln.
a Prcesentiaque sua, el majeslate simul ac comitate.
8 Several pages of the MS. that followed here are lost.
68 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
and continued his journey to York. At York1 there
came fresh and more certain advertisement that the
Lord Lovell was at hand with a great power of men,
and that the Staffords were in arms in Worcestershire,
and had made their approaches to the city of Worces-
ter to assail it. The King, as a prince of great and
profound judgment, was not much moved with it ; for
that he thought it was hut a rag or remnant of Bos-
worth Field, and had nothing in it of the main party
of the house of York. But he was more doubtful of
the raising of forces to resist the rebels, than of the
resistance itself ; 2 for that he was in a core of people
whose affections he suspected. But the action endur-
ing no delay, he did speedily levy and send against the
Lord Lovell to the number of three thousand men, ill
armed but well assured (being taken some few out of
his own train, and the rest out of the tenants and fol-
lowers of such as were safe to be trusted), under the
conduct of the Duke of Bedford. And as his manner
was to send his pardons rather before the sword than
after, he gave commission to the Duke to proclaim
pardon to all that would come in: which the Duke,
upon his approach to the Lord Lovell's camp, did per-
form. And it fell out as the King expected ; the her-
alds were the great ordnance. For the Lord Lovell,
upon proclamation of pardon, mistrusting his men,
fled into Lancashire, and lurking for a time with Sir
i So Polydore Vergil. According to the journal of a herald who ac-
companied the progress (printed in Leland's Collectanea, vol. iv., from
Cott. MSS. Jul. B. xii.), which is hetter authority, news reached the king
at Pontefract that Lord Lovel had passed him on the road, and was pre-
paring to surprise him at York.
2 i. e. than that the rebels might easily be resisted. " Magis autem soli-
citum eum habuit copiarum delectus quibus resisteret rebellibus quam ijysorum
rebellium debellatio."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 69
Thomas Broughton, after sailed over into Flanders to
the Lady Margaret. And his men, forsaken of their
captain, did presently submit themselves to the Duke.
The JStafFords likewise, and their forces, hearing what
had happened to the Lord Lovell (in whose success
their chief trust was), despaired and dispersed ; the
two brothers taking sanctuary at Colnham, a village
near Abingdon ; which place, upon view of their privi-
lege in the King's bench, being judged no sufficient
sanctuary for traitors, Humphrey was executed at Ty-
burn ; and Thomas, as being led by his elder brother,
was pardoned. So this rebellion proved but a blast,
and the King having by this journey purged a little
the dregs and leaven of the northern people, that were
before in no good affection towards him, returned to
London.
In September following, the Queen was delivered of
her first son, whom the King (in honour of the British
race, of which himself was) named Arthur, according
to the name of that ancient worthy King of the Brit-
ons ; in whose acts there is truth enough to make him
famous, besides that which is fabulous.1 The child
was strong and able, though he was born in the eighth
month, which the physicians do prejudge.2
There followed this year, being the second of the
King's reign, a strange accident of state,3 whereof the
relations which we have are so naked, as they leave it
scarce credible ; not for the nature of it, (for it hath
1 In cujus rebus gestis asserendis satis invenitur in historia vera et monu-
mentis antiquis, quod ilium, demptis fabulis, magna gloria regno sse testetur.
2 De quo medici et astrologi male ominantur.
3 Mirum quoddam /acinus et audacia plenum, quodque stalum regis et regni
vehemenler perturbavit.
70 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
fallen out oft,) but for the manner and circumstance
of it, especially in the beginnings. Therefore we shall
make our judgment upon the things themselves, as
they give light one to another, and (as we can) dig
truth out of the mine. The King was green in his
estate ; and contrary to his own opinion and desert
both, was not without much hatred throughout the
realm. The root of all was the discountenancing of
the house of York, which the general body of the
realm still affected. This did alienate the hearts of
the subjects from him daily more and more, especially
when they saw that after his marriage, and after a son
born, the King did nevertheless not so much as pro-
ceed to the coronation of the Queen,1 not vouchsafing
her the honour of a matrimonial crown ; for the coro-
nation of her was not till almost two years after, when
danger had taught him what to do. But much more,
when it was spread abroad (whether by error or the
cunning of malcontents) that the King had a purpose
to put to death Edward Plantagenet closely in the
Tower : whose case was so nearly paralleled with that
of Edward the Fourth's children, in respect of the
blood, like age, and the very place of the Tower, as it
did refresh and reflect upon the King a most odious
resemblance, as if he would be another King Richard.
And all this time it was still whispered eveiywhere,
that at least one of the children of Edward the Fourth
was living. Which bruit was cunningly fomented by
such as desired innovation. Neither was the King's
nature and customs greatly fit to disperse these mists ;
but contrariwise he had a fashion rather to create
1 Nihihminus coronationem regince sum (quae conjunctim cum coronatione
propria ab omnibus primo erat spectata) adhuc distulisse.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 71
doubts than assurance. Thus was fuel prepared for
the spark: the spark, that afterwards kindled such a
fire and combustion, was at the first contemptible.
There was a subtile priest called Richard Simon,
that lived in Oxford, and had to his pupil a baker's
son x named Lambert Simnell, of the age of some fif-
teen years ; a comely youth, and well favoured, not
without some extraordinary dignity and grace of as-
pect. It came into this priest's fancy (hearing what
men talked, and in hope to raise himself to some great
bishoprick) to cause this lad to counterfeit and per-
sonate the second son of Edward the Fourth, supposed
to be murdered ; and afterward (for he changed his
intention in the manage) the Lord Edward Planta-
genet, then prisoner in the Tower ; and accordingly
to frame him and instruct him in the part he was to
play. This is that which (as was touched before)
seemeth scarcely credible ; not that a false person
should be assumed to gain a kingdom, for it hath
been seen in ancient and late times ; nor that it should
come into the mind of such an abject fellow to enter-
prise so great a matter ; for high conceits do sometimes
come streaming into the imaginations of base persons ;
especially when they are drunk with news and talk of
the people. But here is that which hath no appear-
ance ; 2 that this priest, being utterly unacquainted
1 Speed, on the authority it seems of Bernard Andre, says son of a
baker or shoemaker. Archbishop Sancroft, on the authority of the
priest's declaration before the convocation of clergy, Feb. 17, 1486 {Reg.
Morton, f. 34.), says that he was the son of an organ-maker in Oxford, and
that the priest's name was William Simonds. See note on this passage in
Blackbourne's ed. of Bacon's works, vol. iii. p. 407., said to be from San-
croft's MS. In the act of attainder of the Earl of Lincoln (Rolls of Pari.
vol. vi. p. 397.) he is styled "one Lambert Symnell, a child of x yere of
age, sonne to Thomas Symnell, late of Oxford, joynoiire."
- Quod minime videtur probaMle.
72 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
with the true person according to whose pattern he
should shape his counterfeit, should think it possible
for him to instruct his player, either in gesture and
fashions, or in recounting past matters of his life and
education, or in fit answers to questions, or the like,
any ways to come near the resemblance of him whom
he was to represent. For this lad was not to person-
ate one that had been long before taken out of his
cradle, or conveyed away in his infancy, known to
few ; but a youth that till the age almost of ten years
had been brought up in a court where infinite eyes
had been upon him. For King Edward, touched with
remorse of his brother the Duke of Clarence's death,
would not indeed restore his son (of whom we speak)
to be Duke of Clarence, but yet created him Earl of
Warwick, reviving his honour on the mother's side,
and used him honourably during his time, though
Richard the Third afterwards confined him. So that
it cannot be, but that some great person, that knew
particularly and familiarly Edward Plantagenet, had a
hand in the business, from whom the priest might take
his aim. That which is most probable, out of the pre-
cedent and subsequent acts, is, that it was the Queen
Dowager from whom this action had the principal
source and motion. For certain it is, she was a busy
negotiating woman, and in her with drawing-chamber
had the fortunate conspiracy for the King against King
Richard the Third been hatched ; which the King
knew, and remembered perhaps but too well ; and was
at this time extremely discontent with the King, think-
ing her daughter (as the King handled the matter) not
advanced but depressed : and none could hold the book
so well to prompt and instruct this stage-play, as she
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 73
could. Nevertheless it was not her meaning, nor no
more was it the meaning of any of the better and sager
sort that favoured this enterprise and knew the secret,
tha|L this disguised idol should possess the crown ; but
at his peril to make way to the overthrow of the King ;
and that done, they had their several hopes and ways.
That which doth chiefly fortify this conjecture is, that
as soon as the matter brake forth in any strength, it
was one of the King's first acts to cloister the Queen
Dowager in the nunnery of Bermondsey, and to take
away all her lands and estate ; x and this by a close
counsel, without any legal proceeding, upon far-fetched
1 This is distinctly stated by Polydore Vergil, Hall, and Speed. Dr.
Lingard disputes the fact, referring to the collection of unpublished Acts
by Ryraer; Hen. VII. Nos. 29, 39. Her dower (he says), of which she had
been deprived by Richard III., had not been restored by Henry's parlia-
ment: instead of it the king granted her a compensation. Which is true.
From the calendar of the Patent Rolls now deposited in the Rolls Chapel,
it appears (p. 160.) that on the 4th of March 1485-6 various lordships and
manors were granted to her for life in part recornpence of her dowry, and
that on the following day other lordships and manors, of which the enu-
meration occupies forty-six lines, together with certain " yearly pay-
ments," amounting altogether to 655/. 7s. Q$d., were in like manner
granted to her for life in recornpence of the residue of her dowry.
Dr. Lingard does not indeed allege any grounds for thinking that this
compensation was not now withdrawn; which would justify Polydore's
statement in substance. But he does allege good reasons for thinking that
Polydore's account of the severity exercised towards the Queen Dowager
for the rest of her days is exaggerated; the principal evidence to the con-
trary being the project of a marriage between her and James III. of Scot-
land, which was certainly entertained in the following year. See Rymer,
xii. 329. It is also certain that on the 19th of February 1490, an annuity
of 400Z. was granted to her (Cal. Pat. Rolls, 5 Hen. VII. p. 38.). But this
may have been in consideration of the withdrawal of the former grant, —
if it was withdrawn.
Bacon does not seem to have had any original information on this mat-
ter. He merely repeats the original story as he found it; and we can only
infer from his adoption of it that he had seen no reason for doubting its
accuracy. It is certainly not true that the Queen Dowager was entirely
secluded from court for the remainder of her life; for she was with her
74 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
pretences, — that she had delivered her two daughters
out of sanctuary to King Richard, contrary to promise.
Which proceeding being even at that time taxed for
rigorous and undue, both in matter and manner, makes
it very probable there was some greater matter against
her, which the King upon reason of policy and to
avoid envy would not publish. It is likewise no small
argument that there was some secret in it and some
suppressing of examinations, for that the priest Simon
himself after he was taken was never brought to ex-
ecution ; no not so much as to public trial (as many
clergymen were upon less treasons) ; but was only
shut up close in a dungeon. Add to this that after
the Earl of Lincoln (a principal person of the house
of York) was slain in Stoke-field, the King opened
himself to some of his counsel, that he was sorry for
the Earl's death, because by him (he said) he might
have known the bottom of his danger.
But to return to the narration itself : Simon did first
instruct his scholar for the part of Richard Duke of
York, second son to King Edward- the Fourth ; and
this was at such time as it was voiced that the King
purposed to put to death Edward Plantagenet prisoner
in the Tower, whereat there was great murmur. But
hearing soon after a general bruit that Plantagenet had
escaped out of the Tower,1 and thereby finding him
daughter in November 1489 (Lei. iv. p. 249). It probably is true that she
was not much at court, but lived in retirement; for which there may have
been many reasons. She was growing old; the King's mother was gener-
ally with the Queen ; and it often happens that the mother and the mother-
in-law can live more comfortably at a little distance from each other. The
King may have been obliged to choose which of the two he would have in
his house, — his own mother or his wife's.
1 Polydore says, in carcere interiisse. In this Bacon seems to have
followed Hall, who says the rumour was that he had broken out of prison.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 75
so much beloved amongst the people, and such rejoic-
ing at his escape, the cunning priest changed his copy,
and chose now Plantagenet to be the subject his pupil
shpuld personate, because he was more in the present
speech and votes of the people ; and it pieced better,
and followed more close and handsomely upon the
bruit of Plantagenet's escape. But yet doubting that
there would be too near looking and too much perspec-
tive into his disguise,1 if he should shew it here in
England ; he thought good (after the manner of scenes
in stage-plays and masks) to shew it afar off; and
therefore sailed with his scholar into Ireland, where
the affection to the house of York was most in height.
The King had been a little improvident in the matters
of Ireland, and had not removed officers and counsel-
lors, and put in their places, or at least intermingled,
persons of whom he stood assured ; as he should have
done, since he knew the strong bent of that country
towards the house of York, and that it was a ticklish
and unsettled state, more easy to receive distempers
and mutations than England was. But trusting to the
reputation of his victories and successes in England,
he thought he should have time enough to extend his
cares afterwards to that second kingdom.
Wherefore through this neglect, upon the coming of
Simon with his pretended Plantagenet into Ireland, all
things were prepared for revolt and sedition, almost as
if they had been set and plotted beforehand. Simon's
first address was to the Lord Thomas Fitz-Gerard,
Earl of Kildare and Deputy of Ireland ; before whose
eyes he did cast such a mist (by his own insinuation,
1 Minus sibi tutum futurum, et hominum curiositati et itiquisitioni magis
obnoxium.
76 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
and by the carriage of his youth, that expressed a
natural princely behaviour) as, joined perhaps with
some inward vapours of ambition and affection in the
Earl's own mind, left him fully possessed that it was
the true Plantagenet. The Earl presently communi-
cated the matter with some of the nobles and others
there, at the first secretly. But finding them of like
affection to himself, he suffered it of purpose to vent
and pass abroad ; because they thought it not safe to
resolve, till they had a taste of the people's inclination.
But if the great ones were in forwardness, the people
were in fury, entertaining this airy body or phantasm
with incredible affection ; partly out of their great
devotion to the house of York, partly out of a proud
humour in the nation to give a King to the realm of
England. Neither did the party in this heat of affec-
tion much trouble themselves with the attainder of
George Duke of Clarence ; having newly learned by
the King's example that attainders do not interrupt the
conveying of title to the crown. And as for the
daughters of King Edward the Fourth, they thought
King Richard had said enough for them ; 1 and took
them to be but as of the King's party, because they
were in his power and at his disposing. So that with
marvellous consent and applause, this counterfeit Plan-
tagenet was brought with great solemnity to the castle
of Dublin, and there saluted, served, and honoured as
King ; the boy becoming it well, and doing nothing
that did bewray the baseness of his condition. And
within a few days after he was proclaimed King in
1 i. e. the example of Richard had shown that their claim was no insu-
perable impediment. The Latin is fuller —facile innitebantur repulsce
quam a Rege Eichardo hcereditate regni summotce, tulissent.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 77
Dublin, by the name of King Edward the Sixth ;
there being not a sword drawn in King Henry his
quarrel.
The King was much moved with this unexpected
accident, when it came to his ears, both because it
struck upon that string which ever he most feared,1
as also because it was stirred in such a place, where he
could not with safety transfer his own person to sup-
press it. For partly through natural valour and partly
through an universal suspicion (not knowing whom to
trust) he was ever ready to wait upon all his achieve-
ments in person. The King therefore first called his
counsel together at the Charter-house at Shine ; 2
which counsel was held with great secrecy, but the
open decrees thereof, which presently came abroad,
were three.
The first was, that the Queen Dowager, for that
she, contrary to her pact and agreement with those
that had concluded with her concerning the marriage
of her daughter Elizabeth with King Henry, had
nevertheless delivered her daughters out of sanctuary
into King Richard's hands, should be cloistered in the
nunnery of Bermondsey,3 and forfeit all her lands and
goods.
1 i. e. the revival of the York title. Tituli scilicet Eboracensis families
resuscitationem.
2 This was soon after Candlemas, 1486-7. See the Herald's narrative,
Cott. MSS., Jul. B. xii. fo. 23.; or Leland, IV. p. 208.
3 This fact is stated by Speed, on the authority probably of Hall; who
says that she " lived ever after in the Abbey of Bermondsey at South-
wark, a wretched and miserable life, where not long after she deceased."
The statement as to her residing there for the rest of her life is confirmed
by the fact that her will, which is dated 10th April, 1492, was witnessed
by the Abbot of Bermondsey; and it seems that she had a right, under
the will of the founder, to accommodation in the state apartments there.
If there be any ground for supposing that Henry compelled her to reside
78 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
The next was, that Edward Plantagenet, then close
prisoner in the Tower, should be, in the most public
and notorious manner that could be devised, shewed
unto the people : in part to discharge the King of the
envy of that opinion and bruit, how he had been put
to death privily in the Tower ; but chiefly to make
the people see the levity and imposture of the proceed-
ings of Ireland, and that their Plantagenet was indeed
but a puppet or a counterfeit.
The third was, that there should be again pro-
claimed a general pardon to all that would reveal their
offences * and submit themselves by a day ; and that
this pardon should be conceived in so ample and lib-
eral a manner, as no high-treason (no not against
the King's own person) should be excepted. Which
though it might seem strange, yet was it not so to a
wise King, that knew his greatest dangers were not
from the least treasons, but from the greatest. These
resolutions of the King and his counsel were immedi-
ately put in execution. And first, the Queen Dow-
ager was put into the monastery of Bermondsey, and
all her estate seized into the King's hands : whereat
there was much wondering ; that a weak woman, for
the yielding to the menaces and promises of a tyrant,
after such a distance of time (wherein the King
had shown no displeasure nor alteration), but much
more after so happy a marriage between the King and
her daughter, blessed with issue male, should upon a
there against her will, it may be imputed perhaps to his natural aversion
to see a good thing thrown away. Her pension may possibly have been
given upon condition that she should not pay for lodgings when she might
have them for nothing. See note p. 73.
1 This condition is not mentioned by the earlier historians. Polydore
says, Qui in officio deinceps permanserint.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 79
sudden mutability or disclosure of the King's mind be
so severely handled.
This lady was amongst the examples of great vari-
ety of fortune. She had first, from a distressed suitor
ancT desolate widow, been taken to the marriage bed of
a bachelor-King, the goodliest personage of his time ;
and even in his reign she had endured a strange
eclipse, by the King's flight and temporary depriving
from the crown. She was also very happy in that she
had by him fair issue, and continued his nuptial love
(helping herself by some obsequious bearing and dis-
sembling of his pleasures) to the very end. She was
much affectionate to her own kindred, even unto fac-
tion ; which did stir great envy in the lords of the
King's side, who counted her blood a disparagement
to be mingled with the King's. With which lords of
the King's blood joined also the King's favourite the
Lord Hastings ; who, notwithstanding the King's great
affection to him, was thought at times, through her
malice and spleen, not to be out of danger of falling.
After her husband's death she was matter of tragedy,
having lived to see her brother beheaded, and her two
sons deposed from the crown, bastarded in their blood,
and cruelly murdered. All this while nevertheless she
enjoyed her liberty, state, and fortunes.1 But after-
1 This can hardly be correct. For her marriage having been declared by-
act of Parliament invalid and her children illegitimate, her inheritance
(unless expressly reserved to her by the act, which seems unlikely) must
have been taken away. It is true however that on the 1st of March,
1483-4, about eight months after Richard's accession, he bound himself to
befriend and provide for her daughters as his kinswomen, and to allow her
700 marks (466J. 13s. 4d.) a year for life, if they would come out of sanc-
tuary. On the accession of Henry she was restored to her rank and
style, and the act by which her marriage had been declared illegitimate
was reversed without being read, " that the matter might be and remain
80 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
wards again, upon the rise of the wheel, when she had
a King to her son-in-law, and was made grandmother
to a grandchild of the best sex, yet was she (upon
dark and unknown reasons, and no less strange pre-
tences,) precipitated and banished the world into a
nunnery ; where it was almost thought dangerous to
visit her or see her ; and where not long after she
ended her life ; x but was by the King's commandment
buried with the King her husband at Windsor. She
was foundress of Queen's College in Cambridge. For
this act the King sustained great obloquy, which nev-
ertheless (besides the reason of state) was somewhat
sweetened to him by a great confiscation.
About this time also, Edward Plantagenet was upon
a Sunday brought throughout all the principal streets
of London, to be seen of the people. And having
passed the view of the streets, was conducted to Paul's
Church in2 solemn procession, where great store of
people were assembled. And it was provided also in
good fashion, that divers of the nobility and others of
quality (especially of those that the King most sus-
pected, and knew the person of Plantagenet best) had
communication with the young gentleman by the way,3
and entertained him with speech and discourse, which
in perpetual oblivion for the falseness and shamefulness of it." The orig-
inal was removed from the Rolls and burned, and all copies destroyed.
And as the proceeding did not, it seems, involve the restitution of her
forfeited lands, Henry, on the 4th and 5th of March, 1485-6, granted her
the compensation mentioned in note 1. p. 73.
1 In 1492.
2 Here we recover the MS.
8 This is Polydore's statement. It seems however that besides being
thus publicly exhibited, he was kept for some time in the beginning of
February, 1486-7, about the court at Sheen. The Herald (Cott. Jul. xii.
p. 23.) says that Lord Lincoln "daily spake with him at Sheen, afore his
departing."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 81
did in effect mar the pageant in Ireland with the sub-
jects here ; at least with so many as out of error, and
not out of malice, might be misled. Nevertheless in
Ireland (where it was too late to go back) it wrought
little or no effect. But contrariwise they turned the
imposture upon the King ; and gave out that the King,
to defeat the true inheritor, and to mock the world and
blind the eyes of simple men, had tricked up a boy in
the likeness of Edward Plantagenet, and shewed him
to the people ; not sparing to profane the ceremony of
a procession, the more to countenance the fable.
The general pardon likewise near the same time
came forth ; and the King therewithal omitted no dili-
gence in giving straight order for the keeping of the
ports ; that fugitives, malcontents, or suspected persons
might not pass over into Ireland and Flanders.
Meanwhile the rebels in Ireland had sent privy mes-
sengers both into England and into Flanders, who in
both places had wrought effects of no small importance.
For in England they won to their party John Earl of
Lincoln, son of John De la Pole Duke of Suffolk, and
of Elizabeth King Edward the Fourth's eldest sister.
This Earl was a man of great wit and courage, and had
his thoughts highly raised by hopes and expectations
for a time. For Richard the Third had a resolution,
out of his hatred to both his brethren, King Edward
and the Duke of Clarence, and their lines, (having
had his hand in both their bloods), to disable their
issues upon false and incompetent pretexts, the one of
attainder, the other of illegitimation ; and to design
this gentleman (in case himself should die without
children) for inheritor of the crown. Neither was this
unknown to the King (who had secretly an eye upon
82 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
him) : but the King having tasted of the envy of the
people for his imprisonment of Edward Plantagenet,
was doubtful to heap up any more distastes of that
kind by the imprisonment of De la Pole also ; the
rather thinking it policy to conserve him as a corrival
unto the other. The Earl of Lincoln was induce* 1 to
participate with the action of Ireland, not lightly upon
the strength of the proceedings there, which was l>ut
a bubble ; but upon letters from the Lady Margaret
of Burgundy, in whose succours and declaration for the
enterprise there seemed to be a more solid foundation,
both for reputation and forces. Neither did the Earl
refrain the business for that he knew the pretended
Plantagenet to be but an idol. But contrariwise he
was more glad it should be the false Plantagenet than
the true ; because the false being sure to fall away of
himself, and the true to be made sure of by the King,
it might open and pave a fair and prepared way to his
own title. With this resolution he sailed secretly into
Flanders,1 where was a little before arrived the Lord
Lovell, leaving a correspondence here in England with
Sir Thomas Broughton,2 a man of great power and
dependencies in Lancashire. For before this time/3
when the pretended Plantagenet was first received in
i This must have been a little after Candlemas. "And after Oandell-
masse the King at Shene had a great counsell of his lords both spuelx
and templx . . . and at that counseill was the Erie of Lincoln, which incon-
tinently after the said counseil departed the lande and went into Maun-
ders," &c. (Cott. MSS., ubi supra.)
2 Qui consiliorum suorum veluti procurator em in Anglia rdiqueral Thomam
B. (fc.
3 The translation adds — (ut supra diximus), referring to the messengers
mentioned at the beginning of the paragraph. In the MS. the words " («|
we said before) " inserted after " Lady Margaret," have a line drawn
through them.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 83
Ireland, secret messengers had been also sent to the
Lady Margaret, advertising her what had passed in
Ireland, imploring succours in an enterprise (as they
saidy so pious and just, and that God had so miracu-
lously prospered in the beginning thereof; and making
offer that all things should be guided by her will and
direction, as the sovereign patroness and protectress
of the enterprise. Margaret was second sister to King
Edward the Fourth, and had been second wife to
Charles surnamed the Hardy, Duke of Burgundy.
By whom having no children of her own, she did
with singular care and tenderness intend the education
of Philip and Margaret, grandchildren to her former
husband ; * which won her great love and authority
among the Dutch. This Princess (having the spirit
of a man and malice of a woman) abounding in treas-
ure by the greatness of her dower and her provident
government, and being childless and without any
nearer care, made it her design and enterprise to see
the Majesty Royal of England once again replaced in
her house ; and had set up King Henry as a mark at
whose overthrow all her actions should aim and shoot ;
insomuch as all the counsels of his succeeding troubles
came chiefly out of that quiver. And she bare such
a mortal hatred to the house of Lancaster and person-
ally to the King, as she was no ways mollified by the
conjunction of the houses in her niece's marriage ; but
rather hated her niece, as the means of the King's
ascent to the crown and assurance therein. Where-
1 An incorrect expression; which is retained in the translation. He
meant to say grandchildren to her husband by his former wife. They were
the children of Maria, Charles's only child by his first marriage. See
Polydore Vergil, p. 724.
84 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
fore with great violence of affection she embraced this
overture. And upon counsel taken with the Earl of
Lincoln and the Lord Lovell, and some other of the
party, it was resolved with all speed, the two lords
assisted with a regiment of two thousand Almains,
being choice and veteran bands, under the command
of Martin Swart (a valiant and experimented captain)
should pass over into Ireland to the new King ; hop-
ing that when the action should have the face of a
received and settled regality (with such a second per-
son as the Earl of Lincoln, and the conjunction and
reputation of foreign succours), the fame of it would
embolden and prepare all the party of the confederates
and malcontents within the realm of England to give
them assistance when they should come over there.
And for the person of the counterfeit, it was agreed
that if all things succeeded well he should be put
down, and the true Plantagenet received ; wherein
nevertheless the Earl of Lincoln had his particular
hopes. After they were come into Ireland,1 (and that
the party took courage by seeing themselves together
in a body,) they grew very confident of success ; con-
ceiving and discoursing amongst themselves, that they
went in upon far better cards2 to overthrow King
Henry, than King Henry had to overthrow King
Richard : and that if there were not a sword drawn
against them in Ireland, it was a sign the swords in
England would be soon sheathed or beaten down.
And first, for a bravery upon this accession of power,
i In the beginning of Lent, according to the Herald (Cott. MSS. ubi
sup.) which would be in the beginning of March. Ash Wednesday fell
that year on the 28th of February.
2 Copiis multo majoribus insti~uctos.
HISTOEY OF KING HENKY VII. 85
they crowned their new King in the cathedral church
of Dublin, who formerly had been but proclaimed
only ; and then sat in counsel what should further be
doner At which counsel though it were propounded
by some that it were the best way to establish them-
selves first in Ireland, and to make that the seat of the
war, and to draw King Henry thither in person, by
whose absence they thought there would be great alter-
ations and commotions in England ; yet because the
kingdom there was poor, and they should not be able
to keep their army together, nor pay their German
soldiers ; and for that also the sway of the Irishmen
and generally of the men of war, which (as in such
cases of popular tumults is usual) did in effect govern
their leaders, was eager and in affection to make their
fortunes upon England ; it was concluded with all pos-
sible speed to transport their forces into England.1
The King in the mean time, who at the first when he
heard what was done in Ireland, though it troubled
him, yet thought he should be well enough able to
scatter the Irish as a flight of birds, and rattle away
this swarm of bees with their King ; when he heard
afterwards that the Earl of Lincoln was embarked in
the action, and that the Lady Margaret was declared
for it, he apprehended the danger in a true degree as
it was ; and saw plainly that his kingdom must again
be put to the stake, and that he must fight for it. And
first he did conceive, before he understood of the Earl
of Lincoln's sailing into Ireland out of Flanders, that
1 On the 4th of March, 1486-7, a commission was issued to Thomas
Brandon to take command of " the armed force about to proceed to
sea against the king's enemies there cruising." Cal. Pat. Rolls. 2
Hen. VII.
86 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
he should be assailed both upon the east parts of the
kingdom of England by some impression from Flan-
ders,1 and upon the north-west out of Ireland : and
therefore having ordered musters to be made in both
parts, and having provisionally designed two generals,
Jasper Earl of Bedford, and John Earl of Oxford
(meaning himself also to go in person where the affairs
should most require it), and nevertheless not expecting
any actual invasion at that time (the winter being far
on2), he took his journey himself towards Suffolk and
Norfolk, for the confirming of those parts. And being
come to St. Edmond's-bury, he understood that Thomas
Marquis of Dorset (who had been one of the pledges
in France) was hasting towards him to purge himself
of some accusations which had been made against him.
But the King though he kept an ear for him, yet was
the time so doubtful, that he sent the Earl of Oxford
to meet him and forthwith to carry him to the Tower,
with a fair message nevertheless that he should bear
that disgrace with patience ; for that the King meant
not his hurt, but only to preserve him from doing hurt
either to the King's service or to himself ; and that the
King should always be able (when he had cleared him-
self) to make him reparation.
From St. Edmond's-bury he went to Norwich, where
he kept his Christmas.3 And from thence he went
1 Facta invasione a copiis e Flandria.
2 Bacon in all this narrative follows Polydore Vergil; who mistook the
time of the year; thinking that all this took place before Christmas. It
appears from the Herald's narrative (which may be considered a conclu-
sive authority on such a point) that the King began his journey towards
Suffolk in "the second week in Lent: " which was the second week in
March. (Cott. MS. ubi sup.)
8 So Polydore: a mistake. It was Easter, not Christmas, that he kept
at Norwich. (Cott. MSS. ubi sup.) Bacon seems to have felt the difficulty
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 87
(in a manner of pilgrimage) to Walsingham, where he
visited our Lady's church, famous for miracles, and
made his prayers and vows for his help and deliver-
ance. And from thence he returned by Cambridge to
London.1 Not long after, the rebels with their King
(under the leading of the Earl of Lincoln, the Earl of
Kildare, the Lord Lovell, and Colonel Swart) landed
at Fouldrey in Lancashire, whither there repaired to
them Sir Thomas Bronghton, with some small com-
pany of English. The King by that time (knowing
now the storm would not divide but fall in one place)
had levied forces in good number ; and in person (tak-
ing with him his two designed generals, the Duke of
Bedford and the Earl of Oxford) was come on his way
towards them as far as Coventry, whence he sent forth
a troop of light-horsemen for discovery, and to inter-
of this date, though he had no authority for correcting it: for in the Latin
translation the words are omitted. Easter day fell that year on the 15th
of April. The King had kept his Christmas at Greenwich.
1 So again Polydore: a mistake; induced probably by the previous one.
From Norwich Henry went by Cambridge, Huntingdon, and Northampton
to Coventry ; where he was on the 22nd of April; and where he remained
until he heard of the landing of the rebels in Lancashire.
Polydore's mistake of Christmas for Easter is unlucky. It spoils the
story of the King's movements. The truth, I suppose, is that at first he
thought the danger was most imminent from Flanders, and then he kept
near his east coast and went to Norwich ; but finding that it did not gather
on that side but drew towards Ireland, he proceeded straight towards the
west, and took up his position at Coventry, at an equal distance from
either coast: and there waited till he should hear at what point he was
to be attacked. It was not till the 5th of May that the principal party of
the rebels landed in Ireland. (See the King's letter to E. of Ormond,
13th May, Ellis, 1. i. 18.) Upon news of which (according to the Herald,
ubi sup. p. 24.) he licensed divers of his nobles to go to their countries and
prepare to return with forces upon a day assigned; and himself rode over
to Kenilworth, where the Queen and his mother were; and there he heard
of the landing of the rebels in Lancashire; which was (see Rot. Pari,
p. 397.) on the 4th of June.
88 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
cept some stragglers of the enemies, by whom he might
the better understand the particulars of their progress
and purposes ; which was accordingly done ; though
the King otherways was not without intelligence from
espials in the camp.
The rebels took their way towards York without
spoiling the country or any act of hostility, the better
to put themselves into favour of the people and to per-
sonate their King (who no doubt out of a princely
feeling was sparing and compassionate towards his sub-
jects). But their snow-ball did not gather as it went.
For the people came not in to them ; neither did any
rise or declare themselves in other parts of the king-
dom for them ; which was caused partly by the good
taste that the King had given his people of his govern-
ment, joined with the reputation of his felicity ; and
partly for that it was an odious thing to the people of
England to have a King brought in to them upon the
shoulders of Irish and Dutch, of which their army was
in substance compounded. Neither was it a thing done
with any great judgment on the party of the rebels,
for them to take their way towards York ; considering
that howsoever those parts had formerly been a nursery
of their friends, yet it was there where the Lord Lovell
had so lately disbanded ; and where the King's pres-
ence had a little before qualified discontents. The
Earl of Lincoln, deceived of his hopes of the coun-
try's1 concourse unto him (in which case he would
have temporised) and seeing the business past retreat,2
1 Populum enim ad se certatim confiuxurum sibi promiseral. The MS. and
Ed. 1622 also have " countries; " meaning I think " of the countrie," not
"of the countries."
2 " Retraict " in the MS. : sine receptu in the translation.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 89
resolved to make on where the King was, and to give
him battle ; and thereupon marched towards Newark,
thinking to have surprised the town. But the King
was^ somewhat before this time come to Nottingham,
where he called a counsel of war, at which was con-
sulted whether it were best to protract time or speedily
to set upon the rebels. In which counsel the King
himself (whose continual vigilance did suck in some-
times causeless suspicions which few else knew) in-
clined to the accelerating a battle.1 But this was
presently put out of doubt, by the great aids that came
in to him in the instant of this consultation, partly
upon missives and partly voluntaries, from many parts
of the kingdom.
The principal persons that came then to the King's
aid were the Earl of Shrewsbury and the Lord Strange,
of the nobility, and of knights and gentlemen to the
number of at least threescore and ten persons, with
their companies ; making in the whole at the least six
thousand fighting men, besides the forces that were
with the King before. Whereupon the King finding
his army so bravely reinforced, and a great alacrity in
all his men to fight, he 2 was confirmed in his former
1 This is not stated by Polydore ; and I do not know where it comes from.
But the Herald's narrative supplies an anecdote illustrative of Henry's
proneness to " suspicions which few else knew," which is worth inserting.
■ And on the morrow, which was Corpus Christi day, after the King had
heard the divine service in the parish church, and the trumpets had
blown to horse, the King, not letting his host to understand his intent, rode
backward to see and also welcome the Lord Strange, which brought with
him a great host, .... which unknown turning to the host caused many
folks for to marvel. Also the King's standard and much carriage followed
after the King, unto the time the King was advertised by Garter King of
Arms, whom the King commanded to turn them all again," &c. Cott.
MS. ubi sup. p. 26.
2 The edition of 1622 omits " he."
90 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
resolution, and marched speedily, so as he put himself
between the enemies' camp and Newark ; being loth
their army should get the commodity of that town.
The Earl, nothing dismayed, came forwards that day
unto a little village called Stoke, and there encamped
that night, upon the brow or hanging of a hill. The
King the next day1 presented him battle upon the
plain (the fields there being open and champion).
The Earl courageously came down and joined battle
with him. Concerning which battle the relations that
are left unto us are so naked and negligent (though it
be an action of so recent memory) as they rather de-
clare the success of the day than the manner of the
fight. They say that the King divided his army
into three battails, whereof the vant-guard only well
strengthened with wings came to fight : 2 that the fight
was fierce and obstinate, and lasted three hours before
the victory inclined either way ; save that judgment
might be made by that the King's vant-guard of itself
maintained fight against the whole power of the ene-
mies (the other two battails remaining out of action)
what the "success was like to be in the end : that Mar-
tin Swart with his Germans performed bravely, and so
did those few English that were on that side ; neither
did the Irish fail in courage or fierceness, but being al-
most naked men, only armed with darts and skeins,3
it was rather an execution than a fight upon them ;
insomuch as the furious slaughter of them was a great
discouragement and appalment to the rest : that there
died upon the place all the chieftains ; that is, the Earl
1 Saturday, June 16, 1487.
2 The translation adds totumque exercitus hostilis impetum sustinuei'ai.
8 Ensibus.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 91
of Lincoln, the Earl of Kildare, Francis Lord Lovell,
Martin Swart, and Sir Thomas Broughton, all making
good the fight without any ground given. Only of
the Lord Lovell there went a report, that he fled, and
swam over Trent on horseback, hut could not recover
the further side, by reason of the steepness of the bank,
and so was drowned in the river. But another report
leaves him not there, but that he lived long after in a
cave or vault.1 The number that was slain in the
field, was of the enemies' part four thousand at the
least, and of the King's part one half of his vant-
guard, besides many hurt, but none of name. There
were taken prisoners amongst others the counterfeit
Plantagenet, now Lambert Symnell again, and the
crafty priest his tutor. For Lambert, the King would
not take his life, both out of magnanimity (taking him
but as an image of wax that others had tempered and
moulded), and likewise out of wisdom ; thinking that
if he suffered death he would be forgotten too soon ;
but being kept alive he would be a continual spectacle,
and a kind of remedy against the like inchantments of
people in time to come. For which cause he was
taken into service in his court to a base office in his
kitchen ; so that (in a kind of mattarina 2 of human
fortune) he turned a broach that had worn a crown ;
whereas fortune commonly doth not bring in a comedy
1 " Towards the close of the 17th century (says Dr. Lingard) at his seat
at Minster Lovell in Oxfordshire, was accidentally discovered a chamber
under the ground, in which was the skeleton of a man seated in a chair
with his head reclined on a table."
2 Insigni humance fortunes ludibrio. Mattacini, according to Florio, was
" a kind of moresco or m attach ino dance." He does not give the word
mattacina. But I take it that mattacini were properly the dancers of this
dance, and that mattacina was a dance of mattacini, just as atielana was a
play of attelani.
92 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
or farce after a tragedy. And afterwards he was pre-
ferred to be one of the King's falconers. As to the
priest, he was committed close prisoner, and heard
of no more ; the King loving to seal up his own dan-
gers.
After the battle the King went to Lincoln, where
he caused supplications and thanksgivings to be made
for his deliverance and victory. And that his devo-
tions might go round in circle, he sent his banner to be
offered to our Lady of Walsingham, where before he
made his vows.
And thus delivered of this so strange an engine and
new invention of fortune,1 he returned to his former
confidence of mind, thinking now that all his misfor-
tunes had come at once. But it fell unto him2 accord-
ing to the speech of the common people in the begin-
ning of his reign, that said, It was a token he should
reign in labour, because his reign began with a sickness
of sweat. But howsoever the King thought himself
now in the haven,3 yet such was his wisdom, as his
confidence did seldom darken his foresight, especially
in things near-hand ; and therefore, awakened by so
fresh and unexpected dangers, he entered into due con-
sideration as well how to weed out the partakers of the
former rebellion, as to kill the seeds of the like in time
to come : and withal to take away all shelters and har-
bours for discontented persons, where they might hatch
and foster rebellions which afterwards might gather
strength and motion.
And first he did yet again make a progress from
1 Tarn insigni fortunes machina (quae in eum itdentatafuerat).
2 So the MS. The edition of 1622 has " fell out."
8 Ed. 1622 has " a haven."
HIST OK Y OF KING HENRY VII. 93
Lincoln to the northern parts, though it were (indeed)
rather an itinerary circuit of justice than a progress.
For all along as he went, with much severity and strict
inquisition, partly by martial law and partly by com-
mission,1 were punished the adherents and aiders of
the late rebels ; not all by death (for the field had
drawn much blood), but by fines and ransoms, which
spared life and raised treasure. Amongst other crimes
of this nature, there was a diligent inquiry made of
such as had raised and dispersed a bruit and rumour
(a little before the field fought) that the rebels had the
day, and that the King's army was overthrown, and
the King fled: whereby it was supposed that many
succours which otherwise would have come unto the
King were cunningly put off and kept back : which
charge and accusation, though it had some ground, yet
it was industriously embraced and put on by divers,
who (having been in themselves not the best affected
to the King's part, nor forward to come to his aid)
were glad to apprehend this colour to cover their neg-
lect and coldness under the pretence of such discour-
agements. Which cunning nevertheless the King
would not understand, though he lodged it and noted
it in some particulars, as his manner was.
But for the extirpating of the roots and causes of the
like commotions in time to come, the King began to
find where his shoe did wring him ; and that it was
his depressing of the house of York that did rankle
and fester the affections of his people. And therefore
being now too wise to disdain perils any longer,2 and
1 Partim via juslitice ordinaria.
2 Factus igitur jam cautior, neque pericula amplius contemnere, aui reme-
dia eorum dedignatione quadam rejicere volens.
94 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
willing to give some contentment in that kind (at least
in ceremony), lie resolved at last1 to proceed to the
coronation of his Queen. And therefore at his coming
to London, where he entered in state, and in a kind of
triumph, and celebrated his victory with two days of
devotion, (for the first day he repaired to Paul's, and
had the hymn of Te Deum sung, and the morrow after
he went in procession, and heard the sermon at the
Cross,) the Queen was with great solemnity crowned
at Westminster, the twenty-fifth of November,2 in the
third year of his reign, which was about two years
after the marriage (like an old christening that had
stayed long for godfathers) ; which strange and un-
usual distance of time made it subject to every man's
note that it was an act against his stomach, and put
upon him by necessity and reason of state. Soon after,
to shew that it was now fair weather again, and that
the imprisonment of Thomas Marquis Dorset an a^
rather upon suspicion of the time than of the man,
he the said Marquis was set at liberty, without ex-
amination or other circumstance.
At that time also the King sent an ambassador unto
Pope Innocent, signifying unto him this his marriage ;
and that now like another ^Eneas he had passed
i We learn from the Herald's narrative (Cott. MSS. Jul. xii. fo. 28.) that
the resolution was taken at Warwick in September. The King and Queen
left Warwick on Saturday, October 27, and entered London on the 3rd of
November.
2 There was a Parliament sitting at the time, which Bacon does not
seem to have known. We learn from the Herald (Cott. MSS., ubi sup. fo.
40. b.) that the coronation festivities were ended (27th November) sooner
than they would have been, by reason of "the great business of the Par-
liament." This was Henry's second Parliament. It met on the 9th of
the month, and voted (in consideration of the rebellion just suppressed,
I suppose, as well as of the Queen's coronation) two fifteenths and tenths.
Stowe knew nothing of this Parliament.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 95
through the floods of his former troubles and travails
and was arrived unto a safe haven ; and thanking his
Holiness that he had honoured the celebration of his
marriage with the presence of his ambassador ; and
offering both his person and the forces of his kingdom
upon all occasions to do him service.
The ambassador making his oration1 to the Pope
in the presence of the cardinals, did so magnify the
King and Queen, as was enough to glut the hearers.2
But then he did again so extol and deify the Pope, as
made all that he had said in praise of his master and
mistress seem temperate and passable. But he was
very honourably entertained and extremely much made
on by the Pope, who knowing himself to be lazy and
unprofitable to the Christian world, was wonderful3
glad to hear that there were such echoes of him sound-
ing in remote parts. He obtained also of the Pope a
very just and honourable Bull, qualifying the privi-
leges of sanctuary (wherewith the King had been
extremely galled) in three points.
The first, that if any sanctuary-man did by night
or otherwise get out of sanctuary privily and commit
mischief and trespass, and then come in again, he
should leese the benefit of sanctuary for ever after.
The second, that howsoever the person of the sanc-
tuary-man was protected from his creditors, yet his
goods out of sanctuary should not.
The third, that if any took sanctuary for case of
1 The heads of this oration may still be seen among the Cotton MSS. in
the British Museum (Cleop. E. iii. f. 123.) ; and read by any one who
thinks it worth while to decipher them.
2 Utfastidio eos qui aderant prope enecaret.
8 " Wonderfully." Ed. 1622.
9b HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
treason, the King might appoint him keepers to look
to him in sanctuary.1
The King also, for the better securing of his estate
against mutinous and malcontented subjects (whereof
he saw the realm was full) who might have their
refuge into Scotland (which was not under key as the
ports were), for that cause rather than for any doubt
of hostility from those parts, before his coming to Lon-
don, when he was at Newcastle, had sent a solemn
ambassage unto James the Third, King of Scotland,
to treat and conclude a peace with him. The ambas-
sadors were, Richard Foxe Bishop of Exeter, and Sir
Richard Edgcombe comptroller of the King's house,
who were honourably received and entertained there.
But the King of Scotland labouring of the same disease
that King Henry did (though more mortal as after-
wards appeared), that is, discontented subjects apt to
rise and raise tumult, although in his own affection he
did much desire to make a peace with the King, yet
finding his nobles averse and not daring to displease
them, concluded only a truce for seven years ; 2 giv-
1 1. e. keepers within the sanctuary. Custodes ei intra asylum apponere
qui ejus dicta et facta observarent.
2 This is Polydore Vergil's statement, who seems to have known nothing
of the real subject of this treaty. It appears from Rymer that a truce
between England and Scotland for three years, counting from the 3rd of
July, 1486, had been negotiated during the King's first progress into the
northern counties in the spring of that year, when he was engaged in sub-
duing Lord Lovel's rebellion; which truce was still in force. On the 7th
of November, 1487, which was a few days after the King's return to Lon-
don from his second progress into those counties, commissioners were ap-
pointed to treat of certain intermarriages between the tioo royal families ; it
being proposed that the Scotch King should marry Elizabeth, Edward the
Fourth's widow; and that the Duke of Rothsay should marry one of her
daughters, and the Marquis of Ormond another. By these commissioners
a treaty was shortly concluded, by which it was agreed in the first place
that the existing truce should be continued to the 1st of September, 1489;
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 97
ing nevertheless promise in private, that it should be
renewed from time to time during the two Kings'
lives.
Hitherto the King had been exercised in settling
his affairs at home. But about this time brake forth
an occasion that drew him to look abroad and to
hearken to foreign business. Charles the Eighth, the
French King, by the virtue and good fortune of his
two immediate predecessors, Charles the Seventh his
grandfather and Lewis the Eleventh his father, re-
ceived the kingdom of France in more flourishing and
spread estate 1 than it had been of many years before ;
being redintegrate in those principal members which
anciently had been portions of the crown of France,
and were after dissevered, so as they remained only in
homage and not in sovereignty, being governed by
absolute princes 2 of their own ; Anjou, Normandy,
Provence, and Burgundy. There remained only Brit-
taine 3 to be re-united, and so the monarchy of France
to be reduced to the ancient terms and bounds.
and in the next place, that, in order to settle the articles and conditions of
these marriages, commissioners on both sides should meet at Edinburgh
on the 24th of the following January, and another assembly be held on the
same subject in May. So much was concluded on the 28th of November,
1487. The negotiation was afterwards broken off (according to Tytler,
who quotes Rotul. Scot. vol. ii. p. 483.) upon the question of the surrender
of Berwick ; upon which James insisted, and to which Henry would not
consent. See Tytler' s Hist, of Scot. vol. iv. p. 305.
1 Opibus Jlorentius et ipso territorio amplius.
2 This is explained (or corrected) in the Latin translation to mean
princes governing in their own right: cum a principibus propriis jure tan-
quam regio administrarentur.
3 I have retained the spelling of the MS. In the edition of 1622 it is
spelt Britaine. In modern histories it is always spelt either Bretagne or
Brittany.
VOL. XI. 7
98 HISTORY OF KING HEXRY VII.
King Charles was not a little inflamed with an am-
bition to re-purchase and re-annex that duchy ; which
his ambition was a wise and well-weighed ambition ;
not like unto the ambitions of his succeeding enter-
prises of Italy.1 For at that time, being newly come
to the crown, he was somewhat guided by his father's
counsels ; (counsels not counsellors, for his father was
his own counsel, and had few able men about him ;)
and that King (he knew well) had ever distasted the
designs of Italy, and in particular had an eye upon
Brittaine. There were many circumstances that did
feed the ambition of Charles with pregnant and appar-
ent hopes of success. The Duke of Brittaine old, and
entered into a lethargy, and served with mercenary
counsellors, father of two only daughters, the one
sickly and not like to continue.- King Charles him-
self in the flower of his age,2 and the subjects of
France at that time3 well trained for war, both for
leaders and soldiers (men of service being not yet
worn out since the wars of Lewis against Burgundy).
He found himself also in peace with all his neighbour
princes. As for those that might oppose to his enter-
prise ; Maximilian King of Romans, his rival in the
same desires (as well for the duchy as the daughter),
feeble in means ; and King Henry of England as well
1 The difference is perhaps best explained by supposing that the latter
ambitions were his own, while these were his sister's, the princess Anne,
Duchess of Bourbon; under whose guardianship Charles, who was only
fourteen when he came to the throne in 1483, had been placed by his
father; and by whom modern historians suppose him to have been entirely
guided during all the early stages of this business.
2 Rather in the blossom than the flower. In the summer of 1487 he was
still only eighteen.
3 Pro ratione ejus lemporis in the translation: which would mean "for
that time."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 99
somewhat obnoxious x to him for his favours and ben-
efits, as busied in his particular troubles at home.
There was also a fair and specious occasion offered
him r-to hide his ambition and to justify his warring
upon Brittaine ; 2 for that the Duke had received and
succoured Lewis Duke of Orleans and others of the
French nobility, which had taken arms against their
King. Wherefore King Charles, being resolved upon
that war, knew well he could not receive any opposi-
tion so potent as if King Henry should either upon
policy of state in preventing the growing greatness of
France, or upon gratitude unto the Duke of Brittaine
for his former favours in the time of his distress,3
espouse that quarrel and declare himself in aid of the
Duke.4 Therefore he no sooner heard that King
Henry was settled by his victory, but forthwith he
sent ambassadors unto him to pray his assistance, or
at least that he would stand neutral. Which ambas-
sadors found the King at Leicester,5 and delivered
their ambassage to this effect : They first imparted
unto the King the success that their master had had a
little before against Maximilian in recovery of certain
1 Sibi non nihil devinctum. For this word " obnoxious," now no longer
used in this sense, though always so used by Bacon, it is not easy to find
an exact equivalent. It means rather more than " obliged," and not quite
so much as " dependent." When one man stands in such a relation to
another that he is not free to act as he otherwise would, Bacon would
have said that he is obnoxious to him.
2 Belli ansam adversus Britanniam porrigeret.
3 Quod ipse Duci etiam Britannia} non minus quam sibi ob ejus in rebtis
suis adversis merita obstrictus fuisset.
4 The last clause is omitted in the translation.
5 In the summer of 1487; probably in September; certainly not later,
for the King was at Warwick in September. See note 1, p. 94. The Latin
translation has Lancastriam, probably a mistake. Polydore Vergil, whose
narrative is followed by all the old historians, has ad Lecestriam.
100 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
towns from him ; * which was done in a kind of pri-
vacy and inwardness towards the King ; as if the
French King did not esteem him for an outward or
formal confederate, but as one that had part in his
affections and fortunes, and with whom he took pleas-
ure to communicate his business. After this compli-
ment and some gratulation for the King's victory, they
fell to their errand : declaring to the King, that their
master was enforced to enter into a just and necessary
war with the Duke of Brittaine, for that he had re-
ceived and succoured those that were traitors and
declared enemies unto his person and state : That they
were no mean distressed and calamitous persons that
fled to him for refuge, but of so great quality, as it
was apparent that they came not thither to protect
their own fortune, but to infest and invade his ; the
head of them being the Duke of Orleans, the first
Prince of the blood and the second person of France :
That therefore rightly to understand it, it was rather on
their master's part a defensive war than an offensive,
as that that could not be omitted or forborne if he ten-
dered the conservation of his own estate ; and that it
was not the first blow that made the war invasive (for
that no wise Prince would stay for), but the first prov-
ocation, or at least the first preparation ; nay that this
war was rather a suppression of rebels than a war
with a just enemy ; where the case is, that his subjects
traitors2 are received by the Duke of Brittaine his
1 In oppidis quibusdam quce invaserat Maximilianus recipiendis. He had
retaken St. Omers on the 27th of May, and Therouane on the 26th of July.
{Sism. xv. p. 99.)
2 In the edition of 1622 these words are printed thus : " his subjects,
traitors, are received," &c. In the MS. there is no comma before or after
traitors. And this I believe expresses the intended construction better.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 101
homager: That King Henry knew well what went
upon it in example, if neighbour Princes should pat-
ronise and comfort rebels against the law of nations
and of leagues : Nevertheless that their master was
not fgnorant that the King had been beholding to the
Duke of Brittaine in his adversity, as on the other
side they knew he would not forget also the readiness
of their King in aiding him when the Duke of Brit-
taine or his mercenary counsellors failed him, and
would have betrayed him ; and that there was a great
difference between the courtesies received from their
master and the Duke of Brittaine, for that the Duke's
might have ends of utility and bargain, whereas their
master's could not have proceeded but out of entire
affection ; for that if it had been measured by a politic
line, it had been better for his affairs that a tyrant
should have reigned in England, troubled and hated,
than such a Prince whose virtues could not fail to
make him great and potent, whensoever he was comen
to be master of his affairs : But howsoever it stood for
the point of obligation which the King might owe
to the Duke of Brittaine, yet their master was well
It is the same form which we have further on (pp. 134-145), merchants
strangers; for so it is written in the MS.; the double plural, without
any comma between. So it was usual in Bacon's time to say "letters
patents;" not "letters patent." In the edition of 1622 "merchants
strangers" is printed "merchant-strangers." According to which rule
"subjects traitors" would be corrected into "subject-traitors." But I
rather think that the true modern equivalents would be " stranger-mer-
chants," and " traitor-subjects."
The anomaly may have arisen either out of the practice (then usual) of
placing the adjective after its substantive, (when, in the case of words that
might be used either as adjectives or substantives, the plural without the
final s would sometimes sound odd); or simply from the preservation oc-
casionally of the French form of a phrase with which the ear had become
familiar in French.
102 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
assured it would not divert King Henry of England
from doing that that was just, nor ever embark him
in so ill-grounded a quarrel : Therefore since this
war which their master was now to make was but
to deliver himself from imminent dangers, their King
hoped the King would shew the like affection to the
conservation of their master's estate, as their master
had (when time was) shewed to the King's acquisition
of his kingdom : At the least that according to the
inclination which the King had ever professed of peace,
he would look on and stand neutral ; for that their
master could not with reason press him to undertake
part in the war, being so newly settled and recovered
from intestine seditions. But touching the mystery of
re-annexing of the duchy of Brittaine to the crown
of France, either by war or by marriage with the
daughter of Brittaine, the ambassadors bare aloof from
it as from a rock, knowing that it made most against
them ; and therefore by all means declined any men-
tion thereof, but contrariwise interlaced in their con-
ference with the King the assured purpose of their
master to match with the daughter of Maximilian ;
and entertained the King also with some wandering
discourses 1 of their King's purpose to recover by arms
1 This point is not mentioned by Polydore Vergil ; who seems to have
been the only authority with previous historians for all these transactions.
And hence it would appear that Bacon had some independent source of
information. The rest he might have inferred from Polydore's narrative :
but this (unless he had some other authority) he must have invented;
which he could have no object in doing. The thing is worth remarking;
because as Bacon undoubtedly composed the speeches in this history on
the Thucydidean principle, (uc uv kdonovv spot ekciotol nepl tuv ad tra-
povriov tu deovra fidTuar' einetv, exofievu otl eyyvrara rrjc t-vfnruarjc yvu-
y/nc tCv u1tj&C>c "kex&cvruv,) it might be suspected that he framed his
narrative upon the same principle; and if he had nothing besides Poly-
dore and the old chroniclers (who do little more than translate Polydorel
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 103
his right to the kingdom of Naples, by an expedition
in person ; all to remove the King from all jealousy
of any design in these hither parts upon Brittaine,
otherwise than for quenching of the fire which he
feared might be kindled in his own estate.
The King, after advice taken with his counsel, made
answer to the ambassadors. And first returned their
compliment, shewing he was right glad of the French
King's reception of those towns from Maximilian.
Then he familiarly related some particular passages
of his own adventures and victory passed. As to the
business of Brittaine, the King answered in few words ;
that the French King and the Duke of Brittaine were
the two persons to whom he was most obliged of all
men ; and that he should think himself very unhappy
if things should go so between them, as he should not
be able to acquit himself in gratitude towards them
both ; and that there was no means for him, as a
Christian King and a common friend to them, to
satisfy all obligations both to God and man, but to
offer himself for a mediator of an accord and peace be-
tween them ; by which course he doubted not but their
King's estate and honour both, would be preserved
with more safety and less envy than by a war ; and
that he would spare no cost or pains, no if it were
to go upon, it would appear that a good deal of it was mere invention.
We know however that in other parts of the history Bacon had indepen-
dent evidence, which is still extant and accessible; and there is no reason
to conclude that what is extant was all he had. The fire in the Cottonian
Library in 1731 may easily have destroyed the evidence of those parts of
the narrative which are not accounted for, as another such fire would in
all probability destroy the evidence of many which are. It is a fact that
the volumes relating to the times of Henry VII. have suffered much.
These remarks apply also to the passage about " envy," a little further on,
which is not to be found in Polydore.
104 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
to go on pilgrimage, for so good an effect ; and con-
cluded that in this great affair, which he took so much
to heart, he would express himself more fully 1 by an
ambassage, which he would speedily dispatch unto the
French King for that purpose. And in this sort the
French ambassadors were dismissed : the King avoid-
ing to understand any thing touching the re-annexing
of Brittaine, as the ambassadors had avoided to men-
tion it ; save that he gave a little touch of it in the
word envy. And so it was, that the King was neither
so shallow nor so ill advertised as not to perceive the
intention of the French for the investing himself of
Brittaine. But first, he was utterly unwilling (how-
soever he gave out) to enter into a war with France.
A fame of a war he liked well, but not an achievement ;
for the one he thought would make him richer, and the
other poorer ; and he was possessed with many secret
fears 2 touching his own people ; which he was therefore
1 So ed. 1622. The MS. omits " fully."
2 He had also a special reason for delaying a war with France at this
time, which is not mentioned in the histories, but may be gathered from
the Calendar of Patent Rolls, 3 Hen. VII. During the spring of 1488 some
danger was hanging over his own coasts, probably from Ireland. From
entries in the Calendar dated the 19th and 20th of February (1487-8) we
find that forces were then " about to proceed to sea in three Spanish ships
in resistance of the King's enemies," under command of Sir Charles Som-
erset. And again on the 4th of May following we find writs for the im-
pressment of soldiers, &c, — " an armed force being about to be sent
against the King's enemies congregating on the sea," — also under com-
mand of Sir Charles Somerset. (See vol. ii. p. 130.)
Who these enemies were, the Calendar does not state; but a previous
entry in the same volume (p. 105), though of later date, indicates the
quarter from which danger was to be feared. On the 25th of May a writ
was issued to Richard Eggecombe, Knt. the King's counsellor and comp-
troller of his household, empowering him u to assure to such as come from
Ireland to treat on matters concerning the sound rule of peace in that land, a
safe advent, stay, and return; " and further " to admit to the King's grace
all subjects of the said land that may submit themselves," &c. And at
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 105
loth to arm, and put weapons into their hands. Yet
notwithstanding, as a prudent and courageous Prince,
he was not so averse from a war, but that he was
resolved to choose it rather than to have Brittaine car-
ried by France ; being so great and opulent a duchy,
pp. 108, 9, we find a number of general pardons for Irishmen, bearing the
same date. These proceedings indicate probably the suppression of the
danger for the time. For during the rest of the summer we learn (Leland,
iv. p. 243.) that the King was engaged in hunting and sporting, and in the
autumn, he was free, as I shall show a little further on, to take more
active measures for the succour of Brittany.
On the 1st of October following, the King's uncle, the Duke of Bedford,
was made Lieutenant of Ireland for a year. ( Cal. Pat. Rolh, vol. iii.
p. 14.)
I am the rather disposed to think that defence against Ireland and not
succour to Brittany was the object of this voyage, because it seems to
have been at this time that Lord Woodville's project of raising volunteers
in aid of the Duke of Brittany (see p. 110) was countermanded. " My lord
hath been with the King in Windsor," (says William Paston, writing from
Hedingham, the Earl of Oxford's castle, to his brother, on the 13th of May
[1488],) " at St. George's feast; and there at the same feast were both the
ambassadors of Bretaigne and of Flanders, as well from the King of the Ro-
mans as from the young Duke; but I cannot shew you the certain whether
we shall have with them war or peace; but I understand for certain that
all such captains as went to the sea in Lent, that is to say Sir Charles
Somerset, Sir Richard Hawte, and Sir William Vampage, maketh them
ready to go to the sea again as shortly as they can; to what intent I cannot
say. Also whereas it was said that my Lord Wodevyle and other should
have gone over into Bretaigne to have aided the Duke of Bretaigne, I can-
not tell of none such aid ; but upon that saying there came many men to
Southampton, where it was said that he should have taken shipping, to
have waited upon him over; and so when he was countermanded, those that
resorted thither to have gone over with him tarried there still, in hope that
they should have been licensed to have gone over; and when they saw no
likelihood that they should have license, there was 200 of them that got
them into a Bretaigne ship," &c. &c. He goes on to say how these 200
arrived in Brittany, where they then were. — See Paston Letters, vol. v.
p. 367.
D'Argentre' (xiii. 41.) mentions an embassy sent by the Duke of Brit-
tany to England in September, 1487, and adds that Henry who was then
very busy (avoit lors bien des affaires) some time after sent some troops
to aid hiin, who were at the battle of St. Aubin, — but not above 500 men;
alluding no doubt to Lord Woodville's company.
106 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
and situate so opportunely to annoy England either
for coast or trade.1 But the King's hopes were, that
partly by negligence, commonly imputed to the French,
(especially in the court of a young King2) ; and partly
by the native power of Brittaine itself, which was not
small ; but chiefly in respect of the great party that the
Duke of Orleans had in the kingdom of France, and
thereby means to stir up civil troubles to divert the
French King from the enterprise of Brittaine ; 3 and
lastly in regard of the power of Maximilian, who was
corrival to the French King in that pursuit ; the enter-
prise would either bow to a peace or break in itself.
In all which the King measured and valued things
amiss, as afterwards appeared. He sent therefore forth-
with to the French King, Christopher Urswick his
chaplain, a person by him much trusted and employed ;
choosing him the rather because he was a church-
man, as best sorting with an embassy of pacification ;
and giving him also a commission, that if the French
King consented to treat, he should thence repair to the
Duke of Brittaine and ripen the treaty on both parts.
Urswick made declaration to the French King much to
the purpose of the King's answer to the French am-
bassadors here, instilling also tenderly some overture
of receiving to grace the Duke of Orleans, and some
taste of conditions of accord. But the French King on
the other side proceeded not sincerely, but with a great
deal of art and dissimulation in this treaty, having for his
end to gain time, and so put off the English succours,
1 Sive belh, sive impediendo commercium.
2 This parenthesis is omitted in the translation.
8 The edition of 1622 has a full stop after Brittaine: ohviously a mis-
print. I have followed the punctuation of the MS. ; which certainty has
a semicolon, though not clearly written.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 107
under hope of peace, till lie had got good footing in
Brittaine by force of arms. Wherefore he answered
the ambassador, that he would put himself into the
King's hands, and make him arbiter of the peace;
and willingly consented that the ambassadors should
straightways pass into Brittaine to signify this his con-
sent, and to know the Duke's mind likewise ; well fore-
seeing that the Duke of Orleans, by whom the Duke
of Brittaine was wholly led, taking himself to be upon
terms irreconcileable with him, would admit of no
treaty of peace ; whereby he should in one both gener-
ally abroad veil over his ambition, and win the repu-
tation of just and moderate proceedings ; and should
withal endear himself in the affections of the King of
England, as one that had committed all to his will;
nay and (which was yet more fine) make faith in him
that although he went on with the war, yet it should
be but with his sword in his hand to bend the stiffness
of the other party to accept of peace ; and so the King
should take no umbrage of his arming and prosecution,
but the treaty to be kept on foot to the very last
instant, till he were master of the field. Which
grounds being by the French King wisely laid, all
things fell out as he expected. For when the English
ambassador came to the court of Brittaine, the Duke
was then scarcely perfect in his memory, and all things
were directed by the Duke of Orleans ; who gave audi-
ence to the chaplain Urswick, and upon his ambassage
delivered made answer in somewhat high terms : That
the Duke of Brittaine having been an host and a kind
of parent or foster-father to the King in his tenderness
of age and weakness of fortune, did look for at this
time from King Henry (the renowned King of Eng-
108 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
land) rather brave troops for his succours than a vain
treaty of peace. And if the King could forget the
good offices of the Duke done unto him aforetime, yet
he knew well he would in his wisdom consider of the
future, how much it imported his own safety and repu-
tation both in foreign parts and with his own people,
not to suffer Brittaine (the old confederates of Eng-
land) to be swallowed up by France, and so many good
ports and strong towns upon the coast be in the com-
mand of so potent a neighbour King, and so ancient
an enemy : And therefore humbly desired the King
to think of this business as his own : and therewith
brake off, and denied any farther conference for treaty.
Urswick returned first to the French King, and
related to him what had passed. Who finding things
to sort to his desire, took hold of them ; and said, That
the ambassador might perceive now that which he for
his part partly imagined before : That considering in
what hands the Duke of Brittaine was, there would be
no peace but by a mixed treaty of force and persua-
sion : And therefore he would go on with one, and
desired the King not to desist from the other : But
for his own part, he did faithfully promise to be still in
the King's power, to rule him in the matter of peace.
This was accordingly represented unto the King by
Urswick at his return, and in such a fashion as if the
treaty were in no sort desperate, but rather stayed for
a better hour, till the hammer had wrought and beat
the party of Brittaine more pliant ; whereupon there
passed continually packets and despatches between the
two Kings, from the one out of desire,1 and from the
other out of dissimulation, about the negotiation of
1 Cupide sed candide.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 109
peace. The French King meanwhile invaded Brit-
taine with great forces, and distressed the city of Nantes
with a strait siege,1 and (as one who, though he had
1 This is Polydore Vergil's statement; who seems, as I said, to have
been the original authority for these transactions; and whose narrative
could not then be corrected by comparison with more authentic records.
Rymer's Foedera however and the Rolls of Parliament enable us now to
detect inaccuracies of date, which show that his means of information
were either imperfect or carelessly used; and the researches of modern
historians into the Breton archives supply several material corrections.
Bacon seems to have taken Polydore's narrative as his ground-work, to
have done his best to make out the meaning of it, and then to have told it
as plainly and luminously as he could. And the meaning of it — the
ideas and designs of the parties, the ends they were aiming at, and the
issues they brought out — he appears to have divined with great accu-
racy ; insomuch that every correction of his story in its details seems to
make the truth of his general interpretation more manifest. But as he was
obliged to fit his narrative into Polydore's frame-work, which contains
several wrong dates, the details are of course very far from accurate. In
a story that hangs well together, a single false date will commonly affect
the whole sequence of events ; and when that false date happens to sep-
arate material points that were in fact connected or to bring together
material points that were in fact separate, it may even affect the whole
series of causes and effects.
Though I know how inconvenient it is for a reader to be continually
called away from the story in the text to listen to a different version of it,
I fear that in this case the inconvenience must be submitted to. The
corrections would not be intelligible to him if the original story were not
fresh in his memory; and if I were to remit them to the appendix, I
should be obliged either to repeat the whole or to interrupt him by refer-
ences to the body of the narrative which would be more troublesome than
references from the text to foot-notes. If he wishes therefore to take a
true impression of Henry's proceedings in the matter of Brittany, I must
ask him to pause at the points which I shall indicate, and hear what I
have to say before he goes on.
In the present instance, Bacon, following Polydore Vergil, has misdated
the siege of Nantes by eight or nine months. It was commenced (see
D'Argentr^, xiii. 38.) on the 19th of June, 1487, — only three days after
the battle of Stoke; and raised on the 6th of August following, a little
before the time when Charles sent his first embassy to Henry. Which if
Bacon had known, he would probably have included the fresh failure of
this enterprise among Henry's reasons (see pp. 106, 112,) for thinking that
Brittany was not in immediate danger from France; especially if he
could have connected it with another fact, which he does not seem to
110 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
no great judgment, yet had that, that he could dissem-
ble home1) the more he did urge the prosecution of
the war, the more he did at the same time urge the
solicitation of the peace ; insomuch as during the siege
of Nantes, after many letters and particular messages,
the better to maintain his dissimulation and to refresh
the treaty, he sent Bernard Daubigny,2 a person of
good quality, to the King, earnestly to desire him to
make an end of the business howsoever. The King
was no less ready to revive and quicken the treaty ;
and thereupon sent three commissioners, the Abbot of
Abingdon, Sir Richard Tunstall, and Chaplain Urs-
wick formerly employed, to do their utmost endeavour
to manage the treaty roundly and strongly.
About this time the Lord Woodvile (uncle to the
Queen) a valiant gentleman and desirous of honour,
sued to the King that he might raise some power of
voluntaries under-hand, and without licence or pass-
have been aware of, though it is mentioned by D'Argentre", xiii. 41., and
which Henry must have known, namely, that the Duke of Brittany did
at that very time (24th Sept. 1487) formally entertain Maximilian's suit
for his daughter.
But though it is not true that Charles was investing Nantes while the
negotiations which Bacon is here speaking of were proceeding, it is true
that he was preparing a fresh invasion of Brittany. (See Daru, iii. p. 134.)
The inaccuracy therefore does not in this case affect the substantial truth
of the narrative.
1 Sed tamen qui simulationum artes in sinu pairis optime didicerat.
2 Bernardum Dobenensem, honestum equitem, according to Polydore. We
learn from the Herald (Lei. iv. p. 236.) that "the Lorde Dawbeney, em-
bassator of Fraunce " was at Windsor on Twelfth Even, 1487-8 : which
may have been the occasion Polydore was thinking of. The embassy
which he represents as sent by Henry in answer (after some delay, it
seems, from the illness of one of the commissioners) was despatched on
the 17th of March, 1487-8. See Rymer. This Bernardus Dobenensis was,
I suppose, Bernard Stewart, Lord Aubigny; a gentleman of Scotch ex-
traction ; who commanded the body of French soldiers that accompanied
Henry to England. See Tytler's Hist, of Scotl. vol. iv. p. 296.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. Ill
port (wherein the King might any ways appear1) go
to the aid of the Duke of Brittaine. The King de-
nied his request, or at least seemed so to do, and laid
strait commandment upon him that he should not stir ;
for that the King thought his honour would suffer
therein, during a treaty to better a party. Neverthe-
less this lord (either being unruly, or out of conceit 2
that the King would not inwardly dislike that which
he would not openly avow,) sailed secretly over into
the Isle of Wight whereof he was governor, and lev-
ied a fair troop of four hundred men, and with them
passed over into Brittaine, and joined himself with the
Duke's forces.3 The news whereof when it came to
the French court, put divers young bloods into such
a fury, as the English ambassadors were not without
peril to be outraged. But the French King, both to
preserve the privilege of ambassadors, and being con-
scious to himself that in the business of peace he him-
self was the greater dissembler of the two, forbad all
injuries of fact or word against their persons or follow-
ers. And presently came an agent from the King to
purge himself touching the Lord Woodvile's going
over, using for a principal argument to demonstrate
that it was without his privity, for that the troops were
so small, as neither had the face of a succour by au-
thority nor could much advance the Briton affairs.
To which message although the French King gave no
full credit, yet he made fair weather4 with the King
and seemed satisfied. Soon after the English ambassa-
dors returned, having two of them been likewise with
1 Absque commeatu autjide publica.
2 Opinione temeraria.
8 Compare W. Paston's letter, 13th May, 1488; quoted in note, p. 105.
* Cum serenitate quadam respondit.
112 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
the Duke of Brittaine l and found things in no other
terms than they were before. Upon their return they
informed the King of the state of the affairs, and how
far the French King was from any true meaning of
peace, and therefore he was now to advise of some
other course. Neither was the King himself led all
this while with credulity merely, as was generally sup-
posed. But his error was not so much facility of
belief, as an ill-measuring of the forces of the other
party. For (as was partly touched before) the
King had cast the business thus with himself. He
took it for granted in his own judgment that the war
of Brittaine, in respect of the strength of the towns
and of the party, could not speedily come to a period.
For he conceived that the counsels of a war that was
undertaken by the French King (then childless2)
against an heir apparent of France, would be very
faint and slow ; and besides that it was not possible
but that the state of France should be embroiled with
some troubles and alterations in favour of the Duke
of Orleans. He conceived likewise that Maximilian
1 According to Lobineau, i. 783, who gives as his authority Regisfre, an
embassage consisting of the three commissioners above mentioned; viz.
the Abbot of Abingdon, Sir Richard Tunstall, and Chaplain Urswick, —
together with Dr. Wardes, — passed from France into Brittany in June,
1488: which agrees with Sismondi's statement, that from the 1st to the
26th of June in that year hostilities were suspended in consequence of
Henry's mediation. Polydore adds that the ambassadors, before they
returned, renewed the truce between Henry and Charles for twelve
months — (renovatis in duodecim menses cum Carolo induciis). They prob-
ably agreed-upon the terms of the truce which was signed by Henry at
Windsor on 14th July, 1488, (see Rymer) and was to continue from that
day till the 17th of January, 1489-90. I do not however find any trace
of the counterpart signed by Charles: and it is not improbable that it
was interrupted before completion by the events which immediately
followed.
2 And unmarried. Coelibe et sine liberis.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 113
King of the Romans was a Prince warlike and potent,
who he made account would give succours to the
Britons roundly. So then judging it would be a work
of time, he laid his plot how he might best make use
of that time for his own affairs. Wherein first he
thought to make his vantage upon his Parliament,
knowing that they being affectionate unto the quarrel
of Brittaine would give treasure largely. Which
treasure as a noise of war might draw forth, so a peace
succeeding might coffer up. And because he knew
his people were hot upon the business, he chose rather
to seem to be deceived and lulled a-sleep by the
French, than to be backward in himself; considering
his subjects were not so fully capable of the reasons
of state which made him hold back. Wherefore to
all these purposes he saw no other expedient than to
set and keep on foot a continual treaty of peace, lay-
ing it down and taking it up again as the occurrence
required. Besides he had in consideration the point
of honour, in bearing the blessed person of a pacifica-
tor. He thought likewise to make use of the envy
that the French King met with by occasion of this war
of Brittaine, in strengthening himself with new alli-
ances ; as namely that of Ferdinando of Spain, with
whom he had ever a consent (even in nature and cus-
toms) ; and likewise with Maximilian, who was par-
ticularly interested. So that in substance he promised
himself1 money, honour, friends, and peace in the
end.2 But those things were too fine to be fortunate
and succeed in all parts ; for that great affairs are
commonly too rough and stubborn to be wrought
1 Satis indulgenter promiseral.
2 Et in fine pacem quakm qptabat.
114 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
upon by the finer edges or points of wit. The King
was likewise deceived in his two main grounds. For
although he had reason to conceive that the counsel
of France would be wary to put the King into a war
against the heir apparent of France ; yet he did not
consider that Charles was not guided by any of the
principal of the blood or nobility,1 but by mean men,
who would make it their master-piece of credit and
favour to give venturous counsels which no great
or wise man durst or would. And for Maximilian,
he was thought then a greater matter than he was ;
his unstable and necessitous courses2 being not then
known.
After consultation with the ambassadors, who
brought him no other news than he expected before
(though he would not seem to know it till then), he
presently summoned his Parliament,3 and in open Par-
1 The translation has "n viris e concilio primariis." According to
Comines, those who governed Charles during the first four years of his
reign were " Le Due et Duchesse de Bourbon, et un Chambellan appele*
le seigneur de Graville, et autres chambelans, qui en ce temps eurent
grand regne." (Liv. vii. c. 1.)
2 Mores ejus instabiles, et conatus ob indigentiam suamfere semper inuliles.
8 Polydore Vergil's words are " suorum principum convocato cmuilio;"
by which he probably meant, as Hall certainly understood him to mean,
that Henry summoned a Parliament. But as no Parliament was sum-
moned between the 9th of November, 1487, and the 13th of January,
1488-9; and as the series of negotiations above detailed could not have
been gone through between September and November; and as this " prin-
cipum concilium" is expressly mentioned as having met before the battle
of St. Aubin, which was fought on the 28th of July, 1488; it is clear that
if he supposed it to be a Parliament (as indeed he must have done, for he
speaks of laws being passed by it) he has made a mistake somewhere. In
supposing that the succours which Henry sent to Brittany were despatched
immediately after the battle of St. Aubin, and before the death of the
Duke of Brittany, he was certainly mistaken. The Duke died on the 8th
of September, 1488; the succours did not set out before March, 1488-9.
Modern historians have pointed out or avoided these mistakes; but have
not, as it seems to me, discovered the true order and concatenation of
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 115
liament propounded the cause of Brittaine to both
events. I think it will be found that this " principum concilium" before
which Henry propounded the case of Brittany, was not a Parliament, but
a " Great Council; " (so called in contradistinction to the " ordinary" or
" continual council," and in those days well known it seems by that
name;) i. e. a council consisting not only of lords, spiritual and temporal,
joined with the King's privy council (as has been supposed); but also of
principal persons of various classes, including lawyers, burgesses, and
merchants; composed in short of much the same elements as a Parlia-
ment; and specially summoned by the King for consultation in great af-
fairs (for a fuller justification of which conjecture see Appendix No. I.):
— that the occasion of its being summoned was not the return of the am-
bassadors out of France just before the battle of St. Aubin ; but the issue
of that battle, with the events which immediately followed, including the
Duke's death and the new pretensions of the French King (see note 1.
p. 118) : — and that the time of its meeting was the beginning of November,
1488, only two months after the Duke's death. We know from the Herald's
narrative (Cott. MSS. Jul. xii. fo. 49.) — an evidence almost conclusive on
such a point — that after Whitsuntide in that year (which was on the 25th
of May)," all tfie summer following'''' the King "hunted and sported him
merely;" but that after keeping his Allhallow-tide (1st November) at
Windsor, " he removed to Westminster, to the gretest conseill that was many
yers withoute the name of parliamenV We know from the same authority
that " there were at that season many ambassadors in England from for-
eign countries." We know from Rymer that on the 11th of December fol-
lowing, ambassadors were despatched from England to France, to Brittany,
to Spain, and to Flanders. We know that on the 23rd of December com-
missions were out for raising a body of archers for the succour of Brittany.
