Skip to main content

Full text of "Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture"

See other formats


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2010  with  funding  from 

NCSU  Libraries 


http://www.archive.org/details/yearbookofuniteOOunit 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dep:         -  -    1906. 


Frontispiece. 


Henry  Cullen  Adams,  of  Wisconsin. 

Born   November  28,   1850.  Died  July  9.   1906. 

Mr.  Adams  represented  the  Second  I      gi  --    naJ  District  of  Wisconsin  in  trie  Fifty- 
eighth  and  Fifty-ninth         -     ses.    He  was  an  active  member  of  the  Committee 

on  Agriculture,  and  was  the  author  of  the  aet  for  the  increased  endowment  of  the 
iltural  experiment  stations,  generally  known  as  the  Adams  Act 


TEAEBOOK 


OF   THE 


UNITED  STATES 
DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE. 


1906. 


WASHINGTON: 

GOVERNMENT    PRINTING    OFFICE, 
1907. 


[Chapte:    .      -     -    at  L.,  1S95.] 
[AH  ACT  providing  for  the  public  j'rinting  and  binding  and  the  distribution  of  public  documents.] 


-       :on  73.  paragraph  2: 

The  Annual  Report  of  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture  shall  hereafter  be  submitted 
and  printed  in  two  parts,  as  follows:  Part  One.  which  shall  contain  purely  business 
and  executive  matter  which  it  is  necessary  for  thr  5c  -ubmit  to  the  Presi- 

dent and  Congress:  Part  Two.  which  shall  contain  such  reports  from  the  different 

us  and  Divisions,  and  such  papers  prepared  by  their  special  agents,  accompa- 
nied by  suitable  ill  v.-  -  Shall,  in  the  opinion  of  the  Secretary,  be  specially 
suited  to  interest  and  instruct  the  farmers  of  the  country,  and  to  include  a  general 
report  of  the  operations  of  the  Department  for  their  information.  There  shall  be 
printed  of  Part  One.  one  thousand  copies  for  the  Senate,  two  thousand  copies  for  the 
House,  and  three  thousand  copies  for  the  Department  of  Agriculture:  and  of  Part 

one  hundred  and  ten  thousand  copies  for  the  use  of  the  Senate,  three  hundred 
and  sixty  thousand  copies  for  the  use  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  and  thirty 

-and  copies  for  the  use  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture,  the  illustratio:.- 
the  same  to  be  executed  under  the  supervision  of  the  Public  Printer,  in  accordance 
with  directions  of  the  Joint  Committee  on  Printing,  said  illustrations  to  be  subject 
to  the  approval  of  U  .riculture:  and  the  title  of  each  of  the  said 

-  hall  be  such  as  to  show  that  such  part  is  complete  in  itself. 


PREFACE. 


The  Yearbook  for  1906  closely  follows  in  the  main  the  style  and 
character  of  its  predecessors.  The  Annual  Report  of-  the  Secretary  of 
Agriculture  is  reproduced  in  compliance  with  the  act  of  Congress, 
which  requires  that  the  Yearbook  shall  "  include  a  general  report  of 
the  operations  of  the  Department." 

The  special  papers  contributed  by  the  several  Bureaus  and  Offices 
of  the  Department  number  twenty-rive  and  occupy  332  pages.  These 
papers  are  all  contributed  by  employees  of  the  Department,  and  the 
subject-matter  of  each  is  closely  related  to  some  line  of  departmental 
work. 

An  earnest  effort  has  been  made  not  only  to  maintain  but  to  extend 
the  scope  and  value  of  the  Appendix  so  far  as  this  could  be  done  with- 
out too  greatly  enlarging  its  dimensions.  It  may  be  stated  here,  as 
an  answer  to  many  inquiries,  that  it  has  been  found  impossible  to 
admit  any  but  national  associations  in  what  may  be  termed  the  agri- 
cultural directory,  which  forms  an  important  part  of  the  Appendix. 

More  than  usual  attention  has  been  given  to  the  presentation  of 
agricultural  statistics,  as  these  constitute  one  of  the  most  important 
features  of  the  Yearbook.  There  appear  in  this  volume  all  the  usual 
Yearbook  tables  showing  acreage,  production,  prices,  values,  etc.,  of 
the  principal  farm  crops  of  the  United  States,  production  of  the  same 
crops  in  nearly  all  foreign  countries,  international  trade  in  many  lead- 
ing products,  and  statistics  of  all  the  principal  animal  industries.  The 
exports  and  imports  of  agricultural  products  are  presented  with  the 
usual  fullness.  One  very  valuable  feature  of  these  statistics  is  the 
presentation  of  data  for  previous  years  (usually  four  or  more)  so  that 
comparison  may  reveal  the  increase  or  decrease  of  production  or  trade. 

The  statistical  portion  has  also  been  considerably  enlarged  by  includ- 
ing a  number  of  new  tables.  The  most  important  of  these  are  tables 
giving  statistics  of  the  cotton  crop  of  the  United  States  for  one  hun- 
dred and  seventeen  years  (1790-1906);  production  of  sugar  in  the 
United  States  and  its  possessions  for  fifty-three  years  (1854-1906);  and 
farm  and  factory  results  in  the  beet-sugar  industry  for  six  years 
(1901-1906).  The  statistics  of  international  trade  have  been  amplified 
by  the  inclusion  of  tables  showing  the  international  trade  in  corn, 

3 


4  PREFACE. 

.t  and  wheat  flour,  hops,  tea.  coffee,  oil  cake  and  oil-cake  meal, 
resin,  spirits  of  turpentine,  india  rubber,  wood  pulp,  hides  and  skins, 
butter,  and  cheese.  Many  of  the  facts  embraced  in  these  new  tables 
are,  it  is  believed,  brought  together  and  presented  in  this  form  for 
the  first  time  in  any  publication. 

The  Appendix  includes  a  review  of  weather  conditions  during  the 
crop  season  of  1906;  a  review  of  the  live-.-tock  industry  during  the 
year,  involving  a  statement  of  the  greatly  increased  scope  of  the  Gov- 
ernment meat  inspection:  reports  on  plant  d>  aes,  and  the  principal 
injurious  insects  in  1906:  the  areas  surveyed  and  mapped  by  the 
Bureau  of  Soils:  an  account  of  what  is  being  done  under  the  new 
"pure  food  law:v  a  report  on  the  progress  of  forestry,  and  a  report 
on  game  protection  for  the  year. 

The  portrait  of  Hon.  Henry  Cullen  Adams,  Representative  in  the 
Fifty-ninth  Congress  for  the  Second  district  of  Wisconsin,  has  been 
selected  for  the  frontispiece.  In  view  of  the  conspicuous  services 
rendered  to  agriculture  by  Mr.  Adams  during  his  public  career, 
recently  cut  short  by  death,  this  selection  will  be  appreciated  by  the 
friends  of  agriculture  throughout  the  country. 

The  tendency  in  pa.-t  years  has  been  to  increase  the  size  of  the 
Yearbook.  This  tendency  ha.^  been  rigorously  controlled  in  the  pres- 
ent volume,  with  the  result  that  it  contains  nearly  100  pages  less  than 
the  Yearbook  for  1905.  and  only  13  plate-,  as  against  73  in  the  previous 
volume.  The  result  has  been  to  produce  a  volume  more  convenient 
in  size  than  several  of  its  recent  predecessors. 

Geo.  Wm.  Hlll, 
Department  Editor. 

Washington.  D.  C,  May  29,  1907. 


C  O  X  T  E  X  T  S  . 


Page. 

Eeport  of  the  Secretary 9 

New  Problems  of  the  Weather.      Bv  "Willis  L.   Moore.   W.  J.  Humphreys, 

and  0.  L.  Fassig 121 

The  Present  Status  of  the  Nitrogen  Problem.     By  A.  F.  Woods 125 

Object-lesson  Roads.     By  Logan  Waller  Page 137 

Introduction  of  Elementary  Agriculture  into  Schools.     By  A.  C.  True 151 

Cage-bird  Traffic  of  the  United  States.     By  Henry  Oldys 165 

The  Use  of  Soil  Surveys.     By  J.  A.  Bonsteel 1S1 

Birds  that  Eat  Scale  Insects.     By  W.  L.  McAtee 189 

The  Effect  of  Climatic  Conditions  on  the  Composition  of  Durum  Wheat.     By 

J.  A.  LeClerc 199 

The  Game  Warden  of  To-day.     By  R.  W.  Williams,  jr 213 

Range  Management.     By  J.  S.  Cotton 225 

The  Preparation  of  Unfermented  Apple  Juice.     By  H.  C.  Gore 239 

Foreign  Restrictions  on  American  Meat.     By  Frank  R.  Rutter 247 

Methods  of  Reducing  the  Cost  of  Producing  Beet  Sugar.     By  C.  0.  Townsend.  265 

Corn-breeding  Work  at  the  Experiment  Stations.     By  J.  I.  Schulte 279 

Nuts  and  their  Uses  as  Food.     By  M.  E.  Jaffa 295 

Some  Recent  Studies  of  the  Mexican  Cotton  Boll  Weevil.     By  W.  D.  Hunter.  313 

Cloud-bursts,  So-called.     By  Edward  L.  Wells 325 

New  Citrus  and  Pineapple  Productions  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture.    By 

Herbert  J.  Webber 329 

Distribution  of  Tuberculin  and  Mallein  by  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry. 

By  M.  Dorset 347 

Promising  New  Fruits.     By  William  A.  Taylor 355 

Freight  Costs  and  Market  Values.     By  Frank  Andrews 371 

New  Tobacco  Varieties.     By  A.  D.  Shamel 

Opportunities  for  Dairying: 

I.  General.     By  Wm.  Hart  Dexter 405 

II.  New  England.     By  George  M.  Whitaker 40S 

III.  The  North  Central  States.     By  B.  D.  White 412 

IV.  The  South.  By  B.  H.  Bawl... 417 

V.  The  Pacific  Coast.     By  E.  A.  McDonald 422 

Lime-sulphur  Washes  for  the  San  Jose  Scale.     By  A.  L.  Quaintance 429 

National  Forests  and  the  Lumber  Supply.     By  Thomas  H.  Sherrard 447 

Appendix: 

Organization  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture 453 

Appropriations  for  the  Department  of  Agriculture  for  the  fiscal  years  end- 
ing June  30,  1905,  1906,  and  1907 458 

Agricultural  colleges  and  other  institutions  in  the  United  States  having 

courses  in  agriculture 45S 

5 


6  CONTENTS. 

Appendix — Continued.  Page- 
Agricultural  experiment  stations  of  the  United  .States,  their  locations, 

directors,  and  principal  lines  or  work 461 

iation  of  American  Agricultural  Colleges  and  Experiment  Stations. .  464 

Officials  in  charge  of  farmers'  institutes 464- 

American  Association  of  Farmers'  Institute  Workers 464 

State  officials  in  charge  of  agriculture 465 

National  dairy  associations 465 

American  National  Live  Stock  Association 466 

American  Association  of  Live  Stock  Herd  Book  Secretaries 466 

National  Wool  Growers'  Association 466 

The  Corn-belt  Meat  Producers'  Association 466 

Protection  against  contagion  from  foreign  cattle 466 

Stock  breeders'  associations 466 

Sanitary  officers  in  charge  of  live  stock  interests 468 

.-sociations 469 

Schools  of  forestry 469 

National  Bee  Keepers'  Association 470 

National  Association  of  Economic  Entomologists 470 

-  -    .iation  of  Official  Agricultural  Chemists 470 

National  horticultural  and  kindred  societies 470 

State  highway  officials 471 

State  officials  in  charge  of  protection  of  game 471 

Organizations  for  protection  of  birds  and  game 472 

American  Bre-        -       -  a  :>ciation 472 

Farmers'  National  Congress 472 

Patrons  of  Husbandry 472 

Review  of  weather  conditions  during  the  crop  season  of  1906 473 

The  live-stock  industry  in  1906 492 

Plant  diseases  in  1906 499 

The  principal  injurious  insects  of  1906 508 

Areas  surveyed  and  mapped  by  the  Bureau  of  Soils 517 

Progress  in  food  and  drug  inspection  and  correlated  investigations 

Review  of  road  laws  enacted  in  1906 521 

o  farm  management  in  1906 524 

:  forestry  in  1906 525 

Game  protection  in  1906 533 

Farmers'  institutes 541 

Statistics  of  the  principal  crops 542 

Farm  animals  and  their  products 632 

International  trade  in  animal  products 637 

Farm  animals  and  their  products  in  continental  Cnited  States 648 

Transportation  rates - 665 

Imports  and  exports  of  agricultural  products 670 

Legal  weights  per  bushel 690 

Index 695 


ILLUSTRATIONS. 


PLATES. 

Page. 

Henry  Cullen  Adams,  of  Wisconsin Frontispiece 

Plate       I.  Buildings  and  apparatus  at  Mount  Weather,  Va 122 

II.  Appliances  in  use  at  Mount  Weather,  Va 122 

III.  Buildings  and  instruments  at  Mount  Weather,  Va 122 

IV.  Fig.   1.  First  object-lesson  roads   built    by  the  Office  of   Public 

Roads.  Atlanta,  Ga.,  1895.     Fig.  2.  Tarring  road   at    Jackson, 

Tenn. — Latest  advance  in  road  surfacing 142 

V.  The  evolution  of  a  country-road,  Uniontown,  Ala 142 

VI.  Macadam  road  at  Auburn,  Nebr.,  built  through  river  bottom 148 

VII.  Fig.  1.  Crushing  plant,  Walla  Walla,  Wash.     Fig.  2.  Preparing  set 
grade  for  macadam  road  with  traction  engine  and  road  machine, 

Arkansas  City,  Kans.     Fig.  3.  Concrete  bridge,  Texarkana,  Ark  .  148 

VIII.  Methods  of  shipping  and  testing  cage  birds 170 

IX.  Lady  Gould  finch 178 

X.  Photomicrographs  of  cross  sections  of  wheat  grown  under  varying 

conditions 210 

XL  Whole  wheat  showing  (1)  flinty,  (2)  half  starchy,  and  (3)  starchy 

grains 210 

XII.  Fig.  1.  A  stallion  used    in   improving  a  herd  of  range  horses  in 
North  Dakota.     Fig.  2.  Range  horses,  the  progeny  of  stallions  like 

that  shown  in  figure  1 236 

XIII.  Fig.  1.  Polish  women  thinning  beets.     Fig.  2.  Belgian  method  of 

topping  beets 274 

XIV.  Fig.  1.  Power  hoe  that  may  be  utilized  in  blocking  and  hoeing 

sugar  beets.     Fig.  2.  Siloing  sugar  beets  for  the  factory 274 

XV.  Fig.  1.  California  Indians  pounding  acorn  meal  for  food.     Fig.  2. 

California  Indian  leaching  acorns  for  food 306 

XVI.  Early  versus  late  planting  in  the  control  of  the  boll  weevil 322 

XVII.  Colman  citrange 332 

XVIII.  Savage  citrange 332 

XIX.  Rustic  citrange 332 

XX.  Fig.  1.  Branch    of   the    Savage    citrange.     Fig.  2.  Branch    of  the 

Colman  citrange 332 

XXI.  Thornton  orange 338 

XXII.  Fig.  1.  Deliciosa  pineapple.     Fig.  2.  Dade  pineapple 338 

XXIII.  Fig.  1.  Coquina  pineapple.     Fig.  2.  Jupiter  pineapple 342 

XXIV.  Fig.  1.  Jensen  pineapple.     Fig.  2.  Orlando  pineapple.     Fig.  3.  Bis- 

cayne  pineapple 342 

XXV.  Magnate  apple 356 

XXVI.  Oliver  Red  apple 358 

XXVII.  Rabun  apple 358 

XXVIII.  Early  Wheeler  peach 360 

7 


ILLUSTRATION-. 

Page. 

XXIX.  Banner  grape 360 

XXX.  J  ..sephine  persimmon 364 

XXXI.  Chappelow  avocado 364 

XXXII.  Pecan  varieties 368 

XXXIII.  Uncle  Sam  Sumatra  tobacco 

XXXIV.  Hazlewood  Cuban  tobacco 

XXXV.  Brewer  Hybrid  tobacco 396 

XXXVI.  C  -ley  Hybrid  tobacco 396 

XXXVII.  Plants  for  cooking  lime-sulpbur  wash.     Fig.  1.  A  single-kettle  fur- 
nace.    Fig.  -.  A  w ell-arranged  plant  for  cooking  the  wash  on  a 

large  scale 443 

XXXVIII.  Plants  for  cooking  lime-sulphur  wash:    1>  A  western  Xew  York 
outfit.  (2)  an  inconvenient  cooking  plant,  and  (3)  an  outfit  with 

two  large  tanks  for  cooking,  with  boiler  between 

XXXIX.  Outfits  used  for  spraying  lime-sulphur  wash 444 

XL.  Departures  from  normal  temperature  for  the  crop  season  of  1906, 

from  March  1  to  September  30 

XLI.  Total  precipitation  for  the  crop  season  of  1906,  from  March  I 

tember  30 

XLII.  Departures  from  normal  precipitation  for  the  crop  season  of  1906, 

from  March  1  to  September  30 

XLIII.  Successful  example  of  planting  denuded  State  land 530 

TEXT  FIG" 

Fig.   1.  Black  olive  scale 193 

lie 195 

3.  Oyster-shell  bark-louse 196 

4.  Pasteurizer  for  apple  juice _4  5 

5.  Value  of  pork.  lard,  cattle,  and  beef  exported.  1S66-1906 248 

6.  Laborers'  houses — one  method  of  solving  the  labor  question  in  growing 

273 

7.  A  portable  house  used  in  some  parts  of  the  sugar-beet  area .'-. 

S.  Percentage  composition  of  an  oily  nut  and  a  starchy  nut 300 

9.  Map  of  cotton  belt  in  the  United  States,  showing  area  infested  by  boll 

weevil  in  1906  and  difference  in  amount  of  annual  normal  precipita- 
tion in  different  portions  of  infested  and  uninf ested  territory 314 

10.  Section  of  skin       S        a    ^nd  Col  man  citranges 331 

11.  Typical  leaf  of  Uncle  Sam  Sumatra  tobacco 390 

-    Typical  leaf  of  Hazlewood  Cuban  tobacco 392 

13.  Typical  leaf  of  Brewer  Hybrid  tobacco 394 

Typical  leaf  of  Cooley  Hybrid  tobacco 396 

15.  Two  plans  for  conducting  steam  into  barrels 

16.  Top  view  of  plant  for  cooking  lime-sulphur  wash 442 

17.  Temperature  and  precipitation  departures  for  season  of  1906  from  nor- 

mal of  many  years  for  Missouri  Valley  and  Pacific  coast 

Temperature  and  precipitation  departures  for  season  of  1906  from  nor- 
mal of  many  years  for  Middle.  South  Atlantic,  and  Gulf  States 475 

19.  Temperature  and  precipitation  departures  for  season  of  1906  from  nor- 
mal of  many  years  for  Lake  region,  upper  Mississippi  Valley.  Ohio 
Valley,  and  Tennessee 476 

20.  Areas  covered  by  the  Soil  Survey 517 

21.  Rise  in  prices  per  thousand  feet  of  different  kinds  of  lumber,  1S94-1906.       527 

22.  Map  <A  S:ate  forest  reservations 530 


YEARBOOK 

OF  THE 

U.  S.  DEPARTMENT   OF   AGRICULTURE. 


REPORT  OF  THE  SECRETARY. 

Mr.  President: 

In  presenting-  my  Tenth  Annual  Report  of  the  work  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture,  the  position  of  the  producer  from  the  soil  in  the 
development  of  our  country  is  indicated. 

It  will  be  seen  that  he  is  making  progress  in  the  sciences  and  arts 
of  agriculture;  that  the  researches  of  the  Department  and  of  the 
experiment  stations  are  enabling  him  to  meet  the  requirements  of  a 
growing  population  for  larger  quantities  of  held  products;  that  the 
time  of  the  man  and  the  yield  of  the  acre  become  more  responsive  as 
more  imperative  demands  are  made  upon  them;  that  our  research 
extends  to  all  the  States  and  Territories  and  to  our  island  possessions; 
that  every  feature  of  interest  in  soils,  plants,  and  animals  has  due 
attention;  that  explorations  during  the  past  year  in  extreme  northern 
latitudes  of  Europe  and  Asia  have  resulted  in  accessions  of  plants 
suitable  to  our  dry  regions  that  promise  to  help  in  bringing  them  into 
profitable  production.  • 

The  laws  made  by  Congress  at  its  last  session  to  be  put  into  execution 
by  the  Department  have  required  and  have  received  special  attention. 
The  meat  law  is  being  enforced  with  but  little  friction.  At  this  time 
inspection  is  made  in  about  1,000  houses,  and  about  1,300  experts  have 
been  added  to  the  inspection  force  of  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry. 

Rules  have  been  made,  as  required  by  Congress,  for  the  execution  of 
the  pure-food  law,  and  hearings  are  being  given  to  parties  interested. 
The  law  regarding  the  extermination  of  the  cattle  fever  tick  {Boophi- 
lus  an  mil  at  us)  of  the  Southern  States  is  being  put  in  force  and  good 
results  are  following.  Progress  is  being  made  in  dealing  with  the 
gipsy  and  brown-tail  moths  in  New  Englaud,  imported  parasites  being 
successfully  established.  A  beginning  has  been  made  in  determining 
correct  rules  for  grading  grain  and  acquiring  facts  regarding  methods 
of  handling  it  in  its  movement  toward  the  market. 

9 


10  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

The  law  providing  for  the  humane  treatment  of  live  stock  in  tran-it 
is  receiving  careful  consideration,  and  violations  will  be  reported  to 
the  Department  of  Justice. 

REVIEW    OF   PRODUCTION. 

NATIONAL   DEPENDENCE    ON    AGRICULTURE. 

Economic  revolution  in  the  art  and  science  of  agriculture,  which 
became  noticeable  in  this  country  half  a  dozen  years  ago,  has  continued 
during  1906,  with  tremendous  effect  upon  the  nation's  prosperity. 

Crops  so  large  as  to  be  beyond  any  rational  comprehension  have 
strained  the  freight-carrying  ability  of  railroads.  Directly  and 
indirectly  the  farmer  has  set  up  a  demand  for  iron  and  steel  that  has 
exceeded  the  productive  power  of  the  chief  producer  among  nations. 
His  contribution  to  the  supply  of  loan  capital  has  been  beyond  calcu- 
lation and  recalls  the  fact  that  the  depression  in  the  loan  and  invest- 
ment market  of  1903  was  cleared  away  by  the  following  crop. 

Meanwhile  the  farmer  has  been  a  generous  consumer,  and  has  given 
powerful  support  to  the  market  of  the  industrial  producer,  to  the 
trade  of  the  merchant,  and  to  the  wages  of  the  workingman. 

The  farmer  has  become  aware  of  the  importance  of  the  place  that 
he  occupies  in  the  Republic,  and  in  the  pride  of  his  occupation  he  is 
ready  to  offer  this  yearly  account  of  himself  to  the  people. 

Preliminary  crop  estimates,  subject  to  modification,  must  be  used  in 
the  following  review  of  the  year's  farm  production,  in  advance  of  the 
final  estimates  of  the  Department,  to  be  made  a  little  later.  The  esti- 
mate of  total  agricultural  wealth  production  has  been  continued  from 
previous  years  and  is  again  presented  as  an  indication  of  the  financial 
results  of  the  year's  operations.  All  attempts  in  the  past,  by  subtract- 
ing from  this  grand  total  of  value  such  products  as  are  used  wholly  or 
in  part  in  the  making  of  other  farm  products  in  order  that  the  farmer's 
net  wealth  production  might  be  ascertained,  have  given  no  indication 
of  what  that  net  production  was  and  have  only  obscured  the  matter. 

TOTAL   WEALTH    PRODUCED. 

Taken  at  that  point  in  production  at  which  they  acquire  commercial 
value,  the  farm  products  of  the  year,  estimated  for  every  detail  pre- 
sented by  the  census,  have  a  farm  value  of  I-6.794.O00.000.  This  is 
.000,000  above  the  value  of  1905,  $635,000,000  above  1904, 
£877,000,000  above  1903,  and  $2,077,000,000  above  the  census  for 
1899. 

The  value  of  the  farm  products  of  1906  was  8  per  cent  greater  than 
that  of  1905,  10  per  cent  over  1904,  15  per  cent  over  1903,  and  44  per 
cent  over  1899. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  11 

A  simple  series  of  index  numbers  is  readily  constructed,  which  shows 
the  progressive  movement  of  wealth  production  by  the  farmer.  The 
value  of  the  products  of  1899  being  taken  at  100,  the  value  for  1903 
stands  at  125,  for  1901  at  131,  for  1905  at  134,  and  for  1906  at  111. 

GAINS   AND    LOSSES. 

Analysis  into  items  of  the  grand  total  of  wealth  produced  discovers 
that  most  of  the  increase  over  1905  is  due  to  horses  and  meat  animals, 
and  this  is  so  partly  because  of  the  Department's  much  increased  esti- 
mate of  the  number  of  these  animals  last  January,  and  more  largely 
because  of  higher  prices  than  a  year  ago. 

The  price  of  milk  ran  higher  than  in  1905,  but  the  value  thus  gained 
in  wealth  produced  was  perhaps  more  than  offset  by  the  lower  prices 
for  butter.  So,  in  the  case  of  poultry,  the  gain  in  live  and  dressed 
poultry  was  more  than  balanced  by  the  reduced  egg  value,  since  the 
mean  farm  price  of  eggs,  as  ascertained  by  this  Department,  declined 
from  18.  7  cents  during  1905  to  17  cents  during  1906. 

Crops,  in  a  general  balance  of  gain  against  loss  in  value,  in  com- 
parison with  the  crops  of  1905,  have  made  substantial  but  not  large 
gain — about  $22,000,000;  so  that  the  previous  foremost  year  in  value 
of  products,  1905,  is  exceeded  by  1906  in  both  crops  and  animal  prod- 
ucts, and  thus  this  year  became  the  leading  one  in  value  of  farm 
products  in  the  history  of  the  country  by  $485,000,000  over  1905. 

On  the  side  of  gains  over  1905,  two  short  crops  are  conspicuous; 
hay  leads  with  a  gain  of  perhaps  $80,000,000  in  value,  and  the  oat 
crop  is  second,  with  a  gain  of  possibly  $14,000,000.  Barley  and  cotton- 
seed each  promise  a  gain  of  $10,000,000;  beet  sugar,  $7,000,000; 
tobacco,  $2,000,000  or  more;  and  hops,  $1,000,000. 

Against  these  gains  are  the  losses  of  three  abundant  crops — 
$60,000,000,  more  or  less,  for  wheat,  and  $10,000,000  each  for  corn 
and  potatoes.  The  loss  on  rye  and  cane  sugar  may  be  about  half  a 
million  dollars  each,  if  anything.  The  net  decline  for  all  cereals  may 
be  $40,000,000. 

The  foregoing  gains  and  losses  in  value,  as  well  as  others  not  men- 
tioned, are  exceedingly  uncertain,  and  are  to  be  regarded  only  as 
indicative  of  a  general  conclusion. 

CHIEF   CROPS. 

All  cereals. — While  the  value  of  all  cereals  dropped  about 
$40,000,000  below  the  total  of  1905,  and  about  $12,000,000  below  the 
total  of  1904,  the  number  of  bushels  for  1906,  which  was  4,688,000,000, 
was  120,000,000  bushels  above  the  yield  of  1905,  570,000,000  above  the 
yield  of  1904,  and  835,000,000  bushels  above  the  yield  of  1903. 


12  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Corn  remains  by  far  the  most  valuable  crop,  and  the  figure  that  it 
may  reach  this  year  is  $1,100,000,000  for  2,881,000,000  bushels— per- 
haps a  little  under  the  value  of  the  next  largest  crop,  that  of  1905. 

The  cotton  crop,  fiber  and  seed  combined,  follows  corn  in  order  of 
value,  although  it  is  only  three-fifths  of  the  value  of  the  corn  crop.  No 
comments  here  must  be  regarded  as  indicating  what  the  Department's 
estimate  of  the  cotton-fiber  production  is  to  be.  Upon  the  basis  of  the 
general  commercial  expectation  of  a  crop,  it  should  be  worth  to  the 
grower  nearly  $61:0,000,000.  In  Texas  alone  the  cotton  crop  is  greater 
than  that  of  British  India  and  nearly  three  times  that  of  Egypt,  and  it 
is  half  as  much  again  as  the  crop  of  the  world,  outside  of  the  United 
States,  India,  and  Egypt. 

Hat  is  a  crop  that  receives  small  popular  attention,  and  yet  it  is  the 
third  one  in  value  if  cotton  seed  is  included  in  the  cotton  crop,  and 
this  year  it  approaches  $600,000,000  for  a  product  that  is  short  by  per- 
haps 8,000,000  tons. 

Wheat. — The  fourth  crop  in  order  of  value  is  wheat,  which  this 
year  may  be  worth  over  $150,000,000,  a  value  that  has  been  exceeded 
in  several  years;  but  in  quantity  this  year's  crop,  with  its  710,000,000 
bushels,  is  only  8,000,000  bushels  below  the  largest  crop  grown — that 
of  1901. 

Oats. — The  crop  of  oats,  on  account  of  unfavorable  weather,  has 
fallen  below  the  usual  amount,  but  its  value  will  be  perhaps  not  far 
under  $300,000,000,  or  about  the  same  as  for  1905,  and  not  much 
under  the  highest  value  reached,  in  1902. 

Potatoes.— With  a  probable  crop  of  fully  300,000,000  bushels 
potatoes  reach  next  to  their  highest  production,  which  was  in  1904; 
but  the  total  value,  $150,000,000,  rests  upon  a  rather  low  average  per 
bushel  and  has  been  exceeded  in  other  years. 

Barley. —Seventh  among  the  crops  in  order  of  value  is  barley,  a 
cereal  that  has  gained  21  per  cent  in  production  in  seven  years.  The 
145,000,000  bushels  grown  this  year  may  be  worth  $65,000,000,  both 
bushels  and  dollars  being  much  more  than  for  the  highest  preceding 
jTears — 1904  being  the  previous  record  year  for  yield  and  1902  for  value. 

Tobacco,  which  has  shown  weakness  for-  several  years  on  account  of 
low  prices,  while  not  }~et  recovering  its  former  place  in  pounds 
grown,  has  a  crop  this  year  of  629,000,000  pounds,  with  a  value  which 
is  in  close  company  with  the  three  years  of  highest  value,  and  it  is 
expected  will  be  worth  $55,000,000,  or  perhaps  $2,000,000  more. 

Sugar. — A  remarkable  development  has  been  made  within  a  few 
years  by  now  the  ninth  crop — beet  sugar.  The  production  in  1906  is 
placed  at  345,000  long  tons,  with  a  value  supposed  to  be  near  $34,000,000. 
Seven  years  ago  only  72,972  tons  were  produced,  and  their  value  was 
about  $7,000,000. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  13 

The  year  was  a  rather  bad  one  for  eane  sugar,  but  in  spite  of  this 
the  total  production  of  beet  and  cane  sugar  slightly  exceeded  the  highest 
previous  figure,  although  in  value  of  sugar  the  year  stands  second. 
The  value  of  all  kinds  of  sugar,  sirup,  and  molasses  reaches  a  total  of 
$75,000,000,  second  only  to  1904,  which  was  cane  sugars  best  year. 

Flaxseed. — The  27,000,000  bushels  of  flaxseed  have  been  exceeded 
by  three  years,  although  the  value,  §25,000,000,  reaches  the  highest 
point. 

Rice,  standing  twelfth  in  order,  is  another  crop  with  its  highest 
value,  perhaps  §18,000,000,  although  in  production  the  770,000,000 
pounds  of  rough  rice  are  second  to  1904.  Markets  that  have  developed 
in  Hawaii  and  Porto  Rico  have  helped  to  keep  the  price  high  enough 
to  account  for  the  total  value  placed  upon  the  crop. 

Rye  has  become  a  minor  crop  and  has  now  fallen  below  rice  in 
value.  The  crop  of  this  year  is  below  the  larger  crops  of  recent 
years,  and  is  about  28,000,000  bushels,  worth  perhaps  §17,000,000. 

Hops. — The  fourteenth  crop  is  hops,  which  reached  its  largest 
dimensions  this  year  Avith  56,000,000  pounds,  and  as  high  a  value  as  it 
ever  had,  except  in  1901,  say.  §7,000,000. 

Summary. — On  the  whole,  crop  values  have  been  neither  notably 
high  nor  low  in  comparison  with  recent  years,  but  the  crops  are  so 
many  in  number  that  losses  meet  gains,  and  the  crops  have  been  on 
such  a  high  price  level  in  the  general  average  that  they  have  raised 
the  total  crop  value  somewhat  above  1905  and  the  high  preceding 
years.  To  reach  a  still  higher  point  in  this  extraordinary  series  of 
high  annual  values  than  had  been  touched  before  is  an  achievement  that 
deserves  attention. 

EXPORTS  OF  FARM  PRODUCTS  EXCEED  FORMER  YEARS. 

Farm  products  continue  to  be  so  far  beyond  the  national  require- 
ments that  the  farm  still  overshadows  the  mill,  the  factory,  and  the 
workshop  in  providing  exports.  With  his  surplus  beyond  the  nation's 
need,  the  farmer  has  loaded  the  fleets  of  oceans.  These  products  were 
exported  to  the  value  of  §976,000,000  during  the  fiscal  year  ending 
June  30,  1906 — enough  to  build  a  high-class  railroad  halfway  around 
the  earth.  This  is  the  largest  amount  ever  reached  by  agricultural 
exports  for  this  or  any  other  country,  and  exceeded  by  §21,000,000  the 
extraordinary  value  of  1901,  which  had  previously  been  the  record 
year. 

PEIXCIPAL    ITEMS. 

Principal  among  the  items  that  make  the  increase  over  the  fiscal 
year  1905  are  grain  and  its  products,  chiefly  wheat  and  flour,  for 
which  the  gain  was  $79,000,000;  packing-house  products,  for  which 


14  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

the  gain  was  over  $37,000,000;  cotton,  $19,600,000:  various  seeds, 
$6,355,000;  dairy  products,  $3,900,000;  and  live  animals,  (2,400,000. 

Products  exhibiting  a  decrease  were  mostly  inconsiderable.  In  hops, 
the  decline  was  £1,355,000:  tobacco,  $992,000;  vegetable  oils.  £7:26.000; 
fruits.  $440,000. 

HIGHEST    VALUE    OF    COTTON"    EXPORTS. 

Cotton  maintains  its  long  lead  over  other  chief  exports,  with  a 
value  of  1401,000,000  for  3,631.000.000  pounds,  so  that  the  latest  year 
was  exceeded  only  by  1898,  1899,  and  1905  in  quantity  exported;  but 
in  value  of  exported  cotton  the  figures  for  1906  are  $19,600,000  higher 
than  for  1905,  which  was  previously  the  record  year,  and  $29.000.0<>J 
higher  than  for  1901.  which  was  third  in  order  in  the  value  of  these 
exports. 

In  exports  of  grain  and  grain  products  for  1906  the  value  again 
reached  a  high  amount  and  has  been  exceeded  only  13  times  in  the 
last  fifty-six  years.  The  value  of  this  class  of  exports  last  year  was 
almost  exactly  the  average  of  the  preceding  twenty-five  years. 

LEADING    YEAR    FOR    PACKING-HOUSE    PRODUCTS. 

Packing-house  products  are  another  class  of  exports  that  found  their 
leading  year  in  value  in  1906,  the  amount  being  $907,700,000.  No  pre- 
vious year  had  reached  S200.000.000.  and  only  two  years  had  passed 
$1SO,000,000.  The  value  of  exported  fresh  beef.  £21.300.000.  was 
well  up  to  the  average  of  recent  years;  lard  exports  to  the  value  of 
$60,000,000  and  a  quantity  of  712.000,000  pounds  went  far  beyond  the 
highest  figure  of  preceding  years  in  both  respects;  bacon  took  an 
upward  turn  with  exports  valued  at  $36,000,000  for  361. 000. 000  pounds 
and  rose  well  up  toward  the  higher  export  years  of  the  past.  The  level 
of  recent  years  was  reached  in  the  exports  of  hams,  their  value  being 
120,000,000  and  weight  191,000,000  pounds.  The  highest  exports, 
both  in  quantity  and  value,  of  oleo  oil  in  previous  years  were  far  over- 
topped by  the  exports  of  this  commodity  in  1906,  and  the  210,000. oOO 
pounds  exported  were  valued  at  $17,500,000. 

IMPORTS    OF    FARM    PRODUCTS. 

The  imports  as  well  as  the  exports  of  agricultural  products  reached 
their  highest  value  in  1906,  when  the  amount  was  $554,000,000.  or  less 
than  one-fourth  of  a  million  dollars  over  the  value  of  1905.  which  was 
then  the  highest  record.  The  principal  increases  over  1905  in  these 
imports  were  $20,000,000  for  packing-house  products,  almost  entirely 
composed  of  hides,  skins,  hair,  and  bristles:  $4,400,000  for  tobacco; 
$2,700,000  for  vegetable  fibers;  $1,900,000  each  for  seeds  and  vegeta- 
ble oils;  $1,800,000  for  fruits;  $1,200,000  for  nuts;  and  $1,100,000 
for  vegetables.     On  the  other  hand,  there  were  decreases  in  imports 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  15 

which  nearly  balanced  the  increases,  and  principal  among1  these  were 
coffee,  with  a  loss  of  $11,000,000;  sugar  and  molasses,  with  a  loss  of 
$12,600,000;  wool  and  silk,  with  a  loss  of  $7,000,000  each;  and  tea,  with 
a  loss  of  $1,650,000. 

The  principal  imported  articles  are  the  same  year  after  year,  and 
among  them  for  1906  the  imports  of  packing-house  products  were 
valued  at  $96,000,000;  of  sugar  and  molasses,  $86,000,000;  of  coffee, 
$73,000,000;  of  silk,  $54,000,000;  of  vegetable  fibers,  $50,000,000;  of 
wool,  $39,000,000;  of  tobacco,  $22,000^000;  of  fruits,  $21,500,000;  of 
tea,  $14,600,000;  and  of  vegetable  oils,  $12,600,000. 

FOREIGN  TRADE  IN  FOREST  PRODUCTS. 

On  account  of  the  increasing  value  of  forest  products,  the  exports 
of  these  commodities  in  1906  reached  a  considerably  higher  figure  than 
ever  before,  with  a  value  of  $77,000,000,  or  $13,748,000  more  than 
in  1905.  The  imports  of  these  products  also  increased  in  value  by 
$3,000,000;  all  items  exhibit  an  increase  except  india  rubber,  the 
imports  of  which  declined  by  $4,800,000.  In  total  value  the  imports 
of  forest  products  were  $95,700,000  in  1906,  an  amount  far  above  that 
of  any  preceding  year  except  1905. 

BALANCE    OF    TRADE. 

The  so-called  balance  of  trade  in  the  international  exchange  of  agri- 
cultural commodities  continues  to  run  in  favor  of  this  country  by  an 
enormous  amount;  for  1906  the  agricultural  exports  exceeded  similar 
imports  by  $433,000,000,  an  amount  which  places  this  year  with  the 
seven  high  years  beginning  with  1898  and  much  above  the  balance  of 
1905.  This  new  foreign  credit,  which  equaled  that  of  a  rich  nation, 
was  mostly  offset  by  large  borrowings  in  this  country  from  Europe  for 
the  purpose  of  enlarging  railroads  and  other  capital. 

While  the  farmer  placed  to  the  National  credit  in  other  countries 
$433,000,000  in  1906,  other  producers,  all  included,  secured  a  balance 
in  favor  of  this  country  of  only  $85,000,000.  During  the  last  seven- 
teen years  the  farmer  has  built  up  a  balance  of  trade  in  foreign 
exchange  of  agricultural  products  amounting  to  $6,068,000,000,  while 
all  other  producers  find  themselves  at  the  end  of  the  same  period  with 
a  total  on  the  debtor  side  of  the  account  to  the  extent  of  $459,000,000. 

INCREASE    OF   FARMING    CAPITAL. 

Having  produced  fabulous  wealth  during  the  year  and  having  sent 
to  foreign  countries  out  of  the  wealth  of  the  preceding  year  enough 
to  pay  the  interest-bearing  national  debt,  the  farmer  may  now  take 
account  of  his  farming  capital.  The  large  rate  of  increase  in  its  value 
since  1900  is  not  a  mere  matter  of  a  higher  price  level  and  higher  land 
values.     In  the  meantime  the  farmer  has  earned  a  surplus  income, 


16  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

much  of  which  he  has  invested  in  his  farming  equipment,  in  buildings, 
in  many  improvements,  in  live  stock,  in  machinery,  and  in  furtherance 
of  the  comforts  and  pleasures  of  living. 

REAL    ESTATE    AND    FARM    EQUIPMENT. 

The  farm  real  estate,  as  ascertained  by  this  Department  last  year, 
increased  in  value  $6,131,000,000  since  the  census  year,  or  enough  to 
raise  the  census  value  to  $22. 715,000,000.  Domestic  animals  were 
worth  $2, 979. 000,000.  according  to  the  census  enumerators,  and  now 
they  are  estimated  to  be  worth  more  than  $1.000, 000,000.  There  has 
been  a  very  active  demand  for  implements  and  machinery,  not  only 
by  farmers  who  have  become  financially  able  for  the  first  time  to  buy, 
as  in  the  South,  but  by  farmers  already  provided  with  them,  who  have 
needed  to  reduce  their  dependence  upon  human  labor  by  getting  more 
serviceable  machines. 

If  real  estate,  domestic  animals,  other  live  stock,  and  implements 
and  machinery  are  combined,  the  farmers'  capital,  as  composed  of 
these  items,  has  increased  by  perhaps  $8,000,000,000  since  the 
census  valuation,  or  about  10  per  cent,  and  now  amounts  to  perhaps 
528,000,000,000. 

DOMESTIC    ANIMALS. 

The  domestic  animals  of  the  farm  number  about  200,000,000  at 
the  time  for  which  it  is  estimated  by  the  Department,  which  is  Janu- 
ary 1.  Strictly  beef  cattle,  sheep,  and  swine  are  each  one-fourth  of 
the  total,  and  dairy  cows  and  draft  animals  each  about  one-tenth. 
The  value  of  these  animals  has  increased  during  the  year,  and  only 
a  very  rough  estimate  can  now  say  how  much,  in  advance  of  the 
careful  estimate  to  be  made  in  January.  Perhaps  the  gain  is  about 
$100,000,000;  at  any  rate,  the  increase  seems  to  be  as  much  as  10  per 
cent. 

MEAT    SUPPLY. 
NUMBER    OF    ANIMALS    SLAUGHTERED. 

Upon  the  farmers'  vast  herds  of  meat  animals  the  nation  depends 
for  its  most  expensive  class  of  foods  in  various  kinds  of  meat  and  for 
one-third  of  its  dietary.  The  figures  of  meat  production,  which  are 
the  result  of  a  recent  large  and  searching  investigation  by  this  Depart- 
ment, strikingly  express  the  magnitude  of  the  farmer's  occupation,  as 
evidenced  by  only  one  of  its  branches,  and  the  largeness  of  its  per- 
formance in  national  sustenance  and  exports. 

In  the  last  census  year,  1900,  93,502,000  meat  animals  were  slaugh- 
tered and  exported,  and  of  these  18,809,000  were  cattle,  including 
calves;  21,518,000  were  sheep,  including  lambs;  and  over  one-half,  or 
50,115,000,  were  hogs.  Every  time  the  clock  ticks  a  second  during 
ten  hours  of  a  workday  the  farmer  drives  nine  meat  animals  to  the 
butcher. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  17 


POUNDS    OF    MEAT    PRODUCED. 


The  meat  production  of  1900,  in  terms  of  dressed  weight  and  weight 
of  edible  parts  not  included  in  dressed  weight,  was  19,186,330,000 
pounds,  of  which  2, 1-33, 035,000  pounds,  or  12.68  per  cent,  were 
exported,  so  that  the  national  consumption  was  16,753,295,000  pounds. 

Such  great  numbers  may  be  better  understood  if  they  are  reduced 
to  the  average  of  the  census  private  family,  1.6  persons.  To  such  a 
family  in  1900  the  farmer  supplied  49  pounds  of  veal,  131  pounds  of 
beef,  30  pounds  of  lamb,  39  pounds  of  mutton,  and  165  pounds  of 
pork,  including  lard,  or,  in  all,  1,011  pounds  of  meat,  amounting  to 
half  a  ton. 

If  the  exports  had  been  consumed  at  home,  they  would  have  given 
to  each  family  more  beef  than  the  foregoing  by  50  pounds,  more  pork 
by  97  pounds,  or  together  117  pounds. 

In  the  consumption  of  meat,  expressed  in  terms  of  entire  animals, 
each  family  asks  the  farmer  for  over  one-third  of  a  calf,  over  two- 
thirds  of  a  steer  or  cow,  over  three-fourths  of  a  lamb,  nearly  three- 
fourths  of  a  sheep,  and  two  and  one-half  hogs,  and  the  farmer 
responds  so  liberally  that  one-eighth  of  his  supply  is  left  over  for  the 
foreigner.  It  is  upon  the  selling  of  this  surplus  in  foreign  countries 
that  the  farmer  depends  for  the  maintenance  of  profitable  prices  for 
his  meat  animals. 

LAROE    PLACE    OF   THE    SURPLUS    INr   THE    WORLD'S   TRADE. 

This  fraction  of  one-eighth  is  small,  but  it  becomes  remarkably 
magnified  when  it  crosses  the  Atlantic  Ocean.  The  national  surplus 
of  meat  for  one  .year,  if  composed  of  the  different  kinds  as  actually 
used  in  consumption,  is  sufficient  to  feed  either  the  United  Kingdom 
or  the  German  Empire  for  nearly  half  a  year,  or  both  for  nearly  one- 
fourth  of  a  }Tear,  and  the  population  of  these  two  countries  in  1901 
was  98,000,000,  as  compared  with  a  population  of  76,000,000  in  this 
country  the  }*ear  before. 

This  little  fraction  of  the  national  product  of  meat  which  goes  to 
other  countries  looks  large  when  viewed  in  another  aspect.  In  the 
world's  international  trade  in  packing-house  products  and  live  meat 
animals  the  place  occupied  by  the  exports  from  the  United  States  is 
indicated  by  about  10  per  cent  of  the  total  value. 

IMPORTANCE    OF   SWIXE. 

As  a  meat  producer,  the  importance  of  the  hog  appears  in  the  fore- 
going statement.  The  yearly  turnover  or  slaughter  of  hogs  is  equal 
to  about  four-fifths  of  the  number  on  hand  June  1,  and  the  meat,  in- 
cluding lard,  produced  in  1900  was  9,279,583,000  pounds,  or  more  than 

3    A1906 2 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    A6BICULTTJBE. 

half  a  billion  pounds  over  the  8,771,2  pounds  of  year  and  beef, 

and  _ht  times  the  1,1  ainds  of  lamb  and  mutton. 

Id  i         State  alone.  Iowa,  the  pork  products  for  1906,  includii 

5  to  nearly  the  entire  exports  of  the  meat 
products  of  swine  in  Should  Iovra  suddenly  lo  rine,  for 

the  time  g     xports  of  their  products  must  substantially  cease  or 

the  home  consumption  of  them  be  reduced  one-fifth. 

Briefly  mentioned,  such  are  some  of  the  main  results  of  the  Depart- 
ment's investigation  of  the  meat  supply.     They  indicate  the  pro 
tions  of  the  part  that  the  farmer  of  this  country  take-,  in  only  one 
direction  of  his  work,  as  a  provider  of  meat  to  n<  I  fellow- 

countrymen  and  to  the  rest  of  mankind. 

COHSUHKBB'    yearly  meat  bill. 

Meat  consumers,  as  well  as  farmers  who  are  meat  producers,  have 
concern  with  the  national  dietary.  This  nutritive  element  contributes 
one-third  or  more  of  the  total  assimilated  nutrients  of  the  diet 
both  in  pounds  of  protein,  or  flesh-forming  material,  and  in  calories  off 
energy.  In  expense  to  the  consumer  the  fraction  is  undoubtedly 
much  larger.  The  investigations  of  the  National  Bureau  of  Labor  into 
the  retail  prices  of  food  indicate,  for  the  many  representative  family 
budgets  included  in  the  investigation--,  that  the  average  retail  price  of 
meat,  for  all  kinds  in  the  proportions  of  actual  consumption,  was  2 
cent-  in  1900,  13  cents  i  and  13*  cents  in  1905;  the  average 

increased,  perhaps,  to  13f,  or  at  the  most  to  14.  cents  in  1 

At  these  average  meat  prices  and  with  the  meat  consumption  of  1 
national  retail  meat  bill  was  279.  .  and  it 

Every   increase  of   one- 
:h  of  a  cent  per  pound  in  the  national  av  rail  price  of  meat 

raises  the  total  yearly  expense  to  consumer-   by  $41,  The 

increase  of  one  cent  a  pound   since   1900   cost   consumers  this 
si;;;.-   : 

FUTURE    PRODUCTION. 

PATOIS    OF   TITE    PAST. 

The  mighty  production  of  the  farm  for  one-third  of  a  century  has 
come  out  of  an  agriculture  having  many  faults.     In  a  large  degree 
en  one-crop  farming:  crop  rotation,  as  practiced,  has  often 
a  too  short  and  ui  _      .  _     crops 

have  been  negle  -lie  animals  .  ntly  entered 

into  the  farm  economy,  and  man  .  have  been  kept  at  a 

The  fertilizer-  made  on  the  farm  have  been  regarded  as  a  nuisance  in 
•  regions:  they  have  been  wasted  and  misapplied  by  many  farm- 
ers; humus  has  not  been  plowed  into  the  ground  as  generally  a-  it 
ild  have  been:  and  in  many  a  place  the  unprotected  soil  has  been 
wa.-hed  into  the  streams. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  19 


IX.  >N<  IMIC   JUSTIFICATION. 


This,  in  few  words,  is  the  historic  story  of  agriculture  in  a  new 
country ;  yet  the  course  of  agriculture  in  this  country,  had  as  it  may 
seem  in  its  unscientific  aspect,  has  had  large  economic  justification. 
While  pioneers,  poor  and  in  debt,  are  establishing  themselves  they 
have  no  capital,  even  if  they  had  the  knowledge,  with  which  to  earn- 
on  agriculture  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  critic.  They  must  have  build- 
ings, machinery,  and  live  stock,  even  at  the  expense  of  the  soil. 

Millions  upon  millions  of  acres  of  fresh  land  have  been  coming 
into  production  faster  than  domestic  consumption  has  required,  and, 
at  times,  beyond  the  takings  of  importing  countries.  For  many 
years  the  farmer  was  threatened  with  -±0-cent  wheat.  20-cent  corn,  and 
5-cent  cotton,  and  at  times  he  was  face  to  face  with  the  hard  condi- 
tions implied  in  these  destructive  prices.  A  more  scientific  agricul- 
ture would  have  raised  wheat  that  no  one  wanted  to  cat.  corn  to  store 
on  the  farm  and  perhaps  eventually  to  be  used  for  fuel,  and  cotton 
not  worth  the  picking. 


LARGER    PRODUCTION    INDICATED. 


So  it  has  happened,  with  reason,  that  the  production  per  acre  has 
been  low:  but  there  is  no  likelihood  that  low  production  is  iixed  and 
that  the  farmer  must  continue  his  extensive  system.  When  consump- 
tion demands  and  when  prices  sustain,  the  farmer  will  respond.  The 
doors  of  knowledge  and  example  are  opening  wider  to  him. 

There  is  abundant  information  concerning  crop  rotation,  the  depend- 
ence of  high  production  upon  the  domestic  animals,  concerning  grasses, 
clover,  and  alfalfa,  and  concerning  the  mixing  of  vegetable  matter 
with  the  soil.  Systems  of  farm  management  and  soil  treatment  have 
assumed  greater  importance  in  their  effect  upon  production;  and 
there  is  the  breeding  of  plants,  which  alone  can  multiply  production 
so  as  to  glut  the  market. 


MC'.Tiri.ICATIOX    OF    THE    COTTON    CROP. 


If  there  were  need  to  do  so,  the  cotton  farmer  and  planter  could 
double  the  present  crop  of  two-fifths  of  a  bale  per  acre,  and  the  feat 
would  need  nothing  more  than  demonstrated  and  well  -understood  prin- 
ciples of  farm  management.  It  would  be  no  work  of  magic  to  multiply 
the  production  of  cotton  per  acre  by  3  and  get  a  bale  and  a  quarter; 
and,  besides  this,  the  planter  has  more  than  three  times  the  pit  sent 
actual  acreage  in  cotton  readily  available  and  awaiting  his  use.  More 
than  the  present  area  of  cotton  can  thus  be  grown  in  a  three-year  crop 
rotation  when  the  needs  of  the  world  demand  it. 


20  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


r   CORK. 


In  accordance  with  principles  demonstrated,  known,  and  applicable, 

bints  of  which  have  been  given,  the  corn  crop  per  acre  can  be  increased 

by  one-half  within  a  quarter  of  a  century,  and  without  any  pretense 

the  limit  has  been  reached.     No  wizard's  services  are  needed  for 

this,  but  just  education. 

MORE    WHEAT   PER   ACRE. 

The  same  statement  is  applicable  to  wheat.  There  is  no  sensible 
n  whv  half  as  much  again  wheat  may  not  be  had  from  an  acre 
within  less  than  a  generation  of  time.  It  is  only  a  question  of  knowl- 
edge, of  education,  of  cultural  system,  and  of  farm  management,  all 
of  which  learning  is  and  will  be  at  the  service  of  the  farmer  as  he 
needs  it. 

GATS    IN*    OTHER    CROPS. 

Equally  feasible  is  a  50  per  cent  increase  in  the  crops  per  acre 

of  oats,   barley,  rye.  and  buckwheat.     Potatoes,  instead  of  growing 

-  -    than   100   bushels   per   acre,    should   double    their    production. 

Wherever  only  -  K)  pounds  of  tobacco  are  got  from  an  acre, 

-fourths  of  a  ton  is  the  prospect. 

Fruits,  berries,  and  vegetables  have  a  future  too  large  to  estimate. 

The  cannery  and  the  railway  fast  freight  and  refrigerator  car  have 

•ome  obstacles  of  latitude,  of  longitude,  and  of  season,  and  there 

erv  indication  that  the  farmer  can  supply  any  possible  demand 

for  these  foods  at  home  or  abroad. 

AXIMAL    PRODUCTS. 

Farmers  will  learn  how  to  feed  more  prolific  breeds  and  strains  of 

ne  than  the  ones  which  they  are  now  chiefly  raising,  and  thus  will 

pork  and  its  products  be  increased  per  individual  of  the  permanent 

k  of  hogs.     One -fourth  of  the  dairy  cows  of  the  country  do  not 

for  their  feed,  and  more  than  half  of  them  do  not  return  any 

profit;  in  proportion  as  the  dairyman  weighs  the  milk  of  each  cow  and 

applies  the  Babeock  test  will  he  increase  the  supply  of  milk,  butter. 

and  cheese.     It  is  merely  a  matter  of  education. 

Poultry  is  one  of  the  steady  and  helpful  sources  of  farm  income. 
Movements  are  already  on  foot  which  may  be  expected  to  incr 
the  egg  production  per  hen  by  at  least  a  dozen  per  year  within  a  gen- 
ion;  and  there  are  poultrymen  who  are  not  enthusiasts  who  t 
tell  double  that  increase.  If  the  hens  of  this  year  had  each  laid  a 
dozen  egg>  more  than  they  did,  the  increased  value  of  this  product 
would  have  been  possibly  $£    , 

DUCATION. 

The  farmer  will  not  fail  the  nation  if  the  nation  does  not  fail  the 
farmer.     He  will  need  education  to  know  the  powers  of  the  soil  which 


REPORT    OF    THE    feECKFTARY.  21 

are  now  hidden  from  him.     The  prospective  yeany  oxpenditure  of 

$10,000,000  for  educational  and  research  work  by  Nation  and  States, 
with  such  increases  as  may  come  from  time  to  time,  must  have  enor- 
mous effects.  There  may  1  >e  agricultural  schools  for  the  small  children, 
and  agricultural  high  schools  for  the  larger  ones,  and  their  education 
will  be  continued  in  the  colleges. 

The  work  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture  has  already  had  results 
which  are  valued  at  hundreds  of  millions  of  dollars  annually,  and  yet 
the  Department  feels  that  it  has  barely  crossed  the  threshold  of  its  mis- 
sion of  discovery  and  education.  Cooperating  to  the  same  ends  arc  60 
experiment  stations  in  51  States  and  Territories,  the  63  agricultural 
colleges,  thousands  of  farmers*  institute  meetings  yearly,  many  excellent 
agricultural  periodical  publications  and  new  instructive  books.  Then 
there  is  a  new  line  of  work  which  is  so  productive  of  results  that  it  is 
constantly  extending,  and  that  is  the  demonstration  farm,  the  encour- 
agement of  individual  farmers  to  change  their  agriculture  so  as  to 
multiply  their  yields  and  their  profits,  and  thus  afford  object  lessons 
to  other  farmers. 

Thus  it  appears  that  forces  are  now  at  work  which  will  very  consid- 
erably increase  the  production  of  the  farms  within  a  generation,  and 
which  promise  to  continue  the  increase  indefinitely.  He  who  would 
write  the  last  chapter  of  the  progress  of  the  agriculture  of  this  country 
must  await  the  procession  of  the  centuries. 

OPENING    OF   A    NEW    ERA. 

The  farmer  is  financially  in  a  position  now  to  do  what  he  could  not 
have  done  previous  to  the  recent  years  of  his  prosperity. 

ADVANCE    OF    FARMERS*    WELFARE. 

National  welfare  has  been  promoted  by  few  revolutions  in  agricul- 
tural economics  to  the  extent  that  it  has  been  and  will  be  promoted  by 
10-cent  cotton.  The  greater  part  of  the  cotton  planters  are  out  of 
their  former  bondage  to  future  maintenance,  and  they  are  paying  no 
enormous  rates  of  interest  for  advancements— rates  which  were  esti- 
mated fifteen  years  ago  to  average  40  per  cent  a  year. 

In  the  Middle  West  the  prosperity  of  the  farmers  during  the  last 
half  dozen  years  and  over  has  advanced  in  such  mass  and  with  such 
speed  that  no  parallel  can  be  found  in  the  economic  history  of  agri- 
culture. One  of  the  great  changes  that  have  come  over  this  region 
is  the  conversion  of  a  million  agricultural  debtors,  paying  high  rates 
of  interest  and  finding  great  difficulty  in  procuring  the  wherewithal 
out  of  prices  much  too  low,  into  financially  independent  farmers,  del  it- 
free,  and  begging  the  banks  to  receive  their  savings  at  as  small  a  rate 
of  interest  as  2  per  cent. 


22  YEARBOOK   OF    THE   DEPARTMENT    Ox    ACffilCTTLTUEE. 


Farmer-  are  using  -their  new  capital  to  abolish  the  waste  places  of 
the  land.     The  river  is  leveed  and  alluvial  bottoms  subject  to  overflow 
become  worth  hundreds  of  dollars  per  acre  for  vegetables:  a  mar 
drained  by  ditch<  liles  and  celery  make>  it  the  most  valuable 

land  in  the  county:  semiarid  land  is  ^ntly  cultivated  so  as  to  make 

a  mulch  of  finely  pulverized  earth  on  the  surface,  and  the  crops  that 
it  will  grow  make  the  farmer  prosperous;  durum  wheat  or  alfalfa  is 
luced  and  again  the  -  are  made  to  do  the  will  of 

the  cultivator:  legumino:  give  humus  and  nitrogen  to  the  sandy 

and  profit  of  the  farmer:  the  unused  rocky,  stony 
field  or  mountain  •  both  to  the  economic  and  to  the 

ith  the  apple,  the  peach,  the  pear,  and  the 
plum,  and  adds  to  the  evidences  that  every  square  foot  of  the  land 
may  be  made  productive  unless  it  is  arid:  and  even  then  irrigation 
work^  as  far  as  water  is  available,  swell  the  evidence.     Along  all  of 

:  production  using  their  newly  acquired 

tal  and  are  :  .  :  before  in  their  prosperity. 

-     rmerly  there  was  an  abundance  of  farm  labor  and  a  dearth  of 

fanning  capital:  i  editions  are  reversed  and  lal  f.rce 

and  capital  abuudan  idiog  the  farmers*  inability  to  do 

some  thing's  for  want  of  labor,  the  new  situation  i-  a  great  improve- 

the  old  one.     The  farmer  can  now  employ  every  labor- 

g  device  and  thus  reduce  both  the  labor  and  the  cost  of  produc- 

:  he  can  raise  his  land  to  a  higher  state  of  fertility  than  can  be 

made  by  chemical  fertilizers  alone,  because  he  can  advance  the  nc 

capital  for  perm  .1  improvement  and  is  in  a  position  to  await 

roduee  things  that  requi.  for  the  first  cro] 

in  the  case  of  fruits:  he  can  teeded  to     is- 

and  thus  co  a  to  kirn  to  a  gn 

extent  than  ever  before:  he  can  .-ecure  a  better  education  for  his 
children  to  the  end.  among  other  thing>.  that  they  may  do  better  with 
the  old  farm  than  he  did. 


LOOK. 


The  farmer's  standard  of  living  is  rising  higher  and  higher.     The 
::ion  things  of  his  farm  go  to  the  city  to  become  luxuries.     He  is 
becomir._  hone  and  his  daily  mail  and 

-paper.     Hi-  healthful    to    body  and  sane    to  mind,  and 

I  fever  of  the  city  have  not  become  the  craving  of  his 
nerves,  nor  his  ideal  of  t:  sores  of  life.     A  new  dignity 

agriculture,  along-  with  its  economic  strength;  and  the 
farmer  has  a  new  horizon  far  that  of  his  prairie  and  his  moun- 

tains, which  is  more  promising  than  the  sky-line  of  the  city. 


REPORT  of  the  secretary.  23 

For  the  abundance  that  ator  has  -  1  the  farmer  in  sap- 

plying,  for  the  stability  of  the  national  agriculture,  and  for  the  com- 
forting prospect  of  a  future,  there  are  many  evidences  that  the 
people  are  ready  to  join  in  a  day  of  revere  you-;  Thanksgiving. 

It  is  no  little  gratifi  bo  the  head  of  this  Department  in  pre- 

senting the  foregoing  picture  of  the  far::  momy  of 

the  country  and  picturing  the  possibilities  of  his  future  to  realize  that 
this  Department  and  its  work  have  had  an  important  share  in  the 
development  which  ha-;  culminated  in  the  farmer's  present  prosperity, 
and  that  they  are  bound,  if  intelligently  and  generously  administered, 
to  play  an  important  part  in  the  future  of  American  agriculture. 
Wfth  this  thought  in  mind  I  will  proceed  to  present  for  your  coi 
eration  a  review  of  the  various  channels  through  which  the  Department 
performs  it^  important  work  and  to  place  on  record  what  has  been 
done  through  them  during  the  past  year. 

WEATHER   BUREAU. 
FORECASTS   AXD    WAR  XI N 

The  Weather  Bureau  has  issued  warnings  of  dangerous  gales  on  the 
Great  Lakes  and  along  the  seacoasts.  and  has  kept  the  great  commer- 
cial  and   agricultural   Interests    of    the   country  as    fully 
■>le  of  the  coming  of  adverse  weather  conditi 

EXT  OF    THE    FIELD    OF    OBSERVATION. 

Irs  tieki  of  observation  i-  being  gradually  extended  in  the  hope  that 
a  view  of  the  atmospheric  conditions  which  prevail  over  the  great 
oceanic  and  continental  area-  will  prove  of  especial  value  is  making 
forecasts  for  this  country.     The   two  points  from  which  advic-  - 
atmospheric  changes  are  most  desin  sent  are  Siberia  and  the 

region  in  and  about  Bering  Sea.  It  is  hoped  to  obtain  reports  from 
Sil  ria  through  the  courtesy  of  the  Russian  [Meteorological  Service. 
The  laying  of  a  cable  by  the  United  States  Signal  Servi  ■-/meeting 

Alaska  with  this  country,  makes  it  feasible  to  secure  much-desired 
weather  reports  from  that  part  of  the  globe. 

EXTEXSIOX    OF    STORM-WARNING    SERVICE    TO    VESSELS    AT    SEA. 

During  the  year  a  plan  has  been  perfected  whereby  vessels  at 
equipped,  with  wireless  telegraphic  apparatus  may  receive  warnings  of 
re  storms  if  within  communicating  distance  of  shore  stations,  or 
of  other  vessels  which  have  received  a  warning. 

OBSERVATORY    BUILDINGS. 

Five  observatory  buildings  have  been  completed  during  the  year, 
and  one  (the  physical  laboratory  at  Mount  Weather,  Va.)  has  been 
partially  completed.  The  number  of  buildings  of  all  classes  now 
owned  and  occupied  by  the  Weather  Bureau  is  41. 


24  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

DISTRIBUTION    OF    FORECASTS   THROUGH    TELEPHONE    EXCHANGES. 

The  number  of  telephone  subscribers  receiving  the  daily  forecasts 
on  June  30,  1905,  was  464,738.  This  number  was  augmented  during 
the  year  by  over  half  a  million,  so  that  at  the  close  of  this  fiscal  year 
more  than  a  million  telephone  subscribers  were  receiving  the  daily 
forecasts. 

INVESTIGATION   OF    FROST    CONDITIONS    IN    CRANBERRY    DISTRICTS. 

A  special  investigation  has  been  carried  on  during  a  part  of  the 
year,  having  as  its  object  the  establishment  of  a  scientific  basis  for 
accurate  frost  predictions  in  the  cranberry  regions  of  the  country, 
especially  in  Wisconsin.  The  conditions  of  both  soil  and  air  which 
shortly  precede  and  accompany  frost  have  been  studied  closely,  and 
valuable  data  have  been  secured. 

INCREASE    IN    THE   WEATHER    SERVICE. 

The  utilities  of  the  Weather  Bureau  are  such  that  there  is  a  constant 
and  growing  demand  for  an  extension  of  the  service  so  as  to  provide 
for  telegraphing  and  publishing  more  meteorological  data  and  estab- 
lishing additional  Weather  Bureau  stations.  However,  special  effort 
is  made  to  meet  these  demands  with  the  existing  appropriation,  and 
no  request  that  involves  asking  Congress  for  additional  funds  is 
honored  except  after  a  careful  and  thorough  investigation  of  the 
necessities  of  the  case. 

There  is  already  an  extensive  output  of  meteorological  information 
that  comes  from  the  1S3  full  meteorological  stations  maintained  by  the 
Bureau  and  from  several  hundred  stations  reporting  only  temperature 
and  rainfall.  The  daily  output  finds  its  way  to  the  public  mainly 
through  the  columns  of  the  newspapers  and  in  the  maps  and  bulletins 
issued  at  Washington  and  outlying  stations.  Outside  of  Washington 
there  are  105  stations  which  issue  an  aggregate  of  25,000  weather  maps 
daily,  making  a  yearly  issue  of  over  8,000,000  copies.  The  number  of 
monthly  climatological  reports  printed  at  40  different  section  centers 
1,944,  being  an  average  of  about  700  copies  per  month  from  each 
center;  these  contain  the  daily  climatological  features  of  various 
climatic  districts.  There  is  a  constant  demand  from  agricultural,  com- 
mercial, and  shipping  interests  for  an  additional  amount  of  such  data. 

MOUNT    WEATHER    RESEARCH    OBSERVATORY. 

Progress  has  been  made  in  the  establishment  of  the  Mount  Weather 
Research  Observatory.  A  station  of  the  first  order  has  been  main- 
tained throughout  the  year  for  taking  and  telegraphing  reports  that 
are  useful  in  making  forecasts. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  25 

In  the  preparation  for  kite  and  balloon  work,  a  number  of  import- 
ant instruments  have  been  installed  and  made  ready  for  systematic 
work.  Observations  of  the  upper  air  are  now  being  regularly  taken 
in  concert  with  similar  aerial  research  institutions  in  foreign  countries. 

The  interior  finishings  of  the  magnetic  observatory  buildings,  the 
erection  of  the  piers,  and  the  installation  of  the  magnetic  instruments 
were  completed  during  the  }rear,  and  automatic  and  other  records  are 
now  being  continuously  made. 

RECORDS   OF   EARTHQUAKES. 

The  attention  drawn  to  scientific  observation  of  earthquakes  by  the 
calamity  that  befell  San  Francisco  on  April  18,  last,  has  prompted  the 
Department  to  authorize  the  Weather  Bureau  to  install  an  additional 
number  of  instruments  at  places  of  observation  where  the  Department 
owns  buildings  and  suitable  ground.  It  is  probable  that  during  the 
coming  year  about  15  or  20  additional  stations  will  be  equipped  with 
seismographs,  so  that  the  progress  across  our  continent  of  earth 
vibrations  can  be  more  accurately  measured  and  the  data  submitted  for 
scientific  discussion.  These  additional  observations  can  be  secured 
with  only  the  expense  involved  in  the  purchase  of  instruments  and 
their  installation. 

BUREAU  OF  ANIMAL  INDUSTRY. 
THE    MEAT   INSPECTION. 

Meat  inspection  has  been  for  several  months  a  very  live  topic  before 
the  public.  During  the  year  the  Federal  meat  inspection  was  con- 
ducted by  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  at  163  establishments  in  58 
cities,  and  42, 901, 284  animals  were  inspected  at  the  time  of  slaughter, 
nearly  all  of  them  having  also  been  previously  inspected  in  stock 
3^ards.  This  represents  the  greatest  amount  of  work  done  in  any  one 
year  since  the  inspection  was  inaugurated  in  1891.  Of  the  animals 
inspected,  158,953  carcasses  and  126,159  parts  of  carcasses  were  con- 
demned for  disease  or  other  cause.  The  total  cost  of  the  meat  inspec- 
tion, including  the  microscopic  inspection  of  pork  •  for  export  to 
certain  countries,  was  $852,561.70. 

The  importance  of  more  thorough  meat  inspection  and  sanitation  las 
been  forcibly  shown  by  the  recent  agitation  and  investigations  relat- 
ing to  some  of  the  paeking-house  methods.  The  new  law  which  was 
designed  to  correct  certain  evils  was  passed  by  Congress  June  30,  1906, 
and  hence  the  work  of  the  fiscal  year  under  review  was  performed 
under  former  laws,  which  were,  in  many  respects,  defective  and  unsat- 
isfactory. The  act  of  March  3,  1891,  as  amended  March  2,  1895,  pro- 
vided for  the  inspection  of  all  live  cattle  intended  for  export  or  whose 
carcasses  or  products  were  intended  for  export;  also  for  the  manda- 
tory ante-mortem    inspection   of    cattle,    sheep,    and   hogs,    and   the 


26  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMEXT    OF    AGBICTXLTUBE. 

add:  assive   post-mori  pection  of  their  carcasses  for 

interstate   trade.     It  has  never  been  <\  however,  to  apply  the 

all  the  establishments  coming'  within  the  law.  since  the 
rheient    for    that     purpose.      Many 
.  ments  which  desired  inspection  have  badl  refused  because 

;k  of  funds  to  e?ctend  the  service.     Many  that  should  have  been 
compelled    t  :i  were  able  to   avoid  it.  as  the  former 

j'ompell  tion  only  in  the  .  export  I' 

The  law  grave  the  Department  no  authority  whatever  to  control  the 
itation  o:  rent  adulters 

or  the  use  of  chemicals  and  preservatives:  nor  was  any  authority  given 
for  following  up  meats  which  had  once  been  inspected  and  passed  imme- 
diately after  slaughter,  or  for  conciemniii,.  :h  meat  which  might 
afterwa.                         me  unwholesome  or  and  r  during  the 
process  of  canning  or  packing  or  before  being  placed  on  the  market. 
lection  was  therefore  practically  limited  to  the  ante-mortem 
inspection  of  ani        -                     -pection  of  the  carcasses  immediately 
after  slaughl                ?  meat   found  free  from  disease  and  otherwise 
wholesome  at  the  time  of  this  post-mortem  inspection  i  erly 
ked,  and  that  found  di                                                 lestroyed.     This 
■etion  was  efficient  so  far  as  it  went,  and  it  wont  as  far  a-  the  law 
and  the  limited  appropriations  permitted.     In  its  efforts  to  maintain  an 

inspection  the  Department  sometimes  even  assumed  auth< 
not  conferred  by  law.  notably   by  requiring  the  destruction  of  con- 
demned carca sses.     In  all  the  recent  agitation  the  who! 

Beat  lias  not  beei    -  ioned.     The  dis- 

clo>  .^satisfactory  conditions  have  related  almost  wholly  to  I 

over  which  the  Department  had  no  1-  \\  as  the 

_   -.  and  cured  m<  ..  the  use  of 

ad  the  insanitary  condition  and  -  of  the  packing 

-. 
Realizing  the  shortcomings  of   the  old  law.  the  Department   has 
recommended  the  enactment  of  new  legi-da- 
the  increase  of  appropri  on  and  improve- 

ment of  the  service.     Bills  designed  to  remedy  some  of  the  del 
at  different  tim<  .need  in  Congress  but  failed  to  p: 

Even  before  the  appearance  of  recent  pal  -  criticizing  the 

aitary  conditions  at  the  Chicago  stock  yards  and  packing  hor-   -. 
and   reflecting  upon  the  Federal  m  tion  servi  had 

.   taken   to  invest  -  •    matter-.      A  c  >nan  ttti  •    consisting 

of  Dr.  John  R.   Mohler,  chief  of  the  Pathological  Division  of  the 
Bureau  1  Industry.  Dr.  Rice  P.  S  .  chief  of  the  In- 

tion  .  and  Mr.  licitor  of 

the  Department,  was  -out  to  Chicago  and  made  a  thorough  investigation, 
y  made  an  exhaustive  report,  which  was  promptly  transmitted  to 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  27 

the  President  and  was  afterwards  by  him  laid  before  Congress.  An 
independent  investigation  was  also  made  under  the  President's  direc- 
tion by  Messrs.  Charles  P.  Neill  and  James  B.  Reynolds.  Prompt  and 
vigorous  measures  were  taken  to  remedy  the  conditions  disclosed  by 
the  reports  of  these  committees,  but  it  was  realized  that  the  Depart- 
ment could  do  very  little  under  existing  law  and  that  the  real  remedy 
lay  in  new  legislation  backed  by  public  sentiment. 

Such  new  legislation  was  provided  by  Congress  in  the  so-called 
meat-inspection  amendment  to  the  agricultural  appropriation  act  of 
June  30, 1906.  This  law  provides  for  a  more  thorough  and  comprehen- 
sive inspection  system  and  makes  a  permanent  annual  appropriation 
of  $3,000,000  to  pa}'  the  cost  of  the  inspection.  With  the  greater 
authority  now  vested  in  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture  and  with  the 
largely  increased  appropriation,  the  service  will  be  greatly  extended 
in  scope  and  in  the  number  of  establishments  and  quantity  of  product 
covered.  The  inspection  will  be  extended  as  rapidly  as  possible  to 
establishments  engaged  in  interstate  or  foreign  commerce  and  which 
come  within  the  law.  It  will  be  applied  not  only  to  the  live  animals 
before  slaughter  and  their  carcasses  at  the  time  of  slaughter,  as  here- 
tofore, but  also  to  the  meats  and  meat  food  products  in  all  the  subse- 
quent stages  and  processes  of  preparation,  curing,  canning,  etc.  Sani- 
tary equipment,  conditions,  and  methods  will  be  required,  the  use  of 
harmful  chemicals  and  preservatives  and  of  false  and  misleading  labels 
will  be  prevented,  and  the  transportation  of  meat  in  interstate  and  for- 
eign commerce  will  be  supervised  and  regulated.  It  is  probable  that  it 
will  be  necessary  to  request  Congress  to  appropriate  an  even  larger  sum 
to  provide  inspection  for  all  establishments  embraced  within  the  law. 

American  live  stock  has  long  been  considered  the  healthiest  in  the 
world.  With  our  enlarged  and  improved  inspection  system,  the  stamp 
of  the  Government  will  be  more  than  ever  a  mark  of  wholesomeness. 

We  must  not  imagine,  however,  that  since  the  packing  houses  have 
been  cleaned  up  and  the  inspection  improved  all  the  meat  found  in  our 
local  markets  may  be  considered  clean  and  wholesome.  It  must  be 
borne  in  mind  that  the  Federal  jurisdiction  is  limited  to  interstate  and 
foreign  commerce,  and  that  this  inspection  can  legally  be  applied  only 
to  establishments  doing  an  interstate  or  foreign  business.  To  be  sure, 
the  Department  insists  on  inspecting  the  entire  output  of  each  estab- 
lishment at  which  its  inspection  is  maintained,  even  though  part  of  the 
product  is  to  be  consumed  within  the  State;  but  the  Federal  inspec- 
tion does  not  and  can  not  reach  the  establishments  doing  business 
exclusively  within  a  State.  The  Department,  under  the  new  law,  can 
and  will  enforce  cleanliness  and  sanitation  in  the  establishments  doing 
an  interstate  and  export  business,  but  it  is  powerless  to  reach  the  local 
houses.  The  latter  must  be  looked  after  by  the  State  and  municipal 
authorities.     Each    State    or  community   must  protect  itself  against 


28  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

unwholesome  meats  originating  within  the  State.  In  the  absence  of 
an  efficient  local  inspection  the  consumer's  only  safety  lies  in  seeing 
that  meat  hears  the  Government  label. 

INSPECTION    OF    EXPORT    AXI">:     I  -. 

The  export  trade  in  live  animals  is  fostered  bj  the  inspection  con- 
ducted by  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry.  During  the  fiscal  year 
more  than  1  ■  inspections  were  made   before  exportation,  and 

over  half  a  million  animals  were  again  inspected  on  arrival  at  British 
ports  by  Bureau  inspectors  stationed  there.  Seven  hundred  and  forty- 
nine  inspections  of  vessels  carrying  export  animals  were  made  before 
clearance,  and  they  were  required  to  conform  to  certain  regulations 
■  space,  fittings,  attendants,  feed,  water,  ventilation,  etc.  The 
percentage  of  animals  lost  in  transit  was  less  than  one-quarter  of  1 
per  cent. 

INSPECTION   AND    QUARANTINE    OF   IMPORTED   ANIMALS. 

Our  domestic  live  stock  is  protected  from  the  contagion  of  destruc- 
tive diseases  which  exist  in  other  parts  of  the  world  by  a  rigid  system 
of  inspection  and  quarantine  of  imported  animals,  in  this  service 
during  the  year  168,600  animals  were  inspected,  and  1,898  of  these 
were  quarantined. 

The  quarantine  stations  on  the  Atlantic  seaboard,  with  one  excep 
tion,  are  in  satisfactory  condition.     The  station  near  Baltimore  will 
soon  have  to  lie  abandoned  because  of  the  dilapidated  condition  of  the 
buildings  and  the  building  up  of  that  locality.     When  a  suitable  I 
tion  i-  secured  an  appropriation  by  Congress  for  the  equipment  of  the 
new  station  will  l»e  necessary. 

I.    OF    CONTAGIOUS    DISEA£ 

The  work  for  the  control  and  eradication  of  contagious  diseas.es  of 
live  >tock  in  our  own  country  has  been  attended  with  encouraging 
result   .     Sheep  scab  and  cattle  mange,  which  a  few  y.  _      had 

spread  over  the  greater  part  of   the  Western  States,  are  gradually 

yielding  to  our  efforts.  It  is  believed  that  their  complete  eradication 
will  be  only  a  matter  of  a  few  years.  Duriug  the  year  sheep  scab  has 
n  greatly  diminished  in  Arizona  and  Idaho,  and  practically  .-tamped 
out  in  Utah  and  Wyoming.  Even  more  rapid  progress  has  been  made 
with  cattle  mange.  Washington  and  Oregon,  and  large  portions  of 
Kansas.  Colorado.  Wyoming.  Texas,  New  Mexico,  and  Oklahoma,  have 
been  freed  from  this  disease  and  released  from  quarantine,  and  it  is 
expected  that  the  same  will  soon  be  true  of  extensive  areas  in  North 
Dakota  and  South  Dakota  and  other  portions  of  Wyoming  and  Texas. 


EEPOET    OF    THE    SECRETARY. 


29 


Maladie  du  coit,  or  dourine.  an  insidious  venereal  disease  of  horse-, 
"which  existed  in  portions  of  South  Dakota.  Nebraska,  and  Iowa,  is 
now  believed  to  have  been  eradicated,  after  several  years  of  vigilant 
work.  Out  of  965  inspections  during  the  year  no  positive  cases  and 
but  3  suspicious  cases  were  found. 

ERADICATION    OF    THE    TEXAS-FEVER   TICK. 

Under  the  provisions  of  the  act  of  Congress  approved  June  30, 
1906,  appropriating  $82,500  to  enable  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture  to 
undertake  experimental  work  in  cooperation  with  State  authorities 
in  eradicating  the  ticks  transmitting  Southern  cattle  fever,  the  Depart- 
ment has  for  some  months  past  been  assisting  the  States  and  Terri- 
tories from  California  to  Virginia  along  these  lines.  Anticipating  the 
action  of  Congress  an  investigation  was  made  respecting  the  laws  of  the 
various  States,  and  through  the  various  attorneys-general  inquiry  was 
made  relative  to  the  existence  of  State  laws  under  which  the  Govern- 
ment could  undertake  the  work  of  tick  eradication.  It  was  found 
that,  while  some  State  laws  afford  ample  provisions,  other  States  either 
have  no  law  bearing  on  the  subject,  or  the  statutes  are  inadequate. 
The  table  following  shows  the  particular  points  covered  by  the  inves- 
tigation and  the  general  trend  of  the  information  received. 

-  of  state  laws  relating  to  quarantine,  disinfection,  etc. 


Alabama  . 
Arkansas . 


California  , 


Florida 

Georgia 

Indian  Territory 

Kentucky  

Louisiana 

Mississippi. 


Questions  and  answers. 


Are  local  officers  author- 
ized and  empowered  to 
enter  premises  to  in- 
spect live  stock  and 
enforce  quarantine, 
including  counties, 
districts,  farms,  and 
ranches,  and  to  control 
the  movement  of  live 
stock? 


Are  State  offi- 
cials authorized 

to  issue  rules 
and  regulations 

"   &SBEL 
ing  quarantine 
lines? 


Are  such  officers 

empowered  to 
enforce  such  dis- 
infection of  ani- 


as  may  be  nec- 
essary ? 


Mar  the  State  con- 
fer authority 
upon  Federal 
represent  a  tives 
to  act  as  officials 
of  the  State  in 
such  matteis.' 


No  live-stock  quarantine  or  sanitary  law. 


Peaceofficers  may  enforce    No 
quarantine  lines  fixed 
by   law  and   by  the 
United  St; 

Yes 


Impliedly 


No 


Yes 


No  live-stock  quarantine  or  sanitary  law. 

Yes;  impliedly  so Yes Yes. 

No  law  to  cover  these  matters. 

Yes Yes |  Yes  . 

Y"es;  impliedly  so Yes |  Yes. 

No  live-stock  quarantine  or  sanitary  law. 


ri No No. 

North  Carolina Yes No. 


Oklahoma. 
South  Carolina  .. 

Tenne?>ee 

Texas  

Virginia 


Y'es. 

Yes. 
Yes . 

Yes  . 


Yes . 


No  law  to  cover  these  matters. 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 


No 
Yi  - 
Yes 


As  county  officials 
only. 

Not  prevented. 

Yes. 

N 

No. 
Yes. 

Yes. 


Y  - Not  prevented. 

Yes No. 

Yes Yes. 


30  I'JBOOK     .  DEPAJBTMEIST    OF   AGBICU1  _. 

The  matter  was  early  taken  up  with  the  proper  officials  in  th 

ere  made  fc: 

:■  work  has  been  dune  in 

ch  the  local  authorities,  who  were  permitted  to 

ies  or  localities  to  be  covered  and  :  immend 

for:.  _  the  Department  men  acquai:.  the 

loct  tive  local iti>  s. 

TL  in  which  it  " 

■ 
1.   Calif  or:, 
i'.   ": 

Kentucky.  Tenn-  >pi. 

:h  Carol: 
uia  and  2s~orth  Carolina. 
The  work  possible  -     ge  of  the 

in  July  before  it  could  be  begun  at  all.  and  even 
later  before  it  could  be  taken  up  in  some  s 

in  the  diffei  idely  divert 

the  plans   of  procedure   and   m  oyed   necess       y   varied 

itly.     In  son.  ere  held  at  w hi 

rockmen.  and  other  i. 
I  -  s*s  ended  to  be  largely  educa- 

an  opportu  -     te  autho: 

relief  an  ference  for  local  inspectors,  thus  developing 

an  enthusiasm  and  interest  that  can  only  come  from  a  c!  -onal 

identification  with  a:  of  this   - 

necessary  to  employ  inspectors  who  could  live  in  He  and  wield 

?o  like  a  cowboy.     These  men  worked  in  _  f  about  a  d> 

each  group  L  cook  an  I  >ing  outtit.     They  covered  their 

territory  system  roping  and  examining  wherever  found, 

and  informing  the  owners  of  infested  animals  of  the  most  pra- 
method  ol  ig  rid  of         1  .'  found  ad  to  buy  a 

carload  of  crudv  tm  (in  barrels)  for  use  in  the  treatment  of 

-ted  animals.     This  oil  was  distributed  and  used  uuder  the  imme- 
diate su]  partment  in 
States,  and  was  doubtless  the  means  of  doi  .  ould  have  been  done 
in  no  other  way.  as  the  crude  oil  is  difficult  to  obtain  in  small  quantities 

ion. 
ble  following  -        -  the  number  of  her :  :ed, 

the  number  of  cattle  inspected,  the  numkr  found  free  of  ticks,  and 
umber  found  to  be  infested — the  grand  total  of  :. 
ntaining  522,52  I  cattle. 


REFOET    OF    THE    SECRETARY. 


31 


'.',  1906. 


Inspections. 


Herds. 


Alabama 780 

Arkansas 1,62^ 

California 1,015 

\    I 4.474 

icky  a 4, 077 

Missouri 126 

North  Carolina 

Oklahoma 

Tennessee  t> 6, 317 

Texas ]        410 

Virginia 


' 


Free.      Infected.     Total. 


4 
6, 071 

3,000 


1,430 


07.  S60 
23, 204 
86, 682 


16.972 
15,840 


S 
4, 430 


Total 20,315       SOS,  044 


Number 
of 

counties. 


n.In  addition,  in  Kentucky  1,300  herds  and  0,004  cattle  were  reinspected. 
fcln  addition,  in  Tennessee  822  herds  and  4,174  cattle  were  reinspected. 

The  work  is  still  progressing  in  some  States,  but  vail  be  practically 
discontinued  about  December  1  on  account  of  the  lack  of  funds.  The 
outlook  for  next  season's  operations  in  the  different  infested  sections 
is  very  encouraging,  and  the  work  should  be  resumed  in  the  early 
spring. 

In  considering  the  work  done  and  the  results  attained  thus  far  it 
should  be  borne  in  mind  that  the  season  was  well  advanced  before  the  law 
was  passed,  and  that,  although  some  steps  were  taken  in  anticipation  of 
its  passage,  yet  the  actual  plans  and  organization  for  the  work  were 
late  in  formation.  It  should  also  be  remembered  that  the  amount 
appropriated  was  only  intended  to  be  used  to  inaugurate  the  work, 
and  yet,  as  set  forth  above,  employees  of  the  Department  have  inspected 
15  herds,  containing  522  529  cattle,  and  have,  in  connection  with 
local  authorities,  so  attended  to  their  disinfection  and  to  the  suoer- 
vision  thereof  that  forty  whole  counties  and  parts  of  eleven  other 
counties,  with  an  aggregate  area  of  almost  50,000  square  miles,  will 
probably  be  released  from  quarantine  before  the  end  of  this  fiscal  year. 
This  is  an  area  larger  than  that  of  the  entire  State  of  Virginia.  Plans 
are  laid  and  specific  work  is  outlined  for  resumption  in  the  early 
spring.  The  State  officers,  cattle  owners,  and  others  affected  are 
intensely  interested;  educational  work  will  be  carried  on,  and  there  is 
every  reason  to  believe  that,  with  proper  funds  at  the  disposal  of  the 
Department  next  season,  large  inroads  may  be  made  into  the  territory 
now  quarantined,  and  hundreds  of  thousands  of  cattle  be  given  an 
unrestricted  market,  thus  giving  direct  results  to  an  immense  number 
of  people.  This  will  stimulate  interest  in  those  States  in  which  active 
interest  is  now  lacking  and  will  doubtless  result  in  a  more  general 
movement  against  the  cattle  tick. 

If  the  Congress  at  its  n^xt  session  will  appropriate  $250,000  for 
extending  these    operations  and  will  continue  to  adequately  sustain 


YEARBOOK    C  7    Z  B  B    I  El  L.TUBS . 

them,  and  the  States  intei  I  part  in  th  f  enact- 

ravorable  law>  and  appropriating  money  to  b-  this  cooper- 

-  only  a  question  of  time  when  the  southern  cattle  tick 
in  this  country  will  be  a  thing  of  the  past. 

sc::  - 

The  scientific  inve-  .ontagious  di  y  the  Bureau  of 

Animal   Industry  hi  Lai   importance  with 

regard  to  tuberculosis  and  hog  cholera  during 

and  alarming  frequency  of  tuberculosis  in  hog- 
observed  in  the  mea~  luring  recent  years,  led  to 

experiments  to  determine  the  most  probable  source  of  infection  of 

animals.     The  practical  conclusions  of  res  ligations  are 

that  the  most  freque  -  of  tuberculosis  in  hogs  are  to  be  found 

in  the  common  practices  :  allowing  these  animals  to  follow  cattle  in 
the  f  eed  lot  and  of  f  eedir  _  immed  mill:  use. 

The  feces  of  tuberculous  cattle  have  been  found  to  be  heavily 
with  tubercle  bacilli.     The  expei  tals  with 

tuberculous  lungs,  while  rate  a:  up 

tuberculous  materia.  -  icilli  fr-  val- 

lowingthem.  having  them     issthi      gh  their  in!  .  and  discharging 

them  with  their  feces.  Hogsi  idily  contract  tubei  sis  from  eating 
the  excrement  of  tuberculous  cattle.  For  milk  to  be  infected  with 
tubercle  bacilli  it  is  not  nee  tat  the  udder  should  be 

infected  feces  are  believed  to  be  a  common  cause  of  contamination  of 
milk  drawn  in  the  environment  of  tuberculous  e 

-eased  cow  may  be  the  means  of  infecting  the  milk  of 
an  entire  herd. 

Other  experin:  location  of  lesions  in  the  bodies 

of  animals  affected  with  tubei      losis  .  ban- 

nel  of  infection.     For  ins!  -     as  in  the  lungs  have  usually  h 

tofore  been  regarded  as  ind:  \  acquired  by 

inhalation.     The  incorre  ahown  by  producing 

lun^  lis  iseby  inoculating  hogs  in  the  tip  of  the  tail  and  by  feeding 
them  with  tuberculo  v. 

-    tsemphasi  the  great  importance  of  ev  rmer 

keeping  his  herd  free  from  tuberculo - 

periments  in  the  application    :  the  tuberculin 

when  proper  precautions  are  taken  tuberculin  is  as  accu- 

in  detecting  tuberculosis  in  hogs  as  in  the  case  of  cattle.     The 
found  reliable  in  V7  rimental 

animals. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  33 


HOC    CHOLERA. 


Hog'  cholera  has  long-  been  a  cause  of  heav}^  loss  to  the  farmers,  and 
for  years  scientists  in  the  Department  and  in  various  parts  of  the 
world  have  been  working  on  the  problem  of  the  cause  and  prevention 
of  this  disease.  Recent  work  of  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  has 
demonstrated  that  the  contagion  consists  of  a  virus  which  exists  in  the 
blood  and  other  fluids  of  diseased  animals,  but  which  can  pass  through 
the  finest  filter,  is  invisible  under  the  microscope,  and  therefore  can  not 
be  isolated  or  discerned  by  any  of  the  usual  methods.  This  important 
discovery,  which  has  since  been  continued  by  eminent  scientific 
authorities  in  England  and  on  the  Continent  of  Europe,  affords  an 
explanation  of  the  failure  of  past  efforts  to  produce  a  satisfactory 
vaccine. 

The  real  cause  of  the  disease  having  at  last  been  determined,  the 
Bureau  has  during  the  past  season  conducted  experiments  with  a  view 
to  producing  a  vaccine  or  serum  which  will  prevent  or  cure  the  dis- 
ease. Successful  results  have  already  been  obtained  in  an  experimental 
way,  and  efforts  are  now  being  made  to  adapt  the  method  to  practical 
and  general  use.  The  method  has  been  patented  b}^  the  Department 
in  the  name  of  the  scientist  who  evolved  it,  Dr.  Marion  Dorset,  the 
patent  having  been  taken  out  in  such  a  manner  as  to  insure  to  all  the 
people  in  the  United  States  the  right  to  its  use  free  of  ro}Talty.. 


PARASITES    OF   SHEEP. 


The  stomach  worm  or  twisted  wireworm  of  sheep,  a  parasite  causing* 
great  damage  to  flocks  in  many  parts  of  the  United  States,  has  been 
studied,  and  the  principal  facts  in  its  life  history,  which  have  hitherto 
been  unknown,  have  been  worked  out.  The  eggs  of  the  parasite  are 
scattered  over  the  pastures  in  the  droppings  of  infested  sheep  or  cattle. 
The  embryos,  which  in  a  certain  stage  are  enveloped  in  a  sheath  which 
enables  them  to  withstand  freezing  and  dryness,  climb  up  blades  of 
grass.  When  infested  grass  is  eaten  by  a  sheep  the  embryos  continue 
their  development  in  that  animal.  Experiments  now  in  progress 
indicate  that  with  certain  precautions  it  is  entirely  feasible  to  raise 
lambs  free  from  this  and  some  other  troublesome  parasites. 

BLACKLEG    VACCINE. 

The  Department  has  continued  to  supply  blackleg  vaccine  free  of 
charge  to  stock  owners,  and  reports  indicate  that  the  prevalence  of 
this  disease  is  gradually  being  reduced.  During  the  year  1,350,915 
doses  of  this  vaccine  were  prepared  and  distributed.  The  losses 
among  animals  treated  with  this  vaccine  during  the  previous  year  wen- 
less  than  one-half  of  1  per  cent. 
3     a  1906 3 


34  YEARBOOK    OE    IflE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AfiEICULTUBE. 

l'El  .  [ATION8. 

After  consultation  with  officers  of  American  pedigree  record  r 
ciations,  the  Department  has  radically  changed  the  regulations 

the   importation    of   animals   for  breeding  purposes.     Hiti 
certificates  of  approved  domestic  and  ft  is  have  been 

accepted  with  the  requirement  that  they  should  show  the  a 
two  generations.     This  requirement  caused  inconvenience  and  d: 
isfaction  to  importers,  but  the  Department  felt  that  unl  >uld 

supervise  m  ery  the  books  of  record  such  a  requirement 

necessary  to  give  a  reasonable  assurance  of  pure  breeding.  The  new 
regulations  simply  require  that  animals  imported  for  bi  pur- 

poses shall  be  registered  in  an  approved  American  book  of  i 
order  to  be  entitled  to  free  entry.  Where  a  breed  has  no  book  of 
record  in  the  United  States  the  certificate  of  the  Chief  of  the  Bureau 
of  Animal  Industry  must  be  obtained.  The  records  of  the  approved 
associations  are  closely  supervised  by  the  Department  and  n. 
form  to  prescribed  conditions  in  order  to  remain  on  the  approved 
list.  This  change  should  prove  beneficial  to  the  breeding  industry. 
It  will  not  only  make  officers  more  careful  in  the  management  of  pedi- 
gree registers,  but  will  practically  compel  the  registration  of  imported 
pure-bred  animals  in  American  books. 

HORSE-BREEDINU    INVESTIGATION -. 

Satisfactory  progress  is  being  made  in  the  experiments  in  breeding 
heavy  harness  horses  at  the  Colorado  Experiment  Station.     The  stud 
has  been  increased  by  the  purchase  of  two  Kentucky  mares  of  c: 
able  strains  of  breeding.     It  i-  eo  I  advisable  to  increase  further 

the  number  of  experimental  animals,  and  the  Department  should  be 
prepared  to  pure!  -eptionally  good  ma:  ffers. 

line  of  experiments  promises  to  be  of  theg  )  Ameri- 

can stockmen  and  should  be  carried  out  systematically  and  thoroughly. 

Experiments  have  been  begun,  in  cooperation  with  the  Venn 
Experiment  .  in  breeding  Morgan  horses  with  the  object  of 

preventing  the  loss  of  the  Morgan  blood,  pi^erving  the  type,  and 
increasing  the  size.  Seven  mares  and  two  fillies  were  purchased  in 
Vermont  and  two  mares  in  Kentucky  for  these  experiments. 

FECUNDITY    OT 

Some  unexpected  but  instructive  results  were  obtained  by  a  study 
of  the  fecundity  of  Poland-China  sows.     It  had  been  supp* 
this  breed  of  hog  declining  in  fecundity,  and  the  ment 

.   d  to  undertake  experiments  with  a  view  to  ovcrcon. 
tendency.     An  investigation  into  the  pedigree  re 
son  of  two  periods  of  years,  based  upon  nearly  55,000  litter-,  showed 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  35 

that  the  average  number  of  pigs  per  litter  was  7.04  during  the  years 
1882-1886,  and  7.52  during  1898-1902.  There  was  thus  an  increase  of 
0.48  per  litter  instead  of  a  decrease.  These  results  led  to  a  similar 
investigation  of  the  Duroe-Jersey  breed,  and  while  the  popular  sup- 
position that  this  breed  is  more  prolific  than  the  Poland-China 
confirmed,  it  appeared  that  the  average  size  of  litters  of  Duroc-Jer 
had  remained  practically  stationary  for  several  years,  the  figures  being 
9.22  for  1893-1897  and  9.27  for  1898-1902.  These  investigations  are 
being  followed  with  studies  of  the  inheritance  of  fecundity. 

POULTRY    BREEDING. 

Investigations,  with  a  view  to  developing  a  strain  of  chickens  with 
increased  egg-laying  capacity,  are  being*  conducted  in  cooperation  with 
the  Maine  Experiment  Station.  Several  hens  have  been  found  to  lay 
more  than  200  eggs  in  one  year,  and  the  results  seem  to  indicate  that 
by  selecting  the  best  layers  for  breeding  purposes  and  by  proper 
feeding  the  average  egg  yield  of  a  flock  can  be  increased.  The  great 
benefit  of  such  an  increase  is  too  obvious  to  require  comment. 

EXPERIMENTS    IN    ANIMAL    NUTRITION. 

A  careful  scientific  study  of  the  fundamental  principles  of  animal 
nutrition  by  means  of  a  respiration  calorimeter  has  been  in  progress 
for  several  years  at  the  Pennsylvania  Experiment  Station  by  coopera- 
tion between  the  Department  and  that  station,  and  some  important 
and  valuable  results  have  been  realized.  Beginning  with  the  food  as 
a  source  of  energy  to  the  animal  machine,  the  investigators  follow  this 
energy  through  to  its  ultimate  effect,  determining  how  much  escapes  in 
the  undigested  residues  of  the  food,  how  much  is  expended  in  the 
digestion  and  assimilation  of  the  food,  and  what  surplus  remains  tc 
tain  the  life  of  the  animal  or  to  enable  it  to  produce  meat,  milk,  or  work. 

The  results  thus  far  published  include  experiments  with  timothy 
hay,  red  clover  hay,  and  corn  meal,  and  they  have  shown  that  the  so- 
called  "fuel  value"  of  feeding  stuffs  can  not  be  taken  as  a  measure  of 
their  nutritive  value.  The  experiments  have  amply  demonstrs 
that  the  real  nutritive  values  of  stock  feeds  are  much  less  than  their 
fuel  values,  the  former  ranging  from  56  to  07  per  cent  of  the  latter  in 
the  particular  feeds  used.  Experiments  to  study  the  effect  of  age  and 
breed  upon  the  percentage  of  food  energy  utilized  have  not  been 
concluded. 

FEEDING    COTTON-SEED    PRODUCTS   TO    HOGS. 

The  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  has  conducted  experiments  during 
the  year  to  test  the  harmful  properties  of  cotton  seed  and  cotton-seed 
meal  when  fed  to  hogs.  These  substances  proved  fatal  to  the  hogs, 
the  time  required  to  cause  death  being  longer  when  a  varied  ration  was 


36      YEARBOOK  ■  DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE. 

fed  "  n jDnly  one  kind  of  grain  was  fed  in  addition  to  the  cotton- 

seed meal.  lined  by  experiment  stations  as  to  the 

jed  products  in  combination  with  corn  meal 
were  confirmed,  bat  it  from  the  Department's  experiments 

that  bran  and  middlings,  instead  of  neutralizing  the  injurious  effect  of 
the  id  been  concluded  from  experiment  station  work, 

gave  very  little  better  than  corn  meal.     The  experiments  with 

bran  and  middlings  will  be  repeated  and  otlr  :iade.     Chemical 

and  pathological  -  are  being  made  with  a  view  to  discovering  the 

"larmful  effects  of  cotton  seed  when  fed  to  h< 

THE    DAIEY    INDUSTRY. 

>rk  of  the  Dairy  Division  of  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Indu>tiy 
.  ably  extended  during  the  year.     Results  of  a  valuable 
and  1  nature  to  the  dairy  industry  have  been  obtained  from 

inve  .  the  manufacture  and  storage  of  butter  and  cheese 

and  the  production  and  delivery  of  market  milk:  and  a  good  begin- 
ning .  -  n  made  in  .  k  for  the  improvement  and  develop- 
ment of  dairying  in  the  South  and  the  investigations  and  studies 
action  of  dairy  buildings  and  the  organization  and 
management  of  dairy  enterpi  i 

BriTEE  ixvestigat: 

at  5,  inds     :  butter  were  made  under  different  conditions 

and  stored  for  eight  months  at  different  temperatures.     The  conclu- 
91  experiment  is  that  the  use  of  cream  received  at  the 

.lition.  light  salting  of  the  butter,  and   low 

temperatures  (10°  F.  below  zero  to  10°  F.  above  zero)  give  much  the 

suits  for  storage  butt 

o  common  troubles  of  butter  makers — mold  in  butter  tubs  and  the 

or  of  butter — have  been  studied.     The  coating  of  tubs  with 

d  found  to  be  an  effective  method  of  preventing  mold. 

Investigation         2     ling  the  fishy  flavor    have  not   progressed    far 

enough  to  deterr.  cause  of  this  trouble  and  are  being  continued. 

A  -ystem  of  market  inspection  of  butter  at  New  York  and  Chicago 

th  a  view  to  assisting  cream'".     -  *     improve  the 

quality  of  their  product.     When  butter  arriving  at  one  of  these  mar- 

>und  deficient  in  quality  a  statement  of  its  condition  is  sent  to 

■utter  m  aler  who  purchases  the  butter,  and  to  the 

dairy  and  food  commissioner  of   the  State  in  which  the  butter  was 

produced. 

Further  work  was  done  during  the  year  in  the  manufacture  and 
leese.     A  quantity  of  American  Cheddar  style  cheese  was 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  37 

made,  cured,  and  stored  under  varying  conditions,  and  the  details  of 
the  experiments,  with  a  review  of  previous  work  on  the  subject,  were 
published.  The  cheese  that  scored  highest  was  that  placed  in  storage 
at  32°  F.  directly  from  the  press,  while  that  scoring  lowest  was  cured 
entirely  in  the  factory  curing-room  at  about  G5°  F.  Cold  curing 
appears  to  derive  its  value  chiefly  from  its  effect  on  what  otherwise 
might  be  poor  cheese.  The  popular  taste  is  growing  decidedly  toward 
mild  cheese,  and  to  meet  this  demand  it  seems  'desirable. to  have  cheese 
ripened,  so  far  as  it  is  ripened  at  all,  at  low  temperatures. 

The  experiments  in  the  manufacture  of  soft  cheese  of  leading  Euro- 
pean varieties  have  been  continued  throughout  the  year  in  cooperation 
with  the  Storrs  (Conn.)  Experiment  Station.  During  the  winter  a 
scientist  connected  with  this  work  spent  two  months  in  Europe  study- 
ing the  manufacture  of  cheese,  and  these  studies  have  resulted  in 
marked  progress  in  our  investigations  regarding  Camembcrt  and 
Roquefort  cheese.  While  there  are  some  problems  yet  to  be  investi- 
gated, the  knowledge  so  far  gained  of  the  fungi,  methods,  and  condi- 
tions necessary  in  the  production  of  these  kinds  of  cheese  indicates 
that  it  is  entirely  practicable  to  manufacture  in  this  country  soft 
cheeses  of  these  types  fully  equal  to  the  best  European  product. 

THE    PRODUCTION    AND    HANDLING    OF    MILK. 

Probably  no  article  of  food  is  more  generally  consumed  than  milk, 
and  in  striving  for  pure  foods  a  wholesome  milk  supply  must  be  con-^ 
sidered  of  prime  importance.     During  the  year  the  Dairy  Division x 
has  investigated  the  milk  supplies  of  various  cities,  and  has  begun 
studies  of  the  organization  and  working  of  milk  sanitary  commissions 
and  other  bodies  whose  object  is  to  improve  the  quality  of  market 

milk.  .  . 

The  competitive  exhibit  of  milk  and  cream  at  the  National  Dairy 
Show  in  Chicago  in  February  was  in  charge  of  the  Dairy  Division 
and  gave  an  object  lesson  of  great  educational  value.  It  was  demon- 
strated that  milk  and  cream  produced  under  sanitary  conditions  could 
be  shipped  long  distances  and  kept  sweet  for  several  weeks  without 
any  other  means  of  preservation  than  cleanliness  and  low  temperatures. 

DAIRY    IMPROVEMENT    IN    THE    ,«OUTH. 

A  careful  survey  of  dairy  conditions  in  the  South  has  been  made  as 
the  first  step  in  the  work  of  improving  these  conditions  and  promoting 
the  dairy  interests  of  that  section.  This  preliminary  work  has  shown 
that  while  in  some  cases  southern  dairy  herds  are  yielding  as  good 
results  as  are  ordinarily  expected  in  any  part  of  the  country,  there  is 
great  need  throughout  the  South  for  education  in  improved  methods  of 
dairy  breeding  and  feeding  and  milk  production.  Many  of  the  south- 
ern people  show  a  desire  to  learn  more  of  dairying  so  as  to  get  away 


38  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

from  the  one-crop  system.     One  serious  handicap  is  the  inferior  class 

of  cattle  found  there,  probably  due  largely  to  the  presence  of  the  cattle 

tick. 

other  dairy  woek. 

To  meet  the  demand  for  information  and  assistance  as  to  the  con- 
struction of  dairy  buildings,  some  studies  and  experiments  have  been 
and  are  being  made.  A  circular  giving  plans  for  an  improved  dairy 
barn  was  published,  and  many  plans  for  daily  buildings  of  various 
kinds  have  been  worked  out  and  sent  to  farmers  throughout  the  country. 
Some  experiments  have  been  made  in  building  silos  of  three  types  of 
construction. 

Investigation-;  into  the  organization,  equipment,  and  management  of 
creameries  and  cheese  factories  have  been  undertaken  to  enable  the 
Department  to  give  advice  and  assistance  on  these  subjects. 


RENOVATED    BUTTER. 


In  the  administration  of  the  portion  of  the  law  of  May  9,  1902, 
which  relates  to  renovated  butter,  the  Department  has  continued  its 
supervision  of  the  manufacture  and  sale  of  this  article.  The  factories 
and  ingredients  are  inspected  to  insure  sanitary  conditions  and  whole- 
someness,  and  the  product  is  inspected  in  the  markets  with  a  view  to 
detecting  and  preventing  violations  of  the  law  and  regulations  as  to 
proper  labeling.  The  factories  are  in  better  sanitary  condition  than 
in  past  years,  and  as  a  rule  the  manufacturers  show  a  disposition  to 
comply  with  the  law  and  regulations.  Evidence  of  the  illegal  sale  of 
renovated  butter  by  dealers  in  several  cities  has  been  collected,  how- 
ever, and  some  prosecutions  have  been  instituted.  The  regulations  of 
the  Department  have  been  sustained  in  two  court  decisions. 

BUREAU  OF  PLANT  INDUSTRY. 

A  leading  feature  of  the  work  of  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  dur- 
ing the  past  year  has  been  the  cooperative  demonstration  work  with 
farmers,  fruit  growers,  and  others.  It  has  been  my  established  policy 
to  have  our  own  officers  carefully  scrutinize  all  operations,  including 
those  which  involve  the  conducting  of  business  as  well  as  those  in 
which  both  field  and  scientific  investigations  are  concerned. 

INTRODUCING    NEW    CROrS   AND    NEW   INDUSTRIES. 

The  search  by  agricultural  explorers  in  foreign  lands  for  new  crops 
has  been  continued.  A  trained  man  has  spent  the  last  year  in  the  cul- 
tivated fields  and  wild  mountains  of  north  China  and  Manchuria 
searching  tor  new  plants  and  seeds  worthy  to  be  transplanted  to  this 
country  and  for  wild  forms  of  our  cultivated  fruits  and  vegetables 
which  mav  have  characters  of  hardiness  or  unusual  vigor  that  will 


REPORT    OF   THE    SECRETARY.  39 

make  them  useful  for  the  plant  breeders  of  the  United  States.  Ship- 
ments of  scions  and  of  seeds  representing  hundreds  of  interesting- 
things  have  been  sent  in  and  arc  now  growing  in  the  trial  gardens  of 
the  Department.  Among  the  things  secured  are  new  hard}'  Pekin 
persimmon  varieties,  interesting  varieties  of  the  English  walnut,  the 
Chinese  pistaehe.  wild  and  cultivated  apricots,  the  wild  peach  from  its 
supposed  original  home,  hardy  apples  and  edible-fruited  hawthorns, 
millets  and  field  beans,  a  lawn  sedge  that  is  promising,  and  a  very 
remarkable  lot  of  Chinese  grape  varieties,  not  to  mention  a  most 
unusually  interesting  collection  of  ornamental  trees  and  shrubs  suited 
to  the  climate  of  the  Eastern  and  Middle  States. 

New  alfalfas  and  other  ckofs. — One  of  the  most  important  achieve- 
ments of  the  Bureau's  exploration  work  is  the  recent  discovery  by  Prof. 
X.  E.  Hansen,  of  the  South  Dakota  Agricultural  Experiment  Station, 
who  is  now  abroad  in  the  interest  of  the  Department,  of  the  existence  of 
a  Siberian  alfalfa,  an  excellent  forage  plant  with  yellow  instead  of  the 
usual  blue  flowers.  This  plant  is  native  on  the  dry  steppes  of  Siberia, 
where  the  mercury  sometimes  freezes  without  snow,  thus  proving  the 
ability  of  the  plant  to  withstand  with  no  protection  a  temperature  of 
about  40  degrees  below  zero.  The  existence  of  this  alfalfa  has  been 
suspected  for  many  years,  and  its  final  discover}',  it  is  believed,  may 
mark  an  epoch  in  the  agriculture  of  the  northwestern  prairie  regions 
of  the  United  States,  where  the  rainfall  is  slight  and  the  winters  are 
exceedingly  cold.  Professor  Hansen  is  making  a  very  careful  study  of 
this  plant,  with  a  view  to  its  cultivation  in  this  country.  A  quantity  of 
the  seed  of  this  valuable  crop  has  been  secured,  which  will  be  given  a 
thorough  trial  by  the  Department  at  an  early  date.  It  will  supplement 
durum  wheat  in  a  rotative  system  and  avoid  the  necessity  of  summer 
fallowing. 

The  most  distinct  of  any  of  the  alfalfas  is  the  newly  introduced 
Arabian,  characterized  by  its  large  leaflets,  hairiness,  and  vigorous 
growth.  Its  quick  recovery  after  cutting  renders  an  extra  cutting 
possible  in  long  seasons.  It  is  proving  of  special  value  in  the  irrigated 
sections  of  California  and  the  Southwest,  though  its  lack  of  hardiness 
makes  it  unsuited  to  the  colder  parts  of  the  country.  Attempts  are 
under  way  to  establish  strains  resistant  to  cold  and  drought. 

A  species  of  vetch  called  the  Tangier  pea  has  proved  superior  to  all 
others  in  California  in  its  luxuriance  of  growth,  having  yielded  as 
high  as  9  tons  of  green  feed  per  acre.  On  account  of  this  great 
amount  of  herbage  it  chokes  out  weeds  very  effectually.  As  a  green 
manure  crop  it  promises  in  California  to  supercede  all  others.  Its 
value  as  forage  remains  to  be  ascertained.  A  large  quantity  of  seed 
is  being  grown  so  as  to  introduce  it  extensively  next  season. 

A  most  luxuriant  subtropical  grass,  called  the  Parti  grass,  has  proved 
well  adapted  to  the  Gulf  coast  region,  Arizona,  and  California.     Where 


J    AGBICULTUBE. 

sufficient  m  provided  tL     g  hay 

per  acre.     I:  in  quality,  but  very  nutritk  seed  is 

very  poor  in  quality,  but  the  grass  can  readily  be  grown  from 

e  plant  covering  -  or  rno: 

planned  to  distribute  the  cur      a  spring  ol 

Encourage  i      jstbt. — The  Unite 

every  year  larger  and  larger  quantities  of  hand-made  floor  coverings 
made  from  several  -  f  aquatic  rj  sedges  _  row 

pretty  generally  over  the  world.     In  re  than  ."    .  ads 

were  imported,  and  more  than  $4,  twith- 

Hng  the  fact  that  looms  have  been  invented  that  can  weave  the 
rushes  into  useful  floor  mats.     These  loom-  merican 

miry,  when  tended  by  single  o|  .  can  turn  out 

ards  of  matting  a  day — a  strong  com  ~he  hand  looms  in 

in  foreign  countries  from  which  we  draw  our  -  of  matting. 

The  common  rushes  of  our  neglected  swamp  lands  and  tidal  regions 
can  be  made  into  m  :  the  deli  rac- 

ter  of  the  cultivated  forms  in  use  in  the  Orient.  India,  and  Africa. 
Our  explorers  have  been  gathering  living  plants  of  the  best  for 

selecting  the  m  pes   for 

trial  plantings  in  the  abandoned  rice  plantations  arolinas  and 

for  the  delta  regions  of  the  Mississ  rrande,  where  cheap 

lands,  which  are  not  now  growing  profit;.  "airing  for  a 

new  plant  culture. 

UTROPic  .7. — The  Florida  fru'"    \         sra  have  had 

their  enthusiasm  aroused  this  year  by  the  ripening  of  several  of  the 
delicious,  fiberl—  Indian  mangoes  which  artment  has 

introduced.     The  collection  is  one  of  the  1  the  world,  and 

Florida  growers  are  waiting  to  s      the  behavior  of  the  differ' 
now  under  trial  before  planting  larg-  fruit,  without  doubt 

one  of  the  great  fruits  of  the  world. 

.TE  cultuek — The     late    palms  introduced  by  the 
Department  into  southern  California  and  A  hun- 

dreds of  pounds  of  delicious  fruit  this  year.     Even  the  famous  Deglet 
Noor  from  the  Sahara  has  ripened  p«: 

proving  that  this  unique  ilture  1  the  stage  of  a 

p>ure  experiment  into  that  of  a  n- 

he  net. — The  inve-    gal  a  prorni- 

dry-land  nut  crop.  L  -d  in  a  distinct  widening  of  :.  -'  >ili- 

rough  the  introduction  from  Tori  f  hardy 

forms.     Three  wild  spe«  :j  introduced 

from  the  dr:  of  the  Old  World,  and  a  very  hardy  stock  has 

ired  in  northern  China. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  41 

INVESTIGATIONS    BY    THE    PATHOLOGIS 

•  The  year  has  been  an  unusual  one  in  the  field  of  plant  pathology. 
There  have  been  serious  outbreaks  of  disease  and  the  staff  of  men 
engaged  in  this  work  has  been  kept  very  busy. 

Pear  blight. — The  Department  has  worked  out  by  careful  bacte- 
riological investigation  methods  of  controlling-  this  serious  menace  to 
the  pear  and  apple  industry.  The  disastrous  attacks  of  the  old  eastern 
pear  blight  upon  the  magnificent  pear  orchards  of  California  have 
brought  into  prominence,  the  importance  of  this  work.  During  the 
past  six  years  the  Department  has  been  engaged  in  demonstrating  on 
a  small  scale  in  certain  isolated  orchards  the  practicability  of  control- 
ling the  disease,  mainly  by  the  eradication  of  the  blighted  portions  of 
the  tree  and  the  antiseptic  treatment  of  the  wounds.  Strenuous 
efforts  are  being  made  by  the  Department,  in  cooperation  with  the 
State  experiment  station  and  the  State  and  county  horticultural  com- 
missioners of  California,  to  assist  in  applying  these  methods  in  saving 
the  California  orchards.  The  pear  orchards  of  California  represent  a 
valuation  of  about  Sl5.Gtio.oon.  producing  an  average  annual  income 
to  the  fruit  growers  of  $1,500,000.  One-third  of  this,  at  least,  has 
already  been  destroyed,  but  we  hope  to  help  the  growers  to  save  the 
remainder.  Pear  blight  is  destroying  the  pear  industry  in  several 
other  western  States,  and  urgent  requests  have  been  made  for  assist- 
ance, which  the  Department  expects  to  grant  as  far  as  it  is  able. 

Littll:  peach  and  peach  yellows. — The  little  peach  disease  has 
now  been  kept  under  control  for  three  years  on  the  test  area  in 
Michigan,  and  it  is  believed  that  the  efficacy  of  the  method  has  been 
fully  demonstrated  there.  Work  has  therefore  been  transferred  to  a 
similar  demonstration,  in  cooperation  with  the  Cornell  Experiment 
Station,  in  a  test  area  in  Niagara  County,  X.  Y.  This  is  confidently 
expected  to  show  the  possibility  of  greatly  reducing  the  ravages  of 
the  little  peach  disease  and  also  of  the  peach  yellows. 

Peach  yellows  has  been  unusually  destructive  in  West  Virginia  and 
Maryland  during  the  past  season.  Department  experts  have  been 
studying  the  disease  in  cooperation  with  the  West  Virginia  State 
Experiment  Station  and  urging  the  application  of  eradication  methods. 
In  one  district,  at  least,  in  West  Virginia,  fully  90  per  cent  of  the 
peach  trees  have  been  destroyed  by  the  yellows  during  the  past  three 
years,  and  mainly  during  the  present  season, 

Apple  bitter  rot  in  the  Ozark  Mountain  region. — Last  sea- 
son's successful  spraying  experiments  in  Virginia  demonstrated  for 
the  first  time  the  possibility  of  controlling  bitter  rot  of  the  apple  on 
the  Yellow  Newtown  variety  and  indicated  the  exact  dates  of  treat- 
ment. This  work  has  now  been  transferred  to  the  Ozark  districts  of 
Missouri  and  Arkansas.     Here  it  has  been   tested  on  a  much   larger 


42  YE  \RB00K    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

scale  and  on  different  varieties  of  apples.  The  results  fully  corrobo- 
rate last  year's  conclusions  and  have  demonstrated  the  entire  feasi- 
bility of  practically  complete  control  of  this  serious  orchard  disease. 
Some  minor  rots  and  defects  of  the  apple  have  also  been  more  com- 
pletely brought  under  control  as  a  result  of  this  treatment. 

Gumming  fungus  ok  shot-hole  fungus  of  the  teach. — The 
gumming  fungus  or  shot-hole  fungns  has  been  increasing  in  California 
i  alarming  rate  during-  the  last  five  or  .six  years  and  has  resulted 
in  very  severe  losses  to  the  peach  growers  of  that  State.  It  threatens 
the  destruction  of  the  peach  industry  of  the  Sacramento  and  San 
uin  valleys.  A  treatment  was  suggested,  after  proper  study  by 
Department  officials,  which  has  been  wholly  successful. 

Wllt-besistant  melons. — Wilt  has  nearly  destroyed  the  water- 
melon industry  in  many  sections  of  the  South.  All  known  varieties  of 
melons  Lave  been  tested,  but  none  resistant  to  the  disease  was  found. 
It  was  found,  however,  that  the  citron  is  resistant,  and  the  Depart- 
ment undertook  by  hybridization  to  breed  this  quality  into  the  melon. 
The  result  lias  been  successful,  and  there  has  been  secured  and  fixed  a 
variety  of  melon  very  resistant  to  wilt — a  heavy  yielder,  of  excellent 
quality,  and  well  adapted  to  shipping.  Next  season  it  will  lie  propa- 
gated for  distribution. 

Wilt-resistant  cottox. — The  wilt-resistant  selections  of  Sea 
Island  cottons  are  now  regularly  used  in  the  infected  soils  in  the  Sea 
Island  districts  of  South  Carolina.  The  loss  from  wilt  has  thus 
been  practically  eliminated  in  the  principal  region  in  which  this 
special  cotton  is  grown.  The  disease  is  still  causing  much  loss  in  the 
interior  districts,  where  this  variety  of  cotton  is  grown,  owing  to  the 
fact  that  many  of  the  growers  do  not  appreciate  the  value  of  resistant 
seed.  Demonstration  tests,  however,  are  rapidly  convincing  them. 
Excellent  wilt-resistant  selections  of  Upland  varieties  have  also  been 
secured.  Seed  will  be  distributed  this  year  to  cooperators  and  propa- 
gated next  year  for  more  general  distribution. 

Disease-resistant  potatoes. — For  several  years  this  Department 
has  been  testing  various  American  and  European  varieties  of  potatoes, 
especially  for  disease  resistance,  and  has  now  secured  several  good 
varieties  resistant  to  both  the  early  and  late  blight,  as  well  as  to  tip- 
burn  and  Ilea  beetles.  The  work  is  carried  on  principally  in  coopera- 
tion with  the  Vermont  Experiment  Station,  though  several  other 
Stutes  are  also  cooperating. 

PROGRESS    IX    CEEEAL   WORK. 

Extension  of  the  winter  wheat  area. — About  four  years  ago 
the  Department  began  a  .systematic  distribution  of  the  Kharkof  wheat, 
and  extensive  trials  of  this  variety  in  cooperation  with  the  State  experi- 
ment stations.     It  is  the  hardiest  winter  wheat  vet  grown   in  this 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECEETABY.  43 

country,  and  is  now  thoroughly  established.  By  its  use  the  area  in  which 
winter  wheat  can  be  successfully  cultivated  has  been  much  extended 
to  the  northward  and  westward,  particularly  in  Nebraska  and  Iowa, 

while  8  considerable  amount  is  now  grown  in  South  Dakota  and 
southern  Minnesota.  It  will  be  conservative  to  state  that  wherever 
this  wheat  has  been  introduced  the  yield  per  acre  is  being  increased 
on  an  average  of  5  bushels. 

tablishmext  of   wiXTER   barley. — Much    attention    has    I 
given  this  year  to  the  introduction  and  development  of  winter  varieties 
of  barley.     It  is  well  known  that  fall-sown  grain  will  yield  much  more 
on  the  same  ground   than   spring-sown  grain,  in  addition  to  the  fact 
that  winter  grain  is  almost  always  or  uaiity.     Excepting  some 

Southern  States,  winter  barley  has  heretofore  been  practically  un- 
known in  this  country.  After  three  3Tears  of  demonstration  work, 
the  Tennessee  Winter  barley  is  now  well  established  in  Kansas,  Okla- 
homa, and  southern  Nebraska,  in  addition  to  a  few  successful  trials 
that  have  been  made  in  the  North  Central  States.  The  results  of  the 
introduction  of  this  barley  are  remarkable  and  very  interesting. 
Wherever  it  has  been  grown  it  is  now  often  yielding  50  per  cent  more 
to  the  acre  than  the  ordinary  spring  barley.  Besides,  it  has  the  advan- 
tage of  giving  much  winter  pasturage  in  seasons  that  are  favorable  for 
pasturing. 

The  unusual  success  of  some  of  our  introduced  Swedish  and  Aus- 
trian pedigreed  barleys  is  opening  up  the  great  possibilities  of  pure 
strains  of  this  cereal,  especially  for  malting  purposes. 

Durum  wheat. — In  the  field  work  on  durum  wheat  all  efforts  are 
now  being-  concentrated  on  its  improvement,  particularly  in  the  devel- 
opment first  of  pure  types.  Much  help  is  being  given  in  the  investi- 
gations of  this  wheat  by  the  experiment  stations,  particularly  those  of 
North  Dakota,  South  Dakota,  and  Colorado.  It  is  so  well  demon- 
strated that  the  Kubanka  variety  is  the  best,  considering  all  qualities,  for 
the  northern  districts  that  farmers  everywhere  throughout  the  North 
are  urged  to  sow  only  this  type.  A  number  of  experiments,  including 
baking  tests,  all  of  which  have  been  published,  have  proved  conclu- 
sively that  it  i>  equal  to  the  best  No.  1  hard  spring  wheat  for  making 
bread.  The  results  in  the  sale  of  this  wheat  during  the  last  season 
and  so  far  this  season  have  been  favorable  far  be\'ond  expectation. 
Last  year  about  10,-  bushels  were  exported  to  foreign  coun- 

tries, and  the  price  on  an  export  basis  at  New  York  City  and  on  the 
Canadian  border  was  at  several  times  equal  to  that  of  the  hard  spring 
wheat.  Probably  at  least  20,000,000  bushels  were  produced  in  1905, 
which,  after  making  ample  allowance  for  seed,  leaves  several  million 
bushels  that  must  have  been  used  for  bread  in  this  country.  A  good 
portion  of  this  was  used  in  Minneapolis.     For  the  crop  this  year  a 


44  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTYIEN  I  RICULTUKE. 

safe  estimate  would  ibout  50,  bushels,  oi  ximately 

one-twelfth  of  the  usual  wheat  crop  of  this  country. 

From  the  daily  and  weekly  reports  received  from  the  markets 
appears  that  about  12,        .         bushels     :  this     rop  have  so  far  been 
sold  for  export.     This  -         n,  at  New  York  City,  durum  wheat  i« 
far  selling  uniformly  at  5  or  6  cei  -  than  the  s  :  Mani- 

toba hard.  The  increasing  export  demand  from  dealers  who  know 
how  to  judge  this  class  of  wheat  ought  to  ; 

value  to  American  manufacturers,  and  it  is  hoped  that  in  the  future 
our  home  consumption  will  increase  much  more  rapidly. 

Sixty  Day  oat. — In  previous  reports  attention  has  ailed  to 

the  superiority  of  the  introduced  Swedisl  fcand- 

ard  varieties  throughout  the  Northern  States.     Duiii  .  same  time 

another  variety  of  oats  has  been  introduced  from  Russia,  known  as  the 
Sixty  Day.  but  which  matures,  however,  in  a  little  over  ninety  ins 
of  sixty  days.      It  is  so  much  earlier  than  other  varieties  that  it  often 
escapes  many  fungous  and  insect  pests  that  attack  other  well 

as  the  effects  of  severe  periods  of  drought.     It  is  very  prolific 
rule,  and  has  an  unusually  wide  adaptatioi  ally. 

Amarillo  testing  farm. — The  testing  farm  at  Amarillo.  Tex., 
been  in  operation  one  year,  and  the  fall  seeding  of  the  second  year  is 
now  finished.  The  operations  here  are  to  a  large  extent  in  the  nature 
of  pioneer  work  to  demonstrate  to  the  inhabitants  of  the  large  area  of 
the  Panhandle  of  Texas  that  agriculture  can  actually  be  conducted  in 
that  region.  The  experiments  were  conducted  previously  at  Chan- 
ning.  Tex.  That  much  success  has  been  attained  in  this  work  is  indi- 
cated in  the  many  crops  that  have  been  successfully  grown  throughout 
that  territory  during  the  last  year,  the  farmers  having  been  induced  to 
sow  these  crops  largely  through  the  influence  of  these  inv<  •     _ 

Investigations  in  California  and  the  Southwest. — Experim 
for  the  purpose  of  improving  the  quality  of  wheat  in  California  have 
been  conducted  for  two  years  at  M       si  a  City,  Cal.     In 

addition,  seed  of  some  of  the  most  promising  varieties  of  wheat  used 
in  these  experiments  has  been  furnished  in  cooperative  trials  with 
farmers   in  othei  of  the  Southwest.     From  the  results  of  the 

work  so  far  it  is  evident  that  at  least  two  of  these  new  wheats  are  very 
well  adapted  to  the  southwestern  United  States  and  are  at  the  same 
time  good  milling  wh 

Chemical  and  baking  tests  of  flour  and  grain. — In  eooperal 
with  the  Bureau  of  Chemistry  many  chemical  anal  I  other  I   sts 

been  made  of  introduced  grains,  particularly  oats  and  bar: 
to  determine  their  feeding  value.     An  important  piece  of  work  has 
been   the  investigations   of  the   comparative    value  of    durum-w 
Hour  for  bread  making  conducted  for  this  Department  by  the  Colum- 
bus Laboratories  uf  Chicago. 


EEP0ET    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  45 

A  study  of  wheat  deterioration. — During  the  year  a  special 
investigation,  also  in  cooperation  with  the  Bureau  of  Chemistry,  has 
been  made  to  determine  the  causes  of  the  deterioration  of  wheat  from 
the  milling  standpoint.  An  important  clue  to  the  solution  of  this 
problem  has  been  discovered,  and  when  the  matter  is  full}-  worked  out 
it  will,  without  doubt,  enable  the  farmer  to  prevent  the  production  of 
soft  and  light-colored  grains  that  are  much  inferior  in  quality. 

Rice  investigations. — A  series  of  experiments  for  the  thorough  study 
of  rice,  its  varieties,  methods  of  handling,  irrigation,  etc.,  has  been 
inaugurated  in  cooperation  with  the  Louisiana  Agricultural  Experi- 
ment Station.  Crowley,  La.,  having  been  selected  as  the  place  of  oper- 
ations More  than  300  distinct  varieties  of  rice  are  under  experiment. 
The'results  of  this  season  already  show  that  a  good  beginning  has  been 
made  in  this  work. 

grain  staxdaedizatiox. 

From  time  to  time  during  the  past  rive  years  demands  have  been 
made  upon  the  Department  for  aid  in  the  grading  and  handling  of 
grain.  It  has  been  fully  recognized  that  this  is  a  matter  which 
demands  most  careful  investigation,  as  both  our  home  and  foreign 
markets  are  involved.  Grain  grading  as  now  practiced  by  the  various 
State  and  other  organized  bodies  has  not  been  satisfactory,  chiefly  on 
account  of  the  lack  of  uniformity.  The  Department  has  consistently 
held  the  ground  that  some  system  of  standardization  is  absolutely  nec- 
essary as  a  first  step  toward  securing  uniform  methods  of  grain  grad- 
ing. With  a  view  to  eventually  bringing  about  this  standardization, 
Congress  at  its  last  session  authorized  the  establishment  of  laboratories 
for  the  purpose  of  examining  and  reporting  upon  the  nature,  quality, 
and  condition  of  any  sample,  parcel,  or  consignment  of  seed  or  grain 
entering  into  interstate  or  foreign  commerce.  After  a  careful  study 
of  the  situation,  two  laboratories,  all  the  funds  at  hand  would  permit, 
have  been  established — one  at  Baltimore,  Md.,  the  other  at  New 
Orleans,  La.  At  both  places  the  Department  has  received  the  cordial 
cooperation  of  the  chambers  of  commerce,  and  is  now  about  to  enter 
upon  the  regular  duties  connected  with  the  laboratories. 

It  will  be  the  object  of  these  laboratories  to  make  a  thorough  study  of 
present  systems  of  grain  grading  with  a  view  to  reaching,  if  practica- 
ble, conclusions  which  will  make  standardization  possible.  It  is  rec- 
ognized that  much  preliminary  work  must  be  clone,  and,  furthermore, 
that  special  apparatus  will  have  to  be  devised  for  quickly  determining 
the  moisture  content  of  grain,  and  for  conducting  other  observations 
and  investigations.  A  moisture-determining  apparatus  has  already 
been  devised  and  is  now  in  use  at  our  laboratories.  It  is  believed  that 
improvements  can  be  made  in  these  devices  and  the  Department's 
officers  are  already  at  work  on  this  problem. 


TEAEBOOK    OF   THE   DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

:ognizing  the  need  for  the  closest  relations  with  the  grain  trade, 
the  Department  has  secured  the  services  of  an  expert  ingrain  gradi 

hould  be  of  the  greatest  value  in  working-  out 
the  many  problems  wh:  rily  be  connected  with  this 

important  line  of  work. 

DRY-LAND    FARMING. 

Recognizing  th  sity  for  more  systematic  efforts  along-  the  line 

of  dry-land  farming-,  during  the  past  year  important  held  and 
laboratory  i:.  s    lions  have  been  arranged  for,  which,  it  i<  believed, 

will  be  of  great  value  to  the  iiave  already  settled  or  who  con- 

template settling  .rid  areas  where  irrigation  is  impracticable. 

The  Great  Plains  area,  lying  between  the  ninety-eighth  and  one  hun- 
dred and  fourth  meridians  and  including  approximately  33  uare 
miles,  is  one  of  the  most  important  di  here  this  work  is  being 
conducted. 

.:  of  the  investigations. — Throughout  this  vast  area  there  is 
not  a  single  State  experiment  station,  although  there  are  several  sub- 
station-. The  plan  of  the  work  is  to  establish  special  substations  in 
cooperation  with  the  :  periment  stations  in  North  Dakota.  South 

ta.    Nel  .    Oklahoma.    Colorad  aid   Texas.      At 

the-  -■       ill  be  carried  on  which  will  enable  the 

S<   :-- authorities  and  the  Depart mei.:  definitely  important 

questions  as  to  systems  of  cropping  and  farm  management  in  this 
:ded  area.     Th-    -  -ful  work  already  inaugurated  with  the 

durum  wheat  to  the  belief  that  there  are  several  other  crops 

which  might  al-o  prove  highly  ful. 

Advice  to  prospective  settlers. — On  account  of  the  efforts  made 
by  land  agents  for  the  pa.-t  two  or  three  years  to  induce  farmers  to 
up  land  in  this  region  it  seem-  proper  to  make  a  few  cautioi 

gard  to  this  enti  n  of  country.     While  there 

ricultural  possibilities  in  the  region",  the  fact  must  not  be 
hat  farming  there  must  be  conducted  along  radically  differ- 
ent lines  from  those  of  the  more  humid  portions  of  the  Unite 

■  tiers  ha  who  will  be 

pointed  in  the  near  future.     In  spite  of  the  fact  that 

given  abundant  rainfalls,  the  evidence  is 

5  will  s     d  resume  their  norn 

which  is  one  of  semiaridity.  and  onditions  must  be  met  in  a 

way  for  which  few  farmers  of  the  section  are  now  prepared.     It  is 

Iful  to  look  with  groat  caution  upon  the  staten  :ianating 

from  interested  parties     -  bability  of  continued  rainfalls  and 

the  growing-  of  •  ommonly  known  to  the 

mo:  -the  United  £ 


REPORT  OF  THE  BBCBEXABT.  47 

GOOD  SEED  FOR  THE  FARM] 

Feral  linos  of  work  carried  on  duri;  year  have   for  their 

object  the  improvement  of  the  seed  upon  which  th  must  depend 

for  his  crops.     The  iaves  Df  seed   adulterations  previously 

mentioned  in  these  report-  have  been  continued,  and  there  i-  ev<  ry  evi- 
dence that  the  publication  of  the  names  of  firms  found  to  be  selling-  adul- 
terated seed  has  beea  the  means  of  checking  the  evil.  In  all  this  work 
the  Department  has  but  one  object,  namely,  to  protect  the  farmer  from 
unscrupulous  dealers  who  make  a  practice  of  foisting  bad  seed  i 
him.  The  rank  and  file  of  American  seedsmen  do  not  follow  any  such 
practices  and  are  as  anxious  as  the  Department  to  protect  the  farmer. 

A  campaign  of  education.  — The  Seed  Laboratory  ha  '  >oth 

seedsmen  and  farmers  hundreds  of  sample-  -  during  the  past  year, 

and  in  this  way  has  greatly  encouraged  the  propaganda  for  good  seed. 
A  feature  of  the  work  has  been  a  campaign  of  education  for  bet 
Cheap  seed  is  often  the  most  expensive  thing  connected  with  a  crop. 
•v  cent<  saved  on  each  pound  of  alfalfa  or  clover  seed  may  cost 
the  farmer  all  of  his  work  in  preparing  and  fertilizing  the  ground, 
besides  the  loss  of  an  entire  season  in  getting  the  crop  started.  The 
Bureau  has  also  been  actively  engaged  in  encouraging  the  good-seed 
work  through  addresses  at  farmers'  institutes  and  other  meeting-. 

Better  grades  of  seed  corx. — Special  work  has  been  done  during 
the  past  year  in  demonstrating-  the  great  importance  of  high-grade 
I  corn.  The  work  was  inaugurated  to  establish  the  great  value  of 
proper  care  of  the  ordinary  seed  as  grown  by  the  farmer.  The  main 
point  at  issue  was  the  gain  in  yield  due  to  the  vitality  of  the  seed. 
Actual  held  demonstrations  have  shown  that,  taking  corn  in  the  aver- 
age— that  is.  corn  from  different  parts  of  the  United  States  as  ordi- 
narily saved  for  seed  by  farmers— the  yield  would  be  increased  about 
15  per  cent  if  the  vitality  were  perfect.  The  Department  has  pointed 
out  simple  methods  of  testing  vitality  that  any  farmer  can  follow,  and 
has  shown  in  field  practice  that  the  adoption  of  such  methods  by  the 
farmer  may  increase  his  yield  from  10  to  15  per  cent.  Similar  work 
has  been  conducted  with  a  number  of  other  crops. 

WORK    OX    THE    SUOAR    BEET. 

Production  of  high-grade  strains  of  seed. — The  work  on  breed- 
ing high-grade  strains  of  sugar-beet  seed  has  been  very  satisfactory 
during  the  year.  This  work  i-  being  conducted  in  cooperation  with  a 
number  of  experiment  stations  and  private  individuals.  The  first 
commercial  crop  of  seed  raised  from  roots  selected  tinier  departmental 
supervision  was  harvested  this  year  by  a  grower  in  Washington  State 
and  some  15,000  pounds  of   seed  were   secured,  all  from  beets  which, 


48  YEARBOOK    OF    THE   DEPARIMEN'T    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

commercially  analyzed  1  -partment.  showed  sugar  contents  of 

22]  r.     In  the  work  of  selection  rigid  attention  is  given  to 

y  detail  of  size,  color,  form  of  root,  shape  of  leaf.  etc.  The 
Department  has  received  from  a  number  of  sources  satisfactory  evi- 
dence that  the  American  seed  which  it  is  developing  is  highly  satis- 
fact  ne  factory  alone  reports  that  the  American-grown  seed 

increased  the  yield  1.19  tons  per  acre  on  an  area  covering  391  ac 
divided  amo:  _  Farmers.  1  was  put  out  in  competition  with 

some  of  the  most  expensive  grades  of  imported  seed  obtainable.      As 
a  line  of  work  closely  connected  with  the  foregoing,  the  Department 
iref ally  investigating  and  testing  various  varieties  of  sugar-beet 
seed  imported,  together  with  all  strains  of  sugar-beet  »Town  by 

d  firms. 

— Very  satisfac  Its  have  been  secured  in 

the  development  of  a  su_  seed  which  will  contain  a  single  germ, 

highly  importai  I  1  which  will  eliminate  a  con- 

.  able  portion  of  the  work  of  thinning.  The  latest  returns  from 
our  inv-  us  along  this  line  >how  that  our  beets  are  averaging 

about  26  per  cent  of  single-germ  seed  and  that  such  seed  is  producing 
lding  from  16  to  17  per  cent  sugar.     The  purity  coefficient  is 
round  to  be  satisfactory. 
The  important  work  on  fertilizers,  the  improvement  of  cultural  con- 
ditions, and  the  extension  of  the  sugar-beet  area  has  been  continued. 

FRUIT    MARKETING.   TRANSPORTATION.  AND    STORAGE    INVESTIGATIONS. 

Experimental  investigations  of  the  methods  of  harvesting,  packing, 
transporting,  and  storing  fresh  fruits  of  various  kinds  have  been  con- 
tinued during  the  year.     The  fruit  transportation  studies  have  been 
confined  chiefly  to  questions  involved  in  the  transcontinental  shipment 
of  deciduous  and  citrus  fruits  of  the  Pacific  coast  to  eastern  markets. 
.  .ipments  OF    PEACHES  and  plums. — Experimental  carload   ship- 
ments of  perishable  varieties  of  peaches  and  plums,  which  were  allowed 
to  remain  on  the  tree-  in  California  until  they  reached  much  fuller 
ripeness  than  has  previously  been  considered  safe  by  shipper-,  dis- 
tat  such  fruit  can  be  delivered  in  eastern  markets  in 
"  ically  as  sound  condition  as  when  taken  from  the  tree.     The  supe- 
riority in  flavor  and  wholesomeness  of  such  sound,  ripe  fruit  as  com- 
pared with  fruit  either  overripe  and  decayed  or  prematurely  picked 
and  which  makes  up  so  large  a  portion  of  the  commercial  sup- 

ply of  our  citie-.  sarly  apparent.     Special  treatment  of  these 

experimental  shipments  consisted  simply  in  the  quick  cooling  of  the 
packed  fruit  from  the  higli  temperatures  which  it  possessed  when  picked 
from  the  tree  to  a  temperature  of  4<  F.  before  it  was  loaded 

in  ordinary  iced  cars  for  shipment.     Carloads  of  fruit  thus  treated  not 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  49 

only  required  less  ice  in  transit,  but  maintained  more  uniform  tempera- 
tures in  the  top  and  bottom  of  the  car,  with  resultant  greater  uniform- 
ity of  condition  of  contents  when  unloaded. 

Experiments  in  citrus  fruit  transportation. — Along  similar 
lines,  but  with  closer  attention  to  methods  of  harvesting  and  manipu- 
lating the  fruit,  a  careful  study  of  orange-handling  methods  in  southern 
California  was  made.  This  revealed  many  interesting  and  important 
facts.  It  was  found  that  the  difference  in  the  carrying  quality  of 
oranges  from  different  producing  districts  in  southern  California  was 
due  primarily  to  the  methods  of  handling  practiced  rather  than  to 
inherent  characteristics  of  the  fruit  itself.  Oranges  free  from  mechan- 
ical injuries,  inflicted  during  the  various  processes  of  harvesting, 
rarely  showed  decay  during  the  ordinary  shipment  period,  even  when 
transported  without  icing.  On  the  contrary,  similar  fruit  which  had 
suffered  from  inconspicuous  cuts  or  abrasions  of  the  skin  developed 
from  25  to  75  per  cent  of  decay  under  similar  conditions.  A  compre- 
hensive series  of  experiments,  in  which  fruit  treated  by  different 
methods  was  subjected  to  conditions  favorable  to  the  development  of 
deca3T,  showed  that  where  unmutilated  fruit  as  it  came  from  the  tree 
developed  but  1.5  per  cent  of  decay,  similar  fruit,  when  dry  brushed, 
showed  4.5  per  cent,  and  washed  fruit  10.5  per  cent.  The  whole 
trend  of  the  results  of  the  investigation  thus  far  indicates  that  com- 
plexity of  methods  and  appliances  in  the  handling  of  oranges  results 
in  increased  mechanical  injury  and  correspondingly  heavy  losses  from 
decay  in  transit. 

A  study  of  the  transportation  of  oranges  across  the  continent,  in 
which  different  methods  of  shipment  were  compared,  showed  that 
where  oranges  that  had  been  mechanically  injured  were  shipped  under 
ventilation,  1-1  per  cent  of  decay  developed.  Similar  fruit  shipped 
under  ordinary  icing  developed  7  per  cent  of  decay,  while  fruit  that 
was  precooled  and  shipped  in  iced  cars  developed  but  -1  per  cent. 
Studies  of  the  effect  of  holding  the  packed  fruit  before  shipment 
showed  that,  on  the  average,  fruit  shipped  the  first  day  after  packing 
developed  but  2  per  cent  of  decay;  that  shipped  the  third  day,  3.5  per 
cent;  the  fifth,  8.6  per  cent,  and  the  seventh  da}^,  9.5  per  cent.  The 
proportion  of  decay  developed  in  the  mechanically  injured  fruit 
included  in  the  above  experiments  was  very  much  above  these  general 
averages,  the  important  fact  developed  being  that  prompt  shipment 
after  packing  greatly  reduces  the  risk  in  transit. 

Results  of  fruit  transportation  wtork.— These  investigations 
have  had  the  active  support  of  growers,  shippers,  and  transportation 
interests.  In  the  citrus  industry  advantage  is  being  taken  of  the 
results  of  the  work.  Packing  houses  are  being  remodeled  and  simpli- 
fied, the  fruit  is  being  shipped  more  quickly  after  picking.  All  the 
3     A1906 4 


50  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

interests  involved  have  shown  a  disposition  to  take  advantage  of  the 

eloped  in  the  investigations.     One  of  the  prominent  shipping 

interests  of  the  Pacific  coast  has  estimated  that  the  work  of  the  Bureau 

along  this  line  saved  the  grower-  at  leasl   ■--■     000  in  the  season  of 

-     :   FRUIT  STORAGE. — In  the  f ruit-storage  investigations  the 

study  of  the  effect  of  sod  and  tillage  on  the  keeping  of 

eeu    continued  with  the    New  York  State  Agricultural 

oent  Station,  and  special  studies  in  relation  to  ternperat 

d  made  in  the  East.     The  apple- storage  investigation-  have 

tended  to  Pacific  roast  fruit,  considerable  quantities  of  apples 

from  different  California  apple  districts  having  been  stored  in  that 

and  in  the  East  for  comparison.     Special  attention  has  been 

given  to  farm  storage-house  questi 

Export  shipments  of  fruits. — In  the  fruit-marketing  investiga- 
tions the  experimental  export  shipment  of  summer  apples  from  Dela- 
ware was  continued,  and  similar  shipments  also  of  winter  varieties 
from  New  York  and  Virginia.  The  problems  connected  with  the 
exportation  of  winter  apples  to  European  countries  arc  recognized  as 
of  the  highest  importance  in  this  ion  and  are  being  studied  as 

thoroughly  as  the  conditions  render  practicable.  The  importance  of  the 
apple  export  trade  to  our  domestic  fruit  industry  is  shown  by  the  fact 
that  while  the  crop  of  1905  was  estimated  to  bo  the  smallest  during 
the  past  decade,  the  portion  exported  was  but  7  per  cent  le^s  than  the 
avei    _  lie  previous  rive  years,  constituting,  as  nearly  as  can  be 

mated,  mure  than  5  per  cent  of  the  estimated  total  crop.     Fuller 
information  as  to  conditions  prevailing  in  ocean  transportation  and  in 
j;n  mark  atly  needed. 

The  exportation  of  eastern-grown  "Bartlett"  and  other  early  pears, 
i  :  apartment  experiments  in  1901,  shows  a  grati- 
fying .  the  total  exports  of  pears  during  the  fiscal  year  being 
vale  7i\  the  larger  part  of  which  were  of  eastern- 

ficial  effeet  of  this  export  movement  of  pears 
•  lent  in  our  markets,  where  good  prices  prevailed  in  eon- 

DEVELOPTNG    NEW    CROPS    BY    BREEDING    AND    SELECTIOX. 

rk   in  developing,  by  breeding  and  selection,  new 
s  been  very  successful  during  t!  ear'. 

I,  son      i  .  which  have  been 
I  with  ;_  •  .\v  being  grown  on  a  large  scale. 

—The  production  of  the  >up  of  fruits, 

far-reaching 
ut  triumph-  whi  achieved  a-  a  result  of  care- 

fully xperiments.     Three  varieties— the  Rusk,  Wil- 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  51 

lits,  and  Morton — have  already  been  named,  and  trees  have  been  dis- 
tributed to  about  2,000  fruit  growers  and  nurserymen,  principally  in 
the  Gulf  States  and  in  Oregon  and  Washington.  Two  other  new  vari- 
eties have  been  produced,  having  large  fruits  similar  in  appearance  to 
ordinary  oranges,  and  these  will  be  named  and  distributed  in  the  near 
future.  Both  of  these  varieties  are  somewhat  different  from  the  sorts 
previously  named,  and  are  believed  to  possess  superior  merits  in  cer- 
tain characters.  Both  are  large,  fine-appearing  acid  fruits,  and  are 
very  juicy.  They  will  prove  valuable,  especially  for  culinary  purposes 
and  in  the  making  of  acid  drinks.  Another  variety  has  been  secured 
which  has  fairly  good  fruits,  and  gives  promise  of  utility  as  a  hedge 
plant  and  lawn  tree.  The  citranges  are  of  special  value  for  cultiva- 
tion in  regions  slightly  too  cold  for  the  ordinary  orange,  and  can  be 
recommended  for  planting  throughout  the  Gulf  States  and  in  regions 
of  low  altitude  in  Oregon,  Washington,  Arizona,  and  New  Mexico. 

New  pineapple  varieties. — Three  of  the  new  varieties  of  hybrid 
pineapples  have  this  year  been  distributed  to  a  number  of  good  grow- 
ers, and  next  year  stock  of  all  of  the  new  varieties  developed  by  the 
Department  will  be  available  for  distribution.  The  further  experi- 
ments in  this  field  have  resulted  in  the  discovery  of  six  more  new 
hybrids  which  possess  qualities  that  will  render  them  valuable  for  cul- 
tivation. These  will  be  placed  with  growers  at  the  earliest  possible 
date.  All  of  the  new  varieties  of  pineapples  are  superior  in  flavor  to 
the  ordinary  varieties,  and  many  of  them  have  smooth  or  spineless 
leaves,  a  quality  of  considerable  value  to  the  grower.  All  pineapple 
growers  who  have  had  an  opportunity  to  examine  and  test  these 
hybrids  are  impressed  with  their  superior  quality  and  promise. 

A  new  early  variety  OF  cotton. — It  has  been  claimed  by  ento- 
mologists and  others  studying  the  control  of  the  cotton  boll  weevil 
that  varieties  of  cotton  are  needed  which  will  mature  their  entire 
product  very  early  in  the  season,  in  order  to  permit  the  crop  to  be 
harvested  and  the  stalks  destroyed  early  in  the  fall.  A  new  early 
defoliate  variety  has  been  produced  by  an  agent  of  the  Department, 
working  in  cooperation  with  the  Texas  Agricultural  Experiment  Sta- 
tion, which  possesses  these  qualities  in  marked  degree  and  which,  at 
the  same  time,  is  a  productive  sort  having  fairty  large  bolls.  This 
new  variety,  the  present  season,  ripened  its  fruit  and  matured  earlier 
than  any  other  of  the  varieties  tested  in  comparison  with  it,  among 
them  being  the  King,  which  is  probably  the  earliest  variety  cultivated. 
The  new  variety  gives  promise  of  being  of  great  value  for  planting 
in  boll-weevil  infested  regions.  Several  other  varieties  of  cotton 
selected  to  secure  earliness  and  productiveness,  fitting  them  for  boll- 
weevil  conditions,  have  been  under  experimentation,  and  select  seed 
of  two  of  these  sorts,  the  Edson  and  Triumph,  will  be  distributed 
this  winter. 


D'2  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGMCTILTTJBE. 

New  strains  of  corn. — In  the  corn-breeding  experiments  great 
advances  have  been  made.  One  variety,  which  has  been  carefully  bred 
in  central  Ohio.  has.  for  the  last  four  years,  shown  an  average  yearly 
gain  of  10  bushels  per  acre  over  the  original  variety.  Seed  of  this 
variety  has  been  sent  to  numerous  farmers  and  is  giving  excellent 
results.  The  breeding  work  with  sweet  corn,  having  as  its  object  the 
improvement  of  -trains  for  canning* purposes,  has  been  continued  with 
good  suce--.  It  has  been  demonstrated  that  an  excellent  quality  of 
sweet  coro  steed  can  be  grown,  and  that  with  good  care  it  will  germinate 
much  better  and  produce  a  better  crop  than  such  seed  as  is  customarily 
purchased  by  canning  companies. 

Improvement  of  oats. — The  most  promising  features  of  the  oat- 
breeding  work  are  the  new  hybrids  recently  developed.  These  are 
large  grained  and  early  in  season,  and  retain  the  vigor  and  size  of  the 
late-season  parent.  They  bid  fair  to  excel  and  eventually  succeed  all 
the  early  varieties  now  grown  in  the  central  Mississippi  region.  Selec- 
tions for  disease  resistance  have  also  been  made,  and  the  year's  experi- 
ments have  proved  that  it  is  possible  to  secure  smut-resistant  varieties. 
One  selection  of  the  Burt  variety  has  proved  to  be  almost  smut  proof. 

Crops  resistant  to  alkali  and  drought.—  The  testing  of  different 
varieties  of  the  leading  field  crops  with  regard  to  their  alkali  resistance 
is  being  continued  and  extended.  Much  information  that  will  permit 
of  a  choice  of  crop  plants  and  plant  varieties  for  alkali  lands  and  pro- 
vide a  solid  basis  for  the  increase  of  resistance  by  breeding  has  been 
obtained.  The  held  investigations  of  crop  plants  in  relation  to  alkali 
are  being  supplemented  by  extensive  laboratory  experiments.  As  a 
part  of  the  investigations  of  the  Bureau  in  dry-land  agriculture,  the 
breeding  of  drought-resistant  strains  of  important  field  crops  has  been 
taken  up  in  cooperation  with  some  of  the  State  experiment  stations. 

PROGRESS   IN   TOBACCO   WORK. 

The  tobacco-breeding  experiments  have  proved  particularly  succ  ss- 
ful.  and  several  of  the  new  sorts  produced  in  the  course  of  the  Depart- 
ment's experiments  have  already  been  planted  extensively  by  tobacco 
growers,  and  are  giving  excellent  results  in  increa.-ed  yields  of  a  superior 
grade  of  tobacco. 

Connecticut  wrapper  tobacgos. — In  the  work  of  improving  Con- 
necticut wrapper  tobaccos  two  new  hybrids  have  been  produced — the 
Brewer  and  the  Cooley.  The  Brewer  i-  a  hybrid  of  the  native  I 
necticut  Broadleaf  with  the  imported  Cuban,  while  the  Cooley  is  a 
hybrid  of  the  native  Connecticut  Havana  Seed  variety  with  the 
Imported  Sumatra.  In  the  hybrids  the  good  qualities,  hardiness,  and 
adaptability  to  Connecticut  condition-  of  the  native  varieties  are  com- 
bined with  the  superior  wrapper  qualities  of  the  imported  Cuban  and 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  53 

Sumatra.  The  product  of  the  hybrids  has  superior  qualities  for  cigar- 
wrapper  purposes,  possessing  characters  which  go  to  make  up  a  valu- 
able wrapper  tobacco.  Numerous  growers  have  been  pleased  with  the 
superior  grade  of  tobacco  produced  by  these  hybrids  and  are  this  year 
growing  a  considerable  quantity  of  the  new  varieties  and  selecting  seed 
to  extend  their  planting  next  year. 

Wrapper  and  filler  tobaccos  in  the  South. — The  experiments 
conducted  in  Florida  in  the  improvement  of  tobacco  varieties  have 
demonstrated  the  value  of  this  work  to  growers.  Carefully  selected 
strains  of  Sumatra  have  clearly  shown  their  superiority,  both  in  qual- 
ity and  yielding  capacity,  to  the  ordinary  Sumatra-grown.  The  crops 
grown  from  select  seed  furnished  by  the  Department  to  12  different 
planters  are  far  superior  to  the  remainder  of  their  crops  and  are 
decidedly  the  best  crops  of  tobacco  in  the  State.  As  a  result  of  this 
demonstration  of  the  value  of  the  methods  of  selection  and  preserva- 
tion of  seed  worked  out  b}T  the  Department  of  Agriculture,  almost  all 
of  the  large  tobacco  growers  are  this  }"ear  using  similar  methods,  aud 
more  than  50,000  paper  bags  have  been  used  during  the  past  summer 
by  growers  in  covering  the  flower  clusters  of  their  select  seed  plants. 

Maryland  smoking  tobaccos. — Experiments  in  the  improvement 
of  the  Maryland  smoking  tobaccos  have  been  carried  on  during  the 
year  in  cooperation  with  the  Maryland  Agricultural  Experiment 
Station.  Selections  made  to  secure  greater  uniformity  and  increased 
yields  have  shown  striking  results.  The  fields  of  tobacco  grown  from 
select  seed  are  believed  to  be  the  best  tobacco  grown  in  the  State  the 
present  season. 

Miscellaneous  tobacco  work. — One  of  the  most  important  features 
of  the  tobacco-breeding  investigations  is  the  development  of  methods  by 
which  the  grade  and  quality  of  the  tobacco  produced  can  be  accurately 
determined.  During  the  last  year  an  apparatus  has  been  devised  for 
testing  the  burn  of  cigars  accurately  and  another  for  testing  the  burn 
of  strips  of  leaves.  These  machines  will  prove  of  great  value  in  con- 
nection with  the  breeding  experiments  and  probably  also  in  the  com- 
mercial testing  of  samples  of  wrapper  tobacco.  Investigations  of  the 
curing  of  tobacco  have  been  undertaken,  directed  more  especially 
toward  the  control  of  pole  burn  by  means  of  artificial  heat.  Several 
diseases  of  tobacco  are  receiving  attention,  and  the  breeding  of  varie- 
ties for  disease  resistance  gives  promise  of  good  results. 

Extension  of  experiments. — The  tobacco-breeding  experiments 
are  being  extended  to  the  tobacco-producing  areas  of  Kentuck}-,  Ohio, 
and  Virginia,  and  it  is  probable  that  results  can  be  obtained  in  these 
regions  as  important  as  those  produced  in  Connecticut  and  Florida. 
The  introduction  of  the  methods  of  seed  selection  and  seed  separation 
alone  in  these  extensive  tobacco-producing  States  will  add  many  thou- 
sands of  dollars  to  the  value  of  the  crop  grown. 


5-1  YEARBOOK    OF    THE   DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

DRUG   AND   POISONOUS    PLANT    i:         ■  lTIONS. 

Work  on  camphor. — Rapid  progress  has  been  made  in  the  investi- 
gation of  camphor  production,  a  number  of  camphor  trees  of  various 
ages  having  been  placed  at  the  disposal  of  the  Department  for  experi- 
mental work.  More  than  30  pounds  of  camphor  were  prepared,  which 
on  purification  gave  very  favorable  results.  Tests  of  a  scientific  nature 
showed  the  identity  of  this  product  with  that  of  the  Orient  refill 

survey  of  the  camphor  trees  now  widely  scattered  throughout  Florida, 
and  of  the  conditions  of  soil,  drainage,  etc..  in  which  they  occur,  has 
made  it  seem  reasonably  clear  that  camphor  will  nor..  -  r  a  large 

part  of  the  area  from  which  frost  has  driven  the  orang      ndustry. 

Studies  of  poisonous  plants. — In  the  poisonous-plant  investiga- 
tions chief  attention  has  been  given  during  the  year  to  the  poisonous 
action  of  the  so-called  loco  weeds  in  causing  the  loco  disease  in  horses 
and  cattle.  The  general  outcome  of  this  work  has  shown  very  clearly 
that  these  weeds  are  able  to  produce  the  symptoms  characteristic  of 
locoism  and  are  unquestionably  the  chief  cause  o: 

-tock-grazing  interests  of  the  West.  Remedial  measures  are  now 
being  sought,  as  are  also  means  of  exterminating  the  weeds  and  meth- 
ods of  counteracting  the  poison. 

PROGRESS    IX    GROWING    AMERICAN    TEA. 

The  work  in  South  Carolina  for  the  purpose  of  determining  the 
ibilities  of  the  commercial  production  of  tea  in  the  Unite  IS        - 
has  prog  s        Factorily  during  the  year.     The  younger 

have  given  an  increased  yield,  due  in  part  to  a  change  in  the  method 
of  picking  which  sted  during  the  year.     As  a  result  of  all  :.. 

ences  th<  eld  during  the  history  of  the  experhn 

obtained,  .-.'.met king  over  12.000  pounds  of  dry  tea.     In  tin 
some  new  machinery  was  tested.     The  compression  of  finely  ground 
tea  into  tablets  was  attempted  with  a  machine  of  the  same 
type  as  that   .      1  by  m  taring  chemists,  the  result  .   that 

after  a  few  trials  a  hard,  sightly  3  which 

dissolves  i:;   h  >t  water.     The  superior  adapt  3  form  of 

paration  for  -   is  desired  is  appai 

In  addition  to  the  work  in  South  Carolina  a  tea  g 

t  Pierce.  Tex.     The  work  at  this  point  gi     -  se  of 

very  satisfactory  results. 

IMPROVEMENTS    IN    DISTRIBUTING    NITROGEN-FIXING    BACTERIA. 

The  method  of  distributing  cultures  dried  on  cotton  for  the  inoc 
tion  of  leguminous  crops  was  discontinued  during  the  year,  and  in 
its  place  the  plan  adopted  of  distributing  pure  liquid  cultures  her- 
metically sealed  in  glass  tubes.     This  has  been  proved  to  be  a  g 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  55 

improvement  over  the  old  system.  It  is  planned  to  distribute  during 
the  current  year  larger  cultures  to  the  farmers,  and  thus  render  it  pos- 
sible to  reduce  the  time  formerly  required  to  develop  a  rich  culture 
for  inoculating-  leguminous  crops.  Many  held  tests  in  this  work  are 
under  way  on  large  farms,  and  it  i-  hoped  by  this,  careful  experi- 
mental work  to  acquire  much  valuable  information  concerning  the 
best  manner  of  treatment  of  certain  soils  and  crops  in  order  to  obtain 
successful  inoculations. 

WORK    OX    WATER    CONTAMINATION. 

The  work  of  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  in  the  treatment  of  water 
supplies  with  copper  sulphate  for  the  destruction  of  alga?  and  patho- 
genic bacteria  has  passed  from  the  experimental  stage  to  that  of  actual 
practical  use.  Investigations  of  the  use  of  copper  sulphate  in  sewage 
disposal  have  indicated  that  in  small  sewage  plants  the  use  of  copper 
will  make  it  possible  to  produce  sewage  effluents  that  are  entirely  free 
from  pathogenic  bacteria.  Work  is  being  planned  to  test  the  etneieney 
of  copper  in  connection  with  filtration.  Additional  work  is  to  be  car- 
ried on  throughout  the  United  States  in  order  to  determine  the  value 
of  copper  in  various  types  of  water.  The  copper  treatment  of  water 
supplies,  sewage  disposal,  etc..  should  in  all  cases  be  supervised  by  an 
expert.  Before  this  method  of  purification  is  attempted  the  condi- 
s  must  be  worked  out  on  a  scientific  basis  in  each  instance. 

FARM-MANAGEMENT    INVESTIGATIONS. 

The  farm-management  investigations  during  the  past  year  have  been 
carried  on  along  two  principal  lines,  namely,  the  study  of  farm  prac- 
tice and  demonstrations  in  improved  methods.  The  object  of  the 
first  is  to  make  a  careful  study  of  farm  methods  as  followed  by  sue- 
i  essful  men  in  different  sections  of  the  country  and  representing 
different  types  of  agriculture.  These  studies  lead  to  the  securing  of 
data  which  enable  the  Department  to  assist  farmers  and  others  in 
planning  methods  of  cropping  and  maintaining  soil  fertility.  In  con- 
nection with  this  work  special  attention  has  been  given  to  crops 
adapted  to  new  sections  and  to  the  relation  between  certain  improved 
crops  and  soil  fertility.  Alfalfa  has  been  found  to  be  adapted  to  an 
important  soil  formation  in  Alabama  and  Mississippi,  and  is  rapidly 
becoming  a  valuable  crop  of  that  section.  This  soil  is  heavily  charged 
with  lime.  In  this  connection  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  follows 
closely  the  work  of  the  Bureau  of  Soils  in  its  soil  mapping.  A  spe- 
cial study  has  been  made  during  the  year  of  the  practices  of  farmers 
in  the  East  who  have  been  successful  in  growing  alfalfa. 

Methods  of  storing  silage.— In  connection  with  the  studies  of 
farm  practice,  a  special  investigation  has  been  made  during  the  year 


56  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

of  methods  of  storing  silage.  The  kinds  of  crops  used  for  silage,  the 
cost  of  growing  and  of  siloing  them  have  all  been  considered. 

Control  of  Johnson  grass. — The  farm-management  investigations 
also  deal  with  the  question  of  weed  control.  It  is  believed  that  data 
have  been  secured  which  will  enable  the  farmer  to  control  Johnson 
grass  and  utilize  it  in  a  satisfactory  way  in  crop  rotation  in  the  South. 
The  secret  of  success  in  this  work  lies  in  the  fact  that  in  a  Johnson 
grass  sod  left  undisturbed  for  two  or  three  years  the  rootstocks  are 
found  only  at  the  surface.  In  this  condition  the  pe-t  i-  easily  destroyed 
by  -hallow  plowing  and  a  little  extra  cultivation  the  next  summer. 
This  permits  Johnson  grass  to  be  grown  in  a  rotation,  such  as  <otton, 
corn  and  cowpeas.  winter  oats,  and  Johnson  grass  for  two  years. 
Where  the  pest  is  allowed  to  grow  on  land  that  is  cultivated  in  cotton 
or  corn  the  rootstocks  penetrate  deeply  into  the  -oil  and  eradication 
is  extremely  difficult. 

Cactus-feeding  experiments. — Investigations  into  the  value  of 
cactus  as  food  for  cattle  have  been  continued.  A  carload  of  steers  were 
fattened  on  cactus  and  cotton-seed  meal,  at  a  cost  of  Z-h  cents  per  pound 
of  gain.  As  a  feed  for  dairy  cows  0  pounds  of  fresh  cactus  equaled 
1  pound  of  sorghum  hay  when  fed  with  a  mixture  of  grain  and  mill  stuff. 

Object-lesson  farms. — The  object-lesson  farms  referred  to  in  for- 
mer reports  have  been  continued.  A-  the  result  of  the  work  on  one  of 
these  farms,  many  farmers  in  Alabama  have  sown  alfalfa  and  are  thus 
preparing  for  the  advent  of  the  boll  weevil.  The  great  advantage  of 
pasturing  hogs  on  alfalfa  in  that  section  has  been  demonstrated.  In 
order  to  meet  the  demand  for  object-lesson  farms  in  the  South  the 
system  of  establishing  these  farms  has  been  changed.  Instead  of 
assuming  close  supervision  of  the  farms,  working  plans  are  now  pre- 
pared. This  enables  the  Department  to  reach  many  more  localities 
than  were  possible  under  the  former  -y stern. 

Nearly  all  successful  farms  are  unique  in  their  management.  They 
represent  systems  wrought  out  by  men  of  unusual  energy  and  intelli- 
gence who  have  gone  resolutely  about  discovering  and  utilizing  the 
full  possibilities  of  their  land.  From  such  men  we  are  learning  facts 
which  when  properly  classified  will  constitute  the  art  of  farm  man- 
agement. These  farms  demonstrate  the  great  value  of  intelligent 
management,  as  compared  with  hard  work  applied  unintelligently. 

SPECIAL    WORK    OX    COTTON. 

The  special  work  on  cotton  which  has  for  its  object  the  meeting  of 
the  ravages  of  the  boll  weevil  in  the  South  has  been  continued  along 
pretty  nearly  the  -tune  line-  set  forth  in  my  last  report.  The  coope- 
rative work  with  farmers  has  been  a  special  feature  and  has  been 
extended  into  Louisiana,   Mississippi,  and  Arkansas.     This  work  is 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  57 

now  carried  on  in  the  States  mentioned,  and  in  addition  special  atten- 
tion has  been  devoted  to  Texas,  which  is  in  the  heart  of  the  boll- 
weevil  infested  territory.  Experience  has  enabled  the  Bureau  of  Plant 
Industry  to  systematize  the  work  so  as  to  reach  practical  farmers  and 
secure  their  interest  and  cooperation.  It  is  estimated  that  through  this 
work  the  Department  is  now  reaching,  directly  and  indirectly,  in  the 
neighborhood  of  100,000  farmers  in  the  States  mentioned. 

The  plan  is  a  simple  one,  and  from  its  very  simplicity  is  found  to 
be  effective.  Meetings  of  farmers  are  held  in  different  communities 
and  arrangements  made  whereby  representative  men  agree  to  handle 
a  part  or  all  of  their  land  with  the  advice  and  assistance  of  the  Depart- 
ment's agents.  No  radical  recommendations  are  made  in  the  matter 
of  changing  the  existing  systems,  unless  such  systems  are  known  to 
be  bad.  The  varieties  of  cotton  known  to  be  best  adapted  for  boll- 
weevil  conditions  are  recommended  and  planted.  Systems  of  fer- 
tilization are  suggested  and,  wherever  practicable,  diversification  is 
encouraged.  The  farmers  who  are  cooperating  with  the  Department 
in  the  work  receive  regular  visits  from  our  agents  and,  in  addition, 
furnish  weekly  reports  setting  forth  their  operations  and  the  results. 
At  the  end  of  the  season  there  is,  as  a  rule,  a  demonstration  as  to  the 
effectiveness  and  value  of  the  sj^stems  laid  out  as  compared  with  the 
old  methods.  A  special  point  which  the  Department  makes  in  all 
this  work  is  that  no  radically  new  methods  are  being  urged.  We 
simply  endeavor  to  have  put  into  practice  methods  which  are  already 
known  to  be  highly  successful,  encouraging  the  farmer  himself  to 
take  the  leading  part  in  the  work. 

The  breeding  work,  having  for  its  object  the  securing  of  types  of 
cotton  better  adapted  to  boll-weevil  conditions,  has  already  been 
referred  to  under  the  head  of  plant-breeding  investigations.  As  a 
part  of  this  special  work  on  cotton,  investigations  of  root  rot  have 
been  continued,- the  same  being  largely  field  studies  to  determine  the 
value  of  crop  rotations  in  eradicating  the  pest  from  the  soil.  Inves- 
tigations of  cottons  found  in  Guatemala  and  other  southern  countries 
have  also  been  continued  and  some  interesting  results  secured.  Some 
of  these  cottons  give  promise  of  proving  valuable  for  use  in  connec- 
tion with  breeding  work.  Having  developed  for  a  long  series  of  }Tears 
in  combat  with  the  boll  weevil,  the}^  have  characteristics  quite  different 
from  an}T  tj'pes  of  cottons  which  we  now  possess. 

DEPARTMENT    GROUNDS   AND   ARLINGTON    FARM. 

The  Department  grounds,  consisting  of  40  acres,  are  now  in  a  well- 
developed  state.  During  the  year  all  the  roads  have  been  improved, 
a  special  appropriation  of  $3,500  being  used  for  the  purpose.  The 
glass  houses  on  the  grounds  have  been  further  improved  and  are  now 
being  used  for  manv  lines  of  work  carried  on  by  the  Bureau. 


LKBOOK   OF    THE   BKPABTMKNT    OF   AGBICUL.TT  . 

Arlington  Experimental  Farm  t"here  are  about  350  acres 
under  cultivation.  Many  varied  line>  of  work  are  being  carried  on. 
indn       _  iriety  tests  of  all  seeds  and 

er  crops  for  orchards,  variety  orchard  and  other 
frur  e  farm  i.  -  a  well-equipped  range  of  g 

work  and  all  the  newer  portions  of  the  land 
are       .  ._  ight  into  good  tilth,  by  the  use  of  proper  management 

and  green  ma 

DOS  SAL    .~EED    DISTRIBUTION. 

TL  nal  seed  work  for  the  year  has  conducted  along 

practical  .me  lines  as  in  the  past.     The  number  of  package 

mi-  »le  and  flower  seed  sent  out  during  the  year  was 

abov     \  There  has  been  no  change  in  this  number  during 

i 

FIELD   LABORATOl  D   TESTING   GARDENS. 

•pi  Valley  laboratory,  located  ar  the 

Bur  ......     [  many  of  the 

which  affect  foi  fruit  trees  in  th 

of  treating  :  3  have  also  been    "orkecl  out  during  the  y 

tven   to  t:.  rn-gall  disease  of 

orchard  and  other  fruits,  with  the  object  of  finding  a  means  for  prevent- 
ive further  spread  of  I  Hie  results  obi  .ined  have  shown 
gall  of  t                   "  ry  large!  nted 
rting  and  by  -      -                     pping"  °f 
paper.     It  has            found  that  this 
-                                                                 other  hand,  the 
►e  transmitted  through  the  soil  and  mav  be 
one  vineyard  to  another.     American 
staot  to  the  disc 
and"                                                                trol  will  consist              ..ow- 

roof  ha-  to  the 

lure  of  the  crown-gal  -      le  fruits. 

rk  on  various  _  ation  of 

inued  at  various  the 

-  of  the  living  tree  w  ■  •  sti     ted, 

particularly  I  ..  of  rot  which  d 

it.     A  L    . 

fitment  liminary  rhis 

on  could  be  prevented.    Th.  -dan  increase  of 

at  of  lun.  meaning  st  a  total  pre- 

The  m  -  rked  our  is  ..   tried  by 

lumbermen  on  a  > 


BEFORE    OF    THE    SECBETABY.  59 

At  the  Subtropical  Laboratory,  Miami.  Fla.,  the  Bureau  is  eondi 
iug  inyestigatious  of  the  diseases  affecting  tropical  and  subtropical 

plants,  such  as  the  mango,  avocado,  and  citrus  fruits.  Methods  have 
been  worked  out  for  the  control  of  these  troubles.  Experiments  in 
the  propagation  of  tropical  and  subtropical  fruits  con- 

ducted at  this  laboratory. 

The  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  is  carrying  on  at  its  Plant  Introduc- 
tion Garden,  located  at  Chico,  Cal..  experiments  in  the  pr  .  _  )n  of 
many  seeds  and  plants  introduced  from  foreign  countries.  Trial-  of 
forage  crops'and  vegetables  suited  to  the  Southwest  are  also  being 
conducted  at  this  garden.  Twelve  acre-  at  the  garden  have  beei 
aside  for  experimental  work  on  European  grape  varieties  cut- 

tings having  been  rooted  during  the  past  season.  A  number  of  these 
were  distributed  during  the  past  spring  among  the  experimental  vine- 
yards maintained  by  the  Bureau  in  different  parts  of  Califoi 
Experimental  work  in  the  propagation  of  tigs  and  of  the  pistache  nut 
is  also  being  carried  on  at  the  _  n  and  with  growers  in  the  South- 
western States. 

In  addition  to  the  fore.  he  Bureau  is  conducting  an  experi- 

mental farm  :it  San  Antonio.  Tex.     The  object   of  the  work  at 
farm  is  to  test  ne  -  likely  to  prove  of  v.         to  the  regie  a 

sented.  and  to  find  the  best  methods  of  tillage  by  which  the  relatively 
large  but  irregular  rainfall  of  the  region  may  be  utilized  in  th 
able  production  of  the  staple  crops. 

FOREST  SERVICE. 
NATIONAL   FOREST    RESERVES. 

The  fiscal  year  1905-6  was  and  will  remain  notable  in  the  history 
of  the  Forest  Service  for  the  progress  made  in  actually  applying  a 
National  reserve  policy.  In  area  the  reserves  were  increased  during 
the   year   from    -  122    to   106,999,138    acres.      In    revenue    the 

reserves  brought  in  $767,219.  against  I  >r  the  previ- 

ous year  and  S~  for  the  year  1903-4.     In  timbe    -  here 

were  disposed  of  for  immediate  or  early  removal  nearly  300  million 
board  feet  of  lumber  at  stumpage  prices  ranging  up  to  Si  per  thou- 
sand -  other  material  to  a  large  value),  as  again-: 
board  feet,  with  a  maximum  price  of  $2.  per  thousand  in 
and  ard  feet  in  1903-4.  The  number  of  free-use  per- 
mit-granted  in  the  same  showed  progressive  increase.  In 
the  year  1904-fi  the  reserves  were  under  Forest  control  only 
after  February  1. 

One  fiscal  year  of  full  control  has  establishe  aportant  fact. — 

that  the  reserves  advance  the  present  interests  of  the  people  of  the 
West  and  that  they  will  speedily  pay  the  cost  of  administering  them. 


(50  YEABBOOK    0¥    EBEB    DEPAETME>~T    OF   AGEICVLTUBE. 


PUBLIC   UTILITY   of   te: 


These  National  fores  s  lug  made  useful  now.     The  benefits  which 

thev  are  to  secure  are  not  deferred  benefits.  Through  Government 
control  the  interests  of  the  future  are  safeguarded,  but  not  by  sacri- 
ficing those  of  the  present.  Far  from  handicapping  the  development 
of  the  States  in  which  they  lie.  the  reserves  will  powerfully  promote 
development.  They  work  counter  to  the  prosecution  of  no  industry, 
and  retard  the  beneficial  use  of  no  resource. 

The  wealth  of  the  West  lies,  and  will  long  lie.  in  what  the  soil  will 
produce  and  in  what  the  earth  hides.  Labor  and  capital  will  here 
find  employment  mainly  in  turning  to  use  the  farm  land,  grazing  land, 
timber  land,  and  mineral  lands  of  the  region,  and  in  the  commerce  to 
which  these  great  productive  industries  will  give  rise.  That  the 
reserves  beneficially  affect  all  of  these  industries  is  becoming  clearer 
to  the  people  of  the  West  every  day.  and  in  consequence  the  policy  of 
public  administration  of  our  unappropriated  timber  lauds  become* 
more  and  more  firmly  established  in  the  approval  of  a  united  public 
sentiment.  Local  sentiment  has  sometimes  been  unfavorable  to  the 
creation  of  res  rv  -  before  their  effect  upon  the  public  welfare 
understood:  but  opposition  has  alwa]  ssolved  under  th. 

oal  experience. 

The  reserves  do  not  withhold  land  from  agricultural  use.  but  greatly 
increase  the  amount  of  available  farm  land.  Though  they  were  made 
from  the  most  rugged  and  mountainous  parts  of  the  West  and  were 
intended  to  include  only  land  unsuited  for  agricultui  .  the  act  of 
June'  11.  1906,  the  right  is  given  settlers  to  homestead  within  the 
reserves  wherever  strips  and  patches  of  tillable  land  can  be  found.  At 
the  same  time,  through  their  water-conserving  power.  the>e  forests  fix 
in  region-  of  -canty  rainfall  the  amount  of  land  which  can  be  brought 
under  the  plow,  since  at  be-t  much  otherwise  fertile  land  miht  go 
uncultivated  for  want  of  water.     Without  forest  pi  n  much 

of  the  land  now  under  irrigation  would  have  i  andoned  again  to 

the  desert.  Thus  the  promotion  of  agriculture  is  one  of  the  main  ends 
of  the  forest-reserve  poll 

Mining  in  the  West  is  mainly  in  regions  surrounded  by  reserve  - 
included  within  them:  but  the  reserves  do  not  imped.-  iopment 

of  mineral  resources.  On  the  contrary,  by  guaranteeing  future  sup- 
plies of  timber  they  are  indispensable  to  the  future  development  of 
these  resour  s,  -  the  great  mining  interests  well  know.  They  do 
not  interfere  with  the  pi  r,  who  has  the  same  right  to  prospect 

and  locate  in  forest  reserves  that  he  has  on  any  other  part  of  the 
public  domain. 

Administrative  control  of  the  forest  reserves  is  beneficial  to  the 
grazing  industry.  The  sentiment  of  stockmen  throughout  the  West  is 
unitedlv  in  favor  of  such  control,  because  of  the  gain  to  them  now 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  61 

that  the  reserve  ranges  are  safe  from  overcrowding  and  deterioration. 
Thus  the  rights  of  the  individual  user  are  respected  and  the  permanence 
of  this  great  resource  is  assured.  I  wish  to  commend  particularly  in 
this  connection  the  heartiness  and  good  spirit  with  which  the  associa- 
tions of  western  stockmen  have  cooperated  in  our  efforts  to  enforce 
fair  and  just  measures  for  the  regulation  of  grazing  in  the  interest  of 
all  users  of  the  forests,  and  in  the  interest  of  the  public,  to  whom  these 
forests  belong.  The  charge  of  a  grazing  fee,  made  for  the  first  time 
during  the  past  year,  though  reasonable  in  view  of  the  advantages  of 
grazing  regulation  to  the  stockmen  and  the  costof  reserve  administration 
to  the  Government,  and  justly  due  in  the  interest  of  the  public,  might 
have  been  expected  to  cause  dissatisfaction  and  friction.  On  the  con- 
trary, as  soon  as  the  reasons  for  the  charge  and  the  method  in  which 
it  would  be  applied  had  been  explained,  it  was  generally  approved 
and  paid  willingly  and  promptly.  It  was  followed  by  no  falling  off  in 
the  number  of  stock  grazed  in  the  reserves.  In  some  cases  the  asso- 
ciations of  stockmen  have  voluntarily  aided  the  Service  in  settling 
local  difficulties.  Their  whole  conduct  has  shown  remarkable  modera- 
tion, far-sightedness,  and  readiness  to  recognize  and  accept  what  is  in 
the  permanent  interest  of  their  industry,  even  though  it  involves  the 
sacrifice  of  immediate  personal  advantage. 

Finally,  Forest  Service  administration  of  the  reserves  is  beneficial 
alike  to  the  lumber  industry  and  to  the  timber-consuming  public. 
There  is  now  standing  on  the  reserves  not  less  than  300  billion  board 
feet  of  merchantable  timber.  This  is  not  locked  up  from'  present 
use  as  a  hoarded  supply  against  future  needs;  it  is  ready  for  the 
immediate  demands  of  a  developing  country.  It  will  not  be  rushed 
upon  the  wholesale  market  in  competition  with  the  cheap  stumpage 
prices  of  private  owners  anxious  for  ready  money,  and  it  will  not  be 
disposed  of  under  a  short-sighted  policy  of  utilization  which  would 
leave  a  gap  between  the  end  of  the  present  supply  and  the  oncoming 
of  the  second  crop;  but  it  is  and  will  continue  to  be  available,  first  for 
the  small  user — home-builder,  rancher,  or  miner — and  then  for  the 
needs  of  lumber  concerns,  large  miners,  and  railroads,  for  which  a 
timber  supply  is  indispensable,  and  which  in  turn  are  indispensable  to 
the  prosperity  of  the  West. 

The  supply  of  timber  furnished  by  the  matured  crop  now  on  the 
ground  is  so  vast  in  proportion  to  the  present  demand  that  there  might 
seem  to  be  no  need  for  caution  in  its  use.  Were  no  more  cut  than 
last  year  it  would  suffice  for  four  hundred  years.  In  the  mature 
forest  production  is  at  a  standstill,  so  that  from  the  point  of  view  of 
the  largest  possible  production  of  timber  lumbering  under  such 
methods  as  will  insure  a  second  crop  is  highly  desirable.  The  demand 
upon  the  reserves,  however,  is  as  yet  insignificant  in  proportion 
to  even  the  present  need,  most  of  which  is  met  by  the  suppl}'  from 


62  YEARBOOK   OF   THE   DEPAETMEZs'I    Of   AGEICULTY 

private  holdings.     The  reserves  form  the  heart  of  the  western  timber 
lands.     They  are  generally  less  accessible  than  the  private  holdi 
which  surround  them,  and  would  naturally  form  the  last  re-ource  of 
the  lumberman.     They  must  be  so  maintained  as  first  of  all  to  be 
readv  to  meet  the  future  demands  of  the  regions  in  which  they  lie. 
"With  a  growing  population  and  expanding  industries  these  demands 
will  far  exceed  those  of  the  present.     The  crucial  problem  of  ma: 
ment  will  be  to  insure  a  timber  and  water  supply  for  the  great  W 
and  to  conserve  the  summer  stock  ranges.     To  meet  it  successfully 
will  require  careful  foresight  and   the    best   technical    information. 
Timber  sales  are  now  made  with  strict  attention  to  the  welfare  of  the 
forest,  and  at  stumpage  prices  often  decidedly  in  advance  of  the  market. 

TCE   RESERVES   BKU-SOSTAIKI* 

The  income  from  the  reserves  is  as  yet  but  a  small  fraction  of  what 
may  be  expected  as  they  approach  full  utilization.     Yet  their  admi 
tration  is  already  on  a  sound  busi  :  only  are  they  meet- 

in  «r  from  their  receipts  a  very  large  part  of  the  cost  of  their  main- 
tenance: thev  are  even  now  beginning  to  show  a  decided  decrease  in 
net  expense  to  the  Government.  My  estimate  of  the  appropriation 
necessary  to  meet  the  general  expenses  of  the  Forest  Service  is  I-  -- 
by  $100,000  than  the  appropriation  of  last  year,  notwithstanding  that 
the  total  area  of  the  i  has  been  substantially  enlarged  by  E: 

tive  action,  that  increasing  use  necessitates  greater  expense  of  admin- 
istration, and  that  in  general  the  work  of  the  Service  is  growing  very 
rapidly.     Though  the  administration  of  tl.  -      rmsbutapai 

the  field  of  work,  it  may  confidently  be  expected  that  within  rr 
from  the  transfer  of  the  reserves  to  this  Department  the  Fore-t  Serv- 
ice will  cost  the  taxpayer  nothing  whatever. 

In  reaching  this  result  no  unjust  burden  will  have  been  laid  on 

est     As  public  property  the  National  f<  mid  yield  to  the 

public  a  reasonable  return  for  whatever  of  value  private  individuals 

re  from  them  for  their  own  profit.     In  accordance  with  this  prin- 
ciple, applicants  for  special  privile.  rights   of  way.  i 

wer-house    site-,   and   similar  concessions— have   been   called 
upon  to  pay  for  such  privileges  on  the  b;:  eir  commercial  value. 

example,  in  the  case  of  water  powers  duly  located  under  the  State 
laws,  but  which  can  not  be  developed  without  the  y  of  re- 

land,  besides  a  charge  for  the  land  occupk 

-t  land,  a  small  charge  per  unit  of  power  developed  is  made,  not 

the  use  of  the  water  itself,  which  is  granted  directly  by  tl 
but  for  the  tion  of  the  supply  which  the  preservation  of  the 

forests  furnishes,   and  which,   were  it   not  for  the  existence  of  the 

rve,  the  water-right  owner  could  secure  only  by  himself  acquir- 
ing great  bodies  of  forest  land.     Suchacharg  ssentially  similar 


REPORT    OF   THE    SECRETARY,  63 

to  the  charge  for  stock  grazed  upon  the  reserves.     It  is  a  return  for 

actual  value  received,  and  throws  upon  those  who  profit  by  public 

control  of  the  reserves  a  -hare  of  the  cost  of  maintaining  that  control. 

By  the  wise  and  just  provision  of  Congress  in   enacting  at  its  last 

on  that  10  per  cent  of  the  gross  receipts  from  the  National  reserves 
shall  be  made  over  to  the  several  States  in  which  they  are  situated,  for 
the  benefit  of  the  counties  which  would  otherwise  receive  no  revenue 
from  a  part  of  their  area,  a  real  grievance  was  redressed.  Even  with 
the  present  use  of  the  reserves  the  benefits  thus  reaped  from  them  by 
the  communities  in  their  neighborhood  are  of  substantial  importance. 
As  time  goes  on  the  importance  of  this  provision  will  increase,  and 
eventually  the  counties  will  find  themselves  far  better  off  than  they 
would  have  been  without  the  reserves,  for  private  ownership  followed 
by  exploitation  would  have  destroyed  the  sources  of  revenue  by  leav- 
ing little  or  nothing  of  permanent  taxable  value,  whereas  now  every 
resource  is  conserved  and  will  be  made  to  pay  its  just  share  of  income. 
Since  the  fundamental  purpose  for  which  reserves  exist  is  to  secure 
the  best  permanent  use  of  all  resources,  their  effect  is  to  add  to  prop- 
erty value,  and  by  turning  over  10  per  cent  of  their  gross  receipt.-  to 
local  use  they  will  contribute  far  more  to  the  local  public  needs  than 
the  taxes  they  would  pay  if  they  were  private  property. 

Protection  of  the  reserves  from  tire  has  been  the  most  important 
task  laid  upon  the  Forest  Service.  It  is  cause  for  congratulation  that 
the  loss  by  tire  during  the  year  was  so  .slight.  Indeed,  the  saving 
which  resulted  from  the  organized  care  of  the  reserve  force  was 
undoubtedly  worth  more  than  the  whole  cost  of  administering  the 
reserves.  Only  about  eight  tires  of  any  consequence  occurred  on  the 
reserves  during  the  calendar  year  1905,  a  season  of  extreme  dryness 
and  one  in  which  under  ordinary  circumstances  the  damage  from  tires 
should  have  been  unusually  large.  This  small  number  was  due  in  large 
part  to  the  system  of  patrol,  which  leads  to  the  discovery  of  tires 
before  much  damage  has  been  done.  So  far  during  the  calendar  year 
1906  the  damage  from  tire  has  been  extremely  small,  even  in  compari- 
son with  that  in  1905.  Increased  efficiency  of  the  patrol  system,  com- 
bined with  favorable  climatic  conditions,  has  led  to  this  favorable 
result. 

WORK    OF    THE    YEAR. 

FOEE-T    MANAGEMENT. 

The  progress  made  by  the  Forest  Service  in  the  brief  period  of 
seventeen  months,  during  which  it  has  had  charge  of  the  reserves,  in 
introducing  management  upon  a  vast  field  of  operations  in  virgin 
forests  of  varied  types,  compares  favorably  with  anything  that  the 
history  of  fore-try  can  show  in  any  country.  From  Minnesota  to 
southern  California  and  from  Washington  to   New  Mexico,   reserve 


64  TEAEBOOK    OF    I  HE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTV 

timber  is  now  being  cut  under  regulations  looking  to  a  second  crop. 
With  larger  the  method-  now  applied  will  doubtless  be 

found  faulty  in  some  respects,  and  with  opportunity  for  more 
intensive  use  which  the  rising  value  of  timber  will  afford,  much  more 
-   tisfacl  Its  will  be  possible;   but  tho  important  fact  is  that, 

confronted  with  a  problem  of  unexampled  magnitude  in  its  kind,  the 
roved  able  to  substitute  conservative  for  destructive 
.  while  greatly  increasing  the  use  itself. 
Live  timber  i<  cut  on   the  reserves  under  stipulations  on 

actual  study  of  the  forest  condition-  to  protect  the  forest  and  the 
water  supply  from  injury.     Piling-  of  the  waste  left  by  logging  is 
always  required,  a  diameter  limit  is  set  to  prevent  too  heavy  cutting. 
-    ire  left  where  necessary  to  provide  for  reproduction,  full 
utilization  of  all  salable  material  i>  compelled,  and  young  growth  i- 
bed  from  injury.     All  this  the  purchaser  is  under  contract  to 
perform,  under  the  >rirerv;-ion  of  the  forest  officers,  who  are  held  to 
efficiency  by  systematic  inspection.     Yet  in   spite  of  these  require- 
ments, which    -lightly  reduce  the  profits  of   lumbering  to  the  pur- 
.    -     .    record  stumpage  prices  have  often  been    obtained,  and  the 
average  pri  -         □  far  above  that  u-ually  paid  in  the 

same  regions.  Living  trees  to  be  cut  are  marked  beforehand  by 
the  forest  officers,  who  also  scale  the  lumber  before  it  is  removed. 

Though  some  large  ^ales  of  timber  have  been  made  in  regions  where 
great  quantities  of  mature  forest  were  available  and  exposed  to  dete- 
rioration, the  constant  policy  has  be      I        icourage  the  -mall  user. 

-.  in  more  than  99  cases  out  of  every  100 
the  sale-  were  of  less  than  5  million  board  feet. 

le  of  timber  on  th        -       es  were  nearly  r'i 
while  the  contra       -       -  of  the  year  reach  a  total  of  o- 
Five  years  i-  the  longest  period  allowed  under  these  contracts  in  which 
to  cut  the  timber  sold.     Timber  which  can  be  harvested  with  profit 
only  by  large  operations  and  with  a  heavy  outlay  for  the  construction 
of  a  milling  plant  or  means  of  transportation,  or  both,  must  neci  ss  - 
rily  be  -old  under  a  contract  extending  over  several  years:  but  no 
sales         made  permitting  the  speculative  holding  of  timber  again.-t  a 
. 
The  la:  _    -  jales         States  in  S   nth  Dakota  (73  mil- 

lion board  feet),   Wyoming  (71  million  feet),  and    M  er  53 

million  feet).     In  the  latter  two   Si   '   9   heavy  lodgepole  pine  foj 
are  ready  for  the  ax,  but  difficult  to  lumber  from  their  inaccessibility. 
Attn  -  tmand  for  lodgepole  pine  raili 

opened  a  market  for  this  timber  and  made  it  post  3ell  by  large 

tracts  under  conditions  which  will  permit  a  second  cutting  after 
thirty  or  forty  yen-.     In   South  Dakota  a  special  reason  exists  for 
of  timber  with  the  utmost  energy.     By  the  ravages 


BEPOET    OF    THE    SECBETABY.  65 

of  a  bark  beetle  great  quantities  of  timber  are  being  destroyed,  and 
the  annihilation  of  the  entire  forest  of  the  region  is  threatened.  Only 
by  extensive  cutting  of  infested  trees  can  the  spread  of  the  beetles  be 
checked  and  the  damaged  timber  be  utilized. 

In  Colorado  and  Arizona  sales  of  timber  totaled  over  27  million 
board  feet  for  each  State,  and  in  Utah  and  California  over  10  million. 
In  Colorado  and  Utah  these  sales  were  mainly  of  tire-killed  tin: 
largely  used  in  mining.  In  Arizona  large  quantities  of  mature 
accessible  timber  permitted  extensive  cutting  without  injury  to  the 
forest.  In  other  States  cutting  was  comparatively  insignificant  in 
amount,  save  in  Idaho,  where  nearly  9  million  feet  were  cut. 

Little  difficulty  was  experienced  in  preventing  timber  trespass  upon 
the  reserves.  Where  .-ueh  trespass  occurred  the  full  value  of  the 
timber  taken  was  recovered.  Practically  no  loss  was  sustained  from 
theft. 

COOPERATIVE    MAXAGEMEXT. 

The  Forest  Service  continues  to  receive  application-  from  private 
owners  for  as-istance  in  introducing  forest  management  upon  their 
holdings.  So  far  as  possible  the  Forest  Service  will  give  aid  in  this 
work  as  in  the  past,  since  it  is  plainly  in  the  public  interest  to  promote 
the  practice  of  fore-try  among  private  owners  on  business  principles. 
It  is  significant  that  while  at  the  first  it  was  necessary  to  prepare  a 
working  plan  for  every  timber  tract  before  recommendations  for  con- 
servative management  could  lie  made,  during  the  past  year,  out  of  o-t 
timber  tract-  examined,  it  was  pos-ible  on  43  to  outline  at  once  a  sys- 
tem of  management  and  the  regulations  to  put  it  into  effect.  Working 
plans  were  made  during  the  year  for  6  large  tracts  in  New  York, 
Kentucky.  Michigan,  and  South  Carolina,  and  for  100  woodlots  in  16 
States. 

In  the  woodlot  work,  which  assists  small  owners,  particularly  farm- 
er-, to  make  the  best  use  of  their  woodland,  special  attention  was 
given  to  the  Middle  West.  Very  different  problems  are  here  pre- 
.-ented  from  those  of  the  Eastern  State-,  hitherto  the  main  field  of 
woodlot  study.  As  the  need  of  timber  becomes  more  pressing,  the 
yield  from  these  small  forest  areas,  which  nevertheless  in  the  aggregate 
form  a  large  part  of  our  total  woodland  area,  will  become  increasingly 
important.  On  the  whole,  the  farmer  knows  how  to  utilize  his  wood- 
land far  less  intelligently  than  any  other  part  of  his  farm.  If  he'  can 
be  brought  to  an  early  realization  of  the  future  value  of  good  timber 
and  knowledge  of  how  to  grow  it.  great  benefit  will  result,  both  to  the 
farmer  and  to  the  community,  which  later  will  stand  in  need  of  every 
available  supply. 

Cooperative  forest  studies  were  carried  on  during  the  year  with 
the  States  of  California.  New  Hampshire,  and  North  Carolina;  with  the 
Office  of   Indian  Affiiir>  of   the   Department  of  the   Interior,  on  the 

3    a  1906 5 


66  YEAKBOOK    OF   THE   DEPABTMENT   OP   AGBICT7LTUEE. 

Wisconsin  Indian  Reservation;  with  the  War  Department,  on  the  mili- 
tary reservation  in  New  Mexico;  and  with  the  Hydrographie  Division 
of  the  United  States  Geological  Survey,  upon  the  Potomac  River 
watershed.  Tie  production  in  Wisconsin  and  Minnesota,  in  coopera- 
tion with  the  Northern  Pacific  Railroad,  and  the  effect  of  sulphur  fumes 
from  smelters  on  neighboring  forests  in  Tennessee,  in  cooperation 
with  private  forest  owners  and  with  the  Bureaus  of  Chemistry  and 
Entomology,  were  also  studied. 

FOREST    EXTENSION. 

The  field  of  forest  planting  in  the  United  States  broadens  with 
every  year.  In  the  East  the  economic  conditions  are  bringing  rapidly 
nearer  intensive  forest  management,  which  will  involve  extensive 
planting,  both  to  stock  the  land  fully  and  to  shorten  the  interval 
between  crops.  In  the  Middle  West  the  rising  value  of  lumber  is 
tending  to  make  the  growing  of  trees  profitable  on  land  now  in  pas- 
ture or  under  the  plow.  Knowledge  gained  by  past  investigations  of 
how  to  make  trees  grow  under  adverse  conditions  opens  enlarged 
possibilities  to  private  owners  in  the  more  arid  parts  of  the  far 
West.  By  far  the  most  important  part  of  the  field,  however,  is  that 
of  reserve  planting.  Here  in  the  future  a  gigantic  task  will  be  pre- 
sented, upon  which  the  Forest  Service  has  already  begun  a  prelimi- 
nary attack.  Planting  wiil  furnish  a  future  timber  supply,  improve 
drainage  basin-,  and  replace  inferior  species  with  more  valuable  trees. 
Of  the  107,000,000  acres  of  reserves  enormous  areas  are  partly  or 
wholly  unforested. 

In  the  Middle  West  alone  are  5  reserves,  aggregating  over  750,000 
acres,  which  are  practically  treeless  and  on  which  planting  is  now 
under  way.  Doubtless  future  additions  to  the  reserves  will  .still  fur- 
ther increase  the  task.  While  some  of  this  land  may  never  support 
trees,  the  public  welfare  will  eventually  demand  that  the  larger  part 
of  it  be  forested.  Unaided  natural  reproduction  can  never  accom- 
plish the  task  in  time.  As  the  need  for  wood  and  water  increases, 
planting  on  a  scale  as  3Tet  entirely  unthought  of  in  this  or  any  other 
country  will  be  carried  on. 

For  private  planting  the  two  most  serious  obstacles  to  widespread 
activity  are  the  high  cost  and  the  poor  quality  of  both  the  nursery 
stock  and  the  tree  seeds  now  commercially  obtainable.  In  some  cases 
eastern  tree  planters  have  been  compelled  to  import  from  Europe 
nursery  stock  of  American  trees,  and  adulterated  seeds  are  common 
on  the  market.  It  is  not  possible  for  the  Forest  Service  to  suppl}r 
nursery  stock  for  private  use,  but  it  is  doing  what  it  can  to  aid  the 
planter  by  tests  pf  the  purity  and  germinative  powers  of  seeds  fur- 
nished by  different  dealers,  and  by  information  as  to  prices  at  which 
seeds  and  stock  may  be  obtained  in  different  regions. 


EEPOET    OF    THE    SECEETASY.  67 

For  planting  on  the  reserves  the  Forest  Service  must  raise  its  own 
material.  Six  planting  stations  are  now  established,  with  an  annual 
capacity  of  6,000,000  seedlings.  Yet  to  plant  1  square  mile  requires 
more  than  700.000  seedlings.  Though  four  years  have  passed  since 
the  first  nursery  station  was  established,  the  work  as  yet  done  has 
been  hardly  more  than  experimental,  and  in  the  newer  nurseries  few 
of  the  seedlings  are  old  enough  to  plant  out.  To  meet  the  needs  of 
the  reserves,  preparations  for  planting  must  be  made  on  a  vastly 
greater  scale. 

As  a  first  step,  nursery  sites  will  be  established  at  rangers*  head- 
quarters on  all  the  reserves.  As  rapidly  as  possible  the  reserve  force 
will  be  traiued  to  carry  on  this  work,  and  nursery  stations  will  be 
multiplied. 

The  real  progress  made  toward  reserve  planting  appears  not  in  the 
number  of  trees  set  out  or  the  present  capacity  of  the  stations,  but  in 
the  fact  that  practical  methods  of  doing  the  work  at  reasonable  cost 
have  been  found.  In  spite  of  the  high  cost  of  labor  in  this  country, 
an  acre  of  land  can  now  under  ordinary  conditions  be  planted  to  forest 
by  the  Service  almost  as  cheaply  as  the  same  work  is  done  in  Ger- 
man.}-. The  whole  problem  of  successful  forest  planting  under  the 
conditions  of  aridity,  elevation,  lack  of  transportation  facilities,  and 
scarcity  of  labor,  combined  with  the  lack  of  an}-  experience  which 
could  guide  to  right  action,  was  one  of  extreme  difficulty.  Though 
much  yet  remains  to  be  done  before  a  perfected  system  of  planting- 
will  have  been  secured,  the  work  now  done  amounts  to  a  demon- 
stration that  success  is  within  reach.  This  in  itself  is  no  small 
achievement. 

COOPERATIVE    PLANTING. 

The  Forest  Service  cooperate^  with  private  owners  to  secure  forest 
extension  by  preparing  planting  plans  for  them.  Two  years  ago  the 
average  size  of  the  planting  plans  made  was  68  acres.  Last  year  it 
was  310  acres.  This  is  significant  of  changing  conditions.  Increas- 
ingly as  the  necessity  of  provision  for  the  future  needs  becomes  plain, 
large  owners  are  seeking  the  cooperation  of  the  Service.  A  number 
of  railroads  have  begun  to  plan  for  tie  production  from  planted  tim- 
ber: coal  companies  are  preparing  to  utilize  waste  land,  and  cities  are 
seeking  to  improve  their  watersheds  and  at  the  same  time  derive  a 
revenue  from  the  land  held  for  watershed  protection. 

Examinations  were  made  of  over  300.000  acres  on  which  the  owners 
wish  to  consider  planting,  and  detailed  planting  plans  were  made  for 
over  10,000  acres  in  li'  States. 

Cooperation  with  other  Departments,  by  the  preparation  of  planting 
plans,  included  the  War  Department,  the  Bureau  of  Fisheries  of  the 
Department  of  Commerce  and  Labor,  and  the  Reclamation  Service  of 
the  Department  of  the  Interior. 


68  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

DENDROLOGY. 

The  investigation  of  turpentining  methods  was  pushed  along  lines 
which  promise  important  economic  results  by  diminishing  the  wound 
inflicted  on  the  tree  and  greatly  prolonging  the  period  during  which  a 
tract  may  be  worked.  A  chemical  study  of  the  turpentine  from  differ- 
ent specie^  of  pines  (conducted  in  cooperation  with  the  University  of 
North  Carolina)  is  under  way  to  learn  which  specie-  furnish  the  most 
valuable  yield. 

Studies  of  forest  distribution  and  resources  were  continued.  The 
experimental  basket-willow  holts  demonstrated  the  success  of  the  cul- 
tural methods  advocated  by  the  Service  by  producing  a  crop  of  rods  of 
the  finest  quality.  Analyses  of  willow  barks  established  their  value 
for  use  in  tanning.  By  the  identification  of  many  samples  of  woods 
valuable  information  was  furnished  wood  user-. 

FOREST    PRODUCTS. 

An  important  means  of  reducing  the  drain  upon  our  forests  is  the 
treatment  of  wood  by  seasoning,  by  the  use  of  chemicals,  or  by  both 
combined,  to  make  it  last  longer.  Careful  experiments  are  under  way 
to  determine  the  most  effective  and  economical  methods  of  treating 
railroad  ties,  telephone  and  telegraph  poles  and  cross  arms,  and  fence 
posts.  Material  cut  at  different  times  of  the  year,  seasoned  at  differ- 
ent times  of  the  year,  and  by  different  methods,  and  treated  by  differ- 
ent processes  is  being  tested  in  service  to  find  out  how  it  can  be  made 
most  durable. 

Wood  distillation  to  utilize  the  waste  product  of  lumbering,  and  the 
lability  of  untried  woods  for  making  paper  pulp,  were  made  the 
subjects  of  s]  studies. 

Over  12,  0  tests  of  the  strength  of  timber  were  made.  The  woods 
tested  include  loblolly  pine,  red  fir,  western  hemlock.  Norway  pine, 
tamarack,  white  and  red  oak.  and  eucalyptus.  By  these  tests,  which 
show  the  suitability  of  the  various  kinds  of  wood  for  different  uses, 
bo;h  timber-land  owners  and  those  who  employ  wood  in  building  and 
manufacturing  have  received  great  benefit.  New  woods  have  been 
brought  into  use  and  economy  in  the  use  of  material  has  been  pro- 
moted. The  present  facilities  for  this  work  are  inadequate,  and  it  is 
important  that  a  special  laboratory  be  provided  at  Washington. 

By  statistical  study  of  the  production  and  consumption  of  lumber 
in  various  forms  and  compilation  of  the  various  grading  rules  now  in 
information  greatly  desired  by  the  lumber  trade  but  never  before 
obtainable  was  gathered,  better  conditions  were  promoted,  and  light 
was  thrown  on  the  highly  important  question  of  the  probable  duration 
of  the  country's  lumber  supply.  Special  studies  of  the  manufacture 
of  cooperage  stock,  of  vehicle^  and  implement-,  and  of  boxes,  and  of 
certain  kiln-drying  method-,  gave  results  of  decided  value  both  to  the 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  69 

manufacturers  and  to  timber-land  owners.  Wood  as  a  paving  mate- 
rial was  also  studied,  and  experiments  were  started  to  discover  the  best 
kinds  of  wood  to  use  and  how  they  should  be  treated  and  laid. 

BUREAU  OF  CHEMISTRY. 

The  activities  of  the  Bureau  of  Chemistry  during-  the  year  included 
a  great  variety  of  investigations. 

EXAMINATION    OF   BUTTER,  MILK,  AND    CREAM. 

More  than  800  samples  of  butter  were  investigated,  to  see  if  they 
complied  with  the  requirements  of  the  law  relating  to  renovated 
butter.  A  study  of  the  effects  of  cold  storage  upon  the  chemical  com- 
position of  milk  and  cream  was  inaugurated,  to  determine  the  length 
of  time  during  which  such  products  can  be  safely  kept  in  cold  storage. 

CEREAL    INVESTIGATIONS. 

The  effect  of  environment  upon  the  content  of  sugar  in  Indian  sweet 
corn  was  studied.  The  almost  universal  use  of  sweet  corn  for  food 
throughout  the  country  renders  such  an  investigation  of  peculiar  inter- 
est to  consumers  as  well  as  to  producers.  A  single  variety  of  seed  was 
planted  in  different  localities  from  South  Carolina  to  Maine,  and  the 
quantity  of  sugar  in  the  product  was  carefully  determined.  At  the 
same  time  meteorological  data  were  secured  which  are  utilized  in 
determining  the  effect  of  environment  in  all  of  its  factors  upon  the 
composition  of  the  product.  It  was  found  that  within  twenty-four 
hours  after  harvest,  if  exposed  to  ordinary  temperatures,  a  very  con- 
siderable percentage  of  the  sugar  has  disappeared  from  the  grains  of 
the  corn.  This  fact  has  led  to  the  observation  that  it  is  necessary  to 
market  the  product  as  soon  as  possible  after  harvest,  and  meanwhile 
to  keep  it  at  as  low  a  temperature  as  can  be  secured. 

Studies  looking  to  the  improvement  of  the  different  varieties  of 
Indian  corn,  by  selection  based  upon  analytical  data,  were  under- 
taken. These  studies  are  a  continuation  of  those  conducted  the  pre- 
ceding year  upon  the  effect  of  environment  on  the  chemical  composi- 
tion of  the  sugar  beet.  In  all,  over  3, GOO  analyses  were  made  of  cere- 
als in  the  prosecution  of  the  above  investigations.  These  investiga- 
tions also  include  the  effect  of  environment  upon  the  chemical  compo- 
sition of  barley  as  related  to  the  brewing  industries. 

STUDY    OF    DENATURED    ALCOHOL. 

An  important  investigation  was  also  begun  upon  the  economic  pro- 
duction of  alcohol  from  various  raw  materials  in  relation  to  the  pro- 
duction of  denatured  alcohol  for  industrial  purposes.  The  object  of 
this  investigation  was  to  discover  the  value  of  various  waste  materials 


70  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

of  factories — wood,  molasses,  sweet  potatoes,  cornstalks,  etc. — in  the 
production  of  alcohol  for  denaturing.  This  work  is  likely  to  prove 
of  great  value  to  our  farmers  in  developing  new  sources  of  income 
from  the  production  of  denatured  alcohol  for  industrial  purposes. 

TESTING    OF    SUPPLIES    FURNISHED    UNDER    CONTRACT. 

In  the  Contracts  Laboratory,  the  object  of  which  is  the  examination 
of  materials  furnished  to  the  different  Departments  of  the  Govern- 
ment under  contract,  69  samples  were  examined  for  the  War  Depart- 
ment, 19  for  the  Navy  Department,  65  for  the  Department  of  the 
Interior,  36  for  the  Treasury,  73  for  the  Post-Office,  1  for  the  Depart- 
ment of  Commerce  and  Labor,  73  for  the  Government  Printing  Office, 
and  59  for  the  Department  of  Agriculture.  These  examinations  were 
of  the  most  rigid  character,  and  the  result  of  the  work  has  been  to 
secure  a  much  higher  quality  of  material  than  was  formerly  supplied 
under  the  contract  system. 

EXAMINATION    OF    DRUGS. 

The  examination  of  drugs  has  been  particularly  fruitful  during  the 
year.  Five  hundred  and  fifty-three  samples  were  examined  for  purity 
and  quality.  A  large  part  of  the  work  of  the  Drug  Laboratory  has 
been  in  connection  with  the  Post-Office  Department  for  the  purpose  of 
suppressing  traffic  in  fraudulent  preparations  transmitted  through  the 
mails.  As  the  result  of  these  investigations  a  large  number  of  fraud 
orders  have  been  issued  forbidding  the  use  of  the  mails  for  such  pur- 
poses. Other  important  investigations  were  undertaken  in  the  testing 
of  chemical  reagents,  of  oils  and  essences,  and  of  plant  drugs. 

ANALYSIS    OF    WATERS.    INSECTICIDES,  AND    CATTLE    FOODS. 

The  examination  of  waters  used  as  beverages  has  been  continued, 
and  also  the  analysis  of  waters  used  for  irrigation.  Thirty-nine  sam- 
ples of  insecticides  were  investigated  during  the  year.  Studies  were 
made  also  of  the  lime-sulphur-salt  wash  and  allied  mixtures.  One 
hundred  and  fifty-four  samples  of  cattle  food  were  analyzed  to  deter- 
mine the  quality  of  the  cattle  foods  sold  upon  the  markets.  Studies 
were  also  made  of  the  injurious  effects  of  fumes  from  smelters  upon 
vegetation,  and  testimony  was  given  in  the  courts  relating  thereto.  It 
is  evident  that  the  sulphurous  acid  fumes  produced  in  most  smelters 
are  of  a  character  to  injure  vegetation  and  also  animal  health  in  a 
region  very  widely  extended  about  the  factory.  It  appears  probable 
that  in  the  near  future  smelters  will  be  required  to  convert  the  sul- 
phurous acid  into  sulphuric  acid  or  some  other  substance  which  will 
not  cause  the  injuries  above  mentioned. 


REPORT    OP    THE    SECRETARY.  71 

STUDY    OF    TANNING    MATERIALS,  PArER,  AND    TURPENTINE. 

The  study  of  tanning-  materials  was  continued,  especiall}T  of  the 
Sicilian  sumacs.  The  effects  of  different  tanning  materials  upon  the 
character,  qualit}*,  and  durability  of  leather  were  investigated.  Inves- 
tigations of  great  importance,  not  only  to  the  various  Departments  of 
the  Government  but  to  the  people  in  general,  are  those  relating  to  the 
character  of  paper  used  for  public  records.  Investigations  have  been 
continued  respecting  the  composition  of  turpentine  distilled  from  wood 
and  its  relations  to  the  ordinary  turpentine. 

FOOD    INSPECTION. 

The  food  and  drugs  act,  June  30,  1906,  imposes  upon  the  Depart- 
ment additional  duties  of  a  most  important  character.  The  two  chief 
purposes  kept  in  view  by  this  act  throughout  all  its  sections  are,  first, 
to  prevent  the  introduction  of  any  injurious  or  debasing  substance  into 
foods  or  drugs,  and,  second,  to  secure  the  correct  labeling  of  all  food 
and  drug  products.  This  act  applies  to  all  interstate  and  foreign 
commerce  in  all  foods  and  drugs,  and  also  to  all  imported  meat  food 
products.  The  proper  enforcement  of  this  act  must  prove  of  immense 
benefit  to  all  the  people  of  this  country  in  securing  freedom  from  adul- 
teration and  fraud.  Regulations  providing  for  the  administration  of 
the  law  have  been  carefully  prepared,  and  30.000  copies  have  been 
distributed  throughout  the  country. 

The  inspection  of  imported  foods  at  the  ports  of  entry  has  been 
extended,  especially  at  New  York,  Boston,  and  Philadelphia.  The 
earthquake  and  fire  at  San  Francisco  in  April  unfortunately  destroyed 
our  laboratory  at  that  port.  It  is  hoped  that  this  enforced  suspension, 
however,  will  not  be  of  long  duration. 

Five  thousand  seven  hundred  and  forty-nine  samples  of  imported 
food  products  were  examined  during  the  fiscal  year.  Of  the  1.246 
samples  which  were  found  not  to  comply  with  the  law,  531  were 
released  without  prejudice  because  it  was  evident  that  no  intent 
to  defraud  or  deceive  the  people  of  the  country  existed;  577  were 
admitted  after  being  relabeled  so  as  to  comply  with  the  provisions  of 
the  law;  138  invoices  were  required  to  be  reshipped  beyond  the  juris- 
diction of  the  United  States.  In  addition  to  the  above  number  of 
samples,  8,735  inspections  were  made  upon  the  floors  of  the  appraisers 
stores. 

The  effect  of  the  food-inspection  law  on  foreign  commerce  has  been 
most  salutary.  In  many  cases  kinds  of  food  products  which  were 
formerly  very  generally  misbranded  are  now  found  to  be  almost  uni- 
versally free  of  suspicion.  There  has  been  a  very  decided  improve- 
ment in  the  qualit}r  of  imported  food  products,  due  to  inspection. 


,  '2  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

food  STrr: 

The  Division  of  Foods  has  also  conducted  special  investigations  into 
at  of  domestic  adulteration  of  food  products  and  an  investiga- 
tion of  tropical  and  subtropical  fruits,  as  well  as  of  fruits  of  domestic 
|  i    taction. 

A  very  extensive  investigation  made  to  determine  the  character  of 
distilled  liquors,  both  those  imported  into  the  United  States  and  those 
of  domestic  manufacture,  has  been  practically  completed. 

The  study  ot  the  effects  of  colors,  preservatives,  and  other  sub- 
stance- added  to  foods  has  been  continued  during  the  year,  and  most 
valuable  data  relating  thereto  are  now  being  prepared  for  publication. 
This  investigation  is  particularly  valuable  because  the  experiments 
are  made  upon  human  be' 

MICROSCOPIC    WORK. 

T^e  microscope  has  become  one  of  the  most  valuable  adjuncts  in  the 
lination  of  food  products  and  materials  used  for  technic-al  pur- 

-  -.  Micro-chemical  investigations  have  been  largely  made  in  the 
work  of  the  Bureau  of  Chemistry  and  have  extended  not  only  to 
foods  but  also  to  leathers,  papers,  tanning  materials,  and  bacteriolog- 
ical examinations.  The  total  number  of  samples  examined  during  the 
year  was  I.     The  bacterio-chemical  work  has  been   of  extreme 

importance.  Thi^  is  especially  true  in  connection  with  the  work 
authorized  by  Congress  on  the  effects  of  cold  storage  upon  wholesome- 
ness  of  food  products.  Particularly  in  investigating  the  relative 
merits  of  drawn  and  undrawn  fowls  when  placed  in  cold  storage,  the 
bacterio-chemioal  examination  is  of  vital  importance.  Studies  have 
fore  been  made  to  determine  whether  the  bacteria  of  the  intesti- 
nal tract  migrate  to  the  fle>h  of  the  fowl  during  the  period  of  cold 
-torage.  and.  if  so.  what  chemical  changes  are  produced  thereby. 
The  bacterio-chemical  investigations  have  extended  to  a  large  number 
of  other  Eurticularly  to  the  chemical  changes  which  take 

place  in  milk,  cream,  and  evaporated  and  condensed  milks,  and  to  the 
g  teral  changes  of  a  bacterial  character  which  foods  undergo  on 
keeping. 

BUREAU  OF  SOILS. 

Underlying  all  attempts  to  improve  the  general  agricultural  welfare 
of  the  country  lies  the  necessity  for  a  correct  knowledge  of  the  char- 
acter and  variety  of  its  -  -.  ^uch  knowledge  is  fundamental,  and 
without  it  no  grc  -  can  be  made  in  securing  further  diver-iri- 

ps,tbe  introduction  of  new  crops,  or  the  more  economical 
production  of  the  great  staples  now  known. 


EEPOET    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  73 

THE    SOIL    SURVEY. 

Since  1899  the  Bureau  of  Soils  has  been  conducting  an  investigation 
of  the  soils  of  the  United  States  which  will  ultimately  result  in  a 
thorough  familiarity  with  the  vast,  varied,  and  but  partially  appre- 
ciated soil  resources  of  the  country.  The  purpose  of  this  work  is 
to  ascertain  the  variety  and  extent  of  the  chief  characteristic  soils  of 
the  country,  to  determine  the  crop  or  crops  which  can  be  raised  to  the 
best  advantage  upon  each  of  these  soils,  and  to  discover  what  pecul- 
iarities of  soil  management  are  best  suited  to  secure  the  maximum 
results  on  each  soil  in  different  and  widely  separated  localities. 

EXTENT   OF   THE    SURVEYS. 

During  the  fiscal  year  1900  soil  surveys  covering  19,311  square 
miles,  or  12,370,210  acres,  were  made  in  29  States  and  2  Territories. 
In  all,  to  June  30,  1906,  251  different  surveys  have  been  made  in  13 
States  and  1  Territories,  covering  a  total  area  of  118,687  square  miles, 
or  75,959,680  acres.  These  surveys  have  covered  not  only  a  wide 
range  of  soil  and  climatic  conditions,  but  also  the  typical  soils  upon 
which  the  chief  staple  crops  as  well  as  many  new  and  special  crops  are 
being  produced. 

THE    PROBLEMS    ENCOUNTERED. 

The  work  of  the  soil  survey  in  1906  and  in  preceding  years,  while 
dealing  chiefly  with  the  characteristic  soils  upon  which  the  staple 
crops — corn,  wheat,  cotton,  grass,  etc.- — are  produced  in  different  sec- 
tions and  under  different  conditions  of  soil  and  climate,  has  also 
encountered  rnamx  specific  problems  of  wide  interest  and  application. 
The  opening  of  large  areas  for  agricultural  occupation  has  necessitated 
in  several  States  a  stud}T  of  the  existing  soil  t}Tpes  in  order  that  the 
appropriate  crops  for  production  upon  each  might  be  determined. 
The  widespread  interest  in  the  agricultural  capabilities  of  undrained 
lands  in  many  sections  has  led  to  demands  for  surveys  which  shall 
determine  the  character  of  crops  to  which  such  soils  may  be  farmed 
after  reclamation.  The  breaking  up  of  large  dry-farmed  ranches  for 
more  intensive  forms  of  agriculture  under  irrigation  has  also  neces- 
sitated surveys  which  could  be  used  as  a  basal  guide  in  crop  selection. 
The  extension  of  crops  like  tobacco  and  alfalfa  into  entirely  new  areas 
whose  soil  adaptations  were  formerly  unknown  has  been  made  possible 
by  the  soil  surveys.  The  introduction  of  new  crops  has  been  accom- 
plished along  the  lines  suggested  by  the  surveys.  One  of  the  chief 
purposes  and  uses  of  the  surve}Ts  has  been  to  aid  individual  farmers 
in  the  selection  of  land  suited  to  general  or  special  crops  in  regions 
unknown  or  but  partly  known. 


74  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


TITE    SOIL    RESOURCES    OF    THE    COUNTRY. 


In  the  work  of  the  soil  survey,  since  its  inception  in  1899,  461  dis- 
tinct types  of  soils  have  been  encountered.  Some  of  these  types 
are  of  great  extent,  covering  areas  measured  by  thousands  of  square 
miles.  Still  others  are  of  local  extent  and  distribution.  Some  arc 
distributed  over  a  considerable  range  of  climatic  environment.  Others 
are  so  restricted  that  they  may  be  said  to  lie  in  a  single  climatic  belt. 
The  great  striking  fact,  however,  is  that  with  such  a  great  variety  of 
individual  soils  onl\*  about  a  dozen  important  crops  are  now  produced 
in  the  entire  country.  Again,  the  same  crop  is  produced  with  the 
greatest  diversity  of  success  or  failure  upon  a  great  variety  of  soils,  to 
some  of  which  the  crop  is  well  suited  while  upon  others  it  is  annually 
produced  at  a  loss.  Before  the  farmers  of  all  sections  of  the  United 
States  can  reduce  agriculture  to  a  basis  of  permanent  business  success 
the  knowledge  of  these  facts  must  be  thoroughly  disseminated  and 
fully  understood. 

It  has  been  found  that  in  addition  to  the  broad  subdivision  of  the 
country  into  a  humid  region,  an  arid  region,  and  a  rather  indefinite 
semiarid  region,  there  are  at  least  thirteen  grand  divisions  among  the 
soils  which  may  be  termed  soil  provinces.  The  soils  of  the  Atlantic 
and  Gulf  Coastal  Plains  differ  materially  from  those  of  the  Piedmont 
Plateau.  The  soils  of  the  glaciated  region  of  the  Northern  States  are 
materially  different  from  those  of  the  limestone  valleys,  and  from  the 
alluvial  bottom  lands  or  the  residual  prairies  of  the  Western  States. 
Still  greater  differences  exist  between  the  soils  of  the  Pacific  coast 
valleys  or  the  Great  Interior  Basin  and  those  of  the  Eastern  State 
provinces.  All  of  these  differences  have  their  deep  significance  in  the 
selection  of  crops  and  in  the  management  of  the  soils.  Even  within 
single  provinces  there  are  groups  of  soils  which  differ  profoundly 
from  all  others,  and  these  differences  must  be  recognized  and  their 
crop  signification  understood.  Each  series  also  ranges  from  the  coars- 
est sandy  and  gravelly  types  or  individuals  to  the  finest-grained  clays. 
No  two  of  the  numerous  individual  soils  possess  exactly  the  same 
characteristics,  and  no  two  are,  therefore,  adapted  in  the  same  degree 
to  exactly  the  same  crops  nor  to  the  same  treatment  and  handling. 

\\ 'hen  all  of  these  differences  have  been  ascertained,  and  when  the 
significance  of  these  differences  comes  to  be  understood,  the  country 
will  be  able  by  the  introduction  of  new  crops  and  by  greater  special- 
ization in  crop  production  to  increase  greatly  the  agricultural  efficiency 
of  every  tilled  acre. 

DEMA2TDS   FOP.  THE    WORK. 

Each  }Tear  brings  an  increasing  number  of  requests  for  survey  work 
in  particular  localities  to  serve  a  great  diversity  of  interests.  The 
development  of  new  lands  in  the  United  States  has  not  ceased  and  the 


REPORT    OF   THE    SECRETARY.  75 

need  for  specific  and  unprejudiced  information  concerning  soils  in 
newly  developed  regions  has  become  widely  recognized.  The  exten- 
sion of  tobacco  culture  through  certain  portions  of  the  Gulf  States  has 
led  to  numerous  requests  for  surveys  to  locate  areas  of  soil  where 
the  Cuban  t}Tpe  of  tiller  tobacco  may  be  grown  successfully.  Only  a 
few  soils  are  suited  to  the  production  of  this  leaf,  and  unless  such  soils 
are  found  in  an  area  the  attempt  to  introduce  the  crop  must  result  in 
failure.  The  growth  of  the  fruit  interests  in  all  sections  of  the  coun- 
try has  led  to  widespread  demands  for  surveys  to  determine  what  soils 
are  peculiarly  adapted  to  the  growing  of  apples,  pears,  peaches,  grapes, 
or  citrus  fruits,  the  location  of  these  soils,  and  their  extent.  The 
depression  of  farm  values  in  some  sections  has  called  attention  to  the 
possibility  of  rehabilitating  these  farms  and  soils  through  the  introduc- 
tion of  new  crops  and  of  new  methods,  and  surveys  are  requested  to 
furnish  guidance  along  these  lines.  New  areas  for  the  production  of 
market-garden  and  truck  crops  are  being  developed  along  the  Atlantic 
and  Gulf  coast  lines,  and  surveys  have  been  requested  for  many  of 
these  areas.  The  northward  spread  of  the  culture  of  rice  upon  prairie 
lands  has  given  rise  to  requests  for  surveys  to  indicate  soils  and  regions 
where  this  crop  might  be  introduced. 

As  a  result  the  Bureau  of  Soils  has  always  on  file  requests  for  several 
times  as  many  surveys  as  can  be  made  during  any  one  year,  and  the 
completion  of  each  year's  work  is  accompanied  by  an  increased  rather 
than  a  diminished  volume  of  requests.  While  such  a  condition  is 
gratifying  from  the  standpoint  of  public  appreciation  of  the  value  of 
the  work,  it  is  embarrassing  and  unsatisfactory  because  of  the  neces- 
sity for  selecting  among  so  many  requests  of  almost  equal  urgency 
those  areas  which  may  be  undertaken  each  year.  The  public  demand 
for  the  making  of  these  surveys  and  the  constant  application  for  sur- 
vey reports,  not  only  for  areas  which  have  been  surveyed,  but  also  for 
those  which  have  not  yet  been  undertaken,  both  evince  the  necessity 
for  a  considerable  increase  in  the  volume  of  soil-survey  work  in  the 
immediate  future. 

RECLAMATION  OF  ALKALI  LANDS. 

The  progress  of  the  work  on  the  several  alkali  reclamation  tracts  dur- 
ing the  fiscal  year  just  closed  has  been  gratifying,  both  as  regards  the 
immediate  success  of  the  experiments  and  as  regards  the  stimulating 
effect  that  these  results  have  had  upon  private  initiative  in  the  work 
of  reclaiming  similarly  affected  neighboring  lands. 

PROGRESS    ON    THE    UTAH    TRACT. 

On  the  Swan  tract,  near  Salt  Lake  City,  Utah,  the  work  consisted 
largely  of  experiments  with  various  crops,  as  the  removal  of  alkali 
had  practically  been  accomplished  by  repeated  flooding  in  1903  and 


76  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPABTMKBTT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

1904.  The  thrifty  growth  of  alfalfa  and  of  other  crop-,  not  perhaps 
as  sensitive  to  alkali,  clearly  demonstrates  the  great  changes  that  have 
taken  place  in  the  soil  since  it  has  been  treated.  Formerly  this  field 
presented  a  desolate  appearance,  with  large  areas  heavily  incrusted 
with  alkali.  The  success  of  this  experiment  can  not  but  be  far-reach- 
ing in  its  influence  upon  the  alkali  question  in  the  Salt  Lake  Valley. 

COMPLETION    OF    WORK    AT    FEE- 

Our  earlier  work  on  the  Toft-Hansen  tract,  near  Fresno.  Cal..  had 
freed  the  upper  layers  of  soil  from  alkali,  and  very  satisfactory  crops 
had  been  grown:  however,  while  the  alkali  question  had  been  solved, 
a  constant  source  of  danger  was  the  high  ground  water,  which  rises 
very  rapidly  in  this  district  after  water  is  turned  into  the  canals  each 
spring.  The  original  drainage  system  was  not  very  deep,  and  the 
question  of  keeping  the  drains  free  from  sand  and  silt  proved  serious. 
In  order  further  to  experiment  with  the  lowering  of  the  ground  water, 
it  was  thought  advisable  to  install  a  new  drainage  system.  This  was 
completed  in  November.  1905.  The  entire  drainage  system  was  low- 
ered from  1^  to  2i  feet,  and  the  ground  water  is  now  kept  at  a  safe 
depth,  not  only  under  the  land  drained,  but  under  adjoining  farms  to 
the  extent  of  200  acres. 

The  success  of  this  work  has  proved  of  great  value  to  the  farmers 
of  the  alkali  and  seepage-infested  district  about  Fresno,  and  many  have 
signified  their  intention  of  undertaking  work  similar  to  that  carried 
on  by  the  Bureau  of  Soils.  At  the  close  of  the  irrigation  season  of 
1906,  the  Bureau's  work  in  the  Fresno  district  will  close,  as  the  owners 
of  the  land  are  well  pleased  with  the  reclaimed  condition  of  the  soil 
and  the  success  of  the  newly  installed  drainage  system. 

CONTIKUATION    OF    THE    WORK    AT    YAKIMA.    WASH. 

In  Washington,  in  the  Yakima  Valley,  the  results  have  not  been 
quite  as  satisfactory  as  was  hoped  when  the  work  was  commenced. 
"While  parts  of  the  Gervais  tract,  near  North  Yakima,  have  been 
thoroughly  reclaimed  and  produced  in  1905  a  heavy  crop  of  hay.  valued 
at  $160,  other  parts  of  the  tract  have  not  yielded  to  treatment  so 
readily.  That  some  parts  of  the  tract  still  contain  appreciable  quan- 
tities of  black  alkali  is  evident  from  the  crop  returns,  from  repeated 
chemical  tests,  and  from  the  characteristic  dark  stains  in  the  soil.  It 
mewhat  difficult  to  explain  the  retention  of  alkali  by  the  soils  of 
the  Yakima  Valley.  It  is  well  known  that  hardpan  retards  the  move- 
ment of  alkali,  and  it  seems  probable  also  that  the  volcanic  a.-h  soils  of 
this  valley  may  have  a  high  absorptive  capacity,  enabling  them  still  to 
retain  injurious  quantities  of  black  alkali  in  spite  of  repeated  flooding. 
Good  lands  in  this  region  produce  such  profitable  crops  that  the  exact 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  77 

treatment  for  the  alkali  lands  should  be  ascertained  if  possible,  even 
though  the  total  cost  of  reclamation  be  great  as  compared  with  other 
districts. 

EAPID    COMPLETION*    OF   THE   RECLAMATION    WORK    IN    ARIZONA. 

The  record  of  the  Cummings  tract,  near  Tempe,  in  the  Salt  River 
Valley,  Arizona,  is  excellent.  The  drainage  system  was  installed 
early  in  1904,  but  no  water  was  available  for  leaching  out  the  alkali 
until  many  months  later.  When  the  water  supply  became  more 
abundant  the  removal  of  the  alkali  was  comparatively  simple.  At 
the  present  time  1-H  acres  support  a  fine  stand  of  alfalfa,  planted  in 
November,  1905,  while  the  remainder  has  produced  a  heavy  crop  of 
barley.  The  owner  of  the  land  is  full}'  satisfied  with  the  showing  of 
the  crops  and  only  awaits  the  seeding  of  the  small  tract  to  alfalfa  before 
accepting  the  land  according  to  the  contract  originally  agreed  upon. 
As  the  water  supply  of  the  valley  is  still  further  increased  by  the 
extensive  operations  of  the  United  States  Reclamation  Service  in 
constructing  storage  reservoirs,  the  subject  of  eliminating  alkali  and 
controlling  the  ground  water  will  become  more  important,  and  the 
Bureau  is  very  fortunate  in  having  undertaken  and  completed  this 
work  at  such  an  opportune  time. 

RESULTS    IN    MONTANA. 

The  showing  of  the  O'Donnell  tract  in  the  Yellowstone  Valley, 
Montana,  is  fully  as  good,  if  not  better,  than  the  one  just  mentioned. 
The  drainage  system  was  installed  during  1901,  but  too  late  to  allow 
any  flooding.  During  1905  the  land  was  continuously  flooded  for  sev- 
eral months.  From  the  outset  the  drainage  system  worked  perfectly 
and  large  quantities  of  alkali  were  removed  by  the  drainage  water. 
Tests  made  in  June,  1900,  showed  that  the  alkali  content  to  a  depth  of 
1  feet  had  decreased  to  approximately  0.2  per  cent  over  the  entire 
tract.  In  1901  the  soil  contained  more  than  1  per  cent  to  a  depth  of 
4  feet,  largely  concentrated  in  the  first  and  second  feet.  The  compar- 
ison shows  the  extent  to  which  the  alkali  had  been  removed  by  a  sin- 
gle year's  flooding.  Early  this  year  the  soil  was  put  in  order  and 
seeded  to  oats.  This  crop  produced  a  yield  that  compared  favorably 
with  the  most  productive  lands  in  the  valley. 

Since  it  has  been  shown  that  alkali  can  be  removed  from  the  soils  in 
the  Billings  district  the  outlook  is  most  promising.  One  of  the  worst 
alkali  and  seepage  areas  has  been  included  in  a  drainage  district,  and 
a  deep  outlet  ditch  now  constructed  will  serve  to  carry  the  surplus 
water  from  smaller,  more  detailed  drainage  systems  in  individual  fields. 
Smaller  local  drainage  systems  are  also  being  formed  by  private 
enterprise. 


78  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGLICULTUEE. 

NEED    BOB   CONTINUING    THE   DEMONSTRATIONS. 

In  carrying  on  the  work  in  reclaiming  alkali  soils  we  have  had  many 
different  conditions  to  meet  and  local  difficulties  to  overcome.  At 
each  tract  the  character  of  the  soil  differed  from  that  of  the  other 
ts,  and  at  no  two  places  are  the  alkali  conditions  nor  the  details  of 
attacking  the  problem  the  same.  This  makes  plain  the  wisdom  of 
nding  the  work  to  other  affected  districts  in  order  that  full  and 
exact  plans  may  be  placed  in  the  hands  of  the  farmers  suffering  this 
common  evil  of  the  arid  YCest. 

Already  urgent  requests  for  the  extension  of  this  work  are  on  file  in 
the  Department,  and  in  view  of  its  great  economic  importance  it  is  the 
intention  to  follow  the  completion  of  the  present  demonstrations  with 
the  reclamation  of  small  tract-  in  some  other  of  the  worst  affected 
ions.  There  is  no  one  soil  problem  more  important  to  a  large 
number  of  our  western  farmers  than  this,  and  none,  happily,  that  is 
capable  of  such  quick  solution  or  that  involves  so  great  and  so  certain 
immediate  increase  in  their  wealth. 

TOBACCO    INVESTIGATIONS. 

During  the  fiscal  year  just  closed  the  Bureau  of  Soils  has  continued 
its  investigations  for  the  improvement  of  tobacco  in  Texas.  Alabama, 
Ohio,  Virginia,  and  Connecticut. 

EXPERIMENTS    IN    TEXA>. 

The  tobacco  grown  in  Texas  during  the  preceding  year  was  distrib- 
uted to  the  trade  for  the  purpose  of  ascertaining  its  commercial  value. 
In  all  300  samples  were  sent  out.  and  from  the  numerous  replies 
received  it  can  be  positively  stated  that  the  tobacco  produced  in  Texas 
meets  the  requirements  of  the  trade  as  a  high-class  domestic  tiller. 
About  200  acres  are  now  being  grown  on  the  Orangeburg  soils  in 
Nacogdoches.  Anderson.  Houston,  and  Montgomery  counties  in  east 
hile  in  central  Texas,  in  Lavaca  and  Lee  counties,  experi- 
ments were  conducted  on  similar  soils.  The  industry  is  now  assum- 
ing a  conun  itus.  as  a  ready  market  has  been  created  for  the 
leaf.  Great  interest  has  been  shown  by  the  trade,  by  railroads,  and 
by  local  interests  in  east  Texas  as  a  tobacco-producing  region,  and, 
with  the  promising  beginning  made  in  the  counties  mentioned,  there 
is  every  reason  to  believe  that  this  section  of  the  State  will  soon  be 
recognized  as  an  important  factor  in  our  tobacco  industry. 

-I'ECTS    IX    ALABAMA. 

The  investigations  for  the  production  of  filler  leaf  in  Alabama  have 
this  past  year  been  extended  into  Dallas  County,  in  the  southern  part 
of  which  the  Orangeburg  soils  appear.     In  Perry  County  the  acreage 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  79 

increased  over  100  per  cent.  A  ready  market  has  been  found  for  the 
product,  and  this  has  proved  a  stimulus  to  the  growers.  The  tobacco 
produced  is  similar  in  quality  to  the  Texas  and  Florida  leaf,  and  the 
cost  of  production  is  a  little  less. 

FERMENTATION    AND    SELECTION    IN    OHIO. 

In  Ohio  the  work  of  introducing'  the  bulk  method  of  fermentation 
has  been  continued,  and  over  25,000,000  pounds  of  tobacco  have  been 
fermented  according  to  the  method  prescribed  by  the  Bureau  of  Soils. 
It  has  taken  a  period  of  live  years  to  accomplish  these  results,  and  the 
system  is  now  so  well  established  in  Ohio  that  the  packers  should  be 
able  to  proceed  without  further  supervision  by  our  experts.  Besides 
the  fermentation  work,  the  work  of  introducing  Cuban  seed  filler  in 
Ohio  has  been  continued,  25  acres  having  been  planted  by  the  farmers 
under  the  direction  of  the  Bureau.  This  was  contracted  for  with  local 
packers  at  prices  ranging  from  18  to  20  cents  a  pound. 

In  Ohio,  also,  cooperative  experiments  have  been  conducted  with 
the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  in  the  selecting  and  breeding  of  improved 
types  of  tobacco,  with  a  view  to  securing  types  of  leaf  giving  a  larger 
yield  and  having  a  uniform  quality.  Selections  were  made  of  Zimmer 
Spanish,  Little  Dutch,  Ohio  Seedleaf,  and  Ohio  Cuban.  It  is  believed 
that  by  this  method  of  selection  of  seed  native  varieties  of  Ohio 
tobacco  may  be  greatly  improved,  since  where  so  man}7  varieties  are 
grown,  as  in  the  Miami  Valley  of  Ohio,  there  is  great  danger  of  their 
becoming  mixed. 

EXPORT   TOBACCO    IN    VIRGINIA. 

The  experiments  begun  in  Virginia  in  1901  with  heavy  fire-cured 
tobacco  have  been  continued  during  the  past  fiscal  year.  In  the  first 
year  of  this  work  it  was  demonstrated  that  by  the  use  of  carefully 
selected  fertilizers  the  profits  in  growing  this  type  of  leaf  could  be 
increased  considerably  as  compared  with  those  obtained  by  the  Virginia 
farmer.  During  the  past  year  the  same  treatment  of  the  same  land 
was  followed,  and,  between  the  two  crops  of  tobacco,  rye  was  sown 
as  a  cover  crop  and  plowed  under  in  the  spring  of  the  year.  The 
results  obtained  show  the  accumulative  effects  of  the  fertilizer  and 
cultural  methods  used.  The  land  was  divided  into  3-acre  plats.  On 
one  the  fertilizer  practice  common  to  the  locality  was  followed,  on  the 
second  a  slightly  bettor  brand  was  applied,  and  on  the  third  a  still 
more  expensive  application  was  made. 

The  cost  of  production  of  the  three  plats  was  respectively  ^44.50, 
$63.60,  and  $85.49,  which  shows  a  net  profit  of  $15.63  on  plat  1, 
$37.01  on  plat  2,  and  $10.10  on  plat  3.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that 
the  same  plats  of  ground  receiving  the  same  treatment  in  1904  netted 
profits  of  $5,  $21,  and  $2-1,  respectively,  showing  gains  in  1905  over 


80  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGETCCLTULE. 

19*4  of  $10.63,  $16.01,  and  $16.10,  respectively.     These   results  are 

highly  significant  as  indicating  what  may  be  clone  in  this  important 
tobacco  district  by  the  use  of  such  methods  as  are  practiced,  for  instai 
by  the  Connecticut  Broadleaf  growers. 

BEGINNING    OF    EXPERIMENTS    WITH    VIRGINIA    BRIGHT    TOB.V. 

Investigations  for  the  improvement  of  the  Bright  tobacco  of  Vir- 
ginia were  also  begun  during  the  past  h-cal  year  (ended  Jure 
1906),  in  cooperation  with  the  Virginia  Experiment  Station,  the 
experimental  held  being  situated  near  Chatham,  in  Pittsylvania  County, 
the  center  of  the  Bright  tobacco  belt  of  Virginia,  and  within  90  miles 
of  Danville,  tbe  largest  market  for  this  class  of  tobacco.  The  experi- 
ment is  still  in  progress,  and  it  will  be  impossible  to  report  definite 
results  until  next  year. 

CONNECTICUT    SHADE-GROWN    TOBACCO. 

In  the  Connecticut  Valley  the  work  of  producing,  under  shade,  a 
wrapper  leaf  having  all  the  qualities  demanded  by  the  trade  fa  - 
continued  in  connection  with  the  breeding  experiments  of  the  Bureau 
of  Plant  Industry.  Eleven  selections  were  taken  in  a  4-acre  tent,  seven 
from  Sumatra  seed  and  four  from  Cuban  seed  of  the  third  generation 
in  Connecticut.  The  yield  of  Sumatra  ranged  from  1.445  to  1,619 
pounds  per  acre,  and  of  Cuban  from  1,134  to  1,384  pounds  per  acre. 
Out  of  these  eleven  types  there  have  been  selected  two  types  of  Sam 
and  one  of  Cuban  seed  that  appear  to  meet  the  demands  of  the  trade. 

Besides  the  area  in  the  experimental  tent  of  the  Department,  there 
were  grown  by  private  planters  during  the  year  about  120  acres  under 
cloth  shade,  both  Cuban  seed  and  Connecticut  Broadleaf  being  planted. 
This  is  a  slight  increase  over  the  acreage  planted  the  pre 
and  indicates  that  the  trade  is  becoming  interested  in  the  shade  product. 
One  firm  growing  Broadleaf  sold  the  tobacco  for  $1,061  an  a  re.  giving 
a  profit  of  about  $300  an  acre.     The  Cuban  tobacco  was  sold  for  $1,2 
an  acre.    During  the  summer  of  19u6  the  crop  grown  by  the  De partment 
from  selected  seed  of  both  the  Cuban  and  Sumatra variet 
tributed  to  thirty-three  of  the  largest  leaf  dealers  and  cigar  manul 
turers  in  the  principal  cities  of  the  East.     These  were  sent  out  with  a 
request  that  they  test  the  leaf  and  report  to  the  Department  their 
opinion  of  its  quality  and  its  adaptability  for  manufacturing  purp 
Up  to  the  time  of  closing  this  report  answers  have  been  received  from 
twenty-live  of  those  to  whom  samples  were  sent,  and  with  one  excep- 
tion they  report  that  the  tobacco  has  all  the  qualities  demanded  by  the 
trade  in  a  domestic  cigar  wrapper,  and  if  tobacco  similar  to  the  samples 

can  be  grown  on  a  commercial  scale  they  do  not  he 
that  a  ready  market  can  be  found  for  it. 

There  can  be  no  question  that  tobacco  of  this  quality  can  be  produced 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  §1 

on  a  commercial  scale  by  careful  growers  if  the  methods  used  and 
recommended  by  the  Bureau  of  Soils  are  followed.  Notwithstanding 
the  uniformly  favorable  reports  received  from  the  trade  on  the  merits 
of  this  tobacco,  the  Bureau,  however,  would  caution  the  prospective 
grower  against  embarking  in  the  industry  on  too  large  a  scale  at  the 
outset. 

PREVENTION*    OF    POLE    SWEAT. 

Owing  to  the  serious  damage  caused  annually  in  Connecticut  by  pole 
sweat  or  house  burn,  the  Bureau  of  Soils  conducted  some  preliminary 
investigations  in  curing  sheds  containing  both  the  cut  and  primed 
tobacco.  A  detailed  record  of  the  moisture  and  temperature  condi- 
tions in  each  shed  was  kept,  as  also  of  the  condition  of  the  tobacco, 
with  a  view  to  determining  the  point  of  relative  humidity  and  tem- 
perature of  atmosphere  at  which  tobacco  would  begin  to  pole  sweat 
and  the  means  to  prevent  the  atmosphere  of  the  shed  becoming  such 
as  to  favor  its  spread.  This  study  will  lie  closely  followed,  as  it  is 
believed  that  results  can  be  obtained  which  will  be  of  great  value  to- 
the  Connecticut  growers. 

Urgent  demands  have  been  made  upon  the  Department  to  extend  its- 
operations  into  Florida,  Maryland,  Wisconsin,  and  Tennessee,  but 
owing  to  the  limited  appropriation  for  this  work  it  has  so  far  been 
impossible  to  comply  with  these  requests. 

BUREAU  OF  ENTOMOLOGY. 

Practically  all  of  the  investigations  under  way  in  the  Bureau  of 
Entomology  at  the  time  of  my  last  report  have  been  continued  with 
excellent  results,  and  several  new  and  important  lines  of  work  have 
been  begun. 

THE    MEXICAN    COTTON    BOLL    WEEVIL. 

Encouraging  progress  has  been  made  in  the  work  against  the  Mex- 
ican cotton  boll  weevil,  as  shown  by  an  extensive  canvass  of  the  cotton 
planters  who  have  followed  the  recommendations  of  the  Bureau. 

Owing  to  climatic  conditions  in  the  summer  and  fall  of  1904  and  in 
the  winter  of  1904-5,  some  of  the  area  that  became  infested  late  in  the 
summer  of  1901  was  entirely  devoid  of  weevils  in  the  early  part  of 
1905,  but  the  fall  movements  of  the  weevil  in  1905  more  than  covered 
this  area.  This  permitted  studies  for  which  there  had  been  previously 
little  opportunity,  and  many  points  which  had  a  bearing  upon  the 
possibility  of  the  continued  advance  of  the  pest  were  investigated. 

EXPERIMENTAL    FARMS. 

The  continuation  of  the  experimental  farms  at  fourteen  places  in 
Texas  has  been  deemed  desirable,  as  the  value  of  experimental  field 
work  depends  largely  upon  the  number  of  seasons  through  which  it  has 
3     A1906 6 


82  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

been  carried.  Two  additional  experimental  farms  bare  been  carried 
on  in  Louisiana.  The  whole  acreage  placed  under  contract  in  these 
experiments  is  877. 

The  modifications  in  the  cultural  system  of  lessening  damage,  made 
necessary  by  the  change  in  habits  of  the  insect,  were  carefully  studied 
in  connection  with  the  work  carried  on  in  the  laboratory. 

OTHER    FIELD    WORK. 

In  addition  to  experimental  plats  on  a  large  scale  numerous  field 
experiments  were  conducted,  including  an  extensive  experiment  in 
the  hand  picking  of  infested  bolls  and  considerable  other  work 
directed  to  the  solution  of  questions  which  can  not  be  tested  with  the 
fullest  practical  effect  in  the  laboratory. 

The  continued  spread' of  the  weevil  has  been  carefully  watched,  and 
publications  regarding  the  new  territory  infested  have  been  issued  in 
cooperation  with  the  "Weather  Bureau.  Careful  study  has  been  made 
of  the  conditions  in  western  Texas  in  order  to  determine  whether  the 
weevil  is  likely  to  spread  to  that  part  of  the  State  in  spite  of  the  gen- 
eral idea  that  such  spread  will  not  take  place 

LABORATORY    WORE. 

In  the  well-fitted  laboratory  now  located  at  Dallas,  Tex.,  the  effects 
of  different  temperatures  and  the  condition  of  food  supply  upon  the 
development  of  the  weevil  were  tested,  the  breeding  of  parasites  was 
continued,  and  a  special  study  was  made  of  a  native  ant  which  seems 
to  be  becoming  more  and  more  an  important  factor  in  the  natural  con- 
trol of  the  weevil.  Investigations  of  the  distribution  of  this  ant,  its 
adaptability  to  different  soil  conditions,  and  the  possibility  of  its  arti- 
ficial propagation  have  also  been  made. 

TRUE    PARASITES  OF   THE    BOLL    WEEVIL. 

Since  the  weevil  entered  Texas  native  parasites  have  had  little  effect 
upon  it  until  recently.  During  the  year,  however,  it  was  found  that  in 
the  Brownsville  region — first  entered  by  the  weevil  about  1893 — native 
parasites  have  accommodated  themselves  to  its  habits,  and  now  at  least 
50  per  cent  of  the  early  stages  are  sometimes  destroyed  by  these 
parasites.  Consequently  much  attention  is  being  paid  to  the  parasite 
question,  in  order  to  determine  whether  it  will  be  possible  to  assist  the 
work  of  these  beneficial  insects.  It  seems  probable  that  the  small 
results  gained  from  the  work  of  parasites  down  to  the  present  time 
are  largely  due  to  the  recent  invasion  of  the  cotton  fields  of  the  South 
by  the  injurious  insect. 

COOPERATION    WITH    THE    LOUISIANA    CHOP    REST    COMMISSION. 

Cooperation  with  the  Louisiana  Crop  Pest  Commission,  begun  in 
l!»04,  was  continued  during  the  year,  three  assistants  being  employed 
by  the  Bureau  for  work  in  Louisiana.     During  the  season  of  1905  it 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  S3 

was  planned  to  enter  upon  an  extensive  study  of  the  so-called  migra- 
tory  movement  of  the  boll  weevil  in  order  to  learn,  if  possible,  some 
method  of  checking-  its  further  advances,  or  at  least  to  learn  more 
definitely  the  approximate  time  when  other  regions  may  become 
infested.  On  account,  however,  of  the  occurrence  of  yellow  fever 
and  the  consequent  rigid  quarantine,  it  was  impossible  to  carry  on 
this  work  in  full,  but  a  number  of  important  observations  were  made. 
In  cooperation  with  the  commission  more  than  25,008  weevils  were 
carefully  studied  under  natural  conditions  during  the  winter. 

THE    COTTON    BOLL  WORM. 

The  work  on  the  cotton  bollworm  during  the  fiscal  year  was  largely 
in  the  character  of  demonstrations,  indicating  the  value  of  conclusions 
already  reached  and  detailed  in  the  last  annual  report  of  the  Ento- 
mologist, aud  successful  efforts  were  made  locally  in  the  extermination 
of  the  bollworm  by  means  of  poisons. 

OTHER    COTTON    INSECTS. 

The  work  on  other  cotton  insects  has  been  done  largely  in  cooperation 
witli  the  Texas  Agricultural  Experiment  Station.  A  field  agent  of  the 
Bureau  was  stationed  at  the  Texas  Agricultural  College,  devoting  his 
attention  to  the  other  insects  affecting  the  cotton  plant.  The  important 
discovery  has  been  made  that  it  is  possible  to  propagate  the  predaceous 
enemies  of  the  cotton  plant-louse,  an  insect  which  sometimes  causes  great 
damage  to  young  cotton.  It  is  believed  that  this  work  will  lead  to  a 
practical  method  of  controlling  the  pest. 

INTRODUCTION    OF    BENEFICIAL    IXSECTS. 

The  most  important  work  in  connection  with  the  introduction  of 
beneficial  insects  has  been  the  importing  from  Europe  of  the  para- 
sites and  predaceous  enemies  of  the  gips}T  and  brown-tail  moths,  in 
cooperation  with  the  officials  of  the  State  of  Massachusetts. 

PARASITES    OF   THE    GIPSY    MOTH    AND    BROWX-TAIL    MOTH. 

It  has  been  shown  that  it  is  an  easy  matter  to  bring  the  European 
parasites  of  these  injurious  insects  to  this  country,  simply  by  collect- 
ing numbers  of  the  larvae  and  chiysalides  in  different  parts  of  Europe 
and  sending  them  direct  to  Boston.  A  certain  percentage  of  these 
insects  on  arrival  in  New  England  have  given  out  the  European  para- 
sites, which  have  either  been  cultivated  in  wire-gauze  inclosures,  with 
plenty  of  food,  or  have  been  liberated  in  the  open,  there  being  chosen 
for  this  purpose  patches  of  woods  not  subject  to  forest  fires  or  to 
remedial  work  against  the  insects.  It  has  been  ascertained  further — 
and  this  is  a  fact  hitherto  unknown  even  to  European  entomologists — 
that  the  young  larvae  of  the  brown-tail  moth  in  their  overwintering 


S4  YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    BEPAETMENT    OF    AGEICULTUEE. 

-  in  Europe  are  extensively  parasitized.  Therefore,  during  the 
winter  of  1905-6  over  117.000  nests  of  the  brown-tail  moth  were  col- 
lected in  33  different  localities  in  Europe,  ranging  between  North  Ger- 
many. South  Hungary,  and  West  Brittany,  and  comprising  a  large 
range  of  varying  elevations  and  climatic  conditions.  More  than  ft),  I 
parasites  were  reared  from  the  -  n  --on  American  soil.  About  8  per 
- .  were  hyperparasites;  that  is.  parasites  upon  parasites. 

By  means  of  specially  constructed  cages  the  hyperparasites  were 
separated  and  desti  The  primary  parasites  were  placed  in  out- 

of-door  cages  or  liberated  in  the  open.  The  largest  colonies  included 
1  .  ,15,  0,  and  25,000 parasites,  respectively.  Owing  to  the  very 
wet  season  a  fungous  disease  prevailed  among  the  caterpillars,  vitiat- 
ing to  some  extent  the  results  of  the  experiments,  but  nevertheless 
thiv  :   parasites  were  seen  to  lay  their  eggs  in  American- 

born  caterpillars,  and  there  is  positive  proof  of  the  development  on 
American  soil  of  at  least  one  complete  generation  of  two  of  the  Euro- 
pean species.  It  has  been  shown  that  they  may  breed  successfully 
through  the  season. 

:>f  the  brown-tail  moth  have'also  been  imported  dur- 
ing the  summer,  and  have  been  seen  to  lay  their  eggs  in  the  egg-  of 
N   rth  American  injurious  insects.     Two  important  European  preda- 
ground  beetles  have  been  successfully  imported,  and  have  bred 
through  an  entire  generation  upon  American  soil.     Large  numbers  of 
ina  flies  have  been  reared  from  European  specimens  of  the  larvae 
of  both  the  gipsy  moth  and  the  brown-tail  moth,  and  are  breeding  in 
vicinity  of  Boston. 

The  greatest  care  ha-  been  taken  to  prevent  the  introduction  of 
hyperparasites  and  other  injurious  insects,  and  there  seems  every 
reason  to  suppose  that  sooner  or  later  the  complete  natural  environ- 
ment of  both  the  gipsy  moth  and  the  brown-tail  moth  will  be  estab- 
lished in  New  England,  placing  them  on  a  par  with  European  condi- 
tions, thus  greatly  reducing  their  present  importance. 

BW    LADYBIRDS   FEOM    EUROPE. 

During  the  late  winter  months  and  spring  of  1906  several  species  of 
European  ladybirds,  well  known  as  destroyers  of  plant  lice,  scale 
-.  and  soft-bodied  insects  of  other  groups,  have  been  imported 
from  Germany.  France,  and  Austria.  All  of  these  have  been  liber- 
ated in  the  vicinity  of  the  parasite  laboratory  at  North  Saugus,  Muss, 
the  country  about  being  orchards  and  forests,  with  an  occasional 
table  garden,  promising  plenty  of  food  for  the  beneficial  species. 

THE    KELEP    OR   GUATEMALAN    ANT. 

rts  i  -  wfi  illy  overwinter  in  Texas  the  kelep  or  Guatemalan 
ant  enemy  of  the  cotton  boll  weevil  have  failed  and  a  possible  useful 
role  for  this  i       :t  in  Texas  is  seemingly  very  slight.     It  is  possible 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  85 

that  this  species  may  have  some  economic  value  in  some  of  our  tropical 
or  subtropical  possessions,  where  the  climate  will  be  more  suitable 
than  in  Texas. 

THE    SENDING    OF    USEFUL    INSECTS   ABROAD. 

It  is  possible,  in  many  iustances,  to  secure  the  sending  of  beneficial 
insects  by  the  official  entomologists  of  other  countries  without  expense 
to  the  Department,  as  was  done  notably  in  the  case  of  the  introduc- 
tion of  an  important  enemy  of  the  black  scale  from  the  government 
of  Cape  Colony.  South  Africa.  In  return  for  such  services  and  as  an 
earnest  for  possible  future  courtesy  of  the  same  sort  exportation*  of 
parasitic  and  predatory  insects  have  been  made,  under  the  auspices  of 
the  Bureau  of  Entomology,  to  foreign  countries.  A  notable  instance 
has  taken  place  during  the  fiscal  year.  A  scale  insect  which  occurs 
abundantly  upon  various  fruit  trees  in  portions  of  the  United  States  is 
a  serious  enemy  to  the  mulberry  tree  in  Italy,  and  therefore  large 
sendiugs  of  parasitized  scales  of  this  species  have  been  shipped  to 
Professor  Berlese.  Director  of  the  Royal  Station  for  Agriculture  and 
Entomology,  at  Florence.  After  arrival  two  species  of  parasites  were 
bred  in  some  numbers,  and  efforts  are  now  being  made  to  colonize 
them  in  Lombardy.  It  is  hoped  that  they  will  prove  effective  aids  in 
the  eradication  of  the  mulberry  scale. 

INSECTS    DAMAGING    FORESTS. 

Investigations  of  insects  damaging  forests  have  progressed  in  a 
satisfactory  manner  in  cooperation  with  the  Forest  Service  of  the 
Department.  Numerous  problems  have  been  studied  and  a  large 
store  of  general  information  upon  forest  insects  has  been  accumulated. 

Field  work  has  been  conducted  from  stations  in  West  Virginia, 
North  Carolina,  South  Dakota,  Idaho.  Washington,  and  California, 
the  locations  of  the  stations  being  determined  by  the  advantages 
offered  at  the  points  selected  for  the  study  of  some  special  problem  or 
problems. 

A  special  investigation  was  carried  on  in  regard  to  the  Black  Hills 
beetle,  which  has  extensively  ravaged  the  forests  in  Colorado,  and  the 
results  prove  to  be  in  the  highest  degree  satisfactory  and  have  been 
published  in  Bulletin  56  of  the  Bureau.  The  recommendations  are 
now  being  actively  followed  by  private  persons  with  excellent  chances 
of  checking  what  might  otherwise  prove  a  most  serious  invasion. 

The  conditions  in  the  Black  Hills  are  not  so  encouraging,  owing, 
doubtless,  to  the  failure  of  the  parties  interested  to  realize  the  importance 
of  the  recommendations  of  the  Bureau.  These  difficulties,  however, 
have  now  been  partially  overcome,  and  all  concerned  seem  alive  to  the 
seriousness  of  the  situation. 


86  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Investigations  in  the  South  of  the  destructive  pine-bark  beetle  and 
of  a  number  of  important  insects  injurious  to  forest  products  have 
been  carried  on,  and  studies  have  been  made  in  regard  to  the  insect 
enemies  of  forest  reproduction.  Special  studies  and  recommendations 
have  been  made  concerning  the  western  pine-bark  beetle  in  the  region 
north  of  Boise.  Idaho,  and  a  study  of  the  forest  insects  of  the  Pacific 
slope  has  been  carried  on. 

INSECTS    DAMAGING    DECIDUOUS    FRUIT    TREES. 

For  the  investigation  of  insect  enemies  of  deciduous  fruit  trees 
field  stations  at  Youngstown.  N,  Y..  and  Fort  Valley.  Gat.,  were  car- 
ried on  to  the  close  of  the  growing  season  of  1905.  and  in  the  spring 
of  1906  others  were  started  at  Myrtle.  Ga..  and  North  East.  Pa. 
Later  another  one  was  established  at  Nebraska  City.  Nebr.  In  the 
course  of  this  work  some  studie-s  have  been  made  of  the  parasites  of 
the  San  Jose  scale,  and  experiments  have  been  made  with  a  numl>er  of 
insecticide  mixtures.  The  chemical  study  of  the  lime-sulphur  and 
other  washes  has  been  undertaken  in  cooperation  with  the  Bureau  of 
Chemistry.  New  studies  have  been  made  of  the  plum  curculio.  The 
peach  borer  has  also  been  studied  throughout  its  geographic  range,  and 
extensive  demonstration  work  has  been  done  in  Nebraska  on  remedies 
for  the  codling  moth,  in  cooperation  with  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry, 
which  at  the  same  time  was  dealing  with  the  apple  scab,  combination 
treatments  for  both  being  carried  on  cooperatively.  Cooperation  in 
this  work  is  also  under  way  with  the  several  other  experiment  stations 
and  the  Georgia  State  entomologist. 

FIELD-CROP    IN'SECTS. 

The  mo.-t  important  work  in  connection  with  field-crop  insects  has 
been  upon  the  Hessian  fly  and  jointworms,  especial  investigations 
having  been  made  of  the  Hessian  fly  in  the  spring-wheat  regions.  It 
was  predicted  that  this  insect  would  not  damage  wheat  in  regions 
where  the  spring  crop  is  exclusively  grown.  This  has  proved  to  be  a 
fallacy,  and  by  reason  of  remarkable  changes  in  the  life  history  of  the 
insect  it  lias  adapted  itself  to  the  conditions  existing  in  the  far  north- 
western country.  This  means  a  radical  modification  in  remedial  work, 
and  the  studies  have  indicated  that  it  will  not  be  difficult  to  bring  about 
conditions  of  comparatively  small  insect  damage.  Important  results 
have  also  been  reached  in  the  study  of  parasites  of  the  Hessiaa  fly, 
which  will  probably  have  a  marked  effect  upon  the  multiplication  of 
the  fly.  In  the  same  way  the  jointworm  investigations  have  resulted 
in  the  acquisition  of  important  knowledge,  both  regarding  possible 
remedial  work  and  the  handling  of  parasites.  Studies  have  also  been 
made  of  clover  seed  and  clover  insects,  and  also  of  other  lield-crop 
pests. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  87 

INSECTS    AFFECTING    VEGETABLE    CROPS    AND    STORED    PRODUCTS. 

Work  on  insects  affecting  vegetable  crops  and  stored  products  has 
been  continued  along  the  same  lines  as  conducted  in  previous  years. 
Insects  affecting  the  sugar  beet  have  been  studied  with  care,  and  a 
special  investigation  has  been  made  of  a  leaf  hopper  affecting  this 
crop  in  Utah,  Idaho,  and  Colorado.  Many  other  insects  of  this  group 
have  been  under  careful  observation,  and  results  of  value. have  been 
obtained. 

INSECTS   WHICH    CARRY    DISEASE    TO   MAN    AND    DOMESTIC    ANIMALS. 

The  work  of  the  Bureau  on  the  subject  of  mosquitoes  has  been  con- 
tinued. A  further  stud}'  of  the  yellow-fever  mosquito  was  made  in 
the  autumn  of  1005,  and  experiments  were  made  with  remedies  and 
methods  of  destruction  against  both  kume  and  adults.  Kecords  have 
been  brought  together  of  the  life  histories  and  geographic  distribu- 
tion of  the  majority  of  the  mosquitoes  inhabiting  North  and  Central 
America  and  the  "West  Indies. 

In  the  spring  of  1906  a  publication  was  issued  upon  the  subject  of 
the  house  fly,  calling  attention  to  its  agency  in  the  spread  of  typhoid 
fever,  pointing  out  proper  methods  for  its  control,  and  urging  the 
adoption  of  these  methods  by  individuals  and  communities. 

It  was  shown  by  observations  made  by  the  Bureau  of  Entomology 
upon  a  series  of  stables  in  two  different  sections  of  the  city  of  Wash- 
ington that  it  is  a  comparatively  easy  matter  greatly  to  reduce  the  num- 
bers of  the  house  lly  in  any  given  community  at  a  comparatively  slight 
expenditure  of  funds  and  effort. 

The  investigation  of  the  life  history  of  the  Texas  cattle  tick,  men- 
tioned in  the  last  annual  report,  has  been  continued  in  cooperation 
with  the  entomologists  of  the  States  of  Louisiana,  Arkansas.  Alabama, 
Tennessee,  and  South  Carolina.  This  work  has  considerably  increased 
our  knowledge  of  the  development  of  the  tick,  and  in  connection  with 
this  work  the  life  history  and  habits  of  a  number  of  other  common 
ticks,  frequently  confused  with  the  fever-transmitting  species,  have 
been  investigated. 

SCALE    INSECTS    AND    EXPERIMENTAL    WORK    WITH    INSECTICIDES. 

This  work,  in  special  charge  of  the  Assistant  Chief  of  the  Bureau 
of  Entomology,  has  been  continued.  An  immense  amount  of  material 
in  this  group  is  sent  in  to  the  Bureau  for  identification  and  advice  and 
the  work  grows  in  importance  and  value. 

A  thorough  inspection  was  made  of  all  new  plants  which  the  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture  is  importing  from  different  parts  of  the  world  to 
detect  and  destroy  any  new  insect  enemies,  principally  scale  insects, 
which  might  be  brought  in  with  them. 


^s  YEAP.BOGK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OP    AGEICULTUEE. 

e  work  with  insecticides  has  covered  tests  with  standard  insecti- 
cides, fumigation  of  mills,  granaries,  and  dwelling-  _  ist  insect  pests, 
and  many  new  insecticide  ideas  or  mixtures,  which  come  to  the  Bureau 
for  attention  almost  daily,  have  been  examined  and  reported  on. 

Te-t-  carried  on  upon  a  large  scale  and  in  a  very  thorough  manner 
with  sulphurous-acid  ga-  have  fully  demonstrated  its  usefulness. 

BEE    CULTURE. 

The  work  on  bee  culture  has  greatly  increased.     A  large  number  of 
3  of  different  varieti  -      sre  reared  and  distributed  from  the 
irtment  apiary,  as   well   as   from   the    substation  at  Chico.  Cal. 
Investigations  of  the  giant  bees  of  India  and  the  Philippines  were  con- 
tinued through  the  year. 

The  various  methods  of  queen  rearing  have  been  tested  in  rearing 
queens  for  distribution,  and  studies  in  bee  diseases  and  in  the  impor- 
-ubject  of  honey -producing  plant-  have  been  carried  on. 

.-ILK    CULTURE. 

There  has  been  no  change  in  the  method  and  scope  of  the  work  on 
silk  culture  dining  the  year.  The  correspondence  was  increased;  a 
supply  of  eggs  has  been  brought  from  Europe  and  distributed  to  cor- 
respondents in  the  United  States:  mulberry  stock  has  been  distributed, 
and  cocoons  have  been  purchased  from  correspondents  and  reeled. 

OTHER    INVESTIGATION.-. 

Work  on   ins     ta  injurious  to  strawberry,  raspberry,  blackberry, 

and  other  bush  fruits  has  been  continued,  and  studies  have  been  made 

of  insects  injurious  to  flower  gardens  and  in  greenhouses.     An  especial 

-  of  the   insect  enemies  of  roses  is  under  way.     The  study  of 

ts  affecting  shade  and  ornamental  trees  has  also  been  continued, 

and  an  investigation  has  been  made  into  the  habits  of  the  gad  die-. 

Routine  work  iu  the  laboratory  ha-  greatly  increased  and  biological 

-   liave  been  made  of  nearly   500  species  not   hitherto  -tudied. 

-   also   been  noted  in  the  work  of  determining  specimens 

for  the  entomologists  of  experiment  stations  and  other  workers.    Many 

thousan  dmens  have  been  received  for  this  purpose. 

BUREAU  OF  BIOLOGICAL  SURVEY. 

GEOGRAPHIC     DISTRIBUTION". 

LIFE    AXD    CROP    ZOXES. 

The  Biological  Survey  deal-  with  many  of  the  problems  of  the  farm, 
orchard,  and  stock  range,  and  aims  to  answer  in  a  practical  way  many 
of  the  questions  that  arise  in  their  management.     One  of  the  most 


EEPOET    OF    THE    SECEETAEY.  89 

important  of  these  is  the  selection  of  crops  and  breeds  of  stock  adapted 
to  the  local  peculiarities  of  temperature,  moisture,  and  other  climatic 
factors  that  prevail,  not  only  in  different  areas,  but  which  in  mountain- 
ous regions  often  characterize  different  parts  of  the  same  farm.  A 
direct  and  reliable  guide  to  such  selection,  apart  from  costly  experi- 
mentation, is  afforded  by  the  distribution  of  the  native  plants  and 
animals,  for  it  has  been  learned  that  animals  and  plants  are  not  scat- 
tered haphazard  over  the  land,  but  in  their  distribution  are  governed 
by  fixed  laws.  Thus  the  association,  on  a  given  area  of  certain  birds, 
mammals,  trees,  and  shrubs,  presupposes  the  existence  there  of  certain 
climatic  and  physical  conditions. 

It  naturally  follows  that  there  is  a  direct  relation  between  the  plant 
and  animal  life  of  such  an  area  and  the  nature  of  the  crops  that  can 
be  grown  upon  it.  The  purpose  of  a  biological  survey  of  the  several 
States  is  to  supply  life-zone  maps  based  upon  a  study  of  the  natural 
animal  and  plant  life,  followed  by  crop-zone  maps  with  lists  of  fruits 
and  crops  which  will  best  thrive  in  such  areas.  A  generalized  report 
of  this  nature,  covering  the  United  States  as  a  whole,  has  been  already 
published  (Bull.  10,  Biological  Survey).  The  work  is  now  being  car- 
ried on  in  more  detail  and  on  larger  scale  maps  in  several  of  the 
Western  States. 

DISTRIBUTION    AND    MIGRATION    OF   DUCKS    AND    SHORE    BIRDS. 

As  the  game  birds  of  the  country  diminish  in  numbers,  and  as  their 
importance  in  the  eyes  of  sportsmen  and  for  food  increases,  the  neces- 
sity of  legislative  protection  becomes  more  imperative. 

In  order  to  afford  an  accurate  basis  for  such  legislation,  the  routes 
of  migration  and  the  time  of  arrival  and  departure  of  ducks  and  geese 
and  the  shore  birds  have  been  carefully  studied. 

ECONOMIC    INVESTIGATIONS. 

ECONOMIC    MAMMALOGY. 

The  field  included  in  this  branch  of  the  work  is  wide  and  important, 
the  losses  inflicted  upon  the  agricultural  and  stock-raising  interests  in 
the  United  States  by  noxious  animals  amounting  annually  to  many 
millions  of  dollars.  The  most  prominent  offenders  are  the  wolves  and 
the  gnawing  animals  known  as  rodents — especially  the  rats  and  mice, 
rabbits,  ground  squirrels,  and  gophers.  Much  time  and  ingenuity  and 
vast  sums  of  money  have  been  expended  in  devising  means  to  restrict 
the  numbers  and  minimize  the  damage  done  by  these  animals.  Traps, 
poisons,  and  gases  have  been  carefully  experimented  with  under  vary- 
ing circumstances,  and  have  proved  more  or  less  effective,  but  the 
farmer  does  not  always  possess  the  requisite  time  and  skill  to  employ 
them  to  best  advantage,  and  even  when  they  serve  to  accomplish  the 
object  intended  the  cost  is  considerable. 


90  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Meanwhile  agriculture  la  assuming  more  and  more  importance  in 
the  United  States,  and  with  increasing  crops  comes  a  corresponding 
increase  in  the  numbers  of  the  pests  that  destroy  them. 

In  the  hope  of  rinding  a  remedy,  the  Bureau  of  Biological  Survey 
is  now  engaged  in  experiments  with  epidemic  diseases — diseases  which 
in  the  course  of  nature  break  out  at  intervals  and  serve  to  reduce  the 
numbers  of  rabbits,  squirrels,  mice,  and  other  noxious  animals  to 
below  the  danger  point.  As  some,  if  not  all  these  diseases,  are  of 
bacterial  origin,  it  is  thought  possible  to  obtain  and  preserve  cultures 
of  them  for  employment  when  and  where  occasion  arises.  Prior  to 
their  use  in  the  field,  however,  a  series  of  careful  experiments  is  nec- 
rv  to  determine  the  character  of  the  diseases — whether  limited,  as 
some  undoubtedly  are.  to  particular  animals — the  degree  of  their  viru- 
lence, the  extent  of  their  communicability  from  animal  to  animal  of  a 
colony,  and  above  all  to  make  sure  that  human  beings  and  farm  stock 
are  immune  from  their  influence. 

In  cooperation  with  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry,  experiments 
have  been  already  made  with  a  virus  for  destroying  rats  and  mice, 
and  in  cooperation  with  the  State  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  at 
Pullman.  Wash.,  experiments  are  being  tried  with  a  disease  endemic 
to  one  of  the  ground  squirrels  of  that  region.  The  results  of  the  latter 
experiments  are  awaited  with  peculiar  interest,  since  the  area  infested 
by  ground  squirrels  in  Washington,  Oregon,  and  Idaho  is  very  large, 
and  everywhere  over  it  great  damage  is  done  to  the  wheat  crop. 

With  a  view  to  eliciting  timely  information  as  to  the  prevalence  of 
epidemic  disease  among  rabbits,  ground  squirrels,  prairie  dogs,  rats, 
and  mice,  a  circular  of  inquiry  has  been  widely  distributed.  The  sub- 
ject is  one  of  large  possibilities,  and  time  and  money  will  be  well  spent 
if  effective  and  economical  methods  are  found  to  relieve  the  farmer  of 
part  of  the  burden  and  expense  of  protecting  his  crops  from  rodent 
pests,  which  are  as  numerous  and  destructive  as  they  are  ubiquitous 
and  elusive. 

UEPKEDATIONS    BY    WOLVES. 

In  cooperation  with  the  Forest  Service  investigations  are  being  made 
with  a  view  to  the  reduction  of  the  numbers  of  wolves  on  the  stock 
ranges  and  on  the  game  and  forest  reserves  of  the  West.  Wolves  are 
still  numerous  in  certain  sections,  and  by  reason  of  their  size  and 
strength  constitute  a  formidable  enemy  to  stock  and  to  wild  game. 
It  is  thought  that  effective  means  for  the  abatement  of  the  nuisance 
have  been  found  and  a  report  on  the  -abject  will  soon  be  ready  for 
publication. 

THE    EABEIT    I\ 

The  damage  to  nurseries,  orchards,  and  crops  of  the  United  States 
by  rabbits  has  always  been  great,  though  happily  nowhere  reaching 
the  proportions  reported  in  Australia.     Many  experiments  have  been 


EEPOET    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  91 

made  by  assistants  of  the  Survey  for  the  purpose  of  discovering  cheap 
methods  of  protecting  orchards  by  wire  fencing  and  by  other  means, 
and  of  reducing  the  number  of  rabbits  by  traps  and  poisons.  It  is 
believed  that  young  trees  in  orchards  and  in  forest  reserves,  where 
they  are  particularly  liable  to  destruction  by  rabbits,  can  be  cheaply 
and  efficiently  protected  by  cylinders  of  woven  wire,  and  experiments 
arc  being  undertaken  in  cooperation  with  the  Forest  Service  for  test- 
ing- the  efficiency  of  such  protectors.  Babbits  in  various  parts  of  the 
country  appear  to  be  peculiarly  susceptible  to  epidemic  diseases,  and 
as  they  are  one  of  our  most  destructive  rodents  special  efforts  are 
being-  made  to  detect  the  presence  of  one  of  these  epidemics  for  the 
purpose  of  securing  cultures  as  a  means  of  reducing  their  numbers. 

THE    BOLL    WEEVIL. 

During  the  year  investigations  were  continued  in  the  Texas  cotton 
districts  with  reference  to  birds  that  feed  upon  the  weevil.  The 
results  are  encouraging.  In  all,  28  species  of  birds  have  been  found  to 
be  more  or  less  active  enemies  of  the  insect.  Included  in  this  number 
is  the  nighthawk,  heretofore  not  known  to  eat  the  weevil.  The  night- 
hawk  proves  to  be  an  active  consumer  of  the  insect.  Its  protection  by 
law  therefore  is  earnestl}'  recommended.  This  is  all  the  more  neces- 
sary, since  the  bird  is  often  shot  for  food. 

Of  all  the  birds  that  prey  upon  the  weevil,  orioles  are  the  most 
active  and  persistent.  For  this  reason  the  possible  introduction  into 
the  Gulf  States  of  one  or  more  additional  species  of  these  birds  is 
being  considered.  Only  one  of  the  three  species  that  visit  the  cotton- 
producing  belt  breeds  extensively  within  it;  hence  if  one  is  introduced 
it  should  be  a  species  likely  to  make  its  summer  home  within  the  area 
infested  by  the  weevil,  as  all  birds  are  particularly  assiduous  in  their 
search  for  insects  during  the  time  they  are  feeding  the  young. 

CALIFORNIA    FRUIT    ORCHARDS!. 

Work  in  the  California  fruit  orchards  is  being  continued  and  a  study 
made  of  the  food  habits  of  birds  destructive  to  orchard  fruit,  with  a 
view  to  the  suggestion  of  preventive  measures. 

Careful  investigations  are  being  conducted  also  into  the  food  habits 
of  all  birds  that  live  in  and  around  orchards,  so  that  the  orchardist 
may  be  clearly  informed  as  to  the  beneficial  species,  in  order  that  he 
may  be  able  to  discriminate  between  friends  and  foes. 

HALE    INSECTS. 

Few  kinds  of  insects  are  so  inimical  to  the  health  and  existence  of 
fruit  trees  and  other  crop  plants  as  the  scales,  and  owing-  to  their  small 
size  and  peculiar  habits  few  are  so  diffcult  to  cope  with.  It  has  been 
generally  supposed  that  birds  lend  no  assistance  in  the  destruction  of 
scales.     This  proves  to  be  an  error,  for  the  Biological  Survey  has 


92  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

already  found  that  more  than  50  species  of  birds  eat  scale  insects.  Not 
only  is  thi>  true,  bat  in  the  case  of  certain  species,  as  the  grosbeaks, 
scales  have  been  ascertained  to  form  a  large  percentage  of  the  food. 

GAME    PROTECTION    AND    INTRODUCTION. 

The  experience  of  many  countries  proves  how  widespread  is  the 
desire  to  introduce  foreign  mammals  and  birds.  When  these  are 
merely  for  cage  pets  or  for  exhibition  in  zoological  collections,  little 
or  no  harm  results.  But  when,  as  frequently  happen.-,  exotic  species 
are  liberated  in  the  hope  that  they  will  become  acclimated  and  form 
permanent  additions  to  the  fauna,  there  is  always  danger  that,  like  the 
English  sparrow,  they  will  be  only  too  successful  in  adapting  them- 
selves to  the  new  environment  and  prove  serious  pests.  The  disas- 
trous experiments  of  Jamaica.  Porto  Rico.  Hawaii.  New  Zealand, 
Australia,  and  other  regions  abundantly  illustrate  this  danger.  Sev- 
eral countries  take  the  precaution  of  regulating  such  importations, 
the  United  States  among  the  number.  Since  1900  the  Department  of 
Agriculture  has  supervised  all  importations  of  live  birds  and  mammals 
into  the  United  States.  A  few  well-known  species  of  birds  and  mam- 
mals are  allowed  to  enter  without  special  authorization,  but  all  others 
are  refused  entry  except  under  permit  by  the  Department.  The  num- 
ber thus  entered  during  the  year  was  651  mammals  274,914  canaries, 
and  47,256  miscellaneous  birds. 

The  growth  of  the  trade  in  imported  birds  is  made  manifest  by  the 
fact  that  the  figures  show  an  increase  of  25  per  cent  over  those  for 
last  year,  and  of  33.  27.  and  37  per  cent,  respectively,  over  those  for 
-1.  1902-3,  and  1901-2.  Despite  the  large  number  of  birds  and 
mammals  imported  under  permit,  averaging  more  than  6,000  a  week 
throughout  the  past  year,  it  is  believed  that  no  prohibited  species  was 
brought  into  the  country. 

Increased  interest  is  shown  in  the  importation  of  foreign  game  birds 
for  stocking  covers.  During  the  year  861  European  partridges,  116 
capercailzie.  73  black  game,  and  59  other  game  birds  were  imported 
for  this  purpose.  Some  of  these  experiments  promise  excellent 
results. 

>tocking  covers  with  birds  hatched  from  imported  eggs  has  hereto- 
fore been  unsuccessful  in  most  cases.  Last  spring,  however,  of  5,564 
ccrg<  imported  under  permit  by  the  Department,  5,500  were  English 
pheasant  eggs  secured  by  the  game  commissioner  of  Illinois,  who 
reports  that  3,000  live,  healthy  chicks  were  obtained — an  unusually 
large  percentage. 

Large  shipments  of  birds  are  examined  by  inspectors  and  the  number 
and  kinds  are  reported  to  the  Department.  The  expense  of  fees  has 
hitherto  been  borne  by  importers,  since  no  appropriation  for  the  pur- 
pose was  made  by  Congress.     This  arrangement  proved  unsatisfactory 


EEPOET    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  93 

and  protest  was  made  by  importers.  Since  February  1.  1906,  the 
Department  has  undertaken  to  pay  these  fees,  and  an  appropriation 
should  be  made  to  sustain  the  service,  as  in  the  case  of  inspection  of 
meats.  The  lack  of  such  appropriation  permits  inspection  onlv  of  the 
most  important  shipment-. 

INTERSTATE    COMMERCE    IX    GAME. 

The  close  surveillance  of  interstate  traffic  in  game  established  in  the 
Middle  West  has  driven  illegal  shippers  to  the  use  of  freight  instead 
of  express,  and  has  brought  the  situation  in  that  region  under  partial 
control.  Attention  will  therefore  be  centered  during  the  coming  year 
on  the  Southwest,  where  systematic  violations  of  the  law  are  frequent. 
An  effort  will  be  made  also  to  check  numerous  illegal  shipments  that 
occur  in  the  South,  particularly  in  West  Virginia.  Virginia,  and  North 
Carolina. 

The  limited  means  available  for  this  work  make  progress  slow  and 
difficult.  A  sufficient  sum  should  be  appropriated  to  permit  the 
employment  of  three  supervisors,  at  Chicago,  St.  Louis,  and  Balti- 
more, respectively,  to  study  conditions,  secure  evidence  of  illegalities, 
assist  prosecuting  officers,  and  aid  generally  in  a  more  effective 
enforcement  of  the  law. 

BIRD    RESERVATIONS. 

One  of  the  most  successful  methods  of  preserving  the  birds  of  a 
country  is  by  setting  aside  regions  that  contain  important  colonies  of 
breeding  birds  as  bird  reservations  or  '"refuges."  England.  Aus- 
tralia. Canada.  New  Zealand,  and  other  countries  have  followed  this 
plan  with  great  success,  and  in  1903  the  United  States  inaugurated  it 
by  making  a  bird  reservation  of  Pelican  Island,  Florida,  to  preserve 
the  only  colony  of  brown  pelicans  on  the  east  coast  of  Florida. 
Afterward-  two  more  reservations  were  established — Breton  Island, 
Louisiana,  and  Stump  Lake.  North  Dakota — and  in  the  year  just 
ended  four  more  were  added  to  the  list,  two  in  Florida,  consisting  of 
Pas-age  and  Indian  keys,  at  the  mouth  of  Tampa  Bay,  and  two  in 
Michigan,  comprising  the  Huron  Islands  and  the  Siskiwit  Islands  in 
Lake  Huron. 

These  reservations  contain  large  colonies  of  water  birds — ducks. 
gulls,  terns,  pelican-,  etc. — and  their  establishment  will  serve  to  pre- 
serve  certain  native  species  from  possible  extermination  and  provide 
favorable  places  for  the  study  of  bird  life.  It  has  been  found  essen- 
tial to  have  Federal  authority  to  punish  trespassers  instead  of  depend- 
ing on  varying  State  laws,  and  accordinglv.  at  the  suggestion  of  this 
Department.  Congress  passed  an  act  (approved  June  29,  1906)  provid- 
ing a  penalty  for  trespass  on  bird  and  game  reservations.  This  law 
will  enable  the  wardens  on  bird  reservations  to  protect  them  from 
marauders. 


94  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


BIG 


It  is  gratifying  to  state  that  part  of  the  herd  of  dwarf  elk  presented 
to  the  Government  by  Miller  and  Lux  was  successfully  transferred  to 
the  Sequoia  National  Park  in  November.  1905,  thus  insuring  the  pres- 
ervation of  this  rare  speeies. 

It  is  now  possible,  also,  to  transfer  to  an  ideal  buffalo  range  in  the 
Wichita  game  preserve  the  herd  of  buffalo  offered  to  the  Department 
by  the  New  York  Zoological  Society,  as  Congress  at  its  recent  session 
appropriated  $15,000  for  the  construction  of  the  fence  necessary  for  a 
proper  Enclosure. 

The  plan  of  preserving  big  game  from  extermination  by  providing 
game  refuges  where  shooting  is  either  prohibited  or  carefully  regu- 
lated is  at  present  attracting  attention  all  over  the  world.  In  order  to 
profit  by  the  experience  of  other  countries  in  a  matter  that  must  soon 
be  of  pressing  interest  in  the  United  States,  investigation  has  been 
made  of  the  systems  employed  in  Canada,  particularly  Ontario  and 
Quebec,  the  Transvaal.  Natal.  British  East  Africa.  Sudan,  and  Cape 
Colony.  This  work  has  been  carried  on  by  correspondence  and  will 
be  continued  and  extended  during  the  coming  year. 


GAME    PROTECTION"    IN"    ALASKA. 


The  preservation  of  the  game  of  Alaska  continues  to  present  dif- 
ficult problems.  With  the  present  unsatisfactory  game  law,  and  no 
appropriation  available  for  enforcing  its  provisions,  the  efforts  of  the 
Department  have  been  confined  to  preventing  export  of  heads  and 
skins  by  trophy  hunters  and  dealers  in  hides,  a  fruitful  source  of 
destruction. 

INFORMATION"    CONCERNING    GAME. 

In  performance  of  the  important  duty  of  collecting  and  disseminat- 
ing information  relating  to  game,  the  annual  summary  of  game  1 
posters  of  close  seasons,  and  directory  of  officers  and  organizations 
concerned  in  the  protection  of  game  have  been  published  as  usual,  and 
also  various  pamphlet*  relating  to  special  features  of  game  protection. 
In  the  near  future  it  is  intended  to  secure  and  publish  information 
concerning  hunting-license  statistics,  game  refuges  and  preserves, 
introduction  and  propagation  of  game  birds,  duties  of  the  modern 
game  warden,  and  the  cage-bird  traffic  of  the  United  States. 

The  constant  demand  for  information  on  these  and  kindred  mat: 
shows  how  important  is  this  phase  of  the  work.     It  is  impossible  to 
meet  this  demand  satisfactorily  with  the  present  limited  force  and 
available  means,  and  an  increase  in  both  is  much  needed. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  95 

DIVISION  OF  PUBLICATIONS. 

The  work  of  the  Division  of  Publications  continues  inevitably  to 
increase  with  the  growth  of  the  Department.  The  number  of  publi- 
cations issued  in  1904  was  372;  in  19G&,  1. "7:2:  and  in  1906,  1.171. 
The  somber  of  copies  Issued  in  1S06  aggregated  13,1SS.021.  The 
larger  proportion  of  these  publications  consisted  of  reprints,  but  the 
new  publications  in  1906,  exclusive  of  those  of  the  Weather  Bureau, 
numbered  111. 

FARMERS*    BULLETINS 

The  total  number  of  issues  of  Farmers'  Bulletins  during  the  tiscal 
year  was  137.  of  which  404  were  reprint-,  and  the  total  number  of 
copies  was  6^*68,000, 

The  demand  for  Farmers'  Bulletins  by  Senators  and  Representa- 
tives, who  under  the  law  are  entitled  to  SO  per  cent  of  the  whole 
number  printed,  has  been  so  much  larger  than  usual  that  practically 
none  were  left  to  carry  over  to  the  present  tiscal  year.  There  being 
therefore  no  surplus  available  and  the  appropriation  for  the  current 
tiscal  year  being  no  larger  than  formerly,  the  number  available  for 
each  Congressman  will  this  year  be  greatly  reduced.  1  have  there- 
fore felt  obliged  to  include  provision  for  an  increase  in  the  number 
of  these  bulletins  in  my  estimates  for  the  ensuing  year.  The  num- 
ber of  copies  of  Farmers'  Bulletins  distributed  during  the  past  year 
on  Congressional  orders  aggregated  .3.i'7'.,.17t'>. 

A  DVLSORY    COMMITTEE. 

On  January  i!3.  1906,  in  accordance  with  your  Executive  order  of 
the  30th  of  that  month.  I  appointed  an  advisory  committee  on  the  sub- 
ject of  printing  and  publication,  as  follows:  The  Assistant  Secretary, 
chairman;  the  Chief  of  the  Weather  Bureau,  and  the  Department 
Editor,  secretary.  The  rules  laid  down  for  the  guidance  of  the  com- 
mittee in  the  Executive  order  referred  to,  conform  so  closely  to  the 
regulations  governing  the  printing  and  binding  of  this  Department 
imposed  upon  the  Division  of  Publications,  of  which  the  Department 
Editor  is  the  chief,  that  it  was  not  found  necessary  by  the  committee 
to  adopt  a  different  system  of  work  or  to  recommend  many  changes  in 
the  existing  orders.  The  services  of  the  committee  were,  however, 
extremely  helpful  in  disposing  of  many  questions  submitted  to  it  by 
the  Department  Editor,  which  would  otherwise  have  called  for  my 
personal  intervention.  I'p  to  date  the  committee  has  held  ten  meet- 
ings, not  at  stated  times,  but  at  the  call  of  the  chairman  whenever 
questions  of  importance  were  ready  to  be  submitted  to  it. 


96  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AGRICULTURE. 

BSSIOirAIi    PUBLICATION-. 

S    .eral   important  amendment-  to  the  law  governing  the  public 
printing  and  binding  have  resulted  from  the  special  investigation  con- 
ducted 1'  int  Committee  on  Printing  of  the  Senate  and  House. 
One  of  these  provides  that  the  nr-t  cost  of  all  publications  known  as 
-ional  publications  shall  be  charged  to  the  printing  fund  of 
the  Department  itself  instead  of  to  the  appropriation  for  the  printing 
and  binding  for.  Cong:  ess,  I    _rether  with  the  cost  of  the  copies  assigned 
fcary  for  Departmental  use.     This  has  made  it  necessary. 
of  course,  1     -     are  an  i:  -     in  the  appropriation  for  printing  for 
:  this  Department,  and  the  additional  amount  estimated,  as 
above  made  n              y.  has  been  duly  appropriated  by  Congress.    This, 
in  reality,  is  not  an  increase,  but  a  transfer  from  one  fund  to  another. 
Another  amendment  provides  that  public  documents  ordered  printed 
—  may  be  printed  in  two  or  more  editions  not  exceeding 
in  the  aggregate  the  total  number  authorized  by  law.     This  provision 
applies  not  only  to  the  number  assigned  to  the  use  of  Congress,  but 
to  the  number  assigned  to  the  use  of  the  Department.     This 
amendment   will  doubtless  tend   greatly  to   prevent  waste  by  over- 
publication. 

LIMITATION    OF    APPROPRIATION    FOR   PRINTING. 

A  further  amendment  to  the  law  provides  that  estimates  for  the 
printing  and  binding  of  each  Department  shall  be  included  in  a  single 
item,  and  that  after  the  expiration  of  the  current  fiscal  year  no  appro- 
priations other  than  those  made  specifically  and  solely  for  the  printing 
and  binding  shall  be  used  for  such  purposes.  In  this  connection.  I 
topi  -f  on  record  as  strongly  favoring  the  inclusion  of 

the  appropriation  for  printing  and  binding  in  the  regular  appropria- 
tion bill  for  the  support  of  this  Department,  instead  of  being,  as  now, 
included  in  a  separate  appropriation  in  the  sundry  civil  bill  for  the 
general  printing  and  binding  of  the  Government. 

INCREASING    DEMAND    FOR    PUBLICATIONS. 

T:.e  demands  for  publications  continue  to  increase  more  rapidly 
than  does  the  ability  of  the  Department  to  meet  them.  The  policy 
followed  in  the  past  of  continuing  the  distribution  after  supplying  the 
.  d  Jar  divisional  lists,  including  libraries,  agricultural  colleges,  and 
stations,  exchanges — foreign  and  domestic — and  persons  actively  coop- 
erating in  the  work  of  the  Department,  to  all  miscellaneous  appli- 
cants until  the  edition  was  exhausted,  and  then  ordering  a  reprint  to 
satisfy  further  demands,  while  perhaps  the  best  method  to  be  pursued 


REPORT    OF   THE    SECRETARY.  97 

in   any  plan  of   unlimited   gratuitous  distribution,  was  found  verv 
unsatisfactory. 

In  the  first  place,  the  funds  at  our  disposal  precluded  the  possibility 
of  unlimited  reprints,  and  thus,  while  a  great  many  persons  were  sup- 
plied who  undoubtedly  did  not  need  the  publications  they  asked  for.  a 
large  number  of  persons  to  Avhom  the  publications  would  prove  useful 
were  unavoidably  left  unsupplied,  including  very  often  persons  whose 
services  to  the  Department  gave  them  a  special  claim  on  us  for  our 
publications.  Such  a  plan  might  have  been  satisfactory  enough  in  the 
days  when  the  demand  for  the  Department's  publications  was  not  so 
great,  though  even  then  it  was  wasteful;  but  at  the  present  time  to 
undertake  to  supply  all  miscellaneous  applicants — and  this  is  the  only 
fair  way  if  the  principle  of  gratuitous  distribution  is  to  obtain — 
would  involve  a  cost  far  exceeding  any  sum  which  Congress  is  likely 
to  provide.  In  the  face  of  the  difficulty  thus  presented  to  me  for 
solution,  I  concluded  to  abandon  any  attempt  at  general  gratuitous 
distribution  of  all  Department  publications  other  than  Farmers'  Bul- 
letins and  circulars. 

FIRST   EDITIONS. 

On  April  14,  1906,  I  issued  a  general  order  which  limited  the  first 
edition  of  every  publication  to  the  number  of  copies  necessary  to 
supply  libraries,  educational  institutions,  the  press,  State  and  foreign 
officials  connected  with  agriculture,  exchanges,  and  such  persons  as 
render  tangible  service  to  the  Department,  either  by  actively  cooperat- 
ing in  its  work  or  as  special  correspondents,  and  including-  a  small 
number  to  be  reserved  for  emergencies  and  for  use  in  correspondence, 
and  to  furnish  a  small  supply  to  be  placed  in  the  hands  of  the  Super- 
intendent of  Documents  for  sale.  I  am  indebted  to  the  courtesy  of 
this  official  for  the  subjoined  statement,  showing  the  total  number  of 
the  publications  of  this  Department  sold  by  him  during  the  last  fiscal 
year  and  the  sums  received  therefor,  and,  for  purposes  of  comparison, 
the  total  number  sold  of  all  Government  publications  and  the  amount 
received: 

Publications  of  Department  of  Agriculture copies. .  47,  745 

Amount  received  therefor $5,  388.  28 

All  Government  publications _ copies..  75,828 

Amount  received  therefor $16,  495.  88 

REPRINTS   BY    THE    SUPERINTENDENT    OF    DOCUMENTS. 

I  am  also  indebted  to  the  Superintendent  of  Documents  for  a  report 
showing  that  under  the  provisions  of  joint  resolution  No.  11.  approved 
March  28, 1901,  and  with  the  concurrence  of  this  office,  as  therein  pro- 
vided, 13  reprints  of  Department  publications  were  ordered  by  him  from 
the  Public  Printer  during  the  year  ending  June  30, 1906,  in  editions  of 
3    a  1906 7 


98  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OP    AGRICULTURE. 

from  100  to  1,500  copies,  in  order  to  satisfy  the  requests  of  purchas- 
ers. Under  the  terms  of  the  resolution  referred  to,  these  reprints, 
which  aggregated  over  10,000  copies,  were  paid  for  from  the  funds 
received  by  the  Superintendent  of  Documents  from  the  sale  of  our 
publications.  This  sale  of  Government  publications  under  the  pro- 
visions of  the  resolution,  which  authorize  him  to  reprint  as  occasion 
requires,  defraying  the  cost  of  same  from  the  sums  received  by  him 
as  purchase  money,  affords  the  most  equitable  plan  for  the  distribu- 
tion of  these  publications  to  miscellaneous  applicants.  It  involves  no 
waste,  meets  the  requirements  of  all  parties  interested  at  a  minimum 
cost  to  the  Government,  and  provides  for  a  supply  adequate  to  any 
ole  demand. 
To  make  this  system  a  complete  success  requires  the  extensive 
advertising  of  the  existence  of  these  publications,  and  to  this  end  this 
Department  supplies  each  month  to  all  persons  desiring  it  a  list  of  the 
publications  issued  during  the  month  previous.  By  this  means,  and 
through  the  intelligent  courtesy  of  the  press,  our  publications  are  widely 
advertised.  A  second  requirement  is,  in  my  opinion,  that  these  pub- 
lications should  be  sold  at  cost  of  paper,  printing,  and  binding,  the 
cost  of  the  first  edition,  which  includes  the  making  of  the  plates,  being 
properly  defrayed  by  the  Government.  Another  great  convenience 
would  be  afforded  to  intending  purchasers  if  the  Superintendent 
of  Documents  were  authorized  to  receive  postage  stamps  as  cash. 
This  is  especially  true  where  the  sums  involved  amount  to  or  include 
fractions  of  a  dollar. 

DEMAXD    FOR   PUBLICATIONS    BY    EDUCATIONAL    INSTITUTIONS. 

A  great  many  demands  are  being  made  upon  us  by  educational  insti- 
tutions for  publications  of  this  Department  to  be  used  as  text-books, 
and  as  these  demands  usually  involve  supplying  whole  classes  of  stu- 
dents with  the  same  publication,  the  question  promises  to  present  some 
difficulties.  Heretofore  I  have  made  it  a  point  to  grant  such  requests, 
but  how  long  I  can  continue  to  do  so  gratuitously,  in  the  face  of 
rapidly  increasing  demands  of  this  character,  is  problematical.  In 
many  cases,  especially  where  there  has  been  cooperation  between  State 
institutions  and  this  Department,  the  number  desired  is  so  great  that 
the  parties  themselves  desire  the  privilege  of  purchasing  hundreds, 
and  sometimes  thousands,  of  copies. 

Under  the  law  regulating  such  matters  the  Public  Printer  is  author- 
ized to  sell  not  more  than  250  copies  to  any  individual,  and  the  appli- 
cant must  tile  his  order  before  the  publication  goes  to  press.  In  the 
-  I  refer  to.  this  number  is  generally  inadequate,  and  moreover  it 
is  impossible  to  comply  with  the  condition.  There  is  then  left  to  the 
institution  or  official  desiring  the  publications  the  alternative  of  pur- 
chasing the  plates,  with  a  view  naturally  to  saving  the  cost  of  composi- 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  99 

tion.  Under  the  law  no  saving-  can  be  effected  in  this  way.  The  Public 
Printer  is  compelled  to  charge  not  only  the  cost  of  the  metal  in  making 
the  plates,  but  also  the  original  cost  of  composition.  I  would  suggest 
an  amendment  to  the  law,  authorizing  the  Public  Printer  to  supply 
duplicate  plates  of  Government  publications  at  the  cost  of  such  dupli- 
cation, with  10  per  cent  added  for  handling,  to  all  applicants  duly 
indorsed  by  the  head  of  the  Department  issuing  the  publication. 

BUKEAU  OF  STATISTICS. 
SUMMARY    OF   THE    WORK    DURING    THE    YEAR. 

The  work  of  the  Bureau  of  Statistics  is  performed  in  three  divisions: 
(1)  The  Division  of  Domestic  Crop  Reports,  (2)  the  Division  of  Foreign 
Markets.  (3)  the  Miscellaneous  Division. 

As  in  former  years,  the  principal  work  of  the  Bureau  of  Statistics 
has  been  the  collection  and  dissemination  of  information  regarding  the 
acreage,  condition,  and  yield  of  the  principal  agricultural  crops  of  the 
United  Stat*  s. 

The  Division  of  Domestic  Crop  Reports  handles  the  great  mass  of 
reports  received  from  month  to  month  by  the  Bureau  for  the  use  of 
the  Statistician  and  the  Crop  Reporting  Board  in  preparing  the  esti- 
mates of  the  Bureau. 

The  work  accomplished  in  this  Division  is  supplemented  by  reports 
received  from  salaried  State  statistical  agents,  one  of  whom  is  located 
in  each  State,  and  from  special  field  agents  who  travel  within  and 
throughout  defined  territory,  consisting  of  two  or  more  States,  exam- 
ining the  crops  in  the  field  and  securing  information  for  the  use  of  the 
Bureau  from  all  available  sources,  such  as  country  bankers,  agricul- 
tural implement  dealers,  representative  farmers,  country  merchants, 
and  others. 

During  the  year  the  scope  of  this  work  has  been  very  greatly 
broadened,  the  increase  being  approximately  100  per  cent.  Twenty- 
live  crops  not  previously  dealt  with  by  the  Bureau  have  been  added, 
concerning  which  reports  of  condition  are  made  from  month  to  month. 
This  has  taxed  the  working  capacity  of  the  clerical  force  of  the  Bureau, 
and  has  rendered  it  necessary  that  they  be  required  to  do  considerable 
work  above  and  beyond  the  regular  hours  of  service  ordinarily  required. 

The  special  field  service  of  the  Bureau  of  Statistics,  as  well  as  the 
corps  of  State  statistical  agents,  has  been  considerably  strengthened 
and  the  work  of  these  employees  has  been  placed  upon  a  uniform, 
scientilic  basis,  such  as  did  not  formerly  prevail.  The  reports  of  the 
Bureau  and  the  methods  employed  in  making  them  seem  to  have  met 
with  general  approval,  and  have  largely  increased  the  confidence  of 
producers,  consumers,  dealers,  and  the  public  generally  in  their 
integrity  and  accuracy. 


100  YEARBOOK    OF    THE   DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

In  order  to  prevent  the  possibility  of  information  regarding  the 
reports  of  the  Bureau  being  prematurely  given  out,  methods  have  been 
adopted  which  render  such  leakages  impossible.  These  are  explained 
and  described  in  detail  in  the  annual  report  of  the  Statistician  of  the 
Bureau.  The  value  of  the  monthly  crop  reports  of  this  Bureau  has 
been  so  thoroughly  established  that  any  suggestion  looking  to  their 
curtailment  meets  with  vigorous  objection  and  opposition  from  all  who 
are  interested  in  the  promulgation  of  fair,  unbiased  estimates  regard- 
ing acreages,  conditions,  and  yields  of  the  products  of  agriculture. 

The  Division  of  Foreign  Markets  compiles  information  regarding 
the  imports  and  exports  of  all  the  different  classes  of  farm  products; 
also  of  manufactured  products  as  far  as  the  output  of  packing  houses 
.can  be  so  denominated.  The  information  thus  gathered  is  published 
annually  in  bulletins,  to  which  wide  circulation  is  given.  In  addition 
to  this  regular  work,  studies  are  made  of  conditions  in  countries  com- 
peting with  the  United  States  in  the  world's  markets,  with  regard  to 
packing-house  products  and  meat  animals,  and  a  large  amount  of 
instructive  matter  has  been  collected  and  published. 

Investigations  have  also  been  conducted  by  this  Division  of  the 
world's  meat  trade;  of  the  comparative  healthfulness  of  meat  animals 
in  different  countries;  of  the  situation  throughout  the  world  with  regard 
to  cotton  production;  of  the  British  market  for  dairy  products  and 
its  sources  of  supply;  wheat  growing  in  Russia;  freight  rates,  and  the 
world's  production  and  trade  in  barley,  rye,  potatoes,  wheat,  tobacco, 
cotton,  and  other  agricultural  products. 

During  the  past  }Tear  a  very  interesting  study  was  consummated 
upon  the  subject  of  the  increase  in  farm  values  in  the  United  States, 
the  results  of  which  have  been  published  in  bulletins  which  have 
attracted  wide  attention  and  interest. 

In  the  Miscellaneous  Division  of  the  Bureau  of  Statistics,  which 
embraces  the  statistical  library,  the  necessary  translations  incident  to 
the  work  are  made;  and  a  few  clerks  are  engaged  in  special  work, 
such  as  the  compiling  and  preparing  of  material  to  be  used  in  answer- 
ing inquiries  for  agricultural  statistics  made  by  Members  of  Congress 
and  others.  The  services  of  the  .clerks  in  this  Division  are  called  into 
requisition  in  the  tabulation  and  computation  of  the  monthly  crop 
reports,  or  for  any  other  purpose  for  which  they  may  be  required. 

An  employee  of  the  Bureau  of  Statistics  is  stationed  in  London  and 
from  that  point  makes  trips  to  the  different  European  countries,  col- 
lecting information  regarding  crop  acreages,  conditions,  and  yields, 
which  he  sends  to  Washington  each  month  for  publication  in  the  Crop 
Reporter,  a  monthly  publication  of  the  Bureau,  in  which  are  given  the 
reports  of  the  Bureau,  placed  in  comparison  with  reports  for  previous 
37ears  at  the  corresponding  dates,  together  with  various  other  statis- 
tical information  of  interest  to  farmers  and  dealers  in  and  cousumers  of 
farm  products. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  101 

Much  statistical  work  in  the  way  of  tabulation  and  computation 
has  been  done  for  other  Bureaus  of  the  Department,  and  though  the 
regular  work  has  been  greatly  increased  through  the  enlargement  of  its 
scope,  all  the  statistical  service  required  by  other  Bureaus  has  been 
accomplished  promptly  and  satisfactorily.  The  work  of  the  Depart- 
ment is  being-  unified  and  made  cooperative  in  man}-  lines  of  research 
and  demonstration. 

Investigations  have  been  carried  on  through  a  series  of  years  regard- 
ing the  cost  of  producing  farm  products,  and  results  of  these  investi- 
gations have  been  embodied  in  bulletins,  which,  it  is  believed,  will  be 
of  great  value  and  interest. 

THE  LIBRARY. 

The  growth  of  the  Library  has  exceeded  that  of  an  v  previous  }Tear, 
so  that  at  present  the  scientists  of  the  Department  have  available  for 
their  use  a  collection  of  scientific  books,  periodicals,  and  pamphlets 
numbering  over  92,000.  All  new  publications  of  value  relating  to 
general  agriculture  and  to  special  subjects  concerning  which  investi- 
gations are  being  carried  on  b}r  the  Department  have  been  purchased, 
over  500  periodicals  alone  being  received  regularl}\  This  Library  is 
gradually  growing  to  be  the  most  complete  collection  of  agricultural 
literature  in  the  country.  Many  valuable  purchases  and  gifts  have 
been  included  in  the  5,000  additions  of  the  past  year.  For  the  advance- 
ment of  work  in  connection  with  food  and  drug  regulations,  meat 
inspection,  and  game  protection  an  unusual  amount  has  been  expended 
for  law  books  and  other  works  published  in  this  country  and  abroad 
relative  to  these  subjects.  EvenT  new  line  of  work  entered  upon  by 
the  Department  makes  a  correspondingly  new  demand  upon  the 
Library. 

t  CATALOGUING. 

The  card  catalogue  of  160,000  author  and  subject  entries  is  the  most 
valuable  key  to  the  resources  of  the  Library.  The  cataloguing  has 
been  kept  up  to  date,  so  that  the  material  on  a  given  subject  is  readily 
available.  Cooperation  with  the  Library  of  Congress  and  with  other 
institutions  which  print  cards  has  enabled  the  Library  to  secure  a  larger 
number  of  printed  cards  for  its  catalogue  than  ever  before.  These 
cards  are  not  onl}-  for  books  and  pamphlets  of  its  own,  but  maivy  show 
what  may  be  found  on  subjects  of  interest  to  this  Department  in  other 
departmental  libraries.  By  this  means  the  scope  of  the  catalogue  is 
largel}r  increased  at  the  least  cost  of  time  and  mone}T. 

The  cataloguing  of  the  publications  of  the  Department  has  progressed 
from  year  to  year  until  now  there  is  a  card  catalogue  to  these  documents 
up  to  the  latest  bulletin  issued.  These  cards  are  valued  by  all  libraries 
receiving  our  publications  regularly,  affording  as  they  do  the  only 


LQ2  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMEXT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

up-to-date  means  of  reference  to  all  author-  and  subjects  of  the  publi- 

On  account  of  the  ii  ?  demands  for  this  catalogue  and 

of  the  la  rary  for  handling  and  storing  the  cards,  it 

been  found  advi-  I  :;sfer  the  printing  and  distribution  of 

care-  rary  of  C      _.    --.     This  cooperation  has  given  satis- 

factory results  in  the  advancement  of  the  work. 

t  only  is  the  Library  indispensable  in  connection  with  the  work  of 
the  Department,  but  much  work  has  been  done  in  it  by  visiting  spe- 
cialists, and  to  many  agricultural  colleges,  and  experiment  stations 
temporary  loans  of  publications  not  elsewhere  to  be  found  in  the 
been  made. 

OFFICE   OF  EXPERIMENT  STATIONS. 
SELAT1        -         :  .  ITDBAIi    EXPERIMENT    STATI 

Tie  great  value  of  the  agricultural  experiment  stations  as  agencies 
for  the  advancement  of  agriculture  through  scientific  research  was 
gnized  by  Congress  in  a  signal  manner  during  the  past  year  by 
age  of  the  Adam-  A     .     This  measure,  introduced  and  cham- 
pioned 1  Hon.  Henry  Oullen  Adam-,  of  Wisconsin,  had  the 
unanimous  appr  he  committees  on  agriculture  in  both  He 

d   in   C      jj      sa     without   a   dissenting   vote,    and   received    the 
r  jval  of  the  I  arch  16, 1906.    It  provides  that  each  State 

and  Territory  shall  annually  receive  from  the  National  Treasury  a 
grant  of  money  in  addition  to  that  given  for  the  establishment  and  main- 
tenance of  agricultural  experiment  stations  by  the  act  of  March  2, 
1887    Harch  Act  .     The  initial  appropriation  to  each  State  under  the 

1  for  the  fiscal  year  1906.  To  this  amount  $3 
3  be  added  each  year  for  five  years,  after  which  an  appropriation 
is  (  ontinue  annually.  Thus  in  1911  and  each  year  there- 
after each  Si  will  receiv<  j  .  double  the  amount  hitherto 
granted  under  the  Hatch  Act.  The  new  act  recognizes  the  fact  that 
through  previous  National  and  S  legislation  the  stations  are 
thoroughly  organized,  are  equipped  with  lands  and  buildings,  and  have 
funds  for  the  printing  and  di              ion  of  publications. 

-ion  and  strengthening  of  th  ;nental  work  of  the 

herefore  made  the  sole  object  of  the  Adams  Act,  and  the 

additional  funds  are  "to  be  applied  only  to  paying  the   necessary 

-   of   con  o   original  lies  or  experiments  bearing 

directly  on  the  agricultural   industry  of  the   Unite  -."     The 

Adams  fund  is  thus  essentially  a  research  fund,  and  if  properly  used 

Id  produce  2  the  greatest  and  most   permanent  value  to 

rican  agriculture.     The  Stal     experiment  .-"  ave  already 

performed  service  of  great  value.     They  have  done  much  to  secure 

radical  and  wid-  -_  ats  in  agricultural  pra  they 

have  contributed  in  lar^e  mc  ition  of  a  new  American 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  103 

literature  of  agriculture  and  made  it  available  to  every  farmer;  they 
have  collected  much  of  the  material  from  which  a  science  of  agricul- 
ture is  being  formulated  as  the  basis  for  the  instruction  of  successive 
generations  of  farmers  in  colleges,  schools,  and  farmers'  institutes. 
As  their  work  has  developed,  it  has  naturally  divided  itself  into  several 
broad  classes,  which  may  be  briefly  summarized  as  (1)  original  research; 
(2)  verification  and  demonstration  experiments,  often  of  a  local  char- 
acter and  import;  (3)  inspection  service;  and  (1)  dissemination  of  infor- 
mation. So  great  has  been  the  local  pressure  for  work  of  the  last 
three  classes  that  by  far  the  greatest  share  of  the  National  and  State 
funds  has  been  spent  in  these  lines.  The  Adams  fund  now  comes  in 
to  enable  the  stations  to  broaden  and  deepen  their  original  researches, 
on  the  results  of  which  largely  depends  the  success  of  their  other  work. 

Previous  to  the  passage  of  the  Adams  Act  the  funds  of  the  stations 
from  sources  within  the  States  had  steadily  increased,  until  in  1905 
they  exceeded  the  revenue  derived  from  the  National  Treasury. 
There  is  every  reason  to  believe  that  the  States  and  local  communities 
will  continue  to  deal  liberally  with  the  stations,  and  that  thus  they 
will  be  able  to  extend  their  more  popular  and  directly  practical  work. 
The  United  States  will  thus  have  a  much  more  thorough  and  compre- 
hensive s}Tstem  of  agricultural  experiment  stations. 

Congress  having  put  in  my  hands  the  administration  of  the  Adams 
Act,  I  have  assigned  to  the  Office  of  Experiment  Stations  the  duty  of 
dealing  with  the  experiment  stations  in  matters  relating  to  this  act. 

The  untimely  death  of  Mr.  Adams  has  taken  away  one  of  the  fore- 
most leaders  in  the  cause  of  agricultural  progress  in  this  country. 
His  clear  insight  into  agricultural  problems  and  needs,  his  thorough 
sympathy  with  farmers,  his  appreciation  of  the  benefits  accruing  to 
agriculture  from  the  work  of  properly  trained  scientists,  his  independ- 
ence of  thought  and  action,  his  fearless  advocacy  of  measures  which 
he  deemed  of  importance  to  agriculture,  his  experience  in  public  life 
both  as  an  administrator  and  as  a  legislator,  his  thorough  honesty, 
which  won  the  respect  and  confidence  even  of  those  who  opposed  him, 
put  him  in  a  position  to  render  the  highest  and  best  service  in  National 
councils  and  legislation.  In  consideration  of  the  important  social  and 
economic  changes  which  our  rural  communities  are  passing  through 
in  these  days,  as  well  as  of  the  vast  material  interests  involved  in  our 
agriculture,  the  loss  of  such  a  leader  is  most  keenly  felt.  Great,  how- 
ever, was  his  achievement  in  the  short  period  in  which  he  was  a  mem- 
ber of  Congress,  for  the  name  of  Representative  Adams,  of  Wisconsin, 
will  ever  be  linked  with  that  of  Senator  Morrill,  of  Vermont,  and  Rep- 
resentative Hatch,  of  Missouri,  as  the  author  of  a  measure  of  funda- 
mental and  permanent  importance  to  the  institutions  which  advance 
and  disseminate  the  knowledge  on  which  our  agricultural  progress 
and  permanent  prosperity  largely  depend. 


104  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

THE    AGRICULTURAL    COLLEGES    AND    SCHOOLS. 

In  response  to  demands  from  numerous  sources  the  work  of  the 
Department  relating  to  agricultural  education  has  been  gradually 
broadened,  until  now  it  touches  nearly  every  phase  of  the  subject. 
This  Department,  through  the  Office  of  Experiment  Stations,  has  been 
active  in  aiding  the  establishment  of  agricultural  high  schools  and  the 
introduction  of  agricultural  subjects  into  the  curricula  of  the  public 
schools.  Representatives  of  that  Office  have  addressed  important  edu- 
cational and  agricultural  meetings  in  the  interests  of  agricultural 
education  in  a  number  of  States,  have  given  advice  regarding  legisla- 
tion and  courses  of  study,  and  have  assisted  in  the  inauguration  of 
agricultural  instruction  and  the  securing  of  agricultural  teachers  in 
different  localities.  The  agricultural  colleges  have  been  visited  and 
conferences  have  been  held  with  their  officers  and  teachers.  A  special 
study  has  been  made  of  the  agricultural  work  in  the  colleges  for 
negroes. 

The  general  interests  of  higher  education  in  agriculture  have  been 
promoted  through  cooperation  with  the  Association  of  American  Agri- 
cultural Colleges  and  Experiment  Stations.  As  chairman  of  the  stand- 
ing committee  on  agricultural  instruction,  the  Director  of  that  Office 
has  aided  in  studies  with  reference  to  the  improvement  of  courses  of 
instruction  in  the  agricultural  colleges  and  schools.  He  has  also  acted 
as  dean  of  the  Graduate  School  of  Agriculture,  which  held  a  second 
successful  session  at  the  University  of  Illinois  the  past  summer.  The 
faculty  of  this  school  consisted  of  35  of  our  leading  agricultural  teach- 
ers* and  experts  from  this  Department  and  the  agricultural  colleges 
and  experiment  stations.  The  students,  drawn  from  34  States  and 
Territories,  were  mainly  the  younger  men  already  engaged  in  agri- 
cultural teaching  and  experimenting. 

With  the  development  of  the  Department's  work  along  educational 
lines  it  has  become  clear  that  it  may  accomplish  important  and  valua- 
ble service  as  a  central  agency  for  the  promotion  of  agricultural  edu- 
cation in  cooperation  with  the  State  departments  of  agriculture  and 
education,  the  agricultural  colleges  and  experiment  stations,  and  the 
State  and  National  agricultural  organizations.  The  most  important 
lines  of  educational  effort  in  which  the  Department  should  engage 
may  be  briefly  outlined  as  follows: 

(1)  To  aid  the  agricultural  colleges  to  reduce  the  results  of  the 
investigations  made  by  this  Department  and  the  experiment  stations 
to  pedagogical  form  for  use  in  agricultural  colleges  and  schools  of  dif- 
ferent grades.  This  work  is  now  proceeding  too  slowly  to  keep  pace 
with  the  accumulation  of  material,  and  the  lack  of  well-ordered 
manuals  and  illustrative  materials  is  a  great  hindrance  to  the  effective 
organization  of  agricultural  instruction. 


REPORT  OF  THE  SECRETARY.  105 

(2)  To  promote  the  efficiency  of  agricultural  instruction  in  the  negro 
land-grant  colleges,  in  order  that  the  funds  granted  for  negro  education 
by  the  Federal  Government  may  contribute  toward  keeping  the  negro 
on  the  farm  and  making  him  a  more  efficient  factor  in  agricultural  pro- 
duction for  his  own  good  and  that  of  the  nation,  rather  than,  as  is 
largely  the  case  at  present,  drawing  him  away  from  the  farm  into  the 
uncertainties  and  dangers  of  city  life. 

(3)  To  aid  the  agricultural  organizations  in  the  several  States  in 
promoting  an  efficient  organization  of  agricultural  high  schools,  con- 
solidated common  schools,  and  other  educational  agencies  best  adapted 
to  secure  a  high  state  of  prosperity  and  contentment  in  rural  life.  It 
is  along  these  lines  that  the  great  educational  effort  of  the  immediate 
future  is  to  be  made.  The  forces  behind  the  movement  for  industrial 
education  have  hitherto  devoted  themselves  very  largely  to  the  pro- 
motion of  instruction  in  the  city  industries.  It  is  now  apparent  that 
a  similar  work  needs  to  be  done  for  the  great  fundamental  industries 
grouped  under  agriculture.  Much  work  will  be  required  to  bring  the 
masses  of  our  agricultural  population  into  sympathetic  touch  with  the 
progressive  movement  in  education  and  to  secure  for  them  a  school 
system  in  harmony  with  their  environment  and  their  relations  to  the 
world's  work  and  civilization.  As  the  nation's  representative  of  agri- 
cultural enlightenment  and  progress,  this  Department  should  be  in  a 
position  to  render  effective  aid  in  this  enterprise,  on  the  success  of 
which  depends  so  largely  the  permanent  prosperity  and  contentment 
of  our  agricultural  people. 

(4)  Since  the  success  of  agricultural  instruction  in  the  public  schools 
will  depend  very  largely  on  the  teachers,  this  Department  should  aid 
the  agricultural  colleges  and  other  State  educational  institutions  in 
preparing  and  inaugurating  training  courses  for  teachers  of  agricul- 
ture in  secondary  and  elementary  schools. 

(5)  Since  agriculture  as  a  fundamental  industry  is  of  vital  impor- 
tance to  all  our  people,  this  Department  should  present  such  results 
of  its  work  and  that  of  the  experiment  stations  at  home  and  abroad  as 
are  adapted  to  instructional  purposes  in  connection  with  nature  study 
and  elementary  agriculture  in  a  form  available  to  teachers  and  pupils 
in  both  country  and  city,  the  object  being  to  impress  our  youth  with 
the  dignity,  value,  and  attractiveness  of  country  life  and  pursuits. 

THE    FARMERS1  INSTITUTES. 

Interest  in  the  farmers'  institutes  continues  to  increase  throughout 
the  country,  and  a  larger  attendance  is  reported  for  the  past  year  than 
ever  before.  The  Department  is  keeping  in  close  touch  with  the 
State  organizations  under  which  the  institutes  are  held,  and  is  especially 
aiding  the  lecturers  to  obtain  up-to-date  information  regarding  the 


106  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

progress  made  in  agricultural  science  and  practice.  In  many  locali- 
ties there  is  a  demand  for  more  extended  and  definite  instruction  than 
can  be  given  in  the  ordinary  institutes.  The  Department  is  therefore 
having  short  courses  of  lectures  prepared  by  experts,  which  may 
used  in  so-called  movable  agricultural  schools.  Inquiry  is  also  being 
made  regarding  the  value  of  various  other  means  more  or  less  exten- 
sively used  for  interesting  farmers  and  their  families  in  improved  prac- 
tice on  their  farms  and  in  their  households.  Representatives  of  the 
Department  have  accompanied  the  special  railroad  trains  which  have 
carried  exhibits  and  lecturers  to  thousands  of  farmers  in  many  parts 
of  the  country,  proving  a  popular  and  effective  mean-  of  awak- 
ening interest  in  the  work  of  the  Department  and  the  experiment 
stations.  The  farmer-;'  institutes  and  other  forms  of  what  is  often 
called  extension  work  in  agricultural  education  are  very  important 
supplements  to  the  publications  of  the  Department  and  the  stations, 
as  well  as  to  the  regular  work  of  the  agricultural  colleges  and  schools. 
The  Department  should  share  in  this  extension  work  and  seek  to  pro- 
mote its  general  inter 

EXPERIMENT    STATIONS    IN    ALASKA,    HAWAII,    AND   PORTO   RICO. 

A  systematic,  effort  has  been  begun  to  determine  the  feasibility  of 
the  live-stock  industry  in  Alaska.  A  small  herd  of  Galloway  cattle 
has  been  purchased  and  located  at  Kenai.  in  Cook  Inlet,  and  at  Wood 
Island.  These  cattle  have  subsisted  during  the  summer  upon  the 
native  grasses,  and  a  considerable  supply  of  grain  hay  has  been  grown 
at  the  Kenai  Station  with  which  to  maintaiu  them  during  the  winter. 
Wheat,  rye.  barley,  and  oats  matured  in  1905  and  1906  at  the  Rampart 
Station  in  the  Yukon  Valley,  but  300  miles  farther  south,  in  the  Copper 
River  Valley,  cold  and  drought  killed  all  but  the  hardiest  varieties  of 
cereals.  A  large  amount  of  grain  hay  was  obtained  at  the  Copper 
Center  Station  and  sold  at  a  highly  remunerative  price.  It  has  been 
shown  that  many  of  the  Alaskan  soils  require  lime,  and  a  method  has 
therefore  been  devised  for  the  cheap  local  production  of  iime  in  small 
quantities.  Arrangements  have  been  made  to  open  a  station  near  the 
prosperous  mining  towns  of  Fairbanks  and  Chena.  on  the  Tanana 
River,  as  soon  as  funds  are  available  for  this  purpose. 

The  Hawaii  :  9  an  increasing  appreciation  of  its  en 

toward  diversifying  the  agricultural  industries  of  the  islands, 
a  direct  result  of  three  years*  experimental  work  with  tobacco  it  is 
said  that  this  year  fully  200  acres  were  planted.  The  discovery  by 
the  station  chemist  that  Hawaiian  feeding  stuffs  are  deficient  in  lime 
is  an  important  one,  and  will  make  it  possible  to  arrange  more  satis- 
factory rations  for  live  stock.  The  investigations  on  the  marketing 
of  tropical  fruits  promise  to  open  markets  in  the  Pacific  coast,  which 
can  best  be  supplied   from  Hawaii.      Investigations  begun  with  the 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  107 

object  of  rehabilitating  the  rice  industry  have  been  so  favorably 
received  that  private  individuals  have  generously  contributed  consid- 
erable sums  of  money  to  aid  in  carrying  them  on. 

The  Porto  Rico  station  is  extending  its  influence,  and  requests  for 
cooperative  work  are  coming  from  numerous  sources.  While  the 
income  of  the  station  has  been  too  limited  to  enable  it  to  meet  these 
demands,  yet  they  show  a  growing  sentiment  in  favor  of  the  station 
which  is  very  encouraging.  The  coffee  experiments  have  begun  to 
show  results,  and  the  improved  methods  of  pruning  and  cultivation  are 
quite  apparent  in  the  increased  yields  obtained.  A  successful  effort 
is  being  made  to  grow  lowland  rice,  and  this  industry  should  be  greatly 
extended.  The  Porto  Bicans  are  large  consumers  of  rice,  most  of 
which  is  now  imported.  Among-  the  forage  crops  experiments  with 
cowpeas  have  been  most  successful,  and  it  is  believed  that  they  can 
be  grown  throughout  the  island.  Numerous  horticultural  experiments 
arc  in  progress,  and  studies  are  being  made  of  insect  pests  and  plant 
diseases. 

The  work  of  the  stations  in  Alaska,  Hawaii,  and  Porto  Rico  is  now 
so  well  established  that  the}'  can  profitabl}-  make  use  of'  increased 
funds.  Considering  the  fact  that  all  buildings,  equipment,  and  live 
stock  must  be  provided  for  these  stations  from  the  Federal  funds,  there 
is  even  greater  need  of  more  liberal  appropriations  for  their  mainte- 
nance than  in  the  ease  of  the  State  experiment  stations.  I* therefore 
recommend  that  an  appropriation  be  given  to  the  stations  in  Alaska, 
Hawaii,  and  Porto  Rico  equal  to  the  amount  given  the  State  stations 
under  the  Hatch  and  Adams  acts. 

PROGRESS   IN    NUTRITION    INVESTIGATIONS. 

The  investigations  on  the  food  and  nutrition  of  man,  conducted  in 
different  States  and  Territories  under  the  auspices  of  the  Office  of 
Experiment  Stations,  have,  as  in  the  past,  been  carried  on  in  coopera- 
tion with  universities  and  other  schools,  as  well  as  public  institutions, 
but  chiefly  with  agricultural  experiment  stations  and  agricultural  col- 
leges. By  this  cooperation  the  Department  funds  have  been  materi- 
ally supplemented  in  various  ways  and  the  scope  and  possibilities  of 
the  work  greatly  increased.  The  chief  object  of  the  investigations  is 
to  learn  the  nutritive  value  of  agricultural  products  of  animal  and 
vegetable  origin  and  the  proportions  in  which  such  food  materials  of 
different  kinds  may  be  most  intelligently  used  to  the  advantage  of 
both  producer  and  consumer.  The  general  policy  has  been  to  under- 
take, in  the  different  centers  of  investigation,  work  for  which  the 
institution  or  region  offered  exceptional  facilities.  Thus,  at  the  Cali- 
fornia Agricultural  Experiment  Station  studies  have  been  undertaken 
with  fruits  and  nuts  and  the  products  made  from  them;  at  the  Minne- 
sota and  Maine  experiment  stations  with  wheat,  corn,  and  other  cereal 
foods;  at  the  University  of  Tennessee  with  cowpeas  and  other  legumes; 


108  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

and  at  Wesleyan  University,  Middletown,  Conn.,  with  cheese  made 
and  cured  in  different  ways.  New  experiments  have  been  undertaken 
whenever  the  finishing-  up  of  any  line  of  work  has  rendered  this  pos- 
sible, and  it  has  been  the  purpose  to  select  for  study  especially  those 
problems  which  have  a  direct  bearing-  upon  agriculture. 

The  experiments  which  have  been  conducted  at  the  California  Agri- 
cultural Experiment  Station  have  furnished  additional  evidence  of  the 
considerable  amount  of  nutritive  material  which  may  be  supplied  in 
readily  digestible  form  by  fruits  and  nuts  intelligently  used  as  part 
of  the  diet.  It  appears  further  that  fruits  and  nuts  are  more  useful 
when  eaten  in  combination  with  other  food  materials  than  in  large 
quantities  by  themselves  or  at  the  end  of  an  otherwise  hearty  meal. 

The  studies  of  cereal  breakfast  foods  undertaken  at  the  Maine  and 
Minnesota  experiment  stations  have  shown  that  different  classes  of 
goods  made  from  the  same  grain  do  not  differ  materially  in  nutritive 
value  though  there  is  a  considerable  range  in  price.  As  a  whole, 
cereal  breakfast  foods  are  nutritious  and  reasonably  economical.  As 
regards  digestibility  the}-  closely  resemble  bread  made  from  the  coarser 
flours  and  are  somewhat  less  thoroughly  assimilated  than  bread  made 
from  white  flour.  It  has  also  been  shown  that  flour  products  other 
than  bread  closely  resemble  bread  in  digestibility  and  total  nutritive 
value. 

From  studies  with  corn  products,  undertaken  at  the  Maine  Experi- 
ment Station,  it  appears  that  corn  bread  of  different  sorts  has  about  the 
same  digestibility  as  bread  made  from  coarse  wheat  flour,  and  that  it 
is  well  worthy  of  a  place  in  the  diet  as  a  reasonably  inexpensive  source 
of  nutritive  material,  as  well  as  for  the  sake  of  variety. 

The  studies  of  different  methods  of  cooking  meat  carried  on  at  the 
University  of  Illinois  have  shown  that  it  is  possible  to  control  cooking- 
processes  so  that  a  fairly  uniform  product  may  be  obtained  when  simi- 
lar  cuts  of  meat  are  cooked  by  either  boiling  or  roasting.  As  a  whole, 
meats  of  different  kinds  and  cuts  supply  nutritive  material,  particu- 
lar^' protein  and  fat,  in  forms  which  are  very  well  assimilated. 

Investigations  on  the  digestibility  and  nutritive  value  of  cheese 
carried  on  at  Middletown,  Conn.,  have  shown  that  cheese  (American 
cheddar)  is  very  thoroughly  assimilated  and  is  not  productive  of  diges- 
tive disturbances  as  commonl}-  supposed.  When  desired  it  may  be 
used  in  comparatively  large  quantities  as  an  inexpensive  source  of 
protein  and  energy  in  the  diet.  Cheese,  being  rich  in  protein  and  fat, 
should  be  combined  with  cereal  foods,  fruits,  and  similar  products, 
which  supply  an  abundance  of  carbohydrates,  and  when  eaten  in  con- 
siderable quantities  should  replace  rather  than  supplement  such 
nitrogenous  foods  as  meat,  eggs,  and  dried  legumes.  The  experiments 
furnish  the  first  extensive  demonstration  by  scientific  methods  of  the 
high  nutritive  value  of   this  important   dairy  product.     The  great 


REPORT  OF  THE  SECRETARY.  109 

importance  of  cheese  as  a  source  of  protein  has  not  been  hitherto  ap- 
preciated and  in  a  sense  its  commercial  value  as  a  food  has  lacked 
satisfactory  basis. 

The  investigations  carried  on  with  the  respiration  calorimeter  at 
Middletown,  Conn.,  have  furnished  new  and  valuable  factors  regard- 
ing- the  average  amount  of  energy  in  the  form  of  food  required  by  men 
at  rest  and  performing  various  kinds  of  work,  the  carbon  dioxid  and 
energy  output  at  different  times  of  the  day  under  different  conditions 
of  work  and  rest,  and  related  topics. 

The  investigations  undertaken  at  the  Hawaii  Agricultural  Experi- 
ment Station  have  furnished  interesting  data  regarding  the  nutritive 
value  of  tropical  food  products  and  the  kinds  and  amounts  of  food 
consumed  by  persons  living  under  different  circumstances  in  tropical 
regions. 

At  Columbia  University,  New  York,  the  investigations  which  have 
been  undertaken  furnish  new  and  valuable  data  regarding  the  demands 
of  the  body  for  the  ash  constituents  of  food. 

The  results  of  the  nutrition  investigations  are  made  public  by  means 
of  technical  bulletins  and  popular  summaries,  and  a  great  deal  of  mis- 
cellaneous information  is  also  supplied  to  teachers,  students,  and  other 
persons  by  means  of  correspondence,  the  increasing  demand  for  pub- 
lications and  other  data  being  an  indication  of  the  favorable  way  in 
which  the  work  is  regarded  by  the  people  at  large. 

Extended  use  has  been  made  of  the  nutrition  publications  as  text- 
books in  a  large  number  of  schools,  colleges,  and  medical  schools 
throughout  the  country,  owing  to  the  fact  that  satisfactoiy  text-books 
on  these  subjects  have  not  hitherto  been  available.  In  this  connection 
it  nia}T  be  mentioned  that  there  are  45  agricultural  colleges  or  similar 
institutions  receiving  Government  aid  for  white  students,  and  an  equal 
number  for  colored  people,  where  some  of  the  courses  of  instruction 
necessitate  the  use  of  such  data. 

The  proper  economical  feeding  of  families  or  groups — that  is,  the 
best  methods  of  utilizing  the  food  products  which  come  from  the 
farm — is  a  subject  the  importance  of  which  can  hardly  be  overesti- 
mated, and  a  knowledge  of  the  important  facts  regarding  the  nutri- 
tive value  of  different  foods  can  not  fail  to  bring  about  improved 
standards  of  living  on  farms  and  elsewhere  and  benefit  alike  the  pro- 
ducer, the  distributer,  and  the  consumer  of  food  products. 

IRRIGATION    AND    DRAINAGE    INVESTIGATIONS. 

Three  years  ago  the  Office  of  Experiment  Stations  detailed  some  of 
its  irrigation  experts  to  work  out  and  introduce  the  right  methods  of 
irrigation  in  some  of  the  older  districts  where  water  is  scarce  and 
costly  and  where  skill  and  economy  in  its  use  are  of  the  utmost  impor- 
tance, and  also  took  up  giving  practical  advice  to  beginners  in  irriga- 
tion in  sections  where  irrigation  was  being  introduced.    The  conditions 


110  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

under  which  these  men  worked  therefore  were  widely  different,  but 
the  results  have  been  the  same  in  each  case.  Wherever  this  educa- 
tional work  was  begun  there  has  been  a  marked  appreciation  of  it-; 
value.     Each  one  of  these  men  hi  fixture  in  the  State  and 

ion  where  he  was  first  located.  Every  attempt  to  send  him  to  a 
different  section  to  take  up  this  work  has  been  met  by  protests  and 
remonstrances  which  could  not  be  disregarded.  The  result  has  been 
that  request-  for  similar  work  in  other  localities  made  by  Membei 

-.  governors,  and  communities  could  not  be  responded  t". 
although  the  value  of  the  work  and  the  reasonableness  of  the  requ<  -  - 
were  fully  appreciated.  To  meet  these  demands  the  number  of  men 
engaged  in  this  work  should  be  increased  during  the  coming  year. 

Thus  far  this  work  has  been  carried  on  entirely  in  aid  of  settlers 
under  private  works,  but  it  is  believed  that  the  time  has  come  when 
this  Department  should  take  up  the  work  of  educating  and  aiding  set- 
tlers under  Government  reclamation  projects,  and  that  experts  should 

.•■tailed  to  these  projects  to  show  the  methods  of  applying  water 
which  should  be  adopted,  the  kind  of  tools  to  be  used,  the  time  when 
land  should  be  irrigated,  the  quantity  of  water  which  should  be  used, 
and  the  cultivation  which  should  follow  this  i  g 

The  experience  of  the  past  few  years  has  also  shown  that  this  edu- 
cational work  and  the  successful  conduct  of  original  investigations  can 
both  be  best  carried  on  through  the  establishment  of  farms  where  the 
best  methods  can  be  worked  out  and  illustrated  and  their  results  dem- 

rated.  While  bulletins  and  report-  are  of  great  value,  they  are 
not  equal  to  an  object  lesson.  Nothing  will  teach  these  farmers  how 
they  should  do  their  work  so  quickly  as  to  be  able  to  see  iields  pre- 
pared in  the  right  way.  water  handled  in  the  right  way.  and  the 
cultivated  in  the  right  manner.  I  believe  therefore  that  on  each 
reclamation  area  a  demonstration  farm  should  be  established,  on  which 
the  methods  of  irrigation  can  be  taught  by  a  practical  expert  from 
this  Department,  and  trust  that  provision  will  be  made  for  this  by 
the  next  Congress. 

ive  irrigation  extension  stations  for  the  demonstration  of  methods 
of  u^ing  groundwater  and  flood  and  storm  waters  in  irrigation  as  sup- 
plementary to  dry  farming  have  been  located  in  the  semiarid  belt  dur- 
ing the  past  year.  At  these  stations  it  is  expected  to  work  out  and 
demonstrate  the  methods  and  practices  for  utilizing  limited  water  sup- 
plies in  the  irrigation  of  from  1  to  10  acres  of  land,  and  the  meth- 

of  irrigation  and  tillage  needed  to  conserve  this  moisture  in  the 
soil,  and  the  benefits  which  will  come  by  making  such  irrigation  a  fea- 
ture of  i  'liarid  farm.  This  work  has  assumed  a  new  impor- 
tance because  of  the  great  wave  of  settlement  which  is  now  sweeping 
over  this  region. 


F.EFORI    OF    THE    SECBETAET.  Ill 

A  number  of  influences,  some  of  them  proper  and  some  questiona- 
ble, are  aiding  in  this  settlement.  Among  those  that  are  legitimate 
are  the  greater  possibilities  due  to  the  introduction  of  drought-resist- 
ant crop-,  the  improved  methods  of  tillage,  and  the  series  of  wet 
years  with  which  that  section  has  been  favored.  But  there  will  come 
other  dry  years,  and  the  permanent  prosperity  of  these  settlers  will 
largely  depend  upon  their  having  fortified  themselve-  _  :  the  risk 
of  drought  by  utilizing  every  opportunity  for  a  water  supply  that  the 
region  affords.  Nothing  will  aid  more  to  enhance  their  comfort  >:>r 
relieve  them  from  the  danger  of  dry  years  than  to  have  from  1  to  1") 
acres  of  land  irrigated  where  crops  can  be  grown  regardless  of  the 
rainfall.  Provision  for  such  irrigation  will  enable  the  farmer  to  grow 
trees  for  fruit  and  shade,  have  a  limited  area  of  high-priced  prodi 
enough  vegetables  for  his  family,  and  forage  for  his  cows  and  hoi 
It  will  also  enable  him  to  make  the  surroundings  of  his  homestead 
attractive,  thus  adding  to  the  comfort  and  contentment  of  country 
life  in  these  regions. 

That  the  demonstration  farm  is  an  effective  influence  in  promoting 
the  extension  of  this  kind  of  irrigation  has  been  proven  by  the  results 
of  the  oldest  of  these  stations,  located  at  Cheyenne.  Wyo.  This 
tion.  through  the  utilization  of  underground  waters  lifted  by  windmills, 
has  produced  crops  equaling  those  of  the  old  irrigated  district-.  It 
ha<  shown  the  extent  and  value  of  water  resources  hitherto  neglected. 
The  station  was  visited  during  the  year  by  fully  5,000  people,  and  its 
methods  and  results  observed  and  described  in  a  large  number  of  sci- 
entific newspapers  and  magazines,  as  well  as  in  the  local  press  of  that 
region.  It  has  encouraged  a  large  number  of  farmers  to  conserve  and 
utilize  water  supplies  which  were  hitherto  going  to  waste,  and  the 
year's  results  are  considered  as  marking  the  beginning  of  a  new  e. 
agriculture  in  that  section. 

In  many  parts  of  the  arid  and  semiarid  region  water  for  irrigation 
can  be  secured  only  by  pumping.  The  Department  has  a  constant 
call  for  information  as  to  the  cost  of  such  irrigation  and  the  types  of 
pumps  and  the  kind  of  power  which  should  be  used.  We  have  col- 
lected a  large  amount  of  information  on  these  subjects,  which  is  now 
being  prepared  for  publication,  and  recently  have  inaugurated  some 
comprehensive  tests  to  determine  the  value  of  alcohol  as  a  power  agent 
in  pumping  water  for  irrigation  and  drainage,  and  in  other  agricul- 
tural work,  with  a  view  to  giving  practical  information  to  farmers 
about  the  value  of  denatured  alcohol  as  compared  to  gasoline,  and 
the  conditions  under  which  it  should  be  used  to  secure  the  maximum 
efficiency. 

Every   year    the    area    of   irrigated   land    that    needs   drainag 
increased,  which  proves  that  irrigation  and  drainage  must  go  hand  in 
hand.     During  the  past  year  the  Department  has  been  carrying  on 


112  YEARBOOK    OF   THE   DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

extended  drainage  investigations  of  some  of  the  irrigated  districts 
injured  by  surplus  water  in  Utah,  Washington.  Nebraska,  and  Cali- 
fornia, this  work  been  paid  for  in  part  by  State  appropriations.  These 
investigations  have  been  carried  on  as  a  preliminary  step  in  the  prep- 
aration of  drainage  plans. 

The  past  year  has  also  demonstrated  the  benetits  of  good  engineering 
in  securing  the  efficiency  of  drainage  as  a  remedy  for  alkali.  The 
drains  put  in  by  .the  farmers  of  Utah  on  lands  which  were  regarded 
as  ruined  by  alkali  have  so  relieved  the  lands  in  a  single  year  that 
they  are  now  ready  for  cultivation,  and  land  drained  three  years  ago 
according  to  plans  prepared  by  the  engineers  of  this  Department,  this 
year  produced  -875  worth  of  sugar  beets  to  the  acre.  Equally  encour- 
aging results  on  a  larger  scale  have  followed  the  carrying  out  of  the 
plans  of  the  Department's  engineers  in  the  State  of  Washington. 

The  drainage  of  the  swamp  overflowed  lands  in  the  humid  parts  of 
the  United  States  would  extend  or  greatly  improve  agriculture  over 
an  area  almost  equal  to  that  of  the  States  of  Illinois,  Indiana,  and  Ohio. 
This  makes  farm  drainage  a  matter  of  National  interest  and  importance. 
Nor  will  the  increase  in  agriculture  mark  the  full  measure  of  the  bene- 
fits of  this  drainage.  Many  of  these  swamps  are  a  menace  to  the 
health  of  surrounding  neighborhoods  and  a  great  obstacle  to  the  devel- 
opment of  commerce  and  manufacturing.  The  reclamation  of  some  of 
these  areas,  like  the  coastal  swamps  of  the  Carolinas.  the  Everglades 
of  Florida,  and  the  St.  Francis  Basin  iu  Arkansas,  presents  agricul- 
tural and  engineering  problems  of  great  complexity,  which  can  not 
be  solved  by  private  enterprise;  the  cost  and  the  area  of  country 
involved  are  both  too  great.  As  a  rule  agricultural  drainage  requires 
special  legislation  to  provide  for  the  organization  of  the  district  to  be 
benerited  and  the  raising  and  expenditure  of  funds  under  public  or 
semipublic  authority.  The  general  interest  manifested  in  drainage 
in  this  country,  with  the  large  amount  of  work  done  at  present,  has 
given  rise  to  many  important  questions,  legislative,  financial,  engineer- 
ing, and  agricultural.  The  calls  on  the  Department  along  these  lines 
have  been  far  greater  than  could  be  met.  During  the  past  year  it  has 
rendered  important  aid  by  conferences  with  State  officials  and  others 
in  making  surveys  and  investigations  to  determine  the  feasibility  of 
large  drainage  projects  and  prepare  plans  for  the  work.  During  the 
year  this  Department  has  carried  on  these  surveys  and  investigations 
in  thirty-one  of  the  forty-six  States. 

OFFICE  OF  PUBLIC  ROADS. 

Throughout  the  country,  and  more  particularly  in  the  rural  districts, 
there  is  a  steadily  growing  demand  for  information  as  to  the  best 
methods  of  road  construction.     Considering  the  country  as  a  whole, 


REPORT  OF  THE  SECRETARY.  113 

it  is  probably  true  that  in  no  phase  of  development  are  we  so  back- 
ward as  in  the  extension  of  hard  and  durable  roads.  In  the  cases  in 
which  the  people  are  willing  to  expend  money  on  the  improvement  of 
their  highways,  it  frequently  happens  that,  owing  to  inexperience 
and  lack  of  organization,  the  money  is  partially  or  totally  wasted.  In 
some  communities  abundantly  able  to  support  a  system  of  good  roads, 
very  little  work  is  done,  owing  to  a  lack  of  knowledge  of  what  can  be 
accomplished  with  the  resources  at  hand.  It  is  precisely  in  cases  like 
these  that  the  work  of  the  Office  of  Public  Roads  is  proving  of  signal 
value.  While  it  is  no  part  of  the  scope  of  its  work  to  undertake  the 
construction  of  roads  that  can  be  and  should  be  the  care  of  communi- 
ties within  the  States,  the  educational  value  of  employing  expert 
supervision,  as  well  as.  to  a  limited  extent,  machinery  for  the  con- 
struction of  sections  of  improved  roads  in  different  parts  of  the  coun- 
try, has  been  amply  demonstrated. 

The  act  of  Congress  making  appropriation  for  the  Office  of  Public 
Roads  makes  three  distinct  requirements  in  relation  to  the  work  to  be 
performed,  viz,  to  investigate  systems  of  road  administration  through- 
out the  United  States,  to  give  expert  advice  on  road  construction,  and 
to  investigate  the  chemical  and  physical  properties  of  road  material-. 
During  the  past  year  the  work  of  the  Office  lias  been  arranged  in  three 
general  divisions  along  the  lines  indicated. 

The  Office  is  also  collecting  information  as  to  comparative  cost  of 
road  work,  methods  of  building  various  types  of  roads.  State-aid 
roads,  legislation  regarding  road  management,  the  value  of  wide  tires. 
the  use  of  convict  labor  in  road  building,  cost  of  wagon  transportation, 
and  bond  issues  for  road  improvement.  Numerous  inquiries  are 
received  asking  for  information  on  the  subject  of  the  road  laws  of  the 
various  States,  and  a  complete  digest  of  the  road  laws  of  all  the  States 
is  being  prepared  for  publication. 

EXPERT    ADVICE    OX    ROAD    COXSTRTXTIOX. 

Expert  advice  on  road  construction  has  boon  given  and  experi- 
mental field  work  carried  on  by  the  Office.  There  were  employed  on 
this  work  at  the  close  of  the  fiscal  year,  in  addition  to  the  chief 
engineer.  3  engineers.  1  consulting  engineer.  (3  engineer  students. 
(3  road  experts,  and  5  expert  roller  operators.  Whenever  it  is  pos- 
sible and  where  application  has  been  made  in  the  proper  Avay,  object- 
lesson  roads  are  constructed  for  the  purpose  of  illustrating  the  best 
methods  of  road  building.  The  local  authorities  furnish  all  material, 
common  labor,  teams,  and  fuel,  the  Office  supplying  supervising  engi- 
neers and  in  some  cases  part  or  all  of  the  necessary  machinery.  In 
addition  to  this,  tests  are  made  to  determine  the  best  material 
3   a  1906 8 


114  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGEICULTV 

available  for  the  road.     It  freqa  ippeas   that  these  short  - 

-  of  object-lesson  roads  have  subsequently  led  to  the  construction 
of  fin  the  localities  in  which  they  were 

built.     Daring  the  p  I  year  17  roads  ;ilt  in  11  Sta; 

resenting"  a  wide  diversity  in  character  of  construction  and  kin.; 
material  used. 

In  many  cases  in  which  rued  ad  the 

miction  of  an  obje  .  road,  engineers  and  experts  of  the 

Office  are  able  I  i  give  advice  that  enables  local  authorities  to  improve 
the  conditions  and   surmount   difficulties.     It   is  evident   that   wl 
only  small  amount-  of  money  are  available  for  road  improvement  it  is 
frequent.  r  to  improve  the  highways  already  existing  than  to 

apt  the  construction  of  macadam  roads.     Special  attention   has 
been  given  to  this  >rk  and  the  Office  has  been  able  to  do 

much  in  developing-  t  -  sand  clay  and  burnt  clay  for  roads  in 

large   areas   of  cour.  specially  in  the  South,  where  no  stone  is 

available. 

In  order  to  give  expert  advice  on  special  problems  which  are  con- 
tinually arising  in  road  construction  and  maintenance,  it 
to  carrr  on  experimental  work.     Daring  the   past  year  method 
rend  ring  -  ted     Hie  growing  as 

motor  vehicles  L  »d  difficult  problem  to  engineers 

and  road  builder-.      3  xperiments  were  carried  on  at  Jack- 

son, Tens.,  daring         spring  and  with 

the  citv  engineer,  to  determine  the  value  of  coal  tar  for  preventing  dust 
and  preserving  th' surface  of  macadam  road-.  iade 

with  Texas  oil  and  its  residuums  on  earth  and  macadam  roads.     The 
-    entailed  in  these  experiment-  was  nnalL     The  quantity  of  tar 
applied  per  square  yard  average-.  _   lion  and  the  cost  of  labor  for 

applying  this  quant:  -   : nan  1  cent  per  square  yard. 

..     -.  including  the  winter  season  of  1906-6, 
the  tarred  roads  are  .still  in  excellent  condition. 

Additional  experim  re  conducted  during  the  summer  of   1 

on  the  Potomac  River  driv.    in   W  :>.  D.  C.  ration 

the  .Superintendent  of  Buildings  and  Grounds.     Crude  coal  tar 
similar  to  that  used  at  Jackson.  Tenn..  was  r.  Fork.     These 

have  been  completed  ttime.     The  great  demand 

:  the  country  for  -  >rt  of  treatment  of  road 

surfaces  to  .suppress  the  growing  du-t  nuisance  has  developed  a  num- 
ber of  materials  which  i  imed  will  the  purpose.     Many 
hese  nia                    i  h  are  mainly  emulsions  of  oil  and  tar  with 
fcer,  have  been  given  trade  names  and  patented.     Il  e  hoped 
careful  experiment  will  show  that  some  material  like  crude  coal 
tar.  wb:  b             ••  obtained  and  easily  applied  wherever  ther. 
plant,  will  prove  to  be  efficient  if  properly  used.     It  may  be  said  that 


REPORT  OF  THE  SECRETARY.  115 

a  large  number  of  trials  of  crude  tar  in  France  and  a  few  in  this  coun- 
try, notably  the  one  at  Jackson,  Tenn.,  have  given  excellent  results. 
In  other  cases  partial  or  entire  failure  has  followed  the  experiments, 
and  it  yet  remains  to  be  determined  whether  the  successful  use  of 
materials  of  this  nature  can  be  developed.  The  Office  will  make 
unremitting  eli'orts  to  solve  this  problem  by  such  experiments  as  can 
be  carried  on  in  different  parts  of  the  country  in  cooperation  with 
local  authorities. 

