Skip to main content

View Post [edit]

Poster: simulacrum Date: Jun 5, 2009 10:00pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: A BOY AND HIS DOG

Just to give you a heads up. The following:

http://www.archive.org/details/A_Boy_and_His_Dog

may in fact be a violation of copywrite and, worse
Harlan Ellison(who is extremely litigious) has been notified of this movie being here by one of his roving fanboys.
http://harlanellison.com/heboard/unca.htm

I woulsd suggest removing this movie immediately and avoid any potental problems that could arise from it being made available here.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Paidin Date: Jun 6, 2009 5:00am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

This film is available on other public domain sites. I've read that the copyright has lapsed.

Reply [edit]

Poster: FP Date: Jun 6, 2009 10:02am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

The film has been removed from the archive. I guess that means anyone who wants to download it will be inconveniently forced to visit any of the other eight thousand places on the internet that offer the movie for download or streaming.

I think Ellison doesn't get along well with the internet for some reason.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Jungle Jane Date: Jun 7, 2009 5:31pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

I suggest reading the thread pointed to in the first post.
http://harlanellison.com/heboard/unca.htm

Harlan Ellison himself has addressed this issue so if your interested in hearing what he has to say about this check it out.

What i get from it is that he's not putting the IA on his hit list and that he has never made any money of the film and he doesn't expect to.

Reply [edit]

Poster: guyzilla Date: Jun 8, 2009 10:42am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

So does this mean the film could be put back up or should it be left out. I would tend to lean toward caution myself. I think this is a very interesting question concerning copyright/public domain. If an item's status is questioned, should the matter be looked into to see if the claim is valid, or should the item be taken down without question just to play it safe? I don't think that's an easy question.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Ganbachi Date: Jun 9, 2009 3:44am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

I read Ellison's post and think it definitely should go back up. The only reason it was taken down was because someone on another forum told someone it was there and he said 'I don't care'. The evidence is that the film is PD. Put it back up.

I've got a divx copy I can upload if it's necessary.

Reply [edit]

Poster: A/V Geeks Date: Jun 6, 2009 10:32am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

I'm not sure why folks think this film was public domain.

There is a valid copyright registration that can be found at copyright.gov:

Type of Work: Recorded Document
Document Number: V1761P024
Date of Recordation: 1979-11-13
Entire Copyright Document: V1761P024-027
Date of Execution: 9Mar79; cert. date: 8Nov79
Title: A Boy and his dog; motion picture.
Party 1: Harper Paul Williams.
Party 2: Media Home Entertainment, Inc.

Names: Williams, Harper Paul
Media Home Entertainment, Inc.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Video-Cellar Date: Jun 6, 2009 7:00pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

Thats not a valid copyright claim. That is a registration of a video licence. My understanding of this film, and I have never seen it, is that it was released without a valid copyright notice in 1974. And, as such, was released into the public domain. It is not unusual for Public Domain films to be treated as Copyright by their producers. It is also common for producers to not realise (or accept) the public domain status of their films. Films from this period cannot be saved by registration. Also the law at this time defined the copyright in "Motion Pictures" as encapsulating all images, sounds and texts contained in the film. The concept of 'underlying' copyrights in the whole published work is a mythology created by companies who cannot accept the public domain status of their works. This mythology has cost a lot of companies a lot of money when the companies they attempt to intimidate fight them. See: Maljack vs Goodtimes RE: "McLintock!" Hofheinz vs A&E RE: "It Conquered the World" Trailer
This post was modified by Video-Cellar on 2009-06-07 02:00:18

Reply [edit]

Poster: Video-Cellar Date: Jun 7, 2009 6:06pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

Just checked three different copies of the film from three different sources and they all contain the same incomplete/invalid copyright notice. The notice is incomplete and contains an invalid date (more than one year different from actual publication date.) This makes the film public domain under the relevant copyright law. A registration was lodged with the USCO in 1989 giving false publication information.