We know that Parliament met on the 13th of the following month, and
voted liberal supplies for that enterprise. And we know lastly that soon
after the Parliament broke up these succours were despatched. If then
we suppose that Henry still hoped to carry his ends by negotiation until
he heard of the battle of St. Aubin; that the result of that battle was not
only unexpected, but so decisive that it did in fact put an end to the war
for the time (which is true; for the treaty of Verger, which established
Charles in possession of all he had won, was concluded (D'Argentre", xiii.
48.) on the 21st August), and left him no room for action, until the acces-
sion of the young Duchess and the questions arising thereupon opened a
new chapter; that immediately upon this he summoned a Great Council,
partly that he might feel the sense of the nation, and partly that he might
pledge them to the support of the war before he committed himself; and
that it was to this Great Council that he now (i. e. in the beginning
of November, 1488) propounded the case and appealed for advice; it will
be found I think that the events hang together more naturally, and suit
better with the fixed data established by state documents.
116 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
houses by his chancellor Morton * Archbishop of Can-
terbury, who spake to this effect.
1 This fact is not mentioned by Polydore, nor I think by any of the
Chroniclers; from which one may suspect that Bacon had some inde-
pendent source of information with regard to this speech. The speech
itself however is of course to be taken, not as a report of what the Chan-
cellor really said, but as a representation of what Bacon imagined that
such a person, in such circumstances, with such ends in view, would or
should have said. The same is to be understood of all the speeches in the
book; the amount of invention varying inversely as the amount of actual
information. If he had had a full report of the speech actually spoken, he
would have given, not a transcript certainly, but the substance of it in the
best and fewest words ; still keeping the form of the first person. Where
he had no means of knowing more than the general tenour and purpose of
what was spoken, he would fill up the outline from his own head, and make
a speech of such tenour and purpose, — the best he could. It is this which
gives to these speeches their peculiar interest and value: they are so many
statements of the case as Bacon conceived it, viewed from the point at
which the speakers stood, and presented in a dramatic form.
This, I need hardly add, is according to the old rule of historical com-
position, practised by all the classical historians, and distinctly explained
and avowed by Thucydides, the best and trust worthiest of them all ; and
Bacon could never have imagined that his speeches would be taken in any
other sense. But since I find Dr. Henry gravely recording his suspicion
" that these speeches were made by the noble historian who hath recorded
them;" and the author of the chapter on "National Industry" in the
Pictorial History of England criticising and commenting upon and drawing
inferences from the words of this speech, as if it had been a document of
the time; and Lord Campbell treating it as a blemish in the work that it
is " filled up with proclamations and long speeches," (as if they were so
much rubbish; when the speeches are in fact the most original part of it);
— I must suppose that the thing is not so well understood now-a-days as
to make this note superfluous.
Whether the pi-actice is a good one or not, is another question. My own
opinion is that the reader is less liable to be deceived by history written
upon this principle than upon the modern plan, though the modern be ap-
parently the more scrupulous. The records of the past are not complete
enough to enable the most diligent historian to give a connected narrative,
in which there shall not be many parts resting upon guesses or inferences
or unauthenticated rumours. He may guess for himself, or he may report
other people's guesses; but guesses there must be. And if he be a wise
man and curious about the truth, those portions of his narrative which
have most of his own will probably be nearest the truth. The advantage
of the old practice is, that the invention appears in the undisguised form
of invention; whereas the modern practice, by scrupulously eschewing
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 117
" My lords and masters, the King's Grace, our Sov-
ereign Lord, hath commanded me to declare unto you
the causes that have moved him at this time to summon
this his Parliament ; which I shall do in few words ;
craving pardon of his Grace and you all, if I perforin
it not as I would.
" His Grace doth first of all let you know that he
retaineth in thankful memory the love and loyalty
shewed to him by you at your last meeting,1 in estab-
lishment of his royalty, freeing and discharging of his
partakers, and confiscation of his traitors and rebels ;
more than which could not come from subjects to their
sovereign in one action. This he taketh so well at your
hands, as he hath made it a resolution to himself to
communicate with so loving and well approved subjects
everything like avowed and deliberate invention, leaves it to be supposed
that what remains is all fact; that when the writer tells you what this
man said or that man thought, — carefully keeping in the third person, or
quoting from a previous writer, — he is telling you something that did
really happen : whereas in most cases of the kind he is but reporting his
own or another man's conjecture, just as much as if he had sate down
deliberately to compose a soliloquy or a speech in the first person.
1 It seems therefore that Bacon believed this to be Henry's second Par-
liament; the Parliament in 3 //. VII. ; under which description he was no
doubt familiar with the records of it. But he did not know, and had not
perhaps any ready means of ascertaining, in what month of* Henry's third
year, which extended from August 22, 1487, to August 21, 1488, it met.
We have seen that in speaking of the coronation of the Queen (p. 94.) he
makes no allusion to the fact that this Parliament was then sitting; which
considering its importance both as a legislative and as a money-voting
Parliament, (for they granted — in consideration of the rebellion just
passed, I imagine, rather than of the war to come — two fifteenths and
tenths,) he would naturally have done in that place. I have little doubt
that, following Polydore's narrative, as all previous historians had done,
and not having access to the Parliament Rolls to correct it by, he believed
this second Parliament to have met in the summer of 1488. It must be
supposed that authentic records as to the date of Henry's Parliaments
were not easily accessible, when so diligent and original an explorer as
Stowe failed to detect these errors.
118 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
in all affairs that are of public nature at home or
abroad.
" Two therefore are the causes of your present as-
sembling : the one a foreign business ; the other matters
of government at home.
" The French King (as no doubt ye have heard)
maketh at this present hot war upon the Duke of Brit-
taine. His army is now before Nantes,1 and holdeth
it straitly besieged, being the principal city, if not in
ceremony and preeminence, yet in strength and wealth,
of that duchy : ye may guess at his hopes, by his at-
tempting of the hardest part of the war first. The
cause of this war he knoweth best. He alledgeth the
entertaining and succouring of the Duke of Orleans
and some other French lords, whom the King taketh
for his enemies. Others divine of other matters. Both
parts have by their ambassadors divers times prayed
the King's aids ; the French King, aids or neutrality ;
the Britons, aids simply ; for so their case requireth.
The King, as a Christian Prince and blessed son of the
holy church, hath offered himself as a mediator to treat
a peace between them. The French King yieldeth to
1 This is consistent with Polydore's narrative: but it is a mistake, what-
ever date you assign to " now." The siege of Nantes had been raised on
the 6th of August, 1487. (See note 1. p. 109.) The Chancellor however,
speaking in November, 1488, had in fact a stronger case than could have
been assigned to him at the time Bacon supposed him to be speaking.
The victory of St. Aubin had given Charles all, and more than all, he
originally pretended. The party of the Duke of Orleans was overthrown;
the Duke himself was his prisoner; he had been secured by treaty in the
possession of all the places he had won; yet he was now, upon the Duke
of Brittany's death, claiming the right of guardianship over the young
Duchess, and in the mean time proceeding in his conquests and taking
town after town in Brittany. (See Daru, iii. p. 148., and compare the
King's letter to Lord Oxford, quoted in note p. 148.; which shows how far
the French had advanced into Brittany before the end of March, 1489.)
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 119
treat, but will not stay the prosecution of the war.
The Britons, that desire peace most, hearken to it
least ; not upon confidence or stiffness, but upon dis-
trust of true meaning ; seeing the war goes on. So as
the King, after as much pains and care to effect a peace
as ever he took in any business, not being able to re-
move the prosecution on the one side nor the distrust
on the other caused by that prosecution, hath let fall
the treaty ; not repenting of it, but despairing of it
now, as not likely to succeed. Therefore by this nar-
rative you now understand the state of the question,
whereupon the King prayeth your advice ; which is no
other, but whether he shall enter into an auxiliary and
defensive war for the Britons against France ?
" And the better to open your understandings in this
affair, the King hath commanded me to say somewhat
to you from him of the persons that do intervene in
this business ; and somewhat of the consequence there-
of, as it hath relation to this kingdom ; and somewhat
of the example of it in general ; making nevertheless
no conclusion or judgment of any point, until his Grace
hath received your faithful and politic advices.
" First for the King our sovereign himself, who is
the principal person you are to eye in this business ; his
Grace doth profess that he truly and constantly desir-
eth to reign in peace : but his Grace saith he will
neither buy peace with dishonour, nor take it up at
interest of danger to ensue ; but shall think it a good
change, if it please God to change the inward troubles
and seditions wherewith he hath been hitherto exer-
cised into an honourable foreign war.
u And for the other two persons in this action, the
French King and the Duke of Brittaine, his Grace doth
120 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
declare unto you, that they be the men unto whom he
is of all other friends and allies most bounden ; the one
having held over him his hand of protection from the
tyrant ; the other having reached forth unto him his
hand of help for the recovery of his kingdom ; so that
his affection toward them in his natural person is upon
equal terms. And whereas you may have heard that
his Grace was enforced to fly out of Brittaine into
France for doubts of being betrayed ; his Grace would
not in any sort have that reflect upon the Duke of
Brittaine in defacement of his former benefits ; for that
he is thoroughly informed that it was but the practice
of some corrupt persons about him, during the time of
his sickness, altogether without his consent or privity.
But howsoever these things do interest his Grace in his
particular, yet he knoweth well that the higher bond
that tieth him to procure by all means the safety and
welfare of his loving subjects, doth disinteress him of
these obligations of gratitude, otherwise than thus ;
that if his Grace be forced to make a war he do it
without passion or ambition.
" For the consequence of this action towards this
kingdom, it is much as the French King's intention is.
For if it be no more but to range his subjects to reason
who bear themselves stout upon the strength of the
Duke of Brittaine,1 it is nothing to us. But if it be in
the French King's purpose, — or if it should not be in
his purpose, yet if it shall follow all one as if it were
sought, — that the French King shall make a province
of Brittaine and join it to the crown of France ; then
it is worthy the consideration how this may import
England, as well in the increasement of the greatness
1 This clause is omitted in the translation.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 121
of France, by the addition of such a country that
stretcheth his boughs unto our seas, as in depriving this
nation and leaving it naked of so firm and assured con-
federates as the Britons have always been. For then
it will come to pass that, whereas not long since this
realm was mighty upon the continent, first in territory
and after in alliance, in respect of Burgundy and Brit-
taine, which were confederates indeed, but dependent
confederates ; 2 now the one being already cast partly
into the greatness of France and partly into that of
Austria, the other is like wholly to be cast into the
greatness of France ; and this island shall remain con-
fined in effect within the salt waters, and girt about
with the coast countries of two mighty monarchs.
" For the example, it resteth likewise upon the same
question, upon the French King's intent. For if Brit-
tame be carried and swallowed up by France, as the
world abroad (apt to impute and construe the actions
of Princes to ambition) conceive it will, then it is an
example very dangerous and universal, that the lesser
neighbour estate should be devoured of the greater.
For this may be the case of Scotland towards England ;
of Portugal towards Spain ; of the smaller estates of
Italy towards the greater ; and so of Germany ; or as if
some of you of the commons might not live and dwell
safely besides some of these great lords. And the
bringing in of this example will be chiefly laid to the
King's charge, as to him that was most interested 2 and
most able to forbid it.3 But then on the other side
there is so fair a pretext on the French King's part
1 Fcederati ex hujus regni consiliis pendentes.
2 So MS.
8 Qui Mud etiam cum bono republicce sum impedire maxime potuisset.
122 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
(and yet pretext is never wanting to power) in regard
the danger imminent to his own estate is such as may
make this enterprise seem rather a work of necessity
than of ambition, as doth in reason correct the danger
of the example ; for that the example of that which is
done in a man's own defence cannot be dangerous, be-
cause it is in another's power to avoid it. But in all
this business, the King remits himself to your grave
and mature advice, whereupon he purposeth to rely."
This was the effect of the Lord Chancellor's speech
touching the cause of Brittaine ; for the King had
commanded him to carry it so as to affect the Parlia-
ment towards the business ; but without engaging the
King in any express declaration.
The Chancellor went on :
" For that which may concern the government at
home, the King hath commanded me to say unto you ;
that he thinketh there was never any King (for the
small time that he hath reigned) had greater and juster
cause of the two contrary passions of joy and sorrow,
than his Grace hath ; joy, in respect of the rare and
visible favours of Almighty God, in girting the impe-
rial sword upon his side, and assisting the same his
sword against all his enemies, and likewise in blessing
him with so many good and loving servants and sub-
jects, which have never failed to give him faithful
counsel, ready obedience, and courageous defence ; sor-
row, for that it hath not pleased God to suffer him to
sheath his sword (as he greatly desired, otherwise than
for administration of justice,) but that he hath been
forced to draw it so oft, to cut off traitorous and
disloyal subjects, whom it seems God hath left (a few
amongst many good) as the Canaanites amongst the
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 123
people of Israel, to be thorns in their sides, to tempt
and try them ; though the end hath been always
(God's name be blessed therefore) that the destruction
hath fallen upon their own heads. Wherefore his
Grace saith that he seeth that it is not the blood spilt
in the field that will save the blood in the city ; nor
the marshal's ' sword that will set this kingdom in per-
fect peace : but that the true way is to stop the seeds
of sedition and rebellion in their beginnings, and for
that purpose to devise, confirm, and quicken good and
wholesome laws against riots and unlawful assemblies
of people and all combinations and confederacies of
them by liveries, tokens, and other badges of factious
dependence ; that the peace of the land may by these
ordinances, as by bars of iron, be soundly bound in
and strengthened, and all force both in court, coun-
try, and private houses be supprest.
" The care hereof, which so much concerneth your-
selves, and which the nature of the times doth instant-
ly call for, his Grace commends to your wisdoms.
u And because it is the King's desire that this peace
wherein he hopeth to govern and maintain you, do not
bear only unto you leaves, for you to sit under the
shade of them in safety, but also should bear you fruit
of riches, wealth, and plenty ; therefore his Grace
prays you to take into consideration matter of trade,
as also the manufactures of the kingdom, and to re-
press the bastard and barren employment of moneys to
usury and unlawful exchanges ; that they may be (as
their natural use is) turned upon commerce, and law-
ful and royal trading ; and likewise that our people be
set awork in arts and handicrafts, that the realm may
1 So ed. 1622. The MS. has " Marshall; " which is perhaps right.
124 HISTOEY OF KING HENRY VII.
subsist more of itself, that idleness be avoided, and the
draining out of our treasure for foreign manufactures
stopped. But you are not to rest here only, but to
provide further that whatsoever merchandise shall be
brought in from beyond the seas may be employed
upon the commodities of this land ; whereby the king-
dom's stock of treasure may be sure to be kept from
being diminished by any overtrading of the foreigner.
" And lastly because the King is well assured that
you would not have him poor that wishes you rich ;
he doubteth not but that you will have care, as well
to maintain his revenews of customs and all other
natures, as 1 also to supply him with your loving aids,
if the case shall so require : the rather for that you
know the King is a good husband, and but a steward
in effect for the public, and that what comes from you
is but as moisture drawn from the earth, which gathers
into a cloud and falls back upon the earth again ; and
you know well how the kingdoms about you grow
more and more in greatness, and the times are stir-
ring ; and therefore not fit to find the King with an
empty purse. More I have not to say to you, and
wish that what hath been said had been better ex-
pressed: but that your wisdoms and good affections
will supply. God bless your doings." 2
It was no hard matter to dispose and affect the Par-
liament in this business ; 3 as well in respect of the
emulation between the nations,4 and the envy at the
late growth of the French monarchy ; as in regard
i So Ed. 1622. The MS. has " and also."
2 The Latin translation adds Heme orationem Cancellarius habuit, non
comptam eerie, sed solidam et perspicuam.
3 i. e. the business of Brittany. Ad islud Britannia negotium.
4 Inter nationes Anglice et Gallue.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 125
of the danger to suffer the French to make their ap-
proaches upon England, by obtaining so goodly a
maritime province, full of sea-towns and havens, that
might do mischief to the English, either by invasion
or by interruption of traffic.
The Parliament was also moved with the point of
oppression ; for although the French seemed to speak
reason,1 yet arguments are ever with multitudes too
weak for suspicions. Wherefore they did advise the
King roundly to embrace the Britons' quarrel, and to
send them speedy aids ; and with much alacrity and
forwardness granted to the King a great rate of sub-
sidy 2 in contemplation of these aids. But the King,
1 This might perhaps have been said in July, 1488; but hardly in No-
vember, after the Duke of Orleans and all that party were overthrown.
2 The Parliament of November, 1487, had granted (though not with
any view to the case of Brittany) two fifteenths and tenths.' The Parlia-
ment of January, 1488-9, granted (and this was expressly for the suc-
cours to Brittany) " the tenth penny on men's lands and goods movable "
— a rate which was expected to produce 75,000/. But what could have
been granted in November, 1488, when there was no Parliament but only
a Great Council? I take it that though a Great Council could not (prop-
erly speaking) grant a subsidy, yet the members composing it might have
given the King sufficient security, either by promise or by actual loan,
that if a Parliament were summoned a subsidy would be granted. In the
first year of Henry IV. a Great Council, summoned for advice on a ques-
tion of peace or war, advised war, and (in order to avoid the necessity of
summoning a Parliament and imposing a general tax) agreed upon a grant
of money from themselves. A Great Council, summoned by Henry VII.
in his twelfth year (as we shall see further on) to advise of war with Scot-
land, advised war, and for means to carry it on, lent [prested] the King
"every one for his part great sums of ready money; " and recommended, it
seems, the raising of 40,000/. more by privy seals. That Great Council sat
from the 24th of October to the 6th of November, 1496 ; and was followed
by a Parliament, January 16, 1496-7, which granted the King for the
Scotch war two aids and two fifteens. That this was the course taken
with regard to the Scotch war in 1496, is as certain, though it is not noticed
in any of our histories, as anything can be that happened so long ago: and
I suppose the same course to have been taken with regard to the case of
Brittany, the occasions being in all respects analogous. It is observable
126 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
both to keep a decency towards the French King, to
whom he profest himself to be obliged, and indeed
desirous rather to show war than to make it, sent
new solemn ambassadors * to intimate unto him the
decree of his estates, and to iterate his motion that the
French would desist from hostility ; or if war must
follow, to desire him to take it in good part, if at the
motion of his people, who were sensible of the cause
of the Britons as their ancient friends and confeder-
ates, he did send them succours ; with protestation
nevertheless that, to save all treaties and laws of
friendship, he had limited his forces,2 to proceed in
aid of the Britons, but in no wise to war upon the
French, otherwise than as they maintained the posses-
sion of Brittaine. But before this formal ambassage
arrived, the party of the Duke had received a great
that the old chronicler (Cott. Vitel. A. xvi. f. 161.), who was either
Fabyan himself or Fabyan's great authority (for Fabyan's printed chron-
icle of this reign is but an abstract from this MS.), being evidently a con-
temporary, and a citizen of London, attentive enough to matters of loan
and taxation, says expressly that at this Great Council (the nature of
which he plainly understood and did not at all confound it with the Par-
liament which followed, and which he notices in its place) "was granted
unto the King for the defence of the Scots 120,000/." And therefore it
may very well be that in like manner this "great rate of subsidy," that
was given to Henry in contemplation of the aids to Brittany, was (popu-
larly speaking) granted by the Great Council of November, 1488, though
the legal authority for levying it had to wait for the Parliament which
met in the following January.
1 This again comes from Polydore; an error in point of date growing
out of the previous error with regard to the Council. There are no traces
in Rymer of such an embassy in July, 1488; but on the 11th of December
following, — between the breaking up of the Great Council and the issu-
ing of the commission for levying a body of archers for the succour of
Brittany, — Christopher Urswick, Thomas Warde, and Stephen Fryon
were sent to treat a peace between England and France, and also between
France and the Duchess of Brittany. And this was no doubt the solemn
embassy here spoken of.
2 Copiis suis imperare in animo habere.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 127
blow, and grew to manifest deelination. For near the
town of St. Alban in Brittaine a battle had been
given, where the Britons were overthrown, and the
Duke of Orleans and the Prince of Orange taken
prisoners, there being slain on the Britons' part six
thousand men, and amongst them the Lord Woodvile,
and almost all his soldiers, valiantly fighting. And
of the French part, one thousand two hundred, with
their leader James Galeot a great commander.
When the news of this battle came over into Eng-
land, it was time for the King (who now 1 had no
subterfuge to continue further treaty, and saw before
his eyes that Brittaine went so speedily for lost, con-
trary to his hopes ; knowing also that with his people
and foreigners both, he sustained no small envy and
disreputation for his former delays,) to dispatch with
all possible speed his succours into Brittaine ; which
he did under the conduct of Robert Lord Brooke, to
the number of eight thousand, choice men and well
armed ; who having a fair wind, in few hours land-
ed in Brittaine, and joined themselves forthwith to
those Briton forces that remained after the defeat,
and marched straight on to find the enemy, and en-
camped fast by them. The French wisely husband-
ing the possession of a victory, and well acquainted
with the courage of the English, especially when they
are fresh, kept themselves within their trenches, being
strongly lodged, and resolved not to give battle. But
meanwhile to harass and weary the English, they did
upon all advantages set upon them with their light
horse ; wherein nevertheless they received commonly
loss, especially by means of the English archers.
1 The MS. omits now.
128 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
But upon these achievements Francis Duke of Brit-
taine deceased ; an accident that the King might easily
have foreseen, and ought to have reckoned upon and
provided for ; but that the point of reputation, when
news first came of the battle lost, (that somewhat
must be done) did overbear the reason of war.
After the Duke's decease, the principal persons of
Brittaine, partly bought, partly thro' faction, put all
things into confusion ; so as the English not finding
head or body with whom to join their forces, and
being in jealousy of friends as well as in danger of
enemies, and the winter begun, returned home five
months after their landing.1 So the battle of St. Al-
1 All this comes from Polydore, and appears to be quite wrong. The
true story would have told much better ; being much more consistent with
Bacon's idea of Henry's character and policy. It is true that Henry had
shown some want of foresight in not perceiving the imminence of the
danger which threatened Brittany, and that he had thereby let the time
slip when he might have interfered most effectually to preserve her against
the encroachment of France. But it is not at all true that he allowed
himself to be hurried by popular clamour and a desire to save appear-
ances into an ill-considered and fruitless enterprise.
Till he heard of the battle of St. Aubin (28th of July, 1488) he had
hoped to save Brittany by negotiation. That battle took him by surprise,
not expecting to be called upon for immediate interference by arms, and
no wajr prepared for it (the less because the successful rebellion in Scot-
land and the accession of a new King in the middle of the preceding
month left him in doubt what he was to expect from that side); and it
was then too late. The blow was too decisive to be retrieved by an array
of assistance; and even if Henry had been disposed to help the Duke of
Brittany in that way, it would not have been in his power : before he
could have got his army ready, the Duke had bound himself by the treaty
of Verger, or Sable" as it is sometimes called, (August 21, 1488), not to call
in foreign auxiliaries. It was not till after the Duke's death (September
9, 1488), when the French King had shown himself not content to rest upon
his recent advantages, but was evidently aiming to possess himself of the
entire duchy, that Henry determined to take more active measures for the
purpose of checking him. The winter being then so near that nothing
more could be done on either side for that season, he had plenty of time
before him ; but he used it for preparation, not for delay. He first, by his
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 129
ban, the death of the Duke, and the retire of the
English succours, were (after some time) the causes
of the loss of that duchy ; which action some ac-
counted as a blemish of the King's judgment, but
most but as the misfortune of his times.
But howsoever the temporary fruit of the Parlia-
ment in their aid and advice given for Brittaine, took
not nor prospered not ; yet the lasting fruit of Parlia-
ment, which is good and wholesome laws, did prosper,
Great Council, made himself sure of the support of his people. He then
proceeded to make his terms with Brittany; careful and rather hard terms,
framed to secure him against pecuniary loss. At the same time he gave
the French King due warning of his course; and made arrangements with
Flanders and Spain for concerted action. Lastly, he summoned his Parlia-
ment and obtained a formal vote of supply; and as soon as the season was
far enough advanced for a new campaign, he had a body of 6000 archers
ready to sail. So that all things were cared for, and yet no time lost.
Nor can it be said that his measures were unsuccessful; as I shall ex-
plain in a subsequent note; for to explain it here would confuse our dates
by anticipating the events of the next year. It is enough in this place to
remember that at the time of which Bacon is now speaking, namely the
winter of 1488, the English force, instead of returning unsuccessful, was
only preparing to go ; and that the matters related in the following pages
all took place either before the expedition or while it was going on.
The story of the return of the English succours after an unsuccessful
campaign within five months of their setting out, grew probably out of
some loose statement or incidental report of a circumstance which we
learn from the Paston Letters (vol. v. p. 355.). About the end of January,
1488-9, a month or more before the forces under Lord Brooke were ready
to sail, some gentlemen did go over to Brittany, but returned to England
immediately without having landed; finding the French too strong prob-
ably for so small a force. "Those gentlemen" (says Margery Paston,
writing from London on the 10th of February, 1488-9 — not 1487-8, as the
editor supposes) " that took shipping to have gone over into Bretaigne
upon a fortnight ago — that is to say, Sir Richard Edgecomb, the Comp-
troller, Sir Robert Clifford, Sir John Trobylvylle, and John Motton, Ser-
jeant porter, — be arrived again upon the coast of England, save only Sir
Richard Edgecomb, who landed in Bretaigne and there was in a town
called Morlaix, which anon upon his coming was besieged with the
Frenchmen, and so escaped hardly with his life; the which town the
Frenchmen have gotten, and also the town called Brest; howbeit the
castle holdeth, as we hear say."
VOL. XI. 9
130 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
and doth yet continue till this day.1 For according
to the Lord Chancellor's admonition, there were that
Parliament2 divers excellent laws ordained, concern-
ing the points which the 'King recommended.
First, the authority of the Star-chamber, which be-
fore subsisted by the ancient common laws of the
realm, was confirmed in certain cases by act of Par-
liament.3 This court is one of the safest and noblest
institutions of this kingdom. For in the distribution
of courts of ordinary justice, (besides the high court
of Parliament,) in which distribution the King's bench
holdeth the pleas of the crown ; the Common-place,
pleas civil ; 4 the Exchequer, pleas concerning the
King's revenew ; and the Chancery, the Pretorian
power for mitigating the rigour of law, in case of ex-
tremity, by the conscience of a good man ; there was
nevertheless always reserved a high and preeminent
power to the King's counsel in causes that might in
example or consequence concern the state of the com-
monwealth ; which if they were criminal, the counsel
used to sit in the chamber called the Star-chamber ; if
civil, in the white-chamber or White-hall. And as the
Chancery had the Pretorian power for equity, so the
i So MS. Ed. 1622 has " to this day."
2 This is a further proof that Bacon supposed the case of Brittany to
have been propounded in Henry's second Parliament. Almost all the laws
which are mentioned in the following paragraphs were passed by the Par-
liament which met on the 7th November, 1487: just a year before the
meeting of the Great Council.
8 3 H. 7. c. 1.
4 A very politic distribution, according to the translation. In qua Curia
Band Regis, criminibus quae, contra coronam commitluntur ; curia Band
Communis, litibus civilibus ; curia Scaccarii, causis quae ad reditus et proven-
tus regis spectant ; et Curias Cancellarice, causis qua mitigationem rigoris
juris ex arbitrio boni viri, ad exemplum juris Prcetorii, merentur, fwlitice
admodum assignatce sunt.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 131
Star-chamber had the Censorian power for offences
under the degree of capital. This court of Star-
chamber is compounded of good elements ; for it con-
sisteth of four kinds of persons ; counsellors, peers,
prelates, and chief judges : it discerneth also princi-
pally of four kinds of causes ; forces, frauds, crimes
various of stellionate, and the inchoations or middle
acts towards crimes capital or hainous not actually
committed or perpetrated. But that which was prin-
cipally aimed at by this act was force,1 and the two
chief supports of force, combination of multitudes, and
maintenance or headship of great persons.
From the general peace of the country the King's
care went on to the peace of the King's house, and the
security of his great officers and counsellors. But this
law 2 was somewhat of a strange composition and tem-
per. That if any of the King's servants under the
degree of a lord, do conspire the death of any of the
King's counsel, or lord of the realm, it is made capi-
tal.3 This law was thought to be procured by the
Lord Chancellor, who being a stern and haughty
man, and finding he had some mortal enemies in
court, provided for his own safety ; drowning the
envy of it in a general law, by communicating the
privilege with all other counsellors and peers ; and
yet not daring to extend it further than to the King's
servants in check-roll, lest it should have been too
harsh to the gentlemen and other commons of the
kingdom, who might have thought their ancient liberty
and the clemency of the laws of England invaded, if
1 Suppressio turbarum illicitarum.
2 3 H. 7. c. 14.
8 t. e. whether it be effected or not — /actum est crimen, licet res peracta
non/uerit, capitale.
132 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
the will in any case of felony a should be made the deed.
And yet the reason which the act yieldeth (that is to
say, that he that conspireth the death of counsellors
may be thought indirectly and by a mean to conspire
the death of the King himself) is indifferent to all
subjects as well as to servants in court. But it seem-
eth this sufficed to serve the Lord Chancellor's turn at
this time ; but yet he lived to need a general law ; for
that he grew afterwards as odious to the country as
he was then to the court.
From the peace of the King's house the King's care
extended to the peace of private houses and families ;
for there was an excellent moral law 2 moulded thus :
The taking and carrying away of women forcibly and
against their will (except female wards and bond-
women) was made capital : the Parliament wisely
and justly conceiving, that the obtaining of women
by force into possession 3 (howsoever afterwards assent
might follow by allurements) was but a rape drawn
forth in length, because the first force drew on all the
rest.
There was made also another law * for peace in gen-
eral, and repressing of murders and manslaughters, and
was in amendment of the common laws of the realm ;
being this : That whereas by the common law the
King's suit, in case of homicide, did expect the year
and the day, allowed to the party's suit by way of ap-
peal ; 5 and that it was found by experience that the
1 i. e. in any case under the degree of treason — alias quam in criminibus
Icesce majestatis.
2 3 H. 7. c. 3.
3 Abripiendi fmminas per vim in possessionem extraneorum.
4 3 H. 7. c. 2.
6 i. e. to the wife and heir of the man killed, to prosecute in their own
name. Quod spatium uxori et hceredi occisi datum est ut nomine proprio
accusationem peragerent.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 133
party was many times compounded with, and many
times wearied with the suit, so that in the end such
suit was let fall ; and by that time the matter was in
a manner forgotten, and thereby prosecution at the
King's suit by indictment (which is ever best flagrante
crimine) neglected ; it was ordained 1 that the suit by
indictment might be taken as well at any time within
the year and the day as after ; not prejudicing never-
theless the party's suit.
The King began also then, as well in wisdom as in
justice, to pare a little the privilege of clergy ; ordain-
ing that clerks convict should be burned in the hand,2
— both because they might taste of some corporal pun-
ishment, and that they might carry a brand of infamy.
But for this good act's sake, the King himself was
after branded by Perkin's proclamation for an exe-
crable breaker of the rites of holy church.
Another law was made for the better peace of the
country, by which law the King's officers and farmers
were to forfeit their places and holds, in case of unlaw-
ful retainer 3 or partaking in routs and unlawful assem-
blies.
These were the laws that were made for repressing
of force, which those times did chiefly require ; and
were so prudently framed as they are found fit for all
succeeding times, and so continue to this day.
1 So ed. 1622. The MS. has " ordered."
2 4 H. 7. c. 13. This therefore belongs to the year 1489-90. Bacon per-
haps confounded these two sessions ; there being no hint in Polydore of a
Parliament being called in January, '88-9. " Clerks convict " are clergy
convicted of capital crimes. Clericl capitalis criminis convicti. This act
was passed at the last meeting of this Parliament, Jan. 25th — Feb. 27th,
1489-90. See Stat, of Realm, p. 524. note.
8 Si famulitiis nobilium aut aliorum, nisi domestici essent, se aggregarent.
3 H. 7. c. 15.
134 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
There were also made good and politic laws that
Parliament against usury,1 which is the bastard use
of money ; and against unlawful chievances and ex-
changes,2 which is bastard usury ; and also for the
security of the King's customs ; and for the employ-
ment of the procedures of foreign commodities, brought
in by merchants strangers,3 upon the native commodi-
ties of the realm ; together with some other laws of
less importance.
But howsoever the laws made in that Parliament
did bear good and wholesome fruit ; yet the subsidy
granted at the same time bore4 a fruit that proved
harsh and bitter. All was inned at last into the
King's barn ; but it was after a storm. For when
the commissioners entered into the taxation of the
subsidy in Yorkshire and the bishoprick of Durham,
the people upon a sudden grew into great mutiny, and
said openly that they had endured of late years a thou-
sand miseries, and neither could nor would pay the
subsidy. This no doubt proceeded not simply of any
present necessity, but much by reason of the old hu-
mour of those countries, where the memory of King
Richard was so strong, that it lay like lees in the
bottom of men's hearts, and if the vessel was but
stirred it would come up ; and no doubt it was partly
also by the instigation of some factious malcontents
i 3 H. 7. c. 6.
2 lllicita excambia et contractus Jictos. 3 H. 7. c. 7.
8 So MS. Ed. 1622 has '* merchant strangers." See note 2. p. 100.
4 So MS. Ed. 1622 has "bare." The events which follow were cer-
tainly in the spring of 1489. I presume therefore that the tax which
caused the combustion was that of the tenth penny upon lands and goods
moveable, granted in the Parliament of January, 1488-9, not the two
fifteenths and tenths granted in 1487.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 135
that bare principal ' stroke amongst them. Hereupon
the commissioners, being somewhat astonished, deferred
the matter unto the Earl of Northumberland, who was
the principal man of authority in those parts. The
Earl forthwith wrote unto the court, signifying to the
King plainly enough in what flame he found the people
of those countries, and praying the King's direction.
The King wrote back peremptorily that he would not
have one penny abated of that which had been granted
to him by Parliament ; both because it might encour-
age other countries to pray the like release or mitiga-
tion ; and chiefly because he would never endure that
the base multitude should frustrate the authority of
the Parliament, wherein their votes and consents were
concluded. Upon this dispatch from court, the Earl
assembled the principal justices and freeholders of the
country ; and speaking to them in the2 imperious
language wherein the King had written to him, which
needed not (save that an harsh business was unfortu-
nately fallen into the hands of a harsh man), did not
only irritate the people, but make them conceive by
the stoutness and haughtiness of delivery of the King's
errand,3 that himself was the author or principal per-
suader of that counsel : whereupon the meaner sort
routed together, and suddenly assailing4 the earl in
his hoiise, slew him 5 and divers of his servants ; and
rested not there, but creating for their leader Sir John
Egremond, a factious person, and one that had of a
1 So ed. 1662. The MS. has " principally."
■ So MS. Ed. 1622 has "that."
8 Ex acerbitate verborum ejus quce tanquam regis ipsius verba retuleral.
4 So ed. 1622. The MS. has » assailed."
6 This, according to Stowe, was on the 28th of April, 1489.
136 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
long time borne an ill talent towards the King,1 and
being animated also by a base fellow, called John
a Chamber, a very boutefeu, who bore much sway
amongst the vulgar and populace,2 entered into open
rebellion, and gave out in flat terms that they would
go against King Henry and fight with him for the
maintenance of their liberties.
When the King was advertised of this new insurrec-
tion (being almost a fever that took him every year),
after his manner little troubled therewith, he sent
Thomas Earl of Surrey (whom he had a little before
not only released out of the Tower and pardoned, but
also received to especial favour) with a competent power
against the rebels, who fought with the principal band
of them and defeated them, and took alive John a
Chamber their firebrand. As for Sir John Egremond,
he fled into Flanders to the Lady Margaret of Bur-
gundy, whose palace was the sanctuary and receptacle
of all traitors against the King. John a Chamber was
executed at York in great state ; for he was hanged
upon a gibbet raised a stage higher in the midst of a
square gallows, as a traitor paramount ; and a number
of his men that were his chief complices were hanged
upon the lower story round about him ; and the rest
were generally pardoned. Neither did the King him-
self omit his custom to be first or second in all his war-
like exploits, making good his word which was usual
with him when he heard of rebels, (that he desired but
to see them). For immediately after he had sent down
i Regi in/ensus erat.
2 Ed. 1622 has " popular." In the MS. the word seems to have been
originally written " populare ; " but the r has apparently been corrected
into c. See p. 180. where the same error has been corrected in the same
way.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 137
the Earl of Surrey, he marched towards them himself
in person. And although in his journey he heard
news of the victory, yet he went on as far as York,1
to pacify and settle those countries: and that done,
returned to London, leaving the Earl of Surrey for his
lieutenant in the northern parts, and Sir Richard Tun-
stal for his principal commissioner to levy the subsidy,
whereof he did not remit a denier.
About the same time 2 that the King lost so good a
servant as the Earl of Northumberland, he lost like-
wise a faithful friend and ally of James the Third
King of Scotland by a miserable disaster. For this3
unfortunate Prince, after a long smother of discontent
and hatred of many of his nobility and people, break-
ing forth at times into seditions and alterations of
court, was at last distressed by them, having taken
arms and surprised the person of Prince James his son
(partly by force, partly by threats that they would
otherwise deliver up the kingdom to the King of Eng-
land) to shadow their rebellion, and to be the titular
1 He " departed from Hertford towards the north" on the 22nd of May.
(Lei. iv. p. 246.) ; about two months after the forces sailed for Brittany. We
are to remember therefore that the war in Brittany was going on at the
same time with this rebellion. Bacon thought that the forces had returned
to England two or three months before, and was not aware that Henry had
any other important business on his hands at this time.
2 This is another error of date, which came from Polydore Vergil, and
was adopted by all our old chroniclers. James III. was killed on the 11th
of June, 1488, nearly seven weeks before the battle of St. Aubin; while
Henry was endeavouring to mediate between the King of France and the
Duke of Brittany, and had so far succeeded as to cause a temporary suspen-
sion of hostilities. See note 1. p. 112. It is of some importance to remem-
ber the true date ; because so great a change in Scotland, fraught with
such uncertain consequences, obliged Henry to look well to his borders
and strengthen Berwick, and materially affected the state of the question
with regard to France.
» So ed. 1622. The MS. has " the."
138 HISTOKY OF KING HENEY VII.
and painted head of those arms.1 Whereupon the
King (finding himself too weak) sought unto King
Henry, as also unto the Pope and the King of France,
to compose those troubles between him and his sub-
jects. The Kings accordingly interposed their media-
tions in a round and princely manner,2 not only by
way of request and persuasion, but also by way of prot-
estation and menace, declaring that they thought it to
be the common cause of all Kings, if subjects should
be suffered to give laws unto their sovereign ; and that
they would accordingly resent it and revenge it. But
the rebels, that had shaken off the greater yoke of
obedience, had likewise cast away the lesser tie of
respect ; and fury prevailing above fear, made answer,
that there was no talking of peace except their 3 King
would resign his crown. Whereupon (treaty of accord
taking no place) it came to a battle at Bannocksbourn
by Strivelin. In which battle the King transported
with wrath and just indignation, inconsiderately fight-
1 In this ambiguous and hardly accurate sentence there are no marks
of parenthesis either in the MS. or in the edition of 1622 ; and the MS. has
a comma after " threats " and no stop after " England: " which, if it were
right, would suggest a different meaning. But the Latin translation re-
moves the ambiguity, and shows that the punctuation which I have substi-
tuted expresses the intended construction. Siquidem arma contra eum
sumpserunt, et Jacobi Principis Jilii sui personam ex improviso intra potestatem
suam redegerunt, partim vi partim minis ; intei'minantes, se aliter regnum in
manus Regis Anglice tradituros. Eo autem consilio hoc moliebantur, ut rebel-
lionem suam obvelarent, sicque Princeps (itulare et pictum quoddam caput re-
bettionis jieret. Compare Buchanan, Rer. Scot. Hist. xii. 58.
2 Modo honorifico et qui reges magnos deceret. Tytler, who mentions
James's application to France and to Rome (vol. iv. p. 317.), says nothing
about Henry. The circumstances here detailed come from Speed (p.
735.); who quotes as his authority John Leslie, Bishop of Rosse. A letter
in the Paston correspondence, dated the 13th of May, 1488, mentions " an
ambassador from the King of Scots, who is now in great trouble about his
son and other lords of his land." Vol. v. p. 369.
8 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " the."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 139
ing and precipitating the charge before his whole num-
bers came up to him, was, notwithstanding the con-
trary express and strait commandment of the Prince
his son, slain in the pursuit, being fled to a mill situate
in the field where the battle was fought.
As for the Pope's ambassy, which was sent by
Adrian de Castello an Italian legate, (and perhaps
as those times were might have prevailed more,) it
came too late for the ambassy, but not for the am
bassador. For passing through England and being
honourably entertained and received of King Henry
(who ever applied himself with much respect to the
see of Rome), he fell into great grace with the King,
and great familiarity and friendship with Morton the
Chancellor. Insomuch as the King taking a liking
to him, and finding him to his mind,1 preferred him
to the bishoprick of Hereford, and afterwards to that
of Bath and Wells, and employed him in many of his
affairs of state that had relation to Rome. He was a
man of great learning,2 wisdom, and dexterity in busi-
ness of state ; and having not long after ascended to
the degree of cardinal, paid the King large tribute
of his gratitude in diligent and judicious advertise-
ment 3 of the occurrents of Italy. Nevertheless in the
end of his time he was partaker of the conspiracy
which cardinal Alphonso Petrucci and some other
cardinals had plotted against the life of Pope Leo.
And this offence, in itself so hainous, was yet in him
aggravated by the motive thereof; which was not
1 Et eum rebus suis utilem fore credens.
2 The Latin translation goes further and calls him a great man. Certe
vir magnusfuil Adrianus et multa eruditione, <fc. prceditus.
8 A long letter of this kind from Adrian to Henry, dated 4th June, 1504,
is still to be seen in the Cotton collection. (Cleo. iii. fo. 171.).
140 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
malice or discontent, but an aspiring mind to the
papacy.1 And in this height of impiety there wanted
not an intermixture of levity and folly, for that (as
was generally believed) he was animated to expect
the papacy by a fatal mockery ; the prediction of a
sooth-sayer ; which was, That one should succeed Pope
Leo, whose name should be Adrian, an aged man of
mean birth and of great learning and wisdom; by
which character and figure he took himself to be
described ; though it were fulfilled of Adrian the
Fleming, son to2 a Dutch brewer, cardinal of Tor-
tosa, and preceptor unto Charles the Fifth ; the same
that, not changing his christen-name, was afterwards
called Adrian the Sixth.
But these things happened in the year following,
which was the fifth of this King.3 But in the end
of the fourth year the King had called again his
Parliament,4 not as it seemeth for any particular occa-
sion of state : but the former Parliament 5 being ended
somewhat suddenly (in regard of the preparation for
Brittaine), the King thought he had not remunerated
his people sufficiently with good laws, (which ever-
1 Ambitione fceda adipiscendi papatum.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " of."
8 Henry's fifth year extended from 22nd August, 1489, to 21st August,
1490. " These things " therefore must mean the favour and preferment
of Adrian.
4 Meaning probably the session of October, 1489; and perhaps confound-
ing it with the previous session in the January preceding, of which there
is no notice in Polydore or in any of the succeeding chroniclers. That
Parliament had been prorogued on the 23rd of February, 1488-9, and met
again on the 14th of October following, — the beginning of Henry's fifth
year.
5 Meaning the Parliament which Bacon supposed to have been called in
June or July, 1488; and to which he refers the acts passed by the Parlia-
ment of November, 1487. Understand it of the session of January, '88-9,
and the words are correct enough.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 141
more was his retribution for treasure) : and finding
by the insurrection in the north, there was discon-
tentment abroad in respect of the subsidy, he thought
it good for1 to give his subjects yet further content-
menrand comfort in that kind. Certainly his times
for good commonwealths laws did excel ; so as he
may justly be celebrated for the best lawgiver to this
nation after King Edward the First. For his laws
(whoso marks them well) are deep and not vulgar ;
not made upon the spur of a particular occasion for
the present, but out of providence of the future ; to
make the estate of his people still more and more
happy, after the manner of the legislators in ancient
and heroical times.
First therefore he made a law suitable to his own
acts and times. For as himself had in his person
and marriage made a final concord in the great suit
and title for the crown ; so by this law he settled
the like peace and quiet in the2 private possessions
of the subjects : ordaining, That Fines thenceforth
should be final to conclude all strangers rights ; 3 and
that upon fines levied, and solemnly proclaimed, the
i So MS. Ed. 1622 omits " for."
2 So ed. 1622. The MS. omits " the."
8 4 H. 7. c. 24., passed in February, 1489-90. See Statutes of the Realm,
p. 524. note.
Readers that are not learned in the law may perhaps find the Latin
easier to understand than the English. Ordinatum est enim ut Fines quos
vocant {quod genus est transactions cujusdam solennis) r ever a finales essent ad
jura non partium tantum sed aliorum omnium extinguenda : ita tamen ut post
fines hujusmodi levatos, et solenniter proclamatos, haberet subditus spatium
quinque annorum post titulum suum devolutum, ad jus suum reciiperandum aut
saltern vindicandum; quod si praitermisisset^'ure suo in perpetuum excluder etur.
The Index Vocabulorum explains what a "fine" is: viz. instrumentum
quo Imreditates transferuntur, eamque habet vim ut omnium jura, si intra
tempus non agant, extinguat.
142 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
subject should have his time of watch for five years
after his title accrued ; which if he forepassed, his right
should be bound for ever after ; with some exception
nevertheless of minors, married women, and such in-
competent persons. This statute did in effect but
restore an ancient statute of the realm, which was
itself also made but in affirmance of the common law.
The alteration had been by a statute commonly called
the statute of non-claim,1 made in the time of Edward
the Third. And surely this law 2 was a kind of prog-
nostic of the good peace which since his time hath (for
the most part) continued in this kingdom until this
day. For statutes of non-claim are fit for times of
war, when men's heads are troubled, that they cannot
intend their estate ; but statutes that quiet possessions
are fittest for times of peace, to extinguish suits and
contentions ; which is one of the banes of peace.
Another statute was made of singular policy ; for
the population apparently,3 and (if it be thoroughly
considered) for the soldiery and militar forces of the
realm. Inclosures at that time began to be more fre-
quent, whereby arable land (which could not be ma-
nured4 without people and families) was turned into
1 Lex est quae, sub tempora belli, cum homines juri suo asserendo plerumque
non vacarent, lata erat, et vim illam finium destruxit ; qws tamen postea per
aliud statutum restituebatur. ( Index Vocab. )
2 i. e. this law of Henry VII. Ista lex definibus levandis.
3 i. e. manifestly tending to the increase of population. Incremenlum
populi regni manifesto .... promovens. 4 H. 7. c. 19. ; passed in Feb-
ruary, 1489-90.
4 i. e. cultivated : the word not having yet lost its general meaning. So
Adam speaks to Eve (Par. Lost, iv. 627.) of
" Alleys green
Our walk at noon, with branches overgrown,
That mock our scant manuring, and require
More hands lhan ours to lop their wanton growth. "
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 143
pasture, which was easily rid by a few herdsmen ; and
tenances for years, lives, and at will, (whereupon much
of the yeomanry lived,) were turned into demesnes.1
This bred a decay of people, and by consequence a
decay of towns, churches, tithes, and the like. The
King likewise knew full well, and in no wise forgot,
that there ensued withal upon this a decay and diminu-
tion of subsidies and taxes ; for the more gentlemen
ever the lower books of subsidies. In remedying of
this inconvenience the King's wisdom was admirable ;
and the Parliament's at that time. Inclosures they
would not forbid, for that had been to forbid the im-
provement of the patrimony of the kingdom ; 2 nor
tillage they would not compel ; for that was to strive
with nature and utility : 3 but they took a course to
take away depopulating inclosures and depopulating
pasturage,4 and yet not that by name,5 or by any impe-
rious express prohibition, but by consequence. The
ordinance was, That all houses of husbandry, that
were used with6 twenty acres of ground and upwards,
should be maintained and kept up for ever ; together
with a competent proportion of land to be used and
occupied with them, and in no wise to be severed from
them (as by another statute, made afterwards in his
successor's time, was more fully declared) : this upon
1 i. e. lands kept by the lord of the manor in his own hands. Posses-
siones qua non sunt feodales, sed in manibus domini. (Ind. Vocab.)
2 i. e. by means of a more productive cultivation. Soli culturam fruc-
tuosiorem, atque inde seculuram patrimonii regni meliorationem.
8 Cum natura ipsa et rebus pugnare.
4 i. e. such kinds of enclosures and pasturage as manifestly induced
depopulation. Clausuras tantum et pascua quaz depopulationem liquido
invehebant.
6 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " not by that name."
6 i. e. that had annexed to them. Quibus fuerint annexa.
144 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
forfeiture to be taken, not by way of popular action,
but by seizure of the land itself by the King and lords
of the fee, as to half the profits, till the houses and
lands were restored. By this means the houses being
kept up did of necessity enforce a dweller ; and the pro-
portion of land for occupation being kept up, did of
necessity enforce that dweller not to be a beggar or
cottager, but a man of some substance, that might keep
hinds and servants, and set the plough on going. This
did wonderfully concern the might and mannerhood1
of the kingdom, to have farms as it were of a standard,
sufficient to maintain an able body out of penury, and
did in effect amortise a great part of the lands of the
kingdom unto the hold and occupation of the yeomanry
or middle people, of a condition between gentlemen and
cottagers or peasants. Now how much this did ad-
vance the militar power of the kingdom, is apparent by
the true principles of war and the examples of other
kingdoms. For it hath been held by the general opin-
ion of men of best judgment in the wars (howsoever
some few have varied, and that it may receive some
distinction of case) that the principal strength of an
army consisteth in the infantry or foot. And to make
good infantry, it requireth men bred not in a servile or
indigent fashion, but in some free and plentiful manner.
Therefore if a state run most to noblemen and gentle-
men, and that the husbandmen and ploughmen be but
as their workfolks or2 labourers, or else mere cottagers
(which are but housed beggars), you may have a good
1 So both the MS. and the ed. of 1622. I do not remember to have met
with the word any where else. The translation gives — Hoc populi nu-
merum miris modis augebat, quin et potzntwe, regni milltaris intererat.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " and."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 145
cavalry, but never good stable bands of foot ; like to
coppice woods, that if you leave in them staddles too
thick, they will run to bushes and briars, and have
little clean underwood. And this is to be seen in
France and Italy (and some other parts abroad),
where in effect all is noblesse or peasantry (I speak
of people out of towns1), and no middle people ; and
therefore no good forces of foot : insomuch as they are
enforced to employ mercenary bands of Switzers (and
the like2) for their battalions of foot. Whereby also it
comes to pass that those nations have much people and
few soldiers. Whereas the King saw that contrariwise
it would follow, that England, though much less in ter-
ritory, yet should have infinitely more soldiers of their
native forces than those other nations have. Thus did
the King secretly sow Hydra's teeth ; whereupon (ac-
cording to the poets' fiction) should rise up armed men
for the service of this kingdom.
The King also (having care to make his realm potent
as well by sea as by land), for the better maintenance
of the navy, ordained, That wines and woads from the
parts of Gascoign and Languedoc, should not be brought
but in English bottoms ; 3 bowing the ancient policy of
this estate from consideration of plenty to consideration
of power : for that almost all the ancient statutes in-
vite 4 (by all means) merchants strangers 5 to bring in
all sorts of commodities ; having for end cheapness, and
not looking to the point of state concerning the naval
power.
1 " Populo in agris degentc non in urbibus."
2 " Helvetiorum aul Germanoirum.^
8 4 Hen. 1. c. 10. ; passed February, 1489-90.
4 So MS. Ed. 1622 has "incite." The translation has invitant.
5 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " merchant-strangers." See note 2. p. 100.
VOL. xi. 10
143 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
The King also made a statute in that Parliament
monitory and minatory towards justices of peace,1 that
they should duly execute their office, inviting com-
plaints against them, first to their fellow-justices, then
to the justices of assize, then to the King or Chancellor;
and that a proclamation which he had published of that
tenor should be read in open session four times a year,
to keep them awake. Meaning also to have his laws
executed,2 and thereby to reap either obedience or
forfeitures, (wherein towards his later times he did de-
cline too much to the left hand,) he did ordain remedy
against the practice that was grown in use, to stop and
damp informations upon penal laws, by procuring infor-
mations by collusion to be put in by the confederates
of the delinquents, to be faintly prosecuted and let fall
at pleasure, and pleading them in bar of the informa-
tions which were prosecuted with effect.
He made also laws for the correction of the mint,
and counterfeiting of foreign coin current.3 And that
no payment in gold should be made to any merchant
i 4 H. 7. c. 12. | passed February, 1489-90.
2 The translation varies a little from the original here; for it represents
this admonition to the justices, equally with the act for putting a stop to
collusive informations, as attributable to the same motive; viz. his desire
of forfeitures. Hoc modo fore putabat ut leges suce poenales executioni de-
mandareniur, utque inde vel obedientice vel mulctarum fructum perciperet: in
qua re versus finem vitce suce declinavit nimis in partem sinistram. Hunc ad
finem etiam cohibuit pragmaticam quandam, nuper ortam, qua informationes
verai super legibus paenalibus exhibits, informationibus aliis illusoriis suffoca-
bantur, exhibitis scilicet per quosdam quos delinquentes ipsi suborndrant, ut ad
libitum eorum fieret litis vel prosecutio vel desertio ; atque hoc modo veros
prosecutiones (scilicet ne duplex for et vexatio) regerebant.
This is the act 4 H. 7. c. 20. passed Feb. 1489-90.
3 i. e. for punishing the adulteration of foreign coin that was made cur-
rent in England. De monetaria reformanda et nummorum externorum {eorum
scilicet qui edicto regio essent in usum regni recepti) adulter atione punienda.
4 H. 7. c. 18. 23.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 147
stranger ; the better to keep treasure within the realm ;
for that gold was the metal that lay in least room.1
He made also statutes for the maintenance of drapery
and the keeping of wools within the realm ; and not
only so, but for stinting and limiting the prices of
cloth; one for the finer, and another for the coarser
sort.2 Which I note, both because it was a rare thing
to set prices by statute, especially upon our home com-
modities ; and because of the wise model 3 of this act ;
not prescribing prices,4 but stinting them not to exceed
a rate ; that the clothier might drape accordingly as
he might afford.
Divers other good statutes were made that Parlia-
ment, but these were the principal. And here I do
desire those into whose hands this work shall fall, that
they do take in good part my long insisting upon the
laws that were made in this King's reign ; whereof I
have these reasons ; both because it was the preemi-
nent virtue and merit of this King,6 to whose memory
I do honour ; and because it hath some correspondence
to my person ; but chiefly because in my judgment it
is some defect even in the best writers of history, that
they do not often enough summarily deliver and set
down the most memorable laws that passed in the
times whereof they write,6 being indeed the principal
1 And was therefore most easily smuggled out. Quod facillime et occulta
transportari posset.
2 4 H. 7. c. 8. ; passed December, 1489.
8 Prudens temper amentum.
4 i. e. not fixing the exact price of each kind of cloth ; but only the
maximum. The clothier was free to sell as cheap as he pleased. Quod
pretia preecise pannorum diversi generis non pr&scriberet, sed sanciret tan-
tum, $c.
5 Ut optimus legislator essel.
« The edition of 1622 has writ. In the MS. it seems to me that writt has
148 HISTOKY OF KING HENRY VII.
acts of peace. For though they may be had1 in
original books of law themselves ; yet that informeth
not the judgment of kings and counsellors and persons
of estate so well as to see them described and entered
in the table and portrait of the times.
About the same time the King; had a loan from the
City2 of four thousand pounds, which was double to
that they lent before, and was duly and orderly paid
back at the day, as the former likewise had been : the
King ever choosing rather to borrow too soon than to
pay too late, and so keeping up his credit.
Neither had the King yet cast off his cares and
hopes touching Brittaine,3 but thought to master the
been corrected into write, the second t being turned into e, — not struck
out, as the compositor perhaps supposed.
1 Maxima ex parte reperiri soleant.
2 According to Fabyan (a good authority on such a point) the King bor-
rowed this sum in his third year; i. e. 1487-8. And according to the old
chronicle (Cott. Vitel. A. xvi.) — which seems to deserve quite as much
credit as Fabyan, if not more, — he borrowed another sum of 2000J. in
July, 1488: in contemplation perhaps of troubles on his Scotch borders;
James III. having been killed just before.
8 In returning to the business of Brittany, it will be remembered that
we left the English forces, not returning unsuccessful (as Bacon, following
Polydore, supposed), but preparing to embark. They arrived in Brittany
in the beginning of April, 1489, and were in full operation there all the
time that the actions in Flanders which Bacon is now proceeding to relate
were going on. Had Bacon known this, he would no doubt have con-
nected the two actions together in quite a different way, and seen that the
succours to the Duchess in Brittany and to Maximilian. in Flanders were
the two parts of a simultaneous and combined movement to stop the
French King's progress. What the success of it was I will explain pres-
ently. In the meantime the following letter from Henry himself to Lord
Oxford will put the reader in possession of the true state of affairs in that
quarter at the time of which Bacon is now speaking. As it is very char-
acteristic as well as concise, I transcribe it at length, from the Paston Let-
ters, vol. v. p'. 370.
" Eight trusty and entirely beloved cousin, we greet you well. Inas-
much as it hath liked God to send us good tidings out of Bretayn, such as
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 149
occasion by policy, though his arms had been unfor-
tunate, and to bereave the French King of the fruit
we doubt not but ye be desirous to understand, we write unto you of
thenras they be comen to our knowledge and as followeth.
" The Lord Malpertuis, now lately with us in ambassade from our dear
cousin the Duchess of Bretayne, shipped at our port of Dartmouth and
arrived at St. Paul de Lyon in Bretayn on Palm' Sunday at four afternoon
[Palm Sunday in 1489 fell on the 12th of April], from whence he wrote us
the disposition and the state of the country there, and of the landing and
the demeaning of our army. We received his writing on Monday last at
evensong time. And because he was of Bretayn born and favourable to
that party, we ne gave such trust to his tidings as was thought to us surety
to write to you thereupon. This day after high mass cometh unto us out
of Bretayn foresaid, and with a new ambassade from our said cousin, Faw-
con, one of our pursuivants, that ratifieth the news of the said Lord Mal-
pertuis ; which ben these : —
" After the garrison of Frenchmen in the town of Gyngham [Guincamp]
had certainty of the landing of our army, they drew down the fabours
[portcullises or fauxbourys\ of Gyngham and made them meet to defend a
siege. But as soon as they understood that our army journeyed towards
them, they left the same Gyngham. where our said army arrived the
Thursday next before Palm Sunday, and was received with procession,
lodged and received and refreshed in the town four days. And going
towards the said Duchess they must pass to the castle and borough of
Moncouter. In that castle was also a garrison of Frenchmen, which incon-
tinently upon word that our said army drew towards them, the French-
men did cast down great part of the walls, and fled from thence. In that
castle and borough our said army kept their Easter. The castle of Chan-
son adjoining near to the town of St. Bryak [Brieu] was also garrisoned
with Frenchmen. That castle they set on fire and so fled in. The towns
of Henebone and Vannes were garrisoned with Frenchmen which brake
down the walls of the towns and put themselves to flight. The inhabi-
tants about Brest have laid siege thereunto and gotten the Base Court of
the Frenchmen or the departing of our said pursuivant. The garrison
of the town of Concarneau, which is one of the greatest strengths of
all Bretayn, was besieged in likewise and driven to that necessity that
they within offered or his departing to avoid the town with staff in hand.
How that is taken, or what more is done sithence, he cannot tell.
" Our said cousin the Duchess is in her city of Rennes; and our right
trusty Knight and Counsellor Sir Richard Edgecomb there also, having
chief rule about her. And the Marshal of Bretayne arredieth him to join
with them in all haste and with a good band of men. Many noblemen of
that country repair to our said army to take their party.
"These premises in substance we have by writing as well from the
150 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
of his victory. The sum of his design was to encour-
age Maximilian to go on with his suit for the marriage
of Anne the heir of Brittaine, and to aid him to the
consummation thereof. But the affairs of Maximilian
were at that time in great trouble and combustion, by
a rebellion of his subjects in Flanders, especially those
of Bruges and Gaunt ; whereof the town of Bruges
(at such time as Maximilian was there in person) had
suddenly armed in tumult, and slain some of his prin-
cipal officers, and taken himself prisoner, and held him
in durance till they had enforced him and some of his
counsellors to take a solemn oath to pardon all their
offences, and never to question and revenge the same
in time to come. Nevertheless Frederick the Em-
peror would not suffer this reproach and indignity
offered to his son to pass, but made sharp wars upon
Flanders to reclaim and chastise the rebels.1 But the
Lord Ravenstein 2 a principal person about Maximilian
and one that had taken the oath of abolition3 with
his master, pretending the religion thereof, but indeed
upon private ambition, and as it was thought insti-
gated and corrupted from France, forsook the Emperor
and Maximilian his lord, and made himself an head
of the popular party, and seized upon the towns of
chief captains of our said army as from our Comptroller foresaid : and that
our said army, blessed be God, hath among themself kept such love and
accord that no manner of fray or debate hath been between them sithens
the time of their departing out of this our realm.
" Given under our signet at our castle at Hertford the 22 day of April."
So far therefore the measures taken by Henry were prospering; and
bearing this in mind we may now proceed with Bacon's narrative.
1 This clause is omitted in the translation.
2 Ravelston in MS.
3 That is, the oath just mentioned, that he would pardon their offences,
&c. This oath had been taken on the 16th of May, 1488. See Sismondi.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 151
Ipre and Sluce with both the castles ; and forthwith
sent to the Lord Cordes,1 governor of Picardy under
the French King, to desire aid, and to move him
that he on the behalf of the French King would be
protector of the united towns, and by force of arms
reduce the rest. The Lord Cordes was ready to em-
brace the occasion, which was partly of his own set-
ting, and sent forthwith greater forces than it had
been possible for him to raise on the sudden if he
had not looked for such a summons before, in aid of
the Lord Ravenstein and the Flemings, with instruc-
tions to invest the towns between France and Bruges.
The French forces besieged a little town called Dix-
mue,2 where part of the Flemish forces joined with
them. While they lay at this siege, the King of
England, upon pretence of the safety of the English
pale about Calais, but in truth being loth that Max-
imilian should become contemptible and thereby be
shaken off by the states of Brittaine about his 3 mar-
riage, sent over the Lord Morley with a thousand
men unto the Lord Daubigny, then deputy of Calais,
with secret instructions to aid Maximilian and to raise
the siege of Dixmue. The Lord Daubigny (giving
it out that all was for the strengthening of the Eng-
lish marches) drew out of the garrisons of Calais,
Hammes and Guines, to the number of a thousand
men more : so that with the fresh succours that came
1 Rapin spells the name Desquerdes. The particulars which follow seem
to come from Hall, whose narrative is much fuller than Polydore's here.
He quotes the Flemish Chronicle, from which I suppose he had the addi-
tional details.
2 So spelt both in the MS. and the edition of 1622. Now called Dix-
mude.
8 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " this marriage."
152 HISTOKY OF KING HENRY VII.
under the conduct of the Lord Morley, they made
up to the number of two thousand or better. Which
forces joining with some companies of Almaynes, put
themselves into Dixmue, not perceived by the enemies ;
and passing through the town (with some reinforce-
ment from the forces that were in the town) assailed
the enemies' camp, negligently guarded as being out
of fear, where there was a bloody fight, in which the
English and their partakers obtained the victory, and
slew to the number of eight thousand men, with the
loss on the English part of a hundred or thereabouts ;
amongst whom was the Lord Morley. They took
also their great ordnance, with much rich spoils, which
they carried to Newport ; * whence the Lord Daubigny
returned to Calais, leaving the hurt men and some
other voluntaries in Newport. But the Lord Cordes
being at Ipre with a great power of men, thinking to
recover the loss and disgrace of the fight at Dixmue,
came presently on and sat down before Newport and
besieged it ; and after some days siege, he resolved to
try the fortune of an assault ; which he did one day,2
and succeeded therein so far, that he had taken the
principal tower and fort in that city, and planted upon
it the French banner ; whence nevertheless they were
presently beaten forth by the English, by the help
of some fresh succours of archers, arriving by good
fortune (at the instant) in the haven of Newport.
Whereupon the Lord Cordes, discouraged, and meas-
uring the new succours which were small by the suc-
cess which was great, left3 his siege. By this means
1 A town at the mouth of the river on which Dixmude stands.
2 This was on Midsummer's Day, 1489. See the Herald's journal. Cott.
Jul. xi. f. 55.
8 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " levied."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 153
matters grew more exasperate between the two Kings
of England and France, for that in the war of Flan-
ders the auxiliary forces of French and English were
much_ blooded one against another ; which blood ran-
kled the more, by the vain words of the Lord Cordes,
that declared himself an open enemy of the English,
beyond that that appertained to the present service ;
making it a common by-word of his, That he could
be content to lie in hell seven years so he might win
Calais from the English.
The King having thus upheld the reputation1 of
Maximilian, advised him now to press on his marriage
with Brittaine to a conclusion ; which Maximilian ac-
cordingly did ; and so far forth prevailed both with the
young lady and with the principal persons about her,
as the marriage was consummate by proxy2 with a cer-
emony at that time in these parts new. For she was
not only publicly contracted, but stated as a bride, and
solemnly bedded, and after she was laid, there came in
Maximilian's ambassador with letters of procuration,
1 Res et existimationem.
2 Polydore Vergil, from whom all this comes, does not give the date of
this proxy-marriage, and the diligence of modern French historians does
not seem to have succeeded in fixing it with certainty. It is said to have
been performed with such secrecy that even the servants of the Duchess
were not aware of it for some time. If so — and the existence of a doubt
as to the date of such an event makes it probable that secrecy was
affected, though it does not oblige us to believe with Rapin that neither
Henry nor Charles knew of it for above a twelvemonth after — the object
must have been to keep it from Charles ; and we need not seek so far as
Bacon does to account for Maximilian's being content with a marriage by
proxy: had he gone to Brittany in person, the secret would have been
harder to keep.
Lingard dates the marriage as late as April, 1491; which must be
wrong ; for there is a commission extant dated the 29th of March in that
year, in which the marriage is distinctly mentioned. See Rymer, xii. 438.
D'Argentre" (xiii. 56.) puts it about the beginning of November, 1490.
154 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
and in the presence of sundry noble personages, men
and women, put his leg (stript naked to the knee) be-
tween the espousal sheets, to the end that that cere-
mony might be thought to amount to a consummation
and actual knowledge. This done, Maximilian (whose
property was to leave things then when they were
almost comen to perfection, and to end them by imagi-
nation ; like ill archers, that draw not their arrows up
to the head ; and who might as easily have bedded the
lady himself1 as to have made a play and disguise of
it,) thinking now all assured, neglected for a time his
further proceeding, and intended his wars.2 Meanwhile
1 Besides the reasons suggested in the last note, it must be remembered
that Anne did not complete her fourteenth year till the 26th of January,
1490-1. See Daru, iii. p. 84.
2 What then became of the English forces in Brittany ? Polydore Ver-
gil did not know they were there; the old English historians, following
Polydore without suspicion, do not raise the question ; the modern, by cor-
recting Polydore's dates, raise, but do not perfectly answer it. There
they were however all this time ; and it is particularly important with ref-
erence to Henry's administration to know when and under what circum-
stances they came back. For it was the most considerable move in the
game, and was regarded by Bacon as the single exception to the good for-
tune of Henry's military enterprises; and one so little in keeping with the
rest that he is obliged to impute it to an accident, for which through want
of political foresight he had neglected to provide. French historians sup-
ply us with the true story, and show that this business was in fact no
exception, but a striking illustration both of the qualities and the fortune
which Bacon ascribes to him.
I have already explained that the expedition was planned with great
deliberation, and formed part of a combined movement, in conjunction
with Spain and Flanders, to arrest the French King's progress in the
reduction of Brittany. In pursuance of this plan Spain threatened France
in the south at Fontarabia; Maximilian, though hampered with troubles
at home, contrived with Henry's assistance to effect an important diver-
sion in the north; at the same time secretly and successfully pressing his
suit for the young Duchess's hand; and the English forces in Brittany
meanwhile, if they gained no brilliant successes over the French, yet
effectually stopped their career of conquest: the result of all which was
that Charles gave up the attempt to carry his ends that way. It has in-
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 155
the French King (consulting with his divines, and
finding that this pretended consummation was rather
deed been stated, not only by Polydore Vergil and those also who followed
him, but by modern writers with better information, that Henry not only
failed to give these forces due support and encouragement while they
were there, but recalled them in less than six months, — that is before the
stipulated time of service had expired. But this is surely a mistake, aris-
ing from some attempt to combine Bacon's narrative with the facts derived
from Rymer's Foedera and the Breton archives, instead of setting it aside
altogether, as inconsistent with them and resting itself upon no better
authority than Polydore's. The fact is that in the middle of August,
1489, which was the fifth month after their landing, Henry instead of re-
calling was reinforcing them. (See Rymer, xii. 337.; also Calendar of
Patent Rolls, where we find commissions issued on the 14th, 15th, and 16th
of August for the raising of a force " destined for Brittany; " and compare
Lobineau, i. p. 805.); and (not to attempt to trace with exactness, the
separate operations of the many causes which conspired to bring about
the total result) the end of it all was that Charles consented soon after to
make peace, on terms by no means disadvantageous to Brittany. By the
treaty of Frankfort, concluded between him and Maximilian sometime in
the autumn of 1489, it was agreed that Charles should restore to the
Duchess all the towns which he had conquered since her father's death
(except three or four which were to be held in trust by the Duke of Bour-
bon and the Prince of Orange until the differences should be amicably
settled; for which purpose a congress was to be holden at Tournay in the
following April); that he should in the meantime withdraw his troops out
of Brittany, and that she should dismiss her foreign auxiliaries. u Et vuy-
deront " (says D'Argentre) " les gens de guerre Francois de Bretagne,
comme aussi la Duchesse feroit vuyder les Anglois." This treaty was
accepted by the Duchess, according to Lobineau, in November, 1489;
whereupon the English forces would of course be withdrawn, or if they
remained it was only pending the payment of expenses.
We see therefore that there is no ground for regarding the issue of this
enterprise as a thing requiring explanation or apology. If it did not aim
to accomplish much, it is not the less characteristic of Henry on that
account. What it did aim at it accomplished; and it does not appear to
have been his fault if the winning of the move did not secure the game.
The project of marriage between Maximilian and the Duchess was so far
advanced that a commission for consummating it by proxy was issued
(D'Argentre*, xiii. 56.) on the 23rd of March, 1489 — that is, I presume,
1489-90, though it matters not to the present question to which year the
date belongs — and had it been regularly completed, which might (it
seems) have been done if Maximilian had not left it when it was all but
done, Charles would apparently have been fairly checkmated. As it was,
he was obliged to quit the attempt to possess himself of Brittany by
156 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
an invention of court than any ways valid by the laws
of the church,) went more really l to work ; and by
secret instruments and cunning agents, as well matrons
about the young lady as counsellors, first sought to re-
move the point of religion and honour out of the mind
of the lady herself ; wherein there was a double
labour ; for Maximilian was not only contracted unto
the lady, but Maximilian's daughter was likewise con-
tracted to King Charles : so as the marriage halted
upon both feet, and was not clear on either side. But
for the contract with King Charles, the exception lay
plain and fair ; for that Maximilian's daughter was
under years of consent, and so not bound by law ; but
a power of disagreement left to either part.2 But for
the contract made by Maximilian with the lady herself,
they were harder driven : having nothing to allege,
but that it was done without the consent of her sover-
eign lord King Charles, whose ward and client she
was, and he to her in place of a father ; and therefore
it was void and of no force, for want of such consent.
Which defect (they said) though it would not evac-
uate a marriage after cohabitation and actual consum-
mation, yet it was enough to make void a contract.
For as for the pretended consummation, they made
sport with it, and said that it was an argument that
Maximilian was a widower, and a cold wooer, that
could content himself to be a bridegroom by deputy,
and would not make a little journey to put all out of
question. So that the young lady wrought upon by
force, and try it another way. In all respects therefore, the enterprise
appears to have been planned with characteristic caution and concluded
with characteristic success.
i Magis solide.
2 This clause is omitted in the translation.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 157
these reasons, finely instilled by such as the French
King (who spared for no rewards or promises) had
made on his side ; and allured likewise by the present
glory and greatness of King Charles (being also a
young king and a bachelor) ; and loth to make her
country the seat of a long and miserable war ; secretly
yielded to accept of King Charles. But during this
secret treaty with the lady, the better to save it from
blasts of opposition and interruption, King Charles re-
sorting to his wonted arts, and thinking to carry the
marriage as he had carried the wars, by entertaining
the King of England in vain belief, sent a solemn
ambassage 1 by Francis Lord of Luxemburgh, Charles
1 I have not succeeded in absolutely fixing the date of this embassy.
But the circumstance which Polydore Vergil is least likely to have been
mistaken in relating, and of which the date can be fixed with the nearest
approach to certainty, appears to be this; that the ambassadors whom
Henry despatched with the answer to this embassy, met on their way, at
Calais, a legate of the Pope, who was on his way to England. And though
Polydore says that the legate came from Pope Alexander VI. who had just
succeeded Pope Innocent (in which case it must have been at least as late
as August, 1492, after Charles and Anne were married and while England
and France were at war) — yet I suppose it was more likely that he
should have made a mistake as to the date of Pope Innocent's death than
as to the circumstance of an accidental meeting at Calais between the
ambassadors and a legate from the Pope.
Taking this then as a fixed point, the date of the " solemn ambassage"
here mentioned may be set with some confidence in November or Decem-
ber, 1489. We know from the Herald's journal (Jul. xii. fo. 61. b) that
during Christmas in that year there was in England " a great ambassade
of France, that is to say Francois Mom. de Luxembourgh, Viscount of
Geneve, and the General of the order of the Trinity in France; which on
St. John's Day dined at the King's board: " — that " anon after" Candle-
mas Day (i. e. Feb. 2nd, 1489-90) "... the ambassadors of France had
soon their answer, were right greatly and largely rewarded, and well con-
duct to the sea side by the King's almoner and Sir John Rysley, Knt. : "
— that " soon after the King sent a great ambassage into France " (prob-
Iably that of which the commission bears date 27th February; see Rymer),
" that is to say, the Lord Privy Seal, Bishop of Exeter, the Earl of Or-
mond, the Queen's chamberlain, and the Prior of Christ Church of Can-
158 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Marignian, and Robert Gagvien, general of the order
of the bons-hommes of the Trinity, to treat a peace and
league with the King ; accoupling it with an article in
the nature of a request, that the French King might
with the King's good will (according unto his right of
seigniory and tutelage) dispose of the marriage of the
young Duchess of Brittaine as he should think good,
offering by a judicial proceeding to make void the mar-
riage of Maximilian by proxy. Also all this while the
better to amuse the world, he did continue in his court
and custody the daughter of Maximilian, who formerly
had been sent unto him to be bred and educated in
France, not dismissing or renvoying her,1 but con-
trariwise professing and giving out strongly that he
meant to proceed with that match; and that for the
Duchess of Brittaine, he desired only to preserve his
right of seigniory, and to give her in marriage to some
such ally as might depend upon him.
When the three commissioners came to the court
of England, they delivered their ambassage unto the
King, who remitted them to his counsel ; where some
days after they had audience, and made their propo-
sition by the Prior of the Trinity (who though he
were third in place, yet was held the best speaker of
them) to this effect : 2
terbury:" — and that "after Mid-Lent ensuing" (Mid-Lent Sunday in
1490 fell on the 21st of March) " there came to the King divers and many
ambassadors, — that is to say, a Legate from the Pope," &c. Under these
circumstances, the ambassadors on their way to Paris and the Pope's
legate on his way to England would very likely meet at Calais.
It is true, on the other hand, that there is in Rymer a safe conduct for
the three persons named by Bacon, dated the 10th of December, and en-
tered as belonging to Henry's sixth year; which would be 1490; a date
probable enough in itself.
1 So ed. 1622. The MS. omits " her."
2 Is locutus esse perhihetur in hunc modum. There is nothing in Polydore
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 159
" My lords, the King our master, the greatest and
mightiest King that reigned in France since Charles
the great whose name he beareth, hath nevertheless
thought it no disparagement to his greatness at this
time Fo propound a peace, yea and to pray a peace,
with the King of England. For which purpose he
hath sent us his commissioners, instructed and enabled
with full and ample power to treat and conclude ; giv-
ing us further in charge to open in some other business
the secrets of his own intentions. These be indeed the
precious love tokens between great Kings, to commu-
nicate one with another the true state of their affairs,
and to pass by nice points of honour, wThich ought not
to give law unto affection.1 This I do assure your
lordships ; it is not possible for you to imagine the true
and cordial love that the King our master beareth to
your sovereign, except you were near him as we are.
He useth his name with so great respect, he remem-
bereth their first acquaintance at Paris with so great
contentment, nay he never speaks of him, but that
presently he falls into discourse of the miseries of great
Kings, in that they cannot converse with their equals,
but with their2 servants. This affection to your
King's person and virtues God hath put into the heart
or Speed, nor I think in any of the English chroniclers who preceded
Bacon, from which it can be gathered that the Prior was the spokesman.
I It may indeed be reasonably conjectured from the account which Bernard
Andre gives of the matter (Cott. Domit. A. xviii. 193.) that it was so, and
several of the particulars that follow may have been taken from this
source. But there are several others which could not have been extracted
either from Polydore or Andr6, and which show that Bacon had some
soui-ce of information independent of them. How much of what follows
is derived from such a source, and how much is Bacon's own, it is im-
possible to know.
1 Quce affectui alicui insigni postponi debent.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 omits " their."
160 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
of our master, no doubt for the good of Christendom,
and for purposes yet unknown to us all ; for other root
it cannot have, since it was the same to the Earl of
Richmond that it is now to the King of England.
This is therefore the first motive that makes our King
to desire peace and league with your sovereign ; good
affection, and somewhat that he finds in his own heart.
This affection is also armed with reason of estate.
For our King doth in all candour and frankness of
dealing open himself unto you, that having an honour-
able, yea and holy1 purpose, to make a voyage and
war in remote parts, he considereth that it will be of
no small effect in point of reputation to his enter-
prise, if it be known abroad that he is in good peace
with all his neighbour princes, and specially with the
King of England, whom for good causes he esteemeth
most.
" But now my lords give me leave to use a few
words, to remove all scruples and misunderstandings
between your sovereign and ours, concerning some late
actions ; which if they be not cleared, may perhaps
hinder this peace ; to the end that for matters past
neither King may conceive unkindness of other, nor
think the other conceiveth unkindness of him. The
late actions are two ; that of Brittaine, and that of
Flanders. In both which it is true that the subjects'
swords of both Kings have encountered and stricken,
and the ways and inclinations also of the two Kings in
respect of their confederates and allies have severed.