In  order  to  recruit  th<  ranks  of  engineers  that  arc  necessary  to  the 
success  of  the  work  of  the  Office,  the  plan  was  adopted  of  appointing 
graduates  from  civil  engineering  schools  to  the  positions  of  civil  engi- 
neer students,  as  fully  explained  in  the  annual  report  of  the  Office  of 
Public  Roads  for  1005.  Up  to  June  30,  1006,  nine  students  had  been 
appointed,  at  $600  per  annum.  Of  this  number  three  have  been  given 
permanent  appointments  at  increased  salaries.  The  other  six  have  not 
yet  completed  the  one-year  course. 

A  number  of  schools  and  colleges  have  within  recent  years  estab- 
lished summer  schools  in  road  building. 

INVESTIGATION    OF    THE    PROPERTIES   OF   ROAD    MATERIALS. 

During  the  past  year  381  samples  were  received  at  the  laboratory 
for  routine  tests,  of  which  number  273  were  samples  of  rock,  intended 
for  macadam  road  building.  Of  the  273  samples,  about  12  per 
cent  were  limestone,  11  per  cent  dolomite,  10  per  cent  trap.  S  per 
cent  sandstone,  and  8  per  cent  granite.  The  remaining  samples  were 
of  a  miscellaneous  character,  including  brick,  cements,  and  sand. 
Some  of  this  testing  work  is  done  in  cooperation  with  various  Depart- 
ments of  the  Government.  A  comparison  of  the  demand  for  tests 
with  the  records  of  previous  years  shows  that  it  has  increased  about 
33  per  cent. 

A  significant  fact,  in  connection  with  the  laboratory  work,  is  that  a 
very  large  number  of  samples  have  come  from  the  Eastern  and  Mid- 
dle States,  which  have  not  received  much  assistance  in  the  form  of 
object-lesson  roads.  This  tends  to  distribute  uniformly  the  benefit 
arising  from  the  work  of  the  Office. 

There  is  a  growing  amount  of  cooperation  between  the  various  State 
geologists  and  the  Office  in  the  preparation  of  data  showing  the 
character  of  material  suitable  for  road  work  in  the  different  States. 
From  one  State  alone  more  than  80  samples  have  been  tested.  The 
information  thus  secured  has  been  used  in  a  bulletin,  recently  prepared 
and  published  by  the  geologist  in  charge,  on  the  road-building 
resources  of  this  State.  Chemical  and  physical  examinations  have 
included  practically  all  materials  which  directly  or  indirectly  come 
into  use  in  road  construction. 


116  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

The  studies  of  decomposition  of  various  kinds  of  rock  dusts  under 
the  action  of  water,  which  were  undertaken  in  order  to  determine 
the  reasons  for  the  important  quality  of  binding  power  in  macadam- 
road  materials,  have  brought  to  light  some  specially  interesting  facts. 
For  instance,  it  has  been  found  that  by  mixing  certain  rocks  of 
inferior  binding  power  on  the  surface  of  the  road  a  much  higher  bind- 
ing power  results,  as  in  the  case  of  limestone  and  granite.  As  the 
binding  or  cementing  power  of  rocks  is  one  of  the  chief  factors  in  the 
life  of  a  road,  the  value  of  this  discovery  is  of  obvious  importance. 
These  results,  originally  obtained  in  the  laboratory,  have  been  con- 
firmed by  observation  and  experiment  on  roads.  In  the  course  of  this 
investigation  it  was  found  that  the  decomposing  action  of  water  on 
certain  t}rpes  of  ground  rocks  went  much  further  than  had  been  pre- 
viously believed  to  be  the  case.  This  applies  to  the  alkalies,  and 
especially  the  potash,  contained  in  many  rocks.  The  results  have  sug- 
gested the  possible  use  of  ground  rock  as  a  potash  fertilizer.  Work 
along  this  line  has  now  been  turned  over  to  another  Bureau  of  the 
Department,  where  it  can  be  appropriately  followed  up  and  carefully 
investigated. 

Owing  to  the  numerous  complaints  of  farmers  in  regard  to  the  rapid 
deterioration  of  the  modern  fence  wire  in  comparison  with  that  manii-' 
factured  in  former  years,  an  investigation  of  the  subject  was  begun  to 
see  what  could  be  done  to  remedy  the  defect.  Farmers'  Bulletin  239 
contains  a  report  of  this  investigation,  which  has  aroused  the  interest 
of  manufacturers  and  has  determined  some  of  them  to  take  active 
steps  toward  producing  a  fence  wire  more  resistant  to  atmospheric 
corrosion. 

The  scarcity  of  timber  in  many  sections  of  the  country,  not  only  for 
construction  work,  but  for  fence  posts,  has  in  recent  years  led  to  a 
more  general  use  of  concrete.  This  material  is  admirably  adapted  for 
farm  purposes,  but  there  seems  to  be  a  general  lack  of  knowledge  con- 
cerning its  preparation  and  use.  After  a  series  of  tests  and  investi- 
gations, Farmers'  Bulletin  235  was  issued,  giving  full  information 
concerning  cement,  cement  mortar,  the  mixing  of  concretes,  and  the 
construction  of  concrete  sidewalks,  driveways,  fence  posts,  etc.  A 
number  of  persons  throughout  the  country  who  claim  to  have  obtained 
special  patents  on  concrete  fence  posts  have  attempted  to  prevent 
fanners  from  constructing  their  own  posts  by  threats  of  prosecution 
for  infringement.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  concrete  construction  of 
all  kinds  reenforced  with  plain,  straight,  metal  strips,  bars,  and  tubes 
has  been  in  general  use  in  all  countries  for  many  years,  the  claims  ol 
such  persons  are  usually  without  warrant.  The  Office  has  been  enabled 
to  be  of  great  service  to  farmers  by  making  it  clear  to  them  that,  unless 
special  forms  and  devices  of  reenforccment  were  employed  which  were 


REPOKT  OF  THE  SECRETARY.  117 

distinctly  patentable,  no  rights  were  infringed  l>3r  the  use  of  concrete 
with  plain  metal  reenforcement. 

Before  being-  assigned  to  work  in  the  field  the  engineer  students 
employed  in  the  Office  receive  a  course  of  instruction  in  the  testing 
laboratory.  This  work  consists  in  actually  making  the  various  tests 
of  road  materials  and  computing  results.  The  information  thus 
obtained  is  considered  necessary  in  connection  with  the  selection  of 
the  best  materials  for  road  construction  before  a  thorough  understand- 
ing of  the  relations  which  exist  between  laboratory  tests  and  the 
behavior  of  these  materials  under  traffic  can  be  gained. 

A  number  of  new  projects  and  lines  of  investigation  have  been 
mapped  out  for  the  immediate  future. 

Outside  of  the  laboratory  a  study  of  road  machinery  will  be  under- 
taken to  determine  the  suitability  of  various  t\Tpes  for  different  kinds 
of  road  work. 

Cooperation  will  be  sought  with  the  Geological  Survey  for  the  pur- 
pose of  indicating  the  various  classes  of  roads  on  topographic  maps 
issued  b}T  the  Survey.  Cooperation  has  been  begun  with  the  Forest 
Service  in  laying  out  and  constructing  wagon  roads  and  trails  in  forest 
reserves  to  facilitate  lumbering.  As  a  beginning  one  engineer  has  been 
detailed  to  this  work  and  has  been  some  months  in  the  Yellowstone 
Reserve.  The  tield  report  indicates  that  much  good  will  follow  the  pre- 
liminary survey  which  has  been  made. 

Cooperation  with  the  Post-Office  Department  has  been  begun  in 
order  to  facilitate  rural  delivery  b}r  the  improvement  of  country  roads. 
This  work  is  of  vital  importance.  The  plan,  which  carries  the  approval 
of  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture  and  the  Postmaster-General,  provides 
that  whenever  a  road  upon  which  a  rural  route  has  been  or  is  about 
to  be  established  is  reported  by  the  carrier  or  inspector  to  be  impassable 
or  in  bad  repair,  the  Fourth  Assistant  Postmaster-General  will  advise 
the  Director  of  the  Office  of  Public  Roads  of  the  fact  and  request  that 
he  have  an  engineer  inspector  detailed  to  examine  the  road  and  give 
such  advice  and  instruction  to  the  local  officials  as  may  be  required. 

Upon  receipt  of  such  information  from  the  Fourth  Assistant  Post- 
master-General, the  Director  of  the  Office  of  Public  Roads  will  com- 
municate with  the  local  officials  and  supply  them  with  a  copy  of  the 
circular  of  instructions  and  a  blank  form  for  making  application  for 
the  detail  of  such  engineer  inspector.  It  is  not  the  purpose  of  the 
Office  of  Public  Roads  to  actually  construct  the  road  or  to  make  any 
contribution  in  money,  materials,  or  labor.  In  most  cases  a  road  is 
impassable  on  account  of  defects  which  can  be  remedied  by  the  use  of 
proper  methods.  The  engineer  inspector  who  examines  the  road  will 
note  carefully  all  such  defects  and  advise  as  to  what  steps  can  be  taken 
to  place  the  road  in  proper  condition  without  great  expense.     If  prac- 


118  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

tic-able,  and   if  so  desired,  he  may  in  some  cases  assume  temporary 
direction  of  the  work  for  the  purpose  of  instruction. 

A  -  the  chief  aim  and  purpose  of  the  Office  of  Public  Roads  is  to  bring 
about  a  general  and  uniform  improvement  of  the  country  roads  through- 
oat  the  United  States,  a  cooperative  plan  such  as  the  one  described 
above  offers  the  best  possible  means  of  achieving  positive  result-  in 
furtherance  of  that  purpose.  By  this  means  correct  methods  of  road 
building  and  road  maintenance  will  be  introduced  into  practically  every 
section  of  the  country.  The  engineer  inspectors  assigned  to  thi>  work 
will,  in  visiting  places  which  have  requested  assistance  of  this  charac- 
ter, follow  an  itinerary  which  will  include  a  number  of  places  in  a 
d  territory.  This  will  greatly  minimize  the  expense  of  each 
inspection  and  permit  the  inspector  to  cover  a  much  larger  territory 
than  would  be  possible  in  a  special  assignment  to  each  place.  A  begin- 
ning has  been  made  during  the  current  fiscal  year,  and  efforts  will  be 
made  to  increase  the  scope  of  the  work  in  the  future. 

EXPENDITURES  ANT)  EMPLOYEES. 

Congre<>  appropriated  $7,175,690  for  the  maintenance  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture  for  the  year  ended  June  30,  1906.  This  was 
$1,081,150  more  than  the  appropriation  for  the  preceding  year.  In 
addition  the  Department  received  from  various  sources,  chiefly  sales 
of  product-.  Si;,. 4~oAo.  At  the  close  of  the  vear  there  was  >till 
unexpended,  of  the  appropriation.  $1,175,362.15,  nearly  all  of  which 
will  be  required  to  meet  outstanding  obligations.  The  unexpended 
balance  for  the  year  1904  ($55,712.37)  was.  on  June  30,  1906,  covered 
into  the  Treasury.  The  account  for  1906  was  still  open.  Of  the 
special  appropriations  aggregating  $1,250,000  for  new  building-. 
-     _       r.25  had  >>een  expended  prior  to  September  1".  1906. 

For  the  current  year  (ending  June  30,  1907)  Congress  appropriated 
I  LO, 44"  for  the  regular  work  of  the  Department.  The  increase  i- 
chiefly  due  to  the  broadening  of  the  meat  inspection.  For  that  service 
the  permanent  appropriation  is  $3,000,000.  The  estimated  revenues 
"  .  ••«>  from  sales  of  products  of  the  forest  reserves  and  $780,934. 68 
available  for  the  new  buildings  bring  the  total  amount  to  be  disbursed 
by  this  Department  during  the  current  year  up  to  $10,691,374.68. 

The  number  of  persons  on  the  rolls  of  the  Department  of  Agricul- 
ture on  July  1.  1906,  was,  outside  of  "Washington.  4,648;  in  Washing- 
ton. 1,594;  total.  6,242,  showing  an  increase  during  the  year  of  796. 
Of  the  total  number,  more  than  l.<s<X)  have  been  on  the  rolls  for  six 
year-  or  longer.  In  the  classified  service  i'17  were  promoted  in  salary 
and  clas-.  and  403  resigned.  The  total  number  of  deaths  during  the 
vear  was  28. 


REPORT    OF    THE    SECRETARY.  119 

NEW  BUILDING  FOR  THE  DEPARTMENT. 

The  act  approved  February  9,  1903,  authorizing  an  appropriation  of 
$1,500,000  for  a  new  building,  made  possible  the  beginning  of  the 
construction  of  suitable  quarters  for  the  accommodation  of  the  Depart- 
ment'.'- work. 

It  was  very  necessary  in  the  new  building-  operations  to  make 
arrangements  for  future  requirements,  and  with  this  in  mind,  together 
with  the  imperative  need  for  suitable  laboratories  to  carry  on  the 
important  investigations  of  the  various  Bureaus,  it  was  concluded  to 
erect  two  segments  of  a  building,  so  arranged  that  extensions  could  be 
provided  as  required,  these  segments  to  be  used  primarily  for  labora- 
tory work  and  to  provide  fireproof  accommodations  for  the  Library. 
Contracts  have  been  awarded  for  structures  of  suitable  type  and 
design  to  correspond  with  other  Government  buildings  in  the  city,  the 
ba>e  being  constructed  of  granite  and  the  superstructure  of  white 
marble. 

The  work  has  now  progressed,  with  the  exception  of  the  interior 
finish,  to  approximately  the  fourth-floor  line,  and  it  is  probable  that 
the  roof  will  be  on  before  the  winter  season.  The  rooting  and  closing 
in  will  allow  the  interior  work  to  be  carried  on  during  the  winter 
without  interruption,  which,  without  unforeseen  complications,  will 
insure  the  completion  of  operations  within  the  contract  time,  namely. 
November  11,  1907,  and  within  the  8l.5n0.O00  authorized  by  Con- 
gress. The  mechanical  equipment  work,  including  the  heating  and 
ventilating  apparatus,  the  electric  wiring  and  conduit  systems,  and 
the  electric  elevators,  has  been  started,  and  these  systems  will  be 
read}*  for  use  at  the  time  of  the  completion  of  the  buildings. 

The  estimated  growth  of  the  Department,  made  at  the  time  the 
appropriation  for  the  new  building  was  approved,  has  been  greatly 
exceeded.  Statistics  show  that  there  has  been  during  this  period  of 
approximately  three  and  one-half  years,  exclusive  of  the  Weather 
Bureau,  an  increase  in  the  number  of  emplovees  of  from  1,037  to  1,183 
in  Washington,  D.  C  making  a  percentage  increase  of  13.  Further, 
the  space  required  by  this  force  of  employees  has  increased  from  137,963 
square  feet  to  approximately  261,000,  this  being  a  00  per  cent 
increase,  and  the  rentals  paid  from  the  Department  appropriation 
have  increased  from  $21,700  to  $51,108.00.  or  over  150  per  cent. 

This  rapid  increase  will  require  other  segments  of  the  proposed 
buildings  to  be  constructed  before  the  Department  will  have  sufficient 
and  suitable  accommodations  for  its  work  and  before  the  large  amount 
paid  annually  for  rentals  can  be  substantially  decreased. 

To  carry  on  the  work  of  the  Department  in  an  efficient  manner  on 
the  lines  laid  down  in  the  foregoing  report  has  necessitated  provision 
for  somewhat  increased  appropriations.     This  report  will  fall  short 


120  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

of  its  purpose  if  it  has  not  made  clear  the  importance  of  the  interests 
the  Department  is  designed  to  serve,  and  the  necessity  for  carrying 
on  its  work.  Moreover,  the  duties  devolving  upon  it  are  imposed 
upon  it  by  law.  and  it  is  with  full  appreciation  of  these  several  con- 
siderations that  estimates  for  its  expenses  must  be  viewed.  The  esti- 
mates for  the  ensuing  year  have  been  most  conservatively  prepared, 
based  upon  the  lines  of  work  imposed  upon  the  Department  by  the 
Congress,  and  I  earnestly  commend  them  to  the  favorable  considera- 
tion of  that  body. 

Kespectfully  submitted. 

James  Wilsox,   Secretary. 

Washington,  D.  C, 

November &£,  1906. 


NEW  PROBLEMS  OF  THE  WEATHER. 

By  Willis  L.  Moore,  W.  J.  Humphreys,  and  O.  L.  Fassig, 
Of  the  Weather  Bureau. 

A  knowledge  of  the  coming-  weather  enters  so  intimately  into  every 
contemplated  human  action  that  the  question  is  often  asked:  What  are 
the  prospects  for  further  improvement  in  the  accuracy  of  weather  fore- 
casts, and  can  the  seasons  ever  be  foretold  ?  The  answer  is  that,  while  the 
Government  has  a  corps  of  forecasters  who  are  now  applying  all  of  the 
knowledge  of  the  atmosphere  that  has  been  revealed,  little  hope  for 
material  improvement  in  their  work  can  be  held  out  until  a  substantial 
addition  is  made  to  the  pure  science  of  the  problem.  This  can  only 
come  through  experiment,  stud}7,  and  research.  With  200  stations 
engaged  in  applying  the  "science,  it  is  a  wise  economy  to  devote  at  least 
one  of  them  to  the  work  of  adding  to  the  knowledge  that  is  now  costing 
us  nearly  a  million  and  a  half  dollars  annually  to  apply.  Accordingly, 
those  in  charge  have  endeavored  to  lay  out  a  plan  of  study  and  research 
leading  to  an  increase  in  our  knowledge  of  the  laws  governing  the 
atmosphere  such  as  should  eventually  enable  our  successors,  if  not 
ourselves,  to  add  to  the  accuracy  of  weather  forecasts  and  to  make 
them  for  a  longer  period  in  advance. 

THK  MOUNT  WEATHER  RESEARCH  OBSERVATORY. 

In  order  that  this  country  ma3T  do  its  share  toward  the  advance- 
ment of  meteorology  along  the  lines  that  specially  relate  to  conditions 
in  America,  it  is  imperative  that  the  Weather  Bureau  should  establish 
an  observatory  for  its  own  special  research  work.  A  piece  of  land  has 
therefore  been  secured  and  work  has  been  inaugurated  at  an  estab- 
lishment that  is  intended  to  respond  to  the  present  and  prospec- 
tive needs  of  meteorology.  This  establishment  is  called  the  Mount 
Weather  Research  Observatory,  and  is  organized  on  a  broad  and 
elastic  basis,  so  that  it  may  from  year  to  year  expand  with  the  growing 
knowledge  of  our  needs.     (See  Pis.  I— III. ) 

STUDY    OF   THE    UPPER    ATMOSPHERE. 

In  order  to  prosecute  the  researches  contemplated  at  Mount  Weather, 
a  plant  has  been  established  there  especially  adapted  to  the  investiga- 
tion of  the  physical  condition  of  the  atmosphere  at  great  elevations 
above   the   surface  of   the   earth.     Hitherto   our   knowledge   of   the 

121 


122  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

conditions  of  temperature,  pressure,  humidity,  and  wind  velocity  and 
direction  has  been  based  upoo  observations  made  at  or  near  the 
surface  of  the  earth  or  upon  mountain  peaks.  Current  conceptions 
of  the  laws  of  storms  and  of  the  general  circulation  of  the  atmosphere 
are  based  upon  such  observations  almost  entirely.  Records  obtained 
in  recent  yean  by  means  of  balloons  have  demonstrated  the  existence 
of  hitherto  unsuspected  variations  and  contrasts  in  temperatui 
very  great  elevations,  and  have  shown  thai  rations  on  mountain 

tops  and  at  equal  elevations  in  the  free  air  vary  widely. 

The  necessity  for  a  better  knowledge  of  temperature  condition-  at 
great  elevations  has  directed  the  minds  of  many  mete  ists  to  the 

study  of  the  best  method-  for  lifting  self-recording  instruments  high 
above  the  earth's  surface.  The  result  has  been  the  invention  in  recent 
years  of  ingenious  forms  of  kites  and  of  specially  designed  balloons 
for  this  purpose.  The  kite  has  again  become  an  instrument  for 
scientific  research,  and  now  enables  us  to  bring  down  ro 
atmospheric  conditions  at  elevations  of  2  and  3  miles,  and  even  of  4 
miles,  as  was  recently  demonstrated  at  the  German  aeronautical 
observatory  near  Lindenberg-     By  mean  .all  rubber  balloons. 

marvelously  light  self-recording  instruments  have  been  carried  up  to 
the  remarkable  heights  of  10  to  15  miles,  bringing  back  record-  of 
low  temperatures  and  high  wind  velocities  which  have  been  a  revela- 
tion to  meteorologists — records  which  are  compelling  a  reconstruction 
of  existing  ideas  concerning  the  dynamics  of  the  atmosphere. 

Pioneer  work  along  these  lines  was  begun  some  years  ago  by  means 
of  kites,  both  at  Weather  Bureau  stations  and.  under  the  direction  of 
Mr.  A.  L.  Botch,  at  the  Blue  Hill  Observatory,  near  Bo-ton.  Mass. 
By  experiments  begun  at  St.  Louis  at  the  time  of  the  World's  Fair 
in  the  summer  of  1904,  Mr.  Botch  also  initiated  the  practice  in  this 
country  of  -ending  up  small  rubber  balhu,    5. 

The  observatory  at  Mount  Weather  is  now  well  equipped  with  the 
necessary  plant  for  carrying  on  this  new  and  promising  work  of  aerial 
Eurch,  and  has  for  nearly  a  year  been  cooperating  with  European 
institutions  and  with  the  Blue  Hill  Observatory  in  -ending  up.  on 
prearranged  day-,  kite-  or  captive  balloon-.  These  kite-  may  be 
raised  in  wind-  varying  from  10  mile-  per  hour  to  35  or  40  mile-  at 
tie-  surface.  With  winds  of  less  than  1"  miles  per  hour  it  is  necessary 
to  employ  captive  balloon-.  To  attain  great  height-  -mall  free  nil 
balloon-  of  -l  or  :)  cubic  yard-  capacity,  called  pilot  balloon-,  are 
employed.  The  instrument-  carried  by  the  kite-  and  balloons  vary 
in  weight  from  1£  to  3  or  i  pounds  and  record  variations  in  the  tem- 
perature, the  pre-sure.  the  humidity  of  the  air.  and  the  wind  velocity. 

The  balloons  are  filled  with  hydrogen  gas  in  order  to  secure  the 
greatest  lifting  power.  This  necessitates  the  use  of  special  apparatus 
for  the  manufacture  of  hydrogen.     At  the  Mount  Weather  Research 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  I. 


Buildings  and  Apparatus  at  Mount  Weather,  Va. 

p..— Power  house  and  balloon  shed.    2.— Revolving  kite  and  balloon  shed.    3.— The  Siegs- 
feld  kite  balloon.    4. — Hergesell  balloon  meteorograph  in  protecting  basket] 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  II. 


Appliances  in  Use  at  Mount  Weather,  Va. 

[1. — French  balloon  meteorograph.    2. — Marvin  kite  meteorograph  with  anemometer. 
3. — Hargrave-Marvin  box  kites.     4. — Marvin  meteorograph,  with  record.] 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture, 


Plate  III. 


Buildings  and  Instruments  at  Mount  Weather,  Va. 
[l.-Administration  building.    2.-Magnetic  observatory  buildings.    3.-Interior  of  m 
observatory-magnetometer  and  indicator.    ^.-Interior  of  magnetic  observatory-decli- 
nometer and  theodolite.] 


NEW    PROBLEMS    OF    THE    WEATHEL.  123 

Observatory  a  strong  electric  current  is  passed  through  water,  break- 
ing up  the  liquid  into  its  constituent  elements  of  hydrogen  and  oxy- 
gen. These  gases  are  then  collected  and  stored  in  appropriate  tanks 
for  future  use  as  occasion  may  require. 

.V-  the  small  pilot  balloons  carry  up  their  Instruments  to  height.-,  of 
many  miles,  where  the  prevailing  temperatures  are  at  all  times  very 
low  (sometimes  exceeding  100 :  Fahrenheit  below  zero),  it  is  neces-ary 
to  test  the  accuracy  of  the  thermographs  at  these  low  points.  For 
this  purpose  the  observatory  is  equipped  with  a  plant  for  the  manu- 
facture of  liquid  air.  by  means  of  which  the  instruments  may  Detested 
to  the  lowest  points  likely  to  be  reached  at  great  elevations. 

In  the  near  future  these  small  rubbei  pilot  balloons,  carrying  with 
them  to  elevations  of  30.000  to  50,000  feet  the  light  self-recording 
instruments  referred  to,  will  be  liberated  simultaneously  at  20  to  30 
Weather  Bureau  stations  surrounding  typical  storm  centers.  Obser- 
vation.- obtained  in  this  manner  at  various  elevations  when  com- 
pared with  the  records  made  at  the  same  time  at  the  surface  of  the 
earth  will  doubtless  throw  much  new  light  upon  the  mechanism  of 
storms,  cold  waves,  etc..  and  give  to  meteorologists  a  better  under- 
standing of  the  general  circulation  of  the  atmosphere. 

STUDY    OF    RELATIONS    BETWEEN    sL'N    AND    WEATHER. 

As  one  of  the  primary  objects  in  view  in  establishing  Mount  Weather 
Observatory  is  to  make  a  study  of  the  relations  existing  between  the 
various  forms  of  solar  radiation  and  terrestrial  weather  conditions, 
much  attention  has  been  given  to  the  instrumental  equipment  and  to 
securing  men  to  study  the  variations  in  the  amount  of  heat  energy 
given  off  by  the  sun  from  day  to  day  and  variations  in  the  amount  of 
heat  absorbed  by  the  atmosphere.  Some  work  along  these  lines  has 
already  been  done;  but  a  special  building  and  instruments  will  soon  be 
necessary  for  the  study  of  these  important  problems  of  solar  physics. 

At  present  the  most  sensitive  index  of  changes  in  solar  energy  is  the 
Suspended  magnet.  There  is  no  doubt  that  changes  in  the  intensity 
and  direction  of  the  magnetic  force  as  registered  at  the  earth's  surface 
are  coincident  with  the  appearance  and  disappearance  of  certain  well- 
recognized  periodic  phenomena  observed  on  the  face  of  the  sun.  Ic 
is  fortunate  that  we  have  in  the  magnetism  of  the  earth  a  terrestrial 
element  which  varies  in  delicate  sympathetic  relation  with  the  activi- 
ties of  the  sun  and  is  at  the  same  time  subject  to  continuous  observa- 
tion and  registration.  To  appreciate  the  value  of  terrestrial  magnetism 
as  a  faithful  index  of  the  state  of  the  sun  it  should  be  understood  that 
not  only  are  there  regular  ebbs  and  flows  of  magnetic  force  in  response 
to  the  sun's  annual  approach  and  recession,  his  axial  rotation  and  daily 
passage  through  the  heavens  but  even  the  outburst  of  a  solar  spot  is 
simultaneously  announced  by  a  disturbance  of  the  earth's  magnetism. 


124  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

So  important  to  the  study  of  the  sun  is  a  continuous  record  of  the 
magnetic  variations  that  one  of  the  first  steps  in  the  establishment  of 
the  observatory  was  the  installation  of  a  magnetic  plant  consisting  of 
the  best  modern  instruments  for  the  direct  observation  and  for  the 
continuous  registration  of  the  variations  in  the  magnetism  of  the  earth. 
The  standard  observatory  instruments,  both  for  continuous  registra- 
tion and  direct  measurement,  are  of  the  type  devised  by  Wild  for  the 
model  magnetic  observatory  at  Pavlovsk.  Russia.  These  are  supple- 
mented by  a  set  of  Eschenhagen  magnetographs,  the  extreme  sensi- 
tiveness of  which  peculiarly  fits  them  for  recording  minute  fluctua- 
tions of  the  earth's  magnetic  force. 

The  principal  application  #f  the  results  of  the  observations  will-be 
to  supplement  the  direct  observations  of  the  sun.  and  thus  to  carry  on 
the  record  of  the  solar  activity  continuously  day  and  night  in  all  con- 
ditions of  weather.  Researches  will  also  be  carried  on  to  determine 
the  existence  and  measure  the  extent  of  probable  direct  relations 
between  meteorological  disturbances  and  magnetic  variations.  The 
magnetic  records  will  also  be  specially  studied  in  conjunction  with  the 
results  of  observations  of  the  radioactivity  and  the  electrical  condition 
of  the  air.  particularly  during  thunder-storms  and  at  times  of  auro- 
ral displays,  for  the  purpose  of  revealing  their  relation  to  meteoro- 
logical conditions. 

EXPERIMENTAL   PHYSICS. 

The  physical  laboratory  is  not  yet  completed,  and  consequently  it 
has  not  been  possible  to  undertake  investigations  here  in  experimental 
physics.  However,  through  the  kindness  of  the  authorities  of  the 
University  of  Virginia  a  good  deal  of  spectroscopic  work  has  been 
done  at  that  institution.  Some  of  the  results  have  been  published  in 
the  Astrophysical  Journal,  and  there  are  many  data  yet  on  hand  to  be 
worked  up  at  the  earliest  opportunity.  An  investigation,  by  the  aid 
of  a  large  telescope,  of  the  causes  and  meteorological  relations  of  the 
scintillation  of  stars  is  in  progress  at  the  University  of  Virginia  along 
line-  suggested  by  one  of  the  Mount  Weather  officials.  A  special 
photometer  has  been  devised  for  the  purpose  of  measuring  the  relative 
densities  of  clouds,  particularly  when  the  entire  sky  is  covered.  As 
soon  as  the  laboratory  is  completed  and  equipped  investigations  will 
be  begun  on  atmospheric  electricity,  its  origin,  distribution,  and  laws, 
the  causes  and  nature  of  precipitation,  heat  and  light  absorption,  and 
other  physical  phenomena  of  importance  to  the  meteorologist. 


THE   PRESENT    STATUS    OF  THE    MTROGEX   PROBLEM. 

By  A.  F.  Woods. 
Pathologist  and  Physiologist  and  Assistant  Chut  of  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

INTRODUCTION. 

One  of  the  greatest  problems  in  the  maintenance  of  soil  fertility 
for  the  maximum  production  of  crops  is  how  to  secure  and  keep  a 
sufficient  supply  of  available  nitrogen  at  the  least  cost.  For  mosl 
our  arable  lands  it  is  now  pretty  well  agreed  that  this  is  a  problem  of 
bacteriology,  with  the  soil  as  a  culture  medium.  As  in  most  other 
great  problems,  nature  and  practical  experience  hare  pointed  the 
way  to  its  solution.  Many  of  the  standard  practices  of  cultiva: 
crop  rotation,  etc..  which  have  developed  from  experience  have  very 
important  relations  to  bacterial  action  in  the  soil.  In  fact,  the  true 
relation  of  many  of  these  practices  can  be  understood  only  from  the 
standpoint  of  bacterial  activity.  It  remains  for  science  to  explain. 
systematize,  and  improve  practice,  placing  conditions  more  accu- 
rately tmder  our  control.  The  sources  of  nitrogen  supply  are.  first. 
the  nitrogen  already  contained  in  soils:  second,  that  supplied  to  the 
soil  by  the  decay  of  organic  matter;  and,  third,  the  fixation  of  atmos- 
pheric nitrogen. 

THE    DIRECTLY    AVAILABLE    NITROGEN    CONTENT    OF    SOILS. 

The  nitrogen  in  soils  is  of  two  types:    (1)  The  ammonia,  nitrites, 
and  nitrates,  in  which  forms  it  is  available  to  crops;  and  (2)  the- 
nitrogen  locked  up  in  organic  matter  and  not  directly  available.     The 
nitrate  nitrogen  (nitrogen  in  the  form  of  nitrates)  is  in  most  soils 
present  only  in  small  quantity.     This  supply  is  quickly  taken  out  by 
crops  or  washed  out  by  rains,  and  if  it  is  not  renewed  by  the  action 
of  certain  bacteria  on  the  nitrogenous  organic  matter  in  the  soil  or 
from  the  atmosphere  by  other  bacteria  it  must  be  added  direct: 
nitrate  of  soda  or  nitrate  of  potash,  or  some  other  manure  musl 
used    containing   directly    available   nitrogen.     Manures    containing 
directly  available  nitrogen  are  very  expensive.     The  best  of  these  is 
nitrate  of  soda,  and  at  the  present  rate  of  use  the  known  supply  will 
be  exhausted  in  less  than  fifty  years.     More  than  1.543.120  tons  were 
used   in   1905.     Prof.   Sylvanus   P.  Thompson   has    reiterated   in   a 

125 


126  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

recent  address0  the  prophecy  of  Prof .  William  Crookes.  that  we  shall 
have  a  wheat  famine  unless  the  yield  per  acre,  averaging  for  the 
whole  world  12T",  bushels,  can  be  increased.  He  believes  with 
Crookes  and  many  others  who  have  studied  the  question  carefully 
that  the  supply  of  nitrates  is  the  most  important  factor  in  the  situ- 
ation, and  it  is  important  not  only  for  wheat  but  for  all  other  crops. 
We  are  not.  howeYer,  as  Prof--.'  Thompson  seems  to  believe, 
dependent  on  the  electrical  method,  briefly  discussed  later  in  this 
paper,  for  obtaining  this  supply.  The  larger  part  of  the  nitrogen 
required  in  agriculture  is  now  and  will  always  be  obtained  from  the 
atmosphere  through  the     _  in  soil  bacteria.     By  careful 

iiiiisms  and  their  requirements  we  can  greatly 
increase  their  activity.  The  electrical  method,  however,  will  be  use- 
ful m  supplying  a  part  of  the  immediately  available  nitrate  needed 
in  intensive  agricultural  operati 

THE  DECAY  OF  ORGANIC  MATTER. 

The  organic  matters  which  are  added  to  the  soils  in  manures  and 
in  vegetable  and  animal  remains  must  go  through  certain  proo 
of  decay  before  the  plant  foods  they  contain  become  available  to 
crops.  Bacteria  and  fungi  of  various  kinds  are  the  active  agents 
which  bring  about  these  changes.  Decay  is  not  a  simple  process,  the 
in  all  placi  ider  all  conditions.     The  process  varies  when 

the  same  materials  under  the  same  conditions  are  acted  upon  by 
different  organisms  or  groups  of  bacteria  which  produce  it. 

In  general,  organic  materials  contain  two  classes  of  compounds: 
The  nit:    _        us  or  albuminoid  compounds,  like  flesh  and  blood 
and  the  protoplasm  of  plant  celh:  2    the  nonni' 

enous  compounds — the  carbohydrates  (such        suf!  starches,  and 

cellulose  and  the  hydrocarbons,  as  fats.  The  firs:  class  contains 
the  nitrogen  formerly  taken  from  the  soil  as  nitrate  by  some  plant. 
which  i:  its  highly  organized  form  is  unavailable  to  crops  until 
converted  into  ammonia  or  nitrate  again  by  certain  bacteria.  The 
compounds  of  the  second  class  serve  as  food  for  certain  bacteria 
which  are  al  .tain  their  nitrogen  from  the  air  and  will  be  dis- 

cussed later. 

The  highly  organized  nitrogenous  materials  above  mentioned,  in 
containing  a  good  supply  of  phosphates,  potash,  carbonate  of 
lime,  and  air.  moisture,  and  the  right  kinds  of  bacteria,  are  first  mod- 
ified or  digested  into  soluble  peptones  by  a  class  of  bacteria  which 
secrete  a    peptonizing  ferment.     Bae&hu   i  ■  Zopf,  B.  rfUn- 

;ron.  B.  myetrides  Fliigge.  etc..  are  good  examples  of  this 

p.  355,  1906. 


THE    PRESENT    STATUS    OF    THE    NITROGEN    PROBLEM.  127 

class.  These  peptonized  products  (peptones  and  albumoses)  are 
then  converted  into  ammonia  through  the  action  of  these  same  species 
and  other  ammonifying  bacteria.  The  ammonia  may  then  be  con- 
verted into  nitrite  by  another  class  of  bacteria,  principally  Nitro- 
monas  europse,  widely  distributed  hi  Europe,  and  by  species  of  Nitro- 
coccus,  said  to  be  peculiar  to  the  soils  of  America  and  Australia,0  The 
nitrite  is  then  oxidized  to  nitrate  by  still  another  kind  of  bacterium, 
Nitrobacter. 

On  the  other  hand,  if  the  soil  is  poorly  aerated  or  deficient  in  mois- 
ture, lime,  or  other  miner;:!  plant  foods,  the  course  of  this  digestion  or 
decay  of  organic  matter  is  modified.  Acids  accumulate,  and  the 
bacterial  action  is  largely  replaced  by  that  of  fungi  and  forms  of  bac- 
teria that  can  grow  in  the  presence  of  acids.  The  organic  matter 
becomes  more  or  less  pickled  or  humified.  The  more  active  forms  of 
peptonizing  and  ammonifying  bacteria  and  the  nitrifying  forms  are 
suppressed  by  the  conditions  unfavorable  to  their  development.  Pea ty 
soils  represent  the  extreme  of  this  type.  In  the  improvement  of  such 
soils  the  great  stores  of  nitrogen  and  carbon  of  the  humus  may  be 
made  available  by  the  addition  of  the  mineral  foods  if  they  are  lack- 
ing— especially  carbonate  of  lime  or  potash — by  proper  aeration,  and 
finally  by  the  addition  of  the  peptonizing,  ammonifying,  and  nitrify- 
ing bacteria.  In  the  present  state  of  our  knowledge  the  last  is  best 
accomplished  b}T  spreading  a  few  hundred  pounds  per  acre  of  good, 
naturally  rich,  well-worked  loam,  which  usually  contains  these  bacte- 
ria. Care  should  be  taken,  however,  to  secure  this  inoculating  soil 
from  fields  known  to  be  free  from  serious  weeds,  insects,  and  plant- 
disease  organisms.  It  is  to  be  hoped  that  our  knowledge  of  soil  bac- 
teriology will  develop  in  the  near  future  to  the  point  where  we  will  be 
able  to  determine  by  bacterial  analysis  what  organisms  are  present  in  a 
given  soil  and  what  bacteria  are  needed  to  raise  the  bacterial  activity 
to  the  highest  state  of  efficiency,  assuming  of  course  that  the  proper 
conditions  for  their  growth  have  been  supplied.  Briefly,  these  con- 
ditions are  a  warm  temperature,  good  aeration  brought  about  by 
thorough  and  frecment  cultivation,  proper  moisture  conditions,  also 
favored  by  thorough  and  frequent  cultivation,  good  drainage,  and  a 
gooel  supply  of  decaying  organic,  matter,  carbonate  of  lime,  phos- 
phates, and  other  mineral  foods. 

a  Hall,  Alfred  D.     The  Soil,  p.  72,  1903. 


12S 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


The  following  table,  taken  from  Bulletin  60  01  the  Delaware  College 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  by  F.  D.  Chester,  shows  the  vary- 
ing activity  of  some  of  the  bacteria  here  under  discussion: 

Chemical  functions  of  certain  soil  bacteria. 


Liquefaction   and    pep- 
tonization <>i"  media. 


1  ulturc. 


Bacillus  tumescent  Zopf: 

Culture  I 

Culture  5139 

Cul  

Cur.  ir    "     - 

Culture  5201 

Bacillus  cllenbackiensis  Caron: 

Culture  I 

Culture  5167 

Culture  5200 

BaciUus  alcaligcnrs  Petruscbky 

var.  i<ulvinatus  Chester 

:'igcncs   var.   dcla- 

rariensis  Chester 

Strcptothrix  scli  Chester 

■ri.r  brown  sp.  indt 

Bacillus  mycoides  Flugge 

descent  Ford 

lim.  (?) 

Bacillus  sp.  indt.: 

Culture  5140 


Gi  latin. 

Blood 

serum. 

+  + 

- 

+  4- 

+ 

++ 

+ 

+  + 

- 

+  + 

+ 

-- 

+ 

+  + 

+ 

+  + 

+ 

+ 

- 

+ 

+ 

+ 

+  + 

+ 

Milk. 


II. 
Ammo- 
nifying 
- 
cient. 


1.2 
1.6 

2.3 
3.0 
•1.2 

10.0 
25.0 
25.0 

Trace. 

13.0 
f.O 
5.0 

12.0 

10.0 


IV. 

\ei  lifying  coeffi- 
cient. 


III. 

.  ion 
of  nitra 

to  nitrites.  Dext  rose 
broth. 


Saccha- 
rose 

broth. 


1.  66 


1.85 

3.  tO 

1.40 


2.55 
2.44 


2.  HI 
1.55 


0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2.  22 

2.71 

1.80 

1.S0 

0 

0 

1.30 


111  this  table  a  single  plus  sign  (  +)  indicates  feeble  or  slow  activity, 
a  double  phis  (  +  +  )  indicates  a  strong  activity  of  the  kind  indicated 
he  head  of  the  column,  and  a  minus  sign  (  — )  indicates  no  activity 
of  the  kind.  The  figures  in  column  II  indicate  the  relative  ammonify- 
ing activity,  and  those  in  column  IV  the  acidifying  activity.  One 
important  deduction  from  this  table  is  that  the  different  species  vary 
widely  in  their  ability  to  accomplish  certain  work  and  that  cultures  of 
the  scies  vary  greatly.     There  is  therefore  opportunity   to 

increase  bacterial  efficiency  in  a  soil  by  selection  and  introduction  of 
the  most  effective  species  and  the  most  effective  strains  of  these  spe- 
and  to  reduce  in  number  the  inefficient  and  injurious  species, 
king  of  conditions  favorable  to  a  beneficial  or  desired 
is  not  sufficient  to  insure  its  development  unless  there  is  a 
large  number  of  individuals  of  the  desired  species  present.     There  are 
many    species    of    bacteria — good,    bad,    and    indifferent — that    can 
develop  under  the  same  conditions,  just  as  there  are  many  weeds  that 
grow  vigorously  under  conditions  favorable  to  crops.     It  may  be 


THE    PRESENT    STATUS    OF    THE    NITROGEN    PROBLEM.  129 

necessary  in  some  cases  to  reduce  the  number  of  these  forms.  It 
is  essential  that  an  accurate  knowledge  be  gained  of  all  the  organisms 
occurring  in  various  soils,  the  changes  that  they  produce,  their  sym- 
biotic and  antagonistic  relations  and  the  conditions  affecting  them, 
and  the  relation  of  their  activity  to  crop  production.  Chester"  has 
suggested  a  very  good  method  for  accomplishing  this  in  a  uniform 
manner.  A  few  examples  of  some  of  his  determinations  of  bacterial 
or  zymotic  efficiency  of  various  soils  will  be  instructive. 

A  soil  from  the  experiment  station  garden,  Newark,  Del.,  consisting 
of  a  heavy  clay  loam  which  had  been  brought  to  a  high  state  of  fertility 
by  plowing  under  crimson  clover  for  a  number  of  years  and  kept  under 
active  tillage,  gave  the  average  results  of  two  analyses  as  follows: 

Per  gram 
of  dry  soil. 

Streptothrix  soli 1,  COO,  000 

Bacillus  tumesa  ns 1,  200, 000 

Bacillus  alcaligenes  var.  delavariensis 330,  000 

Total 3, 130,  000 

As  shown  in  the  table  on  page  128,  B.  turnescens  is  the  only  one  of  these 
organisms  that  can  convert  nitrogenous  matter  into  peptones  with  any 
degree  of  energy.  The  relative  ammonifying  power  of  these  organ- 
isms is  proportionate  to  the  ammonifying  power  of  the  individual 
organism  and  to  the  number  of  organisms.  On  this  basis  this  soil 
has  a  relative  ammonifying  efficiency  of  13.73  and  an  acidifying 
efficiency  of  2.22. 

Nearly  a  year  later  (April  11,  1903)  an  examination  of  this  same 
soil  showed  a  great  reduction  in  the  number  and  activity  of  the 
bacteria  present: 

Per  gram 
of  dry  soil. 

Streplothrix  soli 20.  000 

Bacillus  turnescens 745,  000 

Bacillus  alcaligenes  var.  pulrinatus 20, 000 

Bacillus  ellenbachiensis 170,  000 

Bacillus  mycoides 20,  000 

Streptothrix  sp.  indt 319,  000 

Total 1,  294.  000 

The  relative  ammonifying  efficiency  of  the  soil  at  this  time  was 
determined  to  be  only  2.48  and  the  total  acidifying  efficiency  1.81. 
The  bacterial  or  zymotic  efficiency  of  this  soil  is  therefore  much  lower 
than  it  was  at  the  first  examination. 

"  Bui.  G5,  Del.  Col.  Agric.  Exp.  Sta. 
3    a  1906 9 


130  Yi  ARBooK    OF    THE   DEPARTMENT   OF   AGRICULTURE. 

i  to  May  11.  1903,  a  simple  of  soil  from  sandy  land  which  had  been 
brought  into  a  good  state  of  fertility  was  examined,  with  the  following 
Its: 

-ram 
of  d  r. 

Ba<  ■.sis 140.000 

Bacillus  alcaligenes  var.  delarariensis 3S0.  000 

Bacilli's  I  -0. 000 

Total 540.  000 

The  relative  ammonifying  efficiency  is  8.9;  the  acidifying  efficiency 
only  o.'v  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  bacterial  efficiency  of 
this  soil  is  nearly  three  times  as  great  as  that  of  the  station  soil  at  the 
id  examination,  though  the  latter  contained  approximately  three 
times  the  number  of  bacteria.  This  is  explained  by  the  great  effi- 
ciency of  Bacillus  (.llcnbachiensis. 

Nitrification  and  nitrogen-fixing  activity  can  be  determined  and 
expressed  on  a  relative  basis  in  a  similar  manner.  The  addition  of 
available  nitrogen  to  soils  through  the  decay  of  nitrogenous  matter 
can  never  exceed  or  even  approximate  the  amount  taken  from  the 
soil  in  the  production  of  that  organic  material.  It  represents  a  gain 
in  nitrogen  only  in  the  sense  that  it  is  saved.  It  is  not  desirable  that 
its  conversion  into  soluble  form  should  much  exceed  the  demands  of 
the  crop:  otherwise  it  may  be  lost.  It  is  evident,  however,  that  with 
the  great  waste  of  organic  matter  which  must  inevitably  go  on  we  must 
have  other  sources  of  nitrogen  to  cover  the  loss  and  meet  the  rapidly 
increasing  demand  for  it,  not  only  in  agriculture  but  in  other  arts. 

THE    FIXATION    OF    ATMOSPHERIC    XITEOGEX    BY    SOIL    BACTERIA. 

Leaving, now, the  question  of  the  changes  in  the  nitrogenous  organic 
matter  in  the  -oil.  we  will  consider  the  fixation  of  atmospheric  nitro- 
gen by  a  class  of  bacteria  that  uses  the  carbohydrate  constituents 
(sugar,  starches,  cellulose,  etc.)  of  the  vegetable  matter  in  the  soil. 
There  are  two  classes  of  bacteria  that  can  fix  atmospheric  nitrogen: 
(1)  Those  that  are  not  associated  with  any  particular  crops,  and  2 
the  root-nodule  forms  associated  principally  with  legumes.  The  first 
p  depends  on  the  carbohydrate  material  in  the  organic  matter  of 
the  -oil  derived  from  decaying  vegetation  or  from  certain  minute 
(the  Cyanophyceae  or  blue-green  aigsB).  The  second  group  depend;- 
principally  on  the  carbohydrates  supplied  by  the  plants  in  the  roots 
of  which  the  bacteria  are  growing.  The  latter  class  will  be  considered 
later. 

The  independent  soil  forms  are  widely  distributed  and  belong  to 
several  genera.  A  very  good  comparison  of  some  of  these  has  been 
made  by  Chester,  and  is  shown  in  the  table  on  the  following  page 
taken  from  Bulletin  66,  Delaware  College  Agricultural  Experiment 
Station. 


THE    PRESENT    STATUS    OF    THE    NITROGEN    PROBLEM. 


131 


Gains  of  n  <  ecliabyari  assimilating  organisms. 


Si.  i                            tn  culture. 

Milligrams 
Dura-      oi  nitrogen 
tion  of    per  100  c.  c.  of 
cuUure  amnoculated 
in  days.       medium 
(blank'. 

Millie 
of  oil  ■ 
per  lOOc.c. 
in  culture. 

Cains  of 
nil  rogen  in 
culture  in 
milligrams 
per  100  c.c. 

Percent- 
age of 

gaiu  of 
nitro- 
gen.* 

organism  purccul- 


M 

40 
15 
30 

10 

28 

IG 
28 
15 
30 
28 
15 
30 
28 
28 
28 
28 

15 
30 

15 
30 

0. 600 
.  538 

.490 
.578 
.440 
.  4  to 

.400 
.  400 
.490 

.578 
l.CO 
.490 

.  578 
1.00 

l.Oi) 

1.00 
1.00 

. ;  o 

.  578 

.490 
.57S 

l.  184 

2.450 
1.490 
1.000 

1.710 
1.720 

1.  872 
1.542 
2.12 
1.172 
2.940 
1.87 
1.81 
1.87 
2.25 

1.642 

1.792 

2.  536 

0.  too 

1.470 
.  994 
t.872 

1.011 

1.  151 

1.3» 

i  se 

.888 

.064 

1. 12 

.483 

2.362 
.87 

.81 

.87 

1.  25 

1.102 
1.312 

1.502 
1.978 

100 

Do 



Do 

r<:< ■.'.'■'«.''  tnmesttns 

Do            

27* 

324 
23 1 
259 

J'tci.doi:                    set  ns    var.    nanli- 

§27 

Do 

330 
160 



Do 

Do                                          

1C7 

112 
1S9 

401 

Do 

S7 
81 

s7 

. 

125 

icterwitfc— 

235 

227 

acster  with— 

26G 

:  [2 

"Tli  ttiis  column  are  aboul  108  lose  than  those  given  in  the  bulleti     cil   d     nd  showthe 

actual  par  cent  of  gain  in  nitrogen. 

Ill  warm,  well-aerated  soils  containing  sugars,  starches,  and  cellulose 
from  decaying  grasses  and  other  vegetation,  and  well  supplied  with 
carbonate  of  lime  or  other  bases  and  mineral  foods,  these  bacteria  fix 
considerable  atmospheric  nitrogen.  The  amount,  of  course,  depends 
upon  the  nature  and  amount  of  carbohydrate  food  available,  the 
specie.-,  present,  their  number,  and  the  degree  of  favorabieness  of  the 
other  factors  mentioned.  In  ordinary  cultivated  soils  the  supply  of 
available  carbohydrate  materials  is  the  factor  that  usually  limits  free- 
nitrogen  fixation.  The  almost  complete  removal  of  crops  leaves  very 
little  carbonaceous  food  for  these  bacteria.  To  stimulate  the  develop- 
ment of  these  bacteria,  assuming  that  they  are  present,  it  is  essential 
that  considerable  carbonaceous  matter  be  incorporated  into  the  soil. 

In  grass  lands  and  in  wild  lands  generally,  where  much  of  the  carbon- 
aceous matter  produced  finally  becomes  incorporated  with  the  soil,  the 
fixation  of  atmospheric  nitrogen  by  the  Azotobacter  group"  and  the 

a  Beijerinck,  who  described  these  forms,  hold?  that  Azotobacter  can  fix  atmospheric 
nitrogen  only  ir  association  with  other  forms,  such  as  Granulobaeter  and  Radiobacter. 

This  point,  however,  is  not  yet  definitely  settled.     It  is  settled,  though,  that  these 
-  working  together  fix  nitrogen  much  more  actively  than  when  they  work  inde- 
pendently. 


132  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

other  independent  nitrogen-fixing  bacteria  is  very  great.  An  exami- 
nation of  two  fields  at  Rothamsted  which  had  run  wild  for  more  than 
twenty  years  showed  an  accumulation  of  nitrogen  of  approximately  45 
pounds  per  acre  per  annum  hi  a  field  poorly  supplied  with  carbonate  of 
lime,  and  98  pounds  per  acre  per  annum  in  a  field  well  supplied  with 
carbonate  of  lime.  Bacteriological  tests  of  these  fields  showed  that 
Azotobacter  was  present  in  much  larger  numbers  and  had  greater 
powers  of  fixation  in  the  field  containing  an  abundance  of  carbonate  of 
lime.'7 

This  has  been  going  on  in  connection  with,  but  entirely  independent 
of,  nitrification  for  ages,  wherever  the  conditions  are  favorable  and  the 
proper  bacteria  are  present.  This  is  true  especially  of  prairie  soils  in 
all  parts  of  the  world.  The  work  of  these  organisms  represents  an 
absolute  gain  hi  available  nitrogen.  It  is  highly  essential  that  we 
should  learn  more  about  them  and  get  better  control  of  their  activities 
for  the  benefit  of  agriculture.  An  attempt  has  been  made  to  do  this  in 
the  preparation  of  "'Alinit/''  which  is  a  culture  of  Bacillus  eUeribachi- 
.  This  is.  however,  a  species  of  very  small,  if  any.  nitrogen-fixing 
power.  It  is  of  more  value  as  a  peptonizer  and  ammonifier.  When  it 
has  given  good  results  it  has  probably  been  where  it  was  needed  for  such 
work  rather  than  nitrogen  fixation.  Success  in  the  use  of  cultures  can 
come  only  when  bacteria  of  high  efficiency  are  selected  for  a  particular 
kind  of  work,  and  are  used  under  conditions  favorable  to  their  develop- 
ment and  where  examination  indicates  that  they  are  needed.  A  few 
failures  due  to  imperfect  knowledge  must  not  discourage  workers  in 
this  important  field.  Excellent  work  is  being  accomplished  hi  the 
study  of  these  forms  hi  this  country,  especially  by  Voorhees  and  Lip- 
man,  of  the  Xew  Jersey  station,  and  Chester,  of  the  Delaware  station.6 

ROOT-NODULE    BACTERIA. 

The  bacteria  of  this  class,  like  the  Azotobacter  group,  are  able  under 
favorable  conditions  to  fix  more  or  less  atmospheric  nitrogen  hide- 
pendent  of  legumes.  They  reach  their  highest  efficiency,  however, 
when  growing  hi  the  roots  of  legumes  (clovers,  alfalfa,  peas,  be 
.  where  they  usually  form  nodules.  The  origin  of  the  specii 
sibly  from  a  soil  form.  Radiobacter,  commonly  growing  in  associa- 
tion with  Azotobacter. 

The  value  of  leguminous  crops  as  soil  improvers  has  been  well 
known  for  centuries,  and  they  are  regularly  used  for  this  purpose, 
especially  in  the  older  agricultural  countries.  It  is.  however,  only 
since  the  work  of  Hellriegel  and  TTilfarth  in  1SSS  that  it  has  been 

a  Science,  ivv,  .  XXII.  p.  455. 

•  Bui.  1n>.  X.J.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.,  and  the  station  reports  for  1903  and  1904;  also 
the  Dela  a  q  bulletins  previously  referred  to. 


THE    PRESENT    STATUS    OF    THE    NITROGEN    PROBLEM.  133 

universally  recognized  that  the  ability  of  these  crops  to  grow  in  soil 
devoid  of  nitrogen  is  due  to  the  presence  of  certain  bacteria  in  the 
root  nodules.  These  bacteria  have  been  carefully  studied  by  many 
investigators  in  Europe  and  in  this  country,  and  much  valuable  infor- 
mation has  been  secured  regarding  them.  The  literature  of  the  sub- 
ject has  been  reviewed  so  many  times  in  various  publications  that 
it  is  not  necessary  to  go  over  it  again.0 

It  has  been  amply  demonstrated,  not  only  by  hundreds  of  years 
of  actual  experience  but  by  numberless  carefully  conducted  experi- 
ments in  many  countries  and  under  widely  varying  conditions,  that 
clovers  and  numerous  other  legumes  supplied  with  tubercle  bacteria 
obtain  from  the  air  through  the  agency  of  these  bacteria,  under  favor- 
able conditions,  all  the  nitrogen  they  require,  and  that  they  leave 
in  the  soil  considerable  quantities  for  succeeding  crops.  In  Germany 
the  amount  of  nitrogen  added  to  the  soil  by  legumes,  besides  that  taken 
off  in  the  crop,  is  estimated  at  200  pounds  per  acre.  In  the  United 
States  the  average  for  sixteen  States  is  122  pounds,  equivalent  to 
not  less  than  800  to  1,000  pounds  of  nitrate  of  soda  per  acre.a  These 
effects,  of  course,  are  secured  where  the  conditions  for  fixation  are 
favorable,  viz,  where  the  soil  is  abundantly  supplied  with  nodule 
bacteria  of  high  efficiency  and  where  the  available  nitrogen  content 
of  the  soil  is  low  and  the  soil  is  well  supplied  with  carbonate  of  lime 
or  its  equivalent,  and  when  the  phosphates  and  other  elements  of 
available  plant  food  are  present  in  sufficient  quantity.  If  the  soil 
is  already  rich  in  nitrates,  the  leguminous  crop  may  do  no  more  than 
maintain  the  nitrogen  equilibrium.  This  is  an  important  thing  to  do, 
however,  inasmuch  as  this  nitrogen  will  be  required  by  subsequent 
crops  in  the  rotation  and  the  requirement  of  expensive  nitrogenous 
manures  is  thereby  reduced. 

VARIETIES    AND    EFFICIENCY    OF    ROOT-NODULE    BACTERIA. 

It  is  now  pretty  well  agreed  that  the  nodule  bacteria  on  most 
legumes  belong  to  the  same  species.  However,  there  are  well-defined 
strains  or  varieties  especially  adapted  to  certain  genera  and  species 
of  legumes  which  adapt  themselves  with  more  or  less  difficulty  to 
other  genera  and  species.  The  immediate  efficiency  of  the  bacteria 
will,  therefore,  depend  upon  the  natural  or  artificial  inoculation  of 
the  particular  legume  with  the  best  strain  of  bacteria  adapted  to  it. 
In  soils,  therefore,  where  it  is  desired  to  cultivate  a  particular  legume, 
and  where  that  legume  or  a  closely  related  species  has  not  been  suc- 
cessfully cultivated  and  well  supplied  with  nodules,  it  is  desirable 
that  the  proper  bacteria  be  supplied.  Experiments  and  practical 
tests  made  by  this  Department  show  that  there  is  great  variation 

a  See  Bui.  71,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 


134  YEARBOOK    OP    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGKICVLTV 

in  the  nitrogen-fixing  power  of  these  bacteria,  dependent   in  part 

upon  the  conditions  under  which  they  have  been  growing.     If  they 
are  in  a  soil  which  provides  them  with  an  abundant  supply  of  c 
bined  ni  they  ultimately  Lose,  t-  ge  extent,  the  power 

of  fixing  atmospheric  nitrogen.     Under  such  e  of 

little  or  no  benefit  to  the  crop.     It  is  an  easy  matt  select  strains 

of  high  nitrogen-fixing  power  as  indicated  by  the  •  aria 

on  the  crop  when  growing  in  comparatively  nitrogen-free  -     Is      The 
cultivation  of  these  selected  strains  on  nitrogen-free  media   f 
few   2  a    greatly  increases  their  nitrogen-fixing 

therefore  their  value  for  inoculation  purposes.     Exactly   ■ 

sinks  apply  to  these  bacteria  as  apply  to  other  plants.     There 
are  some  strains  of  beets  that  will  make  IS  to  20  per  oe 
These  are  worth  cultivating  for  their  sugar:  but  the  ordinary    - 
from  which  these  have  been  developed  by  selection  contained 
5  or  6"  per  tent  of  sugar.     A  man  who  wants  to  make  a  sv 
growing  sugar  beets  plants  seed?  of   high  sugar-producing 
The  importance  of  using  selected  seed  for  all  crops  lias  been  so  amply 
demonstrated  that  no  argument  in  favor  of  the  practice  is  needed. 
It  is  the  very  foundation  of  progress  in  plant  culture.     S  eria 

are  no  exceptions  to  the  rule,  and  pure-bred  bacteria  for  specific  « 
are  as  clearly  an  economic  necessity  as  pure-bred  cattle  or  pure-bred 
sugar  beers. 

-;niBrTio>  -  >il. 

We  are  often  told  that  these  bacteria  arc  widely  distributed  and 
are  present  in  n         -     .-.     This  is  fan        -     -plied  to  the  older  .. 
vated  areas,  where  various  legumes  have  been  cultivated,  but  it 
not  follow  that  soils  containing  a  few  or  even  a  considerable  nun 
of  these  bacteria  would  not  be  benefited  by  inoculation  with  - 
kinds  of  bacteria.     The  varieties  present  ma;  e  adapted  to  the 

legume  which  it  is  desired  to  plant,  and  may  have  little  or  no  benefi- 
cial effect  on  it,  or  if  the  proper  strain  is  present  in  small  numbers 
it  may,  ami  usually  does,  take  several  years  to  bring  the  bacterial 
content  of  the  soil  up  to  an  efficient  basis.     This,  of  course,  i- 
slow  a  pi    cess.     It  would  be  just  as  reasonable  to  depend  on  getl 

>p  of  clover  or  bluegrass  in  this  way.  It  can  be  done  in  some 
places,  but  it  is  at  least  a  makeshift  method,  and  does  not  appeal  to 
a  practical  up-to-date  farmer. 

In  newer  regions,  where  legume?  have  not  been  cultivated,  very 
few  soils  ha>  i  gh  of  these  bacteria  in  them  to  be  of  any'pnu 

value,    and    inoculation    is    essential.     This    may    be    accomplished 
either  by  the  use  of  soil  from  a  field  where  the  crop  is  making  a  vigor- 
growth,  with  the  roots  well  supplied  with  nodules,  indicating  that 
the  soil  contains  the  right  bacteria,  or  by  the  use  of  pure  cultures 


THE    PRESENT    STATUS    OF    THE    NITROGEN    PROBLEM.  135 

from  selected  plants.  The  soil  method,  of  course,  introduces  not 
only  the  nodule-forming  species,  but  numerous  oilier  forms,  such 
as  those  previously  discussed  in  this  paper,  and  these  may  often  he 
as  much  needed  as  the  tubercle  forms.  "Where  they  as  well  as  the 
nodule  forms  are  needed,  soil  transfer  is  usually  the  most  satisfac- 
tory method  of  inoculation.  This  is  likely  to  be  the  case  in  "sour" 
soils.  It  is,  however,  expensive  and  cumbersome,  especially  where 
the  soil  has  to  be  transported  for  some  distance. 

Another  and  much  more  serious  drawback  to  this  method  is  the 
danger  of  introducing  into  a  farm  injurious  and  disease-producing 
bacteria  and  fungi,  as  well  as  troublesome  weeds.  It  is  not  safe  to 
use  soils  from  areas  in  which  such  pests  occur.  Anyone  who  has  seen 
the  great  injury  wrought  by  root  nematodes,  the  wilt  diseases  of 
melons,  cowpeas,  tobacco,  cotton,  tomatoes,  potatoes,  flax,  the  black- 
rot  of  cabbage  and  cauliflower,  the  various  stem  and  root  diseases 
of  clover  and  alfalfa,  and  diseases  of  other  crops  almost  too  numer- 
ous to  mention,  and  widely  distributed,  will  investigate  carefully 
before  importing  soil  that  may  contain  the  spores  of  these  organisms. 

PURK-Cn.TFRE    INOCULATION". 

For  the  reasons  above  mentioned,  pure-culture  inoculation  must 
eventually  mainly  replace  the  soil-transfer  methods  for  all  kinds  of 
soil  inoculation,  but  this  has  not  yet  been  put  on  a  practical  basis 
for  any  except  the  nodule  bacteria.  The  improved  cultural  and  selec- 
tion methods  introduced  by  this  Department  in  the  practical  handling 
of  these  forms  have  brought  within  reach  of  every  farmer  who  ma}*  need 
them  pure  cultures  of  the  most  virile,  vigorous,  and  best  types  of  root- 
nodule  bacteria  for  each  particular  leguminous  crop.  It  requires  care 
and  skill,  however,  to  make  and  keep  these  cultures  in  good  condition. 
For  lack  of  this,  many  who  have  tried  to  make  these  cultures  have 
failed.  The  pure-culture  method  has  come  to  stay,  however.  It  will 
be  improved  by  experience  and  continue  to  increase  in  usefulness  in 
the  hands  of  careful  and  progressive  workers.  It  is  suggested,  before 
using  cultures  from  any  source,  that  farmers  secure  from  this  Depart- 
ment and  read  carefully  Farmers'  Bulletin  240.  The  Department  of 
Agriculture  is  distributing  the  bacteria  during  the  present  season 
(1906)  in  nitrogen-free  liquid  cultures  hermetically  sealed.  Excel- 
lent results  can  also  be  obtained  in  distributing  the  cultures  in  dry 
form.  They  must  be  dried  quickly,  however,  from  solutions  con- 
taining very  small  amounts  of  soluble  salts,  and  kept  dry  until  ready 
for  use;  otherwise  they  are  likely  to  mold  and  spoil.  This  Depart- 
ment has  used  this  method  very  successfully  for  several  years.  It  is 
also  used  successfully  by  Ferguson,  of  the  Virginia  Experiment 
Station/7 

a  See  Bui.  159,  Virginia  Agr.  Exp.  Sta. 


136  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

THE    FIXATION    OF    NITROGEN    FROM   THE    ATMOSPHERE    BY   ELECTRICAL 

METHODS. 

While  much  can  be  accomplished  through  the  agency  of  soil  bac- 
teria in  conserving  and  increasing  the  supply  of  combined  nitrogen, 
there  will  always  be  a  demand,  in  intensive  culture  especially,  for  an 
immediately  available  supply  of  nitrates  or  other  forms  of  fixed  nitro- 
gen. The  great  Chilean  deposits,  which  furnished  more  than  one  and 
a  half  million  tons  in  1905,  will,  at  the  present  rate  of  use,  according 
to  careful  estimates,  be  exhausted  in  less  than  fifty  years.  It  has 
long  been  known,  however,  that  atmospheric  nitrogen  can  be  oxidized 
under  the  influence  of  electricity,  producing  nitric  oxid  fumes,  which 
are  then  combined  with  water,  to  form  nitric  acid,  or  with  quicklime, 
forming  calcium  nitrate.  Other  bases  may  also  be  used.  Various 
attempts  have  been  made  from  time  to  time  to  develop  a  process  by 
which  nitrogen  can  be  combined  commercially.  The  most  promising 
results  have  thus  far  been  secured  with  Franck's  process  of  making 
calcium  cyanamid  and  with  the  Birkland  and  Eyde  process  of  pro- 
ducing nitrates.  The  former  process  consists  in  combining  nitrogen 
with  the  carbides  of  alkalis,  producing  cyanids,  or,  in  the  case  of 
calcium,  producing  calcium  cyanamid  (CaCNg),  contaming  35  per  cent 
of  nitrogen — more  than  twice  the  amount  present  hi  Chile  saltpeter. 
The  calcium  cyanamid,  when  properly  used,  has  proved  to  be  an  excel- 
lent nitrogenous  fertilizer  for  many  crops,  and  quite  equal  to  ammonia 
compounds,  into  which  it  can  be  readily  converted.  The  ammonia 
thus  produced  can  be  further  oxidized  by  conducting  it  over  highly 
heated  metallic  oxids,  thus  producing  nitric  acid. 

The  Birkland  and  Eyde  process,  however,  appears  to  be  the  most 
promising  as  a  means  of  producing  nitrates.  A  special  electric  furnace 
is  used,  in  which  an  alternating  electric  arc  between  3,000  and  4,000 
volts  is  produced  in  connection  with  a  large  electro  magnet,  which 
forces  it  to  take  the  form  of  a  roaring  disk  of  flame.  Air  is  forced 
through  this  furnace  at  the  rate  of  about  3,000  cubic  feet  per  minute, 
the  nitrogen  being  oxidized  in  the  furnace  to  nitric  oxid.  These 
fumes  are  then  collected,  and  after  further  oxidation  are  absorbed 
in  water  towers,  forming  nitric  acid,  or  by  powdered  quicklime, 
forming  calcium  nitrate.  Of  course,  the  nitric  acid  can  be  com- 
bined with  almost  any  desirable  base,  such  as  soda  or  potash.  With 
cheap  water  power  nitrates  can  be  produced  by  this  process  to  com- 
pete in  cost  with  nitrate  of  soda.a 

These  direct  pi  of  securing  nitrogen  will  certainly  be  rapidly 

improved,  and  what  has  been  accomplished  already  in  this  direction 

should  remove  the  last  vestige  of  doubt  that  we  shall  be  able  to  secure 

at  a  reasonable  cost  all  of  the  immediately  available  nitrogen  we  may 

i.  in  addition  to  the  great  supply  that  may  be  secured  through 

ion. 


oS.v  "Nature,  "   v-l.  7:1.  p.  355;  also,  Exp.  Sta.  Record.  Vol.  XVII.  pp.  74(v-750. 
Fi  r  a  full,  illustrated  account  Bee  Engineering  News.  vol.  57.  No.  G.  pp.  159,  151. 


OBJECT-LESSON  ROADS. 

By  Logan  Waller  Page, 
Director  of  the  Office  of  Public  Roads. 

NECESSITY    FOE,    INSTRUCTION    IN    ROAD    BUILDING. 

Improvement  of  the  public  roads  of  the  United  States  is  a  work  of 
so  great  magnitude  and  involves  the  solution  of  so  many  problems 
of  economic  importance  that  it  demands  attention  from  every  unit  of 
government,  from  the  township  to  the  National  Government.  At  the 
present  time  the  township,  the  county,  and  the  State  are  providing 
means  for  the  construction  and  maintenance  of  roads  to  the  extent  of 
approximately  $70,000,000  annually,  according  to  information  com- 
piled by  this  Office.  It  is  unfortunately  true,  however,  that  the 
expenditure  of  the  greater  portion  of  this  large  sum  is  intrusted  to 
men  who  have  practically  no  knowledge  of  road  building  and  who  are 
acting  under  systems  of  road  administration  and  management  that  are 
obsolete  and  totally  inadequate. 

Until  very  recent  years  highway  engineering  has  received  slight  at- 
tention in  the  engineering  schools  of  the  country,  and,  consequently, 
the  supply  of  properly  equipped  men  for  this  branch  of  engineering 
has  not  been  equal  to  the  demand.  With  approximately  2,300,000 
miles  of  rural  highways  in  the  United  States  and  an  approximate 
annual  expenditure  of  $70,000,000,  the  absolute  necessity  of  placing 
road  construction  and  administration  on  a  correct  basis  may  there- 
fore be  seen. 

ESTABLISHMENT    OF    THE    OFFICE    OF    ROAD    INQUIRY. 

Congress,  in  1893,  realizing  that  much  work  of  an  investigative  and 
educational  character,  which  could  be  done  best  by  the  National 
Government,  was  necessary  before  any  effectual  progress  could  be 
made  in  the  improvement  of  public  roads,  established  the  Office  of 
Road  Inquiry  for  the  purpose  of  investigating  systems  of  road  man- 
agement and  disseminating  information  on  the  subject  of  road  build- 
ing. An  appropriation  of  $10,000  was  made  to  carry  out  the  provi- 
sions of  this  act.  Slight  changes  have  been  made  from  time  to  time 
in  the  language  of  the  appropriation  bills,  and  the  amounts  have 

137 


13s  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    ! 

been  increased  until  the  Office  of  Public  R  - 

the  investigation       -  -  "    ~ 

advice  on  road  -         restigation 

ical  and  - 

upon   t:  - 

1907  is  $7 

The  act  of  ?ress  provides  for  r  -  nal 

and  investigative  work.  _         on  the 

involved,  and  the  other  upon  the  pra  J  featores 

road  construction  and  maintenance.     The  work  b 
is  defined  by  the  requirement  that  . 

investigated.     The  practical  side  of  the  work  by  the  pro- 

ds  of  the  bill  winch  require  that  expert  advi 
road  materials  be  investigated.     The   g        g   :>f  expert  a  -  I 

deal  primarily  with  the  construction  and  maintenance  of  all  • 
roads,  while  the  investigation  of  road  materials  inclu;. 
laboratory  t*  ell  as  an  investigation  into  the  quantity, 

and  location  of  road-making  materials  in  all  parts 

OBJZCT-I.E^SOX    ROADS. 

The  Office  of  Public  Roads,  in  endeavoring  to  carry  out  the  pro- 
visions of  the  act  of  Congress,  has  adopted  a  method  of  instruction 
known  as  the  object-lesson  road  method.      Its  purpose  > 
local  road  builders  in  the  principles  of  road  construction,  to  demon- 
te  the  advantage  of  a  properly  built  road,  and  I        ^certain  the 
local  material  available  for  road  building. 
The  Office  maintains  a  corps  of  highway  engineers,  expert  road 
foremen,  and  machinery  operators  for  field  duty;  and  also  chem 
geol   _  a  :.,ers  to  investigate  by  la" 

properties  and  relative  values  of  road  materials.     Wh 
or  community  desires  to  improve  its  roads,  applies"  -  made  to 

I  )ffice  on  a  form  which  is  furnished  upor.  -: . 

provides  that  the  local  authorities  shah  g 
all   materials,  common  labor,  teams,  and  fuel,  the  Office  furni-" 
-urveys,  estimates,  expert  su]  a,  and  i 

hinery.     The   following   questions   accompa: 
form  sent  out : 

rich  plan  u 
What  is  i': 
WhaJ  is  the  general  |  L,  lolling,  or  hilly? 

i  od  -what  te 


a  This 


OBJECT-LESSOX    EOADS.  139 

< 

Have  you  a  crasher  or  any  road-building  machinery  that  you  will  furnish?  If  so, 
what? 

What  is  the  cost  of  labor  per  day? 

What  amount  of  money  is  available  to  be  expended  on  this  work? 

What  months  are  preferable  for  carrying  on  this  work'?     Why? 

What  Is  the  earliest  date  this  work  can  start? 

What  kinds  of  road-building  materials  are  locally  available,  and  how  far  are  they 
situated  from  the  road'?  Samples  of  such  materials  should  be  selected  and  shipped  to 
this  Office,  that  tests  may  be  made  before  construction  is  started.  Blank  forms  and 
instructions  are  supplied  for  this  purpose. 

The  system  now  in  effect  provides  for  an  inspection  report  by  the 
engineer  first  sent  out  to  examine  the  road  proposed  for  improvement, 
this  report  covering  the  following  essential  points: 

Miles  of  road  inspected  and  location. 

Length  of  section  to  be  improved. 

Relative  amount  of  travel  over  road  compared  with  other  mads  in  vicinity. 

Local  authorities  having  jurisdiction  over  road  to  be  improved. 

Individuals  or  organizations  especially  interested  in  the  work. 

Amount  from  public  treasury. 

Amount  from  private  subscription. 

Total  amount  of  money  ready  for  the  work. 

Nearest  shipping  point.     Xante  of  railroad. 

Best  time  of  year  for  doing  work  (state  earliest  and  latest  months),  and  why. 

Nature  of  materials  and  distance  from  road. 

Present  grades:  drainage;  nature  of  soil. 

Cost  of  labor  and  teams  per  day. 

Engineers  or  surveyors  in  vicinity  competent  to  make  plans  and  profiles  of  road. 

If,  after  consideration  of  the  inspection  report,  it  is  decided  to 
undertake  the  work  of  construction,  surveys  are  made  and  estimates 
prepared,  after  which  the  expert  foreman,  machinery  operator,  and 
necessary  road  machinery  are  provided.  Daily  reports  are  required 
from  the  beginning  of  the  work.  These  daily  reports  contain  exact 
and  detailed  information,  as  shown  by  the  copy  of  the  blank  form 
on  the  following  page.  It  will  be  seen  from  the  form  that  the  unit 
cost  may  be  computed  from  the  data  contained  in  these  reports, 
thereby  affording  a  basis  for  estimating  cost  of  additional  mileage. 

When  an  object-lesson  road  is  completed  a  final  report  and  sum- 
mary of  the  work  done  is  prepared  by  the  engineer  in  charge  of  the 
construction,  which  shows  all  details  of  the  work,  such  as  the  length, 
width,  thickness,  and  kind  of  surfacing  material;  method  of  construc- 
tion and  time  consumed;  kind  and  size  of  machinery  used  for  excava- 
tion, crushing,  loading,  distributing,  and  rolling  stone;  kind,  size,  and 
length  of  all  side,  cross,  and  under  drams  and  culverts;  together  with 
the  total  cost  of  the  road  to  the  community  and  to  this  Office,  and  the 
unit  cost  (that  is,  the  cost  per  cubic  yard,  square  yard,  or  ton)  for 
excavation,  quarrying,  crushing,  hauling,  spreading,  sprinkling,  and 
rolling. 


140  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Daily  Report  of  Work  on  Object-Lesson  Road  at  

Date: .     Weather:—  .     Length  of  working  day: hours. 


Signature: . 

Force  empli 

Work  done. 

Total  in    Pay  pet- 
hours    \     hour 
or  days.  ■  or  day. 

Total. 

Earth     exca- 

Sta.        to  Sta. 

Su  bgrade 

First    course 

placed 

Second  course 

sq.  vds. 

Excavation: 

Sta.   ...to  Sta.  ... 

Sta.   ...to  Sta.  ... 
Sta.  ..  .to  Sta.  ... 

Shaping: 

Surface  course 

Road  surface 

completed  . . 
Material 

sq.  vds. 

Quarry: 

Sta.   ...to  Sta.  ... 

Teams 

Crusher: 

Men 

Hauling   surfacing  mate- 
rial : 

Materials  used,  paid  for  by  unit  measure. 

Quantity. 

Price. 

Total. 

Surfacing  ma- 

Loading  surfacing  mate- 

Spreading  surfacing  mate- 

Fuel     for 

Fuel  for  roller. 
Oil,  waste,  re- 

Drain    pipe, 

Total 

Remarks: 


In  every  ease  samples  of  all  available  road  materials  are  secured  by 

the  inspecting  engineer  and  sent  to  the  laboratory  of  the  Office  for 

analysis  and  comparative  tests.     Such  tests  are  made  free  of  charge  to 

citizens  of  the  United  States,  and  proper  instructions  for  shipping  the 

mples  are  furnished  upon  request,  with  details  as  follows: 

(1)  All  samples  should  be  selected  to  represent  as  nearly  as  possible  an  average  of  the 
rial. 

(2)  A  sample  of  rock  for  laboratory  tests  must  consist  of  stones  which  will  pass 
through  a  3-inch  but  not  through  a  li-inch  ring — excepting  one  piece,  which  should 
measure  approximately  4  by  6  inches  on  one  face,  and  be  about  3  inches  thick.  The 
whole  sample  should  weigh  not  less  than  30  pounds.  It  is  desired  thai  samples  of  rock 
be  shipped  in  burlap  bags. 


OBJECT-LESSOX    ROADS.  141 

(3)  A  sample  of  gravel  must  weigh  not  less  than  25  pounds,  and  should  not  contain 
stones  over  1  inch  in  diameter.  Such  samples  must  be  shipped  in  boxes,  sufficiently 
tight  to  prevent  the  liner  material  from  sifting  out. 

(4  >  A  sample  of  paving  brick  must  contain  36  whole  bricks,  or  24  blocks,  which  must 
curely  packed  in  a  box  for  shipment. 

(5)  A  blank  form  and  addressed  tag  envelope  will  be  supplied  by  the  Office  for  each 
sample.  The  blank  form  must  be  filled  and  placed  in  the  tag  envelope,  which  must  be 
used  as  the  address  for  tin-  sample.  It  is  essential  that  the  blank  forms  be  filled  with 
the  utmost  care,  as  they  are  filed  as  records  of  the  samples. 

(G)  The  Office  desires  to  keep  a  record  of  the  actual  wear  on  roads  built  <  >f  the  mate- 
rial- tested.  If  the  material  which  this  sample  represents  has  been  or  is  about  to  be 
used  on  roads,  this  Office  desires  to  be  informed  of  the  addresses  of  those  in  charge  of 
the  construction  and  maintenance  of  such  roads. 

The  engineer,  when  making  his  preliminary  investigation,  gives  due 
consideration  to  transportation  facilities,  railroad  rates,  and  nearest 
material  within  shipping  distance,  in  case  local  materials  are  unsuita- 
ble, inaccessible,  or  available  only  at  prohibitive  cost. 

The  cooperation  in  object-lesson  road  work  is  entirely  free,  and  the 
local  authorities  are  not  required  to  pay  any  portion  of  the  salary  or 
expenses  of  the  Government  engineers  or  experts,  or  for  freight  or 
repair  of  machinery  owned  by  the  Government. 

The  construction  crew  consists  of  one  expert  foreman  and  one  expert 
roller  and  machinery  operator.  Heavy-  machinery  requiring  the  direc- 
tion of  an  expert  operator  is  unnecessary,  except  in  the  construction  of 
macadam  roads,  and  it  frequently  is  the  case  that  only  an  expert  fore- 
man is  assigned  to  the  work.  Engineering  assistance  is  given  from 
time  to  time  as  the  case  requires,  the  work  being  under  the  general 
direction  of  the  chief  engineer  or  the  assistant  engineer,  one  of  whom  is 
present  at  some  stage  in  the  construction  of  each  road. 

The  extent  of  the  machinery  equipment  is  governed  by  the  require- 
ments in  each  case,  the  outfit  for  a  macadam  road  usually  consisting  of 
wheel  and  drag  scrapers,  plows,  road  machine,  crushing  plant,  distrib- 
uting and  dumping  wagons,  sprinkler,  and  roller.  (See  PI.  IV,  figs. 
1  and  2.)  A  modern  crushing  plant  consists  of  crusher,  elevator,  re- 
volving screens,  and  bins  for  at  least  three  sizes  of  crushed  stone.  The 
capacity  of  the  average  portable  crusher  is  from  60  to  100  cubic  yards 
per  day.  A  gravel  road  usually  requires  the  same  machinery,  except 
the  crushing  plant,  while  sand-clay  roads  may  be  easily  constructed 
with  a  plow,  road  machine,  and  horse  roller,  though  if  excavation  is 
required,  wheel  and  drag  scrapers  maybe  necessary. 

The  horse  rollers  generally  used  by  this  Office  are  from  3  to  4  tons  in 
weight.  Ten-ton  steam  rollers  have  been  used  on  most  of  the  object- 
lesson  roads,  although  7^-ton  rollers  were  used  in  a  few  cases. 

The  assistance  given  by  the  Government  in  object-lesson  road  build- 
ing is  not  designed  to  extend  beyond  the  educational  stage,  and  it  is, 
therefore,  usually  confined  to  such  length  of  time  as  is  necessary  to 
instruct  properly  the  local  road  foreman,  who  is  expected  to  continue 
the  construction  begun  by  the  Government  engineers.     Xo  definite 


142  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

length  of  road  is  guaranteed  to  be  built,  but  it  may  be  said  that  it 
rarely  exceeds  a  mile,  and  is  usually  less  than  that  distance. 

It  may  be  well  to  state  that  owing  to  the  immense  number  of  appli- 
cations for  object-lesson  roads  it  is  never  possible  to  comply  with  ail 
requests,  and  the  practice  is  therefore  followed  of  apportioning  assist- 
to  those  sections  of  the  country  which  have  previously  received 
the  smallest  percentage,  or  which  stand  in  greatest  need  of  this  kind  of 
instruction.  Requests  receive  due  consideration  in  order  of  priority, 
so  far  as  vhe  location  of  the  construction  outfits  will  permit. 

PURPOSES    OF    OBJECT-LES-OX    ROAD    WORK. 

Briefly  stated,  the  purposes  of  object-lesson  roads  are,  first,  to  intro- 
duce among  local  road  builders  correct  methods  of  construction  and 
maintenance;  second,  to  demonstrate  the  advantages  of  a  properly 
built  road  in  order  to  stimulate  public  sentiment  for  road  improve- 
ment and  arouse  a  spirit  of  progress:  third,  to  afford  a  basis  for  esti- 
mating cost  of  additional  road  construction,  which  may  be  subse- 
quently carried  on  by  the  county  or  community:  fourth,  to  demon- 
strate the  availability  and  relative  value  of  local  materials  as  far  as 
practicable;  or,  where  no  local  material  exists,  to  determine  whether 
materials  can  be  shipped  in  by  rail  so  as  to  make  the  construction  of 
hard  roads  feasible  at  moderate  cost. 

The  most  important  effect  of  the  object-lesson  road  is  the  consequent 
improvement  in  methods  of  construction.  The  widespread  igno- 
rance of  the  elementary  principles  of  road  construction  has  already 
been  mentioned.  It  is  fortunately  true,  however,  that  these  princi- 
ples are  not  intricate  nor  difficult  to  learn,  and  a  small  amount  of 
instruction  properly  directed  in  each  community  will  go  far  toward 
promoting  a  general  improvement  of  the  public  roads.  This  instruc- 
tion can  not  be  given  theoretically  with  entire  success,  for  actual  expe- 
rience i-  essential  to  the  acquirement  of  a  working  knowledge  of  the 
subject.  Practical  instruction  is  easily  understood  and  the  knowledge 
"ained;  furthermore,  it  is  an  unanswerable  reply  to  incorrect  the- 
ories often  firmly  fixed  in  the  minds  of  the  ultraconservative  element 
of  a  eomnnmity. 

Another  advantage  which  frequently  accrues  to  localities  through 
this  medium  is  the  substitution  of  less  costly  methods  of  construction 
for  those  already  in  use.  In  1905  the  construction  of  a  short  section 
of  sand-clay  road,  near  Troy.  Ala.,  established  the  wisdom  of  provid- 
ing s  -  id-clay  roads  supplemented  by  macadam  only  on 
heavily  traveled  thoroughfares.  At  the  time  of  the  construction  of 
the  sand-clay  road  the  county  was  almost  on  the  point  of  issuing 
bonds  for  a  large  amount  to  construct  macadam  roads  exclusively. 
The  result  has  been  the  saving  of  a  large  sum  of  money,  with  no 
material  curtailment  of  transportation  facilities. 

Nearly  all  innovations,  whether  labor-saving  inventions,  scientific 
discoveries,  or  economic  achievements,  have  met   at   their  inception 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  IV. 


Fig.  1.— First  Object-lesson  Roads  Built  by  the  Office  of  Public  Roads, 
Atlanta,  Ga.,  1895. 


Fig.  2. -Tarring  Road  at  Jackson,  Tenn.-Latest  Advance  in  Road  Surfacing. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  V. 


Fig.    1. — Before  Improvement. 


. — Sjbgrade  Ready  for   Macadamizing. 


Fig.    3.  — Fp.Smed   Maca;av    Road. 

The  Evolution  of  a  Country  Road,  Uniontown,  Ala. 


OBJECT-LESSON    EOADS.  143 

with  determined  and  bitter  opposition  from  the  majority.  It  is  the 
energetic,  progressive  minority  to  whom  we  must  look  for  material  as 
well  as  intellectual  progress,  and  so  it  is  in  many  communities  with 
regard  to  road  improvement,  where  the  narrow  conservatism  of  the 
majority  may  stand  as  an  obstacle  to  the  inauguration  of  any, well- 
defined  and  comprehensive  scheme  looking  toward  the  betterment  of 
the  roads.  The  cooperation  of  the  local  authorities  in  the  construction 
of  an  object-lesson  road  is  frequently  accepted  as  a  compromise  measure 
and  serves  as  a  sort  of  test  case  to  determine  whether  a  progressive  or  a 
passive  policy  shall  prevail  in  the  community.  The  road  thus  serves 
as  the  entering  wedge  in  the  establishment  of  a  system  of  improved 
highways  and  the  consequent  development  and  advancement  of  the 
material  prosperity  of  the  country. 

While  the  cost  of  roads  varies  widely,  owing  to  the  variation  of  the 
factors  entering  into  road  construction,  such  as  the  amount  of  excava- 
tion, cost  of  material,  depth  and  width  of  material,  and  wages  of 
laborers,  it  is  possible  to  approximate  the  cost  of  additional  road 
building  in  a  section  of  country  where  an  object-lesson  road  has  been 
built  by  applying  the  unit-cost  data  of  the  completed  road  to  the 
known  conditions.  For  instance,  while  it  would  not  be  safe  to  say 
that  because  an  object-lesson  road  was  built  at  a  cost  of  $4,000  per 
mile  the  average  cost  for  additional  construction  should  be  $4,000, 
it  would  be  practicable  to  arrive  at  the  total  approximate  cost  by 
comparing  each  unit  of  cost  and  allowing  for  differences  known  to  exist. 

In  some  cases  satisfactory  roads  are  being  constructed  at  a  great 
cost  not  justified  by  existing  conditions.  The  object-lesson  road  often 
serves  as  a  check  upon  this  kind  of  extravagance  or  dishonesty. 

In  some  localities  hard  roads  are  being  built  of  material  brought  in 
by  rail,  whereas  a  local  material  could  be  used  to  advantage  at  lower 
cost.  In  other  cases  no  effort  is  made  to  build  macadam  roads 
because  of  the  lack  of  a  suitable  material  in  the  immediate  locality. 
Macadam  roads  have  been  built  at  moderate  cost  of  material  hauled 
by  rail  distances  exceeding  100  miles.  In  still  other  cases  inferior 
materials  are  used  when  good  material  may  be  had  at  the  same  cost. 
The  object-lesson  road,  in  conjunction  with  the  testing  laboratory,  is 
designed  to  meet  these  conditions. 

Until  the  fiscal  year  1905,  the  Office  of  Public  Roads  was  unable 
to  perfect  a  system  whereby  complete  cost  data  and  record  of  con- 
struction could  be  obtained  and  placed  in  the  hands  of  local  road  offi- 
cials. Under  the  present  system  the  file  for  each  object-lesson  road 
contains  application,  inspection  report,  profile  and  cross  section,  esti- 
mate, machinery  report,  daily  reports  of  work,  final  report,  laboratory 
tests,  and  photographs  showing  various  stages  of  progress.  Dupli- 
cates of  these  records  are  available  for  the  use  of  the  authorities  having 
jurisdiction  over  the  road  improved. 


144  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMEXT    OF    AGEICITLTr/EE. 

EXTENT    OF    OBJECT-LESSON    ROAD    COXSTEt'CTIOX. 

The  first  object-  i  oads  were  constructed  on  the  grounds  of  the 

Bit  Atlanta,  Ga..  in  18 
instructed,  of  macadam,  sand,  and  earth,  respec- 
tive, j         -      \vn  in  Plate  V.  figure  1.     The  macadam  road  was  300  feet 
in  length,  in  -      &ch  of  different  grade,  the  first  being 

level,  and  th  -  -    aid  10  percent  grade,  respectively. 

I  and  earth  roads  were  each  200  feet  in  length,  divided  into 

•    -  nd  conforming  in  grades  to  the  macadam  road. 

-  .am  road  was  composed  of  Trenton  limestone 

brought  from  quarries  near  Chattanooga,  Tenn..  the  depth  of  material 

Inches  and  the  width  12  feet. 

o  with  experiment  stations  in  carrying  on  object-lesson 
work  in  conformance  with  the  provision  in  the  act  of  Congress 
_-  the  Office  of  Road  Inquiry  to  assist  agricultural  colleges  and 
riment  stations  was  first  undertaken  at  Geneva,  X.  Y.,  during  the 
fiscal  vear  1895-96.     It  was  found  at  the  beginning  of  the  work  that 
to  restrict  it    to  cooperation  with  experiment  stations  would   limit 
ilness  too  greatly,  and  since  1896  the  construction  of  object- 
n  roads  has  been  carried  on  throughout  the  entire  country  in 
dire-. '  n  with  local  officials.     Dtiring  the  fiscal  year  1896-97 

-1   >son  roads  were  constructed  at  New  Brunswick  and  Florence. 
X.  J.;  L  Y.:  Warren.  Pa.:  and  Kingston.  R.  I.     During  the 

foil.         _       ,.r  the  scope  of  the  work  was  broadened  materially.     Four- 
teen -     -re  built  that  year,  located  in  Maryland.  Ohio.  Minnesota. 
-    .    I     ...  Xebraska,  and  the  District  of  Columbia, 
all  be  noticed  that  at  first  this  object-les^m  work  was  confined 
rn  States,  but  during  the  year  1-    "         most  of  the  work 
s  done  in  the  Middle  West. 

During  the  fiscal  y«  u   1  -   9-1900  there  was  a  marked  curtailment 
in  th  I  -lesson  road  work,  only  5  roads  having  been  constructed 

Since  1900  this  branch  of  the  work  has  had 
nior  14  roads  having  been  constructed  in  1901,  15  in  1902, 

1,  3  in  1904.  19  in  1905,  and  17  in  1906. 

rger  appropriation  and  increased  facilities,  it  is  expected 

a  greater  number  of  object-lesson  roads  will  be  completed  during 

7      han  in    any  previo1  ^ince  the  Office  was 

..ready  roads  have  been  completed  at  Seattle,  Wash.; 

nd  Pendleton.  Oreg.:  Bozeman.  Mont.:  Benton.  La.:  Dyers- 

..     V...:  Chevy  Chase.  Md..   and  Washington. 

ads  are  under  construction  at  Oswego.  Kans.:  Xew 

Orleans.  La.:  Paintsville.  Ivy.:  Lenoir  City.  Tenn..  and  Williamsburg 

and  >  Va. 

In   ail.  113   object-lesson   roads   have   been   constructed   since   the 

beg  a  -  .<.  distributed  in  32  States,  as  follows:   12  in  Ohio; 

th  Carolina  :  7  in  Florida.  South  Carolina,  and  Virginia,  respec- 

in  Alabama:  5  each  in  Missouri  and  Tennessee;  4  each  in 


OBJECT-LESSON    EOADS. 


145 


Georgia,  Kentucky,  Louisiana,  Maryland,  and  Pennsylvania;  3  in 
Arkansas,  Michigan,  New  York,  and  Washington,  respectively;  2  in 
the  District  of  Columbia,  Illinois,  Kansas,  Minnesota,  Mississippi, 
Nebraska,  New  Jersey,  North  Dakota,  and  Texas,  respectively;  and  1 
each  in  Iowa,  Oregon,  Rhode  Island,  Vermont,  West  Virginia,  and 
Wisconsin. 

Local  materials  were  used  in  the  construction  of  these  roads  where- 
ever  it  was  possible.  Limestone  was  the  principal  material,  though 
various  grades  of  granite  and  trap  rock  were  used  in  mamr  places. 
The  number  of  roads  built  of  each  particular  variety  of  material  was 
as  follows:  Limestone,  30;  granite,  21;  gravel,  12;  trap  and  basalt, 
9;  sand  clay,  9;  chert,  9;  shells,  3;  novaculite,  4;  steel  track,  4; 
gneiss,  3;  earth,  2;  brick,  2;  slag,  1;  burnt  clay,  1;  hornblende- 
schist,  1;  marl,  1;  and  oil,  1. 

The  following  table  gives  in  brief  form  all  of  the  essential  details 

relating  to  the  dimensions  and  cost  of  the  object-lesson  roads  built  in 

1904-5: 

Data  in  relation  to  object-lesson  roaels  constructed  in  1904-5. 


Place. 


Fcrnandina,  Fla 

Pensacola,  Fla 

Jacksonville,  Fla 

Neosho   Mo 

Beaumont,  Tex 

Tallahassee,  Fla 

Pensacola ,  Fla 

Gainesville,  Fla 

Shreveport,  La 

Walla  Walla,  Wash.. 
Beliingham,  Wash... 

De  Kail),  111 

Gainesville,  Fla 

Spr'mgr.eld,  Mo 

Arkansas  City,  Kans 
Chagrin  Falls,  Ohio.. 

Columbus,  Ohio 

Lebanon,  Mo 

Ciarksdale,  Miss 


Materials  used. 


Kind. 


Shells 

Granite  and  trap 

Marl 

Novaculite 

Clara  shelis 

Sand -clay 

Sand -clay 

Flint 

G  ravel 

Tiap 

Granite 

Limestone 

Sand -clay 

Novaculite 

Limestone 

Sandstone  and 
granite. 

Bricks  and  gran- 
ite. 

Novaculite 

Burnt  clay 


Source  and  trans- 
portation. 


Local 

Ballast  from  Ger- 
many. 
By  rail  2.30  miles.. 

Local 

By  boat  28  miles.. 

Local 

Local 

By  wagon  6  miles. 
By  rail  32  miles.. . 
By  rail  13  miles... 
By  rail  30  miles... 
By  rail  100  miles.. 

Local 

By  wagon  2.}  miles 

Local 

Local 

Local 

Local 

On  road 


Dimensions 
of  road. 


Cost. 


Ft. 

1, 199 

50G 

5,280 
2, 640 
3,154 
4,480 
1,800 
265 
3,306 
2,048 
2,050 
4,510 
5,280 
1,310 
3,615 
2,400 

S35 

2,950 
300 


Per 

square 
yard. 


so.. us 

.42<J 

.592 
.  434 
1.019 
.055 
.140 
.278 
.334 
.415 
.78.5 
.985 
.107 
.335 
.396 
.800 


Rate  per 
mile. 


S4,899.S4    SI.  00 
8,0.53.70     1.2.5 


5,211.03 

a  3, 055. 36 

6  9,565.01 

516. 27 

c  1,232. 00 

11,416.53 

3,  135. 15 

4,382.40 

6, 908. 00 

6, 934.  40 

881.25 

3, 144. 53 

3, 252.  48 

4,693.33 


.976  ^10,306.56 

.335     «1,76S.S0 
.210    / 1,478. 40 


1.2.5 
1.00 

1.00 

1.00 
1.00 
1.50 
2.00 
1.75 
1.00 
1.00 
1.50 
1.50 


1.00 
1.25 


a  Includes  S40S.25  for  culverts. 

6  City  and  county  prisoners  used  for  labor.     Cost  was  for  material  only,  at  S2.15  per  cubic  yard. 
c  Convict  labor  used. 

<i  Bricks  from  burned  buildings  were  crushed  and  rolled  for  foundation;  bowlders  from  fields  were 
crushed  and  used  for  surfacing. 
«  Novaculite  from  fields  was  used. 
/  This  was  an  experimental  road. 

3    a  1906 10 


146  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Iii  view  of  the  fact  that  the  width  of  the  roads  built  durin_ 
varied  from  9  to  70  feet,  it  will  be  interesting  to  compare  the 
mated   average   cost   of  each  kind   of  road   constructed,   per  square 
yard,  and  also  per  mile,  for  a  roadway  12  feet  wide.     This  info: 
tion  is  shown  in  the  following  table: 


Kind 


-■ 
- 


Granite 

I 



Marl 

Trap  reek 

■ 

Gravel 

Flint  r 
Burnt 

y 


4 

"    i 

i   - 

_ 

i 

. 

! 

■ 

■   2 

• 

1 

" 

.     . 

i 

1 

1 

_" 

'"     . 

.. 

;  - 

- 

It  will  be  seen  that  the  avera_  rent  kirn"  - 

roads  in  1904-5  was  44  cents  per  square  yard,  and  that  the  avei 
rate  per  mile  for  a  12-foot  roadway 

The   maximum   cost    of   macadam  roads   constructed   during   the 
fiscal  year   1905-0  was  $1.42   per  square  yard,  the  average  67  cents, 
and  the  minimum  24  cents.      vSee  table  on  p.  147.)      The  clam  and 
oyster  shell  roads  cost  39  cents  per  square  yard,  an  I 
chert    roads,   11    tents.     The    average    cost    of   the    - 

4 \  cents  per  square  yard.     It  will  be  noticed  tha  ..iximum 

and  the  aver:.        -  ..dam  roads  during  -  mewhat 

higher  than  in  1904-5.     This  is  due  to  the  fact  that  the  i    si 
and  had   advanced   during  the  year   1905-6  and   tha 

unfavorable    conditions   were   encountered   during  :.r.     The 

average  depth  of  material  in  the  roads  built  during  the  ; 
was  about  7  inches.     The  average  widti  acadam  \ 

and  the  average  rate  per  mile  for  the  macadam  roads  cons 
2 

If    all    the    roads    constructed    in  1905-6    had    been    only  12    I 
wide,  then  the  rate  per  mile  for  the  macadam  roads,  at  tl 
rate  of  67  cents  per  square  yard,  would  have  been  $4,716.80;  the 

of  the  oyster-shell  road,  at  39  cents  per  square  yard 
been  5.60;  the  cost  of   gravel  and  che:  -  per 

square  yard,  would  have  been  about  $774.40  per  mile    and  the 
of  sand-clay  roads,  at  the  rate  of  4_  per  square  yard,  would 

have  been  $217  per  mile. 


OBJECT-LESSON    ROADS. 


147 


Data  in  relation  to  object-lesson  roads  constructed  in  : 


Materials  used. 


Dimensions  of  road. 


Place. 


Kind. 


Miles 

from        Length.     Width.    Depth.       -"fa 
source. 


A  re  a 


Texarkana,  Ark.  . . 


Uniontown,  Ala . . 


Coshocton.  Ohio Gravel,  sand, and  limestone. . 

Auburn,  Xel;r Limestone 

Columbia,  Mo Limestone 

Macon.  Mo Limestone 

Pullman.  Wash Basalt 

[Chert 

l<:  ravel 

San  Antonio.  Tex Limestone 

Lafayette.  La Clam  and  oyster  shells 

Snow  Hill,  Ala Limestone 

[Limestone 

(Chert  and  slag 

Abbeville.  S.  C G  ravel  and  chert 

Union,  S.  C G  ranite 

Kenansville,  S.  C Sand-clay 

Kinston.  X.  C Sand-clay 

New!  ern.  X.  C Sand-day 

Washington,  X.  C Sand-clay 

Mount  Weather,  Va  . . .    Hornblende-schist 


Inches.    Sq.  yd.*. 
10 


6,623 

2,081 

4.445 

4,478 

982 

5,  928 

4.47;; 
G,  893 
13,111 
1,066.6 
1,066.G 
'  - 
4,783 


Cost. 


Place. 


Total  cost. 


square 
yard. 


Pate  per 
mile. 


Cost  of 

labor  and  teams 

per  day. 


Coshocton.  Ohio i  S2. 820. 29 

Auburn,  Nebr 9,416.07 

Columbia.  Mo 5,1 194,  28 

Macon,  Mo 3. 220. 16 

Pullman,  Wash 2, 438. 50 

Texarkana.  Ark 2,968.99 

San  Antonio.  Tex 4,393. 57 

Lafayette,  La 

Snow  Mill.  Ala 2, 465. 53 

Uniontown,  Ala 2.i;.77.  06 

Abbeville,  S.  C 496.00 

S.  C 1,671.42 

Kenansville.  S.  C 440. 35 

Kinston,  X.  C 31.45 

Newbern,  X.  C 28. 86 

igton,  X.  C 375. 50 

Mount  Weather,  Va '-2. 620.  Si 


SO.  48 

1.  12 
.54 
.561 

1.17 
.  668 
.981 
.39 
.41 


.11 

.  242 

.033 

.03 

.027 

.09 


$2,534.00 

to  4.  221.  15 

"12,  4%.  00 

5, 120. 44 

4, 607. 67 

9,600.00 

4,702.02 

<-  15,711.70 

3, 200. 00 

2,886.40 

f         2,460.00 

I    to  2.  - 

1,419.73 
5,  404.  37 
387.  IS 
276. 02 
190.00 
739. 13 


M  n. 


81.60 

1.50 

1.50 
1.50 
2.  50 
1.50 
1.50 
1.25 


L.OO 

-- 


Teams. 

- 

3.00 
3.00 

4.50 

■ 
3.O0 
3.  CO 

2.  25 

- 
2.50 


1.00 


- 


o  Including  curb  10  inches  wide  and  12  inches  deep,  built  to  protect  road  from  floods. 

b  Cost  more  than  usual,  on  account  of  curb,  extra  depth  of  material,  and  other  extras.     Road  entirely 
submerged  by  floods  for  seven  days  during  construction. 

t  A  great  deal  of  tain  and  very  hot  weather  prevailed,  which  made  it  expensive  to  prepare  the  subgradc 
of  "  black  gumbo  '*  soil.    This  work  was  located  on  a  city  street,  but  the  cost  ol  curbs  together  with  ti  e 
of  lowering  water  and  gas  mains  and  making  sewer  connections,  has  been  omitted,  so  th 
red  with  the  cost  of  country  roads. 

d  Convict  labor  use  I;  price  paid  for  subsistence  was  $0.30  per  day. 

<  Trad  on  engine  use  1  for  hauling  surfacing  material;  cost  per  day.  $5.50. 

/  Traction  engine  used  for  hauling  stone:  cost  per  da] 

0  Twenty-three  convicts  were  employed  on  this  work,  at  $0.75  per  day. 

h  Cost  of  curbs,  catch-basins,  and  brick-paved  gutters  has  been  omitted,  in  order  that  the  cost  may 
be  compared  with  that  of  countrv  roads. 


148  YEARBOOK    •  DEPARTMENT  RICULTD 

The  foregoing  data  relating  to  cost  of  object-lesson  roads  do  not 
include  the  expense  incurred  by  this  Office,  which  is  approximately 
10  per  cent  of  the  total  cost.  It  must  not  be  supposed,  however,  that 
the  same  kinds  of  roads  as  those  which  have  been  built  under  the 
direction  of  this  Office  can  aiwaj  -meted  in  any  locality 

the  same  rate,  but  it  is  safe  that  where  the  same  conditions 

prevail  as  to  the  cost  of  labor,  mater:  the  rate  should  be  prac- 

ime.  or  less  if  the  work  is  done  on  a  large  scale. 

RESULT  - 

It  is  interesting  to  observe  that  progress  in  road  building  has 
usually  followed  the  construction  of  object-lesson  roads. 

This  has  been  demonstrated  beyond  doubt  in  a  number  of  a 
among  which  may  be  mentioned  the  following 

Kxoxville.  Texx. — In  1S99  an  ol  -  >n  road  was  constructed 

at   this  place  which  occasioned  much  no!      illy  in   Knox 

County,  but  in  adjoining  counties.     The  -  of  Bradley  County, 

after  a  careful  inspection  of  the  road  at  Knoxville.  started  a  m 
men:   I      issue  bonds  to  the  amount  of  -  for  the  purpose  of 

carrying  on  similar  work  in  Bra<:  nty.     After  much  opposition 

the  plan  was  put  into  effect.     The  improvement  in  the 

roads  was  of  such  general  benefit  that  additional  bonds  were  issued, 
bringing  the  total  issue         ->■  These  bonds  met  so  great  a 

demand  that    -_  a   realized  from  their  sale.     Lands  that 

were  worth  from  $8  to  $10  per  acre  before  road  improvement  now 
find  ready  sale  at  from  SI 5  to  $30  per  acre. 

Madis  :ty.   Texx. — This   county  has   expended   $150,000 

and  is  preparir._  :r>end  an  equal   additional  amount   on  road 

building,  following  thee  on  of  an  object-lesson  road  in  1901. 

Madison  County  has  now  ov  es  of  high-class  macadam  roads. 

Pr  ..  Fla. — The  following  is  a  report  on  the  object-lest 

Since  its  construction  the  work  of  building!  with. 

good  results,  and  now  the  city  in  th 
street  improvements,  and  this  sum,  to..- 

holders  under  our  law  of  apportionment  -  pended  for 

this  purr> 

Gainesville.  Fla. — The  following  is  a  report  on  the  object-lesson 
road  built  in  19 

We  immediai  -  >:d  in  machinery,  the  du]  and 

have  constructed  as  nearly  as  possible  lil  2  1  are 

following  sewer  construction  on  ot":.  — n. 

I  feel  confident  that  your  object  lesson  h<  the 

community.     We  had  an  abundance  of  raw  material  f  Low  to 

use  it. 

Directly  traceable  to  your  work  here  is  con?  iderable 
of  Jacksonville,  Fla.,  as  well  as  Lai: 
to  examine  your  work,  and  are  proceed:  same  material. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dep:         -  e    1 906. 


Plate  VI. 


Fig.    1. — Method  of  Construction.  Showing  Curb  to  Prevent  Washing. 


Fi3.   2.— Road  Under  Wate^ 


KM 

Bbkv 

Fig.   3. — Completed  Road. 

Macadam  Road  at  Auburn.  Nebr.,  Built  Through  River  Bottom. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,   1906. 


Plate  VII. 


Fig.  1.— Crushing  Plant,  Walla  Walla,  Wash. 


Fig.  2.— Preparing  set  Grade  for  Macadam  Road  with  Traction  Engine  and 
Road  Machine,  Arkansas  City,  Kans. 


Fig.  3.— Concrete  Bridge,  Texarkana,  Ark. 


OBJECT-LESSON    BOADS.  149 

Uniontown,  Ala. — An  official  of  this  place  reports  as  follows  upon 
the  object-lesson  road  completed  in  1906.  Plate  VI  shows  the  various 
stages  in  the  construction  of  this  macadam  road. 

a  result  of  the  work  done  here  by  your  Department,  the  city  is  now  expending 
¥25,000  on  the  streets. 

The  whole  county  is  alive  with  good-roads  ideas.  The  county  commissioners  will 
take  the  matter  in  hand  as  to  the  advisability  of  making  road  districts  and  issuing 
bonds  to  improve  the  roads.  All  of  this  comes  directly  from  the  object-lesson  road 
built  by  your  Office  1  mile  north  from  city  limits. 

Auburn,  Xebr. — The  following  is  quoted  from  a  letter  concerning 
the  road  built  in  1906: 

There  has  been  an  additional  mile  of  road  improved  as  a  result  of  the  object-I     - 
work  done  at  this  place,  and  the  Auburn  Commercial  Club,  working  in  conjunction 
with  the  board  of  county  commissioners,  expect  to  go  right  on  with  the  good  work 
until  every  public  highway  leading  out  of  this  city  has  been  put  in  first-class  condition. 

The  splendid  effect  following  the  object-lesson  road  work  at  this  place  is  so  exten- 
sive that  adjoining  counties  arc  sending  representatives  here  to  inspect  the  work  and 
I  i  familiarize  themselves  with  the  construction  of  the  road. 

It  is  generally  conceded  that  we  now  have  the  finest  and  most  durable  - 
good  roads  in  the  State  of  Nebraska. 

Plate  VII  illustrates  the  peculiar  conditions  met  in  the  construction 
of  the  object-lesson  road  at  this  place. 

IMPROVEMENT    OF    RTJB  VL    MAIL    ROUTES. 

In  order  to  promote  the  efficiency  of  the  rural-delivery  service  and 
at  the  same  time  render  effective  aid  in  the  improvement  of  roads 
throughout  the  United  States,  the  following  plan  of  cooperation  has 
been  arranged  between  the  Post-Office  Department,  through  the 
office  of  the  Fourth  Assistant  Postmaster-General,  and  the  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture,  through  the  Office  of  Public  Roads.  This  plan 
of  cooperation  was  approved  by  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture  July  3, 
1906.  and  the  Postmaster-General  July  10,  1906. 

Whenever  a  road  upon  which  a  rural  route  has  been  or  is  about  to 
be  established  is  reported  by  the  carrier  or  inspector  to  be  impassable 
or  in  bad  repair,  the  Fourth  Assistant  Postmaster-General  will  advise 
the  Director  of  the  Office  of  Public  Roads  of  the  fact  and  request 
that  he  have  an  engineer  inspector  detailed  to  examine  the  road  and 
give  such  advice  and  instruction  to  the  local  officials  as  may  be 
required. 

Upon  receipt  of  such  information  from  the  Fourth  Assistant  Post- 
master-General, the  Director  of  this  Office  will  communicate  with  the 
local  officials  and  supply  them  with  a  circular  of  instructions  and  a 
blank  form  for  making  application  for  the  detail  of  such  engineer 
inspector. 

It  is  not  the  purpose  of  this  Office  actually  to  construct  the  road  or 
to  make  any  contribution  either  in  money,  materials,  or  labor.     In 


150  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTLIEXI    OP    AGRICULTURE. 

"  cases  a  road  is  impassable  on  account  of  defects  which  can  be 
remedied  by  the  use  of  proper  methods.  The  engineer  inspector  who 
examines  the  road  will  note  carefully  all  such  defects  and  advise  as  to 
what  bteps.  can  be  taken  to  place  the  road  in  proper  condition  without 
great  expense.  If  practicable,  and  if  so  desired,  he  may  in  some  cases 
assume  temporary  direction  of  the  work  for  the  purpose  of  instruction. 
There  will  be  no  expense  to  the  community  on  account  of  the 
detail  of  such  engineer,  as  his  salary  and  expenses  are  paid  by  the 
Federal  Government. 

LECTURES    OX    OBJECT-LESSON    METHODS. 

ie  present  plan  of  confining  the  object-lesson  road  work  to  practi- 
cal instruction  will  probably  be  improved  in  the  near  future  and  the- 
oretical instruction  by  means  of  lectures  will  be  given  in  conjunction 
with  instruction  by  the  object-lesson  method.     A  lecture  may  of 
itself  be  entirely  inadequate  to  impart  a  working  knowledge  of  road 
struction;  and  on  the  other  hand  it  is  probable  that  instruction 
by  the  object-lesson  method  alone  will  fail  to  convey  a  sufficient 
st  difficult  points  in  connection  with  road  build- 
ing.    The  theoretical  portion  of  the  instruction  will  probably  cod 
of  one  or  more  lectures  during  the  continuance  of  the  work,  in  which 
subjects  of  primary  importance  will  be  discussed,  such  as  grading, 
drainage,   selection   and    preparation  of    materials,   maintenance   of 
roads,  operation  and  repair  of  machinery,  organization,  methods  of 
ration,  and  computation  of  cost  data.     These  lectures,  while 
intended  particularly  for  road  overseers,  road  foremen,  and  all  offi- 
having  connection  with  road  building,  are  open  to  the  general 
public  and  occasion  will  be  given  for  a  general  discussion  of  w 
means,  methods,  and  practice,  in  addition  to  the  subjects  of  the  lec- 
ture.    The  or^aiiizatk-n  and  practice  governing  teachers"  and  farmers' 
tutes  will  to  some  extent  be  applied  to  these  road  institutes.     It 
is  expected  that  the  authorities  having  jurisdiction  over  the  road 
under  construction  -will  lend  their  cooperation  in  securing  the  pres- 
ence of  the  persons  to  whom  this  instruction  should  be  given.     In 
som<  the  county  court,  county  commissioners,  or  county  super- 

.ve  authority  to  direct  the  various  road  ove:  partici- 

pate in  the  construction  of  the  object-lesson  read  and  in  the  road 
*ute  held  in  connection  with  the  work:  in  othe:  they  can 

2je  the  presence  of  the  overseers.     It  will  of  course  be  n< 

be  made  to  correspond  with  local  conditions 
in  each  ci 

By  this  means  it  is  hoped  that  the  influen ce  !  h  road  institute 
and  object-lesson  road  will  extend  far  beyond  the  immediate  neigh- 
borhood and  result  in  a  more  widely  extended  improvement  in  the 
public  roads  than  would  be  possible  by  following  the  present  plan. 


INTRODUCTION  OF  ELEMENTARY  AGRICULTURE  INTO 

SCHOOLS. 

By  A.  C.  Tbue, 

Director  of  the  Office  of  Experiment  Stations. 

The  teaching  of  improved  methods  of  agriculture  to  the  masses  of 
our  agricultural  youth  has  recently  been  advocated  by  the  President 
of  the  United  States,  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture,  a  former  United 
States  Commissioner  of  Labor  who  is  now  the  president  of  a  Massa- 
chusetts college,  the  president  of  one  of  our  greatest  railroads,  the 
president  of  the  University  of  Virginia,  the  superintendent  of  schools 
of  New  York  City,  acting  as  president  of  the  National  Educational 
Association,  and  by  such  bodies  as  the  National  Educational  Associa- 
tion, the  National  Grange,  and  the  National  Irrigation  Congress. 
This  mav  fairly  be  taken  as  a  sure  indication  that  the  discussion  of  this 
subject  has  become  very  widespread,  and  that  public  opinion  is  becom- 
ing crystallized  in  favor  of  using  the  schools  for  the  dissemination  of 
agricultural  knowledge.  After  a  long  period  of  comparative  neglect 
of  agricultural  interests  by  the  leaders  of  thought  and  action  in  this 
country,  a  great  awakening  to  the  tremendous  issues  which  are 
involved  in  the  permanent  prosperity  of  our  agriculture  and  in  the 
maintenance  of  a  high  level  of  intelligence  among  our  agricultural 
people  has  come,  and  happily  the  minds  of  our  most  influential  men 
are  turning  more  and  more  to  the  public  schools  as  the  fittest  and  best 
centers  from  which  to  spread  a  knowledge  of  the  principles  of  agricul- 
ture and  in  which  to  inculcate  a  love  of  country  life  and  an  apprecia- 
tion of  the  dignity  of  agricultural  pursuits.  Sentiments  favorable  to 
agriculture  are  no  longer  expressed  by  our  public  men  simply  as  a 
compliment  to  our  farmers.  It  is  rather  a  new  and  serious  sense  of 
the  real  importance  of  the  farmer  to  the  commonwealth,  and  a  fear  of 
the  perils  into  which  the  crowding  of  our  population  in  great  cities  and 
the  neglect  to  maintain  the  fertility  of  our  soil  are  sure  to  bring  us, 
that  are  leading  thoughtful  men  of  all  classes  to  pay  earnest  attention 
to  the  educational  needs  of  our  rural  population.  This  means  a  great 
step  in  advance  on  this  subject.  It  is  now  possible  to  secure  a  fair 
hearing  of  the  claims  of  agriculture  to  a  place  in  our  public  schools  and 
a  thorough  testing  of  plans  for  the  teaching  of  this  subject  in  a  wide 
and  effective  way.  It  becomes  important,  therefore,  to  look  more 
closely   at    the   methods   which   are   being  pursued   to   acquaint    our 

151 


152  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

fanners,  educators,  and  legislators  with  the  needs  of  the  rural  schools 
in  different  parts  of  our  country  and  to  make  definite  suggestions  for 
then  improvement. 

Under  the  authority  of  Congress  and  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture 
the  Office  of  Experiment  Stations  has  been  collating  information  from 
various  sources  regarding  the  progress  of  this  movement,  and  the 
present  summary  is  presented  to  show  in  brief  the  results  of  this 
investigation. 

INTEREST    AMONG    FARMERS-    ORGANIZATIONS. 

Our  investigation  shows  that  in  the  farmers'  organizations  through- 
out  the  country,  which  as  a  rule  comprise  our  more  intelligent  and 
progressive  farmers,  the  introduction  of  agricultural  instruction  into 
the  schools  is  being  actively  discussed  and  warmly  approved.  Local 
organizations  are  passing  this  question  up  to  the  State  organizations, 
and  these  in  turn  are  sending  it  on  to  the  National  organizations. 
Committees  on  legislation  are  being  appointed,  and  there  are  many 
evidences  of  an  earnest  and -persistent  effort  to  secure  definite  results. 

Xot  content  to  wait  for  the  formulation  of  definite  courses  of 
instruction  in  agriculture  for  the  rural  schools  and  the  training  of 
teachers  in  this  subject,  there  is  in  many  places  an  effort  to  do  some- 
thing tangible  to  arouse  the  interest  of  farmers'  boys  in  the  study  of 
agriculture.  Through  the  agency  of  farmers'  organizations  cooperat- 
ing with  the  State  agricultural  colleges  and  State  and  county  depart- 
ments of  education,  boys'  agricultural  clubs  have  been  organized, 
largely  in  connection  with  the  schools,  in  Georgia,  Illinois.  Indiana. 
Iowa.  Kansas.  Nebraska,  Ohio,  Texas,  and  probably  other  States. 
The  members  of  these  clubs  have  regular  institute  meetings  and 
lecture  courses,  go  on  excursions  to  educational  institutions  and  large 
farms,  conduct  variety  tests  with  corn,  cotton,  sugar  beets,  and  other 
crops,  and  exhibit  then  products  at  school,  county,  and  State  fairs. 

The  agricultural  press  is  devoting  a  larger  space  than  ever  before  to 
the  discussion  of  educational  topics,  and  wherever  an  attempt  is  made 
t>.  establish  the  teaching  of  agriculture  in  the  schools  it  i.-.  widely  and 
fully  advertised.  Entire  numbers  of  some  papers  are  given  up  to  the 
presentation  of  various  phases  of  agricultural  education. 

ATTITUDE    OF    SCHOOL    OFFICERS    AND    TEACHERS. 

A  remarkable  change  has  taken  place  in  tiie  attitude  of  school  offi- 
cers and  teachers  regarding  nature  study  and  elementary  agriculture 
as  school  subjects.  A  few  years  ago  it  was  unusual  to  find  any  sub- 
ject relating  to  agriculture  in  public  schools  in  the  programmes  of 
teachers'  meetings.  Xow  scarcely  an  educational  meeting  of  impor- 
tance is  held  anywhere  in  the  United  States  without  at  least  one  paper 


ELEMENTARY   AGRICULTURE   IN   SCHOOLS.  153 

on  some  phase  of  this  subject,  and  in  many  cases  whole  sessions  are 
devoted  to  the  discussion  of  various  topics  relating  to  it,  from  nature 
study  and  school  gardening  to  the  more  formal  courses  in  agriculture. 
A  few  examples  will  serve  to  show  how  widespread  is  this  interest. 

At  the  sixty-seventh  annual  convention  of  the  American  Institute 
of  Instruction  at  New  Haven,  Conn.,  in  July,  1906,  which  is  largely 
attended  by  school  officers  and  teachers  from  different  parts  of  New 
England,  the  teaching  of  elementary  agriculture  was  largely  discussed 
in  the  department  of  rural  education,  formal  papers  on  this  subject 
being  presented  by  the  superintendent  of  education  of  Vermont  and 
the  professor  of  agriculture  of  the  Massachusetts  Agricultural  College. 

New  England  has  also  been  aroused  to  a  serious  and  thorough  dis- 
cussion of  this  matter  by  the  report  of  a  commission  on  industrial  and 
technical  education  presented  to  the  legislature  of  Massachusetts  in 
April,  1906.  The  chairman  of  this  commission  was  Hon.  Carroll  D. 
Wright,  for  many  years  United  States  Commissioner  of  Labor  and 
now  president  of  Clark  University  at  Worcester,  Mass.  This  com- 
mission was  appointed  by  the  governor  of  Massachusetts  in  accord- 
ance with  an  act  of  the  legislature,  -and  spent  nearly  a  year  in  a  study 
of  the  relation  of  children  to  our  industries  and  the  condition  of  indus- 
trial education  at  home  and  abroad.  The  commission  found  that 
"there  is  a  widespread  interest  in  the  general  subject  of  industrial 
education,  or  special  training  for  vocations,"  but  that  our  people  gen- 
erally, and  even  those  who  are  most  interested  in  the  subject,  have  no 
definite  ideas  as  to  its  proper  scope  or  method.  "Compared  with  the 
opportunities  afforded  in  Europe  for  acquiring  knowledge  and  skill  in 
productive  industry,  the  work  now  being  done  in  Massachusetts  is 
strikingly  and  painfully  inadequate,"  and  while  in  this  country  "the 
general  public  has  been  strangely  blind  to  the  narrowness  of  the  public 
school  education,"  in  Europe  there  is  "  the  universal  recognition  of  the 
necessity  of  special  education  for  every  form  of  industrial  life." 
Among  their  conclusions  were  the  following: 

The  State  needs  a  wider  diffusion  of  industrial  intelligence  as  a  foundation  for  the 
highest  technical  success,  and  this  can  only  be  acquired  in  connection  with  the  general 
system  of  education  into  which  it  should  enter  as  an  integral  part  from  the  beginning. 
The  latest  philosophy  of  education  reenforces  the  demands  of  productive  industry  by 
showing  that  that  which  fits  a  child  best  for  his  place  in  the  world  as  a  producer  tends  to 
his  own  highest  development  physically,  intellectually,  and  morally. 

There  seem  to  be  two  lines  in  which  industrial  education  may  be  developed — (1) 
through  the  existing  public  school  system,  and  (2)  through  independent  industrial 
schools.  In  regard  to  the  former  the  commission  recommends  that  cities  and  towns 
so  modify  the  work  in  the  elementary  schools  as  to  include  for  boys  and  girls  instruc- 
tion and  practice  in  the  elements  of  productive  industry,  including  agriculture  and 
the  mechanic  and  domestic  arts,  and  that  this  instruction  be  of  such  a  character  as  to 
secure  from  it  the  highest  cultural  as  well  as  the  highest  industrial  value;  and  that  the 
work  in  the  high  schools  be  modified  so  that  the  instruction  in  mathematics,  the  sci- 
ences, and  drawing  shall  show  the  application  and  use  of  these  subjects  in  industrial 


154  YEAEBOOE   OF    THE   DEPAP.TME^T    Of    AGRICULTURE. 

life,  with  special  reference  to  local  industries,  so  that  the  students  may  see  that  these 
ts  are  not  de-signed  primardy  and  solely  for  academic  purposes,  but  that  they 
may  be  utilized  for  the  purposes  of  practical  life — that  is.  algebra  and  geometry  should 
be  so  taught  in  the  public  schools  as  to  show  their  relations  to  construction;  botany  to 
ulture  and  agriculture:  chem  -  ..gri culture,  manufactures,  and  domestic 

sciences,  and  drawine  to  every  f  cm  of  industry. 

Tho  commission  would  also  recommend  that  all  towns  and  cities  provide,  by  new 
elective  industrial  courses  in  high  schools,  instruction  in  the  principles  of  agriculture 
and  the  domestic  and  mechani 

This  commission  has  been  continued,  and  Prof.  Paul  Hanus,  profes- 
sor of  the  history  and  art  of  teaching  in  Harvard  University,  has  been 
appointed  chairman.  Professor  Hanus  is  thoroughly  alive  to  the 
need  of  industrial  education,  believing  that  "the  education  demanded 
by  democratic  society  in  modern  times  must  be  a  preparation  for 
active  life."  and  that  '"the  only  real  preparation  for  life's  duties, 
opportunities,  and  privileges  is  participation  in  them,  so  far  as  they 
can  be  rendered  intelligible,  interesting,  and  accessible  to  children 
and  youth  of  school  age."  This  being  so.  he  favors  •'liberal  provision 
for  elementary  training  in  agriculture,  industrial  and  commercial 
pursuits,  in  addition  to  general  manual  training,  at  the  upper  end  of 
the  grammar  school  and  also  at  the  upper  end  of  the  high  school." 

In  New  York,  at  the  annual  meeting  of  the  State  Association  of 
School  Commissioners  and  Superintendents,  held  at  Cornell  Univer- 
sity, in  October,  1906.  the  best  means  of  adapting  rural  schools  to 
their  environment  was  discussed,  and  it  was  generally  agreed  that 
agriculture  should  be  taught  as  a  part  of  the  general  scheme  of  peda- 
.  of  which  it  should  be  the  basic  factor. 

In  Indiana  the  county  superintendents  in  twelve  counties  have 
:_ized  clubs  for  the  study  of  crops,  and  th    Ass     Nation  of  County 
rintendents  has  asked  Purdue  University  to  organize  a  training 
school  for  teachers  in  agriculture  and  nature  study. 

Th  Teachers'  Association  of  Michigan  at  its  meeting  in  1 

ted  resolutions  favoring  the  teaching  of  agriculture  in  the  public 
schools. 

In  Missouri  the  State  superintendent  made  the  following  statement 
in  his  report  for  1<»04: 

ged  at  county  teacht.  -ons  and  granges  that  the  ele- 

ments of  agriculture  be  taught  in  public  schools.     Since  then  sentiment  has  grown 
until  then  a  lemand  for  it.     For  five  years  the  law  has  recognized  it  by  making 

it  one  of  a  group  of  subjects  from  which  appli- .  :  to  be  examined  for  first- 

grade  cert  i  Sea*         S  ertificate.     T  ago  State  norm;.'.  ?:ablished 

depa:  agriculture  and  na:  There  are  now  many  teachers  in  the 

agriculture. 

In  1905  the  Missouri  State  Teachers'  Association  asked  that  agri- 
culture be  made  a  requirement  for  any  grade  of  teachers'  certificate; 
Id  ;  .r  a  joint  meeting  of  the   :  fcion 

and  the  State  Farmers'  Institute,  held  at  the  University  of  California 


ELEMENTARY    AGRICULTURE    IX    SCHOOLS.  155 

in  December,  1905,  and  attended  by  some  7,000  persons,  the  subject 
of  agricultural  education  was  discussed  from  various  points  of  view, 
and  as  a  result  of  this  meeting  a  committee  was  organized  to  promote 
the  interests  of  such  education  in  the  public  schools  of  the  State. 

At  a  conference  for  education  in  the  South,  held  at  Lexington,  Ky., 
in  May,  1906.  and  attended  by  leading  educators  from  a  number  of 
States,  much  attention  was  given  to  the  claims  of  agriculture  to  a 
place  in  the  school  curriculum. 

At  the  meeting  of  the  Virginia  State  Teachers'  Association  and 
affiliated  organizations  in  November,  1906,  the  teaching  of  agricul- 
ture in  the  public  schools  was  widely  and  thoroughly  discussed,  and 
President  Alderman,  of  the  University  of  Virginia,  in  the  closing 
address  of  that  great  meeting,  declared  that  among  the  things  which 
should  be  considered  as  settled  in  the  campaign  for  a  better  school 
system  now  being  actively  carried  on  in  that  State  was  that  agricul- 
ture in  some  form  should  be  generally  taught  in  the  schools. 

At  the  annual  convention  of  the  National  Educational  Association, 
held  at  Asbury  Park,  N.  J.,  in  July,  1905,  elementary  agricultural 
instruction  was  a  prominent  subject  of  discussion,  and  such  instruc- 
tion was  favored  in  the  annual  address  of  the  president,  DrAYilliamH. 
Maxwell,  superintendent  of  schools  of  New  York  City,  delivered  to 
thousands  of  teachers  at  the  opening  session.  The  committee  on 
industrial  education  in  schools  for  rural  communities,  appointed  two 
years  before,  brought  in  an  elaborate  report,  in  which  it  maintained 
"  that  the  rural  schools,  which  train  nearly  one-half  of  the  school  popu- 
lation of  this  country,  should  recognize  the  fact  that  the  major  portion 
of  their  pupils  will  continue  to  live  upon  the  farm,  and  should  pro- 
vide specific,  definite  technical  training  for  them  for  the  activities  of 
farm  life.  It  adduceel  strong  arguments  in  support  of  this  position 
and  emphasizeel  the  educational  value  as  well  as  the  practical  utility 
of  courses  of  study  framed  with  this  end  in  view.  The  committee 
favored  the  consolidation  of  rural  schools  in  orelcr  that  teachers 
specially  fitted  for  this  work  might  be  secured  and  the  instruction 
made  more  efficient.  It  also  advocated  the  establishment  of  high 
schools  to  meet  the  special  needs  of  the  rural  population  for  secondary 
education  directly  related  to  agricultural  practice." 

PROGRESS    IX    LEGISLATE  >X. 

Steady  progress  is  being  made  in  securing  legislation  favorable  to 
the  teaching  of  agriculture  in  public  schools.  The  laws  of  over  30 
States  now  permit  or  require  such  instruction.  Among  the  States 
which  rcepjire  the  teaching  of  agriculture  in  all  elementary  schools 
are  Alabama,  Georgia,  Louisiana,  Maine,  Maryland,  Mississippi,  North 
Carolina,  South  Carolina,  South  Dakota,  and  Vv'isconsin.  Legisla- 
tion on  this  subject  is  commonly  accompanied  with  provisions  making 


156  YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

agriculture  one  of  the  subjects  on  which  teachers  may  or  must  be 
examined.  In  Nebraska,  for  example,  candidates  for  first  and  second 
grade  county  certificates  must  pass  an  examination  in  the  elements 
of  agriculture.  In  Wisconsin,  since  1901,  teachers  have  been  required 
to  pass  an  examination  in  elementary  agriculture  in  order  to  secure 
any  grade  of  teachers'  certificate.  In  New  Hampshire  teachers  in 
>ndary  schools  are  required  to  hare  training  in  agriculture.  In 
Virginia  teachers  securing  first-grade  certificates  must  pass  an  exami- 
nation on  either  physical  geography,  elementary  physics,  or  elemen- 
tary agriculture.  In  Alabama.  Georgia.  Mississippi.  Missouri.  North 
Carolina,  and  South  Dakota  all  teachers  must  pass  examination  on 
this  subject.  In  New  York  the  new  syllabus  for  elementary  schools 
contains  nature  study  and  agriculture,  and  teachers  in  training 
classes  are  required  to  cover  all  subjects  in  the  syllabus.  In  Ohio  the 
Teachers'  Reading  Circle  requires  the  study  of  one  text-book  on  ele- 
mentary agriculture  each  year.  The  laws  are  also  beginning  to  rec- 
ognize the  fact  that  definite  provision  should  be  made  for  the  training 
of  teachers  along  agricultural  lines.  Thus  a  recent  act  in  Michigan, 
which  enables  counties  to  maintain  normal  training  classes  with  State 
aid,  requires  the  teaching  of  agriculture  to  such  classes.  In  Massa- 
chusetts the  legislature  appropriated  $5,000  for  normal  work  at  the 
State  Agricultural  College  as  one  result  of  the  report  of  the  commission 
on  industrial  education  above  referred  to. 

It  is  also  being  seen  that  the  high  schools  are  very  largely  the  insti- 
tutions in  which  the  teachers  of  the  rural  schools  receive  their  most 
advanced  training,  and  this  fact  is  now  making  it  easier  to  secure 
legislation  for  high-school  instruction  in  agriculture.  Already  under 
State  laws  there  are  agricultural  high  schools  in  Alabama.  California, 
Minnesota,  and  Wisconsin.  In  1905  the  Minnesota  legislature  passed 
an  act  providing  for  local  option  in  the  establishment  and  mainte- 
nance of  county  schools  of  agriculture  and  domestic  economy,  limiting 
JO, 000  the  amount:  which  any  county  may  appropriate  for  this 
purpose  in  one  year.  Two  or  more  counties  may  unite  to  establish 
such  a  school.  Each  school  must  have  connected  with  it  a  tract  of 
land  suitable  for  experiments  and  demonstrations  of  not  less  than 
10  acres. 

At  the  session  of  1906  the  Georgia  legislature  passed  an  act  estab- 
lishing 11  agricultural  high  schools,  as  branches  of  the  State  College 
of  Agriculture.  These  schools  will  each  receive  from  the  State  about 
00  a  year,  derived  from  the  inspection  fees  collected  by  the  State 
department  of  agriculture,  but  each  community  in  which  such  a 
school  is  located  must  furnish  not  less  than  200  acres  of  land  and  the 
necessary  equipment.  The  people  are  responding  enthusiastically  to 
this  requirement,  and  about  S^OO.OOO  in  land  and  money  lias  been 
offered  for  the  equipment  of  these  schools. 


ELEMENTARY    AGRICULTURE    IN    SCHOOLS.  157 

In  New  Hampshire,  beginning  with.  1906,  high  schools  and  acade- 
mies may  be  approved  b}T  the  State  superintendent  of  education  if 
they  are  prepared  to  teach  agriculture. 

Recent  legislation  in  Virginia  provides  for  the  establishment  of 
public  high  schools  under  the  authority  of  the  State  superintendent 
of  education.  Arrangements  are  being  made  to  open  about  150  such 
schools,  and  it  is  intended  to  make  instruction  in  agriculture  a  feature 
of  the  course  in  such  of  these  schools  as  are  located  in  the  rural 
districts. 

FORMULATION    OF    COURSES. 

One  of  the  objections  often  made  to  the  introduction  of  agriculture 
into  our  schools  is  that  the  teachers  do  not  know  what  should  be 
taught  under  this  head.  This  may  have  been  a  valid  excuse  in  the 
past,  but  to-day  is  no  longer  so.  While  there  is  still  much  differ- 
ence of  opinion  as  to  details,  the  general  scheme  of  instruction  has 
been  pretty  well  worked  out.  For  example,  the  Office  of  Experiment 
Stations  has  published  an  outline  plan  of  a  course  in  nature  study 
and  elementary  agriculture  for  rural  schools.  This  was  prepared  by 
a  committee  of  the  Association  of  American  Agricultural  Colleges  and 
Experiment  Stations,  and  therefore  represents  broadly  the  views  of 
educators  in  different  parts  of  the  countr}'  on  this  subject.  In  this 
publication, a  which  may  be  obtained  on  application  to  this  Depart- 
ment, it  is  suggested  that  during  the  first  six  years  of  the  child's 
attendance  at  school  he  should  be  led  to  make  observations  of  the 
plants  and  animals  on  the  farm  and  in  the  fields  and  woods,  together 
with  simple  studies  of  soils,  weather  conditions,  and  other  natural 
objects  and  phenomena.  A  more  formal  study  of  climate,  soils,  fer- 
tilizers, farm  crops,  fruits,  domestic  animals,  dairying,  farm  build- 
ings and  machinery,  market ing,  and  farm  accounts  is  outlined  for 
the  seventh  and  eighth  school  }~ears.  The  committee  has  followed 
this  with  a  series  of  simple  exercises  and  demonstrations  on  some  of 
the  elementary  principles  of  agriculture.  These  have  recently  been 
published  as  a  circular  of  the  Office  of  Experiment  Stations. 

In  Missouri  a  course  in  agriculture  for  the  public  schools  was  pre- 
pared several  years  ago  by  the  State  superintendent  of  schools.  This 
has  since  been  superseded  b}^  a  more  nearly  complete  presentation  of 
this  subject  in  a  bulletin  prepared  by  the  State  superintendent  and 
published  by  the  State  board  of  agriculture.  This  bulletin  advocates 
presenting  the  subject  of  agriculture  "(1)  by  experiments  at  home 
and  in  the  field,  (2)  by  studying  facts  as  given  in  texts  and  bulletins, 
and  (3)  by  school  gardens  connected  with  school  grounds."  Nu- 
merous experiments  and  observations  are  suggested  throughout  the 
bulletin. 

a  Office  of  Experiment  Stations  Circular  60,  The  Teaching  of  Agriculture  in  the 
Rural  Common  Schools. 


158  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

In  Illinois  a  somewhat  detailed  course  has  been  prepared  by  the 
dean  of  the  College  of  Agriculture.  This  course  is  arranged  bv 
nionths,  and  gives  suggestions  for  a  large  number  of  experiments  and 
observations  bearing  on  all  the  divisions  of  agriculture.  Consider- 
able reading  along  agricultural  lines  is  suggested,  as  well  as  drawing, 
composition,  and  other  work  intended  to  correlate  agriculture  with 
other  school  work.  This  Illinois  course  has  not  only  been  used  in 
thai  State,  but  has  also  been  adopted  by  several  other  States  and 
published  in  the  reports  of  their  State  superintendents  of  education. 

In  Minnesota  a  bulletin  prepared  by  Prof.  W.  M.  Hays,  then  pro- 
fessor of  agriculture  of  the  College  of  Agriculture  and  now  Assistant 
-  retary  of  Agriculture,  has  been  widely  used  in  the  schools  of  that 
and  other  States.  This  bulletin  contains  a  large  number  of  practical 
and  illustrative  exercises  for  use  in  connection  with  elementary 
instruction  in  agriculture. 

In  "Wisconsin  the  State  superintendent  of  public  instruction,  in 
1906.  prepared  an  outline  for  instruction  hi  the  elements  of  agricul- 
ture for  the  use  of  teachers  in  common  schools.  In  this  outline  it  is 
recommended  that  agriculture  be  taught  in  the  last  half  of  the  eighth 
year,  and  that  nature  study  be  given  in  all  grades  through  general 
exercises  and  in  connection  with  language  exercises,  geography,  reading, 
and  history.  The  outline  is  divided  into  three  parts,  (1)  agriculture, 
including  the  soil,  water  and  the  soil,  tilling  the  soil,  soil  enrich- 
ment, the  plant,  the  leguminous  plants,  plant  enemies,  rotation  of 
crops,  selection  of  seed,  the  farm  garden,  weeds,  and  home  and  school 
gardens:  (2)  farm  animals,  including  care  and  feeding,  type  forms, 
and  farm  economics,  and  (3)  farm  poultry. 

Outlines  of  courses,  sample  lessons,  and  other  helps  for  teachers  have 
also  been  published  by  the  State  departments  of  education  in  Georgia, 
Indiana.  Maine,  Michigan,  Missouri,  Nebraska,  North  Carolina,  Xew 
Hampshire,  Xew  York,  and  probably  in  other  States. 

The  Xew  York  State  department  of  education  has  published  a  sylla- 
bus of  a  course  in  agriculture  for  high  schools,  and  this  will  be  followed 
by  a  detailed  series  of  lessons  and  laboratory  and  field  exerci 

PREPARATION    OF    TEXT-BOOKS    AXD    MANUALS. 

The  demand  for  text-books,  manuals,  and  reference  books  on  agri- 
culture adapted  to  school  use  is  steadily  growing.  The  agricultural 
experts  connected  with  our  agricultural  colleges  and  experiment  sta- 
tions are  thus  encouraged  to  prepare  such  books,  and  publishers  are 
now  active  hi  seeking  for  books  of  this  character.  The  number  of  bul- 
letins useful  to  teachers  and  students  which  are  issued  by  the  United 
States  Department  of  Agriculture  and  the  State  experiment  stations 
has  greatly  increased  in  recent  years,  and  the  demand  for  these  from 
educational  institutions  is  now,  large.     Among  elementary  text-books 


ELEMENTARY    AGRICULTURE    IN    SCHOOLS.  159 

which  are  already  used  more  or  less  extensively  in  schools  are  Burkett, 
Stevens  and  Hill's  Agriculture  for  Beginners;  Goff  and  Mayne's  First 
Principles  of  Agriculture;  Bailey's  Principles  of  Agriculture;  Good- 
rich's First  Book  of  Farming;  Brooks's  Agriculture;  Jackson  and 
Daugherty's  Agriculture  through  the  Laboratory  and  School  Garden; 
Shepperd  and  McDowell's  Elements  of  Agriculture  (prepared  espe- 
cially for  North  Dakota  schools),  and  Hatch  and  Haselwood's  Ele- 
mentary Agriculture  with  Practical  Arithmetic.  The  last  mentioned 
is  an  interesting  attempt  to  correlate  instruction  in  agriculture  with 
that  in  arithmetic  by  connecting  with  the  several  lessons  in  agriculture 
a  number  of  practical  arithmetical  problems  directly  relating  to  the 
farm.  For  the  high-school  library  and  the  teachers'  use  we  have  such 
advanced  manuals  as  Hunt's  Cereals  in  America;  Smith's  Profitable 
Stock  Feeding;  Henry's  Feeds  and  Feeding;  Jordan's  Feeding  of 
Animals:  King's  Soil,  Irrigation  and  Drainage,  and  Physics  of  Agricul- 
ture ;  Decker's  Dairying;  Snyder's  Chemistry  of  Plant  and  Animal  Life ; 
Mead's  Irrigation  Institutions;  Taylor's  Agricultural  Economics, 
and  others.  For  general  reference  books  we  have  the  new  Interna- 
tional Encyclopedia;  Bailey's  Encyclopedia  of  Horticulture;  Wilcox 
and  Smith's  Encyclopedia  for  Farmers;  Bailey's  Garden  Craft  and 
Rural  Science  Series;  the  Yearbooks  of  the  United  States  Department 
of  Agriculture,  and  others  of  similar  character.  The  bulletins  and 
books  which  the  schools  can  easily  secure  contain  many  descriptions 
and  illustrations  of  simple  and  inexpensive  apparatus  and  other  facili- 
ties which  may  be  purchased  or  made  by  the  teacher.  There  is  no 
excuse  for  keeping  agriculture  out  of  the  schools  to-day  because  of  a 
lack  of  suitable  books  or  other  aids  to  such  instruction.  Suggestions 
for  the  adaptation  of  country  schoolhouses  to  this  new  work  are  now 
being  made.  At  Cornell  University  a  model  schoolhouse  is  being 
erected,  which,  in  addition  to  the  usual  recitation  room,  will  have  a 
large  laboratory  for  nature  study  and  elementary  agriculture. 

PROVISION    FOR    TRAINING    TEACHERS. 

Realizing  that  a  vital  point  in  the  effective  teaching  of  agriculture 
in  our  public  schools  is  the  training  of  teachers  in  this  subject,  the 
friends  of  this  movement  are  now  making  active  efforts  to  establish 
agricultural  courses  for  teachers  in  our  colleges  and  normal  schools. 
The  agricultural  colleges  in  a  number  of  States  have  given  instruction 
to  considerable  numbers  of  teachers  at  summer  schools.  They  are  now 
beginning  to  establish  regular  normal  courses,  provision  for  such  work 
having  recently  been  made  at  the  colleges  in  Illinois,  Mississippi, 
Massachusetts,  Michigan,  Missouri,  and  Xew  York.  The  colleges  in 
Ohio,  Iowa,  Illinois,  New  York,  Mississippi,  and  Rhode  Island  also  h 
so-called  extension  departments  which  are  seeking  to  come  into  close 


160  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

touch  with  teachers  as  well  as  with  country  boys  and  girls,  and  thus 
promote  the  wider  diffusion  of  agricultural  education.  These  colleges 
are  also  using  their  influence  to  turn  students  in  their  regular  courses 
to  the  career  of  teaching.  The  agricultural  high  schools,  whether 
attached  to  the  agricultural  colleges  or  independent  of  them,  are  also 
training  teachers.  Some  of  the  normal  schools  in  Alabama,  Georgia, 
Idaho,  Illinois,  Iowa,  California,  Louisiana,  Maine.  Massachusetts, 
Michigan.  Missouri,  Montana,  Nebraska,  North  Dakota.  Oklahoma, 
Texas,  Vermont,  Virginia,  Washington,  West  Virginia,  and  Wisconsin 
are  giving  regular  instruction  in  nature  study  and  elementary 
agriculture. 

ORGANIZATION  OF  AGRICULTURAL  SCHOOLS. 

Meanwhile  the  establishment  of  courses  in  agriculture  in  secondary 
and  primary  sch<  k  >1s  is  g»  >ing  on  in  different  parts  of  the  country.  The 
agricultural  high  schools  organized  in  connection  with  the  agricultural 
colleges  in  Minnesota,  Nebraska,  Oklahoma,  Rhode  Island,  and  Wash- 
ington report  an  increased  number  of  students,  and  are  better  equipped 
than  ever  before.  The  National  Farm  School  at  Doylestown,  Pa.,  has 
been  recognized  by  the  State  legislature,  which  granted  it  an  appro- 
priation of  $1 2,000,  to  be  used  for  agricultural  instruction.  This 
school  now  receives  more  applicants  for  admission  than  it  can  accom- 
modate, and  is  obliged  to  keep  a  waiting  list.  In  Wisconsin  the  Dunn 
County  School  of  Agriculture  and  Domestic  Economy  at  Menominee 
has  graduated  three  classes — 21  boys  and  girls  in  1004.  19  in  1905,  and 
16  in  1906.  The  California  Polytechnic  School,  at  San  Luis  Obispo,  has 
become  firmly  established  and  has  a  good  equipment  and  a  consider- 
able number  of  agricultural  students.     The  nine  district  agricultural 

ils  in  Alabama  are  steadily  growing  in  popularity,  and  the  effi- 
ciency of  their  agricultural  work  has  been  much  increased.  The  agri- 
cultural course  at  the  Mount  Hermon  School,  in  Massachusetts,  is  being 
well  maintained.  In  Missouri  agriculture  is  being  taught  in  200  high 
schools,  hi  Ohio  in  30,  and  in  one  or  more  schools  in  Alabama,  New 
Hampshire,    Pennsylvania,    New    York.    Iowa,    Kansas,    Nebr: 

la,  Indiana,  Maine.  Idaho.  Montana.  North  Dakota.  Oklahoma, 
South  Carolina,  Tennessee.  Texas.  Utah.  Virginia,  Washington,  and 
Wisconsin. 

agricultural  high  schools  have  recently  been  org  a  *>kston, 

Minn.,  and  Calvert,  Md.  At  the  latter  a  graduate  of  the  Iowa  Agri- 
cultural College  has  been  elected  principal,  and  a  course  of  study 

ly  following  the  course  recommended  by  the  committee  on 
instruction  in  agriculture  of  the  Association  of  American  Agricul- 
tural Colleges  and  Experiment  Stations"  has  been  adopted,  and  the 

a  Office  of  Experiment  Stations  Circular  GO. 


ELEMENTARY    AGRICULTURE    IN    SCHOOLS.  161 

agricultural  work  is  arousing  much,  interest  not  only  among  the  pupils 
but  also  among  the  farmers  of  the  county.  The  principal  visits  other 
schools  in  the  vicinity  for  the  purpose  of  getting  their  teachers  and 
pupils  interested  in  agricultural  subjects.  The  school  is  strictly  rural, 
and  although  it  has  been  running  only  since  the  1st  of  November,  1906, 
there  is  an  enrollment  of  47,  the  school  building  is  crowded,  and  already 
there  is  talk  of  a  new  building  next  year.  Georgia  is  organizing  eleven 
such  schools.  The  agricultural  courses  in  schools  for  negroes  at  Hamp- 
ton, Va.,  and  Tuskegee,  Ala.,  are  maintained  very  efficiently,  and 
efforts  are  being  made  to  strengthen  the  agricultural  courses  of  sec- 
ondary grade  in  a  number  of  the  land-grant  colleges  for  negroes  in 
other  Southern  States. 

In  Ohio  it  is  reported  that  elementary  agriculture  is  taught  in 
approximately  500  township  schools;  in  Missouri  in  3,000  schools;  in 
North  Dakota  in  300  schools;  and  this  subject  is  regularly  taught  in  a 
considerable  number  of  schools  in  Alabama,  Georgia,  Illinois,  Indiana, 
Indian  Territory,  Iowa,  Louisiana,  Maine,  Nebraska,  New  Hampshire, 
New  York,  Pennsylvania,  South  Carolina,  South  Dakota,  Virginia, 
Wisconsin,  and  Washington. 

NUMBER    OF    PUPILS    STUDYING    AGRICULTURE. 

Reliable  statistics  of  the  number  of  pupils  studying  agriculture  in 
our  public  schools  are  not  available,  but  from  the  reports  recently 
received  at  the  Office  of  Experiment  Stations  it  is  certain  that  they 
are  numbered  by  thousands.  From  the  report  of  the  State  super- 
intendent of  education  of  Missouri  for  1905  we  have  gathered  the 
following  interesting  statistics:  The  total  number  of  schools  doing 
high-school  work  in  that  State  is  555,  with  1,428  teachers  and  28,354 
students.  The  total  number  of  students  in  agriculture  is  1,180.  In 
the  sciences,  which  are  more  or  less  related  to  agriculture,  the  num- 
bers are  as  follows:  Botany,  2,742;  zoology,  1,905;  chemistry,  1,492; 
physics,  3,386;  physical  geography,  4,215;  physiology,  3,411.  Latin 
is  taken  by  14,117  students,  but  Greek  by  only  200.  In  manual 
training  there  are  2,582  students,  in  bookkeeping  1,534,  and  in 
stenography  436.  As  some  indication  of  the  number  of  farmers' 
children  in  these  high  schools  it  may  be  stated  that  there  are  4,000 
nonresident  pupils.  From  these  high  schools  come  very  largely 
the  teachers  required  by  the  elementary  country  schools,  and  3,000 
new  teachers  are  needed  for  these  schools  in  Missouri  each  year. 
These  statistics  show  several  things:  (1)  That  a  good  beginning 
has  been  made  in  teaching  agriculture  in  the  Missouri  high  schools; 
(2)  that  there  is  so  much  elementary  science  taught  in  these  schools 
that  there  should  be  little  difficulty  in  laying  a  proper  foundation 
for  effective  agricultural  instruction;    (3)  that   there   are  so  many 

3     A1906 n 


162  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

farmers'  children  in  these  schools  that  with  proper  courses  of  instruc- 
tion the  high  schools  of  Missouri  may  easily  become  powerful  agen- 
-  for  sending  back  to  the  farms  yoimg  people  thoroughly  alive 
to  the  advantages  of  country  life  and  the  requirements  of  a  pro- 
gressive agriculture:  (4)  that  it  is  vital  to  the  advancement  of  the 
best  interests  of  the  elementary  rural  schools  that  the  atmosphere 
and  instruction  of  schools  should  be  favorable  to  agriculture,  for  to 
these  high  schools  the  country  school  must  largely  look  for  teachers. 

HOW    FARMERS    MAY    HELP    THE    SCHOOLS. 

Having  now  reviewed  the  progress  which  has  been  made  in  recent 
years  in  opening  the  way  for  the  teaching  of  agriculture  in  our  public 

ols.  it  may  be  well  to  give  brief  attention  to  some  of  the  v. 
in  which  the  farmers  themselves  may  further  promote  the  improve- 
ment of  the  rural  schools  in  this  and  other  respects.  Our  agricul- 
tural communities  have  never  been  so  prosperous  as  to-day.  And 
there  is  every  reason  to  believe  that  with  intelligent  management 
of  the  land  and  sound  judgment  in  the  marketing  of  the  products 
this  prosperity  may  be  permanently  maintained.  The  farmers 
now  have  the  means  to  improve  not  only  their  lands  and  buildings, 
but  also  their  general  social  conditions.  The  experience  of  the  past 
century  has  shown  that  a  thorough  and  effective  school  system  in 
which  the  curriculum  recognizes  the  industrial,  intellectual,  and 
social  needs  of  the  community  is  a  most  influential  factor  in  pro- 
moting material  wealth,  as  well  as  a  broad  and  satisfactory  life. 
Our  farmers  will  be  wise,  therefore,  if  they  use  a  portion  of  their 
increased  means  to  strengthen  and  improve  the  rural  schools.  Some 
have  feared  that  agricultural  prosperity  would  lead  to  a  neglect  of 
education  in  our  rural  communities.  But  the  indications  are  that 
this  is  not  to  be  so.  Our  agricultural  colleges  and  schools  report 
both  an  increase  in  the  number  of  students  and  an  improvement  in 
their  quality.  It  appears  that  with  the  improvement  of  agricultural 
conditions  there  is  a  renewed  interest  in  farming  as  a  business,  and 
farm  boys  of  strong  mental  caliber  and  active  ambition  are  seeking 
in  larger  numbers  to  prepare  themselves  in  the  best  way  for  a  life  on 
the  farm. 

There  is  also  widespread  recognition  of  the  fact  that  our  present 
agricultural  prosperity  rests  on  a  different  basis  from  that  of  pre- 
vious periods  in  our  history.  There  have  been  times  when  multitudes 
of  our  farmers  were  prosperous  because  they  had  occupied  large  ai 
of  virgin  soil  freely  granted  them  by  the  Government  or  purchased  at 
a  very  low  price.  To-day  our  agricultural  prosperity  has  come  partly 
from  increased  demand  for  farm  products  at  home  and  abroad  and 
partly  from  the  more  skillful  use  of  the  land  and  the  growing  of  im- 
proved crops  and  animals.     And   the  improvement  of  agricultural 


ELEMENTARY   AGRICULTURE    IN    SCHOOLS.  163 

methods  and  products  has  been  very  largely  the  result  of  the 
work  of  the  United  States  Department  of  Agriculture  and  the  State 
experiment  stations.  Technical  and  scientific  knowledge  is,  as  never 
before,  a  requisite  of  the  most  successful  farming.  The  schools  can 
be  made  efficient  aids  to  the  acquirement  of  that  knowledge  which 
our  farm  youth  must  have  in  order  to  perpetuate  and  extend  the 
prosperity  which  their  fathers  now  enjoy.  Therefore  our  intelligent 
farmers  are  seeking  to  improve  the  rural  schools,  and  will  do  so 
more  actively  as  they  come  more  generally  to  understand  the  im- 
portance of  such  action. 

Better-trained  teachers,  improved  school  houses  and  grounds, 
more  apparatus  and  books,  free  transportation  of  pupils  to  consoli- 
dated schools,  high  schools  made  available  to  all  country  children, 
and  the  teaching  of  agriculture  and  home  ecomonics  will  cost  some- 
thing, and  if  they  are  to  be  had  they  must  be  paid  for.  But  unless 
all  past  experience  is  a  false  guide,  this  improved  school  system  will 
be  one  of  the  most  profitable  investments  ever  made  by  a  civilized 
community.  And  if  our  farmers  are  alert  to  their  interests  they 
will  push  these  improvements  along  rapidly,  and  they  will  not  permit 
the  entire  expense  to  come  out  of  the  taxable  farm  property.  The 
villages  and  cities,  whose  prosperity  rests  on  the  farms,  and  the 
accumulated  wealth  of  the  State  should  contribute  to  the  education 
of  the  rural  people.  This  is  already  recognized  in  a  number  of  our 
States  as  a  wise  and  just  principle.  The  nation  has  also  recognized 
it  by  appropriating  large  sums  for  the  higher  agricultural  education. 

It  can  not  be  too  strongly  urged  that  the  movement  for  the  im- 
provement of  the  rural  schools,  and  in  particular  for  the  teaching 
of  topics  directly  relating  to  agriculture  and  farm  home  life,  should 
receive  the  active  support  of  the  masses  of  our  farmers.  And  this 
support  should  be  felt  in  our  legislatures,  boards  of  education,  and 
local  school  management.  This,  will  require  study  of  the  present 
condition  of  our  rural  schools  and  careful  consideration  of  their 
needs.  As  regards  agricultural  instruction  there  should  be  an  under- 
standing of  what  the  elementary  and  secondary  schools  may  prop- 
erly teach  and  the  relation  of  such  studies  to  those  ordinarily  pursued 
in  our  schools.  For  example,  our  farmers  should  come  to  under- 
stand that  it  is  not  the  ordinary  practice  of  agriculture  which  can 
or  should  be  taught  in  the  public  schools.  It  is  rather  the  observation 
of  the  things  in  the  natural  world  which  the  farmer  has  to  deal  with, 
the  use  of  natural  laws  for  the  benefit  of  agriculture,  the  reasons 
why  certain  farm  practices  are  beneficial  and  others  injurious  to 
the  land  that  the  school  may  teach.  For  example,  in  a  dairy  region 
the  composition  of  milk,  the  causes  of  the  souring  of  milk,  and  the 
ways  of  preventing  this  may  be  taught  in  school;  in  a  potato-growing 
region,  the  nature  and  cause  of  potato  blight,  the  reason  why  it  is 
necessary  to  spray  the  vines  before  the  disease  appears;    where  the 


164  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

soils  are  deficient  in  nitrogen,  the  advantage  of  green  manuring 
with  leguminous  plants  and  the  reasons  therefor:  in  an  arid  region, 
the  use  of  the  soil  mulch  and  why  it  prevents  the  escape  of  soil  mois- 
ture. And,  above  all.  the  farmer  should  see  to  it  that  the  rural 
school-teacher  is  a  friend  of  agriculture  and  loses  no  good  opportunity  to 
show  his  or  her  pupils  the  advantages  and  opportunities  of  country  life. 

The  farmers  can  also  do  a  great  deal  to  promote  the  teaching  of 
agriculture  in  the  rural  schools  by  encouraging  the  teachers  to  take 
up  tins  subject  and  to  prepare  themselves  to  give  instruction  in  it. 
The  farmers  are  very  largely  the  managers  of  rural  schools  and  their 
children  are  the  teachers  in  them.  Merely  by  taking  an  active  inter- 
est in  the  local  schools,  inviting  the  teachers  and  scholars  to  visit  the 
farm,  especially  when  there  are  unusually  good  crops  and  fine  ani- 
mals to  be  seen  there,  or  sending  specimens  of  products  or  injurious 
birds  or  insects  to  the  school,  the  intelligent  farmer  may  help  to  create 
a  sentiment  hi  favor  of  agricultural  instruction  there.  Teachers, 
like  other  workers,  will  inevitably  respond  to  an  active  demand  for 
new  things.  As  soon  as  it  becomes  izeiierallv  understood  that  the 
farmers  are  bound  to  have  agriculture  taught  in  the  schools,  candi- 
dates for  teachers'  positions  will  get  ready  to  teach  it.  "With  many 
of  our  educational  leaders  fully  believing  that  subjects  directly  related 
to  the  life  work  of  the  pupils  should  be  taught  and  a  host  of  the  intel- 
ligent farmers  insisting  that  our  future  agricultural  prosperity  will 
largely  depend  on  such  teaching  in  the  schools,  a  way  will  surely  be 
found  to  bring  this  great  reform  to  a  successful  issue.  Meanwhile  let 
us  have  great  patience  with  even  the  most  imperfect  attempts  on  the 
part  of  our  schools  to  work  along  this  line.  The  whole  matter  of 
elementary  and  secondary  instruction  in  agriculture  is  in  an  experi- 
mental stage.  Many  trials  of  courses,  methods  of  teaching,  books, 
apparatus,  and  other  facilities  must  be  made  before  plans  fully  adapted 
to  the  conditions  of  different  agricultural  regions  can  be  matured. 
Intelligent  and  kindly  criticism  should  be  invited  and  utilized  by  all 
who  are  engaged  in  this  work.  In  this  way  alone  can  the  best  prog- 
ress be  made. 

What  is  now  being  done,  with  all  its  imperfections,  is  tremendously 
important.  Principles  of  action  are  being  determined.  Every  suc- 
cessful example  of  the  effective  teaching  of  agriculture,  whether  in  a 
little  country  school  or  in  the  agricultural  high  school,  is  helping  to 
indicate  along  what  line  the  future  growth  of  this  movement  must 
proceed.  There  is  therefore  much  cause  for  congratulation  that  in 
so  many  different  States  and  under  such  a  variety  of  conditions 
honest  and  substantial  efforts  are  being  made  to  solve  the  problems 
of  our  rural  schools  and  to  test  the  usefulness  of  agricultural  instruc- 
tion as  a  means  of  improving  country  life  and  perpetuating  agricul- 
tural prosperity. 


CAGE-BIRD  TRAFFIC   OF  THE  UNITED  STATES. 

By  Henry  Oldys, 
Assistant,  Biological  Survey. 

INTRODUCTION. 

Three  hundred  thousand  cage- birds,  largely  canaries,  are  annually 
imported  into  the  United  States.  Some  of  these  are  destined  for 
zoological  parks  and  a  few  for  private  aviaries,  but  the  great  majority 
find  their  way  into  the  hands  of  those  who  desire  to  have  a  cage-bird 
or  two  to  brighten  the  home.  This  yearly  influx  of  captive  birds  may 
seem  large,  considering  the  comparatively  small  number  usually  in 
evidence;  but  it  must  be  remembered  that  they  are  scattered  over  an 
area  of  more  than  3,000,000  square  miles,  and  are  distributed  among  a 
population  of  more  than  80,000,000,  which  allows  but  4  birds  a  year 
to  every  1,000  persons,  or  about  400  birds  to  a  city  of  the  size  of 
Columbus,  Ohio. 

The  practice  of  keeping  live  birds  in  confinement  is  worldwide  and 
extends  so  far  back  in  history  that  the  time  of  its  origin  is  unknown. 
It  exists  among  the  natives  of  tropical  as  well  as  temperate  countries, 
was  found  in  vogue  on  the  islands  of  the  Pacific  when  they  were  first 
discovered,  and  was  habitual  with  the  Peruvians  under  the  Incas  and  the 
Aztecs  under  Montezuma.  Caged  birds  were  popular  in  classic  Greece 
and  Rome.  The  Alexandrian  parrakeet — a  ring-necked  parrakeet  of 
India — which  is  much  fancied  at  the  present  day,  is  said  to  have  been 
first  brought  to  Europe  by  one  of  the  generals  of  Alexander  the 
Great.  Before  this  living  birds  had  been  kept  by  the  nations  of  west- 
ern Asia,  and  the  voices  of  bulbuls  and  other  attractive  singers  doubt- 
less added  to  the  charms  of  the  hanging  gardens  of  Babylon,  while 
in  China  and  Japan  the  art  of  domesticating  wild  birds  has  been  prac- 
ticed for  many  centuries. 

It  is  not  difficult  to  account  for  the  motive  that  underlies  this  wide- 
spread habit.  The  same  spirit  that  leads  to  the  domestication  of  wild 
flowers  for  adornment  of  the  home  and  the  pleasure  derived  from  their 
beauty  or  fragrance  is  responsible  for  the  similar  transplanting  of 
wild  birds  from  their  natural  homes  to  those  of  their  captors,  and 
the  parallel  extends  to  the  subsequent  production  of  new  varieties. 

As  a  people,  Americans  have  less  of  this  spirit  than  prevails  else- 
where. Despite  the  multitudes  of  birds  weekly  entering  the  country — 
a  single  vessel  will  occasionally  deliver  ten  or  fifteen  thousand — our 

165 


166  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

interest  in  avicultural  pursuits  is  comparatively  slight.  In  Europe 
aviaries  are  numerous  and  their  owners  maintain  a  common  interest 
by  means  of  avicultural  organizations  and  periodicals.  Bird  shows 
are  held  annually  or  oftener  in  London,  Berlin,  and  manjr  other  Euro- 
pean cities.  A  friendly  but  keen  rivalry  prevails  among  the  owners 
of  aviaries  as  to  which  shall  first  succeed  in  breeding  species  that  have 
not  previously  been  bred  in  captivity  or  in  producing  new  hybrids. 
The  journals  and  magazines  devoted  to  aviculture  serve  as  a  medium 
of  exchange  of  methods  and  experiences  and  keep  their  readers  in  touch 
with  each  other.  In  Germany,  particularly,  the  practice  of  keeping, 
rearing,  and  studying  cage-birds  is  very  common.  In  many  a  dwell- 
ing one  room  is  set  apart  for  birds,  and  these  bird  rooms  are  not  con- 
fined to  a  particular  class,  but  are  found  in  the  homes  of  people  of 
every  rank  and  condition.  As  long  ago  as  1880  some  200  societies 
of  amateurs  existed,  and  several  weekly  publications  and  magazines 
devoted  to  birds  attested  the  general  interest  in  avicultural  pursuits. 

The  breeding  of  cage-birds  for  sale  is  a  regular  occupation  in  several 
parts  of  Europe.  Germany  produces  hundreds  of  thousands  of  sing- 
ing canaries  in  the  Harz  Mountains,  those  of  St.  Andreasburg  being 
unrivaled  songsters  ;  in  England,  Scotland,  and  Belgium  fancy  vari- 
eties of  canaries  are  regularly  bred  for  the  trade;  and  at  the  Royal 
Society's  zoological  gardens  of  Antwerp,  Belgium,  the  breeding  of 
many  species  of  foreign  cage -birds  is  systematically  conducted. 

The  United  States  has  few  aviaries,  and  most  of  these  are  devoted  to 
pheasants  and  other  large  birds.  For  a  few  years  an  avicultural  peri- 
odical was  published,  but  the  support  it  received  was  apparently  insuf- 
ficient, and  at  present  there  seem  to  be  no  periodicals  and  very  few 
associations  strictly  devoted  to  aviculture.  Hence  in  this  country 
there  is  not  that  community  of  interest  and  information  that  charac- 
terizes the  avocation  in  Europe.  America  supports  a  few  small  shows, 
mainly  exhibitions  of  canaries;  and  small  exhibitions  of  cage  birds, 
mostly  canaries,  are  usually  held  as  adjuncts  to  the  annual  poultry 
shows  of  New  York,  Boston,  Chicago,  Toronto,  and  other  cities. 
The  breeding  of  canaries  and  cage-birds  for  the  trade  in  any  numbers 
is  practically  unknown  on  this  side  of  the  Atlantic. 

TRAFFIC    IN    DOMESTIC    BIRDS. 

The  once  extensive  trade  in  native  American  birds  has  dwindled  to 
the  vanishing  point.  Formerly  mockingbirds,  bluebirds,  cardinals, 
tanagers,  indigo  birds,  and  nonpareils  were  caught  in  large  numbers 
and  sold  either  here  or  abroad,  and  more  or  less  trade  in  other  species 
prevailed.  Bluebirds,  which  are  known  as  blue  robins  or  blue 
nightingales  in  England  and  France,  were  imported  into  England  some 
time  before  1869,  as  in  that  year  they  were  first  bred  in  the  London 


CAGE-BIRD    TRAFFIC    OF    THE    UNITED    STATES.  167 

Zoological  Gardens.  They  are  regarded  with  much  favor  by  amateurs 
and  have  been  repeatedly  bred  in  private  aviaries.  Mockingbirds 
were  bred  in  French  aviaries  before  1873.  While  intolerant  of  cage 
mates,  they  are  much  valued  in  Europe  for  their  song,  which,  how- 
ever, is  there  considered  inferior  to  that  of  the  nightingale — a  judg- 
ment partly  assisted,  perhaps,  by  patriotic  bias  and  association. 
Scarlet  tanagers  and  cardinals  are  ranked  very  high  in  Europe, 
and  frequently  win  prizes  in  bird  shows.  Evidence  of  the  esteem  as 
cage-birds  in  which  the  latter  are  held  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  they 
are  listed  on  the  price  list  of  a  London  bird  dealer  for  September, 
1906,  at  more  than  $5  apiece.  Of  interest  in  this  connection  is  the 
statement  of  Gemelli  Careri,  quoted  by  Nuttall  in  his  Manual  of 
Ornithology  published  in  1832,  that  "the  Spaniards  of  Havana  in  a 
time  of  public  distress  and  scarcity  bought  so  many  of  these  birds 
[cardinals],  with  which  a  vessel  was  partly  freighted  from  Florida, 
that  the  sum  expended  at  $10  apiece  amounted  to  no  less  than 
$18,000."  Indigo  birds  and  nonpareils  are  valued  for  their  attractive 
plumage.  Of  the  latter  thousands  were  annually  exported  to  Europe, 
where  they  sold  for  $1.50  to  $2  apiece. 

In  consequence  of  the  continual  trapping  to  supply  the  increasing 
demand,  several  of  these  birds  became  rare  in  localities  where  once 
they  had  been  common.  Nearly  every  State  had  a  law  protecting 
nongame  birds,  but  such  laws  were  at  that  time  imperfectly  framed 
and  ineffectively  enforced.  The  usual  exception  authorizing  the  keep- 
ing of  birds  in  cages  as  domestic  pets  was  unaccompanied  by  any 
restriction  on  trade,  which,  in  consequence,  flourished.  Imperfect  as 
these  laws  were,  they  were  rendered  still  less  effective  by  the  absence 
of  public  interest  in  their  observance  and  adequate  provision  for  their 
enforcement.  Gradually,  however,  the  influence  of  the  bird-protec- 
tive movement  began  to  make  itself  felt  and  the  laws  were  improved. 
One  State  after  another  adopted  a  model  law  framed  by  a  committee 
of  the  American  Ornithologists'  Union,  which  instead  of  simply  pro- 
hibiting the  killing  of  a  few  birds  specifically  named,  as  had  formerly 
been  done,  prohibited  the  killing,  capture,  or  possession  of  all  birds 
other  than  game  birds  and  a  few  injurious  species,  and  interdicted  all 
trade  in  them.  The  interest  in  bird  life  awakened  by  the  efforts  of 
this  organization  and  the  various  State  Audubon  societies  caused 
these  laws  to  be  more  or  less  vigorously  enforced,  and  the  trade  in 
native  birds  declined  proportionately.  Supplies  were  still  obtained, 
however,  from  States  that  had  not  adopted  modern  laws,  and  the 
export  trade  to  Europe  continued  brisk.  One  by  one  these  remain- 
ing strongholds  were  carried  by  the  forces  of  bird  protection  until 
finally,  in  1904,  Louisiana,  the  only  State  left  from  which  birds  were 
procurable,  adopted  the  model  law,  and  now,  beyond  a  few  surrepti- 
tious and  illegal  shipments,  the  domestic  and  foreign  trade  in  native 


168  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

American  birds  has  been  entirely  abolished.  Occasionally  a  smail 
consignment  of  mockingbirds  or  cardinals  is  smuggled  to  Hamburg 
or  some  other  European  port,  but  the  life  of  the  trade  is  gone. 

TRAFFIC    IN    FOREIGN    BIRDS, 

The  importation  of  foreign  cage-birds  has  grown  to  its  present  pro- 
portion, not  only  in  this  country,  but  in  Europe  as  well,  within  the 
last  fifty  years.  Up  to  the  middle  of  the  last  century,  apart  from 
parrots  and  some  other  of  the  larger  species,  few  birds  were  imported 
into  Europe,  and  as  late  as  1860  only  about  60  different  kinds  of  for- 
eign birds  were  brought  in,  and  these  in  moderate  numbers.  But 
about  this  time  a  rapid  increase  began,  and  by  1S80  the  species  im- 
ported approximated  TOO  and  the  individuals  from  500,000  to  800,000. 
The  Japanese  robin,  a  favorite  cage-bird  of  to-day,  was  first  brought 
to  the  London  Zoological  Gardens  in  1886,  and  the  shell  parrakeet  of 
Australia,  now  one  of  the  best  known  of  exotic  birds,  and  sold  at  whole- 
sale in  London  for  about  $1.37  a  pair,  was  first  brought  to  England 
by  Gould  in  1840.  and  for  the  next  ten  years  commanded  $100  to  $1*25 
a  pair. 

In  the  United  States  the  growth  of  importation  has  undergone  a 
similar  development,  lagging,  however,  slightly  behind  the  Euro- 
pean growth.  In  both  cases  the  sudden  invasion  of  the  markets  by 
foreign  birds  was  due  to  the  advantages  of  quick  transportation.  When 
supplies  from  distant  lands  were  brought  by  sailing  vessels  but  few 
birds  survived  the  long  vo3'ages.  But  the  steamship  afforded  oppor- 
tunity for  conveying  birds  with  speed  and  safety,  and  dealers  were 
quick  to  avail  themselves  of  the  changed  conditions.  As  long  ago  as 
1865  there  was  a  brisk  Americau  trade  in  foreign  cage-birds  of  all 
kinds,  and  by  1880  this  had  so  increased  that  a  single  dealer  in  New 
York  City  handled  70,000  canaries  each  season. 

NUMBER   OF  BIF.D8    IMPORTED. 

The  decline  in  the  trade  in  domestic  cage-birds  has  doubtless 
stimulated  the  trade  in  foreign  cage-birds,  which  advanced  from 
235,433  imported  under  permit  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture  in 
the  3Tear  ending  June  30,  1902,  to  322,297  in  the  year  ending  June 
30,  1906,  an  increase  of  37  per  cent  in  four  years.  At  the  beginning  of 
this  period  the  model  bird-protective  law  previously  mentioned  had 
been  adopted  by  16  States;  at  its  close  it  was  in  force  in  35. 

Of  the  birds  imported  in  the  jTear  ending  June  30.  1906,  274.914 
were  canaries  and  47,383  miscellaneous  birds.  The  canaries  were 
nearly  all  raised  in  Germany.  Thirty-three  per  cent  of  the  miscella- 
neous birds  were  from  the  Orient,  30  per  cent  from  Europe.  22  per  cent 
from  Australia,  7  per  cent  from  Cuba  and  Mexico,  6  per  cent  from 


CAGE-BIKD    TRAFFIC    OF    THE    UNITED    STATES.  169 

Africa,  and  1  per  cent  from  South  America.  The  remaining1 1  per 
cent  were  of  unknown  origin.  In  addition  to  these,  2,700  canaries, 
mostly  from  Germany,  and  about  6,000  oarrots  from  various  tropical 
countries  came  in  without  permit,  no  permit  being  issued  for  these 
birds  when  they  are  unaccompanied  by  others. 

HOW    BIRDS    ARE   SECURED. 

A  peep  behind  the  scenes  is  always  interesting,  and  when  we  see 
diverse  and  remote  regions  of  the  world  pouring  their  treasures  of 
bird  life  into  our  country  a  desire  is  awakened  to  know  by  what  means 
this  is  accomplished. 

In  some  cases  the  method  is  as  old  as  the  history  of  maritime  com- 
merce. From  the  time  when  vessels  began  to  make  voyages  to  other 
countries  sailors  have  brought  back  trophies  of  various  sorts,  includ- 
ing specimens  of  the  fauna  of  distant  lands.  Some  birds  are  still  thus 
brought  in  and  are  bought  by  dealers  in  the  various  ports  of  entry. 

This  method,  somewhat  systematized,  prevails  at  San  Francisco, 
where  the  trade,  temporarily  suspended  by  the  earthquake  and  fire,  is 
now  beginning  to  revive.  Supplies  are  here  obtained  from  the  crews 
of  steamers  coming  from  China  and  Japan,  who  make  a  regular  business 
of  transporting  cage- birds,  usually  under  an  arrangement  with  the 
steamship  companies  by  which  they  are  employed  whereby  freight 
is  paid  out  of  the  proceeds  of  sales.  The  birds  thus  imported  are  con- 
siderable in  number,  but  few  in  species,  being  mainly  Java  sparrows, 
diamond  sparrows,  Chinese  mockingbirds,  and  other  common  kinds. 

But  most  of  the  birds  imported  are  secured  by  more  highly  organized 
methods.  Several  of  the  leading  importers  maintain  forces  of  men  to 
secure  the  desired  birds  either  in  their  native  haunts  or  in  European 
ports  to  which  they  are  brought  by  the  agents  of  other  importers. 

Parrots  are  generally  taken  while  still  in  the  nest.  During  the  nest- 
ing season  the  leading  American  houses  send  men  to  Cuba,  Mexico,  or 
South  America  to  obtain  stock.  Headquarters  are  established  by  these 
agents  at  some  point  convenient  to  the  parrot  country  and  natives  are 
employed  to  secure  the  young  birds,  which  are  forwarded  to  the  United 
States  in  periodical  shipments.  Agents  have  sometimes  been  sent  from 
this  country  to  Africa  to  secure  supplies  of  the  favorite  African 
gray  parrot,  but  these  are  usually  obtained  in  European  ports  from 
vessels  arriving  with  supplies  for  the  large  European  houses. 

Small  birds,  other  than  canaries,  are  generally  captured  with  nets. 
Expert  netters  continually  visit  remote  regions  in  the  interest  of  whole- 
sale houses  of  Hamburg,  London,  Liverpool,  and  other  large  cities  of 
Europe.  Similar  expeditions  are  dispatched  from  New  York  and 
Philadelphia  to  Cuba  and  Mexico  and  occasionally  to  more  distant 
lands — even  India;  but  the  principal  American  houses  maintain  con- 
nections with  establishments  in  Germany,  through  which  their  supplies 
of  Old  World  and  South  American  birds  are  more  commonly  procured. 


170  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    BEPABTMEXT    OF    AGBICTTLTUBE. 

Canari  -  btained  by  agents  who  visit   breeders  in  the  Harz 

Mountain.-,  the  Tyrol,  and  other  parts  of  Europe.     A  few,  b 

:nported  at  San  Francisco  from  breeders  in  China  and  Japan. 

HOW  BEKDS    *****  SHIPPED. 

of    the  small  birds  received  from  Africa  and  Australia  are 
shipped  in  large  bo:  .ially  prepared  for  the  pur]  PI. 

VIII,  fig.  1  » are  of  different  sizes  and  accommodate  from 

1  to  125  or  150  bir    -  ._        rise  of  box  or  of  birds  shipped. 

Shell  parrakeets  are  sent  from  Australia  in  especially  large  box--, 
som*  -  many  as  500  making  the  journey  in  a  single  box.     The 

birds  so  shipped  are  of  a  peaceable  disposition   and  may  be  caged 

I   rher  without  fear  of  their  injuring  one  another;  but  some  bi 
such  as  buIU   .       -.    g  bes,  :tnd  male  canari-  .me, 

and  each  bird  has  to  be  placed  in  a  separat 

-mall  wicker  ca_  n  of  which  are 

;g  on  a  n-tituting  what  is  technically  known  as  a  row. 

VThen  shipped  across  the  ocean  these  rows  a:  1  and  a  linen  or 

burlap  sack  specially  made  for  the  purpose  is  placed  about  each  crate 
(see PI.  VIII.  rigs.  2and3).  Aerate  usually  contains  33  rows.  To  para- 
phrase the  old  riddle — every  sack  has  33  row-  has  7  cages, 
_-  has  1  canary  (or  sometimes  2  if  the  occupants  are  the  more 
peaceable  females).  Often  more  than  two  doze  -  are  shipped 
in  one  consignment.     Each  of  these  must  be  opened  every  day  of  the 

ry  row  re  .  and  food  and  water  placed  in  the  ca . 

In  this  daily  re-crating  the  rows  are  rearranged  so  that  the  benefits  of 
-      >ns  may  be  m  ^mong  the  birds. 

1  hn  arrival  in  port  consignments  of  birds  'which  pay  no  duty)  are 
entered  at  the  custom-house  under  permit  from  the  Department  of 
Agriculture,  usually  secured  in  advance  by  the  importer.  The  larger 
shipments  are  generally  examined  by  one  of  the  special  inspectors  of 
irtment  stationed  at  the  principal  ports  of  entry.  Nearly  all 
shipments  subject  to  such  inspection  enter  at  New  York  and  Phila- 
delphia. After  the  inspector  has  examined  a  consignment  to  ascer- 
tain that  it  contains  no  objection-  ies,  and  has  noted,  for  sub- 
sequent report  to  the  Department,  the  number  and  kinds  of  bir 
con.                 ie  importer  is  free  to  dispose  of  it. 

It  is  the  aim  of  the  importer  to  seli  dc  as  qui:  jle, 

to  dimini-h  his  losses  by  death  and  so  increase  his  profit.  It  is  esti- 
mated that  the  mortality  en  route  and  in  the  store  among  some  of  the 
more  delicat-  birds,  such  as  African  finches,  may  reach  14 

per  cent. 

7.  ological  parks  and  aviaries  are  usually  supplied  direct  by  the 
importers,  but  the  general  public  is  reached  by  way  of  the  retailer. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  VIII 


Methods  of  Shipping  and  Testing  Cage  Birds. 

[1.— Cage  for  shipping  small  birds  |  see  p.  170).  2.— Crate  oi  canaries  ready  for  shipment 
(see  p.  170).  3.— Crate  of  canaries  partly  open  to  show  rows  of  cages  see  p.  170). 
*■— Testing  singing  of  canaries  (see  p.  173).] 


CAGE-BIED    TRAFFIC    OF    THE    UNITED    STATES.  171 

Many  small  bird  stores  are  scattered  over  the  country,  and  some  of 
the  large  department  stores  have  added  birds  to  the  great  variety  of 
merchandise  the}^  handle.  Small  consignments  are  shipped  to  retail 
dealers  by  express  (at  double  rates).  In  the  cages  or  boxes  are  placed 
water  and  food  sufficient  to  last  until  arrival  at  destination.  Some- 
times, when  the  distances  are  unusually  long,  the  express  messengers 
supply  fresh  water  and  food  en  route,  and  large  consignments  are 
often  accompanied  by  agents  of  the  importers.  Several  of  the  princi- 
pal importers  have  branch  establishments  at  various  points,  such  as 
New  Orleans,  Chicago,  and  San  Francisco,  which  fill  western  orders. 

THE  RETAIL  TEADE  IN  BIRDS. 

While  retailers  do  more  or  less  business  during  the  entire  year, 
three  well-defined  seasons  are  established.  In  February  canaries 
begin  to  breed,  and  for  the  first  two  or  three  months  of  the  year  the 
trade  in  breeding  canaries,  especially  females,  is  brisk.  About  the 
time  it  subsides  the  first  shipments  of  young  parrots  arrive  from  Cuba 
and  Mexico.  These  at  once  take  the  stage  and  hold  it  until  the  mid- 
dle of  August,  when  it  is  no  longer  possible  to  secure  young  birds. 
Interest  then  turns  chiefly  to  singing  canaries  and  the  many  other  small 
cage-birds  that  are  imported.  The  sale  for  these  grows  greater  and 
greater  and  reaches  its  maximum  by  Christmastide,  after  which  it 
abruptly  declines.  Many  dealers  probably  make  more  sales  in  Decem- 
ber than  during  all  the  rest  of  the  year.  In  the  Christmas  season  of 
1905  one  Philadelphia  department  store  sold  4,000  canaries,  besides 
other  cage-birds. 

From  the  character  of  the  demand  for  cage-birds  it  is  evident  that 
the  retail  trade  is,  as  a  rule,  not  enough  by  itself  to  yield  a  profitable 
income.  It  is  usually,  therefore,  combined  with  some  trade  of  an 
allied  nature.  In  retail  bird  stores  one  may  usually  find  fowls  of 
various  kinds,  pheasants,  dogs,  monkeys,  squirrels,  white  mice,  guinea- 
pigs,  goldfish,  and  even  lizards  and  snakes.  The  sale  of  food  and 
cages  also  constitutes  an  item,  and  sometimes  the  proprietor  acts  as 
surgeon  and  physician  to  domestic  pets. 

SPECIES   IMPORTED. 

During  the  year  ending  June  30,  1906,  more  than  200  species  of 
cage-birds  were  imported  into  the  United  States.  These  comprised 
canaries,  parrots  (under  which  term  we  may  include  parrakeets,  cocka- 
toos, macaws,  and  lories),  European  birds,  Oriental  birds,  African 
birds,  Australian  birds,  and  a  few  South  American,  Mexican,  and 
Cuban  birds.  It  is  obviously  impossible,  in  the  space  of  the  present 
article,  to  consider  all  these  in  detail;  but  a  brief  account  of  some  of 
the  most  important  will  be  of  interest. 


172  YEAKBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


So  widely  known  has  the  sweet -singing  canary  become  that  should 
an  inhabitant  of  one  of  the  civilized  countries  of  the  world  visit  the 
Canary  Islands  and  hear  the  wild  birds  in  their  native  home  the  strains 
would,  in  all  probability,  bring  to  the  traveler  memories  of  his  own 
home.  The  clear  and  varied  notes  of  this  favorite  singer  are  familiar 
to  young  and  old.  and  many  dwellings,  from  the  great  mansion  to  the 
obscure  cottage,  are  alike  brightened  by  their  beauty.  The  position 
of  the  canary  among  cage-birds  is  unique — not  only  because  of  its 
widespread  popularity,  but  also  from  the  fact  that  centuries  of  domes- 
tication have  rendered  it  peculiarly  dependent  on  man.  Its  cage  has 
become  its  natural  home  and  to  it  liberty  would  probably  mean  death. 

The  bird  is  a  native  of  the  Canary  Islands,  the  Azores,  and  Funchal 
(Madeira),  and  is  said  to  have  been  brought  from  the  Canaries  to  Spain 
and  kept  as  a  cage-bird  by  the  Spanish  nobility  shortly  before  the  time 
of  the  discovery  of  America.  Other  accounts  make  Italy  the  tirst 
country  into  which  it  was  introduced  and  place  the  time  early  in  the 
sixteenth  century.  It  is  sufficient  for  present  purposes  to  note  that 
it  has  been  domesticated  and  prized  as  a  cage-bird  for  the  past  four 
centuries.  The  wild  bird  is  smaller  than  the  bird  now  so  familiar,  and 
is  also  differently  colored,  having  less  bright  yellow  and  considerable 
olive  and  brownish  in  its  coloring.  Nor  does  it  sing  as  sweetly. 
Nevertheless,  it  is  so  attractive  that  soon  after  its  introduction  it 
became  a  general  favorite,  and  was  bred  so  assiduously  that  it  is  said 
that  by  the  beginning  of  the  eighteenth  century  27  different  varieties 
were  produced.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  canaries  are  now 
exported  from  England  to  the  Canary  Islands. 

The  canary  is  a  very  good  imitator.  Mature  birds  have  been  known 
to  reproduce  very  closely  the  songs  of  even  such  birds  as  chewinks, 
house  wrens,  and  others,  and  the  faculty  has  been  utilized  by  breeders 
to  determine  to  a  certain  extent  the  quality  or  character  of  the  song  of 
a  voung  bird.  In  Germany  young  canaries  have  been  associated  with 
nightingales  and  in  England  with  woodlarks  to  this  end.  But  the 
method  commonly  employed  at  present  is  to  place  the  young  bird  with 
a  canary  that  possesses  a  superior  song  and  is  kept  solely  for  training 
purposes.  The  tine  singers  used  for  this  purpose  are  called  "cam- 
paninis"  and  command  high  prices.  Singers  are  measured  by  the  rich- 
ness and  sweetness,  not  the  strength,  of  their  tones.  Thus  the  voice 
of  one  of  the  choice  St.  Andreasburg  "  rollers"  (which  sell  at  whole- 
sale for  $2-4  to  $36  a  dozen,  according  to  season,  while  ordinary  canaries 
range  from  §15  to  $21  a  dozen)  could  easily  be  drowned  by  the  sing- 
ing of  many  an  inferior  canary.  A  single  bird  with  a  superior  voice, 
especially  a  campanini.  will  sometimes  command  a  price  for  which 
several  dozen  ordinary  singers  can  be  bought.     Ordinary  female  birds, 


CAGE-BIED    TRAFFIC    OF    THE    UNITED    STATES.  173 

on  the  other  hand,  which  are  purchased  mainly  for  breeding  purposes, 
may  be  had  as  low  as  $6  a  dozen  at  wholesale. 

As  previously  stated,  singing  canaries  are  bred  in  the  Harz  Moun- 
tains of  Germany.  Large  numbers  are  raised  by  the  cottagers  of  this 
region  and  are  bought  directly  from  them  by  buyers  for  the  wholesale 
establishments  of  Germany  and  England  and  the  German  branches  of 
American  establishments.  How  much  the  industry  means  to  the  peas- 
ants near  St.  Andreasburg,  the  Brocken,  and  other  localities  in  the 
Harz  Mountains  may  be  gathered  from  the  fact  that  thirty  years  ago 
it  was  estimated  that  the  trade  amounted  to  $300,000  a  year. 

Some  canaries  sing  much  more  freely  than  others,  and  immediately 
after  the  arrival  of  a  consignment  at  the  store  of  the  importer  the  inter- 
esting process  of  testing  the  singing  qualifications  of  the  different 
individuals  is  begun.  Cages  are  piled  one  deep  in  a  tier  containing  40 
or  50  rows.  In  front  of  this  large,  somewhat  semicircular  pile,  each 
cage  containing  a  single  occupant,  sits  the  tester,  watching  and  listen- 
ing (see  PL  VIII,  fig.  4).  Many  notes  are  to  be  heard,  but  it  is  difficult 
to  determine  from  which  of  the  many  scores  of  throats  they  proceed. 
This  is  the  duty  assigned  the  tester,  and  when  he  is  certain  that  any 
particular  bird  is  singing,  he  places  a  chalk  mark  on  the  cage  contain- 
ing it.  Marked  cages  are  subsequently  removed  and  their  occupants  are 
sold  as  guaranteed  singers.  Testing  canaries  is  difficult  and  requires 
both  patience  and  training,  yet  on  a  clear,  sunny  day,  when  the  birds 
sing  more  freely  and  can  be  more  clearly  seen,  an  expert  will  some- 
times mark  500  cages. 

In  the  breeding  of  canaries  song  has  not  been  the  only  desideratum, 
but  has  shared  consideration  with  shape  and  color.  The  potency  of 
artificial  selection  is  as  well  shown  in  this  pursuit  as  in  the  rearing  of 
fancy  pigeons,  and  some  quite  as  distorted  shapes  are  produced.  Thus 
Belgium  has  succeeded  in  giving  to  the  world  a  big  canary  with  broad 
shoulders  abnormally  raised  above  the  small  head.  And  Scotland  has 
produced  a  type — the  Scotch  fancy  canary — that  is  bent  like  a  bow,  so 
that  when  the  bird  is  at  rest  on  a  perch  a  line  drawn  from  bill  to  tip 
of  tail  would  pass  well  in  front  of  the  feet.  Other  abnormal  products 
of  breeders*  ingenuity  are  the  Yorkshire  canary,  very  long  and  very 
slim,  and  the  Lancashire  or  Manchester  coppy,  well  proportioned,  but 
a  veiy  giant  among  canaries. 

Still  other  fancy  varieties  are  the  Norwich  canary,  at  present  a 
popular  favorite,  the  London  fancy  canary,  the  border  fancy  canary, 
and  the  lizard  canary,  a  dark  bird  with  gold  or  silver  spangles  and 
yellow  crown.  All  these  are  further  subdivided  by  breeders  and 
fanciers.  Norwich  canaries  and  Manchester  coppies  are  frequently 
ornamented  with  crests.  Endowing  with  a  crest  a  bird  that  has  none 
naturall}*  is  striking  evidence  of  the  possibilities  of  artificial  selection. 


174  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AGRICULTURE. 

The  diversity  is  further  augmented  by  color  possibilities.  All 
canaries  are  either  "yellow"  or  "buff.'*  These  are  technical  terms, 
however,  and  are  somewhat  misleading.  A  yellow  (or  jonque)  canary 
is  one  whose  plumage  is  lustrous;  a  buff  (or  mealy)  one  is  one  whose 
plumage  is  dull  and  has  a  frosted  appearance.  Cinnamon  canaries  with 
pink  eyes,  and  green  and  piebald  canaries  also,  are  bred,  and  a  few 
decades  ago  it  was  discovered  that  by  feeding  young  canaries  freely  on 
cayenne  pepper  the  yellow  could  be  deepened  into  a  rich  orange.  The 
combinations  offered  by  these  different  characteristics  are  very  numer- 
ous, and  when  to  them  are  added  the  results  of  hybridizing  with  other 
species — goldfinch,  linnet,  siskin,  and  others — as  is  done  for  the  pro- 
duction of  the  much-prized  "mules."  unlimited  possibilities  seem  to 
open  out  before  the  breeder.  In  breeding  for  shape  and  color,  singing 
qualities  are  neglected,  and  canaries  in  which  these  are  so  highly 
developed  often  have  little  left  of  the  sweet  song  that  was  the  chief 
cause  of  their  original  domestication. 

In  view  of  the  great  number  of  varieties  that  have  been  produced 
and  the  differences  in  style  and  quality  of  song,  and  taking  into  con- 
sideration also  the  patience,  care,  and  skill  bestowed  by  breeders  in 
producing  and  maintaining  at  an  established  standard  the  various 
results  of  their  work,  it  is  not  surprising  to  find  great  differences  in 
the  prices  of  canaries.  Ordinary  male  canaries  may  be  bought  for 
$1.50  to  $2  apiece  at  retail,  and  from  this  the  prices  rise,  through 
Norwich.  Yorkshire,  lizard,  Manchester,  and  Belgian  canaries  in  order, 
and  reach  in  the  last  a  wholesale  rate  of  $30  to  $50  a  pair.  Song  pro- 
duction has  not  been  led  into  bizarre  channels,  and  that  "beauty  of  song 
is  more  highly  estimated  than  odd  shape  is  shown  by  the  fact  that 
one  of  the  finest  singers  among  the  "rollers"  may  command  as  much 
as  *150. 

PARROTS. 

So  far  as  known,  the  first  introduction  of  parrots  into  Europe 
occurred  in  the  fourth  century  B.  C,  when,  it  is  related,  one  of  the 
generals  of  Alexander's  army,  returning  from  India,  brought  with 
him  specimens  of  the  ring-necked  parrakeet.  These  parrakeets,  which 
were  called  "Alexandrian  parrakeets,"  after  the  monarch  in  whose 
reign  they  were  introduced,  are  still  very  popular  with  bird-fanciers, 
and  are  so  common  in  India  that  sailors  continually  bring  them  to 
Europe  and  America.  They  are  docile,  and  while  slow  in  acquiring 
speech,  finally  make  excellent  talkers.  Roman  writers  inform  us  that 
they  were  not  eaten  in  India,  but  were  held  sacred  because  of  their 
ability  to  reproduce  human  speech. 

African  parrots  were  brought  to  Rome  in  the  time  of  Nero  from 
beyond  upper  Egypt,  where  they  had  been  discovered  by  explorers. 
They  were  highly  prized,  both  a^  pets  and  as  table  delicacies,  by  the 


CAGE-BIRD    TRAFFIC    OF    THE    UNITED    STATES.  175 

Romans,  who  kept  them  in  cages  of  tortoise-shell  and  ivory  with  silver 
wires,  and  often  paid  more  for  one  than  for  a  slave. 

The  earliest  knowledge  we  have  of  the  keeping  of  West  African 
parrots  as  pets  in  Europe  dates  back  to  1455,  when  Senegal  parrots 
were  first  introduced.  American  parrots  owe  their  introduction  into 
the  Old  World  to  Columbus,  who  carried  a  few  back  with  him  on  his 
return  from  his  first  voyage  to  America.  They  were  among  the 
objects  of  interest  when  he  made  his  formal  entry  into  Seville  on 
March  31,  1493.  Five  years  later  the  Portuguese  circumnavigated 
the  Cape  of  Good  Hope,  subjugated  a  part  of  India,  and  reintroduced 
the  Indian  parrots  into  Europe. 

The  most  popular  parrots  are  the  little  green  Australian  parrakeets, 
variously  known  as  shell  or  grass  parrakeets,  budgerigars,  or  love 
birds.  These  birds,  familiar  on  the  city  streets  in  the  capacity  of 
fortune-tellers  and  performers  of  tricks,  are  retailed  in  this  country 
at  $4  or  $5  a  pair.  They  are  among  the  easiest  of  all  foreign  birds  to 
breed  and  are  raised  in  large  numbers  in  Europe,  from  which  source 
come  many  of  the  birds  brought  to  the  United  States.  In  the  year 
ending  June  30, 1906,  we  imported  5,387  to  supply  the  demand,  includ- 
ing a  few  of  a  yellow  variety  produced  by  the  breeders  of  Belgium 
and  France.  Shell  parrakeets  are  easily  transported  from  Australia, 
owing  to  their  ability  to  exist  for  long  periods  without  water,  and 
have  frequently  been  carried  to  Europe  in  sailing  vessels,  making  a 
three  or  four  months'  vo}7age,  without  being  supplied  with  water. 

Cuban  parrots  have  recently  risen  in  favor  and  several  thousand 
were  needed  to  meet  the  year's  demand.  These  medium-sized  green, 
red,  and  blue  birds  with  whitish  crowns  make  fairly  good  talkers,  and 
sell  at  wholesale  for  $24  to  $27  a  dozen. 

Amazons  from  Mexico  and  Central  and  South  America,  which  aver- 
age $6  apiece  at  wholesale,  are  favorites  among  the  larger  parrots. 
They  are  known  as  blue-fronted,  red-fronted,  yellow  heads,  double- 
yellow  heads,  etc.,  according  to  the  markings  of  the  head.  The  blue- 
fronted  amazons  seem  to  be  preferred  in  Europe;  but  the  double- 
yellow  heads  make  the  best  talkers,  and  when  well  trained  command 
prices  ranging  as  high  as  several  hundred  dollars  apiece. 

The  African  gray  parrots  are  probably  unrivaled  in  ability  to  repro- 
duce human  speech,  and  have  been  popular  pets  in  Europe  since  the 
Middle  Ages.  Unfortunately  they  do  not  stand  transfer  very  well 
and  the  great  majority  of  the  few  imported  die  soon  after  arrival. 

The  larger  parrots  have  not  yet  learned  to  talk  when  they  arrive, 
and,  as  a  rule,  are  disposed  of  at  once  to  retailers.  By  these  they  are 
often  taught  by  means  of  specially  constructed  graphophones,  which 
automatically  repeat,  for  hours  at  a  time,  selected  words,  phrases,  or 
songs. 


176  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Parrots  often  attain  great  age — gray  pariots  have  been  known 
to  live  ninety  years.  They  display  affection  and  intelligence,  and 
make  very  interesting,  albeit  somewhat  noisy  pets.  They  should  be. 
allowed  frequent  liberty  from  the  cage  for  exercise,  where  it  is 
feasible:  and  they  are  much  pleased  and  benefited  by  simple  toys  with 
which  to  relieve  the  tedium  of  confinement — an  empty  spool,  a  piece 
of  tape  fastened  to  the  wire  of  the  cage,  or  some  similar  object. 

Macaws,  large  birds  with  glaring  reds,  blues,  yellows,  and  greens 
in  their  coloration  and  with  voices  to  match,  are  secured  in  tropical 
America:  a  few  lories  are  brought  from  the  Pacific  regions:  and  many 
cockatoos  from  Australia  and  neighboring  islands.  Of  the  last  the 
rose  cockatoo  from  the  Moluccas  -eems  to  be  preferred.  Nearly  300 
were  imported  during  the  year.  Both  macaws  and  cockatoos  are  diffi- 
cult to  handle.  Their  powerful  beaks  are  weapons  not  to  be  despised. 
and  are  used  so  freely  that  specially  strong  cages  and  perches  are 
needed  to  withstand  their  destructive  attack-.  Macaws  were  greatly 
prized  as  pets  by  the  Peruvians  before  the  Spanish  conquest. 

The  little  yellow-crested  cockateels  from  Australia  seem  to  win  less 

favor  here  than  in  England,  where  they  are  fairly  common  in  avia- 

while  but  30  or  40  seem  to  be  enough  to  supply  our  annual  needs. 

Thev  retail  here  at  $8  apiece  and  in  England  at  about  $2.50  a  pair,  a 

difference  in  price  that  may  partly  account  for  the  difference  in  favor. 

EUEOPEAN    BIRDS. 

The  European  birds  ordinarily  imported  are  sold  at  wholesale  for  $9 
a  dozen,  with  two  exceptions — siskins,  plain-colored  birds,  which  are 
usually  secured  for  crossiug  with  canaries  and  which  bring  only  £6  a 
dozen,  and  trained  or  "piping"  bullfinches,  which  command  $15  each. 
The  handsome  goldfinches  are  easily  first  in  popular  estimation.  a>  is 
shown  by  the  fact  that  5,000  are  annually  brought  in.  Of  bullfinches, 
'.  mostly  untrained,  entered  during  the  year.  More  than  a 
thousand  each-of  siskins  and  linnets  are  imported  each  year  and  several 
hundred  skylarks  and  chaffinches.  Song  thrushes,  blackbirds,  and 
black-caps  show  some  degree  of  popularity;  and  so  doubtless  would 
the  robin  redbreast — the  true  robin  of  our  nursery  tales  and  jingles — 
were  it  easier  to  keep  alive  in  confinement.  Nearly  a  hundred  night- 
ingales are  annually  brought  across  the  ocean,  but  very  few  ever  again 
utter  the  song  that  has  become  so  famous.  Their  silence  is  a  mute  but 
eloquent  protest  against  their  captivity,  and  serves  to  remind  us  that 
in  caging  a  bird  we  do  not  necessarily  cage  its  song. 

ORIENTAL    BIRDS. 

The  Orient  furnishes  several  of  the  most  popular  cage  birds — Java 
sparrows,  of  which  we  imported  6.285  in  the  year  ending  June  30, 1906; 


CAGE-BIRD    TRAFFIC    OF    THE    UNITED    STATES.  177 

Japanese  robins,  of  which  4,530  were  brought  in;  Japanese  nuns  of 
various  kinds,  which  aggregated  1,780;  and  strawberry  finches,  of  which 
1,280  were  needed  to  supply  the  demand. 

Java  sparrows,  also  known  as  paddy  or  rice  birds  because  of  their 
destructive  work  in  rice  fields,  are  hard}?-  and  breed  freely  in  captivity. 
Their  general  color  is  a  soft  bluish  gray,  set  off  by  the  red  bill  and 
conspicuous  white  marking  about  the  face.  A  white  variety  has 
been  produced  in  the  Orient.  These  retail  for  $3.50  each,  while  the 
grays  bring  only  $1.50  apiece.  Pure  whites  are  not  very  common — 
in  most  white  birds  more  or  less  of  the  blue-gray  appears.  Java 
sparrows  were  among  the  earliest  foreign  birds  imported  both  in  Europe 
and  the  United  States,  and  those  procured  for  the  trade  are,  like 
canaries,  chiefly  cage-bred  birds.  The  Japanese  now  breed  these 
birds  in  large  numbers.  In  order  to  increase  production  they  raise 
the  }Toung  by  hand,  feeding  them  with  a  sort  of  spoon  cut  from  a  thin 
bamboo  splint.  The  old  birds,  thus  relieved  of  the  care  of  their  young, 
are  free  to  breed  again  at  once. 

Japanese  robins,  usually  called  Pekin  nightingales  by  English  avi- 
culturists  (who  know  our  cardinals  as  Virginia  nightingales),  were 
imported  to  the  number  of  4,539.  They  are  peculiarly  colored — dark 
and  greenish  with  distinctive  3rellow  and  orange  on  breast,  bill,  and 
wings.  The\^  are  easy  to  keep,  possess  a  sweet  and  musical  song,  and 
have  a  song  period  of  ten  months,  which  contrasts  favorably  with  those 
of  most  cage-birds,  the  nightingale,  for  example,  which,  when  it  sings 
at  all,  is  in  song  for  only  two  months.  They  are  native  in  China,  Japan, 
and  India,  and  were  first  brought  to  England  about  1866  and  to  the 
United  States  ten  or  fifteen  years  later.     They  retail  at  $4  each. 

Nuns  are  small  birds  of  different  species,  such  as  the  black-headed, 
white-headed,  and  tricolored  nuns,  the  spicebird  or  chestnut  finch,  and 
others.  Most  of  them  have  more  or  less  dark  brown  in  the  coloring. 
A  pure  white  variety  and  a  buff  and  white  variet}7  of  one  species — the 
Japanese  nun,  also  known  as  bengalee  or  mannikin — bear  testimony  to 
the  assiduity  of  Japanese  breeders. 

An  attractive  singer  that  seems  to  be  growing  in  popularity  is  the 
shama  thrush  from  India.  Its  song  suggests  by  turns  those  of  catbird, 
bobolink,  and  brown  thrasher,  but  contains  some  clear  mellow  tones 
not  in  the  repertoire  of  those  singers. 

A  few  bulbuls  are  brought  from  India,  mainly  red-vented  bulbuls, 
but  including  other  kinds.  These  do  not  include,  however,  the  famous 
bulbul  of  Persia,  the  oriental  counterpart  of  the  European  nightingale, 
and  they  add  comparatively  little  to  the  total  number  of  songsters 
imported. 

The  hill  minas  of  India,  like  parrots,  can  be  taught  to  talk,  but  very 
few  are  imported.     These  retail  at  $17  apiece. 
3     A1906 12 


178  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


AFRICAN   UIKDS. 


Most  of  the  cage-birds  from  Africa,  which  are  brought  to  London, 
Liverpool,  Marseille,  Bordeaux,  and  other  European  ports  in  immense 
numbers,  are  secured  for  beauty  of  plumage,  not  song.  The  African 
weavers,  994  of  which  were  imported  during  the  year,  in  addition  to 
attractive  coloring  offer  an  interesting  exhibition  of  their  skill  in  the 
art  that  has  given  them  their  name.  At  nesting  time,  if  furnished  with 
worsted  or  other  suitable  material,  they  will  weave  this  in  and  out  of 
the  wires  of  their  cages,  making  neat  and  compact  examples  of  their 
handiwork.  Bishops  and  Madagascar  weavers  are  brilliant  red  and 
black  in  coloring,  cut-throats  have  a  band  of  red  across  the  throat, 
from  which  is  derived  the  name,  and  whidah  birds  (incorrectly  called 
"widow"  birds)  have  extremely  long  tails.  The  group  furnishes  an 
instance  in  which  one  family  contains  both  bishops  and  cut-throats. 
A  Napoleon  also  figures  among  its  members,  and  all  are  frequently 
associated  with  Japanese  nuns  and  Brazilian  cardinals. 

Waxbills  numbered  555  in  the  year's  importations.  These  include 
the  dainty  little  cordon  bleu,  or  crimson-eared  wTaxbill,  various  species 
of  silverbills,  and  several  other  kinds.  The  violet-eared  waxbill,  a 
bird  of  radiant,  prismatic  beauty,  is  brought  to  England,  but  has 
apparently  not  yet  come  to  the  United  States.  The  tin}-  zebra  finches, 
easy  to  keep  and  breeding  readily  in  captivity,  are  favorites  with  the 
bird-keeping  public,  591  coming  in  during  the  year.  African  siskins 
are  also  somewhat  popular,  and  a  small  but  increasing  number  of  edel- 
singers,  or  African  gray  singers,  one  of  the  few  African  species  that 
have  a  pleasing  song,  are  imported  annually. 

African  birds  generally  bring  $1.50  a  pair  at  wholesale.  Most  of 
them  have  light,  unmusical,  but  not  disagreeable,  notes,  and  being 
bright  and  active,  give  life  to  room  or  aviary  where  they  are  confined. 
While  the  breeding  time  of  most  of  them  is  during  our  winter  (the 
seasons  being  reversed  south  of  the  equator),  many  of  the  little  immi- 
grants adapt  themselves  readily  to  the  changed  conditions  and  breed 
in  the  summer  of  the  North  Temperate  Zone. 


AUSTRALIAN    BUUDS, 


Ordinary  Australian  birds  also  sell  for  $1.50  a  pair  wholesale.  Of 
these,  apart  from  shell  parrakcets,  diamond  sparrows  are  imported  in 
the.  largest  numbers,  the  year's  supply  being  332. 

Australia  is  notable,  however,  for  its  charming  Lady  Gould  finches, 
which,  perhaps,  reach  the  highest  point  of  beauty  and  elegance  attained 
by  any  of  the  smaller  cage-birds  of  the  world  (see  PL  IX).  Few  are 
sold  in  this  country,  possibly  because  of  their  high  price— $9  to  $10  a 
pair  at  wholesale — and  because  they  are  difficult  to  keep  (an  English 
fancier  says  of  them  that  they  suffer  all  the  ills  that  beset  other  cage- 
birds  and  several  special  ones  of  their  own).     They  are  highly  prized 


Yearbook  U.   5.   Dept.  of  Agriculture,    1906. 


Plate  IX. 


/ 


Lady  Gould  Finch. 


CAGE-BIRD    TRAFFIC    OF    THE    UNITED    STATES.  179 

in  England,  where  they  have  been  bred  a  number  of  times.  The  main 
reason  for  their  unusual  mortality  seems  to  be  improper  treatment. 
Because  they  come  from  the  warm  climate  of  Australia,  the}"  are 
usually  kept  where  they  have  plenty  of  sunlight.  As  a  matter  of  fact, 
however,  as  recently  pointed  out  by  a  writer  in  '"Bird  Notes,"  they 
inhabit  dense  scrub,  and  in  their  natural  habitat  avoid  the  direct  rays 
of  the  sun.  To  place  them  in  a  small  cage  in  the  sunlight  is  a  \ 
effective  method  of  destroying  them.  Lady  Gould  linches  are  attract- 
ive in  their  ways  as  well  as  in  appearance.  They  tame  readily,  are 
not  pugnacious  with  cage  mates,  and  exhibit  many  individualities  of 
disposition.  They  have  a  very  interesting  little  dance  that  sometimes 
forms  a  part  of  their  courtship. a 

Eir.D.S    FROM    SOUTH    AMERICA,     MEXICO,     AND    CUBA. 

Omitting  parrots,  gray  cardinals  are  the  principal  cage-birds 
imported  from  South  America.  In  England  these  vie  in  favor  with 
our  own  cardinal,  from  which  they  differ  in  being  gray  in  color,  with 
no  red  excepting  about  the  head.  During  the  last  fiscal  year  we 
imported  455,  which  were  retailed  at  ^3.50  each.  A  number  of  differ- 
ent species  of  small  birds  are  annually  brought  from  Mexico  and 
Cuba,  but  none  in  important  numbers  except  tomeguinos,  known  also 
as  grassquits  or  melodious  Cuban  linches  and  olive  Cuban  linches, 
according  to  species.  These  sell  for  $1.50  a  pair  wholesale,  and  665 
entered  during  the  year. 

BIRDS    BRED    IX    CAPTIVITY. 

In  Europe,  as  has  been  stated,  great  interest  is  manifested  in  breed- 
ing cage-birds.  This  interest  attaches  to  the  propagation,  not  only  of 
rare  birds,  but  of  niany  species  that  are  commonly  found  in  aviaries. 
There  is  a  great  difference  in  the  ease  with  which  birds  maj"  be  bred 
in  captivity.  Some,  such  as  shell  parrakeets,  zebra  finches,  Java  spar- 
rows, strawberry  finches,  and  our  own  bluebirds  and  indigo  birds,  breed 
readily  and  their  young  can  be  raised  without  much  difficulty.  But 
some  of  the  parrots  and  small  cage-birds  refuse  to  mate,  others  will 
not  sit  on  their  eggs,  and  others  yet  neglect  their  young.  To  breed 
such  species  requires  much  patience  and  ingenuity,  and  success  is  valued 
accordingly.  In  the  United  States,  where  bird-fanciers  are  few  and 
lack  association,  there  is  not  the  same  general  interest  in  the  breeding 
of  captive  birds.  Few  Oriental  birds  other  than  Java  sparrows  and 
but  few  of  the  small  cage-birds  from  Africa  and  Australia  have  been 
successfully  bred  in  the  United  States.  Among  the  more  important 
birds  that  have  been  reared  in  this  country  are  the  canary,  shell  par- 
rakeet,  black-crested  mina,  all-green  parrakcet.  gray  parrakeet,  cocka- 
teel,  graceful  ground-dove,  barred-shoulder  dove,  zebra  finch,  white 

a  See  a  detailed  account  of  this  dance  by  Captain  Perreau  in  "Bird  Notes"  for 
November,  1905,  Vol.  IV.  No.  8,  p.  203. 


ISO  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Java  sparrow,  gray  Java  sparrow,  cut-throat  finch,  and  saffron  finch. 
Some  hybrids  have  been  produced  by  breeding  canaries  with  gold- 
finches, linnets,  and  other  birds,  thus  securing  well-known  and  greatly 
valued  mules. 

OPPORTUNITY   FOR    AMERICAN    ENTERPRISE. 

The  large  and  rapidly  growing  demand  for  canaries  and  other  cage- 
birds  that  has  sprung  up  in  the  United  States  and  that  is  now  satisfied 
by  importations  from  abroad  suggests  the  possibility  of  establishing 
the  industry  of  raising  birds  for  market  on  this  side  of  the  Atlantic. 
It  is  more  than  likely  that  interest  in  the  keeping  of  cage-birds  will 
continue  to  spread,  and  that  its  growth  will  result  in  the  development 
of  societies,  periodicals,  annual  shows,  and  other  features  that  mark 
it-  advance  in  Europe.  Breeding  canaries  for  market  brings,  as  has 
been  shown,  several  hundred  thousand  dollars  annually  to  the  peasants 
of  the  Harz  Mountains  of  Germany,  canaries  of  fancy  shapes  that  com- 
mand high  prices  are  regularly  bred  in  England.  Scotland.  Belgium,  and 
other  countries:  and  it  is  important  to  note  that  in  nearly  every  instance 
the  pursuit  is  carried  on  as  an  adjunct  to  some  other  occupation.  There 
is  no  reason  why  the  American  market  should  not  be  supplied  by 
American  breeders.  The  need  already  exists:  imported  birds  are  not 
so  well  adapted  to  our  climate  as  those  raised  here,  and  home  produc- 
tion would  obviate  the  large  losses  incident  to  the  ocean  voyage. 

Many  difficulties  must  be  met.  Captive  birds  are  subject  to  numer- 
ous diseases  and.  under  the  most  favorable  circumstances,  require 
careful  treatment.  Attention  to  diet  is  important,  particularly  in  the 
case  of  soft-billed  birds,  whose  food  is  chierly  insects.  Questions  of 
suitable  temperature  for  aviaries,  of  securing  sufficient  open-air  exer- 
cise without  undue  exposure,  of  preventing  destruction  of  birds  or 
their  eggs  by  cage-mates,  of  inducing  birds  to  breed,  and  many  other 
problems  constantly  tax  the  patience  and  skill  of  the  aviculturist:  and 
owing  to  climatic  differences  between  Europe  and  America  many  of 
the<e  questions  would  doubtless  have  to  be  settled  anew. 

But  American  ingenuity  and  energy  should  be  able  to  meet  and 
overcome  all  obstacles  and  establish  the  business  on  a  paying  basis. 
Due  weight  should  be  given  the  fact  that  the  experiment  requires 
little  capital.  It  can  easily  be  started  at  small  expense  and  extended 
only  as  the  profits  justify  extension.  The  field  i-  a  promising  one. 
The  success  attending  cage-bird  breeding  in  Europe,  the  great  demand 
for  birds  as  pets  in  this  country  revealed  by  our  large  importations, 
the  superior  value  of  those  bred  in  America,  and  the  facility  with 
which  the  business  can  be  established  and  maintained  offer  strong 
inducements  to  American  enterprise. 


THE  USE  OF  SOIL  SURVEYS. 

By  J.  A.  Box  steel, 
In  Charge  of  Soil  Survey,  Bureau,  of  Soils. 

The  soil  of  the  United  States  constitutes  the  one  great  inexhaustible 
natural  resource  of  the  country;  from  it  spring  not  only  the  food  and 
raiment  of  the  people,  but  nearly  one-half  (42  per  cent)  of  the  mate- 
rials used  in  manufacture  and  a  majority  of  the  materials  exchanged 
in  commerce.  From  the  soil,  in  the  present  generation,  the  farmers 
of  the  United  States  have  won  a  living  for  themselves  and  for  their 
countrymen,  and  in  addition  have  furnished  the  commodities  whose 
sale  and  exchange  have  much  reduced  the  dependence  of  this  country 
upon  the  capital  of  foreign  nations. 

SMALL    PROPORTION    OF    LAXD    UNDER    TILLAGE. 

The  agricultural  domain  of  the  United  States  (exclusive  of  the 
outlying  possessions)  in  1900  comprised  5,739,657  farms,  aggregating 
841,201,546  acres.  Of  this  area  almost  exactly  one-half  is  improved 
land  and  the  remainder  consists  of  woodlots,  swamps,  and  land  that 
has  never  been  plowed  or  cropped.  Although  this  is  a  great  total, 
less  than  one-half  of  the  whole  land  area  has  been  turned  into  farms, 
and  less  than  one-fifth  is  actually  improved.  Even  upon  this  show- 
ing the  farm  lands  of  the  United  States  comprise  seven  times  the 
farm-land  area  of  France,  with  39  million  people;  eight  times  the 
farm-land  area  of  Germany,  with  60  million  people;  and  thirty-one 
times  the  farm-land  area  of  England  and  Wales,  with  34  million  peo- 
ple. The  American  farms  now  existing  could  be  made  to  produce 
enough  to  feed  many  times  the  country's  present  population  were 
the  best  and  most  intensive  agricultural  methods  of  European  coun- 
tries applied,  and  still  have  a  surplus  for  export. 

It  is  to  the  full  development  of  these  vast  but  dormant  resources 
that  the  soil-survey  work  is  devoted. 

SOIL    RESOURCES    MAY    BE    GREATLY    INCREASED. 

The  soil  itself  is  not  a  fixed  and  generally  decreasing  source  of 
income,  as  are  many  of  the  other  natural  resources  of  the  country. 
The  wealth  of  the  soil  may  not  properly  be  compared  with  a  fixed 
bank  account  upon  which  drafts  in  the  form  of  crops  are  continuously 

181 


182  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

drawn  with  the  ultimate  result  of  the  complete  exhaustion  of  the 
capital  involved.  The  suil  is  more  nearly  comparable  with  an 
invested  fund  whose  annual  interest  is  paid  in  the  form  of  crops  and 
which,  under  proper  management,  may  be  continually  increased  from 
its  annual  earnings.  The  forces  of  nature  which  have  produced  soils 
have  not  ceased  to  act.  and  through  their  steady,  continued  operations 
they  are  capable  of  maintaining  and  renewing  the  producing  power  of 
this   great    natural   resource    when   they   are   properly   directed   and 

sted  by  the  husbandman.  In  tins  respect  soils,  as  a  natural 
resource,  differ  most  materially  from  mines.  The  mine  of  metal  or  of 
mineral  fuel  constitutes  a  resource  whose  extent  may  be  ascertained 
and  whose  total  content  may  be  measured.  It  is  possible  under 
certain  conditions  for  skillful  engineers  to  estimate  with  considerable 
exactness  the  total  amount  of  material  which  may  be  removed  from  a 
mine  and  the  length  of  time  which  it  will  continue  to  yield.  With  the 
soil  this  is  n^t  possible.  Even  where  surface  soils  are  bodily  removed 
and  use]  -     -  are  exposed,  these,  if  only  left  to  nature,  may  in 

time  be  brought   to  useful  productivity:    when   nature  is  properly 

-ted  the  process  becomes  rapid.  When  through  mismanagement 
the  crop-producing  power  of  a  soil  is  impaired,  a  simple  change  in 
crop  rotation  or  in  the  mechanical  handling  of  the  soil  is  often  suffi- 
cient to  make  its  continued  cultivation  possible  and  profitable.  Thus 
the  soil,  under  businesslike  and  scientific  management,  is  capable  of 
yielding  not  only  annual  but  annually  increasing  profits.  While 
management,  neglect,  or  avarice  may  cause  a  temporary  check  in  the 
producing  capacity  of  the  individual  field,  hi- 

prove  that,  in  all  civilized  countries,  through  all  historic  times, 
soils  of  the  world  have  re  .-ponded  with  increased  crops  increasi] 
intensive  culture  for  the  support  of  growing  It  is  only 

within  brief  periods  of  time  and  over  limited  areas  that  improvio 
or  neglect  has  been  able  to  cause  decreased  returns  from  the  - 

The  time  has  not  yet  arrived  when  even  the  present  kn  >wn  resources 
of  Americas  soils  are  fully  called  upon  to  feed  the  p-. 
nation.     Xo  such  intensity  ol  cultivation  is  demanded  as  in  Germany, 
where  the  average  farm  comprises  V,  -r  in  France,  where  it  is 

34  a<  in  England  and  Wales,  where  it  is  63.4  acres.     In 

the  United  States  land  is  still  so  abundant  that  the  average  farm 
tains  14G.2  acres  and  less  than  half  of  it  is  improved.  The  time  may 
some  day  come,  and  doubtless  will — it  may  be  when  there  are  300 
millions  of  Americans  instead  of  85  millions — when  more  land  will  be 
needed  for  farms.  Much  sooner  will  come  a  time  when  the  farm  land 
now  in  use  must  be  handled  more  intensively  and  more  effectively 
and  each  acre  must  be  made  to  produce  to  its  maximum  capacity  the 
crops  for  which  it  is  best  fitted. 


THE    USE    OF    SOIL    SURVEYS.  1S3 

STUDY    OF    LARGE    PROBLEMS. 

It  is  partly  in  anticipation  of  that  time  that  the  soil  survey  is 
examining  into  the  total  soil  resources  of  the  country  and  investigat- 
ing the  broad  problems  of  the  relationship  of  soil  to  crop,  which  must 
be  solved  before  American  soils  and  American  farmers  can  do  their 
best,  the  one  for  the  other.  In  crop  production,  even  under  ordinary 
farm  methods,  there  are  two  groups  of  influences  which  control  the 
selection  of  appropriate  crops — the  planning  of  crop  rotations  and  the 
adoption  of  correct  systems  of  farming.  These  are  the  influences  of 
the  climate  and  the  soil.  Neither  may  be  neglected  by  any  man  who 
hopes  for  complete  success,  and  the  due  and  relative  importance  of 
each  must  be  ascertained. 

EXTENT  OF  SURVEYS  ALREADY  MADE. 

The  work  of  making  soil  surveys  was  began  in  1S99.  and  by  June  30. 
100(3.  an  aggregate  area  of  rJ8,886  square  miles,  or  75,959,865  acres, 
had  been  mapped.  This  comprises  something  less  than  one-tenth  of 
the  area  actually  in  farms  and  about  one  twenty-fifth  of  the  entire 
area  of  the  United  States.  These  surveys  have  been  made  in  43 
States  and  4  Territories.  They  have  been  so  distributed  as  to 
constitute  numerous  studies  of  each  important  geographical  and 
agricultural  district. 

SOIL    TYPES.   SERIES,  AND    PROVINCE-. 

The  work  of  the  soil  survey  is  based  upon  the  principle  that  there 
are  differences  among  soils  which  so  affect  plants  that  not  all  soils  are 
equally  suited  to  the  production  of  all  crops.  This  work,  therefore, 
comprises  a  study  of  both  the  character  of  these  soil  differences  and 
the  effects  which  they  produce  in  the  growing  of  farm  crops. 

In  the  field  work  of  the  soil  survey  the  soils  are  studied  to  determine 
their  texture,  or  the  relative  amounts  of  coarse  or  fine  particles  of 
which  they  consist:  their  structure,  or  the  relationship  of  these  parti- 
cles one  to  the  others:  their  organic  matter  content,  both  quantity 
and  distribution:  their  internal  natural  drainage,  and  their  topo- 
graphic relief.  These  factors  operating  together  determine  the  char- 
acter of  the  home  which  plants  are  to  find  in  the  soil.  All  masses  or 
areas  of  soil  which  are  found  to  be  closely  similar  in  all  of  these 
respects  are  said  to  belong  to  the  same  soil  type.  Under  similar 
climatic  surroundings  the  type  is  capable  of  producing  similar  kinds 
of  crops,  and  under  the  same  conditions  of  farm  management  and  of 
farm  efficiency  they  may  be  expected  to  produce  practically  equiva- 
lent amounts  of  crops. 

It  has  also  been  found  that  several  soil  types  in  a  given  region  may 
differ  only  in  their  texture,  being  identical  or  similar  in  all  other 


184  -3BOOK  o*  r::z  department  of  agricultuee. 

resp  S  ich  a  group  of  soils     -   called  a  series.     Again,  several 

series  have  been  found  to  be  derived  from  the  same  cl  material 

by  similar  processes  and  to  exist  in  a  region  having  similar  climatic 
features  in  the  broadest   sense.     Such   a  region  constitutes 
province. 

PES. 

The  soil  survey  recognizes  at  present  13  gre  3,  58  soil 

series,  and  461  soil  types.     Of  these  types  some  130  are  more  oi 
local  in  character,  while  the  remainder  are  of  widespread  occurrence 
within  their  respective  provinces.     For  example,  the  Norfolk  sand  is 
a  warm,  porous  soil  of  the  Atlantic  and  Gulf  Coastal  Plain  Province, 
suited  to  the  production  of  truck  een  mapped 

in  34  different  areas,  located  in  14  States,  extend     a  Eng- 

land to  The  total  area  covered  by  this  in  the  areas 

mapped    amounts    to    1.702,000    ac:  _  s   uare  miles.     Its 

extent  within  the  total  area  of  these  14  States  is  many  times  as  great. 
Throughout  the  region  where  it  occurs  this  soil  has  a  definite  crop 
adaptation,  and  the  variety  of  crops  which  may  be  raised  sucessfully 
upon  it  is  limited  by  nature. 

Similarly  the  Marshall  silt  loam  has  been  mapped  in  22  ar 
located  in  9  differen:  -  n  extent  of       _  s,  or  6,126 

square  miles.  It  is  again  safe  to  say  that  within  these  States  several 
times  as  many  acres  exist  as  have  been  mapped.  Seven-eighths  of 
the  area  of  this  soil  is  preeminently  adapted  to  corn  production,  and 
the  remaining  one-eighth,  while  under  climatic  surroundings  unfavor- 
able to  corn,  is  well  suited  to  the  production  of  one  or  more  other  a 
of  equal  value. 

Although  these  two  types  of  soil  are  extreme  cases,  they  are  by  no 
means  the  only  valuable  soils  of  wide  distribution  and  well-recog- 
nized crop  adaptation.  Among  the  other  459  types  then  me  of 
which  areas  as  large  as  the  small  5  -  have  already  been  mapped. 
There  are  others  of  which  areas  scarcely  larger  than  a  single  town- 
ship have  so  far  been  encountered  and  mapped.  Whether  exten- 
or  limite'd  in  area,  each  pre-  -  and  no  two 
could  safely  be  classed  together  as  possessing  identical  properties  and 
the  same  utility. 

ADAPT.  SOILS. 

Enough  has  been  said  to  demonstrate  the  wide  range  and  the  won- 
derful richness  of  the  soil  resources  of  the  country.  The  other  prob- 
lem of  equal  importance,  possibly  the  greatest  agricultural  problem  of 
the  nation  as  a  whole,  is  that  of  the  proper  and  complete  development 
of  these  resources  along  lines  which  shall  give  not  only  increased  crop 
values,  but  also  increasing  ability  to  produce  crops  upon  the  part  of  the 
soils. 


THE    USE    OF    SOIL,    SURVEYS.  1S5 

Careful  consideration  must  be  given  to  the  fact  that  at  least  461  types 
of  soil  possessing  distinctive  properties  are  already  known  to  exist.  It 
rests  with  some  one,  whether  a  private  individual  or  a  public  official, 
to  determine  the  crop  or  crops  to  which  each  one  of  these  soils  is  best 
adapted;  to  devise  the  methods  of  soil  management  by  which  each 
one  of  these  soils  may  be  made  to  produce  a  sufficient  crop  to  repay  all 
expenses  and  to  render  a  profit ;  to  adapt  the  systems  of  farm  economy 
through  crop  rotations,  tillage,  and  fertilization  so  that  these  different 
soils  may  produce  their  crops  for  long  periods  of  time  at  least  without 
deterioration  and.  if  American  farming  is  to  become  a  science,  with 
actual  increase  in  crop-producing  power. 

Moreover,  it  is  necessary  that  the  discovery,  introduction,  and  cul- 
ture of  crops  adapted  to  these  various  types  shall  follow  such  lines 
that  the  greatest  food  values  as  well  as  the  highest  commercial  values 
shall  be  rendered  by  each  soil.  It  is  also  a  necessity  that  upon 
widely  extended  types  such  crops  shall  be  grown  as  are  subject  to 
wide  demand  in  the  markets  of  the  world.  Otherwise  the  farmers 
engaged  in  crop  production  must  face  a  destructive  competition  or 
else  portions  of  the  soil  type  must  be  neglected  or  but  feebly  utilized. 
One  may  anticipate  the  time  when  all  areas  of  Norfolk  sand  having 
suitable  climatic  conditions  and  transportation  facilities  can  be  made  to 
produce  great  crops  of  those  vegetables  which  now  constitute  winter 
luxuries  for  the  few.  At  the  present  day  such  widespread  produc- 
tion, coupled  with  a  limited  demand,  would  force  prices  to  a  point 
where  the  returns  from  the  crop  would  only  pay  the  charges  of  trans- 
portation and  of  retailing  and  the  producer  would  be  left  with  neither 
expenses  nor  profits  paid.  Therefore,  before  such  anticipations  can  be 
realized,  either  demand  must  increase,  as  it  will  with  increasing  popu- 
lation and  individual  wealth,  or  transportation  costs  must  diminish, 
as  they  also  will  with  the  progress  of  invention  and  a  proper  increase 
in  competition. 

The  soil-survey  work  thus  possesses  a  dual  aspect:  (1)  It  must  deal 
with  those  problems  of  crop  and  soil  adaptation  which  concern  the 
present  individuals  and  generation;  and  (2)  it  must  accumulate  a 
fund  of  information  in  regard  to  soils  which  will  assist  in  solving  the 
broad  problems  of  the  nation's  soil  resources  and  the  utilization  of 
these  resources,  not  only  for  the  support  of  a  growing  population,  but 
also  for  maintaining  a  favorable  balance  of  trade  for  the  nation. 

REPORTS    OX    ACTUAL    USES    OF    SOILS. 

The  individual  report  upon  each  soil-survey  area  contains  an 
account  of  each  soil  type  within  the  area.  It  gives  a  description  of 
the  characteristic  appearance  of  the  type  and  summarizes  the  crop 
uses  to  which  it  is  put  within  the  area.  The  methods  of  handling  the 
soil  are  given,  and  a  general  statement  is  also  made  of  the  range  of 


1S6  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPABTMESl  iBICUI/TUKE. 

crop  production.     Such,  a  report  summarizes  the  actual  uses  of  the 

ed  limits,  and  it  also  summarizes  the  farm 
practices  in  ~  Each. report  also  contains  an  account  of 

the  in  othe.  -here  the  same  tvpe  of  soil  has  been 

encountered:  ai.  -  new  crops,  new  methods  of  soil 

management,  and  new  industries  are  made  a  f  this  wider 

knv  i    -ecuredfroni  mi::,  vs. 

PBESEXT    USES  ES. 

se  reports  on  soil  surveys  the  individual  farmer  may  1 
the  relationships  of  the  soils  upon  his  own  farm.  : 

in  the  immediate  neighborhood,  but  to  sons  of  the  same  character 
in  widel;  :edregi-:.~.     He  may  tl.  st tidy  under- 

standingly  the  methods  and  results  obtained  under  the  most  ft 
conditions  1;  -sful  farmers  upon  -  :i  of 

:vation  is  e::      i  nd  he  may  more  surely  be  experience 

ion  of  others  to  his  owr.  1  condi- 

-  able  to  wnfarm.n'  :edprop 

nship  to  other  farml- 
and in  a  re-_ 

iiidividiu  .me  of  a 

fixf  a. 

the  pr.  -  -  of  the  com. 

there  is  slang  ease 

new  :  general 

agriculture  or  for  the  production  of  special  crops.     Inquir 
person 

•h  will  enable  him  tb  compare  c. 
Uy  kn<  -a  ikies  m 

::.     Inq  re  are  c  received  at  the 

V  ;  artment  of  Agriculture,  and  wherever  possible  the  infori 
supplied  by  the  reports  and  maps  covering  the  a:  erned. 

or  that  is  conin:  he  information  v 

h  a  judgment  may  be  based.     The  -      - 

i  means  d  to  rep 

r  newly  ope:  -rieultnral  occupation. 

■     i    - 
calling  the  attention  of  individual  farm  Jar  loc; 

the  older  States    where  possible  advantages  may  be  gained  from  the 
-d  lands  and  the  purchase  of  others  which,  for  the 
time,  aire  offered  t  figure.     Gi 

during  the  past  :  _         .s  in  the 

■m  and  -       '  States     nn  for  those  in  any  o^ier  local: 

n  of  individuals  and  of  investors  is 
oekj  shown  bv  this  demand. 


THE    USE    OF    SOIL    SURVEYS.  187 

During  the  past  decade  the  funds  accumulated  by  large  invi  slment 
companies  have  increasingly  sought  a  farm-land  outlet.  The  soil- 
survey  reports  are  regularly  requested  by  many  such  companies. 
Some  only  desire  the  reports  in  particular  circumscribed  regions. 
Others  desire  these  reports  as  an  unprejudiced  basis  upon  which  a 
judgment  of  land  uses  and  of  farm  development  in  widespread  and 
remote  regions  may  be  based.  Obviously,  the  common  interest  of  the 
entire  community  is  served  by  these  reports  of  soil  facts,  just  as  the 
individual  interests  of  the  persons  concerned  are  safeguarded  at  the 
same  time. 

The  use  of  the  soil-survey  maps  and  reports  by  educational  institu- 
tions has  greatly  increased  within  a  few  years,  accompanying  a 
renewed  activity  in  the  study  of  soils  and  in  the  teaching  of  soil  sub- 
jects. Not  only  are  the  maps  and  reports  used  by  those  institutions 
directly  for  the  study  of  soils,  but  they  are  also  used  in  studies  of  crop 
production,  of  farm  economics,  and  of  the  distribution  of  agricultural 
products.  Xonagricultural  colleges  and  universities  are  also  using 
these  reports  in  connection  with  courses  in  commercial  geography. 
It  has  thus  become  necessary  to  hold  such  uses  in  mind  in  the  distri- 
bution of  the  individual  soil-survey  reports  and  of  the  annual  report 
known  as  Field  Operations  of  the  Bureau  of  Soils. 

FUTURE  NEED  FOR  EXACT  INFORMATION. 

All  of  these  uses  of  soil  maps  and  of  soil-survey  reports  are  imme- 
diate and  present.  They  are  more  or  less  personal  to  the  individual 
farmer,  investor,  or  student.  They  do  not  constitute  the  only  use 
nor  possibly  the  greatest  use  of  these  surveys.  As  agriculture,  based 
on  the  soil  as  its  fundamental  resource,  is  the  greatest  business  of  the 
country  at  the  present  time,  so  it  must  remain  for  many  generations 
to  come.  Agriculture  is  still  a  generalized  business,  although  its 
specialization  into  horticulture,  market  gardening,  tobacco  culture, 
cotton  culture,  and  other  subdivisions  has  begun.  With  increasing 
population,  with  greater  intensity  of  cultivation,  greater  demands 
will  continually  be  made  upon  the  soil  and  greater  precision  and  skill 
in  the  selection  and  handling  of  soils  for  special  crops  will  be  required. 
It  will  be  extravagantly  wasteful  to  allow  these  developments  to  occur 
along  the  lines  of  chance  and  to  secure  the  ultimate  ends  as  the  result 
of  haphazard  trial  or  experimentation.  The  soil  and  climatic  factors 
which  goA*ern  plant  and  crop  growth  must  be  understood  and  appre- 
ciated. Whenever  through  any  cause  a  particularly  valuable  crop 
is  brought  to  perfection  upon  a  given  soil,  the  extent  and  geographic 
distribution  and  the  climatic  environment  of  that  soil  must  be  known 
in  order  to  insure  the  successful  spread  of  its  culture. 

Even  at  the  present  day  there  is  continual  inquiry  as  to  the  soil 
conditions  under  which  specific  crops  may  be  successfully  grown,  and 


188  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    A4TOIC1ILTUBE. 

crops  formerly  confined  to  na:  jions  are  spreading  to  other  locali- 

se culture  of  alfalfa,  the  production  of  sugar  beets,  the  intro- 
duction of  new  varic  tobacco oi  of  old  varieties  into  new  regions. 
all  illustrate  this  tendency.  Discussions  of  soils  in  connection  with 
the  great  staple  crops  are  usually  confined  to  corn  soils,  wheat  soils. 
>r  grass  -  -  Little  attention  is  paid  to  the  pertinent 
fact  that  each  of  these  crops  has  developed  well-marked  varieties 
I  to  quite  different  regions,  climates,  and  soils.  It  has  become 
nece—  ly  not  toba<  s  ils,  but  cigar-wrapper  tobacco  soils 
or  cigar-filler  to1:  -  Us.  This  is  rec  _•:..;:  The  equally  impor- 
tant fact  that  corn  and  wheat,  cotton,  rice,  and  the  other  great  staples 
should  be  studied  as  varieties  adapted  to  different  kinds  of  soil  has 
een  equally  emphasized. 
From  the  stuc  i  .  ?rican  soil  difference  -  .  adaptations,  and 
soil  resources,  and  h  .  mg-continu  vat  ion.  classification, 
and  correlation  of  soil  and  crop  f  ts  ascertained  by  the  spe- 
cialist new  ses,  now  unperceived.  of  each  and  every  acre  of  agricul- 
tural land,  so  th  will  no  longer  report  less  than  one-half  of 
the  land  of  the  country  apportioned  into  farms  and  less  than  one-fifth 
actually  improved  and  tilled.  From  these  studies  and  from  the  devel- 
opment of  la  -  :  -  nd  plant  -  iation  it  will  undoubtedly  be 
possible,  at  some  future  day,  to  increase  the  number  of  great  staple 
crops  from  as  lozen  to  several  score,  each  occupying  its  proper 
place  in  the  farm  economy  of  the  country  and  each  produced  under 
those  circumsl          a     f  soil  and  climate  best  fitted  to  its  growth. 

ither  problems,  even  now  appearing  in  American  agricul- 
ture, of  the  rehabilitation  of  so-called  "worn-out"  and  abandoned 
farms,  of  maintaining  and  even  increasing  the  producing  capacity  of 
broad  areas,  while  they  are  probably  economic  and  farm-management 
problem-  I  nsiderable  extent,  are  only  capable  of  solution  after  a 

thorough  study  of  th  iditions  in  the  field.     These  problems  may 

not  -  outlined  without  the  aid  of  soil-survey  work:  much  less 

can  they  ed. 

le  time  has  come  in  the  agricultural  development  of  the  United 
$  irate  and  detailed  knowledge  of  the  soil — its  charac- 

ter, -        viabilities,  and  adaptati  >f  great  importance; 

and  as  the  years  go  by  such  knowledge  will  become  more  and  more 
important,  until  ultimately  our  greatly  increased  population  will  need 
and  will  be  able  to  utilize  fully  the  diverse  capabilities  of  these  401 
different  types  of  soil. 


BIRDS  THAT  EAT  SCALE  INSECTS. 

By  W.  L.  McAtee. 
Assistant,  Biological  Survey. 

IXTEODUCTIOX. 

The  importance  of  birds  to  the  farmer  in  his  warfare  against  insects 
is  everywhere  recognized;  indeed,  it  maybe  said  that  successful  agri- 
culture would  be  well-nigh  impossible  without  their  aid.  One 
important  role,  however,  is  filled  by  birds,  in  which  the  value  of  their 
services  has  not  been  appreciated,  chiefly,  no  doubt,  because  the  facts 
are  not  generally  known.  This  is  as  destroyers  of  scale  insects.  Very 
little  has  been  published  on  the  subject,  although  at  least  six  foreign 
species  and  about  the  same  number  of  native  ones  have  been  reported 
as  feeding  upon  scales.  These  facts  have  been  either  overlooked  or 
little  weight  has  been  attached  to  them.  Indeed,  only  recently  cur- 
rency has  been  given  to  a  statement  that  birds  never  feed  upon  scales. 
Xot  only  is  this  statement  not  true,  but  investigations  by  the  Biologi- 
cal Survey  prove  conclusively  that  scales  are  eaten  by  many  species 
of  birds  and  that  with  some  species  they  are  a  favorite  food. 

DAMAGE    TO    TREES    AXD    CROPS    BY    SCALE    IXSECTS. 

Before  attempting  to  estimate  the  value  of  the  services  of  birds  in 
reducing  the  number  of  scale  insects,  it  will  be  well  to  review  briefly 
the  nature  and  extent  of  the  damage  inflicted  by  these  pests.  Many 
authorities  class  the  scales  among  the  most  destructive  of  insects. 
They  have  caused  the  loss  of  hundreds  of  valuable  orchards  and  are 
dreaded  by  the  horticulturist  above  all  other  insects,  being  especiallv 
feared  because  of  the  insidiousness  of  their  attack.  When  present  in 
small  numbers  they  are  easily  overlooked  and  thus  may  become  nrmly 
established  in  an  orchard  before  their  presence  is  detected. 

When  young  and  still  more  or  less  active,  scale  insects  are  carried 
from  tree  to  tree  by  numerous  agencies,  and  hence  spread  with  great 
rapidity.  When  adult  they  firmly  attach  themselves  to  the  plant. 
upon  the  sap  of  winch  they  feed,  and  then  combined  attacks  gradually 
reduce  its  vitality  till  finally  death  ensues.  Many  varieties  of  plants 
are  infested  by  them,  and  often  large  trees  are  completely  incrusted 
by  a  mass  of  scales  composed  of  hundreds  of  thousands  of  individuals. 
Even  perfectly  healthy  trees  do  not  survive  the  attacks  of  these 
minute  pests  more  than  two  or  three  years. 

'     1S9 


190  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT!    01  DT.TUBE. 

In  such  extreme  cases  all  methods  of  relief  generally  fail,  and  when 
once  the  vigor  of  a  tree  is  seriously  impaired  by  scales  there  i-  no 
remedy.  The  old  growth  must  be  cut  down  and  burned  and  new  stock 
introduced.  In  most  instances  of  scale  attack,  however,  the  problem 
is  less  serious,  and  \  suppressive  measures  are  effectual.     It  is 

during  the  lighter  infestations  that  the  controlling  power  of  natural 
•enemies  of  the  scale  is  most  apparent. 

NATURAE    ENEMIES    OF    SCALE    INSECTS. 

In. extreme  cases  of  infestation  by  scales  their  natural  enemies  are 
rarely  able  to  control  them,  at  least  until  the  insects  have  done  much 
damage.  The  greatest  value,  therefore,  of  the  natural  enemies  of 
scales  is  in  preventing  undue  increase  of  the  insects,  in  restraining 
them  within  what  may  be  termed  natural  bounds,  when  the  harm  they 
do  is  comparatively  of  little  moment. 

As  an  example  of  a  species  usually  harmless  but  occasionally  inc: 
ing  beyond  the  limit  of  safety,  the  plum  scale  {Eidecarmim  ■ 
maybe  cited.     Of  this  species  Lugger,  in  a  report  on  Minnesota  ins 
says:  "This  is  usually  an  uncommon  species,  but  is  now  found  in 
destructive  numbers,  not  alone  upon  the  cherry,  but  also  more  fre- 
quently upon  the  plum:  though  apples,  pears,  and  other  trees  do  not 
escape."0 

The  plum  scale  is  injurious  also  in  Xew  York,  but  in  many  parts  of 
its  range  it  is  not  numerous  enough  to  be  a  pest,  which  indicates  that 
in  tl  enemies  have  been  able  to  hold  it  in  check  and 

a  maintain  the  balance.  This  is  the  ideal  state.  Under  primitive 
conditions  a  balance  among  organisms,  both  animal  and  vegetable, 
quent  and  more  stable  than  it  now  is.  when  man's  inter- 
ference with  the  operation  of  natural  laws,  desta  cies 
and  protecting  and  propagating  others,  constantly  disturbs  the  equi- 
librium. 

Owing  to  various  changes,  among  the  most  important  of  which  has 
been  the  importation  of  unlimited  numbers  of  foreign  scales,  which 
a  time  at  least,  have  enjoy  t  i  entire  immunity  from  natural 

enemies,  the  balance  between  scale  insects  and  their  enemies  has  been 
most  seriously  affected,  and  th  have  increased  enormo 

Hence  in  attempting  to  reduce  the   numbers  of  scale  insects  « \ 
effort  should  be  made  to  foster  their  natural  enem 

For  the  purpose  of  considering  their  economic  value,  the  latter  i 

be  divided  into  two  groups — the  parasitic  and  the  predaceous  eneo 

fectively  do  the  n  great  part  minute  Hymenopt 

iwaragj  ales  that  they  sometimes  destroy  not  lesathfl 

per  cent  of  the  j  _  ether  with  then  eggs.     Neverth  has 

been  stated  by  Dr.  L.  O.  Howard,  "'it  is  perfectly  obvious  that  these 

a  Bui.  69,  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Univ.  of  Minn.,  p.  217,  1900. 


BIRDS    THAT    EAT    SCALE    INSECTS.  191 

parasites  wiU  not  accomplish  complete  extermination."  However 
they  do  not  have  to  fight  the  battle  alone,  for  as  allies  they  have  the 
group  of  predaceous  enemies  which  comprises  beetle-,  svrphus  and 
lace-wing  Mies,  and  true  bugs  among  insects,  and  also  mites,  birds, 
and  mammals.  Among  these,  beetles  are  undoubtedly  the  most  im- 
portant. Coccinellid  beetles,  or  ladybirds,  of  many  species  feed  upon 
the  scale  insects,  and  in  their  ranks  are  the  most  successful  destroyers 
of  scales  known.  One  of  them  almost  completely  exterminated  the 
cottony  cushion  scale,  formerly  the  most  destructive  insect  of  its 
kind  in  California. 

Mammals  may  be  dismissed  in  this  connection  with  the  statement 
that  so  far  as  known  they  count  for  but  little  in  the  warfare  against 
scales:  one  instance  is  known  of  mice  devouring  the  Lecanium  scales 
from  a  peach  tree  in  England. 

-  was  noted  in  the  introduction,  comparatively  little  has  found  its 
way  into  print  as  to  the  part  birds  play  as  destroyers  of  scale  insects. 
Among  the  most  interesting  published  observations  on  this  point  are 
th^se  of  R.  Xewstead,  Chester.  England.'7  He  mentions  four  scale 
insects  which  were  preyed  upon  by  five  species  of  birds,  and  it  is  to  be 
noted  that  two  of  the  scales  and  two  of  the  birds  are  identical  with 
species  occurring  in  the  United  States.  The  house  sparrow  was  found 
apparently  feeding  upon  the  hawthorn  scale  (Eulecawmm  genevense), 
which  occurs  only  in  Europe.  Another  scale  insect,  nevertheless, 
and  an  injurious  one.  the  oyster-shell  bark-louse  £ MyiUa&pis  pGino- 
.  which  was  eaten  by  the  birds  Mr.  Xewstead  studied,  is  a  com- 
mon pest  in  the  United  States.  It  was  fed  upon  by  the  tree-creeper, 
a  near  relative  of  our  own  brown  creeper.     The  English  author  says: 

Many  tim.^  I  have  seen.  with  the  aid  o£  held  glasses,  the  tree  creeper 
collecting  thL?  species  during  winter  and  spring:   and  from  what  I  have 
..  tit  iP[o/-us]  palustris)  and  the  blue  tit  (P.  aeruleus     they, 
ies. 

He  found  a  few  of  these  scales   likewise   in   the   stomach  of  the 
long-tailed  tit  {Acrcdula  caudaia).    The  latter  bird,  together  with  the 
blue  tit.  fed  also  upon  another  scale  insect  which  occurs  in  the  United 
States.     This  is  a  golden-colored  scale  {Asteroleaznium  rariohsi 
which  is  sometimes  injurious  to  shade  trees.     Xewstead  ss 

I  firmly  believe  tk:  sought  tor  by  various  species  of  tits.     Here,  in 

shire,  the  characteristic  little  depressions  made  in  the  twigs  of  the  oak  by  this 
-ands.     Rarely  is  it  that  the  Ooccids  are  found  in  them. 
This  fact  for  many  years  led  me  to  suspect  the  birds  had  taken  them.     It  was  not  until 
1S9!  that  the  matter  was  placed  beyond  doubt  [by  stomach  examination].     The  May 
record  is  at  the  g  -      .n-rest.  as  at  that  time  there  would  be  a  gi  ion  of  bird 

food.     It  prove-,  therefore,  that  the  species  is  a  selected  item  in  the  dietary  o!  the  two 
species  of  birds. 

a  The  Entomologist's  Monthly  Magazine,  2d  ser.,  VI  [XXXI],  pp.  S4-S6.  1S95. 


192  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

It  is  significant  that  the  fourth  species  of  scale  insect  (Aspidiotus 
zonatus)  found  by  him  in  the  stomachs  of  birds  is  related  to  the 
notorious  San  Jose  scale.  It  was  eaten  by  the  blue  tit  {Paras  caru- 
leus) .  Among  other  foreign  birds  known  to  feed  upon  scales  is  a  South 
African  species,  the  white-eye  (Zosterops  capensis),  which  selects  the 
larger  soft  scales  (Lecaniinse). 

Recent  investigations  show  that  a  very  much  larger  number  of  our 
North  American  birds  prey  upon  scales  than  was  expected,  and  some 
eat  them  to  a  considerable  extent.  Their  influence  upon  the  number 
of  these  pests,  while  doubtless  less  than  that  of  the  predaceous  insects, 
is  of  far  more  importance  than  has  yet  been  recognized.  Among  the 
scales  they  devour  are  some  most  notorious  pests. 

SCALES    EATEX    BY    XORTH    AMERICAN    BIRDS. 

At  least  two  native  birds  eat  the  plum  scale,  which  is  destructive  to 
cherry  and  plum  trees.  One  of  them  is  the  beautiful  rose-breasted 
grosbeak  (Zamelodia  Ivdoviciana).  A  female  of  this  species  collected 
by  the  writer  in  Indiana  had  eaten  36  of  these  scales,  composing  95 
per  cent  of  the  stomach  contents.  Two  other  grosbeaks  from  Illinois 
did  still  better.  One  consumed  about  45  plum  scales,  which  made  up 
95  per  cent  of  its  food,  while  the  other  had  eaten  nothing  but  plum 
scales,  of  which  its  stomach  contained  more  than  100.  The  cardinal 
or  redbird  also  feeds  upon  the  plum  scale,  one  taken  in  Texas  in  April 
having  consumed  a  number  sufficient  to  form  S4  per  cent  of  its 
stomach  contents. 

These  two  species  of  birds  devour  other  scale  insects  also,  some  of 
which  are  closely  related  to  the  plum  scale.  The  rose-breasted  gros- 
beak has  been  found  to  eat  the  hickory  scale  (Eulecanium  carysc)  and 
the  tulip  scale  (Eulecanium  tulipiferse).  The  latter  is  very  destructive 
to  shade  trees  in  some  parts  of  the  eastern  United  States.  While  both 
the  rose-breasted  and  the  cardinal  grosbeak  eat  scales  of  the  genus 
Eulecanium  in  large  numbers,  we  have  been  unable  to  identify  spe- 
cifically any  others,  with  the  probable  exception  of  the  locust  scale, 
Evlecanium  robinarium  (Douglas),  from  the  stomach  of  a  cardinal 
collected  in  Texas.  Another  grosbeak,  the  black-headed  (Zamelodia 
nocephala),  at  home  in  the  western  United  States,  preys  upon 
scales  of  the  same  genus.  It  is  known  to  select  the  frosted  scale 
(Evlecanium  pruinosum),  which  attacks  fruit  trees  such  as  apricot, 
peach,  prune,  and  cherry,  and  is  already  important  economically,  with 
possibilities  of  becoming  a  serious  pest  if  imchecked.  It  relishes  also 
the  apricot  seal?  (Eulecanium  armeniacum),  winch  is  an  enemy  of 
apricot,  prune,  pear,  and  other  trees. 

In  the  southeastern  United  States  occurs  an  allied  genus  of  scale 
insects.  Toumeyella.  The  cardinal  feeds  upon  at  least  one  species  of 
this  group. 


BIRDS    THAT    EAT    SCALE    INSECTS. 


193 


Distributed  chiefly  along  the  Pacific  coast  is  a  scale  which  is  closely 
related  to  those  of  the  above-mentioned  genera  and  is  preyed  upon  by 
many  birds.  This  is  the  black  olive  scale  (Saissetia  olese,  fig.  1).  Its 
great  economic  importance  is  emphasized  in  the  following  quotation 
from  Mr.  C.  L.  Marlatt,  of  the  Bureau  of  Entomology: 

The  most  destructive  insect  enemies  of  fruits  in  California  are  undoubtedly  the  scale 
insects,  few  if  any  other  insects,  aside  from  the  grape  Phylloxera,  at  all  approaching 
them  in  this  respect.  Of  these  the  ones  of  greatest  moment,  and  in  the  control  of 
•which  vast  sums  of  money  are  expended,  are  the  black  scale,  the  red  scale,  and  the 
San  Jose  scale.  *  *  *  Of  the  three,  *  *  *  the  most  serious  pest  at  the  present 
time  in  California  is  undoubtedly  the  black  scale.     *    *     *     This  insect  is  not  only  a 


Fig.  1.— Black   olive  scale  (Saissetia  olex).    (From  Koebele,  Bureau  of  Entomology, 

after  Comstock.) 

heavy  drain  on  the  vigor  of  the  trees,  but  exudes  a  great  quantity  of  honeydew,  in 
which  a  fungus  propagates,  creating  a  black,  stifling  deposit,  which  adheres  closely  to 
the  twigs  and  leaves  and  discolors  the  fruit.  This  scale  infests  both  citrus  and 
deciduous  trees,  but  is  particularly  injurious  to  the  former,  and  also  to  the  olive. a 

This  abundant  and  injurious  scale  is  at  present  known  to  be  fed 
upon  by  no  less  than  29  species  of  birds,  and  their  importance  in 
checking  its  increase  can  not  be  overlooked.  These  include  three 
woodpeckers,  a  jay,  an  oriole,  five  sparrows,  four  vireos,  six  warblers, 

a  Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1896,  p.  220. 
3    A1900 13 


194  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGKICTTLTV 

two  wrens,  a  nuthatch,  four  tits,  a  gnatcatcher,  and  a  bluebird. 
Several  of  them  consume  the  black  scale  in  great  numbers,  the  two 
{■est  conspicuous  in  this  respect  being  the  black-headed  grosbeak 
and  the  bush-tit  (Psaltriparus  minimus).  Eighteen  per  cent  of  the 
entire  food  of  120  grosbeaks  consisted  of  black  olive  scales,  while  21 
per  cent  of  the  year's  subsistence  of  more  than  350  bush-tit=>  was  of 
the  same  nature. 

The  work  of  birds  upon  the  black  scale  is  so  conspicuous  that  it 
ha?  attracted  the  attention  of  field  observers.  In  a  letter  to  the 
Biological  Survey.  F.  S.  Daggett  says  (March  17,  1903   : 

A  thick  top  of  pepper  tree  is  opposite  a  window  of  my  house.  It  is  infested  by  black 
scale,  and  the  past  few  years  I  have  noticed  several  varieties  of  hirds  going  through 
p.  carefully  picking  off  scale.  Audubon  warblers  do  it.  especially  when  it  is  cold 
and  no  insect*  are  flying;  when  it  is  warm  they  stay  about  the  top.  flying  out  after  in- 
sects, but  do  not  seem  to  take  the  scale.  The  intermediate  sparrow,  however,  is  com- 
monly seen  in  small  flocks  working  on  this  scale,  and  they  go  through  many  gymnastic 
motions,  not  expected  in  a  sparrow,  in  order  to  get  at  the  scale  on  the  underside  of 
the  twigs.  The  top  is  scarcely  10  feet  from  the  window  and  I  have  watched  them 
closely.  There  is  an  overgrow*  cypress  hedge  under  one  side  of  the  tree,  from  which 
"arrows  work  r.p. 

Prof.  F.  E.  L.  Beal.  of  the  Biological  Survey,  while  at  Haywards, 
Cal..  May.  1006.  noted  particularly  the  relation  of  birds  to  this  scale. 
He  writes:  u  I  have  proved  that  they  eat  them  freely." 

Following  is  a  list  of  the  birds  which  thus  far  are  known  to  feed 
upon  the  black  olive  scale : 

Willow  woodpecker  i  Dryobates  tun--  Lutescent     warbler     (Hclmintlophila     c. 

Nuttall  woodpecker  |  Dryobates  nuttaUi  .            Sifts* 

California     woodpecker      I  M clan er pes  J.      Audubon  warbler    Dendrov: a  a udubt 

la;  Pacific  yeflowthroat  (Geothlypu  t.  arizela). 

California  jay  (Apkidmxmna  caLifon*  Golden   pfleolated    warbler     Wihonia  p. 

Bullock  oriole  |  Icterus  bull  pileelata  ►. 

Intermediate      sparrow      (Zonotrichia  I.      Black-headed     grosbeak     Zamdodia    me- 

gar,-  hnocepl 

-n-    .  i  •      •  ,    /c    •    77„    „       Cactus  wren  (Eeleodytes  brvnneicapiUus). 

rn    chipping    sparrow    iSpizella    s.      _.  .        _      l 

1  hryomanes  b.  spun. 

_  „.    ..  ,        .  Slender-billed  nuthatch  (i Sittac.  aeulcato*. 

Spurred  towhee  iPrprlom.  megatony  ¥UJm  ^^  {Bsgolopkug  i]Wrna(, 

rma  towhee  |  PxpOo  -  nut-backed  chickadee  tParvs  ru/es- 

:  n  warbling   vireo  ( I  ireo  g.  strain-         cms) 

80 '  Wren  tit    Chamsea fmciak 


.  cassini) 
Hutton  vireo  (  Mreo  mttkn 

--  vireo  (I7reo  pusill 
Yellow  warbler  I  Dendroica  sest  ' 
Myrtle  warbler    I'cndroica  coronata) 


California  bush-tit    'Psaltriparus  m.  cali- 

forrt 
Black-tailed  gnatcaicher  iPolioptUa  ecdi- 

forn 
Western  bluebird  [SiaKa  m.  occid 


Several  of  the  above  birds  eat  other  scales,  besides  the  one  which 
infests  the  olive.  One  of  these  is  the  greedy  scale  (Aspidiotus  rn  pax, 
fig.  2),  which  Dr.  L.  O.  Howard  says  "was  found  until  recently  only 
on  the  Pacific  c<  >ast  and  in  the  far  Southwest."  where  "it  levies  a  heavy 


BIRDS    THAT    EAT    SCALE    INSECTS. 


195 


annual  tax  on  the  fruit  growers,- '  and  which  "has  the  present  season 
[1S94]  made  its  appearance  in  Mississippi  and  Texas."0  The  greedy 
scale  attacks  both  citrus  and  deciduous  trees,  infesting  a  very  large 
number  of  food  plants,  among  which  it  shows  little  preference, 
and  is  one  of  the  destructive  scale  insects.  Investigations  by  the 
Biological  Survey  prove  that  at  least  four  species  of  birds — the 
myrtle  and  Audubon  warblers,  wren-tit,  and  bush-tit — devour  this 
scale,  some  individuals  examined  having  their  stomachs  filled  with  it. 
Another  scale  insect  which  is  eaten  by  several  birds,  but  which 
differs  from  the  last-mentioned  species  in  that  it  confines  itself  to  a 
single  host  plant,  is  the  oak  scale  (Kermes).  Oak  scales  are  not 
conspicuously  injurious,  but  this  fact  does  not  detract  from  the 
value  of  the  birds  which  feed  upon  them,  since  we  can  be  assured 


fe  (Aspidiotus  rapax>.     (From  Howard.  Bureau  of  Entomology.) 

they  do  not  neglect  other  kinds  which  are  destructive.  In  fact,  one 
of  the  oak-scale  feeders,  the  rose-breasted  grosbeak,  is  already  known 
to  feed  upon  other  and  harmful  scales. 

The  following  species  of  birds  have  been  found  to  devour  the  oak 
scale: 


Rose-breasted  grosbeak. 
Red-eyed  vireo. 
White-eyed  vireo. 
Worm-eating  warbler. 


Magnolia  warbler. 
Blackpoll  warbler. 
Canadian  warbler. 


The  oak-,  infested  as  they  are  by  the  comparatively  innocuous 
Kermes,  are  fortunate  in  comparison  to  the  maples,  which  are  attacked 
by  Pulvinaria.     The  cottony  maple  scale  (Pulrinaria  innumercv- 
is  a  special  pest  of  the  tree  from  which  it  derives  its  common  name,  but 


a  Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1S94,  p.  249. 


196 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


it  is  found  upon  scores  of  others.  The  writer  once  observed  an  infesta- 
tion of  this  scale  so  severe  that  shade  trees  along  the  streets  of  a  small 
town  in  Indiana,  together  with  fruit  trees,  appeared  almost  white 
from  the  choking  masses  of  cottony  wax  produced  by  the  scale  insects. 
Maples,  poplars,  and  cherry  trees  were  the  principal  hosts  in  this  case. 
According  to  Dr.  L.  O.  Howard,  "birds  destroy  the  full-grown 
scales,  although  one  would  hardly  suppose  a  mouthful  of  wax  to  be 
verv  palatable."  Doctor  Howard  "has  often  observed  the  English 
sparrow  apparently  feeding  upon  this  species.'" ■ 

The  same  little  vagrant  foreigner  that  attacks  the  maple  scale,  and 
about  whose  value  there  has  been  unending  discussion,  must  be  cred- 


Fig.  3. — Oyster-she'l  bark-louse  (Mytilaspis  pomorum).     '.From  How- 
ard. Bureau  of  Entomology.  | 

ited  with  preying  upon  still  another  of  these  destructive  pests.  Dr. 
C.  V.  Riley  and  Dr.  L.  O.Howard  note  that  "  Miss  Jennie  R.  Bush,  of 
San  Luis  Obispo  County,  Cal.,  finds  it  destroying  a  scale  insect  upon 
the  climbing  rose."6 

Among  scale  insects  eaten  by  birds  other  than  those  above  men- 
tioned is  a  very  abundant  and  widespread  species,  the  oyster-shell 
bark-louse  (Mytilaspis  pomorum,  fig.  3),  which  is  sometimes  quite 
injurious.  Indeed  it  is  said  that  in  some  sections  the  oyster-shell 
bark-louse  is,   with  the  exception  of  the  San  Jose  scale,  the  most 

a  Bui.  22,  t".  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  Division  of  Entomology,  p.  12,  1900. 
b Insect  Life,  V,  p.  349,  July,  1893. 


BIRDS   THAT    EAT    SCALE   INSECTS.  197 

destructive  scale  insect.  It  will  be  remembered  that  in  England  this 
scale  was  found  to  be  devoured  by  titmice  and  the  tree  creeper. 
In  America  the  same  kinds  of  birds  also  select  it.  In  regard  to  the 
brown  creeper  of  the  United  States  (Certkia  familiaris  americana) , 
V.  H.  Lowe  says: 

That  it  feeds  extensively  on  scale  insects  there  is  little  doubt.  It  may  often  be  seen 
on  scale-infested  trees  both  in  summer  and  winter  pecking  at  the  scales,  especially  the 
larger  ones,  such  as  the  oyster-shell  bark-louse,  evidently  for  the  purpose  of  getting  the 
eggs  or  the  live  scales. a 

Of  American  titmice  the  black-capped  chickadee  is  known  to  devour 
the  same  pest.  In  an  analysis  of  the  stomach  contents  of  one  of  these 
birds  Prof.  C.  M.  Weed  mentions  "bark-lice  (Coccidse),  apparently 
oyster-shell  bark-louse  (Mytilaspis  pomorum).'' b  The  white-breasted 
nuthatch  of  the  same  family  of  birds  also  manifests  a  liking  for  the 
scale.     Mr.  E.  N.  Forbush  records  the  following  concerning  this  species : 

March  20,  18;)5,  Mr.  Bailey  brought  in  specimens  of  apple  twigs  infested  with  the 
bark-scale  louse  (Mytilaspis  pomorum).  He  reported  that  the  nuthatch  was  feeding 
on  them. c 

With  this  insect  ends  the  list  of  scales  which  have  been  specifically 
determined  to  serve  as  food  for  birds.  It  is  to  be  remarked,  however, 
that  scales  are  difficult  to  identify  d  under  the  most  favorable  condi- 
tions, and  in  the  state  in  which  they  are  often  found  in  the  stomachs  of 
birds  their  identification  is  impossible.  Hence  there  are  a  number  of 
birds  which,  while  not  mentioned  in  connection  with  particular  scale 
insects,  are  nevertheless  known  to  feed  upon  scales.  These  birds,  16 
in  number,  include  several  woodpeckers,  which,  as  their  method  of 
feeding  would  indicate,  pick  up  many  scale  insects.  The  downy 
woodpecker  is  one  of  the  most  successful  in  gathering  these  minute 
tree  pests. 

Following  is  a  list  of  birds  ascertained  to  feed  upon  scale  insects 
none  of  which  were  specifically  identified : 


Hairy  woodpecker  {Dryobates  villosus). 

Northern  downy  woodpecker  (Dryobatcs 
p.  medianus). 

Red-eockaded  woodpecker  (Dryobatcs  bo- 
realis). 

Arctic  three-toed  woodpecker  (Picoides 
arcticus). 

Yellow-bellied  woodpecker  (Sphyrapicus 
varius). 

Red-headed  woodpecker  (Melanerpes  ery- 
throcephalus). 


Blue  jay  (Cyanodtta  cristata). 
Orchard  oriole  {Icterus  spurius). 
Baltimore  oriole  (Icterus  galbula). 
Cedar  waxwing  (Ampclis  cedrorum). 
Townsend  warbler  (Dendroica  townsendi). 
Tufted  titmouse  (Bseotophus  bicolor). 
Bridled  titmouse  (Bseolophus  icoUweberi). 
Carolina  chickadee  (Parus  carolincnsis). 
Ruby-crowned  kinglet (Bcguluscalcndula). 
Varied  thrush  (Irorcus  nscnus). 


a  Trans.  N.  Y.  State  Agr.  Soc.  and  Bureau  for  Farmers'  Inst.  Rpts.,  p.  321, 1898. 
b  Bui.  54,  N.  H.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.,  p.  93,  1898. 
cMass.  Crop  Rep.,  p.  384,  1895. 

''Mr.  James G.  Sanders,  of  the  Bureau  of  Entomology,  has  named  several  of  the  scale 
insects  mentioned  in  this  paper  and  has  given  assistance  in  other  ways. 


198  YEARBOOK   OF    THE    DEPABTME>~I    0*    AGBICULIURE. 

SUMMARY. 

All  told,  57  species  of  birds  have  been  found  to  eat  scale  insects.  It 
is  interesting  to  note  that  this  number  comprises  representatives  of  12 
families,  differing  widely  not  only  in  structure  but  in  habits.  They 
are  distributed  as  follows:  9  woodpeckers.  2  jays.  3  orioles.  8  sparrows, 
1  waxwing,  6  vireos.  11  warblers.  2  wrens.  1  tree  creeper,  2  nuthatches 
and  S  tits  of  the  titmouse  family,  1  kinglet  and  1  gnatcatcher  of  the 
Old  World  warbler  family,  and  the  varied  thrush  and  the  bluebird. 

At  first  thought  it  seems  strange  that  the  larger  birds  should  take 
the  trouble  to  pick  up  such  small  insects  as  scales.  Yet  the  numer- 
ous representation  of  woodpeckers  on  the  list  and  the  fact  that  the 
grosbeaks  among  the  bulkier  species  are  most  conspicuous  scale 
destroyers  prove  it  unsafe  to  assume  that  a  direct  relation  exists 
between  the  size  of  a  bird  and  its  insect  food.  At  the  other  extreme 
of  size  among  scale  eaters  are  some  veritable  feathered  midgets,  as, 
for  example,  the  ruby-crowned  kinglet,  the  black-tailed  gnatcatcher, 
and  the  bush-tit.  the  last  of  which  makes  more  than  one-fifth  of  its 
food  of  scales. 

Among  the  majority  of  these  birds,  both  great  and  small,  there  is 
noticeable  one  similarity  of  habit.  They  are  tree  frequenters.  On 
their  arboreal  excursions  they  must  constantly  come  across  scale 
insects,  and  as  the  latter  are  no  doubt  nutritious  and  are  toothsome 
to  the  avian  taste,  it  is  only  natural  that  birds  should  feed  upon  them. 
A  few  species  which  do  not  often  visit  trees,  but  which  are  included 
among  the  birds  known  to  eat  scales,  probably  secure  them  very 
rarely. 

It  is  worthy  of  note  that  the  buds  thus  far  found  to  prey  upon 
scales  are  practically  the  only  species  in  their  respective  families  that 
have  been  carefully  studied.  Thus  only  a  few  stomachs  of  the  black 
and  white  creeper,  one  of  the  most  exclusively  arboreal  birds  in  North 
America,  have  as  yet  been  examined:  and  while  it  can  not  be  included 
hi  the  present  list,  there  is  little  doubt  that,  in  common  with  many 
of  its  warbler  kin.  it  subsists  partly  upon  scale  insects.  Investiga- 
tion of  the  role  birds  play  in  destroying  these  insects  is  far  from  com- 
plete, and,  bearing  in  mind  the  number  of  scale-eating  birds  of  each 
of  the  families  named  above,  it  is  fair  to  conclude  that  the  majority 
of  the  species  of  woodpeckers,  vireos.  arboreal  warblers,  nuthatches, 
tits,  kinglets,  and  gnatcatchers  ultimately  will  be  found  Co  eat  scale 
insects.  The  fact  that  57  kinds  of  buds  feed  upon  scales.  20  of  them, 
destroying  one  of  the  two  most  destructive  species  hi  the  United 
States,  is  most  encouraging 

While  in  the  p.  ate  of  our  knowledge  it  can  not  be  claimed 

that  birds  are  among  the  chief  enemies  of  i  yet  they  are  proven 

to  be  one  of  nature's  means  of  keeping  these  insects  in  check,  and 
there  is  no  doubt  that  their  aid  is  important. 


THE   EFFECT   OF   CLIMATIC    CONDITIONS    ON   THE  COM- 
POSITION OF  DURUM  WHEAT. 

By  J.  A.  Le  Clerc, 
Of  the  Bureau  of  Chemistry. 

IMPORTANCE    OF    DURUM    WHEAT. 

The  growing  importance  of  durum  wheat  in  this  country,  as  shown 
by  the  ever-increasing  acreage  devoted  to  its  culture  (the  season  of 
1906  yielding  a  crop  of  over  50,000,000  bushels),  makes  this  kind  of 
wheat  a  profitable  subject  of  investigation.  When  one  considers 
that  it  is  only  since  1 S99  that  any  sj'stematic  attempt  has  been  made 
to  propagate  this  valuable  crop  in  the  United  States,0  the  value  of  the 
investigation  to  our  agricultural  interests  is  evident. 

Durum  wheat  (Tr'rtieum  durum,  in  contradistinction  to  Triticum 
vulgare,  under  which  name  ordinary  spring  and  winter  wheats  are 
known)  is  grown  extensively  in  Russia,  Algeria,  Italy,  and  Spain. 
In  this  country  it  flourishes  remarkably  well  in  the  Great  Plains  areas 
of  the  Middle  West,  where  the  climate  is  hot  and  dry,  similar  to  that 
of  those  European  countries  whence  this  wheat  was  obtained. 

Durum  wheat  is  a  hard,  flinty,  translucent  grain,  very  rich  in  gluten 
and  comparatively  rich  in  sugars.  The  gram  is  long,  and  may  be 
either  dark  or  light  in  color,  according  to  the  variety  and  the  condi- 
tions under  which  it  is  grown.  It  is  somewhat  poorer  in  gliadin  than 
the  best  bread  wheats.  Like  other  good  varieties  of  wheat,  durum  or 
hard  wheat  is  one  of  the  most  nutritive  and  healthful  of  human  foods, 
containing  as  it  does  protein  and  nonnitrogenous  substances  in  almost 
the  ideal  ratio  for  maintaining  the  body  in  a  normal  condition,  the 
gluten  (protein)  being  used  in  repairing  waste  body  tissue,  and  the  fat, 
starch,  etc.  (nonnitrogenous  substances),  furnishing  the  heat  and 
energy  required  by  the  system.  On  account  of  its  highly  glutenous 
nature  it  is  extensively  used,  especially  in  Italy  and  France,  in  the 
manufacture  of  macaroni,  vermicelli,  and  other  edible  pastes.  For 
this  reason  it  has  been  called  "macaroni  wheat.  "  There  is  likewise  a 
growing  demand  for  durum  wheat  on  the  part  of  millers  here  and 
abroad,  both  for  making  straight  durum  flour  and  for  mixing  with  the 
softer  and  less  glutenous  varieties  in  order  to  improve  the  quality  of 
the  flour,  making  these  wheats,  therefore,  valuable  as  bread  wheats. 

°U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry,  Bui.  3,  Macaroni  wheats,  and  Bui.  70, 
The  commercial  status  of  durum  wheat,  Carleton.  The  influence  of  environment  upon 
the  composition  of  cereals  is  now  the  subject  of  cooperative  study  by  the  Bureau  of 
Chemistry  and  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

199 


200  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

For  these  reasons  we  may  expect  the  price  of  durum  wheat  in  the  near 
future  to  be  as  high  or  higher  than  that  of  the  ordinary  spring  or 
winter  wheat. 

FACTORS    WHICH    INFLUENCE    QUALITY    OF    GRAIN. 

In  studying  the  influences  which  affect  the  quality  of  grain,  one 
may  either  grow  the  same  variety  of  gram  in  a  great  many  localities, 
or  else  grow  it  in  the  same  locality  during  a  long  series  of  years.  In 
either  case  we  are  able  to  note  marked  changes  in  the  crop,  due  to  the 
climatic  conditions  under  which  it  is  grown.  As  it  is  only  two  years 
since  this  cooperative  work  was  undertaken,  we  are  limited  to  a  com- 
parison of  the  same  varieties  grown  in  many  different  localities  during 
this  time  only.  The  requirements  for  growing  a  plant  are  many,  and 
the  deficiency  or  excess  of  any  one  of  them  has  its  influence  on  the 
crop.  In  order  to  grow,  cereals  require  plant  food,  water,  oxygen, 
heat,  and  light.  A  wheat  seed  must  have  an  initial  temperature  of  at 
least  42z  F.  in  order  to  germinate,  and  only  when  the  temperature  is 
above  that  does  the  plant  grow. 

Cereals  are  influenced  both  in  quantity  and  quality  to  a  greater  or 
less  extent  by  the  soil  in  which  they  grow,  the  plant  food  contained 
therein,  the  temperature  of  the  season,  the  rainfall  or  the  amount  of 
water  they  receive  during  the  growing  period,  the  amount  of  sunshine 
they  get.  the  humidity  of  the  atmosphere,  the  previous  crop,  the  time 
of  harvest,  the  length  of  the  growing  period,  the  kind  of  seed,  etc. 

In  our  study  of  the  chemical  and  physical  changes  which  durum 
wheat  has  undergone  in  growing  in  different  localities  or  in  different 
seasons,  the  following  determinations  have  been  made:  Water,  ash, 
phosphoric  acid,  nitrogen  (gluten),  the  weight  per  thousand  grains, 
the  weight  per  bushel,  and  the  character  of  the  gram  (whether  flinty 
or  mealy).  As  far  as  possible  the  folio  whig  data  were  also  collected: 
The  monthly  temperature  and  rainfall  and  the  elevation  above  sea 
level  of  each  locality,  the  time  of  growing  and  harvesting,  the  yield, 
the  successive  number  of  crops  grown  after  the  introduction  of  the 
original  seed  into  this  country,  and  whether  or  not  the  crop  was 
grown  under  irrigation. 

The  percentage  of  water  in  the  grain  was  determined  in  all  cases, 
that  all  results  might  be  calculated  to  a  water-free  and  therefore  com- 
parable basis.  The  ash  is  of  importance  in  showing  the  amount  of 
plant  food  taken  up  by  the  plant  and  transmitted  to  the  grain.  The 
determination  of  phosphoric  acid  shows  the  amount  of  a  most  impor- 
tant and  too  often  neglected  food  constituent,  it  haying  been  shown 
that  the  phosphorus  of  wheat  occurs  as  an  organic  compound  having 
a  decidedly  beneficial  effect  on  nutrition. 

The  weight  per  thousand  grains  is  of  greater  importance  than  is 
generally  supposed,  for  when  taken  into  consideration  with  the 
weight  per  bushel    it  forms  the  basis  of  valuation  of    commercial 


CLIMATE    AND    THE    COMPOSITION    OF    DURUM    WHEAT.  201 

wheats;  for  the  heavier  the  wheat  per  bushel  and  per  thousand 
grains,  the  more  protein,  as  a  rule,  does  the  sample  contain,  and  there- 
fore the  more  nutritious  and  valuable  it  is.  The  weight  per  thousand 
grains  is  also  of  value  in  indicating  the  amount  of  seed  to  be  sown,  as 
the  larger  the  seed  the  greater  the  volume  that  one  should  sow. 

The  nitrogen  determination0  is  the  most  important,  as  the  food 
and  commercial  value  of  cereals  depends  in  a  large  measure  on  the 
amount  of  gluten  they  contain.  The  character  of  a  grain,  whether 
it  be  flinty  or  mealy,  is  likewise  a  good  indication  of  the  nutritive 
value  of  a  wheat,  a  more  flinty  or  horny  appearance  always  indicating, 
in  the  same  variety,  a  higher  amount  of  gluten.  The  difference  in 
percentage  of  protein,  as  will  be  seen  later,  may  be  as  much  as  6  per 
cent  in  favor  of  the  flinty  grain  over  the  mealy  one.  In  many  places 
the  price  of  wheat  is  dependent  mainly  upon  the  gluten  content. 
This  is  especially  true  in  Budapest,  in  Magdeburg,  and  in  other 
markets  where  buyers  depend  on  weight  per  bushel  and  the  flinty  or 
amber  appearance  of  the  grain,  for  the  more  flinty  or  amber  a  wheat 
of  the  same  variety  is  the  higher  is  the  gluten  content. 

Before  discussing  the  results  obtained  from  the  chemical  studies 
and  field  observations,  it  may  be  well  to  say  that  of  all  the  samples  and 
varieties  investigated  three  varieties  of  durum  have  been  selected  for 
comparison — Kubanka,  a  Russian  or  northern  wheat,  and  Pelissier 
and  Marouani,  Mediterranean  wheats,  the  latter  two  being  from 
Algeria.  These  wTere  chosen  because  they  had  been  grown  under  a 
greater  diversity  of  conditions,  thus  giving  better  opportunities  for 
more  correct  interpretation  of  the  influence  of  the  various  conditions 
on  the  chemical  and  physical  characteristics. 

In  order  to  be  able  to  judge  correctly  of  the  changes  which  a  plant 
undergoes  in  changing  its  habitat  one  should  know  the  composition 
of  that  plant  in  its  own  home.  As  only  a  very  few  of  the  original 
samples  were  available  for  analysis  it  was  necessary  to  rely  on  the 
published  results  of  wheat  analyses  for  information  concerning  the 
character  of  wheat  grown  in  Russia  and  other  countries.  From  these 
sources  it  appears  that  Russian  spring  wheat  contains  about  3  per  cent 
of  nitrogen,  an  amount  slightly  greater  than  that  in  the  average  of 
our  American-grown  durum  wheat,  though  many  individual  samples 
of  our  durums  far  surpass  that  figure.  The  average  per  cent  of  pro- 
tein in  Italian  durums  is  about  the  same  as  in  those  grown  under  our 
best  conditions.  On  the  other  hand,  American-grown  durums  con- 
tain several  per  cent  more  protein  than  those  grown  in  Roumania. 

The  samples  of  Kubanka  were  grown  in  1903,  1904,  and  1905  in 
every  State  west  of  the  one  hundredth  meridian  (approximately  a 
straight  line  drawn  through  western  Dakota  to  Texas),  most  of  them 

«  Mr.  T.  C.  Trescot,  Bureau  of  Chemistry,  made  the  nitrogen  determinations  and  Mr. 
Leavitt  and  Mr.  Keister  assisted  in  the  analytical  work. 


202 


YEAEBOOK    OP    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


coming  from  the  great  semiarid  region.  Some  were  grown  in  the  irri- 
gated lands  of  Colorado.  "Washington.  Idaho,  and  Utah,  and  some  in 
the  dry  sections  of  those  States. 

EFFECTS    OF    EXCESSIVE    MOISTURE. 

In  comparing  the  results  the  remarkable  influence  which  irrigation 
or  rainfall  exerts  when  either  is  in  excess  is  very  striking.  For  exam- 
ple, in  10t)3  eight  samples  were  grown  in  the  arid  or  semiarid  regions 
and  seven  samples  in  more  humid  localities,  as  given  in  the  following 

table: 

Comparison  of  wheals  grown  in  arid  and  humid  regions. 

ARID  AND  SEMIARID  REGIONS. 


La  bo- 
ra torv 

X 


gen. 


1  Phos-  g  Weight 

phoric    per  I 
arid.       grains.       bushel. 


Belt.  Mom 

Reiburg.  Idaho 

Idalia.Colo 

Westport,  S.  Dak 

Brooking:?.  S.  Dak  .... 

Culber  1493 

Heath,  Xebr 

Havs.  Kans 


Per  d. 

2. 03 


3.16 

-  ■ 

!   ■  • 
3.00 

-  72 
2.  SB 


- 
.     - 

2.50 
2.05 

.    IS 


Per  ct. 
- 
.91 
1.10 
1.04 
.83 
1.  IS 


Grams. a 

-. 
32.9 
33.S 
33.6 

-'   - 

-  I 

-  ! 


Rain- 
grains. 


Pounds. 

Per  cent. 

Inches. 

63.7 

100 

14 

_ 

95 

15 

- 

100 

12 

60.2 

95 

23 

58.1 

100 

28 

100 
100 

13 

57.1 

33 

Average. 


; 


3D. 


•■> 


nCMIP  AND  IRRIGATED  REGIONS. 


Colo 638 

Crest  one.  Colo 1560  1.84 

Ibapah.  Utah ...  477  2.46 

I  v.Mich 1489  1.96 

East  Peru.  Iowa 1491  2.78 

Fargo.  X.  Dak 

Mavfield.  Utah 1,483  -    B 


- 


2.18 

0.99 

34.1 

(») 

2.10 

1.00 

40.0 

63.1 

20 

.     - 

.99 

- 

(») 

j    2.09 

.98 

25.3 

S 

IE 

-4 

. 

1.03 

27.4 

" 

95 

36 

2.  14 

1.05 
.88 

34.9 
34.4 

22 

■■ 

- 

"■ 

2-l.i 

.98 

33.5 

68 

a  Or.e  ounce=approximately  2S  grams.  ^  Crop  was  in 

The  most  striking  result  is  the  higher  nitrogen  content  of  wheat 
grown  in  the  drier  localities,  the  difference  amounting  to  0.57  per  cent 
of  nitrogen  or  3.2  per  cent  of  protein  7  =  protein1.     There  hap- 

pens to  be  very  little  difference  in  per  cent  of  ash  or  of  phosphoric  acid, 
but  the  weight  per  thousand  grains  is  considerably  higher  as  a  general 
rule  in  the  more  moist  regions.  A  glance  at  the  column  headed 
"  Flinty  grains  "  will  likewise  reveal  the  fact  that  in  the  humid  or  in  the 
i  ted  regions  the  general  tendency  of  the  wheat  is  to  become  mealy 
tarchy.  Similar  results  were  obtained  in  1905.  though  owi:  _ 
the  presence  of  more  moisture  than  usual  in  the  semiarid  regions  the 
difference  in  the  nitrogen  content  is  only  0.3  per  cent,  which  is  equiv- 
alent to  1.7  per  cent  protein.  The  weight  per  thousand  grains  was  as 
31.7  is  to  35.6,  the  humid  regions  producing  the  larger  gra 


CLIMATE    AXD    THE    COMPOSITION    OF    DURUM    WHEAT. 


203 


In  1904  thirteen  samples  of  Kubanka  were  o-rown  in  as  many  dif- 
ferent places.  By  separating  these  into  two  classes,  one  consisting  of 
7  localities  with  IS  inches  or  less  of  rainfall,  and  the  other  of  6  locali- 
ties with  more  than  15  inches  of  rainfall  or  having  irrigation,  it  is  again 
seen  that  the  wheats  from  the  drier  regions  contain  0.47  per  cent 
more  of  nitrogen  (2.7  per  cent  of  protein).  Furthermore,  the  wheat 
of  the  humid  regions  contains  a  larger  percentage  of  mealy  kernels, 
showing  that  there  is  a  very  close  relation  between  the  percentage  of 
protein  and  the  percentage  of  flint}- grains— that  is,  generally,  the  more 
flinty  the  kernels  the  higher  is  the  percentage  of  protein.  An  excess- 
ive amount  of  rainfall  or  irrigation  is  almost  always  accompanied  by 
a  crop  containing  a  very  low  percentage  of  protein.  This  is  further 
shown  in  the  work  done  in  14  different  localities  in  the  far  Western 
States;  7  of  these  places  were  irrigated  and  the  percentage  of  protein 
averaged  12.1,  while  in  the  7  places  where  no  irrigation  was  practiced 
the  protein  content  of  the  wheat  was  15.4  per  cent. 

Two  samples  of  durum  wheat  grown  in  Mexico  Avere  recently 
received  and  analyzed.  They  had  been  grown  from  the  same  seed 
and  on  adjacent  land.  One  sample  was  irrigated,  the  other  was  not, 
there  being,  moreover,  very  little  rainfall  during  the  growing  season. 
The  following  table  shows  the  difference  in  the  two  samples: 

Comparison  of  irrigated  and  nonimjjated  durum  wheats  gro:-  ;<:o. 


Samples. 


Original  seed 

Irrigated 

Xonirrigated 


ratorv 
No. 

Protein. 

Flinty 

grains. 

Weight 

of  1,000 
grains. 

17S0 
1781 

17-2 

Per  cent. 
12.  3 
11.1 
17.7 

Per  cent. 
100 
20 
100 

Grams. 
38.  S 
29.4 
29.2 

The  nonirrigated  sample  consisted  of  flinty  kernels  entirely  and  con- 
tained 5.4  per  cent  more  protein  than  the  original  seed  and  6.6  per 
cent  more  protein  than  the  irrigated  sample.  The  irrigated  sample 
contained,  moreover,  very  few  flinty  kernels  (only  20  per  cent). 
The  difference  in  protein  content  between  the  irrigated  and  nonirri- 
gated samples  is  the  greatest  that  the  writer  has  ever  observed,  the 
irrigated  sample  showing  a  marked  deterioration  both  in  chemical  and 
physical  properties. 

Such  observations  on  the  influence  of  excessive  amounts  of  moisture 
corroborate  the  results  obtained  by  Lawes  and  Gilbert,  in  which 
they  showed  that  the  hot,  moderately  dry  seasons  produced  the 
best  quality  of  wheat,  the  cold,,  rainy  seasons  yielding  the  poorest 
crops  in  the  history  of  England.  The  six  seasons  of  bad  crops  showed 
rain  to  have  fallen  during  each  of  190  days.  The  seasons  of  good 
crops  had  but  136  days  during  which  it  rained.  The  probable  reason 
for  such  differences  is  that  an  excessive  rainfall  dilutes  the  nitrates 


204 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OP    AGRICULTURE. 


in  the  soil  too  much,  and  there  being  but  small  amounts  of  carbo- 
hydrates in  the  process  of  formation,  owing  to  lack  of  sunshine,  less 
protein  is  formed.     The  result  is  a  mealy  grain  of  low  protein  content. 

EFFECTS    OF    PROPER    IRRIGATION    IN    DRY    REGIONS. 

Without  water,  however,  there  can  be  no  vegetable  production:  even 
the  best  soils  must  lie  sterile.  When,  therefore,  there  is  too  little  rain- 
fall for  plant  growth,  irrigation  is  the  salvation  of  the  crop.  It  supplies 
water  when  needed,  and  in  proper  amounts.  It  is  capable  of  doubling, 
even  trebling,  crop?.  Backhauls  found  that  irrigation  increased  wheat 
straw  94  per  cent  and  wheat  grain  169  per  cent,  the  actual  value  of 
the  increase  in  crop  per  acre-foot  of  water  being  $27  to  $70. 

In  the  mountain  States  of  the  West,  where  irrigation  is  practiced, 
in  Colorado  for  example,  ideal  conditions  for  plant  growth  prevail,  for 
there  the  sky  is  clear,  the  sunshine  intense,  the  air  dry.  Therefore, 
if  water  can  be  supplied  when  the  crops  are  in  need  of  it.  assimilation 
will  go  on  at  its  best  and  the  production  of  organic  substance  will  be 
all  the  more  favored.  The  result  will  be  a  large  crop  of  large-sized 
grain.  The  results,  in  fact,  show  this  to  be  true.  Whereas  the  aver- 
age weight  of  a  thousand  grains  grown  in  the  semiarid  regions  from 
Texas  to  North  Dakota  varies  from  23  to  31  grams,  a  thousand  grains 
in  the  mountain  States  of  Colorado.  Wyoming.  Idaho,  etc..  where 
irrigation  is  in  vogue,  average  over  36  grams.  The  table  following 
shows  the  differences  in  the  same  variety  of  wheat  (Kubanka]  when 
grown  during  three  successive  seasons  with  and  without  irrigation: 

A    }xml-(i  wheats  groirn  under  dry-land  farming  and  under  irrigation. 
UNDER  DRY-LAND  FARMING. 


Year. 

Locality. 

L 1 ' 
ratorv 

i 

Nitro- 
gen. 

Ash. 

Phos- 
phoric- 
acid. 

Weieht 
of  1.000 

grains. 

Weight 

per 
bushel. 

Flinty  ' 
grains. 

Per  d.  : 

Per  ct. 

Per  cf. 

Grams.a 

Pounds. 

Fer  ct. 

1903 

Idaho 

14S1 

1.75 

0.91 

32.9 

62.1 

95 

1904 

Colorado 

ffiS 

3.16  ' 

2.12 

1.10 

• 

- 

100 

- 

1.93 

1.00 

33.3 

97 

Idaho 

1548 

-_ 

2.05 

- 

31.1 

57.1 

100    j 

Do 

1554 

2.60 

2.03 

1.00 

■ 

63.0 

95 

Colorado 

1562 

2.61 

2.32 

1.21 

23.3 

61.5 

100 

1905 

Do 

Average 

Idaho 

""- 

2.64 

2.40 

1.26 

14.5 

56.3 

100    ; 

- 

2.20 

1.11 

- 

- 

1555 

3.01 

1.76 

.79 

35.0 

63.5 

100 

Do 

G 

3.15 

208 

1.12 

27.3 

60.9 

100 

Colorado 

1559 

2.41 

.  25 

1  15 

33.6 

63.1 

95 

Do 

Average 

2.45 

2.16 

1.19 

33  1 

. 

90 

- 

2.16 

1.06 

32  2 

K 

-  " 

.     . 

1  07 

30.3 

tO  9 

98 

i  One  ounce  =  approximately  2S  grains. 


CLIMATE   AXD    THE    COMPOSITION    OF    DURUM    WHEAT. 


205 


Kubanka  wheats  grown  under  dry-land  farming  and  under  irrigation — Continued. 
UNDER  IRRIGATION. 


Year. 

Locality. 

Labo- 
ratory 
No. 

Nitro- 
gen. 

Ash. 

Phos- 
phoric 
acid 

Weight 
of  1,000 
grains. 

Weight 

per 
bush-]. 

Flinty 
grains. 

1903 
1904 

1905 

638 
LS60 

Per  et. 

1.63 
1.84 

Per  ct. 

2.18 
2.10 

Per  et. 
0.99 
1.00 

Grains. 
34.1 
40.0 

Pounds. 



63.  1 

Per  ct. 

20 

Do 

Average 

Idaho 

Do 

Colorado 

Do 

Average 

1.74 

2.  14 

1.00 

37.  1    

20 

1552 
1549 

1516 
1517 

2.37 
2.04 
1.9S 
2.02 

2.  22 
2.  11 
1.90 
2.  25 

1.13 

1.06 

.97 

1.10 

39.7 
37.0 
37.0 
35.8 

62.8 
62.8 
63.1 
60.9 

82 
46 
38 
47 

2.10 

2.  12 

1.06 

37.4 

53 

1553 
1563 

1518 

2.30 
1.85 

2.  11 

2.24 
1.97 
2.05 

1.13 

.89 

1.00 

35.8 
36.1 
33.7 

62.1 

64.  5 
61.  6 

90 

50 
70 

Do 

2.09 

2.08 

1.00 

35.2 

70 



2.02 

2.11 

1.03 

36.6 

62.  7 

55 

These  samples  were  grown  in  Colorado  and  Idaho,  some  under  dry- 
land farming,  the  others  under  irrigation.  One  of  the  first  differences 
noted  is  that  under  dry-land  farming  there  is  0.73  per  cent  more  nitro- 
gen (or  4.16  per  cent  more  protein)  in  the  dry-land  wheat  than  in  that 
grown  under  irrigation.  The  weight  per  thousand  grains,  however,  is 
greater  under  irrigation.  The  percentage  of  flinty  kernels  is  markedly 
greater  under  dry-land  farming.  It  is  almost  alwa}Ts  the  case  that 
irrigation  tends  to  produce  a  mealy  grain,  although  in  several  instances 
it  has  been  noted  that  even  under  irrigation  the  grain  has  kept  its 
flinty  character.  This  is  explainable  only  on  the  theory  that  the  irri- 
gation has  not  been  excessive,  and  suggests  a  line  of  research  just 
entered  upon — that  is,  the  investigation  of  the  effects  of  varying 
amounts  of  irrigation  at  different  periods  of  growth.  The  grain 
grown  under  dry-land  farming  contains  practically  the  same,  amount 
of  phosphoric  acid  in  the  ash  as  that  grown  under  irrigation,  the  per- 
centage being  49  in  each  case. 

INFLUENCE    OF    SOILS,    FERTILIZERS,    AND    TEMPERATURE. 

Soils  and  fertilizers  also  have  more  or  less  influence  on  the  quality  of 
the  crop.  This  influence  is  much  less  marked,  however,  than  is  that 
of  rainfall  or  of  climate  in  general.  One  would  naturally  expect  that 
soil  would  exert  less  influence  than  the  character  of  the  season,  from 
the  fact  that  only  5  per  cent  of  the  plant  constituents  are  derived  from 
the  soil.  Yet  it  is  a  well-known  fact  that  nitrogenous  fertilizers  affect 
the  straw  content  of  cereals,  and,  to  a  certain  extent,  the  percentage  of 
protein  in  the  grain,  Wiley  having  long  since  established  that  the  nitro- 
gen of  the  grain  was  present  in  proportion  to  the  nitrogen  of  the  soil. 


206 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTO 


Lawes  and  Gilbert  showed  that  manure  performed  the  function  of 
lessening  relatively  the  transpiration  of  plants.     They  established  the 
fact  that  for  every  gram  of  organic  matter  elaborated  250  to  3 
as  much  water  had  been  transpired,  but  that  when  the  land  was  rich 
in  plant  food,  after  having  been  well  manured,  for  example,  a  rela- 
tively- smaller  amount  of  "  ken  up  and  given  off  by  the  p] 
Therefore,  fertilizers  not  only  supply  the  plant  with  the  necessary  f 
but  lessen  the  relative  amount  of  water  transpired.     It  would  follow 
from  tins  that  fertilizers  are  of  considerable  assistance  in  combating 
drought,  for  we  know  that  potash  increases  the  water-holding  capacity 
of  soils,  and  that  one  of  the  chief  uses  of  transpiration  is  to  obtain  for 
the  plant  the  necessary  plant  food :  it  is  a  means  rather  than  an  end. 

The  temperature  of  the  season  likewise  has  its  influence  on  the  qual- 
ity and  quantity  of  plants,  hot  seasons  producing  the  s  »undant 
crops.  As  hot  seasons  are  more  or  less  dry  seasons  also,  and  wet  and 
cold  seasons  go  together,  the  latter  yielding  the  poor  crops,  one  must 
assume  that  it  is  not  so  much  a  matter  of  temperature  alone  as  it  is  of 
both  temperature  and  moderate  rainfall. 

ADVANTAGE    OF    SHORT    BROWING    SEASON. 

The  length  of  the  growing  period  also  exerts  its  influence,  the  longer 
period  of  growth  giving,  as  a  rule,  a  lower  percentage  of  protein. 
This  is  conclusively  shown  in  the  table  following,  the  crops  having 
been  grown  without  irrigation. 

/'  QTcnrth  on  nitrogen  content  and  \cright  of  vrheat. 
KG   PERIODS  IX  THE  SA15I  V. 


FUice 


T.abora- 


1905 

am 


Idalia.  Colo 

Do 

Do 

I>ai: 



Holyoke,  Colo 




Per  c»«f. 

: 

111 

1H 

- 

:-.     ~ 

1559 

" 

. 

30 

33.6 

1486 

i 

2.45 

» 

33.1 

i 

I 

1   " 

_•- 

33.6 

1477 

123 

-     - 

33 

34.3 

1 

130 

.   % 

22 

35.6 

119 

' 

33.5 

rTH.  DIFFERENT  LOCAL] 




as 

Uafao 1904 

1904 



Do 1905 

1905 

IlnjToke,  Colo 

A  vcr.g; 


I     " 

i    . 

14* 

■    ■ 


133 

B 

140 

S3 

153 

130 


2.  41 


.- 

■ 

- 

12 

3L1 

- 

23.3 

■ 

33.6 

30 

33.1 

34.5 

22 

35.6 

30 

3L4    ] 

CLIMATE    AND    THE    COMPOSITION    OF    DURUM    WHEAT. 


207 


Effect  of  long  and  short  periods  of  growth  on  nitrogen  content  and  weight  of  wheat- 
Continued. 

SHORT  PERIODS  OF  GROWTH,  DIFFERENT  LOCALITIES. 


Place. 


North  Enid.  Okla  . . 
Fitzgerald.  Okla. . . 

Oakley,  Elans 

Fargo,  N.  Dak 

Fullerton.  H.  Dak.. 

Heath.  Nebr.  _ 

Rexburg,  Idaho. . . 

Idalia,  Colo 

Cowichi,  "Wash 

Cheney,  Wash 

HoLyoke,  Colo 


Average . 


Year_ 


Labora- 
tory No. 


1903 

1593 

1903 

659 

1904 

1049 

1903 

649 

1904 

1487 

1905 

1522 

1903 

1481 

1904 

1558 

1904 

1533 

1984 

1537 

1903 

16(56 

Days. 


Nitro- 
gen. 


71 
82 
96 
99 
86 
102 
85 
97 
73 
70 

ri9 


Ptr  cent. 
3.42 
.  _ 
3.05 
2.37 
2.40 
3.21 
2.78 
2.64 
2.85 
1.99 
3.45 


2.  80 


Rain- 
fall. 


Weight 
of  1.000 


finches. 

29 
22 
21 
22 
21 
24 
15 
21 
10 
14 
11 


Grams. 
40.3 
31.6 
33.2 
34.9 
19.  6 
30.0 
32.9 
14.5 
37.6 
38.7 
33.3 


31.0 


The  number  of  days  varies  from  71  in  Oklahoma  to  254  in  Washing- 
ton, where  the  sample  was  grown  as  a  winter  variety.  The  difference 
in  the  average  results  between  the  short  and  long  growing  periods 
is  0.35  per  cent  nitrogen  or  2.1  per  cent  protein.  From  the  length  of 
the  period  of  growth  and  the  average  temperature  during  that  period 
some  conclusions  may  be  drawn  as  to  the  number  of  heat  units 
required  to  mature  a  crop  in  the  various  localities  and  tinder  the  vary- 
ing conditions.  We  find,  for  instance,  that  North  Enid.  Okla.,  with 
71  days  as  the  growing  period  and  64°  as  the  average  temperature  of 
that  period,  requires  4,544  heat  units  to  mature  a  wheat  crop.  On  the 
other  hand.  Idalia,  Colo.,  required  157  days  with  an  average  tempera- 
ture of  58°,  or  9,106  heat  units. 

Professor  Ladd,  of  North  Dakota,  found  that  for  conditions  prevail- 
ing in  that  State  an  average  of  98.5  days  or  6,215  heat  units  were 
required  for  wheat  to  mature.  The  results  obtained  by  the  writer 
are  very  close  to  these  figures,  giving  an  average  of  6,280  heat  units 
for  North  Dakota.  For  North  Dakota,  South  Dakota.  Kansas,  and 
Nebraska,  averaged  together,  7,037  heat  units  are  required.  Practi- 
cally the  same  amount.  7.054,  is  found  necessary  in  Colorado,  Mon- 
tana, Idaho,  Utah,  and  Wyoming.  Heat  is  the  chief  factor  in  the 
distribution  of  plants,  as  they  only  live  where  the  air  and  soil  are 
warm  enough  to  carry  on  the  vital  processes.  The  absorption  of 
water,  and  therefore  of  plant  food,  by  the  root  hairs,  the  assimilation 
of  carbon  by  the  chlorophyll  of  the  leaves,  stooling.  flowering,  and 
maturing  all  require  so  man}-  heat  units.  As  a  general  thing  the 
length  of  the  growing  period,  and  therefore  the  heat  units,  decrease 
as  one  goes  toward  the  pole;  in  Norway,  for  example,  barley  requires 
but  1,500  heat  units  to  mature. 


208  YEARBOOK    OF    IKE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

INFLUENCE    OF    SEED    AND    PREVIOUS    CROP. 

As  to  the  influence  of  the  seed  on  the  crop,  there  is  here  also  a 
diversity  of  opinion.  Fischer,  in  Germany,  maintaining  that  it  has 
no  influence,  whereas  in  the  work  done  by  Hopkins,  of  Illinois,  in  grow- 
ng  corn  for  protein  or  for  oil.  the  seed  was  selected  because  of  the  high 
protein  or  oil  content. 

Considerable  work  is  being  done  to  determine  the  influence  of  the 
previous  crop  on  the  quality  of  grain,  such  work  being  carried  on  in 
cooperation  with  the  experiment  stations  of  Tennessee  and  California. 
As  the  fertilizers  exert  more  or  less  influence  it  is  to  be  expected  that 
such  crops  as  legumes  will  play  some  part  in  modifying  the  composi- 
tion of  wheat. 

EFFECT   OF    TIME    AND    MANNER    OF    HARVESTING. 

The  time  of  harvest  also  affects  the  quality  of  a  grain  to  a  marked 
degree.  If  harvested  too  early,  the  grain  is  shriveled  and  so  of  inferior 
quality:  if  harvested  too  late,  the  quantity  only  is  appreciably  affected, 
as  a  considerable  loss  is  apt  to  take  place  through  shattering.  The 
most  propitious  time  for  harvesting  is  when  the  grain  is  of  a  waxy 
consistency  and  can  be  cleanly  broken  by  the  finger  nail.  From  this 
time  on  there  is  no  appreciable  change  in  the  chemical  composition  of 
the  dry  matter.  Any  delay  in  harvesting  after  the  waxy  consistency 
of  the  grain  makes  its  appearance  may  result  in  considerable  loss,  not 
only  through  shattering,  but  from  the  effect  of  unfavorable  weather 
conditions.  Even  during  the  time  of  the  Romans  the  saying  was 
'"Better  to  harvest  two  days  ahead  than  two  days  too  late." 

The  changes  which  take  place  during  the  growing  period  are  of 
exceeding  interest.  Up  to  the  time  of  full  flowering,  wheat  has 
elaborated  S7  per  cent  of  the  dry  matter  and  has  absorbed  all  the 
nitrogen,  lime,  and  potash  that  it  requires  and  74  per  cent  of  the 
phosphoric  acid.  From  this  it  will  be  seen  that  the  plant  continues 
to  absorb  phosphoric  acid  from  the  soil  until  almost  mature.  Shortly 
before  maturity  the  mother  plant  ceases  to  draw  any  further  nourish- 
ment from  the  soil,  and  it  then  becomes  the  function  of  the  plant  to 
transport  the  elaborated  materials  to  the  head  and  grain.  At  this 
time  a  severe  drought,  accompanied  by  excessively  hot  weather,  is 
apt  to  check  the  process  of  transporting  the  soluble  substances  elabo- 
rated in  the  leaves  and  stems  to  the  head  and  gram,  thus  causing  the 
production  of  a  shriveled  wheat. 

In  1905  the  writer  collected  several  samples  of  wheat  at  Brookings, 
S.  Dak.,  some  of  which  were  harvested  early,  i.  e..  in  the  soft  dough 
stage,  and  some  after  fully  maturing.  In  every  case  those  samples 
harvested  early  gave  a  very  low  weight  per  thousand  grains  and 
were  more  or  less  shrunken.  Those  harvested  late  were  plump. 
The  following  table  shows  the  results  more  in  detail,  giving  the  per- 


CLIMATE    AND    THE    COMPOSITION    OF    DURUM    WHEAT. 


209" 


centage  of  nitrogen,  the  weight  per  thousand  grains,  and  the  percent- 
age of  flinty  kernels.  Enough  samples  were  harvested  so  that  part 
of  each  one  could  be  allowed  to  ripen  in  a  protected  place  (indoors) 
and  part  outdoors  or  exposed.  In  every  case  also  part  of  the 
sample  was  harvested  with  the  stems,  that  is,  the  whole  plant  was. 
harvested,  and  of  part  only  the  heads  were  collected. 

Comparison  of  ivhcats  harvested  early  and  late  awl  under  other  varying  conditions^ 

WHOLE  PLANTS  HARVESTED 


Laboratory 
No. 

Tested  for— 

Harvested  early. 

Harvested  late. 

Protected 

after 
harvest. 

Exposed 

after 
harvest. 

Protected 

after 
harvest. 

Exposed 

after 
harvest. 

S230 

821° 

8213 

(Nitrogen per  cent . . 

■[Weight  of  1,000  grains grams.. 

I  Flinty  grains per  cent . . 

(Nitrogen per  cent.. 

-  Weight  of  1.000  grains grams. . 

[Flinty  grains per  cent.. 

(Nitrogen per  cent. . 

■  Weight  of  1,000  grains grams. . 

[Flinty  grains per  cent.. 

(Nitrogen per  cent.. 

1  Weight  of  1,000  grains grams.. 

[Flinty  grains per  cent.. 

(Nitrogen per  cent. . 

■{Weight  of  1.000  grains grams. . 

[Flinty  grains per  cent. . 

2.02 
29.94 
95.00 

2.01 
30.16 
95.00 

1.91 
29.10 
95.00 

2.14 
26.50 
98.00 

2.01 
26.84 
80.00 

1.88 
30.74 
S5.00 

1.93 
28.50 
90.00 

2.08 
24.00 
90.00 

1.99 
:;:.  68 
95.00 

1.  80 
33.78 
95.  00 

2.04 
35.64 
90.00 

2.  11 
35.  98 

95.00 

1.99 

36.48 
90.00 

1.89 
34.  24 
90.00 

1.97 
36.16 
95.00 

2.09 
3a  86 
95.00 

5643 

Average. . 

2.02 
2a  92 
96.00 

1.98 
27.  52 
86.00 

1.99 
35.77 
94  00 

.   1.99 
35.19 
9a  00 

HEADS  ONLY  HARVESTED. 


8230 

(Nitrogen per  cent.. 

•{  Weight  of  1,000  grains grams. . 

[Flinty  grains per  cent. . 

(Nitrogen percent.. 

•{Weight  of  1,000  grains grams.. 

[Flinty  grains percent.. 

(Nitrogen percent.. 

•  Weight  of  1,000  grains grams.. 

[Flmtv  grains per  cent.. 

(Nitrogen per  cent.. 

^Weight  of  1,000  grains grams.. 

[Flinty  grains per  cent.. 

(Nitrogen per  cent. . 

^Weight  of  1.000  grains grams. . 

2.15 
23.  94 
100.00 

1.90 
30.90 
95.00 

1.96 
2.5.80 

2.17 
23.20 

1.94 
37.08 

1.92 
36.48 
90.00 

1.91 

34.  66 
95.00 

1.91 

35.  42 

8212   

90.00 

1.99 

27.78 
90.00 

1.93 
27.30 

85.00 

1.92 
35.64 
95.00 

2.01 
34.64 

8213 

5C43 

90.  00     !      85.  00 

2.09  •          2.02 
24  56           25.  64 

95.  00     !       85.  00 

90.00    j      90.00 

2.  14     :        2. 10 
36.94    I      a5.90 
95.  CO         100.  00 

Average. . 

2.03    i        2.03 
26.  30           25.  90 
95.00 

2.00 
36.07 
91.00 

1.96 

35.61 
94  00 

The  table  shows  that  when  only  the  heads  are  harvested  early  the 
grain  thereon  is  small  and  shriveled,  whereas  if  harvested  late  the 
grain  is  plump.  The  reason  for  this  is  that  the  heads  harvested  early 
being  cut  off  from  the  stems,  the  supply  of  elaborated  food  in  the 
latter  is  actually  lost  to  the  grain.  The  grain,  therefore,  is  unable  to 
increase  in  weight.  On  the  other  hand,  the  heads  which  had  ripened 
on  the  stem,  that  is,  those  harvested  late,  had  received  from  the  latter 
much  of  the  elaborated  material.  The  difference  in  the  number  of 
flinty  kernels  in  the  grain  harvested  early  and  late  when  the  samples 
were  protected  is  too  small  to  afford  any  conclusions;  but  when  the 
3  A1906 14 


210  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

samples  were  exposed,  the  one  harvested  early  had  a  smaller  number 
of  flinty  kernels.  This  was  true  likewise  of  the  samples  harvested  on 
the  stems:  the  one  which  was  harvested  early  and  exposed  contained 
.aller  amount  of  flinty  grains  than  the  one  collected  at  full  ma- 
turity. This  was  due  to  the  effect  of  weathering,  as  it  is  well  known 
that  intermittent  rains  have  an  injurious  effect  on  the  grain  in  the 
shock,  much  more  so  than  when  the  grain  is  still  standing.  The  grain 
which  was  harvested  late  was  not  materially  affected,  so  far  as  its 
flinty  character  is  concerned,  by  exposure,  whether  the  heads  only  or 
the  whole  plants  were  collected.  Likewise  there  is  little  difference  in 
the  weight  per  thousand  or  the  percentage  of  nitrogen,  showing  that 
at  full  maturity  no  more  change  goes  on  in  the  plant. 

This  table  also  shows  that  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  or  protein  is 
practically  the  same  in  every  sample  whether  harvested  early  or  late, 
heads  separate  or  the  whole  plant,  and  whether  these  samples  were 
protected  or  exposed.  The  chief  difference  here  is  the  the  weight  per 
thousand,  the  samples  harvested  late  weighing  7  to  10  grams  more 
than  the  early  ones.  This  simply  means  that  on  ripening  the  elabo- 
rated organic  material  in  the  leaves,  stems,  and  heads  is  transported 
to  the  grain  and  that  this  material  is  also  rich  in  proteid  substances. 
The  number  of  starchy  grains,  that  is.  those  having  white  spots,  is  not 
very  great  in  any  case,  as  is  shown  by  the  percentage  of  flinty  kernels. 
The  samples  harvested  early  and  exposed  have  the  greatest  number 
of  starchy  grains. 

From  the  table  on  page  209  it  will  be  clearly  seen  that  the  sam- 
ples of  heads  only,  which  are  harvested  early,  yield  a  grain  which  is 
appreciably  smaller  than  when  the  whole  plant  is  harvested  early. 
The  same  explanation  here  holds  true  as  was  made  above  when  con- 
sidering early  and  late  harvesting  of  heads  only,  but  to  a  less  degree. 
In  this  case  only  a  comparatively  small  part  of  the  elaborated  mate- 
rial is  transported  from  the  stem  to  the  grain,  giving  it  a  higher 
weight  per  thousand,  that  is.  the  weight  per  thousand  grains  where 
the  heads  only  were  harvested  early  is  26.3  grams,  whereas  when  the 
whole  plant  is  harvested  at  the  same  time  the  weight  per  thousand 
ha-  increased  to  28.9  grams.  Such  experiments  clearly  show  that 
harvesting  by  means  of  ■"header.-"  should  be  carried  on  only  when 
the  grain  is  fully  mature,  as  otherwise  an  incompletely  developed  or 
shriveled  grain  will  be  obtained. 

VALUE    OF    DURUM    WHEAT. 

Professor  Shepard.  of  South  Dakota,  has  recently  issued  a  report  on 
durum  wheat,  in  which  it  is  shown  that  Kubanka  contains  less  bran 
than  Red  Fife,  that  more  flour  is  made  from  Kubanka.  and  that  the 
flour  contains  a  larger  amount  of  the  proteid  of  the  wheat  than  does 
flour  made  from  northern  spring  wheat.     Baking  tests,  however,  show 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  X. 


Photomicrographs  of  Cross  Sections  of  Wheat  Grown  Under 

Varying  Conditions. 

[1.— Flinty  wheat  grain  grown  under  dry  farming.    2.— Half-starchy  wheat 

grain.    3.— Starchy  wheat  grain  grown  under  excessive  irrigation.] 


Yearbook   U.   S.   Oept.  of  Agriculture,    1906 


Plate  XI 


k 


Whole  Wheat  showing  (1)  Flinty,  (2)  Half  Starchy,  and 
(3)  Starchy  Grains.    (X4i.) 


CLIMATE    AND    THE    COMPOSITION    OF    DURUM    WHEAT.  211 

that  spring  wheat  makes  a  larger  loaf  and  contains  a  larger  amount  of 
gliadin  in  the  gluten  than  is  the  case  with  Kubanka  wheat.  Taking 
it  all  in  all,  however,  Professor  Shepard  states  that  "for  the  yield, 
hardiness,  flour  yield,  protein  distribution,  and  the  quality  of  both 
bread  and  macaroni,  durum  wheat,  especially  Kubanka,  is  to  be 
recommended  for  general  use." 

Several  years  ago  Clifford  Richardson,  of  the  Bureau  of  Chemistry, 
published  the  results  of  several  hundred  analyses  of  wheat  grown  in 
the  various  States  of  the  Union,  from  which  it  appears  that  the  aver- 
age protein  content  of  our  American  spring  and  winter  wheat  (  Tri- 
ticum  vulgare)  is  12.2  per  cent,  whereas  the  average  proteid  content  of 
considerably  over  one  hundred  samples  of  durum  analyzed  by  the 
writer  is  14.7,  or  2.5  per  cent  more  than  that  of  the  common  wheat. 

Durum  wheat  grown  in  Algeria  contains  only  from  8  to  10  per  cent 
of  water.  Common  wheat  grown  in  countries  adapted  thereto  con- 
tains from  10  to  16  per  cent  of  water,  according  to  the  moisture  of  the 
atmosphere.  The  difference  in  the  water  content  was  sufficient  to 
make  the  French  officials  hrrestigate  the  advisability  of  buying  wheat 
from  dry-land  regions,  which  wheats  would  contain  less  moisture,  and 
thus  not  only  a  large  saving  would  be  made  in  the  cost  of  transporta- 
tion, but  more  wheat  per  bushel  would  be  actually  obtained. 

IRRIGATION    EXPERIMENTS. 

As  climate  is  the  great  factor  in  influencing  the  composition  of  crops, 
and  as  we  are  powerless  to  change  it  in  any  way,  it  devolves  upon  us 
to  make  as  wise  a  selection  of  our  grains  as  possible,  choosing  those 
which  are  more  apt  to  resist  the  unfavorable  elements.  Though  we 
can  not  control  rainfall,  we  are  able  in  irrigated  districts  to  determine 
how  much  water  a  crop  shall  receive  by  irrigation.  As  excessive 
irrigation  tends  to  change  the  hard,  flinty  durum  into  a  soft,  mealy 
grain,  thus  robbing  it  of  its  most  important  physical  characteristic,  as 
well  as  lowering  its  nitrogen  content  below  that  of  a  true  durum,  it  is 
important  to  carefully  determine  the  amounts  of  water  that  should  be 
given  to  a  wheat  crop  and  the  times  during  the  period  of  growth  when 
it  should  be  applied.  This  question  is  the  subject  of  an  investigation 
which  is  being  conducted  in  cooperation  with  several  of  the  Western 
States  where  irrigation  is  practiced  and  facilities  exist  for  irrigating 
with  definite  amounts  of  water  at  stated  periods. 

ILLUSTRATIONS    OF    OVER-IRRIGATED    GRAINS. 

The  photomicrographs  shown  in  Plate  X  represent  cross  sections  of 
grain  grown  under  dry-land  farming  and  under  irrigation.  Figure  1 
represents  a  durum  grown  on  land  not  irrigated,  being  flinty,  hard,  and 
translucent,  and  containing  over  18  per  cent  of  protein.     No.  2  is  an 


212  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

intermediate  grain,  showing  both  the  starchy  and  the  flinty  charac- 
teristics. Xo.  3  represents  a  grain  from  the  same  kind  of  seed  as  that 
which  produced  No.  1  and  grown  on  adjacent  land,  but  under  ex  - 
sive  irrigation,  the  result  being  a  soft,  mealy,  dull-looking  grain,  some- 
what shorter  than  Xo.  1  and  containing  only  12  per  cent  of  protein. 
It  has  lost  its  durum  characteristics  entirely,  and  is  no  more  suitable 
for  making  good  macaroni  than  are  our  soft  wheats.  Plate  XI  is  a 
reproduction  of  an  enlarged  photograph  of  the  whole  wheat  grains, 
and  represents  the  same  samples  as  are  shown  in  Plate  X.  Xo.  1 
showing  the  dark  amber  color  of  the  flinty  grain.  Xo.  2  the  inter- 
mediate sample,  and  No.  3  the  light  starchy  grain.  Both  the  photo- 
micrographs and  the  photographs  shown  in  these  plates  were  made 
by  Burton  J.  Howard,  chief  of  the  microchemical  laboratory  of  the 
Bureau  of  Chemistry. 

NECESSITY  OF    PRODUCING    HIGH-PROTEIX    WHEATS. 

In  conclusion,  it  may  be  well  to  emphasize  the  fact  that  the  coun- 
tries which  are  the  great  buyers  of  wheat  purchase  generally  on  the 
basis  of  protein  content,  that  is.  on  the  basis  of  the  weight  per 
bushel  and  the  weight  per  thousand  grains,  while  in  some  localities 
wheats  are  bought  on  the  basis  of  the  chemical  analysis  itself.  It  is 
therefore  of  the  utmost  importance,  in  order  to  retain  our  foreign 
markets  and  maintain  our  commercial  supremacy  and  national  repu- 
tation as  producers  of  high-grade  wheat,  that  the  closest  attention  be 
paid  not  only  to  the  production  of  high-yielding  wheats  but  al- 
the  cultivation  of  varieties  having  a  high  protein  content,  with  a  v 
to  growing  wheats  which  combine  these  two  characteristics — high 
gluten  content  and  large  yields. 


THE  GAME  WARDEN  OF  TO-DAY. 

By  R.  W.  Williams,  Jr., 

Assistant,  Biological  Survey. 

INTRODUCTION. 

For  several  hundred  rears  the  enforcement  of  criminal  laws  of 
all  kinds  in  this  country  has  been  intrusted  to  sheriffs,  constables, 
and  police  officers,  and  until  the  middle  of  the  nineteenth  century 
this  method  was  considered  satisfactory.  But  with  the  growing 
demand  for  more  stringent  enactments  for  the  preservation  of  game 
and  the  increasing  complexity  of  statutes  for  this  purpose  it  was 
found  no  longer  practicable  to  include  the  burden  of  enforcing  them 
among  the  duties  devolving  upon  general  officers,  and  their  enforce- 
ment has  consequently  been  intrusted  to  special  officials,  usually 
called  game  wardens. 

The  origin  of  the  term  "warden"  in  relation  to  game  is  somewhat 
obscure,  but  it  was  probably  adopted  in  analogy  to  church  and  wood 
wardens  in  England,  where  the  word  first  came  into  use.  However 
this  ma}'  be,  a  game  warden  is  now  generally  understood  to  be  an 
officer  charged  with  the  enforcement  of  laws  for  the  protection  of 
game  and  fish.  Several  substitutes  for  the  term  are  in  use  in  a  few 
States  and  Canadian  Provinces.  Thus  in  New  York  all,  and  in  Xew 
Jersey  and  Pennsylvania  some,  game  officers  are  styled  "  protectors;" 
in  Xew  Hampshire  the  designation  "detectives"  is  employed;  in 
Prince  Edward  Island,  "inspectors,"  and  in  Alberta,  Manitoba,  and 
Saskatchewan,  "game  guardians." 

Wardenships  for  the  protection  of  fish  existed  quite  early  in  the 
histoiw  of  this  country,  and  some  time  after  the  establishment  of 
similar  offices  for  the  protection  of  game  the  duties  of  the  two  were 
united  and  intrusted  to  the  same  officers.  Consequently  to-day,  in 
all  but  a  few  States,  the  game  warden  is  a  fish  warden  also  and  per- 
forms manifold  duties  in  that  capacity.  The  present  article  does 
not  deal  with  this  phase  of  his  duties,  but  is  limited  in  scope  to  those 
he  performs  solely  as  a  game  warden. 

In  the  United  States  the  establishment  of  a  special  office  for  the 
protection  of  game  and  the  enforcement  of  the  game  laws  dates  back 
to  1852,  when  the  legislature  of  Maine  created  the  office  of  moose 

213 


214  VEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

warden,  directed  the  governor  to  appoint  one  for  each  of  the  counties 
of  Oxford,  Franklin.  Somerset.  Penobscot,  Piscataquis.  Aroostook, 
and  Washington,  and  allowed  the  warden  three-fourths  of  the  fines 
recovered  for  killing  moose  and  deer  contrary  to  law.  This  seems  to 
be  the  first  game  wardenship  established  in  this  country.  For  three 
decades  there  was  very  little  further  activity  in  this  direction.  A 
few  State-  authorised  the  appointment  of  local  wardens,  but  the 
experiment  was  almost  entirely  a  failure.  During  the  period  between 
1878  and  1888,  however,  the  urgent  necessity  for  enforcement  of 
game  laws  became  apparent,  and  in  that  decade  ten  States  created 
a  State  office  or  department  charged  with  the  enforcement  of  the 
game  laws.  Other  State-  quickly  followed,  and  at  the  present  time 
in  thirty-six  States  and  Territories  the  enforcement  of  the  game  laws 
is  intrusted  to  a  State  board,  a  warden,  or.  as  in  North  Carolina  and 
Delaware,  to  an  incorporated  association.  Florida.  Georgia,  Ken- 
tucky. Louisiana.  Nevada,  and  South  Dakota  .-till  adhere  to  the 
county  warden  system,  and  Texas.  Alabama,  and  Arkansas  provide 
no  special  officer  for  protection  of  game.  Correlated  with  the  estab- 
lishment of  these  offices  has  been  the  increasing  complexity  of  game 
law.-,  until  at  the  present  time  the  modern  game  statute  assumes  the 
magnitude  of  a  criminal  code,  and  to  enforce  its  provisions  and  exer- 
cise the  powers  thereunder  requires  a  high  degree  of  judgment  and 
skill.  The  necessary  qualifications  of  an  officer  in  this  department 
of  the  State's  service  are  consequently  much  greater  to-day  than 
formerly.  This  is  apparent  from  an  examination  of  the  one  hundred 
and  fifty-six  sections  of  the  Colorado  game  law.  which,  it  may  be 
noted,  do  not  include  the  provisions  relating  to  nongame  birds. 

THE    OFFICE    OF    GAME    WARDEN. 

Since  the  establishment  of  State  offices  or  departments  for  the  pro- 
tection of  game,  the  position  of  warden,  whether  the  jurisdiction 
extends  over  the  entire  State  or  is  confined  to  a  .-mall  area,  has 
assumed  an  importance  and  dignity  it  did  not  formerly  pose 
Fortified  by  plenary  power  to  enforce  the  game  laws,  and  with  a 
consciousness  of  the  important  public  service  performed,  the  warden 
of  to-day  stands  upon  an  equal  footing  with  other  executive  officers 
of  the  Government,  and  commands  like  respect.  The  salary  attached 
to  the  position  of  State  commissioner  or  warden  in  those  States  pro- 
viding for  a  salary  compares  favorably  with  the  compensation  of 
other  State  officials.  In  Xew  York  it  is  So. 000  a  year,  in  Illinois 
sl'.oOO,  and  in  other  States  it  varies  from  $1,000  to  12,060.  In  the 
States  which  intrust  the  administration  of  the  game  laws  to  a  board 
of  commissioners,  position  on  the  board,  except  in  Connecticut. 
Ma--aehusetts.  and  Maine,  is  honorary  and  without  compensation. 
Such  is  the  case  in  Arizona.  California,  Xew  Hampshire,  Xew  Jersey, 


THE    GAME    WARDEN    OF    TO-DAY.  ZIO 

Minnesota,  Ohio,  Pennsylvania,  and  Rhode  Island,  but  even  under 
these  circumstances  the  States  have  no  difficulty  in  securing  ready  and 
capable  men. 

The  compensation  of  deputies  varies  more  than  that  of  the  State 
officers,  and  the  system  of  payment  adopted  by  each  State  has  fea- 
tures distinct  from  those  of  any  other.  A  few  States  pay  their 
deputies  salaries.  In  Montana  each  of  the  eight  district  wardens 
receives  a  salary  of  8100  a  month,  and  in  California  the  salary  of 
county  warden  is  graduated  according  to  the  population  of  the  county, 
$50  to  $125  per  month,  with  an  additional  allowance  of  $25  for  ex- 
penses. Colorado  allows  each  of  her  five  chief  wardens  S900  a  year 
and  S300  for  expenses,  besides  a  share  of  fines  and  officer's  costs.  In 
Illinois  the  ten  district  game  wardens  receive  $900  a  year  each  and 
their  actual  and  necessary  expenses  while  under  the  direction  of  the 
commissioner.  Game  protectors  in  New  York,  except  the  chief,  first, 
second,  and  third  assistant  protectors,  who  receive  annual  salaries  of 
$5,000,  $2,000.  $1.400, and  $1,200,  respectively,  are  paid  $600  a  year, 
and  receive  one-half  of  the  fines  in  actions  brought  upon  information 
furnished  by  them;  and  they  are  allowed  also  $450  a  year  for  their 
expenses.  In  some  States  the  deputies  receive  the  whole  or  part  of 
the  lines,  together  with  tho  usual  fees  of  a  sheriff  or  constable.  In 
Tennessee  the  State  warden  serves  without  compensation. 

The  terms  of  service  are  usually  the  same  as  those  of  other  officers. 
The  State  warden  of  Tennessee,  however,  is  appointed  for  eight  years, 
a  longer  term  than  is  usual  for  any  State  officer. 

It  may  be  of  interest  to  note,  as  showing  the  type  of  men  required 
for  this  work,  that  the  present  warden  of  Tennessee  was  a  former 
member  of  the  Federal  House  of  Representatives;  that  one  of  the 
Members  of  Congress  from  Michigan  was  the  fust  warden  of  that 
State;  that  the  present  game  commissioner  of  one  of  the  States  was 
formerly  United  States  minister  to  Turkey;  and  that  several  promi- 
nent lawyers  and  physicians  are  serving  their  States  in  the  capacity 
of  State  warden  or  as  members  of  boards  of  game  and  fish  commis- 
sioners. The  governor  of  Nebraska  is  nominally  fish  and  game  com- 
missioner of  that  State,  but  the  active  work  of  the  office  devolves 
upon  his  chief  deputy.  This  somewhat  anomalous  condition  is  due  to 
a  constitutional  prohibition  against  the  creation  of  any  executive 
State  office  not  provided  for  in  the  constitution.  Hence  the  law  of 
1901  establishing  the  office  of  game  and  fish  commissioner  provided 
that  the  duties  of  the  position  should  devolve  upon  the  governor. 

DUTIES. 

The  duties  of  a  game  warden  are  those  usually  performed  by  a 
sheriff,  but  they  differ  in  one  important  particular,  and  this  differ- 
ence inheres  in  the  object  for  which  the  wardenship  was  established. 


216  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

eriff  ordinarily  acts  only  in  pursuance  of  preliminary  proceed- 
ings by  private  persons  or  by  a  court  officer  and  usually  under  a 
warrant  issued  by  a  court  commanding  him  to  arrest  a  certain  person, 
summon  a  jury,  or  perform  similar  acts:  but  a  warden  can  not  await 
the  initiative  or  detection  of  a  violation  by  others.  He  must  act, 
must  himself  search  out  violations,  find  the  evidence  wherewith  to 
convict  offenders,  and  institute  prosecutions.  This  is  one  of  the 
primary  reasons  for  the  existence  of  a  special  officer  to  enforce  the 
game  laws. 

During  the  open  season  much  of  the  game  warden's  time  is  spent 
in  examining  shipments,  and  if  his  territory  includes  a  railway  cen- 
ter this  service  is  arduous  and  requires  much  night  work.  The 
devices  employed  by  shippers  to  conceal  contraband  trade  in  game 
compel  wardens  to  examine  many  packages  the  contents  of  which 
are  not  exposed  to  view.  It  frequently  happens  that  the  warden 
must  perform  detective  duty  in  order  to  secure  the  evidence  necessary 
to  convict  suspected  parties,  and  this  means  that  occasionally  he  is 
subjected  to  all  the  dangers  of  such  service.  In  States  prohibiting 
sale  or  possession  of  game  he  must  periodically  visit  and  inspect 
hotels,  restaurants,  and  other  resorts  where  it  is  likely  to  be  served 
to  guests,  and  must  keep  a  watchful  eve  on  markets  and  cold-storage 
plants.  In  a  few  States  and  in  several  of  the  Canadian  Provinces 
wardens  issue  hunting  licenses,  and  in  consequence  are  compelled  to 
keep  accounts.  By  the  passage  of  laws  in  several  States  prohibiting 
the  hounding  of  deer  and  directing  the  wardens  to  kill  dogs  found 
chasing  or  molesting  deer  or  found  in  the  deer  country,  another  task, 
and  often  a  disagreeable  one,  is  added  to  the  warden's  duty.  The 
secretary  of  the  game  commission  of  Pennsylvania,  in  January,  1906, 
estimated  that  1.500  dogs  had  been  killed  in  that  State  during  the 
few  months  of  the  operation  of  the  law.  Examination  of  hunting 
licenses  issued  to  nonresidents  requires  the  warden's  attention,  and 
it  is  always  necessary  for  him  to  make  sure  that  all  persons  found 
hunting  are  provided  with  proper  licenses.  In  many  States  wardens 
are  required  to  destroy  traps  and  devices  employed  to  capture  game, 
and  in  a  few  to  seize  guns  and  shooting  paraphernalia  used  in  viola- 
tion of  law.  They  often  perform  the  duties  of  auctioneers  in  the 
sale  of  confiscated  game,  guns,  traps,  nets,  etc.  Occasionally  when 
an  offender  against  the  game  laws  has  escaped  into  another  State 
the  warden  is  required  to  enter  that  State  and.  with  proper  requisi- 
tion papers,  apprehend  and  bring  back  the  fugitive.  In  nearly 
every  State  wardens  are  empowered  to  serve  criminal  and  civil  proc- 

ist  as  a  sheriff  would,  and  this  requires  knowledge  of  the  proper 
procedure. 

Every  statute  providing  for  the  appointment  of  a  warden  defines 
his  duties,  some  more  explicitly  and  in  greater  detail  than  others; 


THE    GAME    WARDEN    OF    TO-DAY.  217 

but  the  officer  who  would  perform  the  greatest  service  to  the  State 
must  do  many  things  not  laid  down  in  the  law.  As  a  rule,  the  active 
field  work  of  the  game  department  is  performed  by  deputies  under 
instructions  from  the  State  warden,  but  the  laws  of  Idaho  and  Wyo- 
ming declare  that  the  State  warden  shall  be  an  active  executive  officer, 
and  when  possible  shall  take  the  field  in  person  in  performance  of 
his  duties. 

An  officer  who  realizes  the  responsibility  of  his  position  can  do 
much  to  bring  game  protection  into  popular  favor.  He  may  easily 
become  an  educator,  however  circumscribed  his  field.  Much  of  the 
wanton  destruction  of  animal  life  proceeds  from  thoughtlessness, 
and  few  persons  once  impressed  with  the  importance  of  preserving 
wild  creatures  continue  to  destroy  them.  In  North  Carolina  the 
bird  and  game  wardens,  in  addition  to  their  official  duties,  spend  a 
considerable  portion  of  their  time  educating  the  public  as  to  the  value 
of  birds  and  game  to  the  State.  During  the  close  seasons  they  visit 
farmers,  explain  and  discuss  the  game  laws  and  their  object,  and 
hear  complaints.  Each  warden  is  supplied  with  a  selection  of  stand- 
ard books  on  birds  and  is  required  to  familiarize  himself  with  them, 
so  as  to  be  able  to  answer  the  numerous  questions  propounded. 

A  very  useful  and  interesting  feature  of  a  warden's  duties  in  Illinois 
is  the  periodical  census  made  by  him  of  certain  species  of  game.  In 
this  way  the  commissioner,  with  reasonable  accuracy,  can  determine 
the  status  of  certain  species  and  recommend  necessary  legislation. 
Similar  service  is  performed  by  the  wardens  in  Pennsylvania.  The 
general  adoption  of  this  scheme  over  the  entire  country  would  greatly 
facilitate  the  drafting  of  proper  laws  and  in  addition  furnish  very 
interesting  statistics. 

Another  valuable  service  performed  by  the  Illinois  wardens  con- 
sists in  rendering  aid  to  the  farmers  in  enforcing  the  trespass  laws. 
Telephone  connection  makes  it  possible  to  quickly  reach  the  scene 
of  a  trespass,  and  ready  response  has  greatly  reduced  the  number  of 
such  offenses  in  that  State.  The  Illinois  and  Wisconsin  wardens,  as 
part  of  their  duties,  periodically  examine  and  check  up  the  hunting- 
license  accounts  of  the  county  clerks. 

The  rapid  decrease  in  the  number  of  quail  in  several  States,  due 
to  starvation  in  severe  winters  with  heavy  snows,  has  awakened  the 
citizens  of  those  States  to  a  realization  of  the  necessity  of  providing 
food  for  the  starving  birds  during  such  periods.  The  game  depart- 
ments in  some  of  the  States  have  adopted  a  systematic  plan  for  pur- 
chasing and  distributing  this  food  by  the  aid  of  wardens.  During 
the  winter  of  1904-5,  which  was  very  severe  and  protracted  as  far 
south  as  North  Carolina,  thirty  wardens  in  that  State  devoted  much 
of  their  time  to  distributing  grain  for  the  quail  and  in  enlisting  the 
cooperation  of  the  farmers  in  their  behalf.     During  the  same  winter 


21S  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

some  of  the  wardens  of  Mew  Jersey  .purchased  grain  at  their  own 
expense  and  distributed  it  widely  in  their  territory,  and  the  Indiana 
wardens  employed  men  with  sleighs  to  distribute  food  for  the  quail. 
In  Illinois  quail  were  systematically  fed  by  the  game  department  dur- 
ing that  winter.  An  expenditure  of  $25  in  each  county  was  author- 
ized by  the  State  game  commissioner  to  be  used  in  February,  and 
with  the  means  thus  supplied  the  wardens  were  able  to  scatter  a  large 
amount  of  grain  throughout  the  region  inhabited  by  quail.  The 
mounted  police  on  duty  in  the  neighborhood  of  Washington,  in  the 
District  of  Columbia,  under  instructions  from  their  superintendent, 
who  is  ex-officio  game  warden  of  the  District,  carry  with  them  regu- 
larly, during  severe  weather,  bags  of  grain  from  which  they  scatter 
food  for  the  quail. 

POWER.-. 

The  powers  exercised  by  the  wardens  of  the  present  day  are  very 
extensive.  Indeed,  were  it  not  so.  enforcement  of  game  laws  and  the 
consequent  preservation  of  game  would  be  impossible.  It  is  the 
exception  now  for  a  State  to  withhold  from  its  game  wardens  the  right 
to  arrest  without  warrant  persons  found  in  the  act  of  violating  the  law. 
and  a  number  of  States  confer  upon  their  wardens  the  right  to  search 
summarily  any  place  where  they  suspect  contraband  game  to  be  con- 
cealed. In  Xew  York  the  power  of  search  without  warrant  under  the 
game  law*  is  granted  to  game  protectors,  but  is  withheld  from  peace 
officers,  who  otherwise  exercise  all  the  powers  of  protectors  in  the 
enforcement  of  the  game  laws.  Several  States  have  excepted  dwell- 
ings from  the  general  warrant  of  search,  thus  preserving  the  ancient 
and  time-honored  sanctity  of  the  home.  "While  the  warden  may  be 
lawfully  invested  with  broad  powers,  it  behooves  him  to  use  tact  and 
discretion  in  exercising  them,  so  as  to  give  no  just  grounds  for  com- 
plaints of  oppression. 

In  Michigan  and  Wisconsin  wardens  are  authorized  to  conduct 
prosecutions  in  the  courts  in  the  same  manner  and  with  the  same 
authority  as  prosecuting  attorneys,  and  in  Oklahoma  and  West  Vir- 
ginia they  may  do  so  without  the  sanction  of  the  prosecuting  attorney. 
In  Tennessee  the  State  warden  may  compromise  or  discontinue  cases 
where  the  violations  are  technical  or  where  he  believes  the  prosecution 
or  fine  would  be  oppressive.  In  Maine  the  commissioners  of  inland 
fisheries  and  game  may  entirely  prohibit  the  taking  of  any  kind  of 
game  in  any  part  of  the  State  for  a  series  of  years,  not  exceeding  four. 
These  are  some  of  the  extensive  powers  granted  wardens,  and  they 
illustrate  the  position  of  the  service  at  the  present  day.  In  this 
connection  may  well  be  quoted  the  instructions  given  the  deputy  and 
county  wardens  of  Michigan  by  the  game  warden  of  that  State: 

The  proper  observance  of  the  fish  and  game  laws  depends  almost  entirely  upon  the 
vigilance  and  good  judgment  pi  the  county  and  deputy  wardens.  Keep  your  eyes  and 
ears  open  for  violations,  but  do  not  be  too  hasty  in  acting  upon  what  you  hear.     Be 


THE    GAME    WARDEN    OF    TO-DAY.  219 

careful  nut  to  let  the  public  know  your  plans.  Be  vigilant  and  fearless  in  enforcing 
the  laws,  hut  try  to  do  so  without  being  obnoxious.  Be  gentlemanly  at  all  times. 
Show  no  favoritism,  and  be  especially  careful  that  all  persons  are  treated  alike.  It  is 
important  that  the  people  should  be  awakened  to  the  importance  of  respecting  the 
laws  for  the  preservation  of  iish  and  game.  Use  your  influence  to  arouse  public 
sentiment  in  this  respect.  (Game  'Warden  Dept.  of  Mich.— Instructions  to  Wardens, 
1903. ) 

SPECIAL    EQUIPMENT. 

The  equipment  of  the  game  warden  diners  very  little  from  that  of 
other  officers  who  enforce  criminal  statutes,  but  on  account  of  the 
character  of  the  territory  to  be  patrolled  several  States  in  the  past  few 
years  have  provided  launches  for  wardens  doing  duty  on  water  courses. 
Massachusetts  for  several  years  has  kept  in  service  along  the  coast  a 
naphtha  launch,  the  efficiency  of  which  the  commissioners  of  that 
State  declare  to  be  equal  to  that  of  a  hundred  men.  The  Audubon 
Society  of  North  Carolina,  an  incorporated  body,  which,  under  the 
terms  of  its  charter,  administers  the  game  laws  in  that  State,  main- 
tains a  launch  for  the  use  of  its  wardens  along  the  Atlantic  coast. 
This  boat  is  used  in  winter  for  patrolling  the  ducking  grounds  in 
the  larger  inlets  along  the  coast  of  Xorth  Carolina,  where  wild  fowl 
resort  in  great  numbers  and  are  extensively  shot  for  market ;  and  in 
summer  it  does  duty  in  the  region  about  Cape  Hatteras  and  Ocracoke 
Inlet  and  around  the  islands  in  Pamlico  Sound,  where  large  numbers 
of  sea  birds  rear  their  young.  The  game  commissioner  of  Illinois  has 
recently  provided  a  cabin  cruising  launch  for  the  use  of  the  wardens 
along  the  Illinois  River,  and  early  in  1906  New  York  authorized  the 
purchase  of  a  steam  or  electric  launch  for  the  use  of  the  two  game 
protectors  on  Jamaica  Bay  and  adjacent  waters,  and  appropriated 
$1,500  for  the  purpose. 

The  police  department  of  the  District  of  Columbia  maintains  a 
launch  for  service  on  the  Potomac  River  largely  to  enforce  the  game 
laws  on  the  marshes  along  the  river. 

The  National  Association  of  Audubon  Societies,  always  desirous  to 
cooperate  with  game  wardens,  owns  a  launch  with  which  its  warden 
patrols  the  southern  coast  of  Florida  in  the  interests  of  the  nongame 
birds  of  that  State;  and  in  Louisiana  its  warden,  who  has  supervision 
of  the  Breton  Island  Reservation  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico,  is  the  owner 
and  captain  of  a  schooner  which  he  uses  in  his  work  of  protection. 

CIVIL-SERVICE    SYSTEM    FOR    GAME    WARDENS. 

With  increasing  necessity  for  enforcement  of  the  game  laws  and  the 
corresponding  intricacy  of  these  laws  arises  increased  necessity  for 
more  intelligent  officers  to  execute  them.  The  civil-service  rules, 
winch  have  worked  so  well  in  other  departments  of  the  State  govern- 
ment, have  recently  been  applied  to  the  game  departments  of  Massa- 
chusetts and  Wisconsin,  and  their  example  will,  without  doubt,  soon 


220  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

be  followed  by  other  States.  The  system,  besides  insuring  a  higher 
grade  of  officers,  has  the  advantage  also  of  eliminating  politics  from 
the  service.  An  examination  of  the  questions  propounded  to  candi- 
dates for  the  position  of  game  warden  in  Wisconsin  shows  that  in  that 
State  great  importance  is  attached  to  ability  to  endure  exposure  and 
hard  plvysical  exertion.  Some  account  is  taken  of  the  applicant's 
familiarity  with  the  game  laws  and  conditions  in  his  territory,  and 
enough  arithmetic  is  required  to  test  his  ability  to  keep  his  accounts. 
On  the  other  hand,  in  Massachusetts  less  importance  is  attached  to 
physical  endurance,  but  applicants  for  the  position  of  deputy  fish  and 
game  commissioner  are  required  to  answer  exhaustive  questions  on 
their  powers  and  jurisdiction  under  the  game  laws,  and  in  relation 
to  the  preliminary  procedure  in  the  courts. 

Applicants  should  be  examined  upon  the  subjects  usually  included 
in  the  common-school  course.  Physical  fitness  and  such  previous 
experience  as  would  be  serviceable  in  the  position  sought  should 
have  due  weight.  Other  qualifications  being  equal,  the  applicant 
who  is  an  experienced  hunter  should  command  precedence  over  one 
who  is  not. 

In  order  to  secure  the  largest  measure  of  efficiency  in  the  game 
department,  civil-service  questions  should  be  framed  to  test  the 
applicant's  qualifications  to  perform  any  and  all  services  likely  to 
devolve  upon  him  in  the  performance  of  his  duties.  They  should 
elicit  his  knowledge  of  the  powers,  duties,  and  jurisdiction  apper- 
taining to  the  position  of  warden  and  the  methods  of  procedure  in 
case  of  violation  of  the  game  laws.  He  should  have  a  general  knowl- 
edge of  the  object  of  game  laws,  and  should  show  fair  acquaintance 
with  the  fauna  of  his  territory,  especially  with  the  species  classed  as 
game;  he  should  be  familiar  with  the  limit  of  hunting  seasons,  with 
prohibited  devices  and  methods,  limitations  on  amount  of  game  per- 
mitted to  be  killed,  and  restrictions  on  hunting  by  residents  and 
nonresidents,  and  on  sale  and  transportation.  If  the  examination  is 
for  one  of  the  higher  positions  in  the  service,  such  as  chief  warden, 
the  applicant  should  know  something  of  the  decisions  of  the  higher 
courts  in  cases  involving  game,  at  least  in  his  own  State. 

ASSOCIATIONS    OF    WARDENS. 

In  the  early  part  of  December,  1892,  the  fish  and  game  wardens 
of  the  two  Dakotas,  Minnesota,  Wisconsin,  Iowa,  and  Illinois  met  in 
convention  at  St.  Paul,  Minn.,  for  the  purpose  of  considering  a  uni- 
form game  law  for  the  States  mentioned.  A  bill  providing  for  such 
a  law  was  agreed  upon,  but  failed  of  adoption  in  the  several  States. 
Since  this  meeting  similar  conventions  have  been  held  in  other  sec- 
tions of  the  country,  with  like  objects  in  view,  but  no  permanent 
association  was  organized  until  July  21,  1902,  when  the  State  wardens 


THE    GAME    WARDEN    OF    TO-DAY.  221 

and  commissioners  of  Colorado,  Minnesota,  Montana,  Oregon,  Utah, 
and  Wyoming,  together  with  several  other  persons  interested  in  game 
protection,  met  at  Mammoth  Hot  Springs  in  the  Yellowstone  National 
Park,  pursuant  to  previous  agreement.  A  permanent  organization 
was  effected  under  the  name  of  the  National  Association  of  Game 
and  Fish  Wardens  and  Commissioners.  Papers  were  read  and  dis- 
cussed on  various  phases  of  game  protection,  spring  shooting,  hunting- 
licenses,  export  and  sale,  bag  limits,  and  the  right  of  search.  The 
primary  object  of  the  association. was  to  secure  cooperation  between 
the  States.  The  constitution  adopted  made  all  State  and  Federal 
game  officials  eligible  to  membership,  and  fixed  the  entrance  fee  at 
$10.  The  discussions  at  this  meeting  had  a  marked  effect  upon  sub- 
sequent legislation  and  have  resulted  in  more  stringent  enforcement 
of  the  game  laws.  This  association  was  reorganized  on  February  11, 
1904,  and,  with  dues  reduced  to  $5,  now  numbers  among  its  meni- 
bers  the  State  game  officials  of-most  of  the  States  where  such  office 
exists. 

A  personal  acquaintance  with  the  deputy  and  county  wardens  in 
the  State  is  always  of  great  advantage  to  the  State  officer  in  the 
administration  of  his  duties,  and  in  recent  years  several  officials  have 
called  conventions  of  their  deputies  for  this  end  and  to  discuss  mat- 
ters pertaining  to  then  duties.  One  of  the  first  meetings  of  this 
character  of  which  the  writer  has  any  knowledge  occurred  in  Mon- 
tana in  1901,  shortly  after  the  creation  of  the  offices  of  State  and 
district  game  wardens,  when,  in  compliance  with  the  summons 
of  the  State  game  and  fish  warden,  the  eight  deputies  met  at  his 
office  in  Helena  for  the  purpose  of  mutual  acquaintance  and  instruc- 
tion by  him  in  the  duties  of  then  position. 

Quite  the  most  notable  and  successful  of  these  conventions  met 
in  the  Armory  Building  at  Springfield,  111.,  on  January  26,  1904,  pur- 
suant to  a  call  issued  by  the  game  and  fish  commissioner  of  that 
State.  There  were  seventy-five  wardens  present,  and  after  organ- 
ization the  commissioner  stated  that  the  object  of  the  meeting  was 
to  become  acquainted,  discuss  matters  of  general  interest  in  game 
protection,  study  carefully  the  new  game  law  in  order  that  all  might 
understand  its  provisions,  and  outline  a  general  policy  for  its 
enforcement.  Some  very  interesting  and  important  papers  touching 
various  phases  of  bird  and  game  protection  were  read  and  discussed, 
and  new  legislation  was  proposed,  some  of  which  was  enacted  at  the 
following  session  of  the  legislature.  (A  detailed  account  of  this 
meeting  will  be  found  in  American  Field,  vol.  61,  p.  119.) 

One  of  the  most  recent  meetings  was  that  of  the  game  protectors 
of  New  York,  who  met  in  Albany  during  February,  1906,  and  formed 
a  permanent  organization.  Hereafter  they  will  meet  yearly  for  the 
purpose  of  discussing  matters  pertaining  to  their  duties. 


222  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

PERILS    OF    THE    WARDENS    POSITION. 

The  record  of  fatalities  incident  to  the  warden's  official  life  testifies 
to  the  perils  of  the  position.  Exposure  to  inclement  weather,  with 
attending  discomforts,  may  be  reasonably  accounted  part  of  the 
chances  a  warden  assumes  when  he  enters  upon  the  duties  of  the  office; 
but  conditions  should  not  be  such  as  to  compel  the  risk  of  surren- 
dering his  life  to  the  depravity  of  his  fellow-men.  Yet  such  is  the 
fact.  Several  deputies  and  other  officials  have  been  killed  within 
recent  years  while  in  the  discharge  of  their  duties.  In  not  a  few  cases 
the  culprits  have  received  merited  punishment  for  then  crimes  and 
have  been  sentenced  to  prison  for  longer  or  shorter  periods.  In 
other  instances  they  have  gone  unpunished,  as  in  the  case  of  a 
plume  hunter  who  killed  a  Florida  warden  while  he  was  attempting 
to  arrest  him  for  shooting  herons  in  a  colony  of  nesting  birds  and 
who  escaped  through  refusal  of  the  grand  jury  to  indict  him.  In  cases 
of  miscarriages  of  justice  like  this,  however,  it  should  be  remembered 
that  game  laws  and  game  wardens  are  of  comparatively  recent  origin 
in  the  United  States,  and  that  only  a  short  time  ago  the  popular 
idea  respecting  fish  and  game  was  that  wherever  found  they  were 
almost  as  much  the  property  of  the  individual  citizen  as  the  air  we 
breathe.  The  creation  of  a  healthy  public  sentiment  everywhere 
in  regard  to  the  protection  of  game  and  the  enforcement  of  game 
laws  is  only  a  matter  of  time,  and  the  wonder  is,  not  that  violations 
of  the  law,  followed  by  occasional  tragedies,  occur  in  remote  districts. 
but  that  respect  for  the  law  is  so  widespread,  cooperation  so  general, 
and  the  cause  of  bird  and  game  protection  so  far  advanced  in  public 
estimation  in  so  short  a  time. 

The  most  serious  problem  the  warden  of  to-day  has  to  contend 
with  in  some  sections  of  the  country  is  the  control  of  certain  classes 
of  immigrants  who  in  increasing  numbers  infest  the  woods  and  fields 
of  some  of  our  Northern  States  at  all  seasons  intent  upon  the  slaughter 
of  all  kinds  of  birds.  They  set  at  defiance  the  game  and  trespass 
laws,  and  to  warnings  not  to  hunt  upon  the  farmer's  land  they 
sometimes  respond  with  the  use  of  weapons,  occasionally  with  fatal 
results.  The  seriousness  of  the  situation  is  echoed  in  the  following 
paragraph  from  the  report  of  the  board  of  game  commissioners  of 
Pennsylvania  for  1904,  page  3: 

We  are  deeply  impressed  with  the  grave  condition  that  surrounds  the  enforcement 
of  our  game  laws  in  communities  where  the  foreign  element  *  *  *  is  in 
any  force,  and  recognize  in  this  question  the  most  serious  one  we  are  compelled  to 
meet.  This  class  seems  possessed  with  the  same  purpose  throughout  the  State,  and 
is  the  most  persistent  and  determined  in  not  only  violating  the  law.  Inn  in  resisting 
arrest  and  attempting  to  evade  punishment  after  they  have  been  arrested.  Hardly 
a  week  passes  without  an  assault  of  some  kind  upon  our  officers  from  these  people. 