Reply [edit]

Poster: simulacrum Date: Jun 9, 2009 4:28pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

I did some looking around and came up with these

Type of Work: Motion Picture
Registration Number / Date: PA0000452604 / 1989-12-01
Title: A Boy and his dog / produced by Alvey Moore ; directed by L. Q. Jones.
Description: 2 videocassettes : sd., col. ; 3/4 in.
Copyright Claimant: III LQJ, Inc.
Copyright Notice: notice: Third LQJ, Inc.
Date of Creation: 1975
Date of Publication: 1975-04-01
Date in Notice: notice: 1974
Authorship on Application: III LQJ, Inc., employer for hire.
Copyright Note: C.O. correspondence.


ype of Work: Motion Picture
Registration Number / Date: PA0000452605 / 1990-03-01
Title: A Boy and his dog / produced by Alvey Moore ; directed by L. Q. Jones.
Description: 2 videocassettes : sd., col. ; 3/4 in.
Copyright Claimant: III LQJ, Inc.
Copyright Notice: notice: Third LQJ, Inc.
Date of Creation: 1982
Date of Publication: 1982-06-01
Date in Notice: notice: 1974
Authorship on Application: III LQJ, Inc., employer for hire.
Previous Registration: Motion picture prev. reg. 1Dec89, PA 452-604.
Basis of Claim: New Matter: new footage added to beginning.
Copyright Note: C.O. correspondence.

Looks like it may be copyrighted after all
Let me just say I'm not trying to cause any trouble here
I just want to prevent any possible problems for the archive

Reply [edit]

Poster: Archfilm Date: Jul 27, 2011 4:45am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

The 1982 copyright was for an alternate version of the film, with "new footage added to the beginning." If the revised version had alterations that were creative, then it is able to be granted a new copyright.

The original version is still in the public domain.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Video-Cellar Date: Jun 9, 2009 5:25pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

I personally would keep the film off Archive because it is clear that at least the producer thinks that the film is not public domain and may cause problems for IA. The film original film is clearly in the public domain due to the eroneous copyright notice. There are loads of suspect registrations on file at the USCO. In the post 1989 copyright world USCO dutifully filed these types of registrations. In the pre-1989 world they had a special department that looked for erroneous notices and fanciful publication information on the paperwork. There are famous examples: Night of the living dead / an Image Ten production ; produced by Russell W.... Type of Work: Cancelled Registration Cancelled Registration Number: PA0000046101 PA reg. cancelled. Published pre ’78 without copyright notice. Title: Night of the living dead / an Image Ten production ; produced by Russell W. Streiner, Karl Hardiman ; directed by George A. Romero. Names: Streiner, Russell W. Hardiman, Karl Romero, George A. DOA;a feature photoplay. By Cardinal Pictures, Inc. Type of Work: Cancelled Registration Cancelled Registration Number: RE0000005723 Registration canceled--in notice 1949, too late for renewal registration. Title: DOA;a feature photoplay. By Cardinal Pictures, Inc. Variant title: DOA Names: Cardinal Pictures, Inc. In the post 1989 world it seems anything goes. USCO dutifully gave Bob Hope his renewal certificate for "Road to Bali" even though his renewal was late (even if it did come with the condition that the renewal was legally invalid and that the USCO would not stand by it in court.) Road to Bali. By Bing Crosby Enterprises, Inc. & Hope Enterprises, Inc. Type of Work: Motion Picture Registration Number / Date: RE0000105899 / 1981-09-01 Renewal registration for: LP0000002200 / 1953-01-01 (in notice: 1952) Title: Road to Bali. By Bing Crosby Enterprises, Inc. & Hope Enterprises, Inc. Copyright Claimant: Bob Hope (PWH) Copyright Note: C.O. correspondence. Variant title: Road to Bali. Names: Hope, Bob Bing Crosby Enterprises, Inc. Hope Enterprises, Inc. So its not surprising that two registrations for "A Boy and His Dog" with fudged figures fell through the cracks.
This post was modified by Video-Cellar on 2009-06-10 00:25:37

Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicola Date: Jun 7, 2009 6:18pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: A BOY AND HIS DOG

I'm so glad you're here to clear up a lot of these copyright questions....somebody at IA should pay you for all you do!