" For that of Brittaine ; the King your sovereign
knoweth best what hath passed. It was a war of ne-
cessity on our master's part. And though the motives
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " a holy."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 161
of it were sharp and piquant as could be, yet did he
make that war rather with an olive-branch than a
laurel-branch in his hand; more desiring peace than
victory.1 Besides from time to time he sent as it were
blank papers to your King to write the conditions of
peace. For though both his honour and safety went
upon it, yet he thought neither of them too precious to
put into the King of England's hands. Neither doth
our King on the other side make any unfriendly inter-
pretation of your King's sending of succours to the
Duke of Brittaine ; for the King knoweth well that
many things must be done of Kings for satisfaction of
their people ; and it is not hard to discern what is a
King's own. But this matter of Brittaine is now by
the act of God ended and passed ; and, as the King
hopeth, like the way of a ship in the sea, without leav-
ing any impression in either of the Kings' minds ; as
he is sure for his part it hath not done in his.
" For the action of Flanders ; as the former of Brit-
taine was a war of necessity, so this was a war of jus-
tice ; which with a good King is of equal necessity
with danger of estate ; for else he should leave to be
a King. The subjects of Burgundy2 are subjects in
chief to the crown of France, and their Duke the hom-
ager and vassal of France. They had wont to be good
subjects* howsoever Maximilian hath of late distem-
pered them. They fled to the King for justice and
deliverance from oppression. Justice he could not
1 This clause is omitted in the translation.
2 Subditi Burgundiee: meaning (it would seem) the Flemings. It was
through his marriage with the heiress of Burgundy that they became
Maximilian's subjects; and it was as subjects of Burgundy that the King
of France claimed to be their lord in chief. In p. 222. the word M Flem-
ings " in the English is rendered by Buryundos in the Latin.
VOL. XI. 11
162 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
deny ; purchase 1 he did not seek. This was good for
Maximilian if he could have seen it : in people muti-
ned to arrest fury, and prevent despair. My lords, it
may be this I have said is needless, save that the King
our master is tender in any thing that may but glance
upon the friendship of England. The amity between
the two Kings no doubt stands entire and inviolate.
And that their subjects' swords have clashed, it is noth-
ing unto the public peace of the crowns ; it being a
thing very usual in auxiliary forces of the best and
straitest confederates to meet and draw blood in the
field. Nay many times there be aids of the same
nation on both sides, and yet it is not for all that a
kingdom divided in itself.
" It resteth my lords that I impart unto you a mat-
ter that I know your lordships all will much rejoice to
hear ; as that which importeth the Christian common-
weal more than any action that hath happened of long
time.2 The King our master hath a purpose and deter-
mination to make war upon the kingdom of Naples,
being now in the possession of a bastard slip of Arra-
gon ; but appertaining unto his majesty by clear and
undoubted right ; which if he should not by just arms
seek to recover, he could neither acquit his honour nor
answer it to his people. But his noble and christian
thoughts rest not here : for his resolution and hope is,3
to make the reconquest of Naples but as a bridge to
transport his forces into Grecia, and not to spare blood
or treasure (if it were to the impawning his crown and
i Meaning profit, the ordinary meaning of the word at that time. Enwl-
umentum aliquod sibi ipsi minime expetebat.
a Post nostram memoriam.
8 Spe enim hand levi non injiatur quidem sedfulcitur.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 163
dispeopling of France) till either he hath overthrown
the empire of the Ottomans, or taken it in his way to
paradise. The King knoweth well that this is a de-
sign that could not arise in the mind of any King that
did Hot steadfastly look up unto God, whose quarrel
this is, and from whom cometh both the will and the
deed. But yet it is agreeable to the person that he
beareth (though unworthy) of the Thrice Christian
King, and the eldest son of the church ; whereunto he
is also invited by the example (in more ancient time)
of King Henry the Fourth of England, (the first re-
nowned King of the House of Lancaster ; ancestor
though not progenitor * to your King ;) who had a
purpose towards the end of his time (as you know bet-
ter) to make an expedition into the Holy-land ; and by
the example also (present before his eyes) of that hon
ourable and religious war which the King of Spain
now maketh and hath almost brought to perfection, for
the recovery of the realm of Granada from the Moors.
And although this enterprise may seem vast and un-
measured, for the King to attempt that by his own
forces, wherein (heretofore) a conjunction of most of
the Christian Princes hath found work enough ; 2 yet
his Majesty wisely considereth, that sometimes smaller
forces being united under one command are more
effectual in proof (though not so promising in opinion
and fame) than much greater forces variously com-
pounded by associations and leagues, which commonly
in a short time after their beginnings turn to dissoci-
1 Ancestor seems to be used here simply in the sense of predecessor ; by
which word it is translated in the Latin. Prcedecessor quidem licet non pro-
genitor regis vestri.
2 Non sine magnis doloribus et diuturno bello olim confecerunt.
164 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
ations and divisions. But my lords that which is as a
voice from heaven that calleth the King to this enter-
prise, is a rent at this time in the house of the Otto-
mans. I do not say but there hath been brother
against brother in that house before,1 but never any
that had refuge to the arms of the Christians, as now
hath Gemes2 (brother under Bajazet that reigneth,)
the far braver man of the two ; the other being be-
tween a monk and a philosopher ; and better read in
the Alcoran and Averroes, than able wield the sceptre
of so warlike an empire. This therefore is the King
our master's memorable and heroical resolution for an
holy war. And because he carrieth in this the person
of a Christian soldier as well as of a great temporal
monarch, he beginneth with humility ; and is content
for this cause to beg peace at the hands of other Chris-
tian Kings.
" There remaineth only rather a civil request than
any essential part of our negotiation, which the King
maketh to the King your sovereign. The King (as all
the world knoweth) is lord in chief of the duchy of
Brittaine. The marriage of the heir belongeth to him
as guardian. This is a private patrimonial right, and
no business of estate. Yet nevertheless (to run a fair
course with your King, whom he desires to make an-
other himself, and to be one and the same thing with
him,) his request is, that with the King's favour and
consent he may dispose of her marriage as he thinketh
good, and make void the intruded and pretended mar-
riage of Maximilian, according to justice.
1 Quin f rater contra fratrem antehac in ilia familia arma sumpseril et de
imperio decertdrit.
2 So the ed. of 1622 and the Latin translation. The MS. has Gemmim.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 165
" This, my lords, is all that I have to say, desiring
your pardon for my weakness in the delivery."
Thus did the French ambassadors, with great1 shew
of their King's affection and many sugared words, seek
to addulce all matters between the two Kings ; having
two things for their ends ; the one to keep the King
quiet till the marriage of Brittaine was past (and this
was but a summer fruit, which they thought was
almost ripe, and would be soon gathered) : The other
was more lasting ; and that was to put him into such
a temper, as he might be no disturbance or impedi-
ment to the voyage for Italy.
The lords of the counsel were silent, and said only
that they knew the ambassadors would look for no
answer till they had reported to the King. And so
they rose from counsel.
The King could not well tell what to think of the
marriage of Brittaine. He saw plainly the ambition
of the French King was to impatronise himself of the
duchy ; but he wondered he would bring into his
house a litigious marriage, especially considering who
was his successor. But weighing one thing with an-
other, he gave Brittaine for lost ; 2 but resolved to
1 So ed. 1622. The MS. omits " great." The translation is a little
fuller : verbis suavissimis et plane mellitis regis sui propensionem in Henricum
regem reprcesentare, et aspera quceque inter reges duos lenire et dulcorare
conati sunt.
2 If this negotiation took place in the winter of 1489-90, and the French
ambassadors had their answer "anon after Candlemas Day," three months
thad not yet passed since the treaty of Frankfort; by which it had been
agreed that hostilities should cease; forces be withdrawn; and the ques-
tion at issue between France and Brittany referred to a congress at Tour-
nay, to be held in the following April. And though it is said that Charles
had not withdrawn his forces and that the preliminary preparations for the
proposed congress were not proceeding; yet I do not find that he at this
time meditated the renewal of hostilities, or that the case of Brittany was,
166 HISTOKY OF KING HENEY VII.
make his profit of this business of Brittaine, as a quar-
rel for war ; and of that of Naples, as a wrench and
outwardly at least, more desperate than in the preceding November. It
seems early, therefore, for Henry to " give it for lost." Whether Bacon
had sufficient grounds for the conclusion we cannot tell, without knowing
what information he had about these negotiations (for it is clear from the
many little particulars which he adds that he had some) besides what he
found in Polydore. It is certainly possible that, even in February, 1489-90,
Henry saw so far into Charles's design, and thought it so likely that the
Duchess would end the quarrel by marrying him, that (in that sense) he
did begin to "give Brittany for lost," and resolved not to entangle himself
further in a fruitless quarrel. And if Bacon had any positive ground for the
assertion, it is in that sense it must be understood. If however it was only
an inference from what went before and followed (which is perhaps more
likely) it must be remembered that Bacon was proceeding upon false
grounds. He was going upon the supposition that the French had had
their own way in Brittany, without any effectual check, since the battle
of St. Aubin. He knew nothing of the events of 1489, or of the treaty of
Frankfort; of which not the slightest hint is to be found in any of our old
historians. And believing (what may after all be true) that the negotia-
tion he was speaking of took place in the spring of 1491, he was endeavour-
ing to conceive the case as it would have been then. By that time Henry
might very well have perceived that there was no prospect of preserving
the independence of Brittany but by a greater war than it was worth.
And the obvious inadequacy and ineffectiveness of the measures which he
took, if that were his object, coupled with their singular efficacy and suc-
cess, if money was his object, may have suggested to Bacon this explana-
tion of his motives.
The main fact however, — viz. that Henry met this conciliatory move on
the part of Charles with some extravagant demand which induced a
breach, — is distinctly stated by Bernard Andre- (tandem inter eos decretum
est ut si tributum non solver ent helium in eos brevi strueretur ;) and may
indeed be gathered from Polydore's narrative, though he put a different
construction upon it. uAngli enim legati (he says) ut pauca tandem quw
cupiebant asseguerentur, permulta postulabant : Franci autem, ut nihil in fine
concederent, omnia repudiabant, stomachabantur, perneyabant" &c. Poly-
dore took it for a case of ordinary higgling; one party hoping to get as
much as he wanted by beginning with a demand for more, — the other
making the extravagance of the first demand a pretence for refusing all.
But this is merely a speculation — Polydore's way of accounting for what
he supposed to be Henry's disappointment. With this we need not trouble
ourselves. He seems to have been a mere scholar, without any historical
faculty except that of concise and fluent narrative ; his selection of cir-
cumstances is guided by no insight into the meaning of the thing; and the
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 167
mean for peace ; being well advertised how strongly
the King was bent upon that action. Having there-
general reflexions in which he now and then indulges are mere moral com-
monplaces. In a case like this however, the very shallowness of his inter-
pretation is an argument for accepting his evidence as to the fact; viz.
that Henry's demands were unreasonable, and that Charles refused to
entertain them. Indeed there is other evidence to show that early in 1490
Henry, whatever his motive may have been, had in fact made up his mind
to break with Charles, and was taking his measures with that view. On
the 15th of February the Duchess of Brittany engaged, among other
things, not to marry nor to make war or peace without his consent. In
the course of the summer, besides sending a new army to her assistance
(see a number of entries in an account of " payments made at the King's
receipt," between Whitsuntide and Michaelmas, 1490; Chapter House
Records, A. 3. 19. pp. 77-95., Rolls house), he had concluded treaties with
Ferdinand and Maximilian, by which each of the three powers was bound
under certain contingencies to join the others in an invasive war against
Charles. See Rymer. It appears also from the Calendar of Patent Rolls
that during all this spring and summer he was looking carefully to his
own coasts and borders, as if the war might be brought to his own doors
at any moment. On the 20th of May the Earl of Surrey was appointed
warden-general of the marches of England towards Scotland, with full
power to array and muster the men of Northumberland, and to treat with
agents of the Scotch King. On the 22nd he was directed to publish a
proclamation ordering home all the idle and vagrant Scots that had overrun
the country. On the 26th a commission of survey and array was sent to the
noblemen and gentlemen of Kent, with special injunction " to place beacons
for forewarning the people of the advent of the King's enemies." Similar
commissions were issued from time to time during June, July, and August,
to the other counties on the southern, and southern part of the eastern,
coast. On the 8th of July a writ was issued for the impressment of
twenty-four gunners for the defence of the town of Calais. Interspersed
among these are several commissions (the earliest dated May 22, the latest
July 17) in which mention is made of ships proceeding to sea " in resist-
ance of the King's enemies there congregating." One of the 20th of June
speaks of " the present voyage to Brittany:' And on the 17th of September
following, public proclamation was directed to be made in all the counties
of England of the confederation above mentioned between the King of
England, the King of the Romans, and the King and Queen of Spain, " to
make actual war against Charles the French King, if he invade them or
the Duchess of Brittany."
It is possible however that the precautions taken for the security of the
English coasts had reference to Perkin Warbeck, who was now beginning
to stir, rather than to any apprehension of a French invasion.
168 HISTORY OF KING HENEY VII.
fore conferred divers times with liis counsel, and keep-
ing himself somewhat close, he gave a direction to the
Chancellor for a formal answer to the ambassadors ;
and that he did in the presence of his counsel. And
after, calling the Chancellor to him apart, bad him
speak in such language as was fit for a treaty that was
to end in a breach ; and gave him also a special caveat,
that he should not use any words to discourage the
voyage of Italy. Soon after the ambassadors were
sent for to the counsel, and the Lord Chancellor
spake to them in this sort : 1
uMy lords ambassadors, I shall make answer by
the King's commandment unto the eloquent declara-
tion of you my lord Prior, in a brief and plain man-
ner. The King forgetteth not his former love and
acquaintance with the King your master. But of
this there needeth no repetition ; for if it be between
them as it was, it is well ; if there be any alteration,
it is not words will2 make it up. For the business
of Brittaine, the King findeth it a little strange that
the French King maketh mention of it as matter of
well deserving at his hand. For that deserving was
no more but to make him his instrument to surprise
one of his best confederates. And for the marriage,
the King would not meddle in it, if your master
would marry by the book,3 and not by the sword.
For that of Flanders, if the subjects of Burgundy
had appealed to your King as their chief lord, at
1 In hunc modum loculus fertur.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " that will."
8 Lituryid. This must not be understood as referring to the French
King's intention to marry the Duchess himself, for that was not yet
in question; but to the right which he claimed of disposing of her in
marriage.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 169
first,1 by way of supplication, it might have had a
shew of justice. But it was a new form of process,
for subjects to imprison their prince first, and to slay
his officers, and then to be complainants. The King
saith^that sure he is, when the French King and
himself sent to the subjects of Scotland (that had
taken arms- against their King,) they both spake in
another stile, and did in princely manner signify their
detestation of popular attentates upon the person or
authority Princes. But, my lords ambassadors, the
King leaveth these two actions thus. That on the
one side he hath not received any manner of satis-
faction from you concerning them ; and on the other,
that he doth not apprehend them so deeply, as in
respect of them to refuse to treat of peace, if other
things may go hand in hand. As for the war of
Naples and the design against the Turk ; the King
hath commanded me expressly to say, that he doth
wisli with all his heart to his good brother the French
King, that his fortunes may succeed according to his
hopes and honourable intentions : and whensoever he
shall hear that he is prepared for Grecia, — as your
master is pleased now to say that he beggeth a peace
of the King, so the King then will beg of him a part
in that war. But now, my lords ambassadors, I am
to propound unto you somewhat on the King's part.
The King your master hath taught our King what to
say and demand. You say (my lord Prior) that your
King is resolved to recover his right to Naples, wrong-
fully detained from him ; and that if he should not thus
do, he could not acquit his honour, nor answer it to his
i. e. had begun by appealing, &c. Si Burgundies, subditi a principle) per
viam supplicationis vestrum regent appellassent ut dominum supremum.
170 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
people. Think my lords that the King our master
saith the same thing over again to you, touching Nor-
mandy, Guienne, Anjou ; yea and the kingdom of
France itself. I cannot express it better than in your
own words. If therefore the French King shall con-
sent that the King our master's title to France (or
least tribute for the same) be handled in the treaty,
the King is content to go on with the rest, otherwise
he refuseth to treat."
The ambassadors being somewhat abashed with this
demand, answered in some heat, that they doubted not
but that the King their sovereign's sword would be
able to maintain his sceptre ; and they assured them-
selves he neither could nor would yield to any dimi-
nution of the crown of France, either in territory or
regality. But howsoever, they were too great matters
for them to speak of, having no commission. It was
replied that the King looked for no other answer
from them, but would forthwith send his own am-
bassadors to the French King. There was a ques-
tion also asked at the table : 1 Whether the French
King would agree to have the disposing of the mar-
riage of Brittaine, with an exception and exclusion
that he should not marry her himself? To which the
ambassadors answered, that it was so far out of their
King's thoughts as they had received no instructions
touching the same. Thus were the ambassadors dis-
missed, all save the Prior; and were followed imme-
diately by Thomas Earl of Ormond, and Thomas
Goldenston Prior of Christ-Church in Canterbury,
who were presently sent over into France. In the
1 Injecta aulem tanquam obiter est queslio a quibusdam ex consiliariis.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 171
mean space Lionel Bishop of Concordia was sent as
nuncio from Pope Alexander the Sixth 1 to both
Kings, to move a peace between them. For Pope
Alexander, finding himself pent and locked up by a
league and association of the principal states of Italy,
that he could not make his way for the advancement
of his own house (which he immoderately thirsted
after), was desirous to trouble the waters in Italy,
that he might fish the better; casting the net not
out of St. Peter's, but out of Borgia's bark. And
doubting lest the fears from England might stay the
French King's voyage into Italy, dispatched this
bishop to compose all matters between the two Kings,
if he could: who first repaired to the French King,
and finding him well inclined (as he conceived), took
On his journey towards England, and found the Eng-
lish ambassadors at Calais on their way towards the
French King. After some conference with them, he
was in honourable manner transported over into Eng-
land, where he had audience of the King. But not-
withstanding he had a good ominous name to have
made a peace, nothing followed. For in the mean
1 So Polydore ; who adds, " qui Innocentio paullo ante moiHuo succes-
serat." But Pope Innocent died on the 25th of July, 1492. Pope Alex-
ander was elected on the 11th, and crowned on the 26th, of the following
month. Now Charles VIII. had been married to the Duchess of Brittany
in the preceding December; and on the 9th of September immediately
following, Henry was on his way to France at the head of an invading
ai-my. Therefore if any legate from Pope Alexander met at Calais any
ambassadors from Henry VII., it must have been those who were ar-
ranging the treaty of Estaples, and not those who are spoken of here.
But there can be little doubt that the mistake is only as to the Pope, and
that some such conference did take place between the legate from Pope
Innocent, who arrived in England soon after Mid-Lent in 1490, and the
ambassadors who were on their way from London to Paris in the begin-
ning of March. See note 1. p. 157.
172 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
time the purpose of the French King to many the
Duchess could be no longer dissembled. Wherefore
the English ambassadors (finding how things went)
took their leave and returned. And the Prior also
was warned from hence, to depart out of England.
Who when he turned his back, (more like a pedant
than an ambassador) dispersed a bitter libel in Latin
verse ! against the King ; unto which the King (though
he had nothing of a pedant) yet was content to cause
an answer to be made in like verse ; and that as speak-
ing in his own person ; but in a stile of scorn and
sport.2
About this time also was born the King's second
son Henry,3 who afterwards reigned. And soon after
followed the solemnisation of the marriage between
Charles and Anne Duchess of Brittaine,4 with whom
he received the duchy of Brittaine as her dowry ;
the daughter of Maximilian being a little before sent
i Bernard Andrd (who seems to be the authority for this) quotes only
the first line of Gaguin's poem. Several pens seem to have flown into the
ink to answer him; and if the report of the answerers may be trusted, his
discomfiture was complete.
There is in the British Museum a little book (Disceptatio R. Gaguin et J.
Phiniphelingi super roptu Ducissce Briiannicce, 4to. 1492) containing a war
of the same kind in verse and prose between the same Prior and one of
Maximilian's chief counsellors, relating to the next stage in this same
transaction, — the French King's marriage to Maximilian's bride. One
of them, I forget which, commences the war with a Sapphic ode,
clenched with a page or two of invective in Latin prose. The other
answers in the same form and strain. Both write vigorously, and seem
quite in earnest.
2 Magno tamen cum vilipendio Prioris, cujus genio et petulantia tanquam
facetiis scurrce se oblectabat.
8 He was born (according to Stowe) on the 22nd of June, 1491: which
shows that Bacon supposed these negotiations to have taken place in the
spring of that year; not the spring of 1490, which is the true date.
4 They were married at the castle of Langeais, in Touraine, on the 6th
of December, 1491. Daru, vol. iii. p. 175.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 173
home. Which when it came to the ears of Maxi-
milian (who would never believe it till it was done,
being ever the principal in deceiving himself; though
in this the French King did very handsomely second
it) and tumbling it over and over in his thoughts,
that he should at one blow (with such a double scorn)
be defeated both of the marriage of his daughter and
his own (upon both which he had fixed high imagina-
tions), he lost all patience ; and casting off the re-
spects fit to be continued between great Kings (even
when their blood is hottest and most risen), fell to
bitter invectives against the person and actions of the
French King ; and (by how much he was the less
able to do, talking so much the more) spake all the
injuries he could devise of Charles ; saying that he
was the most perfidious man upon the earth ; and
that he had made a marriage compounded between
an advoultry and a rape ; which was done (he said)
by the just judgment of God to the end that (the
nullity thereof being so apparent to all the world)
the race of so unworthy a person might not reign in
France. And forthwith he sent ambassadors1 as well
1 The correction of one material date generally makes it necessary to
readjust all the rest. Bacon, supposing that Henry's final breach with
France was not till the spring or summer of 1491, and that the marriage
of Charles and Anne followed soon after, took this embassy of Maximilian's
for the next act; following immediately upon the marriage. But when
we find that between the breach and the marriage there was an interval
I of at least a year and a half, the question arises what were Henry and
Maximilian doing all that time? or how came they to let Charles pursue
his designs upon the Duchess so long unmolested? Upon closer examina-
tion, with the help of Rymer and other modern lights, it will appear I
think that the story requires a good deal of correction. And Polydore
Vergil's narrative supplies — not indeed the true story — but a hint
from which the true story may be collected. He says that Maximilian,
when his daughter (who was betrothed to Charles) was sent back to him,
174 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
to the King of England as to the King of Spain, to
incite them to war and to treat a league offensive
began to suspect Charles's design upon the Duchess; — that thereupon
he sent one James Contibald to Henry, to propose that they should join
their forces against Charles; himself engaging to contribute not less than
10,000 men for two years, and as soon as he should be ready for the war
to let Henry know, giving him six months for preparation: — that Henry,
who felt that the case of Brittany would not bear any longer delay, and
who was already of his own motion raising forces for her defence, was
delighted with this message, and promised that Maximilian should not
find him unprepared: — that in the mean time (that is, as I understand
it, while the arrangement between Henry and Maximilian stood thus),
Charles married Anne and so carried off Duchy and Duchess together: —
that Maximilian, as soon as the first burst of his rage was over, conclud-
ing that something must be done for the reparation of his honour, warned
Henry to prepare for war with France with all speed, for he should soon
be ready: — that Henry, in reliance upon this promise, immediately levied
a great army and sent word that he was ready and would put to sea as
soon as he heard that Maximilian was ready too: — that his messengers
found Maximilian totally unprepared: — that their report to that effect,
being quite unexpected, threw him into great perplexity, for he feared
that the war would be too much for him if he undertook it alone, and that
the people would reproach and calumniate him if he declined it: — but
that weighing the honour against the danger, he resolved for honour;
made up his mind to attack France single-handed ; raised fresh forces, and
keeping Maximilian's defection a secret from his troops lest it should dis-
pirit them, set out for Calais (for at last we come to a date) VIII. Iduum
Septembris, — the 6th of September.
Now since there is no hint here of any concurrent embassy to Spain, we
may very well suppose that Contibald's business was not the negotiation
of that triple league between Maximilian, Henry, and Ferdinand, which
held so important a place in Henry's policy; but some separate arrange-
ment in which Maximilian and Henry were concerned alone. And since
it is represented as occurring certainly before the marriage, and may for
anything that is said to the contrary have occurred a good while before, —
if we find traces of any such arrangement at any time within the preced-
ing half year, and the circumstances seem otherwise to suit, we need not
reject it on account of the date. Now such a separate arrangement was
(it seems) concluded between Henry and Maximilian about the end of
May, 1491; and this I suspect was really the business of the mission
which Polydore speaks of; though Polydore, mistaking the date, con-
nected and confounded it with other matters of like nature that happened
after.
The arrangement to which I allude (my information comes chiefly from
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 175
against France, promising to concur with great forces
of his own. Hereupon the King of England (going
Lobineau, i. p. 813, 4, who seems to have studied D'Argentre' carefully)
appear* to have been no part of the great convention between Maximilian,
Henry, and Ferdinand, for a joint invasion of France; which was in force
indeed at the time, but did not provide for such speedy action as the pres-
ent accident seemed to require. That convention had been concluded in
September, 1490; a date considerably earlier than Bacon would have as-
signed, but agreeing perfectly well with his theory of Henry's policy; for
it would seem from that that Henry had taken care, before he finally broke
with France, to provide himself with those occasions, first for making the
show of war and then for accepting terms of peace, which Bacon detected
in the broad outlines of the case, through all Polydore's errors of detail.
Already it seems he bad engaged Maximilian and Ferdinand to take their
part in a combined movement against Charles ; which if they performed,
he would have power to command what terms of peace he pleased ; if not,
he would have a fair excuse for accepting such terms as he could get.
The seed thus timely sown came prosperously to harvest at last in the
treaty of Estaples, as we shall see; but that was not till the end of 1492.
Charles in the mean time, unwilling to provoke a combined attack from
so formidable a confederacy, forbore to renew his suspended hostilities
against Brittany, and applied himself entirely to win the Duchess by
peaceful arts from her engagement to Maximilian. The Duchess however,
encouraged no doubt by these great alliances, stood well out against his
suit; and at length (by way perhaps of ending it at once) assumed pub-
licly the title of Queen of the Romans. This was in March, 1490-1, at
which time D'Argentre (xiii. 57.) supposes Charles to have just discov-
ered the marriage. So decisive a step stirred him to take stronger meas-
ures, and at the same time gave him an ally in D'Albret, an old aspirant
to the Duchess's hand whose hopes it extinguished. By this man's means
he made himself master of the important town of Nantes ; a town which
in the beginning of the war, it will be remembered, he had attempted in
vain to take; which in the summer of 1490 he had again (it would seem)
invested (see Rymer, 12 June, 1490); and which was now on the 19th of
February, 1490-1, delivered into the hands of the French. Charles him-
;lf entered it on the ±th of April, 1491. Upon the news of this, Maximil-
m, alarmed and roused in his turn, got his father the Emperor to call a
Diet (une Diette des Estates d'Allemagne), who voted him a force of
12,000 lanzknechts. They were to be sent to the succour of the Duchess
August, and to be joined by 6000 English. This I take to have been the
xasion and business of the mission of which Polydore speaks. And
jince it is certain that ambassadors were despatched from Brittany on the
kh of May, 1491, as from the King and Queen of the Romans, to solicit
succour from Henry; and that James Contibald (or Gondebault) was in
176 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
nevertheless his own way) called a Parliament, it be-
ing the seventh year of his reign ; * and the first day
England about the same time negotiating on the part of Maximilian con-
cerning the repayment of expences incurred in the affairs of Brittany;
that would seem to be the most probable date of it: a date of some conse-
quence in connexion with Henry's next proceeding; concerning which I
have a doubt to raise and settle.
The arrangement, whatever it was, was ineffectual. It is said that some
succours were sent from England (forces were certainly raised there in
April and May, 1491; see Cal. Pat. Rolls, pp. 37. 63. 71. 70.), but not
enough to do any good by themselves; that for Maximilian's lanzknechts,
Charles strengthened his frontiers against their passage and kept them
from joining, while he proceeded to take Guincamp; and that the Duch-
ess, seeing her towns going and no succour coming, and that whether
she made her appeal against Charles to arms or to arbitration, he was ob-
viously in a conditiou to defeat her either way, — at length despaired of
resistance, and consented to compound the quarrel by becoming Queen of
France and merging her duchy in her crown.
l The only Parliament that was held in Henry's seventh year met on
the 17th October, 1491. It could not therefore have been called in conse-
quence of the marriage, which had not yet taken place. This however,
considering the doubt and confusion in which all the events and dates of
these transactions are involved, would be of no great consequence. The
intentions of the French King to possess himself of Brittany by one means
or another must have been sufficiently known before October, and would
be ground enough for calling a war-parliament.
But there is another difficulty which is not so easily explained. Nothing
can be more distinct and positive than Polydore Vergil's statement that
the exaction of the benevolence was subsequent to the meeting of this
assembly, and in fact sanctioned by it. " Convocato principum concilio,
primum exponit causas belli sumendi contra Francos; deinde eos poscit
pro bello pecuniam. Causas belli cuncti generatim probant, suamque ope-
rant pro se quisque offert. Rex, collaudata suorum virtute, ut populus tri-
bute non gravaretur, cui gratificandum existimabat, voluit molliter ac
leniter pecuniam a locupletioribus per benevolentiam exigere. Fuit id ex-
actionis genus," &c. Of which the corresponding passage in Stowe may
serve for a translation. He " called a Parliament, and therein declared
that he was justly provoked to make war against the Frenchmen, and
therefore desired them of their benevolence of money and men towards the
maintenance thereof. Every man allowed the cause to be just, and prom-
ised his helping hand. And to the intent he might spare the poorer sort he
thought good first to exact money of the richest sort by way of a benevolence,
which kind of levying of money was first practised," &c. Nothing on
the other hand can be more certain than that the commissions for the
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 177
of opening thereof (sitting under his cloth of estate)
spake himself unto his Lords and Commons in this
manner.
benevolence were issued more than three months before the Parliament
met; and that the supplies which were voted by the Parliament when it
did meet were not in the form of a benevolence, but an ordinary tax of
two fifteenths and tenths. We have here therefore a substantial inaccu-
racy of some kind, which cannot be set right by shifting a date or cor-
recting a careless expression. The revival of this exaction was an
Important matter. Polydore's next words show that he knew what it
meant; and he could not have overlooked the importance of the question
whether it was done before or after a Parliament, — with or without a
Parliamentary sanction.
I am persuaded that the error lies deeper; that, as the case was nearly
the >ame as that of 1488, so the error is exactly the same as that which I
have pointed out in note 3, p. 114. I am persuaded that Polydore, on this
as on that occasion, mistook a Great Council for a Parliament; that Henry,
on this occasion as on that, before he called a regular Parliament took the
precaution of calling one of these quasi-parliaments; with a view partly
to ascertain the sense of the people and partly to engage them in the cause
before he engaged himself: and that it was to a Great Council held in
June, 1491, or thereabouts, that he now declared his intention to invade
France, at the same time asking their advice as to the raising of supplies.
For the grounds of this conclusion and for an answer to objections, I
must again refer to the appendix. If I am right, the fact and the date will
be found to be of some value, both as clearing the narrative and as illus-
trating Henry's character and policy. It will be seen that when the
French King took possession of Nantes and was obviously proceeding to
absorb Brittany either by arms or by marriage or by arbitration; and
when Maximilian was about to raise a force of 12,000 men to oppose him,
and called upon Henry to join; which was as I suppose in April or May,
1491 ; Henry had a good case to go to his people with. Having first there-
fore spread an alarm of French invasion (Cal. Pat. Rolls, 5 May, p. 71.),
and made some stir of warlike preparation to warm the blood and feel
the pulse of the people, he proceeded in the same course which had suc-
ceeded so well in 1488; and immediately summoned —not his Parliament,
which could not perhaps have been assembled so expeditiously as the time
required — but a Great Council, which he could make as fair a represent-
ative of a Parliament as he pleased, and which, though it had no power to
make laws or impose taxes, yet served very well both to express and react
upon the public opinion of the time. Finding them in an apt humour,
and having all his precautions ready taken, he boldly announced his inten-
tion of making an invasive war upon France, and thereupon (pretending
probably the urgency of the occasion, which could not wait for the ordi-
VOL. xi. 12
178 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
" My Lords and you the Commons ; when I pur-
posed to make a war in Brittaine by my lieutenant, I
nary course,) obtained their advice and consent (which though it carried
no legal authority would in a popular cause carry authority enough for
the purpose) to send out commissioners to levy a " benevolence." A com-
mission il de subsidio requirendo pro viagio Franciae " was accordingly
issued (7th July, 1491); by which, after a preamble declaring the grounds
of the intended war, which it represents as undertaken, not " de advisa-
mento concilii nostri," but "ad instantiam et specialem requisitionem
tam dominorum spiritualium et temporalium quam aliorum rcofo'ftwm," the
requisite authority was conveyed to a number of persons, each to act
within a specified county. But as these Great Councils could only give
advice and such authority as the opinion and personal influence of the
members carried with it, Henry seems to have used them only as prepara-
tory to regular Parliaments. A regular Parliament was accordingly sum-
moned shortly after, which (in consideration probably of the succours to
Brittany, upon which the benevolence money must have been partly con-
sumed, and also of its more distressed state and more imminent danger),
voted fresh supplies, but to be raised by ordinary taxation ; and passed
the laws which were convenient for a state of war.
If we suppose therefore the speech which follows to have been addressed
to a Great Council in June, 1491 ; the benevolence to have been levied,
with their advice, in July and August; some succours to have been sent
to Brittany about the same time ; and the Parliament to have met on the
17th of October; we shall have supplied all the correction which (so far
as I know) Bacon's narrative requires; and we shall find that his interpre-
tation of Henry's views and policy and character is illustrated and con-
firmed by the change.
It may be worth mentioning, as a confirmation of this conjecture, that
whereas Bacon expressly represents the King as making the declaration in
person, it does not appear from the Parliament Rolls that he did open in
person the session of October, 1491. Bacon is not likely, I think, to have
stated it so expressly, if it were only an inference from Polydore's expres-
sion "exponit causas," &c. It is more likely that he had some fuller
account of the speech itself. And it need not be thought that the same
account would have enabled him to correct the error. It may on the con-
trary have authorised and established it. Of such a declaration as this
there would no doubt at the time be many copies or abstracts circulated.
At the time, " His Majesty's Speech" would be description quite sufficient.
One of these happened perhaps to be preserved. A collector coming into
possession of it, and wanting to know in what department of his collection
it should be put, fixed the year at once from the circumstances. It was
plainly a declaration of war with France, about the time when Brittany
was absorbed into the French monarchy. Then he turned to his Poly-
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 179
made declaration thereof to you by my Chancellor.
But now that I mean to make a war upon France in
person, I will declare it to you myself. That war
was to defend another man's right, but this is to re-
cover^ our own ; and that ended by accident, but we
hope this shall end in victory.
" The French King troubles the Christian world.
That which he hath is not his own, and yet he seeketh
more. He hath invested himself of Brittaine.1 He
maintaineth the rebels in Flanders : and he threateneth
Italy. For ourselves, he hath proceeded from dissimu-
lation to neglect, and from neglect to contumely. He
hath assailed our confederates : he denieth our tribute :
in a word, he seeks war. So did not his father ; but
sought peace at our hands ; and so perhaps will he,
when good counsel .or time shall make him see as
much as his father did.
" Meanwhile, let us make his ambition our advan-
tage, and let us not stand upon a few crowns of tribute
or acknowledgement, but by the favour of Almighty
God try our right for the crown of France itself;
remembering that there hath been a French King
prisoner in England, and a King of England crowned
in France. Our confederates are not diminished.
Burgundy is in a mightier hand than ever, and never
more provoked. Brittaine cannot help us, but it
may hurt them. New acquests are more burden
than strength. The malcontents of his own king-
dore, or Hall, or Holinshed, or Stowe, found this passage, and wrote on the
back *' The Speech of K. Henry 7, at the opening of the Parliament in
1491 ; " which would seem to be authority sufficient for stating that Henry
opened the session in person.
1 So Ed. 1622. The MS. has " he hath invested Brittaine."
180 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
dom have not been base populace1 nor titulary im-
postors ; but of an higher nature. The King of
Spain (doubt ye not) will join with us, not knowing
where the French King's ambition will stay. Our
holy father (the Pope) likes no Tramontanes in Italy.
But howsoever it be, this matter of confederates is
rather to be thought on than reckoned on ; for God
forbid but England should be able to get reason of
France without a second.
" At the battles of Cressy, Poictiers, Agent-Court,
we were of ourselves. France hath much people, and
few soldiers : they have no stable bands of foot. Some
good horse they have, but those are forces which are
least fit for a defensive war, where the actions are in
the assailant's choice. It was our discords only that
lost France ; and (by the power of God) it is the
good peace which we now enjoy that will recover it.
God hath hitherto blessed my sword. I have in this
time that I have reigned, weeded out my bad subjects,
and tried my good. My people and I know one an-
other ; which breeds confidence. And if there should
be any bad blood left in the kingdom, an honourable
foreign war will vent it or purify it. In this great
business let me have your advice and aid. If any of
you were to make his son knight, you might have aid
of your tenants by law. This concerns the knight-
hood and spurs of the kingdom, whereof I am father ;
and bound not only to seek to maintain it, but to
advance it. But for matter of treasure let it not be
taken from the poorest sort, but from those to whom
1 The Ed. of 1622 has "base, popular." In the MS. it seems to
have been first written " populare," but the r has plainly been correct-
ed into a c.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 181
the benefit of the war may redound. France is no
wilderness, and I that profess good husbandry hope
to make the war (after the beginnings) to pay itself.
Go together in God's name, and lose no time, for I
have^called this Parliament wholly for this cause."
Thus spake the King. But for all this, though he
shewed great forwardness for a war, not only to his
Parliament and court, but to his privy counsel likewise
(except the two bishops and a few more), yet never-
theless in his secret intentions he had no purpose to go
through with any war upon France. But the truth
was, that he did but traffic with that war, to make his
return in money. He knew well that France was now
entire and at unity with itself, and never so mighty
many years before. He saw by the taste he 2 had of
his forces sent into Brittaine that the French knew
well enough how to make war with the English ; by
not putting things to the hazard of a battle, but weary-r-
ing 2 them by long sieges of towns, and strong fortified
en campings. James the Third of Scotland, his true
friend and confederate, gone ; and James the Fourth
(that had succeeded) wholly at the devotion of France,
and ill-affected towards him. As for the conjunctions
of Ferdinando of Spain and Maximilian, he could
make no foundation upon them. For the one had
power and not will ; and the other had will and not
power. Besides that Ferdinando had but newly taken
breath from the war with the Moors ; and merchanded
at this time with France for the restoring of the coun-
ties of Russignon and Perpignian, oppignorated to the
French. Neither was he out of fear of the discontents
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " that he."
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has M wearing."
182 HISTORY OF ZING HENRY VII.
and ill blood within the realm ; which having used
always to repress and appease in person, he was loth
they should find him at a distance beyond sea, and
engaged in war. Finding therefore the inconven-
iencies and difficulties in the prosecution of a war, he
cast with himself how to compass two things. The
one, how by the declaration and inchoation of a war
to make his profit. The other, how to come off from
the war with saving of his honour. For profit, it was
to be made two ways ; upon his subjects for the war,
and upon his enemies for the peace ; like a good mer-
chant that maketh his gain both upon the commodities
exported and imported back again. For the point of
honour, wherein he might suffer for giving over the
war, he considered well, that as he could not trust
upon the aids of Ferdinando and Maximilian for sup-
ports of war, so the impuissance of the one, and the
double proceeding of the other, lay fair for him for
occasions1 to accept of peace.
These things he did wisely foresee, and did as artifi-
cially conduct", whereby all things fell into his lap as
he desired.
For as for the Parliament, it presently took fire,
being affectionate (of old) to the war of France, and
desirous (afresh) to repair the dishonour they thought
the King sustained by the loss of Brittaine. There-
fore they advised the King (with great alacrity) to
undertake the war of France. And although the
Parliament consisted of the first and second nobility
(together with principal citizens and townsmen),2 yet
1 i. e. pretexts. Semper prcesto habiturus esset adpacem excusandam.
2 With reference to the question whether this was a Parliament or a
Great Council, it may be worth while to compare with this description
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 183
worthily and justly respecting more the people (whose
deputies they were) than their own private persons ;
and finding, by the Lord Chancellor's speech,1 the
King's inclination that way ; they consented that
commissioners should go forth for the gathering and
levying of a Benevolence from the more able sort.
This tax (called a Benevolence) was devised by Ed-
ward the Fourth, for which he sustained much envy.
It was abolished by Richard the Third by act of Par-
liament, to ingratiate himself with the people ; and it
was now revived by the King ; but with consent of
Parliament ; 2 for so it was not in the time of King
Edward the Fourth. But by this way he raised ex-
of it two independent descriptions of what was certainly a Great Coun-
cil, in the year 1496. "In this yere (says an old city chronicler, Cott.
Vitell. A. xvi. p. 161.) the 24th day of Octobre beganne a great coun-
saill holden at Westmynster by the Kyng and his lords spiritual and
temporal, to the which counsaill come certeyn burgesses and merchants
of all cities and good townes of England," &c. And in an original privy
seal of Hen. VII. (Cott. Tit. B. v. p. 145.), the same council is described
as "orgrete counseill of lords spriiell and tempell, of juges, sjaunts in
o lawe and others soni hede-wisemen of evy citie and good towne of this
or lond." Bacon's description therefore applies to either.
1 This seems to be a slip of the memory; for though it was usual for
the Lord Chancellor to speak after the King, the allusion is apparently to
the last part of the King's own speech. The Latin translation has Quin cl
regis moniti memoirs, in hoc consenserunt, ut contributio (qutim benevolentiam
appellabant) ab opulentioribus tantum exigeretur.
2 Hume observed (on a comparison of dates) that this was a mistake. I
have already explained at length my own opinion as to the nature of the
mistake and how it arose. If that explanation should be rejected, it may
be accounted for another way. The commissions for the levying of the
benevolence, though the great body of them bear date the 7th July, 1491,
did not all bear that date. There is a commission given in Rymer, dated
6th December, 1491, which is in the same words precisely. Any one who
had happened to meet with the last and not with any others would have
set it down as fixing the date of the levy of the benevolence beyond all
question. It may be observed that this benevolence received a kind of
sanction from a subsequent Parliament; an act being passed in 1495 to
enforce the payment of sums which had been promised. See p. 241.
184 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
ceeding great sums. Insomuch as the city of London
(in those days) * contributed nine thousand pounds
and better ; and that, chiefly levied upon the wealthier
sort. There is a tradition of a dilemma that Bishop
Morton (the Chancellor) used, to raise up the Benev-
olence to higher rates ; and some called it his fork,
and some his crotch. For he had couched an article
in the instructions to the commissioners who were to
levy the Benevolence, That if they met with any that
were sparing, they should tell them that they must
needs have, because they laid up ; and if they were
spenders, they must needs have, because it was seen
in their port and manner of living ; so neither kind
came amiss.
This Parliament was merely a Parliament of war ;
for it was in substance but a declaration of war
against France and Scotland, 2 with some statutes con-
1 i. e. even in those days; when money was so much scarcer. Eiiam
ilia cetate.
a The declsiration of war against Scotland, of which no mention is
made in our modern histories, is contained in the preamble to the act
(7 H. 7. c. 6.), by which all Scots, not made denizens, were ordered out
of the kingdom within forty days. " The King," it says, " our Sovereign
Lord, hath had to his great cost and charge many assemblies and com-
munications with the King of Scots for amity truce and peace to be had
and observed betwixt his Highness and his subjects on the one part, and
the King of Scots and his subjects on the other part; but what accord
or agreement soever be taken or concluded, such accord or agreement
on the part of the said King of Scots is ever under the surest promise
broken and not kept ; for the which it is better to be with them at open
war than under such a feigned peace: wherefore," &c.
I suppose the measure may be regarded as one partly of precaution
and partly of menace; the object being to induce the Scotch King to
renew the truce, which for some reason or other he seems to huve been
reluctant to do. The truce between England and Scotland which had
been confirmed at Westminster on the 24th of October, 1488 (See Rot.
Scot. ii. p. 488.), expired on the 5th of October, 1491. For some time
before, the two kings had been on terms of mutual distrust and secret
hostility. Henry had been secretly encouraging some of James's disaf-
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 185
ducing thereunto ; as the severe punishing of mort-
pays and keeping back soldiers' wages in captains ;
the like severity for the departure of soldiers without
licence ; strengthening of the common law in favour
of protections for those that were in the King's ser-
vice ; ! and the setting the gate open and wide, for
men to sell or mortgage their lands without fines for
alienation,2 to furnish themselves with money for the
fee ted subjects in a design to possess themselves of his person and de-
liver it into his hands ; — a design however which was probably not to
be executed till after the expiration of the truce upon failure of the ne-
gotiations for renewing it. James had been secretly negotiating with
the Duchess of Burgundy and Perkin Warbeck, and is supposed (see
Tytler, iv. p. 361.) to have made up his mind to break with England
as soon as he durst. Which of the two had the justest ground of com-
plaint it would not be easy to ascertain : but it is clear that neither of
them could have felt secure that the other would not take against him
the first advantage that offered; and it was necessary for Henry, on en-
tering into a war with France, to make himself safe on the Scotch side.
He was now well furnished with money and with troops, and well sec-
onded by his people, and therefore in a good condition to treat. (It was
partly with this view probably that he commenced his preparations for
the French invasion so long before the time.) Commissioners had been
appointed in April and again in June, both to settle complaints concern-
ing breaches of the existing truce and to treat for the prolongation of it;
but nothing seems to have been concluded. Immediately upon its ex-
piration followed the declaration of war, which had better success : for
new commissioners being presently sent by Henry (22nd of October) on
the same errand, they were met by commissioners on the other side,
and on the 21st of December following a new truce was agreed upon
between them, which was to last for five years. Henry ratified it at
once (9th of January, 1491-2); but James, it seems, demurred; and a
truce for nine months only was in the end concluded. It was to com-
mence on the 20th of February and last till the 20th November, 1492 :
and was ratified by James on the 18th of March. See Rymer.
1 7 H. 7. c. 1, 2. Veluti circa severam anhnadversionem in capitaneos
qui aut stipewUa militum mortuorum vel absentium in raliones suas rej'errent,
aut ttiam slipendia militum detinerent. Severe eliam sancitum est contra
milites qui post delectum habiium sine licentia se substraherent. Etiam pro-
tectiones quae, prius lege communi in usu erant pro iis qui militabant, statuto
roboratcB sunt.
2 Thereby releasing them from the charges which were due to the
crown in that case: ne aliquid inde pro eorwn alienatiunibus reyi solverent.
186 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Avar ; and lastly the voiding of all Scotchmen out of
England.
There was also a statute for the dispersing of the
standard of the exchequer throughout England, there-
by to size weights and measures ; l and two or three
more of less importance.
After the Parliament was broken up (which lasted
not long) the King went on with his preparations
for the war of France ; yet neglected not in the
mean time the affairs of Maximilian, for the quiet-
ing of Flanders and restoring him to his authority
amongst his subjects. For at that time the Lord of
Ravenstein, being not only a subject rebelled but a
servant revolted (and so much the more malicious
and violent), by the aid of Bruges and Gaunt had
taken the town and both the castles of Sluice (as
we said before) ; and having by the commodity of
the haven gotten together certain ships and barks,
fell to a kind of piratical trade ; robbing and spoil-
ing and taking prisoners the ships and vessels of all
nations that passed alongst that coast towards the
mart of Antwerp, or into any part of Brabant, Zea-
land, or Friezeland ; being ever well victualled from
Picardy, besides the commodity of victuals from Sluice
and the country adjacent, and the avails of his own
prizes. The French assisted him still under-hand ;
and he likewise (as all men do that have been on
both sides) thought himself not safe, except he de-
pended upon a third person. There was a small town
some two miles from Bruges towards the sea, called
1 7 H. 7. c. 3. Ut exemplar ponderum et mensurarum quod in scacchario
regis ut authenticum repositum est, in universum regnum disperyeretur ; et
pondera atque mensurce ubique ad earn normam examinarentur et reducerentur.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 187
Dam ; which was a fort and approach to Bruges,
and had a relation also to Sluice. This town the
King of the Romans had attempted often (not for
any worth of the town in itself, but because it might
choke Bruges, and cut it off from the sea) ; and
ever failed. But therewith the Duke of Saxony
came down into Flanders, taking upon him the per-
son of an umpire, to compose things between Max-
imilian and his subjects ; but being (indeed) fast and
assured to Maximilian. Upon this pretext of neu-
trality and treaty, he repaired to Bruges, desiring
of the states of Bruges to enter peaceably into their
town, with a retinue of some number of men of arms
fit for his estate, being somewhat the more (as he
said) the better to guard him in a country that was
up in arms ; and bearing them in hand that he was
to communicate with them of divers matters of great
importance for their good ; which having obtained
of them, he sent his carriages and harbingers be-
fore him to provide his lodging ; so that his men of
war entered the city in good array, but in peace-
able manner,1 and he followed. They that went
before inquired still for inns and lodgings, as if
they would have rested there all night ; and so
went on till they came to the gate that leadeth
directly towards Dam ; and they of Bruges only
gazed upon them, and gave them passage. The
captains and inhabitants of Dam also suspected no
harm from any that passed through Bruges ; and
discovering forces afar off, supposed they had been
some succours that were come from their friends,
knowing some dangers towards them : and so per-
1 This clause is omitted in the translation.
188 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
ceiving nothing but well till it was too late, suf-
fered them to enter their town. By which kind
of slight, rather than stratagem, the town of Dam
was taken, and the town of Bruges shrewdly blocked
up, whereby they took great discouragement. The
Duke of Saxony, having won the town of Dam,
sent immediately to the King1 to let him know
that it was Sluice chiefly and the Lord Ravenstein
that kept the rebellion of Flanders in life; and that
if it pleased the King to besiege it by sea, he also
would besiege it by land, and so cut out the core
of those wars. The King, willing to uphold the
authority of Maximilian (the better to hold France
in awe),2 and being likewise sued unto by his mer-
chants, for that the seas were much infested by the
barks of the Lord Ravenstein, sent straightways Sir
Edward Poynings,3 a valiant man and of good ser-
vice, with twelve ships, well furnished with soldiers
and artillery, to clear the seas, and to besiege Sluice
on that part. The Englishmen did not only coop
up the Lord Ravenstein, that he stirred not, and
likewise hold in strait siege the maritime part of
the town, but also assailed one of the castles, and
renewed the assault so for twenty days' space (is-
suing still out of their ships at the ebb), as they
made great slaughter of them of the castle, who con-
tinually fought with them to repulse them ; though
of the English part also were slain a brother of
1 i. e. to King Henry. The Latin has Henricum Regem.
'l Ut frceno Gallia, esset. Maximilian's territory, lying along the north-
eastern border of France, not only checked her encroachments on that side,
but could be used to effect a diversion and so prevent her from concentrat-
ing her forces elsewhere: as we have seen in the case of Brittany in 1489.
3 This according to Rapin (whose dates however are not to be toe
much trusted) was in the middle of 1492.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 189
the Earl of Oxford's, and some fifty more. But the
siege still continuing more and more strait ; and
both the castles (which were the principal strength
of the town) being distressed, the one by the Duke
of Satxony, and the other by the English ; and a
bridge of boats, which the Lord Ravenstein had
made between both castles, whereby succours and
relief might pass from the one to the other, being on
a night set on fire by the English ; he despairing to
hold the town, yielded (at the last) the castles to
the English, and the town to the Duke of Saxony,
by composition. Which done, the Duke of Saxony
and Sir Edward Poynings treated with them of Bru-
ges to submit themselves to Maximilian their lord ;
which after some time they did, paying (in some
good part) the charge of the war, whereby the Al-
mains and foreign succours were dismissed. The
example of Bruges other of the revolted towns fol-
lowed; so that Maximilian grew to be out of dan-
ger, but (as his manner was to handle matters) nev-
er out of necessity. And Sir Edward Poynings
(after he had continued at Sluice some good while
till all things were settled) returned unto the King,
being then before Bulloigne.1
Somewhat about this time2 came letters from Ferdi-
nando and Isabella, King and Queen of Spain, signify-
ing the final conquest of Granada from the Moors ;
which action, in itself so worthy, King Ferdinando
(whose manner was never to lose any virtue for the
1 Sometime, therefore, between the 19th of October and the 7th or 8th
of November, 1492.
2 Earlier, if Rapin's date does not put the expedition of Sir Edward
Poinings too late. The solemnity in St. Paul's was on the 6th of April,
1492. See old Chron. (Cott. Vitei. A, xvi. p. 161.).
190 HISTOEY OF KING HENRY VII.
shewing) had expressed and displayed in his letters
at large ; with all the particularities and religious
punctos and ceremonies, that were observed in the re-
ception of that city and kingdom : * shewing amongst
other things, that the King would not by any means
in person enter the city, until he had first aloof seen
the cross set up upon the greater tower of Granada,
whereby it became Christian ground : that likewise
before he would enter he did homage to God above,
pronouncing by an herald from the height of that
tower, that he did acknowledge to have recovered
that kingdom by the help of God Almighty, and the
glorious Virgin, and the virtuous Apostle Saint James,
and the holy father Innocent the Eighth, together
with the aids and services of his prelates, nobles, and
commons : that yet he stirred not from his camp, till
he had seen a little army of martyrs, to the number
of seven hundred and more Christians (that had lived
in bonds and servitude as slaves2 to the Moors), pass
before his eyes, singing a psalm for their redemption ;
and that he had given tribute unto God, by alms and
relief extended to them all, for his admission into the
city. These things were in the letters, with many
more ceremonies of a kind of holy ostentation. The
King, ever willing to put himself into the consort or
quire of all religious actions, and naturally affecting
much the King of Spain (as far as one King can affect
another), partly for his virtue and partly for a counter-
poise to France ; upon the receipt of these letters sent
all his nobles and prelates that were about the court,3
1 Ejus regni.
'2 The translation has crudelissima servitute.
3 The translation has urbem et aulam.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 191
together with the mayor and aldermen of London, in
great solemnity to the Church of Paul's ; there to hear
a declaration from the Lord Chancellor, now Cardinal.
When they were assembled, the Cardinal, standing
upon the uppermost step or half-pace before the quire,
and all the nobles, prelates, and governors of the City
at the foot of the stairs, made a speech to them ; letting
them know, that they were assembled * in that conse-
crated place to sing unto God a new song. For that
(said he) these many years the Christians have not
gained new ground or territory upon the Infidels,2 nor
enlarged and set further the bounds of the Christian
world. But this is now done by the prowess and devo-
tion of Ferdinando and Isabella, Kings of Spain ; who
have to their immortal honour recovered the great and
rich kingdom of Granada and the populous and mighty
city of the same name from the Moors,3 having been in
possession thereof by the space of seven hundred years
and more ; for which this assembly and all Christians
are to render all laud and thanks unto God, and to
celebrate this noble act of the King of Spain, who in
this is not only victorious but apostolical, in the gaining
of new provinces to the Christian faith ; and the rather
for that this victory and conquest is obtained without
much effusion of blood ; whereby it is to be hoped that
there shall be gained not only new territory, but infinite
souls to the church of Christ ; whom the Almighty (as
it seems) would have live to be converted. Herewithal
ie did relate some of the most memorable particulars
f the war and victory. And after his speech ended,
1 Ex regis mandate convenisse.
2 Saracenis et Mahumetanis.
8 A Saracenis.
192 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
the whole assembly went solemnly in procession, and
Te Deum was sung.
Immediately after the solemnity,1 the King kept his
May-day of his palace at Shine (now Richmond) ;
where to warm the blood of his nobility and gallants
against the war, he kept great triumphs of justing and
tourney during all that month. In which space it so
fell out, that Sir James Parker and Hugh Vaughan
one of the King's gentlemen ushers, having had a
controversy touching certain arms that the King-at-
Arms had given Vaughan, were appointed to run some
courses one against another ; and by accident of a
faulty helmet that Parker had on, he was stricken into
the mouth at the first course, so that his tongue was
borne unto the hinder part of his head, in such sort
that he died presently upon the place ; which because
of the controversy precedent, and the death that fol-
lowed, was accounted amongst the vulgar as a combat
or trial of right.
The King towards the end of this summer, having
put his forces wherewith he meant to invade France in
readiness (but so as they were not yet met or mustered
together), sent Urswick, now made his almoner, and
Sir John Risley to Maximilian, to let him know that
he was in arms, ready to pass the seas into France, and
did but expect to hear from him when and where he
did appoint to join with him, according to his promise
made unto him by Countebalt his ambassador.
The English ambassadors having repaired to Maxi-
milian did find his power and promise at a very great
distance ; he being utterly unprovided of men, money,
and arms, for any such enterprise. For Maximilian
1 Non muliis diebus ab hac solemnitate.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 193
having neither wing to fly on, for that his patrimony of
Austria was not in his hands (his father being then liv-
ing), and on the other side his matrimonial territories
of Flanders were * partly in dower to his mother-in-law,
and partly not serviceable in respect of the late rebel-
lions,2 was thereby destitute of means to enter into war.
The ambassadors saw this well, but wisely thought fit to
advertise the King thereof, rather than to return them-
selves, till the King's further pleasure were known : the
rather, for that Maximilian himself spake as great as
ever he did before, and entertained them with dilatory
answers ; so as the formal part of their ambassage might
well warrant and require their further stay. The
King hereupon, who doubted as much before, and saw
through his business from the beginning, wrote back to
the ambassadors, commending their discretion in not
returning, and willing them to keep the state wherein
they found Maximilian as a secret, till they heard fur-
ther from him ; and meanwhile went on with his voyage
royal for France ; suppressing for a time this adver-
tisement touching Maximilian's poverty and disability.
By this time was drawn together a great and puis-
Isant army unto the City of London ; in which were
Thomas Marquis Dorset, Thomas Earl of Arundel,
Thomas Earl of Derby, George Earl of Shrewsbury,
Edmond Earl of Suffolk, Edward Earl of Devonshire,
George Earl of Kent, the Earl of Essex, Thomas Earl
of Ormond, with a great number of barons, knights,
and principal gentlemen ; and amongst them Richard
Thomas, much noted for the brave troops that he
brought out of Wales ; the army rising in the whole
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has "being."
2 Recentibus rebellionibus exhausta.
VOL. XI. 13
194 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
to the number of five and twenty thousand foot, and
sixteen hundred horse ; over which the King (constant
in his accustomed trust and employment) made Jasper
Duke of Bedford and John Earl of Oxford generals
under his own person. The ninth of September, in
the eighth year of his reign, he departed from Green-
wich towards the sea ; all men wondering that he took
that season (being so near winter) to begin the war,
and some thereupon gathering it was a sign that the
war would not be long. Nevertheless the King gave
out the contrary, thus ; That he intending not to make
a summer business of it, but a resolute war (without
term prefixed) until he had recovered France, it skilled
not much when he began it ; especially having Calais
at his back, where he might winter, if the reason of
the war so required. The sixth of October he em-
barked at Sandwich ; and the same day took land at
Calais, which was the rendezvous where all his forces
were assigned to meet. But in this his journey tow-
ards the sea-side (wherein for the cause that we shall
now speak of he hovered so much the longer), he had
received letters from the Lord Cordes (who the hotter
he was against the English in time of war had the more
credit in a negotiation of peace, and besides was held a
man open and of good faith) ; in which letters there
was made an overture of peace from the French King,
with such conditions as were somewhat to the King's
taste ; but this was carried at the first with wonderful
secrecy. The King was no sooner come to Calais, but
the calm winds of peace began to blow. For first the
English ambassadors returned out of Flanders from
Maximilian, and certified the King that he was not to
hope for any aid from Maximilian, for that he was
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 195
altogether unprovided. His will was good, but he
lacked money. And this was made known and spread
throughout the army. And although the English were
therewithal nothing dismayed, and that it be the man-
ner of soldiers upon bad news to speak the more
bravely;1 yet nevertheless it was a kind of prepara-
tive to a peace. Instantly in the neck of this (as the
King had laid it) came news that Ferdinando and
Isabella, Kings of Spain, had concluded a peace with
King Charles, and that Charles had restored unto them
the counties of Ruscignon and Perpignian, which for-
merly were mortgaged by John King of Arragon,
Ferdinando's father, unto France, for three hundred
thousand crowns : which debt was also upon this peace
by Charles clearly released. This came also hand-
somely to put on the peace, both because so potent a
confederate2 was fallen off, and because it was a fair
example of a peace bought ; so as the King should not
be the sole merchant in this peace. Upon these airs
of peace, the King was content that the Bishop of
Exeter and the Lord Daubigny (Governor of Calais)
should give a meeting unto the Lord Cordes, for the
treaty of a peace : but himself nevertheless and his
army, the fifteenth of October, removed from Calais,
and in four days' march sat him down before Bulloigne.
During this siege of Bulloigne (which continued
near a month) there passed no memorable action nor
accident of war. Only Sir John Savage, a valiant
captain, was slain, riding about the walls of the town
to take a view. The town was both well fortified and
well manned ; yet it was distressed, and ready for an
1 Ex malis nuntiis mayisjieri alacres et erectos et magnificentius loqui
2 Qualis fuerit Ferdinandus.
196 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
assault ; which if it had been given (as was thought)
would have cost much blood ; but yet the town would
have been carried in the end. Meanwhile a peace
was concluded by the commissioners, to continue for
both the Kings' lives. Where there was no article of
importance ; being in effect rather a bargain than a
treaty. For all things remained as they were, save
that there should be paid to the King seven hundred
forty-five thousand ducats in present, for his charges
in that journey ; and five and twenty thousand crowns
yearly, for his charges sustained in the aids of the
Britons.1 For which annual, though he had Maxi-
milian bound before for those charges, yet he counted
the alteration of the hand as much as the principal
debt ; 2 and besides it was left somewhat indefinitely 3
1 So Speed; quoting the authority partly of Polydore and partly of a
MS. Polydore's words are " Sumrna autem pactionis foederis fuit, ut
Carohis primum solveret bene magnam pecuniae summam Henrico pro
sumptibus in id bellum factis, juxta sestimationem legatorum ; deinde in
singulos annos millia aureorum vicena quina penderet per aliquot annos
pro impensa ab ipso Henrico facta in copias quas Britannis auxilio misis-
set." Speed substituted this specific " 745,000 ducats (186,250 pounds
English)" to be paid in present, for the bene magnam pecunice summam;
repeating in other respects Polydore's statement.
The old Chronicle, speaking upon the authority of the King's own letter
to the City, which was read at Guildhall on the 9th of November, says
only that " for to have this peace established the French King granted
unto our sovereign lord, to be paid in certain years, 745,000 scutis; which
amounteth in sterling money to 127,666/. 13s. 4<£. And this, it appears
from Rymer, is the correct statement. Henry reckoned the expenses
incurred in the defence of Brittany (for which the French Queen was
bound ) at 620,000 crowns (escus d'or) and the sum remaining due upon the
pension granted to Edward IV. by Lewis XI. at 125,000. He was now to
give up his claim to both these sums in consideration of an annual pay-
ment by the French King of 50,000 francs, to commence the 1st of May
next, and be continued from half year to half year until the whole 745,000
crowns were paid.
2 i. e. worth as much as the whole sum. Debitoris mutationem non minus
quam si debitum ipsum esset persalulum astimabat.
8 Polydore says per aliquot annos. And adds " Franci reges postea, bello
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 197
when it should determine or expire ; which made the
English esteem it as a tribute carried under fair terms.
And the truth is, it was paid both to the King and
to his son Henry the Eighth, longer than it could
continue upon any computation of charges. There
was also assigned by the French King unto all the
King's principal counsellors great pensions, besides
rich gifts for the present ; which whether the King
did permit, to save his own purse from rewards, or
to communicate the envy of a business that was dis-
pleasing to his people, was diversely interpreted: for
certainly the King had no great fancy to own this
Italico implicate, id annuum vectigal etiara Henrico octavo, septimi filio,
pependerunt: quo tandem debitam pecuniam persolverent amicitiamque
servarent:" which Speed renders thus, "which (by the English called
tribute) was duly paid during all this King's reign and also to Henry his
son, till the whole debt was run out; thereby to preserve amity with Eng-
land." Id vectigal was the millia aureorum vicena quina ; which, con-
tinued into Henry VIII. 's reign, would have risen at the very least to
425,000 of these aurei; making (if they are rightly translated crowns) the
whole sum 1,170,000 crowns, or 234,000/. : a fact which would have amply
justified Bacon's remark, a few lines further on, that the annual payments
could not have continued so long " upon any computation of charges." As
it was, the continuation of the payments beyond the date of Henry VH.'s
death is sufficiently explained. The whole sum of 745,000 crowns was to
be paid off by half-yearly instalments of 25,000 francs in crowns of gold;
each franc worth 20 sols, each crown worth 35 sols; at which rate it
would take more than 25 years to pay the whole ; 10 years after the death
of Henry VII. Bernard Andre" misrepresents the fact, but probably repre-
sents the popular opinion in England, in calling it a tribute granted in con-
sideration of our French possessions. " Quocirca (he says) pactionibus
utrinque transactis scriptoque solemniter commendatis, antiquum jus suum
sub tributo, ut alii sui sanguinis antecessores, poposcit; quod quidem gra-
tiocissime a rege Gallia? concessum est."
The half-yearly payments were in fact continued till the year 1514;
when in consideration of a new claim made by Henry VIII. as heir to
Margaret Duchess of Somerset, which (together with what then remained
unpaid of the 745,000 crowns) was estimated at a million crowns, Lewis
bound himself to pay that sum by half-yearly instalments of 50,000 francs
each. See Rymer, xiii. p. 428.
198 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
peace ; and therefore a little before it was concluded,
he had under-hand procured some of his best captains
and men of war to advise him to a peace under their
hands, in an earnest manner, in the nature of a sup-
plication. But the truth is, this peace was welcome
to both Kings ; to Charles, for that it assured unto
him the possession of Brittaine, and freed the enter-
prise of Naples ; to Henry, for that it filled his coffers ;
and that he foresaw at that time a storm of inward
troubles coming upon him, which presently after brake
forth. But it gave no less discontent to the nobility
and principal persons of the army,1 who had many
of them sold or engaged their estates upon the hopes
of the war. They stuck not to say, That the King
cared not to plume his nobility and people, to feather
himself. And some made themselves merry with that
the King had said in Parliament ; That after the war
was once begun, he doubted not but to make it pay
it itself; saying he had kept promise.
Having risen from Bulloigne, he went to Calais,
where he stayed some time : from whence also he
writ letters 2 (which was a courtesy that he sometimes
used) to the Mayor of London and the Aldermen his
brethren ; half bragging what great sums he had ob-
tained for the peace ; knowing well that full coffers
1 In the translation, — remembering probably the supplication of the
captains and the men of war, — he adds utcunque nonnulli ex Us ad ejus
nutum se accommoddssent.
2 They were read at Guildhall on the 9th of November. Old Chron.
Vitel. A. xvi. fo. 145. b.
This is the treaty which in our modern historians goes by the name of
the treaty of Estdples. It is worthy of remark that on the Sunday on
which it was concluded (3rd November, 1492), the truce with Scotland
which was to expire on the 20th of that month, was continued till the 30th
of April, 1494. See Rot. Scot. ii. p. 509.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 199
of the King is ever good news to London ; and bet-
ter news it would have been, if their benevolence had
been but a loan. And upon the seventeenth of Sep-
tember following he returned to Westminster, where
he kept his Christmas.
Soon after the King's return, he sent the Order of
the Garter to Alphonso Duke of Calabria, eldest son
to Ferdinando King of Naples. An honour sought
by that Prince to hold him up in the eyes of the
Italians ; who expecting the arms of Charles, made
great account of the amity of England for a bridle
to France. It was received by Alphonso with all the
ceremony and pomp that could be devised ; as things
use to be carried that are intended for opinion. It
was sent by Urswick ; upon whom the King bestowed
this ambassage, to help him after many dry employ-
ments.
At this time the King began again to be haunted
with sprites ; by the magic and curious arts of the
Lady Margaret ; who raised up the ghost of Richard
Duke of York (second son to King Edward the
Fourth) to walk and vex the King. This was a
finer counterfeit stone than Lambert Symnell ; better
done, and worn upon greater hands ; being graced
after with the wearing of a King of France and a
King of Scotland, not of a Duchess of Burgundy
only. And for Symnell, there was not much in him,
more than that he was a handsome boy, and did not
shame his robes. But this youth (of whom we are
now to speak) was such a mercurial, as the like hath
seldom been known ; and could make his own part,
if any time he chanced to be out. Wherefore this
being one of the strangest examples of a personation,
200 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
that ever was in elder or later times, it deserveth to
be discovered and related at the fall: although the
King's manner of shewing things by pieces, and dark-
lights, hath so muffled it, that it hath left it almost
as a mystery to this day.
The Lady Margaret, whom the King's friends called
Juno, because she was to him as Juno was to ^Eneas,
stirring both heaven and hell to do him mischief, for
a foundation of her particular practices against him
did continually by all means possible nourish, main-
tain, and divulge the flying opinion that Richard
Duke of York (second son to Edward the Fourth)
was not murdered in the Tower (as was given out)
but saved alive ; for that those who were employed
in that barbarous fact, having destroyed the elder
brother, were stricken with remorse and compassion
towards the younger, and set him privily at liberty
to seek his fortune. This lure she cast abroad, think-
ing that this fame and belief (together with the fresh
example of Lambert Symnell) would draw at one
time or other some birds to strike upon it. She
used likewise a further diligence, not committing all
to chance : for she had some secret espials, (like to
the Turks commissioners for children of tribute,1)
to look abroad for handsome and graceful youths, to
make Plantagenets and Dukes of York. At the last
she did light on one, in whom all things met, as one
would wish, to serve her turn for a counterfeit of
Richard Duke of York. This was Perkin Warbeck,
whose adventures we shall now describe. For first,
the years agreed well. Secondly, he was a youth of
1 Turcorum minislris qui puerorum tributum exigunt.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 201
fine favour and shape ; * but more than that, he had
such a crafty and bewitching fashion2 both to move
pity and to induce belief, as was like a kind of fasci-
nation and inchantment to those that saw him or
heard "him. Thirdly, he had been from his childhood
such a wanderer, or (as the King called it) such a
landloper, as it was extreme hard to hunt out his
nest and parents ; neither again could any man, by
company or conversing with him, be able to say or
detect well what he was ; he did so flit from place
to place. Lastly, there was a circumstance (which
is mentioned by one that writ in the same time) that
is very likely to have made somewhat to the matter ; 8
which is, that King Edward the Fourth was his god-
father.4 Which, as it is somewhat suspicious for a
1 Oris elegantia et corporis lineamentis cum dignitate quadam amabilis.
2 Mores et gestus ejus tarn erant vafri et quasi veneficiis quibusdam obliti.
8 Ees quwdam levis .... quam tamen probabile est ad ea quae, postea gesta
sunt nonnihil atlulisse, eisque tanquam ansam praibuisse.
4 This fact is derived from Speed, whose words are " this yxmth was
born (they say) in the city of Torney and called Peter Warbeck; the son
of a converted Jew, whose godfather at baptism King Edward himself
was." But Speed meant that King Edward was godfather not to Perkin,
but to the Jew when he was christened. The fact comes from Bernard
Andre\ who mentions it with reference to the Jew's name, which was
Edward. He does not say however that Perkin was his son : but only
that he was brought up {educalum) by him. His words are " Petreium
quendam Tornacensem, ab Eduardo quodam Judeo, postea a rege Eduardo
sacro levato fonte, in hac regione educatum." And in another place he
makes Perkin speak of himself as having been in his childhood " Eduardi
Judei ac ante memorati regis Eduardi filioli in Anglia servulus." The
mistake was pointed out by Sir Frederic Madden in the Archseologia,
vol. xxvii. p. 163.
Of course Bacon's speculation upon the circumstance must be set
I aside; being built entirely upon the supposition that it was Perkin him-
self to whom King Edward stood godfather. And the true story (if
Andre's authority, uncorroborated by Perkin's confession or by any other
contemporary report, be good enough to make it pass for true) is perhaps
202 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
wanton prince to become gossip in so mean a house,
and might make a man think that he might indeed
have in him some base blood of the house of York ;
so at the least (though that were not) it might give
the occasion to the boy, in being called King Ed-
ward's godson, or perhaps in sport King Edward's
son, to entertain such thoughts into his head. For
tutor he had none (for ought that appears1), as Lam-
bert Symnell had, until he came unto the Lady Mar-
garet who instructed him.2
Thus therefore it came to pass. There was a towns-
man of Tournay that had borne office in that town,
whose name was John Osbeck, (a converted Jew,3)
married to Katheren de Faro, whose business drew
him to live for a time with his wife at London in Kino-
Edward the Fourth's days ; during which time he had
a son by her ; and being known in court, the King-
either out of religious nobleness, because he was a
convert, or upon some private acquaintance, did him
educalum and servulus, — whether that Perkin was pupil or clerk or ap-
prentice or servant or adopted son to the Jew in question, — we must at
least suppose that, in one capacity or another, he was in his family. Now
we have it upon the same authority that this Jew was well acquainted
with King Edward and his children — "erat enim ille patronns meus "
he makes Perkin say, " regi Eduardo ac suis liberis familiarissimus; "
Perkin must at least therefore have seen the person of Edward IV., and
may very likely have seen something of his court and of his humours: the
recollection of which, though not likely to have put it into his head to
assume such a part, would be of great use in enabling him to play it. He
was about ten years old when Edward died: and a quick-witted boy with
a natural gift that way, such as he must have had, might easily at an
earlier age than that have observed enough to enable him to fill up the
outlines of the story which he had to tell with a great resemblance to the
truth.
1 This is omitted in the translation.
2 Quae eum in omnibus egregie inslruxit.
8 So MS. Ed. 1622 has u a convert-Jew."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 203
the honour as to be godfather to his child,1 and named
him Peter. But afterwards proving a dainty and ef-
feminate youth, he was commonly called by the dimin-
utive of his name, Peterkin, or Perkin. For as for the
name of Warbeck, it was given him when they did
but guess at it, before examinations had been taken.
But yet he had been so much talked on by that name,
as it stuck by him after his true name of Osbeck was
known. While he was a young child, his parents re-
turned with him to Tournay. Then was he placed in
a house of a kinsman of his, called John Stenbeck, at
Antwerp, and so roamed2 up and down between Ant-
werp and Tournay and other towns of Flanders for
a good time ; living much in English company, and
having the English tongue perfect. In which time,
being grown a comely youth, he was brought by some
of the espials of the Lady Margaret into her presence :
who viewing him well, and seeing that he had a face
and personage that would bear a noble fortune ; and
finding him otherwise of a fine spirit and winning be-
haviour ; thought she had now found a curious piece
of marble to carve out an image of a Duke of York.
1 See note 4. p. 201. It is to be observed that these particulars are col-
lected by combining Perkin's confession with Bernard Andrews statement,
as Bacon misunderstood it. There is no reason that I know of to suppose
that John Osbeck was a Jew, or that he and his wife were ever in London.
To correct the story, we must substitute — " There was a townsman, &c,
whose name was John Osbeck, married to Catherine de Faro, by whom
he had a son that was named Peter. But afterwards, proving a dainty
and effeminate youth, &c. &c. While he was a young child he was taken
(it seems) to London, and lived there in the house of one Edward, a Jew,
that was converted in King Edward IV.'s time; the King himself, either
out of religious nobleness (because he was a convert), or upon some pri-
vate acquaintnnce, doing him the honour to be his godfather. After he
had staid in England some little while, he returned to Tournay. Then
was he placed," &c.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has "roved."
204 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
She kept him by her a great while, but with extreme
secrecy. The while she instructed him by many cab-
inet conferences ; First, in princely behaviour and
gesture ; teaching him how he should keep state, and
yet with a modest sense of his misfortunes : Then she
informed him of all the circumstances and particulars
that concerned the person of Richard Duke of York,
which he was to act ; describing unto him the per-
sonages, lineaments, and features of the King and
Queen his pretended parents, and of his brother and
sisters, and divers others that were nearest him in his
childhood, together with all passages, some secret, some
common, that were fit for a child's memory, until the
death of King Edward. Then she added the partic-
ulars of the time from the King's death until he and
his brother were committed to the Tower, as well
during the time he was abroad as while he was in
sanctuary. As for the times while he was in the
Tower, and the manner of his brother's death, and his
own escape ; she knew they were things that a veiy
few could controul.1 And therefore she taught him
only to tell a smooth and likely tale of those matters ;
warning him not to vary from it. It was agreed like-
wise between them what account he should give of his
peregrination abroad ; intermixing many things which
were true and such as they knew others could testify,
for the credit of the rest ; but still making them to
hang together with the part he was to play. She
taught him likewise how to avoid sundry captious and
tempting questions, which were like to be asked of
1 1. e. could correct him in. Tarn clandestina fuisse, ut pauci admodum,
qumcunque ei confingere liberet, arguere possent ; itaque libero prorsus men-
dado se uti posse.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 205
him. But in this she found him of himself so nimble
and shifting,1 as she trusted much to his own wit
and readiness ; and therefore laboured the less in it.
Lastly, she raised his thoughts with some present re-
wards and further promises ; setting before him chiefly
the glory and fortune of a crown, if things went well ;
and a sure refuge to her court if the worst should fall.
After such time as she thought he was perfect in his
lesson, she began to cast with herself from what coast
this blazing star should first appear, and at what time.2
It must be upon the horizon of Ireland ; for there had
the like meteor strong influence before. The time of
the apparition to be, when the King should be engaged
into a war with France. But well she knew that
whatsoever should come from her would be held sus-
pected. And therefore if he should go out of Flanders
immediately into Ireland she might be thought to have
some hand in it. And besides, the time was not yet
ripe ; for that the two Kings were then upon terms of
peace.3 Therefore she wheeled about ; and to put all
suspicion afar off, and loth to keep him any longer by
her (for that she knew secrets are not long-lived),
she sent him unknown into Portugal, with the Lady
Brampton, an English lady (that embarked for Por-
tugal at that time), with some privado of her own to
have an eye upon him ; and there he was to remain
1 lta instar anguillce lubricum et ad elabendum promptum reperit.
2 Ed. 1622 has no stop after "time:" which is evidently a mistake.
The Latin translation explains the intended construction of the sentence,
so that there can be no room for doubt. A qua cozli plagd cometa iste se
prima osttndere deberet, et quo tempore. Constituit autem hoc fieri oportere
ab horizonte Hibernim . . . tempus autem aj)paritionis maxime opportunum
fore cum rex, &c.
8 The translation has de pace tractarent. The time spoken of seems to
have been some time in 1490.
206 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
and to expect her further directions. In the mean
time she omitted not to prepare things for his better
welcome and accepting, not only in the kingdom of
Ireland, but in the court of France. He continued in
Portugal about a year ; and by that time the King of
England called his Parliament1 (as hath been said),
and had declared 2 open war against France. Now did
the sign reign, and the constellation was comen, under
which Perkin should appear. And therefore he was
straight sent unto by the Duchess to go for Ireland,
according to the first designment. In Ireland he did
arrive3 at the town of Cork. When he was thither
comen, his own tale was (when he made his confession
afterwards) that the Irishmen finding him in some good
clothes, came flocking about him, and bore him down
1 The Parliament, as I have said, was not called till October, 1491. But
open war was declared against France at least as early as the 7th of July-
preceding (see the preamble of the Commission for the Benevolence;
Rymer, xii. p. 446.); probably earlier; see the Commission for Array and
Musters, May 5, 1491, in which it is said that " Charles, calling himself
King of France, intends to invade the realm.'1'' Cal. Pat. Rolls, 6 Hen. VH.
p. 71.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 omits " had."