THE  GAME  WARDEN  OF  TO-DAY.  223 

REVENUE  FOR  THE  WARDEN  SERVICE. 

The  long  delay  in  establishing  a  practical  and  efficient  scheme  for 
enforcing  game  laws  in  the  United  States  was  due  more  to  lack  of 
financial  means  than  any  other  one  cause.  Only  a  small  part  of  the 
people  in  each  locality  hunted,  and  the  suggestion  to  levy  a  special 
tax  or  to  appropriate  funds  from  the  general  treasury  for  the  support 
of  a  wardenship  excited  strong  opposition.  It  was  argued  that 
citizens  who,  from  lack  of  inclination  or  convenience,  do  not  hunt 
should  not  be  taxed  for  the  maintenance  of  the  sport.  So  strong  was 
this  sentiment  that  advocates  of  game  preservation  undertook  to 
find  a  way  by  which  the  laws  could  be  so  framed  as  to  provide  funds 
for  their  own  enforcement.  A  provision  was  inserted  in  the  game 
laws  providing  that  the  informer  should  be  entitled  to  a  moiety  of 
the  fine  or  that  the  game  warden  should  receive  the  whole  of  it. 
But  competent  men  were  not  readily  found  to  work  for  such  uncer- 
tain and  inadequate  compensation  and  the  game  laws  were  not 
enforced  in  many  localities.  Finally,  within  the  last  twelve  years  the 
hunting-license  system  as  a  means  of  raising  revenue  for  game  pro- 
tection has  proved  to  be  more  successful  and  more  equitable  than 
any  other,  since  those  who  hunt  and  are  directly  benefited  by  the 
enforcement  of  game  laws  contribute  the  funds  for  the  protection  of 
game.  Since  the  inauguration  of  this  method  nearly  every  State  has 
established  a  game  department,  and  several  of  them  support  their 
departments  wholly  from  hunting-license  fees. 

At  first  the  nonresident  was  the  only  one  required  to  take  out  a 
license  to  hunt,  and  this  is  now  the  usual  license  issued ;  but  it  was 
found  that  public  sentiment  in  several  States  favored  a  small  fee  for 
residents  and  in  16  States  this  additional  fee  is  now  required.  In 
Illinois  the  fund  derived  from  this  source  is  so  large  (the  receipts  in 
1905  amounting  to  $127,988)  that  after  payment  of  all  salaries  and 
other  expenses  of  administration  a  large  surplus  remains,  which  the 
legislature  has  authorized  the  State  game  commissioner  to  use  for  the 
purchase  and  propagation  of  quail,  prairie  chickens,  and  pheasants. 
The  commissioner  has  established  a  game  farm  near  Springfield  and 
has  stocked  it  with  several  species  of  game  birds,  foreign  and  native. 
This  project  has  met  with  marked  success  and  bids  fair  to  furnish  the 
State  with  game  to  stock  depleted  covers.  Thus  the  license  s}^stem, 
originally  adopted  merely  for  the  purpose  of  supporting  the  warden 
service,  has  very  materially  broadened  the  scope  of  the  State  game 
department. 

CONCLUSION. 

It  will  be  seen  from  the  foregoing  that  game  wardenship  in  this 
country  has  reached  its  present  state  of  efficiency  within  a  compara- 
tively short  time.     Beginning  with  the  very  local  moose  wardenship 


224  YEARBOOK    OF    THE   DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

iii  Maine  in  1852,  "the  service  has  been  gradually  extended  in  scope 
and  purpose  until  now  there  is  scarcely  a  locality  in  the  United  States 
where  a  game  warden  is  not  in  service — scarcely  a  wild  bird  or  animal 
which  does  not  come  under  his  protection. 

This  satisfactory  condition  lias  not  been  attained  without  a  strug- 
gle. Many  obstacles  have  been  placed  in  the  way  of  progress  by  an 
unwilling,  because  uninstructed,  public,  and  these  have  been  over- 
come onty  by  the  persistence  and  devotion  to  duty  of  those  who  have 
occupied  the  office  during  the  formative  period.  The  game  warden 
of  to-day  should  recognize  this  obligation  to  his  predecessors  and 
endeavor  not  only  to  maintain  but  to  surpass  the  high  standard  estab- 
lished by  them. 

Some  of  the  former  antagonism  against  game  laws  still  persists, 
and  in  certain  parts  of  the  country  the  wardenship  is  yet  in  an  experi- 
mental stage;  but  it  may  be  safely  predicted  that  in  the  near  future 
every  State  in  the  Union  will  have  established  its  game  department 
on  a  footing  with  its  other  executive  offices.  In  spite  of  its  growing 
importance  and  power,  however,  the  office  of  game  warden  is  a  diffi- 
cult one  to  fill,  and  it  is  the  duty  of  every  good  citizen  to  lend  this 
important  public  servant  every  assistance  and  encouragement  in  the 
discharge  of  his  duties. 


RANGE  MANAGEMENT. 

By  J.  S.  Cotton, 

Assistant  in  Range  Investigations,  Farm  Management  Investigations, 

Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

THE    PRESENT    SITUATION. 

At  the  present  time  the  greater  part  of  western  grazing  lands  is 
badly  overstocked.  Some  of  the  ranges  are  so  crowded  that  the 
stockmen  are  experiencing  difficulty  in  getting  sufficient  grazing  for 
their  herds.  Many  herds  have  been  cut  down  in  order  to  meet  these 
conditions,  while  in  some  instances,  rather  than  run  the  risk  of  an 
unusually  hard  winter  or  a  period  of  drought,  stockmen  are  going  out 
of  business  entirely. 

When  the  first  stockmen  drove  their  herds  on  the  western  range 
lands  there  was  a  great  abundance  of  feed,  and  it  was  generally 
believed  that  this  feed  would  never  be  fully  utilized.  As  a  conse- 
quence these  men  increased  their  herds  as  much  as  possible,  so  as  to 
use  all  of  the  feed  they  could.  Others,  seeing  the  prosperous  condi- 
tion of  these  men,  began  to  bring  in  large  herds,  that  they  also  might 
get  their  share  of  the  free  grass.  Thus  it  was  only  a  few  years  until  the 
range  was  carrying  more  stock  than  it  could  properly  support. 

During  the  past  few  years  there  has  been  a  heavy  immigration  of 
settlers  to  several  parts  of  these  grazing  lands.  These  settlers  have 
taken  up  large  bodies  of  the  very  best  grazing  lands  for  farming  pur- 
poses. The  men  ranging  their  stock  in  these  areas  were  for  the.  most 
part  crowded  back  to  the  ranges  of  other  stockmen,  thus  greatly 
aggravating  the  already  crowded  condition  of  the  range.  As  a  neces- 
sary result  of  all  this  overcrowding  the  range  began  to  deteriorate. 

The  rate  of  this  deterioration  has  been  governed  somewhat  by 
accessibility,  a  range  that  is  easily  accessible  being  much  more 
likely  to  be  overstocked  than  one  that  is  difficult  to  reach.  It  has, 
however,  been  governed  much  more  largely  by  climatic  conditions. 
In  the  northern  range  States,  where  the  severe  winters  and  the  lia- 
bility of  a  heav}*  fall  of  snow  acted  as  a  cheek,  and  where  the  rainfall 
is  sufficient  for  the  growth  of  a  good  crop  of  grass,  the  deterioration 
of  the  range  has  been  rather  slow  until  the  past  few  years.  In  the 
South,  where  the  stock  can  be  grazed  the  year  round  with  perfect 
safety,  the  range  has  been  stocked  to  the  highest  number  it  would 
3    A1906 15  225 


226  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

earn*  during  favorable  seasons.  When  a  period  of  drought  has 
occurred,  with  a  consequent  shortage  of  grasses  and  other  forage 
plants,  the  same  number  of  animals  has  been  still  on  hand  to  be  sup- 
ported. This  has  resulted  in  severe  grazing  of  the  native  grasses  and 
other  forage  plants,  preventing  the  vegetation  from  yielding  seed 
with  which  to  reproduce  itself,  thus  greatly  lowering  the  carrying 
capacity  of  the  range.  This  carrying  capacity  is,  of  necessity,  gov- 
erned largely  by  the  amount  of  rainfall.  In  years  when  there  are 
ample  rains  there  is  an  abundance  of  vegetation  for  grazing,  but  in 
the  periods  when  the  rainfall  is  light  the  growth  of  vegetation  is  much 
less.  Much  damage  has  been  done  to  the  ranges  through  the  inability 
of  the  stockmen  to  reduce  their  herds  during  periods  of  drought. 

With  the  exception  of  the  western  portions  of  Oklahoma.  Ka:  - 
and  Nebraska,  the  carrying  capacity  of  the  range  is  much  lower  at 
the  present  time  than  it  was  in  the  early  days,  or  even  a  decade  ago. 
Reports  from  various  stockmen  indicate  that  the  majority  of  the 
ranges  are  not  carrying  one-half  as  many  animals  as  formerly. 
Ranges  which  formerly  required  from  S  to  12  acres  to  support  a  single 
steer  throughout  the  entire  year  now  usually  require  from  20  to  35 
acres.  Instances  are  cited  in  Arizona  where  from  50  to  100  acres  are 
needed  to  support  a  single  beef  animal.0  In  western  Nebraska  the 
carrying  capacity  of  the  range  is  considerably  higher  than  formerly. 
This  is  because  the  stockmen  of  that  region  have  protected  their 
ranges  from  the  ravages  of  prairie  fires. 

Overcrowding  the  public  ranges  has  caused  considerable  friction. 
In  many  sections  there  have  been  bitter  fights  between  the  sheepmen 
and  the  cattlemen.  The  majority  of  these  fights  were  eventually 
settled  by  a  division  of  the  range  and  the  establishing  of  dead  lines. 
There  have  also  been  serious  difficulties  between  the  stockmen  and 
the  homesteaders.  In  some  instances  the  stockmen  tried  to  keep  the 
settlers  out ;  in  other  places  the  settlers  have  taken  up  the  watering 
places  or  settled  on  land  adjoining  them,  and  have  kept  the  stock 
from  watering  in  their  accustomed  places  either  by  building  fences 
or  by  driving  them  away. 

The  stockmen  have  tried  in  many  ways  to  adjust  themselves  to 
these  conditions.  Some  have  obtained  virtual  control  of  their  ranges 
by  buying  up  or  leasing  all  the  watering  places.  Others  have  been 
able  to  buy  railroad  land  and  deserted  homesteads  or  to  lease  school 
lands,  and  thus  bring  their  ranges  under  direct  control. 

In  other  regions,  where  the  land  could  not  be  brought  under  control 
by  these  methods,  stockmen  hare  divided  the  ranges  by  mutual  con- 
sent. Later  they  began  to  build  drift  fences  on  these  lines  in  order  to 
prevent  their  cattle  from  straying  from  their  ranges.  These  drift 
fences  were  gradually  extended  until  large  tracts  of  Government  land 

a  Bui.  G7,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry.  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr..  pp.  33  and  34. 


RANGE    MANAGEMENT.  227 

were  inclosed.  The  fencing  in  of  large  pastures  proved  to  be  so  con- 
venient to  the  stockmen  in  the  handling  of  their  stock  that  it  became 
quite  general  in  several  of  the  range  States. 

ATTITUDE    OF    STOCKMEN    TOWARD    LEGISLATION. 

Recently  an  Executive  order  was  issued  requiring  that  these  fences 
be  removed.  The  results  of  this  order  have  greatly  emphasized  the 
necessity  for  some  legislation  which  will  effect  a  distribution  of  range 
land  among  those  having  stock  on  the  ranges,  so  as  to  secure  to  them 
by  lease,  purchase,  or  other  legal  means  the  possibility  of  managing 
their  ranges  with  a  view  to  maintaining  their  productiveness.  The 
stockmen,  who  in  the  absence  of  legislation  had  gradually  developed 
a  system  of  range  division  among  themselves,  all  recognize  that  this 
division  was  a  primitive  arrangement,  devoid  of  legal  status,  but 
made  necessary  by  the  exigencies  of  the  business.  For  the  most  part 
they  are  heartily  in  favor  of  legislation  which  will  give  stockmen  a 
legal  right  to  protect  whatever  range  may  be  assigned  to  each. 

A  few  years  ago  the  stockmen  were  bitterly  opposed  to  any  form  of 
legislation  for  the  division  of  the  public  domain  through  leasing  or  any 
other  system.  They  felt  that  if  they  were  deprived  of  free  feed  they 
would  be  unable  to  make  a  living  from  the  range,  for  they  could  not 
afford  to  lease  or  purchase  the  feed.  All  they  wanted  was  that  the 
range  should  be  "  let  alone." 

Now,  with  the  greatly  changed  conditions  caused  by  overstocking 
and  the  taking  up  of  large  areas  of  the  best  range  lands  for  farming 
purposes,  the  more  progressive  stockmen  realize  fully  that  unless 
some  such  step  is  taken  the  open  range  will  soon  be  destroyed. 

Although  the  majority  of  the  stockmen  now  favor  some  form  of 
legislation  for  the  future  disposal  of  that  part  of  the  public  domain 
which  is  suitable  for  range  purposes  only,  there  is  still  a  great  diversity 
of  opinion  concerning  the  character  of  the  laws  needed.  The  greater 
number  seem  to  be  in  favor  of  some  system  of  leasing  the  land  in  indi- 
vidual pastures  for  terms  of  five  to  ten  years.  Nearly  all  believe  that 
the  area  of  land  leased  to  a  given  person  should  be  some  multiple  of  the 
area  to  which  he  holds  title  in  the  vicinity,  but  that  there  should  be  a 
maximum  limit  in  order  to  prevent  any  one  man  or  company  from 
securing  control  of  too  much  land. 

BANGS    IMPROVEMENT. 

So  long  as  it  remains  public  domain,  and  is  consequently  free  to  all 
without  restriction,  nothing  can  be  done  to  improve  the  range  land 
of  the  country,  for  whatever  improvement  might  be  effected  would 
almost  immediately  be  destroyed  by  the  stockmen  in  their  eagerness 
to  be  the  first  to  profit  by  it.     But  when  the  land  is  brought  under 


228  YEAEBOOK    Of    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGEICULTUEE. 

control  by  lease,  purchase,  or  other  means  the  problem  of  handling 
the  range  is  radically  changed  and  the  stockman  is  on  an  entirely 
different  footing.  Instead  of  living  in  uncertainty  as  to  when  his 
ran^e  will  be  a  thing  of  the  past,  he  will  know  just  how  much  land  he 
can  use  and  depend  upon.  Then  he  will  not  feel  that  he  must  graze  this 
land  as  hard  as  lie  can  while  he  has  the  opportunity.  Instead,  he  will 
be  in  position  to  protect  it  and  get  the  greatest  amount  of  good  from 
it  from  year  to  year.  He  will  then  be  able  to  fence  the  land  and  keep 
off  all  outside  stock,  and  to  regulate  the  number  of  his  own  grazing 
ther- 

Many  stockmen  are  firmly  convinced  that  stock  can  not  be  run  at  a 
profit  in  pastures  that  are  owned  or  leased.  Numerous  citations  of 
large  cattle  companies  that  have  lost  heavily  in  leasing  grazing  lands 
on  Indian  reservations  are  made.  It  is  true  that  many  of  the  cattle 
.tanies  have  lost  large  sums  of  money  in  leasing  these  lands. 
Careful  investigation,  however,  will  usually  show  some  special  reasons 
for  such  I     -  First,  the  majority  of  these  companies  were  handling 

a  very  poor  grade  of  cattle.  These  yielded  so  small  a  margin  between 
the  cost  of  putting  them  into  the  pasture  and  the  returns  from  put- 
ting them  on  the  market  that  they  could  not  stand  the  extra  expense 
incurred  in  leasing.  Then  the  cattle  seemed  to  be  unadapted  to  such 
irage  conditions.  Instead  of  grazing  contentedly  in  the  pastures 
they  spent  the  greater  part  of  their  time  wandering  along  the  fences. 
Another  reason  for  this  failure,  and  a  very  important  one,  is  that  the 
number  of  acres  allotted  to  an  animal  was  usually  placed  too  low.  and 
overgrazing  resulted. 

stock  companies  did  not  adapt  themselves  to 
the  changed  conditions.  While  a  few  men  or  companies  have  not 
mad  >f  running  stock  in  inclosed  areas,  a  very  large  number 

have  succeeded.  At  the  present  time  the  most  successful  stockmen 
of  such  States  as  Texas.  California,  and  Washington,  where  the  free 
range  is  almost  a  tiling  of  the  past,  run  their  stock  in  pastures. 

[DANCE    05    OVERGRAZING. 

In  making  the  change  from  the  open  range  to  the  inclosed  pastures 
stockmen  must  not  lose  sight  of  the  fact  that  when  they  have  thus 
shut  out  all  stray  stock  they  have  not  changed  the  carrying  capacity 
of  the  land  in  the  least.  They  must  therefore  be  careful  not  to  over- 
graze the  inclosed  areas,  which  is  often  done  from  a  mistaken  idea 
that  the  mere  fencing  of  a  range  increases  its  carrying  capacity.  The 
majority  of  stockmen  using  the  public  domain  place  a  very  conserva- 
tive estimate  on  its  carrying  capacity.  Yet  when  they  come  to 
inclose  an  area  and  pasture  it.  they  are  quite  inclined  to  put  in  more 
stock  than  their  estimate  calls  for:  consequently  their  pastures  are 
badly  overstocked,  and  in  some  instances  are  actually  grazed  closer 


RANGE    MANAGEMENT.  229 

than  the  outside  range.  This  means  not  only  that  the  pasture  has 
been  seriously  damaged,  but  that  the  stock  are  in  poorer  condition  at 
the  end  of  the  season  than  if  they  had  run  outside.  It  is  safe  to  say 
that  nine  out  of  ten  men  changing  from  the  outside  range  to  pastures 
will  overgraze  their  land  the  first  season.  Many  of  these  will  change 
their  methods  immediately  and  soon  get  their  pastures  on  a  support- 
ing basis;  others  will  take  two  or  three  years  to  really  learn  the  true 
carrying  capacity  of  their  pastures;  and  still  others,  who  can  not  get 
out  of  the  rut,  will  continue  to  overgraze,  with  the  result  that  their 
pastures  will  continually  run  down,  while  their  stock  grows  poorer  in 
quality  from  year  to  jTear. 

RESTING    THE   LAND. 

Where  an  area  of  land  has  been  very  severely  overgrazed  in  the  past 
it  will  be  absolutely  necessary  that  it  be  very  carefully  pastured  for  the 
first  two  or  three  years.  The  native  grasses  and  forage  plants  must 
have  a  chance  to  regain  their  former  vigor  and  to  go  to  seed.  A  very 
large  number  of  stockmen  advocate  resting  the  land — that  is,  keeping 
all  stock  off  for  a  period  of  three  or  four  years.  That  this  remedy  will 
bring  about  the  desired  results  has  been  definitely  proved  in  numerous 
instances.  In  Arizona  the  Department  of  Agriculture  has  a  large 
area  of  land  in  the  Santa  Rita  Forest  Reserve  that  is  entirely  protected 
from  stock.  This  area  contains  about  50  square  miles,  and  includes 
range  country  that  varies  from  very  poor  mesa  to  fairly  good  moun- 
tain range.  Before  it  was  fenced  this  area  was  in  a  very  badly 
denuded  condition.  In  less  than  two  years,  under  protection,  it  has 
improved  wonderfully.  A  large  percentage  of  the  new  vegetation  is 
of  little  value,  however,  as  many  of  the  seeds  present  were  of  plants 
not  relished  by  stock.  But  the  better  kinds  of  grasses  scattered 
among  this  vegetation  are  increasing. 

In  the  State  of  Washington  experiments  and  observation  of  inclosed 
areas  covering  a  period  of  five  years  have  shown  conclusively  that  a 
given  range  can  be  very  greatly  improved  and  in  some  cases  brought 
back  to  its  original  carrying  capacity  in  from  two  to  five  years  if  it 
is  properly  protected.  The  length  of  time  required  for  the  range  to 
be  fully  restored  depends  partly  on  how  complete  the  overgrazing  has 
been  and  largely  on  the  amount  of  rainfall. 

While  resting  will  bring  about  the  desired  results,  there  are  very  few 
men  who  can  afford  to  allow  their  land  to  remain  idle  for  so  long  a 
period,  as  the  taxes,  interest  on  the  investment,  and  cost  of  mainte- 
nance go  on  just  the  same  whether  the  land  is  in  use  or  not.  Resting 
would  in  the  end  be  cheaper  than  to  continue  overgrazing  the  land, 
but  it  is  really  not  necessary.  There  is  no  reason  why,  by  judicious 
management,  the  feed  on  such  an  area  should  not  be  utilized.  If  such 
a  pasture  be  grazed  very  lightly  during  the  early  part  of  the  season 


230  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

until  the  grasses  can  get  their  growth  and  go  to  seed,  it  will  then  have 
a  chance  to  improve,  although  this  improvement  may  be  slight.  It 
would  be  much  better  if  the  pasture  could  be  protected  until  the 
grasses  have  gone  to  seed  and  the  seed  has  fallen  to  the  ground.  Then 
the  dry  feed  can  be  utilized  without  damage  to  the  range. 

ALTERNATION    OF    PASTURES. 

This  improvement  can  best  be  accomplished  by  dividing  the  pas- 
ture into  a  number  of  smaller  ones  and  alternating  the  stock  from  one 
to  another.  The  number  of  pastures  will  depend  somewhat  on  the 
size  of  the  range  and  how  it  is  watered.  In  order  to  secure  the  best 
results  there  should  be  not  less  than  three  pastures,  while  four,  or  even 
more,  would  be  much  better.  In  all  parts  of  the  country  the  more 
successful  stockmen  have  a  fenced  area  that  they  reserve  for  winter 
pasture,  while  those  who  run  their  stock  entirely  on  their  own  land 
nearly  always  subdivide  to  the  extent  of  a  summer  and  a  winter  pas- 
ture. It  is  noticeable  that  in  nearly  every  instance  the  winter  pasture 
shows  an  excellent  stand  and  produces  much  more  feed  than  the  sum- 
mer pasture.  This  is  solely  because  the  grasses,  being  grazed  only  in 
the  winter,  have  a  chance  to  remain  in  healthy  condition  and  also  to 
produce  a  crop  of  seed  with  which  to  supply  new  plants  as  the  old  ones 
give  way.  Again,  there  being  a  good  covering  of  vegetation,  the 
ground  is  protected  so  that  the  wind  and  hot  sun  do  not  take  all  the 
moisture  out  of  the  ground.  Instead,  the  moisture  is  utilized  in  grow- 
ing vegetation  for  feed. 

In  Texas  many  of  the  stockmen  have  found  that  it  pays  them  to 
alternate  their  pastures.  Some  even  assert  that'  with  their  pastures 
in  the  best  of  condition  they  carry  more  stock  on  a  given  area  where 
alternation  of  pasture  is  practiced  than  where  one  big  field  is  used.a 
Even  in  the  East,  where  there  is  plenty  of  moisture,  alternation  of 
pastures  is  being  more  strongly  advocated  each  year,  as  the  farmers, 
are  gradually  learning  that  their  pastures  can  be  made  to  carry  more 
stock  by  this  method. 

RESEEDING    THE    WORN-OUT   RANGE. 

The  problem  of  reseeding  the  range  has  received  much  attention 
from  the  Department  of  Agriculture.  So  far,  experiments  have  shown 
that  in  the  extremely  arid  portions  of  the  range  country  reseeding  is 
impracticable.  The  only  method  of  restoring  such  areas  is  to  rest  the 
overgrazed  portions.  In  case  such  ranges  are  grazed  the  year  round, 
alternation  of  pastures  is  the  only  solution  that  can  be  offered  at  the 
present  time.  Fortunately,  on  account  of  the  scarcity  of  water,  the 
great  majority  of  these  areas  are  used  only  for  winter  pastures.     In 

a  Bui.  10,  Division  of  Agrostology.  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr..  p.  22.  1899. 


EANGE    MANAGEMENT.  231 

this  way  these  areas  have  a  chance  to  make  a  good  growth  and  to  go 
to  seed  during  the  summer  season.  Thus  they  have  ample  oppor- 
tunity to  restore  themselves  in  case  they  are  not  overgrazed. 

In  the  semiarid  regions,  such  as  the  bunch-grass  hills  of  Washing- 
ton, Oregon,  and  Idaho,  and  the  grama-grass  regions  of  Montana,  the 
Dakotas,  and  Wyoming,  alternation  of  pastures  will  be  equally  useful. 

Ordinarily,  unless  the  overgrazing  has  been  very  severe,  the  restora- 
tion process  will  not  take  many  years,  in  some  instances  only  four  or 
five.  If,  however,  the  overgrazing  has  been  complete  enough  to 
practically  destroy  all  the  native  plants  and  has  been  so  long  in  dura- 
tion that  no  seed  is  left  in  the  ground,  the  process  will  be  very  slow 
mdeed,  for  there  is  nothing  left  on  which  to  base  improvement. 
Under  such  conditions  weeds  of  almost  no  forage  value  are  very  likely 
to  take  the  place  of  the  valuable  forage  plants  that  have  been  de- 
stroyed. In  order  to  prevent  this,  it  might  be  feasible  in  some  locali- 
ties to  gather  seed  of  these  native  grasses  and  scatter  it  on  the  over- 
grazed portions.  In  the  State  of  Washington,  farmers  have  taken  seed 
of  the  tall  lime-grass  (Ely  m  us  condensatus) ,  called  rye-grass  by  stock- 
men, and  sown  it  on  areas  where  it  formerly  grew.  Instances  are  known 
where  these  men  are  now  cutting  lime-grass  hay  from  these  same  areas. 
Experiments  carried  on  b}T  the  Washington  Agricultural  College  in 
cooperation  with  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  have  shown  that  this 
could  probably  be  done  in  favorable  seasons  with  bunch-grass.  In  the 
Dakotas  and  eastern  Montana  it  is  quite  noticeable  that  wherever  a 
part  of  the  prairie  land  is  plowed  up  and  then  allowed  to  revert  it  will 
in  time  be  covered  with  wheat-grass  (Agropyron  occidentale) .  If  it  is 
plowed  and  nothing  else  is  done  the  wheat-grass  will  take  possession 
of  the  area  very  quickly.  This  and  the  rapidity  with  which  this  grass 
works  into  overgrazed  places  that  are  rested  a  little  show  very  plainly 
that  the  overgrazed  areas  where  it  grows  naturally  can  be  easily  re- 
stored by  reseeding  with  this  grass.  Whether  the  grama  grasses  of 
these  regions  could  be  restored  by  this  process  is  not  known.  Many 
of  the  leading  stockmen  are  inclined  to  believe  that  they  could,  but 
think  it  would  be  a  difficult  matter  to  procure  the  seed. 

RESEEDING    IX    THE    MOUNTAIN    AREAS. 

In  the  mountain  areas,  where  the  rainfall  is  much  greater,  the 
problem  of  restoring  the  range  is  not  nearly  so  difficult.  Where  the 
devastation  has  not  been  too  complete  the  range  will  soon  restore 
itself  if  protected.  On  those  areas  where  overgrazing  has  left  the 
range  in  a  denuded  condition  the  restoration  will  take  a  number  of 
years.  It  can,  however,  usually  be  greatly  hastened  b}~  reseeding 
with  some  of  the  cultivated  grasses.  Experiments  carried  on  during 
the  past  four  years  in  the  mountain  areas  of  Washington  have  thor- 
oughly demonstrated  that  timothy  can  be  used  to  excellent  advantage 


232  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

in  the  mountain  meadows  and  in  the  parks  of  that  State  where  the 
original  vegetation  has  been  destroyed  by  sheep.  This  grass  proved 
to  be  the  best  of  a  number  used  in  reseeding  the  devastated  mountain 
meadows  (1)  because  it  made  the  best  growth  and  stood  pasturage 
well,  and  (2)  because  it  was  the  cheapest  and  easiest  to  start. 

According  to  these  experiments,  the  cost  of  reseeding  land  is  from 
60  cents  to  $1  an  acre,  depending  on  the  amount  of  seed  used  and  on 
the  cost  of  getting  it  into  the  mountains.  Eight  pounds  of  seed 
per  acre  ought  to  give  a  stand  that  if  cut  for  hay  would  yield  approx- 
imately  three-fourths  of  a  ton  of  hay  per  acre.  That  would  mean 
that  it  would  yield  nearly  enough  forage  the  second  season  after  it 
was  sown  to  pay  for  the  reseeding.  If  the  seed  were  sown  in  the 
autumn  before  snow  falls  it  would  need  no  further  treatment,  but 
if  sown  in  the  spring  it  should  be  harrowed  in,  which  would  greatly 
increase  the  cost. 

These  experiments  have  also  proved  that  orchard  grass  and  tall 
fescue  would  do  well  on  those  areas  that  arc  a  little  too  dry  for 
the  successful  growth  of  timothy,  and  that  Bromus  inermis  will 
be  of  very  great  value  in  range  improvement  along  the  drier  edges 
of  the  meadows  and  parks,  provided  the  seed  can  be  secured  at  a 
price  that  does  not  make  it  prohibitive.  Redtop  has  given  good 
results,  but  it  has  been  very  slow  in  establishing  itself.  It  made 
almost  no  showing  until  the  third  }Tear,  but  by  the  fourth  season  it 
had  attained  an  excellent  stand  and  was  beginning  to  crowd  out  the 
native  vegetation  growing  in  the  meadow  with  it.  It  will  furnish  a 
large  amount  of  excellent  feed  in  the  mountain  meadows. 

In  the  Sierra  Nevadas  of  California  redtop  and  timothy  have 
shown  themselves  to  be  of  great  value  in  reseeding  along  the  edges 
of  the  worn-out  and  badly  overgrazed  meadows,  provided  they  are 
not  sown  on  those  areas  where  there  is  standing  water  throughout 
the  greater  part  of  the  year.  Redtop  seems  to  do  especially  well  in 
the  mountain  areas.  Judging  from  the  results  of  experiments,  when 
once  introduced  it  will  spread  over  a  great  part  of  the  meadow  and 
will  form  a  dense  sod  that  will  in  time  crowd  out  other  vegetation. 

Orchard  grass  also  grows  very  well  in  meadows,  and  also  will  appar- 
ently do  well  on  some  of  the  drier  hillsides  where  there  is  not  enough 
moisture  for  timothy  or  redtop.  In  fact,  one  of  the  rangers  of  the 
Sierra  Forest  Reserve  has  succeeded  in  growing  a  fair  crop  of  orchard- 
grass  hay  for  his  saddle  horses  just  on  the  lower  edge  of  the  timber 
belt,  where  the  land  has  been  cleared  of  chaparral  and  the  conditions 
are  quite  arid. 

CONSERVATION    OF   WATER. 

The  water  problem  is  of  extreme  importance  in  range  improve- 
ment, for  without  plenty  of  good  water  stock  can  not  be  expected  to 
make  good  gains.     When  the  land  is  once  brought  under  control  the 


RANGE    MANAGEMENT.  233 

stockmen  can  afford  to  go  to  considerable  expense  to  secure  plenty  of 
water.  In  many  instances,  as  in  parts  of  Montana,  Wyoming,  and 
the  Dakotas,  large  reservoirs,  or  "water  holes,"  can  be  made,  which, 
with  the  local  showers  during  summer,  will  insure  plenty  of  water 
throughout  the  year.  In  other  sections,  as  in  the  sandhills  of 
Nebraska  or  in  southern  California,  the  water  can  be  easily  obtained 
by  means  of  wells  and  storage  tanks,  the  water  being  pumped  by 
windmills  or  gasoline  engines.  In  many  sections  of  the  countiy,  as 
in  Washington,  Oregon,  and  Nevada,  there  are  numerous  springs 
which  formerly  watered  a  large  number  of  cattle,  but  which  have 
gone  dry  through  the  incessant  tramping  of  stock  about  them.  If 
these  springs  were  dug  out  and  fenced  and  the  water  conducted  to 
troughs  they  could  again  be  made  to  furnish  an  abundance  of  water 
for  a  considerable  number  of  stock.  The  water  thus  stored  in  troughs 
will  be  kept  clean  for  the  stock  and  none  of  it  need  be  wasted 
through  seepage.  In  Nevada  the  digging  out  and  protection  of  the 
springs  is  considered  to  be  of  the  greatest  importance." 

Every  opportunity  should  be  taken  to  increase  the  number  of 
watering  places,  so  that  the  stock  using  them  would  need  to  travel 
011I3*  comparatively  short  distances.  In  this  way  the  range  can  be 
improved  greatly,  as  the  stock  will  not  need  to  tramp  over  so  much 
ground  in  traveling  from  the  grass  to  the  water  and  back.  It  will 
also  be  beneficial  to  the  stock  themselves,  as  the  time  spent  now  in 
traveling  for  water  can  be  spent  in  resting  or  in  feeding,  and  thus  in 
making  larger  gains. 

rREMATURE     CRAZING    TO     BE    AVOIDED. 

One  of  the  great  dangers  in  handling  range  stock  is  the  tendency 
of  many  of  the  stockmen  to  put  their  stock  out  on  the  range  just 
as  soon  as  the  grass  begins  to  start  in  the  spring  and  before  the  ground 
is  thoroughly  settled.  The  vegetation,  being  nipped  off  before  it 
gets  a  fair  start,  or,  as  the  stockmen  say,  "gets  strong,"  is  greatly 
retarded  in  its  growth  and  does  not  produce  as  much  feed  that  season 
as  it  would  if  it  had  a  better  chance.  Where  the  soil  is  clayey  the 
damage  caused  by  the  premature  grazing  is  greatly  increased  by  the 
tramping  of  the  stock,  which  tends  to  pack  it  into  a  hard  layer  that 
is  impenetrable  to  plant  roots.  This  packing  of  the  soil  has  been  one 
of  the  greatest  factors  in  the  destruction  of  the  feed  in  many  mountain 
meadows. 

RAISING    WINTER    FEED. 

In  order  to  obtain  the  greatest  returns  from  his  land,  the  stockman 
of  the  future  will  need  to  grow  enough  feed  to  carry  his  stock  through 
the  winter  without  danger  of  loss  and  to  keep  them  in  good  growing 

a  Bui.  55,  Nevada  Agr.  Exp.  Sta. ,  pp.  14  and  26. 


234  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

condition.  With  the  extra  cost  of  running  his  stock  in  pastures  he 
must  keep  them  constantly  gaining,  or  they  will  prove  a  loss.  If  he 
can  not  get  water  for  irrigation  either  from  some  stream  or  through 
storage  reservoirs,  such  as  are  common  in  the  Dakotas,  that  will 
catch  enough  surface  water  to  insure  sufficient  pasture,  he  will  need 
to  grow  grain  hay. 

Of  the  different  cereals  that  can  be  used  for  hsij,  rye  will  prob- 
ably prove  to  be  the  surest  to  }Tield  a  good  crop  over  the  greatest 
area  of  country.  It  will  stand  the  hard  winters  of  the  North  as  well 
as  any  of  the  other  cereals  and  requires  the  least  moisture  of  any  of 
them  to  mature  a  crop  of  ha}".  It  can  also  be  made  to  yield  a  fair 
crop  with  as  little  effort  as  any  of  the  other  cereals,  and  can  thus  be 
grown  at  the  least  cost.  Many  of  the  stockmen  are  greatly  prejudiced 
against  this  plant  as  forage.  This  is  probably  very  largely  due  to 
the  fact  that  they  have  allowed  it  to  get  too  ripe  before  cutting.  If 
cut  when  just  in  the  milk  it  makes  excellent  hay  with  which  to 
winter  stock.  Beardless  barley  is  another  excellent  crop  to  grow 
for  grain  hay.  It  produces  a  better  quality  of  feed  than  rye  and 
in  some  localities  is  preferred  to  any  of  the  cultivated  grasses  for 
feed.  It  probably  could  not  be  depended  on  to  produce  as  large  a 
yield  as  rye,  nor  is  it  so  certain  a  crop.  In  some  sections  of  the  coun- 
try, as  in  the  Dakotas,  durum  wheat  will  produce  a  considerable 
amount  of  forage  in  the  more  favorable  years.  In  other  sections 
many  of  the  farmers  seem  to  be  well  pleased  with  spelt.  These  last 
two  plants  are  not  so  desirable  for  stock  as  some  others  on  account  of 
their  heavy  beards.  These  beards  will  often  cause  sore  mouths, 
especially  when  fed  to  horses,  and  will  also  cause  losses  among 
sheep.  In  the  more  favorable  localities  wheat,  barley,  and  oats 
can  be  grown. 

In  the  Dakotas  and  eastern  Montana  a  number  of  stockmen  raise 
corn  for  forage  and  find  this  to  be  exceedingly  profitable.  These  men 
are  thoroughly  convinced  that  by  feeding  corn  fodder  to  their  calves 
and  yearlings  they  get  enough  better  gains  to  pay  them  well  for  their 
extra  work.  It  is  noticeable  that  the  men  who  are  doing  this  are 
topping  the  markets  with  grass-fed  cattle  from  their  sections.  This 
they  ascribe  largely  to  the  fact  that  they  get  better  gains  on  their 
young  stock.  In  most  instances  these  men  are  really  raising  a  better 
grade  of  cattle  than  their  neighbors,  which  must  also  be  taken  into 
consideration. 

Where  a  little  water  can  be  stored  for  irrigation,  brome-grass 
(Bromus  inermis)  produces  a  fair  crop  of  hay  and  is  becoming  quite 
popular.  This  is  especially  true  of  the  western  half  of  the  Dakotas. 
It  is  quite  probable  that  with  the  same  amount  of  water  alfalfa 
would  give  a  larger  yield.  Alfalfa  will  grow  on  much  drier  land  than 
is  often  supposed.     In  many  parts  of  the  West  the  stockmen  have 


RANGE    MANAGEMENT.  235 

been  trying  to  start  this  plant.  Some  succeed,  while  others  fail.  A 
large  number  get  very  poor  results,  as  their  alfalfa  seems  to  'winter- 
kill" badly.  Experiments  that  are  being  carried  on  at  the  substation 
at  Dickinson.  X.  Dak.,  appear  to  indicate  that  much  of  the  winter- 
killing is  due  to  a  lack  of  nitrogen-gathering  bacteria,  which  are 
essential  for  the  successful  growth  of  alfalfa."  Alfalfa  is  really  worth 
a  considerable  effort  in  order  to  get  it  started.  In  case  of  failure  it 
should  be  tried  again  on  a  small  scale  until  it  has  been  determined 
whether  it  can  be  made  to  succeed. 

AREA    OF    LAND    NEEDED. 

The  area  of  land  required  to  justify-  engaging  in  the  stock  business, 
without  other  source  of  revenue,  varies  greatly  in  different  sections. 
In  the  northern  range  States,  where  stock  must  be  fed  for  a  period  of 
three  or  four  months  during  the  winter  season,  and  where  the  rain- 
fall is  fairly  abundant.  2.500  to  4.000  acres  of  land  would  ordinarily 
be  needed  to  make  a  fair  living  for  a  family.  If  the  settler  were  for- 
tunate in  selecting  a  range  that  had  not  been  very  much  overgrazed 
and  on  which  there  was  very  little  waste  land,  he  might  be  able  to 
get  along  with  only  2,000  acres.  Such  areas  will,  however,  be  diffi- 
cult to  find.  In  the  more  southern  range  States,  where  the  rainfall 
is  much  less  and  not  so  well  distributed  throughout  the  season,  the 
number  of  acres  required  for  an  animal  will  be  much  greater.  Here 
the  area  required  to  support  a  family  will  vary  from  10.000  acres  in 
the  better  sections  to  25,000,  and  in  some  cases  as  much  as  40,000  acres 
are  required. 

IMPROVING    THE    GRADE    OF    STOCK. 

Improvement  of  the  class  of  stock  using  the  grazing  lands  is  becom- 
ing constantly  more  important.  In  the  old  days,  when  there  was 
plentv  of  free  range,  almost  any  kind  of  animal  could  be  sold  at  a 
profit.  Under  the  present  crowded  conditions  the  cost  of  mainte- 
nance is  much  higher,  and  the  poor-grade  animal,  or  "scrub,"  will  no 
longer  yield  satisfactory  returns. 

The  man  who  is  running  his  stock  in  inclosed  areas  or  contemplates 
so  doino-  in  the  future  will  find  it  necessarv.  if  he  is  to  be  successful, 
to  carry  that  class  of  stock  that  will  net  him  the  greatest  returns. 
This  statement  holds  equally  true  for  the  outside  range.  In  fact, 
there  are  only  two  methods  whereby  the  man  who  expects  to  con- 
tinue running  his  stock  on  the  public  domain  can  meet  the  existing 
conditions  successfully.  One  is  the  raising  of  sufficient  feed  to  carry 
his  stock  through  the  winter  safely:  the  other,  to  run  a  grade  of  stock 
that  shall  make  the  largest  possible  returns  in  the  shortest  time. 

a  For  information  <n\  nitrogen-gathering  bacteria  sec  Bulletin  No.  71  of  the  Bureau 
of  Plant  Industry. 


236  YEAKBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

A  cattleman  can  no  longer  afford  to  run  steers  until  they  are  4,  5, 
or  6  years  old.  but  he  will  need  to  raise  quick-maturing  animals  that 
"will  be  ready  for  market  by  the  time  they  are  2  or  3  years  old — -4  at 
the  very  latest.  Not  only  must  these  cattle  mature  early,  but  they 
must  be  of  a  quality  that  will  dress  a  good  percentage  of  beef. 

This  means  that  the  "cattleman  will  need  to  raise  high-grade  cows 
a:ii  supply  the  very  best  bulls  he  can  secure — if  pure  bred,  so  much 
the  better.     In  many  instances  the  cattlemen  are  so  crowded  for 
_  :*  that  they  find  it  difficult  to  produce  beef  because  the  grass  is 
icient  for  the  steers  to  make  rapid  gains.     Men  in  other  sections 
find  "  -  of  too  poor  a  quality  to  fatten  steers.     These  men  will 

need  to  grow  cattle  for  the  eastern  feed  yards,  to  be  sold  to  the 
feeder  in  the  autumn  as  calves,  yearlings,  2-year-olds,  or  3-year-olds. 
In  producing  such  cattle  many  of  these  men  will  find  it  necessary  to 
improve  their  herds  greatly,  for  quality  and  not  quantity  is  what  the 
rn    feeder    wants.     Many    of    these    feeders    complain    bitterly 
because  they  can  not  obtain  the  class  of  cattle  they  need.    It  is  notice- 
able that  in  the  sales  of  "feeders  and  stock'ers"  at  Omaha,  duct  _ 
*ock  yards  those  of  poor  quality  are  hard  sellers  and 
I   very  low  figures. 

In  the  South  the  cattlemen  realize  that  they  must  cut  down  their 

herds  and  instead  of  large  ones  of  low-grade  cattle  they  must  raise 

smaller  and  better  herds.   "Many  of  the  cattlemen  are  making  this 

by  culling  out  their  poor-grade  cows  and  heifers  as  fast  as 

can. 

Aa  an  example  of  what  may  be  done  on  the  open  range  under  pres- 
ent overcrowded  conditions,  the  methods  of  a  stockman  living  near 
Reva.  S.  Dak.,  may  be  mentioned.  A  few  years  ago  this  man, 
becoming  dissatisfied  with  the  kind  of  cattle  that  he  was  running, 
bought  a  registered  bull  and  began  to  grade  his  cattle  up.  By  using 
good  registered  Shorthorn  bulls,  which  he  changes  every  three  years, 
and  by  selecting  good-grade  cows,  he  has  been  grading  up  his  herd 
until  now  his  cattle  outweigh  and  outsell  those  in  his  immediate 

_hborhood.  At  first  his  neighbors  made  considerable  sport  of 
him  for  importing  registered  stock  and  prophesied  that  he  would 
make  a  failure  of  it.  Instead  of  a  failure  his  cattle  are  so  much  better 
in  quality  that  they  may  be  distinguished  a  long  distance  away 
;y  by  their  body  outline  and  their  increased  size.  In  order  to 
.  I  :Iie  most  good  out  of  his  animals  this  man  was.  of  course,  obliged 
lo  a  good  deal  more  work  in  taking  care  of  them.  He  found 
it  necessary  to  "line  ride'"  his  range  every  day  in  order  to  keep  his 
stock  from  straying  and  to  see  that  his  bulls  served  his  own  cows  and 
not  those  of  his  neighbors.  This  extra  work  has  paid  him  well,  as 
he  rarely  loses  i  attle  through  straying  and  does  not  need  to  belong 
to  any  of  the  round-up  associations.     The  prime  value  of  this  work 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XII. 


Fig.  1.— A  Stallion  Used  in  Improving  a  Herd  of  Range  Horses  in  North  Dakota. 


Fig.  2.— Range  Horses,  the  Progeny  of  Stallions  like  that  Shown  in  Figure  1 


RANGE    MANAGEMENT.  237 

is  shown  in  his  calf  crop,  which  averages  about  95  per  cent,  while 
that  of  his  neighbors  averages  only  about  60  per  cent. 

Now  that  the  range  is  becoming  so  crowded  that  it  is  difficult  to 
get  sufficient  grass  to  fatten  steers,  he  is  preparing  to  increase  his 
breeding  stock  and  cut  down  the  number  of  his  beef  steers,  so  that 
when  he  can  no  longer  grow  beef  he  will  be  in  a  position  to  dispose  of  a 
high  class  of  feeding  cattle,  which  he  will  aim  to  sell  as  yearlings  or 
2-year-olds  to  eastern  feeders.  This  he  can  do  without  any  sacrifice 
whatever,  as  he  has  a  type  of  cattle  that  is  exactly  such  as  the  feeders 
want  but  find  it  difficult  to  obtain. 

What  has  been  said  of  cattle  holds  equally  true  of  horses.  To-day 
there  is  almost  no  place  for  the  small  horse  or  "cayuse,"  while  good 
animals  are  in  demand.  That  one  can  afford  to  raise  good  horses  on 
the  range  has  been  demonstrated  by  a  stockman  living  in  western 
North  Dakota.  During  a  period  of  low  prices  for  range  horses  this 
man  bought  a  high-priced  stallion.  With  this  animal  and  nine  range 
mares  of  average  size  and  quality  as  a  nucleus  he  built  up  a  fine  herd. 
When  the  stallion  died  he  was  replaced  with  two  registered  Percherons," 
which  continued  to  build  up  the  herd  until  it  was  one  of  the  finest 
herds  of  range  horses  in  the  United  States.  One  of  these  stallions  is 
shown  in  Plate  XII,  figure  1,  while  some  of  the  progeny  are  shown  in 
Plate  XII,  figure  2.  When  this  man  got  his  first  horse  his  neighbors 
believed  that  he  had  made  a  serious  mistake  in  buying  so  expensive  an 
animal.  For  several  years,  while  he  was  building  up  his  herd,  at  which 
time  horses  were  of  almost  no  value,  he  was  considerably  in  debt.  As 
his  stock  began  to  improve  and  the  price  of  horses  increased  he  began 
to  realize  well  from  this  herd,  and  during  the  last  two  years  he  has  sold 
geldings  in  carload  lots  at  $125  a  head,  unbroken.  In  the  summer  of 
1906  he  sold  his  entire  herd,  227  head,  at  $85  a  head  straight  for  all 
branded  stock — an  unusually  high  price  for  range  horses.  There  were 
two  mares  of  his  own  raising  in  this  herd  for  which  the  buyers  refused 
$550  unbroken.  This  man  estimates  that  his  first  stallion  made  for 
him  many  times  what  he  paid  for  it. 

MOVEMENT    TOWARD   FARMING    RANGE    LANDS. 

With  the  first  extension  of  the  railroads  through  the  Western  States 
large  areas  of  land  that  had  been  previously  inaccessible  except  for 
stock  were  taken  up  for  farming  purposes.  At  first  only  the  choice 
areas  that  would  grow  good  grain  crops  or  those  places  that  could  be 
easily  irrigated  were  selected.  Within  the  last  ten  or  twelve  years 
people  have  learned  that,  by  careful  tillage  and  the  use  of  machinery, 
land  that  had  hitherto  been  considered  of  no  value  except  for  grazing 
can  be  made  to  produce  paying  crops  of  grain.  This,  together  with 
the  vast  extension  of  irrigable  lands  through  private  enterprise  and 
the  different  Government  projects,  has  caused  a  heavy  immigration 


238  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

to  these  regions.  If  the  present  demand  for  western  lands  continues 
it  will  be  only  a  short  time  before  all  of  the  public  domain  except  the 
mountainous  portions  and  the  extremely  arid  sections  will  be  taken 
up  for  farming  purp. 

While  the  rapid  strides  that  have  been  made  in  arid-land  cultiva- 
tion make  it  impossible  to  tell  exactly  what  lands  will  produce  -     - 
cessful  crops  for  a  period  of  several  years,  it  would  seem  that  n 
of  the  people  who  have  settled  in  the  arid  region-  will  eventually  be 
compelled  either  to  give  up  their  places  or  combine  stock  ra^ 
with  their  dry-land  farming. 

PROBABLE  FUTURE  OF  RANGE  STOCK  INDUSTRY. 

Present  tendencies  indicate  that  the  range-stock  industry  of  the 
future  will  be  confined  to  those  regions  that  are  too  rough  for  culti- 
vation or  too  arid  for  the  successful  growth  of  crops.  Except  in  the 
high  mountain  regions,  where  the  grazing  season  is  very  short,  or  in 
the  desert  areas,  where,  on  account  of  the  scarcity  of  water,  grazing 
can  be  carried  on  only  during  the  winter  months,  the  grazing  will 
eventually  be  carried  on  in  inclosed  fields  or  on  definitely  assigned 
tracts.  The  stockmen  will  endeavor  to  get  bodies  of  land  large 
enough  to  support  their  stock,  either  by  purchase,  leasing,  or.  in 
case  the  homestead  act  should  be  amended  to  fit  range  conditions, 
by  homesteading.  Many  living  in  close  proximity  to  forest  res- 
will  secure  grazing  permits,  allowing  them  to  run  stock  in  these  areas 
during  the  summer  season.  "Wherever  possible  these  men  will  raise 
enough  feed  to  carry  their  stock  safely  through  the  winter  season. 


THE  PREPARATION  OF  UNFERMENTEI)  APPLE  JUICE. 

By  H.  G.  Gore, 
Of  the  Bureau  of  Chemistry. 

Ail  inexpensive  method  of  preserving  apple  juice  so  that  the  product 
will  be  free  from  objectionable  sediment  and  a  pronounced  "cooked" 
taste,  and  can  be  kept  hi  closed  containers  without  the  use  of  chem- 
ical preservatives,  has  apparently  never  been  devised.  Experimen- 
tal work  was  undertaken  with  a  view  to  developing  such  a  method, 
and  it  is  believed  that  a  satisfactory  procedure  has  been  evolved. 
The  main  problems  were:  (1)  The  clarification  of  the  juice;  (2)  the 
sterilization  of  the  juice;  (3)  the  carbonation  of  the  juice;  and  (4) 
the  question  as  to  the  best  containers  for  the  sterilized  product. 

THE    CLARIFICATION    OF   THE    JUICE. 

Fresh  apple  juice  contains  notable  quantities  of  solid  matter,  which 
will  settle  out  on  prolonged  standing,  forming  a  bulky  deposit.  In 
the  case  of  raw  juice  this  consists  of  dirt  particles,  starch  grains,  frag- 
ments of  the  cell  walls  of  the  apples,  and,  finally,  albuminous  matter, 
yellow-brown  in  color  and  very  bulky.  The  albuminous  matter  com- 
poses by  far  the  greater  part  of  the  sediment.  The  character  of  this 
sediment  when  heated  to  140°  to  158°  F.  (60°  to  70°  C.)  remains 
about  the  same,  except  that  the  starch  grains  are  no  longer  apparent, 
the  starch  being  wholly  or  partly  gelatinized. 

This  sediment  is  very  objectionable,  since  its  presence  seriously 
detracts  from  the  appearance  of  the  finished  juice  after  sterilizing 
by  heat.  In  the  finished  juice  the  albuminous  matter  forms  slimy 
particles,  yellow  to  dark  brown  in  color,  which  very  readily  mix  with 
the  juice  when  agitated,  and  are  slow  to  settle.  The  product  looks 
as  though  the  most  uncleanly  methods  had  been  used  in  its  prepara- 
tion, whereas  the  reverse  may  have  been  the  case.  The  removal  of 
the  materials  which  form  the  sediment  is,  therefore,  one  of  the  most 
important  steps  in  the  preparation  of  a  marketable  product. 

The  methods  at  present  used  for  this  purpose  are  two:  (1)  Filtra- 
tion, and  (2)  sedimentation  of  the  sterilized  juice  in  large  casks. 

Filtration  is  expensive  and  slow,  and,  while  a  product  of  great 
brilliancy  is  obtained,  the  cost  of  the  plant  and  the  operation  of  the 
process  will  undoubtedly  prevent  its  extended  use.     Paper  pulp  is 

239 


240  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGPJCULTUEE. 

ordinarily  employed  for  the  filter  material,  and  the  albuminous  mat- 
ter in  the  juice  quickly  forms  a  dense  layer  over  the  surface.  The 
ensuing  filtration  is  very  slow,  and  a  large  filtering  surface  is  required 
for  practical  use. 

Sedimentation  by  gravity  of  juice  heated  to  140°  to  158°  F.  (60° 
to  70c  C.  .  and  then  allowed  to  cool  in  closed  casks,  is  very  slow. 
Unheated  juice  can  not,  of  course,  be  used,  owing  to  the  fact  that 
fermentation  soon  sets  in.  A  period  of  five  to  seven  days  is  required 
to  produce  a  juice  relatively  free  from  sediment.  At  this  time  as 
much  as  possible  of  the  supernatant  juice  is  withdrawn  from  the  sedi- 
ment. The  objections  to  this  method  lie  in  (1)  the  difficulty  of  keep- 
ing the  juice  sterile  during  the  sedimentation  period;  (2)  the  large 
amount  of  cooperage  required  for  any  considerable  output  of  juice, 
and  (3)  the  fact  that,  owing  to  the  bulk  of  the  sediment,  considerable 
quantities  of  juice  can  not  be  drawn  off.  The  juice  left  with  the 
sediment  is  then  only  suitable  for  vinegar  stock.  In  addition  only 
partial  clarification  is  secured.  These  objections  to  sedimentation 
are  the  result  of  numerous  tests  with  barrel  lots  of  juice. 

A  method  of  clarification  which  is  free  from  the  above  objections, 
and  is  also  cheap  and  may  be  applied  on  a  small  or  large  scale,  is  clari- 
fication by  use  of  a  cream  separator.  Repeated  trials  have  shown 
that  a  cream  separator  can  successfully  clarify  the  juice,  leaving  onl}7" 
s  of  sediment  in  the  product.  Absolute  clearness  of  the  juice  is 
not  produced  by  use  of  the  machine,  but  practically  all  sediment  can 
be  removed  by  this  process.  In  the  experimental  work  to  be  described 
a  hand-power  cream  separator  of  the  disk  type  was  employed.  The 
first  trial  of  the  method  indicated  that  a  satisfactory  clarification  of 
apple  juice  could  readily  be  obtained  by  use  of  the  separator,  and 
many  further  trials  have  confirmed  these  early  indications.  The  sus- 
pended matter  in  the  juice  collects  in  the  bowl  of  the  separator,  while 
the  clean  juice  runs  out  through  the  milk  and  cream  screws.  After  a 
run  of  the  juice  through  the  machine,  the  heavier  particles  originally 
present — the  starch  grains  and  any  soil  or  dirt  particles,  together  with 
some  albuminous  matter — are  to  be  found  tightly  packed  in  the  lower 
of  the  tubular  shaft  in  the  bowl  of  the  machine,  while  a  heavy 
layer  of  albuminous  material  is  invariably  packed  on  the  inner  side  of 
the  bowl  and  a  lighter  layer  on  the  inner  side  of  the  bowl  cover.  The 
disks  remain  quite  free  from  sediment.  When  the  space  between  the 
disks  and  the  sides  of  the  bowl  is  quite  filled  with  sediment,  the  flow 
from  the  milk  screw  ceases  and  the  flow  from  the  cream  screw  is  much 
increased.  At  this  time  the  machine  should  be  stopped  and  the  bowl 
cleaned.  The  juice  from  the  milk  screw  is  invariably  considerably 
clearer  than  that  from  the  cream  screw.  The  reason  for  this  is  not 
apparent:  the  fact,  however,  was  always  observed.  The  juice  from 
the  cream  screw  is.  in  turn,  much  clearer  than  the  untreated  juice. 


PKEPAKATIOX    OF    UXFERMEXTED    APPLE    JUICE.  241 

An  extended  series  of  tests  established  the  following  facts  with 
regard  to  the  method  of  clarifying  by  passing  through  a  separator, 
using  unfermented  juice  and  a  machine  of  the  size  indicated: 

First.  The  amount  which  may  be  run  through  the  machine  before 
it  is  necessary  to  stop  and  clean  the  bowl  is  from  25  to  40  gallons, 
depending  on  the  quantity  of  sediment  present  in  the  juice. 

Second.  The  rate  at  which  the  juice  passes  through  the  machine  is 
about  45  gallons  per  hour,  where  a  delivery  tube  of  450  pounds  per 
hour  (for  milk)  is  employed.  On  fitting  the  separator  with  a  delivery 
tube  of  750  pounds  capacity  per  hour,  less  perfect  clarification  was 
effected  than  when  the  smaller  delivery  tube  was  used. 

Third.  But  very  little  increase  in  the  degree  of  clarification  or  capac- 
ity for  sediment  was  secured  when  juice  heated  to  140°  to  158°  F.  (60° 
to  70°  C.)  was  run  through. 

Fourth.  When  heated  juice  was  allowed  to  stand  over  night  and  to 
cool  and  settle  before  passing  through  the  separator,  the  supernatant 
juice  contained  much  less  sediment  than  the  original  juice  and  two  to 
three  times  as  much  could  be  passed  through  the  machine  before 
cleaning  became  necessary  than  when  unsedimented  juice  was  used. 

Fifth.  Two  separations  are  necessary  when  working  with  a  "sepa- 
rator of  the  size  employed.  The  first  treatment  removes  the  bulk  of 
the  sediment,  and  the  second  takes  out  nearly  all  of  the  remainder. 

Sixth.  Running  the  juice  more  than  twice  through  the  separator 
improves  the  character  of  the  product  but  little,  as  only  very  small 
amounts  of  the  suspended  matter  in  the  juice  are  removed. 

Seventh.  The  best  conditions,  as  worked  out  by  experiment,  for 
clarifying  apple  juice,  are  as  follows,  working  with  a  hand  machine 
with  a  capacity  for  milk  of  450  pounds  per  hour. 

(a)  The  juice  must  be  freshly  expressed  and,  to  be  of  high  quality, 
should  be  prepared  from  sound,  well-ripened  fall  or  winter  apples. 

(b)  It  should  be  received  in  a  clean  barrel  or  cask,  which  must  not 
contain  any  fermentation  residues."  This  point  is  very  important,  as 
experience  has  shown  that  the  very  fine  deposit  formed  in  fermenting 
juice  can  not  be  successfully  removed  by  the  separator,  and  this 
deposit  is  difficult  to  clean  from  the  sides  and  bottoms  of  fermentation 
casks. 

(c)  The  juice  is  then  passed  through  the  separator,  using  the  neces- 
sary precautions  as  to  oiling  and  starting  the  machine,  and  turning  the 
crank  at  the  rate  of  45  turns  per  minute.  Twenty-five  to  forty  gal- 
lons of  fresh  juice  can  be  run  through  before  the  capacity  of  the  bowl 
for  sediment  is  reached.  The  juice  which  comes  through  the  milk 
screw  is  collected  separately. 

(d)  As  soon  as  the  milk  screw  becomes  clogged  the  machine  is 
stopped  and  the  bowl  is  cleaned. 

3    a  1906 10 


242  K    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

(e)  The  juice  collected  from  tlie  milk  screw  1-  j  assed  through  again 

•  he  juice  then  coming  from  the  milk  -  before. 

The  clarii:  >ns  of  juice,  using  i  hine  of  the 

ic&y  indicated  and  a  jui  ining  sedun*  .ch  quantity 

that  a  run  of  that  amount  would  fill  the  space  between  the  disks  and 

the  sides  of  the  bowl  with  sediment,  requires  about  one  hour  and  a 

qua  irough  the  bowl  twice. 

THE    STEELLIZATIOX    OF    THE    JV. 

-  soon  as  the  juice  is  clarified 
ized  in  closed  containers.     The  points  which  have  been  carefully 
med  in  this  work  have  been  the  lowest  safe  temperature  and 
the  shortest  pe:  mating  for  bottles  and  for  cans. 

If  the  not  to  be  packed  and  shipped,  fruit  jar 

dth  patent  stoppers,  may  be  employed,  but  to  -tand  shipping 
well,  sealed  cans  ;st  be  used. 

i>:  bott: 

In  the  work  with  bottles,  quart  1  -  of  the  champagne  type  were 

These  were  filled  with  clarifh  some  air  space  being  left 

•low  for  expansion  of  the  liquid  on  heating.     The  bottles  were 
ed  upright   and  entirely  submerged  in  water  in  a  tank  which 
could  be  heated  by  a  jet   of  steam.  it   fifteen  minutes  were 

required  to  bring  the  water  in  the  tank  up  to  the  tern}  -  em- 

•d  in  the  sever  .         -     >f  experiments,  nam  :.   140' . 

F.    60°      i  .  .     -rift  .  the 

tank  from  twenty-fr  -  were  required  for  the  con- 

tents of  the 

e  begin:.:    a  imt  tim  -  — 

fifteen  minui  lemperatu:-?.  and  fifteen 

minutes  holding  at  this  temperature  for  the  juice  in  the  bottle  to 

in  the  bath  temperature.     The  bottles  were  withdrawn  at  inter- 

and  set  away  on  their  sides  in  baskets,  being  kept  in  a  warm 

room  whose  temperature  was  quite  c  day  and  night,  between 

3  were  agitated  and  notes  taken  on  them 
from  day  to  day. 

e  results  show  that  a  temperature  of  149°  F.       5°  C.     for  one 
hour  jive  good  results  and  that   158°  F.     7  for  one-half 

hour  also  gives  good  results.     Only  a  ver.  cooked 

given    to    the    juice    b;  15S°    for    one    hour — slightly 

than  is  given  by  heating        .  .      for  the  same  pei 


PREPARATION    OF    EXFEEriEXTED    APPLE    JUICE.  243 

STERILIZING    IX    CANS. 

One-gallon  packers'  cans  were  employed.  These  were  first  care- 
fully rinsed  with  water,  filled,  sealed  (rosin  dissolved  in  alcohol  being 
used  as  flux),  and  then  heated  in  the  same  manner  as  the  bottles. 
The  juices  employed  were  thoroughly  typical  and  were  clarified  by 
passing  twice  through  the  separator.  A  full  half  hour  was  found  by 
a  careful  test  to  be  necessary  for  heating  the  contents  of  the  can  up 
to  the  bath  when  the  water  in  the  bath  was  cold  to  start  with,  and 
this  period  was  only  slightly  shortened  when  the  bath  was  hot  at  the 
time  the  cans  were  placed  in  it. 

Unfortunately,  the  periods  of  heating  were  not  short  enough  nor 
the  temperatures  used  low  enough  to  indicate  unsafe  conditions, 
since  none  of  the  cans  spoiled;  but  proper  treatment  was  found  to  be 
very  readily  given  at  low  temperatures  and  for  brief  periods.  It 
was  expected  that  the  cans  which  were  only  heated  up  to  140°  F. 
(65°  C.)  in  the  hot  water  and  then  removed  would  surely  spoil. 
These  cans  remained  sound,  however,  and  thus  the  period  of  heating 
indicated  as  sufficient  for  canning  is  unexpectedly  short.  When  the 
cans  were  removed,  they  were  cooled  over  night  and  allowed  to  stand 
in  the  same  room  as  that  hi  which  the  bottles  were  held.  Owing  to 
the  large  bulk  of  jniee  in  the  cans  of  the  size  employed  (1  gallon),  it 
is  evident  that  the  juice  was  maintained  at  a  sterilizing  temperature 
longer  than  if  bottles  or  small-sized  cans  had  been  used.  This  fact 
must  be  kept  in  mind  if  the  results  here  obtained  are  applied  to  other 
sizes  than  gallon  cans. 

THE    CAEBOXATIOX    OF    TTIE    JI'ICE. 

In  addition  to  experimental  work  on  clarifying  and  on  heating  the 
juice,  investigations  were  made  on  carbonating  it  with  a  view  to  dis- 
guising the  slight  cooked  taste  which  it  is  impossible  entirely  to  avoid. 
Carbonating  also  increases  the  palatability  of  the  juice  hi  the  opinion 
of  many  persons.  The  method  used  consisted  in  carbonating  the 
juice  under  slight  pressure  and  then  heating  in  bottles  or  cans,  and 
no  difficulty  was  encountered.  In  the  simple  experiments  devised 
and  carried  on  in  connection  with  this  work,  the  carbon  dioxid  (car- 
bonic-acid gas)  was  secured  from  a  firm  handling  soda-water  sup- 
plies. It  was  obtained  in  liquid  form  in  a  steel  cylinder  furnished 
with  a  reduction  valve  and  a  gauge  and  delivery  tube,  so  as  to 
deliver  at  pressures  up  to  30  pounds. 

After  clarification,  the  juice  was  carbonated  by  pouring  it  into  a 
clean  keg  and  running  in  the  gas  up  to  a  pressure  of  15  pounds.  The 
keg  was  provided  with  a  thick  pine  bung,  through  the  middle  of 
which  was  bored  a  half-inch  hole,  which  received  the  rubber  delivery 
tube  from  the  cylinder  of  compressed  gas.     The  bung  was  soaked  in 


244  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

bt  for  a  few  niinutes  before  use.  so  that  it  could  be  driven  in  to 
make  a  tight  joint,  and  was  so  fitted  that  it  projected  beyond  the 
surface  of  the  keg  and  could  be  readily  loosened  when  carbonation 
nnished.  About  12  gallons  of  juice  were  poured  into  the  keg. 
Carbon  dioxid  was  admitted  before  driving  the  bung  in  air-tight  in 
order  to  expel  the  air  which  fills  the  space  in  the  keg  not  occupied 
bv  the  juice.  The  bung  was  then  driven  in  by  tapping  with  a  ham- 
mer and  more  gas  admitted.  The  keg  was  vigorously  rocked  so  as  to 
thoroughly  agitate  the  juice  and  so  accelerate  the  absorption  of  the 

The  gauge  was  watched,  and  in  these  experiments  the  pressure  was 
not  allowed  to  go  beyond  15  pounds  per  square  inch.  The  juice 
used  in  the  carbonating  work  was  quite  cool,  ranging  from  4S°  to  6S° 
F.  _      '       in  the  different  experiments.     As  the  carbonating  of 

liquids  is  apparently  well  understood,  no  attempts  were  made  to  cor- 
relate the  pressure,  temperature,  and  amount  of  gas  which  could  be 
ived  in  the  juice.     In  these  experiments  the  juice  was  carbon- 
ated at  a  pressure  not  exceeding  15  pounds  until  a  sample  was  drawn 
ing  distinctly  of  the  gas,  this  being  the  amount  of  carbonation 
.  ed.     Working  under  these  conditions  in  the  different  trials,  from 
fifteen  minutes  to  one-half  hour  was  required  to  carbonate  12  gallons 
of  juice.     The  stream  of  gas  was  then  stopped,  the  bung  cautiously 
I     ->ned,  the  contents  of  the  keg  poured  out,  and  the  juice  bottled 
or  canned. 

The  gas  remains  for  some  time  in  the  juice  when  under  atmos- 
pheric pressure  and  only  gradually  diminishes  in  quantity,  so  that 
t  haste  in  sealing  the  juice  is  not  necessary.  If  the  carbonated 
juice  is  to  be  sterilized  in  cans  they  must  be  heated  in  stout  frames 
to  prevent  distortion  of  the  can  while  hot  and  consequent  bursting. 
The  finished  canned  product  bulg  -  the  ends  of  the  cans  to  some 
::  :it,  but  not  enough  to  cause  permanent  bending.  The  juice  must 
d  I  be  too  highly  charged  with  the  gas  nor  removed  from  the  frames 
while  still  hot,  or  such  bending,  with  consequent  weakening  of  the 
soldered  joints  and  bursting  of  the  can,  may  occur. 

THE    BEST    CONTAINERS    FOB    STERILIZED    JUICE. 

In  the  work  with  juice  treated  as  above  described,  bottles  and  cans 
have  been  used  as  containers.  The  other  containers  which  might 
have  been  tried  were  barrels  or  kegs,  and  jugs.  Owing  to  the  great 
liability  to  leakage  and  consequent  infection  of  juice  when  treated 
in  barrels  and  kegs,  these  containers  are  considered  impracticable 
when  the  juice  is  to  be  kept  indefinitely.  Jugs  are  considered  to  be 
cumbersome  and  at  the  same  time  too  fragile  to  be  handled 
lily  in  comparison  with  cans. 


PKEPARATION    OF    TJNFERMENTED    APPLE    JUICE. 


245 


&  <sr£w+r 


For  bottles,  sound  corks,  well  soaked  in  hot  water,  should  be  used. 
These  can  be  wired  in  before  the  bottles  are  heated;  or  tin  cork  hold- 
ers, which  may  be  bought  on  the  market,  may  be  used.  The  exposed 
end  of  the  cork  should  be  dipped  in  hot  paraffin  or  hot  grafting  wax 
after  heating,  to  prevent  the  cork  from  drying  out  with  consequent 
serious  danger  of  infection  of  the  bottled  juice. 

No  trouble  was  experienced  in  sealing  the  cans.  As  previously 
noted,  standard  1-gallon  packers'  cans  were  employed.  These  had  a 
2jVinch  opening  and  were  filled  to  within  about  one-quarter  inch  of 
the  opening.  The  can  was  then  wiped  and  the  flux,  consisting  of 
rosin  dissolved  in  alcohol,  was  applied. 
Hemmed  caps  were  employed  for  seal- 
ing— that  is,  the  tin  cover  which  fitted 
over  the  opening  in  the  can  was  fitted 
with  a  rim  of  solder.  For  sealing  the 
can,  a  capping  steel  and  soldering  cop- 
per are  required,  also  a  gasoline  fur- 
nace for  heating  the  steel  and  copper, 
and  a  supply  of  flux,  solder,  and  sal 
ammoniac. 

Barrels  and  kegs  can  be  successfully 
used  as  containers  for  sterilized  juice 
when  it  is  desired  to  keep  the  juice 
sweet  for  a  limited  period  of  a  few 
days  or  weeks.  The  cask  must  be 
thoroughly  cleaned  and  well  steamed, 
and  filled  with  the  juice  heated  to  be- 
tween 149°  and  158°  F.  (65°  and  70° 
C).  The  cask  can  then  be  bune;ed, 
out  considerable  contraction  takes 
place  on  cooling,  with  resulting  strain 
on  the  cask  and  consequent  increase  in 
the  danger  of  leakage.  It  is  a  much 
better  procedure  to  close  with  a  clean 
cotton  plug,  and  when  the  cask  and 
contents  are  cool  to  remove  the  plug 
and  quickly  insert  a  wooden  -bung  which  has  been  sterilized  by  soak- 
ing in.  alcohol.  Two  experiments  were  carried  on  with  success  with 
50-gallon  barrels,  following  this  procedure.  This  juice  kept  for  ten 
days  without  showing  fermentation.  At  this  time  the  barrels  were 
emptied  and  used  for  other  purposes. 

In  the  experiments  with  barrels,  and  in  all  other  work  in  which 
the  juice  was  heated  except  in  bottles  and  cans,  a  pasteurizer  (fig.  4) 
designed  by  Mr.  Given,  of  the  Bureau  of  Chemistry,  was  employed. 
It  proved  to  be  a  very  useful  machine  and  was  capable  of  heating 
the  juice  with  perfect  control  of  temperature  at  any  desired  rate  up 
to  several  hundred  gallons  per  hour. 


«vtfr  rot?  */u/C£~ 


Fig.  4.— Pasteurizer  for  apple  juice. 


246  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DBPA  1    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Th<  -  :  handling  apple  juice  when  it  can  be  obtained  perfectly 
fresh  in  clean  barrels  is  slight.  The  only  expense  of  separating  the 
juice  is  for  the  labor,  and  if  a  small  steam  generator  be  used  in  con- 
nection with  a  turbine  separator  this  cost  can  probably  be  lessened. 
Bottles  of  the  champagne  type  cost  from  3  to  5  cents  each,  and 
gallon  cans  t  "  ich  in  lots  of  1.000.     On  account 

of  the  acid  nature  of  apple  juice,  the  cans  employed  be  made 

.  grade  of  tin  plate  and.  as  with  other  canned  products,  the 
juiee  not  be  allowed  to  stand  in  the  can  after  opening.     With 

a  view  to  les  the  action  of  the  juice  on  the  walls  of  the  can, 

lacquering  the  inside  of  the  can  with  a  vegetable  gum  was  tried. 
isiderably  less  action  of  the  juice  on  the  tin  was  noted  when  the 
lacquered  can  was  used. 

-rilizing  requires  a  tank  of  water  which  can  be  heated  by  steam 
or  in  any  other  way  so  that  it  can  be  easily  maintained  at  the  desired 
temperature.  The  apparatus  for  carbonating  is  simple  and  cheap, 
and  the  method  is  easy  of  application. 

The  chemical  work  in  connection  with  the  experiment  has  been  to 

determine  the  composition  of  the  juices  employed  and  the  effect  of 

the  treatment  on  the  composition  of  the  juice.     The  results  of  this 

:  show  that  the  chemical  composition  is  practically  unchanged 

ie  treatment  of  clarifying,  carbonating,  and  heating. 


FOREIGN   RESTRICTIONS    ON   AMERICAN    MEAT. 

By  Fkaxk  Pi.  But. 
Assistant  ChUj.  Division  of  Ft  '  Cms. 

The  preeminence  of  t lie  United  States  in  the  meat  supply  ol  the 
worid  has  been  attained  in  spite  of  obstacles  of  many  kinds.  By 
high  tariff  rates,  by  severe  restrictions,  and  even  by  direct  prohibi- 
tions, the  markets  of  Europe  have  been  made  difficult  of  capture  on 
the  part  of  our  exporters.  In  spite  of  all  difficulties,  the  United  States 
has  come. to  export  in  a  single  average  year  a  greater  value  of  live 
stock  and  packing-house  products  than  its  six  leading  competitors 
combined  in  any  two  years. 

i  overcome  obstacles  in  the  way  of  trade  expansion,  it  is  of  the 
utmost  importance  to  know  precisely  the  nature  of  the  restrictions. 
To  this  end.  at  the  request  of  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture,  the  State 
Department,  with  the  aid  of  our  diplomatic  representatives  abroad, 
obtained  and  transmitted  to  the  Department  of  Agriculture  a  valuable 
collection  of  the  laws  and  regulations  in  force  in  the  principal  foreign 
countries.  These  enactments,  supplemented  by  additional  informa- 
tion obtained  by  a  careful  search  through  other  available  sources, 
form  the  basis  of  the  present  paper. 

GROWTH    OF    MEAT    EXPOETS. 

The  development  of  the  live-stock  and  meat  exports  of  the  United 
States  is  of  comparatively  recent  origin.  During  the  five  years  ending 
June  30,.  1870,  the  average  exports  of  this  class  were  valued  at 
$17,000,000  (gold)  and  formed  7  per  cent  of  the  total  exports  of  agri- 
cultural products.  Thirty-five  years  later,  during  the  five  fiscal  } 
1901-1905,  the  average  value  of  the  live  stock  and  packing-house 
products  annually  exported  from  this  country  reached  over  $228,- 
000.000  and  represented  26  per  cent  of  our  total  agricultural  exports. 
The  increase  in  this  line  of  trade  since  the  civil  war  has  been  continu- 
ous, and  during  the  last  five  years  for  the  first  time  the  average  live 
stock  and  packing-house  products  exported  from  the  United  States 
exceeded  in  value  the  exports  of  gram  and  grain  products,  ranking 
second  in  importance  only  to  cotton.  As  compared  with  total  agri- 
cultural exports,  live  stock  and  packing-house  products  reached  the 
highest  percentage  in  1S96-1900. 

247 


24S 


YEAKBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Four  items — pork.  lard,  live  cattle,  and  beef — comprise  the  bulk  of 
the  shipments  of  live  stock  and  packing-house  products  from  the 
United  States,  representing  generally  between  SO  and  90  per  cent  of 
the  total.  The  essential  feature  of  the  progress  of  tins  line  of  trade  is 
the  much  earlier  development  of  pork  and  lard  exports  than  of  the 

exports  of  cattle  and 
beef.  During  the  five 
years  ending  June  30, 
1875,  the  average  ex- 
ports of  pork  and  lard 
constituted  over  75  per 
cent  of  the  total  ex- 
ports of  live  animals 
and  packing-house 
products,  while  live 
cattle  and  beef  com- 
prised only  7  per  cent. 
During  the  thirty  years 
subsequent  to  that  pe- 
riod, the  exports  of  live 
cattle  and  beef  had 
grown  to  32  per  cent 
of  the  total,  while  pork 
and  lard  constituted  50 
per  cent.  The  rapid 
increase  in  the  cattle 
and  beef  exports  is 
illustrated  in  figure  5. 

The  sudden  rise  of 
cattle  and  beef  exports 
into  importance  during 
the  years  1S75  to  1SS0 
is  a  most  striking  fea- 
ture of  the  trade  and 
calls  for  special  expla- 
nation. The  regular 
export  of  fresh  beef  in 
ships  provided  with  re- 
frigerating apparatus  began  for  the  first  time  in  the  fall  of  1S75  and  in- 
creased rapidly.  In  1 877  live  cattle  were  exported  inconsiderable  num- 
bers. The  area  of  grazing  land  available  for  settlement  in  the  West  and 
Xorthwest  was  enormously  enlarged  by  the  construction  of  the  Pacific 
railroads  in  the  late  sixties  and  early  seventies,  and  the  increased  sup- 
ply of  cattle  called  for  new  markets.     On  the  other  side  of  the  ocean 


Fig 


5.— Value  of  pork,  laid,  cattle,  and  beef  exported  from  the 
United  States,  1S60-1906. 


FOREIGN    RESTRICTIONS    OX    AMERICAN    MEAT.  249 

the  needs  of  the  market  called  for  new  lines  of  supply.  The 
United  Kingdom  in  1S76  imported  cattle  (not  including  calves) 
from  the  continent  of  Europe  to  the  number  of  222,000.  At  that 
time  cattle  were  admitted  freely  from  most  European  countries 
and  from  the  remainder  (except  Russia")  on  condition  of  immediate 
slaughter.  The  severe  outbreak  of  rinderpest  throughout  Europe 
in  1ST"  decreased  enormously  the  imports  into  the  United  Kingdom 
from  the  continent.  The  supply  from  Germany  and  Belgium 
was  absolutely  excluded  by  decree  of  June  27.  1S77:  importation 
from  Russia  was  already  prohibited;  and  the  ravages  of  the  disease 
cut  down  the  number  available  for  shipment.  In  1S77  the  imports  of 
cattle  from  the  continent  decreased  70.000  head.  This  condition  of 
affairs  warranted  immediate  shipments  from  the  United  States. 
which  rapidly  increased  in  number  and  soon  formed  an  important 
part  of  the  British  supply.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  first 
opening  for  American  cattle  was  caused  in  part  at  least  by  the  exercise 
of  the  power  of  restriction  for  sanitary  purposes  which  subsequently 
has  affected  so  injuriously  the  exports  of  American  annuals  and 
animal  products. 

PROHIBITIONS    AFFECTING    PORK. 

The  important  laws  and  decrees  excluding  United  States  meat  and 
live  stock  from  foreign  countries  fall  generally  into  two  periods,  the 
first  covering  pork  and  the  second  cattle  and  beef. 

The  earliest  of  these  regulations  affecting  the  imports  of  pork, 
including  bacon  and  hams,  from  the  United  States  were  issued  during 
the  decade  following  1S79.  Swine  products  from  the  United  States 
had  begun  to  reach  continental  Europe  in  large  quantities  and  were 
sold  usually  at  prices  below  those  charged  for  similar  native  products. 
For  alleged  sanitary  reasons,  several  countries  provided  for  a  total 
exclusion  of  these  products.  On  February  20,  1S70.  the  Italian  Gov- 
ernment issued  a  decree  prohibiting  the  importation  of  swine,  pork, 
and  hog  products  from  the  United  States.  Less  than  three  months 
later  this  prohibition  was  made  to  apply  generally  to  such  products,  no 
matter  from  what  country  imported.  Portugal  followed  the  example 
of  Italy  in  March.  1879,  excluding  pork  and  other  hog  products  used 
for  food  when  imported  from  the  United  States.  Hungary  issued  a 
similar  order  in  September.  1S79:  Spain  and  Germany  in  1880; 
France.  Turkey,  and  Roumania  in  1881;  Greece  in  1S83,  and  Den- 
mark in  1888.  In  1SS1  the  exclusion  of  swine,  pork  (including  bacon) . 
and  sausages  from  the  United  States  was  made  applicable  to  the  entire 
Austro-Hungarian  Empire,  and  in  1SS3  the  earlier  German  decree  was 
extended  so  as  to  prohibit  the  importation  of  swine  and  bacon  and 
hams,  as  well  as  other  kinds  of  pork  and  sausages.  The  Netherlands 
in    1885    excluded    swine    comins:    from    the   United    States.     The 


250  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    PEPAUTMEXT    OS    AOETCULTUEE. 

prohibit!  ably  in  Greece,  Roumania,  and  Turkey,  did 

not  cover  rendered  lard. 

The  restrictions  of  France  and  Germany  naturally  proved  h 
injurious  te  eh  r  trade.     In  the  fiscal  year  ending  June  30,  1881,  ihe 
United  States  exported  no  less  than  GS, 000, 000  pounds  of  bacon  and 
ban:  -  tee,  valued  at  nearly  -So. 000, 000.     To  Germany  during  the 

same  year  the  < :  :'  bacon  and  hams  readied  nearly  42,000,000 

poun  3.000.000.     The  sudden  stop  to  these  in 

lines  of  trade,  forcing  the  products  to  find  new  markets 
preventing  entirely  their  sale  abroad,  led  this  Government  to  make 
the  t    efforts    to    have    the    restriction^    removed.     Sfx 

inquiry  was  made  as  fco  the  health  of  swine  in  the  United  Stab 
compared  with  those  abroad,  and  the  German  Government  wm 
invited  to  name  a  representative  on  a  commission  appointed  by  the 
President  to  report  upon  this  subject.  Tins  invitation  was  not 
accepted.  The  reason  for  the  prohibitions  given  and  tenaci 
maintained  by  the  foreign  governments  was  that  the  present  of 
trie!  I  in  American  products  in  many  «. 

and  that  it  then  practii  stitute  a  sufficiently  1 

or.gh  mil  tion  on  importation  to  guarantee  that   no 

affected  meat  should  be  passed.  No  prospect  of  a  modification  of  the 
decree  was  held  out  unless  a  thorough  inspection  should  be  instituted 
on  the  part  of  the  United  -  before  exportation. 

In  1891  the  Department  of  Agriculture  undertook  the  inspection, 
as  far  as  pra  .  of  all  pork  and  beef  for  exportation.     Follow- 

ing this  action.  Germany.  Denmark.  Italy.  France.  Austria-Hungary, 
and  finally  Spain,  modified  their  regula  . -  -  -  to  admit  swine 
acts  from  the  United  States  on  presentation  of  an  official  certifi- 
cate. Greece  had  already  withdrawn -its  prohibition  early  in  lvs43 
so  that  the  only  countries  in  which  the  prohibit] 

tained  were  Portugal.  Roumania,  and  Turkey,  while  swine  continued 
to  be  prohibited  by  Denmark,  Italy,  and  the  Netherlands* 

The  decade  during  which  pork  shipments  from  the  United  States 
were  so  severely  restricted  witnessed  not  merely  a  temporary  loss. 
Exports  to  Germany,  it  is  true,  reached  in  the  fiscal  year  1898  a  point 
higher  than  that  attained  in  any  previous  year  except  1873.  In  no 
other  year,  however,  were  the  figures  of  ls:>l  equaled,  and  subse- 
quently another  decline  occurred,  bringing  the  exports  of  bacon 
and  hams  from  the  United  States  to  Germany  d  >wn  to  less  than 
10.000.000  pounds  in  the  fiscal  year  1905,  and  only  1.">.m>0,000  pounds 
in  1906,  notwithstanding  the  increased  shipments  that  took  place 
during  the  early  part  of  the  year  to  avoid  the  anticipated  increase  in 
duties  that  took  place  on  March  1. 

In  the  case  of  France,  the  highest  point  reached  by  the  bacon  and 
ham  shipments  from  the  United  States  after  1881  was  in  the  year 


FOREIGN    RESTRICTIONS    OX    AMERICAN    MEAT.  251 

ending  June  30,  1900,  when  the  exports  amounted  to  14.000,000 
pounds,  valued  at  about  si. 000. 000.  only  about  one-fifth  of  the  mag- 
nitude of  the  trade  before  the  prohibition  went  into  effect.  Moreover, 
by  a  considerable  drop  since  1900,  the  shipments  in  the  fiscal  year 
1906  fell  to  133.000  pound.-,  valued  at  $13,000.  The  effect  of  the 
pork  restrictions  is  clearly  seen  in  figure  5, 

PROHIBITIONS    AFFECTIXG    CATTLE    AXD    BEEF. 

The  second  period  of  special  prohibitions  against  American  products 
began  in  1894.  In  the  latter  part  of  that  year  various  German  States 
issued  decrees  prohibiting  the  importation  of  cattle  and  fresh  beef 
from  '•America."  Denmark,  which  since  1879  had  excluded  cattle 
from  the  United  States,  published  a  similar  order:  and  Belgium  pro- 
hibited the  importation  of  United  States  cattle.  Early  the  following 
year  France  likewise  prohibited  the  importation  of  cattle  from  the 
United  States.  The  cause  assigned  by  Germany  was  the  prevalence 
of  Texas  fever  in  this  country.  Belgium  explained  its  prohibition  by 
the  need  of  preventing  the  introduction  of  contagions  pler.ro-pneu- 
monia.  while  France  attributed  its  action  to  the  presence  of  diseases 
not  existing  in  France.  The  magnitude  of  the  trade  thus  destroyed 
is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  the  exports  of  cattle  from  the  United 
States  to  Germany.  Belgium,  and  France  in  the  year  ending  June  30, 
1895,  during  part  of  which  the  trade  was  prohibited,  were  valued  at 

$i.soo,ooo/ 

The  exclusion  of  United  States  cattle  from  Belgium  was  of  com- 
paratively short  duration.  The  prohibition  was  withdrawn  May  25, 
'.  but  the  immediate  slaughter  of  cattle  imported  from  trans- 
Atlantic  countries  was  required.  In  June.  1899,  Germany  prohibited 
the  importation  of  fresh  beef  from  Belgium.0  The  prohibitions  of 
Germany,  Denmark,  and  France  are  still  in  force,  and  in  the  case  of 
Germany  and  Denmark  cover  fresh  beef  as  well  as  live  cattle. 

EESTRICTIVE  AXD  PROHLBITOEY  EXACTMEXTS   OF  VARIOUS   COUXTRIES. 

The  various  countries  which  have  raised  special  requirements  for 
the  admission  of  live  stock  and  meat  haA-e  brought  about  this  result 
in  widely  different  ways.  While  it  is  important  to  bear  hi  mind  the 
two  special  cycles  of  restriction — the  first  affecting  pork  products, 
the  second  cattle — to  which  attention  has  already  been  directed,  it 
is  necessary  to  describe  separately  the  measures  adopted  by  each  of 
the  principal  countries. 

AUSTRIA-HUNGARY'.-    FAR-RE  ACHING    RESTRICTIONS. 

f  p  to  the  close  of  1905,  the  great  bulk  of  the  live  stock  imported 
into  Austria-Hungary  came  from  Servia  and  was  entered  at  reduced 
rates   of  duty  under   a    treaty   which    terminated    February,    1906. 

a  Foreign  Relations,  1900.  pp.  493-195. 


2-52  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMEXT    OF    AGRICULTV 

Failure  of  ne_  new  treaty  was  followed  by  restrictions 

and  even  prohibitions  that  practically  cut  off  the  importation  of  Ser- 
vian live  stock. 

In  July.  1906,  foreign  supplies  were  further  reduced  by  decrees  pro- 
hibiting in  general  the  importation  of  animals  and  meat  from  coun- 
tries outside  of  Europe,  except  in  special  cases  with  the  permission  of 
the  minister  of  the  interior.  This  restriction  affects  the  United 
States,  except  as  to  swine,  pork,  bacon,  and  sa  _  -  hen  accom- 
panied by  a  certificate  of  the  United  States  Department  of  Agri- 
culture attesting  their  microscopic  inspection  in  this  country. 

IMMEDIATE    SLAUGH:  .TTLE    IX    BELGIUM. 

No  direct  prohibition  of  the  importation  of  live  stock  or  m 
from  the  United  States  into  Belgium  is  at  present  in  force.  The 
conditions  to  which  the  importation  of  live  animals  into  Belgium 
from  countries  across  the  sea  are  subjected  require  their  entry  at 
Antwerp.  Ghent,  or  Ostend.  and  their  slaughter  in  the  public  abattoirs 
of  those  cities  within  three  days. 

GENERAL    7-1    LUSEOH    BY   DENMARK. 

The  law  of  Denmark  is  very  strict  in  regard  to  the  animals  and 
animal  products  admitted  from  non-Scandinavian  countries.  All 
animals  imported  from  Sweden  and  Norway,  and  horses  imported 
also  from  other  countries,  are  subjected  inert  ly  to  sanitary  inspec- 
tion at  the  expense  of  the  consignee.  Ruminants  and  swine  from 
the  United  Kingdom  and  Finland  are  liable  to  "limited  prohibition." 
which  covers  the  importation  of  animals  of  the  kind; 
casings,  unless  air-dried  and  salted,  horns  and  hoofs,  unwashed  wool, 
milk,  hay  and  straw,  and  manure.  From  all  other  countries  the 
s   -  general  prohibition"   of  ruminants   and  swine,   together 

with  fresh  meat  and  all  raw  products  of  those  animals,  is  in  force.  In 
consequence  the  imports  into  Denmark  from  the  United  States  do 
not   include  any  live  meat   ani:.  _■   the  packing-house 

product-  nly  meat  (other  than  fresh  .  lard,  tallow  and  - 

and  oleomargarin  and  oleo  oil.     Pork  and  swine  products  not  pre- 
pared, including  bladders  and  unrefh.  an  lard,  may  be  imp' 
from  the  United  States  if  accompanied  by  an  ofrL  ncate  of 
inspection. 

- 

The  important  restrictions  on  United  States  products  are  1 1  the 
prohibition  of  cattle  sine-  "     _'   the  requirement  for  salted,  smoked, 

or  pickled  pork  of  a  United  Stat  -  certificate  of  inspection,  entry  at 
one  of  six  ports,  and  on  arrival  reinspection  at  the  cost  of  the  con- 
signee:  (3)   the  inspection  of  sausages  from  the  United  States,  for 


FOREIGN    RESTRICTIONS    OX    AMERICAN    MEAT.  253 

which,  however,  no  fee  is  charged.  These  special  restrictions,  together 
with  discriminating  tariff  rates,  have  placed  the  United  States  at  a 
great  disadvantage  as  compared  with  its  competitors.  In  1904  less 
than  10  per  cent  of  the  live  animals  and  packing-house  products 
imported  into  France  came  from  the  United  States.  The  official 
export  statistics  of  this  country  show  a  decline  during  the  decade 
from  1895  to  1905  in  the  exports  of  packing-house  products  to  France 
from  §4,700,000  to  §1,500,000.  In  other  words,  this  line  of  trade  is 
in  value  less  than  one-third  of  its  magnitude  ten  years  ago. 

MEAT    PROHIBITIONS    OF    GERMANY. 

Largely  because  of  the  constantly  increasing  sales  of  American 
lard  in  Germany,  the  exports  of  American  packing-house  products  to 
that  country  show  a  continuous  increase  since  1SS5.  In  that  year 
$5,700,000  worth  of  these  products  was  shipped  to  Germany;  in  1895, 
$13,800,000  worth;  in  1905,  $21,900,000.  Lard  alone,  however,  consti- 
tutes over  two-thirds  of  the  aggregate  value  of  this  trade  and  accounts 
for  over  810,000,000  of  the  total  increase  of  816,000,000  in  the  twenty 
years.  It  must  be  borne  in  mind,  moreover,  that  the  low  figure  in 
1885  was  reached  while  the  prohibition  against  pork  was  in  full  force, 
and  the  subsequent  increase  is  undoubtedly  due  in  part  to  the  with- 
drawal of  that  prohibition  in  1891.  The  importation  of  cattle  into 
Germany  has  been  totally  prohibited  since  1894,  while  the  importa- 
tion of  other  kinds  of  meat  animals  is  subject  to  four  weeks'  quaran- 
tine, together  with  subsequent  supervision  on  the  part  of  the  Govern- 
ment for  five  months,  if  not  slaughtered.  Xo  meat  animals  whatever 
have  reached  Germany  from  the  U/nited  States  since  1900,  and  only 
ten  during  the  preceding  six  years. 

The  restrictions  upon  the  importation  of  meat  are  much  more 
important  than  those  affecting  the  importation  of  animals.  A  general 
prohibition  is  in  force  since  the  passage  of  the  meat  inspection  law  of 
1900  in  regard  to  the  importation  of  canned  meat  and  sausages  from 
all  countries.  Dog  meat  and  prepared  horse  meat  are  entirely 
excluded,  while  fresh  horse  meat  may  be  imported  only  when  clearly 
marked  "Pferdefleisch"  (horse  flesh). 

While  these  provisions  apply  to  all  countries,  the  prohibition  of 
canned  meat  and  sausages  affects  particularly  imports  from  the  United 
States.  In  1900,  prior  to  October  1,  when  these  prohibitions  went  into 
effect,  the  United  States  alone  furnished  nearly  81,600,000  worth  of 
these  products  out  of  a  total  of  only  $2,200,000.  Other  restrictions 
affect  only  meat  imported  from  the  United  States.  In  addition  to  the 
total  exclusion  of  fresh  beef  from  America  since  1894,  the  importation 
of  pork  of  all  kinds  is  permitted  only  on  presentation  of  a  certificate 
of  inspection. 


25-1  YEARBOOK    OP    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

ITALT   AI  :.ICAX    FORS    AND    LARD. 

The  ministerial  decree  of  March  31.  etermines  the  treatment 

to  be  accorded  to  imports  of  foreign  animals  and  animal  products. 
The  entry  of  cattle  and  sheep  from  South  Africa.  Australia,  and  cer- 
tain European  countries  is  prohibited,  but  not  from  Argentina  or  the 
United  States.  Swine  from  the  United  States.  Turkey.  Cyprus,  Egypt, 
Aa-Herzegovina.  Crete,  and  Denmark  are  prohibited,  but  salted 
cured  pork,  while  excluded  generally.  tedfrom 

United   States    and   from   specified    European    countries    when 
accompanied  by  official  certificates.     In  all  ■  a  arrival  in  Italy 

imports  must  undergo  inspection,  and,  with  the  exception  of  lard  from 
the  United  S  tes  and  certain  European  countries,  they  must  be 
accompanied  by  an  official  certificate. 

PROHIBITION"    .  HE    N'ETH: 

Meat  animals  from  France.  -  :     m  Belgium, 

and  cattle  and  sheep  fr<  i  /.any.  may  be  imported  for  bree 

purposes  if  accompanied  by  a  certificate  of  health:  otherwise  such 
animals  must  under _  .-in  twenty-four  hours  if  imported 

France  or  Belgium,  and  within  foi  hours  if  from  Ger- 

No  :  .imais  may  be  imported  from  any  other  country 

unless  under  special  ministerial  permit. 

The  importation  of  meat  into  the  Netherlands  is  nominally  pro- 
hibited, but  if  shown  not  to  be  injurious  in  character  it  may  be  im- 
ported under  special  dispensation  of  the  authorities  in  the  different 
provinces.  Apparently  meat  and  other  animal  products  enter  the 
Netherlands  freely  and  no  doubt  this  form  of  regulation  was  adopted 
merely  to  retain  full  coni  or  the  character  of  imports. 

NORWAY 

Only  two  lines  of  trade  in  live  meat  animals  are  unimpeded:  (1)  The 
importation  of  reindeer,  and  (2)  the  shipment  of  all  meat  animals 
from  the  Arctic   Sea   ports   of  Eu-  rinmarken,   the  extreme 

northern  province  of  Norway,  from  which  province  animals  will  at 
received  into  other  parts  of  the  Kingdom.     From  Sweden  rumin 
maybe  imported  under  numerous  restrictions:   from  other  countries 
neither  ruminants  nor  swine  are  admitted.. 

The  im  -      alted  or  prepared,  and  of  unren- 

dered  ta  rohibited  from  A  Italy.  Greece.  Turkey.  Russia 

(except  the  Arctic  ports  when  destined  to  Finmarken  .  and  all  : 
European  countries.     Raw  animal  products,  except  hides  and  skins 
from  Sweden,  are  generally  prohibited. 


FOREIGN    RESTRICTIONS    OX    AMERICAN    MEAT.  255 


RUSSIA    PROHIBITS    FORK. 


Russia  is  essentially  an  agricultural  country,  and  exports  much. 
larger  quantities  of  animals  and  animal  products  than  it  imports. 
Since  1873  all  lands  of  pork  products  intended  for  food  have  been 
prohibited,  with  the  exception  of  rendered  lard.  Under  special  per- 
mission of  the  minister  of  agriculture  and  domains,  samples  of  foreign 
hog  products  are  admitted  when  necessary  to  enable  Russian  export- 
ers to  compete.  The  ministry  of  the  interior  is  authorized  to  prohibit 
the  importation  of  live  swine  whenever  it  seems  necessary. 


FEW    RESTRICTIONS    IX    SPAIN". 


The  prohibitions  of  Spain  affecting  meat  animals  and  meat  are  few 
in  number.  From  the  United  States  unrendered  lard  alone  is  prohib- 
ited, and  from  Algeria  the  importation  of  swine  and  sausages  is  like- 
wise prohibited.  Pork  imported  from  the  United  States  with  an  offi- 
cial certificate  of  inspection  is  admitted  into  Spain  without  any 
further  microscopic  examination. 

SWEDEN"     EXCLUDES    AMERICAN"    SWINE    PRODUCTS. 

In  Sweden  animals  and  raw  animal  products  from  a  place  infected 
with  foot-and-mouth  disease  or  rinderpest  are  entirely  prohibited,  as 
well  as  such  imports  if  in  transit  they  have  touched  or  passed  through 
infected  places.  In  the  case  of  ruminants  imported  from  places  infected 
with  other  contagious  diseases,  a  consular  certificate  and  a  veterinary 
certificate  are  required,  and  on  arrival  at  a  Swedish  port  the  animals 
must  be  reinspectcd  and  quarantined  for  periods  varying  from  10  to 
120  days.  These  restrictions  are  not  enforced  against  the  United 
States,  because  this  country  has  not  been  declared  by  the  Swedish 
Government  to  be  infected  with  any  of  the  diseases  named. 

Swine  and  swine  products  from  the  United  States  are,  however, 
subjected  to  stringent  restrictions,  owing  to  the  fact  that  the  govern- 
ment of  Sweden  has  declared  the  United  States,  as  well  as  Victoria 
and  the  principal  countries  of  Europe,  to  be  infected  with  hog  cholera. 
Live  swine  may  be  imported  only  if  accompanied  by  a  veterinary 
certificate  viseed  by  a  Swedish  consul,  stating  that  before  sailing  all 
animals  on  board  have  been  inspected  and  found  free  from  disease, 
and  on  arrival  must  be  reinspected  and  quarantined  for  60  days. 
Slaughtered  swine  and  all  swine  products  are  also  prohibited,  with 
the  exception  of  lard  and  well-salted  pork,  including  bacon. 

SWITZERLAND    REQUIRES    IMMEDIATE    SLAUGHTER. 

The  situation  of  Switzerland,  with  no  seaport,  renders  impossible 
direct  importation  from  any  countries  except  France,  Germany,  Aus- 
tria, and  Italy.  Its  restrictions  and  prohibitions  are  consequently 
directed  primarily  to  animals  coming  from  any  of  these  countries. 


256  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Immediate  slaughter,  within  periods  varying  to  some  extent  in  the 
different  Cantons,  is  required.  In  all  cases  the  animals  and  meat 
imported  undergo  inspection. 

GREAT    BRITAIN    OFFERS    AX    OPEX    MARKET. 

Since  June  3,  1898,  the  importation  of  swine  from  the  United  States 
into  Great  Britain  has  been  prohibited,  but  no  exclusion  of  other  meat 
animals  has  been  enforced,  except  during  the  period  from  December 
1,  1902,  to  September  28,  1903,  when  the  importation  of  such  animals 
from  the  New  England  States  was  temporarily  suspended. 

Strong  efforts  have  been  made  by  this  Government  to  have  revoked 
the  requirement  that  cattle  shall  be  slaughtered  at  the  port  of  entry 
within  ten  days  after  landing.  While  this  restriction  entirely  pre- 
vents the  importation  of  cattle  for  fattening,  and  undoubtedly  pre- 
vents the  realization  of  the  best  prices  for  the  animals  imported,  it 
offers  no  discrimination  against  the  United  States  as  compared  with 
any  other  foreign  country  or  any  British  colony. 

The  United  States  now  furnishes  74  per  cent  of  the  total  value  of 
live  meat  animals  imported  into  the  United  Kingdom;  ten  years  ago 
it  contributed  only  63  per  cent.  The  change  is  due  largely  to  the 
prohibition  of  live  animals  from  Argentina  and  Uruguay  since  1900, 
except  for  the  period  from  February  3  to  May  12.  1903,  when  the 
British  market  was  reopened  to  La  Plate  cattle.  Xo  restrictive 
measures  affect  the  importation  of  meat,  and  Argentina  and  Uruguay 
now  furnish  large  quantities  of  frozen  beef  and  mutton  for  British 
consumption.  The  fresh  beef  alone  imported  into  the  United  King- 
dom from  Argentina  in  1904  was  valued  at  nearly  twice  as  high  a 
figure  as  the  cattle  imported  in  any  year  before  the  restrictions  of  1900 
went  into  effect. 

The  continued  large  shipments  of  cattle  from  the  United  States  is 
a  striking  feature  of  the  trade  between  these  two  countries.  During 
the  ten  years  ending  1904  such  shipments  increased  in  quantity  32  per 
cent,  while  the  imports  of  fresh  beef  from  the  United  States  increased 
45  per  cent.  The  continued  importation  of  live  cattle  in  such  large 
numbers,  notwithstanding  the  great  improvement  that  has  taken 
place  in  refrigeration  and  the  enormous  packing-house  industry  of  the 
United  States,  is  probably  due  mainly  to  the  strong  preference  of  the 
British  consumer  for  domestic  meat.  If  home-grown  meat  can  not 
be  obtained,  home-killed  meat  is  preferred  to  foreign-killed,  and  this 
preference  is  doubtless  rendered  more  possible  of  realization,  owing 
to  the  stringent  laws  prohibiting  the  sale  of  food  products  under  any 
misleading  designation.  A  number  of  prosecutions  have  taken  place 
on  account  of  the  sale  of  foreign  for  domestic  bacon. 

The  importation  of  meat  animals  into  Ireland  from  foreign  coun- 
tries or  British  possessions  is  prohibited. 


FOREIGN    RESTRICTIONS    ON    AMERICAN    MEAT.  257 

FEW    RESTRICTIONS    IMPOSED    BY    XOXEUROPEAN    COUNTRIES. 

Outside  of  Europe,  the  most  important  exports  of  live  stock  and 
packing-house  products  from  the  United  States  take  place  to  Cuba, 
Canada,  Mexico,  and  the  British  West  Indies.  During  the  fiscal  year 
1905  large  shipments  of  canned  beef  were  recorded  to  Japan,  but  with 
the  cessation  of  the  war  in  the  Far  East  a  considerable  decline  occurred 
in  1906.  Of  the  American  markets  named,  Canada  alone  restricts 
seriously  the  imports  from  the  United  States  by  requiring,  since 
December  31,  1905,  the  quarantine  of  all  swine  for  thirty  da}^s,  thus 
cutting  off  the  entry  of  United  States  hogs  for  slaughter." 

Cuba  not  only  offers  no  impediments  to  the  importation  of  liye 
stock  and  packing-house  products  from  the  United  States,  but  by 
special  reduction  in  tariff  offers  United  States  animals  and  products 
a  considerable  advantage  over  those  from  other  countries.  This 
advantage  amounts  to  33  cents  per  100  pounds  on  salted  or  pickled 
pork  and  lard  and  to  65  cents  per  100  pounds  on  hams  and  shoulders. 

SUMMARY    OF   PROHIBITIONS    NOW    IN    FORCE. 

At  the  present  time  the  importation  of  live  meat  animals  from 
the  United  States  is  prohibited  by  Denmark,  the  Netherlands,  Nor- 
way, and  Ireland.  Moreover,  Austria-Hungary,  France,  and  Ger- 
many exclude  cattle,  Italy  and  Great  Britain  swine,  and  Austria- 
Hungary  sheep  and  goats,  when  imported  from  the  United  States. 
The  only  European  countries  to  which  live  stock  are  shipped  from 
the  United  States  in  any  considerable  number  are  Great  Britain  and 
Belgium. 

The  importation  from  the  United  States  of  all  meat,  except  pork 
and  sausages,  is  prohibited  by  Austria-Hungary.  Pork  is  excluded 
from  Russia.  Norway  prohibits  the  importation  of  all  fresh  meal 
from  the  United  States;  fresh  pork  is  excluded  from  Sweden  and 
other  fresh  meat  from  Denmark;  while  Germany  excludes  American 
fresh  beef.  Canned  meat,  sausages,  cured  horse  meat,  and  dog  meat 
are  prohibited  by  Germany,  while  Belgium  also  refuses  to  admit 
cured  horse  meat. 

SPECIAL    REGULATIONS. 

In  addition  to  orders  which  absolutely  prohibit  the  importation 
of  live  stock  and  meat  from  the  United  States,  many  countries  restrict 
in  various  ways  these  lines  of  trade. 

In  regard  to  the  trade  in  live  animals,  enforced  quarantine  is  required 
in  some  cases,  while  in  others  the  contrary  policy  of  enforced 
slaughter  is  observed.     The  former  imposes  a  considerable  expense 

ee  Monthly  Cons.  Repts.,  Jan.,  190G,  p.  166;  also  Report  of  Canadian  Min.  of  Agr.. 
1906,  p.  xli. 

3    A1906 17 


25S  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEFABTXTEXT    OF    AGBICULTTJEE. 

on  the  importer,  while  the  latter,  by  limiting  the  opportunity  for 
sale  and  in  some  cases  preventing  the  animals  from  fully  recovering 
from  the  exhaustion  of  the  sea  voyage,  operates  clis advantageously 
upon  the  price  realized. 

Restrictions  affecting  both  live-stock  and  meat  imports  are  the 
requirement  of  a  certificate,  inspection  on  arrival,  and  the  limitation  of 
the  ports  at  which  such  imports  are  admitted. 

If  fresh  meat  is  imported,  some  countries  require  that  the  whole 
carcass  be  presented.  A  few  countries  specify  the  preservatives  that 
may  be  used. 

QUARANTINE    RESTRICTIONS. 

Live  stock  from  the  United  States  is  subject  to  quarantine  in 
Sweden.  Germany.  Spain,  and  Canada.  Swine  imported  into  Sweden 
from  all  countries  except  Finland  and  Xorway  must  undergo  quar- 
antine for  sixty  days:  Germany  requires  the  detention  of  swine, 
sheep,  and  goats  from  America  for  a  period  of  four  weeks:  Spain 
requires  a  quarantine  of  ten  days  before  animals  are  admitted;  Canada 
isolates  all  swine  for  thirty  days. 

IMMEDIATE    SLAUGHTER    REQUIRED. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  United  Kingdom.  Belgium,  and  the  Neth- 
erlands aim  to  prevent  any  possible  danger  to  domestic  animals 
bv  requiring  the  immediate  slaughter  of  the  live  stock  imported. 
The  United  Kingdom,  since  ISTO.has  required  that  cattle,  sheep,  and 
swine  imported  from  the  United  States  shall  be  slaughtered  at  the 
port  at  which  they  are  landed.  This  requirement  is  now  general 
in  its  application,  and  meat  animals,  no  matter  from  what  country 
imported,  must  be  slaughtered  within  ten  days  from  their  arrival 
without  coming  in  contact  with  any  British  animals.  Belgium 
requires  the  slaughter  of  all  animals  imported  from  across  the  sea 
within  three  days.  The  Netherlands  imposes  the  requirement  of 
slaughter  within  twentv-four  or  fortv-eight  hours  in  the  case  of 
such  animals  as  are  admitted,  but  live  meat  animals  from  the  United 
States  are  totally  excluded. 

PRESENTATION    OF   CERTIFICATES. 

The  presentation  of  a  health  certificate  is  a  prerequisite  to  the 
admission  of  live  stock  into  Austria.  France.  Italy,  the  Netherlands, 
Mexico,  and  Cuba,  while  Mexico  also  requires  a  health  certificate 
in  the  case  of  fresh  meat  imported,  and  Austria  and  Italy  in  the  case 
of  all  kinds  of  meat.  Sweden  requires  a  certificate  only  when  the 
animals  are  imported  from  countries  infected  with  contagious  dis- 
eases, in  order  to  ascertain  that  the  animals  imported  have  not 
been  directly  exposed  to  contagion.  Canada  requires  the  presen- 
tation of  a  health  certificate  in  the  case  of  swine. 


FOREIGX    RESTRICTIONS    OX    AMERICAN    MEAT.  259 

In  some  special  cases  the  admission  of  swine  and  swine  products 
from  the  United  States  is  made  dependent  on  the  presentation  of 
an  official  certificate  from  the  Department  of  Agriculture.  Austria 
requires  such  a  certificate  on  the  importation  of  swine,  pork  (includ- 
ing bacon),  and  sausage;  France  in  the  case  of  cured  pork;  Denmark 
in  the  case  of  fresh  pork,  bladders,  and  unpurified  steam  lard,  and 
Spain  and  Germany  in  the  case  of  all  kinds  of  pork. 

INSPECTION    OX    ARRIVAL. 

Inspection  of  imported  live  animals  is  generally  required.  France 
and  Mexico,  moreover,  require  the  inspection  of  all  fresh  meat  im- 
ported; Germany,  Switzerland,  and  Belgium  the  inspection  of  all 
kinds  of  meat,  and  Italy  the  inspection  of  all  animal  products. 
France  provides  especially  for  the  inspection  of  cured  pork  and 
sausages  from  the  United  States,  notwithstanding  the  fact  that  the 
first  of  these  products  must  in  all  cases  be  accompanied  by  a  United 
States  certificate  of  inspection.  On  the  importation  of  cattle,  with 
the  exception  of  those  for  immediate  slaughter,  the  tuberculin  test 
is  required  by  France  and  Denmark. 

FEES    IMPOSED. 

In  most  cases  fees  a  are  charged  for  inspection,  which  constitute  a 
very  considerable  factor  in  raising  the  price  at  which  the  product  may 
be  sold.  These  fees  differ  widely  in  amount.  In  addition  to  the 
ordinary  fees,  a  special  charge  is  imposed  in  Germany  for  an  exam- 
ination to  discover  the  presence  of  trichime,  to  determine  whether  a 
shipment  is  horse  meat,  or  to  ascertain  the  presence  of  forbidden 
preservatives.  The  inspection  required  by  France  on  salt  pork  when 
imported  from  the  United  States,  but  not  from  other  countries, 
entails  a  charge  of  13  cents  per  100  pounds.  For  the  special  inspec- 
tion required  in  the  case  of  sausages  from  the  United  States,  however, 
no  fee  is  charged. 

PORTS    OF    EXTRY    LIMITED. 

European  countries  in  most  cases  restrict  the  importation  of  live 
stock,  and  in  some  cases  also  the  importation  of  meat  to  certain  ports 
in  order  apparently  to  facilitate  inspection.  This  requirement  is 
general  in  its  application  by  the  United  Kingdom,  Denmark,  Swe- 
den, Germany,  and  Spain.  Belgium,  however,  limits  more  strictly 
the  importation  from  trans-Atlantic  countries  than  from  European 

a Fee  for  imported  cattle,  per  head  (cents):  Belgium,  19  to 39;  France,  10  to  29;  Italy, 
39.     For  imported  meat,  per  100  pounds  (cents):  Belgium,  2;  France,  9;  Italy.  IS. 

In  Germany  ices  on  live  stock  are  of  local  or  State  origin,  and  differ  widely.  For 
fresh  meat,  per  carcass  (cents):  Cattle,  3G;  calf.  12;  swine.  14;  sheep  or  goat,  10.  For 
prepared  meat,  per  100  pounds  i  cents):  Sausage  casings,  5;  bacon,  11;  other,  22.  These 
rates  superseded  on  February  15,  1907,  the  higher  rates  previously  in  force. 


260  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

countries.  France  restricts  the  importation  of  cured  pork  from  the 
United  States  (which  alone  is  compelled  to  undergo  inspection  on 
arrival)  to  six  ports — Dunkirk.  Havre.  Bordeaux,  Marseille.  Boulogne, 
and  Dieppe.  A  larger  number  of  ports  are  specified  for  the  importa- 
tion of  cattle  which  must  be  subjected  to  the  tuberculin  test,  w 
other  animals  may  be  entered  at  a  still  larger  number  of  custom- 
houses. 

CARCASSES    OR    SPECIFIED    CUTS. 

Belgium.  Franco,  and  Germany  prescribe  minutely  the  form  in 
which  fresh  meat  may  be  imported.  In  Belgium  such  meat  may  be 
imported  only  as  whole  carcasses,  halves,  or  forequarters  with  the 
lungs  attached.  As  to  horses  and  other  solipeds,  all  the  breathing 
organs,  including  the  head,  must  be  present.  France  requires  in  the 
case  of  fresh  beef  and  pork  that  the  whole  animal  be  presented.  For 
convenience  of  shipping,  the  carcass  may  be  halved  or  quartered,  but 
in  these  cases  the  parts  must  fit  exactly  and  the  lungs  must  adhere 
naturally.  Internal  organs  must  show  no  trace  of  scraping  or  scratch- 
ing. Choice  cuts  of  beef,  such  as  the  tenderloin  or  sirloin,  may  be 
admitted  separately.  Fresh  mutton  may  be  imported  only  in  quar- 
ters, the  pluck  adhering  to  one  of  the  forequarters. 

Germany  requires  that  fresh  meat  of  all  kinds  shall  be  imported 
only  in  whole  carcasses,  but  carcasses  of  cattle  (with  the  exception 
of  calves)  and  of  swine  may  be  cut  into  halves.  The  pleura  and  the 
peritoneum,  the  lungs,  the  heart,  the  kidneys,  and  in  case  of  cows  the 
udder,  also  must  be  attached  to  the  carcass  in  natural  connection. 
The  importation  of  salted  meat  in  pieces  weighing  less  than  9  pounds 
(4  kilograms)  is  prohibited,  but  this  requirement  does  not  apply  to 
hams,  bacon,  and  sausage  casings. 

RESTRICTIONS    OX    THE    USE    OF    PRESERVATIVES. 

In  the  United  States,  under  the  meat-inspection  law  approved 
June  30.  1906,  the  use  of  drugs,  chemical-,  dye-,  ami  preservatives  is 
restricted  much  more  stringently  than  in  most  foreign  countries. 
The  regulations  issued  by  the  Department  of  Agriculture  under  that 
law  prohibit  entirely  in  the  preparation  of  meat  products  the  use  of 
any  drug,  chemical,  or  dye,  and  of  any  preservative  other  than  com- 
mon salt,  sugar,  wood  smoke,  vinegar,  pure  spices,  and  temporarily 
saltpeter. 

The  requirement  in  regard  to  the  use  of  drugs,  chemicals,  and 
dyes  affects  export  products  equally  with  those  intended  for  domestic 
consumption.  In  regard  to  preservatives,  a  slightly  wider  range  is 
permitted  in  the  preparation  of  products  for  export  to  countries  in 
which  the  requirements  are  less  strict  than  those  in  force  here.  To 
this  end  the  law  of  June  30,  1906,  provides — 

That,  subject  to  the  rules  and  regulation;  of  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture,  the  pro- 
visions hereof  in  regard  to  preservatives  shall  not  apply  to  meat  food  products  lor  ■  : 


FOREIGN    RESTRICTIONS    ON    AMERICAN    MEAT.  261 

to  any  foreign  country  and  which  arc  prepared  or  packed  according  to  the  specifi- 
cations or  directions  of  the  foreign  purchaser,  when  no  substance  is  used  in  the  prepa- 
ration or  packing  thereof  in  conflict  with  the  laws  of  the  foreign  country  to  which  said 
article  is  to  be  exported. 

The  United  Kingdom,  Austria,  Italy,  and  Denmark  prohibit  in 
general  terms  the  use  of  any  ingredient  that  is  injurious  to  public 
health,  but  do  not  prohibit  any  specific  preservatives.  The  United 
Kingdom  expressly  provides  that  food  products  may  contain  pre- 
servative or  coloring  substances,  provided  that  they  are  not  used 
in  such  quantities  as  to  render  the  article  dangerous  to  health.  Italy 
similarly  provides  that  the  addition  of  a  noninjurious  substance 
which  is  necessary  to  fit  the  article  for  sale  or  transportation  shall 
not  be  deemed  an  adulteration.  France  prohibits  adulterations  in 
general,  and  specifically  the  use  of  salicylic  acid  and  formaldehyde. 
Cuba  by  a  recent  law  prohibits  the  use  of  all  preservatives  for  meat 
except  common  salt.  Germany  and  Belgium,  instead  of  a  general 
prohibition,  name  the  preservatives  the  use  of  which  is  prohibited. 
These  are  in  Germany  formaldehyde,  alkali  and  alkaline  earth 
hydroxides  and  carbonates,  boracic,  salicylic,  hydrofluoric,  and  sul- 
phurous acids,  hyposulphites,  and  chlorates.  In  Belgium  the  pro- 
hibited substances  are  salicylic  acid,  formaldehyde,  sulphurous  acid, 
sulphites  or  bisulphites,  antiseptics,  and  in  general  substances  injuri- 
ous to  health.  It  is  to  be  observed  that  the  greatest  latitude  is 
permitted  in  countries  such  as  the  United  Kingdom,  which  are  com- 
pelled to  depend  for  an  import  ant  part  of  their  food  supply  on  products 
carried  long  distances. 

TREATY    LIMITATIONS. 

It  is  universally  admitted  that  sanitary  considerations  necessitate 
at  times  the  exclusion  or  restriction  of  imports  from  certain  regions. 
It  is  not  this  principle,  but  what  are  deemed  unjust  applications  of 
it,  that  have  called  forth  protests  in  the  past.  A  treaty  provision 
guaranteeing  that  no  prohibition  shall  be  applied  to  imports  from 
any  one  country  unless  made  applicable  to  imports  from  all  countries, 
such  as  is  contained  in  the  treaties  of  the  United  States  with  Austria- 
Hungary,  Prussia,  and  other  European  countries,  necessarily  requires 
qualifications  when  actual  sanitary  reasons  exist.  Yet  in  the  guise 
of  sanitary  needs  there  is  undoubtedly  a  temptation  to  extend  the 
requirements  of  this  kind  in  such  a  way  as  to  constitute  unjust  dis- 
crimination. More  precise  definition  of  the  obligation  imposed  in 
this  respect  by  the  treaty  guarantee  of  most-favored-nation  privi- 
leges is  urgently  needed  to  safeguard  a  country  against  unfair  treat- 
ment. An  unqualified  guarantee  that  no  prohibition  shall  be  directed 
against  the  products  of  an  individual  country  is  far  less  effective  than 
a  careful  definition  of  the  rights  retained  by  each. 


262  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

The  recent  treaties  entered  into  between  Germany  and  various 
European  countries  have  clearly  stated,  in  the  form  of  an  exception 
to  the  most-favored-nation  clause,  the  right  to  prescribe  the  sanitary 
measures  necessary  "to  protect  animals  or  useful  plants  against  dis- 
ease or  injurious  insects  or  parasites."  But,  on  the  other  hand, 
this  right  is  qualified  by  the  proviso  that  such  restrictions  •'shall 
apply  to  all  countries  or  to  those  countries  in  the  same  condition" 
in  regard  to  the  prevalence  of  disease  and  measures  for  its  control. 

In  presenting  the  treaties  to  the  Reichstag  for  ratification,  the 
imperial  chancellor  emphasized  the  advantages  gained  in  regard  to 
the  establishment  of  sanitary  measures.  Under  the  former  vet- 
erinary treaty  with  Austria-Hungary,  except  in  the  case  of  rinder- 
pest and  contagious  pleuro-pneumonia.  Germany  could  not  prohibit 
the  importation  of  Austrian  cattle  unless  a  contagious  disease  within 
its  own  borders  had  actually  resulted  from  such  importation.  Under 
the  new  treaty,  prohibitions  may  be  imposed  whenever  a  contagious 
disease  is  conveyed  from  one  country  to  the  other,  or  whenever  such 
a  disease  is  prevalent  in  one  of  the  countries,  but  in  the  case  of  most 
diseases  (not  including  rinderpest  or  foot-and-mouth  disease)  may 
be  directed  only  against  the  particular  district  affected,  and  not  the 
whole  country.  The  prohibitions  may  in  no  case  be  maintained  more 
than  nine  months  after  the  end  of  the  infection  as  officially  declared. 
The  importation  of  cattle  and  sheep  for  immediate  slaughter  in  public 
abattoirs  may  be  prohibited  only  on  account  of  the  more  virulent 
diseases,  such  as  foot-and-mouth  disease.  Such  prohibitions  shall 
apply  only  to  the  particular  districts  affected,  and  must  be  withdrawn 
within  thirty  days  after  the  districts  have  been  officially  declared 
free  from  the  contagion.  Owing  to  the  division  of  Austria-Hungary 
and  Germany  into  small  districts  in  regard  to  contagious  diseases,  the 
burden  involved  in  temporary  prohibitions  is  vastly  decreased,  with 
no  decrease  in  the  efficacy  of  the  measure. 

With  other  countries,  however,  Germany  retains  much  fuller  liberty 
of  action  with  regard  to  sanitary  prohibitions.  By  treaty  with 
Russia.  Germany  guarantees  that  imports  from  that  country  shall 
not  be  subjected  to  stricter  veterinary  measures  than  are  taken 
against  other  countries,  which,  in  regard  to  the  prevalence  of  con- 
tagious diseases  and  in  regard  to  veterinary  control,  are  in  the  same 
situation  as  Russia.  While  Germany  maintains  a  nominal  prohibition 
against  the  importation  of  hogs  from  Russia  and  Austria,  a  special 
exemption  is  granted  by  which  SO. 000  animals  may  be  imported 
annually  from  Austria-Hungary  and  130,000  animals  from  Russia. 

DISCRIMINATING    TARIFFS. 

As  a  rule  the  tariff  rates  imposed  do  not  discriminate  against  the 
United  States.  At  the  present  time  no  country  of  Europe,  except 
France,  imposes  on  any  United  States  product  higher  rates  than 


FOREIGN    RESTRICTIONS    ON"    AMERICAN    MEAT.  263 

those  applicable  to  the  products  of  its  most  highly  favored  com- 
petitor. Even  in  the  case  of  France,  the  benefit  of  the  lowest  tariff 
rate  is  accorded  to  the  United  States  on  several  of  its  leading  packing- 
house products. 

The  commercial  agreement  of  1898  with  France  specified  as  among 
the  products  of  the  United  States  which  would  be  admitted  at  the 
minimum  rates  canned  meats,  sausages  and  assimilated  products, 
and  lard.  At  that  time  a  uniform  duty  was  imposed  on  imports  of 
meat  animals  and  of  fresh  and  salted  meat  of  all  kinds,  with  the 
exception  of  salted  beef  and  mutton,  on  which  the  minimum  rate  of 
duty  was  very  slightly  below  the  general  rate.  The  general  rate  of 
duty,  which  was  imposed  on  this  product  when  imported  from  the 
United  States,  was  $2.63  per  100  pounds,  while  the  rate  imposed 
under  the  minimum  tariff  was  $2.37  per  100  pounds.  With  the  excep- 
tion of  this  item  and  one  or  two  others  of  merely  nominal  importance 
in  our  trade,  the  United  States  was  put  on  an  equality  with  its  com- 
petitors on  the  French  market  in  respect  to  live  meat  animals  and 
packing-house  products. 

On  July  31,  1903,  a  new  law  was  passed  by  which  the  duties  on 
cattle,  sheep,  goats,  and  swine,  and  on  fresh  and  salted  meat,  were 
largely  increased,  while  a  minimum  tariff  rate  was  enacted  but  little 
in  excess  of  the  rate  previously  in  force.  In  consequence  of  this 
change,  United  States  meat  was  placed  at  a  great  competitive  dis- 
advantage, varying  from  $1.31  to  $2.75  per  100  pounds. 

The  year  1906  witnessed  the  withdrawal  of  discriminating  duties 
by  two  European  countries.  Beginning  January  1 , 1 906,  United  States 
products  were  admitted  into  Switzerland  at  the  lowest  rates  of  duty 
and  on  September  1,  1906,  the  same  treatment  was  first  accorded  by 
Spain. 

The  high  level  to  which  import  duties  on  live  stock  and  meat 
have  been  carried  is  also  a  factor  of  considerable  importance.  Dur- 
ing the  year  1906  no  less  than  twelve  new  tariffs  were  put  into  effect 
by  European  countries.  Three  of  these — the  tariffs  of  Belgium, 
France,  and  Sweden — while  issued  in  the  form  of  new  tariffs,  repre- 
sented in  fact  merely  a  complete  revision  of  the  tariffs  already  in  force; 
two  more,  the  Italian  and  Russian,  left  the  rates  on  live  stock  and 
packing-house  products  practically  unchanged;  while  seven — the  tar- 
iffs of  Austria-Hungary,  Bulgaria,  Germany,  Roumania,  Servia,  Spain, 
and  Switzerland — increased  those  duties  very  materially. 

FUTURE  PROSPECTS  OF  TRADE  EXPANSION. 

The  present-  study  discloses  some  discouraging  features.  Cattle 
and  meat  from  the  farms  and  packing  houses  of  the  United  States  arc 
placed  at  a  great  disadvantage  by  the  prohibitive  and  restrictive 
decrees  of  Germany,  Austria-Hungary,  and  Denmark,  and  by  the 
differential  tariff  duties  of  France. 


264  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

But  there  are  also  features  of  a  peculiarly  favorable  character. 
The  great  meat  market  of  Europe,  that  of  the  United  Kingdom,  is 
open  wide  for  the  admission  of  American  meat,  and  places  American 
cattle  and  sheep  on  a  footing  as  favorable  as  that  enjoyed  by  any 
other  dountry  or  by  any  British  colony,  and  more  favorable  than 
that  applied  in  the  case  of  many  of  our  chief  competitors. 

The  advantage  gained  by  the  United  States  in  obtaining  for  its 
products  admission  into  Switzerland  and  Spain  at  the  lowest  rates  of 
duty  will  undoubtedly  prove  of  value  to  the  meat  exporters  of  this 
country. 

It  was  predicted  in  some  quarters  that  the  complaints  made  during 
the  first  six  months  of  1906  in  regard  to  the  methods  employed  by 
some  packing  houses  in  the  United  States  would  result  in  a  serious 
decline  in  our  meat  exports  and  in  further  exclusion  of  such  products 
from  foreign  countries.  Fortunately  the  first  part  of  the  prediction 
has  not  been  realized  and  the  second  part  only  in  a  small  measure. 
The  exports  of  meat  and  meat  products  from  the  United  States  show 
an  increase  in  the  calendar  year  1906  aggregating  $15,000,000  over 
the  value  for  the  preceding  year.  The  only  product  showing  a 
noticeable  decrease  is  canned  meat,  of  which  large  quantities  were 
exported  in  1905  to  Japan  for  use  as  an  army  ration.  Except  in  the 
case  of  Austria-Hungary,  moreover,  no  new  restriction  was  decreed 
affecting  meat  imported  from  the  United  States.  The  trade  with 
Austria-Hungary  in  meats  other  than  pork  (which  was  not  affected  by 
the  decree)  was  already  small,  amounting  to  only  883,000  in  the  year 
ending  June  30,  1906,  and  less  than  822,000  the  preceding  year.  The 
actual  effect  will  therefore  be  much  less  injurious  than  would  be  antic- 
ipated from  the  general  terms  of  the  decree,  but  its  potential  effect  in 
preventing  any  future  expansion  is  far  more  serious. 

Instead  of  leading  to  increased  restriction  on  American  products, 
the  events  of  1906  really  afford  an  excellent  reason  for  the  removal 
or  modification  of  the  restrictions  that  in  the  past  have  exercised  so 
injurious  an  effect  on  the  trade  in  meat  and  live  animals.  The  exten- 
sion of  the  powers  of  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  in  1891  over  the 
inspection  of  exported  meat  led  to  a  considerable  relaxation  of  the 
restrictions  against  American  swine  products.  There  is  no  reason  why 
the  stricter  control  now  exercised  over  all  processes  of  slaughtering 
and  preparation  of  meat  should  not  induce  the  leading  foreign  govern- 
ments to  modify  the  more  serious  restrictions  and  admit  American 
meat  on  freer  terms.  Such  action  is  more  feasible  because  treaty 
relations  among  European  countries  are  still  undergoing  revision,  and 
within  many  of  those  countries  a  strong  demand  has  sprung  up  for 
the  freer  admission  of  foreign  cattle  and  meat. 


METHODS  OF  REDUCING  THE  COST  OF  PRODUCING 
BEET  SUGAR. 

By  C.  0.  Townsend, 
Pathologist  in  Charge  of  Sugar-Beet  Investigations,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

INTRODUCTION. 

The  first  refined  beet-root  sugar  produced  in  commercial  quantity 
was  made  about  one  hundred  years  ago,  at  a  cost  of  approximately  SO 
cents  a  pound.  The  cost  of  producing  cane  sugar  was  then  somewhat 
higher  than  that  of  beet  sugar.  The  amount  of  raw  sugar  extracted 
from  the  beet  at  that  time  varied  from  4  to  0  per  cent,  and  the  amount 
of  refined  sugar  obtained  was  from  1  to  2  per  cent  of  the  weight  of  the 
beet.  The  cost  of  producing  an  acre  of  beets  was  estimated  at  approx- 
imately $35,  while  the  yield  was  from  6  to  25  tons  per  acre.  When 
it  is  considered  that  upward  of  15  pounds  of  refined  sugar  can  be 
obtained  at  retail  to-day  for  the  original  cost  of  manufacturing  1  pound 
of  beet  sugar  it  must  be  realized  that  many  improvements  have  already 
been  made  in  the  quality  of  the  beet,  in  cultural  methods,  and  in  factory 
operations,  all  of  which  have  tended  to  reduce  the  cost  of  the  finished 
product. 

The  advances  that  have  been  made  in  cultural  methods  have  been 
offset  to  a  very  great  extent  by  the  increased  cost  of  labor  in  this  coun- 
try, so  that  the  actual  reduction  in  the  cost  of  producing  beet  sugar 
has  been  due  to  the  improvement  of  the  beet  or  to  less  expensive  oper- 
ations in  extracting  and  refining  the  product.  It  appears,  therefore, 
that  there  are  three  avenues  through  which  the  cost  of  producing  beet 
sugar  may  be  increased  or  diminished.  This  article  will  deal  only 
with  those  methods  for  reducing  the  cost  of  beet  sugar  which  bear 
directly  or  indirectly  upon  the  improvement  and  production  of  the  raw 
material — the  sugar  beet — while  the  questions  connected  with  extract- 
ing and  refining  the  sugar  will  be  left  to  the  sugar  chemist  and  to  the 
sugar  engineer. 

In  this  connection  it  may  not  be  out  of  place  to  mention  the  possi- 
bilities of  utilizing  to  greater  advantage  the  by-products  of  the  beet- 
sugar  factory.  The  first  beet-sugar  factory  built  (1S05)  manufactured 
raw  sugar,  wine,  spirits,  and  vinegar.  After  several  years  of  successful 
operation,  the  owner  of  this  factory  stated  that  if  the  sugar  paid  only 
for  operating  the  factory  the  enterprise  would  still  be  a  success.  He 
further  reported  that  the  utilization  of  the  beet  leaves  and  pulp 
enabled  him  to  double  the  number  of  cattle  on  his  farm,  and  the 

265 


266  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMEXT    OF    AGEICUL1UEE. 

manure  thus  produced  greatly  increased  the  yield  of  his  wheat. 
Stockmen  are  rapidly  coming  to  understand  the  value  of  beet  pulp  as 
a  cattle  food,  while  the  possibilities  of  manufacturing  alcohol,  fusel  oil, 
vinegar,  fertilizers,  etc..  from  the  refuse  molasses  have  already  been 
demonstrated.  It  may  be  that  the  ever-increasing  demand  for 
cheaper  sugar,  and  the  constantly  advancing  possibilities  of  utilizing 
the  by-products,  may  eventually  place  the  manufacture  of  sugar  in  that 
class  of  industries  in  which  the  factories  are  operated  for  the  sake  of  the 
by-products.  However,  that  time  is  far  distant,  and  if  the  onward  prog- 
ress of  this  new  industry  is  to  be  maintained  the  manufacture  of  sugar 
for  sugar's  sake  must  be  fostered. 

THE    IMPROVEMENT    OF    THE    BEET. 

INCREASING    THE    SIZE    OF    THE    BEET. 

One  of  the  most  promising  lines  along  which  the  cost  of  producing 
beet  sugar  may  be  reduced,  so  far  as  the  epiestion  relates  to  the  raw 
material,  is  that  of  the  improvement  of  the  beet.  "When  one  examines 
the  wild  beet  and  notes  that  the  roots  weigh  but  a  few  ounces  each, 
he  can  not  help  wondering  at  the  large  tonnage  that  was  sometimes 
produced  early  in  the  nineteenth  century,  when  according  to  pub- 
lished reports  the  yield  frequently  reached  25  tons  of  roots  per  acre. 
It  is  true  that  the  average  yield  was  much  below  this  point,  but  it 
undoubteelly  eompareel  very  favorably  with  the  present  average  yield 
of  beets  in  this  country,  which  according  to  obtainable  figures  is  from 
8  to  10  tons  per  acre.  It  would  appear,  therefore,  that  little  progress 
has  been  made  along  this  line.  That  the  individual  roots  of  the-  culti- 
vated beet  arc  larger  than  those  of  the  wild  beet  there  is  no  question; 
but  it  would  seem  from  a  study  of  comparative  yields  that  the  larger 
the  root  the  fewer  the  beets  which  can  be  produced  per  acre.  This  is 
undoubtedly  true  within  certain  limits:  but,  after  the  most  satisfac- 
tory relation  between  the  number  of  beets  per  acre  and  the  size  of  the 
beets  has  been  determined,  there  are  three  methods  by  which  the  yield 
of  beets  per  acre  may  be  increased  without  diminishing  the  percentage 
of  sugar  in  the  beet:  (1)  By  improved  cultural  methods;  (2)  by  the 
use  of  fertilizers:  and  (3)  by  selection. 

In  regard  to  cultural  methods  used  with  sugar  beets  our  foremost 
agriculturists  do  not  agree.  They  are  unanimous,  however,  in  regard 
to  the  importance  of  early  thinning.  Undoubtedly  many  tons  of 
beets  are  lost  to  the  farmers  and  to  the  factories  annually  by  delaying 
this  important  operation.  In  the  use  of  other  cultural  methods  we 
are  constantly  gaining  new  information  through  our  experiments  and 
through  the  growers'  experience,  which  must  eventually  result  hi  an 
increased  tonnage  of  beets. 

Thorough  cultivation  can  not  be  too  strongly  emphasized  as  a  factor 
in  producing  good  sugar  beets.     It  is  a  common  saying  among  the 


REDUCING    THE    COST    OF    PRODUCING    BEET    SUGAR.  267 

Germans  that  "the  sugar  must  be  hoed. into  the  beet,"  While  it  is 
true  that  the  sunshine  and  the  air  are  the  principal  factors  in  sugar  pro- 
duction, the  cultivator  and  the  hoe  are  important  aids  in  keeping  the 
beet  vigorous  and  active.  At  no  time  in  its  life  should  a  beet  be  allowed 
to  cease  growing,  for  if  it  once  becomes  stunted  it  is  doubtful  whether  it 
will  ever  make  as  good  a  beet  as  it  would  have  been  under  conditions 
of  continuous  growth. 

Numerous  experiments  have  been  conducted  by  the  United  States 
Department  of  Agriculture,  by  the  State  experiment  stations,  and  by 
growers  to  determine  the  proper  relation  between  fertilizers  and  the 
sugar-beet  crop.  While  there  is  still  much  to  be  learned  in  regard  to 
fertilizers,  there  can  be  no  doubt  about  the  benefit  to  be  derived  from 
their  judicious  use  with  sugar  beets. 

The  rotation  of  crops  is  an  important  matter  in  the  growing  of  sugar 
beets,  and  while  the  rotations  must  necessarily  vary  in  different  locali- 
ties there  should  always  be  some  green  crop  in  the  rotation,  preferably 
a  legume,  that  can  be  plowed  under  to  furnish  humus  and  to  supply  at 
least  a  part  of  the  nitrogen. . 

Having  done  everything  possible  by  means  of  cultural  methods  and 
by  the  use  of  fertilizers  of  different  kinds,  there  are  still  promising 
possibilities  in  the  selection  method.  By  this- process,  in  which  experi- 
ments are  already  under  way  in  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry,  it  is 
proposed  to  select  for  seed  production  large  beets  rich  in  sugar,  and 
by  repeated  selection  and  crossing  to  produce  a  strain  of  beets 'that 
will  greatly  increase  the  yield  without  any  decrease  in  the  sugar  con- 
tent of  the  beets.  The  results  should  be  a  much  larger  quantity  of 
sugar  per  acre  without  any  increase  in  the  cost  of  production. 


INCREASING  THE  SUGAR  CONTENT. 


Another  possibility  of  improving  the  beet  is  to  increase  its  sugar 
content.  _  If  this  is  done,  even  without  increasing  the  size  of  the  bee?,  a 
greater  yield  of  sugar  per  acre  may  be  obtained.  When  the  percentage 
of  sugar  obtained  from  the  beet  a  century  ago  is  compared  with  the 
present  sugar  content  of  our  cultivated  beets,  it  is  seen  that  much 
progress  has  already  been  made  in  improving  the  beet  in  this  direction 
A  comparison  of  the  average  percentage  of  sugar  actually  obtained 
from  the  beet  with  the  high  sugar  content  of  the  best  samples  indi- 
cates that  there  is  still  opportunity  to  greatly  increase  the  average 
sugar  content  of  our  beets. 

If  a  largely  increased  yield  of  beets  is  combined  with  a  much  higher 
sugar  content  it  is  entirely  possible  to  obtain  three  times  as  much  sugar 
per  acre  as  is  produced  on  an  average  at  the  present  time.  For 
example,  the  present  average  yield  of  beets  per  acre  in  the  United 
States  is  about  10  tons,  and  the  percentage  of  sugar  actually  extracted 
and  refined  does  not  exceed  12,  making  the  average  yield  of  sugar  per 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTUP.E. 

acre  approximately  2.400  pound-.     Yields  of  more  than  30  tons  of 

beets  per  acre  are  sometimes  obtained,  and  yields  of  more  than  20  tons 

are  common.     From  20  to  25  per  cent  of  sugar  in  the  beets  has  been 

so  frequently  that  it  is  safe  to  assume  that  an  average  sugar 

content  of  18  per  cent  is  within  the  limits  of  possibility.     If  an  average 

yield  of  2  per  acre  and  an  average  sugar  content  of  18  per  cent 

I  be  reached,  we  would  have  an  average  yield  of  7.200  pounds  of 

his  could  be  realized  without  increasing  the  cost  of 

ing  the  bee  -  add  be  entirely  possible  for  the  grower  to 

furnish  the  raw  material  to  the  factory  at  a  somewhat  lower  cost  than 

present  practicable.     This  is  the  first   important  step  toward 

reducing  the  c  production. 

One  of  the  most  important  factors  in  producing  a  beet  rich  in  su 
is  the  proper  selection  of  beets  for  seed  production.     This  is  the  seeds- 
man".- problem,  and  is,  under  the  present  methods  of  beet -seed  produc- 
birely  outside  the  province  of  the  grower  of  factory  beets. 
However,  the  sugar  content  of  bee*  depends  to  a  very  great 

extent  upon  the  soil  and  climatic  conditions.     For  example,  in  1903 
the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  planted  several  varieties  of  sugar-beet 
i  »n  the  Arlington  Experimental  Farm,  near  Washington   This  seed 
duced  from  beefs  that  tested  from  16  to  18  percent  of  sugar. 
The  beets  grown  from  the  seed  tested  in  no  case  more  than  12  per  cent 
-    a  ly  all  the  samples  tested  less  than  10  per  cent. 

-  were  sent  to  Utah  and  planted  for  seed  in  1904.     The 
from  the  seed  produced  from  these  roots  tt 
16  t<>  17  per  cent  of  sugar.     It  will  be  seen,  therefore,  that  while  the 

bee    -  *d  the  tendency  to  produce  a  high  sugar  content,  the 

soil  and  climatic  conditions  in  the  vicinity  of  Washington,  D.  C,  in 
1903  kept  the  sugar  production  too  low  for  practical  purpi 

If  the  c  1  li i -  litions  in  any  locality  appear  to  be  unfavorable 

forsuga:  m,  it   is  not   advisable  to  undertake  to  grow 

le  until  a  beet  has  been  developed  by 

selection  or  otherwise  that  is  adapted  to  that  particular  locality.     It 

been  found  that  clay  loams  and  sandy  loams  are  very  satisfactory 

igar-beet  production,  provided  other  conditions  are  favorable; 

but  more  depends  upon  the  physical  condition  of  the  .-oil  and  upon 

methods  of  cultivation  than  upon  the  particular  kind  or  variety  of  soil 

'..     The  soil  should  be  well  supplied  with  humus  and  well  drained. 

«T    OF    GROWING    BEETS. 

LAND    YA 

In  considering  the  methods  by  which  beet  sugar  may  be  produced 
at  a  smaller  the  raw  material   is  concerned,  there  are 

certain  factors  which  tend  to  increase  rather  than  to  diminish  th< 
of  production.     One  of  these  is  the  increase  of  land  values.     Duiing 


REDUCING    THE    COST    OF    PRODUCING    BEET    SUGAR.  269 

the  past  decade  there  has  been  a  remarkable  advance  in  the  price  of 
farming  lands,  especially  in  those  localities  where  beet-sugar  factories 
are  in  successful  operation.  These  lands  have  become  more  valuable 
not  only  because  they  produce  large  quantities  of  sugar  beets,  but 
because  there  is  a  ready  market  for  the  crop  and  because  other  valu- 
able crops  form  with  the  sugar  beets  a  very  satisfactory  rotation. 
There  are  thousands  of  acres  of  good  farming  lands  where  sugar  beets 
may  be  grown  with  profit  as  soon  as  sugar  factories  are  constructed. 

Five  years  ago  the  land  in  a  certain  valley  in  Utah  was  offered  for 
sale  at-  $20  an  acre.  Since  that  time  a  sugar  factory  has  been  built, 
and  from  6,000  to  8,000  acres  of  sugar  beets  are  grown  in  that  valley 
annually,  bringing  to  the  owners  a  return  of  $75  and  upward  per 
acre.  As  a  result,  practically  none  of  the  land  is  for  sale  at  the  pres- 
ent time.  If  by  force  of  circumstances  a  tract  of  this  land  changes 
hands,  the  price  obtained  is  $100  or  more  per  acre. 

In  some  parts  of  Colorado  sugar  beets,  potatoes,  and  alfalfa  form  a 
rotation  series  to  which  small  grains  arc  sometimes  added.  When  it 
is  realized  that  potatoes  often  yield  from  600  to  S00  bushels  per  acre 
and  sugar  beets  upward  of  20  tons  per  acre,  it  is  not  surprising  that 
this  land  is  held  at  several  hundred  dollars  per  acre;  and  it  may 
be  stated  that  in  none  of  the  sugar-beet  areas  is  the  price  of  land 
decreasing. 

The  theory  that  sugar  beets  will  ruin  the  land  has  long  since  been 
exploded.  The  best  crops  of  sugar  beets  and  other  farm  products 
are  found  on  many  of  the  farms  where  sugar  beets  have  been  grown 
longest.  This  is  in  part  due  to  the  fact  that  good  farmers  have  become 
better  farmers  through  their  experience  in  growing  beets.  Proper 
rotation  of  crops,  good  cultivation,  and  the  judicious  use  of  fertilizers 
are  the  factors  that  keep  the  land  in  good  condition  and  enable  farmers 
to  obtain  the  highest  possible  returns  for  the  labor  and  money  in- 
vested. The  situation  in  regard  to  land  values,  so  far. as  they  relate 
to  sugar  beets,  may  be  stated  as  follows:  Inasmuch  as  sugar  beets 
require  the  best  quality  of  soil  and  demand  that  it  shall  be  in  the 
highest  state  of  cultivation  to  produce  the  best  results,  sugar  beets 
must  remain  a  comparatively  high-priced  crop,  and  any  attempt  to 
reduce  then  price  must  result  either  in  producing  an  unsatisfactory 
crop  or  hi  eliminating  sugar  beets  from  the  system  of  crop  rotation 
in  many  localities. 

COST   OF   LABOR. 

Another  factor  which  up  to  the  present  time  has  had  a  tendency 
to  increase  rather  than  to  diminish  the  cost  of  sugar-beet  production 
is  the  cost  of  labor.  The  price  of  farm  labor,  like  land  values,  has 
increased  materially  within  the  past  few  years.  This  is  especially 
true  of  hand  labor  for  thinning,  pulling,  and  topping  beets.  In  view 
of  the  greatly  increased  cost  within  the  past  decade  of  nearly  all  the 


270  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGSICUL.TUBE. 

necessaries  of  life,  and  with  every  indication  that  the  cost  of  living 
will  not  be  materially  reduced  in  the  near  future,  it  can  not  reasonably 
be  expected  that  farm  wages  will  be  appreciably  lowered  within  the 
next  few  years,  at  least.  It  is  clear  that  the  increased  cost  of  labor 
thus  far  has  had  a  tendency  to  increase  rather  than  to  decrease  the 
cost  of  beet  sugar. 

AMOUNT    OF    L    ." 

Another  phase  of  the  labor  question  should  be  considered  in  this 
connection,  and  that  is  the  amount  of  labor  required  in  growing  an 
acre  of  beets  in  order  to  obtain  the  greatest  profit  from  the  crop.  The 
average  cost  of  growing  and  harvesting  beets  at  present  is  estimated 
to  be  approximately  $30  per  acre.  It  would  undoubtedly  be  poor 
economy  to  lessen  the  cost  of  growing  beets  by  reducing  the  amount 
of  labor  per  acre  under  the  present  conditions.  There  are  some  indi- 
cations that  a  still  larger  expenditure  of  labor  upon  the  crop  would 
produce  a  much  greater  return.     For  example,  several  yi      -  one 

of  the  leading  agricultural  papers  of  this  country  offered  a  series  of 
prizes  for  the  best  crop  of  sugar  beets  to  be  grown  under  certain  con- 
ditions. One  of  the  winners  produced  approximately  30  tons  of 
beets  on  an  acre  of  ground.  The  total  cost  of  growing  this  acre  of 
beets  was  nearly  $60.  A  little  reflection  will  show  that  a  much 
larger  profit  per  acre  was  obtained  in  producing  30  tons  oJ  -  on  a 

given  area  at  an  outlay  of  $60  per  acre  than  would  have  been  made 
by  spending  $30  in  growing  the  present  average  tonnage  on  the  same 
area.     From  this  and  other  examples  that  might  be  cited,  th. 
sion  is  obvious  that  the  production  of  sugar  per  acre  may  be  inert 
by  increasing  the  amount  of  labor  per  acre  in  growing  the  beets. 

:  ABOR. 

The  question  of  obtaining  a  sufficient  number  of  the  right  kind 
of  laborers  to  grow  the  sugar-beet  crop  has  become  one  of  the  most 
complex  and  at  the  same  time  one  of  the  most  important  problems 
in  connection  with  the  sugar-beet  industry  in  nearly  all  the  beet 
areas  in  this  country.  Scarcity  of  labor  has  an  important  bearing 
upon  the  cost  of  sugar  production  in  several  ways,  but  especially  in 
delaying  the  work  and  in  leaving  certain  operations  undone,  the. 
reducing  the  yield  of  sugar  per  acre. 

In  some  localities  no  difficulty  is  experienced  in  obtaining  a  suffi- 
cient number  of  suitable  laborers  throughout  the  season,  especially 
in  those  sections  where  the  farms  are  small  and  the  country  is  th: 
settled  with  good  farmers.  Under  these  circumstances  the  in 
farmer  is  usually  found  growing  a  small  acreage  of  beets — frequently 
not  more  than  from  3  to  10  acres — which  he  is  able  to  care  for  with 
his  own  family,  with  possibly  some  assistance  now  and  then  from  his 
neighbors.     In    this    wav  beets    are    irrown   more    satisfactorilv   as 


EEDL'CIXG    THE    COST    OF    PEODT* CIXG    BEET    SUGAE.  2 1  1 

regards  labor  than  in  any  other.  In  most  of  our  sugar-beet  sections, 
however,  it  is  necessary  to  depend  to  a  greater  or  less  extent  upon 
outside  help.  Just  how  this  labor  is  to  be  secured,  how  it  is  to  be 
retained  throughout  the  season,  and  how  it  can  be  made  a  permanent 
factor  in  the  sugar-beet  industry  are  problems  upon  the  correct 
solution  of  which  the  future  of  the  beet-sugar  industry  depends  to 
a  very  great  extent.  Efforts  are  being  made  to  work  out  these 
problems  in  the  various  localities  where  help  is  needed;  and.  while 
the  conditions  in  the  different  sections  are  not  identical,  a  brief 
review  of  some  of  the  important  methods  used  may  be  helpful. 

In  the  Middle  and  Eastern  States,  and  in  some  of  the  Western 
States,  a  large  part  of  the  labor  in  connection  with  sugar  beets 
must  be  done  during  the  summer,  at  which  time  a  large  number  of 
pupils  and  teachers  from  the  public  schools  are  available  for  the 
work.  Many  growers  take  advantage  of  this  fact,  and  hundreds 
of  school  children  are  employed  annually  in  thinning,  weeding,  and 
hoeing  beets.  In  some  localities  the  teachers,  both  men  and  women. 
spend  a  part  of  the  long  vacation  in  the  beet  fields,  much  to  their 
advantage  physically  as  well  as  financially.  When  this  kind  of  labor 
can  be  employed  it  is  generally  satisfactory,  and  improves  from  season 
to  season  with  the  experience  gained.  Unfortunately  there  is  not 
enough  of  this  kind  of  labor  to  supply  the  demand,  and  in  a  few 
localities  it  is  reported  unsatisfactory. 

If  the  sugar-beet  area  is  located  near  one  or  more  large  cities  a 
considerable  portion  of  the  temporary  labor  comes  from  that  class 
of  city  residents  who  have  no  permanent  employment  and  who  are 
willing  to  go  out  and  work  in  the  fields.  This  is  especially  true  of 
certain  members  of  the  foreign  population,  both  men  and  women, 
who  often  make  excellent  farm  hands.  Most  of  these  laborers 
insist  upon  returning  to  then  homes  in  the  city  at  the  close  of  the 
day.  Xumerous  instances  might  be  cited  of  Polish  women  who 
walk  from  2  to  4  miles  in  the  morning  in  order  to  do  their  dav's 
work  of  thinning,  hoeing,  or  topping  beets,  or  other  farm  work 
that  their  employer  may  require.  (PL  XIII.  fig.  1.)  At  the  close  of 
the  day  they  walk  back  to  their  homes  only  to  repeat  the  same 
operation  the  next  day  and  each  day  throughout  the  season.  Some 
of  the  employers  state  that  this  is  the  best  class  of  labor  that  they 
are  able  to  obtain  on  their  farms. 

Some  of  the  laborers  become  very  skillful  at  this  kind  of  work: 
others  were  familiar  with  it  before  coming  to  this  country  and  depend 
from  the  first  upon  finding  employment  of  this  kind.  However, 
many  of  these  laborers  are  seeking  permanent  employment  in  the 
factories  and  other  enterprises  in  the  city,  so  that  this  class  of  farm 
labor  is  in  constant  danger  of  depletion.  At  best  this  kind  of  labor 
is  limited  by  the  number  of  people  who  are  willing  to  go  out  from 


272  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTUEE. 

the  city  and  do  work  of  this  kind,  and  also  by  the  small  number  of 
farmers  who  are  near  enough  to  the  city  to  allow  the  laborers  to 
return  home  at  the  close  of  the  day.  If  some  of  the  farmers  living 
farther  away  from  the  city  could  induce  some  of  these  families  to 
become  permanent  residents  of  the  rural  districts  it  would  undoubt- 
edly be  mutually  beneficial  in  many  cases.  Various  methods  are 
being  used  in  different  places  to  accomplish  this  result.  In  one  sec- 
tion where  labor  is  scarce  the  officials  of  the  sugar  company  -  _- 
gested  that  each  farmer  build  at  least  one  tenant  house  for  the  ac- 
commodation of  some  of  the  labor  required.  The  farmers  are  acting 
upon  thi  tion,  and  undoubtedly  within  a  few  years  this  com- 

munity will  be  well  supplied  with  good  labor. 

It  is  well  known  that  many  families,  especially  those  of  foreign 
birth,  hesitate  about  going  into  the  country  for  the  reason  that  they 
would,  in  a  way.  become  practically  isolated  from  their  countrymen. 
In  order  to  overcome  this  difficulty  and  at  the  same  time  to  solve 
the  labor  problem  for  the  sugar-beet  industry,  several  sugar  com- 
panies have  purchased  large  tracts  of  land  and  have  offered  various 
inducements  to  laborers  to  settle  upon  the  land  in  colonies.  For 
example,  one  sugar  company  divided  its  land  into  small  farms  of  40 
acres  each,  which  were  sold  at  a  low  price  on  easy  terms.  The  only 
requirement  was  that  the  purchaser  should  grow  a  small  acreage  of 
sugar  beets  for  at  least  two  years,  upon  the  presumption  that  if  beets 
were  grown  for  two  years  the  purchaser  would  be  a  permanent 
grower.  This  plan,  which  was  started  four  years  ago.  worked  out 
satisfactorily.  All  the  land  was  sold  and  each  year  upward  of  6.000 
acre-  *ar  beets  are  grown  for  the  near-by  factory. 

In  another  sugar-beet  section  the  sugar  company  has  divided  its 
land  into  small  farms,  which  it  has  equipped  with  the  necessary  stock 
and  tools  and  on  which  it  has  built  comfortable  houses.  These  places 
are  rented  to  farmers,  who  are  growing  small  areas  of  sugar  beets. 
This  plan  is  working  satisfactorily  for  the  sugar  company  and,  like  the 
preceding  method,  is  of  inestimable  benefit  to  many  families  desirous 
of  becoming  independent  citizens. 

Still  another  sugar  company  has  set  apart  a  portion  of  its  land  with 
a  view  to  forming  a  Russian  colony.  This  land  is  divided  into  acre 
ts,  and  a  small  house  is  built  on  each  tract.  Figure  6  shows 
four  of  these  houses:  that  is.  the  two  buildings  shown  consist  of  two 
houses  each,  placed  side  by  side.  These  houses  are  rented  to  Russian 
families  with  the  definite  understanding  that  when  a  family  has 
worked  for  the  company  a  given  number  of  years  a  deed  for  the  house 
and  lot  will  be  given  to  that  family.  This  plan  is  of  comparatively 
recent  origin,  and  the  effect  that  it  will  have  upon  the  solution  of  the 
labor  question  is  still  problematical.  If  there  is  any  disadvantage  in 
this  plan  over  the  preceding  ones  it  undoubtedly  lies  in  the  fact  that 


REDUCING    THE    COST    OF    PRODUCING    BEET    SUGAR. 


273 


the  tract  of  land  is  not  large  enough  to  support  a  family:  hence,  the 
workers  must  seek  employment  on  other  farms,  necessitating  the 
expenditure  of  considerable  time  and  energy  in  getting  to  and  from 
their  work. 

In  the  same  community  another  plan  has  been  adopted  which 
promises  good  results.  The  important  point,  the  nucleus  of  this  plan, 
is  a  portable  house.  The  outfit,  as  shown  in  figure  7,  consists  of 
a  farmer's  handy  wagon,  the  wheels  of  which  are  28  inches  in  diameter 
and  have  a  5-inch  tread.  The  construction  of  the  house  is  shown  in 
the  cut.  The  outfit  consists  of  a  laundry  stove,  cooking  utensils, 
woven-wire  folding  cots,  mattresses,  and  blankets.  Each  house  will 
accommodate  from  two  to  five  workmen,  and  costs  about  875.  The 
laborers  occupying  one  of  these  houses  contract  to  do  the  hand  work 
for  several  beet  growers  at  a  price  ranging  from  SIS  to  $21  per  acre, 
depending  upon  the  number  of  hoeings,  etc.,  included  in  the  contract. 


" 


:i.  'h% 


& 


Fig.  ij. — Laborers'  houses,  one  to  each  acre  tract — one  method  of  solving  the  labor  question  in  grow- 
ing sugar  beets. 

The  agreement  is  that  when  they  have  finished  one  operation,  such  as 
thinning,  for  one  farmer,  he  will  take  his  team  and  haul  the  house  to 
the  next  farm.  This  house  is  portable,  not  only  in  the  sense  that  it  is 
on  wheels,  but  also  from  the  fact  that  it  is  capable  of  being  taken 
down  and  shipped  on  the  cars.  In  this  way  it  is  easily  shifted  about 
from  community  to  community,  to  the  place  where  it  is  most  needed. 
The  laborers  using  these  houses  are  mostly  Belgians,  who  seem  to 
be  very  satisfactory  in  the  beet  fields  hi  most  instances.  They  are 
tireless  workers,  and  when  employed  by  the  acre  often  utilize  every 
moment  of  davlight  in  caring  for  the  beets  under  their  contract. 
Their  method  of  topping  beets,  as  shown  in  Plate  XIII,  fig.  2,  is  one 
that  seems  to  be  peculiar  to  themselves,  and  is  very  rapid.  The  beets 
are  pulled  and  thrown  in  rows,  with  the  tops  all  one  way,  and  then  in  a 
bent  position,  as  shown  in  the  illustration,  the  laborers  go  up  and  down 
the  rows,  cutting  off  the  tops  and  throwing  the  beets  into  piles.  The 
two  brothers  shown  in  the  illustration  were  photographed  in  190-i 
3    A1906 18 


2:-: 


dzp. 


..::::Tirvr.z. 


:;  on  one  of  their  r(  1906)  thev  rented  a 

I  arm  and  are  growing  their  own  b»:  re  to  predict  that 

in  a  lew  liey  will  be  landowners  and  employers  of  labor. 

In  -    number  s  esc  are  employed  for 

sag;  For  s  riven  community  the  Japanese  art. 

-rough  their  leader,  who  agrees  under  bond  to  fu: 
so  many  laborers  for  the  hand  work  at  some  stipulated  price, 
price  is  abas  me  in  all  the  sugar-beet  see::      — i-20  per  acre. 

army  of  laborers,  often  consisting  oi  ml  hundred  under  one 

b,  and  usually  is,  divided  into  smaller  squads,  which 
are  e  he  various  field-  needed.     They  usually 

form  a  camp  in  which  they  live  by  themselves.     Under  the  dire 
of  a  con.  jreman  they  are  capable  of  doinsr  excellent  work,  but 


.  - .      ...  _  ^ 


:hing 


become  c 
that  ma]  id  or  done. 

in  the  Y^  : he  Chinese  as  labor- 

ers in  the  sugar-beet  fields,  but  owing  to  our  t  ion  laws 

ihey  are  necessarily  xery  scarce,  this  beir  _]]y  true  of  the 

younger  and  more  active  members  of  the  race. 


■.:"-. 


of  labor,  as  well  as  its  scarcity,  has  acted  as  an  ineen- 
ine  of  beet  seed  and  dev:  r  means 

whereby  beets  may  be  grown  with  less  hand  labor,     vr 

wn  that  all  the   labor  performed  in  produci: 
crop  of  q  order  to  obtain  the  best  r  rider 

:  may  be  possible  to  perform  one  or  more  of  these 
in  some  other  manner  with  _ood  or 

-  expense.     ¥  ipie.the 

production  of  single-germ  beet  seed  is  but  a  method  of  thinning  t 
he  seed  ,-d. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XIII. 


Fig.  1  .—Polish  Women  Thinning  Beets. 


Fig.  2.— Belgian  Method  of  Topping  Beets. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XIV. 


Fig.  1.— Power  Hoe  that  may  be  Utilized  in  Blocking  and  Hoeing  Sugar  Beets. 


Fig.  2.— Siloing  Sugar  Beets  for  the  Factory. 


REDUCING    THE    COST    OF    PRODUCING    BEET    SUGAR.  275 

Production  of  single-germ  seed. — Commercial  beet  seed  con- 
sists for  the  most  part  of  from  two  to  seven  individual  seeds  welded  by- 
nature  into  one  mass.  It  is  evident  that  plants  produced  from  such  a 
mass  of  seeds  must  necessarily  be  very  close  together,  and  thus  far  no 
mechanism  has  been  devised  whereby  the  plants  can  be  properly 
thinned.  It  is  clear,  therefore,  that  if  we  expect  to  do  away  with  the 
hand  thinning  of  our  sugar  beets  it  can  probably  be  accomplished  only 
by  changing  the  construction  of  the  seed  ball,  either  naturally  or 
artificially,  so  that  there  will  be  but  one  germ  in  each  ball.  Repeated 
efforts  have  been  made  to  break  up  the  seed  balls  by  passing  them 
through  various  forms  of  rollers  and  grinders  so  that  each  seed  could 
be  planted  by  itself.  The  seed  coats  are  so  hard  that  any  device  that 
has  been  tried  thus  far  that  will  crush  or  break  the  seed  ball  breaks  a 
large  number  of  the  seeds  and  renders  them  useless. 

An  effort  is  being  made  by  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  to  produce 
a  single-germ  beet  seed  by  selection.  The  results  of  this  work  up  to 
the  close  of  last  season  (1905)  are  reported  in  Bulletin  Xo.  73  of  the 
Bureau  of  Plant  Industry,  in  which  it  is  shown  that  the  percentage  of 
single-germ  seeds  has  been  increased  from  less  than  2  to  upward  of  25 
per  cent.a  In  the  light  of  the  advance  that  has  already  been  made  it  is 
reasonably  safe  to  assume  that  this  object  will  finally  be  accomplished 
by  this  means.  After  a  plant  possessing  single-germ  seed  balls  has 
been  produced  it  will  necessarily  be  a  number  of  years  before  a  suffi- 
cient quantity  of  this  seed  can  be  produced  so  that  it  can  be  used 
commercially. 

Thinning. — Meantime,  as  the  industry  grows,  there  will  be  an  ever- 
increasing  demand  for  hand  labor  for  thinning  the  beets.  Many 
growers  have  not  yet  learned  the  importance  of  early  thinning,  and 
consequently  they  try  to  do  the  work  with  an  insufficient  force,  letting 
this  operation,  which  should  be  done  within  a  few  days,  extend  over  a 
period  of  several  weeks,  much  to  the  detriment  of  the  yield  and  con- 
sequently to  the  returns  from  the  crop. 

Hoeing. — The  number  of  hoeings  given  a  crop  of  sugar  beets  varies 
from  two  to  five.  A  single  hoeing  is  much  less  expensive  than  the 
single  operation  of  thinning  or  of  harvesting,  but  the  total  number  of 
hoeings,  if  properly  done,  will  cost  more  than  either  of  the  other  opera- 
tions. It  is  important,  therefore,  that  something  be  done  to  reduce 
the  cost  of  hoeing  sugar  beets.  As  already  pointed  out,  it  would  be 
poor  economy  to  reduce  the  cost  of  hoeing  beets  by  giving  them  a 
smaller  number  of  hoeings  or  by  doing  the  work  less  thoroughly.  On 
the  other  hand,  there  are  indications  that  better  beets  could  be  grown 

o  Since  this  paper  was  -mitten  the  single-germ  seeds  produced  in  1906  have  been 
separated  and  counted,  and  it  is  found  that  several  of  the  plants  yielded  upward  of 
49  per  cent  of  single-germ  seeds.  A  large  number  of  the  plants  produced  more  than 
30  per  cent. 


276  YEAEBOOK    Of    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

if  more  attention  were  given  to  this  phase  of  sugar-beet  culture.  If 
anything  is  to  be  gained  over  the  present  method  of  hoeing  beets  it 
must  be  by  means  of  a  machine  that  will  do  the  -work  more  thor- 
oughly or  at  a  lower  cost  per  acre.  A  power  hoe  has  recently  been 
invented  and  successfully  used  in  the  cotton  fields.  Although  not 
yet  tried  in  connection  with  sugar  beets,  it  would  seem  from  its  con- 
struction that  it  could  be  used  to  considerable  advantage  in  the  beet 
fields.  This  hoe  consists  of  a  metal  disk  which  may  be  forced  into  the 
ground  to  any  desired  depth,  and  is  made  to  rotate  rapidly  in  a  plane 
parallel  to  the  surface  of^the  ground.  The  power  that  causes  the 
disk  to  rotate  is  furnished  by  a  gasoline  engine,  while  the  movement 
around  the  plant  is  guided  by  the  human  hand,  as  shown  in  the  illus- 
tration. (See  PL  XIV,  fig.  1.)  It  is  claimed  for  this  machine  that 
from  five  to  six  times  as  much  work  can  be  done  per  day  with  one 
of  these  hoes  as  can  be  done  by  the  same  man  with  a  hand  hoe.  If 
this  particular  implement  is  not  adapted  to  sugar-beet  work  it  will 
doubtless  lead  to  something  whereby  artificial  power  may  be  used  in 
blocking  and  hoeing  sugar  beets. 

Cultivating. — Several  cultivations  are  necessary  in  the  growing 
season.  The  number  of  cultivations  and  the  depth  and  distance 
from  the  beets  that  the  teeth  of  the  cultivator  should  operate  are 
moot  questions  among  agriculturists.  It  is  agreed  that  different 
conditions  require  different  treatments,  and  hence  the  expense  of  culti- 
vating beets  must  depend  somewhat  upon  soil  and  weather  conditions. 
However,  the  single  cultivator  has  given  way  to  a  great  extent  to  the 
two-row  cultivator,  and  recently  a  four-row  cultivator  has  been 
devised  and  put  in  operation,  so  that  the  cost  of  each  cultivation  is 
greatly  reduced.  The  initial  cost  of  the  four-row  cultivator  is  greater 
than  that  of  a  single-row  cultivator,  but  the  additional  outlay  is  soon 
made  up  if  there  is  a  considerable  acreage  of  beets  to  be  cared  for. 

Harvesting. — Harvesting  sugar  beets  consists  of  three  distinct 
operations,  viz,  lifting,  pulling,  and  topping.  For  many  years  lift- 
ing or  loosening  the  beets  has  been  done  by  horse  power.  In  some 
parts  of  the  West  steam  power  is  now  being  used  for  this  purpose. 
Two  kinds  of  lifters  are  in  general  use,  one  consisting  of  a  side'  plow, 
which  passes  along  one  side  of  the  beet  row  and  loosens  each  beet  by 
pressing  slightly  against  it  and  at  the  same  time  plowing  it  up.  The 
other  form  might  be  described  as  a  plow  with  two  points  or  shoes,  so 
arranged  that  as  they  pass  along  on  either  side  of  the  beet  row  each 
individual  beet  is  caught  between  the  points  and  lifted  slightly,  so  that 
it  is  left  perfectly  loose  in  the  ground.  The  beets  must  then  be  pulled 
and  topped  by  hand. 

Many  forms  of  beet  harvesters  have  been  constructed,  but  none 
has  come  into  general  use.  It  is  the  aim  of  the  inventor  of  the 
beet  harvester  to  perform  the  three  operations  at  the  same  time. 


REDUCING    THE    COST    OF    PRODUCING    BEET    SUGAR.  277 

Some  inventors  aim  to  top  the  beet  and  then  pull  it;  while  others 
maintain  that  the  beet  must  be  first  pulled  and  then  topped.  If  the 
beets  are  topped  and  afterwards  pulled,  there  seems  to  be  some  diffi- 
culty about  getting  all  of  them  out  of  the  ground.  On  the  other 
hand,  if  the  beets  are  first  pulled  and  then  topped,  considerable  diffi- 
culty is  experienced  in  topping  them  correctly,  owing  to  the  variation 
in  the  size  of  the  beets  and  the  difference  in  the  length  and  size  of  the 
crowns.  Several  new  harvesters  are  in  the  field  this  year  (1906),  and 
it  is  probably  a  question  of  only  a  few  years  when  the  harvester  in  the 
beet  field  will  be  as  common  as  it  is  in  the  grain  field.  The  cost  of 
hand  work  in  harvesting  beets  is  from  $5  to  $8  per  acre.  It  must  be 
remembered  that  no  machine  annihilates  the  cost  of  any  farming 
operation,  but  that  a  satisfactory  beet  harvester  would  greatly  reduce 
the  expense  of  harvesting  the  crop  is  evident. 

Transporting  to  factory. — Another  important  factor  in  the  cost 
of  producing  the  raw  material  is  the  expense  involved  in  transporting 
the  beets  from  the  farm  to  the  factory.  If  the  field  is  located  near  the 
factory  and  the  roads  are  level  and  well  made  the  beets  may  be 
delivered  at  a  minimum  cost.  As  the  distance  from  the  factory 
increases,  more  time  is  consumed,  and  consequently  the  expense  is 
increased.  The  importance  of  good  roads  can  not  be  overestimated. 
It  frequently  happens  that  the  fall  rains  begin  before  the  beets  are 
delivered,  and  unless  the  roads  are  well  made  they  are  soon  full  of 
holes  and  ruts  that  make  it  impossible  to  haul  more  than  half  a  load 
at  a  time,  practically  doubling  the  expense  of  delivering  the  crop. 
One  effect  of  the  sugar-beet  industry  is  the  improvement  of  the  coun- 
try roads,  and  conversely  the  improvement  of  the  country  roads  is  an 
aid  to  the  sugar-beet  industry. 

Railroad  facilities  and  rates  play  an  important  part  in  the  cost  of 
delivering  the  sugar-beet  crop.  Very  few  factories  grow  all  their 
beets  within  hauling  distance.  The  grower  and  sugar  company  are 
fortunate  if  the  railroads  so  radiate  from  the  vicinity  of  the  factory 
that  the  beets  grown  in  a  given  community  can  be  brought  in  over  one 
line  of  road.  It  is  often  the  case,  however,  that  the  cars  must  be  sent 
over  two  or  more  roads,  which  necessarily  increases  the  expense.  It 
too  often  happens  that  there  is  an  insufficient  supply  of  cars  at  the 
time  they  are  wanted  or  the  cars  furnished  are  not  adapted  to  handling 
sugar  beets;  consequently  considerable  time  is  lost  in  loading  and 
unloading  the  beets.  All  these  things  are  adjusting  themselves  gradu- 
ally to  the  betterment  of  the  industry  through  the  persistent  efforts  of 
those  interested. 

Destroying  weeds. — The  improvement  of  farming  methods  has 
been  mentioned  as  playing  a  significant  part  in  sugar-beet  growing. 
One  point  that  should  be  emphasized  in  this  connection  is  the  impor- 
tance of  destroying  weeds.     This  work  should  not  be  confined  to  the 


278  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

beet  fields.  Adjacent  fields,  roadsides,  fence  rows,  and  vacant  lots 
should  be  watched  and  the  weeds  destroyed  before  they  go  to  seed. 
It  is  not  uncommon  to  find  beet  fields  that  are  in  fairly  good  condi- 
tion while  the  roadside  just  over  the  fence  is  full  of  weeds.  Some  of 
the  seeds  of  these  weeds  will  certainly  be  scattered  by  various  agencies 
over  the  field  and  be  ready  for  growth  the  next  year.  The  destruc- 
tion of  weeds  for  a  single  season  will  not  always  produce  appreciable 
results,  for  the  reason  that  a  large  number  of  weed  seeds  remain  alive 
in  the  ground  for  a  number  of  years.  Persistent  efforts  in  destroying 
weeds,  however,  will  result  after  a  few  years  in  greatly  reducing  the 
labor  of  keeping  beet  fields  free  from  these  pests. 

Siloing  the  beets. — Another  expense  that  must  be  reckoned 
with  under  certain  circumstances  is  that  of  siloing  the  beets.  This 
becomes  necessary  when  the  beets  must  be  harvested  faster  than 
they  can  be  handled  at  the  factory.  It  will  be  seen  at  once  that 
siloing  the  beets  necessitates  an  extra  handling  of  the  crop,  since  they 
must  be  reloaded  into  the  wagons  and  hauled  to  the  factory  or  dump- 
ing station.  Inasmuch  as  siloing  factory  beets  has  not  yet  come  into 
general  practice  in  all  of  the  beet-growing  localities,  a  fair  idea  of  the 
methods  employed  and  labor  involved  may  be  gamed  by  referrm 
Plate  XIV.  figure  2.  In  addition  to  the  extra  expense  involved,  which 
varies  from  20  cents  to  SI  a  ton.  there  is  more  or  less  shrinkage  in  weight 
due  to  evaporation.  To  avoid  the  expense  and  loss  incident  to  siloing 
the  beets  an  effort  is  being  made  by  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  to 
lengthen  the  harvesting  season  by  producing  an  early-maturing  beet. 
It  is  hoped  by  this  means  to  so  distribute  the  ripening  period  that  the 
factory  will  be  able  to  handle  the  beets  as  soon  as  they  are  harvested. 

SUMMABT. 

While  the  methods  of  cheapening  the  process  of  making  beet  sugar 
can  not  be  adequately  treated  in  a  short  article  of  this  kind,  the 
principal  points  to  be  aimed  at  may  be  summed  up  as  follows: 

(1)  Increasing  the  tonnage  without  increasing  cost  of  production. 

(2)  Improving  the  quality  of  the  beets  without  additional  expense. 

(3)  Improving  the  beet  in  size  and  quality,  or  both,  at  additional 
expense,  but  in  such  ratio  that  the  gain  is  greater  than  the  outlay. 

(4)  Providing  a  sufficient  quantity  of  suitable  labor  at  the  proper 
time  so  that  the  beets  may  be  kept  growing  without  interruption. 

(5)  Modifying  the  beet  seed  so  as  to  render  thinning  unnecessary. 

(6)  Modifying  the  beet  so  that  siloing  for  the  factory  will  not  be 
necessary. 

(7)  Devising  machinery  that  will  do  away  with  hand  labor. 
Improving  farming  methods  and  operations  so  that  less  labor 

will  be  required  to  produce  the  crop. 

(9)  Improving  wagon  roads  and  railroad  facilities. 


COKX-BKEEDIXG  WORK  AT  THE  EXPERIMENT  STATIONS. 


By  J.  I.  Schume, 
Of  the  Office  of  Experiment  Stations. 


The  com  produced  m  the  United  States  each  year  is  worth  more 
than  a  billion  dollars— nearly  twice  as  much  as  any  other  crop      This 
immense  resource  has  been  practically  created  since  the  United  States 
has  existed  as  a  nation.     Corn  was  cultivated  by  the  Indians  before 
tne   Western  World  was  discovered,  and  hence  was  the  first  of  the 
common  cereals  to  be  grown  under  the  care  of  man  on  American  soil 
ihe  most  rapid  development  in  com  production,  however,  has  taken 
place  during  the  last  forty  years,  the  annual  yield  for  the  entire  coun- 
try   having    approximately    trebled    during    that    time      The    vast 
increase  m  production  is  of  course-  mainly  due  to  the  increase  in  the 
acreage  devoted  to  corn  culture,  but  it  may  also  be  attributed  in  part 
to  improvement  in  the  plant  itself.     Ever  since  corn  came  under  the 
beneficent  influence  of  agriculture,  such  improvement  has  been  in 
progress,  at  first  unconsciously  and  later  consciously,  but  with  the 
principles  of  corn  breeding  very  little  understood.     The  earlier  work 
which  was  of  slow  progress,  adapted  the  crop  to  a  wider  range  of  lati- 
tude ami  assured  greater  success  in  its  culture  over  large  areas,  par- 
ticularly m  the  northern  portions  of  the  corn  belt.     While  we  are  .till 
far  from  completely  understanding  the  principles  underiying  the  im- 
provement of  the  com  plant  by  breeding,  the  work  of  the  experiment 
stations  has  elucidated  the  subject  to  a  considerable  extent  and  has 
shown  the  farmer  how  to  apply  the  principles  alreadv  demonstrated 
During  recent  years  the  improvement  of  our  corn  varieties  has 
become  a  matter  of  great  general  interest  among  experiment-station 
men  and  progressive  farmers.     There  has  been  a  sort  of  agricultural 
awakening,  largely  due  to  the  realization  of  what  can  be  accomplished 
with  a  crop  of  such  magnitude  and  one  so  ready  to  respond  to  intelli- 
gent treatment.     Experimental  work  in  agricultural  lines,  especially 
if  its  results  are  to  be  far-reacliing,  generally  requires  considerable 
time  lor  the  accumulation  of  data,  their  verification,  and  the  dis- 
semmation  and  application  of  the  information  secured,  but  in  the 
work  of  corn  improvement  the  stations  have  been  successful  in  inter- 
esting the  farmer,  and  even  the  general  public,  in  a  comparatively  short 
period  of  time. 


279 


280  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

GENERAL    FEATURES    OF    THE    MOVEMENT. 

An  increase  in  yield  is  brought  about  by  bettering  the  environment 
of  the  plant  or  by  improving  the  character  of  the  plant  itself.  All 
improvement  within  the  plant  is  based,  on  the  one  hand,  on  varia- 
tion or  the  tendency  of  offspring  to  differ  in  some  respects  from  par- 
ents, and,  on  the  other,  on  heredity  or  the  tendency  of  progeny  to 
possess  characteristics  in  common  with  parents  and  other  blood  rela- 
tives. That  the  corn  plant  has  undergone  a  marked  change  since  the 
beginning  of  its  culture  is  unquestionable.  Until  quite  recently  all 
of  the  corn  crop  was  harvested  by  hand,  winch  gave  the  grower  an 
opportunity  to  observe  all  the  larger,  well-formed  ears,  and  to  select 
the  best  appearing  ones  for  seed.  Simple  selection  of  the  ears  was 
the  beginning  of  corn  improvement  and  the  only  method  followed 
from  the  earliest  periods  of  American  agriculture.  It  is  not  surprising 
that  artificial  crossing  was  not  employed  in  the  early  improvement 
work  when  we  consider  that  it  was  only  a  little  more  than  two  hun- 
dred years  ago  that  the  sexuality  of  plants  was  discovered  and  that 
the  manner  of  manipulating  the  blossoms  in  the  process  of  cross- 
breeding was  even  then  not  so  well  known  either  inside  or  outside  of 
scientific  circles  as  it  is  at  present.  Only  during  the  last  century  has 
this  knowledge  found  a  more  or  less  large  and  direct  application  in  the 
improvement  of  cultivated  crops. 

It  was  by  constant  and  continued  selection  for  a  long  series  of  years 
that  many  of  the  common  and  well-known  varieties,  such  as  Reid 
Yellow  Dent,  Golden  Eagle,  Iowa  Silver  Mine,  Learning,  and  Boone 
County  White,  were  brought  to  their  present  high  standard  of  per- 
fection, with  their  characteristics  generalby  well  fixed  and  uniformly 
reproduced,  thus  showing  that  marked  improvement  in  varieties 
of  corn  may  be  brought  about  by  selection  without  crossing.  Cross- 
breeding has  entered  into  the  origination  of  some  of  the  standard  vari- 
eties, as,  for  instance,  Riley  Favorite,  established  a  little  more  than 
twenty  years  ago,  which  is  a  hybrid  resulting  from  a  cross  between 
Golden  Yellow,  a  large  late  variety,  and  Pride  of  the  North,  a  small 
early  maturing  sort.  In  the  more  recent  efforts  to  fix  the  character- 
istics of  the  desired  type  the  breeding-plat  idea  was  adopted,  the 
new  seed  being  planted  by  itself  away  from  other  corn  and  all  tassels 
of  barren  and  otherwise  undesirable  stalks  removed  as  soon  as  they 
appeared,  to  prevent  them  from  producing  pollen  and  fertilizing  the 
future  seed  on  the  healthy  and  otherwise  normal  plants. 

In  animal  breeding  selection  is  comparatively  easy  and  a  pedigree 
record  on  both  the  male  and  female  sides  is  readily  established,  but  in 
plant  breeding  we  meet  with  considerable  difficulty  in  this  connection. 
We  can  be  absolutely  certain  of  the  male  parent  of  an  ear  of  corn  only 


CORN-BREEDING    WORK    AT    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS.  281 

when  we  have  excluded  all  pollen  from  the  mother  plant  and  fertilized 
the  blossoms  with  the  pollen  from  a  particular  plant.  It  is  possible 
to  do  this  only  with  a  few  plants  on  account  of  the  time  required  for 
the  proper  performance  of  the  work,  and  on  a  larger  scale  it  becomes 
impracticable.  The  only  practical  and  the  nearest  possible  solution 
of  the  problem  is  the  use  of  the  isolated  breeding  plat,  in  which  only 
seed  of  known  breeding  is  planted  and  in  which  all  blossoms  are 
naturally  fertilized  with  pollen  from  plants  of  equal  breeding,  although 
it  is  impossible  by  this  method  to  know  the  individual  stalk  or  stalks 
furnishing  the  pollen  for  any  particular  ear  or  the  stalk  producing  the 
pollen  for  any  particular  blossom  or  rudimentary  grain.  In  this 
connection  it  may  be  pointed  out  that  even  in  the  breeding  plat  with 
its  plants  of  equal  breeding  there  may  be  three  different  relationships 
between  the  pollen  and  the  blossom  which  it  fertilizes,  or,  as  we  may 
say,  three  kinds  of  pollination  are  possible,  namely,  self-pollination, 
close-pollination,  and  cross-pollination.  In  self-pollination  the  pollen 
produced  by  a  particular  plant  falls  upon  the  silks  and  fertilizes  the 
blossoms  of  the  same  plant.  In  close-pollination  the  pollen  from  a 
particular  plant  fertilizes  the  blossom  of  the  plant  grown  from  the 
same  seed  ear,  i.  e.,  the  two  plants  have  the  same  mother  ear.  In 
cross-pollination  the  pollen  from  the  tassel  of  one  plant  fertilizes  the 
blossoms  of  another  plant  grown  from  a  different  mother  ear.  Recent 
experiment-station  work  has  brought  forth  a  system  of-corn  breeding 
in  which  inbreeding  is  practically  entirely  prevented.  By  this 
method  self-pollination  and  close-pollination  become  impossible,  and 
breeding  between  distantly  related  plants  becomes  merely  a  remote 
possibility. 

The  first  lines  of  the  experiment-station  work  with  corn  comprised 
variety  tests  of  cultural  factors,  such  as  depth  and  time  of  plowing; 
time,  manner,  and  depth  of  planting;  distances  between  rows  and 
intervals  between  plants  in  a  row;  depth,  frequency,  and  manner  of 
cultivation;  and  other  problems.  After  considerable  light  had  been 
thrown  upon  many  of  these  questions,  the  improvement  of  corn  by 
selection,  and  by  breeding  and  selection,  received  more  attention. 
This  work  was  inaugurated  and  is  still  continued  with  a  view  to 
getting  larger  yields  of  shelled  corn,  rich  in  starch,  oil,  or  protein,  as 
the  purpose  for  which  the  crop  is  intended  may  require.  By  their 
work  the  stations  have  shown  the  susceptibility  of  the  corn  plant  to 
change  in  location  of  ears,  quantity  of  leaves,  and  number  of  suckers, 
as  well  as  to  change  in  the  composition  of  the  grain  and  other  char- 
acters. The  increase  in  yield  has,  of  course,  received  the  most 
attention,  and  in  this  connection  it  has  been  shown  how  individual 
ears  may  differ  in  productivity,  although  of  the  same  variety  and 
produced  under  identical  conditions. 


282  YEARBOOK    01  SffCUI/TU 

r.E"  ire. 

The  principal  obje»  d  breeding  at  the  experi: 

an  increase  in  the  yield  of  shelled  corn  per  aci  orn  plant  varies 

in  height  from  2  to  15  feet,  according  to  variety  and  climate.     The 
:iges  from  three  1  -  "en  months. 

The  ear  varies  in  shape,  ^ize.  thi  ge  of  grain, 

ad  depth  and  width  of  kernel.     The  stalk  varies  in 
as,  number  and  tvpe  of  -ition  of 

ear.  productivity,  tendency  to  sucker,  el  -  aria t ions  are  all 

turned  to  account  in  com  breeding.     The  problem  is  to  indicate  how 
the  vari.  lay  be  best  ion  should  be  nu 

and  how  favorable-  characteristics  which  appear  may  be  fixed  and 
retained. 

-  --POTT.TXATIOy. 

Experiments  in  the  improvement  of  corn  by  cross-fertil  uve 

been  carried  on  by  seven  -.  but  this  line  of 

inves  i  seems   to  have   been  more  prominent  some  years  ago 

than  it  i-  the  work  in  breeding  being  at  present  largely  devoted 

reeding  on  a  lanj  by  methods  applicable  in 

provement  by  lination  rried  on  at  the  Ka: 

I  ^90.  and  numerous  * hus 

red  wei  :   I      The  different  races,  such  as  de: 

sweet,  and  pop  corn,  apparently  crossed  readily.     In  a  com- 
paratively f  n  aerally  in  sweet-corn  varieties,  the  effec 

-ing  were  visible  the  first  year.     The  second  generation  usually 
more  or  less  completely  blended  and  often  exactly  inter- 
between  the  two  parent  typ  re  rarely  the  grains  of  a 
single  ear  were  unlike  each  other,  resembling  closely  or  remotely  one 
parent  or  the  other.     The  third  year  the  produce  was  generally  true 
»d. 
:ie  blue  kernels,  found  on  ea  immediate  par 
were  known  to  have  shown  no  kerne!                        r.  were  planted,  and 
one  of  the  resulting  e                              1  with  pollen  from  th  alk. 
ear  contain         1                     A  which  206  were  blue.  71  pink.  71 
orange-yellow,  and  22  pure  white.     Five  other  ears  from  the  same 
he  pollen  of  other  va:                owed  the  same  variation 
with  a  slightly  smaller  percentage  of  blue.     In  studying  the 
prepotency  of  the  blue  corn  a  large  number  of  ears  on  other  plats 
near  by  were  examined,  and  it  was  found  that  about  half  the  number 
of  uninclosed  ears  had  from  1  to  5  blue  kernels,  while  of  inclosed 
not  one  showed  a  trace  of  blue.     This  result  also  showed  that  inclosing 
the  ears  in  ci                ven  cloth  sacks  is  et:             in  keeping  out  foreign 
pollen. 


CORX-BREEDING    WORK    AT    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS.  283 

Observations  on  the  effects  of  cross-fertilization  at  the  Iowa  station 
have  brought  out  the  fact  that  the  tassels  and  the  silks  of  the  upper 
primary  ears  generally  appeared  about  the  same  time,  and  that  the 
pollen  of  the  upper  central  spikes  of  the  tassels  usually  falls  about 
twenty-four  hours  before  that  of  the  lateral  spikes.  The  first  silks 
protruding  through  the  husk  are  from  the  lower  end  or  butt  of  the 
ear.  and  the  silks  above  them  appear  gradually  until  all  are  exposed, 
the  time  required  for  this  process  being  usually  from  two  to  five  days; 
but  frequently  the  upper  silks  are  not  more  than  twenty-four  hours 
later  in  appearing  than  the  lower,  and  sometimes  they  are  ten  days 
later.  It  was  found  that  usually  twenty-four  hours  elapsed  before 
the  silks  were  in  the  receptive  condition  after  their  first  appearance. 
When  it  takes  four  or  five  days  for  all  the  silks  to  appear,  the  lower 
grains  of  corn  start  their  development  before  those  farther  up  on  the 
ear  begin  to  grow  and  are,  therefore,  strong  enough  to  rob  the  younger 
and  weaker  grains  and  to  cause  them  to  die  from  starvation.  These 
conditions  are  considered  the  cause  of  the  lack  of  proper  filling  at  the 
point  of  the  ear.  But  when  the  silks  all  appear  within  twenty-four 
hours  or  less,  the  ears  develop  simultaneously  at  both  ends,  making 
a  properly  filled  ear  from  butt  to  tip.  It  is  concluded  froin  the  obser- 
vations made  that  the  best  corn  for  Iowa,  when  well  grown,  should 
not  exceed  9§  feet  in  height,  the  ears  being  oh  feet  from  the  ground, 
and  each  stalk  having  13  blades.  In  its  early  improvement  work 
this  station  demonstrated  the  value  of  planting  the  corn  in  an  isolated 
field  for  the  purpose  of  carrying  on  breeding  experiments,  and  the 
results  obtained,  together  with  the  experience  at  other  stations,  sug- 
gested the  idea  of  developing  the  breeding  plat. 

Work  in  corn  improvement  was  begun  at  the  Illinois  station  in  1S89, 
crosses  being  made  between  varieties  of  dent  corn  and  varieties  of 
dent,  sweet,  and  pop  corn.  In  the  crosses  between  varieties  of  dent 
corn  of  the  same  color  or  between  varieties  of  sweet  corn  of  the  same 
color  the  change  in  the  crossed  ear  could  not  with  certainty  be 
attributed  to  the  influence  of  the  pollen,  the  variations  in  these  ears 
being  apparently  no  greater  than  in  those  of  the  same  variety  left  to 
form  naturally.  Ears  produced  by  crossing  white  sweet  corn  with 
pollen  of  the  yellow  dent  corn  were  nearly  as  dark  as  the  male  parent, 
with  kernels  very,  much  like  flint  corn  in  appearance  and  with  the 
taste  characteristic  of  dent  corn.  Where  both  sweet  and  dent  kernels 
appeared  on  the  same  ear  the  dent  kernels  were  always  the  heavier. 
It  was  observed  that  color,  where  it  is  a  character  of  the  kernels  and 
not  of  the  seed  coat,  tends  very  strongly  to  pass  from  one  variety  to 
another.  Crosses  in  which  yellow  dent  corn  was  the  male  and  sweet 
corn  the  female,  yellow  sweet  the  male  and  white  sweet  the  female, 
and  yellow  pop  corn  the  male  and  white  dent  the  female,  exhibited  the 
greatest  degree  of  success.     On  19  ears  produced  by  these  various 


284  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

crosses  only  2  kernels  did  not  show  distinctly  the  effects  of  the  pollen. 
Of  sweet  corn  stalks  bearing  2  ears,  one  crossed  artificially  and  the 
other  left  to  be  naturally  fertilized,  there  was  no  indication  of  any- 
thing but  sweet  corn  on  the  naturally  fertilized  ears.  All  crosses 
except  the  pure  dent  corn  crosses  were  planted,  and  during  the  first 
growing  season  the  uniformity  of  the  plats  was  very  noticeable.  The 
number  of  rows  of  kernels  on  the  ear  seemed  to  be  modified  about 
equally  by  each  parent,  and  the  number  of  ears  to  the  stalk  showed 
a  tendency  to  follow  the  same  type  as  the  stalk.  The  ears  from  each 
of  the  crossed  plats  were  as  uniform  as  the  commonest  varieties  of 
corn,  and  the  crosses  of  different  varieties  showed  the  characters  of 
each  parent  to  about  the  same  extent.  The  crosses  between  pop  corn 
and  dent  corn  seem  to  show  the  effect  of  the  male  more  than  of  the 
female  parent,  while  those  of  which  pop  corn  was  the  male  parent 
were  more  flinty  than  those  in  which  the  dent  corn  had  furnished 
the  pollen.  The  corn  grown  from  the  crossed  seed  was  in  nearly  all 
cases  increased  in  size  as  a  result  of  the  crossing. 

The  second  year  the  corn  continued  to  be  comparatively  uniform 
in  type  where  the  parent  varieties  were  similar,  but  where  the}*  were 
different,  as  in  the  crosses  between  sweet  and  dent,  the  progeny 
tended  strongly  to  run  back  to  the  parent  forms,  while  at  the  same 
time  taking  on  other  forms  different  from  either.  Nearly  all  the 
corn  grown  the  second  year  was  smaller  than  that  grown  the  first 
year,  although  most  of  it  larger  than  that  of  the  parent  varieties. 
Some  of  the  varieties  which  might  be  supposed  to  be  most  nearly 
related,  as  the  sweet  corns,  showed  very  little  increase  when  grown 
from  crossed  seed,  while  the  two  varieties  of  pop  corn,  which  would 
seem  as  nearly  related  to  each  other  as  the  varieties  of  sweet  corn, 
gave  a  very  decided  increase  in  size  when  grown  from  crossed  seed. 
Corn  from  the  crosses  of  Black  Mexican  and  White  Dent,  two  widely 
different  varieties,  showed  a  decrease  in  size,  while  that  from  Flour 
corn  and  Golden  Coin,  varieties  apparently  as  widely  different  as 
any  crossed,  gave  ears  showing  the  greatest  proportionate  gain  in 
size.  There  seemed  to  be  a  strong  tendency  of  the  progeny  of  the 
different  varieties  of  dent,  sweet,  and  pop  corn  toward  the  flint  type. 

In  1S92  in  each  of  five  cases  the  yield  from  plats  of  cross-bred  corn 
was  larger  than  the  average  yield  of  plats  planted  with  varieties 
which  had  not  been  crossed,  the  average  increase  being  more  than 
9  bushels  per  acre.  In  1893  seed  from  cross-fertilized  ears  in  every 
instance  produced  a  larger  yield  and  larger  stalks  than  seed  from  self- 
fertilized  ears,  but  the  cars  of  the  latter  were  more  uniform  in  char- 
acter. In  1893  in  three  out  of  four  cases  the  yield  from  cross-bred 
seed  was  greater  by  2.3  bushels  per  acre  than  the  average  yield  of 
the  parent  varieties.  In  1894  the  seed  from  cross-fertilized  plants 
selected  in  1S92  and  1893  gave  an  average  increase  of  12  bushels  per 
acre  over  the  parent  varieties. 


COBfT-BBEEDING    WORK   AT    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS.  285 

Of  numerous  crosses  made  by  the  Wisconsin  experiment  station, 
Wisconsin  No.  8  corn  on  Toole  North  Star  has  given  promise  of  the 
best  results.  The  new  variety  appears  to  have  a  larger  ear  than  the 
Wisconsin  No.  S  and  a  shorter  maturing  period  than  the  Toole  North 
Star.  In  a  culture  test  this  variety  was  ripe  for  cutting  September 
26.  126  days  after  planting,  while  the  preceding  year  Wisconsin  No. 
S  ripened  in  120  days  and  Toole  North  Star  in  133. 

OBSERVATIONS    OX    THE    MIXING     OF    CORN. 

At  the  Minnesota  station  Mercer  Yellow  flint  corn  hi  proximity  to 
Black  Mexican  sweet  corn  produced  several  black  grains  on  some  of 
the  ears.  A  dozen  of  these  dark-colored  grains  were  planted  and 
protected  from  pollen  from  other  varieties.  The  ears  produced 
showed  that  the  Black  Mexican  corn  had  fertilized  dark-colored 
grams  on  the  ears  of  flint  corn  the  preceding  year.  Besides  the  yellow 
hint  and  black  sweet  grams,  there  were  white  sweet  and  white  flint 
grams  on  nearly  every  ear.  which  is  taken  as  showing  the  ancestry 
of  this  cross.  It  is  possible  that  both  parents  had  been  crossed  with 
different  varieties  and  that  the  different  ancestral  characteristics 
reappeared,  and  from  these  results  the  importance  of  keeping  seed 
pure  is  evident. 

The  Rhode  Island  station  planted  Longfellow  flint  corn  in  close 
proximity  to  sweet  corn,  but  the  resulting  ears  failed  to  show  any 
kernels  of  the  sweet  corn  type  on  the  ears  of  the  flint  corn,  although 
the  yellow  kernels  were  very  numerous  on  the  sweet  corn,  being 
mostly  found  on  ears  taken  from  rows  next  the  yellow  corn. 

CHANGING    THE    CHEMICAL    COMPOSITION    OF    THE    KERNEL    BY    BREEDING. 

After  cross-fertilization  and  its  effects  had  been  studied  for  a  series 
of  years,  the  efforts  of  the  stations  were  turned  toward  the  improve- 
ment of  the  chemical  composition  of  the  kernel.  At  the  Illinois 
station  this  special  study  was  begun  in  1S96.  and  the  first  results 
indicated  that  kernels  of  the  same  ear  are  much  more  uniform  in 
chemical  composition  than  different  ears  of  the  same  variety,  which 
often  show  a  wide  variation  in  this  respect.  Similar  work  at  the 
Kansas  station  showed  that  in  33  varieties  under  investigation  the 
nitrogen  content  ranged  from  1.56  to  2.26  per  cent:  in  different  ears 
of  a  variety  grown  for  thirty  years  it  ranged  from  1.53  to  2.24  per 
cent,  and  in  ears  of  a  cross  originated  the  previous  year  from  1.35  to 
2.22  per  cent.  In  these  tests  the  nitrogen  content  of  single  kernels 
from  the  same  ear  also  showed  variations,  but  not  to  so  great  an 
extent  as  among  different  ears  of  the  same  variety.  It  was  also 
found  that  the  specific  gravity  of  kernels  is  too  uncertain  a  factor  for 
the  selection  of  corn  rich  in  nitrogen.     Of  the  original  33  varieties. 


286  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

21  were  selected  for  breeding  purposes,  and  for  three  years  the  cr 
obtained  showed  remarkably  high  percentages  of  nitrogen  in  many 
-.     In  12  cases  the  average  was  about  2.40  per  cent  of  nitrogen, 
or  15  per  cent  of  protein. 

Subsequent  to  the  preliminary  work  above  referred  to,  the  Illinois 
ion  took  up  the  work  of  breeding  for  high  and  low  protein  and 
high  and  low  fat  content  in  the  kernel,  and  developed  in  this  connec- 
tion a  method  for  the  arrangement  and  the  maintenance  of  a  breeding 
plat.  In  six  tests  the  shelled  corn  grown  from  seed  selected  for  high 
and  low  protein  and  high  and  low  fat  content  showed  differences 
ranging  in  protein  from  0.50  to  1.25  per  cent  and  in  fat  content  from 
0.67  to  1.45  per  cent.  Investigations  on  the  relation  of  the  size  of 
the  kernel  to  the  percentage  of  protein  or  fat  showed  that  the  weight 
of  kernels  from  24  ears  high  in  protein  averaged  0.372  gram  per  kernel, 
from  16  ears  low  in  protein  0.337  gram  per  kernel:  from  12  ears  high 
in  fat  0.345  gram,  and  from  16  ears  low  in  fat  0.42  gram  per  kernel. 
In  general,  the  tendency  of  corn  high  in  fat  content  was  toward  small 
kernels  and  of  corn  low  in  fat  content  toward  large  kernels.  It  was 
also  found  that  a  high  percentage  of  germ  is  correlated  with  a  high 
fat  content.  These  results  seem  to  show  that  by  proper  selection 
of  seed  the  protein,  fat,  or  carbohydrates  of  corn  may  be  increased 
or  decreased. 

Together  with  the  chemical  composition  of  the  kernel  its  physical 
composition  was  also  studied.  The  different  parts  which  go  to  make 
up  the  physical  composition  of  the  kernel,  as  worked  out  by  the 
Illinois  station,  are  the  tip-cap.  hull,  horny  gluten,  horny  starch, 
white  starch,  and  germ.  The  tip-cap  covers  the  tip  or  base  of  the 
kernel,  by  which  it  is  attached  to  the  cob,  and  comprises  about  1.5 
per  cent  of  the  grain,  and  the  hull  is  the  very  thin  outer  coat,  consti- 
tuting about  6  per  cent  of  the  kernel  and  containing  a  smaller  per- 
centage of  protein  than  any  other  part  of  it.  The  horny  gluten,  lying 
immediately  under  the  hull,  comprises  from  8  to  14  per  cent  of  the 
grain,  and  is  more  abundant  in  the  kernels  with  high  protein  content. 
It  contains  from  20  to  25  per  cent  of  protein  and  is  the  richest  in 
this  substance  of  all  the  parts  of  the  kernel.  The  horny  starch  is  the 
chief  substance  in  the  sides  and  back  of  the  kernel,  making  up  about 
45  per  cent  of  ordinary  corn.  In  high-protein  corn  the  percentage 
of  this  substance  is  much  higher  and  in  low-protein  corn  much  lower 
than  45  per  cent.  This  part  of  the  kernel  is  rich  in  starch  and,  while 
containing  only  about  10  per  cent  of  protein,  it  furnishes  a  greater 
total  amount  than  any  other  part,  because  it  constitutes  a  larger  pro- 
portion of  the  entire  gram.  The  white  starch,  occupying  the  center 
of  the  crown  end  of  the  kernel  and  usually  partially  surrounding  the 
germ,  comprise-  about  25  per  cent  of  the  kernel,  being  less  in  high- 
protein  corn  and  greater  in  low-protein  corn.     It  contains  only  from 


CORX-BSEEDIXG    WORK    AT    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS.  287 

5  to  S  per  cent  of  protein.  The  germ  comprises  about  11  per  cent  of 
the  kernel  and  varies  according  to  the  oil  content,  constituting  a 
higher  proportion  in  high-oil  corn  and  a  smaller  proportion  in  low-oil 
corn.  In  these  investigations  the  oil  in  the  germ  ranged  from  35  to 
40  per  cent  and  from  SO  to  So  per  cent  of  the  total  oil  present.  Corn 
high  in  protein  contains  a  larger  proportion  of  horny  gluten  and  L 
starch  and  a  correspondingly  smaller  proportion  of  white  starch.  In 
corn  of  high  protein  content  the  horny  parts  constitute  about  00 
per  cent  of  the  kernel  and  contain  about  SO  per  cent  of  the  total 
protein. 

Two  strains  of  corn  bred  for  four  years  for  a  high  and  a  low  oil 
content  showed  an  average  difference  of  1.97  per  cent  in  the  oil  con- 
tent and  0.18  per  cent  in  the  protein  content,  or.  in  other  words,  a  very 
high  degree  of  correlation  between  oil  and  protein.  It  is  concluded 
that  as  the  percentage  of  protein  increases  the  starch  decreases  and 
the  oil  content  remains  practically  unchanged,  and  that  the  selection 
of  high-protein  seed  corn  shotdd  be  governed  by  a  high  proportion  of 
germ.  In  a  study  of  four  strains  of  pedigreed  corn,  the  crop  repre- 
senting the  seventh  generation,  the  protein  content  of  low-protein 
ears  varied  from  6.36  to  7.9  per  cent,  with  an  average  of  6.71  per  cent, 
while  the  protein  content  of  the  high-protein  ears  varied  from  1 
to  15.01  per  cent,  with  an  average  of  14.44  per  cent.  The  average 
oil  content  of  the  low-protein  ears  was  4.21  and  of  the  high-protein 
ears  4.93  per  cent.  In  a  further  test  of  the  composition  of  the  kernels 
a  correlation  between  oil  and  protein  was  apparent  only  to  a  small 
degree,  the  high-oil  corn  containing  nearly  three  times  as  much  oil  as 
the  low-oil  corn,  but  being  less  than  one-seventh  richer  in  protein. 
A  very  marked  correlation  between  oil  and  germ  was  shown,  the  low- 
oil  ears  containing  an  average  of  2.52  per  cent  of  oil  and  7.74  per  cent 
of  germ  and  the  high-oil  ears  an  average  of  7  per  cent  of  oil  and  13. S4 
per  cent  of  germ. 

The  effect  of  breeding  in  charging  the  composition  of  the  different 
physical  pans  of  the  kernel  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  the  germs  from 
the  low-oil  corn  contained  about  25  per  cent  of  oil  and  those  from  the 
high-oil  corn  nearly  42  per  cent,  while  the  endosperms  from  the  low- 
protein  ears  contained  less  than  6  per  cent  of  protein  and  those 
from  the  high-protein  ears  nearly  14  per  cent.  Breeding  for  high  or 
low  protein  produced  no  marked  effect  upon  the  ash  content  or  the 
oil  content  of  either  the  germs  or  the  endosperms  and  only  slightly 
influenced  the  protein  content  of  the  germs.  As  calculated  on  the 
basis  of  100  pounds  of  corn,  there  was  a  maximum  difference  of  only 
0.75  pound  of  protein  in  the  germs  from  100  pounds  of  low-protein 
and  high-protein  corn  and  a  difference  of  7.06  pounds  of  protein  in 
the  endosperms. 


2^">  YEARBOOK    OP    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

At  the  North  Dakota  station  corn  selected  for  high  nitrogen  con- 
tent in  1901  gave  in  most  cases  corn  of  high  nitrogen  content  in  1902, 
but  the  crop  of  1903  presented  some  marked  variations.  The  phys- 
ical method  of  selecting  corn  of  a  high  nitrogen  content  was  found 
quite  reliable. 

THE    DEVELOPMENT    Or    TOE    BEEEDIXG    PLAT. 

The  development  of  the  breeding  plat  and  its  introduction  into  prac- 
tical corn  breeding,  aside  from  experimental  work,  mark  an  important 
step  in  the  progress  of  corn  improvement.  The  object  of  the  breeding 
plat  is  to  produce  highly  and  purely  bred  seed  and  to  enable  the 
breeder  to  keep  a  record  showing  the  breeding  of  every  seed  ear 
secured  and  the  productive  capacity  of  each  individual  ear  planted 
in  the  plat.  The  principal  purpose  of  its  location,  arrangement,  and 
management  is  to  prevent  all  foreign  or  outside  pollen,  as  well  as  the 
pollen  from  diseased,  poorly  developed,  or  otherwise  abnormal  plants, 
from  fertilizing  the  blossoms  of  the  seed  plants,  and  also  to  avoid  self- 
pollination  and  close  pollination  within  the  plat.  Corn,  being  a  wind- 
pollinated  plant,  is  with  difficulty  kept  pure  in  breeding,  and  the  first 
followed  in  establishing  a  breeding  plat  was  to  isolate  it  or  to 
locate  it  at  such  a  distance  from  other  growing  corn  plats  (a  quarter 
of  a  mile  if  possible  and  preferably  in  the  direction  opposite  to  the 
prevailing  winds'  as  to  make  it  only  a  remote  possibility  that  outside 
pollen  would  be  carried  into  the  plat  by  the  wind  and  thus  blossoms 
of  one  variety  be  fertilized  with  the  pollen  of  another. 

The  fact  that  individual  ears  similar  in  appearance  and  scoring 
equally  high  may  still  show  great  differences  in  yields  was  early 
recognized,  and  led  to  establishing  the  performam-e  record  of  each 
ear  and  the  selection  of  seed  from  only  those  ears  showing  the  greatest 
vielding  power.  The  most  practical,  if  not  the  only,  method  of  com- 
paring the  productiveness  of  individual  ears  is  the  parallel-row  system 
advocated  by  the  stations  generally.  The  first  recommendation  for 
the  arranging  of  the  breeding  plat  with  these  points  in  view  made  by 
the  Illinois  experiment  station  was  to  the  effect  that  40  selected  ears 
be  planted  in  40  separate  parallel  rows,  one  ear  to  a  row.  the  rows 
being  long  enough  to  require  each  about  three-fourths  of  an  ear  for 
planting  them.  It  was  also  advised  to  plant  the  very  best  seed  ears  in 
the  middle  rows,  grading  them  uniformly  to  either  side,  so  that  the  least 
desirable  ears  might  be  planted  in  the  outside  rows,  and  to  shell  the 
remainder  of  the  corn  from  all  of  the  40  ears  and  use  it  for  planting 
several  rows  entirely  around  the  breeding  plat  to  give  additional 
protection,  especially  from  foreign  pollen.  In  this  stage  of  its  develop- 
ment the  breeding  plat  gave  a  comparison  of  the  different  seed  ears, 
showing  their  individuality,  and  by  isolation  reserved  the  fertilization 


CORN-BREEDING    WORK    AT    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS.  289 

of  the  blossoms  to  the  pollen  produced  within  the  plat.  This  arrange- 
ment, however,  did  not  preclude  either  self  or  close  pollination. 

In  the  experience  of  the  stations,  removing  the  tassels  from  corn 
plants  can  truly  be  said  to  be  of  benefit  only  in  breeding  work,  where 
it  is  applied  in  the  prevention  of  self-pollination  or  the  transfer  of 
pollen  from  the  tassel  to  the  silks  of  the  same  plant.  As  demon- 
strated by  the  Illinois  station,  it  is  possible  for  inbreeding  to  take- 
place  in  the  field,  because  the  plant  sheds  part  of  its  pollen  at  a  time 
when  some  of  its  own  silk  is  already  matured  and  in  a  receptive  condi- 
tion. In  order  to  prevent  inbreeding  in  connection  with  the  parallel- 
row  system  of  planting,  this  institution  practices  and  recommends 
detasseling  every  other  row  before  the  pollen  matures  and  selecting 
seed  from  the  detasseled  rows  only.  This  makes  sires  of  the  plants 
in  the  tasseled  rows  and  dams  of  those  in  the  detasseled  rows  and 
positively  prevents  self-pollination.  It  also  makes  close  pollination 
or  the  transfer  of  pollen  from  the  tassel  of  one  plant  to  the  silks  of 
another  plant  in  the  same  row  of  dams  impossible,  so  that  the  seed 
selected  is  entirely  cross-bred.  Even  before  the  detasseling  of  the 
entire  alternate  rows  was  practiced  by  the  station,  all  abnormal-^ 
especially  barren  and  otherwise  imperfect — plants  were  detasseled 
before  their  pollen  matured  in  order  to  prevent  the  transmission  of 
their  undesirable  characters. 

The  next  step  taken  by  the  Illinois  station  in  perfecting  the  breed- 
ing plat  was  to  devise  a  method  of  planting  which  would  give  assur- 
ance that  the  seed  of  both  sires  and  dams  is  cross-bred,  and  a  practical 
commercial  system  insuring  cross-breeding  to  the  greatest  possible 
extent  was  worked  out.  In  studying  the  arrangement  of  the  breed- 
ing plat  up  to  this  stage  it  may  be  seen  that  there  still  remains  the 
possibility  of  introducing  related  blood,  as  the  breeding  is  carried  on 
from  year  to  year,  because  the  pedigree  is  established  only  on  the 
female  side,  while  it  is  impossible  to  tell  just  from  what  sire  plant 
the  pollen  came  which  fertilized  the  flowers  of  any  particular  ear. 
As  it  is  most  likely  that  a  row  of  dam  plants  is  fertilized  by  the  pollen 
of  the  rows  of  sires  growing  nearest  to  it,  the  station  concluded  that 
the  breeding  plat  might  be  planted  in  such  a  way  as  to  insure  cross- 
breeding of  plants  not  related  to  each  other,  or,  at  least,  very  remotely 
related.  Based  on  this  idea,  and  with  this  end  in  view,  a  mathemat- 
ical arrangement  of  seed  ears  for  planting  was  worked  out  and  adopted. 

SELECTION    AS    A    FACTOR    IN    CORN    IMPROVEMENT. 

We  have  seen  how  artificial  pollination  may  be  employed  in  corn 

improvement,  but  it  remains  very  evident  that  it  is  really  only  a 

small  factor  when  compared  with  selection,  upon  which  the  great  and 

general  progress  in  corn  breeding  must  be  based,  because  crossing 

3    a  1906 19 


290  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPABTMEXT    OF    AGP.ICULTUEE. 

without  subsequent  selection  can  accomplish  but  little,  and  for  the 
further  reason  that  selection  is  the  more  generally  applicable  of  the 
two  means.  The  farmer  is  already  familiar  with  selection  along  a 
certain  line  and  only  a  wider  application  of  the  principle  is  necessary. 
The  endeavor  of  the  experiment  station  anti  the  agricultural  college 
is  to  teach  him  how  to  apply  it  scientifically  and  practically,  not  only 
with  reference  to  the  ear,  but  also  with  reference  to  the  kernel,  the 
entire  plant,  and  even  the  row. 

Experiment-station  work  has  brought  about  a  marked  change  in  the 
methods  of  selection.  As  already  pointed  out.  the  original  method 
consisted  in  basing  the  selection  upon  the  type  of  ear,  and  great 
progress  in  the  improvement  of  corn  has  been  thus  accomplished, 
but  experiments  conducted  by  many  stations  have  shown  that  even 
carefully  selected  seed  ears,  alike  to  all  outward  appearances,  may 
still  have  a  wide  variation  in  yielding  capacity,  amounting  to  even 
more  than  100  per  cent.  In  fact,  at  the  Nebraska  station  10  seed 
ears  compared  for  this  purpose  ranged  in  yield  from  35.0  to  Sl.G 
bushels,  or  a  difference  of  40  bushels  per  acre.  The  "Wisconsin  station 
in  a  recent  test  found  the  yields  of  different  ears  of  Silver  King  corn 
to  vary  from  14  to  97  bushels  of  shelled  corn  per  acre,  and  the  yields 
of  select  seed  ears  from  Ik  pounds  to  50  pounds  per  ear  of  seed  corn. 
The  difference  in  productiveness  is  not  revealed  by  an  examination  of 
the  ears,  but  must  be  ascertained  by  actual  test,  so  that  the  yields  may 
be  measured.  This  indeterminable  factor  is  called  the  individuality 
and  is  analogous  to  the  individuality  in  animals,  wlrich  also  shows 
itself  in  the  progeny. 

As  in  the  development  of  the  breeding  plat,  selection  has  gone 
through  various  stages.  In  some  of  the  earlier  work  with  corn  the 
station  efforts  were  largely  directed  toward  testing  and  comparing 
varieties  for  the  purpose  of  singling  out  those  best  suited  to  certain 
localities  and  conditions.  This  was  selection  applied  to  the  variety 
as  a  whole,  and  as  a  typical  instance  some  of  the  work  of  the  iuinne- 
sota  station  may  be  cited.  This  station  made  a  selection  of  var 
grown  in  the  State  and  compared  them.  This  collect  ion  was  regarded 
as  i  foundation  stock  from  which  the  best  variety  was  to  be  selected. 
The  varietal  names,  if  any  such  existed,  were  disregarded  and  the 
samples  received  were  simply  indicated  by  a  serial  number.  Of 
these  varieties  and  strains  No.  13  proved  most  promising,  the  distin- 
guishing character  being  a  high  yielding  capacity.  The  variety  was 
tested  for  several  years  and  selected  according  to  scientific  principles 
and  then  disseminated  under  the  name  of  Minnesota  Xo.  13.  At 
present  it  is  grown  quite  extensively  in  southern  Minnesota  and  it 
has  also  been  distributed  in  South  Dakota  by  the  experiment  station 
of  that  State.  The  Wisconsin  station  has  selected  a  .-train  of  this 
variety,  known  as  Wisconsin  Xo.  S.  the  seed  having  been   secured 


CORN-BREEDING    WORK    AT    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS.  291 

from  the  Minnesota  experiment  station,  and  has  used  the  same  as  the 
male  parent  in  breeding  for  earlier  maturity  in  some  of  the  late 
heavy  yielding-  varieties  of  yellow  dent  corn,  in  order  to  make  them 
better  suited  to  Wisconsin  conditions.  While  this  line  of  work  is  of 
the  greatest  value  and  must  be  carried  on  continuously,  selection 
has  been  introduced  to  a  much  greater  extent  in  procuring:  seed 
either  for  the  improvement  of  the  variety  itself  or  for  the  maintenance 
of  its  desirable  characters. 

Formerly  in  seed-corn  selection  only  the  type  of  ear  was  considered, 
but  it  is  now  widely  recognized,  and  the  stations  are  continually 
dwelling  upon  the  point,  that  this  is  not  enough,  but  that  selection 
must  be  applied  to  the  individual  plant  and  to  the  individual  ear  with 
reference  to  its  productiveness.  As  shown  by  station  work,  it  is  the 
performance  record  rather  than  any  particular  point  about  the  ear 
that  forms  a  definite  basis  for  the  selection  of  its  progeny  for  seed. 
Even  the  size  of  the  ear,  which  undoubtedly  was  regarded  as  one  of 
the  principal  and  desirable  features,  and  probably  in  most  cases 
determined  the  selection  of  seed,  can  not  be  relied  upon  as  indicating 
the  best  yielding  qualities.  In  experiments  to  determine  the  relation 
of  size  of  ear  to  yield  the  Nebraska  station  found  that  the  average 
weight  per  ear  of  the  five  highest-yielding  varieties  under  test  was 
0.705  pound,  while  the  average  weight  per  ear  for  all  the  varieties 
was  much  higher.  In  some  cases  large-eared  varieties  were  rather 
low  in  yield,  thus  indicating  that  no  definite  relation  between  the  size 
of  the  ear  and  the  yielding  capacity  exists.  It  was  further  brought 
out  by  cooperative  tests  that  the  size  of  the  yield  varies  with  locality 
and  is  dependent  upon  soil,  climate,  and  elevation,  and  the  data 
secured  showed  plainly  that  for  western  and  central  Nebraska  a 
smaller-eared  type  of  corn  should  be  selected  than  for  the  eastern 
portion  of  the  State. 

The  effect  and  value  of  careful  selection  in  corn  growing  are  shown 
by  the  results  of  numerous  other  experiments  and  are  especially  and 
more  definitely  thrown  into  relief  by  cooperative  work.  In  work 
of  this  kind  by  the  Wisconsin  Experiment  Association  in  1905  with 
Silver  King  corn,  a  variety  which  had  undergone  selection  at  the 
station  for  several  years,  an  average  yield  of  59.2  bushels  per  acre 
was  secured,  while  the  best  of  all  other  not  so  long  and  carefully 
selected  varieties  observed  in  the  comparison  yielded  on  an  average 
10  bushels  less. 

At  the  Wisconsin  experiment  station  the  results  of  corn  breeding 
in  accordance  with  the  plat  system  show  an  increase  in  the  propor- 
tions and  average  yields  of  seed  corn  and  marketable  corn  in  the  crops 
produced.  In  1905  each  row  in  the  breeding  plat  produced  on  an 
average  22. G  pounds  of  seed  corn,  97  pounds  of  marketable  corn,  and 
7.2  pounds  of  nubbins,  and  in  1906,  53.1  pounds  of  seed  corn,  132.8 


292  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

pounds  of  marketable  corn,  and  13  pounds  of  nubbins.  The  average 
yield  per  acre  of  the  plats  in  1906  was  at  the  rate  of  approximately 
75  bushels  per  acre.  The  increase  in  yield  was  in  some  instances 
largely  due  to  soil  and  season,  but  the  increase  in  seed  corn  was 
greater  in  proportion  than  that  of  the  nubbins,  thus  indicating  that 
a  constant  selection  from  the  breeding  plat  will  materially  increase 
productiveness  and  quality.  An  experiment  was  also  made  to  deter- 
mine to  what  extent  the  bearing  qualities  of  different  stalks  would 
be  transmitted  to  the  progeny.  Seed  com  was  selected  from  stalks 
bearing  a  single  large  ear  and  from  stalks  bearing  two  ears.  A  greater 
total  yield  was  secured  where  the  selection  was  made  to  increase  the 
number  of  single  ears  in  the  plat  than  where  it  was  made  to  increase 
the  number  of  double  ears.  Where  two  ears  were  borne  on  a  stalk 
generally  one  or  both  were  small  and  poorly  formed. 

The  Rhode  Island  station  has  pursued  for  several  years  a  somewhat 
similar  line  of  work  with  sweet  corn  by  selecting  the  upper  and  lower 
ear  of  stalks  producing  the  largest  number  of  ears.  This  was  done 
to  ascertain  whether  the  lower  ear  would  increase  lower-ear  produc- 
tion, together  with  the  number  of  ears  on  the  stalk,  as  compared  with 
seed  from  the  upper  ear.  In  1901,  35  per  cent  of  the  plants  bore  more 
than  one  ear  and  in  1905,  90  per  cent  bore  more  than  one  ear,  the 
highest  number  of  ears  from  a  single  plant  being  13.  Although  the 
earlier  results  seemed  to  show  that  the  character  or  the  individuality 
of  the  corn  plant  from  which  the  seed  is  taken  is  of  much  greater 
importance  in  corn  breeding  than  the  position  of  the  ear  on  the  stalk, 
it  was  found  that  selecting  seed  from  the  lower  ear  was  not  so  satis- 
factory as  selecting  it  from  the  upper  ear. 

THE    INFLUENCE    OF    THE    WORK. 

The  corn-breeding  work  of  the  experiment  stations  has  exerted  a 
wide  influence  in  all  corn-growing  sections  of  the  country.  Partly 
through  the  station  publications  and  the  agricultural  press  and  partly 
through  the  activities  of  agricultural  college  extension  forces,  in  coop- 
eration with  station  workers,  the  farmers'  institutes,  the  corn-growers' 
associations,  and  other  similar  factors,  the  results  of  this  work  are 
presented  to  the  farmer  and  every  effort  is  made  to  induce  him  to 
apply  the  principles  demonstrated  as  advantageous  and  profitable. 
Every  gathering  at  which  the  value  of  highly  bred  corn  is  discussed 
reflects  the  interest  of  the  farming  population  in  the  subject  and  indi- 
cates the  confidence  placed  in  the  station  results  and  recommenda- 
tions. Progress  is  most  rapid  when  the  individual  farmer  understands 
all  the  essential  features  of  the  work,  but  such  a  degree  of  efficiency  is 
most  readily  reached  through  cooperation  with  the  stations  and  such 
mutual  assistance  as  the  farmers  themselves  are  able  to  give  to  each 
other. 


CORN-BREEDING    WORK    AT    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS.  293 

Associations  organized  for  the  purpose  of  producing  highly  bred 
seed  corn  are  doing  good  work  in  a  number  of  States,  prominent  among 
them  being  Illinois,  Iowa,  Indiana,  Kansas,  Nebraska,  and  Missouri. 
In  1900,  only  about  four  years  after  the  Illinois  station  inaugurated  its 
corn-improvement  work,  the  first  seed-corn  growers'  organization, 
under  the  name  of  the  Illinois  Seed  Corn  Breeders'  Association,  was 
formed  and  the  methods  of  corn  breeding  advised  by  the  station  were 
put  into  use  throughout  the  State.  As  an  example  of  different  lines 
of  endeavor  of  such  associations  the  work  of  the  Kansas  Corn  Breeders' 
Association  may  be  cited.  This  organization  endeavors  to  establish 
improved  types  and  strains  of  corn  meeting  the  needs  of  different  sec- 
tions of  the  State,  to  stimulate  and  to  promote  the  growing  of  pure 
seed  corn  within  the  State,  to  furnish  means  bj"  which  valuable  native 
strains  showing  purity  of  breeding  maybe  recognized  as  pure  bred,  to 
establish  a  bureau  of  inspection  with  authority  to  give  certificates  of 
type  and  breeding  for  corn  grown  by  breeders,  to  furnish  information 
on  seed  corn  to  farmers  and  purchasers  for  their  convenience  and  pro- 
tection, to  aid  in  enacting  legislation  protecting  the  grower  of  pure-bred 
seed  corn,  to  establish  a  score  card  or  standard  of  perfection  for  each 
recognized  breed  of  corn,  and  to  further  in  every  way  the  interests  of 
corn  culture.  Corn  maybe  recognized  as  pure  bred  by  a  vote  of  the 
association  when  it  has  been  bred  and  selected  by  itself  for  five  years 
or  more  and  the  proper  association  authorities  have  inspected  and 
examined  the  corn  in  the  locality  in  which  it  is  grown  and  have  recom- 
mended to  the  association  that  such  corn  be  recognized  as  a  pure-bred 
corn.  In  addition  to  these  stipulations  the  breeder  is  required  to 
bring  a  bushel  of  selected  ears  of  the  particular  variety  to  the  meeting 
of  the  association  in  which  the  vote  is  cast  and  to  give  a  detailed 
description,  including  the  history  of  its  breeding  and  its  production. 

Another  plan  of  cooperation  followed  in  some  localities  consists  in 
the  production  of  seed  corn  by  one  of  a  group  of  neighbors  whose  farm 
is  suitably  located  and  presents  average  soil  conditions.  This  farmer 
plants  the  best  variety  for  the  locality,  as  previously  determined,  and 
grows  a  crop  under  approved  methods  of  corn  improvement  and  cul- 
ture, with  the  understanding  that  the  other  parties  to  the  agreement 
will  buy  the  seed  corn  produced  at  a  stipulated  price.  In  the  work  of 
continuous  improvement  and  the  maintenance  of  a  high  standard  of 
production  throughout  the  entire  country  all  associations  of  corn 
growers  and  corn  breeders  are  a  most  important  and  helpful  factor. 

Our  farm  lands  are  steadily  increasing  in  value,  and  in  view  of  this 
condition,  together  with  the  fact  that  American  agricultural  labor 
should  always  be  well  paid,  we  must  obtain  greater  yields  from  the 
same  areas  without  very  materially  increasing  the  cost  of  production 
in  order  to  get  the  proper  return  on  the  money  invested  in  our  farms. 
This  result  may  be  achieved  in  corn  culture  by  the  use  of  higher 


294  YEARBOOK    OF    THE   DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

and  better  bred  varieties,  as  no  greater  expense  is  involved  in  grow- 
ing a  variety  ranking  high  in  yield  and  quality  than  in  growing  an 
inferior  one. 

The  experiments  showing  the  value  of  a  full  stand  of  healthy  plants 
grown  from  strong  and  vigorous  seed,  the  inquiries  into  the  effects  of 
detasseling,  the  observations  on  the  mixing  of  different  t}Tpes  and 
varieties,  the  investigations  in  crossing,  the  studies  of  the  chemical 
composition  of  the  kernel,  and  similar  lines  of  work  constitute  the  pre- 
liminary measures  which  led  to  the  establishment  of  the  breeding  plat, 
with  its  superior  facilities  for  comparing  the  yielding  power  of  indi- 
vidual ears,  insuring  cross-pollination  and  pure  breeding,  and  estab- 
lishing a  pedigree  of  seed  ears.  The  data  derived  from  all  the  different 
lines  of  corn  improvement  by  the  experiment  stations  have  been  S3^s- 
tematically  and  scientific  ally  grouped  by  these  same  institutions  and 
are  now  presented  to  the  farmer  and  the  commercial  seed-corn  grower 
as  a  harmonious  whole  in  the  form  of  a  complete  and  practical  system 
of  corn  breeding  for  the  improvement  of  the  corn  plant  in  both  yield 
and  quality  and  for  the  maintenance  of  a  high  standard  of  excellence. 


NUTS  AND  THEIR  USES  AS  FOOD. 

By  M.  E.  Jaffa. 
Assistant  Professor  of  Nutrition,  University  of  California. 

IXTRODUCTIOX". 

The  constantly  increasing  consumption  of  nuts  throughout  the 
United  States  augurs  well  for  a  better  appreciation  of  their  food 
value.  The  time  when  nuts  were  considered  merely  as  a  luxury,  or 
as  something  to  be  eaten  out  of  hand  at  odd  times,  is  rapidly  passing 
away.  In  earlier  days  the  native  hickories,  butternuts,  walnuts,  chest- 
nuts, and  many  other  nuts  found  in  the  United  States  were  to  be  had 
in  country  regions  for  the  gathering  and  were  of  no  commercial  impor- 
tance. On  the  other  hand,  the  English  walnuts  (to  give  them  their 
most  common  name),  almonds,  cocoanuts,  etc.,  brought  from  other 
countries,  were  relatively  expensive  luxuries.  Conditions  have  mate- 
rially changed  and  our  principal  native  nuts  are  now  staple  market 
commodities  and  bring  good  prices.  At  the  same  time,  owing  to 
changes  in  market  conditions,  the  price  of  the  imported  nuts  has 
dropped  so  that  they  are  well  within  the  reach  of  the  majority. 

Some  nuts,  like  the  native  hazelnut  and  beechnut,  have  practically 
no  commercial  value  and,  though  palatable,  are  almost  never  offered 
for  sale,  doubtless  because  they  are  so  small  and  difficult  to  gather  in 
quantity.  The  chinquapin,  a  small  nut  allied  to  the  chestnut,  finds 
a  limited  sale  in  southern  cities,  but  is  seldom  seen  in  other  markets. 
From  available  statistics  it  appears  that  in  1905  the  total  quantity 
of  almonds,  cocoanuts,  Brazil  nuts,  filberts,  peanuts,  walnuts,  and  other 
nuts,  shelled  and  unslielled,  imported  into  the  United  States  was.  in 
round  numbers,  86,238,000  pounds,  with  a  value  of  86,138,000.  In 
1905  the  total  almond  crop  in  California  reached  4,200,000  pounds 
and  the  walnut  crop  12,800,000  pounds.  The  richest  yield  of  peanuts 
was  reported  from  the  Southern  States,  chiefly  Virginia,  Georgia,  and 
Tennessee,  and  amounted  to  225,000,000  pounds. 

The  total  quantity  of  home-grown  nuts,  including  both  native  and 
cultivated  varieties,  must  far  exceed  the  quantities  imported,  but  in 
the  nature  of  the  case  no  estimates  of  the  total  quantities  gathered 
and  eaten  are  procurable.  When  we  consider  the  constantly  increasing 
demand  for  nuts  and  the  large  quantity  which  we  import  the  p. 
bilities  of  the  industry  for  the  American  nut  grower  are  obvious. 

As  the  use  of  nuts  lias  increased,  many  persons  have  turned  their 
attention  to  the  growing  of  native  and  foreign  nuts  on  a  commercial 


296  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

scale.  This  work  has  been  forwarded  by  the  Department  of  Agri- 
culture, through  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry,  and  by  the  Califor- 
nia. Florida,  Michigan,  and  other  agricultural  experiment  stations. 
With  nuts,  as  with  other  crops,  it  has  been  found  that,  by  selection 
and  breeding,  improved  varieties  are  obtainable,  of  larger  size,  bet- 
ter flavor,  thinner  shells,  or  other  desirable  characteristics.  The 
increased  demand  for  nuts  is  due  in  the  main  to  two  causes,  namely, 
a  better  appreciation  of  their  appetizing  qualities  and  the  numerous 
ways  in  which  they  form  a  palatable  addition  to  the  diet  of  the 
average  family,  and,  secondly,  to  then  use  by  the  vegetarians  and 
persons  of  similar  belief — a  group  small  in  proportion  to  the  total 
population,  but  still  fairly  large  numerically — who  use  nuts,  and 
more  particularly  the  peanut,  as  a  substitute  for  meat  and  other 
nitrogenous  and  fatty  foods. 

Many  special  nut  foods,  such  as  malted  nuts,  meat  substitutes,  etc.. 
have  been  devised  and  extensively  advertised  by  the  manufacturers 
for  general  use  in  the  diet  and  for  the  special  needs  of  vegetarians  and 
fruitarians.  It  is  said  that  some  of  these  American  nut  products  con- 
tain soy  beans,  but  apparently  the  peanut  plays  a  very  important  part 
in  their  composition.  In  either  case,  since  the  peanut,  like  the  soy 
bean,  is  a  legume,  these  preparations  might  more  properly  be  compared 
with  the  bean  cheese  and  other  soy-bean  products  so  much  used  in 
China,  Japan,  and  other  eastern  countries  than  with  such  nuts  as 
the  walnut,  almond,  or  cocoanut. 

DESCRIPTION    OF    NUTS. 

The  term  "nut"  is  not  a  definite  one  botanically  speaking,  but  is 
applied  indiscriminately  to  a  variety  of  certain  fruits  or  parts  of 
fruits  and  implies  a  more  or  less  hard,  woody  covering  surrounding  a 
meat  or  kernel.  The  most  diverse  plant  groups  contribute  to  our  nut 
supply,  many  of  the  nuts  being  the  product  of  our  beech,  chestnut, 
walnut,  and  other  deciduous  trees  and  bushes,  some  of  pines  and 
tropical  palms,  and  others,  like  the  peanut  and  pistache  or  pistachio, 
being  the  fruit,  respectively,  of  a  vine-like  plant  and  a  small  tree, 
both  belonging  to  the  family  of  legumes.  Still  another,  the  water 
chestnut,  is  supplied  by  a  water  plant. 

Most  of  the  native  and  foreign  nuts  winch  we  use  are  too  familiar 
to  need  description.     Several,  however,  are  not  so  generally  known. 

Pinenuts,  which  grow  in  the  cones  of  a  number  of  varieties  of  native 
and  foreign  pines,  are  now  fairly  common  in  our  markets.  The 
Indians  have  always  known  and  appreciated  them  and  have  passed 
<m  their  knowledge  to  the  white  race.  Then,  too,  many  immigrants 
who  came  to  this  country  knew  the  pinenut.  for  it  lias  long  been  much 
eaten  in  Italy  and  other  parts  of  southern  Europe,  where  there  are  a 
number  of  nut-yielding  pines.     The  small,  rather  pointed  white  nuts 


NUTS    AND    THEIR    USES    AS    FOOD.  297 

are  usually  marketed  shelled;  but  as  they  grow  are  covered  with  a  more 
or  less  hard,  woody  shell.  The  pistaehe  nut  (now  grown  in  California) 
has  long  been  used  and  is  prized  by  confectioners  for  its  delicate 
flavor  and  attractive  green  color,  yet  it  is  by  no  means  common. 
The  nuts  are  small,  not  unlike  a  bean  in  size  and  shape,  though  more 
pointed,  and  before  marketing  are  freed  from  the  pods  in  which  they 
grow.  The  individual  nuts  are  covered  with  a  gray  or  purplish  skin, 
and  are  blanched  before  they  are  used. 

The  so-called  lichi  nut,  which  is  really  a  dried  fruit  surrounded  by 
a  nut-like  shell  and  not  unlike  a  raisin  in  flavor,  is  a  favorite  in 
China  and  has  become  quite  common  in  this  country.  The  ginkgo 
nut,  the  fruit  of  an  ornamental  tree  quite  widely  grown  in  the  United 
States  and  sometimes  called  the  maidenhair  tree  from  the  shape  of 
the  leaves,  and  which  fruits  abundantly  in  some  regions,  is  seldom 
eaten  except  by  the  Chinese,  who  gather  it  whenever  possible.  The 
small,  roundish,  oval,  thin-shelled  nut  is  surrounded  by  a  very  acrid. 
bad-smelling  pulp,  the  whole  fruit  being  not  unlike  a  green  damson 
plum  in  size  and  appearance.  In  China.  Korea,  and  other  parts  of 
the  Orient  this  nut  is  much  used  as  a  food,  and,  so  far  as  can  be 
learned,  is  always  cooked  in  some  way.  Roasted  like  a  peanut,  it  is 
palatable.  The  ginkgo  nuts  are  on  sale  in  the  Chinese  shops  in  San 
Francisco  and  doubtless  in  other  cities,  and  were  studied  at  the  Cali- 
fornia experiment  station  some  years  ago.  together  with  other  Chinese 
foods. 

The  water  chestnut,  or  horn  chestnut  (T/npa  bispinosa),  an  aquatic 
plant,  produces  a  seed  or  "nut"  which  somewhat  resembles  two 
curved  horns  united  in  one,  the  kernel  of  which  is  largely  used  as  a 
food  by  the  inhabitants  of  Asiatic  countries.  This  so-called  nut 
is  also  on  sale  in  the  United  States,  but  chiefly  in  Chinese  shops. 
Another  water  plant  (Eltocluiris  tuberosa)  is  also  known  as  the 
water  chestnut,  but  in  this  case  it  is  the  conn  or  bulb  that  is  eaten.  It 
is  not  unlike  a  chestnut  in  shape,  and  has  a  tough,  brown  skin.  This 
is  grown  in  Asia,  but  is  imported  by  the  Chinese  in  this  country.  A 
three-cornered  pointed  nut  or  seed,  the  pit  of  the  Chinese  olive 
(Canarium  sp. ),  is  also  on  sale  at  Chinese  shops  in  the  United  States. 
The  kernels  are  oily  but  palatable,  and  are  used  in  Java  for  making 
a  nut  milk  much  thought  Gf  for  infant  feeding:. 

The  chufa,  nut  grass,  or  earth  almond  is  a  small  tuberous  root  of  a 
sedgelike  plant  and  perhaps  should  be  classed  with  the  vegetables 
rather  than  with  nuts.     It  is  not  common,  though  sometimes  eaten. 

From  time  to  time  new  nuts  make  their  appearance  on  the  market 
as  some  nut  prized  locally  becomes  known  to  the  trade.  A  nut  which 
seems  to  be  growing  in  popularity,  though  still  uncommon,  is  the  Par- 
adise nut  of  South  America,  which  resembles  a  Brazil  nut  in  appear- 
ance and  flavor.     Still  less  common  is  the  South  African  cream  nut, 


298  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

though  it  is  sometimes  shipped  to  this  country.  The  choicest  member 
of  the  Brazil-nut  group  is  the  true  "butternut "  of  the  Tropics,  which 
is  very  seldom  found  outside  that  region.  Its  flavor  is  very  delicate 
and  delicious,  but  it  does  not  keep  well :  and  even  if  it  would  bear  ship- 
ment successfully,  the  available  supply  is  at  present  very  small.  The 
cashew  nut  of  tropical  regions,  which  many  consider  one  of  the  most 
delicious  nuts  grown,  has  long  been  known,  but  has  never  become  com- 
mon. It  is  sold  to  some  extent  and  brings  high  prices.  This  nut  is 
roasted  before  it  is  eaten,  as  the  raw  nut  contains  poisonous  properties 
winch  are  readily  destroyed  by  heat. 

The  oval.  flat,  and  rather  large  seeds  of  a  pumpkin-like  fruit,  tabe- 
buia  (Ttlfairia  pedata),  from  Zanzibar,  which  has  been  grown  in  a 
limited  way  at  the  Porto  Rico  experiment  station,  are  roasted  and 
eaten  like  a  nut.  The  flavor  is  oily  and  fairly  palatable.  This  sug- 
gests the  use  in  Russia  of  the  raw  sunflower  seed,  which  is  rich  in  oil 
ami  not  unlike  some  of  the  common  nuts  in  composition.  The  seeds 
are  eaten  out  of  hand  at  ail  times  and  by  all  classes. 

THE    FLAVOR    OF    NUTS. 

The  flavor  of  nuts  is  very  largely  dependent  upon  the  oils  which 
thev  contain,  though  in  some  there  are  also  specific  flavoring  bodies. 
The  nut  oils  readily  become  rancid,  the  very  disagreeable  flavor  of 
spoiled  nuts  being  due  to  this  property.  Some  nuts,  for  instance,  the 
chestnut,  have  a  starchy  flavor  as  well  as  a  "nutty"  taste.  The 
small  native  nut  is  much  more  highly  flavored  than  the  large  Italian  or 
the  Japanese  chestnut.  The  almond  possesses  the  cyanic-acid  flavor, 
which  is  characteristic  of  peach  pits,  plum  pits,  etc..  and  this  might  be 
expected  when  it  is  remembered  that  the  almond  is  the  dried  pit  of  an 
inedible  fruit  somewhat  resembling  the  peach  in  appearance  and 
lv  related  to  it  botanicallv.  Most  almonds  are  mild  flavored, 
though  in  the  so-called  bitter  almonds  the  cyanic-acid  yielding  glucosid 
is  more  abundant.  In  raw  peanuts  there  is  a  decided  flavor  resem- 
bling that  of  the  closely  related  beans  and  peas,  and  to  some  persons 
tins  is  not  unpalatable.  In  the  roasted  peanut,  winch  most  of  us 
prefer  to  the  raw.  the  flavor  is  largely  dependent  upon  the  browned 
oil-  and  starches  or  other  carbohydrates. 

MLPOSmON    OF    NUTS. 

The  composition  of  nuts  and  nut  products  has  been  studied  at  a 
number  of  the  agricultural  experiment  stations,  notably  California, 
Maine,  and  Iowa,  and  the  table  on  the  following  page  summarizes  the 
results  of  tins  work,  the  American  data  being  supplemented  in  a 
number  of  cases  by  the  results  of  European  analyses.  For  purposes 
of  comparison  several  other  common  food  materials  are  also  included. 


NUTS    AND    TKEIK    USES    AS    FOOD. 


299 


Avmyc  composition  of  nuts  and  nut  products. 


Kind  of  food. 


Refuse. 


Edible  portion. 


Water. 


Pro- 
tein. 


Carbohy- 
drates. 


Fat. 


Sugar, 

starch. 

etc. 


Crude 
fiber. 


Fuel 

value  per 
pound. 


Nuts  and  nut  products:  Per  efc 

Acorn,  fresh 17. 80 

Almond H.W 

Beechnut [    30.  90 

B  ra  zil  nut 49.  3.3 

Butternut 80.  40 

Candle  nut 

Chestnut,  fresh 

Chestnut,  dry 23.  40 

Horn  chestnut  or  water  chest- 
nut   

Chut'a  (earth  almond) 

Cocoanut 34.  06 

Filbert 52.68 

Ginkgo  nut  (seeds) 

Hickory  nut 02.  20 

Lichi  nut 41. 00 

Paradise  nut 4-3.  70 

Peanut 27. 04 

Pecan 50. 10 

Pignolia  (shelled) 

Pistachio 

"Walnut 

Almond  butter 

Almond  paste 

Peanut  butter 

Malted  nuts 

Cocoanut  candy 

Peanut  candy 

Chestnuts,  preserved  (marron 
glace) ,  air  dried 


Walnuts  preserved  in  sirup, 
air  dried 


58.80 


Cocoanut  milk 

Cocoanut,  desiccated 

Peanut  coffee  made  from  en- 


tire kernel 

Chestnut  flour 

Cocoanut  flour 

Hazelnut  meal 

Other  foods  for  comparison: 

Moat,  round  steak 

Cheese,  Cheddar 

Eggs,  boiled 

Wheat  flour,  high  grade . 

White  bread 

Beans,  dried 

Potatoes 

Apples 

Raisins 


20.00 
2.3.00 
10.00 


Per  ct. 

34.7 
4.9 
0.6 
4.7 
4.5 
5.9 

43.4 
6.1 

10.6 
2.2 

13.0 
5.4 

47.3 
3.7 

16.4 
2.3 
7.-4 
3.4 
6.2 
4.2 
3.4 
2.  2 

24.2 
2.1 
2.0 
3.9 
3.0 

IS.  2 

16.9 

92.7 

3.5 

5.1 
7.8 
14.4 
2.7 

65.5 
27.4 
65.0 
12.0 
35.3 
12.  6 
75.  3 
84.6 
14.0 


Per  ct. 

4.4 
21.4 
21.8 
17.4 
27.9 
21.4 

6.4 
10.7 

10.9 
3.5 

6.6 
10.5 

5.9 
15.4 

2.9 
22.2 
29.  S 
12.1 
33.9 
22.0 
IS.  2 
21.7 
13.1 
29.3 
23.7 

2.  4 
10.3 

1.3 


Per  ct. 

4.7 

54.4 

49.9 

65.0 

61.2 

01.7 

6.0 

7.S 

.7 
31.6 
56.2 
61.0 

.8 
67.4 

.8 
62.6 
43.5 
70.7 
48.2 
54.  5 
60.7 
61.5 
23.9 
46.5 
27.  i 
11.9 
16.6 

.  5 


13.  §  ;      20. 0 

.1  1. 5 

0.  3         57.  4 


27.9 
4.0 

20.6 
11.7 

19.8 
27.7 
12.4 
11.4 

9.2 
22.  5 

2.2 
.4 

2.0 


50.1 

3.4 
2.1 
05.0 

13.6 

36.8 

10.7 

1.0 

1.3 

1.8 

.1 

.5 

3.3 


Per  ct. 
50.4 
13.8 

18.0 
5.7  [ 

3.4 
4.9 
41.3 
70.1 

73.8 
50.2 
13.7 


Per  ct. 
4.2 
3.0 

3.9 


l.o 
2.9 

1.4 
10.5 
8.9 


11.7 


43.1 

.9 

11.4 

78.0 

10.2 

14.7 

2.4 

8.5 

3.7 

6.5 

1.4 

i: 

.6 

29.4 


17.1 
43.9 


66.9 


4.5 
2.1 


79.7 

I 
48.6 

4.6 

31.5 

12.  3  J        2.  4 

80.8 
45.9  |       10.1 

17.8 


74.8 
52.6 
85.  2 
15.0 
13.0 
73.6 


.3 
.5 
4.4 
.4 
1.2 
2.5 


Per  ct. 
1.6 
2.5 
3.7 
3.3 
3.0 
3.3 
1.4 
2.4 

2.6 
2.0 
1.6 
2.4 
2.0 
2.1 
1.9 
2.7 
2.2 
1.6 
3.8 
3.1 
1.7 
3.0 
1.6 
5.0 
2.2 
.0 
1.1 


1.3 

2.  2 
3.4 
0.9 
2.2 

1.1 
4.0 
.  7 
.5 
1.1 
3.5 
1.0 
.3 
3.4 


Calories. 
1,265 
2,895 
2,740 
3,120 
3,370 
3,020 
1,140 
1, 840 


3UU  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Refuse,  mostly  shell,  constitutes  a  considerable  proportion  of  the 
nuts  as  purchased,  varying  greatly  with  the  different  kinds.  With 
fresh  chestnuts  the  proportion  is  nearly  16  per  cent,  peanuts  27  per 
cent,  almonds  47  per  cent,  and  butternuts  86  per  cent. 

The  edible  portion  of  nuts,  with  few  exceptions,  is  very  concentrated 
food,  containing  little  water  and  much  fat.  In  general,  nuts  are  also 
rich  in  protein.  Those  ranking  highest  in  this  nutrient,  the  pignolia, 
a  variety  of  pinenut  imported  from  Spain,  with  33.9  per  cent,  the  pea- 
nut with  29.8  per  cent,  and  the  butternut  with  27.9  per  cent  protein, 
surpass  most  ordinary  animal  or  vegetable  foods  in  this  respect.  The 
almond,  beechnut,  and  pistachio,  with  21.4  per  cent,  21.8  per  cent,  and 
22.6  per  cent,  respectively,  compare  favorably  with  dried  legumes. 
The  Brazil  nut  contains  17.4  per  cent  protein,  the  filbert  16.5  per  cent, 
the  walnut  IS. 2  per  cent,  the  hickory  nut  15.4  per  cent,  the  pinenut 
14.8  per  cent,  the  pecan  12.1  per  cent,  and  the  dry  chestnut  but  10.7 
per  cent.  The  dry  acorn,  fresh  chestnut,  and  cocoanut,  with,  respec- 
tively, 6.4,  6.4,  and  6.6  per  cent,  are  not  as  rich  in  protein  as  bread. 


:■—£=     2  5^-1      .      ^t\y     V\  yC r^^ 59°fo  WATER 

FROTE.W  /66  <%>' '     l~   "    .-    ;  ;■      £•       \  /r; '"^NT~~    107  °f>  RROTEIN 

FAT  634  <%, 1-  ■    I   lmffl^\     \  f/'  "°?V  ""-    70°t>   FAT 

STARCH.SUGARETC    IZ.S^c*.     V       \l  JL-' £->!.  v  /  tj  ~^\ — 715  %  STARCH SUSARETC. 

CRUDE  FIBER     26%-.^  \^.-\I'-\  ./  '%^27°?0  CRUDE  FIBER 

ASH     1 4  fy^S^C~~5\-%U  \n'- .'Jt'"22  ^'   ASH 

WALMJT.  CHESTVJT. 

Fig.  8.— Percentage  composition  of  an  oily  nut  (walnut)  and  a  starchy  nut  (chestn     ;. 

Of  the  nuts  here  included  the  richest  in  fat  is  the  pecan,  with  an 
average  of  70.7  per  cent,  but  7  other  varieties — the  Brazil  nut,  butter- 
nut, candlenut,  filbert,  hickory  nut,  pinenut,  and  walnut — contain 
upward  of  60  per  cent.  The  almond,  cocoanut,  and  pistachio  yield 
between  50  and  60  per  cent  of  this  nutrient.  The  beechnut,  peanut, 
and  pignolia  contain  about  50  per  cent.  In  other  words,  in  13  of  the 
varieties  of  nuts  appearing  in  the  foregoing  table,  half  or  more  of  the 
edible  portion  is  fat  or  oil. 

Only  a  few  of  the  commonly  used  nuts  yield  any  notable  amounts  of 
total  carbohydrate  matter,  the  dry  chestnut,  with  73  per  cent,  rating 
highest.  Beechnuts,  pinenuts,  and  peanuts  have  about  IS  per  cent. 
The  quantity  of  starch  found  is,  with  some  exceptions,  quite  small, 
ranging  from  3  per  cent  in  the  beechnut  to  27  per  cent  in  the  chestnut. 

Figure  8  shows  in  diagrammatic  form  the  percentage  composition 
of  an  oily  nut,  the  walnut,  and  a  starchy  nut,  the  chestnut. 

Xuts  are,  comparatively  speaking,  well  supplied  with  mineral  mat- 
ter, this  constituent  in  the  majority  of  nuts  exceeding  2  per  cent. 
The  ash  of  the  walnut,  almond,  etc.,  is  rich  in  phosphoric  acid,  and 


NUTS    .VXD    THEIR    USES   AS    FOOD.  301 

in  this  regard  compares  favorably  with  that  of  cereals.  It  would 
appear  from  the  data  on  the  digestibility  of  nuts  that  the  mineral 
matter  is  as  well  assimilated  as  that  from  other  common  foods. 

DIGESTIBILITY    OF    XUTS. 

With  the  exception,  perhaps,  of  dried  beans  and  cheese,  no  food 
material  has  the  reputation  for  indigestibility  that  has  been  accorded 
to  nuts.  Discomfort  from  them  is  largely  due  to  insufficient  mastica- 
tion ami  to  the  fact  that  nuts  are  often  eaten  when  not  needed,  as  after 
a  hearty  meal  or  late  at  night,  though  it  is  undoubtedly  true  that  nut 
protein  as  ordinarily  eaten  is  not  so  easily  or  so  completely  digested  as 
meat  protein.  Very  likely  the  concentration  of  nuts,  with  but  3  to  5 
per  cent  water,  as  compared  with  meats  containing  from  50  to  70  per 
cent  water,  is  a  contributing  cause.  If  careful  consideration  were 
given  to  this  matter  and  if  attention  were  paid  to  the  proper  use  of 
nuts  and  their  correct  place  in  the  diet,  there  would  be  less  unfavor- 
able comment  on  their  digestibility. 

The  results  of  investigations  carried  on  with  fruit  and  nut  diets  at 
the  California  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  afford  tentative  con- 
clusions regarding  thoroughness  of  digestion  which  should  be  of  value 
to  those  who  wish  to  use  nuts  as  a  staple  article  of  food  rather  than  as 
an  occasional  article  of  diet.  This  work  has  comprised  15  dietary 
studies  and  about  100  digestion  experiments  with  elderly  men,  young 
men,  women,  and  children,  of  whom  some  had  been  vegetarians  for 
years,  and  some  had  even  limited  their  diet  almost  exclusively  to  fruit 
and  nuts;  others  had  previously  lived  on  the  usual  mixed  diet.  The 
average  coefficients  of  digestibility  reported  for  28  experiments  with 
2  men  and  1  woman  were:  Protein,  90  per  cent;  fat,  S5  per  cent; 
sugar,  starch,  etc.,  96  per  cent:  crude  fiber,  54  per  cent;  and  ash,  68 
per  cent,  with  86  per  cent  of  the  energy  available.  The  correspond- 
ing figures  for  three  experiments  with  the  same  subjects  in  which  no 
fruit  or  nuts  were  used  are:  Protein,  94  per  cent;  fat,  92  per  cent; 
sugar,  starch,  etc.,  96  per  cent;  crude  fiber,  49  per  cent,  with  88  per 
cent  of  the  energy  available.  The  latter  coefficients  agree  very  closely 
with  those  in  the  average  of  nearly  500  experiments  with  different 
sorts  of  mixed  diet,  namely :  Protein,  92  per  cent ;  fat,  95  per  cent ;  and 
carbohydrates,  97  per  cent.  In  view  of  these  facts  regarding  compo- 
sition and  digestibilit}'  of  their  diet,  it  is  evident  that  nuts  must  be 
regarded  as  the  main  source  of  protein  forthe  fruitarians.  The  studies 
with  fruitarians  have  all  indicated  that  nut  protein  is  fairly  well  assimi- 
lated ;  and  that  this  is  true  with  the  average  healthy  person  is  well  illus- 
trated by  an  experiment  with  a  university  student,  who,  though  en- 
tirely unaccustomed  to  such  fare,  gradually  changed  from  an  ordinary 
mixed  diet  to  one  of  fruit  and  nuts,  which  he  followed  for  a  time  with- 
out apparent  loss  of  health  or  strength. 


302  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

It  is  somewhat  difficult  to  arrive  at  definite  conclusions  regarding 
the  actual  percentage  of  nut  protein  digested  or  assimilated.  The 
experimental  data  obtained  at  the  California  station  show  a  range 
of  75  to  82  per  cent  digestible  protein  when  fruit  and  nuts  were 
eaten  together,  but  the  figure  for  nut  protein  is  doubtless  higher. 
These  coefficients  were  in  all  probability  influenced  by  the  fruit  pro- 
tein, which  has  been  found  to  be  less  digestible  than  the  nut  protein. 
The  digestibility  of  protein  in  28  experiments  with  mixed  diets,  to 
which  were  added  fruit  and  nuts,  averaged  90  per  cent. 

As  fruits,  with  the  exception  of  the  avocado  and  olive,  yield  only 
a  small  amount  of  fat,  the  fat  which  is  contained  in  a  fruitarian  diet 
must  be  very  largely  obtained  from  the  nuts.  The  average  coefficients 
of  digestibility  for  this  nutrient  in  30  experiments  with  men  on  a  diet 
of  fruit  and  nuts  was  86  per  cent,  and  in  the  28  experiments  just  re- 
ferred to  it  was  85  per  cent.  These  figures  are  about  10  per  cent 
lower  than  the  average  coefficient  for  digestibility  of  fats  in  the  ordi- 
nary mixed  diet.  The  digestibility  of  the  carbohydrates  in  nuts,  so 
far  as  the  available  data  show,  is  about  equal  to  that  of  the  same 
ingredients  in  other  foods. 

So  far  as  can  be  ascertained  no  experiments  have  been  made  on  the 
ease  or  rapidity  of  digestion  of  nuts.  In  the  absence  of  such  data  it  is 
fair  to  assume  that  within  reasonable  limits  the  finer  the  state  of 
subdivision  of  the  food  material,  the  easier,  the  more  rapid,  and  per- 
haps the  more  nearly  complete  will  be  the  digestion  or  assimilation, 
presupposing,  of  course,  that  the  nuts  are  not  eaten  in  addition  to  a 
heart  a*  meal.  Too  much  stress  can  not  be  laid  on  the  necessity  of 
thorough  mastication  of  nuts.  This  is  emphasized  by  the  results  ob- 
tained with  one  of  the  subjects  at  the  Calilornia  station,  who  ate 
largelv  of  nuts  but  did  not  properly  masticate  his  food.  The  coeffi- 
cients of  digestibility  of  the  food  were  far  lower  than  for  other  sub- 
jects who  chewed  their  food  thoroughly.  The  experiments  with  fruit 
and  nut  diets  in  general  indicate  that  nut  protein  is  as  easily,  even  if 
not  quite  so  completely,  digested  as  protein  from  bread  and  milk. 

The  present  discussion  refers  only  to  the  nuts  included  in  the 
studies  at  the  California  station,  viz,  the  almond,  Brazil  nut,  coeoanut, 
peanut,  pecan,  pignolia,  and  walnut.  It  is  believed  that  these  are 
typical  of  the  ordinary  edible  nuts,  but  further  digestion  experiments 
are  much  needed  for  the  purpose  of  testing  some  other  nuts. 

As  regards  the  work  of  other  investigators,  both  Memino0  and 
Merrill6  report  experiments  with  cooked  chestnuts.  Memmo's  sub- 
ject was  a  farm  laborer,  53  years  old,  working  eight  hours  a  day. 
The  experiment  lasted  four  days.  During  the  first  two  the  food  con- 
sisted exclusively  of  chestnut  products.     This  was  modified  during 

a  Ann.  Inst.  Ig.  Sper.  Univ.  Roma,  n.  s.,  4  (1894),  p.  263. 
>>  Maine  Sta.  Bui.  131,  p.  146. 


■U1E    AXD    THEIE    BGB  S    FOOD. 

the  last  two  days  by  the  addition  of  herring  and  cheese.     In 

rlinent  75  pear  cent  of  the  protein.  87  per  cent  of  the  fat.  97  per 
cent  of  the  total  carbohydrates,  and  S3  per  cent  of  the  ash  were  assim- 
ilated. The  last  figure  is  high:  the  others  correspond  to  those 
reported  for  the  California  experiments  with  i  nd  nut  diet. 

Tl.  :' Merrill's  experiments  were  two  men  aged  23  and  34 

lively.     A  mixed  diet  was  used.     Each  subject  consumed 
daily  _     :  .-     .    ..-ooked  chestnut  flour,  which  furnished  abou"  _ 

per  cent  of  the  proteids.  50  per  cent  of  the  fat.  nearly  50  per  cent  of  the 
carbohydrate-,  and  not  far  from  40  per  cent  of  the  total  fuel  value  of 
the  food.  The  average  digestion  coefficients  obtained  for  chestnuts 
with  the  two  subjects  were  protein  56  per  cent,  fat  63  per  cent,  and 
total  carbohydrates  OS  per  cent,  while  89  per  cent  of  the  energy 
avadable.  Mem  in  o  also  studied  a  kind  of  acorn  bread  eaten  in  Italy. 
and  found  it  was  fairly  well  assimilated,  though  not  very  palatable. 
Saikia  found   tl.  I    raw  Italian   chestnuts  was    relatively 

indigestible. 

It  would  appear,  then.  that,  while  it  is  not  possible  to  state  the  e: 

b  coefficients  for  all  nuts,  enough  has  been  done  to  indicate 
their  lugh  nutritive  value  and  digestibility. 

PLACE  OF  NUTS  IX  THE  DIET. 

It  has  been  shown  by  numerous  invest  that  nuts  are  rich  in 

protein  and  fat  and  that  these  nutrients  can  be  fairly  well  assimilated. 

- uch  a  concentrated  food,  their  proper  pi 
a  matter  for  more  careful  consideration  than  is  tfa  y  of 

our  ordinary  food  materials.     It  must  not  be  l  Tg-nten  that  a  cea 
bulkiness  of  the  diet  is  conducive  to  its  normal  aa  that 

too  concentrated  nutriment  is  often  the  ea\>  urb- 

ances.     It  might  be  expected,  then,  that  nuts  could  :  advan- 

Mialj  used  in  connection  with  more  bulky  : 

etc.     Most  rationally  used,  they  should 
constitute  an  integral  part  of  the  menu  rather  >plemen 

already  abundant  meal.     Since  nuts  a: 

considerable  quantity  out  of  hand  at  odd  times  will  mean  an  over- 
supply  of  food  if  a  corresponding  reduction  is  not  made  in  other  foods. 
The  distress  sometimes  experienced  when  nut  undoubt- 

edly often  due  to  improper  mastication  or  to  overindulgence.     The 
investigations   made   at    the  California  station  indicate  clearly 
considerable  quantities  of  nuts  properly  eaten  do  not  cause  disti 

pular  belief  that  a  little  salt  with  nuts  prevents  the  diges- 
tive disturbance  resulting  from  eating  them.     To  most  persons,  salt 
undoubtedly  adds  to  the  palatability  of  the  nuts,  but  no  i:. 
tions  have   been    found    on  record   which   demonstrate    any  a. 
improvement  in  the  digestibility  of  nuts  due  to  salt. 

oJour.  Bi        -  251. 


304  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    09?    AGRICULTURE. 

Nuts  may  be  readily  used  as  staple  articles  of  diet,  as  an  ingredient 
in  salads  and  in  soup-  9  -  Tuning  for  poultry,  in  the  making  of 
Berts,  and  in  many  other  ways.  Wild  turkey  stuffed  with  pecan  nuts 
is  a  dish  popular  with  old  Virginia  cooks,  just  as  goose  stuffed  with 
chestnuts  is  prized  in  Germany.  Salted  nuts  and  nuts  crystallized 
in  sugar  are  very  common  accompaniments  of  other  foods.  In  general, 
the  nuts  rich  in  protein  and  fat  should  be  used  in  combination  with 
carbohydrate  foods,  as  bread,  fruit,  green  vegetables,  etc..  while  such 
nuts  as  the  chestnut ,  which  do  not  contain  much  protein  or  fat,  but  are 
rich  in  carbohydrates,  may  be  properly  combined  with  meats,  milk 
and  cream,  eggs,  and  other  foods  containing  protein  and  fat. 

Since  nuts  are  relished  by  most  persons,  are  nutritious,  and  may  be 
readily  used  by  themselves  and  in  various  palatable  combinations  as 
an  integral  part  of  the  diet,  they  have  a  legitimate  place  in  the  menu. 
Those  who,  for  any  reason,  wish  to  live  on  vegetable  foods  and  dairy 
products  or  any  form  of  vegetarian  or  fruitarian  diet  will  almost 
inevitably  look  to  nuts,  particularly  such  as  the  peanut,  for  a  con- 
siderable proportion  of  their  total  nutritive  material.  A  fruit  and 
nut  diet  may  be  arranged  to  furnish  sufficient  protein,  mainly  from 
nuts,  to  satisfy  the  requirements  of  the  body,  but  the  consensus  of 
opinion  of  well-informed  physiologists  seems  to  be  that  such  a  diet  is 
not  generally  advisable  nor  to  be  recommended  for  the  majority  of 
mankind  in  place  of  the  more  usual  mixed  diet.  It  should  also  be 
remembered  that  numerous  experiments  have  shown  that  the  protein 
from  mixed  diet  has  a  higher  coefficient  of  digestibility  than  nut  pro- 
tein, which  indicates  that  the  protein  of  nuts  is  the  less  economically 
utilized  by  the  body.  The  argument  which  is  so  often  advanced  that 
primitive  man  lived  on  nuts  and  fruits  exclusively  and  hence  Ins 
descendants  should  do  so.  is  not  generally  accepted. 

The  comparatively  high  price  of  many  of  the  edible  nuts,  particu- 
larly when  shelled,  and  the  difficulty  of  cracking  some  varieties — 
like  pecans,  black  walnuts,  and  hickory  nuts — and  extracting  the 
kernels  at  home,  greatly  militate  against  the  freer  use  of  nuts  in  the 
household.  The  consumption  of  peanuts  and  English  walnuts  is  per- 
haps increasing  faster  than  that  of  some  other  nuts:  but.  whatever 
sort  is  selected,  they  should,  as  already  noted,  form  a  part  of  the  diet 
and  not  supplement  an  already  sufficient  meal. 

NUT    BUTTERS. 

Within  the  last  few  years  so-called  nut  butters  have  been  used  in 
increasingly  large  amounts,  and  at  least  one  variety,  namely,  peanut 
butter,  is  made  and  sold  in  ton  lots.     It  has  already  been  sta4 
in  order  to  insure  the  best  physiological  results  from  the     ietel      use 
of  nuts  they  should  be  thoroughly  ground  up  by  the  teeth  and  I 
other  things  being  equal,  the  digestion  coefficient  will  vary  directly 


NTJTS    AXD    THEIR    USES    AS    FOOD.  305 

with  the  fineness  of  division.  The  nut  butters,  made  as  they  are 
from  the  finely  ground  nuts  with  or  without  the  addition  of  'some 
water,  oil,  and  salt,  have  a  homogeneous  consistency  nut  unlike  true 
butter.,  and  when  properly  made  the  material  is  so  finely  divided  that 
even  if  it  is  not  thoroughly  chewed  it  will  presumably  otter  much  less 
resistance  to  the  digestive  juices  than  nuts  hastily  eaten.  Nuts,  and 
hence  nut  butters,  are  very  rich  in  fat  winch  readily  becomes  rancid 
and  unpalatable.  This  is  doubtless  one  of  the  reasons  why  nut  but- 
ters are  quite  commonly  marketed  in  jars,  etc.,  containing  small 
amounts  which  may  be  utilized  in  a  short  time.  The  nut  butters 
are  recommended  by  vegetarians  as  a  substitute  for  butter  in  culi- 
nary processes  and  for  use  at  the  table.  With  persons  who  are  not 
vegetarians  they  are  commonly  used  for  making  sandwiches  and  in 
other  ways  for  their  agreeable  flavor  and  for  the  pleasing  variety 
which  they  give  the  diet. 

Nut    butter  may   be   easily   made    at    home.     The   nuts   may  be 
poimded  in  a  mortar,  but  a  mill  for  grinding  them  is  much  more' con- 
venient and  may  be  readily  procured,  as  there  are  a  number  of  sorts 
on  the  market.     The  process  of  making  nut  butters  has  been  fre- 
quently described  in  journals  and  cookery  books.     Either  the  raw 
or  the  roasted  peanut  may  be  used  for  making  peanut  butter,  but 
the  roasted  nut  is  the  more  satisfactory.     The  kernels  should  be  freed 
from  chair  and  reduced  to  a  paste  in  the  grinding  mill.     Freshly 
roasted  nuts  are  necessary,  as  those  which  have  stood  for  a  day  or  so 
after  roasting  lose  in  crispness,  do  not  grind  well,  and  tend  to  clog 
the  mill.     Any  sort  of  nut  may  be  used,  but  experience  has  shown 
that  it  is  more  difficult  to  make  butters  from  the  almond  or  Brazil 
nut   than  from  the  peanut.     Blanching  these  nuts  requires  consid- 
erably more  time  and  labor  than  is  needed  to  free  the  peanut  from 
the  skin  which  covers  the  kernel,  and  they  are  also  more  difficult  to 
grind.     Nut  butters  will  keep  well  if  sealed  in  glass  or  earthernware 
jars.     Tin  cans  also  may  be  used,  but  are  not  quite  as  desirable.     As 
might  be  expected,  nut  butters  do  not  differ  materially  in  composi- 
tion from  the  nuts  from  which  they  are  ground.      (See  table,  p.  299.) 
The  nut  butters  just  mentioned  are  entirely  different  from  cocoanut 
butter  and  from  cocoa  butter,  which  are  expressed  and  purified  fats. 
These  "butters"  are  of  considerable  commercial  importance  and  are 
used  for  culinary  purposes,  though  perhaps  they  are  more  commonly 
used  in  other  ways. 

NUT    TASTES    AXD    NUT    PRESERVES. 

Paste?  which  are  used  by  confectioners  for  candy  making  and  in 
other  ways  are  made  from  nuts  with  the  addition  of  sugar°   Some- 
times water  and  starch  are  added,  but  such  admixtures  are  inferior 
to  the  nut  and  sugar  pastes.     The  most  common  material  of  this 
3   a  1906 20 


306  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

sort  is  the  almond  paste,  which  is  manufactured  in  large  quantities 
in  the  United  States  and  is  also  imported.  It  is  used  for  making 
cakes,  candies,  etc.,  the  highly  ornamented  cakes  called  "marzipan," 
so  popular  with  the  Germans,  being  one  of  the  very  well-known 
almond-paste  confections. 

Chestnuts  preserved  or  candied  in  sirup  and  then  dried,  the  mar- 
ron  glace  of  the  confectioners,  are  esteemed  a  delicacy  and  are  eaten 
alone  or  are  used  in  confectionery,  etc.  Thus  prepared,  they  are  a 
common  commercial  article.  Much  less  common  are  the  Eu^ 
walnut  meats  in  sirup,  which  are  manufactured  in  Europe  and 
exported  to  this  country  in  limited  quantities.  In  the  Tropics  a 
thick,  sweet  preserve  is  made  from  cocoanut  and  sugar  which  is 
much  liked  locally,  though  those  who  are  not  familiar  with  it  con- 
sider it  very  sweet  and  insipid.  As  the  data  in  the  table  on  page 
show,  these  products  are  rich  in  carbohydrates,  owing  to  the  added 
sugar. 

NUT    FLOURS    AND    MEALS. 

Among  nut  products  may  be  mentioned  nut  flours  and  meals. 
Some  of  these  are  used  in  large  quantities  and  are  made  on  a  com- 
mercial scale,  while  others,  perhaps  owing  to  the  trouble  and  expense 
incidental  to  manufacture,  find  only  a  limited  use.  In  general,  meals 
are  made  from  the  ordinary  edible  nuts  by  blanching,  thoroughly 
drying,  and  grinding.  By  using  a  nut  mill  such  meals  may  be  ground 
at  home.  Analyses  of  some  products  of  this  character  will  be  found 
in  the  table  on  page  299.  Almond.meal  lias  been  on  the  market  for  a 
long  time,  being  used  as  food  for  diabetics  and  for  making  cakes, 
etc.,  as  well  as  in  a  number  of  technical  ways. 

Special  mention  should  be  made  of  chestnut  flour,  which  is  on  sale 
in  the  United  States  and  is  used  for  most  of  the  culinary  purposes  for 
which  the  fresh  nut  is  recommended.  In  Italy  it  constitutes  a  con- 
siderable part  of  the  diet,  in  some  regions  being  extensively  used  for 
making  a  sort  of  bread  or  cake.  One  of  the  most  complete  studies  of 
the  dietetic  use  of  chestnuts  has  been  reported  by  Memmo.a  Accord- 
ing to  the  author,  the  chestnut  often  serves  almost  as  the  exclusive 
food  of  the  peasants  of  Tuscany  for  a  considerable  part  of  the  year. 
The  whole  nuts  are  eaten  in  a  variety  of  ways;  for  instance,  boiled  in 
water  without  hulling,  hulled  and  boiled,  or  roasted.  From  the  flour 
various  cakes  and  other  foods  are  made.  Acorn  meal  made  into  a 
sort  of  bread  with  the  addition  of  about  75  per  cent  of  flour  is  a 
common  article  of  diet  in  several  regions,  notably  Umbria  and  Tus- 
cany, but  the  bread  is  black  and  heavy  and  not  very  palatable. 

The  early  travelers  and  explorers  make  mention  of  the  extended 
use  of  nuts  by  the  American  Indians,  and  the  custom  of  using  acorns 

a  Loo.  cit. ;  see  also  p.  302. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XV. 


Fig.  1.— California  Indians  Pounding  Acorn  Meal  for  Food. 


Fig.  2. -California  Indian  Leaching  Acorns  for  Food. 


XUTS    AXB    THEIB    USES   AS    FOOD.  307 

as  a  staple  food  is  still  kept  up.  The  methods  of  preparing  acorns 
followed  by  the  Indians  of  northern  California  have  been  described  by 
P.  E.  Goddarda  in  a  publication  of  the  University  of  California,  and 
by  V.  K.  Chesnut,6  formerly  of  the .  Department  of  Agriculture. 
Briefly  speaking,  the  shelled  nuts  are  split,  dried,  and  ground  with  a 
mortar  and  pestle.  The  sifted  flour  is  placed  in  a  hollow  in  the  sand 
on  a  convenient  river  bank  and  leached  to  free  it  from  the  bitter  prin- 
ciples present .  From  the  leached  meal  a  porridge  or  mush  is  made,  which 
to  the  ordinary  palate  is  much  improved  by  the  addition  of  salt.  Plate 
XV  shows  the  way  in  which  the  nuts  are  pounded  into  flour,  and 
also  shows  an  Indian  woman  leaching  the  meal.  These  typical  Indian 
foods,  when  well  prepared,  are  relished  by  many  persons  who  have 
tried  them,  and  it  seems  not  improbable  that  improved  methods  of 
removing  the  tannin  and  bitter  principles  present  in  most  varieties  of 
acorns  might  result  in  the  utilization  of  the  acorn  crop,  which  is 
fairly  large  and  is  generally  wasted. 

According  to  Chesnut'sc  investigations,  the  California  buckeye  or 
horse-chestnut  is  also  used  by  the  Indians  as  a  food  and  is  leached  to 
free  it  from  poisonous  or  objectionable  matters  in  much  the  same  way 
as  the  acorn.  Many  attempts  have  been  made  in  Europe  and  else- 
where to  treat  the  fruit  of  the  common  horse-chestnut  in  some  way  so 
that  it  might  be  made  wholesome  and  palatable,  for  it  undoubtedly 
contains  an  abundance  of  nutritive  material,  particularly  starch;  but 
none  of  these  attempts  has  been  really  successful. 

The  use  of  partly  extracted  peanuts  and  other  nut  meals  with 
wheat  and  rye  flour  for  bread  making  should  be  mentioned.  Such 
breads  have  been  used  for  patients  with  diabetes,  but  have  never 
come  into  general  use,  perhaps  because  they  are  not  very  palatable, 
since  the  nuts  become  rancid  so  readily. 

NUT    CAXDIES. 

One  of  the  most  extensive  uses  of  nuts  is  in  the  manufacture  of 
candy  of  various  sorts,  such  as  sugared  almonds,  burnt  almonds,  nut 
chocolates,  caramels,  pinoche,  nut  brittle,  etc.  "While  there  are  some 
differences  in  the  process  of  manufacture  followed  in  these  candies, 
they  all  in  the  main  consist  of  nuts  and  sugar  in  varying  proportions, 
with  flavoring  extracts,  and  in  some  instances  butter  and  flour. 

The  table  on  page  299  shows  the  composition  of  common  sorts  of 
nut  candy.  As  may  be  seen,  the  water  content  is  low  and  these  can- 
dies are  highly  concentrated  foods.  On  account  of  the  added  sugar 
the  carbohydrate  content  is  high.  The  proportion  of  nuts  used  in 
candies  varies.     By  assuming  that  the  nuts  furnish  the  bulk  of  the  fat 

a  Univ.  Gal.  Pubs..  Amer.  Arch,  and  Ethnol.,  1  (1903),  No.  1,  p.  27. 
61".  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  Div.  Bot.,  Contrib.  Nat.  Herbarium,  7  (1902),  p.  333. 
cLoc.  cit.,  p.  366. 


BBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

in  the  candy  imated  that  nuts  constituted  about  50  per  cent  in 

the  specimen-  I  rzed.  It  is  perhaps  well  to  suggest  that  nut  can- 
dies and  other  candies  which  sometimes  cause  digestive  disturbances 
would  be  tisfactory  if  eaten  in  a  rational  way  and  at  the  pr 

time.  Since  they  are  concentrated  foods,  they  should  naturally 
replace  an  equivalent  amount  of  some  other  food  material  and  not  be 
eaten  in  quantity  simply  for  their  palatable  flavor  in  addition  to  an 
otherwise  adequate  daily  ration. 

NUT    COFFEES. 

A  number  of  coffee  substitutes  made  from  nuts  have  been  devised 
and  placed  on  the  market,  peanut  coffee  and  acorn  coffee  being  by  far 
the  most  common.  The  nuts  are  parched  and  sometimes  otherwise 
treated.  Such  coffee  substitutes  lack  the  stimulating  properties  of 
true  coffee,  and  the  infusion  does  not  have  the  high  nutritive  value 
which  is  sometimes  claimed  for  it. 

GEE  EX    NUTS. 

A  number  of  kinds  of  nuts  are  used  before  they  are  fully  ripe,  and 
are  esteemed  a  delicacy.  In  California  in  spring  the  markets  quite 
commonly  offer  green  almonds — that  is,  the  almond  picked  from  the 
tree  while  the  husk  is  of  a  decided  green  color  and  easily  separated 
from  the  soft  and  immature  shell.  The  kernel,  after  the  skin  is  peeled 
off.  is  eaten  with  or  without  salt,  and  is  relished  by  many  persons. 
The  price  of  green  almonds  in  California  markets  commonly  varies 
from  about  20  ~  und.     Green  almonds  are  found  to  a 

limited  extent  in  fancy  fruit  shops  in  eastern  cities  and  elsewhere, 
and  are  perhaps  purchased  as  much  for  their  ornamental  appearance 
as  for  their  palatability.  They  are  much  more  commonly  used  in 
Europe  than  in  the  United  States.  Green  English  walnuts  and  green 
hazelnuts  are  also  eaten  to  :i  considerable  extent  in  Europe  and  are 
it  favorites.  The  nuts  are  gathered  when  the  shells  are  fully 
matured  but  not  thoroughly  ripe.  Sometimes  these  given  nuts  are 
imported  into  the  United  States.  Many  who  have  grown  up  in  the 
.try  will  recall  the  delicate  flavor  of  the  immature  butternut  and 
hickory  nut  and  the  stained  lingers  which  they  caused.  Such  green 
nuts  have  apparently  never  been  marketed. 

Whole  green  walnuts  and  some  other  nuts  are  also  used  in  a  quite 

ature    state    for   pickle    making.     They   are    picked   when    still 

er  enough  to  be  easily  pierced  by  a  large  pin;  then,  after  being 

in  brine  for  a  number  of  days,  they  are    exposed  to  the  sun  until 

they  turn  black.     Afterwards  they  are  placed  in  jars  and  covered 

with  hot  vinegar  and  spices.     Sometimes  they  are  treated  with  dry 


NUTS    AND    THEIR    USES    AS    FOOD.  309 

salt  instead  of  brine  before  pickling.  It  is  claimed  that  nuts  thus 
treated  will  blacken  without  being  exposed  to  sunlight.  Such  pickled 
nuts  are  considered  by  many  as  a  very  palatable  dish  for  use  with 
meats  and  poultry.     Walnut  catsup  is  also  made  from  green  walnuts. 

NUT    OILS    AND    OIL-CAKE    MEALS. 

In  some  parts  of  Europe  almond  oil,  walnut  oil,  and  beechnut  oil 
are  manufactured  and  prized  as  salad  oils,  and  in  South  America 
Brazil-nut  oil  is  used  for  table  purposes.  Cocoanut  oil  is  an  important 
oil  in  the  Tropics.  Peanut  oil  finds  a  large  technical  application  and 
is  also  used  in  large  quantities  as  a  salad  oil  and  for  culinary  purposes. 
Oils  are  also  made  from  the  kernel  or  nut  of  the  peach  and  apricot, 
but  these,  like  most  nut  oils  except  those  mentioned,  are  used  for 
medicinal  or  technical  purposes. 

The  various  nut  oils,  which  are  practically  pure  fats,  have  a  very 
high  fuel  value,  and,  like  olive  oil  and  other  oils,  may  constitute  an 
important  energy-yielding  constituent  of  the  diet.  It  is  commonly 
assumed  that,  like  olive  oil,  these  oils  are  readily  assimilated  when 
properly  combined  with  other  food  materials,  as  in  salads,  as  "  shorten- 
ing" for  various  dishes,  and  in  similar  ways. 

The  oil-cake  meals,  as  the  ground  products  remaining  after  the 
expression  of  the  nut  oils  are  called,  are  much  used  as  food  for  live 
stock  and  all  kinds  of  poultry,  and  this  is  especially  true  of  the  peanut 
and  cocoanut  oil  cakes.  It  has  been  suggested  that  such  oil-cake 
meals  might  be  valuable  dietary  articles  if  properly  manipulated,  as 
they  of  course  contain  a  higher  percentage  of  protein  than  the  original 
nut.  Some  attempts  have  been  made  to  thus  utilize  peanut-cake 
meal,  but  the  results  have  not  been  very  satisfactory. 

PECUNIARY    ECONOMY    OF    NUTS. 

The  composition  and  digestibility  of  nuts  have  been  discussed  in  the 
foregoing  pages,  but  little  has  been  said  regarding  the  cost  of  nutrients 
and  energy  which  they  supply  as  compared  with  other  and  more  com- 
mon food  materials.  The  table  on  page  310  shows  the  comparative 
cost  of  a  pound  of  protein  and  1.000  calories  of  energy  when  furnished 
by  different  nuts  and  nut  products  and  some  other  staple  foods,  and 
also  the  amounts  of  nutrients  and  energy  which  10  cents'  worth  of 
these  foods  would  supply,  rating  the  foods  at  certain  average  prices 
per  pound. 

The  common  nuts — though,  with  the  exception  of  the  peanut,  they 
are  more  expensive  sources  of  protein  and  energy  than  meat  and  a 
number  of  the  common  foods — may  yet  be  considered  reasonably 
cheap  sources  of  nutrients  and  energy,  and  hence  may  be  regarded 
as  justifiable  additions  to  the  diet  on  the  score  of  economy.     For 


310 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPABTM]  ICULTUBE. 


--egetarian  or  fruitarian,  wh<   I  to  nuts  as  the  chief  sou: 

protein  in  the  diet,  the  peanut  must  he  i  nch  the  : 

Lomical.     As  may  be  seen  by  a  referenc  nts 

will  purchase  in  in  and  i  hen  expended  for  the  fl 

and  meals  than  :  :  the  other  foods,  but  it  must  be  remembered 

in  this  connection  that  these  are  tl  materials  requir.    s 

siderable  preparation  before  they  are  palatable.     This  is  n<      \ 
sary  with  fruits  and  nuts,  except  in  the  ■:  tut  and  chi  -~- 

nut,  winch  are  usually  roasted  before  they 
by  most  persons,  though  there  are  those 
considering  nuts,  it  is  readily  observed  that  10  < 

the  same  amount  of  nut  pi  =   of  animal  protein,  except  in  the 

case  of  cheese  and  skim  milk.     If  spent  for  peanuts,  it  will  | 
more  than  twice  the  protein  and  six  times  the  enem  could  be 

bought  for  the  same  expenditure  for  porterl.      -  ;tk. 


Price 

per 

pound. 

one 
pound 
protein. 

-     . 
1,000 

An: 

Kind  of  food. 

Total 

- 

1 

- 
- 

.ucts: 

I 

- 

Pound*. 

Pounds. 

Pound*. 

I 

. 

S 

20 

1.76 

13.0 
8.3 

■ 

0.06 
.04 
.07 

0.14 

- 

.44 

78B 

1  rata 

1,196 

" 

_ 

• 

. 

. 

Hickorv  cuts 

9 

" 

1.11 

-■ 

1 

1 

t* 

7 

- 

3.6 

1.43 

.31 

' 

. 



1 

" 

. 

Pignolias 

Pistachios 

.74 

.40 

! 

.14 
.11 

: 

■ 

Z 

40 

3. 17 

21.0 

E 

.04 

.13 

h33 

AJmo 

475 

Peanut  t  otter 

20 

7.1 

' 

- 

.09 

1.412 

jt  candy 

.' 

_  S 

11.8 

.04 

1 

. 

•    foods  for  com- 
ison: 

1.31 

.07 

! 



4 

1.21 

12.0 

.  " 

■ 

.13 

■ 

i 

. 

i 

. 

.03 

1,330 

:  flour 

3 

- 

3.  S3 

• 

-    ■ 

"  •    ' 

Beans,  dried 

i 

3.1 

! 

LIP 

H 

- 

1.11 

t,4 

■     1 

.09 

~, 

It  is  of  more  than  passing  interest  to  note  that  10  vorth  of 

will  contain  about   4  oun-o  -        -  and 

calories  of  energy,  which  is  more  protein  and  en-    _  n  is 

furnished  by  many  ratio:.-      _       led  as  adequate  for  a  day.     Alth      a 
peanuts  supply  protein  and  energy  for  a  smaller  sum  than  brt 
are  outranked  by  dried  I  oich.  at  5 


NUTS    AND    THEIR    USES    AS    POOD,  311 

for  10  cents  over  200  grams  of  protein  ami  3,200  calories  of 
If  more  peanuts  and  dried  beans  were  used  by  fruitarians,  their  diet 
would  be  enriched  and  the  cost  decreased.     The  almond,  so  much 
in  favor  with  fruitarians,  furnishes  for  10  cents  about  one-fourth 
the  protein  and  less  than  one-third  the  energy  supplied  by  peanuts. 

HANDLING    AND    MARKETING    NUTS. 

Within  the  last  few  years  the  trade  in  shelled  nuts  has  very  mark- 
edly increased,  and  shelled  walnuts,  hickory  nuts,  almonds,  Eng 
walnuts,  pecans,  etc.,  are  now  very  commonly  found  in  shops.  The 
bulk  of  the  nut  crop  is.  however,  marketed  unshelled.  Some  of  the 
unshelled  nuts,  notably  pecans  and  peanuts,  are  very  often  pol- 
ished before  marketing  by  rotating  them  in  rapidly  revolving  drum- 
in  such  a  way  that  the  shells  are  worn  down  until  they  are  more  or 
less  smooth.  This  method  of  treatment  also  removes  any  dirt  anil 
is  supposed  to  make  the  nut  more  salable.  It  is  worthy  of  note, 
however,  that  the  highly  prized,  large  fancy  pecans  are  marketed 
without  such  treatment. 

For  shelling  nuts  on  a  commercial  scale  a  number  of  ingenious 
machines  have  been  devised.  In  order  to  meet  the  market  demand 
for  clean  and  uniformly  colored  nuts,  many  nut  growers  have  resorted 
to  the  process  of  bleacliing  their  product.  The  first  attempts  in  this 
direction  were  made  by  sulphuring:  that  is,  by  exposing  the  nuts 
to  sulphur  vapor.  This  treatment,  though  improving  the  color, 
proved  decidedly  injurious  to  the  flavor  of  the  nuts  and  lessened  the 
keeping  qualities.  At  the  California  experiment  station  experi- 
ments with  bleaching  solutions  have  been  carried  on  and  very  satis- 
factory results  have  been  obtained  with  a  mixture  of  sal  soda,  chlorid 
of  lime,  and  water.  According  to  reports  of  the  imperial  department 
of  agriculture  of  the  West  Indies,0  a  similar  process  has  been  sue*  -  - 
fully  used  for  bleaching  peanuts.  The  consumer  should  bear  in 
mind  that  the  bleaching  of  nuts  is  entirely  unnecessary  and  in  no 
way  increases  their  food  value.  The  process  is  carried  on  solely  for 
the  purpose  of  improving  the  appearance  of  the  nut  and  thus  com- 
manding a  higher  price.  It  will  doubtless  be  continued  as  long  as 
the  public  is  willing  to  be  guided  by  appearance  rather  than  food 
value.  The  term  '•bleaching,'*  as  applied  to  nuts,  must  not  be  con- 
founded with  the  household  term  ••"blanching,"  which  applies  to  the 
process  of  removing  the  skins  from  nut  meats,  as  almonds,  by  immers- 
ing them  for  a  short  time  in  hot  water. 

Vegetables  and  fruits  exposed  for  sale  under  ordinary  condition- 
may  be  readily  contaminated  with  bacteria,  dirt,  and  dust.  Nuts 
sold  in  their  shells  are  protected  in  large  measure  from  such  contami- 
nation, yet  many  careful  housewives  wash,  or  at  least  wipe,  the  nuts 

aIinp.  Dept.  Agr.  West  Indies  Pamphlet  No.  43,  n.  s. 


312  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

which  are  to  be  cracked  and  served  in  the  shells,  as  anything  which 
adheres  to  the  shell  would  readily  contaminate  the  nuts  after  crack- 
ing, if  all  were  mixed  together  in  a  dish.  Shelled  nuts,  if  exposed  to 
dust  in  shops  and  markets,  should  be  washed  before  they  are  used  for 
salads,  etc.  If  exposed  to  damp  conditions,  nuts  mold  and  decay,  and 
even  under  favorable  conditions  the  nut  oils  and  pits  become  rancid 
on  long-continued  storing.  In  the  main,  however,  the  keeping  quali- 
ties of  most  nuts  are  excellent.  Nuts  should  be  stored  in  such  a  way 
that  they  may  be  free  from  attacks  of  insect  enemies.  When  such 
precautions  are  not  taken,  "wormy"  nuts  are  by  no  means  uncommon. 

SUMMARY. 

Summarizing  the  foregoing  data,  it  may  be  said  that  nuts  are  a 
very  concentrated  food,  even  more  so  than  cheese,  but  when  ration- 
ally used  they  are  well  assimilated  and  may  form  a  part  of  a  well- 
balanced  diet.  Nuts  are  a  very  valuable  source  of  protein  and  fat, 
these  two  nutrients  being  the  characteristic  constituents  of  the  more 
common  nuts,  of  which  the  walnut  and  cocoanut  may  be  taken  as 
types.  In  nuts  like  the  chestnut,  carbohydrates  are  a  characteristic 
constituent.  For  most  families  it  is  undoubtedly  wiser  to  use  nuts 
as  part  of  the  regular  diet  than  as  a  condiment  or  supplement  to  an 
otherwise  hearty  meal. 

Vegetarians  and  others  who  use  nuts  in  place  of  meat  should  not 
depend  upon  them  as  the  main  food  supply,  but  should  supplement 
them  with  more  bulky  foods  with  a  low  content  of  protein  and  fat. 
As  a  whole,  nuts  may  be  classed  among  the  staple  foods  and  not 
simply  as  food  accessories.  At  usual  prices,  nuts  are  reasonable 
sources  of  protein  and  energ}'.  Peanuts  supply  protein  and  energy 
very  cheaply,  even  compared  with  such  staple  foods  as  bread  and 
beans.  There  are  a  number  of  nut  foods  on  the  market,  but  it  may 
be  stated  that  there  is  little  to  be  gained  from  the  standpoint  of  food 
value  or  economy  in  their  use,  especially  by  healthy  persons  who 
are  willing  to  masticate  their  food  thoroughly  and  to  use  nuts  in 
reasonable  combinations.  Unless  something  has  been  added,  the 
nutritive  materials  in  such  special  preparations  can  not  be  greater 
than  the  nuts  from  whiteh  they  are  made,  though  in  the  mechanical 
condition  or  in  some  other  way  the  foods  may  be  better  fitted  for 
ready  assimilation.  Furthermore,  nut  butters  and  similar  foods 
give  a  pleasant  variety  to  the  diet,  and  they  are  relished  by  many 
who  would  not  care  for  the  unprepared  nuts. 

Though  less  subject  to  contamination  than  many  other  foods,  nuts 
should  be  handled  and  stored  under  good  conditions,  and  especially 
should  be  protected  from  dampness  and  insect  enemies. 


SOME  RECENT  STUDIES  OF  THE  MEXICAN  COTTON  BOLL 

WEEVIL. 

By  W.  I).  Hunter, 
In  Charge  of  Cotton  Boll  Weevil  Investigations,  Bureau  of  Entomology. 

INTRODUCTORY. 

The  boll  weevil  problem  still  remains  a  most  important  one  for  the 
cotton  industry  of  this  country.  The  insect  continues  to  spread. 
Climatic  barriers  have  given  it  temporary  checks,  but  they  have  been 
successively  overcome.  The  prediction  that  the  pest  will  eventually 
reach  the  limits  of  cotton  culture  in  this  country  has 'repeatedly  been 
made,  but  an  important  consideration  connected  with  the  future 
spread  has  received  less  attention,  largely  because  it  has  more  recently 
become  evident.  This  consideration  is  that  damage  in  new  regions 
is  likely  to  be  more  severe  than  it  has  been  in  the  territory  infested 
up  to  this  time.  The  experience  of  the  past  two  years  has  rather 
tended  to  obscure  some  of  the  features  of  the  weevil  problem.  The 
large  crops  produced  in  Texas  have  given  an  erroneous  impression  of 
the  prospects.  It  is  true  that  very  remarkable  results  have  been  ob- 
tained in  the  work  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture.  Making  due 
allowance  for  this  important  work,  it  must  be  stated  that  the  recent 
large  crops  are  largely  due  rather  to  a  combination  of  conditions  favor- 
able to  the  growth  of  the  plant  and  unfavorable  to  the  weevil  than  to  a 
lessened  capacity  for  damage  on  the  part  of  the  insect.  The  work  of 
the  Bureau  of  Entomology  has  shown  that  in  Texas,  except  in  unusu- 
ally wet  seasons,  a  fair  crop  can  easily  be  produced.  The  possibilities 
of  production  in  a  favorable  season  are  shown  by  the  fact  that  in  1906 
the  infested  area  produced  about  one-third  of  the  total  crop  of.  the 
United  States;  but  the  same  success  will  by  no  means  necessarily 
follow  in  other  regions  where  the  conditions  are  different.  There- 
fore future  developments  must  be  awaited  with  some  solicitude. 

THE    STATUS    OF    THE    COTTOX    BOLL    WEEVIL    IX    1906. 

The  total  area  infested  by  the  cotton  boll  weevil  in  1906  is  indi- 
cated on  the  accompanying  map  (fig.  9).  It  extends  over  the 
greater  part  of  the  cotton-producing  region  of  Texas,  much  of  Lou- 
isiana, and  comparatively  small  areas  in  Oklahoma  and  Arkansas. 

313 


314 


YEABBOOK    OP    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


This  area  extends  a  distance  of  about  590  miles  northward  from 
Brownsville,  where  the  insect  first  invaded  the  State  of  Texas.  The 
insi  ct  I  >read  both  to  the  west  and  to  the  east.     At  present 


the   infested   area   extends   a   distance   of  400   miles   east    and   west. 
Within  the  i  area  the  annual    rainfall   ranges  from   about    12 

inches  in  the  west  to  more  than  50  inches  in  the  east.     The  altitude 


RECENT    STUDIES    OF    MEXICAN    COTTON    BOLE    WEEVIL.         315 

varies  from  sea  level  to  about  2.600  feet.  The  mean  annual  temper- 
ature varies  from  72°  at  Brownsville,  Tex.,  to  62°  at  Paris,  Tex. 

During  the  season  of  1906  the  increase  in  the  infested  area  con- 
sisted of  a  belt  varying  in  width  from  20  miles  in  northwestern  Texas 
to  over  60  miles  in  northern  Louisiana,  and  Oklahoma.  Over 
1,500,000  acres  of  cotton  land  became  invaded.  This  dispersion, 
however,  began  in  August,  so  late  in  the  season  that  no  appreciable 
damage  was  done  in  this  area.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  estimates  of  the 
damage  for  the  year  1906  must  be  made  upon  the  basis  of  the  area 
infested  in   1905. 

One  of  the  most  interesting  features  of  the  situation  in  1906  was 
the  fact  that  a  considerable  advance  was  made  directly  northward 
into  Oklahoma  and  Indian  Territory.  The  insect  reached  points  as 
far  north  as  the  Red  River  as  early  as  1904,  specimens  being  found  in 
Lamar  County  at  that  time.  For  three  successive  years  the  advance 
had  been  checked  by  winter  conditions,  but  the  season  of  1906  wit- 
nessed a  net  gain  northward  of  about  60  miles.  The  causes  for  this 
great  advance  after  repeated  checks  are  somewhat  obscure.  The 
preceding  winter  conditions  in  northern  Texas  were  not  especially 
favorable  for  the  weevil.  The  precipitation  was  about  normal, 
although  the  temperature  was  slightly  higher  than  usual.  Some 
study  has  been  given  this  matter,  but  on  the  whole  it  does  not  seem 
that  the  climatic  conditions  alone  would  account  for  the  northward 
advance.  A  more  reasonable  explanation  seems  to  be  that  the  weevil 
has  gradually  acquired  an  ability  to  withstand  conditions  that  pre- 
viously checked  it.  We  thus  have  apparently  another  illustration 
of  the  adaptive  capacity  of  the  insect. 

LOCAL    VARIATIONS    AXD    TIIEIE    CAUSES. 

In  such  a  large  area,  where  the  climatic  and  geographic  variations 
are  so  important  that  entirely  distinct  agricultural  provinces  have 
been  formed,  it  would  naturally  be  supposed  that  the  boll  weevil 
problem  has  various  local  aspects.  It  is  true  that  there  is  no  uni- 
formity in  the  damage  that  is  done  throughout  the  affected  area.  In 
some  regions  the  weevil  has  caused  great  depreciation  in  land  values, 
while  others  have  not  suffered  appreciably  in  this  respect.  In  gen- 
eral, the  drier  and  freer  from  timber  the  less  is  the  damage  by  the 
weevil.  The  reasons  for  this  are  that  dryness  increases  the  death 
rate  of  immature  stages  in  the  fallen  squares  enormously  in  the  sum- 
mer and  the  absence  of  the  protection  afforded  by  timber  contributes 
equally  to  a  decrease  in  the  number  of  adults  in  the  winter.  When 
the  foregoing  conditions  are  combined  with  low  winter  temperatures, 
as  happens  in  northwestern  Texas,  there  is  a  total  of  conditions  most 
disastrous  for  the  weevil.     The  reverse  of  these  conditions  is  found 


316  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

in  the  timbered  valleys  of  eastern  Texas  and  Louisiana,  where  the 
precipitation  is  much  heavier. 

In  addition  to  the  variations  in  weevil  damage  due  to  the  decided 
constant  differences  in  climate  that  have  been  mentioned,  there  are 
also  local  and  temporary  differences  of  climate  and  other  conditions. 
These  add  to  the  large-area  variations  local  modifications  within  the 
special  regions.  For  instance,  a  local  severe  outbreak  of  the  leaf 
worm  in  eastern  Texas  has  been  known  to  give  that  particular  area 
comparative  immunity  from  damage  for  one  season. 

Much  information  about  the  local  variations  affecting  the  weevil 
problem  was  gained  in  the  spring  of  1906  by  a  series  of  examinations 
to  determine  the  number  of  hibernated  weevils  present  per  acre  and 
later  by  a  series  of  examinations  to  determine  the  extent  of  infesta- 
tion by  the  first  broods.  These  examinations  were  made  practically 
simultaneously  at  over  thirty  localities.  At  each  place  entomologists 
made  examinations  of  fields  in  different  locations  as  regards  the  prox- 
imity of  timber  and  other  conditions  which  have  a  bearing  upon  the 
number  of  weevils  which  successfully  pass  through  the  winter.  By 
a  plan  of  examining  a  certain  number  of  groups  of  plants  in  each 
cotton  field  it  was  possible  to  determine  the  average  number  of  wee- 
vils present  in  that  particular  field.  By  averaging  the  number  of 
weevils  found  in  the  different  fields  examined  in  any  one  locality  the 
number  of  weevils  per  acre  for  that  region  was  determined.  By  far 
the  greatest  number  of  hibernated  weevils  was  found  in  eastern 
Texas,  in  Rusk  and  Shelby  counties.  In  that  quarter  an  average  of 
more  than  500  weevils  per  acre  was  found,  and  in  some  cases  the 
number  per  acre  reached  nearly  700.  This  area  extended  well  into 
Louisiana  and  comprised  at  least  500  square  miles.  A  study  of  the 
conditions  in  this  quarter  gives  the  best  possible  indication  of  the 
conditions  which  will  arise  in  the  central  and  eastern  portions  of  the 
cotton  belt  when  they  are  reached  by  the  weevil.  Two  widely  sepa- 
rated regions  showed  an  average  of  over  300  hibernated  weevils  per 
acre.  One  of  these  was  in  northeastern  Texas,  another  in  the  coast 
region  including  Bee,  Refugio,  San  Patricio,  and  Nueces  counties. 
These  areas  were  separated  by  extensive  ones  wherein  comparatively 
few  hibernating  weevils  were  found. 

Much  of  the  recent  advance  in  our  knowledge  of  the  boll  weevil  is 
the  result  of  comparative  studies  of  these  areas  of  great  damage  and 
of  other  areas  of  comparative  scarcity.  The  study  has  been  con- 
tinued by  an  examination  of  the  statistics  of  production  as  far  as 
available.  The  production  by  counties  up  to  December  13,  1906,  as 
determined  by  the  Census  Bureau,  has  been  used.  The  crop  of  1904 
has  been  used  as  a  basis  of  comparison  for  the  reason  that  it  may 
properly  be  considered  a  normal  crop.  In  Louisiana,  in  the  heavily 
infested  portion,  the  percentage  of  increase  of  the  crop  of  1906  over 


RECENT    STUDIES    OF    MEXICAN    COTTON    BOLL    WEEVIL. 


317 


that  of  1905  was  9.7  per  cent  of  that  of  1904.  In  the  lightly  infested 
area  of  Louisiana,  however,  the  percentage  of  increase,  determined  in 
the  same  way,  was  44.6  per  cent.  In  Texas  the  increase  in  the 
heavily  infested  portion  of  the  eastern  part  of  the  State  was  12.9  per 
cent,  and  in  the  lightly  infested  region  in  the  north-central  portion 
of  the  State  it  was  59.9  per  cent.  These  figures  show  clearly  the 
temporary  advantage  gained  through  the  scarcity  of  weevils  in  cer- 
tain restricted  regions. 

THE    RELATION    BETWEEN    WEEVIL    DAMAGE    AXD    PRECIPITATION. 

For  a  long  time  it  has  been  recognized  that  the  most  important 
single  factor  in  assisting  in  the  production  of  a  cotton  crop  in  a  weevil- 
infested  region  is  dryness  during  the  growing  season.  An  excellent 
illustration  of  this  is  furnished  by  the  conditions  in  Victoria  County, 
Tex.,  during  the  spring  of  1906.  The  crop  of  that  year  in  Victoria 
County  is  much  the  largest  ever  produced,  although  the  acreage  prob- 
ably was  not  as  large  as  has  been  planted  in  other  seasons.  The 
exact  records  regarding  production  are  not  available  at  this  time, 
but  a  very  conservative  estimate  of  the  crop  of  Victoria  County  for 
1906  is  13,000  bales.  From  the  accompanying  table  it  will  be  seen 
that  May  and  June  were  abnormally  dry  months;  in  fact,  the  total 
precipitation  for  April,  May,  and  June  (4.19  inches)  was  less  than 
half  of  the  mean  total  for  those  months  for  the  five  preceding  years 
(9.28  inches). 

Comparison  of  spring  precipitation  with  the  cotton  crop  in  Victoria  County,  Tc.v., 

1901-1906. 


Year. 


Precipitation. 


April. 


1901 
1902 
1903 
190-1 
1905 
1900 


Inches. 
2.43 
2.85 
1.03 
3.33 
7.58 
2.88 


May. 


Inches. 
0.59 
3.23 
2.25 
4.37 
2.45 
.63 


Cotton  crop, 
"n  bales  of 


total      \f„„fv,i„  '   in  baies  oi 
June.       for  three      vonP:,„'>    500  pounds 


months. 


Inches. 

Inches. 

1.14 

4.16 

1.38 

2.03 

8.11 

2.70 

4.05 

7.33 

2.44 

5.32 

13.02 

4.34 

3.77 

13.  80 

4.60 

.GS 

4.19 

1.39 

9,060 
9,236 
5, 355 
6,495 
9,016 
ol3,000 


c  Estimated. 

While  the  total  for  April,  May,  and  June,  1906,  was  only  4.19  inches. 
the  mean  total  for  1901  to  1905  was  9.28  inches. 

There  can  be  no  error  in  estimating  the  effect  of  dryness  in  this 
case,  on  account  of  the  number  of  weevils  present.  In  fact,  far  more 
than  the  usual  number  of  hibernated  weevils  appeared  in  the  fields 
of  Victoria  County  up  to  the  end  of  April.  In  one  instance  a  total 
number  of  about  1,500  per  acre  was  shown  to  have  come  to  a  certain 


318     YEARBOOK  OF  THE  TEPAETZMEX  .TUBS. 

field.     O:  .  clue  allowance  must  be  made  for  tlie  effect  of  the 

id  the  ant  8  .  referred  to  else- 

re.     However,  the  dryness  rather  interfered  with  the  work  of  the 
ant  and  certainly  di.  ilitate  greatly  the  work  of  the  p 

therefore,  must  be  considered  as  the  controlling  factor. 
In  the  facta  brought  out  in  the  preceding  paragraphs  we  have  the 
most  ex  present  available  for  an  estimate  regarding  the 

manner  in  which  the  boll  weevil  will  affect  cotton  production  in  the 
more  humid  regions  that  it  is  now  invading.  Taking  Vicksburg, 
Miss.,  as  a  typical  location  in  the  Mississippi  Valley,  we  find  that  the 
normal  precipitation  for  April  is  5.86  inches,  for  May  4.85  inches,  and 
for  June  4.31  inches.     This  gives  a  mean  total  for  these  months  of 

2  inches  as  again  riches  at  Victoria,  and  a  monthly  average 

for  the  same  three  months  at  Vicksburg  of  5  inches  as  against  3.09 
inches  for  Victoria.     From  these  figure-  leaf  that  the  weevil 

conditions  in  a  region  like  that  of  Vicksburg  will  normally  be  similar 

hose  of  the  years  of  greatest  precipitation  in  Texas. 

FACTOR-    IX    THE    NATURAL    CONTROL    OF    THE    BOLL    WEEVIL. 

Valuable  results  have  been  obtained  in  an  extensive  study  of  the 
as  in  the  natural  control  of  the  boll  weevil.  Many  climatic  and 
other  conditions  are  known  to  exert  influences  in  reducing  weevil 
damage.  Low  summer  temperatures  check  the  insect  by  lengthening 
the  period  of  development,  and  the  amount  of  the  food  supply  is 
a  controlling  element.  Aside  from  such  general  influences  and  cul- 
tural expedients,  the  following  are  the  principal  factors  which  are  now 
affecting  the  boll  weevil  in  the  infested  region: 

1.  Heat  and  dryness  during  spring  and  summer. 

2.  The  ant  Solenopsis  geminata  and  other  predaceous  inse 

3.  Winter  temperatures  and  moisture. 

•u. 

5.  Para-/ 

6.  The  cotton  leaf  worm. 

7.  Determinate  growth  of  the  cotton  plant. 

irds. 

The  above  arrangement  places  these  factors  in  the  probable  order 
of  their  importance  at  the  present  time.  It  must  be  remembered 
that  future  developments  will  undoubtedly  necessitate  a  rearrange- 
ment of  the  above  lif  ill  prob- 
ably increas  ar.  and  the  effect  brought  about  by  the 
leaf  worm  will  give  that  i:  greater  importance  as  the  weevil 
invades  the  Mississippi  Valley  proper.  The  above  arrangement  n 
merely  to  the  present  conditi 

The  importance  of  proliferation  has  been  brought  out  forcibly  by 
the  writ  .-.  Dr.  W.  E.  Hinds,  in  Bulletin  No.  5( .  Bureau  of 


RECENT    STUDIES    OF    MEXICAN    COTTON    BOLL    WEEVIL.         319 

Entomology.  During  the  year  1006  special  attention  has  been  paid 
to  heat  and  dryness,  an;s,  and  parasites,  the  last  two  of  which  are 
factors  of  which  practical  use  could  more  or  less  easily  be  made. 

Altogether  86,982  squares  and  bolls  were  collected  and  examined  to 
learn  the  effects  of  these  three  factors.  This  material  was  collected 
in  many  localities  in  Texas,  Louisiana,  and  Oklahoma.  In  it  were 
found  38,883  weevil  stages.  Of  this  number  21.1  per  cent  had  been 
killed  by  heat  and  dryness,  27.1  per  cent  by  ants,  and  4.3  per  cent  by 
parasites.  The  total  effect  of  the  three  factors  in  Texas  and  Louisiana 
was  to  destroy  52.3  per  cent  of  the  weevil  stages;  that  is  to  say, 
natural  causes  cut  off  more  than  one-half  of  the  possible  number  of 
weevils.  Moreover,  more  than  one-half  of  this  destruction  was  caused 
by  the  ant  alone. 

A  comparison  of  the  efficiency  of  these  natural  factors  in  Texas  and 
Louisiana  is  of  interest  in  showing  the  probable  future  aspects  of  the 
weevil  problem.  The  combined  effect  in  Texas  was  the  destruction 
of  53.8  per  cent  and  in  Louisiana  44.1  per  cent  of  the  weevil  stages. 
The  rather  close  approximation  of  these  percentages  is  due  to  the 
greater  work  of  the  ant  in  Louisiana,  the  two  other  factors  being  rela- 
tively unimportant  in  that  State.  In  the  case  of  ants  the  percentage 
of  destruction  in  Louisiana  was  35.7  and  in  Texas  31.3;  in  the  case  of 
heat  and  dryness  5.9  in  Louisiana  and  27.7  in  Texas:  and  in  the  case 
of  parasites  0.7  per  cent  in  Louisiana  and  3.5  per  cent  in  Texas. 

The  work  of  the  native  ant  Solenopsis  geminate  deserves  special 
attention.  The  insect  is  distributed  throughout  the  cotton  belt,  and 
in  fact  was  found  by  Mr.  E.  A.  Schwarz  to  be  an  important  enemy  of 
the  boll  weevil  in  Central  America.  It  must  not  be  confused  with  the 
Guatemalan  ant,  the  importation  of  which  has  proved  a  failure.  In 
country  the  native  ant  was  quite  carefully  studied  by  Mr.  Schwarz 
and  others  in  the  early  eighties.  It  has  always  shown  an  inclination 
to  attack  insects  that  it  encounters  in  its  travels  up  and  down  the 
cotton  plant  primarily  for  the  purpose  of  obtaining  nectar.  It  was 
natural  to  suppose  that  it  might  acquire  a  habit  of  feeding  upon 
the  boll  weevil.  Nevertheless,  the  rapidity  with  Avhich  the  ant  seems 
to  be  acquiring  this  habit  is  surprising. 

Our  attention  was  first  especially  directed  to  this  matter  during  an 
ariment  which  was  being  made  to  test  the  effect  of  direct  sunlight 
in  destroying  the  immature  stages  of  the  weevil.  One  hundred  and 
fifty  squares  believed  to  contain  larva?  were  divided  into  two  lots  and 
placed  on  the  bare  ground  in  the  cotton  plat  at  the  laboratory  in  Dal- 
las, Tex.  One  lot  was  left  dried  while  the  other  was  moistened  to 
determine  whether  the  mortality  would  be  equally  great  in  both  cases. 
The  squares  were  placed  on  the  ground  at  4.30  p.  m.,  September  5. 
The  following  morning  numerous  ants  were  noticed  running  over  and 
around  them,  although  no  signs  of  a  nest  had  been  seen  the  previous 


320 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


evening.  Subsequent  observations  showed  holes  in  several  of  the 
squares  in  size  and  external  appearance  resembling  weevil  emergence 
holes  so  closely  that  at  first  they  were  mistaken  for  them.  A  more  care- 
ful examination  showed  that  the  weevils  had  not  emerged,  but  that  the 
holes  were  really  entrance  holes  made  by  the  ants  to  enable  them  to  get 
at  the  weevil  wihin.  Practically  all  of  the  squares  had  been  opened. 
In  the  75  squares  kept  dry  the  ants  had  entered  64,  destroying  prob- 
ably 44  larval  stages  and  20  pupal  stages.  In  the  lot  kept  wet  the 
ants  had  entered  73  of  the  75  squares,  destroying  50  stages  probably 
larval,  and  23  probably  pupal.  A  remarkable  fact  was  that  out  of  the 
150  squares  in  the  lot  only  13  were  not  entered  by  the  ants,  and  9  of 
these  13  were  found  on  examination  to  have  no  weevil  stages  within 
them.  It  seems  reasonable  to  conclude  that  the  ants  have  some 
ability  to  determine  from  the  outside  whether  there  is  some  stage  of 
the  weevil  within  the  squares. 

It  was  thought  that  conclusions  from  this  single  experiment  might 
be  unreliable  on  account  of  artificial  surroundings  and  the  nearness  of 
the  squares  to  the  nest,  which,  however,  was  more  than  3  feet  away. 
Subsequent  experiments  in  cotton  fields  and  the  examination  of 
thousands  of  fallen  squares  have  all  led  to  the,  opinion  that  the  work 
attributed  to  the  ants  was  not  overestimated.  The  following  are 
some  records  of  the  work  of  the  ant  shown  by  examination  of  squares 
picked  at  random  from  the  ground  in  cotton  fields  in  various  par 
Texas:  At  Beeville,  Tex.,  August  13,  out  of  S74  weevil  stages  found 
6S4  had  been  destroyed  by  ants.  In  another  field,  also  at  Beeville, 
on  September  3,  the  ants  had  destroyed  11  out  of  117  stages.  At  Dal- 
las, on  October  15,  the  ants  had  destroyed  39  out  of  247  weevil  stag  a. 
The  following  statement  shows  the  results  of  extensive  observations  on 
the  percentage  of  mortality  in  weevil  stages  brought  about  by  the  ant 
under  different  conditions : 

rUagcs  of  mortality  of  xoeevil  stages  brought  about  by  the  ant  Solcnopsis  giminata. 


Weevil  stages. 

..lity. 

In  Louisi-    ta  _ 
ana. 

Percent.       Percent. 
9                  11.8 

27.  7 
11.8                 !    " 
20.7 

In  view  of  the  abundance  of  weevil  food,  there  is  certainly  nothing 
surprising  in  the  present  indication  that  the  ant  is  rapidly  becoming  an 
important  enemy  of  the  weevil.  We  have  many  letters  from  farmers 
scattered  throughout  the  infested  territory  informing  us  of  observa- 
tions similar  to  ours  on  the  work  of  the  ants  in  cotton  fields. 


RECENT    STUDIES    OF    MEXICAN    COTTON    BOLL    WEEVIL.  321 

Some  practical  conclusions  may  be  drawn  from  a  comparison  of 
mortality  among  weevil  stages  in  fallen  squares  and  bolls  with  the 
mortality  found  when  the  fruit  remains  attached  to  the  plant  \ 
■  careful  investigation  of  this  matter  will  be  detailed  in  a  bulletin  to  be 
issued  in  the  near  future  by  the  Bureau  of  Entomology.  The  hanging 
forms  referred  to  are  only  those  which  are  to  be  found  in  a  perfectly 
dead  and  dry  condition  but  still  attached  to  the  plant  by  a  thin  strip  of 
bark.  This  tendency  seems  to  be  more  developed  in  the  duster  varie- 
ties of  cotton  like  the  Dickson  than  in  those  that  are  more  frequently 
planted  m  the  infested  region  at  the  present  time.  However,  indi- 
vidual plants  in  fields  of  any  variety  observed  occasionally  show  the 
same  tendency  toward  holding  their  fruit,  and  certain  climatic  and 
soil  conditions  seem  to  increase  this  tendency,  sometimes  to  a  con- 
spicuous degree  even  in  case  of  cotton  of  unknown  pedigree. 

It  was  early  observed  in  the  present  investigation  thai  the  hanging 
forms  show  a  considerably  higher  percentage  of  parasitism  of  we'evil 
stages  than  the  fallen  ones.     For  instance,  in  a  very  extensive  series  of 
observations  m  Texas  the  percentage  of  parasitism  in  fallen  squares 
was  3.5,  but  in  hanging,  13.9.     In  Louisiana  a  somewhat  less  extensive 
series  of  observations  showed  a  percentage  of  parasitism  in  fallen 
squares  of  0.7  and  in  hanging  squares  of  8.3.     At  first  these  fio-ures 
seemed  to  indicate  that  a  variety  which  would  more  or  less  uniformly 
retain  instead  of  dropping  its  infested  fruit  would  be  highly  desirab'e 
in  weevil-mfested  regions.     Further  data,  however,  show  the  fallacy 
of  such  a  supposition  and  also  incidentally  indicate  the  danger  of  erro- 
neous conclusions   in  such  a  complicated  biological  problem  as  the 
boll  weevil  presents.     While  the  hanging  forms  showed  much  hi-her 
percentages  of  mortality  due  to  parasites,  the  fallen  forms  showed  a 
much  greater  percentage  due  to  the  other  factors  in  natural  control 
namely    heat   and   dryness    and    the   ant   Solcnopsis  geminata.     In 
Texas  the  percentage  of  mortality  due  to  ants,  in  hanging  squares, 
was  18.2,  while  in  fallen  squares  it  was  31.3;  in  Louisiana  the  hangino- 
squares  showed  32.3  mortality  and  the  fallen  squares  35  7  from  the 
same  cause.     In  Texas  heat  and  drying  brought  about  a  mortality  of 
18.6  per  cent  m  hanging  squares  and  27.7  per  cent  in  fallen  squares  ■  in 
Louisiana  the  same  factor  resulted  in  a  mortality  of  5.9  per  cent  and 
20,  per  cent,  respectively.     In  other  words,  the  combined  effect  of  heat 
and  dryness  and  ants  in  the  fallen  squares  was  much  more  important 
than  the  individual  effect  of  parasites  in  the  hanging  squares 

From  the  results  of  the  examinations  made  upon  hanging  forms  it 
appears  that  the  mortality  found  among  nearly  10,000  weevil  stages 
present  averaged  42.6  per  cent,  while  in  the  case  of  fallen  forms 
among  approximately  30,000  weevil  stages,  there  was  a  mortality  of 
56  per  cent,  From  this  extensive  series  of  observations,  covering  a 
very  wide  range  of  variable  conditions,  it  appears  that  the  average 

3    a!906 21  " 


ARTMENT    OF    AGI.ICULTV 

salting  from  the  three  natural  faetors  iin< 
13.4  per  cent  greater  in  fallen  than  in  hai  -.     The  . 

y  in  hang  v&ey  near)  fallen! 

he  mortality  in  fallen  squares  is  nearly  twice  as  great  as  in  hang- 
•ie.  too.  that  a  very  large  majority  of  weevil 
und  were  in  the  fallen  squares. 
These  results  indicate  that  those  varieties  of  cotton  which  shed 
-      1  squares  and  small  bolls  most  readily  and  most  com- 
pletely will  have  an  advantage  by  bringing  the  weevil  stages  con- 
tamed  in  those  forms  under  the  most  effective  action  of  these  impor- 
tant natural  factors. 

ADDITIONAL    DATA    CONCERNING    IMPORTANCE    OF    FALL    DESTRUCTION 

<;F    COTV 

It  has  been  considered  by  many  that  the  destruction  of  cotton 
ter  killing  frosts  was  of  little  value  in  the  control  of  the 
weevil.     All  htave  agreed  that  this  pro  :  pafan* 

fore  that  time.     Recent  data  snow  clearly  that  the  ckstruf- 

tion  of  t .  after  several  severe  frosts  is  of  great  value ;  in  fact,  it 

:parem!  o  efficacious  than  earlier  destruction. 

the  first  kill  -:  in  the  fall  of  1000  occurred  on 

-ember  19.     On  t  hnateof 

.ber  of  weevils  per  acre  on  a  00-acre  experime.  nta- 

-  made.     In  different  portions  of  the  field  35   plants   were 

mined  and  calculations  were  made  on  the  basis  of  8,300  p] 

— probably  not  far  from  the  usual  number  in  Tex-.     From 
the  35  plants  examined  20  live  weevils  were  taken,  indicating  the 
nee  of  6,477  live  weevils  per  acre.     On  November  22  another 
.notation  gave  an  estimated  number  of  6.403  weevils  per  acre. 
additional  examination  was  made  on  December  1   after  many 
heavy  frosts.     A:  this  time  14  hibernating  weevils  were  taken  from 
36  plants,  indicating  that  3.22s  weevils  per  acre  were  present  in  the 
field.     Examina i;ions  of  the  remains  of  bolls  on  plants  on  Novem- 
ber 21  revea-      2  Is  in  3251    lis;  thai    is,  6  per  cent  of  the 
idom  in  the  field  protected 7  On  December 
I  ibernating  adults  were  found  in  the  examination  lis. 
From  the  above  data  it  is  evident  that  a  farmer  :              atrol  the 
number  of  v                                             rable  extent  by  the  fall  destruc- 

The  advantag 
shown  :  ;  mi- 

fore  the  first  killing  -  red.     Ar 

lime  the  leaf  rubbish  on  revealed  adult  weevil-  at  th<- 

per  acre.     After  tin  ding  frost  a  similar  examina- 

The  frost  had  forced  large  numl 
of  weevils  from  the  plant-  to  the  protection  afforded  on  the  ground. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture.   1906. 


Plate  XVI. 


Early  Versus  Late  Planting  in  the  Control  of  the  Boll  Weevil. 

[The  upper  illustration  shows  a  cotton  field  planted  late  and  yielding  nothing.     The  lower 

illustration  shows  a  field  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  turnrow  on  same  plantation,  planted 

and  treated  in  accordance  with  directions  of  the  Bureau  of  Entomology,  and  yielding 

three-quarter-;  of  a  bale  per  acre.     |  Original).] 


RECENT    STUDIES    OP  -X    COTTON    BOLL    WEEVIL.         323 

The  very  great  advantage  the  farmer  may  obtain  by  removing  from 
the  field  and  burning  at  the  earliest  possible  dace  all  debris  w 
favors  the  hibernation  of  the  weevil  is  evident. 

LATE    PLANTING. 

An  important  step  in  the  present  method  of  control  perfected  by  the 
Bureau  of  Entomology  is  early  planting.  At  various  times  for  a  num- 
ber of  years  different  persons  have  s  I  the  possibility  of  con- 
trolling the  boll  "weevil  by  late  planting.  It  has  been  urged  that  early 
planting  merely  serves  to  breed  myriads  of  weevils  to  injure  the  crop 
of  the  farmer  who  has  been  unable  to  plant  early.  It  was  thought 
possible  that  better  results  might  be  secured  by  lengthening  the  hiber- 
nation period  by  fall  destruction  of  the  plants,  followed  the  next 
spring  by  late  planting,  and  that  this  practice  might  actually  result  in 
the  complete  extermination  of  the  weevil  over  as  large  areas  as  it 
could  be  applied  to  uniformly.      (See  PI.  XVI.) 

Previous  work  (referred  to  in  Farmers'  Bulletin  Xo.  21G,  pp.  20 
resulted  in  a  very  small  crop  and  seemed  to  show  the  fall 
of  the  proposed  method.     However,  it  was  decided  to  obtain  more 
exact    information  than  was   possible   at   the  time   of   the   previous 
experiment.     Accordingly,  at  four  j  presenting  different  cli- 

matic conditions,  carefully  planned  experiments  in  late  planting  were 
conducted  in  1906.  For  these  experiments  fields  were  selected  which 
completely  isolated  from  other  cotton  to  prevent  the  inflow  of 
weevils  from  other  fields,  which  might  have  happened  in  the  case  of 
the  previous  experiment.  In  brief,  the  results  of  this  work  have 
amply  verified  previous  conclusions.     In  .not  one  of  the  four  e 

any  cotton  whatever  produced.     The  plants  grew  well,  in  some 

3  reaching  a  uniform  height  of  about  5  feet,  and  the  only  apparent 
factor  in  preventing  the  maturing  of  a  crop  of  cotton  was  the  presence 
of  the  weevil.  The  most  striking  of  the  four  experiments  was  located 
on  the  Edwards  Plateau,  about  30  miles  west  of  Kerrville,  Tex.  At 
this  place  was  found  a  field  of  16  acres  which  had  been  in  cotton  hi 
1905.  Very  earlv  in  Xovember  of  that  vear  the  owner  turned  a  large 
herd  of  goats  into  the  cotton  field  during  a  drought  which  had  reduced 
his  pasturage  area.     In  a  few  days  no  traces  of  green  portions  of  the 

its  were  visible.  The  goats  stripped  the  stalks  of  leaves,  squ; 
and  bolls.  Cold  weather  following  during  Xovember  prevented  the 
growth  of  any  sprouts  from  the  stalks  that  might  have  furnished 
nance  for  the  weevils.  Xo  other  cotton  was  planted  nearer  than 
9  miles  from  this  field  either  in  1905  or  1906.  During  1906  the  field 
was  planted  on  June  10.  The  cotton  grew  to  a  height  of  about  5 
but  weevils   appeared  practically  as  soon  as  the   plants   came 

and  soon  multiplied  sufficiently  to  cut  off  all  the  fruit.  There 
is  no  reason  to  suppose  that  the  weevils  that  did  this  damage  were 
not  those  that  passed  the  winter  in  the  immediate  vicinity.     The 


324  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

appearance  of  the  first  specimens  found  clearly  indicated,  that  they 
were  hibernated  individuals.  Their  numbers  and  the  time  of  their 
appearance,  together  with  a  considerable  amount  of  data  now  avail- 
able as  to  the  distance  hibernated  weevils  can  fly,  show  clearly  that 
they  had  survived  the  long  period  from  November  to  July  without 
food. 

Data  obtained  from  weevils  placed  in  cages  in  the  fall  of  1905  throw 
considerable  light  upon  the  obscure  point  of  the  possible  length  of 
the  hibernation  period.  In  an  excellent  series  of  experiments  insti- 
tuted by  the  Louisiana  Crop  Pest  Commission  at  Keatchie  under  Mr. 
Wiimon  Newell's  direction,  it  was  found  that  the  weevils  placed  in 
wire  compartments  in  the  field  on  November  18  did  not  emerge  until 
the  27th  and  28th  of  the  following  June.  In  this  case  the  arrangement 
of  the  experiment  precludes  any  doubt  whatever  as  to  the  ability  on 
the  part  of  the  weevil  to  live  in  hibernation  for  a  period  of  221  or  222 
days.  Long  before  the  last  weevils  had  emerged  the  temperature  had 
approximated  that  of  the  summer  season  and,  of  course,  was  much 
higher  than  that  which  caused  weevils  to  seek  hibernation  in  the  fall. 

An  interesting  point  in  connection  with  the  study  of  the  possibility 
of  controlling  the  weevil  by  late  planting  was  the  general  occurrence 
of  volunteer  plants  coming  from  seeds  falling  to  the  ground  in  the 
fall.  It  was  found  at  Dallas,  Tex.,  for  instance,  that  volunteer  plants 
appeared  in  the  spring  at  the  rate  of  over  200  per  acre.  The  number 
of  such  plants  growing  in  the  fields  was  greater  in  the  western  regions 
as  the  climate  became  drier,  but  numbers  of  volunteer  plants  were 
found  in  cotton  fields  along  the  roads  near  Memphis,  Tenn.,  and  in 
the  neighborhood  of  Yicksburg,  Miss.,  in  a  region  having  at  least  50 
inches  of  annual  precipitation.  The  occurrence  of  this  volunteer  cotton 
of  course  could  hardly  be  prevented.  It  would  give  a  supply  of  food 
for  weevils  which  would  be  practically  certain  to  carry  them  through 
even  in  case  planting  could  be  deferred  universally  by  the  planters. 

As  the  result  of  the  work  that  has  been  mentioned  we  have  empha- 
sized the  three  following  vital  difficulties  in  the  way  of  controlling 
the  weevil  by  late  planting: 

(1)  Emergence  from  hibernation  may  be  deferred  until  practically 
the  first  of  July. 

(2)  Everywhere  numbers  of  volunteer  plants  occur  which  would 
furnish  food  for  a  certain  number  of  weevils,  regardless  of  how  late 
planting  might  be  deferred. 

(3)  Testimony  from  a  large  number  of  planters,  which  has  been 
solicited  on  this  point,  and  in  fact  the  whole  tendency  of  cotton  plant- 
ing show  that  to  defer  planting  the  crop  until  as  late  as  the  time 
when  the  last  weevils  may  be  expected  to  emerge  from  hibernation 
would  prevent  obtaining  a  crop,  even  if  the  weevils  were  entirely 
eliminated  from  the  problem. 


CLOUD-BURSTS,  SO-CALLED. 

By  Edward  L.  Wells, 
-     Section  Director,  Weather  Bureau. 

RELATION    OF    PRECIPITATION    TO    IRRIGATION. 

It  is  the  proud  boast  of  the  irrigator  that  he  is  independent  of  the 
elements;  that  it  matters  not  to  him  whether  his  fields  are  wet  with 
refreshing  showers  or  whether  the  heavens  are  brass  above  them,  and 
this  is  apparently  true.  But  to  him  who  takes  more  than  a  superficial 
view  of  the  question  it  becomes  evident  that  the  irrigator  is  not  inde- 
pendent of  the  forces  of  nature,  for  the  streams  from  which  he  draws 
the  water  of  which  he  boasts  are  supplied  primarily  by  precipitation, 
which  is  subject  to  the  same  laws  that  govern  the  rain  that  falls  in 
the  field.  Therefore  he  who  would  make  no  mistake  in  constructing 
reservoirs  and  canals  to  store  the  water  and  convey  it  where  it  is 
needed  should  know  these  laws  and  their  application  to  the  region 
from  which  the  water  is  to  be  drawn.  In  making  studies  of  climatic 
conditions  preparatory  to  inaugurating  irrigation  projects  the  mistake 
is  sometimes  made  of  considering  only  the  normal  annual  precipitation 
as  determined  by  the  records  extending  over  a  period  of  years.  This 
might  answer  well  enough  in  some  instances,  but  in  general  the  infor- 
mation should  be  much  more  complete.  As  for  the  annual  values, 
in  addition  to  the  normal  amount,  one  should  know  something  of 
abnormalities  that  are  likely  to  occur,  particularly  the  least  amount 
of  precipitation  that  may  be  expected  to  occur  in  a  year.  Then  there 
are  various  types  of  distribution-  of  rainfall  throughout  the  year.  On 
the  California  coast,  for  instance,  we  find  what  is  known  as  the  Pacific 
type,  in  which  there  is  a  wet  season  extending  from  October  to  March, 
with  the  late  spring  and  summer  months  nearly  rainless.  In  Idaho 
there  is  the  sub-Pacific  type,  with  heavy  precipitation  in  the  winter 
and  a  secondary  maximum  for  May,  rendering  the  irrigation  season 
shorter  and  storage  comparatively  simple,  for  the  May  maximum 
occurs  at  about  the  time  of  the  most  rapid  melting  of  mountain  snow, 
resulting  in  a  large  surplus  of  water  in  the  height  of  the  growing 
season;  and  the  period  of  storage  does  not  necessarily  extend  over 
more  than  three  or  four  months.  In  Arizona  is  found  what  is  known 
as  the  Arizona  type,  in  which  May  and  June  are  the  months  of  least 
rainfall  and  more  than  one-third  of  the  annual  amount  falls  in  July 
and  August.  Here  the  irrigating  season  is  also  shorter  than  in  the 
Pacific  type,  but  storage  is  much  more  difficult. 

Another  feature  of  precipitation  which  should  not  be  overlooked  is 
the  intensity  of  the  rainfall     At  Phoenix,  Ariz.,  for  instance,  during 

325 


326  'K    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    A.GBICUI/TTJ 

1904  the  average  amount  of  precipitation  for  each  rainy  day 
was  0.25  inch,  while  Winnemucca,  Nev.,  with  a  much  greater  annual 
xotal.  had  only  0.11  inch  per  day.  "When  rain  falls  during  the  grow- 
ing season  the  cause  of  irrigation  may  be  best  served  by  the  more 
intense  type  of  precipitation,  up  to  a  certain  limit,  that  limit  itself 
being  extremely  variable  in  different  localities,  depending  on  the 
topography  of  the  country,  character  of  the  soil,  etc.  The  more  rapid 
the  rate  of  rainfall  the  higher  vrill  be  the  percentage  of  immediate 
run-off,  but  when  the  run-off  reaches  a  sufficient  magnitude  it  may 
become  destructive  to  irrigation  works  and  other  property,  and  then 
any  further  increase  in  the  intensity  must  lessen  the  benefits  received. 

APPLICATION    OF    THE    TEEM    "  CLOED-ErPST." 

That  rain  does  sometimes  fall  with  such  intensity  as  to  result  in 

r  damage  to  property  and  even  in  the  loss  of  human  life  is  a  matter 

of  history,  though  it  is  very  probable  that  these  dov>nrpours  are  not  so 

common  as  is  generally  supposed,  and  that  their  magnitude  is  greatly 

aerated.     It  has  become  a  common  practice  to  apply  to  such  a 

rain  storm  the  name  of  cloud-burst,  though  it  is  probable  that  few 

people  at  this  day  associate  these  storms  with  the  phenomena,  real  or 

ginary,  Jo  w]  3  name  was  originally  applied.     Dr.  Hugh 

Robert   Mill,   of  Edinburgh,   in  his  book  entitled   ""The   Realm  of 

Nature,"  has  this  to  say  relative  to  cloud-bur 

The  rapid  condem  f  in  the  axis  of  a  tornado,  or  in  the  compara- 

-  whirlwinds  that  sometimes  occur  in  all  parts  of  the  world,  produces  a 
dark  funnel-shaped  cloud  tapering  downward  to  the  earth.     Such  a  cloud  occupying 

-  a  ascending  eddy  of  air  is  called  a  waterspout.     When  it  strikes  the 
ground  the  heavy  fall  of  rain  on  a  very  small  area  sometimes  proeluei  -  .  -truc- 

r  a  lake  or  river,  the  low  pressure  hirling  air 

of  a  waterspout  often  sucks  up  a  column  of  water  and  whirls  it  on  for  considerable 

}h  or  swarms  of  frogs  are  sometimes  raised  high  in  the 
air,  carried  for  miles  inland,  and  dropped  as  -  of  fish  or  frogs  to  the  wonder  of 

.  happens  that  the  upward  rush  in  a  tornado  is  strong  c-r. 
the  condensed  war  rail  a  great  quanta - 

;ain.  but  like  a  river,  ancl  the  phenoniei-        -  -      ken  of 
pes  cloud-bur-  a. to  hollow  out 

a  few  minutes.     Severe  accidents  of  thi  :i  occasionally  occur 

in  the  Cordilleran  district  oi  North  in  may  be  sin: 

accumulated,  and  the  Istorms  occur  during  the  passage  of  a  tornado. 

This  reads  very  well,  but,  before  accepting  it,  it  is  well  to  remem- 
ber that  cloud-bursts  are  most  often  heard  of  in  mountainous  regions, 
while  tomadi  .  .zely  a  phenomenon  of  the  plains. 

Gen.  A.  TV.  Greely,  while  Chief  Signal  Officer  of  the  United  States 
Arm}-,  in  his  entitled  "American  Weather,"  wrote    of   cloud- 

burst.- as  foH< 

Apart  from  e\  "ingly  heavy  showers  or  ~  I  the  enor- 

mous masses  of  water  which  now  and  then  fall,  and  which  are  popularly  known  in 


CLOUD-  -'J-CALLED.  327 

In  such 
v.o  must  equal  rainfalls  which  are  otherwise  deemed  ex 
or  even  a  month  in  the  region.     These  downpours  of  torrential  rain  are  form 

L  in  the  less  densely  populated  part 

In  his  report  on  the  rainfall  of  the  Pacific  coast  and  Western  Terri- 
tories, issued  in  .  eneral  Greely  speaks  of  cloud-bur- 

It  is  well  known  that  enormous  quantities  of  water  occasionally  fall  in  these  arid 
as,  the  phenomena  being  known  as  cloud-bur-  downpours  of  rain,  while 

injurious  and  even  destructive  at  the  time.  yet.  being  taken  up  by  the  earth. 

Eully  later  -upply.  through  the  medium 

springs.     The  h  fall  in  a  single  cloud-burst  can  not  be  calculated,  but 

e  .  can  be  expressed  by  no  other  w 

He  follows  this  with  an  account  of  a  number  of  instances  of  precipi- 
tation considered  by  hirn  worthy  of  mention  under  this  head. 

CONCENTRATION  OF  EALXFALL  AS  AFFECTED  BY  TOPOGKAPHY  OF 

COUXTRY. 

It  might  seem  from  the  foregoing-  that  we  would  be  justified  in 
putting  these  extremely  heavy  rainfalls  in  a  class  by  themselves  and 
in  applying  to  them  the  term  ••cloud-bursts."  However,  since  the 
publication  of  the  (pinions  already  quoted  there  has  been  a  wonder- 
ful increase  in  the  population  of  the  WL  and  Territories. 

-ration  stations  have  been  multiplied,  and  much  of  the  mystery 
that  formerly  surrounded  the  so-called  "  '  meriean  Desert ' 

been  cleared  away;  and  modern  meteor.  I  bave  come  to  believe 

m  many  i::  the  damaging  flood-  ned  by 

what  are  called  eloud-burste  are  not  so  much  a  result  of  ex::  - 
dinary  and  unexplained  meteorological  phenomena  as  they  are  the 
resuh  of  a  topography  favorable  to  a  high  percentage  of  .  -  and 
a  concentration  of  this  run-oft  into  a  comparatively  narrow  and  swift- 
moving  stream.  This  belief  is  expressed  by  William  Morris  Davis. 
■  ssor  of  physical  geography  at  Harvard  College,  in  his  Elemen- 
tary Meteorology,  as  foil 

Thecloud-bu:  (B  are  only  -:Tns. 

-md  short-lived,  and  seem  to  result  from  the  erturnir.. 

Tkeclou  accompany 

;re  indicative 
the  end  of  i  .aing  with  ordinary  cumulus  clou.". 

little  rain  falls  that  it  ■:-- 
.  through  the  thirsty  lower  air.  and  :hed 

ground;  next  to  more  active  local  thunderstorms  of  the  usual  type:  and  all  - 
culminating  in  the  drone!  :>m  the  c:  A  namr 

country  is  inundated  by  such  storms  for  a  short  distance:  -hen 

rush  down  channels  that  are  nearly  dry  at  other  times,  gathering  sand  and  dusr.  and 
delivering  the  discharge  rm  to  the  main  rk,  muddy  ton 

many  miles  from  the  place  of  the  rainfall. 


32S  YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE, 

It  is  a  notable  fact  that  storms  to  which  the  term  "  cloud-bui  - 
is  applied  do  occur  in  mountainous  districts,  and  that  the  damage 
caused  is  nearly  always  confined  to  narrow  valleys  through  which  the 
run-off  from  considerable  areas  must  find  its  war.     Stop  to  consider 
that  even  1  inch  of  rain  represents  a  fall  of  more  than  72.000  tons 

ater  on  a  single  square  mile,  and  it  will  become  evident  that  it 
does  not  require  such  a  remarkably  heavy  rain  storm  over  a  catch- 
ment basin  of.  say,  10  miles  square,  discharging  through  a  narrow 
canyon,  to  produce  all  the  effects  that  we  e  with  a  cloud- 

burst. A  rain  of  6  inches  over  such  a  basin  would  represent  a  fall 
of  43.509.S32  tons  of  water.  Among  the  more  recent  destructive 
floods  arising  from  this  cause  may  be  mentioned  that  which  destroyed 
the  town  of  Heppner.  Oreg..  in  June.  1903.  causing  the  death  of  nearly 

people.  An  investigation  of  the  area  covered  by  the  storm  and 
the  amount  of  water  discharged  through  the  valley  was  made  almost 
immediately  by  Mr.  John  T.  Whistler,  a  representative  of  the  United 
States  Geological  Survey,  who  reported  that  a  fall  c^  an  inch  and  a 
half  of  rain  over  an  area  of  20  square  miles,  the  probable  area  of  the 
storm,  would  account  for  all  the  water  of  the  flood.  To  show  that 
this  is  not  a  phenomenally  heavy  downpour,  the  following  instances 
may  be  cited:  At  St.  Louis,  on  August  15.  1848,  a  precipitation  of 
5.05  inches  occurred  in  one  hour:  at  Indianapolis,  on  July  12.  1876, 
2.40  inches  fell  in  twenty-five  minutes;  at  Huron.  S.  Dak.,  on  July 
20.  1885,  1.30  inches  fell  in  ten  minutes:  at  Sandusky.  Ohio,  on  July 
11.  1879,  2.25  inches  fell  in  fifteen  minutes:  at  Madison.  Wis.,  on 
August  S.  1906.  4.45  inches  fell  in  one  hour  and  twenty  minutes:  at 
Jacksonville.  Fla..  on  May  12-13.  1903.  8.03  inches  of  rain  fell  in  less 
than  twenty-four  hours.  In  the  records  none  of  these  rain  storms 
was  spoken  of  as  a  cloud-burst,  but  had  any  of  them  occurred  among 
our  western  mountains,  over  such  a  drainage  area  as  that  discharging 
through  the  Cottonwood  at  Boise,  for  instance,  all  the  phenomena 
usually  attendant  upon  a  cloud-burst  would  have  been  in  evidence. 
Commenting  on  Mr.  Whistler's  report  of  the  Heppner  flood  Mr. 
Edward  A.  Beals.  district  forecaster  in  charge  of  the  local  office  of  the 
Weather  Bureau  at  Portland,  says: 

ntist?  have  never  been  able  to  account  for  "  cloud-bursts"  as  anything  more  than 
heavy  thunderstorms:  therefore  Mr.  Whistler's  conclusion  that  the  ruggedness  of  the 
_:aphy  rather  than  the  quantity  of  the  rainfall  causes  their  great  destructiveness 
appears  to  be  well  taken,  and.  if  correct,  loss  of  life  and  property  in  such  < 
due  t  isitation  of  Providence"  so  much  as  to  the  "folly  of  man"  in  building 

cities  and  towns  in  such  exposed  localities. 

It  would  seem,  then,  that  one  of  the  most  important  things  to  be 
sidered  by  engineers  in  planning  irrigation  works  would  be  the 
probable  maximum  intensity  of  the  rainfall,  in  its  relation  to  such 
features  of  the  topography  of  the  country  as  might  favor  the  dis- 
charge of  lar^e  amounts  of  water  through  narrow  valleys. 


NEW  CITRUS  AND   PINEAPPLE   PRODUCTIONS   OF   THE 
DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE." 

By  Herbert  J.  Webber, 
Physiologist  in  Charge  of  Plant-Breeding  Investigations,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

Xeav  Citraxges. 

Of  the  new  group  of  citranges  or  cold-resistant  oranges,  there  have 
previously  been  described  three  new  varieties  which  were  produced  in 
the  course  of  experiments  conducted  by  the  Department  of  Agricul- 
ture, namely,  the  Rusk,  Willits,  and  Morton.  Nursery  trees  of  these 
three  varieties,  budded  on  trifoliate  orange  stock,  have  been  distrib- 
uted to  a  limited  number  of  interested  growers  hi  order  that  the  varie- 
ties may  be  thoroughly  tested  and  become  generally  disseminated. 
It  is  the  object  of  the  Department  to  make  but  a  limited  distribution 
of  any  variety,  striving  only  to  secure  its  thorough  trial  and  general 
adoption  hi  cultivation  if  the  variety  proves  valuable.  As  soon  as 
good  stock  is  obtainable  from  a  number  of  nurserymen  there  is  no  need 
for  its  further  distribution  by  the  Department.  The  first  trees  of  the 
Rusk  and  Willits  were  distributed  in  the  spring  of  1905  and  the  Morton 
was  distributed  a  year  later.  Sufficient  time  has  not  elapsed  to  allow 
any  of  these  trees  to  reach  bearing  age,  and  no  further  data  are  thus 
available  in  regard  to  their  adaptability  to  various  sections,  soils,  etc. 
In  the  Department's  experimental  orchard  the  trees  have  been  con- 
tinued under  trial.  The  Rusk  has  proved  a  very  prolific  variety,  pro- 
ducing numerous  well-formed  fruits.  The  fruits  of  this  variety,  which 
are  rather  small,  have  for  the  last  two  seasons  been  larger  than  those 
produced  in  the  early  fruiting  of  the  same  trees,  showing  a  tendency 
to  produce  somewhat  larger  fruit  as  the  trees  mature  in  age. 

The  WiUits  has  in  some  respects  proved  disappointing.  The  fruits 
of  this  variety,  which  were  described  as  rather  rough  and  furrowed, 
have,  as  the  trees  grew  older,  become  more  irregular.  Fruits  are 
frequently  developed  which  have  several  of  the  segments  protruding 
above  at  the  apex  in  free  ends,  similar  to  the  so-called  "fingered 
citron,"  though  none  of  these  free  ends  are  so  long  as  hi  that  fruit. 
When  a  number  of  the  segments  protrude  in  this  way,  as  occurs 
in  some  instances,  the  shape  of  the  fruit  reminds  one  strikingly  of  a 

aIn  an  article  in  the  1904  Yearbook  entitled  "New  Citrus  Creations  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture,"  the  writer,  in  conjunction  with  Mr.  Walter  T.  Swingle,  described 
two  new  citranges,  the  Rusk  and  WiUits;  one  new  tangelo,  the  Sampson:  and  two  new 
tangerines,  the  Weshart  and  Trimble.  In  the  1905  Yearbook,  in  an  article  entitled 
"New  Fruit  Productions  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture,"  tbe  writer  described  one 
more  citrange,  the  Morton;  two  limes,  the  Palmetto  and  Everglade;  and  five  new  pine- 
apple hybrids,  the  Miami,  Seminole,  Eden,  Matthams.  and  Gale.  The  work  of  the 
Department  in  the  breeding  of  oranges  and  pineapples  was  at  first  conducted  jointly  by 
Mr.  Walter  T.  Swingle  and  the  writer,  but  since  1S97  has  been  carried  out  by  the  writer, 
who  has  received  valuable  aid  from  Prof.  P.  H.  Rolfs,  Dr.  E.  A.  Bessey,  and  P.  J. 

■r,  of  the  Department's  Subtropical  Garden,  in  connection  with  the  experim 
and  from  Mr.  J.  B.  Norton  and  Mrs.  L.  H.  Webber  in  testing  the  fruits  and  making  the 
necessary  notes. 

329 


330  YEABBOOK    OP    THE   DEPARTMENT    OE    AGEICULTUEZ. 

summer  squasli.     Even  u   bl  st  deformed  fruits,  however,  the  pulp 

is  very  juicy  and  can  be  used  as  a  substitute  for  the  lemon  or  lime.  This 
variety  tendency ,  furthe  :>  drop  a 

before  it  ripens,  probably  due  to  the  abnormality  and 
erfect  development.     The  writer  would  advise  that  this  variety  be 
propagated  sparingly.     It   is,  however,   an  interesting  and  euri 
fruit  and  is  well  worthy  of  propagation  as  a  lawn  tree. 

The  Morton  trees  at  the  experiment  station  at  Lake  City,  Fla., 
and  in  the  Government  orchard  at  Glen  St. 

produced  a  good  crop  of  fine-shaped  and  fine-appearing  fruit.  The 
variety  is  without  doubt  one  of  the  :  the  eitran^es.     Bv  Rids- 

way's  standards  the  skin  color  of  the  Morton  is  deep  chrome  to  cad- 
mium yellow  and  the  pulp  is  between  chrome  and  saffron  yellow. 
The-  :  .  .  Is  of  color  by  Ridgway's  standards  were  not  given  in  the 
original  description  of  the  Morton.17 

The  writer  wishes  again  to  emphasize  the  statement  that  the  cit- 
ciust  not  be  confounded  with  oranges.     They  are  not  oranges, 
and  are  no  more  to  be  compared  ..res  than  are  lemons. 

new  fruits  of  the  citrus  group  which  are  much  hardier  than  the 
orange  or  lemon,  and  which  may  be  grown  from  3  :  miles  n 

of  the  present  orange  region.  They  are  principally  of  value  for  culi- 
nary purposes  and  for  making  citrangeade.  As  an  ade  fruit  they  are 
to  be  highly  recommended,  as  the  different  v.  present  different 

and  attractive  flavors. 

Many  inquiries  have  reached  the  Department  regarding  the  methods 
of  propagating  the  cicrange  varieties.  The  writer  would  advise  that 
they  be  >n  2  or  3  year  old  seedlings  of  the  Trifol 

This  is  a  perfectly  hardy  slock,  which  can  be  grown  successfully 
anywhere  in  the  southern  Unit-  The  ordinary  1  of 

eye-budding  which  is  1  in  the  pn  d  of  oranges,  apples. 

.  is  used.     It  has  thus  far  been  in  to  con 

experiments  in  the  manuring  and  cultivation  of  the  citrange^  and 

hi  the  absence  of  exact  knowledge  the  writer  would  recommend  that 

in  the  difieren;   sections  about  ie  manuring  and  cultivation 

..iven  as  is  used  with  oranges,  pears,  or  apples  in  those  sections. 

In  this  paper  there  will  be  described   three  new  ges — the 

lan,  the  Sav  the  Rustic.     All  of  these  varie 

fruits  of  the  TVillits  and  Morton,  all  having  developed  from  seeds  of  a 
single  fruit  of  Trifoliate  orange  which  was  crossed  by  Mr.TT.  T.  Swi 
with  pollen  of  the  common  sweet  orange  in  the  spring  of  1S97,  in  the 
grove  of  Col.  G.  H.  Norton,  at  Eusiis,  Fla.     Forty  js  were 

grown  from  this  single  hybrid  fruit,  which,  since  their  germina 
have  been  under  the  care  of  the  writer.     A  careful  study  has  been 

0  The  colore  referred  to  in  tl:  the  determir. 

of  the  colore  by  a  cai  .       with  the  sta  .  _iven 

in  A  Xoruenclature  l:  -    by  Ruben  Bidgway:  Boston,  - 


NEW    CII'LUS    A1\D    PINEAPPLE    PEODt 


noi 


3  of  the  40  different  seedlings  and,  with  the  publication  of  this 

r,  5  of  them  will  have  been  named  as  new  varieties  of  citranges. 

While  the  final  value  of  none  of  the  ci .ranges  has  yet  been  certainly 

hed,  the  writer  feels  certain  that  they  will  ultimately  prove 

of  inestimable  value  and  be  cultivated  extensively  in  many  parts  of 
the  world. 

The  hardiness  of  the  Colman,  Savage,  and  Rustic  citranges  described 
m  this  paper  has  not  been  thoroughly  determined,  but  the  experi- 
ments have  shown  them  to  be  apparently  as  hardy  as  any  of  the 
other  citrange  varieties.  At  Glen  St.  Mary  and  Lake  City,  Fla.,  and 
at  the  Georgia  and  Alabama  experiment  stations  they  have  several 
times  endured  freezes  without  injury,  when  the  temperature  we:: 
low  as  15°  and  16°  F.  There  would  seem  to  be  no  doubt  that  inmost 
locations  these  trees  may  be  successfully  grown  in  regions  from  300  to 
400  miles  north  of  the  present  orange  belt  of  Florida.  The  writer 
would  recommend  their  thorough  trial  in  South  Carolina,  Georgia, 
Alabama,  Mississippi  Louisiana,  and  the  warmer  parts  of  Tennessee, 
Arkansas,  and  Texas.  They  can  certainly  be  grown  in  regions  of 
low  altitude  in  Xew  Mexico  and  Arizona  and  in  the  warmer  sections 
near  the  coast  of  Washington^  Oregon,  and  northern  California. 
Thev  mav  be  safely  recommended  for  any  section  which  is  only 
slightly  too  cold  for  the  ordinary  orange. 

THE    COLMAN    CITEAXGE. 


LTE  XVII;  ?LATE   XX,   FIGURE  2.] 

The  Colman  citrange  is  a  hybrid  of  the  Trifoliate  orange  with  pollen 
of  the  common  sweet  orange,  and  is  closely  related  to  the  Morton 
and  \Yillits,  having  developed 
from  another  seed  of  the  same 
hybrid  fruit.  This  new  citrange 
has  been  named  the  Colman  in 
if  the  valuable  serv- 
ices to  agriculture  and  to  this 
Department  of  Hon.  Norman  J. 
Colman,  under  whose  admin- 
a,  as  Commissioner  of 
Agriculture,  the  agricultural 
work  of  the  Government  was 
organized  as  a  separate  Depart- 
ment. The  Colman  is  a  remark- 
able hybrid,  having  fruits  as  large  as  the  ordinary  orange  and  of 
line  appearance.  It  is  very  different  in  character  from  any  other  of 
the  citranges  and  is  easily  recognizable. 

Description"  of  frett  and  tree. — Fruit  comps  lierical,  frequently  n 

ided  or  oblique,  largo  but  rather  smaller  than  the  Morton,  2\  to  2|  inches  high 

and  from  2|  to3|  inches  in  diameter;  color  light  '.range  or  lemon  yellow,  lighter  than 


Fig.  10.— a,  Section  of  the  skin  of  the  Savage  citrange, 
showing  the   shape  and   arrangement  of  the  oil 
glands;  b,  section  of  the  skin  of  the  Colman  ci 
showing  the  shape  and  arrangement  of  the  oil 
glands.     (Twice  natural  size.) 


do-  -      lBBOOK    )F  I  7    AGP.ICrXTV 

I 

] 
main  s  - 

-  .  I 
Uy  with  a  . 
• 
- 
thin. 
in  the  ord .  .  _  . 

-mall 
- 
- 

; 
r  than  tl.  - 
mem 

lerived  from  the  Trifoli  sis  small    one- 

fourth 
i 
L  seed  1  5  from         other  citrus 

frun.  _ 

frui!  -  in  many  in  general 

Inn  frequently  unii 

.her. 

Tlie  Colman  eitra:  _       -    an  exceedingly  in        -      2      ybrid  in 

comb  in;."  *  - 

thus  far  secured  which  has  inherited  in  any  marked  degree  the  1 
fruit   character  of  the  Trifoliate  orange.     The  fuzz  on  the  Colman 
fruit,  however,  in  no  way  detracts  from  its  good  appearance  and  is 
thus  not  a  detrimental  character.     The  foliage  is  in  general  slightly 
larger  than  any  of  the  other  Tri:  .nge  hybrids  which  have 

been  secured  and  is  nearly  half  unif  ■  .ike  the  orange.     In  foli- 

haracters,  therefore,  the  Colman  is  mor.  jiiod  or. 

than  any  of  the  other  citranges.     In  odor  and  flavor  it  is  nearly  inter- 
mediate between  the  two  paj    nts.     In  shape  and  arrangement  ( 
glands  it  is  different  from  either  parent  or  from  any  other  citrange 
which  the  writer  has  examined.     TVhiie  the  majority  of  the  Colman 
fruits   show  very  little  indication   of  furrow  5,  s  as    for 

instance,  one  shown  in  Plate  XX.  figure  2.  have  pronounced  fin: 
radiating  from  the  base  and  reaching  nearly  to  the  apex  of  the  fruit. 
The  tree  of  the  Colman  is  very  thorny,  but  the  writer  has  obs  rved 
many  branches  having  the  tl        -  sf  entirely  suppress  .1  it 

is  highly  probable  that  the  thorns  may  be  bred 

varieties  of  the  common  orange,  by  selecting         Is  for  propagation 
from  such  thornless  branches.     The  almost 

variety  is  somewhat  remarkable  and  greatly  adds  to  the  value  of  the 
fruit.     A  record  of  102  fruits  examined  in  the  last  two  .->ws 

an  average  of  only  1  seed  to  6  fruits. 

The  Colman  is  primarily  re  use  in  making  citra:.     - 

ade.     It  makes  a  rich  01      re-colored  ade  of  high  qua 
of  bitterness,  which    - 
like  the  bitter  principle  of   the   grapefruit,  is  o  jss  stinro 


Yearbook  U.   S.    Dept.  of  Agriculture,    1906. 


Plate  XVII. 


£j.ScJLd£: 


COLMAN   ClTRANGE.      NATURAL  SlZE 


Yearbook   U.   S     Dept.  of  Agriculture.    1906. 


Plate  XVIII. 


£j.£'JL<J£: 


Savage  Citrange.    Natural  Size 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XIX. 


Rustic  Citrange.    Natural  Size. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1! 


Plate  XX. 


_  S> 

fA  "m 

'        "^ 

^^B* 

1 

T*i 

3SBX 

■$ 

W    IP 

* 

^                    ^ 

BF 

1 

Fig.  1.— Branch  of  the  Savage  Citrange.    One-half  Natural  Size. 


Fig.  2.— Branch  of  the  Colman  Citrange.    One-half  Natural  Size. 


NEW    CITRUS    AXD    PINEAPPLE    PKODT  333 

and  healthful.     The  juiciness  of  this  variety,  its  seedlessness,  and  its 

.  specially  lit  it  for  use  as  an  ade  fruit.  It  also  makes  a  very 
fair  marmalade,  and  other  uses  for  the  fruit  will  doubtless  he  found. 
The  tree  is  of  fine  appearance  and  well  worthy  of  cultivation  as  a 
lawn  tree,  aside  from  the  value  of  its  fruit. 

THE    SAVAGE    CTTEAXGE. 
[PLATE  XVIII:    PLATE   XX.   FIGURE  1.] 

One  of  the  best  eitranges  in  size,  shape,  and  appearance  which  have 
been  secured  in  the  course  of  the  Department's  experiments  is  hybrid 
Xo.  779.  a  cross  of  Trifoliate  orange  with  pollen  of  sweet  orange,  and 
ster  seedling  of  the  Willits,  Morton.  Colman,  and  Rustic.  This 
hybrid  has  been  named  the  Savage,  after  Mr.  Frank  Savage,  of  El] 
Fla..  in  whose  orange  grove  many  of  the  Department's  hybridization 
experiments  were  started.  The  Savage  produces  a  large,  usually 
well-shaped  fruit  and  is  apparently  a  valuable  variety,  differing  con- 
siderably from  any  of  the  other  citrange  varieties.  Following  is  a 
technical  description  of  the  varietv: 

Description-  of  fecit  and  tree. — Fruit  spherical  or  slightly  compressed  spherical, 
frequently  slightly  oblique:  of  medium  size,  from  2  h>  2j  inches  in  height  and  from  2\ 
to  3^  inches  in  diameter:  weight  from  3  to  8  ounces,  average  about  6  ounces,  consider- 
ably lighter  than  water,  being  less  dense  than  the  Colman;  color  light  orange  yellow 
(by  Ridgway's  standards  between  saffron  yellow  and  Indian  yellow  .  thus  being  almost 
the  same  color  as  Colman  and  lighter  than  the  Willits  and  Morton;  surface  in  some 
fruits  smooth,  in  others  considerably  roughened  by  depressions:  many  fruits  have  very 
pronounced  furrows,  running  from  the  base  to  the  apex,  while  others  show  only  slight 
furrows  or  none:  with  a  few  hairs  on  rind,  but  these  very  small  and  invisible  without 
lens;  calyx  persistent  but  inconspicuous  as  in  ordinary  orange:  rind  of  medium  thick- 
ness one-eighth  to  three-sixteenths  of  an  inch,  adhering  rather  closely  to  fruit, 
gests  orange  in  taste,  but  with  considerable  bitterness  from  the  Trifoliate  parent:  oil 
glands  spherical  or  ovate,  similar  in  shape  and  appearance  to  those  of  ordinary  oranee 
and  being  different  in  shape  and  more  numerous  than  those  of  Colman  I  iig.  15,  a  :  pulp 
tender,  translucent,  light  yellow  (by  Ridgway"s  standards  between  wax  yellow  and 
Naples  yelli  rw  :  pulp  vesicles  fusiform,  varying  in  size,  smaller  than  in  ordinary  orange 
but  much  larger  than  in  Trifoliate;  segments  S  to  10:  separating  membranes  moderately 
tender,  slightly  bitter,  texture  tender  and  juicy:  axis  small,  one-fourth  to  live  six- 
teenths of  an  inch  in  diameter;  flavor  a  sprightly  acid,  somewhat  bitter,  not  so  sour 
and  bitter  as  Colman.  more  similar  to  the  Morton;  seeds  few.  usually  averaging  3  or  4 
per  fruit:  aroma  pleasant  but  light,  has  a  suggestion  of  apple  odor:  tree  similar  to  Tri- 
foliate,  very  vigorous  and  proline:  hardy,  evergreen  or  semi-evergreen:  without  pruning 
grows  rather tefl  andslender:  foliagedense:  leaves  mainly trifoliolate,  some  unifoliolate, 
large;  season  of  maturity  medium  early,  from  September  15  to  last  of  November. 

The  Savage  citrange  is  apparently  the  most  fruitful  of  all  of  the 
citrange  clous,  or  varieties,  aside  from  the  Rusk.  The  trees  in  the 
Government  test  grove  were  last  year  (1906)  laden  with  a  very  full 
crop  of  nice  appearing  fruit,  hanging  on  the  tree  in  bunches.  The 
fruit  runs  uneven  in  size  and  shows  some  tendency  toward  freakish- 
ness.  a  few  cases  of  protruded  segments  having  been  observed.  From 
the  fewness  of  these  among  the  comparatively  large  number  of  fri 
developed,  it  is  believed  that  it  is  not  a  seriously  detrimental  char- 
acter. The  fruit  is  not  quite  so  sour  and  bitter  as  the  Colman,  bei 
more  nearly  like  the  Morton.  By  those  who  like  a  sour  fruit  it  can 
be  eaten  out  of  hand  with  sugar.     It  makes  a  good  ade  and  a  fair 


334  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETZMEX T    OF    AGETCULTlT;E. 

marmalade,  and  can  doubtless  be  used  in  many  places  where  • 
and  lemons  are  now  used. 

The  tree  lias  dense  dark-green  foliage  and  will  make  a  fine  appear- 
ing; lawn  tree.  It  may  make  a  good  hedge  plant  when  pruned,  but 
pruning  on  top  would  probably  be  necessary,  as  the  test  trees  do  not 
seem  to  develop  many  basal  branches.     The  Sava  j  of  the  most 

vigorous  growers  of  any  of  the  Trifoliata  X  orange  hybrids,  and,  i 
produces  a  considerable  number  of  seeds,  it  is  worthy  of  careful  trial 
hardy  stock  on  which  to  bud  the  varieties  of  the  ordinary  sweet 
orange.  The  Trifoliate  orange  is  used  extensively  at  the  present  time, 
but  many  orange  growers  object  to  it.  owing  to  iis  tendency  to  dwarf 
the  trees.  The  Savage, being  much  more  closely  related  to  the  sweet 
orange,  an  exceptionally  vigorous  grower,  and  wholly  resistant  to 
any  degree  of  cold  which  would  affect  the  sweet  orange,  would  - 
to  posses;  all  of  the  desirable  qualities  of  the  Trifoliata  e  -  and 

would  probably  not  have  the  same  dwarfing  tendencies.  It  might 
be  supposed  that,  being  a  hybrid,  the  seedlings  would  be  too  variable 
to  permit  of  using  them  in  this  way.     While  the  vi  y  of  the 

seedlings  of  the  various  citrange  clons  has  not  been  fully  determined. 
a  number  of  seedlings  have  been  grown,  and  the  foliage  characters  of 
b  are  in  all  cases  remarkably  like  those  of  the  parent  variety,  show- 
ing no  reversions  to  the  pure  Trifoliata  or  jnire  orange,  as  i 
expected.  TThile  the  value  of  the  Savage  as  a  stock  is  entirely  prob- 
lematical, it  is  sufficiently  promising  for  the  writer  to  recommend  its 
thorough  trial. 

THE    RUSTIC    CITFAXGE. 
[PLATE  XIX.] 

All  of  the  citranges  which  have  been  named  have  tree  chara< 
which  render  them  desirable  for  cultivation  in  the  South  as  orna- 
mental lawn  trees  or  hedge  plants,  entirely  aside  from  their  value  for 
the  fruit  the}'  produce.  Hybrid  Xo.  783,  which,  as  stated  previously, 
is  a  seedling  from  the  same  hybrid  fruit  as  the  Column  and  Savage 
and  is  thus  a  hybrid  of  Trifoliata  with  pollen  of  sweet  orange,  does 
not  produce  as  good  a  fr  .ose  varieties,  but  produces  a  rather 

■  bushy,  low-growing  tree,  which  is  believed  to  render   it  es 
ciaiiy  desirable  for  cultivation  as  a  lawn  tree  or  hedge  plant.     This 
hybrid  has  been  given  the  name  Bustle,  which  suggests  the  use  for 
which  the  variety  is  recommended. 

scbiptH)N  of  Fr.rrr  and  tkee. — Fruit  nearly  spherical,  of  medium  size.  & 
and  from  2  to  2|  inches  in  height;  v.     _  lium,  aven 

r  fruit:  density  lighter  than  water:  color  light  yellow  (by  Ridg- 
iards  chrome  yellow  i ;  surface  covered  with  small  incoi  -  which 

altering  arid  hardly  visible  without  lens,  fairly  smooth. 

of  the  oil  i  many  sweet  oranges,  frequently  with  - 

furr  ws  radiatinsr  from  the  stem  and  extei        .  :of  fruit  but  seldom  t 

ing  beyond  middle  of  fruit:  calyx  persistent  but  inconspicuous,  as  in  i 
aedium  thin,  one-ei.  en  thirty-  f  an  inch  in  thicl 

!  irr.it.  as  in  ordinary  orange,  bitter  t  .1  glands  prominent, 


NEW    CITRUS    AND    PINEAPPLE    PRODUCTIONS.  335 

mainly  round  or  pear-shaped,  with  major  axis  at  right  angles  to  surface;  pulp  light, 
translucent,  greenish  yellow,  similar  to  the  pulp  color  of  ordinary  lemons  (by  Ri<  Lgway's 
standards  nearest  to  primrose  yellow,  but  this  color  is  not  exactly  correct);  pulp 
Les  small  and  slender,  not  so  juicy  and  melting  as  the  Rusk,  Colman,  or  Savage; 
segments  6  to  12,  separating  membranes  rather  thicker  and  firmer  than  in  ordinary 
orange,  slightly  bitter;  texture  of  fruit  moderately  tender;  axis  small,  one-fourth 
inch  in  diameter;  flavor  a  characteristic  citrange  acid  with  some  bitterness,  rather 
similar  to  the  Willits;  number  of  seeds  variable;  some  fruits  have  as  high  as  24  se<  ds, 
while  others  are  seedless;  aroma  light  but  pleasant;  tree  similar  to  ordinary  sw<  et 
orange,  spreading  and  branched  below,  differing  in  this  regard  from  other  citra : 
vigorous  and  cold-resistant,  evergreen  or  semi-evergreen,  of  medium  height  and 
shapely;  leaves  trifoliolate,  dark  green,  larger  than  those  of  Trifoliate  orange;  season 
of  maturity  medium  early,  from  middle  of  September  to  last  of  November. 

The  tree  of  the  Rustic  budded  on  Trifoliate  orange  stock  differs 
considerably  in  shape  from  that  of  any  of  the  other  citranges,  devel- 
oping fairly  long  lower  branches,  which  are  more  widely  spreading 
than  in  the  Trifoliate  orange  or  the  other  citranges,  and  giving  the 
tree  greater  breadth  near  the  ground.  The  tree  of  the  Rustic  is  thus 
in  shape  much  nearer  to  that  of  the  ordinary  sweet  orange.  In  the 
other  citranges  there  are  fewer  large  branches  developed  near  the 
ground,  and  such  as  there  are  have  a  tendency  to  grow  erect  and 
stiff,  giving  the  tree  a  shape  more  nearly  like  the  Trifoliate  orange. 
The  foliage  of  the  Rustic  is  dense,  dark  green,  and  mainly  evergreen, 
and  the  twigs,  as  in  the  case  of  all  of  the  citranges,  are  armed  with 
long,  stiff  spines.  It  thus  possesses  all  of  the  characters  which  fit  it 
for  use  as  a  hedge  plant.  The  Rustic  fruits  in  the  seasons  of  1904 
and  1905  developed  numerous  seeds,  ranging  usually  from  12  to  24 
seeds  per  fruit.  In  1906,  however,  for  some  unknown  reason  almost 
all  of  the  fruits  were  nearly  seedless.  If  the  variety  is  to  prove  satis- 
factory for  hedge  purposes  seedy  fruits  are  desired,  and  it  is  desirable 
to  learn  what  factors  are  conducive  to  seed  production.  The  writer's 
experience  at  the  present  time  is  not  sufficient  to  enable  him  to  give 
intelligent  suggestions,  but  he  believes  that  ordinarily  a  sufficient 
number  of  seeds  will  be  produced  to  use  for  propagation  purposes. 
While  the  seedlings  will  doubtless  vary  somewhat,  the  experience 
with  the  citranges  up  to  the  present  time  indicates  that  they  almost 
invariably  produce  seedlings  with  foliage  characters  like  those  of  the 
parental  variety.  Cuttings  from  the  citranges  can  be  rooted  fairly 
easily  in  hothouses  with  bottom  heat,  and  it  may  prove  practical 
to  propagate  trees  in  this  way.  Satisfactory  stock  for  planting- 
hedges  could  be  secured  by  budding  on  Trifoliate  orange  stocks, 
but  this  would  make  the  plants  rather  too  expensive  for  hedge 
purposes. 

As  in  the  case  of  the  Savage,  it  is  believed  that  the  Rustic  might 
also  prove  a  desirable  hardy  stock  on  which  to  bud  the  various  clons 
of  the  ordinary  sweet  orange,  lemon,  etc.  If  it  develops  sufficient 
seeds  from  which  stocks  may  be  grown  the  writer  would  suggest  its 
careful  trial  for  this  purpose. 

While  the  fruit  of  the  Rustic  is  not  so  large  or  juicy  as  some  of  the 
other  citranges,  it  is  nevertheless  of  fairly  good  quality,  and,  as  in  the 


336  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

case  of  the  other  citranges,  makes  a  good  citrangeade  and  may  be  used 
in  making  marmalades,  pies,  cakes,  etc. 

New  Loose-skinned  Oeaxge — The  Thorxtox. 

In  the  citrus-breeding  experiments  of  the  Department  the  improve- 
ments which  it  would  be  desirable  to  obtain  were  carefully  studied 
and  the  combinations  of  parents  were  planned  which  would  be  most 
likely  to  produce  these  improvements.  The  loose,  easily  removal >le 
skin  or  "kid-glove"  character  of  the  tangerine  and  mandarin  oranges 
was  recognized  as  a  very  valuable  character,  as  probably  the  majority 
of  oranges  are  eaten  by  peeling  and  separating  the  segments.  The 
various  clons  of  the  tangerine  and  mandarin  group  of  oranges,  how- 
ever, are  sweet,  rather  insipid,  and  dry,  and  as  a  class  lack  the  rich 
juiciness  and  sprightly  high  quality  of  the  ordinary  orange.  It  was 
thought  that  by  hybridizing  the  tangerine  with  the  common  orange 
hybrid  varieties  might  be  secured  combining  the  most  desirable 
qualities  of  the  two  classes  of  fruits.  With  this  in  view  many 
hybrids  were  made  of  the  tangerine  with  the  common  orange  and 
the  reciprocal  combination.  None  of  these  hybrids  which  have  thus 
far  fruited  has  given  the  desired  combination  of  characters.  It  is 
surprising,  however,  that  almost  the  exact  fruit  sought  has  resulted 
from  a  hybrid  of  the  pomelo  with  pollen  of  tangerine,  the  same  com- 
bination that  gave  the  tangelo,  though  not  from  the  same  hybridized 
fruit.  This  hybrid,  Thornton  Xo.  5,  has  the  loose  skin  and  easily 
separable  segments  of  the  tangerine  and  also  shows  the  tangerine 
in  the  form  and  color  of  the  pulp  vesicles  and  the  green  color  of  the 
cotyledons.  The  character  of  the  pomelo  or  grapefruit,  which  is 
supposed  to  be  the  female  parent,  is,  however,  hardly  discernible 
in  any  character.  The  writer,  from  the  characters  of  the  fruit, 
would  suppose  it  to  be  an  orange  X  tangerine  hybrid  rather  than 
pomelo X tangerine.  The  original  label  of  this  hybrid  was  lost,  but 
only  pomelo  X  tangerine  hybrids  were  sent  to  Mr.  Thornton,  who 
grew  this  hybrid  to  fruiting,  and  there  would  thus  seem  to  be  no 
doubt  as  to  the  parentage.  An  error  may  have  been  made,  however, 
and  if  so  it  will  probably  be  discovered  later  in  the  course  of  the  fur- 
ther experiments.  Regardless  of  the  parentage,  this  hybrid  is  be- 
lieved to  possess  valuable  characters  and  to  be  worthy  of  general 
cultivation.  It  has  therefore  been  named  the  Thornton,  in  recogni- 
tion of  the  aid  which  Mr.  C.  E.  Thornton,  of  Orlando,  Fla.,  has  given 
the  Department  in  connection  with  these  experiments.  A  technical 
description  of  the  variety  follows: 

Description  of  fruit  and  tree. — Fruit  oblate,  flattened  at  the  apex  and  tapering 
from  about  the  middle  to  the  I  .  medium  large,  3|  to  3|  inches  in  diameter  by 

high;  color  orange,  about  the  same  shade  as  the  ordinary  Florida  sweet 
oranges;  surface  Bomewhal  rough,  similar  to  the  King  orange,  but  not  so  markedly 
rough  as  in  that  variety;  skin  medium  thick,  one-eighth  to  one-fourth  of  an  inch 
(rarely  as  thick  as  shown  in  PI.  XXI),  flexible  and  tough,  being  easily  removable,  like 


NEW    CITRUS    AND    PINEAPPLE    PRODUCTIONS.  337 

the  skin  of  the  tangerine;  oil  glands  large  and  conspicuous;  segments  10  to  12,  s<  pa- 
rating  easily  like  tangerine  and  with  considerable  adhering  white  soft  membrane,  as 
in  that  fruit;  separating  membranes  comparatively  thin  and  tender;  axis  small, 
except  in  old  fruits,  one-half  inch  in  diameter,  mainly  hollow,  as  in  tangerine;  quality 
excellent;  texture  tender,  very  juicy;  flavor  a  mild,  rich  subacid,  very  attractive 
but  characteristic,  not  like  any  other  citrus  fruit;  no  indication  of  bitterness  from 
pomelo;  pulp  orange-colored;  seeds  5  to  12  per  fruit,  resembling  orange  in  shape  but 
with  greenish  cotyledons,  similar  to  the  tangerine;  aroma  not  unlike  ordinary  orange 
with  suggestion  of  bitter-sweet  orange,  attractive;  tree  evergreen,  having  general 
characters  of  ordinary  sweet  orange;  leaves  unifoliolate;  time  of  ripening  midseason. 

It  might  be  assumed  from  the  supposed  parentage  of  this  hybrid 
that  it  should  be  classed  as  a  tangelo.  The  fruit,  however,  is  sweet 
and  not  bitter,  and  more  resembles  an  orange  than  a  pomelo.  From 
the  general  characters  of  this  fruit  it  would  be  classed  as  a  loose- 
skinned  common  orange,  while  the  tangelo  may  be  described  in  gen- 
eral as  a  loose-skinned  pomelo.  Some  of  the  fruits  of  the  Thornton 
have  been  affected  with  the  orange  scab  to  some  extent,  showing  the 
susceptibility  of  the  variety  to  this  disease,  as  would  be  supposed 
from  its  similarity  to  the  tangerine.  As  the  fruits  grow  old  they 
become  rather  large  and  puffy,  as  in  the  case  of  the  tangerine,  and  it 
is  a  section  of  such  an  old  fruit  that  is  shown  in  the  lower  half  of 
Plate  XXI,  which  is  not  characteristic  of  the  fruit  when  in  prime 
condition.  It  is  believed  that  the  Thornton  is  a  valuable  fruit,  and 
it  should  be  tested  thoroughly. 

Pineapple  Hybrids. 

In   the  1905  Yearbook  of    the  Department  five  new  varieties  of 
pineapples  were  described,  namely,  the  Miami,  Seminole,  Eden,  Mat- 
thams,  and  Gale.     Since  that  time  a  considerable  number  of  the 
fruits  of  these  varieties  have  been  carefully  tested,  and  a  limited  dis- 
tribution has  been  made  of  slips  of  three  of  the  varieties.     The  Miami 
has  proven  to  be  one  of  the  best  appearing  fruits  of  the  various 
hybrids,  but,  while  of  fairly  good  quality,  it  is  much  inferior  to  many 
of  the  hybrids  in  this  regard.     It  is,  however,  apparently  a  good 
shipper,  and,  as  its  quality  is  certainly  superior  to  that  of  the  orri- 
nary  varieties  of  pineapples,  it  should  prove  a  desirable  sort.     Tie 
Seminole   and  Gale  produce   fruits  of  exceptional   appearance   aid 
very  high  quality;  both  of  these  varieties,  however,  produce  but  fev 
slips  and  suckers  and  their  propagation  is  thus  very  slow.     This  s 
the  only  important  factor  against  the  general  cultivation  of  thee 
varieties.     The  Matthams  has  proven  to  be  an  all  round  good  sot. 
At  the  Graduate  School  of  Agriculture,  held  at  the  University  >f 
Illinois  in  July,  1906,  the  writer  had  the  pleasure  of  having  a  lare 
number  of  these  hybrids  tested  by  the  various  students  and  instruc- 
ors,  fully  fifty  individuals  taking  part  in  the  test.     A  vote  on  tfe 
quality  of  the  fruits  tested  resulted  in  an  almost  unanimous  vote  1 
favor  of  Matthams  for  first,  Eden  for  second,  and  Miami  for  thid 
plaice.     The  Seminole  and  Gale  were  not  fruiting  in  sufficient  quai- 
3    a  1906 22 


338  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

be  entered  in  this  test,  but  about  forty  different  hybrids  were 

■  1  in  comparison  with  Red  Spanish.     The  Matthams  is  a  yeliow- 

ed  variety  of  a  rich  -  r.  which  on  first  testing  is  likely 

to  be  preferred  by  many  people.     The  writer,  however,  believes  it  to 

be  inferior  in  flavor  to  the  Eden  and  to  the  Deliciosa.  which  is  described 

la.er  in  this  paper. 

In  the  present  paper  7  new  varieties  are  described.  These  are  all 
very  distinct  from  any  of  the  known  varieties,  and  6  of  them  have 
smooth-margined  leaves:  thus  the  experiments  have  resulted  in 
adding  9  smooth-leaved  varieties  to  our  list,  where  only  one  smooth- 
leaved  sort,  the  Smooth  Cayenne,  was  known  at  the  time  the  experi- 
ments were  started.  Since  the  experiments  were  started,  however, 
a  variation  of  the  Red  Spanish  has  gradually  come  into  cultiv 
which  has  nearly  smooth-margined  leaves.  Some  of  the  leaves  of 
this  variation  are  still  in  parts  serrate,  but  unquestionably  a  purely 
smooth-leaved  sort  Can  be  established  by  the  selection  of  slips  from 
plants    showing    the    least   indication   of   spine   development. 

r  has  been  unable  to  learn  the  history  of  this  smooth-leaved 
Red  Spanish,  but  a  considerable  number  of  the  fruits  with  smooth- 
leaved  crowns  can  be  observed  in  the  market,  so  that  it  must  be 
cultivated  to  a  considerable  extent.  These  fruits  seem  usually  to  be 
mixed  with  the  spiny-leaved  Red  Spanish,  as  though  the  smooth- 
leaved  type  had  not  been  distinguished  as  a  distinct  variety. 

The  writer  wishes  to  strongly  impress  upon  growers  the  desirability 
)f  only  taking  slips  and  suckers  for  propagation  frorn  those  plants 
h  have  produced  the  finest  appearing  and  best  fruits.     Several 
)f  the  hybrids  which  are  being  named  and  distributed  produce  fruits 
vhich  have  certain  characters  that  are  variable,  and  some  undesirable 
its  may  be  produced.     Some  varieties  occasionally  produce  too 
•  crowns  or  compound  crowns  of  undesirable  shape.     By  propa- 
gating  only  from  plants   producing  fruits   with  good   crowns   this 
teidency  may  probably  be  easily  bred  out.     In  the  case  of  varieties 
i  as  the  Orlando  and  the  Biscayne.  described  later,  in  which  a 
iderable  number  of  the  plants  produce  no  slips,  this  tendency  will 
daibtless  be  bred  out  in  the  course  of  then  regular  propagation,  as 
tb  preponderating  number  of  slips  will  be  taken  from  prolific  plants. 

THE    DELICIOSA    PINEAPPLE. 
[PLATE  XXII,  FIGURE  1.] 

Pineapple  hybrid  Xo.  9C,  by  all  c^  hose  who  have  assisted  the 
witer  in  testing  hybrids,  has  come  to  be  considered  as  the  standard 
:cellence.  Mr.  W.  A.  Taylor,  of  Penological  Field  Investigations, 
indescribing  this  hybrid,  said:  "If  any  pine  is  entitled  to  the  name 
Diiciosa.  this  is  it.""  Folio  wing  this  suggestion,  the  writer  has  given 
it  name  Delk-wsa  to  this  hvbrid. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture, 


Plate  XXI 


Thornton  Orange.    Natural  Size. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agncultur 


Plate  XXII. 


h  S 


CO  m 


NEW    CITRUS    AXD    PINEAPPLE    PRODUCTION  Sji  339 

The  Deliciosa  is  a  hybrid  of  Envillo  with  pollen  of  Porto  Rico 
and  is  one  of  a  series  of  34  hybrids  developed  from  seeds  of  the 
same  fruit  of  Enville,  a,  number  of  flowers  of  which  were  crossed  by 
Mr.  Swingle  in  the  spring  of:  1S97.  The  first-  fruit  was  produced  in 
1901..  and-  since  that  time  an  increasing  number  of  fruits  has  been 
produced  each  year.  The  Eden  pineapple,  described  in  1905,  is 
also  one  of  this  series  of  hybrids.  A  considerable  number  of  the 
hybrids  of  this  series  are  of  remarkably  high  flavor.  In  the  descrip- 
tion of  the  Eden  (Xo.  90)  the  Deliciosa  was  referred  to  as  probably 
the  best-flavored  fruit,  but  rendered  worthless  for  cultivation  by  its 
small  size  and  very  large  crown.  In  the  summer  of  1908  a  larger 
number  of  fruits  of  the  Deliciosa  have  been  produced  than  in  any 
preceding  year,  and  for  some  reason  they  have  run  considerably 
larger  in  size,  while  the  crowns  have  been  smaller.  The  writer 
interprets  this  change  as  occurring  normally  in  the  clon  as  it  becomes 
older  in  bud-propagated  generations.  In  several  cases,  at  least,  such 
changes  in  clons  or  bud-propagated  varieties  have  been  noted.  In 
sugar  cane,  for  instance,  it  has  been  found  that  the  normal  sugar 
content  of  a  clon  can  not  be  determined  until  it  has  passed  through 
several  bud-propagated  generations.  It  may  be  that  this  improve- 
ment in  the  fruits  of  the  Deliciosa  is  due  to  better  manuring  and 
cultivation,  but,  whatever  the  explanation,  it  would  seem  that,  if 
put  under  good  conditions,  the  variety  will  produce  a  fruit  of  about 
2  to  2|  pounds  weight.  At  best,  however,  it  is  small  and  of  poor 
shape,  and,  as  in  the  case  of  the  Eden,  it  is  only  its  exceptionally 
high  quality  and  flavor  that  justify  its  being  named  and  distributed. 
In  the  case  of  both  the  Deliciosa  and  the  Eden,  however,  it  is  believed 
that  a  special  high-class  market  can  be  found  for  them,  and  in  any 
case  many  growers  will  desire  to  cultivate  a  few  of  them  for  home  use. 
A  technical  description  of  the  Deliciosa  pineapple  follow^: 

De.-;  ription  of  plaxt  and  fruit. — Plant  usually  large  and   spreading;;    leaves 
broad,  recurved,  rigid,  dark  green  in  color,  and  with  a  distinct  central  purplish  stripe 
1  inch  wide;  margin  straight  or  somewhat  undulate,  serrate  or  spiny,  with  closely  set 
medium-sized  reddish  .-pines;  crown  of  medium  to  large  size,  mainly  single  but  sone- 
times  compound;  average  crown  8  to  9  inches  high,  with  spread  of  6  to  7  inches;  ap- 
pearance in  general  rather  long  and  slender  for  shape  of  fruit;  leaves  of  crown  sei 
4  to  10  inches  long  and  from  1  to  1\  inches  wide;  fruit  small,  usually  weighing  from  2  a 
2\  pounds,  conical  in  shape,  being  rather  tall  and  diminishing  gradually  in  size  frcn 
bottom  to  top,  height  5A  to  8  inches,  diameter  3  to  4  inches:  color  of  fruit  in  genenl 
orange  yellow  (by  Ridgway's  standards,  fruits  have  been  found  to  vary  from  dep 
chrome  to  orange  oebxaceous),  the  eye  bracts  frequently  having  a  tinge  of  coral 
the  color  is  often  considerably  hidden  by  a  whitish  scaly  covering  similar  to  the  bloon 
of  other  fruits;  surface  of  fruits  rough:  aroma  usually  strong  and  attractive:  eys 
small,  averaging  about  five-eighths  by  five-eighths  of  an  inch,  similar  to  Enville  i 
shape  and  considerably  protruded:  eye  bracts  medium  in  size,  tip  live-eighths  f 
an  inch  long,  with  serrate  margins  frequently  of  coral  or  Indian  red  color:  generl 
quality  of  fruit  excellenl ;  text  are  very  tender  and  brittle;  flavor  a  very  rich  sweet  su- 
acidj  very  attractive;  flesh  light  yellow  or  cream  yellow,  rather  open;  eye  pita  com- 
paratively shallow;  axis  small,  three-eighths  to  one-half  inch  in  diameter,  com  pa  r- 
tively  tender  and  brittle;  in  most  fruits  being  of  fair  flavor  and  edible;  slips  numerou 
usually  from  3  to  10,  rather  too  close  to  fruit;  suckers  1  to  2:  shipping  quality  appa 
ently  fairly  good;  season  of  ripening  mainly  between  May  15  and  July  1. 


340  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

The  Deliciosa  is  very  different  in  character  from  either  of  the  par- 
ents and  it  is  difficult  to  trace  any  resemblance  to  the  parental  charac- 
ters. The  eyes  are  small  and  considerably  protruded  and  the  fruit  is 
conical  in  shape.  In  these  characters  the  Deliciosa  most  closely  re- 
sembles the  Enville.  which  was  the  mother  parent.  The  very  high 
flavor  is  also  probably  derived  mainly  from  the  Enviile.  though  it  is 
surely  superior  to  the  Enville  in  tins  regard.  In  no  particular  charac- 
ter can  the  influence  of  the  Porto  Rico  be  discerned  and  no  one  would 
suspect  that  the  Porto  Rico  was  one  of  the  parents. 

The  Deliciosa  is  considerably  different  from  its  sister  variety,  the 
Eden,  being  smaller  and  of  darker  orange  ochraceous  color.  The 
crown  is  larger  in  comparison  to  the  fruit,  but  of  the  same  general 
shape.  The  leaves  are  also  more  erect  and  not  so  broad  as  those  of 
the  Eden,  and  the  edges  are  raised,  the  leaves  resembling  a  gutter. 
The  central  stripe  of  the  leaves  is  rather  narrow  and  dark  purple. 
The  fruit,  which  is  elongated  and  tapering,  is  carried  on  a  long  stem. 

The  Deliciosa  is  remarkable  for  its  exceptionally  delicate  and  deli- 
cious flavor  and  its  tender,  brittle  flesh  and  core.  It  is  not  as  juicy 
■me  fruits,  but  is  sufficiently  juicy  to  be  good.  Its  detrimental 
characters  are  its  small  size,  poor  shape  for  shipping,  and  rather 
large  crown.  By  selecting  slips  for  propagation  from  the  largest, 
-shaped  fruits  with  small  crowns,  the  variety  can  doubtless  be 
much  improved.  As  in  the  case  of  the  Eden,  the  writer  would  rec- 
ommend that  the  variety  be  cultivated  for  home  use  and  gradually 
introduced  into  the  market.  If  the  superior  quality  of  this  fruit 
and  the  Eden  for  table  purposes  were  recognized  by  the  market  they 
would  be  in  great  demand. 

THE    DADE   PINEAPPLE. 
LATE  XXII.  FIGURE  2.] 

Pineapple  hybrid  No.  168,  which  has  proven  to  produce  a  fruit  of 

-lent  quality,  is  believed  to  possess  characters  of  merit,  and  for 

variety  the  writer  proposes   the  name  Dade.      This  fruit  is   a 

hybrid  of  Enville  with  pollen  of  Smooth  Cayenne.     The  cross-fertil- 

fruit  which  produced  the  Dade  gave  only  3  seedling-.  Nos.  166, 

If.  and  168.     No.  166,  which  is  a  serrate-leaved  seedling,  has  already 

q  discarded.     No.  167,  winch  is  smooth-leaved  like  Xo.  16S,  is  a 

farly  good  variety  and  is  still  under  trial.     The  Dade  resembles  the 

Errille  in  eye,  size,  and  shape,  and  has  the  smooth-margined  leaves 

life  the  Smooth  Cayenne.     The  first  fruits  of  this  variety  were  pro- 

1  in  1904,  and  since  that  tune  several  fruits  have  been  produced 

yerly.     Following  is  a  technical  description  of  tins  variety: 

Rescript]  and  fruit. — Plant  medium  to  large,  mainly  rather  spread- 

urved.  rather  rigid,  green  to  dark  green  in  a  ilor,  and  usually  with 

..ewhat  indistinct  central  purplish  strir.»e  about  i  inch  wide:  margin  undulate, 

but  in  some  alternately  emooth  and  spiny  or  simply  with  a  few  spines 

x.     Crown  of  medium  to  h   -    -        -ingle:  average  crown  about  8  to  10  inches 

hjh,  with  spread  of  6  to  S  inches,  general  appearance  good;  leaves  of  crown   mainly 


NEW    CITKUS    AND    PINEAPPLE    PRODUCTIONS.  341 

smooth,  from  5  to  6  inches  in  length  and  from  three-fourths  to  1|  inches  in  width, 
rut  her  flaccid,  with  lower  leaves  rather  long  and  frequently  reflexed  over  apex  of  fruit; 
fruit  of  medium  to  small  size,  usually  weighing  from  2\  to  3|  pounds,  ovate  to  conical  in 
shape,  height  from  5  to  7  inches,  diameter  from  3i  to  4h  inches;  color  of  fruit  light  lemon 
yellow  or  orange  chrome:  surface  of  fruit  comparatively  smooth;  aroma  attractive, 
spicy,  fairly  strong;  eves  small  to  medium  in  size,  similar  to  Enville  in  shape,  flat  and 
but  slightly  protruded;  eve  bracts  small  or  medium  in  size,  with  slightly  serrate  mar- 
gins; general  quality  of  fruit  excellent;  texture  tender  and  brittle,  slightly  stringy; 
flavor  a  sweet  subacid  with  little  or  no  acridity;  flesh  yellow,  attractive  in  color,  juicy, 
rather  open;  eve  pits  of  medium  depth:  axis  large,  averaging  about  1  inch  in  diam- 
eter, lender  and  brittle  and  of  fair  edible  quality;  slips  numerous,  ustially  3  to  10,  not 
too  close  to  fruit;  suckers  1  to  2;  season  late,  the  majority  ripening  in  July. 

The  Dade  pineapple  is  inferior  to  the  Deliciosa  in  flavor,  but  is  a 
better-shaped  fruit,  of  good  appearance,  having  mainly  smooth-mar- 
gined leaves.  This  variety,  like  a  number  of  others  of  the  hybrids 
where  a  spiny-leaved  sort  was  crossed  with  the  Smooth  Cayenne, 
seems  to  be  somewhat  in  doubt  what  sort  of  leaves  to  produce;  fre- 
quently a  leaf  will  be  found  which  has  scattered  spines  on  the  margin 
and  occasionally  a  leaf  will  be  almost  wholly  serrate.  In  general, 
however,  it  would  be  ranked  as  a  smooth-leaved  sort.  The  fruit  is 
rather  small  for  the  size  of  the  crown,  but  it  has  a  bright,  attractive 
color  and  good  surface.  It  has  some  tendency  to  develop  a  fruit  of 
slightly  irregular  shape,  being  in  some  cases  slightly  constricted  in  the 
middle.  The  plant  is  of  good,  vigorous  habit;,  and  the  fruit  stem  is 
short  and  stout.  Some  fruits  when  received  have  been  found  to  show 
some  eye-rot,  but  the  variety  in  general  would  probably  ship  well. 
On  the  whole  the  variety  is  probably  not  as  promising  as  some  others, 
but  is  worthy  of  careful  trial  under  different  conditions. 

THE    COQUIXA    PINEAPPLE. 

[PLATE  XXIII,  FIGURE  1.] 

To  this  pineapple  hybrid  No.  169  (Green  Ripley  crossed  with  pollen 
of  Smooth  Cayenne)  has  been  given  the  name  Coquina.  It  is  the  only 
seedling  which  developed  from  a  single  hybridized  fruit,  but  is  of  the 
same  parentage  as  the  Gale,  described  in  the  1905  Yearbook. 

The  seedling  of  the  Coquina  fruited  first  in  1902,  and  in  1905  a  con- 
siderable number  of  fruits  were  produced.  It  adds  another  smooth- 
leaved  sort  to  our  list  of  promising  varieties.  The  illustration  of  this 
fruit  shown  in  Plate  XXIII,  figure  1,  shows  a  poor  fruit  of  the  variety. 
A  technical  description  follows: 

Description  of  flaxt  and  fruit.— Plant  large,  compact  or  somewhat  spreading; 
Leaves  broad,  recurved,  rather  flaccid;  color  light  green,  mainly  without  a  distingiish- 
able  central  band,  but  in  some  specimens  with  an  indistinct  pale  green  band  ahait  1 
inch  wide;  margins  mainly  straight,  but  in  some  cases  slightly  undulate,  smooti,  or 
with  a  few  serrations  at  the  apex;  crown  of  medium  to  large  size,  about  9  inches  ligh 
and  with  spread  of  about  7  inches,  single  and  usually  of  good  shape  and  size  in  connari- 
Bon  with  fruit ;  crown  leaves  5  to  10  inches  long  and  1  inch  wide,  with  smooth  mai  ins; 
fruit  of  good  appearance,  medium  size,  weighing  from  3  to  4  pounds,  oblong  elliptcal, 
aches  in  height  and  from  4}  to  5  inches  in  diameter.  Color  of  fruit  orangi  yel- 
low (by  Ridgway's  standards  deep  chrome);  eyes  small  to  medium,  somewhat  irregllar 
in  shape,  about  medium  in  degree  of  protrusion;  eye  bracts  of  medium  size,  int<  me- 
diate between  smooth  and  serrate;  flesh  rather  open,  moderately  juicy,  of  rich  yelow 
color;  texture  brittle  and  solid,  slightly  stringy;  flavor  subacid,  rich,  sweet,  attractve; 


342  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

-mall,  one-liali  inch  in  diameter,  tough  and  scarcely  edible;  eye  pits  shallow; 
aroma  moderately  strong  and  attractive;  general  appearance  and  quality  excellent; 
;  to  12;  suckers  1  to  4:  season  mainly  July. 

The  Coquina  usually  produces  an  attractive,  good-sized  fruit  with 
good  crown.  The  surface  of  some  fruits  has  been  slightly  cracked  and 
checked,  but  not  sufficiently  to  seriously  injure  its  good  appearance. 
The  flesh  is  of  an  attractive  rich  yellow  color.  The  eyes  in  general 
resemble  those  of  the  Ripley,  the  female  parent,  while  the  crown  and 
smooth  leaves  are  mainly  like  the  Smooth  Cayenne..  The  variety 
produces  a  large  number  of  slips  and  suckers,  and  may  thus  be 
rapidly  propagated.  In  some  fruits  the  slips  are  rather  too  close  to 
the  fruit,  but  seldom  so  close  as  to  seriously  injure  the  fruit  in  cutting 
or  tweaking  it.  While  this  fruit  is  not  equal  to  some  of  the  other 
hybrids  in  quality,  it  is  believed  to  possess  sufficient  merit  to  justify 
its  propagation. 

THE   JUPITER    PINEAPPLE. 

[PLf\TE  XXIII,  FIGURE  2] 

Pineapple  hybrid  No.  L8S  (Green  Ripley  crossed  with  pollen  of 
Smooth  Cayenne)  has  proven  a  very  desirable  sort  in  the  tests  made, 
and  the  writer  has  named  this  variety  the  Jupiter. 

The  Jupiter  is  one  of*  a  series  of  20  hybrids  developed  from  seed  of 
the  same  original  hybrid  fruit.  Many  of  these  seedlings  exhibit  desir- 
able characters,  and  one  of  them,  the  Gale,  was  described  in  the  1905 
Yearbook. 

Following  is  a  technical  description  of  the  variety: 

Description  of  plant  and  fruit. — Plant  of  medium  to  large  size,  spreading; 

haves  broad,  recurved,  rigid;  margin  of  leave-  mainly  more  or  less  undulate,  and 

r  in  some  cases  marly  spiny;  color  of  leaves  green,  in  most  cases  without 

central  stripe1  but  occasionally  showing  indistinct  purplish  central  stripe  about  1  inch 

impound,  of  medium  size,  averaging  about  8  inches 

i!  of  7  inches,  of  good  appearance  and  symmetrical;  crown  leaves  dark 

i.  from  1  to  7  inches  about  1  inch  in  width,  margins  smooth  or  serrate, 

I;  fruit  of  excellent  appearance,  medium  in  size,  weighing 

5  pound-  lliptical,  from  oh  to  7  inches  in  height  and  from  4}  to  5 

:  coloi  of  fruit  dark  orange  (by  Ridgway's  standards  orange  ochra- 

:  medium  size,  about  three-fourths  by  seven-eighths  inch.  flat,  giving  a 

fruit  m  smooth  surface:  eye-  bracts  small  to  medium  in  size,  with  smooth  or  slightly 

serrate-  margins;  flesh  solid,  very  juicy,  yellow,  and  attractive  in  appearance:  texture 

rather  tough  and  slightly  stringy,  in  Borne  cases  the  fruits  being  recorded  as  render,  this 

chars!  !ev.bat:  flavor  subacid  and  sweet:  core  rather  large,  1 

inch  n  diameter,  tender  and  edible,  at  least  in  some  fruits,  recorded  as  tough  in  other 

fruits:  eye  pits  shallow;  aroma  light  but  attractive;  slips  few.  1  to  2.  sometimes  none; 

■n  June  and  July. 

'  Jupiter  is  a  rather  peculiar  hybrid  in  its  variability  when 
propagated  vegetatively,  and  there  is  some  possibility  that  it  will 
prote  too  variable  to  give  satisfactory  results.  Some  of  the  fruits  are 
of  isry  excellent  quality  and  appearance,  while  others  are  but  little 
be  ordinary  in  these  regards.  Some  fruits  have  the  surface 
sligitly  cracked,  but  this  in  the  fruits  examined  has  not  detracted 
-  from  the  appearance.  The  foliage  presents  a  peculiar  inter- 
file of  the  spiny  and  smooth  character  of  the  two  parental  varie- 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XXIII. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XXIV. 


NEW    CITKUS    AXD    PINEAPPLE    PRODUCTIONS.  343 

leraJ  fcbe  leaves  h  "th  reaggias,  but  some  B 

spiny  throughout,  while  others  have  scattered  r  grou] 

spin-  anged  OBt  the  margin,  still  others  being  spiny 

e  apex. 
The  fruit  of  the  Jupiter  is.  in  general,  about  the  same  size  and  sb 
m  Red  Spanish,  being  thus  of  good  market  size  and  shape.     It  is 
apparently  a  good  keeper.     This  variety  gives  evidence  of  bei: 
good  canning  sort,  as  it  peels  economically,  and  the  core  is  soft  enough 
in  general,  so  that  it  probably  can  be  sliced  without  cutting  out  the 
core.     The  solidity  of  the  flesh  and  the  sweetness  of  the  variety  also 
recommend  it  for  this  purpose.     In  flavor  and  quality  the  Jupiter  is 
certainly  inferior  to  a  number  of  the  hybrids,  but  it  is  superior  in  these 
respects  to  many  of  the  varieties  commonly  cultivated. 

THE    JEXSEX    PIXF.APPLE. 
[PLATE  XXIV,  riGTRE  1.] 

Pineapple  hybrid  Xo.  17  is  a  cross  of  Green  Ripley  with  pollen  of 

Smooth  Cayenne.     It  is  one  of  24  seedlings  grown  from  a  single  fruit 

of  Ripley  which  was  cross-pollinated  in  1898.     Xone  of  the  other  seed- 

of  this  series  has  thus  far  proved  valuable,  and  the  majority  of 

them  have  already  been  discarded.     A  few,  however,  are  still  under 

The  first  fruit  of  the  Jensen  was  produced.,  in  100:?,  and  in  1905 

and   1906   a  considerable  number  of  line  fruits  were  produced.     A 

technical  description  of  the  variety  follows: 

Description  of  r-LAXT  and  nu*rr. — Plant  medium  to  large,  compact  or  somewhat 
.ing:  leaves  of  medium  width  to  broach  recurved,  rigid;  color  green  or 
green  without  central  band  or  with  an  indistinct  purplish  band  about  1  inch  in  width: 
niacins  more  or  less  undulate,  smooth  or  spiny  at  i  n  single,  of  medium 

coin}'.        •  inches  in  height,  with  spread  el  from  4  to  S  inches,  of  excellent  - 

and  appearance:  crown  leaves  from  4  to  I  inches  in  length  and  from  thr     - 

ich  in  width,  with  smooth  margins,  frequently  with  very  distinct  purplish  bands 
Lriiits  strongly  rerlex^-.l  over  apex  of  fruit;  fruit  of  excellent  appear- 
.  medium  size,  weighing  from  2  to  4  pounds,  oblong,  conical.  5  i  :■_  o]  inch's  in 
•    and  3}  to  4\  inches  in  diameter:  color  light  Lk>W;   by  Ridgway's 

•leep  chrome:  i  hum  size,  seven-eighths  by  s*>ven- 

eigfitbs  inch,  somewhat  protruded  or  nearly  liar .  giving  a  good  sunace:  eye  1 
small  or  medium  in  size,  with  smooth  or  slightly  iargins:  rlesh  solid,  very 

juicy,  of  rich  yellow  attractive  color:  texture  very  tender,  soft,  and  stringless:  flavor 
a  rich,  sprightly  acid,  very  attractive,  and  with  very  little  indication  of  acridity: 
small,  one-ltidf  to  five-eighths  inch  in  diameter,  tender  and  edible:  eye  pits  siu 
aroma  fairly  strong  and  attractive:  slips  usually  about  5  or  6,  in  some  cases  nther 
too  close  to  the  fruit :  suckers  1  1 3  2 :  season  June  and  July . 

The  Jensen  pineapple  produces  a  very  bright,  finely  coined. 
attractive  fruit  of  good  shipping  size,  with  symmetrical  crown.  The 
eyes  protrude  but  little,  so  that  the  surface  is  fairly  smooth.  Lithe 
eye  character  and  hi  shape  and  size  of  fruit  it  is  much  like  Ripley, 
the  female  parent,  but  fortunately  it  has  inherited  the  smooth  lerces 
of  the  male  parent.  While  the  traits  are  solid  and  very  juicy,  the 
majority  of  them  have  reached  Washington  hi  excellent  conditon, 
with  little  sign  of  roiling.  It  is  probable,  therefore,  mat  the  friits 
will  be  found  to  be  fairly  good  shippers.  On  some  there  is  a  }ro- 
nounced  neck  between  the  fruit  and  the  crown,  but  this  hi  no  vay 


344  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

detracts  from  the  excellent  appearance  of  the  fruit.  The  flavor  of 
the  Jensen  is  a  sprightly  acid,  but  it  is  nevertheless  sweet,  spicy,  and 
of  high  quality.  The  flesh  is  remarkably  juicy  and  tender  and  can  be 
eaten  very  close  to  the  surface.  Withal,  the  Jensen  is  believed  to 
be  a  verv  valuable  variety,  worthy  of  general  cultivation.  Because 
of  its  shallow  eyes,  solid,  juicy  flesh,  and  tender  core  it  may  also  prove 
a  good  canning  sort. 

THE    ORLANDO    PINEAPPLE. 
[PLATE  XXIV.  FIGURE  2.] 

Pineapple  hybrid  Xo.  212.  a  cross  of  Green  Ripley  with  pollen  of 
the  Smooth  Cayenne,  is  one  of  the  best  appearing  and  most  prom- 
ising of  the  various  sorts  under  trial.  For  this  variety  the  writer 
proposes  the  name  Orlando.  The  fruit  of  the  Orlando  is  very  dif- 
ferent from  either  of  the  parental  varieties  or  from  any  other  of  the 
known  varieties.  It  has  smooth,  entire-margined  leaves  like  the 
Smooth  Cayenne,  but  differs  from  that  variety  in  shape  and  size  of 
fruit  and  in  having  much  smaller  eyes.  In  eye  characters  the 
Orlando  somewhat  resembles  the  Ripley,  but  could  not  be  mistaken 
for  that  variety.  The  cross  which  resulted  in  the  Orlando  was  made 
in  the  spring  of  1898,  and  the  first  fruit  was  produced  in  1903.  Fol- 
lowing is  a  technical  description  of  the  variety: 

Description"  of  plaxt  axd  fruit. — Plants  small  to  medium  in  size,  compact  or 
somewhat  spreading,  light  green:  leaves  broad,  recurved,  rigid,  mainly  without  cen- 
tral band,  but  occasionally  with  indistinct  purplish  or  yellowish  band  about  three- 
fourths  inch  wide:  margin  of  leaves  undulate,  smooth,  and  spineless,  or  at  least  with 
only  a  few  spines  at  the  apex:  crown  single,  of  medium  size  and  excellent  appearance, 
10  inches  high,  with  spread  of  4  to  S  inches:  width  of  crown  leaves  three-fourths 
to  1  inch:  fruit  of  excellent  appearance,  but  rather  small  in  size,  weighing  from  1  to 
4£  pounds,  and  usually  averaging  about  2^  pounds,  ovate  oblong,  4  to  S  inches  high 
and  from  3  to  5  inches  in  diameter;  color  in  general  a  bright  orange  ibyRidgway's 
standards  between  orange  and  orange  ochraceous.  with  the  base  of  the  eye  bracts 
ochraceous  buff);  surface  medium  in  smoothness  and  attractive  in  appearance;  aroma 
light  but  pleasant:  eyes  small  to  medium,  three-fourths  by  three-fourths  inch:  in 
il  flat  or  intermediate  in  degree  of  protrusion:  eye  bracts  small  to  medium  in 
size,  x-ith  smooth  margins:  general  quality  of  fruit  excellent,  very  juicy,  texture 
usually  brittle  and  tender,  with  slight  stringiness:  flavor  a  rich,  sweet  subacid  if  not 
overripe,  very  pleasant  and  spicy,  with  very  slight  acridity;  flesh  yellow,  solid:  eye 
pits  usually  very  shallow:  axis  small,  averaging  about  three-eighths  of  an  inch  in 
diameter,  usually  rather  tough  and  with  little  flavor,  but  in  some  fruits  tend* 
ediblt;  slips  rather  few.  in  some  fruits  3  to  6.  in  others  none:  not  too  close  to  the  fruit; 
suckers  1  to  4:  season  mainly  June  and  July. 

Tie  fruit  of  the  Orlando  in  general  is  very  fine  in  symmetry,  appear- 
ance, and  all  those  characters  which  go  to  make  up  an  excellent 
variity.  The  color  is  rich  and  attractive.  In  some  fruits  the  eye 
brads  are  somewhat  cracked  at  the  base,  but  this  has  in  no 
seriously  detracted  from  the  general  good  appearance.  Some  of  the 
fruit  are  too  small  in  size,  but  they  are  usually  large  enough  to  suit 
the  market.  In  quality,  the  Orlando  v. ill  rank  very  high,  if  eaten 
before  it  is  overripe.  When  the  fruit  ages,  it  is  liable  to  become 
sonewhat  water-logged  and  too  sweet  to  suit  the  majority  of 
tastes.     It  is  difficult  to  determine  the  season  of  a  pineapple  until  it  is 


NEW    CITRUS    AND    PINEAPPLE    PRODUCTIONS.  345 

grown  on  a  fairly  large  scale.  The  Majority  of  the  fruits  of  the 
Orlando  have  ripened  in  June  and  July,  but  some  have  been  har- 
vested in  December.  There  is  little  waste  to  this  variety,  as  the 
shallow  eyes  allow  it  to  be  peeled  very  thin.  A  feature  of  importance 
in  connection  with  this  fruit  is  the  possibility,  owing  to  its  small  size, 
of  its  being  a  desirable  sort  to  use  as  the  Natal  variety  is  used  in 
South  Africa,  according  to  the  observations  of  Mr.  D.  G.  Fairchild. 
There  single  fruits  of  the  Natal  are  commonly  purchased  by  pedes- 
trians on  the  streets,  peeled  and  eaten  much  as  we  eat  apples  in  this 
country.  The  fruit  of  the  Orlando  peels  without  much  waste,  and  is 
normally  of  small  size.  If  the  plants  were  grown  considerably 
crowded  together  it  is  probable  that  numerous  fruits  of  three- 
fourths  to  1  pound  weight  could  be  produced,  which,  owing  to  their 
excellent  appearance  and  smooth  leaves,  would  be  well  adapted  to  use 
in  this  way.  For  such  use  they  would  probably  be  superior  to  the 
Natal,  primarily  because  of  their  smooth  leaves. 

THE    BISCAYXE    PINEAPPLE. 

[PLATE  XXIV,  FIGURE  3.] 

Pineapple  hybrid  No.  228,  a  cross  of  Pernambuco  with  pollen  of 
Porto  Rico,  is  one  of  the  finest  appearing  and  best  of  the  various 
hybrids  with  smooth  leaves  which  have  been  secured  by  the  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture,  and  has  been  named  after  the  beautiful  Bay  Bis- 
cay ne,  on  the  shores  of  which  it  has  been  grown.  The  original 
crossed  fruit  from  which  the  Biscayne  developed  gave  35  seedlings, 
31  of  which  have  fruited.  Either  the  plants  or  the  numbers  of  the 
other  4  were  lost.  Of  these  31  seedlings,  21  have  entire  or  smooth 
leaves,  while  10  have  serrate  leaves.  In  this  case  both  parents  have 
serrate  leaves,  and  it  is  difficult  to  account  for  the  preponderating 
number  of  smooth-leaved  plants  among  the  hybrids.  The  proportion 
is  exactly  what  would  be  expected  in  crossing  a  smooth  with  a  spiny- 
leaved  sort  when  the  smooth  character  is  dominant.  It  is  difficult  to 
understand  how  an  error  could  have  been  made  in  the  fruits,  but  the 
writer  would  be  inclined  to  believe  from  the  characters  of  the  various 
hybrids  that  the  Smooth  Cayenne  was  used  as  the  male  parent 
instead  of  the  Porto  Rico.  None  of  the  other  hybrids  of  this  series 
has  thus  far  been  selected  for  propagation,  though  several  of  them 
are  still  under  trial.  The  first  fruit  of  the  Biscayne  was  produced 
in  1902,  and  a  considerable  number  of  the  fruits  have  since  been 
grown  and  tested.     Following  is  a  technical  description  of  the  variety: 

Description  of  plant  and  fruit.— Plant  medium  to  large  in  size,  spreading  or 
somewhat  compact .  green  or  green  suffused  with  purple;  leaves  broad,  recurved,  rigid, 
with  purplish  central  band  about  1  inch  wide;  margin  straight  or  undulate;  smooth  or 
entire  except  lor  few  spines  at  apex  of  leaves;  crown  single  or  compound,  of  medium 
size  and  usually  excellent  appearance,  3  to  6  inches  high,  with  spread  of  from  4  to  6 
inches;  crown  leaves  usually  rather  narrow,  from  one-half  to  seven-eighths  of  an  inch; 


346  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    I  L  -VIZ. 

■A  exeeUea 
obloi  _  and  3|  to  5  inches 

Ridgway  ?s  stac 

i  11  to  medium  in  .        -  _ 

foun 

small  -half  inch  I  m 

of  fruit  excellent,  jui 

- 

diam 

1  to  3:  season.  June  to  July. 

The  Biscavne  is  somewhat   similar 

-ie  Orlando.  It  is  different  in  shape  and  appearance  of  surface. 
however,  and  is  istingui- 

fully  compared.      Thee:  I        ..yre  isfreqi: 

and  in  some  cases  this  detracts  from  the  appearance  of  ti. 
In  no  case,  however,  has  the  crown  been  so  large  and  compound  I 
injure  the  character  of  the  apex  of  the  fruit,   and  the  compound 
nature  of  the  crown  has  seldom  detracted  seriously  from  the 
ance  of  the  fruit.     The  surface  of  the  fruit  is  par:  :md 

even  under  these   conditions  the   ey  nparativ 

Ordinarily  fruits  with  flat  eyes  hfti  while  i:  -  are 

strongly  protruded  the  eye  pits  are  usv  .ape  the 

Biscavne  is  rather  remarkable.     Xo  variety  known    to    the  wi 

ms  in  so  marked  degree  its  full  diameter  entirely  to  the  apex.  In 
almost  all  qualities  the  Biscavne  is  an  excellent  pineapple,  and  is 
believed  to  be  worthy  of  general  propagation. 


DISTRIBUTION  OF  TUBERCULIN  AND  MALLEIN  BY  THE 
BUREAU  OF  ANIMAL  INDUSTRY. 

By  M.  Dorset. 
hemic  Division,  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry. 

IMPORTAXCE    OF    EARLY    DIAGNOSIS    OF    INFECTIOUS    DISEASES. 

In  order  to  cope  successfully  with  infectious  diseases  we  must  pos- 
sess means  for  their  early  recognition.  for,  aside  from  the  very  great 
advantages  which  are  thus  obtained  in  cases  where  treatment  is  to  be 
applied,  an  early  diagnosis  enables  us  to  protect,  by  methods  of  quar- 
antine and  disinfect  ion.  healthy  individuals  that  might  otherwise  be 
exposed  to  the  contagion.  Indeed,  the  success  of  any  struggle  with 
an  infectious  disease  which  is  spread  by  contact  of  healthy  individuals 
with  those  that  are  diseased  may  be  measured  directly  by  the  certainty 
with  which  the  disease  in  question  can  be  recognized.  This  fact  is 
obvious  when  it  is  remembered  that  infectious  diseases  are  each 
caused  by  a  specific  micro-organism  and  that  these  micro-organisms 
are,  in  many  diseases,  discharged  from  the  infected  individual  in  large 
numbers.  The  longer  the  disease  remains  undiscovered  the  greater 
is  the  danger  of  the  infection  of  other  animals,  which  in  their  turn 
act  as  distributing  agents  for  the  virus. 

Among  the  infectious  diseases  which  affect  cattle  and  horses,  and 
which  we  are  forced  to  combat  chiefly  by  methods  of  quarantine. 
probably  none  cause  greater  losses  in  this  country  than  tuberculosis 
of  cattle  and  glanders  of  horses.  It  happens,  also,  that  these  two 
diseases  are.  in  their  early  stages,  among  the  most  difficult  to  recog- 
nize.- and  this  is  especially  true  of  tuberculosis.  The  onset  is  fre- 
quently insidious:  the  animal  may  remain  apparently  well  when  the 
disease  is  far  advanced,  and  the  infecting  organisms  may  be  discharged 
in  large  numbers,  even  though  no  lesion  can  be  demonstrated  by.  the 
usual  clinical  examination: 

Under  these  circumstances  it  is  indeed  fortunate  that  for  b«  th 
tuberculosis  in  cattle  and  glanders  in  horses  we  p  specific  diag- 

nostic agents  to  aid  and  supplement  the  clinical  examination.     Tl 
diagnostic  agents,  which  are  known  as  tuberculin  and  mallein,  are 
derived  from  the  bacteria  which  cause  the  two  diseases,  and  are  n<  w 
regarded  as  indispensable  in  any  attempt  to  eradicate  these  diseases 

if  a  successful  result  is  to  be  attained. 

347 


.'.--  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

In  order  that  the  mode  of  applying  these  substances  in  dealing  with 
tuberculosis  and  glanders  may  be  more  readily  understood,  it  may  be 
well  to  relate  briefly  the  history  of  the  discovery  of  tuberculin  and 
mallein.  and  the  manner  of  fighting  d  their  use. 

TUBERCULIN    AND    ITS    Ufi 

As  is  now  quite  generally  known.  Prof.  Robert  Koch,  in  the  year 
1890.  first  recommended  the  use  of  a  solution  prepared  from  pure 
cultures  of  the  tuberculosis  bacillus  for  the  treatment  of  tubercui 
All  live  bacilli  in  glycerinated  bouillon  cultures  of  this  bacillus  were 
first  destroyed  by  heat  and  removed  by  filtration.  The  filtrate, 
evaporated  to  a  small  bulk,  constituted  the  tuberculin  and  consisted 
of  the  soluble  and  noncoagulable  portions  of  the  culture  medium, 
together  with  those  products  of  the  growth  of  the  tubercle  bacilli  and 
those  portions  of  the  bacterial  cells  which  were  like  ise  -  table  and 
not  coagulable  by  heat. 

Professor  Koch  observed  that  minute  quantities  of  this  tuberculin, 
injected  under  the  skin  of  tuberculous  animals,  exercised  a  specific 
stimulating  action  upon  the  tuberculous  foci  and  at  the  same  time 
produced  a  systemic  reaction,  which  was  characterized  by  a  marked 
rise  in  temperature  a  few  hours  after  the  injection.  Tuberculin  was 
originally  thought  to  p  ssess  musual  value  as  a  curative  agent. 
Although  P:  Koch's  expectations  in  this  respect  were  not  borne 

out  by  numerous  practical  tests,  his  discovery  had  a  far-reaching 
influence  upon  the  very  futile  struggle  which  had  hitherto  ber 
against   tuberculosis  in    cattle:  for  hardly  had   his   discovery  been 
announced  before  the  specific  reaction  produced  in  tuberculous  indi- 
viduals by  tuberculin  was  recognized  as  a  possible  means  of  diag: 
in  obscure  cases  of  bovine  tubercui. 

Experiments  to  determine  the  value  of  the  use  of  tuberculin  for 
this  purpose  were  begun  immediately  by  veterinarians  in  all  par 
the  world,  and  the  literature  of  the  past  fifteen  years  is  filled  with  the 
records  of  their  work.  Without  attempting  to  review  these  experi- 
ments in  detail,  it  may  be  stated  that  while  some  have  reported 
adversely  upon  the  use  of  tuberculin  as  a  diagnostic  agent,  the  failures 
were,  in  many  instances,  due  to  a  faulty  application  of  the  test  or  to 
improper  interpretations  of  the  results  obtained.  There  appear  to  be 
possible  sources  of  error  in  connection  with  the  tuberculin  test: 
(1)  Apparent  reactions  in  healthy  cattle  and  (2)  a  failure  of  tubercu- 
lous cattle  to  react  to  the  te- 

In  regard  to  the  first-mentioned  p<>  authorities  are 

agreed  that  this  source  of  error  is  exceedingly  small,  if.  indeed,  it 

s  at  all.     Xocard.  the  eminent  French  authority,  has  stated  that 

-itive  tuberculin  reaction  is  absolute  proof  of  tuberculosis,  and 

if  a  post-mortem  examination  fails  to  reveal  tuberculosis  we  have 


DISTRIBUTION    OF    TUBERCULIN    AND    MALLEIN.  349 

evidence  not  of  the  inexactness  of  tuberculin,  but  of  its  extreme  deli- 
cacy in  revealing  lesions  which  are  too  minute  to  be  discoverable  by 
the  ordinary  methods  of  post-mortem  examination. 

On  the  other  hand,  experience  has  shown  that  a  very  small  percent- 
age of  tuberculous  cattle  may  fail  to  react  to  the  test,  though  this  is 
not  a  serious  objection,  for  the  reason  that  the  failures  of  this  kind 
are  usually  observed  in  advanced  cases  of  the  disease,  which  can  be 
readily  recognized  by  the  ordinary  physical  examination.  It  is  a 
curious  fact  that  cattle  which  are  affected  with  tuberculosis  in  an 
exceedingly  slight  degree  may  exhibit  much  more  pronounced  reac- 
tions than  others  which  are  extensively  diseased. 

There  can  be  no  doubt  that  the  tuberculin  test  is  a  remarkably 
accurate  means  of  detecting  tuberculosis  in  cattle,  and  the  methods 
employed  for  ridding  a  herd  of  this  disease  without  destroying  even 
the  affected  animals  will  be  readily  understood.  In  the  early  days  of 
the  application  of  the  test  it  was  the  common  practice  to  test  the 
entire  herd  and  then  to  destroy  all  reacting  animals.  This  has  been 
found  to  be  in  most  cases  unnecessary  and  undesirable  unless  the 
number  of  reacting  cattle  is  small  and  the  animals  not  of  particular 
value.  The  practice  most  generally  followed  is  known  as  the  ' '  Bang 
method"  of  dealing  with,  tuberculosis,  so  named  after  the  originator  of 
the  system.  By  this  method  the  entire  herd  from  which  tuberculosis 
is  to  be  eradicated  is  subjected  to  the  tuberculin  test.  All  of  the 
animals  which  fail  to  react  are  immediately  removed  to  new  quarters 
and  kaept  entirely  separate  from  the  reacting  animals  of  the  herd.  The 
latter  may  be  fattened  and  slaughtered  subject  to  post-mortem 
examination,  or  they  may  be  used  for  breeding  purposes  if  they  are 
high-grade  stock.  Tuberculosis  is  extremely  rarely  transmitted  from 
parent  to  offspring,  and  if  calves  of  tuberculous  cows  are  removed  from 
their  mothers  immediately  after  birth  they  may  be  placed  with  the 
healthy  portion  of  the  herd  and  fed  with  boiled  milk  from  the  tubercu- 
lous cows  or  raw  milk  from  the  healthy  cows.  Within  six  months  or  a 
year  the  healthy  portion  of  the  herd  should  be  retested  and  the  react- 
ing animals,  which  will  probably  be  comparatively  few,  should  be 
immediately  removed  from  the  healthy  ones  as  in  the  first  instance. 
If  this  system  be  carefully  followed,  with  regular  retests  of  the  non- 
reacting  portion  of  the  herd,  tuberculosis  can  be  eradicated  within  a 
few  years  at  comparatively  small  cost  to  the  owner  and  with  a  tremen- 
dous gain  in  the  productiveness  of  the  herd.  It  has  been  quite  defi- 
nitely proven  that  tuberculin  does  not  injure  healthy  cattle,  nor  does 
it  render  the  milk  unwholesome. 

MALLEIN  AND   ITS   USE. 

The  methods  used  for  preparing  mallein  and  the  manner  of  applying 
this  test  for  glanders  are  quite  similar  to  those  used  in  the  case  of 


350     YEARBOOK  OF  THE  DEPART: 

tuberculin.     In  foot,  the  use  of  mullein  was  a  direct  outgrowth  of 
experiments  made  with  tuberculin.     The  bacillus  of  glanders  Bo<: 
mallei)  is  grown  in  pure  culture  upon  artificially  prepared,  media  and 
the    soluble    noncoagulable    portions    of    the    bacterial    growth,   are 
dieted.     This  exrract  is  preserved  by  means  of  some  suitable  i 
:     and  is  injected  subcutaneously  into  horses  suspected  of  being 
affected  with  glanders.     Tnfi  reaction  obtained  in  diseased  ho: 
the  same  general  nature  as  that  obtained  by  injecting  tuberculin  into 
tuberculous  cattle,  though  there  are  certain  difference  -  b  the 

form  of  the  fever  curve.     In  horses  reacting  to  nialleiii  there  is  also 
usually  a  marked  swelling  of  the  tissues  around  tto  at  which  the 

maliein  was  injected.     This  swelling,  which  does  not  occur  in  tubercu- 

rter  a  tuberculin  injection,  is  one  of  the  character- 
features  of  the  reaction  of  glandered  horses  to  maliein. 

In      I  be  reliability  of  the  maliein  test,  it  must  be  ackn 

edged  that,  although  a  reaction  to  maliein  or  a  failure  to  rea 
generally  a   correct  indication  of   the  existence  or  nonexistence  of 
glanders,  the  results  i  f  this  test  can  not  be  accepted  with  the  a 

a  that  follows  a  properly  applied  tuberculin  t 
been  cases  in  which  apparently  typical  reactions  were  obtained  with 
maliein,  although  the  horses  tested  exhibited  no  symptoms  what 
of  the  disease:  and  likewise  failures  have  been  recorded  in  v 
appeared  to  be  undoubted  cases  of  glanders. 

It  is  the  general  opinion,  however,  among  those  who  have  had 
experience  in  the  practical  use  of  maliein.  that  it  is  a  very  valuable 
aid  in  the  diagnosis  of  glanders,  and  it  seems  not  unreasonable  to  hope 
that  improvements  in  the  present  technique  employed  in  making 
this  test,  together  with  a  fuller  knowledge  of  the  mechanism  of  the 
I  ion,  will  eventually  produce  even  more  trustworthy  results  than 
those  now  obtained. 

In  combating  glanders  the  general  practice  is  to  destroy  h 
which  are  positively  known  to  be  affected  with  the  disease  and  to 
quarantine  those  which  are  merely  suspected  of  being  d. 

MAZvS"ER    OF    DISTRIBUTING    TUBERCULIN    AXD    MALLELX. 

In  order  to  be  in  a  position  to  enforce  more  effectively  its  quarantine 
regulations,  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  began  in  the  year  1893  the 
preparation  of  both  tuberculin  and  maliein.  and  it  was  de  the 

b  time  to  supply  these  substances  free  of  charge  to  properly  con- 
stituted health  cfheers  and  official  veterinarians  in  the  various  i 

Territories.     This  distribution  was  undertaken  for  the  purp<  - 
cooperating  with  State  officials  in  their  efforts  to  restrict  and  eradi 
infectious  diseases  under  authority  conferred  upon  the  Seer, 
of  Agriculture  by  act  of  Congress. 

This  distribution  is  restricted  to  Federal,  State,  county,  or  city 
officials,  who  are  supplied  with  tuberculin  and  maliein  upon  their 


DISTRIBUTION    OF    TUBERCULIN    AND    MALLEIN. 


351 


agreeing  to  furnish  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  with  records  of 
all  tests  and  with  the  results  of  the  autopsies  on  all  animals  that  are 
slaughtered,  and  upon  the  further  understanding  that  all  tests  shall 
be  conducted  under  their  supervision  by  practitioners  who  are  skilled 
in  the  use  of  tuberculin  and  mallein.  In  addition  to  furnishing 
tuberculin  to  the  above-mentioned  officials,  considerable  quantities 
have  been  sent  to  inspectors  of  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  sta- 
tioned at  various  places  along  the  Canadian  border  and  at  other 
points  where  cattle  are  offered  for  importation  without  the  required 
certificates  of  freedom  from  tuberculosis.  In  order  to  carry  out  more 
effectively  the  plan  to  exclude  tuberculous  cattle  from  this  country, 
an  inspector  of  the  Bureau  is  stationed  in  England,  and  there  tests 
all  cattle  intended  for  export  to  the  United  States  and  refuses  cer- 
tificates to  those  found  to  be  diseased. 

As  was  to  be  expected,  in  the  first  few  years  after  the  preparation 
of  tuberculin  and  mallein  was  undertaken  by  the  Bureau  of  Animal 
Industry  comparatively  small  quantities  were  sent  out.  But  the 
demand  for  these  substances  has  steadily  increased,  this  increased 
demand  being  especially  noticeable  during  the  last  few  years.  In  the 
fiscal  year  ended  June  30,  1906,  somewhat  more  than  103,000  doses 
of  tuberculin  and  10,000  doses  of  mallein  were  supplied  to  officials 
in  different  States  and  Territories,  as  follows: 

Distribution  of  tuberculin  and  mullein  in  the  year  ended  June  SO,  1906. 


Distributed  to— 


Alabama 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

do 

Connecticut 

District  of  Columbia . 

England 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 



Mai  no 

Maryland 

I    IMiS'Mts 

Michigan 

ota 

Missouri 

Montana 

Ippi 


Doses. 


Tulweulin.    Mallein. 


24 


754 
16S 


G19 
COO 
130 


120 

221 

2,067 

344 

1,1,90 

288 

19,385 

912 

1,  -.in 

1,304 

203 


12 
151 

12 
252 


516 
2 

54 
272 

12 


45 

4,110 

20 


Distributed  to- 


Nebraska 

Xt'.v  Jersey 

New  Mexico 

New  York 

North  Carolina. . . 

North  Dakota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

Porto  Rico 

Rhode  Island 

South  Carolina. . . 

Utah 

Vermont 

Virginia 

War  Department. 

Washington 

Wisconsin 


Total. 


Doses. 


Tuberculin.   Mallein 


14 

1,008 

78 

161 

l,.'.Mi 

2,944 

1,300 

CO 

731 

50 


30 

6 

734 

19, 674 

139 


12.936 


12 
SC9 
192 
78 
12 


325 
6 

24 
68 
84 


1,612 


IP. 105 


352  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPABTMEXT    OF    AGBICULTV 

The  legislatures  of  a  number  of  the  States  in  the  above  list  have 

-  requiring  that  all  cattle  which  enter  these  States    -hall 

either  prest  ni      proper  certificate  of  freedom  from  tuberculosis  or  else 

pass  the  tuberculin  test  at  the  time  they  enter  the  State:  in  addition, 

ts  of  herds  within  the  State  which  are  suspected  of  being  affected 
with  tuberculosis  are  also  provided  for.  These  tests  are  usually  con- 
ducted by  a  live-sl  k  -military  commission  or  by  the  State  board  of 
health,  and  are  compulsory  in  som-  S  -  and  made  upon  request 
in  others.  In  many  of  the  States  having  specific  laws  covering  this 
subject  the  reacting  cattle  are  red  subject  to  post-mortem 

inspection  and  the  owner  is  paid  a  certain  percentage  of  the  appraised 
value  of  the  condemned  animals.  Similar  regulations  are  in  force 
concerning  glanders.  In  addition  to  supplying  these  State  boards, 
the  Bureau  furnishes  a  considerable  quantity  of  tuberculin  to  city 
officials  whose  duty  it  is  to  detect  tuberculosis  in  the  dairy  herds 
from  which  the  citys  milk  supply  is  derived. 

the  disteibut: 

The  results  achieved  by  the  distribution  of  tuberculin  by  the  Bureau 
.iiirnal  Industry  are  best  appreciated  by  referring  to  the  reports 
of  the  several  5ta1  that  have  had  supervision  over  the  use  of 

tuberculin  supplied  them  by  this  Department.  These  officials  have 
received  from  the  Department  in  the  last  ten;  a  round  numbers. 

,000  doses  of  tuberculin.  "This  tuberculin  has  been  used  almost 
exclusively  for  testing  dairy  cattle,  and  the  reports  show  a  percentage 
of  tuberculosis  in  these  herds  which  varies  from  1  to  SO  per  cent,  or 
.  more  in  some  instances.  The  average  percentage  of  tubercu- 
I  sis  in  dairy  herds  revealed  by  these  tests  certainly  falls  very  little, 
if  any.  below  5  per  cent  of  the  umber  tested.     In  the  vast 

majority  of  cases  the  diseased  anim.  been  removed  from  the 

herds,  either  by  quarantine  or  ghter.     It  appears,  therefore, 

that  not  less  than  25,000  tuberculous  cattle  have  been  removed  from 
our  dairy  herds  through  the  agency  of  this  governmental  distribution 
of  tuberculin.  The  great  gain  which  must  ultimately  result  to  the 
owners  of  the  herds  from  which  these  ini  individuals  have  been 

removed  is  seen  in  reports  of  retests  of  herds  which  were  found  highly 
tuberculous  upon  the  first  examination.  All  reports  bearing  upon  this 
subject  show  that  the  number  of  reacting  animals  in  the  second  test 
11 — at  times  none — and  the  owners  are  thus  being  enabled 
to  rid  their  herds  of  the  most  serious  menace  winch  confronts  them. 
>:>r  are  the  benefits  derived  from  this  work  to  be  measured  by  an 
economic  standard  only,  for  an  even  more  important  object  is  being 
attained — the  protection  of  the  public  health.  The  consensus  of 
-     mtific  opinion  now  is  that  bovine  tuberculosis  is  transmissible  to 


DISTRIBUTION    OF    TUBERCULIN    AND    MALLEIN.  353 

man,  and  it  is  an  undoubted  fact  that  tuberculous  cattle  frequently 
discharge  tubercle  bacilli  from  their  bodies  through  their  milk,  even 
though  no  demonstrable  lesion  of  the  udder  exists. 

Any  tuberculous  cow  may  therefore  be  a  source  of  real  danger  to 
the  people  who  partake  of  her  milk,  and  in  the  case  of  large  dairies, 
where  the  milk  from  the  whole  herd  is  usually  mixed  together  before 
being  distributed  to  the  consumers,  a  few  tuberculous  cows  may  cause 
the  contamination  of  large  quantities  of  milk.  This  mixing  together 
of  milk  serves  to  distribute  the  infective  bacilli  through  all  of  the 
dairy  products,  thereby  increasing  greatly  the  number  of  persons 
exposed  to -the  infection.  The  good  which  has  been  accomplished  by 
the  removal  of  the  25,000  tuberculous  cows  from  dairy  herds  in  this 
country  is  thus  seen  to  be  much  greater  than  would  be  at  first  sup- 
posed, for  it  is  probable  that  the  milk  from  at  least  five  times  as  many 
cows  has  been  rendered  wholesome  by  the  removal  of  these  distribu- 
ters of  the  tuberculosis  virus. 

The  good  which  has  resulted  from  the  distribution  of  mallein  can 
not  be  so  readily  determined,  but  it  can  not  be  doubted  that  the 
destruction  of  the  many  glandered  horses  which  have  reacted  to  the 
mallein  test  has  protected  many  others  from  the  infection.  And  in 
the  case  of  glanders  the  diseased  horse  is  not  only  a  menace  to 
others  belonging  to  the  same  owner,  but  to  horses  that  are  exposed 
to  infection  through  the  agency  of  the  public  drinking  troughs  which 
are  maintained  in  most  of  our  cities. 

Quite  apart  from  this  distribution  of  mallein  to  civilian  authori- 
ties must  be  considered  the  supplies  which  have  been  furnished  the 
War  Department.  The  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  has  been  ready 
at  all  times  to  furnish  mallein  to  that  Department,  and  upon  the 
request  of  the  Quartermaster-General  has  sent  out  many  thousand 
doses.  During  the  war  with  Spain  large  quantities  of  mallein  pre- 
pared in  these  laboratories  were  used  for  testing  the  horses  and  mules 
purchased  for  the  use  of  the  Army,  and  the  facilities  for  preparing 
mallein  are  such  that  large  supplies  are  always  available. 

It  is  hoped  and  believed  by  the  Department  that,  in  addition  to  the 
actual  benefit  derived  by  stock  raisers  from  the  tests  which  have  been 
carried  out,  the  educational  value  of  the  work  has  been  of  great 
advantage  to  stock-raising  communities.  For  it  is  reasonable  to  sup- 
pose that  a  dairyman  who  has  once  had  his  herd  freed  from,  tuber- 
culosis will  not  knowingly  again  introduce  the  disease  among  his 
cattle.  He  will  insist  upon  a  tuberculin  test  of  all  animals  which  are 
purchased,  and  this  demand  on  the  part  of  the  purchaser  for  healthy 
cattle  will  force  upon  breeders  and  raisers  the  necessity  of  supplying 
them. 

3    a  190(3 23 


354         YEARBOOK  or  THE  department  of  agriculture. 

Ii  seems  not  unreasonable  to  believe  that  if  this  testing  of  cattle 
for  tuberculosis  coul  ried  out  on  a  sumcientlv  laree  scale,  and 

if  it  were  in  all  cases  followed  up  by  careful  and  intelligent  quarantine 
measures  with  periodical  retests  of  the  herds,  the  percentage  of  tuber- 
culous cattle  could  at  least  be  reduced  to  a  very  small  fraction  of  that 
which  is  now  known  to  exist.  If  tuberculosis  can  be  eradicated  from 
one  her-.  -  me  can  be  done  for  others.  The  whole  question  would 
seem  to  be  simply  one  of  organization  and  cooperation  between  the 
Federal  and  the  local  authorities  and  the  stock  raisers  themselves. 


PROMISING  NEW  FRUITS. 

By  William  A.  Taylor, 
Pomologist  in  Charge  of  Field  Investigations,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

INTRODUCTION. 

The  question  as  to  what  varieties  of  fruits  and  nuts  to  plant  is  one 
that  confronts  the  orchardist  when  he  contemplates  an  increase  of 
his  orchard  or  vineyard.  Requiring  a  more  or  less  permanent  invest- 
ment of  capital  in  the  form  of  land  and  labor,  as  well  as  cost  of  nursery 
stock,  it  is  essential  that  he  choose  such  varieties  as  shall  not  only 
be  adapted  to  his  climatic  and  soil  conditions,  but  also  to  the  markets 
or  uses  for  which  their  products  are  intended.  The  desires  and  needs 
of  consumers  change  as  time  rolls  on,  so  that  sorts  that  were  once 
profitable  cease  to  be  so,  even  though  they  do  not  deteriorate  in  any 
way;  hence  continual  attention  by  the  grower  to  the  new  sorts  that 
come  to  notice  is  advisable.  A  few  of  the  more  promising  new  varie- 
ties for  cultivation  in  different  sections  of  the  country  are  described 
and  illustrated  here  in  continuation  of  the  series  begun  in  the  Year- 
book for  1901  and  contributed  yearly  since  that  time. 

MAGNATE    APPLE. 

(Synonyms:   Magnet  of  some;  Slayman's  Superior;  Stayman's  No.  1  of  some;  Stay- 
man's  No.  2  of  some.) 

[PLATE   XXV.] 

This  promising  early  winter  variety  is  a  seedling  of  Winesap  which 
originated  with  the  late  Dr.  J.  Stayman,  at  Leavenworth,  Kans.,  in 
1866.°  After  the  original  tree  came  into  bearing  it  appears  to  have 
been  considerably  disseminated  by  the  originator,  in  the  form  of 
scions  for  testing,  from  about  1884  until  his  death,  in  1903.  While  a 
number  of  descriptions  and  outlines  of  the  variety  made  by  Doctor 
Stayman  are  preserved  in  the  extensive  collection  of  such  material 
bequeathed  by  him  to  the  Department  of  Agriculture,  it  is  appar- 
ently impossible  at  this  time  to  determine  under  what  designation 
the  variety  was  first  disseminated. 

It  appears  to  have  reached  Mr.  J.  W.  Kerr,6  Denton,  Md.,  in  the 
winter  of  18S4-85  under  the  designation  "Stayman's  No.  1"  with 
others  of  Doctor  Stayman' s  seedlings  in  the  form  of  scions  from 

a  MS.  notes  of  Dr.  J.  Stayman  in  Pomologieal  Collections,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 
b  Letters  from  J.  W.  Kerr,  December,  1906. 

355 


350  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAPJMEXT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

J.  Silvanus  Gordon.,  of  Sergeantsville.  N.  J.  Mr.  Gordon  had  received 
the  scions  from  Doctor  Stayman  a  short  time  before.0  About  lv^7 
it  reached  the  nursery  of  the  Michigan  Agricultural  College,6  appar- 
ently direct  from  Doctor  Stayman.  under  the  same  designation.  In 
1S90'  Mr.  Benjamin  Buckman,  of  Farmingdale,  111.,  received  scions 
of  it  from  the  Michigan  Agricultural  College  orchard  labeled  "Stay- 
man's  Xo.  1,"  and  in  1S93  under  the  designation  "Stayman's  Supe- 
rior"' he  received  scions  direct  from  Doctor  Stayman.  Having 
fruited  both  and  finding  them  identical,  in  1901  he  sent  specimens 
of  the  fruit  to  Doctor  Stayman  for  authentication  of  name,  and 
received  from  him  a  strong  expression  of  Ins  conviction^  that  the 
apple  sent  was  in  fact  Ins  •Stayman's  Xo.  2."  The  original  tree  is 
reported  by  Mr.  George  H.  Black,  its  present  owner,"  to  be  living  still, 
though  it  was  almost  destroyed  by  a  severe  windstorm  in  September, 
Messrs  Stayman  and  Black  propagated  a  considerable  num- 
ber of  trees  of  it  for  their  own  planting  in  the  winter  of  1897-98  at 
Leavenworth.  Kans.,  where  some  seventy  trees  about  6  years  old  are 
now  in  bearing. 

The  earliest  publication  of  the  variety  appears  to  have  been  by 
Prof.  L.  H.  Bailey  in  >^7.;  when,  as  "Stayman's  Xo.  I,"  it  was 
included  with  several  others  of  Doctor  Stayman's  seedlings  in  a  list 
varieties  growing  at  the  Michigan  Agricultural  College.  In  1S96 
Mr.  Benjamin  Buckman  published  the  names  •Stayman's  Superior'' 
and  ••  Xo.  1  Stayman's"  in  his  "  List  of  Fruit  Varieties."?  their  identity 
not  having  been  discovered  at  that  time.  The  first  commercial 
introduction  of  the  variety  appears  to  have  been  by  Mr.  J.  W.  Kerr, 
who  catalogued  it  for  the  fall  of  189S  and  spring  of  1S99  as  •Stay- 
man  Xo.  1." 

It  is  evident  from  Doctor  Stayman's  notes  and  correspondence 
that  at  different  times  he  had  different  names  for  the  variety  under 
consideration,  such  .   Sap,      "Stayman's  Superior."   ••Mag- 

net." and  "Magnate."  and  it  appears  strongly  probable  that  scions 
were  distributed  by  him  for  testing  imder  all  these  names,  as  well  as 
imder  the  designations  "Xo.  1"  and  "Xo.  _'."  His  final  choice 
appears  to  have  been  "Magnet."'  but  conflict  of  this  with  a  previ- 
.v   published    variety     of    Wise  igin   causes    the   present 

a  Letter  from  J.  Silvanus  Gordon.  December.  1906. 

b  Letters  from  Prof.  L.  R.  Taft  and  Prof.  L.  H.  Pk:  mber,  1900.  and  January. 

1907. 

c  Letters  from  Benjamin  Buckman.  December.  1906. 

<*  Letter  of  Dr.  J.  Stayman  to  Benjamin  Buckman.  O  IflOL 

Letter  of  George  H.  Black.  January- 12.  1907. 

/Michigan  Agricultural  College  Bulletin  31      S8!         T>4. 

0List  of  Fruit  Varieties  in  Private  Experimental  Orchard  of  Benj.  Buckman, 
Farmingdale.  111.,  fall  1S96.  pp.  4-5. 

rf  Dr.  J.  Stayman  to  Benj.  Buckman.  December  17.  1900. 

» Minnesota  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  Report,  18 


Yearbook  U.  S.   Dept.  of  Agriculture,    1906. 


Plate  XXV. 


9.4*fc 


<*4W"?-»-I~0-?-C- 


Magnate  Apple. 


PROMISING    NEW    FRUITS.  357 

adoption  of  his  previously  unpublished  name  ''Magnate,"  under 
which  it  was  planted  in  nursery  and  orchard  by  Messrs.  Stayman 
and  Black.  The  Magnet  apple  listed  hi  Bulletin  56  a  of  the  Bureau 
of  Plant  Industry  is  the  Wisconsin  variety,  and  the  publication  of 
"Stayman  Superior''  as  synonymous  with  it  in  the  revised  edition 
of  that  bulletin6  appears  to  have  been  due  to  a  misapprehension  as 
to  its  identity. 

DESCRIPTION. 

Form  round  to  roundish  conical;  size  medium  to  large;  surface 
smooth,  but  gently  undulating  and  glossy;  color  rich  yellow,  washed 
with  crimson  over  almost  the  entire  surface  and  indistinctly  striped 
with  dark  purple  and  covered  with  whitish  bloom;  dots  variable  in 
size,  numerous,  yellow  or  red;  cavity  regular,  large,  deep  furrowed 
and  but  faintly  russeted;  stem  slender,  curved,  short,  rarely  extend- 
ing beyond  the  cavity;  basin  regular,  of  medium  size  and  depth,  and 
gradual  slope,  furrowed,  and  showing  traces  of  bloom;  eye  medium, 
closed;  calyx  segments  of  medium  size,  converging,  tube  rather  long 
and  narrow;  skin  moderately  thick,  tenacious;  flesh  yellowish,  stained 
with  red,  fine-grained,  half  tender,  juicy;  core  small,  conical,  closed, 
clasping;  seeds  of  medium  size,  plump,  brown,  numerous;  flavor  rich 
subacid;  quality  very  good.  Season,  September  to  December  in 
eastern  Kansas,  about  the  same  as  Jonathan. 

The  tree  is  reported  to  be  an  upright  open  grower,  loaded  with 
wiry  shoots,  and  requiring  little  pruning.  The  variety  appears  to  be 
especially  promising  for  the  middle  and  northern  portions  of  the 
region  where  its  parent,  the  Winesap,  succeeds. 

The  specimen  illustrated  on  Plate  XXV  was  grown  near  Leaven- 
worth, Kans.,  in  1906. 

OLIVER    RED    APPLE. 
(Synoxyms:  Ail-Over  Red;  Oliver;  Oliver's  Red;  Senator.) 

[PLATE  XXVI.] 

One  of  the  striking  features  of  the  Arkansas  fruit  exhibit  at  the 
World's  Columbian  Exposition  in  Chicago  in'  1893  and  the  Cotton 
States  Exposition  at  Atlanta  in  1895  was  a  brilliantly  colored  red 
apple  conspicuously  marked  with  large  light  dots.  It  had  then  been 
grown  for  many  years  in  certain  localities  in  Washington  County, 
Ark.,  both  hi  orchards  and  nurseries,  under  the  name  Oliver's  Red, 
and  according  to  some  accounts  as  ATI-Over  Red.  It  does  not  appear 
to  have  been  known  outside  of  the  Ozark  region  until  after  it  was 
exhibited  with  other  Arkansas  apples  at  Chicago. 

"B.  P.  I.  Bulletin  50,  Nomenclature  of  the  Apple.  January  25,  1905,  p.  189. 
&B.  P.  I.  Bulletin  56,  Nomenclature  of  the  Apple,  revised  July,  1905,  p.  393. 


358  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

nearly  as  can  be  ascertained,  this  variety  originated  early  in 
the  nineteenth  century  °  on  the  John  Oliver  farm,  7  miles  south  of 
Lincoln,  in  Washington  County,  Ark.  It  was  first  propagated  by 
Earles  Holt  about  the  middle  of  the  century,  who  grafted  it  on  a 
place  2  miles  north  of  Lincoln,  where  it  has  been  locally  known 
and  propagated  ever  since  that  time  under  the  name  Oliver's  Red. 
At  various  times  one  or  two  other  seedlings  appear  to  have  been 
somewhat  confused  with  it,  but  at  the  present  time  no  other  sort  is 
recognized  in  the  locality  under  that  name.  In  1898  Prof.  John  T. 
Stinson*  described  it  under  the  shortened  name  Oliver,  but  this  had 
previously  been  published0  for  a  very  different  sort. 

the  variety  has  been  quite  widely  disseminated  by  the 
k  Brothers  Nurseries  and  Orchards  Company  under  the  name 
which  was  registered  by  them  in  the  LTnited  States  Patent 
Office  on  November  22,  1898,  as  a  trade-mark.     In  view  of  the  fact 
that  the  earlier  name  had  been  well  established  for  half  a  century  in 
the  region  where  it  originated  and  continues  to  be  practically  the 
onlv  name  known  for  it  there,  that  name.  Oliver  Red,  is  here  accepted 
e  one  to  winch  the  variety  is  entitled  under  the  code  of  nomen- 
clature of  the  American  Pomological  Society. 

DESCRIPTION". 

nn   oblate  to  roundish  oblate;   >ize  medium  to   large;  surface 
smooth  and  glossy,  excepting  occasional  russet  knobs  and  numerous 
color  deep  yellow,  washed  over  most  of  the  surface  with 
bright  mixed  red  and  brokenly  striped  with  dark  crimson;  dots  very 
oicuous,   russeted,   mostly   aureole:  cavity   large,   regular,   deep 
m  short,  rather  stout:  basin  large,  deep,  regular,  grad- 
ual, furrowed;  eye  large,  closed;  calyx  segments  of  medium 
size,  converging,  tube  very  short  and  broad;  skin  moderately  thick, 
tenacious :  flesh  yellowish,  frequently  stained,  moderately  fine  grained, 
breaking,  juicy:  core  medium,  conical,  open,  meeting  the  eye;  seeds 
lium  in  size,  plump,  brown:  flavor  subacid,  pleasant;  quality  good 
ry  good. 
The  tree  is  a  strong,  upright  grower,  somewhat  subject  to  sun  scald 
unless  headed  low.  but  coming  into  bearing  at  an  early  age  and  bearing 
well.     It  is  a  choice  dessert  apple,  well  adapted  to  fancy  trade,  and 
thy  of  testing  throughout  the  important  apple  districts  of  the 
country. 

The  specimen  illustrated  on  Plate  XXVI  was  grown  in  1906  by 
G.  TV.  Collins.  Lincoln,  Washington  County,  Ark. 

o  Letters  of  Win.  G.  Yincenheller.  December,  190i,  and  It  D.  Holt  and  Gr.  W 

Lincoln,  Ark.,  January.  1907. 
i>  Arkansas  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  Bulletin  49.  January.  1898,  p.  16. 
£  Magazine  <*i  Horticulture.  i853,  p.  165. 


Yearbook  U.  S.   Dept.  of  Agriculture,    1906. 


Plate  XXVI. 


9.49* 


cx4M  2->T-<>7-C^ 


Oliver  Red  Apple. 


Yearbook  U.   S.   Dept    o*  Ag 


Plate  XXVII. 


■4^/\Q<rt^ 


Rabun  Apple. 


PROMISING    XEW    FKUITS.  359 

RABUN    APPLE. 

(Synonyms:  Rabun  Bald;  Rabun  BaU.a  through  typographical  error.) 
[PLATE  XXYIl.] 

One  of  the  most  promising  new  apples  for  the  lower  Appalachian 
region,  comprising  western  North  Carolina,  eastern  Tennessee,  and 
northern  Georgia,  is  the  Rabun.  Its  history  as  furnished  by  Prof. 
C.  C.  Newman,6  of  Clemson  College,  S.  C.,is  substantially  as  follows: 

The  original  tree  was  found  about  1S90  by  Mr.  Andy  Hanby  in  clear- 
ing land  on  his  place  on  the  TValhalla  and  Franklin  wagon  road,  about 
13  miles  northeast  of  Clayton,  Ga.,  where  it  still  stands.  It  was 
small  when  found,  and  is  thought  by  Mr.  Hanby  to  have  been  about 
5  years  old  at  that  time.  About  1900  Mr.  Hanby  dug  up  eight  young 
sprouts  about  the  parent  tree  and  planted  them  elsewhere,  all  of  which 
are  now  in  bearing  and  are  identical  with  the  parent  tree.  Fruit  from 
the  original  tree  was  exhibited  at  the  Georgia  State  Fair  in  1904  and 
1905  under  the  name  "Rabun  Bald,"'  which  was  suggested  by  the 
location  of  the  tree,  which  is  on  a  spur  of  Bald  Mountain.  It  has 
since  been  locally  known  under  this  name,  which  is  here  reduced  to 
Rabun  to  conform  to  the  code  of  nomenclature  of  the  American  Pomo- 
logical  Society.  It  was  first  described  and  illustrated  by  Prof.  C.  C. 
Newman  c  in  1905  in  Bulletin  9  of  the  South  Carolina  Agricultural 
Experiment  Station.  Some  2,500  trees  of  this  variety  have  been 
planted  at  Clayton,  Ga.,  but  aside  from  tins  it  does  not  appear  to  have 
been  commercially  disseminated. 

DESCRIPTION. 

Form  oblate,  slightly  ribbed;  size  large;  surf  ace  smooth ;  color  yel- 
low, washed  with  mixed  red,  splashed  and  striped  with  bright  crimson; 
dots  numerous,  small,  russet;  cavity  large,  regular,  deep,  russeted; 
stem  short,  stout;  basin  regular,  large,  deep,  of  gradual  slope,  fur- 
rowed; e}*e  medium  to  large,  closed;  calyx  segments  medium,  con- 
verging, refiexed  at  tip,  tube  long,  flaring;  skin  moderately  thick, 
tenacious;  flesh  yellowish,  tine-grained,  breaking,  juicy;  core  large, 
oblate,  open,  clasping;  seeds  medium,  plump,  brown,  very  numerous; 
flavor  subacid;  quality  good  to  very  good.  Season,  November  to 
March  in  northern  Georgia. 

The  tree  is  described  as  a  stocky,  vigorous  grower,  of  spreading 
habit,  requiring  severe  pruning  when  young.  The  bearing  habit  is 
distinctive  in  that  the  fruit  is  largely  borne  on  spurs  along  the  older 
branches,  the  crop  being  thus  quite  evenly  distributed  throughout  the 

°  South  Carolina  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  Bulletin  9.  May,  1905.  p.  24. 

&  Letters  of  C.  0.  Newman.  January,  1907. 

c  South  Carolina  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  Bulletin  9,  p.  2-i. 


360  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

tree.     The  original  tree  is  a  heavy  cropper  in  alternate  years,  bearing 
about  a  half  crop  in  the  "  off  year.*'     It  yielded  15  bushels  in  1905. 

The  specimen  illustrated  on  Plate  XXVII  was  grown  in  1905  by 
Prof.  C.  0.  Newman,  at  Clayton.  Rabun  County.  Ga. 

EARLY    WHEELER    PEACH. 

Synonyms:  Wheeler  Cling:  Early  Wheeler  Clint 

IPLiTE  XXVIII.] 

The  lengthening  of  the  peach  season  through  the  origination  of  both 
earlier  and  later  varieties  of  good  quality  is  a  matter  of  much  impor- 
tance to  peach  growers,  especially  in  the  Southern  States.  At  the 
present  time  so  large  a  proportion  of  the  trees  in  southern  orchards 
consists  of  the  one  variety,  Elberta,  that  almost  the  entire  peach  crop 
of  each  important  locality  must  be  harvested  and  marketed  witliin  a 
period  of  ten  days  or  two  weeks.  This  causes  serious  labor  shortage 
at  the  critical  times,  overburdens  transportation  facilities,  and  tends 
to  produce  that  most  expensive  menace  to  profitable  peach  growing, 
a  glutted  market.  If  the  weather  conditions  chance  to  be  unfavorable 
during  this  short  harvest  period,  the  evils  are  accentuated  and  most 
of  the  returns  for  the  year's  work  are  not  infrequently  lost  through 
the  shortness  of  the  marketing  season.  Peach  growers  and  nursery- 
men have  long  recognized  the  need  of  earlier  market  varieties,  and  a 
large  number  of  early  sorts  have  been  brought  into  notice  from  time 
to  time.  Among  these  the  Greensboro,  Carman,  Waddell,  Mamie 
Ross,  and  Hiley  varieties  have  attained  a  more  or  less  stable  foothold 
in  different  sections  as  commercial  sorts. 

Most  of  the  varieties  earlier  than  these,  however,  unless  grown  under 
very  favorable  conditions,  are  of  inferior  flavor  and  deficient  carrying 
quality.  The  Early  "Wheeler,  which  was  one  of  a  large  number  of 
seedlings  of  Heath  Cling  grown  by  Mr.  E.  W.  Kirkpatrick,  of  McKin- 
ney.  Tex.,  and  first  fruited  in  1900,  appears  to  be  an  exception  in  these 
respects,  being  as  early  as  Alexander,  as  large  as  Mamie  Ross,  and  of 
as  excellent  dessert  and  shipping  quality  as  Oldmixon  Cling.  It  was 
experimentally  disseminated  by  Mr.  Kirkpatrick  immediately  after  it 
first  fruited,  being  sent  out  as  Early  Wheeler  Cling.  About  1903  tins 
was  reduced  to  Early  Wheeler,  and  on  April  17,  1906,  an  arbitrary 
device  bearing  tins  name  and  a  portrait  of  the  originator  was  regis- 
tered in  the  United  States  Patent  Office  as  a  trade-mark  by  the  Texas 
Nursery  Company,  of  Sherman.  Tex.,  which  introduced  it  commer- 
cially in  that  year. 

DESCRIPTION. 

Form  roundish  oblong  to  oblong  conical:  size  medium  to  larg 
cavity  regular,  large,  broad,  of  medium  depth  and  slope,  marked  with 
red;  stem    short,    moderately    stout;  suture    shallow    except    near 


Yearbook  U.   S.   Oept.  of  Agriculture,    1906. 


Plate  XXVIII. 


S.^c 


chW-Z-j-z-o-t-O- 


Early  Wheeler  Peach. 


Yearbook   U.    S.    Oept.   of  Agriculture,    '906. 


Plate  XXIX. 


£f  v/o<M?»r-orC 


Banner  Grape 


PROMISING    NEW    FRUITS.  3(31 

cavity,  from  which  it  extends  to  the  protruding  apex;  surface  smooth, 
covered  with  loose,  soft,  velvety  down;  color  creamy  white,  marbled, 
splashed  and  dotted  with  crimson;  skin  moderately  thick,  tenacious; 
flesh  whitish,  distinctly  stained  with  red  near  the  skin,  firm  and  meaty, 
but  juicy;  stone  oval,  of  medium  size,  adherent;  flavor  subacid; 
quality  good  to  very  good.  Season,  very  early,  May  15  to  June  1, 
practically  with  Alexander  in  northeastern  Texas.  Leaf  glands  reni- 
form;  blossoms  very  large  and  red. 

The  variety  has  already  been  considerably  planted  in  commercial 
orchards  in  eastern  Texas,  and  while  less  precocious  than  some  sorts, 
is  considered  sufficiently  productive  for  a  commercial  variety. 

The  specimen  illustrated  on  Plate  XXVIII  was  grown  by  E.  W. 
Kirkpatrick,  at  McKinney,  Tex. 

BANNER    GRAPE. 

[PLATE  XXIX.] 

This  very  promising  variety  for  the  Southwest  is  said  by  its 
originator,  Mr.  Joseph  Bachman,  Altus,  Ark.,a  to  have  been  grown 
in  1898  from  seed  of  Lindley  crossed  with  Delaware.  It  would 
appear  from  the  vigor  and  productiveness  of  the  vine  and  the  large 
size  of  the  cluster,  however,  that  some  other  variety,  probably  one 
of  his  other  seedlings  that  stood  near  by,  was  concerned  in  the  cross, 
and  the  originator  appears  to  incline  to  this  opinion,  as  he  states 
that  the  Lindley  blossoms  were  not  protected  from  other  pollen  at 
the  time  of  pollination  with  Delaware. 

The  original  vine  bore  a  crop  of  twelve  clusters  in  its  third  year, 
1901.  Two  of  these  were  exhibited  by  the  originator  at  the  Pan- 
American  Exposition  in  that  }^ear  under  the  name  Banner,  which 
the  late  Judge  Samuel  Miller  published  for  the  variety  in  a  commu- 
nication in  Colman's  Rural  World  for  September  18,  1901.  The 
variety  was  first  propagated  in  1902,  and  was  experimentally  dis- 
seminated in  the  spring  of  1906.  So  far  as  known,  it  has  not  yet 
been  fruited  elsewhere  than  on  the  grounds  of  the  originator.  It  was 
commercially  introduced  in  1906  by  the  Stark  Brothers  Nurseries 
and  Orchards  Company  under  the  name  Banner,  which  when  printed 
in  a  certain  arbitrary  typographical  form  was  registered  by  them  as 
a  trade-mark  in  the  United  States  Patent  Office,  May  1,  1906. 

DESCRIPTION. 

Cluster  large,  broad  conical,  heavily  shouldered,  very  compact; 
stem  short;  berries  globular,  of  medium  size,  adhering  tenaciously 
to  the  small  green  peduncles;  skin  moderately  thick,  and  rather 
tough;  amber  red  and  glossy,  but  covered  with  a  profuse  bloom;  flesh 

«  Letters  of  Joseph  Bachman,  August  and  September,  1906,  and  January,  1907. 


362  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

translucent,  juicy,  and  rather  meaty:  seeds  few.  very  small,  brown; 
flavor  refreshing  subacid  to  sweet  and  aromatic;  quality  good  to 
ven*  good.  Season,  late  August  and  early  September  in  Franklin 
County,  Ark.,  ten  days  or  two  weeks  later  than  Delaware. 

The  vine  is  reported  by  the  originator  to  be  very  vigorous  and 
productive. 

The  cluster  illustrated  on  Plate  XXIX  was  grown  by  Mr.  Joseph 
Bachman.  at  Altus,  Franklin  County.  Ark. 

J<  iSEPHINE    PERSIMMON. 

■ 

[PLATE  XXX] 

Of  the  varieties  of  this  valuable  native  fruit  that  have  thus  far 
been  brought  to  the  attention  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture,  the 
-  rt  quality  is  the  one  here  described.  It  was  received 
first  from  T.  V.  Munson  &  Son.  of  Denison,  Tex.,  who  have  catalogued0 
it  since  "American   Horny."  their  dissemination   consisting 

chiefly  of  seedlings  grown  from  a  top-grafted  tree  standing  upon  their 
grounds.  Attention  to  the  apparent  identity  of  American  Honey 
and  Josephine,  a  variety  gratuitously  disseminated  by  the  late  Judge 
Samuel  Miller,  of  BlufTton.  Mo.,  having  been  called  by  Mr.  Benjamin 
Buckman,6  of  Farmingdale.  111.,  recent  investigation  has  revealed 
the  following  interesting  fact-: 

About  1SS2  or  lSc-3  the  late  Judge  Miller  discovered  a  wild  per- 
simmon tree  bearing  fruit  of  superior  quality  on  the  farm  of  Mr. 
Dennis  Watson,  about  a  mile  east  of  BlufTton,  Mo.c  The  tree  was 
then  about  3  inches  in  diameter,  and  stood  close  to  the  bank  of  the 
Missouri  River,  where  it  was  in  danger  of  being  undermined  by  that 
unruly  stream.  Though  a  large  tree  of  this  species  to  transplant, 
in  1SS3  Judge  Miller,  with  the  help  of  his  sons,  dug  it  up  and  trans- 
ported it  in  a  small  boat  to  his  home  garden  at  BlufTton.  The  trans- 
planted tree  never  thrived  in  its  new  location,  but  the  variety  was 
preserved  by  grafting,  and  was  gratuitously  disseminated  by  him 
am"  iends  and  correspondents  in  many  parts  of  the  country. 

Later  he  named  it  Josephine,  in  honor  of  a  daughter  of  Mr.  Watson, 
on  whose  farm  the  original  tree  was  found.  Tins  name  Mr.  Miller 
published  in  1894.-  Meanwhile,  Prof.  T.  Y.  Munson  had  received  from 
Judge  Miller,  about  1SS3  or  1884/  three  lots  of  native  persimmon 
scions     designated  as  follows:  ""Flat  fruited,"  "'round  fruited,"    and 

a  Letter  of  T.  V.  Munson.  November.  1906. 

k  Benjamin  Buckman  in  Rural  New  Yorker.  February  20,  1904,  p.  130. 

c  Letter  of  Samuel  E.  Miller,  December.  1906. 

d  Colman's  Rural  World.  February  15.  1894.  p.  51. 

1  Letters  of  T.  V.  Munson.  November,  1906. 


PROMISING    NEW    FRUITS.  363 

"oblong  fruited."  These  he  grafted  on  native  roots,  getting  one 
tree  of  each  to  grow.  Of  these,  the  ones  labeled  "flat  fruited"  and 
"round  fruited"  bore  fruit,  the  one  labeled  "oblong  fruited"  proving 
to  be  staminate  flowered,  and  therefore  sterile.  The  flat  one  was  found 
to  be  of  better  quality  than  the  other,  and  after  fruiting  both  for 
several  years,  Professor  Munson,  unaware  that  Judge  Miller  had  mean- 
while disseminated  and  named  it  Josephine,  christened  it  "American 
Honey"  and  offered  it  in  his  catalogue  for  1896,  as  previously 
mentioned. 

The  name  Josephine  having  previously  been  applied  and  published 
by  the  introducer  and  used  on  scions  for  grafting  entitles  it  to  accept- 
ance by  pomologists,  and  it  is  so  accepted  by  Professor  Munson  since 
the  facts  have  become  known. 

The  case  well  illustrates  how  easily  varietal  names  of  fruits  may 
become  confused  during  their  preliminary  testing  periods.  Nothing 
less  than  the  utmost  exactness  and  care  by  disseminators  and  propa- 
gators will  suffice  to  prevent  confusion  and  duplication  of  names  in 
such  eases. 

DESCRIPTION. 

Form  oblate  to  roundish  oblate,  or  quadrangular;  size  medium  to 
large;  surface  smooth,  except  shallow  radiating  grooves  near  the 
calyx  and  the  four  sutures;  color  pale,  translucent,  yellowish,  covered 
with  a  profuse  whitish  bloom;  cavity  large,  broad,  of  medium  depth, 
furrowed;  stem  short,  moderately  stout;  calyx  four  parted,  of  me- 
dium size,  pale  green;  apex  a  slender  point  in  a  slight  depression; 
skin  thin,  tender;  flesh  yellowish,  translucent,  with  yellow  veins; 
seeds  rather  numerous,  rather  large,  short,  broad,  plump,  brown; 
flavor  sweet,  rich,  and  aromatic;  quality  very  good.  Season,  early, 
following  Early  Golden. 

The  tree  is  reported  to  bear  regular  crops,  and  the  earliness  and  fine 
quality  of  the  fruit  render  the  variety  worthy  of  test  by  all  persimmon 
growers. 

The  specimens  illustrated  on  Plate  XXX  were  grown  by  T.  V. 
Munson  &  Son,  at  Denison,  Tex.,  in  1906. 

CHAPPELOW    AVOCADO. 

[PLATE  XXXI.] 

Interest  in  the  avocado  as  a  salad  fruit  continues  to  increase.  The 
market  demand  is  so  strong  in  eastern  cities  during  late  autumn  and 
winter  that  south  Florida  growers  are  enlarging  their  plantings  of  the 
later  ripening  sorts  of  the  West  Indian  type,  such  as  the  Trapp,°  in 
the  expectation  that  their  culture  will  prove  highly  profitable.  In 
southern  California  quite  a  different  condition  prevails,  the  smaller 
and  more  hardy  Mexican  type  being  apparently  better  adapted  to 

a  Described  and  illustrated  in  Yearbook  for  1905,  p.  508,  Plate  LXYI. 


364  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

conditions  in  the  localities  where  avocado  culture  has  thus  far  been 
attempted.  While  no  commercial  plantings  as  large  as  those  in  south 
Florida  have  yet  been  made  in  California,  certain  individual  trees  in 
particular  localities  have  proved  productive  and  profitable,  and,  as 
the  local  demand  at  all  times  of  the  year  is  thus  far  in  excess  of  the 
supply,  regularity  of  bearing  and  acceptable  quality  of  fruit  in  that 
State  outweigh  all  other  varietal  characteristics. 

So  far  as  known  the  only  variety  thus  far  perpetuated  by  bud 
propagation  in  California  is  the  Chappelow.  The  original  tree  of  this 
variety  was  grown  by  Mr.  William  Chappelow,  Monrovia,  Cal.,  from 
seeds  sent  him  by  the  Division  of  Pomology  of  the  Department  of 
Agriculture  in  July,  1893.  The  seeds  had  been  received  shortly  before 
that  time  from  Mr.  F.  Foex,  then  of  Eddy,  N.  Mex.,  who  had  obtained 
them  from  fruits  found  by  him  on  trees  near  Monterey,  Mexico,  where 
they  had  been  subjected  to  a  temperature  of  about  22°  F.  during 
several  consecutive  nights  when  in  blossom  during  the  preceding 
winter.  As  the  other  avocado  trees  of  the  vicinity  had  been  killed  or 
badly  damaged  b}^  the  low  temperature,  while  these  had  survived  and 
matured  half  a  crop  of  fruit,  it  was  presumed  that  these  were  especially 
resistant  to  cold,  as  has  since  been  proved  true  in  the  case  of  seedlings 
descended  from  them. 

Mr.  Chappelow  grew  but  a  single  tree  from  the  four  seeds  sent  him. 
This  was  grown  in  a  pot  at  first,  being  transplanted  to  the  open  ground 
when  about  a  foot  high.  The  first  winter,  when  about  4  feet  high,  it 
was  cut  down  to  the  ground  by  a  temperature  of  about  24°  F.,  but  soon 
recovered  and  developed  into  a  fine,  vigorous  tree.  It  began  bearing 
in  1898,  and  has  rarely  failed  to  produce  at  least  a  partial  crop  since 
that  time.  Scions  from  this  tree  were  sent  Prof.  P.  PI.  Rolfs,  of  the 
Subtropical  Laboratory,  at  Miami,  Fla.,  in  1902,  and  fruits  grown 
on  a  tree  top-worked  therefrom  were  illustrated  by  him  in  1904.° 
The  variety  was  named  Chappelow  by  Professor  Rolfs b  and  has  since 
been  sparingly  disseminated  under  that  name.  Mr.  Chappelow  has 
not  kept  a  continuous  record  of  the  product  of  the  tree,  but  states 
that  in  1905  it  bore  more  than  1,200  fruits.  The  net  return  to 
him  from  this  tree  in  recent  years,  in  addition  to  fruits  retained  for 
home  use,  has  been  as  follows: c  1903,  $32;  1904,  $54;  1905,  $130; 
1906,  $65.  The  tree  blossoms  at  Monrovia  in  November  and  Decem- 
ber, and  ripens  its  crop  from  July  15  until  September,  sometimes 
continuing  into  early  October. 

DESCRIPTION. 

Form  oblong,  slender,  pyriform  or  ''bottle  necked;"  size  medium 
to  large  for  the  Mexican  type;  cavity  small,  shallow,  and  wrinkled; 

a  B.  P.  I.  Bulletin  61.     The  Avocado  in  Florida,  July  7,  1904,  fig.  9  B,  p   26. 

b  B.  P.  I.  Bulletin  97.     S.  P.  I.  Inventory  No.  12934. 

c  Letters  from  William  Chappelow,  August  and  October,  1906. 


Yearbook  U.   S     Dept.  of  Agriculture,    1906. 


Plate  XXX. 


5 


-«^«^^ 


Josephine  Persimmon. 


YearDOOK   u     S.    Dept.   o*  Agr  Cji-^re       906 


=  ^-~E    XXX: 


9  %%<*>. 


Chappelow  Avocado. 


PROMISING    NEW    FRUITS.  365 

stem  stout;  surface  undulating,  smooth,  glossy;  color  dull  purple, 
with  reddish-brown  dots;  apex  a  mere  dot;  skin  vers'  thin,  tender, 
adhering  closely;  flesh  pale  greenish-yellow,  buttery;  seed  large  in 
proportion  to  size  of  fruit,  roundish  conical,  filling  internal  cavity: 
flavor  pleasant,  though  less  rich  than  the  best  varieties  of  the  West 
Indian  type.     Season,  July  to  October  at  Monrovia,  Cal. 

The  tree  is  a  vigorous,  rather  diffuse  grower,  with  slender  wood.  It 
is  productive,  although  being  an  early  bloomer  it  is  sometimes  caught 
by  frost.  It  is  considered  worthy  of  testing  in  the  thermal  belts  of 
southern  California,  and  for  domestic  use  along  the  northern  edge  of 
the  avocado  districts  of  Florida,  where  its  superior  hardiness  is  likely 
to  outweigh  the  disadvantages  of  relatively  small  size  and  early  time 
of  ripening. 

The  specimen  illustrated  on  Plate  XXXI  was  grown  on  the  original 
tree  on  the  grounds  of  Mr.  William  Chappelow,  Monrovia,  Cal. 

PECANS. 
[PLATE  XXXII.] 

The  pecan  continues  to  engage  the  attention  of  nut  growers  in  the 
South  Atlantic  and  Gulf  States  almost  to  the  exclusion  of  other  nut- 
bearing  trees.  The  increasing  popularity  of  the  nut,  doubtless  due 
in  part  to  the  development  of  systematic  methods  of  grading  and 
cracking  by  machinery  operated  by  steam  or  electric  power,  which 
render  possible  the  marketing  of  the  meats  ready  for  use,  have  com- 
bined to  produce  a  market  demand  considerably  in  excess  of  the 
present  supply.  Under  this  stimulus  and  the  production  of  consid- 
erable numbers  of  budded  and  grafted  trees  of  choice  varieties  in 
southern  nurseries  the  planting  of  pecan  orchards  is  proceeding  rap- 
idly in  many  portions  of  the  South.  Much  of  this  planting  up  to  the 
present  time  has  of  necessity  been  done  rather  blindly  as  regards  the 
adaptability  of  varieties  to  soil  and  climatic  conditions,  very  few 
varieties  having  yet  been  fruited  sufficiently  outside  of  the  localities 
of  their  origin  to  determine  their  probable  behavior  elsewhere.  As 
the  earlier  plantings  of  budded  and  grafted  trees  come  into  bearing, 
it  is  unfortunately  becoming  apparent  that  in  the  infancy  of  the 
industry  the  stock  of  several  of  the  leading  varieties  was  consider- 
ably mixed  with  other  sorts.  In  some  cases  closely  related  seedlings 
inferior  to  the  sort  whose  name  they  bore  appear  to  have  been  propa- 
gated from.  This  confusion  of  identity  is  now  giving  rise  to  diverse 
reports  as  to  the  behavior  of  particular  varieties  in  different  sections, 
and  will  doubtless  require  some  years  of  careful  work  by  nurserymen 
and  orchardists  to  rectify. 

Seedling  orchards  grown  from  nuts  of  the  large  varieties,  such  as 
Centennial,  Frotscher,  Stuart,  Van  Deman,  Russell,  etc.,  that  came 
into  public  notice  from  1875  to  1895,  are  now  coming  into  bearing 


366  YEAKBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

throughout  the  South,  and  as  both  the  trees  and  nuts  commonly  bear 
a  general  resemblance  to  their  parents,  they  are  in  many  instances 
being  discussed  and  even  labeled  with  the  names  of  the  parent  varie- 
ties. As  such  seedlings  are  likely  to  disclose  characteristics  even 
more  diverse  from  their  parents  if  budded  or  grafted  from  and  planted 
elsewhere,  they  should  never  be  designated  otherwise  than  as  seed- 
lings until  found  worthy  of  distinctive  varietal  names. 

The  utmost  care  in  selection  of  authentic  stock  of  these  earlier 
varieties  to  bud  and  graft  from  is  necessary  at  the  present  time  to 
insure  trueness  to  name  in  the  nurseries  and  orchards.  It  is  not  safe 
to  use  grafting  or  budding  wood  of  any  of  these  sorts  from  trees  that 
have  not  borne,  except  where  such  stock  can  be  unquestionably  traced 
to  bearing  trees  that  are  true  to  name. 

Less  confusion  exists  among  the  more  recent  introductions,  although 
some  of  these  have  in  various  ways  been  more  or  less  confused  with 
one  another.  A  few  of  the  more  promising  of  the  newer  ones  are 
described  and  illustrated. 

Alley  Pecan. 

The  original  tree  of  this  variety  was  grown  by  Mrs.  C.  H.  Alley," 
of  Scranton,  Miss.,  from  a  pecan  of  unknown  variety  presented  to 
her  by  the  late  Col.  R.  Seal,  of  Mississippi  City,  Miss.,  in  1871.  This 
nut  she  planted  in  a  box  the  same  fall,  transplanting  the  young 
seedling  that  resulted  therefrom  to  its  present  location  in  her  garden 
in  1872.  The  tree  began  bearing  at  the  age  of  about  nine  years  and 
has  the  reputation  of  being  a  steady  and  prolific  bearer.  The  variety 
was  first  propagated  by  Mr.  F.  H.  Lewis,  of  Scranton,  who  set  buds 
and  grafts  of  it  in  1S96,  and  since  that  time  it  has  been  considerably 
disseminated  by  him  and  others  under  the  name  Alley.  The  original 
tree  bore  about  200  pounds  of  nuts  in  1905,  and  had  a  fair  crop  when 
the  storm  of  September,  1906,  occurred.  This  destroyed  a  consid- 
erable portion  of  the  crop  and  broke  several  large  branches  from  the 
tree,  though  not  enough  to  permanently  injure  it. 

DESCRIPTION. 

Size  medium,  averaging  60  to  SO  nuts  per  pound;  form,  oblong  to 
ovate  conical,  with  moderately  sharp  quadrangular  apex;  color, 
bright  yellowish  brown,  with  rather  long  and  conspicuous  black  mark- 
ings; shell  brittle,  thin;  partitions  very  thin;  cracking  quality  excel- 
lent; kernel  plump  and  well  filled  out,  though  deeply  grooved  and 
considerably  undulated  and  irregularly  indented;  kernel  bright, 
brownish  straw  color;  texture  firm  and  fine  grained;  flavor  sweet, 
delicate,  and  free  from  astringence;  quality  very  good. 

The  specimens  illustrated  on  Plate  XXXII  were  grown  on  the 
original  tree  in  the  garden  of  Mrs.  C.  H.  Allej^,  at  Scranton,  Miss. 

a  Letter  from  Mrs.  C.  H.  Alley,  November,  1906. 


PROMISING    NEW    FEUITS.  367 

The  tree  is  a  moderately  strong,  though  rather  slender,  grower  and 
is  reported  to  be  productive  in  several  localities  where  it  has  been 
top-worked  during  the  past  five  or  six  years. 

Teche'-?  Pecan-. 

(Synonyms:    '' Frotschcr  Xo.  g;"    " Duplicate  Frotscher;"    ''Fake  Frotschcr;"   "Spuri- 
ous Frotschcr." ) 

Among  the  budded  trees  of  the  Frotscher  pecan  when  first  dissemi- 
nated by  Mr.  William  Xelson  and  the  late  Mr.  Richard  Frotscher, 
of  New  Orleans,  about  18S5,6  it  has  recently  been  discovered  that 
there  were  trees  of  at  least  one  other  variety  quite  closely  resembling 
it  in  wood  and  habit  of  growth,  but  yielding  a  smaller  and  more  con- 
ical nut.  This  sort,  which  reached  a  number  of  growers,  including 
Mr.  J.  B.  Wight, c  of  Cairo,  Ga.,  and  Dr.  J.  B.  Curtis,  of  Orange 
Heights,  Fla.,  in  this  way,  has  proved  to  be  of  sufficient  merit  to 
entitle  it  to  a  distinctive  name.  The  place  of  its  origin  is  not  known, 
but  since  it  appears  to  trace  to  the  first  lot  of  Frotscher  scions  received 
by  Mr.  Xelson  d  from  Mr.  Frotscher  for  propagation,  all  of  which 
were  supposed  to  have  come  from  the  original  Frotscher  tree  near 
Olivier,  La.,  on  the  Bayou  Teche,  it  is  probable  that  the  parent  tree 
of  this  one  was  somewhere  in  that  vicinity.  Acting  on  this  suppo- 
sition, the  committee  on  nomenclature  and  standards  of  the  National 
Nut  Growers'  Association,  at  its  annual  meeting  at  Scranton,  Miss., 
in  November,  1906,  named  the  variety  ''Teche"  to  distinguish  it 
from  the  true  Frotscher.  As  there  appears  to  be  good  reason  to  sup- 
pose that  several  other  varieties  closely  resembling  Frotscher  have 
been  and  still  are  mixed  with  that  variety  in  many  orchards  and 
nurseries,  the  name  Teche  should  not  be  indiscriminately  applied  to 
all  the  "spurious"  Frotschers,  but  should  be  restricted  in  its  appli- 
cation to  the  one  which  is  here  described  from  specimens  grown  by 
Mr.  Wight  on  trees  obtained  from  the  Nelson  nursery  in  1895. 

DESdUPTIOX. 

Size  medium  to  large,  averaging  oo  to  65  nuts  per  pound;  form  long 
oval,  compressed,  tapering  gradually,  with  the  smaller  specimens 
slightly  curved  near  apex:  color  bright,  light,  and  free  from  the  objec- 
tionable brownish  veining  ot  the  Frotscher,  with  few  broken  black 
stripes;  shell  comparatively  thin,  but  thicker  than  Frotscher,  with 
which  it  was  disseminated  tlirough  error;  partitions  thin  and  soft: 
cracking  quality  excellent:  kernel  bright,  plump  and  uniformly  well 

a  Pronounced  Tosh. 

l>  Yearbook.  1904.  p.  408. 

'Letters  from  J.  D.  Wight,  November,  1906;  also  The  Nut  Grower,  June,  1906,  p.  190. 

d  Wm.  Xelson  in  The  Nut  Grower,  August.  1906.  p.  is 


368  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

filled,  with  shallow  grooves;  texture  of  meat  firm,  fine  grained,  solid, 
creamy  in  color;  flavor  delicate,  rich:  quality  very  good. 

The  specimens  illustrated  on  Plate  XXXII  were  grown  by  Mr.  J.  B. 
Wight,  Cairo,  Ga. 

The  tree  is  of   more  slender  and  upright  habit  of  growth  than 

Frotscher,  and  is  reported  to  be  fully  as  productive  as  that  variety 

in  Georgia  and  Florida.     It  is  worthy  of  trial  wherever  that  variety 

succeeds. 

Curtis  Pec  ax. 

(Synonym:  Curtis  No.  J.) 

The  original  tree  of  this  variety  was  grown  by  Dr.  J.  B.  Curtis,  of 
Orange  Heights,  Fla.,  from  a  nut  of  the  "  Turkey  Egg"  pecan  obtained 
from  Arthur  Brown,  of  Bagdad.  Fla.,  in  1SS6.  It  bore  about  a  dozen 
nuts  in  1893,  and  has  borne  a  crop  each  year  since  then,  except  in 
1902,  when  heavy  rains  at  blooming  time  prevented  fertilization  of  the 
blossoms.  It  was  first  propagated  by  Doctor  Curtis  in  1896,  and  was 
disseminated  by  him  somewhat  later.  The  original  tree,  though 
heavily  cut  for  scions,  yielded  SO  pounds  of  nuts  in  1905. a  The  vari- 
ety appears  to  have  been  first  described  and  illustrated  by  Hume6  in 
1900. 

DESCRIPTION. 

>ize  medium,  60  to  70  nuts  per  pound;  form  ovate  conical,  com- 
pressed, with  a  sharp  pointed  base  and  an  inclination  to  curve  near 
apex:  color  bright,  with  very  few  black  stripes,  but  sparsely  stippled 
with  black  over  most  of  the  surface;  shell  very  thin  and  brittle;  par- 
titions thin;  cracking  quality  good ;  kernel  very  plump  and  thick,  free 
from  indentation  other  than  the  narrow  grooves,  which  are  of  medium 
depth;  color  bright,  except  certain  brownish  stippling  that  percepti- 
bly darkens  the  tint  in  some  specimens:  texture  firm,  crisp;  flavor 
sweet  and  rich:  quality  very  good. 

The  specimens  illustrated  on  Plate  XXXII  were  grown  by  Dr.  J.  B. 
Curtis,  at  Orange  Heights.  Fla. 

The  tree  is  reported  to  be  slender  and  rather  pendulous  in  habit 
of  growth  and  regularly  productive.  The  variety  is  of  special  prom- 
ise for  Florida  glowers,  as  it  is  one  of  the  few  sorts  that  have  origi- 
nated and  been  thoroughly  tested  in  that  State.  It  is  reported  to  be 
rather  hard  to  propagate,  the  wood  being  slender  and  the  buds  not 
numerous.  Doctor  Curtis  reports  it  free  from  attack  by  the  bud  worm 
where  such  sorts  as  Rome  and  Centennial  are  badly  damaged  by  it. 

a  Dr.  J.  B.  Curtis  in  the  Nut  Grower.  June.  1906.  pp.  200-201.  and  letter  of  February 
11,  1907. 

*>  Florida  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  Bulletin  54.  August.  1900.  pp.  203-209. 


Yearbook    U.    S     Dept.   of  Agriculture,    ,906. 


Plate  XXXII. 


DELMAS. 


£JSJL 


1**s6r 


Pecan  Varieties. 


PROMISING    NEW    FRUITS.  369 

Georgia  Pecan. 
(Synonym:  Georgia  Giant.) 

The  original  tree  of  this  variety  is  one  of  a  large  number  of  seedlings 
grown  in  nursery  row  by  Mr.  G.  M.  Bacon, a  of  Dewitt,  Ga.,  from  nuts 
of  unknown  parentage  in  1885.  Enough  of  these  seedlings  for  a  30- 
acre  orchard  when  planted  30  feet  apart  were  transplanted  to  their 
present  locations  the  following  year.  In  1891  this  tree,  which  was  the 
first  in  the  orchard  to  bear,  yielded  32  nuts,  which  are  said  to  have 
weighed  1  pound.  The  following  year  its  crop  was  2\  pounds,  increas- 
ing annually  until  1902,  when  it  yielded  4h  bushels  of  nuts.  Its  bud 
propagation,  begun  in  that  year,  has  resulted  in  such  heavy  cutting  of 
the  young  wood  that  the  crops  since  then  have  been  comparatively 
light. 

DESCRIPTION. 

Size  large  to  very  large,  averaging  40  to  50  nuts  per  pound;  form 
round  ovate,  with  a  tendency  toward  inequality  of  sides;  color  rather 
dull  and  dark  grayish  brown,  sparsely  striped  with  black;  shell  rather 
thick,  with  moderately  thick  and  soft  partitions,  yet  cracking  well; 
kernel  broad,  plump,  rather  bright  and  very  attractive;  texture 
rather  soft  and  inclined  to  be  coarse,  though  of  pleasant  flavor  and 
excellent  quality. 

The  specimens  illustrated  on  Plate  XXXII  were  grown  by  the  G.  M. 
Bacon  Pecan  Company,  at  Dewitt,  Ga. 

The  tree  is  a  sturdy,  strong  grower,  precocious  and  productive,  and 
worthy  of  thorough  test  throughout  Georgia  and  adjacent  States. 

Delmas  Pecax. 

The  original  Delmas  pecan  tree  was  grown  from  a  nut  planted  by 
Mr.  A.  G.  Delmas  at  his  place  at  Scranton,  Miss.,  about  1877.  It 
began  bearing  in  1884,  and  has  been  known  under  the  name  Delmas 
since  the  following  year.  It  was  propagated  in  a  limited  way  by  Mr. 
Delmas  about  1890  by  grafting  both  in  nursery  and  orchard.  Its  gen- 
eral dissemination,  however,  appears  to  have  occurred  in  connection 
with  the  "Schley"  about  1902,  mixed  scions  of  the  two  varieties 
received  from  Mr.  Delmas  having  been  grafted  in  the  Pierson  nursery, 
at  Monticello,  Fla.,  and  disseminated  under  the  name  Schley  before 
the  admixture  was  discovered.  The  wood  of  the  Delmas  is  so  much 
stouter  and  more  erect  than  that  of  the  Schley  variety  that  little  diffi- 
culty is  experienced  in  separating  them  even  in  the  nursery  row. 

The  original  Delmas  tree  was  blown  down  by  the  September  storm 
of  1906  before  the  crop  was  ripe,  but  was  severely  headed  back  soon 
thereafter  and  righted,  so  that  it  is  hoped  it  will  survive. 

a  Letter  from  II.  C.  White.  Dewitt.  Ga..  January.  1907. 
3    Aui0B 24 


370  tEA  TLTUEE. 


.  2  _  50  nuts  per  pound ;  form 

iuntly  (ji  jular 

rked  ,-ieuous  ridges  extending 

-  of  the  nut:  color  grayish  brow:    - 

iek,  with  partitions  soft 
good  plump  and    well  filled. 

arrow,  but  shallow,  and   surface  undulating:  k  i 

".■•"-•:  textu:  and  open;  flavor 

XXXII  were  grown  by  Mr.  A.  G. 
I 

.  erect  and  roundish  head,  very,  dis- 
I   from  the  Schl  ith  which  it  has  been  somewhat  mixed  in 

.  Is.     It  is  productive  and  promising  for  the  tower 
I  region,  where  it  originated. 


FREIGHT  COSTS  AND  MARKET  YALIES. 

By  Frank  Andrews, 
Scientific  Assistant  in  Transportation,  Division  of  Foreign  Markets,  Bureau  of  Statistics. 

FREIGHT    COSTS    AND    MARKET    VALUES    OF    COTTON    AND    WHEAT. 

It  is  well  known  that  goods  whose  value  is  high  in  proportion  to 
their  weight  are  likely  to  be  charged  higher  freight  rates  than  goods 
of  relatively  low  value.  It  is  understood,  however,  that  value  is  not 
the  only  condition  affecting  freight  charges;  under  some  circum- 
stances a  higher  rate  may  be  charged  for  a  less  valuable  than  for  a 
more  valuable  commodity  between  the  same  points.  The  influence 
of  value  and  weight  upon  the  cost  of  carrying  is  illustrated  in  the 
case  of  two  of  the  most  important  farm  products  of  the  United 
States — cotton  and  wheat.  And  it  is  of  no  little  interest  to  note  that 
this  rule  of  freight  traffic  applies  to  the  cost  incurred  by  farmers  in 
hauling  their  products  from  farms  to  shipping  points. 

An  investigation  was  made  by  the  writer,  under  the  authority  of 
the  Bureau  of  Statistics  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture,  in  Sep- 
tember, 1906,  to  learn  certain  facts  about  hauling  farm  products  on 
country  roads,  and  from  results  of  this  inquiry  it  is  estimated  that 
it  costs  an  average  of  16  cents  per  100  pounds  to  haul  cotton  from 
farms  to  shipping  points,  while  the  cost  for  wheat  is  9  cents.  The 
average  distance  of  cotton  farms  from  local  shipping  points  is  ll.S 
miles,  the  average  weight  of  a  wagonload  of  cotton  is  1,702  pounds, 
and  the  average  cost  of  hauling  the  load,  $2.76;  the  corresponding 
averages  for  wheat  are  9.4  miles,  3,323  pounds,  and  $2.86.  It  is 
plain  that  cotton  may  be  profitably  hauled  for  greater  distances  and 
in  smaller  loads  than  wheat,  since  the  value  of  an  average  load  of 
the  cotton  picked  in  1905  was  more  than  $170,  while  a  load  of  wheat 
was  worth  about  $40. 

CHARGING    WHAT    THE    TRAFFIC    WILL    BEAR. 

The  average  railway  freight  rate  for  cotton  from  local  shipping 
points  to  seaports  is  estimated  at  40  cents  per  100  pounds,  while 
the  corresponding  rate  for  wheat  is  about  20  cents.  This  difference 
in  railway  charges  between  these  two  commodities  illustrates  the 
tendency  of  value  to  influence  transportation  costs,  and  also  shows 
one  of  the  several  phases  of  the  principle  of  railway  rate  making 
which  is  often  described  as  "charging  what  the  traffic  will  bear." 

371 


372     YEARBOOK  OF  THE  DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE. 
RELATIVE  VALUES  AND  OCEAN"  RATES. 

On  the  ocean,  also,  freight  charges  for  cotton  are  higher  than 
those  for  wheat.  The  rates  quoted  for  regular  lines  of  steamers  for 
canning  cotton  from  Galveston.  New  Orleans,  and  New  York  to 
Liverpool  averaged  during  the  year  ending  June  30.  190(3.  about  32 
cents  per  100  pounds,  while  the  corresponding  rate  for  wheat  was 
only  one-fourth  that  sum.  or  S  cents  per  100  pounds.  A  cargo  of 
cotton  shipped  from  Galveston  to  Liverpool  frequently  contains  as 
much  as  5,51  pounds,  and  the  value  in  1005-6  of  such  a  cargo 

at  Galveston  was  not  far  from  $600,000,  while  the  same  quantity  of 
wheat  would  have  been  worth  from  870.000  to  890.000.  The  entire 
cost  of  carrying  this  amount  of  cotton  from  the  farms  in  the  United 
States  to  Liverpool,  not  including  costs  of  transfer  and  terminal 
charges,  at  the  average  rates  estimated  in  this  article,  would  be 
about  -Soil. 000.  while  the  corresponding  cost  for  wheat  would  be 
12 

COTTON. 

COST    OF    HaTLING    FROM    FARMS. 

The  cost  of  hauling  cotton  and  certain  other  products  from  farms 
to  shipping  points  has  been  determined  with  the  aid  of  the  county 
correspondents-  of  the  Bureau  of  Statistics  of  the  Department  of 
ulture.  In  answer  to  questions  sent  out  by  the  Department 
in  August.  1900.  correspondents  in  555  cotton-producing  counties 
returned,  in  addition  to  other  data,  information  as  to  the  number  of 
pounds  of  cotton  usually  hauled  at  one  load,  the  time  required  for 
the  longest  haul  by  any  considerable  number  of  fanners,  and  the 
usual  cost  per  day  for  hiring  teams. 

The  cost  of  hauling  a  wagonload  of  cotton  from  the  farm  as  deter- 
mined here  is  the  cost  of  hiring  such  work  done,  though  it  is  usual 
for  a  farmer  to  do  his  own  hauling  and  not  to  hire  such  work  done. 
The  actual  cost  to  an  individual  farmer  at  a  given  time  may  vary 
ly  from  the  usual  cost  of  hiring  a  team,  wagon,  and  driver:  he 
may  haul  his  cotton  when  he  has  nothing  else  to  do  and  when  his 
team  would  be  otherwise  idle,  or  he  may  be  compelled  to  haul  at  a 
time  and  under  conditions  that  may  involve  no  little  sacrifice  of 
labor  and  expense.  However,  in  determining  an  average  value  of 
the  service  of  hauling  it  may  be  assumed  that  in  a  given  community 
usual  cost  per  day  for  hiring  a  team,  wagon,  and  driver  is  a  fair 
measure  in  that  community  of  the  average  outlay  of  capital  and  labor 
required  to  perform  the  service  in  question. 

TWO    REGIONS    COMPARED. 

By  this  method  .the  cost  of  hauling  cotton  from  farms  in  the  South 
Atlantic  States  was  found  to  be  13  cents  per  100  pounds,  while  the 


FREIGHT    COSTS    AND    MARKET    VALUES.  373 

average  for  all  the  cotton  regions  west  of  Georgia  and  the  Allegheny 
Mountains  was  17  cents.  The  difference  in  cost  between  the  two 
regions  was  due  chiefly  to  the  difference  in  the  average  distances 
from  farms  to  shipping  points,  the  distance  for  the  South  Atlantic 
States  being  9.6  miles  and  for  the  South  Central  States  and  Terri- 
tories 12.7  miles. 

FREIGHT    RATES    TO    SEAPORTS. 

Nearly  three-fourths  of  the  cotton  arriving  at  Galveston  is  carried 
by  railroads  at  a  uniform  rate,  and  comes  from  stations  serving  a 
large  part  of  the  area  of  the  State  of  Texas.  The  railroad"  freight 
rate  from  Texas  "common  points''  to  Galveston  was  55  cents  per 
100  pounds  during  the  year  ending  June  30,  1906.  Of  the  188 
Texas  counties  which  produced  cotton  in  1905,  118  were  in  the  region 
to  which  the  "common  points"  rate  of  55  cents  applied.  The  usual 
rate  for  stations  in  14  counties  was  65  cents,  for  7  counties  58  cents, 
5  counties  49  cents,  4  counties  66  cents,  4  other  counties  54  cents, 
2  others  63  cents,  while  the  rates  to  Galveston  from  stations  in  34 
counties,  which  were  situated  between  the  region  of  the  "common 
points"  and  Galveston,  ranged  from  6  to  48  cents  per  100  pounds. 
The  average  rate  from  all  points  in  Texas,  taking  into  account  the 
quantity  of  cotton  affected  by  each  rate  quoted,  was  52.9  cents  per 
100  pounds.  The  average  cost  of  shipping  cotton  from  Indian  Ter- 
ritory to  Galveston  during  the  year  just  mentioned  is  estimated 
roughly  at  66  cents  per  100  pounds,  and  the  average  rate  from  Okla- 
homa to  Galveston  is  estimated  at  72  cents  per  100  pounds. 

GALVESTON,  NEW    ORLEANS,    VXD   SAVANNAH. 

Taking  into  account  the  relative  quantity  of  cotton  produced  in 
the  region  affected  by  each  rate,  the  average  charge  to  Galveston 
from  local  stations  in  Texas,  Indian  Territory,  and  Oklahoma  during 
the  year  mentioned  was  54  cents  per  100  pounds. 

Average  rates  from  points  of  original  shipment  to  Xew  Orleans, 
Savannah,  and  Xew  York  were  estimated  by  adding  the  rates  given 
for  a  large  number  of  representative  local  shipping  points  and 
dividing  the  sum  by  the  number  of  items.  In  this  manner  the  mean 
rate  to  Xew  Orleans  from  347  stations  in  Mississippi,  Louisiana,  and 
Tennessee  was  SI.  14  per  bale,  or  about  23  cents  per  100  pounds. 
Cotton  sent  to  Savannah  from  738  stations  in  Georgia,  South  Caro- 
lina, Florida,  and  eastern  Alabama  was  charged  a  mean  rate  of  41 
cents  per  100  pounds. 

ROUTES    AND    CHARGES    TO    XEW    YORK    CITY. 

Consignments  of  cotton  to  New  York  City  from  local  stations  in 
the  cotton  regions  may  be  carried  all  the  way  in  freight  cars  or  may 
be  sent  down  to  some  southern  port  and  there  transferred  to  one  of 


374  YEAEBOOK    OF    I  IfKNT    DP    AGFJCTLTUF.E. 

the  lines  of  coasting  vessels  for  shipment  northward.     The  charges 
on  cotton  to  New  York  are  from  20  to  25  cents  higher  than  the  . 
from  the  same  stations  to  New  Orleans  and  Savannah.     The  r 
rate  per  100  pounds  to  New  York  from  2981  -  -  ssippi, 

by  railroad  routes  exclusively,  was  4s  cents,         _  Ls  more  than 

the  rate  to  New  Orleans  as  given  above,  and  the  mean  rate  to 
York  from  402  stations  in  North  and  South  Carolina.  Georgia,  and 

tii  Alabama  was  05  cents  by  all-rail  routes  and  59  cents  by  : 
and-water  routes.     These  charges,  it  will  be  seen,  are  from  IS  I 
cents  above  the  rates  from  practically  the  same  regie  -   vannah. 

The  mean  freight  charge  to  New  York  from  700  local  points  among 
the    cotton   fields   in   Mississippi,    Xorth   Carolina,    South   Carolina, 
Georgia,  and  eastern  Alabama  is  taken  as  54  cents  per  100  pounds, 
the   same    as   the   estimated   average   rate   from   stations  in   Tl 
Oklahoma,  and  Indian  Territory  down  to  Galveston. 

PRICES    AT    WW 

If  the  relative  quantity  of  cotton  exported  from  each  port  be  taken 
into  account,  the  average  of  the  freight  rates  on  cotton  to  Galvesi 
Xew  Orleans,  Savannah,  and  Xew  York  from  local  shipping  points 
would  be  40  cents  per  100  pounds.  At  the  four  cities  named  the 
mean  of  the  daily  closing  prices  for  Upland  middling  t(  n  for  the 
year  ending  June  30,  1000.  was  11  cents  per  pound,  which  was  about 
the  same  as  the  average  export  value  of  all  cotton  for  all  United 
States  ports  during  this  year.  The  mean  annual  price  at  Xew 
Orleans  and  also  at  Galveston  was  11  cents,  at  Savannah  10.S.  and 
at  Xew  York  11.3  cents  per  pound.  Thus  it  appears  that  in  1005-6 
the  value  of  cotton  at  the  seaboard  was  twenty  times  the  cost  of 
transporting  that  product  there  from  the  farms,  the  freight  chai 
plus  the  cost  of  hauling  in  wagons  being  50  cents  per  100  pounds. 

TWO    CLASSES    OF    OOEAX    FREIGHT    TRA} 

Ocean  freight  charges  are  subject  to  more  frequent  changes  than 
are  railroad  rates.  On  the  ocean  competition  is  practically  free, 
for  any  man  with  a  ship  may  compete  for  business.  If  the  vessels  at 
a  certain  port  have  a  large  amount  of  available  space  for  cargo  and 
the  quantity  of  goods  to  be  shipped  is  relatively  small,  freight  rates 
are  apt  to  be  low.  Such  a  condition  may  easily  occur  when  pass- 
enger  liners  are  in  port,  for  their  dates  of  sailing  are  fixed  by  a  sched- 
ule previously  arranged,  and  they  must  start  on  time  whether  their 
cargoes  be  largo  or  small.  Quotations  of  freight  rates  on  goods 
ied  by  steamship  lines  are  published  regularly  in  the  leading 
ports  on  the  Atlantic  and  Gulf  coasts  of  the  Umu  -  -  The 
mean  of  the  quotations  for  cotton  to  Liverpool  for  the  first  week  of 
each  month  dining  the  year  1905-6  was  33  cents  par  100  ix>unds  from 


FEEIGHT    COSTS    AJSTB    MARKET    VALUES.  375 

New  Orleans  and  17  cents  from  New  York.  The  rates  from  Gal- 
veston and  other  leading  Gulf  ports  are  regarded  as  practically  the 
same  as  those  from  New  Orleans. 

Besides  the  regular  lines  of  vessels,  there  are  a  large  number  of  ships 

engaged  in  freight   traffic  which  have  no  regular  routes,  but  make 

contracts  frequently  for  a  single  voyage  at  a  time.     On  account  of 

their    wanderings    throughout    the    commercial    world    these    vessels 

sometimes  called  "tramps." 

ONE  TEAK'S  RECORD  OF  A  '"TRAMP'5'  STEAMER. 

An  account  of  the  first  year's  work  of  one  of  these  "tramps" 
appeared  in  a  daily  paper  in  September.  1906.  The  A'essel  in  ques- 
tion was  built  in  England  and  on  its  first  voyage  carried  a  cargo  of 
coal  from  Cardiff,  Wales,  to  Algiers.  The  next  trip  was  in  search  of 
business  and  the  ship  went  in  ballast  from  Algiers  to  Port  Arthur, 
Tex.,  whence  a  cargo  of  cotton  and  cotton  seed  was  taken  to  Bremen, 
Germany.  Again  a  voyage  in  search  of  freight  was  made,  and  at 
Cardiff  a  second  load  of  coal  was  taken  aboard;  this  time  the  desti- 
nation was  Teneriffe,  in  the  Canary  Islands.  Then  a  second  voyage 
was  made  across  the  Atlantic  without  cargo,  and  this  time  also  bus- 
iness was  found  at  Port  Arthur,  Tex.,  where  corn  was  leaded  for 
Sharpness,  England.  Another  voyage  in  ballast  brought  the  ship 
to  Bremen  and  the  load  of  kaiiiit  received  there  was  taken  to  Savan- 
nah. Leaving  Savannah  and  sailing  up  the  coast,  again  in  ballast, 
the  vessel  ended  its  first  year  of  service  as  it  entered  the  harbor  of 
Baltimore.  Here  it  was  to  receive  a  full  cargo  of  grain  for  the  Baltic 
Sea.  Some  ships  are  not  so  successful  as  this  one  in  finding  cargoes 
and  occasionally  lie  idle  for  months  at  a  time  waiting  for  employment. 

AVERAGE    OCEAN"    RATE    OX    COTTC'X. 

The  average  ocean  rate  on  cotton  from  the  United  States  to  Liver- 
pool for  the  year  1905-6  was  about  32  cents  per  100  pounds,  exclud- 
ing terminal  charges,  the  same  as  the  annual  mean  of  the  quoted  rates 
from  Savannah  to  the  United  Kingdom.  It  will  be  noted  also  that 
the  average  railway  rate  from  all  local  points  to  all  ports,- as  estimated 
above,  was  40  cents,  while  the  charge  from  local  points  to  Savannah 
was  41  cents  per  100  pounds.  In  regard  to  both  land  and  water 
rates  Savannah  occupies  a  medium  position. 

VALUES    IN"    EXGLAXD. 

The  sum  of  the  cost  per  100  pounds  for  transporting  cotton  on 
country  roads,  on  United  States  railroads,  and  across  the  Atlantic, 
as  estimated  above,  is  SS  cents,  and,  with  an  allowance  of  2  cents  for 
transfer  to  ship  at  some  United  States  ports,  the  entire  cost  of  carry- 
ing may  be  taken  as  90  cents  per  100  pounds. 


376  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

The  mean  price  of  cotton  in  England  for  the  twelve  months  ending 
June  30,  1906,  was  about  12  cents  per  pound;  the  annual  mean  of 
the  cash  prices  for  Upland  middling  cotton  at  this  market  at  the  close 
of  each  business  day  for  the  year  mentioned  was  12.1  cents. 

The  difference  in  price  between  the  four  leading  cotton  ports  of 
the  United  States  and  Liverpool  was  1.1  cents  per  pound,  while  the 
cost  of  carrying  the  cotton  across  the  ocean  was  about  one-third  of 
1  cent  per  pound,  leaving  two-thirds  of  1  cent  for  profits  and  other 
items,  such  as  insurance,  selling  commissions,  and  cartage.  The 
total  cost  of  transportation  from  United  States  farms  to  Liverpool, 
including  cost  of  transfer  to  ships  at  United  States  ports,  was  about 
7.5  per  cent  of  the  value  of  the  cotton  in  that  city. 

SUMMARY    OF   FREIGHT    CHARGES    ON    COTTON. 

The  total  cost  of  hauling  the  cotton  crop  of  1905  from  farms  to 
shipping  points,  at  the  rate  of  16  cents  per  100  pounds,  as  estab- 
lished by  the  investigation  mentioned  near  the  beginning  of  this 
article,  would  be  $8,000,000;  and  the  cost  of  carrying  that  portion 
of  the  cotton  crop  which  was  exported  to  Europe  from  farms  in  the 
United  States,  at  the  rate  of  90  cents  per  100  pounds,  would  amount 
to  $33,000,000,  of  winch  the  cost  of  hauling  from  farms  would  be 
86,000,000,  freight  charges  to  seaboard  cities  815,000,000,  and  ocean 
transportation,  including  transfer  to  ship,  812,000,000. 

A  summary  of  the  transportation  costs  for  cotton  mentioned  in 
the   preceding  paragraphs  is  given  below: 

E*t' incited  average  costs  of  carrying  cotton  in  the  United  States  and  to  the  United  Kingdom 

during  the  year  eliding  June  SO,  1906. 

_  Cents  per 

Jnrom —  100  pounds. 

Farm?  in  555  cotton-producing  counties,  by  wagon,  to  local  shipping  points. .  16 

200  local  points  in  Texas,  Indian  Territory,  and  Oklahoma,  by  all-rail  routes, 

to  Galveston 54 

347  local  points  in  Mississippi.  Louisiana,  and  Tennessee,  by  all-rail  routes. 

to  N  ew  Orleans 23 

-  local  points  in  Georgia,  South  Carolina,  Florida,  and  eastern  Alabama, 

by  all-rail  routes,  to  Savannah 41 

298  local  points  in  Mississippi,  by  all-rail  routes,  to  New  York 48 

402  local  points  in   North   Carolina,   South   Carolina.    Georgia,  and  eastern 

Alabama — 

By  all-rail  routes  to  New  York G5 

By  rail-and-water  routes  to  New  York 59 

Local  shipping  point-  to  seaports,  average  lor  United  States 40 

Gulf  ports  and  New  York,  by  regular  steamship  lines,  to  Liverpool 32 

Savannah,  by  chartered  vessels,  to  the  United  Kingdom 32 

United  States  to  United  Kingdom,  average  for  all  ports 32 


FREIGHT    COSTS    AND    MARKET    VALUES.  377 


WHEAT. 
FROM    FARMS    TO    LOCAL    SHIPPING    POINTS. 


The  average  cost  of  9  cents  per  hundredweight  for  hauling  wheat 
from  farms  to  shipping  points,  as  mentioned,  at  the  beginning  of 
this  article,  was  obtained  by  the  use  of  returns  from  1,051  wheat- 
producing  counties.  The  cost  for  the  Xorth  Central  States  is  S  cents 
per  100  pounds,  but  in  Kansas.  Ohio.  Indiana,  and  Michigan  the  rate 
is  6  cents,  and  farmers  in  Illinois,  Wisconsin,  Minnesota,  Iowa,  and 
Nebraska  do  this  hauling  at  an  average  cost  of  7  cents  per  100 
pounds.  In  Missouri  the  mean  cost  is  9  cents  per  100  pounds,  in 
Xorth  Dakota  10  cents,  and  in  South  Dakota  11  cents  per  100  pounds. 
In  the  wheat  region  west  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  the  average  cost 
is  10  cents  per  100  pounds,  the  relatively  high  rate  being  largely  due 
to  the  long  distances  over  which  the  grain  is  moved. 

The  average  farm  value  of  wheat,  as  given  by  the  Department  of 
Agriculture,  is  the  price  at  the  local  shipping  points,  for  practically 
all  wheat  is  sold  by  farmers  at  a  price  which  includes  delivery  at 
some  local  market  or  shipping  point.  The  average  farm  value  of 
wheat  in  the  United  States  on  December  1.  1905.  was  74. S  cents  per 
bushel,  and  the  average  cost  to  the  farmers  of  delivering  this  wheat 
at  9  cents  per  100  pounds  is  5.4  cents  per  bushel.  Hence  the  actual 
value  on  the  farm  would  be  69.4  cents  per  bushel.  As  the  wheat 
crop  of  1905,  excluding  seed,  was  about  622,000,000  bushels,  the 
cost  of  hauling  the  crop  from  farms  to  places  of  local  delivery  may 
be  given  as  834.000,000,  while  the  total  value  of  the  crop  delivered 
at  these  markets  and  shipping  points  was  8465,000,000. 


RAILWAY    CHARGES    TO    INTERIOR    MARKETS. 


From  the  wheat  regions  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  large  quan- 
tities of  the  grain  are  gathered  into  such  interior  cities  as  Minneapolis, 
Chicago,  and  Kansas  City.  The  mean  of  the  railway  freight  rates 
on  wheat  from  562  local  stations  in  Illinois  and  Nebraska  to  Chicago 
in  1905-6  was  16  cents  per  100  pounds,  the  same  as  the  mean  rate 
to  Minneapolis  from  311  local  stations  in  Minnesota,  Xorth  Dakota, 
South  Dakota,  and  Nebraska.  In  estimating  the  mean  charge  to 
Chicago  from  all  local  shipping  points,  rates  from  Illinois  and  Nebraska 
were  taken  as  typical  of  low  and  high  rates,  respectively.  To  Kansas 
City,  from  456  stations  in  Kansas.  Missouri,  and  Oklahoma,  the  mean 
rate  is  found  to  be  about  14  cents  per  100  pounds.  Making  allow- 
ances for  the  relative  quantities  of  wheat  received  at  each  of  these 
three  primary  markets  during  the  year  1905-6,  the  average  rate  on 
wheat  from  local  shipping  points  to  primary  markets  in  1905-6  was 
15.5  cents  per  100  pounds,  which,  added  to  the  average  cost  of  haul- 
ing wheat  from  farms  in  the  North  Central  States,  makes  a  total  cost 


37S  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

of  transportation  of  24.5  cents  per  100  pounds,  or  14.7  cents  per 
bushel  from  farm  to  primary  market. 

JDSS    AND    VALVES    OF    WHEAT. 

No  attempt  is  made  here  to  obtain  an  average  market  value  for 
all  wheat  received  at  one  or  more  leading  markets.  In  the  case 
of  cotton,  it  was  found  that  the  price  for  the  Upland  middling  grade 
at  the  leading  United  States  ports  and  at  Liverpool  was  approxi- 
mately the  average  for  the  entire  crop.  But  important  grad- 
wheat  are  too  numerous  for  such  a  method  of  obtaining  an  average 
value.  At  one  city  the  principal  grade  may  be  "No.  2  red  winter." 
while  "Xo.  1  northern"  may  predominate  in  another  market.  Then 
the  various  practices  and  standards  of  grading  wheat  at  the  different 
trade  centers  give  rise  to  still  more  classes  for  which  price  quotations 
are  made. 

MINNEAPOLIS    AND    CHICAGO. 

The  mean  annual  price  of  Xo.  1  northern  wheat  at  Minneapolis 
for  1905-6  was  86.3  cents,  and  the  mean  freight  rate  from  311  sta- 
tions in  Minnesota.  North  Dakota.  South  Dakota,  and  Xebraska 
-  ».6  cents  per  bushel.  The  average  price  of  wheat  at  local  ship- 
ping points  in  these  four  States  on  December  1.  1005.  was  68.6  eents 
per  bushel,  so  that  the  cost  of  this  wheat  at  Minneapolis  would  be 
7-  _  cents,  plus  such  items  as  elevator  charges,  fees  for  in.-pection 
and  weighing,  and  dealers'  profits,  making  a  total  cost  of  probably 
n<»t  more  than  80  cents  per  bushel,  or  about  6  cents  less  than  the 
value  of  No.  1  northern. 

At  Chicago  the  mean  price  of  Xo.  2  red  winter  wheat  for  the  rear 
named  was  S6.9  cents,  and  the  average  farm  price  in  Xebraska  and 
Illinois  for  all  wheat  on  December  1,  1905,  was  71. S  cents,  including 
of  hauling  from  farms,  while  the  mean  freight  rate  to  Chicago 
from  local  stations  in  those  two  States  was  0.6  cents  per  bushel. 
V  c  >rdins  to  these  figures  all  the  marketable  grades  of  Xebraska 
and  Illinois  wheat  were  worth,  in  the  Chicago  market,  probably 
about   S3  cents  per  bushel,  or  3.0  cents  less  than  Xo.  2  rati  winter. 

RATES    AND    PRICES    AT    KANSAS    CITY. 

In  Kansas.  Nebraska,  Missouri,  and  Oklahoma  the  average  value 
of  wheat  at  local  points  December  1.  1005.  was  70. S  cents,  and  the 
mean  freight  charge  from  these  stations  to  Kansas  City  was  8.4 
cents  per  bushel.  The  cost.  then,  at  Kansas  City,  would  be  70.2  cents, 
plus  minor  charges.  The  mean  annual  value  of  Xo.  2  hard  wheat 
at  this  market  for  1905-6  was  81.1  cents.  In  this  case,  the  only  one 
of  the  three  mentioned,  there  i>  an  approximate  agreement  in  the 
prices  used:  the  farm  value  and  the  price  at  the  primary  market 
seem  to  apply  to  grades  of  about  the  same  average  quality. 


FRSIOHT    COSTS    AND    MARKET    VALUES.  379 

The  average  of  the  three  prices  just  mentioned  for  Chicago,  Min- 
neapolis, and  Kansas  City,  allowing  for  the  relative  importance  of 
each  price  in  proportion  to  the  quantity  of  wheat  received  at  each 
market,  is  85.1  cents  per  bushel,  and  the  average  farm  value,  includ- 
ing cost  of  hauling,  of  the  crop  in  the  States  and  Territory  named, 
was  70.8  cents.  The  average  freight  rate  being  9.3  cents,  the  average 
value  on  December  1,  1905,  at  the  three  primary  markets  for  all 
marketable  grades  of  the  wheat  of  this  region,  would  be  probably 
not  more  than  S2  cents.  This  would  make  only  3.1  cents  difference 
between  the  average  value  of  all  wheat  and  the  price  of  three  of  the 
better  grades. 

RAIL  AND  WATER  ROUTES  TO  SEABOARD. 

From  the  interior  wheat  markets  to  the  seaboard  there  are  two 
general  routes,  one  eastward  to  Atlantic  ports  and  the  other  leading 
south  to  the  Gulf  of  Mexico.  Along  the  eastward  routes  the  rail- 
roads have  to  share  their  traffic  with  the  waterways  formed  by  the 
Great  Lakes  and  the  connecting  rivers  and  canals. 

The  Mississippi  River  is  a  potential  although  not  always  an  active 
competitor  for  the  traffic  from  the  wheat  regions  to  New  Orleans. 
During  1904  and  1905  practically  no  wheat  was  carried  by  river 
from  St.  Louis  to  New  Orleans. 

RATES    FROM    PRIMARY    MARKETS. 

The  freight  charge  from  Chicago  to  New  York  or  Boston  for  wheat 
intended  for  export  was  15  cents  per  100  pounds  in  1905-6,  by  all-rail 
routes.  During  the  same  year  boats  on  the  Great  Lakes  were  chartered 
to  cany  wheat  from  Chicago  to  Buffalo  at  rates  ranging  from  1.25 
to  3  cents  per  bushel,  and  the  railway  charge  from  Buffalo  to  New 
York  was  4.5  cents  per  bushel  on  wheat  intended  for  export. 

The  lake-and-rail  rate,  then,  from  Chicago  to  New  York  ranged 
between  5.75  and  7.50  cents  per  bushel.  Shipments  by  way  of  the 
lakes  and  Erie  Canal  were  sent  at  still  lower  rates.  During  the 
calendar  year  1905  the  mean  rate  by  lake  and  canal  to  New  York  from 
Chicago  was  5.53  cents  per  bushel,  by  lake  and  rail  the  rate  was 
6.40  cents,  and  the  railroads  charged  9.90  cents  for  carrying  the 
wheat  the  entire  distance.  The  all-rail  rate  from  Chicago  to  Balti- 
more and  Norfolk  was  3  cents  per  100  pounds  less  than  the  rate  to 
New  York  or  Boston  and  1  cent  below  the  charge  to  Philadelphia,  on 
exported  wheat.  The  mean  all-rail  rate  on  exported  wheat  from 
Chicago  to  the  Atlantic  seaboard  may  be  taken  as  about  13  cents  per 
100  pounds,  or  7.8  cents  per  bushel.  On  wheat  intended  for  domestic 
consumption  the  rate  to  Boston  from  Chicago  was  4.5  cents  per  100 
pounds  above  the  export  rate,  and  the  mean  rate  on  domestic  wheat 
from  Chicago  to  Boston,  New  York,  Philadelphia,  Baltimore,  and 
Norfolk,  exceeded  the  mean  export  rate  by  3  cents  per  100  pounds,  or 
l.S  cents  per  bushel. 


380  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


DIRECT    SHIPMENTS    AT    LOWER    RATES. 


The  average  rate  on  wheat  from  local  points  in  the  interior  to  the 
Atlantic  and  Gulf  coasts  is  less  than  the  sum  of  the  charge  from 
those  points  to  primary  markets  plus  the  charge  from  these  markets 
to  the  seaboard.  It  ma}'  be  assumed  that  the  cost  of  shipment  to 
the  coast  from  Kansas  City,  Omaha,  and  Minneapolis  is  not  less  than 
the  average  from  local  points  in  the  wheat  region  surrounding  those 
cities  and  is  probably  greater  than  the  rates  from  many  important 
shipping  points  lying  near  the  seaports.  The  mean  rate  from  local 
stations  in  the  wheat  region  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  to  the 
Atlantic  seaboard  is  taken  as  13.4  cents  per  bushel,  which  is  the 
mean  rate  from  Kansas  City  and  Omaha  to  that  coast,  and  the  rate  to 
the  Gulf  as  10.8  cents,  the  same  as  from  Kansas  City  to  New  Orleans 
and  Galveston.  The  average  rate  from  local  shipping  points  to  both 
coasts,  allowing  for  the  relative  quantity  of  wheat  exported  from  each, 
would  be  12.6  cents  per  bushel. 


SHIPS    CHEAPER    CARRIERS    THAN    WAGONS. 


Ocean  rates  were  higher  than  usual  during  the  year  1905-6,  and 
the  mean  charge  for  carrying  wheat  by  regular  steamship  lines  to 
Liverpool  from  New  York,  a  distance  of  about  3,100  miles,  was  3.8 
cents  per  bushel,  or  1.6  cents  less  than  it  cost  a  farmer  to  haul  the 
wheat  9 .4  miles  from  his  farm  to  a  neighboring  railroad  station.  Some- 
times the  rate  on  wheat  from  an  Atlantic  port  in  the  United  States  to 
Liverpool  is  as  low  as  1.5  cents  per  bushel,  or  3.9  cents  less  than 
the  average  cost  of  hauling  from  the  farms.  The  cost  of  shipment 
in  chartered  vessels  from  Baltimore  to  ports  in  the  United  Kingdom 
for  the  }rear  1905-6  was  about  7.8  cents  per  bushel  on  an  average, 
a  cost  much  higher  than  the  rate  charged  by  vessels  of  regular  lines, 
and  2.4  cents  more  than  the  cost  of  wagon  transportation.  The  mean 
rate  by  regular  lines  from  New  Orleans  was  about  6.8  cents  per  bushel 
and  may  be  taken  to  represent  the  Gulf  coast  as  the  New  York  rate 
is  in  general  typical  of  the  rates  from  Atlantic  ports. 

The  large  number  of  grain  ships  chartered  at  Baltimore  during 
1905-6  makes  it  fairly  safe  to  take  the  cost  of  charters  at  that  port 
as  an  approximate  average  for  the  whole  coast  and  not  far  removed 
from  charter  rates  from  the  Gulf  to  England.  The  average  of  the 
rates  on  wheat  to  Liverpool  by  regular  lines  from  New  Orleans  and 
New  York  and  by  chartered  vessels  from  Baltimore,  not  including 
costs  of  transfer,  may  be  taken  as  4.8  cents  per  bushel,  or  0.6  cent  less 
than  the  cost  of  hauling  in  wagons  from  farms  to  shipping  points. 


PRN  ES    AT   LIVERPOOL. 


The  mean  price  at  Liverpool  for  "No.  2  red  winter"  wheat  for  five 
months  ending  June  30,  1906,  the  season  when  this  grade  was  most 
frequently  quoted  there,  was  92.6  cents  per  bushel,  and  the  cost  of 


FREIGHT    COSTS    AND    MARKET    VALUES.  3S1 

transportation  to  Liverpool  from  local  points  in  the  Middle  West  is  esti- 
mated at  17.4  cents  per  bushel.  Deducting  this  freight  charge  from 
the  price  just  quoted,  and  allowing  1.5  cents  for  profits  and  minor 
costs,  the  value  of  this  quality  of  wheat  at  local  shipping  points  in 
Illinois.  Minnesota.  Missouri.  North  Dakota.  South  Dakota.  Nebraska, 
Kansas,  and  Oklahoma  would  be  73.7  cents,  or  only  2.9  cents  per 
bushel  above  the  average  value  of  all  wheat  at  those  points. 

THE    PACIFIC    COAST. 

The  Pacific  coast  wheat  trade  has  some  features  distinct  from 
the  trade  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains.  The  wheat  exported  from 
the  Pacific  coast  to  Europe  is  carried  almost  entirely  in  sailing  vessel-. 
The  rates  quoted  for  chartering  sailing  ships  for  these  long  voyages 
showed  but  little  variation  during  the  year,  the  average  charge  to 
the  United  Kingdom  from  San  Francisco.  Portland.  Tacoma.  and 
Seattle  being  16. S  cents  per  bushel  for  wheat,  not  including  costs  of 
transfer.  Owing  to  the  small  exports  of  wheat  from  San  Francisco 
in  1905-6.  the  rates  from  that  port  have  practically  no  effect  upon 
the  average  just  mentioned. 

The  mean  of  freight  charges  to  Tacoma.  Seattle,  and  Portland  from 
459  local  stations  was  10.2  cents  per  bushel,  which,  added  to  the  ocean 
rate,  made  the  total  transportation  cost  from  these  local  points  to 
Liverpool  27  cents  per  bushel.  The  mean  Liverpool  price  for  the  year 
ending  June  30.  1906.  being  96  cents  for  white  Walla  Walla  wheat,  the 
value  at  shipping  points  near  the  farms  in  the  Pacific  Northwest 
would  be  CY^  cents,  less  minor  costs  of  marketing  the  grain.  These 
minor  costs  of  marketing  may  be  estimated  as  between  1  and  2  cents 
per  bushel,  thus  making  the  value  of  this  grade  of  wheat  in  local 
markets  near  the  farms  67  or  6S  cents  per  bushel,  being  but  a  slight 
variation  from  the  actual  average  of  all  wheat  at  these  slapping 
points,  which  on  December  1.  1905.  was  66.2  cents.  The  average  local 
value  for  the  year  1905-6  was  a  few  cents  less  than  the  price  on 
December  1. 

APPARENT    DISCREPANCIES    EXPLAINED. 

However,  if  the  mean  railway  rate  to  the  coast  from  local  points  in 
Oregon.  Washington,  and  Idaho  be  subtracted  from  the  mean  price  of 
Bluestem  wheat  at  Portland.  Oreg..  for  the  year  ending  June  30.  1906, 
which  was  74.5  cents,  the  value  of  this  variety  at  those  local  points 
would  be  64.3  cents  per  bushel,  from  which  minor  costs  of  marketing 
are  still  to  be  deducted,  and  the  net  value  would  remain  not  far  from 
63  cents.  There  is  an  apparent  discrepancy  here,  for  the  average 
value  of  all  wheat  on  December  1.  1905,  including  grades  inferior  to 
Bluestem,  was  66.2  cents  per  bushel,  or  about  3  cents  higher  than  the 
value  of  Bluestem.     A  greater  discrepancy  occurs  when  the  mean 


YEARBOOK    Or     THE    HEP..  T    OF    AGEICULTURE. 

m  club  "  _        cents  per  bush. 

i  :ed  to  a  value  at  local  shipping  points  by  subtracting  the  freight 

I  icr  bushel. 

TL  i  e  due  apparently  to  relatively  high  prices  on  the 

-ember,  1905.  the  month  in  which  the  December 

farm  values  were  actually  obtained,  and  from  this  he  farm 

for  wheat  in  Paeifk        ist  S         -      r  December  1,1! 
cents  higher  than  the  average  for  the  entire  year.     About  the  1st  of 
ember,  1905.  Bluestem  wheat  at  P   rtlan  :.  I  >:•_-..  was  quoted  at 
s,  and  the  Tacoma  price  for  northern  club  was  74.5  cents  per 
bushel.     The  average  value  of  these  grades  at  local  shipping 

.ated  by  deducting  freight  and  other  cost  from  the  mean  of  the 
st  quoted,  is  from  64.1  to  65.1  cents  per  bushel. 
1.1   or  2.1  cents  less  than  the  average  value  of  all  at  those 

poii:  rained  for  December  1. 

The  average  cost   of  hauling  wheat   from  farms  in  Washington. 
Ore-.  a  12  cents  per  100  pounds,  or  7.2  seats  per  bu 

The  .  ■  rami  price  on  December  1.  1905.  for  these  three  Sj 

being  66 .2  the  net  value  on  farms  woul  a     cents  per  bushel. 

a 

The  apparent  increase  in  the  consumption  of  wheat  in  the  United 
States  in  the  rive  years  ending  June  30.  1906.  and  the  accomparr 
decrease  in  exports  was  attended  by  a  rise  in  local  prices,  which,  if 

ibuted  proportionally  in  all  parts  of  the  country,  would  ah 
forbid  the  exportation  of  any  wheat  at  all.     During  the  year  ending 
June  30.    1902,   the  exports  of  wheat,  including  flour   (in  terms  of 
gramj,  from  the  United  States  amounted  to  235.000,000  bushels  and 
the  average  farm  value,  including  cost  of  haulin_  J. 4  cent- 

bushel.     For  the  next  four  years  the  annual  exports  and  a  v.  : 
farm  values  were,  respectively.  203.000.000  bushels  and  63  cents  per 
bushel.  121.000.000  bushels  and  69.5  cents.  44.000.000  bushels  and 
92.4  cents,  and  i  "    6  the  exports  Ave:.      3  I  bushels  and  the 

farm  value  74. S  cents  per  bushel.     The  value  of  wheat  sent  to  Liver- 
pool in  this  last-mentioned  year  and  the  freL  ng  the 
expressed  hi  averages  applying  to  the  Unite:                 -     whole,  were: 

Value  of  reheat  and  cost  of  carrying  from  T~  .*  farms  to  United  Kingdom.  1: 

Cents  per 

bushel. 

Value  on  farms  in  Unite-;  3  :  ^re  hauling 69. 4 

i  hauling  to  local  shipping  points 

farm  value,  including  cost  of  hauling 

Rail-way  freight  charges  from  local  points  to  seaport 11.  6 

Ocean  freight  charges  to  United  Kingdom 

Minor  costs  of  sale  and  shipment 

Value  at  port  in  United  Kingdom 


FREIGHT    COSTS    AKB    MAP.KET    VALUES.  3S3 

MAXIMUM    FARM    V.V1VE    OF    EXPORT    WHEAT. 

The  value  in  the  United  Kingdom  as  estimated  upon  a  basis  of  a 
farm  value  in  the  United  States  of  74. S  cents  per  bushel  (including 
cost  of  hauling)  is  a  few  cents  higher  than  the  actual  prices  of  United 
States  wheat  at  Liverpool.  The  average  import  value  of  all  wheat 
brought  into  the  United  Kingdom  from  the  United  States  during  the 
year  1905-6  was  05.0  cents,  and  the  mean  price  at  Liverpool  during 
period  for  Xo.  2  red  winter  and  "Walla  Walla  white  grades  was 
04.3  cents  per  bushel. 

-.     <>i     F.XrORTIXG    KANSAS    WHEAT. 

For  wheat  shipped  from  Kansas  for  export  th  and  frei 

rates  were  as  follows  for  the  year  ending  June  30.  1906: 

Value  of  wheat  and  cost  of  carrying  from  Kansas  fa  5-6. 

Ce:  ' 

Value  on  h  r  ■  hauling 

I  o  L  >eal  shipping  pi  'int.- 

Farm  value,  including  cost  of  hauling 

Rail  v.  .  Gulf  pot  ts 10.  8 

Ocesu         .  ol 

Min'         -  <.'\  shipment 1.5 

Value  a  t  Liverpool 

The  corresponding  value  of  wheat  shipped  from  Minnesota  to 
Liverpool  by  way  of  Xew  York  would  be  SO. 7  cents  per  bushel.  Xone 
of  these  estimates  of  value  hi  Liverpool  include  selling  costs  and 
dealers'  profits  hi  England,  which  of  course  are  included  in  the  prices 
quoted  above  for  specific  grades.  The  mean  price  hi  Liverpool  for 
Xo.  2  red  winter  grade  being  02.6  for  the  season  1005-6.  the  value 
just  estimated  for  Kansas  wheat  allows  a  margin  of  2.5  cents  for 
minor  charges  in  the  United  Kingdom  and  for  differences  between 
the  average  price  of  all  Kansas  wheat  and  the  price  of  the  Xo.  2  red 
winter  grade. 

S15IMAEY    FOR    WHEAT. 

For  the  sake  of  convenience  the  principal  transportation  costs  and 
market  values  mentioned  in  the  foregoing  discission  of  wheat  are 
collected  in  this  statement: 

Wl  'pal  values  ami  freight  charnes  mentioned  in  this  art' 

VAl 

Cents  per 
bushel. 

age  value  on  farms  in  the  United  States  before  hauling. ! 
Average  farm  value,  including  cost  of  hauling.  December  1.  1905 74.  8 


3S4  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

•  -  per 
sheL 

Average  price  in  Chicago.  Minneapolis,  and  Kansas  City,  year  ending  June  30, 

1906.  for  certain  gra  I        

Price  of  Bluest  em.  Portland,  Oreg.,  November  2,  1905 "- 

Price  of  northern  club.  Tacoma.  Wash.,  November  1,  1905 74.5 

Average  farm  value,  including  cost  oi  hauling,  Oregon,  "Washington,  and  Idaho. 

December  1.  1905 

Mean  price  No.  2  red  -winter.  Liverpool,  live  months  ending  Jam.  .....92 

Mean  price  Walla  Walla  white.  Liverpool,  for  year  1905-G 

Mean  price  of  Bluestem,  Liverpool.  1905-G 97 

FREIGHT    COSTS    FOR    YEAR    ENDING    JUNE    30.    1906. 

Hauling  from  farm  to  local  shipping  points 5.4 

Average  rate  from  1 .329  local  shipping  points  in  Illinois.  Minnesota .  Xorth  Dak 
South  Dakota.  Nebraska.  Kansas.  Missouri,  and  Oklahoma  to  Chicago.  Minne- 
apolis, and  Kansas  City 

Mean  rat e  on  export  wheat.  Chicago  to  Atlantic  ports "    i 

Mean  rate  on  export  wheat.  Missouri  River  to  Atlantic  ports 13.  4 

Average  rate  on  export  wheat.  Kansas  City.  Omaha.  St.  Paul,  and  Minneap<>".  - 

X  ew  Orleans  and  Galveston 11.4 

Average  rate  from  all  local  shipping  ports  in  above-named  States  t"  Atlantic  and 

Gulf  ports 12.6 

Average  rate  from  459  local  shipping  points  in  Oregon.  Washington,  and  Idai. 

Portland.  Tacoma.  and  Seattle 10.  2 

Average  rate  from  all  local  shipping  points  to  all  ports  in  the  United  Stales 11.  6 

Average  ocean  freight  rate.  Atlantic  and  Gulf  ports  to  the  United  Kingdom 4.  S 

Average  ocean  freight  rate.  Pacific  ports  to  the  United  Kingdom 16.  S 

Average  ocean  freight  rate,  all  United  States  ports  fa  the  United  Kingdom 9.6 

OCEAX    FREIGHT    RATES    AXD    BRITISH    IMPORTS. 

In  the  United  Kingdom,  where  a  large  part  of  the  wheat  consumed 
is  imported,  the  cost  of  ocean  transportation  is  an  important  matter. 
During  the  calendar  year  1905  the  wheat,  not  including  flour,  im- 
ported into  that  country  amounted  to  1S2,000,000  bushels  and  the 
average  cost  of  ocean  freight  was  about  9  cents  per  bushel,  thus 
making  the  total  cost  of  carrying  it  on  sea  more  than  $16,000,000. 
The  average  of  9  cents  per  bushel  was  estimated  from  the  mean 
annual  freight  rates  from  eight  leading  regions  of  supply  to  the 
United  Kingdom.  The  rates  quoted  for  all  the  countries  except  the 
United  States  and  Canada  were  taken  from  the  London  Times  and  the 
Review  of  the  River  Plate  (of  Buenos  Aires),  while  the  other  : 
were  found  in  commercial  papers  and  hi  circulars  issued  by  freight 
brokers  at  various  ports.  The  mean  annual  rates  on  wheat  from 
each  of  these  regions  to  the  United  Kingdom  for  1905  are  given  on  the 
next  page. 

No.  2  red  winter  at  Chicago,  No.  1  northern  at  Minneapolis,  and  No.  2  hard  at 
Kansas  City. 


FREIGHT    COSTS    AND    MARKET    VALUES.  385 

Mean  annual  freight  rates  on  wheat  to  the  United  Kingdom. 

t-.  Cents  per 

From—  bushel. 

Canada  : 4 

United  States.  Atlantic  and  Gulf  ports  t> 5 

Russia .  Bla<  k  Si  a  p< at s 7 

Roumania 7 

British  India 9 

Argentina 11 

Australia  ■ 14 

United  States.  Pacific  ports  & 17 

Average  d 9 

remote  Sources  of  England's  wheat  supply. 

The  effect  of  applying  to  wheat  the  same  rates  as  arc  charged  some 
other  articles  in  ocean  traffic  would  be  alarming  to  the  British  people 
and  to  all  other  nations  winch  receive  an  important  part  of  their  wheat 
supply  from  over  the  sea :  and  the  readjustment  of  prices  brought 
about  by  such  changes  in  transportation  costs  might  have  serious 
results  for  the  agricultural  interests  in  many  countries  of  supply. 
The  bread  of  England  is  made  from  wheat  carried  over  vast  distances 
and  at  rates  lower  than  would  have  been  dreamed  of  a  few  generations 
ago.  To  Liverpool  from  the  Atlantic  coast  of  the  United  States  and 
also  from  the  Black  Sea  the  grain  makes  a  journey  of  3,000  miles, 
while  twice  that  distance  is  traversed  from  the  River  Plate  and  from 
Bombay:  large  supplies  are  carried  10,000  miles  from  Australia:  and 
3,000,000  bushels  in  1905  were  taken  by  sailing  vessels  from  Puget 
Sound,  down  the  west  coast  of  America  and  around  Cape  Horn,  a 
voyage  of  15,000  miles,  or  more  than  one-half  of  the  distance  around 
the  globe.  From  these  distant  ports,  from  3,000  to  15,000  miles 
away,  the  average  charge  for  carrying  wheat  to  England  for  the  year 
19C5,  as  mentioned  in  a  preceding  paragraph,  was  9  cents  per  bushel, 
or  only  one  and  two-thirds  times  the  cost  of  hauling  over  9  miles  of 
country  roads  in  the  United  States. 

It  bhe  average  cost  of  carrying-  cotton  the  3,00o  or  4,000  miles  from 
United  States  Atlantic  and  Gulf  coasts  to  the  United  Kingdom  were 
applied  to  transportation  of  wheat  over  the  routes  mentioned  above. 
ranging  in  length  from  3,000  to  15,000  mile-,  the  rate  per  bushel 
would  be  19  cents  instead  of  9,  and  the  margin  between  prices  in 
England  and  in  countries  of  supply  would  average  10  cents  per  bushel 
more  than  in  1905. 

<7  Rate  from  Boston  used  here. 
b  Fur  year  ending  June  30.  1906. 
'Mean  rate  of  eight  quotations. 

d Weighted  in  proportion  to  imports  from  each  region  named. 
1234  a  1906 25 


386  YEARBOOK    OF    THK    DEPARTMENT    <»F    AGRICULTURE. 

FUTURE    CHANGES    IX    FREIGHT    COSTS. 

Judging-  from  the  changes  during  the  past  few  generations,  it  is 

natural  to  expect  that  costs  of  freight  on  land  and  water  may  be 
lower  in  the  future  than  at  present.  Improved  methods  of  loading 
and  unloading  freight,  economies  in  the  disposition  of  cars  and  vessels 
so  as  to  avoid  more  than  at  present  the  hauling  of  empty  car-  and  the 
making  of  voyages  in  ballast,  and  an  increase  in  the  quantity  of  valu- 
able freight  paying  high  rates  per  unit  of  weight  would  all  tend  to 
lower  the  cost  of  transporting  farm  product-. 

In  hauling  products  from  farms  in  wagons  there  are  opportunities 
for  a  saving  in  cost.  In  many  regions  in  the  United  States  the 
improvement  of  a  road,  or  a  short  rough  section  of  a  road,  would 
allow  much  larger  loads  to  be  hauled  than  at  present.  If  it  were  pos- 
sible to  increase  the  average  weight  of  a  wagonload  of  cotton  in  the 
United  States  from  3  bales,  as  it  now  is,  to  -i  bales,  without  increasing 
the  cost  of  hauling  the  load,  the  saving  on  a  crop  equal  to  the  one 
picked  in  1905  would  amount  to  $2,000,000;  and  if  the  average  load 
of  wheat,  now  55  bushels,  were  increased  by  20  bushels,  the  saving 
effected  in  '  ailing  a  crop  like  that  of  1905  would  be  more  than 
$8,000,000 


NEW  TOBACCO  VARIETIES. 

By  A.  D.  Shamkl. 
Physiologist  in  Charge  of  Tobacco  Breeding  Investigations,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

HOW    THE    NEW    VARIETIES    WERE    BRED. 

The  four  varieties  of  cigar-wrapper  tobacco  described  in  this  paper 
have  been  produced  by  the  writer  in  the  breeding  experiments  of  the 
Department  of  Agriculture.  These  experiments  were  first  undertaken 
in  the  Connecticut  Valley  in  the  fall  of  1903,  at  which  time  the  writer 
began  a  study  of  the  varieties  of  tobacco  grown  in  the  valley,  made  a 
large  number  of  crosses  of  the  native  with  standard  foreign-grown 
varieties,  and  selected  about  400  individual  seed  plants  growing  at 
that  time  in  the  fields.  These  hybrids  and  selections,  together  with 
others  made  later,  about  750  in  all,  have  been  tested,  under  the  super- 
vision of  Dr.  Herbert  J.  Webber,  Physiologist  in  Charge  of  Plant 
Breeding  Investigations,  in  the  field,  laboratory,  and  manufacturing 
establishments  during  the  past  three  seasons,  the  inferior  and  unde- 
sirable types  have  been  discarded,  and  the  valuable  types  have  been 
used  for  further  tests.  Out  of  all  the  many  selections  and  hybrids 
made  in  1903  two  hybrids  and  two  selections  have  proved  to  be 
valuable  not  only  in  the  Connecticut  Valley  but  in  other  sections  of 
the  United  States  adapted  for  growing  cigar-wrapper  varieties  of 
tobacco. 

In  the  hybridization  experiments  considerable  care  and  attention 
were  given  to  the  selection  of  varieties  used  as  parents.  The  object 
of  these  experiments  was  to  secure  varieties  of  tobacco  adapted  to 
the  soil,  climatic,  and  trade  conditions  of  the  valley,  producing  the 
size,  shape,  and  quality  of  leaves  best  suited  to  economical  cigar- 
wrapper  manufacture.  The  native  Connecticut  Valley  varieties  of 
tobacco  produce  long,  large,  and  pointed  leaves,  from  one  of  which 
it  is  possible  to  cut  only  from  two  to  four  good  cigar  wrappers.  On 
the  other  hand,  the  typical  leaf  of  the  Cuban  and  Sumatra  varieties 
of  tobacco  is  short  and  round,  from  which  the  American  cigar  maker 
cuts  from  six  to  eight  and  even  more  wrappers.  The  Cuban  and 
Sumatra  varieties  used  as  parents  in  these  experiments  were  grown 
under  shade  in  the  Connecticut  Valley  to  a  limited  extent  in  1903, 
some  of  the  plants  of  which  bore  leaves  of  the  character  that  is  most 
desirable  for  making  cigar  wrappers.      These  best  plants  were  selected 

387 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

for  breeding  and  m  ssed  with  the  best  plants  of  the  native 

onecticut    Havana    Seed    and    Broadleaf    varieties.     There    was 
usually  found  on  each  plant  about  a  dozen  flowers  at  the  right  s<    _ 
of  development  fur  -     _.     All  of  the  other  flowers  on  the  same 

I  head  were  cut  off  and  thrown  away.  The  flowers  used  for  cr<  -  - 
Lag  were  then  emasculated,  and  a  small,  one-quarter  pound,  light 
manila-paper  bag  -  laced  over  each  individual  flower.  In  about 
forty-eight  hours  the  bags  were  removed,  the  pollen  to  be  used  for 
pollination  was  dusted  over  the  receptive  stigma,  and  the  I 
replaced.     As  the  individual  pods  set  from  three  to  seven  thousand 

ich,  the  possibility  of  raising  a  large  progeny  from  every  < 
is  apparent. 

A  large  number  of  cj  sses  "ere  made,  in  one  case  using  the  Con- 
ticut  varieties  as  the  mother  parents  and  in  the  other  instance 
using  the  imported  varieties  as  the  mother  parents.  In  1904  about 
one  hundred  plants  were  grown  in  the  fipld  from  every  cross-fertilized 
pod  of  seed.  The  results  of  this  test  made  it  possible  to  weed  out  a 
large  number  of  the  unprofitable  hybrids  at  once  and  to  save  for 
planting  in  1905  a  comparatively  few  plants  from  a  few  of  the  best 
geny  rows.  Two  of  these  plants  were  so  clearly  new  and  distinct 
types  that  they  stood  out  strongly  from  all  the  rest  of  the  plants  in 
the  fields.  The  progeny  of  these  plant-  have  come  true  to  seed  in 
the  -  sons  of  1905  and  1906  and  are  recognized  as  of  such  value 
that  they  have  been  named  and  their  seed  distributed  to  a  limited 
extent  for  commercial  growing.     In  all  ^'-fertilized  seed  has 

been  used  every  y.jar  for  planting,  and  no  such  violent  breaking  up 
in  type  has  been  observed  at  any  time  as  is  the  case  with  hybrid  vari- 
eties of  corn    cotton,  and  certain  other  en     - 

The  original  selection  of  seed  plants  in  the  crop-  of  the  Connecticut 
Valley  grown  from  Florida  Sumatra  and  imported  Sumatra  seed 
were  made  in  the  s  a  of  1903.  with  a  view  to  securing  improved 
uniform  varieties  adapted  for  growing  under  shade.  In  these 
fields  the  plants  varied  in  type  to  a  remarkable  degree.  Some  of 
them  were  of  a  desirable  type,  while  many  were  wholly  worthless  for 

_    .-wrapper  produce 

In  these  fields  the  writer  found  individual  plants  of  types  not  here- 
tofore known  in  Connecticut  or  Florida  or  other  districts  where  this 
variety  had  been  grown,  which  possessed  certain  characters  that 
were  extremely  important  from  the  standpoint  of  cigar-wrapper 
production  and  manufacture.  The  seed  of  many  individuals  of  all 
ral  types  of  plants  growing  in  the  fields  under  shade  was  saved 
under  bags  to  protect  the  flowers  from  cross-pollination.  The  seed 
of  these  individual  plants  was  sown  in  separate  sections  of  tobacco 
.  beds  in  1904.  and  test  rows  of  about  100  plants  were  raised  in 
the  field,  a  row  of  plants  from  every  seed  plant.     In  the  season  of 


NEW    TOBACCO    VARIETIES.  389 

1904  seed  of  the  best  plants  in  the  rows  producing  the  best  tobacco 
was  saved  under  bag  for  planting  on  a  more  extensive  scale  the 
following  season.  In  these  tests  two  types  of  plants,  one  from 
Sumatra  seed  and  the  other  from  Cuban  seed,  possessing  the  qualities, 
vield,  and  other  characteristics  necessary  for  a  superior  cigar-wrapper 
variety  adapted  for  growing  under  shade  were  observed.  These 
varieties  have  been  shown  to  be  improvements  on  previous  varieties 
adapted  for  growing  under  shade,  and  seed  for  growing  them  on  a 
commercial  scale  has  been  distributed  in  the  Connecticut  Valley, 
Florida,  and  other  tobacco-growing  sections. 

In  the  following  description  of  four  new  varieties  of  cigar-wrapper 
tobacco  detailed  descriptions  and  records  of  performance  are  omitted, 
these  data  being  reserved  for  publication  in  technical  bulletins  of  the 
Department.  Short  descriptions  and  statements  of  the  value  of 
these  varieties  are  presented  with  a  view  to  calling  the  attention  of 
growers  and  breeders  not  only  to  their  value  but  to  the  importance 
of  breeding  new  varieties  for  the  tobacco  industry.  In  tests  of  these 
varieties  by  growers  it  is  advisable  that  only  a  small  area  of  any 
variety  be  grown  until  it  is  proved  by  experience  that  the  variety  is 
adapted  to  local  conditions.  It  is  also  important  that  the  growers 
save  the  seed  of  these  varieties  under  bag,  free  from  any  possibility  of 
cross-fertilization.  The  Department  can  not  undertake  to  test  the 
adaptability  of  these  varieties  in  all  of  the  different  cigar-wrapper 
sections,  so  that  it  is  necessary  for  the  grower  to  use  caution  and 
test  them  carefully  before  planting  them  extensively  on  a  commer- 
cial scale. 

TIIE    UNCLE    SAM    SUMATRA    TOBACCO. 

The  original  plants  of  this  variety  were  found  by  the  writer  growing 
in  a  crop  of  tobacco  under  cloth  shade  grown  by  Mr.  M.  L.  Floyd,  near 
Tariffville,  Conn.,  in  the  season  of  1903.  This  crop  was  raised  from 
seed  brought  to  Connecticut  from  Florida  and  which  originally  came 
from  the  island  of  Sumatra,  In  this  field  of  the  so-called  Sumatra 
variety  of  tobacco  were  found,  upon  careful  investigation,  11  very  dis- 
tinct general  types  of  tobacco  plants  which  were  strongly  enough  dif- 
ferentiated by  certain  characteristics  of  habit  of  growth,  shape  and 
size  of  leaves,  and  quality  to  be  designated  as  incipient  varieties. 
Among  these  types  was  found  one  which  most  nearly  approached  the 
ideal  of  a  cigar-wrapper  plant,  both  as  regards  development  of  plant 
and  character  of  leaves,  ami  strikingly  different  from  every  other 
type  found  in  this  field  or  in  other  fields.  This  was  designated 
as  "Type  No.  3"  for  convenience  in  the  breeding  experiments,  and 
was  so  known  until  it  was  considered  of  sufficient  importance  to  be 
named. 

The  original  field  in  which  the  first  plants  of  this  valuable  type 


390 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


were  found  consisted  of  about  4o  acres,  and  contained  a  total  of 
about  50,000  plants.  Out  of  all  of  this  number  only  28  plants  of 
the  type  known  as  No.  3  were  found.  It  might  be  said  here  that  the 
writer  in  ail  his  experience  in  studying  tobacco  plants  in  other  fields 
CTown  under  shade  in  the  Connecticut  Taller,  in  Florida,  and  i 
where,  has  never  found  a  single  plant  which  could  be  clearly  class* 
with  this  type.  On  account  of  the  few  plants  of  this  type  found  in 
the  field  and  their  very  marked  characteristics  it  was  not  considered 
likely  that  their  seed  would  come  true  to  type.  However,  on  account 
of  their  valuable  characters  the  seed  of  every  plant  was  carefully 

~ed   under    bag    and 


great  care  was  taken  to 
prevent     any     possible 
—fertilization  or  ac- 
cidental  injury.     In    a 
violent  storm  late  in  the 
-on  one  seed    head. 
borne  by  one  of  the  best 
individual   plants,    was 
broken   off    before    the 
I  had  matured  suffi- 
ciently to  admit   of  its 
being  saved,  so  that  the 
I  of  only  27  plants 
ved    for  experi- 
mental purp«  ■-•  s. 

In  the  spring  of 
the  seed  of  each  of  the 
27  plants  was  sown  sepa- 
rately in  the  seed  beds. 
and  about    100   of   the 
seedlings  of  every  par- 
ent   plant    were    trans- 
planted  into   test  r 
in  the  breeding  field  of 
Mr    J    S    Dewev    near 
Granby,  Conn.    T<  i  the  surprise  and  gratification  of  everyone  concerned 
it  was  found  in  the  breeding  field  that  the  progeny  of  every  parent 
plant  as  grown  in  the  test  rows  came  uniformly  true  to  type,  not  a  single 
plant  of  a  foreign  or  different  type  appearing  in  any  of  the  test  r 
In  the  opinion  of  the  many  t-  growers,  plant  breeders,  and  others 

who  visited  this  field  there  has  never  been  under  their  observation  so 
striking  an  example  of  the  imiformity  of  the  progeny  of  individual  par- 
ent plants  in  any  crop  propagated  by  seed.  The  habit  of  growth  of  the 
plants,  the  shape,  -  lor,  and  venation  of  the  leaves,  the  number  of 


NEW    TOBACCO    VARIETIES.  391 

sucker  branches,  the  arrangement  and  characters  of  the  seed  pods  in 
the  seed  head,  and  the  number  of  leaves  of  the  individual  plants  in 
every  progeny  row  were  remarkably  uniform  and  true  to  the  type  of 
the  parent  plants.  The  best  plants  in  thesetest  rows  were  selected  for 
seed  production  and  the  seed  was  saved  under  bag.  The  tobacco 
produced  in  the  test  rows  and  by  the  individual  seed  plants  was  har- 
vested separately  in  order  to  get  an  accurate  laboratory  test  of  the 
quality  of  the  cured  and  fermented  tobacco.  After  an  examination 
of  the  fermented  tobacco  from  the  test  rows  and  tests  made  for 
taste,  burn,  body,  color,  stretch,  economy  in  cutting  cigar  wrappers, 
and  other  qualities,  the  seed  produced  by  the  most  desirable  plants 
in  the  five  best  rows  was  reserved  for  planting  the  following  season. 
In  1905  tests  of  the  progeny  of  individual  plants  were  again  carried 
out:  seed  was  furnished  the  Bureau  of  Soils  for  a  commercial  field 
test  in  the  Connecticut  Valley  and  seed  was  sent  to  Florida  and 
elsewhere  for  field  tests.  The  results  of  these  and  other  tests 
have  proved  beyond  a  doubt  the  value  of  this  variety  for  growing 
commercially,  together  with  the  fact  that  the  seed  comes  true  to 
type  year  after  year  when  saved  under  bag. 

The  name  "Uncle  Sam  Sumatra"  was  given  to  this  variety — a 
section  of  a  field  of  which  is  shown  in  Plate  XXXIII,  figure  2 — from 
the  fact  that  it  was  found  among  plants  grown  in  the  United  States 
from  seed  which  was  brought  to  this  country  originally  from  Sumatra. 
It  is  a  cigar-wrapper  variety  of  tobacco  and  adapted  for  growing  under 
shade  in  the  cigar-wrapper  producing  regions. 

The  plants  of  the  Uncle  Sam  Sumatra  tobacco  reach  an  average 
height  of  about  8  feet  at  the  time  of  maturity.  The  plants  bear  an  aver- 
age of  about  26  leaves  before  topping.  The  leaves  are  bone  in  a 
characteristic  slightly  drooping  position,  as  c  -n  be  seen  in  the  illus- 
tration (PI.  XXXIII,  fig.  1).  The  color  of  tie  flowers  and  the  size 
and  arrangement  of  the  seed  pods  are  characteristic  of  this  variety, 
very  few  pods  being  produced  by  the  plants.  Few  and  small  suckers 
are  produced,  thus  greatly  reducing  the  labor  of  suckering  the  field 
crops.  The  plants  grow  vigorously,  are  resistant  to  unfavorable 
conditions,  and  are  of  early  maturity. 

The  leaves  are  characteristically  round  (fig.  11)  and  specially 
adapted  for  economical  cigar-wrapper  cutting.  The  cured  leaves 
will  average  about  16  inches  in  width  by  20  inches  in  length, 
although  the  size  varies  according  to  the  cultivation  and  fertilization 
of  the  soil,  the  location  of  the  field,  and  other  conditions.  The  size  and 
shape  of  the  leaves  are  very  uniform  from  the  top  to  the  base  of  the 
plants.  The  green  leaves  have  a  deep-green  color  and  the  cured 
leaves  a  beautiful  cinnamon-brown  color.  The  veins  are  small  and  fine 
and  regularly  arranged  in  the  leaves.  The  burn  is  excellent,  leaving  a 
gray,  consistent  ash,  and  the  flavor  is  neutral,  there  being  no  dis- 
agreeable taste.     On  cigars  the  tobacco  has  a  good  life  and  stretch, 


392 


YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


sufficient  body  or  strength  to  withstand  ordinary  handling  without 
injury,  a  dull  gloss  characteristic  of  the  fermented  tobacco,  and  a 
rich  appearance  desirable  in  all  high-class  cigar  wrappers. 

The  yield  of  the  crops  of  this  variety  is  high,  being  as  much  as  1,600 
pounds  of  cured  tobacco  to  the  acre  under  favorable  conditions.  The 
percentage  of  the  best  grades  of  wrapper  in  these  crops  is  correspond- 
ingly high  and  satisfactory  to  the  grower  and  manufacturer  alike. 

THE  HAZLEWOOD  CUBAN  TOBACCO. 

The  crops  of  tobacco  grown  in  the  Connecticut  Valley  under  cloth 
shade  from  imported  Cuban  seed  in  1903  were  extremely  variable 

with  respect  to  the   type  of 
plants.      This    variation    in 
type    of    the    plants    grown 
from  Cuban  seed  was  not  so 
marked  as  in  the  case  of  the 
plants  grown  from  Sumatra 
seed,    but    there    was    found 
.      in    the    Cuban    varieties    a 
I     large  proportion  of  worthless 
A    plants,  apparent  reversions  or 
I    freaks,  which  were  almost  a 
I  total    loss    to    the    growers. 
M    Five  distinct  general  types  of 
tobacco  were   found   in   the 
f     crops  of  Cuban  tobacco,  and 
340  plants  of  these  types  were 
kept  for  seed  production,  the 
seed   being  all   saved  under 
bag.      Two    of   these    types, 
^B  /  numbered  11  and  13  tempo- 

's'•  ,.-'  rarily  for  convenience  in  the 

V  -  tobacco-breeding  series,  were 

^B        ..•■'""  desirable    for    cigar-wrapper 

;/  oroduction,     the     plants     of 

which  constituted  about  one- 
no.  12-Typical  leaf  of  Hazlewood  Cuban  tobacco.        ^^  rf  ^  ^^  nmnbrf  m 

the  field  in  which  the  selections  were  made.  Type  Xo.  13  was  specially 
desirable  from  a  practical  standpoint,  the  plants  having  the  habit  of 
growth,  with  freedom  from  suckers,  and  bearing  the  character  of  leaves 
necessary  for  producing  a  profitable  yield  of  cigar  wrappers.  In  the  first 
seed  selection  of  plants  of  this  type,  32  typical  plants  were  found  after 
a  careful  examination  of  a  field  of  about  48  acres  grown  under  shade  from 
seed  imported  from  the  island  of  Cuba.  The  seed  of  these  plants,  free 
from  cross-fertilization,  was  carefully  saved  and  tested  the  following 
year  according  to  the  methods  employed  in  the  tests  already  described. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XXXIII 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,   1906. 


Plate  XXXIV. 


NEW    TOBACCO    VARIETIES.  393 

The  transmitting  power  of  the  parent  plants  of  this  type  was  found 
to  be  very  marked,  the  uniformity  of  the-plants  in  the  progeny  rows  in 
1904  being  very  remarkable.  In  1905  the  bagged  seed  from  the  best 
plants  in  the  best  rows  of  1904  was  tested  in  a  commercial  field  test  in 
the  Connecticut  Valley  by  the  Bureau  of  .Soils,  in  further  progeny 
tests,  and  in  field  tests  in  Florida  and  other  cigar- wrapper  tobacco 
icgions.  The  results  of  these  tests  were  so  satisfactory  that  it  was 
decided  to  give  this  type  a  varietal  name  and  distribute  limited 
quantities  of  seed  to  interested  tobacco  growers  for  use  in  1906. 
The  past  season's  tests  have  shown  conclusively  that  this  variety  is 
valuable  and  an  improvement  on  any  of  the  Cuban  cigar-wrapper 
tobaccos  heretofore  grown  in  the  United  States. 

This  variety  (PL  XXXIV)  was  named  the  Hazlewood  Cuban  in 
honor  of  Mr.  William  Hazlewood,  who  brought  to  the  LTnited  States 
the  original  Cuban  seed  from  which  the  variety  was  developed.  It 
is  adapted  for  growing  under  shade,  and  possibly  to  a  limited  extent 
outside,  for  cigar-wrapper  production  in  the  cigar-wrapper  tobacco 
districts. 

The  plants  of  the  Hazlewood  Cuban  variety  when  grown  under 
shade  reach  a  height  of  about  ~h  feet  at  the  time  of  maturity.  The 
leaves  have  a  partially  erect  habit  of  growth,  the  seed  production 
is  comparatively  small,  and  the  time  of  maturity  is  very  early.  The 
plants  bear  but  few  sucker  branches  (see  Pi.  XXXIV,  fig.  1 ),  differing 
in  this  very  greatly  from  the  ordinary  Cuban  varieties,  in  which  the 
tendency  to  sucker  production  is  usually  very  marked.  The  average 
number  of  leaves  borne*  by  the  individual  plants  varies  somewhat 
with  conditions,  but  is  about  21  after  topping.  The  yield  of  the 
crops  of  this  tobacco  has  been  heavy  for  Cuban  tobacco,  reaching 
under  favorable  conditions  1,400  pounds  of  cured  tobacco  to  the 
acre.  The  percentage  of  the  best  grades  of  tobacco  in  these  crops 
has  been  high. 

The  leaves  are  about  18  inches  in  length  by  about  15  inches  in 
breadth  and  are  of  a  round  shape  adapted  to  economical  cigar- 
wrapper  cutting  (fig.  12).  The  color  of  the  green  leaves  is  a  very 
deep  green,  and  of  the  cured  leaves  a  velvety  brown.  The  grain 
in  the  leaves  is  very  marked,  being  evenly  distributed  from  the  tip 
to  the  base  of  the  leaves.  The  veins  are  small  and  fine,  the  burn 
excellent,  leaving  a  white  to  gray-colored  ash,  and  the  flavor  is  very 
?ood,  no  obnoxious  taste  being  present.  The  tobacco  has  sufficient 
body  and  stretch  so  thai  when  wrapped  on  cigars  it  stands  han- 
dling without  injury.  When  the  plants  are  grown  without  shade 
the  tobacco  has  a  pleasant  aroma  and  can  be  used  for  cigar-filler 
production. 

I'll  I.  BREWEB  HYBRID  TOBACCO. 

The  Brewer  Hybrid  tobacco  is  the  result  of  a  cross  of  the  Con- 
necticut  Broadleaf  variety  with  the  Cuban  variety.     This  cross  was 


394  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

made  in  1903  in  the  Connecticut  Valley,  plants  of  the  Connecticut 

Broadleaf  variety  grown  by  Mr.  N.*S.  Brewer,  of  Hockanum,  Conn., 
being  used  for  the  mother  parents  and  plants  of  Cuban  tobacco 
grown  in  the  Connecticut  A'alley  from  freshly  imported  Cuban  seed 
being  used  for  the  male  parents. 

The  object  of  making  tins  cross  was  to  secure  a  hybrid  combining 
the  characters  of  habit  of  growth,  adaptability  to  Connecticut  Valley 
conditions,  burn,  and  other  qualities  of  the  Connecticut  Broadleaf 
variety  with  the  size  and  shape  of  leaves,  grain,  and  texture  of  the 
Cuban  tobacco.  Twenty-six  crosses  of  this  kind  were  made,  even- 
one  of  which  was 
successful,  so  that 
26  seed  pods  were 
obtained.  In  1004 
the  seed  from  all 
these  pods  was 
sown  in  separate 
compartments  of 
the  seed  bed  and 
the  plants  were 
transplanted  to 
test  rows  in  the 
experimental 
field.  The  plants 
in  6  of  the  test 
rows  showed  suffi- 
cient uniformity 
of  characters  to 
admit  of  further 
selection  and 
breeding.  The 
best  plants  of 
these  rows  were 
carefully  selected 
for  seed  produc- 
tion and  their  seed 
was  saved  under  bag.  In  one  i  >f  the  test  rows  the  progeny  of  a  parent 
plant  numbered  lc  in  the  breeding  records  was  found  a  striking  plant, 
different  from  either  parent  or  the  other  hybrid  plants,  but  clearly 
approaching  the  ideal  plant  sought  for.  This  plant  was  carefully 
tested  in  1905  and  found  to  come  true  to  seed.  The  other  progeny 
test  rows  this  season  showed  considerable  variability.  Some  of  the 
rows  were  very  much  more  uniform  than  others,  but  the  important 
row  was  the  progeny  of  the  striking  plant  1c.  The  best  plants  in  tins 
row  were  selected  for  seed  production  and  the  seed  was  saved  under 


NEW    TOBACCO    VARIETIES.  395 

bag.  In  1906  this  seed  was  tested  in  a  large  number  of  localities, 
some  of  which  were  adapted  to  the  production  of  this  type  of  tobacco 
and  others  unfavorable  to  it.  Under  favorable  conditions  the  crops 
were  uniform  and  of  desirable  yield,  and  the  tobacco  of  improved 
quality  as  compared  with  the  parent  Connecticut  Broadleaf.  While 
there  is  opportunity  for  further  improvement  of  this  variety  by  breed- 
ing and  seed  selection,  its  characteristics  are  sufficiently  marked  and 
desirable  and  the  seed  comes  so  true  to  type  that  it  can  safely  be 
tested  by  tobacco  growers  who  raise  cigar-wrapper  varieties  of  tobacco.- 

The  name  ''Brewer  Hybrid"  was  given  to  this  variety  (shown  in 
PI.  XXXY,  fig.  2)  in  honor  of  Mr.  X.  S.  Brewer,  of  Ilockanum. 
Conn.,  the  grower  of  the  parent  Connecticut  Broadleaf  variety,  who 
has  furnished  unusual  opportunities  for  experimental  work  with  this 
variety  on  his  farm.  It  is  adopted  for  growing  in  northern  cigar- 
wrapper  districts  and  for  the  production  of  cigar  wrappers. 

The  plants  of  the  Brewer  Hybrid  reach  about  5  feet  in  height  at 
the  time  of  maturity,  and  the  leaves  have  a  slightly  drooping  habit 
of  growth.  (PI.  XXXV,  fig.  1.)  The  plants  bear  about  the  same 
number  of  suckers  as  the  Connecticut  Broadleaf  variety,  although  the 
character  has  as  yet  a  tendency  to  vary  under  different  conditions. 
The  plants  mature  in  about  the  same  length  of  time  as  the  Connecti- 
cut Broadleaf  variety. 

The  leaves  of  the  Brewer  Hybrid  are  medium  in  size,  averaging 
about  22  inches  in  length  by  19  in  width.  The  shape  of  the  leaves 
is  very  round  and  especially  well  adapted  for  cigar-wrapper  cutting 
(fig.  13).  The  grain  is  evenly  distributed  from  the  tip  to  the  base  of 
the  leaves.  The  texture  resembles  that  of  Connecticut  Broadleaf 
tobacco,  but  this  tobacco  when  wrapped  on  cigars  has  a  smooth,  rich 
appearance  not  found  in  the  Connecticut  Broadleaf  variety.  The  burn 
is  good,  leaving  a  gray  ash:  there  is  no  bad  flavor,  and  the  stretch  is 
particularly  good,  so  that  the  tobacco  on  cigars  stands  handling  very 
well.  The  color  of  the  growing  leaves  is  light  green  and  of  the  cured 
leaves  a  bright  cinnamon-brown.  The  fermented  tobacco  has  the  dull 
finish  characteristic  of  Cuban  tobacco.  The  yield  of  the  crops  is  large 
under  favorable  conditions,  reaching  1,800  pounds  to  the  acre,  and  the 
production  of  high-grade  wrappers  in  the  crop  is  comparatively  high. 

THE  COOLEY  HYBRID  TOBACCO. 

The  Cooley  Hybrid  variety  of  tobacco  is  the  result  of  a  cross 
between  Connecticut  Havana  seed  as  the  mother  parent  and  Sumatra 
tobacco  as  the  male  parent.  This  cross  was  made  in  the  summer  of 
1903,  using  Connecticut  Havana  seed  plants  grown  by  Mr.  D.  P. 
Cooley,  of  Granby,  Conn.,  as  the  mother  parents  and  Sumatra  plants 
grown  under  shade  in  the  same  district  tor  the  male  parents.  The 
object  of  this  cross  was  to  secure  a  variety  adapted  to  the  conditions 


396 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


of  the  Connecticut  Valley,  having  the  habit  of  growth,  burn,  and 
other  characters  of  the  Havana  Seed  tobacco,  combined  with  the 
improved  shape  of  leaves,  venation,  and  other  characters  of  the 
Sumatra  tobacco.  Eighteen  flowers  in  carefully  selected  Havana 
Seed  plants  were  cross-fertilized  with  Sumatra  pollen,  all  of  which 
set  seed  and  were  found  to  be  successfully  cross-fertilized.  The 
resulting  seed  produced  in  the  18  seed  pods  was  tested  in  progeny 
rows  on  the  Cooley  farm  in  1904,8  of  which  were  determined  upon 
careful  examination  and  testing  to  be  promising  for  future  breed- 
ing experiments. 
In  these  S  rows  3 
plants  of  particular 
merit  were  found 
and  reserved  for  a 
special  test  in  190"), 
together  with  many 
other  plants,  all  of 
the  seed  of  which 
was  saved  under 
bag.  It  was  found 
that  the  progeny  of 
the  3  particular 
plants  saved  in 
1 904  produ  c  e  d 
strikingly  charac- 
teristic and  uniform 
types  of  tobacco  in 
1905.  (See  Plato 
XXXVI,  fig.  2.) 
The  habit  of  growth 
of  the  plants,  the 
shape  and  size  of 
the  leaves,  and  the 
quality  and  other 
characters    of    the 

Fig.  14.— Typical  leaf  of  Cooley  Hybrid  tobacco.  ,  t       i\ 

■ v  tobacco     ot     these 

progeny  rows  were  so  desirable  that  seed  was  saved  from  the  besl 
plants  in  1905  for  special  field  tests  in  1906,  as  well  as  for  continued 
breeding  experiments.  The  final  tests  have  demonstrated  that  under 
conditions  favorable  for  the  growth  of  the  plants  the  variety  is  a 
valuable  acquisition  to  the  tobacco  industry,  and  it  was  consequently 
named,  and  preparations  were  made  for  the  distribution  of  a  limited 
quantity  of  the  seed  for  commercial  planting. 

-  The  Cooley  Hybrid  plants  (PI.  XXXVI,  fig.  1)  grow  to  a  height 
of  about  6  feet,  bear  on  the  average  about  21  leaves  before  topping, 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XXXV. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906, 


Plate  XXXVI. 


NEW    TOBACCO    VARIETIES.  397 

have  few  small  suckers,  comparatively  small  seed  production,  and 
mature  about  the  same  time  as  the  Connecticut  Havana  seed  variety. 

The  leaves  (fig.  14)  are  about  22  inches  in  length  by  about  17 
inches  in  width,  having  in  the  growing  condition  a  deep-green 
color  and  after  curing  a  fine  light-brown  color.  The  venation  is  fine 
and  regularly  arranged  in  the  leaves;  the  texture  is  uniform  from 
the  tip  to  the  base  of  the  leaves;  the  burn  is  good,  leaving  a  white 
ash,  and  the  flavor  is  satisfactory,  no  sharp  or  disagreeable  taste 
being  present  in  the  fermented  wrapper.  When  the  Cooley  Hybrid 
tobacco  is  wrapped  on  cigars  it  stretches  well  and  covers  the  cigar  in 
a  satisfactory  manner. 

The  yield  of  this  variety  under  favorable  conditions  is  about  1 ,750 
pounds  of  cured  tobacco  to  the  acre.  The  yield  of  the  best  grades 
of  wrappers  is  high,  and  this  percentage  can  doubtless  be  increased 
by  continued  breeding  and  seed  selection. 

NECESSITY    OF    BREEDING    EXPERIMENTS. 

The  object  of  the  tobacco-breeding  experiments  undertaken  by 
the  Department  of  Agriculture  is  the  production  of  improved  varie- 
ties for  the  established  tobacco-growing  regions  of  the  United  States 
and  for  new  sections  of  this  country  which  are  found  to  be  adapted 
for  tobacco  culture.  The  great  increase  in  the  use  of  tobacco  for  the 
manufacture  of  cigars,  smoking  and  plug  tobaccos,  and  for  other  pur- 
poses has  resulted  in  a  demand  which  the  areas  now  under  cultivation 
adapted  for  the  production  of  this  crop  have  not  been  able  to  supply. 
This  condition  must  be  met  either  by  extending  and  increasing  the 
yield  of  the  areas  now  cultivated  in  tobacco  and  developing  new 
sections  having  the  proper  soil  and  climatic  conditions  for  its  suc- 
cessful culture  or  by  depending  upon  increased  importations  of  foreign- 
grown  varieties. 

It  is  an  established  fact  that  there  are  great  areas  in  the  United 
States  not  now  growing  tobacco  which  have  the  soil,  climatic,  and 
other  conditions  suited  for  growing  valuable  tobaccos  and  which  for 
the  welfare  of  American  agriculture  should  supply  the  demand  of  the 
manufacturers.  One  of  the  most  important  phases  of  the  develop- 
ment of  these  undeveloped  sections  is  the  production  of  varieties  of 
tobacco  adapted  to  their  soil  and  climatic  conditions.  The  experi- 
ments of  the  Department  of  Agriculture  during  the  past  four  years 
have  demonstrated  that  the  production  and  introduction  of  such 
varieties  can  best  be  effected  by  the  use  of  careful  and  systematic 
methods  of  seed  selection  and  breeding.0 

"The  writer  in  the  work  of  growing  and  testing  the  new  varieties  of  tobacco  described 
in  this  paper  has  been  materially  assisted  by  the  active  help  and  interest  of  Mr. 
W.  W.  Cobey  and  Dr.  W.  W.  darner,  of  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry,  and  of  Mr. 
.1.  B.  Stewart,  of  the  Bureau  of  Soils. 


398  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICT7LTUEE. 

In  the  old  and  established  tobacco-growing  regions  of  the  United 
States  it  is  a  matter  of  common  observation  that  the  varieties  of 
tobacco  which  have  been  cominously  cultivated  in  some  of  these  sec- 
tions have  become  more  and  more  subject  to  the  attack  of  certain 
fungous  diseases,  insects,  and  other  enemies.  The  loss  to  the  growers 
due  to  these  injuries  has  become  such  that  unless  relief  is  obtained 
the  industry  in  these  regions  must  be  abandoned.  Two  typical  illus- 
trations of  this  condition  are  found  in  the  injury  to  tobacco  plants  in 
the  Connecticut;  Valley  by  the  fungous  disease  Thielavia  \  or 

root-rot.  and  the  destruction  of  plants  in  many  fields  in  Florida  and 
Georgia  by  the  nematod?.  an  enemy  which  threatens  the  success  of 
this  important  tobacco-producing  section.  Varieties  of  tobac€o 
resistant  or  immune  to  the  attacks  of  some  of  these  enemies  have 
been  produced  in  the  course  of  the  breeding  experiments  conducted 
by  the  Department,  demonstrating  the  practicability  of  suecessfully 
combating  fungous  diseases  and  the  attacks  of  insects  through  the 
origination  of  resistant  or  immune  varieties  by  breeding  and  seed 
selection. 

The  variety  of  manufactured  tobacco  products  due  to  the  individu- 
ally different  tastes  of  consumers  has  resulted  in  the  demand  by 
manufacturers  for  particular  varieties  and  grades  of  tobacco  adapted 
for  use  in  their  specialties.  The  great  number  of  brands  of  cigars, 
smoking  mixtures,  and  plug  tobaccos  is  sufficient  evidence  of  the 
demand  for  different  kinds  of  tobacco  suited  to  the  individual  wants 
of  the  consumer.  This  demand  has  been  met  in  part  by  the  use  of 
varieties  of  tobacco  grown  in  different  sections  of  the  country,  blend- 
ing them  in  cigars  or  in  smoking  or  plug  tobaccos,  and  by  the  treat- 
ment of  the  tobacco  while  growing,  or  when  undergoing  the  curing. 
fermenting,  or  manufacturing  processes.  The  breeding  experiments 
of  the  Department  have  proved  conclusively  that  varieties  of  tobacco, 
adapted  for  particular  purposes  of  manufacture  by  reason  of  their 
quality  or  other  characteristics,  can  be  produced  by  breeding,  and 
can  be  propagated  uniformly  year  after  year  by  the  use  of  proper 
methods  of  seed  selection. 

An  illustration  of  the  practicability  and  value  of  the  breeding  of 
varieties  of  tobacco  for  special  purposes  can  be  found  in  the  varieties 
grown  in  the  Connecticut  Valley.  As  the  result  of  breeding,  the 
Havana  Seed  variety  yields  a  high  percentage  of  light-colored  cigar 
wrappers  having  a  smooth,  glossy  finish,  while  the  Broadleaf  variety 
produces  largely  medium  to  dark-colored  wrappers  with  a  rough  and 
dull  finish.  One  of  the  possibilities  in  this  very  important  phase  of 
tobacco  breeding  is  the  production  of  varieties  of  cigar-wrapper 
tobacco  yielding  uniformly  throughout  the  crop  leaves  of  particular 
size  an  I  shape  adapted  to  the  most  economical  wrapping  of  different 
sizes  of  cigars.     Numerous  other  illustrations  might  be  given  to  show 


NEW    TOBACCO    VARIETIES.  399 

the  necessity  and  importance  to  growers  and  manufacturers  alike  of 
producing  varieties  adapted  for  special  purposes  in  all  classes  of 
tobacco. 

METHODS    OF    BREEDING. 

The  methods  of  breeding  employed  by  the  writer  in  the  production 
of  new  varieties  of  tobacco  may  be  described  under  the  general  terms 
of  hybridization  and  selection.  Hybridization  has  been  used  for  the 
purpose  of  combining  in  new  varieties  the  essential  and  valuable 
characters  of  two  established  varieties  by  crossing,  winch  necessarily 
has  been  followed  by  careful  and  rigid  selection  of  the  best  individual 
hybrid  plants  for  seed  production  every  year.  The  term  "selection," 
as  used  in  these  experiments,  may  be  defined  as  the  method  of  pro- 
duction of  new  varieties  by  saving  the  seed  of  mutations  or  striking 
variations  in  the  type  of  plants  found  in  the  established  varieties 
without  artificial  cross-fertilization.  Such  mutations,  or  "sports," 
may  be  the  result  of  breaking  up  in  type  or  of  variability  resulting 
from  their  being  grown  under  new  climatic  or  soil  conditions,  methods 
of  cultivation,  accidental  cross-fertilization,  peculiarity  of  season  or 
food  supply,  or  other  cause. 

From  the  fact  that  these  breeding  experiments  were  first  under- 
taken and  results  secured  with  cigar  tobaccos,  the  methods  described 
will  be  those  used  in  the  production  of  new  varieties  of  those  tobac- 
cos; but  the  same  methods  are  being  successfully  used  and  are  appli- 
cable to  the  production  of  new  varieties  of  all  other  tobaccos. 

Hybridization. — The  success  of  hybridization  as  a  means  for  the 
improvement  of  tobaccos  depends  largely  upon  the  judgment  of  the 
breeder  in  the  selection  of  parent  varieties  and  plants  for  crossing. 
In  the  first  place,  the  crossing  of  widely  different  varieties  of  tobacco 
has  given  few,  if  any,  valuable  results.  For  instance,  the  crossing 
of  varieties  of  cigar  tobaccos  with  varieties  of  smoking  tobaccos  has 
not  produced,  so  far,  at  least,  a  single  improved  type  for  either  cigar 
or  smoking  tobacco  manufacture.  The  crossing  of  different  varieties 
of  cigar  tobaccos,  however,  has  made  it  possible  to  secure  improved 
varieties  of  this  class.  The  varieties  grown  in  this  country  may  be 
grouped  in  a  general  way  into  three  great  classes,  viz,  cigar,  smoking, 
and  plug  tobaccos.  The  experience  of  the  writer  is  that  crosses 
bet  veen  the  varieties  in  any  one  class  may  be  beneficial,  but  that 
cross  5S  between  varieties  of  different  classes  are  usually  followed  by 
failure. 

It  is  absolutely  necessary  that  tobacco  breeders  have  clearly  in 
mind  the  type  of  plant  desired  before  any  crossing  of  varieties  is 
undertaken.  Promiscuous  crossing  of  different  varieties  of  tobacco 
is  certain  to  be  unproductive  of  any  valuable  results.  The  best 
results  have  been  secured  by  using  an  established  variety  for  one 
parent  and  then  crossing  the  best  individual  plants  of  this  variety 


400  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

with  other  varieties  which  possess  the  characters  lacking  in  the  first. 
It  is  important  that  a  large  number  of  crosses  be  made  in  order  that 
the  breeder  may  have  an  opportunity  to  find  ideal  plants  for  propa- 
gation. 

In  the  Connecticut  Valley,  Broadleaf  and  Havana  Seed  are  the 
two  varieties  which  have  been  generally  grown  for  cigar-wrapper 
production.  The  plants  of  these  varieties  produce  large,  pointed 
leaves,  with  coarse  venation,  which — on  account  of  their  size,  shape, 
and  venation — can  not  be  economically  used  for  cutting  cigar  wrap- 
pers. This  tobacco,  however,  is  adapted  to  the  soil  and  climatic  con- 
ditions of  the  Connecticut  Valley,  and  has  a  good  burn,  taste,  body, 
elasticity,  and  other  valuable  characters.  The  Cuban  and  Sumatra 
varieties  of  plants  bear  comparatively  small,  round  leaves,  with  fine 
veins,  but  are  not  adapted  for  growing  under  the  same  conditions 
as  the  Connecticut  Valley  varieties.  The  crossing  of  the  Connecticut 
Broadleaf  and  Havana  Seed  varieties  with  the  Cuban  and  Sumatra 
varieties,  followed  by  a  rigid  selection  of  seed  plants  for  several  gen- 
erations, has  produced  several  valuable  and  improved  varieties  of 
tobaccos.  As  a  rule  the  best  results  have  been  secured  by  using  a 
native  or  established  variety  as  the  mother  parent  and  a  foreign- 
grown  variety  for  crossing  as  the  male  parent. 

Selection. — Selection  is  the  most  practicable  means  for  the  pro- 
duction of  new  varieties  of  tobacco  and  is  most  likely  to  yield  profit- 
able and  permanent  residts.  Many  of  the  established  varieties  may 
be  traced  to  the  selection  of  new  types  of  plants  in  tobacco  fields 
for  seed  production  by  tobacco  grower-.  A  well-known  illustration 
of  this  method  of  production  of  new  varieties  is  the  White  Burley 
variety,  originated  by  George  Webb,  of  Brown  County,  Ohio,  and 
now  grown  extensively  in  Kentucky,  Ohio,  and  other  tobacco- 
producing  States.  The  history  of  the  origin  of  this  variety  shows 
that  Mr.  Webb,  a  successful  tobacco  grower,  noticed  in  his  field  of 
Red  Burley  tobacco  a  few  plants  having  a  characteristic  light-green 
color  and  peculiar  habit  of  growth.  These  plants  were  saved  for 
seed,  and  upon  finding  that  the  cured  leaves  of  these  plants  were 
more  valuable  than  the  ordinary  Burley  tobacco  the  grower  used  the 
seed  extensively  the  following  season.  In  a  few  years  the  value  of 
this  tobacco  was  recognized  by  manufacturers  and  growers,  and  the 
variety  was  grown  on  an  extensive  scale.  It  is  now  one  of  the  most 
important  varieties  grown  m  the  United  States. 

The  change  of  seed  from  one  tobacco-growing  region  to  different 
soil  and  climatic  conditions,  particularly  from  the  South  to  the  North, 
is  likely  to  result  in  the  breaking  up  of  the  type  of  the  variety  and  the 
appearance  of  plants  with  characteristic-  very  different  from  the 
established  type.  These  new  types  of  plants  can  be  propagated  bo- 
using self-fertilized  seed,  and  uniform  varieties  of  tobacco   can   be 


NEW    TOBACCO    VARIETIES.  401 

secured  by  continued  selection  of  the  best  individual  plants  for  seed 
production.  The  use  of  Florida-grown  and  imported  Sumatra  seed  for 
growing  in  the  Connecticut  Valley  during  the  past  few  years  is  a  good 
illustration  of  the  effect  of  a  change  of  seed.  The  plants  grown  from 
tins  foreign-grown  seed  were  extremely  variable,  individual  plants  of 
new  and  unknown  types  of  tobacco  appearing  in  the  fields.  The  seeds 
of  desirable  individual  plants  of  these  types  were  saved  under  bag, 
free  from  cross-fertilization,  and  several  valuable  new  varieties  have 
been  secured  adapted  to  the  conditions  in  the  Connecticut  Valley  and 
uniformly  coining  true  to  type  year  after  3Tear. 

It  is  a  matter  of  common  observation  among  tobacco  growers  that 
an  occasional  plant  producing  the  ideal  leaves  and  other  characters 
desired  by  the  growers  and  manufacturers  is  found  in  their  fields.  A 
lack  of  appreciation  of  the  value  of  these  plants  for  breeding  purposes 
results  in  their  being  topped  and  thus  lost  for  seed  production  and  prop- 
agation. It  is  the  belief  of  the  writer  after  several  years  of  careful 
observation  along  this  line  that  if  tobacco  growers  could  be  interested 
in  carefully  studying  their  crops  from  the  time  the  plants  are  set  out 
in  the  field  until  they  are  topped,  for  the  purpose  of  finding  these  occa- 
sional plants  of  the  ideal  t}Tpe  and  saving  their  seed  under  bag,  free 
from  accidental  cross-fertilization,  for  planting  the  following  season, 
more  progress  could  be  made  in  the  production  of  improved  varie- 
ties of  tobacco  than  by  any  other  means. 

THE    TESTING    OF    NEW    VARIETIES. 

The  value  of  new  varieties  of  tobacco  must  be  established  by  care- 
ful experimental  tests  as  well  as  practical  experience  before  they  are 
introduced  for  growing  on  a  commercial  scale.  This  feature  of  the 
successful  production  of  new  varieties  is  of  special  importance  with 
this  crop,  because  the.  value  of  varieties  of  tobacco  depends  not  only 
upon  their  quality,  yield  to  the  acre,  and  economical  use  by  manufac- 
turers, but  also  upon  the  reputation  established  by  years  of  successful 
production  for  a  particular  market  requirement.  The  consumer  of 
tobacco  does  not  easily  change  from  one  kind  of  tobacco  to  another, 
after  finding  a  satisfactory  article,  and  consequently  the  manufacturer 
is  slow  in  making  any  change  in  the  variety  used  for  making  particular 
brands  of  cigars,  smoking  mixtures,  plug  tobaccos,  or  other  manufac- 
tured products.  It  is  therefore  important  that  the  breeder  make  all 
possible  tests  of  the  value  of  new  varieties  before  distributing  the  seed 
to  tobacco  growers. 

The  new  varieties  of  tobacco  produced  by  the  Department  of  Agri- 
culture are  tested  in  the  field  for  habit  of  growth  and  yield;  in  the 
laboratory  for  the  quality  of  the  cured  and  fermented  product;  and 
finally  samples  of  the  tobacco  of  these  varieties  are  subjected  to  actual 
manufacturing  tests  by  manufacturers. 
3    A1906 26 


402  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Field  tests. — The  held  tests  must  necessarily  be  conducted  in 
those  section-  and  under  those  circumstances  in  which  the  variety  is 
to  be  grown.  The  influence  of  soil  and  climatic  conditions  upon  the 
behavior  of  the  tobacco  plant  is  such  that  the  results  obtained  in  one 
section  of  the  tobacco-growing  regions  can  not  be  depended  upon  for 
other  sections  having  different  conditions. 

In  the  tests  of  cigar- wrapper  varieties  a  1-acre  field  is  considered 
large  enough  ro  secure  the  necessary  data  as  to  the  uniformity  of  the 
individual  plants  in  the  field,  yield,  and  other  characters  that  can  not 
be  determined  by  row  tests  in  the  breeding  experimental  fields.  The 
area  devoted  to  the  field  test,  however,  must  frequently  be  modified 
by  circumstances,  but  less  than  an  acre  is  likely  to  be  unsatisfactory, 
owing  to  the  fact  that  in  such  cases  not  enough  tobacco  of  any  one 
grade  can  be  secured  for  entire  bales  or  packages.  The  larger  the  area 
that  can  be  used  for  such  tests,  other  things  being  equal,  the  more  val- 
uable and  reliable  the  results  from  the  practical  standpoint. 

In  the  field  tests  of  new  varieties  of  tobacco  every  phase  of  the  cul- 
ture of  the  crop — from  the  time  the  carefully  selected  seed  is  sown  in 
the  seed  bed  until  the  tobacco  is  harvested,  cured,  and  fermented — - 
should  be  so  arranged  as  to  give  the  crop  the  most  favorable  circum- 
stances possible  for  growth.  In  all  cases,  however,  the  amount  of 
money  expended  for  any  and  all  operations  must  be  governed  by  prac- 
tical experience  of  growers  of  other  varieties  of  tobacco  in  the  same 
class  as  the  experimental  crops.  The  results  of  these  experiments,  to 
be  of  value,  must  show  the  profit  under  practical  conditions  of  field 
culture  of  the  new  varieties  compared  with  the  established  varieties: 
or,  in  sections  where  tobacco  has  not  been  grown,  the  profit  that  may 
be  expected  by  growers  under  normal  conditions.  A  record  of  the 
actual  cost  of  all  of  the  operations  in  the  production  and  handling  of 
the  crop,  the  yield,  and  the  selling  value  of  the  product  is  necessary 
in  order  to  determine  the  comparative  or  actual  value  of  the  new 
varieties. 

Laboratory  tests. — The  laboratory  tests  of  new  varieties  of  cigar 
tobaccos  include  a  study  of  the  tobacco  during  the  curing  and  fer- 
menting process  in  the  warehouse,  and  an  examination  of  the  color, 
burn,  body,  elasticity  or  stretch,  and  flavor  and  aroma  of  the  fer- 
mented leaves.  As  an  illustration  of  these  tests  the  character  of  the 
burn  of  the  Department's  new  varieties  is  tested  in  the  smoking 
machine  devised  by  Dr.  W.  W.  Gamer,0  of  Plant  Breeding  Investi- 
gations, supplemented  by  other  tests,  including  the  ordinary  tests  of 
the  tobacco  buyers.  The  elasticity  and  strength  of  the  leaves  are 
determined  by  the  aid  of  a  specially  designed,  apparatus  for  this  pur- 
pose, and  finally  representative  samples  are  made  up  into  cigars  and 

a  See  Bui.  100,  Part  IV,  of  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry,  '-Methods  of  Testing  the 
Binning  Quality  of  Cigar  Tobacco."- 


NEW    TOBACCO    VARIETIES.  403 

submitted  to  experts  for  a  test  of  the  flavor,  aroma,  and  other  char- 
acters necessary  for  a  desirable  toba< 

MAxri-AcrrinxG  tests. — The  manufacturing  tests  of  new  varh 
are  made  by  sending  representative  samples  of  the  fermented  tobacco 
to  manufacturers  for  use  in  the  products  for  which  the  varieties  are 
adapted.  The  final  test  of  the  value  of  any  tobacco  is  its  useful 
in  filling  the  demand  of  the  manufacturer:  therefore  this  test  is  of 
supreme  importance  from  the  standpoint  of  securing  reliable  infor- 
mation as  to  the  desirability  of  growing  a  variety  extensively. 
Tobacco  manufacturers  are,  as  a  rule,  anxious  to  test  new  varieties 
with  a  view  to  securing  a  more  valuable  tobacco  for  their  established 
trade  or  for  the  purpose  of  supplying  the  demand  for  other  products 
for  the  manufacture  of  which  the  established  varieties  are  not  adapted. 
It  is  a  common  practice,  therefore,  for  manufacturers,  through  their 
buyers,  to  purchase  small  crops  of  new  varieties  and  test  them  in 
comparison  with  their  regular  supply  of  tobaccos.  In  this  way  the 
tobacco  breeder  may  get  a  practical  test  of  new  varieties,  and  if  they 
prove  valuable  the  demand  of  the  manufacturer  will  encourage 
increased  production. 

THE    PRESERVATION    OF    TYPE. 

The  production  and  introduction  of  new  varieties  of  tobacco  must 
be  followed  by  continued  effort  on  the  part  of  the  growers  to  preserve 
and  improve  the  type,  in  order  that  the  fullest  and  best  results  may 
be  obtained.  Without  selection  of  seed  plants  year  after  year  by  the 
growers,  the  life  of  tobacco  varieties  is  comparatively  short.  The 
accidental  cross-fertilization  of  seed  saved  without  protection,  the 
use  of  inferior  plants  for  seed  production,  and  many  other  causes 
contribute  to  the  deterioration,  breaking  up  of  type,  and  so-called 
running  out  of  varieties.  This  fact  is  so  well  established  that  growers 
find  it  necessary  frequently  to  secure  seed  from  some  new  source  rather 
than  to  use  their  own  tobacco  seed.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  the 
profitableness  of  a  variety  depends  to  a  considerable  extent  on  the 
production  of  a  uniform  character  of  tobacco  year  after  year  for  a 
particular  purpose,  the  importance  of  preserving  the  type  of  the 
variety  can  not  be  overestimated. 

The  uniformity  of  varieties  of  tobacco  can  be  effectually  controlled 
by  protecting  the  seed  of  carefully  selected  plants  from  accidental 
cro-s-fertili/.ation  and  by  seed  separation.  The  best  individual  plants 
of  the  variety  grown  should  be  selected  for  seed  production.  The 
variability  of  the  individual  plants  in  the  field  offers  an  opportunity 
for  the  continual  improvement  of  a  variety  by  the  intelligent  selection 
of  seed  plants  baring  the  habit  of  growth  ami  bearing  the  character 
of  leaves  most  nearly  meeting  the  ideal  of  the  grower  and  the  needs  of 
the  manufacturer.     The  flowers  borne  by  these  seed  plants  can  be 


404  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

successfully  protected  from  cross-fertilization  with  the  .plants  in  the 
same  field,  or  of  other  fields  or  varieties,  by  inclosing  the  flower  heads 
of  the  selected  plants,  before  the  flowers  open,  with  alight  but  strong 
manila-paper  bag.  The  tobacco  flowers  are  perfectly  self-fertile,  and 
several  years  of  extensive  practical  experience  have  shown  that 
tobacco  seed  saved  under  bag — that  is,  self-fertilized  seed — is  equal 
if  not  superior  to  seed  cross-fertilized  within  the  variety.  These 
paper  bags  should  remain  over  the  seed  heads  until  all  of  the  flowers 
have  set  seed,  as  showm  by  the  development  of  seed  pods;  then  they 
can  be  removed  and  the  seed  allowed  to  mature  under  natural  con- 
ditions. In  northern  districts  it  lias  not  been  found  necessary  to 
remove  the  bags,  and  they  may  be  left  over  the  seed  heads  until  the 
seed  is  shelled.  In  southern  districts  it  has  not  only  been  found 
advisable  to  remove  the  paper  bags,  but  it  is  an  advantage,  before 
using  the  bags,  to  perforate  them  with  small  holes,  as  with  a  needle, 
to  admit  of  a  circulation  of  air  without  danger  of  cross  pollination. 
The  paper  bags  prevent  the  cross-pollination  of  the  flowers  under  the 
bag  by  wind,  insects,  or  other  agencies. 

The  methods  of  bagging  the  seed,  seed  separation,  and,  to  a  limited 
extent,  the  row  test,  outlined  in  this  paper  and  more  fully  described 
in  the  Yearbook  for  1904,a  have  been  extensively  adopted  by  tobacco 
growers  of  established  varieties.  The  use  of  these  methods  of  breed- 
ing as  a  means  of  preserving  the  types  of  new  varieties  of  tobacco  is 
of  very  great  importance  and  should  receive  the  attention  of  every 
grower. 

CONCLUSION. 

The  experience  of  the  writer  during  the  past  four  years  has  shown 
that  breeding  experiments  systematically  carried  out  can  be  made  of 
great  practical  importance  to  the  tobacco  industry.  It  costs  no 
more  to  grow  an  improved  variety  of  tobacco  giving  a  higher  yield 
of  a  better  quality  than  to  grow  unimproved  and  irregular  varieties. 
The  tobacco  plant  is  particularly  susceptible  of  improvement  and 
satisfactory  for  the  work  of  the  breeder  in  that  it  is  both  fully  self- 
fertile  and  easily  cross-fertilized.  The  large  number  of  seed  pro- 
duced by  single  plants,  frequently  a  half  million  or  more,  makes 
the  propagation  of  a  valuable  variety,  once  it  is  secured,  particu- 
larly easy  and  rapid.  The  active  interests  of  the  manufacturers 
in  the  production  of  improved  varieties  adapted  to  their  needs  and 
the  willingness  of  the  manufacturers  to  pay  increased  prices  for  better 
qualities  in  improved  varieties  make  tobacco  breeding  remunerative 
to  the  grower. 

aShamel,  A.  D.,  Yearbook  of  the  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  1904,  p.  435, 
"The  Improvement  of  Tobacco  by  Breeding  and  Selection." 


OPPORTUNITIES  FOR  DAIRYING. 


I.  GENERAL. 


By  Wm.  Hart  Dexter,  Ph.  D., 
Assistant  Dairyman,  in  Charge  of  Dairy  Literature  and  Extension  Work. 

DEFINITION. 

Strictly  speaking,  dairying  is  the  business  of  conducting  a  dairy 
farm.  Commonly,  however,  we  use  the  word  to  include  the  varied 
industries  which  have  to  do  directly  with  the  production  and  handling 
of  milk  and  milk  products.  The  industrial  salvation  of  this  country 
depends  ultimately  on  its  agricultural  resources.  The  profits  of 
agriculture  depend  ultimately  on  the  intelligent  cultivation  of  the 
soil.  Dairy  farming  is  increasing  in  almost  every  section  of  the 
country,  largely  because  it  is  recognized  as  one  of  the  most  economical 
forms  of  agriculture  where  the  preservation  of  soil  fertility  is  con- 
sidered. Taking  this  broad  view  of  dairying,  we  find  it  one  of  the 
greatest  wealth-producing  industries  in  the  land. 

Opportunities  for  dairying  are  found  everywhere  in  the  United 
States.  The  different  sections  of  the  country  have  characteristic 
peculiarities,  but  all  need  milk  and  its  products.  Success  awaits 
the  dainrman  who  fits  his  work  to  the  conditions  of  the  place  in 
which  he  lives.  He  should  know  the  value  of  a  good  dairy  cow  and 
how  to  treat  her.  He  should  recognize  the  necessity  of  cleanliness 
from  the  time  the  milk  leaves  the  udder  until  the  finished  product 
is  in  the  hands  of  the  consumer.  He  should  know  and  meet  the 
needs  of  his  market. 

OPPORTUNITIES    IN    VARIOUS    LINES. 

The  equipment  and  practice  found  on  the  dairy  farm  afford  great 
opportunity  for  improvement.  Better  buildings  as  to  construction 
and  sanitation  need  not  be  expensive.  The  best  machinery  and 
utensils  are  available  at  moderate  prices.  Thorough  and  cleanly 
management  in  the  stable  and  milk  room  is  simple  and  cheap.  The 
necessary  refrigeration  can  also  be  provided  without  elaborate  or 
costly  fittings.  The  indispensable  silo  can  be  erected  of  such  material 
as  may  be  best  suited  to  the  climate. 

The  maintenance  and  increase  of  soil  fertility  constitutes  one  of  the 
greatest   opportunities  for  dairying.     A  ton   of  wheat,   worth  $22, 

405 


406  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

removes  from  the  soil  $7.50  worth  of  plant  food.  A  ton  of  butter, 
worth  $500,  takes  less  than  50  cents'  worth  of  plant  food  from  the 
soil.  Land  on  the  Pacific  coast,  reduced  to  such  poverty  by  the  con- 
tinued raising  of  wheat  that  it  produced  only  8  or  9  bushels  of  wheat 
per  acre,  has  been  so  restored  by  dairying  that  it  now  produces  from 
20  to  40  bushels,  and  the  land  has  doubled  in  value. 

Careful  dairying  goes  hand  in  hand  with  the  most  helpful  rotation 
of  crops,  encouraging  especially  the  production  of  legumes.  Diver- 
sified farming  needs  dairying  for  its  best  results.  The  improvement 
of  the  forage  crops  best  suited  to  a  given  locality  is  the  natural  study 
of  the  dairyman. 

IMPROVEMENT  OF  DAIRY  CATTLE. 

The  improvement  of  dairy  cattle  offers  great  opportunity.  The 
cows  supplying  Iowa  butter  factories  are  making  an  average  of  only 
140  pounds  of  butter  per  year.  By  the  weighing  and  testing  of  the 
milk  of  each  cow  those  which  fail  to  pay  their  board  can  be  detected 
and  rejected.  The  rearing  of  the  heifer  calves  from  the  most  profit- 
able cows  is  the  simplest  course  for  the  improvement  of  the  herd  at 
least  expense.  In  this  selection  regard  must  be  had  for  dairy  type 
of  form  and  function.  A  pure-bred  daily  sire  should  be  at  the  head 
of  every  dairy  herd.  It  is  entirely  })racticable  to  add  largely  to  the 
wealth  of  every  dairy  farmer  in  this  way,  and  every  dollar  added  to 
the  average  income  from  the  dairy  cow  in  the  United  States  adds 
$20,000,000  to  the  nation's  production  of  wealth. 

To  assist  in  tins  improvement  of  the  dairy  herds  cooperative  test 
associations  have  been  organized.  They  were  introduced  ten  years 
ago  in  Denmark,  and  are  now  found  in  most  of  the  prominent  dairy 
sections  of  Europe.  In  Germany  these  associations  have  been  the 
means  during  the  last  five  years  of  increasing  the  income  of  the  dairy 
farmers  by  an  average  of  $14  per  cow  per  year.  Similar  associations 
in  a  few  States  of  our  own  country,  led  by  Michigan,  have  shown  the 
practicability  of  increasing  the  income  from  dairy  farming  at  least 
one-fourth  without  additional  expense  to  the  producer.  Coopera- 
tion in  the  organization  and  management  of  these  test  associations 
is  needed  to  promote  their  practical  and  general  efficiency. 

The  associations  of  breeders  of  j)ure-bred  dairy  cattle  have  a  simi- 
lar opportunity  to  increase  the  value  of  their  records  of  tests  of  dairy 
cows.  By  agreeing  upon  uniform  rules  under  which  these  tests 
should  be  conducted,  general  standards  of  dairy  performance  would 
be  established,  and  by  the  registration  of  all  such  records  in  a  national 
office  their  general  acceptance  and  use  would  be  secured. 

IMPROVEMENT    OF    DAIRY    PRODUCTS. 

Opportunity  for  dairying  appears  also  in  the  increased  demand  for 
pure  milk,  especially  in  the  larger  cities.     This  opportunity  is  for 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOE    DAIRYING.  407 

intelligence  and  cleanliness  in  the  production  and  for  reliable  purity 
in  the  product.  The  market-milk  producer  can  now  profit  b}r  im- 
proved methods  for  the  care,  distribution,  and  sale  of  milk  of  the  best 
quality.     There  seems  to  be  practically  no  limit  to  this  market. 

On  many  dairy  farms  near  cities  and  places  of  popular  resort  oppor- 
tunity for  profit  is  afforded  by  the  demand  for  ice  cream.  One  great 
advantage  in  supplying  cream  is  the  saving  of  the  skim  milk  for  the 
feeding  of  farm  stock  and  ultimately  for  the  fertility  of  the  soil. 

Farm  dairy  butter  of  the  highest  quality  is  always  in  demand  at 
the  highest  prices.  Uniformity  of  excellence  must  be  maintained, 
and  this  requires  patient  attention  to  details.  Success  in  this  lino 
will  follow  the  use  of  the  improved  methods  which  have  been  worked 
out  in  the  creameries,  with  such  modifications  as  may  be  required  in 
the  smaller  operations  of  the  farm.  The  new  rapid  method  for  the 
determination  of  water  in  butter  will  be  of  material  assistance. 
Taints  and  defects  must  be  promptly  discovered  and  corrected.  The 
farm  separator  must  be  kept  clean. 

The  furnishing  of  fancy  farm-made  cheese  offers  an  opportunity 
for  great  profit.  Recent  investigations  have  shown  that  it  is  entirely 
practicable  to  produce  in  this  country  the  finest  grades  of  cheese  of 
the  Camembert  and  Roquefort  types,  heretofore  only  had  by  impor- 
tation from  Europe.  Prices  for  such  goods  are  high,  and  the  farm 
dairy  can  easily  be  equipped  for  their  production. 

There  is  large  opportunity  for  profit  in  dairying  by  the  improve- 
ment and  varied  uses  of  the  by-products  from  the  manufacture  of 
butter  and  cheese,  such  as  casein,  ash,  and  milk  sugar.  While  some 
forms  of  these  by-products  require  expensive  machinery,  others  are 
entirely  within  the  reach  of  the  farm  dairy.  Under  present  condi- 
tions, however,  the  most  profitable  use  of  skim  milk  and  whey  is  as 
food  for  farm  stock  and  poultry. 

CONTROLLING    MOTIVES. 

In  fairly  estimating  the  advantages  of  dairying  one  should  con- 
sider the  opportunities  presented  for  the  legitimate  gratification  of 
the  strongest  and  best  motives  to  action.  The  best  dairyman  is  the 
one  who  is  most  effectively  controlled  by  such  motives. 

The  desire  for  profit  is  strong.  A  Connecticut  dairyman  makes  22 
per  cent  net  profit  annually  on  Ins  investment.  In  Georgia  one  acre 
and  one  dairy  cow  have  produced  in  one  year,  under  careful  manage- 
ment, a  net  cash  profit  of  $28.75  in  addition  to  $20  worth  of  manure 
contributed  to  the  fertility  of  the  soil.  The  dairyman's  income  is 
conveniently  distributed  throughout  the  year,  enabling  him  to  keep 
out  of  debt.  Supplying  home  markets  keeps  money  at  home.  There 
is  no  danger  of  overproduction  with  the  world  for  a  market. 

The  desire  for  leadership  is  strong.     It  may  be  gratified  in  the 


408  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

organization  and  management  of  dairy  enterprises.  There  is  oppor- 
tunity for  leadership  in  plans  of  cooperation  connected  with  cream- 
eries, test  associations.  State  experiment  stations,  and  the  improve- 
ment of  the  condition  of  the  rural  community. 

The  desire  for  knowledge  is  strong.  The  dairyman  has  opportuni- 
ties for  the  search  after  truth  in  scientific  investigations  concerning 
the  soil,  the  culture  of  forage  crops,  the  breeding  and  care  of  live 
stock,  the  chemistry  and  bacteriology  of  milk  products,  and  the 
principles  involved  in  the  invention  and  use  of  machinery. 

The  desire  for  pleasure  is  strong.  The  dairyman  has  opportunity 
for  pleasures  of  the  better  sort,  in  the  enjoyment  of  the  poetry  and 
beauty  of  rural  life  at  its  best.  He  may  enjoy  the  improvement  of  the 
farm  home.  Love  for  animals  finds  pleasure  in  their  daily  care. 
The  endeavor  to  supply  the  best  of  pure  food  gratifies  love  for  Ins 
fe!lo\v-men.  the  highest  of  merelv  human  moth'es. 


II.  NEW  ENGLAND. 

By  George  M.  Yn'hitakek, 
Dairy  Inspector,  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry. 

PASTURES  AND  GREEX  FORAGE. 

New  England  offers  exceptional  advantages  to  the  dairyman. 
The  leading  crop  in  the  feeding  of  cows  is  grass;  and  the  soil  and 
climate  of  New  England  are  such  that  grass  grows  readily.  The 
strong,  retentive  clay  soil  of  the  hillsides  is  excellent  grass  land, 
producing  large  crops  of  hay  with  ordinary  care.  Grass  also  grows 
naturally;  and  many  hills,  too  rough  and  rocky  for  cultivation,  will 
grow  wild  grasses  if  the  ever-encroaching  bushes  are  kept  back.  In 
these  pastures  of  low-priced  land  many  cows  and  young  stock  get 
their  summer  living  at  very  little  expense  to  the  owner.  The  crop 
of  second  importance  is  the  corn  plant,  which  is  grown  more  for  forage 
than  for  the  grain.  It  grows  well  in  almost  every  section,  and  responds 
readily  to  cultivation  and  fertilization.  It  is  frequently  fed  green 
from  the  field,  as  the  pastures  begin  to  dry,  in  order  to  keep  up  the 
flow  of  milk.  Large  amounts  are  cut  for  the  silo,  grain  and  forage 
both  going  into  the  pit.  The  geological  formation  in  many  parts  of 
New  England  is  such  that  an  abundance  of  pure  water  gushes  from 
thousands  of  mountain  springs.  There  are  likewise  excellent  oppor- 
tunities for  getting  ice  of  the  best  quality,  winch  almost  every  dairy- 
man puts  up  for  his  summer  use. 

MARKETS. 

New  England's  second  distinctive  advantage  is  m  excellent,  well- 
located  markets.     Her  surface  is  liberally  dotted  with  manufacturing 


OPPORTUNITIES   FOE    DAIRYING.  409 

towns  and  cities  where  reside  a  large  part  of  her  population.  New 
England,  with  only  one-fiftieth  of  the  area  of  the  contiguous  United 
States,  has  one-fourteenth  of  the  population.  According  to  the 
census  of  1900,  Rhode  Island  is  the  most  densely  populated  State  in 
the  Union,  having  407  persons  to  the  square  mile.  Massachusetts, 
though  forty-fourth  in  territorial  rank,  is  seventh  in  amount  of 
population  and  second  in  density  of  population  among  the  States 
and  Territories  of  contiguous  United  States.  Connecticut  ranks 
fourth  in  density  of  population,  while  New  Hampshire  and  Maine, 
though  further  down  the  list  in  this  respect,  have  a  number  of  large 
manufacturing  cities  and  towns. 

But  the  superiority  of  New  England's  markets  for  dairy  products 
is  not  told  wholly  in  statistics  of  a  large  population  located  on  a 
comparatively  small  area.  The  purchasing  ability  of  tins  popula- 
tion is  large,  as  it  is  largely  composed  of  well-to-do  merchants,  pro- 
fessional men,  and  skilled  mechanics.  Even  the  unskilled  common 
laborers  have  steady  employment  at  good  wages  and  consume  large 
amounts  of  dairy  products. 

Such  markets  mean  a  quick  demand  for  all  dairy  products.  Aside 
from  milk  and  cream,  New  England  does  not  produce  all  the  dairy 
products  she  consumes.  Hence  there  is  always  a  good  demand  for 
the  fresher  article  produced  near  by.  The  New  England  dairyman 
has  an  advantage  as  to  price.  Even  in  the  wholesale  market  New 
England  butter  is  usually  quoted  at  one  or  two  cents  above  western. 
But  many  dairymen  are  located  so  that  they  can  sell  milk,  cream, 
or  butter  in  a  near-by  market  or  direct  to  consumers,  thus  getting 
the  further  advantage  of  a  retail  price.  And  few  New  England 
dairymen  are  located  so  far  away  from  a  center  as  to  be  out  of  reach 
of  the  milk  car  to  the  city,  the  cream  gatherer  for  some  butter  factory 
or  cream-shipping  station,  or  the  cheese  factory.  The  producer  of 
milk  and  its  products  in  New  England  is  closer  to  the  consumer  than 
in  other  sections. 

Not  a  few  New  England  dairymen  are  so  favorably  located  and 
have  so  much  skill  that  they  get  an  advance  above  the  ruling  price 
for  an  article  of  extra  quality. 

DISADVANTACxES. 

The  disadvantages  of  New  England  dairying  are  a  comparatively 
sterile  soil,  cold  winters,  relatively  short  growing  seasons,  rough, 
rocky  topography,  and  high  freight  rates  on  small  shipments  for 
short  distances.  But  the  quality  of  the  market  offsets  these  to  a 
large  degree.  Thorough  cultivation  and  plenty  of  applied  plant 
food  make  the  land  under  cultivation  produce  large  crops.  Four 
tons  of  hay  per  acre  is  frequently  harvested,  though  this  is  above 
the  average,  and  6  tons  is  no  uncommon  production.  High  yields 
of  ensilage  corn  are  common. 


410  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

RELATIVE    IMPORTANCE    OF    THE    DAIRY    INDUSTRY. 

Dairying  is   the   leading   agricultural   specialty   in  New   England. 
Market  gardening  receives  much  attention  near  the  cities  and  L 
towns,  but  many  market  gardeners  keep  a  dairy  herd  to  consume  the 
refuse  from  the  truck  garden  and  to  increase  the  size  of  the  manure 
pile.     Fruit  growing  is  also  a  specialty  with  many,  but  even  in  those 

s  -  dairying  is  often  a  side  issue  of  importance.  Hence  dairying  is 
almost  universal.  All  the  leading  breeds  of  dairy  cattle  are  repre- 
sented by  pure-bred  animals  of  high  quality.  Some  of  the  famous 
pure-bred  dairy  stock  of  the  country  is  of  New  England  ownership  or 
origin.  All  of  the  leading  national  breeders"  associations  have  many 
Xew  England  members,  two  have  come  to  Xew  England  for  secreta- 
ries, while  prominent  officers  of  others  are  Xew  England  men. 

Market  milk  is  the  leading  feature  of  Xew  England  dairying.     Milk 
cars  for  Boston  every  morning  leave  northern  Xew  Hampshire,  cen- 
tral Vermont,  western  Massachusetts,  and  central  Connecticut.     Be- 
tween thirty-five  and  forty  carloads  of  milk  arrive  at  Boston  daily, 
almost  all  being  of  Xew  England  origin.     The  supply  of  milk  for  the 
smaller  cities  is  also  a  business  of  large  dimensions.     The  increasing 
use  of   cream   makes    that   product   of  second    importance.     Maine 
sends  a  carload  of  cream  to  Boston  daily,  while  large  quantities  are 
received  from  other  sections  along  with  the  regular  milk  sir. 
Much  of  this  market  cream  is  separated  by  the  farmers  either  by 
Cooley  process  or  the  centrifugal  separator,  gathered  by 
where  it  is  run  through  a  separator  for  standardizing,  and  then  shipped 
to  the  city  in  bulk. 

In  northern  Xew  England  much  butter  is  made.     All  the  butter  pro- 
duced in  Xew  England  is  consumed  while  it  is  comparatively  fresh — 
in  many  instances  while  it  is  only  a  week  or  two  old.     Cheese  pro 
tinn  is  no  longer  prominent  in  Xew  England,  although  many  fact 
still  exist  in  Maine  and  Vermont,  and  many  private  dairies  still  manu- 
facture cheese. 

Among  methods  characteristic  of  the  section  perhaps  the  use  of  the 
Cooley  creaming  system  is  the  chief.  The  Cooley  system  of  c: 
gathering  was  of  Xew  England  origin,  and  the  apparatus  has  always 
been  of  Xew  England  manufacture,  so  that  this  particular  method 
gained  such  a  strong  foothold  there  that  the  separator  has  not  yet 
supplanted  it.  although  many  separators  are  now  in  use  and  the 
number  is  yearly  increasing. 

NEEDS    OF    NEW    ENGLAND    DAIRYMEN. 

The  needs  of  Xew  England  dairymen  are  chiefly  those  common  to 
dairymen  generally:  (1)  Improvement  of  methods:  (2)  elimination 
of  cows  that  do  not  pay  their  board;  (3)  more  attention  to  the  little 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOR    DAIRYING.  411 

details  of  cleanliness;  and  (-i)  more  of  a  spirit  of  cooperation  and  less 
cutthroat  competition,  particularly  in  the  selling  of  milk. 

The  needs  of  dairying  which  seem  to  be  peculiar  to  New  England  are 
four.  The  first  is  an  appreciation  of  the  good  markets  in  this  section. 
People  generally  see  at  close  range  the  hard  work  and  perplexities  of 
their  own  business,  and  have  a  vivid  realization  of  them;  hence  it 
often  happens  that  one  is  a  poor  judge  of  the  relative  advantages  of 
his  occupation.  New  England  dairymen  are  no  exception  to  this  rule, 
and  they  lose  sight  of  the  broader  and  relative  side  of  their  business. 
More  appreciation  of  the  advantages  of  the  situation  would  lead  to 
better  utilization  of  it. 

A  second  need  of  New  England  dairying  is  more  attention  to  the 
pastures.  Here  can  be  obtained,  at  a  merely  nominal  expense,  large 
amounts  of  the  very  best  cow  feed.  Yet  it  is  the  common  testimony 
that  on  the  whole  the  pastures  of  New  England  are  retrograding;  the 
coarse  weeds,  bushes,  and  encroachment  of  the  forest  are  driving  out 
the  native  nutritive  grasses. 

The  third  need  is  more  attention  to  growing  legumes.  The  New 
England  dairyman  is  to-day  dependent  upon  the  West  for  most  of  the 
nitrogenous  element  in  his  cow  rations,  this  being  bought  in  the  by- 
products of  the  factories  which  handle  grain  either  for  grinding  or  the 
manufacture  of  "breakfast  foods,"  glucose,  and  other  articles.  If  the 
New  England  milk  producer  raised  more  clover,  peas,  and  other 
legumes,  he  would  be  more  independent ;  his  farm  would  be  more  nearly 
self-sustaining;  it  would  increase  in  fertility,  and  his  dairy  products 
would  cost  less.  Several  dairymen  have  experimented  with  alfalfa, 
which  in  some  cases  has  promised  well  for  a  few  years,  but  no  permanent 
successes  are  as  yet  reported.  The  experiment  stations  are  doing  good 
work  in  introducing  vetches,  rape,  and  soy  beans;  but  in  the  common 
old-fashioned  red  clover  farmers  have  a  convenient  and  valuable 
legume. 

The  fourth  need  is  the  doing  of  business,  in  most  cases,  on  a  larger 
scale,  making  it  possible  to  practice  some  of  the  economies  which  come 
from  wholesale  methods  of  production  and  selling.  Too  many  go  to 
market  with  such  small  amounts  of  butter  as  to  be  compelled  to 
accept  whatever  the  village  trader  may  offer. 

THE    OUTLOOK. 

As  long  as  business  s  prosperous  and  population  continues  to  con- 
centrate in  the  cities  and  towns,  requiring  them  to  reach  out  farther 
and  farther  for  supplies  of  fresh  milk,  the  market-milk  business  will 
crowd  back  the  making  of  butter  and  cheese,  especially  of  the  ordi- 
nary grades;  and  factories  for  their  manufacture  will  be  abandoned 
in  order  to  sell  milk  or  cream  to  the  city.  The  outlook,  therefore,  for 
the  market-milk  business,  as  far  as  demand  is  concerned,  is  good.     The 


412  YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

question  is  that  of  price.     The  farm-labor  situation  is  acute,  the 
cost  of  grain  feeds  is  high  and  increasing,  and  the  awakening  of  health 
authorities  to  the  importance  of  clean,  sanitary  milk  is  adding  to  the 
s    of  production.     There  seems  to  be  no  danger  of  the  overproduc- 
tion of  milk,  cream,  or  fancy  fresh  butter. 

We  may  conclude  with  the  statement  of  Prof.  W.  A.  Henry:  "The 
rn  farms,  for  inherent  beauty,  for  all  that  goes  for  home-making, 
for  possibilities  in  the  range  of  crops,  and  for  good  markets,  are  with- 
out a  rival  anvwhere  in  the  world." 


III.  THE  NORTH  CENTRAL  STATES. 

By  B.  D.  White. 

,ng  and  Management  Investigai 

RECENT    PROGRI 

Wonderful  progress  has  been  made  in  the  dairy  industry  during 
the  past  decade,  and  many  changes  have  taken  place,  especially  in 
the  North  Central  States.     Among  the  States  which  have  become 
prominent  in  dairying  recently  are  Michigan,  Indiana,  North  Dakota, 
th  Dakota.  Oklahoma,  and  Missouri.     Northern  Oklahoma  and 
souri  are  especially  adapted  to  dairyi: 
In  the  last  fifteen  years  the  States  of  Illinois,  Iowa.  Wisconsin,  and 
Minnesota  have  made  great  progress  in  dairying.     In  the  last  two 
[sands  of  farms  have  been  taken  up  and  put  under  culti- 
vation, and  hundreds  of  creameries  and  cheese  factories  have  been 
built  and  put  in  operation,  manufacturing  the  milk  or  cream  from 
hundreds  of  thousands  of  cows  into  prime  butter  or  cheese.     There 
is  yet  much  untilled  land  not  only  in  those  States  but  in  many  others 
in  the  Middle  West  waiting  to  be  converted  into  fine  farms. 

FAVORABLE    CLIMATIC    CONDITIONS. 

There  seems  to  be  a  belt  particularly  favorable  to  the  dairy  industry 
in  the  North  Central  States.  This  belt  extends  from  Ohio  west  to  the 
Missouri  River  slope  and  to  the  arid  region  east  of  the  Rocky  Moun- 
tains. Some  profitable  dairying,  however,  is  carried  on  in  all  the 
and  Southern  States,  but  thus  far  it  has  not  been  made  a 
common  adjunct  to  general  farming  as  it  has  in  the  North  and  E 

The  northern  climate  seems  to  be  conducive  to  dairying.  The 
farther  north  we  go  the  more  dairying  we  find,  until  the  pine-timbered 
region  is  reached.  Even  this  is  being  converted  very  rapidly  into 
dairy  farms.  Silage  has  come  to  be  recognized  throughout  this  sec- 
tion as  the  cheape-'  le  kind  of  roughage  in  a  succulent  and 
palatable  form.  Another  northern  condition  favorable  to  dairying 
is  the  abundance  of  fine  natural  grasses  and  the  adaptability  of  the 


OPPORTUNITIES   FOR   DAIRYING.  413 

soil  to  clover,  especially  in  the  timbered  sections  of  Wisconsin  and 
Minnesota.  The  coolness  of  the  nights  in  summer  also  makes  it  pos- 
sible to  keep  milk  and  cream  easily,  and  this  makes  the  work  of  dairy- 
ing more  agreeable.  Even  the  necessity  of  giving  stock  proper 
protection  during  the  winter  months  tends  indirectly  to  increase 
dairying,  and  especially  winter  dairying,  which  the  northern  farmers 
have  found  to  be  the  most  profitable. 

The  reasons  for  the  greater  profit  in  winter  dairying  are  not  hard 
to  find.  Higher  prices  are  paid  during  the  winter  months  for  milk 
and  cream.  Cows  freshening  in  the  fall  will,  if  properly  fed,  give  milk 
all  winter,  and  when  turned  out  to  grass  in  the  spring  will  give  prac- 
tically as  much  milk  as  when  fresh.  Farmers  have  more  time  in 
winter  to  do  the  work  required  for  dairying.  Calves  may  be  fed  on 
skim  milk  during  the  winter  months,  and  when  turned  out  to  grass 
in  the  spring  need  very  little  more  care,  and  the  skim  milk  may  then 
be  fed  to  the  spring  pigs.  Under  the  system  of  winter  dairying,  cows 
go  dry  in  July  and  August,  at  a  season  of  the  year  when  the  farmers 
have  the  most  work  to  do  and  the  least  time  to  give  to  the  care  of 
cows  and  calves. 

SOIL    CONDITIONS. 

The  soil  throughout  the  dairy  districts  of  the  Xorth  Central  States 
is  generally  good,  except  in  a  few  localities  which  are  sandy:  but  on 
account  of  the  large  number  of  cows  and  other  animals  kept,  the  fer- 
tility even  of  the  poorer  soils  is  kept  up,  and  such  crops  as  are  neces- 
sary for  the  maintenance  of  a  dairy  herd  are  raised.  In  sections 
where  a  portion  of  the  land  is  too  rolling  or  hilly  to  be  fit  for  the 
growing  of  crops  it  is  used  for  pasture,  and  only  the  lower  land  is 
used  for  tillage.  In  other  localities,  where  lakes  abound,  the  land 
near  the  shores  for  a  certain  distance  is  too  wet  for  cultivation,  but 
makes  good  pasture  and  is  used  for  that  purpose.  In  such  localities 
also  the  stock  is  well  supplied  with  water;  hence  both  the  high  land 
and  the  low  is  used  to  good  advantage  for  stock  raisins;  and  dairying. 
Throughout  the  localities  where  dairying  and  stock  raising  are  exten- 
sively carried  on  the  fertility  of  the  soil  has  not  only  been  kept  up, 
but  in  many  sections  it  has  been  largely  increased. 

'    dairy  cows. 

It  is  with  regret  that  one  must  say  that  a  large  percentage  of  cows 
throughout  the  Xorth  Central  States  are  yielding  only  a  trifle  more 
than  100  pounds  of  butter  each  per  year.  In  some  dairy  States  the 
average  yield  is  less  than  150  pounds  per  cow  per  year,  when  it  is 
possible,  under  quite  ordinary  conditions  and  with  grade  cows  of  dairy 
breeds,  to  produce  twice  that  amount.  Evidently  there  is  plenty  of 
room  for  improvement.  By  proper  selection,  care,  feeding,  and 
breeding  of  dairy  cows  the  output  of  dairy  products  can  be  doubled 


414  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AGRICULTURE. 

without  increasing  the  number  of  cows  now  in  the  country.  On 
many  farms  the  dairy  herd  could  be  made  to  produce  an  increased 
profit  simply  by  testing  all  the  cows  and  disposing  of  those  which  are 
proved  to  be  unprofitable. 

The  increase  in  the  number  of  cows  is  noteworthy.  Take  Minne- 
sota as  an  example.  The  number  of  cows  supplying  creameries 
increased  from  382,356  in  1901  to  458,466  in  1904.  Considering  the 
average  cow  worth  $30,  the  assets  of  Minnesota  dairymen  were  thus 
increased  2\  million  dollars  in  these  three  years,  besides  the  amount 
obtained  from  the  sale  of  young  stock. 

In  Iowa  the  number  of  cows  su]>plying  creameries  increased  from 
600,000  in  1905  to  650,000  in  1906. 

MILK. 

The  center  of  butter  production  has  been  gradually  moving  west- 
ward, while  market  milk  is  relatively  of  less  importance  westward 
than  in  the  East.  Eastern  cities  are  learning  the  value  of  milk  and 
milk  products  for  food.  The  agitation  by  boards  of  health  for  cleaner 
and  purer  milk  seems  to  have  stimulated  the  demand,  and  difficulty 
is  experienced  in  most  of  the  large  cities  in  obtaining  an  adequate 
supply  of  milk  and  cream  during  the  winter  season,  though  prices  are 
higher  to  the  consumer  than  in  former  years.  Condensing  factories 
are  using  large  quantities  of  milk,  which  in  its  condensed  form  is 
shipped  to  nearly  every  country  on  the  globe.  A  considerable  quan- 
tity of  milk  is  being  used  in  the  manufacture  of  fancy  brands  of  cheese. 

It  has  been  estimated  that  skim  milk  is  worth  from  15  to  25  cents 
per  hundred  pounds  for  feeding  purposes  on  the  farm.  It  is  difficult 
to  estimate  the  total  feeding  and  fertilizing  value  of  skim  milk  to  the 
farmer.  Without  it  less  stock  will  be  raised  on  the  average  farm. 
With  less  stock  there  will  be  less  manure,  and  the  fertility  of  the  soil 
will  decrease  year  by  year  until  the  land  has  reached  such  a  stage  of 
poverty  that  it  will  no  longer  produce  profitable  crops.  Farmers 
should  receive  at  least  25  cents  per  hundred  pounds  for  skim  milk 
sold  from  the  farm.  Even  where  that  price  is  received,  the  average 
farmer  does  not  invest  an  equal  amount,  as  he  should,  in  commercial 
fertilizers.  When  more  stock  is  kept  and  the  skim  milk  fed  to  it,  the 
fertility  taken  by  the  crops  is  replaced  and  the  land  kept  in  proper 
condition.  The  farmer  of  the  North  Central  States  is  learning  this 
lesson.  The  price  obtained  for  milk  in  these  States  is  not  as  high  as 
in  the  East,  but  the  net  profit  seems  to  favor  the  western  farmer,  as 
he  is  able  to  produce  milk  more  cheaply  on  account  of  the  abundance 
of  feed  which  can  be  raised  on  his  fertile  soil. 

BUTTER. 

Western  methods  followed  in  the  manufacture  of  butter  are  worthy 
of  note.     The  system  of  delivering  fresh  sweet  milk  daily  to  the  butter 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOR    DAIRYING.  415 

factory,  which  was  the  common  practice  after  the  discontinuance  of 
the  gathered-cream  system,  has  been  largely  changed.  The  farmers 
have  bought  separators,  and  they  now  skim  the  milk  at  home,  feed 
the  fresh  warm  skim  milk  to  the  stock,  and  deliver  only  the  cream  to 
the  factory.  This  is  the  ideal  system  from  the  farmer's  standpoint, 
but  new  obstacles  have  appeared  which  tend  to  lower  the  quality  of 
the  butter  made.  The  farmers  do  not  deliver  the  cream  as  often  as 
they  should,  because  many  butter  factories  will  accept  cream  which 
is  no  longer  sweet. 

Many  factories  also  solicit  cream  shipments  from  farmers,  either 
direct  to  central  plants  or  to  receiving  stations  at  points  on  railroads, 
from  which  it  is  forwarded  to  the  central  or  churning  plants,  in  some 
cases  hundreds  of  miles  from  the  source  of  supply.  At  these  stations 
or  central  plants  cream  is  received  in  any  condition,  without  regard 
to  age  or  quality.  On  account  of  the  poor  quality  of  butter  made 
from  such  cream  and  the  cost  of  transportation,  the  price  to  the 
farmer  has  been  during  the  past  season  about  4  cents  per  pound 
less  for  butter  fat  than  is  paid  at  the  creameries  where  the  cream  or 
milk  is  delivered  sweet,  so  that  it  can  be  made  into  a  first-class  article 
of  butter.  A  loss  of  4  cents  per  pound  for  all  the  butter  fat  delivered 
to  creameries  for  butter-making  purposes  in  six  of  the  largest  dairy 
States  would  mean  a  loss  of  about  13  million  dollars  per  year,  or  a  loss 
of  about  3}  million  dollars  in  such  a  State  as  Iowa,  Minnesota,  or 
Wisconsin. 

The  manufacture  of  butter  seems  to  be  increasing  rapidly,  especially 
in  the  sections  where  the  cooperative  system  prevails — in  Wisconsin, 
northern  Iowa,  and  Minnesota.  The  creameries  in  Wisconsin,  as 
reported  by  the  State  authorities  in  1900,  made  60,000,000  pounds  of 
butter,  and  in  1905,  $8,500,000  pounds.  The  increased  creamery 
production  has  not  decreased  the  amount  of  butter  made  upon  the 
farms,  which,  according  to  reports,  in  1900  was  25,000,000  pounds, 
and  in  1905.  34.500,000  pounds. 

In  Iowa  the  product  of  butter  has  increased  from  77.000,000  pounds 
in  1900  to  91,000,000  pounds,  which  sold  for  more  than  820,000,000, 
in  1905. 

Minnesota  shows  an  increase  from  44,000,000  pounds  in  1900  to 
77.000,000  pounds  in  1905.  In  other  States  proportional  increases 
have  probably  been  made. 

There  has  been  increase  during  the  last  year  in  nearly  every  particu- 
lar. The  number  of  smaller  centralizing  plants  has  increased,  as  have 
the  number  of  the  dairy  farmers  and  the  size  of  their  herds.  The  per 
capita  product  of  the  cows  has  increased  and  with  it  the  demand  for 
cattle  of  the  dairy  breeds. 

From  the  increased  production  we  are  led  to  ask  the  question: 
What  effect  does  the  increased  production  have  upon  the  price  ?     The 


416  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

census  reports  give  the  total  number  of  pounds  of  creamery  butter 
made  in  the  United  States  in  1899  as  420,126,546.  The  amount  of 
butter  of  all  grades  exported  for  five  fiscal  years  ending  with  1900  was 
114,923,530  pounds,  at  an  average  price  of  15|  cents  per  pound.  The 
amount  of  creamery  butter  made  in  1904  was  531,478,141  pounds,  and 
the  amount  exported  for  the  five  years  ending  with  1905  was  only 
68,931,172  pounds,  at  an  average  price  of  17^  cents  per  pound.  The 
average  price  of  extra  creamery  butter  as  quoted  in  New  York  for 
the  five  years  ending  with  1900  was  20.3  cents  per  pound,  and  for  the 
next  five  A^ears  22.24  cents  per  pound,  which  indicates  that  the  de- 
mand for  butter  at  home  has  increased  at  a  greater  rate  than  the 
production,  causing  an  advance  in  the  price.  At  the  present  time 
a  large  proportion  of  the  extra  creamery  butter  sells  at  a  premium  of 
1J  to  2  cents  per  pound  above  the  quoted  prices. 

From  present  indications  it  would  appear  that  the  outlook  for  the 
dairy  industry,  especially  the  production  of  butter,  in  the  North 
Central  States  is  bright.  The  increased  demand  for  milk  and  cream 
for  direct  consumption,  with  the  increase  in  population,  will  have  a 
great  influence  on  the  consumption  of  butter  at  home.  Another 
hopeful  sign  is  the  probability  of  increasing  exports  to  Cuba,  which 
has  been  largely  supplied  by  Denmark,  and  to  European  countries 
which  have  been  largely  depending  upon  other  nations  for  their  supply 
of  butter. 

The  butter  exported  from  the  United  States  has  heretofore  been 
principally  of  an  inferior  quality.  The  demand  at  home  has  taken  all 
of  the  better  grades  at  good  prices.  It  is  only  natural  to  expect  that 
a  large  percentage  of  the  butter  made  in  this  country  will  hereafter 
come  from  the  North  Central  and  Southern  States  and  that  there  will 
be  an  increasing  demand  for  the  best  grades. 

CHEESE. 

Throughout  the  Xorth  Central  States  there  has  been  a  steady 
increase  during  the  last  five  years  in  the  production  of  cheese,  as  well 
as  butter,  but  the  amount  of  cheese  made  is  less  than  the  amount  of 
butter,  except  in  Wisconsin,  where  more  cheese  is  made.  In  1900, 
78,000,000  pounds,  and  in  1904,  109,000,000  pounds  were  made  in  fac- 
tories in  that  State.  The  percentage  of  increase  in  other  States  has 
in  some  cases  been  as  large  as  that  of  Wisconsin,  which  is  the  largest 
cheese-making  State  among  the  North  Central  States. 

Recent  investigations  have  led  to  the  use  of  improved  methods  in 
the  manufacture  of  cheese.  Many  of  the  causes  for  the  poor  quality 
of  the  cheese  previously  manufactured  have  been  learned  and  cor- 
rected. By  the  cold  curing  and  ripening  of  cheese  a  more  uniform 
article  is  produced,  and  it  is  commanding  an  increased  price  as  con- 
sumption and  demand  increase. 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOR   DAIRYING.  417 

In  some  of  the  North  Central  States  which  have  not  yet  undertaken 
the  manufacture  of  cheese  there  are  excellent  opportunities  for  profit- 
able production  to  supply  the  increasing  local  demand.  In  localities 
where  there  is  not  enough  milk  for  the  profitable  supply  of  a  butter 
factory  a  cheese  factory  could  be  operated  with  success.  It  appears 
to  require  about  400  cows  to  produce  the  milk  for  a  successful  butter 
factory,  whereas  cheese  can  be  made  with  profit  from  the  milk  of  200 
cows. 

The  cheese  factory  can  usually  afford  to  pay  more  for  the  milk  than 
can  the  butter  factory ;  and  for  the  last  year  cheese  making  has  been 
more  profitable  for  the  dairy  farmer  in  the  North  Central  States  than 
has  the  manufacture  of  butter. 

The  success  of  the  Wisconsin  cheese  factories  has  been  largely  due 
to  the  fine  quality  of  cheese  made,  which  finds  a  ready  market  in  the 
West  and  South.  The  demand  for  cheese,  as  for  butter,  depends 
chiefly  upon  the  quality.  Quality  should  be  the  watchword  of  every 
farmer  who  produces  the  milk,  as  well  as  of  the  manufacturer  of  the 
cheese. 

Another  important  element  in  the  outlook  for  the  cheese  industry  is 
the  evidently  increasing  appreciation  of  the  food  value  of  cheese. 
Americans  have  been  slow  to  learn  that  cheese  is  one  of  the  most 
economical,  wholesome,  and  digestible  of  our  concentrated  foodstuffs. 


IV.  THE  SOUTH. 

By  B.  H.  Raml. 
Expert  in  Dairying,  in  Charge  of  Southern  Dairy  Investigations. 

REVIEW    OF    THE    INDUSTRY,    BY    STATES. 

A  survey  of  dairy  conditions  in  the  South,  extending  during  the 
last  year  to  103  towns  in  10  States,  affords  the  material  for  this 
sketch. 

South  Carolina. — In  South  Carolina  the  dairy  industry  is,  on  the 
whole,  developed  to  a  very  limited  extent,  although  the  northern  sec- 
tion of  the  State  is  especially  suited  to  this  industry.  The  dairies 
of  this  section  are,  in  the  main,  using  very  inferior  stock,  their  build- 
ings and  equipment  are  frequently  very  inadequate,  and  they  have 
no  system  of  marketing  their  product.  In  several  places,  however, 
the  dairies  were  found  to  be  profitable,  the  animals  in  good  health, 
and  such  dairy  farms  are  distinguished  from  others  of  the  commu- 
nity by  their  generally  improved  condition.  With  but  two  excep- 
tions, none  of  the  dairy  farmers  were  using  silage,  and  only  a  few  of 
them  are  feeding  liberally  enough  on  green  feed.  That  part  of  the 
State,  with  its  especially  fine  climate,  good  lands,  and  abundance  of 
3   a1906- — -27 


418  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPABTMEXT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

cool  water,  will,  with  a  proper  development,  eventually  become  a 
dairy  section.  The  southern  portion  of  South  Carolina  is  usually  low 
and  in  many  parts  very  productive.  Forage  crops  can  be  grown  in 
great  variety  and  cheaply,  but  the  dairymen  are  for  the  most  part 
confined  to  the  towns  and  cilies  and  rely  principally  upon  commercial 
foodstuffs.     The  re,  as  a  rule,  inferior  to  those  in  the  northern 

part  of  the  State  and.  while  there  is  an  abundant  water  supply,  fre- 
quently artesian,  the  temperature  is  on  an  average  much  higher  than 
in  the  northern  portion  of  the  St  The  principal  menace  to  the 

industry  in  the  southern  part  of  this  State  may  be  said  to  be  the 
existence  of  the  cattle  tick. 

Georgia. — In  Georgia  the  conditions  vary  from  the  mountainous 
counties  of  the  northern  part  of  the  State  to  the  flat,  level  counties 
of  the  coast.     In  the  northern  counties  there  is  an  abundance  of 
land  that  is  not  utilized,  with  natural  pastures,  an  abundance  of  cool 
r,  having  in  many  cases  a  temperature  of  54c  or  55~  F. 
>n  is  above  the  Texas  fever  quarantine  line,  the  cKm 
and  it  is  well  suited  to  the  production  of  butter  and  cheese.     In  the 
.^ern  part  of  the  State  there  is  vers*  little  dairying,  except  for  the 
purpose  of   supplying  milk  to  the  cities.     Silag  g      -rally  in 

use.  and  the  city  dairymen  as  a  rule  rely  largely  on  i  Bed  meal 

and  hulls  fur  feeding:  yet  they  are  often  prosper     s. 

Florida. — In  Florida  little  attention  is  given  to  dairying,  and  the 
dairies  in  the  vicinity  of  the  places  visited — Lake  City  and  Jackson- 
ville— are  engaged  in  supplying  to  the  towns  milk  at  a  high  price 
and  of  a  rather  inferior  quality.  Inferior  scrub  cattle  are  generally 
in  use,  and  no  special  provision  is  made  for  economical  production  of 
I  i  _e  crops  for  feeding.  Owing  to  the  attention  which  is  usually 
given  to  the  production  of  fruit  and  vegetables,  and  to  the  large 
amount  of  swamp  lands,  the  outlook  for  dairying  is  limited,  t< 
the  1 

Alabama. — The  northern  portion  of  Alabama  is  very  similar  to 
the  northern  portion  of  .  being  mountainous,  well  supplied 

with  an  abundance  of  cool  water,  thickly  populated,  and  having 
numerous  towns  and  a  great  variety  of  industries.  Dairy  products 
command  a  very  high  price  and  the  conditions  are  excellent  for 
dairying.  In  the  vicinity  of  Birmingham  one  dairyman  visited  by 
the  writer  found  his  dairy  very  profitable:  in  the  same  vicinity,  how- 
ever, under  exactly  the  same  conditions,  others  were  found  to  be  very 
one  exception,  no  silos  were  found  in  use  in 
that  section  of  the  State,  and  the  buildings  and  stock  were  inferior. 
puthern  portion  of  ti  Stal  -  is  the  case  in  the  southern 
portion  of  Georgia,  the  milk  production  is  confined  principally  to 
supplying  tl.  There  are  a  few  dairymen  in  middle  Alabama 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOR    DAIRYING.  419 

that  are  making  good  profits,  and  have  been  in  the  business  for  a 
number  of  years,  but,  on  the  whole,  the  dairy  industry  of  this  section 
is  uncertain.  Feed  can  be  raised  very  cheaply,  however,  and  dairy- 
ing should  be  made  profitable. 

Louisiana. — In  Louisiana  the  principal  interest  in  dairying  is  foimd 
in  the  vicinity  of  New  Orleans,  the  greater  portion  of  the  State  being 
devoted  largely  to  the  production  of  cotton,  com,  sugar  cane,  and 
rice.  In  the  small  towns  near  New  Orleans,  however,  a  considerable 
dairy  industry  is  found.  The  cattle  in  that  section  usually  run  on 
the  coast,  where  a  variety  of  grazing  is  found  almost  the  entire  year. 
New  Orleans  offers  a  practically  unlimited  demand  for  dairy  products. 
The  cattle  used  are  frequently  very  inferior,  and  while,  especially 
at  Hammond,  the  dairy  industry  is  much  more  advanced  than  it  is 
in  any  other  place  in  the  coast  section,  many  improvements  are 
needed.  The  dairymen  need  silos,  they  need  to  improve  their  herds, 
they  need  to  produce  more  feed  on  their  farms,  and  to  abandon  the 
excessive  use  of  cotton-seed  hulls.  Several  successful  dairies  in  this 
vicinity  indicate  that,  in  spite  of  the  disadvantages,  the  possibilities 
for  the  skillful  dairyman  in  this  section  are  eneourasrino;. 

Mississippi. — In  Mississippi  the  pine  "lands  of  the  southern  part 
show  little  agricultural  development.  In  recent  years  the  removal  of 
the  timber  from  the  lands  has  left  what  are  known  as  the  stump  lands, 
which  are  very  cheap.  The  soil  is  light  and  rather  sand}-,  but  pro- 
ductive when  improved;  and  the  development  of  a  dainr  industry 
in  that  section  which  is  near  Xew  Orleans  would  be  profitable.  Fertil- 
izers are  needed,  which  dairying  would  supply.  In  the  central  part 
of  the  State  there  are  few  dairymen  of  the  better  class,  although 
there  is  a  large  production  of  hay,  this  section  being  favorable  to  the 
production  of  all  kinds  of  forage  crops.  In  the  northern  part  of  the 
State,  in  the  vicinity  of  Memphis,  Tenn.,  there  are  a  number  of  dairies 
shipping  milk  to  that  city.  The  conditions  there  are  somewhat 
similar  to  the  conditions  in  the  vicinity  of  Xew  Orleans,  except  that 
the  country  is  probably  not  quite  so  low.  Some  dairymen  are  mak- 
ing money,  but  many  of  them  are  not.  There  are  very  few  silos  in 
use,  and  the  dairy  buildings  are  usually  inferior.  The  conditions  in 
the  State  of  Mississippi  warrant  the  development  of  a  good  dairy 
industry. 

Texas. — In  Texas  there  is  a  small  creamery  industry  in  some  sec- 
tions. In  many  cases,  however,  the  promoters  of  the  creameries 
seem  to  have  misled  the  farmers,  who,  having  been  disappointed  in 
their  venture,  are  not  now  very  optimistic  about  the  dairy  industry. 
The  conditions  that  exist  in  Texas  are  very  similar  to  those  of  Mis- 
sissippi, and  the  dairy  industry  at  present  is  in  its  infancy.  There 
are  some  excellent  herds  of  pure-bred  dairy  cattle  near  Marshall,  San 
Antonio,  Dallas,  Fort  Worth,  El  Paso,  Houston,  and  other  towns, 


420  YEARBOOK    OF    THE   DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

from  which  the  equipment  and  practice  of  the  dairy  farms  in  these 
localities  are  gradually  being  improved.  The  opportunities  for  dairy- 
ing in  Texas  are  almost  unlimited. 

Arkansas. — In  Arkansas  many  different  conditions  exist.  In  the 
northern  part  of  the  State  magnificent  pastures  are  seen  and  an 
abundance  of  cool  water,  with  an  excellent  climate  for  all  seasons; 
but  there  is  very  little  dairying  there,  notwithstanding  these  favor- 
able conditions.  In  the  southern  part  of  the  State  we  find  level 
lands  but  a  more  limited  supply  of  water,  and  much  attention  is 
given  to  the  production  of  sugar  cane.  Between  Little  Rock  and 
Memphis,  however,  there  are  a  number  of  small  towns  that  produce 
a  considerable  amount  of  milk  and  cream.  The  section  of  Arkansas, 
however,  that  offers  the  best  opportunities  for  the  dairy  industry  is 
the  northern  portion  of  the  State,  and  there  are  few  sections  where 
better  natural  advantages  may  be  had. 

Tennessee. — Tennessee  may  probably  be  called  the  dairy  State 
of  the  South.  It  is  above  the  cotton  belt,  and  also  above  the  Texas 
fever  quarantine  line.  Mountainous  conditions  prevail  in  the  eastern 
part  of  the  State,  and  here  the  dairy  industry  is  well  developed  in 
the  valleys.  In  the  Sweetwater  Valley  are  found  in  use  many  silos, 
and  many  good  herds,  including  some  pure-bred  stock  of  a  high  class. 
The  central  part  of  the  State,  with  its  natural  bluegrass  pastures  and 
supply  of  pure  water,  is  already  the  home  of  many  herds  of  pure-bred 
dairy  cattle,  and  produces  market  milk  and  butter  of  the  highest 
grades.  There  is  no  State  in  the  South  in  which  the  dairy  industry 
is  as  highly  developed  as  in  Tennessee,  and  the  outlook  here  is  very 
favorable. 

North  Carolina. — In  the  western  portion  of  North  Carolina  the 
conditions  are  very  similar  to  those  of  eastern  Tennessee,  although 
on  the  whole  the  dairy  industry  is  not  as  well  developed  as  in  Tennes- 
see, and  in  many  cases  very  inferior  dairies  are  found,  both  in  equip- 
ment and  methods  and  in  the  kind  of  stock  kept.  In  the  eastern 
section  of  North  Carolina  the  conditions  are  more  like  those  in  the 
coast  sections  of  South  Carolina  and  Georgia. 

THE    SOUTH    AS    A    WHOLE. 

In  reference  to  the  conditions  that  exist  in  the  South  as  a  whole, 
attention  should  be  called  to  the  following  facts:  In  some  cases 
herds  are  found  producing  as  good  results  as  are  ordinarily  made  in 
any  section  of  America.  At  other  places  dairy  products  are  made 
as  cheaply  as  in  any  of  the  dairy  sections.  Altogether  there  is  an 
enormous  demand  in  the  South  for  dairy  products;  almost  all  of 
the  butter  and  cheese  is  imported,  some  cream  is  shipped  in  from 
States  a  great  distance  away,  and  a  great  deal  of  condensed  milk  is 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOR    DAIRYING.  421 

used  as  a  substitute  for  milk  because  of  the  scarcity  and  the  poor 
quality  of  the  fresh  milk  put  on  the  market.  Silage  is  used  to  a  very 
limited  extent,  but  in  a  number  of  the  different  sections,  on  the  coast 
of  Florida  especially,  the  silage  is  of  good  quality.  Probably  the 
greatest  reduction  in  profits  is  usually  caused  by  the  use  of  inferior 
cattle,  which  are  found  in  a  large  majority  of  the  dairies  throughout 
the  entire  South. 

On  the  cotton  farm  cotton  is  usually  the  all-absorbing  crop,  and 
little  attention  is  given  to  feed  crops.  In  many  cases  no  more  animals 
are  kept  upon  the  farm  than  are  actually  necessary  to  cultivate  the 
cotton  crop,  and  often  there  is  not  enough  feed  raised  to  supply  even 
these.  This  system  is  of  course  exactly  the  reverse  of  dairy  farming, 
in  which  the  feed  crops  are  converted  into  more  easily  marketable  and 
more  profitable  products,  and  practically  all  the  fertilizing  ingredients 
of  the  feed  (the  manure)  are  returned  to  the  soil,  which  continues  to 
increase  in  productiveness. 

The  labor  is  often  irresponsible  and  this  discourages  many  from 
going  into  dairying,  even  though  the}*  appreciate  its  advantages. 
The  warm  summers  and  the  disorganized  condition  of  the  dairy  mar- 
kets have  also  been  discouraging.  However,  with  the  use  of  artificial 
ice,  which  is  cheap,  improved  transportation  facilities,  and  the  mild 
winters,  the  thinking  man  is  about  convinced  that  the  seasons  are  not 
unfavorable  to  the  dairy  industry. 

The  demand  for  dairy  products  in  the  South  has  become  enormous, 
and  inasmuch  as  the  markets  have  not  usually  been  supplied  with 
fresh  products,  the  trade  does  not  demand  absolutely  first-class  arti- 
cles, although  the  prices  are  comparatively  very  high. 

"With  the  highly  improved  southern  farms,  the  question  of  cheap 
feed  is  settled,  for  there  is  probably  no  section  of  America  that  can  pro- 
duce cheaper  feed.  Especially  is  the  great  variety  of  legumes  that 
thrive  in  the  South  worthy  of  notice,  and  these  crops,  with  cotton- 
seed meal,  settle  the  question  of  protein. 

While  very  little  attention  has  been  given  to  the  development  of  the 
southern  pastures,  it  is  demonstrated  on  farms  throughout  the  South 
that  an  unexcelled  pasture  can  be  maintained  for  at  least  eight  months 
in  the  year. 

The  old  southern  plantation  with  its  haphazard  system  is  being 
gradually  transformed  into  a  well-organized  and  diversified  farm,  and 
in  the  transformation  dairying  promises  to  be  one  of  the  most  potent 
factors.  It  will  occupy  a  portion  of  the  cotton  farms,  and  even  if  it  is 
conducted  in  such  a  way  that  the  dairy  itself  is  not  profitable,  it  will 
make  the  farm  fertile  and  therefore  profitable  in  other  lines. 

While  the  southern  dairyman  therefore  will  have  some  difficulties 
•  that  are  not  found  in  the  northern  sections  of  the  country,  he  also  has 
many  advantages  over  the  northern  dairyman  in  the  milder  climate, 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DBPABTMSHT    OF   AGKICUIjTUKB. 

cheaper  cost  of  buildings,  the  greater  variety  of  forage  crops,  and  good 
markets.  The  South  will  always  he  a  great  cotton  country,  but  it  will 
some  day  be  also  a  great  dairy  country. 


T.  THE  PACIFIC    COAST. 

By  E.  A.  McDoxald. 

Dairy  Inspector.  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry. 

TUBAL    ADV..  DAEBYi: 

section  of  the  United  States  offers  greater  returns  to  the  intelli- 
dairyman  than  the   Si       -  on  the  Pacific  coast.     Owing  to  the 
numerous  streams  which  have  their  origin  in  the  snow-clad  peak 
the  I  ^nge,  the  Cascade  Range,  and  the  Sierra  Nevada  Range, 

there  is  a  never-failing  supply  of  fresh,  pure  water.  In  this  equable 
climate  young  stock  and  beef  cattle  can  run  out  the  year  round,  while 
dairy  cows  require  to  be  stabled  only  from  two  to  four  months,  accord- 
ing to  the  locality.  The  soil  on  the  western  slope  of  the  I  ^nge 
incl  nsive  alluvial  deposits,  and  that  on  the  east  side  is  com- 
posed largely  of  volcanic  ash.  Owing  to  the  productiveness  of  these 
:ed  that  twice  as  many  cows  can  be  fed  on  these  lands  as 
can  be  fed  on  the  same  amount  of  land  in  the  East .  These  advan* 
have  not  been  fully  appreciated.  The  early  pioneers  made  their 
money  so  easily,  growing  from  40  to  50  bushels  of  wheat  to  the  acre 
and  from  80  to  120  bushels  of  oats,  that  they  did  not  give  thought  to 
the  fact  that  their  land  would  some  day  become  impoverished.  The 
time  has  come  when  these  farmers  must  recognize  the  value  of  diver- 
sified farming.  During  the  last  five  years  there  has  been  a  strong 
movement  toward  more  intensive  farming  and  a  system  of  crop  rota- 
tion which  will  restore  and  preserve  the  fertility  of  the  sofl.  The  dairy 
cow  has  been  called  upon  to  perform  a  leading  part  in  this  wor 
has  in  other  parts  of  the  country. 

TRY    LXI 

The  following  table  shows  the  manufacture  of  creamery  butter  and 
factory  cheese  in  the  years  1897  and  1904  on  the  Pacific  coast.  Re- 
turns of  farm-made  products  are  not  complete. 

Manufacture  of  crtemery  butter  and  factory  cheese  on  the  Pacific  coast,  1897  and  1904. 

l;-:r.  Cfceeae. 


:  *  -. 

■    " 

;  -i  ■- 

7  :  . " . ;' . 

7  :--  ■- : 

7  '.-•*  ..' 

7  tmmdt 

- 

"  722 

":>:-  :-•  4 

"-'..     •;. 

2,565.000  ! 

5,080,599  I 

2,235,592 

::.-..   ■.-.-. 

■    ' 

.' 

:.•:.::    r: 

*,r "3;; ."  j-    - 

Oregon .  

CafifonB* 

Total 15,536,108^      3&,6*>,«6  -        7,608,989  j 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOR    DAIRYING.  493 

The  grade  of  cows  on  the  coast  lias  been  verv  greatly  improved 
during  the  last  ten  years.  Many  of  the  prominent  dairymen  have 
been  securing  pedigreed  pure-bred  stock:  others  are  simpl.v  using 
pure-bred  bulls  to  head  their  herds  and  breeding  up  from  their  best 
grade  cows,  so  that  the  average  herd  shows  good  dairy  characteristics. 
Here  and  there  are  found  pure-bred  herds  of  Jerseys,  Holsteins,  and 
Guernseys,  and  there  are  a  few  Ayrshires.  The  yield  per  cow  has 
been  gradually  increasing.  Many  farmers  weigh  and  test  the  milk 
of  each  cow,  and  in  this  way  discover  the  profitable  cows,  bo  that 
there  is  a  general  weeding  out  of  the  poorest  cows  of  the  herd.  In 
every  valley  on  the  coast  maybe  found  mixed  herds,  which  have  been 
bred  up  in  this  manner,  and  which  are  now  lar^e  producers. 

MOVEMENTS    OF    DAIRY    PRODUCTS. 

Butter  and  cheese  manufactured  in  Washington  is  mostly  consumed 
m  the  home  markets,  a  small  amount  being  shipped  to  Alaska.  But- 
ter and  cheese  manufactured  in  Oregon  is  only  partly  consumed  in 
the  home  markets,  the  surplus  dairy  products  being  shipped  to  San 
Francisco  and  to  the  cities  on  Puget  Sound.  California,  after  supply- 
ing her  own  markets,  ships  her  surplus  to  Alaska  and  foreign  ports 
and,  during  the  first  three  months  of  the  year,  California  is'shipping 
more  and  more  each  year  to  the  Eastern  States.  Washington  is  the 
only  State  on  the  coast  which  still  handles  a  large  amount  of  eastern 
butter.  One  reason  for  the  demand  for  eastern  products  in  Wash- 
ington is  her  trade  with  Alaska.  Being  nearest  to  Alaska  and  having 
more  regular  means  of  transportation,  she  naturally  secures  a  laro-e 
percentage  of  that  trade. 

The  possibility  of  increasing  our  trade  with  foreign  countries 
depends  on  our  ability  to  produce  as  cheaply  and  to'"  deliver  the 
product  in  as  good  condition  as  do  other  countries.  When  the  coast 
States  have  a  surplus,  South  American  countries  and  the  Orient  seem 
to  be  the  natural  outlet.  There  is  a  large  demand  throughout  the 
Orient  for  tinned  butter  and  condensed  milk  and  cream  and  for 
cheese.  The  markets  at  present  are  largely  supplied  by  Australia. 
Holland,  Germany,  and  France,  with  a  few  shipments  from  Sweden. 
Price  does  not  seem  to  be  so  important  a  factor  as  quality,  and  espe- 
cially uniformity.  San  Francisco  has  been  making  an  effort  to  secure 
this  trade  with  fair  success,  using  a  vacuum  1-pound  tin.  A  Port- 
land firm  has  also  shipped  some  tinned  butter  to  the  Orient  with 
varying  success. 

DAIRYING    IX    WASHIXGTOX. 

The  State  of  Washington  may  be  divided  into  four  sections,  differing 

from  each  other  in  rainfall,  temperature,  and  agricultural  products! 

The  first  division  is  the  west  side,  or  the  section  west  of  the  Cascade 


424  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AGBICr/LTVRE. 

Mountains,  for  the  most  part  heavily  timbered  and  characterized  by 
a  rainfall  varying  in  different  parts  from  30  to  over  100  inches, 
according  to  direction  and  distance  from  the  mountain  ranges.  As 
in  all  other  parts  of  the  Pacific  slope,  by  far  the  largest  part  of  the 
rainfall  is  confined  to  the  winter  months,  the  summer  months  being 
comparatively  free  from  rain.  This  section  includes  the  fertile  valleys 
along  the  numerous  rivers  and  creeks,  the  tide  lands,  and  the  fresh 
and  salt  water  deltas.  The  soil  is  rich  in  alluvial  deposits.  The 
climate  is  ideal  for  the  dairy  industry.  The  water  supply  consists 
of  beautiful  streams  from  the  mountain  sides  which  flow  through 
these  valleys.  On  account  of  the  mild  winters  and  proximity  to  the 
market  centers,  the  west  side  is  eminently  adapted  to  dairying. 

The  upland  prairies  of  eastern  Washington  constitute  the  second 
section  of  the  State.  These  prairies  lie  east  of  the  Columbia  River, 
extending  to  the  mountains  of  Idaho  and  from  the  Blue  Mountains 
on  the  south  to  the  mountains  of  Stevens  and  Okanogan  counties  on 
the  north.  The  Palouse  and  Big  Bend  prairies,  which  have  a  world- 
wide reputation  for  their  immense  yields  of  wheat,  are  included  in 
this  section.  Except  where  land  is  far  removed  from  the  mountains 
dairying  is  profitable.  The  rainfall  is  sufficient,  as  the  soil  is  a 
retentive  clay  loam.  Since  the  coming  of  the  hand  separator  there 
has  been  a  gradual  increase  in  dairy  products.  There  is  a  tendency 
to  diversified  farming,  making  dairying  an  adjunct  to  the  growing  of 
whe 

The  third  section  includes  the  Walla  Walla.  Yakima,  and  Wenat- 
chee  valleys  of  central  and  southern  Washington.  These  lands  are 
all  in  the  drier  parts  of  the  State,  and  their  low  altitude  gives  them 
warmer  summers  than  are  found  elsewhere  in  the  State.  These  are 
_  brush  lands,  and  when  irrigated  are  very  productive. 
This  is  a  great  fruit  and  dairy  section.  Alfalfa  is  the  principal 
forage  crop,  and  yields  under  proper  cultivation  from  5  to  7  tons 
to  the  acre,  making  this  section  particularly  adapted  to  the  dairy 
industry. 

The  farming  areas  of  the  fourth  section  are  scattered  widely.  They 
are  situated  east  of  the  Cascade  Range,  and  are  at  a  higher  altitude 
than  the  land  in  the  third  section.  The  Kittitas.  Colville.  and 
Kalispel  valleys  are  included  in  this  section.  Timothy,  clover,  root 
crops,  and  all  the  cereals  are  grown.  The  tendency  of  the  farmers  in 
this  section  is  to  diversified  farming,  with  dairying  as  the  leading 
branch.  The  Kittitas  Valley  will  lead  all  the  others  in  the  amount 
of  butter  produced. 

The  valleys  of  the  State  are  so  productive  that,  everything  else 
being  equal,  butter  and  cheese  can  be  produced  at  a  less  cost  here 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOR    DAIRYING.  425 

than  in  the  Middle  West  or  the  Eastern  States.  Rich,  succulent  food, 
pure  water,  and  a  temperate  climate  are  the  essentials  in  the  manu- 
facture of  a  "nutty,"  high-flavored,  sweet  butter.  Nature  has  been 
lavish  in  her  gifts  to  the  State  of  Washington  in  this  respect,  and  we 
may  look  forward  to  this  State  becoming  a  large  producer  of  butter. 
There  is  also  every  reason  to  believe  that  the  State  will  become  noted 
for  a  high  grade  of  butter  which  will  command  the  highest  price. 
Owing  to  the  diversified  industries  of  the  State — consisting  of  fish, 
lumber,  coal,  and  other  minerals,  the  development  of  which  will 
employ  a  large  number  of  men — the  rapid  growth  of  her  cities,  the 
development  of  Alaska,  and  the  growth  of  trade  with  the  Orient, 
South  America,  and  the  islands  of  the  Pacific,  the  State  can  always 
count  on  the  demand  for  dairy  products  being  greater  than  the  supply. 

DAIRYING    IN    OREGON. 

The  State  of  Oregon  is  in  the  same  latitude  as  South  Dakota  and 
the  New  England  States,  but  the  Japan  Current  equalizes  the  tem- 
perature and  gives  Oregon  an  ideal  climate.  All  kinds  of  forage 
crops  are  grown  without  irrigation,  except  in  a  very  small  area  in 
southeastern  Oregon.     The  State  has  five  natural  dairy  divisions. 

The  coast  section  lies  between  the  Coast  Range  and  the  Pacific 
Ocean.  The  northern  part  of  this  section  has  become  famous  for 
its  salmon.  The  annual  value  of  the  salmon  industry  is  approximately 
$3,000,000.  The  profits  in  this  industry  have  been  so  large  that  very 
little  attention  has  been  given  to  dairying,  which  is  still  in  its  infancy. 
Tillamook  County  is  the  great  cheese  section  of  the  Pacific  coast. 
It  is  an  ideal  dairy  section.  Six  different  streams  traverse  this  county, 
taking  their  rise  in  the  Coast  Range  and  emptying  into  the  Pacific 
Ocean,  so  that  this  valley  has  an  abundance  of  pure  fresh  water. 

'fhe  Willamette  Valley  includes  the  counties  on  either  side  of  the 
Willamette  River,  lying  between  the  Cascade  and  Coast  Range  of 
mountains,  a  distance  of  about  100  miles.  If  the  natural  resources 
of  this  valley  had  been  properly  utilized  they  would  have  made  it 
a  greater  butter  producer  than  any  other  section  on  the  Pacific 
coast;  but  the  soil  became  so  impoverished  by  continuous  crop- 
ping with  wheat  that  where  40  bushels  were  once  produced  13 
bushels  per  acre  is  now  an  average  crop.  How  shall  we  redeem  the 
land?  There  is  but  one  reply:  By  the  use  of  the  dairy  cow.  This 
valley  can  be  made  to  produce  butter  to  supply  ten  times  the  popu- 
lation of  the  State.  New  blood,  dairy  literature,  and  farmers' 
institutes  are  the  leaven  which  is  changing  the  "mossback"  into  an 
intelligent  dahwman.  Here  and  there  may  be  seen  pure-bred  herds 
of  Jerseys,  Holstein-Friesians,  and  Ayrshires. 


426  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Southwestern  Oregon  has  the  most  desirable  climate  in  the  State, 
having  neither  excessive  rainfall  nor  excessive  heat.  Two  beautiful 
rivers — the  Umpqua  and  Rogue— and  their  tributaries  traverse 
this  section,  which  has  already  become  famous  for  its  apples.  On 
the  higher  lands  the  dairy  industry  will  flourish,  and  alfalfa  will 
be  the  principal  forage  crop.  The  manufacture  of  butter  has  been 
increasing  very  rapidly.  Almost  every  farmer  has  the  foundation 
for  a  daiiy  herd.  Creameries  with  modern  equipments  are  in  opera- 
tion in  several  places. 

Northeastern  Oregon  constitutes  the  fourth  section.  Wheat  and 
beef  cattle  are  the  principal  agricultural  products,  and  dairying  is 
still  to  be  introduced. 

The  fifth  section  is  the  undeveloped  part  of  Oregon.  It  lies  to  the 
southeast.  One  can  travel  through  this  section  only  by  stage  or 
private  conveyance.  Here  are  thousands  of  acres  of  rich,  alluvial 
loam  and  volcanic  ash,  capable  of  being  irrigated.  It  is  certain  that 
this  section,  which  a  few  years  ago  grew  only  sagebrush  and  whose 
principal  inhabitants  were  the  jack  rabbit  and  the  coyote,  is  des- 
tined to  become  the  home  of  thousands  of  prosperous  dairymen. 

Portland,  the  metropolis  of  Oregon,  located  near  the  confluence  of 
two  great  rivers— the  Columbia  and  the  Willamette — is  the  only  city 
of  any  commercial  importance  in  the  State.  This  city  must  find 
ways  and  means  of  disposing  of  the  vast  resources  of  Oregon  and  of 
providing  the  implements  of  production  for  the  development  of  this 
great  State. 

DAIRYING    IX    CALIFORNIA. 

California  has  a  soil  and  climate  so  varied  that  all  fruits,  both 
deciduous  and  citrus,  can  be  grown  to  perfection.  All  kinds  of  cereals 
are  grown  with  success.  California  has  also  great  possibilities  as  a 
dairy  State. 

The  counties  surrounding  the  bay  of  San  Francisco  comprise  the 
best  developed  dairy  district  of  California.  It  is  from  these  counties 
that  California  is  receiving  one-third  of  its  butter  and  San  Francisco 
all  of  its  milk.  The  production  of  butter  in  these  counties  is  already 
up  to  the  limit,  as  the  city  of  San  Francisco  and  the  contiguous  cities 
draw  their  milk  supply  from  these  counties,  so  that  California  will 
have  to  look  to  some  other  section  of  the  State  for  her  future  supply 
of  butter. 

The  second  section  is  an  ideal  section  for  the  production  of  milk 
and  for  converting  it  into  butter  and  cheese.  This  section  includes 
all  the  counties  north  of  the  bay  counties  to  the  Oregon  line, 
between  the  Coast  Range  and  the  Pacific  Ocean.  The  soil  is  very 
rich  and  almost  all  of  it   is  productive.     The  natural  grasses   are 


OPPORTUNITIES    FOR   DAIRYING.  427 

clover  and  rye  grass.  The  size  of  the  average  herd  of  dairy  cows  is 
20,  and  the  produce  averages  about  200  pounds  of  butter  per  cow. 
This  section  has  been  the  greatest  butter  producer  in  California,  but 
the  production  has  apparently  reached  the  limit. 

In  the  third  section,  including  the  counties  south  of  the  bay  coun- 
ties, extending  along  the  coast  to  the  Mexican  line,  we  find  varied 
conditions.  With  irrigation  and  proper  management  the  section 
about  San  Luis  Obispo  should  become  a  large  butter  producer,  as 
it  is  better  adapted  to  the  dairy  industry  than  to  any  other  branch 
of  agriculture.  The  butter  from  this  valley  is  shipped  to  Los  Ange- 
les and  San  Francisco.  Los  Angeles  County  is  credited  with  the 
manufacture  of  over  2,000,000  pounds  of  butter  per  year,  which 
would  indicate  that  this  county  is  especially  adapted  to  the  dairy 
industry.  This,  however,  is  not  the  case,  for,  while  there  are  some 
good  dairy  herds  in  this  country,  a  large  proportion  of  the  cream 
comes  from  outside  the  county.  The  country  along  the  coast  from 
Los  Angeles  to  San  Diego  enjoys  an  equable  climate  well  suited  to 
fruit  growing  with  irrigation,  but  the  small  rainfall  will  always  hin- 
der this  section  from  becoming  great  in  dairying.  The  hope  of 
southern  California  is  in  what  is  known  as  the  Imperial  Valley.  This 
valley  contains  500,000  acres  of  very  rich  land,  which  is  being  irri- 
gated from  the  Colorado  River.  When  irrigated,  this  land  will  grow 
large  crops  of  alfalfa.  There  are  two  drawbacks  to  this  section,  the 
heat  and  the  flies.  Dairying  will  undoubtedly  be  carried  on  to  a 
considerable  extent,  but  the  difficulty  of  securing  labor  will  be  a  seri- 
ous disadvantage.  This  valley  will  probably  become  a  great  live- 
stock section. 

The  fourth  section  includes  the  San  Joaquin  Valley.  To  this  sec- 
tion and  the  Sacramento  Valley.  California  must  look  for  the  great 
increase  in  dairy  products.  A  large  portion  of  the  San  Joaquin  Valley 
is  irrigated  by  means  of  artesian  and  pumping  wells,  assisted  by  irriga- 
tion ditches  which  draw  their  supply  from  the  rivers  near  their  sources 
in  the  Sierra  Range.  The  conditions  of  soil  and  climate  are  ideal  for 
the  growth  of  alfalfa.  Grass  starts  with  the  fust  fall  of  rain  and  con- 
tinues through  the  winter,  so  that  there  is  green  grass  throughout 
the  year-.  Xear  Stockton  is  one  of  the  largest  and  best  of  pure-bred 
dairy  herds.  Nature  has  provided  all  the  conditions  for  an  ideal 
home  for  dairy  cattle  and  the  owners  are  utilizing  these  conditions  in 
the  most  practical  manner.  The  barns  are  strictly  modern,  well  ven- 
tilated, and  with  every  convenience  for  the  comfort  of  the  cows. 

We  now  pass  to  the  fifth  section,  the  Sacramento  Valley.  This 
entire  section  has  been  noted  for  its  immense  yields  of  wheat  and  bar- 
ley, but  continuous  cropping  with  wheat  has  impoverished  the  soil 


428  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

so  that  where  30  bushels  were  once  grown  now  from  8  to  10  bushels 
is  all  the  land  will  produce.  The  dairy  cow  will  be  called  upon  to 
reclaim  these  impoverished  lands,  with  the  aid  of  irrigation,  and 
they  will  be  made  to  blossom  with  the  alfalfa  flower.  The  surface 
of  this  wonderful  valley  has  only  been  scratched.  One  can  not  esti- 
mate the  possibilities  of  the  increase  in  the  dairy  industry.  The 
scarcity  of  labor  is  a  great  hindrance  to  the  development  of  this  valley. 
If  California  could  secure  labor  at  a  reasonable  wage,  the  State  could 
easily  triple  its  production. 

CONCLUSION. 

Sufficient  data  have  been  given  to  show  that  the  Pacific  coast 
States  will  become  large  producers  of  dairy  products.  Owing  to  the 
unparalleled  growth  of  the  cities  and  the  varied  industries,  it  may 
be  that  the  supply  will  not  increase  more  rapidly  than  the  demand, 
but  a  reasonable  conclusion  to  be  drawn  is  that  there  will  be  a  sur- 
plus within  a  few  years.  The  markets  of  China  and  Japan,  the  coun- 
tries of  South  America,  and  the  islands  of  the  Pacific  Ocean  are  the 
natural  outlets,  and  everything  should  be  done  to  secure  these  mar- 
kets for  the  dairymen  of  the  Pacific  coast. 


LIME-SULPHUR  WASHES   FOR  THE  SAN  JOSE  SCALE. 

By  A.  L.  Quaintaxce. 
In  Charge  of  Deciduous-fruit  Insect  Investigations,  Bureau  of  Entomology. 

ORIGIN    AXD    EARLY    USE. 

The  lime-sulphur-salt  or  so-called  California  wash  has  been  for 
many  years  the  principal  treatment  for  the  San  Jose  scale  (Aspidiotus 
perniciosus  Comst.)  in  orchards  in  California  and  elsewhere  on  the 
Pacific  slope,  and  within  the  last  five  or  six  years  it  has  become  prac- 
tically the  standard  treatment  for  this  insect  in  the  East.  Originally 
developed  as  a  dip  for  the  control  of  scab  on  sheep,  it  was  first  used 
as  an  insecticide  on  fruit  trees,  according  to  Quayle,0  in  1886  by  a 
Mr.  F.  Dusey,  of  Fresno,  Cal.,  who  experimented  with  a  sheep  dip 
prepared  by  Mr.  A.  T.  Covell.  The  wash  proved  very  efficient,  and 
with  modifications  came  quickly  into  favor.  Lime-sulphur  prepa- 
rations, either  dry  or  in  the  form  of  washes,  have  long  been  more  or 
less  used  by  orchardists  in  the  control  of  insects  and  fungi,  but  these 
preparations  are  not  comparable  to  the  boiled  lime-sulphur-salt  wash, 
and  practically  the  usefulness  of  the  latter  as  a  scalecide  was  an  inde- 
pendent discovery.  Since  first  used  on  fruit  trees  the  wash  has  been 
variously  modified  in  formula,  and  it  has  been  shown  to  have  a  con- 
siderable range  of  usefulness,  both  as  an  insecticide  and  as  a  fungicide. 

HISTORY    OF    USE    IX    THE    EAST. 

Upon  the  discovery  of  the  San  Jose  scale  in  eastern  nurseries  and 
orchards,  attention  was  naturally  drawn  to  the  treatments  which  had 
been  found  so  effective  on  the  Pacific  coast.  In  the  fall  of  1894 
Messrs.  C.  L.  Marlatt  and  D.  W.  Coquillett,6  of  the  Bureau  of  Ento- 
mology, carried  out  an  extensive  test  of  washes  in  a  scale-infested 
orchard  in  Maryland,  among  which  were  the  lime-sulphur-salt  wash, 
as  used  in  California,  and  the  Oregon  wash,  both  being  used  at  ordinary 
strength  and  at  double  strength.  Examination  of  the  treated  trees 
about  a  month  after  applications  had  been  made  indicated  that  these 
washes  had  been  fatal  to  only  a  very  small  percentage  of  the  scales, 
and  these  conditions  had  not  changed  by  late  April  of  the  following 

a  Bui.  166,  Cal.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  (1905). 

b Bui.  3,  n.  s.,  Div.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  pp.  56,  71  (1896). 

429 


430  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

spring,  when  further  observations  were  prevented  by  the  application 
of  a  soap  treatment  to  ihe  orchard  under  experiment,  and  there  was 
thus  no  opportunity  to  observe  the  later  action  of  the  wash.  The 
negative  results  from  these  tests,  attributed  to  the  heavy  rainfall  in 
the  East  as  compared  with  the  drier  climate  of  California,  discouraged 
further  experiment  on  the  part  of  entomologists,  and  no  further  tests 
in  the  Eas:  appear  to  have  been  made  until  the  spring  of  1900.  when 
the  lime-sulphur-salt  wash  was  again  tested  by  Mr.  Maiiatt,a  he  having 
in  the  meantime  assured  himself  by  personal  investigation  of  its 
effectiveness  in  California,  a  matter  which  his  earlier  experiments  had 
somewhat  led  him  to  doubt.  These  experiments  in  1900,  by  the 
Bureau  of  Entomology,  gave  excellent  results,  attributed  in  part  by 
Mr.  Marian  to  the  favorable  weather  conditions  following  applications, 
and  really  marked  the  beginning  of  the  series  of  extensive  experiments 
with  this  wash  by  various  State  and  experiment  station  entoi: 
and  others  in  the  East. 

During  the  fall  of  1901  the  wash  was  adopted  by  Dr.  S.  A.  Fori  - 
in  his  scale  control  work  in  Illinois,  as  a  result  of  an  investigation  of 
its  effectiveness  in  California  and  Oregon,  in  which  latter  State  the 
rainfall  is  quite  as  heavy  as  in  the  East.  Definite  experiments  were 
planned  by  Doctor  Forbes  in  the  spring  of  1902.  and  carried  out  by  Mr. 
E.  S.  G.  Titus,  at  that  time  his  assistant.  Also,  in  the  fall  of  1901 
experiments  with  the  wash  were  inaugurated  by  Prof.  F.  M.  Webster 
in  Ohio c  when  entomologist  of  the  Ohio  agricultural  experiment 
station,  and  carried  out  by  Messrs.  A.  F.  Burgess  and  Wilmon  Newell. 
In  the  spring  of  1902  experiments  were  begun  in  Connecticut  by  Dr. 
YV.  E.  Britton/  in  Georgia  by  Mr.  W.  M.  Scott/  by  the  writer' 
in  Maryland,  and  possibly  by  others.  The  general  results  of  these 
tests,  made  in  widely  separated  localities  and  under  different  climatic 
conditions,  pointed  strongly  to  the  probable  effectiveness  of  this 
in  destroying  the  scale  even  in  a  climate  of  heavy  rainfall,  as  in  the 
East.     During  the  year  or  so  foDowing  the  entom  f  many 

of  the  Eastern  States,  confronted  with  the  scale  problem.  1 
experiments  with  the  wash  under  their  respective  conditions, 
the  favorable  results  from  these  and  previous  tests  led  to  its  speedy 
adoption  by  many  orchardists  in  preference  to  the  mineral  oils  and 
soap  washes  previously  largely  used.  Its  adoption  was  the  more 
rapid  for  the  reason  that  the  mineral  oils,  on  the  whole,  had  proved 
unsatisfactory  on  account  of  frequent  injury  to  the  trees. 

a  Annual  Report  of  the  Entomologist,  Annual  Reports,  I".  S.  Dept.  Agr..  p.  31 

(1900);  Bui.  30.  n.  a.,  Div.  Ent...  I".  S.  Dept.  Agr..  p.  34  .1901  |. 
bfiui.  71.  111.  Act.  Exp.  Station  (1902). 
'Bui.  37.  n.  b.,  Div.  Em..  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr..  p.  33  (19  - 

d  Bui.  40.  n.  s.,  Div.  Ent..  V.  S.  Dept.  Agr..  p.     - 

e  Bui.  37.  n.  a.,  Div.  Ent..  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr..  p.  4S  I  1902.. 

/Bui.  37.  n.  s..  Div.  Ent..  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  p.  37.  and  Bui.  40,  p.  36. 


LIME-SULPHUR    WASHES    FOR    SAX    JOSE    SCALE.  431 

It  is  of  interest  in  this  connection  to  note  that,  following  the  recom- 
mendations of  an  agricultural  journal,  the  wash  had  heen  used  in  the 
control  of  the  scale  in  the  spring  of  1901  by  Mr.  X.  P.  Oreeley/'  of  Bur- 
lington, X.  J.,  who  successfully  treated  a  14-acre  peach  orchard;  by 
Mr.  C.  E.  Hathaway.6  of  Somerset,  Mass.;  and  by  Mr.  S.  S.  Stouffer, 
of  Sharpshurg.  Md.,  who  treated  several  thousand  peach  and  apple 
trees,  and  had  constructed  an  excellent  steam  cooking  plant.  An 
examination  of  this  last  orchard  by  the  writer  during  the  summer 
of  1001  proved  to  him  that  most  satisfactory  results  had  been  obtained. 

At  the  present  time  the  general  effectiveness  of  the  wash,  when 
properly  made  and  applied,  in  controlling  the  scale  under  eastern 
conditions  may  be  considered  as  established.  It  is  especially  satis- 
factory on  the  peach,  plum,  and  pear,  and  mainly  so  on  the  apple, 
although  some  orchardists  have  not  secured  satisfactory  results  in 
controlling  the  scale  on  apple.  It  is  held  by  some  that  the  dense 
pubescence  which  more  or  less  covers  the  terminals  of  apple  twigs  of 
many  varieties  prevents  the  thorough  treatment  of  these  parts,  with 
the  result  that  the  "lice"  from  females  which  have  thus  escaped  treat- 
ment are  forced  to  migrate  to  the  young  fruit,  where  they  settle  and 
breed,  so  that  at  picking  time  apples  from  sprayed  trees  are  often 
badly  marked  with  the  scale.  The  unsatisfactory  results  which 
have  at  times  been  reported  as  following  the  treatment  of  large  trees, 
owing  especially  to  infestation  of  the  fruit,  are  due  partly  to  the  condi- 
tions above  mentioned,  but  more  especially  to  lack  of  thorough  appli- 
cations, as  such  work  offers  serious  practical  difficulties. 

INGREDIENTS    OF    THE    WASH. 

As  the  name  indicates,  the  wash  is  made  of  lime,  sulphur,  and  salt 
with  water;  the  salt,  however,  is  often  omitted.  These  are  boiled 
together  for  a  sufficient  length  of  time,  during  which  boiling  chemical 
action  between  the  lime  and  sulphur  takes  place,  producing  in  solution 
the  insecticidal  properties  of  the  wash. 


As  generally  understood,  the  word  "  lime  "  refers  to  burned  or  quick- 
lime, known  chemically  as  calcium  oxid  (CaO),  and  it  is  this  form 
that  is  used  in  the  preparation  of  the  wash.  The  limestone,  or  car- 
bonate of  lime,  from  which  lime  is  obtained  varies  greatly  in  purity, 
thus  affecting  the  purity  of  the  resulting  quicklime,  which  in  addi- 
tion may  be  more  or  less  contaminated  with  the  ashes  from  the  fuel 
used  in  burning  it.  An  important  impurity  of  limestone  is  magnesia 
(MgO),  existing  as  magnesium  carbonate,  and  replacing  the  lime  (CaO) 

a  Farm  Journal,  Vol.  XXVI.  p.  24  (1902). 
b  Farm  Journal,  Vol.  XXVI.  p.  03  (1902). 


432 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


up  to  21 .7  per  cent .  when  the  rock  is  said  to  be  a  dolomite.  Magnesian 
and  dolomitic  limestones  are  those  in  winch  magnesia  occurs  in  smaller 
proportions  than  just  indicated.  Mechanically  mixed  with  limestone 
may  be  varying  amounts  of  impurities,  such  as  sand,  clayey  and  car- 
bonaceous matter,  oxids  of  iron,  etc..  giving  rise  to  different  kinds  of 
limestone,  depending  upon  the  proportion  of  the  respective  substances 
present. 

In  the  following  table  are  given  analyses  of  several  samples  of  lime, 
all  from  the  State  of  Maryland,  indicating  the  variations  in  the  compo- 
sition of  lime  to  be  found  in  a  single  State,  though  it  should  be  remem- 
bered that  Maryland  is  unusually  rich  in  limestone: 

Analyses  of  lime    CaO    from  Maryland  limestones.0 
[Prof.  H.  J.  Patterson  and  Dr.  n.  B.  McDonelh  analysts.] 


Mary- 
land 
labo- 
ratory. 


Description  of  sample. 


Insolu- 

able 
matter. 


Iron  and 
alumi- 
num 
oxids. 


Lime 


Magnesia 


Undeter- 
mined.* 


Total. 


1043 
1044 
1732 
1790 


Woodsboro  lime 

Cavetown  lime 

Wrigbtsville  lime 

G  roves  lime 

Howard  County  lime 

Oyster  shell  lime,  fresh  burned. . 


P(T  Cent. 

Percent. 

Per  cent. 

1. 85 

3.10 

91.10 

2.75 

4.83 

73.90 

.15 

1.50 

07.44 

25.00 

2.40 

47.10 

6.02 

1130 

75.40 

5.79 

2.71 

Per  cent. 

0.92 
17.94 
30.91 
25.16 

2.00 


Per  cent. 

3.03 

.58 


.34 
3.28 
5.92 


Per  cent. 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.49 


a  Bui.  61,  Md.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta. 


I  Mostly  water  and  carbonic  acid  gas. 


According  to  composition,  limes  have  been  classified  by  Gillmore  as: 

(1)  Good  or  fat  limes,  containing  as  a  rule  less  than  10  per  cent 
of  impurities. 

(2)  Poor  or  meager  limes,  containing  from  10  to  2.5  per  cent  of 
sand  or  other  impurities. 

(3)  Hydraulic  limes,  with  from  30  to  35  per  cent  of  various 
impurities. 

(4)  Hydraulic  cements. 

The  so-called  fat  limes  slake  readily  with  water,  forming  a  creamy 
mixture,  whereas  the  poor  or  meager  limes,  containing  considerable 
magnesia,  slake  more  slowly,  forming  a  poor  mixture.  Hydraulic 
limes  and  cements  need  not  be  here  considered.  In  the  preparation 
of  lime-sulphur  washes  the  fat  limes  containing  less  than  10  per  cent 
of  impurities  should  be  used,  giving  a  better  wash  and  one  more  free 
from  sand  and  grit,  which  rapidly  wears  out  the  valves  of  the  pump 
and  the  caps  on  the  nozzles.  With  formulas  containing  an  excess 
of  lime  there  is  little  danger  of  an  insufficient  amount,  even  though 
impure  lime  be  used,  but  in  a  formula  where  equal  quantities  of  lime 
and  sulphur  are  used,  in  case  of  very  impure  lime  the  quantity  of 
this  ingredient  may  be  insufficient  to  unite  chemically  with  the 
sulphur. 


LIME-SULPHUR    WASHES    FOR    SAX    JOSE    SCALE.  43$: 


Sulphur  may  be  regarded  as  the  important  ingredient  of  the  wash,. 
as  the  compounds  formed  by  its  union  with  the  lime  are  the  active 
agents  in  destroying  insects,  and  its  insecticidal  effect  will  be  largely 
determined  by  the  proportion  of  sulphur  employed. 

Sulphur  occurs  naturally  in  large  quantities  in  the  form  of  sul- 
phids,  as   pyrites  or  sulphates,  as   gypsum,  and   native  in  volcanic, 
regions  in  vast  beds,  more  or  less  mixed  with  gypsum  and  various- 
earthy  materials.     The   sulphur   is   separated   from   the  ore  or   its. 
impurities    by  a   process   of   fusion,   and    the  melted   sulphur  thus 
secured,  which  is  caught  in  molds,  is  the  ordinary  brimstone  of  com- 
merce.    Brimstone  is  not  sufficiently  pure  for  all  purposes,  and  is 
refined  by  sublimation,  which  consists  in  heating  the  brimstone  in 
suitable  retorts  until  it  vaporizes.     The  sulphur  vapor  passes  into 
a  condensing  chamber,  and  that  which  first  comes  over  is  condensed 
by  coming  in  contact  with  the  cold  walls  of  the  chamber  and  deposited 
in  a  minutely  divided  condition.     This  deposit  is  scraped  from  the 
walls  of  the  chamber  before  the  latter  become  hot,  and  constitutes 
the  so-called  flowers  of  sulphur.     After  a  few  days'  continuous  use 
the  condensing  chamber  becomes  sufficiently  hot  to  cause  sulphur 
to  fuse  or  melt  and  run  to   the  bottom  of  the  condenser,  where  it 
is  collected  and  run  into  molds,  producing  stick,  or  roll,  sulphur. 
This,  when  finely  ground,  is  designated  flour  sulphur,  two  grades 
being  commonly  found  on  the,  market,  light  and  heavy  flour,  depend- 
ing on  the  grinding  and  bolting  processes.     In  the  process  of  sub- 
liming, the  impurities  in  the  brimstone  do  not  pass  over  into  the 
condensing  chamber,  and  the  flour  and  flowers  of  sulphur  are  equally 
pure,  differing  practically  only  in  fineness,  though  the  latter  may  be 
somewhat  more  acid.     Either  the  flour  or  flowers  of  sulphur  may 
be  used  in  the  preparation  of  lime-sulphur  washes,  and  in  the  writer's 
experience  they  are  equally  satisfactory.     There  appears    to  be  no 
basis  in  fact  for  the  preference  of  some  orchardists  for  flowers  of 
sulphur  as   against  flour  sulphur,  and   as   the   latter  is   somewhat, 
cheaper  it  should  be  preferred. 

Ground  brimstone  has  been  utilized  to  a  limited  extent  in  lime- 
sulphur  washes,  but  exact  data  are  lacking  as  to  its  suitability  for 
this  purpose.  When  comparatively  free  from  impurities  and  finely 
ground  and  bolted,  as  in  the  preparation  of  flour  sulphur,  it  would 
appear  to  be  quite  as  suitable  as  the  latter,  and  by  its  use  the  cost 
of  the  wash  could  be  considerably  lessened. 

The  so-called  "crystalline"  sulphur  that  has  recently  come  into 

limited  use  in  some  parts  of  the  South  is  brimstone  obtained  directly 

from  the  mines,  being  melted  in  the  earth  by  means  of  superheated 

water  and  then  pumped  out  into  bins,  where  it  is  allowed  to  cool.. 

3    a  1906 28 


434  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

It  is  put  on  the  market  in  lumps  just  as  it  breaks  under  the  pick, 
and  in  this  condition  it  is  much  too  coarse  for  use  in  making  lime- 
sulphur  washes,  since  even  after  prolonged  boiling  much  free  sulphur 
remains  in  the  residue  and  is  wasted. 


Common  salt,  or  sodium  chlorid  (XaO),  has  been  considered  a 
necessary  ingredient  of  the  wash,  its  function,  however,  not  being 
definitely  ascertained.  It  was  a  constituent  of  the  wash  when  used 
as  a  sheep  dip,  and  its  usefulness  seems  not  to  hare  been  questioned 
for  some  years.  Pierce,0  as  a  result  of  careful  tests  in  California, 
was  not  able  to  detect  anv  advantage  from  its  use  in  washes  against 
peachleaf-curl  and  recommended  its  omission.  Kecent  experiments 
in  various  eastern  States,  representing  a  considerable  range  of  lati- 
tude, with  washes  made  with  and  without  salt,  support  the  con- 
clusion that  its  use  is  not  at  all  essential.  Numerous  entomologists 
recommend  its  omission,  while  others  leave  its  use  optional.  Chem- 
ical studies  of  washes  made  with  and  without  salt  show  that  its 
presence  does  not  affect  the  chemical  nature  of  the  wash.  It  has 
been  claimed  that  the  use  of  salt,  by  raising  the  specific  gravity  of 
the  wash,  raises  its  boiling-point,  insuring  a  better  union  of  the  lime 
and  sulphur;  also  that  it  causes  the  wash  to  adhere  to  the  trees 
better,  and  that  it  renders  the  precipitate  more  flocculent,  so  that  it 
remains  in  suspension  longer.  The  penetrating  power  and  causticity 
of  the  wash  may  also  be  increased  by  the  salt,  it  being  a  matter  of 
common  remark  among  sprayers  that  a  wash  in  which  salt  is  used 
is  noticeably  more  caustic  to  the  face  and  hands  than  one  from  which 
it  has  been  omitted.  Notwithstanding  these  supposed  advantages 
from  the  use  of  salt,  the  actual  tests  in  the  majority  of  cases  have 
shown  that  it  is  not  possible  to  distinguish  between  the  insecticidal 
effect  of  washes  made  with  and  those  made  without  salt.  Its  use  is, 
therefore,  not  considered  necessary. 

VARIATIONS    IX    FORMULAS. 

The  original  sheep-dip  formula,  namely,  lime  SO  pounds,  sulphur 
100  pounds,  salt  10  pounds,  sugar  20  pounds,  and  water  160  gallons, 
first  used  on  fruit  trees,  has  been  variously  modified,  often  on  mistaken 
conceptions  as  to  the  insecticidal  properties  of  the  several  constituents. 
Some  believed  that  lime  was  the  active  ingredient,  and  that  the  others 
were  necessary  to  get  the  lime  into  solution.  Until  recently  the 
necessity  for  the  salt  appears  not  to  have  been  questioned,  and  practi- 
cally nothing  was  known  of  the  chemistry  of  the  wash  until  the  studies 

"Bui.  20,  Div.  Veg.  Phys,  and  Pathol.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr..  p.  155  (1900;. 


LIME- SULPHITE    WASHES    FOR    SAN    JOSE    SCALE.  435 

of  Mr.  J.  K.  Haywood, a  of  this  Department,  in  1900  and  subsequently, 
and  of  Prof.  R.  W.  Thatcher,''  begun  in  1903.  Definite  field  experi- 
ments to  determine  the  necessary  quantity  and  proportions  of  ingre- 
dients were  first  reported  by  Pierce  in  1900, c  in  connection  with  his 
studies  of  peachleaf-curl  in  California,  and  similar  tests  in  the  control 
of  the  San  Jose  scale  under  eastern  conditions  were  begun  but  four  or 
five  years  ago.  Recently,  however,  a  large  amount  of  experimental 
work  has  been  done  and  there  is  at  present  a  considerable  literature  on 
the  subject.  Experiments  have  been  made  with  washes  containing 
the  usual  ingredients  in  varying  proportions ;  with  various  methods  of 
preparation;  with  self-boiled  washes,  etc.  In  general  it  has  been 
shown  that  all  of  the  stronger  well-boiled  washes  are  about  equall}T 
effective  in  killing  the  scale,  and  it  has  been  difficult  to  decide  upon 
one  as  against  another.  Numerous  formulas  have  thus  come  to  be 
recommended,  which,  while  undoubtedly  effective  in  killing  the  scale, 
differ  more  or  less  in  the  proportion  of  ingredients  and  mode  of  prepa- 
ration, and  this  has  had  a  tendency  to  confuse  prospective  users  and 
has  not  alwa}^s  been  conducive  to  economy.  With  an  insecticide  and 
fungicide  coming  so  generally  into  use,  it  would  appear  highly  desir- 
able, if  practicable,  that  a  standard  formula  and  method  of  prepara- 
tion be  adopted,  based  on  greatest  economy  consistent  with  effective- 
ness. Present  recommendations  of  a  number  of  State  and  station 
entomologists  and  of  the  Bureau  of  Entomology  are  given  in  the  table 
on  page  437,  calculated  on  a  uniform  basis  of  100  gallons  of  wash. 

The  quantity  of  lime  per  100  gallons  of  wash  is  seen  to  vary  from 
25  to  80  pounds,  ranging,  in  the  majority  of  formulas,  however,  from 
30  to  50  pounds.  The  variation  in  sulphur  (the  more  expensive 
ingredient)  per  100  gallons  is  considerably  less,  namely,  from  25  to 
40  pounds,  ranging  mostly  between  30  and  35  pounds,  which  quantity 
is  sufficient  to  insure  a  satisfactory  wash.  In  numerous  formulas 
salt  has  been  omitted  entirely  or  its  use  left  optional.  When  rec- 
ommended, the  amount  varies  from  10  to  33J  pounds.  The  period  of 
cooking  varies  from  thirty  minutes  to  two  hours.  There  is  also  much 
diversity  in  details  of  preparation  (not  shown  in  the  table)  as  to  the 
treatment  of  ingredients,  the  order  of  placing  them  in  the  cooking 
vessel,  and  the  use  of  hot  or  cold  water  in  the  final  dilution. 

During  the  last  two  years  the  Bureau  of  Entomology  has  devoted 
some  attention  to  field  experiments  with  lime-sulphur  washes  in 
order  to  determine  an  efficient  and  economical  formula  and  to  secure 
information  on  other  questions  pertaining  to  its  practical  use.  As 
a  part  of    this  investigation  an  extended  chemical  study  of   lime- 

oBul.  30,  n.  b.,  Div.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  p.  35  (1901);  Jour.  Am.  Chem.  Soc, 
Vol.  XXVII,  p.  247  (1905). 

6 Bui.  56,  Wash.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  (1903) ;  Bui.  70,  Wash.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  (1906). 
c  Loc.  cit. 


436  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

sulphur  washes  has  been  made  by  Mr.  J.  K.  Haywood,  of  the  Bureau 
of  Chemistry. a  In  the  field  experiments  the  same  formulas  were 
tested  in  three  distinct  latitudes,  namely,  in  Georgia,  at  Fort  Valley; 
in  Maryland,6  at  Laurel.  Jessups.  and  Patuxent:  and  in  western 
New  York,  at  Youngstown.  in  1905.  and  at  North  East.  Pa.,  in  1906, 
It  was  thought  that  by  making  tests  of  identical  formulas  in  a  north- 
ern, a  middle,  and  a  southern  State  possible  differences  in  results  due 
to  climatic  or  other  conditions  would  be  more  readily  explained. 
The  experiments  have  included  the  treatment  of  scale-infested 
apple,  peach,  and  Japan  plum  trees,  and  unless  otherwise  indicated 
applications  of  sprays  were  made  shortly  before  growth  of  trees  had 
begun  in  spring.  Peach  and  plum  trees  treated  were  average  5  to  7 
year  trees  and  the  largest  apple  trees  were  S  or  9  years  old.  In 
general  satisfactory  results  were  obtained  from  all  of  the  well-boiled 
washes  containing  not  less  than  15  pounds  of  sulphur  to  50  gallons 
of  water,  with  a  slight  balance  in  favor  of  the  stronger  washes,  espe- 
cially for  first  treatment  of  badly  infested  trees.  Washes  containing 
somewhat  less  than  15  pounds  of  sulphur  to  50  gallons  of  water  were 
not  satisfactory  in  killing  the  scale.  Some  conclusions  reached  by 
these  tests  are: 

(1)  An  efficient  and  economical  formula  is  lime  20  pounds,  sulphur 
15  pounds,  water  to  make  50  gallons,  and  boiled  for  one  hour. 

(2)  Salt  is  not  a  necessary  ingredient  of  the  wash. 

(3)  The  self-boiled  lime-sulphur-caustic-soda  wash  is  reasonably 
efTective  and  should  be  used  when  it  is  not  practicable  to  provide  a 
cooking  plant  for  making  the  boiled  wash.  The  self-boiled  lime- 
sulphur  wash  is  much  less  efficient  and  is  wasteful. 

i4>  Applications  in  late  fall  give  good  results,  but  not  so  good  as 
applications  in  spring. 

From  general  observations  careless  preparation  and  lack  of  thor- 
ough application  are  considered  the  principal  causes  of  unsatisfactory 
results  in  the  use  of  the  lime-sulphur  wash. 

"Bui.  101,  Bureau  of  Chemistry.  The  Lime-Sulphur-Salt  Wash  and  Its  Substi- 
tutes. 

&  Experiments  in  Maryland  in  cooperation  with  the  Maryland  Agricultural  Experi- 
ment Station. 


LIME-SULPHUR    WASHES    FOR    SAX    JOSE    SCALE. 


437 


Lime-sirf phitr-salt  wash  formulas  recommended  in  various  xStates  and  hi/  the  Bureau  of 

Entomology. 


Quick- 
lime. 


Alabama 

California: 

Agricultural  experiment  sta- 
tion. 

State   horticultural   commis- 
sion. 

Connecticut : 

Storrs     agricultural    experi- 
ment station. 

Agricultural  experiment  sta- 
tion. 

DelawE  re 

Georgia: 

State  board  of  entomology. . 
Experiment  station 


Illinois 

Kentucky 

Maryland 

Massachusetts. 
Michigan 


Missouri  (agricultural  experiment 
station). 


Ohio: 


State  department  of  agricul- 
ture. 

Agricultural  experiment  sta- 
tion. 


Oregon. 


Tennessee 

Pennsylvania 

New  York: 

Agricultural  experiment  sta- 
tion. 

State  entomologist 

New  Jersey 


North  I 
Virginia 

Washington. . 


Bureau  of  Entomology.  U.  S.  De- 
partment of  Agriculture. 


:  Lbs. 

42 
50 

.50 
50 
SO 

40 

42 

30 
50 
40 
331 
40 
30 

33$ 

30  or  40 

331 

42 
44 

40 

40 
33i 

40 
30 
25 
40 


Flour  or 
flowers  of 
sulphur. 


Lbs. 


Salt.     Water. 


Time  of  cooking. 


Lbs.       Galls. 


33J 
33J 

40 
35 
40 

32 
36 

30 
35 
30 
331 
30 
30 

331 

30 

33J 

36 
34 

30  i 

30 
331 


16J 

2.3 

0 

n 

30or0 

20  or  0  ; 
lOorO 


0 
331 


34    20  or  0 

30  ' 

25  j  0 

30  I  0 


100     35  minutes,  or  until  of  a  dirty 
yellowish-green  color. 

100     1  to  2  hours. 

1     2  hours,  or  until  sulphur  is  thor- 
oughly dissolved. 


100 
100 
100 


100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 


30  to  45  minutes. 
Three-fourths  to  1  hour. 
30  minutes. 

40  minutes  to  1  hour. 

35  to  40  minutes,  or  until  mix- 
ture is  yellowish-green  color. 

1  hour. 

35  minutes. 

1  hour. 

1J  hours  or  longer. 

1  hour  or  more. 

2  hours. 


100     1  hour. 

100      45  minutes  at  lsast. 

100  \  1  hour,  or  until  mixture  is  of  a 
deep  blood-red  color. 

100     1  hour. 

100     1  hour. 


100  ,  1  hour. 

100  30  minutes  at  least. 

100  Boil  until  mixture  becomes  deep 
amber  color. 

100  30  minutes. 

100  40  minutes. 

100  30  minutes  to  1  hour. 

100  1  hour. 


CHEMICAL    CONSIDERATIONS. 


Considerable  attention  has  been  given  to  the  chemistry  of  lime- 
sulphur  washes,  notably  by  J.  K.  Haywood,0  of  the  Bureau  of  Chem- 
istry of  this  Department,  and  by  Prof.  R.  W.  Thatcher,6  of  the 
Washington  Agricultural  Experiment  Station.     These  investigations 


aBul.  30,  n.  s.,  Div.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  p.  35  (1901);  Jn.  Am.  Chem.  Soc,  Vol. 
XXVII,  p.  247;  Bui.  101,  Bu.  Chemistry,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr. 

b Bui.  56,  Wash.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta,  (1903);  Bui.  7(5,  Wash.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  (1906). 


438  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPABTMEXT    OF    AGBICULTUBE. 

have  thrown  light  on  several  important  questions  connected  with 
the  preparation  and  use  of  these  washes,  explaining  results  noted 
in  practical  experimentation  and  indicating  in  precise  terms  the 
conditions  of  its  economical  preparation. 

EFFECT    OF   DIFFERENT    PERIODS    OF   BOILING. 

Analyses  of  washes  boiled  for  different  lengths  of  time  show  that 
the  sulphur  is  not  sufficiently  dissolved  by  15  minutes'  boiling,  and 
that  30  minutes  is  nearly  but  not  quite  long  enough,  while  boiling 
for  45  minutes  to  1  hour  dissolves  practically  all  of  the  sulphur  pres- 
ent. Analyses  of  the  self-boiled  lime-sulphur  wash  show  that  only 
about  one-twelfth  of  the  sulphur  present  is  dissolved,  there  being, 
therefore,  a  great  Waste  of  sulphur.  In  a  properly  prepared  self- 
boiled  lime-sulphur-caustic-soda  wash  about  80  per  cent  of  the  sul- 
phur present  is  put  in  solution,  whereas  if  such  a  wash  in  addition 
be  heated  for  15  or  20  minutes  about  95  per  cent  of  the  sulphur  is 
dissolved. 

USE    OF    DIFFERENT    GRADES    OF    SULPHUR. 

Analyses  of  washes  made  with  flour  sulphur  and  flowers  of  sulphur 
show  that  there  is  no  essential  difference  between  them  as  to  their 
solubility  with  a  given  period  of  boiling,  practically  all  sulphur  going 
into  solution  with  1  hour's  boiling.  In  washes  made  with  the  so-called 
crystalline  sulphur,  the  amount  of  free  sulphur  remaining  after  1 
hour's  boiling  varies  widely,  depending  on  the  size  of  lumps  of  the 
sulphur  employed,  there  being,  however,  in  all  cases  quite  too  much 
waste  to  render  its  use  advisable.  Crystalline  sulphur,  when  finely 
ground,  largely  goes  into  solution  after  thoroughly  boiling  from  lh 
to  2  hours.     Generally  the  latter  period  will  be  found  preferable. 

OMISSION    OF    SALT:    EFFECT    OF    REHEATING. 

Repeated  analyses  have  shown  that  salt  has  no  effect  whatever  on 
the  chemical  composition  or  physical  character  of  the  wash,  thus  con- 
firming the  conclusions  as  to  its  uselessness  in  practical  field  tests. 

Reheated  lime-sulphur  washes  do  not  differ  chemically  or  physically 
from  freshly  prepared  washes  of  ordinary  strengths.  A  very  strong 
wash,  as.  for  example,  one  yet  undiluted,  upon  cooling  forms  many 
crystals,  which,  however,  dissolve  upon  reheating. 

PBEPARATIOX    OF    THE    WASH. 