8 I have not been able to ascertain the exact date of his arrival in Ire-
land. But on the 6th of December, 1491, a Commission was issued, recit-
ing that the King had determined to send an army to parts of the counties
of Kilkenne and Typparary in the land of Ireland, to suppress his rebels
and enemies there; and appointing James Ormond, and Thomas Garth,
Esqs., captains and governors of the forces, with power to pass over the
sea and invade the land; also to take the musters of the said army and of
the king's lieges, and to make statutes and issue proclamations for the
government of the same, &c. &c. ; and declaring the power of the lieu-
tenant of Ireland suspended with respect to the said army. See Cal. Pat.
Rolls, 6 Dec. 7 Hen. VII.
As Perkin was certainly in Ireland, and in communication with the
Earl of Desmond, in the February following (see note 2. p. 207.), it is
probable that this rebellion had something to do with him. It also helps
to explain the conduct of the Scotch King with regard to the truce. See
note 2. p. 184.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 207
that he was the Duke of Clarence that had been there
before : and after, that he was Richard the Third's
base son : and lastly, that he was Richard Duke of
York, second son to Edward the Fourth : but that he
for his part renounced all these things, and offered to
swear upon the holy Evangelists that he was no such
man, till at last they forced it upon him,1 and bad him
fear nothing ; and so forth. But the truth is, that
immediately upon his coming into Ireland, he took
upon him the said person of the Duke of York, and
drew unto him complices and partakers by all the
means he could devise. Insomuch as he writ his let-
ters unto the Earls of Desmond and Kildare,2 to come
in to his aid and be of his party ; the originals of
which letters are yet extant.
Somewhat before this time,3 the Duchess had also
gained unto her a near servant of King Henry's own,
1 Pi quadam ad quicquid Mi vellent agnoscendum eum adegisseni.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " wrote." This statement is accidentally con-
firmed by an entry in the Treasurer's Books of Scotland, quoted by Tytler,
vol. iv. p. 373. : — " Given at the King's command to an Englishman, called
Edward Ormond, that brought letters forth of Ireland fra King Edward's
son and the Earl of Desmond, ix lb." The entry is dated March 2, 1491;
that is, of course, 1491-2 : a date worth remarking in connexion with the
refusal of the Scotch King to ratify the five-years' truce with England
which was concluded by the Commissioners in the preceding December
and signed by Henry on the 12th of January. The arrival and reception
of Perkin in Ireland would be a sufficient motive to make James unwil-
ling to bind himself to peace with Henry for so long a period. See note
2. p. 184. By the time the nine-months' truce that was substituted was
about to expire, Henry had made his peace with France, and Perkin
had been sent away from the French court. And then it was that
James agreed to prolong the truce for a year and a half. See note 2.
p. 198.
8 The Latin translation has circa idem tempus. Perkin in his confes-
sion mentions Maister Stephen Fryam as one of the persons sent from
France to invite him to the French court. Another French secretary
was appointed by the King on the 16th of June, 1490. See Cal. Pat
r
208 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
one Stephen Frion, his secretary for the French
tongue ; an active man, but turbulent and discon-
tented. This Frion had fled over to Charles the
French King, and put himself into his service, at
such time as he began to be in open enmity with
the King.1 Now King Charles, when he understood
of the person and attempts of Perkin, ready of him-
self to embrace all advantages against the King of
England, instigated by Frion, and formerly prepared
by the Lady Margaret, forthwith despatched one
Lucas and this Frion in nature2 of ambassadors to
Perkin, to advertise him of the King's good inclina-
tion to him, and that he was resolved to aid him
to recover his right against King Henry, an usurper
of England and an enemy of France ; and wished him
to come over unto him at Paris. Perkin thought
himself in heaven now that he was invited by so
great a King in so honourable a manner. And im-
parting unto his friends in Ireland for their encour-
agement how fortune called him, and what great hopes
he had, sailed presently into France. When he was
comen to the court of France, the King received him
with great honour, saluted, and stiled him by the name
of the Duke of York, lodged him and accommo-
dated him in great state ; and the better to give him
the representation and the countenance of a Prince,
assigned him a guard for his person, whereof the Lord
Congresall was captain. And the courtiers likewise
(though it be ill mocking with the French 3) applied
1 i. e. as King Charles began to be in open enmity with King Henry.
The Latin translation expresses it more correctly: quo tempore helium inter
reges pnllulare cospisset.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " in the nature."
8 i. e. though they are not good at playing a part. Licet apud Gallos
ludos facer e inproclivi non sit.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 209
themselves to their King's bent, seeing there was rea-
son of state for it. At the same time there repaired
unto Perkin divers Englishmen of quality ; Sir George
Neville, Sir John Taylor, and about one hundred
more j~ and amongst the rest, this Stephen Frion of
whom we spake, who followed his fortune both then
and for a long time after, and was indeed his principal
counsellor and instrument in all his proceedings. But
all this on the French King's part was but a trick, the
better to bow King Henry to peace. And therefore
upon the first grain of incense that was sacrificed upon
the altar of peace at Bulloigne, Perkin was smoked
away. Yet would not the French King deliver him
up to King Henry (as he was laboured to do *), for
his honour's sake ; but warned him away and dis-
missed him. And Perkin on his part was as ready
to be gone, doubting he might be caught up under-
hand. He therefore took his way into Flanders unto
the Duchess of Burgundy ; pretending that having
been variously tossed by fortune he directed his course
thither as to a safe harbour ; no ways taking knowl-
edge that he had ever been there before, but as if that
had been his first address. The Duchess on the other
part made it as new and strange to see him ; and pre-
tending at the first she2 was taught and made wise by
the example of Lambert Symnell, how she did admit
1 Licet ab eo de hoc interpeUalus.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 omits "and" before "pretending," inserts "that"
before " she," and has a full stop after " satisfied; " — a correction possi-
bly,— to avoid the awkwardness of the repetition; which however it
hardly removes. The construction as it stands is more natural, and the
only change wanted is the substitution of some equivalent phrase for
" pretending at the first."
VOL. xi. 14
210 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
of any counterfeit stuff (though even in that she said
she was not fully satisfied), she pretended at the first
(and that was ever in the presence of others) to pose
him and sift him, thereby to try whether he were
indeed the very Duke of York or no. But seeming
to receive full satisfaction by his answers, then she
feigned herself to be transported with a kind of aston-
ishment, mixt of joy and wonder, of1 his miraculous
deliverance ; receiving him as if he were risen from
death to life ; and inferring that God, who had in such
wonderful manner preserved him from death, did like-
wise reserve him for some great and prosperous for-
tune. As for his dismission out of France, they inter-
preted it, not as if he were detected or neglected for a
counterfeit deceiver ; but contrariwise that it did shew
manifestly unto the world that he was some great mat-
ter ; for that it was his abandoning that (in effect)
made the peace ; 2 being no more but the sacrificing
of a poor distressed Prince unto the utility and am-
bition of two mighty monarchs. Neither was Perkin
for his part wanting to himself either in gracious and
princely behaviour, or in ready and apposite answers,
or in contenting and caressing those that did apply
themselves unto him, or in pretty scorns or disdains3
to those that seemed to doubt of him ; but in all
things did notably acquit himself: insomuch as it was
generally believed (as well amongst great persons as
amongst the vulgar) that he was indeed Duke Richard.
Nay himself with long and continual counterfeiting
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " at."
2 Quoniam causae ejus destitutio et desertio revera lanti erat, ut, si quis
recte animadvertat, pacem confecisset.
8 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " scorn or disdain."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 211
and with often telling a lie, was turned (by habit)
almost into the thing he seemed to be, and from a liar
to a believer.1 The Duchess therefore, as in a case
out of doubt, did him all princely honour, calling him
always by the name of her nephew, and giving him
the delicate title of the White Rose of England ; and
appointed him a guard of thirty persons, halberdiers,
clad in a party-coloured livery of murrey and blue,
to attend his person. Her court likewise, and gener-
ally the Dutch and strangers,2 in their usage towards
him expressed no less respect.
The news hereof came blazing and thundering over
into England, that the Duke of York was sure alive.
As for the name of Perkin Warbeck, it was not at
that time comen to light, but all the news ran 3 upon
the Duke of York; that he had been entertained in
Ireland, bought and sold in France, and was now
plainly avowed and in great honour in Flanders.
These fames took hold of divers ; in some upon dis-
content, in some upon ambition, in some upon levity
and desire of change, in some few upon conscience and
belief, but in most upon simplicity,4 and in divers out
of dependence upon some of the better sort who did in
secret favour and nourish these bruits. And it was
1 Quasi quce Jlngeret simul et crederet. This suggestion comes from
Speed. Shakespeare, in the Tempest, has the same thought —
"Like one
Who having unto Truth, by telling oft,
Made such a sinner of his memory
To credit his own lie, he did believe
He was indeed the Duke."
2 The translation has tarn Flandri quam peregrini : the Flemings and
strangers both.
« So Ed. 1622. The MS. has " came."
4 Imbecillitatem judicu.
212 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
not long ere these rumours of novelty had begotten
others of scandal and murmur against the King and
his government, taxing him for a great taxer of his
people and discountenancer of his nobility. The loss
of Brittaine and the peace with France were not for-
gotten ; but chiefly they fell upon the wrong that he
did his Queen, and that he did not reign in her right ;
wherefore they said that God had now brought to
light a masculine branch of the House of York that
would not be at his courtesy, howsoever he did depress
his poor lady. And yet (as it fareth in things which
are current with the multitude and which they affect)
these fames grew so general, as the authors were lost
in the generality of speakers ; they being like running
weeds that have no certain root, or like footings up
and down impossible to be traced. But after a while
these ill humours drew to an head, and settled secretly
in some eminent persons ; 1 which were Sir William
Stanley Lord Chamberlain of the King's household,
the Lord Fitzwater, Sir Symond Mountford, Sir
Thomas Thwaits. These entered into a secret con-
spiracy to favour Duke Richard's title ; nevertheless
none engaged their fortunes in this business openly but
two, Sir Robert Clifford and master William Barley,
who sailed over into Flanders, sent indeed from the
party of the conspirators here to understand the truth
of those things that passed there, and not without
some help of moneys from hence, provisionally to be
delivered — if they found and were satisfied that there
was truth in these pretences. The person of Sir
Robert Clifford (being a gentleman of fame and fam-
1 Atque occulta in viris aliquibus magna dignitatis, veluti in partibus nobili-
bus, sedes repererunt: quorum prcecipui erant, &c.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 213
ily) was extremely welcome to the Lady Margaret,
who after she had conference with him brought him
to the sight of Perkin, with whom he had often
speech and discourse. So that in the end, won either
by the Duchess to affect 1 or by Perkin to believe,
he wrote back into England, that he knew the per-
son of Richard Duke of York as well as he knew his
own, and that this young man was undoubtedly he.
By this means all things grew prepared to revolt and
sedition here, and the conspiracy came to have a cor-
respondence between Flanders and England.2
The King on his part was not asleep. But to arm
or levy forces yet, he thought he would but show fear,
and do this idol too much worship. Nevertheless the
ports he did shut up, or at least kept a watch on them,
that none should pass to or fro that was suspected.
But for the rest he chose to work by countermine.
His purposes were two ; the one to lay open the abuse ;
the other to break the knot of the conspirators.3 To
detect the abuse, there were but two ways ; the first to
make it manifest to the world that the Duke of York
was indeed murdered ; the other to prove that (were
he dead or alive) yet Perkin was a counterfeit. For
the first, thus it stood. There were but four persons
that could speak upon knowledge to the murder of the
1 The translation has ut conalibus suis faveret. From which it would
appear that the word "affect" is used here in its old sense of " to regard
with affection; " however its modern sense of " to pretend" may seem to
suit the context.
'l i. e. the conspiracy in Flanders and the conspiracy in England came
into correspondence. The expression in the Latin is more exact and
clear — Hoc modo factum est ut omnia hie in Anglid ad defectionem et sediti-
onem spectarent; et conjuratio foveri cospit mutuo tractatu inter Flandriam et
Angliam.
8 Ut conjuratos inter se committerei.
214 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Duke of York ; Sir James Tirrell (the employed-man
from King Richard), John Dighton and Myles Forrest
his servants (the two butchers or tormentors), and the
priest of the Tower that buried them ; of which four,
Myles Forrest and the priest were dead, and there re-
mained alive only Sir James Tirrell and John Dighton.
These two the King caused to be committed to the
Tower1 and examined touching the manner of the
1 This is not mentioned by any historian who preceded Bacon ; and I
have not been able to discover his authority for stating that Tirrell and
Dighton were examined on the subject at this time. The account of their
confession which follows comes no doubt from the history ascribed to Sir
Thomas More; who adds, " Very troth is it and well known that at such
time as Sir James Tirrell was in the Tower for treason committed against
the most famous prince King Henry VII., both Dighton and he were ex-
amined and confessed the murder in manner above written." But the
time when Tirrell was in the Tower for treason against Henry was many
years after, in 1502. And there is nothing in More's narrative to make
one think that he supposed the confession to have been made at an earlier
period. It was a point however in which he might easily be mistaken,
(especially if Tirrell repeated at his death the same story which he had
told before, as he very likely might), and Bacon may have had sufficient
evidence for correcting him. Certainly among the persons arrested at the
same time with Tirrell in 1502 there is no mention of Dighton.
But there is a circumstance which makes me suspect that Henry had in
fact obtained a confession from Tirrell some time before.
On the 9th of August, 1484, Sir James Tyrrell had received a grant from
Richard III. of the stewardship of the Duchy of Cornwall, and on the 13th
of September following " a grant of the offices of Sheriff of the Lordship
of Wenllouk, and steward of the Lordships of Newport, Wenllouk, Kovo-
eth-Meredith, Lavenithevery, and Lanthoesant, in Wales and the marches
thereof" (see Ninth Report of the Deputy Keeper of the Records, App.
94.); and on the 19th of February, 1485-6, he had received from Henry
himself a grant for life of the offices of Sheriff of the County of Glamor-
gan and Margannot," &c. (Cal. Pat. Rolls, i. p. 236.) Two years after
however, viz. on the 26th of February, 3 Hen. VII. (i. e. 1487-8), — I find
that a commission was granted to certain persons there named, reciting
that " in consideration of the services of Sir James Tyrrell, a knight of
the King's body, it had been granted to him to be recompensed of the
issues of the County of Guysnes in the marches of Calais, in such wise as
he holdeth him content; amounting to the value of all the profits of his
lands, rents, &c. in Wales, at the beginning of this reign: " which lands
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 215
death of the two innocent princes. They agreed both
in a tale (as the King gave out) to this effect : That
King Richard having directed his warrant for the put-
ting of them to death to Brackenbury, the Lieutenant
of the- Tower, was by him refused ; whereupon the
King directed his warrant to Sir James Tirrell to re-
ceive the keys of the Tower from the lieutenant (for
the space of a night) for the King's especial service.
That Sir James Tirrell accordingly repaired to the
Tower by night, attended by his two servants afore-
named, whom he had chosen for the * purpose. That
himself stood at the stair-foot, and sent these two vil-
lains to execute the murder. That they smothered
them in their bed ; and, that done, called up their mas-
ter to see their naked bodies dead,2 which they had
laid forth. That they were buried under the stairs,
and some stones cast upon them. That when the re-
were now transferred to the charge of the Commissioners. (Cal. Pat.
Rolls, ii. p. 89.) Now it will be remembered that in the interval between
Feb. 19, 1485-6 and Feb. 26, 1487-8 had occurred the rebellion of Lambert
Symnell, which was suppressed in the summer of 1487; and that Symnell
had been originally intended to play the part of Edward Duke of York,
one of the murdered princes. This would naturally stir Henry to search
out the history of the murder. And if in the course of his inquiries he
became acquainted with the part which Tirrell had played in it, he would
naturally wish to get him out of England as soon as he could. To punish
him for the murder, for which we must suppose that he had obtained from
Richard a full pardon, was probably not in Henry's power; and he may
very likely have elicited the confession upon a promise of not harming
him; but he would wish to get him out of the way; and for that purpose
might offer him an equivalent abroad for what he possessed at home. The
story which he told, Henry may with characteristic closeness have kept
to himself; till the appearance of Perkin Warbeck in the same character
made it expedient to divulge it. And the time when the story was "given
out " may have led to an error as to the time when the confession was
made.
i So MS. Ed. 1622 has " that."
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " naked dead bodies."
216 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
port was made to King Richard that his will was done,
he gave Sir James Tirrell great thanks ; but took ex-
ception to the place of their burial, being too 1 base for
them that were King's children ; whereupon another
night by the King's warrant renewed, their bodies
were removed by the priest of the Tower, and buried
by him in some place which (by means of the priest's
death soon after) could not be known. Thus much
was then delivered abroad, to be the effect of those ex-
aminations ; but the King nevertheless made no use of
them in any of his declarations. Whereby, as it seems,
those examinations left the business somewhat per-
plexed. And as for Sir James Tirrell, he was long2
after beheaded in the Tower-yard for other matters of
treason. But John Dighton, who it seemeth spake
best for the King, was forthwith set at liberty, and was
the principal means of divulging this tradition. There-
fore this kind of proof being left so naked,3 the King
used the more diligence in the latter, for the tracing of
Perkin. To this purpose he sent abroad into several
parts, and especially into Flanders, divers secret and
nimble scouts and spies ; some feigning themselves to
fly over unto Perkin, and to adhere unto him ; and
1 So Ed. 1622. The MS. has " so base."
2 So the MS. The edition of 1622 has "soon after:" an alteration
which can hardly have been made by Bacon, because it is inconsistent
with his own narrative. But it may very well have been hazarded by a
corrector of the press, who thought the context required it.
It must be confessed however that, if " long " be the right reading, the
sentence is oddly introduced and hardly to the purpose. And it would
rather seem as if Bacon when writing this part of his narrative had been
under a wrong impression as to the date of Tirrell's execution, and had
made the correction afterwards. This MS. is of earlier date, it is true,
than the printed book; but the book may have been printed from another
copy in which the correction had not been made.
8 i. e. ill-furnished. The translation has nudam et jejunam.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 217
some under other pretences to learn, search, and dis-
cover all the circumstances and particulars of Perkin's
parents, birth, person, travels up and down, and in
brief, to have a journal (as it were) of his life and
doings"; and1 furnished these his employed-men liber-
ally with money, to draw on and reward intelligences ;
giving them also in charge, to advertise continually
what they found, and nevertheless still to go on. And
ever as one advertisement and discovery called up an-
other, he employed other new men, where the business
did require it. Others he employed in a more special
nature and trust, to be his pioners in the main counter-
mine. These were directed to insinuate themselves
into the familiarity and confidence of the principal per-
sons of the party in Flanders, and so to learn what
associates they had and correspondents either here in
England or abroad: and how far every one was2
engaged ; and what new ones they meant afterwards
to try or board : 3 and as this for the persons, so for the
actions themselves, to discover to the bottom (as they
could) the utmost of Perkin and the conspirators their
intentions, hopes, and practices. These latter best be-
trust4 spies had some of them farther instructions, to
practice and draw off the best friends and servants of
Perkin, by making remonstrance to them how weakly
his enterprise and hopes were built, and with how pru-
dent and potent a King they had to deal ; and to rec-
oncile them to the King with promise of pardon and
good conditions of reward. And above the rest to
assail, sap, and work into the constancy of Sir Robert
i So MS. Ed. 1622 has " he furnished."
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 omits " was."
8 Tentare el allicere.
4 Exploratores pro fidelioribus habiti.
218 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Clifford, and to win him (if they could), being the
man that knew most of their secrets, and who being
won away would most appall and discourage the rest,
and in a manner break the knot. There is a strange
tradition, that the King lost l in a wood of suspicions,
and not knowing whom to trust, had both intelligence2
with the confessors and chaplains of divers great men ;
and for the better credit of his espials abroad with the
contrary side, did use to have them cursed at Paul's
(by name) amongst the bead-roll of the King's ene-
mies, according to the custom of those times. These
spials plied their charge so roundly, as the King had
an anatomy of Perkin alive ; and was likewise well
informed of the particular correspondent conspirators
in England, and many other mysteries were revealed ;
and Sir Robert Clifford in especial won to be assured
to the King, and industrious and officious for his ser-
vice. The King therefore (receiving a rich return of
his diligence, and great satisfaction touching a number
of particulars,) first divulged and spread abroad the
imposture and juggling of Perkin's person and travels,
with the circumstances thereof, throughout the realm ;
not by proclamation (because things were yet in exam-
ination, and so might receive the more or the less,) but
by court-fames, which commonly print better than
printed proclamations. Then thought he it also time
to send an ambassage unto Archduke Philip into Flan-
ders, for the abandoning and dismissing of Perkin.
Herein he employed Sir Edward Poynings, and Sir
William Warham 3 . doctor of the canon law. The
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " being lost."
2 Secreto egisse ut ex iis de consiliis adversariorum suoi*um edoceretur.
8 In Ellis's Letters, 2nd series, vol. i. p. 167., there is a privy seal for
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 219
Archduke was then young and governed by his coun-
sel. Before whom the ambassadors had audience.
And Dr. Warham spake in this manner :
" My lords, the King our master is very sorry, that
England and your country here of Flanders having
been counted as man and wife for so long time, now
this country of all others should be the stage where
a base counterfeit should play the part of a King of
England, not only to his Grace's disquiet and dis-
honour, but to the scorn and reproach of all sover-
eign Princes. To counterfeit the dead image of a
King in his coin is an high offence by all laws. But
to counterfeit the living image of a King in his per-
son exceedeth all falsifications, except it should be
that of a Mahomet or an Antichrist, that counterfeit
divine honour. The King hath too great an opin-
ion of this sage counsel, to think that any of you is
caught with this fable (though way may be given by
you to the passion of some), the thing in itself is so
improbable. To set testimonies aside of the death
of Duke Richard, which the King hath upon record
plain and infallible, (because they may be thought
to be in the King's own power,) let the thing testify
for itself. Sense and reason no power can command.
Is it possible (trow you) that King Richard should
damn his soul and foul his name with so abominable
a murder, and yet not mend his case? Or do you
think that men of blood (that were his instruments)
did turn to pity in the midst of their execution?
whereas in cruel and savage beasts, and men also,1
payment of money to Sir E. Poynings and Sir W. Warham, for their em-
bassy. It is dated the 5th of July (1493); and it appears that they had
not then set out.
1 Inferis ipsis, nee minus in hominibus ferinas natural.
220 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
the first draught of blood doth yet make them more
fierce and enraged. Do you not know that the bloody
executioners of tyrants do go to such errands with
an halter about their neck, so that if they perform
not they are sure to die for it? And do you think
that these men would hazard their own lives for
sparing another's? Admit they should have saved
him ; what should they have done with him ? Turn
him into London streets? that the watchmen, or any
passenger that should light upon him, might carry
him before a justice, and so all come to light ? Or
should they have kept him by them secretly? That
surely would have required a great deal of care,
charge, and continual fears. But, my lords, I labour
too much in a clear business. The King is so wise,
and hath so good friends abroad, as now he knoweth
Duke Perkin from his cradle. And because he is a
great Prince, if you have any good poet here, he can
help him with notes to write his life, and to parallel
him with Lambert Symnell, now the King's falconer.
And therefore, to speak plainly to your lordships, it
is the strangest thing in the world, that the Lady
Margaret (excuse us if we name her, whose malice
to the King is both causeless and endless,) should
now when she is old, at the time when other women
give over child-bearing, bring forth two such monsters,
being not the births of nine or ten months, but of
many years. And whereas other natural mothers
bring forth children weak, and not able to help them-
selves ; she bringeth forth tall stripplings, able soon
after their coming into the world to bid battle to
mighty Kings. My lords, we stay unwillingly upon
this part : we would to God that lady would once
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 221
taste the joys which God Almighty doth serve up
unto her, in beholding her niece to reign in such
honour, and with so much royal issue, which she
might be pleased to account as her own. The King's
request unto the Archduke and your lordships might
be, that according to the example of King Charles,
who hath already discarded him, you would banish
this unworthy fellow out of your dominions. But
because the King may justly expect more from an
ancient confederate than from a new reconciled ene-
my, he maketh it1 his request unto you to deliver
him up into his hands : pirates and impostors of this
sort being fit to be accounted the common enemies of
mankind, and no ways to be protected by the law of
nations."
After some time of deliberation, the ambassadors
received this short answer: That the Archduke, for
the love of King Henry, would in no sort aid or assist
the pretended Duke, but in all things conserve the
amity he had with the King. But for the Duch-
ess Dowager, she was absolute in the lands of her
dowry, and that he could not let her to dispose of
her own.
The King, upon the return of the ambassadors, was
nothing satisfied with this answer : for well he knew
that a patrimonial dowry carried no part of sover-
eignty or command of forces.2 Besides, the ambas-
sadors told him plainly, that they saw the Duchess
had a great party in the Archduke's counsel ; and that
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 omits " it."
2 i. e. none of the prerogatives of sovereignty, such as the command of
forces: as it is more clearly expressed in the translation — nihil quod abso-
luti imperii esset {quale est copiarum administratio) secum transferre.
222 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
howsoever it was carried in a course of connivance,1
yet the Archduke underhand gave aid and further-
ance to Perkin. Wherefore (partly out of courage2
and partly out of policy) the King forthwith banished
all Flemings (as well their persons as their wares)
out of his kingdom ; commanding his subjects likewise
(and by name his Merchants Adventurers) which had
a resiance in Antwerp, to return ; translating the
mart (which commonly followed the English cloth)
unto Calais, and embarred also all further trade for
the future.3 This the King did, being sensible in
point of honour4 not to suffer a pretender to the
crown of England to affront him so near at hand,
and he to keep terms of friendship with the country
where he did set up. But he had also a further
reach ; for that he knew well that the subjects of
Flanders drew so great commodity from the trade of
England, as by this embargo they would soon wax
weary of Perkin ; and that the tumults of Flanders
had been so late and fresh, as it was no time for
the Prince to displease the people. Nevertheless for
form's sake, by way of requital, the Archduke did
1 i. e. howsoever the Archduke pretended only to connive at the enter-
tainment of Perkin. Utcunque Archidux ad res Perkini connivere lantum
simularet.
2 Animum explere cupiens.
8 i. e. all trade between the English and the Flemings. The transla-
tion has cum Burgundis ; by which word Flemings a few lines above is
rendered. It was on the 18th of September, 1493, that the sheriffs were
directed to publish the proclamation forbidding mercantile intercourse (by
importation or exportation without license under the great seal) with the
subjects of the Archduke of Austriche and the Duke of Burgoyne. See
Cal. Pat. Rolls, 9 Hen. VII. p. 80.
4 i. e. feeling himself interested in point of honour. The Latin is a little
fuller: partim ut nihil honori suo indignum fieri permitteret, qui haud parum
perstringi posset si quis ad coronam Anglia prastensoi', &c.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 223
likewise banish the English out of Flanders ; which
in effect was done to his hand.
The King being well advertised that Perkin did
more trust upon friends and partakers within the
realm -than upon foreign arms, thought it behoved
him to apply the remedy where the disease 1 lay, and
to proceed with severity against some of the principal
conspirators here within the realm ; thereby to purge
the ill humours in England, and to cool the hopes in
Flanders. Wherefore he caused to be apprehended,
almost at an instant, John Ratcliffe Lord Fitzwater,
Sir Symon Mountford, Sir Thomas Thwaites, William
Dawbeny, Robert Ratcliffe, Thomas Chressenor, and
Thomas Astwood. All these were arraigned, con-
victed, and condemned for high treason, in adhering
and promising aid to Perkin. Of these the Lord
Fitzwater was conveyed to Calais, and there kept
in hold and in hope of life, until soon after (either
inpatient or betrayed) he dealt with his keeper to
have escaped, and thereupon was beheaded. But
Sir Symon Mountford, Robert Ratcliffe, and William
>awbeny, were beheaded immediately after their con-
demnation. The rest were pardoned, together with
lany others,2 clerks and laics, amongst which were
two Dominican friars, and William Worseley3 Dean
of Paul's ;■ which latter sort 4 passed examination, but
le not to public trial.5
1 Fomes morbi.
2 This is omitted in the translation.
8 William Worsely, Clk., Dean of St. Paul's, London, received his par-
Ion on the 6th of June, 1495. Cal. Pat. Rolls, 10 Hen. VII. p. 57.
4 Clerici autem.
5 Tytler in his History of Scotland (vol. iv. p. 374-5.) supplies a fact,
lot mentioned in any previous history, which is of considerable impor-
mce to the understanding of Henry's position at this juncture, and par-
224 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
The Lord Chamberlain at that time was not
touched ; whether it were that the King would not
stir too many humours at once, but, after the man-
ner of good physicians, purge the head last ; or that
Clifford (from whom most of these discoveries came)
reserved that piece for his own coming over ; x sig-
nifying only to the King in the mean time that he
doubted there were some greater ones in the business,
whereof he would give the King farther account
when he came to his presence.
ticularly of his relations with Scotland. " This discovery," he says,
speaking of the information given by Sir R. Clifford, " was a fatal blow
to the Yorkists. Their project was probably to have proclaimed Perkin
in England, whilst his numerous adherents prepared to rise in Ireland; and
Vie Scottish monarch teas to break at the head of his army across the Borders,
and compel Henry to divide his force. But the Border chiefs, impatient for
war, invaded England too soon ; and it happened, unfortunately for War-
beck, that whilst a tumultuous force, including the Armstrongs, Elwalds,
Crossars, Wighams, Nyksons, and Henrisons, penetrated into Northumberland,
tcith the hope of promoting a rising in favour of the counterfeit Duke of York,
the treachery of Clifford had revealed the whole particulars of the con-
spiracy; and the apprehension and execution of the ringleaders struck
such terror into the nation, that the cause of Perkin in that country was
for the present considered hopeless." " This raid or invasion," adds Mr.
Tytler in a note, " which is unknown to our historians, is mentioned
nowhere but in the record of justiciary, Nov. 1493. Mr. Stirling's MS.
Chron. Notes, p. 55." The total omission from our histories of so consid-
erable a fact as an incursion of this kind at such a conjuncture and during
a truce (especially if Mr. Tytler be right in supposing that it was intended
to be part of a combined movement in concert with Flanders, Ireland, and
the Yorkists in England) shows how ill we can judge of the questions of
state with which Henry had to deal.
It appears from an entry in the Calendar of Patent Rolls, dated 8 March,
8 Hen. VII. [1492-3], that an armed force was then about to be sent into
Ireland under Sir Roger Cotton, "to war with the rebels" (p. 71.); who
seem to have been speedily suppressed, for we find general pardons
granted to several principal persons in Ireland on the 22nd and 30th of
March, the 10th of April, and the 29th of May following. See Cal. Pat.
Rolls, pp. 85. 81, 82. A fact which agrees very well with Tytler's state-
ment.
1 The translation adds ut rem maximi momenti.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 225
Upon Allhallows-day-even, being now the tenth
year of the King's reign, the King's second son Henry
was created Duke of York ; and as well the Duke, as
divers others, noblemen, knights-bachelors, and gentle-
men of" quality, were made Knights of the Bath ac-
cording to the ceremony. Upon the morrow after
Twelfth-day, the King removed from Westminster J
(where he had kept his Christinas) to the Tower of
London. This he did as soon as he had advertisement
that Sir Robert Clifford (in whose bosom or budget
most of Perkin's secrets were laid up) was comen into
England. And the place of the Tower was chosen to
that end, that if Clifford should accuse any of the great
ones, they might without suspicion or noise or sending
abroad of warrants be presently attached ; the court
and prison being within the cincture of one wall.
After a day or two the King drew unto him a selected
counsel, and admitted Clifford to his presence ; who
first fell down at his feet, and in all humble manner
craved the King's pardon ; which the King then
granted,2 though he were indeed secretly assured of his
life before. Then, commanded to tell his knowledge,
he did amongst many others (of himself not interro-
gated) impeach Sir William Stanley, the Lord Cham-
berlain of the King's household.
The King seemed to be much amazed at the nam-
ing of this lord ; as if he had heard the news of some
strange and fearful prodigy. To hear a man that had
done him service of so high a nature as to save his life
1 So Stowe. According to the old Chronicle (Cott. Vitel. A. xvi.) he
kept his Christmas at Greenwich.
2 Sir Robert Clifford received his pardon on the 22nd of December, 1494.
Cal. Pat. Rolls, 10 Hen. VII. p. 33.
VOL. XI. 15
226 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
and set the crown upon his head ; a man that enjoyed
by his favour and advancement so great a fortune both
in honour and riches ; a man that was tied unto him
in so near a band of alliance, his brother having mar-
ried the King's mother ; and lastly a man to whom he
had committed the trust of his person, in making him
his chamberlain : that this man, no ways disgraced, no
ways discontent, no ways put in fear, should be false
unto him. Clifford was required to say over again and
again the particulars of his accusation ; being warned,
that in a matter so unlikely, and that concerned so
great a servant of the King's, he should not in any
wise go too far. But the King finding that he did
sadly and constantly (without hesitation or varying,
and with those civil protestations that were fit,) stand
to that that he had said, offering to justify it upon his
soul and life ; he caused him to be removed. And
after he had not a little bemoaned himself unto his
counsel there present, gave order that Sir William
Stanley should be restrained in his own chamber,
where he lay before, in the square tower. And the
next day he was examined by the lords. Upon his
examination he denied little of that wherewith he was
charged, nor endeavoured much to excuse or extenuate
his fault. So that (not very wisely), thinking to make
his offence less by confession, he made it enough for
condemnation. It was conceived that he trusted much
to his former merits and the interest that his brother
had in the King. But those helps were over-weighed
by divers things that made against him, and were pre-
dominant in the King's nature and mind. First, an
over-merit; for convenient merit, unto which reward
may easily reach, doth best with Kings : Next, the
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 227
sense of his power ; for the King thought that he that
could set him up was the more dangerous to pull him
down : Thirdly, the glimmering of a confiscation ; for
he was the richest subject for value in the kingdom ;
there being found in his castle of Holte forty thousand
marks in ready money and plate, besides jewels, house-
hold-stuff, stocks upon his grounds, and other personal
estate exceeding great; and for his revenue in land
and fee, it was three thousand pounds a year of old
rent,1 a great matter in those times : 2 Lastly, the na-
ture of the time ; for if the King had been out of fear
of his own estate, it was not unlike he would have
spared his life ; but the cloud of so great a rebellion
hanging over his head made him work sure. Where-
fore after some six weeks' distance of time, which the
Aug did honourably interpose, both to give space to
brother's intercession, and to shew to the world
tat he had a conflict with himself what he should
lo, he was arraigned of high-treason, and condemned,
id presently after beheaded.3
It is yet 4 to this day left but in dark memory, both
rhat the case of this noble person was, for which he
fered ; and what likewise was the ground and cause
of his defection and alienation 5 of his heart from the
King. His case was said to be this ; that in discourse
between Sir Robert Clifford and him he had said, That
if he were sure that that young man were King Ed-
1 Antiqui census.
2 Res mira et fere inaudita. The inventory of the money found at Holt
is preserved in the Rolls-house. Chapter-House Records, A. 3. 10. fo. 29.
8 He was arraigned on the 31st of January, and executed on the 16th of
February, 1494-5. (Old Chron.)
* So MS. Ed. 1622 has " Yet is it."
« So MS. Ed. 1622 has " the alienation."
228 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
ward's son, he would never bear arms against him.
This case seems somewhat a hard case, both in respect
of the conditional, and in l respect of the other words.
But for the conditional, it seemeth the judges of that
time (who were learned men, and the three chief of
them of the privy counsel,) thought it was a dangerous
thing to admit Ifs and Ands to qualify words of trea-
son ; whereby every man might express his malice, and
blanch his danger. And it was like to the case (in the
following times) of Elizabeth Barton, the holy maid of
Kent, who had said, That if King Henry the Eighth
did not take Catherine his wife again, he should be de-
prived of his crown, and die the death of a dog. And
infinite cases may be put of like nature ; which it
seemeth the grave judges taking into consideration,
would not admit of treasons upon condition.2 And as
for the positive words, That he would not bear arms
against King Edward's son ; though the words seem
calm, yet it was a plain and direct over-ruling of the
King's title, either by the line of Lancaster or by act
of Parliament ; which no doubt pierced the King more
than if Stanley had charged his lance upon him in the
field. For if Stanley would hold that opinion, That a
son of King Edward had still the better right, he being
so principal a person of authority and favour about the
King, it was to teach all England to say as much.
And therefore, as those times were,3 that speech
touched the quick. But some writers do put this out
of doubt ; for they say that Stanley did expressly prom-
ise to aid Perkin, and sent him some help of treasure.4
i MS. omits "in."
2 Noluewnt prorsus proditionibus cum clausula conditionali patrocinari.
8 Si quis temporum illorum conditionem rite introspiciat.
4 This is the statement of Bernard Andre", as quoted by Speed.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 229
Now for the motive of his falling off from the King.
It is true that at Bos worth-field the King was beset,
and in a manner inclosed round about by the troops
of King Richard, and in manifest danger of his life ;
when this Stanley was sent by his brother with three
thousand men to his rescue, which he performed so,
that King Richard was slain upon the place. So as
the condition of mortal men is not capable of a greater
benefit than the King received by the hands of Stan-
ley; being like the benefit of Christ, at once to save
and crown. For which service the King gave him
great gifts,1 made him his counsellor and chamberlain ;
and (somewhat contrary to his nature) had winked at
the great spoils of Bosworth-field, which came almost
wholly to this man's hands, to his infinite enriching.
Yet nevertheless, blown up with the conceit of his
merit, he did not think he had received good measure
om the King, at least not pressing-down and running
ver, as he expected. And his ambition was so exor-
itant and unbounded, as he became suitor to the King
or the Earldom of Chester : which ever being a kind
f appanage to the principality of Wales, and using to
o to the King's son, his suit did not only end in a
enial but in a distaste : the King perceiving thereby
that his desires were intemperate, and his cogitations
vast and irregular, and that his former benefits were
but cheap and lightly regarded by him. Wherefore
the King began not to brook him well ; 2 and as a little
I leaven of new distaste doth commonly sour the whole
lump of former merits, the king's wit began now to
1 So Polydore Vergil says. In the Latin translation, Bacon substitutes
maximam gratiam habuit.
2 Ei intra animum suum minus f avert.
230 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
suggest unto his passion, that Stanley at Bos worth-
field, though he came time enough to save his life, yet
he stayed long enough to endanger it. But yet having
no matter against him, he continued him in his places
until this his fall.
After him was made Lord Chamberlain Giles Lord
Dawbeny, a man of great sufficiency and valour, the
more1 because he was gentle and moderate.
There was a common opinion, that Sir Robert Clif-
ford (who now was becomen the state-informer) was
from the beginning an emissary and spy of the King's ;
and that he fled over into Flanders with his consent
and privity. But this is not probable ; both because
he never recovered that degree of grace which he had
with the King before his going over ; and chiefly for
that the discovery which he had made touching the
Lord Chamberlain (which was his great service) grew
not from anything he learned abroad, for that he knew
it well before he went.
These executions, and specially that of the Lord
Chamberlain which was the chief strength of the
party, and by means of Sir Robert Clifford who was
the most inward man of trust amongst them, did ex-
tremely quail the design of Perkin and his complices,
as well through discouragement as distrust. So that
they were now like sand without lime ; ill bound to-
gether ; especially as many as were English, who were
at a gaze, looking strange one upon another, not know-
ing who was faithful to their side ; but thinking that
the King (what with his baits and what with his nets)
would draw them all unto him that were any thing
1 t. e. qualities which were of the greater value because &c. Quce vir~
tutes magis in eo enituerunt quod, &c.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VU. 231
worth. And indeed it came to pass that divers came
aw.-iv by the thrid, sometimes one and sometimes an-
other. Barley,1 that was joint-commissioner with Clif-
ford, did hold out one of the longest, till Perkin was
far worn ; yet made his peace at length.2 But the fall
of this great man, being in so high authority and fa-
vour (as was thought) with the King, and the manner
of carriage of the business, as if3 there had been secret
inquisition upon him for a great time before ; and the
cause for which he suffered, which was little more than
for saying in effect that the title of York was better
than the title of Lancaster, which was the case almost
of every man, at the least in opinion ; was matter of
great terror amongst all the King's servants and sub-
jects ; insomuch as no man almost thought himself se-
cure, and men durst scarce commune or talk one with
another, but there was a general diffidence everywhere ;
which nevertheless made the King; rather more absolute
than more safe.4 For bleeding inwards and shut va-
pours strangle soonest and oppress most.
Hereupon presently came forth swarms and vollies
of libels (which are the gusts of liberty of speech re-
strained, and the females of sedition,) containing bitter
invectives and slanders against the King and some of
the counsel : for the contriving and dispersing whereof
(after great diligence of enquiry) five mean persons
I were caught up and executed.
Meanwhile the King did not neglect Ireland, being
1 " William Barlee, alias Barley, of Aldebury (Herts), Esquire," received
his pardon on 12 July, 1498. See Cal. Pat. Rolls, 13 Hen. VII. p. 39.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has M at the length."
8 The Latin puts it more strongly. Uncle liquido palebat.
4 In the translation he says more absolute but less safe. Ex quo factum
est ut rex magis absoluto certe, sed minus tuto, imperio frueretur.
232 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
the soil where these mushrooms and upstart weeds that
spring up in a night did chiefly prosper. He sent
therefore from hence (for the better settling of his
affairs there) commissioners of both robes,1 the Prior
of Lanthony2 to be his Chancellor in that kingdom,
1 Sir Edward Poynings (or Ponynges), and " Henry, Prior of Langtony
and Bishop elect of Bangor " received their commissions, — the one as
" Deputy of Ireland, with power to act as Lieutenant in the absence of
Henry, second son of the King; '• the other as Chancellor, — on the 13th
of September, 1494. See Cal. Pat. Rolls, 10 Hen. VII. p. 81. 36. On the
same day, Sir Robert Poyntz was commissioned " to superintend the mus-
ter of the King's troops destined for Ireland, and to ship them in certain
vessels at Bristol thereto appointed." Id. ibid. p. 81.
1 suspect that Bacon's description of Sir Edward Poynings's commis-
sion, which does not agree exactly with the description in the Calendar of
Patent Rolls, was drawn from the tenor of the previous commission to
James Ormond and Thomas Garth, 6th December, 1491. See note 3, p.
206. At that time the Duke of Bedford was Lieutenant of Ireland ; who
was Deputy in his absence I do not know; but on the 11th of June, 1492,
Walter Archbishop of Dublin was appointed to that office. See Cal. Pat.
Rolls.
The statement that the Earl of Kildare was Deputy when Poynings was
sent over, that he was apprehended, sent to England, cleared himself, and
was replaced, comes from Polydore Vergil: whose dates are not much to
be relied upon. It is true however that the Earl was attainted by Poin-
ings's Parliament, 1 Dec. 1494, and that the attainder was reversed by
Parliament in England in October, 1495. See Stat, of Realm, vol. ii. p.
612. The entries in the Calendar of Patent Rolls would lead one to sus-
pect that Sir Edward Poynings discharged the office of Deputy till the
end of 1495; that he was then succeeded (provisionally perhaps) by the
Prior of Lanthony, who was still Chancellor, and whose appointment as
" Deputy and Justice of Ireland, during the absence of Henry, the King's
son," &c. is dated 1 Jan. 1495-6 (see Cal. Pat. Rolls, 11 Hen. VII. p. 25);
that he continued to discharge both offices till the 6th August, 1496, when
he was succeeded as Chancellor by Walter Archbishop of Dublin, and as
Deputy by Gerald Fitz Moryce, Earl of Kildare, to whom that office, with
the same privileges, &c. as Sir Edward Poynings had enjoyed in the same,
was then granted for ten years, and afterwards during pleasure. See Cal.
Pat. Rolls, 11 Hen. VII. pt. 1. p. 25. and pt. 2. pp. 15. 18. It may be
worth mentioning that Gerald Earl of Kildare had previously received a
general pardon on the 30th of March, 1493. Cal. Pat. Rolls, 8 Hen. VII.
p. 81.
2 Henry Dene, now bishop elect of Bangor; translated to Salisbury in
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
233
and Sir Edward Poynings, with a power of men, and
a marshall commission, together with a civil power of
his Lieutenant,1 with a clause, That the Earl of Kil-
dare, then Deputy, should obey him. But the wild
Irish, ^who were the principal offenders, fled into the
woods and bogs, after their manner ; and those that
knew themselves guilty in the pale fled to them. So
that Sir Edward Poynings was enforced to make a
wild chase upon the wild Irish ; where (in respect
of the mountains and fastnesses) he did little good :
which (either out of a suspicious melancholy upon his
bad success, or the better to save his service from dis-
grace,) he would needs impute unto the comfort that
the rebels should receive underhand from the Earl of
Kildare ; every light suspicion growing upon the Earl,
in respect of the Kildare that was in the action of
Lambert Symnell, and slain at Stokefield. Wherefore
he caused the Earl to be apprehended, and sent into
England ; where upon examination he cleared himself
so well as he was replaced in his government. But
Poynings, the better to make compensation of the
meagreness of his service in the wars by acts of peace,
called a Parliament ; where was made that memorable
act which at this day is called Poynings' Law ; where-
bv all the statutes of England were made to be of force
in Ireland. For before they were not ; neither are
any now in force in Ireland, which were made in Eng-
land since that time ; which was the tenth year of the
King.
1500; and to Canterbury in August, 1501, upon the death of Cardinal
Morton. Died 16 Feb. 1502-3. See old Chron. 204. b.
1 Atque una diploma dedit auctoritatem in eum conferens locumtenentis sui
in reyimine civili. This is not expressly stated by Polydore, though his
narrative seems to imply as much.
234 HISTORY OF KING HENKY VII.
About this time began to be discovered in the King
that disposition, which afterwards nourished and whet
on by bad counsellors and ministers proved the blot of
his times : which was the course he took to crush
treasure out of his subjects' purses, by forfeitures upon
penal laws. At this men did startle the more (at this
time), because it appeared plainly to be in the King's
nature, and not out of his necessity ; he being now
in float for treasure: for that he had newly received
the peace-money from France, the benevolence-money
from his subjects, and great casualties upon the con-
fiscations of the Lord Chamberlain and divers others.
The first noted case of this kind was that of Sir Wil-
liam Capel,1 Alderman of London ; who upon sundry
penal laws was condemned in the sum of seven and
twenty hundred pounds, and compounded with the
King for sixteen hundred : and yet after, Empson
would have cut another chop out of him, if the King
had not died in the instant.
The summer following,2 the King, to comfort his
mother, whom he did always tenderly love and revere,
and to make demonstration 3 to the world that the pro-
ceeding against Sir William Stanley (which was im-
posed upon him by necessity of state) had not in any
i This fact is recorded by Stowe; without any remark. And it is worth
observing that the predominance of avarice in Henry's character (which
has since become almost proverbial, and to which our modern historians
refer almost every action of his life,) had not been noticed by any historian
before Bacon, except Speed; and he professes to have derived the obser-
vation from Bacon himself. This case occurred in May, 1495. See old
Chron. Sir William Capell received a pardon on the 7th Nov. following.
See Cal. Pat. Rolls, 11 Hen. VII. p. 19.
2 i. e. the summer of 1495 : the 25th of June, according to Polydore.
8 The MS. and the Ed. 1622 both have "to make open demonstration."
Iu the list " faults escaped," at the end of the volume, " open " is directed
to be omitted.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 235
degree diminished the affection he bore to Thomas his
brother, went in progress to Latham, to make merry
with his mother and the Earl, and lay there divers
days. i
During this progress Perkin Warbeck, rinding that
time and temporising, which while his practices were
covert and wrought well in England made for him, did
now when they were discovered and defeated rather
make against him (for that when matters once go
down the hill they stay not without a new force), re-
solved to try his adventure in some exploit upon Eng-
land ; hoping still upon the affections of the common
people towards the House of York. Which body of
common people he thought was not to be practised
upon as persons of quality are ; but that the only prac-
tice upon their affections was to set up a standard in
the field. The place where he should make his at-
tempt he chose to be the coast of Kent.
The King by this time was grown to such a height
of reputation for cunning and policy, that every acci-
dent and event that went well was laid and imputed to
his foresight, as if he had set it before. As in this
particular of Perkin's design upon Kent. For the
world would not believe afterwards, but the King, hav-
ing secret intelligence of Perkin's intention for Kent,
the better to draw it on, went of purpose into the
north afar off; laying an open side unto Perkin to
make him come to the close, and so to trip up his
heels, having made sure in Kent beforehand.
But so it was, that Perkin had gathered together a
power of all nations,1 neither in number nor in the
hardiness and courage of the persons contemptible ;
1 Colluviem quondam.
236 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
but in their nature and fortunes to be feared as well of
friends as enemies ; being bankrupts, and many of
them felons, and such as lived by rapine. These he
put to sea, and arrived upon the coast of Sandwich
and Deal in Kent about July.1
There he cast anchor, and to prove the affections of
the people, sent some of his men to land, making great
boasts of the power that was to follow. The Kentish
men, perceiving that Perkin was not followed by any
English of name or account, and that his forces con-
sisted but of strangers born, and most of them base
people and free-booters, fitter to spoil a coast than to
recover a kingdom ; resorting unto the principal gen-
tlemen of the country, professed their loyalty to the
King, and desired to be directed and commanded for
the best of the King's service. The gentlemen, enter-
ing into consultation, directed some forces in good
number to shew themselves upon the coast, and some
of them to make signs to entice Perkin 's soldiers to
land, as if they would join with them ; and some
others to appear from some other places, and to make
semblance as if they fled from them, the better to en-
courage them to land. But Perkin, who by playing
the Prince, or else taught by secretary Frion, had
learned thus much, that people under command do use
to consult and after to march on in order,2 and rebels
contrariwise run upon an head together in confusion ;
considering the delay of time, and observing their or-
derly and not tumultuary arming, doubted the worst.
And therefore the wily youth would not set one foot
1 On the 3rd of July, 1495; according to the old Chronicle, p. 154. b.
2 Primo stare et postea ordine incedere. Ed. 1622 has " to march in
order."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 237
out of his ship, till he might see things were sure.
Wherefore the King's forces, perceiving that they
could draw on no more than those that were formerly
landed, set upon them and cut them in pieces ere they
could fly back to their ships. In which skirmish (be-
sides those that fled and were slain) there were taken
about an hundred and fifty persons, which, for that the
King thought, that to punish a few for example was
gentleman's pay, but for rascal people they were to be
cut off every man, especially in the beginning of an
enterprise ; and likewise for that he saw that Perkin's
forces would now consist chiefly of such rabble and
scum of desperate people ; * he therefore 2 hanged them
all for the greater terror. They were brought to Lon-
don all railed in ropes, like a team of horses in a cart,
and were executed some of them at London and Wap-
ping, and the rest at divers places upon the sea-coast
of Kent, Sussex, and Norfolk ; for sea-marks or light-
houses to teach Perkin's people to avoid the coast.
The King being advertised of the landing of the rebels,
thought to leave his progress : but being certified the
next day that they were partly defeated and partly
fled, he continued his progress, and sent Sir Richard
Guildford into Kent in message ; who calling the coun-
try together, did much commend (from the King)
their fidelity, manhood, and well handling of that
I service ; and gave them all thanks, and in private
promised reward to some particulars.
Upon the sixteenth of November (this being the
eleventh year of the King) was holden the Serjeants'
1 Simulque animo prospiciens copias Perkini posthac ex cottuvie et sentind
hominum prqjectoi'um compositas fore.
a So Ed. 1622. The MS. omits " he therefore."
238 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
feast at Ely Place, there being nine Serjeants of that
call. The King, to honour the feast, was present with
his Queen at the dinner ; being a Prince that was ever
ready to grace and countenance the professors of the
law ; having a little of that, that as he governed his
subjects by his J laws, so he governed his laws by his
lawyers.
This year also the King entered into league with
the Italian potentates for the defence of Italy against
France. For King Charles had conquered the realm
of Naples, and lost it again, in a kind of felicity of a
dream. He passed the whole length of Italy without
resistance ; so that it was true which Pope Alexander
was wont to say, That the Frenchmen came into Italy
with chalk in their hands to mark up their lodgings,
rather than with swords to fight. He likewise entered
and won in effect the whole kingdom of Naples itself,
without striking stroke. But presently thereupon he
did commit and multiply so many errors, as was too
great a task for the best fortune to overcome. He
gave no contentment to the barons of Naples, of the
faction of the Angeovines ; but scattered his rewards
according to the mercenary appetites of some about
him : He put all Italy upon their guard, by the seiz-
ing and holding of Ostia, and the protecting of the
liberty of Pisa ; which made all men suspect that his
purposes looked further than his title of Naples : He
fell too soon at difference with Ludovico Sfortza, who
was the man that carried the keys which brought him
in and shut him out : He neglected to extinguish some
relicks of the war : And lastly, in regard of his easy
passage through Italy without resistance, he entered
1 So Ed. 1622. The MS. omits "his."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 239
into an overmuch despising of the arms of the Italians,
whereby lie left the realm of Naples at his departure
so much the less provided. So that not long after his
return, the whole kingdom revolted to Ferdinando the
younger, and the French were quite driven out. Nev-
ertheless Charles did make both great threats and
great preparations to re-enter Italy once again : where-
fore at the instance of divers of the states of Italy (and
especially of Pope Alexander) there was a league con-
cluded between the said Pope, Maximilian King of
the Romans, Henry King of England, Ferdinando and
Isabella King and Queen of Spain (for so they are
constantly placed in the original treaty throughout),
.ugustino Barbadico Duke of Venice, and Ludovico
>fortza Duke of Milan, for the common defence of
ieir estates : wherein though Ferdinando of Naples
ras not named as principal, yet no doubt the king-
>m of Naples was tacitly included ! as a fee of the
turch.
There died also this year Cecile Duchess of York,
tother to King Edward the Fourth, at her castle of
►arkhamsted, being of extreme years, and who had
ived to see three princes of her body crowned, and
Pour murdered. She was buried at Foderingham, by
her husband.
This year also the King called his Parliament,2
where many laws were made of a more private and
vulgar nature than ought to detain the reader of an
history. And it may be justly suspected, by the pro-
1 Tacitly is omitted in the translation. The original league (without
Henry) was signed 25 March, 1495. It was ratified by Henry on the 13th
of September, 1496.
2 It met on the 14th of October, 1495.
240 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
ceedings following, that as the King did excell in good
commonwealth laws, so nevertheless he had in secret a
design to make use of them as well for collecting of
treasure as for correcting of manners ; and so mean-
ing thereby to harrow his people, did accumulate
them the rather.
The principal law that was made this Parliament
was a law of a strange nature, rather just than legal,1
and more magnanimous than provident. This law did
ordain, That no person that did assist in arms or other-
wise the King for the time being, should after be im-
peached therefore, or attainted either by the course of
law 2 or by act of Parliament ; but if any such act of
attainder did hap 3 to be made, it should be void and
of none effect ; for that it was agreeable to reason of
estate that the subject should not inquire of the just-
ness of the King's title or quarrel, and it was agreeable
to good conscience that (whatsoever the fortune of the
war were) the subject should not suffer for his obedi-
ence. The spirit of this law was wonderful pious and
noble, being like, in matter of war, unto the spirit of
David in matter of plague ; who said, If I have sinned
strike me, but what have these sheep done ? Neither
wanted this law parts of prudent and deep foresight.
For it did the better take away occasion for the people
to busy themselves to pry into the King's title ; for that
(howsoever it fell) their safety was already provided
for. Besides it could not but greatly draw unto him
the love and hearts of the people, because he seemed
1 Jusla potius secundum cequitatem naturalem quarn ex noi-md juris. The
act was the 11 H. 7. c. 1.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has "the law."
8 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " happen."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 241
more careful for them than for himself. But yet nev-
ertheless it did take off from his party that great tie
and spur of necessity to fight and go victors out of the
field ; considering their lives and fortunes were put in
safety .and protected whether they stood to it or ran
away. But the force and obligation of this law was
in itself illusory, as to the latter part of it ; (by a pre-
cedent act of Parliament to bind or frustrate a future).
For a supreme and absolute power cannot conclude
itself, neither can that which is in nature revocable be
made fixed ; no more than if a man should appoint or
declare by his will that if he made any later will it
should be void. And for the case of the act of Parlia-
ment, there is a notable precedent of it in King Henry
the Eighth's time ; who doubting he might die in the
minority of his son, procured an act to pass, That no
statute made during the minority of a King should
bind him or his successors, except it were confirmed
by the King under his great seal at his full age. But
the first act that passed in King Edward the Sixth's
time, was an act of repeal of that former act ; at
which time nevertheless the King was minor. But
things that do not bind may satisfy for the time.
There was also made a shoaring or underpropping
act for the benevolence : * to make the sums which
any person had agreed to pay, and nevertheless were
not brought in, to be leviable by course of law.
Which act did not only bring in the arrears, but did
I indeed countenance the whole business, and was pre-
tended to be made at the desire of those that had been
forward to pay.
VOL. XI.
i 11 H. 7. c. 10.
16
242 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
gave the attaint upon a false verdict between party and
party,1 which before was a kind of evangile, irremedi-
able. It extends not to causes capital, as well because
they are for the most part at the King's suit ; as be-
cause in them, if they be followed in course of indict-
ment,2 there passeth a double jury, the indictors and
the triers, and so not twelve men but four and twenty.
But it seemeth that was not the only reason ; for this
reason holdeth not in the appeal.3 But the great rea-
son was, lest it should tend to the discouragement of
jurors in cases of life and death, if they should be
subject to suit and penalty, where the favour of life
maketh against them. It extendeth not also to any
suit where the demand is under the value of forty
pounds ; for that in such cases of petty value it would
not quit the charge to go about again.4
There was another law made against a branch of in-
gratitude in women, who having been advanced 5 by
their husbands, or their husbands' ancestors, should
alien and thereby seek to defeat the heirs or those
in remainder of the lands whereunto they had been so
advanced. The remedy was by giving power to the
next to enter for a forfeiture.6
There was also enacted that charitable law for the
admission of poor suitors in forma pauperis, without
1 Quce breve de attincta vocalum introduxit ; per quod judicia juratorum
(qua} veredicto, vocantur) falsa rescindi possint. 11 H. 7. c. 21.
2 Si per viam indictamenti, quod regis nomine semper proctdit, trac-
ienlur.
3 TJbi causa capitalis a parte gravata peragitur.
4 Superaturai essent impensm summam principalem si rctractarentur. The
entire sum at issue would not pay the expense of the process.
5} e. received lands : ad terras promotas.
6 In terrarum possessionem, nomine forisfacturai, non expectata mortc mu-
lieris, continuo venire. 11 H. 7. c. 20.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 243
fee to counsellor, attorney, or clerk ; whereby poor
men became rather able to vex than unable to sue.1
There were divers other good laws made that Parlia-
ment, as we said before ; but we still observe our
manner in selecting out those that are not of a vul-
gar nature.
The King this while though he sat in Parliament as
in full peace, and seemed to account of the designs of
Perkin (who was now returned into Flanders) but as
of a May-game ; 2 yet having the composition of a
wise King, stout without and apprehensive within,
had given order for the watching of beacons upon the
coast, and erecting more where they stood too thin ;
and had a careful eye where this wandering cloud
would break. But Perkin, advised to keep his fire
(which hitherto burned as it were upon green wood)
alive with continual blowing, sailed again into Ire-
land ; 3 whence he had formerly departed, rather upon
the hopes of France than upon any unreadiness or
discouragement he found in that people. But in the
space of time between, the King's diligence and Poyn-
ing's commission had so settled things there, as there
1 JJnde tamen factum est ut homines egeni, sicut lege experiri melius possent,
ad alios vexandos promptiores essent. The meaning is, that the charity of
the legislature thought it better that the poor man should be able to vex
than that he should not be able to sue. — This was 11 H. 7. c. 12.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " but as a May-game."
8 Probably soon after the failure of his descent upon Kent. For we
hear of a royal fleet under the command of Sir Roger Cotton destined for
Ireland on the 26th of July, 1495 (Cal. Pat. Rolls, 10 Hen. VII. p. 97.);
and on the 26th of November following, license was granted to the owner
of a ship which had been seized and despoiled at Toughal by the rebel
Peter Warbeck, to seize or detain any ship or goods, &c. (Id. 11 Hen.
VII. p. 18. A.) A letter from Yarmouth, in the Paston Correspondence
(v. p. 431.), dated 'Relyk Sonday ' [12 July, 1495], says " as for the ships
with the King's rebellers they be forth out of Cambyr westwards.''y
244 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
was nothing left for Perkin but the blustering affection
of the wild1 and naked people. Wherefore he was
advised by his counsel to seek aid of the King of
Scotland ; a Prince young and valorous, and in good
terms with his nobles and people, and ill affected to
King Henry. At this time also both Maximilian and
Charles of France began to bear no good will to the
King: the one being displeased with the King's pro-
hibition of commerce with Flanders ; the other hold-
ing the King for suspect, in regard of his late entry
into league with the Italians. Wherefore besides the
open aids of the Duchess of Burgundy, which did
with sails and oars put on and advance Perkin's de-
signs, there wanted not some secret tides from Maxi-
milian and Charles which did further his fortunes ;
insomuch as they both by their secret letters and mes-
sages recommended him to the King of Scotland.
Perkin therefore coming into Scotland2 upon those
hopes, with a well-appointed company, was by the
King of Scots (being formerly well prepared) hon-
ourably welcomed ; and soon after his arrival admitted
to his presence in a solemn manner. For the King
received him in state in his chamber of presence,
accompanied with divers of his nobles. And Perkin,
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has "of wild."
2 He arrived in Stirling on the 20th of November, 1495. But the King
of Scotland had been prepared to receive him more than a year before.
See the entry in the Treasurer's books, Nov. 6, 1494, quoted by Tytler.
" Items for carriage of the arras work forth of Edinburgh to Stirling, for
receiving the Prince of England, xxx. sft." This may have been the occa-
sion of the busy deliberations in the English Council mentioned in one of
the Paston letters, dated Allhallowtide, 1494. " Sir, there hath been so
great counsel for the King's matters that my Lord Chancellor kept not the
Star Chamber this eight days, but one day at London, on St. Leonard's
day." Vol. v. p. 423.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 245
well attended as well with those that the King had sent
before him as with his own train, entered the room
where the King was, and coming near to the King,
and bowing a little to embrace him, he retired some
paces ^ack, and with a loud voice, that all that were
present might hear him, made his declaration in this
manner : *
" High and mighty King ; your Grace and these
your nobles here present may be pleased benignly to
bow your ears to hear the tragedy of a young man,
that by right ought to hold in his hand the ball of a
kingdom, but by fortune is made himself a ball, tossed
from misery to misery, and from place to place. You
see here before you the spectacle of a Plantagenet,
who hath been carried from the nursery to the sanctu-
1 It is not to be supposed that there is any authentic report of Perkin's
speech to the Scotch King, except for the general tenor and effect of it.
The speech which is given here is taken almost entirely from Speed; who
seems to have made it up partly from Perkin's Proclamation (to be men-
tioned presently) and partly from the narrative of John Leslie Bishop of
Rosse ; with a touch here and there taken from Polydore Vergil. Speed
gives it in the third person, as the substance of what Perkin said. Bacon
retains all that is in Speed, almost word for word; interweaving here and
there a sentence or two, apparently of his own, by way of introduction or
transition ; or to fill up an apparent gap in the argument. The three first
sentences, and those in which Perkin is made to touch upon the manner of
his escape from the Tower, may be taken as specimens of the matter added.
I have not thought it worth while to point out each expression which
varies from previously recorded versions of the speech. It is enough to
say that no statement or material modification of any fact has been intro-
duced by Bacon without the authority (such as it is) of preceding histo-
rians. In point of form and expression there is no version of it which
has any claim to be taken for authentic. Such things, unless taken down
by a short-hand writer, must always be in great part the composition of
the narrator; as any one may satisfy himself by trying to write out a
continuous narrative of the last conversation, or a continuous report of the
last speech, that was uttered in his presence : and if the version of the
speech which is here given contains Bacon's guesses, instead of Polydore's
or Leslie's or Speed's, it is not the less likely on that account to represent
truly the effect of what Perkin said.
246 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
ary, from the sanctuary to the direful prison, from the
prison to the hand of the cruel tormentor, and from
that hand to the wide wilderness (as I may truly call
it), for so the world hath been to me. So that he that
is born to a great kingdom, hath not ground to set his
foot upon, more than this where he now standeth by
your princely favour. Edward the Fourth, late King
of England, (as your Grace cannot but have heard,)
left two sons, Edward and Richard Duke of York,
both very young. Edward the eldest succeeded their
father in the crown, by the name of King Edward the
Fifth. But Richard Duke of Glocester, their unnat-
ural uncle, first thirsting after the kingdom through
ambition, and afterwards thirsting for their blood out
of desire to secure himself, employed an instrument of
his (confident to him as he thought,) to murder them
both. But this man that was employed to execute
that execrable tragedy, having cruelly slain King Ed-
ward, the eldest of the two, was moved partly by
remorse, and partly by some other mean, to save
Richard his brother ; making a report nevertheless
to the tyrant that he had performed his command-
ment for both brethren. This report was accordingly
believed,1 and published generally. So that the world
hath been possessed of an opinion that they both were
barbarously made away, though ever truth hath some
sparks that fly abroad until it appear in due time, as
this hath had. But Almighty God, that stopped the
mouth of the lions,2 and saved little Joas from the
tyranny of Athaliah when she massacred the King's
1 Believed, that is, by Richard. Isti relatloni a tyranno fides adhibita est,
eademque publicis deelaralionibus est confirmata.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " lion."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 247
children, and did save Isaac when the hand was
Stretched forth to sacrifice him, preserved the second
brother. For I myself that stand here in your pres-
ence, am that very Richard Duke of York, brother
of thai unfortunate Prince King Edward the Fifth,
now the most rightful surviving heir-male to that vic-
torious and most noble Edward, of that name the
Fourth, late King of England. For the manner of
my escape, it is fit it should pass in silence, or at least
in a more secret relation ; for that it may concern
some alive, and the memory of some that are dead.
Let it suffice to think, that I had then a mother living,
a Queen, and one that expected daily such a com-
mandment from the tyrant for the murdering of her
children. Thus in my tender age escaping by God's
mercy out of London, I was secretly conveyed over
sea ; where after a time the party that had me in
charge (upon what new fears, change of mind, or
practice, God knoweth) suddenly forsook me ; where-
by I was forced to wander abroad, and to seek mean
conditions for the sustaining of my life. Wherefore
distracted between several passions, the one of fear
to be known, lest the tyrant should have a new at-
tempt upon me, the other of grief and disdain to be
unknown and to live in that base and servile manner
that I did, I resolved with myself to expect the ty-
rant's death, and then to put myself into my sister's
hands, who was next heir to the crown. But in this
season it happened one Henry Tidder,1 son to Edmund
1 So spelt throughout Perkin's original proclamation; and in the MS.
and original edition of this work.
The sentences which follow, down to the words " if I had been such a
feigned person," are taken almost verbatim from Speed, by whom they
were copied almost verbatim from the first paragraph of Perkin's procla-
248 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Tidder Earl of Richmond, to come from France and
enter into the realm, and by subtile and foul means to
obtain the crown of the same, which to me rightfully
appertained : so that it was but a change from tyrant
to tyrant. This Henry, my extreme and mortal en-
emy, so soon as he had knowledge of my being alive,
imagined and wrought all the subtile ways and means
he could to procure my final destruction. For my
mortal enemy hath not only falsely surmised me to be
a feigned person, giving me nick-names so abusing the
world ; but also to defer and put me from entry into
England, hath offered large sums of money to corrupt
the Princes and their ministers with whom I have
been retained ; and made importune labours to certain
servants about my person to murder or poison me,1
and others to forsake and leave my righteous quarrel
and to depart from my service ; as Sir Robert Clifford
and others. So that every man of reason may well
perceive, that Henry, calling himself King of England,
needed not to have bestowed such great sums of treas-
ure, nor so to have busied himself with importune and
incessant labour and industry, to compass my death
and ruin, if I had been such a feigned person. But
the truth of my cause being so manifest, moved the
most Christian King Charles, and the Lady Duchess
Dowager of Burgundy, my most dear aunt, not only
to acknowledge the truth thereof, but lovingly to assist
mation. The discrepancies between Speed's extract and the original
(presuming that the copy of the original which has been preserved is
correct) seem to have arisen from the difficulty of decyphering it.
The remainder of the speech is also taken — with no more change than
the turning it from the third person into the first, and the insertion of a
transitional sentence — from Speed; who took it from Bishop Leslie.
1 So Speed. The MS. copy has " some of them to murdere our psone,
us (sic) and other to forsack," &c.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 249
me. But it seemeth that God above, for the good of
this whole island, and the knitting of these two king-
doms of England and Scotland in a strait concord and
amity by so great an obligation, hath reserved the
placing^ of me in the imperial throne of England for
the arms and succours of your Grace. Neither is it
the first time that a King of Scotland hath supported
them that were reft * and spoiled of the kingdom of
England, as of late in fresh memory it was done in
the person of Henry the Sixth. Wherefore for that
your Grace hath given clear signs that you are in no
noble quality inferior to your royal ancestors, I, so
distressed a Prince, was hereby moved to come and
put myself into your royal hands ; desiring your as-
sistance to recover my kingdom of England, promising
faithfully to bear myself towards your Grace no other-
ise than if I were your own natural brother; and
pll, upon the recovery of mine inheritance, grate-
illy do to you 2 all the pleasure that is in my utmost
»wer."
After Perkin had told his tale, King James an-
swered bravely and wisely, That whosoever he were,
te should not repent him of putting himself into his
lands. And from that time forth (though there
ranted not some about him that would have persuaded
lim that all was but an illusion) yet notwithstanding,
jther taken by Perkin's amiable and alluring behav-
iour, or inclining to the recommendation of the great
*rinces abroad, or willing to take an occasion of a war
against King Henry, he entertained him in all things
as became the person of Richard Duke of York, em-
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " bereft."
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " do you."
250 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
braced his quarrel, and, the more to put it out of doubt
that he took him to be a great Prince and not a repre-
sentation only, he gave consent that this Duke should
take to wife the Lady Katheren Gordon daughter to
the Earl of Huntley, being a near kinswoman to the
King himself, and a young virgin of excellent beauty
and virtue.
Not long after,1 the King of Scots in person, with
Perkin in his company, entered with a great army
(though it consisted chiefly of borderers being raised
somewhat suddenly) into Northumberland. And Per-
kin, for a perfume before him as he went, caused to be
published a proclamation of this tenor following,2 in
1 All Bacon's authorities represented this predatory incursion of the
Scotch as following close upon Perkin's arrival. And Fabyan, whose
authority is good for dates, says that the Scotch King made sharp war
upon the marches in the eleventh year; that is 1495-6. I find also in the
Calendar of Patent Rolls several commissions for warlike preparations
dated during that year: on the 18th of November, 1495, a commission of
array for Yorkshire: on the 16th of March, 1495-6, a commission to im-
press carpenters, masons, &c. for the King's works on the northern parts
and the marches towards Scotland: on the 23rd of April, commissions of
muster and array for Sussex, Kent, Worcestershire, Lincolnshire, the
cinque ports, Surrey, Hants, Derbyshire, and Staffordshire. (See Cal. Pat.
Rolls, 11 Hen. VII. pp. 49. 51. 29-33.) It is probable therefore that some
predatory incursions did take place soon after Perkin's arrival in Scotland.
The principal invasion however of which Bacon proceeds to speak does
not appear to have been made for ten months or more after. See Ellis's
Letters, 1st ser. vol. i. pp. 23. 32. ; and Tytler's Extracts from the Treas-
urer's Books.
The author of the Pictorial History of England puts it still later. He
says that James did not cross the borders till the beginning of the winter
of 1496, though he had been expected to do so as early as the middle of
September. But he does not quote his authority. In the Calendar of
Patent Rolls there are several commissions for the conveyance of various
warlike stores towards Scotland dated in September, November, January,
and February, 1496-7. And these were no doubt the preparations against
the " great army" which the Scotch King led across the borders in person.
2 Of this tenor; not in these words. This proclamation stands on a dif-
ferent footing from the speech in the last page; and I have therefore
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 251
the name of Richard Duke of York, true inheritor
of the crown of England :
" It hath pleased God, who putteth The original of
•, , . , n , , this proclamation
down the mighty irom their seat, and ex- remaineth with sir
alteth the humble, and suffereth not the worthy preserver
, n , . , . , , and treasurer of
IlOpeS Ot tlie JUSt tO perish in the end, tO rare antiquities:
.. , .. .. from whose manu-
give us means at the length to show our- scripts i have had
°. , Tii „ much light for the
selves armed unto our lieges and people of furnishing of thus
England. But far be it from us to intend
treated it differently. Of this there is extant a literal copy; not indeed
the original copy of which Bacon speaks as then remaining with Sir Rob-
ert Cotton; but a transcript in a well-known hand, with the following
note prefixed by the transcriber himself. " The original of this, in old
written hand, is in the hands of Sir Robert Cotton, the 18 of August,
1616." That original (which, to judge by the many confused and scarcely
intelligible passages that occur in the copy, was probably either very in-
correct or very hard to read) is not now to be found: but the transcript
may be seen among the Harleian MSS. No. 283. fo. 123. b.
Bacon's manner of treating it is peculiar, and (for modern readers at
^ast) requires explanation. It seems that he had read the original and
smembered its tenor, but had no copy within reach from which he could
mote the words. Speed however had printed some extracts from it; and
these he has quoted almost verbatim, — with only the occasional sub-
itution of a familiar for an obsolete word. Of the rest he has given, not
transcript, but a representation ; the sort of representation which a clear-
leaded reporter will give of a confused message, or a judge of the evi-
mce of a blundering witness. The spirit and effect he has preserved
lithfully; but he has omitted repetitions, changed the order, marked the
insitions, and in some cases inserted a sentence or two to make the
leaning clearer or more forcible.
Now if he had treated the extracts which he found in Speed in the same
ray as the rest, one could only have supposed that he had done it in obe-
ience to some law of historical composition, — because a literal transcript
such a thing could not have been introduced into his work with a good
feet. But since this is not so; since he has made so very little alteration
those portions of which he certainly had an exact copy at hand, and so
;ry much in all the rest; the only natural inference is that though he
id read the original and remembered well enough its general character
id purport, he had no copy of the words within reach, and either had
)t the means or did not think it worth while to procure one.
I have pointed out in the foot-notes the principal passages in which
lacon's representation varies from the real proclamation ; and a copy of
le proclamation itself will be found in the appendix.
252 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
their hurt or damage, or to make war upon them,
otherwise than to deliver ourself and them from tyr-
anny and oppression. For our mortal enemy Henry
Tidder, a false usurper of the crown of England which
to us by natural and lineal right appertaineth, knowing
in his own heart our undoubted right, (we being the
very Richard Duke of York, younger son and now
surviving heir-male of the noble and victorious Ed-
ward the Fourth, late King of England), hath not
only deprived us of our kingdom, but likewise by all
foul and wicked means sought to betray us and be-
reave us of our life. Yet if his tyranny only extended
itself to our person, (although our royal blood teacheth
us to be sensible of injuries,) it should be less to our
grief. But this Tidder, who boasteth himself to have
overthrown a tyrant, hath ever since his first entrance
into his usurped reign, put little in practice but tyr-
anny and the feats thereof.1 For King Richard, our
unnatural uncle, (although desire of rule did blind
him) yet in his other actions, like a true Plantagenet,
was noble, and loved the honour of the realm and the
contentment and comfort of his nobles and people.
But this our mortal enemy, agreeable to the meanness
of his birth, hath trodden under foot the honour of
this nation ; selling our best confederates for money,
and making merchandise of the blood, estates, and for-
tunes of our peers and subjects, by feigned wars and
dishonourable peace, only to enrich his coffers.2 Nor
1 This first paragraph is a kind of abstract of the first page and half of
the real proclamation; of which the words, or a great part of them, have
already been given (from Speed) as part of Perkin's speech to the King.
The substance of them is here recast in quite a different form.
2 1 cannot find any passage in the real proclamation in which any such
allusion to the recent peace is contained, either explicitly or implicitly. I
fancy that, in this instance, Bacon's memory, endeavouring to recover its
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 253
unlike hath been his hateful misorovernment and evil
deportments here at home. First he hath to fortify his
false quarrel1 caused divers nobles of this our realm
(whom he held suspect and stood in dread of) to be
cruelly murdered; as our cousin Sir William Stanley
Lord Chamberlain,2 Sir Simon3 Mountfort, Sir Robert
Ratcliffe, William Dawbeney, Humphrey Stafford, and
ninny others, besides such as have dearly bought their
lives with intolerable ransoms : some of which nobles
are now in the sanctuary. Also he hath long kept,
and yet keepeth in prison, our right entirely well-be-
loved cousin, Edward, son and heir to our uncle Duke
of Clarence, and others ; withholding from them their
impression of the original, — an impression derived perhaps from a single
reading of an inaccurate and illegible manuscript — mistook a suggestion
of his own for a recollection of what he had seen there. His thought as
le read had outrun his eye. He had seen the sort of topics which Perkin
looking for; that topic had at once presented itself to his mind; and
remained afterwards in his memory so associated with the passage, that
forgot it was not a part of it. In men of quick faculties and large
lemories largely tasked, there is no kind of error of memory so common
this. Indeed I suppose there is hardly any man who, if he make a
)int of referring distinctly to his authorities and verifying his references,
rill not find himself occasionally turning for his authority with the great-
st confidence to a place where no such thing is to be found. The value
Bacon's testimony to matters of fact (which I hold very high) depends
)t upon any particular faculty for remembering details, — for his refer-
lces and quotations are often inaccurate, — but upon the capacity and
le habit, far more important to substantial accuracy than the most im-
:cable memory, of taking true impressions in the first instance.
1 The rest of this and the following paragraph are taken word for word
)m Speed; who copied them word for word (with a very few differences
jbably accidental and two or three omissions indicated by et cceteras)
)m Sir Robert Cotton's MS.
5 So Speed. The MS. copy of the proclamation has " our cousin the
Fitzwater, Sir William Stanley, Sir Robert Chamberlain, &c." Lord
'itzwater was beheaded at Calais, according to the old Chronicle, fo. 161.
b. in November, 1496 ; after the date which Bacon would have assigned to
the proclamation.
« So Ed. 1622. The MS. has " Edmond."