The  recommendations  made  at  the  present  time  for  the  prepara- 
tion of  the  lime-sulphur  washes  vary  more  or  less  as  to  the  handling 
of  the  ingredients  preparatory  to  cooking,  but  these  variations  appear 
to  be  of  little  if  any  importance  as  affecting  the  character  of  the 
finally  prepared   wash.      The  satisfactory  results  obtained  from  the 


LT.UE-SULPHUR    WASHES    FOR    SAX    JOSE    SCALE.  439 

use  of  washes  prepared  in  various  ways  indicate  that  it  is  quite  imma- 
terial whether  the  lime  be  first  slaked  in  whole  or  in  part  and  the  sul- 
phur added,  or  the  sulphur  be  added  to  the  cooking  vessel  followed 
by  the  lime,  or  all  ingredients  be  added  together.  Manifestly  the 
practice  least  troublesome  should  be  followed.  More  importance, 
however,  must  be  attached  to  the  period  of  cooking,  concerning  which 
recommendations  are  not  uniform.  If  cooking  is  insufficient,  free 
sulphur  will  remain  in  the  wash  imcombined  with  the  lime  and, 
according  to  present  belief,  will  be  largely  wasted.  If  cooking  is 
continued  longer  than  necessary  to  effect  a  chemical  combination 
of  sulphur  and  lime,  there  is  simply  a  waste  of  labor  and  fuel,  but 
perhaps  no  other  objectionable  effect.  The  period  of  cooking  will 
vary  somewhat,  depending  upon  the  heat  maintained'and  the  kind  of 
sulphur  used.*  Practically,  as  chemical  studies  show,  there  will  be  no 
difference  between  the  flour  and  the  flowers  of  sulphur  in  regard  to 
the  time  required  to  bring  into  solution.  Sulphur  in  coarser  par- 
ticles, or  lumps,  as  the  so-called  crystalline  sulphur,  will  yield  to  boil- 
ing much  more  slowly:  and  even  after  prolonged  cooking  there  may 
remain  in  the  wash  a  considerable  quantity  of  free  sulphur.  If  salt  is 
to  be  used  in  the  wash,  evidently  it  should  be  added  early  during  the 
process  of  cooking,  since  one  of  its  supposed  functions  is  to  increase 
the  specific  gravity  of  the  wash,  thus  raising  the  boiling-point. 

THE    METHOD    REO  >MMEXPF.n. 

Numerous  methods  of  preparing  the  wash,  as  followed  by  practical 
orchardists.  have  been  investigated  by  the  Bureau  of  Entomology,  or 
tested  by  it  in  the  course  of  its  experimental  work.  The  following 
formula  and  method  of  preparation  have  uniformly  resulted  in  a  sat- 
isfactory wash,  and  are  quite  simple: 

Lime pounds. .     20 

Sulphur  <  flour  >>r  flowers) do 15 

Water  to  make gallons. .     50 

Preparation. — Heat  in  a  cooking  barrel  or  vessel  about  one-third 
of  the  total  quantity  of  water  required.  When  the  water  is  hot  add 
all  the  lime,  and  at  once  add  all  the  sulphur,  which  should  previously 
have  been  made  into  a  thick  paste  with  water.  After  the  lime  has 
slaked,  about  another  third  of  the  water  should  be  added,  preferably 
hot,  and  the  cooking  should  be  continued  for  an  hour,  when  the  final 
dilution  may  be  made,  using  either  hot  or  cold  water  as  is  most  con- 
venient. The  boiling  due  to  the  slaking  of  the  lime  thoroughly 
mixes  the  ingredients  at  the  start,  but  subsequent  stirring  is  necessary 
if  the  wash  is  cooked  by  direct  heat  in  kettles.  If  cooked  by  steam  no 
stirring  will  be  necessary.  After  the  wash  has  been  prepared  it  must 
be  well  strained  as  it  is  being  run  into  the  spray  pump  barrel,  or  tank. 


.440  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


COOKING. 


The  ingredients  of  the  wash,  in  proper  proportion,  are  boiled  to-' 
gether  in  water,  by  which  means  chemical  action  between  the  lime 
and  sulphur  is  brought  about,  producing  in  solution  the  insecticidal 
properties  of  the  wash,  the  extent  of  chemical  action  depending 
directly  upon  the  length  of  time  cooking  continues.  From  45  minutes 
to  an  hour  of  vigorous  boiling  will  put  practically  all  of  the  sulphur 
into  solution,  and  preference  should  be  given  to  the  latter  period.  A 
properly  cooked  wash  is  a  heavy,  caustic,  orange-yellow  liquid,  with1 
a  strong  sulphurous  odor.  Upon  standing,  the  sediment  settles  to  the 
bottom,  leaving  the  liquid  relatively  clear.  Sometimes  the  wash  is 
dark  green  when  the  lime  is  thoroughly  mixed  with  the  liquid  portion,' 
but  when  the  wash  is  allowed  to  settle  the  supernatant  liquid  is  the 
usual  orange-yellow.  This  is  probably  due  to  the  presence  of  iron  and 
manganese  sulphids  in  the  lime.  Prolonged  boiling  tends  to  produce 
small  quantities  of  other  sulphur  and  lime  compounds,  but  these  are 
of  practically  no  importance.  Aside  from  the  waste  of  fuel,  prolonged 
cooking  is  much  preferable  to  insufficient  cooking.  The  residue  or 
insoluble  matter  left  in  vessels  after  cooking  should  be  frequently 
examined.  If,  with  sufficient  cooking,  it  shows  up  yellow,  it  indicates 
the  presence  of  free  sulphur,  and  more  lime  is  needed.  The  presence 
in  the  residue  of  both  lime  and  sulphur  indicates  that  more  boiling 
is  needed.  The  kind  of  apparatus  employed  in  cooking  is  immaterial, 
but  it  should  be  efficient,  convenient,  and  economical.  Scarcely  any 
two  cooking  plants  are  alike,  and  there  is  afforded  opportunity  for 
the  exercise  of  considerable  ingenuity  in  their  construction  to  best 
meet  individual  conditions. 

OUTFITS    FOR    COOKING    ON    A    SMALL    SCALE. 

For  small  orchards,  of  50  acres  or  less,  it  may  not  be  considered 
advisable  by  owners  to  fix  up  a  steam  cooking  plant,  but  the  writer 
believes  it  would  be  economy  to  do  so  where  orchards  of  25  acres  or 
more  are  to  be  treated,  especially  if  the  trees  are  large  ones.  If  but 
small  quantities  of  wash  are  needed,  as  for  the  treatment  of  a  small 
home  orchard,  an  ordinary  kettle  or  hog  scalder  will  be  satisfactory. 
It  may  be  placed  on  bricks  on  the  ground  and  the  fire  built  beneath,  as 
in  the  ordinary  heating  of  water.  The  kettle  should  hold  35  to  40 
gallons,  and  preferably  more  if  a  barrel  spray  pump  is  to  be  kept  sup- 
plied; and  it  will  be  necessary  to  make  final  dilution  of  the  wash  in  the 
spray-pump  barrel.  With  some  such  facilities  for  cooking,  one  barrel 
sprayer  can  be  kept  busy  most  of  the  time. 

For  larger  orchards,  if  a  steam  outfit  is  not  considered  advisable, 
large  iron  kettles  holding  from  60  to  80  gallons  should  be  placed  in 
a  brick  furnace,  one  or  more  kettles  being  used,  according  to  size  of 
orchard  and  the  number  of  spray  gangs  which  it  is  proposed  to  run. 


LIME-SULPHUR    WASHES    FOR    SAX    JOSE    SCALE. 


441 


With  a  battery  of  three  or  four  large  kettles  and  with  proper  water  facil- 
ities from  150  to  200  gallons  of  wash  may  be  prepared  every  hour. 
An  important  objection  to  this  method  of  cooking  is  that  the  wash, 
when  prepared,  must  be  dipped  from  the  kettles  and  poured  into 
the  spray  barrel  or  tank,  entailing  an  important  loss  of  time;  and 
to  prevent  burning,  while  cooking,  the  wash  must  be  constantly 
stirred.  Time  and  labor  saving  conveniences,  however,  may  often 
be  provided  which  will  considerably  lessen  these  difficulties.  Thus  in 
Plate  XXXVII,  figure  1,  is  shown  a  convenient  single-kettle  furnace. 
The  water  is  forced  from  a  spring  by  means  of  a  ram  into  barrels 
slightly  above  the  level  of  the  kettle,  to  which  it  is  supplied  in  pipes 
by  gravitation.  From  the  kettle  the  cooked  wash  is  poured  into  a 
trough  which  delivers  it  directly  through  a  strainer  into  the  spray  tank. 


K&T£>4A* //^/C£:7~ 


Fig.  15.— Two  plans  for  conducting  steam  into  barrels:  A,  pipe  entering  from  above,  and  terminating 
in  double  T.  with  perforations  in  the  arms;  B,  pipe  entering  barrel  near  base,  and  forming  a  circle. 
(From  Waite.) 

STEAM    COOKING    OUTFITS. 

In  most  of  the  larger  commercial  orchards  which  are  infested 
with  San  Jose  scale  steam  plants  have  been  provided  for  cooking 
the  wash,  and  these  vary  much  in  detail.  The  steam  boilers  used 
for  supplying  steam  vary  from  3  or  4  horsepower  to  12,  15,  or  20 
horsepower — the  smaller  usually  of  the  upright  type,  the  larger 
mostly  horizontal  and  stationary,  though  some  portable  boilers 
are  in  use.  Boilers  of  3  or  4  horsepower,  such  as  are  used  for  feed- 
cooking  purposes,  are  suitable  when  but  2  or  3  barrels  of  wash  are 
to  be  prepared  at  a  time,  and  will  in  addition  keep  1  or  2  barrels 


U2 


YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


of  water  hot.  A  boiler  of  12  or  lo  horsepower  will  furnish  sufficient 
steam  for  cooking  simultaneously  S  to  10  barrels  of  wash,  keeping 
hot  the  necessary  amount  of  water,  and  operating  the  pump  for 
supplying  the  water  tank  with  water.  In  general,  1  horsepower 
will  be  required  for  each  cooking  barrel  or  similar  vessel,  but  there 
should  be  allowed  an  excess  of  power  amounting  to  25  or  30  per  cent 
for  heating  water,  pumping,  etc.  The  general  arrangement  of 
three  cooking  plants  is  shown  in  Plate  XXXYIII.  An  outfit  such  as 
shown  in  the  middle  figure  of  Plate  XXXYIII  lacks  much  in  con- 
venience, as  is  at  once  apparent.  The  plant  shown  at  figure  2  of 
Plate  XXXVII  is  an  especially  convenient  one,  and  might  well  serve 
as  a  model  for  persons  contemplating  the  construction  of  a  steam 
cooking  plant  with  a  capacity  of  6  or  8  barrel.-. 


Fig.  16. — Top  view  of  plant  for  cooking  lime-sulphur  wash,  showing  piping 
plan  when  steam  is  supplied  from  above  barrels;  also  water  inlet  and  pipe 
for  drawing  off  the  wash.     (From  Waitf>. 


In  the  construction  of  steam  cooking  plants  attention  should  be 
given  to  the  following  requisites: 

(1;  The  platform  should  be  strong  and  roomy  and  of  sufficient 
height  to  permit  the  wagons  to  be  driven  alongside  and  the  spray 
tanks  to  be  filled  directly  from  the  cooking  vessels  by  gravitation. 

_  The  >team  boiler  should  be  of  sufficient  size  to  allow  approx- 
imately 1  horsepower  for  each  cooking  barrel  or  equivalent,  with  a 
2.5  or  30  per  cent  excess  of  power  for  heating  water  and  pumping 
water  into  the  water-supply  tank. 

The  arrangement  of  pipes  should  be  such  that  these  will  be 
as  little  in  the  way  as  is  consistent  with  their  use.  Valves  should 
be  provided  which  will  permit  the  operation  of  one  or  more  cooking 
vessels  independently  of  the  others. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XXXVI 


Fig.   1. — A  Single   Kettle   Furnace. 

[Water  is  supplied  by  a  rani  tn  barrels,  from  which  it  runs  by  gravity  to  kettle.    The  prepared 
wash  is  delivered  by  trough  to  spray  tank.     (  Original. )] 


-.-*    ■  :      "  '"'. '---a.- 


Fis.   2. — A  Well-arranged  Plant  for  Cooking  the  Wash  on  a  Large  Scale.      (After  R.   I.   Smith.) 

Plants  for  Cooking  Lime-sulphur  Wash. 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,   :906. 


Plate  XXXVIII. 


Plants  for  Cooking  Lime-sulphur  Wash. 
[Top  Beure.-A  western  New  York  outfit.    Middle  figure.-An  inconvenient  cooking  plant 
the  wash  being  dipped  from  barrels  by  hand.    Bottom  r.gure.-An  outfit  with  two  large 
tanks  for  i king,  with  boiler  between.] 


LIME-SULPHUR    WASHES    FOE    SAX    JOSE    SCALP:.  443 

(4)  There  must  be  an  ample  supply  of  water,  preferably  so  situated 
that  water  may  be  supplied  to  cooking  barrels  and  spray  tanks  by 
gravitation. 

When  barrels  are  used  as  cooking;  vessels  one  of  two  plans  of  piping 
is  followed.  In  the  first  the  main  steam  pipe,  which  should  be  of  the 
same  size  as  the  outlet  at  the  boiler,  extends  along  the  base  of  the 
barrels,  with  a  smaller  steam  discharge  pipe  leading  directly  into 
each  barrel,  terminating  in  a  single  perforated  coil  (fig.  15,  B,  and 
PI.  XXXVII,  fig.  2).  In  the  other  plan  the  steam  is  conveyed  above 
the  barrels,  to  which  it  is  supplied  by  smaller  vertical  pipes,  reaching 
to  within  a  few  inches  of  the  bottom  of  the  barrels,  terminating  in  a 
double  T.  with  arms  of  perforated  pipe  (fig.  15,  A,  and  fig.  16). 

While  the  50-gallon  barrel  makes  a  convenient  unit  as  a  cooking  ves- 
sel, some  orchardists  prefer  large  round  or  square  tanks  (PL  XXXVIII, 
bottom  figure)  in  which  a  large  amount  of  wash  can  be  made  up  at 
once,  often  sufficient  for  the  day's  use.  By  this  means  it  is  claimed 
a  saving  in  fuel  and  labor  is  effected.  In  using  large  tanks,  however, 
there  should  be  an  abundance  of  perforated  pipe  along  the  bottom 
to  secure  proper  distribution  of  the  steam. 

In  portions  of  the  country  where  individual  orchards  are  small,  but 
situated  close  together,  a  central  cooking  plant  may  often  be  used  in 
cooperation,  or  by  an  individual  who  supplies  the  wash  during  the 
spraying  season  to  the  orchardists  of  the  community.  The  practi- 
cability of  this  plan  has  already  been  demonstrated. 

TIME    OF    APPLICATION    OF    THE    WASH. 

Lime-sulphur  washes,  as  herein  considered,  are  suitable  only  for  the 
treatment  of  trees  which  are  in  a  dormant  state,  being  much  too  strong 
for  application  to  trees  in  foliage.  Experiments  indicate  that  the 
best  results  follow  applications  in  spring,  just  before  the  growth  of 
the  tree  begins.  These  late  applications  insure  a  maximum  amount  of 
wash  on  the  trees  when  the  young  'dice  "  begin  to  appear  later  in  the 
season  from  females  which  may  have  escaped  treatment.  The  later 
effect  of  the  wash  is  quite  as  important  as  its  direct  insecticidal 
action  on  the  insects  when  applied.  In  large  commercial  orchards, 
however,  it  is  necessary  to  begin  spraying  operations  at  the  first  suit- 
able time  in  spring,  or  even  during  favorable  periods  in  the  winter,  on 
account  of  the  large  amount  of  work  to  be  done.  The  unfavorable 
weather  conditions  often  prevailing  during  spring  and  the  urgency 
of  other  work  have  led  some  orchardists  to  spray  in  late  fall  and  early 
winter.  The  value  of  fall  applications  in  killing  the  scale  and  their 
effects  on  the  trees  have  been  investigated  to  some  extent  by  ento- 
mologists, principally  in  Maryland  a  and    New  York,6  and  by  the 

"  Bui.  90.  Md.  Agr.  Exp.  Station  (1903). 
b  Bui.  273,  X.  Y.  Agr.  Exp.  Station  (1905). 


444  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Bureau  of  Entomology.  In  general  it  appears  that  fall  treatment  of 
trees  will  keep  the  scale  in  cheek,  though  more  or  less  of  injury  may 
result  to  ;-orac  fruits,  as  peach  and  plum,  by  the  destruction  of  fruit 
buds  and  terminal  shoots,  varying  with  the  time  of  application,  ripe- 
ness  of  the  wood.  etc.  If  spring  applications  can  not  be  made,  late 
fall  or  early  winter  applications  are  advised;  the  possible  injury  to 
the  tree  will  be  in  a  measure  balanced  by  its  increased  vigor  in  growth, 
due  to  control  of  the  scale. 

EQUIPMENT    FOR    SPRAYING. 

Spraying  outfits  for  applying  the  lime-sulphur  washes  are  those  used 
for  spraying  generally.  Barrel  spray  pumps  are  much  used  by  the 
smaller  orchardists.  and  tanks  holding  100  to  300  gallons,  fitted  with 
large  hand  pumps  with  double  vertical  or  horizontal  cylinders,  are 
used  by  the  larger  orchardists.  (See  PI.  XXXIX.  fig.  1.  Lese 
generally,  gasoline  or  other  power  outfits  are  employed.  Whatever 
the  outfit  used,  provision  should  be  made  for  keeping  the  wash  in  the 
barrel  or  tank  thoroughly  agitated:  the  hose  should  be  of  ample 
length  and  should  be  fitted  with  a  bamboo  extension  rod  to  reach  the 
higher  portions  of  the  trees  and  to  protect  the  sprayers  as  much  as 
possible.  At  the  junction  of  the  hose  and  extension  rod  a  stopcock 
should  be  provided  whereby  the  spray  may  be  shut  ofT  when  desired, 
as  in  passing  from  one  tree  to  another.  In  spraying  high  trees  some 
form  of  elevated  platform  should  be  provided  on  the  wagon,  as  shown 
in  Plate  XXXIX,  figure  2,  thus  facilitating  thorough  applications  to 
the  tops  of  the  trees. 

The  spray  nozzle  is  one  of  the  most  important  parts  of  the  outfit, 
and  many  of  the  nozzles  in  use  by  orchardists  are  practical  handicaps 
to  good  work.  Orchardists  are  urged  to  give  more  attention  to  this 
part  of  their  spraying  equipment.  The  Yermorel  and  nozzles  of  that 
type  are  best,  and  should  always  be  provided  with  a  plunger  for  remov- 
ing any  temporary  obstruction  in  the  outlet  orifice.  In  spraying  the 
lime-sulphur  wash  caps  should  be  used  with  an  orifice  one-sixteenth 
of  an  inch  in  diameter,  and  a  supply  of  caps  should  be  kept  on  hand 
to  replace  the  worn  ones  when  the  spray  becomes  too  coarse.  In  the 
operation  of  ^praying  a  pressure  should  be  maintained  of  not  less 
than  75  pounds,  and  preferably  much  higher.  To  maintain  this 
with  a  barrel  or  tank  hand  pump  with  two  leads  of  hose,  each  with 
two  or  more  nozzles,  requires  constant  hard  work  in  pumping.  The 
tendency  will  be  to  allow  the  pressure  to  lighten,  with  a  consequent 
falling  off  in  efficiency  of  the  spraying.  While  there  is  some  differ- 
ence in  ease  of  working  of  the  different  makes  of  hand  pumps,  the 
danger  of  working  with  too  low  pressure  will  always  be  present,  and 
especially  if  careless  labor  is  employed.  Power  outfits  are.  therefore, 
advised  where  their  operation  is  practicable  and  the  orchard  interest 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  15 


Plate  XXXIX. 


— A  Gasoline  Power  Outfit   Used  in  Western   New  York.      (Original.) 

Outfits  Used  for  Spraying  Lime-sulphur  Wash. 


LIME-SULPHUR    WASHES    FOR    SAX     JOSE    SCALE.  445 

warrants  their  purchase.  In  treating  the  San  Jose  scale  thorough 
spraying  is  particularly  important,  and  especial  pains  should  be  taken 
to  coat  every  part  of  the  tree  thoroughly,  from  the  topmost  twigs  to 
the  ground.  "When  quite  dormant,  trees  may  be  thoroughly  drenched 
without  danger  of  injury,  and  excessive  spraying  is  preferable  to 
deficient  spraying.  During  windy  weather  thorough  spraying  is 
often  impossible,  and  under  such  conditions,  or  if  for  any  other  reason 
the  first  treatment  has  not  been  satisfactory,  a  second  application  is 
very  desirable  to  reach  the  places  that  have  been  missed  during  the 
first  treatment. 

The  caustic,  disagreeable  character  of  the  wash  is  frequently  com- 
plained of  by  orchardists  and  orchard  workers.  Much  may  be  done 
to  remove  the  objections  to  its  use  by  spray  gangs  by  supplying  the 
men  with  rubber  coats  and  gloves.  The  use  of  vaseline  on  the  face  is 
advisable  in  working  during  windy  weather,  and  clear  glass  goggles 
may  be  used  to  protect  the  eyes.  Lime-sulphur  wash  is  very  hard  on 
the  pumps,  and  these  should  be  thoroughly  cleaned  at  the  close  of 
each  day's  use. 

SELF-BOILED    WASHES. 

The  expense  of  establishing  cooking  plants  and  of  their  operation 
constitutes  an  important  objection  to  the  lime-sulphur  wash,  and  some 
attention  has  been  given  by  entomologists  to  the  devising  and  testing 
of  washes  made  simply  by  the  heat  generated  by  the  slaking  of  the 
lime,  or  by  the  additional  heat  following  the  addition  of  caustic  soda. 

SELF-BOILED    LIME-SULPHUR    WASH. 

This  wash  is  prepared  without  direct  heat  by  placing  in  a  barrel  or 
other  suitable  container  40  pounds  of  good  stone  lime  and  adding  15 
pounds  of  flour  or  flowers  of  sulphur  which  has  been  worked  into  a 
paste  with  water.  The  lime  is  started  slaking  by  the  addition  of  10 
or  12  gallons  of  hot  water,  and  the  mixture  should  be  stirred  occa- 
sionally as  the  slaking  proceeds,  the  barrel  or  vessel  being  kept  cov- 
ered as  much  as  possible.  After  the  lime  is  all  slaked,  water  is  added 
to  bring  up  to  50  gallons  of  wash.  In  the  experiments  of  the  Bureau 
of  Entomology  this  wash  has  not  been  satisfactory.  Sufficient  heat 
is  not  generated  during  the  slaking  of  the  lime  to  bring  into  solution  a 
sufficient  quantity  of  sulphur. 

SELF-BOILED    l-IME-SULPHUR-CAUSTIC-SODA    WASH. 

To  prepare  this  wash,  place  in  a  suit  aide  barrel  or  other  vessel  30 
pounds  of  good  quicklime  and  start  slaking  with  sufficient  hot  water 
to  prevent  air-slaking.  As  soon  as  the  slaking  is  well  under  way  add 
15  pounds  of  sulphur  previously  worked  into  a  paste  with  water,  and 
stir  thorousdilv.     Hot  water  is  added  from  time  to  time  in  sufficient 


446  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

quantity  to  bring  the  mixture  up  to  a  thin  paste.  After  slaking  has 
ceased  add  5  or  6  pounds  of  commercial  caustic  soda,  stirring  until 
the  soda  is  dissolved.  To  this  should  be  added  sufficient  water  to 
bring  up  to  50  gallons  of  wash. 

RANGE    OF    USEFULNESS    OF    LIME-SULPHUR    "WASHES. 

In  the  foregoing  discussion  the  wash  has  been  considered  more  par- 
ticularly with  reference  to  its  value  in  destroying  the  San  Jose  scale. 
There  are  numerous  other  insects  which  may  coexist  on  fruit  trees 
with  the  San  Jose  scale,  and  the  wash  is  very  useful  in  destroying 
some  of  these,  as  well  as  in  reducing  fungous  diseases.  Without 
doubt  most  of  the  scale  insects  of  the  subfamily  to  which  the  San  Jose 
scale  belongs  (Diaspinre)  will  be  controlled  by  the  wash.  This  has 
been  shown  to  be  the  case  for  Forbes  scale  (Aspidioius  forbesii) ,  West 
Indian  peach  scale  (Diaspis  peniagona),  the  scurfy  scale  (Chionaspis 
furfura),.  and  the  oyster-shell  scale  {Lepidosa plies  ulmi).  Unfortu- 
nately, however,  it  appears  to  be  ineffective  on  Lecanium  scales,  such 
as  the  terrapin  scale  {Eulecanium  nigrofasciatum) .  Its  value  in 
destroying  the  winter  eggs  of  aphides  affecting  the  foliage  and  twigs 
of  the  apple  has  been  demonstrated  by  Prof.  J.  M.  Aldrich,a  and 
observations  by  Mr.  Fred  Johnson,  of  this  Bureau,  in  western  New 
York  in  1905,  indicate  that  it  is  quite  effective  in  destroying  the  eggs 
of  the  pear  tree  Psylla  (Psylla  pyri).  There  is  no  doubt  of  its  efficacy 
in  destroying  the  pear-leaf  blister  mite  (Eriojiliycs  pyri),  which  winters 
in  the  adult  condition  behind  the  bud  scales  of  its  host  plant,  and  also 
the  so-called  "silvering  mite"  of  the  peach  (Phyllocoptes  cornutus). 
In  California  Mr.  W.  T.  Clark6  has  shown  that  the  lime-sulphur  wash 
is  entirely  satisfactory  as  a  remedy  for  the  peach  twig  borer  (Anarsia 
lineatetta),  which  on  the  Pacific  slope  is  a  very  serious  enemy  of  the 
peach. 

It  has  been  demonstrated  by  Pierce  and  others  that  the  lime- 
sulphur  wash  is  practically  a  specific  for  peachleaf-curl,  and  recent 
experiments  at  the  New  York  Agricultural  Experiment  Station6 
indicate  that  it  may  be  substituted  for  Bordeaux  mixture  as  the 
dormant-tree  treatment  for  apple  scab.  Its  usefulness  in  a  similar 
way  for  scab  on  pears  is  very  probable.  But  few  dormant-tree  sprays 
have  a  greater  range  of  usefulness  than  lime-sulphur  wash.  In  prac- 
tice, one  thorough  application  in  spring  shortly  before  the  buds  open  is 
calculated  to  control  effectively  not  only  the  San  Jose  scale,  but  other 
scales,  excepting  lecaniums,  and  to  an  important  degree  the  insects 
and  fungous  diseases  above  mentioned  on  their  respective  host  plants. 


a  Bui.  40,  Idaho  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  (1904). 
6  Bui.  144,  Cat.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  (1902:. 
cBul.  262.  N.'Y.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta. 


NATIONAL  FORESTS  AND  THE  LIMBER  SUPPLY. 

By  Thomas  H.  Sherrard, 
Assistant  Forester,  Forest  Service. 

The  problem  of  securing  the  most  effective  use  of  the  land  concerns 
the  people  of  the  United  States  as  never  before.  The  readjustment 
of  the  stock-growing  industry  to  benefit  an  overcrowded  range  and 
the  new  agriculture — which  in  the  East  takes  expression  in  diversified 
farming,  large  drainage  projects,  and  more  intensive  methods  and  in 
the  West  in  the  great  movement  for  extended  irrigation  of  arid  lands 
and  in  dry  farming — are  but  phases  of  its  solution.  And  in  no  way  is 
the  question  more  urgent  than  in  the  use  of  our  forest  resources. 

From  pioneer  days  almost  to  the  present  time  every  energy  was 
bent  to  conquer  the  forest  and  to  win  homes  from  the  wilderness. 
Conversion  of  the  forests  into  farms  and  the  use  of  wood  in  building 
homes  was  an  essential  part  of  the  wonderful  development  of  the 
nation,  but  the  spirit  of  destruction,  which  grew  out  of  the  long 
battle  with  the  forest,  survived  long  after  the  reason  for  it  was  past. 

The  hardships  and  difficulties  resulting  from  an  inadequate  supply 
of  wood  and  water  were  first  encountered  when  settlement  reached 
the  great  treeless  plains  of  the  Middle  West,  and  long  before  a  timber 
famine  had  been  thought  of  in  the  East.  Almost  everywhere  a  point 
has  now  been  reached  where  development  of  the  country  is  made,  not 
in  the  face  of  the  forest  but  with  its  essential  aid. 

ECONOMIC  PHASES  OF  THE  FOREST  PROBLEM. 

Early  legislation  and  the  propaganda  of  theorists  and  sentimental- 
ists are  mainly  interesting  as  a  matter  of  history,  for  they  were  alike 
without  effect  upon  the  action  of  the  owners  of  timberland,  but 
certain  economic  conditions  have  now  become  powerful  checks  to 
forest  destruction. 

The  north  woods  of  Maine  and  New  York,  once  so  prominent  in 
the  lumber  activity  of  the  nation,  long  ago  dropped  out  of  sight  as 
lumber-producing  regions,  although  the  bulk  of  the  pulpwood  used 
in  the  manufacture  of  paper  is  still  drawn  from  them.  The  region  of 
the  Lake  States,  which  was  for  many  years  the  undisputed  center  of 
the  lumber  industry,  gradually  3*ielded  its  supremacy  to  the  South  and 
West.  As  early  as  1800  lumber  companies  which  had  cut  over  their 
holdings  in  Michigan,  Wisconsin,  and  Minnesota  were  compelled 
either  to  go  out  of  business  or  to  turn  elsewhere  for  available  timber. 
Then  followed  the  rush  to  the  southern  pineries  and  the  great  virgin 
forests  of  the  Pacific  coast.     During  recent  years  the  production  of 

447 


448  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

lumber  in  the  southern  pine  belt  has  been  enormous,  and  so  great 
have  been  the  inroads  upon  the  available  supply  of  southern  pine 
that  it  is  a  question  of  only  a  few  years,  hastened  by  the  construction 
of  the  Panama  Canal,  when  the  great  production  of  lumber  will  shift 
to  the  Pacific  coast.  The  old  process  of  exhausting  the  supply  of 
timber  in  a  region  and  then  seeking  new  fields  is  very  nearly  over. 
Already  the  industry  is  turning  back  on  its  tracks.  A  quality  of 
timber  is  eagerly  sought  in  the  Lake  States  which  a  few  years  ago 
was  passed  over  as  utterly  worthless,  and  certain  sawmills  have 
depended  for  a  part  of  their  supply  upon  the  recovery  of  logs  which 
have  sunk  in  the  waterways  in  process  of  transportation.  In  the 
South  the  whole  pine  region  is  being  gone  over  in  close  search  of  the 
old  field  pine.  This  inferior  and  once  despised  growth  of  timber  is 
now  bought  up  at  prices  greatly  in  excess  of  those  once  paid  for  the 
magnificent  timber  of  the  virgin  forests. 

Great  improvement  in  logging  and  sawmill  machinery,  signal  suc- 
cess in  reducing  the  waste  in  manufacture,  wonderful  railroad  exten- 
sion, concentration,  and  systematic  organization  of  producers  to 
reach  the  consumer  most  effectively  through  the  markets,  have  all 
combined  to  cheapen  the  cost  of  production  and  increase  the  profit 
in  the  lumber  business.  Yet  the  price  of  lumber  has  never  before 
been  as  high  as  in  the  year  1906.  This  increased  price  is  in  spite 
of  an  increased  production  which  it  taxes  the  railroads  to  transport. 

The  price  of  stumpage  is  far  more  stable  than  that  of  lumber,  and 
responds  very  tardily  to  fluctuations  in  the  lumber  market.  The 
usual  policy  of  disposing  of  Federal  and  State  timber  for  prac- 
tically nothing  has  acted  powerfully,  particularly  in  the  West,  to 
keep  the  selling  price  of  stumpage  far  below  its  legitimate  value. 
It  is  not  surprising  that  it  has  always  been  impossible  for  the  bulk  of 
the  owners  of  timber  to  have  a  broad  view  of  the  lumber  industry  and 
close  acquaintance  with  the  lumber  market,  for  most  of  the  cost  of 
producing  lumber  lies  in  logging  and  manufacture,  and  the  margin 
of  profit  has  varied  widely.  The  price  of  stumpage  has  always  been 
artificially  depressed,  and  has  lagged  far  behind  the  constantly 
increasing  value  of  lumber. 

ACQUIRING    LUMBER    UNDER    LAND    LAWS. 

The  act  of  June  3.  1S7S.  generally  known  as  the  timber  and  stone 
act,  provides  for  the  purchase  of  public  timber  land  at  the  uniform 
price  of  82.50  per  acre.  The  purpose  of  Congress  in  enacting  this 
law  was  to  make  it  possible  for  settlers,  miners,  and  other  actual 
users  of  timber  to.  satisfy  their  needs.  Records  of  the  General  Land 
Office  show  that  in  1904  over  55,000  entries  had  been  made  under 
this  act.  covering  an  area  of  nearly  S, 000, 000  acres.  Probably 
10,000,000  acres  of  carefully  selected  public  timberland  has  by  this 
time  passed  into  the  control  of  private  owners  under  this  law  alone. 

It  is  well  known  that  most  of  the  entries  under  this  law  have  been 


NATIONAL    FORESTS    AND    THE    LUMBER    SUPPLY.  449' 

made,  indirectly,  by  nonresidents  for  speculation.  And  the  great 
bulk  of  the  entries  have  almost  immediately  passed  into  the  hands 
of  timber  syndicates,  with  profit  to  the  original  entrymen  amounting 
to  no  more  than  bare  wages.  Thus  the  law  has  reacted  greatly  to 
the  disadvantage  of  the  very  classes  whom  it  was  intended  to  help, 
and  the  bona  fide  settler  and  miner  and  the  small  sawmill  man  have 
seen  the  public  timber  rapidly  withdrawn  and  pass  into  the  hands, 
of  speculative  syndicates. 

The  same  law  permits  the  cutting  of  timber  for  domestic  purposes 
from  mineral  lands.  The  area  classed  as  mineral  land  in  the  tim- 
bered portions  of  the  public  land  is  very  great,  and  the  construction 
put  by  the  courts  upon  the  provision  of  the  law  that  the  timber 
might  be  used  for  domestic  purposes  has  been  so  broad  as  to  include 
practically  every  purpose  for  which  timber  can  be  used.  This  act 
has  never  been  repealed. 

Abuses  have  grown  up  under  the  other  laws  which  provide  for  the 
disposition  of  public  land.  More  land  has  been  disposed  of  under 
the  "homestead  law''  than  under  all  other  land  laws  combined. 
Entries  of  timberland  under  the  homestead  law  are  common,  notably 
so  under  the  commutation  clause,  which  permits  a  brief  period  of 
residence  on  condition  of  a  cash  payment. 

Thus  the  land  laws,  while  they  have  provided  for  the  rapid  dis- 
posal of  public  timberlands,  have  tended  strongly  to  the  segregation 
of  large  holdings  of  timberland  for  speculative  purposes. 

PURCHASE    OF    NATIONAL    FOREST    TIMBER. 

The  acquisition  of  timberland  under  the  land  laws  has  been  cited 
in  order  to  contrast  it  emphatically  with  the  purchase  of  timber  itself 
for  immediate  use  under  the  National  forest  laws. 

The  act  of  March  1,  1891,  which  gave  to  the  President  the  power 
to  set  aside  National  Forests,  did  not  provide  for  their  administra- 
tion, and  therefore  effectually  locked  up  timber  from  use.  That  of 
June  4,  1897,  enlarged  the  powers  of  the  Secretary  and  provided  for 
a  protective  force. 

At  first  the  National  Forests  had  no  appreciable  effect  upon  the 
lumber  industry.  The  Forests  largely  comprised  inaccessible  tim- 
ber, and  its  purchase  was  not  encouraged.  Consumers  of  wood  and 
other  forest  products,  who  were  dependent  upon  the  Forests,  were 
confronted  with  impractical  and  troublesome  regulations.  Unneces- 
sary delay  in  the  transaction  of  business  worked  added  hardship 
and  fostered  a  feeling  of  hostility  toward  National  Forests  among  those 
who  came  into  closest  contact  with  them,  and  who  should  have  been 
made  most  sensible  of  their  benefits.  During  succeeding  years  vast 
areas  of  timberland  were  taken  up  under  the  land  laws,  and  cheap 
timber  was  on  the  market  in  immense  quantities. 

It  was  not  until  the  large  withdrawals  of  land  by  the  creation  of 
new  National  Forests  in  1903  and  1904  that  bodies  of  timber  attractive 
3    A1906 29 


450  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICTXTURE. 

to  private  enterprise  were  included.  By  these  withdrawals  entries 
under  the  timber  and  stone  act  and  the  lieu  land  law  were  checked. 
At  the  same  time  the  rapid  extension  of  railroads  and  the  great  increase 
in  settlement  and  industrial  development  in  the  West  were  operating 
to  enable  the  lumberman  to  enter  regions  once  remote  from  market. 

In  February,  1905.  the  administration  of  the  National  Forests  was 
transferred  to  the  Department  of  Agriculture,  and  the  policy  of  the 
-  -  legitimate  use  of  all  resources  of  the  Forests  has  been 
definitely  adopted.  Under  the  enlarged  powers  of  the  Secretary, 
regulations  governing  the  cutting  of  timber  have  been  greatly  sim- 
plified, and  annoying  delays  in  the  transaction  of  business  wiped  out. 
An  especial  effort  is  made  to  facilitate  applications  for  the  free  use  of 
timber  and  for  small  purchases. 

The  effect  upon  the  use  of  the  timber  of  the  National  Forests  was 
instantaneous.  Money  receipts  from  the  sale  of  timber  for  the 
fiscal  year  ended  June  30.  1905.  were  $50,000.  During  the  present 
fiscal  year  (1907)  receipts  from  timber  sold  will  probably  exceed  half 
a  million  dollars  and  contracts  for  the  sale  of  timber,  extending  from 
one  to  five  years,  will  reach  a  value  of  over  1£  million  dollars. 

The  money  return  which  the  Government  realizes  from  these  sales 
is  in  striking  contrast  to  that  received  from  the  sale  of  timberland 
under  the  land  laws.  Under  the  timber  and  stone  act  timberland 
could  be  bought  for  $2.50  per  acre,  and  under  the  lieu  land  law  it  could 
be  acquired  in  exchange  for  denuded  and  worthless  land  without 
money  payment.  Timber  from  the  Forests  is  now  purchased  by  the 
thousand  board  feet,  and  payment  is  made  upon  the  actual  scale  of 
the  logs  when  cut.  The  cut  varies  from  5.000  to  20.000  feet  per  acre. 
-  ■  at.  at  the  comparatively  low  stumpage  rate  of  $2.50  per  thousand 
feet,  the  Government  receives  from  five  to  twenty  times  as  much  for 
the  timber  as  erred  under  the  timber  and  stone  act  and  retains 

the  fond.  To  cite  a  single  example:  A  sale  of  12,000,000  feet  of  timber 
was  recently  made  on  a  National  Forest  in  Wyoming,  at  a  rate  of  $5 
per  thousand  feet.  The  proceeds  from  the  sale  of  the  timber  alone 
will  be  $4  The  timber  averages  s.000  feet  per  acre  and  covers 

1.500  acres.  Had  the  sale  been  made  under  the  timber  and  stone 
law  it  would  have  yielded  but  $3,750  for  both  timber  and  land. 

It  might  be  argued  that  the  Government  is  not  in  the  lumber 
business  and  that  it  should  dispose  of  its  remaining  timberlands  as 
rapidly  as  possible,  leaving  it  to  private  enterprise  to  exploit  them. 
But  public  opinion  is  emphatically  in  favor  of  a  more  conservative 
use  of  what  remains  of  the  National  Forests  than  would  be  possible 
were  they  turned  over  to  lumber  companies,  whose  sole  concern 
would  be  their  quick  conversion  into  cash.  The  Government  has 
been  forced  into  the  lumber  business  solely  that  a  supply  of  forest 
products  may  be  guaranteed  to  future  generations. 

The  ratio  of  the  present  yield  of  timber  cut  from  the  National 
Forests  to  that  of  the  whole  country ,  or  even  to  that  of  the  Western 


NATIONAL    FORESTS    AND    THE    LUMBER    SUPPLY.  451 

States,  is  insignificanc.  Probably  65  per  cent  of  the  total  stand  of 
merchantable  timber  within  the  Forests  is  located  on  the  Pacific  coast, 
where  for  a  long  tune  the  enormous  supply  of  privately  owned  timber 
will  satisfy  most  of  the  demand.  This  more  accessible  private  timber 
surrounded  the  Forests  as  the  meat  of  an  apple  surrounds  the  core. 
But  this  belt  of  private  timber  has  been  entirely  eaten  away  in  many 
places,  while  in  others  it  is  locked  up  for  purposes  of  speculation. 
The  thing  to  remember,  then,  is  that  this  immense  body  of  public 
timber  is  there  as  a  great  reserve  against  the  time  when  private 
timberlands  will  be  depleted,  and  for  use  as  a  weapon  against  monop- 
oly. Already,  even  on  the  Pacific  coast,  actual  operators,  who  are 
not  speculating  in  timber,  but  who,  if  they  are  to  meet  the  demands  of 
commerce,  must  have  logs  to  supply  then  mills,  are  turning  to  the 
National  Forests. 

The  advantages  in  the  purchase  of  timber  from  the  National  Forests 
to  the  actual  operator,  and  especially  to  the  sawmill  man  of  small 
means,  are  many.  There  is  no  large  initial  investment  required  in 
acquiring  timberlands  and  no  possibility  of  annoying  litigation  over 
defective  title  to  lands.  The  purchaser  is  entirely  relieved  of  taxes 
and  the  cost  of  protection.  The  Government  assumes  the  entire  risk 
of  loss  by  fire  or  other  causes. 

EFFECT    OX    THE    PRICE  OF  LUMBER. 

The  first  effect  of  National  Forests  upon  prices,  particularly  where 
there  is  still  a  great  deal  of  available  timber,  is  to  raise  the  price  of 
stumpage  toward  its  intrinsic  value  by  withdrawing  the  excess  supply 
of  low-priced  timber  from  the  market.  On  the  other  hand,  as  the 
supply  of  timber  dwindles  and  values  are  forced  upward  by  holding 
for  speculation,  the  effect  of  the  Forests  will  be  to  check  advance  in 
prices  and  make  them  lower. 

In  the  Rocky  Mountain  States  and  Territories  the  major  part  of 
the  small  remaining  supply  of  timber  is  in  the  National  Forests,  and 
here  their  beneficial  effect  upon  the  lumber  supply  may  be  more 
plainly  seen  than  on  the  Pacific  coast.  The  demand  for  timber  from 
the  Forests  throughout  this  region  has  come  very  generally  from  small 
sawmills  which  supply  towns  and  ranches  located  off  the  railroads 
and  from  mines  which  use  the  timber  for  their  own  development. 

NATIONAL    FOREST    MANAGEMENT. 

Iii  the  virgin  forest,  growth  is  just  about  balanced  by  decay.  In 
the  western  forests,  however,  natural  deterioration  is  greatly  aug- 
mented by  forest  fires.  Destruction  of  merchantable  timber  is  usually 
the  measure  of  the  damage  done  by  forest  fires,  but,  great  as  this 
injury  is,  vastly  more  actual  loss  in  forest  wealth  is  caused  by  the 
fires  which  year  after  year  burn,  practically  unnoticed,  in  the  grass 
and  undergrowth  of  the  forest.  While  these  ground  fires  do  not  con- 
sume the  large  trees,  seedlings  are  destroyed  outright,  growing  trees 
receive  injuries  winch  result  in  their  early  decay,  and  the  forest  floor, 


452  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

composed  of  a  mold  of  needles,  twigs,  and  :.  sses  is  burned  away. 
Thus  the  wonderful  recuperative  power  of  the  forest  is  lost.  That 
the  damages  done  by  fires  can  be  reduced  has  been  proved  on  the 
National  Forests  by  actually  reducing  them.  The  great  need  is  that 
there  should  be  more  men  on  the  protective  force. 

From  the  foresters  standpoint,  mature  timber  should  be  cut  in 
orde:  i  the  small  trees  more  light  and  a  chance  to  grow  and  to 

make  way  for  reproduction.  From  the  standpoint  of  national  econ- 
omv.  the  mature  timber  on  the  Forests  should  be  utilized  as  needed 
fur  the  development  of  the  West,  provided  the  local  supply  is  not 
reduced  below  the  point  ui  safety.  The  whole  weight  of  the  move- 
ment in  favor  of  National  Forests  is  squarely  against  a  reckless  use  of 
the  timber  resources,  but  it  is  emphatically  in  favor  of  the  legitimate 
use  of  timber.  The  points  of  vital  importance  are  that  the  remaining 
supply  of  timber  must  be  used  with  the  utmost  economy  and  that  in 
everv  case  reproduction  must  be  absolutely  assured. 

No  live  timber  is  cut  on  the  Forests  until  it  has  been  determined  by 
careful  study  on  the  ground  that  lumbering  will  not  injure  the  forest. 
In  eveiw  sale  of  timber,  rules  to  insure  careful  logging  are  made  a  con- 
dition of  the  sale.  It  is  often  found  advisable  to  remove  only  the 
larger,  mature  trees  and  to  leave  the  smaller  ones,  which,  although 
of  merchantable  size,  can  be  lumbered  more  profitably  when  larger. 
Seed  trees  are  left,  whenever  necessary,  to  insure  a  second  crop.  In 
felling  timber,  vigorous  measures  are  taken  to  prevent  the  destruc- 
of  promising  young  trees  and  to  prohibit  their  use  in  logging. 

In  order  to  protect  cut-over  areas  against  fire,  the  brash,  or  "slash." 
is  piled  and  burned,  and  in  dry  seasons,  when  the  danger  from  fire 

reatest,  the  cutting  areas  are  watched  or.  if  necessary.  1  _ 
-  -  tended.  Waste  in  logging  is  effectually  prevented  by  rules  framed 
to  apply  to  the  particular  class  of  timber  to  be  cut.  and  the  cut- 
ting of  low  stumps  and  the  -  .11  the  merchantable  material  in 
irtly  unsound  logs  is  enforced  by  close  supervision.  Graz- 
ing is  regulated  so  that  the  range  is  not  overcrowded  to  the  injury 
ot  the  Forest,  and  if  necessary  t->  encourage  reproduction  it  is  pro- 
hibited altogether.  In  these  and  in  many  other  ways  the  forest  is 
safeguarded. 

Far  beyond  the  present  influence  of  the  National  Forests  upon  the 
lumber  supply  will  be  their  importance  in  the  future.  The  United 
51  tea  is  now  facing  a  serious  decrease  in  the  available  supply  of 
timber.  That  from  the  National  Forests  will  aid  greatly  to  bridge 
over  the  period  of  inevitable  lack  of  mature  timber  which  will  last 
from  the  time  the  old  trees  are  gone  until  the  young  trees  are  large 
enough  to  take  their  places.  The  definite  result,  therefore,  of  the 
sale  of  timber  from  the  Forests  will  be  to  sustain  the  lumber  business, 
to  maintain  a  steady  range  of  timber  values  and  thus  to  lessen  spec- 
ulation, and.  far  more  important  still,  to  render  possible  the  unin- 
terrupted development  of  the  great  industries  dependent  upon  wood. 


APPENDIX. 


ORGANIZATION  OF  THE  DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE. a 

Secretary  of  Agriculture,  James  Wilson. 

The  Secretary  exercises  personal  supervision  of  public  business  relating  to  the 
agricultural  industry.  He  appoints  all  the  officers  and  employees  of  the  Department 
with  the  exception  of  the  Assistant  Secretary  and  the  Chief  of  the  Weather  Bureau, 
who  are  appointed  by  the  President,  and  directs  the  management  of  all  the  Bureaus, 
Divisions,  and  Offices  embraced  in  the  Department.  He  exercises  advisory  super- 
vision over  agricultural  experiment  stations  which  receive  aid  from  the  National 
Treasury,  has  control  of  the  quarantine  stations  for  imported  cattle,  of  interstate 
quarantine  rendered  necessary  by  sheep  and  cattle  diseases,  and  of  the  inspection  of 
cattle-carrying  vessels,  and  directs  the  inspection  of  domestic  and  imported  food 
products,  under  the  meat  inspection  and  pure-food  laws.  He  is  charged  with  the 
duty  of  issuing  rules  and  regulations  for  the  protection,  maintenance,  and  care  of  the 
National  forest  reserves.  He  also  is  charged  with  carrying  into  effect  the  laws  pro- 
hibiting the  transportation  by  interstate  commerce  of  game  killed  in  violation  of 
local  laws  and  excluding  from  importation  certain  noxious  animals,  and  has  authority 
to  control  the  importation  of  other  animals. 

Assistant  Secretary  of  Agriculture.  Willet  M.  Hays. 

The  Assistant  Secretary  performs  such  duties  as  may  be  required  by  law  or  pre- 
scribed by  the  Secretary.  He  also  becomes  Acting  Secretary  of  Agriculture  in  the 
absence  of  the  Secretary. 

Chief  Clerk,  S.  R.  Burch. 

The  Chief  Clerk  has  the  general  supervision  of  the  clerks  and  employees;  he  is 
charged  with  the  enforcement  of  the  internal  regulations  of  the" Department;  and  is, 
by  law,  superintendent  of  the  buildings  occupied  by  the  Department  of  Agriculture. 
He  represents  the  Department  on  the  Government  board  of  the  Jamestown  Expo- 
sition, Norfolk,  Va. 

Appointment  Clerk.  Joseph  B.  Bennett. 

The  Appointment  Clerk  prepares  all  papers  involved  in  the  making  of  appoint- 
ments, transfers,  promotions,  reductions,  details,  furloughs,  and  removals,  for  the 
entire  Department,  and  decides  all  questions  relating  to  the  civil-service  regulations 
affecting  the  same.  He  has  charge  of  all  correspondent'"  of  the  Department  with  the 
Civil  Service  Commission,  and  of  all  certifications  and  communications  issued  by  the 
Commission  to  the  Department;  and  he  reports  to  the  Commission  all  appointments 
and  other  changes  in  the  service.  He  keeps  the  personal  records  of  all  employees  of 
the  Department,  and  is  custodian  of  their  oaths  of  office  and  efficiency  reports.  He 
is  also  custodian  of  the  Department  seal. 

Solicitor,  George  P.  McCabe. 

The  Solicitor  acts  as  the  legal  adviser  of  the  Secretary,  and  is  charged  with  the 
preparation  and  supervision  of  all  legal  papers  to  which  the  Department  is  a  party, 
and  of  all  communications  to  the  Department  of  Justice  and  to  the  various  officers 
thereof,  including  United  States  attorneys.  He  examines  and  approves,  in  advance 
of  issue,  all  orders  and  regulations  promulgated  by  the  Secretary  under  statutory 
authority;  represents  the  Department  in  all  legal  proceedings  arising  under  the  vari- 
ous laws  intrusted  to  the  Department  for  execution,  and  prosecutes  applications  of 
employees  of  the  Department  for  patents.  He  is  also  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Food 
and  Drug  Inspection. 

«  The  organization  of  the  Department  here  given  is  in  accordance  with  the  act 
approved  March  4,  1907,  making  appropriations  for  the  fiscal  year  ending  June  30, 
1908,  and  shows  changes  in  personnel  to  April  1,  1907. 

453 


454  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Chief  of  Supply  Division.  Cyrus  B.  Lower. 

The  Supply  Division  has  charge  of  purchases  of  supplies  and  materials  paid  for 
from  the  general  funds  of  the  Department. 

Weather  Bureau  (corner  Twenty-fourth  and  M  Btreete  NW.). — Chief,  Willis  L. 
Moore;  Assistant  Chief,  Henry  E.  Williams:  Chief  Clerk,  Daniel  J.  Carroll:  Editor  of 
M<>,dhly  Weather  Review,  Cleveland  Abbe:  In  charge  of  Division  of  Meteorological 
Records,  Frank  II.  Bigelow;  In  charge  of  Instrument  Division.  Charles  F.  Marvin; 
In  charge  of  Forecast  Division.  Edward  B.  Garriott;  In  charge  of  Special  Research  and 
Forecaster.  Alfred  J.  Henry:  In  charge  of  River  and  Flood  Service  and  Forecast"-, 
Harry  C.  Frankenfield;  In  charge  of  Weather  Bureau  accounts.  Edgar  B.  Calvert. 
Chiefs  of  Division:  Climatological.  James  Berry:  Publications.  John  P.  Church: 
Telegraph,  Jesse  H.  Robinson:  Ocean  Meteorology,  James  Page:  Supplies,  Frank  M. 
Cleaver:  Librarian.  Herbert  H.  Kimball. 

The  Weather  Bureau  has  charge  of  the  forecasting  of  weather;  the  issue  of  storm 
warnings:  the  display  of  weather  and  flood  signals  for  the  benefit  of  agriculture 
commerce,  and  navigation;  the  gaging  and  reporting  of  river  stages:  the  maintenance 
and  operation  of  Beacoast  telegraph  lines,  and  the  collection  and  transmission  of 
marine  intelligence  for  the  benefit  of  commerce  and  navigation:  the  reporting  of  tem- 
perature and  rainfall  conditions  for  the  cotton,  rice,  sugar,  and  other  interests:  the 
display  of  frost  and  cold-wave  signals:  the  distribution  of  meteorological  information 
in  the  interests  of  agriculture  and  commerce:  and  the  taking  of  such  meteorological 
observations  as  may  be  necessary  to  establish  and  record  the  climatic  conditions  of 
the  United  States,  or  are  essential  for  the  proper  execution  of  the  foregoing  duties. 

Bureau  of  Animal  Industry. — Chief,  A.  D.  Melvin;  Assistant  Chief,  A.  M.  Farring- 
ton;  Chief  Clerk,  F.  B.Jones;  Chief  of  Inspection  Division,  Rice  P.  Steddom;  Chief 
of  Quarantine  Division,  Richard  W.  Hickman:  Chief  of  Pathological  Division,  John 
R.  Mahler;  Chief of Bioehemic  Division.  M.  Dorset:  Chief  of  Dairy  Division.  Ed.  H. 
Webster:  Chief  of  Division  of  Zoology .  B.  H.  Ransom:  Superintendent  of  Experiment 
Station.  E.  C.  Schroeder;  Animal  Husbandman,  George  M.  Rommel:  Editor. 
James  M.  Pickens. 

The  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  makes  investigations  as  to  the  existence  of  dan- 
gerous communicable  diseases  of  live  stock,  superintends  the  measures  for  their  con- 
trol and  extirpation,  makes  original  investigations  as  to  the  nature  and  prevention  of 
such  diseases,  and  reports  on  the  condition  and  the  means  of  improving  the  animal 
industries  of  the  country.  It  supervises  the  interstate  movement  of  cattle,  and 
inspects  live  stock,  meats,  and  meat-food  products  intended  for  interstate  and  for- 
eign commerce.  It  conducts  feeding  and  breeding  experiments.  It  has  charge  of 
the  inspection  of  import  and  export  animals,  of  the  inspection  of  vessels  fox  the  trans- 
portation of  export  animals,  and  of  the  quarantine  stations  for  imported  animals.  It 
also  has  supervision  of  the  manufacture,  interstate  commerce,  and  export  of  renovated 
butter. 

Bureau  of  Plaxt  Industry. — Pathologist  and  Physiologist,  and  <  kief  Beverly  T. 
Calloway:  Pathologist  and  Physiologist,  and  Assistant  Chief,  Albert  F.  Woods:  Chief 
Clerk,  James  E.  Jones:  Editor.  J.  E.  Rockwell;  Pathologist  in  charge  of  Laboratory  of 
Plant  Pathology.  Erwin  F.  Smith;  Pathologist  in  charge  of  Investigations  of  I>iseases 
of  Fruits,  Merton  B.  Waite;  Physiologist  in  charge  of  Plant  Lift  History  Invest 'no- 
tions. Walter  T.  Swingle;  Physiologist  in  charge  of  Cotton  and  Tobacco  bra  ding 
Investigations.  Archibald  D.  Shamel;  Physiologist  in  charm  of  Corn  Breeding  Investi- 
gations, Charles  P.  Hartley;  Physiologist  in  charge  of  Alkali  and  Drought  Resistant 
Plant  Binding  Investigations,  Thomas  H.Kearney;  Physiologist  in  charge  of 
Bacteriology  and  Water  Purification  Investigations,  Karl  F.  Kellerman:  Bionomist  in 
charge  ofBionomic  Investigations  of  Tropical  and  Subtropical  Plants,  ('rat  or  F.  Cook; 
Physiologist  in  charge  of  Drug  and  Poisonous  Plant  Investigations  and  ]'<a  ('■ 
Investigations.  Rodney  H.  True:  Physicist  in  charge  of  Physical  Laboratory.  Lyman 
J.  Briggs;  Expert  in  ehargt  of  (rop  Technology  Investigations,  Nathan  A.  Cobb; 
Botanist  in  charge  of  Taxonomic  Investigations,  Frederick  V.  Coville:  Agriculturist 
in  charge  of  Farm  Management  Investigations,  William  J.  Spillman;  Crrealist  in  charge 
of  Grain  Investigations,  Mark  A.  Carleton;  Horticulturist  in  charge  of  Arlington 
Experimental  Farm.  LeeC.  Corbett;  Pathologist  i/t  ehargt  of  Sugar  Beet  Investigations, 
Charles  0.  Townsend;  Agriculturist  in  charge  of  Western  Agricultural  Extension 
Investigations.  Carl  S.  Sco field;  Agriculturist  in  charge  of  Dry  Land  Agriculture 
Investigations.  E.  Charming  Chileott;  Pomologist  in  charge  of Pomological  Collections, 
Gustavus  B.  Bracken;  Pomologists  in  charge  of  Field  Investigations  in  Pomology. 
William  A.Taylor  and  G.Harold  Powell;  Superintendent  of  Experimental  Gardens 


ORGANIZATION    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT.  455 

and  Grounds,  Edward  M.  Byrnes;  Superintendent  of  Vegetable  Testing  Gardens,  W.  W 


charge  of  Seed  Laboratory,  Edgar  Brown;  Expert  in  charge  of  Grain  Standard  i :a/ion, 
John  D.  Shanahan;  Pathologist  in  charge  of  Subtropical  Laboratory  and  Garden, 
Miami,  Fla.,  Ernst  A.  Bessey;  Expert  m  charge  of  Plant  Introduction  Garden,  Chico, 
Cal.,  August  Mayer:  Pomologist  in  charge  of  South  Texas  Garden,  Brownsville,  Tex., 
Edward  ('.  Orcein;  Special  Agent  in  charge  of  Cotton  Culture  Farms,  Seaman  A. 
Knapp,  Lake  Charles,  La. 

The  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  studies  plant  life  in  all  its  relations  to  agriculture.  Its 
work  is  classified  under  the  general  subjects  of  Pathological  Investigations,  Physiolog- 
ical Investigations,  Taxonomic  Investigations,  Agronomic  Investigations.  Horticul- 
tural Investigations,  and  Seed  and  Plant  Introduction  Investigations. 

Forest  Service  (Atlantic  Building,  928-930  F  street  NW.). — Forester  and  Chief, 
Gifford  Pinchot;  Associate  Fo rcsta;  Overton  W.  Price;  Lair  Ofivr,  P.  P.  Wells; 
Editor,  Herbert  A.  Smith;  Dcndrologist,  George  B.  Sudworth;  Branch  of  Grazing, 
Assistant  Forester  in  Charge,  Albert  F.  Potter  ;  Branch  of  Opt  ration.  Assistant  For- 
ester in  Charge,  James  B.  Adams;  Chief,  Office  of  Maintenance,  Hermon  C.  Metealf; 
Fiscal  Agent  anil  Chief,  Office  of  Accounts,  George  E.  King;  Chief  Of  ice  if  Organiza- 
tion, C.  S.  Chapman;  Assistant  Chief,  Office  of  Organization.  Clyde  Leavitt;  Chief, 
Office  of  Engineering,  W.  E.  Herring;  Chief,  Office  of  Lands,  George  F.  Pollock; 
Branch  of  Silnrulture,  Assistant  Forester  in  Charge,  William  T.  Cox;  Chief,  Office 
of  Extension,  Samuel  N.  Spring;  Chief,  Office  of  Silcics,  Raphael  Zon;  Chief.  Qffiee 
of  Mimuiji in  nil,  E.  E.  Carter;  Assistant  Chief,  Office  of  Management,  W.  O.  Weigle: 
Branch  of  Produces — Assistant  Forester  in  Charge,  William  L.  Hall;  Chief,  Office  of 
Wood  Utilizatio7i,R.  S.  Kellogg;  Chief,  Office  of  Wood  Prrser  rat  ion,  O  O.  Crawford; 
Chief,  Office  of  Publication,  Findley  Bums. 

The  Forest  Service  has  charge  of  the  administration  of  the  National  forests,  and  con- 
ducts examinations  on  the  public  lands  to  determine  the  propriety  of  making  changes 
in  the  boundaries  of  existing  National  forests  and  of  withdrawing  other  areas  suitable 
for  new  forests;  gives  practical  assistance  in  the  conservative  handling  of  State  and  pri- 
vate forest  lands;  investigates  methods  of  planting  and  kinds  of  trees  for  planting,  and 
gives  practical  assistance  to  tree  planters;  studies  commercially  valuable  trees  to  deter- 
mine the  best  means  of  using  and  reproducing  them;  tests  the  strength  and  durability 
of  construction  timbers,  railroad  ties,  and  poles,  and  determines  the  best  methods  of 
extending  their  life  through  preservative  treatment;  and  studies  forest  tires,  the  effects 
of  grazing  on  forest  land,  turpentine  orcharding,  and  other  forest  problems. 

Bureau  of  Chemistry  (corner  Fourteenth  and  B  streets  SW.). — Chemist  and  Chief, 
Harvey  W.  Wiley;  Board  of  Food  and  Drug  Inspection,  11.  W.Wiley,  F.  L.  Dun- 
lap. andG.  P. McCains  Chief  of  Division  of  Foods,  W.  D.Bigelow;:  Chiefs  of  Food  and 
Drug  Inspection  Laboratories :  New  York,  R.  E.  Doolittle;  Philadelphia,  C.  S.  Brin- 
ton;  Boston,  B.  H.  Smith:  Chicago,  A.  L.  Winton;  New  Orleans,  C.  W.  Harrison; 
San  Francisco,  R.  A.  Gould;  St.  Paul,  A.  S.  Mitchell;  Chief  of  Sugar  Laboratory, 
C.  A.  Browne,  jr.;  Chief  of  Miscellaneous  Laboratory,  J.  K.  Haywood;  Chief  of  I)  airy 
Laboratonj,  G.  E.  Patrick;  CMef  of  Plant  Analysis  Laboratory,  C.  C.  Moore;  Chief 
of  Drug  Laboratory,  L.  F.  Kebler;  Chief  of  Contracts  Laboratory,  P.  H.  Walker; 
Chief  of  Li  other  and  Paper  Laboratory,  F.  P.  Veitch;  Chief  of  Micro-chemical  Labora- 
tory. B.  J.  Howard;   Chief  Clerk,  M.  T.  Read. 

The  Bureau  of  Chemistry  investigates  methods  proposed  for  the  analysis  of  plants, 
fertilizers,  and  agricultural  products,  and  makes  such  analyses  as  pertain  in  general 
to  the  interests  of  agriculture.  The  work  on  foods  includes  the  analysis  of  adulterated 
products,  experiments  to  determine  the  effect  of  adulterants  on  the  human  organism, 
the  investigation  of  food  products  imported  into  the  Ignited  States,  and  the  examina- 
tion of  foods  and  drugs  in  accordance  with  the  Food  and  Drugs  Act,  June  30,  19()(j. 
The  Bureau  does  chemical  work  for  some  of  the  other  Bureaus  and  Divisions  of  the 
Department,  and  for  other  Departments  of  the  Government  which  apply  to  the  Secre- 
tary of  Agriculture  for  such  assistance. 

Bureaf  of  Soils  (2(>S  214  Thirteenth  street  SW.).— Chief ',  Milton  Whitney;  CMef 
Clerk,  A.  (i.  Rice;  In  charge  of  Soil  Laboratories.  Frank  K.  Cameron;  In  charge  of 
Soil  Sii/T()/,  Jay  A.  Honsteel;  In  charge  of  Alkali  Reclamation  Investigations.  Clarence 
W.  Dorsey;   In  charge  of  Tobacco  Investigations,  George  T.  McNess;   In  charge  of 


456  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Soil  Management,  Frank  D.  Gardner;   Tn  charge  of  Fertility  Investigations,  Oswald 
Srhreiner. 

The  Bureau  of  Soils  is  intrusted  with  the  investigation,  survey,  and  mapping  of  soils; 
the  investigation  of  the  cause  and  prevention  of  the  rise  of  alkali  in  the  soil,  and  the 
drainage  of  soils;  and  the  investigation  of  the  methods  of  growing,  curing,  and  fermen- 
tation of  tobacco  in  the  different  tobacco  districts. 

Bureau  of  Entomology. — Entomologist  and  Chief,  L.  O.  Howard;  Entomologist  and 
Acting  Chief  in  absence  of  Chief,  C.  L.  Marlatt ;  Chief  Clerk,  R.  S.  Clifton;  In  charge  of 
Breeding  Experiments,  F.  H.  Chittenden;  In  charge  of  Forest  Insect  Investigations, 
A.  D.  Hopkins;  In  charge  of  Cotton  Boll  Weevil  Investigations,  W.  D.  Hunter;  In 
charge  of  Cereal  and  Forage-plant  Insect  Investigations,  F.  M.  Webster;  In  charge  of 
Deciduous-fruit  Insect  Investigations,  A.  L.  Quaintance;  In  charge  of  Apicultural  In- 
vestigations, E.  F.  Phillips;  In  charge  of  Gipsy  and  Brown-tail  Moth  Work,  D.  M.  Rog- 
ers; Engaged  in  White  Fly  Investigations,  A.  W.  Morrill;  In  charge  of  Gipsy  Moth 
Laboratory,  E.  S.  G.  Titus;  Engaged  in  Silk  Investigations,  C.  J.  Gilliss;  Assistant  in 
charge  of  Editorial  Work,  R.  P.  Currie;   Librarian,  Mabel  Colcord. 

The  Bureau  of  Entomology  obtains  and  disseminates  information  regarding  injurious 
insects  affecting  Held  crops,  fruits,  small  fruits,  truck  crops,  forests  and  forest  products, 
and  stored  products;  studies  insects  in  relation  to  diseases  of  man  and  other  animals  and 
as  animal  parasites;  experiments  with  the  introduction  of  beneficial  insects  and  with 
the  fungous  and  other  diseases  of  insects;  and  conducts  experiments  and  tests  with 
insecticides  and  insecticide  machinery.  It  is  further  charged  with  investigations  in 
apiculture  and  sericulture.  The  information  gained  is  disseminated  in  the  form  of 
general  reports,  bulletins,  and  circulars.  Museum  work  is  done  in  connection  with  the 
Division  of  Insects  of  the  National  Museum,  and  insects  are  identified  for  experiment 
stations  and  other  public  institutions  and  for  private  individuals. 

Bureau  op  Biological  Survey. — Biologist  and  Chief,  C.  Hart  Merriam;  Administra- 
tive Assistant  and  Acting  Chief  in  absence  of  Chief,  H.  W.  Henshaw;  Assistant  in 
charge  of  Economic  Investigations,  A.  K.  Fisher;  Assistant  in  charge  of  Game  Preserva- 
tion, T.  S.  Palmer;   Assistant  in  charge  of  Geographic  Distribution,  Vernon  Bailey. 

The  Bureau  of  Biological  Survey  studies  the  geographic  distribution  of  animals  and 
plants,  and  maps  the  natural  life  zones  of  the  country ;  it  also  investigates  the  economic 
relations  of  birds  and  mammals,  and  recommends  measures  for  the  preservation  of 
beneficial  and  the  destruction  of  injurious  species.  It  is  charged  with  carrying  into 
effect  the  provisions  of  the  Federal  law  for  the  supervision  of  interstate  commerce  in 
game  and  the  importation  and  protection  of  birds,  and  certain  provisions  of  the  law  for 
the  protection  of  game  in  Alaska. 

Division  of  Accounts  and  Disbursements. — Chief  and  Disbursing  Clerk,  A.  Zap- 
pone;  Assistant  Chief,  Edgar  B.  Calvert;  Auditor,  Everett  D.  Yerby;  Cashier, 
M.  E.  Fagan. 

The  Division  of  Accounts  and  Disbursements  audits,  adjusts,  and  pays  all  accounts 
and  claims  against  the  Department;  decides  questions  involving  the  expenditure  of 
public  funds;  prepares  advertisements  and  schedules  for  annual  supplies  and  letters 
of  authority;  writes,  for  the  signature  of  the  Secretary,  all  letters  to  the  Treasury 
Department  pertaining  to  fiscal  matters;  issues  requisitions  for  the  purchase  of  sup- 
plies and  requests  for  passenger  and  for  freight  transportation;  prepares  the  annual 
estimates  of  appropriations,  and  transacts  all  other  business  relating  to  the  financial 
interests  of  the  Department. 

Division  of  Publications. — Editor  and  Chief.  Geo.  Wm.  Hill;  Editor  and  Assistant 
Chief,  Joseph  A.  Arnold;  Associate  Editor,  B.  D.  Stallings;  Assistant  in  charge  of 
Document  Section,  R.  B.  Handy;  Chief  Clerk,  A.  I.  Mudd;  Assistant  in  charge  of 
Indexing,  Charles  II.  Greathouse;  Assistant  in  charge  of  Illustrations,  Louis  S. 
Williams. 

The  Division  of  Publications  exercises  general  supervision  of  the  Department  print- 
ing and  illustrations,  edits  all  publications  of  the  Department  (with  the  exception  of 
those  of  the  Weather  Bureau),  has  charge  of  the  printing  and  Farmers'  Bulletin  funds, 
and  distributes  all  Department  publications  with  the  exception  of  those  issued  by  the 
Weather  Bureau  and  those  turned  over  by  law  to  the  Superintendent  of  Documents 
for  sale  at  the  price  affixed  by  him.  It  issues,  in  the  form  of  press  notices,  official 
information  of  interest  to  agriculturists,  and  distributes  to  agricultural  publications 


ORGANIZATION    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT.  457 

and  writer?  notice?  and  synopses  of  Department  publication?,  and  has  charge  of  all 
correspondence -with  the  Government  Printing  Office. 

Bureau  of  Statistics. — Statistician  and  Chief,  Victor  II.  Olmsted;  Associate  Statis- 
tician. C.  C.  Clark:  Assistant  Statistician.  Sal  C.  Murray:  Chief  Clerk,  E.  J.  Lundy: 
Chief  of  Division   of  Foreign    Marlats.   George  K.   Holme?:    Chief  of  Division    of 

Domestic  Crop  lit  ports.  F.  J.  Blair:  Crop  Reporting  Board:  Victor  H.  Olmsted, 
Charles  C.  (lark.  Nat  C.  Murray,  George  K.  Holme?,  and  one  member  selected  from 
month  to  month  from  the  corps  of  field  agent?  and  of  State  statistical  agents. 

The  Statistician  collect?  information  as  to  the  condition,  production,  etc..  vi  the 
principal  crops  and  the  status  of  farm  animals  through  State  agents,  each  of  whom 
-  --isted  by  a  corps  of  local  reporters,  through  separate  corps  of  county,  township. 
and  cotton  correspondents,  through  traveling  agents,  and  through  a  special  foreign 
correspondent,  assisted  by  consular,  agricultural,  and  commercial  authorities.  He 
record?,  tabulates,  and  coordinates  statistics  of  agricultural  production,  distribution, 
and  consumption,  the  authorized  data  of  governments,  institutes,  societies,  boards 
of  trade,  and  individual  experts:  prepares  special  statistical  bulletins  upon  domestic 
and  foreign  agricultural  subjects,  and  i??ue?  a  monthly  crop  report  for  the  information 
of  producer?  and  consumers.  Special  bulletins  are  published  giving  information  of 
domestic  and  f  >reign  trade  and  of  the  conditions  under  which  foreign  trade  may  be 
extended.  Investigations  are  made  of  land  tenures,  cost  of  producing  farm  products, 
country-life  education,  transportation,  and  other  lines  of  rural  economic?. 

Library. — Librarian.  Josephine  A.  Clark:  Assistant  Librarian.  Claribel  R.  Barnett. 

The  Librarian  has  charge  of  the  Library  and  supervise?  the  arrangement  and  cata- 
S    Log  of  bonk?,  the  preparation  of  bibliographic?  and  similar  publications,  and  the 
purchase  of  new  books.     The  mailing  lists  for  the  distribution  of  Department  publi- 
cations to  foreign  countries  are  under  the  supervision  of  the  Librarian. 

Office  of  Experiment  Stations. — Director.  A.  C.  True:  Assistant  Director  and  Editor 
of  Experiment  station  Record,  E.  W.  Allen:  Chief  of  Editorial  Division,  W.  H.  Beal: 

f  pf  Division  Stations,  W.  H.  Evans;    Special  Agent,  Alaska,  < 

GeorgesoD :  S pedal  Agt  nt,  Hawaii.  Jared  G.  Smith:  Special  Ag>  nt,  T'orto  Rico.  D.  W. 
May:  Chief  of  Nutrition  Investigations.  ('.  F.  Langworthy;  Chief  of  Irrigation -and 
Drai7iage  Livestigatioiis.  Elwood  Mead:  Fanners'  Institute  Specialist.  John  Hamilton: 
E  pert  in  Agricultural  Education.  D.  J.  Crosby:    Chi<f  Clerk.  Mrs.  C.  E.  Johnston. 

The  Office  of  Experiment  Station?  represents  the  Department  in  its  relation  to  the 
experiment  stations,  which  are  now  in  operation  in  all  the  States  and  Territories,  and 
directly  manages  the  experiment  stations  in  Alaska.  Porto  Rico,  and  Hawaii.  It 
seeks  to  promote  the  interest?  of  agricultural  education  and  inve?tigation  throughout 
the  United  States.  It  collects  and  disseminates  general  information  regarding  agri- 
cultural schools,  colleges,  and  stations,  and  publishes  accounts  of  agricultural  inves- 
tigations at  home  and  abroad.  It  also  indicate?  line?  of  inquiry  for  the  stations,  aids 
in  the  conduct  of  cooperative  experiments,  reports  upon  their  expenditures  and  work, 
and  in  general  furnishes  them  with  such  advice  and  assistance  as  will  best  promote 
the  purposes  for  which  they  were  established.  In  a  similar  way  it  aids  in  the  devel- 
opment of  the  farmers"  institutes  throughout  the  United  States.  It  is  charged  with 
investigations  on  the  nutritive  value  and  economy  of  human  foods.  It  conducts 
investigations  of  the  laws  and  institutions  relating  to  irrigation  in  different  regions, 
the  use  of  irrigation  waters,  the  removal  of  seepage  and  surplus  waters  by  drainage, 
and  the  use  of  different  kinds  of  power  and  machinery  for  irrigation  and  other  agricul- 
tural purp  - 

Office  of  Public  Roads. — Director.  Logan  Waller  Page:  Assistajit  Director.  Allerton 
S.  Cushman;  Chief  Engineer,  Vernon  M.  Peirce:  Chief  of  Records,  Maurice  0. 
Eldrid-^e:  Testing  Engineer,  Philip  L.  Wormeley.  jr.:  Chief  Clerk,  James  Edmund 
Pennybacker.  jr. 

The  Office  of  Public  Roads  collects  and  disseminates  information  concerning  sys- 
tem? of  road  management  throughout  the  United  State?:  conducts  investigations  and 

experiments  regarding  road-building  material?  and  methods  of  mad  construction; 
makes  chemical  and  physical  test?  of  road  material?  and  material?  of  con?truction 
relating  to  agriculture:  gives  expert  advice  on  road  admini?tration  and  road  con- 
struction: demonstrate?  the  best  methods  of  construction,  and  prepares  publications 
on  these  subjects. 


458 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


APPROPRIATIONS  FOR  THE  DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE  FOR 
THE  FISCAL  YEARS  ENDING  JUNE   30,  1905,  1906.  AND    1907. 


Object  of  appropriation. 


1905. 


1907- 


Salaries,  Department  of  Agriculture 

Library.  Department  of  Agricultur- 

Contingent  Expenses.  Department  of  Agriculture 

Collecting  Agricultural  Statistics 

Bureau  of  Plant  Industry,  General  Expenses 

Botanical  Investigations  and  Experiments 

Entomological  Investigations 

Vegetable  Pathological  Investigations 

Grai:.  s      .   ns,  1906 

Rent  of  quarters.  Plant  Bureau  (deficiency  act   

Biological  Invest:.:    " 

Pomoiogical  Investigations 

Laboratory,  Department  of  Agriculture 

-  •  tions 

Nat;  Administration,  etc..  1S07  and  1908 

Wichita  Forest  and  Game  Preserve 

Survey  and   Report,   Appalachian  and   White  Mountain 

Watersheds,  1907  and  1908 

.g  Timbers,  Louisiana  Purchase  Exposition.  St.  Louis. 
Mo.  (deficiency  act ; 

Experimental  Gardens  and  Grounds.  Department  of  Agri- 
culture   

Soil  Investigations 

Grass  and  Forage  Plant  In ve stigations 

Greenhouses,  Department  of  Agriculture.  1904-i'-> •" 

Agricultural  Experiment  Stations  [for  stations  under  Hatch 
and  Adams  acts;  1810,000,  1905;  $794,660.  ISO  • 


10.000.09 
37.000.00 
139. 500. 00 


37.000.00 


67.500.00 
70.000.00 


63. 840.00 

- 
155.640.00 
25.000.00 


10.000.00 

37.000.00 

"  112.900.00 

_  .ia.  :>> 

307.500.00 


2.50000 

34.000.00 

43.500.00 

135.000.00 

388.000.00 


44. 420.  00 

- 
793. 180. 00 


;. 

4  395. 930. 00 

902. 210. 82 

1.052.500.00 

15.000.00 

-      00.00 


16  MX  Of 

25.000.00 
170.000.00 
42.500.00 
35    00.0 


20.320.00 
170.000.00 


1907}- 


Nutrition  Investigations 

Public  Road  Inquiries 

Cotton  Boll  Investigatior  s 

Publications,  Department  of  Agriculture 

Sugar  Investigations 

Purchase  and  Distribution  of  Valuable  Seed- 

a  and  Expenses.  Bureau  of  Animal  Industrv 

Ticks.  1907  and  1908 

Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  (deficiency  act   

Irrigation  Investigations.*. 

Tea  Culture  Investigations 

Arlington  Experimental  Farm 

Building,  Department  of  Agricultur- 


.    BOB  H 

20,00ft  • 

35.000.00 

250.000.00 

210.000.00 

7.500.00 

290.000.00 


"- 

20.000.00  i 

: 

190.000.00 

/ 132. 250. 00 

7.500.00 

242.930.00 


-      '.0.00     1.456.538. 00 


67.  .500. 00 
10,000.00 

20.000.00 
250.000.00 


.  .  00.00 
74.500.00 
8.500.00 
20,000.00 
950.000.00 


1S5.000.00 


-:5.  or. 

20.000.00 

230.000.00 
S  132. 250. 00 
M 

3.946.980.00 
107.500.00 

':.  -  ■ 
-■ 


4.'00.>SOO.OO     5.719.700.00 


TVEATHEE   BtTBEAC. 


Salaries,  Weather  Bureau 

Fuel,  Lights,  and  Repairs.  Weather  Bureau... 

Contingent  Expenses,  Weather  Bureau 

General  Expenses,  Weather  Bureau 

Buildings.  Weatb  

:  Land  Lines,  Weather  Bureau 

Salaries,  Station  Employees,  Weather  Bureau. 


ISO,  44).  00 
.    ..     . 

10.000.00 
1.064.300.00 

27    «T0. 00 


191.340.00 
10.000.00 
10.000.00 
1.093.  .565. 00 
53.000.00 
35.000.00 


£94,690.00 

•  •■  ..-.,r, 

i  ,009  a 

630.000.00 
53.000.00 

.54i.5oO.00 


Total,  Weather  Bureau. 
total 


1.337.740.00     1.392.990.00 


:j.O0     7.112.690.00 


a  Includes  $4,900  for  Foreign  Markets  Investigations. 

">  Includes  $11,300  for  rent  and  repairs;  $.5,000  for  Ozark  Mountain  investigci-  served 

from  sale  of  fruits  and  vegetables;  also  appropriations  heretofore  made  under  the  names  of  Botanical 

Investigations.  Vegetable    Pathological    Investigations,    Pomoiogical    Investigations.  Experimental 

•.nd  Forage  Plant  Investigations,  Sugar  Investigations.  Tea  Culture 

Investigations,  and  Arlington  Experimental  Farm. 

'Included  under  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

&  Includes  $300,000  for  enforcement  of  Food  and  Drugs  Act. 

t  Expeus'3  of  Offiesof  Experiment  Stations  and  inc.  5  from  sale  of  Experiment  Station 

card  indexes  in  1S07. 

/  Does  not  include  $300,000  for  the  Yearbook  and  $185,000  in  general  printing  fund. 

a  Does  not  include  $300,000  in  general  printing  fund. 


INSTITUTIONS    FOR    AGRICULTURAL    EDUCATION. 


459 


AGRICULTURAL    COLLEGES    AND    OTHER    INSTITUTIONS    IN 
UNITED  STATES  HAVING  COURSES  IN  AGRICULTURE. « 


THE 


College  instruction  in  agriculture  is  given  in  tlie  colleges  and  universities  receiving 
the  benefits  of  the  acts  of  Congress  of  July  2.  1862,  and  August  30.  1890.  which  are 
now  in  operation  in  all  the  Stales  and  Territories,  except  Alaska.  Hawaii,  and  Porto 
Rico.  The  total  number  of  these  institutions  is  65,  of  which  63  maintain  courses  of 
instruction  in  agriculture.  In  21  States  the  agricultural  colleges  are  departments  of 
the  State  universities.  In  15  States  and  Territories  separate  institutions  having 
courses  in  agriculture  are  maintained  for  the  colored  race.  All  of  the  agricultural 
colleges  for  white  persons  and  several  of  those  for  negroes  offer  four-year  courses  in 
agriculture  and  its  related  sciences  leading  to  bachelors'  degrees,  and  many  provide 
for  graduate  study.  About  55  of  these  institutions  also  provide  special,  short,  and 
correspondence  courses  in  the  different  branches  of  agriculture,  including  agronomy, 
h<  >rt  iculture.  animal  husbandry,  p  >ultry  raising,  cheese  making,  dairying,  sugar  making, 
rural  engineering,  farm  mechanics,  and  other  technical  subjects.  The  officers  of  the 
agricultural  colleges  engage  quite  largely  in  conducting  farmers'  institutes  and  various 
other  forms  of  college  extension.  The  agricultural  experiment  station-  with  very  few 
exceptions  are  departments  of  the  agricultural  colleges.  The  total  number  of  persons 
engaged  in  the  work  of  education  and  research  in  the  land-grant  colleges  and  the 
experiment  stations  in  1906  was  5.<;:>7:  the  number  of  students  in  these  colleges,  63,471 ; 
the  number  of  students  (white)  in  the  four-year  college  courses  in  agriculture.  2.770; 
in  short  and  special  courses,  4,764.  There  were  also  1.70 8  students  in  agriculture  in 
the  separate  institutions  for  negroes.  With  a  few  exceptions,  each  oi  these  colleges 
offers  free  tuition  to  residents  of  the  State  in  which  it  is  located.  In  the  excepted 
i  ases  scholarships  are  open  to  promising  and  energetic  students:  and.  in  all.  opportu- 
nities are  found  for  some  to  earn  part  of  their  expenses  by  their  own  labor.  The 
expenses  are  from  $125  to  $300  for  the  school  year. 

Ag  icultural  colleges  and  other  institutions  in  the  I  nited  States  havvrJ)  courses  in  agriculture. 


State  or  Territory. 


of  institution. 


Location. 


President. 


Alabama ' Uabama  Polytechnic  Institute. 

Agricultural    and    Mechanical 
College  for  Negroes. 

Arizona University  of  Arizona 

Arkansas University  of  Arkansas 

California University  of  California 

Colorado The  State  Agricultural  College 

of  Colorado. 

Connecticut Connecticut   Agricultural  Col- 
lege. 

Delaware Delaware  College 

State  College  for  Colored  Stu- 
dents. 

Florida '  University  of  Florida 

Florida  State  Normal  and  In- 
dustrial College. 

Georgia Georgia  State  College  of  Agri- 
culture and  Mechanic  Arts. 
Georgia  State  Industrial  Col- 
lege. 

Idaho I  niversity  of  Idaho 


Auburn.  . 
Normal.. 


Tucson 

Fayette  vitte 

Berkelev 

Fort  Collins 


Storrs. 


Newa  rk . 
Dover. . 


Gainesville.. . 

Tallahassee. . . 


Athens 

Savannah . . . 
Moscow. 


Illinois.. 

Indiana  . 
Iowa 


Kentucky. 


Louisiana. 


University  of  Illinois 

Purdue  University 

Iowa  State  College  of  Agricul- 
ture and  the  Mechanic  Arts. 

Kansas  State  Agricultural  Col- 
lege. 

Agricultural  and  Mechanical 
College  of  Kentucky. 

The  Kentucky  Normal  and  In- 
dustrial Institute  for  Colored 
Persons. 

Louisiana  State  University  and 
Agricultural  and  Mechanical 
College. 

Southern  University  and  Ag- 
ricultural and  Mechanical 
lege. 


Urbane . . . 
Lafayette. 

Ames 


Manhattan. . . 

Lexington 

Frankfort 


C.  C.  Thach.  LL.  D. 
W.  11.  Councill,  Ph.  D. 

K.  C.  Bahcock.  Ph.  D. 
.T.  N.  Tillman,  B.  LL. 
B.  I.  Wheeler.  Ph.  D..LL.  D. 
15.  <).  Avlesworth,  LL.  D., 

Litt.  D. 
R.  W.  Stimson.  A.  M. 

G.  A.  llarter.  Ph.  D. 
W.  C.  Jason,  M.  A. 

Andrew  Sledd,  Ph.  D..LL.D. 
N.  B.  Young.  M.  A. 

II.  ('.  White.  Ph.  D..LL.D. 

R.  R.  Wright,  LL.  D. 

J.    A.    MacLean,    Ph.    D., 

LL.  D. 
E..1.  .Tames.  Ph.  D.,  LL.  D. 
W.  E.  Stone.  Ph.  D. 
A.  B.  Storms.  D.  D..  LL.  D. 


E.  R.Nichols.  A.  M. 

J.    K.    Patterson,    Ph.    D., 

LL.  D. 
J.S.IIaihawav.  M.  A..M.  D. 


Baton  Rouge T.  D.  Boyd,  LL.  D. 

New  Orleans II.  A.  Hill. 


a  Including  only  institutions  established  under  the  land-grant  art  of  Jury  2.  1862. 


460 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


ether    institutions   in    the    United   States    having  courses   in 
agriculture — Continued. 


State  or  Territory. 


:'  institution. 


Location. 


President. 


Maine 

Maryland 

I 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississippi 

:ri 

Montana 

^ka 

la 



Mexico 



■ 


North  I 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

I  vania . . 
I  sland . . 

South  < 


South  Dakota. 




Verm'  : 
Virginia 

-" 
West  Virginia. 

Wiaoox 

Wyoming 


The  University  of  Maine 

nd  Agricultural  College 
Princess  Anne  Academy.  East- 
ern Branch.  Md.  Agr"  Coll. 
Massachusetts  Agricultural  Col- 
- 
Michigan   State    Agricultural 

College. 
The  University  of  Minnesota .. . 
ppi    Agricultural    and 
Mechanical  College. 
Alcorn   Agricultural  and   Me- 
chanic 

ihe  V:  Missouri 

n  Institute 

The  Mont  gc 

culture  and  Mechanic  Arts. 
The  D  .ska... : 

iversity 

The  New  Hampshire  College  of 
Agriculture  and  the  Mechanic 
Arts. 

.    rs  Scientific  School,  the 
Jersey  State  College  for 
the  Benefit  of  Agriculture  and 
the  Mechanic  Arts. 
The  New  Mexico  College  of  Ag- 
riculture and  Mechanic  Arts. 

.  University 

The  North  Carolina  College  of 
Agriculture     and     Mechanic- 
Arts. 
The  Agricultural  and  Mechan- 
ical College  for  the  Colored 
- 
North  Dakota  Agricultural  Col- 
lege. 
Ohio  State  University 

ma     Agricultural    and 

j.anical  Co;    j> 
Agricultural  and  Xormi.. 

Oregon  State  Agricultural  Col- 

The  Pennsylvania  Sta( 
Rhod<    I  .       :'  Agri- 

culture and  Mechanic  Arts. 
Clemson  Agricultural  College  of 

Sout  b 
The   Colored    Normal.    Indus- 
trial. Agricultural,  and  Me- 
chanical   '         -  South 
ina. 

rri  -ultural  Col- 
- 

:  T-'T.nessee 

Agricultural    and    Meci. 

-■ 
Prairi-  Normal  and 

Industrial  College. 
The    Agricultural    Col'.  » 
Utah. 

rmont    and 
Stat 
The  Virginia  Agricultu- 
Miy/hanica!  College  and  Poly- 
•;Tute. 
The  Hampton  Normal  and  Ag- 
ricultural Insti: 
The  State  College  of  Washing- 

ty 

The  West  Virginia  Colored  In- 
stitute. 

:"  Wyoming 


Orono 

College  Park 

Princess  Anne 

Amherst 

Agricultural  Col- 
lege. 

St.  Anthony  Park 

Agricultural  Col- 
lege. 

Lorman 

Columbia 

Jefferson  City. .  .. 
Bozeman 

Lincoln 

Reno 

Durham 


New  Brunswick  . 


G.  E.  Fallows,  Ph.  D..  LL.D. 
R.  W.  Silvester.  M.  .-. 
F.  Trigg.  M.  A. 

K.  L.  Butterfield.  A.  M. 

J.  L.  Snyder.  Ph.  D. 

C.  Northrop.  LL.  D. 
J.  C.  Hardy.  LL.  D. 

L.  J.  Rowan.  B.  S. 

R.  H.  Jesse.  LL.  D. 
B.  F.  Allen.  LL.  D. 
J.  M.  Hamilton,  M.  S. 

E.  B.  Andrews.  LL.  D. 
J.  E.  Stubbs.  D.D..LL.  D. 
W.  D.  Gibbs.  M.  S. 


W.  II.  S.  Demarest. 


Agricultural  Col-     Luther  Foster.  M.  S.  A 
lege. 

Ithaca 

West  Raleigh 


Greensboro.. 


Agricultural  Col- 
lege. 
Columl   . 


J.G.Schurman.  B.Sc.LL.D. 
G»T.  Winston.  LL.  D. 


Still  water...- 

I         J    I    ID 



:lege.  ... 



Clemson  College  . 
Orangeburg 

Brookings 

Knoxville 

College  E 

Prairie  View 

Logan 

Burlington 

;rg 

Hampton 

Pullman 


Morgantown. 
"  .ie 


Laramie. 


J.  B.  Dudley.  LL.  D. 

J.  n.  Worst,  LL.  D. 

W.    O.    Thompson,   D.   D., 

LL.D. 
A.  C.  Scott.  LL.  M. 

I.  E.  Page,  M.  A. 

T.  M.  Gatch.  Ph.  D. 

J.  A.  Beaver. 

Howard  Edwards,  LL.  I>. 

P.  H.  Mell.  Ph.  D..LL.  D. 

T.  E.  Miller.  LL.  D. 


R.  L.  Slagle.  Ph.  D. 

Brown  Avres.  Ph.  D..  LL.  D. 
H.  II.  Harrington.  LL.  D. 

E.  L.  Bla<?kshear. 

W.  T.  Kerr.  D.  Sc. 

M.H.Buckham.D.I'..LL.D. 

J.M.McBrydc,Ph.D.,IX-D. 

II.  B.  Frissell.  P.  D..  LL.  D. 

E.  A.  Bryan.  LL.  D. 

D.B.Purinton.Ph.D.  LL.I'. 
J.  Mell.  Jones.  A.  M. 

C.  R.  Van  Hise.  Ph.  D. 

F.  M.  Tisdf  1.  I'h.  D. 


AGRICULTURAL    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS. 


461 


AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIMENT  STATIONS  OF  THE  UNITED  STATES 
THEIR     LOCATIONS,     DIRECTORS,    AND    PRINCIPAL     LINES     OF 

WORK. 


Station,  location,  and  director. 


Alabama  (College),  Auburn: 
J.  F.  Duggar 


Principal  lines  of  work. 


Alabama  (Canebrakei,  Uniontown: 
J.  M.  Kicheson  a 


Alabama  (Tuskegee),  Tuskegee  Insti 
tute: 
0.  W.Carver 


Arizona,  Tucson: 
R.  II.  Forbes. 


Arkansas,  Fayetteville: 
W.  G.  Vincenheller. . 


California.  Berkeley: 
E.  J.  Wicksonft. . 


Colorado,  Fort  Collins: 
L.  <;.  Carpenter 


Connecticut  (State).  New  Haven: 
E.  H.  Jenkins 


Connecticut  (Storrs),  Storrs: 
L.  A.  Clinton 


Delaware.  Newark: 
Harry  Ha v ward. . 


Chemistry;  botany:  soils:  analysis  of  fertilizers  and  food  mate- 
rials: agronomy;  horticulture:  plant  breeding:  diseases  of- 
plants  and  animals:  animal  husbandry;  entomology:  dairy- 
ing. 

Agronomy:  horticulture:  floriculture:  plant  breeding:  diseases 
of  plants  and  animals. 

Agronomy:  horticulture:  diseases  of  plants:  animal  industry; 
poultry  investigations;  dairying. 

Chemistry:  botany;  agronomy;  horticulture;  improvement  of 
ranges;  animal  husbandry;  irrigation. 

Chemistry;  agronomy;  horticulture:  plant  breeding;  diseases 
of  plants  and  animals;  animal  husbandrv;  dairying;  ento- 
mology; poultry  experiments:  nursery  inspection. 

Chemistry;  soils;  bacteriology;  fertilizer  control:  agronomy; 
horticulture,  including  viticulture  and  zvmology;  botany; 
meteorology:  entomology;  animal  husbandrv;"  dairying; 
poultry  experiments:  irrigation  and  drainage:'  silviculture; 
reclamation  of  alkali  lands;  animal  and  plant  pathology; 
nutrition  investigations. 

Chemistry:  meteorology:  agronomy;  horticulture:  forestry: 
plant  breeding:  diseases  of  plants;  animal  husbandrv;  veter- 
inary investigations;  entomology;  irrigation. 

Chemistry;  inspection  of  fertilizers,  foods,  feeding  stulTs.  Bab- 
cock  test  apparatus,  and  nurseries:  diseases  of  plants:  plant 
breeding;  forestry;  agronomy;  entomology. 

Food  and  nutrition  of  man  and  animals:  dairy  bacteriology; 
agronomy:  horticulture:  plant  breeding:  poultry  culture: 
dairying. 


■ Chemistry;  bacteriology;  mycology:  agronomy:  horticulture; 

plant  breeding:  diseases  of  plants  and  animals:  animal  hus- 
_  bandrv;  dairying;  entomologv. 

Florida,  Gainesville: 

P.H.Rolfs Chemistry:   agronomy:  horticulture:  diseases  of  plants;  feed- 

_  ing  experiments:  veterinary  science;  entomologv. 

Georgia,  Experiment: 

M.  V.  Calvin Chemistry:  agronomy;  bacteriology;  horticulture;  plant  breed- 
ing; plant  diseases;  entomology:  animal   husbandrv;  dairy- 
ing. 
Idaho,  Moscow: 

I!.  T.  French Chemistry:   physics:    botany:   agronomy;   horticulture:   plant 

breeding:  diseases  of  plants:  entomology:  animal  husbandry; 
irrigation. 
Illinois,  Urbana: 

E.  Davenport Chemistry;  soil  physics:  bacteriology:  agronomy:  horticulture: 

forestry:  plant  breeding:  diseases  of  plants  and  animals;  ani- 
mal husbandry;  dairying. 
Indiana.  Lafayette: 

Arthur  Goss Chemistry:    soils:    agronomy:    horticulture:    plant  breeding; 

animal  husbandry;  dairying:  diseases  of  plants  and  animals: 
entomology. 
Iowa,  Ames: 

C.  F.  Curtiss Chemistry;  botany;  agronomy;  horticulture:  plant  breeding: 

forestry;    diseases  of   plants:    animal   husbandry;    poultry 
investigations;    dairying;    entomology;    rural     engineering; 
good  roads  investigations. 
Kansas.  Manhattan: 

C  .  \\  .  Burkett Chemistry;    soils;    horticulture:    plant  breeding:    agronomy; 

animal   husbandry:   poultry   experiments:  diseases    of   ani- 
mals; dairying;  entomology;  extermination  of  prairie  dogs 
and  gophers:  irrigation. 
Kentucky.  Lexington: 

M.  A.  Scovell Chemistry:  soils;  inspection  of  fertilizers,  foods,  feeding  stuffs, 

orchards,  and  nurseries:  agronomy:  horticulture;  plant 
breeding;  animal  husbandry:  dairying;  diseases  of  plants; 
entomology;  apiculture. 


"Assistant  director. 


^Acting  director. 


462 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICT/LTURE. 


literal  experiment  stations  of  the  United  States,  their  loeetmm  -    and  pri?i- 

cipal  lines  of  work — <A>ntinu.<l. 


Station,  location,  and  Ml 


Principal  lines  of  work. 


Louisiana  iSugare  Xew  Orleans: 

W.  R.  Dodson Chemistry:  bacterioli  _ 

making:  drainage:  irricv  I 
Louis:  .  Baton  Rouge: 

W.  K.  Dodson Geology:  botany:  bacteriology;  soils:  inspection  of  fertilizers. 

foods,  and  !         _  _        any:  horticulture:  animal  hus- 

bandry: diseases  of  animals;  enton. 
na  '  North),  Calhoun: 

\Y.  R.  Dodson Chembtr;  'ilizers:  agronomy;  horticulture;  animal 

husbandry;  stock  raising;  poultry  experiment  - 
Maine.  Orono: 

C.  I'.  W Is Chemistry  inspection  of  foods  fertilizers  I 

feeding'  st v.:'  -  glass 

patholrgy;    antrft 

entomology. 


Mary:                    E     Park: 
II. .'.  Patterson 


Massachusetts.  Amherst : 
W.  P.  Brooks 


Mictugan.  Agricultural  I 

CD.  Smith 


Minnesota.    St.    Anthony    Park.    St. 
Paul: 
W.  M.  Liggett 


Chemistry;    fertilizers;    agronomy:   horticu  ' 
ing;  diseases  of  plants  and  animals 
try;  poultry  expe: 

Chemistry;   meteorology;  inspection  of  fertilizers,  eon 

feeding  st  in:  •  _  _     nomy; 

horticulture:    diseases  of  plants  and  animals;    animal  hus- 
y;    dairying;  gy;   em  ct  of  electricity  on  plant 

growth. 

Chemistry:    analysis  and  control  of  fertilizers;  bacteri  dogy; 

agronomy:   horticulture:   plant  bn      -    _  ;  plants 

and    animals;     animal  >              ento- 

mol  ■_ 


Chemistry;    soils:    fertilizers;    agronomy;    nortieultux' 

estry;    diseases  off  plant! 

investigations;    -.  ry;  dairy- 

ing; entomology;  farm  ma      -  ■    .    . 

issippi,  Agricultural 

W.  L.  Hutchinson Fertilizers:   agronomy:  horticulture;   biolog  ling: 

animal  husbandry:    dts 

dairying:  enter        .  g  g         ong. 

Missouri  (College),  Colom 

HL  J.  Waters Chemistry:  soil  survey:  botany:  agronomy:  i   :  dis- 

■  i  >f  plants  and  wis 
ing:  dairying;  entomology. 
Missouri  t  Fruit  .  Mountain  Grove: 

Paul  Evans Horticu]: 

Montana.  Bozeman: 

F.  B.  Linfield Chemistry:    meteorology:    botany;    agronomy:    dry  farming; 

horticulture;  animal  husbandry;  poultry 
rying:  entomology:  irrigation  and  drain   _ 
Nebraska,  Lincoln: 

E.  A.  Burnett Chemistry;   botany: 

tore;  plant  and  annuals;  for- 

estry; animal  husbandry;  dairying 
Nevada,  Bene: 

J.E.Stubbs Chemistry:  botany,  soils:  meteorology;   agronomy;  horticul- 
ture; forestry;  pi  g  -    animal  hns- 
jry:  entomology;  irriga* 
New  Hampshire.  Durham: 

TV.  D.  tUTibs Chemistry;   botany:  agronomy:    ' 

forestry;    animal  husbandry 
ing;  entomology. 

Xew  Jersey  i  State   .  Xev;  Brunswick:    Hnemistry;     oyster  culture;     botany; 

E.  B.  voorhei  s [    foods,  and  commercial  f-  .  Domy;    horticul- 

Xew  .'  w  Brunswick:  |     tare;   plant  breeding:    <J.- 

E.  B.  Voorhees I    husbandry;  entomology;  soil  b  i  gal 

Xew  Mexico.  Agricultural  Coll  - 

Luther  Foster Chemistry:   bet  _--  -         _ 

ture;  animal  hue  gy; 

Xew  York  (State  .  Genera: 

W.H.Jordan Chemistry:   bacteriology:   n  -tion 

Ej  stuffs  ad  Paris 

green;    agri  '  - 

plants:    arm  ,ry:   poult: 

entomology;  irrig 
Xew  York  (Cornell  i.  Ithaca: 

L.H.Bailey Chemistry;   agronomy:   horticnlt  a 

of  plants:   ardmal  husbandrj  dairy  - 


AGRICULTURAL    EXPERIMENT    STATIONS. 


463 


Agricultural  experiment  stations  of  the  United  States,  their  locations,  directors,  and  prin- 
cipal lines  of  tcorlc — Continued. 


station,  location,  and  director. 


Principal  lines  of  work. 


North  Carolina.  Raleigh: 
B.  W.  Kilgore 


North  Dakota.  Agricultural  College 
J.  11.  Worst 


Ohio,  Wooster: 
C.  E.  Thome. 


Oklahoma,  Stillwater: 
W.  L.  English 


Oregon,  Corvallis: 
J.  Withvcombe. 


Pennsylvania  State  College: 
II.  P.  Armsby 


Rhode  Island,  Kingston: 
II.  J.  Wheeler 


South  Carolina,  Clemson  College: 
J.  N.  Harper 


South  Dakota,  Brookings: 
J.  W.  Wilson ".... 


Tennessee,  Knoxville: 
II.  A.  Morgan 


Texas,  College  Station: 
J.  W.  Carson" 


Utah,  Logan: 
P.  A.  Yoder. 


Vermont,  Burlington: 
J.  L.  Hills 


Virginia,  Blacksburg: 
A.  M.  Soule 


Washington,  Pullman: 
E.  A.  Bryan 


West  Virginia,  Morgantown: 
J.  H.  Stewart 


Wisconsin.  Madison: 
W.  A.  Henry 


V.  ,  -mm^r  Laxsmt 

'  B.  C.  Bulium... 


Chemistry;  soils;  agronomy;  horticulture;  animal  husbandry; 

diseases  of  animals  ami  plants;    poultry  experiments;    dairy- 
ing; tests  of  farm  machinery. 

Chemistry;  soils;  botany;  agronomy;  plant  breeding;  horticul- 
ture; forestry;  diseases  of  plants  and  animals;  animal  hus- 
bandry; poultry  experiments;  drainage;  inspection  and 
analysis  of  foods,  spraying  materials,  paints,  drugs,  and  pro- 
prietary products. 

Chemistry;  soils;  agronomy;  botany;  horticulture:  plant 
breeding;  forestry;  diseases  of  plants;  animal  husbandry; 
entomology. 

Chemistry:  agronomy;  horticulture;  plant  breeding;  forestry; 
botany^  bacteriology;  diseases  of  plants  and  animals:  animal 
husbandry;  entomology. 

Chemistry;  bacteriology;  soils;  fertilizers;  agronomy;  horti- 
culture; plant  breeding  and  selection;  diseases  of  plants; 
animal  husbandry;  poultry  experiments;  dairying:  ento- 
mology; irrigation. 

Chemistry:  meteorology:  fertilizers;  horticulture;  plant  dis- 
eases: agronomy;  animal  husbandry;  animal  nutrition; 
dairying. 

Chemistry;  meteorology:  soils;  inspection  of  fertilizers  and 
feeding  stuffs;  agronomy;  horticulture;  plant  breeding; 
poultry  experiments. 

Chemistry:  inspection  of  fertilizers:  soils;  botany;  agronomy; 
horticulture:  plant  breeding;  diseases  of  plants;  animal  hus- 
bandry; dairying;  veterinary  science;  entomology. 

Chemistry;  botany;  agronomy;  horticulture;  plant  breeding: 
diseases  of  plants  and  animals;  animal  husbandry;  entomol- 
ogy. 

Chemistry;  soil  investigations;  inspection  of  fertilizers;  agron- 
omy; horticulture;  plant  breeding;  seeds;  weeds;  diseases 
of  plants  and  animals;  animal  husbandry;  poultry  investi- 
gations;  apiculture;  dairying;  entomology. 

Chemistry;  soils;  agronomy;  horticulture:  animal  husbandry: 
diseases  of  animals;  entomology:  irrigation;  seed  testing: 
feed  inspection. 

Chemistry:  alkali  soil  investigations:  agronomy;  horticulture; 
diseases  of  plants  and  animals;  animal  husbandry;  dairying; 
poultry  experiments;  entomology;  irrigation;  arid  farming. 

Chemistry;  botany;  bacteriology;  inspection  of  fertilizers, 
feeding  stuffs,  ami  creamery  glassware:  agronomy;  horticul- 
ture; diseases  of  plants;  animal  husbandry;  dairying. 

Chemistry;  geology:  biology;  agronomy;  horticulture;  plant 
breeding;  bacteriology;  mycology;  analysis  of  foods  and  soils; 
inspection  of  orchards;  animal  husbandry:  veterinary  sci- 
ence: dairying;  entomology;  cider  and  vinegar  making";  fer- 
ments. 

Chemistry:  botany:  bacteriology:  soils:  agronomy:  horticul- 
ture: plant  breeding;  diseases  of  plants;  animal  husbandry; 
veterinary  science;  dairying;  entomology;  irrigation. 

Chemistry:  inspection  of  fertilizers,  orchards,  and  nurseries; 
soils;  agronomy;  horticulture;  diseases  of  plants  and  ani- 
mals; animal  husbandry ;  poultry  experiments;  entomology. 

Chemistry;  bacteriology;  soils:  agronomy:  horticulture:  plant 
breeding;  animal  husbandry;  dairying;  irrigation,  drainage, 
and  agricultural  engineering. 

Chemistry:  mycology;  botany:  meteorology:  soils;  range  im- 
provement; fertilizers;  agronomy;  plant  selection;  food 
analysis;  animal  husbandry;  irrigation. 


«  Vice-director. 


464 


YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


ASSOCIATION     OF    AMERICAN     AGRICULTURAL     COLLEGES    AND 
EXPERIMENT  STATIONS. 

President.  L.  H.  Bailey,  dean  of  College  of  Agriculture  and  director  of  New  York 
(Cornell)  Experiment  Station.  Ithaca.  X.  Y.:  m< -Mary-treasurer.  J-  L.  Hills,  director 
Vermont  Experiment  Station.  Burlington.  Yt. 

OFFICIALS  IN  CHARGE  OF  FARMERS'  INSTITUTES. 

Farmers'  Institute  Specialist.  r><partmcnt  of  Agriculture. 

John  Hamilton.  Washington.  District  of  Columbia. 
Stab   -  i  nts. 


State  or  Tt  rritorv. 


S 


TosT-office. 


Alabama. 


Alaska.. . 
Arkansas. 


California. .. 
Colorado 

Connecticut . 


Delaware. 


Florida . 
Georgia . 


Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

is 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Mail..' 

Maryland 

Michigan , 

-ota 

Mississippi , 

Missouri 

Montana 

-ka 

-a 

New  Hampshire... 



New  Mexico 

New  York 

North  Carolina 

North  F>akota 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

a 

sylvania 

Porto  Rico 

Rhode  Island 

Carolina 

ta 

Tennessee 



Utah 

Vermont 

Virginia 


Washington. . 
Wist  Virginia. 

sin 

Wyoming 


C.  A.  Cary.  Alabama  Polytechnic  Inst  it  ate 

G.  W.  Carver,  Director  Agricultural  Experiment  Station.. 

C.  C.  Georgeson,  Agricultural  E\ :  Station 

R.  H.  Forbes,  Director  Agricultural  Experir 
W.  G.  Vincenheller,  Director  Agricultural  Ext», 
Station. 

E.  .1.  Wickson.  University  of  California 

EL  M.  Cot  troll.  Director  of  Farmers'  Institutes 

J.  F.  Brown.  Se-eretary  State  Board  of  Agriculture 

.1.  G.  Schwink.  Secy  Connecticu:   Daii  ...  ..iaiion. 

11.  C.  C.  Miles.  Secretary  Connecticut  Pomotog         -    . 

.  Director  of  Farmers'  Institute... . . 
H.  Hayward,  Director  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

R.  W.  Clothier,  University  of  Florida 

EL  C.  White.  President  State  College  of  Agrieult  v.- 

Jordan,  Director  of  Farmers'  Institutes 

J.  G.  Smith,  Agricultural  Exp:  n 

II.  T.  French,  Director  Agricultural  E                     nation- 
Frank  1L  Hall.  BecretaryFarmers'  Institutes 

W.  C.  Latta.  Purdue  University 

J.  C.  Simpson,  Secretary  State  Board  of  Agricultr. 
.1.  II.  Miller.  Superintendent  of  Farmers'  Inslitm.  - 

Hubert  Vreeland.  Commissioner  of  Agrieuliure 

-::missioner  of  Agriculture 

A.  W.  Gilman  -    culture 

\V.  L.  Amoss,  Director  of  Farmers'  Institutes 

J.  I*.  EUswortl     -  :  Board  of  Agrieult 

L.  R.  1         -  tendeht  of  1 

0-.  C.  Gregg       i        i  statutes 

E.  K.  Lloyd.  Director  of  Farmers'  Inst  tut    - 

Gk  o.  P.  Ellis.  -  -Tate  Board  of  Agriculture 

F.  B.  Linfield,  Director  Agr.  E1  

E.  A.  Burnett,  Director  Agricultural  1 

J.  E.  Stubbs,  President  N  -  

N.  J.  Ba  -  Board  of  Agriculture 

Franklii  -        taryStat  rd  of  Agricutti 

.lohn  D.  Tinslcy.  Superintendent  of  Fa 

F .  E .  Da  

S.  L.  Patterson.  Commissioner  of  Agriculture 

E.E.Kaufman.  P.:  raters' Institutes 

T.  L.  Calvert.  Secretary  State  1 

C.  A.  Mi  Secret  of  Agriculture 

.'.With                          .tor  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 
A.  L.  Martin.  Deputy  Secretary  of  Agriculture 

D.  W.  May,  Agricultural  Exper 

John  J.  Dunn,  Secret         Stat  of  Agrieult 

J.  X.  Harper,  Director  Agricultural  E 

A.  E.  Chamberlain. Superintendent  of  Farmers"  Institutes. 

W.  W.  Ogilvie.  Commissioner  of  Agrieult  ure 

.1 .  W.  Carson.  Director  of  Far::.  

P.  A.  Yoder,  Director  Agr.  Exp  Hon 

5  Stat  attun 

0.  W.  Koiner.  Commissioner  of  Agriculture 

.  oltural  Exp  3t  .lion 

E.  E.  Elliott.  Agricultural  College 

H.  E.  V>  :  Agriculture 

G.  B.  MeKerrow.  Director  Farmers'  Institutes 

B.C.  BniTum.  Director  Agricultural  Experiment  Station.. 


stitute. 

■ 

T  tic  son. 

ville. 

Berk-ley. 

N.  Stonington. 

Hartford. 

Milford. 

Newark. 

-  ville. 

Atlanta. 
Honolulu. 

w. 
Spring- 
Lalay 

nes. 
Mauha-' 
Frankfort. 
Baton  Rouge. 
-    -ta. 

Boston. 

lynd. 
Agricultural 

man. 

. 
Conoc  - 
Trent 

- 

ville. 

Raleigh. 

- 

'"JS. 

Guthrie. 

Corvallis. 

Harri> 

- 

Clemson  Coll 
Howard. 
1  :lle. 
-     •  ion. 

- 
Wood  stock. 
Richmond. 
Blacksl>urg. 
Pullman. 
•■    ■ 
Madison. 
Lara:: 


AMERICAN  ASSOCIATION  OF  FARMERS'  INSTITUTE  WORKERS. 

President.  E.  A.  Burnett,  director  of  Agricultural  Experiment  Station.  Lincoln. 
Xelir.;  secretary-treasurer,  John  Hamilton.  Farmers'  Institute  Specialist,  I  .  8. 
Department  of  Agriculture.  Washington.  D.  C.  * 


STATE    OFFICIALS    IX    CHARGE    OF    AGRICULTURE.  465 

STATE    OFFICIALS   IN   CHARGE    OF   AGRICULTURE. a 

Commissioners  of  Agriculture. 


State  or  Territory. 


Name  of  official. 


Alabama 

Arkansas 

Florida 

Georgia 

Idaho 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Montana 

New  Mexico 

New  York 

North  Carolina 

North  Dakota 

Pennsylvania 

Philippine  Islands. 

Porto  Rico 

South  Carolina 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Virginia 

Washington 


J.  A.  Wilkinson 

Guy  B.  Tucker 

B.  E.  McLin 

T.  G.  Hudson 

Allen  Miller,  Com'r  of  Immigration,  etc 

Hubert  Vreeland 

Charles  Schuler 

A .  W .  Oilman 

J .  A .  Ferguson 

J.  W.  Raynolds,  Secretary  of  State 

Chas.  A.  Wieting 

S.  L.  Patterson 

W.  C.  Gilhreath 

N.  B.  Critchfield,  Secretary  of  Agriculture 

W.  C.  Welborn,  Chief,  Bureau  of  Agriculture 

Lawranee  II.  Grahame,  Commissioner  of  the  Interior. 

E.J.  Wa t  son 

W.  W.  Osilvie 

R.  T.  Milner 

Geo.  W.  Koiner 

Sam  II.  Nichols.  Secretary  of  State 


Post-office. 


Montgomery. 

Little  Rock. 

Tallahassee. 

Atlanta. 

Boise. 

Frankfort. 

Baton  Rouge. 

Augusta. 

Helena. 

Santa  Fe. 

Albany. 

Raleigh. 

Bismarck. 

Harrisburg. 

Manila. 

San  Juan. 

Columbia. 

Nashville. 

Austin. 

Richmond. 

Olympia. 


Secretaries  of  State  Boards  of  Agriculture. 


California J.  A .  Filcher 

Colorado V  M.  Hawley 

Connecticut J.  F.  Brown." 

Dela  wa  re Wesley  Webb 

Ha  waii C.  S.  Holloway 

Illinois W.  C.  Garrard 

Indiana I  Chas.  Downing 

Iowa J.  C.  Simpson 

Kansas F.  D.  Coburn 

Maryland !  Wm.  T.  P.  Turpin,  Supt.  of  Immigration. 

Massachusetts J.  L.  Ellsworth 

Michigan i  Addison  M.  Brown 

Minnesota E.  W.  Randall,  Sec.  State  Ag'l  Society. . . . 

Missouri George  B.  Ellis : 

Nebraska W.  R.  Mellor 

Nevada Louis  Bevier 

New  Hampshire j  N.  J.  Bachelder 

New  Jersey !  Franklin  Dye 

North  Carolina T.  K.  Bruner 

Ohio '  T.  L.  Calvert 

Oklahoma C.  A .  Mc Nabb 

Oregon F.  A.  Welch 

Rhode  Island John  J.  Dunn 

South  Dakota |  C.  N.  Mcllvaine 

Vermont '  George  Aitken ; 

West  Virginia T.  B.  Garvin 

Wisconsin John  M.  True 

Wyoming C.  T.  Johnston,  State  Engineer 


Sacramento. 

Fort  Collins. 

North  Stonington. 

Dover. 

Honolulu. 

Springfield. 

Indianapolis. 

Des  Moines. 

Topeka. 

Centerville. 

Boston. 

Agricultural  College. 

St.  Paul. 

Columbia. 

Lincoln. 

Carson  City. 

Concord. 

Trenton. 

Raleigh. 

Columbus. 

Guthrie. 

Salem. 

Providence. 

Huron. 

Woodstock. 

Charleston. 

Madison. 

Chevenne.  . 


a  Officials  of  Territories  and  island  dependencies  are  included.  So  far  as  learned,  Arizona,  Missis- 
sippi, and  Utah  have  no  State  official  charged  with  agricultural  interests,  but  letters  addressed  to 
the  Secretary  of  State  would  probably  receive  attention. 

NATIONAL   DAIRY   ASSOCIATIONS. 


Name  of  organization. 


National  Association  of  Dairy  Instructors  and 

Investigators. 
Association   ol   State   and    National    Food   and 

Dairy  Departments. 

National  Dairy  Union 

National  Creamery  Buttermakers'  Association.. 

Boston  Cooperative  Milk  Producers'  Association. 

Five  States  Milk  Producers'  Association 


3    A1906- 


-30 


Secretary. 


Post-office. 


C.B.Lane U.  S.  Department  of  Agri- 
culture. Washington,  D.C. 
R.  M.  Allen Lexington,  Ky. 

Charles  V.  Knight 1.54  Lake  street.  Chicago. 

E.  Sudendorf 154  Wa shington  street,  Chi- 
cago. 

V>  .  A.  Hunter 10  Florence  street,  Worces- 
ter  Mass. 

H.  T.  Coon Homer,  N.  Y. 


466 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


AMERICAN  NATIONAL  LIVE  STOCK  ASSOCIATION. 

President.  Murdo  Mackenzie.  Trinidad.  retary.  W.  M.  Tonilin?on.  Denver. 

AMERICAN  ASSOCIATION  OF  LIVE   STOCK  HERD  BOOK 
SECRETARIES. 

President,  C.  EL  Thomas,  Independen  •  cretarv.  Charles  F.  Mill?.  Spring- 

field, 111. 

NATIONAL  WOOL  GROVv^RS"  ASSOCIATION. 

President.  Francis  E.  Warren,  Cheyenne;  secretary,  George  S.  Walk  nno. 

THE  CORN-BELT  MEAT  PRODUCERS-  ASSOCIATION. 

President.  A.  L.  Ames.  Buckingham.  Iowa:  secretary.  II.  C.  Wallace.  Des  Moines, 
Iowa. 

PROTECTION  AGAINST  CONTAGION  FROM  FOREIGN  CATTLE. 

An  act  of  Congress  of  August  28,  1894,  prohibits  the  importation  of  cattle  and  cattle 
hides,  but  by  the  act  of  March  2,  1895,  making  appropriations  for  the  Department  of 
Agriculture,  it  is  provided  that  the  prohibition  may  be  suspended  by  the  President 
whenever  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture  shall  certify  to  the  President  what  countries 
or  parts  of  countries  are  free  from  contagious  or  infectious  disi    -    -  mestic  animals. 

The  President,  by  proclamation  of  Noveml  >er  8,  1895,  lifted  the  embargo  with  reference 
rway,  Sweden,  Holland,  Great  Britain.  Ireland,  the  Channel  Islands,  and  the 
countries  of  North.  Central,  and  South  America  bo  as  to  admit  cattle  under  sanitary 
regulations  prescribed  by  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture:  also  from  all  countries  -    .  - 
Lmit  hides  under  regulations  prescribed  by  the  Secretary  of  the  Treasury. 

STOCK  BREEDERS"  ASSOCIATIONS.^ 

s  and  addresses  of  stock  association  secretari-s.  with  breeds  and  n  f  registered 

stock  in  United  States,  December  31, 

CATTLE. 


Number  registered. 

. 

Male. 

i 

Female. 

OgOS... 

Thos.  McFariane..    Union  Stock  Y 
Chicago,  111. 

■ 

112,780 

71.907 

5.403 

14.601 

249.800 

n 

-    \ 

-    ■ 

13.717 
11,080 

:     - 

3.500 
•     J 
6.000 

14.199 
5.500 

10.000 
6,480 

■ 
(c) 

L.  P.  Sisson N.                       

11.  tj.  Richards..                         1  ;. 

Guernsev 

Hereford 

in  Friesian. . 



Polled  Durham 

Red  Polled 

C.  W.  Gray 

Chicago,  111. 

Wm.  n.  Caldwell..    Peterboro,  N.  II. 

C.K.Thomas              225  W.  12th  st. 
-  City,  Mo. 

Frederick    L.     BrattleT>oro.  Vt 

Houghton. 
J.J.Hemingway..    8  W.  17th   st.,   New 
York,  N.  Y. 

Bines..    Indianapolis,  Ind 

H.  A.  Martin Gotham.  Wis 

Shorthorn 

: 

Brown 

John  W.  Groves...    Union  Stock  Y 
Chicago.  111. 
m  Lea Nashville,  Tens 

391. 600 

185 

3.150 

100 
1.500 

a  Under  the  provisions  of  paragraph  473  of  the  act  of  J  ".  amended  March  3.  1903.  any  animal 

imported  specially  for  breeding  purposes  shall  be  admitted,  free,  provided  that  no  such  aninial  shall  be 
admitted  free  unless  pure  bred,  of  a  recognized  breed,  and  duly  registered  in  the  book  of  record  estab- 
lished for  that  breed.  The  Secretary  of  the  Treasury,  upon  the  advice  of  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture. 
April  24.  1903.  regulations  for  the  importation  of  animals  under  this  law.  and  designated  the 
recognized  breeds  and  the  books  of  record  established  for  these  breads. 

*  Owing  to  a  change  in  date  of  making  up  the  books  of  breeders'  associations  no  new  figures  could  be 
obtained  to  show  the  numbers  of  registered  stock  for  December  31, 1906.  The  numbers  in  the  table  are 
for  December  31,  1905. 

c  No  data. 


LIVE-STOCK    ASSOCIATIONS. 


467 


Names  and  addresses  of  stock  association  secretaries,  with  breeds  and  numbers  of  registered 
lir<  stock  in  Urdted  States,  December  31,  190S — Continued. 


HORSES. 


Breed. 


Cleveland  Bay. . 
Clydesdale 


Coach,  French. 

i'T'IK-h  . 


Coach,  German 

Coach,  G  e  r  m  a  n 
(Oldenburg). 

Draft,  Belgian 

Draft,  French 

Hackney 


Morgan. . . 
Pcreheron . 


Percheron 

Saddle     Horse, 

American. 
Shetland  Pony 

Shire 

SulTolk 

Thoroughbred 


Secretary. 


R.  P.  Stcricker... 
K.  B.  Ogilvie 


Chas.  C.  Glenn.... 
Duncan  E.  Wtllett 


J.  Crouch 

C.  E.  Stub lis. 


J.  D.  Connor,  jr. . 

C.  E.  Stubbs 

A.  II.  Godfrey 


H.  T.  Cutis 

Geo.  W.  Stubble- 
field. 
Charles C.  Glenn.. 
I.  B.  Nail 


Trotter,  American. 
Jacks  and  Jennies. 


Mortimer  Levering 
Charles  Burgess. . . 

Alex.  Galbraith 

James  E.  Wheeler. 

Wm.  II.  Knight... 

J.  W.  Jones 


Post-ollic  V. 


80  Chestnut  ave.,  W. 

Orange,  N.  J. 
Union  Stock  Yards, 

Chicago,  111. 

Columbus,  Ohio 

Maple  ave.  and  l  tar- 

rison  st.,  Oak  Park, 

IU. 

Lafayette,  Ind 

Fairfield,  Iowa 

Wabash,  Ind 

Fairfield,  Iowa 

Tichenor  Grand  Bldg 
61st  and  Broadway, 
New  York  City. 

Middlebury,  Vt 

Union  Stock  Yards, 
;o,  111. 

Columbus,  Ohio 

Louisville,  Ky 

Lafayette,  Ind 

Wenona,  111 

Janes  viUe,  Wis 

571  Fifth  a vc,  New 
YorJk,  N.  Y. 

355  Dearborn  St.,  Chi- 
cago, IU. 

Columbia,  Tenn 


Number  registered.'  Number  living. 


Male. 

Female. 

Male. 

Female. 

1,236 

502 

1, 050 

400 

a  12 

,370 

(6) 

(*>) 

130 

4 

125 

4 

1,656 
360 

246 

23 

1,500 

I'll 

225 
14 

2,056 

9.000 
c  726 

266 

5,000 
c  1,542 

2.055 

c  i,s4 

265 
c  1,416 

(■5.021 
1,640 

c  2. son 

1.460 

c3,765 
1-9,000 

c2,100 
12, 000 

928 
d  2, 529 

102 
3,549 

913 

94 

2,300 
6,062 
159 
a  4£ 

3,500 
2,148 

88 
,309 

2,000 

B 

2,500 

(6) 
150 

42,597 

c  152, 700 

(b) 

(») 

1.000 

750 

750 

51  i0 

SHEEP. 


Cheviot 

Cotswold 

Dorset  Horn 

Hampshire  Down 

Leicester 

Lincoln 

Merino  (Delaine) 
Merino  (Delaine) 

Meiino  (Delaine) 

Merino  (Delaine) . 

Merino  (French). 
Merino  (German) 
Merino  (Spanish) 
Merino  (Spanish! 

Mr! ino  (Spa  dish 

Merino  (Spanish) 

Merino  (Spanish) 
Oxford  Down  .  .  . 
Sh  ropshire 

Southdown 

SulTolk 


F.  E.  Dawlev 

F.  W.  Harding... 

J.  E.  Wing 

Comfort  A.  Tyler. 

A.  J.  Temple 

Bert  Smith 

II.  G.  McDowell.. 
George  A.  Henry. 

R.  P.  Berry 

J.  B.  Johnson 

D wight  Lincoln. . 

E.  M.  Moore 

E.  N.  Ball 

Wesley  Bishop. .. 

J.  II.  Earll 

J.  P.  Ray 

C,  A.  Chapman. .. 

W.  A.  Shafor 

Mortimer  Levering 
Frank  S.  Springer 
Geo.  W.  Franklin. 


Fayetteville,  N.  Y... 

Waukesha,  Wis 

Mechanics!) urg,  Ohio 

Notta  wa ,  Mich 

Cameron,  111 

Charlotte,  Mich 

Canton,  Ohio 

R.  F.  I).  8.  Beliefem- 
taine,  Ohio. 

R.  F.  D.  3,  Eighty- 
four,  Pa. 

24S  WTPitee  st.,  Can- 
onshurg,  Pa. 

Miiford  Center,  Ohio. 

Orchard  Lake,  Mich. 

Ann  Arbor,  Mich 

R.  F.D.I,  Del- ware, 
Ohio. 

Skaneatejes,  N.  Y... 

R.  F.  D.  3,  E.  Bloom- 
field.  N.  Y. 

Middlebury,  Vt 

Hamilton,  Ohio 

Lafayette,  Ind 

Springfield,  111 

Des  Moines,  Iowa  . . . 


a  10,700 
a  36.  610 


5.573 
3,538 

5,  754 


3,703 
12, 844 
5.  437 
8.246 
a  9,  401 
000         14,300 


<-5,054 
6,805 


162 
12,530 
16,69! 

7.916 
1 .  275 


('11.259 
11,599 


191 
37,700 
33,384 

11,912 
1.500 


575  |    2,650 
a   14,000 


a  217,850 
c  32, 798 
100,000   134,000 
a  19,983 
a  1,013 


1,000 

3,000 
2,  972 
i,  100 


2.800 
9,080 
4,567 
5,900 

a  [.:■ 
2,500  8.000 

c  1,500        c3,OQ0 


1,500 

m 

105 

400 

2,842 

280 

100 

Cm 

(ft) 

20,000 


5,000 

(6) 

175 
4.300 
8,035 

1 .  875 
290 

(") 
(ft 
40,060 


a  10.201) 
a  550 


a  Total  of  males  and  females.        h  No  data.        <■  Estimate  for  1904. 


d  Includes  geldings 


468 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Names  and  addresses  of  stock  association  secretaries,  with  breeds  and  numbers  of  registered 
lire  stock  in  United  States,  December  SI,  1906 — Continued. 


_ 

Number  registered. 

Number  living. 

Breed. 

Secretary. 

Post-office. 

Male. 

Female. 

Male. 

Female. 

Berkshire 

Frank  S.  Springer. 

510    E.    Monroe    st., 

O88.0S0 

"33.000 

Springfield.  111. 

Ed  S.  Hill 

Freeville.  N.  \ 

Columbus,  Ohio 

1,225 

2.115 
8,912 

275 
600 

Chester  White 

Ernest  Freigau 

2.000 

J.  C.  Hiles 

Cleveland,  Ohio 

3.403 

9.000 

1.800 

6.200 

proved. 

Duroc  Jersev 

T.  B.  Pearson 

Thorntown,  Ind 

$.026 

18.450 

(«) 

M 

Duroe  Jersev 

Robert  J.  Evans... 

Peoria.  Ill 

21,800 

55.000 

a  30.000 

Hampshire   (Thin 

E.  C.  Stone 

Armstrong,  HI 

294 

540 

155 

3S7 

Rind). 

Poland  China 

YV.  M.  McFadden.. 

Union  Stock  Yards, 
Chicago.  111. 

52.331 

130. 620 

27,000 

68,000 

Poland  China 

A.  M.  Brown 

Drawer  10,  V\  inches- 
ter.  Ind. 

32.000 

72.000 

10.000 

23.000 

Poland  China 

Geo.  F.Woodworth 

Marvville,  Mo 

39.008 

93,  2.34 

2.000 

IS. 000 

Poland  China 

H.  P.  Wilson 

Gadsden.  Tenn 

091 

1.030 

400 

GOO 

E.  N.  Ball 

Ann  Arbor,  Mich 

White     Bear     Lake, 

c  1 
2,860 

949 

3.640 

fl 
2,000 

200 

Yorkshire 

Harrv  G.  Kruni 

3.200 

Minn. 

a  Total  of  males  and  females.  l>  Xo  data.  <■  Estimate  for  1904. 

SANITARY  OFFICERS  IN  CHARGE  OF  LIVE  STOCK  INTERESTS. 


State  or  Territory. 


Name  and  post-office. 


Official  position. 


Alabama 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

California 

Colorado 

Connecticut . . . 
Delaware 

Florida 

Georgia 

Hawaii 

Idaho 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

Maine 

Maryland 

Massachusetts. 
Michigan 

Minnesota 

Mississippi. . . . 
Missouri 

Montana 

Nebraska 

Nevada 


C.  A.  Cary.  Auburn State  veterinarian. 

J.  D.  Carter.  Prescott Secretary  live-stock  sanitary  commission. 

J.C.  Norton,  Phoenix Veterinarian. 

R.  R.  Dinwiddie.  Fayetteville State  veterinarian. 

Charles  Keane.  Sacramento '  Do. 

L.  B.  Sylvester.  Denver ]  President  State  board  of  stock  inspection 

commissioners. 

Charles  G.Lamb.  Denver State  veterinary  surgeon. 

Heman  O.  Averill.  Hartford Commissioner  for  domestic  animals. 

Alex.  Lowber.  Wilmington Secretary  State  board  of  health. 

H.  P.  Eves,  Newark Instructor  in  veterinary  science.  Delaware 

College. 

Thomas  J.  Mahaffy.  Jacksonville Veterinarian.  State  board  of  health. 

Thos.  G.  Hudson.  Atlanta Commissioner  of  agriculture. 

Victor  A.  Norgaard.  Honolulu Territorial  veterinarian. 

George  E.  Noble.  Boise State  veterinarian. 

H.  ET  Wadsworth.  Springfield Secretary  board  of  live-stock  commis- 
sioners. 

3,    M.    Wright,    1S27    Wabash    ave..     State  veterinarian. 
Chicago. 

A.  W.  Bitting.  Lafayette Do. 

Paul  O.  Koto.  Forest  City State  veterinary  surgeon. 

John  D.  Baker.  Peabody! Live-stock  sanitary  commissioner. 

F.  T.  Eisenman.  Louisville State  veterinarian. 

W.  H.  Dalrvmple,  Baton  Rouge Veterinarian  State  exoerirnent  station. 

F.  O.  Beat.  Bangor I 

John  M.  Deering,  Saco [-Board  of  cattle  commissioners. 

Frank  S.  Adams.  Bowdoinham J 

G.  Allen  Jarman.  Chestertown Chief  veterinary  inspector. 

Wade  II.  D.  Warfield.  Baltimore Secretary  livestock  sanitary  board. 

Austin  Peters.  Boston Chief  of  cattle  bureau  of  State  board  of 

agriculture. 

Willian-fttf.  Morris.  Cass  City State  veterinarian. 

H.  H.  Hinds,  Stanton President  State  live-stock  sanitary  com- 
mission. 

B.H.  Ward.  St.  Paul Secretary  State  live-stock  sanitary  board. 

C.  E.  Cotton.  Minneapolis Veterinarian  live-stock  sanitary  board. 

H.  M.  Bracken.  St.  Paul Secretary  State  board  of  health. 

J.  C.  Robert,  Agricultural  College Professor  of  veterinary  science. 

D.  F.  Luckey.  Columbia State  veterinarian. 

Geo.  B.  Ellis.  Columbia Secretary  State  board  of  agriculture. 

M.  E.  Knowles.  Helena State  veterinarian. 

W.  G.  Preuitt.  Helena Secretary  live-stock  commission. 

Charles  A.  McKimm.  Lincoln State  veterinarian. 

I.  W.  u'Rourke,  Reno Do. 


FORESTRY    ASSOCIATIONS    AXD    SCHOOLS. 
Sanitary  officers  in  charge  of  live  stock  interests — Continued. 


469 


State  or  Territory. 


Name  and  post-office. 


Official  position. 


New  Hampshire. 

New  Jersey 

New  Mexico 


New  York. 


North  Carolina... 
North  Dakota 


N.  J.  Bachelder,  Concord 

E.  B.  Voorhees.  New  Brunswick. 

W.  C.  Barnes,  Las  Vegas 

Harry  F.  Lee,  Albuquerque 

C.  A.'Wieting,  Albany 

W.  H.  Kellv.  Albany. 

Tait  Butler.  Raleigh 

S.  L.  Patterson,  Raleigh 

W.  F.  Crewe.  Devils  Lake 

Ohio Paul  Fischer.  Columbus 

T.  L.  Calvert.  Columbus 

Oklahoma '  C.  J.  Davis,  Guthrie 

Thomas  Morris.  Guthrie 

Oregon William  McLean,  Portland 

j  Wm.  H.  Ly tie,  Pendleton 

Pennsylvania [  Leonard  Pearson.  Philadelphia.. 

Porto  Rico Thos.  A.  Allen,  San  Juan 

Rhode  Island John  S.  Pollard,  Providence 

John  J   Dunn,  Providence 

South  Carolina Louis  A.  Klein,  Clemson  College.. 

South  Dakota Thos.  H.  Hicks,  Milbank 

Tennessee R.  H.  Kittrell.  Nashville 

Texas J.  H.  Wilson,  Quanah 

Utah John  Austin,  Heber  Citv 


Vermont 

Virginia 

Washington . . 
West  Virginia. 
Wisconsin 


Wyoming. 


H.  S.  Wilson.  Arlington 

J.  G.  Ferneyhough,  Blacksburg. 

S.  B.  Nelson.  Pullman 

J.  B.  Garvin,  Charleston 

David  Roberts.  Janesville 

John  M.  True.  Madison 

William  F.  Pflaeging,  Cheyenne. 
George  S.  Walker,  Cheyenne 


Secretary  board  of  cattle  commissioners. 
President  State  board  of  agriculture. 
Secretary  cattle  sanitary  board. 
Secretary  sheep  sanitary  board. 
Commissioner  department  of  agriculture. 
Chief  veterinarian. 
State  veterinarian. 
Commissioner  of  agriculture. 
State  veterinarian. 

Do. 
Secretary  State  live-stock  commission. 
Territorial  veterinarian. 
Secretary  live-stock  sanitary  commission. 
State  veterinarian. 
Sheep  inspector. 
State  veterinarian. 
Veterinary  inspector,  health  office. 
Veterinarian  State  board  of  agriculture. 
Secretary  State  board  of  agriculture. 
State  veterinarian. 

Do. 
State  live-stock  commissioner. 
Secretary  live-stock  sanitary  commission. 
President  State  board  of  sheep  commis- 
sioners. 
Cattle  commissioner. 
State  veterinarian. 

Do. 
Secretary  board  of  agriculture. 
State  veterinarian. 
Secretary  State  sanitary  board. 
State  veterinarian. 

Secretary  State  board  of  sheep  commis- 
sioners. 


FORESTRY  ASSOCIATIONS. 

American  Forestry  Association. — President,  Hon.  James  Wilson.  Secretary  of  Agri- 
culture; vice-presidents,  Edward  Everett  Hale.  F.  E.  Weyerhaeuser,  James  YV. 
Pinchot,  B.  E.  Fernow,  John  L.  Kaul;  secretary.  Thomas  E.  Will,  Washington,  D.  C. 

International  Society  of  Arboriculture. — President,  Gen.  William  J.  Palmer.  Col- 
orado Springs,  Colo.;  vice-president.  Henry  John  Elwes,  F.  R.  S.,  Colesborne.  Chel- 
tenham, England;  secretary.  J.  P.  Brown,  Connersville.  Ind. 

Society  of  American  Foresters. — President.  Gifford  Pinchot.  Washington,  D.  C; 
secretary,  George  B.  Sud worth.  Washington,  D.  C. 

SCHOOLS  OF  FORESTRY. 


Yale  University.  Forest  School.  Xew  Haven,  Conn. — A  two-years  graduate  course, 
leading  to  the  degree  of  Master  of  Forestry.  Under  the  direction  of  the  officers  of  the 
Yale  Forest  School,  a  two-months  summer  course.  July  and  August,  is  conducted  at 
Milford,  Pike  County.  Pa.     Prof.  Henry  S.  Graves,  Director. 

Biltmore  Forest  School.  Biltmore,  X.  C. — Course  covers  entire  year;  daily  lectures 
in  all  branches  of  applied  forestry,  elements  of  botany,  mathematics,  geology,  law. 
and  political  economy;  practical  work,  especially  lumbering  operations,  on  the 
domain  of  the  Biltmore  estate:   forest  investigations.     Dr.  C.  A.  Schenck.  Director. 

University  of  Michigan.  Forest  School,  part  of  the  general  Department  of  Literature. 
Science,  and  the  Arts.  Ann  Arbor,  Mich.— A  two-years  graduate  course  leading  to  the 
degree  of  Master  of  Science  in  Forestry.     Filibert  Roth.  Professor  of  Forestry. 

Harvard  University.  Forest  School,  Cambridge,  Mass. — A  four-years  undergraduate 
course,  in  connection  with  the  Lawrence  Scientific  School.  R.  T.  Fisher,  in  charge  of 
curriculum.  % 

Pennsylvania  State  College,  Forest  School,  State  College,  Pa. — A  four-years  tinder- 
graduate  course,  in  connection  with  the  State  Department  of  Agriculture. 

Courses  in  forestry  are  now  given  at  the  University  of  Maine.  Orono,  Me..  Gordon  E. 
Tower,   in   charge;    the  Michigan   State  Agricultural  College.   Agricultural  College, 


470 


YEARI  THE    DEPAEIAIENT    OF    AGEK'ULTUBE. 


Mich..  E.  E.  Bogus  Sfa  ra,  H.  P.  Baker,  in 

charge:  Unrwere  Lincoln,  Nebr.,  Fraiik  G.  Miller,  in  charge;  M 

sippi  Agricultural  m  I   College.   Agricultuj  s       M  ge   L. 

Clothier,  in  ch.  :_  iversity  oi  l  Akerrnan. 

..do  CoBege.  Colors  i  Purdue  I 

I.'.d..  Pr  :..!  h  Iter,  in  charge ;  V 

Park.  Minn..  Prof.  Samuel  j  liege,  Beren.   E 

Flaneiy.  in  ch     g  h  Dakota  School  el  ineau.  N.  Dak..  J.  Allen 

- 
A  i  afly  at  the  Massachusetts  State  Agricultural  College. 

Amherst,  by  Fl  .land 

Agricultural  College         .  .     '  by  Fred  Maryland: 

at  th  n,  by  Edward  M.  GrifhiL    - 

nsin:  and  at  C  I  College,  1  ;  high  P.  Baker, 

restry  at  -  fa    I      i  State  <     II  ge. 

NATIONAL  BEE  KEEPERS'  ASSOCIATION. 

-idem.  L.  kson, Mich.;  secretary ,  J.  A  G  Junction, 

Colo.:  general  m  .1  treasurer.  X.  E.  .' 

NATIONAL  ASSOCIATION  OP  ECONOMIC  ENTCXOLOGISTS. 

President,  H.  A.  Morgan,  Knoxville,  -       --.jy.  A.  F.  15  .: 

street.  Reading 

ASSOCIATION  OF  OFFICIAL  AGKTCCLTirRAL  CHEMISTS. 

Pre  hn  P.  Street.  New  retary,  H.  W.  "Wiley 

Depar 

NATIONAL  KOETICCLTCTtAL  AND  ETNDEED   SOCIETIES. 


Name  of  organization. 


> 


- 


American  Apple  Grew*-  

American  Association  of  Xur-  

American  Carnation  Society . . . ." 

American  CranV  - 

American  Institute  Farmers' Club 


American  Institute.  Horticultural  Secti      

American  Nursery  :ation.. 

ri  an  Pomo!'  _  

American  Retail  Nurserymen's  Protecii 

sociation. 
Amen  -     ietf 


- 
the  N 

anthemuni  Society  of  America D:.  




Georg 

A.  J.  Rider 

1Ym.  A.  Ear 


Leonard  Barron 

-  H.  Meehan. 

J-ohn  Crgiff 

Guv  A. 


Ko. 

Rochester.  X.  Y. 

X.J. 
York,  X.  Y. 
Ithaca.  X.  Y. 


Wm.  J. 


■  :i  Xurseryr: 

Internatioi.  

-ippi  Valley  Apple  Growers'  Association.. 

: r!  Valley  Horricultun-. If  

.n!  League  of  Commission  Merchants  of 
I 

Xational  Xot  Growers'  Association 

Xorthwesrern  Fr.:  lotion 

-  -ociat ion  . . . 

Peninsula  llorrjcnitur?. IS  

American  Florists  "and  Ornamental 
Iloriicult:;- 

Southwestern  Xu  r  '•-  ssoeiation 

rvmen 


Wrr: 

A.  Warren  Patch. 


J  ames  H  andl v 

A.  Warren  Patch. 


C  V.  Huffman.. 

Wm.  j .  - 

vlor 

E.  J.  Holman 


Louis. 

•  1  Home  v.- 

•    Y. 

I 

•  .  111. 
P.  F.  I 

Bostoa. 

Pouiarj. 

N.  Y. 

:on  place.  I 

-V. . --. 

T. 
Leaver.- 


STATE    HIGHWAY    OFFICIALS. 
STATE  HIGHWAY  OFFICIALS. 


471 


State. 


Name  and  title. 


Post-office. 


California 

Connecticut 

Delaware 

District  of  Colum 

bia. 
Illinois 

Ii-wa 

Maine 

Maryland 

Massachusetts 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

New  Hampshire. 
New  Jersey  

New  York , 

North  Carolina.. 
Ohio 

Pennsylvania 

Rhode  Island 

Vermont 

Virginia 

Washington 


N.  Ellery,  commissioner  department  of  highways 

James  H.  MacDonald,  commissioner,  State  highway  depart- 
ment. 

Francis  A.  Price,  State  highway  commissioner  for  Newcastle 
County. 

C.  B.  Hunt,  engineer  of  highways,  Dist  rict  of  Columbia 


Dr.  E.  J.  James,  chairman 

A.  N.  Johnson,  highway  engineer,  State  highway  commission. 

Prof.  A.  Marston,  dean,  division  of  engineering 

T.  II.  McDonald,  assistant  in  charge  of  public  roads,  State 
College. 

Paul  D.  Sargent,  commissioner  of  highways 

William  Bullock  Clark,  State  geologist , 

Walter  W.  Crosby,  chief  engineer  highway  division,  geolog- 
ical survey. 

William  E.  McClintock,  chairman 

A.  B.  Fletcher,  secretary  State  highway  commission 

Horatio  S.  Earle,  commissioner 

Frank  F.  Rogers,  highway  engineer,  State  highway  depart- 
ment. 

Gustave  Scholle,  president 

George  W.  Cooley,  engineer,  State  highway  commission 

Arthur  W.  Deaii,  State  engineer,  highway  department 

Elisha  C.  Hutchinson,  chairman 

R.  A.  Meeker,  supervisor  State  commission  of  public  mads.. . 

Frederick  Skene,  State  engineer  and   surveyor 

Samuel  L.  Patterson,  chairman  State  highway  commission... 

Sam  Huston,  commissioner  State  highway  department 

Joseph  W.  Hunter,  State  highway  commissioner 

R.  D.  Beeman,  assistant  commissioner 

John  II.  Edwards,  chairman  State  board  of  public  works 

Charles  W.  Gates,  State  highway  commissioner 

P.  St.  Julien  Wilson,  State  highway  commissioner 

Joseph  M.  Snow,  State  highway  commissioner 


Sacramento. 
Hartford. 

Wilmington. 

Washington. 

Springfield. 

Do. 
Ames. 

Do. 

Augusta. 
Baltimore. 
Do. 

Boston. 

Do. 
Lansing. 

Do. 

Minneapolis. 

Do. 
Concord. 
Trenton. 

Do. 
Albany. 
Raleigh. 
Columbus. 
Harrisburg. 

Do. 
Providence. 
Montpelier. 
Richmond. 
Olympia. 


STATE  OFFICIALS  IN  CHARGE  OF  PROTECTION  OF  GAME." 


Maryland 

Massachusetts... 


Michigan. 
Minnesota 


Missouri 

Montana 

Nebraska 

New  Hampshire.. . 

Newr  Jersey 


Alabama John  II.  Wallace,  jr.,  State  game  commissioner 

Arizona W.  L.  Pinney,  secretary  fish  and  game  commission 

California Chas.  A.  Vogelsang,  chief  deputy  board  of  fish  commissioners. 

Colorado D.  E.  Farr,  State  game  and  fish  commissioner 

Connecticut E.  Hart  Geer,  secretary  commission  of  fisheries  and  game 

Delaware A.  D.  Poole,  president  Delaware  Game  Protective  Association. 

Idaho W.N.  Stephens,  fish  and  game  warden 

Illinois Dr.  John  A.  Wheeler,  State  game  commissioner 

Indiana Z.  T.  Sweeney,  commissioner  of  fisheries  and  game 

Iowa G.  A.  Lincoln,  State  fish  and  game  warden 

Kansas D.  W.  Travis,  State  fish  and  game  warden 

Maine L.  T.  Carleton,  chairman  commissioners  of  inland  fisheries  and 

game. 

Oregon  Milton  Dennis,  State  game  warden 

Dr.  George  W.  Field,  ehairman  commissioners  of  fisheries 
and  game. 

Chi  rles  II.  Chapman,  game  and  fish  warden 

Carlos  Avery,  executive  agent,  hoard  of  game  and  fish  com- 
missioners". 

Joseph  II.  Rodes,  game  and  fish  warden 

William  F.  Scott,  State  game,  and  fish  warden 

George  L.  Carter,  chief  deputy  game  and  fish  commission 

Nathaniel  Wentworth,  chairman  board  of  fish  and  game  com- 
missioners. 

Benjamin  P.  Morris,  president  board  of  fish  and  game  com- 
missioners. 

New  Mexico W.  E.  Griffin,  game  and  fish  warden 

New  York James  B.  Whipple,  forest,  fish,  and  game  commissioner 

North  Carolina T.  Gilbert  Pearson,  secretary  Audubon  Society 

North  Dakota Wr.  N.  Smith,  game  warden,  district  No.  1 

William  McKean,  game  warden,  district  No.  2 

Ohio <  leorge  C.  Blankner,  secretary  commissioners  of  fish  and  game. 

Oklahoma Eugene  Wat  rous,  Territ orial  game  and  fish  warden 

Oregon |  J.  W.  Baker,  game  and  forestry  warden 

Pennsylvania '  Dr.  Joseph  Kall.fus,  secretary  board  of  game  commissioners. . 

Rhode  Island '  John  II.  Flanagan,  chairman  commissioners  of  birds 

South  Carolina B.  F.  Taylor,  president  Audubon  Society 


Montgomery. 

Phoenix. 

San  Francisco. 

Denver. 

Hadlyme. 

Wilmington. 

Boise. 

Springfield. 

Columbus. 

Cedar  Rapids. 

Pratt. 

Augusta. 

Baltimore. 
Boston. 

Sault  Ste.  Marie. 
St.  Paul. 

Sedalia. 
Helena. 
Lincoln. 
Hudson. 

Long  Branch. 

Santa  Fe. 

Albany. 

Greensboro. 

Grafton. 

Sanborn. 

Columbus. 

Enid. 

Cottage  Grove. 

Harrisburg. 

i  'ri  n  idence. 

Columbia. 


a  Corrected  to  May  1,  1907 


472  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

State  officials  in  charge  of  protection  of  game — Continued. 


State. 

Name  and  title. 

Post-office. 

Utah 

H.  B.  Cromar,  State  fish  and  game  commissioner 

Henry  G.  Thomas,  fish  and  game  commissioner 

Salt  Lake  City. 
Stowe. 
Bellingham. 
Huntington. 

Vermont 

Washington 

West  Virginia 

ORGANIZATIONS  FOB  PROTECTION  OF  BIRDS  AND  GAME. 


Name  of  organization. 


American  Ornithologists'  Union,  Committee  on 

Protection  of  North  American  Birds. 
Bird  Protective  Society  of  America ; 

Boone  and  Crockett  Club 

League  of  American  Sportsmen 

National  Association  of  Audubon  Societies 

National  Association  of  Game  and  Fish  Wardens. 
New  York  Zoological  Society 

North  American  Fish  and  Game  Protective  Asso- 
ciation. 


Secretary. 


A.   K.   Fisher,  chair- 
man. 
Edward  C.  Pease 


Post-office. 


Madison  Grant 

G.  O.  Shields,  presi- 
dent. 

William  Dut cher , 
president. 

George  L.  Carter. . . . 

Madison  G  rant 


E.  T.  D.  Chambers... 


Department  of  Agriculture, 
Washington,  I'.  C. 

28  Stafford  Building,  Buf- 
falo, N.  Y. 

11  Wall  street,  New  York, 
N.  Y. 

1209  Broadwav,  New  York, 
N.  Y. 

141  Broadway,  New  York, 
N.  Y. 

Lincoln,  Nebr. 

11  Wall  street,  New  York, 
N.  Y. 

Quebec,  Canada. 


AMERICAN  BREEDERS'  ASSOCIATION. 

President,  James  Wilson,  Washington,  D.  C;  vice-president,  L.  H.  Kerrick," 
Bloomington,  111.;  secretary,  W.  M.  Hays,  Washington,  D.  C;  treasurer,  Oscar  Erf, 
Manhattan,  Kans.;  chairman  animal  section,  A.  P.  Grout,  Winchester,  111.;  secretary 
animal  section,  C.  B.  Davenport,  Cold  Spring  Harbor,  N.  Y. ;  chairman  plant  section, 
Chas.  W.  Ward,  Queens,  N.  Y.;  secretary  plant  section,  N.  E.  Hansen,  Brookings, 
S.  Dak. 

FARMERS'  NATIONAL  CONGRESS. 

President,  John  M.  Stahl,  Chicago,  111.;  first  vice-president,  B.  Cameron,  Stagville, 
N.  C;  second  vice-president,  Joshua  Strange,  Marion,  Ind.;  treasurer,  W.  L.  Ames, 
Oregon,  Wis.;  secretary,  George  M.  Whitaker,  Washington,  D.  C;  first  assistant  secre- 
tary, Luther  H.  Tucker,  Albany,  N.  Y. ;  second  assistant  secretary,  John  H.  Kimball, 
Port  Deposit,  Md. ;  executive  committee,  president,  secretary,  and  treasurer,  E.  W. 
Wickey,  East  Chicago,  Ind.;  Levi  Morrison,  Greenville,  Pa.;  A.  C.  Fuller,  Dows,  Iowa. 

PATRONS  OF  HUSBANDRY. 

OFFICERS    OF    NATIONAL    ORAN'CK. 

Master,  N.  J.  Bachelder,  Concord,  N  H.;  overseer,  T.  C.  Atkeson,  Morgantown, 
W.  Va, ;  lecturer.  G.  W.  F.  Gaunt,  Mullica  Hill,  N.  J.;  treasurer,  Mrs.  E.  S.  McDowell, 
Rome,  N.  Y.;  secretary,  C.  M.  Freeman.  Tippecanoe  City,  Ohio;  executive  commit- 
tee, E.  B.  Norris,  Sodus,  N.  Y.;  C.  J.  Bell,  East  Hardwick,  Vt.;  F.  A.  Derthick, 
Mantua,  Ohio;  N.  J.  Bachelder,  ex  officio,  Concord,  N.  H. 


"Deceased. 


WEATHER   AND    CROP    CONDITIONS    IN    1906.  473 

KEVIEW  OF  WEATHER    CONDITIONS    DURING    THE    CROP    SEASON 

OF   1906. 

By  James  Berry,  Chief  of  Climatological  Division,  Weather  Bureau. 

The  accompanying  illustrations  (see  figs.  17  to  19  and  Plates  XL  to  XLII)  and 
tables  (pp.  490  and  491)  show  how  the  temperature  and  rainfall  over  the  United 
States  during  the  crop  season  of  1906,  from  week  to  week,  compare  with  the  normal 
conditions  of  corresponding  periods  of  former  years.  The  diagrams  exhibit  the  depar- 
ture from  normal  by  districts,  and  the  maps  show,  respectively,  the  departures  from 
normal  temperature,  the  total  precipitation,  and  the  departures  from  normal  precipi- 
tation during  the  crop  season. 

January. 

January,  1906,  was  exceptionally  mild  over  much  the  greater  part  of  the  country, 
the  average  temperature  being  above  the  normal  in  all  districts,  with  the  exception 
of  the  central  portions  of  the  middle  and  southern  Plateau  regions  and  extreme  south- 
ern Florida,  where  it  was  slightly  below,  and  in  portions  of  the  Gulf  States,  where  it 
was  about  normal.  The  excess  in  temperature  throughout  the  central  and  northern 
portions  of  the  country  was  unusually  marked,  ranging  from  6°  to  13°  per  day.  In 
the  Missouri,  upper  Mississippi,  and  Red  River  of  the  North  valleys,  the  Lake  region, 
and  southern  New  England  the  temperature  excess  generally  was  more  than  9°.  On 
the  Pacific  coast  the  temperature  excess  was  slight,  except  in  Washington  and  over 
the  interior  portions  of  central  and  northern  California,  where  it  was  more  than  3° 
per  day. 

The  precipitation  exceeded  the  average  in  the  upper  Mississippi,  lower  Missouri, 
and  lower  Arkansas  valleys,  the  northern  portion  of  the  upper  Lake  region,  the  greater 
part  of  the  South  Atlantic  States,  the  western  portion  of  the  central  Plateau  region, 
and  in  California,  except  in  the  vicinity  of  San  Francisco  and  in  the  extreme  southern 
part  of  the  State.  Over  areas  extending  from  western  Arkansas  to  southern  Illinois 
and  from  western  Florida  to  southwestern  Virginia  the  precipitation  was  unusually 
heavy,  amounts  ranging  from  6  to  more  than  9  inches  being  reported  from  these  dis- 
tricts. Generally  throughout  New  England  and  the  Middle  Atlantic  States,  the  lower 
Lake  region,  upper  Ohio  Valley,  eastern  Tennessee,  in  the  central  and  west  Gulf 
States,  southern  Plateau  region,  and  on  the  north  Pacific  coast  the  precipitation  was 
below  the  average,  being  decidedly  deficient  in  New  England  and  the  lower  Lake 
region  and  in  portions  of  the  central  and  west  Gulf  districts. 

LITTLE    SXOW    OX    THE    GROUND. 

At  the  close  of  the  month  the  districts  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  were  wholly 
free  from  snow,  with  the  exception  of  a  comparatively  small  area  extending  from  the 
upper  Missouri  Valley  eastward  to  Lake  Huron,  including  a  small  part  of  the  upper 
Mississippi  Valley.  There  was  practically  no  snow  in  New  England,  except  in  shel- 
tered places  in  the  northern  portion. 

February. 

As  a  whole,  February,  1906,  averaged  colder  than  usual  in  the  Middle  and  South 
Atlantic  and  Gulf  States,  Ohio  Valley,  and  portions  of  the  lower  Lake  region  and  the 
upper  Mississippi  Valley.  The  deficiency  in  temperature  was  most  marked  in  the 
upper  Ohio  Valley  and  in  the  central  Gulf  States,  where  it  amounted  to  6°  per  day. 
Generally  throughout  the  South  Atlantic  and  Gulf  States  and  in  the  Ohio  and  central 
Mississippi  valleys  the  deficiency  amounted  to  more  than  3°  per  day.  Over  the  north- 
ern portion  of  the  Lake  region,  along  the  New  England  coast,  and  over  the  south- 
eastern Rocky  Mountain  slope  the  month  averaged  slightly  milder  than  usual;  it  was 
decidedly  milder  than  usual  throughout  the  Rocky  Mountain  and  Plateau  regions 
and  in  the  upper  Missouri  Valley,  where  the  temperature  excess  ranged  from  3°  to 
12°  per  day,  being  most  marked  in  Montana. 

From  the  1st  to  the  3d  the  maximum  temperatures  on  the  central  and  southern 
California  coasts  equaled  or  exceeded  the  records  of  former  years  for  the- first  decade 
of  February;  on  the  19th  and  20th  unseasonably  high  maximum  temperatures  occurred 
in  central  Nebraska,  the  upper  Michigan  Peninsula,  and  in  northern  New  England, 
and  on  the  23d  and  24th  the  maximum  records  were  broken  at  numerous  stations  in 
the  lower  Lake  region,  lower  Ohio  Valley,  and  New  England. 


474  YEAEE'-'K    OF    THE    DEPABTMEHT    OE   AGRKULTUEE. 


if 


I 


1 
^ 


-  : 


sq — 


-A-r- 

zzz 


i         /  t   . ', 


•  "  "  • -  5     -         •-/"^^.y.      \-Ru41c5i.  I  <?£/>?.     J 


-  -• 


-  ; 


I 


-  5 


<   ^^ 


=1=1 


& 


M^ 


V  U' 


--     -'  :r  ':   ~     -  -    -■     -         a,  zs  z    3   />  :  ^  j:  " ;     J  ;^?7|3   /tf  /7  .z? 


■ 


■  7^ 7 V" 

^    ■■  ^    ■  '     .       ,      ~ 


n=x 


z^v    .■— — y 


■~ZL 


= 


j — ■. 


-  '-  -' " ___: --    -    -C.    1     -JtlI</.        \--/izo?ios?.\    <S\:pi,      vk 


3     IC   2Z  30    7    /4  21    2g    £-    if    IS   ?. ■'     2       '-       -    z;-    ~  -     e     >:   1'   z~    5      :0     -7    1-     fj 





. 


=E 


■^   ._  .  .,.,-•    /  ~^i        ~~^z 


= 


— ' — -i — 


~  ■ .  -•  ..^^ 


— 


^f 


3/6 


■JUv-lC.     : _'__. ->"<£// f. 


0  n  zi 


1VZ 


~ 


r 


J L 


; 


^T7— ; 


B3S 


-3; 


ZEE^^S 


\>r*'  r 


'      "  -      -  j       •  .  •_<.Vc-t-5,  -- 


17. — 1  or 

-  Eu  ;ouri  Valley 


WEATHER    AXD    CROP    COXDITIOXS    IX    1906. 


475 


1 

4 

0 

Jlpr  S  <"' 

Jlpril. 

JtC,<2l/. 

rfjamte*. 

t/rclr/ 

Jill/?ttst. 

Sept. 

^ 

9  \I6 

23 

:<:■ 

7 

1+  \2I 

2« 

4 

// 

/« 

C' 

z 

5  |/^ 

23|50 

6 

13 

;•«> 

2? 

3    \/0  \/7 

8* 

/ 

t 

' 

•  \ 

\ 

-    l 

'■i 

» 

i 

V 

\ 

ft 

\ 

A 

, 

1 

i 

-- 

- 

* 

V 

-£ 

/  \ 

i\ 

A 

■ 

•   ■ 

Zi 

i 

7^ 

'^C^ 

, 

*r\\ 

I  V 

TA 

K  ^ 

k 

r  i 

-  d 

7A 

7^ 

^1 

•^ 

■ 

' 

I    \ 

^ 

^ 

, 

<\ 

I      1 

ri 

■ 

| 

' 

Z^ST 

v     .' 

< 

:• 

7      - 

\ 

i  1 

/ 

^ 

\    '   V 

1 

\' 

•  i 

■     l     ; 

\  / 

,1 

:  i 

1    1    ' 

I 

l 

! 

'.    i   / 

yt 

-I 

\ 

-/a 

> 

1. 

r:: 

i 

/ 

1 

i 

/.3z 

1 

i 

Co 

1SS 

+  5 
0 
5 

-,'C 

iviJVte 

Jlpril. 

JW&a/. 

(Tu^ve-. 

t7j&9/. 

JlltqitSi. 

Sept. 

9  \IS\Z3\30 

7 

/-? 

2/ 

?*' 

■?   |//  |/*J2J 

z 

a  \/6\zs\io 

6 

/J|2<?|^7!3  |V» 

.-; 

M 

/ 

1               1 

i    1       1 

'.- 

I 

1 

>'    i 

,4 

1 

:''  i 

;  ' 

' 

i 

'  ! 

1    , 

1 

1   'I 

'    '1 

1       | 

'    M      1 

1 

'    ','      ' 

1 

i 

1     ';      I     ' 

1 

i 

25 

7T 

t      ,      \     . 

\ 

i 

tx 

1      '     ' 

*i 

- 

IT 

ZI 

i 

~-\ 

■-V 

I 

\ 

/ 

0. 

J\ 

i',    [A 

'>r     < 

_y 

V' 

\ 

i  i 

i  y\ 

,' 

_J(vT 

.- 

-. 

M 

'V 

-". 

.   ■■ 

f  "Jiv 

\\ 

"7" 

7-i 

l     ^ 

lZ 

~\\  i 

V_.' 

\ 

/ 

k' 

\ 

/I 

\ '  .< 

^ 

1 

V 

/i 

\  VI 

• 

s' 

- 

I       1 

1. 

' 

i    j 

I 

■ 

lra 

'-' 

1        ' 

T, 

,  , 

1      i 

r« 

I 

. 

i 

| 

I      i 

i 

K 

w 

0 

JaxJPb 

Jlpril. 

JK.-&?/ 

<Jivrce ',. 

>Ji-Lly. 

Jluu/usl. 

Se'/ 

^ 

9  \/6  Z3 

^J 

7 

■'- 

2/ 

28 

& 

//  |//12J 

Z   \9\16  \23\50 

6 

s 

:-■ 

2? 

3 

/.^ 

/•/ 

2< 

/ 

\ 

1               1       1 

4  _ 

1          1 

/ 

1 

1 

1          1 

I 

i  i 

1     1          1 

i 

J 

• ' 

!   i 

;•  i    1 

1 

1 

a 

\ 

1 

-    7~ 

i 

(Ml          I 

n 

?   '  i 

"M        r 

\ 

74^ 

,1      ' 

l 

I        *  >'  s 

1  — 

— 

~z. 

\ 

\ 

'\ 

^r-; 

/        f 

1 

/" 

^t^\ 

^-~ 

■     \  / 

ZI' 

' 

1 

"ZZ 

. 

rhJ  ! 

_  / 

i    r^, 

-/- 

=P- 

— 

^ — 

/_ 

>H 

~L 

^ 

^^^J 

t^=^i- 

2 

, 

• 

' 

, 

*— 

-   1 

1 

' — / 

r^. 

1 

7—i. 

— *- 

V- 

Arr 

| ; 

I1    /      r 

■ 

\'  /l    / 

■ 

Vi/J-> 

J 

1  'i 

i 

■ 

< 

1 

Wr 

' 

'  ;l 

l,  / 

V 



y~        it    j 

• 

y' 

1*9 

/.0S[         '  V 

i      i 

may 

3 

1 

0 

Jlpril. 

Jllay. 

J'UTt  &. 

tfeclg/. 

JlusQzisi, 

Sept. 

9 

'6    23  \30 

1 j ' 

7 

'-■; 

?/  let 

TT7T 

ft 

^^ 

z 

-; 

H 

: .-'  i  - 

6  j/3 

r.;;.'7 

3 

« 

'7 

Z<» 

/ 

-H- 

■  I 

•  i 

i 

3 

' 

— 

: 

\ 

.- 

^ ., 

, 

— 

—\ 

1 

■-1 

- 

P 

^ 

r 

5 

3./Z 

^ 

\ 

V 

1 
.■ 

1  > 

I  l   , 

4fc 

-^ 

— . 

"v' 

— 

i 

V 

7   - 

^s  — 

: 

1 

1- 

Tt  ?7i,b£7-<i  ficve,  z7i  sti.vrees. Preci£ii<zlio7t,  irUenUas  ofi7 

l 

" 

— » 

Fig.  is.— Temjxr.tture  Lpitatioo  rinohost  departnres  for  the  season  of 

l'JOO  from  the  normal  of  many  yeai  -  .  Idle  and  South  Al  h 


476  YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETME^T    OF    AGEICrLTUEE. 


to 

t 

-.  I 
ft* 

r  : 

■ 
-  : 

■Ji'pril. 

<jyC<ay.  ■ 

JUJLC. 

tTjuZff.      ^Rujyust  |  Se.pl. 

9 

' 

:.r 

:■: 

7 

- 

; 

+ 

•" 

_-/ 

2 

9 

'f  :?i;   j7.':::-.:     .'     "  ,j-« 

1 

\ 

i 

1 

;       •■       ,        j 

,      'J      ! 

1 

'       '          •-         ,         « 

1      2       1                          1           A 

'     •• 

i       1 

\       '             ■ 

i :     k     i     ;     ;     r  \ 

>A 

.^J 

\ 

• 

) 

. 

,  yf    1  A I     f    1  -  \J    /  -                                        ■"           ■          •• 

/ 

,/  !     !  .  \\                V    1    \      1      ii  \  -                         '                   -            i 

/ 

1            '  ■         i                 \      ■-    ,-         ; 

" 

.     '.t     .       '                                     . 

1 

I 

,*  ! 

I  • 

1 

■ 

.     ■ 

i 

1     1 

1      !'• 

1 

•      1 

1          II] 

i 

-1 
if 

I 

H 

g 

-April, 

-./'..-:       |  <Ju7Z€.  |     t7]uZ*/.           7:---\               .    -"       ^ 

3    \/6    T5 

r  ' 

_ 

*|2      2*1^  |  A 

•   :.    Z 

5       5   J'5  ."f't       :    -.'  Z~    J       (5      7:2-f j  / 

i 

' 

i              | 

1'   '  1     '     1 

\ 

i 

. 



;         !    i 

.    '       .               (       I       ,       I       •) 

f.  v 

/      \  : 

'    \ 

\       )                                               ' 

X  > 

i   r».  j 

,     .^'\;    '. 

r »  1            1 

''•'     \   '■        i       ..__   . .  ,  \  .,'. 

• 

n                     m  ™        p      ,       i- 

• 

! 

1 

A1 

\/;i      \    !  /+          ..." 

\    1/  l            i  ' 

1 

■ 

' 

> 

> 

; 

1 

>• 

r.s  z 

i     1 

•a 

1 
2- 

Jl'pr  2  =» 

Ek&uM 

■Jlprii. 

■J/tcty. 

_''7--  ■'   -/ 

<J~Z-t  I 

(TlvC^ljLSt- 

_^  i  :  r     £ 

9  \/6  \23\30 

--:-•: ; 

4          .'  r.r  ^    5     r  :.r  .".    »'  l/5|^i^7lo          "  ;- 

I        1 

1        1       | 

\ 

. 

"V                     — 

-                 1 

1           i        \ 

/   " 

Ail 

1        ]A\ i         !        1    A    1         1 

i.    \      1 

1               !                                                -              -V                '       \      ' 

It        r/  A        '  \             .'    /  tV  i        l 

'     A 

s 

.    9 

V 

. 

■■  \ 

.' 

' 

\    > 

1 

1     ^ 

\/ 

,     ,    ; 

. 

\ 

V 

^      i 

v    ' 

1 

| 

1     1 

ii 

1 

-  & 

0 

\_Jlp 

>JiZ,aj/ 

c^/ 

'July. 

<Jlit£ : 

Sept 

9 

r 

;. 

.". 

7 

/4    2/  |c?# 

4   1 

•■  ■-•"" 

^ 

5-   i/^ 

;T  3* 

r 

:.'  27 

3  1 

o     '  :- 

1 

1 

1 

- 

\ 

;    j 

s 

I                                 ■ .      ; 

.... 

■ 

' 

.  _  . 

1 

N    '!      IA 

•'      ' 

rv  i   k  \ 

'                       . 

/;  \i    1    ,          irn 

171  .               \         J->  '.-" 

— 

y 

ti    ;; 

I 

" 

-- 

i 

t ; 

'  '.I    1: 

1      1      '•'    ' 

■ 

! \- 

1'   / 

. 

l  ' 

\       / 

1 

1 

Si  / 

. 

',    k/ 

. 

••' 

v 

! 

; 

ST|~ 

1 

1 

1    1 

i 

rre77z'f>€-raZuj'c,i7islec??-ees, "Precip:  ,~\ : .'.-      :--  ."«.-., ~-~  .:  :: ' .  : 

Fig.  19.— Temperature  (decrees  Fahrenheit)  and  precipitation  inches')  depart 
19u6  from  the  normal  of  man]  I    The  Lake  region,  the  .ssippi  Valler. 

V  alley,  and  Tennessee. 


■aaaa  :f 
the  Ohio 


Yearbook   U.  S.   Dept.  of  Agriculture,    >9°6 


Plate  xl. 


Yearbook  U.   S.   Dept.  of  Agriculture,    1906. 


Plate  xli. 


Yearbook   U.   S     Dept.  of  Agriculture,    1906. 


Plate  xlii. 


WEATHER   AND    CROP   CONDITIONS   IN    1906.  477 

COLD    WAVES. 

The  first  well-defined  cold  wave  of  the  winter  of  1905-6  advanced  from  Manitoba 
to  the  Atlantic  coast  States  from  the  1st  to  the  3d  of  February,  with  temperature  30° 
below  zero  at  Winnipeg,  Manitoba,  on  the  1st  and  24°  below  zero  at  Sault  Ste.  Marie, 
Mich.,  on  the  2d.  On  the  morning  of  the  3d  the  temperature  was  below  zero  in  the 
interior  of  New  York  and  New  England.  The  line  of  10°  was  traced  through  the  Dis- 
trict of  Columbia  and  southwestern  Virginia  and  the  line  of  freezing  temperature 
through  northwestern  Florida.  From  the  3d  to  the  6th  a  cold  wave  advanced  from  the 
Rocky  Mountains  over  the  central  valleys  and  the  Middle  Atlantic  and  New  England 
States,  carrying  the  line  of  zero  temperature  to  Kansas,  the  Ohio  River,  and  the 
interior  of  New  York  and  New  England.  From  the  13th  to  the  15th  a  cold  wave 
swept  from  British  America  to  the  Atlantic  and  Gulf  coasts,  with  zero  temperature  in 
the  States  of  the  lower  Missouri  Valley  on  the  morning  of  the  14th  and  a  fall  in  tempera- 
ture of  20°  to  30°  in  the  interior  of  the  Atlantic  and  east  Gulf  States  by  the  morning 
of  the  15th.  A  moderate  cold  wave  overspread  the  central  valleys  and  the  eastern 
and  southeastern  States  during  the  26th,  27th,  and  28th,  attended  by  heavy  snow 
from  the  middle  Mississippi  Valley  over  a  great  part  of  the  Ohio  Valley  and  in  southern 
portions  of  the  Middle  Atlantic  States,  and  by  frost  to  the  middle  and  east  Gulf  coasts 
and  northern  Florida. 

Generally  the  precipitation  was  below  the  average,  the  month  being  exceptionally 
dry  in  the  lower  Lake  region,  Ohio  Valley,  and  over  the  greater  part  of  the  interior  of 
the  Atlantic  coast  and  Gulf  districts.  From  the  northern  portion  of  the  central  Gulf 
States  northeastward  to  the  lower  Lake  region  the  deficiency  in  precipitation  ranged 
from  2  to  more  than  4  inches,  the  most  marked  deficiency  occurring  in  Tennessee  and 
the  adjacent  portions  of  Arkansas,  Mississippi,  Alabama,  Georgia,  North  Carolina,  and 
Kentucky.  Over  a  large  part  of  the  eastern  Rocky  Mountain  slope  and  in  the  upper 
Missouri  Valley  the  total  precipitation  for  the  month  amounted  to  less  than  one-fourth 
of  an  inch  and  was  decidedly  below  the  average.  In  the  lower  Missouri  Valley,  por- 
tions of  the  central  Mississippi  Valley,  along  the  immediate  Atlantic  coast  from  New 
Jersey  to  South  Carolina,  and  in  southern  Florida,  the  precipitation  exceeded  the 
average,  the  excess  being  quite  marked  in  eastern  North  Carolina,  southern  Florida, 
and  portions  of  the  central  Missouri  Valley.  More  than  the  average  precipitation  also 
occurred  over  the  southern  portions  of  New  Mexico,  Arizona,  and  California,  in  parts 
of  central  and  northern  California,  and  in  western  Oregon  and  southern  Washington. 

At  the  close  of  the  month  the  area  covered  with  snow  was  generally  confined  to  the 
extreme  northern  districts,  although  portions  of  the  central  Mississippi  and  Ohio  val- 
leys and  the  Middle  Atlantic  States  were  covered  to  considerable  depths.  The 
amount  of  snow  on  the  ground  in  northern  New  England  was  much  less  than  usual 
at  this  time  of  the  season. 

March. 

The  prominent  features  of  March,  1906,  were  abnormally  low  mean  temperature 
during  the  first  and  second  decades,  lack  of  sunshine,  and  generally  excessive  precipi- 
tation, although  the  latter  was  much  below  the  average  on  the  north  Pacific  coast  and 
in  portions  of  the  west  Gulf  States,  and  portions  of  the  Lake  region  and  South  Atlantic 
States  received  less  than  the  average.  Damaging  freshets  occurred  in  California  and 
in  portions  of  the  northern  Rocky  Mountain  region,  upper  Mississippi  Valley,  and 
east  Gulf  States.  There  was  very  general  complaint  of  excessive  cloudiness  and 
moisture  and  of  low  temperatures  in  nearly  all  districts  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains. 

The  month  averaged  colder  than  usual  throughout  the  country,  with  the  exception 
of  a  comparatively  small  area  embracing  the  southern  portions  of  California,  Arizona, 
and  New  Mexico  and  extreme  western  Texas,  where  the  temperature  was  normal  or 
slightly  above.  The  month  was  decidedly  cold  in  the  middle  and  northern  Rocky 
Mountain  regions  and  eastward  over  the  central  valleys  and  the  greater  part  of  the 
Lake  region  and  Atlantic  coast  and  Gulf  districts.  The  region  in  which  the  greatest 
deficiency  occurred  extends  from  Idaho  southeastward  over  the  middle  Rocky  Moun- 
tain slope  and  the  lower  Missouri,  central  Mississippi,  and  lower  Ohio  valleys,  including 
the  western  portion  of  Tennessee  and  the  northern  portion  of  the  central  Gulf  States, 
the  average  daily  temperature  in  these  districts  ranging  from  6°  to  10°  below  the 
normal.  Along  the  immediate  coast  from  Florida  to  southern  New  England  the  tem- 
perature was  generally  below  the  normal,  but  the  departures  were  not  marked. 

FROSTS    AND    LOW   TEMPERATURES. 

The  cold  wave  of  the  closing  days  of  February  caused  heavy  frost  in  extreme  north- 
ern Florida  on  the  morning  of  March  1.  From  the  1st  to  5th  a  moderate  cold  wave 
advanced  from  the  British  Northwest  Territory  to  the  east  Gulf  and  South  Atlantic 


478  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

s,  attended  by  zero  temperature  in  the  extreme  Northwest,  by  falls  in  tempera- 
ture of  10°  to  20°  in  the  central  valleys  and  the  Eastern  State?.  and~by  heavy  frost  on 
the  East  Gulf  coast  and  at  Jacksonville.  The  second  decade  of  the  month  was  excep- 
tionally cold,  "with  heavy  snow,  from  the  middle  and  northern  Plateau  and  Rocky 
Mountain  regions  over  the  States  of  the  Missouri  and  up]  d'pi  valleys  and  the 

northern  Lake  region.  During  this  period  temperatures  20°  to  30°  below  zero  occurred 
in  the  up]  M  --  iri  Valley:  zero  temperatures  were  reported  from  Wyoming,  the 
middle  Miss  ::i  Valley,  Minnesota,  and  upper  Michigan:  and  at  the  close  of  the 
le  the  interior  of  Texas,  the  middle  and  east  Gulf  coasts,  and  extreme  northern 
Florida  were  visited  by  heavy  frost.  From  the  21st  to  23d  a  moderate  cold  wave 
advanced  from  the  British  Northwest  Territory  eastward  over  the  northern  districts. 
No  well-defined  cold  wave  appeared  after  the  23d. 

The  t-  >tal  precipitation  exceeded  the  average  in  the  Middle  Atlami.    Stat        I  »hio. 
tipper  Mississippi  and  Missouri  valleys,  middle  Rocky  Mountain  slope,  middle  and 
southern  Plateau  region.  California,  and  portions  of  the  central  and  east  Gulf  B 
and  Lake  region.     The  monthly  precipitation  ranged  from  6  to  more  than  12  inches  in 
central  and  southern  Mississippi,  central  Alabama,  and  norther:  a        while  the 

Ohio  Valley  and  the  greater  part  of  the  Middle  Atlantic  States  and  New  England 
received  from  4  to  more  than  (i  inches.     There  was  much  less  than  the  average  precip- 
itation in  the  greater  part  of  Texas  and  over  a  narrow  area  extending  thence  to  south- 
rn  Virginia.     On  the  P;.  the  precipitation  was  abnormally  heavy  in 

California,  the  greater  part  of  that  S  iving  from  4  to  12  inches,  while  Oi 

and  Washington  received  much  less  than  the  average. 

At  the  dose  of  the  month  very  little  snow  remained  on  the  ground  in  the  districts 
:  the  Rocky  Mountains,  except  incite  upper  Michigan  Peninsula  alone  the  e 
of  Lake  Superior,  where  the  depth  ranged  from  IS  inches  to  more  than  2  fe  t. 

The  Crop  Seasox.  April-September.  Summary  by  Weeks. 

By  weeks,  ending  with  Monday,  from  April  9  to  October  1.  the  weather  conditions 
may  be  summarized  a*  foil 

April  'j. — Although  there  was  much  cloudiness,  generally  favorable  weather  condi- 
tions prevailed,  especially  during  the  latter  part  of  the  week,  in  the  central  and 
northern  distri  'he  Rocky  Mountain-.     There  was,  however,  to.,  much  rain 

in  portions  of  the  Missouri  and  upper  Mississippi  valleys.     In  the  southwestern  dis- 
tricts, from  Oklahoma  an  -ward  over  the  Plateau  region,  the  week 
.  ad  stormy.     Frosts  occurred  .  :ih  as  the  northern  portions  of  the 
central  and  east  Gulf  districts. 

This  week  averaged  warmer  than  usual  in  the  Lake  region,  central  valleys.  Middle 
Atlantic,  and  central  Gulf  States,  and  on  the  north  and  middle  Pacific  coasts.     The 

--  in  temperature  ranged  from  r  day  in  the  central  valleys,  tl 

part  of  the  Lake  region,  and  along  the  immediate  coasts  of  Washington,  Oregon,  and 
northern  California,  the  most  marked  departures  occurring  in  Minnesota  and  North 
L>akota.  In  northern  New  England  and  the  Florida  Peninsula,  and  over  an  area 
embracing  the  central  and  southern  PL  -   uthern  California,  the  south- 

eastern Rocky  Mountain  slope,  and  erature  averaged  below  the  normal. 

The  precipitation  was  much  above  the  average  over  tin-  -  Plateau  r<  g 

rn  Rocky  Mountain  slope,  the  lower  Missouri  and  upper  Mississippi  valleys, 
and  over  the  greater  part  of  the  Lake  region,  amounts  ranging  from  1  inch  to  2  i: 
being  reported  r  part  of  these  districts.     In  the  Atlantic  and  Gulf  coa«t 

districts,  the  northern  Plateau  region,  and  on  the  Pacific  coast  t:  itation  was 

below  tin-  .  uly  light  showers  occurring  in  the  Middle  Atlantic  States  and  on 

the  north  Pacific  coast,  with  practically  no  rain  over  a  large  part  of  the  South  Atlantic 
and  eat  in  central  and  northern  California,  and  over  much  of  the  northern 

Plateau  region. 

SEVERE    LOCAL    STORMS. 

7  16. — While  this  *  ged  milder  than  usual  throughout  nearly  the  whole 

country,  the  latter  part  was  decidedly  cool,  with  light  to  heavy  frosts  on  the  15th  and 
16th  as  far  south  as  the  northern  portions  of  tin-  Southern  States.     Oomph 
much  rain  were  received  from  the  Middle  Atlami.  1  portions  of  the  Missouri 

Valby.     The  mild  temperatures  and  generally  light  precipitation  in  the  Southern 
•  favorable.     In  the  Missouri  and  upper  Mississippi  valleys  there  was  much 
sunshine,  especially  during  the  fore  pan  of  the  week,  while  in  the  Middle  Atlantic 
■  the  duration  of  sunshine  was  below  the  av.  i 
Violent  and  destructh  i  the  12th  and  13th  in  portions  of  the 

an,  upper  Mississippi,  and  Ohio  valleys  and  west  Gulf  Sta 


WEATHER    AND    CHOP    CONDITIONS    IN    1  479 

The  precipitation  was  very  heavy  in  New  England  and  the  Middle  Atlantic  Sta     - 
where  amounts  generally  ranging  from  1  inch  to  4  inches  were  reported.     1! 
rains  also  occurred  in  portions  of  the  central  Missouri  and  Red  River  of  the  N 
valleys,  and  more  than  the  average  nil  over  a  large  part  of  the  Lake  region,  middle 
Rocky  Mountain  slope,  anil  local  areas  in  the  South  Atlantic  States  and  Texas.     In 
the  Ohio  Valley  and  portions  of  the  tipper  Lake  region  and  upper  Mississippi  Valley 
and  generally  throughout   the  Southern   States  and   the  Plateau  and   Pacific 
regions  the  precipitation  was  below  the  average,  no  appreciable  amount  being  reported 
from  western  Texas,  southwestern  New  Mexico,  the  southern  portions  of  Arizona  and 
California,  northern  California,  the  greater  part  of  Oregon,  eastern  Washington,  north- 
ern Idaho,  and  western  Montana. 

. — During  this  week  much  the  greater  part  of  the  country  experienced  very 
favorable  temperatures,  although  some  complaint  of  cool  w<  ather  during  a  part  of  the 
week  was  received  from  portions  of  the  west  Gulf  and  Atlantic  coast  districts.  There 
ample  sunshine,  except  in  the  central  and  west  Gulf  States,  where  much  of  the 
■work  was  cloudy  or  partly  cloudy.  There  was  an  absence  of  rain  over  a  large  part  of 
the  central  valleys  and  east  Gulf  States  and  New  England,  with  only  light  showers  in 
the  Lake  region  and  Middle  Atlantic  States,  while  heavy  rains  occurred  in  Texas. 
The  need  of  rain  was  beginning  to  be  felt  in  Tenni  -  and  Florida.     F 

g  rieral  occurrence  at  the  beginning  or  close  of  the  wi-vk  in  the  Lake  region. 
Ohio  Valley,  and  the  interior  portions  of  the  Middle  and  South  Atlantic  States. 

low  temperatures:  local  droughts. 

"/  SO. — While  the  temperature  conditions  to  the  eastward  of  the  Rocky  Moun- 
tains were  generally  favorable,  there  was  much  complaint  of  cold  nights  during  the 
fore  part  of  the  week  in  the  districts  east  of  the  Mississippi  River,  light  frost?  occurring 
as  far  south  as  the  Carolinas  and  the  northern  porti  -  G<  rgia  and  Alabama,  with 
heavy  frosts  and  freezing  temperatures  in  the  higher  portions  of  the  more  northerly 
districts.  Over  the  middle  and  southern  Plateau  regions  the  temperatures  were 
asonably  1  ally  during  the  middle  of  the  week,  when  heavy  frosts  were 

general.  The  droughty  conditions  reported  in  the  previous  week  in  Tennessee  and 
portions  of  the  east  Gulf  States  continued,  the  area  needing  rain  being  materially 
increased,  at  this  time  embracing  North  Carolina  and  a  i      -  ble  part  of  the  upper 

ssippi  and  lower  Ohio  valleys.     Severe  local  -  nrred  in  a  number  of  the 

s,  and  also  in  Tennessee  and  northern  Georgia,  from  the  26th  to  the 
2S;h.     As  a  whole,  there  was  ample  sunshine. 

May  7. — This  week  averaged  warmer  than  usual  in  the  middle  and  north  Pacific 

listricts  and  over  the  western  p  irti<  >nsof  the  middle  and  northern  Plateau  regions: 

averaged  warmer  than  usual  in  the  west  Gulf  States  and  in  all  districts  east  of  the 

Mississippi  River,  with  the  exception  of  the  upper  Mississippi  Valley,  the  western 

portion  of  the  upper  Lake  region,  and  the  interior  of  northern  New  England.     In  the 

middle  and  south  Atlantic  coast  districts  and  in  northern  California,  the  temperature 

-  ranged  fn  »m  i>D  to  9°  per  day.  and  it  exceeded  3°  per  day  in  southern  New  England, 
the  upper  Ohio  Valley,  eastern  Tennessee,  and  in  the  central  and  west  Gulf  districts 
and  north  Pacific  coast  region.     In  the  southern  Plateau  region  and  over  the  eastern 

.-  Mountain  slope  and  the  Missouri  and  upper  Mississippi  valleys  the  week  aver- 

colder  than  usual,  the  deficiency  in  temperature  being  less  than  3°  per  day 
most  of  the  area  comprised  by  the  districts  mentioned,  but  ranging  from  3°  to  (i°  per 
day  over  ;;  a  Rocky  Mountain  slope  and  the  upper  Missouri  Valley.     Light  to 

heavy  frosts  were  general  in  the  middle  Rocky  Mountain  districts  and  throughout  the 
Lake  region  and  central  valleys. 

HEAVY    RAINS    IN'    PORTIONS    OF    THE    COTTON    REEL. 

The  rainfall  was  above  the  average  over  the  greater  part  of  the  Southern  States. 
being  exceptionally  heavy  in  the  central  and  northern  portions  of  Alabama  and  V 
sippi  and  in  Arkansas  and  northeastern  Texas,  where  amounts  ranging  from  2  to  ] 
than  S  inches  fell.     Moderate  to  heavy  rains  occurred  in  eastern  Nebraska,  porti 
northwestern  Iowa,  the  central  portions  oi  Illinois  and  Indiana,  the  northern  portions 
of  Minnesota  and  Wisconsin,  and  at  some  stations  in  southern  New  England  and  the 
Middle  Atlantii    -  In  the  lower  Missouri  and  upper  Ohio  valleys,  the  greater 

part  of  the  Lake  region,  the  eastern  portion  of  the  Carolinas.  and  the  Florida  Peninsula, 
along  the  immediate  Gud  a  >ast.  in  western  Texas,  and  generally  throughout  the  Plateau 
and  Pacific  coast  regions,  the  precipitation  was  below  the  average,  no  appreciable 
amounts  of  rain  falling  in  the  southern  Plateau  and  Pacitic  coast  regions,  except  light 
showers  in  southeastern  California.     Excessively  heavy  rains  proved  damaging  over 


480  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

the  northern  portions  of  the  central  Gulf  States.  The  droughty  conditions  in  the  pre- 
vious week  were  very  largely  relieved.  The  greater  part  of  Florida  and  portions  of 
South  Carolina  and  Missouri,  however,  continued  to  need  rain.  There  was  much 
cloudiness  in  the  Lake  region  and  in  portions  of  the  Gulf  States.  The  weather  condi- 
tions on  the  Pacific  coast  were  favorable,  except  cool  nights  in  Washington  and  Oregon. 

UNUSUAL    WARMTH   IX   THE    UPPER    MISSOURI   VALLEY. 

May  14- — This  week  averaged  wanner  than  usual  on  the  north  Pacific  coast,  through- 
out the  Plateau  and  Rocky  Mountain  regions,  and  in  the  Missouri  and  Red  River  of  fhe 
North  valleys.     The  average  daily  -        st  marked  in  the  more  northerly  of 

these  districts  and  ranged  froni  6°  to  9°  from  the  upper  Missouri  Valley  westward  to  the 
rn  portions  :  Oreg  a  and  Washington  and  northern  Nevada.  On  the  southern 
California  coast,  in  the  west  Gulf  States,  and  in  all  districts  east  of  the  Mississippi  River 
the  week  averaged  cooler  than  usual,  being  abnormally  cool  in  the  lower  Lake  reg 
Ohio  Valley,  and  the  Middle  and  South  Atlantic  and  east  Gulf  States,  where  the  defi- 
ciency in  temperature  generally  ranged  from  6°  to  11°  per  day.  being  most  marked  over 
the  interior  portions  of  the  South  Atlantic  and  east  Gulf  States  and  over  the  western  por- 
tion of  northern  Xew  England.  Unusually  high  maximum  temperatures  occurred  in 
the  upper  Missouri  Valley  on  the  10th  and  11th.  when  temperatures  ranging  from  90° 
to  96°  were  reported. 

P       zing  temperatures,  or  temperatures  below  freezing,  occurred  in  the  upper  Mis-- 
souri  Valley,  over  the  greater  part  of  the  Lake  region,  in  the  upper  Ohio  Valley,  in  the 
interior  porti<  »na  of  the  Middle  Atlantic  States,  and  in  northern  New  England.     Killing 
-  were  general  from  the  8th  to  the  11th  throughout  the  central  valleys  and  Atlantic 
districts,  and  light  frosts  occurred  as  far  south  as  the  interior  portions  of  the  cen- 
tral and  east  Gulf  St.     - 

DRY    WEATHER   PREVALENT. 

The  rainfall  w  the  average  in  nearly  all  districts  east  of  the  Rocky  Moun- 

tains. :  being  practically  rainless  over  the  greater  part  of  the  central  an>. 

Gulf  States  and  in  Tennessee  and  in  portions  of  the  lower  Ohio  and  central  Mississippi 
valleys.  The  northern  portion  of  the  upper  Lake  region  and  the  interior  portion  of  the 
Middle  Atlant:      -  received  only  light  -  and  in  places  no  appreciable 

amount.     There  was  more  than  the  average  over  the  southern  portion  of  the  upper  Lake 
region  and  also  in  the  middle  Plateau  region  and  portions  of  California.     Showers, 
m  one-fourth  to  1  inch,  occurred  in  the  north  Pacific  coast  region,  buv 
.  the  precipitation  in  that  region  was  below  the  average.     The  w  much 

drier  than  usual,  being  practically  rainless  in  the  central  and  west  Gulf  States,  Ten- 
.  and  in  portions  of  the  Middle  Atlantic  St.  Ohio  and  central  Missis- 

sippi valleys,  in  all  of  which  districts  rain  was  needed. 

DECIDED  TEMPERATURE  EXTREMI> 

May  91. — This  week  averaged  cooler  than  usual  in  the  central  and  northern  Pacific 

coast  districts  and  over  the  western  portions  of  the  middle  and  northern  Plateau 

s.  the  deficiency  in  temperature  ranging  from  3°  to  8°  per  day  over  the  interior 

portions  of  central  and  northern  California  and  from  3°  to  5°  per  day  in  western  Nevada 

and  in  Oregon  and  the  adjacent  portions  of  Idaho  and  Washington.     On  the  immediate 

west  Gulf  coast  and  in  extreme  southern  Florida  the  week  averaged  slightly  cooler  than 

usual,  but  elsewhere  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  and  over  the  southern  Plateau 

raged  warmer  than  usual,  being  decidedly  warm  over  the  middle 

wtain  slope  and  throughout  the  central  valleys.  Lake  region,  and  Middle 

Atlav  where  the  average  dailv  temperature  excess  eeneralfv  ranged  from  6° 

The  maximum  temperature  records  of  former  years  for  the  second  decade  of  May  were 

led  at  a  number  of  stations  in  the  upper  Mississippi  Valley  on  the  17th  and  1  Sth. 

and  at  some  st.  -  uthern  Xew  England  and  the  Middle  Atlantic  States  on  the 

nd  19th.     Freezing  temperatures  occurred  in  the  middle  Plateau  and  northern 

untain  regions  and  in  the  extreme  northern  districts  eastward  of  the  upper 

iri  Valley,  and  light  to  fa  -         irred  in  the  Dakotas  and  Minnesota  and 

generally  throughout  the  1  \     n  and  northern  Xew  England  on  the  19th  and  20th. 

As  a  whole,  the  week  was  drier  than  usual,  a  large  part  of  the  Atlantic  coast  and 

-  and  portions  of  the  central  valleys  and  the  Lake  region  receiving  no 

appreciable  amount  of  rain.     There  was  also  a  general  absence  of  rain  in  the  southern 

Plateau  and  south  Pacific  coast  regions.     On  the  north  Pacific  coast  the  rainfall  was 


WEATHER    AND    CROP    CONDITIONS    IN    1906.  481 

considerably  above  the  average,  more  than  an  inch  being  reported  from  the  coast  dis- 
tricts of  northern  California,  Oregon,  and  Washington.  Heavy  rains  occurred  in  north- 
ern Texas  and  portions  of  Oklahoma  and  Indian  Territory.  Minnesota,  eastern  North 
Dakota,  Montana,  and  portions  of  South  Dakota,  Iowa,  and  southern  Florida  received 
more  than  the  average.  A  large  part  of  the  central  valleys  and  Middle  Atlantic  States. 
had  now  experienced  a  period  of  more  than  two  weeks  without  appreciable  rainfall, 
and  droughty  conditions,  more  or  less  serious,  prevailed  over  practically  the  whole 
territory  east  of  the  Mississippi  River  and  also  in  portions  of  the  Missouri  Valley  and 
west  Gulf  States. 

May  28. — On  the  Pacific  coast  and  in  the  middle  and  northern  Plateau  and  Rocky 
Mountain  regions  the  week  averaged  much  cooler  than  usual  and  the  precipitation 
was  exceptionally  heavy  for  the  season,  especially  in  California,  over  the  greater  part, 
of  which  State  the  weekly  rainfall  ranged  from  1  inch  to  nearly  4  inches,  the  heaviest, 
that  had  occurred  during  the  last  decade  of  May  in  more  than  twenty  years.  The  week 
was  also  unseasonably  cool  and  wet  in  the  Dakotas,  Minnesota,  and  Wisconsin,  freezing 
temperatures  occurring  in  the  Red  River  of  the  North  and  upper  Missouri  valleys,, 
with  exceptionally  heavy  rains  in  southern  Minnesota.  In  the  lower  Missouri,  cen- 
tral Mississippi,  and  Ohio  valleys,  and  in  the  lower  Lake  region  and  Middle  Atlantic 
States  the  greater  part  of  the  week  was  much  warmer  than  the  average,  but  the  last 
two  days  were  unseasonably  cool,  and  light  frosts  occurred  in  the  central  Missouri  and 
upper  Mississippi  valleys  and  upper  Lake  region. 

HEAVY    RAINS    ON    THE    PACIFIC    COAST   AND    IN    FLORIDA. 

Throughout  the  Pacific  coast  and  middle  and  northern  Rocky  Mountain  regions  and 
also  in  the  upper  Missouri,  upper  Mississippi,  and  Red  River  of  the  North  valleys  the 
rainfall  was  much  above  the  average,  and  over  the  greater  part  of  central  and  northern 
California  it  was  unusually  heavy  for  the  season,  ranging  from  1  to  nearly  4  inches. 
The  total  fall  at  San  Francisco  was  2.6  inches,  which  was  the  heaviest  that  had  occurred 
at  that  place  in  the  third  decade  of  May  since  1884.  While  portions  of  the  central 
Mississippi  and  lower  Ohio  valleys  and  lower  Lake  region  received  very  light  rainfall, 
good  rains  fell  over  most  of  the  country  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains.  Depths  rang- 
ing from  1  to  more  than  3  inches  fell  in  New  England,  while  southern  Georgia 
and  the  greater  part  of  Florida  received  from  2  to  more  than  4  inches,  the  total  fall  at. 
Jacksonville,  Fla.,  exceeding  13  inches.  Portions  of  central  and  northern  Texas  also 
received  more  than  the  average,  but  in  eastern  Texas,  Louisiana,  Arkansas,  and  in 
portions  of  Missouri,  southern  Illinois,  and  the  western  portions  of  Kentucky  and 
Tennessee  the  rainfall  was  very  light.  The  drought  conditions  which  had  become 
severe  in  the  preceding  week  were  wholly  or  partially  relieved  over  the  greater  part 
of  the  area  affected.  Drought  continued,  however,  in  portions  of  the  central  and  west 
Gulf  States,  and  in  portions  of  the  lower  Missouri,  central  Mississippi,  and  lower  Ohio 
valleys. 

June  4. — The  week  ending  June  4,  1906,  as  a  whole,  was  unseasonably  cold  in  the 
Plateau  regions  and  over  the  greater  part  of  California,  and  the  fore  part  of  the  week 
was  also  unseasonably  cold  in  the  northern  districts  eastward  of  the  Rocky  Mountains; 
and  in  the  east  Gulf  States.  Light  to  heavy  frosts  occurred  in  exposed  places  in  the 
Lake  region  and  upper  Ohio  Valley,  and  also  in  portions  of  the  middle  and  northern 
Rocky  Mountain  and  Plateau  regions. 

The  rainfall  was  below  the  average  over  a  large  part  of  the  Gulf  States  and  through- 
out the  Lake  region,  but  was  ample  and  generally  well  distributed  in  New  England, 
the  Middle  Atlantic  States,  the  lower  Ohio  and  central  Mississippi  valleys,  and  over 
the  northern  portion  of  the  west  Gulf  States.  Throughout  the  northern  Plateau  region 
and  the  greater  part  of  the  northern  and  middle  Pacific  coast  districts  the  rainfall  was 
phenomenally  heavy  for  the  season,  especially  in  Idaho  and  the  eastern  portions  of 
Oregon  and  Washington. 

LOCAL    STORMS    AND    DROUGHT. 

Damaging  local  storms  occurred  in  portions  of  the  New  England  and  Middle  Atlantic- 
States  on  May  31  and  June  1. 

Drought  continued  in  northern  Missouri,  extreme  southern  Illinois,  southern  Arkan- 
sas, and  in  portions  of  Florida,  Louisiana,  and  Texas,  being  especially  severe  in  the 
southeastern  part  of  the  last-named  State. 

June  11. — In  the  northern  Rocky  Mountain  region,  the  middle  and  northern  Plateau- 
districts,  and  the  northern  and  middle  Pacific  coast  districts,  the  week  ending  at  8  a.  m.^ 
June  11,  1906,  averaged  cooler  than  usual,  and  was  the  fourth  consecutive  week  in 
which  the  temperature  in  these  districts  had  been  abnormally  low.     The  deficiency 

3    a  1906 31 


482  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    HBPABXMKHI    OP    AGBK'ULTURE. 

in  temperature  -  -  le  and  northern 

bh  regions  and  the  interior  of  nonhern  California.     Over  the  s- 'inheastern  B 
Mountain  slope,  the  ]  Valley,  weat  Gttlf  Staf  ..:d  of 

--ppi  River,  with  ti:  week  was 

warn  rature  ex  :nuch 

B  named.  I  res  occurring  in  the 

Lake  region,  Ohio  Valley,  and  pon-      -  Middle  A 

Unseasonably  high  maximum  temperatures  occurred  n 
Gulf  States       at    sfc       «  from  New       leans,  La.,  1  - 

ratures  equal  :  -ling  the  1.:.  orded  m  the  first  d 

ne.     Freezing  I  curred  over  limited  areas  in  the  I  rrion. 

where,  however,  the  minimui^  aged  from  343  to  40°. 

71X1  "ATIOX 

The  ereater  part  of  Nehraaa  ~a  and  p  nonhern  Illinois,  north- 

rthern  Virginia  i  s  ."din 

southeastern  Texas  and  in  per  e  central  Guli  ■  m  Kansas 

and  pen  ions  of  the  a  y  and  up:  red  from  fa 

rains  and  fresh     - 

.  ler  than  I  northern  Cali- 

fornia, on  the  north  I  a  nearly  all  Ifoun- 

ficieney  in  temperature  r.    _ 
fthedistri  \  - 

memo,  central  1  southern  :'  the  Lake 

a,  and  the  interior   .  f  the  Middle  Allan"       3  /.and. 

Over  the  eastern  Rocky  Mountain  slope,  southern  Plateau  I  I 

fornia,  on  the  and  in  extreme  eastern  M..  -aged 

_    tly  warmer  than  tisu.  . 

lay. 
y  high  maximum  temperatures  occurred  in  the  Rio  Grande  V 

\  -  ranged  f  r 
110°.     Uaaeaaoi  minimum  temperatures  occurr-  I    a  til      -  "the 

Lake  region,  upper  Ohio  Valley,  nonhern  portion  of  the  Middle  Atlar 
and  in  Xew  England,  numerous  stations  reporting  the  lowest  readings  yet  recorded 
in  the  second  d-  ase. 

heavy  Kama  ix  the  atiaxt: 

General];  _  ,  thvataceoac 

-  ater  part  of  the  east  Gulf  States,  the  ra:  :.iuch 

_ 
Florida,  and  eastern  Ala'oama.  in  portions  9  front  4 1 

more  than  11  inches  was  ad  Oregon. 

north  .  n  Kansas  northward 

the  eastern  porf  -rage 

rainfall.     From  the  west  Gulf  Lake  region  the  precip: 

Plateau  r  a 
ver  a  large  part  of  T  an  area  exten<      _  Arkansas  north- 

to  Minn-  -  rainfall. 

■■and  in  places  by  hail.  Lake 

:  and  Middle  Atlantic  St.     - 

COOL    WEATHER    EH    THE    IXTEV. 

—1  ek  ending  .  25  avenged  w    mer  than  usual 

Atlantic.  Gulf,  and  Pacr  -  -    :n  which  rage  daily 

temperatui  --  Sacn  here 

it  amounted  to  7°.     Over  tlv  ice  region  the 

average  daily  temperature  lor  the  week  was  nearly  normal.     ;  week 

aver:..  :  than  usual,  being  decidedly  cool  <>n  the  northerr. 

and  from  the  upper  Ohio  Valley  westward  to  the  central  and  nonhern  F 
Throughout  the  central  valleys  and  middle  8  main  region  th-  •     daily 

temperature  deficiency  amour  r  more,  and  in  the  northern  B  ntain 

region  and  the  upper  ■uaaottii  Valley  it  ranged  imrn  9°  to  12L  the  mffl  marked  depar- 
tures from  the  normal  occurring  in  th<  M  raska.  Wj  -  and  eastern 
Montana. 


WEATHER    AND    CBCBP    CONDITIONS    TX    1<X)6.  483 

Unusually  high  maximum  temperatures  occurred  in  California  and  southern  Ari- 
zona on  the  18th.  Freezing  temperatures  occurred  in  Wyoming,  and  minimum  tem- 
peratures below  40°  were  reported  from  a  large  part  of  the  Plateau  region  and  from  the 
northern  portion  (A  North  Dakota.  In  the  Middle  Rocky  Mountain  region  and  central 
Missouri  and  central  Mississippi  valleys  the  minimum  temperatures  on  the  20th.  21st, 
24th,  and  25th  were  unseasonably  low,  numerous  stations  reporting  the  lowest  yet 
recorded  in  the  last  decade  of  June. 

The  rainfall  was  below  the  average  over  an  area  embracing  the  southern  portion  of 
the  upper  Lake  region  and  the  northern  portions  of  Illinois,  Indiana,  and  northwestern 
()hi».  The  rainfall  was  also  below  the  average  on  the  southern  New  England  coast 
and  generally  throughout  the  Southern  States,  although  the  eastern  portion  of  the 
Carolinas.  southern  Florida,  and  scattered  areas  of  limited  extent  in  the  central  and 
•  iulf  States  received  more  than  the  average.  Over  a  large  part  of  the  central  and 
west  Gulf  States  there  was  no  appreciable  rainfall,  and  similar  conditions  prevailed 
in  the  middle  and  s outturn  Plateau  and  Pacific  coast  districts.  Very  heavy  rains 
fell  in  the  lower  Missouri,  central  Mississippi,  and  Ohio  valleys.  Middle  Atlantic 
States,  and  over  the  greater  part  of  New  England,  from  2  to  4  inches  being  reported 
from  the  lower  Missouri  Valley  and  from  1  inch  to  more  than  2  inches  in  the  Ohio 
Valley  and  the  Middle  Atlantic  States.  Considerably  more  than  the  average  rainfall 
occurred  in  the  Red  River  of  the  North  Valley  and  over  the  northern  portion  of  the 
upper  Lake  region.  The  droughty  conditions  prevailing  in  the  previous  week  in  the 
upper  Mississippi  and  lower  Missouri  valleys  were  largely  relieved,  but  drought  con- 
tinues generally  unbroken  in  Louisiana  and  southern  and  eastern  Texas,  while  por- 
tions of  northwestern  Missouri  and  southern  Mississippi  and  central  and  western 
Tennessee,  Oklahoma,  and  western  South  Dakota  needed  rain. 

Numerous  local  storms  of  considerable  severity,  in  places  accompanied  by  hail, 
occurred  in  the  Ohio  Valley  and  Middle  Atlantic  States  during  the  latter  part  of  the 
week. 

Jubj  t. — This  week  was  warmer  than  usual  in  the  Lake  region,  central  valleys, 
Atlantic  coast,  districts,  and  over  the  southeastern  Rocky  Mountain  slope.  The  aver- 
age daily  temperature  excess  was  most  marked  over  an  area  extending  from  the  middle 
Atla&tk  coast  westward  to  the  central  Mississippi  Valley,  including  a  part  of  the  upper 
Lake  region,  where  it  ranged  from  3°  to  6°.  The  temperature  averaged  nearly  normal 
in  the  west  Gulf  States  and  on  the  northern  California  roost.  The  week  was  cooler 
than  usual  on  the  north  Pacific  coast,  over  the  greater  part  of  California,  throughout 
the  Plateau  and  Rocky  Mountain  regions,  and  in  the  upper  Missouri  Valley.  The 
average  daily  deficiency  in  temperature  amounted  to  3°  or  more  over  the  greater  part 
of  the  Plateau  regions  and  exceeded  6°  in  portions  of  California.  Nevada.  Utah,  Wyo- 
ming, and  Montana. 

The  rainfall  exceeded  the  average  in  the  lower  Missouri,  upper  Mississippi,  and 
Red  River  of  the  North  valleys,  southern  New  England.  Louisiana,  and  eastern  Texas, 
and  over  limited  areas  in  the  South  Atlantic  and  east  (lulf  States.  Portions  of  Kansas, 
Nebraska,  Iowa,  northern  Illinois,  South  Carolina.  Louisiana,  and  Texas  received 
amounts  ranging  from  2  to  more  than  4  inches.  There  was  also  more  than  the  average 
precipitation  on  the  extreme  north  Pacific  coast  and  over  a  considerable  part  of  the 
northern  Plateau  region.  Over  most  of  the  Middle  and  South  Atlantic  and  east  Gulf 
States,  and  in  the  Ohio  and  central  Mississippi  valleys,  and  central  portion  of  the  Lake 
region  the  rainfall  was  below  the  average,  no  appreciable  amount  having  fallen  in 
southern  Florida,  eastern  Kentucky,  and  in  portions  of  southern  Illinois. 

LOCAL    DROVGHT    RELIEVED. 

The  prolonged  drought  in  Texas.  Louisiana,  and  northwestern  Missouri  was  largely 
relieved.  There  was  now  sufficient  moisture  for  present  needs  in  all  districts  east  of 
the  Rocky  Mountains,  with  the  exception  of  southern  Florida,  Tennessee,  and  portions 
of  the  Ohio  Valley,  and  apparently  no  section  was  suffering  as  a  result  of  heavy 
preeipitation. 

Wlide  local  storms,  in  places  accompanied  by  hail,  occurred  during  the  latter  part 
of  the  week  in  the  Missouri  and  upper  Mississippi  valleys.  Lake  region,  and  Middle 
Atlantic  States,  they  were  not  unusually  destructive. 

July  9. — The  week  ending  July  9  was  abnormally  cool  in  the  middle  and  southern 
Rocky  Mountain  regions  and  throughout  the  central  valleys.  Lake  region,  and  greater 
part  of  the  middle  Atlantic  coast  districts.  Very  general  complaints  of  cool  nights 
were  received  from  the  central  valleys,  west  Gulf  States,  and  southern  Rocky  Moun- 
tain region,  and  while  the  temperature  conditions  were  not  conducive  to  rapid  growth 
of  vegetation,  they  were  especially  favorable  for  harvesting.  On  the  north  Pacific 
OOtsI  the  week  was  exceptionally  hot  and  dry. 


4S4  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

HIGH    TEMrERATl  KES    IX    THE    PACIFIC    C<  'AST    REGION8. 

July  16. — In  the  Lake  region  and  upper  Ohio  Valley  and  on  the  west  Gulf  coast  the 
temperature  averaged  slightly  above  the  normal.  Elsewhere  east  of  the  Rocky 
Mountains  the  week  averaged  cooler  than  usual,  the  deficiency  in  temperature  over 
the  eastern  Rocky  Mountain  slope,  lower  Missouri  Valley,  and  the  interior  portions  of 
the  central  and  east  Gulf  States  generally  ranging  from  3°  to  (>D  per  day.  the  most 
marked  depart  ures  occurring  over  the  middle  E<  >eky  M<  luntain  slope.  Over  the  west- 
ern portions  of  the  Plateau  districts  and  in  the  Pacific  coast  States,  except  along  the 
central  California  coast,  the  week  averaged  warmer  than  usual,  being  decidedly  warm 
over  the  interior  of  central  and  northern  California  and  in  Washington  and  Or  g 
where  the  temperature  excess  ranged  from  3°  to  12°  per  day. 

Unusually  high  maximum  temperatures  occurred  in  the  middle  and  north  Pacific 
coast  regions,  readings  ranging  from  100°  to  10S°  occurring  in  central  and  northern 
California,  and  from  l00°  to  104°  in  portions  of  Oregon  and  AVashington.  At  Rosebtirg, 
Oreg..  the  maximum  of  102°  on  the  12th  was  2°  higher  than  any  maximum  previ 
recorded  at  that  station  in  the  second  decade  of  July.  The  minimum  temperature-  on 
the  morning  of  the  16th  in  the  upper  Mississippi  Valley  were  unusually  low.  52°  at 
Des  Moines.  Iowa,  corresponding  to  the  lowest  minimum  temperature  previously 
recorded  at  that  station  in  the  second  decade  of  July. 

HEAVY    RAINS    IX    THE    GULF    STATES. 

Over  most  of  the  Gulf  States  the  rainfall  exceeded  the  average  and  in  many  places 
was  excessively  heavy,  although  scattered  areas  received  less  than  the  average.  North- 
ern Florida  and  portions  of  Georgia.  Alabama,  Louisiana,  and  Texas  received  amounts 
ranging  from  2  to  more  than  6  inches,  the  heaviest  occurring  in  northern  Florida,  where 
a  fall  of  more  than  S  inches  was  reported.  The  Middle  Atlantic  States  and  portions  of 
the  Mississippi  and  Central  Missouri  valleys  and  upper  Lake  region  also  received  i 
than  the  average  precipitation,  but.  as  a  whole,  there  was  less  than  the  average  in  the 
central  valleys.  Lake  region,  and  northern  portion  of  the  Middle  Atlantic  States. 
Light  showers,  giving  from  0.1  to  0.5  inch,  occurred  on  the  north  Pacific  coast  and 
over  the  southern  Plateau  region. 

Droughty  conditions  existed  to  a  considerable  extent  in  the  southern  portion  of  the 
upper  Lake  region,  in  parts  of  the  lower  Missouri  and  central  Mississippi  valleys,  and 
in  the  northern  portion  of  the  Middle  Atlantic  States. 

As  in  the  preceding  week,  local  storms  were  comparatively  few  and  caused  very 
little  damage. 

July  23. — Generally  throughout  the  Plateau  districts  and  in  the  Lake  region.  New 
England,  and  the  Middle  Atlantic  States,  the  temperature  during  this  week  was  ah  rye 
the  normal,  the  excess  ranging  from  3°  to  6°  per  day  in  the  northern  Plateau  region  and 
from  2"  to  4°  in  the  Lake  region.  Xew  England,  and  the  northern  portion  of  the  Middle 
Atlantic  States.  In  the  lower  Missouri,  central  Mississippi,  and  Ohio  valleys  and  the 
South  Atlantic  States,  and  on  the  Pacific  (.oast,  the  temperature  was  nearly  normal. 
In  the  central  Missouri  Valley  and  the  central  and  west  Gulf  States  the  week  was 
cooler  than  usual,  the  average  daily  deficiency  generally  ranging  from  1°  to  5°. 

In  the  Middle  Atlantic  States.  Ohio  Valley,  and  Tennessee,  and  over  the  greater  part 
of  the  Gulf  States,  the  precipitation  during  the  week  was  in  excess  of  the  av 
being  unusually  heavy  in  portions  of  the  Middle  and  South  Atlantic  and  Gulf  States. 
Kansas,  eastern  Nebraska,  and  portions  of  the  Lake  region  and  upper  Mississippi 
Valley  also  received  more  than  the  average  rainfall,  but  over  the  greater  part  of  the 
Lake  region  and  upper  Mississippi  Valley  there  was  less  than  the  average. 

DROUGHT    IX    rORTIOXS    OF    THE    COKX    BELT. 

Northeastern  Missouri  and  portions  of  Iowa.  Illinois.  Indiana,  and  the  Dak 
needed  rain,  drought  being  quite  severe  in  northeastern  Missouri  and  the  central- 
western  counties  oi  Illinois,  but  elsewhere  in  the  principal  agricultural  States   ( 
was  ample  moisture,  heavy  rains  having  occurred  from  the  central  and  west   Gulf 
coasts  northeastward  to  the  lower  Lake  region,  in  the  Middle  and  South  Atlantic  Suites, 
and  in  southwestern  Missouri  and  central  Ksmtem. 

Damaging  local  storms  attended  the  heavy  rainfall  in  the  South  Atlantic  anu 
Cult  States,  and  hailstorms  caused  considerable  damage  in  Kansas. 

The  general  weather  conditions  on  the  Pacihe  coast  were  favorable,  although  very 
high  temperatures  occurred  in  central  and  northern  California,  western  Idaho,  and  the 
eastern  portions  of  Oregon  and  Washington. 

July  SO. — Throughout  the  central  valleys  and  Atlantic  coast  districts  and  over  the 
greater  part  of  the  Lake  region  and  Gulf  States  this  week  averaged  cooler  than  usual, 


WEATHER    AND    CROP    CONDITIONS    IN    1906.  485 

the  mean  temperature  being  considerably  below  the  normal  in  the  central  valleys 
and  over  the  northern  part  of  the  middle  and  west  Gulf  districts.  In  the  Rocky 
Mountain  and  Plateau  regions  and  in  the  Pacific  States,  except  on  the  immediate 
coast,  the  week  was  hot  and  generally  dry. 

East  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  both  the  maximum  and  minimum  temperatures  were 
lower  than  usual,  the  maximum  not  exceeding  80°  at  some  stations  in  the  Lake  region 
and  on  the  New  England  and  middle  Atlantic  coasts,  and  being  below  90°  elsewhere, 
except  in  the  Gulf  States  and  at  a  few  stations  in  the  central  Mississippi  and  Missouri 
valleys,  where  they  ranged  from  90°  to  9S°.  Some  high  maximum  readings,  ranging 
from  100°  to  112°,  were  reported  from  the  northern  and  southern  Plateau  regions  and 
from  the  interior  of  central  and  northern  California,  the  highest  occurring  at  Phoenix, 
Ariz.,  where  the  previous  maximum  record  for  the  last  decade  of  July  was  exceeded 
by  1°. 

DROUGHT    IX    CENTRAL    VALLEYS;      TOO    MUCH    RAIN    IN    GULF    STATES. 

Much  of  the  South  Atlantic  and  east  Gulf  States  and  portions  of  the  central  and 
west  Gulf  State;?  suffered  to  some  extent  from  heavy  rains,  while  moisture  was  gener- 
ally needed  in  the  upper  Missouri  Valley  and  over  a  considerable  part  of  the  lower 
Missouri,  central  Mississippi,  and  Ohio  valleys,  drought  being  serious  in  the  greater 
part  of  northern  Missouri.  The  area  now  affected  by  drought  in  the  central  valleys 
was  less  than  in  the  previous  week,  but  in  the  upper  Missouri  Valley  the  area  needing 
rain  apparently  was  greater. 

A  few  severe  local  storms  occurred,  mostly  in  the  South  Atlantic  States  and  upper 
Missouri  Valley,  but  as  a  whole  the  week  was  comparatively  free  from  storms  of  this 
class. 

TEMPERATURE    CONDITIONS    FAVORABLE. 

August  6. — During  the  week  ending  August  6  the  temperature  averaged  much  above 
the  normal  in  the  central  valleys.  Lake  region,  and  Middle  Atlantic  States,  in  which 
districts  the  preceding  week  for  the  most  part  was  decidedly  cool,  while  the  tempera- 
ture was  generally  deficient  in  the  Rocky  Mountain  and  Pacific  coast  districts,  where 
in  the  preceding  week  it  was  mostly  above  the  normal.  Generally  the  temperature 
conditions  throughout  the  country  were  favorable. 

The  Atlantic  coast  districts,  with  the  exception  of  northern  New  England,  suffered 
from  excessive  moisture,  while  portions  of  the  lower  Missouri,  central  Mississippi, 
and  Ohio  valleys  continued  in  need  of  rain,  drought  being  very  severe  in  portions  of 
Missouri,  Illinois,  and  Indiana.  Drought  was  also  prevalent  on  the  north  Pacific 
coast,  and  forest  fires  were  burning  in  Oregon. 

The  week  was  comparatively  free  from  local  storms. 

Light  frost  occurred  on  July  31  and  August  1  in  the  upper  Michigan  Peninsula. 

DROUGHT    LARGELY    RELIEVED    IN    CENTRAL    VALLEYS. 

August  13. — Except  in  the  northern  Plateau  and  north  Pacific  coast  regions,  where 
the  week  was  very  hot.  the  temperature  conditions  were  very  favorable. 

The  droughty  conditions  prevailing  in  portions  of  the  lower  Missouri,  central  Missis- 
sippi, and  Ohio  valleys  in  the  preceding  week  were  relieved,  except  in  northwestern 
Missouri.  Parts  of  the  South  Atlantic  and  east  Gulf  States  and  scattered  localities  in 
Tennessee  were  beginning  to  need  rain,  while  dry  weather  and  sunshine  would  have 
proved  beneficial  in  the  Middle  Atlantic  States.  Ohio  Valley,  and  portions  of  Texas. 
Portions  of  the  lower  Missouri  and  upper  Mississippi  valleys,  upper  Lake  region,  and 
Middle  Atlantic  States  Buffered  from  excessive  rains.  Droughty  conditions  in  Wash- 
ington were  relieved  in  part,  but  in  Oregon  drought  continued,  only  light  showers 
having  occurred  in  northeastern  counties. 

Notwithstanding  the  heavy  rainfall  over  a  large  part  of  the  country,  the  week  was 
comparatively  free  from  storms  of  a  damaging  character. 

HIGH  TEMPERATURES  PREVALENT. 

August  20. — The  States  of  the  Missouri  Valley  and  the  northern  Rocky  Mountain 
region  experienced  the  warmest  weather  of  the  season  during  this  Aveek.  and  the 
mean  temperature  was  decidedly  above  the  normal  throughout  the  central  valleys 
and  Lake  region.  Very  high  maximum  temperatures,  ranging  from  95°  to  more  than 
100°,  occurred  in  the-  upper  Missouri  Valley,  some  damage  having  lieendone  by  hot. 
winds  in  North  Dakota.  From  the  west  Gulf  coast  to  southeastern  California  and  on 
the  north  Pacific  coast  the  week  averaged  somewhat  cooler  than  usual. 


486  YEARBOOK    OF    THK    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Light  frost  occurred  in  elevated  district?  in  Utah,  also  in  Maine  and  New  Hampshire 
on  the  morning  of  the  16th,  and  minimum  temperatures  nearly  low  enough  for  frost 
were  reported  from  the  higher  districts  in  the  eastern  and  northern  portions  of  New 
York. 

The  Missouri  Valley,  the  lower  Lake  region.  New  England,  the  northern  part  of  the 
Middle  Atlantic  States,  and  the  greater  part  of  the  Gulf  States  and  upper  Lake  region 
received  less  than  the  average  rainfall  during  the  week,  no  appreciable  amount  having 
occurred  over  the  northern  part  of  the  Middle  Atlantic  States  and  southern  New 
England.  There  was  also  a  general  absence  of  rain  over  a  large  area  extending  from 
west  em  Texas  northward  to  eastern  South  Dakota.  Heavy  rains  occurred  in  Virginia. 
North  Carolina,  portions  of  South  Carolina,  the  interior  of  the  central  and  east  Gulf 
States.  Ohio  Valley,  and  portions  of  the  upper  Mississippi  Valley,  in  which  districts 
amounts  ranging  from  1  inch  to  more  than  4  inches  fell.  The  Plateau  regions,  espe- 
cially the  central  and  southern,  received  much  more  than  the  usual  rainfall,  nearly  2 
inches  being  reported  from  Yuma.  Ariz.  There  was  no  appreciable  rainfall  on  the 
Pacific  coast,  except  in  extreme  northwest  Washington. 

The  central  Missouri  Valley,  northern  New  England,  a  large  part  of  the  Lake  region. 
and  local  areas  in  the  east  Gulf  States  needed  rain;  elsewhere  cast  of  the  Rocky  Moun- 
tains there  was  sufficient  moisture,  portions  of  North  Carolina  having  suffered  from 
excessive  rains.     Rain  was  badly  needed  on  the  north  Pacific  coast. 

Local  storms  of  considerable  severity  occurred  in  the  Ohio  and  upper  Mississippi 
valleys. 

August  27.-  This  week  was  cooler  than  usual  in  the  valleys  of  the  Red  River  of 
the  North  and  the  upper  Missouri,  throughout  the  Rocky  Mountain  and  Plateau 
regions,  and  in  California,  and  there  was  a  slight  deficiency  in  temperature  in  por- 
tion- of  Oklahoma  and  north  central  Texas  and  over  the  greater  part  of  the  Florida 
Peninsula.  Generally  throughout  the  Plateau  and  Rocky  Mountain  regions  and  in 
the  upper  Missouri  Valley  the  average  daily  temperature  deficiency  ranged  from  3° 
to  more  than  if0,  the  most  marked  departures  occurring  over  portions  of  Montana  and 
Idaho.  Over  the  western  portions  of  Oregon  and  Washington  the  temperature  aver- 
aged slightly  above  the  normal.  From  the  lower  Missouri  Valley  southward  to  the 
west  Gulf  coast  and  in  the  districts  east  of  the  Mississippi  River,  with  the  exception 
of  Florida,  the  week  was  warmer  than  usual,  being  decidedly  warm  in  the  upper 
Mississippi  and  Ohio  valleys  and  Lake  region  and  over  the  interior  portions  of  the 
Middle  Atlantic  States  and  New  England,  where  the  average  daily  temperature  excess 
ranged  from  0°  t  o  9°. 

UNUSUALLT    HEAVY    RAINS    IX    MONTANA,    UTAH,    AND    NEW    MEXICO. 

During  the  week  there  was  less  than  the  average  precipitation  in  New  England, 
the  lower  Lake  region,  portions  of  the  upper  Lake  region  and  upper  Mississippi  and 
central  Missouri  valleys,  and  over  a  large  part  of  the  central  and  west  Gulf  States, 
although  limited  areas  in  all  these  districts  received  good  rains,  the  average  amount 
falling  in  some  places.  There  was  also  less  than  the  average  rainfall  in  the  upper 
Ohio  Valley,  the  eastern  portions  of  Kentucky  and  Tennessee,  the  western  portions 
of  Virginia  and  North  Carolina,  and  on  the  north  Pacific  coast.  The  Middle  and 
South  Atlantic  States,  lower  Ohio  and  central  Mississippi  valleys,  lower  and  upper 
portions  of  the  Missouri  Valley,  and  the  northern  portion  of  the  west  Gulf  States 
received  more  than  the  average  rainfall,  very  heavy  rains  having  fallen  in  portions  of 
the  Middle  and  Smith  Atlantic  States,  lower  Missouri  Valley,  and  in  portions  of  South 
Dakota.  Kansas.  Missouri,  and  Arkansas.  There  was  also  more  than  the  average  pre- 
cipitation throughout  the  States  of  the  eastern  Rocky  Mountain  slope  and  in  the 
middle  and  northern  Plateau  regions,  more  than  an  inch  of  rain  being  reported  from 
portions  of  Utah,  New  Mexico,  and  western  Montana,  where  such  rainfalls  are  very 
unusual.  Dry  weather  continued  on  the  north  Pacific  coast,  where  rain  was  also  much 
needed.  Rainfalls  unusually  heavy  for  that  region,  ranging  from  one-half  inch  to  more 
than  an  inch,  occurred  over  a  large  part  of  the  Plateau  districts. 

TOO    MUCH    RAIN    IX    MIDDLE    ATLANTIC    STATES. 

Septembers. — While  the  fore  part  of  this  week  was  unseasonably  cool  in  the  central 
valleys  and  Lake  region,  as  a  whole  the  temperature  conditions  in  the  districts  east 
of  the  Rocky  Mountains  were  favorable.  Light  frosts  occurred  in  the  Dakotas  and 
Minnesota,  upper  Michigan,  and  northern  New  England.  Over  the  southern  Plateau 
region  the  temperature  averaged  unusually  low.  and  light  to  heavy  frosts  occurred  in 
Utah  and  Arizona. 


WEATHER    AXD    CHOP    CONDITIONS    IX    1906.  487 

Excessive  moisture  proved  unfavorable  in  the  Middle  Atlantic  State-,  while  the 
central  Gulf  States  and  parts  of  the  Missouri  Valley  and  New  England  needed  rain. 
Elsewhere  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  the  rains  were  generally  well  distributed, 
ample,  and  not  harmful.  Little  or  no  rain  fell  on  the  Pacitic  coast  and  drought  con- 
tinued in  Washington  and  Oregon. 

The  week  was  almost  wholly  free  from  local  storms  of  severity. 

UNUSUAL    WARMTH  THROUGHOUT   THE   COUNTRY 

September  10. — Throughout  nearly  the  whole  country  the  week  ending  September 
10  was  unusually  warm,  the  mean  temperature  ranging  "from  (>°  to  more  than  12°  above 
the  normal  from  the  Lake  region  westward  to  Idaho.  In  California,  southwestern 
Texas,  and  northern  New  England  the  week  averaged  slightly  cooler  than  usual. 
Light  frosts  occurred  during  the  fore  part  of  the  week  in  parts  of  the  upper  Lake 
region  and  northern  Xew  England,  and  during  the  latter  part  of  the  week  in  the 
southern  Plateau  region,  eastern  Oregon,  and  Idaho. 

NEEDED    RAINS    ON    NORTH    PACIFIC    COAST. 

The  week  was  practically  rainless  in  most  of  the  northern  districts  east  of  the  Rocky 
Mountains  and  also  over  the  middle  and  southern  Plateau  regions  and  in  California. 
Heavy  rains  occurred  in  Texas,  Tennessee,  portions  of  the  east  Gulf  States,  and  over 
limited  areas  in  Missouri,  Arkansas,  and  eastern  North  Carolina,  causing  local  damage 
in  portions  of  Texas  and  Alabama.  Rain  was  much  needed  in  northern  Xew  England, 
portions  of  the  Lake  region  and  upper  Mississippi  Valley,  and  in  the  northern  Rocky 
Mountain  region.  Good  rains  terminated  the  drought  in  western  Washington  and 
showers  afforded  needed  relief  in  Oregon. 

September  17. — This  week  was  abnormally  cool  in  the  Plateau  and  Rocky  Mountain 
regions,  but  in  the  districts  to  the  eastward  it  averaged  much  warmer  than  usual, 
although  cool  during  the  latter  part  in  the  more  northerly  districts.  Light  frosts 
occurred  on  the  13th  and  14th  in  the  Dakotas,  Minnesota,  and  upper  Lake  region,  and 
on  the  loth  at  a  few  places  in  the  lower  Lake  region  and  northern  Xew  England. 
Freezing  temperatures  occurred  over  a  large  part  of  the  Plateau  and  northern  Rocky 
Mountain  regions. 

Parts  of  Xew  England,  the  Lake  region,  Ohio  Valley.  Tennessee,  and  central  and 
east  Gulf  States  needed  rain:  elsewhere  the  rainfall  was  generally  ample.  Good  rains 
fell  on  the  north  Pacific  coast  and  generally  throughout  the  Plateau  and  Rocky  Moun- 
tain regions,  and  very  heavy  rains  occurred  in  Oklahoma,  western  Kansas,  Nebraska, 
eastern  South  Dakota,  southern  Minnesota,  and  western  Iowa. 

September  24- — Over  most  of  the  country  this  week  averaged  warmer  than  usual, 
the  temperature  excess  being  very  decided  in  the  districts  east  of  the  Mississippi 
River  and  from  Minnesota  westward  to  the  north  Pacific  coast.  The  week  was  some- 
what cooler  than  usual  from  the  central  Missouri  Valley  westward  over  the  middle 
Rocky  Mountain  region,  including  the  northern  portion  of  the  southern  Plateau 
region.  Xo  freezing  temperatures  were  reported  from  stations  within  the  United 
States,  the  lowest,  34°,  being  reported  from  the  Yellowstone  National  Park.  Wyo., 
and  Northfield,  Vt..  and  no  frost  occurred  in  the  districts  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains. 
but  light  to  heavy  frosts  occurred  in  the  higher  portions  of  Nevada,  Utah,  Arizona, 
and  Xew  Mexico. 

Heavy  rains  occurred  in  the  east  Gulf  States,  in  portions  of  the  Carolinas.  Tennessee, 
and  Kentucky,  in  southern  Xew  England,  and  over  an  area  extending  from  Oklahoma 
northward  to  eastern  South  Dakota.  In  these  districts  amounts  ranging  from  1  inch 
to  more  than  3  inches  are  reported.  There  was  more  than  the  average  over  local  anas 
in  the  Lake  region  and  central  and  west  Gulf  States.  In  the  Middle  Atlantic  States 
and  Florida  and  generally  throughout  the  Lake  region,  central  valleys,  and  west 
Gulf  districts,  the  rainfall  was  below  the  average,  areas  of  considerable  extent  in  Texas 
and  the  central  Mississippi  Valley  receiving  no  appreciable  amount.  There  was  a 
general  absence  of  rain  throughout  the  Plateau  regions  and  in  southern  California. 
Light  showers  giving  from  one-fourth  to  one-half  inch  occurred  in  the  middle  and 
northern  Pacific  coast  districts. 

DAMAGE    BY    HIGH    WINDS. 

On  the  17th  the  Carolinas  suffered  considerably  from  the  high  winds  accompanying 
the  tropical  storm  off  the  south  Atlantic  coast  on  that  date,  and  heavy  rains  and  high 
winds  in  Minnesota  on  the  20th  caused  much  damage. 


488  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

DAMAGING    STORM    IN"    CENTRAL    AND    EAST    GULF    DISTRICTS. 

October  1. — During  this  week  the  rainfall  was  very  heavy  from  the  central  and  east 
Gulf  coasts  northward  to  the  upper  Mississippi  Valley  and  upper  Lake  region,  over 
which  region  the  total  rainfall  accompanying  the  tropical  storm  on  the  27th  and  28th 
generally  ranged  from  2  to  more  than  8  inches,  nearly  14  inches  having  fallen  at  Pen- 
sacola.  The  central  and  east  Gulf  districts  sustained  severe  losses  as  a  result  of  high 
winds  and  excessive  rains  accompanying  this  storm. 

The  temperature  conditions  were  generally  favorable,  being  above  the  normal  over 
nearly  the  whole  country.  Freezing  temperatures  occurred,  however,  in  portions  of 
the  Rocky  Mountain  and  upper  Lake  regions  and  in  northern  New  England,  with 
light  to  heavy,  but  generally  harmless,  frosts  in  the  northern  districts  from  the  Mis- 
souri Valley  eastward  during  the  latter  part  of  the  week. 

REVIEW    OF   THE    SEASON. 

The  season  from  March  1  to  October  1,  1906  (215  days),  closed  with  a  decided  short- 
age in  precipitation  in  the  central  valleys  and  west  Gulf  States  and  over  a  large  part  of 
the  Lake  region  and  south  Atlantic  coast  districts.  A  marked  deficiency  also  existed 
on  the  north  Pacific  coast.  In  California  and  generally  throughout  the  Plateau  and 
Rocky  Mountain  regions  the  seasonal  precipitation  was  much  above  the  normal.  An 
excess  was  also  shown  over  the  interior  portions  of  the  south  Atlantic  and  east  Gulf 
districts  and  on  the  middle  Atlantic  coast. 

For  the  period  from  March  1  to  this  time  the  seasonal  temperature  was  above  the 
normal  over  the  greater  part  of  the  country  east  of  the  Mississippi  River,  the  high  mean 
temperatures  during  the  last  six  weeks  having  overcome  the  seasonal  deficiency  exist- 
ing over  a  large  part  of  this  region  in  the  earlier  part  of  the  summer.  The  aver- 
age daily  excess  was  most  marked  in  the  upper  Lake  region  and  on  the  southern 
New  England  and  middle  Atlantic  coasts,  where  it  ranged  from  1°  to  2°  per  day.  The 
seasonal  temperature  was  also  in  excess  of  the  normal  on  the  north  Pacific  coast,  on 
the  immediate  coast  of  extreme  southern  California,  and  in  the  upper  Missouri  Valley. 
It  was  below  the  normal  in  central  and  northern  California  and  throughout  the  middle 
and  southern  Plateau  and  Rocky  Mountain  regions,  the  departures  ranging  from  1°  to 
2°  over  the  middle  Rocky  Mountain  slope  and  middle  Plateau  region. 

October. 

The  mean  temperature  for  this  month  was  below  the  normal  over  most  of  the  country 
from  the  southeastern  Rocky  Mountain  slope  to  the  south  Atlantic  coast,  the  defi- 
ciency being  most  marked  in  the  Gulf  States,  where  it  generally  ranged  from  3°  to  5° 
per  day.  A  slight  deficiency  was  also  shown  over  the  Ohio  and  lower  Missouri  valleys, 
the  western  portion  of  the  upper  Lake  region,  and  northern  New  England.  Over  the 
greater  part  of  the  Lake  region,  however,  and  in  the  upper  Mississippi  and  Middle 
Atlantic  States  the  mean  temperature  differed  but  slightly  from  the  normal.  In 
eastern  North  Carolina,  southern  Florida,  and  the  upper  Missouri  Valley,  and  gen- 
erally throughout  the  Plateau  and  Pacific  coast  regions  the  mean  temperature  was 
above  the  normal,  the  average  daily  excess  ranging  from  3°  to  5°  over  the  northern 
Plateau  and  the  greater  part  of  California. 

The  lowest  minimum  temperature,  6°,  occurred  at  Devils  Lake,  N.  Dak.,  and  the 
next  lowest,  8°.  at  Flagstaff,  Ariz.  In  the  Plateau  region,  upper  Missouri  Valley,  and- 
western  portion  of  the  upper  Lake  region  the  minimum  temperatures  generally  ranged 
from  12°  to  20°;  in  the  lower  Missouri,  upper  Mississippi,  and  Ohio  valleys  and  the 
greater  part  of  the  Lake  region  and  New  England,  from  20°  to  30°;  over  the  northern 
portion  of  the  Southern  States,  from  30°  to  40°;  and  along  the  south  Atlantic  and  Gulf 
coasts,  from  40°  to  50°,  except  in  extreme  southern  Florida  and  on  the  west  Gulf  coast, 
where  they  were  above  50°.  Freezing  temperatures  extended  as  far  south  as  the  west- 
ern portion  of  southern  Texas  and  the  northern  portions  of  Alabama  and  Georgia. 

The  precipitation  during  October  exceeded  the  normal  over  the  middle  Rocky 
Mountain  slope,  central  Missouri  Valley,  and  the  greater  part  of  the  central  Gulf 
States,  and  also  in  the  knver  Lake  region,  Middle  Atlantic  States,  and  portions  of  the 
South  Atlanl  ic  States  and  New  England.  The  total  fall  was  heaviest  on  the  west  Gulf 
coast,  where  it  ranged  from  6  to  10  inches,  while  amounts  ranging  from  4  to  more  than  7 
inches  were  reported  from  portions  of  the  lower  Lake  region,  Middle  Atlantic  States, 
and  southern  New  England.  In  the  lower  Missouri,  upper  Mississippi,  and  Ohio 
valleys,  in  Florida,  and  in  portions  of  New  England  and  the  South  Atlantic  States, 
there  was  less  than  the  normal  precipitation,  the  deficiency  being  marked  in  the  lower 
Missouri  and  upper  Mississippi  valleys  and  in  Florida.  There  was  more  than  the  usual 
amount  in  portions  of  western  Washington,  but  elsewhere  on  the  Pacific  coast  there 
was  a  marked  deficiency,  as  compared  with  the  October  normal. 


WEATHER    AND    CROP    CONDITIONS    IN    1906. 


489 


HEAVY    SNOW    IX    COLORADO    AND    WYOMING. 

From  the  19th  to  the  23d  a  severe  storm  prevailed  in  the  Rocky  Mountain  region, 
the  snowfall  in  Colorado  and  Wyoming  being  exceptionally  heavy. 

November. 

"While  the  weather  was  unusually  dry  in  California,  the  north  Pacific  coast  experi- 
enced unusually  stormy  weather  during  the  greater  part  of  the  first  half  of  the  month, 
the  heavy  rains  causing  damaging  freshets  in  Oregon  and  Washington.  Another 
marked  feature  of  the  month's  weather  was  the  stormy  period  from  the  19th  to  the  21st 
in  the  Mississippi  and  Ohio  valleys,  very  heavy  rains  occurring  in  eastern  Arkansas, 
northern  Mississippi,  the  western  portions  of  Tennessee  and  Kentucky,  and  the  south- 
ern portions  of  Indiana  and  Illinois.  In  the  Atlantic  coast  and  east  Gulf  districts 
weather  conditions  were  mild,  with  much  less  than  the  usual  rainfall. 

The  mean  temperature  was  above  the  normal  over  most  of  the  country  east  of  the 
Rocky  Mountains,  the  average  daily  excess  being  less  than  3°  per  day,  except  over 
portions  of  the  upper  Lake  region  and  Middle  Atlantic  and  central  Gulf  States,  where 
it  ranged  from  3°  to  5°  per  day.  In  Tennessee  and  portions  of  the  central  Mississippi 
and  lower  Missouri  valleys  and  in  the  middle  Rocky  Mountain  region  and  northern 
California  the  mean  temperature  was  nearly  normal.  Generally  throughout  the 
Plateau  regions  and  in  southern  California  the  month  averaged  colder  than  usual,  the 
deficiency  in  temperature  ranging  from  3°  to  4°  per  day  over  an  area  covering  portions 
of  California,  Nevada,  and  Utah,  and  in  portions  of  eastern  Oregon  and  Washington. 

The  precipitation  during  this  month  was  much  below  the  average  in  the  Atlantic 
coast  and  Gulf  districts,  except  in  extreme  southern  Florida  and  on  the  southern  Texas 
coast,  where  it  was  much  above  the  average.  The  total  amount  in  the  coast  districts 
from  southern  New  England  to  central  Florida  was  generally  less  than  2  inches,  and 
over  a  large  part  of  this  regio..  there  was  less  than  1  inch,  making  the  deficiency  range 
from  1  inch  to  more  than  2  in.  hes.  There  was  also  less  than  the  usual  rainfall  in  the 
lower  Lake  region  and  upper  Ohio  Valley,  over  portions  of  the  central  Missouri  Valley, 
and  in  Oklahoma  and  California.  The  precipitation  was  excessively  heavy  in  the 
lower  Ohio  and  central  Mississippi  valleys,  where  it  ranged  from  6  to  18  inches,  the 
largest  amounts  being  reported  from  eastern  Arkansas,  northern  Mississippi,  and 
western  Tennessee.  Generally  throughout  the  Plateau  and  north  Pacific  coast  regions 
the  precipitation  exceeded  the  average,  a  large  excess  being  indicated  over  the  south- 
ern Rocky  Mountain  region  and  the  greater  part  of  Oregon  and  Washington. 

At  the  close  of  the  month  the  upper  Michigan  Peninsula  and  portions  of  northern 
Minnesota.  North  Dakota,  and  Montana  were  covered  with  snow  ranging  in  depth  from 
1  inch  to  11  inches.  Stations  in  portions  of  Nevada  and  Utah  reported  depths  at  the 
close  of  the  month  ranging  from  4  to  12  inches. 

Average  daily  departures  from  normal  temperatures  {degrees  Fahrenheit)  saisoa  of  1906. 


Section. 


New  England 

Middle  Atlantic  States 

South  Atlantic  States 

Florida  Peninsula 

Eastern  Gulf  States 

Western  Gulf  States 

Ohio  Valley  and  Tennessee. 

Lower  Lake  Region 

Upper  Lake  Region 

North  Dakota 

Upper  Mississippi  Valley.. . 

Missouri  Valley 

Northern  Slope 

Middle  Slope 

Southern  Slope 

Southern  Plateau 

Middle  Plateau 

Northern  Plateau 

North  Pacific  Coast  Region 
Middle  Pacific  Coast  Region 
South  Pacific  Coast  Region 


From 

For  week  ended- 

to 

Apr.  2. 

April — 

Ma 

J 

inclu- 

sive. 

9. 

16. 

.    '3' 

30. 

4. 

14. 

21. 

28. 

+  1.4 

-0.1 

+  1.1 

+  3.0 

-1.1 

+  1.0 

-4.0 

+3.2 

-0.7 

+0.0 

+  1.8 

+3.5 

+  5.8 

+  1.0 

+  5.8 

-5.1 

»  +5.2 

+  1.4 

-0.7 

+0.4 

+6.1 

+  1.1 

+  1.9 

+6.5 

-7.5 

+3.5 

-1.4 

-1.2 

-2.7 

+  1.7 

-0.3 

+  1.3 

+3.0 

-0.7 

+0.7 

-0.3 

-2.3 

+  1.0 

+3.2 

-1.1 

+2.9 

+  3.9 

-8.4 

+2.5 

-2.1 

-1.5 

+0.0 

+  0.4 

-2.3 

+3.4 

+  1.7 

-4.8 

+2.0 

+  0.8 

-1.2 

+2.8 

+3.9 

0.0 

+3.9 

+2.3 

-6.9 

+  5.8 

+  3.9 

+  1.2 

+  1.9 

+  4.4 

+  2.5 

+0.5 

+0.0 

-5.9 

+4.1 

+  4.4 

+  2.0 

+  3.2 

+3.7 

+5.3 

+3.4 

-0.1 

-3.4 

+6.4 

-0.9 

+3.0 

+  5.3 

+  1.0 

+  9.3 

+6.3 

-4.0 

+  2.7 

+0.7 

-8.3 

+0.1 

+  3.9 

+  1.4 

+3.0 

+5.3 

-1.0 

-1.4 

+  5.5 

+  1.3 

+  1.7 

+2.2 

+0.4 

+  5.5 

+  4.6 

-7.3 

+  3.7 

+7.0 

+0.1 

+2.4 

+  1.3 

+  2.1 

+  9.3 

+  1.7 

-3.0 

+6.1 

+3.1 

-0.0 

+0.9 

-1.7 

+  0.7 

+  4.2 

+2.7 

-2.2 

+  1.5 

+6.3 

-0.5 

-0.7 

-2.5 

+  0.5 

-3.5 

+  4.0 

-1.5 

-1.0 

+  1.7 

-0.7 

+  1.2 

-3.5 

+0.8 

+3.7 

-4.7 

-2.5 

+0.3 

+0.7 

-5.3 

+  1.4 

-1.2 

+  1.4 

+  7.2 

-3.8 

+  1.4 

+  3.5 

-0.3 

-4.5 

+  1.4 

+2.0 

+2.0 

+  7.8 

+0.2 

+2.2 

+  6.6 

-3.3 

-5.2 

+  1.9 

+  3.7 

+  1.0 

+  5.3 

+  1.9 

+2.6 

+  1.9 

-3.4 

-2.3 

+  1.7 

+  3.0 

+  2.0 

+3.0 

-3.0 

+0.3 

+0.3 

-5.3 

-6.7 

+  2.0 

-0.5 

+  1.0 

+  5.0 

-5.0 

+  1.0 

-1.2 

—  2.2 

-4.8 

490 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


partures from  normal  temperatures  idegret?  Fa''   ■  sea/ton  of  1906 — • 

I 


For  week  ended- 


- 


JUD<^ 


Julv- 


:■•. 


23. 


-2.2 

—1.2 

Soot/-                         les —0.6 

Florida  Peninsula +0.3 

-0.5 

--   ! 

Ohio  Valley  and  Tennessee ...  _  _ 

Region —3.5 

Region. —1.1 

-      " 

Upper  Mississippi  Valley —1.2 

' —1.6 

—4.1 

-0. 5 

T>e 0. 0 

Southern  Flatten -0.3 

Middle  Plateau -6.2 

-.teau 

.  Pacific  Coast  Region..  —0.3 

Middle  Pacific-Coast  Region. .  —  4.7 

South  Pacific-  C  oast  Region . .  -4.0 


- 

-.  " 
-0.3 
+3.5 
+3.9 
+5.4 

+5.1 
-0.3 
4-2.1 

-:  - 
-2.1 
+3.0 
-3.7 
-0.3 
-3.7 
-3.2 
-2.0 

0.0 


-3.7 
-3.9 
-3.4 
-0.7 
-1.5 
-1.1 
-o.l 
-5.2 
-4.0 
-1.0 
—  5.0 
-1.9  ; 
+0.9 
-1  2 
-0.7 
+3.0 
-0.3 
-2.0 
-2.3 
-3.7 
- 


-3.1 
-1.4 
+1.0 
-0.3 

+  1.9. 

+0.4 : 

-3.3  I 

-3.1 

-3.5 

-9-0 

-6.9 

-7.9 

-9-4 

—6.5 

-0.3 

-0.S  i 

-4.5 

-4.3 

+  1.0 

-    - 


-r0.9 

+3.8 
+3.2 
0.0  I 

- 

+2.8  I 

_  '    | 
-3.5 
-1.7 
-0.1  , 
-3.0 

- 

1 
-32 
-1.0 
-3.3 


-3.4. 
-1.9 
-2.0 
-0.3  ■. 
-0. 5  , 
-2.8  | 
-2.8 
-3.1 
-3.3 
+  1.0 
-5.7 
-4.9 
-2.4 
-7   - 
-8.0 
•   - 
-1.3 

+5.9 
+5.3 

-.   - 


-1.1 

-2.5 
-0.7 
-1.9 
-0.6 
-1.2 
+  1.0 

-1.5 
-1.0 
-3.5 

-2.7 
-5.3 
-2.7 
-0.7 
+  1.8 

+6.1 

i 
+3.5 


+3.3 
-2.4 
+0.5 
-0.3 
-1.1 
-1.4 
-0.4 
+  2.8 
4-2 

0.0 
-02 
-1.8 

0.0 
-1.3 
-0.2 
+  1.2 

! 

-0.3 

+0.5 


-1.4 
-1.9 
-2.5 
-0.7 
-1.1 
-1.2 
-3.2 
-l.C 
-(  : 
0.0 
—2.2 
-L7 
4-1 

+  1.3 
+  1.0 

+  1.1 

-1.7 


For  week  ended- 


August— 


.-!■•:--  :':     T- 


Octo- 
ber. 


Xew  England — 1.0 

Middle  Atlar.-  4-3.4 

South  Atlantic  Stat  es —0.3  -   .7 

Florida  Peninsula  — 1.> 

Eastern  Guif  States -•'-•  -2.0 

-     Guli  States 

-  :   -  —2. 1 

Lower  Lake  Region —4.2  +1.8 

Upper  Lake  Region +2.9  —1.2 

akoxa -3.0  — :  ... 

4-2.7  +0.7 

+0.8  -1.7 

-     :••- —2.9 

Middle  Slope. -0.7  -2.2 

pe -2.0  -2.3 

Southern  Plateau —1.7  — L2 

Middle  Plateau -1.' 

-:.- 

Xorth  I  'ac-ine  Coa*t  Region. .  —0.7 

Middle  Pacific  Coat: 

South  Pacific  Coast  Region. .  -  0. 2  -1.2 


-  1.7 

-  L9 

-  2.3 
0.0 

-  l.i. 

-  0.1 

-  .  a 
■  - 

4-10.3 

- 

-  1.3 

-  1.3 

-  1.5 

-  1.0 

-  1.9 

+  2.2 


- 
+3.8 
-1.5 
-0.7 

-3.2 

+5.8 
-' 

+  5.9 
-6.0 

+0.4 

—  5.7 
+0-8  ; 
-0.3 
-3.8 

—  o.  o 
'    ! 

-3.2 


- 

+  1-7 

-     '. 

0.0 

0.0 
+0.8 
-0.2 
-0.8 

-0.5 
+0.3 

0.0 

-3.0 
-0.3 
+3.8 
+  1.4 
-1.0 
i 


-  0.3 

-  1.4 

-  1.5 
+  1.3 
+  2.0 

-  11 

-  . 

+  6.6 

-  " 

-  9-0 

-  3.0 

-  1.0 
0.0 

- 

+  0.7 

+  0.3 

-  0..3 


-1.8 
-4.5 
—3.5 
J-1.0 

-ro.0 
+4.1 
■  - 
+6.5 
+0.3 
+6.8 

-5.1 

+  1.3 

-3.7 
-7.0 

-1.6 
-1.3 


- 

-  "    • 

+  1.3  ' 

+  3.0 

- 

- 

+  8.0  ! 
+  6.4 

! 

-  4.1 

-  3.3  j 
0.0 

-0.7 

-  1.7 

- 

+  1.3 


-2.0 

-- 

-0.3 
+2.8 
+  1-1 
+4.0 

- 

hi 

+  1.8 
+1.6 

-4.1 
+0.5 
+  1.0 
-- 

+2.8 
+3.8 

-      " 


WEATHER    AND    CROP    CONDITIONS    IN    1906. 


491 


Departures  from  normal  precipitation  (inches  and  hundredths)  season  of  1906. 


Section. 


New  England 

Middle  Atlantic  States 

South  Atlantic  States 

Florida  Peninsula 

Eastern  Gull  states 

Western  Guli  St  ites 

Ohio  Valley  and  Tennessee. 

Lower  Lake  B egion 

Upper  Lake  Region 

North  Dakota 

Upper  Mississippi  Valley. . . 

Missouri  Valley 

Northern  Slope 

Middle  Slope 

Southern  Slope 

Southern  Plateau 

Middle  Plateau 

Northern  Plateau 

North  Pacific  Coast  Region 
Middle  Pacific  Coast  Region 
South  Pacific  Coast  Region 


From 
Jan.  1 

to 
Apr.  2. 
inclu- 
sive. 

-0.61 

- 1.  aa 

-1.21 
+2.36 
-1.07 

-:;.  72 
-3.40 
-2.82 

+  0.  IS 

-0..-.0 

+0.66 

+0.41 
+0.  39 
-0. 39 
-1.22 
+0.72 
+  1.45 
-0.  25 
-5.20 

+  5.S7 


For  week  ended— 


April- 


May— 


-o.  59 

-8.58 

-o.so 

-0.48 
-1.05 
-0. 57 
-0.  22 
+  0.12 
+0.12 
-0.11 
+  0.32 
+0.13 
-0.02 
+0. 59 
+0. 85 
+0.  30 
+  0.29 
-0.27 
-0.  66 
-0.03 
-0. 16 


+  1.22 
+  1.16 
+  0.09 
+0.70 
-0.20 
-0.18 
-0. 16 
+0.32 
+0.01 
+0.30 
-0.27 
+0.14 
-0.14 
+0.21 
-0.28 
-0.04 
+0.03 
-0.20 
-0.82 
-0.  54 
-0.28 


-Ox; 
-0.58 
-0.(9 
-0.  27 
-0.97 
-0.31 
-0.77 
-0.37 
-0.S8 
-0.50 
-0.71 
-0.65 
-0.  26 
-0.28 
+0.58 
+0.06 
-0.09 
-0.28 
-0.73 
-0.46 
-0.28 


30. 

-0.37 
-0.58 
-0.51 
-0.41 
-O.tS 
-0.70 
-0.52 
-0.45 
-0.35 
-0. 32 
-0. 53 
-0.11 
+0.26 
+0.33 
-0.48 
0.00 
-0.23 
-0.08 
-0.18 
+0.66 
+0.31 


7. 

14. 

+0.17 

-0.  49 

+0.13 

-0.  63 

+  0.06 

-0.52 

-o.eo 

-0.25 

+  1.08 

-0.66 

+0.89 

-0.89  • 

+0.17 

-0.86 

-0.21 

+  0.14 

-0.05 

-0.13 

-0. 05 

0.00 

-0.20 

-0.28 

-0.02 

-0.76 

-0.02 

-0.26 

-0.40 

-0.S1 

-0.34 

-0.32 

-0. 05 

-o.o; 

-0. 02 

+  0.34 

-0.33 

-0.26 

-0.  73 

-0.13 

-0.50 

-0.28 

-0. 06 

+0. 17 

-0. 06 
-0.72 
-0.77 
-0.22 
-0.61 
-0.23 
-0.78 
-0.74 
-0.  52 
+0.56 
-0.49 
-0.64 
-0. 16 
-0.18 
-0.51 
+0.06 
-0. 16 
+0.O.) 
+0.  48 
+  0.32 
-0.07 


+  0.95 
+0.20 
+  1.48 
+3.20 
+  0.37 
-0.45 
+0.22 
-0.  45 
+0.02 
+  1.28 
+  0.76 
+  0.25 
-t-1.14 
+0. 16 
0.00 
-0.06 
+0.  51 
+  0.50 
+0.  26 
+  1.79 
+-1.(0 


Section. 


For  week  ended  - 


June- 


July- 


New  England 

Middle  Atlantic  Slate:; 

South  Atlantic  States 

Florida  Peninsula 

Eastern  i  lull  States 

Western  Gull  States 

Ohio  Valley  and  Tennessee. 

Lower  Lake  Region 

Upper  Lake  Region 

North  Dakota 

Upper  Mississippi  Valley... 

Missouri  Valley 

Northern  Slope 

Middle  Slope 

Southern  Slope 

Southern  Plateau 

Middle  Plateau 

Northern  Plateau 

North  Pacific  Coast  Region 
Middle  Pacific  Coast  Region 
South  Pacific  Coast  Region 


4. 

11- 

+  0.16 

+  0.81 

9.09 

+0. 13 

-0.41 

+  0.14 

-0.  76 

+1.18 

-0.61 

-0.69 

+0.19 

-0.81 

-0.08 

+  0.14 

-0.80 

+  0..-4 

-0.  52 

+0.41 

+0.40 

+  1.42 

-0.43 

-0.07 

+0.04 

-0.66 

+  0.  12 

+0.  23 

-0.32 

-0.56 

+  1.41 

-0.53 

0.00 

-0.07 

+0.18 

-0.01 

+1.67 

-0.02 

-0.  03 

+  0.38 

+  0.08 

+  0.03 

+0.10 

-0.02 

18. 


+  0.53 
+0. 52 
+  3.56 
+  2.07 
+  0.63 
-0.  76 
-0.18 
+0.10 
-0.  59 
-0.39 
-0.89 
-0.14 
-0.25 
+0.10 
-0.  70 
-0.06 
-0.04 
-0.08 
+0.61 
+  0.  22 
-0.01 


25. 


+0.22 
+  0.  42 
-0.59 

+  0.  16 

-1.08 

-0.12 
-0.08 
-0.29 
-0.14 
-0.46 
-0.09 
+0.34 
-0. 02 
-0.  12 
-0.31 
-0.08 
-0.09 
-0.24 
-0.39 
-0.09 
0.00 


+0.09 
-0.31 
-0.50 
-1.41 
+0.02 
+0.14 
-0.47 
-0.19 
+  0.36 
+  0.86 
+  0.17 
+0.20 
-0.  22 
-0.05 
-0.56 
-0.12 
+  0.12 
+  0.  15 
+  0.20 
+  0.07 
0.00 


+0. 22 
+  0.14 
+0.  51 
+0.  96 
-0.02 
+  0.04 
+  0.02 
+ 1 .  03 
-0.63 
-0.74 
-8.65 
-0.80 
-0.36 
-0.34 
+  0.08 
+  0.47 
+  0.  24 
-0.04 
-0.  25 
-0.03 
0.00 


16. 


23. 


30. 


-0.22  ■ 

+0.12 

+0.33 

-0.13 

+0.85 

+0.32 

-0.03  i 

-0.42 

-0.09 

-0.20 

-0.  40 

+0.03 

+  0.10 

+  1.00 

+o.4i  ; 

-0.04  I 
-0.02 
-0.12 
-0.08  | 
0.00  i 
0.00  I 


-0.22 
+  0.02 
+  0.49 
-0.07 
+  1.08 
+  0.34 
+  1.32 
+0.31 
-0. 19 
-0.  40 
-0.28 
+0.19 
-0.  27 
-0.10 
+  0.11 
-0.19 
-0. 06 
-0.03 
-0.16 
0.00 
0.00 


+  0.27 
+  0.39 
+  0.  42 
+  2.36 
+0.01 
+  0.37 
-0.02 
+  0.24 
+0.37 
-0. 16 
-0.01 
-0.  43 
-0.0S 
+0.S6 
-0.22 
-0.21 
+0.16 
-0.07 
-0.16 
0.00 
0.00 


Section. 


For  week-  ended— 


August  - 


September- 


G. 


New  E  ugla nd +0.11 

Middle  Atlantic  States +0.  35 

South  Atlantic  States +0.38 

Florida  Peninsula +0.  91 

Eastern  Gulf  States —0.  71 

Western  Gulf  States -0.  40 

Ohio  Valley  and  Tennessee.. .  — o.  59 

Lower  Lake  Region —0.36 

Upper  Lake  Region —0. 14 

North  Dakota +0.  .53 

Upper  Mississippi  Valley +0. 03 

Missouri  Valley +1.  27 

Northern  Slope +  0.  55 

Middle  Slope +0.01 

Southern  Slope +0.  22 

Southern  Plateau +0.  48 

Middle  Plateau +0.  05 

Northern  Plateau +0.02 

North  Pacific  Coast  Region. .  —0. 14 

Middle  Pacific  Coast  Region . .  0.  00 

South  Pacific  Coast  Region. . .  -0. 02 


13. 

20. 

-0.35 

-0.87 

+  1.07 

-0.  12 

-0.73 

-0.  24 

+  0.  40 

-0.76 

-a  26 

+0.  25 

+0.67 

-0.  15 

+0.40 

+  0.34 

+1.08 

-0.38 

+  0.17 

-0.43 

-0.09 

-0.05 

+0.97 

+0.48 

+0.67 

-0.57 

+0.23 

+0.02 

+0.20 

-0.28 

+  1.85 

-0.46 

-0.15 

+  0.24 

-0.09 

+  0.  18 

+  0.24 

+0.  11 

-0.04 

-0.09 

0.00 

-0.01 

-0.02 

0.00 

-0.22 
+0.43 
+0.01 
+0.7S 
0.00 
-0.06 
-0. 09 
+0.  20 
+0.74 
+  0.  45 
+  0.02 
+  0.54 
+  0.  64 
+  0.61 
+0.  65 
+0.20 
+0.43 
+  0.  11 
-0.  25 
-0. 02 
+0.02 


3. 

10. 

17. 

+0.08 

-0.  54 

-0.43 

+0.46 

-0.82 

-0.34 

+0.  £0 

-0.47 

-0.  76 

-0.80 

-0.  92 

-1.37 

-0.31 

+0.78 

-0.36 

-0.  65 

+0.30 

-0.  51 

-0.25 

-0.13 

-0.  26 

-0.  13 

-0.69 

-0.  66 

-0.  28 

-0.79 

+0.07 

-0.  32 

-0.30 

+0.42 

+0.  03 

-0.51 

+  0.01 

-0.10 

-0.49 

+  1.42 

-0.08 

-0.22 

+  1.09 

+0.92 

-0.22 

+  1.86 

+o.  19 

+  0.10 

-0.22  | 

-0.19 

-0.19 

+0. 12 

+0.14 

-0.16 

+  0.1.6 

-0.  13 

-0. 05 

+  0.23 

-0.39 

+  1.C0 

+0.  62 

-0. 05 

-0. 03 

-0.03 

0.00 

0.00 

+0.02 

492 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


THE  LIVE-STOCK  INDUSTRY  IN  1906. 
By  A.  D.  Melvix.  Chief  of  Ou  I  _~ 

Iu  spite  of  ilie  violent  agitation  which  prevailed  during  a  considerable 
year  against  conditions  at  some  of  the  large  pa         a         •--.  and  which  seriously  affi 

the  trade  in  certain  classes  of  meat  products,  it  can  truly  be  said  thai  1 
respects  a  highly  successful  year  for  the  live-stock:  industry.     The  public  prejudice 
against  the  lower  grades  of  meat  products  reacted  in  favor  of  the  better  grades,  and  the 
prices  obtained  for  the  latter  reached  a  very  remunerative  point  for  the  producer. 

DECREASE    IX    PMC] 

As  regards  the  cattle  trade,  prices  have  risen  all  along  the  line.     The  average  price 
of  native  cattle  at  the  Chicago  stock  yards  for  the  year  was  $S  .  -     _         t  J     "5  in 

1905.     This  is  an  increase  of  55  very  100  pounds  of  live  weight,  or  11  per 

Texas  cattle  rose  from  (4-20  to  $4-45,  and  western  cattle  made  the  highest  gain  of  any. 
their  average  going  from  |     -         £4.40.     Another  ii  ftheprospei 

of  the  cattle  trade  may  be  cited  in  connection  with  the  public  sales  of  pure-bre-.- 
cattle  in  the  United  States  during  1906.  which  totaled        ■  !  — an 

advance  of  fully  10  per  cent  on  1905:  and  there  was  also  a  considerable  increase  i 
average  price  per  head. 

Hog  growers  had  a  phenomenally  successful  year.     The  hogs  sold  at  Chics  _ 
the  year,  according  to  a  good  market  authority,  realized  $15,000,0 
than  was  received  in  19<i.5.  and  the  average  price  on  the  market  was  an  even  $1  per 
hundredweight  more  than  in  190.5 — an  increase  of  19  per  cent.     Sheep  raisers  had  a  good 
year  also,  although  their  increases  were  not  as  great  as  the  preceding. 

IXCEEASE    IX    EXPC I      - 

While  the  home  market  thus  maintained  a  highly  satisfactory  condition,  the  ex] 
trade  in  animal  products  reached  the  highest  amount  yet  attained,  the  total  value  of 
these  exports  for  1906  being  $2      527  588,  an  advance  of  $23,144,694  over  1905.     I 

ously  the  highest  total  value  of  animal  products  exported  in  one  year  had 
$2£     ^20.152.  in  1901.     There  was  a  heavy  falling  off  in  exports  of  canned  meats  in  1906, 
due.  of  course,  to  the  agitation  before  mentioned,  but  it  is  gratify::  _ 
was  more  than  offset  by  gains  in  other  classes  of  meats.     The  public.  :  a :.  and 

domestic,  has  evidently  discriminated  very  carefully  between  canned  meats,  which 
were  most  affected  by  the  insanitary  conditions  at  packing  houses,  and  fresh  : 
the  wholesomeness  of  which  was  never  seriously  questioned  in  all  the  di-    issi    .     : 
packing-house  conditi 

NUMBERS    AND    VALUES    OF    FATIM    AXIMALS.  JAXCARY    1.   1907. 

The  prosperous  condition  and  the  vastness  of  the  live-stock  industry  are  well  shown 
by  the  annual  estimate  of  the  number  and  value  of  farm  animal.- 
January  1.  1907.  by  the  Bureau  of  Statistics  of  this  Department.  ..- 

mber  and  value  of/arm  animals  in  the  Xh  Si     ■  -.  January  i,  19t 


Farm  animals. 

Xumbe  r. 

com- 
pared 
with 
Januarv 

•    - 
hes.4. 

.  ae. 

---  a 

-.-  i 

53. 240. 000 

100.9 

-    ' 

102.4 

- 

S33.51 

-    ' 
• 

--■ 

' 

Other  cat  tit- -. 

•• 

204. 210. 000 

117  ; 

The  total  value  reaches  the  stupendous  sum  of  %A    .       -".000.     The  above  £ 
ment  shows  an  increase  during  1906  in  the  number  of  all  ..nimals  ex 

'"other  cattle"  and  swine,  and  the  decrease  in  swine  wa«  insignificant.     A  striking 
enhancement  in  the  value  of  farm  animals  during  the  year  is  shown  by  compari:.- 


THE    LIVE-STOCK    INDUSTRY    IX    1906. 


493 


average  prices  per  head  as  estimated  on  January  1,  1906,  and  on  January  1,  1907.  The 
increase  per  head  in  each  class  is  as  follows :  Horses.  812.79;  mules.  813.85;  milch  cows, 
$1.56;  other  cattle,  $1.25;  sheep,  $0.30;  swine,  $1.44. 

-   LIVE-STOCK    EXHIBITIONS. 

-  Live-stock  shows  are  an  important  educational  factor  for  improvement  in  breeding 
and  feeding.  The  two  principal  exhibitions  of  the  year  were  the  ••American  Royal," 
at  Kansas  City,  in  October,  and  the  '•International.''  at  Chicago,  December  1  to  8.  At 
each  of  these  shows  there  was  brought  together  a  splendid  collection  of  fine  breeding 
and  fat  stock.  In  number  and  high  quality  of  exhibits  and  in  magnitude  of  attend- 
ance the  International  Exposition  of  1906  surpassed  all  previous  exhibitions.  There 
were  on  exhibition  in  this  show  6,043  animals,  as  follows: 

Exhibits  at  tin  International  Exposition  at  Chicaijo.  December.  1006. 


Class. 

I 
Individual 
exhibits. 

Carload  exhibit?. 

X umber  of 
carloads. 

Number  oi 

animals. 

Fat  cattle 

'            1.067 

97 
29 

1.45.5 

780 

Ij09 

897 

17 
2 

877 

Hoes 

■• 

100 

Total 

2.  K'A 

155 

3.212 

Most  of  the  animals  were  in  the  younger  classes,  and  the  grand  champion  of  the  show 
was  a  Hereford  calf  11  months  old. 

CHANGE    IN"    LAW    REGARDING    TRANSPORTATION    OF    LIVE    STOCK. 

The  statute  commonly  known  as  the  twenty-eight  hour  law  was  changed  by  act  of 
Congress  approved  June  29,  1906.  The  old  law,  passed  in  1873,  prohibited  the  con- 
finement in  cars,  boats,  or  other  vessels,  for  a  longer  period  than  twenty-eight  consecu- 
tive hours,  of  cattle,  sheep,  swine,  or  other  animals  in  transit  from  one  State  to  another, 
without  unloading  the  same  for  rest,  water,  and  feeding  for  at  least  live  hours,  unless 
the  animals  were  carried  in  cars,  boats,  or  vessels  in  which  they  could  and  did  have 
proper  feed,  water,  space,  and  opportunity  to  rest.  For  some  years  there  had  been 
many  violations  of  this  law  by  railroads,  despite  the  Department's  efforts  to  enforce 
it.  While  the  object  of  the  law  was  good,  in  many  cases  it  was  a  greater  hardship  to 
the  animals  and  to  the  shippers  to  have  the  law  complied  with  than  to  carry  the  ani- 
mals on  to  destination  without  unloading.  At  length  the  dissatisfaction  on  the  part 
of  shippers  led  to  the  enactment  of  the  new  law,  which  permits  an  extension  of 
the  time  to  thirty-six  hours  on  the  written  request  of  the  owner  or  person  in  custody 
of  the  shipment.  This  request  must  be  separate  and  apart  from  any  printed  bill  of 
lading  or  other  railroad  form.  Sheep,  on  account  of  their  well-known  objection  to 
moving  at  night,  are  not  required  to  be  unloaded  during  the  night,  but  the  time  of 
their  confinement  may  not  be  extended  beyond  thirty-six  hours.  In  most  other 
respects  the  new  law  is  similar  to  the  old,  though  occasion  was  taken  to  correct  some 
defects  of  the  old  law.     The  penalty  for  each  -violation  is  from  S100  to  $500. 


THE    MEAT    INSPECTION. 

An  important  event  of  the  year  was  the  extension  of  the  meat-inspection  service 
of  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry,  consequent  upon  the  passage  of  the  law  of  June  30, 
1906. 

As  the  conditions  at  the  Chicago  stock  yards  and  packing  houses  have  been  so 
prominently  before  the  public,  it  may  be  well  to  point  out  certain  facts  regarding 
the  meat-inspection  service-  as  conducted  by  the  Bureau. 

Until  the  passage  of  the  new  meat-inspection  law  on  the  last  day  of  the  fiscal  year 
(June  30,  1906).  the  inspection  was  carried  on  under  the  act  of  March  3,  1891,  as 
amended  by  the  act  of  March  2,  1895.     That  law  provided  for — 

1.  The  inspection  of  all  live  cattle  which  were  intended  for  export  or  whose  car- 
casses or  products  were  intended  for  export. 


4^4         YEA.  ;he  department  of  agriculture. 

2.  B,   and  hogs  which 

■d  -which  were  aVmt  I  gktered  at 

g    salting.  |  -  rend« rir !  duasente  in  any  • 

".  1  for 
-uinption  in  a:  r  £  t  Termor  nbia. 

rtern  examination  of  cai  all  cattle. 

be  prepared  for  human  consumption  at  any  slaughter;, 
cam,     _     ■  .  -  s  iment  in  any  State  or  Territory  M 

and  whi  b  ssasesce. 

In  other  von  while  the  . 

mortem  cxamir. 

id  limitation.-  oi  thai  law  ■ 
mder  which  the-  iimfw  <  liii  va?  conducted.     In  the  first  place, 

gnl  ered 
-  the  carcasses  or  products  of  whi'  b 

made  for  funds  with  -whi 
perfo  spriatieB  b  sufficient  to  enable 

Lisbmente  carrying 
man]  -  which  applied  for  I  on  account  of 

Wh  of  meati  and  products  which  on  inspection 

united  the  into  i  -  nest 

sad  products  found  diseased  ,  provision  and 

.  and  rendering  unfit  for  food  purposes  the  diseased  and 

-  A?a  matter  of  fact,  however,  it  has  long  been 

the  t  •  :he  Bureau  to  require  the  destruction  of  all  condemned  carcasses  and 

-.d  oi  the  precjrk  ;    f     ith  such  <■: 

bo  withdraw  inspection, 
ibtfulvhef  .  ay  authority  for  folio? 

-1  and  pawed  immediately  after  slaughter  or  fat 
such  meat  which  might  afterwards  become  unwholesome  or  andean 

Log  pi  d  the  mar- 

«   re  any  such  authority  or  not  is  a  purely  academic  ques- 

tack  of  fun  end  the  inspection  to  cover  all 

Mo  authority  whs 
anritatiori  ef  the  establishment  ilteration  or  A  chemicals 

f  the-  law. 
Th-  .-i fined  to  the  ante-:. 

animals  and  th  n  of  the  ediateiy  after  slaughter.     The  meat 

found  leof  this  post- mortem  in- 

y  marked,  and  that  J  runwho].-  leBtroyed. 

was  emci-  -  it  went  and  that  it  vent 

1.     In  all 
- 

related  aln  the  canned  and 

prep.  a  and  me 

-  whi^h  the  E  ntrol 

Tne  nev  lav  of  JFnne  3D,  19t  _      tkepoven  Agri- 

cnlti.  pernssnent  annual  appropriation  of  $3,099,000  to  Bay  the  o 

meat  the  additional  authority  and  a*  rrice 

has  \y  extender!  and  -  ned. 

st  important  changes  in  the  meat  BUIBM  fiun  bf  -peration 

e  summarized  . 

:.  is  carried  on  i 
i  31. 
-     Preri      -  ;»n  only  l»efore  and  at  the  lime  of  slaugh- 

ter.    The  inspection  is  now  es  all  departments  of  the  abattoirs  and  packing 

covers  all  the  vari<     3 stages  •     -    E  preparation,  curing,  canning, 

.  no  obbsj  -anitatioi  ice-baa  been  extended  to 

BBSSSss  have  >.>een  made  at  practically  all  i  - 
Itthments.    ranging   from    flight    modifications  to  almost    <  rrniBBh  li 

Weekly  reports  on  sanitation  are  received. 

taw  required  inspection  only  at   booses  doing  export   beef  business. 
The  ne-sr  law  requi:  ion  for  all  bstersaate  a--  well  as  export  business 

in  the  case  of  farmers  and  retail  butchers  and  ;  plying  their  customers. 


THE    LIVB-STOCK    INDUSTRY    IN    19W.  495 

(6)  Previously  there  had  been  no  control  over  transportation  of  moats  ami  moat 
food  product?.  Under  the  now  law  there  is  complete  control  over  interstate  trans- 
portation.   Every  shipment  must  be  covered  by  a  certificate  showing  either  that  the 

meat  has  boon  inspected  and  passed  or  tlmt  it  is  exempt  from  inspection. 

Instead  of  no  authority  over  trade  labels,  the  Department  is  now  empowered  to 
prevent  fraudulent  and  misleading  labeling  of  meat  products. 

I  7  i  From  no  control  over  processes  of  preparation  of  moat  food  products  and  the  use 
of  chemicals,  preservatives,  etc.,  the  Department  has  complete  control  over  such  mat- 
te:-. Careful  chemical  examinations  are  made  to  enforce  this  feature  of  the  new  law. 
-  Formerly  it  was  possible  to  withdraw  animals  that  had  been  rejected  at  ante- 
mortem  inspection  and  have  them  slaughtered  elsewhere  for  local  use.  This  is  no 
longer  permitted.  All  animals  must  be  slaughtered  and  properly  disposed  of  at  the 
establishment  for  which  bought  and  where  the  inspection  takes  place. 

It  should  be  remembered,  however,  that  the  Federal  jurisdiction  is  limited  to  inter- 
state and  foreign  commerce,  and  that  this  inspection  can  legally  be  applied  only  to 
establishments  doing  an  interstate  or  foreign  business.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  Depart- 
ment insists  upon  inspecting  the  entire  output  of  each  establishment  at  which  its 
inspectii  <n  is  maintained,  even  though  the  greater  part  of  the  product  is  to  be  consumed 
within  the  State;  but  the  Federal  inspection  does  not  and  can  not  reai  h  the  establish- 
ments doing  business  exclusively  within  a  State.  Some  of  the  worst  conditions  have 
boon  found  at  places  of  the  latter  kind.  Such  places  must  be  looked  after  by  the  State 
and  municipal  authorities.  In  the  absence  of  an  efficient  local  inspection  the  con- 
sumer should  see  that  meat  bears  the  Government  label. 

ERADICATION    OF    THE    CATTLE    TICK. 

The  year  100G  also  witnessed  the  inauguration  of  systematic  work  by  cooperation 
between  the  United  States  Department  of  Agriculture  and  State  authorities  for  the 
eradication  of  the  tick  which  transmits  the  infection  of  Texas  fever  of  cattle.  Pot 
many  years  this  tick  and  the  infection  which  it  spreads  have  been  a  great  handicap  to 
the  live-stock  industry  of  the  South.  It  is  estimated  that  the  tick  is  responsible  for 
about  8-tO.OOO.OOO  of  loss  annually  to  the  people  in  the  infected  country,  and  that  it 
also  lowers  the  assets  of  the  South  by  an  additional  S23.250.000. 

On  June  30.  1906.  Congress  appropriated  *82,500  for  the  Department  to  undertake 
the  work  of  tick  eradication  in  cooperation  with  State  authorities.  Although  fhe  time 
was  short  for  effective  work  during  that  season,  the  results  accomplished  wore  very 
gratifying  and  encouraging.  They  indicate  that  the  eradication  of  the  tick  is  entirely 
possible,  though  it  is  recognized  as  a  large  and  difficult  undertaking-  one  that  will 
require  several  years  and  considerable  money  for  its  accomplishment.  It  is  believed 
that,  as  a  result  of  the  work  during  1906,  forty  whole  counties  and  parts  of  eleven  other 
counties,  with  an  area  larger  than  the  State  of  Virginia,  can  be  safely  released  from 
quarantine.  In  some  States  adequate  laws  are  lacking,  and  in  some  no  funds  are  avail- 
able fur  such  work.  These  conditions  must  be  remedied  if  the  work  is  to  be  continued 
successfully.  The  eradication  of  the  cattle  tick  will  be  of  incalculable  advantage  to 
tin-  South  and  of  great  benefit  to  the  entire  country,  and  it  is  believed  that  money 
wisely  spent  in  this  work  will  be  a  splendid  investment  for  the  States  and  the  Nation". 
An  important  conference  of  Federal  and  State  representatives  engaged  in  the  work  of 
tick  eradication  was  held  at  Nashville.  Tenn..  December  5  and  6,  1906. 

CONTROL    OF   CONTAGIOUS    DISEASES. 

The  work  of  eradicating  sheep  scab  and  cattle  mange  in  the  West  was  continued 
vigorously  during  the  year  by  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry,  with  the  cooperation 
of  State  and  Territorial  authorities.  Those  diseases  are  being  gradually  brought  under 
control.     Already  Wyoming.  Idaho.  Utah,  and  Arizona  have  been  practically  freed 

from  sheep  scab,  and  the  disease  lias  been  greatly  diminished  in  other  States."  Such 
satisfactory  progress  has  not  boon  made,  however,  against  cattle  mange  on  account  of 
the  lack  of  the  same  hearty  cooperation  from  cattle  owners  that  is  received  from  sheep 
owners.  This  Work  consist-  principally  of  inspection  and  dipping  on  the  range  and 
at  shipping  points,  the  object  being  to  strike  the  evil  at  its  source  and  thus  prevent  the 
contamination  of  the  channels  of  interstate  commerce  and  the  spread  of  the  infection. 
This  work  means  an  immense  saving  to  the  stockmen  of  the  country.  The  eradica- 
tion of  sheep  scab  results  in  the  production  of  a  much  larger  amount  of  wool  than  is 
possible  when  the  disease  is  present,  (bio  flockmaster  with  40,000  head  of  sheep  has 
stated  that  the  dipping  increased  the  yield  of  wool  of  his  sheep  H  pounds  a  head. 
which,  at  the  value  of  20  cents  a  pound,  amounted  to  $12,000.  In  many  flocks  the 
proportion  of  increase  has  been  much  greater. 


496  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

The  free  distribution  of  blackleg  vaccine  to  stock  owners  by  the  Bureau  of  Animal 
Industry,-  has  been  continued,  with  the  usual  good  results.     During  the  year  1.279,280 
-  were  prepared  and  sent  out.     The  losses  among  vaccinated  calves  are  extremely 
small,  and  the  prevalence  of  the  disease  is  being  gradually  reduce  1. 

-     lEXTIFIC    INVESTIGATION"    OF    DISEASES. 

The  scientific  investigation  of  animal  diseases  by  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry 
yield  pecial  importance  regarding  tuberculosis  and  hog  cholera  during 

1906. 

The  urgent  need  to  strengthen  the  fight  against  tuberculosis,  especially  among  cattle, 
is  becoming  more  apparent  even."  day.  and  it  is  believed  that  the  eyes  of  the  breeders 
and  feeders  of  animals  are  opening  to  this  fact.  It  has  been  shown  by  the  work  of 
the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  that  the  most  important  factor  in  the  dissemination  of 
tubercle  bacilli  by  cattle  is  their  feces.  Heretofore  it  has  been  supposed  that  milk 
was  not  likely  to  contain  the  germs  of  tuberculosis  unless  the  cow's  udder  was  affected. 
Experiments  made  at  the  Bureau  Experiment  Station  have  demonstrated,  however, 
that  the  excrement  of  tuberculous  cattle  is  usually  heavily  charged  with  tubercle 
bacilli,  and  that  with  the  usual  methods  of  milking  the  milk  easily  becomes  contami- 
nated by  particles  of  bacilli-laden  manure.  In  this  way  a  single  tuberculous  cow  may 
be  the  means  of  infecting  the  milk  of  an  entire  herd. 

It  has  also  been  demonstrated  that  probably  the  most  fruitful  causes  of  tubercu 
in  hogs  are  the  common  practices  of  allowing  "these  animals  to  follow  cattle  in  the 
lot  and  feeding  them  on  skimmed  milk  or  separator  refuse.  The  alarming  incres 
tube:  s       .  3  is  almost  entirely  traceable  to  their  association  with  affi 

cattle.     The  sterilization  of  all  skimmed  or  separated  milk  from  public  creameries 
r  pigs  is  recommended. 
The  relative  importance  of  dried  and  pulverized  tuberculous  material  as  compared 
with  that  which  is  moist  and  fresh  has  re  .  e  attention,  and  it  ha  i  ;ited 

out  that  the  danger  from  the  latter  has  been  undervalued,  mainly  beeau-e  dried  and 
pulverized  material  is  in  better  harmony  with  the  commonly  accepted  respirj 
theory  of  infection  with  tuberculosis.  The  respiratory  theory  has  been  shown  to  be 
unnecessary  to  account  for  the  frequency  with  which  tuberculosis  is  an  infection  of 
the  lung,  and  it  has  been  shown  that  the  tubercle  bacilli  usually  reach  the  lung  irre- 
spective of  the  manner  of  their  introduction  into  the  body.  For  instance,  tubercu- 
:  ihe  lungs  was  produced  by  inoculating  hogs  in  the  tip  of  the  tail. 
The  tuberculin  test,  with  proper  precautions,  w  I  to  be  about  as  accurate 

with  i  h  cattle.     Reliable  resui'  tained  in  97  per  cent  of  the  animals 

-     d.     It  is  necessary,  however,  to  keep  the  hogs  very  quiet  before  and  during  the 

.  prevent  i  jperature  from  causes  other  than  the  tuberculin. 

TL  s  i  the  year,  both  by  the  Bureau  and  by  outside  in 

gat<>rs.  have  tended  to  confirm  the  view  that  human  and  bovine  tuberculosis  can  not 
I  as  two  distinct      -     -  -    that  tubercle  bacilli  of  persons  and  of  animals  are 
not  distinct  and  separate  varieties  but  vary  only  as  a  result  of  adapting  themseh 
the  different  environments  encountered  in  different   -  :   animals,   and  that 

to  protect   persons  against   infection   with  tuber  :n  anima:- 

jsary. 
Whether  regarded  from  the  standpoint  of  protecting  human  health  or  of  promoting 
the  welfare  of  the  li  industry,  it  is  highly  important  for  our  farmer.-,  stock 

rs,  and  dairymen  to  eliminate  tuberculosis  from  their  h  : 
For  many  years  hog  cholera  has  been  a  cause  of  hi  the  farmer  and  a  puzzle 

to  the  rs  ago  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  d 

that  the  cause  of  the  most  acute  and  virulent  forms  of  the  disease  is  a  virus  that  can 
through  the  finest  lilter  and  is  invisible  under  the  microscope.     This  has  been 
confirmed  by  later  experiments  by  the  Bureau  and  by  Eur  -      During 

the  past  year  t :  ■  i  of  the  Bureau  have  been  directed  toward  developing  a  vaccine 

-urn  which  will  prevent  and  cure  the  1  remedy  has  been 

worked  out  in  an  experimental  way.  and  efforts  are  being  made  to  adapt  it  to  practical 
and  .  This  method  lias  been  patented  by  Dr.  Marion  Dorset,  chief  of  the 

Division  of  the  Bureau,  in  such  a  way  as  to  allow  anybody  in  the  United 
States  the  right  I     its     -  •  :ree  of  royalty. 

e  valuable  work  in  the  investigation  of  internal  paras:  - 

the  Bureau  in  1906.     The  pcevale;.  has  done  great  damage  to  the 

■  industry  in  the  eastern  half  of  the  Unit        -        s,  and  has  caused  th 
fanners  to  abai  ;>  raising.     By  carefully  studying  one  of  the  most    trouble- 

some of  these  parasites    the  stomach  worm.  .  u)  and  establishing 


THE    LIVE-STOCK    INDUSTRY    IX    190<3.  497 

the  principal  facts  in  its  life  history,  the  Bureau  has  placed  before  sheep  raisers  infor- 
mation (Circular  No.  102.  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry)  which  will  enable  them  very 
largely  to  prevent  its  ravages.  Experiments  indicate  that  it  is  entirely  feasible  to. 
raise  lambs  free  from  this  and  some  other  injurious  parasites. 

ANIMAL    BREEDING    AXD    FEEDING    EXPERIMENTS. 

The  experiments  in  breeding  horses  in  Colorado,  conducted  cooperatively  by  the 
Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  and  the  Colorado  Experiment  Station,  have  attracted 
considerable  attention.  The  object  is  to  develop  from  native  stock  a  strain  of  carriage 
horses.  The  stud  is  headed  by  the  stallion  Carmon  32917.  American  Trotting  Register. 
The  first  crop  of  foals  came  during  the  spring  of  1906,  and  while  it  is  early  to  pass  an 
opinion  on  them,  they  show  the  stallion  to  be  a  good  investment  as  a  sire. 

Experiments  in  breeding  Morgan  horses  were  begun  in  Vermont  in  1906  by  coopera- 
tion between  the  Bureau  and  the  Vermont  Experiment  Station,  with  the  object  of) 
preventing  the  loss  of  the  Morgan  blood,  preserving  the  type,  and  at  the  same  time 
increasing  the  size  over  that  of  the  old  Morgan.  Xine  mares  have  been  purchased, 
and  a  stallion  will  probably  be  added. 

During  the  year  experiments  were  also  begun  by  the  Bureau,  in  cooperation  with 
the  Wyoming  Experiment  Station,  in  breeding  range  sheep.  In  spite  of  the  great 
development  and  prosperity  of  the  sheep  industry  of  the  West,  breeding  methods  are 
not  systematic,  and  most  breeders  are  continually  crossing,  the  result  being  a  lack  of 
uniformity  in  the  stock  and.  to  a  certain  extent,  a  failure  to  attain  as  high  a  standard 
as  might  otherwise  be  possible.  The  requirement  of  the  range  is  a  breed  of  sheep  that 
will  yield  a  profitable  clip  of  wool,  produce  good  mutton  lambs,  and  that  will  stand 
flocking  in  large  numbers.  It  is  believed  to  be  possible  to  combine  these  character- 
istics in  one  breed  of  sheep,  and  this  is  the  object  of  the  experiments. 

The  Bureau  being  urged  to  undertake  experiments  to  counteract  the  supposed 
decline  in  fecundity  of  Poland-China  sows,  made  a  careful  study  of  the  pedigree  records: 
for  several  years,  with  the  surprising  result  that  the  average  litter  was  found  to  have 
increased  from  7.04  pigs  in  1882-1886  to  7.52  in  1898-1902.  Similar  studies  for  the 
Duroc-Jerseys  showed  the  rate  to  be  practically  stationary  at  about  9.25. 

The  following  cooperative  experiments  are  also  under  way  and  are  progressing  satis- 
factorily: Animal  nutrition,  studied  with  the  respiration  calorimeter  (Pennsylvania); 
oeef  production  in  the  South  (Alabama);  poultry  breeding  and  management  (Maine), 
and  turkey  breeding  with  the  object  of  developing  resistance  to  the  disease  known 
as  blackhead  i  Rhode  Island).  The  Maine  poultry  experiments  have  shown  that 
the  egg-laying  capacity  of  hens  may  be  increased  by  selective  breeding  and  proper 
feeding.  Several  of  the  hens  have  laid  more  than  200  eggs  in  one  year.  The  success 
of  this  work  means  a  substantial  addition  to  the  income  of  the  farmers  of  the  country. 
During  the  year  the  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  began  experiments  near  Washington, 
D.  C,  in  feeding  poultry  to  test  the  relative  values  of  moist  mash,  dry  mash,  and 
so-called  self-feeding  hoppers. 

PEDIGREE    REGISTRATION. 

The  regulations  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture  with  regard  to  the  pedigree  regis- 
tration of  animals  imported  for  breeding  purposes  were  radically  changed  during  the 
y^ar,  new  regulations  having  been  issued  as  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry  Order  Xo. 
136,  effective  July  1. 

The  tariff  laws  of  the  United  States  permit  a  citizen  to  imporl  animals  free  of  duty 
for  breeding  purposes  if  they  are  purebred,  of  a  recognized  breed,  and  duly  registered 
in  the  books  of  record  established  for  the  breed,  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture  being 
authorized  "to  determine  and  certify  to  the  Secretary  of  the  Treasury  what  are  recog- 
nized breeds  and  purebred  animals.''  To  carry  out  these  provisions  the  Secretary 
of  Agriculture  certifies  certain  pedigree-record  associations  to  the  Secretary  of  the 
Treasury,  and  only  animals  which  are  recorded  in  these  books  are  entitled  to  free 
entry.  Foreign  books  of  record  are  certified  only  as  the  associations  controlling  them 
may  be  affiliated  with  American  associations,  except  in  cases  where  a  recognized 
foreign  breed  may  have  no  book  of  record  in  the  United  States,  in  which  case  the 
foreign  book  is  certified  direct.  It  follows,  of  course,  that  in  practically  all  cases  only 
animals  registered  in  American  books  can  be  imported  free.  The  Department  closely 
supervises  the  certified  American  associations,  requires  them  to  submit  annual  reports, 
and  examines  their  books  when  nec<  ssary.  The  certification  of  the  Secretary  of  Agri- 
culture adds  considerable  prestige  to  an  association  doing  business  in  this  country,. 
and  two  States  (Wisconsin  and  Iowa)  have  passed  laws  requiring  stallions  standing  as 
purebred  to  be  registered  in  a  studbook  so  certified. 

3    a  1906 32 


498  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    A0BICULTTJ 

.    THE    HAIRY   INDUSTRY. 

Results  of  great  practical  value  to  the  dairy  industry  were  accom] 
of  the  Dairy  Division  during  I 

•  experiment,  begun  in  1905  and  concluded  in  1906,  consisted  in  niai: 

-    :'  butter  under  different  conditions  and  carrying  it  in  Btc 
months  at  different  temperatures.     The  conclusion  was  that  light  Halting  :Uid  [ow 

peratures  and  the  use  of  sweet  cream  give  much  the  best  results  foi  -        _         itter. 
Further  experiments  with  the  -        _       I  about  3,000  pounds  of  butter  made  in  191  • 
still  in  progress. 

The  quality  and  character  of  butter  received  at  some  of  the  principal  mark*.-:  - 
studied  and  defects  reported  to  the  makers  and  creamery  owners.     En  a  I  ning 

this  work  was  looked  upon  rather  skeptically  by  the  butter  merchants,  but 
are  heartily  in  favor  of  its  continuance  because  of  the  consequ-  vement  in 

butter  and  because  it  helps  to  establish  confidence  between  the  butter  merchant  and 
the  butter  maker.     Over  a  thousand  creameries  h.  — I     I  in  this  way.  - 

of  them  to  their  material  advanl    - 

.ting  butter  tubs  with  paraffin  was  found  "  ;     i  method  ting  mold, 

and  a  simple  and  rapid  method  of  determining  the  WJ  "   nt  of  but: 

Both  these  methods  were  described  in  publications  issued  during  the  year.     The 
determination  of  water  in  butter  is  a    matter  of  much  interest  and 
the  butter  maker  and  dealer,  and  the  methods  previously  in  use  have  requu 
give  apparatus,  skill  to  operate  it.  and  several  hours  to  make  a  determination.     !■ 
use  of  the  new  method,  requiring  apparatus  g[butafewdollac 

intelligence  may  make  moisture  determinations,  the  time  required  being  i: 
to  twenty  minn 

Investigations  in  cooperation  with  the  Storrs  I  Conn. )  Experiment  Station  regarding 
the  manufacture  of  European  varieties  of  cheese  have  demonstrated  that  the  Oamem- 
beri  and  Roquefort  types  of  cheese  can  be  made  successfully  and  profitably  in  the 
United  States.     Experiments  in  the  manufacture  and  storage  of  Amelia 
have  shown  the  value  of  cold  curing  to  meet  the  growing  demand  i 

A  splendid  object  lesson  in  the  value  of  sanitary  i  was  given  at  tL 

dairy  show  in  February.  1906.     Milk  and  cream  were  shipped  hundreds  of  mil-  - 
kept  for  weeks  with  no  means  of  preservation  other  than  cleanliness  and  cold. 

Recent  improvements  in  milking  machines  have  led  to  their  introduction  and  • 
tical   use  in   some  of  the  larger  dairies  of  the  country.     Over  a  thousan  . 
machines  are  reported  to  be  in  use,  and  there  are  indications 

cal  use  in  the  near  future  and  1  important  tor  in  the 

industry.     The  Dairy  Division  has  made  a  careful  study  of  the  milldng  machin- 
boili  the  practical  and  the  scientihc  standpoint,  and  a   preliminary  3 
published.     These  investigations  are  being  continued. 

The  Dairy  Division  has  also  made  and  is  making .  -  ury  build- 

such  as  creameries,  cheese  factories,  barm    icehouses,  mi 
(.•rating  plants,  etc.     A  limited  nun  -  a  drawn  of  th<  • 

typ.  s  of  buildings  for  individuals  in  various  parts  of  the  country,  with  a  vis- 
ing the  conditions  necessary  to  be  met  and  fulfilled  in  buildings  for  thee 

The  inspection  of  renovated  butter  and  of  the  h  -  .  nder 

the  law  of  May  2.  1902.  has  resulted  in  a  marked  improvement  in  the  quality  of  this 
product.     The  general  sanitary  condition  of  fact  •  nateriaily 

past  years,  and  there  have  been  fewer  violati 

A  careful  preliminary  survey  of  dairy  conditions  in  the  South  J ■. 
first  step  in  the  direction  of  improving  and  developing  the  dairv  industry  ii 

on.     In  some  cases  -  were  found  prodw  ing     -  - 

expected  in  any  section  of  America.     At  other  places  milk  was  |  eaplv 

as  in  any  dairy  section  of  the  country.     On  the  whole,  there  was  an  er: 
for  dairy  products.     Almost  all  butter  and  cheese 
some  cream  being  shipped  a  great  d  •  Condensed  milk  an 

market  throughout  all  the  southern  cities.     Silage  is  us  nt  in 

the  South.     One  of  the  great  drawbacks  to  dairying  in  the  South    • 
of  cattle  found  there.     It  is  probable  that  th  -  tality  of  dairy  -  -       le  in 

large  pan  to  the  presence  of  the  cattle  tick  and  the  infection  of  1 

t  need  throughout  the  South  ion  in  unproved  methods  of  dairy  breed- 

ing and  feeding  and  milk  production.     The  invest..  -  •  there 

is  a  great  desire  on  the  |  nthern  people  to  know  more  about 

They  are  anxious  for  something  that  will  enable  them  to  £.-t  away  from  the  om  • 
system.     The  action  of         .  in  appropriating     20,00  -  :  this 

work  during  the  fiscal  year  1907  indicates  that   its  importance  is  begin:  : 
realized.     The  prospects  are  very  good,  and  there  is  every  reason  to  I  ■ 
work  will  be  the  means  of  developing  a  splendid  dairy  ind'ustry  in  ihe  South. 


PLAXT    DISEASES    IX    1U06.  499 

PLANT  DISEASES  IN  1906. 
By  \V.  A.  Ortow  Plank  Pathologist,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

This  article  summarizes  reports  on  the  distribution  and  prevalence  of  plant  diseases 
received  during  the  year  in  this  Department  and  the  several  State  experiment  stations, 
whose  cooperation  is  gratefully  acknowledged.  Especial  assistance  has  been  given 
>>y  the  following  collaborators  of  this  Department  in  their  respective  experiment 
stations:  G.  E.  Stone.  Massachusetts:  H.  H.  Whetzel.  New  York;  J.  lb  S.  Norton, 
Maryland:  A.  D.  Selby,  Ohio;  J.  L.  Sheldon.  West  Virginia:  F.  L.  Stevens.  North 
Carolina:  E.  Mead  Wilcox.  Alabama;  L.  H.  Pammel.  Iowa;  F.  D.  Heald.  Nebraska; 
H.  b.  Bolley,  North  Dakota:  W.  Paddock,  Colorado;  lb  Kent  beanie.  Washington.' 

Comparisons  may  be  made  with  conditions  in  previous  years,  which  are  recorded 
in  the  eight  preceding  yearbooks.  The  data  available  does  not  include  some  sections 
of  the  country,  and  the  distribution  of  the  diseases  is  not  fully  known,  particularly 
in  the  case  of  the  less  important  ones. 

POME    FRUITS. 

Apple. — Bitter-rot  (Glomrrella  rufomaculans  (Berk.)  Sp.  &  von  Schr.)  was  less 
destructive  than  last  year,  though  it  occurred  generally  throughout  Virginia  and  West 
Virginia  and  in  North  Carolina,  South  Carolina.  Tennessee,  and  Kentucky.  There 
was  less  in  Maryland.  Ohio,  and  Indiana.  It  was  reported  from  Delaware,  New 
Jersey,  and  Nebraska. 

Black-rot  and  Canker  \Sph.acropsis  malorurn  PkA  were  reported  everywhere  from 
New  Hampshire  to  Alabama,  and  from  Nebraska. 

Blackspot  canker  (Gloeosporium  walicorfias  CorcQey)  occurred  about  as  usual  west 
of  the  Cascade  Mountains  in  Washington  and  was  found  by  Doctor  Heald  in  western 
Nebraska. 

Blight  {Bacillus  amylovorw  (Burr.)  De  Toni)  was  much  more  severe  than  usual  in 
Delaware,  New  Jersey.  Maryland.  New  York.  Virginia,  West  Virginia.  Tennessee, 
Kentucky.  Missouri,  and  Arkansas.  The  loss  in  Nebraska  was  estimated  at  SI0.000. 
It  continues  to  spread  in  Colorado,  Utah,  and  Wyoming,  and  in  the  Sacramento  Valley 
of  California.  It  was  much  less  severe  than  last  year  in  Alabama,  Georgia,  and  North 
Carolina,  and  was  comparatively  slight  in  New  England. 

Blotch  \Phyllosticta  sp.  >,  a  disease  hitherto  unstudied,  has  been  described  by  W.  M. 
Scott,  of  this  Department,  in  Farmers'  Bulletin  283.  It  occurs  in  Maryland.  Virginia, 
West  Virginia,  and  Arkansas,  and  has  often  been  confused  with  seal)  by  growers  there. 
Spraying  experiments  by  Mr.  Scott  resulted  in  the  control  of  the  disease. 

Brown-rot  I  8<-l rotinia 'jnnti'jtna  I  Pers.  |  Schrt.  i  was  observed  on  apples  in  Nebraska, 
Missouri,  and  West  Virginia. 

Crown-gall  was  increasingly  serious  in  Colorado.  Utah,  and  Washington,  and  very 
common  in  Maryland.  Kentucky.  North  Carolina,  and  neighboring  Stales. 

Fly-speck  CLcptothyrium  pomi   (Mont.  &  Fr.)  Sacc.)  and    Sooty  blotch  ( Phyllochora 
■<na  (Schw.)  Sacc.  i  were  very  prevalent  in  Connecticut.  New  York,  Pennsyl- 
vania. Maryland,   West  Virginia,  and  eastern  Nebraska;  less  common  this  year  in 
Ohio  and  Indiana,  and  quite  rare  in  northern  Vermont. 

Illinois  canker  ( Nummuktria  (Hscreta  (Schw.)  Tub)  was  reported  from  Illinois. 
Missouri.  Arkansas.  Nebraska,  and  West  Virginia. 

Leaf-spot  (PhyUosticta  spp.  and  other  fungi  i  defoliated  unsprayed  trees  six  weeks 
before  the  normal  period  of  leaf  fall  in  Nebraska,  Missouri.  Arkansas,  West  Virginia, 
anil  North  Carolina.  Less  injury  was  reported  from  Ohio,  about  the  usual  amount  in 
Indiana,  and  considerable  in  Illinois.     There  was  very  little  in  Vermont. 

Physiological  fruit-spot  was  reported  to  be  much  worse  in  New  Hampshire. 

Powdery  mildew  (Sphaerotheea  mail  iDuby)  Burr.,  and  Podosphaera  o.vycanthac 
(DC  I  De  By.  occurred  in  Iowa.  California.  Washington,  and  West  Virginia,  especi- 
ally on  nursery  stock. 

Root-rots  (CUtoeybe  parasitica  Wilcox,  in  part?)  were  reported  from  Arizona,  Colo- 
rado. Washington,  southern  Indiana,  Arkansas.  Missouri,  and  North  Carolina. 

Rot  ( Penicillin),)  glaueum  Lk.)  was  mentioned  as  the  cause  of  decay  of  fruit  in 
storage  in  Nebraska.  Iowa.  New  Jersey,  and  Vermont. 

Rust  (Gymnosporangium  man-opus  Lk..  etc..  I)  was  reported  as  of  local  occurrence 
near  red  cedar  trees  in  Indiana.  Iowa.  Nebraska.  Missouri.  Arkansas,  Tennessee, 
North  Carolina,  South  Carolina.  West  Virginia.  New  Jersey,  and  Vermont. 

Scab  (  Venturia  inaequalis  (Cke.  |  Aderh.  I  was  unusually  light  over  the  whole  eastern 
and  central  western  parts  oi  the  United  States.  It  was  almost  absent  in  Idaho,  but 
was  worse  in  the  Sacramento  Valley,  California. 


500  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Pear. — Blight  B(vlllas amyloiorus  |  Burr.  De  T<  aii  was  more  prevalent  in  Connecti- 
cut. Massachusetts,  New  Jersey.  Man-land.  Virginia.  Kentucky;,  and  Smith  Carolina.  In 
New  York  it  did  more  damage  than  for  fifteen  years.  In  Iowa  and  in  Colorado  and 
Idaho  it  was  less  prevalent.  Spring  weather  conditions  in  California  led  to  a  large 
development  of  the  disease  there.     Utah  and  Wyoming  reported  inc-re.  - 

Leaf-blight  Entomosporium  maculatum  Lev.  i  was  less  prevalent  in  Ohio  than  in 
1905.  It  was  reported  from  New  Jersey  and  West  Virginia  and  was  more  severe  in 
southern  Georgia,  but  not  in  northern  Georgia. 

Leaf-spot  [Septmia  pirieola  Desni.i  was  reported  from  New  York.  Ohio.  Missouri, 
and  West  Virginia,  in  the  last  two  States  causing  much  loss  from  defoliation. 

Rust   Gymnosporctt  -      I)  was  reported  from  New  Jersey. 

Scab     Vt  ~na  Aderh.    appears  to  have  been  less  prevalent  in  New  England, 

New  York.  Ohio,  and  Indiana.  It  was  reported  from  Washington  and.  owing  to  spring 
rains,  was  in  California  still  worse  than  in  1905. 

Quince. — Black-rot  8phaeropsi$  malorwm  Pk. ,  was  less  severe  than  usual  in  Ohio, 
Indiana,  and  West  Virginia.     Estimated  loss.  6  to  10  per  cent. 

Blight  Bacillus  amylovonu  'Burr.  De  Tom)  occurred  as  usual  or  somewhat  less. 
Reported  frurn  Indiana.  Ohio   West  Virginia,  and  North  Carolina. 

Leaf-spot  | Entomosporium  maculatum  Lev.:  caused  serious  defoliation  of  quinces 
in  New  Jersey.  Ohio,  West  Virginia,  and  Missouri. 

Rust  {Gymnosporangium  sp.  I    was  observed  in  North  Carolina. 

STONE    FRUITS. 

Apricot. — Brown-rot  •  8derotinia  fructigena  'P.  I  Schrt.)  caused  considerable  damage 
;ng  twigs  of  apricot  in  California. 

Cherry. — Black-knot  [Plowrightia  morbosa  (Schw.)  Sacc.)  occurred  as  usual  in 
New  Jersey.  Ohio,  Indiana,  and  West  Virginia,  and  is  reported  to  have  caused  the 
abandonment  of  cherry  raising  in  western  North  Carolina. 

Brown-ro:     5  tigena    P.     Schrt.-  v.  revalent  in   New  Jen 

Pennsylvania.  Ohio,  and  Iowa:  25  per  cent  losses  were  reported  from  Missouri,  and 
as  high  as  50  per  cent  from  New  York,  sweet  cherries  suffering  most.  It  was  reported 
on  Prunus  bessegi  in  Nebraska. 

Leaf-spot     rylindrosporium    padi   Karat.)  prevalent   in    Ohio.    Indiana. 

Nebraska,  and  Iowa.  Serious  defoliation  was  reported  from  western  New  York, 
northwestern  Pennsylvania.  Maryland,  West  Virginia,  and  Missouri. 

Powdery  mildew  Podosphaera  oxycanthae  (DC.)  De  By.  was  reported  as  occurring 
on  young  trees  in  Colorado.  Ohio.  Iowa.  Nebraska.  West  Virginia,  and  Kentucky. 

Peach. — Bacterial   spot     Bacterium   pruni  Erw.  Sm.  defoliation  in  some 

a 

Black  spot  Cladosporium  carpophilum  Thum.  i  appears  to  have  been  more  prevalent 
this  year.  It  was  reported  common  in  Massachusetts.  New  Jersey.  Maryland.  Indiana, 
and  Kentucky:  destructive  in  West  Virginia:  in  Ohio  disfiguring  20  to  50  per  cent  of 
the  fruit,  in  southern  Missouri  70  per  cent  of  the  Elbenas.  and  in  Nebraska  -50  per  cent 
of  late  pea 

Brown-rot  [Sderotinia  fructigena  (P.     Schrt.:  was  very  destructive   this   year.     In 
jia  it  prevailed  throughout  the  peach  belt,  causing  losses  of  10  to  50  per  cent. 
In  Virginia.  Maryland,  Delaware.  New  York.  Ohio,  southern  Missouri,  and  northern 
Arkansas  it  was  mon 

Crown  gall  was  reported  this  year  only  from  Alabama.  Florida,  and  Ohio. 

Frosty  mildew  |  CereogporeUa  perskae  Sacc.)  was  reported  from  North  Carolina  and 
rirginia  as  causing  but  little  injury. 

Gumming  disease     '  which  has  been   in   California  for 

n  the  increase  and  has  caused  alarming  I  *hree 

re.     Early  winter  spraying,  advised  by  Mr.  M.  B.  Waite  of  this  Department, 
has  been  found  to  completely  control  th  £    ience,  XXV.  3 

Leaf  curl    Exoaseu*  d>j  -  reported  from  Alabama.  West  Vir- 

ginia, New  York,  Indiana.  Nebraska,  and  Washington.     It  was  more  prevalent  in 
ia,  Iowa,  and  New  Jersey,  and  less  bo  in  Maryland  and  Ohio. 

Little  Peach  has  spread  at  only  a  moderate  rate  in  Michigan  and  New  Y<  rk. 

Powdery  mildew   Sphacrotheca  pannosa  AVallr.    i.  was  reported  more  abun- 

dant in  New  York  and  in  Colorado. 

Pustular  spot  [SelmaUl  carpophibn     Lev.    was  less  common  this  vear  in 

Ohio. 

Rosette  occurred  to  a  considerable  extent  in  southern  Missouri  and  in  Georgia. 
Rust    /'/;>/  pmni  P.,  was  reported  as  occurring  to  a  slight  extent  in  Ohio  and 
North  Carolina. 


PL  AST    DISEASES    IX    1906.  501 

Yellows  occurred  from  New  England  through  New  Jersey.  Maryland,  and  Virginia 
to  western  North  Carolina  and  eastern  Tennessee,  and  west  to  Indiana  and  southern 
Illinois.  The  past  year  there  has  been  an  outbreak  of  unusual  virulence  in  western 
Maryland  and  adjacent  pans  of  Virginia  and  West  Virginia,  almost  completely  destroy- 
ing many  orchards. 

Plum.- — Black-knot  (Plourightia  morbosa  (Schw.)  Sacc.)  occurred  about  as  usual 
even-where,  from  New  England  to  North  Carolina.  Alabama.  Tennessee,  and  Ken- 
tucky, and  to  Indiana  and  Minnesota,  especially  on  the  damson  and  wild  plums. 

Black-spot  I  Clados poriu.m  earpophtUum  Thiim. »  was  more  injurious  in  Iowa. 

Brown-rot  I  Sderotiniafructigena  <  P.  |  Schrt.  |  occurred  as  usual  over  most  of  the  east- 
ern and  central  United  States.  It  was  worse  than  usual  in  West  Virginia.  Ohio.  Indi- 
ana, and  Iowa,  and  serious  in  western  Washington. 

Leaf-spot  [Cylindrosporium  padi  Karst.  i  caused  early  defoliation,  followed  in  some 
cases  by  fall  blossoming  in  West  Virginia  and  Missouri.  It  injured  20  to  80  per  cent 
of  the  crop  in  Ohio,  but  was  reported  less  prevalent  in  Indiana  and  Iowa. 

Plum-pockets  (Exoascus  pruni  Fckl.  i  was  reported  as  occurring  to  an  unimportant 
extent  in  North  Carolina.  Xew  Jersey.  Ohio,  Iowa.  Nebraska.  Wisconsin,  and  North 
Dakota. 

Rust  (Puecinia  pruni  P.)  was  reported  from  Georgia  and  Missouri  as  unimportant. 

SMALL    FRUITS. 

Blackberry. — Anthracnose  (Gloeosporium  renetvm  Speg.)  prevailed  to  the  usual 
extent  in  Ohio  and  Indiana. 

Crown-gall  was  reported  from  one  locality  in  Ohio. 

Leaf-spot  (Septoria  rabi  Westd.  >  was  reported  from  Ohio,  Indiana.  Nebraska,  and 
West  Virginia. 

Rust  {Gymnoconia  interstitialis  (Schl.)  Lagh.)  was  common  and  in  some  cases  destruc- 
tive in  California,  Florida.  Indiana.  Missouri.  New  Jersey.  Ohio,  and  West  Virginia. 

Cranberry. — Anthracnose  did  considerable  damage  in  some  localities  in  Massa- 
chusetts. 

Erobasidium  raccinii  (Fckl.  I  Wor.  caused  serious  injury  in  Massachusetts. 

Scald  was  more  severe  in  New  Jersey  on  account  of  excessive  rains. 

Currant. — Anthracnose  {Gloeosporium  ribis  (Lib.)  Mont.  &  Desm.)  was  reported 
from  Ohio. 

Cane-blight  (Xectria  cinnabar ina  (Tode)  Fr.)  was  reported  from  Ohio. 

Leaf-spot  (Cereospora  angulata  Wint.)  was  reported  from  West  Virginia,  Ohio,  and 
Iowa:  (Septoria  ribis  Deem.) from  Vermont.  New  Jersey.  Ohio,  and  Nebraska.  Con- 
siderable defoliation  resulted  in  both  cases. 

Powdery  mildew  (Spuerotheca  mors-uvae  (Schw.)  B.  &  C.)  was  reported  from  Ohio, 
Nebraska,  and  Washington. 

Rust  |  Cronartium  ribicolum  Dietr.  |  was  reported  for  the  first  time  from  New  York 
by  F.  C.  Stewart. 

Gooseberry. — Leaf-spot  (Septoria  ribis  Desm.1)  was  reported  slight  in  Ohio.  Indi- 
ana, Nebraska,  and  West  Virginia. 

Powdery  mildew  Sphaerotheca  mors-uvae  'Schw.  B.  &  C.)  was  prevalent  in  New 
Jersey.  Ohio.  Indiana.  Nebraska.  North  Dakota,  and  Washington. 

Grape. — Anthracnose  ■Sphaceloma  ampelinum  De  By.)  was  reported  from  New 
Hampshire.  West  Virginia,  and  Ohio. 

Black-rot  (Guignardia  bidwetlii  i  Ell.")  V.  &  R.)  was  almost  absent  this  year  from  the 
Lake  Erie  region  of  New  York  and  Pennsylvania,  but  in  central  New  York  and  the 
Sandusky  region  of  Ohio  there  was  great  loss,  as  was  also  the  case  in  southwestern 
Michigan,  where  the  loss  was  estimated  at  30  to  40  per  cent.  It  was  more  prevalent 
in  Connecticut.  Delaware.  Maryland.  Florida,  and  Indiana,  and  injurious  in  New 
Jersey,  North  Carolina.  West  Virginia.  Kentucky.  Missouri,  and  Nebraska. 

Downy  mildew  (Plasmopora  riticola  (B.  .i-  G.  I  Perl,  oc  De  T. i  did  a  slight  amount  of 
damage  in  Vermont.  New  Hampshire,  New  York.  Maryland.  Ohio.  West  Virginia, 
Kentucky.  Missouri,  and  Nebraska. 

Powdery  mildew  (  UncintUa  necator  iSchw.^  Burr.)  was  very  injurious  in  Florida, 
and  of  occasional  occurrence  in  Colorado.  Iowa.  Ohio. West  Virginia,  and  Pennsylvania. 

Persimmon. — Anthracnose  I  Gloeosporium  diospyri  E.  <fc  E.)  was  reported  as  of  occa- 
sional occurrence  in  West  Virginia. 

Raspberry. — Anthracnose  'Gloeosporium  renetum  Speg.)  was  troublesome  in  Ohio 
and  New  York,  and  reported  from  Indiana.  Iowa.  Wisconsin.  Nebraska.  Kentucky, 
Maryland,  New  Hampshire,  and  Washington. 

Crown-gall  was  reported  to  be  the  cause  of  serious  loss  in  Delaware,  Ohio,  and 
Nebraska. 


502  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Leaf-spot  (Septarie  nibi  Westd.)  was  common  but  unimportant  in  Ohio.  Indiana, 
West  Virginia,  Missouri,  and  Nebraska. 

Rust    Gynmocoma  nttcrstiHalis  I  Schl.  |  I  agh.  |  was  locally  injurious  in  Indiana.  Chin. 
West  Virginia.  Iowa,  and  New  York.     A  rust  doe  to  Kihneoia  albida  Magn.  was  rep 
from  Weal  Virginia. 

Wilt  {Leptosphoerie  coniothirriiim  (Fckl.)  Bat  -   injurious  in  Connecticut,  and 

was  reported  from  Ohio. 

Strawberry. — Leaf-spot  {Sphatrdla  fregariae  (TdL)  Sacc. |  was  common  in  the 
eastern  and  central  States  and  in  Washington. 

TROPICAL    FRt  ITS. 

Avocado. — Anthracnose  (Colhtotrichiuit  yloeosporiodes  Penz.)  blighted  50  to  75  per 
cent  of  the  blossoms  in  southern  Florida. 

Citrus  fruits. — Anthracnose  or  Wither-tip  i  L'olhtotrichum  glocosporwidts  Penz.) 
caused  heavy  losses  in  Florida,  the  blossom  blight  of  limes  taking  in  some  cases  TO  to 
100  per  cent  of  the  crop.  Wither-tip  has  been  common,  though  successfully  controlled 
by  proper  treatment.     The  same  fungus  has  injured  the  fruit  of  oranges  and  pomelos. 

Blight  prevailed  as  usual  in  Florida. 

Die-back  has  become  much  less  prevalent  on  account  of  the  more  rational  ue 
fertilizers. 

Root-rot  {Fusarium  limonis  Briosi)  was  prevalent  in  Florida  in  undrained  soils  on 
account  of  the  heavy  rainfall. 

Scab  |  Cladosporium  sp.)  was  much  more  prevalent  in  all  sections  of  Florida. 

Brown-rot  \Pythiacystis  citrophtharu  Sm.  cv.  Sm_),  a  new  disease  which  has  caused 
much  loss  to  California  lemons  during  storage,  has  been  worked  out  by  R.  E.  and 
E.  H.  Smith  of  the  California  Station  (Bot.  Gaz..  xlii.  215  . 

Giava. — Ripe-rot  {GUrmertUa  psidu  (G.  Del.  i  Sheldon),  a  disease  hitherto  uiide- 
Bcribed,  has  been  studied  by  Dr.  J.  L.  Sheldon  (West  Virginia  Station  Bulletin  104) 
from  material  collected  in  a  greenhouse  in  Washington.  D.  C.  It  occurs  in  Florida. 
Porto  P.ico.  and  other  tropical  countries. 

Mango. — Anthracnose  i  Colhtotrichum  ylocosporioidcs  Penz.1  occurred  in  Florida  as 
blossom  blight,  fruit  rot.  wither-tip.  etc..  according  to  the  part  of  the  plant  attacked. 
Heavy  losses  resulted,  but  careful  spraying  was  found  to  control  the  trouble. 

Pineapple. — Pineapple  disease  Thielaviopsis  cthaceticus  Went.)  caused  considerable- 
injury  in  Hawaii. 

VEGETABLE    AND    FIELD    CROPS. 

Asparagus. — Rust  {Pu.ccinia  aspmaai  DC.)  now  occurs  in  every  State  where  aspara- 

-  grown  and  continues  to  do  much  damage,  particularly  in  the  Central  and  Western 
States.     During  1906  it  appears  to  have  been  less  prevalent  than  heretofore  in  the  I 

Beak. — Anthracnose  [Cotletotrickum  KndemiUhumum  (Sacc.  &  Magn.)  Bri.  &  Cav.i 
was  very  serious  in  Florida  and  prevailed  generally  in  the  Atlantic  States,  though  it  was 
not  as  bad  as  last  year.     In  New  England  and  New  York  it  caused  exceptionally  heavy 

-  of  beans  grown  for  canning,  but  was  less  injurious  to  the  later  crop  of  dry  beans. 
Tin-  loss  in  Ohio  was  estimated  at  20  per  cent. 

Bacteriosis    /.'•  ;  :x.  ift  F.rw.  Sm.  |  was  reported  from  Xew  York.  Yew  Jersey. 

Nebraska,  and  Vermont. 

Downy  mildew  {Phytopthora  phascoli  Thax.  >  was  less  injurious  in  Connecticut  than 
last  year.  It  was  quite  prevalent  in  Delaware.  Maryland,  Xew  Jersey,  and  Penn- 
sylvania. 

Leaf  spots    Phyllosticta  phaseolvna  Sacc.  and  Iaa  Iseola  Sacc.)  occurred  in 

Wesl  Virginia. 

Powdery  mildev,-    E  ysiph   ;■  ilygom  D<  prevalent  in  Ohio. 

Rust  |  t  romyces  o/  P.    Lev.  1  from  Indiana.  Xew  Jersey. 

Ohio.  West  Virginia.  Pennsylvania,  and   Kentucky  and  was  abundant  in  California. 

Beet. — Curly-top  of  sugar  beets  did  considerable  injury  in  local  areas  in  California, 
but  was  less  prevalent  in  Colorado,  Utah,  and  Texas. 

Leaf-blight  |  ( 'ereospora  bcticola  Sacc.)  appeared  later  than  usual,  but  was  neverthe- 
destructive  to  sugar  beets  from  Nebraska  eastward,  particularly  in  fields  pre- 
sly  planted  to  sugar  beets.  It  was  more  noticeable  in  Colorado  than  formerly. 
Phyllosticta  bctac  Chid,  was  reported  from  Colorado  and  Xorth  Carolina. 

Rhizoctonia  root-rot  occurred  to  a  slight   extent  in  Colorado.  Iowa,  and   Michigan. 

Cabbac.e. — Black-rot  i  Bacterium  campestris  (Pam.)  Erw.  Sm.)  appears  to  have 
been  generally  prevalent,  and  in  some  cases  quite  injurious,  according  to  reports 
from  Delaware.  Indiana.  Iowa.  Nebraska,  Kentucky.  Louisiana.  Maryland.  New 
Jersey,  New  York,  North  Carolina.  Ohio.  South  Carolina.  Vermont,  and  Washington. 


PLANT    DISEASES    IN    1906.  503 

r  Club-root  (Plasmodiophora  brassicae  Wor.)  is  everywhere  increasing.  It  was  reported 
this  year  from  New  Hampshire,  New  York,  Xew  Jersey,  North  Carolina,  Ohio,  Ver- 
mont, Washington,  and  West  Virginia. 

Root-knot  (Ifeterodcra  radicicola  (Greef.)  Mill.)  was  sent  in  from  Texas. 

Wilt  (Fusarium)  continues  to  do  injury  in  old  gardens  in  North  Carolina. 

Cantaloupe. — Anthracnose  (Colletotrichum  lagenarium  (Pass.)  Ell.  &  Hals.)  pre- 
vailed in  Indiana.  Nebraska,  New  Jersey,  and  West  Virginia. 

Downy  mildew  (Pseudoperonospora  cubensis  (B.  &  C.)  Rost.)  injured  the  crop  to  a 
slight  extent  in  Ohio  and  Vermont. 

Leaf-blight  |  Altcrnarki  brassicae  var.  niyrescens  Pegl.)  was  again  the  cause  of  marked 
injury,  especially  in  the  large  cantaloupe-growing  sections.  It  was  reported  from 
Colorado,  Connecticut,  Delaware,  Florida,  Indiana.  Maryland,  New  York,  North 
Carolina,  Ohio,  Tennessee,  and  West  Virginia. 

Root-knot  (Hetcrodcra  radicicola  (Greef.)  Miil.)  was    reported  from  North  Carolina. 

Wilt  (Bacillus  tracheiphilus  Erw.  Sm.)  was  reported  from  Massachusetts,  Ohio,  and 
Indiana. 

Wilt  (Fusarium)  was  reported  from  Arizona. 

Cauliflower. — Black-rot  {Bacterium  campestris  (Pam.)  Erw.  Sm.)  was  injurious 
locally  in  Louisiana  and  Ohio. 

Celery. — Leaf-blight  (Cercospora  apii  Fres.)  occurred  in  Florida,  where  80  per  cent 
of  the  crop  was  injured;  also  in  Delaware.  Georgia,  New  Jersey.  New  Hampshire, 
Ohio,  and  Nebraska. 

Leaf-spot  (Septoria  petroselini  Desm.  var.  apii  Br.  &  Cav.)  was  reported  from  Dela- 
ware, New  York,  and  Ohio. 

Collards. — In  North  Carolina  collards  were  attacked  by  Allernaria  brassicae 
(Berk.)  Sacc,  Peronospcra  parasita  (Pers.)  De  By.,  Bacterium  campestris  (Pam.) 
Erw.  Sm.,  Fusarium  sp.  and  Plasmodiophora  brassicae  Wor. 

Cucumber. — Anthracnose  (Colletotrichum  lagenarm  m  I  Pass,  i  Eli.  &  Hals.)  occurred 
in  Ohio,  where  the  injury  is  estimated  at  25  to  GO  per  cent  of  the  crop,  and  in  New 
Jersey.  North  Carolina,  West  Virginia,  Nebraska,  and  Wisconsin. 

Downy  mildew  (Pseudoperonospora  cubcnsis  (B.  &  0.)  Rost.)  occurred  in  Florida 
to  a  serious  extent.  The  disease  prevails  through  the  winter  there  and  attacks  the 
young  plants.  Some  injury  was  reported  from  Massachusetts,  Connecticut,  and  New 
Jersey,  while  in  Maine,  New  Hampshire,  and  Ohio  there  was  a  serious  epidemic  in 
August . 

Wilt  (Bacillus  tracheiphilus  Erw.  Sm.)  was  reported  from  Massachusetts,  New 
Jersey,  New  York,  Ohio,  Pennsylvania,  and  Norfolk,  Va. 

Eggplant. — Fruit-rot  and  Leaf-spot  (Phyllosticta  hortorum  Speg.)  was  prevalent  in 
New  Jersey  and  on  Long  Island. 

Ginseng. — Alternaria  blight  has  been  destructive  in  New  York  as  in  preceding 
years,  causing  some  plantations  to  be  abandoned.  Prof.  H.  H.  Whetzel,  of  Cornell 
University,  reports  complete  control  through  spraying  with  Bordeaux  mixture. 

Root-rot  and  Stem-rot  (Rhizoctonia  sp.)  were  reported  by  Whetzel  from  New  York, 
Virginia,  and  Wisconsin.  Another  disease  of  the  stem  due  to  Phytopthora  caetorwm 
(Cohn.  &  Lei).)  Schrt.  has  been  found  by  J.  M.  Van  Hook  of  the  Ohio  station  in  both 
Ohio  and  New  York. 

Lettuce. — Drop  (Sclerotinia  libertiana  Fckl.)  was  very  injurious  in  the  Atlantic 
States,  especially  in  cold  frames  and  greenhouses.  Florida  growers  suffered  losses  in 
many  cases  of  70  to  100  per  cent,  and  the  disease  was  severe  in  Georgia,  North  Caro- 
lina, Delaware,  Ohio,  and  Alabama. 

Leaf-mold  (Botrytis  cincrea  P.)  was  reported  from  Florida  and  North  Carolina  as  of 
minor  importance. 

Leaf-spot  (Septoria  consimdMs  Ell.  &  Mart.)  was  reported  from  New  York  and  North 
Carolina. 

Root-knot  (Heterodera  radicicola  (Creel,  i  Mai.)  was  the  cause  of  complaint  in  Texas. 

Rosette  (Rhizoctonia  sp.)  and  Tipbnrn  were  also  mentioned  in  Ohio. 

Onion. — Anthracnose  (  Virmicularia  circinans  Berk.)  did  considerable  injury  in  New 
York. 

Downy  mildew  (Peronospora  schleideniana  De  By.)  was  reported  froni  Colorado,  New 
York,  Ohio,  and  Vermont.     It  appears  to  have  been  less  prevalent  than  last  year. 

Smut  (  Urocystis  cepulae  Frost)  was  reported  from  Connecticut,  Massachusetts,  and 
Ohio.  In  Ohio  the  formalin  soil  treatment  continues  to  prevent  the  disease,  but  some 
thousands  of  dollars  were  lost  on  untreated  fields  in  the  Scioto  Valley. 

Pea. — Powdery  mildew  (Erysiphe  polygoni  DC.)  caused  injury  in  New  Hampshire, 
especially  on  late  peas,  and  in  Iowa.  Ohio,  Nebraska,  and  West  Virginia. 

Ascochyta  blight  (Ascochyta  pisi  Lib.)  was  somewhat  less  injurious  in  Ohio  but  worse 
in  Xew  York,  injuring  50  to  80  per  cent  of  the  crop  in  some  fields.     It  was  also  reported 


504  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

from  New  Jersey.  J.  M.  Van  Hook  has  shown  in  Bulletin  173  of  the  Ohio  Station  that 
the  epidemic  in  that  State  the  past  three  years  has  been  largely  due  to  seed  infection. 

Potato. — Brown-rot  (Bacterium  solanacearum  Erw.  Sm.)  occurred  to  a  slight  extent 
in  the  District  of  Columbia,  Maryland,  Ohio,  Indiana.  Nebraska,  and  Washington. 

Dry-rot  (Fusarium  oxysporum  Schlecht).  Reports  of  local  losses  came  from  New 
York,  Ohio,  and  Vermont  this  year. 

Early  blight  (Altemaria  solani  (E.  &  M.)  J.  &  G.)  was  somewhat  less  prevalent  on 
the  early  crop  in  Florida  and  other  South  Atlantic  States,  but  was  more  injurious 
northward  on  the  main  crop.  Most  of  the  injury  to  potatoes  this  year  from  New  Eng- 
land and  New  York  to  Wisconsin  was  due  to  this  disease,  as  the  dry  season  favored 
it.  The  crop  in  Wisconsin  is  estimated  to  have  been  reduced  4  to  6  million  bushels 
by  it.  Its  occurrence  was  noted  in  Utah  and  Washington.  Great  loss,  estimated  at 
50  per  cent  of  the  crop,  was  reported  from  Wyoming. 

Leaf-blotch  (Cercospora  concors  (Casp.)  Sacc),  a  new  disease  of  minor  importance, 
has  been  found  in  Vermont  for  two  years  and  is  described  by  Prof.  L.  R.  Jones  in  the 
Report  of  the  Vermont  Station  for  1906. 

Late-blight  (Phytophthora  infestans  De  By.)  was  for  the  first  time  in  six  years  held 
in  check  by  dry  autumn  weather.  It  was  somewhat  harmful  in  Florida  in  May  and 
developed  on  Long  Island  and  in  New  England  in  June  and  July.  Dry  weather  later 
prevented  its  spread  and  the  losses  in  the  great  potato  sections  were  small  compared 
with  those  of  previous  years.  All  potato  diseases  were  controlled  in  Maine  by  the 
general  spraying  practiced  there  during  the  past  few  years  and  good  results  were 
reported  in  other  states.     Late  blight  was  reported  injurious  in  western  Washington. 

Scab  (Oospora  scabies  Thax.)  was  in  most  cases  reported  less  injurious  the  past  sea- 
son. In  Maine  and  in  other  States  where  the  danger  of  soil  infection  has  not  been 
considered,  an  increase  has  been  observed.  The  estimated  injury  in  Nebraska  was  15 
per  cent. 

Rhizoctonia  disease  (Corticium  vagum  B.  &  0.  var.  solani  Burt.)  caused  heavy 
losses  in  portions  of  Colorado  and  Wyoming  and  was  reported  from  Arizona.  It  was 
less  common  this  year  in  Florida,  Ohio,  and  the  Eastern  States. 

Salsify — Root-knot  (Heterodera  radicicola  (Greef .)  Mul.)  was  injurious  in  one  locality 
in  North  Carolina. 

White  rust  (Cystopus  tragopogonis  Tul.)  was  reported  from  Nebraska. 

Squash — Bacterial  wilt  (Bacillus  tracheiphilus  Erw.  Sm.)  was  reported  from  New 
York.     A  Fusarinm  wilt  occurred  in  Arizona. 

Sugar  Cane — Dr.  N.  A.  Cobb  has  issued  from  the  Hawaiian  Sugar  Planters'  Experi- 
ment Station,  Bulletin  No.  5  on  Fungus  Maladies  of  the  Sugar  Cane,  an  important 
monograph.  The  prevalence  of  the  diseases  mentioned  for  1906  is  given  by  Doctor 
Cobb  as  follows: 

Eleau  caused  small  losses,  estimated  at  less  than  1  per  cent. 

Pineapple  disease  (  Thielaviopsis  ethaceticus  Went.)  prevailed  about  as  usual,  causing 
losses  varying  from  1  to  10  per  cent. 

Rind  disease  (  Melanconium  sp.)  was  less  prevalent,  though  losses  in  some  cases 
amounted  to  25  per  cent. 

Root  disease  {Ithyphallvx  coralloides  Cobb.)  destroyed  10  per  cent  of  the  crop  in  the 
worst  districts,  but,  following  the  discovery  of  the  parasite,  good  results  have  come 
from  the  treatment  advised.  Root  disease  ( Marasmitis  saccharii  Wak.)  was  somewhat 
more  prevalent,  the  loss  being  estimated  as  high  as  10  per  cent  of  the  ratoon  crop. 

Leaf-splitting  disease  (  Mycosphaerella  striatiformans  Cobb.),  a  serious  trouble,  has  been 
found  by  Doctor  Cobb  to  be  due  to  the  fungus  named. 

Sweet  potatoes. — The  following  diseases  were  reported  from  the  States  named. 
Their  actual  distribution  is  no  doubt  more  general. 

Black-rot  {Ceratocystis  fimbriate  Ell.  &  Hals.),  Alabama,  Ohio,  Tennessee. 

Dry-rot  (Phoma  batatae  Ell.  &  Hals.),  Alabama,  Tennessee. 

Leaf-spot  (Phyllosticta  bataticola  Ell.  <&  Mart.),  North  Carolina. 

Soft-rot  (Rhtopus  nigricans  Ehrb.)  Alabama,  North  Carolina,  Maryland,  very  bad. 

Soil-rot  (Acrocystis  batatas  Ell.  &  Hals.),  Alabama. 

Stem-rot  (Xcctria  ipomoeae  Hals.),  Ohio. 

White-rot  (Peniciltium  sp.),  Alabama,  serious. 

White-rust  (Pytopus  ipomoeae-pouduranae  (Schw.)  Farl.),  Georgia. 

Tobacco. — Bed-rot  (Rhizoctonia  sp.)  prevailed  as  usual  in  Ohio,  the  estimated  loss 
being  7  per  cent.  Dr.  A.  D.  Selby,  at  the  Ohio  station,  finds  soil  treatment  with  for- 
malin to  assist  in  its  control. 

Broom-rape  (Orobanche  ludoviciana  Nutt.i  occurred  in  very  local  areas  in  Ohio. 

Mosaic  disease  was  troublesome  in  the  Chemung  Valley.  New  York,  but  less  common 
in  Ohio. 

Root-rot  (Thielavia  basicola  Zopf. )  was  quite  injurious  to  tobacco  seedlings  in  Con- 
necticut and  to  a  lesser  extent  in  Ohio. 


PLANT    DISEASES    IX    1P06.  5(35 

Wilt,  bacterial. — The  Granville  wilt  in  North  Carolina  was  estimated  as  40  per  cent 
more  destructive  than  last  year,  causing  a  loss  of  $20,000. 

Tomato — Anthracnose  (  CoUetotrichum  phomoidcs  (Sacc.)  Chest.)  was  reported  from 
New  Jersey,  New  York,  Ohio,  and  North  Dakota. 

Blight  (Bacterium  solanacearum  Erw.  Sm.)  was  reported  from  New  Jersey,  North 
Carolina,  and  Alabama. 

Leaf-mold  (Cladosporium  fulrum  Cke.)  caused  complaint  in  Xew  Hampshire. 

Leaf-spot  iSeptoria  lycopersui  Speg.)  was  prevalent  in  Delaware.  Maine,  Maryland, 
Nebraska,  Xew  Jersey.  New  York,  and  "West  Virginia,  i  Altemaria  solcnu  (E.  &  M.)  J. 
&  G.)  was  reported  as  of  minor  importance  in  Maine,  Ohio,  and  West  Virginia. 

Point-rot  was  more  destructive  than  usual  in  California  and  in  Xew  York  and  Ver- 
mont, but  less  so  in  Ohio.     It  was  reported  from  Alabama.  Maine,  and  West  Virginia. 

Root-knot  (Heterodcra  radicicola  (Greet. )  Mul.)  was  injurious  in  Arizona  and  Florida. 

Western  blight  was  much  less  prevalent  in  Utah  this  year,  but  was  bad  in  Washington, 
causing  losses  of  35  to  90  per  cent,  and  in  Colorado. 

Wilt  (  Fusarium  sp.)  caused  losses  of  25  per  cent  in  portions  of  Arizona  and  Louisiana. 
It  is  widely  prevalent  in  Florida,  but  losses  are  avoided  there  by  rotation  of  crops.  It 
was  less  abundant  in  California. 

Turnip. — Black-rot  [Bacterium  carnpestris  (Pam.)  Erw.  Sm.)  caused  unimportant 
injuries  in  Ohio. 

Club-root  ( Plasmodiophora  brassicae  Wor. )  was  this  year  reported  on  this  host  only 
from  Ohio  and  Xew  Jersey. 

Watermelon". — Anthracnose  (CoUetotrichum  lagenarium  |  Pass.  >  Ell.  &  Hals.)  was 
epidemic  in  the  Ohio  Valley,  especially  in  West  Virginia.  It  was  reported  also  from 
Xebraska.  Indiana,  Ohio,  Rhode  Island,  and  South  Carolina. 

Downy  mildew  (Pseudoperonospora  cubensis  (B.  &  C.)  Rost.)  was  observed  in  Ohio. 

Leaf-spot  (Cercospora  citrulina  Cke.)  was  reported  to  occur  to  a  slight  extent  in 
West  Virginia. 

Wilt  |  Xeocosmospora  vasinfeeta  var.  nivea  Erw.  Sm.)  occurred  as  usual  in  the  South 
Atlantic  States  from  Florida  to  Virginia. 


Barley. — Mildew  \Erysiphe  graminis  DC.)  was  reported  injurious  to  beardless 
barley  in  one  locality  in  Xew  York. 

Rust  [Puccinia  graminis  P.  I  was  as  usual  widely  distributed,  but  not  injurious  to 
the  crop. 

Covered  smut  (Ustilago  horde  i  (P.)  Kell.  &  Sw.)  prevailed  as  usual  in  Iowa.  Min- 
nesota. North  Dakota,  and  neighboring  States. 

Loose  smut  (Ustilago  nuda  (Jens.)  Kell.  &  Sw.)  was  widely  distributed  and  inju- 
rious. The  loss  was  estimated  at  7  to  10  per  cent  in  Wisconsin  and  Minnesota  and 
appears  to  be  increasing. 

Yellow-leaf  (Helminthosporium  gramineum  Rbh.*  was  more  prevalent  in  Iowa, 
attacking  probably  1  per  cent  of  the  crop. 

Corn. — Leaf-Might  (Helminthosporium  inconspictntm  C.  &  E.)  was  locally  abun- 
dant in  Maryland,  Ohio,  and  West  Virginia. 

Mold  (a  sterile  fungus)  injured  5  to  50  per  cent  of  the  mature  crop  in  North  Carolina. 

Rust  i Puccinia  sorghi  Schw.  I  is  widely  distributed,  but  seldom  injurious.  One  case 
of  severe  loss  was  reported  from  Vermont. 

Smut  (  Ustilago  zeae  (Beckm.)  TJnger)  occurred  everywhere.  The  average  loss  for 
the  whole  country  was  1  to  2  per  cent  of  the  total  crop.  It  was  especially"prevaki:T 
last  year  in  North  Dakota.     The  losses  in  Xebraska  were  estimated  at  2  to  10  per  cent. 

Millet. — Smut  i  Ustilago  crameri  Kom.)  was  of  slight  occurrence  in  Ohio  and  Min- 
nesota. 

Oats. — Rusts  {Puccinia  graminis  P.  and  P.  coronata  Cda.)  occurred  about  as  usual 
or  a  little  less,  the  late  varieties  as  usual  suffering  most. 

Smut  (  Ustilago  avenae  (P.)  Jens.)  occurred  everywhere  as  usual,  but  appeared  to 
be  relatively  worse  in  the  South  I  12  per  cent  in  Xorth  Carolina).  In  the  northern 
Mississippi  Valley  seed  treatment  is  more  generally  applied.  The  loss  in  Wisconsin 
was  estimated  at  5  per  cent.     Reports  of  loss  come"  from  western  Washington  also. 

Rice. — Black  smut  i  Tilhtia  horrida  Tak.)  was  reported  from  two  localities  in  Lou- 
isiana. 

Blast  was  almost  absent  in  South  Carolina  this  year,  the  season  being  very  wet. 
It  occurred  locally  in  Texa*. 

Green  smut  (Ustilaginoidea  rirens  (Cke.)  Tak.)  has  been  known  to  occur  in  this 
country  for  five  years,  but  only  to  a  slight  extent.  It  appears,  however,  to  be  on  the 
increase. 

Rye. — Ergot  (Claciccps  purpurea  (Ft.)  Tul.)  was  reported  from  Ohio  and  Minnesota. 


YEARBOOK    of    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Bust3    Puccinia  rubigo-  Wint.  and   P.  ornminis  P.  I,  though  everywhere 

present,  do  no  serious  damage. 

Sorghum. — Blight  sorgJri  Burr,  |  caused    hisses   estimated   in   Iowa   and 

Ohio  at  about  5  per  cent.     Reported  from  Nebraska. 

Smut    Sphacdotha  Link. |  Clint,    has  assumed  serious  proportions  in  Kan- 

1  'klahoma.  and    the  Texas   Panhandle   and   is  rapidly  spreadir ig       S         'iana 
(Kuhn*  Clint.i  was  widely  distributed,  but  not  in  serious  quantity. 

Wheat. — Leaf-bligr.-  -  reported  from  Nebraska. 

Leaf-rust  -tractive  in  the  northern 

Valley  and  the  southern  Great  Plains  region,  the  injury  being  estimated 
by  Prof.  H.  L.  Boiley  at  10  per  cent  in  North  Dak 

Stem-rust    Puccinia  graininii  P.  I  was  less  injurious  than  usual   in  nearly  all  the 
-. 

Scab    Fisarium  culrnor  ■    -        -  *  to  have  been,  much 

alent  this  year. 

Loose  smut     T'stilago  tritici  (P.    J<  Mely  distributed  and  increasing  in  the 

no  and  Middle  Western  St 

Stinking  smut     TUletiafoetaru    B.  &  <  .    Tul.  I  was  widespread  and  abundant, 
cially  where  seed  wheat  was  not  treated.     T:.-  estimated  loss  in  Arizona  wa 
per  cent:  in  Indiana.  2  per  cent:  in  Washington.  10  to  15  per  cent. 

FORAGE    CROPS. 

Alfalfa. — Bacterial  blight,  a  new  disease,  reported  by  Pi  1.  W.  Paddock,  in  I 
Bulletin  28      Ethel     loi         -.ai'-n.  was  hrst  seen  there  in  1903.  but  is  now  more  abun- 
dant, and  has  also  appeared  in  Utah  and  Ka: 
Anthracnose    CoUetotrichum  tri/olii  B.  &  E.   was  reported  from  Tennessee. 
Dodder    '      ■■•/to  epithymum  1  me  quite  widely  distributed  with 

the  extension  of  alfalfa  culture,  but  its  dangerous  character 
nize  1  and  control  measures  adopted. 
Leaf-spot  'P-  ported  more    injurii 

"•"  Jersey,  and  Wyoming.     Most  States  where  alfalf.  rtthis 

it  not  as  a  serious  one. 
Boot-rot  was  w..r-e  than  usual  in  northern  Texas,  where  the  injury  was  considerable. 
but  less  common  in  Arizona. 

Bust    Uomyces  striatal-  was  reported  from  Nebraska. 

•"£R. — Anthracnose    CoUetotrichum  trifolii  B.  &  E.    is  generally  distril 
Tennessee  and  is  common  in  West  Virginia.     Gloeotporvum  eautivorum  Kirch,  was 
-eported  from  West  Virginia. 
Dodder    Cuscuta  epithymum  Murr. t  occurred  on  clover  much  as  on  alfalfa. 
Black-spot    I'hyllachora  Id.),  a  minor  disease,  was  mentioned  only  in 

a.  Kentucky,  and  West  Virginia. 
Leaf-spot     Maerosporium  sarcinae/onrte  Caw.)  tras  injurious  to  young  clover  in 
Virginia. 

Boot-knot  •  IPterodera  radicicola  Greet".  Mull,  i  has  been  found  by  Dr.  J.  L.  Sheldon 
to  be  widely  distributed  in  the  Ohio  valley  oi  West  Virginia. 

East    Cromyces  trifolii    A-  &  S.    Wint.  unor  trouble  in  Indiana, 

Iowa.  Kentucky.  Man-land,  and  West  Virginia. 

pea. — Boot-knot  and  Wilt    Hetarodera  radicicola  Mull.  <  and 

mospora  vasinfecta  var.  tracbeipkila  Erw.  Sm.  >  prevailed  as  usual  in  sandy  soils  from 
North  Carolina  to  Florida  and  west  I 

FIBER    PLANTS. 

— Angular  leaf-spot  and  Blackarm    Bacterium  malvaccarum   Erw.  Sm.)  was 
generally  distributed  through  the  cotton  belt,  though  less  prevalent  than  in 

Anthracnose    '  'oUetotrichum  gossypii  Swth.  i  was  injurious  locally  in  States, 

especially  in  western  Georgia. 

Texas  root-rot  was  w<  .r-e  in  central  and  northern  Texas  than  • 
very  heavy  losses. 

Wilt  Xt.oeosmospora  vasinfecta  <Atk.  I  Erw.  Sm.  i  is  increasing  in  the  Coastal  Plain 
from  North  Carolina  to  Florida  and  westward  to  Louisiana,  and  has  also  been  found 
in  Tennessee.  Missouri,  and  Indian  Territory. 

Flax. — WOt  . -■-■•ciated  troubles.  Anthracnose 

Jstotrichum  sp.)  and  Boll  disease  (AUernaria  -p.  •.  prevailed  as  usual  in  Minnesota  and 
North  Dakota,  though  progress  is  being  made  in  securing  the  adoption  by  tarn. 
methods  of  treatme. 


PLAXT    DISEASES    IX    1906.  507 

NUT,  FOREST,  AND  SHADE  TREES. 

The  following  diseases  have  heen  reported  as  indicated: 

Ash. — Rust  {Pucxinia  fraxinata  (Lk.)  Arth.  |  was  reported  from  Nebraska  as  less 
common. 

Balm  of  Gilead. — Leaf-spot  (Scptoria  populicola  Pk.)  was  reported  from  Nebraska. 

Rust  (Melampsora  populina  (Jcq.)  Lev.)  was  reported  from  Nebraska  and  West 
Virginia. 

Black  walnut. — Leaf-spot  (Marsonia  juglandis  (Lib.)  Sacc.  >  was  reported  from 
West  Virginia,  New  Jersey,  and  Iowa,  and  as  much  more  prevalent  in  Nebraska. 

Catalpa. — Leaf-spot  (Phyllosticta  catalpae  E.  &  M.)  was  reported  from  West  Virginia 
as  destructive  to  foliage  of  young  trees. 

Cedar. — Rust  ((ri/mnosporangium  macropus  Lk.)  was  reported  from  Nebraska.  New 
Jersey.  Iowa,  and  West  Virginia. 

Cottonwood. — Crown-gall  was  reported  from  Wyoming.  (15th  Report  Wyoming 
Expt.  Sta,.  p.  33.) 

Rust  (Melampsora  populina  (Jcq.)  Lev.)  was  reported  from  Nebraska,  Iowa,  and 
North  Dakota. 

Chestnut. — Anthracnose  (Marsonia  ochrolcuca  (B.  &  C.)  Humph.)  was  reported 
from  West  Virginia. 

Dogwood. — Leaf-spot  (Septoria  cornicola  Desm.  i  was  reported  from  Nebraska. 

Elm. — Black-spot  (Dothidilla  ulmi  (Duv.)  Wint.)  was  reported  from  Nebraska  and 
New  Jersey;  and  Gnomonia  ulmea  (Sacc.)  Thiim.,  from  Nebraska. 

Honey  locust. — Black-leaf  <  Lcptostroma  hypophyllum  B.  &  Rav. )  was  reported 
from  Nebraska. 

Horse  chestnut. — Leaf-spot  (Phyllosticta  pariae  Desm.)  was  reported  from  West 
Virginia. 

Kentucky  coffee  tree. — Leaf-spot  (Cercospora  gymnocladi  Ell.  &  Kell.)  was 
reported  from  Nebraska. 

Maple. — Leaf-spot  (Rhytisma  acerinum  (P.)  Fr.)  was  reported  from  Iowa.  Kentucky, 
New  Jersey,  and  Nebraska. 

Mulberry. — Leaf-spot  (Cercospora  moricola  Cke. )  was  reported  from  Nebraska. 

Pecan. — Powdery  mildew  ( Microsphacra  alni  (Wallr.)  Salmon)  was  reported  from 
Georgia  and  Florida  as  of  little  importance. 

Rosette  was  reported  from  South  Carolina,  Georgia,  Florida,  and  Alabama  as  a  seri- 
ous disease. 

Scab  (Fitsicladium  effusum  Wint.)  was  more  injurious  this  year  in  South  Carolina, 
Georgia,  Florida.  Alabama,  and  Louisiana. 

Pine. — Rust  (Coleosporium  senecionis  (P.)  Fr.)  was  reported  from  Connecticut, 
Minnesota,  and  Georgia. 

Seedling:  blight  (Cladosporiitm  hcrbarum  (P.)  Lk.)  was  reported  from  Nebraska. 

Privet. — Anthracnose  (Gloeosporium  dngulatum  Atk.i  was  reported  from  Ohio. 

Sassafras. — Red  heart-rot  (Fomcs  ribis  (Schum.)  Fr.)  has  been  found  by  Dr.  P. 
Spaulding  to  be  common  around  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Willow. — 31ack-spot  (Rhytisma  salicinum  Fr.)  was  reported  from  Nebraska. 

Rust  {Melampsora so.)  was  reported  from  Iowa  and  West  Virginia;  M.  farinosa  (P.) 
Schrt.  on  Salic  amygdaloides,  from  Nebraska. 

ornamental  plants. 

Aster. — Wilt  (Fusarium  sp.)  was  more  prevalent  in  Massachusetts. 

Yellows  was  more  prevalent  again  in  Vermont  and  Massachusetts. 

Carnation. — Rust  i  Oromyces  caryophyllinus  (Schrank.)  Schrt.)  occurred  to  a  slight 
extent  in  Iowa  and  North  Carolina. 

Spot  (AUernaria  sp.)  has  been  reported  from  Maryland,  the  District  of  Columbia, 
Pennsylvania,  and  Connecticut. 

Stem-rot  (Fusarium  sp.)  was  reported  from  North  Carolina  and  New  York,  and 
(Rhizoctonia  sp.)  from  Ohio. 

Stigmonose  was  found  in  Indiana  and  Rhode  Island. 

Chrysanthemum. — Leaf-spot  (Scptoria  chrysanthemi  Cav.)  and  Rust  (Puccinia  chrys- 
anthemi  Roze.)  were  prevalent  in  North  Carolina  and  New  Jersey. 

Petal-rot  {Botrytis  vulgaris  Fr.)  was  found  by  Dr.  P.  Spaulding  to  be  quite  prevalent 
on  exhibition  plants  in  St.  Louis.  The  same  fungus  also  destroyed  Poinsettias  in 
greenhouses. 

Hollyhock. — Leaf-blight  (Cercospora  althaeina  Sacc.)  was  reported  from  West  Vir- 
ginia and  Nebraska. 


50S  YEAEBOOK    OE    THE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AGBICULTUBE. 

Rust  Puccinia  malcaeearurn  Mont.)  was  destructive  in  New  York.  Massachusetts, 
New  Jersey.  Pennsylvania,  and  West  Yirginia:  also  on  Malta  sp.  in  Colorado. 

Lilac. — Powdery  mildew  <  Micros phaeria  alni  (Wallr.  i  Salmon)  was  reported  from 
New  Y  rk.  Iowa,  Kentucky,  and  West  Yirginia. 

Peony. — Leaf -spot    Cladosporium  paamiae  Pass.  |  was  reported  from  New  Jersey. 

Rose. — Leaf-blotch  AeHnonema  rosae  Lib.  Fr.  was  reported  from  Pennsylvania, 
Kentucky.  West  Virginia,  and  Nebraska. 

Powdery  mildew  <  Sphaerotheca  pannosa  Wallr.)  Lev.  i  was  very  prevalent  through- 
out the  Eastern.  Southern,  and  Central  States  and  was  reported  from  Colorado. 

Bust  Phragmidium  subcorticima  (Schrank)  Wmt.  i  was  reported  from  California, 
"inrmia.  and  Nebraska:  and  P .  turn  from  Iowa. 

Yiolet. — Leaf -spot    Q  "corpora  viola*  Sacc.    did  scime  injury  in  North  Carolina. 

Marsonia  violae    Pass.    Sacc.  I  was  reported  from  Connecticut  for  the  first  time. 

Yirginia  creeper. — Leaf-spot  Cercospora  ampelopsidis  Peck.  |  was  reported  from 
Nebraska. 

Powdery  mildew     Undnula  neeator    Schw.  |  Burr.'  was  reported  from  Nebraska. 

THE  PRINCIPAL  INJURIOUS   INSECTS  OF   1906. 
Prepared  in  the  Bureau  of  Entomology. 

In  accordance  with  the  plan  adopted  in  1905.  the  records  of  the  principal  injurious 
insects  of  the  year  1906  are  arranged  in  relation  to  food  plant  or  host.  The  reports  for 
the  subject  covered  by  each  division  or  section  of  the  Bureau  have  in  each  ca*e  been 
prepared  by  the  expert  in  charge  and  cover  not  only  the  records  made  directly  by  the 
Department,  but  all  the  records  available  for  the  year. 

In  connection  with  these  annual  reports  it  should  be  noted  that  for  the  great  mass 
of  injurious  insects  the  conditions  are  substantially  uniform  one  year  with  another. 
In  the  case  of  certain  insects,  however,  there  are  notable  local  outbreaks  here  and 
there  which,  as  with  some  of  the  big  grain  pests,  may  become  very  widespread  and 
amount  to  a  considerable  disaster  to  the  crop.  Any  unusual  local  abundance  or  new 
form  of  injury,  or  any  new  pest,  is  very  apt  to  be  reported  to  this  office  or  to  the  ento- 
mologist of  the  experiment  station.  On  the  other  hand,  familiarity  with  any  pest, 
and  with  the  remedy  for  it.  soon  leads  to  a  cessation  of  reports:  yet  this  does  not" neces- 
sarily indicate  any  diminution  in  the  numbers  of  the  pest  nor  its  disappearance. 
The  list  could  be  very  greatly  extended  if  all  the  injurious  insects  of  the  year  were 
included,  but  an  attempt  has  been  made  to  limit  it  to  insects  which  have  been  rather 
more  prominent  than  ordinarily. 

The  insects  affecting  the  great  staples,  such  as  the  Hessian  fly.  chinch  bug.  boll 
weevil,  corn  worm,  or  bollworm.  San  Jose  scale,  and  codling  moth,  must  necessarily 
be  the  cause,  one  year  with  another,  of  the  greatest  monetary  loss,  and  no  new  u 
unless  it  at  once  affects  a  great  staple,  wdl  ever  compete  with  these  in  this  respect. 
Such  newcomers,  however,  are  likely  to  appear  at  any  time,  a-  is  illustrated  by  the 
boll  weevil.  The  past  year  has  witnessed  minor  losses  from  a  number  of  insects 
which  have  not  previously  been  of  serious  economic  importance.  Such  are  the 
Mexican  bean  weevil,  the  asparagus  miner,  the  splitworm  of  tobacco,  an  Oriental 
moth  attacking  shade  and  fruit  trees  in  Connecticut,  a  sawfly  injurious  to  the  leaf 
stems  of  maple,  and  a  related  species  affecting  the  foliage  of  fruit  tr- 

Insects  Injurious  to  Cotton  and  Other  Southern  Field  Crops. 

The  area  infested  by  the  cotton  boll  weevil  {Anthonomu*  grandis  Boh.  was  greatly 
increased  during  1906.  The  eastern  limit  of  infestation  was  extended  to  within 
about  20  miles  of  the  Mississippi  River,  and  on  the  north  a  considerable  portion  of 
southeastern  Oklahoma  has  become  infested.  While  the  damage  inflicted  was  not  as 
heavy  as  during  previous  seasons,  the  resultant  loss  probably  exceeded  that  of  1905 
by  about   $2  D00,  making  an  estimated  total  of  approximately  >'20.000.000.     In 

the  central  and  southern  portions  of  Texas  unusually  dry  weather  during  the  growing 
d  greatly  reduced  the  number  of  weevils.     On  the  whole,  the  season  of  1906  was 
one  of  rather  abnormal  freedom  from  weevil  damage. 

The  total  loss  due  to  the  ravages  of  the  bollworm  |  Ileliothis  obsoleta  Fab.  I  probably 
did  not  exceed  that  of  the  preceding  year  and.  as  usual,  was  confined  mainly  to  T 
Oklahoma,  and  Louisiana.     The  injury  to  cotton  in  the  two  northern  tiers  of  counties 
of  Texas  westward  from  Lamar  and  Delta  to  Clay  and  Jack  counties  was  exceptionally 
severe. 


PRINCIPAL    INJURIOUS    INSECTS    OF    1900.  509 

The  cotton-leaf  caterpillar  {Alabama  argillacea  Hbn.)  was  abundant  in  Louisiana 
and  portions  of  Texas.  The  defoliation  of  cotton  late  in  the  season,  however,  is 
beneficial  rather  than  injurious  in  territory  infested  by  the  boll  weevil. 

The  cotton  aphis  (Aphis  gossypii  Glov.)  appeared  very  generally  upon  cotton  in  the 
spring,  but  the  injury  inflicted  was  less  severe  than  in  1905  owing  to  the  increase  of  its 
natural  insect  enemies. 

The  cotton  square  borer  (  Uranotes  melinus  Hbn. )  seems  to  be  increasing  in  numbers 
from  year  to  year.  This  species  is  distributed  over  the  entire  cotton  belt,  but  its  in- 
juries have  been  most  felt  in  Texas  and  Oklahoma,  and  particularly  in  the  northern 
portion  of  the  territory  infested  by  the  boll  weevil. 

The  garden  webworm  (Loxostegc  similalis  Guen.)  did  considerable  damage  to  young 
cotton  in  certain  localities  in  northern  Texas.  Replanting  was  necessitated  in  some 
instances. 

The  cotton  red  spider  (  Tttranychus  gloveri  Bks.)  was  reported  injuring  cotton  in  cen- 
tral Alabama. 

The  cotton  leaf-beetle  (Luptrodes  varicornis  Lee.)  was  reported  from  South  Carolina 
and  Georgia,  where  it  inflicted  slight  local  injury  on  cotton. 

The  cutworm  (Autographa  rogationis  Guen.)  injured  the  stand  of  cotton  in  certain 
localities  in  northeastern  Texas  by  cutting  off  the  young  plants  in  the  spring. 

The  cotton  leaf-bug  (Calocoris  rapidus  Say)  was  very  abundant  throughout  Louisiana 
and  eastern  Texas,  where  it  probably  injured  cotton  to  some  extent  by  sucking  sap 
from  the  cotton  bolls. 

The  tobacco  thrips  (Euthrips  nicotianx  Hinds)  did  considerable  injury  to  cigar- 
wrapper  tobacco  grown  under  shade  in  Florida,  southern  Georgia,  and  eastern  Texas. 
The  injury  was  less,  however,  than  during  1904,  owing  to  greater  precipitation  during 
the  past  season. 

The  budworms  of  tobacco  (Ileliothis  obsoleta  Fab.  and  Chloridea  virescens  Fab.)  rank 
with  the  thrips  in  amount  of  injury  to  cigar-wrapper  tobacco  in  Florida. 

The  splitworm  or  leaf-miner  of  tobacco  (PhthorimAa  operciddla  Zell.)  has  come  to  be 
of  economic  importance  during  the  past  two  years,  owing  to  the  infestation  by  it  of 
cigar- wrapper  tobacco.  Its  injuries  have  been  confined  principally  to  a  single  county 
of  Florida. 

Insects  Injurious  to  Cereal  and  Forage  Crops. 

The  Hessian  fly  (Mayctiola  destructor  Say)  was  not  excessively  abundant,  except 
locally  in  the  east,  and  on  the  Pacific  coast,  where  it  destroyed  the  wheat  crop  in  some 
sections.  Indeed,  over  large  areas  it  scarcely  appeared  at  all.  In  the  central  Atlantic 
States  this  was  due  to  late  seeding  of  wheat,  made  necessary  by  the  extremely  wet 
weather  of  August.  In  the  spring-wheat  regions  of  the  Northwest  the  absence  of 
the  pest  was  due  to  the  prevalence  of  parasites,  notably  Polygnotus,  one  or  two  species 
of  which  seem  to  control  this  pest  so  far  as  it  is  controlled  by  natural  agencies.  This 
parasite  was  introduced  from  North  Dakota  to  western  Kentucky  and  Tennessee  in  the 
spring  of  1905.  During  1906  it  was  abundant  in  the  sections  where  it  was  introduced, 
and  was  repeatedly  observed  ovipositing  in  the  eggs  of  the  Hessian  fly.  The  peculiar 
breeding  habits  of  these  insects  render  them  of  the  utmost  value,  and  this  experiment 
indicates  that  they  may  be  readily  introduced  from  one  section  of  the  country  into 
another  perhaps  thousands  of  miles  distant. 

The  chinch  bug  (Blissus  leucopterus  Say)  was  excessively  abundant  in  northern 
Texas,  southwestern  Kansas,  and  northern  Ohio.  The  long  and  short-winged  forms 
again  appeared  in  the  timothy  meadows  of  northeastern  Ohio  and  attacked  grass  lands 
in  Florida . 

The  slender,  red  seed-corn  ground  beetle  (Clivina  impressifrons  Lee.)  did  great  dam- 
age in  many  sections  in  the  corn  belt  by  devouring  the  seed  after  it  was  planted  and 
before  it  had  sprouted. 

The  alfalfa  fields  in  many  sections  of  the  arid  regions  of  the  West  were  seriously 
injured  by  several  species  of  grasshoppers.  In  Wyoming  one  species  (Melanoplus 
differentialis  Thos.)  was,  in  some  instances,  almost  swept  out  of  existence  by  a  para- 
sitic fly  (Sarcophaga  georgina  Wied.).  This  fly  deposited  its  eggs  on  the  bodies  of  the 
grasshoppers  and  the  maggots  hatching  from  the  eggs  entered  the  bodies  of  the  grass- 
hoppers and  destroyed  them. 

The  wheat  jointworm  (Isosoma  tritici  Riley)  continued  excessively  abundant  in 
some  parts  of  Ohio,  Indiana,  and  Michigan,  though  several  parasites  appeared  to  be 
subjugating  the  pest.  A  new  factor  in  its  control  was  indicated  by  the  gnawing  of 
the  insect  galls  on  the  stems  of  wheat  and  the  destruction  of  the  larvpe  in  the  field, 
supposedly  by  the  short-tailed  shrew  (Blarina  brevicauda).  It  has  been  determined 
by  breeding  experiments  that  the  passing  of  the  grain  through  the  threshing  machine 


510  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGEKT'LTUKE. 

result-  in  the  death  of  nearly  all  the  larv;e.     This  enables  the  farmer,  by  cutting  his 
grain  hers  of  the  pest  and  thus  prevent  their 

ing  in  his  1 
Th-  -ai  hi-    A    ■  -  unusually  and  destructively 

abundant  dtryland.  as  -well  as  I  In 

Maryland,  where  the  injv.  inter 

ick. 
The  fall  army  w-™    I  erda  8.  and  A         -  fields  -man 

milb"  and  sorghuni  in  Texas,  sugar  cane  in  Louisiana 

in  Wyoming.     It  was  abundant  in  some  par-  ina. 

yet  determine'.  1  hundreds  of  acres  of  wheat 

durine  late  fall  in  Montana. 

ghnm  webworao  A oia]  sorghiflla  Riley  i  attacked  sorghun 

her  similar  insect  (J 

_■     Ya..  and  attacked  the  heads  of  timothy  at 
Arlineton.  Ya. 

Tv,  .       \       .iphorvts  pa  yll.  and  5.  venatu*  Say>  did 

oa  injury  I  \         Va.    larvae  oi  Sphenoph  observed 

dne  wheat  in  -  lina  and  Kansas,  a:  -te. 

.it-head  ai  1  the  he;, 

othy  in  meadows  in  southern  Minnesota,  and  tl  nny  w<..rm  | H.  umptoKfa  B 

did  serious  injury-  in  some  «  rginia  an  I  y 

Tw     c  ."  rrneades  tessellata  Harr   and  C.  puncti§era  Walk,    attack.?' 

...  while  a  "  "tacked  corn,  and  a  :  lena 

|  j  at.     Carnaedes  rubefaclaife  Grote  seri 

S      i 

_rain  aphis     Toioptera  grainmum  Rond                 malty  infested  wheat 

thegxau  r.oma  during  the  fall.     Its  unusual 

-  •          d  rendered  -                                                                ]x»or. 

Manv  Texas  En  -                                        on  account  of  the 

ted. 

The                          »  van  granaria  Buck,  and  if.  eerealis  Kak.  < 

i 

mmon  staTJk  tacked  wheat  in  considerable 

1  generally,  but  to  a  less  degree,  about 

Ind. 
The  smaller  -  '-onaria  L>  ibundant 

in  stems  of  wheat  on  th  Uureau  at 

.  Pa. 

Exsni 

The  common  spread  southward  to  Cincin- 

rd  itself  in  several  ..rolina.  these  repre- 

.  ,ve  been  invaded  by  the  apei 

The  more  injurious  in  1906  than 

•  ed.  and  is  now  particularly  I  principal  aspa:.  a    -- 

grow:: ..  it  bids  f.  ;ne  a  pest  of  considerable 

ed  in  Virginia  and  in  California. 
and  tJ  al  but  unknown  damage  by  this  species 

The  -  i>frmophagus]  pcctoralis  Shp.    was  identified 

species  has  not  hithert* 
rders.     Th  ne  likelihood  of  its  pern  .  dishnient 

-    ithern  Texae  and  else  -.btropical. 

The  pea  aphis  [Macrot  phora]  destructor  Job  repined  inju- 

irginia, and  111. 
and  i:.  Txas. 

ebworm  {LoxoUcge 
L.    was  reported  des  .     -    eet  fields  in  portions  of  Colorado. 

ilis  Guen.    were  observed  in  T 
jured.     The  siout  hern  beet  web  worm  \Pachy- 
-  concerned  in  injuiy-  to  table 
in  Texas,  where  it  occurred  with  the  garden  webworm  which  it  resembles  in  the  man- 
:  injury. 
The  beet  api.  -      erally  present  in  the  be*. 

-  the  beet  leaf-miner 
(P  :  Lint.  :  i'  .ah. 


PRINCIPAL   INJURIOUS    INSECTS    OF    1006.  511 

The  rhubarb  flea-beetle  (Psylliodes  pvnctulata  Mel?.)  was  very  generally  destructive 
to  young  plants  of  sugar  beet  in  California,  Utah,  and  Colorado,  its  ravages  extending 
into  British  Columbia,  where  it  caused  the  loss  of  many  thousands  of  dollars  in  hop 
fields.     It  was  also  injurious  to  hops  near  Sacramento,  Cal. 

Cutworms  devastated  fields  of  sugar  beet  in  Michigan. 

The  little  negro  bug  (Corimclacna  pulicaria  Germ.)  was  very  injurious  to  celery  in 
northern  Ohio.  A  somewhat  similar  species,  Cosmopepla  carni/cx  Fab.,  was  injurious 
to  potato  in  northern  Maine. 

The  striped  cucumber  beetle  (Diabrotica  vittata  Fab.)  is  always  troublesome  and 
the  year  1906  was  normal.  The  western  12-spotted  cucumber  beetle  (D.  soror  Lee.) 
was  reported  the  most  destructive  sugar-beet  pest  in  portions  of  southern  California. 
D.  balteata  Lee,  which  was  injurious  to  vegetables  in  1905  in  Texas,  again  did  damage 
in  that  State,  particularly  to  horse  beans  and  vetches.  The  related  D.  picticomis  Horn 
accompanied  it  but  did  less  injury. 

The  striped  cabbage  flea-beetle  ( Phyllotrcta  vittata  Fab.)  was  unusually  troublesome 
in  New  York  State,  including  Long  Island,  extending  its  ravages  to  Maryland  and 
the  District  of  Columbia.  The  larva  was  also  somewhat  injurious  to  roots  of  radish 
and  turnip. 

The  water-cress  sowbug  (Mancascllus  brachyurus  Harger)  attracted  very  considerable 
attention  because  of  its  troublesome  numbers  in  water  cress  grown  for  market  in  por- 
tions of  Virginia.  West  Virginia,  and  Pennsylvania. 

The  usual  amount  of  damage  by  cabbage  "worms"  was  reported  throughout  the 
country.  The  cabbage  looper  (Autographa  brassiae  Riley),  which  has  not  been  gen- 
erally injurious  in  its  more  northern  range  for  a  number  of  years,  was  somewhat  abund- 
dant  about  the  District  of  Columbia,  particularly  in  Virginia,  and  was  the  cause  of 
considerable  damage  to  lettuce  grown  in  greenhouses.  The  potherb  butterfly  (Ponlia 
napi  L.)  was  destructive  to  cabbage,  turnip,  and  other  erueifers  in  Montana  and  Alaska. 

The  harlequin  cabbage  bug  (  Murgantia  histrionica  Hahn),  always  a  pest  in  the 
South,  after  an  absence  of  about  six  years  in  the  latitude  of  the  District  of  Columbia, 
reappeared  in  noticeable  numbers  in  near-by  points  in  Maryland  and  Virginia. 

Root  maggots  wore  the  subject  of  less  complaints  than  in  the  preceding  four  or  five 
years.  The  seed-corn  maggot  (Pcgomya  fusciccps  Zett.)  was  injurious  to  turnips  in 
Alaska,  to  cabbage  in  South  Carolina,  and  to  sea  kale  introduced  from  England,  where 
the  species  is  also  injurious.  The  imported  cabbage  maggot  (Pcgomya  brassiest 
Bouche)  was  the  subject  of  considerable  correspondence,  but  injury  appears  to  be 
considerably  lessened  since  1905.  Great  injury,  however,  occurred  in  various  portions 
of  Alaska.  Elsewhere  the  insect  was  noticeably  abundant  in  northern  Ohio  and 
Minnesota.  The  imported  onion  maggot  (Pcgomya  cepctormn  Meade)  was  also  less 
injurious  than  in  the  two  or  three  previous  years.  The  chief  injury  reported  occurred 
in  Indiana.  The  black  onion  fly  (  Trilo.ra  flea  Wied.)  was  injurious  to  onions  in  por- 
tions of  Illinois  and  Minnesota,  and  was  associated  with  the  onion  maggot.  In  portions 
of  Illinois  also  there  was  another  maggot  on  onions,  Lonchxa  polita  Say),  while  in  Ohio 
the  barred  onion  maggot  <  Cho.topsis)cnea  Wied.)  was  destructive. 

The  tarnished  plant  bug  (Lygus  pratensis  L.)  appeared  on  the  whole  to  be  only 
moderately  numerous,  but  was  injurious  to  onions  grown  for  seed  in  Indiana,  to  potato, 
celery,  ornamentals,  and  pear  buds  in  Maine,  and  was  concerned  in  injury  to  beets  in 
California  and  cabbage  in  Alaska. 

The  onion  thrips  (  Thrips  tabaci  Lind.)  was  injurious  to  onions  in  Texas,  Massachu- 
setts and  Indiana. 

Injury  by  the  melon  aphis  (Aphis  gossypii  Glow)  was  somewhat  general  throughout 
its  range.  As  usual,  the  greatest  losses  were  to  cantaloupe,  although  other  melons, 
cucumbers,  cotton,  some  ornamental  plants,  and  others  were  badly  affected.  Many 
complaints  were  received  from  Texas,  Florida,  Kansas,  Nebraska,  Oklahoma,  and 
California,  somewhat  general  injury  was  incurred  in  Ohio  and  Illinois,  and  local  injury 
was  done  in  New  York.  New  Jersey,  Pennsylvania,  and  Tennessee.  In  portions  of 
southern  California  cantaloupes  were  almost  completely  destroyed.  In  Oklahoma  60 
per  cent  was  lost  in  some  localities. 

The  pickle  worm  (Diaphania  nitidalis  Cram.)  appeared  in  injurious  numbers  about 
the  District  of  Columbia  for  the  first  time  in  about  ten  years.  It  was  also  destructive 
in  Arkansas. 

The  common  stalk  borer  (Papaipcma  nitela  Guen.)  was  less  complained  of  than  in 
the  previous  two  or  three  years.  Local  injury,  however,  to  a  variety  of  vegetable 
crops  and  ornamentals  was  reported  in  New  York,  Pennsylvania.  New  Jersey,  Con- 
necticut, Michigan,  Missouri,  Illinois,  Iowa,  and  Mississippi.  Wheat  was  attacked 
about  Lawrence,  Kans.,  and  Richmond,  Ind. 

The  variegated  cutworm  (Peridroma  saucia  Hbn.)  was  destructive  in  California, 
doing  mischief  in  greenhouses  in  Minnesota,  and  injuring  vegetable  crops  and  berries 
in  Alaska  and  Mexico. 


512  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Injun,"  by  white  grubs  >  Ladmosterna  spp.  i  was  very  general  in  the  northern  United 
States  from  Xew  England  to  Iowa  and  Wisconsin.  The  usual  crops — potatoes,  straw- 
berry beds,  beets,  and  other  vegetables — were  affected,  and  much  complaint  was 
made  of  damage  to  lawns.  Injun.-  to  the  roots  of  strawberry  and  to  young  orchard 
was  reported  in  Oregon. 

Wirt  worms  were  more  injurious  than  in  most  years,  complaints  being  most  noticeable 
from  California.     The  principal  injury  was  caused  to  garden  vegetables  and  sugar  corn. 

Insects  Injurious  to  Deciduous  Fruits. 

The  codling  moth  |  Car)x>cap$a  pomondla  L.  )  has  been  for  some  years  notably  inju- 
rious in  orchards  in  the  Middle  West,  especially  in  the  Ozark  regions. 

The  apple  maggot  yRhagoUtis  pomondla  Walsh)  is  apparently  becoming  increas- 
ingly troublesome  in  some  of  the  Xew  England  States,  as  Maine.  Xew  Hampshire, 
and  Vermont,  and  has  been  the  subject  of  frequent  communications  during  the  summer 
and  fall.  It  was  also  quite  abundant  in  the  vicinity  of  Douglas.  Mich.,  attacking 
principally  the  summer  and  early  fall  varieties  of  apples. 

The  green  fruit-worm  Xylina  antennata  Walk,  i  was  reported  seriously  destructive 
to  apple  orchards  in  southern  Illinois,  boring  into  the  young  fruit  and  destroying  in 
orchards  a  considerable  percentage  of  the  crop. 

The  apple  leaf-hopper  |  Empoasca  mali  LeB.i  has  been  more  than  usually  abundant 
in  the  vicinity  of  Washington.  D.  O.  and  was  the  subject  of  complaint  from  the 
proprietor  of  a  large  nursery  in  Pennsylvania. 

The  spring  canker-worm  [Pahacrita  vernata  Peck  was  much  complained  of  in 
northern  Virginia,  central  and  western  Pennsylvania,  and  eastern  Ohio,  where  it 
appears  to  have  been  even  more  troublesome  than  in  1905. 

The  fall  canker-worm  (Ahophila  pomctaria  Hair.  |  was  received  along  with  the  pre- 
ceding species  from  localities  in  western  Pennsylvania,  where,  in  the  practical  absence 
of  remedial  measures,  it  seems  to  be  increasing  in  destructiveness. 

The  forest  tent  caterpillar  |  Malacosoma  disstria  Hbn. )  and  its  near  relative.  M.  plu- 
viatu  Dyar.  were  reported  as  very  abundant  and  destructive  in  Washington  State, 
attacking  apple,  plum,  cherry,  and  rose. 

A  tussock  moth  |  Orgyia  sp.  i  was  also  very  destructive  in  Washington  State,  causing 
ub  defoliation  of  orchards. 

The  yellow-necked  apple-tree  caterpillar  (Datana  mmistra  Dru.  I  became  quite 
abundant  in  appie  orchards  in  northern  Virginia,  adjacent  portions  of  West  Virginia, 
western  Pennsylvania,  and  Maine. 

The  red-humped  apple-tree  caterpillar  tSddzura  condnna  S.  &  A.)  along  with  the 
preceding,  was  very  abundant  in  apple  orchards  in  Maine,  the  two  species  causing 
considerable  alarm  from  their  depredations. 

The  trumpet  leaf-miner  |  Tistheria  rnalifolidla  Clem.  i.  which  became  very  abundant 
in  the  vicinity  of  Washington.  D.  C.  during  the  two  previous  years,  was  almost  equally 
numerous  in  1906,  though  it  was  not  the  subject  of  as  much  complaint  as  previously 
from  near-by  States  and  elsewhere. 

The  apple'  bud-borer  I  Epinotia  pyricolana  Murt .  I  was  decidedly  in  evidence  in  young 
apple  orchards  in  Virginia  and  Maryland  in  the  environs  of  Washington.  D.  C,  doing 
material  injury  by  boring  down  the  terminal  shoots,  thereby  causing  an  undesirable 
branching. 

A  climbing  cutworm,  Prodaria  sp..  was  troublesome  in  apple  orchards  in  northern 
Virginia  and  adjacent  territory  in  West  Virginia,  young  trees  being  practically  stripped 
of  foliage  and  the  branches  of  older  ones  more  or  less  denuded.  Injury  was  most  severe 
in  orchards  which  had  been  in  sod  for  the  past  two  or  three  years. 

The  pear  psylla  [PsyUa  pyri  L.  I  was  reported  seriously  injurious  to  Kieffer  pears  in 
one  locality  in  Virginia.  This  species  was  abundant  in  Virginia  and  Maryland  in  1894, 
but  has  not  since  attracted  much  attention. 

The  plum  curculio  (Conotrachdus  nenuphar  Ubst.)  was  the  subject  of  a  very  large 
amount  of  inquiry  from  various  portions  of  the  territory  over  which  it  is  distributed. 

The  peach  1  orer  Satin  inoidea  critiosa  Say  |  maintains  its  place  with  the  plum  curculio 
as  one  of  the  two  principal  enemies  of  the  peach.  Frequent  inquiries  come,  especially 
from  the  South  and  Southwest,  concerning  this  insect,  particularly  from  persons  who 
have  recently  gone  into  peach  culture. 

E  ■  ppe  prunifolldla  Chamb.  became  destructive  to  peach  at  Saugatuck.  Conn.,  fold- 
ing the  leaves  along  the  edge  and  also  at  the  tip. 

A  new  sawfly  enemy  of  the  peach  |  Lyda  sp.  I  is  reported  to  have  been  quite  injurious 
.ecticut.  The  slugs  feed  on  the  foliage,  stripping  the  trees  more  or  less 
completely. 


PRINCIPAL    INJURIOUS    INSECTS    OF    1906.  513 

A  plum  aphis  (Aphis  setarix  Thos.)  became  unusually  abundant  in  the  spring  in  parts 
of  the  South.  Numerous  complaints  were  received  from  southern  Louisiana,  in  the 
vicinity  of  New  Orleans  and  Lake  Charles;  also  from  Alabama,  Georgia,  and  Ken- 
tucky. The  insect  occurred  mostly  on  the  plum,  but  in  one  instance  the  peach  was 
at  lacked. 

An  unusually  serious  attack  on  the  peach  by  the  scurfy  scale  (Chionaspis  furfura 
Fitch)  was  noted  in  Georgia  in  a  block  of  three  or  four- year-old  trees,  the  insect  rivaling 
in  destructiveness  the  San  Jose  scale.  Judging  from  the  injury  caused  by  this  insect 
there  are  doubtless  two  or  more  broods  in  that  section  each  year.  The  species  is 
reported  uncommonly  abundant  in  certain  orchards  in  the  Hudson  River  Vallev  in 
New  York  State. 

The  oyster-shell  scale  (Lepidosaphes  ulmi  L.)  continued  seriously  injurious  in  Mary- 
land and  Pennsylvania. 

The  terrapin  scale  (Eulecanium  nigrofasciatum  Perg.)  has  become  very  trouble- 
some in  a  few  peach  orchards  in  western  Maryland,  and  its  occurrence  in  unusual 
numbers  was  noted  in  New  Jersey. 

The  San  Jose  scale  (Aspidiotus  perniciosus  Comst.)  continued  to  attract  much  atten- 
tion, especially  in  regions  recently  invaded  by  it.  It  was  observed  in  new  localities 
in  apple-growing  regions  of  the  Ozark  Mountains,  and  the  orchardist  of  that  section 
will  undoubtedly  have  to  contend  with  it  in  the  near  future. 

Another  scale  insect  became  prominent  as  a  pest  of  deciduous  fruits,  namely, 
Howard's  scale  (Aspidiotus  howardi  Ckll.).  This  insect  was  reported  abundant  and 
destructive  in  orchards  on  the  west  slope  in  Colorado,  infesting  pear,  prune,  plum, 
almond,  and  apple,  as  well  as  certain  shade  trees. 

The  grape  root-worm  (Fidia  viticida  Walsh)  became  a  very  serious  pest  in  the  Erie 
grape  belt  in  Pennsylvania,  and  was  somewhat  more  destructive  in  the  Chautauqua 
grape  belt  in  western  New  York  than  for  the  preceding  year  or  so. 

The  grape  berry  moth  (Polychrosis  viteana  Clem.)  was  seriouly  destructive  in  the 
same  territory  as  that  mentioned  above  for  the  grape  root-worm,  as  well  as  in  northern 
Ohio. 

The  grapevine  leaf-hopper  ( Typhlocyba  comes  Say)  continued  a  serious  grape  pest 
in  the  Erie  grape  belt. 

The  grape  curculio  (Craponius  insequalis  Say)  was  quite  as  destructive  in  West 
Virginia  as  during  1905. 

The  rose-chafer  ( Macrodactylus  subspinosus  Fab.)  is  apparently  again  on  the  increase, 
as  indicated  by  the  numerous  complaints  made.  Specimens  were  received  from  many 
localities  in  the  East-Central  States — for  example,  Maryland,  Virginia,  New  Jersey, 
Pennsylvania,  Ohio,  and  New  York.  Serious  injury  or  total  destruction  of  grapes, 
cherries,  apples,  and  peaches  was  noted  by  correspondents. 

Amphicerus  punctipennis  Lee.  was  received  in  grape  canes  from  Miami,  Fla.  The 
species  is  also  recorded  from  Tiger  Mills,  Tex.,  and  Riverside,  Cal. 

Insects  Injurious  to  Citrus  and  Other  Tropical  Fruits. 

There  is  little  change  from  year  to  year  in  the  amount  of  damage  from  scale  and 
other  common  enemies  of  citrus  fruits.  The  black  scale  (Saissetia  olex  Bern.)  and  the 
red  scale  (Aonidiella  aurantii  Mask.)  continue  to  be  the  prominent  pests  in  southern 
California,  and  the  white  fly  (Aleyrodes  citri  R.  &  H.)  and  the  purple  scale  (Lepi- 
dosaphes beckii  Newm.)  in  Florida.  Work  under  a  special  appropriation  for  the  white 
fly  is  under  way  in  Florida,  and  this  insect  will  be  studied  in  the  coming  year  through- 
out its  range  on  the  Gulf  coast. 

Very  good  reports  are  still  coming  of  the  South  African  parasite  of  the  black  scale  in 
southern  California,  but  the  work  of  this  parasite  has  not  by  any  means  eliminated  the 
black  scale  as  an  important  pest. 

Insects  Injurious  to  the  Nut  Industry. 

The  pecan  crop  of  Texas  was  reported  generally  short.  Only  two  insects,  however, 
were  especially  prominent  as  pests.  The  pecan  huskworm  (Enarmonia  caryana  Fitch) 
was  injurious  in  portions  of  Georgia  and  South  Carolina,  and,  on  the  authority  of  Mr. 
F.  C.  Pratt,  did  injury  also  to  walnuts  at  Boerne,  Tex.  Shortage  in  the  pecan  crop  in 
other  portions  of  the  South  was  attributed  to  this  pest.  The  pecan  weevil  (Balaninus 
caryse.  Horn)  was  somewhat  unusually  abundant. 

The  chestnut  crop  in  some  sections  also  showed  a  shortage,  but  the  chestnut  weevils 
(Balaninus  rectus  Say  and  B.  proboscideus  Fab.)  were  not  complained  of  so  frequently 
as  in  previous  years.     Loss  in  one  locality  in  Pennsylvania,  however,  was  estimated 

3    a  1906 33 


51-4  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

at  40  per  cent,  a  gradual  growth  beginning  with  5  per  cent  loss  experienced  five  years 
previously.  A  red  spider.  Tetranyehus  bicolor  Bks..  was  the  occasion  of  complaint 
among  chestnut  growers  in  portions  of  Pennsylvania  and  Connecticut,  and  this  pest, 
together  with  "blight."  was  doubtless  responsible  for  other  losses  of  which  there  was 
complaint. 

Insects  Injurious  to  Shade  and  Ornamental  Trees. 

The  brown-tail  moth  {Euproctis  chrysorrhoa  L.  i  has  extended  its  western  range  to  the 
vicinity  of  Amherst.  Mass..  and  seems  to  be  proceeding  in  a  westerly  direction  more 
slowly  than  it  has  been  spreading  to  the  northeast.  It  is  now  found  more  than  halfway 
up  the  Maine  coast  and  has  been  reported  from  Eastport.  It  occurs  in  the  two  lower 
tiers  of  counties  in  Xew  Hampshire  in  considerable  numbers  and  has  been  collected 
in  the  White  Mountain  region. 

The  gipsy  moth  (Ocneria  [PortJutria]  dispar  L.)  has  been  found  during  the  year  near 
Stonington.  Conn.,  and  several  colonies  have  been  located  in  Rhode  Island.  It  occurs 
very  generally  in  the  southern  tier  of  counties  of  Xew  Hampshire,  and  recent  scouting 
in  Maine  has  shown  the  establishment  of  the  species  at  several  points  in  the  south- 
western portion  of  that  State.  Its  western  limit  still  seems  to  be  in  that  part  of  Massa- 
chusetts which  lies  in  the  longitude  of  Worcester. 

As  a  result  of  the  widespread  interest  which  the  occurrence  of  these  two  species 
occasioned  in  Xew  England  and  neighboring  States,  certain  other  caterpillars  were  the 
subject  of  considerable  complaint.  Prominent  among  these  was  the  black  walnut 
caterpillar  iDatana  inUgcrrlma  G.  &  R.  .  which  attracted  attention  in  Xew  York.  It 
was  also  injurious  to  walnut  at  Bristol.  Tenn..  and  at  Roekford.  HI.,  and  to  pecans  at 
Staunton.  Ya.  The  hickory  tussock  moth  i  Halisidota  caryx  Harr.  |  was  destructive  to 
elni  in  Massachusetts  and  was  the  subject  of  complaint  also  in  Xew  Y'ork. 

The  sugar  maple  borer  iPlagionoivs  speciosus  Say'i  continued  to  be  a  serious  pest  in 
Xew  York,  and  some  complaints  were  made  of  its  injuries  in  Ohio. 

The  white-marked  tussock  moth  i  Hemerocampa  Uucostigma  S.  <x  A.  |  was  abundant 
during  the  year  1906.  but  not  nearly  so  troublesome  as  in  many  other  years.  It  was 
particularly  numerous  in  the  States  of  Xew  Y'ork.  Pennsylvania.  Maine.  Connecticut, 
Virginia,  and  Iowa,  attracting  most  attention  as  a  pest  in  public  parks  and  in  the  streets 
of  cities  and  large  towns.  It  was  similarly  abundant  in  the  District  of  Columbia  and 
in  Xova  Scotia. 

The  fall  webworm  \Hyphantria  cuiua  Dru.  >  was.  on  the  whole,  remarkably  scarce, 
small  colonies  only  occurring.  Among  the  localities  infested  were  the  District  of 
Columbia.  Lynn.  Mass..  Xew  Wilmington.  Pa.,  and  Xew  Y"ork  City. 

The  imported  willow  curculio  ( Crypt  orhynchus  lapathi  L.)  was  destructive  to  willow 
and  poplar,  especially  in  nurseries  in  various  parts  of  Xew  Y'ork  State. 

The  cottony  maple  scale  {Pulvinaria  innumerabiiis  Rathv.),  which  was  bo  abundant 
in  1905  practically  disappeared  as  a  pest  in  Xew  Jersey. 

The  false  maple  scale  (Phenacoccus  acericola  King!  was  abundant  in  several  cities 
in  Xew  Y'ork.  and  especially  in  the  vicinity  of  Xew  Y'ork  City. 

The  catalpa  sphinx  f  Ceratomia  cataJpx  Bdv.  |  was  very  destructive  to  the  foliage  of 
catalpa.  reports  of  defoliation  having  been  received  from  Xew  Jersey,  where  the  pest  is 
generally  distributed,  and  from  portions  of  Ohio  and  Alabama.  In  Maryland  and 
Virginia  the  species  was  abundant,  but  not  so  troublesome. 

The  elm-tree  borer  [Saperaa  tridentata  01. 1  was  the  cause  of  considerable  complaint, 
injuries  being  especially  noticeable  in  the  vicinity  of  St.  Louis.  Mo.,  and  Evanston.  111. 

A  new  oriental  moth  (  Cnidocampa  flavesctns  Walk,  k  whose  original  home  is  in  Asia. 
was  observed  on  a  variety  of  shade,  orchard,  and  wild  trees  in  the  vicinity  of  Dor- 
chester. Mass.  As  its  habits  as  thus  far  studied  in  this  country  show  that  it  is  capable 
of  subsisting  on  all  sorts  of  vegetation,  such  as  bush  fruits  and  rose,  there  is  danger  of 
the  permanent  introduction  of  this  species  into  America  as  a  pest. 

The  maple  leaf  stem-borer  < Priophonts  acericaulis  McG.  I  was  injurious  to  maple 
shade  trees  in  the  vicinity  of  Xew  Haven.  Conn.,  and  probably  elsewhere.  The 
species  has  not  hitherto  been  noted  as  a  pest  and  was  only  recently  described  because 
new  to  science. 

The  currant  leaf-hopper  iErnpoasca  malt  LeB.(  was  very  abundant  on  shade  trees 
in  the  District  of  Columbia,  doing  particular  damage  to  the  hop  tree.  It  also  attacked 
violets  grown  in  a  greenhouse  in  Yirginia. 

The  greenhouse  red  spider  ( Tctranyehv.s  bimaculatus  Harv.  |  was  extremely  trouble- 
some, both  in  greenhouses  and  fields  and  on  shade  trees,  its  injuries  extending  from 
York  and  the  District  of  Columbia  to  Illinois.  General  complaint  of  mite  injury 
to  shade  trees  was  also  made  in  Xew  Jersey  and  is  probably  attributable  to  this  species. 


PRINCIPAL   INJURIOUS    INSECTS    OF   1906.  515 

Insects  Injurious  to  Forests  and  Forest  Products. 

The  Black  Hills  beetle  (Dcndroctonus  ponderosse  Hopk.)  continued  its  depredations 
to  such  an  extent  in  the  Black  Hills  Forest  Reserve  of  South  Dakota  that  as  yet  it  has 
not  been  practicable,  owing  to  the  lack  of  sufficient  funds  and  other  facilities,  to 
accomplish  anything  of  importance  toward  carrying  out  the  recommendations  for  its 
control.  The  radical  measures  adopted  in  the  vicinity  of  Colorado  Springs  and  the 
Pikes  Peak  Forest  Reserve,  Colo.,  under  the  same  recommendations,  have,  on  the  other 
hand,  apparently  brought  the  pest  under  complete  control  in  that  locality. 

The  mountain  pine  beetle  (Dendroctonus  monticola  Hopk.)  was  the  direct  cause  of 
the  death  of  a  considerable  amount  of  lodgepole  pine  in  the  higher  elevations  of  the 
Yosemite  National  Park  and  in  other  localities  in  the  Sierra  Nevada  Mountains  in 
California.     It  was  also  reported  in  destructive  numbers  in  Oregon,  Idaho,  and  Utah. 

The  destructive  pine  beetle  (Dendroctonus frontalis  Zimm.),  while  continuing  to  be 
a  menace  to  the  pine  forests  of  the  South,  was  not  more  than  usually  abundant  in  the 
South  Atlantic  and  Gulf  States.  For  the  first  time  since  the  disastrous  outbreak  of 
1891-92  it  was  found  as  far  north  as  Virginia.  Investigations  in  the  southeastern  part 
of  that  State  indicated  that  it  had  been  present  in  limited  abundance  for  several  years, 
apparently  without  much,  if  any,  increase  in  numbers. 

The  spruce  beetle  (Dendroctonus  piceaperda  Hopk.)  was  not  reported  in  destructive 
abundance  in  any  section  of  the  country.  It  was  found  in  small  numbers  attacking 
spruce  in  New  Hampshire,  northern  Michigan,  and  the  Black  Hills  of  South  Dakota, 
and  the  western  form  was  reported  as  causing  some  injury  to  the  Engelmann  spruce 
in  Colorado  and  Wyoming. 

The  Douglas  spruce  beetle  (Dendroctonus  pseudotsugse  Hopk.)  was  reported  as 
destructive  to  the  red  fir  or  Douglas  spruce  in  many  widely  separated  localities  in  the 
Rocky  Mountain  region. 

The  larch  beetle  (Dendroctonus  simplex  Lee.)  was  found  attacking  larch  or  tamarack 
in  small  numbers  in  the  upper  peninsula  of  Michigan.  Although  not  at  present  a 
serious  enemy  of  the  tree,  it  may  prove  to  be  of  importance  in  connection  with  the 
depredations  of  the  larch  sawfly. 

The  western  pine  beetle  (Dendroctonus  brevicomis  Lee.)  was  found  attacking  pine 
in  the  Yosemite  Valley  and  other  localities  in  California,  and  reported  from  Oregon. 
In  Idaho  the  recommendations  of  this  Bureau  for  its  control  have  been  adopted  by 
certain  of  the  larger  lumbering  concerns. 

The  two-lined  chestnut  borer  (Agrilus  bilineatus  Web.)  was  found  in  Massachusetts 
attacking  and  hastening  the  death  of  oak  trees  which  had  been  defoliated  by  the  gipsy 
and  brown  tail  moths. 

The  white-pine  weevil  (Pissodes  strobi  Peck)  occurred  in  its  usual  abundance  in  the 
Eastern  States.  It  was  found  also  in  Michigan,  in  young  white  pine  reproduction, 
and  appears  to  be  increasing  in  abundance  there. 

"Cerambycid  borers  (species  at  present  unknown)  were  reported  as  injuring  telephone 
poles  in  Maryland  and  West  Virginia.  They  attack  the  poles  near  the  surface  of  the 
ground,  and  so  weaken  them  as  to  cause  them  to  break. 

Cedar  heartwood  borers  ( Trachykele  blondeli  Mars,  and  T.  opulenta  Fall)  were  identi- 
fied as  the  cause  of  serious  injury  to  the  heartwood  of  various  western  cedars.  The 
injury  has  been  long  known,  but  the  insect  causing  it  has  been  unknown  until  this 
year. 

Powder-post  beetles  (Lyctus  spp.)  continued  to  be  a  source  of  frequent  complaint 
from  dealers  and  manufacturers  of  hardwood  products.  L.  unipunctatus  Hbst.  was 
the  most  common  species  infesting  oak  and  hickory  spokes,  handles,  etc. ;  L.  plani- 
collis  Lee.  was  found  attacking  ash  lumber  in  the  South,  and  L.  parallelopipedum  Mels. 
injuring  persimmon  shuttle  blocks  in  Georgia.  The  red-shouldered  powder-post  borer 
(Sinoxylon  basilare  Say)  caused  serious  injury  to  last  and  shuttle  blocks  of  persimmon 
wood  in  Georgia  and  Ohio. 

The  larch  sawfly  (Holcocneme  [Nematus]  erichsonii  Hartig)  was  unusually  abundant 
and  destructive  in  the  upper  peninsula  of  Michigan.  Complaint  of  injury  was  received 
in  1905,  but  it  appears  that  the  area  over  which  the  larch  was  defoliated  was  consider- 
ably more  extensive  in  1906.  Defoliation  of  the  larger  trees  over  a  large  part  of  the 
upper  peninsula  was  complete,  but  as  yet  none  appear  to  be  dying  from  this  cause  alone. 

The  fir  tussock  moth  (Notolophus  oslari  Barnes)  was  the  cause  of  extensive  defoliation 
of  the  tops  of  white  fir  (Abies  concolor)  in  Mariposa  County,  Cal.,  and  was  also  found 
in  considerable  abundance  attacking  the  same  tree  in  Colorado.  It  is  supposed  that 
the  repetition  of  this  injury  is  responsible  for  the  dead  tops  common  on  fir  throughout 
a  large  portion  of  the  Rocky  Mountain  and  Sierra  Nevada  regions. 

Dalcerides  ingenita  Hy.  Edw.,  a  species  of  slug  caterpillar,  was  reported  seriously 
defoliating  "live  oak  scrub"  near  Payson,  Ariz.  The  habits  of  this  insect  were  not 
known  previously. 


516  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Insects  Injurious  to  Stored  Products. 

The  Mediterranean  flour  moth  \Eph($tia  kududeUa  Zell.  |,  that  scourge  of  the  flour 
mill,  greatly  increased  its  range,  having  been  reported  from  four  times  as  many  locali- 
ties as  in  any  previous  year.  Its  injuries  were  particularly  noticeable  in  new- 
localities  in  California.  Oregon.  Maryland.  Ohio.  Michigan.  Pennsylvania.  New  York, 
nsin.  and  Illinois.  It  was  doubtfully  reported  from  South  Dakota.  Iowa,  and 
West  Virginia. 

The  European  grain  moth  (Tinea  granella  L.  has  apparently  become  established 
in  thL?  country,  as  considerable  correspondence  was  received  in  regard  to  its  occur- 
rence in  seed  storehouses  and  mills  in  portions  of  Connecticut.  Michigan.  Xew  York, 
and  Canada.     It  bred  in  corn  seed  and  dry  stalks,  and  in  ground  buckwheat. 

The  spider  beetle  '  -  L.  >  caused  serious  damage  to  a  case  of  uniforms  of 

heavy  felted  cloth  in  an  Ohio  locality,  and  was  also  found  in  some  numbers  in  flour 
in  a  flour  mill  at  Ontario.  Canada. 

Hadrobri  rmatus  Say.  another  ptinid  beetle  new  as  a  household  pest,  made 

its  appearance  at  Toledo.  Ohio,  and  Hamburg.  Mich.,  working  somewhat  after  the 
manner  of  the  powder-pnst  beetles  {Lydut  spp.  .  in  white  ash  and  basswood  flooring, 
the  former  wood  being  comparatively  new  and  the  latter  very  old. 

The  cigarette  beetle  yLasioderma  serric  appears  to  be  increasingly  destruc- 

tive year  by  year,  many  complaints  having  been  received  during  1906.  It  affected 
tobacco  of  ail  kinds,  and  its  injuries  were  well  distributed  throughout  the  eastern 
United  States  and  extended  westward  into  Arizona.  It  also  injured  herbarium 
specimens  at  St.  Louis.  Mo.,  and  was  troublesome  in  upholstered  furniture  in  the 
District  of  Columbia.  West  Virginia,  and  New  Jersey. 

Inskctg  and  Ticks  as  Animal  Parasites  and  as  Conveyors  of  Disease. 

The  insect  and  tick  parasites  of  domestic  animals  and  man  vary  but  slightly  as 
regards  abundance  from  year  to  year.  The  following  observations,  however,  on  some 
of  the  ae  pests  are  of  inte: 

The  cattle  tick  (Boop/nhu  amsuioftu  Say  does  not  vary  decidedly  in  numbers 
from  vear  to  vear.     In  1906  the  usual  loss  from  Texas  fever,  'estimated  at  $40,000,000 

-    10,000,000,  may  be  attributed  to  it. 

Trie  lone  star  tick  i  Amblyomma  americanum  L.  ranks  next,  though  its  importance 
is  immeasurably  less  because  it  does  not  transmit  disease.  In  1906  it  was  very  minier- 
ous.  especially  in  regions  where  sheep  and  goats  are  kept. 

The  tropical  horse  tick  I  Dermacentor  nitens  Aud.  was  discovered  in  this  country 
for  the  first  time  by  an  agent  of  the  Bureau  of  Entomology,  and  its  occurrence  over  a 
considerable  area  in  southern  Texas  was  determined. 

The  gulf  coast  tick  Amblyomma  ntaculatum  Koch  .  which  has  previously  attracted 
no  attention,  was  found  very  commonly  along  the  coasts  of  Texas  and"  Louisiana 
infesting  cattle,  horses,  dogs,  and  man. 

The  tropica]  tick  I  Amblyomma  cc  Koch   was  observed  in  Texas  as  far  north 

as  Beeville. 

The  dog  Rhipicephalus  Rhipictphalus  sp.  was  found  commonly  over  a  large  area 
in  southern  Texas.  Its  close  relationship  to  disease-transmitting  species  gives  it 
considerable  inr 

A  fa     -  Tabanus  opacus  Ooq.    caused  much  annoyance  to  horses  and  cattle  in 

Wyoming. 

The  screw  worm    Chrysomyia  macellaria  Fab.  .  always  a  source  of  trouble  in  Texas. 
was  annoying  to  stock.     The  same  is  true  of  the  horse  bot  *Ga$trophilus  equi  F. 
which  was  observed  in  the  same  State  everywhere  as  far  west  as  Ozona. 

Miscellaneous  or  Unclassified  Insect  Pests. 

insects  injurious  in  greenhouses  and  in  flower  gardens. 

The  violet  gall  midge   Contarinia  [I>iplosis]  violicola  Coq.)  has  become  a  very  serious 
pest  in  the  extensive  violet-growing  industry  in  the  Hudson  River  valley  region  of 
Xew  York.     The  rose  leaf-beetle  yXodonota  pinicficollis  Say    was  injurious" to  ruses  in 
the  vicinity  of  the  District  of  Columbia.     The  rose  leaf-hopper  (  Typhlocyba  rosx  B 
was  quite  troublesome  during  the  year  and  caused  considerable  complaint  bear 

rk  on  rose  bushes  in  and  about  the  District  of  Columbia,  as  also  in  Xew  York  State. 
The  red-banded  leaf-hop;  >:phala  eoccinta  Forst.    was  injurious  to  ornamental 

plants  in  Central  Xew  York  and  in  the  District  of  Columbia,  China  aster,  roses,  and 
hibiscus  being  particularly  injured.  Lilac  bushes  at  Stony  Brook.  X.  Y..  were 
reported  badly  damaged  by  a  giant  scarabseid  beetle.  Xylory'cUs  satyr.;.?  Fab.  The 
greenhouse  leaf-tyer  (Phlycixniaferrugalis  Hbn.  |  was  a  pest  in  greenhouses  in  Michigan. 


SOIL    AREAS    SURVEYED    AND    MAPPED. 


517 


STRAWBERRY   INSECTS. 

The  strawberry  crown  girdler  (Otiorhynchus  ovatus  L.)  was  very  destructive  in  King 
County.  Wash. ,  to  strawberry  plants.  An  estimated  loss  of  about  $55,000  was  made  for 
that  county.  It  was  observed  on  ornamental  plants  about  Chicago,  111.  The  straw- 
berry leaf-roller  (Ancylis  comptana  Frohl.)  was  abundant  in  Maryland  and  Virginia 
near  the  District  of  Columbia,  and  was  complained  of  in  Illinois  and  Missouri.  The 
strawberry  sawfly  (Harpiphorus  maculatus  Nort.)  was  injurious  in  Massachusetts. 


MISCELLANEOUS. 

The  Rocky  Mountain  locust  (Melanopliis  spretus  Thos.)  was  very  destructive  in  por- 
tions of  South  Dakota.  One  correspondent  reported  the  total  destruction  of  nursery 
plantings,  the  damage  aggregating  $800. 

A  red  spider  (Tetranychus  sp.)  was  reported  as  causing  much  damage  to  hops  in 
portions  of  the  State  of  Washington,  one  grower  reporting  an  almost  total  loss. 

The  calloused  bill-bug  (Sphenophorus  callosus  01.)  was  destructive  to  chufa,  and 
was  concerned  in  injury  to  timothy  in  Virginia  near  the  District  of  Columbia. 

Of  pests  related  to  insects,  a  sowbug  (Porcellio  Isevis  Latr.)  was  injurious  to  mush- 
rooms grown  commercially  in  the  District  of  Columbia  and  Kansas.  Many  complaints 
were  also  received  of  slugs  and  their  injuries  to  plants  of  various  kinds.  Angleworms 
also  were  present  in  troublesome  numbers  in  gardens,  on  lawns,  on  golf  links,  and  in 
some  cases  in  large  fields. 


AREAS  SURVEYED  AND  MAPPED  BY  THE  BUREAU  OF  SOILS. 

By  A.  G.  Rice,  Chief  Clerk,  Bureau  of  Soils. 

The  following  statement  shows  the  location  and  extent  of  soil  surveys  made  up  to 
December  31,  1906.  The  Bureau  prepares  and  issues  a  lithograph  map,  drawn  on  a 
scale  of  1  mile  to  the  inch,  for  each  area  surveyed,  indicating  in  colors  the  distribution 
of  the  various  soil  types.  The  accompanying  sketch  map  (fig.  20)  gives  the  location 
of  these  areas. 


Fig.  20. — Areas  covered  by  the  Soil  Survey. 

The  statement  gives  a  list  of  the  areas  surveyed  with  the  number  of  square  miles 
in  each,  and  the  total  area  surveyed  in  each  State  and  Territorv.  The  total  for  the 
United  States  is  128,198  square  miles,  or  82,046,720  acres. 


518 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Areas  of  soil  surveys  in  the  United  States  to  December  31,  1906. 


Square 
miles. 
Alabama: 

Blount  County 625 

Dallas  County 992 

Fort  Payne  area 509 

Huntsville  area 506 

Lauderdale  County 708 

Lee  County ." 629 

Macon  County 621 

Mobile  area 461 

Montgomery  County 780 

Perry  County 762 

Sumter  County 893 

Arizona: 

Buckeye  sheet 43 

Phoenix  sheet 243 

Solomonsville  area 108 

Tempe  sheet 163 

Yuma  area 340 


Arkansas: 

Fayetteville  area . 

Miller  County 

Prairie  County... 

Stuttgart  area . . . 


California: 

Bakersfleld  area 

Fresno  area 

Hanford  area 

Imperial  area 

Indio  area 

Los  Angeles  area .... 

Sacramento  area 

Salinas  sheet 

San  Bernardino  area . 

San  Gabriel  area 

San  Jose  area 

Santa  Ana  area 

Solidad  sheet 

Stockton  area 

Ventura  sheet 

Willow  area 


Colorado: 

Arkansas  Valley  area. 
Grand  Junction  area . 

Greeley  area 

San  Luis  area 


569 
026 
656 
251 


195 
628 
216 
,084 
234 
570 
924 
189 
755 
259 
313 
275 
155 
521 
240 
375 


945 
168 
687 
628 


Connecticut : 

Connecticut  Valley. 
Delaware: 

Dover  area 

Florida: 

Escambia  County. . 

Gadsden  County. . . 

Gainesville  area 

Leon  County 


Georgia: 

Bainb ridge  area. 

Cobb  County 

Covington  area. . 
Dodge  Ounty... 
Fort  Valley  area. 
Spalding  County. 
Waycross  area. . . 


Idaho: 

Boise  sheet 

Blackfoot  area. 
Caldwell  sheet . 
Lewiston  area. 


662 
548 
485 
67S 


364 

346 
225 

489 
186 
205 
609 


1"55 
428 
244 
308 


Illinois: 

Clay  County 460 

Clinton  County 491 

Johnson  County 339 

Knox  County 717 

McLean  County 1, 159 

O' Fallon  area 68 

Sangamon  County 866 

St.  Clair  County 650 

Tazewell  County 645 

Winnebago  County 526 


7,486 


Square 
_    ,  miles. 

Indiana: 

Boonville  area 264 

Greene  County 535 

Madison  County 435 

Marshall  County 445 

Newton  County 393 

Posey  County 387 

Scott  County 197 

Tippecanoe  County "  "  "      499 

Indian  Territory: 

Tishomingo  area 


2,102 


6,933 


2,428 
505 


2,370 


2,424 


1,135 


Iowa: 

Cerro  Gordo  County 567 

Dubuque  area 440 

Story  County 576 

Tama  County 720 

Kansas : 

Allen  County 504 

Brown  County 573 

Garden  City  area 335 

Parsons  area 398 

Riley  County 634 

Russell  area 270 

Wichita  area 465 


5,921 


Kentucky: 

McCracken  County 242 

Madison  County 437 

Mason  County *  225 

Scott  County 280 

Union  County 361 

Warren  County 533 

Louisiana: 

Acadia  Parish 636 

Caddo  Parish 898 

De  Soto  Parish 825 

East  Baton  Rouge  Parish 451 

Lake  Charles  area 202 

New  Orleans  area 410 

Ouachita  Parish 605 

Tangipahoa  Parish 788 

Maryland: 

Calvert  County 217 

Cecil  County 376 

Harford  County 418 

Kent  County .  .* 293 

Prince  George  County 480 

St.  Mary  County 363 

Worcester  County 463 


Massachusetts: 

Connecticut  Valley 

Michigan: 

Allegan  County 828 

Alma  area 282 

Cass  County 500 

Munising  area 407 

Oxford  area 210 

O wosso  area 270 

Pontiac  area 307 

Saginaw  area 984 

Minnesota: 

Blue  Earth  County 749 

Carlton  sheet 413 

Crookston  area 779 

Marshall  area 233 

Mississippi: 

Biloxi  area 615 

Cry stalsp rings  area 231 

Jackson  area 737 

Mayersville  sheet 193 

McNeill  area 198 

Montgomery  County 405 

Pontotoc  County . . ". 498 

fimedes  area 463 

Yazoo  sheet 463 


3,155 


3,179 


2,07S 


4,815 


2,610 


809 


3,788 


2,174 


3,803 


SOIL    AEEAS    SURVEYED    AND    MAPPED. 


519 


Areas  of  soil  surveys  in  the  United  States  to  December  31,  1906 — Continued. 


Square 
miles. 

Missouri: 

Crawford  County 747 

Howell  County 919 

O'Fallon  area 552 

Putnam  County 523 

Saline  County 748 

Scotland  County 410 

Shelby  County.". 511 

Webster  County 605 

5,045 

Montana: 

Billings  area 107 

Gallatin  Valley  area 325 

432 

Nebraska : 

Grand  Island  area 440 

Kearney  area 792 

Lancaster  County 857 

Sarpy  County 227 

Stanton  area 323 

2,645 

New  Hampshire: 

Merrimack  County 923 

New  Jersey: 

Salem  area 493 

Trenton  area 810 

1,303 

New  Mexico: 

Carlsbad  sheet 80 

Roswell  sheet 49 

129 

New  York: 

Auburn  area 161 

Bigflats  area 223 

Binghamton  area 229 

Long  Island  area 845 

Lyons  area 515 

Madison  County 649 

Niagara  County 547 

Syracuse  area 416 

Tompkins  County 493 

Vergennes  area . ." 160 

Westfield  area 260 

4, 798 

North  Carolina: 

Alamance  County 365 

Asheville  area 497 

Cary  sheet 63 

Chowan  County 178 

Clayton  sheet 214 

Craven  area 897 

Duplin  County 824 

Hickory  area 98S 

Kinston  sheet 257 

Mount  Mitchell  sheet 197 

Newbern  sheet 46 

New  Hanover  County 192 

Parmele  area 236 

Perquimans    and     Pasquotank 

counties 461 

Princeton  sheet 248 

Saluda  area 190 

Statesv  ille  area 784 

Transylvania  Countv 372 

7, 309 

North  Dakota: 

Cando  area 283 

Carrington  area 720 

Fargo  area 406 

Grand  Forks  area 3R. 

Jamestown  area 496 

Ransom  County 856 

Williston  area 585 

3, 660 

Ohio: 

Ashtabula  area 340 

Cleveland  area 509 

Columbus  area 472 

Coshocton  area 551 

Meigs  County 443 

Montgomery  County 480 

Toledo  area 103 

Westerville  area 476 

Wooster  area 169 

4,143 


Square 
miles. 
Oklahoma: 

Oklahoma  County 720 

Oregon: 

Baker  City  area 158 

Salem  area 284 

442 

Pennsylvania: 

Adams  County 534 

Chester  County 760 

Lancaster  area 269 

Lebanon  area 669 

Lockhaven  area 278 

Montgomery  County . .    496 

3, 006 

Porto  Rico: 

Arecibo  to  Ponce 330 

Rhode  Island. 

State 1, 085 

South  Carolina: 

Abbeville  area 1, 006 

Campobello  area 515 

Charleston  area 352 

Cherokee  County 361 

Darlington  area 599 

Lancaster  County 486 

Orangeburg  area 709 

York  County 669 

4,697 

South  Dakota: 

Brookings  area 484 

Tennessee: 

Clarksville  area 547 

Davidson  County 501 

Grainger  County 307 

Greene ville  area 664 

Henderson  County 499 

Lawrence  County 618 

Madison  County 561 

Pikeville  area 440 

4,137 

Texas: 

Anderson  County 1,069 

Austin  area 705 

Brazoria  area 845 

Henderson  area 581 

.    Houston  County 1, 192 

Jacksonville  area 100 

Lavaca  County 995 

Laredo  area 155 

Lee  County 666 

Luf kin  area 99 

Nacogdoches  area 97 

Paris  area 548 

San  Antonio  area 484 

San  Marcos  area 515 

Vernon  area 277 

Waco  area 495 

Willis  area 215 

Woodville  area 100 

9, 138 

I'tah: 

Bear  River  Valley 334 

Provo  area 3/3 

Salt  Lake  sheet 249 

Sevier  Valley 235 

Weber  County 310 

1,501 

Vermont : 

Vergennes  area 227 

Virginia: 

Albemarle  area 1,110 

Appomattox  County 340 

Bedford  area 632 

Chesterfield  County 478 

Hanover  County 475 

Leesburg  area 419 

Louisa  County 505 

Norfolk  area 303 

Prince  Edward  County. 430 

Yorktown  area 598 

5. 590 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETME^  -Kl<  ULTUEE. 

Areas  of  soU  surreys  in  ■  her  31.  li-                   .ued. 

Square 

mflea  mflea 

^ ■' j.---.z.z~.   .-  i   Wisconsin: 

>---  i  -  ■■-it-'.;- ..  '-..-.--■  .-.t  i:f- 

-.    —-—^r-.  .'  Portage  County 

-  i^jr.i- =:.- -  j_-  R&f.-iae  County 326 

Walla  Walla  area 201  -riorarea 182 

Yakima  sheet 85  Viroquaarea 50* 


i 
West  Yngnria: 

Vt.  ?~~-~  ■'.'■--■—-.?..       ... •■  Lanmiearaa 

Wheeling  ares. 315 


Total. 

PROGRESS    IN  FOOD  AND    DRUG    INSPECTION  AND    CORRELATED 

INVESTIGATIONS. 

By  H.  W.  Wiley.  Chief  of  Burea 

The  passage  of  the  food  and  drugs  act,  June  30,  1906,  a: 
obtain  sach  legislation  for  more  than  a  quarter  of  &  undoubtedly  u 

est  advancement  in  the  field  of  investigations  covered  by  the  work  •  I 
Chemistry  during  1906  and  marks  what  may  almost  be  called  a  reformation  in  many 
industries  connected  with  the  production  of  foods  and  medical  and  pharmaceutical 
preparations.     Much  work  had  been  done  in  the  Bureau  in  the  direction  of  revealing 
the  conditions  that  necessitated  this  L  -  publication  of  analyse- 

purchased  in  the  open  market,  the  disclosure  of  discrepancies  between  the  lal>el 
and  the  product,  the  compilation  of  State  food  and  drug  laws  showing  need  of  uni- 
formity and  the  difficulties  and  injustices  suffered  by  dealer,  consumer,  and  the 
honest  manufacturer  alike  when  interstate  commerce  was  conducted  under  such 
varying  conditions.  Cooperation  with  the  Post-Office  Department  in  excluding 
fraudulent  medicinal  preparations  from  the  mails  had  revealed  an  evident  need  of 
regulation  of  such  preparations  which  were  often  harmful  as  well  as  fraudulent. 

Although  the  law  did  not  become  operative  until  January  1.  -  effect  was 

noticeable  soon  after  the  passage  of  the  act.     The  great  majority  of  manuiac* 
have  shown  that  they  are  anxious  to  comply  with  the  law  and  have  h 
make  the  necessary  changes  in  their  products  and  labels.     It  is  apparent  that  as 
far  as  most  of  the  reputable  manufacturers  and  dealers  are  concerned  the  law  will  be 
largely  self-operative,  and  as  a  rule  the  decisions  of  the  Department  are  ace 
without  protest.     Careful  inspection  will,  of  course,  be  necessarv.  Ik-  rder 

to  protect  these  interests  from  unfair  competition  with  such  dealers  or  manufacturers 
as  might,  by  misbranding  and  otherwise  misrepresenting  their  goods,  undersell  the 
honest  merchant.     To  this  end  a  number  of  laboratorie- 

tion  in  which  this  work  wifl  be  largely  conducted,  are  being  established  in  addition 
to  the  six  laboratories  at  Chicago,  Philadelph:  rk.  Boston.  JXem  -    and 

San  Francisco,  at  which  ports  imported  foods  have  been  inspected  during  the  pa^  I 
years.     The  improvement  in  the  labeling  of  imported  goods,  the  statements  made  as 
to  colors  and  preservatives,  etc..  show  continuing  improvement  under  this  inspe 

The  improvement  to  be  expected  from  the  regulation  of  th  .    ^nd  phar- 

maceutical preparations  is  already  evidenced  by  the  steps  taken  to  produce  pure 
products  and  to  eliminate  misrepresentations  and  false  claims  as  set  forth  in  the  1.. 
Other  progressive  activities  set  in  operation  by  this  law  include  the  attention  being 
given  to  the  establishment  of  much  needed  standards  for  the  various  products  sub- 
ject to  the  act  and  the  work  of  the  council  on  pharmacy  and  chemistry,  in  whk h 
Bureau  has  cooperated,  which  has  called  to  account  many  remedies  which  have  in 
the  past  masqueraded  under  false  colors. 

In  the  same  way  a  vast  amount  of  research  work  has  been  inaugurated  and  - 
phases  of  it  completed  looking  to  the  determination  of  the  effect  of  pr  -  and 

coloring  matters  on  health  and  digestion ;  the  effect  of  cold  storage,  especially  on  : 
birds,  and  eggs;  and  the  bacteriological-chemical  studies  of  milk,  ice  cream,  etc..  for 
the  better  protection  of  public  health  and  the  establishment  of  re. 
lations  governing  such  products.     During  the  past  year  the  study  of  the  er: 
servatives  made  at  the  hygienic  table  of  the  Bureau  has  been  devoted  to  the  special 
investigation  of  certain  points  which  the  previous  work  indicated  as  being  of  special 
significance  or  needing  further  elaboration,  the  same  preservatives  be:  -das 

in  the  more  general  studies,  i.  e..  boric  acid,  sulphurous  acid,  and  sulphites.  The 
physiological  effects  of  formaldehyde,  benzoic  acid,  and  copper  sulphates  have 


ROAD    LAWS    ENACTED    IX    1906.  521 

also  investigated  along  the  lines  followed  in  the  bulletins  on  borax  and  salicylic  acid 
(No.  84.  Parts  I  and  II)  already  issued.  The  results  with  these  additional  preservatives 
are  now  almost  ready  for  publication. 

In  nearly  all  of  the  laboratories  of  the  Bureau  investigations  are  in  progress  which 
bear  upon  the  subject  of  food  and  drug  control,  the  establishment  of  standards,  the 
character  of  goods  on  the  market,  and  methods  for  the  improvement  of  processes  and 
products.     Among  these  may  be  mentioned  the  following: 

An  investigation,  in  the  miscellaneous  laboratory,  of  concentrated  feeding  stuffs  as 
eold  on  the  American  market,  including  the  analysis  of  approximately  400  cattle  foods 
to  determine  their  composition  and  whether  or  not  they  are  adulterated.  Also  the 
study  of  the  composition  of  mineral  waters  in  the  United  States  has  been  continued, 
providing  valuable  data  in  connection  with  the  enforcement  of  the  food  and  drugs 
act  as  affecting  this  class  of  products.  Illustrative  of  the  efforts  made  to  improve  proc- 
esses may  be  mentioned  the  investigation  of  materials  and  methods  used  in  canning 
foods. 

The  most  striking  investigation  looking  to  the  improvement  of  the  quality  of.  raw- 
materials  is  perhaps  the  experiment  made  with  wheat  grown  in  semiarid  regions  and 
under  irrigation,  or  in  localities  having  a  heavy  rainfall.  The  work  at  its  present  stage 
appears  to  indicate  that,  of  all  the  factors  influencing  the  composition  of  wheat,  water 
plays  a  predominant  part,  the  wheats  grown  under  semiarid  conditions  being  much 
higher  in  nitrogen.  Both  pot  experiments  and  field  work  have  pointed  toward  the 
same  conclusion,  i.  e.,  an  excess  of  water  is  accompanied  by  a  decrease  in  nitrogen  con- 
tent, which  opens  up  the  possibility  of  determining  the  amount  of  irrigation  which 
should  b«  practiced  to  produce  a  crop  of  wheat  containing  the  maximum  nitrogenous 
content  and  making  the  largest  yield. 

In  thus  outlining  the  progress  made  along  a  few  of  the  lines  of  activity  opened  up  or 
made  more  vital  by  the  demands  of  the  new  law.  it  is  important  to  emphasize  the  fact 
that  their  complete  and  satisfactory  accomplishment  can  only  be  effected  by  conserva- 
tive methods;  but  the  effect  of  the  institution  of  such  work  and  the  enactment  of  such  a 
law  has  been  far-reaching  in  its  practical  and  beneficial  effects  even  in  its  initial 
stages — beneficial  alike  to  consumer,  producer,  and  our  commercial  status  as  a  Nation. 

REVIEW  OF  ROAD  LAWS  ENACTED  IN   1906. 

By  M.  O.  Eldridge,  Chief  of  Records,  Oftice  of  Public  Road*. 

The  legislatures  of  only  about  one-fourth  of  the  States  were  in  session  during  the 
year  1906.     Notwithstanding  this  fact,  some  very  important  road  laws  were  enacted. 

The  legislatures  of  twelve  States  adopted  81  bills  relating  to  road  improvement  and 
administration.  A  brief  synopsis  of  the  most  important  of  these  measures  is  pre- 
sented herewith. 

Iowa. — An  act  approved  February  14,  1906.  authorizes  the  use  of  the  split-log  drag 
in  maintaining  earth  roads.  Dragging  must  be  done  under  the  direction  of  the  road 
superintendents,  who  may  allow  not  to  exceed  50  cents  per  mile  for  each  dragging  or 
$5  per  mile  for  dragging  the  road  for  one  year. 

Another  act,  approved  March  10.  1906.  provides  that  all  persons  who  use  wagons  on 
public  roads  with  tires  not  less  than  3  inches  in  width  for  hauling  loads  exceeding  800 
pounds  in  weight  shall  receive  a  rebate  of  one-fourth  of  their  highway  tax.  provided 
such  rebate  shall  not  exceed  $5  per  annum. 

Kentucky. — Any  county  in  this  State  owning  turnpike  roads  is  authorized  by  an 
act  approved  March  21,  1906.  to  collect  tolls  on  such  roads,  provided  the  same  is  agreed 
to  by  a  majority  of  the  legal  voters  of  the  county.  The  fiscal  courts  are  required  to 
appropriate  to  each  road  on  which  tolls  are  collected  all  the  money  so  collected  for  the 
purpose  of  keeping  the  road  in  repair.  Where  the  capital  stock  of  turnpike  roads  is 
owned  by  the  commonwealth  of  Kentucky  and  any  county  or  counties,  the  share 
owned  by  the  State  may  be  transferred  to  the  county,  according  to  an  act  approved 
March  17,  1906.  provided  the  county  agrees  to  maintain  the  road  and  to  collect  no 
tolls  thereon. 

If  agreed  to  by  a  two-thirds  vote  of  the  people,  a  special  tax  of  not  to  exceed  25  cents 
fin  each  $100  worth  of  assessed  property  may  be  levied  for  the  construction  and  repair 
of  roads  in  the  various  counties  of  this  State,  according  to  an  act  approved  March  21. 
1906.  In  working  out  this  tax  the  road  overseer  may  allow  $1  for  each  day's  work 
and  $2.50  per  day  for  each  two-horse  team  and  wagon. 

New  Jersey. — The  salary  of  the  State  commissioner  of  public  roads  is  increased 
by  an  act  approved  April  2,*1906,  from  $1,500  to  $5,000  per  annum:  the  allowance  for 


522  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

hi?  expenses  is  also  increased  from  $1,500  to  $4,000  per  annum,  and  the  salary  of  the 
State  supervisor,  who  shall  be  a  competent  civil  engineer,  is  fixed  at  $2,500  per  "annum. 

According  to  a  law  approved  June  26. 1906.  roads  constructed  by  the  boards  of  chosen 
freeholders  of  the  counties,  with  or  without  State  aid.  may  be  maintained  bv  the 
township,  town,  or  borough  in  which  they  are  located,  under  the  direction  of  the  State 
commissioner  of  public  roads. 

Another  law  provides  that  the  purchase  or  condemnation  of  toll  roads  which  have 
been  permanently  improved  with  stone  or  gravel  may  be  paid  for,  one-third  by  the 
State  and  two-thirds  by  the  county.  Ten  per  cent  of  the  two-thirds  may  be  paid  by 
the  township  or  municipality  in  which  the  road  is  located.  The  county  mav  borrow 
money  temporarily  to  pay  its  share  for  such  roads. 

Xew  York. — The  issuance  of  $50,000,000  in  bonds,  provided  for  in  section  12. 
article  7.  of  the  constitution,  was  legalized  May  16.  1906.  Funds  realized  from  the 
sale  of  those  bonds  are  to  be  expended  under  the  Higbie- Armstrong  State  aid  law 
.  in  the  permanent  improvement  of  the  public  highways,  the  State  paying  one-half  of 
the  cost,  the  counties  35  per  cent,  and  the  townships  or  property  owners  15  per  cent. 
The  bonds  are  to  be  issued  in  two  classes,  A  and  B.  Class  A  bonds  are  to  run  for  a 
period  of  50  years  and  bear  interest  at  3i  per  cent  and  be  redeemable  from  a  fund 
maintained  by  the  State.  An  annual  tax  of  0.0055  mill  upon  each  $1  worth  of  property 
for  every  million  dollars  worth  of  bonds  outstanding  is  provided  to  pay  the  interest 
and  to  create  a  sinking  fund  with  which  to  redeem  Class  A  bonds.  Class  B  bonds 
also  bear  interest  at  the  rate  of  3h  per  cent  and  are  to  be  paid  in  50  equal  annual 
installments  by  the  county  and  townships  wherein  the  proceeds  have  been  applied 
to  the  improvement  of  highways.  The  counties  and  towns  which  do  not  desire  to 
avail  themselves  of  funds  derived  from  the  sale  of  these  bonds  may  pay  their  share  of 
the  cost  of  State  aid  roads  in  cash.  Interest  and  principal  on  Class  B  bonds  are  paid 
by  a  tax  which  is  levied  on  a  basis  of  70  per  cent  upon  the  county  and  30  per  cent 
upon  the  township.  The  sum  of  $5,000,000  was  appropriated  for  1906  out  of  moneys 
realized  from  the  sale  of  these  bonds  for  the  purpose  of  improving  the  highways  accord- 
ing to  the  State  aid  laws. 

The  town  law  relating  to  highway  commissioners  is  amended  according  to  an  act 
approved  May  10.  1906,  so  as  to  provide  that  towns  which  have  adopted  the  money 
system  and  have  more  than  one  highway  commissioner,  may  reduce  the  number  <:'f 
commissioners  to  one.  if  agreed  to  by  a  majority  of  the  voters  at  a  special  meeting. 

The  highway  law  was  amended  May  10.  1906.  so  as  to  provide  that  supervisors  and 
the  highway  commissioner  or  commissioners  of  towns  receiving  State  aid  shall  annu- 
ally report  to  the  State  engineer,  on  forms  provided  for  the  purpose,  all  expenditures 
for  road  and  bridge  purposes,  sources  of  revenue,  machinery  and  tools  on  hand.  The 
highway  commissioners  and  supervisors  are  required  to  use,  for  keeping  accounts  of 
moneys  collected  and  expended,  such  forms  as  may  be  prescribed  by  the  State 
engineer. 

Ohio. — The  county  commissioners  are  authorized  by  law.  approved  March  3.  1906, 
to  issue  bonds  for  the  purpose  of  reimbursing  boards  of  road  commissioners  appointed 
by  the  county  commissioners  for  indebtedness  in  connection  with  road  improvements 
carried  on  by  virtue  of  any  legislative  act.  Such  bonds  may  be  issued  for  such  amounts 
and  such  length  of  time  and  for  such  rate  of  interest  as  the  county  commissioners  may 
determine.  The  commissioners  are  authorized  to  levy  an  annual  tax  on  all  property 
within  the  precinct  or  road  district  out  of  which  to  pay  interest  and  principal. 

Revised  Statutes  of  Ohio  in  relation  to  the  National  Road  were  amended  March  29. 
1906,  so  as  to  provide  that  the  county  commissioners  in  any  county  through  which  the 
National  Road  (Old  Cumberland  Road)  passes  are  authorized  to  require  township 
trustees  to  maintain  portions  of  the  road  which  pass  through  their  township. 

Rhode  Island. — An  act  passed  February'  20,  1906,  provides  for  the  issuance  of 
scrip  or  certificates  of  indebtedness  in  the  name  of  the  State  to  the  amount  of  $600,000. 
They  are  to  mature  in  at  least  thirty  years  and  bear  interest  at  the  rate  of  not  to  exceed 
3  per  cent.  Of  these  bonds.  $200,000  are  to  be  issued  and  sold  before  January  1.  1907, 
and  the  balance  on  or  before  January  1.  1908.  in  such  installments  as  the  State  treas- 
urer may  determine.  The  amount  necessary  to  pay  the  annual  interest  and  provide 
for  a  sinking  fund  to  pay  off  the  bonds  is  to  be  included  in  the  annual  appropriation 
bill  for  State  expenses.  The  funds  derived  from  the  sale  of  these  bonds  are  to  be 
expended  under  the  direction  of  the  State  lx>ard  of  public  roads  in  the  construction 
of  a  system  of  State  roads,  the  State  paying  the  whole  cost,  as  provided  by  law. 

Yirglxia. — On  March  6.  1906,  a  law  was  approved  which  provided  for  the  estah- 
lishment  of  a  State  highway  commission,  consisting  of  a  State  hiehway  commissioner, 
appointed  by  the  governor,  who  shall  be  a  civil  engineer  and  a  citizen  of  the  State, 


EOAD    LAWS    EXACTED    TX    1906.  523 

and  the  professors  of  civil  engineering  of  the  University  of  Virginia,  the  Virginia  Mil- 
itary Institute,  and  the  Virginia  Agricultural  and  Mechanical  College.  The  highway 
commissioner  is  to  receive  a  salary  of  $3,000  per  annum  and  traveling  expenses,  and 
an  assistant  to  the  commissioner  is  to  receive  $1,800  per  annum  and  traveling  expenses. 
Clerks  and  other  assistants  are  also  provided  for.  The  sum  of  $16,000  was  appropriated 
for  the  use  of  the  commission  from  July  1.  1906,  to  February  28,  1908.  The  commis- 
sion is  to  collect  and  disseminate  useful  information  on  road  building,  to  prepare  plans 
and  specifications  for  the  improvement  of  roads  throughout  the  State  when  requested 
by  local  authorities  to  do  so,  and  to  direct  the  construction  of  such  roads. 

The  commission  is  further  authorized  to  furnish  as  many  convicts  from  the  State 
prison  as  may  be  necessary  to  build  the  roads  according  to  the  specifications  of  the 
commissioner  and  under  the  direction  of  an  engineer  appointed  by  him,  provided  the 
local  authorities  agree  to  furnish  all  necessary  material,  tools,  and  teams.  The  State 
highway  commissioner  is  authorized  to  have  general  supervision  of  the  construction 
and  repair  of  the  main  traveled  roads  throughout  the  State  and  to  recommend  to  local 
authorities  and  to  the  governor  needed  improvements  in  the  public  roads.  The  pro- 
fessors of  civil  engineering  at  the  universities  and  colleges  mentioned  are  required  to 
aid  the  commissioner  when  not  actually  engaged  in  their  academic  work  by  inspecting 
road  work  and  giving  such  information  as  may  be  desired. 

Another  act,  approved  March  6.  1906,  provides  for  the  use  of  State  convicts  in  the 
improvement  of  public  roads  and  in  the  preparation  of  road-building  material  through- 
out the  State.  Such  convicts  when  engaged  in  this  work  in  any  county  are  placed 
under  the  direction  of  a  civil  engineer  and  road  builder  appointed  for  the  purpose  by 
the  State  highway  commissioner.  The  sum  of  $25,000  is  appropriated  annually  out 
of  which  to  pay  the  transportation  of  the  convicts  to  and  from  the  penitentiary  and  for 
guarding,  clothing,  and  feeding  them  when  engaged  in  this  work. 

The  law  relating  to  the  establishment,  construction,  and  permanent  improvement 
of  public  roads  was  amended  March  17.  1906.  providing  among  other  things  that  the 
county  superintendents  of  roads,  road  district  boards,  road  subdistrict  supervisors,  and 
the  State  engineer  shall  have  control,  supervision,  and  management  of  the  public 
ruads.  The  bill  also  provides  that  the  regular  county  levy  and  district  levy  may  be 
used  in  defraying  the  county's  and  district's  proportion  of  the  expense  of  constructing 
roads  for  which  State  aid  has  been  obtained.  Rules  and  plans  for  making  roads  in  the 
counties  are  subject  to  the  approval  of  the  State  highway  commissioner. 

The  boards  of  supervisors  of  the  various  counties,  according  to  an  act  approved 
March  14.  1906.  are  authorized  to  enact  such  local  legislation  as  may  be  necessary  for 
the  protection  of  roads  and  bridges. 

According  to  an  act  approved  March  8.  1906,  bonds  may  be  issued  by  any  county  for 
the  purpose  of  permanently  improving  roads  and  bridges,  provided  the  same  is  agreed 
to  by  a  majority  of  the  qualified  voters  of  the  county.  The  maximum  amount  of  such 
bond  issue  shall  not  exceed  10  per  cent  of  the  total  taxable  valuation,  and  the  bonds 
shall  be  payable  in  not  to  exceed  thirty-four  years.  A  tax  of  not  to  exceed  90  cents  on 
each  $100  worth  of  property  must  be  levied  to  create  a  sinking  fund  and  to  pay  the 
interest  thereon.  All  roads  built  from  such  bond  issues  must  be  constructed  according 
to  the  directions  of  the  State  highway  commissioner. 

Counties  in  which  no  special  road  law  is  in  force  may  be  divided  by  the  board  of 
supervisors  into  road  subdistricts.  The  qualified  voters  of  such  subdistricts  are  author- 
ized to  meet  and  elect  a  chairman,  secretary,  treasurer,  and  one  or  more  road  surveyors 
and  to  assess  a  subdistrict  road  tax  of  not  to  exceed  50  cents  on  each  $100  of  taxable 
valuation.  These  funds  are  to  be  expended  under  the  direction  of  the  road  surveyor 
of  the  subdistrict  and  according  to  such  instructions  as  he  may  receive  from  the  State 
highway  commissioners,  the  county  supervisors,  or  the  subdistrict  meetings.  The 
surveyor  is  also  required  to  furnish  such  information  to  these  authorities  as  may  be 
requested  from  time  to  time.  The  State  highway  commissioner  is  required  to  furnish 
plans  of  split-log  and  other  drags  to  supervisors  of  subdistricts  and  to  instruct  them  in 
their  proper  use. 

An  act  relating  to  turnpike  companies  was  so  amended,  March  17,  1906,  as  to  provide 
that  when  the  collection  of  tolls  on  turnpikes  has  been  suspended  for  a  period  of  four 
months  on  account  of  the  bad  condition  of  the  same,  three  disinterested  supervisors 
shall  be  appointed  by  the  circuit  court  to  make  an  examination  of  the  road,  and  if  it  is 
reported  by  them  to  be  in  bad  condition  the  circuit  court  is  authorized  to  require  the 
turnpike  company  to  forfeit  its  franchise  and  charter. 

Chapter  43  of  the  code  of  Virginia  was  so  amended  on  March  19,  1906,  as  to  provide 
that  taxes  levied  for  road  purposes  by  the  boards  of  county  supervisors  shall  not  be 
levied  on  property  located  in  incorporated  cities  and  towns  which  maintain  their  own 
streets. 


524  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


PROGRESS  IN  FARM  MANAGEMENT  IN  1906. 

By  W.  J.   Sfillman.   Agriculturist   in    Charge  of  Farm    Management   Investigations, 

Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

Progress  in  the  development" and  extension  of  agricultural  industries  and  efforts 
looking  toward  the  adoption  of  improved  methods  of  farming  have  been  hampered  in 
all  sections  of  the  United  States  during  the  past  year  by  a  lack  of  farm  labor.  The 
amazing  development  of  transportation  and  manufacturing  industries  has  absorbed 
the  available  labor,  and  the  farmer  has  been  compelled  to  operate  with  an  insufficient 
supply.  Especially  in  Xew  England  and  in  the  Southern  States  the  labor  is  drifting 
toward  the  cities.  The  State  of  South  Carolina  has  been  making  efforts  to  remedy  this 
difficulty  by  securing  immigration.  The  State  of  Maryland  is  taking  steps  in  the  same 
direction.  Modification  of  our  immigration  laws  has  been  suggested  as  a  means  of 
ameliorating  this  condition.  It  is  believed  that  the  present  interest  in  agricultural 
education  will  lead  to  the  development  of  schools  of  a  type  that  will  open  the  door  of 
opportunity  on  the  farm,  and  thus  hold  a  larger  proportion  of  the  rural  population,  to 
some  extent  remedying  the  difficulty. 

Because  of  insufficient  labor  many  farmers  have  been  compelled  to  abandon  types  of 
farming  which  require  much  labor  and  to  seed  much  of  their  land  to  grass,  thus 
reducing  the  amount  of  labor  needed,  but  at  the  same  time  reducing  the  income  from 
the  land. 

One  of  the  most  notable  movements  in  connection  with  progress  in  farm  management 
during  the  past  year  has  been  the  tendency  toward  diversified  farming  in  the  cotton 
belt.  The  primary  factor  in  this  movement  is  the  injury  done  to  the  cotton  crop  by  the 
boll  weevil.  Diversified  farming  in  that  section  is  taking  the  direction  of  an  increase 
in  trucking  and  fruit  growing,  dairying,  hay  production,  the  raising  of  hogs,  and  to 
some  extent  the  production  of  beef.  The  development  of  trucking  and  fruit  interests 
has  been  greatly  hampered  because  of  difficulties  connected  with  the  marketing  of 
perishable  farm  products.  On  account  of  the  absence  of  statistics  relating  to  acreages 
of  such  crops  the  farmer  has  no  idea  of  the  acreage  of  any  particular  crop  it  is  safe  for 
him  to  plant.  Because  of  lack  of  organization  for  marketing  such  products,  he  does  not 
know  where  to  send  his  material  when  it  is  ready  for  market.  The  further  fact  that 
the  producer  has  no  adequate  protection  against  unfair  treatment  from  consignees 
has  discouraged  many  farmers  from  engaging  in  trucking.  In  some  sections  icing 
charges  and  high  freight  rates  leave  no  profit  to  the  producer.  If  these  difficulties 
could  be  remedied  there  would  undoubtedly  be  an  enormous  increase  in  truck  farming 
throughout  the  South. 

The  present  effort  to  eradicate  the  cattle  tick  in  the  South  causes  renewed  interest  in 
all  types  of  cattle  fanning.  If  the  effort  is  successful,  it  will  undoubtedly  result  in  a 
large  extension  of  cattle  raising  just  at  a  time  when  range  cattle  in  the  West  are  decreas- 
ing rapidly,  because  of  the  occupation  of  range  land  by  settlers  on  the  one  hand  and 
the  extension  of  sheep  grazing  on  the  other.  The  elimination  of  the  cattle  tick  would 
also  doubtless  cause  a  large  increase  in  the  dairy  industry  in  the  South. 

The  increased  price  of  wool  for  the  past  few  years  has  caused  renewed  interest  in 
sheep  raising  in  all  sections  of  the  country,  and  the  number  of  sheep  on  American 
farms  is  increasing. 

There  are  still  some  sections  of  the  country  which  have  not  yet  been  farmed  suffi- 
ciently long  to  deplete  the  original  fertility  of  the  soils,  and  in  these  sections  single-crop 
systems  of  farming,  especially  grain  farming,  prevail  very  generally.  In  at  least  one 
notable  instance  this  type  of  farming  has  been  continued  too  long  and  has  resulted  in 
marked  deterioration  of  the  soil.  Just  at  the  present  time  the  owners  of  the  vast 
wheat  fields  in  the  Sacramento  Valley  are  seriously  considering  a  change  in  their 
system  of  farming  with  a  view  to  building  up  the  fertility  of  the  soil.  In  the  Plains 
region  the  change  to  a  more  diversified  system  of  farming  has  made  more  progress, 
and  where  formerly  corn  and  wheat  were  practically  the  only  crops,  alfalfa,  sorghum, 
Kafir  corn,  and  other  forage  crops  are  becoming  more  important,  and  the  amount  of 
live  stock  on  the  farms  is  increasing.  In  the  Dakotas.  where  grain  farming  has  been 
the  rule,  much  interest  is  manifested  in  dairying,  and  that  industry  is  beginning  to 
show  very  satisfactory  development  in  that  section. 

The  recent  demonstration  of  a  cheap  and  effective  method  of  eradicating  Johnson 
grass  will  doubtless  render  it  possible  for  that  valuable  hay  grass  to  be  utilized  in  crop 
rotations  in  the  South  somewhat  as  timothy  is  now  utilized  in  the  North.  Taken  in 
connection  with  the  eradication  of  the  cattle  tick,  which  is  now  in  progress,  this  fact 
can  not  fail  to  have  an  important  influence  on  the  development  of  live-stock  farming 
in  the  cotton  belt. 


PROGRESS    OF    FORESTRY    IN    1906. 


525 


Alfalfa  continues  to  occupy  an  important  place  among  those  crops  which  are  increas- 
ing in  area  on  farms  in  the  eastern  half  of  the  United  States.  Its  successful  culture  is 
having  an  important  influence  in  modifying  cropping  systems  and  types  of  farming, 
and  where  it  has  become  established  it  has  considerably  increased  the  income  from  the 
land. 

PROGRESS  OF  FORESTRY  IN  1906. 

By  Quincy  R.  Craft,  Forest  Service. 

The  fuller  utilization  of  forest  products  which  characterized  the  operations  of  lum- 
bermen in  1906  marked  the  greatest  gain  of  the  year  in  private  forestry.  In  the 
work  of  the  National  Government  and  the  States  remarkable  advance  was  made  in 
the  creation,  protection,  and  use  of  public  forests.  Eminent  success  in  systematic 
effort  to  prevent  damage  by  fire  was  attained  by  private  owners,  the  States,  and  the 
Federal  Service. 

That  forest  preservation  has  come  to  be  regarded  as  a  matter  of  deep  concern  to  every 
citizen  is  manifest.  News  of  improved  methods  and  their  results  is  published  widely 
by  the  press,  and  commented  on  in  wise  and  vigorous  editorials.  The  reprinting  of 
forest  reports  entire  by  the  trade  journals  is  now  common.  In  16  States  30  forest  asso- 
ciations are  engaged  in  active  propaganda,  and  the  General  Federation  of  Women's 
Clubs  is  advancing  forestry  locally  and  giving  it  prominence  at  State  and  National 
meetings. 

Private  forestry  has  grown  until  not  only  are  professional  foresters  employed  regu- 
larly by  a  number  of  the  larger  firms,  but  firms  of  consulting  and  contracting  foresters 
supervise  cutting  operations  and  guarantee  to  the  owners  renewal  of  the  trees  desired 
in  the  forest.  Large  users  of  forest  products  tend  more  and  more  to  apply  sound 
methods  to  the  raising  of  wood  crops  and  to  their  careful  utilization. 


BUSINESS    FORESTRY   IN    THE    ADMINISTRATION    OF   THE    NATIONAL   FORESTS. 

Within  three  decades  after  the  first  Federal  recognition  of  forestry,  and  sixteen  years 
from  the  date  when  the  first  "timberland  reserve"  was  created,  there  have  been  estab- 
lished (May  1,  1907),  in  the  interest  of  the  whole  people,  150  million  acres  of  National 
Forests,  effectively  protected  against  fire  and  trespass,  and  thrown  open  on  advan- 
tageous terms  to  the  use  of  the  public.  Forests  have  so  large  a  place  in  the  national 
life  that  in  some  measure  every  citizen  shares  the  benefits  which  attend  successful 
effort  to  preserve,  restore,  or  establish  them.  Yet  it  will  always  be  the  Western  indus- 
tries which  will  most  profit  from  the  presence  of  the  existing  National  Forests,  upon 
whose  resources — mainly  wood,  water,  and  range — they  are  largely  dependent.  The 
Government  always  favors  settlers  and  home  builders  and  prior  users,  both  by  grant- 
ing free  use  of  timber  and  by  encouraging  small  sales.  The  business  of  the  National 
Forests  must  increase  largely;  for  so  vast  are  the  resources  of  timber  and  minerals,  and 
the  opportunities  for  various  business  enterprises  and  for  the  development  of  power 
and  irrigation,  that  the  utilization  of  the  Forests  can  be  said  to  have  only  fairly  begun. 

Throughout  the  year  marked  progress  has  been  made  in  securing  the  most  prompt, 
simple,  and  precise  business  methods,  and  in  bringing  the  forest  officers  in  the  field 
and,  through  them,  the  public  into  closer  touch  with  the  aims  of  the  Government  in 
its  forest  policy.  On  January  1,  1906,  the  area  of  the  National  Forests  was  97,773,617 
acres,  and  on  December  31,  1906,  127,154,371  acres;  but  the  receipts  increased  in 
greater  proportion— from  $273,660  in  1905  to  $1,004,185  in  1906.  In  addition,  15,000 
permittees  (near-by  settlers  and  ranchmen)  were  granted  timber  free  of  charge  to  the 
value  of  $75,000.  The  progress  of  National  Forest  administration  in  business  matters 
is  indicated  by  the  following  table-. 

The  results  of  business  forestry . 


Fiscal  year  (July  1  to 
June  30). 

Area  of  Na- 
tional 
Forests, 
June  30, 1906. 

Total  gross 
revenue. 

Total  ex- 
penditure. 

Deficit. 

Expend- 
iture per 
acre. 

Deficit 
per  acre. 

1901-2 

A  ares. 
59,966,090 
62, 962, 849 
63,027,884 
85,693,422 
100, 999, 138 

$25, 431.  87 
45, 838.  08 
58, 436.  19 
73,276.15 

767, 219.  00 

$325, 000.  00 
300, 013.  50 
379, 150.  40 
508, 886.  00 
979,519.00 

$299, 568.  13 
254, 175.  42 
320, 714. 21 
435, 609.  85 
212, 300. 00 

$0.  00.34 
.0048 
.0060 
.0059 
.0091 

$0.  0050 

1902-3 

.0040 

1903-4 

0051 

1904-5 

.0050 

1905-6 

.0020 

526  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

In  disposing  of  timber  on  the  National  Forests,  even*  effort  has  been  made  to  meet 
the  local  conditions  in  each  Forest  and  in  the  different  parts  of  each  Forest  where  the 
character  of  the  timber  and  the  market  require  special  consideration.  This  has  been 
done  not  only  by  varying  the  size  of  the  trees  which  are  cut  under  the  sales  in  accord- 
ance with  the  kind  of  timber  and  the  situation,  but  also  by  supplying  the  needs  of  the 
people  in  each  vicinity  with  the  particular  kind  of  timber  required  by  them  in  their 
industries. 

The  institution  of  a  charge  for  grazing  in  the  Forests,  with  the  adoption  of  regula- 
tions to  prevent  damage  to  the  range,  and  with  satisfactory  allotments  of  territory, 
both  between  the  cattle  owners  and  sheep  owners  and  between  individual  owr. 
the  same  kind  of  stock,  were  important  accomplishments  of  the  year. 

Planting  operations  are  at  present  centered  in  S  nurseries  within  or  near  a*  many 
different  forests.  There  are  now  on  hand  a  total  of  6.000.000  seedlings,  and  750  . 
will  be  planted  in  the  spring  of  1907.  Four  of  the  nurseries  have  been  established  long 
enough  to  grow  seedlings  of  size  for  planting.  Three,  those  at  Fort  Stanton  and  near 
Las  Vegas.  X.  Mex..  and  near  Pocatello.  Idaho,  have  recently  been  established.  In 
addition  to  these  many  small  nurseries  have  been  placed  at  rangers"  headquarters. 
some  of  which  will  be  enlarged  into  planting  stations. 

Better  facilities  for  communication,  through  public  and  private  telephone  lines  now 
being  constructed  and  the  improvemen:  :he  greatest  assistance  in 

the  conduct  of  forest  business,  and  especially  in  the  control  of  tires.     The  use  of  the 
forests  by  the  public  will  also  be  stimulated  by  the  marking  of  roads  and  trails,  g 
the  direction  and  distance  to  the  nearest  I  irn,  ranch,  or  camping  ph. 

The  record  of  1906  has  continued  the  business  success  of  the  Government  policy,  and 
thus  given  encouragement  to  the  development  of  the  technical  sidr  When. 

through  studies  now  under  way.  a  better  knowledge  of  the  growth  and  habits  of  our 
western  trees  is  secured  and  the  forests  have  been  brought,  through  the  utilization  of 
ground  at  present  unoccupied,  to  greatly  increased  product iveness.  still  larger  benefits 
may  be  expected. 

MOVEMENT    WESTWARD    AXP    SOUTHWARD    OF   THE    LUMBER    IXPI "- 

Where  lumbering  methods  remove  only  mature  trees  or  an  annual  cut  equal  to  the 
aggregate  growth  of  the  forest  tributary  to  the  mill,  forest  products,  like  field  crops. 
must  increase  as  operations  extend.  The  din  of  the  lumber  camp  and  the  mill .  and  the 
whistle  of  the  locomotive  and  steamboat  hurrying  their  product  to  market,  will  then 
announce  not  the  passing  of  the  forest  but  its  pre  n  through  use.     When,  on  the 

other  hand,  lands  are  denuded  and  left  waste,  deeper  penetration  into  the  woods  with 
the  enlarged  capacity  which  comes  of  skill  and  invention  can  only  hasten  the  exhaus- 
tion of  supply. 

Too  much  wasteful  exploitation  has  made  heavy  inroads  in  the  forest  which  once 
lied  almost  unbroken  from  the  Atlantic  to  the  prairies.    In  obedience  to  the  law 
of  supply  and  demand,  lumber  prices  have  gradually  advanced  in  the  past  twenty 
years,  in  some  a  much  as  10S  per  cent.     Yet  these  advances  have  not 

kept  pace  with  those  of  stumpage  values,  and  do  not.  therefore,  fully  reveal  the 
changed  condition  in  the  timber  supply.  These  changes  show  conclusively  that  it  is 
high  time  for  the  introduction  of  conservativ  .ethods  in  the  management  of 

"ands  everywhere.     There  are  now  a  million  acres  of  private  woodland  on  which 
f orestry  is  being  applied  under  plan*  prepared  during  the  past  four  years  by  the  F 
Service:  but  this  is  only  a  beginning.     The   scope  of  this  management  must  be 
increased  many  fold. 

To  supplement  and  complete  the  statistics  of  forest  products  there  is  great  need  for 
accurate  knowledge  of  the  standing  timber  in  the  country  and  its  stumpage  value.  S 
and  species  are  now  used  which  formerly  were  left  as  unmerchantable,  so  that  all  former 
estimates  are  out  of  date.  Any  future  estimate  of  timber  should  leave  out  of  consid- 
eration the  present  merchantable  value  of  timber,  and  should  aim  to  show  the  actual 
stand  of  timber  regardles-  ecies.  or  quality.     The  inadequacy  of  former  esti- 

mates is  shown  by  a  single  instance  in  which  the  coniferous  cut  since  1S80  has 
exceeded  by  80  billion  feet  the  total  estimated  stumpage  of  those  woods  at  that  time. 
And  this  is  not  only  because  of  the  scarcity  of  better  grades  and  larger  sizes,  but  also 
because  of  the  improvement  ...rgely  brought  about  through  the 

application  of  forestry. 

PRIVATE    FOREST    LAXDS    THE    MATS"    SOURCE    OF    SUPPLY. 

The  Nation  can  and  should  maintain  forests  in  isolated  and  mountainous  regions 
where  their  principal  value  is  for  the  protection  of  watersheds,  the  sources 
and  the  many  industries  dependent  upon  an  equable  supply  of  water  and  a  sufficient 
-        But  on  private  lands  the  practice  of  forestry  can  be  expected  only  where  it 


PROGRESS    OF    FORESTRY    IN    1906. 


527 


92.00 


insures  profit  in  perpetuating  a  source  of  timber  supply.   .  Since  four-fifths  of  the  for- 
ests of  the  country,  and.  in  general,  those  most  productive  and  accessible,  are  in  the 
hands  of  private  own- 
ers, the   future  timber  1894  1895   1896  IS97  1898  I&99  I900  1901    1902.  1905  1904  1905  1906 

supply  rests  chiefly 
with  them.  Timber- 
land  owners  are  realiz- 
ing this  fact.  In  the 
eastern  part  of  the 
country  forests  under 
management  are  now 
so  numerous  that  some 
one  of  them  can  be 
visited  for  inspection 
by  a  few  hours  of  rail- 
way travel.  On  the 
Pacific  coast  the  neces- 
sity of  protection  from 
fire  is  especially  felt; 
and  a  lumber  company 
in  northern  California 
is  successfully  carry- 
ing out  a  plan  for  fire 
protection  on  a  tract 
of  70.000  acres  and  at 
a  nominal  cost. 

At  no  previous  time 
have  the  prospects  for 
success  in  private  for- 
estry been  so  good. 
Depleted  supply  en- 
courages conservative 
use,  and  increased 
knowledge  of  the  less 
familiar  forest  trees, 
of  improved  methods 
of  management,  of  sea- 
soning and  kiln-drying 
methods,  and  of  mar- 
kets, enables  the  lum- 
berman or  landowner 
to  lay  his  plans  with  a 
confidence  hitherto 
impossible. 

More  and  more  is 
the  entire  tree  being 
utilized,  by  cutting 
the  trunk  nearer  the 
ground  and  higher  into 
the  crown ;  by  the  use 
of  modern  equipment 
which  secures  the  min- 
imum of  waste  at  the 
mill;  and,  in  the  hard- 
wood regions,  by  the 
construction  of  char- 
coal blast  furnaces  and 
chemical  plants  to  uti- 
lize the  bark,  limbs, 
edgings,  slabs,  and 
even  the  sawdust  in 
the  manufacture  of 
charcoal,  wood  alco- 
hol ,  and  acetate  of  lime. 


90 


85 


80 


75 


70 


65 


(0  55 

< 

J 
J  50 

O 
0  47 

'45 

hi 
O 

a. 

a.  40 


16. 50 
15 


11.50 
IO 


,--" 

J 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

f 

WH 

TE 

PINE 

F 

OUGI 

1     UF 

per: 

WHO 

LE5A 

l_E    P 

RICE 

BU 

^FAL 

-O,   r- 

.Y. 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

{ 

Y 

ELLC 

Wv  P 

OPL/ 

kP, 

I'Xf 

V  AN 

D  u 

>.  12' 

-16' 

IST/ 

AMD 

2D  = 

FO. 

3.  NE 

*W   > 

'ORK 

ren- 

TONS 

rvooi 

>       / 

ts 

r  an 

D  2D. 

t  / 

/IX 

S'Ar 

UDUP 

'C-I6 

/F.a 

J.  NE 

W  Y 

DRK/ 

sou- 

■HER 

M  YE1 

.LOW 

PINE 

"A    Fl 

tAT  C 

•RAir 

)  FLO 

DRIN 

;/ 

s. 

DE 

JVEI 

(ED  PRICE 

v 

y 

22^ 

<VND 

23c 

RAT 

E 

s 

/ 

U^^,_ 

'HE 

1LO< 

:k 

PENr 

tSYL> 

/ANI/ 

*,    ST 

>CK 

WH 

>LES 

M.E 

NEVV 

YOF 

K   Pf 

SICE 

53.50 


44.00 


29.50 


22.25 


1891  1895    1896  1897    1898  1899    1900  1901     1902   1903  I904    1905  1906 

-Rise  in  prices  per  thousand  feet  of  different  kinds  of  lumber, 
1894-1906. 


MORE    EFFECTIVE    CONTROL    OF    FOREST    FIRES. 


The  first  essential  at  all  times  to  successful  forest  management  is  protection  from 
fire.     There  are  reasons  for  believing  that  decided  gains  have  been  made  toward  solving 


528  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

this  perplexing  problem.  Reports  from  State  fire  wardens,  from  National  Forest 
supervisors,  and  from  those  engaged  in  systematic  effort  to  prevent  fires  from  gaining 
headway  on  private  lands,  give  renewed  confidence  as  to  the  effectiveness  of  the 
measures  employed.  In  Michigan  the  loss  during  the  year  was  estimated  at  $460,000, 
and  in  Idaho,  Washington,  and  Oregon  it  was  also  heavy;  but  throughout  the  country 
in  general,  loss  from  this  cause,  of  timber  standing  and  in  the  mill,  has  been  com- 
paratively light.  In  the  National  Forests  the  area  burned  over  was  115,416  acres,  or 
0.12  of  1  per  cent  of  the  97,000.000  acres  from  which  reports  were  received.  Thus, 
even  as  compared  with  the  excellent  record  of  1905,  when  the  area  burned  over  was 
0.16  of  1  per  cent,  a  gain  in  efficiency  of  one-fourth  was  made. 

RAILROADS    AND    MINE    OWNERS    APPLY   FORESTRY. 

For  four  years  railroads  have  been  cooperating  with  the  Government  in  investigating 
the  present  tie  supply,  the  possibilities  of  planting  trees  for  ties,  and  methods  for 
prolonging  the  life  of  ties  through  mechanical  devices  to  lessen  wear  and  through 
preservative  treatment.  Studies  in  seasoning  and  preservation  have  enabled  railroads 
in  the  Northwest  to  use  lodgepole  pine  as  tie  timber,  and  have  stimulated  the  building 
of  treating  plant?  by  railroads  in  the  Mississippi  Valley.  Other  roads,  through  the 
advice  of  the  Forest  Service,  have  begun  planting  on  a  large  scale.  One  of  these,  the 
Pennsylvania,  is  the  first  to  appoint  a  forester  to  supervise  the  care  and  planting  of 
the  company's  forest  lands.  Already  500,000  trees  have  been  planted ;  and  681  acre?  i  >f 
land  near  Altoona,  Pa.,  wdl  be  stocked  with  chestnut  and  white  oak  in  the  next  two 
years.  The  Santa  Fe  Railway  has  recently  purchased  8,330  acres  near  San  Diego.  Gal . , 
on  which  to  grow  timber  for  its  own  use.  A  tract  of  2.600  acres  will  be  planted  to 
eucalypts.  The  Lehigh  Coal  and  Navigation  Company  will  plant  378  acres  in  Carbon 
and  Schuylkill  counties.  Pa.,  with  chestnut.  European  larch,  and  Scotch  pine.  The 
Delaware  and  Hudson  Company  was  led  by  the  results  of  a  cooperative  study  with 
the  Forest  Sen-ice  to  appoint  a  forester  to  look  after  the  extensive  woodlands  of  the 
company  and  attend  to  the  planting  work. 

The  Philadelphia  and  Reading  Coal  and  Iron  Company  has  been  investigating  how 
mine  props  may  be  made  to  last  longer  through  impregnating  with  creosote  by  the 
"open-tank"  treatment.  Mine  props  cost  this  company  alone  nearly  a  million  dollars 
a  month.  The  results  of  this  treatment  are  so  satisfactory  that  plans  have  been  made 
for  the  erection  of  a  plant,  with  a  capacity  of  about  800  cubic  feet  a  day,  with  which  to 
continue  the  treatment  on  a  commercial  scale.  This  work  has  shown  the  economy  of 
the  open-tank  treatment  and  encouraged  its  wider  use. 

SOME    PROJECTS    OF   THE     FOREST    SERVICE. 

A  planting  plan  was  recently  prepared  for  a  tract  of  800  acres  on  an  island  in  the 
Cimarron  River  in  Oklahoma.  The  owner  desires  a  crop  of  posts  and  poles  of  quick- 
growing  and  durable  wood,  and  for  this  purpose  in  that  region  black  locust  was  recom- 
mended. It  is  designed  that  the  tract  shall  eventually  form  a  pleasure  resort  for  the 
city  of  Enid,  from  which  it  is  20  miles  distant. 

Unusual  interest  in  forest  methods  has  recently  been  manifested  by  companies 
engaged  in  redwood  lumbering  in  California.  A  plan  prepared  for  a  tract  of  15,000  acres, 
which  provides  for  planting  eucalypts  on  cut-over  redwood  lands,  has  been  put  into 
execution.  The  eucalypts,  besides  growing  one  or  more  crops  while  the  redwood  is 
maturing  and  thus  hastening  the  returns  on  the  investment,  will  in  the  competition 
for  growing  space  assist  the  redwood  to  form  long,  branchless  trunks.  Where  the 
tempering  influence  of  the  coast  fogs  is  felt,  conditions  are  ideal  for  the  growing  of 
eucalypts  suitable  for  lumber,  and,  because  of  the  lack  of  other  hardwood  timber,  a 
good  market  is  promised.  The  indications  are  that  similar  plans  will  be  adopted  by 
other  companies. 

An  improved  system  of  map  files  has  been  introduced  with  a  central  equipment, 
known  as  the  Forest  Atlas.  By  this  means  maps  containing  all  available  data,  topo- 
graphic, political,  industrial,  and  geological,  are  filed  flat  in  compact  form  in  dust-proof 
and  fireproof  cases,  indexed  for  ready  reference.  Forest  and  grazing  conditions  are 
noted  in  the  fullest  detail.  At  the  headquarters  of  every  forest  supervisor  will  be  filed 
atlas  sheets  relating  to  the  Forests  under  his  administration. 

During  the  year  the  Forest  Service  has  made  examination  of  54  timber  tracts,  located 
in  25  different  States,  aggregating  2,288,132  aeres;  and  of  70  woodlots  with  a  total  of 
6.255  acres. 

Through  an  investigation  of  the  piling  used  in  wharf  construction,  data  have  been 
secured  showing  the  enormous  loss  resulting  from  marine  borer  attacks  and  the  ineffi- 
ciency of  present  protective  measures  and  the  possibility  of  cheapening  and  improving 
them. 


PROGRESS  OF  FORESTRY  IN  1906.  529 

Timber  tests  for  several  months  have  been  chiefly  concerned  in  determining  the 
strength  and  other  physical  properties  of  Douglas  fir,  western  hemlock,  loblolly  pine, 
Norway  pine,  and  tamarack,  in  such  forms  as  car  sills,  bridge  stringers,  and  other 
structural  timbers.  Tests  of  eucalypts  indicate  that  they  can  be  used  as  substitutes 
for  hickory  and  oak  for  many  purposes. 

In  cooperation  with  the  Northern  Pacific  Railway,  experimental  sections  of  track 
are  being  laid  to  study  the  influence  of  different  methods  of  handling  timbers.  Tests 
are  to  be  made  of  the  rate  of  seasoning  of  timbers  cut  during  different  months,  to  deter- 
mine the  relation  between  the  season  of  cutting  and  rate  of  absorption  of  preservatives, 
and  to  determine  the  comparative  durability  of  seasoned,  treated,  and  green  timbers 
in  use  in  the  track.  The  species  used  are  Douglas  fir,  western  tamarack,  western  hem- 
lock, and  giant  arborvita?. 

Studies  of  the  requirements  and  adaptability  of  wood  for  specific  uses  promise  a 
saving  in  the  substitution  of  new  woods.  Further  economy  has  been  found  possible 
in  the  use  of  sound  dead  and  down  timber  on  the  National  Forests.  The  lumbermen 
and  the  Forest  Sendee  have  been  brought  into  closer  touch  through  cooperation  in 
compiling  a  report  seeking  to  assist  in  the  standardization  of  grading  rules  and  detailed 
classified  statistics  of  forest  products.  Experiments  in  turpentining  have  shown  that 
the  economy  effected  by  the  cup  and  gutter  system  may  be  increased  by  reducing  the 
wound  made  in  chipping.  Trees  shallowly  chipped  according  to  the  new  method 
produce  at  least  as  much  resin  and  of  better  quality  for  a  much  longer  period  with 
remarkable  saving  as  a  result. 

FORESTRY    IX    THE    STATES. 

Forest  work  carried  on  by  the  States  made  greater  advance  during  1906  than  in  any 
previous  year.  More  than  20  States  now  have  forest  officers,  and  10  have  State  forest 
reservations  (fig.  22).  In  "Wisconsin  the  State  forests,  comprising  254.072  acres,  are 
scattered  through  17  counties,  situated  north  of  a  line  from  St.  Paul  to  Green  Bay. 
Isolated  lands  are  being  sold  and  lands  purchased  contiguous  to  the  main  body  on  the 
headwaters  of  the  "Wisconsin.  Within  the  boundary  of  the  Catskill  Preserve*  in  Xew 
York  there  are  92,708  acres  of  State  lands  and  483.412  acres  privately  owned:  the  total 
area  of  the  Adirondack  Preserve  is  3,313,564  acres,  of  which  the  State  now  owns  1 .347,280 
acres.  The  Hawaiian  reserves  include  an  area  of  300.000  acres,  of  which  the  Territory 
owns  nearly  half,  but  all  is  managed  under  plane  prepared  by  the  Superintendent  of 
Forestry. 

In  5  States — Connecticut.  Xew  Jersey,  Pennsylvania.  Michigan,  and  "Wisconsin— 
the  removal  of  mature  timber  from  State  forest  lands  is  now  permitted,  a  provision 
which  is  a  fundamental  principle  of  forestry. 

In  Nebraska,  Iowa.  Maine,  and  Mississippi  additional  data  concerning  State  forest 
conditions  have  been  secured  through  studies  conducted  by  the  professor  of  forestry 
at  the  State  college  or  university.  It  is  the  duty  of  the  State  forester  in  Maryland 
and  Massachusetts  to  give  a  course  of  lectures  each  year  at  the  State  agricultural  college, 
and  in  Wisconsin  at  the  State  university. 

The  University  of  Texas  is  still  engaged,  with  the  Forest  Service,  upon  a  study  of  the 
State's  forest  resources:  in  a  similar  cooperative  study,  the  Missouri  State  Experiment 
Station  has  just  completed  an  investigation  of  the  timber  resources  of  the  Ozark 
region;  the  Kentucky  legislature  last  March  provided  for  a  commissioner  of  forestry, 
and  appropriated  82,000  to  be  expended  in  a  cooperative  study  of  the  State's  forests. 

A  year  and  a  half  have  enabled  the  State  forester  of  California  to  organize  fire  patrol 
in  10  counties,  as  well  as  to  interest  a  large  number  of  associations  and  clubs  in  fire  pro- 
tection and  to  prepare  a  large  planting  plan  for  a  eucalyptus  plantation  on  cut-over 
redwood  land  at  F<  >rt  Bragg.  Fire  wardens  to  the  number  of  367  have  been  appointed, 
and  30  miles  of  fire  lines,  from  30  to  60  feet  wide,  have  been  cleared,  encircling  the 
Redwood  Park. 

The  chief  progress  during  the  year  in  Connecticut  was  the  organization  under  the 
new  law  of  a  fire-warden  service  of  300  members.  This  service  was  instrumental  in 
extinguishing  64  fires  at  an  average  cost  of  $7.50  and  in  largely  reducing  the  loss 
through  forest  fires.  The  feeling  of  increased  security  from  fire  resulted  in  more  forest 
planting  in  Connecticut  than  was  ever  done  before  in  a  single  year.  Under  the  direc- 
tion of  the  State  forester,  150.000  trees  were  planted  by  the  State  and  private  owners. 

The  Delaware  State  Experiment  Station,  in  cooperation  with  the  Forest  Service,  is 
making  a  study  of  forest  conditions  on  which  to  base  recommendations  for  a  State  forest 
policy  and  plans  of  management  for  different  stands  of  timber  and  different  classes  of 
land. 

3    A1906 34 


530 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


.  -  -  -  State  forest  reservations. 

Area  and  location  of  State  Forest  rese- 


Name  and  J  - 


Total 


Connecticut. 
Hawaii 


Middlesex  Countv 
2.  Union  Tract.  Tolland  County 


Indiana 

Maryland . . 

Mich.. 
Minnesota. 

Kew  Jersey 
York. 


Pennsylvania. 


1.  Kaipanau,  Oahu 

_'.  Hamafau  Paii.  Hawaii 

3.  Hi!o,  Hawaii 

4.  Koolan  Maui,  Maui 

5.  Halelea.  Kauai 

C.  Kealia.  Kauai 

7.  Ewa,  Oahu 

6.  Honuaula.  Hawaii 

0.  Kau,  Hawaii 

10.  Waianae-kai,  Oahu 

11.  Lualualei,  Oahu 

12.  Hana,  Maui 

te  reservation.  Clark  County 

*  Countv ." 

2.  State  reserve,  Baltimore  County 


State  reserve.  Roscommon  and  Crawford  counties 

1.  Burntside  I  ranty 

2.  Pillsbury  Tract,  Cass  County " 

State  Park,  Clearwater,  Becker,  and  Hubbard 
counties 


s  Landing  Tract,  Atlantic  County. 

2.  Bass  River  Tract,  Burlington  County. 

3.  Blairstown  Tract,  Warren  Count- .... 


Acres. 
1,060 
300 

913 

16.  133 

12.771 

14,300 

10.990 

1       ' 

"   • 

665 

35,960 

3,150 

3,743 

ISA 


3,500 
40 


20.000 
1,000 


21 . 80S 


- 
1.550 

551 


Wiaoi  Min. 


1.  Adirondack  Preserve.  Clinton.  Essex,  Franklin.  Fulton, 

Hamilton.  Herkimer.  J.  la,  St.  Lawrence, 

Saratoga.  Warren,  and  Washington  counties 1.34", 230 

2.  Cal  -,  Delaware,  Greene,  Sullivan,  and  Ulster 

counties .  "  ■ 

State  reserves, Adams,Bedford,Cameron,Center,Clearfield. 
Clinton,  Cumberland,  Dauphin,  Llk,  Franklin,  Fulton. 
Huntingdon,  Juniata,  Lackawanna,  Lycoming.  Mifflin. 
Monroe,  Pik<-,  Potter                                   nion,  and  V. 
ming  counties " 

Fore>-                       Ashland,    Bayfield,   Burnett,  Dout.' 
Florence.  Forest.  Gates.  Iron.  Langlade,  Lincoln.  v 
nette.  Oneida,  Polk,  Price,                       ...is,  and  Wash- 
burn counties 


A  errs. 
1,360 


117,532 
2,000 


3,548 

:9,ooo 


42,800 

2.474 

1,439,988 

830,000 

I 


In  the  Territory  of  Hawaii  a  -  :  y  supplies  plant  mate-rial  free  -  and 

other  public  purposes  and  at  a  low  price  for  private  use.     District  foresters  and  district 


Yearbook  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  1906. 


Plate  XLIII 


Fig.    1. — Transplant   Beds  of  Nursery  at   Saranac   Inn,    N.   Y.     Norway   Spruce,   3  Years  Old, 
Foreground;  Scotch  Pine  to  the  Left. 


Fig.   2. — Scotch  and  White  Pine,   5  Years  Old,   in  the  Lake  Clear  Plantation. 

Successful  Example  of  Planting  Denuded  State  Land. 


PE OGRESS    OF    FORESTRY    IN    1906.  531 

fire  wardens  have  been  appointed,  who  report  regularly  to  the  superintendent  of 
forestry. 

The* Indiana  forest  commission  has  been  engaged  on  a  study  of  the  natural  and 
planted  forests  of  the  State.  The  results,  which  have  been  published  and  distributed, 
should  greatly  stimulate  the  practice  of  forestry.  Trees  have  already  been  planted 
on  300  acres  of  the  State  reservation,  and  57,000  more  trees  are  to  be  transplanted  from 
the  State  nursery  this  spring. 

The  Kansas  commissioner  of  forestry  is  gathering  statistics  of  forest  planting  through 
annual  reports  from  those  to  whom  stock  lias  been  furnished. 

The  commissioner  of  forestry  of  Louisiana,  in  the  enforcement  of  the  forest  law  passed 
in  1904,  gives  first  attention  to  the  suppression  of  fires. 

The  class  Ln  forestry  in  the  University  of  Maine  made  a  study  of  forest  conditions  in 
Indian  Township,  Washington  County,  a  tract  of  24,072  acres  of  State  land,  securing 
data  lor  a  map  and  an  estimate  of  the  stand  of  timber.  Facts  concerning  the  growth 
of  largi  '-tooth  and  Trembling  aspen  and  gray  birch  were  also  secured.  A  study  of  wood- 
lot  management,  now  in  progress,  aims  to  learn  the  best  methods  of  marking  trees 
and  the  cost  of  cutting  and  yarding  logs  and  of  piling  and  burning  the  brush. 

On  July  1  a  forester  was  appointed  by  the  newly  created  Maryland  board  of  for- 
estrv.  A  portion  of  the  autumn  was  spent  in  making  a  reconnaissance  of  the  forest 
lands  of  the  State. 

Forest  work  in  Massachusetts  is  carried  on  along  three  general  lines — education, 
the  installation  of  typical  plans  of  management,  and  the  gathering  of  technical  data. 
Effort  is  being  made  to  assist  landowners  in  transforming  large  areas  now  practically 
idle  on  account  of  mismanagement  into  profitable  woodlots.  Fifty-five  students 
took  the  course  in  forestry  at  the  agricultural  college  last  year. 

Marked  progress  was  made  in  Zdichigan  in  improvements,  surveys,  fire  lines,  and 
planting  on  the  State  forest  reserve.  Forty  acres  were  seeded  to  western  yellow  pine 
last  spring  and  200,000  conifers  were  planted.  Two  and  a  half  million  seedlings  are 
now  on  hand  in  the  nursery. 

Through  the  splendid  efforts  of  a  volunteer  patrol  the  excellent  fire  law  of  Minne- 
sota was  made  effective  in  keeping  forest  fires  well  under  control.  The  damage  for 
the  year  is  placed  by  the  State  iire  warden  at  §10,000. 

Two  experimental  forest  nurseries  and  a  study  of  actual  profits  in  the  eastern  part 
of  the  State  will  increase  the  knowledge  of  the  possibilities  in  forestry  in  Nebraska, 
the  leading  tree-planting  State. 

New  Hampshire  occupies  a  unique  position  in  that  besides  the  State  forestry  com- 
mission, reorganized  and  active,  it  has  a  forest  association,  which  maintains  a  State 
forester. 

A  State  fire  warden  and  70  township  wardens  have  been  appointed  in  New  Jersey 
under  the  law  which  became  effective  July  1,  1906.  The  fall  season  was  remarkably 
exempt  from  serious  fires.  At  the  beginning  of  the  year  1907  a  State  forester  was 
appointed,  who  will  give  assistance  to  private  landowners,  give  courses  of  instruction 
to  teachers  and  farmers,  and  cooperate  with  the  State  fire  warden  and  with  the  Forest 
Park  Reservation  Commission. 

Under  the  law  of  1905  the  superintendent  of  forests  of  New  York  was  able  to  patrol 
the  State  preserves  efficiently  during  the  dry  season  at  small  expense.  To  supply 
stock  for  planting  in  the  preserves  the  State  maintains  3  large  nurseries  for  conifers 
in  Franklin  County  and  1  for  hardwoods  in  Ulster  County,  in  the  Catskills.  The 
three  Adirondack  nurseries  combined  have  a  capacity  of  a  million  3-year-old  trans- 
plants per  annum.  One  of  these,  the  Saranac  Inn  Nursery  (PI.  XLIII,  fig.  1),  was 
established  by  the  State  in  1903  and  the  others,  Axton  ajtd  Wawbeek,  were  first 
established  by  the  Cornell  College  of  Forestry  and  were  placed  in  charge  of  the  State 
forest  commission  in  the  spring  of  1906.  Five  plantations,  embracing  an  area  of  1.500 
acres,  have  been  planted.  (PI.  XLIII,  fig.  2.)  In  1905  and  1906,  50  acres  of  pines 
and  spruces  were  planted  by  the  seed-spot  method,  with  encouraging  results.  Broad- 
cast sowing  last  March  of  white  pine,  red  spruce,  and  balsam  was  not  satisfactory. 
An  interesting  experiment  is  being  conducted  with  5  species  of  Siberian  conifers — 
pines,  fir.  and  larch — to  determine  their  fitness  for  planting  in  the  North  Woods. 

In  Ohio  the  department  of  forestry  at  the  State  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 
was  engaged  in  cooperative  work  in  planting  with  the  farmers  of  the  State.  Planta- 
tions aggregating  500  acres  were  thus  established. 

The  State  nurseries  of  Pennsylvania  were  doubled  in  size  in  1906  and  now  compri.-e 
6  acres  at  Mont  Alto,  the  location  of  the  State  forestry  academy,  and  2  acres  in  Hunt- 
ingdon County.  Last  spring  160.000  white  pine  seedlings  were  set  out,  and  400  pounds 
of  white  pine  seed  is  to  be  planted  this  spring.  The  last  legislature  voted  to  expend 
§400,000  annually  for  five  years  in  purchasing  additional  State  forest  lands. 

In  Vermont  planting  of  waste  lands  is  being  encouraged  by  the  commissioner  of 
forestry,  who  estimates  that  there  are  4,000,000  acres  of  land  now  unproductive,  but 


532  YEARBOOK    OE    THE   DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

suited  to  the  growing  of  timber.  These,  if  rightly  handled,  he  asserts,  would  give  an 
annual  income  of  from  $1  to  $2  per  acre.  From  the  State  nursery  at  Burlington  plant 
material  will  be  supplied  at  cost.  Through  cooperation  with  the  New  York  forest 
commission  the  assistance  of  a  trained  forester  is  secured. 

The  appropriation  of  §25,000  by  the  Washington  State  legislature  was  exhausted  at 
the  beginning  of  the  forest-fire  season  of  1906.  The  action  of  the  lumbermen  of  the 
State  in  coming  promptly  to  the  rescue  of  the  State  fire  warden  with  individual  sub- 
scriptions of  funds  ample  to  defray  the  expenses  of  patrol  until  the  next  session  of  the 
State  legislature  is  one  of  the  encouraging  evidences  of  a  practical  belief  in  forest 
protection. 

Over  300  fire  wardens  have  been  appointed  in  "Wisconsin,  whose  services  were 
secured  at  a  cost  for  the  season  of  $1,530.  They  report  160  fires,  which  burned  ever 
76.125  acres.  Sixty  per  cent  of  the  fires  were  cans  <1  by  settlers  in  clearing  and  burn- 
ing for  pasture.  With  lessened  danger  that  their  investments  will  be  swept  away  by 
fire,  lumbermen  have  begun  to  limit  the  diameter  to  which  they  cut,  and  to  buy  young 
growth  and  protect  it  from  fire. 

Since  Rhode  Island,  during  the  past  year,  passed  a  forest  law  and  appointed  a  for- 
ester, all  of  the  New  England  States — indeed,  all  but  three  of  the  original  thirteen — 
with  an  area  equal  to  that  of  the  National  Forests  in  the  Western  States,  are  equipped 
with  State  officers  charged  with  the  welfare  of  their  forest  interests.  Westward  this 
chain  extends,  including  Ohio  and  Indiana,  and  the  three  Lake  States  which  for 
twenty  years  have  furnished  one-third  of  the  lumber  produced  in  the  country. 

FOREST   LEGISLATION. 

Only  a  few  of  the  State  legislative  assemblies  were  in  sessinn  during  the  winter  of 
1905-6,  and  in  consequence  there  was  but  little  additional  legislation  enacted.  The 
laws  passed  are  briefly  summarized  as  follows: 

United  States. — Agricultural  settlement  was  permitted  in  restricted  portion  of 
Yellowstone  Reserve  (34  Stat.,  62).  Appropriations  for  agricultural  experiment  sta- 
tions in  the  States  and  Territories  were  increased  to  §30,000  each,  the  added  income 
to  be  used  at  discretion  in  forest  experiments  (34  Stat.,  63).  A  grant  was  made  to 
Edison  Electric  Company  of  easement  to  occupy  land  in  San  Bernardino,  Sierra,  and 
San  Gabriel  National  Forests  for  power  plants  (34  Stat.,  163).  Cutting,  chipping,  and 
boxing  trees  on  public  lands  was  prohibited  (34  Stat.,  208).  Appropriation  or  destruc- 
tion of  American  antiquities  was  prohibited,  except  under  certain  conditions  (34 
Stat.,  225).  The  Secretary  of  Agriculture  was  empowered  to  list  lands  within  National 
Forests  as  agricultural  for  entry  under  homestead  laws  (34  Stat.,  233).  Recession 
by  California  of  Yosemite  Valley  and  Mariposa  Big  Tree  Grove  was  accepted  (34 
Stat.,  831).  Lands  were  granted  to  Wisconsin  for  forest  reserves  (34  Stat.,  517).  The 
President  was  empowered  to  set  aside  game  preserves  in  Grand  Canyon  (34  Stat., 
607). 

Iowa. — Taxes  on  "private  reserves,"  under  certain  conditions,  were  fixed  at  $1 
per  acre,  fruit-tree  reserves  included.  Secretary  of  the  State  horticultural  society 
was  designated  to  be  State  forester,  and  authorized  to  have  deputies  (Ch.  52,  addi- 
tional to  code,  Ch.  1,  tit.  7). 

Kentucky. — The  State  board  of  agriculture,  forestry,  and  immigration  was  em- 
powered to  act  as  forestry  commission.  This  board  is  permitted  to  expend  $2,000 
to  further  forest  interests,  this  money  to  be  spent  in  cooperation  with  the  Federal  Gov- 
ernment, if  the  latter  provides  a  like  sum  (Ch.  90,  repealing  S.  37  and  38,  Ch.  4, 
Ky.  Stat.). 

Maryland. — The  State  board  of  forestry  was  created;  the  appointment  of  a  forester 
was  provided  for;  this  official  was  authorized  to  have  general  protective  power  over 
parks  and  forest  reserves,  to  cooperate  with  corporations  and  individuals,  and  to 
appoint  fire  wardens,  the  latter  to  force  service  from  inhabitants,  when  necessary,  to 
fight  fire.  An  appropriation  was  made  of  §3,500  annually  for  1907  and  1908,  and  pen- 
alties are  to  be  paid  to  the  forest-reserve  fund.  Counties  are  empowered  to  spend 
money  in  forest  protection  and  to  recover  from  land  owners  for  expenses  in  fire  fight- 
ing. Fire  warnings  are  to  be  posted;  criminal  and  civil  liability  was  provided  for 
unlawful  fire  building;  offenders  are  also  to  be  liable  to  the  State  and  county  for  fire- 
fighting  expenses;  locomotives  not  burning  oil  are  to  be  equipped  with  fire-prevent- 
ing appliances,  under  penalty  (Ch.  294). 

New  Jersey. — State  board  of  forestry  was  authorized  to  cooperate  with  munici- 
palities, corporations,  and  individuals  for  control  of  forest  land,  for  establishment  of 


GAME    PROTECTION    IN    1906.  533 

an  arboretum,  and  for  experiments  in  forest  culture  (Ch.  25).  The  commissioners 
are  to  fix  price  and  contract  for  the  purchase  of  forest  reserve  land.  Municipalities 
are  empowered  to  use  their  land  for  forest  purposes,  to  sell  timber,  to  contract  with 
State  board  of  forest  park  commissioners  for  control  and  management  of  land,  lands 
so  used  being  declared  devoted  to  public  use  (Ch.  146).  The  State  fire  warden  is  to 
be  appointed  by  the  State  board,  and  the  fire  warden  system  was  established.  Com- 
pulsory service  of  male  inhabitants  and  property,  with  remuneration,  was  authorized. 
Provision  was  made  for.  and  allotment  was  made  of,  fire-fighting  expenses;  fire  warn- 
ings are  to  be  posted;  large  fires  are  to  be  reported  to  the  State  warden;  the  season 
for  brush  burning  was  limited;  fires  must  be  watched;  back  firing  is  allowed  under 
certain  conditions.  Process,  appeal,  and  execution  in  fire  cases  were  provided. 
Money  was  appropriated  (Ch.  39,  acts  1902)  to  be  used  solely  for  fire  fighting  (Ch.  123, 
repealing  or  amending  a  number  of  former  acts). 

New  York. — State  forester  is  authorized  to  appoint  a  secretary.  Salaries  of  sub- 
ordinate officers  are  fixed  (Ch.  206,  amending  S.  154,  172,  and  224a,  Ch.  20,  laws  1900). 
Commissioners  are  empowered  to  appoint  a  chief  fire  warden  and  five  inspectors  (Ch. 
519,  amending  S.  224a,  Ch.  20,  laws  1900). 

Ohio. — A  department  of  forestry  at  the  agricultural  experiment  station  was  created, 
to  cooperate  with  the  Federal  Government.  The  State  forestry  bureau  connected 
with  the  State  University  was  abolished  (P.  54). 

Rhode  Island. — Office  of  State  forester  was  created  forester  to  publish  informa- 
tion .and  to  recommend  legislation  (Ch.  32). 

GAME    PROTECTION    IN    1906. 

By  T.  S.  Palmer,  Assistant,  Biological  Survey. 

The  record  of  game  protection  in  1906  is  noteworthy  in  several  respects.  New  leg- 
islation, while  small  in  volume  as  compared  with  that  of  1905,  included  several  impor- 
tant measures.  The  question  of  Federal  control  of  the  protection  of  migratory  game 
birds  again  attracted  widespread  attention  and  was  the  subject  of  much  discussion. 
More  than  the  average  number  of  cases  based  on  game  laws  were  decided  by  courts  of 
last  resort.  In  the  establishment  of  game  preserves  under  private,  State,  and  Federal 
auspices  notable  progress  was  made.  The  destruction  of  quail  by  the  severity  of  the 
two  preceding  winters  resulted  iu  large  shipments  of  these  birds  from  Alabama  and 
the  Southwest  in  the  effort  to  restock  some  of  the  Northern  and  Eastern  Stat<  s. 
Experiments  were  continued  also  in  introducing  new  game  birds,  and  English  pheas- 
ant eggs  and  gray  partridges  were  imported  from  Europe  in  unusually  large  numbers. 

LEGISLATION. 

Game  legislation  in  1906  was  remarkable  for  the  unusual  number  of  bills  under  con- 
sideration by  Congress  and  the  small  number  of  changes  in  State  laws.  The  Federal 
laws  enacted  comprised  acts  authorizing  the  Secretary  of  the  Interior  to  lease  3,500 
acres  of  land  in  South  Dakota  as  a  buffalo  preserve,  prohibiting  trapping  or  trespass 
on  bird  refuges,  establishing  a  game  refuge  on  the  Grand  Canyon  National  Forest  in 
Arizona,  and  prohibiting  hunting  in  the  greater  part  of  the  District  of  Columbia.  An 
appropriation  of  $15,000  was  made  for  the  erection  of  a  fence  for  a  buffalo  inclosurc 
on  the  Wichita  Game  Preserve  in  Oklahoma. 

Only  15  States  and  8  provinces  held  regular  legislative  sessions  during  the  year, 
and  the  number  of  new  laws  enacted  was  about  60,  including  7  in  Canada,  while  the 
total  number  of  bills  introduced  in  the  United  States  and  Canada  exceeded  150.  The 
most  important  measures  adopted  were  entire  new  game  laws  in  Mississippi,  laws  pro- 
tecting nongame  birds  in  Iowa,  and  radical  amendments  to  the  sale  laws  in  Massachu- 
setts. The  failure  of  all  general  game  bills  and  the  passage  of  18  local  measures  in 
Maryland  showed  that  the  system  of  county  laws  is  still  preferred,  but  the  local  acts 
passed  tended  in  general  toward  greater  uniformity  in  seasons.  The  only  changes  in 
hunting  license  fees  were  the  establishment  of  a  $25  nonresident  license  in  South 
Carolina  and  a  $20  nonresident  license  in  Mississippi,  both  good  only  in  the  county  of 
issue.  In  Vermont  the  nonresident  license  was  extended  to  include  birds,  and  in 
Maryland  minor  changes  were  made  in  the  license  laws  of  the  counties  bordering  the 
Patuxent  River  and  of  Somerset  County.  Important  sale  restrictions  were  adopted 
in  Mississippi  and  Massachusetts.  In  the  former  State  the  sale  of  all  protected  game 
was  prohibited  and  in  Massachusetts  sale  of  imported  quail  Avas  prohibited  except  in 
November  and  December,  sale  of  imported  ducks  except  during  the  open  season,  and 


534  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGBICULTUBE. 

the  sale  at  any  time  of  prairie  chicken?  and  sharp-tailed  grouse.  For  the  first  time  in 
Mississippi  a  game-warden  service  was  installed  by  providing  lor  the  appointment  of 
county  wardens  to  look  after  the  enforcement  of  game  laws  in  place  of  sheriffs  and 
local  peace  officers. 

Among  the  numerous  bills  which  failed  to  pass  were  some  measures  of  special  inter- 
est. Ten  of  the  11  bills  introduced  in  Kentucky  failed  to  receive  favorable  considera- 
tion, and  in  Massachusetts  only  10  of  the  30  bills  introduced  became  laws.  Bills  to 
prohibit  the  use  of  automatic  shotguns  in  hunting  game  in  the  District  of  Columbia, 
Georgia.  Massachusetts.  Mississippi.  Xew  Jersey.  Xew  York.  Ohio.  Rhode  Island, 
and  Virginia  were  introduced,  but  none  received  favorable  action.  The  general  game 
bill  in  Maryland  contained  a  provision  making  it  lawful  to  kill  cats  found  searching 
for  birds.  Three  special  cat  bills  were  introduced  also  in  Massachusetts.  One  of 
these  declared  a  cat  to  be  property  if  it  wears  a  collar  with  the  name  and  residence  cf 
the  owner,  another  provided  a  penalty  for  abandoning  cats,  and  a  third  made  it  an 
offense  to  harbor  cats  known  to  kill  game  or  wild  birds.  Among  the  10  bills  which 
failed  in  Virginia  were  two  to  create  the  office  of  State  game  commissioner  and  others 
providing  for  a  $100  nonresident  license  and  a  $1  resident  license. 

DECISIONS    OF    THE    COURTS. 

The  decisions  rendered  by  courts  of  last  resort  in  cases  affecting  game  were  more 
numerous  than  in  1905.  and  although  none  of  the  questions  decided  were  especiaily 
novel.  several,  affecting  sale,  duties  of  common  carriers,  and  rights  of  hunting  and 
fishing  clubs,  were  of  considerable  interest.  Probably  the  most  important  decision  of 
the  year  was  that  rendered  in  February  by  the  court  of  appeals  of  Xew  York  (People 
ex  rel.  Silz  v.  Hesterberg.  76  X.  E..  1032)  involving  the  sale  during  the  close  a 

.  tain  game  birds  imported  from  Europe.  In  this  case  the  contention  of  the  State, 
first  maintained  in  1S75.  that  imported  birds  were  subject  to  the  restrictions  of  the 
local  laws  to  the  same  extent  as  birds  captured  in  the  State  was  upheld.  The  decision 
is  important  also  in  being  the  first  construction  of  a  higher  court  of  section  5  of  the  Lai-  ey 
Ac:  relative  to  imported  game.  In  line  with  the  same  decision  was  one  rendered  by 
the  supreme  court  of  New  Y'ork  in  October  in  the  case  of  People  v.  '\Yaklorf-Asu.ria 
Hotel  Co.  ("Forest  and  Stream."  LXYII.  p.  6S7l  In  Arkansas  the  supreme  court 
of  the  State  held  (Wells-Fargo  Express  Co.  v.  State.  96  S.  Y\~ .,  189)  that  the  fact  that  an 
express  company  did  not  know  the  contents  of  a  package  containing  game  was  no 
defense  in  a  prosecution  for  transporting  game  out  of  the  State,  particularly  as  com- 
mon carriers  were  authorized  by  the  law  of  that  State  to  open  and  examine  any  pack- 
age suspected  to  contain  game.  An  important  decision  confirming  the  rights  of  the 
Big  Lake  Shooting  Club,  at  Big  Lake.  Arkansas,  was  rendered  by  the  United  States 
circuit  court  of  appeals  (Harrison  v.  Fite.  148  Fed.,  781).  This  club,  controlling  a 
preserve  of  some  25,000  acres  in  Mississippi  County.  Ark.,  obtained  from  the  United 
States  circuit  court  an  injunction,  which  was  sustained  by  the  circuit  court  of  appeals, 
preventing  one  Harrison  and  36  others  from  shooting  on  the  club's  preserve  In  Colo- 
rado, a  decision  in  a  suit  by  the  State  for  the  possession  of  deer  hides,  following  Horn- 
beke  v.  White  i  76  Pac.  926;.  held  that  a  person  having  them  must  establish  affirma- 
tively that  his  possession  is  lawful  (People  v.  Johnson.  68  Pac.  184).  In  Louisiana  a 
decision  of  interest  to  club  members  was  rendered  in  the  case  of  Burns  v.  Crescent 
Gun  and  Rod  Club  i  41  So..  249 '.  in  which  it  was  held  that  the  club  owning  land  bor- 
dering a  navigable  stream  could  be  enjoined  from  preventing  persons  not  members  of 
the  club  from  fishing  in  such  stream.  The  comprehensive  game  law  enacted  in  Mis- 
souri in  1905  was  the  subject  of  more  or  less  litigation  and  at  least  three  cases  were 
carried  to  the  higher  courts.  In  one  of  these.  State  ex  rel  Rodes  r.  'Warner  |  94  S.  \Y., 
962  I,  it  was  held  that  the  provision  directing  fines  to  be  paid  into  the  State  game  fund 
was  in  conflict  with  the  constitutional  provision  that  all  fines  be  paid  into  the  county 
school  fund  and  to  this  extent  was  void.  In  the  others  the  provisions  relating  to 
resident  licenses  gave  rise  to  two  opposite  constructions,  the  St.  Louis  court  of  appeals 
holding  that  a  person  was  not  required  to  obtain  a  license  to  hunt  in  the  county  of 
residence  I  Ex  parte  Helton.  93  S.  W..  913  I  and  the  Kansas  City  court  of  appeals  hold- 
ing that  such  a  license  was  necessary  (State  v.  Koock.  96  S.  W.,  721).  In  Xorth 
"a  the  marking  provision  of  the  Lacey  Act  was  construed  by  the  Federal  court  in 
United  States  p.  Thompson  (147  Fed.,  637).  In  Oklahoma  one  of  the  first  decisions 
affecting  game  rendered  by  the  supreme  court  sustained  the  right  of  the  Territory  to 
impose  fines  on  any  carrier,  or  its  agents,  for  reception  and  possession  of  game  for  trans- 
portation (Cameron  v.  Territory.  86  Pac,  68). 

Among  the  numerous  case?  in  the  lower  courts  are  three  worthy  of  mention.  One 
was  a  decision  of  the  circuit  court  of  Muskingum  County.  Ohio,  based  on  technical 
errors,  but  indicating  the  opinion  of  the  court  that  the  game  law.  prescribing  an  open 


GAME    PROTECTION    IN    1906. 


535 


season  for  quail  "  from  the  15th  day  of  November  to  the  5th  day  of  December,"  should 
be  construed  as  excluding  November  15  and  including  December  5.  The  other  two 
were  Pennsylvania  cases  in  which  juries  acquitted  a  defendant  charged  with  killing 
a  bear  in  close  season  on  the  ground  that  his  action  was  required  by  self-defense, 
and  also  a  game  warden  charged  with. homicide  for  killing  a  game-law  violator  who 
resisted  arrest. 


ADMINISTRATION    AND    ENFORCEMENT    OF   LAWS. 

Officials. — Changes  occurred  in  the  personnel  of  several  of  the  State  game  commis- 
sions, including  the  State  warden  of  Maryland  and  the  warden  of  the  first  district  of 
North  Dakota,  the  secretary  of  the  Delaware  Game  Protective  Association,  and  the 
president  of  the  North  Carolina  Audubon  Society.  The  board  of  game  commissioners 
of  New  Jersey  lost  one  of  its  members  through  death.  In  Canada  the  office  of  game 
inspector  was  established  in  Prince  Edward  Island. 

Changes  among  the  deputy  wardens  were  numerous,  but  whether  or  not  the  total 
force  of  officers  on  duty  was  increased  is  uncertain  through  lack  of  statistics  of  former 
years  for  comparison.  A  census  of  30  States  and  Territories  showed  that  about  20 
States  maintained  regular  salaried  wardens,  the  number  of  deputies  varying  from  one 
in  Iowa  to  65  in  New  York  and  88  in  Wisconsin.  The  number  of  deputies  serving 
without  salary  varied  from  3  in  Wyoming  to  800  in  Colorado.  The  total  number  of 
wardens  on  duty  in  these  States  during  the  latter  part  of  the  year,  as  shown  in  the  fol- 
lowing table,  was  370  under  salary,  489  paid  per  diem,  and  4,914  serving  without  salary; 
in  all,  a  total  of  5,773. 

Table  showing  number  of  game  wardens  on  duty  in  30  States  in  1906. 


State. 

Sala- 
ried. 

Per 
diem. 

With- 
out 
salary. 

Total. 

State. 

Sala- 
ried. 

Per 
diem. 

With- 
out 
salary. 

Total. 

63 

350 
SOO 

G 

03 

362 

806 

142 

7 

17 
1G0 
100 
251 
300 

40 
234 
269 
119 
218 
514 

New  Jersey 

24 

167 
67 
450 

78 

26 
165 

40 
132 
463 
200 

38 

191 

12 
6 

142 

1 

G7 

Colorado 

Now  York 

North  Carolina.. 

65 
S 

44 

515 
52 

78 

an 

10 
15 

26 

150 

10 

8 
40 

9 
39 

75 
250 
29? 

229 
244 
5G 
210 
510 

Pennsylvania 

8 

4 

16 
1 

173 

44 

1 

Utah 

22 

154 

479 

Washington 

34 

235 

Maryland 

5 

1G 
24 
8 
4 

38 

Wisconsin 

Wyoming 

Total 

88 
3 

88 

Minnesota 

Montana 

Nebraska 

25 

3 

31 

370 

439 

4,914 

5,773 

a  County  wardens;  there  are  many  deputies  not  listed  as  the  information  was  not  obtained  in  time. 


Convictions. — Convictions  resulting  in  heavy  fines  were  reported  in  at  least  10  States. 
The  following  cases  illustrate  the  character  of  offenses  for  which  fines  of  $100  or  more 
were  imposed:  In  Colorado,  for  killing  a  mountain  sheep  $300  fine  and  $140  costs; 
in  Illinois,  possession  of  game  in  close  season  $100,  killing  4  quail  in  close  season  $100 
and  costs,  two  nonresidents  hunting  on  resident  licenses  $100  and  costs,  illegal  shipment 
of  quail  $200;  in  Michigan,  for  illegal  shipment  of  venison  $100  and  costs  and  60  days 
in  jail;  in  Minnesota,  illegal  possession  of  2  saddles  of  venison  $115  and  costs,  shipping 
deer  from  the  State  in  excess  of  limit  two  fines  of  $100  and  $147;  in  New  Jersey,  for 
possession  of  4  blue  jays  $100  and  costs,  possession  of  5  robins  $100  and  costs,  possession 
of  4  robins  and  1  thrush  $100  and  costs,  possession  of  5  birds  $100  and  costs;  possession 
of  6  birds  $120  and  costs;  in  New  York,  for  violation  of  the  anti-hounding  law  $200  and 
costs,  illegal  possession  of  4  deer  $200,  illegal  possession  of  quail  $110  and  costs  or  total 
of  $290,  possession  of  grouse  and  quail  out  of  season  $600;  in  five  cases,  offenses  not 
specified,  fines  of  from  $100  to  $550:  in  Oklahoma,  for  shipping  30,000  quail  $350  and 
costs;  in  Oregon,  for  serving  birds  out  of  season  $100;  killing  deer  contrary  to  law  two 
fines  of  $100  each,  three  of  $125,  and  one  of  $250;  in  Pennsylvania,  for  removing  wild 
turkey  chicks  from  the  nest  $250;  in  Vermont,  for  killing  deer  contrary  to  law  seven 
fines  ranging  from  $100  to  $177  each. 

In  a  number  of  cases  the  defendants  were  committed  to  jail  in  default  of  payment 
and  in  a  few  instances  received  a  jail  sentence  in  addition  to  a  fine.  Among  the  cases 
resulting  in  imprisonment  were  the  following:  In  Illinois  two  defendants  each  of  whom 
had  killed  a  prairie  chicken  were  committed  to  jail  for  10  days  for  failure  to  pay  fines, 


536  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

one  defendant  was  committed  to  jail  for  killing  a  pheasant,  throe  for  hunting  without 
a  license,  one  for  hunting  before  sunrise,  and  another  for  killing  quail  out  of  season. 
In  Michigan  two  defendants  received  a  Bentence  of  60  days  in  jail  and  §100  fine  each 
for  attempting  to  ship  venison  out  of  the  State,  and  another  fur  shipping  venison  to 
market.  In  New  Jersey  one  defendant  was  sentenced  for  10  days  for  illegal  possession 
of  a  blue  jay,  and  another  10  days  for  killing  one  partridge;  in  North  Carolina  one 
defendant  was  imprisoned  30  days  for  hunting  on  land  without  permission  in  David- 
son County;  in  Oregon  one  offender  received  a  sentence  of  12^  days  for  trapping  beaver, 
and  two  other  defendants  were  committed  to  jail  in  default  of  payment  of  fines  for  kill- 
ing deer  out  of  season:  in  Pennsylvania  two  aliens  were  sentenced  for  370  and  400 
days,  respectively,  for  hunting  without  licenses  and  killing  song  birds;  and  in  Texas 
two  men  were  sentenced  to  jail,  one  for  10  days  and  the  other  for  30  days,  for  illegally 
trapping  and  shipping  quail. 

Aliens. — The  violation  of  the  game  laws  by  aliens  was  the  subject  of  special  comment 
in  the  reports  of  several  State  game  commission-,  particularly  those  of  Maine.  Penn- 
sylvania, and  West  Virginia.  In  Pennsylvania  the  commission  reported  that  they  had 
14  officers  shot  at  during  the  year,  7  shot,  3  of  whom  were  killed,  3  very  seriously 
wounded,  and  one  other  although  not  serving  under  a  commission  of  the  board  was 
killed  while  in  performance  of  game  protective  duty.  All  of  this  work  was  done,  so 
far  as  could  be  determined,  by  unnaturalized  foreigners.  As  a  result  of  these  condi- 
tions the  commission  recommended  the  adoption  of  a  law  similar  to  that  passed  in  New 
York  in  1905  prohibiting  aliens  from  carrying  firearms,  as  a  matter  of  greater  protection 
to  the  game  and  also  as  a  measure  of  public  safety. 

Indians. — An  invasion  of  "Wyoming  by  Indians  from  Colorado  during  the  summer 
resulted  in  serious  consequences  to  the  game.  Two  bands  of  Utes,  each  about  500 
in  number,  entered  the  State  in  the  latter  part  of  July  and  the  first  week  in  August 
and  penetrated  some  distance  northward  in  Converse,  Weston,  and  Crook  counties. 
The  Indians  were  well  armed  and  stripped  the  country  of  game  wherever  they  trav- 
eled, slaughtering  hundreds  of  sage  hens,  scores  of  antelope,  and  many  deer.  The 
game  wardens  and  local  authorities  were  utterly  powerless  to  prevent  these  depre- 
dations, and  it  was  only  by  the  aid  of  Federal  troops  that  the  Indians  were  finally 
rounded  up  and  returned  to  their  reservation. 

Tusk  hunters. — The  demand  for  elk  tusks  was  responsible,  as  in  former  years,  for 
the  destruction  of  many  elk.  In  Washington  a  few  Indians  from  the  Quinault  Reser- 
vation were  engaged  in  killing  elk  for  tusks  in  the  Olympic  Mountains,  but  through 
the  efforts  of  the  Indian  agent  the  practice  was  promptly  stopped.  On  November 
20  an  important  seizure  was  made  at  Los  Angeles,  Cal.,  of  a  carload  of  trophies,  com- 
prising the  heads,  skins,  scalps,  and  horns  of  many  elk  killed  in  Wyoming  and  on  the 
border  of  the  Yellowstone  National  Park,  and  shipped  from  Idaho  to  a  taxidermist 
in  Los  Angeles.  Two  of  the  shippers  were  arrested  while  unloading  the  car.  At  the 
preliminary  hearing  it  was  shown  that  they  belonged  to  a  party  of  four  notorious 
tusk  hunters  who  had  been  operating  in  western  Wyoming,  north  of  Jackson  Hole, 
and  along  the  southern  border  of  the  park.  In  default  of  bail  they  were  committed 
to  jail  to  await  the  action  of  the  Federal  grand  jury  in  April,  1907. 

ORGANIZATIONS    FOR   THE    PROTECTION    OF    GAME. 

The  year  1900  was  notable  in  the  concerted  efforts  made  by  game  protective  asso- 
ciations and  other  organizations.  New  State  associations  were  formed  in  Alabama, 
Idaho,  Texas,  and  West  Virginia.  In  January  the  National  Association  of  State  Com- 
missioners and  Wardens  held  a  meeting  at  St.  Paul.  Minn.,  at  which  official  repre- 
sentatives from  14  States  were  present.  This  meeting  gave  opportunity  for  conference 
and  interchange  of  views,  and  proved  an  important  factor  toward  securing  trreater 
uniformity  of  action  on  the  part  of  State  officials.  The  widespread  interest  in  bird 
protection  was  strongly  exemplified  by  a  bequest  made  to  the  National  Association 
of  Audubon  Societies  which  became  available  during  the  year  through  the  death  of 
Albert  D.  Wilcox.  Mr.  Wilcox  had  become  deeply  interested  in  the  work  of  bird 
protection  and  left  the  association  a  specific  bequest  of  -S100.000,  at  the  same  time 
giving  it  one-half  of  a  much  larger  residuary  legacy.  The  total  amount  of  the  bequest 
to  the  association  was  8322.770,  the  income  of  which  is  to  be  devoted  to  educational 
work,  promotion  of  legislation  for  the  protection  of  birds  and  game,  maintenance  of 
warden  service,  and  cooperation  with  State  officials  and  local  organizations  in  efforts 
to  secure  better  enforcement  of  laws. 

HUNTING    ACCIDENTS. 

The  number  of  persons  killed  each  year  in  hunting  accidents  is  apparently  increas- 
ing, and  the  unnecessary  loss  of  life  from  this  cause  in  1906  was  appalling.  An  effort 
was  made  by  the  Department  to  collect  reports  of  such  fatal  accidents  for  the  purpose 


GAME    PROTECTION    IX    1906.  537 

of  ascertaining  not  only  the  number  and  the  cause?,  but  also  the  possibility  of  devis- 
ing a  method  of  reducing  the  number  of  similar  accidents  in  the  future.  The  reports 
showed  that  more  than  100  persons  lost  their  lives  during  the  year,  and  of  these  at 
least  eight  were  women  and  a  dozen  or  more  children  under  15  years  of  age.  These 
accidents  occurred  in  25  State-  and  the  District  of  Columbia,  but  were  most  frequent 
in  Michigan  and  Wisconsin.  Contrary  to  expectation,  comparatively  few  were  caused 
by  persons  being  mistaken  for  deer  or  other  big  game.  Several  were  caused  by  .22- 
caliber  rifles  and  a  number  of  others  by  ordinary  shotguns. 

Many  of  the  accidents  were  due  simply  to  gross  carelessness  in  the  use  of  firearms 
such  as  pulling  a  gun  out  of  the  boat  by  the  muzzle,  or  looking  down  the  barrel  of  a 
loaded  weapon;  others  to  handling  of  firearms  by  boys  who  had  not  been  taught  or 
who  failed  to  observe  the  most  elementary  precautions.  In  a  few  instances  these 
accidents  were  attributable  directly  to  violation  of  the  game  laws.  It  is  worthy  of  note 
that  in  States  which  prohibit  the  killing  of  does,  or  of  deer  with  horns  less  than  3 
inches  in  length,  accidents  were  comparatively  few.  while  in  Michigan  and  Wisconsin, 
where  there  are  no  restrictions  of  this  kind,  more  than  the  usual  number  of  accidents 
occurred.  It  seems,  therefore,  that  certain  classes  of  accidents  may  be  reached  by 
legislation  requiring  a  hunter  to  pause  long  enough  to  make  sure  that  an  object  mov- 
ing in  the  undergrowth  is  a  deer  with  horns  of  sufficient  length  to  come  within  the 
law.  This  delay  is  oftentimes  sufficient  to  prevent  the  fatal  mistake  of  wounding  or 
killing  a  man  for  a  deer.  Legislation  providing  severe  penalties  for  shooting  pe 
by  mistake  has  not  thus  far  accomplished  the  desired  object.  Although  such  laws 
have  been  on  the  statute  books  of  Maine.  Michigan,  and  Minnesota  for  several  years. 
apparently  no  conviction  has  thus  far  been  obtained.  Action  was  begun  in  at  least 
one  case  in  each  State  this  year,  but  these  cases  are  apparently  still  pending.  The 
experience  of  the  year  seems  to  indicate  that  restrictions  on  the* use  of  the  .22  caliber 
rifle  and  the  more  general  adoption  of  measures  prohibiting  killing  deer  with  horns 
below  a  certain  limit  promise  better  results  in  preventing  accidents'than  in  declaring 
such  accidents  homicide,  punishable  by  severe  penalties. 

COXDITIOX    OF    GAME. 

Big  game. — Statistics  of  the  number  of  big  game  annually  killed  are  now  obtain- 
able from  several  States,  and  form  a  fairly  satisfactory  basis  for  estimating  increase  or 
decrease  from  year  to  year.  In  Maine  the  number  of  moose  shipped  through  Bangor 
was  185,  a  slight  falling  off  from  the  record  of  216  in  1905.  The  deer  shipments,  how- 
ever, showed  a  decrease  of  about  20  per  cent.  3.572.  as  compared  with  4.791  during  the 
previous  year.  In  Vermont  the  commissioner  reported  that  634  deer  were  killed,  an 
increase  of  about  125  over  the  number  shot  in  1905.  In  New  York  about  60  deer  were 
killed  on  Long  Island  during  the  four  days  of  open  season,  and  in  the  Adirondack?, 
notwithstanding  the  fact  that  the  season  was  shortened  a  month,  the  number  of  deer 
carried  by  the  transportation  companies  increased  about  200.  These  shipments  com- 
prised 2.413  carcasses.  108  saddles,  and  102  heads,  as  compared  with  2.196  carcasses. 
108  saddles,  and  180  heads  transported  in  1905.  In  Pennsylvania  the  number  of  deer 
killed  was  estimated  at  600  to  650.  In  Michigan  estimates  placed  the  number  cap- 
tured at  12,000.  In  Wisconsin.  Minnesota,  and  Texas  deer  were  reported  plentiful. 
In  Wyoming  the  State  warden  estimated  the  number  of  head  of  big  game  killed  at  4.798. 
Detailed  reports  showed  that  about  20  per  cent  of  this  number  .  1^011)  comprised  598 
elk.  ]  82  deer.  184  antelope,  and  47  mountain  sheep.  Reports  from  two  of  the  Canadian 
Provinces  indicated  that  99  deer  were  killed  under  license  in  Manitoba,  and  the  total 
number  killed  in  Ontario  approximated  10.000. 

Quail. — Quail  suffered  less  during  the  winter  than  in  previous  years,  but  several 
States  found  it  necessary  to  increase  their  supply  by  importing  birds  from  tbe  South 
and  West.  Most  of  these  birds  seem  to  have  done  well,  and  in  many  sections  quail  were 
reported  in  normal  abundance. 

Grouse  and  woodcock. — Ruffed  grouse  were  reported  plentiful  in  Xew  England 
(except  Vermont)  and.  in  Xew  York.  Xew  Jersey.  Pennsylvania.  Virginia.  Xorth 
Carolina.  Michigan.  Wisconsin,  and  Minnesota.  Prairie  chickens  continued  to  increase 
in  Illinois  and  Nebraska,  but  in  other  parts  of  their  range  seemed  to  be  decreasing.  In 
the  Rocky  Mountain  region,  particularly  in  Montana.  Utah,  and  Idaho,  the  grouse 
seemed  to  have  suffered  from  the  wet  spring.  In  Wyoming  and  Colorado,  however, 
sage  hens  were  reported  plentiful.  Woodcock  were  fairly  common  in  Vermont.  Con- 
necticut, and  Xew  York,  but  comparatively  scarce  in  Pennsylvania  and  the  Middle 
West. 

Wild  foul. — The  fall  flight  of  ducks  proved  a  disappointment  in  nearly  all  parts  of 
tine  country,  and  the  number  of  birds  seemed  to  be  much  less  than  in  either  1904  or 
1905.     Only  a  few  places  reported  ducks  in  their  usual  abundance.    In  some  instances, 


538  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

no  doubt,  the  apparent  decrease  was  due  to  unfavorable  weather  conditions,  which 
caused  the  birds  to  hasten  on  their  way  south  without  stopping  as  long  as  usual, 
but  whether  the  flight  of  1906  was  actually  or  apparently  much  smaller  than  those  of 
the  two  previous  years  can  only  be  determined  by  future  observations. 

GAME    FOR    PROPAGATION. 

Restocking  with  both  big  game  and  certain  game  birds  attracted  much  attention  in 
several  of  the  Eastern  States.  The  restocking  of  the  Adirondacks  with  elk,  which 
began  in  1901,  chiefly  by  private  efforts,  has  now  progressed  beyond  the  experimental 
stage.  A  number  of  animals  were  liberated  during  the  year  and  the  total  number  of 
elk  is  now  estimated  at  more  than  300.  The  effort  to  reestablish  beaver  also  progressed 
satisfactorily.  Under  the  appropriation  of  §1,000  made  by  the  legislature  several  were 
obtained  and  arrangements  were  made  to  secure  additional  animals  from  the  Yellow- 
stone National  Park.  The  total  number  in  the  State  park  now  exceeds  40.  The 
experiments  with  moose  have  not  been  so  successful,  but  an  appropriation  of  $2,150 
was  made  to  continue  the  work  in  the  hope  of  ultimately  establishing  the  species  in 
its  former  haunts.  In  Xew  Jersey  the  deer  liberated  in  former  years  have  increased 
steadily,  and  are  now  found  in  at  least  one-half  the  counties  of  the  State.  Only  8 
additional  animals  were  liberated  during  the  year.  In  addition  to  the  deer  60  rabbits 
and  50  Canadian  hares  were  distributed  in  various  parts  of  the  State.  In  Pennsylva- 
nia 30  female  deer  were  purchased  by  the  game  commission  for  stocking  the  State  game 
preserve.  The  State  warden  of  Tennessee,  through  private  subscription,  pure! 
a  herd  of  about  400  deer  belonging  to  the  Belle  Meade  Farm  and  liberated  them  in  the 
vicinity  of  Nashville.  Under  the  provision  of  the  State  law  affording  complete  pro- 
tection for  two  years,  it  is  hoped  that  these  deer  may  be  able  to  establish  themselves 
and  form  a  nucleus  for  restocking  other  sections  of  the  State. 

Owing  to  the  severity  of  previous  winters,  quail  were  in  great  demand  for  restocking 
depleted  covers,  particularly  in  Massachusetts.  New  Jersey,  Pennsylvania,  Maryland. 
Indiana,  and  Illinois.  The  demand  was  greatly  in  excess  of  the  supply,  and  several 
of  the  States  tailed  to  Becure  birds  in  adequate  numbers.  The  Massachusetts  Fish  and 
Game  Protective  Association,  however,  liberated  4.41(i;  the  fish  and  game  commission 
of  Xew  Jersey  7. 208.  the  game  commission  of  Pennsylvania  about  3,700,  and  the  game 
commissioner  of  Illinois  secured  several  thousand.  Most  of  these  birds  were  trapped 
in  Alabama  and  the  Southwest,  and  the  manner  of  their  capture  caused  much  criticism 
by  residents  in  the  States  where  the  trapping  was  done,  and  some  complaints  on  the 
pan  .  if  consignees.  More  than  60,000  birds  were  shipped  from  a  few  points  in  Alabama, 
where  the  birds  were  trapped  in  such  wholesale  numbers  as  to  deplete  the  local  stock, 
and  were  shipped  without  the  attention  to  details  necessary  to  insure  their  safe  arrival. 
In  consequence  an  undue  proportion  of  the  birds  perished  in  transit  or  died  soon  after 
arrival.  In  Texas  the  wholesale  trapping  led  to  several  arrests  and  the  imprisonment 
for  several  weeks  of  thr<  >eof  the  principal  trappers.  Attempts  to  secure  a  supply  of  birds 
from  Mexico  met  with  indifferent  success.  The  important  experiment  inaugurated  by 
the  game  commissioner  of  Illinois  in  1905  of  establishing  a  State  game  propagating  farm 
made  substantial  progress.  One  hundred  and  sixty  acres  of  land  have  been  leased  23 
miles  south  of  Springfield.  111.,  where  pheasants,  quail,  and  other  birds  are  raised  in 
large  numbers  for  distribution  in  the  State.  In  .Tidy.  1906.  the  commissioner  reported 
that  3.000  healthy  pheasant  chicks  had  been  hatched  from  a  consignment  of  5.500 
eggs  imported  from  England,  and  there  were  then  on  the  farm  about  8.000  young 
English  and  ring-necked  pheasants  besides  a  number  of  blue  quail,  a  few  wild  tur- 
keys, and  prairie  chickens. 

Experiments  in  rearing  quail  in  captivity  were  made  by  a  number  of  individuals. 
In  some  cases,  particularly  in  Kansas  and  Oregon,  a  number  of  birds  were  reared,  but 
elsewhere  failures  were  frequent.  The  American  Breeders'  Association  appointed  a 
special  committee  on  breeding  wild  birds  for  the  purpose  of  coordinating  the  efforts 
now  being  made  by  individuals  and  State  authorities  to  encourage  the  propagation  of 
game  birds.  This  same  line  of  work  received  recognition  from  the  Carnegie  Institu- 
tion, of  Washington,  which  made  a  grant  of  $500  to  Prof.  C.  F.  Hodge,  of  Clark  Univer- 
sity, Massachusetts,  to  enable  him  to  continue  his  experiments  in  propagating  ruffed 
grouse  and  other  game  birds  in  captivity. 

IMPORTATIONS    OF   LIVE    ANIMALS    AND    BIRDS. 

During  the  calendar  year  489  mammals.  381,324  birds,  and  5,604  eggs  of  s:amo  birds 
were  imported  into  the  United  States  under  permit.  Among  the  mammals  were  3 
beaver  and  234  squirrels;  and  of  the  birds  326,990  were  canaries,  9,774  game  birds,  and 
14.500  miscellaneous  species.     In  comparison  with  the  importations  of  1905  these 


GAME    PROTECTION    IN    1906.  539 

figures  show  a  decrease  of  about  800  mammals  and  increases  of  about  65,000  birds  and 
3,271  eggs.  Among  the  game  birds  were  3,772  pheasants,  2,644  partridges,  113  caper- 
cailzie, 122  black  game,  28  willow  grouse,  19  hazel  grouse,  2,359  quail,  340  ducks,  and 
377  miscellaneous  birds.  Among  the  rarer  game  birds  were  4  Manchurian,  4  black- 
backed  kalege,  3  Setchuan,  3  Mongolian,  and  12  Prince  of  Wales  pheasants,  4  brush 
turkeys,  and  4  rufous  tinamous.  The  Mongolian  and  Prince  of  Wales  pheasants  com- 
prised the  second  importation  of  these  species  ever  brought  to  the  United  States. 
Among  the  rarer  miscellaneous  birds  worthy  of  mention  were  4  keas,  6  weka  rails,  and 
4  kiwis  from  New  Zealand,  6  black-footed  penguins,  and  49  shama  thrashes.  The 
opening  of  the  new  bird  house  of  the  New  York  Zoological  Society  was  occasion  for 
the  importation  of  a  large  number  of  European  birds  and  a  number  of  rare  species  from 
other  parts  of  the  world. 

The  most  notable  features  of  the  importations  of  game  birds  were  the  unusually 
large  number  of  European  partridges  brought  over  in  the  attempt  to  introduce  the 
species  in  several  localities,  the  importation  of  5,500  eggs  of  pheasants  by  the  State 
game  commissioner  of  Illinois  for  propagation  on  the  State  farm  near  Springfield,  and 
the  continued  imports  of  capercailzie  and  black  game.  In  the  consignment  of  pheasant 
eggs  only  18  were  broken  in  transit  and  unpacking,  1,809  proved  unfertile,  and  over 
3,000  healthy  chicks  were  hatched,  Capercailzie  and  black  game  have  been  imported 
in  steadily  increasing  numbers  during  the  past  four  years.  In  1903,  65  capercailzie 
were  imported  for  the  Algonquin  Park  in  Ontario;  in  1904  about  100  capercailzie 
and  25  black  game  were  liberated  on  the  preserve  of  the  Cleveland  Cliffs  Iron  Company, 
on  Grand  Island,  Mich. ;  and  in  1905, 117  capercailzie  and  74  black  game  were  imported, 
many  of  them  intended  for  the  same  preserve.  In  1906,  the  total  number  of  the  two 
species  imported  increased  to  235,  and  these  birds  were  consigned  chiefly  to  preserves 
in  the  Adirondacks.  In  addition  to  the  birds  br<  night  to  the  United  States,  22  capercail- 
zie and  35  black  game,  imported  direct  from  Copenhagen  to  British  Columbia,  were 
liberated  at  various  points  in  that  province.  Seventy-six  birds  were  purchased  in 
Copenhagen  and  74  reached  Vancouver  safely  in  October,  but  17  died  from  the  effects  of 
the  long  journey.  Of  the  57  surviving  the  trip,  22  were  capercailzie  and  35  were  black 
game.  Of  these,  19  black  game  were  liberated  on  Vancouver  Island,  16  black  game 
near  Nicomen.  on  the  Fraser  River,  and  8  capercailzie  on  the  North  Arm  of  Burrard 
Inlet,  14  miles  from  Vancouver.  The  total  cost  of  the  experiment  was  $1,695.  The 
black  game  have  apparently  not  done  as  well  as  the  capercailzie,  but  it  is  hoped  that 
the  latter  species  at  least  will  ultimately  become  acclimated. 

So  far  as  known,  no  injurious  species  were  introduced  into  the  United  States,  but 
the  English  sparrow,  still  extending  its  range  in  the  Southwest,  was  reported  for  the 
first  time  from  Southern  California  at  Newhall,  in  Los  Angeles  County. a 

PRIVATE    AND    STATE    PRESERVES. 

The  private  preserve  promises  to  become  the  most  satisfactory  means  of  providing 
good  hunting  and  at  the  same  time  one  of  the  most  effective  means  of  preserving  and 
increasing  the  supply  of  game  in  the  region  in  which  it  is  situated.  Private  preserves 
owned  or  leased  by  individuals  or  associations  continue  to  be  established  wherever 
conditions  are  favorable  and  suitable  land  can  be  obtained.  Statistics  of  the  indi- 
vidual preserves  created  in  1906  are  incomplete,  but  reports  show  that  such  preserves 
were  established  in  at  least  20  different  States. 

In  North  Carolina  the  Audobon  Society  purchased  Royal  Shoal  Islands  and  the 
islands  known  as  the  Legged  Lump,  in  Pamlico  Sound,  as  a  refuge  and  breeding 
ground  for  gulls  and  terns. 

In  Pennsylvania  definite  and  satisfactory  progress  was  made  in  the  creation  of  State 
game  preserves  under  the  provisions  of  the  act  of  1905.  Three  parks,  each  containing 
from  3,000  to  4,000  acres,  were  located  in  the  forest  reserves  in  Clearfield,  Clinton,  and 
Franklin  counties.  Each  park  is  to  be  surrounded  by  a  fire  line  or  path  8  to  10  feet 
in  width,  and  along  this  path  a  single  wire  is  stretched  from  tree  to  tree,  on  which  are 
fastened  notices  calling  attention  to  the  purposes  of  the  inclosure  and  prohibiting 
trespass  within  its  limits  for  any  purpose.  The  work  on  the  preserves  in  Clearfield 
and  Clinton  counties  was  completed,  and  the  corners  of  the  preserve  in  Franklin  County 
were  located  and  the  cutting  of  the  fire  line  begun. 

Reference  should  be  made  also  to  two  provincial  game  preserves  established  in 
Canada.  One  of  these,  comprising  16  sections,  was  set  apart  in  Alberta,  about  30 
miles  northeast,  of  Edmonton;  the  other,  known  as  the  Gaspesian  Preserve,  was  estab- 
lished by  the  Province  of  Quebec,  on  the  Gaspe  Peninsula.  The  latter  preserve  com- 
prises about  2,500  square  miles,  and  is  comparable  with  the  largest  preserves  on  the 

"Condor,  IX,  p.  28,  1907. 


540  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF   AGRICULTURE. 

continent,  such  as  the  Laurentides  National  Park  in  Quebec,  the  Algonquin  Park  in 
Ontario,  the  Canadian  National  Park  in  Alberta,  and  the  Yellowstone  National  Park. 

NATIONAL    PARKS,   REFUGES,   AND    RESERVATIONS. 

More  progress  was  made  in  the  establishment  of  refuges  for  birds  and  game  than 
during  any  previous  year.  By  Executive  order  dated  February  10,  1906,  Indian  Key, 
an  island  of  90  acres  at  the  mouth  of  Tampa  Bay,  Florida,  was  set  aside  under  the 
charge  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture  as  a  preserve  and  breeding  ground  for  native 
birds.  An  item  of  $15,000  included  in  the  agricultural  bill  provided  for  erecting  a 
fence  for  a  buffalo  inclosure  on  the  Wichita  Game  Reserve  in  Oklahoma.  The  con- 
tract has  been  let,  and  the  work  of  constructing  the  fence  is  now  in  progress.  Congress 
authorized  the  lease  of  a  tract  of  not  more  than  3,500  acres  of  public  land  in  Stanley 
County,  near  Pierre,  S.  Dak.,  for  the  benefit  of  the  Phillips  herd  of  buffalo,  and  on 
June  29  authorized  the  establishment  of  a  second  game  refuge  in  the  Grand  Canyon 
National  Forest,  in  northern  Arizona.  This  game  refuge,  as  created  by  proclamation  of 
November  28,  comprises  2,267,300  acres.  In  this  connection  may  also  be  mentioned 
the  act  of  June  30  prohibiting  upland  hunting  in  the  District  of  Columbia,  which 
practically  renders  the  District  a  game  and  bird  refuge. 

Reports  from  all  of  the  preserves  previously  established  showed  satisfactory  progress. 
The  results  were  especially  noteworthy  on  the  Pelican  Island  Reservation,  in  Florida, 
and  on  the  Breton  Island  Reservation,  off  the  mouth  of  the  Mississippi  River.  On 
Pelican  Island  nesting  began  unusually  early,  600  nests  having  been  constructed  by 
November  18,  1905,  and  many  young  hatched  before  the  close  of  the  year.  In  Feb- 
ruary, during  a  period  of  cold  and  inclement  weather,  600  or  700  of  the  young  birds 
perished,  but  about  150  young  survived.  On  April  15  the  old  birds  again  began  to 
nest,  and  succeeded  in  raising  about  400  young,  so  that  the  total  number  of  birds  reared 
on  the  island  exceeded  that  of  any  previous  year  since  the  reservation  was  established. 
The  Breton  Island  Reservation  comprises  some  8  islands,  and  near  by,  along  the  Lou- 
isiana coast,  are  17  islands  included  in  the  Audubon  Reservation,  the  latter  controlled 
and  maintained  by  the  State  Audubon  Society  of  Louisiana.  These  two  reservations 
together  make  up  one  of  the  greatest  sea-bird  breeding  areas  in  the  world.  Here  an 
immense  number  of  laughing  gulls,  Forster  terns,  black  skimmers,  and  royal  terns 
were  raised,  estimated  at  100,000  in  all.  The  severe  hurricane  which  passed  over  the 
reservations  in  September  killed  some  of  the  birds,  and  materially  changed  the  con- 
ditions on  certain  of  the  islands.  Grand  Cochere,  one  of  the  best  breeding  grounds, 
was  reported  submerged  and  waves  broke  over  Breton  Island,  carrying  away  the  house 
of  refuge,  but  at  the  same  time  causing  the  destruction  of  the  raccoons  and  other 
animals  which  infested  the  island  and  interfered  with  the  nesting  of  the  birds. 

In  the  Yellowstone  National  Park,  as  shown  by  the  report  of  the  superintendent, 
the  buffalo  herd  has  steadily  increased  from  the  2  bulls  and  18  cows  purchased  in  1902 
until  it  now  numbers  57.  Arrangements  were  completed  during  the  summer  for 
moving  all  the  young  buffalo  of  this  herd  to  the  mouth  of  the  Lamar  River,  at  the 
mouth  of  Rose  Creek,  where  hay  will  be  raised  and  the  animals  gradually  turned  loose 
under  conditions  where  they  can  readily  obtain  feed  at  all  times.  The  old  buffalo 
will  be  kept  as  heretofore  at  Mammoth  Hot  Springs,  and  this  division  of  the  herd  will 
act  as  a  safeguard  against  the  spread  of  disease  which  might  break  out  in  either  hand. 
About  1,500  antelope  came  down  to  the  feeding  grounds  near  the  haystacks  in  the 
vicinity  of  Gardiner,  and  at  the  same  point  1,200  elk  were  seen  and  counted  one 
evening  during  the  latter  part  of  the  winter.  In  spite  of  the  heavy  fall  of  snow,  the 
percentage  of  loss  of  big  game  was  very  small,  and  the  animals  came  through  the  season 
in  good  condition. 


FARMERS      INSTITUTES. 


541 


FARMERS'  INSTITUTES. 

Farmers'  institutes  were  held  during  the  year  ended  June  30,  1906,  in  all  of  the 
States  and  Territories  excepting  Alaska,  Florida,  Nevada,  New  Mexico,  and  Wash- 
ington.    The  following  table  gives  a  summary  of  the  work  for  the  year: 

Statistics  of  farmers'  institutes  for  season  ended  June  30,  1906. 


Meetings. 

Total 
attend- 
ance. 

Speak- 
ers on 
State 
force. 

Funds  for  institutes.     RX,dtingsPr0- 

State  or 

Territory. 

Total 
num- 
ber. 

One 
day. 

Two 
days 

or 
more. 

Num- 
ber of 

ses- 
sions. 

Appropri- 
ated for 
year ended 
June  30, 
1906. 

Appropri- 
ated for 

rear ended 

June  30, 

1907. 

Pub- 
lished. 

Num- 
ber of 
copies. 

35 

21 

31 

83 

40 

24 

IS 

21 

4 

21 

103 

250 

00 

155 

25 

22 

50 

49 

125 

335 

105 

110 

27 
21 
28 
55 
24 
24 
18 
17 
4 
5 

118 

12S 
1 
22 
50 
37 

125 

259 
98 

108 

8 

3 

28 
16 

4 
8 
10 
108 
132 
69 
27 
24 

12 

76 
7 
2 

85 

21 

42 

272 

123 

83 

40 

42 

8 

105 

667 

918 

402 

522 

122 

44 

102 

125 

153 

934 

238 

220 

8,590 

1,307 

7,150 

22,801 

16,675 

4,895 

7,200 

4,500 

300 

7,875 

79,428 

129,894 

66,959 

27,300 

13 

3 

6 

37 

23 

60 

11 

34 

9 

13 

109 

46 

5 

21 

S600. 00 

608. 85 

400. 00 

9,000.  CO 

4,000.00 

1,S25.00 

725.00 

2,500.00 

33.  45 

1,000.00 

30,281.55 

12,500.00 

8,096.06 

2,000.00 

1,750.00 

2,000.00 

5,000.00 

6,000.00 

3,000.00 

15,000.00 

20,238.40 

3,000.00 

S600.00 

No.... 

No 

No. . . . 

6,000.00 

Yes . . . 
Yes... 
No 

12,500 

10,000 

600.00 
2,500.00 

"*i,"666.'66' 

17,150.00 

10,000.00 
7,425.00 
2,500.00 

15,000.00 
2,000.00 
5,0(10.00 
6,000.00 
3,000.00 
7,500.00 

18,000.00 
3,000.00 

Yes... 
No 

5,000 

Georgia 

Yes... 
No. . . . 

1,000 

Yes... 
No. . . . 

20,000 

No. . . . 

Kentucky 

Louisiana 

2,657 
6,967 
10,762 
19, 125 
122,573 
51,211 
10,000 

20 
27 

8 
69 
42 
105 
21 

Yes... 

2,500 

Maryland 

Massachusetts 

Yes... 
Yes... 
Yes... 
No.... 

15,000 
9,500 

Minnesota 

Mississippi 

35,000 

71 

1G0 
10 
40 

259 
90 
43 

245 
31 
44 

220 
1 
1 
54 
59 
35 
27 
45 
3S 

til 
71 
15 
33 
111 
95 
17 

2 

40 
63 

1 

54 
17 
5 
25 
40 
38 

7 

89 

1 

7 

115 

1 

26 

245 

29 

4 

163 

1 

42 

30 

2 

5 

133 

515 

34 

116 

1.062 

195 

162 

1,225 

149 

109 

987 

1 

2 

74 

119 

68 

35 

73 

76 

65 

224 

243 

64 

7,890 

72,894 

3,000 

11,611 

134,989 

25, 950 

20,310 

81,816 

7,460 

10,350 

165,553 

50 

300 

11,149 

10,000 

6,000 

4,500 

6,680 

7,962 

19,500 

4,4S0 

32,200 

3,401 

25 

38 

12 

14 

64 

21 

47 

27 

9 

8 

56 

3 

4 

15 

14 

11 

39 

17 

■1(< 

11 

29 

24 

1 

5,000.00 
8,607.00 
2,100.00 
3,000.00 

20,000.00 
5,500.00 
6,379.07 

17,629.89 

660.00 

2,500.00 

20,500.00 

4,000.00 
6,000.00 
1,600.00 
3,000.00 

20,000.00 
3,500.00 
6,000.00 

22,000.00 

Ves... 
No. . . . 

5,000 

New  Hampshire.. 

New  Jersey 

New  York 

North  Carolina... 

North  Dakota 

Ohio 

Yes... 
No 

2,000 

Yes... 
Yes... 
Yes... 
Yes... 

No.... 

15,000 
30,000 
10,000 
15,000 

2,500.00 
20,500.00 

No. . . . 

Pennsylvania 

Yes... 
No 

50,000 

10C. 00 
4,524.40 
6,500.00 
2,500.00 

540. 00 
2,000.00 
5,000.00 
5,000.00 
3,966.12 
2,000.00 
1,107.59 

Yes... 
No. . . . 

2,000 

5,000.00 
5,000.00 
2,500.00 

South  Dakota 

Tennessee 

Yes... 
Yes.. . 
No. . . . 

COO 
5,000 

Utah 

1,500.00 

Yes... 

Yi'S. . . 
No.... 

7,000 

3,000 

5,000.00 

4,000.00 

12,000.00 

1,000.00 

West  Virginia 

Wisconsin 

Wyoming 

81 
81 
11 

.50 

81 

4 

31 

7 

Yes... 

Yes... 
No 

60,000 

Total 

3,365    1,998 

1,367    10,999 

1,262,272 

1,197 

264,672.38 

232,375.00 

315, 100 

a  No  report  received. 


■-- 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMENT    OF    AGBICULTUEE. 


STATISTICS  OF  TEE  PRIXCTPAX  CROPS. 

3 sis.] 

CORN. 

Cm  ■  •?. 

: 


1<<C. 

1904. 

-     '     

-       . 

Bui 
2.2-44   . 

- 

1.000 

Lui l 
.  '  '  :<<4.000 



''COOO 

...  ■  .  -  _        -  .  .-.-■- 

_ 

_-::       :■::.:    : 


■ 

am 


7    -    .  -     .;:...::.•-:■;... 


" 
■  1,477  1.00 

5,289,000  5.000  4.41i 


" 


raiy: 



Hni.:-  



BOSZL. 

-Hna- 


-.000 

- 

•,.000 


- 

15,255 

'    ■ 


"   ,.000 

-    - 
■ . : . ooo 


12    •_ 

-    " 


7.v-     ... 
Italy 

r.  -.    . 


. 


-' 

•     272      I 


. 


QafN   <  .'  G       -  B  -•:•■  .... 


'. 
2.00      " 


- 


■ 
LLASIA. 


-    •-       M 


- 


- 





" 


- 


'      ' 


/ 


' 


' 


:  . 


r.000         139. 304.  COO 


24 




" 

s 

i 

- 

".•'..000 

' 

"    - 

a 

10.:;. 

11.' 

Total  Rb: 



- 

i     '  . 

- 

-.ol.OOO 



Hpnfn 

000 

-■  -'. 

~"-.000 

i 

- 
- 

21.431.000 

■""J.OOO 

- 


000  -  - 

3,4»0, 000 

30.000.000 
.   -  000  -J.  000 


74 


777,000  j  3,1 1; 


- 


STATISTICS    OF    COEN.  543 

Acreage,  production,  value,  prices,  ami  exports  of  corn  of  the  United  States,  1866-1906. 


Aver- 

Aver- 
age 
farm 

Chicago  cash  price  per 
bushel,  No.  2. 

Domestic 
exports, 
including 

Year. 

Acreage. 

yield 

Production. 

price 
"per 

Farm  value. 
Dec.  1. 

December. 

May  of 

following 

com  meal, 

fiscal 

bush- 

year. 

vea  r  be- 

Dec.  1. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

July  1. 

.1  cres. 

Bush. 

Bushels. 

Cents. 

Dollars. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

Bushels. 

34,306.538 

25.3 

867,946.295 

47.4 

411,450.830 

53 

62 

64 

79 

16,026,947 

32,520,249 

320,000 

57.0 

137,769,763 

61 

65 

61 

71 

12,493,522 

ISBN 

37,246 

26.0 

906,527.  (XX) 

46.8 

424,056.649 

38 

58 

14 

51 

8,286,665 

37,103,245 

23.6 

N  4. 320, 000 

59.8 

522,550,509 

56 

67 

73 

85 

2,14 

187 

38,646,977 

2S.3 

1,094,255,000 

49.4 

540, 52 

41 

59 

46 

52 

10,676,S73 

1871 

34,091.137 

29.1 

991.S98.000 

43.4 

430,355,910 

36 

39 

38 

43 

35, 727, 010 

18*2 

35,526,836 

30.8 

1,092,719,000 

35.3 

3s3.736.210 

27 

28 

34 

39 

40, 154. 374 

1873 

39,197,148 

23. 8 

932,274,000 

44.2 

111,961,151 

40 

49 

49 

59 

35, '> 

1874 

41,036,918 

850,148,500 

58.4 

496,271,255 

64 

76 

53 

67 

30, 025, 036 

1ST.", 

44.841.371 

29.5 

1.321,069,000 

J 

484,674,804 

40 

47 

41 

45 

50,910,532 

1876 

49,033,364 

26.2 

1,283,827,500 

34.0 

436.108,521 

40 

43 

43 

56 

72,652,611 

1877 

50,369,113 

26.7 

1,342,558,000 

34.8 

467,63.5,230 

41 

49 

35 

41 

87,192.110 

1878 

51,585,000 

26.9 

218,750 

31.7 

440,280,517 

30 

32 

33 

36 

87,884,892 

1879 

85,450 

29.2 

1,547,901,790 

37. 5 

580,4- 

39 

43  } 

32? 

364 

99,572.320 

62,31' 

27.6 

1.717.434.543 

39.6 

679,714,499 

35 1 

42 

114 

45 

93,648.147 

1881 

64,262,025 

18.6 

1.194.916.000 

63.6 

.^2,170 

53| 

63} 

69 

76} 

44, 340. 683 

1882 

65.6" 

24.6 

1.617.025,100 

48.5 

•   7.175 

491 

61 

.53} 

56f 

41,655.653 

1883 

68,301 

22.7 

1,551,066,895 

42.4 

51,485 

54  J 

63} 

524 

.57 

46. 258, 606 

1884 

25.8 

1,796,528,432 

35.7 

640,7 

34  J 

40} 

44f 

49 

52.-" 

1885 

73. 130. 150 

26, 5 

1,936,176.000 

_    • 

635.674,630 

36 

■i-i 

34} 

36| 

64, 829, 617 

75,694,208 

22.0 

1,665,441,000 

36.6 

610,311,000 

3.5  J 

3S 

36+ 

39i 

41,  0 

1887 

72,392,720 

2D.1 

1,456,161,000 

44.4 

646, 106, 770 

47 

5'i 

54 

60 

25.360,869 

188S 

75.6.. 

26.3 

1,987,790.000 

34.1 

677.. 56 1,580 

334 

35| 

■•m 

35* 

70.841.073 

1889 

78,319,061 

27.0 

2.112.^92,000 

28.3 

597,918,829 

29* 

35 

32| 

35 

103. 41 8.  709 

1«90 

71,97 

2.1.7 

1. 4 f 9. 970, 000 

50.6 

754,433,451 

47? 

53 

55 

694 

32.041,529 

1891 

76,204.515 

27.0 

2, 080, 154, 000 

40.6 

835,439,228 

39* 

59 

40} 

olOO 

76. 002, 285 

1892 

"      26,668 

23. 1 

164.000 

39.4 

642,146,630 

40 

m 

36J 

39* 

444 

47.121.S94 

1893 

72      16,465 

22.5 

1.619,496,131 

36.5 

591.62.3.62". 

34} 

36J 

3S4 

66,489,529 

1894 

-.269 

19.4 

1,212,770,052 

45.7 

.354.719.162 

44| 

47* 

471 

554 

28, "  - 

1895 

"..830 

26. 2 

2,151.138.580 

25.3 

544.985.534 

25 

26] 

274 

294 

101, 100, 375 

1896 

81,027,156 

2^.2 

2,283,875,165 

21.5 

191.006,967 

23f 

23 

234 

178,S17.417 

1*7 

£0. 095. 051 

23.8 

1.902,907,933 

20.3 

501,072,952 

25 

27  V 

32? 

37 

2:2.055.543 

1898 

77,721,781 

24.8 

1,924,184,660 

28.7 

552.023,428 

33} 

38 

32} 

31a 

177.2.55,046 

1S99 

82,li 

25.3 

43, 933 

30.3 

629,210,110 

30 

3U 

36 

404 

213.123.412 

1900 

83. 320,  872 

25.3 

2,105,102,516 

35.7 

751,220,034 

35} 

40} 

42| 

58J 

181,405,473 

1901 

91,349,928 

16.7 

1,522,519,891 

60.5 

921,5.55,768 

62* 

67* 

50I 

64  J 

28. 02 

1902 

94.043.613 

26.8 

••iS.312 

40.3 

1.017,017.349 

43J 

57} 

44 

46 

70.039,261 

1903 

88,091,993 

25.5 

2,244,176,925 

12.5 

968,801 

41 

434 

47} 

50 

222,061 

1904 

92.231,581 

26.8 

180,934 

44.1 

1,087,461,440 

43i 

49 

4S 

644 

90,293,483 

190.3 

94,011,369 

28.8 

J.  (07,993,540 

41.2 

1,116,696,738 

12 

50i 

474 

50 

119,893,833 

1906 

96,7". 

30.3 

_       "  416,091 

39.9 

1,166,626,479 

40 

46 

a  Coincident  with  "corner." 


Visible  supply  of  corn  in  the  United  States  and  Canada,  first  of  each  month  for  tenyears.a 


Month. 


Bushels. 

Julv 21, 501, 000 

August 20, 01S.  000 

September '  37. 528. 000 

October >  45. 412, 000 

November >  52. 9S0. 000 

December 49. 559, 000 

January I  4S.  292. 000 

February 1  53, 522. 000 

Ma rch . .". 52. 457. 000 

April 52. 228. 000 

May ;  34. 734. 000 

Jurie >  28. 288. 000 


a  Those  figures  represent  stocks  available  at  62  of  the  principal  points  of  accumulation  east  of  the 
Rocky  Mountains,  stocks  in  Manitoba  elevators,  and  stocks  afloat  on  lakes  and  canals,  as  reported  by 
Bradstreet's. 


544  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

le  supply  of  corn  in  the  United  States  and  Canada,  etc. — Continued. 


:•-:-■■. 


1903-i. 


1904-5. 


1905-6. 


1906-7. 


July 

September 
October. . . 
November 
December. 

February . 

March 

April 

May 

June 


Bushels. 

9, 013. 000 
3,  823, 000 

4.607,000 

22 

-   552 

i 

11,. 53-5. 000 

15,180,000 

16,901,000 

7,039,000 


Bushels. 
13,410,000 

■ 
■ 
12.147.000 
! 

16,669,000 

: 

72 


Bushels. 

_      - 

8.  014. 000 
10,703.000 

5,119,000 

: 
15.351.000 

\ 
16. 752. 000 

! 


Bushels. 
9,571,000 
10.101,000 
8,080,000 

5.183,000 
10. 230. 000 
17.830,000 
22.010,000 
24.531.000 
17,653.000 
7. 074. 000 
7,366,000 


Bushels. 

i 

5, 133.  000 
8,404,000 
14,097,000 

_  •_"  00 
17.011.000 


Acreage,  production,  value,  and  distribution  of  can  United  States  in  1906,  by 

States. 


r  Territory. 

Crop  of  1906. 

Stock  in  farmers'  hands 

Shipped  out 
of  county 

Acr     g 

Production. 

\  alue. 

where  grown. 

Acres. 

Bushels. 

Dollars. 

Bui'- 

Per  cent. 

Bushels. 

12.350 

450.950 

-   - 

■       - 

19 

4,570 

New  Hampshire 

.     .   i 

;     --- 

2 

25 

0 

56.491 
44. 799 

2.005.430 
1,778  '. 

1.183.204 
1,067,112 

501.358 
515.771 

25 

29 

0 

0 

Rhode  Island 

10.011 

331.364 

212.073 

_ 

34 

3.314 

55.595 

2.22-3.800 

1,334,280 

. 

29 

22.238 

050.000 

277.749 

_-     -o.OOO 
10.(-_   _ 

13.384. 150 
5.343.613 

3       9.750 
,  -A. 561 

35 

42 

453.700 

1.512.343 

Pennsylvania 

1,44 

57.900.239 

30. 139. 324 

-      -2.108 

45 

4.057,217 

196,  472 

a  -  • 

"   394, 160 

22.0  '   325 

2.475.-547 
9.903.521 

2,943 

io.  -a    n 

50 

47 

2.357.664 

Maryland 

6,162,191 

Virginia 

1,85 

45.1--    52 

24,85       -- 

19.882.9.50 

44 

4,061       : 

:rginia 

750.000 

22.725.000 

12.  -: 

-i.OOO 

36 

1.130.250 

North  Carolina 

2,731   •- 

41,7 

_     E1.855 

18,39 

44 

1.2.53.905 

South  Carolina 

1,935 

.       11.233 

'   -.0.200 

11,093   - 

47 

472.225 

Georgia 

4,33* 

52. 0       " 

34.-- 

24.471.300 

47 

1.501.998 

25 

3.325.000 
782 

-"5.000 

141.645.000 

-      ■       767 

4. 262,  .500 

55.241.550 

201,756 

2.543.750 

GO.  907. 350 

113,257 

37 
43 
44 

-   "" 



Ohio    

41.077.050 

Indiana 

- 

•- 

347. 1 

124,981,051 

41.401 

48 

142. 3-39.  530 

1.475.000 

54.575.000 

24.013.000 

_     -  -0.000 

40 

3.274.500 

Wisconsin 

■-    n 

60. 105. 732 

43.350 

23,441,235 

39 

1,803,172 

Minnesota 

1,492  ' 

50.1:     277 

17.050.754 

18.053.740 

36 

6.017.913 

15  i.OOO 

373.275.000 

119,44$ 

.4.750 

49 

97.051.500 

7.075.000 
150.000 

._•   522,500 
4.170.000 

-     538, 550 

-■..300 

-   _    •     75 
1. 042.500 

43 

25 

29.707.925 

1 

• 

South  Dako: 

1.875.000 

12.500 

18,215     25 

32.034.375 

51 

12.  .5*2.  .500 



'     .5.000 

.       782   - 

72.430.925 

-  6, 000 

48 

122. 393.  425 

Kansas 

".i.OOO 

195.075.000 

62.424.000 

79.250 

39 

'     '71.750 



■5.072 

105. 437. 370 

44. 283. 098 

47.4' 

45 

12. 652.  485 



75   3  . 

86. 4.  -       . 

40.021.589 

39.757.300 

46 

12. 904.  337 

Vlabama 

10,587 

"   149,392 

30.623.011 

21.  532.  220 

45 

956.988 

ppi 

2,204,822 

40.789.207 

24.-- 

17.947.251 

44 

315,784 

Louisiana 

1,52 

_     217,633 

15. 730. 580 

9.1"       72 

35 

202. 176 

Texas 

J4.657 

155.-    1,782 

•r2.391 

50.0-     "_. 

36 

6.232.191 

Indian  Territory 

.        -    - 

193,264 

21.917.844 

i  S2, 104 

43 

23. 972. 042 

Oklahoma 

1,998 

737,326 

19.721.198 

30. 896,  .543 

47 

21.035.944 

-S 

2. 2- :      " 

-   ->2.569 

24  -17.207 

23.7- 

45 

1,584.077 

Montana 

3.980 

93.132 

60.536 

13.970 

15 

0 

Wyoming 

-   --- 

-   25 

40.271 

13. 051 

20 

0 

lo 

113.159 

3.157.136 

1.578.568 



24 

189.428 

.  loco 

40.211 

1.182.203 

851,186 

295. 5-51 

25 

59.110 

Arizona 

3       - 

220.129 

187.110 

66.039 

30 

2.201 

11.126 
5.231 

356.032 

263.464 
32 

71.200 
29.007 

20 
20 

3.560 



Idaho 

0 

Washington 

11.444 

158, 614 

43.258 

15 

S.G52 

Oregon 

• 

499.091 

324.409 

59.801 

12 

4.991 

California- 

.57. 15S 

1,9 

1 .  330. 525 

339.118 

17 

259. 326 

Unit'vl  States 

7.581 

.    -.-.410.091 

.      13 

'78,958 

44.3 

079.543,770 

STATISTICS    OF    CORN.  545 

Average  yield  per  acre  of  com  in  the  United  States,  1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 

1897. 

1898. 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

Bush. 
37.0 
34.0 
35.0 
32.5 
31.0 
31.5 
31.0 
31.5 
36.0 
29.0 
33.0 
18.0 
24.5 
13.0 

9.0 
11.0 

8.0 
32.5 
30.0 
32.5 
31.5 
33.0 
26.0 
29.0 
26.0 
17.0 
24.0 
30.0 
18.0 
23.0 
21.0 
12.0 
14.5 
17.0 
18.5 

Bush. 
40.0 
41.0 
43.0 
40.0 
34.0 
37.0 
33.0 
37.0 
37.0 
25.0 
31.0 
22.0 
29.0 
14  0 
10.0 
9.0 
9.0 
37.0 
36.0 
30.0 
34  0 
35.0 
32.0 
35.0 
26.0 
19.0 
28.0 
21.0 
16.  0 
31.0 
26.0 
15.0 
18.0 
18.0 
25.0 

Bush. 
36.0 
39.0 
36.  0 
36.0 
31.0 
39.0 
31.0 
39.0 
32.0 
22.0 
32.0 
20.0 
20.0 
13.0 
9.0 
10.0 
10.0 
36.0 
38.0 
36.0 
25.0 
35.0 
33.0 
31.0 
26.0 
23.0 
26.0 
28.0 
27.0 

"  21.0 
20.0 
12.0 
16.0 
18.0 
18.0 

Bush. 
36.0 
37.0 
40.0 
38.0 
32.0 
38.0 
32.0 
33.0 
25.0 
24  0 
'26.0 
16.0 
27.0 
12.0 

7.0 
10.0 

8.0 
37.0 
38.0 
37.0 
36.0 
40.0 
33.0 
38.0 
28.0 
16.0 
27.0 
26.0 
19.0 
26.0 
20.0 
11.0 
11.0 
17.0 
18.5 

Bush. 
39.4 
3a  5 
40.0 
40.5 
32.1 
39.0 
33.0 
36.9 
35.0 
30.  G 
34  2 
22.2 
23.0 
12.0 

6.9 
10.0 

9.0 
26.1 
19.8 
21.4 
34.5 
27.4 
26.3 
25.0 
10.1 
22.6 
21.0 
14  1 

7.8 
15.6 
14  2 
10.9 
10.9 
13.7 
11.6 
12.0 

7.3 

8.1 
25.0 
39.5 
17.1 
31.6 
18.0 
19.4 
23.0 
17.5 
20.8 
31.0 

Bush. 
21.7 
23.3 
21.8 
31.3 
28.4 
31.5 
25.0 
34  5 
30.  1 
28.0 
32.4 
22.0 
26.5 
13.9 
10.4 

9.0 

8.6 
38.0 
37.9 
38.7 
26.4 
28.2 
22.8 
32.0 
39.0 
19.4 
18.9 
32.3 
29.9 
27.0 
21.9 

8.4 
11.5 
12.  5 

8.1 
24.9 
25.8 
21.3 
22.0 
19.8 
16.5 
22.0 
20.2 
20.1 
24.7 
23.0 
23.4 
30.5 

Bush. 
30.2 
21.0 
23.4 
24  0 
30.1 
22.4 
25.0 
24  0 
31.2 
27.5 
28.7 
21.8 
22.6 
14.7 
10.3 
11.7 
9.9 
29.6 
33.2 
32.2 
33.5 
29.3 
28.3 
28.0 
32.4 
25.2 
27.2 
26.0 
25.6 
26.6 
23.5 
14  8 
18.4 
20.6 
24.  2 
27.7 
23.3 
20.9 
24  1 
19.4 
19.8 
24  0 
22.4 
21.4 
34  5 
23.1 
25.8 
30.7 

Bush. 
39.7 
27.3 
35.9 
36.0 
34.1 
38.9 
27.3 
38.0 
34  0 
30.4 
33.4 
23.3 
25.3 
15.2 
12.4 
11.9 
10.7 
32.5 
31.5 
36.5 
28.6 
29.7 
26.9 
32.6 
26.2 
21.2 
28.1 
32.8 
20.9 
26.9 
25.0 
15.0 
19.1 
19.9 
22.6 
32.4 
28.1 
21.6 
22.2 
32.5 
20.5 
22.7 
23.8 
33.2 
29.3 
24  7 
28.  8 
28.6 

Bush 
34  3 
37.0 
34  7 
37.5 
32.5 
42.7 
31.5 
35.8 
38.9 
30.4 
36.9 
23.4 
29.8 
13.9 
10.9 
11.0 
10.1 
37.8 
40.7 
39.8 
34  0 
37.6 
32.5 
34  8 
33.8 
27.5 
31.8 
32.8 
27.7 
29.7 
24  6 
14  8 
14  3 
13.7 
21.3 
32.7 
25.3 
17.3 
19.4 
26.9 
23.8 
25.3 
27.0 
36.2 
27.2 
24  2 
23.0 
32.0 

Bush. 
37.  0> 

37.  5 

35.5. 

39.7 

33. 1 

40.0 

34  9 

36.3 

40.2 

30.0 

35.0 

24  3 

30.3 

15.3 

12.2 

12.0' 

11.0 

Ohio 

42.6 
39.  6 

30.  1 

37.0 

41.2 

33.  6. 

39.5. 

32.3. 

27.8 

South  Dakota 

33.5. 
34  1 

28.9 

33.0 

28.1 

16.0- 

18.5 

17.2 

22.5 
33.6 

19.0 
20.0 
23.0 
22.0 
17.0 
20.0 

26.0 
19.0 
15.0 
34  0 
19.0 
22.0 

32.9 

16.0 
18.0 
12.0 
19.0 
27.0 

20.0 
28.0 
16.0 
18.0 
21.0 

23.6 

23.4 

27.0 

Colorado 

27. 9- 

29.4 

29.5 

Utah 

22.0 

21.0 

20.0 

20.0 

32.0 

Idaho 

28.3;. 

18.0 
25.0 
31.5 

12.0 
24.0 
26.0 

23.0 
22.0 

27.0 

20.0 
23.0 
25.0 

25.2 

27.6- 

34  9 

General  average 

23.8 

24.8 

25.3 

25.3 

16.  7 

26.  8 

25.5 

26.8 

28.8 

30.  a. 

Average  value  per  acre  of  corn  in  the  United  States,  based  upon  farm  value  December  1 , 

1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Maine $17.  39 

New  Hampshire :  15.  30 

Vermont I  15.  05 

Massachusetts !  15.  28 

Rhode  Island !  16.  74 

Connecticut i  15.  43 

New  York j  12.  40 

New  Jersey j  1 1.  97 

Pennsylvania j  22.  24 

Delaware 8.  70 

Maryland I  9.  90 

Virginia I  6.  84 

West  Virginia '  9.80 

North  Carolina '  5.  59 

South  Carolina j  441 

Georgia 5.  28 

Florida 4  40 

Ohio '  8.12 

Indiana I  0.  30 

Illinois o.  83 

3    a  1906 35 


1898. 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

$19.  20 

$18.00 

$19.  80 

$29.94 

$16.  06 

$19.  93 

$32. 16 

$23.  67 

18.86 

19.11 

20.72 

30.03 

17.01 

13.  23 

19.66 

25.53 

IS.  92 

10.92 

20.00 

29.20 

14  82 

14  51 

26.21 

23.60 

19.  00 

18.  30 

20.52 

30.78 

23.  16 

15.84 

25.92 

26.25 

21.70 

10.43 

21.44 

24.40 

22.  15 

24.  38 

28.  04 

23.08 

19.  24 

19.50 

20.90 

29.25 

23.  31 

15.  01 

28.40 

i:0.  32 

14  19 

13.  95 

15.04 

23.70 

16.75 

15.00 

17.47 

19.21 

14  80 

15.  00 

14.85 

24  35 

19.32 

13.  08 

22.04 

19.09 

14  80 

13.  12 

11.25 

21.70 

20.94 

17.78 

20.06 

21.01 

7.75 

7.48 

9.12 

17.10 

13.72 

13.48 

14.90 

1429 

10.  8.5 

11.52 

10.06 

19.84 

16.52 

14  04 

16.70 

17.71 

7.70 

7.60 

7.84 

13.  10 

11.44 

11.55 

13.75 

12.40 

10.73 

11.70 

13.50 

14  95 

14.31 

14  40 

10.  19 

15.79 

0.02 

0.  11 

6.84 

8.76 

8.34 

8.97 

9.42 

K.90 

4.60 

4  50 

4  48 

5.80 

7.18 

7.11 

8.68 

8.07 

4  32 

5.00 

5.70 

8.20 

6.57 

a  07 

8.45 

7.70 

4.50 

5.30 

4  80 

7.65 

6.02 

7.23 

8.02 

6.67 

9.99 

10.  80 

12.58 

14  88 

15.  90 

13.91 

14  95 

16.25 

9.00 

10.26 

12.16 

10.89 

13.04 

11.  95 

12.91 

15.  47 

7.50 

9.  30 

11.84 

12.20 

13.93 

11.59 

14  23 

15.12 

1906. 


$23.  68: 
24.00 

20.  95- 
23.  82- 

21.  18 
24  0O 
20.59 
19.24 
20.  90 
12.  60- 
15.75 
13.37 
16.  66. 
10.40 

8.91 
8.04 
6.82 
10.  61 
14  26 
13.00- 


- 


TEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMEXT    OF    AGBICT7LTTTEE. 


:Jue  per  acre  of  corn  in  th>:   "  -'   '       based  upon  farm   value  December  lt 

I     ned. 


I:  i.i:.    :    — .:    :t 
DM  b   ma 

A'iL. :  ;..  ; 

Itari  um 

^  ynming. 
Colom  lo 

Azfa  o  na 

I ;.  -.  * 

v.  . ■       i-  - 

C  tEA  i  nda 


:   : 

Z2it  Xote. — S-nbsiamiallj-  the  international  trade  of  the  -b-c  rid.    It  eioul . 
that  the  world's  export  and  import  totals  for  any  will 

are  t&ese:  (1 1  Different  periods  of  time  covered  in  the  "year"  of  the  ~ 
r  ---:'■  -•*  -  '-    -     ----"  "     " "•  i"  '  -  --i-    r.  -„:.-.     ;.-_:.-   ..:;-  .      ...  -•■_:.    .-.  :  ;■       .• 

count r  rent  practices  and  varying  degrees  of  failure  in'rec  siding  gin  and 

ultimate  destination:  (5t  different  practices  of  recording  reexported  goods:  .  -is  of 

::-•:.'':-        r  .   -     ..    r:    r-    '':..   r.    .:  :..  .7    -  _--  '.::-•  :    *.-•   ;.    :  -free  uei.1. 

The  exports  given  are  domestic  exports  and  the  imports  given  are  im  | 
as  it  is  feasible  and  consistent  so  to  express  the  facts:  no  statement  is  for  net 

While  there  are  some  inevitable  omissions  from  such  a  table  1    some 

duplications  became  of  ieshipments  that  do  not  appear  as  such  in  official  rej 

EX 


. .  "J   r.  ~  r. . 

A  U5t  ria-HnngB  ry 

'.  ■  .--  ::..  . 
1  ..-■  .-.  •. 
_'■"■  :;.-  -. 

r.      _"-   .      .  : 

Russia 

- 

U  .-..:-•-  :  Stan  - 


:  _'  :  :     : ._-    - 


•  l-UOi. 


STATISTICS    OF    CORN. 


547 


International  trade  in  com,  including  com  meal,  1901-1906 — Continued. 

IMPORTS. 


Country. 

Year  be- 
ginning- 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 
Bushels. 

1905. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Bvshels. 

Bushels. 

Austria-Hungary 

Jan.     1 

8, 647, 130 

5,874,971 

11,130,274 

14,090,377 

18,511,369 

Belgium 

Jan.      1 

14,954,812 

14,5S3,O0S 

3),  323, 863 

19,4'4,330 

24, 169, 780 

Cape  of  Good  Hope 

Jan.     1 

2, 833, 220 

1,943,886 

3.471,281 

1,236,927 

2,171,601 

Cuba 

Jan.      1 

1,486,138 

1,150,176 

619, 326 

696, 517 

0988,03-9 

Denmark 

Jan.      1 

11,988,644 

12,365,050 

8,772,022 

9,284,777 

10,859,257 

Egypt 

Jan.      1 

426,  907 

55. 266 

142,537 

53,017 

1,279,749 

Jan.      1 

11.611,509 

8,674.931 

11,347,114 

10,124.353 

11.121.S06 

Germany  & 

Jan.     1 

46,978,877 

35,454,243 

37,527,343 

30,450,853 

36, 538, 366 

Italy 

Jan.     1 

9,985.324 

8,216,902 

15,092,527 

8, 365, 123 

5,904,844 

Jan.     1 

963,047 

142,102 

496.028 

c 476, 182 

c 1,454, 327 

Netherlands 

Jan.     1 

IS. 635, 890 

15.817,237 

20,160,078 

16,547,198 

16,234,785 

Norway 

Jan.      1 

743,642 

637,387 

765,  246 

555, 991 

541,949 

Portugal 

Jan.      1 

434,416 

759,967 

366,605 

531,889 

2, 607, 130 

Jan.      1 

351, 7S6 

135, 822 

457,715 

025,526 

161,218 

Jan.      1 

2,637,703 

99:;,  272 

1,484,490 

2,761,426 

1,904,186 

Jan.      1 

5S5, 747 

191,958 

189,357 

234, 9S6 

491,035 

Switzerland 

Jan.      1 

2,130,011 

2,404,644 

2,611,202 

2.704.457 

2,498,380 

Jan.      1 

■<  1,042,166 

1,306,038 

2,197.476 

1,422,985 

d  1,642, 166 

United  Kingdom 

Jan.      1 

105,S19,438 

89,371.445 

101,284,919 

86,076,697 

84,156,490 

6, 939, 000 

10.415,000 

18,652,000 

15,313,000 

17,852,000 

Total 

249. 7S5, 407 

210.483,315 

257,091,403 

221,026,611 

241,088,477 

a  Average,  1901-1901.      *  Not  including  free  ports.      <•  Preliminary  figures,      d  Ayerage,  1902-1904. 
Average  farm  price  of  corn  per  bushel  in  the  United  States,  December  1, 1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 

1S97. 

1898. 

1S99. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

Cents. 
47 
4.") 
43 
47 
54 
49 
40 
3S 
34 
30 
30 
38 
40 
43 
49 
48 
55 
25 
21 
21 
27 
25 
24 
17 
24 
32 
21 
17 
22 
35 
36 
46 
45 
45 
41 

Cents. 
48 
46 
44 
49 
64 
52 
43 
40 
40 
31 
35 
35 
37 
43 
46 
48 
50 
27 
25 
25 
34 
28 
24 
23 
27 
36 
23 
22 

26 
27 
29 
41 
39 
41 
34 

Cents. 
50 
49 
47 
51 
53 
50 
45 
40 
41 
34 
36 
38 
45 
47 
50 
50 
53 
30 
27 
26 
36 
30 
24 
23 
30 
33 
26 
23 
25 
37 
39 
47 
46 
44 
36 

Cents. 
55 
56 
50 
54 
67 
55 
47 
45 
45 
38 
41 
49 
50 
57 
64 
57 
60 
34 
32 
32 
37 
33 
29 
27 
32 
42 
29 
31 
32 
40 
49 
58 
58 
50 
47 

Cents. 
76 
78 
73 
76 
76 
75 
72 
66 
62 
57 
58 
59 
65 
73 
84 
82 
85 
57 
55 
57 
52 
52 
45 
52 
67 
46 
45 
54 
63 
61 
65 
77 
74 
75 
SO 
76 
76 
81 
90 
72 
74 
77 
90 
90 
60 
58 
57 
68 

Cents. 
74 
73 
68 
74 
78 
74 
67 
56 
58 
49 
51 
52 
54 
60 
69 
73 
77 
42 
36 
36 
52 
50 
40 
33 
33 
45 
41 
30 
34 
42 
47 
67 
61 
66 
66 
43 
39 
49 
72 
59 
59 
78 
101 
67 
62 
65 
lie, 

77 

Cents. 
66 
63 
62 
66 
81 
67 
60 
57 
57 
49 
51 
53 
64 
61 
69 
69 
73 
47 
36 
36 
46 
43 
38 
38 
34 
42 
35 
28 
36 
56 
49 
57 
54 
58 
48 
39 
"38 
51 
62 
58 
54 
75 
90 
70 
57 
55 
67 
74 

Cents. 
81 
72 
73 
72 
84 
73 
64 
58 
59 
49 
50 
59 
64 
62 
70 
71 
75 
46 
41 
39 
52 
46 
36 
33 
44 
40 
36 
33 
41 
49 
50 
60 
56 
57 
52 
40 
39 
53 
68 
57 
54 
78 
91 
72 
70 
66 
61 
78 

Cents. 
69 
69 
68 
70 
71 
71 
61 
55 
54 
47 
48 
53 
53 
64 
74 
70 
66 
43 
38 
38 
46 
42 
33 
34 
37 
36 
31 
32 
33 
43 
50 
64 
65 
61 
49 
37 
32 
55 
68 
75 
47 
69 
97 
70 
66 
60 
59 
70 

Cents. 
64 

64 

59 

60 

64 

60 

59 

53 

52 

42 

45 

55 

55 

68 

73 

67 

62 

Ohio                      

39 

36 

36 

44 

41 

34 

32 

38 

39 

29 

29 

32 

42 

47 

64 

61 

60 

50 

32 

20 
38 
52 
43 
43 
58 

26 
43 
59 

60 
48 

64 

30 

40 
65 
50 

38 

58 

29 
66 
55 
40 
56 

47 

65 

59 

50 

72 

85 

Utah 

55 

60 

59 

63 

74 

56 

55 

53 
56 

42 
60 
62 

5r> 
64 
60 

59 
57 
61 

55 

65 

67 

General  ayerage 

26.3 

28.7 

30.3 

35.7 

60.5 

40.3 

42.5 

44.1 

41.2 

39.9 

548 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Wholesale  prices  of  corn  per  bushel  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


New  York. 


Date. 


No.  2. 


I  Low.  High 


1902. 

January 

February 

March. ." 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. . . 

October 

November. . . 
December 

1903. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. .. 

October 

November. .. 
December 

1904. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. . . 

October 

November . . . 
December 

1905. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September... 

October 

November. .. 
December 

1906. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. . . 

October 

November. .. 
December . . . 


as. 

66 
66! 
65 
654 

eel 

68| 
65| 

634 
67* 
*  671 
61! 
57 


55 

.->.->} 

50; 

51 

52! 

56 

561. 

58J 

531 

51} 

•J'.", 

m 


511 
53 
543 

52i 
55' 

47; 

53! 
55| 
56J 

.v>; 
■>4; 
53 


51J 

51 
52 
51 

52 
57f 

59! 
60 
59 
58* 
52 
50| 


47 

47* 

52 

.-,.-,■' 

58 

563 

55 

563 

54} 

52f 

50 


Baltimore. 


Mixed. 


Low.  High 


as. 

72} 

71} 

71i 

73 

73 

71J 

73 

69! 

72* 

70} 

67 

64 


US! 

59 

56* 

53i 

55 

60| 

60 

60} 

59f 

54 

52f 

53J 


56 

63 

57 

56 

60 

50! 

55| 

62J 

603 

623 

69 

54! 


524 
54J 
543 
52! 
58} 
024 

054 

023 

61 

62?, 

024 

533. 


51J 
493 

52 
56J 

58 

(ill 

60 

58 

581 

504 

56 

53 


as. 

58! 

60} 

63 

63* 

66| 

67J 

67 

59 

64 

65 

47 

434 


51! 

52! 

4~1 
481 
51 

544 

5X> 

58" 
56 
53 
40  4 
461 


4!'! 
40; 
50} 
:,oi 
511 
50J 
50J 
534 
504 


44i 
■14 
45  4 
48 
483 
50  J 
58 
56 
56 
51 
42 
42 


47:; 

45i 

40 
40 

:,:, 

55 

553 

54} 

53* 

511 

40 
50 


as. 

69J 

684 

68 

69 

70 

72 

77 

67 

69 

69 

68 

55} 


60 

55 

52f 

52! 

55* 

59 

61 

60 

60 

55 

544 

40  i 


50 

54.1 

52| 

52^ 

54 

53f 

53J 

5X4 

58f 


Cincinnati. 


No.  2. 


Low.  High 


.50.4 

50! 

54 

524 

56J 

04" 

65 

03'. 

63 

63 

01 

51'. 


49f 
54} 
573 

58 

57! 

55! 

54 :: 

54' 
52 
51  J 


as. 

62 

61 

62 

604 

64 

634. 

634 

58 

60 

60 

45 

44 


45'. 
40 

40 
45' 
48J 

50 

524 
48 
45', 
45! 
444 


45', 
454 
46 
50i 

514 


524. 
55 

554 
56£ 
4.5  4 


454. 
46 
48 

474 

40 

54 

57 

54 

544 

554 

454 


44 

42 

43 

47 

514 

514 

534 

50*. 

48 

48 

47', 

43" 


Chicago. 


No.  2. 


Detroit.  1  St.  Louis. 


No.  2. 


Low.  High.  Low.  High 


as. 

684. 

644 

64 

67*. 

67} 

664 

69 

64 

634 

62j 

60 

50 


48| 
48 

47 

40 

47 1 

54 

53 

544 

53 

40 

46 

46 


404 

474 

51 

54 

564. 

51 

554 

574. 

57" 

59 

58J 

52 


40 

48*. 
52 

504 

544 

57 

594 

574 

504 

56J 

53" 

47 


40, 
444 
48 
524 

554 

54 

554. 
54J 

504 
50 

4X4 

48 


as. 

564 
56f 

56 

56| 

594, 

61 

56 

54 

57 

55 

52| 

43! 


45; 

424 
41| 
41| 

44 

47} 

40 

504 

4.51 

43* 

41| 

41 


42J 

40 

40 

40,4 

471 

53} 

47} 

51} 

51 

50 

50 

434 


42 

42! 

454 

46 

48 

51f 

53| 

53 

513 

50 

454 

42 


41 
413 

50 
434 
47'. 
50^ 
404 
48| 
47" 
44J 
44 
40 


as. 

044 

61} 

61Ji 

644 

64| : 

71* 

88 

60 

621 ' 

014 

58  | 

57} 


481 
45 
45i 
453 

40 

52 

53 

53 

52! 

40 

44! 

43 :; 


47J 
544 
504 
50; 
50 
594 
50 
:,^< 
54| 


43J 

45J 

4x4 
40  4 
044 
56j 

59 

57 
54  4 
54! 
51 
50} 


45 

454 

44" 

4X 

50 

54! 

53 

51 

50 

47} 

47} 

40 


Cts. 

57 

59 

59 

594. 

634. 

63} 

66 

66 

55! 

574 

60 


47 

47 

404 

414 

404 

404 

51 

544 

51" 

474 

404 

44" 


No.  2. 


Low.  High 


as. 

67! 

62 

614 

644 

654 

664 

67 

67 

594 

60" 

664 

704 


474 

454 

48 

55 

55J 

554 

56! 

514 

4s\ 

484 


No.  3. 
42 

454 

444 

4X4 

51 

4.X.4 

49 

514 

53-1 

52 

474 

444 


45 
4.5.4 
48! 

404 
494 
54" 
57} 
5.5.4 
544 
55! 
44J 

44; 


44! 

45" 
43} 

4X4 

50! 
52 

53 

•"'-'1 
49 
48} 


40! 

4X4 

51! 

50  | 

54  I 

57} 

58 

57 

55* 

59  | 

55* 

454} 


45! 

46! 

47 
52 
53  4 
55 
55 
54 
52 
49! 

4o-; 

404 


as. 

59 

58! 

59 

59! 

62* 

62 

61 

54 

56! 

56 

44! 

40! 


4U 
41 
39 
39j 

41' 
48 
48 

48 

45 
414 
414 
414 


43! 

44J 

44  i 

48 

48 

47  I 

48! 

51J 

51  ! 

514 

484 

42J 


43! 

44 

46 

46} 

48 

50! 

51  ! 

511 

514 

50" 

414 

41* 


as. 

69} 
63 
63 

67 

66 

67 

66 

61! 

60! 

58* 

49" 

494 


444 
44! 
45 
42  4 
47 1 
55 
51! 
514 
50 
45 
433 
45 


40 1 

514 

54" 

50. 

52! 

r,r, 

54 

54* 

57 

4" 


45 

47 

49 

40  4 

53 

56 

58. 

54! 

544 

534 

5l| 

40  4 


41! 
39! 

40} 

4.34 

40 

48 

50* 

46! 

46" 

44 

41 

39! 


SI.  30  SI.  45 
1. 
1. 
1.' 


San  Fran- 
cisco. 


No.  1,  white 
(per  cwt.) . 


Low.  High. 


43! 

424 
444 
511 
51 

554 

544 

51 

47- 

40 

454 

45" 


1.30 

1.30 

1.174 

1.17! 

1.17! 

1.20 

1.25 

1.55 

1.474 

1.30" 

1.25 

1.25 


1.274 

1.25" 

1.30 

1.37! 

1.424 

1.  40" 

1.40 

1.40 

1.50 

1.40 

1.  374 

1.25" 


1.25 
1.321 
1.  324 

1.  324 
1.324 
1.40" 
1.40 
1.40 
1.  324 
1.30 
1.30 
1.  324 


STATISTICS    OF  _,  WHEAT.  549 

Condition  of  the  corn  crop  of  the  United  States,  monthly,  1892-1906. 


Year. 

July. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

Oct. 

Year. 

July. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

Oct. 

Year. 

July. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

Oct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

1392 

81.1 

82.5 

79.6 

79.8 

1897.... 

82.9 

84.2 

79.3 

77.1 

1902. . . 

87.5 

86.5 

84.3 

79.6 

1S93 

93.2 

87.0 

76.7 

75.1 

;  1898.... 

90.5 

87.0 

84.1 

82.0 

1903... 

79.4 

78.7 

80.1 

80.8 

1894 

95.0 

69.1 

63.4 

64.2 

1899.... 

86.5 

89.9 

85.2 

82.7 

1904... 

86.4 

87.3 

84.6 

83.9 

1895 

99.3 

102.5 

96.4 

95.5 

■  1900.... 

89.5 

87.5 

80.6 

78.2 

1905... 

87.3 

89.0 

89.5 

89.2 

1896 

92.4 

96.0 

91.0 

90.5 

1901.... 

81.3 

54.0 

51.7 

52.1 

1906... 

87.5 

8S.1 

90.2 

90.1 

WHEAT. 

Wheat  crop  of  countries  named,  1902-1906. 

[Substantially  th3  crop  of  the  world.] 


Country. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

NORTH  AMERICA. 

Bushels. 
670.063,000 

Bushels. 
637,822,000 

Bushels. 
552,400,000 

Bushels. 
692,979,000 

Bushels. 
735,261,000 

Canada: 

468.000 
26, 904, 000 
54,7.50,000 
13, 524, 000 

877,000 
4.000,000 

471,000 

22.583,000 

41,381.000 

15,598.000 

1,238,000 

4,000,000 

371,000 
13, 030, 000 
40,397,000 
16,447,000 

968,000 
4.000,000 

418,000 
22,195,000 
57,519,000 
26,930,000 
2.379,000 
4,000,000 

420,000 

Ontario 

22,806,000 
63.181,000 

Saskatchewan 

38,207.000 
3,896.000 

Other 

4,000,000 

100, 523, 000 

85,271,000 

75,213,000 

113.441,000 

132.510,000 

Mexico 

8,477,000 

10,  493, 000 

9.393,000 

5,000,000 

5,000,000 

Total  North  America 

779. 063. 000 

733,586,000 

637.006,000 

811,420,000 

872,771,000 

SOUTH   AMERICA. 

56,380,000 

10,641,000 
7. 1*4,000 

103,759,000 
10,114,000 
5, 240, 000 

129,672.000 
17,948.000 
7,565.000 

150,745,000 

20,000.000 

6,000,000 

134,931,000 

Chile 

15, 800, 000 

4,606,000 

Total  South  America 

74.625,000 

119,113,000 

155,185,000 

176,745,000 

155,337,000 

EUROPE. 

Austria-Hungary: 

Austria 

Hungary  proper 

49,655,000 

170,884,000 

12,017,000 

2,384,000 

46, 19S, 000 

161,958,000 

14, 664. 000 

3,901,000 

53, 734, 000 

137,078.000 

9,841.000 

3,753.000 

54,531,000 

157,512,000 

13,077.000 

3, 016, 000 

58,255,000 
197,408,000 
10,343,000 

Bosnia-Herzegovina 

2,693,000 

Total  Austria-Hungary... 

234, 940, 000 

226,721,000 

204,406.000 

228,136,000 

268,699,000 

14,521,000 

35,000,000 

4.528,000 

79.000 

327.841,000 

143,315,000 

8,000.000 

136.210.000 

200.000 

5. 105. 000 

265.000 

10,400.000 

7(1.220. 000 

12,350.000 

35,551.000 

4.461,000 

130. 000 

364,320,000 

130, 626, 000 

8,000,000 

184,451,000 

200,000 

4,258,000 

307.000 

8, 000. 000 

73.700,000 

13,817,000 

42,242.000 

4,302,000 

133,000 

298. 826, 000 

139. 803. 000 

8.000,000 

167,635.000 

200.000 

4, 423, 000 

212,000 

6, 500. 000 

53. 738, 000 

12,401,000 

40,736,000 

4,083,000 

130,000 

335,453.000 

135,947.000 

8,000,000 

160,504,000 

200.000 

5.109.000 

329,  000 

5,000.000 

103,328,000 

13,000,000 

55, 076, 000 

4, 400, 000 

130,000 

France 

324. 725, 000 
144, 754, 000 

8,000.000 

Italy 

168, 000, 000 

200,000 

4, 700, 000 

300. 000 

8,000.000 

113,867,000 

550  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Wheal  crop  of  countries  named,  1902-1906 — Continued. 


Count  ry. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

EUEOPE — continued 

Russia: 

Russia  proper 

Bushels. 
463,  2-58.000 
20.349.000 
77.069.000 

Bushels. 
'  4.54. 

19.255.000 
77,941,000 

Bushels. 
519.964,000 

21.241.000 
81,132.000 

Bushels. 
451,327,000 

20.239.000 
96.S17.000 

Bushels. 
35S.000.000 
19  000  000 

73  000  000 

Total  Russia  ( European i. 

560. 676. 000 

i     551.792.000 

622,337,000 

5tiS.3S3.000 

450.000.000 

11.409.000 

133.523.000 

4.  757.000 

4.200.000 

25.000,000 

10.SS5.000 

5.538.000 

4.000.000 
26.000.000 

11,676.000 
95,377,000 

5.135.000 

4,000.000 

23.000.000 

11.262.000 

92.0.54.(100 

5,529,000 

4,000.000 

20.000.000 

13.211.000 

154.090.000 

6.227.000 

4.000.000 

22.000.000 

Sweden 

S  wit  zerla  ad 

Turkey  '..European  | 

Kingdom: 
■  Britain — 

England 



Wales 

Ireland 

55.216,000 
1,856,000 

1.391.000 
1,602.000 

46.524.000 
1,528, 

1.093.000 
1.176.000 

35. 624. 000 

1.499.000 

919.000 

1.040.000 

57.424.000 
2,130,000 

1.204.000 
1.430.000 

57.5S3.000 
2.  0 
1,308,000 

1.400.000 

Total  United  Kingdom. . . 

60. 065, 000 

50.321.000 

39.OS2.000 

62,188.000 

62,354,000 

Total  Europe 

1.796.254.000 

1.830.590.000 

1,744,844,000 

1.802.772.000 

1.S25. 733.000 

ASIA.. 

British  India,  including  native 

9  where  reporting 

Cvprus 

227,  380,  000 

297.601.000 
2.477.000 

359.936.000 
2.176.000 

2S3.063.000 
2.000.000 

319, 586. 000 
2.000.000 

Japanese  Empire: 

Japan 

Formosa 

20.  243. 000 
107. 000 

9. 600. 000 
179.000 

19.7.54.000 
190.000 

IS.  437.000 
200  000 

IS. 000.000 
200.000 

Total  Japanese  Empire. . . 

20.  £50. 000 

9.779.000 

19.944.000 

18.637.000 

is. 200. 000 

Persia 

13.600.000 

16.000.000 

16.000.000 

16.000.000 

16.000.000 

Russia: 

15.S97.000 
30. 796, 000 

20.995.000 
48, 670. 000 

12.S22.000 
31,590,000 

25.491.000 
42.411.000 

21  000  000 

Sil^eria 

35.000.000 

Total  Russia  1  Asiatic 

4-1.693. 000 

69,665,000 

44. 412. 000 

67.902.000 

56. 000. 000 

35.000.000 

33,000,000 

33.000.000 

33.000.000 

33  000  000 

Total  Asia 

343.920.000 

428.522,000 

47.5. 468, 000 

420.ro2.000 

444.7 

AFRICA. 

Algeria 

Egypt 



Sudan  (Anglo-Egyptian   

Tunis 

33,896,000 

2.0110.000 

12.000.000 

4.000 

300.000 

4.127.000 

34.03.5.000 

1.7.5.5.000 

11.000.000 

4.000 

294.000 

7. -523. 000 

25.4S4.000 
2.000.000 
12.000.000 
7,000 
486,000 
10.519.000 

20.000.000 

2.000.000 

12.000.000 

4.000 

5.729.000 

28.000.000 
2.000.000 

12.000.000 

400.000 
4.409.0CO 

Total  Africa 

52.327.000 

54.611.000 

50.496.000 

40.216,000 

46.813.0CO 

TRAXASIA. 

Australia: 

Queensland 

1.746.000 

15.275.000 

12.  .510. 000 

-   5. 000 

963.000 

994.000 

6.000 

1.63.5.000 

50.000 

6.  5.5,5. 000 

1.017.000 

905.000 

.    "14.000 
28.196.000 
29.  425. 000 
13.626.000 

1.935.000 
792,000 

2.217.000 
16. 983. 000 
21.606.000 
12.454.000 

2.077.000 
■   1 

1  173  oro 

-  rath  Wales 

21  3"il  000 

24.  1  ■ 

20  77°  GOO 

South  Australia 

Western  Australia 

Tasmania 

2,381,000 

S01. 000 

ToMl    Australian    Com-  l 
monwealtb 

753, 000 

12.768.000 

76.4SS.000 

56.215.000 

70  6S1  000 

Xew  Zealand. 

4.174.000 

7. 6Q3. 000 

8,140.000 

9,411,000 

7  013  000 

1 

43.927.000 

20.461.000 

84.C2S.000 

6.5.  626.  000 

77. 694. 000 

Grand  total 

5.090.116.000 

383,000 

3.147.627.000 

3,317,381,000 

3. 423, 134. 000 

a  Includes  government  of  Chernomorsk. 


STATISTICS    OF    WHEAT. 


551 


International  trade  in  wheat,  1901—1906.* 

EXPORTS. 


Count  rv. 


Yea  r  be- 
ginning— 


1901. 


1902. 


1903. 


Argentina tan.  1 

Australia Jan.  1 

Austria-Hungary Jan.  1 

ium.. ....... Jan.  1 

British  India Apr.  1 

Bulgaria Jan.  1 

Canada Jan.  1 

Chile Jan.  1 

Germany  6 Jan.  1 

rlaiius Tan.  1 

Roumania Jan.  1 

Russia 'an.  1 

Servia Jan.  1 

United  States July  1 

Other  countries 


Bushels. 

"3.22.1.924 
20.2lO.O5S 

13,773,674 

4.901.652 

26.  117. 530 

57.350 

3.  410. 976 
37.427.119 

83,  408,  574 

2. 186,  913 

154.  856, 102 

; 


Bushels. 

23. 696. 306 

8,  9ft'.  282 

518,  S  8 

12.4'  7,375 

19,  542.  525 

8,624,  508 

32. 9S5.  745 

918,661 

3. 019.  553 

36,979,823 

33,750,616 

111,977,478 

114,181,420 

9.054.9S9 


'    Bushels. 

61,778,175 

1,172,838 

603. 379 

11,751,205 

■ 

L,  979, 146 

39,740,530 
30,611,933 

1,841,636 

44. 230, 169 

4,547,909 


1904. 


Bushels. 

33,071,653 
117,282 

80,  475. 855 

- 
14.700.315 
2,718,470 

_ 
40,681,553 
26,107,148 

"     i 
i 
5,294,121 


Bushels. 
105. 391. 256 
24,648,182 

'.453 
35,171,216 

"   J.  1.17 

6.050.111 
53,052,451 
63.066.299 
176,789,611 

3,  422.  554 
34,  973, 291 

3.1<  - 


Total 424. 059,656   418,572,590    435,946,057    504,268,487 


Belgium Jan.  1 

Brazil Jan.  1 

Denmark Jan.  1 

Finland Jan.  1 

France Jan.  1 

Germany  b Jan.  1 

Greece..' Jan.  1 

Italy Jan.  1 

Japan Tan.  1 

Netherlands Jan.  1 

Portugal Jan.  1 

Spain Jan.  1 

Sweden Jan.  1 

Switzerland Jan.  1 

United  Kingdom Jan.  1 

Other  countries 


i 

4.  209,  246 

5.070.715 

1.504 

■    •       •' 

78,418,416 

- 

38,444,603 

190. 833 

48,  145.  253 

3. 392, 04S 

5. 273. 16S 

6,321,228 

14,253,502 

129.557.0V2 

13. -•93.372 


57.002. 144 

5.501.214 

4.329.013 

11. US 

9.029.614 

76,225,923 

27J 

4 •■:.  274.  04S 

192.  298 

47,293,883 

336,  955 

2. 556.  594 

7.510.655 

S    --      ' 

150.  S93. 534 

15,741,532 


- 
I 
17,365,172 

i     ■-- 
6. 109,  739 
43,115,829 

2,748,269 

22 

-  _   -  _ 

i 
23,58 


i 
7.112.130 
■ 
.    878 

• 
74,2 

5.  132.  775 

"    -■  i 

-    -    '■■ 

50. 510. 097 

282,29* 

S.  192. 527 

8,082,561 

17.220.343 

• 
21,296,518 


-J.991 
7,873,514 
3,447 

4.215 
6,  7 1 

; 

5.  753. 503 
•     ■ 

2  281,022 
61,992,589 

4.  '.72. 573 
32.517.7S5 

7.255.222 
16,158,553 

1S1.579.S27 
9.  409. 308 


Total 414.111.705    441. 410.347    477.7-     292  11,732      527.170.S14 


a  See  "General  note"  p.  546. 


b  Xot  including  free  ports. 


International  trade  in  icheat  flour,  1901-1906.a 
EXPORTS. 


Country. 


Year  be- 
ginning—I 


1901. 


Argentina Jan. 

Australia 

Austria-Hungary Jan. 

Belgium Jan. 

British  India Vpr. 

Bulgaria Jan. 

Canada Jan. 

Chile Jan. 

Germany  *> Jan. 

Netherlands Jan. 

Roumania Jan. 

Russia Jan. 

Seryia Jan. 

United  States July 

Other  countries 


Total. 


Barrels. 
806.959 
987. 89S 

208.906 

302. 473 

146.246 

1,086.648 

3.959 

325. 498 

Si  J.  566 

269.970 

728.631 

8.849 

17,759,203 

1,105,783 


24,800.132 


Barrels. 

439.  125 

336.  949 

1,114,607 

316.  272 

410.330 

154.  697 

1,287,766 

27     -" 

_      - 

82.21S 

214,505 

4.  402 
9,716,484 
1.209.7S6 


Barrels. 

809.636 

62,214 

1,095,357 
358.132 
463,098 
211.311 

-   S87  ■ 

295.698 

106.207 

277   557 

1.025.773 

38.827 

16,999,432 

• 


Barrels. 

1.052.  .500 

589.426  ! 
2:32.  315 

1.321.469 
95,099 
616. 939 
1*1.372 
135.900 

1.172.442 
28 

S.  S26. 335 

.   258     28 


Barrels. 
1.628.271 
1,573,663 

1 

512.  329 
214. 5S7 

991,701 

199. 777 

484.511 

970. SOS 

21.79S 

13.919.048 

5.169,334 


26,186.055     24.454.171      18,265,101       2S.  9.54. 384 


a  See  ''General  note  "  p.  546. 


b  Xot  including  free  ports. 


552 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


International  tra<l>  in  vital  flour.  1901—1906 — <"<nunued. 

IMPORTS. 


Country. 


Year  lie- 
ginning— 


1901. 


Belgium Jan. 

Brazil Jan. 

Denmark Jan. 

Finland Jan. 

France Jan. 

Germany  a Jan. 

Greece . ." Jan. 

Italv Jar. 


Japan 

Netherlands 

Spain 

Sweden 

Switzerland 

United  Kingdom. 
Other  countries. . 


Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 


Total. 


Barrels. 

232.9(19 

1,502,173 

350.992 

574. 505 

282     25 

432. 713 

23.  OSS 

14. 037 

425.002 

2.030.724 

33.930 

■      ".- 

4S1.500 

12,714,516 


1902. 


Barrels 

99.022 
1,187,695 

379.  Sot; 

670, 193 

32S.  927 

354. S18 

.      • 

12.470 

496.633 

1.S79.773 

14. 17S 

98. 375 

406.907 

11.040.771 

6.170.616 


1903. 


Barrels. 

1,317.531 
467,774 

764. 152 

255.777 

359.704 

21.762 

13.085 

1.411.611 

1.974,151 

6.002 

93.494 

379.004 

11.754.350 
.  2 


24,960,460     23,167,086     26.660,406 


1904. 


Barrels. 
40.255 

1.474.049 
416.  460 
757.085 
232. 150 

S4 

11.700 
1.291.886 

■    ■ 
13.  094 

a   ■■•_ 

411.596 
8, 384. 319 
5.906.077 


41.516 

I    '"       14 

653,978 

!   -   74S 

140.854 

240. -W0 

_-      B 

12. 513 

I   242   981 

■  28 

■  "  " 
73  U 
a 


21.165.347 


o  Not  including  free  ports. 

International  trade  in  wheat,  including  flour,  1901- 1906.* 
EXPORTS. 


Country. 


Year  be- 
ginning— 


1901. 


1902. 


1903. 


1904. 


1905. 


Argentina Jan.  1 

Australia Jan.  1 

Austria-Hungary Jan.  1 

Belgium Jan.  1 

British  India Apr.  1 

Bulgaria Jan.  1 

Canada Jan.  1 

Chile Jan.  1 

Germany  * Jan.  1 

Netherlands Jan.  1 

Roumania Jan.  1 

Russia Jan.  1 

Jan.  1 

July  1 


Seryia. 

United  States. . 
Other  countries. 

Total 


Bushels. 
S58.24 

24. 705. 599 
5.1S5.254 

14.107.813 

15.134.802 

5.  559.  759 

31.007.446 

75.166 

-  .-- 

-  n 

22. 104.  492 

S6.6S7.414 

.    ..      ? 

234,772,! 

14,569,635 


Bushels. 
25,672 
10.515.552 

5. 534. 270 
13,890,599 
21.3S9.010 

9,320,644 

•   "- 

1.043.8S3 

4,044,662 
37.349.S04 
34.715.SSS 
114  872  26 
S75  v. 
202.905.598 
14.499.026 


Bushels. 
65.421.537 

1.452.  S01 

5. 532. 4S5 
13.362.799 
50.6S4.27o 
13.1S5.710 
23. 923. 22S 

2.270.72S 

7.956.750 
40. 21 S.  462 

■ 
158,064,833 

2.016.35S 
120.727.613 

9.311.307 


90.115.119 
7,807,9 

3, 9S4. 7*9 

IS. 217. 597 

28   272 

i     - 

-       ." 
3.146.416 
• 
-     268,223 
26.7U 
174.334.1S2 
■      . 
44.112.910 
10.  955. 247 


But  I 
112.7:-    " 
72 

"     08,25 

47.2 

10,512  "   " 

53.951.447 

"■  .-: 

97.009.007 
.     370,401 


535,660.252    "  "-"•-.      "•     461,444      "   ■     93.090 


IMPORTS. 


Belgium 

Brazil 

Denmark 

Finland 

France 

Germany  » 

Greece..' 

Italy 

Japan 

Netherlands 

Portugal 

Spam 

Sweden 

Switzerland 

United  Kingdom. 
Other  countries. . 


Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 


55.982 
11.374.024 
6,650,179 

-  a    73 

"    -  ■ 

6.492.956 

38.510.469 

2.103.342 

57.283.511 

3.393.200 

5. 425.  853 

6.710,600 

.     23 

ISO. 772.  404 

39,272,978 


..   .   .   u 

10.  845.  !*42 
■    27! 

. 
10. 509. 7S6 
73   --.   G  - 
6,396,218 

43.330.190 

2.427.146 

55.  752.  Sol 

336. 955 

2.620.395 

7.953,343 

17.057.583 

200.577.004 

43. 509. 304 


.     .  . 

12.129.189 
5. 791 .  296 
3.442.444 

72. 501 . 263 

6,207,666 
43.174.711 

9,164,759 
58,552,554 

2,748.5 
-   • 

•     S     . 

18.030.145 

217.100.937 

58.579.453 


64.160.4.55 
13.745.350 

•  -    •   -. 

3.413.760 

•  ."   . 
75.430.443 

5.207.403 

29.  670. 497 

6.702.045 

a 

282   -    • 
S.  253. 950 

19.072.525 
219.713.498 


-    ;    ■ 

14,983.262 

5.9  ' 
3. 98 

7,343     Si 
85,136,923 

'   -  ..742 
38.7- 
!   S3 

243 

"-.573 

35. 902, 559 

7,51! 

7,898,  *. 

212. 0S9. 144 

■"  283 


Total 526.433*772   545,712.235   597.758.121    578.255,793      608,783 


M-neral  note,"  p.  546. 


l>  Not  including  free  ports. 


STATISTICS    OF    WHEAT. 
World'' s  visible  supply  of  wheat,  first  of  each  month,  for  ten  years.  a 


553 


Month. 


Bushels. 
88,378,000 
77,390,000 
87,075,000 
119,162,000 
139,321.000 
156,010,000 
157,008,000 
151,717,000 
140,571.000 
132.037.000 
111,233.000 
June 103, 845, 000 


July 

August 

September. 

October 

November. 
December.. 

January 

February. . 

March 

April 

May. 


1897-98. 


1898-99.       I     1899-1900.     I     1900-1901. 


Bushels. 
86,773,000 
70,101,000 
66,511,000 
83.090,000 
106. 886, 000 
135,846,000 
147,197,000 
146,458,000 
151,124,000 
144,950,000 
139,521,000 
136.952,000 


Bushels. 
140.299.000 
134, 525, 000 
142,595.000 
162.877,000 
191,189,000 
203.477,000 
200,388,000 
190,535,000 
181,527,000 
184.141,000 
175.776,000 
159,405,000 


Bushels. 
149.839,000 
150,193,000 
164,629,000 
188,200,000 
200.892.000 
203.237,000 
200,534.000 
197.851,000 
192,749,000 
187,817,000 
171,753,000 
152.51S.000 


Bushels. 

135.092.000 

132,379.000 

141,071,000 

159.465.000 

169, 854, 000 

202.108,000 

200.990.000 

202.278,000 

191,877.000 

179,789.000 

155.480,000 

131.255,000 


Month. 


July 

August 

September 
October... 
November 
December. 
January. . 
February. 
March. . . . 

April 

May 

June 


1902-3. 


Bushels. 
103.671,000 

93.944,000 
102,364,000 
133.370.000 
163,491,000 
179,483,000 
174, 640. 000 
168.170.000 
163.658,000 
149.748.000 
127,088.000 
112.963,000 


1903-4. 


Bushels. 
95, 820. 000 
87.566.000 
96.907,000 
132. 972. 000 
145.018,000 
101.S91.000 
107.712.000 
159,464,000 
152.035.000 
147.859.000 
145.840,000 
133,190,000 


1904-5. 


1905-6. 


1906-7. 


Bushels. 
IIS.  073. 000 
103,740,000 
115.183,000 
144,400,000 
170,240.000 
186,891,000 
178.710.000 
171.124.000 
165,370.000 
155.744,000 
141,734.000 
123,770,000 


Bushels. 


114, 
106, 
113. 
138. 
157. 
189, 
192, 
188, 
193. 
183. 
159. 
139, 


302.000 
838,000 
511.000 
759.000 
735.000 
323.000 
690.000 
030. 000 
520.000 
687.000 
406,000 
154.000 


Bushels. 
124,081,000 

'i  41  ,"459  .'666 
170.474,000 
195.739,000 
215.930,000 
208,351,000 
193.548.000 
198, 020, 000 


a  From  Broomhall's  Corn  Trade  News. 

Visible  supply  of  wheat  in  the  United  States  and  Canada,  first  of  each  month,  for  ten  years. 
EAST  OF  ROCKY  MOUNTAINS.* 


Month. 


July 

August . . . 
September 
October... 
November 
December. 
January. . 
February. 
March. . . . 

April 

May 

June 


1897-9S. 


1S9S-99. 


Bushels. 

27,090,000 

23,793,000 

20.302,000 

31.508.000 

42.609,000 

49. 859. 000 

54,173,000 

51,105,000 

45,021.000 

40.577,000 

31.039.000 

27.479,000 


Bushels. 


009,000 
430,000 
499.000 
857.000 
930,000 
914,000 
057,000 
648.000 
0S5.000 
747.000 
258.000 
092,000 


1899-1900. 


1900-1901. 


1901- 


Bushels. 

46,544,000 

49,155.000 

48.087,000 

60,040,000 

77,195.000 

84.687,000 

89.252,000 

87.473.000 

83,935.000 

77.113.000 

70,764.000 

57,617,000 


Bushels. 

59.063.000 

60, 398. 000 

69.003,000 

76.071.000 

82.238.000 

89.591,000 

88.  456, 090 

80.324,000 

79.300.000 

73.879.000 

60. 298. 000 

47, 109, 000 


Bushels. 
37,819.000 
40, 924, 000 
42,242.000 
53,790,000 
64,616.000 
85,631.000 
94.900.000 
88,800,000 
82,790.000 
73,576,000 
54. 610, 000 
37,676,000 


1904-5. 


1905-6. 


1906-7. 


July 

August . . . 
September 
October.. . 
November 
December. 
January. . 
February. 

March 

April 

May 

June 


Bushels. 

26,786.000 

31,436.000 

33,579,000 

44,217,000 

67,490.000 

78. 352. 000 

80,769,000 

81,348,000 

76,336,000 

67.954.000 

52, 585. 000 

36, 040, 000 


Bit 
24, 
21, 
22. 
33] 
49. 
59, 


shels. 

142,000 
480,000 
824,000 
043.000 
269,000 
050,000 
961,000 
818.000 
459.000 
639.000 
307. 000 
685,000 


Bushels. 
21,131,000 

19,508,000 
20,905.000 
29.  230.  000 
41,252,000 
54.387,000 
56. 892, 000 
54.  597, 000 
52,907.000 
46, 865, 000 
40.158.000 
28,532,000 


Bushels. 
20.  476. 000 
21.314.000 
21,705.000 
28,894,000 
53,745.000 
62, 402, 000 
71.634.000 
73,151,000 
70, 530. 000 
66, 599. 000 
54, 856. 000 
40.347.000 


Bushels. 
33.810.000 
39.633.000 
43.611.000 
56. 907.  (K)il 
45.  ii94. 000 
51.862.000 
56,137.000 
54,344.000 
51.338,000 
49,813,000 
52.482,000 


a  The  figures  for  stocks  east  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  represent  62  principal  points  of  accumulation, 
including  Manitoba  elevators  and  stocks  afloat  on  lakes  and  canals,  as  reported  by  Bradstreet's. 


554 


YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGBICULTUBE. 


1risible  supply  of  wheel  in  the  United  States  and  Canada,  first  of  each  month,  for  ten 

years — Continued. 

PACIFIC  COAST. 


Month. 

1897 

1898-99. 

1899-1900. 

1900-1901. 

1901-2. 

July  

Bushels. 

1,112.000  , 

2,  247. 000 
4.051,000 
6,251,000 
7,391,000  1 
6,944,000 
6.661.000 
5.318.000 
4,424.000 

3,  406.  000 
8.051,000 

_  6,000 

Bushels. 
2,935,000 

2,608,000 
3, 065.  COO 
4,071,000 
5,621,000 
0.269,000 
5,923,000 
5, 030, 000 
5, 104, 000 
4,321,000 
4.455,000 
3.635,000 

Bushels. 

3,409,000 
4,188,000 

6, 282, 000 
8, 858, 000 
11.0S5.000 
10,678,000 
9, 022. 000 
8,923,000 
7,814.000 
7,207,000 
7,09 
o. !  1 

Bushels. 

5,903.000 
5.770.000 
7.1S3.000 

10. 208, 000 
9, 983, 000 

10, 057. 000 
8,686.000 
8,717,000 
6, 972. 000 
6, 325, 000 
5.0S4.000 
4,672,000 

Bushels. 
3,228,000 

3, 935.  COO 

September 

4.260,000 
6,235.000 

November 

December 

January 

February 

March 

April 

Mav 

June 

7.262.000 
7.  878.  000 
7.186,000 
6,521,000 
5,  .542. 000 
5,428.000 
3, 685. 000 
3,139,000 

Month. 

1902-3. 

1903-4 

1904-5. 

1905-6. 

1906-7. 

July 

September 

October 

Bushels. 

2.725.000 

2.  345.  000 
3.024.000 
4,  737.  OCO 
4,719.000 
5,361.000 
4, 992. 000 
4,373.000 
3,435,000 

3,  M0, 000 
3. 6S3, 000 
2.546.000 

Bushels. 

1,775.000 
1 . 400, 000 
1.798,000 
3,  227.  000 
3.  U7.000 
3,591,000 
3, 282. 000 
2,689.000 
2,930,000 
2,472,000 
2,078.000 
2. 078. 000 

Bush  ft*. 
1.668,000 
1.351, OCO 
1,582 
4,106,000 
3,874,000 
8.733,000 
3,458,000 
3,051,000 
1,673 
2,486,000 
1.860,000 
1,461,000 

Bushels. 
839,000 

581.000 
1,130,000 
3,156,000 
4.486.000 
5.^66,000 
5.511.000 
5, 295. 000 
4  v  18,000 
4.621.000 
3. 017. OCO 
3,349.000 

Bushel*. 
2,586,000 

1,898.000 
1, 943, 000 
3.431.000 
3,459.000 

December 

January 

February 

March 

May                    

2,689.000 
2.047,000 
2,059.000 
1.744,000 
1,661,  COO 
1,731,000 

Statement  showing  th  amount  of  wheat  in  farmers'  hands,  the  visible  supply  of  the  United 
s  and  Canada,  and  of  tht  world,  on  March  1.  1892-1907. 


Year. 


Stocks  in  Visible  supply 

farmers'  hands  of  the  United     Visible  supply 
in  United  States  and        of  the  world! 

States.  Can 


Bushels. 

1892                  171,070,881 

1893 135  _ 

1894 114.  059,  560 

]  895 71 

1896  123, 045, 290 

1897 88. 149,  072 

1898     121 

1899 198.  050.  4:  0 

1900      '        158,  745, 595 

1901      128,098,074 

1902 173,  702.  5S3 

1903 164,  047.  100 

1904         132, 60S,  382 

I'd.-,           111.  054. 050 

1906 158, 403, 478 

1907 206. 64 1 .  70S 


Bushels. 
68.007,000 
110.693,000 
105.863,000 
110.546.000 
98,834,000 
63,521,000 
49,445,000 
.56.  189, 000 
91,749.000 
31  J  72.  000 
88,332.000 
79,771,000 
58, 389, 000 
54,580.000 
75,42 
.53,OS2.000 


Bushels. 
181,400,000 
229.300,000 
222.  400, 000 
212,400,000 
0191.900,00 
155.  .500, 000 
140, 6C0. 000 
151,100,000 
LSI.- 500. 000 
192.  700.000 
191, 900.  COO 
163.700,000 
1.v\ikj0,C00 
165.400.000 
193."- 
19S,  020,  COO 


STATISTICS    OF    WHEAT. 


555 


Condition  oj  the  wheat  crop  of  the  United  States,  monthly,  1888-1907. 


Decem- 
ber of 

Winter  wheat. 

Spring 

wheat. 

Year. 

When 

When 

April. 

May. 

June. 

inly. 

har- 

June. 

July. 

August. 

har- 

vested. 

vested. 

p.  a. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

1888 

95.9 

82.0 

73.1 

73.3 

75.  6 

77.4 

92.8 

95. 9 

87.3 

77.2 

1889 

90.8 
95.3 

94.0 
81.0 

96.0 

80.0 

93.1 
78.  1 

92.0 

7ti.  2 

89.4 
73.5 

94.4 
91.3 

83.3 
94.4 

81.2 
83.2 

83.8 

1890 

79.8 

1891 

98.4 

96.9 

97.9 

96.6 

96.  2 

96.7 

92.6 

94.1 

95.  5 

97.  2 

1892 

85.3  ■ 

81.2 

84.0 

88.3 

89.6 

87.6 

92.3 

90.9 

87.3 

81.2 

1893 

87.4  : 

77.4 

75.3 

75.  5 

77.7 

a  74.0 

86.4 

74.1 

67.0 

1894 

91.5  ; 

86.7 

81.4 

83.2 

83.9 

a  83.  7 

88.0 

68.4 

67.1 

1895 

89.0 

•81.4 

82.  9 

71.1 

65.8 

a  ;:,.  4 

97.8 

1.12.  2 

95.9 

189G 

81.4 

77.  1 

82.  7 

77.9 

75.  6 

a  74.  6 

99.9 

93.3 

78.9 

1897 

99.5  : 

81.4 

80.2  ; 

78.5 

81.2 

a85.7 

89.6 

91.2 

86.7 

1898 

86.7 

77.9 

86.5  ; 
76.2  ! 

90.8 

67.  3 

85.7 
65.6 

a  86.  7 
a  70.  9 

100.9 
91.4 

95.0 

91.7 

96.5 
83.6 

1S99 

92.  0 

1900 

97.1  1 

82.1 

88.9  i 

82.  7 

80.8 

a  09.  6 

87.3 

55.  2 

56.4 

1901 

97.1 

91.7 

94.1 

87.8 

88.3 

a82.8 

92.0 

95.  o 

80.3 

1902 

8G.  7 

78.7 

76.  4 

76.1 

77.0 

a  80.0 

95.4 

92.  4 

89.7 

1903 

99.  7 

97.3 

92.6 

82.2 

78.8 

a74.7 

95.  9 

82.5 

77.1 

1904 

86.6 

76.  5 

76.  5 

'   77.7 

78.7 

93.4 

93.7 

87.5 

66.2 

1903 

82.9 

91.6 

92.  5 

85.  5 

82.7 

93.7 

91.0 

89.2 

87.3 

1906 

94.1 

89.1 

90.9 

82.  7 

85.6 

93.4 

91.4 

86.9 

83.4 

1907. 

94.  1 

89.9 

82.9 



. 

o  Includes  both  winter  and  spring. 


Acreage,  production 

,  valw 

.  juice*,  am!  ,  tpoi 

is  of  icheat 

'n  the 

United  States,  1S6C-1906. 

Aver- 
age 

Chicago  cash  price  per 
bushel. 

Domestic 

Aver- 

exports, in- 

Year. 

Acreage. 

age 
yield 
per 

Production. 

price 
per 

Farm  value, 
Dec.  1. 

December. 

May  of 
following 

cluding 

flour,  fiscal 

year  be- 

acre. 

el, 
Dec.  1. 

ginning 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

July  1. 

Acres. 

Bush. 

Bushels. 

Cents. 

Dollars. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

a?. 

Cts. 

Bushels. 

1866 

15,  424, 496 

9.9 

151,999,906 

152.  7 

232,109,630 

129 

145 

185 

211 

12, 646, 941 

1867 

18,321,561 

11.6 

212,441,400 

145.2 

308,387,146 

126 

140 

134 

101 

25.2S4.S03 

1868 

18, 460. 132 

12.1 

224, 036, 600 

108.5 

243, 032. 746 

80 

88 

87 

96 

29,717,201 

1869 

19,181.004 

13.6 

260.146,900 

i  u. .) 

199.024.9iin 

63 

76 

79 

92 

53,900,780 

1870 

18,992,591 

12.4 

235, 884. 700 

94.4 

222,766,969 

91 

98 

113 

120 

52, 580, 111 

1871 

19,943,893 

11.6 

230, 722. 400 

114.5 

264,075,851 

107 

111 

120 

143 

38,995,755 

1872 

20, 858, 359 

11.9 

249.997,100 

111.4 

278.522.068 

97 

108 

112 

122 

52,014.715 

1873 

22,171,676 

12.7 

281,254,700 

106.  9 

300,669,528 

96 

ion 

105 

114 

91,510.398 

1874 

24,967,027 

12.3 

308, 102.  700 

86.3 

265.881.167 

78 

83 

78 

94 

72,912.817 

1875 

26,381,512 

11.1 

292, 136, 000 

89.5 

261,396,926 

82 

91 

89 

100 

74,750,682 

1876 

27,627,021 

10.5 

289,356,500 

96.3 

27s.:l;i7.23S 

104 

117 

130 

172 

57, 043, 936 

1877 

26, 277, 546 

13.9 

364,  l'J4.14ii 

105.  7 

385,089.444 

103 

108 

98 

113 

92,071,726 

1878 

32, 108, 560 

13.1 

420. 122,  400 

77.11 

325,814.119 

81 

84 

91 

102 

150, 502, 506 

1879 

32,545,950 

13.8 

448,750.630 

110.8 

497,030.142 

12'7 

133^ 

112.'. 

119 

180,  304, 180 

1880 

37,986,717 

13.1 

49S,  549. 868 

95.1 

474.201,850 

931 

109} 

101 

112? 

180,321,514 

1881 

37,709,020 

10.2 

383, 280, 090 

119.2 

456, 880, 427 

1241 

129 

123 

140 

121,892,389 

1882 

37,067,194 

13.  6 

504, 185,  470 

88.4 

445, 602, 125 

9i; 

94} 

108 

113? 

147,811.316 

1883 

36, 455.593 

11.  6 

421,086.160 

91.1 

383,649.272 

94? 

99> 

85 

94} 

111,534,1S2 

1884 

39, 475, 885 

13.0 

512,765,000 

64.5 

330, 862, 260 

69J 

76* 

853 

90} 

132, 570. 366 

1883 

34, 189, 246 

10.4 

357,112,000 

77.  1 

275, 320, 390 

82? 

89 

72* 

79 

94,565,793 

1886 

36, 806. 184 

12.4 

457,218,000 

68.7 

314,22(1,020 

75* 

79J 

80} 

88} 

153, 804, 969 

1887 

37,641,783 

12.1 

456, 329, 000 

68.1 

310,612,960 

75* 

79| 

811 

891 

119, 625. 344 

1888 

37, 336, 138 

11.  1 

415.868.000 

92.6 

385,24S,030 

90* 

105* 

"i 

95* 

88,600,742 

1889 

38,123,859 

12.  9 

490,560,000 

69.8 

342.491,707 

76| 

8O.1 

89} 

100 

109, 430. 467 

1890 

36,087,154 

11.1 

399,262,000 

83.8 

334. 773. 678 

m 

923 

98? 

108 

106,181,316 

1891 

39,916,897 

15.3 

611,780.000 

83.9 

513,472,711 

89jf 

931 

80 

85} 

225,665,812 

1892 

38, 554,  430 

13.4 

515,949,000 

62.4 

322,111,881 

l.'.l'. 

73 

08} 

76} 

191,912,635 

1893 

34, 629,  418 

11.4 

396,131,725 

53.8 

213,171,381 

591 

64£ 

52* 

60| 

164, 283, 129 

1894 

34,882,436 

13.2 

460,267,416 

49.1 

225,902.025 

•52} 

63| 

60} 

851 

144,812,718 

1895 

34,047.332 

13.7 

467,102.947 

50.9 

237.938,998 

53^ 

64} 

57* 

67? 

120.443,968 

1896 

34,618,646 

12.4 

427,684,346 

72.  il 

310. 602, 539 

74J 

93| 

0SJ 

971 

145,124.972 

1897 

39,465,066 

13.4 

530, 149, 168 

80.8 

428,547,121 

92 

109 

117 

185 

217,306.005 

1898 

44.055,278 

15.  3 

675,148,705 

5S.  2 

392, 770, 320 

62J 

70 

681 

79£ 

222, 61S, 420 

1899 

44,592,516 

12.  3 

547, 303, 846 

58.4 

319,545,259 

04 

69| 

63? 

67i 

186.096,762 

1900 

42, 495, 385 

12.3 

522, 229.  505 

61.9 

323,515,177 

69J 

74? 

70 

75J 

215.990,073 

1901 

49,895,514 

15.0 

748,460,218 

62.4 

467, 350, 156 

73 

79i 

72? 

76} 

234.772.516 

1902 

46,202.424 

14.5 

670,063,008 

63.0 

422,224,117 

VIS 

771 

74} 

80? 

202.905,598 

1903 

49,  464, 967 

12.9 

637,821,835 

69.5 

443,024,826 

77} 

87 

873 

101J 

120.727,013 

1904 

44,074,875 

12.5 

552,399,517 

92.4 

510, 489, 874 

115 

122 

89£ 

113} 

44,112,910 

1905 

47,854.079 

14.5 

692, 979, 489 

74.8 

518, 372, 727 

82£ 

90 

801 

87} 

97,609,007 

1906 

47,305,829 

15.5 

735, 260, 970 

66.7 

490, 332, 760 

q 

75 

556 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Acreage,  production,  value,  and  distribution  of  wheat  in  the    United  States  in  1906,  by 

States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Maine 

Vermont 

New  York 

•  New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia 

North  Carolina , 

South  Carolina 

Georgia 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota 

South  Dakota 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Texas 

Indian  Territory 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Arizona 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 

United  States  . 


Crop  of  1900. 


Acreage. 


A cres. 

8,038 

1,388 

467,509 

111,093 

1,642,553 

121,745 

806,401 

744, 546 

384,241 

582,091 

318,281 

316, 107 

2,117,750 

2, 322, 750 

1,976,200 

1,041,600 

288.040 

5,119,412 

585, 660 

2,144,250 

5, 992, 000 

3,131,000 

2, 376, 560 

5,422,508 

818, 624 

871,418 

98, 639 

1,761 

1,228,364 

240, 849 

1,333,133 

177,338 

137, 389 

30,352 

254,355 

44,826 

15,542 

178,417 

27,604 

336, 736 

1,204,201 

712,411 

1,572,144 


47,305,S29 


Production. 


Bushels 
199, 342 
30 

9,350 

2,033 
29, 073 

1,947 
12, 902 

9,306 

4,879 

5,297 

2,960 

3,161 
43, 202 
48, 080 
38, 535 
13, 644 

4,690 
55, 801 

9,212 
31,734 
77, 896 
41,955 
52, 288 
81,830 
11,542 
10, 892 

1,085 

17 

14,126 

2,890 
18, 663 

1,915 

3,297 
871 

8,266 

1,120 
391 

4,888 
869 

8,231 
25,075 
14,215 
26, 883 


735, 260, 970 


Dollars. 

201,335 

26, 619 

7,667,148 

1,626,402 

22,095,623 

1,383,023 

9,160,715 

7, 538, 528 

3,952,687 

4,926,236 

3, 256, 045 

3,224,291 

30,673,491 

33, 656, 648 

26,589,771 

9,824,371 

3, 377, 387 

36,271,034 

5, 895, 820 

21,262,383 

49,074,480 

25, 592, 794 

29, 804, 554 

47,461,754 

8,426,097 

8, 496, 326 

1,019,927 

15,321 

10,877,163 

1,791,917 

10, 265, 124 

1,436,438 

2,110,295 

635, 904 

5,373,250 

930, 140 

403, 408 

3, 177, 607 

739,097 

4,938,979 

15, 546, 660 

9,443,222 

20,162,746 


490,332,760 


Stock  in  farmers' 
hands  March  1,  1907. 


Shipped  out 

of  county 

where 

grown. 


Bushels. 

69, 770 

9,595 

3, 646, 570 

609,901 

11,629,275 

681,772 

3, 483, 652 

2,978,184 

1,610,354 

1,748,019 

651,209 

727,046 

15,120,735 

12,501,040 

9,633,975 

3, 820, 589 

1,735,602 

16,740,477 

3, 132, 154 

7,299,027 

24,926,720 

12,167,066 

16,732,381 

21,275,959 

2, 308, 520 

3,049,963 

217,006 

0 

1,836,404 

462,430 

4, 665, 966 

497,965 

1,220,014 

348, 441 

2,479,961 

280, 162 

86, 165 

1,955,450 

260,858 

2,634,122 

4,262,794 

2, 843, 119 

4,301,386 


206,641,798 


Per  cent. 
35 
31 
39 
30 
40 
35 
27 
32 
33 
33 
22 
23 
35 
26 
25 
28 
37 
30 
34 
23 
32 
29 
32 
26 
20 
28 
20 
0 
13 
16 
25 
26 
37 
40 
30 
25 
22 
40 
30 
32 
17 
20 
16 


28.1 


Bushels. 

0 

0 

2.898,556 

406,600 

7,268,297 

1,051,877 

7,870,474 

2, 512, 843 

683, 181 

370, 792 

59,201 

94, 832 

22,465,092 

25,002,081 

19,267,950 

4,775,736 

422, 173 

39,619,130 

2,303,054 

15, 550, 101 

66,211,600 

32.725,212 

35,556,311 

63,009,570 

3,347,353 

3,049.963 

10,850 

0 

3,672,808 

1,410,192 

12, 318, 149 

114,915 

857,307 

43,  555 

4, 133,  269 

44, 826 

15,666 

1,564,360 

34,781 

4,609,713 

19,558,701 

7,818,578 

14,517,177 


427,252,826 


Acreage,  production,  and  farm  value  on  December  1  of  winter  and  spring  ivhcat  in  the 

United  States  in  1906. 


Winter  wheat. 

Spring  wheat. 

State  or  Terri- 
tory. 

Acreage. 

2 

a    . 
•r*  c 

o  o 

< 

PI 

Average  farm 
price,  Dec.  1. 

Farm 
value, 
Dec.  1. 

Acreage. 

2 
"»  . 

a  u 

be  a 

< 

Produc- 
tion. 

Mi 
2  °> 

Fa  rm 
value, 

Dec.  1. 

Acres. 

Bu. 

Bushels.    Cts. 

Dollars. 

Acres. 
8,038 
1,388 

Bu. 
24.8 
22.3 

Busheh. 
199, 342 
30, 952 

Cts. 
101 

Dollars. 
•>m  -«5 

86           26, 619 

New  York 

467, 509 
111,093 

1,642,553 
121,745 
806,401 
744, 546 
384, 241 
582,091 
318,284 
316, 107 

2, 117,  750 

20.0 
18.3 
17.7 
16.0 

9, 350, 180!     82 

2,033,002;     80 

29,073,188     76 

1.947.920      71 

7,667,148 
1,626,402 

22,095,623 
1,383,023 
9, 160, 715 
7,538,528 
3,952,687 
4,926,236 
3,256,045 
3, 224, 291 

30, 673,  491 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Maryland 

16.0    12. 902.4161     71 

Virginia 

12.5 
12.7 
9.1 
9.3 

9,306,825     81 
4, 879, 861 !     81 
5,297,028!     93 
2.960.041     110 

West  Virginia 

i 

North  Carolina  . . . 

South  Carolina . . . 

Georgia 

10.0     3,161,070    102 
20.4    43,202,100     71 

.. 

Ohio 



STATISTICS    OF    WHEAT. 


557 


Acreage,  production,  and  farm  value  on  December  1  of  winter  and  spring  wheat  in  the 
United  States  in  1906 — Continued. 


State  or  Terri- 
tory. 


Winter  wheat. 


Spring  wheat. 


Acreage. 


ti  ■ 


Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota. 
South  Dakota. 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi. 


Produc- 
tion. 


Acres.      Bu.     Bushels.    'Cts 


2,322,750  20.7  48,080,925 

1,976,200!  19.5  38,535,900 

1,041,600!  13.1  13,644,960 

62,440,  18.4  1,148,896 


65,660j  22.3;     1,464,218 
2,144,2501  14.8   31,734,900 


2,041,560   23.2    47,364,192 

5,131,800    15.3.  78,516,540 

818,624!   14.!    n,. 342, 598 

871,418'  12.5    10,892,725 

98,639    ll.O!     1,085,029 

1,761    10.0  17,610 

Texas..." 1,228,364    11.5    14,126,186 

Indian  Territory  .        240,84912.0     2,890,188 

Oklahoma 1,333,133    14.0    18,663,862 

Arkansas 177,338    10.  S     1,915,250 

Montana 

Wyoming ' 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 
Arizona 

Utah 


Farm 
value. 
Dec.  1. 


Acreage. 


Dollars.       Acres.      Bu. 

33,656,648  

26,589,771 

9,824,371 

827, 205 


937, 100 1 
21,262,383' 


225,600    15.7 
5,119,412    10.9 

520,000    14.9 


Produc- 
tion. 


\>  si 


Farm 
value, 
Dec.  1. 


Bushels.  \Cts.    Dollars. 


3,541,920:     72     2,550,182 

55,801,591      65   36,271,034 

7,74S,OO0     64     4,958,720 


57    26,997,589 

58j  45,539,593 
731  8,426,097 
8, 4%,  326 
1,019,927 
15,321 
10,877,163 
1,791,917 
10,265,124 
1,436,438 


5,992,000  13.0  77,896,000 

3,131,000  13.4  41,955,400 

335,000  14.7  4,924,500 

290,708,  11.4;  3,314,071 


63  49,074,480 

61  25,592,794 

57  2,806,965 

58  1,922,161 


Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington. .. 

Oregon '       364,251    22.3 

California '  1,572,144   17.1 


167,545 
327,315 


25.4 
24.1 


4,255,643 
7,888,292 
8,122,797 

26,883,662 


United  States.  29, 599, 961 ;  16.  7  492,888,004 


2,553,386 

4,890,741 

5,361,046 

20,162,746 


68. 3  336, 435, 081  17,  705, 868 


137, 3S9    24.0 

30,352    28.7 
254, 355 

44,826 

15,542 
178,417 

27,604 
169, 191 

S7li,S8H 

348, 160 


32. 5 
25.0 
25.2 
27.4 
31.5 
23.5 
19.6 
17.5 


297,336 
871,102 
266,538 
120, 650 
391,658 
888, 626 
869, 526| 
975,988 
186,966 
092, 800 


242, 372, 966  63. 5  153, 897, 679 


2,110,295 
635,904 

5, 373, 250 
930, 140 
403,408 

3,177,607 
739, 097 

2, 385, 593 
10,655,919 

4,082,176 


Average  yield  of  wheat  in  certain  countries,  in  bushels  per  acre,  1896-1905. 


Year. 

United 
States. 

Russia. 

Ger- 
many. 

Austria. 

Hungary. 

France. 

United 
King- 
dom. 

1S96 .• 

12.4 
13.4 
15.3 
12.3 
12.3 
15.0 
14.5 
12.9 
12.5 
14.5 

9.0 
7.3 
9.8 

9.1 
8.1 
7.9 
11.1 
10.6 
11.5 
10.2 

(6) 

26.4 
25.3 
27.2 
28.4 
27.9 
23.5 
30.3 
29.3 
29.4 
28.6 

(b) 
15.9 
13.2 
18.0 
18.9 
15.5 
16.7 
19.0 
17.7 
19.5 
19.6 

(b) 
19.4 
11.7 
17.1 
17.8 
16.9 
15.1 
20.7 
19.0 
16.3 
18.4 

(«) 

20.0 
15.1 
21.1 
21.2 
19.2 
18.5 
20.2 
22.8 
19.3 
20.8 

34.7 

1897 

30.0 

1898 

35.8 

1899 

33.8 

1900 

1901 

1902 

1903 

1904 

1905 

29.5 
31.9 
33.9 
31.1 
27.8 
33.9 

13. 5              9. 5 

27.6 

17.4 

17.2 

19.  8               32-  2 

a  Winchester  bushels. 


b  Bushels  of  60  pounds. 


558 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Average  yitbt  per  aire  of  wheat  in  the  United  State?.  .  by  States. 


State  or  Territory- 


1399.      1900.      1901.      1E02.      1903.      1904.  .  1905.      1506. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire. 

Vermont 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia 

North  Carolina . . . 
South  Carolina . . . 

Georgia 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

iri 

North  Dakota 

South  Dakota 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Texas 

d  Territory. 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Arizona 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 


Bush. 
16.  5 

10.0 
17.0 
20.0 

21.4 

•    I 

19.7 

21.5 

la  2 

12.0 
13.4 

8.0 

B.7 

I 

16.9 

13.0 

7.9 
15.6 
12.5 
13.0 
13.0 

9.0 
10.3 

• 
14.5 
15.  5 
13.  G 
11.2 
10.0 
10.0 


19.0 
10.5 
32.5 
25.0 
24.0 
24.0 
13.0 
21.0 
24.3 
22.0 
23.5 
17.0 
10.0 


Bush. 
19.5 
19.0 
22.5 
20.0 
21.2 
17.4 
17.5 
13.3 
15.3 
14.1 
13.8 
- 
10.6 
10.0 
1  6.  9 
15.6 
11.0 
- 

18. « 
15.  3 

14.4 
12.4 
16.4 
14.2 
15.4 
13.2 
12.  0 
13.9 


Bush. 
22. 5 

17.  2 
22.0 
IS.  3 
18.5 
14.5 

-  ■ 
14.1 

8.4 
9.3 

6.5 
6.8 

14.2 
9.  > 
10.0 
3.4 
15.  5 
13.4 
13.0 
9.9 

-  ■ 
10.7 
10.3 

9.3 
9.1 
B.7 
" 

1L1 


Bush. 

19.5 

16.3 

23.5 

2L8 

17.7 

19.1 

13.5 

20.3 

19.5 

11.9 

9.8 

9.6 

9.0 

9.1 

6.0 

5.3 

13.0 

" 
15.  5 
10.5 

12.5 
4.9 

6.9 
12.0 
17.7 
13.0 
9.9 
9.5 
9.G 
IS.  4 


Bush. 
23. 9 


Bum.   Bush. 
23. 3       23. 0 


■   ■ 


2a  9       25.1 


14.9 
11.0 
29.5 

_  : 
i 

23.8 
31.7 
2S.0 
29.0 
31.0 
24.  2 
20.5 
9.1 


13.3 
8.6 

25.7 
If  • 
23.7 
■ 
15.3 

mi 

13.0 
24.2 
22.7 
19.2 
14.1 


19.0 

10.1 

2 

17.  G 

__ 

21.0 

14.6 

2a  9 

24.5 

_     ■ 

23.5 

13.8 

10.3 


13.1 
16.8 

17.1 

; 

17.2 
10.9 
10.9 

8.7 
8.8 

■  . 
15.3 

i  ■ 
17.6 
11.1 

12.  9 

13.1 

17.1 

13.  5 
12.1 
10.8 

8.8 
8.9 

16.4 
8.8 

2a  s 

24.5 
24.1 
21.5 
21.8 
20.5 
25.1 
21  2  I 

- 

21.1 
13.0  . 


16.8 

16. 0 

15.8 
16.5 

14.7 
5.7 

5.3 
5.6 

6.0 

17.1 
1^0 
17.9 

18.1 

13.9 
12.7 
19. 9 
15.9 

12.2 
20.9 

ia4 

as 

■  . 

6.0 

8.0  I 

9.0 
12.3 
11.1 

9.1 

2:15 
13.0 
17.1 

lv7 
21.2 

27. 1 
22.1 
22.  2 

io!o 

ltt9 


J  ■ 
14.0 
15.6 
10.2 
12.5 

■  " 
10.2 

5.1 

- 
13.7 

iao 

■  - 

15.5 

13.1 
12.4 

■  1 
12.7 
I 

15.7 
14.1 

N4 

7.1 

9.1 

&0 

13.4 

12.0 

14.9 

7.0 

_■   _ 

20.9 

In  4 

25.3 

22.'. 

27 

21.1 

20.3 

11.2 


11.3 
13.3 

14.1 
14.9 
13.4 
10.2 
10.1 
8.6 
8.1 

11.5 

- 

15.5 
12.8 
11.6 
17.7 

- 

13.6 

12.4 
11.4 
11.5 
10.3 
8.8 
10.7 
14.1 
11.7 
10.1 
23.9 
22.1 
22.8 
12  ■ 
25.  5 

.  I 
22.9 

Iao 

10.8 


Bu->h. 
24   - 


22.3 


21.0 

16.4 
17.1 
13.3 
16.3 
11.4 
12.3 
I 

17.1 
13.3 
16.0 

■     ! 

13.3 
14.2 
12.4 
14.0 

13.7 

13.9 
11.3 
7.2 
9.6 

10.8 
S.9 

iao 
a2 

7.9 
23.8 
25.4 
25.0 

24  A 

2 

27.0 
23.2 
24 

ia6 

9.3 


General  average 13.  4  >     15.  3       12.  3       12. 3       15. 0 


12.9       12.5       14.5 


20.0 

- 
17  : 

16. 0 
16.0 

12.5 
12.7 

ai 

9.3 
10.0 

-  - 
20.7 

13.1 

10.9 
15.7 
14.8 
13.0 
13.4 
22.0 
15.1 
14.1 
12.5 
11.0 

iao 

1L5 
12.0 
14.0 

10.8 
24.0 

32.5 
25.0 
ZS  . 
23  4 
31.5 
24.4 
20.8 
20.0 
17.1 

15.5 


Averane  value  per  acre  of  wheat  in  tl  v  I  upon  farm  value  December  1, 

1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territorv. 


1897.      1398.      1599.      1900.     -1901. 


1904.      1905.      1906. 


Maine $17. 

New  Hampshire 17. 

Vermont 17. 

Connecticut 20. 

New  York 19. 

New  Jersey 17. 

Pennsylvania 17. 

re 20. 

Maryland 1". 

Virginia 11. 

West  Virginia 11. 

North  Carolina 7. 

South  Carolina 10. 

Georgia 9. 

Ohio 14. 

Indiana 11. 

Illinois 7. 

Michigan 13. 

-in 10. 

Minnesota 10. 

Iowa 9. 

Missouri 7. 

North  Dakota 7. 

South  Dakota 5.i 

Nebraska 10.  ( 


4. 

$20.47 

$17. 55 

■«23. 13 

r24.99 

S24.23 

- 

tests 

rJI 

17  48 

20.25 

16. 34 
18.70 

15.00 

H 

i  1 

20.49 

19. 35 

-■ 

. 

m 

17.  ei) 
15.26 

- 
■ 

17.05 

■■ 

i 

13.27 

14.42 

12.32 

16.40 

m 

12.70 

10.88 

14.13 

12.10 

12.16 

11.43 

14.  »3 

14. 43 

14.64 

S3 

- 

J 

12.31 

11.53 

12.32 

15.23 

13.45 

21 

9.13 

14.21 

13.13 

12. 33 

" 

11.32 

11.38 

W 

10.71 

9.59 

12.21 

10.58 

•- 

14.20 

13.37 

11.36 

"4 

9.31 

5.30 

-    57 

7.96 

4.50 

7.31 

11.12 

10.03 

10. 12 

99 

9.80 

6.60 

i  .rto 

-     " 

6.31 

■      1 

11.01 

10.95 

10.29 

52 

"     ■ 

5.49 

1   37 

7.13 

4.88 

10.23 

6.83 

3.48 

27 

9.96 

9.09 

8.62 

5.71 

6.56 

10. 21 

n 

10.23 

•■> 

■ 

6.66 

•      ■ 

5.88 

5.95 

11.09 

7.38 

10.20 

93 

11. 15 

9.09 

- 

12.14 

10.96 

12.  65 

14.02 

■ 

9.83 

27 

3.71 

11.06 

10.88 

1   • 

n 

15.01 

14.49 

6.30 

•     . 

12.14 

10. 56 

6.30 

13.94 

12.96 

13.31 

j 

- 

7.88 

12.21 

11.94 

10.58 

14.61 

9.43 

- 

.       - 

- 

9.92 

10.48 

11.61 

11.22 

15. 13 

11.73 

01 

■    : 

7.37 

_ 

7.74 

9.04 

11.14 

7.08 

8.68 

7.15 

9.20 

9.75 

6.96 

7.69 

10.48 

10.08 

10.07 

65 

'   '• 

a  14 

1    •■ 

10.97 

11.54 

11.23 

9.  30 

9.92 

. 

7.34 

- 

-    -• 

7.07 

9.22 

8.00 

9.56 

9.66 

8.19 

"_• 

6.20 

■    ■ 

4.00 

6.84 

6.95 

8.56 

1   '■ 

■ 

■     1 

OO 

7.71 

5.05 

6.36 

9.23 

10.23 

•    17 

11.  S3 

12.  -: 

12.54 

STATISTICS    OF    "WHEAT. 


559 


Average  value  per  acre  of  v heat  in  (he  United  States,  based  upon  farm  value  December  1, 
1897-1906,  by  Staffs— Continued. 


State  or  Territory. 


1897.      1898 


1899.       1900.      1901.      1902.      1903. 


Kansas $11. 47 

Kent  ucky I  12. 10 

Tennessee 10. 04 

Alabama 10. 10 

Mississippi 9. 90 

Texas 14.06 

Indian  Territory 

Oklahoma 14. 44 

Arkansas 8.82 

Montana 22. 10 

Wyoming 17.  .50 

Colorado 16.80 

New  Mexico 18.00 

Arizona 13. 32 

Utah 14.28 

Nevada 21.87 

Idaho 15.40 

Wa  shington 15. 98 

Oregon 12. 24 

California 8. 30 


S7.10 
9.53 
8. 84 
10.80 
11.54 
10.00 


7.75 
6.38 
17.11 
16.35 
14.73 

14.  76 

15.  12 
27.55 
15.  SI 
13.07 

12.71 
6.55 


$5.10 
6.01 
6. 79 
6.  76 
6.01  i 
7.55 


$9.73 
8.97 
7.82 

8.45 
8.06 
11.78 


7.05 
5.50 
15.68 
12.(» 
13.51 
8.42 
9.79  I 
10.97  i 
13.68 
12. 10 
11.58 
10. 18 
8.74  I 


10.07 
6. 57 
16.23 
13.38 
13.33 
14.28 
11.53 
11.49 
17.15 
9.57 
11.99 
7.59 
5.97 


S10.92 
8.71 

7.99 
[  7.66 

7.57 
i  6.94 

8.42 
10.33 

17.70 
16.91 
10. 15 
15.48 
I  18.53 
14. 36 
22. 09 
12.93 
13. 07 
11.37 
7.80 


S5.  73 
6.88 
5.  47 

5.5S 
6.80 
0.  03 
7.50 
0.44 
0. 10 
16. 12 
19.04 
13.  .50 
14.71 
19.  04 
10.11 
25.56 
15.44 
14.44 
13.37 


58.33 

6.80 

5.96 

8.65 

7.44 

10.45 

8.28 

9.39 

5.40 

18.61 

1.5.  47 

17.56 

13.80 

23.53 

18.08 

27.32 

1.5.  Ni 

14.04 

13. 9S 

9.74 


411.06 
12.  43 
12.77 
11.85 
8. 89 
11.77 
13.82 

j  10.88 

|  10.20 
21.2s 

1  19.89 
22.  7.5 
13. 57 
28  K 
22.  88 
24. 10 
IS.  34 
17.77 
1.5.37 

<     9.50 


9.83 

6.55 

9.70 

10.26 

7.  s3 

7.70 

5.66 

7.11 

10. 90 

18.29 

17.50 

19.98 

20.  21 

17.69 

20.79 

18.49 

16. 13 

7.03 


$8.75 

10.29 

9.75 

10.34 

S.70 

8.85 

7.44 

7.70 

S.  10 

1.5.30 

20.95 

21.13 

20.7.5 

17.81 
2...  77 
14.00 
12.91 
13.20 
12.  82 


General  average 10.  S6       8. 92 


7.61       9.37       9.14       8.66      11.5s     10.  S3       10.37 


Averegi  farm  price  of  wheat  per  bushel  in  the  United  States,  December  1.  1897-1906,  by 

States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Maine I 

New  Hampshire 1. 10 

Vermont 1.  04 

Connecticut 1. 00 

Now  York  .90 

New  Jersey 93 

Pennsylvania 91 

Delaware 94 

Maryland 93 

Virginia 92 

West  Virginia 89 

North  Carolina 94 

South  Carolina 1.  18 

03 


Georgia 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota... 
South  Dakota... 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Texas 

Indian  Territory 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Arizona 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon." 

California 


Is-v 


S0.S9 
.92 
.90 
.88 
.72 
.73 
.68 
.69 
.70 
.66 
.71 
.78 
.94 
.98 
.66 
.03 
.60 
.64 
.59 
.54 
.  .52 
.59 
.51 
.50 
.47 
.50 
.62 
.67 
.90 
.83 
.68 


General  average 


1899.      1900. 


SO.  91 
.95 

.95 


so.eo 

.92 
.78 
.82 
.77 
74 
.72 
.70 
.71 
.72 
.77 
.82 
1.01 
.95 
.71 
.70 
.i.4 
.69 
.04 
.03 
.59 
.63 
..58 
.58 
.53 

.69 
.79 
.89 
.84 
.64 


1901.      1902.      1903.      1904. 


SO.  97     SO.  92 

"  "i."6y 


.  94 


.72 
.71 
.71 

.73 
.77 


SI.  04 

l.'lo" 


.7v) 
.70 
.73 
.7.5 
.72 
.79 
.82 
.92 

1.02 
.98 
.71 
.68 
.59 
.69 
.64 
.61 
.  55 
.58 
58 
.57 
.49 
.  55 
.74 
.70 
.93 
.85 
.77 
.01 
.58 
.07 
.02 
.si 
.  ,5 
.86 

1.  05 
.70 
.98 
.70 
.  05 


.81 
.82 
.79 
.78 
.79 
.84 
.85 
.97 
1.01 
.96 
.80 
.78 
.75 
.77 
.72 
.69 
.'•2 
.71 
.63 
.1.2 
.54 
.59 
.81 
.84 
.95 
.93 


.584       .619  i     .624  I     .630  j     .695 


1.09 

1.10 

l.OS 

1.08 

1.06 

1.09 

1.09 

1.19 

1.26 

1.26 

1.10 

1.00 

1.01 

1.08 

.98 

.87 

.90 

.96 

.81 

.79 

.87 

.86 

1.09 

1.11 

1.15 

1.01 

1.10 

.98 

.93 

1.01 

.89 

.90 

.91 

1.06 

1.13 

.86 

.92 

.80 

.  80 

.81 


SI.  00       SI.  01 


1.02 
1.11 
1.07 
.82 
.82 
.81 
.79 
.70 
.71 
.71 
.79 
.69 
.07 

.71 
.87 
.91 
1.01 
.95 


.90 
.71 
.72 
.70 
.90 
1.17 
.67 
.77 
.66 

.68 
.82 


1906. 


.82 

.80 

.70 
.71 
.71 
.81 
.81 
.93 
1.10 
1.02 
.71 
.70 
.69 
.72 
.72 
.65 
.04 
.07 
.63 
.01 
.57 
.58 
.73 
.78 
.94 
.s7 
.77 
.62 
.55 
.75 
.04 
.73 
.  65 
.83 
1.03 

.85 
.60 
.  62 
.66 
.75 


.667 


560 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Wholesale  prices  of  wheat  per  bushel  in  leading  cities  of  the,  United  States,  1901-1906. 


Date. 


]901. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November. .. . 
December 

1902. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1903. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1904. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November.. . . 
December 

1905. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. . . 

October 

November. .. 
December . . . 


New  York. 


No.  2,  red 
winter. 


Low.llligh. 


.79J.S0.83J 


.s.v; 
.851 
.82 
.82 
.  88  i 
.87-; 
.70: 
.71; 
.731 
.73? 
.76 
•  76| 


.78-1 
■MS 
.78* 
.79" 
.81J 
.85 
.80] 
.833 
.si,' 
.821 
.833 
.S9J 


.92*. 

.94 
1.01 
1.04 
1.06 
1.04 
1.00 
1.00 
1.08 
1.13} 
1.17} 
1.16 


1.18 

1.20} 

1.1U 

.91'. 

-Qi  i 

1.03| 

.90 

•  842 
.858 
.88' 
.90 
.923 


.Nl> 
.82  J 
.841 
.84| 
.  85 1 
.793 
.80* 
.77| 

•  sol 

.83* 
.  89j 


.84 
•  83J 

.8(1', 

.89" 
.87 
■  89| 
.89[ 
.89*. 

.9ir 

.92 
.99 


Baltimore. 


Chicago. 


Southern,    No. 1,  north- 
No.  2,  red.     ern  spring. 


Low.  High 


SO.  73,' 
.76 

.77; 

.7(1'. 
■  78  J 
.72 
.693 
.72 
.78'. 
.70T 
.74J 
.78*. 


.  s  1 3 

.80 

.76 

.75 

.81 

.76 

.703 

.66} 

.68 

.69 

.71} 

.71} 


.77| 
.78} 
.79 
.78} 
.76J 
.79 
.78} 
.80* 
.  82| 
.85" 


1.01 
1.15 
1.11 
1.101 

1.20 
1.15} 

1.16 

1 .  203 
1.25} 
1.26} 

1.253 
1.24} 


1.253 
1.25* 
1.212 
1.15 
1.11} 
1.14} 
1.09} 
.9lj 

.'112 

.99 
.98} 
1.01 


.94 
.99 
.98*. 
.  99 ' 
.82 
.82 
.88? 
1.03} 
1.13 
1.08} 

1.083 


1.01 

1.01', 
.98 
.83 
.83} 

.73 
.75 
.76 
.  753 
.  7(1' 
.76" 
.78 


.85| 

.85 

.  85 '. 

.87* 

.83 

.813 

.74} 

.723 

.75* 

.77* 

.77" 


.83 

.81 

.81 

.83 

.  82 '. 

.82 

.81 
.83 

.83) 
.86 

.87 

.  88 


.94 
1.12 
1.05} 
1.05 
1.08 
1.03} 

.89 
1.09} 
1.14 
1.18 
1.15} 
1.15 


1.19* 

1.17 

1.141 

1.09* 

1.071 

1.031 

.92 

.84 

.84} 

.861 

.85} 

.87 


Low.  High, 


.71810.761 

.743 


.74 

•  721 
.693 
.70 
.72| 
.71} 
.71{ 
.6S} 
.70 
.67* 
.691 
.711 


.81} 

.86 

.88} 

.851 

.873 

.92 

.94* 

1.02 

1.16 

1.1.5 

1.15 

1.15 


1.18 
1.15 
1.12 

.88. 
.S9J 
1.07^ 
1.12 
1.03 
.88 
.86 
.85 
.82* 


.76} 

.741 

.  751 

.77} 

.713 

.77 

.il 

.711 

.733 

.  79* 


.  80* 

.761 

.76 

.763 

.76} 

.753 

.79 

.76 

.95 

.  751 

.771 

.77| 


.84 

.90} 

.93 

,88 

.86} 

.87 


.93 
1.10 
.98| 
.96" 
1.011 
1.00 
1  06 
1.20 
1.22 
1.22 
1.20 
1.22 


1.21 

1.24 

1.183 

1.18 

1.13 

1.20 

1.20 

1.15 

.95 

.92} 

.92 

.90 


Detroit. 


No.  2,  red. 


St.  Louis. 


Minneap- 
olis. 


Low.  High 


$0. 78 
.  78* 
.  78.7 
.74" 
.741 
.c.7:; 

.661 
.68} 
.70* 
.70 
.73 
.79 


.86 
.84} 
.77} 
.77* 
.80" 
.79 
.72 
.68* 
.703 
.72 
75} 
.771 


.773 
.79 
.74} 
.75} 
.76 
.773 
.76* 
.78* 
.79 
.823 
.84 
.89 


.92 
.94} 

.97; 

.98 
1.021 
1.01 
.97 
.98 
1.111 
1.16 
1.16 
1 .  15 


1.19 

1.17* 

1.07* 

.96 

.97 

1 .  00 

.8(1 

.81 

.82 

.80 

.87J 

.86 


SO.  82} 

.80} 

.80 

.78 

.77} 

.77} 

.71 

.7(1', 

.73} 

.71" 

.79} 

.'JO1 


.93* 
.S7} 
.853 
.87} 
.88 
.81* 
.82 
.73 
.74 
.763 
.80: 
.83 


.  S3' 

.81 

.79 

.773 

.  79* 

.82 

.80 

.84 

.84 

.87} 

.9(1 

.'.'1 


.95 
1.12 

1. 01', 

1.0J 

1.12* 
1.13 

1.07 
1.16 
1.23 

1.21 
1.22 
1.20 


1.23 
1.24 
1.21 
1.07} 
1.08 
1.09 
1.05 
.84 
.853 
.90} 
.90} 


No.  2,  red 
winter. 


No. 1,  north- 
ern. 


Low.  High, 


.72   $0.77 
.73}      .753 


.74 

.71 

.73'. 

.633 

.61} 

.661 
■  70J 
.70* 
.72J 

.81 


.86* 

.83} 

.761 

.77} 

.76* 

.76" 

.  65* 

.63" 

.66 

.673 

.69 

.69 


.73} 
.73* 
.70" 
.691 
.72 
.76 
.77} 
.791 
.84 
.85 
.  85* 
.90" 


.89* 

.94" 

.98 

.97 

.98 

1.00 

.91 

.91 

1.08} 

1.13} 

1.12* 

1.13 


1.14 
1.16} 
1.111 
.98 
.95 
.92 
.83* 
.82} 
.82 
.88 
.89 
.923 


.753 
.76} 
.76 
.7.5} 
.  703 
.73" 
.72* 
.73} 
.80 
.88} 


.92* 

.89* 

.863 

.83} 

.84} 

.80 

.78 

.68} 

.  68* 

.72 

.71 

.74} 


«0.73 
.73 
.73 
.70} 
•  701 
.621 
.60} 
.(1(1 
.661 
.do 

.68} 

.713 


.732 
.72} 
.70* 
.702 
.74 
•  73J 
.762 
.74} 
.66* 
.68' 
.1X1 


.76} 
.77* 
.75} 
.731 
.76} 
.83} 
.82 
.85 


.90* 
.94 


.97 
1.12 
1.08. 
1.08 
1.10 

1.103 

1.12 

1.14} 

1.21 

1.21 
1.18 
1. 18* 


1.20 

1.19* 

1.17 

1.12 

1.13* 

1.06 

.9.5* 

.88 

.90 

.95 

.95 

1.01 


Low.  High 


San  Fran- 
cisco. 


No.  1,  Cali- 
fornia 
(per  cwt.). 


Low.  High 


$0.77} 
.712 
.742 
.74} 
.74} 
.743 
.693 
.71* 
.69J 
■68J 
.7l| 
.77 


.79* 

•  75j 

•  75J 
.772 
.78 
.77 
.80 
.79: 
•71} 
.731 
.74* 
.74| 


•  73J 
.75| 

.74| 

.741 

.76 

.79} 

.83} 

.832 

.82 

.78} 

.772 

.  80* 


.843 

.90 

.94* 

.90| 

.93} 

.93* 

.942 

1.03* 

1.12 

1.112 

1.062 

1.061 


1.08* 

1.073 

1.05 

.912 

.952 

1.04 

1.01} 

.83* 

.75} 

•  782 

.79 

.773 


.78 
.77- 
.77; 

•  80J 

•  88J 
.89} 

1.00 
.913 
.86 
.82J 

•  83J 


$0,971 
.95 
.95 

1.00 
.97* 
.96} 
.95 
.97} 
.96} 
.  95 
.982 

1.01} 


1.05 

1.07* 

1.10" 

1.10 

1.11} 

1.11} 

1.133 

1.12} 

1.12* 

1.181 

1.32} 

1.371 


1.30} 
1.433 
1.35 
1.35 
1 .  32* 
1.32* 
1.32* 
1.45 
1.37* 
1.30} 
1.38? 
1.333 


$1.01} 
.98J 
1.02} 
1.05 
1.01} 
1.00 
1.00 
.98| 
.97} 
.  98J 
1.01J 
1.06} 


.91.1 

1.05 

1.01* 

.983 

.982 

.97} 

1.02 

1.242 

1.24* 

1.22" 

1.192 

1.14} 


1.13* 

1.123 

1.111 

1.08| 

1.24 

1.09', 

1.091 

1.11 

.80 

•871 

.84* 

.81" 


1.35 

1.35 

1.36} 

1.27* 

1.26J 

1.233 

1.233 

1.37 

1.40 

1  45 

1.45 

1.45 


1.45 
1.50 
1.50 
1.45 
1.45 
1.50 
1.50 
1.45 
1.40 
1.40 
1.40 
1.35 


STATISTICS    OF    OATS. 


561 


Wholesale  prices  of  wheat  per -bushel  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1901-1906- 

Continued. 


New  York. 

Baltimore. 

Chicago.        Detroit. 

St.  Louis. 

Minneap- 
olis. 

San  Fran- 
cisco. 

Date. 

No.  2,  red 
winter. 

Southern, 
No.  2,  red. 

No.l,  north-'  N              j 
em  spring.  | 

No.  2,  red 
winter. 

No.l,  north- 
ern. 

No.  1,  Cali- 
fornia 
(per  cwt.). 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High.1  Low.  High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low.  High. 

Low.  High. 

1906. 
January 

.89* 
,90| 
.85 

.88J 

.93 

•  91| 

.81 

.77J 

.77 

.97 

.96J 

.891 

.92) 

.95 

.97 

•  92| 

.814 

.81" 

.84 

.84*. 

.81 

.83 

.86? 

.871 

.75? 

.71 

.68 

.74 

.73*. 

.73f 

.86? 

.86? 

.84? 

.88? 

.89-3 

.91 

.81? 

.75 

•74J 

■  75| 

.75*. 

.75 

.81J 

.79} 

.74.1 

.77" 

.801 

.81? 

.75? 

.735 

.77 

a. 71 

o.71| 

a.  721 

.85}      -85 
.83Ji     .84 
.79*1     .81 
.83*1     .85* 
.87}!     .89} 
.  85f      .  86 
.84  ■     .74? 

.88 

.86*. 

.86 

.89 

.93* 

.89" 

.85* 

.92*. 

.88 

.89 

.90 

.88 

.80 

■  71" 

.68J 

.69 

.74 

.74 

.74 

.96 

.94 

.98 
.98* 

.82 

.72j 

.75* 

.77} 

.76} 

.76} 

February 
March 

April 

May 

July 



.77|      .721     -75 

.79       .72  ;     .75} 

0.735      -74f     .78} 

a.  74}     .77*1       784. 

a. 75  !     .76|     .781 

September 

October 

./8*      .83| 
.SOJI     .84  J 
.801      .83 

November 

December . 



o  No.  2.  red. 


OATS. 

Oat  crop  of  countries  named,  1902-1906. 
[Substantially  the  crop  of  the  world.] 


Country. 


1903. 


1905. 


NORTH   AMERICA. 

Jj$  lishfls 
United  States 9X7. 843. 000 


Canada: 

New  Brunswick. 

Ontario 

Manitoba 

Saskatchewan. . 

Alberta 

Other 


Bushels. 
784.094.000 


Bushels. 
894,  590, 000 


Bushels. 
953,210,000 


5,481,000 

109,780.000 

35, 565. 000 

7,196.000 

3.S96.000 

43.000.000 


5,974,000 
113,337,000 

34,077,000 
9.453.000 
5.351.000 

43.000.000 


Total  Canada 204, 924, 000 

I   . 
Mexico 

Total  North  America 1, 192. 7S0, 000 


211,192,000 


EUROPE. 

Austria -Hungary: 

Austria 

Hungary  proper 

Croatia-Slavonia 

Bosnia-Herzegovina 

Total  Austria  -Hungary. . 

Belgium 

Bulgaria 

Denmark 

Finland 

France 

Germany 

Italy 

Netherlands 

Norway 

Rouma'nia 

Russia: 

Russia  proper 

Poland 

Northern  Caucn  sia 

Total  Russia  (European) . 


13,000 


995,299.000 


125.473,000 

82;  807, 000 

6,301,000 

3.001.000 


128.330,000 

87,334,000 

7, 330, 000 

5,612,000 


217,582,000 


228,606,000 


5. 316. 000 
105,393,000 
37,434,000 
11,095.000 

5,786,000 
43,000,000 


5.659,000 
108,890,000 
46,917,000 
19,819,000 

9,814,000 
43,000,000 


208.024.000 


234,099,000 


IS,  000 


17.000 


1,102,638,000 


1.187,332.000 


109,611,000  123,880,000 

62,775,000  78,009,000 

4,907,000  6,075,000 

3,829.000  2,935.000 


181,122,000       210.899.000 


45,588,000 

10,000.000 

40,822,000 

15,190,000 

276.948,000 

514,452,000 

13,000,000 

19,241.000 

6,674.000 

21,905.000 


48,345,000 

11.3S9.000 

41,176,000 

17,046,000 

300,366,000 

542,432,000 

16,000.000 

20,112,000 

9,091,000 

33,108,000 


37,499,000 

11.179.000 

38. 183, 000 

16,995.000 

257,811,000 

477,852.000 

14,000.000 

18,  592. 000 

6,922,000 

12, 608, 000 


807,888,000 
63,167,000 
16,112,000 


650,405,000  1,006,102,000 
58,745,000  44,393,000 
18,933.000         14,593,000 


728,089.000  11,065.088,000 


33,786.000 

10,263.000 

32.659,000 

15,000,000 

269,581,000 

451,017,000 

16,000,000 

16,045,000 

9,868,000 

18,974.000 


767,550,000 
61,933,000 
22,228,000 


Bushels. 
964, 905. 000 


5, 875, 000 
111,756.000 
52,291.000 
24,721,000 
14.209.000 
43,000,000 


251.852,000 


17,000 


1, 216, 774, 000 


154,551.000 
87, 733, 000 
6,200,000 
3,836,000 


252,320,000 


40,000,000 

18,793.000 

38.000,000 

16.000,000 

258,454,000 

580, 875. 000 

18,000.000 

18.000,000 

81000,000 

26, 165. 000 


851,711,000 


544,873,000 
66,424,000 
21,968,000 


633. 265, 000 


3    A1906- 


-36 


562  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Oat  crop  of  countries  monad,  190^-1906 — Continued. 


Country. 

1902. 

. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

eueope — continued. 

Bushels. 

4.044,000 
23.349.000 
57.323.000 

Bushels. 
4,398.000 
22.942.000 
59.641.000 

Bushels. 
3,167.000 
18,500.000 
51,578.000 

Bushels. 
3,50,000 

22.305.000 
58.488.000 

Bushels. 
42  000 

Spain 

32  000 

■ 

United  Kingdom : 
Great  Britain- 

89,809.000 

36.760.000 

7.924.000 

65, 570. 000 

85.  400.000 

36,379,000 

6,832,000 

58,816,000 

"28,000 

37.034.000 

7.661.000 

60.142.000 

76.453.000 

36.390.000 

7.264.000 

60,754.000 

^4  102  000 

35  107  000 

Wales  

8  063  000 

Ireland 

60  000  000 

Total  United  Kingdom . . . 

200.063.000 

187.427.000 

191,565.000 

180.861.000 

187.272.000 

Total  Europe 

2. 353. 34*.  000 

2.270.168.000 

2,402.661.000 

2.201.006.000 

2.214.049.000 

ASIA. 

Cyprus 

236.000 

481.000 

417.000 

400.000  | 

400.000 

Russia . 

Central  Asia 

9.433.000 
34.07S.000 

11.342.000 
60.352.000 

8.014,000 
51.101,000 

14.279.000  . 
70.672,000 

9.806.000 

69.872.000 

Total  Russia  (Asiatic) 

43.511.000 

71.694.000 

59.115.000 

M  .-51.000  '. 

"     •  "8.000 

Total  Asia . 


43.747.000  ! 


85.351.000 


80.078.000 


AFRICA. 

Algeria 

Cape  of  Good  Hope 

8.732,000 

1.750,000 

9,000 

324. 000 

7.976.000 

2.503.000 

6.000 

1.631,000 

6,631,000 

2.000.000 

43.000 

4,635,000 

6.000.000 
2.000.000 

8.000,000 
2. 000.  (Win 

Natal 

Tunis 

9.000  i                 9.000 
2.032.000  j          2.411.000 

Total  Africa 

10.815.000 

12.116.000 

13.309.000 

10.041.000           12.420.000 

AUSTRALASIA. 

Australia : 

Queensland 

44.000 
709,000 

6.937.000 
4S4.000 
164.000 

1.756.000 

1,000 
363.000 

4.542,000 
640,000 
173,000 

1.808,000 

73.000 

1.292.000 

13.858.000 

931,000 

267.000 

1.673.000 

16.000 

673. 000 

6,353.000 

573.000 

233.000 

6. 000 
911,000 

7.460.000 

897.000 

293.000 

1.216.000  |          1.238.000 

Total    Australian    Corn- 

10.094.000 

7.527.000 

18.094.000 

9.064.000 

10.805.000 

15.519.000 

22.452.000 

15.5S3.000  J      15.012.000 

13.108.000 

25,613.000 

29,979,000 

33.677.000         24.076.000 

23.913.000 

Grand  total 

3.626.303.000   3.379.737.000 

'         1 

3.611.817.000   3.507.806.000 

3.547.234.000 

Visible  supply  of  oats  in  the  United  States  and  Canada,  first  of  each  month,  for  ten  years." 


Bushels. 

July 12,912.000 

August 9. 604. 000 

September 13, 784. 000 

October 15, 573, 000 

Noyember 20,096.000 

December IS 

January 16. 148. 000 

February 20. 245. 000 

March. 17, 925. 000 

April 15. 609. 000 

May 14.  402. 000 

.Tune 10.  421, 000 


1898-99.  1899-1900.  1900-1901.  1901-2. 


Bushels. 
S.  716. 000 
4. 971. 000 
7,360.000 
9.286,000 
11,352,000 
9.460.000 
10.893.000 
13.231.000 
14.782,000 
15. 725, 000 
13,971.000 
13.661.000 


Bus\i. 
10.262.000  I 

■•  no 

10,973,000 

13. 12; . 000 
13. 254. 000 
11.789.000 
12, 004, 000 
11,876.000 
12,  449. 000 
14, 176. 000 
13, 845. 000 
12,301,000 


Bushels. 

12.716.000 

13.853.000 
17.140.000 

20.528,000 

• 

16,175.000 
16,800.000 
15.  823. 000 

16.824.000 
14.989.000 


Bush: 

15.275.000 

"   ••  ■ 

10.603.000 

14.445.000 

12.899.000 

10.109.000 

vXOOO 

8.537.000 

_  7.000 

6. 606. 000 

5. 010. 000 

4,571,000 


«  These  figures  represent  stocks  ayailalsle  at  62  of  the  principal  points  of  accumulation  east  of  the 
Rocky  Mountains,  stocks  in  Manitoba  eleyators,  and  stocks  afloat  on  lakes  and  canals,  as  reported  by 
Bradstreet's. 


STATISTICS    OF    OATS. 


563 


Visible  supply  of  oats  in  the  United  States  and  Canada,  first  of  each  month,  for  ten  years- 
Continued. 


July 

August... 
September 
October... 
November 
December. 
January.. 
February . 

March 

April 

May 

June 


1902-3. 


Bushels. 

2,  420, 000 

2, 988, 000 

5, 159, 000 

11,241,000 

10,661,000 

10,401,000 

8, 794, 000 

8,727,000 

12,437,000 

12,  432, 000 

9,992,000 

7,160,000 


Bushels. 
6, 686, 000 
8,623,000 
11,714,000 
10, 876, 000 
13, 332, 000 
13, 995, 000 
13, 785, 000 
14, 774, 000 
15,241,000 
15, 377,.  000 
12, 955, 000 
8,296,000 


1905-1). 


Bushels. 
6,766,000 
4,044,000 
19, 607, 000 
31,553,000 
33,693,000 
34, 103, 000 
31, 343, 000 
26,095,000 
22, 570, 000 
22, 667, 000 
19, 395, 000 
11,325,000 


Bushels. 
11,174,000 
8,007,000 
20,597,000 
28,018,000 
37, 526, 000 
40, 206, 000 
39,301,000 
35,791,000 
31,726,000 
28,006,000 
22,033,000 
12,785,000 


Bushels. 
10,020,000 
7,607,000 
13,241,000 
15,969,000 
17, 275, 000 
20,011,000 
19,766,000 
18, 034, 000 
15,  664, 000 
14,435,000 
14,815,000 


Condition  oj 

the  oat  crop  of  the 

United  States,  monthly, 

1889- 

1906. 

u 
ffi 

u 

£> 

.Q 

& 

Year. 

6 
a 

3 

>> 

3 

en 

3 
60 

3 

i 

CD 

Year. 

i 

"3 

OQ 

3 
60 

3 

a 
& 

a 

Year. 

6 

a 

3 

>> 

3 

3 

Eh 

3 

a 

ft 

5 

Hs 

>-> 

■«! 

CO 

^ 

^ 

< 

m 

* 

Hs 

■< 

02 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct.  P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

1889.... 

93.8 

94.1 

92.3 

90.0 

1895.... 

84.3 

83.2 

84.5 

86.0 

1901.... 

85.3 

83.7 

73.6 

72.1 

1890.... 

89.8 

81.6 

70.1 

64.4 

1896.... 

98.8 

96.3 

77.3 

74.0 

1902.... 

90.6 

92.1 

89.4 

87.2 

1891.... 

85.1 

87.6 

89.5 

90.7 

1897.... 

89.0 

87.5 

86.0 

84.6 

1903.... 

85.5 

84.3 

79.5 

75.7 

1892.... 

88.5 

87.2 

86.2 

78.9 

1898.... 

98.0 

92.8 

84.2 

79.0 

1904.... 

89.2 

89.8 

86.6 

85.6 

1893.... 

88.9 

88.8 

78.3 

74.9 

1899.... 

88.7 

90.0 

90.8 

87.2 

1905.... 

92.9 

92.1 

90.8 

90.3 

1894.... 

87.0 

77.7 

76.5 

77.8 

1900.... 

91.7 

85.5 

85.0 

82.9 

1906.... 

85.9 

84.0 

82.8 

81.9 

Acreage,  production,  va 

lue,  prices 

exports,  etc.,  o 

/  oats 

of  the  United  States,  1866-1906. 

Av- 

Chicago cash  price  per 

Domestic 

Acreage. 

Av- 
erage 
yield 

per 
acre. 

Produc- 
tion. 

erage 
farm 
price 
per 
bush- 
el, 

Farm 
value, 
Dec.  1. 

bushel 

,  No.  2 

exports, 
including 
oatmeal, 

fiscal 
year  be- 
ginning 
July  l.o 

Imports 
during 

Year. 

December. 

May  of 

following 

year. 

fiscal 
year 
begin- 
ning 

Dec.l. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

July  l.o 

Acres. 

Bush. 

Bushels. 

Cts. 

Dollars. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

as. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

1866 

8,864,219 

30.2 

268,141,077 

35.1 

94,057,945 

36 

43 

59 

78 

825,895 

778, 198 

1867 

10,746,416 

25.9 

278,698,000 

44.5 

123,902,556 

52 

57* 

122, 554 

780,798 

1868 

9,665,736 

26.4 

254,960,S00 

41.7 

106,355,976 

43 

494 

56! 

62* 

481,871 

326,659 

1869 

9,461,441 

30.5 

288,334,000 

38.0 

109,521,734 

40 

4*1 

46*. 

53* 

121,517 

2,266,785 

1870 

8,792,395 

28.1 

247,277,400 

39.0 

96,443,637 

37! 

41 

47| 

51 

147,572 

599,514 

1871 

8,365,809 

30.6 

255,743,0001     36.2 

92,591,359 

30| 

33 

34! 

42* 

262,975 

535,250 

1872 

9,000,769 

30.2 

271,747,000 

29.9 

81,303,518 

23* 

25J 

30 

34 

714,072 

225,555 

1873 

9,751,700 

27.7 

270,340,000 

34.6     93,474,161 

34 

40* 

44 

48* 

812,873 

191,802 

1874 

10,897,412 

22.1 

240,369,000 

47.  li  113,133,934 

51| 

54* 

571 

64* 

504,770 

1,500,040 

1875 

11,915,075 

29.7 

354,317,500 

32.0    113,441,491 

29* 

30*. 

28? 

31* 

1,466,228 

121,547 

1876 

13,358,908 

24.0 

320,884,000 

32.4!  103,844,896 

31f 

34* 

37* 

45! 

2,854,128 

41,597 

1877 

12,826,148 

31.7 

406,394,000 

28.41  115,546,194 

m 

27 

23 

27 

3,715,479 

21,391 

1878 

13,176,500 

31.4 

413,578,560 

24.6;  101,752,468 

198 

20* 

24? 

30* 

5,452,136 

13,395 

1879 

12,683,500 

28.7 

363,761,320 

33.1 

120,533,294 

32| 

36! 

294 

34* 

766,366 

489,576 

1880 

16,187,977 

25.8 

417,885,380 

36.0 

150,243,565 

29* 

33* 

36J 

39* 

402,904 

64, 412 

1881 

16,831,600 

24.7 

416,481,000 

46.4 

193,198,970 

43* 

46! 

48! 

56* 

625,690 

1,850,983 

1882 

18,494,691 

26.4 

488,250.610 

37.5 

182,978,022 

34f 

41* 

38! 

42! 

461,496 

815,017 

1883 

20,324,962 

28.1 

571,302,400 

32.7 

187,040,264 

29| 

36* 

30! 

34* 

3,274,622 

121,069 

1884 

21,300,917 

27.4 

583,628,000 

27.7 

161,528,470 

22* 

25} 

34* 

37 

6,203,104 

94,310 

1885 

22,783,630 

27.6 

629,409,000 

28.5 

179,631,860 

27 

29 

26* 

29* 

7,311,306 

149,480 

1886 

23,658,474 

26.4 

624,134,000 

29.8 

186,137,930 

25| 

27J 

25* 

27* 

1,374,635 

139, 575 

1887 

25,920,906 

25.4 

659,618,000 

30.4 

200,699,790 

28$ 

30* 

32* 

38 

573,080 

123,817 

1888 

26,998,282 

26.0 

701,735,000 

27.8 

195,424,240 

25 

26* 

21* 

23* 

1,191,471 

131,501 

1889 

27,462,316 

27.4 

751,515,000 

22.9 

171,781,008 

20 

21 

24! 

30 

15,107,238 

153,232 

1890 

26,431,369 

19.8 

523,621,000 

42.4 

222,048,486 

39| 

43* 

45* 

54 

1,382,836 

41,848 

1891 

25,581,861 

28.9 

738,394,000 

31.5 

232,312,267 

31* 

33* 

28* 

33* 

10,586,644 

47,782 

1892 

27,003,835 

24.4 

661,035,000 

31.7 

209,253,611 

25* 

3l| 

28! 

32J 

2,700,793 

49,433 

1893 

27,273,033 

23.4 

638,854,850 

29.4 

187,576,092 

27* 

29* 

32* 

36 

6,290,229 

31,759 

1894 

27,023,553 

24.5 

662,036,928 

32.4 

214,816,920 

28! 

29* 

27J 

30! 

1,708,824 

330,318 

1895 

27,878,406 

29.6 

824,443,537 

19.9 

163,655,068 

16§ 

"4 

18 

19* 

15,156,618 

66,602 

a  In  years  1866  to  1882,  inclusive,  oatmeal  is  not  included. 


564 


YEABBOOK    <"»F    THE    PEPABTMEXT    OF    AGBICTLTUBE. 


Afrragr.  production,  value,  prices,  expotti  ftke  United  States,  1866-1906 — 

I  i 


Acreage- 


Acres. 

Bu-th . 

Btuhele. 

Or. 

Dollar  *. 

a*. 

CU. 

Ctt. 

Bushels. 

Bu-htlt. 

.- 

.-   '   '     ■' 

a  " 

i 

18.7 

132,485,033 

18f 

18? 

S'.725.0« 

131.204 

■  1 

; 

27.2 

»,  767,80! 

21.2 

147.974.719 

-- 

23* 

. 

- 

73.880,307 

- 

II 

.'   775   U 

28.4 

" 

25.5 

186,4' 

26 

27$ 

- 

27! 

33.-534.362 

a 

26.341.380 

30.2 

79    177  713 

24 

198,167,975 

.- 

23 

21} 

23f 

45.048,857 

- 

29.6 

2s     ■ 

25.8 

9,233 

21* 

V>1 

- 

31 

4-  268,931 

.  -  : 

1 

i 

-•  ••  •  ".-. 

39.9 

293,658,777 

42 

4- 

41 

49j 

13,277,612 

■     71 

HOJ 

28,653,144 

34.5 

"  ■  .  v: 

30.7 

303,584,852 

32 

33f 

8,381,805 

; 

28.4 

; 

34.1 

267,661,665 

344 

3S 

44} 

1,960,740 

~ 

32. 1 

894,595,552 

31.3 

279.900.013 

.- 

32 

m 

32 

8,394,692 

: 

. 

340 

53,2 

29.1 

277     -57,537 

- 

32? 

- 

48,434,541 

40.025 

■■  _ 

31.2 

964.904,522 

31.7 

306,2'-. 

33 

34 

H.  production,  value,  and  distribution  of  oats  in  the  United  States  in  1906.  by  8i 


Crop 


Stat  nitory. 


Acreage.        Production.         Value. 


Stock  in  farmer.- hands  %^2?* 

March  1.  1907.  .^f?™^ 

where  grown. 




nipshire . 

Uaad... 

Connecticut 

rk 

' 

Pennsylvania . . . 



West  V  - . 

b  roliiL'i . . 
- 

G       :.      

.  .    -        



:     




n 

Iowa 

I 

H    - 
South  : 

Ska 



Kentix  ■ 

see 

is 

L- 

:  


Indu 



-'.-■ 



Wye  t  iiqg 



A  rj     m    



'.'6. 



.  .      .. 


California 


112.817 
12,29 

-    ej 

1.604 
9,976 

1.245.62* 

62,512 

1,161, 186 

■ 
31.834  i 

102.000 
-  '  . 
191,259 

216.922 

1,475.000 
1.780.000 

2,215.728 
4,165,000 

1.245.711 
1,275,000 

:    -V    a 

206.063  I 
146. 573 
i 

90.374 

_  . 
914.440 
21 : .  730 
350.000 
184,571 
196.802 

50.103 

:.  . 

i  ■ 

172  767 

284,660 

- 


Bushels. 
■ 
424.212 
2,862,72 

214.472 
! 
341.179 
40.2 

.'.819 

31.816.496 

95. 991 

2.85- 
2.101.200 
3,169  724 

3.5.-   .   - 
3.3'- 
394.240 
48,380.000 
50,19 
107, 7 

43. 747.  SCO 

■  .000 

72.011.160 

140.777.000 

-  503 

40,485 

'000 
73  --■.000 
.       -  .000 

3.151.320 
3,167     ' 

.     !  . 

-.' 

31.822.512 

7.44'    571 

12.040.000 

"■     " 

8,3  I 

1.979.068 

5,962,394 

424.507 

2,0S     •• 

252    ■    ■ 

.534 

•  1*1. 508  ■ 

5.1' 


DoUort. 
1,777,094 

! 
1.230.972 

94.308 

21.149 

143. 295 

16.093.514 

i 
12.090.26S 
177 

1.229.213 
840,480 

1.553.165 

2.01-    -. 

-    -■ 

15,965 

16.  062  72 
33,4  '■• 
14. 4' •       " 
28.4' r 
19.443.013 
38,009.790 

21 
10.931.114 
11.6rr2.5O0 
18,791,500 

S      -:800  : 

1,6K    ' 

1,292 

1.6:" 

i  i 

218.802  , 

"230 

.     -J.903 

3.371.200 

I    -■■     157 

m  n2 

791.627 

220.744 

20.437 

924.255 

4.137.248 

■     ." 


Bushels. 

1.494.374 

US.  779 

1.173,718 

77. 210 

14.569 

!   I 

19.714.554 

"   ■   U 

13.99i.25S 

.   I    " 

283.004 

914. 763 

819,468 

665.642 

' 

504,344 

--■ 

■ 

37.717.22-5 

i; 

- 
i 

60,534,110 

■    : 
.       "     72 
22   i 

.    '.     73 

1.329.106 

'    ■    ' 
292    •". 

'   - 

4,334.400 

945.926 

3.230.701 

514.558 

■■ 

106.127 

■   ."' 

718,88 

63, 224 

11       - 

2,089,79 

2,982,667 

773.445 


United  States. 


-  .522       306,292.978       384 


Per  cent. 
37 
28 
41 
36 
31 
28 
49 

44 
34 
35 
32 
39 
21 
16 
15 
10 
38 
30 
35 
40 
43 
43 
43 


53 
49 
45 
39 
30 
28 
17 
18 
15 
20 
30 
•i6 
25 
38 
26 
40 
25 
. 

35 
2.5 
40 
28 
I 
15 


Bushelt. 

0 

0 

2.145 
0 

.';.4i2 

-    •  10, 365 

1,39     ■_' 
10.559 
72   " 
114.345 

- 
-2.600 

20: 07 

49.571.210 
10.499.400 
14.660.800 
25.20?.  906 
45. 04*.  640 

1.4- 

7.692.266 
13. f/. 
- 
i   ' 

:      . 

31.079 

.    ' 

0 

'     "     .- 

1,41 

3.4 

-■     -• 

•"  t.406 
72 

1.490.598 

■ 

_    ' 

25,29 
1.5- 
2    B5  414 

:  To.  098 
1,4 


- 


STATISTICS    OF    OATS.  565 

Average  yield  of  oats  in  certain  countries,  in  bushels  per  acre,  1896-1905. 


Yen  r. 

United 
States. 

Russia. 

Ger- 
many. 

Austria. 

Hungary. 

France. 

United 
Kingdom. 

1896 

25.7 
27.2 
28.4 
30.2 
29.6 
25.8 
34.5 
28.4 
32.1 
34.0 

C) 

19.2 
15.7 
16.5 
23.6 
19.5 
14.0 
21.8 
17.7 
25.7 
20.7 

41.8 
39.9 
47.1 
48.0 
48.0 
44.5 
50.2 
51.3 
46.3 
43.8 

(6) 
23.1 
21.5 
27.3 
30.2 
25.3 
25.6 
27.6 
28.4 
24.3 
27.6 

(6) 
S1.4 

24.3 
30.2 
33.3 
28.1 
28.1 
34.0 
34.5 
25.6 
30.7 

(a) 
27.0 
23.1 
29.0 
27.8 
25.7 
23.5 
29.2 
31.6 
27.2 
28.6 

(a) 
39.2 

1897 

40.1 

1898 

43.6 

1899...                        

41.8 

1900 

41.2 

1901 

40.  G 

1902 ...                    

45.9 

1903...                        

44.2 

1904 .                            

42.1 

1905...             

41.7 

Average 

29.6 

19.4 

46.1 

26.1 

30.0 

27.3 

42.0 

a  Winchester  bushels.  t>  Bushels  of  32  pounds. 

Average  yield  per  acre  of  oats  in  the  United  States,  1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 

1897. 

1898. 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

190G. 

Bush. 
31.0 
35.0 
33.0 
32.0 
32.0 
29.0 
31.0 
25.0 
28.2 
22.0 
24.0 
12.0 
20.0 
13.0 
15.5 
14.0 
9.0 
32.0 
30.2 
32.0 
26.0 
34.0 
26.0 
30.0 
22.0 
23.0 
22.0 
31.0 
24.0 
18.0 
10.0 
13.0 
14.0 
18.0 
25.0 

Bush. 
36.0 
33.0 
38.0 
32.0 
27.0 
28.2 
27.5 
19.6 
23.3 
22.0 
19.5 
16.1 
19.5 
14.3 
17.2 
16.6 
15.4 
30.9 
29.2 
29.0 
32.8 
36.1 
36.3 
34.0 
17.0 
30.7 
26.8 
32.1 
18.0 
22.4 
18.7 
16.8 
18.5 
18.1 
29.7 

Bush. 
35.0 
35.0 
37.0 
33.0 
26.0 
28.0 
31.0 
24.0 
33.0 
20.0 
23.0 
14.0 
23.0 
12.0 
12.0 
9.0 
9.0 
36.0 
32.0 
38.0 
34.0 
36.0 
32.0 
33.0 
25.0 
30.0 
26.0 
30.0 
29.0 
18.0 
14.0 
10.0 
10.0 
18.0 
25.0 

Bush. 
37.5 
32.6 
34.9 
36.8 
30.9 
31.0 
27.9 
29.6 
31.1 
21.0 
24.0 
14.8 
21.0 
13.9 
15.5 
15.0 
11.3 
38.0 
32.7 
38.0 
36.7 
32.0 
25.2 
34.0 
27.4 
10.3 
21.5 
21.8 
31.6 
21.3 
16.6 
14.4 
14.0 
18.0 
38.0 

Bush. 
35.0 
29.5 
33.0 
31.0 
29.4 
28.7 
21.6 
16.0 
18.9 
18.5 
18.8 
14.9 
18.7 
14.4 
15.8 
14.8 
13.1 
31.5 
28.6 
28.2 
29.0 
29.1 
32.1 
29.8 
11.2 
32.6 
28.8 
19.8 
18.6 
19.7 
17.5 
14.5 
15.2 
13.4 
16.3 
25.0 
20.7 
12.3 
42.0 
41.0 
33.8 
31.6 
35.0 
33.0 
43.0 
38.3 
47.5 
31.5 
30.4 

Bush. 
39.0 
35.0 
40.0 
32.2 
36.2 
34.5 
40.0 
32.2 
36.5 
22.6 
26.7 
17.5 
28.6 
12.7 
13.1 
11.1 
13.6 
41.1 
35.4 
37.7 
39.9 
39.9 
39.0 
30.7 
32.5 
38.4 
34.8 
34.6 
33.5 
22.2 
17.3 
10.9 
15.4 
15.2 
23.2 
32.6 
47.8 
20.0 
41.9 
36.0 
26.8 
19.1 
31.7 
35.5 
34.8 
42.1 
46.2 
28.7 
30.5 

Bush. 
39.5 
31.1 
38.2 
31.7 
28.1 
31.2 
34.0 
25.4 
28.6 
22.2 
20.6 
13.8 
21.7 
11.4 
14.0 
13.6 
13.2 
30.6 
24.4 
26. 6 
30.5 
32.8 
32.3 
24.0 
22.1 
27^4 
38.6 
29.5 
26.2 
20.1 
18.5 
15.8 
15.0 
15.9 
35.5 
30.0 
26.4 
18.6 
46.4 
29.4 
33.3 
22.6 
35.5 
36.4 
28.6 
41.5 
47.9 
33.8 
34.8 

Bush. 
36.6 
33.2 
37.9 
34.0 
25.4 
33.5 
34.1 
32.5 
33.9 
28.2 
29.7 
21.1 
26.4 
15.8 
17.1 
14.8 
12.9 
40.9 
33.1 
32.0 
32.5 
35.0 
39.2 
32.0 
22.7 
37.4 
39.0 
30.7 
17.8 
24.0 
21.1 
14.9 
19.2 
18.4 
32.0 
32.2 
21.2 
22.7 
37.7 
30.2 
35.4 
19.6 
30.1 
37.6 
37.0 
39.3 
44.9 
23.1 
34.1 

Bush. 
39.5 
32.8 
39.4 
32.0 
29.4 
34.5 
34.2 
32.0 
34.0 
31.2 
27.7 
17.8 
24.1 
15.3 
16.3 
15.1 
12.0 
35.8 
35.3 
35.5 
35.6 
39.0 
37.5 
35.0 
27.2 
38.9 
39.0 
31.0 
27.1 
25.5 
20.2 
16.5 
18.5 
16.0 
31.4 
36.0 
33.0 
20.3 
41.3 
39.9 
35.0 
29.5 
31.2 
39.8 
37.2 
39.4 
50.0 
24.1 
28.0 

Bush. 
35.8 

34.5 

37.2 

34.0 

29.3 

34.2 

32.3 

26.6 

27.4 

24.5 

25.4 

18.0 

20.6 

16.2 

18.5 

15.5 

14.0 

Ohio  

32.8 

28.2 

29.5 

30.7 

37.4 

32.5 

33.8 

22.8 

32.5 

36.4 

29.5 

23.6 

21.5 

21.5 

17.2 

18.0 

17.2 

34.8 

34.2 

34.4 

17.0 
42.0 
35.0 
34.0 
35.5 

22.8 
40.6 
31.2 
35.8 
38.8 

19.0 
38.0 
30.0 
27.0 
24.0 

22.2 
39.0 
34.2 
32.8 
30.1 

20.5 

43.2 

39.5 

40.4 

34.6 

34.4 

Utah 

35.0 

39.7 

34.0 

35.9 

43.7 

38.  S 

36.3 
48.0 
32.0 
18.0 

43.6 
41.9 
27.0 
33.0 

34.0 
37.0 
30.0 
31.0 

36.6 
34.4 
18.5 
24.6 

40.7 

43.2 

33.8 

California 

31.5 

General  average 

27.2 

28.4 

30.2 

29.6 

25.8 

34.5 

28.4 

32.1 

34.0 

31.2 

YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Avero  per  acre  of  oats  i  ."     ted  States,  based  upon  farm  value  December  1, 

1897-1906.  by  States. 


1   rritacy. 

1897. 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

Manv 

$9.92 

1130 

10  56 
10  56 

9.  86 
■     ' 
7. -50 
7.61 
5.06 
a  24 
4« 
6.00 

• 
5.88 
477 
6.40 
5.74 
i  ! 
'    H 
6.46 
4  94 
480 
4  IS 
'     - 
3.96 

5.32 

486 
280 
5.59 
6  16 
M 
6  75 

$12.24 
12.54 
1130 
1L84 
9.99 
10  15 

as3 

6.08 
6.99 
6.60 
5.  65 
1     " 
5.  85 
5.29 
7.74 

-  n 

a32 

7.42 

a 

• 
a  so 
ao6 

7.62 

191 

-  ■ 
5.63 
642 
196 
605 
5.24 
6.89 
7.77 
6.88 
a32 

$1130 

1165 

1169 

12.54 

9.62 

1136 

10.23 

7.92 

9.57 

100 

6.90 

462 

105 

492 

164 

432 

450 

9.00 

7.36 

836 

9.52 

;  -- 

7.04 

627 

600 

a  io 

198 
6.60 
6.38 

176 

430 
100 
7.20 
7.50 

$14  25 
12.39 
12.56 
1198 
11.74 
10  85 
193 
9.18 
9.33 
6.30 
7.44 
148 
7.14 
6.26 
7.44 
7.15 
1  65 
9.88 
7.52 
■   M 
9.54 
7.36 
6.05 
6.80 
6.30 
130 
116 
123 

160 

5.81 
6.34 
6.44 
7.20 
1L40 

$17.50 

1134 

16  50 

17.05 

1188 

15.50 

10  37 

7.52 

150 

a33 

7.71 

6.26 

ao4 

7.34 
9.80 
9.92 
9.43 
12.28 
10  87 
1L28 
11.89 
1L35 
10  91 
10  73 
482 
10  76 
9.79 
7.33 

aoo 
ao8 

7.87 
9.28 
9.58 

ao4 

9.78 
1L50 
1015 

7.01 
1112 
19.68 
16.90 
1196 
2LO0 
16.83 
3110 
1185 
16  63 
10  71 
1138 

$17.  55 
1140 
17.20 

14  m 

1157 
14  14 

14  40 
12.56 
12.41 
9.49 

ins 

7.35 
11.73 

*« 

i.  id 

188 
130 
1115 
9.91 
1156 
1117 
1L97 
1153 
!     " 
9.10 
1137 

10  09 
165 

iaoo 

7.99 

100 

7.85 

7.60 

11.37 

12.06 

1125 

120 

11  OS 
1100 
11  67 
12.99 
2178 
1168 
24  36 
2121 
22.64 
1L77 
1155 

$17.  77 
14  93 
1181 
1153 
12.65 
14  04 
1194 
1192 
1158 

a  n 

124 
193 
9.98 
193 

126 
7.48 
7.92 

1L02 
7.81 
151 

1198 

11.15 
9.69 
196 
7.07 
149 

1L19 
7.97 

a  24 

7.77 

a53 

7.65 
7.31 
15.62 
1150 
198 
118 
1124 
14  70 
1165 
14  01 
2L65 
17.84 
19.45 
1168 
1120 
14  87 
1179 

$16.  47 
1160 
1168 
1130 
11.94 
14  74 
12.96 
1100 
12.88 
1L56 
1169 

9.07 
11.62 

122 
1126 

114 

7.74 
1109 

9.93 

9.60 
1172 

9.80 
1119 

aoo 

7.72 
a  98 
9.75 
7.67 
5.87 
9.60 
7.80 

aos 

9.98 
3  -* 

14  08 
12  24 
7.63 
9.76 
17.34 
11.78 
1128 
1L17 
22.  27 
17.67 
2131 
19.65 
19.31 
1186 
19.44 

$11  55 
14  10 

■    ■ 

1176 

12  35 

14  49 

12.65 

1L84 

12.24 

12.48 

9.97 

194 

9.40 

7.19 

1% 

aoo 

124 

1L10 

9.53 

9.94 

1168 

1153 

9.00 

140 

a  16 

a  95 

a  97 

7.44 
7.59 

158 
7.88 

a42 

9.25 
7.20 
12.56 
1L88 
9.57 
a53 
17.76 
1136 
14  35 
17.11 
19.97 
17.51 
19.34 
1155 
2150 
1136 
14  28 

$1175 

15.18 

1100 

\'i--i.'  -  nnntt  - .       

14% 

TMwMlp  T^lftTHi  .  . 

1119 

14  36 

V:,rk 

12.92 

1111 

10.41 

9.31 

■.-  1 

9.65 

7.74 

■   ,i 

^■aroliTifl . 

7.94 

South  Carolina 

1154 

168 

9.52 

Ohio 

1182 

9.02 

9.14 

1113 

1L59 

MiniM'jjMiUi 

8L77 

9.13 

7.52 

178 

Sooth  Dakota 

9.10 

Willi  ■  ill  ■ 

7.67 

7.32 



117 

182 

■  ■ t i_  ■  i 

1  ;  -  ;  - 

:  naiana 



•    ■" 
182 
7.74 
14  27 
1194 

'  V  iv  -  -  i                                _   

9.63 

5.61 
1186 
12.25 

14  56 

1L55 

11.02 

16.80 
1L20 

-  a 

a  61 
14  21 
12. « 

14  68 
15.91 

■     ■ 

1170 
1     - 
1O80 
16.50 

6.46 
14  82 
12.00 
1L34 
10  56 

1160 

12.92 

-i.  :•: 

12.30 
14  57 

7.77 
16.38 
16  07 
14  10 
14  45 

1180 

14  64 
1176 
7.59 
1L32 

161 



Wyoming 



19.01 
1180 
1118 

17.99 







Hah " 

qgton 

":•;£•  ■ 

OaBfionria 

22.36 
19.66 
24  S3 
17.50 
17.71 
14  53 
1138 

rare 

. 

7.23 

-  :. 

7.63 

10.29 

1160 

1 

1115 

9.89 

/  oats  per  bushel  in  th-e  United  States,  December  l.  189", 
8tak 


'-    -  ■ 

It  " 

1891 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

Maine 

.    :■ 

— '           1  BMtbl 

CcnU. 
32 
• 
32 
33 
34 
34 
27 
30 
S 
23 
26 
29 
30 
37 
45 
42 
53 
20 
19 

Cent*. 
34 
■ 
35 
37 
37 
36 
31 
31 
30 
30 
29 
29 
30 
37 
45 
48 
54 
24 
23 

Cents. 
38 
39 
37 
38 
37 
37 
33 
33 
29 
25 
30 
33 
35 
41 
47 
48 
50 
25 
23 

Cenit. 
38 
38 
36 
38 
38 
35 
32 
31 
30 
30 
31 
37 
34 
45 
48 
49 
50 
26 
23 

Cents. 

50 
52 
50 
55 
54 
54 

47 
45 
45 
41 
42 
43 
51 
62 
67 
72 
39 
38 

Cents. 
45 

44 
43 
45 
43 
41 
36 
39 
34 
42 
38 
42 
41 
51 
59 
53 
61 
32 
28 

Cent*. 
45 

48 
44 
49 
45 
45 
41 
43 
37 
40 
40 
43 
46 
52 
59 
55 
60 
36 
32 

Cents. 
45 
47 
44 
45 
47 
44 
38 
40 
38 
41 
36 
43 
44 
52 
60 
55 
60 
32 
30 

Cents. 
43 
43 
40 
43 
42 
42 
37 
37 
36 
40 
36 
39 
39 
47 
55 
53 
52 
31 
27 

Cent?. 
44 
44 
43 
44 

R)WMfc»  Tk1«ti<1 

45 

42 

fa* 

40 

38 

38 

38 

38 

43 

40 

rjrolmi. 

49 

57 



Florida 

Ohio 

Indiana. 

56 
68 
33 
32 

STATISTICS    OF    OATS. 


567 


Average  farm  price  of  oats  per  bushel  in  the  United  States.  December  1,  1897-1906,  by 

States — Continued. 


State  or  Territory. 

1897. 

1898. 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

Bush. 
18 
23 
19 
19 
16 
19 
26 
18 
15 
18 
27 
28 
43 
44 
38 
27 

Bush. 
23 
27 
24 
21 
24 
23 
26 
21 
20 
22 
27 
28 
41 
42 
38 
28 

Bush. 
22 
28 
23 
22 
19 
24 
27 
23 
22 
22 
32 
32 
43 
50 
40 
30 

Bush. 
23 
26 
23 
24 
20 
23 
32 
24 
24 
23 
31 
35 
44 
46 
40 
30 

Bush. 
40 
41 
39 
34 
36 
43 
33 
34 
37 
43 
41 
45 
64 
63 
60 
60 
46 
50 
57 
36 
48 
50 
60 
60 
51 
70 
44 
35 
34 
44 

Bush. 
28 
33 
30 
27 
25 
28 
27 
29 
25 
30 
36 
42 
55 
51 
50 
49 
37 
34 
41 
36 
50 
51 
68 
75 
47 
70 
48 
49 
41 
51 

Bush. 
32 
36 
34 
30 
29 
32 
31 
29 
27 
30 
41 
42 
54 
51 
46 
44 
35 
34 
44 
35 
50 
41 
62 
61 
49 
68 
45 
38 
44 
54 

Bush. 
30 
33 
28 
26 
25 
34 
24 
25 
25 
33 
40 
37 
54 
52 
45 
44 
38 
36 
43 
46 
39 
46 
57 
74 
47 
63 
50 
43 
47 
57 

Bush. 
28 
30 
27 
24 
24 
30 
23 
23 
24 
28 
35 
39 
51 
50 
45 
40 
33 
29 
42 
43 
41 
41 
58 
64 
44 
52 
42 
41 
43 
51 

Bush. 
31 

33 

31 

27 

27 

33 

27 

25 

26 

31 

38 

41 

51 

49 

45 

Texas 

41 

32 

28 

33 
33 
35 
32 
41 

29 
35 
40 
41 
41 

34 
39 

40 
42 
44 

35 

42 
47 
43 
48 

42 

44 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

40 
45 
52 

65 

Utah 

33 

38 

40 

44 

45 
64 

32 
35 
35 
49 

36 

40 
40 
50 

38 
38 

41 
47 

40 
40 
41 
46 

43 

41 

43 

52 

General  average 

21.2 

25.5 

24.9 

25.8 

39.9 

30.7 

34.1 

31.3 

29.1 

31.7 

Wholesale  prices  of  oats  per  bushel  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


New  York. 

Baltimore. 

Cincin- 
nati. 

Chicago.   1 

Milwau- 
kee. 

Duluth. 

Detroit. 

San  Fran- 
cisco. 

Date. 

No.  2. 

No.  2, 

No.  2, 

No.  2, 

No.  2, 

No.  1,  white 

mixed. 

mixed. 

mixed. 

white. 

white. 

(perewt.). 

Lowj  High 

Low 

High 

Low 

High 

Low 

High 

Low 

High 

Low 

High 

Low 

High 

Low  |  High 

1902. 

Cts. 

as. 

as. 

Os. 

as. 

as. 

as. 

Os. 

as. 

as. 

Os. 

as. 

Os. 

as. 

Jan 

464 

53 

48 

52 

46 

50 

38* 

46* 

441 

49 

40* 

47i 

45 

50*11.25   $1.40 

Feb 

48 

50 

47 

49*. 

46 

48 

40} 

44i  1 

42} 

47 

38* 

431 

46 

47*    1.27*1  1.42* 

Mar 

46} 

52 

47*. 

49 

454 

47 

40} 

45* 

44 

47 

40 

43 

46 

48}l  1.25  |  1.40 

Apr .... 

46* 

49* 

47* 

49 

44 

46* 

41 

44*' 

43} 

47} 

40 

46* 

46 

48*    1.27*    1.45 

May 

45* 

48 

47* 

48*. 

44 

46 

41 

49* 

441 

46 

42* 

45* 

46 

48* 

1.35 

1.50 

June 

444 

55 

47* 

55 

43 

52 

39 

48* 

43 

54 

28} 

34 

464 

57 

1.35 

1.50 

July.... 

55 

64} 

54 

60 

32} 

57 

30 

56 

51* 

58 

304 

34* 

57 

61 

1.20 

1.35 

Aug 

34* 

65 

31 

59 

27 

31 

25 

31 

331 

58 

27* 

30 

34} 

60 

1.15 

1.30 

Sept 

32 

35 

29 

32 

28* 

31* 

26* 

27J1 

31* 

35 

29 

31* 

36} 

39* 

1.17* 

1.30 

Oct 

33 

34* 

29* 

33*. 

30 

32 

27} 

30 

32 

34 

29* 

32 

38* 

41} 

1.15 

1.32* 

Nov 

34 

36 

32* 

35*. 

29* 

34 

274 

29* 

30* 

34 

28* 

32 

41} 

48 

1.20 

1.35 

Dec 

36 

38} 

35* 

40 

33 

39 

29* 

32  1 

32* 

34 

31 

32 

48* 

51 

1.25 

1.40 

1903. 
Jan 

38* 

44 

39* 

42* 

35 

39 

31} 

34* 

33* 

36} 

32* 

34* 

36 

38 

1.22* 

1.35 

Feb 

42*. 

43} 

39* 

41 

37* 

39* 

334 

36 

36 

36} 

34 

35* 

38 

40 

1.22* 

1.374 

Mar. 

42 

44* 

40 

41* 

37 

39 

31} 

34| 

36 

36 

31 

34* 

38 

39 

1.22* 

1.32* 

Apr 

38 

42 

38 

414 

33* 

37 

32* 

35} 

36 

36} 

32* 

33* 

364 

38* 

1.20 

1.324 

May...- 

38 

39* 

37* 

39 

33 

37* 

33* 

38} 

36 

38 

33* 

35* 

37 

39 

1.20 

1.30 

June 

39} 

43* 

38* 

44 

36 

43* 

35* 

43J 

36* 

40* 

35 

40 

39 

45 

1.17* 

1.274 

July.... 

40 

43 

36* 

44 

31* 

41* 

33* 

45 

364 

41 

32* 

37* 

36 

41* 

1.17* 

1.30 

Aug 

38 

404 

34* 

39 

33 

35J 

33* 

36} 

37 

38* 

34 

35* 

35* 

36} 

1.17* 

1.324 

Sept 

38 

42 

39 

41* 

35 

39 

35* 

38 

37 

40 

35} 

38* 

3V* 

40 

1.17* 

1.324 

Oct 

40* 

42 

40 

41 

36* 

39 

34* 

38* 

37* 

39 

35 

37* 

38* 

39} 

1.20 

1.324 

Nov.... 

40 

42 

38* 

40* 

35* 

37* 

331 

38* 

36* 

38* 

32* 

35} 

36* 

38* 

1.25 

1.324 

Dec 

40*. 

42* 

39 

40*. 

37 

39 

34i 

38  : 

37* 

38 

34} 

35* 

37* 

39 

1.25 

1.324 

568 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Wholesale  prices  of  oats  -per  bushel  in  leading  cities  of  the    United  States,  1902-1906 — 

Continued. 


Date. 


1904. 
Jan . . 
Feb.. 
Mar.. 
Apr. . 
May . . 
June.. 
July.. 
Aug . . 
Sept . . 
Oct... 
Nov . . 
Dec. 


1905 
Jan. . 
Feb.. 
Mar. . 
Apr. . 
May. 
June. 
July. 
Aug. 
Sept. 
Oct . . 
Nov. 
Dec. 


1906. 
Jan . . . 
Feb... 
Mar. . . 
Apr. . 
May.. 
June.. 
July.. 
Aug.. 
Sept. . . 
Oct... 
Nov.. 
Dec... 


New  York. 


No.  2, 
mixed. 

Low  High 


Cts. 
42J 
46 
46 
43i 
45! 
443 
41 
35! 
34| 
34J 
35 
34i 


3."..'. 
36 
35| 

34J 

34? 

34A 

33  j 

29 

29 

32? 

34? 

36 


36 
34 

34  J 

36| 

37 

39 

40 

34', 

34 1 

37! 

37? 


as. 

45J 

55! 

55! 

47 

47 

46 

45 

43 

36 

36 

35 

36! 


37j 
37 

37?. 
36 
35! 

30" 
36! 

33" 
33?. 
37,j 
36 

37 


37J 

36 
36! 

37" 

39 

47. 

43  A 

39" 

37? 

3SJ. 

39? 

3?) 


Baltimore. 


No.  2, 
mixed. 


Low  High 


as. 

41 
43 

45! 

43 

43! 

43! 

43! 

34! 

33 

33 

33 

35! 


36J 

37. 
35 

33? 

33? 

33? 

33 

27?, 

28" 

32 

34 

34 


34? 

34" 

34$ 

35! 

37! 

38? 

3SJ 

33?" 

34" 

37 

37 


Cincin- 
nati. 


No.  2, 
mixed. 


LowHigh 


as.    as. 

43!     38 
41! 


47J 
162 

47,? 

453 

47,? 
47," 
35 
34 
351 
36 


37 

304 
3(3 1 
352 
34? 
362 
36! 
322 
32? 
35" 
34] 
36i, 


41 
40 
412 

41 

40 

32* 

33" 

31 1 

31 

32] 


32] 
32] 

3l| 

30* 
301 
32*, 
28 
25 
26 
29 
31? 
33" 


37 

37,? 
37,] 
38 
39 
45! 

42! '  34 
39J  30 
37  ,  31! 
373  35 
38!  35 
39!   36 


322 

32 
32 
33 

33 
37 


422 

44i 
44? 
43" 
424 
44" 
412 
402 
34?" 
33* 
331 
333 


33? 
33? 
34? 
32?, 

32? 


Chicago. 


No. 


Low  High 


34 
32 
30 
32 

33? 
35? 


as 

36! 

39| 

38 

36| 

391 

39| 

38! 

31! 

29§ 

28J, 

29 


2y£ 
29? 
293 

28] 
2V, 


33!l  30J 


27 
25} 

25 
27! 

29" 
29? 


34 

29! 

33? 

29* 

33? 

28* 

35 

30* 

3/ 

32* 

43 

m 

41 

303 

34 

29* 

36 

80 

30? 

32i 

30.? 

33 

38 

33 

41! 

46 

423 

411 

44f 

421 

45 

40 

334 

31! 

32J 

32 


31 
323 

33J 
32 
32 
333 

341 
29? 
30" 
30? 
31? 
32] 


32 

30] 
29| 

32] 

34] 

42] 

39J 

32 

341 

34] 

351 

35| 


Milwau- 
kee. 


No.  2, 
white. 


Low  High 


as. 

35 

40 

39 

37 

41 

38 

37 

31| 

29! 

28! 

294 

29" 


31! 

32 

32 

32 

313 

33 

33 

27J 

28 

29 

31 

31! 

No  3 
30 
29 
29 
30J 
32 
333 
33 
29 
29 
32 
32 
324 


as. 

41 

444 

44" 

433 

45 

44 

41 

42 

33! 

33 

32 

32 


32! 

33 

34! 

33! 

34 

34! 

35! 

34 

30 

32 

32 

33! 

white 
32 
31! 
32i 
333 
35! 
43 
40 
35! 
34 
34! 
343 
354 


Duluth. 


No.  3. 


Low  H  igh 


as. 

35! 

38| 

38i 

37J 

40 

40 

36 

321 

30 

273 

29 

28J 

(a) 

283 
28|; 
28! 
28! 
28| 
301 
27!! 
25! 
251 


29 
284 
2sl 
291 
31 1 
33] 
31] 
30 
291 

31  i 
32 
31 1 


as. 

39! 

421 

401 

41 

43 

42! 

38 

38 

32| 

30| 

29| 

29| 


30 

m 

29] 

312 

34? 

41" 

38 

31 

33 

33 

32; 

34 


Detroit. 


No.  3, 
white. 


Low  High 


I 
Cts. 

39  ! 
423 
44 

42! 

45 

424 

414 

33": 

32 

313 

32 

324 


33! 

33ii 

334! 

33  j 

33 

333 

35 

27  j 

261 

29J 

323 

323 


33 

32! 

32  j 

33J 

35! 

37i 

38 

32  i 

33 

36 

364 

35 


as. 

42! 