254 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
rightful inheritance, to the intent they should never be
of might and power to aid and assist us at our need,
after the duty of their legiances. He also married by
compulsion certain of our sisters, and also the sister of
our said cousin the Earl of Warwick, and divers other
ladies of the royal blood, unto certain of his kinsmen
and friends of simple and low degree ; and, putting
apart all well disposed nobles, he hath none in favour
and trust about his person, but Bishop Foxe, Smith,
Bray, Lovel, Oliver King,1 David Owen, Riseley,
Turbervile,2 Tyler,3 Cholmeley, Empson,4 James Ho-
barte, John Cutte, Garth, Henry Wyate, and such
other caitifs and villains of birth,5 which by subtile in-
ventions and pilling of the people have been the prin-
cipal finders, occasioners, and counsellors of the mis-
rule and mischief now reigning in England.6
" We remembering these premises, with the great
and execrable offences daily committed and done by
our foresaid great enemy and his adherents, in break-
1 The name of Sir Charles Somerset, which follows that of Oliver King
both in Speed and in the MS. proclamation, has been omitted, I suppose
by accident.
2 The MS. proclamation has Sir Joseph Trobulvill: Speed gives Sir John
Trobutuile. Sir John Turbervile is the name given in the Calendar of
Patent Rolls.
8 After the name of Tyler there follow in the MS. proclamation the
names Robert Lytton, Gylforde ; — they are omitted by Speed.
4 The name of Empson is given in the MS. proclamation, but not in
Speed: a circumstance worth observing, because we must suppose that
Bacon supplied the omission from his recollection of the original; the
name of Empson being too notable a one in connexion with Henry VII. to
be overlooked.
6 So Speed. The MS. proclamation has villains of simple birth.
6 Here Speed inserts etc. to mark the omission of a long clause which
follows in the original. It relates to the reward offered for the taking of
Henry, and the substance of it will be found a little further on, — in the
last paragraph but one.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 255
in<r the liberties and franchises of our mother the
o
holy church, u on pretences of wicked and heathenish
policy, to the high displeasure of Almighty God,
besides the manifold treasons, abominable murders,
manslaughters, robberies, extortions, the daily pilling
of the people by dismes, taskes, tallages, benevolences,
and other unlawful impositions and grievous exactions,
with many other hainous effects,1 to the likely destruc-
tion and desolation of the whole realm : 2 shall by
God's grace, and the help and assistance of the great
lords of our blood, with the counsel of other sad
persons,3 see that the commodities of our realm be
employed to the most advantage of the same ; the in-
tercourse of merchandise betwixt realm and realm to
be ministered and handled as shall more be to the com-
mon weal and prosperity of our subjects ; and all such
dismes, taskes, tallages, benevolences, unlawful impo-
tions, and grievous exactions as be above rehearsed,
be foredone and laid apart, and never from hence-
forth to be called upon, but in such cases as our noble
progenitors Kings of England have of old time been
accustomed to have the aid, succour, and help of their
subjects and true liege-men.4
1 So Speed. The MS. proclamation has " offences; " which is probably
the right woi-d.
2 Here Speed inserts an cfc. ; a few lines being omitted.
8 Here again Speed inserts an #c. ; a passage being omitted of some
length, the substance of which Bacon has worked up into the following
paragraph.
4 This is the end of Speed's extract; who gives no more. The three
remaining paragraphs appear to have been supplied by Bacon from mem-
ory : and contain the substance of all the rest. He has made no attempt
(or else an unsuccessful one) to preserve the form and order of the real
proclamation ; but upon a careful comparison of the two I have not been
able to find anything material here which is not implied in the original, or
anything material in the original which is not expressed here.
256 HISTOEY OF KING HENRY VII.
" And farther we do out of our grace and clemency
hereby as well publish and promise to all our subjects
remission and free pardon of all by-past offences what-
soever against our person or estate, in adhering to our
said enemy, by whom we know well they have been
misled ; if they shall within time convenient submit
themselves unto us. And for such as shall come with
the foremost to assist our righteous quarrel, we shall
make them so far partakers of our princely favour and
bounty, as shall be highly for the comfort of them and
theirs both during their life and after their death. As
also we shall, by all means which God shall put into
our hands, demean ourselves to give royal contentment
to all degrees and estates of our people ; maintaining
the liberties of holy church in their entire, preserving
the honours, privileges, and preeminences of our nobles
from contempt or disparagement, according to the dig-
nity of their blood : we shall also unyoke our people
from all heavy burdens and endurances, and confirm
our cities, boroughs, and towns in their charters and
freedoms, with enlargement where it shall be deserved ;
and in all points give our subjects cause to think that
the blessed and debonaire government of our noble
father King Edward in his last times is in us revived.
" And forasmuch as the putting to death or taking
alive of our said mortal enemy may be a mean to stay
much effusion of blood, which otherwise may ensue if
by compulsion or fair promises he shall draw after him
any number of our subjects to resist us ; which we de-
sire to avoid (though we be certainly informed that our
said enemy is purposed and prepared to fly the land,
having already made over great masses of the treas-
ure of our crown the better to support him in foreign
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
257
parts) ; we do hereby declare that whosoever shall
take or distress our said enemy, though the party be
of never so mean a condition, he shall be by us re-
warded with 1000Z. in money, forthwith to be laid
down to him, and an hundred marks by the year of
inheritance ; besides that he may otherwise merit, both
toward God and all good people, for the destruction of
such a tyrant.
" Lastly, we do all men to wit (and herein we take
also God to witness) that whereas God hath moved the
heart of our dearest cousin the King of Scotland to aid
us in person in this our righteous quarrel, that it is
altogether without any pact or promise, or so much as
demand, of any thing that may prejudice our crown or
subjects ; but contrariwise with promise on our said
cousin's part, that whensoever he shall find us in suf-
ficient strength to get the upper hand of our enemy
(which we hope will be very suddenly), he will forth-
with peaceably return into his own kingdom, content-
ing himself only with the glory of so honourable an
enterprise, and our true and faithful love and amity:
which we shall ever by the grace of Almighty God so
order as shall be to the great comfort of both king-
doms."
But Perkin's proclamation did little edify with the
people of England. Neither was he the better wel-
come for the company he came in. Wherefore the
King of Scotland, seeing none came in to Perkin nor
none stirred any where in his favour, turned his en-
terprise into a rode ; ] and wasted and destroyed the
1 Spelt "road" in MS. — James's preparations seem to have been com-
plete by the middle of September, 1496 ; but he waited, I suppose, for the
promised rising of the English in Perkin's favour. Henry in the mean-
time was informed by his friends in the Scotch Court of everything that
vol. xi. 17
258 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.'
country of Northumberland with fire and sword. But
hearing that there were forces coming against him, and
not willing that they should find his men heavy and
laden with booty, he returned into Scotland with great
spoils, deferring further prosecution till another time.
It is said that Perkin, acting the part of a prince hand-
somely, when he saw the Scottish fell to waste the
country, came to the King in a passionate manner,
making great lamentation, and desired that that might
not be the manner of making the war ; for that no
crown was so dear to his mind, as that he desired to
purchase it with the blood and ruin of his country.
Whereunto the King answered half in sport, that he
doubted much he was careful for that that was none of
his ; and that he should be too good a steward for his
enemy, to save the country to his use.1
By this time, being the eleventh year of the King,
the interruption of trade between the English and the
Flemish began to pinch the merchants of both nations
very sore, which moved them by all means they could
devise to affect and dispose their sovereigns respectively
to open the intercourse again. Wherein time favoured
them. For the Archduke and his counsel began to see
that Perkin would prove but a runagate and citizen of
the world ; and that it was the part of children to fall
out about babies.2 And the King on his part, after the
attempts upon Kent and Northumberland,3 began to
was going on: and knew that he was secure against any serious impres-
sion from that side. Whether he was prepared for this kind of predatory
incursion or not, seems to be doubtful.
1 This, and most of the particulars of Perkin's proceedings in Scotland,
may be found in Buchanan. See Rer. Scot. Hist. XIII. 10, et seq.
2 Pupas : i. e. dolls. So in ^lacbeth : " the baby of a girl."
3 Post impressiones Mas in Cantium et Northumbriam factas et frustralas.
It is to be remembered however that the attempt upon Northumberland
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 259
h:ive the business of Perkin in less estimation ; so as
he did not put it to account in any consultation of
state. But that that moved him most was, that being
a King that loved wealth and treasure, he could not
endure to have trade sick, nor any obstruction to con-
tinue in the gate-vein, which disperseth that blood.
And yet he kept state so far, as first to be sought unto.
Wherein the Merchant Adventurers likewise being a
strong company (at that time) and well under-set with
rich men and good order,1 did hold out bravely ; taking
off the commodities of the kingdom, though they lay
dead upon their hands for want of vent. At the last,
commissioners met at London to treat. On the King's
part, Bishop Foxe Lord Privy Seal, Viscount Wells,
Kendall Prior of Saint John's, and Warham Master
of the Rolls (who began to gain much upon the King's
opinion), and Urswick, who was almost every one, and
IRiseley. On the Archduke's part, the Lord Bevers
lis Admiral, the Lord Verunsell President of Flan-
lers, and others. These concluded a perfect treaty2
iad not yet been made. At the time Bacon is now speaking of, Perkin's
brtunes at the Scotch Court were in full flower. See note 1. p. 250.
1 Magno locupletum numero et bonis contributionibus corroborata.
2 I find from the old Chronicle (Vitel. A. xvi. fo. 157. b.) that the
Archduke's commissioners were received in London on Candlemas Even
(1. Feb.) 1495-6: and that the treaty was concluded in the following April.
The Chronicler (evidently a contemporary citizen) adds a circumstance
hich is worth recording as an illustration of the relation which subsisted
tween the King and the City of London.
For the assurance of the same," he says speaking of the treaty,
" above and beside both the seals of either princes was granted divers
towns of this land to be bound ; whereof London was one ; . . . . which
sealing when it should have been performed, the Commons of the City
would not be agreeable that their seal should pass. And albeit that my
Lord of Derby, the Lord Treasurer, the Chief Justice of England, Master
Bray, and the Master of the Rolls, by the King's commandment came unto
Guildhall to exhort the said Commons for the same, yet in no wise they
=
260 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
both of amity and intercourse between the King and
the Archduke ; containing articles both of state, com-
merce, and free fishing. This is that treaty which the
Flemings call at this day intercursus magnus ; both be-
cause it is more complete than the precedent treaties
of the third and fourth year of the King ; and chiefly
to give it a difference from the treaty that followed in
the one and twentieth year of the King, which they
call intercursus malus. In this treaty there was an
express article against the reception of the rebels of
either prince by other ; purporting that if any such
rebel should be required by the prince whose rebel he
was of the prince confederate, that forthwith the prince
confederate should by proclamation command him to
avoid his country : which if he did not within fifteen
days, the rebel was to stand proscribed, and put out of
protection. But nevertheless in this article Perkin was
not named, neither perhaps contained, because he was
no rebel. But by this means his wings were dipt of
his followers that were English. And it was expressly
comprised in the treaty, that it should extend to the
territories of the Duchess Dowager. After the in-
tercourse thus restored, the English merchants came
again to their mansion at Antwerp, where they were
received with procession and great joy.
The winter following, being the twelfth year of his
reign, the King called again his Parliament ; l where
would not be agreeable that the town seal should pass; but besought the
said Lords to grant unto them respite of six days, trusting by that season
to show in writing such considerations unto the King's Grace and his
Counsel that his Grace should be therewith well contented. Which was
to them granted, and thereupon divers bills were devised," &c. The end
was that the Mayor's seal was taken only.
1 So Polydore Vergil: coacto principum concilio.
A Parliament met on the 16th of January, 1496-7, in which supplies
HISTORY OF KING HENBY VII. 261
he did much exaggerate both the malice and the
cruel predatory war lately made by the King of Scot-
were voted for the Scottish war. But on this, as on the two former occa-
sions already mentioned, Henry had taken the precaution to call a " Great
Council" first. He seems to have been in no hurry, and it is probable
that he waited purposely until some overt act of hostility on the part of
the Scotch should excite the alarm or exasperate the resentment of his
own people, and make them less careful of their money. It is certain that
on the 8th of September one of his spies in the Scotch Court sent him
word that James would be upon the borders at the head of his army on
the 15th, and that before the end of the following month, a Great Coun-
cil had been held and agreed to a grant of 120,000/. for defence against the
Scots.
"In this year" (says the old Chronicle, meaning the 12th year of
Henry's reign, — i. e. 22 Aug. 1496 — 21 Aug. 1497) "the 24th of October,
began a Great Counsel holden at Westminster by the King and his Lords
spiritual and temporal; to the which Counsel come certain burgesses and
merchants of all cities and good towns of England ; at which Counsel was
granted unto the King for the defence of the Scots 120,000/. : which Coun-
sel ended the 6th day of November,"
In addition to this " grant," as the Chronicler calls it, — (which was no
more, I suppose, than a pledge on the part of the members of the Council
to support such a grant if proposed in Parliament) — they appear to have
RFered in the meantime to lend the King large sums of ready money, each
r himself ; and to have advised the borrowing of money upon privy
als, to the amount of 40,000/. more. This circumstance (of which, sin-
ilarly enough, no trace appears in any of our histories) is proved beyond
spute by an original Privy Seal bearing Henry the 7th's sign manual,
id dated at Westminster on the 1st of December; which is still preserved
nong the Cotton MSS. (Titus, B. V. fo. 145.) It is addressed to a gen-
tleman of Hereford and the sum applied for is 20/. But blank spaces have
been left for the county and the sum; which shows that it was a general
form. It sets forth that " for the revenging of the great cruelty and dis-
honour that the King of Scots hath done unto us, our realm, and subjects
of the same, as our Commissioners in our County of Hereford where ye
be inhabited shall shew unto you at length, we lately in our Great Coun-
1 of Lords spiritual and temporal, of Judges, Sergeants in our law, and
others some headwisemen of every city and good town of this our land,
ve at their instances and by their advices determined us to make by
and by land two armies royal for a substantial war to be continued
on the Scots unto such time as we shall invade the realm of Scotland
our own person and shall have with God's grace revenged their great
trages done unto us our realm and subjects aforesaid, so and in such
ise as we trust the same our subjects shall live in rest and peace for
any years to come. The lords and others of our said Great Counsel,
262 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
land : That that King, being in amity with him, and
no ways provoked, should so burn in hatred towards
him, as to drink of the lees and dregs of Perkin's
considering well that the said substantial war cannot be borne but by-
great sums of ready money, have prested unto us, every one of them for
his part, great sums of money contented ; besides that we have of ourself
avanced out of our own coffers; yet natheless 40,000/. more, as our said
Counsel hath cast it, must of necessity be borrowed and avanced in ready
money of others our loving subjects for the furniture of this matter. And
because as we hear ye be a man of good substance, we desire and pray
you to make loan unto us of the sum of 20/. whereof ye shall be undoubt-
edly and assuredly repaid," &c. &c.
In confirmation again of this we find in the old Chronicle (fo. 161. b.)
that "upon the Sunday following" [the 18th of November being the date
last mentioned] " was sent from the King's ma. Sir Reginald Bray with
other of the King's Counsel to the Mayor to borrow of the city 10,000/.
And upon the Thursday next following was granted by a Common Coun-
sel to lend to the King 4000/." The Chronicler adds, a little further on
(fo. 162. b.) that there was that year " lent unto the King for a year day
throughout all England many and great sums of money, whereof the fore-
said sum of 4000/ lent by the City of London, as before is said, was parcel
of the same. The whole sum of all the land borrowed amounted to
58,000/. and more."
Among the records preserved in the Rolls-house are to be found two
more of these privy seals (see B. V. 1. Nos. 32, 33.), as well as an account
of all the sums borrowed (see B. V. 20.) ; amounting in all to £57,388 10s. 2c?.
This latter document is inaccurately described on the cover as an account
of the Benevolence, A° H. 7. 12°. It should have been called Loan.
I have not been able to ascertain the exact period at which the Scotch
incursion took place, but it seems probable that this hurried borrowing of
money (partly for immediate use and partly perhaps as a collateral secu-
rity for the promised Parliamentary grant) followed immediately upon it,
while the alarm and resentment were fresh. Thus the King was provided
with the sinews of war for the present and might act as he saw occasion.
But as yet he was only furnished with money lent, which was to be repaid.
The next thing was to secure the grant; and for this purpose a Parliament
was called on the 16th of January, which granted him for the Scotch war,
first two fifteenths and tenths; and then (because this was not enough) a
subsidy equal to two fifteenths and tenths which it seems amounted to
120,000/. (See Stat, of Realm, p. 644.) In the "index vocabulorum "
Bacon explains that a Fifteen was a kind of pecuniary aid granted only by
authority of Parliament: which, to judge by the name, should be a fifteenth
part of men's goods, but had in fact a fixed value, — not nearly so much:
Consuetudine in solutionem certain, et huge minus gravem, redactum.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 263
intoxication, who was every where else detected and
discarded: and that when he perceived it was out of
his reach to do the King any hurt, he had turned his
arms upon unarmed and unprovided people, to spoil
only and depopulate, contrary to the laws both of war
and peace : concluding, that he could neither with
honour nor with the safety of his people to whom he
did owe protection, let pass these wrongs unrevenged.
The Parliament understood him well, and gave him a
subsidy limited to the sum J of one hundred and twenty
thousand pounds, besides two fifteens : for his wars
were always to him as a mine of treasure of a strange
kind of ore ; 2 iron at the top, and gold and silver at
the bottom. At this 3 Parliament, for that there had
been so much time spent in making laws the year
before, and for that it was called purposely in respect
of the Scottish war, there were no laws made to be
remembered. Only there passed a law, at the suit of
the Merchant Adventurers of England,4 against the
Merchant Adventurers of London, for monopolising
and exacting upon the trade ; 5 which it seemeth they
did a little to save themselves, after the hard time
they had sustained by want of trade. But those inno-
vations were taken away by Parliament.
But it was fatal to the King to fight for his money.
And though he avoided to fight with enemies abroad,
yet he was still enforced to fight for it with rebels at
home. For no sooner began the subsidy to be levied 8
1 Limitatum certe ; sed tamen amplissimum ; ad summam videlicet, &c.
2 Spelt ure in MS.
» So Ed. 1622. The MS. has " the."
4 Pei' Angliam sparsorum.
6 Propter monopolium quoddam, et exactiones ruwas mercibus impositas.
6 The grant was passed on the 13th of February, 1496-7.
264 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
in Cornwall, but the people there grew 1 to grudge and
murmur ; the Cornish being a race of men stout of
stomach, mighty of body and limb, and that lived
hardly in a barren country, and many of them could
for a need live under-ground, that were tinners. They
muttered extremely, that it was a thing not to be suf-
fered that for a little stir of the Scots, soon blown over,
they should be thus grinded to powder with payments :
and said it was for them to pay that had too much,
and lived idly ; but they would eat their bread that
they got with the sweat of their brows, and no man
should take it from them. And as in the tides of
people once up there want not commonly stirring
winds to make them more rough ; so this people did
light upon two ringleaders or captains of the rou^.2
The one was Michael Joseph, a blacksmith or farrier
of Bodmin, a notable talking fellow, and no less de-
sirous to be talked of. The other was Thomas Flam-
mock, a lawyer, that3 by telling his neighbours com-
monly upon any occasion that the law was on their
side, had gotten great sway amongst them. This man
talked learnedly, and as if he could tell how to make
a rebellion and never break the peace. He told the
people4 that subsidies were not to be granted nor
levied in this case ; that is for wars of Scotland : for
that the law had provided another course by service
of escuage,5 for those journeys ; much less when all
was quiet, and war was made but a pretence to poll
and pill the people. And therefore that it was good
i So MS. Ed. 1622 has " began."
2 Rebellionis faces.
3 So MS. Ed. 1622 has "who."
4 Populum autem magno cum supercifio edocuit.
5 Obligatio tenentis qua astringebatur ad bella cum Scotis. (Ind. Vocab.)
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 265
they should not stand1 like sheep before the shearers,
but put on harness and take weapons in their hands ;
yet to do no creature hurt, but go and deliver the
King a strong petition a for the laying down of those
grievous^ payments, and for the punishment of those
that had given him that counsel, to make others be-
ware how they did the like in time to come. And
said for his part he did not see how they could do the
duty of true Englishmen and good liege-men, except
they did deliver the King from such wicked ones that
would destroy both him and the country. Their aim
was at Archbishop Morton and Sir Reignold Bray,
who were the King's screens in this envy.
After that these two, Flammock and the blacksmith,
had by joint and several pratings3 found tokens of
consent in the multitude, they offered themselves to
lead them, until they should hear of better men to
e their leaders, which they said would be ere long :
lling them further, that they would be but their ser-
ants, and first in every danger ; but doubted not but
make both the west-end and the east-end of Eng-
nd to meet in so good a quarrel ; and that all (rightly
derstood) was but for the King's service.
The people upon these seditious instigations did arm,
ost of them with bows and arrows, and bills, and
ch other weapons of rude and country people ; and
rthwith under the command of their leaders (which
such cases is ever at pleasure) 4 marched out of
i Ed. 1622 " stand now."
2 Petitionem validd manu porrigerent.
8 i. e. by talking to the people sometimes in companies, and sometimes
singly. The translation expresses it more at large — garrulitate sua,par-
tim public e partim secreto, aures populi implessent et animos vulgi inclinatos et
promptos ad consilia sua invenissent.
* Ad pladtum populi.
266 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Cornwall l through Devonshire unto Taunton in Som-
ersetshire, without any slaughter, violence, or spoil of
the country. At Taunton 2 they killed in fury an of-
ficious and eager commissioner for the subsidy, whom
they called the Provost of Perin. Thence they
marched to Wells, where the Lord Audley (with
whom their leaders had before some secret intelli-
gence), a nobleman of an ancient family, but unquiet
and popular and aspiring to ruin, came in to them, and
was by them with great gladness and cries of joy ac-
cepted as their general ; they being now proud that
they were led by a nobleman. The Lord Audley led
them on from Wells to Salisbury, and from Salisbury
to Winchester. Thence the foolish people (who in
effect led their leaders) had a mind to be led into
Kent ; fancying that the people there would join with
them ; contrary to all reason or judgment ; considering
the Kentish men had shewed great loyalty and affec-
tion to the King so lately before. But the rude peo-
ple3 had heard Flammock say that Kent was never
conquered, and that they were the freest people4 of
England. And upon these vain noises, they looked
for great matters at their hands, in a cause which thev
conceited to be for the liberty of the subject. But
when they were comen into Kent, the country was so
well settled, both by the King's late kind usage tow-
ards them, and by the credit and power of the Earl of
Kent, the Lord Abergavenny, and the Lord Cobham,
1 In the latter end of May, according to the old Chronicle.
2 So Stowe; and after him Speed. The old Chronicle however dates
this fact later: i. e. in the latter end of September when Perkin was in
sanctuary, and says it was done by " one James, a robber, who had gath-
ered 6 or 700 rebels to assist Perkin." ( Vitel. A. xvi. fo. 167.)
8 Fatuw iste populus.
* Homines inter Anglos in libertate asserenda acerrimos.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 267
as neither gentleman nor yeoman came in to their aid ;
which did much damp and dismay many of the sim-
pler sort ; insomuch as divers of them did secretly fly
from the army and went home ; but the sturdier sort,
and those that were most engaged, stood by it, and
rather waxed proud than failed in hopes and courage.
For as it did somewhat appall them, that the people
came not in to them ; so it did no less encourage them,
that the King's forces had not set upon them, having
marched from the west unto the east of England.
Wherefore they kept on their way, and encamped
upon Blackheath,1 between Greenwich and Eltham ;
threatening either to bid battle to the King (for now
the seas went higher than to Morton and Bray), or to
take London within his view ; imagining with them-
selves there to find no less fear than wealth.
But to return to the King. When first he heard of
this commotion of the Cornishmen occasioned by the
subsidy, he was much troubled therewith ; not for it-
self, but in regard of the concurrence of other dangers
that did hano; over him at that time. For he doubted
lest a war from Scotland, a rebellion from Cornwall,
and the practices and conspiracies of Perkin and his
partakers, would come upon him at once : knowing
well that it was a dangerous triplicity to a monarchy,
to have the arms of a foreigner, the discontents of
subjects, and the title of a pretender to meet. Never-
theless the occasion took him in some part well pro-
vided. For as soon as the Parliament had broken up,
the King had presently raised a puissant army to war
upon Scotland. And King James of Scotland likewise
on his part had made great preparations, either for de-
1 On Friday, June 16th (old Chron. fo. 163. b.)
268 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
fence or for a new assailing1 of England. But as for
the King's forces, they were not only in preparation,
but in readiness presently to set forth, under the con-
duct of Dawbeney the Lord Chamberlain. But as
soon as the King understood of the rebellion of Corn-
wall, he stayed those forces, retaining them for his
own service and safety. But therewithal he dis-
patched the Earl of Surrey into the north, for the
defence and strength of those parts, in case the Scots
should stir. But for the course he held towards the
rebels, it was utterly differing from his former custom
and practice ; which was ever full of forwardness and
celerity to make head against them, or to set upon
them as soon as ever they were in action. This he
was wont to do ; but now, besides that he was attem-
pered by years, and less in love with dangers by the
continued fruition of a crown, it was a time when the
various appearance to his thoughts of perils of several
natures and from divers parts did make him judge it
his best and surest way to keep his strength together
in the seat and centre of his kingdom ; according to
the ancient Indian emblem — in such a swelling sea-
son, to hold the hand upon the middle of the bladder,
that no side might rise. Besides, there was no necessity
put upon him to alter this counsel. For neither did
the rebels spoil the country, in which case it had been
dishonour to abandon his people, neither on the other
side did their forces gather or increase, which might
hasten him to precipitate, and assail them before they
grew too strong. And lastly, both reason of estate
and war seemed to agree with this course. For that
insurrections of base people are commonly more furi-
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 omits u a."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 269
ous in their beginnings. And by this means also he
had them the more at vantage, being tired and har-
assed with a long march ; 1 and more at mercy, being
cut off far from their country, and therefore not able
by any sudden flight to get to retreat, and to renew
the troubles.
When therefore the rebels were encamped in2
Blackheath upon the hill, whence they might behold
the city of London, and the fair valley about it ; the
King, knowing well that it stood him upon,3 by how
much the more he had hitherto protracted the time in
not encountering them, by so much the sooner to dis-
patch with them ; 4 that it might appear to have been
no coldness in fore-slowing but wisdom in choosing his
time ; resolved with all speed to assail them ; and yet
with that providence and surety as should leave little
to venture or fortune. And having very great and
puissant forces about him, the better to master all
events and accidents, he5 divided them into three
parts. The first was led by the Earl of Oxford in
chief, assisted by the Earls of Essex and Suffolk.
These noblemen were appointed, with some cornets6
of horse and bands of foot, and good store of artillery,
wheeling about to put themselves beyond the hill
where the rebels were encamped, and to beset all the
1 These words are omitted in the translation: which only has eos plus in
arcto habebat et magis sibi obnoxios, cum longe a pairia sua remoti essent ;
ideoque fieri non patera t ut domum se reciperent et motus fortasse renovarent.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " on."
8 Plurimum honoris sui interesse. So Hamlet ;
" Doth it not, think'st thou, stand me now upon ? n
The expression was in use as late as Locke's time.
* Prcelium consereret.
6 So Ed. 1622. The MS. omits " he."
6 Turmis aliquot equitum.
270 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
skirts and descents thereof, except those that lay tow-
ards London ; thereby to have these wild beasts as it
were in a toil. The second part of his forces (which
were those that were to be most in action, and upon
which he relied most for the fortune of the day) he
did assign to be led by the Lord Chamberlain, who
was appointed to set upon the rebels in front, from that
side which is towards London. The third part of his
forces (being likewise great and brave forces) he re-
tained about himself, to be ready upon all events ; to
restore the fight or consummate the victory ; and
meanwhile to secure the city. And for that purpose
he encamped in person in Saint George's Fields, put-
ting himself between the city and the rebels.
But the City of London, especially at the first upon
the near encamping of the rebels, was in great tumult ;
as it useth to be with wealthy and populous cities, es-
pecially those which being for greatness and fortune
queens of their regions, do seldom see out of their
windows or from their towers an army of enemies.1
But that which troubled them most was the conceit
that they dealt with a rout of people, with whom there
was no composition or condition, or orderly treating, if
need were ; but likely to be bent altogether upon rap-
ine and spoil. And although they had heard that the
rebels had behaved themselves quietly and modestly by
the way as they went ; yet they doubted much that
would not last, but rather make them more hungry,
and more in appetite to fall upon spoil in the end.
Wherefore there was great running to and fro of peo-
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " as it useth to be with wealthy and populous
cities (especially those which for greatness and fortune are Queens of their
regions) who seldom see," &c.
:
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 271
pie, some to the gates, some to the walls, some to the
water-side ; giving themselves alarms and panic fears
continually. Nevertheless both Tate the Lord Mayor
and Shaw and Haddon the Sheriffs did their parts
stoutly and well, in arming and ordering the people ;
and the King likewise did adjoin some captains of ex-
perience in the Wars to advise and assist the citizens.
But soon after when they understood that the King
had so ordered the matter, that the rebels must win
three battles before they could approach the city, and
that he had put his Own person between the rebels and
them, and that the great care was rather how to im-
pound the rebels that none of them might escape, than
that any doubt was made to vanquish them ; they
grew to be quiet and out of fear ; the rather for the
confidence they reposed (which was not small) in the
three leaders, Oxford, Essex, and Dawbeney ; all men
well famed and loved amongst the people. As for
per Duke of Bedford, whom the King used to em-
ploy with the first in his wars, he was then sick, and
died soon after.
It was the two and twentieth of June,1 and a Sat-
urday (which was the day of the week the King
fancied2), when the battle was fought; though the
King had by all the art he could devise given out a
false day, as if he prepared to give the rebels battle on
e Monday following, the better to find them unpro-
ded and in disarray. The lords that were appointed
o circle the hill, had some days before planted them-
wei
Jas
1 This is the date given by Stowe. The old Chronicle however (fo. 64.),
calls it the 17th ; which is no doubt right. The 22nd of June, 1497, fell on
a Thursday.
2 Profousto ducebat.
272 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
selves (as at the receipt1) in places convenient. In
the afternoon towards the decline of the day, (which
was done the better to keep the rebels in opinion that
they should not fight that day,) the Lord Dawbeney
marched on towards them, and first beat some troops
of them from Deptford-bridge ; where they fought
manfully, but being in no great number were soon
driven back, and fled up to their main army upon the
hill. The army 2 at that time hearing of the approach
of the King's forces, were putting themselves in array
not without much confusion. But neither had they
placed 3 upon the first high ground towards the bridge
any forces to second the troops below that kept the
bridge ; neither had they brought forwards their main
battle (which stood in array far into the heath) near to
the ascent of the hill ; 4 so that the Earl with his forces
mounted the hill and recovered5 the plain without
resistance. The Lord Dawbeney charged them with
great fury ; insomuch as it had like by accident to
have brandled the fortune of the day.6 For by incon-
siderate forwardness in fighting in the head of his
troops, he was taken by the rebels, but immediately
rescued and delivered. The rebels maintained the
fight for a small time, and for their persons shewed no
want of courage.7 But being ill armed and ill led and
1 I suppose this means " as having to make arrangements for receiving
them." The translation has rebelles intercepturi.
2 i. e. the main army of the rebels. Exercitus rebellium.
8 The translation adds ut ratio belli postulabat.
4 Thereby giving up their vantage-ground. Neque exercitum suum prom-
overunt ad acclivia collis, ubi iniquo loco a regis copiis pugnam conseri ne-
cessefuisset ; sed in planitie collis procul insiruxerunt.
6 "Recovered" means merely "gained; " not "got back again." uEquo
loco se sisteret. It was a very common use of the word in Bacon's time.
6 Ita utfortuna ejus diei periclitaretur.
' Neque ignave rem gesserunt.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
273
without horse or artillery, they were with no great
difficulty cut in pieces l and put to flight. And for
their three leaders, the Lord Audley, the blacksmith,
and Flammock, (as commonly the captains of commo-
tions are but half-couraged men,) suffered themselves
to be taken alive. The number slain on the rebels'
part were some two thousand men ; 2 their army
amounting as it is said, unto the number sixteen thou-
sand.3 The rest were in effect all taken ; for that the
hill (as was said) was encompassed with the King's
forces round about. On the King's part there died
about three hundred, most of them shot with arrows,
which were reported to be of the length of a taylor's
yard ; 4 so strong and mighty a bow the Cornishmen
were said to draw.
The victory thus obtained, the King created divers
bannerets, as well upon Blackheath, where his lieuten-
ant had won the field, (whither he rode in person to
perform the said creation) as in St. George's Fields,
where his own person had been encamped. And for
latter of liberality, he did by open edict give the
roods of all the prisoners unto those that had taken
iem ; either to take them in kind or compound for
them as they could. After matter of honour and
liberality, followed matter of severity and execution,
'he Lord Audley was led from Newgate to Tower-
till, in a paper coat painted with his own arms ; the
1 Devicti.
2 So Polydore. Stowe says only 300.
s "And their company," says the old Chronicle, fo. 163., "was that day
Monday 12 June] accounted to the number of 15,000 men."
* " Whose arrows" (says Hall) "as is reported, were in length a full
trrf." There is a question as to the length of the " cloth-yard shaft,"
)ut " a full yard " must be taken, I presume, to mean thirty-six inches.
VOL. xi. 18
274 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
arms reversed, the coat torn ; and at Tower-Hill be-
headed.1 Flammock and the blacksmith were hanged
drawn and quartered at Tyburn : 2 the blacksmith tak-
ing pleasure upon the hurdle (as it seemeth by words
that he uttered) to think that he should be famous in
after-times. The King was once in mind to have sent
down Flammock and the blacksmith to have been exe-
cuted in Cornwall, for the more terror. But being
advertised that the country was yet unquiet and boil-
ing, he thought better not to irritate the people further.
All the rest were pardoned by proclamation, and to
take out their pardons under seal as many as would.
So that more than the blood drawn in the field, the
King did satisfy himself with the lives of only three
offenders for the expiation of this great rebellion.
It was a strange thing to observe the variety and
inequality of the King's executions and pardons : ;md
a man would think it at the first a kind of lottery or
chance. But looking into it more nearly, one shall
find there was reason for it ; much more perhaps, than
after so long a distance of time we can now discern.
In the Kentish commotion (which was but an handful
of men) there were executed to the number of one
hundred and fifty ; and 3 in this so mighty a rebellion
but three. Whether it were that the King put to ac-
count the men that were slain in the field ; or that he
was not willing to be severe in a popular cause ; or
that the harmless behaviour of this people, that came
from the west of England to the east without mischief
(almost) or spoil of the country, did somewhat mollify
1 On Wednesday the 28th of June (old Chron.) Ed. 1622 has "and he
at Tower Hill beheaded."
2 On Tuesday the 27th of June (old Chron.).
3 So Ed. 1622. The MS. has "but."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 275
liim and move him to compassion ; or lastly, that he
made a great difference between people that did rebel
upon wantonness, and them that did rebel upon want.
After the Coraishmen were defeated, there came
from Calais to the King an honourable ambassage from
the French King ; which had arrived at Calais a month
before, and was there stayed in respect of the troubles ;
but honourably entertained and defrayed. The King
at their first coming sent unto them, and prayed them
to have patience, till a little smoke that was raised in
his country, were over ; which would soon be : slight-
ing (as his manner was) that openly, which neverthe-
less he intended seriously. This ambassage concerned
no great affair, but only the prolongation of days for
payment of money, and some other particulars of the
frontiers : and it was indeed but a wooing ambassage,
ith good respects to entertain the King in good affec-
ion. But nothing was done or handled to the deroga-
tion of the King's late treaty with the Italians.
But during the time that the Cornishmen were in
teir march towards London, the King of Scotland,
rell advertised of all that passed and knowing himself
sure of a war from England whensoever those stirs
rere appeased, neglected not his opportunity ; but
linking the King had his hands full, entered the
mtiers of England again with an army, and besieged
le castle of Norham in person with part of his forces,
mding the rest to forage the country. But Foxe
►ishop of Duresme, a wise man, and one that could
je through the present to the future, doubting as
Luch before, had caused his castle of Norham to be
strongly fortified, and furnished with all kind of muni-
tion ; and had manned it likewise with a very great
276 HISTOEY OF KING HENRY VII.
number of tall soldiers 1 more than for the proportion
of the castle, reckoning rather upon a sharp assault
than a long siege. And for the country likewise, he
had caused the people to withdraw their cattle and
goods into fast places, that were not of easy approach ;
and sent in post to the Earl of Surrey (who was not
far off in Yorkshire) to come in diligence to the suc-
cour. So as the Scottish King both failed of doing
good upon the castle, and his men had but a catching
harvest of their spoils.2 And when he understood that
the Earl of Surrey was coming on with great forces,
he returned back into Scotland. The Earl finding the
castle freed, and the enemy retired, pursued with all
celerity into Scotland ; hoping to have overtaken the
Scottish King, and to have given him battle. But not
attaining him in time, sat down before the castle of
Aton, one of the strongest places (then esteemed) be-
tween Berwick and Edinburgh ; which in a small time
he took. And soon after the Scottish King retiring
further into his country, and the weather being ex-
traordinary foul and stormy ; the Earl returned into
England. So that the expeditions on both parts were
(in effect) but a castle taken and a castle distressed ;
not answerable to the puissance of the forces, nor to
the heat of the quarrel, nor to the greatness of the
expectation.
1 Militum fortissimorum.
2 El militibus prcedam satis jejunam compararet.
According to Stowe the army tinder Surrey was sent in July. The
" an. reg. 13" in the margin is probably misplaced. It must have been in
1497, — the 11th month of Henry's 12th year. Fabyan gives the year, but
I think not the month.
Buchanan (xiii. 16.) represents the invasion as having taken place im-
mediately upon news arriving in Scotland of the Cornish rebellion : which
would be about the end of May.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 277
Amongst these troubles both civil and external,
came into England from Spain, Peter Hialas, some
call him Elias (surely he was the forerunner of the
good hap that we enjoy at this day : for his ambas-
sage set x the truce between England and Scotland ;
the truce drew on the peace ; the peace the mar-
riage ; and the marriage the union of the kingdoms) ;
a man of great wisdom,5* and (as those times were)
not unlearned ; sent from Ferdinando and Isabella,
Kings of Spain, unto the King, to treat a marriage
between Katherine, their second daughter, and Prince
Arthur. This treaty was by him set in a very good
way ; 3 and almost brought to perfection. But it
so fell out by the way, that upon some conference
which he had with the King touching this business,
the King (who had a great dexterity in getting
suddenly into the bosom of ambassadors of foreign
Princes, if he liked the men ; insomuch as he would
many times communicate with them of his own af-
fairs, yea and employ them in his service,) fell into
speech and discourse incidently, concerning the end-
ing of the debates and differences with Scotland. For
the King naturally did not love the barren wars with
Scotland ; though he made his profit of the noise of
them : and he wanted not in the counsel of Scotland
those that would advise their King to meet him at
the half way, and to give over the war with Eng-
land ; pretending to be good patriots, but indeed fa-
vouring the affairs of the King. Only his heart was
too great to begin with Scotland for the motion of
1 Induxit.
-Prudens. Wherever "wise" occurs in the English, it is translated
prudens in the Latin.
8 Dexteritate legati non segniter promotus.
278 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
peace. On the other side, he had met with an ally
of Ferdinando of Arragon, as fit for his turn as could
be. For after that King Ferdinando had upon as-
sured confidence of the marriage to succeed taken
upon him the person of a fraternal ally to the King,
he would not let,1 in a Spanish gravity, to counsel
the Kins; in his own affairs. And the Kino; on his
part not being wanting to himself, but making use
of every man's humours, made his advantage of this
in such things as he thought either not decent or not
pleasant to proceed from himself; putting them off
as done by the counsel of Ferdinando : wherefore he
was content that Hialas (as in a matter moved and
advised from Hialas himself) should go into Scot-
land, to treat of a concord between the two Kings.
Hialas took it upon him, and coming to the Scottish
King, after he had with much art brought King
James to hearken to the more safe and quiet coun-
sels, writ unto the King that he hoped that peace
would with no great difficulty cement and close, if
he would send some wise and temperate counsellor of
his own, that might treat of the conditions. Where-
upon the King directed Bishop Foxe (who at that
time was at his castle of Norham) to confer with
Hialas, and they both to treat with some commission-
ers deputed from the Scottish King. The commis-
sioners on both sides met.2 But after much dispute
upon the articles and conditions of peace propounded
upon either part, they could not conclude a peace.
The chief impediment thereof was the demand of the
1 Non dubitabat.
2 At Jedburgh, according to Buchanan, xiii. 17.; from whom most of
these particulars appear to have been taken. But one of the commenta-
tors, speaking on the authority of documents, says they met at Aton.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 279
King to have Perkin delivered into liis hands ; as a
reproach to all Kings, and a person not protected by
the law of nations. The King of Scotland on the
other side peremptorily denied so to do ; saying that
he fortius part was no competent judge of Perkin's
title : but that he had received him as a suppliant, pro-
tected him as a person fled for refuge, espoused him
with his kinswoman, and aided him with his arms,
upon the belief that he was a Prince ; and therefore
that he could not now with his honour so unrip and
in a sort put a lie upon all that he had said and done
before, as to deliver him up to his enemies. The
Bishop likewise (who had certain proud instructions
from the King,1 at the least in the front, though there
were a pliant clause at the foot, that remitted all
to the Bishop's discretion, and required him2 by no
means to break off in ill terms,) after that he had
failed to obtain the delivery of Perkin, did move a
second point of his instructions ; which was, that the
Scottish King would give the King an interview in
person at Newcastle. But this being reported to the
Scottish King, his answer was, that he meant to treat
a peace, and not to go a begging for it. The Bishop
1 A copy of instructions answering this description, and dated at Shene,
5 July, 1497, may be seen in the Cotton MSS. Vesp. C. xvi. fo. 141. Ref-
erence is made in them to a previous treaty lately made at " Jenynhaugh "
(date not mentioned) in which it seems that certain offers were made by
the Earl of Angus and Lord Home, which could not be accepted, — ap-
parently because they did not include the delivery of Perkin into Henry's
hands. It is possible that Fox had similar instructions for his guidance
in that previous negotiation, and that it was that which ended in the " re-
cv-s " which Bacon speaks of; during which James took occasion to send
Perkin away. For it was on the 6th of July, according to Tytler (iv. p.
385.), that he sailed: therefore before the instructions of the 5th could
have been received.
- Etiam disertis verbis pracipiens.
280 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
also according to another article of his instructions,
demanded restitution of the spoils taken by the Scot-
tish, or damages for the same. But the Scottish com-
missioners answered, that that was but as water
spilt upon the ground, which could not be gotten up
again ; and that the King's people were better able
to bear the loss than their master to repair it. But
in the end as persons capable of reason 1 on both sides,
they made rather a kind of recess than a breach of
treaty, and concluded upon a truce for some months
following.2 But the Kino; of Scotland, though he
would not formally retract his judgment of Perkin,
wherein he had engaged himself so far ; yet in his
private opinion, upon often speech with the English-
men and divers other advertisements, began to suspect
him for a counterfeit ; wherefore in a noble fashion
he called him unto him, and recounted the benefits
and favours that he had done him in making him his
ally, and in provoking a mighty and opulent King
by an offensive war in his quarrel, for the space of
two years together ; nay more, that he had refused an
honourable peace, whereof he had a fair offer if he
would have delivered him ; and that to keep his prom-
1 Moderati et rationi non recalcitrant es.
2 So Buchanan, xiii. 17. But the truce ''for some months " was prob-
ably the result of the previous negotiation at Jenynhaugh. By the time
Fox received the instimctions of the 5th of July, Perkin was gone and the
obstacle removed. The commissioners met, D'Ayala acting as a kind of
mediator, and agreed in the first instance upon a truce for seven years.
This was concluded on the 30th of September, 1497. Soon after a new
negotiation was commenced, D'Ayala acting on the part of James, and
Warham on the part of Henry; which ended in an extension of the term
to the lives of the two kings and a year after the death of the survivor.
It was signed by Warham in London on the 5th of December; proclaimed
in London the next day (see old Chronicle); and ratified by James on the
10th of February, 1497-8.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 281
ise with him, he had deeply offended both his nobles
and people, whom he might not hold in any long dis-
content : and therefore required him to think of his
own fortunes, and to choose out some fitter place for
his exile : telling him withal that he could not say but
the English had forsaken him before the Scottish ; for
that upon two several trials, none had declared them-
selves on his side : but nevertheless he would make
good what he said to him at his first receiving, which
was that he should not repent him for putting him-
self into his hands ; for that he would not cast him
off, but help him with shipping and means to trans-
port him where he should desire.
Perkin, not descending at all from his stage-like
greatness, answered the King in few words ; That he
saw his time was not yet come ; but whatsoever his
fortunes were, he should both think and speak honour
of the King. Taking his leave, he would not think
on Flanders, doubting it was but hollow ground for
him since the treaty of the Archduke concluded the
year before ; but took his lady, and such followers as
would not leave him, and sailed over into Ireland.
This twelfth year of the King a little before this
time,1 Pope Alexander, who loved best those Princes
that were furthest off and with whom he had least
to do ; and taking very thankfully the King's late
entrance into league for the defence of Italy ; did re-
munerate him with an hallowed sword and cap of
maintenance, sent by his Nuncio. Pope Innocent had
1 These words are omitted in the translation. If it was at Allhallow-
mass (1 Nov.) in the 12th year of the King, it was a good deal before the
time Bacon is speaking of. Henry's 12th year began on the 22nd of Au-
gust, 1496. We are now in July, 1497.
282 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
done the like, but it was not received in that glory.1
For the King appointed the Mayor and his brethren
to meet the Pope's orator at London-bridge, and all
the streets between the bridge-foot and the palace of
Paul's (where the King then lay) were garnished
with the citizens,2 standing in their liveries. And the
morrow after being Allhallown-day,3 the King, at-
tended with many of his prelates and4 nobles and
principal courtiers, went in procession to Paul's, and
the cap and sword were borne before him ; and after
the procession, the King himself remaining seated in
the quire, the Lord Archbishop upon the greese 5 of the
quire made a long oration ; setting forth the greatness
and eminency of that honour which the Pope (in these
ornaments and ensigns of benediction) had done the
King ; and how rarely and upon what high deserts
they used to be bestowed : and then recited the King's
principal acts and merits, which had made him appear
worthy in the eyes of his Holiness of this great honour.
All this while the rebellion of Cornwall (whereof
1 There was probably no account of the reception of the cap of main-
tenance sent by Pope Innocent in any of the histories to which Bacon had
access. But there is a full account of it in the Herald's journal (Cott.
Jul. B. xi. ; printed by Leland, vol. iv. p. 244.) and the arrangements were
much the same as those which Bacon proceeds to describe. So much so,
that if the old Chronicle from which his account is taken (Vitel. A. xvi.
f. 161.) had been lost and the Herald's journal preserved, one might have
suspected him of having mistaken the date. The former occasion was
in 1488.
2 The translation makes it part of the King's directions that the streets
should be thus garnished. Elenim rex nunc mandavit mojori dV. ut oratori
Papce, ad pedem pontis Londinensis obviam Jierent, atque platece universal inter
pontem et palatium episcopi Londinensis {ubi rex tunc hospitabatur) cicium
fraternitatibus, in sagulis suis vestitis, ulrinque clauderentur.
8 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " All-hallowes."
4 Ed. 1622 omits " and."
5 Super gradus ante chorum stans. Ed. 1622 has u greece."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 283
we have spoken) seemed to have no relation to Per-
kin ; save that perhaps Perkin's proclamation had
stricken upon the right vein, in promising to lay down
exactions and payments ; and so had made them now
and then have a kind thought on Perkin. But now
these bubbles by much stirring began to meet, as they
use to do upon the top of water. The King's lenity
(by that time the Cornish rebels, who were taken and
pardoned, and as it was said many of them sold by
them that had taken them for twelve pence and two
shillings apiece, were come down into their country)
had rather emboldened them than reclaimed them ; J
insomuch as they stuck 2 not to say to their neighbours
and countrymen that the King did well to pardon
them ; for that he knew he should leave few subjects
in England, if he hanged all that were of their mind :
and began whetting and inciting one another to renew
the commotion. Some of the subtlest of them, hear-
ing of Perkin's being in Ireland, found means to send
to him to let him know that if he would come over
to them they woutd serve him. When Perkin heard
this news, he began to take heart again, and advised
upon it with his counsel ; which were principally
three ; 3 Heme a mercer that had fled for debt ; Skel-
ton a taylor, and Astley a scrivener ; (for secretary
Frion was gone.) These told him that he was migh-
tily overseen both when he went into Kent and when
he went into Scotland ; the one being a place so near
1 This rather awkward sentence is more clearly expressed in the Latin.
Reyis dementia rebel/es Cornvbienses (poslqunm domum rediissent, sine poena
dimissi, verum ut diximus solidi unius nut duorum pretio redempti) mayis an-
iimn\rat quam sanaverat.
2 The MS has " stick."
8 Ex qiribus ires plurimum apud eum poterant.
284 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
London, and under the King's nose ; and the other a
nation so distasted with the people of England, that
if they had loved him never so well, yet they would
never have taken his part in that company. But if
he had been so happy as to have been in Cornwall at
the first, when the people began to take arms there,
he had been crowned at Westminster before this time :
for these Kings (as he had now experience) would sell
poor princes for shoes : but he must rely wholly upon
people ; and therefore advised him to sail over with all
possible speed into Cornwall : which accordingly he
did ; having in his company four small barks, with
some sixscore or sevenscore figh tins-men. He arrived
in September at Whitsand-Bay, and forthwith came
to Bodmin, the blacksmith's town ; 1 where there as-
sembled unto him to the number of three thousand
men of the rude people.
There he set forth a new proclamation, stroking the
people with fair promises, and humouring them with
invectives against the King and his government. And
as it fareth with smoke that never leeseth itself till it
be at the highest, he did now before his end raise his
stile, intitling himself no more Richard Duke of York,
but Richard the Fourth, King of England.2 His coun-
1 Michael Joseph. Oppidum fabri ferrarii de quo ante diximus.
2 These words from "he did now," are omitted in the translation;
where it is only said magnifice admodum de seipso loquebatur ; Bacon hav-
ing remembered, no doubt, or been reminded, that Perkin's Scotch proc-
lamation ran in the name of " Richard, by the grace of God, King of
England and of France, Lord of Ireland, Prince of Wales." He had been
misled by Speed, who speaks of that proclamation (p. 741.) as " made in
the name of Richard Duke of York; " and says afterwards that Perkin
after his landing in Cornwall, found means to raise thousands of people
"whom with most lavish promises, invective proclamations, and strong
impudency, he held together under the title of Richard the Fourth King of
England.'1''
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
285
sel advised him by all means to make himself master
of some good walled town ; as well to make his men
find the sweetness of rich spoils, and to allure to him
all loose and lost people by like hopes of booty ; as to
be a sure retreat to his forces, in case they should have
any ill day or unlucky chance in the field. Where-
fore they took heart to them, and went on and be-
sieged the city of Exeter,1 the principal town for
strength and wealth in those parts. When they were
comen before Exeter, they forebore to use any force
at the first, but made continual shouts and outcries to
terrify the inhabitants, and2 did likewise in divers
places call and talk to them from under the walls, to
join with them, and be of their party ; telling them
that the King3 would make them another London,
if they would be the first town that should acknowl-
edge him : but they had not the wit to send to them,
in any orderly fashion, agents or chosen men to tempt
them and to treat with them. The citizens on their
part shewed themselves stout and loyal subjects ; nei-
ther was there so much as any tumult or division
amongst them, but all prepared themselves for a val-
iant defence, and making good the town. For well
they saw that the rebels were of no such number or
power that they needed to fear them as yet : and well
they hoped that before their numbers increased the
King's succours would come in. And howsoever,
they thought it the extremest of evils to put them-
selves at the mercy of those hungry and disorderly
1 On Sunday, September 17. About 1 p. m. See Ellis's Letters, 1st
ser. vol. i. p. 34.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has a full stop after " inhabitants," and begins the
next sentence with " They."
8 Regem Rickardum.
286 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
people. Wherefore setting all things in good order
within the town, they nevertheless let down with
cords from several parts of the walls privily, several
messengers (that if one came to mischance another
might pass on), which should advertise the King of
the state of the town, and implore his aid. Perkin
also doubted that succours would come ere long, and
therefore resolved to use his utmost force to assault the
town. And for that purpose having mounted scaling-
ladders in divers places upon the walls, made at the
same instant an attempt to force one of the gates. But
having no artillery nor engines, and finding that he
could do no good by ramming with logs of timber, nor
by the use of iron bars and iron crows and such other
means at hand, he 1 had no way left him but to set one
of the gates on fire ; which he did. But the citizens
well perceiving the danger, before the gate could be
fully consumed, blocked up the gate and some space
about it on the inside with faggots and other fuel,
which they likewise set on fire, and so repulsed fire
with fire ; and in the mean time raised up rampiers of
earth, and cast up deep trenches, to serve instead of
wall and gate. And for the escaladaes, they had so bad
success, as the rebels were driven from the walls with
the loss of two hundred men.2
The King when he heard of Perkin's siege of Exe-
ter, made sport with it ; and said to them that were
about him, that the King of rake-hells was landed in
the west, and that he hoped now to have the honour
to see him, which he could never yet do. And it ap-
1 So Ed. 1622. MS. omits " he."
2 Above three or four hundred, according to King Henry. See Ellis's
Letters, 1st ser. vol. i. p. 34.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 287
peared plainly to those that were about the King, that
lie was indeed much joyed with the news of Perkin's
being in English ground, where he could have no
retreat by land ; thinking now, that he should be cured
of those-privy stitches, which he had had1 long about
his. heart, and had sometimes broken his sleeps in the
midst of all his felicity. And to set all men's hearts
on fire, he did by all possible means let it appear, that
those that should now do him service to make an end
of these troubles, should be no less accepted of him
than he that came upon the eleventh hour and had the
whole wages of the day. Therefore now, like the end
of a play, a great number came upon the stage at once.
He sent the Lord Chamberlain, and the Lord Brooke,
and Sir Rice ap Thomas, with expedite forces to speed
to Exeter to the rescue of the town, and to spread
e fame of his own following in person with a royal
y. The Earl of Devonshire and his son, with the
arews, and the Fulfordes and other principal persons
f Devonshire (uncalled from the court, but hearing
t the King's heart was so much bent upon this ser-
ce), made haste with troops that they had raised to
the first that should succour the city of Exeter, and
revent the King's succours. The Duke of Bucking-
m likewise with many brave gentlemen put them-
selves in arms, not staying either the * King's or Lord
I Chamberlain's2 coming on, but making a body of forces
of themselves, the more to endear their merit ; signify-
ing to the King their readiness, and desiring to know
his pleasure. So that according to the proverb, In the
coming down every Saint did help.
i So MS. In Ed. 1622 " had long had."
2 Ed. 1622 " the Lord Charaberlaines."
288 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Perkin hearing this thunder of arms and prepara-
tions against him from so many parts, raised his siege 1
and marched to Taunton, beginning already to squint
one eye upon the crown and another upon the sanctu-
ary ; though the Cornishmen were become like metal
often fired and quenched, churlish,2 and that would
sooner break than bow ; swearing and vowing not to
leave him till the uttermost drop of their blood were
spilt. He was at his rising from Exeter between six
and seven thousand strong, many having comen unto
him after he was set before Exeter, upon fame of so
great an enterprise, and to partake of the spoil ;
though upon the raising of the3 siege some did slip
away. When he was comen near Taunton, he dis-
sembled all fear ; and seemed all the day to use
diligence in preparing all things ready to fight. But
about midnight he fled with threescore horse to Bew-
ley4 in the New Forest; where he and divers of his
company registered themselves sanctuary-men, leaving
his Cornishmen to the four winds ; but yet thereby
easing them of their vow ; and using his wonted com-
passion, not to be by when his subjects blood should be
spilt. The King as soon as he heard of Perkin's flight,
sent presently five hundred horse to pursue and appre-
hend him, before he should get either to the sea or to
that same little island called a sanctuary. But they
came too late for the latter of these. Therefore all they
could do was to beset the sanctuary, and to maintain a
strong watch about it, till the King's pleasure were
1 On the 18th of September. See Ellis's Letters, 1st ser. vol. i. p. 34.
2 Obstinali.
8 So Ed. 1622. The MS. has "his siege."
4 On the 21st of September. See Ellis's Letters, 1st ser. vol. i. p. 34.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 289
further known. As for the rest of the rebels, they
( being destituted of their head) without stroke stricken
submitted themselves unto the King's mercy. And
the King who commonly drew blood (as physicians
do) rather to save life than to spill it, and was never
cruel when he was secure, now he saw the danger was
past, pardoned them all in the end ; except some few
desperate persons, which he reserved to be executed,
the better to set off his mercy towards the rest. There
were also sent with all speed some horse to Saint
Michael's Mount in Cornwall, where the Lady Kathe-
rine Gordon was left by her husband, whom in all for-
tunes she entirely loved ; adding the virtues of a wife
to the virtues of her sex. The King sent in the
greater diligence, not knowing whether she might be
with child, whereby the business would not have ended
in Perkin's person. When she was brought to the
King, it was commonly said that the King received her
lot only with compassion but with affection ; pity giv-
ing more impression to her excellent beauty. Where-
fore comforting her, to serve as well his eye as his
une, he sent her to his Queen, to remain with her ;
jiving her very honourable allowance for the support
)f her estate, which she enjoyed both during the
King's life and many years after. The name of the
White Rose, which had been given to her husband's
false title, was continued in common speech to her true
jauty.
The King went forwards on his journey, and made
a joyful entrance into Exeter,1 where he gave the citi-
1 It appears by an entry in the Privy Purse expences that Perkin was
brought to Taunton on the 5th of October, where the King was, on his
way to Exeter. He reached Exeter on the 7th.
VOL. xi. 19
290 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
zens great commendations and thanks ; and taking the
sword he wore from his side, he gave it to the Mayor,
and commanded it should be ever after carried before
him. There also he caused to be executed some of the
ringleaders of the Cornishmen, in sacrifice to the citi-
zens ; whom they had put in fear and trouble. At
Exeter the King consulted with his counsel, whether
he should offer life to Perkin if he would quit the sanc-
tuary and voluntarily submit himself. The counsel
were divided in opinion. Some advised the King to
take him out of sanctuary perforce, and to put him to
death, as in a case of necessity, which in itself dispens-
eth with consecrated places and things ; wherein they
doubted not also but the King should find the Pope
tractable to ratify his deed, either by declaration or at
least by indulgence. Others were of opinion, since all
was now safe and no further hurt could be done, that
it was not worth the exposing of the King to new
scandal and envy. A third sort fell upon the opinion1
that it was not possible for the King ever either to sat-
isfy the world well touching the imposture or to learn
out the bottom of the conspiracy, except by promise
of life and pardon and other fair means he should get
Perkin into his hands. But they did all in their pre-
ambles much bemoan the King's case, with a kind of
indignation at his fortune ; that a Prince of his high
wisdom and virtue should have been so long and so oft
exercised and vexed with idols. But the King said
that it was the vexation of God Almighty himself to
be vexed with idols, and therefore that that was not to
trouble any of his friends : and that for himself he al-
1 In the translation he says they distinctly advised him: regem diserte
prmmonebat.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 291
ways despised them, but was grieved that they had put
his people to such trouble and misery. But in conclu-
sion he leaned to the third opinion ; and so sent some
to deal with Perkin ; who seeing himself a prisoner
and destitute of all hopes, having tried princes and
people, great and small, and found all either false,
faint, or unfortunate, did gladly accept of the condi-
tion. The King did also while he was at Exeter ap-
point the Lord Darcy and others commissioners for the
fining of all such as were of any value,1 and had any
hand or partaking in the aid or comfort of Perkin or
the Cornishmen, either in the field or in the flight.
These commissioners proceeded with such strictness
and severity, as did much obscure the King's mercy in
sparing of blood, with the bleeding of so much treas-
ure. Perkin was brought unto the King's court, but
I not to the King's presence ; though the King to satisfy
his curiosity saw him sometimes out of a window 2 or
in passage. He was in shew at liberty, but guarded
with all care and watch that wras possible, and willed
to follow the King to London. But from his first ap-
pearance upon the stage in his new person of a syco-
phant or juggler, instead of his former person of a
Prince, all men may think how he was exposed to the
derision not only of the courtiers but also of the com-
mon people, who flocked about him as he went along,
(that one might know afar off where the owl was, by
the flight of birds ; some mocking, some wondering,
some cursing, some prying and picking matter out of
his countenance and gesture to talk of. So that the
1 The original return of the fines levied is preserved in the British Mn-
seum. See Ellis's Letters, 1st ser. vol. i. p. 38.
2 This is omitted in the translation.
292 HISTOEY OF KING HENRY VII.
false honour and respects which he had so long enjoyed
was plentifully repaid in scorn and contempt. As
soon as he was comen to London, the King gave also
the City the solace of this may-game. For he was
conveyed leisurely on horseback, but not in any igno-
minious fashion, through Cheapside and Cornhill1 to
the Tower, and from thence back again unto West-
minster, with the churmne 2 of a thousand taunts and
reproaches. But to amend the show, there followed a
little distance off Perkin, an inward counsellor of his,
one that had been serjeant farrier to the King. This
fellow, when Perkin took sanctuary, chose rather to
take an holy habit than a holy place, and clad himself
like an hermit, and in that weed wandered about the
country, till he was discovered and taken. But this
man was bound hand and foot upon the horse, and
came not back with Perkin, but was left at the
Tower,8 and within few days after executed. Soon
after, now that Perkin could tell better what himself
was, he was diligently examined ; and after his confes-
sion taken, an extract was made of such parts of them 4
as were thought fit to be divulged ; which was printed
and dispersed abroad : wherein the King did himself
no right : for as there was a laboured tale of particu-
lars of Perkin's father and mother and grandsire and
grandmother and uncles and cousins, by names and
surnames, and from what places he travelled up and
1 The MS. as well as the edition of 1622 has Corneivall; which is evi-
dently wrong. The Latin translation has Cornhill. This, according to
Stowe, was on the 20th of November, 1497 ; the 13th of the King.
2 Churm is an old Saxon word, meaning a confused murmuring noise.
In the translation cum choro is substituted.
8 These words are omitted in the translation.
4 So both MS. and Ed. 1622.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 293
down ; so there was little or nothing to purpose of any
tiling concerning his designs, or any practices that had
been held with him ; nor the Duchess of Burgundy
herself, that all the world did take knowledge of as the
personthat had put life and being into the whole busi-
ness, so much as named or pointed at ; J so that men
missing of that they looked for, looked about for they
knew not what, and were in more doubt than before.
But the King chose rather not to satisfy than to kindle
coals.2 At that time also it did not appear by any
new examinations or commitments that any other per-
son of quality was discovered or appeached, though
the King's closeness made that a doubt dormant.
About this time3 a great fire in the night-time sud-
denly began at the King's palace of Shyne, near unto
the King's own lodgings ; whereby a great part of the
building was consumed, with much costly household-
stuff; which gave the King occasion of building from
the ground that fine pile of Richmond, which is now
standing.
Somewhat before this time also, there fell out a
memorable accident. There was one Sebastian Ga-
bato, a Venetian, dwelling in Bristow, a man seen and
expert in cosmography and navigation. This man
seeing the success and emulating perhaps the enter-
prise of Christopherus Columbus in that fortunate dis-
covery towards the south-west, which had been by
him made some six years before,4 conceited with him-
1 The translation adds sed prorsus silentio ■prcetermissa.
2 Verum regi magis placebat vulgo non satisfacere quam grandium animos
irritare.
3 On St. Thomas's Day, at night, about nine o'clock. (Old Chron. fo.
171. &.).
4 Columbus saw the light on San Salvador on the 3rd of October, 1492
294 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
self that lands might likewise be discovered towards
the north-west. And surely it may be he had more
firm and pregnant conjectures of it than Columbus had
of his at the first. For the two great islands of the
old and new world, being in the shape and making of
them broad towards the north and pointed towards the
south, it is likely that the discovery first began where
the lands did nearest meet. And there had been be-
fore that time a discovery1 of some lands, which they
took to be islands, and were indeed the continent of
America, towards the north-west. And it may be,
that some relation of this nature coming afterwards to
the knowledge of Columbus, and by him suppressed
(desirous rather to make his enterprise the child of his
science and fortune than the follower of a former dis-
covery), did give him better assurance that all was not
sea from the west of Europe and Africke unto Asia,
than either Seneca's prophecy, or Plato's antiquities,
or the nature of the tides and land-winds and the like,
which were the conjectures that were given out where-
upon he should have relied : though I am not ignorant
that it was likewise laid unto the casual and wind-
beaten discovery a little before of a Spanish pilot who
died in the house of Columbus. But this Gabato
bearing the King in hand 2 that he would find out an
island endued with rich commodities, procured him to
man and victual a ship at Bristow for the discovery of
that island : with whom ventured also three small ships
(see Conquerors of the New World and their Bondsmen, vol. i. p. 100.); —
while Henry was arranging the treaty of Estaples.
1 Quin et memoria extabat aliquarum terrarum ad zephyr o-bor earn ante dis-
coopertarum et pro insidis habitarum ; quce tamen revera essent pars continen-
tis Americce borealis.
2 Regi Jldem faciens.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 295
of London merchants,1 fraught with some gross and
slight wares, fit for commerce with barbarous people.
He sailed, as he affirmed at his return (and made a
card thereof), very far westwards, with a quarter of
the nofth, on the north side of Terra de Labrador,
until he came to the latitude of sixty-seven degrees and
a half, finding the seas still open.2 It is certain also
1 " Which departed (says the old Chronicle, Vitel. A. xvi. p. 173) from
the west country in the beginning of summer; but to this present month
came never knowledge of their exploit."
This was in Henry's thirteenth year, — 1498. Stowe puts it on the four-
teenth; probably by an accidental misplacement of the A. R. in the mar-
gin. But it is very singular that neither of them takes any notice of
Sebastian Cabot's first voyage, which took place the year before, and
which had resulted in no less an " exploit " than the first discovery of the
North American continent. It was on the 24th of June, 1497, at five
o'clock in the morning, that they saw land first; at what exact point we
do not know; but apparently at some part of the coast of Labrador, with
an island not far off. The result of the expedition was known in England
in the beginning of August; for in the Privy Purse Expences of Henry
VII. we find an entry (p. 113.) of 10/. paid on the 10th of August, 1497,
" to him that found the new isle." And the second voyage of 1498 ap-
pears to have been undertaken with a view rather to settlement than dis-
covery, the commission (3rd Feb. 1497-8) having special reference to "the
Londe and Isles of late found." The fate of it (strange to say) is to this
day a matter of conjecture; but it is supposed to have been a failure.
For an elaborate discussion of all questions connected with this subject,
see "A Memoir of Sebastian Cabot; with a review of the History of Mar-
itime Discovery," 2nd ed. Lond. 1832. Compare also an account of a
paper in the Miscellanies of the Philobiblon Society, communicated by
Mr. Cheney, — in Notes and Queries, 2nd ser. No. 105, 2nd Jan. 1858.
The old Chronicle (it should be added) does not mention Sebastian
Cabot's name; but merely calls him "a stranger Venisian which by a
caart mad hym self expert in knowing of the world."
2 This statement comes, through Stowe, from " Sir Humphrey Gilbert's
Discovery for a new passage to Cataia; " whose authority appears to have
been a letter from Sebastian Cabot to Ramusio. But the date of the voy-
age in question is not given; and there is reason to believe that it took
place in 1511. See " Memoir of Cabot," p. 118. Perhaps the. three con-
tradictory statements as to the northernmost point reached by Cabot may
be best explained by supposing that in 1497 he sailed to the 56th degree,
in 1498 to the 58th, and in 1517 to the 67ith.
296 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
that the King's fortune had a tender of that great em-
pire of the West-Indies. Neither was it a refusal on
the King's part, but a delay by accident, that put by
so great an acquest. For Christopherus Columbus,
refused by the King of Portugal (who would not em-
brace at once both east and west), employed his
brother Bartholomeus Columbus unto King Henry to
negotiate for his discovery. And it so fortuned that
he was taken by pirates at sea ; by which accidental
impediment he was long ere he came to the King ; so
long, that before he had obtained a capitulation with
the King for his brother the enterprise by him was
achieved,1 and so the West-Indies by providence were
then reserved for the crown of Castilia. Yet this
sharpened the King so, that not only in this voyage,
but again in the sixteenth year of his reign, and like-
wise in the eighteenth thereof, he granted forth new
commissions for the discovery and investing of un-
known lands.
In this fourteenth year also,2 by God's wonderful
1 The translation says only that it was undertaken, meaning that Chris-
topher Columbus had made his arrangements with Ferdinand and Isabella.
Tarn diu ut priusquam cum rege Henrico transegisset expeditio ilia a f rat re
8W) Christophoro swcepta esset.
2 If there be no oversight here, we must conclude that Bacon (following
Stowe) supposed Sebastian Gabato's expedition to have taken place in
Henry's fourteenth year, that is between 22 August, 1498, and 21 August,
1499: in which case it must have been nearly a year after the events he
had been speaking of, instead of a little before. We do not indeed know
the exact date of the publication of Perkin's confession. But he was
shown in London at the end of November, 1497 ; in Henry's thirteenth
year; and his confession is represented as having been made "soon after."
The accident at Norham appears to have occurred in November, 1498 : for
on the 26th of that month the Sheriff of Northumberland was directed to
make proclamation summoning several persons, inhabitants of Ryddesdale
and Tyndale (northward), to appear within three days at Berwick before
Thomas Darcy, Knt., Lieutenant of the East and Middle marches towards
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 297
providence, that boweth things unto his will, and
bangeth great weights upon small wires, there fell out
a trifling and untoward accident, that drew on great
and happy effects. During the truce with Scotland,
there were certain Scottish young gentlemen that came
into Norham town, and there made merry with some
Scotland, to answer for murder committed on certain Scotchmen, contrary to
the peace between England and Scotland. (See Cal. Pat. Rolls, 14 Hen.
VII. pt. 1. p. 39.) The "peace " alluded to was no doubt the truce con-
cluded in December, 1497, and ratified by James on the 10th of February
following. (See note 2. p. 280.) The error as to the date of this accident
comes from Polydore Vergil; who begins his account of it (immediately
after relating the capture of Perkin at Exeter and the proceedings conse-
quent) with eodem anno.
The season of quiet which followed the suppression of the insurrection
in Cornwall, the capture of Perkin, and the conclusion of this truce, was
taken advantage of by Henry, not only for quenching the embers of the
rebellion in England by examining, punishing, and pardoning; but also for
making an attempt to civilise Ireland. Sir Edward Poynings's Parliament,
iree years before, had extended the English statutes to Ireland. Henry
wished now to try whether English manners and customs could not be in-
luced likewise. Accordingly on the 28th of March, 1498, he commis-
ioned the Earl of Kildare to summon a Parliament for the purpose of
iking into consideration, among other things, measures for prohibiting
ibsenteeism, except for purposes of education ; — for causing the English
Iress to be worn and English weapons used; — for enforcing the cleansing
towns, ditching, draining, paving, &c; and for levying customs and
ier dues. It was proposed that the Lords in Parliament should wear
jbes as in England; that every Lord or other person having livelihood or
mefice worth 20 marks a year should " ride in a saddle after the English
lise; " and that merchants and others of that degree should wear gowns
id cloaks, instead of the usual " hucks and foldings." Provision was also
to be made for the election of a Justice (in absence of the Lieutenant) to
hold the Government during the interval. The reversal of the attainder
)f the Earl of Kildare by the English Parliament was to be ratified. And
'illiam Barry, commonly called Lord Barry, of Munster, and John
fater, of Cork, merchant, having of late received divers letters from
Parkyn Wosebek" and treasonably concealed the same from the King
id his Council, were to be attainted of high treason.
Such was to be the principal business of this Parliament, as detailed in
the Calendar of Patent Rolls, 13 Hen. VII. p. 33. What was done, and
rith what success, I do not know. No mention is made of it in the Eng-
lish histories.
298 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
of the English of the town ; and having little to do,
went sometimes forth, and wonld stand looking upon
the castle. Some of the garrison of the castle, observ-
ing this their doing twice or thrice, and having not
their minds purged of the late ill blood of hostility,
either suspected them or quarelled 1 them for spies.
Whereupon they fell at ill words, and from words to
blows, so that many were wounded of either side ; and
the Scottishmen, being strangers 2 in the town, had the
worst ; insomuch that some of them were slain, and
the rest made haste home. The matter being com-
plained on, and often debated before the Wardens of
Marches of both sides, and no good order taken, the
King of Scotland took it to himself,3 and being much
kindled, sent a herald to the King to make protestation
that if reparation were not done, according to the con-
ditions of the truce,4 his King did denounce war. The
King, who had often tried fortune and was inclined
to peace, made answer that what had been done was
utterly against his will and without his privity ; but if
the garrison soldiers had been in fault, he would see
them punished ; and the truce in all points to be pre-
served. But this answer seemed to the Scottish King
but a delay, to make the complaint breathe out with
time ; and therefore it did rather exasperate him than
satisfy him. Bishop Foxe, understanding from the
King that the Scottish King was still discontent and
impatient, being troubled that the occasion of breaking
the truce should grow from his men, sent many hum-
1 Calumniabantur.
2 The translation adds uti verisimile est.
8 In suam contumeliam factum esse interpretatus est.
4 This clause is omitted in the translation.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 299
ble and deprecatory letters to the Scottish King to
appease him. Whereupon King James, mollified by
the Bishop's submiss and eloquent letters, writ back
unto him, that though he were in part moved by his
letters^yet he should not be fully satisfied except he
spake with him ; as well about the compounding of
the present differences, as about other matters that
might concern the good of both kingdoms. The
Bishop, advising first with the King, took his journey
for Scotland. The meeting was at Melrosse, an abbey
of the Cistercians, where the King then abode. The
King first roundly uttered unto the Bishop his offence
conceived for the insolent breach of truce by his men
of Norham-castle : whereunto Bishop Foxe made such
an humble and smooth answer, as it was like oil into
the wound, whereby it began to heal. And this was
done in the presence of the King and his counsel.
After the King spake with the bishop apart, and
opened himself unto him, saying that these tempo-
rary truces and peaces were soon made and soon
broken ; but that he desired a straiter amity with the
King of England ; discovering his mind, that if the
King would give him in marriage the Lady Margaret,
his eldest daughter, that indeed might be a knot in-
dissoluble : that he knew well what place and author-
ity the Bishop deservedly had with his master : there-
fore if he would take the business to heart and deal
in it effectually, he doubted not but it would succeed
well. The Bishop answered soberly, that he thought
himself rather happy than worthy to be an instrument
in such a matter, but would do his best endeavour.
Wherefore the Bishop returning to the King and giv-
ing him account of what had passed and finding the
300 HISTORY OF DBG 11KNKY VII.
King more than well disposed in it,1 gave the King
advice, first to proceed to a conclusion of peace, and
then to go on with the treaty of marriage by degr
Hereupon a peace was concluded, which n\;is published
a little before Christmas,8 in the fourteenth year of
the King's reign, to continue for both the Kings' lives
and the over-liver of them and a year after. In this
peace there was an article contained. That no Eng-
lishman should enter into Scotland, and no Scottish-
man into England, without letters commendatory from
the Kings of either nation. This at the first sight
might seem a means to continue a strangeness between
the nations : but it was done to lock in the bordeiv
This year there was also born to the King a third
son, who was christened by the name of Edmond,
and shortly after died.4 And much about the same
time came news of the death of Charles the French
Kincr:6 for whom there were celebrated solemn and
princely obsequies.
It was not long but Perkin, who was made of quick-
silver (which is hard to hold or imprison), began to
1 Prcpensum tt fere cupidum. There was a commission for treating on
the subject of this match granted by Henry in the summer of 1496. But
I suppose it did not come to actual negotiation at that time, as James was
then preparing to invade England with Perkin.
a I think this is a mistake. The former treaty (see note 2. p. 280.) was
published a little before Christmas, 1497. The treaty now in quest
which contaius the article concerning the letters commendatory (Rymer
xii. 724), was not concluded till the 12th July, 1499. It was ratifiY
James on the 20th, at Strivelin, and immediately after, that is on the 11th
of September, a commission was granted to Bishop Fox to treat of the
marriage.
8 Ad Umitaneos coercendos, qui dissidiorvm causa esse consueverant.
* He was christened on the 24th February A° 14 [1498-9] and died on
the Friday after Whitsunday, A0 15; which would be the 12th of June,
1500. (Old Chron. fo. 174 k and 181.)
* The news arrived in London in April, 1498. (Old Chron. fa 172.)
KING HENRY VII.
stir. For deceiving his keepers,1 he took him to his
heel-, and made speed to the sea-coast.2 But pres-
ently all corners were laid for him, and such diligent
pursuit and search made, as he was fain to turn back
and get him to the house of Bethleem, called the Pri-
ory of Shyne (which had the privilege of sanctuary),
and put himself into the hands of the Prior of that
monastery. The Prior was thought an holy man,
and much reverenced in those days. He came to the
King and besought the King for Perkin's Hfe only,
leavincr him otherwise to the King's discretion. Many
about the King were again more hot than ever to have
the King to take him forth and hang him. But the
King that had an high stomach and could not hate
any that he despised, bid take him forth and set the
knave in the stocks. And so promising the Prior his
life, he caused him to be brought forth. And within
two or three days after,3 upon a scaffold set up in the
palace-court at Westminster, he was fettered and set
in the stocks for the whole day. And the next day
after, the like was done by him at the cross in Cheap-
side, and in both places he read his confession of which
we made mention before ; and was from Cheapside
conveyed and laid up in the Tower. Notwithstand-
ing all this the King was (as was partly touched be-
fore) grown to be such a partner with fortune, as no
body could tell what actions the one and what the
other owned. For it was believed generally that Per-
kin was betrayed ; and that this escape was not with-
1 1 suppose he was tinder what they call smrvaUanee ; for according to
the Chronicle (fo. 173), the King u kept him in his Court at liberty."
m Trinity Sunday even, upon Saturday the 9th of Jane," 1498.
(Old Chron. f. 172.)
« u On the Friday next following." Id. fo. 172. b.
302 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
out the King's privity, who had him all the time of
his flight in a line ; and that the King did this to
pick a quarrel to him, to put him to death, and to be
rid of him at once ; which is not probable ; 1 for that
the same instruments who observed him in his flight
might have kept him from getting into sanctuary.