48i 

46! 

451 

45! 

46! 

44 

43! 

33! 

34 

32!    1 

3341  1 


San  Fran- 
cisco. 


No.  1,  white 
(per  cwt.  1. 


Low    High 


25  SI.  37! 
25  1.372 
27?  1.372 
274  1.40 
324  1.50 
40  I  1.50 
1.50 
1.50 
1.  52! 
1.55 
1.60 
1.60 


34!  1-45 
343  1.45 
34!  1.45 
341  1.45 
343,  1.45 
34![  1.65 

37    

35! 

30!    1-374    1.47! 
323    1.37!    1.45 


1.00 

1.60 

1.60 

1.68 

1.672 

1.80 


35 

33] 

34 

35 

371 

43? 

42 

39 

362 

362 

382 

37 


1.374    1.50 
1.45"!  1. 


a  No  grade  of  oats  in  Duluth  for  1905. 

BARLEY. 

Barley  crop  of  countries  named,  1902-1906. 
[Substantially  the  crop  of  the  world.] 


Country. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

NORTH  AMERICA. 

United  States 

Bushels. 
134,954.000 

Bushels. 
131,861,000 

Bushels. 
139,749,000 

Bushels. 
136,651,000 

Bushels. 
178,916,000 

Canada: 

New  Brunswick 

110.000 

22, 580, 000 

12,222.000 

308.000 

488,000 

3,000,000 

108,000 

25,147,000 

8,982,000 

687,000 
1,111,000 
3,000,000 

96,000 

25,342,000 

11,530,000 

617,000 

1,659.000 

3,000,000 

100,000 

25,030.000 

14,507,000 

922,000 

1,830,000 

3,000.000 

102,000 

Ontario 

26,049,000 

Manitoba 

18,085,000 

1,358,000 

Alberta 

2,242,000 

Other 

3,000,000 

Total  Canada 

38,708,000 

39,035,000 

42,244,000 

45,389,000 

50,836,000 

6,045,000 

9,061,000 

7,355,000 

6,000,000 

6,000.000 

Total  North  America 

179.707,000 

179,957,000 

189,348,000 

188,040,000 

235.752,000 

STATISTICS    OF    BARLEY.  569 

Barley  crop  of  countries  named,  190g-1906 — Continued. 


Country. 


EUROPE. 

Austria-Hungary: 

Austria 

Hungary  proper 

Croatia-Slavonia 

Bosnia-Herzegovina . 


Bushels. 
73,788,000 
62,350,000 
3,259.000 
3.208,000 


Total  Austria-Hungary. 


142,005,000 


Belgium 

Bulgaria 

Denmark 

Finland 

France 

Germany 

Italy 

Netherlands. 

Norway 

Roumania . . . 


4,974,000 

11,000,000 

23,287,000 

3,628,000 

41,948,000 

142, 392, 000 

6,000,000 

4,652,000 

2,143,000 

24,586,000 


Russia: 

Russia  proper 

Poland 

Northern  Caucasia. 


274,899,000 
22,185,000 
35.530,000 


1903. 


1904. 


Bushels. 

73,873,000 

64,577,000 

3,839,000 

4.145,000 


Bushels. 
66,815,000 
49,915,000 
2,285,000 
3,496.000 


146,434.000       122,511,000 


3,923,000 
12,773,000 
23,340,000 
5,233,000 
43,345,000 
152,653,000 
8,000,000 
3,823,000 
3,255,000 
29,716,000 


5,003,000 

12,911,000 

22, 708, 000 

4,916,000 

38,338.000 

135,409,000 

7,000,000 

3,606,000 

2,496,000 

11,567,000 


1905. 


Bushels. 
70,469,000 
62,452,000 
2,804.000 
3.236.000 


139,021,000 


4,518.000 

12,080,000 

21,146,000 

5,000,000 

40,841,000 

134,204.000 

8,000,000 

4,013,000 

3,464.000 

26,383.000 


289,699,000  290,766,000  272,694,000 
20,819,000  !  17,705,000  22,732,000 
39,980,000  |      31,254,000         43,430,000 


Total  Russia  (European). 


Servia . . 
Spain . . 

Sweden. 


United  Kingdom: 
Great  Britain- 
England  

Scotland 

Wales 

Ireland 


332,614,000  i     350,498,000  I     339,725,000  |     338,856,000 


3.495,000 
81,279.000 
12,283,000 


3.424,000 
64,359,000 
13,570,000 


3,162,000 
53, 800, 000 
13,452,000 


3,670,000 
45,974,000 
12, 858, 000 


56,679,000 
8.394,000 
3,518,000 
8,273,000 


50, 628, 000 
7,739,000 
2,981,000 
6.0/6,000 


48,511.000 
7,408,000 
3,077,000 
5,478,000 


48,778,000 
8,257,000 
2.906,000 
7,181,000 


Total  United  Kingdom . 

Total  Europe '     913, 750, 000 

ASIA. 


76,864,000  J      67,424,000  !       64,474,000  !      67,122,000 


931.770,000       841,078,000'     867.150,000 


Cyprus. 

Japanese  Empire: 

Japan 

Formosa 


1,374,000 


3, 969, 000 


3,122,000 


3,000,000 


74.078.000 
13.000 


59,737,000 
38,000 


80.795.000  ! 
58.000  ! 


.  436, 000 
50,000 


Total  Japanese  Empire . 

Russia: 

Central  Asia 

Siberia 


3,775,000  :      80,853,000 


,  486. 000 


Bushels. 
76,024,000 
69,747,000 
3.007,000 
3.000.000 


152,384,000 


5,000,000 

12,882.000 

22,000.000 

5,000,000 

37,004,000 

142,901,000 

8,000,000 

4,000,000 

3,000.000 

33,539,000 


Total  Russia  (Asiatic). . 
Total  Asia 

AFRICA. 


3,008,000 
2,828,000 


2,759,000 
4,213.000 


2,262.000 
4.268,000 


3,145.000 
4,965,000 


6, 972, 000 


8.110,000 


70,710,000 


Algeria . 
Anglo-Egyptian  Sudan. 

Cape  of  Good  Hope 

Natal 

Tunis 


47.912,000 

200,000 

800.000 

8,000 

3,201.000 


Total  Africa. 


52.121,000 


AUSTRALASIA. 

Australia: 

Queensland 

New  South  Wales. . 

Victoria 

South  Australia 

Western  Australia. 
Tasmania 


286, 000 
107,000 
716,000 
251,000 
37,000 
173.000 


38,  496, 000 

216,000 

949,000 

4,000 

11,322,000 


50,987,000 


4,000 

19,000 

579,000 

327,000 

48,000 

207.000 


Total    Australian    Com- 
monwealth   


1,570,000 


1,184,000 


New  Zealand 

Total  Australasia. 


883,000 


1,172,000 


2.453.000 


2,356,000 


Grand  total 1, 229, 132, 000   1, 235.,  786, 000 


90,505.000  ,       88,596,000 


36,125,000 

251.000 

850,000 

6,000 

14,815.000 


52.047.000 


35,000.000 

327,000 

8.50,000 

7,000 

7,119,000 


43,303,000 


527,000 
180,000 
1.256,000 
503,000 
55,000 
219,000 


342.000 
275,000 
902,000 
35S.000 
39,000 
168,000 


2,740.000 


2,084,000 


1,104,000 


3.248.000 


1,176,915,000  1,190.337,000 


243,020,000 
23,351.000 
37,319.000 


304.290,000 


4,848,000 
91,185.000 
14,952,000 


51,543,000 
7,803.000 
3,116,000 
7, 000.  OIK) 


69,462.000 


910, 447. 000 


73,000.000 
50,000 


73.050.000 


5,136,000 
2,614,000 


7.  750. 000 


83,800,000 


40,000.000 
300,000 
850.000 

6.000 

7,863,000 


49.019.000 


04,000 
115,000 
1,096,000 
522.000 
51.000 
97.000 


1,945,000 


1,056,000 


3.001.000 


1, 282, 019, 000 


570 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


1'isibh  supply  of  barley  in  the   United  States  and  Canada,  first  of  each  month,  for  ten 

years.11 


Month. 


July 

August. . . 
September 
October... 
November. 
December. 
January. . 
February. 
March.... 

April 

May 

June 


1897-98. 


Bushels. 
1,574,000 
1,051,000 
1,578,000 
2,630,000 
4,267,000 
6,318,000 
5,115,000 
3, 455, 000 
2,571,000 
1,492,000 
1, 159, 000 
815, 000 


Bushels. 

587, 000 

584, 000 

548, 000 

2. 125, 000 

3, 777, 000 

4,406,000 

4, 372, 000 

4,017,000 

3,067,000 

2,626,000 

1,913,000 

1,555,000 


1899-1900. 


1900-1901. 


Bu 
1, 

1, 
1, 
3, 
4, 
3, 


shels. 

Bushels. 

059,000 

1,038,000 

694,000 

702,000 

055,000 

1, 158, 000 

739,000 

2, 779, 000 

925,000 

5,396,000 

695, 000 

6,053.000 

122, 000 

5,395,000 

303,000 

4,331,000 

138,000 

3,903,000 

712,000 

2, 879. 000 

720,000 

1,761,000 

267,000 

1,351.000 

1901-2. 


Bushels. 

528,000 

335,000 

956,000 

3,610,000 

4, 813, 000 

5, 416, 000 

4,580,000 

5,244,000 

5,065,000 

4,075,000 

2,146.000 

1,836,000 


Month. 


July 

August . . . 
September 
October... 
November 
December. 
January  . 
February. 

March 

April 

May 

June 


Bushels. 

847,000 

217,000 

419. 000 

2,460,000 

5,064,000 

5,680.000 

4, 389, 000 

3,843,000 

3,107,000 

2, 426, 000 

1,493,000 

1,133,000 


Bushels. 
602,000 
471,000 
1,024,000 
5,017,000 
7, 313, 000 
7,975,000 
6,907,000 
6, 338, 000 
5,441,000 
1,975,000 
3, 969, 000 
3,105,000 


Bushels. 
2,046,000 
1,656,000 
1,694,000 
6,551,000 
9, 329, 000 
9, 620, 000 

10, 403, 000 
8,  S01, 000 
6, 952, 000 
4,674,000 
3,354,000 
2,231,000 


Bushels. 
2,557,000 
1,031.000 
1,358,000 
5,524,000 
8,509,000 
10,217,000 
10,657,000 
8,526,000 
7, 686, 000 
6,567,000 
4,251,000 
2,053,000 


1906-7. 


Bushels. 
1,620,000 
1,814,000 
1,244,000 
3, 520, 000 
4,476,000 
5, 156, 000 
4, 698, 000 
4, 137, 000 
3,  034.  000 
3,708,000 
3,441,000 


o  These  figures  represent  stocks  available  at  62  of  the  principal  points  of  accumulation  east  of  the 
Rocky  Mountains,  stocks  in  Manitoba  elevators,  and  stocks  afloat  on  lakes  and  canals  as  reported  by 
Bradstreet's. 

Condition  of  the  barley  crop  of  the  United  States,  monthly,  1891-1906. 


Year. 

June. 

July. 

Au- 
gust. 

Sep- 
tem- 
ber. 

Year. 

June. 

July. 

Au- 
gust. 

Sep- 
tem- 
ber. 

1891 

P.  ct. 

90.3 
92.1 
88.3 
82.2 
90.3 
98.0 
87.4 
78.8 

P.  ct. 
90.9 
92.0 
8S.8 
76.8 
91.9 
88.1 
88.5 
85.7 

P.  ct. 

93.8 
91.1 
84.6 
69.8 
87.2 
82.9 
87.5 
79.3 

P.  ct. 
94.3 
87.4 
83.8 
71.5 
87.6 
83.1 
86.4 
79.2 

1899 

P.  ct. 
91.4 
86.2 
98.8 
93.6 
91.5 
90.5 
93.7 
93.5 

P.  ct. 
92.0 
76.3 
91.3 
93.7 
86.8 
88.5 
91.5 
92.5 

P.  ct. 
93.6 
71.6 
86.9 
90.2 
83.4 
88.1 
89.5 
90.3 

P.  ct. 

86.7 

1892 

1900 

70.7 

1893 

1901 

85.8 

1894 

1902 

89.7 

1895 

1903 

82.1 

1896 

1904 

87.4 

1897 

87.8 

189S 

1906 

89.4 

Acreage,  production,  value,  prices,  exports,  etc.,  of  barley  of  the  United  States,  1866-1906. 


Av- 

Chicagocashpriceper 

Av- 

erage 
farm 
price 
per 

bushel,  No.  2. 

Domestic 

exports, 

fiscal 

year 

Imports, 
fiscal 
year 
begin- 

Year. 

Acreage. 

erage 
yield 

Produc- 
tion. 

Farm 
value, 
Dec.  1. 

December. 

May  of 
following 

bush- 

year. 

beginning 

ning 

el 

July  1. 

July  1. 

Dec.l. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

.4  cres. 

Bush. 

Bushels. 

Cts. 

Dollars. 

as. 

as. 

as. 

as. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

1866 

492,532 

22.9 

11.283.807 

70.2 

7.916,342       59 

70 

85 

100 

3,247,250 

1867 

1,131,217:    22.7 

25,727,000     70.1 

18.027,746     150 

180 

227 

250 

9.810 

3,783,966 

1868.... 

937, 498j     24.  A 

22,896,100,  109.0 

24.948. 127      140 

170 

149 

175 

59,077 

5,069,880 

1869. . . . 

1,025,795!     27.9 

28,  652.  200      70.  8 

20. 29S. 164        74 

85 

50 

62 

255,490   6,727,597 

1870. . . . 

1,108,924     23.7 

26,  295,  4(>o!     79. 1 

20,  792, 213       68 

80 

72 

95 

340,093    4,866,700 

1871 

1,113,735     24.0 

26,718,500]     75.8 

20.264,0151       55J 

64 

55 

71 

86, 891 1  5,565.591 

1872.... 

1,397,082     19.2 

26,846,4001     68. 6 

18, 415, 839       60 

70 

71 

85 

482,410   4,244.751 

1873.... 

1,387,106 

23.1 

32,044,491 

86.7 

27,794,229 

132 

158 

130 

155 

320. 399 

4,891,189 

STATISTICS    OF    BARLEY. 


571 


Acreage,  production,  value,  prices,  exports,  etc.,  of  barley  of  the  United  States,  1866-1906 — ■ 

Continued. 


Av- 

Chicago cash  price  per 

Av- 

erage 
farm 
price 
per 

bushel, 

No.  2. 

a 

Domestic 

Imports, 
fiscal 
year 
begin- 

Ye* 

ir.     Acreage. 

erage 
yield 
per 
acre. 

Produc- 
tion. 

Farm 
value, 

December. 

May  of 
following 

fiscal 
year 

bush- 

year. 

beginning 

ning 

el 

July  1. 

July  1. 

Dec.l. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Acres. 

Bush. 

Bushels. 

Cts. 

Dollars. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

Cts. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

1874 

...    1,580,626 

20.6 

32,552,500 

86.0 

27, 997, 824 

120 

129* 

115 

137 

91,118 

6,255,003 

1875 

...    1,789.902 

20.6 

36,908,600 

741 

27,367,522 

81 

88 

62* 

72* 

317,781 

10,285,957 

1876 

...    1,766,511 

21.9 

38, 710, 500 

63.0 

24,  402. 691 

63| 

68* 

80 

85 

1, 186, 129 

6, 702, 965 

1877 

...    1,614,654 

21.3 

34,  441, 400 

62.8 

21,629,130 

56} 

64 

461 

52* 

3,921,501 

6, 764, 228 

1878 

...    1,790,400 

23.6 

42, 245, 630 

57.9 

24,454,301 

91 

100 

64 

73 

715,536 

5, 720, 979 

1879 

...    1,680,700 

24.0 

40, 283, 100 

58.9 

23,714,444 

86 

92 

75 

80 

1, 128, 923 

7, 135, 258 

1880 

...    1,843,329 

24.5 

45, 165, 346 

66.6 

30,090,742 

100 

120 

95 

105 

885,246 

9, 528, 616 

1881 

...    1,967,510 

20.9 

41,161,330 

82.3 

33, 862, 513 

101 

107 

100 

100 

205, 930 

12, 182, 722 

1882 

...    2,272,103 

21.5 

48,953,926 

62.9 

30, 768, 015 

79 

82 

80 

80 

433,005 

10,050,087 

1883 

...    2,379,009 

21.1 

50, 136, 097 

58.7 

29, 420,  423 

62 

67 

65 

74 

724, 955 

8, 596, 122 

1884 

...    2,608,818 

23.5 

61,203,000 

48.7 

29, 779, 170 

53 

58 

65 

65 

629, 13C 

9, 986. 507 

1885 

...    2,729,359 

21.4 

58,360,000     56.3 

32,867,696 

62 

65 

58 

60 

252, 183 

10,197,115 

188(5 

...    2,652,957 

22.4 

59,  428, 000     53. 6 

31,840,510 

51 

.  54 

57 

57 

1,305,300 

10, 355, 594 

188/ 

...    2,901,953 

19.6 

56, 812, 000 

51.9 

29,464,390 

80 

80 

69 

77 

550,884 

10,831,461 

I8KK 

...    2,996,382 

21.3 

63,884,000 

59.0 

37,672,032 

1,440,321 

11  368,414 

1889 

...1  3,220,834 

24.3 

78,332,976 

41.6 

32, 614, 271 

58 

58 

1,408,311 

11,332,545 

1890 

...    3,135,302 

21.4 

67,168,344 

62.7 

42, 140, 502 

973, 062 
2, 800, 075 
3,035,267 

5,078,733 
3,146,328 

1891 

...   3,352,579 

25.9 

86,839,153 

52.4 

45,470,342 

1892 

...[  3,400,361 

23.6 

80,096,762 

47.5 

38,026,062 

65 

67 

65 

65 

1,970,129 

1893 

...1  3,220,371 

21.7 

69,869,495 

41.1 

28,729,386 

52 

54 

55 

60 

5,219,405 

791,061 

1894 

...    3,170,602 

19.4 

61,400,465 

44  2 

27, 134, 127 

53* 

55* 

51 

52 

1,563,754 

2,116,816 

1896 

...!  3,299,973 

26.4 

87,072,744 

33.7 

29,312,413 

33 

40 

25 

36 

7, 680, 331 

837, 384 

1890 

...    2,950,539 

23.6 

69, 695, 223 

32.3 

22,491,241 

22 

37 

24* 

35 

20,030,301 

1,271,787 

189/ 

...!  3,719.116 

24.5 

66,685,127 

37.7 

25, 142, 139 

25* 

42 

36 

53 

11,237,077 

124,804 

1898 

...    2,583,125 

21.6 

55, 792, 257 

41.3 

23,064,359 

40 

50* 

36 

42 

2, 267,  403 

110,475 

1899 

...    2.878,229 

25.5 

73,381,563 

40.3 

29, 594, 254 

35 

45 

36 

44 

23,661,662 

189, 757 

1900 

...    2, 894, 2S2 

20.4 

58,925,833 

40.8 

24,075,271 

37 

61 

37 

57 

6, 293, 207 

171,004 

1901 

...1  4,295,744 

25.6 

109, 932, 924 

45.2 

49, 705, 163 

56 

63 

64 

72 

8,714,265 

57,406 

1902 

...    4.661,063 

29.0 

134, 954, 023 

45.9 

61,898,634 

36 

70 

48 

56 

8, 429, 141 

56,462 

1903 

...    4,993,137 

26.4 

131,861,391 

45.6 

60,166,313 

42 

61* 

38 

59 

10,881,027 

90,708 

1904 

...    5,145,878 

27.2 

139, 748, 95* 

42.0 

58,651,807 

38 

52 

40 

50 

10,661,655 

81,020 

1905 

...    5.095,528 

26.8 

136,651,020 

40.3 

55,047,166 

37 

53 

42 

55* 

17,729,360 

18,049 

1906 

...    6.323,757 

28.3 

178,916,484 

41.5 

74, 235, 997 

44 

56 

"■  Prices  from  1895  on  are  for  No.  3  grade. 
Acreage,  production,  and  value  of  barley  in  the  United  States  in  1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territorv. 


Acreage. 


Average 

yield  per 

acre. 


Production. 


Average 
farm 
price 
Dec.  1. 


Farm 
value 
Dec.  1. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire 

Vermont 

New  York 

Pennsylvania . . . 

Maryland 

Virginia 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota. . 
South  Dakota . . 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Oklahoma 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 


Acres. 

7,661 

1,507 

12, 810 

86, 193 

8,518 

1,436 

2,398 

21,775 

8,486 

25,298 

70,000 

728,000 

1,128,265 

556,000 

1,048 

013,000 

790,000 

120,000 

359,000 

673 

1,045 

4,001 

15,666 

14,313 

3,000 

18,531 


Bushels. 
31.5 
21.4 
32.8 
26.3 
25.0 
31.0 
28.6 
30.0 
29.4 
30.0 
26.1 
30.7 
28.0 
28.3 
24  2 
25.8 
29.0 
28.0 
23.5 
26.0 
23.0 
24.5 
29.8 
33.0 
31.4 
41.0 


Bushels. 

241, 322 

32,250 

420,168 

2, 266, 876 

212, 950 

44, 516 

68,583 

653,250 

249,  488 

758, 940 

1,827,000 

22, 349, 600 

31, 591, 420 

15, 734, 800 

39,882 

15, 815,  400 

22,910,000 

3, 360, 000 

8, 436,  500 

17,  498 

24, 035 

112, 724 

466, 847 

472, 329 

94,200 

759, 771 


Cents. 
05 
64 
62 
55 
55 
47 
56 
46 
52 
42 
49 
45 
35 
35 
48 
33 
32 
31 
33 
55 
60 
61 
33 
56 
04 
54 


Dollars. 

156, 859 

20, 640 

260,504 

1,246,782 

117, 122 

20, 923 

38,  400 

300,  495 

129, 734 

318, 755 

895, 230 

10,057,320 

11, 056, 997 

5, 507, 180 

19, 143 

5, 219, 082 

7,331,200 

1,041,600 

2,784,045 

9,624 

14,421 

08,762 

154,060 

264, 504 

00,288 

410, 276 


572  TEAEBOOK    OF    THE    PEPABTMEXT    OF    AGBICULTfEE. 

production,  and  value  of  barley  in   the  United  States  in  1906.  by  State*— Can. 


State  or  Territory. 

Acr-    - 

Average 

yield  per 

acre. 

Prod  action. 

Average 
farm 
price 
Dec.  1. 

Farm 
value 
Dec.  1. 

Ac- 
hod 
13.404 
12.000 
7.089 
47.028 

59:862 
1.425.000 

1 

29 

42.2 
44.0 
36.8 
41.0 
36.5 
35-0 
27.2 

Bushels. 
15.012 

'    "     - 
528.000 
260.875 
1.C-- 
"    ■       2    1 
2.095.170 
-   7-0.000 

Cents. 

! 

54 

58 

- 
54 

Dollars. 

9.45S 

^°9.893 

285. 120 

180.004 

ington 

964.074 

1.089.  4S8 
20. 930. 400 

United  Stains 

23,757 

178  N     B4 

41.5 

74. 235. 997 

Average  yield  per  acre  of  barley  in  the  United  States.  1897—1906,  by  States. 


-  1   :e  or  Territory. 

>  ■• 

■>■'-. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

Mai-         

Bush. 
2-5.0 

22  • 
.-  ■ 
34.5 

25.0 
24.5 

Bush. 
27.0 
23.5 
30.0 
24.5 

.*  : 

25.2 
19.4 

Bush. 
29.0 
25.0 
31.0 
30.0 

:•■  : 

24.0 
21.0 

Bush. 
27.4 
22.7 
29.1 
.-    • 
28.0 
22.0 
19.0 

Bush. 
27.5 
21.5 

•  29.6 

Bush. 
29.4 
21.2 
29.7 

Bush. 

29.9 
19.8 
29.2 

Bush. 
32.7 
20.7 
33.1 

Bush. 
29.0 
20.8 
31.5 

Bush. 
31.5 

21.4 

32.8 

V---  Y-rV   

14.0 
17.2 
18.0 
24.9 
24.9 
25.4 
24.5 
22.8 
27  2 
25  : 
23.6 
1     : 
28.2 
22.  4 
16' 0 
15.9 
19.4 
16.8 
13.5 
22.0 
39.0 
32.5 
B   " 
31.7 

35.0 
33.0 
40.2 
43.5 
30.6 
26.0 

28.5 

21.0 
27.0 
18.3 
32.3 
2S.0 

28.6 
33.8 
28.6 
26.3 
25.0 
31.6 
29.2 
31.1 
16.0 
2-5.9 

21.  S 
36.0 
37.0 

24.4 

16.1 
25.2 
32.1 
34.3 
46.3 
43.7 
31.9 
! 

26.6 
21.3 
25.9 
24.4 
23.3 
22.8 
28.2 
25.2 
27.7 
25.3 
23.4 
18.3 
21.6 
31.4 
26.6 
31.9 
21.4 
20.6 
24.4 
26.9 
40.2 
21.3 
3S.3 
23.1 
32.8 
37.5 
34.6 
34.4 
37.9 
33.2 
25.7 

26.8 
22.6 
21.8 
24.7 
27.5 
29.2 
27.1 
24.1 
30.0 
28  -. 
23  - 
20.3 
28.1 
28.0 
27.4 
21.6 
20.6 
22.0 
31.0 
30.1 
29.9 
30.1 
37.1 
23.6 
33.6 
38.3 
35.9 
37.4 
34.8 
28.7 
22.7 

25.7 
25.0 
31.0 
28.0 
-     - 
28.0 
30.0 
27.0 
29.9 
27.0 
26.0 
23.0 
28.0 
30.0 
27.5 
22.0 
24.0 
21.6 
24.0 
26.0 
33.0 
31.7 
33.0 
21.0 
44.0 
37.0 
34.0 
40.0 
40.0 
31.0 
21.5 



26.3 

25.0 

31.0 



a 

Ohio        

a  - 

19.0 

25.0 
21.5 
28.0 
25.5 
24.0 
19.0 
22.5 
20.0 
22.0 
17.5 
20.0 
18.0 
25-0 

28.7 
23.4 
27.3 
25.2 
29.1 
28.4 
26.0 
20.0 
.     - 
23.0 
27.1 
28.0 
16.0 
18.0 
20.0 

- 

25.0 

29.0 

24.0 

30.0 

25.0 

26.0 

18.0 

24.0 

23.0 

26.0 

17.0 

21.0 

11.0 

18.0 

27.0 
.-. 

25.6 
23.9 
25.5 
22.4 
26.4 
20.8 
8.2 
14.3 
17.6 
21.5 
-• 

14.7 
24.6 

30.0 

20.4 

30.0 

30.7 

28.0 

Iowa 

iri 

-■ 

24.2 

25.8 

290 

28.0 

23.5 

. 

23.0 

SM.S 

29.8 

M  mtana 

380 

36.0 

350 

33.0 
31.4 

32.5 

30.5 
33.8 

28.0 
32.0 

24.8 
29.0 

41.0 

- 
42.2 

Utah     .          

31.0 

35.0 
45.0 
32.5 
23.0 

37.0 

35.0 
39.8 
29.1 
10.5 

33. 0 

35.0 
35.0 

.-   " 
;    26.0 

36.5 

-    ■ 
33.4 

>    - 
16.7 

44.0 

lington 

Oregon 

California 

36.8 
41.0 
36-5 
35.0 
27.2 

24  r 

21.6 

25.5 

20.4 

25.6 

29.0 

26.4 

'-  ~ 

:■  * 

2S.3 

ot  value  per  acre  of  barley  in  the  U  States,  based  upon  farm  \  oJ  .her  1, 

n  rr-i 


state  or  Terntorv. 


1900.      1901.      1902. 


titit 


1904.      1905. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire . 
Vermont 

Vi;;.  :"--:5---?. . 
P.i.:  -.-:  '.-..--.. . . 

New  York 

i  ~".=j.~i.~::-. . . . 

Maryland 

Virginia 

Ohio 


13.50 
13.11 

22.77 
15.12 
10.50 
9.55 


13.63 
14.10 
16.17 
17.  OS 
12.10 
8.54 


S17. 11 
16.25 
16.12 

-■:  4' 

20.30 
12.00 
10.29 


16.99  ;$1S.43  $19.99 
15.21  17.20  15.90 
15. 13  19. 54  18. 12 

17. 80    

21.56 
11.22 
9.50 


121.23  $23.22  $19.72  $20.48 
16.63  15.53  15.18  13.70 
17.52     21.8-5     21.18       20.34 


11.69     12.(3     12.t<j     11.61 


"    -4 

10.15 
9.36 
11.70 
12.70 


15.68 
11.34 
13.23 

-     8^ 

15.83 


14.63 
11.93 
12.95 
13.91 
11.65 


15.28 
12.66 
13.95 
15.07 
14.30 


13.  SS 
13.75 

14.88 
15.40 
11.79 


14.47 
13.75 
14.57 
16.02 
13.80 


STATISTICS    OF    BARLEY. 


573 


Average  value  per  acre  of  barley  in  the  United  States,  based  upon  farm  valve  December  1 , 
1897-1906,  by  States— Continued. 


State  or  territory. 


Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota 

South  Dakota 

Nebraska 5. 

Kansas 4. 

Kentucky 8. 

Tennessee I  10. 

Texas ;  10. 

Oklahoma 

Montana I  19. 

Wyoming 

Colorado I  14. 

New  Mexico 17. 

Arizona I 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 


1898. 


$10.30 
10. 65 
11.09 
11.64 
9.37 
8.84 
7.20 
7.66 
6.21 
6.78 
7.56 
6.40 
10.08 
10.00 


1899. 


$11.25 
13.63 
11.52 
12.00 
7.75 
8.06 
7.56 
7.92 
6.67 
7.80 
4.59 
9.03 
7.04 
11.88 


20.52  i  17.85 


$11.56 
12.03 
11.23 
11.22 
8.51 
9.77 
9.36 
2.87 
4.43 
5.81 
7.10 
15.73 
9.11 
17.71 


14.03 

18.59 


General  average . 


13.95  |  17.39 


16.80 
17.91 
14.26 
6.82 


9.25       8.93 


15. 40 
19.52 


17.16 


16. 10 
15.40 
14.00 
13.00 


18.62 


12.40 
17.98 


20.07 


16.40 
13.03 
12.14 
7.18 


$12.95 
12.99 
12.31 
13.87 
11.61 
11.09 
9.08 
11.28 
9.41 
6.56 
7.15 
13.77 
11.76 
11.88 
10.78 
22.23 
21.12 
18.08 
20.61 
19.52 
18.55 
23.10 
21.31 
17.83 
14.99 
10.66 


$12.88 
12.58 
14.87 
15.55 
10.58 

9.47 
13.75 
11.38 
11.10 
10.26 

6.08 
14.50 

9.76 
15.34 
15.12 
18.87 
18.30 
15.78 
11.43 
22.93 
18.94 
27.44 
24.54 
20.10 
16.59 
16.38 


10.28 


8.32  I  11.57 


$11.40 
12.41 
13.10 
13.30 
9.36 
8.42 
9.88 
7.78 
10.36 
8.78 
10.85 
13. 48 
13.39 
17.08 
11.84 
23.32 
15.34 
23.36 
14.78 
23.62 
22.13 
29.41 
17.89 
18.95 
19.59 
15.68 


1904. 


$14.02 
11.65 
13.25 
12.90 
9.09 
10.01 
12.59 
7.87 
8.96 
8.49 
7.99 
13.39 
14.08 
22.63 
12.04 
18.54 
17.16 
21.15 
21.24 
31.25 
21.83 
25.85 
23.56 
17.05 
16.93 
13.62 


13.28  !  12.05 


1905. 


$12.60 
12.60 
12.69 
12.26 
8.64 
7.80 
10.12 
8.40 
8.70 
8.52 
7.04 
10.56 
12.31 
15.84 
10.40 
18.48 
18.70 
17.49 
14.49 
35.64 
19.61 
23.80 
19.20 
18.80 
16.12 
12.68 


1906. 


11.40 


10. 


$15.  29 
12.60 
12.79 
13.82 
9.80 
0.90 
11.62 
8.51 
9.28 
8.68 
7.76 
14.30 
13.80 
14.95 
9.83 
18.48 
20.10 
22.14 
17.01 
32.07 
23.76 
25.39 
20.50 
17.89 
18.20 
14.69 


11.74 


Average  farm  price  of  barley  per  bushel  in  the  United  States  December  1,  1897-1906,  by 

States. 


State  or  Territory. 

1897. 

1898. 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

Cents. 
55 
60 
46 
66 
54 
42 
39 

Cents. 
56 
58 
47 
66 
61 
48 
44 

Cents. 
59 
65 
52 
68 
70 
50 
49 

Cents. 
62 
67 
52 
69 
77 
51 
50 

Cents. 
67 
80 
66 

Cents. 
68 
75 
61 

Cents. 
71 
84 
60 

Cents. 
71 

75 
66 

Cents. 
68 
73 
54 

Cents. 
65 

64 

Vermont 

62 

L 

56 
59 
52 
47 
51 
51 
53 
54 
51 
45 
47 
55 
40 
42 
41 
45 
71 
70 
88 
49 
52 
65 
63 
65 
68 
53 
70 
53 
41 
49 
41 

56 

54 
49 
54 
49 
46 
44 
52 
46 
37 
36 
55 
36 
38 
33 
38 
56 
61 
72 
42 
51 
75 
60 
71 
91 
59 
80 
53 
46 
52 
63 

55 
56 
50 
57 
50 
50 
44 
52 
48 
37 
36 
54 
36 
33 
33 
34 
63 
65 
70 
44 
58 
72 
61 
64 
72 
59 
85 
52 
50 
59 
61 

57 
56 
64 
61 
52 
48 
43 
55 
43 
32 
36 
62 
28 
32 
31 
37 
65 
64 
73 
40 
62 
57 
.57 
90 
93 
57 
72 
63 
49 
59 
60 

54 
55 
48 
55 
45 
45 
42 
47 
41 
32 
30 
44 
30 
29 
31 
32 
44 
57 
66 
40 
56 
59 
53 
69 
81 
53 
70 
48 
47 
52 
59 

55 

55 

47 

56 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

41 
44 
38 
40 
32 
24 
24 
40 
27 
22 
24 
25 
40 
59 
43 

44 
44 
39 
44 
40 
33 
34 
36 
29 
27 
25 
27 
40 
56 
50 

45 
45 
47 
48 
40 
31 
31 
42 
33 
29 
30 
27 
43 
64 
66 

43 
47 
47 
47 
44 
38 
37 
45 
35 
31 
33 
33 
55 
62 
72 

46 
52 
42 
49 
45 
35 
35 
48 

33 

32 

Nebraska 

31 
33 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Texas 

55 
60 
61 
33 

Montana 

50 

57 

51 

48 

56 

64 

51 
55 

46 
55 

55 
61 

50 
62 

54 

New  Mexico 

63 
76 

Utah 

45 

47 

52 

55 

54 

69 

42 

43 

.     45 

54 

48 
45 
49 
65 

46 
44 
50 
50 

50 
39 
42 
43 

50 

49 

52 

54 

37.7 

41.3 

40.3 

40.8 

45.2 

45.9 

45.6 

42.0 

40.3 

41.5 

574  YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGBICULTUEE. 

Average  yield  of  barley  in  certain  countries,  in  bushel*  per  acre,  U 


189" 

i 

23.6 
24  5 
21.6 
25.5 
20.4 
25.6 
29.0 
26.4 
- 

!     : 

1 

12.8 

U-8 

14  9 
11.1 
11.4 
11.2 
15.6 
15.  5 
14  4 
14  3 

30.7 
29.0 
32.2 
33.8 
33.4 
33.3 
35.1 
36.2 
33.6 
33.3 

19.3 
17.6 
22.0 
24  9 
20-2 
22.5 
24  5 

24  0 

M 

a 

23.6 
24  0 
20.9 

2ao 

25.1 

- 

- 
J 

fl   " 
.     • 
2L1 
24  5 

B 
23  4 

:  . 

1897 

.    > 

1S9S 

■  - 

1899 

•  " 

1900 

.  " 

1901 ...           

1902   

36.9 

1903 

..    i 

1904 

1905 

35.9 

\verage 

25.1 

13.3 

33.1 

22.3 

22.4 

B   i 

:-:  • 

3  Winchester  bushels. 


:  UBds. 


Wholesale  :irley  per  bushel  in  hading  citi.es  of  tin  Dmtt  1908-1906. 


Cincinnati. 

Chicago. 

?t.  Lords.     ' 

_■  . '  -  -  .:    _• 

San  Fran- 

Date. 

EltT;.    - 

spring. 

Ha 

Malting. 

medium  to 

choice. 

- 

- 

Low.    High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low.    High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low.    High. 

1902. 

Cents.    Cents. 
67           70 

Cent*. 

■  ■ 
■• 
61 
64 
64 
48 
41 
38 
35 
35 
36 

45 
47 
46 
46 
48 
49 
47 
47 

a 

46 
43 

42 

37 
40 
40 
38 
38 
35 
36 
38 
38 
37 
38 
38 

38 
37 
40 
40 
40 
43 

Cents. 
65} 
64 
67 
70 
". 
71 
73 
65 
63 
60 
58 
70 

56 
55 
55 
56 
54 
53 
57 
63 
. 
61} 
61} 

61 
61 
54 
60 
59 
59 

I 

54 
53 
52 

50 

48 

49} 

50 

50 

CenU.    Cents. 

59           66 
56 

>-.:■• 
54 
51 
51 

a 

56 

50 
41 
35 

a; 

32 

30 
30 

35 
-. 
40 
40 
40 
40 
34 
54 
40 
35 
33 
30 

32 
36 
34 
33 
33 
32 

a 

30 
33 

32 
32 
33 

33 

36 
37 
36 

39 

Cents. 

-  . 
B 

-. 

il 

67 
52 
63 
62 
69 
60 
60 

-- 
00 

> 

■- 

0 

52 

:' 

55 

'" 

a 

57 

" 

0 

••• 
54 

-  . 
■- 

*_ 

50 
53 

56 
47 
46 
if 

45 
45 

44 
44 

46 

46 

$0-80 
.90 

M   E 

n 

67 
! 

69 
70 

74 
69 
69 

.     -: 

95 

1.02} 

60 

• 

1.03} 

:  .-. 

92}     1.01J 

Julv 

92}     1.00 

55 
55 
55 
55 

55 
56 
56 
55 

55 
55 

65 
65 
65 
65 

65 
65 
65 
62 
62 
62 

52           67 
50           62 
i-           61 

61 

50           61 
50           61 
50           61 

48 

4S           57 

96}     1.15 

.        1.25 

LIS}     1.30 

-'-■      -     -: 

1903. 

No.  1  feed. 

L15           - 

Llli 

1.05 

1.05 

.90 

•  97} 

:  :■-: 

:  :>H 
i.iii 

L10 
1.07} 

1  r-; 

L«f 

.95 

1.05 

1     " 

:  .-.- 

:  j 

L16i 

Mav 

1.UJ 

.  :> 

JulT 

L10 

1.13* 

61 
62 
60 

60 

-  . 
■  - 
62 
62 

71 
69 
69 
69 

69 
69 
69 
69 
69 
69 

55 

- 

1.16J 

54           65 
50           64 

49  63 

48           65 

50  65 

4S            64 
1 

1.16} 

1.15 

LIS 

1904 

L13i 

L15 

1.15 

April 

:  :- 

Mav 

:  M 

1.06i 

July 

1  03} 

59 

59 
45  !        54 
44 

1.10 

1.12} 

55 
55 
55 

52 

a 

52 
52 
54 
54 

62 
60 
60 

58 
58 
58 
58 
58 
58 

i  m 

L13j 

_ 

1905. 

45 

45 
47 

53 
■<53 
51 

48 

i  aj 

:  -■ 

:  :>: 

1  ■ 

May 

l  ■ 

June. .       .                 

L35 

STATISTICS    OF    RYE. 


575 


Wholesale  prices  of  barley  per  bushel  in  leading  citus  of  the  United  States.  1902-1906 — 

Continued. 


Date. 


Cincinnati.    |      Chicago. 


Extra  No.  3. 
spring. 


No.  3. 


Low. 


High. 


Low. 


High. 


St.  Louis. 


Malting, 

medium  to 

choice. 


Low. 


High. 


Minneapolis. 


San  Fran- 
cisco. 


No.  1,  feed 
(per  cwt.). 


Low.  '  High.    Low.    High. 


July 

August 

September. 
October . . . 
November. 
December. . 


1905 


January . . . 
February . . 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October... 
November . 
December. . 


1906. 


Cents. 
54 
54 
54 
54 
54 
54 


Cents. 
58 
58 
58 
58 
58 
58 


52 

61 

52 

61 

56 

62 

07 

62 

Cents. 
40 
37J 
374 
36* 
374. 
37 


Cents. 
52 
50 
52 
53 
55 
53 


51 

53 

53 

55j 

58 

54 

53 

55 

56 

56 

56 


Cents. 


Cents. 


46 
45 
45 

a  414 

a46" 

a  47 

a  41 

a36 

46 

45 

46 

49 


534 
52" 
534 
o42 
a  47 
<•  51 
a45 
<»38 
57 
58 
58 
58§ 


Cents. 
35 
30 
32 
32 
34 
34 


Cents. 
48 
48 
47 


$1.10 

1.021 
1.05" 
1.10  j 
1. 224J 
1.22J 


$1.30 
1.10 
1.13| 
1.30 
1.27J 
1.27J 


a  Feed  barley. 
RYE. 


Rye  crop  of  countries  named,  1902-1906. 
[Substantially  the  crop  of  the  world.] 


Country. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

NOETH  AMERICA. 

Bushels. 
33,631,000 

Bushels. 
29,363,000 

Bushels. 
27,242.000 

Bushels. 
28,486,000 

Bushels. 
33, 375, 000 

Canada: 

Ontario 

Manitoba 

Other 

3,620,000 
51,000 
800,000 

3,064,000 
51,000 
800,000 

2,065,000 
130.000 
800,000 

1,769,000 
179.000 
800,000 

1,369,000 
104,000 
800,000 

4,471.000 

3,915,000 

2,995,000 

2,748,000 

2.273,000 

Mexico 

100,000 

136,000 

67,000 

60,000 

60,000 

38,202,000 

33, 414, 000 

30, 304, 000 

31,294,000 

35,708,000 

EUROPE. 

Austria-Hungary: 

82, 482, 000 

49,458,000 

3,049,000 

257,000 

81,130,000 

47,355,000 

3,386,000 

396,000 

91,685.000 

43,880.000 

2,038,000 

360,000 

98, 192, 000 

54,089,000 

2,537,000 

374,000 

99,246,000 

51,962,000 

2,409,000 

Bosnia-Herzegovina 

395,000 

Total  Austria-Hungary... 

135,246,000 

132,267,000 

137,963,000 

155,192,000 

154,012,000 

22. 374, 000 

8,000,000 
18,779,000 

8,841,000 

47,051,000 

373, 768, 000 

3,200,000 

13,971,000 

776,000 

6,958,000 

21,756,000 

7,750.000 

19, 305, 000 

10,598,000 

57,951,000 

389, 923, 000 

4,000.000 

13,973,000 

857,000 

7,145,000 

21,988.000 

7,772,000 

16,546,000 

10,362,000 

52,141,000 

396,075,000 

3,000,000 

13,517,000 

717,000 

2,201,000 

21,349,000 

7,541,000 
19,245,000 

9,000.000 
58,116,000 
378,204,000 

4,000,000 

13,742,000 

982,000 

7,344,000 

22, 000, 000 

Bulgaria 

10,818,000 
19,000,000 

Finland 

10,000,000 
51,095,000 

378, 948, 000 

Italy 

Netherlands 

Norway 

Roumania 

4,000,000 

14,000.000 

800,000 

8,900,000 

576  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGBICUI/TUKB. 

Rye  crop  of  countries  named,  1902-1906 — Continued. 


Country. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

190.x 

1906. 

ECROPE— continued. 
Russia: 

Bushels. 
S10.537.000 
75.2-57.000 
■'4.000 

Bu-'hels. 
803.290.000 
69.100.000 

7.49-8.000 

Bu< 

893,205.000 

76.606.000 

8.179.000 

Bu~ 
n,  ooo 

-S.OOO 
"■3.000 

Bushel*. 
56S.200.000 

Poland.'.    * 

6.400.000 

Total  Russia  ^European). 

S'i4.  448.000 

829,894,000 

CC7.OQ0.000 

70S.  709, 000 

638,400,000 

Servia 1.084.000  i  1,091.000  1.031.000 

Spain 36,187,000  22.511.000  14.1S5.OO0 

Sweden 22.293.000.  23.9X1.000  20.708.000 

Crrted  Kingdom 2.000.000  2.000.000  2.000.000 

Total  Europe 

ASIA. 

Russia: 

Central  Asia 

Siberia 


1,103.000  1.560.000 

26.500.000  31.S2S.000 

24.393.000  26.247.000 

2.000.000  2.000.000 


1.584.970.000    1. 594.381. 000    1.078.196.000   1,437.420.000     1.373.008,000 


1.489.000 
23.080.000 


1.066.000 
30,982,000 


1.088.000 
29.300.000 


690.000 
28.043.000 


000. 000 
29,900.000 


Total  Russia  v  Asiatic) ! 

Total  Asia 


24.569.000         32.048.000         30.448.000         28.733.000 


30. 500. 000 


24.569.000         32.048.000         30.44S.000         28.733.000 


30.500.000 


ArSTEA.LA.SIA. 

Australia: 

Queensland 

New  South  Wales 

Victoria 

Western  Australia 

Tasmania 

Total    Australian    Com- 
monwealth.   

New  Zealand. 28,000  40.000  21.000  33.000  05.000 

Total  Australasia. 98.000  118.000  152.000  118.000  164.000 

Grand  total 1,647.S45.000   1,659.961.000   1.739.100.000   1,497,565,000     1,439,980,000 


7.000 

35.000 

22.000 

5.000 

9.000 

2.000 
83.000 
31.000 

4.000 
11.000 

1.000 
35.000 
32.000 

5.000 
12.000 

2.000 

39.000 
15.000 
3.000 
13.000 

51.000 
30.000 
5.000 
11.000 

70,000 

78.000 

131,000 

85.000 

99.000 

Visible  supply  of  rye  in  the  United  States  (nwi  Canada,  first  of  each  month,  for  ten  years." 


Month. 

1897-98. 

1898-99. 

1899-1900. 

1900-1901. 

1901-2. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Bu*~: 

Julv 

2.404.000 

9SS.O0O 

904.000 

806.000 

August 

1,946.000 

305.000 

638.000 

725.000 

753.000 

iber 

2.499.000 

721.000 

1 

1,056.000 

1.804.000 

3.004.000 
3.832.000 

894.000 
1.200.000 

962.000 
1.906.000 

1.210.000 
1.513.000 

2.440.000 

November 

.   -3.000 

December 

3.932.000 

1.212.000 

-■2.000 

1.754.000 

Januarv 

4.430.000 

1.573.000 

-"<.000 

"1.000 

3.257.000 

Febrnirv 

4.291.000 

1.570.000 

1.734.000 

1,530.000 

.70.000 

March 

4.099.000 

1.724.000 

1.000 

1.532.000 

-     72.000 

April 

-2.000 

1.0.58.000 

1.500.000 

1.333.000 

.     ..V.OOO 

Mar 

3.039.000 

1.335.000 

1.441.000 

1.112.000 

1.910.000 

June 

1.520.000 

• 

975.000 

1.206.000 

938.000 

950.000 

Month. 

1902-3. 

1903-4. 

1904-5. 

1905-6. 

1906-7. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Julv 

442.000 

926.000 

938.000 

920.000 

1.544.000 

Aueust 

328.000 

S67.000 

96S.000 

823.000 

1.480.000 

September 

903.000 

800.000 

1.233.000 

1.081.000 

29.000 

1,362.000 
1,828.000 
2.159.000 
"4.000 
2.3-54.000 
.   .73.000 
1.088. 000 

1.259.000 
".000 
1.744.000 
-.3.000 
1. "40.000 
1.717.000 
1,483,000 

1  -.80.000 
2.055.000 
2.525.000 
2.504.000 
.  2.59.000 
1.901.000 
1.554.000 

1.O2-.000 
2.251.000 
.  "  3.000 
2.990.000 
.   -  ".000 
2.723.000 
2.452.000 

1.793.000 

1.906.000 

-4.000 

2.038.000 

■  1.000 

-71.000 

April 

1.037.000 

May 

1.8"9.000 

1.554.000 

1.336.000 

1.954.000 

1.416.000 

2.027.000 

1.180.000 

1.064.000 

1.734.000 

a  These  figures  represent  stocks  available  at  62  ot  the  principal  points  of  accumulation  east  of  the 
Rocky  Mountains,  stocks  ir.  Manitoba  elevators,  and  stocks  afloat  on  lakes  and  canals,  as  reported  by 
Bradst  reefs. 


STATISTICS    OF    RYE.  577 

Acreage,  production,  value,  prices,  and  exports  of  rye  of  the  Vnited  States,  1866-imit:. 


Year. 


1866 
1867 
1868 
1869 
1870 
1871 
1872 
1873 
1874 
1875 
1876 
1877 
1878 
1879 
1880 
1881. 
1882 
1883 
1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 
1SSS 
1889 
1890 
1891 
1892 
1893 
1894 
1895 
1896 
1897 
1898 
1899 
1900 
1901 
1902 
1903 
1904 
1905 
1906 


Aver- 

age 

Acreage. 

yield 

per 

acre. 

Acres. 

Bush. 

1,548,033 

13.5 

1,689,175 

13.7 

1,651,321 

13.6 

1,657,584 

13.6 

1,176,137 

13.2 

1,069,531 

14.4 

1,048,654 

14.2 

1,150,355 

13.2 

1,116,716 

13.4 

1,359,788 

13.0 

1,468,374 

13.9 

1.412,902 

15.0 

1.622,700 

15.9 

1,625,450 

14.5 

1.767,619 

13.9 

1,789,100 

11.6 

2,227,894 

13.4 

2,314,754 

12.1 

2,343,963 

12.2 

2, 129, 301 

10.2 

2, 129. 918 

11.5 

2.053.447 

10.1 

2,364.805 

12.0 

2,171.493 

13.1 

2,141,853 

12.0 

2,176,466 

14.6 

2, 163, 657 

12.9 

2,038,485 

13.0 

1,944,780 

13.7 

1, 890, 345 

14.4 

1,831,201 

13.3 

1,703,561 

16.1 

1,643,207 

15.6 

1,659,308 

14.4 

1,591,362 

15.1 

1,987,505 

15.3 

1,978,548 

17.0 

1,906,894 

15.4 

1,792,673 

15.2 

1,730,159 

16.5 

2,001,904 

16.7 

Production. 


Bushels. 
20,864,944 
23,184,000 
22,504,800 
22, 527, 900 
15,473,600 
15, 365, 500 
14,888,600 
15.142,000 
14,990,900 
17,722,100 
20,374,800 
21,170,100 
25,842,790 
23, 639, 460 
24.540,829 
20. 704, 950 
29, 960, 037 
28,058,582 
28,640,000 
21,756.000 
24,489,000 
20,693.000 
28,415,000 
28,420,299 
25,807,472 
31,751,868 
27,894,037 
26, 555, 446 
26,727,615 
27,210,070 
24,369,047 
27, 363, 324 
25, 657, 522 
23,961,741 
23, 995, 927 
30,344,830 
33, 630, 592 
29,363,416 
27,241,515 
28,485,952 
33,374,833 


age 
farm 
price 
per 
bush- 
el, 
Dec.l. 


Cents 
82.2 

100.4 
94.9 
77.0 
73.2 
71.1 
67.6 
70.3 
77.4 
67.1 
61.4 
57.6 
52.5 
65.6 
75.6 
93.3 
61.5 
58.1 
51.9 
57.9 
53.8 
54.5 
58.8 
42.3 
62.9 
77.4 
54.2 
51.3 
50.1 
44.0 
40.9 
44.7 
46.3 
51.0 
51.2 
55.7 
50.8 
54.5 
68.8 
61.1 
58.9 


Farm  value, 
Dec.  1. 


Dollars. 
17,149,716 
23, 280, 584 
21,349,190 
17,341,861 
11,326,967 
10, 927, 623 
10,071,061 
10, 638, 258 
11,610,339 
11,894,223 
12,504,970 
12,201,759 
13,566,002 
15,507,431 
18,564.560 
19,327,415 
18,439,194 
16. 300, 503 
14,857.040 
12, 594, 820 
13,181,330 
11,283.140 
16,721,869 
12,009,752 
16, 229, 992 
24,589,217 
15,103,901 
13, 612, 222 
13,395,476 
11,964,826 
9, 960, 769 
12, 239, 647 
11,875,350 
12,214,118 
12,295.417 
16,909,742 
17,080,793 
15, 993, 871 
18, 748, 323 
17,414.138 
19,671.243 


Chicago  cash  price  per 
bushel,  No.  2. 


December. 


Low.  High 


as.    cts. 


132 
1064 

66 

67 

62 

57! 

70 

93 

67 

65! 

55! 

44 

73J 

82 

96* 

57 

56J 

51 

58! 

53 

55* 

50- 

44 

644 

86 

46 

45 

474. 

32 

37  ; 

453 

524 

49 

45? 

59 

48 

50J 

73 

64 

61 


157 
118 

77i 

74 

63J 

70 

81 

99| 

68r 

73 

56J 

44J 

81 

91! 

98 

58! 

60 

53 

61 

54! 

61! 

52 

45! 

68! 

92 

51 

47! 

49 

35s 

42! 

47 

55! 

52 

49f 

65| 

49| 

524 

75 

68 

65 


May  of 

following 

year. 


Low  J  High 


as. 

142 
173 
100 
78 
81 
75 
68! 
91 
103 
61! 
70 
54 
47 
73! 
115 
77 
62 
60! 
68 
58 
54! 
63 
39 
49! 
83 
70J 
50! 
44! 
62! 
33 
323 
48 
56! 
53 
51! 
54I 

482 
69s 
70 
58 


as. 

150 
185 
115! 
83! 
91 
93 
70 
102 
107! 
70! 
92! 
60 
52 
85 
118 
83 
67 
62! 
73 
61 
56! 
68 
41* 
54 
92 
79 
62 
48 
67 
364 
35! 
75 
62 
561 
54 
58 
50! 
78 
84 
62 


Domestic 
exports,  in- 
cluding 
rye  flour, 
fiscal  yea  r 
beginning 
Julvl. 


Bushels. 

234,971 

564,901 

92, 869 

199,450 

87, 174 

832, 689 

611, 749 

1,923,404 

267, 058 

589, 159 

2,234,856 

4,249,684 

4,877,821 

2,943,894 

1,955,155 

1,003.609 

2,206,212 

6,247,590 

2,974,390 

216, 699 

377, 302 

94, 827 

309,266 

2,280,975 

358, 263 

12,068,628 

1,493,924 

249, 152 

32,045 

1,011,128 

8, 575, 663 

15,562,035 

10,169,822 

2, d82, 012 

2, 345, 512 

2,712,077 

5,445,273 

784,068 

29, 749 

1,387,826 


Acreage,  production,  and  value  of  rye  in  the  United  States  in  1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Yermont 

Massachusetts 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia 

North  Carolina 

South  Carolina 

Georgia 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

3    A1906 37 


Acreage. 


A  cres. 

1,754 

3,977 

10, 569 

138, 081 

78,363 

346, 265 

1,037 

19, 704 

16,407 

11.336 

15,427 

4,015 

14,206 

52,000 

65,000 

64,324 

400,000 

267,427 

88,448 

52,711 

18,000 


Average 

yield  per 

acre. 


Bushels. 
17.4 
15.0 
18.0 
17.6 
17.2 
17.4 
15.0 
14.7 
13.4 
12.2 
11.0 
8.5 
8.3 
19.5 
17. C 
17.0 
14.5 
17.0 
19.3 
18.6 
15.8 


Production. 


Bushels. 

30,520 

59,655 

190,242 

2. 430, 226 

1,347,844 

6,025,011 

15,555 

289,649 

219,854 

138,299 

169,697 

34,128 

117,910 

1,014,000 

1,105,000 

1.093,508 

5,800,000 

4.546,259 

1,707,046 

980, 425 

284,400 


Average 
farm 
price 

Dec.  1. 


Cents. 
62 
65 
66 
65 
61 
64 
64 
60 
70 
70 
85 
125 
105 
57 
58 
56 
59 
58 
50 
50 
60 


Farm  value 
Dec.  1. 


Dollars. 

18,922 

38, 776 

125,560 

1,579,647 

822, 185 

3,856,007 

9,955 

173, 789 

153, 898 

96,809 

144, 242 

42,660 

123,806 

577,980 

640,900 

612, 364 

3,422,000 

2,636,830 

853,523 

490.212 

170. 640 


578  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Acreage,  production,  and  value  of  rye  in  the  United  States  in  1906,  by  States — Continued. 


State  or  Territory. 


North  Dakota  - 
South  Dakota. 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Texas 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

Utah 


Idaho 

Washington . 

Oregon 

California . . . 


United  States 2,001,904 


Acreage. 

Average 

yield  per 

acre. 

Production. 

Average 
farm 
price 
Dec.  1. 

Farm  value 
Dec.  1. 

Acres. 

Bushels. 

BusheU. 

Cents. 

Dollars. 

23,200 

18.7 

433.840 

47 

203. 905 

33,084 

18.8 

621.979 

45 

279.891 

95,000 

21.0 

1,995,000 

44 

877,800 

64,142 

16.0 

1,026,272 

50 

513, 136 

10, 675 

15.2 

162,260 

70 

113, 582 

10,036 

13.0 

130,468 

74 

96,546 

1,673 

12.5 

20.912 

105 

21,958 

4,728 

14.6 

69,029 

85 

58,675 

2,9.55 

13.9 

41,074 

57 

23.412 

1,971 

12.0 

23,652 

83 

19.631 

2,021 

20.5 

41,430 

66 

27.344 

428. 

19.0 

8,132 

72 

5,855 

2,179 

20.0 

43,580 

56 

24.405 

3,775 

24.0 

90,600 

65 

58,890 

1,575 

25.2 

39,690 

60 

23,814 

2,678 

19.6 

52,489 

65 

34, 118 

10.049 

17.2 

172, 843 

74 

127,904 

62,684 

12.8 

S02.355 

71 

569,672 

2,001,904 

16.7 

33, 374, 833 

58.9 

19,671,243 

Condition  of  the  rye  crop  of  the  United  States,  monthly,  1888-1907. 


Year. 

Decem- 
ber of 

previous 
year. 

April. 

May. 

June. 

July. 

August. 

When 
har- 
vested. 

1888 

Per  cent. 
96.0 
97.2 
96.4 
99.0 
88.8 
89.4 
94.6 
96.2 
94.9 
99.8 

Per  cent. 
93.5 
93.9 
92.8 
95.4 
87.0 
85.7 
94.4 
87.0 
82.9 
88.9 
92.1 
84.9 
84.8 
93.1 
85.4 
97  9 
82.3 
92.1 
90.9 
92.0 

Per  cent. 
92.9 
96.5 
93.5 
97.2 
88.9 
82.7 
90.7 
88.7 
87.7 
88.0 
94.5 
85.2 
88.5 
94.1 
83.4 
93.3 
81.2 
93.5 
93.0 
88.0 

Per  cent. 
93.9 
95.2 
92.3 
95.4 
91.0 
84.6 
93.2 
85.7 
85.2 
89.9 
97.1 
84.5 
87.6 
93.9 
88.1 
90.6 
86.3 
95.3 
89.9 

Per  cent. 
95.1 
96.7 
92.0 
93.9 
92.8 
85.3 
87.0 
80.7 
83.8 
93.4 
94.6 
84.9 
84.0 
93.5 
90.3 
89.3 
89.1 
92.9 
91.3 

Per  cent. 
91.4 
95.4 
86.8 
89.6 
89.8 
78.5 
79.8 
84.0 
88.0 
89.8 
93.7 
89.0 
76.0 
83.6 
90.5 
87.2 
91.8 
92.6 
90.8 

Per  cent. 
92.8 

1889 

91.6 

1890 

85.4 

1891 

95.1 

1892 

88.5 

1893 

82.0 

1894 

86.9 

1895 

83.7 

1896 

82.0 

1897 

90.1 

1898 

89.4 

1899 

98.9 
98.2 
99.1 
89.9 
98.1 
92.7 
90.5 
95.4 
96.2 

82.0 

1900   

84.2 

1901 

84.9 

1902 

90.2 

1903 

84.1 

1904 

86.9 

1905 

90.8 

1906 

90.5 

1907   . .                  

Average  yield  of  rye  in  certain  countries,  in  bushels  per  acre,  1896-1905. 


Year. 

United 
States. 

Russia. 

Ger- 
many. 

Austria. 

Hungary. 

France. 

Ireland. 

1896 

<«) 
13.3 
16.1 
15.6 
14.4 
15.1 
15.3 
17.0 
15.4 
15.2 
16.5 

10.9 
9.3 
10.5 
12.8 
12.5 
14.0 
12.5 
12.2 
13.7 
10.1 

22.7 
21.8 
24.2 
23.6 
22.9 
22.4 
24.5 
26.3 
26.3 
24.9 

TO 

16.3 
13.9 
17.7 
18.7 
13.0 
16.9 
18.2 
18.2 
19.3 
20.2 

TO 

18.2 
13.5 
16.9 
17.7 
15.1 
15.8 
19.1 
18.2 
17.1 
19.2 

TO 

18.7 
13.4 
18.3 
18.2 
16.9 
16.7 
14.3 
18.1 
16.6 
18.5 

TO 
25.4 

1897 

21.6 

1898 

25.8 

1899 

25.8 

1900 

25.6 

1901 

27.4 

1902 

28.0 

1903 

26.9 

1904 

26.0 

1905 

27.0 

15.4 

11.8 

24.0 

17.2 

17.1 

17.0 

26.0 

a  Winchester  bushels. 


6  Bushels  of  56  pounds. 


STATISTICS    OF    RYE.  579 

Average  yield  per  acre  of  rye  in  the  United  States,  1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire. 

Vermont 

Massachusetts. . 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania... 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia. .. 
North  Carolina.. 
South  Carolina. . 

Georgia 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota... 
South  Dakota... 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Texas 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

Utah 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 


General  average 16. 1 


Bush. 
13.5 
18.0 
16.0 
19.5 
19.0 
18.5 
17.0 
19.0 


17.0 
11.0 
11.5 
8.8 
6.6 
7.4 
18.0 
13.0 
15.5 
15.0 
16.0 
17.2 
16.0 
12.0 
14.5 
16.5 
17.0 
14.0 
13.0 
10.0 
9.6 
12.0 


Busk. 
18.0 
17.5 
19.1 
16.7 
18.0 
17.5 
15.5 
16.1 


14.5 
11.2 
11.2 
9.1 
8.5 
8.0 
17.4 
15.5 
14.8 
15.3 
15.3 
20.5 
19.0 
13.1 
15.0 
16.6 
18.8 
15.6 
13.0 
10.5 
11.1 
12.0 


Bush. 
15.0 
15.0 
17.0 
16.0 
18.0 
16.0 
15.0 
15.0 


1900. 


14.0 
9.0 
10.0 
7.0 
5.0 
6.0 
16.0 
13.0 
15.0 
14.0 
15.0 
18.0 
18.0 
13.0 
15.0 
15.0 
16.0 
11.0 
10.0 
9.0 
8.0 
10.0 


11.0  !     11.4       11.0 


15.0 
12.0 


18.0 
19.5 


19.5 
15.0 
12.2 


18.0 
14.4 
9.0 


14.0 
17.0 


Bush. 
17.2 
17.1 
16.6 
16.9 
17.0 
15.1 
15.9 
15.3 


16.0 
11.0 
15.0 


16.5 
10.5 
10.5 
8.9 
7.5 
7.0 
16.6 
15.1 
17.2 
14.6 
15.8 
19.5 
18.0 
14.0 
5.2 
10.6 
14.2 
15.2 
13.1 
11.0 
7.8 
16.5 


11.5 


16.8 
17.5 


16.3 
16.1 
13.0 


1901. 


Bush. 


18.3 
15.9 
18.0 
14.9 
15.0 
15.9 
15.3 
14.4 
11.1 
12.0 
8.5 
7.7 
7.6 
16.9 
14.5 
17.0 
14.0 
15.9 
19.3 
18.4 
14.2 
13.8 
14.4 
15.0 
14.3 
14.0 
11.3 
8.0 
11.1 
14.8 
8.7 
26.7 
24.0 
16.1 
14  2 
15. 0 
17.5 
15.7 
12.8 


15.3 


1902. 


Bush. 


16.9 
15.2 
17.4 
17.5 
16.4 
16.0 
13.5 
14.0 
9.6 
8.1 
8.2 
7.6 
6.3 
17.5 
14.5 
19.1 
17.9 
18.9 
22.3 
17.4 
18.2 
20.2 
18.8 
20.3 
12.0 
13.4 
11.0 
10.0 
9.9 
16.0 
12.3 
25.0 
18.0 
15.9 
12.4 
20.2 
17.8 
13.4 
12.0 


17.0 


1903. 


Bush. 


19.4 
13.7 
17.0 
15.2 
13.8 
15.6 
14.8 
13.7 
12.2 
11.5 
8.8 
7.6 
7.9 
15.3 
12.6 
16.5 
15.5 
16.6 
18.4 
16.9 
12.8 
15.7 
20.2 
14.2 
16.2 
11.6 
13.4 
10.6 
14.2 
17.9 
9.7 
24.6 
18.0 
18.3 
16.1 
18.5 
21.0 
14.2 
12.3 


1904. 


Bush.   Bush. 


16.9 
17.0 
16.9 
14.8 
17.5 
15.5 
11.8 
14.8 
15.7 
12.5 
9.9 
7.5 
8.3 
16.1 
14.6 
17.6 
13.2 
16.2 
17.7 
17.2 
14.4 
18.5 
16.5 
15.8 
13.2 
13.7 
11.7 
10.4 
13.1 
9.4 
11.1 
19.9 
19.5 
19.1 
16.0 
19.7 
19.0 
14.4 
7.6 


15.4 


15.2 


15.0 
15.5 
18.0 
16.0 
18.0 
17.0 
10.0 
14.5 
11.8 
11.8 
9.5 
8.1 
7.7 
18.0 
15.4 
18.0 
16.0 
16.5 
18.2 
17.5 
15.5 
19.5 
19.0 
18.0 
15.7 
15.0 
12.1 
11.7 
14.0 
12.1 
12.0 
20.0 
23.0 
19.0 
18.0 
25.0 
18.5 
15.0 
13.0 


Bush. 


17.4 
15.0 
18.0 
17.6 
17.2 
17.4 
15.0 
14.7 
13.4 
12.2 
11.0 
8.5 
8.3 
19.5 
17.0 
17.0 
14.5 
17.0 
19.3 
18.6 
15.8 
18.7 
18.8 
21.0 
16.0 
15.2 
13.0 
12.5 
14.6 
13.9 
12.0 
20.5 
19.0 
20.0 
24.0 
25.2 
19.6 
17.2 
12.8 


16.5 


16.7 


Average  value  per  acre  of  rye  in  the  United  States,  based  upon  farm  value,  December  1, 

1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire. 

Vermont 

Massachusetts. . . 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia... 
North  Carolina.. 
South  Carolina.. 

Georgia 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin. .. 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota... 
South  Dakota... 

Nebraska 

Kansas 


1897.      1898.   j   1899. 


$15. 12 
13.12 
11.08 
10.52 
10.80 
8.75 
7.75 
7.57 


$12.  60 
12.15 
10.54 
12.64 
11.52 
8.96 
8.25 
7.65 


1900. 


$14.10 
14.02 
10.13 
12.68 
11.05 
8.46 
8.74 
8.11 


7.82 

7.83 

7.98 

8.58 

5.50 

5.15 

4.77 

6.09 

5.87 

5.82 

6.20 

6.72 

5.28 

5.82 

5.25 

a  76 

5.68 

8.67 

5.45 

7.87 

6.81 

7.84 

6.72 

7.21 

7.92 

7.83 

8.80 

9.13 

5.46 

a  67 

6.24 

7.55 

6.82 

6.51 

7.05 

8.08 

6.30 

6.58 

7.28 

7.01 

6.56 

6.58 

7.20 

7.74 

6.36 

7:79 

7.56 

8.19 

5.76 

7.60 

7.20 

7.38 

5.28 

6.16 

6.50 

7.14 

5.22 

5.40 

5.55 

2.13 

5.78 

5.64 

5.55 

4  13 

5.44 

6.39 

aos 

5.68 

5.60 

5.77 

4.62 

a  54 

1901. 


$14.64 
12.56 
12.96 
9.24 
8.85 
9.54 
a  87 
&06 
a  77 
7.80 
a  63 

ass 

8.06 
9.30 
7.68 
9.69 
7.28 
a  27 
9.46 
9.20 
9.51 
5.93 
6.19 
6.90 
7.87 


1902. 


$iaoi 

12.16 

laos 

10.15 
10.00 
a48 

a  37 
a  12 

6.34 
5.51 
6.97 
a  59 
6.93 
9.27 
6.67 
9.55 
8.77 
9.45 
9.59 
7.31 
a  74 
a  69 
7.71 
7.31 
5.40 


1903. 


$12.  61 
10.00 
12.07 
9.27 
8.83 
9.67 
9.03 
8.08 
8.05 
&  17 
7.39 
a  13 
9.01 

a  87 

6.68 

ass 

7.90 
a30 

a28 

7.44 
7.04 
6.75 
a  08 
5.25 
7.13 


$12.  51 

li94 

13.35 

10.80 

12.25 

11.01 

a  61 

11.25 

11.62 

9.63 

a  61 

9.45 

a  47 

11.91 

10.07 

12.32 

9.50 

11.18 

11.33 

10.32 

9.22 

11.10 

9.41 

a  69 

a58 


1905. 


1906. 


$9.75 
12.25 
U32 
10.72 
11.88 
11.05 
6.60 
9.43 
a38 
8.26 
a  17  i 
9.64 
a39 
11.16 
9.24 
10.  SO 
9.44 
9.73 
9.65 
9.27 
9.61 
9.75 
9.31 
8.64 
a48 


$10.  79 
9.75 
11.88 
11.44 
10.49 
11.14 
9.60 
a  82 
9.38 
a  54 
9.35 
10.63 
a  72 
11.  12 
9.86 
9.52 
8.56 
9.86 
9.65 
9.30 
9.48 
a  79 
8.46 
9.24 

aoo 


580 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICUL/TURE. 


Average  value  per  acre  of  rye  in  the  United  States,  based  upon  farm  value,  December  1, 
1897-1906,  by  States — Continued. 


State  or  Territory. 

1897. 

1898. 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

$6.89 
5.80 

11.33 
8.64 

$7. 15 
5.56 

1L65 
8.52 

$7.00 
6.03 
8.32 
8.20 

S&2S 

7.48 
a  03 
1L05 

$9.& 
&36 
R32 
10.32 
10.36 
7.74 
16.02 
19.20 

a  ge 

9.23 
10.05 
10.85 
10.36 

7.30 

$a3i 
a  03 

10.50 
7.52 
7.52 
a9S 

16.00 
9.00 
a90 
7.  56 

12.12 

1L39 
9.78 
9.00 

fa  00 
9.92 
1L45 

10.51 
a95 
a  15 

15.50 
12.42 
1L16 
10.46 
12.02 
15.  12 

ia77 

9.47 

$10.96 
9.24 
12.48 
11.27 
5.83 
9.77 
15.32 
7.80 
12.41 
10.  72 
14.77 
15.  01 
12.  82 
5.93 

$10.65 
&32 
1134 
11.90 
7.50 
1L16 

noo 

14.26 
10.64 
1L70 
1100 
12.95 
12.15 
10.01 

'10  64 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Oklahoma 

9.62 
13.12 
12.41 

7  92 

Arti»nqfl<;     . 

a46 

7.41 

a  14 

&28 

g  •.. 

Montana 

13.53 

Wyoming 

1168 

Colorado 

Utah 

7.80 
7.20 

aoo 

8.97 

6.72 
8.16 

9.07 
9.10 

11.20 
15  60 

Idaho 

15  12 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 

12.09 
8.85 
7.93 

10.44 
10.37 
6.30 

9.60 

7.70 
11.70 

9.45 
9.82 
7.54 

12.74 
12.73 
9.09 

General  average 

7.18 

7.23 

7.36 

7.73 

a  51 

a63 

a39 

10.46 

10.07 

9.83 

Average  farm  price  of  rye  per  bushel  in  the    United  States,  December  1,  1897-1906.  by 

States. 


State  or  Territory. 

1897. 

1891 

1899. 

1900. 

190L 

1902. 

1901 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

Cents. 
82 
84 
60 
61 
59 
48 
50 
43 

Cents. 
84 
75 
58 
63 
60 
50 
50 
47 

Cents. 
84 
81 
62 
79 
64 
56 
55 
51 

Cents. 
82 
82 
61 
75 
65 
56 
55 
53 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

New  Hampshire 



Vermont 

80 
79 
72 
62 
59 
60 
58 
56 
61 
65 
78 
111 
106 
55 
53 
57 
52 
52 
49 
50 
67 
43 
43 
46 
55 
67 
74 
104 
93 
70 
89 
60 
80 
62 
' 
67 
62 
66 
57 

77 
80 
75 
58 
61 
53 
62 
58 
66 
68 
85 
113 
110 
53 
- 

50 
49 
50 
43 
42 
48 
43 
41 
36 
45 
62 
73 
105 
76 
47 
73 

50 

56 
'■1 
60 
64 

73 

'.' 

65 
73 
71 
61 
64 
62 
61 
59 
66 
71 
84 
107 
114 
58 
53 
52 
51 
50 
45 
44 
55 
43 
40 
37 
44 
69 
74 
108 
74 
50 
84 
63 
69 
61 
66 
65 
72 
97 
77 

74 
82 
79 
73 
70 
71 
73 
76 
74 
77 
87 
126 
102 
74 
69 
70 
72 
69 
64 
60 
64 
60 
57 
55 
65 
80 
79 
120 
86 
62 
88 
77 
40 
66 

.: 

75 

79 
89 
78 

65 

79 
74 
67 
66 
65 
66 
65 
71 
TO 
86 
119 
109 
62 
60 
60 
59 
59 
53 
53 
62 
50 
49 
48 
54 
71 
77 
114 
85 
62 
93 
65 
62 
56 
65 
56 
70 
81 
7, 

62 

Massachusetts 

65 

Connecticut 

66 

65 

61 

64 

64 

46 
50 
51 
60 
86 
92 
44 
42 
44 
42 
41 
37 
36 
44 
36 
15 
32 
40 
53 
58 
118 
72 

54 
46 
52 
64 

102 
98 
45 
43 
44 
43 
43 
38 
40 
47 
36 
34 
34 
37 
55 
53 

105 
71 

57 
53 
62 
75 
109 
112 
55 
48 
47 
52 
48 
42 
40 
50 
37 
37 
38 
42 
70 
67 
104 
82 

52 
58 
64 
76 
105 
103 
55 
50 
47 

« 

49 
42 
41 
51 
41 
39 
40 
43 
63 
68 
103 
67 

60 

70 

70 

85 

125 

105 

Ohio 

57 

Indiana 

Illinois 

58 
56 
59 
58 

50 

50 

60 

47 

45 

Kansas 

44 
.50 
70 
74 

Alabama 

Texas 

105 
B6 
57 

Arkansas 

65 

74 

72 

83 
66 

72 

Utah 

52 
60 

50 
46 

48 

4* 

54 

52 

56 
65 
60 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 

02 

59 
65 

58 
70 

60 
70 

n 

58 
61 

58 

65 

74 
71 

General  average 

44.7 

46.3 

51.0 

51.2 

55.  7 

50.8 

54.5 

618 

61.1 

58. 9 

STATISTICS    OF    RYE.  581 

Wholesale  prices  of  rye  per  bushel  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


Philadelphia. !    Cincinnati. 


Chicago. 


Date. 


January... 
February. . 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October.. . 
November. 
December. . 


1902. 


January... 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October... 
November. 
December . . 


January... 
February . . 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October.. . 
November. 
December.. 


January. . . 
February . . 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 

October 

November. 
December. . 


January. .. 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. . 


1903. 


Low. 


Cents. 
69 
68 
65 
64J 
64 


58 
56 
57] 
55] 

56 

54 


57 
til 
61 
59 
58 
56 
58i 


High. 


No.  2. 


Cents. 
71 
70 
69 
67 
66 


85 


79] 

72" 

63 

65f 

70 

73} 

68 

66* 


65 

63 

58.i 

58 

58 

60 

56 

55| 

55] 

62 

60 

61 


59 

-,s>. 
59 
■)»}. 
r.s.i 
58] 


61  i 
65j 
63 
60| 
60 
58 
60j 


80 

72 

96 
91 
87] 


87] 

90  J 

m 

83" 

75" 

66 
693 
76] 
76 
73 
73 


67 
65 
63 
62] 
62 
61] 
60 
56] 
62 
62] 
65 
65 


Low     High.    Low.    High. 


Cents. 
66 
64 
63 
62 
60 
54 
55] 
51 
52] 
52 
51 
51 


55] 

57} 

56 

55 

54 

57 

56 

55 

59] 

61 

58 

59 


80 
81] 

84 
80 
80 
80 
60 
56 
56 
67 
70 
70 


Cents.   Cents. 
71]'   56 


67 

65  I 

64  I 

63] 

59  [ 

58 

56 

55] 

53 

54 

56  I 


59 

58] 

-,sl 

58" 

58 

58 

57] 

60 

63 

63 

62 

62] 


64 

81 

80 

78 

80 
80 

78 
76] 
83 

87 
87 
86 


86 
86 
87 
86 
83 
83 
83 
60 
66 
74 
74\ 


64 
62 

tit; 
tiS1, 
72" 

:-2i 


56 
54] 
54] 
54] 

-)f>5 

.721 
48 

49 
4S 

48] 

48 


48 

48| 

485 
48 
48 
49 
49 
50] 
53 
53 
51] 
50] 


51 

56 

66 
69 
63] 
63 
62 
69] 
75 

76 
73 


~4] 

74' 

75 

73 

70 

75 

58 

57] 

60 

67 

(V, 

64 


Duluth.      iSa,n  Francisco 
(percwt.). 


Low. 


Cents. 
67] 
60] 
58 
57] 
58 
58 
61] 
54 
50] 
50] 
51] 
49f 


503 

51] 
51] 
51 
50] 

53j 
51] 
53] 
60 
56] 
58] 
52] 


75] 

78 

78] 

78] 

84 

79 

75 

60 

72 

73] 

72i 

68 


65 

63 
621. 
62" 
62 
60 
56A 
63" 

m 

65 
65 


Cents 
54 
53 
52 
52 
54 
55} 
51} 
46 
47i 
47" 
49 
48 


54] 
58 
63 

64 
65 
55 
55 
62 
72 
77 
74 
71 


72] 

73 
73] 

74 
70 
70 
57] 

55> 
59 
63 
62 
62 


High.  I  Low. 


Cents.    Cents 
64  77] 

57] 
54] 
56 
57 
56] 
58 
51 
49 
49 
49J 
49" 


49 
49 
49  \ 
50] 
50 
52 
50 
52] 
55] 
54 
54 
52] 


57 

73 

71 

68i 

69' 

67 

80 

75 

77 

791 

80 

74 


60 
61 
59 

57 

57 

57 

57  ! 

53 

56 

59] 

61 

61 


92] 
85 

95 

95 

85 

90 

85 

105 

102] 

110 

105 

110 

105 

115 

112] 

115 

112] 

117 

110 

117] 

110 

115 

110 

115 

110 

116J 

115 

120 

117] 

125 

120 

130 

125 

130 

125 

130 

125 

130 

125 

130 

127 

135 

130 

135 

130 

135 

130 

135 

130 

135 

125 

130 

125 

132] 

127] 

140 

137] 

140 

137] 

145 

140 

147] 

142] 

150 

145 

160 

150 

160 

150 

165 

155 

165 

160 

175 

140 

150 

147] 

152] 

150 

152] 

145 

152] 

145 

147] 

145 

1.50 

1 

;:•;;;;: 



582 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTTOE. 


BUCKWHEAT. 
Condition  of  the  buckwheat  crop  of  the  United  States,  monthly.  1SS7-1906. 


When 

When 

When 

Year. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

.  har- 
vested. 

Year. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

har- 
vested. 

Year. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

har- 
vested. 

P.cl. 

P.ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.ct. 

P.  ct 

P.ct 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

P.ct. 

1887 

93.3 

89.1 

76.6 

1894.... 

82.3 

69.2 

72.0 

1901.... 

91.1 

90.9 

90.5 

1888. 

92.5 

93.7 

79.1 

1S95.... 

So.  2 

S7.5 

1902. . . . 

91.4 

S6.4 

80.5 

1889 

95.2 

92.1 

90.0 

1S96.... 

96.0 

93.2 

S6.0 

1903. . . . 

93.9 

91.0 

83.0 

1890 

90.1 

90.5 

90.7 

1897.... 

94.9 

95.1 

90.8 

1904. . . . 

92.  S 

91.5 

1891 

97.3 

96.6 

92.7 

1898. . . . 

87.2 

88.  S 

76.2 

1905.... 

92.6 

91.8 

91.6 

1S92 

92.9 

89.0 

85.6 

1899.... 

93.2 

75.2 

70.2 

1906.... 

93.2 

91.2 

1S93 

88.8 

77.5 

73.5 

1900.... 

-" 

80.5 

72.  S 

Acreage,  production,  value,  and  prices  of  buckwheat  in  the  United  States.  1866- 


Average 

Year. 

Acreage. 

Average 

yield  per 

acre. 

Production. 

farm 

price  per 

bushel, 

Dec.  1. 

Farm  value, 
Dec.  1. 

Acres. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Dollars. 

1866 

1.045.624 

21.8 

22.791,839 

67.6 

15.413,160 

1867 

1.227.826 

17.4 

21.359.000 

78.7 

16.S12.070 

1868 

1.113.993 

17.  S 

19.863.700 

78.0 

15. 490.  426 

1869 

1.028.693 
536.992 

16.9 
IS.  3 

17.431.100 
9.841.500 

71.9 
70.5 

12.  -534, 851 

1870 

6.937.471 

1871 -. 

413.915 

20.1 

S.  32S.  700 

74.5 

6,  aw 

1S72 

448,  497 

18.1 

S.  133. 500 

73.5 

5. 979. 222 

1S73 

454.152 

17.3 

"   S7,7O0 

75.0 

'   £78,629 

1S74 

452.590 

17.7 

S.  016. 600 

72.9 

"    -43.645 

1875 

575.530 

17.5 

10.0S2.100 

62.0 

6. 254. 564 

1S76 

666.441 

14.5 

9.66S.800 

66.6 

6. 435. 836 

1877 

649.923 

15.7 

10.177.000 

66.9 

6,808  18 

1878 

673. 100 

18.2 

12. 246. 820 

52.6 

6.441.240 

1879 

639.900 

20.5 

13.140.000 

59.8 

7,856,191 

1880 

822.802 
82S.815 
847,132 

857.349 

914. 394 
917. 915 
910.506 
912. 630 
S37.162 

S49.364 
S61.451 
815.614 
7S9. 232 
763. 277 
754. S9S 
717,836 
678. 332 
670. 148 
637.930 
811.164 
B94  389 
804.393 
793. 625 
760.  US 
789.208 

J 

11.4 
13.0 
8.9 
12.6 
13.  S 
12.9 
11.9 
13.2 
14.5 
14.7 
15.0 
14.1 
14.9 
16.1 
20.1 
18.7 
20.9 
17.3 
16.6 
15.0 
18.6 
18.1 
17.7 
18.9 
19.2 
18.6 

14.617.535 
9.4S6.200 
11.019.353 
"       S.954 
11.116.000 
12.626.000 
11.S69.000 
10..44.000 
12.050.000 
12.110.329 
12.  432.  831 
12.760.932 
12.143.185 
12.122.311 
12.668.2O0 
15.341.399 
14,089.783 
14.997.451 
11.721.927 
11.094.473 
9.566.966 
15. 125. 939 
14.529.770 
14.243.644 
15.008,336 
14.585,082 
14.641.937 

59.4 
86.5 
73.0 
S2.2 
58.9 
55.9 
54.5 
56.5 
63.3 
50.5 
57.4 
57.0 
51.8 
58.4 
55.6 
45.2 
39.2 
42.1 
45.0 
55.  7 
55.8 
56.3 
59.6 
60.7 
62.2 
5S.7 
59.6 

■ 

1881                                          

S.  205. 705 

1882.              

1883...             ..              

6. 303. 980 

I«JW                      ..                 

6.549.020 

7.057.363 



1886                                              

6.465.120 

U87                                                

6. 122. 320 

188S                                                   

7,623     43 

1889                   -- 

6. 113. 119 

1890                                   

7.132.872 

1S91                                      

7.271.506 

1892                           

6.295.643 

1893                           

7.074.450 

1894                               

7. 040. 23S 

1895                                      - 

6.936.325 

1896.                            

5.522.339 

1S97                                      

6.319.188 

1898                                      

5.271.462 

1899 .                               

6. 1S3.  675 

1900                                     

5.341.413 

1901 

-   r 23. 317 

1902 ...                

64, 704 

1903 ...                

-  650,733 

1904..                  

9.330.768 

1905   .                      

■  -5.499 

1906 

•  "27.443 

STATISTICS    OF    BUCKWHEAT.  583 

Acreage,  production,  and  value  of  buckwheat  in  the  United  States  in  1906,  by  States. 


State. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire . 

Vermont 

Massachusetts.. 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania. . . 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia... 
North  Carolina. . 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Tennessee 


Average 
Acreage,      yield  per 
acre. 


Acres. 

22,783 
1,874  | 
7,706 
2,359 
3,350 
321, 552 

11, 598 

252,000 

1,331 

8,124 

18,078 

21,131 
5,603 

13,000 
4,315 
3,787 

52,000 

20,842 
4,538 
9,000 
1,501 
861 
1,348 
527 


Bush. 
28.0 
22.0 
21.0 
20.0 
17.0 
19.0 
18.0 
19.0 
17.0 
18.0 
19.0 
18.0 
14.0 
19.0 
16.0 
19.0 
13.0 
15.0 
14.0 
12.0 
18.0 
15.0 
17.0 
16.0 


Production. 


Bushels. 

637,924 
41, 228 

161, 826 

47,180 

56,950 

6. 109,  488 

208,  764 

4. 788, 000 

22,  627 

146,  232 

343,482 

380,358 
78,442 

247,000 
69,040 
71, 953 

676,000 

312,630 
63,532 

108,000 
27,018 
12,915 
22, 916 
8,432 


Average 
farm 
price 
Dee.  1 


Farm  value 
Dec.  1. 


Cents. 
59 
73 
58 
68 
75 
61 
60 
57 
61 
60 
58 
65 
64 
57 
64 
75 
55 
62 
54 
76 
74 
62 
74 
83 


Dollars. 

376, 375 
30,096 
93,859 
32,082 
42,712 
3, 726, 788 

125,258 

2,729,160 

13.802 

87,739 

199,220 

247, 233 
50,203 

140,790 
44,186 
53,965 

371,800 

193,  831 
34,307 
82,080 
19,993 
8,007 
16, 958 
6,999 


United  States. 


789.208 


18.6  '       14,641,937 


59. 6         8, 727, 443 


Average  yield  per  acre  of  buckwheat  in  the  United  States,  1897-1906,  by  States. 


State. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire . 

Vermont 

Massachusetts... 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia . . . 
North  Carolina.. 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota... 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Tennessee 

Oregon 


1897. 


General  average 20. 9 


Bush. 
35.0 
27.0 
24.0 
19.0 
17.0 
22.0 
16.0 
21.0 
19.0 
19.0 
14.0 
19.0 
11.0 
18.0 
14.0 
13.0 
17.0 
18.0 
17.0 
17.0 
15.0 


14.0 


18.0 
18.0 


1899.   !   1900. 


Bush. 
26.5 
20.0 
21.4 
20.0 
19.0 
16.8 
21.0 
17.2 
16.5 
12.2 
17.3 
20.5 
19.5 
20.0 
18.4 
14.0 
14.2 
15.5 
15.0 
16.0 
15.8 


12.8 


18.0 
14.0 


17.3 


Bush. 
22.0 
20.0 
23.0 
20.0 
19.0 
13.0 
21.0 
20.0 
18.0 
13.0 
14.0 
17.0 
17.0 
16.0 
16.0 
15.0 
11.0 
15.0 
17.0 
16.0 
14.0 


16.0 


12.0 
17.0 


Bush. 
30.0 
22.0 
25.0 
17.0 
16.0 
14.0 
16.0 
14.0 
13.0 
15.0 
13.0 
17.0 
13.0 
16.0 
14.0 
15.0 
14.0 
14.0 
15.0 
15.0 
13.0 


16.0 


14.0 
13.0 


16.6       15.0 


Bush. 
31.7 
21.0 
25.1 
18.9 
18.0 
18.8 
19.0 
19.5 
17.8 
17.5 
15.9 
20.6 
15.6 
16.1 
13.1 
11.0 
14.1 
12.4 
14.5 
13.5 

6.0 
11.5 
11.5 

7.9 
14.2 


1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

Bush. 

Bush. 

Bush. 

30.4 

29.8 

32.5 

20.0 

19.6 

25.1 

25.0 

24.0 

26.3 

14.4 

13.7 

16.2 

18.4 

17.5 

16.3 

17.7 

18.3 

18.8 

22.5 

18.1 

20.8 

18.1 

16.5 

18.8 

15.2 

15.2 

12.1 

17.0 

16.3 

18.2 

16.6 

18.6 

17.0 

22.5 

17.2 

19.1 

14.5 

12.1 

14.7 

13.9 

16.6 

16.9 

17.6 

16.8 

16.1 

15.5 

15.3 

17.9 

13.0 

15.5 

15.4 

16.0 

15.6 

17.7 

13.9 

15.2 

15.1 

16.0 

15.1 

14.8 

16.0 

14.8 

13.5 

10.0 

12.7 

13.5 

14.7 

19.0 

14.7 

12.0 

18.4 

14.0 

18.0 

14.7 

15.5 

1905. 


Bush. 
30.0 
23.0 
19.0 
20.0 
16.0 
19.0 
21.0 
20.0 
17.0 
19.0 
18.0 
19.0 
15.0 
17.0 
17.0 
16.0 
16.0 
15.0 
14.0 
13.0 
16.0 


1906. 


14.0 
11.0 
16.0 


Bush. 
28.0 
22.0 
21.0 
20.0 
17.0 
19.0 
18.0 
19.0 
17.0 
18.0 
19.0 
18.0 
14.0 
19.0 
16.0 
19.0 
13.0 
15.0 
14.0 
12.0 
18.0 


15.0 
17.0 
16.0 


18.1  I     17.7 


18.9 


19.2 


18.6 


584 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


tgevahupt  i  States,  based  upon  farm  ralue  December  1, 

U    7-1  Stmt*. 


189 


1904.   1905.   1906. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire . 
Vermont.. 

Massachu>  I 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  .Terser 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware . . . 

Maryland 

Yirginia 

Wesi  Virginia. . . 
North  Carolina . . 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

s  nsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

N  rtfaDftk  " 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Tennessee 




1 

9.40 

10.00 

M 

.  1   • 

.  . 

14.00 

11.97 

i  ' 

11.  34 

u  - 

10.80 

•   -. 

-" 

"   " 

"   ' 

I 

B 

• 

:.  :■ 

a 

9. 35 

9.44 

•    ■ 

i 

6.05 

. 

7.35 

•   M 

■ 

. 

-■ 

•   H 

11.44 

12.50 

.  M 

10.40 

"     I 
9.44 

9.52 

r     2» 

"" 

7.14 

•  . 

I 
-    " 


:-. 


::..-. 


■    . 


Si 


10.01 


11.55 
U   ■ 
11.53 
11.70 

i    n 

■■ 

10.92 

7.99 

■    . 

>  ? 

■ 

4.56 


::  y 

10.44 

14.40 

I 

r    N 

-' 
- 

6. 39 
9.44 
i     . 

::  ;•: 

- 

•  - 

-  - 


I 

:    ■■- 

■ 
"  • 

11.17 

i    a 

- 

13.11 
14.35 


."     i 
14.73 

11.47 

■ 
.     H 
"   I 

E 
:    s? 

-- 

.    ■ 

u  s 

U  M 

r     ■ 

U.  IS 

LOG 

- 

£ 

:;  ;- 

11.30 

::  :: 


.:  ,': 
9.69 
14.30 

::  '.» 

. 
:    . 

11.30 

9.69 

i 

■ 

-  if 

-  • 
I .  ::■ 

:;  :; 


General  average •   i 


*:  '- 

:•  r 

-  ! 
:.:  ••. 

.  ■■ 
11-59 

".  s 

1.  S 

■ 

:  > 

::  :•; 

:.  ■ 

•  i 

:  s. 

.  .4 

-  a 

■  u 

r  ■ 

■  i 

9.12 

:.  : 


v  -ember  1.  1897—1906t 

- 


51    - 

•   i 

>  • 

1899. 

:h:  . 

.-•  : 

.*.■-. 

yyy. 

-y> 

44 
55 
46 

S 

40 
49 
42 
36 

9 
50 
49 

49 

m 

49 
S3 

• 

• 

45 

49 

1 

m 

47 

46 

61 

'■- 

45 

H 

44 

40 

53 

B 

- 

-- 

51 

51 

52 

. 
40 
49 
■ 

■ 

Ocnis. 

44 

v 

a 
a 

■ 

54 
49 

I 

54 
" 
49 

■ 
■ 

a 

55 
63 
52 
58 

49 
52 
50 

a 

■ 

a 
a 
"" 
■ 

■• 

61 
E 

H 

- 

- 
69 

m 

55 

.■: 
•- 
" 
•• 
. 

60 

51 

\ 

1 
60 

• 

'r 

a 
■ 
- 

74 

n 

■ 

64 
61 
60 

. 
60 

• 

• 

a 

70 

• 

■ 

• 

59 

" 
• 

n 

59 

- 
- 

63 

■f 

■y 
■' 

: 

H 

53 

71 
"■ 
53 
69 

a 

■  - 

' 

-. 
-. 
•: 

■ 

63 
64 
JJ 

n 

72 
TO 

n 

61 

63 
60 

85 

• 

» 

71 

■ 

n 
■ 
n 

73 

' 
63 

• 

63 

. 

66 

. 
S 

• 
53 

' 

'" 

70 

■- 

63 
69 
68 

Qeatc 

■• 

.* 

75 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

60 

-.: 

•..: 

••• 

West  \  irginia 

a 

i 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

•- 
- 

. 

54 

Iowa 

-ri 

76 

51 

- 

1 

63 

"4 

Tennessee . . 

Oregon 

Z 

s 

> 

74 

g 

S3 

General  average 

£  1 

45.0 

".' 

s  ■ 

>•     J 

•..  • 

> 

s  . 

STATISTICS    OF    POTATOES.  585 

POTATOES. 

Potato  crop  of  countries  named.  1901-1905. 

[No  statistics  for  Switzerland,  Portugal,  Argentina,  Transvaal,  Egypt,  and  some  other  less  important 

potato-growing  countries.] 


Country. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

NORTH    AMERICA. 

Bushels. 
187,598,000  | 

Bushels. 
284,633,000 

Bushels. 
247,128,000 

Bushels. 
332,830,000 

Bushels. 

Canada: 

Ontario 

Manitoba 

New  Brunswick. 
Other" 


Total  Canada . 


Mexico 

Newfoundland  a . 


Total  North  America. 


SOUTH   AMERICA. 


Chile. 


EUROPE. 

Austria-Hungary: 

Austria 

Hungary  proper 

Croatia-Slavonia 

Bosnia-Herzegovina . 


18, 688, 000 
4,949,000 
4,206,000 

30,000,000 


57,843,000 


336,000 
1,350,000 


247,127,000 


10,000,000 


13,350,000 
3,568,000 
4,288.000 

30,000,000 


17,202,000 
4,907,000 
4,835,000 

30, 000, 000 


15,967,000  14,819,000 

3,919,000  4,910,000 

5,550.000  5,693.000 

30,000,000  30,000,000 


51,206.000  |      56,944,000         55,436,000 


55,422,000 


347,000 
1,350,000 


539,000 
1,350,000 


337,536,000       305,961,000 


11,616,000         10,349,000 


437,110,000  |  428,229,000 

158,494,000  '  141,538,000 

17,512,000  '  13,059,000 

2,893,000  I  1,793.000 


527,000 
1,350,000 


6  400,000 
1,350,000 


390,143,000 


517,913,000 


0,131,000 


6,532,000 


357.121,000  i  398,298.000 

165,386,096  j  110,402,000 

19,337,000  I  9,311,000 

2,322,000  2,450,000 


Total  Austria-Hungary. 


616.009.000  ,     584.619,000 


Belgium i    101 ,  082, 000 

Denmark 22, 002, 000 

Finland 16, 325, 000 

France 411, 055, 000 

Germany 1 .  788, 950, 000 


Italy  • 

Malta 

Netherlands. 

Norway 

Roumania... 


29.000.000 

264,000 

94,910.000 

24,320,000 

3,819,000 


83,198,000 

27,168,000 

15,298,000 

441,534,000 

1,596,969,000 

29,000,000 

361,000 

94,756,000 

17,735,000 

4,659.000 


544,166,000       520,461,000 


86, 580, 000 

25,256,000 

19,212,000 

450,262,000 

1,576,361,000 
29, 000. 000 

•         628, 000 

73,394,000 

22,851,000 

5,246,000 


91,632.000 

24,214,000 

15, 465, 000 

451,039,000 

1,333,326,000 

29,000,000 

733,000 

94,421,000 

17,253,000 

3,001,000 


581,822,000 

168,221,000 

6  15,000,000 

2,485,000 


767,528,000 


57,159,000 

29,953,000 

16,500,000 

6  438,000,000 

1,775,579,000 

29,000,000 

387,000 

87,043,000 

25,832,000 

3,733,000 


Russia: 

Russia  proper 

Poland 

Northern  Caucasia . 


566,926,000       723,435,000 

287,712,000  !     288.447.000 

10,801.000         16,154.000 


675,330.000  |  705,170,000  I  686,502,000 
194,829,000  :  179,997,000  I  331,529,000 
17,441,000  !        8,741,000  14,857.000 


Total  Russia  (European!.1    865,439,000   1,028,036.000!    887,600,000  1    893,908,000 


Servia . . 
Spain  6. 
Sweden. 


1.237,000 
84.000,000 
43.793.000 


1,402,000 
84,000.000 
51.377.000 


1,527,000  |  718,000 

84,000,000         84,000,000 
59,317,000         51,314,000 


United  Kingdom: 

Great  Britain 137, 060, 000  |     119. 250, 000 

Ireland ,    125,896,000  j     101,761,000 


108,779,000 
88,227,000 


133,961,000 
98, 635, 000 


Total  United  Kingdom...      262.956,000  j     221,011.000       197,006,000       232,596,000 


Total  Europe 4,365,161,000   4,281,123,000  |4, 062, 406, 000   3,843,081,000 


Japan 10, 153, 000 

Russia  (Asiatic) 14,273,000 


7.41S.000 
13,142,000 


9,824,000 
19,364,000 


11,274,000 
18,800,000 


Total  Asia. 


24.426.000  !       20.560.000  ;      29.188,000         30,074.000 


Algeria 1,673,000  i        1.851,000  1,596,000  1,655,000 

Cape  of  Good  Hope d  1.600, 000  |     dl, 600,000        dl. 600,000  I        1,942,000 

Natal 316,000  433,000  345,000  451,000 


Total  Africa  . 


3,589,000 


3,884,000 


3.541,000 


4,048,000 


1,032,8SS,000 


1,232,000 
84,000,000 
74,819,000 


140,474,000 
127, 793, 000 


268,267,000 


4,691,920  000 


6  10,000, 0(H) 
18,865,000 


28,865,000 


6  1,700,000 

02,000,000 

466,000 


4,166,000 


o  Estimated  from  returns  for  census  year. 
6  Average  production. 


c  Average,  1896-1900. 

d  Estimated  from  statistics  for  1899  and  1904. 


0S*:'  YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPABTMENT    OF    AGBICTTLT"CRE. 

Potato  crop  of  count™ *  named.  1901-1905 — Continued. 


1905. 


LU8KAUUU 

,.  L~--i-i.LL  L 

Victoria ... 

r-_:u:i  .-.  :-:r_.  u  .  .  . 
Western  Australia . 
I  -,  g —  --.-'  --. 


monveatth 


Ham  Beatond 

:     7i.   .-.-L=-.Ti..i.i:-:.  . 


flaafeeb. 

74?    0 

.       I     0 
5.397,00 

■--    0 

304     0 


9U» 

- 

562.000 

214.000 

i  .-.    0 


.i  ■ 

122.000 

i  H7  a 

e.mooo 
•-  o 

.-.   a 

105    •' 


'1  I 

659.000 

2.118.000 

262     0 

I   1".     0 
170.000 

•    0 


::•    ■■  :o:       i;  .r4   >:»:       :-:  :•:■■  :o        ::  -■:•-   >:• 


Bushels. 

718.000 

1.820.000 

-   7.000 

210.000 
4.127.000 


11,984    a 

a 

■     •• 

1:    '"    D 

11.071.000 

-  -.:  :•:•: 

-  nr  M 

7.7&r  •:>: 

r    HI    " 

5.025.000 

16.0%,  000 


irand  total 4.699.938,000  4,673,9"      0  .13.000   4.295.279.000     5. 0f». 492,000 


Acreage,  production,  value, prices, exports.  ttatoesofikt   "  --ales.  1866-1906. 


r- 

Chicago     price 

per 

- 

bushel  Burbank. 

1  :  \  .•-..: 

Imports 

valoe 
Dee.  1. 

during 

-' 

- 

Deoer 

May  of  fol- 
lowing 

fiscal 
vear  be- 

fiscal 
year  be- 

■ 

ginning 

ginning 

Julv  1. 

July  1. 

1 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

~s:\<~,>-         '.'::. 

DoOart. 

Butkels. 

Bushels. 

■     ',..;    :;;■      -    ,      ■ 

- 

■     ' 

::_  is 

■  .   ' 

■■-■_-- 

•J 

-  -  .  -■ 

378.605 

209,555 

1  ■■-.- .... 

i  "  i  ". 

_    .         M         f) 

. 

i 

-  j    -.-i    • 

II 

■-  -• 

•->    ;>,i 

75.336 

-      ■■-  r     -  -              ... 

" 

74    za    . 

-    1  •  1  • 

553. 070 

■  - 

' 

" 



621.537 

96.259 

_  -. '  :  "  :     ■  '  " 

.  12 

515,306 

■  - 

•    •_-  -  - .     .    . 

Klffj      i:' 

I  '     " 

i 

' 

■  -- 

:    22 
53 

609.642 

M 

]  \      -i   lies 

" 

-     ! 

-_            -    - 

827  00 

-"■    - 

77,31     '-. 
74   272 

'. 

" 

1      " 

744.409 

.  ■-■ 

:  "■  ■■<-      -  :- 

:.,  i.-    o 

••    " 

72     .     ■-- 

625.342 

:■"-. . . . 

:  '<    <y.     :■<;.& 

1-1    :-:  ±:< 

1 

'       - 

■ 

; 

•   L;^- 

.  "    "    •■ 

It 

.   . 

2. 170, 372 

. 

•    .  1.341 



408.286 

—          - .  - 

■  -       -     505 

■"   • 

439.443 

2.362,362 

. .    -  -     i    . 

:■:■■■  :-■,  ,.\ 

-..   . 



534,613 

425.408 

39.6 

•     .4.290 

380.868 

-  -  ■        i  ,- 

--   i 

"•   .'-5.403 

- 

33 

50 

494.948 

1,937.416 

.-                      --      r 

:-.■    ".   u 

-     ' 

44 



47 

' 

90 

434,864 

1,432.490 

.         "           .          '         - 

134.103,000 

.    3      74 

30 

S3 

65 

85 

403.880 

-      '           -■ 

-     . 

9  413.389 

30 

37 

24 

45 

471.955 

883,380 

2.647     ■        77.4 

•1.441 

*5.4 

72     1.934 

33 

43 

30 

60 

406. 618 

3. 415. 578 

.  J 

_    ' :    _  - 

I4i   J- 

"'    • 

112.  :4l    " 

82 

93 

93 

110 

341.189 

5.401.912 

"  i,-- 

_   714   73 

.'-     . 

•    ■ 

91.01.        - 

30 

40 

30 

50 

557.022 

.  ■-:     . 

•4  •:- 

-.520 

60 

72 

70 

98 

^45.720 

4.317.021 

.   ■  '  '  ■ 

4.303 

1.801 

51 

60 

64 

S> 

803.111 

3.002.578 

.  -  -    -. 

-     -.- 

53.6 

'.     783 

43 

58 

40 

70 

572.957 

1.341.533 

.' -  ..-■       1 

.'-"  .  "     " 

--    - 

73.984.901 

IS 

24 

10 

23 

BH    MB 

175.240 

"   i'J 

'  ■ '    "    _    -j. 

J-  ' 

72    182,350 

18 

26 

19 

26 

926.646 

246.178 

- 

'4  ' 

:  1.059 

30 

62 

60 

B 

605.187 

1.171.378 

...  ...      .. 

'  "-'.    .  <■ 

41.4 

.     .. 

30 

36 

33 

52 

53     ■ 

530.420 

s.a 

■       . 

35 

46 

27 

39 

155.861 

J  1 

■  '    -• 

4    : 

'      11.167 

40 

48 

35 

00 

741.483 

371,911 

"    J    " 

.  -       -       .          ;i" 

•    - 

14       "h.470 

IS 

82 

38 

100 

'.■    184 

7,656.162 

J  ■ 

"i" 

O  : 

134.111.436 

42 

48 

4. 

60 

843.075 

358.505 

•  u 

vs 

151.'-  • 

60 

66 

95 

116 

484,042 

3. 166, 581 

■  4^ 

■.  ;      .  r 

45.3 

13      -3.392 

32 

38 

20 

25 

23 

1S1.199 

'  'Ji  .' 

.....  --- 

■    " 

!■..:  -.1  .'s: 

55 

66 

4* 

73 

1.000.326 

.->•     .  .  .  . 

3.01-3,130  002.2 

::  1 

157.347.392 

40 

43 



STATISTICS    OF    POTATOES.  587 

Condition  of  the  potato  crop  of  the  United  States,  monthly,  1889-1906. 


Year. 

July. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

Oct. 

Year. 

July. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

Oct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

P.  ct. 

1889 

95. 1 

94.3 

81.7 

77.9 

1898 

95.5 

83.9 

77.7 

72. .") 

1890 

91.7 

77.4 

65.7 

61.7 

1899 

93.8 

93.0 

86.3 

81.7 

1891 

95. 3 

96.5 

94.8 

91.3 

1900 

91.3 

88.2 

80.0 

74.4 

1892 

90.0 

86.8 

74.8 

67.7 

1901 

87.4 

62.3 

52.2 

54.0 

1893 

94. 8 

86.0 

71.8 

71.2 

1902 

92.9 

94.8 

89.1 

82.5 

1S94 

92.3 

74.0 

62.4 

64.3 

1903 

88.1 

87.2 

84.3 

74. 6 

1895 

91.5 

89.7 

90.8 

87.4 

1904 

93.9 

94.1 

91.6 

89.5 

1896 

99.0 

94.8 

83.2 

81.7 

1905 

91.2 

87.2 

80.9 

74.3 

1897 

87.8 

1 

77.9 

66.7 

61.6 

1906 

91.5 

89.0 

85.3 

82.2 

Acreage,  production,  and  value  of  potatoes  in  the  United  States  in  1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire . 

Vermont 

Massachusetts. . 
Rhode  Island... 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania . . . 

Delaw'are 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia 

North  Carolina . . 
South  Carolina . . 

Georgia 

Florida 

Ohio 


Indiana . . . 

Illinois 

Michigan.. 
Wisconsin . 
Minnesota. 
Iowa. 


Missouri 

North  Dakota . . . 
South  Dakota. . . 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas 

Indian  Territory. 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 


United  States 3,013, 150 


Acreage. 

Average 

yield  per 

acre. 

Production. 

Average 
farm 
price 
Dec.  1. 

Farm  value 
Dec.  1. 

A cres. 

Bushels. 

Bushels. 

Cents. 

Dollars. 

109,516 

210 

22,998,360 

50 

11,499,180 

19.329 

112 

2, 164, 848 

60 

1, 298. 909 

26,300 

101 

2,656.300 

55 

1,460,965 

29, 149 

114 

3, 322, 986 

65 

2, 159, 941 

6,360 

108 

686,880 

80 

549,504 

31,931 

98 

3,129,238 

72 

2, 253, 051 

420.406 

105 

44, 142, 630 

49 

21, 629,  SS9 

67,353 

120 

8,0S2,360 

66 

5, 334, 35S 

253. ,97 

94 

23, S56, 918 

57 

13,598,443 

7,600 

97 

737,200 

59 

434,948 

28,75] 

93 

2,673,843 

56 

1,497,352 

55,656 

75 

4.174,200 

67 

2,796,714 

34, 376 

97 

3, 334, 472 

61 

2,034,028 

23,  SI2 

/O 

1, 785, 900 

74 

1,321,566 

9,065 

82 

743,  330 

105 

780,496 

8,627 

77 

664, 279 

110 

730, 707 

3,946 

85 

335,410 

110 

368,951 

157.072 

110 

17,277,920 

48 

8,293,402 

75,483 

89 

6, 717, 987 

57 

3,829.253 

150,638 

97 

14,611,886 

62 

9,059,369 

285,000 

95 

27,075,000 

34 

9,205,500 

245,000 

97 

23,765.000 

30 

7,129,500 

131. 7S2 

92 

12.123,944 

37 

4,485,850 

140,000 

95 

13.300.000 

43 

5,719,009 

85,228 

S4 

7, 159, 152 

57 

4,080,717 

25. 171 

98 

2, 466, 758 

46 

1, 134,  709 

35,422 

100 

3,542,200 

35 

1,239,770 

84,530 

87 

7,354,110 

52 

3,824,137 

85,000 

79 

6,715,000 

70 

4, 700, 500 

34, 736 

82 

2,848,352 

61 

1, 737, 495 

22,420 

80 

1, 793, 600 

62 

1,112.032 

9,258 

75 

694,350 

93 

645,746 

5,628 

85 

478,380 

87 

416, 191 

12.000 

62 

744,000 

75 

558,000 

31,097 

77 

2, 394, 469 

87 

2,083, 1SS 

12, 247 

76 

930, 772 

75 

698, 079 

10, 498 

85 

892,330 

80 

713, 864 

20,837 

80 

1,666,960 

67 

1,116,863 

14,099 

152 

2, 143, 048 

61 

1,307,259 

4,202 

115 

483,230 

65 

314, 100 

46,968 

125 

5,871,000 

45 

2,641,950 

1,426 

121 

172. 546 

90 

155,291 

11.987 

165 

1,977,855 

50 

988,928 

2,  974 

175 

520,450 

70 

364,315 

11.900 

175 

2.0S2.500 

41 

853,825 

34, 199 

129 

4,411.071 

56 

2, 470, 536 

40,083 

101 

4.04S.383 

56 

2,267,094 

50,291 

125 

6, 286, 375 

w 

4,651,918 

3,013,150 

102.2 

308,038,382 

51.1 

157.547,392 

5SS  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICrLTTTRE. 

■age  yield  per  acre  of  potatoes  in  the  United  States,  1897-1906.  by  States. 


State  or  territorv. 


1898.  |  1899.      1900.      190L      1902.      1903.      1904. 


1905.      1906. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire. 

Ht__ 

Massaehc- 

Rhode  Island 

ConnecticuT 

NevY    rk 

New  leraey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

laad 

rv.a 

.    -ia 

N   rth  Carolina... 
5     :-.'-  ■' :-:   -.':- .  . 





Ohio 

TnriiflTia 

]  

Michigan 

W:>:  raisin 

M-V'r>::i 

Iowa 

Mia-   ori 

North  Dakota 

Sonth  Dakota... 

MHffiiii 

Kins  u 

WmLuA] 

^T^-Ji-T 

AJal  una 

M -----   T      

L:  nuaaw 

Texa.5 

I-  :.  ■.:.  .    ~:    -;  . 

Oklahoma 

Arkansa  s 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

Near  Mersieo 

Utah 

id  a 

Mah~ 

zington 

Oregon 

C  afilonria 


59 
51 
70 
62 
110 
54 
62 

s 
s 

61 
56 

• 

65 
52 
75 
42 
31 
- 

13 
99 
106 
60 
-_ 
H 
94 
69 

4* 
O 

40 
55 
59 
64 
60 


150 
" 
90 
14- 
135 
140 

:■- 
:  ■: 


130 

>: 

105 
97 
123 

::»: 

73 

75 
54 
49 


J  ■..■•"- 
139 
127 
132 
134 
142 

w 

•- 

S3 
-" 
'- 
64 
66 
13 
57 
56 

m 

69 
71 
76 
96 
H 

103 
H 

100 
82 

103 

:• 

94 
95 
51 
44 
56 
61 
60 
64 


74  63 

MM         141 
120         125 


1  .  ■"• 
126 
101 
134 

" 

-4 

•> 

81 
B9 
58 

4* 
55 
:•» 
80 
61 
78 
'■« 
60 
76 
83 

n 

103 
81 

n 

93 
52 
73 
66 
72 
70 
54 
69 
H 
70 
62 


130 


:  . 

124 
144 
115 
119 


150 

.  > 
90 

77 

-: 

78 
59 


116 
110 
104 


2  ■_  ■  "" 
130 
120 
94 
109 

:-4 

-■: 

66 

:  . 


55 
60 
71 
52 

70 
64 
62 
54 
31 
35 

>: 

75 
'•? 
32 
17 
110 
45 
33 
-- 
35 
4 

67 
62 
60 
54 
63 
55 
4: 
157 
113 

50 
114 
141 

::•> 

117 
90 
101 


"■ 
80 
73 

96 
64 
69 

:•» 
90 

.-4 

101 
118 

-. 
115 

n 

:> 

105 

"4 

137 
138 

: 

50 
E9 
65 
66 
85 
97 
"- 
153 
MR 

:■:•: 
n 

157 
212 
149 
136 
103 
IIS 


Zhul 

196 
9S 

::■» 

H 
125 
96 

«> 

99 
91 

-4 
70 

>4 

80 
67 
81 
73 
82 

v- 

- 
n 

7! 

:■> 
64 
56 
K 

f4 
V- 
-4 
'• 
73 
- 

50 
67 
70 
78 
70 
176 
167 
145 

177 
117 
160 
145 
107 
130 


215 
135 

::- 

119 
137 
K 
93 
115 
106 
84 
99 

vi 

101 
78 
» 
70 

102 

93 

::.» 

121 
126 
102 
136 

96 
111 

*: 

::■: 
«•: 

83 
71 
61 

?: 

70 

n 

69 
85 
77 
143 
161 
159 
62 
137 
131 
139 
120 
S 
129 


I  -■' 
175 
120 

.-? 

n 

125 
92 
70 
93 
90 
93 
95 
84 

77 
83 
65 

75 
78 
80 

" . 
67 

-..«■ 

>- 

>: 

82 
95 
96 
93 

f- 
85 
80 
80 
110 
64 
64 
76 
"" 
65 
120 
170 
160 
75 
132 
120 
140 
142 
110 
165 


210 
112 
101 
114 
106 

105 

120 
94 
97 
93 

75 
97 

"" 

»: 

77 
85 

110 
»"■ 
■ 
95 
97 
92 
95 
S4 
■> 

100 
D 
! 

H 
80 
75 
-■ 

85 
80 
152 
115 
125 
121 
165 
175 
175 
129 
101 
125 


General  average 64.7;    752       8S.6  <    80.8       655      96.0       84.7     110.4;    87.0  |    102.2 

ft  value  of  potatoes  in  the  United  States,  based  upon  farm  value  December  1. :       - 

1906.  by  States. 


?tate  or  Territorv. 


1898.      1899.      1900. 


:-■:       :?-..] 


:  <■       : » 


Maine $52.51 

New  Hampshire 45.  ■ 

V-rrziiz: .'. -.-    •  44. :: 

V_--i  _z_  :>---; f.f   s  :'..  11 

Rhode  Island. 106.  7-: 

Connecticut 4>-60  55.00 

rk 41.54  30.66 

53.94 

.rakiia a.  St 

re 39.00  33.81 

Maryland 50.32  30.74 

Virginia 42.  70  37. 40 

Irginta 36.40  33.48 

North  Carolina 42.24  41.54 

Sonth  Carolina c&.  25  65.00 

Georgia 52.00  40.50 

Florida 90.00  76.80 

Ohio 26.04  25.01 

Indiana 19.22  29.11 

Illinois 23.56  32.20 


$58.38  $61.74  $100.50  $84.50  $109.76 

58.43 

53.53 

V    :- 

-.;  ■; 

a.  ■■:. 

53.60 

57.60 

54.52 

•.  -  • 

~-  ;.; 

:     14 

Es.a 

■••  : 

'.'     i. 

.---.14 

123.00 

102.50 

;-J     s 

67.16 

H   •■ 

■  a 

:      4: 

- 

-      4 

4-    V4 

42.33 

41.40 

50.15 

80.52 

'.«    .-. 

36.55 

30.74 

47.12 

47.31 

■■     i- 

26.52 

-•  > 

--   * 

4     -V 

47.04 

:-  ■-. 

29.70 

4"    _■ 

41.60 

42.00 

36.91 

34.22 

"-     ■- 

43.50 

53.76 

37. 44 

4-     >. 

44.20 

4*    - 

\  s: 

37.62 

i-   <- 

4-  :•> 

4-     S» 

4-  :- 

. 

--  •: 

77.00 

■'    -4 

i?  :? 

52.36 

67.84 

52-20 

-.-  -; 

-■'    5- 

-.;  -•: 

-     .i 

41.36 

103.32 

30.53 

a  4. 

45.90 

:•:    '.: 

;:  •:.« 

31.54 

27.90 

41.41 

50.16 

»  X 

37.72 

32.55 

49.56 

51.  S4 

75.60 

-.:  :- 

>4  4- 
104.12 
,  69.12 
50.22 
70.15 
57.24 
44.52 

:•:    --'r 


n  4: 

--  r.; 
>:  4- 

111.25 

-.:  ". 
4     • 

69.75 
5S.50 
-4.83 

55.10 
4"  I 
51.04 


■■.  :.: 


H06.9I 

67.20 

74.10 
V  4 
70.56 
51.45 
79.20 

52.08 
50.25 
59.17 
55.50 
86.10 
54-70 
93.50 
52.80 
50.73 
60.14 


STATISTICS    OF    POTATOES. 


589 


Average  value  of  potatoes  in  the  United  States,  based  upon  farm  value  December  1,  189r, 

1986,  by  States— Continued. 


State  or  Territory. 


Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota. . . 
South  Dakota... 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas 

Indian  Territory. 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

"Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 


1897. 


$30.96 
37.62 
32.86 
28.20 
26.46 
32.67 
30.08 
31.74 
26.40 
31.49 
29.20 
51.70 
48.38 
54.40 
57.00 


S21.33 
23.52 
21.25 
24.00 
29.04 
29.58 
20.16 
24.05 
35. 70 
29.44 
29.64 
61.42 
53.28 
58.50 
67.08 


$21.12 
26.78 
24.00 
23.00 
33.20 
27.81 
21.06 
23.50 
42.75 
31.11 
28.60 
48.72 
62.22 
48.60 
58.24 


46. 20 
62.40 
82.50 
54.32 
70.20 
44.40 
98.55 
44.80 
45.36 
64.00 
51.45 


40.70 
57.20 
78.00 
41.58 
45.24 
41.85 
139. 50 
64.80 
42.14 
40.42 
52.25 


44.73 
74.73 
76.25 
46.20 
33.32 
60.00 
91.80 
75.64 
72.00 
56. 35 
74.97 


General  average 35.37     31.11 


34.60 


S2.5. 22 
28.84 
24.30 
26.64 
32.55 
25.48 
26.28 
32.34 
34.56 
35.00 
31.32 
56.58 
54.78 
55.30 
54.56 


41.04 
71.02 
67.32 
45.92 
21.66 
56.64 
87.36 
63.92 
54.52 
49.50 
55.12 


$.55.08 
50.25 
45.56 
30.08 
18.02 
53.90 
38.25 
34.65 
27.04 
30.45 
39.56 
73.03 
71.30 
60.60 
67.50 
78.12 
69.30 
57. 96 
114.61 
112.40 
108. 00 
59.00 
68.40 
128. 31 
90.72 
71.37 
63.00 
77.77 


1902 


$29.52 
37.95 
30.38 
33.32 
44.80 
34.65 
32.56 
36.99 
62. 10 
42.40 
39.68 
46. 50 
63.48 
53.30 
56. 10 
54.40 
74.69 
48.96 
70.50 
65.27 
51.00 
58.32 
70. 65 

133.56 
55.13 
51.68 
56.65 
68.44 


19Q3 


$38.22 
33.64 
39.04 
42.00 
50.16 
40.32 
48.06 
41.60 
49.30 
49.64 
42.24 
64.32 
72.16 
45.50 
58.96 
60.20 
76.44 
55.30 
77.44 
95.19 
87.00 
73.08 
83.19 
81.90 
73.60 
52.20 
53.50 
85.  .SO 


$35.09 
35.28 
29.58 
38.08 
46.08 
35. 52 
28.80 
31.20 
44.80 
45.65 
44.02 
60.39 
09. 70 
63.70 
66.96 
51.75 
65.45 
57.75 
87.23 
99.82 
58.83 
48.36 
65.76 
85.15 
87.57 
67.20 
51.33 
86.43 


1905. 


1906. 


S37.52 
42.16 
41.00 
39.20 
45.10 
36.10 
36.48 
34.41 
55.89 
45.05 
46.40 
70.40 
93.50 
58.24 
59.52 
62.32 
67.76 
47.45 
70.80 
95.20 
91.20 
66.75 
56.76 
98.40 
67.20 
05.32 
66.00 

110.55  I 


S32.30 
29.10 
34.04 
40.85 
47.88 
45.08 
35.00 
45.24 
55.30 
50.02 
49.60 
69.75 
73.95 
46.50 
06. 99 
57.00 
08.00 
53. 00 
92.72 
74.75 
56. 25 

108.90 
82.50 

122. 50 
71.75 
72.24 
56.56 
92.50 


34.78  !     50.27     45.22       51.99       49.90 


53.07 


52.29 


Average  farm  price  of  potatoes  per  bushel  in  the    United  States,  December  1,  1897-1906, 

by  States. 


State  or  Territorv. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire. 

Vermont 

Massachusetts. . . 

Rhode  Island 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia. . . 
North  Carolina.. 
South  Carolina.. 

Georgia 

Florida 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota... 
South  Dakota... 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi , 

Louisiana 

Texas 

Indian  Territory. 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 


1897.   f   1898. 


.90 
.70 
.90 
.97 
.90 
.67 
.78 
.66 
.65 
.68 
.70 
.65 
.64 
1.05 
1.00 
1.20 
.62 
.62 
.62 
.43 
.38 
.31 
.47 
.63 
.33 
.32 
.46 
.55 
.67 
.73 
.94 
.82 
.85 
.95 


80.46 
.49 
.42 
.63 
.64 
.55 
.42 
.01 
.58 
.69 
.53 
.55 
.54 
.62 

1.00 
.75 

1.20 
.41 
.41 
.46 
.27 
.24 
.25 
.30 
.44 
.34 
.28 
.37 
.51 
.46 
.57 
.83 
.72 
.75 
.86 


IS!  19. 


1900. 


$0.42 
.46 
.36 
.57 
.50 
.46 
.40 
.51 
.43 
.51 
.51 
.56 
.52 
.66 

1.04 
.83 

1.24 
.43 
.43 
.41 
.32 
.26 
.25 
.23 
.40 
.27 
.27 
.25 
.45 
.61 
.65 
.87 

1.02 
.81 
.91 


SO.  49 
.53 
.40 
.66 
.70 
.70 
.45 
.60 
.53 
.60 
.54 
.59 
.51 
.65 

1.00 
.77 

1.00 
.40 
.38 
.41 
.26 
.28 
.30 
.37 
.35 
.49 
.36 
.49 
.48 
.50 
.58 
.82 
.83 
.79 


.55 
.55 


.71 
.53 


$0.67 

.79 

.64 

.90 

.93 

.94 

.71 

.85 

.76 

.78 

.77 

.74 

.85 

.72 

1.10 

1.06 

1.29 

.85 

.90 

.93 

.68 

.67 

.07 

.94 

1.00 

.49 

.85 

1.05 

1.04 

.87 

.86 

1.09 

1.15 

1.01 

1.25 

1.24 

1.26 

1.26 

.73 


$0.65 
.69 
.58 
.81 
.75 
.73 
.59 
.61 

.  .57 
.51 
.52 
.58 
.51 
.67 
.96 
.90 
1.22 
.44 
.41 
.42 
.41 
.33 
.31 
.34 
.35 
.33 
.44 
.27 
.45 
.53 
.64 
.93 
.92 
.82 
.85 
.64 
.77 
.68 
.50 


1904. 


$0.56 
.65 
.50 
.71 
.82 
.78 
.56 
.69 
.62 
.56 
.60 
.64 
.66 
.74 

1.04 
.94 

1.26 
.61 
.66  i 
.72 
.49 
.58 
.61 
.75 
.  70 
.48 
.54 


$0.48 
.56 
.47 
.71 
.76 
.72 
.54 
.61 
.54 
.53 
.51 
.55 
.54 
.70 
1.01 
1.07 
1.29 
.47 
.45 
.47 
.29 
.28 
.29 
.28 
.48 
.32 
.30 


1905.      1906. 


.65 

.26 

.85 

.56 

.68 

.55 

.64 

.62  , 

.96 

.99 

.88 

.85- 

.91 

.91 

.88 

.93  | 

.86 

.75 

.98 

.77 

.79 

.75 

.44 

.61 

$0.61 
.72 
.71 
.84 
.89 
.91 
.70 
.75 
.65 
.59 
.58 
.56 
.58 
.68 
1.03 
1.12 
1.20 
.63 
.56 
.67 
.56 
.62 
.50 
.49 
.55 
.38 
.38 
.37 
.69 
.53 
.58 
.88  | 
.85 
.91 
.93 
.82 
.88 
.73 
.59  I 


SO.  50 
.60 
.55 
.65 
.80 
.72 
.49 
.66 
.57 
.59 
.56 
.67 
.01 
.74 
1.05 
1.10 
1.10 
.48 
.57 
.62 
.34 
.30 
.37 
.43 
.57 
.46 
.35 
.52 
.70 
.61 
.62 
.93 
-87 
.75 
.87 
.75 
.80 
.67 
.61 


590 


YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMEXT    OF    AGRICTTLTrEE. 


Average  farm  price  of  potatoes  per  bushel  in  the  United  States.  Decembe  -1906, 

by  States — Continued. 


State  or  Territorv. 


1897.      1898.      1899.      1900. 


1901. 


1903. 


1904.      1905. 


~~~--.~.~z. .  . 
Colorado 

Mexico. 
Utah 

I  i 

Idaho 

Oregon 


tO.  55 
.56 
.78 
.30 
.73 
.32 
.28 
.40 
.49 


3eneu)  .-- r  .j . 


$0.65     SO  61     SO  6$     SI.  00     SO  61     SO  57     SO  62 


.54 
.78 
.31 
.90 
.54 
.39 
.47 


-J 


.90 


.51 


-  M 
SI 

"■: 
.  m 


4L4       39.0 


L14 

1.18 

!a 

18 

.60 

.45 

.56 

.91 

.63 

O 

.84 

.37 

.47 

.61 

.38 

.45 

.70 

.55 

.53 

"" 

.58 

43.1 

:■:. ' 

47.1 

.37 

n 

.65 
.63 


•' 

ML  66 

:: 

.45 

«V 

.90 

4 

.50 

. 

.70 

.41 

- 

.56 

GO 

.56 

" 

.74 

6L  4       45.  3 


6L7 


Wholesale  prices  of  potatoes  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States.  190-2-1906. 


;::-::zn_:. 


Chicagc 


Milwaukee. 


St.  Lonis. 


Date. 


-r       rr 


Bw    .-  -  . 

per  bushel. 


Per  bushel. 


Bui-bank, 
per  bushel. 


Low.      High.      Low. 


1902. 

$2.20 

2.10 

Mir   ~ 

2.10 

Vpr' 

2.  4-5 

Mav 

.   ." 

Tmi  i 

*>  10 

Julv 

.90 

Au;.:;: 

90 

SrTt-~'."    rl. 

95 

1.25 

- 

1. 50 

Decanter. 


January 

February.. 
March 

ArrL 

y.'r 

June 

July 

-     - 

October 

X:-e:_".    er. 

^  ■-:-:. .      : 


January 

-     '  -  -":"•  ■ 
March..*... 

April 



Tone 

July 

Auir:- 
Beptonter. 
October 

December.. 


:-•-.. 


lammy. . . 
Februarv.. 
March..*... 
April 

June 

July   

August 

October. . . 
November. 
Deeenl  er. 


1.65 
L50 
1.50 
1.35 
1.65 
1.50 
1.  75 

1.50 
1.20 
1.20 

:  - 


2.40 
2.60 
3.00 

aoo 

2.40 
2.40 
1.05 
1.35 
L35 

1.50 


:.  v 
1.60 
1.70 
L65 
1.90 

aoo 

2.25 
L95 

:  > 
:  v 

2.10 
2.10 


1.95 

2.70 

.3.75 

aso 

-  " 

2.00 
L50 
1.35 
1.20 
1.20 
1.20 


2.55 
2.85 

4    ;. 

ia 

4  s: 

4.50 

aoo 

:.  >: 

L65 
L50 
1.50 
1.35 


Per  bushel. 


"•* 
.35 
.2.5 

2-5 
.25 
.25 
.45 
.45 
.45 
.50 
.60 
.55 


-Ll 

.43 
.40 
.32 
.30 
.60 
.55 
.50 
.55 
.75 
.75 

.  -: 


Cents. 
70 


- 


95 
115 


::.-... 


Low.      High.      Low.      High 


80 

■ 

v 
100 
100 

60 


95 
91 
102 
:;•; 
Uf 
::- 


CemU. 

-. 
72 
70 
70 
50 
40 
30 
28 

:> 

30 

34 
35 


n 

:: 


Cents. 

-" 
85 
•• 
103 
103 
90 
85 
50 
40 
40 
43 
- 


Cents.     Cents. 


a 

30 
25 
26 

H 

'. 

•■ 
BS 

n 

•- 


78 

:• 

•  b 
SI 
90 


:•> 


83 
84 
90 
105 
105 

n 


41 

44 

50 

54 

51 

DO 

50 

55 

51 

54 

50 

53 

42 

54 

45 

63 

65 

125 

40 

65 

55 

n 

67 

so 

65 

68 

s5  69  73 

90  96 

95  94 

120  115  125 

105  115 

120    

»    

»    

52 
33  .  42  45 

30  36  43 

30  36$  45 


42 
50 
38 
40 
175 
70 
45 
48 
60 
73 
80 
66 


STATISTICS    OF    HAY. 


591 


Wholesale  prices  of  potatoes  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906 — Con. 


Cincinnati. 

Chicago. 

Milwaukee. 

St.  Louis. 

Date. 

Per  busbel. 

Burbank. 
per  bushel. 

Per  bushel. 

Burbank, 
per  bushel. 

Low. 

High. 

Low.     High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

1906. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

$0.55 

$0.65 

55 

66 

45 

58 

58 

82 

.45 

.62 

47 

57 

35 

50 

53 

61 

.45 

.75 

43 

68 

35 

62 

51 

70 

April 

.60 

.85 

57. 

63 

50 

62 

65 

68 

.     .55 

.75 

48 

73 

45 

75 

60 

88 

June 

.90 

1.05 

60 

87 

50 

80 

65 

125 

July 

August 

September 

.75 

.90 

40 

87 

35 

75 

.58 

.80 

35 

50 

37 

60 

.55 

.60 

45 

58 

35 

55 

43 

62 

October 

.50 

.60 

40 

47 

25 

40 

48 

.45 
.45 

.58 

.47 

41 

40 

48 
43 

25 
25 

40 
40 

45 

40 

55 

December 

46 

HAY. 

Acreage,  production,  value,  prices,  and  exports  of  hay  of  the  United  States,  1866-1906. 


Year. 


1866 
1867 
186S. 
1869 
1870 
1871 
1872. 
1873 
1874 
1875. 
1876. 
1877 
1878. 
1879 
1880 
1881 
1882. 
1883 
1884 
1885 
1886. 
1887 
1888. 
1889 
1890 
1891 
1892 
1893 
1894 
1895 
1896 
1897 
1898 
1899 
1900 
1901 
1902 
1903 
1904 
1905 
1906 


Acreage. 


Acres. 
17,668,904 
20,020,554 
21,541,573 
18,591,281 
19,861,805 
19,009,052 
20,318,936 
21,894,084 
21, 769, 772 
23,507,964 
25, 282, 797 
25,367,708 
26,931,300 
27,484,991 
25,863,955 
30,888,700 
32,339,585 
35,515,948 
38,571,593 
39,849,701 
36,501,688 
37,664,739 
38,591,903 
52,947,236 
50,712,513 
51,044,490 
50,853,061 
49,613,469 
48,321,272 
44,206,453 
43, 259, 756 
42, 426, 770 
42,780,827 
41,328,462 
39,132,890 
39,390,508 
39,825,227 
39,933,759 
39,998,602 
39,361,960 
42,476,224 


yield 
per 
acre. 


Tons. 
1.23 
1.31 
1.21 
1.42 
1.23 
1.17 
1.17 
1.15 
1.15 
1.19 
1.22 
1.25 
1.47 
1.29 
1.23 
1.14 
1.18 
1.32 
1.26 
1.12 
1.15 
1.10 
1.21 
1.26 
1.19 
1.19 
1.18 
1.33 
1.14 
1.06 
1.37 
1.43 
1.55 
1.35 
1.28 
1.28 
1.50 
1.54 
1.52 
1.54 
1.35 


Production. 


Aver- 
age, 
farm 
price 
per 
ton 
Dec.  1. 


Tons. 

21 

77s 

627 

26 

277 

000 

26 

141 

900 

26, 

420 

000 

24 

525 

000 

22 

239 

400 

23 

812 

800 

25 

085 

100 

25 

133 

900 

27 

*73 

600 

30 

867 

100 

31 

629 

300 

39 

608 

296 

35 

49.; 

000 

31 

925 

233 

35 

135 

064 

38 

138 

049 

46 

864 

009 

48 

470 

460 

44 

731 

550 

41 

796 

499 

41 

454 

458 

46 

643 

094 

66 

829 

612 

60 

197 

589 

60 

M7 

771 

59 

S23 

735 

65 

766 

158 

54 

874 

408 

47 

078 

541 

59 

282 

1.58 

GO 

664 

876 

66 

376 

920 

56 

65o 

756 

so 

110 

906 

so 

59(1 

877 

59 

S57 

576 

61 

305 

940 

60 

696 

028 

60 

531 

611 

57 

145 

959 

Dolls. 
10.14 
10.21 
10.08 
10.18 
12.47 
14.30 
12.94 
12.53 
11.94 
10.78 
8.97 
8.37 
7.20 
9.32 
11.65 
11.82 
9.70 
8.19 
8.17 
8.71 
8.46 
9.97 
8.76 
7.04 
7.87 
8.12 
8.20 
8.68 
8.54 
8.35 
6.55 
6.62 
6.00 
7.27 
8.89 
10.01 
9.06 
9.08 
8.72 
8.52 
10.37 


Farm  value 
Dee.  1. 


Dollars. 
220,835,771 
,300 
.589 
.  933 
.743 
,939 
,024 
,241 
,222 
,377 
,991 
79 
,015 
,S04 
,811 
,131 
,170 
,834 
,139 
.  752 
.437 
,  440 
,499 
,374 
,569 
,113 
,427 
,8s2 
,678 
,  185 
,145 
,390 
,  060 
,  926 
,53$ 
,191 
.  036 
.376 
,107 
,959 
,539 


268 

263 

268 

305 
317 
308 
314 
300 
300 
27., 
26,4 
285 
330 
371 
415 
371 
383 
396 
389 
363 
413 
408 
470 
473 
494 
490 
570 
468 
393 
388 
401 
398 
411 
445 
506 
542 
551  i 

515 
592 


Chicago  prices  No.  1  timo- 
thy per  ton,  by  carload  lots.    Domestic 
exports, 
fiscal 


December. 


Low.  !  High. 


May  of  follow- 
ing year. 


Low.    High. 


Dolls.    Dolls.  '  Dolls.    Dolls. 


year  be- 
ginning 
July  1. 


9.50 

8.00 

14.00 

15.00 

16.00 

11.50 

9.00 

10.00 

11.00 

9.50 

13.50 

11.00 

9.00 

9.00 

12.50 

11.00 

10.00 

10.00 

12.00 

8.00 

8.00 

8.00 

10.50 

11.50 

13.00 

12.00 

10.00 

10.50 

10.00 

15.50 


10.50 
8.50 
14.50 
15.50 
16.50 
12.25 
10.00 
11.50 
12.00 
10.50 
14.50 
11.50 
10.00 
10.50 
15.00 
11.50 
10.50 
11.00 
12.50 
8.50 
8.50 
8.25 
11.50 
14.00 
13.50 
12.50 
12.00 
11.50 
12.00 
18.00 


9.00 

9.75 

9.00 

14.00 

17.00 

15.00 

12.00 

12.50 

15.50 

10.00 

11.00 

17.00 

10.50 

9.00 

12.50 

13.50 

12.00 

10.00 

10.00 

11.50 

8.50 

9.50 

9.50 

10.50 

12.50 

12.50 

13.50 

12.00 

11.00 

11.50 


10.00 
10.75 
11.50 
15.00 
19.00 
16.50 
13.00 
17.00 
17.50 
12.00 
12.50 
21.00 
11.00 
14.00 
15.50 
14.00 
13.50 
10.50 
10.25 
12.00 
9.00 
10.50 
10.50 
12.50 
13.50 
13.50 
15.00 
15.00 
12.00 
12.50 


Tons. 
5,028 
5,645 


6,723 

4,581 

5,266 

4,  557 

4,889 

7,183 

7,528 

7,287 

9,514 

8,127 

13,  739 

12,  662 

10,  570 

-13, 309 

16,908 

11,142 

13,390 

13, 873 

18,198 

21,928 

36,274 

28,066 

35,201 

33,084 

54,446 

47, 117 

59,052 

61,658 

81,827 

64,916 

72, 716 

89,364 

153,431 

50,970 

60,730 

66,557 

70, 172 


592 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Acreage .  production,  and  value  of  hay  in  the  United  States  in  1906.  by  States. 


Average 

Average 

Farm 

Stat*  or  Territory. 

Acreage. 

yield 
per  acre. 

Production. 

price 
Dec.  1. 

value 
Dec.  1. 

Ac 

Ton*. 

Ton*. 

Dollars. 

Dollars. 

Maine 

1.329.835 

1.20 

1.595.802 

10.25 

16.356.970 

New  H  ampshire 

625.725 

1.15 

719.584 

12.50 

8.994.800 

--"1.530 
582.832 

1.20 
1.31 

1.044.636 
763. 510 

10.00 
17.00 

10.446.360 

MassaohusetT  n 

12.979.670 

61.980 
489.599 

1.06 
1.17 

65.699 
572. 831 

17.40 
15.00 

1.143.163 

Oomvctanrt 

8.592.465 

4.717.641 
424.525 

1.28 
1.32 

6.038,580 
560.373 

12.10 
15.95 

73.066.818 

New  Jersev 

8,937.949 

3.072.021 
74.03$ 

1.30 
1.25 

3.993.627 
92.548 

13.40 
15.00 

53.514.602 



1,388,  222 

Maryland 

->   :*:-: 

1.26 

353.167 

13.50 

4.7i.,7.7.54 

Virginia 

*23  _" 

1.25 

534,066 

15.50 

^.:'7$.023 

•  irginia 

517.384 

1.40 

724.338 

14.00 

10.140.732 

North  Carolina 

125.633 
60,682 
88.054 

1.54 
1.46 
1.65 

193. 475 
8$.  596 
145,289 

15.00 
15.25 
15.  75 

2.902.125 

1.351.089 

Georgia 

2. 28$.  302 

Florida 

20,000 

1.50 

30.000 

15.00 

450.000 

Ohio 

2.850,000 

1.22 

3.477.000 

12.00 

41.724.000 

Indiana 

2.375.000 

1.10 

2,612,500 

12.50 

32.656.250 

Illinois 

2. 638 

.98 

2. 585. 274 

12.50 

32.315.925 

Michigan 

2.650,000 

1.28 

3.392.000 

10.35 

35.107.200 

■ft  isconsin 

2.300.000 

1.35 

3.105.A00 

9.00 

27.945.000 

858.465 
3.500.000 

1.70 
1.35 

1.459,390 
4.725,000 

5.50 
7.00 

&.'"- 

33,075.000 

2. 728. 349 
177.368 
221.422 
1.350.000 
1.724.154 
447.202 
339.446 

.78 
1.45 
1.50 
1.40 
1.28 
1.35 
1.51 

2. 128, 112 
257, 184 
332.133 
1.890,000 
2.206.917 
603.723 
512. 563 

10.00 
4.50 
4.50 

.     5.60 
6.25 
13.25 
13.  4.5 

21.281.120 

1.157.328 

1.494.598 

10.584. 000 

13. 793. 231 

7.999.330 

Tennessee 

6.893.972 

Alabama 

56.350 

1.95 

109.882 

13.30 

1.461.431 

Mississippi 

43.873 

1.90 

83.359 

11.4-5 

954. 461 

T/om'siana   

21,488 

1.93 

41.472 

11.50 

476.928 

Texas 

379.836 

1.80 

683,705 

8.50 

5.811.492 

46.140 
298.969 

1.40 

1.40 

64.596 

5.50 

5.  75 

355, 278 

OVIahoma 

2.  40*i.  703 

Arkansas 

70.932 

1.60 

113.491 

9.9t 

1.12.3.561 

Montana 

373.827 

1.85 

691.580 

8.90 

6.155.062 

W  voming 

188.327 

2.25 

423.736 

I  .  <o 

3.283.954 

Colorado 

ESS  -:: 

2.50 

1,596.542 

9.50 

15.167.149 

New  Mexico 

76. 714 

2.50 

191.785 

10.75 

2.",:. '.$9 

63,685 
351.272 

3.50 
4.00 

222,898 
1.405.088 

12.00 
7.50 

2. 674. 776 

Ttah 

10,538.160 

Nevada 

170. 175 

1.50 

255.262 

8.00 

2,042.096 

Idaho 

413.064 

2.95 

1.218.539 

8.00 

9. 748. 312 

Washingt  on 

348.830 

2.38 

830.215 

11.00 

9.132,365 

1 )regon 

393. 977 

2.18 

858.870 

7.85 

6. 742. 130 

612.684 

1.85 

1.133.465 

11.25 

12.751.481 

United  States 

42.  476. 224 

1.35 

57.145.9.59 

10.37 

592.539.671 

Average  yield  per  acre  of  hay  in  the   United  States.  1897—1906,  by  States. 


Stat*  or  Territory. 

1897. 

1898. 

1899. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

190«. 

Maine 

New  Hampshire 

1  Ton*. 

1    1.10 
1.15 
1.30 

Ton*. 
1.20 
1.25 
1.45 
1.42 
1.18 
1.31 
1.40 
1.42 
1.45 
1.38 
1.20 
1.32 
1.  54 
1.70 
L60 
1.75 
1.60 

Ton*. 
0.90 

.89 
1.14 
1.13 

.89 

.94 
1.04 

.83 
1.20 
1.04 
1.13 
1.10 
:  . 
1.50 
1.22 
1.45 
1.46 

Ton*. 

0.90 

.87 

1.24 

.97 

.92 

.89 

.81 

1.26 

1.10 

.98 

1.09 

1.16 

1.1$ 

1.41 

1.32 

1.69 

1.20 

Ton*. 
1.05 
1.28 
1.36 
1.21 
.92 
1.01 
1.30 
1.32 
1.19 
1.12 
1.  22 
L20 
1.37 
1.66 
1.46 
1.46 
1.48 

Ton':. 
1.07 
1.06 
1.27 
1.60 
1.03 
L35 
1.34 
1.22 
1.19 
1.09 
1.01 

1.12 
1.44 
1.22 
1.36 

1.24 

Ton*. 
0.98 
.92 
1.18 
1.36 
1.07 
1.11 
1.26 
1.28 
1.27 
1.64 
1.24 
1.30 
1.3$ 
1.60 
1.46 
1.53 
1.47 

Ton*. 
1.10 
1.02 
1.25 
1.23 
1.16 
1.06 
1.36 
1.39 
1.45 
1.59 
1.36 
1.39 
1.47 
1.72 
1.53 
1.52 
1.36 

Ton*. 
1.08 
1.16 
1.35 
1.33 
1.09 
1.12 
1.30 
1.13 
1.50 
1.55 
1.30 
1.30 
1.48 
1.60 
1.42 
1.50 
1.48 

Ton*. 
1.20 
1.15 
1.20 

1.40 

1.31 

Rhode  Island 

Connecticut 

1.15 

1.20 

..      1.35 

1.06 

1.17 
1.28 

New  Jersev 

Pennsvlvania 

1.75 
1.40 
L3S 

1.32 
1.30 
1.25 

Maryland 

\  lrginia 

.rginia 

1.35 
1.08 
1.35 
1.25 

1.26 
1.23 
1.40 
LSI 

1.00 

1.46 



Florida 

1.35 
..      1.00 

1.65 
1.50 

STATISTICS    OF    HAY.  59S" 

Average  yield  per  acre  of  hay  in  the  United  States,  1S97-1906,  by  States — Continued. 


State  or  Territory. 


Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota. . . 
South  Dakota . . . 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas 

Indian  Territory . 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Arizona 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 


1897. 


Tons, 
1.44 
1.43 
1.  29 
1.49 
1.35 
1.57 
1.50 
1.15 
1.60 
1.25 
1.60 
1.30 
1.17 
1.45 
1.45 
1.48 
1.90 
1.40 


General  average. 


1.S0 
1.50 
1.65 
2.25 
3.50 
3.00 
2.95 
2.50 
2.30 
2.25 
1.90 
1.60 


1.43 


Tons. 
1.39 
1.45 
1.56 
1.36 
1.50 
1.80 
1.75 
1.  CO 
1.50 
1.38 
1.60 
1.46 
1.45 
1.50 
1.90 
1.90 
2.10 
1.50 


1.54 
1.  45 
1.96 
2.20 
3.75 
3.50 
3.25 
2.60 
3. 75 
1.75 
1.90 
1.C0 


1. 55 


1899. 


Tons. 
1.30 
1.34 
1.29 
1.22 
1.47 
1.70 
1.34 
1.37 
1.58 
1.43 
1.66 
1.57 
1.29 
1.31 
1.66 
1.44 
1.95 
1.43 


1.48 
1.42 
1.47 
2.10 
1.70 
2.63 
2.50 
1.87 
2.50 
2.02 
1.97 
1.63 


1.35 


1900. 


1'ons. 
1.06 
1.21 
1.27 
1.29 
1.15 
1.16 
1.42 
1.29 
.92 
1.18 
1.3S 
1.32 
1.40 
1.40 
1.85 
1.75 
2.00 
1.80 


1.63 
1.60 
1.68 
2.23 
2.06 
2.31 
2.65 
2.43 
2.80 
2.16 
2.35 
1.51 


1.2S 


1901.      1902. 


Tons. 
1.36 
1.27 
1.08 
1.26 
1.29 
1.55 
1.25 

.75 
1.60 
1.15 
1.25 

.91 
1.34 
1.52 
1.75 
1.69 
1.85 
1.25 
1.46 

.96 
1.10 
1.79 
1.76 
2.08 
2.31 
2.85 
2.45 
2.50 
2.58 
2.30 
2.07 
1.82 


Tons. 
1.43 
1.46 
1.50 
1.45 
1.90 
1.76 

,  1.68 
1.59 
1.66 
1.23 
1.74 
1.70 
1.44 
1.44 
1.50 
1.40 
1.80 
1.40 
1.32 
1.26 
1.60 
1.68 
1.65 
1.92 
2.40 
2.34 
2.62 
2.91 
2.  67 
2.29 
2.04 
1.81 


1.28  !     1.50 


Tens. 
1.42- 
1.47 
1.54 
1.37 
1.S9 
1.84 
1.78 
1.57 
1.18 
1.45 
1.6S 
1.58 
1.46 
1.58 

.1.77 
1.74 
2.04 
1.84 
1.50 
1.34 
1.60 
2.08 
2.14 
2.56 
2.36 
3.46 
2.95 
3.12 
2.82 
2.41 
2.07 
2.08 


1.54 


1904. 


Ten*. 
1.43 
1.37 
1.36 
1.25 
1.67 
1.74 
1.62 
1.47 
1.57 
1.43 
1.76 
1.67 
1.44 
1.66 
1.71 
1.72 
2.06 
1.77 
1.49 
1.51 
1.72 
1.92 
2.27 
1.85 
2.58 
2.71 
3.54 
3.04 
3.07 
2.18 
2.04 
2.03 


1.52 


1905. 


Tons. 
1.49 
1.48 
1.35 
■1.46 
1.80 
1.75 
1.70 
1.10 
1.55 
1.60 
1.75 
1.55 
1.30 
1.60 
1.90 
1.75 
2.30 
1.90 
1.27 
1.43 
1.75 
1.60 
2.50 
2.65 

-2.70 
3.75 
3.25 
2.50 
3.10 
2.65 
2.30 
2.40 


1.54 


Tons. 
\.1f- 
1.10 

.98  . 
1.28 
1.35 
1.70- 
1.35 

.78- 
1.45 
1.50 
1.40 
1.28 
1.35-- 
1.51 
1.95 
1.60 
1.93 
1.80 
1.4CX- 
1.40 
1.60- 
1.85 
2.25 
2.50. 
2.50 
3.50 
4.00- 
1.50 
2.  95 
2,38 
2.18 
1.85 


1.35 


Average  value  per  acre  of  hay  in  the  United  States,  based  upon  farm   value  December  J, 

1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire. 

Vermont 

Massachusetts. . 

Rhode  Island 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia 

North  Carolina . . 
South  Carolina . . 

Georgia 

Florida 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 


Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota... 
South  Dakota... 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama. . . : 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas 

Indian  Territory 


1S9S. 


$9.12 
11.56 
9.21 
17.  IS 
14. 93 
14.61 
8.05 
13.  63 
11.46 
11.66 
11.16 
11.22 
12.94 
15.81. 
15.20 
20.  56 
22.56 
7.99 
8.12 
9.20 
9.72 
S.62 

i;.  or. 

7.09 
9.28 
4.87 
4.14 
5.28 
4.74 
13.19 
14.25 
17.  57 
15.96 
19.74 
8.77 


vm. 


S9.09 
10.  40 
10.55 
17.52 
15.  35 
13.  63 
10.87 
12.  74 
13.80 
12. 12 
13.73 
11. 27 
12.  19 
15.  15 

12.  50 
19.07 
22.  41 
11.63 
10.45 
10.00 
10.37 
10.07 

7.40 
7.10 
8.50 
5.21 
4.43 
6.14 
5.49 
13.42 
14.74 
lx.  92 

13.  32 
18.92 
10.15 


S11.60 
13.48 
13.70 
10.88 
17.20 
14.  89 
11.38 
20.22 
15.29 
13.67 
15.31 
15.43 
15.81 
15.79 
15. 18 
21.  55 
16.  44 
11.71 
11.80 
10.67 
12.19 
11.10 
8.06 
9.66 
8.97 
5.20 
4.66 
7.11 
6.01 
15.89 
16.52 
19.  52 
17.41 
18.80 
12.24 


$10.  90 

S10.  74 

15.87 

14.36 

13.  30 

12.26 

21.10 

26.  64 

17.54 

19.46 

14.77 

21.19 

13.75 

14.11 

18.86 

19.08 

15.90 

16.66 

13.84 

15.73 

16.07 

14.19 

14.41 

14.39 

18.91 

10. 05 

17.93 

17.64 

16.03 

13.72 

20. 92 

18.22 

22.  72 

19.02 

11.86 

14.59 

11.79 

12.  60 

12.  10 

13.31 

10.85 

12.03 

13.58 

15.03 

8.65 

9.43 

9.59 

10.92 

8.99 

10.90 

.5.84 

6.09 

5.16 

5.10 

7.71 

7.59 

7.25 

7.33 

10.25 

16.27 

18.71 

16.99 

21.12 

17.42 

17.62 

14.35 

20.50 

21.10 

13.  27 

12.04 

11.01 

6.57 

1902.  i   1903. 


S10.00 
12.  20 
12.84 

22.  74 
20.28 
10.  80 
13.81 
19.70 
17. 15 
24.32 
17.38 
17.85 
19.04 
21.47 
17.11 

23.  IS 
27. 67 
14.20 
12.  58 
12.83 
12.23 
14.17 
12.16 

9.72 

10.49 

5.48 

6.71 

7.53 

7.60 

17.62 

19.42 

21.93 

20.18 

23.15 

15.09 

8.  SO 


1905. 


$10.  09 

13.76 

11.85 

19.38 

20. 10 

15.78 

14.20 

20.39 

17.14 

22.09 

If..  97 

17.44 

18.  24 

25.04 

18.64 

23.01 

22.67 

13.  23 

11.7.5 

11.78 

11.36 

13. 18 

9.59 

8.68 

9.73 

6.61 

6.06 

6.72 

7.31 

16.57 

19.94 

20.  74 

18.66 

25.13 

14.37 

6.88 


15.08 
12.73 
20.24 
17.73 
16.35 
13.49 
16.74 
17.90 
21.19 
15.50 
16.41 
17.24 
20.48 
IS.  97 

23.  63 

24.  05 
11.92 
11.16 
11.16 
11.24 
13.05 
10.15 

8.67 

8.62 

6.71 

6.43 

7.24 

7.87 

13.82 

18.43 

23.79 

19.55 

26.45 

15.  43 

6.79 


1900. 


S12.  30 
14.38 
12.  00 
22.27 
18.44 
17.55 
15.49 
21.05 

17.  42 

18.  75 
17.01 

19.  37 

19.  60 
23. 10 
22.  27 
25^99 
22.50 
14.64 
13.75 
12.25 
13.25 
12.15 

9.35 
9.45 
7.  SO 
6.  52 
6.  75 
7.84 
8.00 
17.89 

20.  31 
25.93 

21.  76 

22.  20 
15!  30 

7.70  . 


A1906- 


-38 


594 


YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Average  value  per  acre  of  hay  in  the    United  States,  based  upon  farm   value  December  1, 
1897-1906,  by  States— Continued. 


State  or  Territory. 

1S9  7. 

1S98. 

1S99. 

1900. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1906. 

$6.59 
12.  89 

14.(0 
12.  64 
18.80 

20.16 
20.70 
19.80 
15.25 
19.60 
14.82 
14.41 

$6.68 
15.04 
12.67 
12.01 
IS.  99 
26.83 

19.18 
29.73 
14.69 
20.  45 
15.  26 
17.03 

1 

15.17 
18.  32 
14.27 
19.15 

26.24 
35.78 
20.18 
31.11 
19.64 
30.78 
21.07 
24.25 

$7.40 
16.89 
16.70 
13.05 
12.41 
29.46 
40.22 
22.  34 
23.10 
18.67 
24.72 
20.77 
21.13 

$7.03 
16.80 
12.32 
15.52 
21.73 
29.03 
46.39 
21.68 
21.25 
18.29 
25.63 
17.80 
24.12 

$8  05 

SI  1.25 

11.  63 
9.90 

12.  38 
24.50 
15.00 
14.01 
12.50 
12.  OS 
20. 25 
14.  73 
14.40 

$10. 39 
9.S6 
11.40 
11.88 

42.00 
14.  62 

ia  20 

18.37 
13. 30 
13.  78 
22.  SO 

812.80 
10.93 
9.70 
15.  43 
1  g.  02 
27.  22 
17.  75 
14.31 
15.  75 
17.98 
13.49 
13. 04 

SI  1.43 
13. 92 
12.  26 
16.95 
20.39 
20.10 
21.07 
18.71 
18.20 
20.52 

12.31 

15  84 

16  46 

17  44 

23.75 
26.88 
42.00 
20.00 
12  00 

Utah 

93  60 

26  18 

17.11 
°0  81 

9.46 

9.30 

9.97 

11.39 

12.  S5 

13.61 

13.93 

13.23 

13.11 

13.95 

Average  farm  price  of  hay  per  ton  in  the  United  States  December  1,  1897-1906,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


1S00. 


1901. 


1903. 


1904. 


1905. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire. 

Vermont 

.  ohusetts. . . 

Rhode  Island 

Connecticut 

New  -York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

"West  Virginia 

North  Carolina.. 
South  Carolina.. 

Georgia 

Florida , 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

nana 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

;  ri 

North  Dakota 

South  Dakota 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi , 

.Louisiana 

Texas 

Indian  Territory. 

Oklahoma '... 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Arizona 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

"Washington 

Oregon 

California 


11.50 
9.25 
13.90 
14.50 
13.00 
8.25 
10.75 
9.15 
10.00 
10.50 
10.  25 

9.75 
11.50 
13.00 
14.25 

6.25 
5.90 
6.  15 
,  75 
6.25 
4.50 
4.25 
6.15 
3.25 
2.95 
3.00 
3.40 
10.00 
10.75 
10.  25 
9.50 
8.75 
7.25 


$7.60 
9.  25 
6.35 
12.10 
12.65 
11.15 
5.75 
9.60 
7.90 
8.45 
9.30 
8.50 
8.40 
9.30 
9.50 
11.75 
14.10 
5.  1 5 
5.60 
5.90 
7.15 
5.  75 
3.70 
4.05 
5.80 
3.25 
3.00 
3.30 
3.25 
9.10 
9.50 
9.25 
8.40 
9.40 
5.S5 


S10. 10 
11.75 
9.25 
15.50 
17.  25 
14.50 
10.45 
15.35 
11.50 
11.65 
12.15 
10.  25 
9.45 
10.10 
10.30 
13.15 
15.  35 
S.95 
7.80 
7.75 
8.50 
6.85 
4.35 
5.30 
6.25 
3.30 
3.10 
3.70 
3.50 
10.40 
11.25 
11.40 
9.25 
9.70 
7.10 


512.95 

15.50 

11.05 

17.40 

18.70 

16.73 

14.05 

16.05 

13.90 

13.95 

14.05 

13.30 

13.40 

11.20 

11.50 

12.75 

13.70 

11.05 

9.75 

8.40 

9.45 

9.65 

6.95 

6.80 

6.95 

5.65 

3.95 

5.15 

4.55 

11.35 

11.80 

10.  55 

9.95 

9.40 

6.80 


8.65 
7.  7.". 
6.00 
5.50 
7.00 
5.00 
4.  75 
5.00 
5.25 
9.00 
7.  75 
9.00 


n 

6.80 
5.90 
5.40 
7.35 
12.00 
4.50 
7.00 
4.90 
7.60 


8.65 
7.70 
6.60 
7.35 
10.60 
10.35 
7.10 
7.65 
6.30 
8.90 
6.85 
8.00 


8.85 
8  70 
7.30 
7.60 
9.90 
11.30 
7.95 
7.70 
6.50 
9.50 
6.80 
8.15 


$10.44 
12.40 
9.82 
17.49 
19.06 
14.  (.2 
10.58 
14.29 
13.64 
12.  30 
13.17 
12.01 
13.80 
10.80 
10.98 

14.  33 

15.  35 
8.72 
9.28 

11.20 
8.61 
10.53 
5.58 
7.67 
11.99 
3.65 
4.49 
6.17 
7.97 
12.13 
12.  31 
12.07 
10.51 
11.08 
10.62 
7.54 
6.86 
11.72 
8.18 
7.18 
9.04 
10.34 
9.  IS 
8.45 
7.92 
5.91 
8.52 
7.16 
7.92 


$10.04 
13.55 
9.65 
10.  05 
18.89 
15.70 
10.53 
15.64 
14.00 
14.43 
14.05 
13.58 
14.33 
12.25 
11.25 
13.40 
15.34 
10.20 
8.67 
8.87 
8.30 
7.91 
5.36 
6.50 
6.89 
3.67 
4.15 
4.36 
4.31 
11.30 
11.80 
11.61 
10.25 
11.72 
8.60 
4.  98 
5.30 
9.40 
7.54 
7.2S 
9.89 
11.18 
12. 23 
7.32 
9.05 
5.50 
8.93 
7.48 
9.41 


$10. 20 

13.26 

10.88 

16.72 

18.95 

15.19 

10.96 

15.39 

13.50 

14.  S3 

14.02 

13.73 

13.80 

13.  42 

11.72 

15.15 

18.82 

10.00 

8.50 

8.33 

8.93 

7.50 

0.61 

5.46 

6.68 

4.64 

4.63 

4.48 

4.81 

12.  07 

12.29 

12.  39 

11.60 

11.35 

8.20 

5.91 

5.61 

9.48 

8.81 

0.  I  7 

7.48 

11.12 

10.34 

6.84 

9.97 

6.86 

12.77 

10.18 

11.66 


$9.72 
13.49 
9.48 
15.76 
17.38 
14.89 
10.44 
14.07 
11.82 
13.89 
12.  48 
12.55 
12.41 
14.56 
12.  IS 
15. 14 
10.  G7 
9.25 
8.58 
8.66 
9.09 
7.89 
5.51 
5.30 

4.21 

4.24 

3.82 

4.38 

11.51 

12. 01 

12. 13 

10.85 

12.20 

8.12 

4.62 

4.90 

9.S2 

8.70 

5.75 

6.71 

11.42 

14.84 

6.31 

7.60 

6.08 

11.34 

10.18 

10.41 


$9.90 
13.00 
9.43 
15.22 
16.27 
14.60 
10.38 
14.81 
11.93 
13.67 
11.92 
12.62 
11.65 
12.80 
13.  36 
15.75 
16.25 
8.00 
7.54 

7.70 
7.25 
5.80 
5.10 
7.84 

4.  33 
4.02 
4.14 

5.  OS 
10.63 
11.52 
12.52 
11.17 
11.50 

8.12 
5.35 
4.91 
9.60 
7.70 
6.21 
8.20 
10.75 
12.37 
6.67 
8.50 
6.90 
9.67 
7.74 
10.05 


General  average. 


6.62 


6.00 


7.27 


10.01 


9.06 


9.08 


8.72 


S.  52 


$10. 25 
12.50 
10.00 
17.00 
17.40 
15.00 
12.10 
15.95 
13.40 
15.00 
13.50 
15.50 
14.00 
15.00 
15.25 
15.75 
15.00 
12.00 
12.50 

12.  50 
10.35 

9. 00 
5.50 
7.00 

10.  CO 
4.50 
4.50 

13.25 

13.  a 

13.30 

1 1 .  15 
11.50 

8  50 
5.50 
5.  75 
9.90 
8.90 
7.75 
9.50 

10.75 

12.00 
7.50 
8.00 
8.00 

11.00 
7.85 

11.25 


10.37 


STATISTICS    OF    HAY. 


595 


Wholesale  prices  of  hay  (baled)  per  ton  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


Date. 


1902 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1903. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1904. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1905. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

Juno 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1900. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 


Chicago. 


No.  1  timothy. 


Low.      High. 


$12. 50 
12.00 
12.00 
12.50 
12.50 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 


12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
13.00 
13. 50 
13.00 
13.00 
11.00 
10.00 
10.00 
10.00 
10.00 


10. 50 
10.50 
10.50 
11.50 
12.00 
12.00 
10.00 
10.00 
9.00 
10.00 
10. 00 
10.50 


10. 50 
11.00 
11.00 
11.00 
11.00 
10.00 
10.00 
11.00 
10.00 
10.00 
11.00 
10.00 


10.00 
9.50 
9.80 
10.00 
11.50 
11.50 
12.00 
13.00 
13.50 
13.50 
15.00 
15.50 


$13.00 
12.50 
12.50 
13.00 
13.50 
12.50 
12.50 
12.50 
12.50 
12.  .50 
12.50 
12.50 


13.00 
13.00 
13. 50 
15.00 
15.00 
15.00 
13.50 
13.50 
12.00 
11.50 
11.50 
12.00 


12.50 
12.50 
13.00 
14.50 
15.00 
15.00 
14.00 
15.00 
12.00 
12.50 
12.50 
11.50 


12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12.00 
12. 50 
12.50 
11.50 
12.00 
12.00 


11.00 
10.50 
12.00 
12.50 
12. 50 
13. 00 
10.00 
10.00 
10.00 
15.50 
17.00 
18.00 


Cincinnati. 


No.  1  timothy. 


Low. 


$12. 50 
12.50 
12.75 
12. 75 
1.3.00 
12.75 
13.75 
12.00 
11.00 
13.00 
13.00 
13.75 


15.50 
10.00 
10.00 
10.25 
15.25 
17.50 
10.50 
11.50 
11.. 50 
12. 50 
12.  25 
12.50 


12.50 
12. 50 
12.50 
13.75 
14.00 
13.00 
12.00 
11.50 
11.00 
11.50 
1 1. 25 
12.00 


12.00 
11.75 
11.75 
12.00 
11.50 
10.25 
10.50 
10.00 
11.50 
12.25 
12.00 
12.25 


12.00 
11.00 
12.50 
13. 50 
14.50 
15. 00 
15.50 
15.25 
15.00 
10.00 
17.75 
19.00 


High. 


$13. 75 
13.25 
13. 25 
13.  25 
13.50 
13.00 
15.50 
15.50 
13.00 
14.00 
14.00 
10.50 


17.25 
10.75 
17.50 
18.00 
18.00 
19.50 
18.00 
17.00 
13.50 
13. 25 
12.75 
13.00 


13.25 
13.50 
14.00 
14.00 
15.50 
14.00 
13.75 
14.00 
12.25 
12.50 
12.00 
12.50 


12.75 
12.25 
13.00 
12.50 
12.50 
11.75 
12.50 
12.50 
12.50 
12.50 
13. 50 
13.50 


13.00 
12.50 
13.50 
14.75 
10.25 
16. 00 
18.00 
10.00 
10.25 
18.25 
19.00 
19.50 


St.  Louis. 


No.  1  timothy. 


Low. 


$13.50 
13.00 
13.00 
13.00 
13.00 
12  00 
13.00 
10.00 
9.50 
11.00 
11.00 
13.50 


13.50 
13.50 
14.00 
13.50 
13.00 
14.50 
9.50 
10.00 
10.00 
10.00 
10.00 
10.00 


10.00 
10.50 
10.50 
11.00 
12.50 
12.00 
12.00 
11.50 
10.50 
10.50 
11.00 
10.50 


11.00" 
10.50 
10.50 
11.00 
10.50 
10.50 
10.00 
9.00 
10.00 
10.50 
12.00 
12.50 


12.00 
11.50 
12.00 
13.50 
14.50 
14.00 
11.00 
12.00 
13.50 
14.50 
15.00 
17.50 


High. 


SIS.  50 

14.50 
14.50 
15.25 
15.  50 
15.00 
10.00 
15.00 
12.00 
13.00 
13.50 
15.50 


15.50 
15.00 
10.00 
16.00 
16.00 
25.00 
16.50 
15.00 
12.00 
12. 50 
12.50 
13.50 


11.50 
11.50 
12.00 
13.00 
13.00 
13. 50 
13.00 
13.50 
12.50 
12.50 
11.50 
11.50 


12.75 
12. 50 
12. 50 
13.00 
13.00 
12.50 
14.00 
13.50 
13.00 
13.50 
15.00 
15.50 


14.00 
14.00 
15.00 
17.00 
18.00 
17.00 
17.50 
16.50 
15.50 
16.50 
18.50 
20.00 


New  York. 


No.  1  timothy. 


Low. 


$17.00 
17.00 
17.00 
17.00 
17.00 
18.00 
18. 00 
18.00 
17.00 
17.50 
18.00 
IS.  00 


IS.  00 
18.50 
18.00 
18.50 
19.00 
20.00 
20.00 
18.00 
16.00 
10.00 
17.00 
16.00 


16.00 
10.50 
17.00 
18.00 
18.00 
17.00 
17.00 
17.00 
15.00 
15.00 
1.5.50 
15.00 


15.50 
15.50 
15.00 
15.00 
15.00 
15.00 
14.00 
15.00 
14.50 
15.00 
15. 00 
14.00 


10.00 
15.00 
15. 50 
15.50 
17.50 
18.00 
18.00 
18.00 
17.50 
17.50 
19.00 
20.00 


596 


YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT       E    AGBICUL.TT7BE. 


itton. 

Cotton  crop  of  countries  named,  1901-1905. 

[So  statistics  for  Siam  and  some  other  less  important  cotton-growing  countries.    Bales  of  500  pounds, 

_  ~  -  :    net.] 


1 :  I  ry. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

711   AMEKKA. 

States 

Bah*. 

3 

Bait*. 
10.630,945 

Bale*. 

Bale*. 

13.43S.012 

1.076 

Bale*. 
10.575.017 

—  I"  o  r  t  o 


■ 

Total  Unit       - 

: 

'   ■ 

10.630,945 

•: 

13.439.0S8  | 

10.576,898 

-ala 

gua  f 

r 

1 
British— 

'147 
103. 147 

- 

_ 

■'  147 
103.910 

3 

147 

■ 

i    ! 
- 

13 

11 

630 

133 

<-147 
21     27 

507 

- 

IS 

402 
658  i 
30 
243 

" 
264 
33 

D 

d 290.000 
$00 

2 

14 
720 



--- 

!    • 

445 

- 

■-- 

3 

St.  Vincent  1 

53 

113 

91 

*31 

Turks    acd    Cai 

5 

1 
1 

Cuba 

French — 



1 
12 

- 

'1 
<12 

llaiti* 

. 

W 

n 

rtta  America 

•     - 

10. 740.345 

■   ■   . 

13.701.054 

10.S77.306 

-     DTB         '     ' 

. 

17 

• 

26 

-v  .=■•: 

5,000 

43.776 
200 

230.000 

4 

-:4 

5.000 

-. 

45.672 

200 

495 
270,000 

a 

5.000 
200 

8fi0 
5.000 

815 



:a  axid  Venezuela    

1           »r* 

5.000 

1 

i  05. 000 

200 

- 

349.305 

■ 

"       ! 

341.559 

1      -             — 

j  765 

700 

•   -  ■ 

3,200 

231 
8,000 

700 

■   . 

285 
7.000 

1    ' 
700 

■   .  ■ 

-" 

no 

700 

S.200 



Malta 



340 
7.000 

- 

! 

20.3*. 

' 

•  " 

19,705 

ASIA. 

1       1 

St  -  -     

-   " 
- 

1.200.000 
U3 

i    •"" 

317 

1.200.000 

692 

Jj.000 
371 

.  •      •• 
• 

3.5*>.00O 

.-. 

1.200.000 

1.637 

G-L  Bd  in  the  oil  led.    Quantity  r.f  iinters  produced  as 

foBo«  196,223  n   1902,  500-pound  bales.  194.496  in  1903, 241,942  »n  1904, 

eOfl  :«3- 

<  Ex|     " 
/E.v 

t  Less  than  one-half  bale. 
- 
rage  pi       ition  as  nnoffieially  estimated. 
- 
*  Exports  and  mill  consumption. 


STATISTICS    OF    COTTON.  597 

Cotton  crop  of  countries  named,  1901-190.5 — Continued. 


Country. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

ASIA — continued. 
Dutch  East  Indies  a 

Bales. 
9,160 

Bales. 
8,267 

Bales. 
12,632 

3 

Bales. 
15, 367 
1 
14 
15,255 
16, 262 
70,000 
71,509 
/6,098 

Bales. 
13,280 
b  1 

Federated  Malay  States 

French  India  a 

7,815 

25,762 

70,000 

e  64, 000 

/6,098 

11,139 
19, 152 
70,000 
«  64, 000 
6,098 

13, 693 
17,012 
70,000 
56,282 
/6,098 

c  15, 255 
12,370 
70,000 

6  72,000 
/6,098 

Japan 

Russia,  Asiatic: 

426,000 
56,000 

370,000 
56,000 

476,000 
53,000 

506,000 

49,000 

45,000 

482,000 

426,000 

529,000 

555,000 

612,000 

60,000 

60,000 

60,000 

60,000 

60,000 

Total  Asia 

4,697,767 

5,004,811 

4,961,604 

5, 038, 995 

5,608,979 

AFRICA. 

British  Africa: 

1 

119 

449 
609 
125 
121 
3 

1,805 
598 

001 
59 
45 

1,658 
208 

East  Africa 

6 

GO 

3 

22 

Gold  Coast  0 

Natal 

6  31 

Nigeria — 

Southern,    Colony    (in- 
cluding Lagos)  a 

Southern,  Protectorate  a 

16 

■ 

606 

2,680 
°01 

Northern,  Protecto- 
rate a 

258 

Sierra  Leone  <* 

2 

144 

Uganda  " 



°01 

22 

27 

752 

4,415 

5,447 

Egypt 

1,320,307 

1,209,746 

1,348,759 

1,316,212 

1,250,173 

French  Africa: <> 

Dahomey 

289 
8 

"  289 

Madagascar 

O) 

1 

2 

c'8 

Mayotte 

Senegal 

8 
41 

Somali  Coast 

(?) 

c  41 

Total  French  Africa 

3 

346 

c  346 



German  Africa: a 

East  Africa 

Togo 

1 

2 

43 

148 

872 
499 

871 

■■-• 

Total  German  Africa 

1 

2 

191 

1,371 

1,4S9 

Kongo  Free  State  « 

1 

Portuguese  Africa — Angola  h 

Sudan  (Anglo-Egyptian) 

100 
»'6,517 

61 
*"  6, 517 

6 

6,517 

16 
15,097 

*6 
19, 441 

Total  Africa 

1,326,947 

1,216,353 

1,356,228 

1,337,447 

1,276,903 

OCEANIA. 

British — Queensland 

1 

1 

18 

1 
48 

56 

79 

French:  a 

New  Caledonia 

b  1 

Tahiti 

110 

79 
13  ! 

a 

240 

German  —  Bismarck    Archi- 
pelago a 

656 

Total  Oceania 

110 

93 

312 

123 

1S4 

15,926,048 

17,331,503 

16, 701, 465 

20,368,003 

18  124  636 

, 

o  Exports. 

6  Unofficial  estimate. 

<•  Exports,  1904. 

*  Average  production  as  unofficially  estimated. 

<•  A  ye  rage  exports,  1903-1904. 


/  Census,  1902. 

a  Less  than  one-half  bale. 

ft  Imports  from  Angola  into  Portugal. 

i  Statistics  for  1903. 


598 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


International  trade  in  cotton,  1901-1906.a 

[Bales  of  503  pounds,  gross  weight,  or  47$  pounds  of  lint,  net.] 

EXPORTS. 


Year 

Country. 

1  egin- 
ning— 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

Bales. 

Bales. 

Bales. 

Bales. 

Bales. 

Brazil 

Jan.     l 

.-,4.3)2 

.- 

61,170 

b  111,059 

British  India 

Apr.    1 

1,347 

1,42 

1,1 

1,334.111 

1,741,096 



Jan.     1 

1,288, 

1,37- 

1.158,029 

22 

1,352,517 



Jan.     1 

127,715 

117. 73S 

132,127 

' 

Germany  £ 

J. in.      1 

216,810 

319.  732 

Net Jenunds 

Jan.      1 

100,719 

82,530 

110,568 

104. 182 

Peru 

Jan.     1 

36,948 

30,826 

35,289 

34.  741 

United  States 

J  ulv      1 

7,382 

i,824 

1  4,134 

9,078,080 

..• 

- 

304,868 

391,000 

581, S00 

- 

Total 

10,704,280 

11,215,803 

10,593,910 

12,  s- 

1 1 .  680, 730 

IMPORTS. 


a  See  "  General  note,"  p.  540. 

t>  Preliminary  figures. 

e  Not  including  the  free  ports. 

Condition  of  the  cotton  crop  of  Ou  United  Slates,  monthly,  1889-1906. 


Year. 

June. 

July. 

Au- 
gust. 

Sep- 
tem- 
ber. 

Octo- 
ber. 

Year. 

June. 

July. 

Au- 
gust. 

Sep- 
tem- 
ber. 

Octo- 
ber. 

1889 

P.  ct. 

86.4 
88  8 

S5  9 
85.6 

88.3 
81.0 
97.2 
83.5 

P.  ct. 
91.4 

89.6 
82.3 
92.5 
86.0 

P.  ct. 
89.3 
89.5 

82.3 
80.4 
91.8 
77.9 
80.1 
86.9 

P.  ct. 
85.5 

70.8 
64  -i 
78.3 

81.5 
80.0 
75.7 

70  7 
82.  7 
65.1 
60.7 
70. 0 

1898 

P.  ct. 
89.0 
BE  : 
82.5 

96.1 

74  1 
83.0 
77.2 
84.6 

P.  ct. 
91.2 
87.8 
"   ■ 
81.1 
i 
77.1 
88.0 
77.0 
83.3 

P.  ct. 

91.2 
84.0 
76.  0 

77.2 
81.9 
79.7 
91.6 
74  9 
82.9 

P.  ct. 
79.8 
68.5 
68.2 
71.4 
64.0 
SI.  2 
S4.1 
72.1 
77.3 

P.  ct. 
75.4 

1899 

62.  4 

1900 

67.0 

In' 

1901 

61.4 

1902 

58.  3 

1894 

1903 

65.1 

1904 

75.8 

. 

1905 

71.2 

1897 

1906 

71.6 

STATISTICS    OF    COTTON.  599 

Acreage,  production,  value,  prices,  and  exports  of  cotton  of  the  United  Slates,  1899-1906. 


Year. 


1899-1000. 
1900-1901. 
1901-1902. 
1903-1903. 

1903-J90-1. 
1904-1005. 
1905-1900. 
1900-1907. 


Acreage. 


A  cres. 

624,275,101 
25, 758, 139 
27.220,414 
27,114,103 
28,010,893 
30,053,739 
26,117,153 

c32,049,000 


Production. 


Thousands 

of  pounds. 

M 


Pounds. 

4,407,097 

4,846,471 

4,550,950 

5,091,041 

4,710,591 

0, 420, 09S 

5,000,205 

6, 354, 108 


Bales  of  500 

pounds 

gross 

weight,  a 


Bales. 

9,345,391 
10,123,027 

9,509,745 
10,630,945 

9,851,129 
13,438,012 
10,575,017 
13, 273, 809 


Value,  a 


Dollars. 
370,708,740 


421,(587,941 
570, 499, 824 
501, 100, £80 
556,833,818 
640,311,538 


New  York  closing  prices  per 
pound  on  middling  upland. 


December. 


Low.    High 


Cents. 

7' 

9] 

8    » 

8* 
11.95 

0.85 
11.(15 
10.45 


Cents. 

n 

10ft 

81 

81 
14  10 

9.00 
12.  00 
11.25 


May  of  fol- 
lowing year. 


Cents. 
9 

8ft 
9f 

Hi.  75 
12.  75 
7.85 
11.25 


Cents. 
91 

8ft 

9! 

12.  15 

13.  90 
8  85 

12.00 


■  >i  vim  ptio 
exports, 
fiscal 
year  be- 
ginning 
July  1. 


Bales  of 
sou  lbs. 

6,201,106 

(i,  Or,  I.7S1 
7, 001 ; 558 

8,609,698 
7,268,080 


a  As  reported  by  U.  S.  Census  Bureau. 

b  According  to  Report  of  Twelfth  Census;  the  acreages  for  subsequent  years  are  as  estimated  by  tho 
Bureau  of  Statistics,  Department  of  Agriculture. 
c  As  revised  in  June,  1907. 

Prices  of  middling  upland  cotton  in  New  Orleans,  monthly,  1890-1906. 

[In  cents  per  pound.] 


Year. 


1S90 
1891 
1892 
1S93 
1894 
1895 
1890 
1697 
1S98 
1899 
1900 
1901 
1902 
1903 
1904 
1905 
1900 


January. 


Low.  High 


95 
8-}. 

91 

7ft 
5 

m 

6] 

•r>r 


101J 

h\ 

7ft 

91 
7| 

t;  3 
JIu 

8 

7 

5S 

51 

7| 

9rs 

8 

82 
15i« 

7 
Ui 


February. 


Low.  High 


io:? 

8J 
61 

813 
7ft 

5 

7i 

5} 
5J 
72 
9ft 

7|I 

H 

13i 

7 
10i9s 


1011 
0ft 
« 
91 
7ft 
5ft 
8 

7ft 
Bti 
6 
9 

9ft 
8ft 
91 

10ft 

m 

103 


March. 


Low.  High 


iop 

si 

61 

8ft; 

7i 

Sft 

7? 

0l5 

5ft 
•r'Si 
9 

7ia 

8} 

■v. 

14 

71 

10  V 


11 
81 
64 
9 

7ft 
51 
7rS 
7VI 
55 
6ft 
»ft 
9ft 

9i 
10 

"I,1 
111 


April. 


Low.  High, 


11 

8  A 
6| 


71 

o:§ 

5ft 

5| 
9i 
8 

If 

13? 
73 
Hi 


"U 


73 

6f 

7| 

7J 

5| 

5f 

9J 

8ft 

9f 
10ft 
1  ■"•.■; 

7ft 
lift 


May. 


Low.  High. 


lift 
8ft 
7 

71 
Brl 
6ft 
7| 
7ft 
5}J 
5!i 
8*g 

7  " 
ME 

9s 
10ft 

i-S 
7| 
11 


n: 

8J. 

IP 

71 

7ft 

7 

7| 

7ft 

6ft 

52 

94 

8 

9| 
Hi  J 
132 

83 
lift 


June. 


Low.  High. 


m 


7ft 

62 

6i 

6?2 

71 

52 

54 

81-2 

n 

81S 

11  i" 
103 
81 

io  ft 


HI 

81 
7| 

7| 

7 

7J 

71 

6ft 

5f 

S!l 

8ft 

9ft 
131 
12J 

9ft 
Hi 


Year. 


1890 
1891 
1892 
1893 
1894 
1895 
1890 
1897 
1898 
1S99 
1900 
1901 
1902 
1903 
1904 
1905 
1900 


July. 


Low.  High. 


lift 

n 

7_ 

'Ti 

6§ 
64 
64 


5s 

92 

si 

8f 

12| 

104 
91 
105 


11J 

m 
B 

'i 

62 
61 
6*1 


51 

101 
8x7, 
9t5 

131 

lift 

H.i 

H| 


August. 


Low.  High. 


101 

7| 
6} 
6ig 
6ft 

6ft 

m 

7ft 
51 

51 
91 
8 

12V 
10} 
102 
9ft 


11| 

8 

u 
n 

61 

m 

8 
7Ji 

dlB 

5  \  I 
10} 


13} 
lift 

10ft 

log 


September.      October. 


Low.  High.   Low.  High 


9| 

8 
°li 

5R 
7ft 
71 


93 
<IZ 
8ft 
9:1 

10 
UN 


9}1 

7,; 


10  ft 
81 
7[[ 
Si 
51 
9ft 


10ft 


10} 
10  ft 

10  \{ 

111 


November. 


Low.  High, 


9ft 

7^ 
7{{ 

7ft 
4| 

8A 

51 
41 


75 
'» 

10 

82 
10J 
91 


74 

54 

5ft 

7ft 

92 

7ft 

8 

lift 
9ii 

lift 

HS 


December. 


Low.  High. 


5ft 
71 
6}| 
5} 
5 

7ftr 
9} 
71 
7{| 
114 
64 

H| 
10J 


H 

74 

m 

'  IE 

5ft 

8ft 

71 

51 

5| 

74 

9}i 

8ft 

8g 
13| 

8ft 
12ft 
HI 


600  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    "F    AGRICULTURE. 

COTTON    CROP   OF  THE    UKITKD    STATES,   1790-1906. 

InteUigent  use  of  the  following  table  depends  upon  observing  these  explanations: 
Year. — The  year  mentioned  is.  fur  production,  ihat  of  planting  and  growth;  but 
ginning  continues  ii  "lowing  calendar  year.     When,  in  want  of  figur 

production,  a  commercial  crop  is  taken,  this  represents  the  trade  movement  beginning 
September  1  of  the  growth  year  and  ending  August  31  of  the  following  year.  The 
year  for  exporte  -       -  f  the  growth  year  for  the  period  1790- 

1842(1842iaanine-m  athsy  ar);  July  1  for  1843-18         -       -         .rteen-nic:- 
and  September  1  for  1867-1905;  except  that  the  average  price  of  exports  per  pound 
given  for  the  years  1791-1800  "lowing  and  nearly  coincident  calendar 

years  adopted)  is  derived  from  a  re]  fS  sury  Woodbury  (Ex 

No.  1-46.  24th  Cong.,    -    -     - 

Production —  f  running  bales.— 1790-1834  ..:.        -  '.  net 

weight  in  pounds  divided  by  net  weight  per  bale;     -         - 

1865-1868,1870-187 Latham,  A] 

der  &  Company's  l  Movement  ictuation;     • 

1899-1906,  production,  Census;  1861-1864,  commercial  n  and  Pri 

Cotton  for   One  Hundred  Years,  by  James  L.  Watkins.  Bulletin  No.  9,  Bureau  of 

Statistics.  United  States  D  pact    tent  of  Agriculture.     I  -  included,  1S99-1906. 

Number  of  running  bales  of  linters,  1S99.  114.544:  1900.  143,500;  1901. 

196,223;  1903,  195,752;  1904.  245.973:  1905,  230,497;  1906.  322.064. 

—linters  included.  1899-1906.  with  same  muni 
bales  as  above  for  1899-1902;  500-pound  bales  in  1903.  194.486:  1904.  241.  •   . 
229.539:  1906.  321,68 

Production — :  —1790-1898,  Bulletin  above,  and  Latham. 

Alexander  &  Company,  above;  1899-1906.  Census.     Pinters  not  included. 

right. — 1790-1S34.  production,  report    ES     i   taryW      Ibury, 

above;  1839.  production.  Census:  1835-1838,  1840-1848,  1850-1858,  1860-1868,  1870- 

578      •        L888,  18S       J98        mmercial  crop,  and  1849.  1859.  1869,  1S79.  1889,  1899- 

production,  number  of  bales  multiplied  by  average  net  weight  per  bale.     Linters 

not  included. 

Price  per  pound  of  lint. — 1S69-1898.  fami  price.  December  1.  Bureau  of  Statistics, 

Department  of  Agriculture,  specific  inquiry:  1899.  Cent    -  farm  value  divided 

by  total  net  weight:  1900-1901,  no  information:  1902-1906.   Census,   New  Orleans 

Cotton  Exchange  value  for  upland  cotton,  computed  by  multiplying  total  net  weight 

by  mean  exchange  price  for  estimal  .     -  and  Charleston  and  Savannah 

n  Exchange  value  for  sea-island  cotton.     Linters  not  included. 

.:/  value  of  lint. — Total  net  weight  multiplied  by  price  per  pound,  t :.  899. 

Linters  not  included,  because  included  in  value  of  seed,  which  ws  -     Hows 

for  the  only  v      -   I        rhich  ascertainable:    At  the  farm.  10,575;  at   the 

mill.  1902.  §80.209.194:  1903.  884.049.406:  1904,  $90,931,250;  1905.  875.464.515:  1906, 

35.699. 

.  iion. — Linters  included.  1899-1905.     No  account  .    :  -       a  at  begin- 

ning and  end  of  year.     The  rigu:   s  are  i  I   production  plus  net 

imports  minus  dor..  ;nd  do  not  stand  i  .  consumption  for  any 

certain  year,  concerning  which  see  Bui.  No.  63,  Bureau  of  the  Census. 

<rU. — Including  reexports.  1790-1800,  not  including  reexports 
American  State  Papers;  1820-1905,  Bureau  of  Statist:  b,  Department  of  Com- 
merce and  Labor.     Linters  included.  1897-1905:  uncertain  included  before 
1897  and  after  this       asol        ton  fin    appeared  in  trad<    -          fterl870. 

-.   including  reex]       -       1       18        not  including  reexports. 
1801-1818,  American  State  Papers;  1819,  Report    ES  Ibury,  above;  1820- 

1905.  Bureau  of  Statistics.  Department  of  Commerce  and  Labor:  except  that  the 
imports  given  for  the  years  1791-1793  are  for  the  following  cal  -  rs,  being  nearly 

coincident  with  the  commercial  crop  y 

Linters. — 1899-1906.  included  in  production  of  running  balec  quivalent  500- 

pound  bales,  and  in  consumption.     Included  in  domes:  •     -    xplamed  above. 

Gold  values. — All  values  have  been  reduced  to  gold  for  1862—1878 
Bureau  of  the  Census.- — In  the  preparation  of  the  following  table  the  Bureau  of  Sta- 
tistics of  the  Department  of  Agriculture  has  been  favored  with  the  cooperation  of  the 
Bureau  of  the  Census  of  the  Department  of  Commerce  and  L 


STATISTICS    OF    COTTON. 


601 


"fe 


5,-Si  S  5  c  sb 
11  z.  —  c  &"3 
W  P.     * 


>?1 "SS 

■= "?  -  —  c  tc 

?1  ^  »i 


.  Ci  —  C  C J  CT-  cc  CT  »  rc  r-  C-  t -  i~  ^r  » t  -^  : 

.  C  ^  IT.  -(  c  h  r:  t^  c  x  c  ^-  H  H  f  c.  ■ 


;  C  —  t<  -r  x  '  -  r 

-i  e  ©  <r  - 

Ca  TO  -r  •*> 


M  —  L-rrOC^^  —  C1SCC^01'HH 


_,       to  ca  o  —  r-  oc  t-  o  O  —  ' fc-ooosoOiooOtpoBt-egt oa  to  ga  to  •«<  -o«  co 

g    .to  l-5  ■-=  i"  —i  w e i> e ci  — i  e  to      nt[»oi-  ca  ca  •*  ■»      ^      oi>  — —  c^^ 
w^*  ci  cf  V-«r  to" to" to" -^"^      e  to*  -   -  *-T      c  *-Ccf  cf 

.2  -S  e  ° 

^  ~<* 

o  o 


^  c  ©  e  c  to  to  ©  c  ©  c  o  —  to  —  :c  tt  to  c;  t~  ca  to  t~  ci  —  —  -r  ->r  ca  ©  -J"  — i  ao  oc     c. 
~  to  ca^i  to  to  to  ^  ©  ^  oc^  c:  ci  ©  ^  to  ci  ©  to  to  to  ©*  ci  id  -cicr-i:t^C(OH     ^ 


t~  - 

c  h. 


SS3fctX?SSrtS:lS£N2CI-'sct;Ocr.i.r.-.i>oni5n 

TO  -r  -X.  C  ~  X   ~  TO  »-.  —  y_  —  TO  ~.  TO  —  r  :  ~ .    -  TO  ^-:t.-.-Th  c:  _:  ©  r~  Ci 

■  HiON^HNcqiONa>nNon<c  oa  -;r.c-icx- t-  5a  oa  to  ■?■  a  x  x  ©  r~ 


•  —  to  ©  03  r-  o 


C  1  TO 


KCCKOttSI-  Ca  —  TO 


to  «5  -  55  ©  i 


fl«rtOC««C:OCMN1iK 


3  S 


■         -   -   -     -       « 


v.  to  ca  cc  c_i  —  l~  y_  to  —  to  ~.  5E  oc  to  u-  c.  -c  c  -)  to  r:x-Tcr;';Hiny.cMtt     P 

g.TO  >--0  ri  ."  TO  C :  Tl  -  TO  =T  ?j  x"  u-' ~" -' 0>J  TO_  TO  — "  C:*-T— oC  l-"c"o"— cTut"^^"     ■& 


(4. 

B 

i 

c* 

*  5 

<^. 

B  d 

s 

=3  g 

«-  K 

"S 

c  ° 

§s 

8  .SS8SSSSSSS8SSSS8SS 


«^1 


■  L-J  -_•  ^  i^  5^  x  r-  x  ^x  Ni^t^^rif 


:;cj-;;jcc5co 


^  TO  »-"  TO  '"  l-  (-  TO  i-  to  '-^  'A   ^'/CC:CCCTrC  £^  TO  C  C  '-^  --  ^1  C  O  1*  GO  n  *        — 

°C»n«c)n  t<  ri  ca  o  ci  ci  n  ct  ca  c;  -i  ra  ci  ca  ri  ?)  ca  ci  ?i  ca  ca  ca  ca  r5  ci  c-a  S ra     .5 


c^flSJa  tog 


t^CQ-^f-"* 


;  :i  -  C  C  -r  c  -  ^  c  i-  c-i  ■.-  ^ 


*^  ro  oo  t—  -—  r^  re  Ti  —  cc  t-  r i  —  -^:  ri  y  -r  -^  ; 

i  -i  -  :  i  •*  n  r  •  c.  c."C  x  m  ^  c  o  c.  ^r  r:  : 

S;  CC  "^  w  w   »   CDOCQ   HHCOOU5>C   i-t    —  t-  I  -  '^f  —  r^  t*  Eao©  C^cT— ri-TcT'^'circr 

-  «  -  ?i  c»  ^ f  n  c  -  ^  ^  ^r  c  -c  <--  n  t-  cc  c  -r  -  .-  n  c  -r  r:  i*  ?c 


:  CI  OC   Ci  » 
■*   - — <  ■ —  •—  \_>  at^~  Ci  ■«;  ;-_ 


g  ^  n  <e  ^ 


• ';  S  2  J   '-  -  ^  ^  N  ~  *  ••;  ?i  m  ^  x  ^  lc  -i  c  l-  r:  oc  x  o  ^  c  c  c:  ■-  c  ci  oo 
•  -^  :  j  l-  t:  ^  x  c  x  l-  c  c  ?j  c  x  i  '  x  x  5  -  ?5  x  x  ' 


■w  ^  <-i  i...  i,^  r»  ^  ^r  c: 
-  r- w„*.-.CONC5'«,iCl;o© 

-  fiM^co^t!"o/.  l:-::  m  c  c  ^  /  r;  :r/  :i  r  c  c  c  ^    -*r  r  r-r  c 

a  i-ic*e5  o«  w  cow  ci  co  co  c<i  co  co  coo  co  ■*  ^•^Soioof- 


-  r_j«    © 


C  N  X  Q  C  -  Cl  CC  T  i-  C  t-  X  C-  C  -  C-i  : 


QOCbC6<SAftO)0>5C~C   wOObOOHHHHHHHHHHC^CiN 
M^NNNNNSNNXXXXX/.X   XXX   XCCXX/.   //.XOCCCMW0C 


602  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


3    =  -      - 
—  -"    _     - 

=-~=  c  ~ 

- 
x  — 

0  *• 

1  1 

r*  —  3Ts:irr:r  _>■_    -  r    a  r    -_■--■-_-,----        r 
.  —  r.  i-    -  3  —    •            .    -    -{i-iO-o~en--xx«c:    .:.-.— 

•_  r.               .--..:-:       -       r.  i_  —    -  -      -  *    -    —  _  l-  _  -  -  —  .  -.       —    --  —  _  — 

1 

:- 

c 

_  r.  x    -.   -.  ~  —  c  _  --    -a _  -  -.  -    --  —    -    -    3    -.     <ot    _    3  c 

-r  —  —  n  X  —  3: r.  -r  ^l  _  ■*"•  1  -    t  —     - x>  _;  _  -^KCffXT  —  _    - 

.  -r                    "     _    —         -          -      -               —   —    -     "                     --—        ?J        T. —  T-   _   IC  —  —  X 

€                                       -                      - 

E 

_- 

- 

-. ._„._- --_-x—  __-:-  —  =:X_:!-^_:- 

r  S 

7 

g    5oc    _  _  _  t.  cs  _i  h  ri  _  s>  _*o «*dflBe               -                                  -    '    - 

—  : 

be 

3 

.-.-__.     :               -    - -          - -     -   -  —  — 

r:E 

^  -r  ra  :_  x  —  _._-:—  r.  r  —  •  -  x  —  t-  i~  _  r   - 

R  X  0  —        :     -    r     " _     -  —         ~    -       :  _    _                                                               -  —  —  ~  r3 

-    _         -       . :  —  x  —  _  —  - .  r.  1  -  _   _   _  r  '    -    —  :    r  —  *-  _  r-i 

- 

—  c 

s    -' 

- 

'- 

—  — 

_ 

—  —  L. (.  - —    - .   -              _____  .  _.  --  —  j- M  -j  t 

a 

----  —  _    -     _     -    -   _  -    .    _  _-  T-)  i~  ?j  _  -:  tj  rj  _  r:  r    -    c— :            "    — 

_rs  —  -^  *~       _.--__,-_-            __-      ■  ■    --NvcL-Nr:  —  •  -  x  —  xx 

—    -  _  -    —  _  -.  1  -  ~j  r.  x  x  r   —  -  —  —  :  .  x  cr.  _  i — r^-:j-  :i  ..  -  ;:   : 
-: 71  ts  71  d  rj  r-.  —  re  re —                               ---.:__-  _  —  -.  _  ~  _  — 

■ 

; 

= 

_ 

_- 

— 

— 

_ 

— 

.  ,- 

•  -  - 

— 

r:  x  — 

:- 

— 

- 

- 

-_ 

- 

— 

■- 

^  «C  _i  — 

- 

- 

- 

_ 

- 

— 

— 

.- 

-- 

- 

■ 
- 

- 
_ 

= 

- 

- 

_ 
3  ta 

-- 

— 

- 

: 

—  - 

— 

X 

— 

- 

- 

X 

- 

~ 

~  -     - 

— 

" 

j. 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

_ 

S-" 

x  x  :    re 

- 

.      X 

« 

E 
- 

if 

c 

- 

»S 

5" 

Tl  M  Ti 

- 

<G  t-  I- 

i ; ■                  i  =  :■■■:::::::•:.•:  :i  :•:•:  : 

1         ^.jj.l.j... !.!.!. ..MM. Mi:!! 

| 

_ 

- 

_ 

c 

S  X- 

*j-            iiilfisil                     ilslfflj 

_ 

__:   H 

g 

-                        _;c.-_-    —    -  —  r  —  _— r.t-—  —  _.—■——    -r- _:,            ;   —  _  —  - 

_  —  _                                                      --               .                                                        ~   — --_.--_-.-.-..- 

_  — -.    _     _:                                                                                                                                              -J. r  —  — ____. ._ 

OS 

□ 

r-  —  r-rx*^-_xx_.  _:~^  —  _  —  _>_■_>£    —  ___r-:r-:  —  ^-:-_x-^r-.  '    _  _ 

i  _.                                   t.  r;  r     -  -        —  .-  —    :  -    _  —  -    —                 —             _ _  -t  r- 

=  _—           -                _  c  i~  -r  rj  x  r.  ^.  :     -  .     -             ;        .-.            _-----r.r.         —  c 

— L"  _    -                                                                                                                      7                                                     - 

_  _  _    _                        s  x  -                              -—•:__----.—  ;    - ■■     .    -  :                                   -  -  rj  1-  — 

—  =  _    -  r  .               ^~~         -       ---            r"-~                         _-_:-_  —  _  r —  ■ r~  1- 1         ; 

"_;__:  ——       '                                                                        _'_"_'_.'_."_"_' r    —  r—  -                                       ifofca 

Q 

Kr       Vfyy                     .  x  x  x  r;  _  ri  _  rt  —  _     -    _        _     - ---.  __----_-_ 

_P                                     _  -    —  __--rr  —  -:    -     ■                                          _r                  r:  = f-  c_  «_ » t_ 

_  y-  -     -  —                     .   r     -     -    -  3    _    ~         —   -          —     -  -'   —        _   2     ~  X  -r  . :  ^:  _  : .  3    -   -              7    - 

E  -  =  = —                                     _                   —           :  -    _  -    f  ~  x  !-  T:  r.  _ 

_.rr—                 tt  —  1-  x  _  x  c  _  _  r  —  -    -      .—            __^-z:—    -— —  —  _  —  -_  _  r^j 

__  ~   r   £  n                  ^                 —            — *  — '■  —  —  —  —  — ."_"_."_."  r ."——':'  r  ':"  r "  —  - 

O 

-        _             r  r  -  ^'  r:  ■?■  «=  _:  n  k  *  z  -  m  "  -  c  _  >  3;  r.  c  -  :  1  -  -:  -  :  - 

?si  tj  r-j  r o  r-  ?    r -  —  r:  r-  ~  —  --  r.  .— .  r.  — _  L-  i-  <--  _r_  L-  i__  »- 

oo  __■  00  -0  __■  ae  ac  _c> ac  at  ao  ao  _c  ao  ac  _c  ao ac  ac cc  ao  _c  ao-oc  _o  x:  sc  oc  ae  oc  ao  ac  ao  SB xe 

STATISTICS    OF    COTTON. 


603 


*-l  IO  IO  00  CI  •  .      . 

r-  co  -*r  r~  co  o 


O  O  *  ^  ^  C  ^  ^  CC'  ri  O  C-  CO  N  rH  y:  N  -^  o  ci  o:  -^  ^  O  ^  iO  iO  C:  m  C1)  CJ  W  OO  O  O  CO  00  N  ^ 

«coowMO^t^vcoooovriNWMC^u5aJciccc:cc^,^rcot''():C'jNiriO"(NMTi' 


OO^JOrt  , 


rtHH^tOCOt-CHHOOMH© 


co  ©■  ©  —  c  :: 


NC0OO^Oi0^OHNC0nCOOC'l^^l^G^f5OWOC0O'*NOt-<f0C0t"'C'3M'H^0l00«0C'lNB 
O  O  «-.i  CO  ro  a  CC  »  5;  «D  5«  OOO&OIO  i-*  *-*f-*C«  O  »0  gt^rtUJ  -himOOCCGOGCCjHCO  CO  r-»V(MM<ON^rClCJ 


Ct  CO  M*  04  "^  iO  i-O  IQ  VOCCiN-Htog 


O  I--  co  co  1  -  00  co  t  ©  "O  t  O  'C  co  Ci  co  <— <  o  — <  co  ©  so  —  c  1  co  13  1-  -v  rr  lo  ai  ?)  ci  o  'O  01 1  -  o  «  J  Xt  «  c-  5o  ^  h  01 

©COO^NOt^H^l*TPh.h©OOHQV^«NTrLOWCOHCOl.TWHCJ(>lWWWCOUJHTPWlOOO» 

cm"io"io"© cTco'iv-h"  ^h  eld Ncf^rd ci -^r^©  i-.''©  cfoo"©" i-T co"  © © HV"dMdo^ON"HHri35ioHo"ood6a"w 

sco-HHCiciHooco/'Mc:i-7  02«oaT>-:i,a)WcooOHCoc)ic  ©  co  ©  o  cciccoo^ci-omS  1-. 

I>  iO  ©  fC^^C'OC^QW^O^O^MC'H-TrOOirj^.NCUOOt^aWOO^COOit^rHiXoWWOOWrHOi 

eTco""  r4Vt  th  r-<  i»<  <M  i-Tn  c^c*  co  cfco"co"co"  v'M^VM^"^V^^\o^^O'c^^Vodcoooo3o", 


tD  00  h  O  CO  O  Ol  N  T  t-  C 1  !   ;   1  .   .    -,  ^  r  r  1  o  -^  /.  I  .  -7  -^  -J  CO  CO  ?  I  f  -  '  1  <©,  CO  — >  ©  "  1  -"  'X  ;   '■  ©  "0  'V  r-  ».-,  ^r  ^T  'M  O  -T» 
^COOW^COOWWWCOM^NCOOCflhNOrtNNOOOWNOOVH^OOONONONTPW^HCC^ 

00  e-f  co"  ©  ©  co  a?  t^  ©  ©  -v  ©?  10"  ©  r^1 


o  n  mo  h  h  00  o  o  'i  o  :o  h  :  1 1 :  h  f  1  oci  ai  co  o  --.  c  co  o  o  o  g  o  c.  1 


OOCO  Hr 


)  ©  O  >o  ©  ©  —  :■ 


•iO'-'mq-^n  ri  or.  ©  co  ©  ; 


;  !••  t*  O  O  T  C-  IM  CO  CI  iO  tp  i-O  CO  00  ci  <o  CI 


'  '  ~.   r-  'S-  ©  — '  c*  1  >-h  CO  CO  00 


CO  O  Ol  00  H  TP  W  H  ti5  1< 

cn  i^i^cTcIcroic^cf  c^ctcTcdVrco~co"c^co  co"w  co'co  *=rco' 


tOO^NOO^C'i'r'rcroi-  co  Ct  00  —  0  ©  -*  ci  — <  co  *■  c  -■  M  cio  h  ^  n  «  o  h  co  o  h  o  o  n  ^  rt  h  «  h  o  M  ' 
co  cn  00  ao  t^  r^  00  co  -r  ©  ©  ©  :-  o  o  —  -r  _-■  ©co  .0  -"rx:iTC-.;i-  ©  0  "i-r-jrc  ©  ci-oti-cicc-:  ^t ' 

C0©C0i-iO^M00C0i-tOCCiO©C0©©©C*DC<J©Cl©r^00C*Cl©L0M 


io  o  -^  ci  h  r>  o  0  »o  ro  ©  r*  co  x  ©  -r 

CO  '-O  r  I  "?  f  I'  O  O  f  ^  c  00  o  w  o  o  .  .  . 

0)OCHOO'»1COML'5  00CjOh.H05Hi-iOCIC«COTt-Ot-.(N(-NHOM 


£-  Ci  CO  r*  ©  — *  X  :i   C~-X-C(-X--l|-  X  0C  X  :o  :i  XCClcO^NiOiOOCl 

,,'/oono5,!J,ai'o^cii,oaoc  *o  co  ©  ©  ci  0  rx  1-  ci  co  — <  10 o  © 
iO  t^  i-m  CI  C 1  <-"  *-  ■     ■ 


ilW^H 


1  TT»  t~.  iO  ©  CO  tO  ©  O  GO  ©  © 
r-T        T-ii-Hr-lT-li— '1— iHnrt  r^TcI  rH  rH  CJ~  cJcrcTCl"  CICO  CN  CN  «^cJ  C  l"  COCO  cfcd  cT^CO  "^f  CO 


OCOHOOO^O-'Ni.OOONOCOCi'-'NCOIHHHVCOClNCOCTiOH 

HHHH[-.coHt:i[,0"a,T<oOHh.rorOOf  oocuoociohn 

OJOHOClOO'fl'HOnClrtHyjOCOI-Oa'VCOCCviOGV'-iClCHOH 

©prC©  cj  rj-  g£5f«2  SQ^f^sT  -,i",T  ^f  S?  Q  cT^1""''?©  ?I^cm  ^cood-  " 


O  N  C/3  O  O  CI  CI  W  O  Q  IO  N  iO  W  iO  ^  t-  -^  K  CO  ^  ^  J5  CO1  1.-3  ^  tji  r>-  CI  CI  [■- 


j  ?r  ©  Ci  co  00  t-i  00  c-u 


t—  COCOQ0COHCIO5CII 


?CONiOCONMCONC;<-icO-H^iNOOC3liOcO'<3,M 
CO  Ol  "ej*  CI  CO  f  iO  "T  t  -  CO  Ci  'O  •— <  CO  -C  Ci  lo  NiQimCI 
1  CN  CI  CN  0Q  C4  CJ  CM  CM  CN  CI  CI  CO  CO  CI  C  I  CI  CI  C-l  CO  CO  CO, 


^lOiOLOQ 


OHOI^HOHOT^CIWODOOIOCI'OHL'OIOMOW'S'OCOCC 

^c4r^«o^Mr4cAC3o6ocftOc&CAo>a6(^o6o6Q(5o6t^o6c^<^>t^ 


CO  CJ  CO  Q  00 


CI  CI  t^c 
06  ci  00  ^  c> 


OHSOOOOWH^HCOV(HOC'10NOC)Nc:^*:ii:/.COOrt^OM^COCOOVONNNHOHHCO^!/. 
<~  ro   ~-  O  O  l;    — .  '_:■  X  O  — 1  I-  CI  CO  ■*&  'O  >— '  T  Ci  CO  T-  CO  -r  C  1  X  ~   re  T  rO  r--  CO  CO  r-  CO  r-~  •—>  O  '0  ",  C-  ~ ■    ~-  r-  >r  — ■  ~ .   —    :~    o 
VVHt3CNCOHh.HCH^Cll^QriOiON^ClHOOCKO^OOLQCOCX/L7CCOt*OOC10»OCOMO^O)CO^C 
CO  CO*" CO  co  co" ■*" co" ©  i-T t-T o 


co  co  co  -*  co  ©  i-h  t-h  ©  o  co  r--  o  ^h 
co^rco-— i^ococi'^cicii- '  ^  L5 


:  r--  o  -— «  ©  co  co  x>  X  ct  x  •->  ©  ©  -n  tt  00  ©  ©  -h  c  1  co  cj  00  ci  ^r  r--  00  co  t-*  ©  ©  ~-<  ©  co  o  ^r 
Oi  x  co  ^  co  r-i  -f  o  co  0 1  » o  c  1  c  1  ^-<  •f  1.0  'X. ■  1  -  co-  —  ■."■..  — .  :o  '  ~  to  ?■-  c  1  -r  ^  ©  o  f  -  ~  1  -  00  t  ■-  cn  ^h  i-^  co  ^h  ©  -^-  »o  cn  ^  c  1  co  uo 
i^^c<)t^c>-c^i^©©T^©co©cot*c/i©o©i^ci©©^ci©©©©cvico»o©ciF^uoi>-Trr^co^^co^©t^^oc^ 

r  CN?  r-i"  cf  Cf  CN  CO?  CN  CO  CN  Ci  co"  rg  CO  CO  CO^^Co  CO  ^co"^»-o"^^^^0  ^r  ©  O  © 


r-  h-  w  rr  .-:  -^  ©  ci  co  **  -^  ©  ^  ©  ©  t^  f  ©  ©  ©  Ci  ©  c 


co  ci  ©  ©  co  ©  ci  00  r--  ©  ^h  cn  r—  -r<  ci  ©  ©  co  c 

t-^HOOiOON'ONH" 

C»TfTTiO©C5c0cO©CO' 


1  -V  tj*  CJ  CO  CO  » 


^CONCONClMCOHTMNO^fflNMO^WClCOMONHCOiO^COOO 

J  1^  ©  1— 1  10  «o  © 

)  !>•  t— 1  CO  ©  "-0  ■*& 


00  CO  > 

<  o  o  n  m  k  o  r-i  co  n  t^-  -r  h  o  c  . 

}  t-O  ©  t-  O  ©  00  CO  ©  10  CO  ©  l>*  CO  ©  1 


COO-— 1  ©  ©  ©  ©  CO  X) 


■co  ©  co  00  ci  co  t  o  co  ©  ©  co  i—i  i-H  cn  -^r  -^  co  ci  ci  ©  co  ©  »p  ci  cn  co  t  ©  co  'O  r-  10  ©  ^r  10 


.  ,.  tt  ©  ©  Tji  cn  ©  -^r  t  cn  1-  cj  ».o  >o  i^-  ci  ©  -— t  ©  t  co  o  co  co  ci  ©  co  — <  00  ci  r--  co  -t>  o  00  ci  t  co  ©  co  o  ro  r  -  c 

i>  rn  00  ^  10  ^  o  o  n  c*  --«  n  o  t-  co  co  10  co  '  -  — 


■•  CO  T-t  CO  O  "^  CO  CO  00  ©  tt  iO  ©  CO  TT  ©  *-i  t^  CI  i-O  ^T  CI  ©  'CO  ©  ©  00  O 

c^"^cj"crcf^crco"co"co"^^^^^©  t^©*-oT to  ©coco©  t^c»c«©^©  t^c<T^^cr©©cn©co  ©"co" 


^  CI  O  O  O  O  O  O  ^  ^  r^  CO  N  ^  Y)  «  r^  CO  C  iO  tO  O  O  C^  O  O  O  rH  N  M  O  r^  N  Cl  i.O  N  H  CO  ' 

hltjooooh  to  >.-  -o  ©  ■—  '  *■  ©  'X  cn  —  -o  co  ■  -  10  >--  -r  >::■  ro  co  ©  co  co  ©  •-»  cn  t^>  co  1— 1  to  "&  c 

OO^OOOOCOCJO^OCOMLOfOOMOCCHCQNONCl'HOOCOCIiOiOCOCOOOClWi; 


©  ©  CI  ©  CO  1-1  ©  CI  > 


r-ci  — •©© 


OONQOOOOOir-OO^MTOCClClfffOTPiO 

h  "/)  t  0  o  ' "  o  ■ ;  c-  m  -c  -.  <c  i  -  :  :  1  -  ^  :  0  n  r^  mo 
©cooo»-oco,tr;oci©oco©co©©i-'00co-^,r^.©o. 

•*5Tio*co"^i-r  ciVfc!  ci  co"^r  cfco""^ co  ■^r*,<r  ^o  lq  ©  ic  cc  *o*o  ©  © 


o  ©  ©  co  co  «c  to  ©  00  ci  ci  io  ©  ©  «-» r-  i^-  ©  -^  h-  io  00  ^r1 
O  o  s*  ^  ©  r-  ©  t  co  (-  o  co  ©  t  ©  '  o  >  .0  ©-  r-  ©  -rr  r^  co 

COTCt^l^OiOOOTPOCNOOHt-HCIiOCI^I- 


lo  t>  »o  o 


■©l>-G0©©l^©I>C0i-<i-<©©©©©CO©CO 


r     ©  ©  ^h  CJ  CO  ^  O  CO  IN-  CO  ©  ©  >-<  CJ  CO  ^  IO  ©  l>-  00  ©  ©  i— "  CI 


»o  O  CO  CO  c 


>r^.i^-i^.t--t~»t^-i^.r^t 


10  ©  r—  co  ©  ©  1— 1  ci  co  mi  4Q  co  1  -  >x  ©  ©  -h  ci  co  ^  10  co 


co  00  00  00  'X  x  x  x  x  ©  ©  ©  ©  ©.■  ©  ©  : .  ©  ©  c  cr  ©  ©  ©  ©  © 


00  co  co  co  x  00  00  x  00  00  00  00  co  00  co  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  06  00  00  co  00  go  co  00  00  co  co  x  x  x  x  x  x  x  x  x  ©  ©  ©  cn  ©  ©  © 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Clots<'  pound,  in  leading  United  Stales 

'.  -    jfj. 


: '  - 

Jan "  ■ 

Feb... 

liar 

Apr 

Mav.. 

• 
Ang... 

&■•::...      .       " 

Oct... 

I  .      • 

Dec... 

:■■*> 
Jan 

■ 

:•    ■ 

Apr 

? 

July 

Oct 

Kor... 
Dec 


3 

11 

1 

. 

. 

STATISTICS    OF    TOBACCO. 


605 


lnt<r  national  trade  in  cotto7i-seed  oil.  1901-1906.a 
EXPORTS. 


c°BHta*           ISitl    190L       1902- 

1903.               1904.               1905. 

Gallons          Gallons. 

Belgium Jan.      1          878,907          877,851 

Egypt Jan.      1  !        197,013           479.155 

Fiance Jan.      1           495,296'        375,361 

Netherlands Jan.      1             37,450  ''          44,328 

United  Kingdom Jan.      1       5,206.109       S. 299,636 

United-States Julv     1     33, 042, S4S     35.042.994 

Other  countries !        131.000            72,000 

i 

Gallons.        Gallons.        Gallons. 

714.319         1,252,803 

426, 14S           397.446             24l'.--4.; 

394.169           213. 0S7             511.743 

230,762          168,425            168,686 

6,725,236       4,865,745         5.323.636 

29,013,743     51,535,580       43,793,519 

11,000  .            1,000  '            42. COO 

Total 39, 988,623     45 .  79 1 .  325 

37,471,713     57  S45  609       51  34°  °30 

■ 

IMPORTS. 


Algeria Jan.  1 

Australia Jan.  1 

Austria-Hungary Jan.  1 

Belgium Jan.  1 

Brazil Jan.  1 

Canada July  1 

Egypt Jan.  1 

France Jan.  1 

Gemianv  c Jan.  1 

Italy <  Jan.  1 

Malta Vpr.  1 

Martinique Jan.  1 

Mexico July  1 

Netherlands ;  Jan.  1 

Senegal Jan.  1 

I"  nited  Kingdom Jan.  1 

Uruguay :  July  1 

Other  countries 

Total 


o  See  ''General  note,"  p.  540. 
6  Preliminary  figures. 


<"  Not  including  free  ports. 
d  Average,  11*1-1904. 


TOBACCO. 
Tobacco  crop  of  countries  named.  1001-1005. 

[Production  for  South  America  (especially  Brazil'  largely  understated,  because  domestic  consumption 
is  unknown.  No  statistics  for  China,  Persia,  Central  America  (except  Guatemala"!.  West  Indies 
(except  Cuba  and  Porto  Rico),  and  several  less  important  tobacco-growing  countries.] 


Country. 


1901. 


1904. 


1905. 


NORTH  AMERICA. 

United  States: 

Contiguous 

Noncontiguous— Porto  Rico 


Pound*.  Pounds. 

818,953,000  i     821,S24.000 
8,000,000  i        8.000,000 


Pounds.      '      Pounds.  Pounds. 

815,972,000   060,401,000    633,034,000 

5,000,000  •        5,000,000  6,000,000 


Total  United  States  (ex-  i 
cept  Philippine  Islands).     826,953,000       829,824,000 


820,972,000       605,461,000         639,034,000 


Canada: 
Ontario. 
Quelle. . 


Total  Canada. 


Cuba 

Guatemala. 
Mexico 


3,114,000  3,071,000 

6  5,000,000        6  5,000,000 


2,423,000  3,035,000  :       o6,275,000 

6  5,000,000  ;      6  5,000,000  |       a  3, 100,000 


8,114,000  ,        8,071,000 


7,423,000 


8,035,000 


9,375,000 


45,892.000  :      57,177,000 

1,051,000  I        1,063,000 

26,256,000  j    020,000,000 


o38,731,000      042,421,000  j     o48,783,000 

1,065,000  •        1,983,000  c  1,300,000 

29,156,000  ;      28,880,000  :     o23,000,000 


Total  North  America 908,266,000'    916,135,000 


S97,347,000       746,780.000         721,492,000 


a  Unofficial  estimate. 

6  Estimated  from  census  statistics  for  1900  and  unofficial  estimate  for  1905. 

c  Average  production. 


006  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Tobacco  crop  of  countries  named,  1901-1905 — Continued. 


Country. 


SOUTH  AMERICA. 

Argentina  « 

Bolivia  b 

Brazil  c 

Chile  & 

Ecuador  c 

Paraguay 

Perne 

Total  South  America 

EUROPE. 

Austria-Hungary: 

Austria 

Hungary 

Bosnia-Herzegovina 

Total  Austria-Hungary. . . 

Belgium 

Bulgaria 

Denmark 

France 

Germany 

Greece 

Italy 

Netherlands 

Roumania 

Russia 

Ser  via 

Sweden 

Turkey / 

Total  Europe 

ASIA. 

British  India"* 

Dutch  East  Indies: 

Borneo 

Java 

Sumatra 

Total  Dutch  East  Indies. . 

Japanese  Empire: 

Japan 

Formosa 

Total  Japanese  Empire. .. 

Philippine  Islands 

Total  Asia 

AFRICA. 

Algeria. 

British  Central  Africa 

Cape  of  Good  Hope 

Mauritius 

Natal 

Orange  River  Colony 

Total  Africa 


Pounds. 

28,000,000 

3,000,000 

73,791,000 

0,000,000 

42,000 

6  10,000,000 

1,500,000 


1902. 


Pounds. 
31,000,000 

3,000,000 
99,473,000 

0,000,000 
179,000 

8,510,000 

1,500,000 


1903. 


Pounds. 
22,000,000 

3,000,000 
51,583,000 

6,000,000 

399,000 

10, 2%,  000 

1,500,000 


122,333,000       149,662,000 


9,089,000 
125,934,000 
«9, 000, 000 


144,623,000 


10,647,000 

5,590,000 

293,000 

55,905,000 

88,213,000 

6  14,000,000 

12,734,000 

2,708,000 

(i,  249, 000 

136,630,000 

1,973,000 

1,(180,000 

6  100,000.000 


94,778,000 


1904. 


1905. 


Pounds. 

31,000,000 

3,000,000 

52,832,000 

6,000,000 

89,000 

d 13,228,000 

1,500,000 


107,649,000 


12,038,000  15,895,000 
99,228,000  134,507,000 
e 9, 000, 000        « 9, 000, 000 


121,106,000       159,462,000 


581,305,000 


11,266,000 

6,423,000 

363,000 

54,610,000 

83,111,000 

6  14,000,000 

11,052,000 

2,211,000 

6,0%,  000 

232,767,000 

2,358,000 

1,636,000 

d 71, 000, 000 


9,685,000 

19,060,000 

342,000 

57,466,000 

72,911,000 

6  14,000,000 

12,188,000 

1,771,000 

10,113,000 

222,785,000 

2,488,000 

1,706,000 

d  110,000,000 


14,047,000 
88,768,000 

e 9, 000, 000 


111,815,000 


13,983,000 

8,914,000 

6  340,000 

37,767,000 

75,797,000 

6  14,000,000 

13,464,000 

d  1,500,000 

3,999,000 

6  200,000,000 

2,380,000 

4,118,000 

d  90, 000, 000 


618,059,000       693,977,000 


450,000,000       450,000,000       4.50,000,000       450,000,000 


578,077,000 


736,000 
31,414,000 
44,512,000 


70,662,000 


336, 000 

57,958,000 
40,850,000 


163,000 

59,274,000 
50,721,000 


56,000 
44,991,000 
45,134,000 


105,144,000       110,158,000  |      90,181,000 


64,652,000 
904,000 


05,556,000 


69,029,000 
1,095,000 


70,124,000 


h  38, 600, 000         37,499,000 


630,818,000       662,767,000 


16,657,000 

« 00, 000 

h  5, 000, 000 

6,000 

4,271,000 

9  750, 000 


26,744,000 


18,863,000 

e  60, 000 

h  5, 000, 000 

26,000 

3,479,000 

9  750, 000 


28,178,000 


95,151,000 
1,010,000 


105,853,000 
222,000 


90,161,000       106,075,000 


h  35,900,000  I    h  33, 100,000 


692,219,000  |    679,356,000 


13,013,000 

e  60,000 

h  5,000,000 

.28,000 

4, 418, 000 

9 750, 000 


23,269,000 


12,492,000 

e  60,000 

5,309,000 

29,000 

2,907,000 

750, 000 


21,547,000 


Pounds. 

43,000,000 

3,000,000 

44,953,000 

6,000,000 

122,000 

6  10,000,000 

1,500,000 


108,575,000 


15,644,000 

6  112,000,000 

8,753,000 


136,397,000 


16,046,000 

8,080,000 

6  340, 000 

6  51,000,000 

70,277,000 

20,000,000 

6  12,400,000 

d  1,500,000 

8,694,000 

6  200,000,000 

2,086,000 

2,713,000 

d  100,000,000 


630,133,000 


450,000,030 


6  300,000 

65O,(!O0,00O 

6  45,000,000 


95,300,000 


105,853,000 
6  808,000 


100,661,000 


h 3S, 200, 000 


690,101,000 


6  15,000,000 

60,000 

h  5, 000, 000 

13,000 

2,023,000 

650,000 


23,346,000 


«  Estimated  from  official  data  of  acreage. 

6  Average  production. 

c  Exports. 

'!  Unofficial  estimate. 


e  Official  estimate  for  1905. 

/Including  Asiatic  Turkey. 

g  Official  estimate  for  1901. 

A  Estimated  from  returns  for  census  year. 


STATISTICS    OF    TOBACCO. 

Tobacco  crop  of  countries  named,  1901-1905 — Continued. 


607 


Country. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

OCEANIA. 

Australia: 

Pounds. 
452,000 

21  o.OOO 
35,000 

Pounds. 
055,000 
221,000 
39,000 

Pounds. 

204,000 
292,000 

S", (mo 

Pounds. 
09, 000 
596,000 
95,080 

Pounds. 
798,000 

125,000 

Total    Australian    Com- 
monwealth. 

700,000 

915,000 

583, 000 

700,000 

1,485,888 

Fiji                  

47,000 

56,000 

74,000 

58,008 

1,000 

747,000 

971,000 

057,000 

818,000 

1,480,000 



2,270,213,000 

2,375,772,000 

2,402,247,000 

2,134,227,000 

2,175,193,000 

Acreage,  production,  and  value  of  tobacco  in  the  United  Slates  in  190G,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


New  Hampshire. 

Vermont 

Massachusetts. . 

Connecticut 

New  York 

Pennsylvania. . . 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia.. . 
North  Carolina . . 
South  Carolina . . 

Georgia 

Florida 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

"Wisconsin 

Missouri 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alai>ama 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas 

Arkansas 


United  States 790,099 


Acreage. 


Acres. 

120 

199 

4,712 

14,140 

7,074 

26,000 

29,540 

108,971 

4,005 

120,358 

13,400 

3,000 

5,400 

70,000 

12,000 

1,075 

39,000 

1,498 

290,000 

43,400 

511 

150 

61 

535 

914 


yield  per 
acre. 


Pounds. 

1,785 

1,700 

1,750 

1,735 

1,250 

1,375 

600 

675 

780 

5S0 

670 

675 

S75 

1,060 

915 

820 

1,275 

730 

870 

785 

510 

440 

475 

550 

695 


857.2 


Production. 


rounds. 

224,910 

338,300 

8,246,000 

24,532,900 

8,842,500 

35,750,000 

17,724,000 

73,555,425 

3,123,900 

69,807,640 

8,978,000 

2,025,000 

4,725,000 

74,200,000 

10,980,000 

881,500 

49,725,000 

1,093,540 

252,300,000 

34,009,000 

260,610 

60,000 

28,975 

294,250 

656,080 


682,42S,530 


Average 

farm 

price, 

Dec.  1. 


Cents. 

17.0 

17.0 

18.5 

18.0 

13.8 

13.7 

6.8 

8.2 

9.2 

10  0 

10  5 

30.0 

35.0 

11.5 

6.8 

7.0 

13.5 

9.0 

7.7 

7.5 

22.0 

28.8 

27.5 

24  0 

12.0 


10.0 


Farm 
value, 
Dec.  1. 


Dollars. 

3S.235 

57,511 

1,525,510 

4,415,922 

1,220,265 

4,897,750 

1,205,232 

6,031,545 

287,399 

6,9S0,764 

942, 690 

607,500 

1,653,750 

S, 533,000 

740,640 

61,705 

6,712,875 

98, 419 

19,427,100 

2,555,175 

57,334 

19,008 

7,968 

70,620 

78,730 


68,232,647 


Acreage,  production,  and  value  of  tobacco  in  tlie  United  States,  1900-1906. 


Acreage. 


Average 

yield 
per  acre. 


Production. 


Average 
farm 

price  per 
pound 
Dec.  1. 


Farm  value 
Dec.  1. 


1900 
190 1 
1902 
1903 
1904 
1905 
1900 


A eres. 

1,046,427 

1,039, 199 

1.030,734 

1,037,735 

806, 409 

776,112 

796,099 


Pounds. 
778.0 
788.0 
797.3 
786.3 
819.0 
815.6 
857.2 


Pounds. 
S14.345.341 
818, 953, 373 
821,823,9(3 
815,972,425 
660, 460, 739 
633,033,719 
682, 428, 530 


Cents. 
6.6 
7.1 
7.0 
6.8 
8.1 
8.5 
10.0 


Dollars. 
53,661,132 
5S,  283, 108 
57,563,510 
55, 514, 627 
53, 382. 959 
53,519,068 
68,232,647 


608 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


:tional  tradi  in   unmanufactured  tobacco.  : 
EXPORTS. 


Countrv. 


J  Year  be- 
ginning— 


Algeria 

.-Hungary Jan. 

Jan. 



Bulgaria 

Jan. 



Patch  East  Indies 

Jan. 

July 

[lands 

Philippine  Islands 

K  ussia 

Turkey  * Mar. 

United  Stat  - July 

Other  countries 


Total .  "  45        -       -      . 


IMP' 


ina Jan. 

lia Jan. 

Austria-Hungary Jan. 

Belgium 

British  India Apr. 

Canada July 

Denmark Jan. 

Egypt Jan. 

Finland Jan. 

France Jan. 

Germany  ' Jan. 

Italy. . ." Jan. 

Jan. 

;■" Jan. 

Portugal Jan. 

Jan. 

E  Jan. 

.Kingdom Jan. 

- July 

Other  countries 


tend      "  H 

»  Preliminary  Ggni 


c  Average.  1901-1904. 

d  Exports  :'  ...     lata. 


e  Not  including  free  ports. 


B 


Hop  crop 

[Excluding  Canada,  for  which  the  census  o:     -  .  .ction  during  the  preceding  year  of  1.001.303 

pounds.    Other  omitted  countries  are  of  very  small  production.] 


Country. 


1902. 


XOETH  AKEEICA. 

Pa 

5.SO0.000 

California 10, 335, 000 

I      g  ai 

.ington 

Total  United  States 39.000.000 


j  made. 
9.000.000 
10. 920. 000 
17.550.0011 

•-■       ■ 


.r  i ..  i  i  i 


T    ,  . 


11.SSO.000  9.300.000 

.     -     000  14.235.000 

000  22.191,000 

7.410.009  9.750.000 


■     -    "    OO         49.  125    0 


12  rno.000 


05.295,000 


e  Estimate  based  upon  reports  to  Oal  .erand  .American  Agriculturist. 


STATISTICS    OF    HOPS.  609 

Hop  crop  of  countries  named,  1902-1906 — Continued. 


Country. 

1902. 

1903. 

U04. 

1905. 

1906. 

EUROPE. 

Austria -Hungary: 

Pounds. 
19,829,000 

Pounds. 
9.010.000 
S08.000 

Pounds. 
19.598.000 
631.000 

Pounds. 
39.305.000 
b  700.000 

Pounds, 
a  17,100,000 

Hungary 

631.000 

al,600,000 

Total  Austria-Hungary...  20,460,000 

Belgium 7. 360. 000 

Franco 5, 251, 000 

Germany 50. 185. 000 

Netherlands 137. 000 

Russia 11,000.000 

United  Kingdom:  England 34.S37.000 

Total  Europe 129.230.000 

OCEANIA. 

Australian  Commonwealth: 

Victoria 252.000 

T.i  smania 651. 000 

New  Zealand 930,000 

Total  Oceania 1.833,000 

Grand  total 170, 063, 000 


9,818,000         20.229.000         40.005.000        o  18,700,000 


4,786,000 

7.311.000 

46.562.000 

100.000 

12,500.000 

47,160.000 


9.830.000 

7.  753. 000 
49.136,000 

a  158.000 

8,  700. 000 
31.621.000 


1lN.237.0OO   127.427.000 


11.281.000 
10,970.000 
64.500.000 
6  158.000 
14,500.000 
77.946.000 


1.925.000 


2.289.000 


2.194.000 


171.457.000       178.841.000 


a5,000,000 
a6,000,000 
46,384.000 
6  158,000 
10.SOO.000 
27,517.000 


219.360.000         114,559,000 


176,000  274.000  I  162.000  c 216, 000 

S09.000  865,000  912.000  <"  809,000 

940,000  1.150.000  |         1.120,000  d, 035,000 


2,060,000 


277,090,000         1S1, 914,000 


o  Estimate  of  Gutermann  Sons.  Saaz,  Bohemia.  Aug.  28,  1906. 
b  Average,  1900-1903. 
=  Average,  1932-1905. 

International  trad*   in  hops,  I901-l906.a 

EXPORTS. 


Country. 


Year  be- 
gin- 
ning— 


1901. 


1902. 


1903 


Total 


Aust  ria-Hunga  rj 
Belgium 

France 

Germany  b 

Netherlands 

New  Zealand 

Russia 

United  Kingdom . . 

United  States 

Other  countries 


62, 452, 554 


IMPORTS. 


Australia Jan. 

Austria-Hungary Jan. 

Belgium Jan. 

British  India Lpr. 

Canada July 

Cape  of  Good  Hope Jan. 

Denmark Jan. 

France Jan. 

Germ  any  6 .'an. 

Netherlands Tan. 

Russia Jan. 

Sweden Jan. 

Switzerland Jan. 

United  Kingdom Jan. 

United  States I  July 

Other  countries 


1,230,459 

3,814,620 

460. 208 
789,598 

d  797, 700 
1.308,994 
4.  779. 155 

15. 390.  025 

2,822,020 

872, 016 

1,536,240 

938,949 

12.447.232 
2,805,293 
3, 123. 698 


1.140.3SS 
1,025,811 

4.427.816 

495. 824 

623.403 

848,  96(1 

1.300,617 

4,312,256 

6.004.068 

2, 996.  258 

945. 289 

1,401.343 

1.003.704 

20, 593. 888 

6,012,510 

2. 920, 344 


975. 658 
4.4S1.556 
6,478,233 

517.328 

781,822 

555 . 856 

1.401.037 

5.045.432 

2, 992. 995 

2.  742.  861 

807.085 

1. 430. 809 

1.012.142 

11,876,032 

2.758,163 

3.247.109 


913,830 

2, 109. 162 

4.826.301 

469,  728 

737,054 

4^7. 424 

1,359,  149 

4. 428. 343 

5. 346. 20S 

4.020,148 

1.363.547 

1,298.174 

1,168,891 

34.437.312 

4.339.379 

2.453,  77S 


Total ( 53.724.6S3     56,112.539     47,110,118     69.758,428 


1.279.362 

l.ls7.1.vj 

6,617,221 

448, 224 

1. 0LX1.265 

308,112 

1,378,660 

3. S79, 328 

9.047.989 

3,368.742 

1,191.722 

1.662.563 

1.347.6*5 

11,147,584 

10,113.989 

c 1,755, 691 


55,754,326 


a  See  "General  note,"  p.  546. 
3    a  1906 39 


b  Not  including  free  ports.        e  Preliminary.        d  Estimated. 


610  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

WhoUsaU  price*  of  hop*  per  pound  in   hading  cities  of  the   '  190S-1906. 


New  York.  Cincinnati. 


Chicago. 


Date. 


January. .. 

Mar-'. 



May 



Aug. 

mber. 

mber. 


I 

1 1 

April 


May. 

June 

July 

Aug. 


■  ry . . . 

March 



May 



July 

Aug  i 

:aber. 

: 


Jane  . 

iarv.. 

... .. 





Juie 

July 


January... 

;j'ry_. 
Marc  b 

April 

May 





Aug- 

September. 

Octo: 

mber. 


1904. 


1905. 


Pacific  coast. 

State. 

Ch 

common  to 

choice. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

High. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

14 

16 

14} 

m 

14 

• 

" 

15 

16 

" 

19 

-\ 

13 

- 

20 

15 

18 

22 

19J 

15 

20 

20J 

211 

21! 

15 

20 

- 

. 

23 

23 

20 

22 

24i 

28 

25 

22 

25 

26 

- 

261 

. 

25 

26 

- 

37 

- 

29! 

26 

29 

■15 

- 

30 

30 

26 

30 

' 

■ 

30 

31 

Good  to  choice. 

' 

" 

29 

29 

23 

31 

33 

' 

29 

- 

-" 

31 

30 

35 

29| 

25 

29 

23 

30 

25 

25 

20 

25 

23 

24 

29 

25 

20 

24 

22| 

-- 

24 

24 

22 

J4 

20| 

23* 

24 

24 

19 

22 

20* 

- 

24 

24 

21 

25 

24i 

30 

-' 

25 

26 

28 

30 

33 

26 

26 

20 

a 

30 

_ 

26 

26 

24 

26 

35 

27 

23 

24 

27 

u 

1 

:- 

31 

28! 

34 

36 

38 

31 

34 

30 

35 

38 

30 

32 

32 

34 

33 

36 

30 

32 

30 

34 

33 

35 

- 

31 

30 

35 

32 

" 

29 

30 

30 

_ 

32 

34 

29 

30 

30 

31 

. 

35 

29 

X 

30 

34 

33 

37 

29 

31 

28J 

31 

35 

41 

31 

36 

30 

35! 

36 

41 

36 

" 

32 

37 

■ 

38 

34 

36 

33 

" 

- 

37 

33 

33 

30 

34 

30 

36 

. 

31! 

. 

30 

23 

31 

26 

30 

23 

29 

29 

- 

26 

29 

a 

29 

29 

29 

26 

28 

26 

! 

28 

28 

21 

25 

25 

23 

24 

20 

24 

22 

- 

23 

22 

18 

23 

30 

23 

m 

15 

18 

19 

23 

17 

17 

10 

15 

13 

22 

14* 

14J 

12 

15 

16 

21 

13J 

13* 

10 

14 

15 

19 

13 

14! 

12 

14 

14 

17 

13 

14| 

10 

14 

13 

:. 

14 

9 

14 

- 

15 

12 

17 

10 

17 

11 

15 

12 

15 

15 

11 

14 

12 

15 

14 

12 

" 

12 

17! 

10 

17 

15 

17 

17 

18 

12 

18 

15 

" 

14 

18 

12 

22 

__ 

25 

17 

- 

14 

18 

23 

25 

171 

■ 

13 

18 

21 

24 

17» 

12 

18 

STATISTICS    OF    FLAXSEED. 


611 


FLAXSEED. 

Flax  crop  of  countries  named,  1903-1905. 
[Substantially  the  crop  of  the  world.]  . 


Country. 

Seed.                                                          Fiber. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

1903. 

1904.                   1D05. 

XOKTU   AMERICA. 

United  States 

Bushels. 
27,301,000 

Bushels. 
23,401,000 

Bushels. 
28,  ■! 

round-. 

1 
Pounds            rounds. 

Canada : 

605, 000 

295,000 

8,000 

479,000 

171.000 

5,000 

337.000 

411.000 

9,000 

1 " 

Saskatchewan 

Alberta 

Total  Canada 

908, 000 

655.000 

757, 000 

49,000 

188,000 

150,000 

Total    North 
America 

28, 258, 000 

2-1.244.000 

29.385,000 

SOUTH   AMERICA. 

Argentina 

Uruguay 

30, 070, 000 
8,  176,000 

36,912,000 
5,  530, 000 

29,133,000 
6, 000, 000 

Total     South 
America 

38. 252. 000 

42, 442, 000 

35,133.060 

EUROPE. 

Austria-Hungary: 

Austria 

1,120,000 

276, 000 

44.000 

2,000 

1,162,000 

188,000 

27. 000 

3,000 

1,370.000 

190,000 

2'.),  000 

3,000 

103,848,000 

30, 348, 000 

13,205.000 

1,896,000 

105.  850.  000 

19,777.000 

'.'.214,000 

1,727,000 

Hungary  proper 

Croatia -Slavonia  . .. 
Bosnia-Herzegovina 

123, 127,000 

19,000,000 

9,000,000 

1,428,000 

Total    A  u  stria  - 
Ilungarv 

1,442,000 

1,380,000 

1,592,000 

149,297,000 

136,568,000 

152,555,000 

Belgium..  . 

272,000 
350. 000 
544,000 

300,000 
36,000 

008, 000 

280,000 

2,000 

575, 000 

24. 790. 000 
0  20,000,000 

43,587,000 
19,327  000 

41.917.1  'i' 
IS.  497.000 
12.267,000 

27,385,000 
« 2, 000, 000 
52,445,000 
20,924.000 
41,917.000 
22,348,000 

=^  = 

Bulgaria 

25,534,000 

France. . . 

173,000 

Ireland 

45,515.000 
24,353,000 
41,917,000 
IS,  4-10.000 

Italy'- 

Netherlands 

Roumania 

362,000 

2, 064. 000 

469.000 
169,000 

437, 000 
335, 000 

Russia: 

Russia  proper 

Poland 

17,269.000 
728. 000 
513.000 

IS, 284. 000 
649,000 
471,000 

17,000,000 
600, 000 
500,000 

957,807,000 

46,  434.  060 

104.800,000 

1,095,606,000 

37,867,000 
33, 331, 0(H) 

1,000,000,000 

Northern  Caucasia  <' 

35, 000, 000 
60,000,000 

Total    Russia 

(European). 

18,510,000 

19,404,000 

18.100.000 

1.108.441.600 

1,106,804,000 

1.005.000.000 

Sweden  d 

39,000 

37,000 

37, 000 

1.032.000 
2.241,000 

1,209.000 
2,070,000 

905,000 

2,000,000 

Total  Europe 

23,583,000 

22. 393, 000 

21,35S,000 

1,441.396,000 

{,  476,963,000 

1.409,297,000 

ASIA. 

British  India,  including 
native    States  where 
reporting 

19, 263, 000 

22.S73.000 

13,896,000 

Russia: 

Central  Asia... 

325,000 

709,000 

156.000 
630. 000 

200.000 
600, 000 

12,722,000 

3S.2' 

'.'.  071.000 
33.111.000 

Siberia 

9,000.000 

35. 000. 000 

Total    Russia 
(Asiatic) 

1,034.000 

786, 000 

800,000 

50, 987. 000 

42,182.000 

44,000,000 

Total  Asia 

20,297.000  |  23,659.000 

14,696,000 

50.987.000 

42, 1S2.000 

44.000,000 

AFRICA. 

65, 000 

36.000 

:;:,  Ron 

'         1 



Grand  total 

10,  455, 000 

12,774,000 

00,607,000   ] 

,492,383,000 

,519,145,000 

1,453,297,000 

a  Estimated. 

t>  Average  1892-1895. 


c  Includes  government  of  Chcrnomorsk. 
d  Includes  small  quantity  of  hemp. 


612 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OP    AGRICULTURE. 


.    odiuiion.  and  .  the  United  Stat-  by  States. 


State  or  Territorv. 


Acreage. 


Average 

yield  per 

acre. 


Production. 


Average 
farm 
price. 

Dec.  1. 


Farm  value, 
Dec.  1. 










I 
I  •  I 
-^. 

M  :z:a.na 

Idaho 






Acres. 
0 
431.045. 
- 

- 
L,  465,745 

'    0 
281 

24  ■"' 
If. 421 
2,048 

1.042 


2,50c     27 


BusheU. 
14.0 
11.0 
11.4 
7.3 
9.9 
10.5 
•    " 

12.0 

. 
12.0 
12.0 


n. 


Bush-els. 
546,  000 

4.741.525 
--■ 

_   S     . 
■    ' 

"     ■ 
141,015 
533.000 

50.272 
298,26 
--■    » 

24. 576 

12. 504 


Cents. 
104 
103 
95 
93 
102 
100 
95 
88 
95 
100 
85 
125 
125 


25.576.140 


101.3 


Dollars. 

-■  -  m 

4,883,774 

216.600 

243. 684 

14.801.094 

3.979.500 

133,964 

469.040 

47.758 

298.260 

211,301 

30,720 

15, 630 


25.899.165 


Who'.  faxseed  per  bushel  in  hading  cities  of  tht  United  States,  1902-1906. 


Cincinnati. 


Chicago. 


Date. 


I 

-  -   ~ '   ' : 

Mr.  r. 
M-sy 

- 

;-:  :-:  ~    ~r 
•'.•-'::   -r 
V  :  v -m  ■  *; 


Frime- 


No.  l. 


Low.      Hint. 


High. 


Low.      High. 


January 

Hu 

lb  f 

fine 

I 

j 
- 

I 
N  rem 

B 

ri 

[ 

-     -" 

l 

^  -:--r_  : ■:  r 


;  •- 
1.63 
1.63 
1.65 

I   '■ 

1.54 

1.36 

1.37 

1.251 

1.15 

1.13 

H 

1.14 

1.12 

1.06 

1.06 

I     • 

• 

.90 

.93 

.94 

.» 

.90 

.902. 

.*a 

1.09 

1.07| 

.991 

.99| 

1.00" 

1.02 

1.151 

1.09 

1.07 

1.08 

1.11 

1.15 
1.15 
1.23 
1.23 
1.25 
1.25 
2! 
LOl 

.92 
.93 

o  Ko.  1  Northwestern. 


$1.30 

$1.40 

1.30 

1.40 

1.30 

1.40 

1.30 

1.40 

1.30 

1.40 

a 

1.35 

1.30 

1.40 

1.2-5 

1.30 

1.2-5 

1.2-T 

1.25 

1.25 

1.2-5 

1.25 

1.25 

:  25 

1.30 

1.30 

1.30 

. 

1.30 

1.30 

1.10 

1.30 

1.00 

1.10 

1   1 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

.  1 

1.00 

1.09 

LOO 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

:   i 

1.00 

:    i 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 

1.00 



1.00 

1.10 

1.10 

1.10 

l.M 

1.10 

1.10 

1.10 

SI.  73 

1.74 
1.74 

.  a 

1.79 
1.76 
1.74 
1.55 
1.46 

1.23 
1.25 

1.24 
1.22 

1.17 
1.12 
1.171 
1.14* 

:    -. 

1.05" 

1.09 

1.031 

1.00" 

1.021 

1.19 
1.184 

1.16" 

1.16 

1.09  J 

LOB 

1.24 

1.26! 

1.28 

1.18 

1.194 

1.26 

1.23 

1.35 

1.391 

1.40" 

1.47 

1.47 

1.44 

1.35 

1.12 

1.03 

1.00 

1.13 


Milwaukee. 


Low.       High. 


?1.61 
1.66 

• 
1.74 
1.76 
1.73 
1.43 
1.40 
1.25 
1.19 

■ 
1.20 

1.21 
1.16 
1.00 
1.09 
1.11 
1.01?. 

.95] 

.97 

.99 

.94" 
•97! 

1.03?. 

1.16 

1.13 

1.06 

LOSS 

1.061 

1.07" 

'    - 

1.241 

1.141 

1.15! 

I    I 

(°) 
1.21 
1.22 
l!35! 
1.37" 
1.39 
1.43 
1.34 
1.12 

• 

- 

.99 

LOO 


51.73 

1.73 

'  - 

1.80 

1.79 
1.76 
1.74 
1.55 
1.45 

a 

1.23 
1.25 

1.24 
1.22 

1.17 

1.111 

1.171 

1.14" 

1.021 

1 .  05" 

1.09 

1.04 

1 .  00 

1.01! 

1.19 
1.18! 
1.16! 
1.141 
1.10' 

• 
1.24" 
1.26! 

. 
1.18* 
1.191 
1.26 

1.23 

1.23* 

1.39* 

1.40 

1.47 

1.47 

1.44 

1.35 

1.12 

1.03 

1.00 

1.16 


Duluth. 


Low.       High. 


$1.56! 
1.65" 
1.65 
1.72 
1.70 
1.60 
1.35 
1.35 
1.24! 
1.15  J 
1.15| 
1.16 

1.14! 
1.11* 
1.07| 

1.101 

.991 

.95" 

.961 

.99 

.92 

.93! 

.95" 

1.01! 
1.13| 

1.14" 
1.05! 
1-051 

1.071 
1.09  \ 
1.23 
1.161 
1.131 
1.14" 
1.15 

1.23 

1.241 

1.35" 

1.39 

1.40 

1.47! 

1.45" 

1.30 

.9"! 

.96} 

.98} 

.9S' 


$1,711 
1.72 
1.74 
1.78 

n 

1.761 

1.66 

1.50 

1.47 

1.27* 

1.20 

1.21J 

1.20 

1.161 

1.131 

1.11 

1.16 

1.13 

l.OOi 

1.011 

1.09 

1.02| 

1.00 

1.00 

1.17 
1.17 
1.15J 

1.15f 

1.08 

1.091 

1.24 

1.261 

1.28 

1.171 

L18f 

1.25| 

1.24 

1.381 

1.401 

1.42 

1.48 

1.50 

1.4S 

1.48 

1.30 

1.00 

l.OOf 

1.16 


STATISTICS    OF   KICE. 


613 


Wholesale  prices  of  flaxseed  per  bushel  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906 — 

Continued. 


Date. 


1906. 

January 

February . . . 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September.. 

October 

November. . 
December. . 


St.  Louis. 


Prime. 


Low.     High. 


SI.  06 
1.06 
1.05 
1.08 
1.05 
1.05 
1.03 
1.02 
.98 
1.03 
1.0S 
1.15 


51.16 
1.11 
1.09 
1.11 
1.08 
1.06! 
1.07" 
1.05 
1.02! 
1.07 
1.17 
1.19 


Cincinnati. 


$1.10 
1.10 
1.10 
1.10 
1.12 
1.12 
1.12 
1.12 
1.12 
1.12 
1.12 
1.12 


High. 


$1.12 


Chicago. 


No.  1  North- 
western. 


Low. 


$1.06 
1.06 
1.04  j 
1.06 
1.06! 
1.07" 
1.05 
1.055 
1.03 
1.04J 
1.075 
111.4 


High. 


SI.  2.5 
1.164 
1.14* 
1.165 
1.17 
1.13 
1.125 
1.14 
1.13 
1.15 
1.22 
1.234 


Milwaukee. 


No.  1  North- 
western. 


Low. 


$1,124 
1.10" 
1.11 
1.12 
1.124 
1.11 
1.05 
1.10 
1.0S 
1.09! 
1.13* 
1.174 


High. 


$1.25 
1.17 
1.14 
1.18 
1.15J 
1.134 
1.124 
1.14" 
1.145 
1.131 
1.204 
1.22 


Duluth. 


Low. 


$1,115 

1.103 

1-10| 

1.14  J 

1.124 

1.11? 

1.11J 

1.12 

1.09* 

1.111 

1.14| 

1.181 


High. 


$1.24 
1.161 
1.17J 
1.20 
1.18 
1.141 
1.14* 
1.171 
1.175- 
1.15| 
1.25f 
1.224. 


RICE. 

Rice  crop  of  countries  named,  1901-1905. 

[Mostly  cleaned  rice.  China,  which  is  omitted,  has  a  roughly-estimated  crop  of  50,000,000,000  to 
60,000,000,000  pounds.  Other  omitted  countries  are  Afghanistan,  Algeria,  Brazil,  Colombia,  Feder- 
ated Malay  States,  Madagascar,  Persia,  Russia  (Asiatic),  Trinidad  and  Tobago,  Turkey  (Asiatic 
and  European),  Venezuela,  and  a  few  other  countries  of  small  production.] 


Country. 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

NORTH  AMERICA. 

United  States: 

Contiguous 

Pounds, 
a  388, 0O0, 000 
b 33, 400, 000 

Pounds. 
1319,400,000 
b 33,  400, 000 

Pounds. 
a560,800,000 
6  33, 400, 000 

Pounds. 
586,000,000 
b  33, 400, 000 

Pounds. 
378,000,000 
b 33, 400, 000 

Noncontiguous — Hawaii 

Total  United   States 
(except     Philippine 
Islands) 

421,400.000 

352,800,000 

594,200,000 

019, 400, 000 

411,400,000 

Central  America: 

300,000 
8, 100, 000 
41, 800, 000 

700,000 
d 8, 100, 000 
40,000,000 

1,000,000 
d  8, 100, 000 
48, 700, 000 

1,300,000 
d  8, 100.000 
62,000,000 

c  1,300, 000 

c  62, 000, 000 

Total  North  America. 

471,600,000 

401,600,000 

652,000,000 

690, 800, 000 

482,800,000 

"SOUTH  AMERICA. 

e 2, 000, 000 

29,300.000 

800, 000 

00,000,000 

e  2, 000, 000 

22,800.000 

800,000 

60,000,000 

e 2, 000, 000 

•24,500,000 

1,000.000 

60,000,000 

t 2, 000, 000 

31,200,000 

1,900,000 

00,000,000 

e  2, 000, 000 
32,800,000 
e  1,900, 000 

CO  000  000 

British  Guiana 

Dutch  Guiana 

Peru 

Total  South  America  . 

92,100,000 

85,600,000 

87, 500, 000 

95,100,000 

96, 700, 000 

EUROPE. 

600, 000 
/ 9, 900, 000 
670, 300, 000 
382,900,000 

700,000 

79,900, 000 
668,400,000 
359,800,000 

600,000 

9, 800, 000 

761,400,000 

417,100,000 

700, 000 

12.  200,  000 

760,500,000 

394, 000, 000 

800,000 

10,800,000 

676,600,000 

478, 600, 000 

Bulgaria 

Italy 

Spain 

1,063,400,000 

1,038,800,000 

1,188,900,000 

1,168,000,000 

1,166,800,000 

ASIA. 

British  India:  <7 

British  Provinces 

62, 153, 000, 000 
h 711, 000, 000 

72,688,000,000 
h  799, 000, 000 

68, 580, 000, 000 
h  838, 000, 000 

71,561,000,000 
h 764, 000, 000 

69,927,000,000 
c 764, 000, 000 

Total  British  India... 

62,864,000,000 

73,487,000,000 

69, 418, 000, 000 

72,325,000,000 

70,691,000,000 

a  Commercial  movement. 

6  Census  1899.  ■ 

«  Figures  for  previous  year  used. 

d  1901  figures  used. 

c  Unofficial  estimate. 


/1899  figures  used. 

g  Figures  for  British  India  refer  to  crop  years 
beginning  in  the  spring  of  the  calendar  years  men- 
tioned in  this  table. 

h  Estimated  from  official  returns  for  acreage. 


t>14 


YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEFAETMEXI    OF    AGEICULIV 


Rice  crop  of  countries  named.  1901-1905. — Continue!. 


Country. 

ML 

1902.                     1903. 

N  1 

;•■:•. 

-oontinoed- 

Pound*. 
■96,300,000 

-.  nc  oa  n 

Pound*.              7 

.•J.000 
c  5,  000, 000, 000 d  5. 000, 000, OOOt 

J  ■  :-. 

to,  000, 000. 000 

Pound*. 

:■■-.■•' 

■    ;.;,.    .,      ... 

?e  Empire: 
Formosa 

11. 533. 200.000'   14. 512.  GOO.  000 
-  296.  GOO.  000 

if  •:>•"  goi  jot 
.  —  :  •.  ..... 

n,M^ooo,  no 

^2,598,100,000 

Total  Japanes 

-    ■•,-.. 

300,000;  16. 309. 200.  V.O 

IS,  658.700,000 

:-.   '  .»   ■"■     ■  " 

I  Madura 

Korea 

PhiliDp.r.                     



'    «:.ooo.ooo 

<*3. 400, 000. 000 
<*3.  COO,  000. 000 

-    ;:;    ;,;.      ..        |    -      .,      ,, 

i3,3oo,oo(  oc  *  i  no,  no,  n 

......    ....      ■  m   .,'    ■;. 

95.000.000 

544,0- 

3.300.000.000 
•  95.000.000        £95.000,000 

Total  Asia 

97. 794,300.000  105,  r~     -                             SOO.  000  110.2                                     '30.000 

AFRICA. 

'■?ntral  Africa 



- 

.  200.000> 

«20,000.000        '20,000,000, 

2.200.000;         /2,200,000 
<r  20,000,000 

-.200,000 

-.  .  ■              _•-  :■:>:   ■■ 

..   .  ■ 



','•*..-  r.i    .:. 

■  1,300,000 

100.000 

=  3.000.000 

a3.OCO.000          13.000.000 
(>J> 

Total  Oceania 

-       '•          M 

3.500,000               :>•:   .... 

3,030.000 

•--:,:•■    ••  ::■    .    >•:  :•-.  :.■■  ?;:  -..>    ....  . 

02. 191. 300.  000  106- 129.  Iflft.  ODD 

- 
-  .res  for  previous  yes.r: 
<  rnoraci&i  estimate. 

1  from  official  returns  of  exports  of 
this  country,  and  from  per  capita  consumption  of 
rice  in  Japan,  including  food,  seed  and  waste  bet 
not  including  rice  used  for  sake,  for  1394-1903  (270 
pounds  per  aim  am 


5  is.  1902. 

_      -  :_  ."   ■-.    :>       :--.".-. 


oduction.  and  i  ;jf  United  Slat<s  in  1906.  by  States. 


North  Carolina. 
South  ' 

Georgia 

Florida 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas . . 
Arkansas 


|  Average 
r     acre. 


farm       Farm  value, 
price,  Dec  1. 

Dec.  1. 


Acres. 

Bushels. 

Z  -      -• 

Cent*,    i 

DoOot*. 

668 

28.9 

19,305 

18.3(0 

to,  » 

22.0 

■    -  2 

: 

- 

23.0  1 

•    :  ..- 

95 

• :  --  - 

. 

35.0 

100  i 

52  "  - 

23.0 

:  '  ■ 

100 

■      :■, 

20.0 

"«.• 

28.0  ' 

8,631.556 

i    " 

234,  I3i 

36.0 

v536 

"  ■ 

. 

31.0 

131,440 

- 


STATISTICS    OF    RICE. 
Wholesale  prices  of  rice  per  pound.  1902-1906. 


615 


Date. 


1902 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1903 

January   

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1904 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1905 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1906 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 


New  York. 

Cincinnati. 

Lake  Charles. 

New  Orleans. 

Houston. 

Domestic 
(good). 

Prime. 

Rough. 0 

Honduras, 

cleaned. 

(Head  rice.) 
cleaned. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

/'.Ills. 

Dolls. 

Dolls. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

Cents. 

41 

41 

5i 

fig 

1.75 

3.00 

2J 

51 

31 

5i 

n 

4| 

64 

1.75 

3.00 

2 

6 

31 

51 

n 

41 

54 

2 

6 

4 

54 
51 
5i 

54 

H 

>1 

54 

6| 

6.J 

2 

- 

4 

'■; 

5 

] 

2 

5| 

4 

« 

53 

54 

6i 

14 

6 

4 

41 

53 

5J 

61 
6  j 

H 
If 

64 

4 

54 
54 

41 

'1 

5J 

5  J 

4 

4* 

•  4 

:,.'. 

6J 

2.00 

3.40 

l| 

■">; 

44 

51 

4* 

4 

53 

51 

1.90 

3.25 

11 

51 

44. 

51 

41 

41 

53 

51 

2.00 

3.20 

11 

6A 

44 

51 

5             5 

53 

51 

1.75 

3.30 

11 

63 

44 

5! 

41           5 

43 

•53 

1.75 

3.40 

1; 

6i 

44 

5| 

5            5 

41 

5} 

1.75 

3.40 

1J 

63 

4  4 

6 

54J          5i 

41 

53 

1.75 

3.40 

11 

6| 

■i\ 

6 

53           53 

41 

53 

U 

64 

44 

44 

51 

53           51 

4f 

2| 
23 

64. 

53 

5| 

41 

53 

5J 



6| 
64 

4'. 

6 

53 

5| 

41 

2i 

4^ 

6& 

5| 

5! 

4f 

53 

2i 

6 

4? 

6} 

4* 

5* 

41 

5J 

2.00 

3.60 

21 

5§ 

41 

6i 

44 

41 

41 

5* 

1.75 

3.60 

1| 

5| 

41 

63 

43 

41 

41 

54 

1.60 

3.25 

1* 

5J 

43 

5* 

44 

*3 

41 

5J 

1.50 

3.00 

13 

0 

4 

5 

43 

43 

4? 

•5} 

• 
1.50 

3.00 

14 

41 

31 

4| 

4 

4 

4! 

53 

1.50 

2.75 

I1, 

4f 

34 

11 

4 

4 

44 

5 

1.25 

2.50 

n 

41 

34 

41 

4 

4 

43 

4i 

1.25 

2.25 

1* 

43 

34. 

43 

»i 

4 

4J 

41 

1.25 

2.00 

11 

4| 

33 

4 

3jj 

3? 

H 

41 

1.25 

2.00 

1* 

4 

33 

4 

3* 

31 

31 

4J 

1.2.3 

2.00 

Is 

43 

3 

4 

3$ 

3? 

3i 

41 

1.25 

2.00 

13 

53 

3 

4 

3* 

3§ 

31 

4i 

1.25 

2.00 

11 

4] 

3 

4 

■4 

31 

33 

43 

1.10 

2.00 

13 

0 

3 

31 

3? 

31 

r4 

43 

1.10 

2.00 

11 

5i 

3 

31 

31 

n 

H 

If 

LOO 

2.00 

1A 

53 

3 

31 

31 

31 

33 

43 

1.00 

2.00 

li.          5J 

3 

31 

3* 

31 

3? 

43 

1.00 

2.00 

1 

4! 

3 

31 

3* 

35 

3 

4 

LOO 

2.35 

1A 

4| 

3 

31 

31 

31 

3 

4 

1.00 

2.25 

i^ 

n 

3 

34 

31 

34 

44 
5 

LOO 

il 

4', 

3 

34 

31           31 

4 

1.00 

2.50 

2i 

5 

3 

31 

3|           3| 

4 

5 

LOO 

2.50 

2J 

41 

3 

4 

3||          3* 

4 

5 

1.25 

3.00 

11 

53 

3 

43 

3? 

4 

4 

5 

2.00 

3.25 

11 

58 

3 

43 

41 

4; 

4 

5 

2.00 

3.25 

2            53 

3 

41 

4; 

41 

4* 

5i 

2.00 

3.  75 

5| 

3 

5 

44 

41 

41 

53 

2.00 

3.S5 

2 

34 

5 

5 

5} 

41 

53 

2.-r> 

3.S5 

2|          51 

4 

51 

0 

53 

4i 

o3 

2.25 

3.S5 

2|  :        5J 

4 

51 

5 

5 

41 

5J 

2.25 

3.85 

2    1        51 

4 

51 

■H 

5 

41 

51 

n 
n 
21 

31 

4! 

5 

4» 

53 

6 

3^ 

5 

5 

53 

4| 

51 

53 

31 

53 

53 

54 

43 

51 

2J 

2 

5| 

31 

53 

53 

53 

41 

54 

2.50 

3.85 

6§ 

31 

53 

">4 

53 

4| 

51 

2.50 

3.85 

21 

51 

31 

53 

51 

54 

4? 

51 

2.25 

3.85 

24. 

5| 

li 

51 

5J 

5| 

41 

51 

2.25 

3.50 

2 

5| 

1'. 

51 

0 

53 

41 

54. 

2.00 

3.25 

11 

51 

4 

51 

a  Per  bsrrel  of  162  pounds. 


616 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Initrnational  trait  1901—1906.* 

[Mostly  cleaned  rice.] 

E  :>: . 


! 

g 


1903. 


Belgiam Jan.  1 

i  Jndia 

........ 

Formosa 

France Jan.  1 

French  Indo-China .. .  Jan.  1 

Jan.  1 

Netherlands Jan.  1 

Penacg Jan.  1 

Siam Jan.  1 

Singapore Jan.  1 


Pound*. 

-   -.53.573 
52     72     -    ■ 
•■     •      ." 
H     "3.252 
■ 
.     .i    ■•-  .  ■- 
...   53 

"     "       44 

.-•     J3.333 

1,534,231,467 

--       -      .. 

-       J7J    ,. 


Pounds. 

■ 

133  S 
""  235,338 

2.459.480.031 

22 ' 

2   23 
"      '. 
"-'  _ 

H     742,133 
521,922 


Pounds. 

5.054.477.904 

■• 

; 

1  770,569 

"4. 515 
223 

25     ""-   ■   i 
22     - 

£0,400 
57   • 


Pounds. 

1   ri4.036 

"       790, 144' 

105. 792. 310: 

197.154.447 

52.021.579 

.     a    790,0441 

■       2     '  - 

154,148,4001 

■   - 

"  .   571,733 

'••   125,000 


Pounds. 

764,979 

4,839,327,300 

•  582,964 

--     566,374 

54,091,776 

1.371. 

222   773,526 

11,808 

B3, 433 

■   ~~;6,800 

"        00,905 

-  -     15.000 


Total 9,098,009,53712,034,1  --  307, 134, 492 10, 216, 541, 441 


IMPORTS. 


Jan. 

Belgiam Jan. 



n 

China :..  Jan. 

Cuba Jan. 

Dutch  East  Indies. . .  Jan. 

Jan. 

Jan- 

Japar .  .* Jan. 

Mauritius. Jan. 

.-    ::.•  :.  -.'-.  .i .  "  .: 

_■    

Philippine  Islands Jan. 

Russia Jan. 

i.r..\.;     r *.-.::. 

-i  Kingdom Jan. 

I 

'  "      :::.:.•-- 


"   ""  ■ 

12       .  '" 

197.'!    •  775 

302.4--  .   • 

a  •• 

■■  . 
■ 

1 .  339.  493.  984 
7,567,92 
7.93 
.     .- 
414.    . 
142,25 

"43.370 
-  852  -  " 
i     . 

"43. 174 
1,341,867 

i       m  ■■■    ' 

'    '■  ■  - 

925,44: 


154. 
339. 

g 

■ 

445. 
601. 

. 
(39. 
138, 

1.040. 

169. 

970 


:.  " 

653.404 
632,  $29 
482   732 

420.533 
841,863 

"    ■ 
27      ; 

702.  495 
209  BOf 

__■ 
572   I  J 

345. 333 

-  i      77 

i 
3    ' 
'     - 
0 


162. 

- 

o 

- 

140, 

440. 

■ 
236, 

141. 
495. 
153, 

■ 

154. 
1.074. 


■-":- 

■•    2S3 

72 
!       22 

'  ■  '  ■ 
574. 339 
099.790 
159  745 
359.026 
.  '  --- 
654.000 
143.562 
"■• 

i 

-  '    ■ 

i 

221    772 


U 

I 
134. 

m 

143 

196, 
71 

104. 

." 
". 
252. 

157. 

n 

- 


403, 926, 

021,690 

259.008 
577.333. 
i  -  . 
382,  754 

• 
-• 
833,603 

- 
"   "  . 
778 

SSO.  567 
232,062 
"•"  0 
591,664 
483,515] 
744.000 


234. 

.    ■ 
<*129. 

297. 
el77, 

661. 

• 
414. 

23 

1.546. 

114. 
493. 

• 

d  160. 

e.982, 

85 

24 


525.043 
J  2 

413.516 

312. 992 
446, 016 

055,467 
727. 403 

979. 896 
854.789 
278,011 

121.733 
012.080 
955.916 
859.300 
411.974 
521.396 
300, 900 
939. 744 


Total -   "•      \       681     273  "        — '  935.752  10.540.049.565  9, 430 


- 


c  Average.  1901-1904. 
d  .Preliminary  figures. 


STATISTICS    OF    SUGAR. 
SUGAR. 


617 


Sugar  production  of  countries  named,  1902-3  to  1906-7. 


not  include  the  production  of  China,  Formosa,  Natal,  and  some  other  less  important  sugar-producing 


countries.] 


Country. 


Cane  Sugar. 
north  america. 

United  States: 

Contiguous- 
Louisiana 

Texas 

Noncontiguous — 

Hawaii 

Porto  Rico 

Total  United  States 
(except  Philippine 
Islands) 

Central  America: 

Guatemala 

Salvador 

Nicaragua 

Costa  Rica 

Mexico . . 

West  Indies: 

British- 
Antigua  and  St.  Kitts. 

Barbados 

Jamaica 

Trinidad .... 

Cuba 

Danish— St.  Croix 

French — 

Guadeloupe 

Martinique 

Haiti  and  Santo  Domingo.. 

Lesser  Antilles ' 

Total  North  America . ' 

SOUTH  AMERICA. 

Argentina 

Brazil '_.['■ 

British  Guiana ! " ! ! " 

Dutch  Guiana ... 

Peru ...[ 

Venezuela * ' " " 

Total  South  America  . 

EUROPE. 

Spain i 

ASIA. 

British  India  c 

Java 

Philippine  Isfcmds [[[.[.....< 

Total  Asia 


Tons,  a 
329, 220 
(») 

391,062 
85,000 


S05, 288 


8,000 
0,000 
4,500 
3,000 
112,679 


18,000 
38, 179 
18, 772 
42, 679 
998,878 
13,000 

38,  498 
29,035 
50,000 
12,000 


2,198,508 


130,000 
187,500 
121,570 
13,046 
123,906 
3,000 


579,022 


28,000 


1,906,784 
842, 812 
90,000 


2, 839, 596 


1903-4. 


Tons,  a 
215,000 
19,800 

328, 103 
130,000 


Tons,  a 
335, 000 
15,000 

380, 576 
145.000 


Tons,  a 
330,000 
12,000 

383, 225 
213.000 


692, 903 


7,040 
6,300 
4,235 
3,275 

107.547 


19,000 
58,081 
14,255 
44,058 
1,040,228 
13,000 

35,976 
23, 930 
47,000 
13,000 

, 130, 434 


142, 895 
197,000 
113,282 
13,000 
131,957 
3,000 


001,134 


2S,000 


1,871,980 

885, 561 

84,000 


2,841,547 


875. 570 


938,225 


7,040 
5,588 
4,235 
2,305 
107.038 


24,000 
41,600 
11,251 
31,000 
1,103,258 
11,000 

30,000 
29,980 
47,000 
13,000 

2, 410, 477 


0,795 
5,944 
4,400 
1,377 
107, 529 


24,000 
49, 804 
12,523 
55,000 
1.178.749 
13,000 

36,000 
42, 231 
55,000 
13, 000 

2,543,637 


128,104 
195,000 
101,278 
13,000 
150, 000 
3,000 


590,382 


18, 592 


137. 308 
275,000 
121,693 
13,000 
150, 000 
3,000 


700,001 


14,512 


2,169,000 

1,008,900 

106, 875 


3,284,775 


1 , 725, 300 
990, 994 
145, 525 


2,801,819 


1906-7. 


Tons,  a 
230,000 
13.000 

390, 000 
255,000 


8SS.0OO 


7,000 
6,000 
4,000 
2,000 
115,000 


24,000 
40,000 
15,000 
50, 000 
1,250,000 
13,000 

36,000 
40,000 
60,000 
13, 000 

2,563,000 


120,000 
200,000 
118,000 
13,000 
140,000 
3.000 


054,000 


15,000 


2,223,400 

1,011,540 

150, 500 


3,385,440 


1  ?T°ils  °f.2>2*°  Pounds,  except  beet  sugar  in  Europe,  which.is  in  metric  tons  of  2,204.022  pounds 

o  .Not  estimated. 

«  Official  estimates  for  such  parts  of  British  India  as  return  statistics  of  production. 


618  YEARBOOK    OF    THE   DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Sugar  production  of  countries  named.  1902-3  to  1906-7 — Continued. 


Countrv. 


1902-3. 


1903- 


1904-5. 


: 


Egypt.... 
Mauritius. 
Reunion.. 


Total  Africa 

OCEANIA. 

Australian  Commonwealth: 

Queensland 

New  South  Wales 

Fiji 


Total  Oceania . 


Total  cane-sugar  pro- 
duction  


Beet  - 
north  america. 


Unite  1 




Total  North  America. 

ErKOPE. 


Austria-Hungary . 

Belgium 

France 

Germany 

rlands 

Russia 

Other  cour.: 


Ton.-. 
■~  ■  I 
150.349 
39.624 


Tons. 
00.000 

25 
41.117 


Tons. 
60,000 
142.101 
30,000 


Tom. 
65.000  i 

30.  COO  I 


277.47: 


.     / 


232. 101 


- 


21.000 
35.503 


21.500 
50,000 


.     525 
47.000 


170.000 
20.000 


...  1,000 


55,725 


n 


6. 633. 333 


. 


; 


216.173 

■ 


279.393 
11.419 


201. 47S 


57       - 
224,090  I 

. 

102. 411 

25     -. 


1.167,959 
209,811 
804.308 

.     27     - 

1.206.907 

441.116 


i 

598,164 

136.551 


:-■■"■-: 
a  - 

1,089,684 

2.415.136 
-   1     - 

415.000 


Tom. 
60.000 
205.000 
30.000 


295,000 


24.000 
43.000 


: 


r,  161, 446 


11,367 


1,335.000 

755.000 
2.250.000 

190.000 
1.4.50.000 

440,000 


Total  Europe 

561, 257 

.333  | 

4. 70S.  700 

700, 000 

Total  beet-sugar  pro- 
duction.  

762, 73-5 

6.  HE 

4.932.907 

7.2:. 

7. 143. 163 

Total  cane  and  beet 
sugar 

12.1S9.017 

11.'  •■ 

67,794 

14.304.699 

STATISTICS    OF    SUGAK. 


619 


Quantity  and  value  of  sugar  imported  into  thf  United  States  from  the  principal  sources 

of  supply,  1902-1906. 


QUANTITY. 


Country  from  which  imported. 


Austria-Hungary. . 

Belgium 

Brazil 

British  Guiana 

British  West  Indies 

Canada 

Chinese  Empire 

Cuba 

Danish  West  Indies 
Dutch  East  Indies. 

Dutch  Guiana 

Egypt 

Germany 

Mexico 

Netherlands 

Peru 

Philippine  Islands. . 

Santo  Domingo 

United  Kingdom . . . 
Other  countries 

Total 


Imports  for  year  ending  June  30 — 


1902. 


Pounds. 

111,818,771 

479,655 

349,794,400 

181, 237, 759 

194,909,474 

2, 430, 647 

2, 397, 107 

984,216,925 

10,037,082 

636,710,315 

16,861,587 

59,557,384 

217, 872, 627 

338, 308 

8,967,942 

102,647,624 

11,424,000 

111,580,425 

11,125,330 

11,241,787 


1903. 


Pounds. 
40, 857, 724 


74, 159, 889 

172,361,345 

191,924,220 

6,285,045 

752, 2S5 

2,396,497,779 

41,205,950 

891,758,090 

15,722,225 

62, 348, 580 

91, 745, 860 

2, 414, 373 

200,000 

88,848,044 

18, 773, 333 

112,988.775 

119,739 

7,144.850 


1904. 


Pounds. 
3,525,512 


14,  ISO,  540 

73,  295, 0S9 

65,850, 114 

4,034,551 

4,602,045 

2,819,558,402 

20,  S37, 461 

440, 370, 139 

6,994,540 

22,222,552 

5,480.349 

1, 250, 252 


48,671,777 
61,670,614 
95,790,189 
70 
12,382,811 


1905. 


Pounds. 
2, 704. 200 
20,820,667 

49. 90S. 032 

56,015,487 

80,553,082 

2,153,019 

8,351,757 

2,057,684,109 

12,851,640 

899,  394, 575 

11,407.700 

2,590.230 

205.0S4.302 

24,049,489 


17.7S9.55S 

77,997,424 

109,111,209 

1,541,724 

10, 798, 632 


3,031,915,575    4,216, 108, 106   3.700,023,013   3,680.932,998 


1906. 


Pounds. 

1,676.257 

784,000 

28,  S77, 781 

50,930,124 

37,367,355 

51,246,131 

785, 422 

2,781,901,380 

17,233,750 

781,891,724 

2, 427, 536 


12, 480, 459 

3,540,984 


36,371.943 

69, 373, 602 

96, 845, 109 

2, 880,  490 

2.717.383 


3,979.331,430 


VALUE. 


Austria-Hungary. . . 

Belgium 

Brazil 

British  Guiana 

British  West  Indies. 

Canada 

Chinese  Empire 

Cuba 

Danish  West  Indies. 
Dutch  East  Indies.. 

Dutch  Guiana 

Egypt 

Germany 

Mexico 

Netherlands 

Peru. 


Philippine  Islands. 

Santo  Domingo 

United  Kingdom . . 
Other  countries 


Total. 


Dollars. 

2, 288, 547 

11,097 

4,908,735 

3.372,104 

3,226,575 

123, 441 

03,429 

18, 205, 411 

377.581 

12,325,518 

349, 242 

1.351,  OSS 

3.  597.2:14 

9,408 

232,963 

1,910,311 

L88.1S9 

2,001,977 

192,945 

204,872 

55,001,097 


Dollars. 

077, 830 


1,176.049 

3,333,032 

3. 136, 172 

256, 894 

13,640 

42,714,079 

705, 587 

13,251,810 

301,235 

1,014,831 

1,370,305 

103, 439 

4,888 

1,517,514 

270, 729 

2,107,428 

2,241 

131.258 

72,08S,973 


Dollars. 
80, 393 


200, 102 
1, 428, 433 
1,092,663 

196,633 

123,900 
50.547.403 
390,  384 
7,409,996 
134,902 
415, 551 
117,410 
35,998 


S00,605 

884. 160 

1,750,145 

4 

241,071 

71,915,753 


Dollars. 

79, 403 

473, 749 

1.206,275 

1,460,969 

1,020,078 

146,644 

227,260 

64,366,104 

382,861 

15,611,568 

317.s:;7 

57, 190 

4.  4(13.  237 

933,284 


1.015. 20S 

1,498,399 

3,490,933 

41,724 

243,726 

97.045,440 


Dollars. 

44.  006 

19, 672 

39S,  153 

988, 730 

641,489 

149,809 

19,849 

60,208,148 

345,972 

16,941,593 

293,629 


1,100,567 
121,926 


757. 356 
1,424,167 
1,871,608 

62, 974 
69, 840 

85,  400, 088 


_ 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTUEE. 


mat  trad* 

EM 


Belgium 

t  : 

British  Guiana 

L--..-L  '.  .-.. 

China 

Cuba 

"..-     -  ...  .. 

Formosa 

Roan 



v      - '  

:•--.:.  -  ....  .t 

Fi__T  T  ."      I  --iT.  .5     .  . 

Reunion  Island. 

7r.7_  ..." 
::.  :       ir.-.r.es 


I  ir. . 

Fan. 

Fan. 

Ian. 

Apr. 

Apr. 

Fan 

Fan. 

1  in. 

FaiL 

1  in. 

Fan. 
Fan. 

Jan. 

Jan. 

'  ~r 
.Tiir_ 

Fan. 


Povnd-e. 

.   - 
■   -  . 
... 

\   417   • 

- 

- 

■  - 

■  -    : 
-      •         .     •  " 

. 

■  •- 
.'     -  ■     174 

.  - 

282   752   '.' 

■ 

.    ■■      .,- 

492.073. 00 


Pounds. 
1,50     882,18 

.      ". 
!       283   771 

■     •  - 
28     . 

■    " 
1   "-.    ' 
1,904,371,1 

■   'J1.149 

_ 

. 
258.738.79 

217     ■ 

'.      -" 

_■■ 
■ 

7,792,00 


Pov  ndf. 

■   . 
257   . 

48,2c      J67 
282     25,76! 

•-   C4   ■   _ 

so,ooo 

.-     - 
.   -  •  -  -    -: 
•    i 

TA.--   ',' 

43B,12     ■- 

.    .       .41.034 
....     ^ 

. 

■■• 
."•-"■ 
540.-. .  •     •■ 

90.4 
115,2 

180,000 


Pound  t. 

5       . 

2     ' 

.   72     574 

80.432, 

5; 


i 

304,193, 

■       : 

945<?1,9]     -   . 
282    .  115,723, 


■ 
-  . 

■  ■ 

7 
•v 


"  32] 
93,931, 

; 

2 

..  154 

72.. VIS. 
320,347. 


951 
964 
- 
786 
400 
944 
800 
176 
926 
136 

. 
530 
746 
928 
s>3 

273 

"■" 
056 
128 
000 


T    "  ...  .  12, 072, -534,71  "'"'"-..',..".--  '113.753 

IMPORTS. 




.  :  ■ 
Canada 

CiT>    ■:    ■  ■■'.  !.-'•■ 

C  ":...-■ 

I     ^  r\    :  •: 

Finland 
Plane 

Fa|  in 

]  ■   " :.   : . ,  -..  .  - 

:■  -----  .      ..:. 
y  - 

r  -  :  - 
1    -  .-- 


-■  .     ■    -        -        04,848;]     47* 


- 

z 


a  Average.  19  .      I 

t  Average.  1903-1904. 

/  Imports  for  1899,  latest  available  returns. 


STATISTICS    OF    SUGAR. 


621 


Production  of  sugar  in  tlie  United  States  and  possessions.  1854-5  to  1906-7. 


[Census  data,  as  far  as  available,  are  given  in  italics.  Beet-sugar  production  for  1S97-98  from  Special 
Report  of  Department  of  Agriculture;  for  1901-2  to  1906-7  from  Progress  of  the  Beet-Sugar  Industry  in 
the  United  States;  for  other  vears  from  Willett  &  Gray.  Production  of  cane  sugar  in  Louisiana  for 
1904-5  to  1906-7.  and  of  Texas  "for  1903-4  to  1906-7,  from  Willett  i  Gray;  earlier  statistics  for  Louisiana 
and  other  Southern  States  from  Bouchereau.  in  part  taken  directly  from  his  reports  and  in  part  from 
the  Statistical  Abstract.  Porto  Rican  production  of  cane  sugar  for  1S54-55  to  18S4-S5  from  Rueb  &  Co.; 
for  later  vears  from 'Willett  &  Gra v.  Statistics  for  Hawaii,  1874-75  to  1SS0-81,  represent  exports,  from 
Bureau  of  Statistics  Bui.  30;  for  1881-82  to  18S4-S5  from  Rueb  &  Co. ;  for  later  vears  from  AVillett  &  Gray. 
Statistics  for  Philippine  Islands  for  1S54-55  to  1857-58.  1859-60  to  1806-67,  1872-73  to  1894-95  represent 
exports  as  officially  returned,  taken  from  the  Census  of  the  Philippine  Islands.  1903;  for  1858-59,  1867-68 
to  1S71-72  from  Foreign  Markets  Bui.  14,  representing  commercial  estimates  of  exports;  for  later  vears 
from  Willett  &  Gray,  the  statistics  for  1895-96  to  1903-4  representing  exports,  for  1904-5  to  1906-7,  pro- 
duction.    Tons  of  2,240  pounds  are  used  throughout.] 


Cane  sugar. 


Year. 


Beet 
sugar. 


1863-64 

1864-65 

1865-66 

1866-67 

1867-68 

1868-69 

1869-70 

1870-71 

1871-72 

1872-73 

1873-74 

1874-75 

1875-76 

1876-77 

1877-78 

1878-79 

1879-80 

1880-81 

1881-82 

1882-83 

1883-84 

1884-85 

1885-86 

1886-87 

1S87-88 

1888-89 

1889-9o'(  Census)  . 

1890-91 

1891-92 

1892-93 

1893-94 

1894-95 

1895-96 

1896-97 

1897-98 

189S-99 

1898-99  ( Census)  . 

1899-1900 

1899-1900     ( Cen- 
sus)   

1900-1 

1901-2 

1902-3 

1902  ( Census) 

1903-4 

1904-5 

1901-5  {Census)... 

1905-6 

1906-7 


Louisiana. 


1854-55 

Long  tons. 

1855-56 

1856-57 

1857-58 

1858-59 

1859-60 

1860-61 

1861-62 

1862-63 

500 
700 

b  100 

200 

1,200 

500 

6  500 

535 
953 
600 
800 
255 
1,861 
2,203 


3,459 
5,356 
12,018 
19,9o0 
20,092 
29,^20 
37,536 
40,3y8 
32, 471 


72,944 

7S,97S 

76,859 
164, »27 
194, 782 


Long  tons. 

171,976 

113,647 

36,327 

137,351 

185, 177 

113,891 

118,332 

235,858 

43,232 

37,723 

4,821 

8,884 

19, 152 

18,482 

42, 434 

44,399 

75,392 

65,583 

55,958 

46,090 

60,047 

72,954 

85;  122 

65, o71 

106,908 

8>,s22 

121,867 

71,3T3 

135, 297 

128,443 

94,376 

127,9.58 

so.vy.i 

157,971 

144, 87S 

124,772 

ISO. 413 

215,844 

lo0,937 

217, o25 

2o5.836 

317,334 

237.721 

282. 009 

310, 447 

2*i,512 

248. 658 

147,164 

142. 485 
270,338 

321,676 
329,226 


214,825 
216, 173 
226.  715 
279,393 
431,7% 


228, 477 
335,000 


330,000 
230,000 


Other 

Southern 

States. 


Long  tons. 
13, 169 
9,821 
2,673 
6,385 
S,169 
5,149 
4,313 
5,138 
2,768 
250 
179 
348 
3,348 
4,518 
2,567 
2,402 
4,208 
4.217 
4,235 
2,410 
3,  454 
4,046 
3,879 
5,330 
5,090 
3,980 
5,500 
5,000 
7,000 
6,800 
6,500 
7,200 
4,535 
9,843 
9,031 
8,159 
4,089 
6,107 
4,500 
5,000 
6,854 
\2sS 
4,973 
5,570 
5,737 
3,442 
c  5,266 
2.1)27 

1,510 
2,891 

3,614 
3,722 


Porto 
Rico. 


Long  tons. 
58,377 
82,000 
85,000 
69, 444 
5S,000 
57,000 
67,000 
68,000 
63,000 
61,590 
63,375 
64, 417 
68,229 
73,935 
81,500 
102,110 
103,304 
89,559 
87,639 
71, 755 
72, 128 
70,016 
62,340 
84,347 
76,411 
57,057 
61,715 
80,066 
77,632 
98,665 
70,000 
64,000 
86,000 
60.000 
62,000 
55,000 


c  19,800 
c  15,000 


<•  12,000 
<-  13,000 


Hawaii. 


Philippine 
Islands. 


Long  tons. 


50,000 
70,000 
50,000 
60,000 
52,500 
50,000 
58,000 
54,000 
53,826 


35,000 


80,000 
85,000 
85,000 


130,000 
145,000 


11,197 
11,639 
11,418 
17, 157 
21,884 
28,386 
41,870 
50,972 
51,705 
63,948 
76,496 
96,500 
95,000 
100,000 
120,000 
120,000 


Long  tons. 
35,008 
47. 

36; 

26. 
50, 
49. 
45, 
60, 
51. 
44. 
46, 
40, 
55, 
74, 
68, 
78, 
87, 
95, 


99 
126 

128 
121 
120 
129 
178 
205 
148 
193 
120 
200 
182 
169 
158 
224 
142 


125,000 
115,598 
140,000 
136,689 
131,698 
201,632 
224, 218 
204, 833 
252,  .507 


136 

248 
257 
207 
336 
230 
202 
178 
93 


25S,521 

94S,  008 

321,461 
317,509 
391,062 


328, 103 
380, 576 


213,000 
255,000 


383,225 

390,000 


145 
150 


Lonq  tons. 
278,530 
252, 865 
160,066 
240,038 
301,441 
225, 053 
234, 961 
369, 953 
160, 240 
144,288 
114,867 
114, 6S5 
146,324 
171,416 
195, 719 
227,525 
270, 769 
255,285 
232, 197 
220,725 
273,015 
2S7,240 
283:911 
292, 701 
340,270 
357,774 
436, 960 
355, 958 
465,860 
418,590 
449,  322 
478, 277 
436,234 
486, 514 
562. 631 
452, 68S 


400 
637 
000 

m 

000 


525 

500 


536,  445 
605, 197 
681,935 
696, 648 
865,988 
753,546 
809,333 
793, 415 
6S0,758 


578,441 


S06,949 

971,263 
1,093,792 

i,'66.5;  205 
1, 198, 624 


1.363,143 
i;  470, 296 


a  Mean  annual  production;  quantity  varied  from  year  to  year  between  300  and  500  tons. 
b  Production  uncertain;  not  exceeding  quantity  stated. 
c  Texas. 


622 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Sugar-beet  acreage  and  beet-sugar  production  in  the  United  States,  1901-2  to  1906-7. 

[From  reports  of  Department  of  Agriculture  on  Progress  of  the  Beet-Sugar  Industry  in  the  United 
States.     Full  explanations  of  the  table  are  given  in  the  report  for  1'j 


State  and  year. 


Facto- 
ries in 

opera- 
tion. 


Area 
har- 
vested. 


Aver 
age 
yield  of 
beets 
per 
acre. 


Beets 
worked. 


Sugar 
manu- 
factured. 


Aver- 
age 
extrac- 
tion cf 
su^ar. 


beets. 


age 
length 
of  cam- 


1906-7. 

California 

Colorado 

Idaho 

Michigan 

Nebraska 

Utah 

Wisconsin. 

Nine  States  hav- 
ing oue  factory 
each 

Total    or    aver- 
I 

1905-6 

1904-5 

1903-4 

1902-3 

1901-2 


Xo. 


A  ores. 

60,141 
110,943 

19,950 
93,984 

13,  650 

24. 10S 


Short 
tons. 
11.17 
13.41 
11.48 
•  "7 
9.77 
15.88 
10.19 


9.  75 


Short 
tons. 
671,571' 
1,487,383 

229,  023 
805,309 
133, 3S7 

15S,600 


Pounds. 
185,480,000 

56,798,000 

177,214,000 

30,754,000 

80,848,000 


Per 

cent. 

13. 81 

11.24 

12.40 

11.08 

11.53 

10. 56 

11.10 


Per 

cent. 
16.7 
14.7 
16.9 
14.5 
13.7 
14.5 
13.6 


82.7 

80.3 

83.3 

SO.  6 
81.8 

83.0 


36S,  070       06. 524, 000 


Days. 
115 
132 
95 
85 
136 
123 
83 


63 


376. 074 


11. 26     4,  236. 112     967, 224, 000 


82.2 


307, 364 
197,784 

242.  .".76 
216,400 
175,  OSS 


S.67 
10.17 
8.56 
8.76 
9.63 


2.665,913 
2.071,539 

2. 076.  491 

1,685,689 


iV25.841.22S 
484,226,430 

436,811,685 
369, 211, 733 


11.74 

15.3 

11.69 

15.3 

11.59 

15.1 

11.52 

14.6 

10.95 

14.8 

83.0 

-3.1 

(«) 

83.3 

.  _ 


a  No  data. 


CACAO. 


Cacao  crop  of  countries  named.  1982-1996. 
[This  table,  taken  from  the  Gordian,  Hamburg,  purports  to  cover  the  entire  production  of  the  world.] 


Country. 

1902. 

. 

1904.                   1905.                     1906.O 

St.  Thomas  (Portngues  i 

Pounds. 
■15.000 

55,04 

41,910.000 

35, 1J 
1 

21,851, 000 
5,372,000 

13, 173, 000 
5, 893. 000 
4,13 

4.387, 000 
5, 192, 000 
1.962,000 
3, 362, 000 
2. 039, 000 
1,429,400 
1.731.000 

Pound*. 

47,291,000 

51.232.000 

45.  720.  000 

32,  8 . 

17,251,000 

27,'  " 
5,064,000 
'■58,  000 
6,78 

'   787.000 
4.795.000 
4.  905. 000 
3,  215. 000 
3. 638. 000 
2. 535. 000 
1.764.000 
1.764.000 

Pounds.           Pounds. 

-".000         46,579.000 
51,059.000  |      46, 
40,949,000         44.1 33. «» 

Pounds. 

"1.800,000 
54,900,000 

60, 4C0.  000 
35.  10(1.000 

Brazil 

Trinidad 

M0, 000 

88,  76S,  000 

12.540,000 

13.7. 

7.176.000 

7.201,000 

81.000 

1,883.000 

13,000 

3, 638. 000 

2.(378.000 

2.  445, 000 

1,764.000 

1,070.000 

510.000 

1.764,000 

28, 1S5,  OCO 

25.  795, 000 

12.491.000 

12, 028. OCO 

7.S10.000 

0.014.000 

5, 160.  CC0 

3,553,000 

3.289,000 

3.273.000 

2. 646. OCO 

8, 613, 000 

L 543, 000 

1,31a 

429.  000 
1.764,000 

24,300,000 

Gold  Coast  (Lagos) 

13,400,000 

10,400,000 

S.  400, 000 

0,600,000 

Haiti 

5, 500. 000 

4.400.000 

3,  700, 000 

Jamaica 

4,900.000 

French  West  Indies 

3. 100. 000 

3,500,000 

1,800.000 

Dominica 

1,300.000 

Koneo  Free  State 

400,000 

1, 643,000 

1.764,000 

1  300,400 

Total 

266, 625, 000 

551,000 

323,093,000       311.674.000 

326,300,000 

i  Preliminary  estimate. 


STATISTICS    OF    TEA. 


623 


Cacao  consumption  of  countries  named.  1902-1906. 
[From  the  Gordian,  Hamburg.] 


Count  rv. 


United  States 

Germany 

France 

England 

Netherlands  (net  imports) 

Spain 

Switzerland 

Belgium 

Aust  ria-Hunga  ty 

Russia 

Denmark 

Italy 

Sweden 

Canada 

Australia 

Norway 

Portugal 

Finland 


Pounds. 

50. 073.  COO 

45.419.000 

42,644,000 

44.943.000 

20,  2-2-2.  000 

20.415.000 

12,582,000 

5.021.000 

4,013.000 

4.  Ojs.  (XX) 

1,768.000 

1,028,000 

1.304.000 

689.000 

1,223.000 

904.000 

248.000 

104.000 


Pounds. 
62,850.000 

47.  aso.  000 

45, 500. 000 

38.550.000 

23.657.000 

13,242,000 

12,911.000 

6',  102. 000 

4.4^"   I    0 

4,190.000 

2,535.000 

1.032.000 

1,708,000 

1.291.000 

979.000 

970.000 

301.000 

135.000 


Pounds. 

73.104.000 

59,748,000 

48. 000. 000 
45,311.000 
20.802.000 
12,370,000 
"     7t 

6,155.000 
5.534.000 
4.532.000 
2.  I!  6,000 
1.057.000 
1,920,000 
1.433,000 
1.213.000 
1.041.000 
397,000 
139.000 


Pounds. 

77.070.000 

65.330.000  . 

47.945.000 
.XXI 

23,672, 

13.452.000 

11,505 
6,656,000  I 
5.8S3,000 
4,917,000 
2,480,000 
2.142.000 
1,984,000 
1,543.000 
1.323.000 
1.089,000 
304.000 
132.000 


Total I     257.50S.000  '     267.S1S.000 


Pounds. 

7.V4S0.O0O 

75.40O.0CO 

51.200,000 

40.960.000 

24.090,000 

13.070.000 

14.110.000 

■0.000 

6,610,000 

5.510.000 

2.050.000 

2.430.000 

2.210,000 

1,650,000 

1.430.000 

1.210,000 

330.000 

140.000 


306.150.000       313,958.000  :      335.S00.000 


a  Preliminary  estimate. 

TEA. 

International  trade  in  tea.  1901-1906. a 

EXPOS  -  - 


Country. 


British  India 

Ceylon 

China 

Dutch  East  Indies. 

Formosa 

Japan 

Singapore 

Other  countries 


Year 
begin- 
ning- 


Apr. 

;  Jan. 

Jan. 

Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 


Total. 


1901. 


1802 


1903. 


1904. 


Pounds. 
182,997,444 

144.27 

154.399.007 

17.298.690  i 

19.926.072 

- 1 . 077 

2.222.00; 

3,891,000 


568,991,625 


Pounds. 
183,985,406 

! 
202.561.467 
15,637,322 

43. 334. 372 
1.903,  S67 
4,437,000 


624.5S2.OO0 


Pounds. 
209.599.041 
149.227.236 
223,670,667 

21.333.166 

1,955,067 

4.692.000 


1S05. 


Pounds. 
215. >  v 
157,929,342 
193,4! 

2ti.0ll.407 
21.735.027 
47.1'  • 
2.752.-.  33 
5.428.000  i 


Pounds. 
229,147.998 
170. 183, 572 
182.573.007 

-  I 
23.779.542 
3--.  566,  526 

2   .    - 
64,612.000 


2,285,544 


670.147.1S2      077.215.101 


IMPORTS. 


Argentina 

Australia 

Austria-Hungary. . 
British  India. ..'.... 

Canada 

Cape  of  Good  Hope. 

Chile 

Dutch  East  Indies. 

France 

French  Indo-China. 

Germany  c 

Netherlands 

New  Zealand 

Persia 

Russia. 


Singapore 

United  Kingdom. 

United  States 

Other  countries. . 


Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Apr. 
July 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Mar. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
July 


Total . 


1,648,156 

27,018.196 

2.257.092 

3,386,557 

19.530,654 

3,169,031 

1.924.379 

4.000.900 

1,899,974 

2.  ,  85,  335 

7. 275. 253 

7,956,562 

I   ■ 

d 6, 353, 224 

125.924.142 

4,179,333 

252.003.527 

75.  579. 125 

12.305.000 


505.  425. 050 


1.652.S23 
24.S22.544 
2,258,194 
3.921.503 
23. 909.371 
4,512,958 
1,883,307 
4,218,013 
2,084,587 
2. 90S.  707 
7.501.607 
7.989,226 

d0. 353. 224 

135,      •   .    " 

4.201.21X1 

108,574,905 

17,169,000 


612.654.S79 


1,798.310 
24.  710.  420, 
2.30.4.457 
4,817 
31,360,014 
793,311 
1,977,766 
4;45S 
2  2 ; 
2)947 
6.  So 
7,92 

5.232.721 

6,922.170 

132.070.193 

4,243,467 

27.020 

112,905.541 

15,884,000 


2,314,238 
28,353,903 

2.7' 

5. 520. 043 
25.0   ; 
3.254.29S 
2,427,520 
6  4,1' 
2,348  152 
3.034.445 
6,900.908 
9,090,607 
5,906,653 
i  6, 353, 224 
8112,584,435 
6  4. 30 

207.U97.32S 

21,750 

b  14,  lil,  000 


633, 701.  OSS     017.099.936     600,710.016 


2,418,217 

i 
5. 135. 126 
20.314.242 
3. 322. 815 
1,760,302 
4.044.S20 
2,446,200 
3,436,080 
1      - 

794,20$ 
5.  225.  oos 
5.7S4.277 

121,648,892 
4.602.533 

270.514.472 

11,025,000 


n  See  "  General  note.  "  d.  546. 
b  Average,  1901-1904. 
cNot  including  free  ports. 


d  Average,  1903-1904. 
«  Preliminary  figures. 


624 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


COFFEE. 

International  trade  in  coffee,  1901-1906.a 

EXPORTS. 


Country. 


Year 

begin- 
ning— 


1901. 


1902. 


1903. 


1905. 


Brazil 

British  India 

Colombia  * 

Costa  Rica 

Dutch  East  Indies. 

Guatemala 

Haiti 

Jamaica 

Mexico 

Netherlands 

Nicaragua 

Salvador 

Singapore 

United  States 

Venezuela 

Other  countries 


Total. 


Jan. 

Apr. 

Jan. 
•-Sept. 

Jan. 

Jan. 
«  Oct. 

Apr. 

J  illy 

Jan. 

Jan. 

July 

Jan. 

July 

July 


rounds. 

1,952.404,204 

28,564,704 

55,000,000 

36,539,460 

72.185,647 

75,414,600 

58,123,824 

11,551,557 

48,949,705 

164,050,182 

12,963,920 

50,101,756 

9,621,067 

27,532,353 

6108,000,000 

30,107,000 


2,741,109,979    2,565,188,316 


rounds. 
1.740.434.770 
30,146,480 
60,000,000 
30,311,568 

115,448,887 
85,674,400 
64,428,104 
12,079,872 
41,837,859 

168,524,286 
19,628,876 
41,iil9,090 
12,355,333 
29,768,945 
71,206,846 
41,723,000 


Pounds. 
1,709,984,152 
32.620,448 

100,000,000 
38,211,860 

116,334,830 
63,150,500 
47,853.529 
8,966,832 
40,698,861 

181.1 
18,431,643 
58,097,158 
15,125,067 
32,614,390 

125,582,423 
35,375,000 


2,624,243,479   2,278,346,148 


Pounds. 
1,326,027,795 
36,920,464 

130,000,000 
27.730,672 
77.168,254 
71,653,700 

81,407,346 

5  781,440 

d  41,855.368 

166,468,567 

21,661,621 

75,314,003 

10,638,667 

Id. 109,251 

6  128,000,000 

1. 1.1.09,000 


Pounds. 
1,431,328,038 
40,340,384 
70,000,000 
39,788,002 
72, 864, 649 
81,081,600 
45,244,232 
9,046,464 

d  42,456,491 

148,744,186 
18,171,515 
61,822,223 

f 11,935,034 
29,184,504 
94,370,090 

e  42,  204, 000 


2,238,581,412 


IMPORTS. 


Argentina 

Austria-Hungary 

Belgium 

Cape  of  Good  Hope.  .J 

Cuba 

Denmark 

Egypt 

Finland 

France 

Germanv/ 

Italy 

Netherlands 

Norway 

Russia 

Singapore 

Spain 

Sweden 

Switzerland 

United  Kingdom . . 

United  States 

Other  countries 


Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Julv 


71 

18 

20 

20 

10 

19 

185 

380 

35 

261 

27 

20 

9 

22 

68 

20 

31 

1,091 


684,999 
056,753 

971,468 
060,924 
611,122 

873,301 
694,613 
565,782 
780,736 
935,533 
059,001 
942,004 
441,922 
553,961 
624,533 
995,484 
455, 09S 
712,644 
568,658 
004.2.52 
660,000 


12,117, 
99,434, 
69,660, 
25, 818 i 
21,133, 
23, 381 i 
13,991, 
22,130, 

189,253, 

379,945, 
35,846, 

291,984, 
28,340. 
21,483. 
1.3,046, 
20,419, 
\  555 
22,313, 
62,344, 

915,086, 
61,248, 


621 
846 
936 
323 
898 
119 
78S 
291 
397 
s7.S 
933 
983 
658 
649 

soo 

436 

1.32 
200 
279 
380 
000 


18,502,868 

104,200,357 

51,859,425 

20,979,803 

17,218,114 

24,369,892 

13, 196, 168 

25,598,739 

246,122,708 

403,070,820 

38,934,065 

259,525,128 

27,996,473 

21,320,455 

14,958,400 

21,851,660 

68,349,071 

23,671.026 

51,017,884 

995,043.284 

78,221,000 


Total 2,479,252,848    2,386,537,567   2,526,007,340   2.478,902,977     2.258, 14S.  110 

I 


16 

108, 

154, 

19, 

20, 

25, 

12, 

23, 

168, 

39S, 

39, 

193, 

23, 

20, 

9, 


39, 

1.047, 

51, 


931,049 
701,092 
387,057 
448,590 
716,876 
552,671 
7S9,537 
291,871 
198,472 
486,529 
087,728 
836,257 
699,731 
976,264 
174,666 
000, 781 
623,344 
.H.2.322 
508,156 
792,984 
137,000 


18,516,812 

107,106,048 

100,032,285 

21,136,170 

e  19,920,002 

25,348,744 

13,996,858 

25,743,433 

200,594,621 

398,491,379 

d  41,285,969 

206.246,193 

25,298,346 

d  21,559,342 

11,701,100 

'21,816,840 

66, 417,080 

20,958,680 

493,275 

851,6*8,933 

'59,816,000 


«  See  "  General  note.'-  p.  546. 
t>  Estimated. 
'Year  preceding. 


d  Preliminary  figures. 

t  Average.  1901-1904. 

/  Not  including  free  ports 


TRADE    IX    OIL    CAKE    AXD    OIL-CAKE    MEAL. 


625 


OIL  CAKE  AND  OIL-CAKE  MEAL. 

lulu' national  trade  in  oil  cake  and  oil-rake  meal,  1901-1906.** 

EXPORTS. 


Country. 


Year 
begin- 
ning- 


1901. 


1902. 


1903. 


Argentina Jan. 

Austria-Hungary Jan. 

Belgium Jan. 

Canada July 

China Jan. 

Denmark Jan. 

Egypt Jan. 

France Ian. 

Germany  & Jan. 

Italy . . ." Jan. 

Netherlands Jan. 

Russia Jan. 

United  Kingdom '■  Jan. 

United  States July 

Other  countries 


Pounds. 

20,518.417 

59.327,039 
132; 103, 005 

20, 745, 648 

89,672,067 

7,522,545 

107,812,630 

242,983,580 

299,993.939 

26,508,816 
154,833.546 
850,865.092 

53,146.240 

1,048,093,619 

7,298,000 


Pounds. 

18,984,000 

64,246,433 
128,843,692 

28,830,032 

89,672,067 

4,045,586 

130,544,487 

325,807,127 

328,769,320 

24,908,481 
139,814,583 
850,095,204 

53,146,240 
1,679,394,359 

11,491,000 


Pounds. 

19, 989. SOS 

88,614. 7vl 
137,086,773 

29,002,1.24 

89,672,067 

8,682,295 

156,944,836 

314,693,035 

375,254,222 

19,627.750 

136,734,208 

1,028,500,994 

53.146,240 
1,503, 232, 6S0 

14,337,000 


1904. 


Pounds. 

29.019,439 

92.352.93S 
145,834,669 

10,115,392 

83,999.467 

4,417.928 

160, 794; 106 

351.62S.964 

436,964,238 

24,696,396 

154,525,289 

1,084,331,094 

48,462,400 
l.S94,577,648 

26,149,000 


1905. 


Pounds. 

29,277,380 

77,134,433 

160,163,061 

26,227.370 

95,344,667 

5,676,571 

147,961,001 

339,529,396 

397,800,450 

c 24, 425, 228 

143,290,470- 

0  977,465,158 

57,830,080 

1,918,171,984 

'■26,149.000 


Total 3,721,424,183   3,878^352,617   3,975,498,813    4,547,868,968     4,426,446,255 

i \__^ I I 1 I 

IMPORTS. 


Austria-Hungary Jan. 

Belgium Jan. 

Canada July 

Denmark Jan. 

Dutch  East  Indies Jan. 

Finland Jan. 

France Jan. 

Germany  6 Jan. 

Italy Jan. 

Japan |  Jan. 

Netherlands Jan. 

Sweden I  Jan. 

United  Kingdom Jan. 

Other  countries 


16,879,909 
!    322,9 

7,683.200 

j    524,125.732 

17.963,013 

10,405,942 

'■     255.172.170 

11,180,863,666 

12,593,462 

78,582,800 

I     429,765,565 

:    119,861,354 

,     842.437,120 

18,751,000 


7,656,432 

353.641.510 

3,521,616 

054,111,347 

15,691,801 

12,594.155 

238,507,6S1 

1.074,490,055 

7,909,522 

55,550,267 

461,479,090 

142,046,653 

861,678,720 

21,898,000 


Total 3,838,033,859   3.910,777,449 


21,750,589 

421.  090.  899 

3,808,224 

776,875,723 

15,977,041 

7,205,192 

279,9S0,299 

1,108,3""   853 

9,645.221 

71,402,S00 

476,967,295 

163,933.913 

811,798,400 

25,702,000 


27,340, 

445,202. 

3.953. 

757,481, 

31,004, 

13,948, 

292,015, 

1,231,409. 

6,525; 

73,540, 

495,92L 

219,913, 

823,934; 

54. 076. 


840 

134 
370 
664  I 
951  ! 
954 
079  I 
255 
902  I 
133 
130  ! 
686  I 
720 
000 


26, 

44S, 

2 

840 ', 

20, 

11, 

323, 

1,285, 

c5, 

101, 

510, 

226. 

797, 

<*54, 


469,794 
216,564 
308,432 
119  71.5 
159, 201 
179,475 
719,234 
529,859 
209,963 
574,267 
951,427 
374,498 
368,320 
070, 000 


4,195,099.440  4,476,267,824  4,653,256,749 


0  Pee  "  General  note"  p.  546. 
l>  Not  including  free  ports. 


c  Preliminary  figures. 
•1  Figures  for  1904  used. 


RES1X. 
International  trade  in  resin.  1901-1906.a 


EXTORTS. 


Country. 

ginning—          190K                  1902-                  1903-                  1904- 

1905. 

Austria- II  ungarv 

Germany  b 

Netherlands 

United  States 

Other  coimtries 

Pound'.      <      Pounds.      '      Pounds.           Pounds. 
Jan.      1  ,        3.621,312  ;        3.378.583           3,327,436           3,627,485 
Jan.      1  j      42.257.533  1      33.756.511         44.  .552, 705         45.017,597 
Jan.      1         65.473.834         74.850.747         0,3.038.801         83.943.225 
July     l|     710.069,360|     671.019,440       723,830.24a      646.877,000 
i            252,000              288,000,            373,000              338,000 

Pounds. 

3. 372. 410 

46,370.255 

58,544.509 

682,795,1  30 

c 177, 000 

Total 

821. 074. 039       7n3.299.2S1       S35. 122.242       780.403.507  i      791.259.854 

"  See  'General  note,"  p.  540. 
3    a  1906 40 


i»  Not  including  free  ports. 


c  Preliminary  figures. 


02G 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


International  trade  in  resin,  1901-1906 — Continued. 
IMPORTS. 


Country. 


Argentina 

Austria-Hungary. 

Brazil 

a 

Chile 

Cuba 

Denmark 

Finland 

France 



Italy 

Japan 

Netherlands 

Russia 

Servia 

Spain 

D 

Switzerland 

United  Kingdom. 
Uruguay 

Other  coin:'.  I 


Year  be- 
ginning- 


Total. 


Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
July 

Jan. 

Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
July 


1901. 


1902. 


Ponnd.--. 
-     -IS,  335 
56, 651 

14,8 
1,57 

2.: 
2,4 

3, 019.50) 
1.023. 414 
235. 12.-..  141 
30.97 
3.  : 

66.  i 
8>157 

- 

5  -  - 
1J4.034.400 
i 
3,367,000 


1903. 


Pounds. 

18.292,214 

58,450,261 

-      "     i 

-- 
-      - 
3,071,429 
1,007,995 

29,474,694 

I 
94,202,987 
t5, 531 .  334 

5,399,144 
11.123.176 

I 

5,4!  • 
4.316.000 


Pounds. 

19,761,229 

72,122,004 

• 

1,630,318 

25,020,035 

■ 

1S3.607.872 
4. 390. 394 


1904. 


K05. 


Pounds. 
27, 

19,1 

2,  135. 176 
3,38 

463,167 
I 
65,4 
4,887 
3,98 
13,44 

10, 101 
199,577 

9. -68. COO 


Pounds. 
20, 409, 438 

27    -.1.136 
- 
2.0 :5. 007 

- 
5,1 

■5,556 
7,894,  MB 

t>  5,  i 
11,4 

177,0 

»  7, 418, 000 


"      •         756,990,550       780,  J 


- 


. 


a  Preliminary  figures. 
I  Average,  1901-1904. 


e  Not  in<  hiding  bee  ports. 
<l  Including  turpentine. 


<  Average,  1901-1903. 


SPIRITS  OF  TURPENTINE. 

International  trad''  in  spirits  of  turpentine,  1901-19Q€.a 

E  XI'  OKI'S. 


Country. 

Year  be- 
ginning- 

1901. 

1902. 

1903. 

1904. 

1905. 

Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
July 

1 
1 
1 
1 
1 

Gallons. 
833,927 
565, 179 
941.527 
1,48 

19.  ! 

60.31S 

Gallons. 

1,288,879 

1.516,096 
16,378,787 

Gallons. 
1,97* 
'612,058 
9SS,059 
1,887 

Gallons. 
1,41 

569,650 

2,163,750 
15, 8 

- 

Gsllons. 
3,179.105 

520, 750 

Russia 

United  States 

2.507,833 
15,9 

Total 

23,062,178 

20,672 

22,738,297 

21,076,984 

23,237,930 

IMPORTS. 


Dtina 

Australia 

Canada 

Chile 

Germ,  an  \-6 

Italy..." 

Netherlands 

New  Zealand 

Russia 

Sweden 

Switzerland Jan 

United  Kingdom Jan. 

Other  count  riea 


Jan.     1 


July  1 
.1  an".  1 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  1 
J  an.  1 
Jan.  1 
1 
1 


Total. 


5! 

875.  061 

78,  87  I 

8, 435.  772 

! 
- 

a 

140,774 
- 
9.701.051 
515.546 


213,099 

941,003 

69,044 

8,077,490 
663, 193 

3.245.616 
130, 881 
142,741 
124,723 
313,363 


22, 524, 131 


276, 360 

I 
8,300,249 

69, 596 
201, 133 

126. 194 

8,012,184 

493, 579 


344. S77 
963,138 

816,629 
2,220,156 

372.367 
7.907.418 


290,192 

■ 

134.191 
S.53'3.910 

153.999 
190.595 
li5,383 

c 500, 376 


22,270,002 


a  Sec  "  General  note,"  p.  540. 


i>  Not  including  free  ports. 


c  Preliminary  figures. 


TEADE  IX  FOREST  PRODUCTS. 


627 


INDIA  RUBBER. 

International  trade  in  india  rubber.  1901-1906.a 

EXPORTS. 


Pounds. 

AngoIa& Jar..  1  5.000,000 

Belgium Jar..  1 

Bot.via Jan.  1  7 

Brazil Jan.  1 

Dutch  East  Indies Jan.  1 

Ecuador Jan.  1 

France Jan.  1  0,000,033 

French  Jan.  I 

French  E  Jan.  1 

Germany  <• Jan.  1'      11,050,068 

Gold  Coast  Colony. .. .    Jan.  1  j        1,520,009 

IvorvCcasr Jan.  1:        : 

Kanierun Jar..  1  1,115,334 

Kongo  Free  SI  in.  1         I 

Netherlands Jan.  1 

Pern I  Jan.  1 

Senegal '  Jan.  1 

Singapore Jan.  1  I 

rn  Nigeria  - 

rate Jan.  1 

Venezuela J  uly  1       /  : 

Other  countries 

Total 150,100,054 


1902. 


190:. 


1901. 


1905. 


Pound*. 
3,600,000  ; 
13,0 

i 

-     -  ,000  j 
1,5- 
13.743,023 

-•.974  ' 
2,01 

920, 533 

i 
1 


Pounds. 
6,000,000 
14,1  ■ 

69,'.'.       . 

1,090,988 

6,390,101 

- 

b  13,350,000 
231,008 
4,64S 

57 

1,441,200 

1,177  • 

J,7 

"    '70,000 


Pounds. 

6,000,000 
Id,: 

4,91 

3,590,439 

6,6  -.    -7 

-      : 

10,07 

V' 

■ 

1,920,354 
b  10,040,000 
3,  ' 

2.. 
3,026,133 

2.40S,92fi 

- 

8,921,000 


Pounds. 
5,200,000 
14,993 

10,7 

28     22 
■ 
7.105 
3,687 

•;,030 

2,141,777 
10,7- 

~  0,814 
4,290,160 

d  1,631,933 

-   $42,831 
2,876,110 

"Jo.OOO 


141,909,029       15S,324,1S2 


171,S06,6S3  I       ISO,  636,591 


IMPORTS. 


Jan.  1 

Belgium Jan.  1 

Canada July  1 

France Tah.  1 

Germany  c ,Tan.  1 

Italy Jan.  1 

Netherlands Tan.  1 

Russia Jan.  1 

I  Kingdom 1  an.  1 

United  States July  1 

Other  countries 

Total 


.294 
7".    - 

- 

11,79; 

I 

12,11     -~ 
19,34 


a 

12,061,674 

1,550,022 

• 

10,9G0,379 

55,010,571 
3,020,000 


i 
16,977,346 

.   782 

I 
3,920,000 


.058,661       194,091,050  ,      206,293,794 


- 
14,011,04!) 

7a 
i.  174,451 

22,140,043 
! 
8,091,000 


3,02 

19,69 

47,  : 
M,i- 

»  13,'  172 
29,  ( 

A  0,926  tOO 


a  See  ••General  not:."  p.  516. 
»  Estimated. 
e  Exoorts  in  1 


1901-1904. 
« Not  including  free  ports. 
A  Exports  in  1902. 


'  1-1905. 
A  Prelrr;. 


"WOOD  PULP. 
national  trade  in  wood  pulp.  1001-1906.a 

EXPORTS. 


- 

Belgium 



Finland 

Germany  c 

Norway 

Sweden , 

Switzerland 

United  Sta 
Other connl 


Total. . 


Jan. 
Jan. 
July 
Jan". 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
July 


Pounds. 

176,960,000 
58,016.833 

136,071.573 

- 

-     a 

974,000 


Pounds. 
98,::.. 

57, 5S5,05> 

309,120,000 

57,000,121 

;4,254 

•  1,986 

12,111 

12,550,693 

22,  i 

511,000 


Pounds. 

105.s74.7-7 
J,  478 
.000 

"_ 

987,10". 
790,80 

j    " 
30.2'  I,  e 
50,'». 


Poun  l», 

369. GOO, 000 
130,027,777 
155,086,119 
981,029,727 

-    i       " 

7 


Pounds. 
252,529 

"1,000 
133,4" 

■ 
14,004,420 

5,19ii,000 


1,934, 455, 9SS   2,302,15-3,400   2,499,135,636   2,759,086,460     2,740,159,963 


a  See ' '  General  note,"  p.  546. 


b  Estimated. 


'Not  including  free  ports. 


628 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


International  trade  ir,  Ip,  1901—1906 — Continued. 

IMP' 


Country. 


I 

ginning— 


1901. 


1902. 


Arg  lltiDa 

A  f-:r.  .-':.      .-■  .:. 
Belgium 

Fraric*- 

— 



Japan 

Russia. 

SpiiiE 

Sweden 

.-•-  .::■  -.   :.': 

Vr..--  •:  y  z-i- .    -...  . 

:■ 
0:;.-t  :    _-:.-.■  r . . . 


Fan. 
Jan. 
ran. 

Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 

Jan. 
Julv 


Pound*. 
13,4 

12.' 

1 

33,;.  1   322 

•"" 
132, 4  • 

3,87*     74 

i 
53 

. -:-      - 
-A  911 


1903. 


1304. 


1905. 


Pound*. 

'   '   - 
j   • 

183'-:-!     ■ 
•     '■ 
!     ' 
."     . 
: 
- 

• 
73.125,213 
5,464,912 

I 
"     ■- 
3       -13,440 
5,99 


Pound*.     ! 
.     •"■ 
4,961,343 
159,201 
6L63t 
420.541,612 
91,195  "  . 
1     . 

"  29,301 

S  TO.  926 

'  57  72 
10,344 

-■  2   ■ 

.4  4 
12 


Pounds. 
35,123,171 

:     .    ■ 
"  -  ■ 
- 

405,941,055 

S5,24     13 

22  72 
i   . 

■ 
1,22     '   . 

5 

-      ■      0 


Pound*. 

886. 404 

4,702,018 

174,530,000 

07,310,417 

490.998,886 

748,067 

i-93.7       "  2 

22,769.993 

t44; 

59,570,926 
579,205 
19,6* 

352,181,760 

947.000 


Total 69,782,67*         26,792,920  2,5  2,786,079,125    2, 75f   335,049 


- 


*•  Preliminary  figures. 


BILK. 

med,  1901—1905. 
[Baton  Silk  Manufacturers"  Association  of  1 


- 

Italy 





Aastria^llungary . 


.    -  . 


Pound-t. 
717,000 


: 

Anatolia 



-"-_;■•  -zj.:-    .:.-..'-.  :r.:-.r. :■:  -•-... 

Ba_;  

Greece  and  I Crete 

■eaaoa 

Persia  and 




922. 000 

- 


T   tal. 


.     - 

■ 
Eipoi 



.  ...  7,00 


Total 


-     -- 


- 


Pound*. 

I   257    0 

172.000 


7,774,000 

190,  D00 

0     I 


Pounds. 

■ 

170.000 
894,000 


11.793.00  5,00  13.045.0 


■ 
419.  000 
287      • 

1.025.000 


1.124.000 
547,00 

300.000 


1.090.000 

• 

14:1,000 

794,000 


'      ■ 


:    " 


I        i 
- 


-   ' 


- 

9,  7  •  ■ 
1.393.000 
172,000 
761,000 


4.705,000  I 


650,000 


_-   "-■     0 


181,000 


T.   . 


12.114.Ctt3 


.      ■ 
• 

4)9.000 
155.000 

1,014,000 


>.  841. 000 

4.409.000 


10,183,000 
393    0  617,000 


24,050,008 


'    «i  '        41.513.000 


a  Exports  fiom  Bombay  included  for  the  first  tune  in 


STATISTICS    OF    BEANS. 


629 


BEANS. 
Wholesale  prices  of  beans  per  bushel  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


Date. 


1902. 

January 

February... 

March.. 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. . 

October 

November. . 
December. . . 


1903. 

January 

FebAiary... 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. . 

October 

November. . 
December.. . 


1904. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July , 

August 

September. . . 

October 

November. .. 
December. . . 


1905 

January. . . 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October... 
November. 
December. . 


1906. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. .. 

October 

November... 
December. .. 


Boston. 


Pea. 


Low. 


$1.80 
1.80 
1.70 
1.60 
1.75 
1.65 
1.80 
1.95 
l.wO 
2.15 
2.35 
2.30 


2.40 
2.35 
2.25 
2.25 
2.25 
2.35 
2.30 
2.20 
2.30 
2.25 
2.15 
2.10 


2.00 
2.00 
1.95 
1.95 
1.85 
1.80 
1.75 
1.75 
1.85 
1.80 
1.72) 


1.75 
1.75 
1.80 
1.75 
1.75 
1.80 
1.85 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 


1.75 
1.65 
1.55 
1.60 
1.60 
1.60 
1.60 
1.55 
1.50 
1.55 
1.60 
1.50 


High. 


$2.05 
1.85 
1.80 
1.75 
1.90 
1.70 
2.15 
2.10 
2.00 
2.55 
2.45 
2.40 


2.45 
2.40 
2.30 
2.30 
2.35 
2.35 
2.35 
2.30 
2.40 
2.40 
2.20 
2.15 


2.10 
2.20 
2.20 
2.00 
2.00 
1.95 
1.80 
1.90 
1.90 
1.95 
1.85 
1.80 


1.75 
2.00 
1.97 
1.80 
1.80 
1.90 
1.90 
1.85 
1.75 
1.75 
1.85 
1.85 


1.80 
1.75 
1.60 
1.65 
1.70 
1.72 
1.62 
1.60 
1.55 
1.65 
1.65 
1.55 


Cincinnati. 


Pea. 


Low.  |  High. 


$2.60 
2.60 
2.60 
2.30 
2.30 
2.30 
2.30 
2.30 
2.30 
2.25 
2.20 
2.25 


$2.70 
2.70 
2.70 
2.70 
2.60 
2.60 
2.50 
2.50 
2.50 
2.50 
2.40 
2.40 


Navy. 
2.  40         2.  50 


2.25 
2.30 
2.15 
2.15 
2.15 
2.15 
2.15 
2.15 
2.15 
2.15 
2.05 


2.05 
2.05 
2.05 
2.05 
2.05 
2.05 
2.05 
2.05 
2.05 
2.05 
1.80 
1.80 


1.80 
1.80 
1.80 
1.80 
1.80 
1.80 
1.80 
1.80 
1.80 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 


1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 
1.65 


2.50 
2.40 
2.40 
2.25 
2.25 
2.25 
2.25 
2.25 
2.25 
2.25 
2.25 


2.10 
2.10 
2.10 
2.10 
2.10 
2.10 
2.10 
2.10 
2.10 
2.10 
1.90 
1.90 


1.90 
1.90 
1.90 
1.90 
1.90 
1.90 
1.90 
1.90 
1.90 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 


1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 


Chicago. 


Detroit. 


Pea. 


Pea, 


Low. 


$1.40 
1.40 
1.20 
.85 
1.50 
1.50 
1.60 
1.60 
1.60 
1.78 
2.15 
2.15 


1.25 
1.20 
1.25 
.90 
.90 
1.25 
1.20 
1.15 
1.50 
1.05 
1.05 
1.35 


1.00 
1.25 
1.25 
1.00 
1.10 
1.10 
1.10 
1.10 
.90 
.90 
1.10 
1.20 


1.25 
1.00 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.25 
1.20 
1.25 
1.25 
1.40 
1.40 


High. 


Low. 


1.40 
1.37 
1.35 
1.10 
1.20 
1.25 
1.25 
1.25 
1.39 
1.40 
1.40 
1.35 


$1.83 
1.75 
1.65 
1.80 
1.85 
1.70 
1.90 
1.96 
1.90 
2.49 
2.30 
2.30 


2.40 
2.30 
2.25 
2.20 
2.30 
2.35 
2.23 
2.25 
2.50 
2.25 
2.15 
2.00 


1.90 
2.05 
2.05 
1.85 
1.80 
1.78 
1.70 
1.65 
1.65 
1.75 
1.70 
1.70 


High. 


1.62 
1.85 
1.80 
1.70 
1.70 
1.75 
1.78 
1.72) 
1.68 
1.65 
1.70 
1.70 


1.62 
1.58 
1.55 
1.62 
1.62 
1.65 
1.04 
1.58 
1.53 
1.48 
1.46 
1.45 


$1.60 
1.53 
1.28 
1.28 
1.56 
1.48 
1.60 
1.63 
1.75 
1.70 
1.66 
1.74 


2.24 
2.10 
2.10 
1.88 
2.07 
2.20 
2.10 
1.91 
2.10 
1.90 
1.90 
1.82 


1.75 
1.74 
1.70 
1.70 
1.70 
1.60 
1.60 
1.61 


1.65 
1.58 
1.58 


1.56 
1.52 
1.70 
1.66 
1.62 
1.65 
1.66 
1.55 
1.50 
1.49 
1.55 
1.55 


1.55 
1.45 
1.40 
1.44 
1.48 
1.48 
1.50 
1.41 
1.30 
1.37 
1.34 
1.27 


$1.79 
1.62 
1.51 
1.62 
1.75 
1.60 
1.90 
1.90 
1.85 
1.98 
1.88 
1.81 


2.35 
2.23 
2.16 
2.10 
2.35 
2.25 
2.21 
1.96 
2.35 
2.28 
2.00 
1.90 


1.77 
1.98 
1.95 
1.80 
1.87 
1.70 
1.61 
1.78 


San  Francisco. 


Lima 
(percwt.). 


1.72 
1.64 
1.62 


1.65 
1.85 
1.77 
1.75 
1.68 
1.09 
1.68 
1.63 
1.65 
1.63 
1.68 
1.65 


1.61 
1.55 
1.47 
1.52 
1.54 
1.55 
1.52 
1.50 
1.44 
1.40 
1.37 
1.30 


Low. 


$4.40 
4.40 
4.35 
3.30 
3.60 
3.60 
3.60 
3.80 
3.70 
4,10 
4.20 
4.25 

Small 
2.90 
2.90 
3.00 
3.00 
2.90 
3.00 
3.00 
3.00 
2.85 
3.00 
2.75 
2.40 


2.75 
2.80 
2.85 
2.90 
2.95 
2.90 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 


2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
2.75 
3.00 
3.00 
2.75 
2.75 


High. 


$4.65 
4.60 
4.40 
3.60 
3.80 
3.85 
3.85 
4.10 
3.90 
4.35 
4.50 
4.55 

white. 
3.40 
3.35 
3.30 
3.30 
'3.25 
3.25 
3.25 
3.20 
3.25 
3.25 
3.15 
3.00 


3.00 

3.00 

3.10 

3.15 

3.10 

3.05 

3.00 

3.00 

3.10 

3. 32* 

3.30 

3.30 


3.30 
3.30 
3.45 
3.45 
3.40 
3.50 
3.60 
3.60 
3.60 
3.60 
3.15 
3.20 


630 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OP    AGRICULTURE. 


CLOVER  AND  TIMOTHY  SEED. 

Wholesale  prices  of  clover  seed  (60  pounds  to  the  bushel),  1902-1906. 


Cincinnati. 

Chicago. 

Toledo. 

Detroit. 

Date. 

Prime  (per 
100  pounds). 

Poor  to  choice 
(per  100 
pounds) . 

Prime  (per 
bushel;. 

Per  bushel. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

nigh. 

Low. 

High. 

1902. 

88.66 

S.65 
8.00 
7.10 
C.85 
6.86 
6. 85 
7.10 
7.10 
7.50 
7.50 
8.35 

Perb 

5.25 

G.OO 

6.25 

6.00 

5.40 

5.40 

S9.ee 

9.20 
9.20 
S.35 
7.50 
7.30 
7.50 
8.35 
8.35 
8.75 
9.20 
9.20 

ushel. 
6.50 
6.50 
7.10 
6.90 
7.00 
6.00 

S7.00 
6.50 
6.00 
4.00 
5.50 
6.00 
6.00 
6.00 
7.00 
7.00 
8.00 
8.00 

8.50 
9.25 

5.00 
8.00 
8.00 
8.00 
8.50 
5.00 
6.00 
4.00 
6.00 

G.OO 
G.OO 
6.00 
7.50 
6.00 
6.00 
7.00 
S.OO 
9.00 
7.00 
7.00 
7.00 

( 
S.OO 
9.00 
9.00 
S.OO 
8.00 
S.OO 
9.00 
8.50 
9.00 
9.50 
10.00 
10.00 

10.00 
10.00 
9.50 
7.00 
6.50 
7.00 
7.00 
7.00 
8.00 
8.00 
8.00 
8.50 

810. 00 

9.70 
9.00 
8.35 
8.35 
8.35 
8.40 
9.10 
9.50 
11.35 
11.15 
10.90 

1J.90 
11.90 
12.50 
12.25 
12.50 
11.75 
12.50 
12.50 
11.00 
11.50 
11.00 
11.25 

11.50 
11.25 
11.05 
11.00 
10.75 
10.75 
11.25 
12.75 
12.50 
12.25 
12.25 
13.00 

13.00 
12.50 
13.75 
14.40 
13.50 
13.00 
13.00 
13.00 
12.25 
13.25 
13.25 
13.25 

13.25 
14.15 
14.00 
13.50 
11.50 
11.25 
11.25 
12.50 
12.75 
13.00 
13.40 
14.00 

S4.25 
4.95 
4.30 
3.90 
3.90 
4.00 
4.10 
4.20 
4.25 
4.70 
4.75 
5.50 

4.40 
5.25 
4.00 
3.60 
4.00 
6.00 
6.40 
4.85 
4.00 
3.75 
3.40 
3.05 

3.10 
4.00 
2.50 
3.00 
3.00 
2.50 
3.00 
5.70 
3.60 
3.00 
3.30 
3.62J 

3.25 

4!6o 

3.00 
3.00 
3.50 
5.50 
5. 75 
4.00 
3.00 
3.00 
4.00 
4.00 

5.00 
4.00 
3.30 
3.25 
3.00 
5.00 
5.25 
4.50 
3.50 
3.60 
3.50 
3.00 

$6.15 
5.80 
5.65 
5.30 
5.22* 
5.25" 
5.30 
5.60 
5.65 
7.00 
7.10 
6.85 

7.421 

7.25" 

7.42J 

7.621 

7.70 

6.75 

7.10 

7.10 

6.65 

6.80 

6. 82  J 

7.05" 

7.07.'. 
7.024 
7.15 
6.621 
6.35" 
6.25 
6. 60 
7.(0 
7.45 
7.521 
7.70" 
7.95 

8.00 

7.60 

8.20 

8.85 

8.00 

7.40 

7.50 

7.50 

7.45 

8.22J 

8.121 

8.30 

8.35 
8.721 
8.40 
7.85 
6.80 
6.90 
7.10 
7.35 
S.10 
8.50 
8.30 
8.471 

§5.70 

5.55 
5.10 
4.C0 
5.00 

$6. 10 

5.80 

5.55 

5.20 

5.20 

Not  quoted. 

July 

Not  quoted. 

Not  quoted. 

5.15 
5.15 
5.35 
5.60 

7.25 
7.00 
0.95 

6.ro 

7.50 

5. SO 

5.T0 

5.65 

5.(0 

1903. 

•  7.30 

7.10 

7.40 

7.25 

7.50 

Not  quoted. 

Julv                               

Not  quoted. 

Not  quoted. 

5.00 
5.25 
5.25 
5.25 

5.75 
5.75 
5.75 
5.50 
4.80 
4.80 
4.80 
4.80 
6.00 
5.50 
5.50 
5.50 

6.40 
6.40 
G.40 
6.40 
6.25 
6.25 
6.25 

5.70 
5.70 

.5.60 
G.OO 

6.25 
6.25 
6.90 
6.50 
5.00 
5.00 
5.00 
6.50 
G.50 
6.75 
6.50 
7.50 

7.00 
7.00 
7.00 
7.75 
7.75 
6.75 
6.75 

Not  quoted. 

6.45 
6.50 
6.80 

6.75 
6.75 
6.20 
6.20 
6.30 

6.90 

6.60 

6.95 

1904. 

7.00 

6.90 
7.10 

6.55 

6.35 

Julv 

6.25 
6.50 
7.05 
7.30 
7.35 
7.70 

7.45 
7.40 
7.55 
8.00 
7.00 

6.  SO 

7.50 

7.45 

7.55 

7.65 

7.95 

1905. 

7.90 

7.55 

8.15 

April 

8.75 

May 

8.00 

5.70 
5.70 
6.50 
6.50 

6.50 
6.50 
6.50 
G.OO 
G.OO 
4.50 
4.50 
4.50 
5.00 
5.00 
7.00 
7.00 

6.00 
7.00 
7.00 

7.50 

7.50 
7.50 
7.50 
7.50 
6.50 
5.50 
6.00 
7.00 
7.00 
7.25 
7.50 
7.50 

6.30 
7.50 
7.95 
8.00 

8.10 
8.20 
7.30 
6.25 
6.25 
6.65 
6. 65 
7.00 
7.30 
7.95 
8.00 
8.20 

7.40 

8.25 

S.10 

8.15 

1906. 

8.30 

8.70 

8.35 

7.80 

6.75 

0.75 

Julv 

6.95 

7.50 

7.90 

8.30 

8.25 

8.40 

a  Poor  to  prime. 


STATISTICS    OF    TIMOTHY    AND    CLOVER    SEED.  631 

Wholesale  prices  of  timothy  seed  {45  pounds  to  the  bushel),  1902-1006. 


Date. 


June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. . 


January. . . 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. . 


January 

February . . 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October... 
November. 
December. . 


January. . . 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. . 


January. . . 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December.. 


1902. 


1904. 


1905. 


Cincinnati. 


Per  100  pounds 


Low.      High 


January SO.  10 

February 6.10 

March I  6. 10 

April |  0.  40 

May. 


3.90 
3.80 
3.30 
3.40 
3.40 


$6.  40 
6.40 
0.40 
G.G0 


4.40 
4.00 
3.65 
3.65 
3.65 


Per  bushel. 


1.55 
1.55 
1.45 
1.35 
1.35 
1.35 


1.35 
1.25 
1.25 
1.20 


1.20 
1.25 
1.25 
1.20 
1.20 
1.20 
1.20 
1.20 
1.15 
1.15 
1.15 
1.15 


1.15 
1.15 
1.15 
1.15 

1.20 
1.20 
1.20 
1.20 
1.40 
1.35 
1. 35 
1.30 


1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.35 
1.50 
1.50 
1.50 
1.50 
1.50 
1.50 


1.70 
1.70 
1.65 
1.50 
1.50 
1.60 


1.50 
1.50 
1.40 
1.40 


1.35 
1.35 
1.35 
1.35 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.35 
1.35 
1.25 
1.30 
1.30 


1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.30 
1.45 
1.60 
1.55 
1.40 
1.35 


1.35 
1.35 
1.35 
1.35 
1.35 
1.45 
1.  80 
1.80 
1.80, 
1.80 
1.80 
1.85 


Chicago. 


Per  100  pounds. 


Low.      Iligh. 


$5.00 
5.00 
5.00 
4.50 
5.00 
4.50 
4.50 
3.25 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 


2.50 
2.  .00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
1.75 
1.75 
2.50 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 


2.00 
2.25 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
1.75 
1.75 
1.75 


$6.55 
6.60 
7.00 
7.10 
7.35 
6.35 
5.75 
5.75 
4.75 
4.20 
4.25 
4.25 


4.35 
4  35 
3.  »5 
3.70 
3.75 
4.00 
3.65 
3.40 
3.40 
3.173 
3.00 
3.05 


3.25 
3.25 
3.25 
3.00 
3.05 
3.05 
3.25 
3.05 
3.00 
2.75 
2.70 
2.  72i 


1 

2.00 
2.25 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.50 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
1.50 
1.50 


2.00 
2.25 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.25 
2.50 
2.50 
3.00 
3.00 
3.00 
3.25 


Milwaukee. 


Per  100  pounds 


Low.      High. 


(a) 


2.80 
2.92. 
3.10 
3.10 
3.10 
3.00 
3.30 
3.60 
3.75 
3.40 
3.50 
3.50 


3.40 
3.35 
3.25 
3.20 
3.35 
4.25 
4.25 
4.10 
4.30 
4.  25 
4.40 
4.50 


$5.50 
5.50 
5.50 
6.00 
5.50 
5.00 
4.00 
3.75 
2.75 
2.50 
3.00 
3.00 


3.00 
3.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.25 
2.35 
2.60 
2.50 
2.50 
2.30 
2.25 
2.25 


2.25 
2.50 
2.00 
2.00 
2.25 
2.25 
2.00 
2.50 
2.25 
2.10 
2.10 
2.25 


2.25 
2.25 
2.25 
2.50 
2.50 
2.25 
2.25 
2.35 
2.70 
2.40 
2.50 
2.50 


2.50 
2.60 
2.40 
2.45 
2.60 
2.70 
3.25 
3.15 
10 
10 
10 


3. 
3.10 


$6.25 
6.25 
0.60 
6.75 
6.75 
6.25 
5.75 
5.00 
4.10 
3.75 
3.75 
3.75 


3.75 
3.75 
3.75 
3.25 
2.90 
3.35 
3.35 
3.25 
3.25 
3.00 
2.85 
2.75 


3.15 
3.15 
3.15 
2.90 
2.90 
2.90 
3.00 
3.00 
3.00 
2.80 
2.65 
2.65 


2.65 
2.65 
2.90 
2.90 
2.90 
2.90 
2.95 
3.50 
3.40 
3.50 
3.10 
3.10 


3.10 
2.80 
2.75 
2.80 

2.  95 
4.00 
4.00 

3.  75 
3.75 
3.75 
3.75 
4.25 


St.  Louis.a 


Per  100  pounds. 


Low.      High. 


$6.30 
5.75 
5.00 
5.00 
5.00 
5.00 
4  40 
3.00 
2.40 
2.80 
2.  SO 
2.90 


3.00 
2.75 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.40 
2.75 
2.50 
2.48 
2.20 
2.25 


2.25 
2.50 
2.40 
2.40 
2.40 
2.40 
2.40 
2.40 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 


2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.00 
2.40 
2.40 
3.00 
2.50 
2.50 
2.50 


2.60 
2.60 
2.50 
2.50 
2.40 
2.40 
3.00 
3.  CO 
3.60 
3.25 
3.  25 
3.25 


"  Poor  to  prime. 


632 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


FARM  ANIMALS  AND  THEIR  PRODUCTS. 


[Figures  furnished  by  the  Bureau  of  Statistics,  Department  of  Agriculture,  except  where  otherwise 
credited.    All  prices  on  gold  basis.] 

Live  stock  of  countries  named. 

[Africa  incompletely  represented,  through  lack  of  statistics  for  large  areas.  Number  of  animals  in 
China,  Persia,  Afghanistan,  Korea,  Bolivia,  Ecuador,  Salvador,  and  several  less  important  countries 
unknown.  For  Brazil  number  of  cattle  alone  estimated,  but  roughly.  In  general,  statistics  of  cattle, 
horses,  sheep,  and  swine  much  more  complete  than  those  of  other  animals,  as  statements  for  the  world.] 


Year. 

Cattle. 

Total. 

Dairy 

cows. 

Horses.         Mules.           Sheep. 

1                    1 

Swine. 

NORTH  AMERICA. 

United  States: 
Contiguous — 

On  farms 

Not  on  farms . . . 
Noncontiguous — 

Alaska  a 

Hawaii « 

Porto  Rico 

1907 
1900 

1900 
1900 
1899 

1905 

1905 
1900 
1900 
1900 
1900 
1901 



1898 
1904 

72,534.000 
1.010,422 

18 

102.908 
200,225 

20.908.000 
973,033 

13 

4.028 

73,372 

19.747.000     3.817,000       53.240,000 
2,930.881         173.908            231,301 

12,982             0,506             102, 09S 
58,004  .          0.985                6,363 

54, 794, 000 
1,818,114 

10 
8,057 
66,180 

Total   United 
States    (ex- 
cept Philip- 
pine Islands) 

74,513,573  ,  22,018,440 

22,755,532  ;  4,004,399       53,579,702     56,686,361 

i !         6  1.246    ; ' 

Canada: 

New  Brunswick 

230,000 
2, 903, 018 
521.112 
472;  854 
950, 632 

1            ! 

111,084!          02,000    183,000             55.000 

1.129,047           088,147  1 •      1.304,809       1,819,778 

170,143 
112,618 
mi  ais 

215.819  ' 28,975 

200,509 
123,916 

114,623 
561,  S66 

240.500  1 121,290 

220,534    1          154,260 

Other 

2,123.932       1,033,295 

531,249    '      1,178,872 

Total  Canada . 

7,262,148  j     2,057,432,     1,964,315    :      2,971,212;     2,875,692 

Central  America: 

190, 708 
509. 812 

1,200.000 
15G, 509 
308, 100 

5. 142. 457 
32.707 

I 

50.343    i            77,593 

43,107;        14,004              11,806          111,581 

Honduras 

1900 
1905 
1902 
1901 

1905 
1905 
1901 
1905 
1905 

1005 
1904 
<1906 
1904 
(*) 

30,863  j          1,500    2S.000 

54,974  !          2,987  1                 250             79,730 
859,217  1      334.435!      3.424.430           610.139 
8,851    78,058 

c  93, 155 

West  Indies: 
British — 

3    

d  1,437 

1,908 

111.703 

050  [ <U,088 

1,074    1.975 

Grenada 



72,8*7    ;        •    10,976 

246    ' 

28,500 

Turks  and  Cai- 

800 
0  000 

105  ! 1                 125 

255    300 

342,568                                 ff9,982 

905               177              26,582 

8.819  !          0,311               11.731 

Virgin  Islands . . 
Cuba 

2, 17o!  178 

4,048 

30,500 

/1, 053, 847 

9  358, 868 

3. 596 

Guadeloupe 

" 

Total     North 

91,710,888 

!            ! 

20,198,305  ;  4,409,432  |     60,211,864 

60,885,586 

1901 

1905 
1906 

SOUTH  AMERICA. 

Argentina 

30,000.000 

30,000,000 

77,050 

2,477.064 

1 

2,500,000 

! 

5.000,000  j      300.000     120,000,000 

800,000 

1,571    21,100 

13.350 

Chile 

•  124, 057 

098,  &S0  i      1 27, 930         2,  405, 584  1        287, 612 

a  On  farms. 

*  Including  mules  and  asses. 

eCows  in  1904. 

d  Data  for  1903. 

«  On  December  31  of  preceding  year. 

/Cows. 


g  Census  for  1899. 

A  Latest  official  estimate  furnished  by  the 
French  embassy  to  the  United  States,  under  date 
of  May  4,  1900.  " 

t  Data  for  1904. 

}  Data  for  1902. 


STATISTICS    OF    LIVE    STOCK. 
Live  stock  of  countries  named — Continued. 


633 


Year. 

Cattle. 

Horses. 

Mules. 

Sheep. 

Total.            Dairy 
cows. 

Swine. 

SOUTH  AMERICA— Cont'd. 

2,800.000  ! 

341.000 

209 

3.000 

182,789 

561,408 

191.079 

257.000 
74 

746,000 
153 

700, 894 

214,058 

18,608.717 

176,668 

2,300.000 

Dutch  Q mama 

1904 
1905 
1900 
1900 
1899 

8.290  : 

4,500    

2,879 
100 

Paraguay 

Uruguav 

2,283,039    

3.490 
22,992 
89' 186 

23,887 

6,827,428  : 

2. 004. 257    

93, 923 

1,618,214 

Total     South 

76,481.028    

7,579,936 

700,678 

142.873,234 

5,139,965 

1900 

1S95 
1895 

ECROFE. 

Austria-Hungary: 

Austria 

Hungarv 

Bosnia-Herzegovina 

9,511,170  '«  4, 749, 152 

0,605.365  ;  6  3, 499, 724 

c  1,417, 341  t 

1.710.488 
2, 308,  457 
d  239. 020 

20,323 
1)911 

2,621,026 
8,122,682 
3, 230, 720 

4, 682, 654 

7, 330, 343 

662, 242 

Total  Austria- 

17.533,876  ' 

4,264,571 

22,234 

13,974,428 

12,675,239 

'1906 
1S05 

1903 
1903 
1904 
'1906 
1904 
1905 
1902 
1904 
1900 
1901 
1906 

1904 
1900 

1900 

1906 
190(3 
1906 

1906 

'1906 
1905 
1905 
1906 

1906 
1906 

'  1905 

Belgium  

1,788,328          889,125 

h  1.596,267  .      i  442. 866 

1,840.466    al,089,073 

3,950    

245, 212 

536. 616 

486,935 

632 

315,535 

3, 169, 224 

4,267.403 

400 

159,068 

47, 545 

741,739 

19, 777 

3.879 

3,000 

295,277 

172.999 

90,000 

864,324 

/6,915 
11,828 

Q  235, 722 

8.081,816 

876, 830 

91,034 

936, 333 

17,783,209 

7,907,173 

1,046,519 

463, 241 

1, 456, 699 

15 

1,450,914    ol,066,251 
14.315.552  1  "7,515.564 
19,331,568  klO,  456,137 

215,910 

France 

198,865 

7,558,779 
18, 920, 666 

Greece 

406,744  

30,498 

88,869 

4, 568, 158 

;  495, 170 

k  6,900,000 

16,611 

18, 574 

400,000 

606, 785 

998, 819 

3,064,100 

5, 655, 444 

79, 716 

Italy 

*5, 000,000  ! 

327.276 

no 

2,968 

*  1.800.000 

Luxemburg 

92.381    

7,397  1 

91,799 
5,390 

Montenegro 

6O.000 ;     026.666 

1,090,403       "973,098 
950,201  1     a689,563 
817,000    

8,000 

861,840 

165. 348 

Portugal 

59,100 
515 

1,200,000 

Rouraania 

2,545,051           380,720 

1,709,205 

Russia: 

Russia  proper 

31.994.S49 

21.200.061 
1,309,640 
1,265,100 

"49.114.500 
"2,817,000 
0  6,957,954 

10, 372, 036 

2,414.61* 

800,470 

Northern  Caucasia. . 

3, 157,  358    



698, 335 

Total  Russia, 
European. .. 

1 
37,566,825         

23,834,801 

58,889,454 

11,870,841 

943.967  ;     » 153, 359 

2,075,142    

2,549,928    <»  1,763,857 
1,497,904        o 785, 577 

1     1,000,000  ;     0  300,000 

172. 278 
498, 157 
554.999 
135,091 

600,000 

130 

707, 570 

3,066,444 
13,025,512 

1,074,386 

209,243 

10,000,000 

875,517 

Spain 

1,743,863 

829,  S8S 

Switzerland 

3,136 

548, 355 

United  Kingdom: 

Great  Britain 

Ireland 

Isle    of    Man    and 
Channel  Islands... 

7,010,856    P  2, 738, 411 

4.038,924     Pi,  490.  284 

42.175  |       P  17, 591 

,  I  51  8, 1  81 
1531,858 

o  9. 485 



25, 420. 360 
3,  714,832 

74,843 

2,323,461 
1, 244, 193 

13,080 

Total   United 
Kingdom  . . . 

11. 091, 935    i>4.2.')2.286 

92,110,024 

29,210,035 

3, 5S0, 740 

Total  Europe  . 

126,786,377  i 

43, 589, 486 

|  1,489,416 

183.055,280 

67,707,570 

<>  Cows. 

i  Cows  over  1  year  old,  including  buffalo  cows. 

<•  Including  buiTaloes. 

*  Including  mules  and  asses. 

t  On  December  31  cf  preceding  year. 

/including  asses:  data  for  1S95" 

9  Data  for  1895. 

1  Census  data,  December  31,  1900. 

»  Cows,  census  data,  December  31,  1900. 


i  Excluding  lambs. 
*  Data  for  1890. 
i  Including  asses. 

m  Including  cows  kept  for  breeding  purposes. 
"Data  for  1905. 
o  Including  goats. 

P  Cows  and  heifers  in  milk  and  with  calf. 
2  Used  for  agriculture,  and  also  unbroken. 


634  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Lire  stock  of  countries  nam-cd — Continued. 


Year 


British  India  <: 1905 

n 1905 

Cochin  China 

Cyprus 1906 

Hongkong 1905 

Japanese  Empire: 

Japan 

Formosa 

Total   Ja] 


Java 

Labuan 

Philippine  Islands. 


Russia: 

Central  Asia  (4  prov- 
inces)   

Siberia  (4  provinces) 

scaucasia 

Other 


rotal  Russia, 
Asiatic 


1900 
1903 


1906 
1906 
1902 

1903 


Siam 

Straits  Settlements 1904 

Turkey,  Asiatic 


Total  Asia. 


AFRICA. 

Algeria 1905 

I  4und 1904 

British  Central  Africa..!  1906 

British  East  Africa j  1905 

Cape  of  Good  Hop.' 1904 

I 

German  East  Africa 1905 

:.  Southwest  Ai- 



Madagascar  ■ 

Mauritius  » 1905 

Mayotte (p) 

1905 

Orange  River  Colony. . .    1905 

Reunion I   (p) 

St.  Helena 1901 

Seychelles 1905 

Sierra  Leone i 

Southern   Nigeria    Col- 

-  >s) 1902 

Sudan       (Anglo-Egyp-  , 
tian)« 1905 

real 

Tunis 91905 

Total  Africa 


fcSS,920.714 

1,489,882 

109^000 

52,916 

976 


Total. 


Hairy 
cows. 


(-26,052,025 


Horses. 


Milks. 


1,433,458 

3.549 

11.243 

e 59. ICO 

193 


1.171.074 


33,154 


1.372.422 


1,269,602    '    1.372.4911 


2.000 


i 

2.343.000 


418.  400 

3 

144.171 


Sheep. 


2     _       7! 

■    I 


2 

3 


3,590 


290 


1.909.391 
1,624,000 


6, 955, 190 


1,104,751    . 
3,000,000   . 


35,812 

1,997 
BOO,  000 


109,017,228    ..-. 11,235,606 


1.066,404 

.  ; 

1,954.390 
350,000 
K 

I  90, 3S5 
2,867,612 

7.715 
47.S94 

525, 372 
4.  721? 
1.014 
1.000 


1.522 

314,990 
800.000 


540, 310 


c 32, 804 
el,  118, 162 


350,000 


221.140 

64,621 

14 

*186 

80.000 

73 

2    " 

1.074 

577 

21 

54. 637 

M 

1,780 

120 

150 

23 

10S 

9.314 

r 52, 159 

35. 596 


55.077 


174.234 
- 
18 


64, 433 
10,000 


(■143 
15 


r 44. 153 
15,995 


A  9.113,000 


24,631,258 


i  43.920 
45,000,000 


91.324.613 


9.062.036 
- 
S 
2.100.000 

- 


1,560,000 

333, 454 

124 

769,601 

4,194,247 

200 
741 

1,610 

1.421.721 
1,200,000 

1,094.761 


875.902  ,      316,760  i     33,766,531        1.635,139 


a  Including  Native  States,  as  far  as  officially 
shown.    Statistics  cover  onlv  six  districts  of  Ben- 
llected  between  18K)  aiid  1900. 

b  Including  buffalo  calves. 

cCows. 

a  Of  which  373,063  in  Alwar  include  goats. 

i  Including  mules  and  B 

I  less  than  1  year  old;  30  per  cent  may  Ik? 
added  for  those  less  than  1  year  old. 

p  On  December  31  of  preceding  vcar. 

h  Data  for  1903. 

< Including  goats. 

;'  Excluding  animals  owned  by  natives. 


*  Excluding  the  Province,  of  Jubaland. 

I  Excluding  the    'Windhuk   district,  in    which 
the  ca 
and  goats  al  - 

n>  Not  including  animals  in  the  public  service. 

n  On  su  -  only. 

o  Including  asses;  data  for  1904. 

p Latest    ol  ate    furnished 

French  emlv  ted  £         -.under  date 

..•4,  1905.' 

r  Animals  assessed  foi  I  tax. 

r  Data  for  1904. 


STATISTICS    OF   LIVE   STOCK. 
Live  stock  of  countries  named — Continued. 


635 


Argentina 
British  Guiana 
Chii 

Colombia 
Dutch  Guiana 
Paraguay 
Uruguay 
Venezuela 


Austria-Hungary 
Austria 

Hungary 
Bosnia-Herzegovina 


Total  Austria-Hungary 


"On  December  31  of  preceding  year. 

b  Not  including  northern  territory. 

c  Data  for  1905. 

d  Including  asses;  data  for  1905. 

'Latest  official  estimate  furnished  by  the 
French  embassy  to  ths  United  States,  under  da  to 
of  May  4,  1906. 


/  Including  animals  owned  by  Maoris. 

a  Including  asses. 

''On  farms. 

i  Census  for  1899. 

i  Data  for  1902. 


636  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Live  stock  of  countries  named — Continued. 


Country. 

Year. 

Asses. 

Buffaloes. 

Camels. 

Goats. 

Reindeer. 

EUROPE— continued. 

«1905 
1905 
1903 
1903 
1904 

al906 
1904 
1902 
1904 
1890 
1901 
1906 

257,669 

1.370,201 

38,984 

10 

6,499 

1,476,957 

3,329,881 

3,339.409 

401 

1,800,000 

14,203 

20,083 

100,000 

165,  497 

214, 594 

998,680 

232, 515 

124, 216 

6  431,487 

140, 104 

365, 181 

141,179 

Italy 

1,000,000 

3,818 

1904 
1900 

108,784 

146,500 

7, 186 



1900 

1905 
1905 

1905 

a  1906 
1905 
1905 
1906 

.. 

43, 475 

Russia: 

224,  .500 
1,000 

1 .  100, 500 
13,500 

347,000 

.  ' 



Total  Russia,  European. . 





225,500 

1,114,000 

347,000 

1,271 
663, 004 

1,652 

7,710 

495, 955 

2, 385, 664 

66,560 

359,913 

1,800 

2.524,186 

615,672 

227,300 

20,563,198 

595,888 

1905 
1904 
1903 
1905 
1904 

Q1906 
"1905 

ASIA. 

d  1,329,057 

14,849,189 
241,750 

424,747 

28,287,635 
153,542 

1,157 


e  250, 306 
164 

Japanese  Empire: 

226, 620 

72, 121 
117,214 



Total  Japanese  Empire. . . 

226,620 



189,335 

1900 
1903 

1903 
1903 
1902 
1903 

2,436,031 
/  640, 871 

124, 334 



Russia: 

Central  Asia  (4  provinces) 

365,000 

500 

17. 122 

296, 000 

775, 000 
230,000 
745,086 
802,000 

Siberia  (4  provinces) 

38, 700 

122,312 
58, 500 

338,042 

Other 

20,000 

180,812 

338,012 

678,622 

2,552,086 

58. TOO 

1,144,478 

Turkey,  Asiatic 

2,500,000 

9.000,000 

Total  Asia 

4, 009, 869 

19,876,981 

1,104,526 

40,557,402 

58,700 

1905 
1904 
1906 
1905 
1904 
1900 
1905 
1903 
1905 
1904 

AFRICA. 

277, 523 

i>  10 

86 

199,  715 

4,030,208 

A  1,625 

30, 238 

1,150,000 

7, 162,  463 

British  Central  Africa 

12 

British  East  Africa 

Cape  of  Good  Hope 

100, 470 
120,000 

8.777 
899 
411 

Egypt 

300. ooo 

40.000 
24 
3 

1,820,000 

»  100,118 

66,747 

5,223 

German  Southwest  Africa 

«On  December  31  of  preceding  year. 

b  Census  data,  December  31,  1900. 

c Including  Native  States,  as  far  as  officially 
shown.  Statistics  cover  only  six  districts  of  Ben- 
gal, collected  between  1890  and  1900. 

*l  Of  which,  62,652  in  Bengal,  Alwar,  Gwalior, 
and  Marwar  include  moles. 

«  Not  less  than  1  year  old;  30  percent  may  be 
added  for  those  less  than  1  year  old. 


/Carabaos. 

<i  Numbet  of  domesticated  elephants  returned 
as  2,036. 

h  Excluding  animals  owned  by  natives. 

i  Excluding  thg  Windhuk  district,  in  which 
the  cattle  were,  estimated  at  1,774  and  the  sheep 
and  goats  at.  2,P?0. 

i  Not  including  animals  in  the  public  service. 

*  On  sufar  estates  only. 


STATISTICS    OF    LIVE    STOCK. 
Lire  stock  of  countries  named — Continued. 


637 


Country. 

Year. 

Asses. 

Buffaloes. 

Camels. 

Goats. 

Reindeer. 

Africa — continued. 

1905 
1903 
(a-) 
1901 
1902 
1905 
1904 
«1905 

58 

1,792 

3,096 

1,916 

774 

1,508 

908, 791 

308,920 

4, 156 

1,001 

2,600 

1,329,711 

Natal 

:::::::::::.!:: 

Southern  Nigeria  Colony  (Lagos).. 

i 

c 92, 272 
33,013 
97,990 

132, 116 
949, 876 
147,229 

574, 2S1 

Total  Africa  

739,087 

300.012 

1,468,963 

17, 557,  SCO 



<H905 
1905 

dl905 
1905 

OCEANIA. 

Australia: 

853 

37,716 

26, 948 

17,980 

1,694 

1,953 

Tasmania 



Total   Aistralian    Corn- 

2,806 

84,338 

1904 
(«) 

1891 



Fiji 

1 

15, 361 
6,111 
9,055 

2,806 

114,865 

8,221,072 

20, 792, 665 

2, 803, 595 

90, 751, 486 

654, 588 

« Latest  official  estimate  furnished  by  the 
French  embassy  to  the  United  States,  under  date 
of  May  4,  1908. 

b  Animals  assessed  for  tribute  and  tax. 


<•  Including  mules. 

d  On  December  31  of  preceding  year. 

'  Including  animals  owned  by  Maoris. 


INTERNATIONAL  TRADE  IN  ANIMAL  PRODUCTS. 

MEAT. 

Value  of  imports  of  vuat  animals  ami  packing-house  products  into  thirteen  European 
countries  and  Cuba  in  1904,  and  percentages  derived  from  the  United  States. 


Importing  country. 


Imported  from  all  countries  by — 

United  Kingdom 

Germany  a  (for  consumption) 

Netherlands  (for  consumption) 

France  (for  consumption) 

Belgium  (for  consumption) 

Switzerland  (for  consumption) 

Austria-Hungary  (for  consumption) . 

Cuba 

Denmark  (for  consumption) 

Spain 

Italy  (for  consumption) 

Russia  (for  consumption)  (1903) 

Norway 

Sweden  (1903) 


Total 506, 715, 51 


Total  of 
three  fol- 
lowing col- 
umns. 


Dollars. 

283,158,215 

83,600,900 

28, 609,  594 

19,675,069 

15,93S,990 

15,881,517 

13,685.042 

13,011,989 

5,507,000 

7, 944; 070 

6,959,073 

4,784,578 

4,099,100 

3,860,369 


Live  meat 
animals. 


Dollars. 

50.263,256 

28,558,800 

253, 206 

7,008,413 

5,739,069 

10,352.595 

7,819,808 

6, 639, 536 

'  304, 100 

3,264,703 

1,244,792 

2,266,604 

468, 100 

130, 646 


124,313,748 


Packing- 
house 
products. 


Dollars. 
223.171,623 
43,472.200 
28, 230, 364 
9,842,335 
9, 098, 21S 
3,864,307 
4,712,938 
0,36S,05S 
5,135,300 
4,028.803 
5,646,  .532 
2,461,257 
3.577,500 
3;  637. 540 


353, 896, 975 


Poultry, 
game,  rab- 
bits, pig- 
eons, etc. 


Dollars. 

9, 723, 336 

11,569,900 

75, 964 

2,824,321 

501,703 

1,664,615 

1,152,296 

4,395 

67, 600 

650,  510 

67,749 

56,717 

53, 500 

92,183 


28,504.789 


63S 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Valu 


<  of  imports  of  meat  animals  aiui  packing-house  products  into  thirteen  European 
untries  and  Cuba  in  1904,  eind  percentages  derived  from  the  United  States — Con. 


Importing  country. 


Total  of 
three  fol- 
lowing col- 
umns. 


Live  meat 
animals. 


Packing- 
house 
products. 


Imported  from  the  United  States  by — 

United  Kingdom 

Germany  "  (for  consumption) 

Netherlands  (for  consumption) 

France  (for  consumption) 

Belgium  (for  consumption) 

Switzerland  (for  consumption  

Austria-Hungary  (for  consumption). 

Cuba .". 

Denmark  (for  consumption) 

Spain 

Italy  (for  consumption  

Russia  (for  consumption)  (1903) 

Norwa  v 

Sweden  (1903) 


Dollars. 

135,386,887 

_■   _>7.400 

16,336,441 

(») 
5, 90S.  315 
657.930 
1,683,826 
6,187 
(»> 

1,764,965 

S21.000 


Total I     194, 463, 457 


United  Kingdom. 

Germany  a 

Netherlands 

France 

Belgium 

Switzerland 

A  u  st  ria-Hunga  ry . 

Cuba 

Denmark 

Spain 

Italv 

Russia  (1995 

Norway 

Sweden  (IPC. 


Dollars. 
37.  066,  568 


970. 0S6 


1,919,460 


39, 956, 136 


Dollars. 

25.206,000 

16. 236, 433 

(») 

4,938.229 

4,264,011 
(b) 

•     1    . 

1 . 764. 965 

122. 268 

S2 1.000 


Poultry, 
game,  rab- 
bits, pig- 
eons, etc. 


Dollars. 

1,400 
8 
(ft) 
(ft) 

42 


4,197 


W 


(&) 


153,429,026  |      1,07 


Percentage  from  the  United  States. 


Per  cent. 
47.81 

30.15 
56.75 


(*>) 


37.07 
4.14 

12.30 
47.55 


(ft) 


Total. 


6.13 
25.36 

20.03 


Per  cent 
73.  74 


(ft) 


16.90 


2S.91 


(ft) 


c40.3S 


Per  cent. 

57.  P> 

57.41 

50.92 

17.  02 
35.73 
66.96 

12.08 

31.26 

4.97 

22:95 


Per  cent. 
11.03 


(ft) 
(*) 


95.49 


(ft) 


(ft) 


d4.30 


2  Not  including  fre- 
"a ted. 


c  Omitting  France  and  Denmark. 

4  Omitting  t  ranee,  Belgium,  Denmark,  and  Norway. 


TKADE   IN    WOOL. 


639 


WOOL. 

International  trade  in  uool,a  1901-1906.° 
EXPORTS. 


1     Year 

Country.             |    begin- 

|    ning— 

I                          I 
1901.                   1982.                   1S03. 

1904.                   19C5. 

Algeria 

Argentina 

Jan.     1 
Jan.      1 

Pounds. 
7,042,341 

503,443.071 
451,500,039 

Pon  nds. 

9,634,557 
436,374,060 
335,953,936 

Pounds. 

16,089,429 

425.407,795 

324,51-3,030 

51,450,971 

33,32 

79,093,393 

117.425,271 

42,214,830 

155,128,381 

9,257,920 

30,071,050 

25,090.103 

40,021,737 

33,950,200 

124,262 

179,055,000 

Pounds. 
21,519,315 

371,097,005 

395,130,825 
46,947,529 
3S;602,768 
78,411,050 

130,119.445 
33,032.572 

126,834,850 
7,952,000 
35,2- 

28,808,285 
40,621,737 
37,858,500 
99,148,465 

193,824,000 

Pounds. 
22,422,990 
421,098,234 

Jan.      1 
Apr.     1 
Jau.     1 
Jan.     1 
Jan.      1 
Jan.     1 
Jan.     1 
Jan.     1 

38,245,719 

48,506.045 

45,433,183 

19,051,756 
76,022,938 

103,001,990 
34,01-0,782 
146,820,079 

28,038,050 
96,957,471 
138,081,466 

36,231,009 
100,419,023 

Cape  of  Good  Hcpc... 

74,311  010 
116  405  477 

31,8 

139,912.737 

9,944,007 

c 31, 851,490 

c25  096  103 

Ppru 

8,6'i 

8,1   - 

Russia '.   

23,757,528 

20,459,512 
40,021,737 
20,205,000 
101,867,309 
120,423,000 

29,354,903 
25, 835;  16-5 
40,621,737 
37,204,S00 
95,637,488 
160,652,000 

Turtevd 

United  Kingdom 

Uruguay 

Mar.     1 
Jan.      1 
Jan.      1 

40,621,737 

35,251,500 

1 97,194,381 

170,398,000 

Total 

1,721,791.729      1.687.744.733 

1,658,746,881 

1,685,800,082 

1,741,070,909 

IMPORTS. 


Austria-Hungary 

Belgium 

British  India 

Canada 

Fiance 

Germany/ 

Japan. ." 

Netherlands 

Russia 

Sweden 

Switzerland 

United  Kingdom. 

United  States 

Other  countries . . 


J-m. 
Jan. 
Apr. 
July 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jar- 
Jan. 
Jan. 
July 


72,179,986 

118,479,050 

9,784.739 

10,360;738 

547,508,307 

370,476,806 

6,652,S76 

43,7:  _ 

58.0S7.S72 

8,499,894 

12,402,949 

421,520,875 

166,576,906 

53,000,000 


So, 970. 337 

122,180,634 

7,452,021 

7,994,702 

519,i52,S12 

416,038,627 

5,505,283 

45,4S1,019 

65,114,737 

9,809,111 

13,305,114 

392,752,036 

177,137,796 

58,692,000 


Total ' 1,899.383,416     1,926,586,229 


79 ,549, SI 7 

119,472,000 

7,431,310 

7,339,309 

523.823  309 

425,726,618 

7,282,080 

49,990,876 

71,607,060 

10,164,381 

13,465,390 

351  928,151 

173.7 

63,550,000 


1,905,085,195 


83,296.792 
117,205,945 
8,807  926 
7,017,211 
465,475,496 
413,781,976 
21,281.995 

50,207,0S4 
10,471,454 

14,139,564 
344,758,631 
249,135,746 

60,020,000 


1,S8S,S18,662 


79,440,467 

140,786,550 

13,741,761 

6,311,837 

479.8St-.7L4 
422,380,883 

14,085,397 

1,946 

10,349,336 

12,951,713 

371,364,280 

201,088,668 

20,150,000 


1,858,438,454 


a  Including  wool  combed,  carded,  and  dyed. 
b  See  ''General  note,"  p.  546. 
«  Preliminary  figures. 


d  Exports  for  1899,  the  latest  available  data. 
'Average,  1901-1904. 
/Not  including  free  ports. 


640 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AGRICULTURE. 


al 


—  o 


y    z. 

-" 

cS  * 

- 

?— 

-    = 

y. 

S  ■-. 

H 

=  ■7: 

-.  s 

^-  -_ 

g^a 

-    E 

.—   t* 

tQ<C 

m  __ 

c  c 

Eg 


S 


•=  r  -  DC  — !  —  — . 

■^.-c  -^  /.  :i  1^ 

S.   ~T   -7  ~    ■-   ^5 

"  ^- :-?  55  *  " 


-  '"  -r  t  t  r: 


•M  M  M  —  —  OC  -r  —  1  -  -r  - 


^  -?  >:  *  -  "•:  i  ^  -  i  :^  ■.:  c  r  -  -  i-  r:  :i  <-■;  z  c  "1  :j  - 
§  ='  2  do  e  i  •*  — i  —'  — "  to  ■£  -'.  r  J  —  -  i  -.  \  co  vi  c*      w  e "  00  — ' 


n  z  r-  -  -.;  ■ 


■1  ~  ~  7  ~ 

z;;r  :i-  ■_- 

1 3  ^ ;  i  1 

OB?  '  '  —  CO 

or.       n  -r 

-  ij  -)      ^  n 

r-i  -~:  1 


s  :i  t  -  /  r.  /.  -r  c  ^  y.  <5§«hV  r'j 


—  ,-•;:_;  =  r  v:  t  -  X  : 


'  rr  -  2  r-  "  5  %  >g 


w  o  r-  X  cc  *-*  cc 

2  «  -.;  K  •--.  —  a 
—  -1  o  —  -r  ua  BO 

to  >*  0  ■©  ='  >d  o 

ri  dc  c       >:  "0 
WO><0       'J-W 

.-I  «  


>  §  C  X  O  <*  <-~.  X  '>. 

'  •"  -  ~.  5.  10  N  o  CO  i~ 
'«S       so  1-      —  ci  n 


p,  -  ■  2    r 

:  c  — I  :-  — i   '  —  0 


— — 
-  - 


K     ^  -  7  —  —  -  —     —  —  x  z  —  —  u  u  -  —  x  -  o  -  —  — 


— .        — .  ■-- 


Ho 


TRADE    IN    HIDES    AND    SKINS. 


641 


HiSUMffiHMCeCO: 


o-i  co  co  —  o  ~i  g  >  ~  c  K  PC  r-  c-i  co  co 

NC,ircc^io»oi*o;,vor-.ccort 


i  o  — -  ~  > "  -r  >"  i  -  en  co  < 


:  ./-  —  —  'C  re  i-  i 


■  :o  o  :■:  o  ^  --T  —  ~*  'O  'O  • 


«eor<  ft 


^f-»ofo,r^MOc^c:(M'H^,,i''-'OOr-X'C:c;cociogC'Cco»0'fl"*rriocirHoc©CN(N; 
r^cr  co  »o  r-'  --5  r-T  ic  co  oco  *■£■  ^  i~*  10:1 o  :/  ~>  >~  o  >o  c:  —  c)  co  i"V  h  r-  r-  ^  -x  oj  -^  ^  n  c  c  c  c  ^  10 10 

•0  O  CO  :C  U  O  O  O  O  <C  CN  <M  T  O        P3t-reOCH0  1>tOnr-iOCS  CC  CO  OO  I-         OKK-SfClOOKC 

incvriocsicoi'*      oo  ^  co"-*      -£■*<      co      >o  co"     r?c*T     t-Z  c-i  to '■£ -*f  c\ '~  ci  ■■£  *-~. 


•o  coco  t 


C-l 


lO 


s 


01 


CN         CO 


i-l         iH«M 


CO  O 
.—  CI 


O  (/■  O  Oi  CI  O  C  C  O  T  -  'f  X  ^  1*  *C  ''  O  O  O  iC  «  C)  CO  O  N  C)  0!  »  H  C  C 
O  O  'O  O  I  -  r-  ~-  O  T1  —  '-C  CI  -T-  CM  — '  CT  co  u  c  C  T  C  "  iO  0  '  >C  '"    X  -hC-CO  ; 

i— ( t-  c:  ^  oo  oo  co  co  c»  co  i.o  -  ^  l:  x  ci  ^  c  ■;  :i  «c  c-  ci  x  c  c  c  ^  -"O  -< » 


'OI^CC-.^C-I' 


<ri  £3  co  i-ncctccocio^^t-o  o  *c  »-o  —  co  ci  h-  Xi  'O  o  n  ^  co  o  c:  rcn-  c  t  a  't  -i1  x  c  * 
S  -p  ■-  rn  'Oi-  —  o  o  to  —  —  — .  —  —  i  -  oi  -z.  ci  ci  -.-  r-.  ci  — -  co  c  "  c  q  ci  ^  i-  c  n  t  y  c  o  -  t 
-  —  co       n  i  -  x  c  o  ;o  i  -  >c  -r  ci  -^  —  r-  r~z  *«r  co co       oocr^ocooo  cm  cm 


co  ci       .-<  >o  o  C*  c:  r-  oc  tN  »-0  t 


OhMCI'-iv; 

■  -  r/;.  f_  CO  i—i  —<  O  CJ.  V:  C  C)  -  -  -^  CO  CO  O 


XOt-MOX'NCO.COQ^MNaC'lOCCOr-C 

to  o  —  — ■  »c  o  cc  —  i  -  r>:  -+<  -~  \z  »o  oi  ~  oc>  ■n'f  c 
©©oo»ocoa5wcN«5»o^coHt*H'*t^enc 


co  -.0  o  o  cr.  co  x  x  o  *  oo  — — f  x  --C  r 


MCaOCOCCNOMNOOl 


:  O  f-  O  *-  -h  .— 1  CO  CI  i-0  00  ^  GC  ^  iO  t  -  O  ^  r—  'O  CO  ^  o  CO 

*  o  o  co  o  ci  'Co  ic  x  -^  r-  -h  ci  -cjtoi  »o  co  t  co  to  c  ci 
.^Ni-iWM  ci  cr-  c.  ^  -rji  *r  c  'v  t  w  »o  o  c  ic  q  w  cm 


C-  y.  Ti  CO  CO  C)  t—  — '  o  »o 

JT  O  01  CO  ■—   r~  .-^   i.-   ■—   T1 
■[•-•^OOCOOOOCOCICC' 

r  -*  1-3  «3  O  »H  O  -h*  — '  ^r 
CO  <S  i-t  r-l  l^  ^H 


XM^Nh.'fHrocc'/^  :■:  cr.  -^  —  -rr  or  or  co  o  r;  r  -  "/:  c  i  -~  ct  o  — <  co 


O  as  oo  -^  - 


hNXCn( 


coo  Oh-  c 

*^r  i-t  o  -.c  : 


ro  >o  c  iO'  o 

lOOCD^OXClMCl 

o  ^  oo  >o  -«r  co"co*^co 


w    CD     - 


U     O     C  ^ ^,3    H     ,3;   •-■     — '  •-.  ^-     r--   — .     C '  ^   4-J 


—1  ™~_i 


881 


C-  <U  I-l 

tt  il  c 

cv  &  R 

'r»    >  3 


oS       d       ci 


10 

p, 

r 

■« 

li 

0 

- 

c- 

0. 

Fl 

a 

c 

H3 

cd 

,S 

O 

c 

-- 

S 

c 

•7. 

.  O  m 

* 

e 

A 

" 

3    A1006 41 


I2;     ft     rt     55     cq 


642 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTET.E. 


-'  u'  c  '->*■--*  —     '     '    -   *     ~~    -  ' '   3     * 
-     ■   r        -  -  ■  - ".  ~   :     "  — 

-:  r  -'    -t  —  tt-— '-' 


■  —  —  —  -     f  —  r  re  —  -    —    ■    - 
—  ^  —  ■  ■  -    _ 

-     -      -    T    T     -    —    -      - 


,_-_-     _-.-■-: 

■    -   :  ■    -  -      -         '-    -   —         ■: 

-■'—--'—  T.  1Z~    ''  T-'        ~    — I  K      "'    -* 


-  —  - 


DO  oo  —       r "    " 


.-  -    ■  -  -    -  - 


r »       CO  —  -' 


-  —    -    •  -   y 


-  ~  -  - 


.■.-.-:-::  = 


noa x r  -  - :  — 

-'  i  -  - 

1  -  T. 

_-'  — '  .'"      - '  — '  — ' 


-  —  r  —  =:        v     -  - 


:£  cf  30  - "  -*       r"  -  •* 

-   _       -    _  _ 


■  -      re 


- 


-  '-      — 


-  r 


\H  i:    -L-    -   z.  -  ~. 

-  . .  -    — ;      — : 

r   -  _  c  —  _; 


■ ^  —  —  r.  — 

—  -  -:  —  CI  (*  t~ 

-'  r±  ■/  -~  — '  t  --'      '-'--/—  -c 

—                 -    —          Z                             "    -    —     * 
-    -    -   -:  —  c     ■ ': 


-  -    -   - 

:  i      —  s~ 


-- 

-  -_ 

-  ^ 

^  3 

a  i. 

ss 

£  £ 

|32 


3  --.  —  '--      - 
©  ad      ea      =" 


—  .     —  "  ~  —-T- 


-  —  "—:-_  —  -  ::  — 


1      -       —    — 


TKADE    IN    HIDES   AND    SKINS. 


643 


co  oo  «-<  oo  ©  »o 

§1-  CO  O  O  CO 
r*»  QU  uO  "^f  © 


r>  C  x  ro  r-  i  -  --<  i~  ^  o 

Oi-OWQiOaOOOV 


O  ^  ©  ©  ©  "O 
-h  O  1^-  CO  T  O 
CO  ©  ©  T-  .  -  © 

u?  :c  cT  oo? '  p  g? 

^  Cl  X  I-  CI  o 


co  Jc  c  J  ©  <  -  co  -ni  i  -  co  ^r 

nOOiXi^T  c-i  —   ~   JO 

■  5  cl  rf  co  >0  "rVrco"  © 


NOOONOCO 
)  ©  00  L  ~  —1 


co  ©  ©  oo  i  -  »-!       i.^x-jxi  ■  ©  jo  h  tt  r- 


Cl  — '  «-*  — •  CN  CO 

on  x  '  -  co  ci  -<r 

CO  •*  ©  ©  CO  l- 

CN?cooror>o  ©"-s*" 

V,  70  rn^Clf-* 


iHtb'VHcom 


to  ©  cc  cc  ©  co  on 

tH-^cMlOCHjOM^^O 

^crcf  co  to*  ao'ift'Oco 

H  CO 


"v  ©  t  ©  co  © 


o  — i  eo  r-C»eo^* Oa©  oi 


X'  o  ■**  CO  ©  CO 

I—  TT  O  K~  CO  O 

oscl  oi  —  -J  © 


©  ©  ©  ©  —  >  c  "  lc  cc  t  ^ 
CI  CC  *-»  O  ^  O  CO  ©  CO  co 


©  r  i  -*r  co  —  -r  x  io  OS 


>Oogo3!      co  >-o  co  en  ci  ©  co  ©  oi  uo 


-J  CJ  X  i*  N  OO 


.  <  -  >-0  OI  i  -  CO  V       . 

•  ■  i  .  :  c  i  —  co  CN  00  O 


X  31  31  ©  O  O         ■^rMOCO^HC/jCl 
CJOX^CIO 

to^to <-rcr ©  © 

01  7-1  01  t-  CN  O 


co  --<  ©  rr  ©  o  '  ■  ■* © © 
-r  M  ©  co  t—  -j.  ©  i*  '-c  i~ 

«<•  r  — *  ro  ©*  ©*  oo  —  © 


©  0  I  CO  —  CO  > 

—  ©  »  l-»  CN  ■: 


^hOO       "©  ©  ©  CC  -0  ©  ©  ©  30  h. 

co  ©  to  ■—  x  — ■  ©  h  —  ^o 

riOiiXi-HMOi»-tl-g0 
"©CO 

so  ■- 

5  DO 


r-  -T  0  I  f-h  ©  '  - 
©  l  -  NN^^l 
CO  t*^  ©  V  ^C  t-- 


•   _ 


crir-n>.Hoo 


OOOOnd 


-  cd  ia 

c~o£ 

c3  go  m 
PtPtf-, 

©       W       ^J 


§  :J  O  W  ^  : 


cd  S  fl  . .  —  *^  cv  o  X  3  S  S  c 

•3 


o  ich  f  o  ;r  ^h  n  e>  ci  n  o  i*  w  h  H  c>  co  co  m  o  O  oi 


Ol  ©  i-t  »-*  t^  I-  t--  *o 


C"?  ■_  'O  CO  (MOuj^  CN  l-'J  ,<r  O  vj 


OfOOOCI 

©  ©  ^  *o  -^  co  ci  t'  w  ©  ©  ci  or ■  oo  o-i      ©  *-*  uo  co  >o  » 


<  i-  l>  CO  00  CO  C  O  O  T  'X  O  C)  Ol 

--oio>ox.  ■  — 


oo  t-o  m  ci  t^.  ^  ^p      t^  co ' 


X  31  'O  T  O  C  Cl  CO  1*  Cl  r-  T  O  O  lO  ph  CO  CI  C-'TO  X>  O  O      +^ 


»— t  uo  uo  *^  cc  >  ;  o  ©  rc  omooi^h 

h-  N  X  TV  X  J  O  V  CO  C  J  COMtOf^tlQ  33 


i  00  «C   —  CN  t^ 


'~  —    f   i-  00  ©  :"   —  30  —  ©  "-3  Oi  ©  ©  C.  ©  ©  01  ©  tt  ©  CO  ^ 

c:  tj«  ©  tt  oo  —j  *o  --  oi  -v  cc  <o  _:   _"  jc  j    —    ~.  i-  r-»  —  co  ©  ri 

tt  ^r  co  co  t.;  o  ^  ©  co  ©  to  rr  ©  oo  r-       ©  oo  co  co  c-i  ©  ©  "^f 

i-T^h  © r-Tr-T         ^©"•.oTc-rof©"'— Tto"     tCtCTjT     tociof  ^ 


i  00  M  Cl  N  T  CO  <~i  O  CO  CJ  co  a>  O  N  o 

t^  r-  c-  ci  -^r  co  c  t  ©  c  ©  c )  ©  xxo  oo 


^-.o  ^  co  t-:  t-  cn  -o 

MS  CD 


^  S_  0  I  0  II 

J  »o  CO  —  I 


^r  ct-  w  ©  r^>  >P 


•hooO'/  o i  y  on  ©  ©  oi  o  o  o 


-  CO  »0  i-h  LO  i-i  oo 


y—.  i-(  CM  CO  --1 


r ,  ■ 

?i  ©  ; 
©  co  : 

cTto  ocTc-l  loT'-T'oT 


VhC.NO 

M^TJIfCOl 

^^•©©  © 
'^     cTcooj 


(OiOh-Vl:  CO  X1  Ot  CO  Ol  00  »—  >-o  CO  © 
CC  to  'O  ©  t.0  00  t,  00  1--  ©  X   X  ©  ©  h-  CN 

c  »-<  ©  ©  co  ©  !-•  ootf-ieoTr  do  -c  x  ^r 


©  Ol  ^r  CO  CO 

•v  -T  X  CI  C] 

r-  v  i-"  f-^  it* 


01  ©  o/.  ©  t-  ©  'O  ©  ©  r-  ;-  r-  ro>  v  ©  co 

-r1  CO  cc  to  r  i  t  -  r  -  r-  ©  t  -  01  ©  — «  »-*  CO  C*J 
©©©■^."■©w  t—  CO^T-— i  •*!«  ©  l>.  E^-         ' 

h  cfooV?  ©  to  uoT©  oo"     cf     v 


©  0-1  ©  CC  '-O 

O  — »  OT  CN 
^  CO  Ol  t-O  00  © 


O         ©  CO  00 


co  t-o  <N  ^r  03  ©  »o  co  -t'  ©  r-  ©  ©  ©  co  to  t—  h  »-.  co  © 

tji  lo  h  ^  lo  o  t  o  *  t  r-  cr..  u;  r-  co  v  co  oo  i^  oo  © 

»-»©©.— t©.— »ooi^»©©r--  c-i  ©©to©  ^t"  ©  •—  ci  t-- 

oi  rc  ci  co  io  ©  co  ©  ©  ©  ©  ©  io' oi  ©  «o  t--"or©co  ©" 

r-  o  i  ocoHru-c  ©coec  ©  oi  ©  oj  t^ h  >o  <o  oi  'O 

OC  CO  r-t  o  ©  O  r-t  00  OI  CO  ©  ©  CO  CO  i— <         Q  ^°  CI  ©  ©  o 


CN  - 


i-i      ©  h 


CN 


■ssS-Sci 

*o  be. 


-I 


g  -o  -a  -c  « 


4  &6. 4 


tk^^■^->6'S2,•_;soa'!ba',1'    r  a?,J  t^    •  C  W)  o  "U 


Mb 

"•S3 

-.  u  o 


_g  g  OS 


d  ^<  ^ 

M    0J  « 

9  >  k 


644  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


a  c  —  ■—  --.  —  T-  o  ^  X  .--  — x  :-  — .  —  —  x  r:  r~  -  -r   -  x  r-  r 

re  —  c:^^  —  —  £  "V  O  c->  £  r  — 
CODOOONNV  X  —  —  re  re  T 

c 

-. 

-., :  ■  -  -r  x  —  7    x  - :  —  -r  c  -    =  "  —  r    ^  —  c  d  -  -  —  s  —       —  .--:  r  <  rr 

-i r     -  —  r:  -  -  -  —  -    —  ::  x  c  : ic  —  x  -c x       x  —  .- 

-  —  :■:.  s  77.        --.  X  :  -  K  ~  -  .  —  —  ~r  —  I-       ».-  DC  r-  C  -  —                  IQ 

ae    :.-:-.  —       -r .-       ncooo      t-      =.      —  n  X  -r                    CI 
2  r.  —    -  —  —           ci               re                    ci      ci 

t^rixc  c  r.  *  r.  z  r  L*  r.  ^  c 
U2  re  rj  x  —  —  re  »C  N  r-  ^  *-~  rj-  ^ 

BC  —  ~-  —  J~-  K  C  —         Q^CO 

,2  —  X '  — ■" :-  r  J  —  — *  a  ^  -~  —  ■-£  •-  CE  —  rf  cT—  r — foon       ~    -  -r 
5cnoor-  =  o«c    honsoonno      =  x  — .  r ;  -t       re  —  -r 

-  —  :  -  —  c  : ;       —  —  —  ^~  c  x  a      x  :~  —       r ,  c:  x  x  ?  i               -^ 

•:  :.  —      -r . .-::-:    r.       ~.       x        '                                  ci 

.-■---—             ci                  -r                                  :; 

—  — 

C  :  -  :e  x  —  i3  f-  ■»  X  re  -i  re  «C  ci 

o'coc      -  —  -•-  ?"  :~  —  r  -  •>  :"  re 
~  _  -    -    -e  -e  x  —  re  —  x  r-  o  Ci 

■:  -  7  -  C  /.  :~  K3  S^CO^COOO 

c  ^  -   -  r.   *  -  -  -  "  >  v: 

ri 

-  ~-  occ    ""       —   -    -  ~"  c    "■  —  —  ic  —    ~      f-  :jz  3  —  ~.      —  ~  ^ 
2  x"  B i  c '  u  a      -r  ='      — '  >o  - .:  C;      — ■       go      —  —  --.  7'                   T-. 

— "  so  rr"  —  x  — "  :  i  :-*  —  ~  —  :r  x  r- 
^  —  -     -  e*  l -~  —  r-  —    -  re  c 

- 

30!      '■  ■    -     >:.r. 
—  *-e  —  r,  —      —  -r      ooqoo 

-• 
£ 

x"mc .r  ~  x  ;  -  x  — 

;   -        :so«i3vco««oxx  >= 
. x*t  —  c:  —  xxr-r  —  —  _--  -  r 

■Q  ^  I""  i  S£  ~  :^  Z" '  Z-   '.-    ~  ~~  ~~  r--  '  ' 

~  x;  ~  c  —  "    -     —  '.  '   ~.  ~  -    -    77    -.  — 

~  -■  s   ;  r    x       -:           :     ".  K  =      •»      «: 

g  -    —    -  "                  7 1                r :                      : 

X 

■ 

Vi  17. 787 
878,708 
880, 102 
050,709 
455,300 

2,222 
422,1135 

045,600 

?,  191 
722,428 
820,02  • 
831,901 

275,333 

704, 130 
670,710 
546,  1  18 
686,012 
036,946 

064,634 

(110, 325 

11  1,070 
840,308 

->.  =  :.-':--.- 

- 

DC  X  C: 

-  —    -  —  :  -  r.  r-  —  r.  -;  r;  ;-  3  —  t-  -i  x 

-  *     ~    ^    ~    :  1 C  —  —  "-  :     C  :-"".  —  ■  - 

g 

••• 

,062 
,306 

,01  E 

,045 
77(1 
,  827 
,008 

.133 
,114(1 

,  Ifl7 

,  1  5.r. 
,533 
,340 
,717 
,1133 

,507 

B2S 

■  77.  1--  :  - 

~  —  —  x  r  -  —  xz  —  c  ; 


z  :  x  —  -r  . 


'■  t-  "  "  ^  —  ^ 

ia  '•-  x  x  E 
—  d    -  x  -Tri  t-  : 


e    - 

e      -. 

V.  — 


:  -  -      ~"  ■- 


-  =■  - 


5-   X  ^7      .  .77  ^7 


BJ  „  r.  t,  a    .  ■- 
-7~  77   7^  x  —  ~   - 

-U-aOoCC 


-      -        •=  Z        X      - 


—     '7-S.S.  — 


TRADE    LN    HIDES    AND    SKINS. 


645 


i  is  x  —  L~      —  h*  oc  S  co  eo  "** 

Ci  Ci  CO  00         CO  OC  74  Cl  oc  CI  o 


n^cxmc  oi 

/  c  tt  '^  oi  co  cc 
oa  3a  oa  to  —  w  to 


)  oo  o  oo  t>»  *-*  ^-i  ua 


:■-  "  r-  re        cc 

od'oTj-TcJ     io* 


oo  t1  r-  r-  o  —  — •  ^  to       »-h 
•^     <co"^ooo"ocV-Tc>r 


wowv 


'  00  NOC  OC 

-"  TT  -^O  CC 

CO  "cf  QO--< 


i  c  "j\  o 


^  ■*  ^  o  ■"*•  C.'-O 
EC  DQNQOC  X 
CC  CN  "0  0C  CO  CI  CO 


<  cn  cd  rc  *  t 


CJO  Co         .-1 


: .— .  c-i  -<r  or-  -^ 
:  ci  o  oc  -^  t-  ON) 


o  -"  co  — «  a*,  r-  cc 


<*  Ci  ca  ^h  Oa  OD  O  r-  ( 


IQ00OM        CO        O^'OT'w©' 


o  "^r  oc  co      oc      o 


)  o  to  o  — <  c-- 


,-<  Tf<   -H   O 


cc  -c  x  c  r~  s  o 

r-xcot'j'io 

03  X  OC  00  "^  CO  <N 


Tf  cc  cc  t-  cc  — i  o 
rtO»ON<OHH 

Ci  cn  —  3a  —  O  — 


c:  x  '*  oi  x  —  'C  r-  oc 

d  CO   -C   ■'■  '"  01  t~TT  — < 

GCXr-OtCCOTCOCC 


—>  Ol  CO  O) 


00  CO 


C    —  i:  T-.NNM         CONM005- 1  £ 


O  O  <C  l>  K) 

r-t  C5  o  ci  **- 


r  -  t  — ■  o  C  x  re  — '  : " 
X  T  r-  *C  O  CI  X  CO  r- 


;  o  o  (^  c  h  co 


)0>00        OC^CO^CjO 


cj  i-  **r  "*!• 


o;jho      o  io  oi  n  o  a  io 
o  --      C3      co      -""p  oa  w*a*  «c 


ic  ^  co  --•  cc Co  O       -^r  oc  r-  oo  -o  co  co  oo  ci 
CC  C  ^-  O  cc  OJ  00        CO  O  C-  Ol  — <  '  r  -o  rc  O 

Ci  *  r-  -v  c  ^r  o        «  x  Ol    .'«CNHH 


rH  T-t  CO 


01  t-  Tf  CO  ^  •— i  CI 

0  !  ,-i  l  "   ?  J  CI  O 


Cl   X 

x  >.o 
O  oo 


r-  t-x?i  x  '••  t- 

u0  O-O  lOOOl'T 

oo  — '  ~"r-"eT'-^oo 


c;  -**  cc  o 

— <  "0  OO  CO 

co  to  ee  r  - 

ocTi- co" 


r-  co  cc  t-  ci  ^  ci 


oa  co  -o  ic  'O  o  oa 


'38  II 


X  -«r  ci  cc  ex  co  r- 


co  oi  ci  '-o  o  r-  x  x  ~ 
co  c )  O  cc  c  -  o  r  t  o  x 

hh5hCN  -T  -?'  CC 


oc  -f  oo  i— <  co  t~-  — * 

CT-  *?  *0  — <  to        co 
ci  t  oo  o       u5 

oTco^T-h      cf 


t--  X'  -r  t-  cj  ~  o  w  — < 

t  XNNWClNrtC 
CC  "f  Oi  X  O  OC  r 1  iQ 

■*      co  ic"o"W  cT— Ti-^ 


cj  c; 


;S5 

O  o. 


~  ir.—  — 


■a 

3 


r.  «   -■'  si  JS  ~ 

!  O  fi  O  oa  aj  P 


) 

c 
X 

1 

3 
C 
— 

0  d- 


OdSC 


^3  oj  =3^3  c  q\  q;  ^ 


'■5  h 


ZPh 


646 


YEARBOOK  lRTMENT    OF   AGEICTTLIV  _ 


BUTTEJ 

Intcrnatio 

exports. 


:.:m 

Denmark 
i 



untries 


Australia Jan.  1 

-     m Jan.  1 

Jan.  1 

f  Good  Hope. ..  Jan.  1 

Raich  .                   ...  Jan.  l 

Jan.  1 

Jan.  1 



Natal 

tiands Jan.  1 

Jan.  1 

la 

Jan.  1 

Transvaal Jan.  1 

Kingdom Jan.  1 






: 
.     .. 

; 
I  i 

- 


- 

: 

-     ..     .    , 


" 


- 

"      -■ 

.     - 
121,121 

; 

14. r. 


.     ■" 

■ "  -.- 
..  .  . 

173    ■■• 

-    . 


-    - 


!    -         - 
-- 

-  -    -     ■ 

-  -- 
- 

v. 

-    - 


•:._••  j.y  _.:- 


tP«  ares.         • 


TBADE    IX    CHEESE. 


647 


CHEESE. 
International  track  in  cheese,  1901-1906.a 


EXPORTS. 


Country. 


Year  be- 
ginning— 


1902. 


Bulgaria. 

Canada 

Franco 

Germany  & 

Italy 

Netherlands 

New  Zealand... 

Russia. 

Switzerland 

United  States.. 
Other  countries. 


Jan.     1 
July     1 

Jan.     1 


Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 


Jan.     1 


Jan. 

July 


Pounds. 
6.449,020 

17.7y.-i.274 
3,211,683 

24,104,435 
104,269,090 

11,680,928 
1,610,414 

60,075,729 

27.203.184 
7,924,000 


Pounds. 

5,651,335 

229,099,925 

20,545,803 

3,119,981 

28,841,967 

104,785,152 

54,  491 .  422 
18,987,  ITS 
9,469,000 


1903. 


1904. 


1905 


Pounds. 

7,064,3S5 

233, 9S0. 716 

23,119.970 

2,813.539 

33,158,617 

109. 025.96S 

8,375,360 

1,41 

12,863 
23,335. 172 
8,833,000 


Pounds. 
6,624,517 

215,733,259 
20,711,480 

30,299,443 
103,089,081 

9,466,912 
1,396,951 

- 
10. 134.-124 
7,050,000 


Pounds. 
7,227 

34,543 

22, 125, 152 

2.0.50,397 

c 37, 694, 647 

98,438,575 

9,918,944 

*  1,119, 497 

61,383,731 

16,562,451 

co,  092.000 


Total I :    465,279,188       485,0 


504,756,147       463,772,9S3|      478.047.753 


IMPORTS. 


Argentina 

Australia 

Austria-Hungary. . 

Belgium 

Brazil . ._ 

Cape  of  Good  Hope. .. 

Cuba 

Denmark 

Egypt 

i>  ranee 

Germany  & 

Italy 

Russia 

Spain 

Switzerland 

United  Kingdom . . . 

United  States 

Other  countries 


Total. 


Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan. 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  l 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  l 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  1 
Jan.  1 
July     1 


2,777,464 

-   i 

3,268,640 

3,256,525 

2,140,688 
6,702,653 
42,034,436 
36,750,387 
10,797,577 
2,852,694 
4.129.100 
4,248,748 

17,067,714 

11,092,000 


467,488,204 


3,614 
2,318 
7,263 

25,776 
3,062, 

3,689, 
3, 119, 
2,085, 

6.947, 

I        . 

35,067, 

8,859, 

4,280, 

5. 710. 
279,367 
20,671 
14,598 


,879 
,110 
,348 
,099 
,639 
,  35 
835 
131 

70s 
780 
820 
053 
871 
926 
853 
088 
384 
0»  I 


2,489,821 
1,141,300 

7.. 127. 020 
27,994,030 
2,90 

4,251,460 

2,900,902 

2,052,503 

6,947.710 

48,434,148 

35,859,059 

9,474,363 

3, 191. 252 

4,033,420 

5,879,065 

29*3, 012, 52S 

22.707.103 

14,549,000 


471,625,259       498,348,220 


I 
375,642 

26,304,868 

3,043,516 

3,994.730 

3,333,992 

2,033,764 

8,495,738 

40,683,327 

39,750,657 

9,568,500 

3,302,985 

1,338,306 

6,567,789 

280, 125. 104 

23,095,705 

18,7S5,000 


4,234,616 

384,718 
9,3.58,179 
28,48 

c  3, 119,540 

3,249,035 

<*  3, 152,814 

7.472,566 

9,512,371 

43,254,168 

44,698,270 

c 9, 921, S01 

744,573 

c 4, 033, 420 

5,530,515 

267,722,560 

27,286,81  6 

c  12,  413,000 


486, 082, 3S6 


480,577,969 


a  See  "  General  note,"  p  546. 
6  Not  including  free  ports. 


g  Preliminary  figures. 
d  Average,  1901-1904. 


64S 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


FARM  ANIMALS  AND  THEIR  PRODUCTS  IN  CONTINENTAL  UNITED   STATES. 

HORSES  AND  MULES. 

Number  and  farm  value  of  horses  and  mil  1907. 


Horses. 

Mules. 

January  1 — 

Number. 

Price  per 
head. 

Farm  \ 

Number. 

Price  per 
head. 

Farm  value. 

1867  

5,401,263 

2,793 
8,248,800 
8,702,000 

0,900 

q  222.470 
9,333,800 
9,504,200 
9,735.300 
10,155,400 
10.329.700 
10,938,700 
11. 201.  St  10 
11,429,626 
10,521,554 
10,838,111 
11,169,683 
11,564,572 
12,077 
12.  49-5.  744 
13.172,936 
13,663,294 
14,213,837 
14,056,750 
15,498.140 
16, 2«  • 

16,081,139 
IS  893,318 
15.124.057 
14.3- 4."  ; 
13,960,911 
".307 
13,537,524 
16. 744. 723 
16.. 531.  224 
L6,  557,373 
16,7 

17,057,702 
18,718,578 
19,7*    38 

859. 05 
54.27 
62.57 
! 

71.14 
67.  il 

65.15 

61.10 
.57. 29 

■'   -  ! 
56.  63 
52.  36 

54.  7.5 
58.  44 

•S..-3 

74.  64 
73.70 
71.27 
72.15 

71.82 

68  ^4 
x     67.00 
65.01 
61.22 
47.83 
36. 29 
33.07 
31.51 
34.  26 
37.  40 
44.  61 
52   - 
58.61 

67. 93 
70.37 

93.51 

S318.924.0S5 

312.4: 

396,222,359 

556,250.529 
619,038.564 
606.111.449 
1  12,273,159 
608,072,797 
580,707,854 
557. : 

567,016,871 
584,998,503 
572,712,085 
613, 2%,  611  J 
667,954,325 
61.5.824,914 
765,04].30v 
833,734.400 
852,282,947 
S60,823.208 
901.1  ^ 
946,096,154 
VS2.194.S27 
978,516.562 
941,82     . 
1.007.593,636 
992.  225.lv, 

: 

576. : 

500,140,186 

452,1 

478,3  - 

511.074. 813 

603.' 

885,200,168 

968.935,178 
1.030.705.9.59 
1,136,940,2!  g 
L2iW.310.020 
1,510,8* 
1,846,578,412 

822,386 

921 . 662 
1.179.  .500 
1  242,300 

1,276.300 

i,3io;ooo 

1.339,350 

1  393,750 
1,414,500 

1,637,500 

1,713.100 
1,729,500 

1.83.5.1(9 
1,871,079 

1.914.126 
1,972,569 
2.052.593 
2.117.141 
2.191.727 
2.2.57.574 
2.331.027 
2,296,532 
2,314,699 
2,331,128 
2.352.23! 

.    27 

a  . 

2,190,282 

2.134.213 

2  -      27 
2,864,458 

2   72 
2,757,916 

2   •  •  -   7 
3.404,361 

- 

(66. 64 

56.04 
79.  23 
90.42 
91.98 
87.14 
85.15 
81.35 
71.89 

64. 07 
62.03 

56.00 
61.26 
09.  79 
71. 35 
79.49 
S4.  22 
82. 3S 
79.  CO 
78.91 
79.78 
79.  49 
78.25 
77.88 

70.68 
62.17 
47.55 
45.29 
41.66 
43.88 
44.96 
53.55 
63.97 
67.61 
72.  49 
78  38 

1 

■ 
112. 16 

Sm."  -   -  J 

1869       

47. 
73.026.906 

1870 

106.  "54.015 

1871 

115,272.194 

1S72 

111,221.919 

1873 

1874 

111.546.171 
108, 

1875 

197,044 

1876 

94,000,976 

1S77 

92,481,931 

1878       

101.579.278 

1879                                

(41,589 

1880              

1"".94S.319 

1881              

120,0 

18S2 

130. 

18s3                     

148,732,390 

1SS4 

161,214,976 

1885        

162,497,097 

1886              

163.381,096 

167.057.538 

1888             

174,853,563 

1880        

179.444.4S1 

1890  .           

182,394,099 

1891 

178,847,370 

1892        

174.882.070 

1893 

164,763,751 

1S94       

146,2 

1895 

110,927  -  4 

1896 

103,204.457 

ISi'T               

92,302,090 

189^       

109.516 

1S99 

• 

1900 

111,3 

1901         

183,2   _   . 

1902                  

411.704 

1903 

197.753.327 

1904     

217   ■ 

1S05            

251,  ■ 

10O;           

334,  i  SO. 520 

1907 

42-   D 

Imports  and  exports  of  horses  and  mules,  villi  average  prices.  1892-1 


Imports  of  horses. 


Year  ended 

June  3iV-    ! 


Num- 
ber. 


1892 

...    14.074 

- 

...    15.451 

1894 

...      6, 166 

•   : 

...    13.09S 

189G 

...      9,991 

1897 

1898 

...     3,085 

1900 

...      3.102 

1901 

...      3,785 

1902 

...      4,832 

1903 

4.999 

1904 

...      4.726 

1905 

...      5,180 

1906 

...       6.021 

$2,455,868 
38,261 

1.319.572 
1.055.191 

662. 591 
464,808 

414.899 
551.050 

590. 592 
985. 73S 

1.577.234 
1 .  536..  296 
1 . 460. 287 
1 . 591 .  083 
1.716.675 


Value.     Average 
price. 


5174.  50 

154.57 

214.01 

80.56 

06.  32 

66.  42 

134.  49 

181.15 

192.  32 

260. 43 

326.  41 

307.  32 

308. 99 

307. 16 

285.11 


Exports  of  horses. 


Exports  of  mules. 


Num- 
ber. 


3.  226 

- 

5,  -2V, 
13.984 
25. 126 
39.532 
51.150 
45. 778 
64.722 
82.250 
103.020 
34. 007 
42.001 
34.822 
40. 0S7 


Value. 


Average     Xiim- 
price.         ber. 


$611,188 

7  IS.  607 
1,108,995 

2. 209. 29S 
3.530,703 
4. 769,  265 
6.176. 569 
5,  444. 342 
7.  612. -.16 
5,87 
10,048,046 
3.152.159 
3,189,100 
3.175.259 
4. 365. SSI 


S1S9.  46 
242.  20 
211.40 
157. 99 

140.52 
120.61 
120.  75 
118.93 
117.62 
107.89 
97.53 
92.  09 


75.93 


91.19 
108.91  ! 


1,965 
1,634 

2.0i.3 
2.515 

7.47:; 

8.098 

o.  7.55 
43. 309 
34.  40.5 
27    ■' 

4.294 

■    ■ 
7.167 


Value. 


52  -  ■ 
2 

240. 961 

186.452 

406. 101 

545. 331 

664.  789 

516. 90S 

3.919.47S 

3.210.267 

2.692.29S 

521,725 

412.971 

645.  464 

989.  6-39 


Average 
price. 


8121.42 

116.  SO 
74.14 
68.  63 
72.  97 
82.  09 
76.  52 
90. 3S 
93.31 
97. 60 
121.47 
112.90 
110.79 
138.08 


STATISTICS    OF    HORSES    AND    MULES. 


649 


Number,  average  price,  and  farm  value  of  horses  and  mules  in  the  United  States  January  1, 

1907,  by  States. 


State  or  Territory. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire. 

Vermont 

Massachusetts . . 

Rhode  Island 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia 

North  Carolina.. 
South  Carolina.. 

Georgia 

Florida 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Dakota. . . 
South  Dakota . . . 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas 


Horses. 


Indian  Territory . 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Arizona 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington 

Oregon 

California 


United  States 19, 746, 583 


115, 500 

GO, 600 

92,721 

80, 800 

13, 667 

60, 345 

G95, 877 

101, 8S6 

607,010 

36, 503 

158, 180 

307,920 

186, 850 

185, 846 

83,026 

139, 297 

51,278 

940,  440 

79S,  102 

1,575,000 

696, 518 

637,500 

723, 141 

1,390,950 

948,  420 

580, 880 

548. 760 
994,850 

1,085,750 
387,327 
315, 435 
158, 245 
257,295 
224,076 

1,277,641 
296, 400 
432, 361 

278. 761 
291,970 
119,054 
261,655 
119,258 

99, 249 
113, 827 

90,541 
149, 551 
296, 400 
282, 240 
391,680 


Average 

price  per 

head 

Jan.  1. 


Dollars. 

106.  00 

93.00 

101. 00 

113. 00 

119. 00 

118.  00 

111.00 

115.  00 

109.00 

103.  00 

90.00 

99.00 

95.00 

114.00 

126. 00 

121. 00 

100. 00 

113. 00 

110.  00 

109. 00 

111.00 

107. 00 

97.00 

100. 00 

93.00 

96.00 

84.00 

87.00 

89. 00 

97.00 

99. 00 

87. 00 

79.00 

69.00 

62.00 

63. 00 

78.00 

73.00 

63.00 

55.00 

66.  00 

42.00 

41.00 

55.00 

89.00 

71.00 

88.00 

81.00 

92.  00 


Farm  value 


93.51 


Dollars. 
12,254,550 
5,657, 
°,  380, 

,105, 

,624, 

,105, 

,541, 

,763, 

,127, 

,  70S, 

,  24S, 

,481, 

,704, 

,182, 

,437, 

,827, 

,138. 

,893, 

,735, 

,  990, 

,  369, 

,  340, 

,  260, 

,178, 

,937, 

,689, 

,909, 

,  362, 

,848, 

,  679, 

,338, 

,767, 

,418, 

,550, 

,456. 

,720, 

.  598. 

,304, 

,379, 

,  528, 

,210. 

,0o8, 

,02-*, 

,310, 

,  622, 

,  594, 

,  195, 

,827, 

,120, 


9, 

1, 

7 

77 

11 

66 

3 

14 
30 
17 
21 
10 
16 
5 
105 
87 
171 
77 
68 
70 
139 
87 
55 
45 
86 
96 
37 
31 
13 
20 
15 
79 
18 
33 
20 
18 
6 
17 
5 
4 
6 

8: 
io; 

26, 
22 
36! 


1,846,578,412 


Mules. 
Average 

!    Jan.  1. 


Dollars. 


4,208 

116.00 

487,140 

5,223 

127. 00 

661,862 

40, 864 

123.00 

5,024,210 

5,824 

120. 00 

699,909 

20, 120 

116.00 

2,331,945 

50, 733 

137. 00 

6,972,232 

10, 986 

101.00 

1,111,569 

174,714 

136. 00 

23, 740, 137 

134, 690 

153. 00 

20,598,121 

229, 691 

153.00 

35,039,340 

18,005 

152. 00 

2,732,275 

19,728 

114. 00 

2,250,150 

84,800 

118.  00 

10,017,424 

141,909 

117.00 

16,668,630 

3,076 

115.00 

422,579 

4,985 

106. 00 

527,358 

8, 657 

94.00 

816, 090 

43, 655 

108. 00 

4,702,541 

315,250 

104. 00 

32, 893, 203 

8,457 

103. 00 

869, 324 

7,970 

86.00 

685, 574 

69, 300 

102. 00 

7,063,749 

140, 390 

103. 00 

14,  468, 598 

198, 850 

109.  00 

21,628,928 

275,730 

112.00 

30,776,994 

231,750 

121.00 

28,139,0X5 

274, 437 

114.00 

31, 409, 335 

165, 791 

115.00 

19,055,981 

631,050 

93. 00 

58,763,376 

70,200 

93.  00 

6,549,660 

91,742 

101.00 

9,242,067 

206, 944 

93. 00 

19,270,625 

3,917 

80.00 

314,939 

1,526 

S2.00 

124, 717 

10,231 

92.00 

942, 176 

5,719 

69. 00 

393, 537 

4,001 

77.00 

309, 849 

3,560 

62. 00 

219, 057 

3,057 

88.00 

268, 758 

2,397 

89.00 

212, 155 

4,128 

101.00 

418, 500 

7,077 

90.00 

639, 379 

80,750 

106.  00 

8,599,875 

3,816,692  !       112.16 


Farm  value. 


Dollars. 


42S,063,613 


650 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Range  of  prices  for  horses  in  Omaha,  monthly.  1902-1906. 


Date. 

Drafts. 

pos 

Southern. 

rtera- 

Drivers. 

Carriage 
teams. 

Low. 

High,  i 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High .  | 

Low.  ■ 

Higl  . 

1902. 
January 

1 " 

i 

$55 

$85 

$35 

« 

$10 

$50 

"   " 

'  --' 

$200 

$350 

February 

5 

1S5 

60 

100 

35 

80 

10 

50 

" 

225 

200 

100 
100 
100 
90 
90 
90 

200 
225 
250 
200 
75 
175 

60 
60 
■ 
60 
40 
40 

100 
110 
105 
90 
SO 
80 

35 
30 
25 
20 
15 
15 

80 
65 
60 
45 
45 

10 
10 

.- 
12 
10 
10 

50 
50 

60 

60 

" 

80 

95 

100 

90 

225 
250 
325 
325 
200 
220 

200 
300 
300 
200 
210 

350 

500 

Mav 

500 

450 

July 

m 

August 

420 

Sep  ten:* 
October 

90 
100 

175 
175 

40 
40 

80 
80 

20 

■ 
45 

10 
10 

100 
100 

- 
90 

215 

215 
175 

360 
435 

Novem 

90 

160 

40 

80 

20 

65 

10 

SO 

90 

325 

230 

370 

December 

100 

:< 

' 

85 

- 

70 

12 

60 

90 

300 

200 

"• 

1903. 

JiT.uarv 

90 

175 

50 

80 

■ 

- 

10 

50 

' 

225 

200 

350 

Februar y 

95 

185 

60 

100 

35 

10 

50 

95. 

225 

200 

350 

100 
100 
110 
90 
90 
90 

200 
250 
250 
200 

175 
175 

60 
60 
65 
65 
50 
45 

110 
110 
105 
100 
SO 
80 

35 
30 
20 
15 

15 
15 

- 

40 

45 
45 

10 
10 
12 

.- 
10 

■50 

60 

i 
65 
90 

100 
100 
100 
100 

" 
75 

230 

250 

350 

75 

275 
220 

200 
200 

250 
300 
200 

40C 

500 

May 

550 

450 

July 

400 

Angmct 

420 

September 

90 

175 

40 

80 

15 

45 

10 

100 

- 

200 

215 

360 

October 

100 

180 

40 

80 

20 

45 

10 

100 

90 

215 

200 

435 

November 

90 

160 

IS 

i 

20 

60 

10 

80 

100 

325 

225 

370 

December 

100 

185 

" 

20 

60 

-- 

60 

100 

300 

200 

375 

1904. 

January 

120 

175 

65 

90 

45 

90 

10 

50 

150 

300 

4a 

Februar v 

120 

175 

70 

90 

40 

80 

10 

50 

150 

300 

4« 

120 
125 

175 
200 

75 

95 
100 

35 
30 

70 
65 

10 
10 

50 
50 

75 
90 

150 
75 

300 
300 

■ax 

Ma"h::::::::: 

m 

140 
135 
125 
120 
120 

-"- 
250 
200 
175 
175 

SO 
75 
65 
50 
60 

125 
110 
100 
90 
100 

30 
30 
30 
30 
30 

65 
60 
60 
60 
GO 

15 
15 
15 
15 

35 
40 
65 
90 
110 

125 
125 
120 
100 
100 

300 

300 

175 
175 
175 

300 
300 
300 
300 
300 

75< 

700 

July 

:  «; 

400 

September 

400 

October 

125 

200 

65 

100 

40 

75 

IS 

100 

125 

200 

300 

4S( 

November 

130 

235 

70 

100 

40 

90 

10 

35 

125 

200 

300 

45( 

December 

130 

225 

70 

100 

45 

12 

60 

125 

200 

300 

400 

1905. 

January 

150 

200 

75 

110 

40 

90 

10 

50 

75 

150 

300 

Ml 

February 

150 

200 

85 

125 

40 

90 

10 

50 

150 

300 

40t 

March 

150 

200 

90 

135 

35 

90 

10 

50 

1-50 

300 

4a 

April 

May 

150 

225 

.0 

120 

35 

80 

10 

50 

90 

175 

300 

4a 

150 

295 

60 

90 

30 

80 

15 

40 

"  90 

300 

300 

79 

June 

135 

.-.: 

60 

90 

30 

75 

15 

50 

90 

300 

300 

791 

July 

125 

200 

60 

100 

30 

70 

15 

.0 

100 

150 

300 

4a 



130 

60 

100 

30 

70 

15 

117 

100 

150 

300 

4a 

September 

130 

ax 

65 

100 

35 

75 

15 

110 

100 

150 

300 

in 

October 

140 

200 

70 

110 

45 

85 

15 

95 

IflO 

175- 

300 

«a 

November 

150 

250 

80 

125 

30 

100 

15 

70 

125 

200 

300 

& 

December 

150 

250 

80 

120 

x  50 

95 

10 

65 

125 

200 

300 

400 

I  06. 

January 

140 

225 

85 

135 

40 

90 

10 

50 

100 

175 

300 

4a 

February 

140 

225 

85 

135 

35 

90 

10 

50 

100 

175 

300 

45( 

140 
140 
140 
135 
125 
130 

250 
275 
335 
275 

225 
225 

■" 
BO 
75 
75 
75 
75 

135 
130 
110 
150 
150 
150 

35 
30 
30 
30 
40 
40 

80 
75 
85 
75 
90 
90 

10 
10 
15 
15 
15 
15 

50 
50 
50 
115 
120 
120 

100 
100 
100 
100 
100 
100 

175 
175 
350 
300 
150 
200 

300 
300 
300 
300 

300 
300 

iU 

500 

Mav 

750 

7-50 

July 

400 

August 

400 

September 

130 

225 

75 

150 

40 

90 

15 

122 

100 

..' 

300 

sa 

October 

140 

250 

75 

150 

40 

90 

15 

80 

100 

200 

300 

iu 

November 

150 

250 

-■ 

150 

35 

90 

15 

75 

125 

_■'.' 

300 

45( 

December 

1.50 

250 

i 

150 

35 

90 

10 

65 

125 

--.■: 

300          400 

STATISTICS    OF    CATTLE. 


651 


CATTLE. 
Number  and  value  of  milch  cows  and  other  cattle,  1S67-1007. 


January  1- 


1867.. 
1868.. 
1869. 
1870.. 
1871.. 
1872. 
1873. 
1874. 
1875. 
1876. 
1877. 
1878. 
1879. 
18S0. 
1881. 
18S2. 
18S3. 
1884. 
1885. 
1886. 
ISS7. 
18S8. 
1889. 


1891. 
1892. 
1893. 
1894. 
1895. 
1896. 
1897. 
1898. 
1899. 
1930. 
1901. 
1902. 
1903. 
1904. 
1905. 
1900. 
1907. 


Milch  cows. 


Number.   |  P^dper    Far 


S,  348,773 
8,691,568 
9,247,714 
10,095,600 
10,023,000 
10,303,500 
10,575,900 
10,705,300 
10,906,800 
11,035,400 
11,260,800 
11,300,100 
11,826,400 
12,027,000 
12, 368, 653 
12,611,632 
13,125,685 
13,501,206 
13,904,722 
14, 235,388 
14,522,083 
14,S56,414 
15, 293, 625 
15,952,883 
16,019,591 
16,416,351 
16,424,0S7 
16, 487, 400 
16, 504, 629 
16, 137, 586 
15,941,727 
15, 840, 886 
15,990,115 
16,292,360 
10, 833, 657 
10, 696, 802 
17,105,227 
17,419,817 
17,572,464 
19,793,806 
20,968,205 


?2S.74 
26.56 
29.15 
32.70 
33.  £9 
29.45 
26. 72 
25.63 
25.74 
25.61 
25.47 
25. 74 
21.71 
23.27 
23.95 
25. 89 
30.21 
31.37 
29.70 
27.40 
26.08 
24.05 
23.94 
22.14 
21. 62 
21.40 
21.75 
21.77 
21.97 
22.55 
23.16 
27.45 
29.06 
31.60 
30.00 
29.23 
30.21 
29.21 
27.44 
29.44 
31.00 


Other  cattle. 


8239, 946, 612 
230,816,717 
269,610,021 
330,175,234 
339, 700, 528 
303, 43S, 398 
282,559,051 
274, 325, 680 
280,700,645 
283,878,809 
283,778,030 
290,S97,809 
230,720,779 
279, 899, 420 
296,277,000 
326,489,310 
390,575,405 
423, 4S6,  (K9 
412,903,093 
3S9,985,5:3 
378,789,589 
366,252,1:3 
366,226,376 
353, 152, 133 
3-16,397,900 
351,378,132 
357,299,785 
353,998,601 
362,601,729 
363,955,545 
369, 239, 993 
434, 813,  826 
474, 233, 925 
514, 812, 106 
505,093,077 
488, 130, 324 
510,711,914 
508,841,489 
482,272,203 
582, 788, 592 
645, 490, 9S0 


Number.     r™f£el"    Farm  value. 


11,730,952 
11,942,4S4 
12, 1S5,3£5 
15,338,500 
16,212,200 
16,389,800 
16,413,800 
16,218,  ICO 
10,313,400 
16,785,X0 
17,956,100 
19,223,300 
21, 408,  ICO 
21, 231,  CC0 
20,933,710 
23, 280, 138 
28,046,077 
29,046,101 
29,  866, 573 
31,275,242 
33,511,750 
34,378,363 
35,032,417 
36,840,024 
36, 875,  C4S 
37,051,239 
35,954,196 
33, 608, 168 
34,304,216 
32,085,409 
30, 508, 408 
29, 264, 197 
27, 994, 225 
27,610,054 
45,500,213 
44, 727, 797 
44, 659, 206 
43, 629, 498 
43, 669, 443 
47,067,656 
51,565,731 


S15. 79 
15.06 
13.73 
18.87 
20.73 
18.12 
18.06 
17.  ,'5 
16.91 
17.00 
15.99 
16.72 
15.33 
16.10 
17.33 
19. 89 
21.81 
23.52 
23.25 
21.17 
19.79 
17.79 
17.05 
15.21 
14.76 
15.16 
15.24 
14.66 
14.06 
15.86 
16.65 
20. 92 
22.79 
24.97 
19.93 
18.76 
18.45 
16. 32 
15.15 
15.85 
17.10 


$185,253,850 

179,887,797 
228,183,001 
290, 400, 588 
336, 859, 61 7 
296,931,664 
296,448,030 
284,705,983 
275,871,664 
285,387,123 
287,155,528 
321,345,091 
329,253,031 
341,761,15! 
362,  S61, 509 
463,009,50! 
611,549,109 
083,229,05-i 
094,382,913 
061,950,274 
6f>3,137,920 
611,750,520 
597,236,812 
560, 625, 137 
544,127,903 
570, 749, 155 
547,882,204 
535,789,747 
482, 999, 129 
508,928,  41<; 
507,929,421 
612, 296, 634 
637,931,135 
689, 486, 260 
906,644,003 
839,126,073 
824,054,902 
712, 178, 134 
661,571,308 
746, 171, 709 
881,557,398 


Imports  and  exvorts  of  live  cattle,  xoith  average  prices,  1892-1906. 


Imports. 

Exports. 

"iear  ended  June  30 — 

Number. 

Value       I  Avera£e 
value.          price_ 

N  amber. 

Value. 

Average 
price. 

1892 

2,168 

3, 293 

1,592 

140,781 

217,826 

328, 977 

291,589 

199, 752 

181,000 

146, 022 

96,027 

06, 175 

16,050 

27,855 

29,019 

$47, 406 

45,682 

18, 704 

765, 853 

1, 509, 850 

2, 589, 857 

2,913,223 

2,320,362 

2,257,694 

1,931,433 

1,608,722 

1,161,548 

310,737 

458, 572 

548, 430 

$21.89 
13.87 
11.75 
5.11 
0.93 
7.87 
9.99 
11.02 
12.47 
13.23 
16.75 
17.55 
19.35 
16.46 
18.90 

394, 007 
287,094 
359, 278 
331,722 
372, 401 
392, 190 
439, 255 
389,  490 
397, 286 
459, 218 
392, 884 
402, 178 
593,  409 
567, 800 
584,239 

$35,099,095 
26,032,428 
33,461,922 
30, 603, 796 
34, 560, 672 
36,357,451 
37,827,500 
30,516,833 
30, 635, 153 
37, 566, 980 
29, 902, 212 
29, 848, 936 
42,256,291 
40, 598, 048 
42,081,170 

$88.95 

1893 

90.  OS 

1894 

93.14 

1895 

92.26 

1896 

92.79 

1897 

92.70 

1893 

86.12 

1S99 

78.35 

1900 

77.11 

1901 

81.81 

1902 

76.11 

1903 

74.22 

1904 

71.21 

1905 

71.50 

1900 

72  03 

652 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Number,  average  price,  and  farm-  value  of  cattle  in  the  United  States  on  January  1,  1907. 


STAT"   or.   TERRITORY. 




New  Ham] 

Vermont 

Massachusetts 

Rhode  Island 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia 

North  Carolina... 
South  Carolina.. . 

Georgia 

Florida 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Illinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa 

Missouri 

North  Daki      .... 

South  Dakota 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas 

Indian  Territory. 

Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Arizona 

Utah 

Nevada 

Idaho 

AVashington 

Oregon 

Caluoraia 


Milch  cows. 

Other  cattle. 

Average 

Average 

Number. 

price  per 

Farm  value. 

Number. 

price  per 

Farm  value. 

Jan.  1. 

Jan.  1. 

185,286 

$31.  CO 

55,743,866 

156,005 

$16.00 

$2,511,677 

132, 498 

33.09 

4,372,431 

106, 35C 

17.  CO 

1,772,860 

293,931 

2S.C0 

8,230,068 

225, 870 

15.  CO 

3,370,751 

200.273 

42.00 

S,  411,  466 

93,371 

18.00 

1,076.937 

25,  721 

42.00 

1,080,282 

10, 443 

20.00 

210, 433 

137, 485 

37.00 

5,086,915 

84,028 

20.00 

1,695,680 

1,826,211 

36.00 

65, 743,  590 

944,734 

18.00 

17,307,520 

190, 193 

41.00 

8,363,492 

82,003 

20.00 

1,658,107 

1,  111,  494 

36.00 

41,093,784 

984,750 

18.  CO 

17,479,308 

36, 905 

35.00 

1,291/675 

22,  455 

19.00 

436.075 

153,364 

31.00 

4, 754, 28 1 

140,  732 

13.00 

2, 570, SOS 

290,700 

28.00 

8, 139. 600 

566, 5C0 

IS.  00 

10,253,650 

244. SCO 

31.00 

7.588,800 

559, 980 

21.00 

11,703,574 

282,600 

24.00 

6, 7S2,  400 

445,954 

12.00 

5, 199, 820 

136,911 

28.00 

3,833,503 

218,502 

12.00 

2,619,840 

305, 469 

30.00 

9,164,0.0 

679,911 

11.00 

7,451,822 

89,638 

30.00 

2. 6S9, 140 

656,600 

11.00 

7,C45,318 

919, 100 

34.00 

31,249,400 

1,105,380 

22.00 

23,737,7S0 

052, 610 

33.00 

21,536,103 

1,141,778 

21.00 

24,080,090 

1,161,500 

35.  GO 

40,652,500 

2,231,000 

22.00 

49,238,170 

832,000 

34.00 

28,2S8,0C0 

1,045,000 

17.00 

17,320,100 

1,365,000 

31.00 

42,315,000 

1, 148, 124 

15.00 

16. 7S5. 580 

1,019,700 

29.00 

29,571,300 

1,305,000 

13.00 

17,400,900 

1,  .555, 300 

32.00 

49, 769, COO 

3,9C0,;JOO 

23.00 

90,288,000 

075, 100 

27.00 

26, 32 

2,397,000 

19.00 

45,950,490 

220, 178 

27.00 

5,944,806 

682,880 

13.00 

12,300,128 

605,  768 

28-{  ) 

10,961,504 

1,485,000 

19.00 

28,823,850 

870, 135 

29.00 

25, 233, 915 

3,360,000 

19.  CO 

65,307,720 

729,274 

2S.00 

20, 419, 672 

3, 704, 700 

20.00 

73,844,591 

402,000 

28.00 

11,250,000 

736,250 

18.00 

12,972,710 

328, 250 

23.00 

7, 549,  750 

601, 0C0 

12.00 

7,212,000 

282,800 

21.00 

5,938,800 

561,000 

9.00 

4,908,750 

329, 669 

21.00 

6,923,049 

600,950 

9.00 

5,408,644 

188, 141 

24.00 

4,515,384 

479, 750 

10.00 

4,905,414 

993,122 

24.75 

24,579,770 

8,236,549 

12.00 

100,S56,544 

111,547 

24.00 

2, 077, 128 

503,000 

13.00 

6,782,955 

198. 102 

24.00 

4,754.  44s 

1,387,151 

16.00 

22.807,179 

400,000 

17.50 

7,000,000 

739,000 

7.00 

5,512,940 

65,948 

35.00 

2,308,180 

916, 350 

20.00 

18,134,570 

21,813 

40.00 

872,520 

S55.000 

22.00 

19,023,750 

136,712 

30.00 

4,921,032 

1,425,000 

20.00 

28, 172, 250 

21,820 

37.00 

807,340 

948,240 

17.00 

15,7SS,  194 

21,791 

40.00 

871,640 

597, 07S 

17.00 

10, 405, 872 

75, 919 

30.00 

2,277,570 

300,000 

18.00 

5,661,000 

16,988 

36.00 

611,568 

386,120 

18.00 

0, 92.;,  451 

66, 345 

32.00 

2, 123, 010 

351,086 

17.00 

5,850, 118 

173, 724 

34.00 

5,906,616 

409,050 

17.00 

0,850,508 

148, S14 

32.00 

4,762,048 

750,000 

15.00 

11,428,125 

405, 610 

35.00 

14,196,500 

1,167,107 

IS.  00 

21, 474, 767 

20, 90S,  2(35 

31.00 

045, 493, 9S0 

"».731 

17.10 

881, 557.39S 

STATISTICS    OF    CATTLE. 
Wholesale  prices  of  cattle  per  100  pounds,  1002-1906. 


653 


Chicago. 


Cincinnati. 


Date. 


Inferior  to     '     Fair  to  me- 
primc.  diuni. 


January. . . 
February . . 
March. .". .. 

April 

May 

Juno 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. 


January. . . 
February.. 
March .'.... 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 

October 

November. 
December. . 


January. . 
February . . 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. 


January.  .-. 
February. . 
March. . . .. 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. 


January. . . 
February. . 
March. .". .. 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. 


1904. 


1005. 


Low. 

High. 

Low. 

$2.  20 

S7.75 

S3.  75 

2.25 

7.35 

3.65 

2.35 

7.35 

3.75 

2.  35 

7.50 

4.25 

2.50 

7.70 

4.10 

2.  35 

8.50 

3.25 

2.25 

8.85 

3.15 

2.40 

9.00 

3.25 

2.25 

8.85 

3.00 

1.S0 

8.75 

2.90 

2.00 

7.40 

3.00 

2.00 

14.50 

3.00 

2.00 

0.85 

3.15 

2.35 

6.15 

3.10 

2.50 

5.75 

3.35 

2.50 

5.80 

3.75 

2.50 

5.65 

3.25 

2.25 

5.65 

3.00 

2.25 

5.65 

2.85 

2.15 

6.10 

2.50 

2.00 

6.15 

2.25 

1.G5 

6.00 

2.50 

1.50 

5.85 

2.35 

1.50 

8.35 

2.35 

2.10 

5.  90 

3. 00 

2.25 

6.00 

3.00 

2.15 

6.00 

3.00 

2.25 

5.80 

3.15 

2.35 

5.85 

3.10 

2.35 

6.70 

3.00 

2.20 

6.65 

3.00 

2.20 

6.40 

2.65 

2.15 

6.40 

2.50 

1.70 

7.00 

2.50 

1.70 

7.15 

2.50 

1.80 

7. 65 

2.25 

1.85 

6.30 

2.65 

1.90 

6.45 

2.65 

2. 20 

6.25 

2.50 

2.40 

7.00 

3.50 

2.  35 

6.85 

3.15 

2.30 

6. 35 

3.00 

2.00 

6.25 

3.00 

2.10 

6.30 

2.85 

2.00 

6.50 

2.75 

2.10 

6.40 

2.50 

2.15 

6.60 

2.35 

2.15 

7.00 

2.65 

2.00 

6.50 

2.85 

2.10 

6.40 

3.25 

2.25 

6.35 

3.25 

2.35 

6.35 

3.00 

2.50 

6.20 

3.00 

1.75 

6.10 

2.75 

2.00 

6.50 

2.60 

2.00 

6.85 

2.50 

2.05 

6.95 

2.50 

2.00 

6.95 

2.40 

1.75 

7.40 

2.35 

1.75 

7.90 

2.75 

High. 


$4.  65 
4.75 
5.25 
5.40 
5.35 
5.25 
5.25 
5.25 
4.40 
4.25 
4.15 
4.25 


4.35 
4.25 
4.40 
4.40 
4.40 
4.40 
4.10 
4.00 
3.75 
3.65 
3.40 
3.75 


4.00 
3.75 
4.00 
4.00 
4.25 
4.25 
4.25 
4.00 
3.75 
3. 75 
3.50 
3.60 


3.85 
4.00 
4.40 
4.75 
4.65 
4.25 
4.40 
4.10 
4.00 
3.85 
3.75 
4.00 


4.00 
4.35 
4.50 
4.40 
4.35 
4.00 
4.40 
4.25 
4.40 
4.35 
4.50 
4.50 


St.  Louis. 


Omaha. 


Good  to  choice 

native  steers. 


Low.   i  High. 


$6. 10 
6.35 
6.40 
6.  95  i 
6.90 
7.50 
7.50 
7.40 
6.60 
6.  35 
5. 15 
5.  25 


5.10 
5.10 
5.10 
5.10 
5.00 
5.10 
5.15 
5.25 
5.60 
5.40 
5.15 
5.10 


5.15 
4.90 
5.00 
5.25 
5.05 
5.75 
5.90 
5.60 
5.75 
6.05 
5.15 
5.  75 


5.15 
5.15 
5.50 
5.90 
5.85 
5.25 
5.25 
5.50 
5.50 
6.00 
5.40 
5.50 


5.45 
5.65 
5.75 
5.50 
5.45 
5.50 
5.85 
5.85 
6.25 
6.15 
5.85 
6.00 


S7.00 
6.50 
6.75 
7.10 
7.50 
8.00 
8.35 
8.75 
S.00 
7.10 
7.25 
6.00 


5.75 
5.25 
5.40 
5.60 
5.50 
5.25 
5.35 
5.55 
5.70 
5.  55 
5.40 
6.00 


5.  35 
5.35 
5.35 
5.40 
5.35 
6.40 
6.25 
6.00 
0.00 
6.60 
6.60 
6.00 


5.50 
6.00 
5.65 
6.  75 
6.50 
6.50 
5.85 
5.70 
6.35 
6.15 
6.15 
7.10 


6.00 
0.00 
6.00 
5.75 
5.80 
6.00 
6.10 
6.30 
0.40 
6.75 
7.00 
7.00 


Native  beeves. 


Low. 


$3.40 
3.50 
4.00 
4.50 
4.35 
4.25 
5.00 
5.00 
4.15 
4.50 
3.20 
3.00 


3.  35 
3.15 
3.45 
3.20 
3.85 
3.75 
3.65 
3.85 
3.60 
3.90 
3.00 
2.05 


3.20 
3.00 
2.75 
3.00 
3.00 
3.50 
3.40 
3.25 
4.00 
4.25 
3.10 
3.10 


3.05 
3.15 
3.20 
3.25 
3.75 
3.70 
3.50 
3.25 
3.40 
3.10 
3.50 
3.05 


3.10 
3.00 
3.10 
3.35 
3.50 
3.35 
3.10 
3.05 
2.90 
3.75 
3.25 
3.00 


654 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


BUTTER. 
Wholesale  prices  of  butter  per  pound  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


New  York. 

Cincinnati. 

Chicago.                 Elgin. 

Date. 

Creamery 
extra. 

Creamery. 

Creamery             Creamery 
firsts.                    extra. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low.   J 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

1902. 

Cents. 
23 
26 
27 
22 
22J 
214 
20l 
19 
194 
224 
25" 
28 

284. 

26" 

27 

224 

22 

204. 

19 

19 

19J 

20 

224. 

23" 

22 

23 

24 

22 

18 

17f 

174 

174 

19" 

20 

23 

26 

28 
29} 

25 

27 

201 

194 

204 

20} 

201 

20 

174 

24' 

25 

26 

27 

21 

19} 

19i 

204. 

21 

24 

25} 

27" 

304 

Cents. 

26 

30 

30 

33 

25 

224 

21* 

204 

23" 

25 

28} 

30" 

28} 

28 

294 

294 

23" 

22} 

204 

191 

211 

221 

25} 

25} 

24} 

264 

26} 

24} 

24} 

181 

18 

19i 

21 

23', 

26} 

28" 

304 

35} 

31} 

32" 

27 

214 

21 J 

22 

211 

22 

24} 

26 

274 

27} 

274 

2.V 

22 

21 

21} 

24; 

2.V 
27 
304 
33" 

Cents. 
22 
22 
23 
23 
19 
19 
IS 
17 
17 
204 
21} 
25" 

22 

22 

244 

194 

174 

18" 

15} 

16} 

18" 
194 
214 

194 
214 
22 

20} 

174 

174 

17" 

17 

19 

20 

23 

26} 

28 

30 

24 

26 

204 

19" 

19} 

20 

20 

204 

22 

234 

25} 

26} 

27 

23 

19 

t$ 

20' 

214 

24" 

241 

20 

30 

Cents. 

23 
26 
24 

27 

20 

20 

21 

19 

21} 

22} 

25 

27 

25 

26 

26 

20} 

21 

20 

18} 

20 

20 

22} 

23} 

22} 

24 

24 

23 

21} 

19 

19 

19 

204 

22' 

25} 

28 

30} 

34 

30 

32 

25 

21 

204 

214 

214 

23" 

214 

25' 

27 

294 

28" 

27 

22 

21 

229 

24" 

254 

27" 

31 

324 

Cents. 

20 

20 
22 
18 
19 

18} 

184 
16" 
17 
19 
214 
23 

20 
20 
24 
21 
17 
18 
17 
16 
17 
17 
18 
19 

17 

18 

19 

19 

15 

15 

15 

15 

16} 

17 

19 

20 

22 
25 

22 
22 
18 
18 
18 
184 
18" 
19 
20 
19 

20 

22 

21 

17 

164 

16} 

18 

18 

204 

22" 

22 

25 

Cents. 

24 
29 

28 
31 
23 

22 

214 

20" 

22} 

24} 

27 

28} 

28 

27} 

284 

28} 

22" 

22 

20 

19 

21} 

21} 

24} 

25 

234 

26" 

26 

24} 

23 

18 

18 

18} 

194 

22 

24} 

Cents. 
24 
254 
26" 
22 
22 
21 
20 
19 
19 
224 
24} 
28 

25 

25 

274 

224 

20" 

20 

18} 

18} 

19} 

204 

22" 

24 

22 
23 
24} 
23 
17} 
17} 
17 
17 
19 
20 
23 

Cents. 
24} 

29 

28 

30 

22 

22 

July               

21 

20 

224 

244 

27 

29 

1903. 

29 

27 

28} 

April               

28* 

22} 

22 

July                 

20 

19} 

21} 

21} 

24 

25 

1904. 

24 

26 

26 

24} 

23 

17} 

July              

17} 

19 

20 

23 

25 

28  j           25 

30  |          28 

34  1          29 

28 

1905. 

294 

34 

32 

31 

24 

204 

20} 

21" 

21 

22 

23 

24} 

27 

27> 

274 

26} 

20" 

21 

20 

23 

24 

25} 

28} 

31 

25 

27 

21 

194 

20 

20 

20} 

21" 

22} 

24 

26 
27 
27 
21 
19 
19' 
20" 
214 
24" 
24} 
26" 
30 

33 

31} 

25 

20} 

July 

20 

21 

21 

22} 

24 

25 

1900. 

27 

284 

28} 

20 

21 

20 

July..    .            

21} 

23 

24} 

26 

30 

31} 

STxVTISTICS    OF   DAIRY   PRODUCTS. 


655 


CHEESE. 

Wholesale  prices  of  cheese  per  pound  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


Date. 


1902. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1903. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1904. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1905. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1906. 

January 

February 

Mareh.." 

April 

May 

Juno 

July 

August 

September 

Oetobei 

November 

December 


New  York. 


September, 
colored. 


Low. 


Cents. 

n\ 
m 

12} 
13 
10J 
9~h 
9j 
94 
10f 
12 
12'. 

13 


High. 


11 

14 

it 

141 
9', 
9', 

11 

111 

124 

13| 

133 

14 


Cents. 
11| 
12V 
13* 

13J 
13 
9| 
10} 

tog 

12 
12'. 
13 
13', 


Cincinnati. 


Factory. 


Low.      High 


Cents. 
10 
10'. 
11 
11 
11 J 
10l 
10T 
m 

10J. 

n 

12 

12 


12 

i;v, 

137 

is7 

11" 

11 

n 

12 
13 
13 
13j 
13J 


Chicago. 


Young 
Americas. 


Low. 


Cents. 
11 
11 

n| 

m 

12 
12 

ioi 

10 

m 

12 
12i 
13^ 


134 


nigh. 


Cents. 
10* 
10* 
HJ 
13 
12  * 
10J 

m 

10i 

]oi| 

nil 

•  in 

ill 


13 

m 

i-'i 

12i 
10\ 

101 

to 

9 

9i 

to 

10 

10 


Cents. 
«S 

12'. 

12.', 

13 

131 

12J 

10J 

11 

11} 

Hi 

12 

13} 


St.  Louis. 


Full  cream. 


Low.      High 


Cents. 
105 
12'. 
13" 
13? 

12; 
11 
111. 

1H 
11} 
ll! 
12| 
13! 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPAETMEXT    OF    AGBICULTUEE. 
SHEEP  AND  WOOL. 
Xumber  and  farm  ralue  of  s/h 


-_•■- : . 


~-:~7 


.  u    r  -  .  - 


:>    . 


Farm  Talae. 


... 

-    •-:     .. 
"   ?24  27 


is:: 

-.. 

1S73. 

I 

re. 


33,002  ■<: 

-.:.  :-'.«.:••:•: 

:.:."■    -.:.: 

;o. ; :.?    .•:• 

•  <-;  _■:»: 

»  35;  740, 300 

ISTv 38,123,800 

is.-: 

i:.T'   r      Si 

iss: -    "    - 

ISM "         .         . 

"  '■• 

lSV 

"39.314 


5_  '." 
.  ■- 
hi.A 
L95 
2.14 
261 

2  43 

- 

213 

221 
207 

i 

- 
.   5 

-  S 

-  M 
L&l 


.   .    .^.    ... 
71,032 

-:.:■:•:  ::: 


99C 

110 

606 

:■--: 


'     57a 

:.>.;; 
»:  :  " 

•    -_- 

■_      : 

-   ::«  :  • 

S5.1M.646 
76,361.  CSS 

:• 
va  :::  s-:: 

106,595.954 

:i4  :.■:.-  s :: 
::;  ?:■:  - 

:;-  ...     -,- 


N  unl  -:  r. 


Price 


--     • : .    ' 


:>s? 

:-■  

ISA 

lflH 

1892 

uos 

1894 

:>:-: 

■ 

1887 

1898 

1900 

1901 

iac 

190S 

1904 

1905 

1901 

1901 


... 

<_  ■-  ■■  ::.- 

44,336,1172 

-: ".-:  :  ::•: 

44,93s,  363 

-    -•    ■-.: 

■ 
4:  ••     ■  - 


■    .     _  . 


5:    : 
2.13 

250 

-  :•• 
266 

:  :. 

L5S 
1.70 

.    ■- 
2.45 

293 

.     - 

-  ' 
259 

.   S3 


,_     ...    ... 

;      i 

:     ; 

116.1. 

125. 509,264 

*.-  .:■•  ::■:> 

: 
-    2 
.  n 

-  -     ' 

■■    ~  - 
:-.- 

127 
17 


Number,  crtragt  price,  end  far^i  re'  s  on  January  1,1 


State  or  Territorv.    Xamber. 


r- 

- 
-'.■ 

Z. '  i  - 
"     -     ■ 


Rhode  Island 

?•" 



Delaware 

V-  .r  .   -  : 

V.-rizv 

Virginia 

if    ::h  C-r:.  z 

Georgia 

F.:-/i. 

Ohk 

:  ■  -. : .  ■  r    


1... 
v 


Dakota 


-    : 

•"•   '• 
:  :.     ■ 
44,198 

::.■:■- 

:  i  ■- 
'  .  . 

--    •■ 
.:    ■  ■ 

.".  ■  -: 
::     •  - 

101.255 
3.140,720 

:<    -.- 

777     .- 

2.10S.  795 

436.593 
703.502 

■    ' 
674, 4B& 


-    IS 

- 


2  44 

_ 

-     ■ 
223 

■ 
5- S3 


545 
550. 


-"    "       :  - 


:; 

£59 

: 
i 

: 
. 

731 

71 

.574 


"- 

1 

:."- : 


-:::   I   .v--; ;     ..-" 

Xr:7^.. " 

Ki-s.ii . 

....   ::••:.  :>:•: 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 183,280 

:  :•:-. '.-— 

1.665,963 

Indian  Territorv  -I        30. 977 

•:  ^_i:-- >.:•'. 

.•:i.-:..; y.-z  --:': 

V    :_-__:. "          ":: 

WTOming. 4,986,796 

Colorado 

XewMeiieo. -: 

Arizona 859,397 

Utah - 

Nevada ;|  1,599,977 

: :  :.- ;- .-^  ::v 

V-_;-^.-;: -.-    :.' 

Oregon. .       ■ 

.  .    -.      . .  .... 

- 


■     .       -  - 


-      .       .       .. 


STATISTICS    OF    SHEEP    AND    WOOL. 


657 


Imports  and  exports  of  sheep,  with  average  prices,  1892-1906. 


Imports. 

Exports. 

Year  ended  June  30— 

Number. 

Value. 

Average 
price. 

Number. 

Value. 

Average 
price. 

1892 

380, 814 
459, 484 
242,568 
291,  461 
322,  (192 
405,  633 
392,  314 
345,  911 
381,  792 
331,  488 
266,  953 
301,  623 
238, 094 
186. 942 
240, 747 

81, 440, 530 

1,682,977 

788, 181 

682, 618 

853,530 

1,019,668 

1, 100.  ^ 

1,200,081 

1,365,026 

1, 236, 277 

956, 711 

1,036,934 

815, 289 

704, 721 

1, 020, 859 

83.78 
3.06 
3.25 
2.34 
2.65 
2.51 
2.82 
3.47 
3  58 
3.73 
3.58 
3.44 
3.42 
3.77 
4.24 

46, 960 
37, 260 
132, 370 
405,  748 
491,  565 
244, 120 
199, 690 
143, 280 
125, 772 
297, 925 
358,  720 
176, 961 
301,313 
268, 365 
142,690 

$161, 105 

126, 394 

832, 763 

2, 630, 686 

3,076,384 

1,531,645 

1, 213, 886 

853, 555 

733, 477 

1,933,000 

1,940,060 

1,067,860 

1,954,604 

1,687,321 

804, 090 

$3  43 

1893 

3  39 

1894 

6  29 

1895 

6  43 

1896 

1897 

6  27 

1898 

6.08 

1899 

5  96 

1900 

5  83 

1901 

6.49 

1902 

5.41 

1903 

6  03 

1904 

6.49 

1905 

6.29 

1906 

5.64 

Prices  of  sheep  per  100  pounds  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


Date. 


Chicago. 

Cincinnati. 

St.  Louis. 

Omaha. 

Inferior  to 
choice. 

Goo  .t 

3  extra. 

Good  to 
choice  natives. 

Native. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High.  . 

$2.00 

$4.75 

$3.00 

$4.25 

$4.25 

$5.00 

$4.00 

$5.15 

2.00 

5.50 

3.50 

5.50 

4.75 

5.60 

4.20 

5.85 

3.00 

5.75 

4.25 

5.50 

5.50 

5.75 

4.40 

5.90 

2.50 

6.50 

3.75 

5.50 

5.50 

6.25 

4.75 

6.25 

2.25 

6.50 

4.35 

5.75 

6.00 

6.35 

5.40 

6.00 

1.50 

6.25 

3.50 

4.60 

3.70 

5.60 

4.50 

6.00 

1.75 

5.00 

3.10 

4.00 

4.00 

4.60 

3.80 

4.50 

1.59 

4.25 
4.50 

2.25 
2.00 

4.00 
3.40 

3.85 
3.65 

4.35 
4.00 

1.50 

2.00 

3.40 

1.50 

4.25 

2.65 

3.40 

3.90 

4.00 

3.00 

4.10 

1.50 

4.25 

2.50 

3.35 

3.75 

4.00 

3.40 

4.25 

1.25 

4.75 

2.75 

4.00 

3.80 

4.50 

3.50 

4.75 

1.50 

5.25 

3.25 

4.50 

4.50 

5.00 

3.60 

5.40 

2.00 

5.75 

3.75 

5.00 

5.25 

5.25 

4.50 

5.  SO 

2.00 

7.00 

4.25 

6.00 

5.50 

6.15 

4.60 

6.75 

2.25 

7.00 

4.10 

6.25 

6.00 

6.25 

4.50 

6.75 

-1.60 

6.25 

3.60 

4.75 

4.50 

5.25 

4.00 

5.50 

2.00 

6.00 

3.00 

4.50 

4.50 

4.75 

3.80 

5.50 

1.50 

5.25 

2.90 

4.00 

3.75 

4.75 

3.00 

4.50 

1.50 

4.25 

2.75 

3.35 

3.50 

3.85 

3.00 

4.00 

1.50 

4.25 

2.60 

3.40 

3.65 

4.00 

3.50 

3.50 

1.50 

4.25 

2.75 

3.50 

3.65 

4.00 

3.55 

3.55 

1.25 

4.35 

2.60 

3.35 

3.60 

3.  65 

3.25 

4.00 

1.50 

4.25 

2.60 

3.75 

3.65 

3.85 

3.25 

4.40 

2.00 

4.75 

3.25 

4.00 

3.75 

4.75 

2.25 

5.10 

2.00 

4.75 

3.40 

4.60 

4.75 

4.75 

2.60 

5.25 

2.00 

5.50 

3.65 

4.50 

4.75 

4.90 

2.53 

5.25 

2.50 

6.00 

4.00 

4.50 

5.40 

5.60 

3.25 

5.65 

2.00 

6.00 

3.75 

4.55 

5.50 

5.65 

4.00 

5.90 

1.75 

5.50 

3.00 

4.40 

4.60 

5.50 

4.00 

5.25 

1.50 

5.50 

2.75 

4.00 

4.00 

4.25 

3.75 

5.00 

2.00 

4.25 

2.75 

4.00 

3.75 

4.00 

3.40 

4.35 

1.75 

4.50 
4.75 
5.00 

2.75 
2.75 
2.75 

3.50 
3.50 
4.00 

3.75 
4.10 
4.25 

4.00 
4.50 
4.75 

1.50 

1.75 

3.75 

4.50 

2.50 

5.65 

3.50 

4.50 

4.75 

4.90 

4.00 

5.50 

4.50 

5.85 

4.10 

5.25 

5.15 

6. 35 

3.25 

6.25 

4.50 

6.25 

4.50 

5.50 

5.50 

6.15 

3.00 

6.90 

4.75 

6.25 

4.75 

5.50 

5.85 

6.25 

3.00 

6.75 

4.50 

6.30 

4.50 

5.25 

5.25 

5.90 

2.75 

6.75 

4.00 

5.50 

3.85 

5.00 

5.00 

5.40 

2.50 

6.00 

4.00 

5.25 

3.60 

4.35 

4.80 

5. 00 

2.50 

5.70 

4.00 

5.90 

3.60 

4.75 

5.00 

5.50 

4.75 

6.00 

4.00 

5.65 

3.75 

4.50 

4.60 

5.20 

4.00 

5.30 

3.80 

5.40 

4.00 

4.75 

5.00 

5.00 

3.75 

5.25 

4.00 

5.70 

4.00 

5.25 

5.25 

5.60 

4.00 

6.00 

4.25 

6.10 

4.10 

5.00 

5.25 

5.75 

4.25 

6.00 

4.25 

6.25 

4.10 

5.15 

5.50 

6.00 

4.50 

6.25 

1902. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1903. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1904. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August ; , 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1905. 

Janua  ry 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

3       A1906 42 


658  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Prices  of  sheep  per  100  pounds  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States.  1902-1906 — Cont'd. 


Chicago. 

Cincinnati. 

St.  Louis. 

Omaha. 

Date. 

Inferior  to 
choice. 

Good  to  extra. 

Good  to 
choice  natives. 

Native. 

Low.      High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

1906. 

January 

$3. 70 

-     -' 

S4.50 

$5.50 

So.  75 

-     - 

54.00 

$4.60 

February 

3.50 

0.25 

4.  35 

5.50 

5.50 

_ 

3.50 

- 

3.50 
3.50 

6.50 
6.  50 

5.00 
4.00 

5.75 
5.75 

5.50 
5.50 

6.  45 
6.00 

2.  75 
3.25 

6.00 

April 

Mav 

6.15 

3.75 

6.50 

4.10 

4.75 

6.00 

_ 

4.  50 

6.40 

June 

3.50 

25 

4.40 

5. 25 

6.00 

0.10 

3.80 

6.50 

Julv 

3.00 

6.25 

4.10 

4.75 

5.25 

5.  75 

4.00 

6.25 

Aug  ast 

3.00 

5.60 

4.10 

4.75 

5.00 

5.50 

4.:" 

5.85 

September 

3.50 

5.75 

4.10 

4.75 

5.35 

i  n 

5.85 

October 

3.50 

o.  15 

3.85 

4.75 

5. 35 

5.50 

4.75 

5. 65 

November 

3.25 

O.  10 

4.00 

4.C0 

5.50 

5.60 

4.  90 

6.10 

December 

3.00 

7.00 

4.00 

4.75 

5.50 

6.00 

4.75 

6.35 

Wool  product  of  the  United  States  for  1906.  by  States. 
[Estimate  of  National  Association  of  Wool  Manufacturers.] 


State  or  Tenit  nry. 


Number  of    AJ£j**ffe    Percent         Wool, 

~V  «  ™^    of  shrink-  -washed  and 
100?      aSe>1£06-     unwashed. 


sheep  Apr 

1,  KOO, 


Wool, 
scoured. 


Maine 

New  Hampshire . 

Vermont 

Massachusetts. . 
Rhode  Island . . . 

Connecticut 

New  York 

New  Jersey 

Pennsylvania. . . 

Delaware 

Maryland 

Virginia 

West  Virginia. .. 
North  Carolina . . 
South  Carolina. . 

Georgia 

Florida 

Ohio 

Indiana 

Hlinois 

Michigan 

Wisconsin 

Minnesota 

Iowa . 


Missouri 

North  Dakota 

South  Dakota . . . 

Nebraska 

Kansas 

Kentucky 

Tennessee 

Alabama 

Mississippi 

Louisiana 

Texas 

Indian  Territory- 
Oklahoma 

Arkansas 

Montana 

Wyoming 

Colorado 

New  Mexico 

Arizona 

Utah. 


Nevada 

Idaho 

Washington. 

Oregon 

California... 


200,000 

63,000 
HO, 000 

26,000 
6,500 

26,000 
725.000 

32,000 
850,000 
6,500 
100,000 
350,000 
480,000 
205,000 

50,000 
250,000 
105.534 
1,S50,000 
800,000 
550.000 
1,500,000 
SOO.OOO 
350,000 
500,000 
714,264 
375,000 
575,000 
250.000 
170,000 
575,000 
275,1300 
175.000 
165,000 
155.000 
1,440,000 

60,000 

200,000 
4,940,000 
4,531,000 
1,400,000 
2,900,000 

680,000 
1,900,000 

650,000 
2,300,000 

575,000 
1,800,000 
1,750,000 


rounds. 
6 

6.2 
6 

5.S 
5.5 
5.5 
6 

5.  5 
6 
6 


5.5 

4.25 

4 

3.8 

3 

6.25 

6.  25 

6.5 

6.3 

6.  75 
7 

6.5 
6.45 
6.5 
6.5 
7.5 

7.  5 
4.  75 
4.  25 
3.25 
4 

3.7 
6.5 


4.5 

7.  25 

5.5 

6.  5 
6.5 
8 

7.  35 
8.5 
8.5 
7.5 


Per  cent 
40 
50 
51 
42 
42 
42 
50 
50 
50 
50 
45 
38 
48 
42 
42 
40 
40 
50 
45 
48 
50 
48 
52 
50 
48 
61 
60 
67 
'.7 

40 
40 

42 
42 
66 

67 

41 
65 
68 
67 
62 
66 
65 
69 
67 
70 
70 
67 


6.  66 


100,010,942 
29,400,000 

Total  product,  1900 1 '     298,915,130  |  129,410,942 


United  States '  38,540,7? 

Fulled  wool , 


61.08 
30 


Pounds. 

1,200,000 

390,600 

960,000 

150,800 

35,750 

143,000 

4,350,000 

176,000 

5,100,000 

39,000 

560,000 

1,750,000 

2 

J01.25::i 

200,000 

950,000 

316,602 

1      ;   _    : 

5.000.000 

3,. "75, POO 

9,450,000 

5,400,000 

2,450,000 

•       J 

2.437.5IM 
3,737,500 

1,275,800 

1,116,875 

680,000 
573,500 

9,360,000 

360,000 

900,000 
35,815,000 
32,849,750 

9,450,000 
15,950,000 

4,420,000 
12,350,000 

5,200,000 
10,905,000 

4,887,500 
15,300,000 
13,125.000 


Pounds. 
720,000 
195.300 

87,464 

20,735 

52 
2,175,000 

88,000 
2,550,000 

19,500 

275.000 

1,085,000 

n 

.505.325 
116,000 
570,000 
189,961 
5,781,250 
2,750,000 

.- 

1,170,000 

-■ 
2,395,6/52 
950,625 
1,495,000 
■   "" 

1,693,375 

070. 125 
341.250 
382,800 

■- 
118,800 

531,000 

52,535.250 
10. 51!. 920 
3.11-. 500 
6,061,000 
1,502,800 
4,322.500 

1,612,000 

.    .. 

1,466,250 

4,5PO,000 

4.331.250 


256,915,130 

42,000,000 


STATISTICS    OF    SHEEP    AND    WOOL. 


659 


Wholesale  prices  of  wool  per  pound  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States.  1902-1906. 


Boston. 

New  York. 

Philadelphia. 

St.  Louis. 

D:ite. 

XX  Ohio, 
washed. 

XX  Ohio. 

XX  Ohio, 
washed. 

Best  tub- 
washed. 

Low. 

nigh. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High.  . 

1002. 

Penis. 

27 
27 
27 
27 
27 
27 
27 
28 
29 
30 
29 
32 

32 

31 
31 
31 
30 
31 
33 
33 
34 
34 
34 
34 

33'; 

33 

33 
32 
32 
32 
34 
34 
34 
34 
35 
34 

34 
-    34 
34 
34 
84 
36 
35 
36 

36 

30 
35 

:;-, 

34 

! 

34 
34 
34 
34 
34 
34 
334 

34 

Cents. 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27', 

2S" 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

32', 

33" 

32 

32 

32 

34 

34 

35 

35 

35 

35 

35 

34 
34 
34 
34 
33 
34 
35 
35 
35 
35 
36 
30 

35 
35 
35 
35 
36 
37 
37 
37 
37 
37 
36 
36 

36 

:,!'. 

34$ 

344 

34*. 

:;-47 

:."■ 

35 

34  j 

34 

m 

Cents. 
20 
26 
26 
26J 
2-T 
264. 
264. 

2!ii; 

Cents. 
27 
27 

27* 

2Vi 

27: 

27.'. 
27 1 
27* 

CattS. 

20 
28 
26 
20 
26 
20 

26  j 

27  j 
27 
27 

31 

31 
31 

31 
31 
31 
30 

32 
32 
32 
33 
33 
33 

33 
33 
33 
325 
31| 
31 J 
33 
33 
33 
33 
334. 

34 
34 
34 
34 
34 
34 
35 
35 
35 
34 
34 
34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

334. 

:;:;.'. 

33| 

33| 

33 

33 

Cents. 

27 
27 
27 

27 

27 
27 

27'. 

29 

30 

32 

32 
32 
32 
32 

32 

31 
33 
33 
33 
34 
34 
34 

33 
33 

33 
33 

324. 
314 
33 
33 
33 
33 
334 

36 
35 
35 
35 
36 
36 
30 
36 
36 
35 
35 
35 

"    35 
35 
35 

35 

35 

34  J 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

Cents. 

24 

2-1'. 

Cents. 
244. 

244 

24             24 

April 

24             24 

May 

24             25 

J  uue 

24              25 

July 

24             25'. 

25*           204. 

26*          274 

2t4 

28  '          27 

28 

30 

31 
31 
31 
31 
30 
30 
30 
31 
28 
28 
28 
28 

2S 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
28 
32 
34 
32 
32 
32 

32 
32 

31 
31 

32 
32 
35 

35 
34 

35 

XX  w 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 

20 
32 

32 
32 
32 

32 
33 
31 
31 
33 
32 
32 
32 
32 

32 
32 
32 
32 

32 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 

35 
3.5 
34 
36 
36 
36 
30 
39 
38 
38 
38 
38 

ashed. 
38 
38 
38 
38 
3S 
38 
38 
38 
38 
38 
38 

38 

27'.            28  4 

28            29 

1S03. 

29             29 

29  (           29 

28             29 

Apnl     . 

27  !          28J. 

May 

27 

23             29 

July 

29             294 

29 
30 
SO 

29! 

30 

304 

31 

December 

30  i           30  4. 

1&04. 

30'           304 

30!           31 

March 

304           31 

304           31 

30  J 

32             33 

July 

33             344 

35             35 

35             36 

October 

34',            30i 

37            40 

40              41 

1905. 

40              41 

39  i           41 

37             38 

37              394 

30 
41 
41 

414 

42 

42 

41 

41 

33 
31 
30 
30 
38 
38 
38 
37 
37 
37 
37 
38 

43 

424. 
42 

July 

«4 
42 

424 

42 

414 

1900. 

35 

38 

38 

40 

39 

384, 

384. 

38 

38 

37 '. 

38 

660  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Range  of  prices  per  pound  of  ivool  in  Boston,  monthly,  1902-1906.a 


Date 


1902. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1903. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1904. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1905. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1900. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 


Ohio  fine, 
unwashed. 


Low.  High 


as. 

19i 

20" 

191 

19J 

19 

19 

20 

20 

21J 

211 

2l| 

23 


23 


as. 

20 

20 

191 

191 

19V 

20 

20 

21 

211 

21» 

22 

23 


Indiana 
quarter- 
blood, 
unwashed. 


Low.  High, 


as. 

22 
22 
211 
211 
201 
204 
21" 
22 
22 
23 
23 
24 


231 
24 
22 
22 
22 
22 
23 
24 
24 
24 
24 
24 


24 

24.'* 

241 

25 

24 

L>4 

27 

28 

28 

28 

30 

31 


a.«. 

22 
22 
22 

21i 
20* 
21" 
22 
23 
23 
23 
23 
24 


25 
251 

2'..', 
251 
25 
27 
30 
30 
29 
30 
32 
33 


34 

34 

32J 

32! 

321 

32} 

34 

34 

34 

34 

311 

32 


Ohio  XX, 
washed. 


Low.  High 


as. 

27 

27 

27 
27 
27 
27 
27 
28 
29 
30 
29 
32 


34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

34 

331 

331 

34 


as. 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27?, 

28 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 


321 
33 
32 
32 
32 
34 
34 
35 
35 
35 
35 
35 


36 
341 
341 

34> 
341 
341 
35 
35 
;:r. 
■Ml 
34 
341 


Ohio,  No.  1, 
washed. 


Low.  High 


as. 

27 

27 

261 

26i 

26" 

26 

26 

28 

29 

30 

30 

31 


as. 

27 

27 

27 

261 

26" 

26 

27 

29 

30 

30 

31 

31 


Ohio 
Delaine, 
washed. 


Low.  High 


as. 

28 

28 

28 

28 

28 

28 

28 

30 

311 

311 

311 

33 


34 

34 

331 

331 

331 

34 

36 

36 

36 

36 

35 

35 


35 

35 

35 

34 

34 

34 

35 

351 

351 

35! 

35.'. 

37 


37 
36 
36 
36 
36 
39 
38 
39 
39 
37 

3i;'. 
36" 


361 

361 

3l>! 

361 

361 

36 

361 

36 

36 

351 

351 

36j 


as. 

29 
29 
29 

281 

281 

29 

31 

33 

32 

32 

33 

35 


37 
37 
37 
37 
37 
37 
37 
37 
37 
37 
3t,l 

371 


Michigan 
X.  washed. 6 


Low.  High 


a  Furnished  by  Commercial  Bulletin,  Boston. 

b  Since  June  12,  1903,  the  standard  quotation  has  been  Michigan  fine  unwashed. 


STATISTICS    OF    SHEEP   AND    WOOL.  661 

Range  of  prices  per  pound  of  wool  in  Boston,  monthly,  1902-1906 — Continued. 


Date. 


Fine  select-    Fine  medi- 
ed  Terri-    |   um  Terri- 
tory, staple  tory,  eloth- 
scoured.    !  ing  scoured. 


1902. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1903. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1904. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1905. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 

1906. 

January 

February 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September 

October 

November 

December 


High. 

Low. 

55 

44 

55 

46 

55 

45 

52 

44 

52 

42 

52 

42 

55 

45 

57 

47 

57 

49 

57 

49 

58 

49 

59 

50 

GO 

54 

58 

52 

56 

52 

55 

52 

55 

50 

55 

50 

55 

52 

•56 

52 

56 

52 

56 

52 

56 

51 

55 

51 

52 

50 

55 

50 

55 

50 

55 

50 

53 

50 

58 

50 

62 

53 

63 

58 

65 

58 

65 

60 

70 

60 

70 

65 

70 

62 

70 

60 

68 

60 

70 

60 

74 

62 

76 

65 

78 

67 

78 

67 

78 

68 

78 

68 

78 

66 

78 

66 

78 

65 

76 

66 

73 

66 

73 

66 

73 

66 

73 

66 

75 

68 

75 

68 

75 

68 

75 

65 

72 

65 

73 

66 

Texas,  12 

months, 
scoured. 


Low.  High 


Fine  free 
fall,  Texas 
or  Califor- 
nia scoured 


Low.  High 


46 


Pulled,  A 

super, 
scoured. 


Low.  High 


Pulled,  B 

super, 

scoured. 


Low.  High. 


2 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGBICULTUEE. 


SWINE. 

■:t  and  far 


t  d  farms  January 


. 


Y  -:  : 


Nino]  Be. 


per  head. 


. 


1     



ISB9 



IS     



B 



-      62,20 

-       . 

.       "   .  • 





34 

1881 a    247 

1832 ... 

18S3 



.      ' 

iSv i       92,04 



1888 

UBB 1,592 

189' 

U91 25,10 

1892 

am 





UBf .       . 

1897 



1899 

an -    -     • 

fan ■.     . 



19J: ._     2 

MM 

1906 17,320,511 

1906 .       .       " 




$4.03 

4.01 

• 
4.80 
6.00 
5.66 

5.57 

"     . 

4.9v 

n 
4  is 

■  ■ 
i 

4.35 

4.39 

4.40 

■  I 
. 

6.15 

"     - 


2 
! 

!     --- 

127,45 

22 

- 

IS  -  251,110 

i     - 

S     •""   .. 

'  :  ' 

71      "   i 

SI        !        .. 

! 

220,8] 

7  1 

-       193,923 

•1,415 
295,43      ■   . 

27       ■       . 

272   77 
174.  35 

i 
'      72      _ 

342. 1 2 
364.  " 
! 

417,791     . 


»73 

1,399 


$40,092 
i 


-     ■ 

! 

•  77 

61.390 

7.00 

n 

". 

-  ■ 

1,625 

10.25 

-    2 

"       -   " 

11.38 

" 

9.85 

" 

.     74 

9.13 

75,12 

'       .   2 

9.32 

S3, 434 

. 

5.05 

"" 

"".       • 

7.39 

■ 

: 

14.01 

. 

272   " 

16.90 

- 

23     ■ 

i 

55       ' 

" 

" 

' 

2     2   " 

9.09 

75     J 

5      75 

7.49 

.     "■- 

193.017 

8.13 

- 

356. 764 

7.91 

91,148 

2 

" 

1.146.630 

11.99 

11.39 

23     75 

397. 162 

75 

9.50 

! 

- 

10.16 

- 

227  .   " 

10.80 

.-    751 

.    " 

10.30 

14,411 

2 

7.67 

: 

6.88 

7.71 

-. 

.    ■ 

10.68 

- 

10.56 

. 

10.15 

6.345 

-    ; 

- 

" 

630. 998 

10.66 

13. 19 


lue  of  "  ■Slates  on  Janu 




Vermont 

Rhode  Island 

setic  .: 

Fork 

I  rrS-rT 

Pennsylvania. . . . 

Delaware 

and 



.  oia... 

ina.. 

.  Carolina.. 

Georgia 

Florida 

Obi  

Indiana 



M. .  ...r  ." 

Wist   oai 

K.-_:    •    ■ 



iri 

.  Dakota... 


:. 

i 

61,  707 

1   .  • 

"    •-, 

9.00 

10.00 

- 

9.90 

1 

.     25 

.- 

156,952 

::.  • 

989  G85 

9.40 

46,491 

-    • 

296.130 

2 

'     •       -s 

i   25 

"■  -• 

6.60 

L,2      784 

5.30 

;    . 

5.60 

1,582,7 

6.00 

- 

3.30 

2. 436. 797 

•   .' 

2.924.87 

VI 

'.•? 

:    -■:-.   r-4» 

■    E 

1.87     20 

' 

.     77.00 

9.00 

9.50 

3.454.950 

' 

.   1    285 

■   75 

»17     2 

- 

711  "" 

-  ■- 

2  ; 

72  --  . 
9,303,039 

71     -■ 

.  _••  ■  : 


2  " 
•  '•-  75 
.     .     744 


h  Dakota . . . 



saa 





ma 

issi]  pi 

Louiaiaii 

Texas 

I 
Oklahc:: 



_ 


la 

Idaho 

ington. 

Ore?  i 


- 

! 
1.213.380 

I   25     25 

2,86       " 
Tt       . 

1,174,20 

16.777 

124.54-5 

23.291 

55 

22 
172     " 


■  2 

•  - 

5.50 

i 

4.  75 

7.40 
4.15 
9.20 
8.30 

■  ■ 
7.00 

7.50 

-    I 

•  I 
I 

6.90 
I 


$8,831,025 

■    -       75 

252     . 
"     2  I 

_ 

■ 

72 

576   "  : 
139,249 

163,037 
I 

25 


5.54,; 


7.62 


STATISTICS    OF    HOGS. 


663 


Wholesale  prices  of  live  hogs   per  100  pounds  in  leading  cities  of  the    United  States, 

1902-1906. 


Date 


January . . . 
February.. 

Mm  rch 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October... 
November. 
December. . 


January . . . 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 
October. . . 
November. 
December. . 


January . . . 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

June 

July 

August 

September. 

October 

November. 
December . . 


January. .. 
February.. 

March 

April 

May 

Juiie 

July 

August 

September. 
October. .. 
November. 
December. . 


January.. . 
February.. 

March   

April 

May 

June  ...... 

July 

August 

September. 
October.. . 
November. 
December. . 


1002. 


wo:; 


1905. 


1900. 


Cincinnati. 


Packing,  fair 

to  good. 


$0.00 
6.  05 
6.20 
6.75 
6.65 
0.70 
7.25 
6.40 
6.90 
0.  50 
5.85 
6.05 


6.25 
6.70 
7.05 
ft  70 
5.75 
5.70 
5.15 
5.40 
5.80 
5.10 
4  15 
4.25 


4.  75 
4.85 
5.35 
4.90 
4.50 
4.55 
5.25 
5.20 
5.55 
5.00 
4.45 
4.35 


4.00 
4.80 
5.00 
5.25 
5.30 
5.30 
5.45 
5.90 
5.15 
4.95 
480 
4  80 


5.30 

5.  65 

6.30 
6.35 
6.25 
6.30 

6.  65 
6.00 
6.10 
6.10 
0.10 
0.  10 


$6.  50 
6.50 
6.95 
7.30 
7.25 
7.70 
8.00 
7.70 
7.80 
7.70 
6.60 
6.65 


6.95 
7.30 
7.75 
7.45 
6.85 
6.25 
5.90 
6.05 
6.35 
6.20 
5.35 
4  95 


5.25 
5.85 
6.  00 
5.50 
5.00 
5.55 
5.95 
5.85 
6.25 
6.10 
5.20 
4  90 


4.95 
5.35 
5.65 
5.80 
5.60 
5.55 
6.20 
6.35 
6.25 
5.70 
5.15 
5.45 


5.80 
5.45 
6.75 
6.75 
6.62 
6.85 
6.95 
6.72 
6.80 
6.80 
6.50 
6.55 


St.  Louis. 


Mixed  packers. 


Low.      High. 


SO.  10 
5.85 
5.80 
6.80 
6.70 
6.95 
7.50 
6.70 
7.30 
6.40 
6.05 
5.95 


6.15 
6.60 
6.95 
6.50 
5.80 
5.50 
5.30 
5.20 
5.55 
5.30 
4  50 
4  20 


4.  65 
4  70 
5.20 
4.75 
4  55 
4  57 
5.10 
5.10 
5.30 
4  90 
4.50 
4.25 


4  75 
4.97 
5.25 
5.60 
5.40 
5.42 
5.75 
6.30 
5.00 
5.15 
4  95 
5.00 


5.10 
5.35 
6.10 
6.25 
6.22 
6.20 
6.55 
6.05 
6.12 
6.15 
6.07 
5.95 


S6.  90 
6.50 
6.924 
7.50" 
7.50 
7.95 
8.15 
8.12J 
8.20 
7.90 
6.90 
6.70 


6.95 
7.30 
7.60 
7.40 
7.05 
6.20 
5.95 
5.90 
6.20 
6.25 
5.50 
4  85 


5.25 

5.80 

5.75 

5.671 

4  90 

5.50 

5.75 

5.721 

6.25 

0.30 

5. 17* 

4  85" 


Chicago. 


Low.      High. 


84  40 
4  40 
4  75 
5.40 
5.40 
5.65 
5.70 
5.30 
5.50 
4  50 
4  60 
4  60 


5.00 
5.30 
6.00 
6.30 
5.10 
5.25 
4  60 
4  50 
4  85 
4  00 
3.75 
3.80 


3.85 
3.90 
4  00 
3.75 
3.70 
4  00 
4  70 
4.60 
4  70 
4  40 
3.65 
3.60 


5.02 

3.90 

5.  20 

4  10 

5.57 

4  15 

5.70 

4  50 

5.  57 

4  60 

5.  65 

4  50 

6.20 

4  80 

6.  35 

5.25 

6.  00 

4.40 

5.  55 

4  40 

5.  12$ 

4  20 

5.30 

4  50 

5.45 

4.60 

6.20 

5.10 

6.45 

a  50 

0.  65 

5.15 

6.57 

5.10 

6.75 

5.25 

6.97 

5.60 

6.67 

5.10 

6.67 

5.25 

6.70 

5. 16 

6.  42 

5.20 

6.45 

5.30 

SO.  S5 
6.  S3 
7.00 
7.50 
7.50 
7.95 
8.75 
7.95 
8.20 
7.90 
6.95 
6.85 


7.00 
7.55 
7.85 
7.65 
7.15 
6.35 
6.20 
6.15 
6.45 
6.  .50 
5.50 
4  90 


5.20 
5.80 
5.  821 

5.30 
4  95 

5.  47 
5.90 
5.80 

6.  37* 
6.  27| 
5.25 
4  87i 


5.00 
5.15 
5.55 
5.  7 J.1 
5.65 
5.65 
6.15 
6.45 
6.20 
5.  SO 
5.25 
5.35 


5.70 

6.40 

6.55 

6.821 

0.  671 

6.  85' 

7.00 

6.80 

6.80 

6.85 

6.  50 

6.55 


Omaha. 


Low. 


$5.  40 
5.25 
5.50 
6.20 
6.50 
6.70 
6.85 
6.50 
7.05 
6.40 
5.95 
5.  75 


6.00 
6.35 
6.75 
6.60 
5.50 
5.50 
4  90 

492; 

5.05' 
4  80 
410 
4  15 


4  20 
4  50 
4.60 
4  50 
4  20 
4  27 
4  50 
4.65 
5.00 
4.92: 
4  45 
4  25 


4  30 
4.40 
450 
5.10 
5.00 
4.90 
5.05 
5.50 
4  85 
4  75 
4  50 
4  65 


4.85 
5.25 
5.85 
6.10 
6.10 
6.10 
6.15 
5.45 
5.40 
5.  92i 
5.80" 
5.90 


664 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


EGGS. 

Wholesale  prices  of  eggs  per  dozen  in  leading  cities  of  the  United  States,  1902-1906. 


New  York. 

Cincinnati. 

Chicago. 

St.  Louis. 

Date. 

Average  best  i 
fresh. 

Fresh. 

Average  best 
fresh. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low. 

High. 

Low.   High. 

1902. 

Cents. 
26 
27 

Cents. 
34 
37 

Cents. 
22 
21 
134 
14" 
14 
14 
14 
14 
Hi'. 
18 
19 
21 

20 

12 

12 

12 

134 

134 

12" 

124 

18 

19 

20 

20 

23 

19 

144 

154 

15" 

154 

154 

15" 

16 

18 

21 

22 

22 

24 

144 

15 

15 

14* 

14" 

14 

17 

184 

23 

24 

16 

13 

13 

14 

14 

14 

14 

144 

19 

22 

28 

25 

Cents. 
30 
32 
23 
15 
15 
144 
144 
16 
184 
21 
23 
23 

26 
20 
164 
14 
14 
14 
14 
18 
19 
22 
28 
26 

32 
29 
20 
17 
17 
16 
16 
18 
19 
20 
26 
27 

27 
30 
23 
16 
16 
15 
144 
17 
19 
23 
28 
27 

24 

17 

134 

164 

144 

144 

154 

18' 

21 

24 

29 

29 

Cents. 
18 
234 
13J 
14 
144 
14} 
17 
16 
17 
20 
2 1  j 
20 

21 
14 
124 

124 

13 

124 

11 

10 

16 

17 

18 

22 

22 

18 

14f 

154 

14 

13 

11 

11 

13 

13 

17 

16 

18 

20 

144 

144 

14" 

12 

12 

124 

13 

15 

16 

18 

16 
11 
12 
14 
12 
12 
12 
12 
12 
15 
20 
20 

Cents. 
28 
334 
264 
16 
154 
17" 
18 
18 

204 

22 
24 
25 

264 

20" 
20 
154 
15" 
154 
16 
19 
20 
23 
28 
30 

344 

334 

20 

184 

18 

174 

20 

204 

22 

234 

28 

30 

31 

36 

31 

19 

184 

174 

204 

22 

224 

25" 

30 

31 

27 

214 

17 

194 

18* 

19" 

184 

204 

244 

27 

32 

36 

Cents. 
22 
21 
134 
134 
134 
13 
11| 
13 
15 
17 
194 
2DJ 

17J 

124 

11 

11 

12J 

124 

11 

14 

184 

19 

214 

24 

28 
173 

13i 

144 

13 

14', 

13" 

16 

174 

19 

214 

24 

22 

28 

14 

144 

124 

14" 

104 

14 

164 

164 

19 

224 

14 

114 

12 

13J 

13 

15 

12* 

13" 

15 

18 

20 

21 

Cents. 
26 

32 

154     30 

264 

154 

16 

17 

18 

18 

20 

21 

22 

24 

24 
16 
144 
15 

16 

174 

184 

154 

19" 

21 

90 

28 

27 

20 

16 

17 

17 

174 

174 

19" 

20 

20 

21 

20 

22 

24 

17 

174 

174 

164 

164 

18 

20 

21 

25 

26 

174 

154 

144 

17 

16 

17 

17 

18 

21 

20 

20 

22 

18 

174 

20 

20', 

21 

24 

25 

26 

29 

2S 

25 

21 

174 

19 

194 

23 

26 

28 

33 

45 

45 

47 
40 
25 
21 
21 
21 
24 
26 
30 
30 
38 
40 

40 
40 
40 
21 
21 
22 
25 
28 
30 
35 
40 
40 

34 
27 
22 
22 
21 
23 
25 
28 
33 
35 
42 
45 

154 

May 

15 

15J 

July 

144 

16 

20 

184 

224 

224 

1903. 

224 

18 

164 
14i 

14 

15 

July 

124 

19 

19 

21* 

26 

28J 

1904. 

29 

29 

16 

154 

154 

154 

July 

174 

19* 

204 

204 

27 

27 

1905. 

29 

34 

224 

154 

164 

154 

July 

14 

161 

164 

19 

24 

24 

190C. 

22 

17 

15 

16 

14 

17 

July 

13 

15 

174 

22 

26 

26 

TRANSPORTATION    RATES. 


665 


TRANSPORTATION  RATES. 

Quotations  of  oc can  freight  rates  on  corn,  wheat,  cotton,  and  lard  from  United  States 
ports  to  Liverpool  diiring  1906. 


Article  and  port. 


Corn  and  wheat  (per 
CO  lbs.) : 

Boston 

New  York 

Baltimore 

New  Orleans 

Galveston 

Cotton(perl001bs.): 

Boston 

New  York 

Baltimore 

New  Orleans 

Galveston 

Lard,  small  pack- 
ages (per  100  lbs.): 

Boston 

New  York 

Baltimore 

New  Orleans 

Galveston 


Mean  for  month. 


Jan.    Feb.    Mar.    Apr.    May.  June.  July.   Aug.    Sept.   Oct.    Nov.    Dec. 


Cents. 
5.25 
4.72 
5.51 
7.75 
G.75 

17.00 
19.00 
25.00 
35.50 
35.65 


19.69 
18.98 
21.09 
27.00 
20.00 


Cents. 
4.07 
4.07 
3.94 
6.82 
6.38 

14.75 
18.00 
21.50 
33.00 
30.58 


16.88 
16.88 
19.69 
27.00 
18.00 


Cents 
3.36 
3.26 
3.68 
6.30 
6.00 

12. 

18.00 

15.20 

32.00 

30.00 


16.88 
16.88 
19.69 

25.67 
IS.  00 


Cents 
3.15 
2.89 
3.41 
6.30 
6.00 

11.00 
16.00 
15.00 
30.00 
29.1 


16.88 
16.88 
19. 69 
23.00 
18.00 


Cents 
3.15 
2.76 
3.41 
6.30 
6.00 

11.00 
15.00 
12.00 
29.20 

28.25 


16.88 
16.88 
18.28 
23.00 
18.00 


Cents. 
3.15 
2.20 
2.10 
6.30 
6.00 

10.25 
14.60 
12.00 
28.00 
27.00 


16.88 
16.88 
18.28 
23.00 
17.00 


Cents. 
3.15 
2.43 
3.68 
6.30 
6.00 

10.25 
13.50 
12.00 
26.00 
25.9: 


16.88 
16.88 
18. 28 
23.00 
17.00 


Cents. 
3.15 
3.15 
4.33 
6.51 
6.00 

13.60 
16.00 
16. 00 

30.00 
29. 07 


16.88 
16.88 
18.28 
23.40 
17.00 


Cents. 
3.15 
3.04 
6.17 
7.22 
7.50 

15.00 
18.40 
21.00 
34. 33 
35.00 


16.88 
16.88 
18.28 
25. 00 
19.00 


Cents. 
3.15 
3.28 
3.41 
7.35 
7.62 

14.00 
22.50 
22.00 
39.40 
38.04 


16.88 
16.88 
18.28 
25.00 
21.50 


Cents. 
3.15 
2.63 
3.94 

7.74 
7.62 

12.80 
18.00 
22.00 
40.00 
40.69 


16.88 
16.88 
18.28 
25. 00 
21.50 


Cents. 
3.15 
2.84 
4.73 
7.48 
7.31 

12.00 
17.80 
22.00 
37.50 
38.71 


16.88 
16.88 
18.28 
2S.00 
20.00 


Mean 
for 
year. 


Cents. 
3.42 
3.11 
4.03 
6.86 
6.60 

12.87 
17.23 
17.98 
32.91 
32.44 


17.11 
17.06 
18.87 
24.59 
18.75 


Live  stock  and  dressed  meats,  Chicago  to  New  York  by  rail:  Mean  rates,  in  cents,  per 

100  pounds. 


. 

Dressed 

Dressed 

3 

a 

hogs. 

3 
S 

hogs. 

u 

■a 

o 

■3 

SB 

o 

B 

Year. 

cj 

,9 

o3  . 

o 

Year. 

.3 

O 

"3 

S.E 

es 

■3 

!n  "> 

ss°, 

cS 

o 

O 

H 

ft 

0) 

cj 

XI 
02 

o 

W 

Mc3 

CJ 

ss 

o 
o 

CJ 

C 

o 

K 

p. 

CJ 
CJ 
.3 

m 

O 

w 

2 
P 

60  sj 
CJ 

a  * 

K  cj 

o 
o 

1882 

36 
40 
31 
31 

29 
32 

28 
26 

53 
50 
44 
43 

CO 
60 
60 
60 

57 
64 
51 
54 

1895 

28 
28 
28 
28 

30 
30 
30 
30 

30 
30 
30 
30 

CO 
CO 
60 
CO 

45 
45 
45 
45 

45 
45 
45 
45 

45 

1883 

1896  . 

45 

1884 

1897 

1898 

45 

1885 

45 

1886 

33 

30 

49 

CO 

61 

53 

48 

1899" 

*"i 

*>5 

?"i 

CO 

40 

40 
45 

40 
45 

1887 

33 

32 

40 

CO 

62 

59 

54 

1900 

?8 

30 

30 

CO 

45 

1888  

oo 

">0 

31 

CO 

46 

46 

44 

1901 

*>8 

30 

30 

60 

42  9 

42  9 

1889 

25 
B3 

30 

°8 

30 

30 

CO 
CO 

47 
39 

47 
39 

45 
39 

1902  . 

28 
98 

30 
30 

30 
30 

60 
60 

41.2 
45 

41.2 
45 

41.2 

1890 

1903 

45 

1891 

27 
28 

30 

28 

30 
30 

CO 
CO 

45 
45 

45 
45 

45 
45 

1904  . 

28 

30 
30 

30 
30 

60 
60 

45 
45 

45 
45 

45 

1892 

1905 

45 

1893 

28 
28 

20 
30 

30 

30 

60 
60 

45 
45 

45 
45 

45 
45 

1906 

28 

30 

30 

60 

45 

45 

45 

1894 

o  Rates  did  not  go  into  effect  until  February  1, 1899.    Until  that  time  the  1898  rates  governed. 


666 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


York  by  rail:   Mean  rates,  in  cents,  per  100  pounds. 


Yea  r. 

Jan. 

Feb. 

Mar. 

Apr. 

June. 

July. 

Aug. 

Sept. 

Oct. 

Nov. 

Dec. 

The 
vear. 



39 

39 

39 

34.5 

30.5 

30.5 

30.5 

30.5 

30.5 

30.5 

31.5 

35 

33.41 

1881 

3o 

35 

35 

30.5 

" 

_'   " 

21.5 

21.5 

21  5 

21.5 

21.5 

21.5 

26.  73 



21.5 

24.3 

26 

2>; 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

30.5 

1S83 

30.5 

30.5 

30.5 

29.2 

26 

20 

26 

26 

26 

26 

2     " 

30.5 

27.83 



30.5 

30.  5     23. 3 

17.5 

17.  5 

18.  4 

23 

26 

26 

26 

- 

26 

24.  22 

188S 

20 

20.6 

•    " 

17.5 

17.5 

21.5 

21.5 

21.5 

22.  S 

26 

21. 10 

1886 

2 

- 

26 

- 

26 

_ 

- 

26 

26 

27.7 

26.14 

1887 

30.5 

30.5 

30.5 

26 

. 

- 

. 

26 

26 

. 

iss* 

- 

26. 3 

. 

26 

19.9 

17.3 

15.5 

18.8 

21.  5 

23.6 

23.11 



. 

- 

- 

26 

26 

26 

26 

_ 

. 

2 

26 

26 

1890 

26 

. 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

24.  8 

20 

20 

20 

20 

23.89 

1891 

20 
- 

21.5 
26 

26 
26 
26 
26 

26 
26 
26 

- 

- 
26 

.   ; 
_ 

26 
26 

26 

26 

_ 

_ 

- 

26 

26 

26 

_ 

_ 
26 

2b 

- 

26 
26 
26 

26 
26 
26. 

26 

2-3 

26 

- 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

. 

26 

26 

26 

26 

- 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

- 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

-     1 

- 

26 

- 

26 

26 

26 

26 

-• 

20 

26 

. 

26 

26 

26 

21.5 
26 
26 
26 

26 
26 
. 
26 

26 

_ 
26 

- 

26 

26 

21.  5 

26 

2 

26 

26 

26 

_ 

26 

_ 
. 
26 

26 

21.5 

26 

- 

26 

26 

26 

26 

_ 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

21.5 

26 

- 

26 

26 

26 

26 

21.5 

2 

26 

26 

26 

26 

23 

26 

26 

21.5 

26 

26 

26 

26 

21.5 

26 

- 

26 

26 

26 

21.5 

_ 

26 

21.5 

20 

26 

26 

I 

26 

26 

21.5 

26 

- 

26 

26 
21.5 

25.  36 

1890 

23.70 

1S93 

25.43 

1894 

26 

iS95 

1896 

26 

1S97 

- 

_ 



24.  S3 



1900 

26 

1901 

26 

1901 

26 

19< '3 

26 

1904 

26 

1905 ...                  

25 

1906... 

26 

Compressed  cotton,  by  rail:  Mean  rates,  in  cents,  per  100  pounds. 


From  Xew  Orleans  a 

From  Mem- 

From New  Orleans  a 

From  Mem- 

to 

phis  to — 

Year. 

to 

— 

phis  to— 

Year. 

J 

g 

- 

- 

g 

-i 
— 

z 
> 

-- 
— 

a 
I 

z 
> 

a 

z 

a 

z 

o 

> 

— 
_= 

w  Y, 

c 

i 

- 

- 

z 

C 

:. 

- 

=: 

- 

X 

- 

- 

z 

- 

m 

fc 

- 

- 

z        pq 

1883 

60 

■ 

52 

72 

77 

1S95 

53 

48 

4^ 

-> 

50.5       55.5 

1884 

60 

• 

53 

52 

54 

.59 

1896 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50.5       55.5 

1S85 

60 

U 

.53 

52 

■ 

58 

1S97 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50           55 

1n80 

2 

47 

45 

44 

53         58 



55 

50 

50 

50 

47           52 

1887 

50 

45 

43 

42 

53         58 

1S99 

'- 

47 

47 

47 

48           53 

1888 

50 

45 

43 

42 

47         52 

1900 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50. 5       55. 5 

1889 

52 

47 

45 

44 

50. 5     55 

1901 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50. 5       55. 5 

1890 

55 

50 

50 

50. 5     55 

1902 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50. 5       55. 5 

1S91 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50.5     55 

1903 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50. 5       55. 5 

1S92 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50. 5     55 

1904 

55 

50 

50 

50 

50. 5       50. 5 

1893 

55 

50 

50 

50 

47         52 

1905 

55 

50 

50 

50 

40.  5       45. 5 

1S94 

51 

50 

50 

50 

50. 5     55. 5 

1900 

50 

50 

50 

50 

40. 5       45. 5 

a  These  rates  are  mainly  used  for  basing  purposes. 


TRANSPORTATION    RATES. 


667 


Corn  and  wheat:  Mean  proportional  export  freight  rates  per  100  pounds  from  Kansas  City 
and  Omaha  to  leading  Calf  and  Atlantic  ports  during  the  calendar  years  1905  and  1906. 


Destination  and  article. 

From  Kansas 
City. 

From  Omaha. 

1905. 

1906. 

1905.     ;    1906. 

New  Orleans: 

Corn 

Cents. 

14.  S 

6  16.1 

14.8 

6  16.1 

22.2 
d  2.3.  0 

22.  2 
d  25. 0 

21.2 
'24.0 

20.7 
<*23.5 

Cents, 
a  16.  5 
»17.1 

16.5 
17.1 

23.4 
t  21. 5 

23.4 

■  21. 5 

22.4 
«20.5 

21.9 
«20.0 

Cents. 

15.8 

6  17.4 

15.8 
6  17.4 

22.  2 

<*2o.O 

22.2 
<*25.0 

21.2 
<*24.0 

20.7 
d23.b 

Cents. 

-   - 

Wheat 

Galveston: 

Corn 

Wheat 

1S.1 
23  4 

Boston:  c 

Corn 

Wheat 

New  York:  c 

Cora 

23.4 
t  21  5 

Wheat 

Philadelphia:  c 

Corn 

22  4 

"Wheat 

«20  5 

Baltimore:  c 

Corn 

21.9 
*20.0 

"Wheat 

a  From  April  25  to  August  10,  1906,  inclusive,  rates  used  in  computing  this  average  include  delivery 
on  board  ship. 
6  For  July  25  to  December  31,  1905,  inclusive. 
c Rates  include  delivery  on  board  ship. 
d  For  second  half  of  1905  only. 
e  Average  based  upon  rates  in  force  for  two  periods,  amounting  together  to  about  30  days. 

Corn  and  Wheat:   Mean  rates,  in  cents,  per  bushel,  Chicago  to  Xeic   York. 


Year. 


Corn. 


By  lake         By  lake 
and  canal."     and  rail. 


By  all  rail. 


By  lake 
and  canal.'* 


By  lake 
and  rail. 


By  all  rail. 


1S75. 
1876. 
1877. 
1878. 
1879. 
1880. 
1881. 
1882. 
1883. 
1884. 
iss.-,. 
1886. 
1887. 
1888. 
1889. 
1890. 
1891. 
1892. 
1893. 
189'4. 
1895. 
1896. 
1897. 
1898. 
1899. 
1900. 
1901. 
1902. 
1903. 
1904. 
1905. 
1906. 


8  75 

9.59 

&83 

10.49 

13.41 

7.77 

0.  72 

8.03 

6.55 

0.3 

S.  45 

8.5 

6.71 

6.32 

5.93 

6.32 

5.95 

7.18 

4.93 

4.50 

5.75 

153 

6  3.81 

6  5.08 

6  4.07 

6  4.61 

6  4.83 

6  4.85 

6  3.63 

6  4.  76 

6  5.  51 


11.34 

9.68 

13.42 

10.45 

12.2 

14.43 

9.42 

10.28 

11 

8.5 

8.01 

11.2 

11.2 

10.26 

8.19 

7.  32 

7.53 

7.21 

7.97 

6.5 

6.4 

6.15 

6.  92 

4.41 

5.83 

4.72 

5.16 

5.51 

5.78 

4.82 

5.19 

5.72 


19.5 

14.12 

18.03 

16.39 

14.56 

17.48 

13.4 

13.5 

15.12 

12.32 

12.  32 

14 

14.7 

13.54 

12.  6 

11.  36 
14 

12.96 
13.65 

12.  32 
10.29 
10.5 
11.43 

9.8 
10.08 
9.19 
9.21 
9.94 
10.54 
10.38 
9.40 
9.52 


9.82 
11.09 
9.96 
11.87 
13. 13 
8.67 
7.23 
9.01 
7 

6.54 

9.10 

9.5 

7.05 

6.92 

6,76 

6.95 

G.  45 

7.66 

5.11 

4.86 

6.19 

5.  22 

6  4.45 

6  5.81 

6  4.49 

6  5.11 

6  5.  26 

6  5.4 

t  4.  73 

6  5.  53 

6  6.03 


12.09 
10.19 
14.75 
11.99 
13.13 
15.8 
10.49 
10.91 
11.63 
10 
9.02 
12 
12 

11.14 
8.97 
8.52 
v.  57 
7.59 
8.48 
7 

6.96 
6.61 
7.42 
4.91 
6.63 
5.1 
5.54 
5.89 
6.37 
5.50 
6.40 
6.35 


20.89 
15.12 
19.56 
17.  56 
17.74 
19.8 
14.4 
14.47 
16.2 
13.2 
13.2 
15 

15.75 
14.5 
15 

14.3 
15 

13.8 
14.63 
13.2 
11.89 
12 

12.5 
12 

11.6 
9.96 

10.62 
11.29 
11.12 
9.90 
10.20 


a  Including  Buffalo  charges  and  tolls. 


6  Excluding  Buffalo  charges. 


66S  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGPJCT'LlTTiE. 

is,  per  ton  . 


-  i 

-  > 

p 

K 

|l 

- 

« 

— 

£ 

z 

5 

-  - 

Y> ..:.  • 

H 

a 

a  . 

_   z 

s 

M 

r  _ 

^  -  > 

13 

_     / 

-  ..  -- 

.   - 
-  - 

= 

-"  r        i  = 

- 
5  ? 

- 

x  f» 

- 
- 

— 

X 

>  =  „ 

« 

3  5  s 

A  —  - 
-  -=  - 

> 

X    >.  - 

-   -  u 

—  : 

—  5 
- 
— 

- 

= 5  t 

M 

= 

>  "3 

~ 

pq 

1  ' 

- 

— 

=- 

- 

= 

c  = 

° 

= 

- 

"- 

1875. 

24 

1.  340 

1.119 

1.061 

383 

• 

- 

1.299 

1.091 

-     S3    1.833 

-  1  1 

1    •" 

1.421 

183 

2.218 

1.139 

_ 

972 

.722 

•- 

S3 

. 

583 

"   - 

-  - 

' 

1.217 

1.955   l.  I3':i 

.954 

•    : 

.813 

.954 

1.  024 

1.035 

1.719 

1.949 

1.361 

2.135 

32 

:  ;>■ 

1878.  .  .  . 

1.  5S2    1.113 

.919 

.960 

.724 

.914 

.985 

1.53V 

1.354 

.   . 

' 

1.296 

183 

299    1.100 

i 

n 

.  041 

S3 

754 

1.523 

. 

1.054 

"-■ 

1.153 

1880.... 

L207 

S3 

• 

73 

.918 

1.543 

1  74 

- 

1.564 

1.232 

1. 038 

n 

.805 

! 

357 

.745 

•  . 

1.522 

L22 

1.241 

.     78 

! 

38 

- 

1.17      1.064 

-  - 

.749 

28 

" 

.752 

.753 

1.417 

-- 

■ 

1.253 

.       - 

1.349 

- 

m 

1.19     1.197 

.  915 

78 

728 

881 

787 

- 

1.433 

i 

1.391 

.   128 

1. 325 

1.205 

1884.... 

1.093 

.  719 

.652 

.804 

~~~ 

- 

1.097 

. 

1.008 

1.  5o« 

1.344 

1.136 

1.  00 

.944 

•- 

i 

.  553 

' 

.577 

- 

.550 

" 

1.043 

1  278 

1.009 

1.420 

1.159 

1.011 

1.07 

1.101 

!   ' 

" 

.639 

.  755 

.541 

1.157 

1.071 

■ 

- 

" 

.999 

• 

1.13 

1.107 

i  . 

33 

" 

.730 

717 

.537 

S3 

1.012 

1.089 

- 

1.213 

1.075 

.984 

1888... 

1.116    1.099 

.753 

.716 

• 

.723 

• 

.541 

• 

1.020 

.973 

1.170 

1.049 

1.001 

1889 

1.015   1.030 

i 

- 

.632 

.685 

.69 

'    • 

• 

.971 

.     •  " 

'-' 

• 

.922 

1S90 

"    1. 105 

.730 

■ 

.044 

.501 

.942 

i 

.995 

-   • 

1.138 

75 

.941 

.991'  1.0S9 

.74:i 

.630 

.  656 

.70 

.  525 

.934 

1.039 

1.003 

.980 

1.131 

■ 

•    ' 

1892.... 

.925   1.057 

.614 

.602 

.  047 

~ 

".- 

.90> 

1. 055 

.973 

1.080 

-    - 

1893.... 

.92;: 

.701 

.031 

.599 

- 

.511 

--" 

1.039 

.949 

1.033 

" 

S78 

1894. . . . 

.  895     .  944 

.733 

- 

S3 

- 

m 

- 

•      1.037 

.974 

.970 

87 

• 

1895.... 

87* 

". 

.004 

" 

.565 

.04 

.425 

■ 

.     34 

.994 

i 

.831 

- 

1896.... 

.864 

• 

.  551 

' 

.425 

.745 

1.017   1.003 

" 

'" 

- 

1897..-. 

.918 

" 

.610 

'   - 

.501 

.60 

.419 

-- 

*    1.008 

.891 

. 

" 

1  • 

1898.... 

.S44 

.  0/5 

.530 

.511 

.57 

' 

.972 

• 

.950 

!  3 

.753 

1899.... 

.771 

" 

.539 

.481 

- 

.50 

. 

-■ 

.996     .937 

90 

1.016 

724 

1900.... 

■  i 

SSE 

••- 

.504 

• 

.343 

9 

.  987     .  930 

.794 

1.050 

!752 

.729 

1901.... 

.831 

.  575 

.  015 

-• 

i  - 

.56 

•• 

1. 00; 

72 

. 

-- 

■'■ 

1902.... 

' 

.632 

.  503 

.590 

.61 

.4Cr2 

.- 

L034 

n 

.979 

'-'-- 

1903.... 

• 

- 

.037 

.519 

5  - 

- 

.475 

.591 

L013        •   ' 

" 

J 

1904 

.052 

2 

.60 

.470 

" 

.944     .S91 

" 

83 

-   1 

78 

1905 

(c) 

.638 

.645 

.524 

.604 

■" 

13 

'■" 

.93: 

• 

■ - 

■ 

.766 

•ntioned  end  en  J  ... 

lor  different  railways. 
*  Leased  by  the  Boston  and  Maine  Rafln 

Bed  by  the  New  York  Central  and  Hudson  Rivtr  Railroad. 


TRANSPORTATION    EATES. 
Average  rates,  in  cents,  per  passenger  per  mile. 


669 


Year.a 

P3 

to 

u 

- 
o 

0, 

1 

fit 

< 

1 

O 

OS  - 

~  > 

S  = 

o 

C  3 

—  — 

o 
w 

c 
u 

§  n  >. 

--.--  p 

OJ 

'£ 

> 

C 

c 

M 

-•0 

3       P 

m  &c 

SIS 

a 

=3 

o  >> 
.*£ 

c 

&.2 

cJJ= 

«o 

o 
.d 

a 

a 
O 

"c 

pa 

-  =   > 

em/: 

«_ 
■2  5 

a 
o 

OS  £ 
u 

>> 
« 

'3 

rt 

o 
'£ 

£     ■ 

~- 

'5 

o 
fi 

c  o 
— i  *j 

>  o 
'3 '3 
"P 

* 

° 

Z 

w 

J 

h 

Si 

a 

M 

o 

o  ~ 

O 

p 

3 

1S75 

1.910 

2.  ISO 

1.885 

1.955 

2.088 

2.259 

2.407 

3.231 

2.882 

2.6S7   2.690 

2.755 

2.878 

3.219 

2.378 

1876 

1.864 

2.099 

1.693 

1.859 

1.846 

1.819    1.830 

3.322 

2.804 

2.626    2.805 

2.614 

2.974 

3.018 

2.183 

1877 

1.947 

2. 174 

1.953 

1.772 

2.182 

2.185   2.192 

3.786 

2.942 

2.772   2.994 

2.798 

3.140 

3.167 

2.458 

1878.... 

1.969 

2.217 

1.978 

2.158 

2.255 

2.277   2.258 

3.738 

3.122 

2.933   3.029 

2.795 

3.226 

3.345 

2.573 

1879 

1.888 

2. 137 

2.044 

2.090 

2.221 

2.253   2.22S 

3.630 

3.066 

2.971    2.908 

2.417 

3.444 

2.484 

18S0 

1.885 

2.096 

1.999 

2.041 

2.135 

2.222    2.156 

2.959 

2.514 

2.806    2.868 

2.076 

3.476 

2.442 

1881 

1.820 

1.97C 

1.862 

2.016 

1.988 

2.152    1.895 

2.989 

2.164 

2.666   2.856 

1.828 

3.341 

3.168 

2.446 

1882 .... 

1.715 

1.993 

1.S0S 

1.948 

2.156 

2.249   2.024 

2.605 

2.388 

2.505    2.579 

1.951 

3.300 

2.706 

2.391 

1883 

1.790 

2.088 

1.986 

1.673 

2.196 

2.297    2.193 

2.373 

2.424 

2.504   2.516 

2.141 

3.128 

2.614 

2.402 

1884 

1.651 

1.908 

1.942 

2. 1S9 

2.170 

2.258    2.222 

2.379 

2.225 

2.. 5 72   2.553 

1.900 

2.342 

3.323 

1885 

1.833 

1.838 

1.419 

1.756 

2.058 

1.950,  1.569 

2.27C 

2.211 

2.466   2.563 

2.026 

2.749 

2.103 

2.216 

1886 

1.756 

1.S53 

1.845 

1.89C 

2.098 

2.114   2.13C 

2.131 

2.208 

2.420   2.415 

2.023 

2.135 

2.436 

2.142 

1887 

1.89 

1.880 

1.989 

2.039 

2.260 

2.125   2.25.5 

2.074 

2.268 

2.328   2.538 

2.062 

2.301 

2.394 

2.245 

isv>.... 

1.978 

1.976 

1.967 

1.851 

2.280 

2.111    2.10 

2.025 

2.197 

2.312   2.445 

2.123 

2.248 

2.429 

2.349 

1889 

1.957 

1.869 

1.932 

1.722 

2.286 

2.076   2.18 

1.709 

1.927 

2.285   2.415 

2.12S 

2.135 

2.370 

2.165 

1890.... 

1.915 
1.S69 

1.858 

1.910 

1.584 

2.254 

2.094   2.25 

2.0-56 

2  022 

2.149   2.359 

2.004 

2.045 

2.403 

2.167 

1891.... 

1.818 

1.905 

1.601 

2.105 

2.070   2.23 

2.155 

2.073 

2.322   2.408 

2.205 

2.059 

2.4S3 

2.142 

1892 

1.916 

1.828 

1.887 

1.5SS 

2.183 

2.028   2.00 

2.181 

2.101 

2.308   2.464 

2.043 

2.104 

2.44,> 

2.126 

1S93 

1.869 

1.835 

1.832 

1.551 

2.195 

1.968    1.98 

1.989 

1.999 

2.095   2.414 

1.981 

1.987 

2.432 

2.108 

1894 

1.851 

1.794 

1.857 

1.509 

2.069 

1.993   2.00 

1.905 

1.925 

1.891    2.191 

1.776 

1.758 

2.365 

1.986 

1895 

1.819 

1.770 

1.837 

1.560 

2.215 

1.971   2.06 

1.980 

1.995 

2.146   2.411 

2.119 

1.962 

2.318 

2.040 

1896 

1.769 

1.752 

1.838 

1.641 

2.148 

1.950    1.88 

1.952 

1.979 

2.108   2.375 

2.117 

2.075 

2.187 

2.019 

1897 

1.811 

1.754 

1.S42 

1.545 

2.108 

1.958 

2.02 

1.980 

1.979 

2.153   2.289 

2.116 

2.101 

2.254 

2.022 

1898 

1.826 

1.750 

1.806 

1.548 

2.032 

1.953 

2.02 

1.943 

1.938 

2.092   2.362 

2.058 

1.945 

2.152 

1.973 

1899 

1.800 

1.744 

1 .  766 

1.536 

2.074 

1.937 

2.02 

1.860 

2.014 

2.036    2.337 

2.055 

1.941 

2.243 

1.925 

1900 

1.805 

1.754 

1,793 

1.54C 

2.223 

1.952 

2.05 

1.973 

2.021 

2.064   2.346 

1.908 

1.968 

2.318 

2.003 

1901 

(*) 

1.742 

1.799 

1.541 

1.993 

1.992 

2.09 

1.9S4 

1.960 

2.095   2.324 

1.936 

2.085 

2.355 

2.013 

1902 

(O 

(<*) 

1.72I' 

1.531 

1.828 

1.999 

2.04 

2.023 

1.999 

2.135   2.317 

1.860 

2.007 

2.319 

1.986 

1903 

(<•) 

(*) 

1.773 

1.50C 

2.066 

2.015 

2.05 

2.044 

1.971 

2.157   2.309 

1.981 

1.941 

2.369 

2.006 

KOI 

(*) 

w 

1.761 

1.452 

2.067 

2.020 

2.03 

2.072 

1.970 

2.203   2.305 

1.948 

1.907 

2.387 

2.006 

1905.... 

M 

w 

1.719 

1.464 

2.055 

2.000 

2.05 

2.019 

1.839 

2.135   2.373 

1.730 

2.231 

2.292 

1.962 

a  Beginning  with  1888,  the  years  mentioned  end  on  June  30;  prior  to  1888  they  cover  different  periods 
for  different  railways. 
b  Excludes  ferry  earnings  at  Jersey  City,  N.  J.,  at  least  since  1891. 
c  Leased  by  the  Boston  and  Maine  Railroad, 
d  Leased  by  the  New  York  Central  and  Hudson  River  Railroad. 

Mean  rates  on  grain,  flour,  and  provisions,  in  cents  per  100  pounds,  through  from 
Chicago  to  European  ports,  by  all  rail  to  seaboard  arid  thence  by  steamers,  from  1S97 
to  1906. 


Shipped  to —         Articles. 


1S9S. 


1899.      1900. 


1901. 


1902. 


1903. 


1904. 


1905.     1906. 


Liverpool 

Do 

Do 

Glasgow 

Do 

Do 

London 

Do 

Do 

Antwerp 

Hamburg 

Amsterdam.. 
Rotterdam... 
Copenhagen.. 
Stockholm. .. 

Stettin 

Bordeaux 


Grain 

Sacked  flour. 
Provisions. . . 

Grain 

Sacked  flour. 
Provisions... 

Grain 

Sacked  flour. 
Provisions... 

...do 

...do 

...do 

...do 

...do 

...do 

...do 

...do 


33.6 

36.81 

44.4 

35.23 

39.06 

52.5 

34.00 

36.12 

48.14 

51.09 

51.00 

52.00 

52.00 

57.28 

68.53 

57.28 

64.13 


34.35 

37.66 

47.15 

36.00 

39.06 

52.5 

35.00 

37.25 

49.69 

52.5 

52.00 

52.5 

52.5 

58.13 

69.25 

58.13 

65.75 


29.72 

3o!l2 

40.5 

32.35 

31.25 

44.69 

30.6 

33.5 

44.14 

47.5 

46.00 

47.00 

47.00 

51.72 

62.97 

51.72 

59.12 


29. 4S 

27.9 

48.84 

30.98 

31.56 

55.31 

31.1 

35.01 

55.87 

51.09 

50.00 

51.00 

51.00 

55.31 

64.5 

55.31 

64.12 


21.47 

23.00 

36.00 

24.1 

24.38 

45.16 

23.23 

25.5 

44.75 

46.25 

44.00 

45.00 

45.00 

47.7.5 

53.25 

47.75 

54.25 


20.85 

23.5 

36.25 

21.75 

22.75 

41.88 

21.75 

24.00 

39.06 

41.5 

39.00 

40.00 

40.00 

42.00 

45.00 

42.00 

51.25 


22.68 

25.19 

41.9 

24.43 

25.38 

46.88 

23.56 

25.19 

44.06 

49.69 

47.1X1 

42.00 

42.00 

49.69 

52.5 

49.69 

56.25 


20.19 
21.00 
36.56 
22.38 
23.20 
44.06 
21.50 
22.2.5 
44.06 
48.28 
46.00 
42.00 
42.00 
46.88 
49.69 
46.88 
56.25 


19.16 
22.40 
38.49 
20  00 
22.50 
43.23 
20.23 
23.64 
40.88 
43.70 
45. 75 
45.42 
44.53 
48.66 
51.47 
48.18 
51.45 


18.75 
20.50 
41.00 
19.25 
23.60 
45.63 
19.25 
22,50 
46.26 
47.61 
49.00 
46.00 
46.00 
51.00 
53.50 
50.00 
53.00 


" 


YEABBOOK    OF    THE    DF.F  -RICULTY 


—  .- 

a 

• 

-.  -r 

: 

a 

X 

- 

--■ 

=       - 

- 

- 

— 

~ 

- 

—  X 

-    - 

.- 

- 

r. 

- 

-  _ 

- 

- 

- 

— 

- 

— 

. 

r- 

— 

n. 

—            —  r. 

_  - 

: 

_ 

- 

r 

- 

> 

~ 

" 

*~ 

- 

- 

-- 

-  - 

■  -. 

3 



- 

- 

- 

—    - 

- 

- 

- 

:      ". 

r< 

x 

-  "- 

a 

:■ 

3 

s  =      -         ~  -      ; 


-         —  —     — 

i-  -*x      zz 

-- 


-     - 
-  - 


- 

—  r: 


3 


"- 


z 
V  — 

—     - 


—  X  =: 


:  _-      3       - 
:   _       r 

-    - "      — "  — '  — '      ss 


■z  e 
=  x      s      c 

: 


.'  —         - 


t: 


- 

—  - 

—  — 


—  —     _ 


z.  r        a 


=  -■ 


-   ■     ~        r; ; 


=  =       (~       r       -z       a-  x 

z  —        z        —        —        .  -   - 
—  —         "  -    - 


a:  —  r:        »= 


-     '        a 


- 

=.  X 

X 

:     — 

— 

: — 
■  = 
=  x 

-    - 


= 


- 
x'x" 


IMPORTS    OF    AGRICULTURAL    PRODUCTS. 


671 


O  Cl  a 

II                CI 

— 

■^  -^*  -<r 

a 

a 

o 

Oi         i~ 

a 

■  ~re 

a  a  x 

t- 

a  a  a 

«           —  T 

cc  ^  ^-* 

r- 

a  <--.           — .  r^  ic 

CO         i= 

- .  5  '- 

a  a  — 

30 

i  -  a            a.  7 1  re 

re       re 

x  «  a.  cc 

—  a  a 

—       oco 

X 

a  -r  t- 

X 

X 

ci  a           re  —  cc 

a.       a 

ue  .e  -r  a 

ci 

CI  —  1- 

^      ue  — 

00  Cl 

N 

-T- 

re  ue           ci  ci  — 

X 

a'. 

a.  x  a  a 

a  i^  ^ 

X 

a 

a 

a.  m  a. 

a 

a                         o 

a 

a 

Cl         1-  — 

x  t^  c> 

J. 

- 

ci 

CJrt 

-r 

a  -r  — 

a- 

— 

Cl 

Cl 

—        :".  — 

re 

^ 

"' 

CN        ^ 

C3 

S 

ci  re  re 

X 

^ 

Cl         -WIS 

- 

r^  ^  r^ 

J. 

-. 

.-.  1      : 

ue      t 

a 

1 

o— i  a 
a  a.  — 

a 

CC 

a.      a  a 

Cl 

a  >--.  a 

a 

X 

a  ri 

re       — 

^ 

a 

ue       re  — 

a 

:~.  n  — 

CO 

a 

-  :i 

^       — 

ue 

1     - 

- 

CO       ue  re 

a 

X 

a 

X  X 

re       x 

ue  a.  ue 

ue  t~  "rr 

5' 

TT 

m      a  — 

—  a    - 

X 

ic  re 

—       c. 

ci 

■-  X 
■<r  ci 

1  - 

^:  ?i  a 
a"  icj  a' 

a 

c:  — 

a' 

Ci 

- 
ri 

—  a  a 

S  — "  DO 

•  e  —  ue 

•_e" 

x  —  a. 

o 

c: 

S|« 

| 



— 

__  .-  _ 

ITI         r^-o 

:t 

:]  —  >--: 

00 

_ 

t-C3               t~--»  i-O 

^r      ^r 

X 

-r  a  —  a 

X  —  r- 

a 

:'-         a   X 

ic 

x  i-  a 

•  ~ 

—  —           re  a  a 

ue        -rr 

a. 

—  . . 

c_i  ci  a. 

— 

ifl  a  t- 

OO        XC1 

- 

«o 

a 

a>t^  ii      x  a  ■- 

a      ■» 

T 

:'l  a  "r- 

t-       Cl  a 

r 

T!  —  — 

.-. 

>- 

—  a           ue  —  a 

-^      a 

a 

a  ci  x  a 

a.  -e  x 

-=■   X) 

-:i*r 

T  . 

a 

a  ;-          c 

t~  a  ci  ci 

^r  -r  a 

a 

c 

t-  i-c  a. 

Cl 

:: 

t~                         a 

—       -  -  - 

tr- 

(fi 

r.  — 

o 

:- 

Cl 

Cl 

■* 

ue 

a 

N       — 

— 

a 

—  ei  ei 

CO 

p. 

EC        re  X 

, 

3  -    a 

a 

« 

ION 

ci      -r 

£ 

1 

t -r 

Cl 

o 

*r         re  :  1 

a 

CO-H 

X 

ue  t~  r : 

a 

ce 

H          ^     -  - 

s 

ci  a  x 

r- 

a 

IT- CO 

^-      -^ 

■  e 

. :  ■  e  a 

X 

CI 

oo      ci  CO 

x  —  i- 

o 

re 

a.  x 

x       — 

t' 

i-  re  :: 

— 

LO 

?. 

ie 

x  »o  a. 

a. 

re  a. 

a 

-: 

r~  a  a 

r- 

:-. 

£  « 

:: 

x  --  a 

VH 

TT 

—  X  X 

X 

t--^" 

a.  a  n 
a  ri  — 

a. 

I- 

Cl 

:i 

re  r^  a 

'- 

^ 

.-. 

•^ 

- 

—  a.  :  i 

r: 

Cl 

:i 

1 

.-: 

X  —  X 

b-        ■»  3 

_ 

—  -•  u- 

^H 

_ 

■cr:            x  —  -c 

a      ue 

_ 

.  e  —  a  ■ : 

i  e  —  -r 

a 

ue  x  _ 

CO        a  ro 

5 

3>CMt~- 

a 

a. 

■v  o            h-  r*-  w 

1-         Cl 

c;  ue  x  x 

CO  CO  c 

a       3  :i 

TTOOd 

10 

a 

L-r  c           o  c  r: 

a.      ce 

a.  r:  ue  rr 

a  t^  r: 

s 

—  IN   Cl 

O      -x 

— 

-:  a.  a 

CO 

— 

x  —             r:  -:  - 

a       a 

r- 

r-  a  a  -r 

a.  —  ue 

a 

—          —   Cl 

- 

i —  g 

3>  CC               —  :  :  K 

1-1      S 

a 

ue  co  re  ue 

X  r-  ^r 

a 

■W  £ 

•  -   30  — 

00 

a. 

^-                       l^ 

r: 

—       ax 

rs  a  a 

a 

Cl 

— "— ' 

a" 

X  a  r- 

■*»• 

a 

ci 

ci 

—         Cl 

a  :-.  i- 

Cl 

^T 

TT 

Cl 

.- 

—  Cl  — 

•o 

,- 

CO         CO  i- 

_ 

r:  re  x 

•^« 

re 

gg 

—      ue 

a 

X  1~  Cl 

:~ 

IC        X  a 
t-      ooa 

a 

a  —  a 

CO 

"^      ^^ 

ue 

a  -r  ue 

a 

OO       • 

i~ 

a.  —  3 

X 

'--- 

re  cj 

ci      a; 

X 

—  ue  t~ 

j 

o     • 

ea      o  a 

r; 

io  ^*  a 

Cl 

•  e" 

x  a 

—      a 

a  X  -r 

- : 

— 

o      no 

r-  re  77 

— 

a 

a-  a 

—          !- 

;- 

I-  r:  CI 

r: 

•°. 

l'- 

1 

u-  a-  ri 

•^ 

— 

t-  :■ 

o 

ue 

::  co  a 

t> 

a  t 

a" 

id  ti'l-i* 

:'. 

a' 

IO 

Cl 

ei 

ue"  cd  re" 

— 

~ 

■<T 

a 

1 

x  x  a 

:" 

';  --  ^ 

00        r~uO 

s 

■^r  l~  r-» 

-7 

_ 

t-C    1]         CB 

a 

a      ue 

— 

'■    a  c~  t  — 

ci  a.  ci 

~e 

ue        CO  EX 

t-  a    i      i-i 

.-- 

so       re 

5 

-r  Cl  :  :  C 

a  ci  x 

t>  c-  a 

a  ~           a 

c 

a      ue 

MZI-T 

a.  r~  a 

a 

a.  ■--  a 

M  X 

x  .:  — 

ci  ue     :       ti< 

a 

re        — 

— 

a  —  :  j  — 

a.  x  ci 

Cl  ci  r- 

a  a 

a  a 

x  n  --. 

CO 

^h       ^r 

r~  a  a  7- 

ue  ci  t 

r: 

-r  X  X 

a 

^ 

x  — ■ ;-  x 

—  a.  a. 

a 

1                   -   - 

1 

c 

a.  — 

.r- 

i-  n  — 

Cl 

Cl 

Cl 

: 

Cl 

a  -t  a 

X 

" 

Cl 

■- 

—  ?.  — 

~-. 

Cl 

o      o-«" 

-. 

—  -7  7\ 

SO 

ue 

a  a 

j       a>      a 

ue 

1 

ue  a  re 

X 

X 

■o      a  a 

7>  —  a 

a 

■  - 

—  a 

re      a 

ci  i-  a 

a 

o      on 

K 

1 

IC 

r~ 

a 

- 

Cl         X 

a 

: 

a 

00 

_ 

a  77  7} 

X 

ra*r- 
-I  X 

■^     a 

a"  — "  a" 

DO  X 

r^ 

a  rt  a 

CO 

i 

ce      o 

TT  —   TT 

a 

a  a 

ri 

tj  a  r* 

ue  ci 

o 

a 

a  —  r: 

a 

ci  Ma  a 

t^ 

Cl 

<a 

r: 

K 

—  ue  ci 

a. 

~ 

T  —  — 

a 

r:  x  a 

:- 

c  i  a i  — 

UC         — <iO 

_ 

—  a  ~- 

X 

- 

a  re 

a      ue 

~  a  a.  a 

a  a.  a 

X 

re  a  a 

~.      no 

—  a  a 

s. 

:: 

re  x 

? 

-r       x 

-  : 

re  r~  a 

t  x  ue 

,            to     oooo 

a.  x  a 

t— 

a  r: 

■S"        X 

^r  X  r;  ^ 

r~  a  c 

!             i-i       ■«•  OS 

■- 

i  —  .- 

I  - 

r-  a 

c 

X         X 

.- 

—  ue  a  a 
x  —  x  a 

-t  x  *r 

re       K 

71  r ' 

— 

t-ue 

a 

Cl         — 

— 

r  -  h-  ue 

a 

c 

t-cs 

a.  a  :  - 

t- 

a 

a 

—  —  a 

a 

c 

— ' 

- 

t X 

h- 

3" 

Cl 

: 

t-   e  .e 

X 

■* 

"r 

— 

-  Cl  — 

"" 

o 

O0         N3 

a 

a  -r  ?) 

s 

a 

Cl  — 

.-         Cl 

T 

t-  a  a 

re 

—       OS  ci 

r^  71  i- 

a. 

a  a 

re       r^ 

a 

a  —  x 

a 

o 

X 

a  a  r 

a. 

:- 

t-  re 

ue       ue 

a.  ue  a 

T 

•>r      o  a 

-r 

o 

r^  r~ 

a      7 

■: 

f-  X  :- 

— 

BO 

r- 

r:-c 

t^. 

x  a 

*&      t^ 

ci re  .e 

C: 

•a  3 

Cl"— . 

: 

—  a  " 

U5 

a 

X 

i 

a 

a 

c 

a  a  -r 

a 

-    ~   T 

CO 

: . 

re 

_- 

i   : 

X    X 

T*_"" 

r 

J  :  : 

e 

—  -  —  _ 

■z 

—  a 

■ef  g 

c 

S  ~   -'   J 

S 

M 

c 

£  -  =  - 
a  a  ~  - 

c 
CO 

M^ 

d 

— 

o 

5a 

a  - 

C 

: 

d   -    -  ~ 

c 

c—  c 

o  : 

z~. 

c  — 

C 

e  i  ■ 

P.-  c 

- 

p 

Jl-iO 

—  •- 

P 

a 

a 

i 

- 

c 
■j 
- 

'■  ; 

•  c 

) 

! 
i 

\  -    s 

> 

— 

3 
© 

0 

c 
— 

a     ;     : 

a  a  n  ■- 
_a  3   I 
-    -   -  - 

■a 

y. 

Cfl 

n  - 

_  a 

a  — 

er  ™ 

:  - 
-  — 

j 

c 

:  - 

0  c 

a—  T 
~- ;1 

r 

c 

- 
[ 

•- 

a 
= 

«    T 

a  s 

'~  — 

1      ~a 

1  j 

cd 

'  a 

•- 

■ 

1 

_r  a:   x  t 
o  eg  ~  o 

§ 

^c 

x      -  u.    - 

=  £-- 
-  8    . . 

'       a.  -   -   - 

r- 

g|ll 

o 

J> 

-     _ 

— 

"o 

a-'w "_  U 

ic"5 

c 

"7-  x 

c 

_ 

u 

a 

~    """ 

^'uv 

—  - 


=  3 


J_rj_0 

3«St 


g  a  r  -a     a 
O  O  M  W     W 


672 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


^.         — i 


cox 

X 

r^ 

1^  CO 

■i 

H  l> 

CO 

1  " 

t 

cb  £ 

—  S-    ~   T-  ~r 

-o 

*-H           "^ 

1^ 

CO 

■Qua 

CB  71  71  —  X 

n 

o 

t^o 

IQ         — 

t- 

CO 

= 

CBO 

'- 

to  to— r  -r  X 

~ 

00 

r^      cb 

^ 

B 

-S"  r- 

- 

— 

o 

CB          CB 

r. 

c 

- 
> 

5S50 

x 

X  — 

■ 

M 

H 

CO 

SO         7-1 

- 

:- 

to 

~l 

c-r 

oc? 

x" 

CB 

77 

r' 

71 

r* 

5 

1 

■ 

a 

•* 

*** 

h- 

<a 

"7 

— 

t- 

CO 

>> 

CO 

'?. 

r^ 

O        CO 

---. 

~ 

IBM 

:-. 

to 

X 

■»     o 

— 

•  - 

o 

- 

- 

= 

o 

PC 

t^         lO 

71 

t-^ 

CO 

e 
.-. 

r 

■v 

- 

a 

•n» 

—i       o 

1- 

•7 

CM 

i 

r» 

r~ 

<-i        o 

- 

00 

O        — i 

71 

■^ 

<y 

e» 

00 

X 

00 

3 

71 

cb  — 

- 

onna  r- 
>o  x  r  i  bc  c 

_ 

[- 

,_, 

00—1 

ob      r~ 

.: 

t- 

CO 

— i  -T 

— 

X 

l-: 

— •  77 

■^        CO 

X 

!- 

BC 

BC 

c5 

rH  -r 

§ 

>~  -r  r:  ao  n 

X 

'" 

CB 

oa  rr. 

•—     a 

■-: 

:7 

o 

7C 

= 

t~  •'B" 

NSOHCI 

X 

r- 

cc 

(^           CB 

BC 

t_; 

TT 

- 
> 

^r  r~ 

71 

71  ~  77  ~.  U3 

r 

•  -. 

— 

t^      o 

77 

X 

'- 

—  be 

X 

00  >H 

T 

M 

lO         M 

X 

- 

TT 

■-: 

<© 

- 

- 

71 

x~ 

X 

CB 

.- 

r 

X 

re 

o 

£ 

^ 

—  — . 

O         X 

77 

_ 

-B" 

■«• 

cb 

-1 

M 

"  "  l7 

cb      r^ 

'-. 

CM 

X 

>v 

to 

"5 

-; 

X* 

O0        CO 
L0        rr 

71 
- 

O 
CO 

CB 

-1 

+^ 

1— 

o 

00 

r. 

X 

C- 

c 

-r- 

CM 

00        X 

~ 

BC 

CO 

t- 

?j 

CO 

CO 

— ' 

71 

r-^ 

r- 

C-l 

l~ 

I— 

— 

c? 

CC 

CO  — 

_ 

S  a  "°  =  ° 

r 

X 

CO 

CMW 

CB         CB 

X 

-- 

^j« 

8 

T  -<r 

X 

■  - 

:: 

M 

-  — 

o      o 

A 

s 

CD 

—I  EC 

x  ^r  be  S  be 

r 

CM 

CO  CS 

t*      Nl* 

T 

t^ 

Ej 

— -«■ 

■  - 

,    ^rftocc 

■-= 

x 

s 

LQ 

CO        o 

BC 

"3 
> 

cm  — 

77 

r :  eb  x  —  . . 

;- 

7 

1--        o 

7 

•  -. 

—  X 

x  — 

X 

« 

00       CO 

uC 

a© 

r 

CM 

x" 

r 

CB 

c 

- 

c 

re 
- 

r; 

O 

•-T.  r-. 

g      7-i 

CM 

— 

BC 

— 

■* 

:: 

E 

O        X 

ao 

- 

X 

>> 

*° 

^ 

t- 

CO        o 

- 

r 

r~ 

71 

n 

LI 

f-         CB 

■c 

— 

C 

77 

c 

r~ 

OB 

t^ 

t^         O 

X 

X 

t^ 

-J" 

l-3 

ri     a 

7 

i- 

c 

CC 

ca 

C? 

■*r 

M         — < 

CO 

ie 

'-7 

CM 

t^ 

l~ 

t^ 

r. 

1 

r. 

r~  c 

_    .- 

—   ~ 

.. 

.. 

j. 

X  — 

f-         CI 

- 

CB 

•W  S 

- 

-T    S 

M 

X  u-7 

00       cs 

c 

:: 

5 

-r 

to  p 

x 

\      SO  I-  T1  T   X 

O 

CM  t^ 

o     *a 

- 

X 

TT 

t~ 

3 
OS 

s 

gg'Sfeg 

X 

■^ 

**r 

O        CM 
C-J       C: 

7 

1C 

E 

— i  t^ 

X 

'"     o»o  t> 

L 

r 

t-^ 

00        CM 

c 

71 

> 

s» 

r 

7 

CM 

t~ 

X 

a 

CB 

— 

•  - 

■a 

1  ^ 

t^ 

r^ 

CO  iH 

-^      tc 

s 

— 

■rf 

CC 

r-i 

o 

>o 

CB           — 

7 

s 

X 

>> 

^r 

X 

i-O 

K 

c-i      r^ 

c: 

X 

:7 

+a 

to 

■fl 

^h      -<r 

BO 

? 

CC 

to 

+3 

= 

X 

■-: 

CO        o 

>o 

t 

X 

C 

N 

■^« 

CB 

CO 

BC 

c 

CC 

c3 
= 

o 

?r 

CO        <- 1 

bt; 

-i 

£ 

'7 

0? 

1 

! 

|| 

CB 

—  1£ 

- 

1   c;  x  x  r^r" 

:- 

r 

X 

CO  — 

TT              —I 

« 

-c 

i-7 

OB  "<T 

-;  >--  x  x  c 

T 

r 

00 

Oi-O 

L.O         C" 

CN 

CO 

s 

■7 

c 

I-  r- 

r..  LtriT 

x 

- 

■3 

O— 1 

■» 

L" 

c 

= 

cT-** 

T 

~.  :  5  -r"  r  f  C 

— 

: 

ccT 

t^ 

BC         lO 

(N 

« 

71 

> 

o  - 

t  i  rr.  ic  oa  x 

— 

r- 

•.; 

O         CB 

uO 

7C 

»-' 

X 

—  *? 

H 

t-iKc«: 

i- 

CM 

BC         CM 

r 

c 

CB 

c© 

-.: 

r- 

CM 

— 

BC 

t- 

7C 

- 

" 

t4 

to 

C5 

II 

00 

1Q  ^ 

bc      c; 

BC 

71 

— 

CS 

s 

CB           t^ 

--7 

7 

X 

'7 

s» 

S 

co     a 

CO 

7 

u- 

71 

— 

»J 

■^ 

■S 

X 

CB           CO 

CO 

i-O 

X 

— 

— 

- 

re 

r-       t~ 

f. 

- 

t~ 

8 

s 

:= 

ei 

co     a 

CO 

'-" 

« 

j^- 

cT 

_r 

c* 

Ci 

*-> 

c>» 

LO 

>c 

w. 

£ 

1  " 

73 

- 

7 

= 

BO 
T3 

•o~£ 

g:« 

|ll 

« 

c 

73 

O 

" 

_c 

c 

§60 

o 

—  T* 

I  a 

0  c 

•a 
J 

J 

= 

- 
> 
I 

b 

1 

c 

c 

c 

« 

i 

i 

c 
- 

• 

"3 
a 
0 

I 

: 

z 

e 

> 
■ 

3 
0 

■3 

= 
o 

| 

a 

c 

(- 
1 

■  = 

o 

■1 

-. 

H 

o 

a  .. 

> 

■ 

o 

- 

3 

•4 

< 

T 

Pi 
W 

■< 

s 

■J 

■< 

5 

-< 

•2     i 

■§     1~- 

o     —  - 

t-.         ~c 

-    Si 

a     s  i 

c  .  =x 
3  s 

) 

c 

> 

r. 

a 
- 

a 

: 
I 

c 

c 

- 

C 

c 

!3 

c 
a 
P 

c 

"c 

I 

c 

c 

r 

s 

a 
3 
pa 
< 
g 
S 

1! 

i  a 

—  X! 

o' — ' 
C  = 

"   E 

|  E 

c; 

O 
o 
o 

X3 
O 

■c 
a 

o 
a 

77 

a? 

il  = 
SO 
o 
o 

1  X 

■-  p 

-r 

2  p 

c 
c. 
c 
c 

0 

1 

9 

"c 
c 

c 

s 

c3 
O 

o 

O  tr 

■c 
c 

•3  = 
5  c 
c  c 

o 

5  -  x  x  C 

o  5 

an  -. 

c  £  "- 

O 

C 

e 

5 

o 

o 

Ph 

<r 

po 

U 

O 

IMPORTS    OF    AGRICULTURAL    PRODUCTS. 


673 


OS  ©  C  H  00  X)  O  " 
lOCOOOCC^tOtNCO 


SI] 


t>  :i  c  /  -=•  -*  x  i 


:  re  es  to  ( 

3CO-VCCC-   . 

OOMOl'N^OlNO 


1-1  .-I      W3 


M  N  —  — i  *<r  ce  CO  O 

co  oo  io  c©  co  oo  oo"  oo 

CO      i-h  O  O  OS  i-t 


:  ri  ri  x  m  r^  o  x 

.■VCO-hOCICCO 


30  to  co 
t--  oi  "^r 


•^  O  OO  iO  O  *C  tC ■  i— 

HOcooooiOa 

l1  (M  5  -t  iO  O  M  Ci 


-r  X  X  O  -*  —  O^r 


O  HOOQH 


co  oa 

CO  00 


id  oo  «  ©  00 

^4"  — T oToT  V1  co"  wf  o" 

OOCCHHTOK 

OtTof       r-T^"  rH  IO  i-4 


OCC^HCNiC"O-<»,00 
Ol  N  N  IN  CO  CD  ri  C) 
iC  i— t  00  CO  t-  '-O  CM  T 

o"  cd  *£  co  ©  »o  oT  tp 

VH  PI   CJ   C   O   -1 


^h  <m  ph  eg  iq  c  ' 

cs  ph  --^  on  ci  ph  ■< 

*0  O  Tl  "•£   X  '-"  " 


a 


NOOhOX  tO  CS  N 
OS  CM  M  X  ^~   X  X  CS 

CCOOOOCOCCNQ 


O  CM         p-i  CO  — <  CO  p-< 


3     3 


71  O  -  N  C  T  N  t- 

t"  oo  ^**^  o  p-T  tC  q 


SHHIOOONpiH 

ph  03  OS  (N  C  CI  (M  V 


C)  ^  CO  kO  N  lO  ph  N 
H  CN  r-T         V  O  ph" 


*.  CO 
EC  00 


foi  -^  OS  ro  ro  co  co 
r^  »o  — <  -,c  l-  jc  x 
t—  o  oo  os  -^r  io  o 

uft-c  c^~ oo  aoT cT 


0    5c 


a  a 

3  O 


J  TJ  TJ  "O  "C  *C  TJ 


CD 


&| 


;  a°  8.5  ett.     js 


c3  O 
c  o 


JO  ^ 

o  a> 
c  >, 


K   Ph 


A1906- 


-43 


LOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


-  -     ■     - 


J-  T   "  S  ~      -    ZZ 

r"  y'  ■-.       — 


B  r.       —  —  S        - 

3)   V     o       c  * 


3i '  —      :/: 

—      J _ 


-  = 


3        —    - 


—  i  -  r- 

~  =;  - 

~ ■  —  -r 

:-.  ..-.  X 


?i       — r~  -w 


8       I 


-■  — 
-    - 


r    - 


-  ■":       rz       —  v  -3       x       x. 

-  —      —      -.2  —  x      t-      — 

[ij      g      r_ "  •: "  — '      o      — " 


c-.  x  -z. 

—  J-  c 

—  —  — 

—  ■ 


- 


sc 


£ 

:-? 

■-. 

- 

- 

o 

— 

t~ 

- 

. 

= 

~ 

s. 

- 

= 

—         -     ,    I     Ih 


* «  "0        6  I 


—    "     - 
■  -.   ~  — 


i 


—        — 


—  S  — 


h«c  ;  - 

£  i-  y.  — 

o  -  «;  ■; 

='  -"  — '  •  -' 


—      - 


:- 


—  r-  r~       r-       re 

—  r  —       — 

- 


■    - 


3    *- 

-- 


-       2 

=      - 


.1  H 


POC      - 

:  —  — 
-  —  - 


: 


—  C:  -~        ~ 


"  ?£  ~J 

—  -£  -S  —  c  i  «5  — 
e  e  s  c 
n     i-i «  •j'- 

«*  ... 

cj 


X   *  C: 
—  M  TZ 


—       »'-  - 


—        =     "  ■  - 


-  r- 

-  T. 

n  a 


—  x  --  r. 

s  SS  = 

c .  d  —  — 

C' —  —  DO 


■    — 


i  »•:  a 


c- 


x  t~  -r 


-    -  --       = 
5  n  —       ^ 


5      - 


is 


-  z  z  - 


2       - 


w     .---c 


_'      a    i 


•igij 


:<oec    c    J: 


3 15 


r  H  —  -  ~  - 


■Z      t   c 


•-  s 
■S  s 


:    ■■-     s  c  - 


.  —  —  —        £_ 


z 


-  -  r     - 


IMPOSTS    OF    AGSICULTUKAL    PRODUCTS. 


675 


jl  s.  t-       r:       re 


iir-i 


c  —   — 

S  c       — 


»    I  2    Mf 


t-  a  X 
t  c.  to 

t  -  —  -r 

Cr:  oc  ic 

bot4VT 


CM        00        !C 


n  c  g  r-  c  bo  oa  o  io 

o  ^r  ^r  ^  3a  MVO^ 

O  C".  *  ~l  r:  C  r:  T  r 
-o  —  :  -  ?  i  :  ■  '-"  u-  r  i  x 
n  -h  T  s  35  *r       crj  "^ 


7J 


-  ■ 


II  i  ll 


•  —  ri  ao  n  —  ^  ^ 

•  i-  co  (c  --nciH 

■  ■:  -  IN  i-l  CO  C3        — 


-i  r.  ::  I-  :i  r  r-  --  t» 
?  j  X  X  ?  I  :r  ao  ^-*  m  00 
:•:  :i^  OO  O  O  O  — 

t-Tn^cTt-  ■■:  •?  «  m  f 
~  •  ~  tr  —  ~  t-'C  t-  ?i 

Q01—  CQ~S  O*  CO         C^O 


i^«100DdDI 


■  r :  -  -   _:  sa 


^r*r~.  z:  y:  v.  —  71  ~ 
■  cc  «a  t  — -  «2  o 


•1>  oo  xr:»tt- 
•  ro  o  >-*  c  ac  ^r  xi 

■  yf  — Trf  — To* 


E<0  C4  i-H  t-~  CO 


\~ 


CO    M  CM        M    I   *-l 


- 


so  c: 

oVet 


o  -r  — -r-— '  o  x  'j-  -q- 

l-    T   L~   — i    N   X   — i  ^-   '.3 

*—  o  «h  —  r-i  i-  r-i  x  x 

X  t-  r "C  f—  i- 

»ot^^rt^c:x      ^*  cc 


x 


~> 


::  eg 


:  <0 


»  CO  C*  « 

O  »--  -si*  ~-  f—  —  r- 

CM  «  —i  74  —  X  O 

ocT— 4*r*  ■"t'efl'eo  •© 

t-  x  x  77.  r~  re  — 

rT— reTcM*«o      — " 

rr  ri  -^  wa  o 


77  —  so 

S7MT~ 
X  77; 

—  7r=~ 

t-  -r  x 

rir:  ro 

=C—  — 


I  OQ        CM    !'  CM     I  17» 


«C  Tf"         OS 


:-  >-  rt  77  T~  -r  r-  r-^  X 


)  oa  77  >  t-  re  x 
.  .  .  .  ;  o  -y  r^  r~  X 

-  x  t~-  re  ;tj  o  te  o 

rVoV-r'r  cc 
-  x  n  x  'r  *  i.~ 


t-  00 

S3 


—  —  ,r  x  o 

— i  r:  r  t  o 


. .  .  - i-  N  7i  r- 
?:  -  r  n  tj.  n  j) 
—  ©O  I>  L~  to 


c  — 
3a  — 

X   CO 

-T  — 
7-1   - 


:5«  = 

.    -:    •_ 

^-^   a 

E 


■ga 


B  S 
S3  5 


i& 


S  o  o. 

Sffl 

5 


H     5     tH 


c    • 
o  o 

=  — 

.  o 

"5  &• 

-'  -I 


"2  c  6  6  6  6  6 

~  —  —  —  —  -r-c 


§«S»BS 


8 iSiSI Sail 


676 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


•  ~ll~         CI 


r     -    - 
-r  711- 

a  —  \z 
s_  ~  -' 


T.  X 
: 

=  - 

;  ■ 


82 

DG  DC 


—  S.     - 

■G  r.  :/: 
X*  r*  C  J 


- 

a 

-     | 

- 
I 


> 


§ 

9 


:  x  =:  — 


-     5        = 


-        -        -        = 


—     --   y 

=  —--.-        --. 

—  6  /.  ~  -.      / 

x  —  —  .     r 


| 


x  - 


~   ~   Y-   —  •--. 

-  —    s.     -    X 


c 


-.    » 


x  — 


-XiCfC  — 


-  X  - 

-  — 

T  -  C 

: '  — '.  r  i 


: 


5 


X        —  —  : 


- K  —       r. 


x  i-  r-  t» 

-I-  O  ^"-  i- 
X  c  c 

-  "  --'  r 


M      ~   -  -   :    '-       ,- 


:    r 
■-       C        b  C 


g  -  ■ 
2c.I »  >> 


. '  --  if  fe      =  — 


IMPORTS    OF    AGRICULTURAL   PRODUCTS. 


677 


'£>  ho: 


Oco 
10CN~ 


UOCM 

co  r~ 
of  io" 


:  co  -<r 
.  CO  ^r 


00  t~- 

on 

co  co 
co  o 

of  of 


^  co 

C. '-O 
Oi-H 


T  03  00  Ol 

rr  aoco  t 

cri"— i  of  co 
tnnm 


»o 

CO  'O 
00  CI 


h-  00  CD  ^r 

CO  O  O  H 
WCJHiO 


CO  *0 
COT 

coin" 
—  ^ 
0:01 


wo 


CO  h- 

CO  CO 

co  ccT 
T  ■T 

rt  00 


CO  00 

'--  ~ 

"O-H 


^•3 

O  00 


I  "3 


o  c 
.e  3 
o  o 


cu     .       J^         cp 


1  O-s 


E*> 


H     H     H 


cs  e.cs  <s  a/ 


SS5 


678 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT   OF    AGRICULTURE. 


«<os 

0       o 

5         L 

5      oo      on 

I 

CO 

BQ 

cr.            co  0       0 

3              00      1 

fy^ 

CO 

. 

on: 

:        i 

" 

3         I 

0*  00 

00 

3 

CM  C-l         ^ 

r                 1-       co  0 

:                            CO           r-c  0 

at 

_3 

•CSOOf 

r         5 

1 

3         CI    1     COCO 

■V 

t^- 

-  1 

■<*                 -^T  O         C 

10 

co  o- 

■J 

H             0 

3    [ 

:■       h  I  «  co 

s 

0 

-1 

O               CO  T         0 

CO               t~  — 1         0 

5)     S?^ 

■^f 

3 

"OmC 

- 

3         0 

D         L 

■V 

to 

s 

00                     CO        t 

-                CO      t~  -^ 

•7; 

> 

Cm"h"c; 

$     z 

C 

r  i  (N      ih 

« 

« 

CO 

S                                           CMrH 

1 

o 
o 

| 

OS 

■— io 

0 

4^ 

O 

IO         -^iO 

tA 

co  co 

•  X 

- • 

e 

■^< 

C         CO  CO 

1-^ 

•  CO 

0 

CM 

O         COrr 

CM 

+j 

1  -*  00 

! 

3J 

co" 

01 

1  - 

cT 

•                     CO        10"  iC 

oT 

-^ 

.              W3 

CM         COCO 

oa 

T 

^ 

0 

CO       >o  0 

3 

cic-i 

oo 

25 

CO 

CM        COO 

031 

C 

i 

»o 

0 

•£ 

C)  CI 

CO  c 

1      ' 

- 

: 

3             i-> 

ro 

t- 

CO 

1 

3             l>-  (N        C 

li                          y-*           r-  U3 

t_ 

c 

1       c 

3         T 

-              CD 

cr. 

co 

■0 

c 

1             ^:  : 

cj 

cor 

r>      c* 

3        I 

C 

3               M" 

o 

00 

S 

I 

3           —  cr- 

:                n      iooo 

_r 

a~o- 

7 

[        T 

5  ■  K2, 0 

CO 

0 

■l               00  GO        t- 

;               1-      oh 
3               -r      co  ro 
r              co      cr.  i— 

oS 

3 

en 

z 

3               —  CO         t 

HC 

3         f 

:      cc 

3                ^i-H 

O 

Ci 

O 

COrt         r 

0 

lO 

o 

Oi 

£* 

ci"c: 

CO 

?     a 

!     c 

r   c 

"               rH* 

~ 

ci 

co"      C> 

:'                        -^h*  rt 

»>•" 

N 

j  : 

- 

g 

O 

z. 

•0 

:     as 

■h      f,g 

CO         CCCO 

00 

X 

CO 

U3 

5 

10 

«Q 

*» 

co" 

; 

■*" 

«T 

uo" 

:i 

•                   CO" 

tt"     co"*o" 

C  i 

"-^> 

*"-CI 

<2 

o 

/ 

03 

•                     C33         ^H  ~- 

a 

cS 
3 

o^cn 

»o 

co" 

— 

co" 

CO" 

CM 

<n"      o-'vo" 

'- 
n" 

■^ 

CO 

O 

H  d 

rf 

: 

Of 

>      i~- 

a 

ic 

iO 

CO 

IN 

D 

c 

•«*<  >^ 

5     0 

CO          H  t~ 

X         ICIDO 

<                CO       0  »o 

0 

3 

CI  c 
cot- 

>           CN 

- 

i 

c 

T-H 

CO 

CO 

s 

— 

c 
0 

CM  ^3 
>               CMC 

a 

e  1 

0 

cj*oc 

BC 

a 

IC 

cs" 

-r 

co" 

« 

r-J  -C 

r- 

"             06'     oCcjT 

tsl 

3 

c 

c 

0 

eo 

O 

r 

OOf 

/ 

00     as 

CI 

> 

c 

W 

oo 

0 

a 

MC 

5       tt 

1                          CI           O  T 

0O 

t- 

f 

c 

T-1 

•-* 

rt 

CO 

c 

c 

c't  ~ 

co" 

o 

o 

<- 

^ 

ta 

IN 

0 

O         CO  CD 

CI 

>-l 

>» 

3 

o 

»o 

CD 

»- 

CM 

O         COO 
CO         H  00 

=2 
>o 

.t2 

co" 

CO" 

co" 

00" 

__' 

co" 

00"     10"  *o" 

oT 

t^ 

CI 

a 

CI 

03        t— 1  H^ 

8s 

3 

3 

^rt 

»o 

IO 

CO 
CO 

CN 

T)<" 

CM 

■«C«         ON 

t-T     con 

■0 
n" 

l^ 

ift 

CO 

00  c\ 

C 

' 

O 

00 

0 

CO 

■^  w 

0 

CO         1— 1  00 

CI 

g 

o 

CO 

c" 

CI  ^c 

r* 

TT-          C)  T-~ 

£ 

en 

C) 

CN 

•* 

c 

©c 

c 

O         CM  I- 

s 

3 

•g-o~c 

X 

c- 

gs 

eg 

-" 

^r- 

a 

•^"r-- 

■*"     cd"o" 

"3 
> 

-t 

?l 

co 

Sc 

? 

■^         C33C33 
"*         CM>0 

CO 

*h 

ti 

^o 

CO 

- 

E 

»-HCC 

oc 

:c 

«e 

C7 

,  e 

1- 

^ 

'", 

rt 

CO 

c. 

CN 

Cm"-h" 

^ 

o 

o 

CI 

CO 

- 

o 

'J" 

■* 

0 

•^        «3CM 

^^ 

00 

CO 

CM         N  03 

— 

>» 

<'. 

CO 

03 

(N 

0 

O        Oh 

■* 

CO 

t~ 

Z 

CO 

C33 

kO         CI  H 

CM 

CO 

»o 

CM 

O        CO  0 

ec 

3 

>~ 

CO 

:■: 

0 

CO         0O-* 

0 

c3 

3 

CO 

03 

cm"     i-Tcm" 

CO 

I- 

C33 

CC 

<NCN 

^ 

gs 

O 

rt 

rt 

CI 

o 

^ 

^ 

8 

CMC 

CM 

»o       *o  CO 

0 

~ 

o 

CI 

0O  N 

« 

O         CO  CM 

l~ 

a! 

CI 

"" 

LO 

C5 

(N 

f^ 

C33 

O! 

oc 

CI 

_3 

C«o 

■- 

CM 

00 

g~o 

CO 

O 

CD 

B3 

-^h  GC 

c 

03         CM  O 

s 

qQ 

CI 

<2? 

<5 

K 

g 

-^ 

CI  C) 

CO       *o  ^1 

E> 

lOO 

c; 

o 

^^C) 

io 

-.: 

10 

t^  »c 

- 

CO         t-S 

CM 

CI 

2 

,  HO 

6% 

o 

CM 

CO 

rt 

rt 

M 

:i 

C) 

CO 

ri 

n 

o> 

eo 

00 

-f 

l>- 

■H.         03-H 

>* 

30 

C33 

^3 

H            t^CO 

t^ 

>> 

r* 

00 

O           H"<H 

CM 

*-n3 

-r 

** 

.< 

»r- 

^H           CD* 

CI 

r? 

< 

■^         rj*  CO 

c  1 

3 
cS 

3 

~h" 

•fl 

o 

IO 

03 

■0 
I- 

-a> 

CO          OH 

h"     o">o" 

CO 

CO 

'- 

CO 

; 

: 

: 

■a 

CD 

o 

» 

"d 

CO 

a 

3 

1  3 

'    CO 

-go 

T3 
§ 

3 

6 

~3> 

m   CD" 

3  a 

-3 

n 
3 

u 

0) 

O 

fl 

O 

0 

0 

5 

ft 

j   ; 

9 

R* 

■3 

ft 

f\     '■ 

ft 

ft 

a 

L^ 

■d 

o 

cS 

a 

cj 

c 

cd 
u 
o 

ft 

o 

1 

K 

w 

ll 

o 

3 

'o 

■3 

X 

! 

0 

— 

C 

6 

o  o 

•3 

£ 

3 

0     . 

- 

5 

(4 

*o 

CJ     3 

H"  t-  , 
fto  5 

•a   '. 
a    • 

"3   ' 

a 
M 

a) 

QJ 

•a 

B 
o 

ta 

3 

C3 

cp 

0 

0 

S  : 

O          • 

03      ' 

Ik 

s 

3 
3 

M 

-< 

►4 
« 

H 
W 

S'go    oo 

3 

o 
EH 

o 

.sf 

o 

CD 
CJ 

03 
1 

3 

0 
— 

I 

O 

0 

03 

0 
O 

ft 

■:- 

O 

1    M   -1 

J«   CD   f-«    C 

■3  e  cu  3  •„ 
3  3  a.3  0 

?  3  ?P.:5 

■el 
O 
t-i 

E5 

W 

^3 

t-l 

a  p" 

j;  So 

fi 

,.&$ 

Eh 

n  0 

5 

K* 

03 
> 

5 

3 

s. 

-S 

o 

s 

« 

6 
CO 

CD 

CD 
CO 

O 

CDpJ 

ft 
CO 

IMPORTS    OF    AGRICULTURAL    PRODUCTS. 


679 


o  ^ 

C>  CO 
cTtT 


•-  CI W 
1--  I-  ~H 

TP  Cvi 


NO 
CO  -^ 

Oca 

1  -  w    - 

uaVf 


— I  CO  S_      _ 
CI  O  O  O 

CC  CO  X  CO 


~<  30  sc  co 


—  -o  ct> 

~  CO  CO 

oocfexT 
o  r-  ^ 

•<r  oc  cr. 


t^  O  v.'  CO 
NNON 


CO  ~H 

OS  -^ 


co~t*T 
ct  CO 
Cl-CF 


00  CO 
CO  00 

83 


■-i  o 

■*  en 


CO  CI 

cor-  - 
CO  t--  I 

r*Tco~ 


w  ci  ~* 

co  t  jo 

i-i  IN  iO 

Mho" 

r^i^co 
i-Tco 


CO  io  -v  --o 

CO  CO  ■*  O         t-h 


TP  1^ 
o  t^ 


-H  CO 
CO  CO 
Oi  C> 

-!j>"cf 


p.    ,23 


^3       "3       -3 


63     ,  &s( 
c  ca      ajK 


s-  O  ~  a3        * ' 
CO       COM       CO 


L-3 


a;  g 

53»'o 


c3  sj 

E-ig-i 


••  ftt,  s 

O  Ctj   CB   g 

O  hf]  <p 

CJ?-hC0 


=J  g 


6S0 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


S 

J 

S 


C 


EC 

- 

— 

c 

•0 

CN 

EC          1- 

C       ^r 

0     1 

—       r- 

■-        01 

3 

ec 

ic 

00       ": 

!~          L- 

O       : 

jc      e 

s   s 

l~       •* 

= 

^      =- 

> 

€^ 

r 

» 

2      "- 

C          TT 

•-       »--: 

-r       H 

0       l- 

00 

5 

OS 

.- 

00 

— 

a 

; 

1 

■o1  co 

M         t^ 

_      •» 

oc 

1^ 

x  a 

j:       e 

0       — 

6 

■* 

OC 

•->        ■■£ 

t-        CN 

oc 

r^ 

■V         -C 

cd 

r; 

t~     a 

CO        U5 

> 

0 

j: 

- 

L-         QC 

LO       oc 

ro 

l~.       2 

ED         CO 

•^         IQ 

■r>      r: 

CO         LO 

^i 

a 

a 

II 

A 

O 

>> 

c 
g 

5 

r- 

ce 

t~ 

■  - 

? 

cci-- 

£      R 

r~      -h 

«.- 

10 

5 

■  -.  :i 

•W           LO 

B 

oc 

CM 

*.  f. 

s5    n 

y-<         OC 

s 

co 

CO 

= 

s 

■—   — 

CO        X 

■V         -^ 

"3 
> 

•0 

r 

E 

TT  N 

CN         S 

l-O         CO 

CO        ,^- 

SI 

. 

r 

i- 

ccT     ce 

0      — 

5           CO 

0      -^ 

0 
- 

— 

I 

!! 

s 

S 

r^ 

r- 

.- 

CO-* 

_,       ^ 

t-           LO 

— 

'- 

1- 

•-  — 

—       a 

■V         CN 

0 

oc 

ro 

CO  r-l 

rt       c 

CO        CO 

^ 

-_■  r 

0      c* 

r~      c; 

oc 

CN         -^ 

r^      c; 

■  - 

r^      cn 

cc       —1 

> 

C* 

— 

r^       c 

r-       BO 

g 

CO        c 

■0      ■v 

] 

■^ 

M 

>> 

3 
& 

•-- 
10 

<- 

„ 

.- 

—  *. 

t~      a 

0      t^ 

= 

S- 

•  :  — 

0      « 

O         UO 

<» 

C 

CN 

r^^H 

■^        K 

CO           LO 

7 

T 

»-o  r-- 

a:       — 

^-           -^ 

"3 
> 

7 

•■' 

^T  -H 

EX         — 

CO         -V 

•^ 

■C 

- 

t^           CO 

0      l^ 

»5 

~; 

'" 

L-           -O 
CO         t^ 

CO         CN 

c-f       CO* 

■>5     5! 

cn 

0 

IQ 

g 

— 

— 

I 
r 
C? 

! 

| 

_ 

■ 

_L 

J. 

4. 

X 

c 

09 

> 

c 

a 

t- 

0 

Cv 

3 
a 

a 

i 

c 

1 
6 

1 

O 

IT 

c  y 

~  c 

D    ' 

1 

3 

0 

| 

t. 

fiB|3 

a 

0 

c 

g 

O 

4 
3 

3 

1 

K 

m 

■< 

s 

g 

B 

C 

0 

'3 

c 
1 

< 

1 

C 

C. 

c 

- 

z 
t 

c 

=  §  -  i 
oJ  Pi"3  C 

>-  c  >  c 

_  c_  p 

■S  -'  OS  c 

—  —  —  t- 

.S;  £  .S;  ° 

' 

K 

c 

K 

c 

-- 

txuilci 

-< 

■-) 

CD   - 

.i    - 

CS_C  C8  c 

e 
•< 

|| 

] 

c 

"r  ic"3  b 

—  ■c  — -5 

c     =  r  =  3 

3  ^^ 

-^  c  —  0 

w 

2  f 

c  —  0  - 

o^co 

0 

3  E    • 

r-       '— 

a  — 

ce 

> 

S"3£ 

> 

- 

> 

EXPOKTS    OF    AGRICULTURAL    PRODUCTS. 


681 


1 

O  CC 

—  C:  cr 

r 

X 

— 

re  a  a 

re 

a 

t^ 

o 

a 

X 

LO 

I-  a  X  re  a  a 

^        : 

hpicj 

ri 

x  a 

a  — 

ce  ce 

~  a  a  3  o  3 

■  - 

X 

a  .;  -^ 

ri 

3  oc  re 

l~  c 

XI 

1  i^a 

uero 

coo 

Ol 

r 

—  Q  i-  a  ■*  r- 

o 

- 

ei  a  ~. 

oott  ce 

re  a 

CM 

x  — 

M 

X  -"3« 

CO 

oc  re  3  x  3  --C 
o  &  re  a  ao  <n 

re 

1  cs 

CM  -^  X) 

>o 

rr   q  3 

^h  CM 

*3« 

a  — 

2S 

Ol 

'- 

a  a  x 

i^ 

o      ei 

CM  — 

CM 

CM 

> 

<M        xr 

a 

T»"  rt  l-H 

X 

XX 

T 

■»r 

- 

2 

M 

1 

ccm^o    • 

■z 

t C       1 

CO      '■ 

X  — i 

a 

r-     ■ 

>, 

eor*  cocooa 

n 

re  io    • 

i   ■ 

3  O0 

ce    • 

O) 

cm  —  o  —  3 

t~- 

in  -^     . 

re  -^r 

X 

00      • 

00 

C 

s 

~  a  3  r-  ei 

OCN      • 

CM      • 

«CM 

ce 

t-~    • 

CM 

X  *C  -r       -^r     . 

3 

•-T   —       • 

'-. 

t^a 

IO      • 

IC 

ce  >n     • 

~ 

CM 

r^ 

3 

: 

SiS  : 

1 

CO      ■ 

i 

o 

OC  CM  3  T  —  r^ 

—    -^ 

— i  t  -j; 

^ 

-3  t^3 

!O00 

-a> 

•<s>  r- 

CO  t^ 

t->-" 

^ 

•w  a  «-e  3  cm  a 

7"            ^ 

3t»- 

■f 

A  —  •-. 

C  3 

t^ 

re  3 

a  a 

—  •3 

3 

c  —  cm  t  re  "*r 

■m      r. 

r)ca 

a 

re  a  r-i 

X  o 

X 

.-  re 

CM  ""J" 

a  "^ 

3 

oc  3  ifl  i-  h-  »0 

55     5 

x  ■»>•  -3 

re       a 

a  *-e 

a^re 

ox 

C-NT/ 3 

ie  -r  —  3  3  cm 

■«r  x  »c 

—        :: 

CM 

r^  3 

X 

"3 

t^. 

■3  3—1 

us      M 

CM 

i~r~ 

3 

> 

Q       CO       — i 

* 

-1  —  CM 

•» 

re 

rH 

* 

o    ■ 

1 

1 

EC  —  CM  3  L0 

•C 

^■«<      ■ 

■^    ! 

CM 

CM      • 

CM 

>» 

O  a  CM  CM  3 

IT.  Tf  tf  X  - 

i 

00  CM      • 

x    • 

rr  a 

O 

O      • 
CM      ■ 

t^ 

'-3 

r^T  "^  *o  oc 

>- 

— -«•    . 

■  e 

cm  re 

■<ji      . 

X 

-T?3         3 

X 

r^  re    • 

t^    • 

l^M 

a 

CM      • 

O                  N 

3  — 

•f 

X      • 

n 

3 

3  3 

ri 

CM 

o 

y 

rf  c  Q  — ■  -^  a 

"5 

i.e 

■^  a-^ 

c- 

/:  r-  lc 

TJ-   — 

ue 

-h  r- 

noo 

r*xx 

r^ 

a  oc  C  r-  Q  r 

r^ 

— 

x  re  a 

3  a  re 

^-  t^ 

X 

CM  C 

X 

'- 

—  CM  I~ 

?j 

"■T  CM  c 

Xrt 

a 

"-OCO 

IO  X 

r*  o 

3 

tc  re  *  oi  -r  — 

urT 

ccrji- 

3  IO  "3 

x" 

3  X  W 

3  r^ 

!- 

x  a 

Xrt 

^^  •* 

C3 

>o  uo  OC  — '  uO  — ' 

r^ 

a  cm  >-e 

ceco 

<e  3 

o 

"3 

CM       ri  -«>  3  — i 

t^^<  re 

«5 

ro       rl 

CM 

CM 

> 

C?T      CO       rH 

■o1 

rtCM'rf' 

■  e 

» 

ro- 

'I* 

c 

«j 

a  >o  — ■  x  re 
O  xx  o  tfS  *h 

t  re  o  3  re 

*J-CM 

ei 

a  o 

s 

t^ 

>> 

§ 

CM  1^ 

0C  —1 

5 

re  i-e 

T-t   t^ 

X 
X 

3 

cs 

c 

re  3  CM  re  — 

•e 

r~  Le 

3 

j^  a 

3> 

3 

a      t       c 

ue 

t^ 

CM  — • 

■e 

>a                re 

t^re 

r- 

CM  re 

>-ei 

3 

S3 

3  re 

CM 

§ 

r-1  CM 

.„^,»  , 

1  w 

r- 

t^  a  3 

tN 

-^  x  t^ 

XX 

\<o 

^   = 

!--»*: 

LOCO 

a 

re  ei  ~~  ei  3  a 

a 

re 

CM  CM  CM 

X 

i-  3   '- 

3  _* 

s 

3  e 

3)  CO 

c.  <r.  —  i-  x  ■- 

re 

re  cm  3 

« 

ue^-  c^ 

a  x 

t>. 

t^CM 

xm 

CO  i-H 

o 

3 

oe'e  of  — Tr^cr 

"         -H 

_• 

vd- 

u: 

■  e'  x — 

a-i 

_■■ 

rd"cp 

re? 

o"cc 

*v 

xt*  tt1  ue  p  i  3  t 

X 

M 

3  o  o 

3  CM  a 

t^ 

ei  t  — 

^  t^ 

>e  3 

a 

CM  •— 

"3 

x      Haori 

t>. 

re       — 

CM 

> 

g»     eo     —f 

Ol 

rt  CM 

t 

of 

•^ 

re 

o 

6fe 

a 

OC  —  t^f  — ' 

3  Xi 

a 

82 

a 

^< 

a 

>> 

t*  KC"'- 

"3  t~ 

X 

CD 

.—  c  o  m  a 

X 

TO 

CO 

— 

cm  f  -■?•  ^r  3 

c 

1          3  t^ 

r» 

a  x 

OC 

a 

o      re      i~ 

t~ 

a  x 

CO 

3 

-T                           i-H 

x  a 

o 

rt  m 

ue 

3 
- 

|       cood 

rt 

cm" 

of 

oi  c  —  x  o  x 

■^ 

^ 

I       a  w^ 

c 

a  o  3 

a  a 

X 

COCN 

3  r- 

uer> 

■*** 

5 

3  a  3 

t^ 

[  ~  3  '" 

10  3 

CN 

X  »- 

CM  cr 

«  «  o  ?i  c  i- 

o 

1       -^  i-e  u- 

r- 

3  r~  t^ 

r^re 

T  ^ 

6 

NXCCM'c'e 

^h" 

ueTi-ec 

T? 

x'  tt  a 

aco' 

re" 

Si 

re 

o"c 

o 

c  x  ■*  a  *r  c 

t^ 

re 

1      x  -^  r- 

— 

ri  —  r- 

i- 

e-i 

- 

a      o  S  o>  c 

X 

00  t^^T 

0         Cv 

C^  r- 

> 

a      c"  N  -T 
ei      -h 

C~fcM^ 

r^ 

of 

oi 

« 

a 

:>> 

•»  «  C  i  o 
oc  ^  n  x  ei 

cc  r;  c  c  t> 

>' 

av 

3  X 

O 
a 

•-o 

"3 

CmI 

CO 

r^ 

r 

a 

T  CM 

r~ 

CD 

'-3 

cn  oc  re  h-  x 

ie 

CM  re 

r^ 

-h  re 

-r 

t^- 

fi 

a      cml: 

n 

3  3 

X  CM 

3 

o 

ce>      rt      re 

3  CM 

C 

Ci 

c3 

3 

3~r^" 

cm" 

^f 

C3> 

0? 

rt  CM 

3 

'  fc. 

:  -  : 

t-'    •    •    ■    ' 

CC 

c     .    .    .     . 

.r:  c  c  o  o 

"j; 

c'  d 

;       C 

•       "5c 

O 

d 

C 

!        -3 

;.c 

i-H  : 

S-0 

3 

trt 

E 
o 

— 

:    o 

:        3-c 

o 

:        ft 

T 

T 

;  o 

•  c  • 

•  a    ■ 

C 

c 

:  c 

:.c  : 

OS 

.  03 

d 

«         : 

.               c 
■              w"  w 

■•  C  d 

:       o  °„ 
!      "O      B 

;            ©    r^  * 

:  - 

.  o  . 
■  J3     • 

r 

a 
<: 

:  c. 

'- 
o 
ft 

X 

i 

3      : 
0      '• 

;  ° 

!  ® 

;  O    ; 

•  s  • 

O 

< 
i    J    ii  : 
"1®  ■ 

u  »z2    * 

',J4    '• 

3 

Em 
< 

=  5^ 

: 
1 

5      ■ 

3 

-    "3 
5      o 

5 

_3 

p  c 

r*-r2 
■3 

c 

3 

- 

r 

i 
> 

t 

1 
)l 

3   ! 

Si 

:    "3f 

.3  c 
-   r; 

1 

C 

i 

:     c  o  -tr 
:     §^  = 

o    _    J  ° 

is  a* 

2    4s 

:  ^5 

I  S"ft 

-  i  ii 

50     P 

i|i 

i2  ft 

<; 

V- 

a 

u. 

- 

C 

5     Pi 

682 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT  ICULTURE. 


-  ;       3b  ■  * 


•_■    —  —         J         t; 


c 


r 


-=- 


-7 

t- 

: 

r 

- 

■ 

^ 

- 

- 

~ 

— 

-  -      - 

-  -        '        -       - 
r-  -r        —        •--        — 


2  1      :. 


:    —  -'. 


S5* 


= 


—  —  — 
S.  X  S 


■  i 


o  I 

-" 


!> 


- 

— 

;; 

- 

-- 

~ 

:- 

r- 

- 

-    ----    - 


= 

:- 


' 


z  -.  z       z       z       z 

—  —  —      —     —      — 


:    -  -  3     a      = 


EXPORTS    OF    AGRICULTURAL    PRODUCTS. 


683 


tc  cr: 

DO  Cl"  —  BO 

re  r-  —  re 

C:  *-e  t^  O 

—  cf  "*ci 


•  Tl   X 


M  '-  t- 

rr  t-  re 
—  5  k: 

X  X*  30 

rr.  *-C  re 

ci  -j:  r: 


—  zrc  ci  h- 


co 


—  "T  l-  -^ 
t~-cs  30  -<r 

n*o  00  Si  _ 

TP  ■»■  —  S 

CN  o 


;t^  « 


oo      o   o 


re       i-e    *y 


—  ■- 
~  —. 


re  — i 
CI  o 

-r  — " 


*r  r-  ci  re 

t-  -.;  —  — 

JO  il  CO  OO 

MsTe^i-Tci 

So  o  o 

c;  roc5 


co      oo   o 


»-t         »     M 


eg  x  55 

DOfitQ 


5^*    s 


i>  5  -.;  — 

—  —  ei 


CO  CO 

C  OS 
~-  :: 


r.  oa 

=:  — 
r.  x 


-.r;  «  x  -:  o 
r-  o  —  o  -^ 
t—  "T*  ^  ro  •— < 


■^  ~  — 

i-  —  CI 

:  -  :  ■ 


■*  sa  'C 
—  .c  re 
t-  c.  uc 

t^-r  — T 

Cl  irr  S3 

oe  ci  rl 


NTN3 


—  i-e  t  -cr 

~  —  Cl  Cl 


—  DO 

—  ^ 

■-T."  C 


K  O  -  M  N 
X  X  Ci  ^r  -^ 
■o  ce  ie  o>  — 

—  «3  s>  <2  otf 
c  c;  j:  :/  — 

CM  *  =C  O 

-ci.- 


CJ  ■ 


•  —  —  re  re 

■  I  ri  I  r~ 


ce  ce  t  "^  rr. 
ci  x  ■--.— 
c  i  so"  J  30 

■-I         ^  Cl 


cjovj  - 

-  =  :t  > 
o  o  2—  - 


2      I 
2     1 

--  a 


3 

3  "3 

al  -  <  "3 

SI  ta  »  « 

,£  *  8  g  ° 

Ȥ  1  3  8 


=  a 

•  0 

a3 


w   -r   •"   - 


fs& 


o-?   - 


«  =  _r_    -  -        — 


:jj 


Sort 


h      rj 

2  w 


o  g 
c3  C 


684 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


*-        2 


t*  r- 

— .   II  l> 

C  t> 

ueoo 

W 

C  ^  O      -x 

1           ce  -its 

00  o 

o 

©  r^ 

oo  -<t 

re       :ic 

oc  -^  r  -  co 

X 

£  x  — 

- 

ei  ^  re 

©  ■<* 

©x 

r 

r—  o- 

©CO  X  CI 

'- 

ce  t^  re    i  re 

OCNw 

oir 

OC 

cix 

| 

^t^ 

CiCKN 

i-e 

re  t^TcT  [  re 

»e  —  re 

tp  ^ 

X 

— -  © 

oSr-1 

5 

—  :' 

©  1-0  T  W 

i~ 

—  t^  -^ 

3 

cr.  ©  r~ 

OC 

t- 

c">  ©' 

r. 
> 

■^ 

00            o 

c 

OCOC  !£ 

1  ^ 

so  15 

our 

■« 

©         o 

3 

co      o      >r 

OO 

<N 

^c 

s 

c-. 

CS 

r- 

o 

r~ 

©"—  Cl  re 

C   V 

1^  ©o 

K 

X 

>> 

co 

o  Cl  re  »e 

-r  — 

©  —  t^ 

■r 

0 

ie«MM 

©IT 

-^  —  C) 

CN 

CO 

' 

+2 

a 

CO 

X  ©  T  — 

r~cs 

"T  ©  © 

C£ 

s 

t^ 

co«  — ix 

—  ■- 

-<T  CI  CN 

00 

t          © 

lO   L- 

CO 

o 

3 
0? 

-"J* 

Cl             lo 

ro 

r~ 

O 

- 

© 

■»  C  X  — • 

re 

CD  -^OC 

OC 

■-s*  o  ^^ 

OC 

r- 

C)  UO 

- 

xtNrrc 

^ 

*<ric- 

tc 

—  ©  i-e 

^j-  r> 

t  ce 

o 

~ 

-r 

OlOOH 

0C  -J  — 

re 

Cl  ?«  CI 

wC 

©  © 

3 

7 

re  -~ 

©  Q  •**  CI 
©  S  I-  © 

C  «•« 

OC 

ce  -v  © 

OX 

-r 

X  CO 

cr   c 

'- 

ci  e 

3 

-V  —  c 

•^ 

x  ©  © 

CN  t- 

C 

"3 

.- 

^~ 

'          o           o 

C  C5C 

tN 

"^  r~ 

xc 

— 

^  © 

> 

€f 

t-             00 

EC 

CO         t> 

■^ 

tN 

CO 

CN 

LO 

!    O 
© 

O  i-H  WCO 

re  — 

©  ©  i-e 

•  c 

"J 

r-©  t^  — 

Ti  — 

OCJ 

: 

X 

cici©  X 

£  ~ 

?l 

' 

c 

©  ©  -^  -^ 

--T  -; 

rcN  -^ 

t> 

© 

e 

"  ci  ei  © 

i-   J" 

X  •O'C) 

i- 

X 

CO               00 

X    -T 

x 

Cl 

3 

<N             O 

X 

■9» 

r- 

© 

0-***  re  ue 

- 

t^  i^  »r 

~ 

LeciN 

O  u- 

«> 

^-TJ. 

1   « 

-r 

nttu:l- 

- 

(MO  « 

c 

o  co  t^ 

S5 

a 

r~  ^r 

o 

t- 

© 

«  c-.  M  — 

<S 

: 

re  c  re 

CO 

xco 

3 

*   1   — 

~i  - 

^          ^^  -^-  ei  -j: 

IT 

m-+e- 

i- 

ce  ic  ci 

©  ir 

£ 

C  CJ 

1   © 

M  : 

eiTrre-a- 

-r 

r^-y:  ir- 

7 

©  t^x 

©  X 

©  c 

i^  ce 

"3 

'         <o          ■* 

-T  OC-fl 

-r. 

X  t^ 

© 

^  © 

> 

oo          c; 

-_; 

■"0"         OC 

ce 

oo 

TJ1 

1            ~' 

o 

- 

00  ■»  1^00 

3   3 

"^-  ©  ^r 

c* 

O 

>> 

2S^g 

—  a 

X  —  X 

X 

3. 

I-  - 

t^  —  "f 

3 

' 

o3 

g»rfg 

X   X 

©  ©  X 

j       ^2~'1 

c 

© 

o. 

x   - 

c 

ri 

»o            CI 

[-  ■- 

B 

> 

^* 

^ 

M          t^ 

re 

t^ 

^c 

X 

00 

i-e  ei  a  c-i 

z 

OC  CM  — 

~ 

x  ©i-e 

r»a 

IT 

re  o 

X  X 

^H 

c  o  t^C-l 

3 

CN  00  — 

Mri^p 

r^  t) 

C 

o3 

l> 

o  oo  re  ce 

t~o  - 

c 

CO©  Cl 

t^.c 

C 

co  S 

3 

«     a 

'-.  - 

s            b-  O  —  "^ 

a 

c=  t^e 

o 

i-e  t^  co 

©c 

rr 

■<»<  o 

e  e 

e 

^HMSCOiH 

O  t^»  T 

o 

©  T  X 

t^c 

c 

CO  Ti 

"3 

-     c 

^ 

OO            o 

r 

r^ 

©  CO 

t~a 

CC 

i-l  t^ 

> 

■>3<               OC 

^n          [^ 

c 

o 

•^ 

CJ 

re 

3 

oce^e-i  t^ 

a  a 

—  ^_ 

L- 

3 

>> 

O  CI  N  X 

t.  •; 

1^©  — 

3 

■^  rs  c;  t^ 

t~X  CI 

C 

O 

s 

n 

e" 

■■£  CC  ie  or 

—  s 

LO   ©   X 

CC 

© 

c««s 

©  TCO 

-.z 

ce          re 

NIT 

© 

w 

X 

o3 

3 

<M               00 

CO 

■e 

"3 

5 

Is 

■«•  ■«"  -^  oc 

<N 

oo  t^.  y 

X 

NVO 

O"0 

© 

©  Cl 

cniow 

■X 

82S 

c- 

CI  X  © 

S3 

— 

r^  co 

© 

s 

© 

—  oo  re  oj 

>C 

■c 

re  re  t^ 

© 

ce  -*• 

3 

>       K 

1  ■«■  ,- 

^          c^"-e-<j>  — 

« 

tt  re  c 

c 

X  CI  © 

Sg 

OC 

ce  o 

.3 

X 

e 

COfK 

5 

r^r~x 

a 

ci  re 

cS 

c 

^ 

cs           *<r 

r^ 

re  ©  e 

u: 

©  ■* 

t^  t> 

■«» 

—  X 

> 

■h<           t^ 

COrHUq 

3 

CO 

CO 

a 

1 

** 

>> 

^  re  t-  y. 

is 

^r  in  "^* 
— ic4  o 

-r 

IN 

c;  c-i  re  r~ 

tt  r- 

X  X  o 

o 

' 

C 
03 

»rr  re  oo  r~- 

x'i 

ci  r-co 

x 

X 

2 

re  «^f~ 

l'  CO  CO 

X 

1 

o          « 

ro-^ 

© 

t- 

3 

C4            o 

i-O 

tc 

-r 

1  J 

J  :  :m: 

K 

1^ 

V- 

H 

fc£3 

f  o  d  g 

~  0 

^i 

« 

© 

•o 

C  3 

ffi . 0 

3 

^ 

3 

a 

■3  3 
33  <7 

5 

■3  — 
■  03 

:  to 

■5" 

C 
03 

v~ 

=: 
cc 

"3 

S  : 
tb  : 

E 
f 

1 

be 

S 

3 

a 

< 

1 

< 

a 

O 

T 

1* 

o 

o 

e 

03  m 

C 
— 

.5  -: 
c  : 

03     • 
o    • 

i 

u 

c 

c 

.= 
CO 

"3 

B 

n 

03 
CD 

•^  tj 
■C  3 

5^ 

a 

i 

P 
) 

J 

3 

■< 
a 

w 

-) 
pa 

■< 

03 

*?    O 

O    =    c3 

03 
03 

e 

c 

c 

I 

S 

o  c 
^  c 

u 
r 

■5.S 

S3 
c  c 
cc 

3  3 

"3 

c 

9 

— 

s 

a 

"3 

o 

3 

3  co 
03   Q> 

^■§) 

K  3 
i-sCQ 

M 

off 
o 

m 

© 

— 

c 

02  «  ? 
SWtn 

03 
CO 

63 

C.iCS 

g  03  S  H  & 

O^1 

^ 

O 

♦a  03 

03 

o 

£a 

£ 

o 

EXPORTS    OF    AGRICULTURAL    PRODUCTS. 


685 


r-  X 

■—     - 

"<!»CC 
CD(C 


?i  •_;  x  x      ■- 


:-  n  ri  -.  =:  t-  r-7.  '^  -r 

:-  x  —  5  ■»  -. -.;  r-  — .  ■-. 

— -r  o'cTcT— cf^f  i-"  re 

iOJN "-  —  o  n  — 

t~  O  re ^  t  re  r~  ■* 


—       —        -l 


c  x 
-/  ~ 


05  — 
c:  C 

ass 

—  EC 
55 


—  c-.  -r  x  a  r-      — 
:::a:  —  ic  —       — 

M  —  X   — .  CC  ifl         © 


x      ?i;       x 


I" 


:  —  l-  re  ej  c. 


—  cd  CO  -^  i-~  re  x 

ci  c.  —  n  iQ  i-  — 

i~  <c  r—  re  re  cr:  t- 

^       f-T^r^'»  I   OC 

r-t         ^i  -"T         CC  ~* 


sea     ir- 
is-    -*      r-      ■» 

be      —      •-=: 


•r M  —  — .       X 


-  o  S  ^  ~ 


-  rr.  -r  re  n      ■-: 


~.  r>l  "T- 

rr.  r-  •-. 

■^  M  X 

—  ~r  e> 


rr.  2 
x  x 


r~  r>  —  rr. 


:  =  MCfiC 


O  10 
n  — 
X  1C 

— ";rr:" 

x  — . 


CN 


-g 


M  Ifl  VT 

-;  £  x 

-i  iz  £ 

x~— ^e~ 
—  =  = 
c  re  ei 

cf  x"  r^ 


X  — 

X  t— 


t~  »  »-e  ~r  x  rr. 

MC--C- 

-;  =  —  t 


ri  x 

DO  N 


_ 


x  r -.r  -c  -;  —  X  — 


-  L-  —      f. 

?  l"  — "  ut*        — 

—  X  — 

a  ei  ri 


:n  II 


■  m  M  —  =       re 


x      ^ 

l>  -r 
i-i       iS 


^x-t= 


X 


C:  t 1 

ti  r.  x 

--1C 

to  <d  e> 


12  ? 


—  -.  N  x  t--<r  |  ~< 
~  r-"~re"c-i  —      oo  I 

tl  —  CO  —  c«  X  I   C£    I 

x    "•■cfio^r    tC 


—  o       ^ 
x'cf       X* 


x  "-'  —  X 

B  o  x"  c" 
e-»  c;  r^  c^l  - 


?>  -.z  o 

M  —  l- 
■T  7»>  C 
-  -r  — r  CO 


oc  e-i 
goto 

-  M 

raef 


re  r^  r^  X  —  ri 

O  — ■  r  -  re  —  n 


i~  r~-  •*:  yz  — ■  t-e 
~  "^  X  t--  x  r~ 


c:  — 

•c  — 

0<0 

^*  — 


X  iri  r»  *  rc  m      c; 


t  OS  -^  —  r^  -^ 
t^  r~  —  r;  ~  x 


~      c 


-  t£ 

8- 


-      ^    • 
c,  - 

"3  c 

•c-c 
c  c 
c  c 


—    BJ    •_    - 


■  x  x  c 
'.2.2  a 


g^2 

-  «s  - 


§■2      O 


c  a  oo 


I      = 

c       c 


=  ■- 
„    I    CS  =  C  =3  >.c 


c  - 


6S6 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


C 


X 


i-  IG 

-    ■ 

■^  =c  r.  r- 

r- 

§ 

p 

-   - 

ce 

-e 

—  K 

^    X 

r^ 

X   30         —  '" 

~  si  -    ^ 

:-  zz  ZZ  s 

o 

X  re  > 

- 
x  *-e  r- 

— 
O 

d 

' 

cscc       r--  X 

- 

X 

E 

c 

t~ 

—  E  •" 

re  x  — 

»e  r^ 

EC 

3C       »o 

ce  ei      —  S 

7t-r  :■  ~ 

i; 

■« 

c 

-  - 

ce      = 

-•  ee 

*o 

-^  —. :        — 

X 

:: 

—      i- 

'    - 

TT 

^- 

ei  ?t      — 
■x- 

—               3 

^ 

-e 

-  PC 

30 

. 

x 

re  :  r            —  -  - :  x 

r.  — 

i-e  *-e  ri 

-HtS. 

--. 

>• 

x  ei          r.  c  /.  t 

-  = 

_:  --  : 

:    - 

■* 

'-r  *-"            :-  Da  W  c 

—  9 

c:  -  CT 

-,Z  IG 

-     -     - 

' 

~ 

H  - 

e  s 

-^■•e  t>- 

DC   Z 

BC 

- 

—. 

S      oc 

x  c 

□a 

—  x 

i--  -         - 

c 

1    M 

= 

t^-"        K 

; 

a 

- 

r- 

n     — 

. 

~,  _      , 

-  - 

e- 

II  w           — 

x    e    - 

<«<  t^r^ 

te  ■- 

U  | 

x  ~.      r- 1- 

ic  S       -c  X 

:    -  -  —  * 

-r 

~ 

~ 

noc 

_:  —  --. 

—  c 

!>J 

c" 

- 1  r-  -r  — 

r~ 

* 

l^ 

-  - 

t^ 

a 

-i  ce       £  If 

r;?:r.  » 

e 

9 

« 

—   X    X 

ce  x'  ir. 

■3  - 

-co" 

CI  —         X  T 

_-] l~ 

:- 

t^ 

-r  ce 

* 

= 

r-  t-     •«"•?: 

—  -^r       ih 

X 

y 

C 

5^ 

C>       r- 

■ 

•^T 

> 

"  CS        rt 

1           1-lH           C 

- 

s 

X 

f-C^ 

•W 

- 

T 

= 

1 

r: 
r. 

~- 

~  x 

L-   t l- 

•- ! 

r*r-T* 

—  r- 

■V 

>. 

3a 

-r  c- 

IC  — 

l>    t-    -'- 

ce  D 

~ 

-e  cc 

! 

cc"ce 

ZZ    J 

— 

s 

!-*r. 

— '  ep  —  v; 

2    - 

' 

■r— "— '  — 

ccTa 

no 

- 

t-  X 

r~  t^      b 

—  c; 

- 

X 

c-»»- 

eo 

r 

ei      y. 

-o 

□r 

i-~. 

J 

i2"     g£ 

s  s  g  s 

e 

- 

— 

T? 

|    =    5 

— 

rj 

N  r-       r:  -^ 

_:  c  M  BE 

x 

■  - 

r- 

c 

i  -  [  — 

ct 

r 

—  rt  —  *t 

5 

r 

e 

- 

2 
ce 

x  e . ■  -^ 

(T>T,«5"^r 

- 

- 

CDC         —  — 

:r:  y:       o  r* 

gl^S 

5 

? 

■  e  - 

-re; 

--  — 

> 

©^    -. 

" 

N                 T-1 

—               X 

•-: 

r 

-^Cv 

EC 

:- 

' 

o 
- 

i 

— 

re 

15 

*r  r^  c:  c 

--.  1 

a  ■:  ■- 

o*c 

«a  : 

_"-;• 

r^  t^cr:  r; 

fat 

—  -- 

■t*» 

O  iC 

t^^-  —  -<r 

■  -  3 

*-e  —  D 

t-":  l- 

o 

' 

- 

£: 

£  5 

C:  -C  re  — 
—  ri       — 

B3 

t~  o  t- 
oci^-ire 

cocs 

s 

1-e  i-~      ~ 

r 

»-e      t^ 

c<-»- 

to 

ra 

c 

0? 

rtu-       i.-  — 

t  -  —  zr_  t- 

« 

cc 

■«*ro»- 

~  ■'.  rj 

t^C 

t~ 

or:      ox 

SSS5 

:- 

X. 

r.  x  tz 

r:   y 

— 

o 

— 

- 

-     —  T 

i.e  ei  v 

—  — 

-.; 

a 

--.  ■-       —  - 

n  — -  r .  -.; 

= 

c 

.- 

ee  coa 
—  ej  _ 

re*  — J  x 

r-f  r 

BO 

*r  io      c^»i; 

s.  re  —  c: 

- 

1 

c 

r 

CJ-L- 

O  r 

CS 

r: 

~:i      r:r 

re  x       t^ 

r 

— 

— 

x  r 

: .  : 

•»• 

i- 

ee    -        -. 

re      ^-1 

M 

-.: 

t^ 

:- 

X 

e 

r- 

IN 

~ 

■V  fc. 

^  lO  1—  "T 

II 

—  ■■ 

r~  r—  cr 

OE 

cs 

-. 

o  « 

C  X  c  /. 

■  -  - 

~ 

S  —  l> 

cc 

^e  — .  i-  -r 

r.  :- 

re  e 

^ 

*a 

r-. 

--  ■  - 

—  re  re  ^ 

S3 

O  X  ^ 

GR  — 

re 

n 

- 

t-  *I* 

'"•  v     — 

-  - 

-    ~ 

r* 

R 

~*r  s.        [~ 

r- 

—       r 

cs 

t-       0 

i> 

5- 

—        — 

l-  — •      ^r  — 

•:xr:r 

z 

£ 

■e 

a 

—  ei  r- 

r:rr 

CO 

• 

g  s    5  * 

-r  ~  ~  :^ 

s  :  .—  a 

:* 

cs 

=  e  i  >.- 

^-i- 

c  — 

r 

ci  —        fc-« 

^  t-  X  — 

-r 

r 

5 

x  c  r 
—  5  t- 

c  z.  e 

X  C 

CO 

^  c      ■-  c 

- 

E 

ri  re  e 

^ 

*  x      —  9 

c:  C        .; 

:e 

•^ 

_ 

■^J 

Uiif 

C-l        ^ 

"i  B 

CR 

ri      — 

X 

— 

c 

N^- 

- 

I- 

ei 

_ 

5 

g 

CO   u- 

II        ,-~, 



x  t 

x  --; 

*«• 

>. 

re  —  g  = 

X  ■' 

5'£i 

—  — 

e; 

— 

/:  :- 

TT     - 

oc 

^e 

— 

X 

K  s  ?.  r 

K    IE 

t-  -r-  iC 

—  .- 

E> 

- 

S—      L" 

»-*  — 

SCTg 

^<« 

-.r 

^ 

r   : 

—  1- 

E!i- 

tr- 

= 

a    '- 

C 

c- 

i-e      — 

H 

! 

•       ^ 

•  • 

_: 

m 

e 

E 

c 

||l 

llf  a 

1 

7t 

1 

|iJc 

d  c 

z 

= 

5  •- 

* 

-- 

s 

T 

'= 

c 

i 

3  — 

— 

~ 

■a 

■J 

( 

3 

3 

o 

1 

cs 

1 
o 

— 

a 

= 

-  v 

]__ 

•- 

B 

C 

■0 

o 

1 

- 

|] 

- 

CO 

2 

2. 
1 

» 
> 

E- 

< 

5 

1. 

1 

—  "r  = 

-   ;    e  -- 

_C 

© 

b 
S 

)     Lo 

— 

— 
- 

il 
y-  *™ 

a  ~ 

> 

5 

£ 

.i  — — 

"3 

o 

c- 

< 

s 

—  = 

C  —  C  i  -  rr 

• 
2 

< 

~ 

~ 

er 

".=  <     nix 

o 

a 

> 

Bo 

QJ 

5  > 

7 

z  a 

-  — 

-  £ 

*     '—  er 

£5 

§5 

o 

O 

— 

J 

H^ 

EXPORTS  OF  AGRICULTURAL  PRODUCTS. 


687 


O  II  to 

C^Tl 

<       CC 

wir 

<    1  c 

i    D 

c 

1            ^  (33           CC 

co  000 

tji    ||                !OOION 

oc 

22 

3       l- 

nn  iu 

W 

'- 

CM  if 

> 

TJI   O   ^H 

O    II                ON  CO  -o 

CO 

00    II 

3         t- 

CO  c 

1         IT 

c 

c 

03  OS         0C 

CO  i-H  W 

ir 

CM  COCO  C^ 

C  1 

1      II    00 

i-  a 

3        c£ 

co  if 

3        ^> 

1  - 

e 

•no      co 

•n  co  co 

CI  O0  O  TJ 

o 

00    II 

in  ii 

3         i- 

Cl  c 

i 

r~ 

t*-    TJI              r- 

Ol-    -T 

c 

3                     NNIO^T 

c 

1         r- 

CO 

n 

tx 

e 

CMl-T           TJ 

o  O  CO 

o 

3                        I-H  CO  1-1  0 

Cl 

,_*■ 

"■        ,- 

e 

' 

coo 

c 

"                        r^C""" 

>o 

5    1  m 

fflr 

1 

i-H  i— ( 

C 

I 

c 

co  cr. 

3 

CO 

CM  00  TJI 

Tl 

HO)!C 

■J 

3    i  as 

l-c 

I 

CSC 

1 

CO 

t    t^  CO 

c  oco 

a 

)                                   IO.HCD 

c 

5     1   -V 

in  t> 

in  if 

3 

a 

1                WlOts 

c 

5         Til 

oh 

a?  if 

3 

o 

OtJio 

CO  CO  CM 

1             TJI 

m 

mc 

CM  t- 

00 

Cr- 

oo 

CM  CO  i-H 

THG0CJ3 

ooooo 
tji  ^t  in 

c/ 

5 

CO  D3.-I 

<              oon« 
co'co 

TJI 

3 

a 

)      i- 

oc 

> 

oc 

!     >; 

~_ 

« 

K 

OXr» 

scifl'a 

Cl 

c 

o 

CO  fi 

~ 

— ITI 

• 

c- 

9 

CI  r^O 

coo  o  — 

c 

>      i> 

m  tv 

-, 

CM  t 

l       t: 

e 

c 

•n  .-I  oi 

9 

1                 C3  00  CO  c 

CO 

•         00 

oo 

C 

o~a 

"      ?j 

ir 

- 

^~-s~*         ! 

00r-^O~ 

CC 

oifii-oc 

c 

o 

wc 

— 

IOC- 

1       of 

c£ 

c 

l-cco 
CM  COO 

Cf.  C]  Cl  ci- 

CC 

C6 

a 

3         C 

CO 

c- 

C 

r 

T-'^ 

t> 

:                    OOHHr 

Cl 

'"" 

-' 

' 

1 

co"i~ 

C 

1                m~ 

T-l 

CO 

00 

f-c 

oc 

3 

i 

1 

i  -  -o  m 

J 

3                           NOW 

^h  y.  Sj 

r 

fc- 

cue 

OO  c 

3 

CM  OiCN 

-J 

t^ 

•     o 

ate 

" 

co  o< 
en  ir 

3 

r 

h  cnira 

ri  t  -  00 

CC 

I- 

OIIOH 

r               odinci" 

a 

Ej 

S 

£ 

Noa 

h 

oco  00 

tt 

CO  a 

00 

HOi^i 

If 

3                  T-l  mcM 

cm 

Tji\-*ocT 
o  o^i 

CM  O 

i           coi-T 
o 

i 

i-- 

r-c 

o- 

r~cc 

CO 

a- 

c 

CC 

1— 1  00  03 

ot 

3                     COOHr- 

IT 

ir 

to 

00  c 

— 

oc 

.: 

i 

s 

N'30O 

t> 

HiOPHf 

o 

<J 

TJI 

OTJ 

o  — 

o 

r. 

« 

OOH 

J               Ocir-Tj 

o 

l 

tt  a 

TJ 

nc 

CC 

- 

.    e 

fjiTi^in 

: 

ad  r-  r~  c 

CO 

c 

gj 

ooc 

if 

oc 

K 

s. 

r 

o  o 

c 

O  CO  o 

3 

a;— -  tt  a 

in 

J 

•^i 

3 

c 

.-^ — 

K 

I-l   T— 1    t^ 

c 

Ol-Hr- 

o 

1-1 

B 

CrTt-" 

o" 

cf 

CN 

o 

o- 

MC 

in  co  cm 

OOt^CM 

c 

IOC0  03 

c. 

tiic 

TJI    If. 

I 

IT-  tji  T-l 

TJI 

coc 

OC 

OOOtr 

O0  t-TJi 

£JC 

oc; 

TJI  O  00 

c 

Cl  coo 

M 

00  T 

coir 

C33 

£ 

T-l    TJI    CD 

OCO  00 

« 

Cl  —1  CO 

00 

00 

c 

Cl  OCO 

Tr"o"GO 

r-l  (M  CO 

ooo 

5 

co"oT 

CM 

OC 

rr 

°2£ 

c 

Ol  Tl 

o 

c 

loc 

oo  r^^i 

c 

CO  tji  o,o 

03 

CJ3 

woe 

1 

OO 

r^ 

c 

i- 

B 

OOIH 

r- 

C33TJI  ,-f  cr 

TJI 

o- 

O 

t~c 

t- 

occ 

tH 

- 

0 

B 

m  tji  c<i 

c 

TJI    Cl    T-l    t^ 

o 

c 

O 

in  c 

X 

OTt 

u: 

1- 

c^ 

"     | 

iffofi-T 

o 

NH0OC 

o* 

EC 

35 

C3  0C 

1  - 

03  0. 

fH 

f 

>.- 

a  c3 

asco^H 

S 

O  T-l  CS  CC 
TfN           t- 

TJI 

c 

CM 

CO 

T 

-        CN 

I>  o 

« 

C73 

W 

c-fr^" 

s 

in 

TT 

Co 

<M  r- 

OC> 

CM  CO  Oi 

Q 

IT3TSO 

F* 

s= 

mc 

CM  00  tji 

ff 

CO  03CO 

E 

l-TC 

CI  CO  T-l 

<r 

OCT.  CO 

oc 

(rT 

o"a 

00  if 

' 

cocfoo 

opefer 

00  TP  00 

Tl 

ou- 

I-- 

03CJ30 

c 

TJI   (- 

o 

O  CO  CO 

c 

NOt-I 

1-1 

ocTcTo" 

S5 

c 

r- 
-o 

coifrT 

CO 

r-T 

1 

c 

m 

a>cc 

- 

mc 

m 

e 

t~ 

rf 

O  C3CO 

ot 

ocor-c 

CM 

'• 

n 

I— Cl 

c 

tt  a 

e 

£ 

c 

-1- 

•n  o  co 

3 

1-  Ol  n  It 

m 

c 

CM 

z. 

coc 

Ss 

0 

CM 

°,(="~l 

CO  coo  c 

tn 

c 

CO 

oo- 

c 

t^o 

c 

c" 

Tjr-ToO 

c 

cjTcforic 

coctjco: 

o" 

a 

Off 

OTT 

o- 

a  a 

3 

t; 

in 

o 

c 

-f 

TJ1 

-       CO 

•-(  cm  in 

~ 

trffi            C 

o 

cf 

rH 

TJI 

cTc-^ 

r 

r-Tcf 

in 

-r 

TT 

in  a- 

Of 

ooo  in 

3 

00  00  o 

; 

o 

ci  a 

OL- 

C33TJI  t- 

Oi    TJI    T-l 

C" 

35 

O0C 

o;  d 

TT  Cl  00 

5 

CO  00t-H 

SC 

* 

oTc 

•fcooj 

c 

o'efef 

d 

Hf 

C-1  1- 

3 

OtP  o 

co 

TT  oc 

cn 

t-Tli  O0 

C 

Cl  Ot-t 

of 

-jfOfM" 

t—  in  oo 
om 

o; 

CC 

TjfcO 

CO 

ai  c 

en  a 

<-T--Tfl 

tn     •     •' 

•     ■     ' 

C 

o 

13 

e 

c 

a 
t 

p 

P 

2 

C 
cc 

t 

a: 

1 

o 

3 

c 

|_cfc 

^  CO 

P 

C 

P 

i 

■B 
C 

c 
p 

o  o 
rgig 

i   '    ! 

c 

I 

CC 

6 

1 

c 
- 

a 
a 

ft 

•a 

Si 

is 

c 

o 
E 

: 

i 

c 
c 

O 

e 

.3  2  0 
g  o'3 

e 

:--t' 

•  93 

•  O 

1 

03 

ft 
M 

03 

o 

'S 

1? 

03  — 

~ 

oi 

■e 

"5 

oi 

(See  Grain  a 
liquors.     (See 
sprouts.    (Se 
ducts.) 

"5 
p 

"5 

c 
Eh 

^4 
o 

:  a 

7>  o 

CO 
03 

i-> 

..  ft 

?  t-c 

•a 

03 

A'O 

03 

M 

« 

"3 
■*-> 
o 
tH 

c 
C 

«3 

o 

O  +^  a. 

3=-; 

3  CI  c 

c 
E-> 

gppq 

e 

o 
f>i 

z 

4- 

o 
0 

-2  o 

^5 

0 

c 
Eh 

S  « t- 

OhO 

i:ss2 

C 

«PhO 

gooh 

\.S 

cj  OS  cS  P 

a 

s^a 

z 

K 

o 

o 

688 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


n  : :  - 1 


r —  c--  <c 
—  x  r~  l~ 
t-w        ox 


ri  — 
n  ic 

t-^ed 
—  x 

F-  =-. 


i-  3 


t-~  X  — : 

33  5 


MM  O  O 


o<6 


S 
3 


t3 


888 


3> 


-  - 
— "rf 


SG  IC 

—  ~ 

t'  — 

—  a 
x  -. 

rac* 


I 


C=  I— 

re  l~ 


= « —       ■--       x 
■«■  «o X       X       — 

u-  X  l-         *         r* 


us 


G5 


—  .; 


x  — 
x  ~ 


O  S 
—  o 


r-  zz  I 


lrt 


8"» 


—  « 

—  •-: 
c.  x 


£  S3 


5  ■ 


-  ~  ©  S§ 

h   T  -  --  - 
a    u 

-  -  T 


d      o 


-  -:  r 


!*=■§& 


EXPORTS    OF    AGRICULTURAL    PRODUCTS. 


689 


ti- 

w 

00 

_4 

1  f 

CM  lO 

i> 

oo 

CO 

CO 

OSIO 

■fli 

II  ^ 

to 

OS 

8*! 

CM 

o 

OS 

OS  Ct 

t- 

--C 

i-H  tO  OS 

to 

CO  CI 

to 

to       OS 

CM         OS 

t-  ci 

c 

OS 

c 

■V  OS 

r^ 

t-  oc. 

r- 

r-  to 

CO 

CM         O 

OS          T 

c 

•o 

t-co 

CO 

CI  >o 

-X' 

OCJ  CO 

tc 

00  H 

o 

•^ 

to       CO 

OS         TT 

00 

cm 

CO 

O0 

oo 

o 

to  00  *^ 

00 

lOCM 

t- 

to 

i-H         CI 

r-      o 

00 

o 

co 

oo 

t- 

to  C-1 

X.. 

OS— i  c- 

oc 

too 

t£ 

<■-. 

CM         CO 

o 

c-i 

C3 

CO 

00 

DC 

II  — 

CO       to 

lO 

CM 

X)       o 

t-i 

t—      t- 

OS 

to  o 

to 

ION 

CI 

•*CM  to 

CM 

1 

t- 

lO  OS 

~r 

r-  cm 

c 

NOW 

o 

Cl 

»o  CN 

00 

O-* 

C^l 

T(l— H  CO 

OS 

o 

to  os 

lO 

CO  T 

r~ 

r-  lo  o 

(N 

CM 

t-  OS 

t- 

CO  OS 

■o 

OS 

C-l  00 

CO  00 

~i 

vcio 

to 

IN 

cfoT 

oT 

IN 

n 

o 

CO 

CO 

o  os 

OC 

t- 

OS 

1 

t-  os 

to 

c->  00  o 

o 

O0CM 

o 

lis 

S    2 

OS        H 

lO 

t- 

to  CO 

5 

8 

•*  E 

CM  CO  w 

r- 

OS 

CI         00 

c: 

t- 

OS  X! 

- 

>OCM 

00 

OS  OS  CI 

o 

ot- 

c- 

00 

i-l         CI 

CO         OS 

t- 

lO 

to 

to 

■*  to 

c; 

ooso 

oc 

OS 

e 

r-      ^ 

CO         CO 

T 

■n* 

T  lO 

g 

coo  m 

OS 

00  CM 

o 

■  — 

•H           CI 

o      o 

O 

o 

t- 

t- 

^r- 

tOrH 

X 

t—  C)  t- 

to 

Bos 

U3 

i-M         OS 

OS 

CO 

Os" 
CM 

OS* 
CI 

-1" 

*-< 

i  :'~ 

to"     cm" 

to       o 

O 
OS 

to" 

<N 

|| 

to      to 

00 

00 

OS  00 

t- 

OS  CM 

_, 

—I  ooo 

OS 

1 

-«< 

OS  I- 

t- 

O  00 

r. 

CI  T  t- 

OS 

O  OS 

o 

oo 

o 

COO  CI 

t£ 

OS 

»Oc' 

00 

c-fo* 

cf 

o*-^co 

CM  CI 

■<r 

cot- 

a 

CO  CO  to 

o; 

CO 

CO 

C)  o 

s 

nciw 

oc 

oc 

oo  to" 

■^ 

fj 

^J 

§3 

CO 

t-  to 

CO 

T 

c- 

IN  o 

CM 

os-^r  io 

00 

O  to 

to 

1  ■* 

CS|         IM 

T         lO 

CO 

Tf 

5n  S 

o- 

3, 

cooo 

r-  o  co 

op  t- 

3c 

IfC 

t- 

OS         t- 

-tr.       »o 

« 

to 

o 

oc 

r-o 

00 

■fl«    ^H    T^ 

t— 

to 

« 

i-H           C- 

OO       o 

c 

cs 

cooo 

CM 

c 

K 

^r  so 

o 

to  to  to 

00 

OS  UT. 

■-* 

c* 

OS        0C 

i-l       to 

to 

o" 

CI 

« 

t- 

I  P 

o  t- 

■*  — <co 

OS 

•— :  QC 

s 

c 

i—l         CM 

T 

o 

>c 

"3 

c 

to 

"3i-i'<r 

o 

t-  t- 

to 

CJ         i-l 

CM 

C> 

os" 

CM 

CM 

"""■ 

c 

to"     to" 
to      to 

o- 

IN 

a 

o" 
■a 

00 

t-o 

t- 

COCO 

_, 

W5  -^  CM 

rt 

j 

o 

t-  to 

CO 

CMO 

rc 

>o 

OS  lij 

«o 

HN 

00 

oo  r-o 

to 

^J« 

CO  T 

X 

c>toS 

oo**'*  **r 

ci" 

rtO 

oocc 

r- 

tr"r  oc 

c- 

CO 

i-iro 

T 

COU0 

OS 

CM--H-* 

oc 

lO 

>e 

icTto 

p4 

o 

CO 

CO 

1 

lO  t- 

CM 

be 

COO 

CO 

IC*  CO 

CJ 

Osr- 

to 

1 

CM          >C 

CO        OS 

t- 

■*  CO 

X 

rr 

CO  to 

3 

r-  CI  CO 

CO 

»o  a- 

t-          t- 

r-      T 

0C 

U0 

>o>o 

o 

<N 

c 

o  00 

oo 

oo  to  u: 

o 

I-  to 

s 

■* 

O        to 

1<         CO 

to 

lO 

CO  00 

CM 

o- 

CM  00 

o 

o  to  CI 

o 

f-u: 

CO 

CO 

oo      -■* 

CO         CM 

o 

51 

ec 

« 

o- 

35 

CQiHUd 

c 

os-» 

-T 

i—l        c 

to       00 

s 

9 

CO 

CO 

«: 

OS  CM 

CM 

IOH  c- 

CI 

ot- 

>c 

C-       -w 

C- 

CM 

CO 

CO 

CS 

It?       t- 

i-H           IO 

I-       to 

tc 

CO 

o- 

00 

t- 

oo 

-h  m 

to 

Ol  CM 
-^i  ^jS 

-r 

rHCSli; 

w 

^ 

o»o 

'■-. 

X 

TO  1- 

5 

r-lC 

cor- 

o 

oomc 

■* 

os"-< 

c 

to"t-" 

^~ 

cfo  CO 

CO 

^^ 

OS  oo 

X 

CO--J-T 
C)  HOC 

CI 

o 

c 

C 

1 

LO  ^ 

CO 

i 

Os>0 

-r 

« 

1-H   "0 

•c 

IOOC 

-* 

CM-— 

c 

t> 

TP        o 

to      CI 

t- 

CO 

00  -h 

C 

K 

■  Jc 

^r  uo 

S 

VrtiC 

--H  GC 

t- 

X 

uo      e> 

-5    8 

§ 

CO 

or- 

OC 

OC 

»- 

on 

c. 

coo": 

5- 

to  t- 

ec 

,  c 

t-      -» 

SO 

-a«  CM 

to 

DC 

HN 

CO 

tot--* 

r- 

ot- 

to  to 

oc 

5 

OS         OC 

to      ti- 

d 

CO 

Hff 

s 

>> 

cn 

HON 

c 

CO  ~*  to 

d 

cs       OS 

cm 

CO 

fi- 

1 

00  C) 

^ 

tOHlC 

« 

io  to 

c-s 

ir 

CM         CM 

c 

IM 

to 

CM 

I- 

CM 

CS 

lO      o" 
•o      o 

to 

c 

|>T 

"3 

to      to 

o 

00 

oc 

CM 

OiO 

lO 

•-H  -H  T 

to 

»o 

co 

'- 

o  to 

to 

00  CO  oc 

o- 

TO 

■*T 

t-  5 

CO 

■"TIOT 

•«■ 

to 

oTco 

CM 

Os"t-" 

t-' 

•*  CO  OC 

to 

Iff 

HO.— 

r- 

to  CO 

C 

CJHC 

OS 

CO(N 

IC 

CO  to 

o 

COrH  IC 

<? 

* 

t- 

-ics" 

o 

s 

CO 

00 

09 

m    !■ 

K       '. 

■6 

as 

' 

T3 

"2 

C 

V, 

C  c 

o 
Pi 

c 

o  : 

d 

Sec 

V 

d 

c 

"3  T 

boo 

3 

as 

■c 

o 

73 

3 
■O 

— 

•— 

ft 

o 

as 

1 

o  » 

la 

§ 

o 

c 

as 

*H 

g<o 

"o 

s 

M 

<s 

1       3 
to 
C 

3  J 

1 

d 

ta 

«  3 

— 

or. 

5 

0 

i 

to 

a 

o 

03 

as 

1    ft 
•73  T3 
.Si  C 

"O  oo  c 

c 

o 

"a 

"3  Z 

t3 
o 

CO 

as 

U| 

ft 
u 
ox 

T3 
as 

IH 

03 

ft 

as 
u 

f\: 

a 

"3  t 

c 

B 

< 

B 

t 

0 

o 
u 

- 

a 

5- 

3 

vegetable  mat 
forest  products 

vegetable  mat 
forest  products 

agricultural  c 

_,  o 

H        I-l   ft 

3  *s 
>      73  as 

3     *M 

o  o 

'""I'*-. 

0      botuO 

to 

3 

C 

o'» 

d 
3 

h  Cos 

o^ 

"SSa 

+i  a 
o  " 

C 

v 

03 .5 

E- 

EH 

"3 

BO«-cJt 

c 

ft5c 

EH 

f- 

S 

d  bo  "3  bo      c-J  ^ 

cS  3 

©d  6 

o 

-^  c  +j  a     +ss  — 

0.-6.B        o  c 

oo 

03p-5cQ 

E-i 

eg 

*  m 

EH     Eh          tH 

EH 

to 

•£fn 

£ 

bo£-s 

^2 

00 

E- 

o 

as 
> 

> 

?> 

a  1906- 


-44 


690 


YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


LEGAL  WEIGHTS  PER  BUSHEL. 


[From  Bureau  of  Standards,  Department  of  Commerce  and  Labor.] 
Legal  weights  {in  pounds)  per  bushel. 


Apples. 

- 

* 

Beans. 

3 

ft 

-f 

z. 
a 
■ 

X 
X 

= 

— 

- 
- 

ft 

9 

- 
ft 

. 

-r 

B 

c 

X 

£ 

z 
■- 

B 

r 
c 

- 

ft 

- 

■- 

& 

- 
- 

ft 

X 

"5 
- 
— 

_ 

■a 

- 

a 

— 
- 

> 

3 

Com. 

'-- 
B 

a 

— 
a 
_ 

5 

— 

■ 

B 
o 

i 

State  or 
Terr.tory. 

* 

r. 

- 

- 
ft 
< 

00 

- 

ft 
- 
- 

•3 

9 

* 

m 

% 
■~ 
ft 

i . 

E  — 

—    - 
-_  = 

"x   ■ 

T. 
O 

= 
O 

4 

ft 

a 
-_ 

i 

s 

: 

■- 

•:- 

a 

c 
ft 

■- 

I 

50 

—  -i 

-■    £ 

-  — 

-  Z 
ft 

= 

- 

c 

U.S 



650 

24 

« 

i 

4.5    i55 
48    "60 

50 

42 

80 

48 

Ala 

70 

96 

.54 

52 

56 

4fi 

48 

Ariz 

Ark 

14 

20 

.... 
50 

60 



80    ....      70 

'*" 

Cal 

50 

40 

Colo 

60 

14 

20 

Conn ..... 

c60 

80 

i 

' 

-56 

56 

56 

56 

56 

(56 
56 
56 
56 

'56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
50 
56 
' 

56 
56 
56 
56 
' 

56 
56 
" 
5 

.    ..     44 
4^    .... 
4>     .... 

50    .... 

50    .... 
50    .... 
SO    .... 

.50    .... 
.50    .... 
.50    .... 
SO.. 

Del 

Fla 

648 

44 
4S 
18 

650 

45 

24 

24 

2.5 
24 
24 
34 

25 

22 

- 
- 
24 

24 

48    <*60 
47     «60 

48 

20 
/20 

:::::::::: 

70 
70 

Ga 

14 

....    52 

60 

80    .... 

48 

4- 
48 
48 
48 
48 
1 
48 
48 

52 
50 
52 
50 
56 

60 
60 
GO 

60 
60 

Ill 

Ind 

'60 
60 
60 
60 

«60 

46 
46 

*45 

14 
14 
14 

14 

" 

SO    .... 
so   .... 
90     38 
SO   .... 

70 

■ 

70 

70 

;70 

Iowa 

Kans 

Ky 

La 

20 
20 
20 

30 

Me 

60 

60 



48 
48 
48 
50 
48 
52 

a 

50 
50 

45 
50 

Mass 

48    *60 
48       CO 

20 

60 
60 
60 
CO 
60 
60 
60 

SO    ... 
SO    ....      70 
SO    ....      72 
SO    ....      70 
76    ....      70 
SO    ....      70 

Mich 

46 

46 
46 

46 

.50 

i 

14 

14 
14 
14 
14 

Minn 

Miss 

Mo 

Mont 

48 

48 
48 
48 

60 

«60 

n»60 

60 

«60 

62 

60 

60 

20 
20 
20 
20 

57 

N.II 

N.J 

50 

48 

25 

48 
48 
48 
46 
47 
48 

20 

50 

...  .     4- 

•- 

SO" 

'so' 

04 

60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 





80   ....      70 
»S0     4 
SO    ....      70 

i 

80     40       70 

N.  Y 

so 

x.  «■ 

50 
42 
50 

48 



48 

N.  Dak.... 

50 
50 

24 

60 
60 
60 

i 

..... 

- 

30 

Ohio 

Okla 

" 

30 

Oreg 

40 

-■ 

Pa.. 



SO 
48 

R.  I 

48 

25 

60 

B.  C 

S.  Dak.... 

6.50 
45 
46 

21 
28 

28 
28 
25 
25 

48 

- 

60 
P60 
«60 

-: 

.- 

14 

20 
20 
20 

30     42 

- 

- 

"so" 
so' 

"so" 

60 
v60 
60 
60 
60 
CO 
60 
60 

SO    ... 

SO     40       70 

80    ....      70 

80    .... 

SO 

56 
56 
56 

- 

56 

56 

Term 

Tex 

....    50 

48 

Vt 

- 

Ya 

48 

48 

48 

«60 

50 

Wash 

645 

.... 

- 

'- 
50 

W.Ya 

60 

60 



20 

Wis 

.50 

SO    .... 

*  Not  defined. 

a  Small  white  beans,  60  pounds. 

6  Green  apples. 

c  Sugar  beets  and  mangel-wurzel s. 

<*  Shelled  beans,  60  pounds;  velvet  beans,  78  pounds. 

«  White  beans. 

/  Wheat  bran. 

9  Corn  in  ear.  70  pounds  until  Dec.  1  next  after  growth;  68  pounds  thereafter. 

A  English  blue-grass  seed,  22  pounds;  native  blue-grass  seed,  14  pounds. 

'  Rice  corn. 

/Corn  in  ear  from  Nov.  1  to  May  1  following,  70  pounds;  68  pounds  from  Mav  1  to  Nov.  1. 

*  Soy  beans,  58  pounds. 

'  Cracked  corn.  50  pounds. 
"» Green  unshelled  beans,  30  pounds. 
"  Cannel  coal,  70  pounds. 

o  Standard  weight  in  borough  of  Greensburg.  75  pounds. 
p  Dried  beans;  green  unshelled  beans,  30  pounds. 
?  Red  and  white. 


LEGAL    WEIGHTS    PER    BUSHEL. 
Legal  weights  («w  pounds)  per  bushel — Continued. 


691 


seed. 

x 

- 
jj 

= 

- 
- 

J 

— 
- 

X 

= 
- 

x 

- 
- 
— 

i 

- 

X 

: 
: 
- 

1 

i 

— 
_ 

— ' 
- 
1 

Z 

m 

X 

— 
•— 

— 
- 
- 
m 

T. 

- 
M 

I 
J 

z 

32 

32 

- 
- 

32 

- 
- 

36 

2 

32 

;: 
.2 
3-2 

. 

32 
32 

- 

32 

32 

- 

- 

- 

30 

32 

32 

32 

32 

32 

32 

32 

32 

n 

X 

r- 

— 
- 

t 

1 

■_ 
= 

X 

0 

- 

a 

- 
d 

— 

Peaches. 

X 

z 
— 

o 

- 

■d 

- 

o 

•-- 

a 

: 

I 

a 

* 

X 

- 

1 

- 

i 

= 
-= 

I 

r.  s„. 

- 

" 

Ala 

3S         33 



Ark 

33i 

56 

SO 

57 

52 
57 

33         33 

44 

.... 

. 

30 

32 
30 

44 

-:■: 

.... 

ho 

45 

45 

33         33 

Fla 



50 

33    

Go. 

56 

.... 

8 

44 

T<1sthr>    .. 

■:•■ 

:■ 

_• 

Ill 



8 

44 
44 

57 

33 

Ind    

33 

50 

14 

.33 

- 

00 

33 

.V. 

40 

68 
8 
11 

44    ....    50     50 
44    ....    50     50 
44    ....    50     50 
....    43    

57    - 

33 
33 

57 

•- 

Kv 

56 

14 

39 

Ma 

52    

45 



Ml 



'46' 

55 

56 

45    

50      50 

54 

33 

-■ 
28 
33 
33 

44 

14 
14 

36    .... 

....    06 
56 
56 
56 

• 

50    W      -:■ 

.52 

32 
33 

.... 

44 
44 
44 

....    50      50 
....  148     50 

50    

57 
57 

Mo 

d->S 

14 

36     44 
....    50 

a 

57    

57       25 

N 

.... 

> 

44    ....    50      50 

- 

S:3 

X.  H 

X.J 

30 

44 

55 
....    55 

•55 

56 

....56 



33 
33 

X.  Y 

1 

X.  C 

X.  Dak.... 

50 
.50 

52 
55 

\ 

44    50 



48 

33 

Okla 



50 
50 

R.  I 

30 

44 

-A    ....    50      50 

33 

8.C 

S.  Dak 

.56 

- 

- 
32 
32 
30 
32 
32 
32 

52 
56 

Tc.nn 

-- 
32 

56 
56 

8 



....    4S     50 
....    i 

45    

18     50 

«28 

14 

33     50 

;'50 
50 

-- 

Tex 

57 
.52 
•37 

Yt 

Va 

32 

56 

S 

: 

.... 

B 

44 

. 

14 

34 

28 
33 
33 



W.Va 

.... 

Wis 

30 

44 

8 

44 

a 

50 

44 



*  Xot  denned. 

a  Green. 

b  Unwashed  plastering  hair,  S  pounds;  washed  plastering  hair,  4  pounds. 

<•  Bottom  onion  sets. 

<*Top  onion  sets. 

«  Button  onion  sets,  32  pounds. 

;  iiatured. 


692  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Legal  weights  (in  pounds)  per  bushel — Continued. 


3 

a 
ca 

Pn 

# 
w 
n 
o3 
3 
Ph 

Pease. 

o 

03 
O 

Pi 

a> 
o 

03 

O 
ft 

03 

is 

CO 

•6 

ft 
o 

•a 
a 

■s. 

o 

03 

bo 

03 

S3 
3 

"3 

1 
a 

c 

GO 

•6 

5 
a> 

6 
I 

o 

CO 

O 

E 
o 
En 

•6 

Q 

>> 

XI 

o 

e 

Eh 

ft 

B 
s 

Eh 

State  or 
Territory. 

o3 

* 

si 

0 

Pi 

o3 

U.  S. 

GO 

60 

56 

60 

Ala 

60 

60 

55 

56 
56 
56 
54 
56 
56 

55 

60 

60 

Ark 

60 

60 

50 

14 

50 

60 

57 

60 

Cal 



60 

Colo 

60 
60 
60 

45 

50 

60 

60 

54 

45 

60 

50 

20 

60 

D  C 

Del 

60 

Fla. . . 

60 
60 

60 
55 

56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
50 

56 

54 
55 

60 

Ga  .. 

(50 

43 

45 

60 

22 

60 
a  45 

i 

60 

60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 

60 

Ill 

50 
55 
46 
50 
55 

45 
45 
45 
45 
45 

55 

55 

55 

60 

60 

Ind.... 

60 

i>30 
56 

60 

60 

Kv... 

60 

60 

La.;; i  . 



60 

Me 1 

60 

60 
56 

60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 

60 

50 

50 

60 

Md  . 

60 

60 
60 
60 
60 
<-60 
60 
60 
00 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 

54 
56 
55 
60 
56 

14 

14 

45 

50 

56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 
56 

20 

45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 
45 

58 

55 
42 
50 

55 

60 

Mich 

60 

Minn 

52 

57 
42 
42 

45 

60 

60 

Mo 

48 
45 

56 

14 

50 

60 

60 

50 

30 

60 

N.  H . . 

.50 

60 

N.  J... 

i 

54 
54 

60 

N.  Y 

45 
44 

50 

20 

45 

60 

N.  C. 

22 

60 

N.  Dak... 

60 
60 
60 
60 
56 
60 
60 
60 
60 
60 
56 
60 
60 
60 

46 
50 
46 

45 

45 
42 

60 
60 
60 

60 

Ohio 

56 

60 

Okla... 

.. 

60 

45 

60 

Pa... 

60 

R.  I 

i 

c60 
60 
60 

54 
46 
50 
55 

50 

20 

56 

45 
42 
45 
45 
45 
45 

50 
60 
50 
55 
60 
55 

60 

S.  Dak  . 

60 

Tenn 

23     d  56       30 

1 

14 

50 

56 

55 

60 

Tex 

60 

Vt 

i 

60 
60 

«60 

Va. 

22 

56 

12 

60 

Wash 

[a  45 

60 

W.  Va...  . 

45 
45 

42 

60 

Wis 

I ! 

60 

54 

45 

56 

50 

20 

60 

1           1 

*Not  defined. 

a  Green. 

b  Sorghum  saccharatum  seed. 


« Including  split  peas. 
<*  Dried  pears,  26  pounds. 
« India  wheat,  46  pounds. 


LEGAL    WEIGHTS    PER    BUSHEL. 


693 


Commodities  for  which  legal  weights  per  bushel  have  been  fixed  in  but  one  or  two  States. 
[From  Bureau  of  Standards,  Department  of  Commerce  and  Labor.] 


States. 


Apple  seeds 

Beggar-weed  seed 

Blackberries 

Blueberries 

Bromus  inermis 

Cabbage 

Canary  seed 

Cantaloupe  melon 

Cement 

Cherries 

Chestnuts 

Chufa 

Cotton  seed,  staple 

Cucumbers 

Currants 

Feed 

G  rapes 

Goavas 

Hickory  nuts 

Hominy 

Horse-radish 

Italian  rye-grass  seed. . . . 

Johnson  grass 

Kafir  corn 

Kale 

Land  plaster 

Middlings,  fine 

Millet,  Japanese  barnyard 

Mustard 

Plums 

Plums,  dried 

Pop  corn 

Prunes,  dried 

Quinces 

Rape  seed 

Raspberries 

Rhubarb 

Sage 

Salads 

Sand 

Spelt  or  spiltz 

Spinach 

Strawberries 

Sugar-cane  seed 

Velvet-grass  seed 

Walnuts 


Pounds. 
40 
62 
32 
42 
14 
50 
60 
50 
80 
40 

50 
54 
42 
48 
40 
50 
40 

54 
.50 
60 
50 
20 
28 
56 
30 
100 
40 
35 
30 
40 
28 
70 

28 
48 
50 
32 
50 

4 
30 
130 
40 
30 
32 
57 

7 
50 


Rhode  Island  and  Tennessee. 

Florida. 

Iowa.     Tennessee,  48  pounds;  dried,  28  pounds. 

Minnesota. 

North  Dakota. 

Tennessee. 

Do. 

Do. 

Do. 
Iowa.    Tennessee,  with  steins,  56  pounds;  with- 
out stems,  64  pounds. 
Tennessee.    Virginia,  57  pounds. 
Florida. 
South  Carolina. 

Missouri  and  Tennessee.    Wisconsin,  50  pounds. 
Iowa  and  Minnesota. 
Massachusetts. 

Iowa.    Tennessee,  with  stems,  48  pounds;  with- 
out stems,  60  pounds. 
Florida. 
Tennessee. 

Ohio.    Tennessee,  62  pounds. 
Tennessee. 

Do. 
Arkansas. 
Kansas. 
Tennessee. 

Do. 
Indiana;  coarse,  30  pounds. 
Massachusetts. 
Tennessee. 

Florida.    Tennessee,  64  pounds. 
Michigan. 
Indiana  and  Tennessee.    Ohio,  in  the  ear,  42 

pounds. 
Idaho;  -green,  45  pounds. 
Florida,  Iowa,  and  Tennessee. 
Wisconsin. 

Kansas.    Tennessee,  48  pounds. 
Tennessee. 

Do. 

Do. 
Iowa. 

North  Dakota.    South  Dakota,  45  pounds. 
Tennessee. 

Iowa.    Tennessee,  48  pounds. 
New  Jersey. 
Tennessee. 

Do. 


INDEX. 


Page. 

Accounts  Division,  organization  and  work 45i3 

Acorn ,  food  use,  note 306 

Arrr'brfa  caudata,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 191 

Adams  Act,  aid  of  experiment  stations,  remarks 102 

Henry  Cullen.  importance  of  work  for  agriculture 102, 103 

Agricultural  associations,  officers 4t>4_46S,  470-472 

colleges  and  schools,  discussion 104-105 

list  with  presidents,  etc 4.39-460,  464 

education,  consideration  by  Massachusetts  commission 153-154 

experiment  stations,  directors,  work,  etc 461-463,  464 

products,  statistics,  imports  and  exports,  1902-1906... 671 

school-,  organization 160-161 

Agriculture,  Assistant  Secretary,  duties 453 

Department,  appropriations,  1905,  1906,  an< I  1907 43S 

cooperation  with  Post-Office  Department  in  road 

building 117 

expenditures  and  employees US 

grounds,  note 57 

new  building 119-120 

organization 453-4.37 

education,  legislation,  and  formulation  of  courses 155-158 

elementary,  consideration  by  National  Educational  Association.  155 

introduction  into  schools,  article  by  A.  0.  True...  151-164 

production,  review 10-23 

Secretary,  duties 453 

recommendations 34.  93, 

94, 96,  98,  V9, 104, 105, 106, 107,  110, 120 

report 9-120 

State  officials,  list 465 

teaching,  State  conferences 154-155 

.  reseeding  on  range 231 

Alabama,  alfalfa  growing,  note 55 

dairy  industry 4P3 

objeetdesson  road 149 

tobacco  investigations 7-. 

Alaska,  experiment  stations,  remarks 106 

game  protection 94 

Alcohol,  denatured,  investigation,  remarks 69 

Alfalfa,  diseases.  1906 ".._"  506 

growing  in  Alabama  and  Mississippi 55 

use  on  ranges 234 

Alfalfas,  new.  remarks  of  Secretary 39 

Alkali  lands,  drainage,  remarks 112 

reclamation,  discussion 75-78 

resistant  crops 

Alley  pecan,  origin,  description,  etc 366 

Almonds,  green,  use  as  food 

Ampelis  cedrorum,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 197 

Andrews,  Frank,  article  on  ••Freight  costs  and  market  values" 371-386 

Animal  breeding  and  feeding  experiments,  1906 497 

Industry  Bureau,  distribution  of  tuberculin  and  mallein,  article  by 

M.  Dorset 347-354 

organization  and  work 454 

work,  review  bv  Secretary 25-38 

matter,  imports,  1902-1906 ." '. 670-672 

nutrition,  experiments 35 

parasites,  damages,  1906 516 

products,  farm,  statistics,  prices,  etc 637-647,  654-664 

Animal-,  diseases,  spread  by  insects,  etc 87.  496 

domestic,  pedigree  registration 497 

See  also  Farm  animals. 

695 


696  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Page. 

Anthonomus  grand**.     See  Boll  weevil,  cotton 508 

Ants,  use  against  boll  weevil 84,  318-322 

Aphides,  eggs,  destruction  by  lime-sulphur  wash 446 

Apple,  bitter  rot,  Ozark  Mountain  region 41 

diseases,  1906 499 

insect  injuries,  1906 512 

juice,  unfermented,  carbonation  and  sterilization 242-243 

clarification 239-242 

packages  for  keeping 244-246 

preparation,  article  by  H.  C.  Gore 239-246 

new  varieties,  descriptions,  nomenclature,  etc 355-360 

Apples,  statistics,  export*,  1902-1906 685 

Appointment  clerk,  duties 453 

Appropriations,  Agriculture  Department,  1905,  1906,  and  1907 458 

Apricot,  diseases,  1906 500 

scale,  destruction  by  grosbeak 192 

Arid  regions,  cloud-bursts 327 

Arizona,  alkali  lands,  reclamation 77 

Arkansas,  dairy  industry 420 

Arlington  Experimental  Farm,  remarks 58 

Army  worm,  damage,  1906 „ 510 

Asparagus,  diseases.  1906 502 

Asp idiotus  forbesii,  control,  note 446 

pernicioms.    See  San  Jose  scale. 

rapax,  destruction  by  birds 194 

zonatus,  destruction  by  birds 192 

A  sses,  statistics,  numbers 635-637 

Assistant  Secretary  of  Agriculture,  duties 453 

Asterolecaniuiii  Dariolosum,  destruction  by  birds 191 

Atmosphere,  upper,  study 121-123 

Austria-Hungary,  restriction  of  American  meat  imports 251 

Avocado,  diseases,  1906 502 

new  variety,  origin,  description,  etc 363-365 

resistance  of  cold 364 

A  zotobacter,  relation  to  nitrogen  fixation 131 

Bacillus,  spp. ,  relation  to  soil  nitrification 128, 129, 130 

Bacon,  exports,  1 902-1906 682 

prohibitions,  foreign,  against  imports 249-251 

Bacteria,  nitrogen-fixing,  distribution 54 

two  classes 130 

relation  to  nitrogen  supply  for  soil 126 

root-nodule,  nitrogen  fixation 132-135 

varieties  and  efficiency » 133 

soil,  chemical  functions 128 

conditions  for  growth 127 

fixation  of  atmospheric  nitrogen 130-132 

B.rolophus,  spp. ,  u.-efulness  against  scale  insects 194, 197 

Balloon,  rubber,  use  in  atmosphere  study 122 

Bananas,  imports,  1902-1906 " 675 

Banner  grape,  origin,  description,  etc 361-362 

Bark-louse,  oyster-shell,  destruction  by  birds 196 

Barley,  beardless,  forage  use ." 234 

diseases,  1906 505 

exports,  1902-1906 685 

production,  note 12 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  supplies,  etc 56S-575 

winter,  introduction  and  growing 43 

Bean,  diseases,  1906 502 

Beans,  insect  injuries,  1906 510 

statistics,  prices 629 

Bee  culture,  study 88 

Keepers,  National  Association,  officers 470 

Beef,  exports,  1902-1906 682 

growth 248 

prohibitions,  foreign,  against  imports 251 


index.  697 

Page. 

Beet,  harvesting  and  harvesters 277 

insect  injuries,  1906 510, 511, 512 

seed,  single-germ,  production 275 

sugar,  hoeing  and  thinning 266,  275 

improvement 266-268 

transportation 277 

weeding 277 

work,  review  by  Secretary 47—48 

Beet-sugar.     See  Sugar,  beet. 

Beetle,  pine  bark,  study - - 86 

Beetles,  damage  to  forests,  1906 515 

Beets,  growing,  cost 268-278 

siloing 278 

sugar,  labor  in  production 269-274 

rotation  with  other  crops,  notes 269 

topping,  method  of  Belgians 273 

yield  per  acre,  means  of  increase 266 

Belgium,  imports  of  meat  animals,  regulation 252 

Berry  insects,  investigation 88 

James,  review  of  weather  conditions,  crop  season,  1906 473^191 

Big  game  refuges,  remarks 94 

Biological  Survey,  Bureau,  organization  and  work 456 

work,  review  by  Secretary 88-95 

Bird  reservations,  remarks 93 

Birds,  African,  imports  and  prices 178 

Australian,  imports  and  prices 178 

boll- weevil  destruction 91 

cage,  traffic  in  United  States,  article  by  Henry  Oldys 165-180 

captive,  breeding 1 79 

methods  of  procuring  and  shipping 169-171 

domestic,  for  cage  use,  traffic 166-168 

European,  imports  and  prices 176 

foreign,  traffic 168 

importation,  notes , 92 

number  imported 168 

Xorth  American,  destruction  of  scale  insects 192-198 

oriental,  imports  and  prices 176-177 

protection,  1906 533-540 

protection  societies,  officials 472 

raising  for  market,  American  opportunity 180 

retail  trade,  remarks 171 

scale  eating,  summary  of  facts 198 

shore,  distribution  and  migration 89 

song,  breeding 179 

protective  laws,  remarks 167 

South  America,  Mexico,  and  Cuba,  imports  and  prices 179 

species  imported 171-179 

usefulness  against  scale  insects,  article  by  W.  L.  McAfee 189-198 

Biscayne  pineapple,  origin,  description,  etc 345-346 

Bitter  rot,  apple,  Ozark  Mountain  region 41 

Blackberry,  diseases,  1906 501 

Blackleg  vaccine,  distribution,  notes 33,  496 

Blixsus  leucopterus,  damage,  1906 509 

Bluebird,  Western,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Boll  weevil,  climatic  conditions  as  factor  in  control 317-322 

cotton,  control 56-57,  324 

effect  of  late  planting  of  cotton 323 

Entomology  Bureau  work 81-83 

destruction  by  birds 91 

hibernation,  details  of  observations 316 

parasites,  remarks 82 

recent  studies,  article  by  W.  D.  Hunter 313-324 

status  in  1906 313-315 

damage,  1906,  record 508 

Boll  worm,  cotton,  study 83 

Bonsteel,  J.  A.,  article  on  "The  use  of  soil  surveys  " 181-188 

Books,  text,  agricultural,  preparation 158 


693  YEAEBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Page. 

Brazil  nut,  "butter  nut,"  description 298 

Bread,  nutrition  studies 107 

Breeders'  Association,  American,  officials 472 

Breeders,  stock,  associations  and  officers 466-468 

Breeding,  animal,  experiments,  1906 497 

corn,  changes  in  composition  of  kernel 285-288 

work  at  experiment  stations,  article  by  J.  I.  Schulte 279-294 

development  of  new  crops 50-52 

experiments,  necessity 397-399 

horse,  investigations 34 

live  stock,  pedigree  associations,  etc 34 

plat,  development 288-289 

poultry,  remarks — 35 

tobacco,  methods 399-401 

necessity  of  experiments 397-399 

production  of  new  tobacco  varieties 387-404 

remarks 52 

success,  illustration 398 

Brewer  Hybrid  tobacco,  origin,  description,  etc 393-395 

Bright  tobacco,  Virginia,  experiments 80 

Broadleaf  tobacco,  use  in  breeding 388,  393,  400 

Brome  grass,  use  on  western  ranges 232-234 

Brom  us  biennis,  use  on  western  ranges 232-L'34 

Brown-tail  moth.     (See  Moth.) 

Buckeye,  food  use,  note 306 

Buckwheat,  statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  supplies,  etc 582-584 

exports,  1902-1906 685 

Buffaloes,  statistics,  numbers 635-637 

Bulbul,  remarks 177 

Bureau,  Animal  Industry,  etc.     (See  Animal  Industry,  Biological  Survey, 
Chemistry,  Entomology,  Plant  Industry,  Soils,  Statistics,  Weather.) 

Bushel,  legal  weights,  table  by  States  and  commodities 690-693 

Bush-tit,  remarks 195 

Butter,  farm  dairv,  remarks 407 

industry,  North  Central  States 414-416 

investigate  ins,  remarks  of  Secretary 36,  38 

New  England,  industry 410 

nut,  manufacture 305 

preservation  from  mold,  use  of  paraffin 498 

prices,  remarks  and  statistics 416,  654 

production  at  Los  Angeles,  Gal.,  note 427 

statistics,  exports  and  imports  of  world,  etc 646,  654, 670, 681 

Butters,  nut,  discussion 304 

Cabbage,  diseases,  1906 502 

insect  injuries,  1906 511 

Cacao,  production  and  consumption 622-623 

Cactus,  feeding  experiments 56 

California,  agricultural  education,  consideration 154 

investigations 44,  76, 91 

dairying 426-428 

forestry..... 529 

fruit  marketing,  remarks 48 

nutrition  experiments 107, 108 

ranges,  reseeding  in  Sierra  Nevadas 232 

Camels,  statistics,  numbers. 635-637 

Camphor,  growing  of  trees  and  production  of  drug  in  Florida 54 

Canaries,  breeding 166,173 

kinds,  singing,  prices,  historic  notes,  etc 172-174 

shipment 170 

test  of  singing 173 

traffic  in  United  States 165 

Canarium  sp.  nut,  use 297 

Candies,  nut,  discussion 307 

Cantaloupe,  diseases,  1906 503 

Cardinal  birds,  captive,  traffic 166, 167 

redbird,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 192 


INDEX.  699 

Cashew  nut,  remarks 298 

Cattle,  Alaska  experiment 106 

breeders"  associations 466 

diseases,  seientihe  investigation 32 

exports,  growth 248 

feed,  chemical  study 71 

foreign,  contagion,  protective  law 466 

mange,  control 28 

open  market  in  Great  Britain 

prohibitions,  foreign,  against  imports 251 

raising  on  western  plains,  problems 228 

range,  improvement  of  grade  a  necessity 235-237 

ranges.  "Western  United  State*,  overcrowded  condition 225 

statistics,  imports,  exports,  1902-1906 670,  681 

numbers  and  prices 632-635,  651-653 

tick,  eradication 495 

relation  to  dairy  industry,  notes 418 

Texas,  study 87 

trade,  increase  in  prices 492 

tuberculosis  certificates.  State  laws,  note 352 

diagnosis  with  tuberculin 343 

investigation,  1906 496 

Cauliflower,  diseases.  1906 503 

Caustic-soda  wash,  self-boiled 445 

Celery,  diseases,  1906 503 

Cereal  foods,  nutrition  studies 107, 108 

investigations,  chemical 69 

Cereals,  diseases,  1906 505-506 

influences  affecting  quality  and  quantity 

insects  injurious,  19U6 509-510 

production,  note 1 1-13 

Certhia  famHiark  amerioana,  usefulness  against  i-eale  insects 197 

Chamxa  fasciata,  usefulness  against  scale  inseete 194 

Chappelow  avocado,  origin,  description,  etc 363-365 

Cheese,  farm-made,  remarks 407 

industry,  Xorth  Central  States 416-417 

investigations,  remarks  of  Secretary 36 

nutrition  studies 108 

statistics,  exports  and  imports  of  world 647,  670,  681 

prices,  wholesale 655 

Chemistry  Bureau,  organization  and  work 455 

work,  review  by  Secretary _ 69-72 

considerations  in  lime-sulphur  wash 437-438 

Cherry,  diseases,  1906 500 

Che.-ter.  F.  D. ,  soil  bacteria  study,  table 128 

Chestnut,  water,  description 297 

Chestnuts,  cooked,  digestibility 302 

Chickadee,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194, 197 

Chief  clerk.  Agriculture  Department,  duties 453 

Chinch  bug.  damage,  1906 509 

ispin  furfura,  control,  note 446 

Cholera,  hog,  investigation,  1906 496 

Chufa,  nut,  description 297 

Cider,  swee t,  prevention  of  fermentation 239-246 

See  also  Apple  juice. 

Citrange,  new  varieties,  discussion 50,  329-336 

propagation,  suggestions 330 

Citrus  fruit,  experiments 49,  50 

diseases,  1906 

insects  injurious 513 

productions,  new,  Department  of  Agriculture,  article  by  Herbert  J. 

Webber * 329-346 

Civil-service  system,  application  fa i  game-warden  service 219 

Climate,  effect  on  composition  of  durum  wheat,  article  by  J.  A.  Le  Clere. . .  199-212 

Climatic  conditions,  relation  to  cotton  boll  weevil  control 317-322 

Cloud-bursts,  so-called,  article  bv  Edward  L.  Wells 325-328 

Clover,  diseases,  1906 506 


7  yEABBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGEICULTTBE. 

Page. 

Clover,  nitrogen  fixation,  remarks 133 

seed,  statistics,  prices 630-631 

Coal  tar,  use  on  roads 114 

Cockateels.  remarks 17*5 

Cocoa.    "      sti  s,  imports.  1902-1906 

Coffee,  Porto  Rico  experiments,  not«r 

statistics,  exports  and  impor:- 624, 

nse  of  nuts,  note 308 

Cold  waves,  1906,  remarks 

Colleges,  agricultural,  discussion I   4-106 

list,  with  presiden>   el    459-460,  464 

Colman  citrange,  origin,  description,  ns-r.  el   331-333 

Columbia  University,  nutrition  studies 109 

Concrete,  uses,  remarks 116 

Confections,  use  of  nuts 

Congressional  publications,  printing  regulation  changes 

Connecticut,  forestry  and  forest  reservations 529.  530 

nutrition  studies 1 07, 108 

tobacco,  shade  grown,  experiment- 

Valley  tobacco,  use  in  producing  new  tobacco  varieti-r- 287 

wrapper  tobaccos,  improvement 

Contagious  diseases,  control -  -   COS 

Cookery,  use  of  nuts 304 

Cooley  Hybrid  tobacco,  origin,  description,  etc >-     7 

Copper  sulphate,  use  in  water  purification 55 

Coquina  pineapple,  origin,  description,  eta  341-342 

Corn  belt,  drought,  1906 

breeders,  associations,  remarks 293 

breeding  at  experiment  -           -    .rticle  by  J.  I.  Schulte 27     204 

changes  in  composition  of  kernel 285-288 

meal,  exports,  10^1006 686 

mixing,  observations 

new  varieties,  remarks 52 

results  of  crossing,  detail- 21     .-4 

review  of  work 282-288 

selection  as  factor 280-202 

diseases,  1906 505 

forage  usr _  - 

insect  injuries.  1906 r- 

nutrition  studies 107 

production,  note 

seed,  better  grades 47 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  supplies,  etc "42-549 

-    Kansas  Citv  and  Omaha,  to  seaboard 667 

j  orts,  1902-1906 

freight  rates,  Chicago-Xew  York 

ocean 665 

-  igar  content,  study 69 

Cotton  belt,  diversified  farming 

heavy  rains,  1906 479 

boll  weeviL     Set  Boll  weevil,  cotton. 

compressed,  rail  rates,  Cincinnati-New  York 666 

diseases,  1906 506 

exports,  remarks 14 

freight  costs,  relation  to  wheat  freights 71 

rates '. 

insects  injurious,  1906 508—510 

other  than  boll  weevil  and  boll  worm,  remar  -:- 83 

5.,  article  on  "  Range  management  " 225-238 

late  planting,  relation  to  boll-weevil  control 

new  early  variety,  remarks 51 

prices  at  four  parte 374 

action,  note 12 

stalks,  fall  destruction,  importance  in  boll-weevil  control 

"istics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  supplies,  etc 

exports;  1902-1906 

freight  rates,  ocean r»65 


INDEX.  701 

Page. 

Cotton  values  in  England 375 

volunteer  plants,  relation  to  boll-weevil  control 324 

wilt-resistant  varieties 42 

Cotton-seed  products,  feed  for  hogs 35 

Cottonwood  lumber,  prices,  rise,  1894-1906 526,  527 

Cottony  maple  scale,  destruction  by  birds 195 

Cowpea,  diseases,  1906 506 

Cows,  dairv,  North  Central  States 413 

statistics,  numbers,  etc 632-637,  651-653 

Craft,  Qiincy  E.,  review  of  progress  in  forestry,  1906 525-533 

Cranberry,  diseases,  1906 501 

Cream  nut,  South  African,  note , 298 

separator,  use  in  clarification  of  apple  juice 240-242 

Creeper,  tree,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 191, 197 

Crop  reporting,  Statistics  Bureau  work 99 

season,  1906,  weather  conditions,  article  by  James  Berry 473-491 

zones,  study,  remarks 88 

Crops,  adaptation  to  soils 184-185 

alkali  and  drought  resistant 52 

damage  by  scale  insects 189 

principal,  statistics 542-631 

Cross-fertilization,  tobacco,  relation  to  preservation  of  type 403,  404 

Cross-pollination,  use  in  corn  breeding 282-285 

Cuban  tobacco,  Hazlewood,  new  variety,  origin,  description,  etc 392-393 

use  in  producing  new  tobacco  varieties 287 

Cucumbers,  diseases,  1906 503 

Curculio,  plum,  study 86 

Currant,  diseases,  1906 501 

Currants,  statistics,  imports,  1902-1906 675 

Curtis  pecan,  origin,  description,  etc 368 

Cutworm,  damage,  1906 510,511,512 

Cyanic  acid,  flavor  in  nuts 298 

Cyanocitta  cristatu,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 197 

Dade  pineapple,  origin,  description,  etc 340-341 

Dairy  associations,  national,  list 465 

cattle,  improvement 406 

cows,  North  Central  States 413 

industry,  discussion 36-38 

extent  on  Pacific  coast 422-423 

New  England,  importance 410 

review,  1906 498 

southern  conditions 420-422 

products,  chemical  examination 69 

imports  and  exports,  1902-1906 670,  681 

improvement 406-407 

Pacific  coast  movements 423 

statistics,  cows,  products,  etc 632-635,  646-647,  651-652,  654-655,  670,  681 

Dairying,  New  England,  advantages  and  disadvantages 408-409 

opportunities,  articles  by  Win.  Hart  Dexter,  George  M.  Whitaker, 

B.  D.  White,  B.  H.  Rawl,  and  E.  A.  McDonald 405-428 

Pacific  coast 422-428 

profits \ 407 

southern,  difficulties,  etc 417-422 

Dairymen,  New  England,  needs 410-411 

Dakotas,  winter  forage,  note 234 

Date  culture,  California-Arizona 40 

Davis,  William  Morris,  remarks  on  cloud-bursts  in  arid  regions 327 

Deer,  killing,  1906 537 

Delaware,  forestry 529 

Deliciosa  pineapple,  origin,  description,  etc 338-340 

Delmas  pecan,  origin,  description,  etc 369-370 

Dendroir/i  spp. ,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 1 94 

Dendrology,  studies 68 

Department  of  Agriculture.     See  Agriculture,  Department. 

Dexter,  Wji.  Hart,  article  on  "Opportunities  in  dairying — general" 405-408 

Diaspis  pentagona,  control,  note 446 


702  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


Diet,  nuts 303-304 

Dipping,  sheep,  increase  in  value  of  wool 495 

Disbursements.     See  Accounts. 

Disease,  spread  by  insects,  remarks 87 

Division,  Accounts;  Publications.     See  Accounts;  Publications. 

Documents,  Superintendent,  sale  of  Department  publications 97 

Dorset,  M.,  article  on  "Distribution  of  tuberculin  and  mallein  by  the  Bureau 

of  Animal  Industry  " 347-354 

Drainage  investigations,  experiment  station 111-112 

Dressed  meats.     See  Meats. 

Drought,  danger  in  irrigated  sections Ill 

resistant  crops .• 52 

seasons,  1906 481,  482,  483,  484,  485,  487 

Drug  inspection,  1906,  review  by  H.  W.  Wiley - 520-521 

plant  investigations,  remarks 54 

Drugs,  examination,  for  purity,  remarks 70 

Dry-land  farming,  remarks 46 

Dryobaies,  spp.,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Ducks,  distribution  and  migration 89 

wild,  1906 538 

Durum  wheat.     See  Wheat. 

Dust  less  roads,  experiments,  remarks 114 

Early  Wheeler  peach,  origin,  description,  etc 360 

Eden  pineapple,  remarks 337,  338 

Education,  agricultural.     See  Agricultural  and  Agriculture. 

Educational  institutions,  demand  for  Department  publications 98 

Eggplant,  diseases,  1906 503 

Eggs,  statistics,  prices,  imports  and  exports 664,  671,  681 

Eldridge,  M.  O. ,  review  of  road  laws  passed  in  1906 521-523 

Electric  methods,  nitrogen  fixation 136 

ESeocharis  tuberosa,  nut,  use 297 

Elymus  condensaius,  reseeding  on  ranges 231 

Engineers,  road,  demand,  note 115 

England,  wheat  supply,  remote  sources 385 

Entomology  Bureau,  lime-sulphur  wash,  recommendation 437 

organization  and  work 456 

review  of  injurious  insects,  1906 508-517 

work,  review  by  Secretary 81-88 

EriopJu/es  pyri,  control,  use  of  lime-sulphur  wash 446 

Euc  dypts,  planting,  plan 528 

Eulecanium  spp.     See  Scale. 

Exhibitions,  live  stock,  1906 493 

Experiment  stations,  agricultural,  directors,  work,  etc 461-463,  464 

classes  of  work 103 

Federal,  in  Hawaii,  Alaska,  and  Porto  Pico 106-107 

Office,  organization  and  work 457 

work,  review  1  >y  Secretary 102-]  12 

Export  animals,  inspection,  remarks 28 

tobacco,  experiments 80 

Exports,  agricultural,  statistics,  1902-1906 681-689 

American  meat,  growth 247-249 

animal  products 492 

fruit,  shipments 50 

wheat,  relation  to  farm  values 382 

Farm  animal  products,  statistics,  prices,  etc 687-647,  864-684 

animals,  statistics,  numbers,  prices,  etc 632-637,  848-653 

January  1,  1907 492 

hauling  to  market,  cost 371,372,  .".77 

labor,  sugar  beet,  cost  and  sources 269-274 

management  investigations,  remarks 55-56 

progress  in  1906,  review  by  W.  J.  Spillnian 524-525 

production,  future,  discussion 18-21 

products,  exports  and  imports 13-15 

values,  wheat,  relation  to  exports 382-384 

Farmer,  advance  of  welfare 21-23 


INDEX.  7  OS 

Page. 

Farmers'  Bulletins,  distribution. 95 

institute.-,  officiate,  list 464 

statistics 541 

work  of  Department 1 06 

methods  for  aid  to  schools 102-164 

organizations,  interest  in  education 152 

Farming,  advantage  of  new  forest-reserve  management 60 

capital,  increase 15-16 

dry-land,  investigations 46 

manuals  of  instruction 158 

Farms,  experim.  ntal,  use  against  boll  weevil 81 

object-lesson,  remarks 56.  110 

.  0.  L..  Willis  L.  Moore,  and  W.  J.  Humphreys,   article  on   "New 

problems  of  the  weather" 121-124 

Feed,  hogs,  use  of  cotton-seed  products 35 

winter,  supply  for  range  live  stock 2:; 

Feeding,  animal,  experiments,  1906 497 

stuffs,  chemical  investigations.  1906 521 

Hawaiian,  deficiency  of  lime 106 

Fence  posts,  use  of  concrete,  remarks 116 

wire,  deterioration,  study 116 

Fences,  range,  on  western  plains,  remarks 22 

Fermentation,  tobacco,  Ohio  experiments 79 

Fertilizer,  potash,  use  of  ground  rock,  note 116 

Fertilizers,  influence  on  composition  of  wheat 205 

Fescue,  fall,  usefulness  in  reseeding  western  ranges 232 

Fever,  Texas,  study  of  cattle  tick 87,  495 

Fiber  plant,  diseases,  1906 

Field  crop  insects,  study 

crops,  diseases,  1 906 

southern,  insects  injurious.  1906 508-509 

Fires,  forest,  control,  remarks 63,  527 

danger  and  protection 451.  452 

Flax,  diseases,  1906 506 

Flaxseed,  production,  note 13 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  etc 611-61 

Florida,  dairy  industry 418 

object-lesson  roads 148 

Flour,  baking  tests 44 

exports  and  imports 551-552,  576,  686 

freight  rates,  Chicago  to  European  ports 669 

nut 306 

Flower  gardens,  insects  injurious,  1906 S16 

Flowers,  diseases,  1906 507 

Fly,  Hessian.     See  Hessian. 

house,  spread  of  typhoid  fever 

Food,  ash  constituents,  studies 109 

inspection  and  studies,  Chemistry  Bureau,  discussion 71 .  72 

progress  in  1906.  review  by  H.  W.  Wiley 520-521 

use  of  nuts,  article  by  ML  E.  Jaffa 295-312 

Forage  crops,  diseases,  1906 506 

insects  injurious,  1906 1 09-5 1 0 

green,  use  in  New  England  dairying 4ns 

use  of  rye,  wheat,  barley,  spelt,  etc 234 

Forbes.  B.  A.,  adoption  of  lime-sulphur  washes 430 

Forbush.  E.  X..  statement  regarding  nuthatch 197 

Foreign  markets,  compilation  of  information 100 

Forest  extension,  discussion 66-67 

fires.     See  Fires. 

insects,  damages - 85, 515 

management,  timber  cutting  on  reserves 63-65 

planting  on  reserves  and  elsewhere 8 

products,  exports  and  imports,  1902-1906 673-674,  684 

foreign  trade - __  1  * 

insects  injurious,  1906 SIS 


704  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AGRICULTURE. 

Page. 

1    rest  products,  utilization  of  wood t>8-69 

range,  improvement  under  fence 229 

reservations,  State,  table  with  map 530 

- .  National,  discussion 59-63 

Service,  organization  and  work 455 

some  plans 528-529 

work,  review  by  Secretary 59-69 

studies,  cooperative,  note 65 

tree-.      -     -   3,1906 507 

Fore-try,  associations  and  schools 469-470 

progress,  1906,  review  by  Quincy  K.  (  raft 525-533 

State  work,  discussion 529 

sts,  National,  and  the  Lumber  supply,  article  by  Thomas  H.  Sherrard..  447-452 

management .* 451-452.  525-526 

sales  of  timber,  effect  on  prices,  etc 446,  449-451 

Formulas,  lime-sulphur  wash,  variations 434-437 

France,  imports  of  meat  and  meat  animals,  restrictions 252 

-  '      sts  and  market  values,  article  by  Frank  Andrews 371-386 

future  changes 386 

rates,  comparison  of  ships  with  wagons 380 

d 372,  384,  665 

per  ton  per  mile,  1875-1905 

seaport  from  interior 373.  667 

effect  on  boll  weevil 322 

Fr   sts,  spring,  1906 477 

Fruit,  marketing,  transportation  and  storage,  investigations 4  - 

new  subtropical 40 

nutrition  studies,  remarks 107, 108 

orchards,  California,  bird  injuries 91 

s,  insects  injurious 86 

Fruits,  citrus,  new.  development 50 

diseases,  1906 499-502 

imports  and  exports 50.  675,  685 

insect  injuries.  1906 512-513 

new,  promising,  article  by  William  A.  Taylor 355-370 

nomenclature,  with  synonyms,  remarks  .  * 355-357.  35S,  361,  362,  363,  364 

Fungi,  relation  to  nitrogen  supply  for  soil 126 

T  ing  'us  diseases,  plant.  1906,  notes 499-508 

-  -       ach  injuries,  remarks 42 

Gale  pineapple,  remarks 337 

Galveston,  freight  rates  on  cotton 373 

Game,  census,  Illinois 217 

conditions,  19C  G 537-538 

interstate  commerce 93 

laws,  administration  and  enforcement 218, 535-536 

pre-  r   -  -    State  and  private 539-540 

propagation 538 

protection  and  introduction 92-94 

officials,  lists 471-472 

organizations 536 

1906,  review  by  T.  S.  Palmer 53:>-540 

reserves,  parks,  and  refuges,  national 94,  540 

wardens,  associations 220-222 

early  appointments  and  pay 214.  223 

duties,  powers,  and  dangers 21-5-219.  222 

instructions  in  Michigan 218 

of  to-day.  article  by  R.  W.  Williams,  jr 213-224 

requirements  for  fitness 220 

special  equipment  in  several  States 219 

Gardens,  flower,  insects  injurious,  1906 516 

1  field  laboratories,  remarks 58-59 

vegetable,  diseases  of  plants,  1906 502 

insects  injurious,  1906 510 

Geologists,  State,  cooperation  with  Roads  office,  note 115 


INDEX.  705' 

Page. 

Georgia,  agricultural  high  schools 15fr 

dairy  industry 418 

pecan,  origin,  description,  etc 369 

Geoihlypis  t.  artzeia,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194- 

Germany,  imports  of  meat  and  meat  animals,  restrictions 253 

Gingko  nut,  description 297 

Ginseng,  diseases.  1906 503 

Gipsy,  moth.     See  Moth. 

Glanders,  diagnosis  by  use  of  mallein 350- 

Gnatcatcher,  black-tailed,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Goats,  statistics,  numbers 635-637 

Gooseberry,  diseases,  1906 501- 

Goke,  H.  0.,  article  on  "The  preparation  of  unfermented  apple  juice" 239-246 

Grain,  chemical  analyses  for  feeding 44 

grading,  standardization 45 

of  corn.     See  Kernel. 

qualit v,  factors  of  influence 200 

statistics,  exports  and  imports.  1902-1906 676,  6S5 

freight  rates,  Chicago  to  European  ports 669- 

Grains,  overinigated,  illustrations 211 

Grange,  National,  officers 472 

Grape.  Banner,  new  variety,  origin,  description,  etc 361-362 

diseases,  1906 * 501 

insect  injuries,  1906 512,  513 

Grass,  Johnson,  control 56- 

orchard,  usefulness  on  western  ranges 232 

Para,  usefulness,  remarks 39- 

Grasses.  management  for  improvement  of  public  ranges 229-232 

Grazing,  advantages  of  new  forest-reserve  management 60-61 

National  Forest,  remarks 525.  526 

western  plains,  overgrazing 228 

Great  Britain,  imports  of  meat  and  meat  products,  regulation 256 

Greely,  Gen.  A.  YV.,  remarks  on  cloud-bursts 326.  327 

Greenhouses,  insects  injurious,  1906 516- 

Grosbeak,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 192, 194, 195 

Grouse,  condition,  1906 537 

Guava,  diseases,  1906 502: 

Gumming  fungus,  peach 12 

Gums,  imports,  1902-1906 674 

Hsemanch  us  contortus,  study 496 

Hams,  prohibitions,  foreign,  against  imports 249-251 

statistics,  exports,  1902-1906 682 

Harvest,  sugar  beet 276 

time  and  manner,  effect  on  composition  of  grain 208 

Hauling,  farm,  to  market 371,  372,  377,  382 

Hawaii,  experiment  station,  remarks 106- 

forestry  and  forest  reservations 529,  530,  531 

nutrition  experiments 109 

Hawthorne  scale,  destruction  by  sparrow 191 

Hay,  production,  note 12 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  supplies,  etc 591-595 

exports,  1902-1906 

Hazelnuts,  green,  use  as  food 308 

Hazlewood  Cuban  tobacco,  origin,  description,  etc 392-393 

Health  certificates,  live  stock,  presentation 

public,  protection  from  tuberculosis,  note 352 

Heleodytes  bru.nneicapiO.us,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Heliothis  obsaieta,  study 83 

HeJminthophUa  c  hiiescens,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Hessian  flv,  damage,  1906 509 

study 86 

Hickory  scale,  destruction  by  grosbeak _ 192 

Hides,  statistics,  exports  and  imports  of  world 640-645,  671.  681 

Highway  officials,  State,  list „ 471 

3      A1906 15 


706  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Page. 

Hog,  breeding  experiments,  1901 497 

cholera,  investigations 33, 496 

product-,  American,  Swedish  prohibition  of  imports 255 

Hogs,  breeders'  associations 468 

feed,  use  of  cotton-seed  products 35 

prohibitions,  foreign,  against  imports 249-255 

statistics,  numbers,  etc 632-637,  662-663 

tuberculosis 32 

Hops,  production,  note 13 

statistics,  production,  prices,  etc 608-610 

Horse-chestnut,  food  use,  note 307 

Horses,  breeders'  associations - 467 

breeding  investigations 34,  497 

range,  improvement  of  grade  a  necessitv 237 

statistics,  exports.  1902-1906 *. 681 

imports,  1902-1906 670 

numbers,  prices,  etc 632-635,  64S-650 

Horticultural  societies,  national,  officers 470-471 

House  fly,  spread  of  typhoid  fever ^7 

portable,  kind  in  use  in  sugar-beet  work 273 

Human  disease  spread  by  insects 87 

nutrition,  investigation 107-109 

Humphreys,  W.  J.,  Willis  L.  Moore,  and  O.  L.  Fassig,  article  on  "Ifew 

problems  of  the  weather " 121-124 

Hlxter,  W.  P.,  article  on  "Some  recent  studies  of  the  Mexican  cotton  boll 

weevil " 313-324 

Hunting,  accidents 536 

licenses,  notes 216,  217 

origin  of  system,  fees 223 

Hybrid,  pomelo-tangerine,  development  as  Thornton  orange 336-337 

Hybridization,  tobacco 399 

Hybrids,  orange,  trifoliate  with  sweet,  development 329-336 

tobacco,  new  varieties,  origin,  description,  etc 387,  393-397 

Hydrogen,  use  in  atmosphere  study 122 

Ict&'us  spp.,  usefulness  against  scale  insect.- 194.  197 

Illinois,  agriculture  course  in  schools 158 

lime-sulphur  wash,  early  use 430 

nutrition  studies 10S 

station,  corn  breeding 286, 288 

Imported  animals,  inspection  and  quarantine 28 

Imports,  agricultural,  statistics,  1902-1906 670-680 

British,  relation  of  ocean  freight  rates 

India  rubber,  statistics,  exports  and  imports 627 

Indiana,  forestry  and  forest  reservation 530.  531 

Infectious  diseases,  importance  of  early  diagnosis 347 

Inoculation,  soil,  for  introduction  of  nitrogen-fixing  bacteria 134-136 

Insecticides,  scale  insect  work -  7 

study 70 

Insects,  beneficial,  introduction,  etc 

berry,  investigation 88 

cotton,  study. 81-83 

disease-carrying,  remarks 87 

field  crop,  study 86.  515 

forest,  damage x-~-> 

fruit,  tree,  damage 86 

injurious,  iy06,  review  by  Bureau  of  Entomology 608-517 

scale,  destruction  by  birds,  article  by  W.  L.  McAtee 189-196 

insecticide  work 87 

natural  enemies 190-192 

stored  products --7 

usefulness  against  boll  weevil 

vegetable  crop,  remarks s7 

Inspection,  food,  Chemistry  Bureau,  discussion 71 

drug,  etc",  1906,  review  by  11.  \Y.  Wiley 530-521 

foreign,  of  meat  animals,  fees,  etc 259 


INDEX.  707 

Page. 

Inspection,  meat,  1906 493-495 

Texas  fever,  1906,  results 31 

Iowa,  butter  making,  remarks 415 

forestry 529,  532 

road  laws,  1906 521 

station  corn  breeding 283 

Irrigation,  effect  on  durum  wheat 203 

wheat  in  dry  regions 204 

experiments,  effect  on  wheat 211 

investigations,  experiment  station 109-111 

relation  of  precipitation 385-328 

Italy,  imports  of  meat  and  meat  animals,  restrictions 254 

Jaffa.  Iff.  E.,  article  on  "Nuts  and  their  uses  as  food " 295-312 

Jay,  1  ilue,  usefulness,  note 197 

California,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Jensen  pineapple,  origin,  description,  etc 343-344 

J  ohnson  grass,  eradication,  remarks 524 

Joint  worm,  study 86 

wheat,  damage,  1906 509 

Josephine  persimmon,  origin,  description,  etc 362-353 

Juice,  apple.     See  Apple  juice. 

Jupiter  pineapple,  origin,  description,  etc 342-343 

Kansas  City,  wheat  rates  and  prices 378 

forestry 531 

station,  corn  breeding 282 

wheat,  exporting  cost 383 

Kelep,  boll  weevil  enemy,  uselessness  in  Texas 84 

Kentucky,  agricultural  education,  consideration 155 

road  laws,  1906 521 

Kernel,  corn,  changes  in  composition  by  breeding 285-288 

parts " 2sri 

Kinglet,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 197 

Kite,  use  in  atmosphere  study 122 

Labor,  cost,  reduction  in  sugar-beet  growing 274-278 

sources,  etc. ,  in  sugar-beet  production 269-274 

farm,  1906,  remarks 525 

sugar  beet,  sources  of  supply 270-274 

Laboratories,  plant  industry,  and  testing  gardens 58-59 

Laboratory  tests,  tobacco 402 

Ladybirds,  new,  importation  from  Europe s4 

use  in  destruction  of  scale  insects " 191 

Land  laws,  relation  to  lumber  industry 448 

sugar  beet,  values 268 

United  States,  proportion  under  cultivation 181 

Lard,  freight  rates,  ocean 665 

statistics,  exports,  1902-1906 6S2 

growth 248 

Law,  transportation,  for  live  stock,  changes 493 

Laws,  agricultural  education 155-157 

forestry 532-533 

game,  legislation  and  court  decisions,  etc 533-536 

new,  Department  work 9 

road,  1906,  review  by  M.  O.  Eldridge 521-523 

State,  tubercul<  isis  requirements,  note 

Le  Clekc.  J.  A.,  article  on  "  The  effect  of  climatic  conditions  on  the  com- 
position of  durum  wheat" 190-212 

Lecanium  scales,  control,  use  of  lime-sulphur  wash 446 

Legislation,  agricultural  education 155-157 

game  protection,  1906 533 

meat  inspection,  discaesion 27-28 

public  range,  attitude  of  stockmen 227 

Legumes,  nitrogen  fixation,  remarks 133 

use  in  New  England  dairying 411 


708  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Tage. 

Lemons,  statistic?,  imports,  1002-1906 675 

Lepidosaphes  uhn  i,  control,  note 446 

Lettuce,  diseases,  1906 503 

Library,  Department,  work,  review  by  Secretary 101-102 

organization  and  work 457 

Liehi  nut,  description 297 

Licorice  root,  imports,  1902-1906 676 

Life  zones,  study 88 

Lime,  composition,  variations  and  their  relation  to  lime-sulphur  wash 431-432 

Lime-grass,  reseeding  on  ranges 231 

Lime-sulphur  wash,  boiling,  effect  of  different  periods 43S 

chemical  considerations 437-438 

cooking,  and  cooking  outfits 440-443 

formulae,  variations,  and  recommendation? 434-437 

ingredients 431-434 

preparation 438-443 

time  and  outfit,  for  use  on  San  Jose  scale 443-445 

usefulness 446 

washes,  field  experiments  and  conclusions 435-437 

San  Jose  scale,  article  by  A.  L.  Quaintance 429-446 

Liquid  air,  use  in  atmosphere  study 123 

Liquors,  alcoholic,  statistics,  exports  and  imports,  1902-1906 677,  686 

Little  peach,  control 41 

Live  stock  associations,  officers,  etc 466-468 

industry,  1906,  review 492-498 

interests,  sanitary  officers 468-469 

pedigree  associations 34-466 

raising,  area  of  range  land  necessary  for  success 235 

range,  improving  grade,  discussion 235-237 

industry,  future 238 

ranges,  overcrowded  condition „■  225 

restrictions  on  imports  by  various  countries 251-257 

statistics,  imports,  1902-1906 670 

numbers  and  prices 632-637,  648-653 

rail  rates,  Chicago-New  York 665 

transportation  law,  change 493 

See  also  Stock. 

Locust,  Rocky  Mountain,  damage,  1906 517 

Louisiana  crop  pest  commission,  cooperation  of  Department S2 

dairy  industry 419 

Lowe,  V.  H.,  statement  regarding  scale-eating  birds 197 

Lumber  industry,  advantage  of  new  forest-reserve  management 61 

movement  westward  and  southward 447,  526 

relation  of  land  laws 448 

price,  effect  of  government  sales 451 

prices,  rise,  1S94-1906 526,  527 

sales,  government,  extent  and  growth 450—151 

statistics,  imports,  exports,  1902-1906 675,  684 

supply  and  national  forests,  article  by  Thomas  H.  Sherrard 447-452 

private  forest  lauds,  remarks 526-527 

Macaws,  notes 176 

Magnate  apple,  origin,  description,  etc 355-357 

Magnetism,  terrestrial,  relation  of  sun 123 

Mail  routes,  rural,  improvement  149-150 

Maine,  forestry 531 

nutrition  experiments 107, 108 

Maladie  du  coit,  horse  disease,  eradication 29 

Mallein,  distribution  by  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry,  article  by  M.  Dorset ..  347-354 

manner 350-352 

preparation,  use,  etc 349-350 

Mammalogy,  economic,  study S9-92 

Mango,  diseases,  1906 502 

fiberless,  Florida  ripening 40 

Market,  hauling  from  farm,  cost 371,  372,  377 

values,  relation  of  freight  costs,  article  by  Frank  Andrews 371-386 

Marketing,  fruit,  remarks 48-50 

nuts 311-312 


INDEX.  709 

Ta=-e. 

Markets,  dairy,  in  New  England 408-409 

Maryland,  forestry  and  forest  reservations 530,  531.  532 

smoking  tobaccos,  improvement 53 

Massachusetts,  agricultural  education,  commission  study 153 

forestry 531 

Matthams  pineapple,  remarks 337,  338 

Matting  industry,  encouragement 40 

Maye&oUa  destructor.  '  See  Hessian  fly. 

McAtee.  W.  L.,  article  on  "  Birds  that  eat  scale  insects" 189-198 

McDonald,   E.  A.,  article  on   "Opportunities  in  Dairvine.  on  the  Pacific 

coast " 422-428 

Meal,  nut 306 

oil-cake,  remarks 309 

Meat.  American,  foreign  restrictions,  article  by  Frank  R.  Rutter 247-264 

growth  of  exports 247-249 

res trictions  on  imports  by  various  countries 251-257 

trade  growth,  prospects 264 

animals,  immediate  slaughter  requirements 258 

imports,  prohibitions  and  regulations 2^7-261 

open  market  in  Great  Britain 256 

inspection,  1906 493-195 

discussion  of  changes,  etc 25 

increase  of  inspectors 9 

supply,  discussion  by  Secretary 16-18 

Meats,  dressed,  rail  rates.  Chicago-New  York 665 

imports,  regulations 260 

treatv  limitations 261-262 

statistics,  imports  and  exports 637-638,  672,  682 

rail  rates.  Cincinnati-Xew  York 666 

Melanerpes  f.  bairdi,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Melanoplus  spretus,  damage,  1906 517 

Melon  diseases,  1 906 504, 505 

Melons,  wilt-resistant,  study 42 

Melvix.  A.  D.,  review  of  live-stock  industry 492 

Meteorologic  observations,  upper  atmosphere,  recent  developments 121-123 

Mexican  cotton  boll  weevil.     See  Boll  weevil. 

Miami  pineapple,  remarks 337 

Michigan,  agricultural  education,  consideration 154 

forestry  and  forest  reservation 530.  531 

game  warden's  instructions 218 

Microscopic  work,  remarks 72 

Migration,  duck  and  shore  birds,  remarks 89 

Milk,  market,  business  outlook 411 

industry,  Xorth  Central  States 414 

New  England,  industry 410 

production  and  handling,  remarks  of  Secretary 37 

skim,  value  to  farm  in  North  Central  States 414 

Milking  machines,  use 498 

Mill,  Dr.  Hugh  Robert,  remarks  on  cloud-bursts 326 

Miller,  Judge  Samuel,  discovers  of  new  fruits 361,  362 

Millet,  diseases,  1906 ". 505 

Mina.  India,  note 177 

Mining,  advantages  of  new  forest-reserve  management 60.  528 

Minnesota,  agriculture  in  schools 156. 1  -IS 

butter  making,  remarks 415 

forestry  and  forest  reservations 530,  531 

nutrition  experiments 107,  108 

station,  corn  breeding 285,  290 

Mississippi,  alfalfa  growing 55 

dairy  industry 419 

River,  freight  route,  factor  in  prices,  note 379 

Valley  laboratory,  remarks 58 

Missouri,  agricultural  education,  consideration 154 

agriculture  course  in  schools 157 

Mocking  birds,  breeding  in  captivity 167 

Mold,  prevention  in  butter 498 


710  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Page. 

Montana,  alkali  lands,  reclamation 77 

winter  forage,  note 234 

Moore,  "Willis  L.,  W.  J.  Humphreys,  and  O.  L.  Fassig,  article  on  "New 

problems  of  the  weather" 121-124 

Moose,  killing,  1906 537 

Morgan  horse,  preservation  of  breed,  remarks 34 

Morton  citran^e,  remarks , 330 

Mosquito,  yellow  fever,  study 87 

Moth,  brown-tail,  parasites 83-84 

gipsy,  parasites 83-84 

Moths,  gipsy  and  brown-tail,  damage,  1906 514 

Mount  Wt-ather  research  observaO  >ry 121 

Mountain  areas,  ranges,  reseeding 231-232 

Mules,  exports,  1902-1906 681 

statistics,  numbers,  etc 632-635,648-650 

Mytilaspis  jiuinorum,  destruction  by  birds 191, 196, 197 

Nebraska,  forestry 529.  531 

object-lesson  road 149 

Negro,  education,  proposed  agricultural  instruction 105 

Nevada,  springs  as  water  supply 2  13 

New  England,  dairying  opportunities,  article  by  George  M.  Whitaker 408-412 

Hampshire,  forestry 531 

Jersey,  forestry  and  forest  reservations 52m.  530,  532 

road  laws,  1906 521 

Orlean-,  freight  rate-  on  cotton,  remarks 373 

York,  agricultural  education,  consideration 154 

city,  freight  routes  and  rates  for  cotton 373 

forestry  and  forest  reservations 529,  530 

State  reserves  and  legislation 530,  531.  533 

road  laws,  1906 522 

Newstead,  E.,  observations  on  scale  insect  destruction  by  birds 191-192 

Nighthawk,  eating  of  boll  weevil 91 

Nightingale,  notes 176, 177 

Nitrate,  production  by  use  of  electricity 136 

relation  to  soil  fertility,  notes 127 

Nitrogen,  atmospheric,  fixation  by  soil  bacteria 130-132 

content  of  corn  kernels,  changes  by  breeding 285-288 

determination,  durum  wheat,  remarks 200 

fixation,  electrical  methods,  discussion 136 

pn  'blein.  present  status,  article  by  A.  F.  Wt  ods 125-1)36 

See  also  Protein. 

Nitrogen-fixing  bacteria,  distribution 54 

N&romonca  earopse,  note 127 

North  Carolina,  dairy  industry 420 

Dakota,  alfalfa  experiments ..., 235 

Nurseries,  national  forest,  remarks 524s 

Nut  butters,  discussion '. 304-305 

candies,  discussion 307 

coffees,  remarks 308 

flours  and  meals 306-307 

milk,  infant  feeding,  note 297 

oils,  remarks 309 

pastes,  discussion 31 S 

pistache,  investigation,  description 40,  297 

preserves,  discussion 305 

trees,  diseases,  1906 507 

insects  injurious,  1906 513 

Nuthatch,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194.  197 

Nutrition,  animal,  experiments 35 

investigation-,  progress 107-109 

value  of  nuts 298-303 

Nats,  bleaching,  remarks 311 

composition 298-301 

descriptions 296-298 

digestibility 301-303 

economy  of  use 309-311 


I>'DEX.  711 

rase. 

Nuts,  flavor,  remarks _ 298 

food  use.  article  by  M.  E.  Jaffa 295-312 

green,  food  use 30S 

marketing  and  handling 311-312 

mastication,  necessity 302 

methods  of  use  in  diet 303.  304 

nomenclature,  synonyms :  ■ 

nutrition  studies 107.  108 

shelling,  machines 311 

statistics,  imports,  1902-1906 

Oak  scale,  destruction  by  birds 195 

Oat,  Sixty-day,  introduction 44 

Oatmeal,  exports,  1902-1906 686 

Oats,  diseases,  1906 605 

improvement S3 

production,  note 12 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  supplies,  etc 561-5- 

Ocean  freight  rates,  relation  to  British  imports;  statistics 384.  665 

value  of  goods 372 

two  classes 374 

Office,  Experiment  Stations;  Eoads.     See  Experiment  Stations:  Roads. 

Ohio,  forestry 531 ,  533 

road  laws,  1906 

tobacco  fermentation  and  selection 

Oil  cake  and  oil-cake  meal,  statistic*,  exports  and  imports 

cotton  seed,  exports,  1902-1906 

nut,  meals,  remarks 309 

corn,  content  in  kernel,  changes  by  breeding 285-287 

cotton-seed  statistics,  exports  and  imports ' 

use  against  dust  on  roads 114 

Oils,  nut,  remarks 309 

Olpys,  Henry,  article  on  '"Cage-bird  traffic  of  the  United  States'' 165-180 

Olive  nut.  use 29 7 

scale,  destruction  by  birds 193 

list  of  bird  enemies 194 

Oliver  Red  apple,  origin,  description,  etc 357-358 

Orange  hybrids,  trifoliate  with  sweet,  development 329-336 

new  loose-skinned,  Thornton,  production 336-337 

Oranges,  transportation  investigations 49 

Orchard  grass,  usefulness  in  reseeding  western  range* _   _ 

Orchards,  protection  from  rabbits 91 

Oregon,  dairying 425—426 

Oriole,  eating  of  boll  weevil 91 

species,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194.  1 97 

Orlando  pineapple,  origin,  description,  etc 344-345 

Ornamental  plants,  diseases.  I'Kid 507 

trees,  insects  injurious,  1906 514 

Ortox.  W.  A.,  review  of  plant  diseases  in  1908 49! 

Ozark  mountain  region,  apple  bitter  rot 41 

Pacific  coast,  dairying  opportunities,  article  by  E.  A.  McDonald 423-428 

freight  rates  on  wheat 

Packing-house  inspection,  Chicago 

products,  exports,  imports,  etc 14.  67 

Page,  Logan  Waller,  article  on  ''Object-lesson  roads" 137-150 

Palmer.  T.  S. .  review  of  game  protection,  1906 533-540 

Paper,  chemical  study 71 

Para  grass,  usefulness,  remarks 

Paradise  nut.  note 

Paraffin,  use  in  coating  butter  to  prevent  mold 

Parasites,  boll  weevil 

insect,  remarks 

moth,  of  gipsy  and  brown-tail  moths 

sheep,  remarks - 33 

study  of  stomach  worm 498 

usefulness  in  control  of  cotton  boll  weevil 318-322 


712  YEAEBOOK    0*    THE    DEPAETMENI    OF    AGEICULTUEE. 

raze. 

Parrakeets,  kind?,  qualities,  etc ]  74, 175 

Parrot.-,  capture  and  supply 169 

kinds,  pri                                          J  74-1 76 

-    ...  usefulness  again.--  -  - 191.192,194,197 

Passenger  rates,  railway 669 

Pasture.  New  England,  remarks.                   I  Eange 408,  411 

Pathol   _           _                            a   'ions 41 

503 

Tangier.  usefulness,  remarks 39 

Peach,  early  Wheeler,  new  variety,  origin,  etc 360 

enemies,  control,  use  of  lime-sulphur  wash 446 

insect  injurie-            512,513 

curl,  control,  use  of  lime-sulphur  wash 446 

yell      -                           -  - 41 

Peaches,  transportation,  remark- 48 

Pear  blight,  control  metb      - 41 

diseases,  1906 500 

sect  injuries    I       512 

Peaty-      -           127 

Pecans,  new  varieties        -              ription,  etc 365-370 

Pedigree,  K                             iti   ..- 34 

1906 497 

-ylvania.  forestry  and  f<  :  - 529,  530,  531 

ties,  relation  to  nitrogen  supply  in  soil 126 

jmon,  new  variety,  origin,  description,  etc 362-363 

PhyUocopU*                .  control,  use  of  lime-sulphur  wash 446 

Physics,  experimental,  Mount  Weather,  Ya 124 

solar,  problems  for  study 1 23 

Pickles,  nut,          -  r    - 303 

i                             usefulness  against  scale  ine      - 197 

Pine,  prices,  rise.  1894-1906 526,  527 

Pineapple,  diseases,  1900 _  502 

hybrids,  discussion 337-346 

new  varieties,  remarks 51 

productions,  new,  Department  of  Agriculture,  article  by  Herbert 

J.  Webber - - 

Pine-bark  beetle,  study 

Pinenut,  description 296 

I           -            -  .  lines  against  scale  insects - 194 

Pistache  nut,  investigation;  c                   - 

Plant  dises  -  -                               W.  A.  Orion 499-508 

Industry.  Bureau,  organization  and  work 454 

work,  review  by  Secretary 38-59 

introduction  garden,  Chico,  Cal. ,  remarks 59 

Plum  curculio.  stud  v 86 

diseases,  1906". 501 

scale,  damage 1 90 

Plums,  transportation,  remarks 48 

Poisonous  plant  investigations,  remarks 54 

Pole  sweat,  tobacco,  prevention 81 

Polioptila  caKforniea,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Pollination,  cr  i  corn  breeding 281,282—285 

Pomefru:-                  - 499-500 

Poplar  lumber,  prio  -               -  '4-1906 526,527 

Pork,  •            -    growth 248 

imports    Russian  prohibition 255 

prohibit:                  gn,  i  gainst  imports 249-255 

statistics,  expo:  be          2-1906 682 

Porto  Rico,  experiment  station,  remarks 107 

rhVe  Department,  cooperation  in  road  building 

1     -       ads,  improver.                  -rative  work 117 

]        •       lis     ---.  :        504 

Potatoes,  disease-resistant 42 

production,  note _       ^12 

stat!-                 a     production,  prices,  supplies, etc 584-591 

Poultry-breeding  experiments - 497 

remarks - 35 


INDEX.  713 

Page. 

Precipitation,  departures  from  normal,  1906 491 

January,  February,  March,  and  April,  1906 473,  477,  478,  479 

relation  to  cotton  "boll  weevil  damage 317-318 

irrigation 325-326 

<iho  Rainfall  and  Bains. 

Preservative?,  meat,  foreign  restrictions  of  use 260 

Preserves,  nut,  remarks 305 

Printing,  appropriation,  limitation 96 

Proliferation,  relation  to  cotton  boll  weevil  control 318 

Protein,  content  of  corn  kernels,  changes  by  breeding 2S5-288 

high  content  in  wheat,  remarks 212 

nut.  digestibility,  note 302 

wheat,  effect  of  time  and  manner  of  harvest 209 

influence  of  length  of  growing  season 206 

Provisions,  freight  rates,  Chicago  to  European  ports 669 

Psaltriptirus  m >nim us,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Psvlla.  pear  tree,  use  of  lime-sulphur  wash 446 

Public  Roads,  Office,  work  and  organization 112-118,  45 , 

Publications,  advisory  committee 96 

demand,  increase 96 

Department,  educational  demand 98 

Division,  organization  and  work 456 

work,  review  by  Secretary 95-99 

first  editions  and  reprints 97 

Pulvineiria  mnumerabUis,  destruction  by  birds 195 

Pure-culture  inoculation,  soil  improvement 135 

Quail,  care  of  game  wardens 217 

condition  and  propagation,  1906 537, 538 

Quaixtanxe.  A.  L.,  article  on  "Lime-sulphur  washes  for  San  Jose  scale''  ..  429—446 

Quarantine,  imported  animals,  remarks 2S 

restrictions,  foreign  meat  animals.   258 

Texas  fever,  State  laws,  etc 29-30 

Quince,  diseases,  1906 500 

Babbit  pest,  investigations 90 

Rabun  apple,  origin,  description,  etc 359-360 

Railroads,  use  of  forestry 528 

Railway,  freight  rates  on  wheat  to  interior  points 377 

rates,  freight 665-668 

costs,  discussion 371-386 


passenger 


669 


Rainfall,  concentration,  relation  of  topography 327 

western,  relation  to  ranges  for  live  stock 226 

See  also  Precipitation. 

Rains,  heavy,  Atlantic  coast,  1906 4m' 

Gulf  States,  1906 4^4 

in  cotton  belt,  1906 479 

Montana,  Utah,  and  >*e\v  Mexico,  1906 486 

Pacific  coast  and  Florida,  1906 481 

Range  cattle,  improvement  of  grade  a  necessity 235-237 

horses,  improvement  of  grade  a  necessity 237 

improvement,  discussion 227-233 

lands,  cultivation,  new  movement 237-238 

management,  article  by  J.  S.  Cotton 225-238 

stock  industry,  future,  remarks 238 

worn-out,  reseeding 230.  232 

Ranges,  injury  by  premature  grazing 233 

western,  carrying  capacity,  remarks 226 

winter  feed,  necessity  of  raising 233-235 

Raspberrv,  diseases,  1906 - 501 

Bawl,  B.'H.,  article  on  "Opportunities  in  dairvint:— the  South" 417-422 

Recommendations,  Secretary 34.  93.  94.  96,  98,  99, 104.  105, 106,  107, 110. 120 

Redbird,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 192 

Redtop,  usefulness  in  reseeding  western  ranges 232 

Redwood,  planting  plan 528 

Regulus  calendula,  usefulness  against  scale  insects _  197 

Reindeer,  statistics,  numbers - 635-637 


714  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Page. 

Renovated  butter,  inspection 38 

Resin,  statistic!?,  exports  and  imports 625-626 

Rhode  Island,  forestry  and  forest  legislation 533 

road  laws,  1906 522 

station,  corn  breeding 285,  292 

Rick,  A.  G.,  statement  of  soil  areas  surveyed  to  December  31,  1906 517-520 

diseases,  1906 505 

growing  in  Porto  Rico 107 

investigations,  remarks 45 

.     production,  note 13 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  etc 613-616 

Road  construction,  expert  advice,  etc.,  remarks 113-115,117 

laws,  1906,  review  by  M.  O.  Eldridge 521-523 

making  outfit,  articles 141 

materials,  investigation  of  properties 115-118 

kinds  and  cost,  tables 146. 147 

tests 140-141 

work,  object-lesson,  purpose 142 

Roads,  country,  improvement  as  post  routes,  remarks 117 

making,  cost,  remarks 143, 146 

objectdesson.  article  1  >y  Logan  Waller  Page 137-150 

construction,  remarks 114 

extent  of  construction 144-145 

lectures 150 

reports 139-140 

post,  improvement 149-150 

Public,  Office,  organization  and  work 457 

work,  review  by  Secretary 112-118 

Robins,  Japanese,  description  and  prices 177 

Rock,  fertilizer  use,  note 116 

Rocks,  binding  power,  study 116 

Root-nodule  bacteria,  relation  t< i  nitrogen  fixation 132-135 

varieties  and  efficiency 133 

Rot.  bitter,  apple  in  Ozark  mountain  region 41 

plant  disease,  1906,  notes 499-508 

Rotch,  A.  L. ,  study  of  upper  atmosphere 122 

Bobber,  India,  statistics,  exports  and  imports 627 

Rush,  matting,  introduction,  remarks _  40 

Rusk  citrange,  remarks 329 

Russia,  imports  of  hogs  and  hog  products,  restrictions 255 

Rust,  plant  disease,  1906,  notes. 499-508 

Rustic  citrange,  origin,  description,  use,  etc 334-336 

Rutter,  Frank  R. ,  article  on  "Foreign  restrictions  on  American  meat"...  247-2';4 

Rve,  diseases.  1 906 , 505 

exports,  1902-1906 

f. trace  use  on  ranges 284 

production,  note 13 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  supplies,  etc 575-581 

Rye-grass,  reseeding  on  ranges 231 

Salsify,  disease,  1906 504 

Salt,  value  in  lime-sulphur  wash,  discussion 4o4.  4:;s 

San  Jose  scale,  control,  time  of  application  of  wash 443 

lime-sulphur  washes,  article  by  A.  L.  Ouaintance 42'.'-44»i 

Sanitary  dairying,  notes .' 

officers,"  live-stock,  list 40S-469 

Santa  Rita  Forest  Reserve,  range  improvement 229 

Savage  citrange,  origin,  description,  use,  etc 333-834 

Savannah,  freight  rates  on  cotton 373 

Scab,  plant  disease.     See  Plant  diseases. 

sheep,  control  . .' 28 

Scale,  cottony  maple,  destruction  by  birds 195 

greedy,  destruction  by  birds  '. 194 

hawthorn,  destruction  by  sparrow 191 

insects,  control,  birds  beneficial 91 

use  of  lime-sulphur  wash 446 


INDEX.  715 

Page. 

Scale,  insects,  destruction  by  birds,  article  by  W.  L.  McAtee 189-198 

North  American  birds 192 

insecticide  work 87 

natural  enemies 190-192 

plum,  injuries  to  fruits 190 

San  Jose.     See  San  Jose  scale. 

School  officers,  attitude  toward  elementary  agriculture 152-155 

Schools,  agricultural,  discussion 104-105 

organization 160 

agriculture  as  study,  introduction,  article  by  A.  C.  True 151-164 

farmers'  help,  methods 162-164 

forestry 469 

relation  to  labor  supply  for  sugar-beet  growing 271 

Schulte,  J.  I.,  article  on  "  Corn  breeding  at  the  experiment  stations  " 279-294 

Seaboard,  wheat  routes,  rail  and  water 379 

Seaports,  freight  rates  from  interior 373,  667 

Seasoning,  wood,  studies,  note 68 

Secretary  of  Agriculture.     See  Agriculture,  Secretary. 

Seed,  beet,  relation  to  sugar  content  of  beets 208 

single-germ,  production 48,  275 

clover,  statistics,  prices 630-631 

distribution,  Congressional,  remarks 58 

good,  for  farmer,  remarks 47 

influence  on  composition  of  grain 208 

timothy,  statistics,  prices 630-631 

tobacco,  effect  of  changes 400 

relation  to  preservation  of  type 403-404 

Selection,  seed,  use  in  corn  breeding 289-292 

tobacco  breeding 400-401 

Seminole  pineapple,  remarks 337 

Shade  trees,  diseases,  1906 507 

insects  injurious,  1906 514 

Shamel,  A.  D.,  article  on  "New  tobacco  varieties" 3S7-404 

Sheep,  breeders'  associations 467 

dipping,  increase  of  value  of  wool 495 

internal  parasites,  1906 496 

parasites,  remarks 33 

range,  breeding  experiments 497 

scab,  control 28 

statistics,  exports,  1902-1906 681 

numbers,  imports,  etc 632-635,  656-658,  670 

Sherrard,  Thomas  H. ,  article  on  "National  forests  and  the  luml  >er  supply ' ' .  447—452 

Ships,  freight  rates,  comparison  with  wagon  rates 380 

Shot-hole  fungus,  peach ,  42 

Slulia  ni.  oeeidentaHs,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Silage,  storage  methods 55 

Silk  culture,  investigations 88 

statistics,  exports  and  imports 628 

imports,  1902-1906 671 

Silo,  use  with  sugar  beets 278 

Silos,  need  in  dairy  sections  of  the  South 41S,  419 

Silt'i  c.  arvlcatii.  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Skins,  statistics,  exports  and  imports  of  world 640-645,  671,  681 

Smut.     See  Plant  diseases,  1906. 

Simw,  crop  season,  1906 473 

heavy,  Colorado  and  Wyoming,  1906 489 

Soil,  acidity,  relation  to  1  >acteria,  remarks 1 27 

bacteria,  chemical  functions 

fixation  of  atmospheric  nitrogen 130-132 

conditions,  dairy  districts.  North  Central  States,  remarks 413 

fertility,  relation  of  dairy  farming 405 

inoculation,  distribution  of  inoculated  soil 134-135 

use  of  pure  cultures 135-1 36 

reports,  present  uses 186-187 

resources,  United  States,  possibility  of  increase 181-1 82 

remarks 74 


716  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Page. 

Soil,  survey,  areas  surveyed,  1906,  statement  by  A.  G.  Rice 517-520 

surveys,  use,  article  by  J.  A.  Bonsteel . . . . 181-188 

types,  series,  and  province 183-184 

Soils,  adaptation  of  crops 184-185 

Bureau,  organization  and  work 455 

work,  review  1  >y  Secretary 72-81 

influence  on  composition  of  wheat 205 

nitrogen  content,  availability 125 

uses,  reports 185 

Soleno i > ■<!•>  geminata,  usefulness  against  boll  weevil 321 

Solicitor,  Agriculture  Department 453 

South  Carolina,  dairy  industry 417 

dairy  improvement,  remarks  of  Secretary  37 

dairying,  extension,  appropriation 498 

opportunities,  article  by  B.  H.  Bawl '. 417-422 

S<  »W8,  fecundity 34 

Spain,  imports  of  meat  and  meat  animals,  restrictions 255 

Sparrow,  species,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194, 196 

Sparrows,  Java,  description  and  prices 177 

Spelt,  forage  use 234 

Sphyrapicus  varius,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 197 

Spillmax,  W.  J. ,  review  of  farm-management  study,  1906 524—525 

Spizi  Ua  s.  arizome,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 104 

Spraying,  equipment  fur  lime-sulphur  wash 444 

Springs,  use  as  water  supply  on  western  ranges 233 

Squash,  disease,  1906 1 504 

Stars,  meteorological  relations,  note 1 24 

Statistics,  Bureau,  organization  and  work 457 

work,  review  by  Secretary '..  99-101 

crop,  1906 ." 1 542-631 

farmers'  institute 541 

Stayman,  Dr.  J.,  apple  propagation 355-356 

Stock,  live.     See  Live  stock. 

Stockmen,  attitude  on  public-range  legislation 227 

Stomach  worm,  sheep,  study,  1906 496 

Stone  fruits,  diseases,  1906 501 

Storage,  fruit,  studies 48,  50 

insects  injurious  to  agricultural  products 87 

Stored  products,  insects  injurious,  1906 516 

Storm,  damaging,  Gulf  districts,  1906 488 

St.  .rms,  1906,  notes 478 

Strawberry,  diseases,  1 906 502 

insects  injurious,  1906 517 

Streptoihri.c  spp.,  relation  to  soil  nitrification 128, 129, 130 

Students,  Roads  Office,  notes 115, 117 

Subtropical  laboratory,  remarks 59 

Sugar,  beet,  content  in  beet,  relation  of  climate  and  soil 268 

cost  of  production,  methods  of  reducing,  article  bv  C.  O.  Town- 
send i>r,r,-L'7s 

increase  of  content  in  beet 267 

lab<  »r  colonies 272 

production,  historical  notes 265 

note 12 

statistics,  production,  acreage,  prices,  etc 617-622,  679 

Sulphur,  grades,  effect  of  variation  on  lime-sulphur  wash 438 

occurrence,  preparation,  and  use  in  lime-sulphur  wash 433-434 

Sumatra  tobacco,  use  in  producing  new  tobacco  varieties 287 

Sun,  relations  of  weather 123 

Sunflower  seed,  use 298 

Supplies,  Government,  chemical,  examination 70 

Supply  Division,  Chief,  duties 454 

Surveys,  soil ,  extent,  problems,  and  demands  (see  aUo  Soil-) 73-75 

Swamp  lands,  drainage,  remarks 112 

Sweden,  imports  of  American  swine  products,  prohibition 255 

Sweet  potatoes,  diseases,  1906 503 

Swine.     See  Hogs. 

Switzerland,  imports  of  meat  animals,  regulation 255 


INDEX.  717 

rage. 

Tabebuia,  nut,  use 298 

Tangier  pea,  usefulness,  remarks 39 

Tanning  materials,  study 71 

Tar,  use  on  roads *   114. 

Tariffs,  discrimination  against  American  meats  and  meat  animals 262-263 

Taylor,  William  A.,  article  on  "Promising  new  fruits" 355-370 

Tea  growing,  American,  progress 54 

statistics,  exports  and  imports 623,  679 

Teachers,  attitude  toward  elementary  agriculture  in  schools 152-155 

training,  provision 159-160 

Teche  pecan,  origin,  description,  etc 367 

Telfairia  pedata,  nut,  use 298 

Temperature  influence  on  composition  of  plants 206 

Temperatures,  crop  season,  1906 473-491 

departures  from  normal,  1906,  table 489-490 

Tennessee,  dairy  industry 420 

nutrition  experiments 107, 108 

object-lesson  roads 148 

Texas,  dairy  industry 419 

fever,  eradication 29-32, 495 

tick,  damage,  1906 516 

forestry 529 

f reigbt  rates  on  cotton 373 

range  improvement,  alternation  of  pasture 230 

tobacco  experiments 78 

Thielavia  basicola,  tobacco  disease,  note 398 

Thornton  orange,  origin,  description,  use,  etc 336-337 

Thrush,  varied,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 197 

Thryomanes  b.  spilurus,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Tick,  cattle,  eradication 29-32, 495 

relation  to  dairy  industry,  notes 418 

Ticks,  damage,  1906 516 

Timber,  National  Forest,  disposal 525,  526 

purchase 449 

public,  disposal  under  land  laws 448 

purchase,  advantages  in  dealing  with  Government 451 

sales,  forest  reserve,  extent  and  character 64 

supply,  conservation  by  Government  effort 447-452 

forest  reserve,  management 61 

syndicates,  acquisition  of  public  lands 449 

tests,  remarks 529 

Timothy,  insect  injuries,  1906 509 

seed,  statistics,  prices 630-631 

usefulness  in  reseeding  western  ranges 231 

Tit,  species,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 191, 192, 194 

Titmouse,  species,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194,197 

Tobacco  breeding,  necessity  and  methods 399-401 

diseases,  remarks 398,  504 

hybrid  varieties  and  hybridization. 52,  53,  399 

insects  injurious,  1906 509 

investigations,  Soils  Bureau 78-81 

pole-sweat,  prevention 81 

preservation  of  type 403-404 

production,  note 12 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  prices,  supplies,  etc 605-608 

exports  and  imports,  1902-1906 679,689 

study  and  breeding,  progress 52-54 

Sumatra,  Uncle  Sam  variety,  origin,  description,  etc 389-392 

testing  new  varieties 401—103 

varieties,  new,  article  by  A.  D.  Shamel 387-404 

Tomato,  diseases,  1906 505 

Toumeyella,  destruction  by  cardinal „ 192 

Townsend,  C.  O.,  article  on  "Methods  of  reducing  the  cost  of  producing 

beet  sugar" 265-278 

Tramp  steamer,  freight  traffic 375 

Transportation,  citrus  fruit,  experiments 49 


718  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 

Tage. 
Transportation,  freight  cost,   relation  to  market  values,  article-  bv  Frank 

Andrew- '. 371-386 

fruit,  remarks 48 

game 93 

rate.-?,  statistics 665-669 

sugar-beet 277 

Trapn  KsptaMO,  nut,  use 297 

Treaty  limitations,  relation  to  meat  importation 261-262 

Tree  planting,  forest-reserve  and  cooperative 66-67 

damage  by  scale  insects '  189 

Trifoliate  orange,  hybrids  with  sweet,  development 329-336 

Trlti'v.n  spp.     Set  Wheat. 

Tropical  food  products,  studies 509 

fruits,  diseases,  1906 BOB 

insects  injurious,  1906 513 

Tkve,  A.  C,  article  on  '  "Introduction  of  elementary  agriculture  into  schools'" .  151-164 

Tuberculin,  distribution  by  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry,  article  by  ML  Dorset .  347-354 

manner 350,  352 

results 35 2-354 

preparation,  use,  etc 34S-349 

test,  accuracy 348-349 

Tuberculosis,  bovine,  i (anger  to  man.  remarks 362-353 

_  a,  remark- 32 

investigation,  1906 496 

Tulip  scale,  destruction  by  grosbeak 192 

Turnip,  diseases,  1906 505 

Turpentine,  composition,  study 71 

spirits,  statistics,  exports  and  imports 626,684 

Typhoid  fever,  spread  by  house  fly 87 

Uncle  Sam  Sumatra  tobacco,  origin,  description,  etc 389-392 

Utah,  alkali  lands,  experiments 75 

i  ne,  blackleg,  distribution 33, 496 

Vegetable  crops,  damage,  1906 510 

insects 87 

matter,  imports  1902-1906 672-680 

Vegetables,                  1906 502 

Vermont,  forestry 531 

Vireo  species,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194, 195 

Virginia,  agricultural  education,  consideration '      155 

high  school-,  note 157 

road  laws,  190*3 522 

tobacco,  experiments  with  export  and  bright  kinds 79 

University,  rueteorologic  study 124 

"Wagons,  freight  rates,  comparison  with  ship  rates 380 

Wain:-  :       1 308 

"Warbler  s\  -    .ainst  scale  insects 194.195 

"Warden,  game,  of  to-day,  article  by  K.  W.  Williams,  jr 213-224 

Wash,  lime-sulphur,  cooking  and  cooking  outfits 440-443 

formulas,  variations 434-437 

I  lamtion 438-443 

time  and  outfit  for  u-e  on  San  Jose  scale 443—445 

usefulness 446 

Washes,  lime-sulphur,  for  San  Jose  scale,  article  by  A.  L.  Quamtance 42! 

, 445 

Washington,  alkali  lands,  reclamation 76 

dairying 423-425 

forestry 

range-,  improvement  under  fence 229 

seeding 231 

Water,  analysis,  remarks 79 

notion 

--rvation  on  western  ranges 

contamination,  study 55 

Watermelons,  diseases,  1906 505 


INDEX.  719 

Page. 

Wax  wing,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 197 

Weather  Bureau,  organization  and  work 454 

work,  review  by  Secretary 23-25 

crop  seasons,  1906,  conditions 473—491 

new  problems,  article  bv  Willis  L.  Moore,  W.  J.  Humphreys,  and 

O.  L.  Fassig " ". 121-124 

relations  of  sun 123 

service,  increase,  remarks 24 

Weaver  birds,  remarks 178 

WTebb,  George,  originator  of  White  Burley  tobacco 400 

Webber,  Herbert  J.,  article  on  "  New  citrus  and  pineapple  productions  of 

the  Department  of  Agriculture  " 329-346 

Webworms,  damage,  1906 510 

Weeds,  destruction  in  sugar-beet  growing — 277 

Weevil,  boll.    See  Boll  weevil. 

Weights,  legal,  per  bushel,  table  by  States  and  commodities 690-693 

Wells,  Edward  L.,  article  on  '"Cloud-bursts,  so  called" 325-328 

Wheat,  California,  decline  in  yield  in  Sacramento  Valley 428 

composition,  effect  of  time  and  manner  of  harvest 208-210 

influence  of  length  of  growing  season 206 

seed  and  previous  crop 208 

deterioration,  study 45 

diseases,  1906 506 

durum,  chemical  determinations 200 

composition,  effect  of  climate,  article  by  J.  A.  Le  Clerc 199-212 

description  and  importance 199 

effect  of  excessive  moisture - 202 

forage  use 234 

improvement  and  production 43 

quality,  factors 200 

exports,  relation  of  farm  values 382-384 

famine,  prophecy  reiterated 126 

freight  costs,  relation  to  cotton  freights 371 

rates,  direct  shipments 380 

discussion 377-384 

Pacific  coast 381 

grades  and  values,  relation  to  freight  rates 378 

insect  injuries,  1906 509 

irrigation  effect  in  dry  regions 204 

nitrogen  content,  investigation 521 

Oregon,  decline  in  Willamette  Valley 425 

Pacific  coast,  prices  and  freights,  discrepancies  explained 381 

prices  at  Liverpool 380 

production,  note 12 

statistics,  acreage,  production,  supplies,  etc 549-561 

export  rates,  Kansas  Citv  and  Omaha  to  seaboard 665 

exports,  1902-1906 685 

freight  rates,  Chicago- New  York 667 

ocean 665 

supply,  British,  remote  sources 385 

Wheat-grass,  reseeding  on  ranges 231 

Wheats,  comparison  for  arid  and  humid  regions 202 

durum,  Mexico,  comparison 203 

high-protein,  necessity  of  producing 212 

Whisky,  exports,  1902-1906 686 

Whitaker,  George  M.,  article  on  " Opportunities  in  dairying — Newr  Eng- 
land"    408-412 

White,  B.  D.,  article  on  "Opportunities  in  dairying — North  Central  States" .  412^117 

White  Burley  tobacco,  origin 400 

White-eye,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 192 

Wiley,  H.  W.,  review  of  food  and  drug  inspection,  etc.,  1906 520-521 

Willamette  Valley,  dairying  prospects 425 

Williams,  B.  W.,  Jr.,  article  on  "The  game  warden  of  to-day" 213-224 

Willits  citrange,  remarks 329 

Wilson,  James,  report  as  Secretary  of  Agriculture 9-120 

WUaoniap.  pileolata,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 


720  YEARBOOK    OF    THE    DEPARTMENT    OE    AGRICULTURE. 

Page. 

Wilt  diseases,  1906,  notes 506 

Wilt-resistant  cottons  and  melons,  remarks 42 

Winds,  damage,  1906 487 

Wines,  imports,  1902-1906 677 

Wire,  fence,  study 116 

Wisconsin,  agriculture  course  in  schools 158 

butter  making,  remarks 415 

cheese  industry 416-417 

forestry  and  forest  reserves 529, 530,  532 

station,  corn  breeding 285,  291 

Wolves,  depredations,  investigations. « 90 

Wood  pulp,  statistics,  exports  and  imports 627 

utilization,  note „ 68 

Woodcock,  condition,  1907 537 

Woodland,  management  by  private  owners,  assistance  by  Forest  Service...  65 

Woodpeckers,  species,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 193, 194, 197 

Woods,  A.  F.,  article  on  "The  present  status  of  the  nitrogen  problem" 125-136 

Wool  statistics,  exports  and  imports;  production  and  prices 639,658-661 

Wren,  species,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Wren-tit,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 195 

Yellow-fever  mosquito,  study 87 

Yellowthroat,  Pacific,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Za melodea  spp. ,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 194 

Zonotrichia  spp.,  usefulness  against  insects 194 

Zosterops  capensis,  usefulness  against  scale  insects 192 

o