But it was ordained that this winding-ivy of a Plan-
tagenet should kill the true tree itself. For Perkin
after he had been a while in the Tower, began to in-
sinuate himself into the favour and kindness of his
keepers ; servants to the Lieutenant of the Tower Sir
John Digby ; being four in number ; Strange ways,
Blewet, Astwood, and Long-Roger. These varlets
with mountains of promises he sought to corrupt, to
obtain his escape. But knowing well that his own
fortunes were made so contemptible as he could feed
no man's hopes ; and by hopes he must work, for
rewards he had none ; he had contrived with himself
a vast and tragical plot ; which was, to draw into his
company Edward Plantagenet Earl of Warwick, then
prisoner in the Tower, whom the weary life of a long
imprisonment, and the often and renewing fears of
being put to death, had softened to take any impres-
sion of counsel for his liberty. This young Prince he
thought these servants would look upon, though not
upon himself. And therefore after that by some
message by one or two of them he had tasted of the
Earl's consent, it was agreed that these four should
murder their master the Lieutenant secretly in the
night, and make their best of such money and porta-
ble goods of his as they should find ready at hand ;
and get the keys of the Tower, and presently to let
i So MS. Ed. 1622 has : " But this is not probable."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
303
forth Perkin and the Earl. But this conspiracy was
revealed in time before it could be executed. And in
this again the opinion of the King's great wisdom did
surcharge him with a sinister fame, that Perkin was
but his bait to entrap the Earl of Warwick. And in
the very instant while this conspiracy was in working
(as if that also had been the King's industry) it was
fatal that there should break forth a counterfeit Earl
of Warwick, a cordwainer's son, whose name was
Ralph Wilford, a young man taught and set on by
an Augustin Friar called Patrick. They both from
the parts of Suffolk came forwards into Kent, where
they did not only privily and underhand give out that
this Wilford was the true Earl of Warwick ; but also
the friar, finding some light credence in the people,
took the boldness in the pulpit to declare as much,
and to incite the people to come in to his aid. Where-
upon they were both presently apprehended, and the
young fellow executed,1 and the friar condemned to
perpetual imprisonment. This also happening so op-
portunely to represent the danger to the King's estate
from the Earl of Warwick, and thereby to colour the
King's severity that followed ; together with the mad-
ness of the friar, so vainly and desperately to divulge
a treason before it had gotten any manner of strength ;
and the saving of the friar's life, which nevertheless
was indeed but the privilege of his order; and the
pity in the common people (which if it run in a strong
stream doth ever cast up scandal and envy), made it
generally rather talked than believed that all was but
the King's device. But howsoever it were, hereupon
1 He was hanged on Shrove-Tuesday, which in 1498-9 fell on the 13th
of February. Old Chron. fo'. 174. b. and Speed.
304 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Perkin (that had offended against grace now the third
time) was at the last proceeded with, and by commis-
sioners of Oyer and Determiner arraigned at West-
minster,1 upon divers treasons committed and perpe-
trated after his coming on land within this kingdom
(for so the judges advised, for that he was a foreigner),
and condemned ; and a few days after executed at
Tyburn ; where he did again openly read his confes-
sion, and take it upon his death to be true. This was
the end of this little cockatrice of a King, that was
able to destroy those that did not espy him first. It
was one of the longest plays of that kind that hath
been in memory, and might perhaps have had another
end, if he had not met with a King both wise, stout,
and fortunate.
As for Perkin's three counsellors, they had regis-
tered themselves sanctuary-men, when their master
did ; and whether upon pardon obtained or continu-
ance within the privilege, they came not to be pro-
ceeded with.
There was executed with Perkin the Mayor of Cork
and his son, who had been principal abettors of his
treasons. And soon after were likewise condemned
eight other persons about the Tower-conspiracy ;
whereof four were the Lieutenant's men. But of
those eight but two were executed.2 And immedi-
ately after was arraigned before the Earl of Oxford
(then for the time High Steward of England) the
poor Prince the Earl of Warwick ; not for the attempt
to escape simply, for that was not acted ; and besides
the imprisonment not being for treason, the escape
1 On the 16th of November, 1499.
2 This is omitted in the translation.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 305
by law could not be treason ; but for conspiring with
Perk in to raise sedition, and to destroy the King.
And the Earl confessing the indictment had judgment,
and was shortly after beheaded on Tower-hill.1
This "was also the end not only of this noble and
coinmiserable 2 person Edward the Earl of Warwick,
eldest son to the Duke of Clarence, but likewise of the
line-male of the Plantagenets, which had flourished in
great royalty and renown from the time of the famous
King of England, King Henry the Second. How-
beit it was a race often dipped in their own blood.
It hath remained since, only transplanted into other
names, as well of the imperial line as of other noble
houses. But it was neither guilt of crime, nor reason
of state, that could quench the envy that was upon the
King for this execution. So that he thought good to
sxport it out of the land, and to lay it upon his new
ly Ferdinando King of Spain. For these two Kings
nderstanding one another at half a word, so it was
:hat there were letters shewed out of Spain, whereby
the passages concerning the treaty of the marriage,
erdinando had written to the King in plain terms that
ie saw no assurance of his succession as long as the
iarl of Warwick lived ; and that he was loth to send
is daughter to troubles and dangers. But hereby as
the King did in some part remove the envy from him-
self, so he did not observe that he did withal bring a
kind of malediction and infausting upon the marriage,
as an ill prognostic ; which in event so far proved true,
I as both Prince Arthur enjoyed a very small time after
1 He was arraigned on the 19th and beheaded on the 29th of November.
For a statement of the grounds of the arraignment, see Statutes of the
Realm, p. 685. 1. 7.
2 Vere commiserabilis.
vol. xi. 20
306 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
the marriage ; and the Lady Katherine herself (a sad
and a religious woman) long after, when King Henry
the Eighth his resolution of a divorce from her was
first made known to her, used some words, that she
had not offended, but it was a judgment of God, for
that her former marriage was made in blood ; meaning
that of the Earl of Warwick.1
1 Sir James Mackintosh construes these remarks, coupled with another
a little further on (see note 2. p. 317), into a reluctant admission (for he
chooses to regard everything that Bacon mentions to Henry's disadvantage
as a reluctant admission) that the execution of Warwick had been deter-
mined on beforehand between Henry and Ferdinand, and that his offence
was the result of a snare laid by Henry in order to bring it about. It does
not seem to me that Bacon believed so much as this, or that the evidence
requires us to believe it. Bacon appears to have thought that Henry's
real motive for this unjustifiable severity was state-policy: the desire to
put an end at last to these dangers and troubles; that the laying it upon
Ferdinand was a prttext, to shift the unpopularity of the act from himself;
and that Ferdinand, understanding the case and having himself an interest
in it, had been willing to play into his hands and provide him with this
pretext in case he should want it; which it was obvious that he very
likely might. As long as a male representative of the house of York
lived, Yorkist conspiracies were continually hatching against Henry, upon
various pretences, but always with the one ultimate aim of reinstating the
true heir on the throne. Whatever impostor might be put forward for
convenience, it was in the true heir alone that the hopes of all the con-
spirators could meet and rest, and the chances therefore were that he
would sooner or later be drawn into some plot which would involve him in
a charge of treason. The question would then arise whether in such a
case as Warwick's — a case so extremely cruel and unjust — the rigour
of the law could be allowed to take its course. That it would be con-
venient it should, it is idle to deny. What Ferdinand is represented to
have said was quite true: as long as the Earl of Warwick lived, the suc-
cession was not secure. That in the course of a negotiation for the mar-
riage of his daughter he should put this fact strongly forward as a set-off
against the advantages of the match, was natural and no way wrong: it
was a very material objection. This would of itself account for the occur-
rence of such passages in his letters as are said to have been shown after
the execution of Warwick; and would of itself bear out the whole of Ba-
con's statement as to the facts. The expression "understanding each
other at half a word " does indeed imply something more as to Bacon's
opinion. It implies an impression on his mind that there had been some
collusion between the two Kings on the subject; that Ferdinand had done
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 307
This fifteenth year of the King, there was a great
plague both in London and in divers parts of the king-
dom. Wherefore the King after often change of places,
whether to avoid the danger of the sickness, or to give
more than merely urge this point in his letters as making against the eligi-
bility of the match (which he might certainly have done without any
blame); that he had foreseen the use which Henry might make of such
a pretext if he should have occasion to use unpopular severity towards
Warwick, and had therefore the rather dwelt upon it.
Bacon may have had grounds for such an impression, independent of the
rumour mentioned in the old histories. He may very likely have seen the
letters he speaks of. But I do not think we are at liberty to conclude that
his opinion went further than this. If he had believed as much as Sir
James Mackintosh supposes him to admit, it is difficult to see why he did
not adopt the narrative of Speed, who not only represents Warwick as
entrapped into the conspiracy, but connects the plea for entrapping him
with the case of Ralph Wilford that has just been mentioned: a theory
with which, if other circumstances corroborated it, the dates suit very
well. Wilford's conspiracy was in February, 1498-9. " This new device
(says Speed) to uncrown King Henry so wakened his own fears and the
eyes of the Castilians (who had secretly agreed to marry their princess
Katherine to our prince Arthur) that there seemed no sure ground of suc-
cession if that the Earl of Warwick were not made away. .
But oh the narrow capacities of the most seeing men; the confidence
reqf did undoubtedly lead this King (herein not justifiable, howsoever ex-
able in respect of human frailty, which might propound to itself many
ears and respects both public and private) to connive at the plotted death, or
rather formal murder, of this harmless gentleman, whose wrong may yet
move the hardest to compassion, as it afterwards stirred God in justice to
revenge, prospering no part of that great work which was therefore thus
corruptly sought to be perpetuated." This is the "sinister fame" which
Bacon mentions as having been current at the time, but not as believed by
himself; as having been naturally suggested by that singular sequence of
events; but not as being the true explanation of them. It may easily be
pposed that Bacon and Speed had the very same evidence before them,
t drew different conclusions from it.
My own difficulty is to understand how Henry could expect to relieve
himself from any part of the odium of the business by laying it upon
Ferdinand. One would think that the avowal of such a motive would
only have made the act more odious than ever. But I suppose Ferdinand,
being a great man and in alliance with England against France, was a
popular favourite in England, and the match was popular; and the people,
with true popular partiality, were disposed to excuse in the one the same
crime which they abhorred in the other.
DUt
whe
cus;
fear
\s
308 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
occasion of an interview with the Archduke, or both,
sailed over with his Queen to Calais. Upon his com-
ing thither the Archduke sent an honourable ambas-
sage unto him, as well to welcome him into those parts,
as to let him know that if it pleased him he would
come and do him reverence. But it was said withal,
that the King might be pleased to appoint some place
that were out of any walled town or fortress, for that
he had denied the same upon like occasion to the
French King. And though he said he made a great
difference between the two Kings, yet he would be loth
to give a precedent, that might make it after to be ex-
pected at his hands by another whom he trusted less.
The King accepted of the courtesy, and admitted of his
excuse, and appointed the place to be at Saint Peter's
Church without Calais. But withal he did visit the
Archduke with ambassadors sent from himself, which
were the Lord St. John and the secretary, unto whom
the Archduke did the honour as (going to mass at St.
Omer's) to set the Lord Saint John on his right hand
and the secretary on his left, and so to ride between
them to church. The day appointed for the interview
the King went on horseback some distance from Saint
Peter's Church to receive the Archduke. And upon
their approaching, the Archduke made haste to light,
and offered to hold the King's stirrup at his alight-
ing, which he l would not permit, but descending from
horseback they embraced with great affection. And
withdrawing into the church to a place prepared,
they had long conference, not only upon the con-
firmation of former treaties,2 and the freeing of com-
1 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " which the King would not," &c.
2 Some new regulations concerning the packers of wool, &c, and the
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 309
merce,1 but upon cross-marriages to be had between the
Duke of York the King's second son, and the Arch-
duke's daughter ; and again between Charles the Arch-
duke's son and heir, and Mary the King's second daugh-
ter. But these blossoms of unripe marriages were but
of2 friendly wishes, and the airs of loving entertain-
ment ; though one of them came afterwards to a con-
clusion 3 in treaty, though not in effect. But during the
time that the two Princes conversed and communed to-
gether in the suburbs of Calais, the demonstrations on
both sides were passing hearty and affectionate ; espe-
cially on the part of the Archduke ; who (besides that
he was a Prince of an excellent good nature) being
conscious to himself how drily4 the King had been
used by his counsel in the matter of Perkin, did strive
by all means to recover it in the King's affection.
And having also his ears continually beaten with the
counsels of his father and father-in-law, who in respect
of their jealous hatred against the French King did
always advise the Archduke to anchor himself upon
the amity of King Henry of England, was glad upon
this occasion to put in ure and practice their precepts :
calling the King patron, and father, and protector,
(these very words the King repeats, when he certified
sale of English cloths at Antwerp and Barugh, in the Archduke's domin-
ions, had been agreed upon between Henry and Philip in the spring of
1499. The sheriffs were directed to proclaim it on the 29th of May of that
year. See Cal. Pat. Rolls, 14 Hen. VII. fo. 8. p. 26.
1 So Ed. 1622. The MS. has " comen," but a blank space is left be-
tween the n and the comma which follows, as if the transcriber had felt
that it was not the right word, and left that space for the insertion of the
>per letter at the end.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 omits " of."
« So MS. Ed. 1622 has " to conclusion." The treaty alluded to was
for a marriage between Charles and Mary.
* Moi'ose etparum amanter.
310 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
of the loving behaviour of the Archduke to the city,1)
and what else he could devise to express his love and
observance to the King. There came also to the King
the Governor of Picardy and the Bailiff of Amiens,
sent from Lewis the French King to do him honour,
and to give him knowledge of his victory and winning
of the duchy of Milan. It seemeth the King was well
pleased with the honours he received from those parts,
while he was at Calais ; for he did himself certify all
the news and occurrents of them in every particular
from Calais to the Mayor and Aldermen of London,
which no doubt made no small talk in the City. For
the King, though he could not entertain the good-will
of the citizens as Edward the Fourth did, yet by affa-
bility and other princely graces did ever make very
much of them, and apply himself to them.
This year also died John Morton,2 Archbishop of
Canterbury, Chancellor of England, and Cardinal.
He was a wise man and an eloquent, but in his na-
ture harsh and haughty, much accepted by the King,
but envied by the nobility and hated of the people.
1 Lileris suis postea inseruil ad civilatem Londini missis, quibus humanitatem
Archiducis prolixe commendavit.
There is a copy of this letter in the old Chronicle (Vitel. A. xvi. fo. 178.
b.) from which most of the particulars here given may have been taken.
The chief difference is in a thing of very small importance — the sequence
of the two embassies; which Bacon appears to have inverted. According
to the King's letter, his embassy to the Archduke which was received
with such distinction at St. Omer's was prior to the Archduke's message
mentioned above. Henry's embassy was sent in acknowledgment of some
former embassy of the Archduke's; the Archduke's message in acknowl-
edgment of this. The King's letter is dated Calais, June 2 ; and was writ-
ten before his personal interview with the Archduke: which was to be on
the Monday or Tuesday in Whitsun week. i. e. the 8th or 9th of June.
2 In the beginning of October, according to the old Chronicle, p. 181. b.
Reckoning by the years of the King's reign, it should have been not this
year, but the next, the 16th.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 311
Neither was his name left out of Perkin's proclama-
tion ] for any good will ; but they would not bring him
in amongst the King's casting counters, because he had
the image and superscription upon him of the Pope, in
his honour of Cardinal. He wanne the King with
secrecy and diligence, but chiefly because he was his
old servant in his less fortunes, and also for that in
his affections he was not without an inveterate malice
against the house of York, under whom he had been in
trouble. He was willing also to take envy from the
King more than the King was willing to put upon
him. For the King cared not for subterfuges, but
would stand envy, and appear in any thing that was
to his mind ; which made envy still grow upon him ;
more universal, but less daring. But in the matter of
exactions, time did after shew that the Bishop in feed-
ing the King's humour did rather temper it. He had
been by Richard the Third committed as in custody to
the Duke of Buckingham, whom he did secretly incite
to revolt from King Richard. But after the Duke was
engaged, and thought the Bishop should have been his
chief pilot in the tempest, the Bishop was gotten into
the cock-boat, and fled over beyond seas. But what-
soever else was in the man,2 he deserveth a most happy
memory, in that he was the principal means of joining
the two Roses. He died of great years, but of strong
health and powers.3
1 Neque ex benevolentid aliqud nomen ejus omissum est in catabgo adula-
torum regis quos edictum Perkini perstrinxit ; sed eum noluerunl cum reliqui»
admiscere quoniam, &c.
2 Utcumque iste vir laudandus aut reprehendendus occurrat.
8 Corpore validus el animi facultatibus integris.
The old Chronicle says that he died " passing the years of fourscore and
odd."
312 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
The next year, which was the sixteenth year of the
King and the year of our Lord one thousand five hun-
dred, was the year of jubilee at Rome.1 But Pope
Alexander, to save the hazard and charges of men's
journeys to Rome, thought good to make over those
graces by exchange to such as would pay a convenient
rate, seeing they could not come to fetch them.2 For
which purpose was sent into England Gasper Pons a
Spaniard, the Pope's commissioner, better chosen than
were the commissioners of Pope Leo afterwards em-
ployed for Germany ; for he carried the business with
great wisdom and semblance of holiness : insomuch as
he levied great sums of money within this land to the
Pope's use, with little or no scandal. It was thought 3
the King shared in the money. But it appeareth by a
letter4 which Cardinal Adrian, the King's pensioner,
writ to the King from Rome some few years after, that
1 The year of Jubilee extended from Christmas 1499, to Christmas 1500.
Therefore it coincided more nearly with the King's 15th year. Jasper
Pons came in 1499-1500.
2 Cum minus grave esset eos in patria quemque sua recipere.
8 Opinio prava increbuerat.
4 This letter or one to the same effect is still to be seen in the Cotton
collection. (Cleo. E. iii. fo. 164.) It contains the following passage;
probably the one of which Bacon was thinking, though it does not appear
to me to be quite decisive upon the point specially in question. " Dixi
et prcedicavi, quod est verum, vestram Majestalem solum fuisse inter omnes
Catholicos principes qui non solum admisitpro sede Apostolica dictas cruciatas
et subsidia, sed etiam antequam colligerentur de suis propriis pecumis 20a
millia scutorum auri sedi Apostolicce solvenda hie Romoe proemisisse et oratori
Apostolicce maqistro Pon deliberasse."
It appears from Henry's Privy Purse expences that on the 16th of Sep-
tember, 1502, there was " delivered to Gasper Pon the Pope's orator, by
the King's commandment, for and unto the Pope's use, 4000/." Nicolas's
Excerpt. Hist. p. 126.
Henry may possibly have repaid himself for this advance out of the
money raised by Pons : and thence may have arisen the report that he
shared in the money. I suppose it may easily have taken two years to
complete the collection.
ot
-
gra
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 313
this was not so. For this Cardinal, being to persuade
Pope Julius on the King's behalf to expedite the bull
of dispensation for the marriage between Prince Henry
d the Lady Katherine, finding the Pope difficile in
anting- thereof, doth use it as a principal argument
concerning the King's merit towards that see, that
he had touched none of those deniers which had been
levied by Pons in England. But that it might the
better appear (for the satisfaction of the common peo-
ple) that this was consecrate money, the same nuncio
brought unto the King a brief from the Pope, wherein
the King was exhorted and summoned to come in per-
son against the Turk. For that the Pope, out of the
care of an universal father, seeing almost under his
eyes the successes and progresses of that great enemy
of the faith,1 had had in the conclave, and with the
assistance of the ambassadors of foreign Princes, divers
consultations about an holy war and general expedition
of Christian Princes against the Turk. Wherein it
was agreed and thought fit, that the Hungarians,
Polonians, and Bohemians, should make a war upon
Thracia : the French and Spaniards upon Graecia ; and
that the Pope (willing to sacrifice himself in so good a
cause) in person, and in company of the King of Eng-
land, the Venetians, (and such other states as were
great in maritime power), would sail with a puissant
navy through the Mediterrane unto Constantinople.
And that to this end his Holiness had sent nuncios
to all Christian Princes, as well for a cessation of all
quarrels and differences amongst themselves, as for
1 " Also this year," says the old Chronicle, fo. 182., " come certain
tidings to the King that the Turk had gotten the town Modon and made
great destruction of the Christians."
314 HISTORY OF KING HENKY VII.
speedy preparations and contributions of forces and
treasure for this sacred enterprise. To this the King
(who understood well the court of Rome)1 made an
answer2 rather solemn than serious. Signifying that
no Prince on earth should be more forward and obe-
dient both by his person and by all his possible forces
and fortunes to enter into this sacred war than himself.
But that the distance of place was such, as no forces
that he should raise for the seas could be levied or
prepared but with double the charge and double the
time (at the least) that they might be from the other
Princes that had their territories nearer adjoining.
Besides, that neither the manner of his ships (having
no galleys) nor the experience of his pilots and mari-
ners could be so apt for those seas as theirs. And
therefore that his Holiness might do well to move one
of those other Kings, who lay fitter for the purpose, to
accompany him by sea, whereby both all things would
be sooner put in readiness, and with less charge ; and
the emulation and division of command which might
grow between those Kings of France and Spain,
if they should both join in the war by land upon
Graecia, might be wisely avoided. And that for his
part he would not be wanting in aids and contribu-
tion. Yet notwithstanding if both these Kings should
refuse, rather than his Holiness should go alone, he
would wait upon him as soon as he could be ready.
Always provided that he might first see all differences
of the Christian Princes amongst themselves fully laid
1 De animo et consiliis Papce bene informalus.
2 The answer may be read at length in Ellis's letters, 1st ser. vol. i.
p. 48; where it is printed from the original Cott. MSS. Cleo. E. iii. fo.
150. This which Bacon gives is only the substance of the business part
of it.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
315
down and appeased, (as for his own part he was in
none.) And that he might have some good towns
upon the coast in Italy put into his hands, for the re-
treat and safeguard of his men. With this answer
Gasper- Pons returned, nothing at all discontented.
And yet this declaration of the King (as superficial
as it was) gave him that reputation abroad, as he was
not long after elected by the Knights of the Rhodes
protector of their order ; all things multiplying to
honour in a prince that had gotten such high esti-
mation for his wisdom and sufficiency.1
There were these two last years some proceedings
against heretics, which was rare in this King's reign ;
and rather by penances than by fire.2 The King had
(though he were no good schoolman) the honour to
convert one of them 3 by dispute at Canterbury.
This year also, though the King were no more
haunted with sprites, for that by the sprinkling partly
of blood and partly of water he had chased them
away ; yet nevertheless he had certain apparitions
that troubled him : still shewing themselves from one
region, which was the house of York. It came so to
pass that the Earl of Suffolk, son to Elizabeth eldest
sister to King Edward the Fourth by John Duke of
Suffolk her second husband, and brother to John Earl
1 In rebus eivilibus peritice.
2 Et si aliquando contigerat, posnitentiis potius quam igne luebant.
3 This is recorded by the city Chronicler (p. 172.) who adds that he
"died a Christian man, whereof his Grace have great honour."
" The King (says Fuller) by what arguments we know not, converted
this priest and then presently gave order that he should be burned ; which
was done accordingly. Surely there was more in the matter than what
appeared in the record, or else one may boldly say that, if the King's con-
verts had no better encouragement, this was the first he made and the last
he was ever likely to make." Church History, iv. 15. 82.
316 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
of Lincoln, that was slain at Stokefield, being of a
hasty and choleric disposition, had killed a man in his
fury. Whereupon the King gave him his pardon, but
either willing to leave a cloud upon him or the better
to make him feel his grace, produced him openly to
plead his pardon. This wrought in the Earl, as in a
haughty stomach it useth to do. For the ignominy
printed deeper than the grace. Wherefore he being
discontent fled secretly into Flanders 1 unto his aunt
the Duchess of Burgundy. The King startled at it.
But being taught by troubles to use fair and timely
remedies, wrought so with him by messages (the Lady
Margaret also growing by often failing in her alchemy
weary of her experiments, and partly being a little
sweetened for that the King had not touched her name
in the confession of Perkin,) that he came over again
upon good terms, and was reconciled to the King.
In the beginning of the next year, being the seven-
teenth of the King, the Lady Katherine, fourth daugh-
ter of Ferdinando and Isabella, King and Queen of
Spain, arrived in England at Plymouth the second of
October, and was married to Prince Arthur in Paul's
the fourteenth of November following : the Prince
being then about fifteen years of age, and the lady
about eighteen.2 The manner of her receiving, the
1 In the month of August. Old Chron. fo. 183.
It seems the Earl had another ground of discontent. His elder brother
John had been attainted during the Duke their father's life; when the
Duke died Edmond claimed the honour and estate of his father. But
Henry persisted in considering him as the heir of his brother, and gave
him only the title of Earl, with a small portion of his patrimony ; — an
instance of the troubles Henry bred himself from his aversion to the House
of York.
2 So say both Stowe and Speed : but it seems to be a mistake. Miss
Strickland, on the authority of a Spanish MS. in the possession of Sir
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 817
manner of her entry into London, and the celebrity
oi the marriage, were performed with great and true
magnificence, in regard of cost, shew, and order.1 The
■lief man that took the care was Bishop Foxe, who
was nofc only a grave counsellor for war or peace, but
also a good surveyor of works, and a good master of
ceremonies, and any thing else that was fit for the
active part belonging to the service of court or state
of a great King. This marriage was almost seven
years in treaty, which was in part caused by the
tender years of the marriage-couple ; especially of
the Prince. But the true reason was that these two
Princes, being Princes of great policy and profound
judgment, stood a great time looking one upon an-
other's fortunes, how they would go ; 2 knowing well
Thomas Phillips, states that Katherine was born on the 15th of December,
1485: therefore was not quite sixteen at the time of her marriage.
1 See a full account of it in the old Chronicle, p. 183. b. — 201.
2 This is the passage referred to in note 1. p. 306. It is quoted by Sir
James Mackintosh as imputing to Henry and Ferdinand (clearly though
not directly) a "criminal agreement" for the removal of Warwick. He
could hardly, I think, have remembered his own admission that " history
ought to be written without passion," when he found such a meaning in
these words. Dr. Lingard's remark is more pertinent. " As almost three
years elapsed (he says) between the treaty of marriage and the con-
tract, this delay has been urged as a proof that Ferdinand would not con-
sent to it till he was assured that the life of the Earl of Warwick, the real
heir, would be taken by Henry. But the fact is that this was the earliest
period stipulated in the treaty (Rymer, xii. 663.), which provided that as
soon as Arthur had completed his twelfth year, the parents might, if they
pleased, apply to the Pope for a dispensation." This seems to be a suffi-
cient answer to Sir James Mackintosh's question " How came the espousal
by proxy to occur only six months before the execution of Warwick,
&c? " Arthur had not completed his twelfth year till September, 1498.
And if it be asked why this delay was provided for in the contract
(marriages between children being in such cases — where Kings were the
matchmakers and kingdoms the parties matched — not unusual), the
reason here assigned by Bacon — if the obvious rationality and decency
of the proceeding be not thought reason enough — is probably the true
318 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
that in the mean time the very treaty itself gave
abroad in the world a reputation of a strait conjunc-
tion and amity between them, which served on both
sides to many purposes that their several affairs re-
quired, and yet they continued still free. But in the
end, when the fortunes of both the Princes did grow
every day more and more prosperous and assured, and
one. As no good could be got by closing the question, they thought it
better to leave it open.
The thing which requires explanation is not the delay of the match, but
the resolution to expedite it. It was first agreed upon in general terms on
the 27th of March, 1489, before Arthur was three years old. On the 2nd
of November, 1491, Katherine's dowry was settled, and it was agreed that
she should be brought to England as soon as Arthur had completed his
fourteenth year. On the 22nd of September, 1496, it was further agreed
that as soon as the parties should be of " legitimate age " for it, the mar-
riage should be celebrated "per verba de prassenti." And on the first of
October following it was arranged that, if for any urgent cause it were
thought fit that the marriage should be celebrated per verba de praisenti as
soon as Arthur had completed his twelfth year, then the two Kings would
apply for a dispensation for that purpose. This I suppose was the treaty
in which D'Ayala was concerned. Henry seems to have been in no hurry
about it; for though concluded on the 1st of October, 1496, it was not
confirmed by him till the 18th July, 1497. On the 15th of the following
month the contract was solemnised at Woodstock as formally as it could
be without the Pope's dispensation and while the parties were under age.
The dispensation was granted in February, 1497-8. Arthur completed
his twelfth year in the following September. On the 12th of March,
1498-9, Katherine appointed her procurator. On the 19th of May the
marriage was solemnised by proxy. On the 20th of December the proxy
marriage was acknowledged by Katherine and approved by Ferdinand
and Isabella. On the 28th of May, 1500, the whole proceeding was for-
mally recited and ratified by Henry. And four months had still to pass
before the earliest time ever thought of for the actual union. If it be
asked why it was resolved to celebrate the proxy marriage sooner than
was originally intended (a resolution which seems to have been taken in
October, 1496), the answer is simple and obvious. By the original treaty,
Ferdinand had engaged to send his daughter to England at his own charge
as soon as Arthur had completed his fourteenth year; which would be
in September, 1500. And he naturally wished, before he commenced his
preparations for sending her, to have the contract made irrevocable and
indissoluble.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 319
that looking all about them they saw no better con-
ditions, they shut it up.
The marriage-money the Princess brought (which
was turned over to the King by act of renunciation)
was two •hundred thousand ducats : whereof one hun-
dred thousand were payable ten days after the solem-
nization, and the other hundred thousand at two pay-
ments annual ; but part of it to be in jewels and plate,
and a due course set down to have them justly and in-
differently priced.1 The jointure or advancement of
the lady, was the third part of the principality of
Wales, and of the dukedom of Cornwall, and of the
earldom of Chester ; to be after set forth in sever-
alty. And in case she came to be Queen of Eng-
land her advancement was left indefinite ; but thus ;
that it should be as great as ever any former Queen
of England had.
In all the devices and conceits of the triumphs of
this marriage, there was a great deal of astronomy.
The lady being resembled to Hesperus, and the Prince
to Arcturus ; and the old King Alphonsus (that was
the greatest astronomer of Kings and was ancestor to
the lady) was brought in to be the fortune-teller of
the match. And whosoever had those toys in com-
piling, they were not altogether pedantical. But you
may be sure that King Arthur the Briton, and the
descent of the Lady Katherine from the house of Lan-
ter, was in no wise forgotten. But as it should
seem, it is not good to fetch fortunes from the stars.
For this young Prince (that drew upon him at that
time not only the hopes and affections of his country,
but the eyes and expectation of foreigners) after a few
aes(
cast
320
months, in the beginning of April, deceased at Ludlow
Castle, where he was sent to keep his resiance and
court as Prince of Wales. Of this Prince, in respect
he died so young, and by reason of his father's manner
of education, that did cast no great lustre upon his
children, there is little particular memory. Only thus
much remaineth, that he was very studious and learn-
ed beyond his years, and beyond the custom of great
Princes.
There was a doubt ripped up in the times following,
when the divorce of King Henry the Eighth from the
Lady Katherine did so much busy the world, whether
Arthur was bedded with his lady or no, whereby that
matter in fact (of carnal knowledge) might be made
part of the case. And it is true that the lady herself
denied it, or at least her counsel stood upon it, and
would not blanch that advantage ; l although the pleni-
tude of the Pope's power of dispensing was the main
question. And this doubt was kept long open in re-
spect of the two Queens that succeeded, Mary and
Elizabeth, whose legitimations were incompatible one
with another ; though their succession was settled by
act of Parliament. And the times that favoured Queen
Mary's legitimation would have it believed that there
was no carnal knowledge between Arthur and Kath-
erine ; not that they would seem to derogate from the
Pope's absolute power to dispense even in that case ;
but only in point of honour, and to make the case
more favourable and smooth. And the times that
favoured Queen Elizabeth's legitimation (which were
the longer and the later) maintained the contrary.
So much there remaineth in memory ; thatit was half
1 Ut firmamentum cawce non contemnendum omitti noluisse.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 321
a year's time 1 between the creation of Henry Prince
of Wales and Prince Arthur's death ; which was con-
Itrned to be, for to expect a full time whereby it might
ifrpear whether the Lady Katherine were with child
»v PrimSe Arthur or no. Again the lady herself pro-
ired a bull for the better corroboration of the mar-
iage, with a clause of (yel forsan cognitam) which
ras not in the first bull. There was given in evi-
lence also when the cause of the divorce was handled,
pleasant passage,2 which was ; that in a morning
'rince Arthur upon his up-rising from bed with her
died for drink, which he was not accustomed to do,
id finding the gentleman of his chamber that brought
im the drink to smile at it and to note it, he said mer-
ily to him that he had been in the midst of Spain
diich was an hot region, and his journey had made
lim dry ; and that if the other had been in so hot a
lime he would have been drier than he. Besides the
'rince was upon the point of sixteen years of age3
dien he died, and forward, and able in body.
The February following, Henry Duke of York was
ited Prince of Wales, and Earl of Chester and
lint. For the dukedom of Cornwall devolved to
him by statute. The King also being fast-handed4
and loth to part with a second dowry, but chiefly
being affectionate both by his nature and out of politic
1 Nearly a year. Prince Arthur died about the 2nd of April, 1502.
Prince Henry was created Prince of Wales on the 18th of February
following.
2 Scomma quoddam facelum.
8 About fifteen and a half.
4 At rex ingenio tenax, et non libenter reditus novos, si alibi nupsisset Hen-
ricus, assignaturus ; sed prcecipue propter affectum suum, quo et natura et
jjropter rationes politicas Ferdinandum prosecutus est, affinitatis prioris con-
tinuandi cupidus, cfc.
VOL. XI. 21
322 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
considerations to continue the alliance with Spain, pre*
vailed with the Prince (though not without some rel-
uctation,1 such as could be in those years, for he was
not twelve years of age) to be contracted with the
Princess Katherine : the secret providence of God
ordaining that marriage to be the occasion of great
events and changes.
The same year were the espousals of James King of
Scotland with the Lady Margaret the King's eldest
daughter ; which was done by proxy, and published
at Paul's Cross, the five and twentieth of January,
and Te Deum solemnly sung. But certain it is, that
the joy of the City thereupon shewed, by ringing of
bells and bonfires and such other incense of the people,
was more than could be expected in a case of so great
and fresh enmity between the nations ; especially in
London, which was far enough off from feeling any of
1 Bacon's authority for this statement was probably Speed, who asserts
it, on the strength apparently of Prince Henry's protestation, made on the
27th of June, 1505, when he was just turned fourteen. According to Dr.
Lingard, however, this protestation was dictated by his father, and was
not intended to imply any objection on the part of young Henry to marry
Katherine, but only to leave him free. " The King assured Ferdinand
(says Lingard) that his only object was to free his son from all previous
obligation; he still wished to marry Katherine, but was also free to marry
any other Avoman." (Chap. 6. p. 329.) Dr. Lingard also represents the
proposition for this marriage as having come from Ferdinand and Isabella,
and as one on which Ferdinand was much bent: which Henry knew, and
kept the question open in order to engage him in furtherance of some
matrimonial projects of his own.
Sir Richard Morysine in his Apomaxis calumniarum, #c. (1537) states
that Henry himself afterwards, taking the failure of his own health and
the death of his Queen (quam merito suo unice deamabat) as intimations
of the divine displeasure at this contract, sent for his son, told him it was
wrong to think that God's laws were not God's laws when the Pope chose,
obtained a promise from him that he would not marry his brother's wid-
ow, and formally annulled the contract. And I believe that evidence in
confirmation of this statement has recently been discovered.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 323
the former calamities of the war : and therefore might
truly be attributed to a secret instinct and inspiring
(which many times runneth not only in the hearts
of Princes but in the pulse and veins of people) touch-
ing the" happiness thereby to ensue in time to come.
This marriage was in August following consummate at
Edinburgh : the King bringing his daughter as far as
Collyweston on the way ; and then consigning her to
the attendance of the Earl of Northumberland ; who
with a great troop of lords and ladies of honour
brought her into Scotland to the King her husband.
This marriage had been in treaty by the space of al-
most three years,1 from the time that the King of
Scotland did first open his mind to Bishop Foxe. The
sum given in marriage by the King was ten thousand
pounds : and the jointure and advancement assured by
the King of Scotland was two thousand pounds a year
ir King James his death, and one thousand pounds
year in present for the lady's allowance or mainten-
mce : this to be set forth in lands, of the best and most
?rtain revenue.2 During the treaty it is reported that
te King remitted the matter to his counsel, and that
iome of the table in the freedom of counsellors (the
ing being present) did put the case, — that if God
mould take the King's two sons without issue, that
then the kingdom of England would fall to the King
>f Scotland, which might prejudice the monarchy of
England. Whereunto the King hinlself replied ; That
that should be, Scotland would be but an accession
to England, and not England to Scotland ; for that the
1 Rather more than three years. Fox was formally commissioned to
treat of the marriage on the 11th September, 1499.
2 Qui redllus separandi erani ex proecipuis et certissimis reditibus.
324 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
greater would draw the less : and that it was a safer
union for England than that of France. This passed
as an oracle, and silenced those that moved the ques-
tion.
The same year was fatal as well for deaths as mar-
riages ; and that with equal temper. For the joys and
feasts of the two marriages were compensed with the
mournings and funerals of Prince Arthur (of whom
we have spoken), and of Queen Elizabeth, who died
in child-bed in the Tower, and the child lived not long
after. There died also that year Sir Reignold Bray,
who was noted to have had with the King the greatest
freedom of any counsellor ; but it was but a freedom
the better to set off flattery ; yet he bare more than
his just part of envy for the exactions.
At this time the King's estate was very prosperous :
secured by the amity of Scotland ; strengthened by
that of Spain ; cherished by that of Burgundy ; all
domestic troubles quenched ; and all noise of war (like
a thunder afar off) going upon Italy. Wherefore na-
ture, which many times is happily contained and re-
frained by some bands of fortune, began to take place *
in the King ; carrying as with a strong tide his affec-
tions and thoughts unto the gathering and heaping up
of treasure. And as Kings do more easily find instru-
ments for their will and humour than for their service
and honour, he had gotten for his purpose, or beyond
his purpose, two instruments, Empson and Dudley ;
whom the people esteemed as his horse-leeches and
shearers : bold men and careless of fame, and that
took toll of their master's grist. Dudley was of a
good family, eloquent, and one that could put hateful
1 Prcevalere et prcedominari effrcenis.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 325
business into good language. But Empson, that was
the son of a sieve-maker, triumphed always upon the
deed done ; * putting off' all other respects whatsoever.
These two persons being lawyers in science and privy
counsellors in authority, (as the corruption of the best
things is the worst) turned law and justice into worm-
wood and rapine. For first their manner was to cause
divers subjects to be indicted of sundry crimes ; and so
far forth to proceed in form of law ; but when the
bills were found, then presently to commit them ; and
nevertheless not to produce them in any reasonable
time 2 to their answer ; but to suffer them to languish
long in prison, and by sundry artificial devices and
terrors to extort from them great fines and ransoms,
which they termed compositions and mitigations.
Neither did they, towards the end, observe so much
as the half-face of justice,3 in proceeding by indict-
tent ; but sent forth their precepts to attach men and
jonvent them before themselves and some others at
teir private houses, in a court of commission ; 4 and
1 Factum semper urgebai deque eo triumphabat. He was satisfied, so he
)t the thing done, no matter how : an explanation which I should not
lave thought it worth while to add, but that Sir James Mackintosh (who
id a bad habit of altering Bacon's phraseology to suit his own ideas of
legance, even where he professes by inverted commas to quote the words)
lbstitutes " triumphed in his deeds: " an expression which throws the em-
jhasis so effectually on the wrong word that it may be said to miss all the
leaning.
2 Cum vero bilke impetitionis, quce vim tantum accusationis non decisionis
bebant, verce repertce fuerint, statim eos custodies tradere. Neque tamen
lusam juridicd via prosequebantur aut eos tempore convenienii ad se defen-
endum producebant, &c.
For " in any reasonable time " the Edition of 1622 has " to any reason-
ible time;" a misprint, I presume. The MS. has " in."
8 Quineliam usu audaciores facti, tandem tarn contemptim et incuriose pro-
:esserunl ut ne dimidiam Mam partem, &c.
* Colore scilicet commissionis sum.
326 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
there used to shuffle up a summary proceeding by ex-
amination,1 without trial of jury ; assuming to them-
selves there2 to deal both in pleas of the crown and
controversies civil.
Then did they also use to inthral and charge the
subjects' lands with tenures in capite? by finding false
offices,4 and thereby to work upon them for wardships,5
liveries, premier seisins,6 and alienations, (being the
fruits of those tenures) ; refusing (upon divers pre-
texts and delays) to admit men to traverse those
false offices, according to the law.
Nay the King's wards after they had accomplished
their full age could not be suffered to have livery of
their lands without paying excessive fines, far exceed-
ing all reasonable rates.
They did also vex men with information of intru-
sion,7 upon scarce colourable titles.
When men were outlawed 8 in personal actions, they
would not permit them to purchase their charters of
pardon, except they paid great and intolerable sums ;
standing upon the strict point of law, which upon ut-
lawries giveth forfeiture of goods. Nay contrary to
1 Via quadam justilice summaria et irregulari, per examinationem solam,
absque duodecim virorum judicio, causas terminabant.
2 In his justit'uB latebris.
8 Tenura immediata de corona, aut persona regis ; non de baronid aut prce-
dio superiore aut hujusmodi. (Ind. Vocab.)
* Falsas inquisitiones.
5 Jus, per quod custodia hmredum minoris aztatis, qui tenent per servitium
equitis, pertinet ad dominum. Id.
6 Jus, domino accrescens, ad summam pecuniae, quamprimum hasredes sint
plenai aitatis Id.
? De intrusione in terras regias . . . ex meris calumniis et praitextibus vix
probabilibus.
8 Utlegati : Proseripti ex formula legis, vel propter capitalia, vel propter
contemptum et contumaciam. (Ind. Voc.)
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 327
all law and colour, they maintained * the King ought
to have the half of men's lands and rents, during the
space of full two years, for a pain in case of utlawry.
They would also ruffle with jurors2 and inforce them
to find -as they would direct, and (if they did not)
convent them, imprison them, and fine them.
These and many other courses,3 fitter to be buried
than repeated, they had of preying upon the people ;
both like tame hawks for their master, and like wild
hawks for themselves ; insomuch as they grew to great
riches and substance. But their principal working4
was upon penal laws, wherein they spared none great
nor small ; nor considered whether the law were possi-
ble or impossible, in use or obsolete : but raked over
all old and new statutes ; though many of them were
made with intention rather of terror than of rigour ; 6
ever having a rabble of promoters, questmongers,
uid leading jurors 6 at their command ; so as they
mid have any thing found," either for fact or valu-
ition.
There remaineth to this day a report, that the King
ras on a time entertained by the Earl of Oxford (that
ras his principal servant both for war and peace)
lobly and sumptuously, at his castle at Henningham.
.nd at the King's going away, the Earl's servants
bood in a seemly manner in their livery coats with
)gnizances ranged on both sides, and made the King a
ine. The King called the Earl to him, and said, My
1 De proprio addebant.
2 Cum duodecim viris et juratoribus grandioribus minaciter agere.
8 Oppressiones et concussiones.
4 Prcecipuum autem eorum flagellum.
5 Quam ut sum-mo jure ageretur.
6 Juratorum pragmaticorum.
7 Veredicto exhiberi et confirmari.
328 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
lord, I have heard much of your hospitality, but I see
it is greater than the speech. These handsome gentle-
men and yeomen which I see on both sides of me are
(sure) your menial servants. The Earl smiled and
said, It may please your Grace, that were not for mine
ease. They are most of them my retainers,1 that are
comen to do me service at such a time as this, and
chiefly to see your Grace. The King started a little,
and said, By my faith, (my lord) I thank you for my
good cheer, but I may not endure to have my laws
broken in my sight. My attorney must speak with
you. And it is part of the report, that the Earl com-
pounded for no less than fifteen thousand marks.2
And to shew further the King's extreme diligence ; I
do remember to have seen Ion 2 since a book of ac-
compt of Empson's, that had the King's hand almost
to every leaf by way of signing, and was in some
places postilled in the margent with the King's hand
likewise, where was this remembrance.3
1 Famuli extraordinarii suis viventes impensis.
2 The King visited Lord Oxford on the 6th of August, 1498 (see Privy
Purse expenses of Hen. VII. p. 119.), on which occasion this may have
happened. A heavier fine for a similar offence was exacted from Lord
Abergavenny some years afterwards. In a memorandum of obligations
and sums of money received by Edmund Dudley for fines and duties to be
paid to the King, of which a copy is preserved in the Harleian collection
(1877, f. 47.), the following item appears as belonging to the 23rd year of
the reign : —
" Item : delivered three exemplifications tinder the seal of the L. of
King's Bench of the confession and condemnation of the Lord Burgavenny
for such retainers as he was indicted of in Kent; which amounteth unto
for his part only after the rate of the months 69,900Z."
It appears from the Calendar of Patent Rolls (23 Hen. VII. pt. 2. p. 18.)
that George Nevile, Knt., Lord Bergevenny received a pardon of all felo-
nies, offences against the forest laws, &c. on the 18th of February, 1507-8:
two months before Henry's death. Fabyan mentions his being committed
to the Tower " for a certain displeasure which concerned no treason *' in
May, 1506.
8 Memoriola ista Empsoni.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
329
Item, Received, of such a one, five marks, for a
pardon to be procured ; 1 and if the pardon do not
pass, the money to be repaid ; except the party
be some other ways satisfied.
jid over against this memorandum (of the King's
>\vn hand2),
Otherwise satisfied.
hich I do the rather mention because it shews in the
ling a nearness,3 but yet with a kind of justness. So
lese little sands and grains of gold and silver (as it
seemeth) holp not a little to make up the great heap
id bank.
But meanwhile to keep the King awake, the Earl of
>uftblk, having been too gay at Prince Arthur's mar-
•iage,4 and sunk himself deep in debt, had yet once
tore a mind to be a knight-errant, and to seek adven-
ts in foreign parts ; and taking his brother with
tim fled again into Flanders. That no doubt which
ive him confidence, was the great murmur of the
)eople against the King's government. And being a
lan of a light and rash spirit, he thought eA^ery va-
>ur would be a tempest. Neither wanted he some
>arty within the kingdom. For the murmur of people
1 Condonationem A. B. impetrandam.
2 Per manum Regis propriam ojoposita sunt hcec verba.
8 Magnam parsimoniam.
4 This is Polydore's statement, but it is a mistake. The Earl of Suffolk
ras gone above a month before Katherine arrived. Fabyan and the old
Chronicle distinctly state that he departed secretly out of the land in Au-
ist, 1501; three months before the marriage of Prince Arthur; and the
Calendar of Patent Rolls (17 Hen. VII. pt. 2. p. 4.) puts the matter out of
doubt; for we there find that on the 8th of October (1501) Sir Robert
Lovell was appointed receiver and surveyor of all lands, &c. in Norfolk
and Suffolk, late the property of the rebel Edmund Earl of Suffolk.
330 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
awakes the discontents ] of nobles, and again that call-
eth up commonly some head of sedition. The King
resorting to his wonted and tried arts, caused Sir
Robert Curson, captain of the castle at Hammes,
(being at that time beyond sea, and therefore less
likely to be wrought upon by the King) to fly from
his charge and to feign himself a servant of the Earl's.
This knight having insinuated himself into the secrets
of the Earl, and finding by him upon whom chiefly he
had either hope or hold, advertised the King thereof
in great secrecy ; but nevertheless maintained his own
credit and inward trust with the Earl. Upon whose
advertisements, the King attached William Courtney
Earl of Devonshire, his brother-in-law,2 married to
the Lady Katherine, daughter to King Edward the
Fourth ; William Delapole, brother to the Earl of
Suffolk ; Sir James Tirrell and Sir John Windham,
and some other meaner persons, and committed them
to custody.3 George Lord Abergavenny and Sir
Thomas Green were at the same time apprehended ;
but as upon less suspicion, so in a freer restraint, and
were soon after delivered. The Earl of Devonshire
being interessed in the blood of York, (that was
rather feared than nocent,4) yet as one that might be
the object of others plots and designs, remained pris-
oner in the Tower during the King's life. William
Delapole was also long restrained, though not so
straitly. But for Sir James Tirrell (against whom
1 Novaiiim rerum studium.
2 Arctissimd affinitate cum Rege conjunctus (quippe qui m malrimonium,
&c). It should have been u his wife's brother-in-law."
3 About the beginning of March, 1501-2. Old Chron. fo. 201. b.
4 Qui cum sanguine familice Eboracensis tarn alto gradu commixtus erat
ideoque a rege metuebatur sane, licet omnino insons /merit.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
331
the blood of the innocent Princes, Edward the Fifth
and his brother, did still cry from under the altar),
and Sir John Windham, and the other meaner ones,
they were attainted and executed ; * the two knights
beheaded. Nevertheless to confirm the credit of Cur-
>n (who belike had not yet done all his feats of activ-
ity), there was published at Paul's Cross about the
time of the said executions2 the Pope's bull of excom-
Lunication and curse against the Earl of Suffolk and
>ir Robert Curson, and some others by name, and
ike wise in general against all the abettors of the said
iarl : wherein it must be confessed, that heaven was
lade too much to bow to earth, and religion to policy,
lut soon after,3 Curson when he saw time returned
ito England, and withal into wonted favour with the
jng, but worse fame with the people. Upon whose
jturn the Earl was much dismayed, and seeing him-
£f destitute of hopes (the Lady Margaret also by
ract of time and bad success being now become cool
in those attempts), after some wandering in France
and Germany, and certain little projects (no better
than squibs) of an exiled man, being tired out, retired
again into the protection of the Archduke Philip in
Flanders, who by the death of Isabella was at that
time King of Castile, in the right of Joan his wife.
1 On the 6th of May, 1502 (Stowe).
2 Later. We learn from Fabyan that they were cursed twice ; once on
the Sunday before St. Simon and Jude, 1502; which was the 23rd of Octo-
jr; and again on the first Sunday in Lent, 1503; which was the 5th of
larch.
8 Not before March, 1502-3. See last note. It appears from the Calen-
lar of Patent Rolls that he received a pardon on the 5th of May, 1504.
That he had been acting all the time in the interest and confidence of
lenry, is stated on no better authority, I believe, than Polydore's, and may
fairly doubted.
332 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
This year, being the nineteenth of his reign,1 the
King called his Parliament, wherein a man may easily
guess how absolute the King took himself to be with
his Parliament ; 2 when Dudley, that was so hateful,
was made Speaker of the House of Commons. In this
Parliament there were not made many 3 statutes mem-
orable touching public government. But those that
were had still the stamp of the King's wisdom and
policy.
There was a statute made for the disannulling of
all patents of lease or grant to such as came not upon
lawful summons to serve the King in his wars, against
the enemies or rebels, or that should depart without
the King's licence ; with an exception of certain per-
sons of the long-robe : providing nevertheless that they
1 Not this year, if by "this" be meant the year of the execution just
mentioned. Sir James Tyrrel was executed on the 6th of May, 1502, A.
R. 17. Parliament met on the 25th of January, 1503-4, A. R. 19.
2 This growing " absoluteness of the King with his Parliament," an ab-
soluteness which his son inherited, sufficiently accounts for the discontinu-
ance of the " Great Councils," formerly resorted to by way of feeler or
preparative, when in unsettled times the temper of a Parliament could not
so well be foreseen. After the 32nd of Henry VIII., in which year the
Register of the Privy Council (discontinued or lost since the 13th of Hen.
VI.) was ordered to be regularly kept, there is no record I believe of the
holding of any such " Great Council." The strange thing is that they
should have dropped, not only out of use, but out of memory: a thing so
strange that one would doubt whether they ever were in use, if it were not
established by evidence direct and incontrovertible. That a foreigner, and
a man of no great sagacity, like Polydore Vergil, should overlook the fact,
is nothing remarkable; that other popular historians should follow their
leader without inquiry, was natural; that so strong an array of negative
evidence should be taken by ordinary inquirers as sufficient proof that no
such councils had ever been called, was also natural. But that profound
constitutional lawyers like Sir Edward Coke, and profound constitutional
antiquarians like Sir Robert Cotton, should have met with nothing in their
researches to suggest the fact, is a mystery to me.
8 So MS. Paucce admodum latce sunt leges, &c. Ed. 1622 has " any."
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 333
should have the King's wages from their house,1 till
their return home again. There had been the like
made before for offices,2 and by this statute it was
extended to lands. But a man may easily see by
many statutes made in this King's time, that the King
thought it safest to assist martial law by law of Par-
liament.
Another statute was made, prohibiting the bringing
in of manufactures of silk wrought by itself or mixt
with any other thrid.3 But it was not of stuffs of
whole-piece (for that the realm had of them no manu-
facture in use at that time), but of knit silk or texture
of silk ; as ribbands, laces, cauls, points, and girdles,
&c. which the people of England could then well skill
to make. This law pointed at a true principle ; That
where foreign materials are but superfluities, foreign
manufactures should be prohibited. For that will
either banish the superfluity, or gain the manufac-
ture.
There was a law also of resumption of patents of
gaols, and the reannexing of them to the sheriffwicks ; 4
privileged officers being no less an interruption of jus-
tice than privileged places.
There was likewise a law to restrain the by-laws
or ordinances of corporations, which many times were
against the prerogative of the King, the common law
of the realm, and the liberty of the subject : being
1 So MS. and Ed. 1622. The translation has aprimo die proj ectionis sua.
There seems to be an error in the English; which should apparently be
from the day of leaving their house. The words of the act (19 H. 7. c. 1.)
are " from the time of coming from his house toward the King," &c.
I2 Quatenus ad concessiones ojficiorum civilium.
8 Vel simpliciter vel cum mixturd alteriusfili textce. See 19 H. 7. c. 21.
334 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
fraternities in evil.1 It was therefore provided, that
they should not be put in execution, without the allow-
ance of the chancellor, treasurer, and the two chief
justices, or three of them; or of the two justices of
circuit where the corporation was.
Another law was in effect to bring in the silver of
the realm to the mint, in making all clipped minished
or impaired coins of silver not to be current in pay-
ments ; 2 without giving any remedy of weight ; 3 but
with an exception only of reasonable wearing ; which
was as nothing, in respect of the incertainty ; and so
upon the matter to set the mint on work, and to give
way to new coins of silver which should be then
minted.4
There likewise was a long statute against vagabonds,
wherein two things may be noted ; the one, the dis-
like the Parliament had of gaoling of them, as that
which was chargeable, pesterous,5 and of no open ex-
ample. The other, that in the statutes of this King's
time (for this of the nineteenth year is not the only
statute of that kind) there are ever coupled the pun-
ishment of vagabonds, and the forbidding of dice and
cards and unlawful games unto servants and mean
people, and the putting down and suppressing of ale-
1 i. e. these corporations being fraternities in evil. Jlujusmodl municipiis
et collegiis nil aliud existenlibus quam fraternitatibus in malo. See 19 H. 7.
c. 7.
2 i. e. the object of the law was to bring silver to the mint; its enactment
was that clipped coins should not be current. Hoc revera agebat, ut, &c.
Ordinabat autem ut, &c. See 19 H. 7. c. 5.
8 Ne grani quidem facta gratia, quam remedium vocant.
4 Adeo utper consequentiam omnes nummos argenteos in monetariam regis,
iterum recudendos, adduci necesse fuerit ; unde rex propter novam cusionem
fructum perciperet.
5 The translation has Carceres superoneraret.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 335
bouses; as strings of one root together, and as if the
one were unprofitable without the other.1
As for riots and retainers, there passed scarce any
Parliament in this time without a law against them :
the King ever having an eye to might and multi-
tude2
There was granted also that Parliament a subsidy,3
both from4 the temporalty and the clergy. And yet
nevertheless ere the year expired there went out com-
missions for a general benevolence ; 6 though there
were no wars ; no fears. The same year the City
gave live thousand marks, for confirmation of their
liberties ; a thing fitter for the beginnings of kings'
reigns than the latter ends. Neither was it a small
matter that the mint gained upon the late statute, by
the recoinage of groats and half-groats; now twelve-
pences and six-pences. As for Empson and Dudley's
1 i. e. as if the punishment of the one were unprofitable without the
putting down of the others. The translation has, more correctly, atque ac
si alterum absque cceteris extingui posse vana opinio esset. The statute in
question is 19 H. 7. c. 12.
2 Magnatum potentiam et populares coitus. See 19 H. 7. c. 13, 14.
8 The King had at this time a claim by law upon his subjects for " two
reasonable aids; " one for the knighting of his son, the other for the mar-
riage of his daughter. The Commons offered him 40,000/. in lieu of the
said two aids. See Statutes of the Realm, p. 675.
The old Chronicle says that there was granted to the King at this Par-
liament an aid of 36,000/.
Modern historians state, I do not know on what authority, that the King
■is content with 30,000/. i
* So MS. Ed. 1622 has " for."
5 This is stated by Holinshed; and in the book of the King's payments
Ihapter House Records: A. 5. 18.) there are several items dated in the
21st of Henry VII. relating to the "arrears of the Benevolence," which
seem to confirm the statement. It appears however from the Calendar of
Patent Rolls (21 Hen. VII. pt. 1. p. 51.) that they were the arrears of the
former Benevolence, made leviable by Parliament 11 Hen. VII. c. 10. I
spect therefore that this is a mistake.
336 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
mills, they did grind more than ever. So that it was
a strange thing to see what golden showers poured
down upon the King's treasury at once. The last
payments of the marriage-money from Spain. The
subsidy. The benevolence. The recoinage. The
redemption of the city's liberties. The casualties.1
And this is the more to be marvelled at, because the
King had then no occasions at all of wars or troubles.
He had now but one son ; and one daughter unbe-
stowed. He was wise. He was of an high mind.
He needed not to make riches his glory,2 he did excel
in so many things else ; save that certainly avarice
doth ever find in itself matter of ambition. Belike
he thought 3 to leave his son such a kingdom and such
a mass of treasure, as he might choose his greatness
where he would.
This year was also kept the Serjeants' feast,4 which
was the second call in this King's days.
About this time 6 Isabella Queen of Castile deceased ;
a right noble lady, and an honour to her sex and
times ; and the corner-stone of the greatness of Spain
that hath followed. This accident the King took not
for news at large, but thought it had a great relation
to his own affairs ; especially in two points : the one
for example, the other for consequence. First he con-
1 Casualia undique emergentia.
2 Ed. 1622 has a full stop after " glory; " which is clearly wrong. The
MS. has only a comma; and the translation has cum aliis rebus plurimis
.... eniteret.
3 Forsitan amor Jilii hanc cogitationem animo suo suggessit, se tarn potem
regnum, &c.
4 On the 13th of November, 1503, according to the old Chronicle, fo. 206.
5 He should have said in the beginning of the next year, which was the
20th of the King. Queen Isabella died on the 26th of November, 1504.
See Prescott's History of Ferdinand and Isabella.
trai
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 337
ived that the case of Ferdinando of Arragon after
8 death of Queen Isabella, was his own case after
e death of his own Queen ; and the case of Joan the
ir unto Castile, was the case of his own son Prince
en rv. -For if both of the Kings had their kingdoms
in the right of their wives, they descended to the heirs
d did not accrue to the husbands. And although
s own case had both steel and parchment more than
e other ; 1 that is to say, a conquest in the field and
act of Parliament ; yet notwithstanding that natu-
1 title of descent in blood did (in the imagination
en of a wise man) breed a doubt that the other two
ere not safe nor sufficient. Wherefore he was won-
erful diligent to inquire and observe what became of
the King of Arragon in holding and continuing the
kingdom of Castile ; and whether he did hold it in
his own right, or as administrator to his daughter;
and whether he were like to hold it in fact, or to be
put out by his son-in-law.2 Secondly, he did revolve
in his mind, that the state of Christendom might by
this late accident have a turn. For whereas before
time himself with the conjunction of Arragon and Cas-
tile (which then was one), and the amity of Maxi-
milian and Philip his son the Archduke, was far too
strong a party for France ; he began to fear that now
the French King (who had great interest in the affec-
tions of Philip the young King of Castile), and Philip
himself now King of Castile (who was in ill terms
ith his father-in-law about the present government
1 I lie Ferdinandi.
> This latter clause "and whether he were like," &c. is omitted in the
relation. The previous one is worded rather more accurately thus —
Atque insuper, si forte retinuisset, utrum in jure proprio vel ut administrator
bonorum JMce sua se Mud tenere projiteretur.
vol. xi. 22
838 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
of Castile), and thirdly Maximilian, Philip's father,
(who was ever variable, and upon whom the surest
aim that could be taken was that he would not be
long as he had been last before), would all three being
potent Princes, enter into some strait league and con-
federation amongst themselves, whereby though he
should not be endangered, yet he should be left to
the poor amity of Arragon ; and whereas he had been
heretofore a kind of arbiter of Europe, he should now
go less, and be over-topped by so great a conjunction.
He had also (as it seems) an inclination to marry,
and bethought himself of some fit conditions abroad.1
And amongst others he had heard of the beauty and
virtuous behaviour2 of the young Queen of Naples,
the widow of Ferdinando the younger, being then of
matronal years of seven and twenty : by whose mar-
riage he thought that the kingdom of Naples, having
been a goal 3 for a time between the King of Arragon
and the French King, and being but newly settled,
might in some part be deposited in his hands, who
was so able to keep the stakes. Therefore he sent in
ambassage or message three confident persons, Francis
Marsin, James Braybrooke, and John Stile, upon two
several inquisitions, rather than negotiations : 4 the one
1 Et circumspicere quales condiliones malHinoniorum in Europa tunc se os-
tenderent.
2 Moribus suavissimis.
8 This word seems to be used here merely for a subject of contention.
The translation has de quo . . . cerlaium futrat.
4 A copy of the several articles, with the answers, is still extant in the
Cotton collection. The part which relates to the Queen of Naples is in
Vitel. C. xi. fo. 34. The part which relates to Ferdinand in Vesp. C. vi.
fo. 338. The commissioners went first to Valencia where the two Queens
were; and then to Segovia where they arrived on the 14th of July, 1505,
and had their interview with Ferdinand two or three days after.
An entry in a book of accompts of Henry VII., now in the British Mu-
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 339
touching the person and condition of the young Queen
of Naples : the other touching all particulars of estate
that concerned the fortunes and intentions of Ferdi-
nando. And because they may observe best who
themselves are observed least, he sent them under col-
on ruble pretexts ; giving them letters of kindness and
compliment from Katherine the Princess to her aunt
and niece, the old and young Queen of Naples ; and
delivering to them also a book of new articles of
peace ; which notwithstanding it had been delivered
unto Doctor de Puebla, the lieger ambassador of Spain
here in England, to be sent; yet for that the King
had been long without hearing from Spain, he thought
good those messengers, when they had been with the
two Queens, should likewise pass on to the court of
Ferdinando, and take a copy of the book with them.
'he instructions touching the Queen of Naples were
curious and exquisite, being as articles whereby to
lirect a survey or framing a particular of her person,1
for complexion, favour, feature,2 stature, health, age,
customs, behaviour, conditions, and estate ; as, if the
turn (Additional MSS. 21,480), gives the date of their departure, and is
rorth inserting as a record of the terms upon which such services were
lid. Among the payments of the 1st and 2nd of May, in the 20th year
Henry's reign, I find —
" Item to James Braybrooke going upon the King's message for four
months at 5s. the day 281.
" Item to Fraunces Marzen for his costs at 5s. the day in likewise . 28/.
" Item for John Style his costs at is. the day 221. 8s. r'
1 Cum articulos conlinerent adeo prcecisos ut veluli tabulam aliquant confi-
dent personaz ejus.
2 Aspectum, lineamenta corporis. In the original instructions, one of the
lings which the commissioners are directed " specially to mark and note
rell" is "the feature of her body; " upon which they report that they
m give no answers to that point because the young Queen was so covered
rith her mantle that they could only see her visage.
340 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
King had been young, a man would have judged him
to be amorous ; but being ancient, it ought to be inter-
preted that sure he was very chaste, for that he meant
to find all things in one woman, and so to settle his
affections without ranging. But in this match he was
soon cooled, when he heard from his ambassadors that
this young Queen had had a goodly jointure in the
realm of Naples, well answered during the time of
her uncle Frederick, yea and during the time of Lewis
the French King, in whose division her revenue fell ;
but since the time that the kingdom was in Ferdi-
nando's hands, all was assigned to the army and gar-
risons there ; and she received only a pension or
exhibition out of his coffers.
The other part of the inquiry had a grave and dili-
gent return ; informing the King at full of the present
state of King Ferdinando. By this report it appeared
to the King that Ferdinando did continue the govern-
ment of Castile as administrator unto his daughter
Joan, by the title of Queen Isabella's will, and partly
by the custom of the kingdom (as he pretended) ; and
that all mandates and grants were expedited in the
name of Joan his daughter and himself as adminis-
trator, without mention of Philip her husband. And
that King Ferdinando, howsoever he did dismiss him-
self of the name of King of Castile, yet meant to hold
the kingdom without account and in absolute com-
mand.
It appeareth also that he flattered himself with hopes
that King Philip would permit unto him the govern-
ment of Castile during his life ; which he had laid his
plot to work him unto,1 both by some counsellors of
1 Quod Ferdinandus certe eipersuadere vehementer conatus est.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 341
his about him which Ferdinando had at his devotion,
and chiefly by promise1 that in case Philip gave not
way unto it he would marry some young lady, where-
by to put him by the succession of Arragon and
Granada, in case he should have a son ; and lastly
by representing unto him that the government of the
Burgundians, till Philip were by continuance in Spain
made as natural of Spain, would not be endured by
the Spaniards. But in all those things, though wisely
laid down and considered, Ferdinando failed ; but that
Pluto was better to him than Pallas.
In the same report also the ambassadors, being mean
men and therefore the more free, did strike upon a
string which was somewhat dangerous ; for they de-
clared plainly that the people of Spain both nobles
and commons were better affected unto the part of
'hilip (so he brought his wife with him) than to
'erdinando ; and expressed the reason to be, because
le had imposed upon them many taxes and tallages ;
diich was the King's own case between him and his
5011 .2
There was also in this report a declaration of an
>verture of marriage, which Amason the secretary of
lerdinando had made unto the ambassadors in great
jcret, between Charles Prince of Castile and Mary
Le King's second daughter ; assuring the King that
le treaty of marriage then on foot for the said Prince
md the daughter of France would break ; and that
le the said daughter of France should be married to
jigolesme, that was the heir apparent of France.
1 Protestatione.
2 Quce certe, simul representata, ipsissimum casum exprimebant inter regem
tjilium suum.
342 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
There was a touch also of a speech of marriage be-
tween Ferdinando and Madame de Fois, a lady of the
blood of France, which afterwards indeed succeeded.
But this was reported as learnt in France, and silenced
in Spain.1
The King by the return of this ambassage, which
gave great light unto his affairs, was well instructed
and prepared how to carry himself between Ferdi-
nando King of Arragon and Philip his son-in-law
King of Castile ; resolving with himself to do all that
in him lay to keep them at one within themselves ; but
howsoever that succeeded, by a moderate carriage and
bearing the person of a common friend to lose neither
of their friendships ; but yet to run a course more
entire with the King of Arragon, but more laboured
and officious with the King of Castile.2 But he was
much taken with the overture of marriage with his
daughter Mary ; both because it was the greatest
marriage of Christendom, and for that it took hold
of both allies. But to corroborate his alliance with
Philip, the winds gave him an interview. For
Philip choosing the winter season the better to sur-
prise the King of Arragon, set forth with a great
navy out of Flanders for Spain in the month of
January, the one and twentieth year of the King's
reign. But himself was surprised with a cruel tem-
pest, that scattered his ships upon the several coasts
of England ; and the ship wherein the King and
Queen were, with two other small barks only, torn
1 Tamquam rem quam in Gallia perdidicerant, in Hispania autem silentio
cohibitam. " Silenced " seems to mean merely not talked of.
2 lta tamen ut interiore affectu Ferdinandi rebus faveret, externis vero
demonstrationibus et ojficiis Philippum magis demereretur.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 343
and in great peril, to escape the fury of the weather
thrust into Weymouth. King Philip himself, having
not been used as it seems to sea, all wearied and ex-
treme sick, would needs land to refresh his spirits ;
though 4t was against the opinion of his counsel,
doubting it might breed delay, his occasions requir-
ing celerity.
The rumour of the arrival of a puissant navy upon
the coast made the country arm. And Sir Thomas
Trenchard, with forces suddenly raised, not knowing
what the matter might be, came to Weymouth : where
understanding the accident, he did in all humbleness
and humanity invite the King and Queen to his house ;
and forthwith dispatched posts to the court. Soon
after came Sir John Caroe l likewise with a great troop
of men well armed, using the like humbleness and
respects towards the King, when he knew the case.
King Philip doubting that they, being but subjects,
it not let him pass away again without the King's
)tice and leave, yielded to their intreaties to stay till
Ley heard from the court. The King, as soon as he
leard the news, commanded presently the Earl of
.rundel to go to visit the King of Castile, and to let
im2 understand that as he was very sorry for his
tishap, so he was glad that he had escaped the danger
the seas, and likewise of the occasion himself had
do him honour ; and desiring him to think himself
in his own land ; and that the King made all haste
>ssible to come and embrace him. The Earl came to
dm in great magnificence with a brave troop of three
idred horse ; and for more state came by torch-light.
1 So spelt both in MS. and Ed. 1622.
2 So MS. Ed. 1622 has " and let him."
344 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
After he had done the King's message, King Philip
seeing how the world went,1 the sooner to get away,
went upon speed to the King at Windsor, and his
Queen followed by easy journeys. The two Kings at
their meeting used all the caresses and loving demon-
strations that were possible. And the King of Castile
said pleasantly to the King, that he was now punished
for that he would not come within his walled town of
Calais, when they met last. But the King answered,
that walls and seas were nothing where hearts were
open ; and that he was here no otherwise but to be
served. After a day or two's refreshing, the Kings
entered into speech of renewing the treaty ; the King
saying that though King Philip's person were the
same, yet his fortunes and state were raised ; in which
case a renovation of treaty was used amongst Princes.
But while these things were in handling, the King
choosing a fit time, and drawing the King of Castile
into a room where they two only were private, and
laying his hand civilly upon his arm, and changing
his countenance a little from a countenance of enter-
tainment,'2 said to him, Sir, you have been saved upon
my coast, I hope you will not suffer me to wreck upon
yours. The King of Castile asked him what he meant
by that speech ? I mean it (saith the King) by that
same harebrain wild fellow my subject the Earl of
Suffolk, who is protected in your country, and begins
to play the fool, when all others are weary of it. The
King of Castile answered, I had thought, Sir, your
felicity had been above those thoughts. But if it
trouble you, I will banish him. The King replied,
1 Regis animum satis perspiciens.
2 Vultuque nonnihil ad serium composite.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 345
those hornets were best in their nest, and worst then
when they did fly abroad ; and that his desire was to
have him delivered to him. The King of Castile here-
with a little confused, and in a study, said, That can I
not do with my honour, and less with yours ; for you
will be thought to have used me as a prisoner. The
King presently said, Then the matter is at an end.
For I will take that dishonour upon me, and so your
honour is saved. The King of Castile, who had the
King in great estimation, and besides remembered
where he was, and knew not what use he might have
of the King's amity ; for that himself was new in his
state of Spain, and unsettled both with his father-in-law
and with his people ; composing his countenance, said,
Sir, you give law to me ; but so will I to you. You
shall have him, but upon your honour you shall not
take his life. The King embracing him said, Agreed.
Saith the King of Castile, Neither shall it dislike you,
I send to him in such a fashion as he may partly
>me with his own good will. The King said it was
rell thought of; and if it pleased him he would join
rith him in sending to the Earl a message to that pur-
se. They both sent severally ; and mean while they
mtinued feasting and pastimes ; the King being on his
irt willing to have the Earl sure before the King of
Jastile went ; and the King of Castile being as willing
seem to be enforced.1 The King also with many
rise and excellent persuasions did advise the King of
Jastile to be ruled by the counsel of his father-in-law
'erdinando ; a Prince so prudent, so experienced, so
>rtunate. The King of Castile (who was in no very
rood terms with his said father-in-law) answered, that
1 In hoc conveniente, ut res manifestius a se extorta putaretur.
346 HISTORY OF KING HENRY fll.
if his father-in-law would suffer him to govern his
kingdoms, he should govern him.
There were immediately messengers sent from both
Kings to recall the Earl of Suffolk ; who upon gentle
words used to him was soon charmed, and willing
enough to return ; assured of his life, and hoping of
his liberty. He was brought through Flanders to
Calais, and thence landed at Dover, and with suf-
ficient guard delivered and received at the Tower
of London.1 Meanwhile King Henry to draw out
the time, continued his feastings and entertainments,
and after he had2 received the King of Castile in-
to the fraternity of the Garter, and for a recipro-
cal had his son the Prince admitted to the order of
the Golden Fleece, he accompanied King Philip and
his Queen to the City of London ; where they were
entertained with the greatest magnificence and triumph
that could be upon no greater warning. And as soon
as the Earl of Suffolk had been conveyed to the Tower
(which was the serious part) the jollities had an end,
and the Kings took leave. Nevertheless during their
being here, they in substance concluded that treaty
which the Flemings term intercursus mains, and bears
date at Windsor : for there be some things in it more
to the advantage of the English than of them ; espe-
cially for that the free fishing of the Dutch upon the
coasts and seas of England, granted in the treaty of
undeeimo, was not by this treaty confirmed ; all articles
that confirm former treaties being precisely and warily
1 About the end of March, 1505-6, according to the old Chronicle, fo.
207.
2 All this from " to draw out" to " after he had," is omitted in the trans-
lation.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
347
limited and confined to matter of commerce only, and
not otherwise.
It was observed that the great tempest which drave
Philip into England blew down the golden eagle from
le spire- of Paul's, and in the fall it fell upon a sign
)f the black eagle which was in Paul's church-yard in
le place where the school-house now standeth,1 and
ittered it and broke it down ; which was a strange
stooping of a hawk upon a fowl. This the people
iterpreted to be an ominous prognostic upon the
iperial house ; which was by interpretation also ful-
illed upon Philip the Emperor's son ; not only in the
>resent disaster of the tempest, but in that that fol-
>wed. For Philip arriving into Spain and attaining
ie possession of the kingdom of Castile without resist-
lce, insomuch as Ferdinando who had spoke so great
>efore was with difficulty admitted to the speech of
lis son-in-law, sickened soon after, and deceased: yet
?r such time as there was an observation by the
risest of that court, that if he had lived his father
rould have gained upon him in that sort, as he would
Lve governed his counsels and designs, if not his affec-
ions. By this all Spain returned into the power of
I'erdinando in state as it was before ; the rather in
jgard of the infirmity of Joan his daughter, who
loving her husband (by whom she had many children)
dearly well, and no less beloved of him (howsoever
her father to make Philip ill-beloved of the people of
Spain gave out that Philip used her not well), was
unable in strength of mind to bear the grief of his de-
cease, and fell distracted of her wits : 2 of which malady
1 The words " in the place where," &c. are omitted in the translation.
2 She is said to have exhibited decided symptoms of insanity before.
348 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
her father was thought no ways to endeavour the cure,
the better to hold his regal power in Castile. So that
as the felicity of Charles the Eighth was said to be a
dream, so the adversity of Ferdinando was said like-
wise to be a dream, it passed over so soon.
About this time the Kino; was desirous to bring into
the house of Lancaster celestial honour ; and became
suitor to Pope Julius to canonise King Henry the
Sixth for a saint ; the rather in respect of that his
famous prediction of the King's own assumption to the
crown. Julius referred the matter (as the manner is)
to certain cardinals to take the verification of his holy
acts and miracles : but it died under the reference.
The general opinion was, that Pope Julius was too
dear, and that the King would not come to his rates.
But it is more probable, that that Pope, who was ex-
Modem historians, deriving their information from the Spanish writers,
represent Philip as having really used her ill. But this does not appear to
have been the impression of the Venetian ambassador Vincenzo Quirini;
whose "relazione" (written shortly after Philip's death) contains an ac-
count of the relation between them, which agrees very well with what
Bacon says. After giving a very favourable character of Philip, the am-
bassador proceeds: — "A questo principe cosl grande e nobile, e cosl
virtuoso, fu data per moglie una donna gelosa (ancora che assai bella e
nobilissima e di tanti regni erede) la quale con la sua gelosia molestava in
tal modo il marito, che il povero ed infelice non si poteva in tutti di lei
contentare; perche la non parlava con molte persone, ne accarezzava
alcuno; stava sempre ristretta in camera e consumavasi de se stessa per
gelosia; amava la solitudine, fuggiva feste, solazzi, e piaceri, e sopra tutto
non voleva compagnia di donne, ne fiamminghe, ne spagnuole, ne vecchie,
ne giovani, ne di qualunque altro grado. E pero donna di buon ingegno, e
apprenda comodamente quello che le vien detto, e le poche parole ch' ella
risponde le parla con buona maniera e con buona forma, servando quella
gravita che a regina si conviene; il che potei comprendere quando per
norae della serenita vostra le feci riverenza, ed esposi brevemente quello
che in commissione avevo." Alberi, Ser. 1. vol. i. p. 5, 6.
If this be true, it is easy to believe both in her affection for Philip dur-
ing his life and in her distraction at his death; and also that two very
different stories might be told with regard to his treatment of her.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
349
tivmt'lv jealous of the dignity of the see of Rome and
of the acts thereof, knowing that King Henry Sixth
was reputed in the world abroad but for a simple man,
was afraid it would but diminish the estimation of that
id of honour, if there were not a distance kept
jtween innocents and saints.
The same year likewise there proceeded a treaty of
irriage between the King and the Lady Margaret
mchess Dowager of Savoy, only daughter to Maxi-
dlian and sister to the King of Castile ; a lady wise
id of great good fame. This matter had been in
jech between the two Kings at their meeting ; but
is soon after resumed ; and therein was employed for
lis first piece the King's then chaplain, and after the
•eat prelate, Thomas Wolsey.1 It was in the end
mcluded with great and ample conditions for the
]ing, but with promise defutwo only. It may be the
!ing was the rather induced unto it, for that he had
leard more and more of the marriage to go on be-
reen his great friend and ally Ferdinando of Arragon
id Madame de Fois ; whereby that King began to
)iece with the French King, from whom he had been
Iways before severed. So fatal a thing it is for the
'eatest and straitest amities of Kings at one time or
)ther to have a little of the wheel. Nay there is a
irther tradition (in Spain though not with us) that
le King of Arragon (after he knew that the marriage
1 It seems that Wolsey was employed in the negotiation of this marriage
early as Nov. 1504. See Cott. Galba B. ii. fo. 128. But the date is
ily in the margin.
That volume consists of original instructions, &c. from Hen. VII. but
been so damaged by fire that one can only make out the general sub-
let. There is not a leaf of which the edges have not been burned away.
The articles are in Vitel. C. xi. fo. 127.
350 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
between Charles the young Prince of Castile and
Mary the King's second daughter went roundly on,
which though it was first moved by the King of Ar-
ragon, yet it was afterwards wholly advanced and
brought to perfection by Maximilian and the friends
on that side) entered into a jealousy that the King did
aspire to the government of Castilia,1 as administrator
during the minority of his son-in-law ; as if there
should have been a competition of three for that gov-
ernment ; Ferdinando grandfather on the mother's
side ; Maximilian grandfather on the father's side ;
and King Henry father-in-law to the young Prince.
Certainly it is not unlike but the King's government
(carrying the young Prince with him) would have
been perhaps more welcome to the Spaniards than that
of the other two. For the nobility of Castilia, that so
lately put out the King of Arragon in favour of King
Philip, and had discovered themselves so far, could not
be but in a secret distrust and distaste of that King.
And as for Maximilian, upon twenty respects he could
not have been the man. But this purpose of the
King's seemeth to me (considering the King's safe
courses,2 never found to be enterprising or adventu-
rous,) not greatly probable ; except he should have had
a desire to breathe warmer, because he had ill lungs.
This marriage with Margaret was protracted from
1 Dr. Lingard (quoting Zurita, vi. 163.) says that after the death of
Philip, Maximilian urged Henry to make this claim.
The following entry in the Calendar of Patent Rolls (22 Hen. VII. pt. 3.
p. 20.) may be quoted as bearing indirectly upon this point.
" 14 June. License (at the request of Margaret Duchess Dowager of Sa-
voy, John Sheldon Governor, and merchants adventurers) to the said Gov-
ernor and merchants to resort to and freely trade in Holland, Zealand,
Brabant, and Flanders, and other countries under the rule of OasHU."
2 Regis mores reputantibus et consilia tuta et solida.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 351
time to time, in respect of the infirmity of the King,1
who now in the two and twentieth of his reign began
to be troubled with the gout : but the defluxion taking
also into his breast, wasted his lungs, so that thrice in a
mar in a kind of return, and especially in the spring,
he had great fits and labours of the tissick.2 Never-
theless he continued to intend business with as great
diligence as before in his health : yet so, as upon this
warning he did likewise now more seriously think of
the world to come ; and of making himself a saint, as
well as King Henry the Sixth, by treasure better em-
ployed than to be given to Pope Julius. For this year
he gave greater alms than accustomed, and discharged
all prisoners about the City that lay for fees, or debts
under forty shillings. He did also make haste with
religious foundations. And in the year following,
which was the three and twentieth, finished that of the
avoy. And hearing also of the bitter cries of his
pie against the oppressions of Dudley and Empson
and their complices, partly by devout persons about
him and partly by public sermons (the preachers doing
their duty therein), he was touched with great remorse
for the same. Nevertheless Empson and Dudley
1 Dr. Lingard, who has had recourse to Spanish historians and archives,
gives a different explanation of the breaking off of this treaty: viz. that
upon the death of Philip (25 Sep. 1506) Henry conceived the idea of mar-
rying his widow Juana Queen of Castile; which he only abandoned on
King satisfied that her insanity was permanent and incurable.
It seems however that the marriage with Margaret was still in consider-
ion in September, 1507, and that Maximilian was still in hope of its pro-
eding, and that Margaret herself had some objections from an apprehen-
m that it would imprison her in England. The difficulty of agreeing
•on the conditions in this respect would account sufficiently for its not
ing concluded. See Corr. de Maximilian I. et de Marguerite d'Autriche,
1. p. 11. Margaret assumed the government of the Low Countries in the
I ginning of 1507.
£
352 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
though they could not but hear of these scruples in
the King's conscience, yet as if the King's soul and his
money were in several offices, that the one was not to
intermeddle with the other, went on with as great rage
as ever.1 For the same three and twentieth year was
there a sharp prosecution 2 against Sir William Capel
(now the second time), and this was for matters of
misgovernment 3 in his mayoralty : the great matter
being, that in some payments he had taken knowledge
of false moneys, and did not his diligence to examine
and beat it out who were the offenders. For this and
some other things laid to his charge, he was condemned
to pay two thousand pounds ; and being a man of
stomach, and hardened by his former troubles, re-
fused to pay a mite ; and belike used some untoward
speeches of the proceedings ; for which he was sent to
the Tower, and there remained till the King's death.
Knesworth likewise, that had been lately Mayor of
London, and both his Sheriffs, were for abuses in their
offices questioned, and imprisoned, and delivered upon
one thousand four hundred pounds paid. Hawis, an
Alderman of London, was put in trouble, and died
with thought and anguish before his business came to
an end. Sir Laurence Ailmer, who had likewise been
Mayor of London, and his two Sheriffs, were put to
the fine of one thousand pounds. And Sir Laurence
for refusing to make payment was committed to prison,
where he stayed till Empson himself was committed in
his place.
It is no marvel (if the faults were so light and the
rates so heavy) that the King's treasure of store that
1 Nihilo lenlius populum gravabant.
2 Orudelissime actum est.
3 Prcetextu quod se male gessisset.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 353
he left at his death, most of it in secret places under
his 'ami key and keeping at Richmond, amounted (as
l»\ tradition it is reported to have done1) unto the sum
of near eighteen hundred thousand pounds sterling ; a
huge mass of money even for these times.
The last act of state that concluded this King's tern-
poral felicity, was the conclusion of a glorious match
between his daughter Mary and Charles Prince of
Castile, afterwards the great Emperor ; both being of
tender years: which treaty was perfected2 by Bishop
Foxe and other his commissioners at Calais, the year
before the King's death. In which alliance it seemeth
he himself took so high contentment, as in a letter
which he wrote thereupon to the City of London, com-
manding all possible demonstrations of joy to be made
for the same, he expresseth himself as if he thought
he had built a wall of brass about his kingdom, when
he had for his sons-in-law a King of Scotland and a
'rince of Castile and Burgundy. So as now there
as nothing to be added to this great King's felic-
>\ being at the top of all worldly bliss, in regard of
the high marriages of his children, his great renown
iroughout Europe, and his scarce credible riches, and
ie perpetual constancy of his prosperous successes,
)ut an opportune death, to withdraw him from any
iture blow of fortune : which certainly (in regard of
ie great hatred of his people,3 and the title of his son,
1 The translation omits this clause, and for 1,800,000/. sterling gives ad
immam quinque millionum et dimidice aurewum.
Sir Edward Coke (Institutes, p. 198.) says "fifty and three hundred
lousand pounds." Quoting the Close Roll A0. 3 Hen. 8. A mistake per-
of pounds for nobles; 1,800,000/. being equivalent to 5,400,000 six-
ld-eightpenny-pieces.
2 December 17, 1508.
8 This hatred had probably increased rapidly during the last year or
VOL. XI. 23
354 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
being then come to eighteen years of age, and being a
bold Prince and liberal, and that gained upon the peo-
ple by his very aspect and presence1) had not been
impossible to have comen upon him.
To crown also the last year of his reign as well as
his first, he did an act of piety, rare and worthy to be
taken in imitation. For he granted forth a general
pardon ; 2 as expecting a second coronation in a better
kingdom. He did also declare in his will, that his
mind was, that restitution should be made of those
sums which had been unjustly taken by his officers.
And thus this Salomon of England (for Salomon
also was too heavy upon his people in exactions) hav-
ing lived two and fifty years, and thereof reigned three
and twenty years and eight months, being in perfect
memory and in a most blessed mind, in a great calm of
a consuming sickness, passed to a better world, the two
and twentieth of April 1508,3 at his palace of Rich-
mond which himself had built.
This King4 (to speak of him in terms equal to his
deserving) was one of the best sort of wonders ; a
two. Vincenzo Quirini, writing in 1506, describes Henry as " nomo di
anni cinquanta quattro, assai ben disposto della persona, savio, prudente,
rum odiato ne eziam molto amato dalli suoi popoli." Alberi, Ser. 1. vol. i.
p. 19.
1 Oris majestate.
2 Qualis in coronatione regum concedi solet.
8 This is a mistake; occasioned apparently by a misprint in Speed.
Henry completed his 23rd year on the 21st of August, 1508, and died on
the 22nd of April, 1509.
4 In the character of Henry which follows and concludes the work the
differences between the Latin translation and the English original are
unusually numerous. There is nothing added indeed, nor is the meaning
in any place materially modified. But the expression is so frequently
varied that it would seem as if Bacon had done this part of the transla-
tion himself and with care. I have thought it better therefore to print it
entire. It will be found in the appendix, No. III.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 355
wonder for wise men. He had parts (both in his vir-
tues and his fortune) not so fit for a common-place
as for observation. Certainly he was religious, both
in his affection and observance. But as he could see
clear (for those times) through superstition ; so he
would be blinded now and then by human policy. He
advanced church-men. He was tender in the privilege
of sanctuaries, though they wrought him much mischief.
He built and endowed many religious foundations, be-
sides his memorable hospital of the Savoy: and yet
was he a great alms-giver in secret ; which shewed
that his works in public were dedicated rather to God's
glory than his own. He professed always to love and
seek peace ; and it was his usual preface in his trea-
ties,1 that when Christ came into the world peace was
pong, and when he went out of the world peace was
bequeathed. And this virtue could not proceed out of
fear or softness, for he was valiant and active; and
lerefore no doubt it was truly Christian and moral.
et he knew the way to peace was not to seem to be
iesirous to avoid wars. Therefore would he make
)ffers and fames of wars, till he had mended the con-
litions of peace. It was also much, that one that was
great a lover of peace should be so happy in war.
'or his arms, either in foreign or civil wars, were
tever infortunate; neither did he know what a dis-
»ter meant. The war of his coming in, and the
ibellions of the Earl of Lincoln and the Lord Aud-
ley, were ended by victory. The wars of France and
Scotland by peaces sought at his hands. That of
1 This statement is not strictly borne out by those of his treaties which
re printed in Rymer. It is true however that most of them contain some
)reamble about the blessings of peace. The particular expression quoted
)y Bacon occurs I think in one of the Bulls of dispensation.
356 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
Brittaine by accident of the Duke's death.1 The in-
surrection of the Lord Lovell, and that of Perkin at
Exeter and in Kent, by flight of the rebels before they
came to blows. So that his fortune of arms was still
inviolate. The rather sure, for that in the quenching
of the commotions of his subjects he ever went in per-
son : sometimes reserving himself to back and second
his lieutenants, but ever in action. And yet that was
not merely forwardness, but partly distrust of others.
He did much maintain and countenance his laws ;
which (nevertheless) was no impediment to him to
work his will. For it was so handled that neither
prerogative nor profit went to diminution. And yet
as he would sometimes strain up his laws to his prerog-
ative, so would he also let down his prerogative to his
Parliament. For mint and wars and martial discipline
(things of absolute power) he would nevertheless bring
to Parliament. Justice was well administered in his
time, save where the King was party ; save also that
the counsel-table intermeddled too much with meum
and tuum. For it was a very court of justice during
his time ; especially in the beginning. But in that part
both of justice and policy which is the durable part, and
cut as it were in brass or marble, which is the mak-
ing of good laws, he did excel. And with his justice
1 The war of Brittany, had Bacon's account of it been accurate, must
have been accounted an exception to Henry's usual fortune in war. It
might be an accident, but still it was a failure. But. if we substitute the
true history of it, which I have given in my note p. 154, we may fairly
count it among the examples of his habitual success. The army accom-
plished all it was sent to accomplish; the ultimate frustration of Henry's
object was due to an error of policy, not to an accident of war.
I may take this opportunity of correcting the statement in note 3. p. 97.
as to the spelling of the name Brittaine. It is so spelt in the MS. in that
place and one or two others immediately following. But afterwards it is
always, or almost always, spelt Britaine.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 357
he was also a merciful prince : as in whose time there
w <iv but three of the nobility that suffered ; the Earl
of Warwick ; the Lord Chamberlain ; and the Lord
Audley : though the first two were instead of numbers
11 the dislike and obloquy of the people. But there
/ere never so great rebellions expiated with so little
lood drawn by the hand of justice, as the two rebel-
ons of Blackheath and Exeter. As for the severity
sed upon those which were taken in Kent, it was but
]><>n a scum of people. His pardons went ever both
efore and after his sword. But then he had withal a
strange kind of interchanging of large and inexpected
pardons with severe executions : which (his wisdom
considered) could not be imputed to any inconstancy or
inequality ; but either to some reason which we do not
now know, or to a principle he had set unto himself,
that he would vary, and try both ways in turn. But
the less blood he drew the more he took of treasure :
and as some construed it, he was the more sparing in
the one that he might be the more pressing in the
other ; for both would have been intolerable. Of
nature assuredly he coveted to accumulate treasure ;
and was a little poor in admiring riches. The people
(into whom there is infused for the preservation of
monarchies a natural desire to discharge their princes,
though it be with the unjust charge of their counsellors
and ministers) did impute this unto Cardinal Morton
and Sir Reignold Bray ; who as it after appeared (as
counsellors of ancient authority with him) did so
second his humours, as nevertheless they did temper
them. Whereas Empson and Dudley that followed,
being persons that had no reputation with him other-
wise than by the servile following of his bent, did not
358 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
give way only (as the first did) but shape him way to
those extremities, for which himself was touched with
remorse at his death ; and which his successor re-
nounced, and sought to purge. This excess of his had
at that time many glosses and interpretations. Some
thought the continual rebellions wherewith he had
been vexed had made him grow to hate his people :
Some thought it was done to pull down their stomachs
and to keep them low : Some, for that he would leave
his son a golden fleece : Some suspected he had some
high design upon foreign parts. But those perhaps
shall come nearest the truth that fetch not their rea-
sons so far off; but rather impute it to nature, age,
peace, and a mind fixed upon no other ambition or
pursuit: whereunto I should add, that having every
day occasion to take notice of the necessities and shifts
for money of other great Princes abroad, it did the
better by comparison set off to him the felicity of full
coffers. As to his expending of treasure, he never
spared charge which his affairs required : and in his
buildings was magnificent ; but his rewards were very
limited. So that his liberality was rather upon his
own state and memory than upon the deserts of others.
He was of an hio-h mind, and loved his own will
and his own way; as one that revered himself, and
would reign indeed. Had he been a private man he
would have been termed proud : but in a wise Prince,
it was but keeping of distance ; which indeed he did
towards all ; not admitting any near or full approach
either to his power or to his secrets. For he was
governed by none. His Queen (notwithstanding she
had presented him with divers children ; and with a
crown also, though he would not acknowledge it)
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 359
could do nothing with him. His mother he rever-
enced much, heard little. For any person agreeable
to him for society (such as was Hastings to King
Edward the Fourth, or Charles Brandon after to King
Henry the Eighth), he had none ; except we should
account for such persons Foxe and Bray and Empson,
because they were so much with him. But it was but
as the instrument is much with the workman. He
had nothing in him of vain-glory, but yet kept state
and majesty to the height ; being sensible that majesty
maketh the people bow, but vain-glory boweth to them.
To his confederates abroad he was constant and
just ; but not open. But rather such was his inquiry
and such his closeness, as they stood in the light tow-
ards him, and he stood in the dark to them ; yet
without strangeness, but with a semblance of mutual
communication of affairs. As for little envies or emu-
lations upon foreign princes (which are frequent with
many Kings), he had never any ; but went substan-
tially to his own business. Certain it is, that though
his reputation was great at home, yet it was greater
abroad. For foreigners that could not see the passages
of affairs, but made their judgments upon the issues of
them, noted that he was ever in strife and ever aloft.
It grew also from the airs which the princes and states
abroad received from their ambassadors and agents
here ; which were attending the court in great num-
ber ; whom he did not only content with courtesy,
reward, and privateness ; but (upon such conferences
as passed with them) put them in admiration to find
his universal insight into the affairs of the world :
which though he did suck chiefly from themselves, yet
that which he had gathered from them all seemed ad-
360 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
mirable to every one. So that they did write ever to
their superiors in high terms concerning his wisdom
and art of rule. Nay when they were returned, they
did commonly maintain intelligence with him ; such a
dexterity he had to impropriate to himself all foreign
instruments.
He was careful and liberal to obtain good intelli-
gence from all parts abroad ; wherein he did not only
use his interest in the liegers here, and his pensioners
which he had both in the court of Rome and other the
courts of Christendom, but the industry and vigilancy
of his own ambassadors in foreign parts. For which
purpose his instructions were ever extreme curious
and articulate ; and in them more articles touching
inquisition than touching negotiation : requiring like-
wise from his ambassadors an answer, in particular
distinct articles, respectively to his questions.
As for his secret spials which he did employ both at
home and abroad, by them to discover what practices
and conspiracies were against him ; surely his case
required it ; he had such moles perpetually working
and casting to undermine him. Neither can it be
reprehended ; for if spials be lawful against lawful
enemies, much more against conspirators and traitors.
But indeed to give them credence by oaths or curses,
that cannot be well maintained ; for these are too holy
vestments for a disguise. Yet surely there was this
further good in his employing of those flies and famil-
iars ; that as the use of them was cause that many
conspiracies were revealed, so the fame and suspicion
of them kept (no doubt) many conspiracies from being
attempted.
Towards his Queen he was nothing uxorious ; nor
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
361
scarce indulgent
but companiable and respective, and
without jealousy. Towards his children he was full of
;it(Tii;il affection, careful of their education, aspiring to
eir high advancement, regular to see that they should
ot want of any due honour and respect ; but not
eatly willing to cast any popular lustre upon them.
To his counsel he did refer much, and sat oft in per-
on ; knowing it to be the way to assist his power and
form his judgment : in which respect also he was
irly patient of liberty both of advice and of vote,
ill himself were declared.
He kept a strait hand on his nobility, and chose
rather to advance clergymen and lawyers, which were
ore obsequious to him, but had less interest in the
eople ; which made for his absoluteness, but not for
his safety. Insomuch as I am persuaded it was one
f the causes of his troublesome reign. For that his
nobles, though they were loyal and obedient, yet did
not cooperate with him, but let every man go his own
ay. He was not afraid of an able man, as Lewis the
Eleventh was. But contrariwise he was served by the
ablest men that then were to be found ; without which
his affairs could not have prospered as they did. For
war, Bedford, Oxford, Surrey, Dawbeny, Brooke,
Poynings. For other affairs, Morton, Foxe, Bray, the
rior of Lanthony, Warham, Urswick, Hussey, Fro-
ick, and others. Neither did he care how cunning
they were that he did employ : for he thought himself
to have the master-reach. And as he chose well, so
he held them up well. For it is a strange thing, that
though he were a dark prince, and infinitely suspicious,
and his times full of secret conspiracies and troubles ;
yet in twenty-four years reign he never put down or
362 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
discomposed counsellor or near servant, save only Stan-
ley the Lord Chamberlain. As for the disposition of
his subjects in general towards him, it stood thus with
him ; that of the three affections which naturally tie
the hearts of the subjects to their sovereign, — love,
fear, and reverence, — he had the last in height ; the
second in good measure ; and so little of the first, as
he was beholding to the other two.
He was a Prince, sad, serious, and full of thoughts
and secret observations ; and full of notes and me-
morials of his own hand, especially touching per-
sons ; as whom 1 to employ, whom to reward, whom
to inquire of, whom to beware of, what were the de-
pendencies, what were the factions, and the like ; keep-
ing (as it were) a journal of his thoughts. There is
to this day a merry tale ; that his monkey (set on as
it was thought by one of his chamber) tore his prin-
cipal note-book all to pieces, when by chance it lay
forth : whereat the court which liked not those pensive
accounts was almost tickled with sport.
He was indeed full of apprehensions and suspicions.
But as he did easily take them, so he did easily check
them and master them ; whereby they were not dan-
gerous, but troubled himself more than others. It is
true, his thoughts were so many, as they could not
well always stand together ; but that which did good
one way, did hurt another. Neither did he at some
times weigh them aright in their proportions. Cer-
tainly that rumour which did him so much mischief
(that the Duke of York should be saved and alive)
was (at the first) of his own nourishing, because he
would have more reason not to reign in the right of
1 The rest of the MS. is lost.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII.
363
3 wife. He was affable, and both well and fair
>oken ; and would use strange sweetness and blan-
lishments of words, where he desired to effect or per-
suade any thing that he took to heart. He was
ither studious than learned ; reading most books that
rere of any worth, in the French tongue. Yet he
Lderstood the Latin, as appeareth in that Cardinal
[adrian and others, who could very well have written
Yench, did use to write to him in Latin.
For his pleasures, there is no news of them. And
ret by his instructions to Marsin and Stile touching
the Queen of Naples, it seemeth he could interrogate
well touching beauty. He did by pleasures as great
Princes do by banquets, come and look a little upon
them, and turn way. For never Prince was more
wholly given to his affairs, nor in them more of him-
self: insomuch as in triumphs of justs and tourneys
and balls and masks (which they then called disguises)
le was rather a princely and gentle spectator than
jemed much to be delighted.
No doubt, in him as in all men (and most of all in
Kings) his fortune wrought upon his nature, and his
lature upon his fortune. He attained to the crown,
Lot only from a private fortune, which might endow
dm with moderation ; but also from the fortune of an
exiled man, which had quickened in him all seeds of
observation and industry. And his times being rather
>rosperous than calm, had raised his confidence by suc-
cess, but almost marred his nature by troubles. His
risdom, by often evading from perils, was turned
ither into a dexterity to deliver himself from dangers
when they pressed him, than into a providence to pre-
vent and remove them afar off. And even in nature,
364 HISTOKY OF KING HENRY VII.
the sight of his mind was like some sights of eyes ;
rather strong at hand than to carry afar off. For
his wit increased upon the occasion ; and so much
the more if the occasion were sharpened by danger.
Again, whether it were the shortness of his foresight,
or the strength of his will, or the dazzling of his suspi-
cions, or what it was ; certain it is that the perpetual
troubles of his fortunes (there being no more matter
out of which they grew) could not have been without
some great defects and main errors in his nature, cus-
toms, and proceedings, which he had enough to do to
save and help with a thousand little industries and
watches. But those do best appear in the story itself.
Yet take him with all his defects, if a man should com-
pare him with the Kings his concurrents in France and
Spain, he shall find him more politic than Lewis the
Twelfth of France, and more entire and sincere than
Ferdinando of Spain. But if jou shall change Lewis
the Twelfth for Lewis the Eleventh, who lived a little
before, then the consort is more perfect. For that
Lewis the Eleventh, Ferdinando, and Henry, may be
esteemed for the tres magi of kings of those ages. To
conclude, if this King did no greater matters, it was
long of himself; for what he minded he compassed.
He was a comely personage, a little above just
stature, well and straight limbed, but slender. His
countenance was reverend, and a little like a church-
man : and as it was not strange or dark, so neither
was it winning or pleasing, but as the face of one
well disposed. But it was to the disadvantage of the
painter, for it was best when he spake.
His worth may bear a tale or two, that may put
upon him somewhat that may seem divine. When
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VII. 365
the Lady Margaret his mother had divers great suit-
ors for marriage, she dreamed one night that one in
the likeness of a bishop in pontifical habit did tender
ler Edmund Earl of Richmond (the King's father)
>r her husband. Neither had she ever any child
rat- the King, though she had three husbands. One
ly when King Henry the Sixth (whose innocency
ive him holiness) was washing his hands at a great
jast, and cast his eye upon King Henry, then a
oung youth, he said ; " This is the lad that shall
>ossess quietly that that we now strive for." But
hat that was truly divine in him, was that he had
te fortune of a true Christian as well as of a great
jng, in living exercised and dying repentant. So
he had an happy warfare in both conflicts, both
)f sin and the cross.
He was born at Pembroke Castle, and lieth buried
it Westminster, in one of the stateliest and daintiest
lonuments of Europe, both for the chapel and for
the sepulchre. So that he dwelleth more richly dead,
in the monument of his tomb, than he did alive in
Richmond or any of his palaces. I
could wish he did the like in this
monument of his fame.
APPENDIX.
No. I.
GREAT COUNCILS.
There are three places in this history (see pp. 114. 17(k
260.) in which I have ventured an opinion that what is
called by our historians a Parliament was in reality a Great
Council. The positive and particular grounds for the con-
jecture may be best understood in connexion with the narra-
tive, and have therefore been explained in the several places.
Certain general objections which may perhaps suggest them-
selves, will be answered more conveniently here.
It may be objected in the first place that the point being
one of considerable constitutional importance, it is not likely
that Bacon would have overlooked it. Polydore Vergil in-
deed, who was a foreigner ; Hall, who merely followed Poly-
dore, using no independent judgment of his own ; Holinshed,
who followed Hall ; even Stowe and Speed, who though dili-
gent and original explorers were not statesmen and consti-
tutional lawyers ; — all these might easily make the mistake
and overlook the difficulties which it involves. But Bacon's
acquiescence in such an error, if error it be, is not so easily
accounted for. So familiar as he was with the practical
working of government and the practical solution of state-
problems ; so inquisitive as he was into the particular ways
and methods of Henry the Seventh, regarded as a study in
368 APPENDIX I.
the art of government; so learned as he must have grown,
by thirty years' service as a law officer of the Crown, and
more than thirty as a member of Parliament, in constitu-
tional precedents ; so diligent and vigilant as he was in ob-
serving what he calls the " real passages " of affairs, — the
real means by which ends were brought about ; — it must
be admitted that he was a man very unlikely to overlook
the evidences of such a fact and quite certain not to overlook
the importance of it. The adoption therefore by Bacon of
Polydore Vergil's story, is a negative argument against my
conjecture which it is necessary to remove.
But on referring to the particulars, it will be found that
the direct evidence of the fact in each case is drawn almost
entirely from sources which were not within Bacon's reach.
At the time he wrote, there was no accessible collection of
state-documents resembling Rymer's Fcedera, and apparently
no accessible record by which it could be ascertained at what
precise date the several Parliaments in this reign were called.
The Herald's narrative, which supplies the only positive evi-
dence we have as to the first of these Great Councils, it is
clear that he had not seen. Henry the Seventh's privy-seal,
which contains positive evidence as to the last, is a single
sheet, which may not have been in Sir Robert Cotton's
possession at the time, and if it was may easily have been
overlooked ; and without it, the notice in the old Chronicle,
though distinct and of great weight, would have been hardly
sufficient perhaps to establish the fact. Now if we should
set aside all the evidence, direct or inferential, which is de-
rived from these sources, there would really be no ground
for suspecting the accuracy of Polydore's narrative. There-
fore that Bacon did not anticipate the conjecture, is not in
fact any presumption against it.
Another objection may be drawn from the silence of con-
temporary historians as to the fact, and of the constitutional
writers of the next century as to the practice. It may be
urged, and urged with much appearance of reason, that if
i
APPENDIX I.
369
the calling of a Great Council, such as I suppose these to
have been, was in those days a new or a very unusual thing,
it would have made a noise at the time ; and then how came
Fabyan, or Polydore, or Hall, who were contemporaries, not
to have heard of it ? And that if on the contrary it was a
tiling frequent and familiar to people in the days of Henry
the Seventh, it must have been familiar to students of the
constitution in the days of Elizabeth and James the First;
and then how came Sir Edward Coke, in the fourth part
of his Institutes, to give an elaborate account of the consti-
tution and functions of the Council, without alluding to a
practice of such considerable constitutional importance;1 or
how was it that during the latter half of James the First's
reign, when the government was in continual embarrassment
from the opposition of the Lower House of Parliament, the
experiment of reviving this practice, and calling a " Great
Council" for deliberation and advice, was never (as far as
I know) proposed for consideration or once mentioned, at
least by that name ? 2
Fortunately it is not necessary to answer this question ; for
there is no doubt about the fact. That " Great Councils,"
precisely such as I suppose these to have been, were fre-
quently summoned during the three reigns of the House of
Lancaster, is a fact established by direct evidence altogether
conclusive. In the Proceedings and Ordinances of the Privy
Council, edited by Sir Harris Nicolas in 1834, there is dis-
1 In the first part of the Institutes (ii. 10. 164.) Coke mentions the Mag-
num Concilium, as meaning sometimes the Upper House of Parliament;
and sometimes, when Parliament was not sitting, the " Peers of the realm,
Lords of Parliament, who are called (he says) Magnum Concilium Regis."
But he says nothing of any peculiar function belonging to it, or of the
occasions on which it was called.
2 The Council before which Robert Earl of Essex was charged, heard,
and censured on the 5th of June, 1600; and that before which James's
Learned Counsel recommended that Sir Walter Raleigh should be charged
and heard in 1618; were very like Great Councils both in composition
and in function ; but I do not find any allusion to the precedent in either
case.
vol. xi. 24
CTO APPENDIX I.
tinct mention made of not less than sixteen " Great Coun-
cils" called during the sixty-one years of the Lancastrian
dynasty, and there are traces of more. The latest of which
there is record there was in 1459 ; only twenty-six years be-
fore the accession of Henry the Seventh. And we are not
to conclude, because this is the last recorded, that it was the
last which took place : for the records of the proceedings of
the Council from the end of Henry the Sixth's to nearly the
end of Henry the Eighth's reign are almost all lost ; and
therefore the negative evidence is of no value. Positive
evidence on the other hand is not wanting to show that the
practice was in use at least seventeen years after. Twice in
the Paston Correspondence we meet with news of the Coun-
cil then sitting ; which on both occasions the editor supposes
(see table of contents) to mean Parliament ; though it is cer-
tain that no Parliament was sitting at the time. One is
stated to have ended on the 3rd of March 1473-4, the last
day of Edward the Fourth's 13th year; the other as having
begun on the 13th of February, in his 16th year; that is,
1476-7. See Vol. II. pp. 158. 205. This brings us within
nine years of Henry the Seventh's accession. So that, even
if that were the latest precedent, there would be nothing
strange either in the name or the thing.
Of the distinctive character and functions of these Great
Councils the clearest and most complete description which I
have met with is in Sir Matthew Hale's Jurisdiction of the
House of Lords, published by Hargrave in 1796 j1 but the
1 " This magnum consilium was of two kinds; viz. a magnum consilium
out of Parliament, and a magnum consilium in Parliament. The former of
these was commonly upon some emergent occasion, that either in respect
of the suddenness could not expect the summoning of Parliament, or in
respect of its nature needed it not, or was intended but as preparative to
it But the form of these Great Councils was varied. For some-
times only some few of the prelates and nobility were called to it, and
none of the consilium ordinarium, as claus. 33. E. 3. m. dors. At other
times not only the nobility, prelates, and consilium ordinarium were called,
but also there went out writs to every sheriff to return one knight for each
county, aud to divers cities and boroughs to return one citizen or burgess,
APPENDIX I. 371
fullest and most authentic evidence, and that which comes
nearest to the times in question, is to be found in the records
published by Sir Harris Nicolas.
" They appear to have been summoned (he says) when-
ever a#airs of greater moment occurred than the ' Continual
Council ' thought proper to determine, but were not of such a
nature or suck a degree of importance as to render it advis-
able to bring them before Parliaments The Peers spiritual
and temporal were considered as belonging to the Great
Council of course ; " Lords of the Great Council " appears
to have been one of their titles. And it is probable that in
ordinary cases it was composed (according to Mr. Hallam's
conjecture; "Middle Ages" vol. iii. p. 213.) of these alone,
in conjunction with the members of the "Continual" Coun-
cil. But it is certain that on some special occasions many
commoners were joined with them ; specially selected from
various qualities, professions, and localities, according to the
nature of the question in debate. Thus, in the second year
of Henry the Fourth, on the 20th of July, 1401, letters
were addressed to the " Continual Council," commanding
them (pour certaines chargeantes matires touchantes nous et
notre roiaume) to summon all the Prelates, Earls, and Bar-
ons of the realm, and from four to eight of the most sufficient
and discreet Knights of each County, to attend a Council at
Westminster on the Feast of the Assumption next ensuing.
And a second letter was addressed to them on the following
day commanding that a certain number of Esquires should be
likewise summoned to attend this Council. The object was
as was done clans. 27. E. 3. m. 12. dors, upon the making of the ordinance
of the staple. But this magnum consilium had nothing of legislative power
nor jurisdiction; and therefore the ordinances of the staple were after
enacted by Parliament to supply the defect of a law. I never yet saw any
private petition, or footsteps of jurisdiction exercised by such a Grand
Council. — These Grand Councils have been rarely summoned of late
years; businesses of state being usually despatched by the Privy Council,
and if of very great importance in Parliament. The only Grand Council
that hath been in my remembrance was that at York, at the coming in of
the Scots." — Hale's Jurisdiction of die House of Lords, chap. 2. § 3.
372 APPENDIX I.
to have their advice with regard to the war with France ;
and it appears from a list annexed that the Council was
attended by about 150 Knights and Esquires, besides the
Lords spiritual and temporal. (See Proceedings and Ordi-
nances of the P. C. vol. i. p. 155., and Rymer viii. 213.)
Again, a minute of Council dated the 7th of March,
1442-3, (21 Hen. 6.) directs that there be "made letters
under privy seal to all the King's freemen, and also to the
King's Great Council, to be with the King in his Great
Council at Westminster at the 15th of Pasque, all excita-
tions ceasing, for the good of his realm, lordships, and sub-
jects." (Proceedings and Ordinances, v. p. 237.) The occa-
sion of this was also a French war.
I have selected these two instances as containing the most
distinct mention that I can find of the summoning of persons
who were not members of the King's Council by rank or
office, and of their character and quality. In other cases
they are less distinctly mentioned as " et plusieurs autres" or
" et aliorum ad Mud convocatorum." In others, and indeed
in the majority, there are no traces of the presence of any
persons besides the Lords and the members of the Continual
Council. The questions on which they were summoned to
advise and deliberate were not always questions of peace and
war. Sometimes it was a question of raising money ; as in
the first year of Henry the Fourth, when in order to avoid
the necessity of calling a Parliament and taxing the Com-
mons, it was agreed that the Peers themselves should grant
the King an aid, and that letters of Privy Seal should be
sent to all the Abbots for the same purpose. (See Vol. I.
p. 102.) And again in the third year of Henry the Fifth,
when the Lords temporal, who had undertaken in a previous
Parliament to do the King service in his wars upon certain
terms of payment, consented to allow him a longer day for
the payment, considering that the supplies granted by Par-
liament for the purpose could not be levied soon enough.
(II. p. 150.) In the seventh year of Henry the Sixth, a
APPENDIX I.
373
Great Council was summoned to advise upon a proposal that
the King should be crowned in France, and also upon the
means of supplying a deficiency in the revenue. In his
ninth year a Great Council was summoned to advise upon
the expediency of calling a Parliament. (IV. p. 67.) In the
next year the question of the salary of the Lieutenant of
England was referred to a Great Council. (IV. p. 105.) In
his twelfth year, a proposal having been made for peace with
Scotland by marriage of the King with one of the Scottish
King's daughters, and the Continual Council having consid-
ered the proposition, but not liking to give advice on a matter
of such weight, referred it to the King's uncles ; who in their
turn " doubting greatly to take upon them sole so great a
charge," requested that a " Great Council " might be called
to deliberate upon it. (IV. p. 191.) The minutes of the
Council which was called in consequence (IV. 210-213.) and
which met soon after the siege of Orleans and the beginning
of the English reverses in France, make no mention of this
subject ; but of a dispute between the Dukes of Bedford and
Gloucester, and a question as to the ways and means of rais-
ing 40 or 50,000/. for carrying on the war, according to a
proposition of the Duke of Bedford. In the sixteenth year
of Edward the Fourth, Sir John Paston informs his corre-
spondent (vol. ii. p. 205.) that " yesterday began the Great
Council ; to which all the estates of the land shall come but
if it be for great and reasonable excuses. And I suppose the
chief cause of this assembly is to commune what is best to do
now upon the great change by the death of the Duke of
Burgoyne and for the keeping of Calais and the marches,
and for the preservation of the amities taken late as well
with France as now with the members of Flanders."
It is clear therefore that the reference to a" Great Coun-
cil " of such questions as formed the subject of deliberation
on the three occasions to which my conjecture refers was
quite according to precedent,. It would appear moreover
from the minutes that the proceedings always began with a
374 APPENDIX II.
speech by the Chancellor, setting forth the questions upon
which they were called to deliberate and advise. So that in
all but the name and the account of laws passed (which were
in fact passed by the Parliament that met just before or just
after), Bacon's narrative may be a correct report of the pro-
ceeding in each case.
No. II.
Perkyn Werbeeks his Proclamation
published in the time of his Rebellion in the beginning of the
Reign of H. 7.1
Richard by the grace of God King of England and of
France, Lord of Ireland, Prince of Wales, to all those that
these our present letters shall see hear or read, and to every
of them, greeting : and whereas we in our tender age escaped
by God's might out of the tower of London, and were
secretly conveyed over the sea into other divers countries,
there remaining certain years as unknown ; in the which
season it happened one Henry, son to Edmund Tydder, Earl
of Richmond created, son to Owen Tydder, of low birth, in
the country of Wales, to come from France and entered into
this our realm ; and by subtle false means to obtain the
crown of the same unto us of right appertaining ; which
Henry is our extreme and mortal enemy as soon as he had
knowledge of our being one live, imagined, compassed and
wrought all the subtle ways and means he could devise to our
1 Harl. MSS. 283. fo. 123. b. " The original of this, in an old written
hand, is in the hands of Sir Robert Cotton; 18 August, 1616." — Note in
the hand of the transcriber.
APPENDIX II.
375
final destruction, insomuch as he hath not only falsely sur-
mised us to be a feigned person, giving us nicknames so
abusing your minds, but also to defer and put us from our
entry into this our realm, hath offered large sums of money
to corrupt the princes in every land and country and that we
have been retained with and made importune labour to cer-
tain of our servants about our person some of them to mur-
der our person, us [m'c] and other to forsake and leave our
righteous quarrel, and to depart from our service, as by Sir
Robert Clifford and others was verified and openly proved,
and to bring his cursed and malicious intent aforesaid to his
purpose he hath subtilly and by crafty means levied outra-
geous and importable sums of moneys upon the whole body
of our realm, to the great hurt and impoverishing of the
same : all which subtle and corrupt labours by him made to
our great jeopardy and peril, we have by God's might gra-
ciously escaped and overpassed, as well by land as by sea,
and be now with the right high and mighty prince our dear-
est cousin the King of Scots, which without any gift or other
thing by him desyred or demanded to the prejudice or hurt
of us our crown or realm, hath full lovingly and kindly re-
tained us, by whose aid and supportation we in proper person
be now by God's grace entered into this our realm of Eng-
land, where we shall shew ourselves openly unto you, also
confounding our foresaid enemy in all his false sayings and
also every man of reason and discretion may well understand
that him needed not to have made the foresaid costages and
importune labour if we had been such a feigned person as he
untruly surmiseth, ascertaining you how the mind and intent
of the foresaid noble prince our dearest cousin is, if that he
may find or see our subjects and natural liege people accord-
ing to right and the duty of their allegiance resort lovingly
unto us with such power as by their puissance shall move,
[sic, nowe ?] be able of likelyhood to distress and subdue our
enemies, he is fully set and determined to return home again
quietly with his people into his own land, without doing or
376 APPENDIX II.
suffering to be done any hurt or prejudice unto our realm, or
to the inhabitants of the same. Also our great enemy to for-
tify his false quarrel hath caused divers nobles of this our
realm whom he had suspect and stood in dread of, to be cru-
elly murdered, as our cousin the Lord Fitzwater, Sir William
Stanley, Sir Robert Chamberlaine, Sir Symon Mounteford,
Sir Robert Radclyfe, William Daubeney, Humphrey Staf-
ford, and many other, besides such as have dearly bought
their lives, some of which nobles are now in the sanctuary :
also he hath long kept and yet keepeth in prison our right
entirely well beloved cousin Edward son and heir to our
uncle Duke of Clarence and others, withholding from them
their rightful inheritance to the intent they ne should be of
might and power to aid and assist us at our need, after the
duty of their leigeance. He hath also married by compulsion
certain of our sisters and also the sister of our foresaid
cousin the Earl of Warwick and divers other ladies of the
blood royal unto certain his kinsmen and friends of simple
and low degree, and putting apart all well disposed nobles he
hath none in favour and trust about his person but Bishop
Foxe, Smith, Bray, Lovell, Oliver King, Sir. Charles Somer-
set, David Owen, Rysley, Sir John Trobulvill, Tyler, Robert
Lytton, Gylford, Chamley, Emson, James Hobert, John
Cutte, Garthe, Hansey, Wyot, and such other caitiffs and
villains of simple birth, which by subtle inventions and pill-
ing of the people have been the principal finders, occasion-
ers, and counsellors of the misrule and mischief now reign-
ing in England.
Also we be credibly informed that our said enemy not
regarding the wealth and prosperity of this land, but only
the safeguard and surety of his person, hath sent into divers
places out of our realm the foresaid nobles, and caused to
be conveyed from thence to other places the treasure of this
our realm, purposing to depart after in proper person with
many other estates of the land being now at his rule and
disposition, and if he should be so suffered to depart as God
APPENDIX II. 377
defend it should be to the greatest hurt jeopardy and peril
of the whole realm that could be thought or imagined.
Wherefore we desire and pray you and nevertheless charge
you and every of you as ye intend the surety of yourself
and the^commonweal of our land, your native ground, to put
you in your most effectual devoirs with all diligence to the
Uttermost of your powers, to stop and let his passage out
of this our realm, ascertaining you that what person or per-
sons shall fortune to take or distress him shall have for his
or their true acquittal in that behalf after their estate and
degrees, so as the most low and simplest of degree that shall
happen to take or distress him, shall have for his labour one
thousand pounds in money, and houses and lands to the
yearly value of one hundred marks to him and his heirs for
ever. We remembering these premises with the great and
execrable offences daily committed and done by our foresaid
great enemy and his adherents in breaking the liberty and
franchises of our mother holy Church to the high displeasure
of Almighty God, besides the manifold treasons, abominable
murders, manslaughters, robberies, extortions, the daily pill-
ing of the people by dismes tasks tallages benevolences
and other unlawful impositions and grievous exactions, with
many other heinous offences to the likely destruction and
desolation of the whole realm as God defend, shall put our-
self effectually in our devoir, not as a step-dame but as the
very true mother of the child, languishing or standing in
peril to redress and subdue the foresaid mischief and mis-
rule and to punish the occasioners and haunters thereof after
their deserts in example of others. We shall also by God's
grace and the help and assistance of the great lords of our
blood with the counsel of other sad persons of approved
policy prudence and experience dreading God and having
tender zeal and affection to indifferent ministration of justice
and the public weal of the land, peruse and call to remem-
brance the good laws and customs heretofore made by our
noble progenitors kings of England and see them put in due
378 APPENDIX II.
and lawful execution according to the effect and true mean-
ing they were first made or ordained for, so that by virtue
thereof as well the disinheriting of rightful heirs as the
injuries and wrongs in anywise committed and done unto
the subjects of our realm, both spiritual and temporal, shall
be duly redressed according to right law and good conscience
and we shall see that the commodities of our realm be em-
ployed to the most advantage of the same, the intercourse
of merchandises betwixt realm and realm, to be ministered
and handled as shall more be to the commonweal and pros-
perity of our subjects, and all such dismes tasks tallages
benevolences unlawful impositions and grievous exactions
as be above rehearsed utterly to be foredone and laid apart
and never from henceforth to be called upon but in such
causes as our noble progenitors kings of England have of
old time been accustomed to have the aid succour and help
of their subjects and true liegemen.
Also we will that all such persons as have imagined com-
passed or wrought privily or apertly since the reign of our
foresaid enemy or before anything against us except such
as since the reign have imagined our death shall have their
free pardon for the same of their lives lands and goods, so
that they at this time according to right and the duty of
their allegiances take our righteous quarrel and part and
aid comfort and support us with their bodies and goods.
And over this we let you wot that upon our foresaid
great enemy his adherents and part-takers, with all other
such as will take their false quarrel and stand in their de-
fence against us with their bodies or goods, we shall come
and enter upon them as their heavy lord and take and repute
them and every of them as our traitors and rebels and see
them punished according, and upon all other our subjects
that according to right and the duty of their leigance will
aid succour and comfort us with their powers with their
[lives] or goods or victual our host for ready money, we
shall come and enter upon them lovingly as their natural
APPENDIX III.
379
leige lord and see they have justice to them equally minis-
tered upon their causes: wherefore we will and desire you
and every of you that incontinent upon the hearing of this
our proclamation ye according to the duty of your alle-
giances '-aready yourselves in your best defensible array
and give your personal attendance upon us where we shall
then fortune to be, and in so doing ye shall find us your
right especial and singular good lord and so to see you rec-
ompensed and rewarded as by your service shall be unto
us deserved.
No. III.
CHARACTER OF HENRY VII.
(From the Latin Translation.)
Rex iste (ut verbis utamur quse merita ejus exaequent)
fuit instar miraculi cujusdam : ejus scilicet generis, quod pru-
dentes attonitos reddit, imperitos leviter perceltit. Plurima
siquidem habuit et in virtutibus suis et in fortuna, quae non
tarn in locos communes cadunt, quam in observationes pru-
dentes et graves. Vir certe fuit pius ac religiosus, et affectu
et cultu: sed ut erga superstitionem, pro modo temporum
suorum, satis perspicax, ita interdum politicis rationibus et
consiliis nonnihil occaecatus. Personarum ecclesiasticarum
promotor, erga asylorum privilegia (quae tanta ei mala peper-
erant) non durus. Haud pauca religiosorum coenobia fun-
davit, dotavit ; quibus accedit memorabile illud hospitale
Savoya dictum. Magnus nihilominus eleemosynarius in se-
creto ; quod luculenter indicat, etiam publica ilia opera Dei
gloriae, non suae, data. Pacem se summopere et amare, et
pro viribus procurare, perpetuo prae se tulit. Atque illud in
foederum praefationibus illi frequens fuit ; Pacem, cum Chris-
380 APPENDIX III.
tus in mundum veniret, anyelos prcecinuisse ; cum e mundo
excederet, ipsum Dominum legasse. Neque hoc ei, timori
aut animi mollitiei imputari poterat (quippe qui animosus fue-
rit et bellator), sed virtu ti vere Christianae et morali. Neque
tamen illud eum fugit, a via pacis aberrare ilium, qui earn
nimio plus videatur appetere: itaque famas et rumores et
apparatus belli saepe excitabat, donee pacis conditiones in
melius flecteret. Etiam illud notatu non indignum, quod
tarn sedulus pacis amator in bellis tarn felix extiterit. Siqui-
dem arma et expeditiones ejus neque in bellis externis neque
in civilibus, unquam ei improspere cesserunt; neque noverat
ille quid clades bellica esset. Bellum in adeptione regni,
necnon Comitis Lincolniae et Baronis Audlaei rebelliones, ter-
minavit victoria. Bella Gallica et Scotica pax, sed pax ab
hostibus ultro petita. Bellum illud Britannia?, casus ; mors
nimirum Britanniae ducis. Tumultus Baronis Lovelli, item
Perkini, tam ad Exoniam quam in Cantio, fuga rebellium,
antequam praelium tentarent : adeo ut propria ei fuerit armo-
rum felicitas, atque inviolata. Cujus rei causa haud parva,
quatenus ad seditiones intestinas compescendas, proculdubio
fuit, quod in iis restinguendis personam suam nunquam sub-
traxerit. Prima quandoque pugnae per duces suos transegit,
cum ipse ad suppetias ferendas praesto esset: sed aliquam
belli partem semper ipse attigit. Neque tamen hoc ipsum
omnino propter alacritatem et fortitudinem, sed partim ob
suspiciones, quod aliis parce fideret.
Leges regni in magno honore semper habuit, easque auc-
toritate sua munire videri voluit. Licet hoc ipsum non
minimo quidem ei esset impedimento, ad ea quae voluit pro
arbitrio suo exequenda. Ita enim commode earum habenas
tractavit, ut ne quid de proventibus suis, aut etiam prreroga-
tiva regia, intercideret. Attamen tali usus est temperamento,
ut sicut interdum leges suas ad prasrogativas suae jura tra-
heret et prope torqueret ; ita rursus per vices prserogativam
suam ad legum aequabilitatem et moderationem consulto de-
mitteret. Etenim et monetarum regimen, et belli ac pacis
APPENDIX III.
381
tractates et consilia, et rei militaris administrationem, (quae
onmino absoluti juris sunt) ssepenumero ad Comitiorum Reg-
ni deliberationes et vota referebat. Justitia, temporibus suis,
recte et a3quabiliter administrata fuit ; prceterquam cum rex
lite pars esset ; praeterquam etiam, quod consilium priva-
im regis communibus causis circa meum et tuum se nimis
lisceret. Etenim consessus ille mera erat turn curia et
'ibunal justitiae, praesertim sub regni sui initiis. Enimvero
ilia justitiae parte quae fixa est et tanquam in aere incisa
hoc est prudentia legislatorial prorsus excelluit. Justitiam
suam misericordia et dementia temperavit ; utpote sub
ijus regno tres tantum ex nobilitate poena capitali affecti
mt : Comes nempe Warwicensis, Aulae Regiae Camerarius,
it Baro Audleius. Quamvis priores duo instar multorum
ssent, quatenus ad invidiam et obloquia apud populum.
d ne auditu quidem cognitum erat, tantas rebelliones tarn
)arca sanguinis per gladium justitiae missione expiatas fuisse,
[uam fuerunt duae illae insignes rebelliones, Exoniae et prope
rrenovicum. Severitas autem ilia, satis cruenta, qua in
'imos illos infimae conditionis homines qui Cantium ap-
ilerunt animadversum est, ad faecem quandam populi tan-
lm pertinebat. Diplomata autem ilia generalia, quae gra-
tm prreteritorum rebellibus faciebant, perpetuo arma sua et
>raeibant et sequebantur. Videre autem erat apud eum
liram quandam et inusitatam gratiae larga manu praebitae et
)lane inexpectatae cum suppliciorum severitate alternationem.
Quod quidem, si tanti principis prudentiam cogitemus, minime
iconstantiae aut consiliorum vacillationi imputari poterit ; sed
mt causae alicui secretae, quae jam nos latet ; aut regulae
midam, quam sibi praescripserat, ut rigoris et mansuetudinis
das per vices experiretur. Sed quo minus sanguinis, eo
)lus pecuniae haurire solebat. Atque ut nonnulli satis malev-
)le interpretabantur, in altero fuit continentior ut in altero pre-
leret magis : utrunque enim intolerabile plane fuisset. Natura
►roculdubio erat ad accumulandos thesauros pronior, et divi-
tias plus quam pro fastigio suo admirabatur. Populus certe
382 APPENDIX III.
quibus hoc natura inditum est, ad conservandas monarchias,
ut principes suos excusent, licet saepenumero minus juste in
consiliarios eorum et ministros culpam rejiciant, hoc ipsum
Mortono Cardinali et Reginaldo Braio consiliario imputabat :
qui tamen viri (ut postea luculenter patebat) utpote qui pro
veteri ipsorum apud eum auctoritate et gratia plurimum pol-
lebant, ita ingenio ejus obsecundabant, ut id tamen nonnihil
moderarentur : ubi contra qui sequebantur, Empsonus et
Dudleius, viri nullius apud eum auctoritatis nisi quatenus
cupiditatibus illius servilem in modum ministrabant, viam ei
non tantum praeberent, verum etiam sternerent, ad eas op-
pressiones et concussiones pro pecuniis undique excutiendis,
quarum et ipsum sub finem vitae sua? poenituit, quibusque
successor ejus renunciavit ; quin et easdem diluere et expiare
connixus est. Iste autem excessus tunc temporis complures
nactus est interpretationes et glossas. Nonnulli in ea opini-
one erant, perpetuas rebelliones quibus toties vexatus fuit
eum ad hoc redegisse, ut odio populum suum haberet. Alii
judicium faciebant, hoc eo tendisse, ut ferocitatem populi
reprimeret, eumque propter inopiam humiliorem redderet.
Alii eum filio suo vellus aureum relinquere cupiisse. Alii
denique, eum cogitationes secretas de bello aliquo externo
animo agitasse. Verum illi forsitan ad veritatem propius
accedent, qui causas hujus rei minus longe petunt, easque
attribuunt naturae suae, aetati ingravescenti, paci quae opes
alit, animoque nulla alia ambitione aut opere occupato. Qui-
bus illud addere placet, eum, quod quotidie per occasiones
varias inopiae mala et dimciles pecuniarum conquisitiones in
aliis principibus observaret, ex comparatione quadam plena-
rum arcarum felicitatem melius agnovisse. Quatenus ad
modum quern servabat in thesauris impendendis, hoc habuit,
ut nunquam sumptui parceret quern negotia sua postulabant :
in aedificando magnificus, in remunerando tenacior : ita ut
liberalitas sua potius se applicaret ad ea quae ad statum suum
proprium aut memoriam nominis sui pertinerent, quam ad
praemia benemeritorum.
APPENDIX III. 383
Fuit ille alti et excelsi animi ; propria^ sententia?, proprii
consilii, amator; utpote qui seipsum revereretur, et ex se
revera regnare vellet. Si privatse conditionis fuisset, super-
bus proculdubio habitus esset : sed in principe prudente nihil
aliud hoc fuit, quam ut intervallum et spatium justum et deb-
itum inter se et subditos suos tueretur ; quod certe erga omnes
constanter tenuit ; nemini propinquum permittendo aditum,
neque ad auctoritatem suam neque ad secreta. A nullo enim
ex suis regebatur. Regina, consors ejus, licet eum compluri-
bus pulcherrimis liberis, quinetiam corona ipsa (utcunque
illud fateri non sustineret), beasset, parum apud eum potuit.
Matrem magna sane reverentia prosecutus est, sed ad partici-
pationem consiliorum suorum raro admovit. Qui vero grati
ob conversationem ipsi forent (qualis fuit Hastingus apud
regem Edwardum quartum, aut Carolus Brandonus postea
apud Henricum octavum) nulli fuerant ; nisi forte inter tales
numeraremus Foxum Episcopum, et Braium, et Empsonum ;
quod eos tam frequenter secum habuit. Sed non alio modo,
quam sicut instrumentum plerunque secum habet artifex.
Glorise inanis, si in aliquo alio principe, minimum in illo fuit ;
ita tamen ut de majestate, quam ad summum fastigium usque
semper attollebat, nihil remitteret; haud ignarus, majestatis
reverentiam populum in obsequio continere, inanem autem
gloriam (si quis recte rem sestimet) reges populari aurse
prostituere.
Erga foederatos suos justum se et constantem prasbuit,
tectum tamen et cautum; sed contra, tam diligenter in eos
lquirebat, se interim ita velans et reservans, ut illi aspice-
mtur, tanquam in lumine positi ; ipse, veluti in tenebris col-
>catus, lateret : absque specie tamen hominis se occultantis,
3d potius libere et familiariter communicantis negotia sua,
me de illorum rebus vicissim percontantis. Quantum au-
im ad pusillas illas invidias et aemulationes (quae inter prin-
dpes, haud parvo rerum suarum detrimento, intercedere
)lent), nihil tale in eo cernere erat ; sed suas res sedulo et
)lide agebat. Atque certissimum est, existimationem ejus
384 APPENDIX III.
domi magnam, in externis partibus adhuc majorem et illus-
triorem fuisse. Exteri enim, qui negotiorum ejus ductus et
vias particulares cernere non poterant, sed summas tantum
et exitus eorum intuebantur, eum perpetuo conflictari et per-
petuo superiorem esse animadvertebant. Partim etiam in
causa erant literae et relationes legatoruin exterorum, qui in
comitatu aulae suae magno nuniero erant. Quibus non tan-
tum comitate, muneribus, et colloquiis familiaribus satisfacie-
bat, verum in colloquiis illis suis baud parva admiratione illos
perstrinxit, cum viderent universalem ejus rerum Europsea-
rum notitiam. Quam licet ex ipsis legatis eorumque infor-
mationibus maxima ex parte hauserat, nihilominus quod ab
universis collegerat admirationi erat singulis. Ita ut magna
semper conscriberent ad superiores suos de prudentia ejus et
artibus imperandi. Imo post reditum eorum in patrias suas,
per literas de rebus omnimodis scitu dignis eum frequenter
certiorem faciebant. Tantae fuit dexteritatis in conciliandis
sibi principum externorum ministris.
Omnibus profecto modis sollicitus erat de procuranda sibi
et obtinenda rerum ubique occurrentium notitia. Quam ut
assequeretur, non tantum exterorum ministrorum qui apud
se residebant industria usus est, atque pensionariorum suorum
quos tarn in curia Romana quam alibi in aulis principum
fovebat ; verum etiam sui ipsius legatorum qui apud exteros
perfungebantur. Quern in finem, mandata ejus usque ad curi-
ositatem diligentissima erant, et per articulos ordine digestos ;
inter quos plures erant plerunque quae ad inquisitionem quam
quae ad negotiationem pertinerent : exigendo responsa particu-
laria et articulata, ad quaestiones suas respectiva.
Quantum vero ad emissarios suos, quos tam domi quam
foras ad explorandas machinationes et conjurationes contra
se initas subornabat ; sane hoc, quo loco res suae erant, ap-
prime necessarium fuit. Tot in eum veluti talpae subter-
raneae perpetuo operam dabant, quo statum ejus labefactarent
et subfoderent. Neque hoc illicitum habendum est. Etenim
si in bello exploratores probantur adversus hostes legitimos,
APPENDIX III.
385
multo magis adversus conjuratos et proditores. Verum ut
fides lmjusmodi exploratoribus concilietur per juramenta, et
per <xeerationes, atque anathemata contra illos tanquam
(lOBtes fulminata, defensionem justam non capit. Sacra enim
ista vestimenta larvis non conveniunt. Veruntamen habebat
lud in se boni industria ista emissarios adhibendi, ut quem-
admodum opera eorum multae conjurationes detectae, ita
etiam fama eorum et diffidentia inde nata plurimae ne ten-
rentur proculdubio cohibitae fuerint.
Maritus erat minime uxorius, ne indulgens quidem; sed
comis, et consortio blandus, et sine zelotypia. Lrga liberos
suos itidem paterno plenus affectu, magnam suscipiens cu-
ram de iis optime educandis ; ad hoc etiam animi quadam
altitudine aspirans, ut conditiones eis dignas et sublimes
procuraret ; honores quoque, quales amplitudinem eorum
condecerent, ab omnibus deferri curavit ; sed non admodum
cupidus ut in oculis populi sui extollerentur.
Ad Sanctius Consilium suum plurima negotia referebat,
ubi frequenter et ipse prsesidebat ; satis gnarus hoc pacto se
via recta et solida insistere tarn ad auctoritatem suam robo-
randam quam ad judicium suum informandum. Ad quern
etiam finem, patiens fuit libertatis eorum, tarn in suadendo
quam in suffragia ferendo, donee animi sui sensum, quem
ad finem deliberationum reservare solebat, declarasset. No-
bilitati suae aliquantum gravis fuit, et ad negotia sua potius
ecclesiasticos et jurisconsultos evehebat ; qui magis ad obse-
quium parati, et apud populum minus gratiosi erant; quod
quidem ut imperiose regnaret profuit, ut tuto non item.
Adeo ut mihi persuasissimum sit, hunc ejus morem fuisse
causam non exiguam crebrarum perturbationum quae sub
regimine suo contigerunt ; propterea quod proceres regni, licet
fidi et obedientes, non tamen alacriter cum eo cooperabantur ;
sed vota ejus magis eventui permittebant quam ad efFectum
urgebant. Nunquam sibi metuit a servis et ministris elatior-
ibus ingeniis et virtutibus prgeditis ; id quod in moribus erat
Ludovico undecimo Galliae regi : sed e contra ad sua negotia
VOL. XI. 26
386 APPENDIX III.
admovit viros qui suis temporibus maxime eminebant ; quod
ni fecisset, fieri non potuit ut res suae tam prospere cedere
potuissent. Hi erant, nimirum in rebus bellicis, Dux Bed-
fordise, Comites Oxoniae, et Surrise ; Barones Daubeney, et
Brookus ; et Poyningus, eques auratus. In rebus autem
civilibus, Mortonus, Foxus, Braius, Prior de Lanthony,
Warhamus, Urswicus, Frowicus, et alii. Neque ei curae
erat, quam vafri et callidi essent quibus negotia committebat.
Putabat enim sui ipsius artes eorum artibus posse praedom-
inari. Sicut autem in ministris deligendis summo judicio
agebat ; ita et in iis quos delegerat protegendis haud minore
utebatur constantia. Mirabile enim quiddam est, quod licet
princeps esset occulti et reconditi sensus, et majorem in
modum suspicax, tempora quoque sua turbulenta et conjura-
tionum plena, spatio tamen viginti quatuor annorum quibus
regnavit nunquam consiliarium aliquem suum aut interiorem
ministrum dejecit aut discomposuit, excepto solo Stanleio,
Aulae suae Camerario. Quatenus vero ad subditorum suo-
rum erga eum affectus, ita res erat ; ut ex tribus illis afFecti-
bus qui corda subditorum erga principes suos devinciunt,
amore scilicet, metu, et reverentia ; ultimo horum eximie
gauderet, secundo mediocriter, tertio autem tam parce, ut
reliquis duobus securitatem suam deberet.
Princeps erat subtristis, serius, et cogitabundus ; quique
secretas in animo suo observationes et curas foveret ; cui
etiam commentarioli et memoriae manu propria scriptae praesto
semper erant, praecipue circa personas : quos nimirum ex
subditis suis ad munia destinaret; quibus prcemiorum debi-
tor esset ; de quibus inquirendum ; a quibus cavendum ; qui
itidem essent inter se maxime aut factione aut meritis col-
ligati, et veluti in partes descendissent ; et similia ; veluti
diaria quasdam cogitationum suarum componens et servans.
Traditur etiam hodie narratio quaedam faceta, cercopithe-
cum suum (ab aliquo ex suis cubiculariis, ut creditum est,
impulsum) die quodam praecipuum ex diariis suis, tunc forte
incuriose positum, in frusta innumera discerpsisse. Ad quod
APPENDIX III. 387
aulici, quibus anxia ilia diligentia minime complacebat, risu
prope disrumpebantur.
Quamvis autem esset apprehensiohum et suspicionum ple-
nus, attamen sicut facile eas admittebat, ita rursus dimittebat,
easque^judicio suo subjiciebat. Unde potius sibi ipsi mo-
lestae, quam in alios periculosae, existebant. Fatendum est
tamen, cogitationes suas tarn fuisse numerosas et complicatas
ut siniul stare saepius non possent, sed quod in aliquibus pro-
desset ad alia obesset ; neque fieri potuit ut adeo ultra mor-
tale prudens esset aut felix, ut rerum pondera justa perpetuo
exciperet. Certe rumor ille qui tot et tantas ei turbas con-
citavit, nempe quod dux Eboraci dimissus et adhuc superstes
fuit, sub principiis vires et fidem ab ipso nactus est ; quia
scilicet hoc credi volebat, ut mollius ei imputaretur, quod in
jure proprio et non in uxoris jure regnaret.
Affabilis fuit, et blanda quadam eloquentia pollens, mag-
naque prorsus uti consueverat verborum dulcedine et ille-
cebris, cum aliquid suadere aut perficere vellet quod enixe
cupiebat. Studiosus magis erat, quam eruditus; libros ple-
runque qui Gallica lingua conscripti erant legens. Licet
Latinae lingua? rudis non esset ; quod ex eo patet, quod Ha-
drianus Cardinalis, et alii, quibus lingua Gallica satis famili-
aris erat, nihilominus Latine ad eum semper scriberent.
Quatenus ad delicias et voluptates hujus regis, muta
prorsus est earum memoria. Nihilominus apparet ex man-
datis illis quae Marsino et Stilo circa reginam Neapolitanam
dedit, eum de forma et pulchritudine ejusque partibus perite
admodum interrogare potuisse. Cum voluptatibus sic agere
solebat, ut reges magni cum mensis bellariorum; pauhsper
eas inspicientes, et statim terga vertentes. Neque enim un-
quam regnavit princeps qui magis negotiis suis deditus esset ;
totus in illis, et totus ex sese. Ita ut in hastiludiis et turnea-
mentis et aliis pugnarum simulacris, nec-non saltationibus
personatis et hujusmodi celebritatibus, potius cum dignitate
quadam et comitate spectator esse videretur, quam iis mag-
nopere capi aut delectari.
388 APPENDIX III.
In eo proculdubio, ut in caeteris mortalibus universis (ac
prascipue in regibus), fortuna influxum quendam habebat in
mores, et mores vicissim in fortunam. Ad culmen regnum
ascendit, non tantum a fortuna privata, quae moderatione eum
imbuere posset, verumetiam a fortuna exulis, quae stimulos
ei industriae et sagacitatis addiderat. Tempora autem regi-
minis sui, cum essent potius prospera quam tranquilla, con-
fidentiam ex successibus addiderant ; naturam interim suam
assiduis vexationibus fere perverterant. Prudentia autem
ejus, per frequentes e periculis emersiones (quae subitis eum
remediis fidere docuerant), versa est potius in dexteritatem
quandam seipsum e malis quando ingruerent extricandi,
quam in providentiam ilia ex longinquo arcendi et summo-
vendi ; sed et indole propria oculi mentis ejus non absimilea
erant oculis quorundam corporalibus, qui ad objecta prope
sita validi sunt, ad remotiora infirmi. Prudentia enim ejus
occasione ipsa subito suscitabatur : atque eo magis, si occa-
sioni accesserit periculum. Atque haec fortuna in naturam
suam potuit. Nee deerant rursus quae natura sua fortuna?
suae imposuit. Nam sive hoc tribuendum sit providentiae
ejus defectui; aut in rebus quas decreverat pertinaciae; aut
suspicionibus, quae aciem mentis ejus perstringebant ; vel
quicquid aliud in causa fuit; certum est, fortunae suae per-
turbationes continuas (praesertim nulla violenta occasione
subnixas) exoriri non potuisse absque magnis aliquibus in
natura sua impedimentis, et erroribus in constitutione animi
sui radicali; quae necesse habuit salvare et emendare per
mille pusillas industrias et artes. Verum ilia omnia aper-
tius se produnt in historia ipsa. Veruntamen, intueamur
licet eum cum defectibus suis omnibus, si quis eum cum
regibus in Gallia et Hispania, contemporaneis suis, conferat ;
reperiet eum Ludovico duodecimo Galliarum regi, prudentia
civili, et Ferdinando Hispaniarum, fide et candore, anteponi
debere. At si Ludovicum duodecimum demas, et Ludovi-
cum undecimum, qui paulo ante regnavit, substituas ; magis
convenient exempla, fierentque verius parallela. Illi enim
APPENDIX HI.
tres, Ludovicus, Ilenricus, et Ferdinandus, pro Tribus Magis
censeri possunt inter illiua astatis principes. Ut verbo con-
cludamus, si rex iste res majores non gessit, in causa ipse
fail sibi ; quicquid enim suscepit, perfecit.
Corpore erat Henricua decoro, statura justa paulo pro-
eerior, erectus, et membrorum compage bona, sed gracilis.
Vultus erat talis quae reverentiam incuteret, et aspectum
viri ecclesiastici aliquantum referret. Et sicut minirae erat
obscurus aut superciliosus, ita neque blandus aut conciliator :
sed tanquam facies hominis animo compositi et quieti: sed
non commoda pictori ; gratiosior scilicet facta cum loque-
retur.
Hujus regis dignitas praecellens pati possit, ut memoren-
tur narrationes quaepiam quae ei divinum aliquid iraponant.
Cum matris ejus Margaretae, foeminae raris virtutibus orna-
tae, nuptias multi proci ambirent ; visa est videre in somniis
virum quendam episcopo similem, habitu pontificali, tradere
ei in manum Edmundum Comitem RichmondiaB. Henrici*
patrem, pro marito. Neque ilia liberos unquam alios con-
cepit, praeter regem, licet tribus maritis nupta. Quodam
etiam die festo, cum Henricus sextus (cui innocentia sancti-
tatem astruebat) a prandio lavaret, oculosque in Henricum,
tunc adolescentulum, conj iceret, dixit : Adolescens iste coro-
nam, pro qua nos confligimus, pacifice tandem possidebit.
Sed quod vere in eo divinum censeri possit, hoc fuit ; quod
non minus fortunam boni Christiani quam magni regis sorti-
tus sit ; vita exercitata, morte poenitenti. Ita ut non magis in
mundanis quam spiritualibus victor triumphaverit ; et militia
ei in conflictibus tam peccati quam crucis prospere cesserit.
Natus est apud castrum Pembrochiae, sepultus apud Wesl-
monasterium, in monumento inter opera Europae pulcher-
rimo et elegantissimo, sive capellam spectes sive sepulchrum.
Adeo ut magnificentius jam in sepulchri sui monumento habi-
tet mortuus, quam vivus aut Riclimondiaa aut in alio quo-
piam palatio suo habitaveiat. Optaverim ut idem ei con-
tigisset in hoc famae sine monumento.
THE
iEGINNING OF THE HISTORY OF THE REIGN
KING HENRY THE EIGHTH.
PREFACE.
The history of, Henry the Eighth was undertaken
by desire of Prince Charles, to whom the history
of Henry the Seventh was dedicated. The under-
taking did not suit very well with Bacon's plans at
that time; for it must have been a long business,
owing to the quantity of original letters and other
documents that had been preserved and must have
been consulted, and he was now anxious to make
the most of his time in pushing on his philosophical
inquiries. He seems to have entered upon it without
appetite and proceeded somewhat reluctantly. He
had some difficulty also in obtaining free use of the
requisite materials. Answering a letter from Tobie
Matthew (then with the Prince and Buckingham in
Spain) dated 26th of June, 1623, he writes, " Since
you say the Prince hath not forgotten his command-
ment touching my history of Henry the Eighth, I
may not forget my duty. But I find Sir Robert Cot-
ton, who poured forth what he had in my former
work, somewhat dainty of his materials in this."
And in sending the Prince a copy of the De Aug-
mentis Scientiarum, then newly published (22nd of
October, 1623), he says, " For Henry the Eighth, to
deal truly with your Highness, I did so despair of
394
PREFACE.
my health this summer, as I was glad to choose some
such work as I might compass within days : so far
was I from entering into any work of length." How
far he proceeded in gathering materials, or at what
time this opening paragraph was written, we are not
informed. But we know from Dr. Rawley that this
was all he ever did of it.
It was published by Dr. Rawley in 1629, in a small
volume entitled " Certain Miscellany works of the
Right Hon. Francis Lord Verulam, Viscount St. Al-
ban." But I have preferred to take the text from a
manuscript copy in the British Museum (additional
MSS. 5503, f. 120 b.) : which I suspect to be a more
original authority.
HISTORY OF THE REIGN
KING HENRY THE EIGHTH.
After the decease of that wise and fortunate King,
King Henry the Seventh, who died in the height of
his prosperity, there followed (as useth to do when
the sun setteth so exceeding clear) one of the fairest
mornings of a kingdom that hath been known in this
land or anywhere else. A young King about eigh-
teen years of age, for stature, strength, making, and
beauty, one of the goodliest persons of his time. And
although he were given to pleasure, yet he was like-
wise desirous of glory; so that there was a passage
open in his mind by glory for virtue. Neither was
he unadorned with learning, though therein he came
short of his brother Arthur. He had never any the
least pique, difference, or jealousy, with the King his
father, which might give any occasion of altering court
or counsel upon the change ; but all things passed in
a still. He was the first heir of the White and of
the Red Rose ; so that there was no discontented party
now left in the kingdom, but all men's hearts turned
towards him ; and not only their hearts, but their eyes
396 HISTORY OF KING HENRY VIII.
also ; for he was the only son of the kingdom. He
had no brother; which though it be a comfort1 for
Kings to have, yet it draweth the subjects' eyes a
little aside. And yet being a married man in those
young years, it promised hope of speedy issue to suc-
ceed in the Crown. Neither was there any Queen
Mother, who might share any way in the government
or clash with the counsellors for authority, while the
King intended his pleasure. No such thing as any
great or 2 mighty subject who might eclipse 3 or over-
shade the imperial power. And for the people and
state in general, they were in such lowness of obe-
dience, as subjects were like to yield who had lived
almost four and twenty years under so politic a King
as his father ; being also one who came partly in by
the sword, and had so high a courage in all points
of regality, and was ever victorious in rebellions and
seditions of the people. The Crown extremely rich
and full of treasure ; and the kingdom like to be so
in short time. For there was no war, no dearth, no
stop of trade or commerce ; it was only the Crown
which sucked4 too hard; but5 now being full, and
upon the head of a young King, it was like to draw
the less.6 Lastly, he was inheritor of his father's rep-
utation, which was great throughout the world. He
had strait alliance with the two neighbour states, an
ancient enemy in former times, and an ancient friend,
Scotland and Burgundy. He had peace and amity
with France, under the assurance not only of treaty
and league, but of necessity and inability in the French
1 comfortable thing. R. 2 and. R.
8 any way eclipse. R. 4 had sucked. R.
5 and. R. 6 Was like to draw less. R.
HISTORY OF KING HENRY VIII.
397
to do him hurt, in respect the French King's designs
were wholly bent upon Italy. So that it may be truly
said, there had been scarcely seen or known in many
js such a rare concurrence of signs and promises
)f a happy and flourishing reign to ensue, as were
iow met in this young King, called after his father's
lame, Henry the Eighth.
THE BEGINNING
HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN.
PEEFACE.
" The Beginning of the History of Great Britain "
was first published in Rawley's Resuscitatio (1657).
At what period it was composed we have no certain
means of knowing. But there is a letter in the same
volume described as a letter " to the King upon send-
ing him a beginning of the history of his Majesty's
times ; " and we may presume that this was the paper
which accompanied it. The letter is not dated. It
is placed however in all the collections among those
which belong to the early part of James's reign ; and
from a passage in another letter to the King, also un-
dated but certainly written while Bacon was solicitor-
general and apparently about the beginning of 1610, I
should conjecture that it was composed a little before
that time. His object in the last-mentioned letter was
to obtain from the King a promise of the attorney's
place, whenever it should be vacant ; for " perceiving
how at this time preferments of law flew about his
ears, to some above him and to some below him," 1 he
had begun to think that, unless he had some better
1 Alluding perhaps to the preferment of " one Bromley, an obscure law-
yer," to a Barony of the Exchequer; of Sir Edward Philips to the Master-
ship of the Rolls, and of Sir Julius Caesar to the reversion of that office:
which was the news of January, 1609-10. See Chamberlain to Carleton ;
Court and Times of James I., vol. i. p. 103-4.
VOL. xi. 26
402 PREFACE.
assurance of advancement in his present course, it
would be better for him to give it over, " and to make
proof (he proceeds) to do you some honour by my
pen, either by writing some faithful narrative of your
happy though not untraduced times, or by recompiling
your laws, which I perceive your Majesty laboreth
with and hath in your head,1 than to spend my wits
and time in this laborious place," and so on.
The letter which accompanied the history runs
thus :
" Hearing that your Majesty is at leisure to peruse
story,2 a desire took me to make an experiment what I
could do in your Majesty's times ; which being but a
leaf or two, I pray your pardon if I send it for your
recreation ; considering that love must creep where it
cannot go. But to this I add these petitions. First,
that if your Majesty do dislike anything, you would
conceive I can amend it upon your least beck. Next,
that if I have not spoken of your Majesty encomiasti-
cally, your Majesty would be pleased only to ascribe it
to the law of an history, which doth not clutter to-
gether praises upon the first mention of a name, but
rather disperseth and weaveth them through the whole
narrative. And as for the proper place of commemo-
ration, which is in the period of life, I pray God I may
never live to write it. Thirdly, that the reason why I
presumed to think of the oblation was because, what-
1 Alluding perhaps to the King's Speech in the Banqueting Hall, 21
March, 1609-10. State Paper Office, vol. liii. (domestic) no. 31. See
also Winwood's Memorials, iii. p. 136.
2 Alluding probably to Camden's Annals of Queen Elizabeth, which the
King was reading and criticising in the MS. about the beginning of 1610,
and of which he sent a considerable portion to the French historian De
Thou towards the close of that year. Compare Bacon's letter to Sir R.
Cotton, 7 April, 1610, with Chamberlain's to Carleton, 29 Jan. 1610-11.
PREFACE.
403
soever my disability be, yet I shall have that advantage
which almost no writer of history hath had, in that I
si iall write of times not only since I could remember,
but since I could observe. And lastly, that it is only
for your Majesty's reading."
I am the more inclined to assign the composition of
this little historical piece to the latter end of 1609 or
the beginning of 1610, because I find no allusion to
it either before or after as one of Bacon's projected
works. And I suppose that he abandoned the design
altogether, either because the King did not encourage
him to proceed, or because, after the Earl of Salis-
bury's death which happened early in 1612, he had no
prospect of leisure ; being fully engaged in the busi-
ness of the day, and all the time he had to spare being
devoted to his philosophy.
Mr. Craik {Bacon and Ms writings; vol. i. p. 213.)
says it was probably written in 1624. But if so Dr.
Rawley would surely have mentioned it in his list of
the works written by Bacon during the last five years
of his life.
As an account of the temper of men's minds at
James's entrance, it is complete ; and in my judgment
one of the best things in its kind that Bacon ever
wrote.
THE BEGINNING
HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN.
By the decease of Elizabeth, Queen of England, the
issues of King Henry the Eighth failed ; being spent
in one generation and three successions. For that
King, though he were one of the goodliest persons of
his time, yet he left only by his six wives three chil-
dren ; who reigning successively and dying childless,
made place to the line of Margaret, his eldest sister,
married to James the Fourth King of Scotland.
There succeeded therefore to the kingdom of England
James the Sixth, then King of Scotland, descended of
the same Margaret both by father and mother ; so that
by a rare event in the pedigrees of Kings, it seemed as
if the Divine Providence, to extinguish and take away
all note of a stranger, had doubled upon his person,
within the circle of one age, the royal blood of Eng-
land by both parents. This succession drew towards it
the eyes of all men ; being one of the most memorable
accidents that had happened a long time in the Chris-
tian world. For the kingdom of France having been
reunited in the age before in all the provinces thereof
406 HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN.
formerly dismembered ; and the kingdom of Spain
being of more fresh memory united and made entire
by the annexing of Portugal in the person of Philip
the Second ; there remained but this third and last
union, for the counterpoising of the power of these
three great monarchies, and the disposing of the affairs
of Europe thereby to a more assured and universal
peace and concord. And this event did hold men's
observations and discourses the more, because the Isl-
and of Great Britain, divided from the rest of the
world, was never before united in itself under one
King ; notwithstanding the people be of one language,
and not separate by mountains or great waters ; and
notwithstanding also that the uniting of them has been
in former times industriously attempted both by war
and treaty. Therefore it seemed a manifest work of
Providence and case of reservation for these times ;
insomuch as the vulgar conceived that there was now
an end given and a consummation to superstitious
prophecies (the belief of fools, but the talk sometimes
of wise men), and to an ancient tacit expectation
which had by tradition been infused and inveterated
into men's minds. But as the best divinations and
predictions are the politic and probable foresight and
conjectures of wise men, so in this matter the provi-
dence of King Henry the Seventh was in all men's
mouths, who, being one of the deepest and most pru-
dent princes of the world, upon the deliberation con-
cerning the marriage of his eldest daughter into Scot-
land, had by some speech uttered by him showed
himself sensible and almost prescient of this event.
Neither did there want a concurrence of divers rare
external circumstances (besides the virtues and condi-
HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN.
407
tion of the person) which gave great reputation to this
succession. A king, in the strength of his years, sup-
ported with great alliances abroad, established with royal
issue at home, at peace with all the world, practised
in the regiment of such a kingdom as mought rather
enable a king by variety of accidents than corrupt him
with affluence or vain glory ; and one that besides his
universal capacity and judgment, was notably exercised
and practised in matters of religion and the church ;
which in these times by the confused use of both
swords are become so intermixed with considerations
of estate, as most of the counsels of sovereign princes
or republics depend upon them. But nothing did
more fill foreign nations with admiration and expec-
tation of his succession, than the wonderful and (by
them) unexpected consent of all estates and subjects
of England for the receiving of the King without the
least scruple, pause, or question. For it had been gen-
erally dispersed by the fugitives beyond the seas (who
partly to apply themselves to the ambition of foreign-
ers, and partly to give estimation and value to their
own employments, used to represent the state of Eng-
land in a false light), that after Queen Elizabeth's de-
cease there must follow in England nothing but confu-
sions, interreigns, and perturbations of estate ; likely
far to exceed the ancient calamities of the civil wars
between the houses of Lancaster and York, by how
much more the dissensions were like to be more mor-
tal and bloody when foreign competition should be
added to domestical, and divisions for religion to mat-
ter of title to the crown. And in special, Parsons the
Jesuit, under a disguised name, had not long before
published an express treatise, wherein whether his mal-
408 HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN.'
ice made him believe his own fancies, or whether he
thought it the fittest way to move sedition, like evil
spirits which seem to foretell the tempest they mean to
move, he laboured to display and give colour to all the
vain pretences and dreams of succession which he
could imagine ; and thereby had possessed many
abroad, that knew not the affairs here, with those his
vanities. Neither wanted there here within this realm
divers persons both wise and well affected, who though
they doubted not of the undoubted right, yet setting
before themselves the waves of people's hearts (guided
no less by sudden temporary wTinds than by the natural
course and motion of the waters), were not without
fear what mought be the event. For Queen Elizabeth,
being a Prince of extreme caution, and yet one that
loved admiration above safety, and knowing the decla-
ration of a successor mought in point of safety be dis-
putable, but in point of admiration and respect assur-
edly to her disadvantage, had from the beginning set it
down for a maxim of estate to impose a silence touch-
ing succession. Neither was it only reserved as a
secret of estate, but restrained by severe laws, that no
man should presume to give opinion or maintain argu-
ment touching the same ; so though the evidence of
right drew all the subjects of the land to think one
thing, yet the fear of danger of law made no man
privy to other's thought. And therefore it rejoiced all
men to see so fair a morning of a kingdom, and to be
thoroughly secured of former apprehensions ; as a man
that awaketh out of a fearful dream. But so it was,
that not only the consent but the applause and joy was
infinite and not to be expressed throughout the realm
of England upon this succession ; whereof the consent
HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN'. 409
(no doubt) may be truly ascribed to the clearness of
the right ; but the general joy, alacrity, and gratula-
tion were the effects of differing causes. For Queen
Elizabeth, though she had the use of many both virtues
and ^demonstrations that mought draw and knit unto
her the heart of her people, yet nevertheless carrying a
hand restrained in gift and strained in points of prerog-
ative, could not answer the votes either of servants or
subjects to a full contentment ; especially in her latter
days, when the continuance of her reign (which ex-
tended to five and forty years) mought discover in
people their natural desire and inclination towards
change ; so that a new court and a new reign were not
to many unwelcome. Many were glad, and especially
those of settled estate and fortunes, that the fears and
incertainties were overblown and that the dye was
cast : others that had made their way with the King
or offered their service in the time of the former
Queen, thought now the time was come for which
they had prepared : and generally all such as had any
dependance upon the late Earl of Essex (who had min-
gled the secrecy of his own ends with the popular pre-
tence of advancing the King's title) made account
their cause was amended. Again such as mought mis-
doubt they had given the King any occasion of dis-
taste, did continue1 by their forwardness and confi-
dence to shew it was but their fastness to the former
government, and that those affections ended with the
time. The Papists nourished their hopes by collating
the case of the Papists in England and under Queen
Elizabeth and the case of the Papists in Scotland under
the King ; interpreting that the condition of them in
1 So in the original. Bacon probably wrote " contend."
410 HISTORY OF GREAT BRITAIN.
Scotland was the less grievous, and divining of the?
King's government here accordingly ; besides the com-
fort they ministered themselves from the memory of
the Queen his mother. The ministers, and those
which stood for the Presbytery, thought their cause
had more sympathy with the discipline of Scotland
than the hierarchy of England, and so took themselves
to be a degree nearer their desires. Thus had every
condition of persons some contemplation of benefit
which they promised themselves ; overreaching per-
haps, according to the nature of hope, but yet not
without some probable ground of conjecture. At
which time also there came forth in print the King's
book, entitled BaoiMnbv Atipov, containing matter of in-
struction to the Prince his son touching the office of a
king ; which book falling into every man's hand filled
the whole realm as with a good perfume or incense
before the King's coming in. For being excellently
written, and having nothing of affectation, it did not
only satisfy better than particular reports touching the
King's disposition ; but far exceeded any formal or
curious edict or declaration which could have been de-
vised of that nature, wherewith Princes at the begin-
ning of their reigns do use to grace themselves, or at
least express themselves gracious, in the eyes of their
people. And this was, for the general, the state and
constitution of men's minds upon this change. The
actions themselves passed in this manner, etc.
[The rest is wanting.]
JX
FELICEM MEMOEIAM
ELIZABETHS.
PREFACE.
The earliest notice of the following piece which I
have met with is in a letter from Mr. John Cham-
berlain to Mr. Dudley Carleton, dated December 16,
1608. " I come even now," he says, " from reading
a short discourse of Queen Elizabeth's life, written in
Latin by Sir Francis Bacon. If you have not seen
nor heard of it, it is worth your enquiry ; and yet me-
thinks he doth languescere towards the end, and falls
from his first pitch : neither dare I warrant that his
Latin will abide test or touch." 1
About the same time, or not long after, Bacon him-
self sent a copy of it to Sir George Carew, then ambas-
sador in France, with a letter which, though undated,
enables us to fix the composition of it with tolerable
certainty in the summer of 1608. " This last summer
vacation (he says), by occasion of a factious book that
endeavoured to verify Misera Foemina (the addition of
the Pope's Bull) upon Queen Elizabeth, I did write a
few lines in her memorial ; which I thought you would
be well pleased to read, both for the argument and
because you were wont to bear affection to my pen.
Verum ut aliud ex alio, if it came handsomely to pass,
I would be glad the President De Thou (who hath
1 Court and Times of James I., i. 83.
414 PREFACE.
written a history, as you know, of that fame and dili-
gence) saw it ; chiefly because I know not whether it
may not serve him for some use in his story ; wherein
I would be glad he did right to the truth and to the
memory of that Lady, as I perceive by that he hath
already written he is well inclined to do."
In answering a letter from Tobie Matthew dated
February 10 [1608-9], Bacon sent him also a copy
of this tract ; with the following remarks. " I send
you also a memorial of Queen Elizabeth, to requite
your eulogy of the late Duke of Florence's felicity.
Of this when you were here I shewed you some
model ; at what time methought you were more will-
ing to hear Julius Caesar 1 than Queen Elizabeth com-
mended. But this which I send is more full, and hath
more of the narrative : and further hath one part that
I think will not be disagreeable either to you or to that
place ; being the true tract of her proceedings tow-
ards the Catholics, which are infinitely mistaken. And
though I do not imagine they will pass allowance there,
yet they will gain upon excuse." Tobie Matthew, who
had joined the Catholic Church not long before, could
not quite allow this part himself, and appears to have
taken exceptions to it in his reply. Upon which Bacon
writes again, apparently in the summer of 1609, " For
that of Queen Elizabeth, your judgment of the temper
and truth of that part which concerns some of her for-
eign proceedings, concurs fully with the judgment of
others to whom I have communicated part of it ; and
as things go, I suppose they are likely to be more and
1 Alluding possibly to the Imago Civilis Julii Ccesaris ; the piece which
stands next but one in this volume, and of which we know nothing but
that Dr. Rawley found it among Bacon's papers, and printed it along with
the Opuscula Phihsophica in 1658.
PREFACE.
415
more justified and allowed. And whereas you say, for
some other part, that it moves and opens a fair occa-
sion and broad way into some field of contradiction, on
the other side it is written to me from the lieger at
Paria~[Sir G. Carew] and some others also, that it
carries a manifest impression of truth with it, and that
it even convinces as it grows. These are their very
words ; which I write not for mine own glory, but to
show what variety of opinion rises from the dispositions
of several readers. And I must confess my desire to
be, that my writings should not court the present time
or some few places, in such sort as might make them
either less general to persons or less permanent in fu-
ture ages." Upon this Matthew seems to have writ-
ten a rejoinder on the 4th of August, to which Bacon
merely replies, " As for the memorial of the late de-
ceased Queen, I will not question whether you be to
pass for a disinteressed man or no ; I freely confess
myself am not, and so I leave it."
" This work," says Dr. Rawley writing in 1657,
" his Lordship so much affected that he had ordained
by his last will and testament to have had it published
many years since ; but that singular person entrusted
therewith soon after deceased, and therefore it must
expect a time to come forth amongst his Lordship's
other Latin works : " 1 — alluding to the volume of
Opuscula philosophica which was published in the next
year, and in which it first appeared.
The will of which Dr. Rawley speaks, and of which
Tenison has given an extract in the Baconiana, was
probably a draft only, not a copy ; for in Bacon's
last will there is no mention of this piece. And as in
1 Epistle to the Reader, in the Resuscitatio.
416 PREFACE.
that draft it is distinguished from his other papers by
the expression of a particular wish that it should be
published, it is not improbable that he had proceeded
to take special measures to secure that object, by put-
ting it into the hands of that " singular person " to
whom Dr. Rawley alludes. This would account for
the omission of the clause relating to it in his last will
of all, and also for the separation of the manuscript
from his other papers, and afterwards (upon the death
of the person entrusted with it) for its being locked up
or mislaid. Considering moreover that it related to
state affairs with which Bacon's official position had
made him acquainted, he may have thought that it
ought not to be published without the sanction of a
Privy Councillor, — for we know that he had this
scruple with regard to the publication of his own let-
ters ; 1 — and among all the Privy Councillors then
living the man whom he would most naturally select
for such a trust was his old and much revered friend
Bishop Andrews, who survived him only by a few
months. This is only a guess ; but if true, it explains
why Bacon did not propose to include this piece among
his Opera Moralia et Civilia (though that indeed might
be sufficiently accounted for by the probability that it
would have caused the volume to be prohibited in
Italy), and how the publication of it came to be so
long delayed.
But however this may be, the fact with which we
are principally concerned is the value which Bacon
1 " Also whereas I have made up two register-books, the one of my ora-
tions or speeches, the other of my epistles or letters, whereof there may
be use, and yet because they touch upon business of state they are not fit
to be put into the hands but of some counsellor, I do devise and bequeathe
them," &c — Last Will.
PREFACE. 417
bimself set upon it: and of this the draft of the will
affords conclusive evidence. The work is important,
because it relates to a series of proceedings which
Bacon had watched almost from the beginning with
anxious interest and from a position very favourable
for observation ; and because it was written at a time
when he could have had no other motive in writing it
than a wish to bear witness to what he believed to be
the truth. For though I do not myself believe that
which has been commonly asserted, upon the evidence,
I think, chiefly of strangers or slanderers, — that the
depreciation of Elizabeth was popular at court, — there
was certainly nothing to be gained by flattering her.
And if Bacon was not a disinterested witness, as he
confesses he was not, it was only because the impres-
sion which her character and conduct had made upon
him was so favourable that he had grown partial ; and
this very partiality must be accepted as a historical
fact, — not the least significant among the many testi-
monies which history bears in her favour.
It cannot have been for its literary merit that Bacon
especially valued this writing ; for the style is more
than usually hasty and careless, and there is some
truth in Mr. Chamberlain's criticism that it falls off a
little towards the end ; a defect which a very little
trouble would have removed.
The passage in which he alludes to the death of
Anne Boleyn is interesting ; and the more so because
his argument did not oblige him to make any allusion
to it, and he appears to me to have gone purposely out
of his way to bring it in. Had his argument required
him to show that the felicity of Elizabeth began with
her parents, the case would have been desperate. Her
vol. xi. 27
418 PREFACE.
mother having been put to death by her father upon a
charge of incest and adultery, there must have been
either the most awful guilt in one of them or the most
awful calamity to both. And therefore when I find
Bacon, in an argument designed to prove the constant
felicity of Elizabeth's fortune, deliberately and unneces-
sarily introducing such a topic, — I say unnecessarily,
because it is brought in only with reference to the
question as to the " dignity of her birth," that is
whether she was really a king's daughter, — I con-
clude that he was only making an occasion to place on
record Anne's last message (which he afterwards in-
serted in his collection of Apophthegms) and his own
opinion of her innocence.
What weight is due to that opinion, one cannot well
say without knowing how much he knew of the cir-
cumstances. There was naturally a strong inclination
on the part of the Protestants in Elizabeth's time to
believe Anne Boleyn innocent. This inclination would
naturally be exasperated into passion by the slanders
and invectives of the Catholics. Of the evidence pro-
duced at the trial there was no accessible record, and
the position of Elizabeth herself between her father's
memory and her mother's forbade the question to be
openly or freely discussed. It is probable therefore
that his impression was formed upon rumours and
charitable surmises of no very authentic or trustworthy
character ; and that of the nature of the direct evi-
dence he did not know more than we do now. Not so
however with regard to the weight of the verdict. Of
the value to be attached to the judgment of the Peers
in a trial for treason and to an attainder by Parlia-
ment, Bacon must have been a much better judge than
PREFACE.
419
any one can be now, standing as lie did so much nearer
the time, and so well versed as he was in the details
of similar proceedings half a century later. We can-
not suppose him to have been ignorant of the compo-
sitioirof the tribunal which found Anne Boleyn guilty,
and yet it is clear that he did not on that account find
it impossible to believe her innocent. Most true it is
no doubt, as Mr. Froude has well pointed out, that the
assumption of Anne Boleyn's innocence involves an
assumption that not Henry only, but also Peers and
Parliament, were deeply guilty. But it is a grave fact
that Bacon, writing within little more than seventy
years of the time, and being himself a middle aged
man with much experience of courts and Parliaments,
did not regard it as an assumption which must be
dismissed as incredible.
In so far as the balance of probabilities depends
upon our estimate of Henry's personal character, his
judgment is of less importance. Of that (although
he may no doubt in his boyhood have heard some-
thing from his father, who had had opportunities of
personal observation) he probably took his impression
from the popular historians, who had little to guide
them beyond the naked outline of Henry's public pro-
ceedings, and were not in a position to see below the
surface., When the particular difficulties with which
he had to deal were forgotten, and the rapid succes-
sion of violent changes had altered the relative posi-
tion of all parties and the complexion of all interests,
the chronicle of his reign exhibited a series of violent
proceedings, — leagues of amity and marriage alliances
with neighbour kings followed by quarrels and wars,
divorces of wives followed suddenly by fresh marriages,
420 PREFACE.
great ministers suddenly disgraced and executed, pen-
alties of heresy enforced now against Catholics now
against Protestants, — of which the popular interpre-
tation was simple and obvious. To a superficial ob-
server they could but appear as the actions of a man
violent in love and anger, and imperious in will ; and
such no doubt was the general impression of Henry's
character in the beginning of the seventeenth century.
Odious to his contemporaries he certainly was not ;
nor was his memory odious in the eyes of the two
next generations : our modern notion of him being,
I think, of much later date, when his actions were
seen refracted through an atmosphere of opinion en-
tirely changed. But though of the Protestant histo-
rians who wrote before the Commonwealth those who
censure his actions most freely speak with affection
as well as respect of the man, I suppose none of them
would have disputed Bacon's assertion that he was
a man by nature extremely prone both to love and
jealousy, and that his attachment to Jane Seymour
preceded his anger against Anne Boleyn. Taking
the simple sequence of events, this is the natural ex-
planation of them. It is quite possible however that
it is not the true one. In these times, when the pro-
ceedings of the government are called in question,
the first thing is to ask for the " papers " relating to
them : till these are produced it is felt that the case
cannot be judged. Now the papers relating to the
transactions of Henry the Eighth were not produced
till long after the popular judgment had been formed ;
the most important part of them only within the last
few years ; and it seems that they suggest a new read-
ing of his character in many points ; showing among
PREFACE. 421
other things that the imputation of a " natura ad
amoves propensissima " must be given up. This is
not the place for a discussion of the question, but it
is proper that Bacon's opinion, which would otherwise
be of great value in such a matter, should be taken
with this caution. There can be no doubt that Mr.
Froude's plea for a reconsideration of the judgment
is reasonable, and that he has asked some questions
which it is at least very difficult to answer.
For the text of this piece I have used two authori-
ties, each of which may be considered as original and
independent. One is Dr. Rawley's edition, printed
along with the Opuscula Philosophical in 1658, with
the title Opus illustre in felicem memoriam FJUzabethce,
Anglice, Regince, auctore nobilissimo heroe Francisco
JBacono, Barone de Verulamio, Vicecomite Sancti Al-
bania multis retro annis prcelo designatum, sed non
antehac in lucem editum ; the other is a manuscript
copy in the British Museum (Harl. 6797. fo. 79.),
written in the hand of one of Bacon's own people,
though it bears no traces of revision by Bacon him-
self. It cannot, I think, have been the same which
Rawley used; and as he gives no particulars about
the one which he did use, we are left to decide for
ourselves which is the best, from internal evidence.1
My own impression is that Rawley's manuscript must
have been the less perfect, and that some of the dif-
1 The following sentence contains all that he says ahout it. " His mon-
umentum illud Regium, cui titulus In felicem memoriam Elizabethan AnglixB
Regince, inter opera civilia primum adjunxi, ante annos complnres ab ipso
honoratissimo auctore (si Deus annuisset) typis designatum: Caeterum
quamvis obdormisse diu non tamen penitus expirasse jam compertuin
422 PREFACE.
ferences which appear in his printed copy are correc-
tions or conjectural emendations of his own. Where
the two copies differ therefore and the true reading
seems doubtful, I have generally preferred that of
the manuscript ; but in all cases, whichever I have
received into the text, I have given the other in the
notes ; and therefore every reader can choose for him-
self.
As the principal pieces which belong to this divis-
ion of Bacon's works are English, the Latin pieces
being few and comparatively short and not connected
with one another, I have thought it better to print
the translation of each immediately after the original,
instead of collecting them into a body at the end ; and
as this is the first for the translation of which I am
myself solely responsible, I shall add here a few words
to explain the principle upon which I have attempted
to do them.
My object in all my attempts at translation being,
not to help a Latin reader to construe the original, but
to put English readers in possession of the sense of it,
my plan has been first to take as clear an impression
as I could of the meaning and effect of the Latin, and
then to reproduce that meaning in the best and clear-
est and most readable English that I could command :
not tying myself to the particular form which the
Latin sentence assumes, even where it could be pre-
served without awkwardness or obscurity, — nor even
preferring it, — but always adopting that form in
which I could best express the thing; keeping my-
self as faithful as possible to the effect of the orig-
inal,— not the literal and logical meaning only, but
the effect upon the imagination and the feelings, —
FREFACE.
423
and leaving myself as free as possible with regard to
the mode of bringing it out. How far I have suc-
ceeded it is for others to say; but my endeavour has
been to produce a translation from the perusal of
whiclr the reader shall rise with the same feelings
with which he would have risen from the perusal of
the original had the language of it been familiar to
him.
I am of course aware that there are not only many
people who would prefer for their own purposes a dif-
ferent kind of translation, but also some real objections
to this kind which upon the whole nevertheless I pre-
fer myself. Whether I have judged rightly, is a ques-
tion which can only be determined by the effect upon
readers generally. If my translations give a livelier
and juster impression of the original, it will be found
that most people like them better.
IN
FELICEM IEMOBIAI ELIZABETHS
ANGLIC REGINiE.1
Elizabetha et natura et fortuna mirabilis inter
foeminas, memorabilis inter principes fuit. Neque haec
res indicium monachi alicujus, aut hujusmodi censoris
umbratilis desiderat. Nam isti homines, stylo acres,
judicio impares, et partis sua? memores, rerum minus
fideles testes sunt. Ad principes viros pertinet haec
cognitio, atque ad eos qui imperiorum gubernacula
tractarunt, et rerum civilium ardua et arcana norunt.
Rarum in omni memoria est 2 muliebre imperium ;
rarior in eo felicitas ; rarissima cum felicitate diutur-
nitas. Ilia vero quadragesimum quartum regni sui
annum complevit ; neque tamen felicitati suae superstes
fuit. De hac felicitate pauca dicere institui ; neque
in laudes excurrere. Nam laudem 3 homines tribuunt,
felicitatem Deus.
Primum in parte felicitatis pono, quod ad imperato-
rium fastigium a privata fortuna evecta est.4 Siquidem
hoc in moribus et opinionibus hominum penitus insedit,
i Harl. MSS. 6797. fo. 79.
8 laudem enim. R.
2 est memoria.
* sit. R.
426 IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS.
ut quae praster spem et expectationem eveniunt majori
felicitati deputentur ; sed non hoc est quod volo. Illud
intueor ; principes qui in domo regnatrice et ad spem
successionis non dubiam nutriti sunt, ab educationis
indulgentia et licentia depravatos, plerumque et minus
capaces et minus moderatos evadere. Itaque optimos
et excellentissimos reges reperias, quos utraque fortuna
erudiit. Talis apud nos fuit Henricus septimus, et
apud Gallos Ludovicus duodecimus, qui recenti menio-
ria et eodem fere tempore non tantum a privata, sed
etiam ab adversa et exercita fortuna, regnum accepere ;
atque ille prudentia, hie justitia floruere. Similis fuit
et hujusce principis ratio ; cujus initia et spes variavit
fortuna, ut in principatu ad extremum erga illam con-
stans et aequabilis esset. Nam Elizabetha natalibus
suis successioni destinata, dein l exhasredata, turn post-
habita fuit. Eadem regno fratris fortuna magis pro-
pitia et serena, regno sororis magis turbida et ancipiti
usa est. Neque tamen ex vinculis subito in regnum
assumpta est, ut ab infortunio exacerbata intumesceret ;
sed libertati restituta, et expectatione aucta, turn de-
mum regnum sine tumultu aut competitore placide et
felicissime obtinuit. Atque haec ideo adducimus, ut
appareat Divinam Providentiam, optimam prineipem
meditatam, per istiusmodi disciplinae gradus earn prae-
parasse et extulisse. Neque sane natalium dignitati
calamitas matris obesse debet ; cum praesertim satis con-
stet Henricum octavum prius amori novo quam irae
ad versus Ann am indulsisse ; ejusque regis natura et ad
amores et ad suspiciones propensissima, et in iisdem
usque ad sanguinem praeceps, posteritatis notam non
efFugiat. Adde, quod criminatione, vel personae ipsius
1 deinde. R.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 427
ad quern referebatur nomine, minus probabili et tenuis-
simis conjecturis innixa, circumventa erat ; quod et
fama etiam turn occulto ut solet murmure excepit, et
Anna ipsa celso animo et memorabili voce sub tempus
mortis suae detestata 1 est. Nacta enim nuntium ut ex-
istimabat et fidum et benevolum, eadem hora qua ad
mortem se parabat hujusmodi mandata ad regem perfe-
renda dedit: Regem in ipsa novis honoribus cumulanda
institutum suum optime servare et perpetuo tueri ; cum
illam primum, generosa stirpe ortam sed nobilitatis
titulis non insignitam, dignitate marchionissae ornasset,
deinde in reginam et consortem suam 2 accepisset ; et
postremo, quia non restabat terreni honoris gradus
altior, innocentem ad coronam martyrii evehere volu-
isset. Atqui nuntius ille ad regem alio amore flagran-
tem hoc perferre non ausus est ; sed fama veritatis
vindex ad posteros pertulit.
Atque non exigua 3 pars felicitatis Elizabethan, etiam
mensura ac veluti curriculum ipsum regni4 sui nobis
visum est : non tantum quia diuturnum, sed quia spa-
tium illud aetatis suae occupavit, quod rerum moderam-
ini et habenis regni flectendis et moliendis aptissimum
esset. Annos enim viginti quinque (qua aetate cura-
tura finitur) nata cum regnare inciperet, ad septuages-
imum aetatis annum imperium produxit. Itaque nee
pupillae detrimenta et aliena arbitria, nee rursus exactae
et aegrae senectutis incommoda experta est. Senectus
autem, etiam privatis, miseriarum satis ; sed regibus,
praeter communia aetatis mala, adhuc status sui declina-
tiones et inglorios exitus afferre solet. Nemo enim fere
in regno ad multam et invalidam senectutem pertingit,
1 protestata. R. 2 jn regni et thori consortium. R.
8 non exigua sane. R. 4 regiminis. R.
428 IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS.
quin aliquam imperii et existimationis diminutionem *
patiatur. Cujus rei exemplum maxime eminet in Phi-
lippo secundo rege Hispaniarum, principe potentissimo
et imperandi peritissimo ; qui extremis suis temporibus
et fessa aetate hoc quod diximus penitus sensit, ideoque
prudentissimo consilio se rerum conditioni submisit ;
territoriis in Galliis acquisitis se ipse mulctavit, pacem
ibidem firmavit, alibi tentavit, ut res compositas atque
integra omnia posteris relinqueret. Contra, Elizabethan
fortuna tarn constans et valida fuit, ut nee ulla rerum
declinatio vergentem certe, sed tamen adhuc vigentem,
aetatem sequeretur : atque insuper, in signum felicitatis
suae certissimum, non prius diem obiret2 quam de
defectione in Hibernia prospero praelii eventu decretum
esset ; ne gloria ejus aliqua ex parte deformata et im-
perfecta videretur.
Etiam 3 illud cogitandum censeo, in quali populo
imperium tenuerit. Si enim in Palmyrenis, aut Asia
imbelli et molli, regnum sortita esset, minus mirandum
fuisset ; cum effoeminato populo foemina princeps com-
peteret : verum in Anglia, natione ferocissima et belli-
cosissima, omnia ex nutu foeminae moveri et cohiberi
potuisse, summam merito admirationem habet.
Neque haec inclinatio populi sui, belli cupida et
pacem aegre tolerans, obfuit, quo minus perpetuis suis
temporibus pacem coleret et teneret. Atque banc ejus
voluntatem cum successu conjunctam inter maximas
ejus laudes pono. Hoc enim aetati suae felix, hoc sexui
decorum, hoc conscientiae salutare fuit. Tentata pau-
lisper, circa decimum regni sui annum, in partibus
borealibus rerum commotio, sed statim sopita et ex-
1 detrimentum. MS. 2 obierit. R.
8 Et etiam. R.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 429
tincta est. Reliqui anni interna pace, eaque secura
atque alta, floruere.
Pacem autem florentissimam judico duabus de causis,
quae ad meritum pacis nihil faciunt, ad gloriam max-
ime : una, quod vicinorum calamitatibus, veluti flam-
mis lucentibus, magis fiebat conspicua et illustrata ;
altera, quod commodis pacis armorum honor non def-
uit ; cum celebritatem nominis Anglici in armis et re
militari per multa decora non solum retineret, sed
etiam augeret. Nam et auxilia in Belgium, Galliam,
et Scotiam praebita,1 et navales expeditiones susceptae
in Indias, atque ex illis nonnullae per universi globi
terrarum ambitum factae, et classes in Lusitaniam et ad
oras Hispaniae infestandas missae,2 et rebelles in Hiber-
nia saepius concisi et domiti, nihil aut de virtute bellica
gentis nostrae remitti, aut de ejusdem fama et honore
deperire, sinebant.
Aderat etiam gloriae meritum, quod et regibus vicinis
tempestivis ab ipsa 3 auxiliis regnum conservatum est ; 4
et populis supplicibus (pessimo principum consilio)
ministrorum suorum crudelitati et plebis furori et omni
lanienae et vastitati relictis et fere devotis, levamentum
malorum datum est ; per quod res eorum adhuc stetere.
Nee minus consiliis quam auxiliis benefica et salu-
taris haec5 princeps fuit: ut quae regem Hispaniarum
toties de lenienda in subditos suos in Belgio ira, et illis
suo imperio sub tolerabili aliqua conditione restituendis,
interpellavit : et reges Galliae perpetuis et repetitis mon-
itis de edictis suis pacem spondentibus observandis
maxima fide solicitavit. Neque6 negaverim consilio
1 missa. R. 2 submissce. R.
3 ab ipsa om. MS. 4 sit. R.
5 hcec om. R. 6 Non. R.
430 IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. .
ejus successum defuisse. Neque enim prius illud sivit
fatum Europse commune ; ne forte ambitio Hispaniae,
veluti carceribus liberata, in majus * regnorum et re-
rumpublicarum orbis Christiani detrimentum (ut tunc
res erant) se effunderet. Hoc etiam posterius non
sivit sanguis tot innocentium cum uxoribus et liberis ad
focos et cubilia sua per infimam plebis faecem, ut bel-
luas quasdam publica auctoritate et animatas et armatas
et missas, effusus ; qui ut regnum tarn nefario scelere
obligatum mutuis caedibus et contrucidationibus expia-
retur, in ultionem poscebat. Ilia tamen utcunque
officium foederatae et prudentis et benevolae praestitit.
Alia etiam subest causa, cur pacem ab Elizabetha
cultam et conservatam admiremur: ea nimirum, quod
non a temporum inclinatione sed ab ejus prudentia et
rebus bene ordinatis pax ista profecta est.2 Nam cum
et interna factione ob causam religionis laboraret, et
hujus regni robur et praesidium universas Europaa in-
star propugnaculi esset adversus regis Hispaniaa illis
temporibus formidabilem et exundantem ambitionem
et potentiam, belli materia non defuit, verum ipsa et
copiis et consiliis superfuit. Id3 eventus docuit max-
ime memorabilis inter res gestas nostri seculi universas,
si felicitatem spectes. Nam cum classis Hispana,4 tanto
rerum tumore et totius Europaa terrore et expectatione,
et tanta victoriae fiducia, freta nostra secaret,5 nee
naviculam aliquam in mari excepit,6 nee villulam ali-
quam incendio vastavit, nee littus omnino attigit : sed
praelio fusa, misera fuga et crebris naufragiis dissipata
est ; atque pax Anglico solo et finibus immota et incon-
cussa mansit.
1 majus om. R. 2 sn. R.
8 Istud. R. 4 Hispanica. R.
5 sulcaret. R. 6 accepit. R.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM EUZABETHjE. 431
Nee minus felix in conjuratorum insidiis devitandis
quam in copiis hostilibus devincendis et propulsandis
fuit. Non paucae enim contra vitam ejus conspirations
factae, felicissime et patefactae et disturbatae sunt. Ne-
que ex eo vita ejus magis trepida aut anxia ; non stipa-
torum numerus auctus, non tempus intra palatium
actum, et rarus in publicum processus ; sed secura et
fidens, et potius liberationis a periculo quam periculi
ipsius memor, nihil de consuetudine sua pristina vivendi
mutavit.
Etiam illud notatu dignum videtur, qualia tempora
fuerint in quibus floruit. Sunt enim quaedam secula
tarn barbara et rerum nescia, ut homines, tanquam
animalium greges, imperio coercere nil magnum fuerit.
Haec autem princeps in tempora eruditissima et excul-
tissima incidit ; in quibus eminere et excellere, non
absque maximis ingenii dotibus et singulari virtutis
temperamento datur.1
Etiam imperia foeminarum nuptiis fere obscurantur,
laudesque et acta in maritos transeunt : illis autem quas
innuptae degunt, propria et integra gloria manet. In
illam vero hoc magis cadit, quod nullis imperii adminic-
ulis, nisi quae ipsa sibi comparaverat, fulciebatur. Non
frater uterinus aderat, non patruus, non alius quispiam
e 2 familia et stirpe regia, qui particeps ei 3 curarum et
dominationis subsidium esset. Sed et eos quos ipsa ad
honores evexerat ita et cohibuit et commiscuit, ut sin-
gulis maximam4 complacendi solicitudinem injiceret,
atque ipsa semper sui juris esset.
Orba sane fuit, nee stirpem ex se reliquit ; quod
etiam felicissimis contigit, Alexandro Magno, Julio
1 dabatur. R. 2 e om. R.
8 ei om. MS. •* maxime. MS.
432 IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS.
Caesari, Trajano, aliis ; et semper varie jactatum, et
in contrarias partes trahi et disputari solet ; cum alii
hoc in diminutionem felicitatis accipiant, ne forte
homines supra mortalem conditionem bearentur, si
et in individuo et in speciei propagatione felices es-
sent ; alii autem in cumulum felicitatis rem vertant,
quod ea demum felicitas completa videatur, in quam
fortunae nil amplius liceat ; quod, si posteri sint, fieri
non potest.
Aderant ei et externa; statura procera, corpus de-
corae compagis,1 summa dignitas oris cum suavitate,
valetudo maxime prospera. Superest et illud, quod ad
extremum valens et vigens, nee fortunae commutationes
nee senectutis mala experta, earn quam tantopere sibi
votis precari solebat Augustus Caesar euthanasian facili
et leni obitu sortita sit : quod etiam de Antonino Pio
imperatore optimo celebratur, cujus mors somni alicujus
suavis et placidi imaginem habebat. Similiter et in
Elizabethae morbo nil miserabile,2 nil omninosum, nil ab
humana natura alienum erat. Non desiderio vitae, non
morbi impatientia, non doloris cruciatibus torquebatur :
nullum aderat symptoma dirum aut foedum ; sed omnia
ejus generis erant, ut naturae fragilitatem potius quam
corruptionem aut dedecus ostenderent. Paucos enim
ante obitum dies, ex corporis nimia siccitate, et curis
quae regni culmen sequuntur attenuati, nee unquam
mero aut uberiore diaeta irrigati,3 nervorum rigore per-
culsa, vocem tamen (quod fieri non solet in ejusmodi
morbo) et mentem et motum, licet tardiorem et hebe-
tiorem, retinuit. Atque is personae suae 4 status paucis
1 corporis decora compages. R.
2 atrox. R.
8 atlenuata . . . irrigata. R. which perhaps is the true reading.
4 ejus. R.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 433
diebus tantum duravit ; ut non tanquam actus vita?
novissimus, sed tamquam primus gradus ad mortem
fuerit. Nam imminutis facultatibus in vita diu manere
miserum ; l sed a sensu paulatim sopito ad mortem
properare, placida et clemens vitae clausula est.
Addo et illud in felicitatis ejus cumulum insignem :
quod non tantum nomine proprio, sed et ministrorum 2
virtute, felicissima fuit. Tales enim viros nacta est,
quales fortasse haec insula antehac 3 non peperit. Deus
autem, regibus favens, etiam spiritus ministrorum ex-
citat et ornat.
Restant felicitates posthumae duae, iis quae vivam
comitabantur fere celsiores et augustiores ; una succes-
soris, altera memoriae. Nam successorem sortita est
eum, qui licet et mascula virtute et prole et nova im-
perii accessione fastigium ejus excedat et obumbret,
tamen et nomini et honoribus ejus faveat, et actis ejus
quandam perpetuitatem donet : cum nee ex personarum
delectu nee ex institutorum ordine quicquam magnop-
ere mutaverit : adeo ut raro fllius parenti tanto si-
lentio atque tarn exigua mutatione et perturbatione
successerit. Memoria autem ejus ita et in ore homi-
num et in animis viget, ut, per mortem extincta invidia
atque accensa4 fama, felicitas memoriae cum felicitate
vitae quodammodo certet. Nam si qua ex studio
partium et dissensione religionis vagatur fama facti-
osa (quae tamen ipsa jam timida videtur, et consensu
victa), ea et sincera non est, et perennis esse non
potest. Atque ob earn causam praecipue haec5 de
felicitate ejus et divini favoris notis collegi ; ut malev-
1 miserum habetur. R. 2 ministrorum status. R.
8 ante eum diem. R. 4 incensa. R.
5 hcec qualia sunt.
VOL. xi. 28
434 IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS.
olus aliquis tantis Dei benedictionibus suas maledic-
tiones inserere vereatur.
Si quis autem ad haec, ut ille ad Caesarem, " Quae
miremur habemus : sed et quae ] laudemus expecta-
mus ; " sane existimo veram admirationem quendam
laudis excessum esse. Neque ea quam descripsimus
felicitas ulli evenire potest, nisi qui et a divina chari-
tate 2 eximie sustineatur atque foveatur, ac etiam mori-
bus et virtute banc fortunam sibi aliqua ex parte finx-
erit. Sed tamen visum est pauca admodum quae ad
mores pertinent subjungere,3 in iis solummodo quae
iniquorum sermonibus maxime aditum et fomitem prae-
bere videntur.
Fuit Elizabetba in religione pia et moderata, et con-
stans ac novitatis inimica, Atque pietatis indicia,
licet in factis et rebus quas gessit maxime elucescant,
tamen et in vitae ratione et consuetudine famibari non
leviter4 adumbrata sunt. Liturgiis et divinis officiis,
aut sacello solenniore aut interiore, raro abfuit. In
Scripturis et patrum scriptis (praecipue beati Augus-
tini) legendis, multum versata est. Preces quasdam
ipsa 5 ex occasione et re nata composuit. In Dei men-
tionem vel communi sermone incidens, fere semper et 6
Creatoris nomen addidit, et oculos et vultum ad bu-
militatem et reverentiam quandam composuit ; quod
et ipse saepe notavi. Quod autem quidam vulgaverunt,
earn minime mortalitatis memorem fuisse, adeo ut nee
de senectute nee de morte mentionem aequo animo fer-
ret, id falsissimum fuit ; cum ipsa saepissime, multis
ante mortem annis, magna comitate se vetulam diceret ;
l sed quce. R. 2 gratia. R.
8 adjungere. R. 4 non leviter om. R.
5 ijisa om. MS. 6 et om. R.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 435
et de inscriptione sepulchri, quid sibi maxime placeret,
sermones haberet ; cum diceret sibi gloriam et splendi-
dos titulos minime cordi esse ; sed lineam memoriae
unam aut alteram, quae nomen ejus tantum, et vir-
ginitatem, et tempus regni, et religionis instaurationem,
et pacis conservationem, brevi verborum compendio
significaret. Verum est, cum aetate florenti et liberis
procreandis liabili de successore declarando interpellare-
tur, respondisse, Se linteum sepulchrale sibi vivae ante
oculos obtendi nullo modo passuram. Attamen non
multis ante mortem annis, cum cogitabunda esset, ac,
ut verisimile est, de mortalitate sua meditaretur, et1
quidam ex intimis sermonem intulisset, quod munera
et loca multa et magna in republica nimium diu vaca-
rent, commotior et assurgens, Se certo scire suum
locum ne tantillum temporis vacaturum dixit.
Quod ad moderationem in religione attinet, haerere
videbimur, propter legum in subditos religionis ponti-
ficiae latarum severitatem. Sed ea proferemus quae
nobis et certo nota et diligenter notata sunt.
Certissimum est, hunc fuisse istius principis animi
sensum, ut vim conscientiis adhibere nollet ; sed rursus
statum regni sui praetextu conscientiae et religionis in
discrimen venire non permitteret. Ex hoc fonte, pri-
rnum duarum religionum libertatem et tolerationem
auctoritate publica, in populo animoso et feroce, et ab
animorum contentione ad manus et arma facile veni-
ente,2 certissimam perniciem judicavit. Etiam in novi-
tate regni, cum omnia suspecta essent, ex praesulibus
ecclesiae quosdam magis turbidi et factiosi ingenii, auc-
toritate legis accedente, sub custodia libera habuit.
Reliquis utriusque ordinis, non acri aliqua inquisitione
1 ut. R. 2 venienle admittere. R.
436 IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS.
molesta, sed benigna conniventia praesidio fuit. Hie
primus rerum status : neque de hac dementia, licet ex-
communicatione Pii quinti provocata, quae et indignati-
onem addere et occasionem praebere novi instituti
potuit, quidquam fere mutavit, sed natura sua uti per-
severavit. Nam prudentissima foemina et magnanima,
hujusmodi terrorum sonitu nil admodum commota est ;
secura de populi sui fide et amore, et de factionis
pontificiae intra regnum ad nocendum virium tenuitate,
non accedente hoste externo. At sub vicesimum ter-
tium regni sui annum, rerum commutatio facta est.
Atque haec temporis distinctio non commode ficta, sed
in publicis actis expressa ac veluti in aere incisa est.
Neque enim ante annum eum gravior aliqua poena
per leges prius sancitas subditis suis ] pontificiae reli-
gionis incubuit. Verum sub hoc tempus, ambitiosum
et vastum Hispaniae consilium de hoc regno subju-
gando paulatim detegi ccepit. Hujus pars magna fuit,
ut omnibus modis intra regni viscera factio a statu
aliena et rerum novarum cupida excitaretur, quae
hosti invadenti adhaereret. Ea ex dissensione religi-
onis sperabatur. Itaque huic rei 2 omni opera incum-
bendum statuebant, et pullulantibus tunc seminariis,
sacerdotes in regnum immissi qui studium religionis
Romanae excitarent et spargerent, vim excommunica-
tionis Romanae in fide solvenda3 docerent et4 inculca-
rent, et animos hominum novarum rerum expectatione
erigerent et praepararent. Circa idem tempus, et Hi-
bernia apertis armis tentabatur ; et nomen et regimen
Ehzabethae variis et sceleratis libellis proscindebatur :
denique insolitus erat rerum tumor, praenuntius ma-
1 suis om. R. 2 rei om. R.
sJide subditorum solvenda. R. <• et om. MS.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 437
joris motus. Neque sane dixerim singulos sacerdotes
in participationem consilii assumptos aut quid ageretur
conscios, sed tantummodo prava alienae malitiae instru-
menta fuisse. Sed tamen hoc verum est et multis
confessionibus testatum, omnes fere sacerdotes, qui ab
eo quern diximus anno usque ad tricesimum Elizabethan
annum (quo consilium Hispaniae et pontificium per
memorabilem ilium et classis et terrestrium copiarum
apparatum executioni mandatum erat) in hoc regnum
missi1 erant, habuisse in mandatis inter functionis
officia hoc insuper, ut Non posse haec diutius stare ;
novam rerum faciem et conversionem non ita multo
post conspicuam fore ; curse esse et pontifici et prin-
cipibus catholicis rem Anglicam, modo ipsi sibi non
desint ; insinuarent. Etiam ex sacerdotibus nonnulli
rebus et machinationibus quae ad status labefactationem
et subversionem pertinebant manifeste se immiscue-
rant ; et, quod maxime movit, consilii hujus et negotii
ratio per literas ex multis partibus interceptas 2 pate-
facta est ; in quibus scriptum erat, Vigilantiam reginae
et concilii sui circa catholicos elusam iri. Ulam enim
ad hoc tantum intentam esse,3 ne quod caput in per-
sona alicujus nobilis aut viri primarii catholicorum
factioni se attolleret. At consilium jam tale adhiberi,
ut per homines privatos atque ex inferiore nota, neque
eos inter se conspirantes et conscios, per secreta con-
fessionum omnia disponerentur et praepararentur. At-
que has turn artes adhibebantur, hujusmodi hominibus
(quod etiam nuper in casu non dissimili videre licuit)
usitatae et familiares. Hac tanta periculorum tempes-
1 immissi. R.
2 per lit. ex m.p. interceptas consilii h. et neg. rat. R.
8 esse om. R. \
438 IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS.
tate, lex quaedam necessitatis imposita est Elizabethan,
ut earn partem subditorum quae a se alien ata et per
hujusmodi venena facta erat quasi insanabilis, atque
interim ob vitam privatam a publicis muneribus et
expensis immunem ditesceret, gravioribus legum vin-
culis constringeret. Atque ingravescente malo, cum
origo ejus sacerdotibus seminariorum deputaretur, qui
in exteris partibus nutriti, et exterorum principum,
hujus regni ex professo hostium, opibus et eleemosynis
sustentati essent, et in locis versati ubi ne nomen qui-
dem ipsum Elizabethan, nisi ut haereticae, excommuni-
catae, diris l devotee, audiebatur ; quique (etsi non ipsi
criminibus majestatis imbuti) at eorum qui hujusmodi
sceleribus operam dedissent intimi cognoscerentur ; 2
quique suis artibus et venenis ipsam catholicorum mas-
sam, antea magis dulcem et innoxiam, depravassent
et novo veluti fermento et perniciosa malignitate infe-
cissent ; non aliud inventum est remedium, quam ut
hujusmodi homines ab omni in hoc regnum aditu sub
poena capitis prohiberentur : quod tandem vicesimo
septimo regni sui anno factum est. Neque ita multo
post eventus ipse, cum tanta tempestas hoc regnum
adorta esset et totis viribus incubuisset, horum homi-
num invidiam et odium auxit ; 3 ac si omnem charita-
tem patriae exuissent quam servituti externa? tradere
1 et dhHs. R.
2 agnoscerentur. R.
s quidquam lenibat sedpotius auxit. R. I have preferred the reading of
the MS. because the sentence as given by Rawley is certainly wrong, a
negative being wanted. It seems probable however that the error arose
from some interlinear correction, either imperfectly made or carelessly
read. Perhaps the words ita multo post were intended to be struck out, or
introduced with non after cum ; with either of which alterations the sen-
tence as given by Rawley reads to me more naturally than that in
the MS.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 439
in votis habuissent.1 Ac postea sane, licet motus2 ab
Hispania qui hujus severitatis stimulus erat consedisset
aut remitteretur ; tamen cum et memoria praeteriti
temporis in animis et sensibus hominum alte infixa
maneret, et leges semel factas aut abrogare inconstans
aut negligere dissolutum videretur, ipsa rerum vis
Elizabethan! traxit, ut ad priorem rerum statum qui
ante vicesimum tertium regni sui annum erat revertere
sibi integrum non esset. Hue accessit quorundam in
fisci commodis augendis industria, et ministrorum jus-
titiae qui non aliam patriae salutem quam quae legibus
continetur introspicere aut intueri consueverunt, so-
licitudo ; quae omnia 3 executionem legum urgebant.4
Ipsa tamen, in naturae suae specimen manifestum, ita
legum mucronem contudit, ut pauci pro numero sacer-
dotes capitali supplicio plecterentur. Neque haec de-
fensionis loco dicta sunt, qua res ista non eget : 5 cum
et salus regni in hoc verteretur, et universae istius
severitatis ratio et modus longe infra sanguinaria et
inter Christianos vix nominanda, atque ex iis non-
nulla 6 potius ab arrogantia atque malitia quam a neces-
sitate profecta, pontificiorum exempla steterit. Sed
ejus quod asseruimus memores, Elizabetham 7 in causa
religionis moderatam fuisse, et variationem quae fait,
non in natura sua sed in temporibus existitisse, dem-
onstrasse nos existimamus.
De constantia autem Elizabethae in religione ac
1 This clause (quam . . . habuissent) is omitted by Rawley.
2 metus. R. Which is perhaps right.
8 quidem. R.
4 poscebant et urgebant. R.
6 qua res ista non egent. R.
6 eaque potius. R.
* earn. R.
440 IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS.
ejus cultu, maximum argumentum est, quod rellgionem
pontificiam, regno sororis auctoritate publica et multa
cura impense stabilitam,1 et altas jam radices agentem,
atque omnium qui in magistratibus et cum potestate
erant consensu et studio firmatam ; tamen quandoqui-
dem nee verbo Dei, nee primitivae puritati, nee con-
scientiae suae consentanea esset, maximo animo et pau-
cissimis adjumentis convulsit et abrogavit. Neque id
praaceps aut acri impetu ; sed prudenter et tempestive.2
Idque turn ex multis aliis3 rebus, turn ex responso
quodam4 suo per occasionem facto conjicere licet.
Nam primis regni diebus, cum in omen et gratula-
tionem novi principatus vincti (ut moris est) solve-
rentur, accessit ad earn, ad sacellum turn pergentem,
aulicus quidam, qui ex natura et consuetudine jocaudi
quandam5 licentiam sibi assumpserat. Isque, sive ex
motu proprio sive a quodam 6 prudentiore immissus,
libellum supplicem ei porrexit, et7 magna frequentia
clara voce addidit, Restare adhuc quatuor aut quin-
que vinctos, idque immerito ; illis se libertatem ut rel-
iquis petere. Eos esse quatuor Evangelistas, atque
etiam apostolum Paulum, qui diu ignota lingua tan-
quam carcere conclusi, inter populum conversari non
possent. Cui ilia prudentissime, Sciscitandum adhuc
melius ab ipsis esse, utrum liberari vellent.8 Atque ita
improvises quaestioni suspenso responso occurrit, veluti
omnia integra sibi servans. Neque tamen timide et
per vices haec instillavit ; sed ordine gravi et maturo,
habito inter partes colloquio, et peractis regni comitiis,
1 et stabilitam. R. 2 tempestive fecit. R.
8 aliis multis. R. 4 quopiam. MS.
5 licentiam quandam. R. 6 quopiam. MS.
7 in magna. R. 8 vellent, necne. R.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 441
turn demum (idque intra orbem unius anni vertentis)
ita omnia quae ad ecclesiam pertinebant ordinavit et
stabilivit, ut ne punctum quidem 1 ab illis ad extremum
vitae diem recedi pateretur. Quin et singulis fere
regnr comitiis, ne quid in ecclesiae disciplina aut riti-
bus innovaretur publice monuit. Atque de religione
hactenus.
Quod si quis ex tristibus2 leviora ilia exaggeret,
quod coli, ambiri, quin et amoris nomine se celebrari,
extolli,3 sinebat,4 volebat, eaque ultra sortem aetatis
continuabat : haec tamen, si mollius accipias, admira-
tione et ipsa carere non possunt ; cum talia sint fere,
qualia in fabulosis narrationibus inveniantur, de regina
quadam in insulis beatis ejusque aula atque institutis,
quae amorura admirationem 5 recipiat, lasciviam pro-
hibeat : sin severius, habent et ilia admirationem, eam-
que vel maximam, quod hujusmodi deliciae non multum
famae, nil prorsus majestati ejus officerent ; nee impe-
rium relaxarent, nee impedimento notabili rebus et
negotiis gerendis essent. Hujusmodi enim res se cum
publica fortuna commiscere liaud raro solent. Verum,
ut sermones nostros claudamus : fuit certe ista princeps
bona et morata, etiam talis videri voluit : vitia oderat,
et se bonis artibus clarescere cupiebat. Sane ad men-
tionem morum illius,6 in mentem mihi venit quod
dicam. Cum scribi ad legatum suum jussisset de qui-
busdam mandatis ad Reginam Matrem Yalesiorum
separatim perferendis ; atque qui ab epistolis erat clau-
sulam quandam inseruisset, ut legatus diceret, tan-
quam ad favorem aucupandum,7 Esse nimirum ipsas
1 quidem om. MS. 2 tristioribus. R.
8 et extolli. R. * atque volebat. R.
5 amoris administrationem. R. * suorum. R.
7 occupandum. MS.
442 IN FELICEM MEMOKIAM ELIZABETHS.
duas feeminas principes, a quibus, in usu rerum et
imperandi virtute et artibus, non minora quam a sum-
mis viris expectarentur ; comparationem non tulit, sed
deleri jussit ; Seque artes longe dissimiles et instituta
diversa ad imperandum afFerre dixit. Nee a potestate
aut longo imperio depravata erat ; quin et iis laudibus
maxime delectabatur, si quis hujusmodi sermones instit-
uisset, ut earn 1 etiamsi in privata et mediocri fortuna
aevum traduxisset, tamen non absque aliqua excellentiae
nota apnd homines victuram fuisse, apte insinuaret.2
Adeo nihil a fortuna sua ad virtutis laudem mutuare
aut transferee volebat. Verum si in ejus laudes, sive
morales sive politicas, ingrederer, aut in communes quas-
dam virtutum notas et commemorationes incidendum
est, quod tarn rara principe minus dignum ; aut si pro-
priam ipsis lucem et gratiam conciliare velim, in vitae
ejus historiam prolabendum, quod et majus otium et
venam uberiorem desiderat. Ego enim haec paucis, ut
potui. Sed revera dicendum est ; non alium verum
hujus foeminae laudatorem inveniri posse, quam tempus :
quod cum tarn diu jam volvitur, nihil simile, in hoc
sexu, quoad rerum civilium administrationem peperit.
1 The first clause of this sentence is omitted by Rawley, and the rest
stands thus — Delectabatur etiam haud parum si quis forte hujusmodi ser-
monem intulisset, Earn .... fuisse.
2 The two last words are omitted by Rawley.
ON THE
FORTUNATE MEMORY OF ELIZABETH
QUEEN OF ENGLAND.
Elizabeth both in her nature and her fortune was
a wonderful person among women, a memorable per-
son among princes. But it is not to monks or closet
penmen that we are to look for guidance in such a
case ; for men of that order, being keen in style, poor
in judgment, and partial in feeling, are no faithful
witnesses as to the real passages of business. It is
for ministers and great officers to judge of these things,
and those who have handled the helm of government,
and been acquainted with the difficulties and myste-
ries of state business.
The government of a woman has been a rare thing
at all times ; felicity in such government a rarer thing
still ; felicity and long continuance together the rarest
thing of all. Yet this Queen reigned forty-four years
complete, and did not outlive her felicity. Of this
felicity I propose to say something; without wander-
ing into praises ; for praise is the tribute of men,
felicity the gift of God.
First, then, I set it down as part of her felicity
444 TRANSLATION OF THE
that she was raised to sovereignty from a private for-
tune ; not so much because of that feeling so deeply-
seated in man's nature, whereby benefits which come
unexpected and unhoped for are always counted the
greater blessings ; but because Princes who are brought
up in the reigning house with assured expectation of
succeeding to the throne, are commonly spoiled by
the indulgence and licence of their education, and so
turn out both less capable and less temperate. And
therefore you will find that the best kings are they
who have been trained in both schools of fortune ;
such as Henry the Seventh with us, and Lewis the
Twelfth in France ; both of whom, of late years and
almost at the same time, came to their kingdoms not
only from a private but from an adverse and troubled
fortune ; and both were eminently prosperous ; the one
excelling in wisdom, the other in justice. Much like
was the case of this Queen, whose early times and
opening prospects fortune chequered with uncertainty,
that afterwards when she was settled in the throne it
might prove to the last constant and equable. For
Elizabeth at her birth was destined to the succession,
then disinherited, afterwards superseded. Her fortune
in her brother's reign was more propitious and serene,
in her sister's more troubled and doubtful. And yet
she did not pass suddenly from the prison to the
throne, with a mind embittered and swelling with the
sense of misfortune, but was first restored to liberty
and comforted with expectation ; and so came to her
kingdom at last quietly and prosperously, without
tumult or competitor. All which I mention to show
how Divine Providence, meaning to produce an ex-
cellent Queen, passed her by way of preparation
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 445
through these several stages of discipline. Nor ought
the calamity of her mother to be admitted as an ob-
jection to the dignity of her birth : the rather because
it is clear that Henry the Eighth had fallen in love
with "another woman before he fell in anger with
Anne, and because he has not escaped the censure
of posterity as a man by nature extremely prone both
to loves and suspicions, and violent in both even to
the shedding of blood. And besides, the criminal
charge in which she was involved was in itself, if we
consider only the person to whom it related, improba-
ble, and rested upon the slenderest conjectures ; as
was secretly whispered (as the manner is in such
cases) even then, and Anne herself just before her
death with a high spirit and in memorable words
made protestation. For having procured a messenger
whose fidelity and good will she thought she could
trust, she sent the King, in the very hour when she
was preparing for the scaffold, a message to this effect :
u That he kept constant to his course of heaping hon-
ours upon her ; from a gentlewoman without title he
had made her marchioness ; he had then raised her
to be the partner of his throne and bed ; and now
at last, because there remained no higher step of
earthly honour, he had vouchsafed to crown her in-
nocence with martyrdom." Which words the mes-
senger durst not indeed carry to the King, who was
then in the heat of a new love ; but fame, the vin-
dicator of truth, transmitted them to posterity.
I account also as no small part of Elizabeth's felic-
ity the period and compass of her administration ; not
only for its length, but as falling within that portion
of her life which was fittest for the' control of affairs
446 TRANSLATION OF THE
and the handling of the reins of government. She
was twenty-five years old (the age at which guar-
dianship ceases) when she began to reign, and she
continued reigning till her seventieth year ; so that
she never experienced either the disadvantages and
subjection to other men's wills incident to a ward,
nor the inconveniences of a lingering and impotent
old age. Now old age brings with it even to private
persons miseries enough ; but to kings, besides those
evils which are common to all, it brings also decline
of greatness and inglorious exits from the stage. For
there is hardly any sovereign who reigns till he be-
comes old and feeble, but suffers some diminution of
power and reputation : of which we have a very emi-
nent example in Philip the Second, King of Spain,
a most powerful prince and perfect in the art of gov-
ernment; who in his last times when worn out with
age became deeply sensible of this which I say, and
therefore wisely submitted to the condition of things ;
voluntarily sacrificed the territories he had won in
France, established peace there, attempted the like in
other places, that he might leave a settled estate and
all things clear and entire to his successor. Eliza-
beth's fortune on the contrary was so constant and
flourishing, that not only did her declining, but though
declining still fresh and vigorous years, bring with
them no decline at all in the state of her affairs ; but
it was granted to her for an assured token of her felic-
ity not to die before the fate of the revolt in Ireland
had been decided by a victory ; lest her glory might
seem to be in any part sullied and incomplete.
Nor must it be forgotten withal among what kind
of people she reigned ; for had she been called to rule
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 447
over Palmyrenes or in an un warlike and effeminate
country like Asia, the wonder would have been less ;
a womanish people might well enough be governed by
a woman ; but that in England, a nation particularly
fierce "and warlike, all things could be swayed and
controlled at the beck of a woman, is a matter for
the highest admiration.
Observe too that this same humour of her people,
ever eager for war and impatient of peace, did not
prevent her from cultivating and maintaining peace
during the whole time of her reign. And this her
desire of peace, together with the success of it, I
count among her greatest praises ; as a thing happy
for her times, becoming to her sex, and salutary for
her conscience. Some little disturbance there was in
the northern counties about the tenth year of her
reign, but it was immediately quieted and extin-
guished. The rest of her years flourished in inter-
nal peace, secure and profound.
And this peace I regard as more especially flour-
ishing from two circumstances that attended it, and
which though they have nothing to do with the merit
of peace, add much to the glory of it. The one,
that the calamities of her neighbours were as fires to
make it more conspicuous and illustrious ; the other
that the benefits of peace were not unaccompanied
with honour of war, — the reputation of England
for arms and military prowess being by many noble
deeds, not only maintained by her, but increased.
For the aids sent to the Low Countries, to France,
and to Scotland ; the naval expeditions to both the
Indies, some of which sailed all round the globe ; the
fleets despatched to Portugal and to harass the coasts
448 TRANSLATION OF THE
of Spain ; the many defeats and overthrows of the
rebels in Ireland; — all these had the effect of keep-
ing both the warlike virtues of our nation in full vig-
our and its fame and honour in full lustre.
Which glory had likewise this merit attached, —
that while neighbour kings on the one side owed the
preservation of their kingdoms to her timely succours ;
suppliant peoples on the other, given up by ill-advised
princes to the cruelty of their ministers, to the fury
of the populace, and to every kind of spoliation and
devastation, received relief in their misery ; by means
of which they stand to this day.
Nor were her counsels less beneficent and salutary
than her succours ; witness her remonstrances so fre-
quently addressed to the King of Spain that he would
moderate his anger against his subjects in the Low
Countries, and admit them to return to their alle-
giance under conditions not intolerable ; and her con-
tinual warnings and earnest solicitations addressed to
the kings of France that they would observe their
edicts of pacification. That her counsel was in both
cases unsuccessful, I do not deny. The common fate
of Europe did not suffer it to succeed in the first ;
for so the ambition of Spain, being released as it were
from prison, would have been free to spend itself (as
things then were) upon the ruin of the kingdoms and
commonwealths of Christendom. The blood of so
many innocent persons, slaughtered with their wives
and children at their hearths and in their beds by
the vilest rabble, like so many brute beasts animated,
armed, and set on by public authority, forbade it in
the other ; that innocent blood demanding in just re-
venge that the kingdom which had been guilty of so
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 449
atrocious a crime should expiate it by mutual slaugh-
ters and massacres. But however that might be, she
was not the less true to her own part, in performing
the office of an ally both wise and benevolent.
Upon another account also this peace so cultivated
and maintained by Elizabeth is matter of admiration ;
namely, that it proceeded not from any inclination of
the times to peace, but from her own prudence and
good management. For in a kingdom laboring with
intestine faction on account of religion, and standing
as a shield and stronghold of defence against the then
formidable and overbearing ambition of Spain, matter
for war was nowise wanting ; it was she who by her
forces and her counsels combined kept it under; as
was proved by an event the most memorable in respect
of felicity of all the actions of our time. For when
that Spanish fleet, got up with such travail and fer-
ment, waited upon with the terror and expectation of
all Europe, inspired with such confidence of victory,
came ploughing into our channels, it never took so
much as a cockboat at sea, never fired so much as a
cottage on the land, never even touched the shore ;
but was first beaten in a battle and then dispersed and
wasted in a miserable flight with many shipwrecks ;
while, on the ground and territories of England peace
remained undisturbed and unshaken.
Nor was she less fortunate in escaping the treacher-
ous attempts of conspirators than in defeating and re-
pelling the forces of the enemy. For not a few con-
spiracies aimed at her life were in the happiest manner
both detected and defeated ; and yet was not her life
made thereby more alarmed or anxious ; there was no
increase in the number of her guards ; no keeping
VOL. xi. 29
450 TRANSLATION OF THE
within her palace and seldom going abroad ; but still
secure and confident, and thinking more of the escape
than of the danger, she held her wonted course, and
made no change in her way of life.
Worthy of remark too is the nature of the times in
which she flourished. For there are some times so
barbarous and ignorant that it is as easy a matter to
govern men as to drive a flock of sheep. But the lot
of this Queen fell upon times highly instructed and
cultivated, in which it is not possible to be eminent
and excellent without the greatest gifts of mind and a
singular composition of virtue.
Again, the reigns of women are commonly obscured
by marriage ; their praises and actions passing to the
credit of their husbands ; whereas those that continue
unmarried have their glory entire and proper to them-
selves. In her case this was more especially so ; inas-
much as she had no helps to lean upon in her govern-
ment, except such as she had herself provided ; no
own brother, no uncle, no kinsman of the royal family,
to share her cares and support her authority. And
even those whom she herself raised to honour she so
kept in hand and mingled one with another, that while
she infused into each the greatest solicitude to please
her she was herself ever her own mistress.
Childless she was indeed, and left no issue of her
own ; a thing which has happened also to the most for-
tunate persons, as Alexander the Great, Julius Caasar,
Trajan, and others ; and which has always been a
moot-point and argued on both sides ; some taking it
for a diminution of felicity, for that to be happy both
in the individual self and in the propagation of the
kind would be a blessing above the condition of hu-
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 451
manity ; others regarding it as the crown and consum-
mation of felicity, because that happiness only can be
accounted perfect over which fortune has no further
power i which cannot be where there is posterity.
Nor were outward conditions wanting : a tall stat-
ure, a graceful shape, a countenance in the highest de-
gree majestic and yet sweet, a most happy and healthy
constitution ; to which this also must be added, that
retaining her health and vigour to the end, and having
experienced neither the vicissitudes of fortune nor the
ills of old age, she obtained at last by an easy and gen-
tle death that euthanasia which Augustus Caesar was
wont so earnestly to pray for ; and which is noted in
the case of that excellent Emperor Antoninus Pius,
whose death wore the appearance of a sweet and placid
sleep. So likewise in the last illness of Elizabeth there
was nothing miserable, nothing terrible, nothing re-
volting to human nature. She was not tormented
either with desire of life, or impatience of sickness, or
pangs of pain : none of the symptoms were frightful
or loathsome ; but all of that kind which showed
rather the frailty than the corruption and dishonour of
nature. For a few days before her death, by reason
of the exceeding dryness of her body, wasted as it was
with the cares of government and never refreshed with
wine or a more generous diet, she was struck with pa-
ralysis ; and yet she retained her powers of speech (a
thing not usual in that disease) and of mind and of
motion ; only somewhat slower and duller. And this
state of her body lasted only a few days, as if it were
less like the last act of life than the first step to death.
For to continue long alive with the faculties impaired
is a miserable thing ; but to have the sense a little laid
452 TRANSLATION OF THE
asleep and so pass quickly to death, is a placid and
merciful period and close of life.
To crown all, as she was most fortunate in all that
belonged to herself, so was she in the virtue of her
ministers. For she had such men about her as perhaps
till that day this island did not produce. But God
when he favours kings raises also and accomplishes the
spirits of their servants.
Her death was followed by two posthumous felicities,
more lofty and august perhaps than those which at-
tended her in life ; her successor, and her memory.
For successor she has got one who, though in respect
of masculine virtue and of issue and of fresh accession
of empire he overtop and overshadow her, nevertheless
both shows a tender respect for her name and honour,
and bestows upon her acts a kind of perpetuity ; hav-
ing made no change of any consequence either in
choice of persons or order of proceedings ; insomuch
that seldom has a son succeeded to a father with such
silence and so little change and perturbation. And as
for her memory, it is so strong and fresh both in the
mouths and minds of men that, now death has extin-
guished envy and lighted up fame, the felicity of her
memory contends in a manner with the felicity of her
life. For if any factious rumour (bred of party feel-
ing and religious dissension) still wanders abroad (and
yet even this seems now timid and weak and overborne
by general consent), sincere it is not, enduring it can-
not be. And on this account chiefly it is that I have
put together these observations, such as they are, con-
cerning her felicity and the marks she enjoyed of the
divine favour, that malevolent men may fear to curse
what God has so highly blessed.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 453
And if any man shall say in answer, as was said to
Caesar, " Here is much indeed to admire and wonder
at, but what is there to praise ? " surely I account true
wonder and admiration as a kind of excess of praise.
Nor can so happy a fortune as I have described fall to
the lot of any, but such as besides being singularly sus-
tained and nourished by the divine favour, are also in
some measure by their own virtue the makers of such
fortune for themselves. And yet I think good to add
some few remarks upon her moral character ; confining
myself however to those points which seem most to
give opening and supply fuel to the speeches of tra-
ducers.
In religion Elizabeth was pious and moderate, and
constant, and adverse to innovation. Of her piety,
though the proofs appear most clearly in her actions,
yet no slight traces were to be found likewise in her
ordinary way of life and conversation. Prayers and
divine service, either in her chapel or closet, she sel-
dom failed to attend. Of the Scriptures and the writ-
ings of the Fathers, especially those of St. Augustine,
she was a great reader. Some prayers upon particular
occasions she herself composed. If she chanced even
in common talk to speak of God, she almost always
both gave him the title of her Maker, and composed
her eyes and countenance to an expression of humility
and reverence ; a thing which I have myself often ob-
served. And as for that which some have given out,
that she could not endure the thought of mortality and
wras impatient of all allusion either to old age or death,
that is utterly untrue. For very often, many years
before her death, she would pleasantly call herself an
old woman, and would talk of the kind of epitaph she
454 TRANSLATION OF THE
would like to have upon her tomb ; saying that she
had no fancy for glory or splendid titles, but would
rather have a line or two of memorial, recording in few
words only her name, her virginity, the time of her
reign, the reformation of religion, and the preservation
of peace. It is true that in the flower of her years,
while she was yet able to bear children, being ques-
tioned about declaring a successor, she replied that she
would not have her winding sheet spread before her
eyes while she was alive ; and yet not many years be-
fore her death, being in a thoughtful mood, meditating
probably upon her mortality, and being interrupted by
one of her familiars with a complaint that many great
offices in the commonwealth were too long vacant, she
rose up and said in some displeasure, it was clear that
her office would not be vacant for an instant.
With regard to her moderation in religion there
may seem to be a difficulty, on account of the severity
of the laws made against popish subjects. But on this
point I have some things to advance which I myself
carefully observed and know to be true.
Her intention undoubtedly was, on the one hand not
to force consciences, but on the other not to let the
state, under pretence of conscience and religion, be
brought in danger. Upon this ground she concluded
at the first that, in a people courageous and warlike
and prompt to pass from strife of minds to strife of
hands, the free allowance and toleration by public au-
thority of two religions would be certain destruction.
Some of the more turbulent and factious bishops also
she did, in the newness of her reign when all things
were subject to suspicion, — but not without legal war-
rant — restrain and keep in free custody. The rest,
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 455
both clergy and laity, far from troubling them with
any severe inquisition, she sheltered by a gracious con-
nivency. This was the condition of affairs at first.
Nor even when provoked by the excommunication pro-
nounced against her by Pius Quintus (an act sufficient
not only to have roused indignation but to have fur-
nished ground and matter for a new course of proceed-
ing), did she depart almost at all from this clemency,
but persevered in the course which was agreeable to her
own nature. For being both wise and of a high spirit,
she was little moved with the sound of such terrors ;
knowing she could depend upon the loyalty and love of
her own people, and upon the small power the popish
party within the realm had to do harm, as long as they
were not seconded by a foreign enemy. About the
twenty-third year of her reign however, the case was
changed. And this distinction of time is not arti-
ficially devised to make things fit, but expressed and
engraved in public acts.
For up to that year there was no penalty of a griev-
ous kind imposed by previous laws upon popish sub-
jects. But just then the ambitious and vast design of
Spain for the subjugation of the kingdom came grad-
ually to light. Of this a principal part was the raising
up within the bowels of the realm of a disaffected and
revolutionary party which should join with the invad-
ing enemy ; and the hope of effecting this lay in our
religious dissensions. To this object therefore they
addressed themselves with all their might; and, the
seminaries beginning then to blossom, priests were sent
over into England for the purpose of kindling and
spreading a zeal for the Romish religion, of teaching
and inculcating the power of Romish excommunication
456
TRANSLATION OF THE
to release subjects from their obedience, and of excit-
ing and preparing men's minds with expectation of a
change. About the same time an attempt was made
upon Ireland with open arms, the name and govern-
ment of Elizabeth was assailed with a variety of wicked
libels, and there was a strange ferment and swelling in
the world, forerunner of some greater disturbance.
And though I do not say that all the priests were ac-
quainted with the design, or knew what was doing ; for
they may have been only the tools of other men's mal-
ice ; yet it is true, and proved by the confessions of
many witnesses, that from the year I have mentioned
to the thirtieth of Elizabeth (when the design of Spain
and the Pope was put in execution by that memorable
armada of land and sea forces) almost all the priests
who were sent over to tins country were charged
among the other offices belonging to their function, to
insinuate that matters could not long stay as they were,
that a new aspect and turn of things would be seen
shortly, and that the state of England was cared for
both by the Pope and the Catholic princes, if the Eng-
lish would but be true to themselves. Besides which,
some of the priests had plainly engaged themselves in
practices tending directly to the shaking and subversion
of the state ; and above all, letters were intercepted
from various quarters by which the plan upon which
they were to proceed was discovered ; in which letters
it was written, that the vigilance of the Queen and
her council in the matter of the Catholics would be
eluded ; for that she was only intent upon preventing
the Catholic party from getting a head in the person of
any nobleman or great personage, whereas the plan
now was to dispose and prepare everything by the
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 457
agency of private persons and men of small mark ; and
that too without their having any communication or
acquaintance one with another; but all to be done
under the seal of confession. Such were the arts then
resorted to — arts with which these men (as we have
seen lately in a case not much unlike) are practised
and familiar. This so great tempest of dangers made
it a kind of necessity for Elizabeth to put some severer
constraint upon that party of her subjects which was
estranged from her and by these means poisoned be-
yond recovery, and was at the same time growing rich
by reason of their immunity from public offices and
burdens. And as the mischief increased, the origin of
it being traced to the seminary priests, who were bred
in foreign parts, and supported by the purses and char-
ities of foreign princes, professed enemies of this king-
dom, and whose time had been passed in places where
the very name of Elizabeth was never heard except as
that of a heretic excommunicated and accursed, and
who (if not themselves stained with treason) were the
acknowledged intimates of those that were directly en-
gaged in such crimes, and had by their own arts and
poisons depraved and soured with a new leaven of ma-
lignity the whole lump of Catholics, which had before
been more sweet and harmless ; there was no remedy
for it but that men of this class should be prohibited
upon pain of death from coming into the kingdom at
all ; which at last, in the twenty-seventh year of her
reign, was done. Nor did the event itself which fol-
lowed not long after, when so great a tempest assailed
and fell with all its fury upon the kingdom, tend in
any degree to mitigate the envy and hatred of these
men ; but rather increased it, as if they had utterly
458 TRANSLATION OF THE
#
cast off all feeling for their country, which they were
ready to betray to a foreign servitude. And though it
is true that the fear of danger from Spain, which was
the spur that goaded her to this severity, did after-
wards subside or abate ; yet because the memory of
the time past remained deeply printed in men's minds
and feelings, and the laws once made could not be
abrogated without the appearance1 of inconstancy, or
neglected without the appearance of weakness and dis-
order, the very force of circumstances made it impos-
sible for Elizabeth to return to the former state of
things as it was before the twenty-seventh year of her
reign. To which must be added the industry of some
of her officers to improve the exchequer, and the solic-
itude of her ministers of justice who saw no hope of
salvation for the country but in the laws ; all which
demanded and pressed the execution of them. And
yet what her own natural disposition was appears
plainly in this, that she so blunted the law's edge that
but a small proportion of the priests were capitally
punished. All which I say not by way of apology ;
for these proceedings need no apology ; since the
safety of the kingdom turned upon them, and all this
severity both in the manner and the measure of it
came far short of the bloody examples set by the priest-
hood, — examples scarcely to be named among Chris-
tians, and proceeding moreover some of them rather
out of arrogance and malice than out of necessity.
But I conceive that I have made good my assertion,
and shown that in the cause of religion she was indeed
moderate, and that what variation there was was not
in her nature but in the times.
Of her constancy in religion and worship the best
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 459
proof is her dealing with Popery : which though in
her sister's reign it had been established by public au-
thority and fostered with great care and labour, and
had taken deep root in the land, and was strengthened
by the consent and zeal of all who were in authority
and power ; yet because it was not agreeable either to
the word of God or to primitive purity or to her own
conscience, she at once with the greatest courage and
the fewest helps proceeded to uproot and abolish.
And yet she did it not precipitately or upon eager im-
pulse, but prudently and all in due season ; as may be
gathered from many circumstances, and among the
rest from a reply made by her on the following occa-
sion. Not many days after she came to the throne,
when prisoners were released (as the custom is to in-
augurate and welcome a new reign by the release of
prisoners), a certain courtier, who from nature and
habit had taken to himself the license of a jester, came
to her as she went to chapel, and either of his own
motion or set on by wiser men, presented her a peti-
tion ; adding with a loud voice before all the company,
that there were yet four or five prisoners more who
deserved liberty, for whom he besought that they might
be released likewise ; namely, the four Evangelists and
the Apostle Paul ; who had been long shut up in an
unknown tongue, as it were in prison, so that they
could not converse with the people. To whom she
answered very wisely, that it were good first to inquire
further of themselves, whether they would be released
or no : thus meeting a sudden question with a doubtful
answer, as meaning to keep all clear and whole for her
own decision. And yet she did not introduce these
changes timidly neither, nor by starts ; but proceeding
460 TRANSLATION OF THE
in due order, gravely and maturely, after conference
had been first had between the parties, and a Parlia-
ment held, she then at last, and yet all within a single
year, so ordered and established everything relating to
the Church, that to the last day of her life she never
allowed a single point to be departed from. Nay, at
almost every meeting of Parliament she gave a public
warning against innovation in the discipline and rites
of the Church. And so much for the point of religion.
As for those lighter points of character, — as that
she allowed herself to be wooed and courted, and even
to have love made to her ; and liked it ; and continued
it beyond the natural age for such vanities ; — if any
of the sadder sort of persons be disposed to make a
great matter of this, it may be observed that there is
something to admire in these very things, which ever
way you take them. For if viewed indulgently, they
are much like the accounts we find in romances, of the
Queen in the blessed islands, and her court and institu-
tions, who allows of amorous admiration but prohibits
desire.1 But if you take them seriously, they chal-
lenge admiration of another kind and of a very high
order ; for certain it is that these dalliances detracted
but little from her fame and nothing at all from her
majesty, and neither weakened her power nor sensibly
hindered her business : — whereas such things are not
unfrequently allowed to interfere with the public for-
tune. But to conclude, she was no doubt a good and
moral Queen; and such too she wished to appear.
Vices she hated, and it was by honest arts that she
desired to shine. And speaking of her morality, I
remember a circumstance in point. Having ordered
1 1 have not been able to learn what romance Bacon alludes to here.
IN FELICEM MEMORIAM ELIZABETHS. 461
a letter to be written to her ambassador concerning
a message which was to be given separately to the
Queen Mother of the Valois, and finding that her
secretary had inserted a clause directing the ambas-
sador to say to the Queen Mother by way of com-
pliment, that they were two Queens from whom
though women no less was expected in administra-
tion of affairs and in the virtue and arts of govern-
ment than from the greatest men, — she would not
endure the comparison, but ordered it to be struck
out; saying that the arts and principles which she
employed in governing were of a far other sort than
those of the Queen Mother. Nor was she spoiled
by power and long reigning: but the praises which
pleased her most were when one so managed the con-
versation as aptly to insinuate that even if she had
passed her life in a private and mean fortune she
could not have lived without some note of excellency
among men ; so little was she disposed to borrow any-
thing of her fortune to the credit of her virtue. But
if I should enter into her praises, whether moral or
political, I should either fall into certain common-place
observations and commemorations of virtues, which
would be unworthy of so rare a princess ; or in order
to give them a lustre and beauty peculiar and appro-
priate, I should have to run into the history of her
life, — a task requiring both more leisure and a richer
vein. Thus much I have said in few words, accord-
ing to my ability. But the truth is that the only true
commender of this lady is time, which, so long a
course as it has run, has produced nothing in this
sex like her, for the administration of civil affairs.
END OF VOL. XI.
NOTE
The following list of errata, and also others which have been
corrected in their proper places, were furnished to the American
Publishers by Mr. Spedding, one of the Editors of the English
edition of Bacon's Works, of which this is a reprint : —
Page 52, line 3 from bottom, upon the words "obtained the
victory upon a Saturday," insert the following note : " So Speed,
translating Bernard Andre. The Battle of Bosworth, however,
was really fought on a Monday."
Page 53, line 9 from top, upon the words " close chariot," in-
sert the following note : " This statement comes from Speed, who
so interpreted Bernard Andre's expression Patenter ingressus
est.' It appears, however, that the true reading is loztanter. See
Memorials of Henry Vll. (London, 1858.) Editor's Preface,
p. xxvi."
Page 293, last line, for " on the 3rd of October, 1492, (see
Conquerors of the New World and their Bondsmen, vol. i. p.
100)," read, " on the 11th of October, 1492 (see Helps's Spanish
Conquest in America, vol. i. 109.)"
^
B 1153 1860 v.ll SMC
Bacon, Francis,
The works of Francis Bacon
47230780
Bacon, F
B
1153
*1RA1
Works
vol.
11
DATE
ISSUED TO
m:
I
tftffi
m
W